20070036 Ver 1_401 Application_20070107

lP ~ I
ogee Use only:
USACE Action ID No.
(If any particular item is not
I. Processing
Form Version March OS
DWQ No.
~ this P%leCt, please enter "Not Applicable" or'TT/A".)
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
[Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Suffer Rules
^ ection 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
[/]~401 Water Quality Certification Ex
^ press 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:~ / ~~h ,,, ; ~~
3
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details(~chec ~f
II. APPlicant Information D t~ ~ ~! "4
D
1. Owner/Applicant Information S A N S ~ q Q l
Name: v!~l ; ~ -
Mailing Address: 3 ~ r ~li_rv~ • 'vNT~n ~ Lily
~ ~ ~ 7 1 _ ..__._.._.
Telephone Number; Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. AgendConsultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be ttached if t}~e Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: ~On rte ~~~n-~,h
Company Affiliation: r~'~ rrtu,n j}~;,-~
Mailing Address: ~~ L' o /55 rl'~C y Yt ~-~ ~
~f L' 'P N~ a~87lL'
Telephone Number: ~~ (~ as- ~~3g-~. F~ N~ber
E-mail Address: /'}~ ~~~ ~ t_ ~ ~`n ~ / C c,...-, `~- ~ ~
Page 5 of 12

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads, Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USAGE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project:~~,,; s ~~ ~~ll ~P~a ;
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIIV): ~~ ~3
4. Location
County:~~,f (, ~,-.~„~,/ Nearest Town: ~
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): 7 ~~
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landm ,etc, :
),
p~~'
~.a.u.a-G~ ~C ~ ~5 4 ~A/~l -f.Y r ! L~ ~. 4a? ~~ l / ~_ n_ lti
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody,)
Decimal Degrees {6 digits minimum): ~
oW
6. Property size (acres):. D y ~~_ ,
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: K ,,~_
8.
River Basin:~ro~ ~/
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins.
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr state nc us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site
at the time of this aDUlication:~-k;~_, _% , ~ ~
The
general land use in the vicinity of the project
~~.~_~,~~,__i. ,_ ~ ~ ~
Page 6 of 12

10. Describe the overall Uroiect in detail inrln~l;.,...ae +.~_ _r
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work p ; ~ ~ P 1
//,
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn, provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules./~
V. Future Project Plans
Are anY future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
Nn
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is tem or
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly Pdentifiablenoncan
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
~~,
Page 7 of 12
1. Provide a written description of the nr~n.,~P.~ ;,,,,..,,,+,..

2.
wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.)
Total Wetland Impact (acres)
limited to
For dams,
"cam wimin Distance to Area of
100-year Nearest ~pa~
Floodplain Stream
~Vec, ~~ ,,. _ (acres)
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property; p
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts Be sure to identify tempo
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, da~in
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities e, cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc (If stream relocation is pro osed
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the onginal and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acres e, multi I len X width, then divide b 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number Stream Name Perennial or Average Impact Area of
ndicate on ma TYPe of Impact Stream Width
Intermittent? Length Impact
Before Imnact !li„p~,. f e.. ,_ _
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage)
5. Individually list all open water impacts (includin lakes
Ocean and any other water of the U.S. , g ~ Ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
fill, excavation ) ~n water impacts include, but are not limited to
' dyed ~ floodin ,drama e, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number Name of Waterbody Type of Waterb
indicate on ma (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Area of
Impact
~ ~~ ~ ~ ~e ~u ~e_ i ~ ocean, etc. acres
~~'~~ -ul,,~
Total Open Water Imps
~li~
Individually list wetland impacts, Types of impacts include, but are not
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc.
separately list impacts due to both structure and floodinu_
Page 8 of 12

6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the i 7_S_ recult;no ~..,, +hP „T..;p~*•
Stream Im act (acres • o
Wetland Im act (acres): d
Water l:m ct acres : . b I a~
Total lm act to Waters of the U.S. (acres) . o ~ a~
Total Stream Im act (lineaz feet): ~
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes Q No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or lineaz feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If constnaction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification {Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.~L~~~~,,,/i (~~ ,~/,,~ .,I, , ;~
~ f ~ ,/ / ,
LLL ~ ~'t~ ~Lf ~ Pr ~. /! /~ C.~,~tY ~i° n ~:..o./ 1. ~n ~ . ~ ~~ _ A c~ n ! _ ~ ! i i /
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 lineaz feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12

USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January l5, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Cazolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc us/ncwetlands/strmgide html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/lineaz feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http:l/h2o.enr.state nc us/wrp/index htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):_ Q
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): ~~
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): G
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): D
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): ~
Page 10 of 12

IX.
X.
Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federaU /local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No [[
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been fmalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Waters)bed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 1 SA NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffe Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No [v~
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multinliers_
Zone* ~ Impact
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendia
additiona120 feet from the edge ofZone 1.
Multiplier
3 (2 for Catawba)
1.5
the top of the near bank of
Required
Zone 2 extends an
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. ~/,, ~~ ~, , ~,%
Page 11 of 12

XI.
~.
Stormwater (required b3' DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.. 0,$~ ~~s ~ ~~~Pry,~ „ s ors ~ . 09 ~1 ~ ~~,~ 1.
C~cAI.S w; 1 ~ fP~Ma) ~ i~ ~/-c!~ lv~'iC ~- Cr~s,s~5 e~~l~ff~°r~ ~ ~~ c~ra; ~ p, /JPS,
Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
P~nndr~
i~ P(A /E'~~R ~
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
/~~
I~IIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DW Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this anafter-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No [~
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additjonal
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No ~'
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
c. ~~xr~;,-e l „mac ~ ~,n , /-I~~ 1~ <<

3107
(J Applicant/Agent's Signature ate
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12

Rutherford Co, NC
Parcels
Tax PIN: 223523
GPIN:0643209089370000
Account No.: 2153750
Owners Name1: DAVIS MELVIN EUGENE
Owners Name2: DAVIS MARY KATHERINE
Addressl: 356 LYNCH COVE RD
Address2:
City: BLACK MOUNTAIN
State: NC
Zip: 28711
Property Address: 176 RIDGE RD
ACAS: 0
AC_DEED:O
CALC_ACRE: 0.09
No. of Bldgs: 4
Deed Bk/Pg: 433/102
Land Value: $150,500
Bldg. Value: $30,200
Defr. Value: $0
Total Value: $180,700
Sale Price: $0
Neighborhood Code: L30B
Neighborhood Desc.: RESIDENTIAL LAKE
Property Desc.: RES LAKE DR
Zoning:
http://arcims.webgis.netlnc/rutherford/printable.asp?process=idl &x2=1049831.325&y2=... 11/22/2006

Map/BIk/Lot: 500 1 55
Nbr Land Seg.: 1
Stamps:
Land Use:
Township Code: 02
Exempt~ro:
Exempt amt: 0
Flood Plain: N
St_nbr: 176
St_dir:
St_name: RIDGE
St_suffix: RD
Apt nbr:
DISCLAIMER: The information contained on this page is NOT to be construed or used as a "legal
description". Map information is believed to be accurate but atxuracy is not guaranteed.
http:/lwww.webgis.net Anderson & Associates, Inc. httpJ/www.andassoc.com
ib~~l 1 X31 ; (~3~~~~3
~~~~ ~ ~~t ~~"
http://arcims.webgis.net/nc/rutherford/printable.asp?process=idl &x2=1049831.325&y2=... 11 /22/2006

~- ~ as ~~6

~ti,,~ ~ ~, Vie- ~- l ~G ~ ~'~
o`~,'cr~e d°.uu NC
~rz~.w~a, U~1d~.~.oi
~,
,~,~- ,
,~~~~~~
'.7p~C,~ 0~/D ~~ ~~ y g3/G D
~,~, ~,~.¢ - ~;~ae~K ~l cam--ti ~~ ~'~ ~ ~ ~
c~2,

J
J
~~~~~~~1~1 III III III ID ID III II!
EXISTING LAKE LEVEL DECK
TO BE REMOVED AND
REPLACED
EXISTING 8' SEAWALL UNDER WOOD DOCK TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED
WITH ENGINEERED SEAWALL. VERIFY LOCATION PRIOR TO REMOVAL FACE
OF NEW WALL TO LINE WITH FACE OF EXISTING WALL. NEW WALL TO
EXTEND TO PROPERTY LINES. APPROXIMATE LENGTH: 7(1 FEET
U
w
H
O
m
0
a
v
g
3
EXISTING 8' MASONRY RETAINING WALL,
SALVAGE IF POSSIBLE. IF STRUCTURAL
INTEGRITY OF WALL IS COMPROMISED
DURING CONSTRUCTION OF LOWER
SEAWALL, CONSULT ENGINEER FOR
DESIGN REMEDIES
WOOD RETAINING WALL
TO BE REPLACED
IDIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIlIII~I[~~
I
I
I
I
i
I BOATHOUSE DECK
t
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
L-----------------------
r*~~r
~y
~~
EXISTING BOAT DOCK
TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED
PLAN VIEW
NO SCALE
DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
TOP COURSE -LINTEL BLOCK W13~4
REBAR CONTINUOUS
COMPACTED FILL
UNDISTURBED SOIL
12" MASONRY UNITS, SOLID FILLED W/35W PSI
CONCRETE, REINFORCED AS SHOWN
#4 REBAR Wl4' BEND, SPACED 16" OC
1.5" PVC PIPE WEEP/DRAIN HOLE INSTALLED
ABOVE LAKE BOTTOM ~ BLOCK JOINT
SPACED 8' O.C. MINIMUM
#4 DOWEL, 4"X30'X4" SPACED 16' O.C.
OFFSET TO SHORE SIDE
GEO•TEXTILE, SOILSEPARATING,
FABRIC FILTER INSTALLED AS SHOWN
#4 REBAR 30" LONG SPACED 18' OC
3 PCS #4 REBAR CONTINUOUS IN FOOTING
3500RCONCRETEFOOTING. ESTABLISH
FOOTING DEPTH SUCH THAT ELEVATION OF
NEW WALL IS APPROXIMATELY EQUAL TO
EXISTING BLOCK HEIGHT
i_I-1 I I III =_
TYPICAL SECTION_ ~II~~
DESIGN INFORMATION
THE DESIGNS PRESENTED ON THIS DRAWING INCORPORATE 1HE FOLLOWING MMN.81M ygLUES.
VERIFICATION THAT THESE VALUES ARE MET OR EXCEEDED IS NOT THE RESPONSIBEITY OF THE DESIGN ENGNIEER
CONCRETE (IF REQUIRED) IMPORTANCE FACTORS (WHEN RELEVANT)
MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSNE STRENGTH WIND 1.0
FOOTINGS & WALLS/SLABS 3500 / 3000 PSF SNOW 1.0
DENSITY 150PCF SEISMIC 1.0
PERFORMING SLUMP 41NCHES DESIGN LOADS (WHEN RELEVANT)
SOIL ROOFDLlSNOW 15/20PSF
MINIMUM SOIL BEARING PRESSURE 2000 PSF FLOOR DL! LL 10l~0 PSF
MINIMUM SOIL INTERNAL FRICTION ANGLE 30 DEG WIND gp MpH
COMPACTED BACKFILL DENSITY EXPOSURE CATEGORY C
SLIDING COEFFICIENT ~` SEISMIC DESIGN (WHEN RELEVANT)
REINFORCING (IF REQUIRED) SEISMIC USE GROUP 1
ALL REINFORCING STEEL IS TO BE ASTM A615 GRADE 60, SITE CLASSIFICATKNI D
FABRICATED AND PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 318. SPECTRAL RESPONSE
ALL LAPS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 36 BAR DIAMETERS. ACCELERATION SDS 39%g, SD121%g
STRUCTURAL SYSTEM MOMENT FRAME
SEISMIC BASE SHEAR Vx=1.1k, Vr1.1k
ANALYSIS PROCEDURE EQVLNi LTRL FRCS
SEAWALL DESIGN SHOWN BY KNA B. WARNER, PE, LLC, BASED ON GENERAL LAYOUT FURNISHED BY JAY FREEMAN
1. RIP RAP DEPTH 24" MINIMUM OR TO TOP OF WALL
2. DEPTH OF FOOTING MAY VARY BASED ON
CONDITIONS. 14"MINIMUM BELOW LAKE BOTTOM
ON LAKE SIDE.
3. TOP OF NEW SEAWALL ELEVATION THE SAME AS EXISTING
I ~ ~~~
II L•_J.
11111=III IIf= - ~~
III III III '~ ~ _
I~.III-_ili I~--L_I---I_-- -._
II III
Illl;il~l~nlll III-III-ill ill-1_
ill L(I III-=III--i==_111__111--
°< .. a --.. ~-171=(11~1~1~f1~
III--
~_o,
-III III =~~ 111.-11~ I _ EL=985FT.
ILL-1 I I III- III - III- 11 =~ _,.
__I ~ === I ~=J LL---i-J-=' ---- -- ---- _ _
THE SEAWALL SHOWN ON THIS DESIGN DOCUMENT 15 TO BE CONSTRUCTED DURING THE
2008.2007 LAKE LEVEL DRAW DOWN PERK)D. CONSTRUCTKNI SWILL NOT BEGIN BEFORE
THE MOISTURE CONTENT OF THE S00. UNDER THE NEW FOOTING HAS DRED
SUFFICIENTLY TO PREVENT LEACHING CONCRETE CONTAMINANTS FROM ENTERNJG THE
LAKE. IN ADDRKNI, ALL CONCRETE PLACED BELOW THE 990 FOOT ELEVAI K)N SHALL
HAVE BEEN PLACED SOON ENOUGH TO ALLOW A 28 DAY CURE BEFORE CONTACTMIG
RISING LAKE WATER AT THE END OF THE DRAW DOWN PERKX).
1

RIP-0AP AS PER LAKE STRUCTURES
REGULATIONS
GEa117CfILE SOIL SEPARATMIG FILTER FABRK:
MISTALIJ_D AS SHOWN
WATER HEIGHT
EL=990 FT.
O ~ _ ~
~ ~
N ''
~ ~ x
w ~
w
~~
~~
Iw
O
III -=-I! I III =1 I I -1 - III -_ ESTM.IATED WATER HEIG~fT
III. III-III III i I =II I ~ ~ i-_ DURING WINTERDRAW-DOWN
III==III III-III ~~~-~~~-~~~
`\\~~~11101A~o~i,/
~~\\O~~~N,1 g S ~ ~i~ti/,y///
2 Dy4~y i
~~ 9 '
IssSS ~~ g
~~/~~j~q nNin~~~~~~`~
SIGNIFK:ANT CARE HAS BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE THAT THESE PLANS ARE CORRECT AND
COMPLETE AND SATISFY THE DESIGN CRffERU. HOWEVER, KIM B. WARNER, PE, LLC, WILL
NOT ASSUME LIABILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES DUE TO UNFORESEEN DESIGN LOADS OR SOIL
CONDRKNIS THAT WILL NOT SUPPORT 2000 PSF LOADS.
ALL FEDERAL. STATE, LOCAL CODES AND ORDMIANCES AND REGULATKNJS SHALL BE
CONSK)ERED AS PART OF THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS RETAOJYJG WALL
AND SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER ANYTHING SHOWN, DESCRIBED, OR IMPL~D WHERE
VARIANCES OCCUR. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CHECKING AND VER~YMIG ALL
DMIENSIONS AND EXISTING CONDRKNJS. VARIATIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE
ATTENTION OF THE DESIGN ENGgJEER FOR RESOLUTION.
DESIGN OF NEW DOCK ANDIOR BOATHOUSE TO BE COVERED UNDER SEPARATE
ENGINEERING DOCUMENT(S), AS REQUIRED.
MASONRY SEAWALL DESIGN FOR PLAN, ELEVATION & KIM B. WARNER, PE, LLC DATE 12-19-06 SHEET
139 COUNTRYWOOD DRIVE, REV
MR. & MRS. M. E. DAVIS PROJECT TYPICAL SECTION FOREST CITY, NC 28043 1
176 RIDGE ROAD, LAKE LURE, NC 28746 SCALE - AS NOTED PE N019856 FREEMAN STONE MASONRY
CONTRACTOR OF1
M