20160233 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Final Report_20190107

ID#* 20160233
Select Reviewer:*
Mac Haupt
Initial Review
Completed Date
01/07/2019
Mitigation Project Submittal -1/7/2019
Version* 1
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream PF Wetlands r Buffer r Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Gerald Pottern [e-mail]
Project Information
Existing 20160233 Existing 1
(DWR) (nunbersonly ...nodash) Version: (nun-bersonly)
I D#: *
Project Name: Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration
Site
County: Person
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: TRH Wetland Restor 2018 MY -2 FinalRept.pdf 6.46MB
Rease upload only one RDF of the conplete file that needs to be subnitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Gerald Pottern
Signature:*

Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site
Person County NC -- Tar -Pamlico River HUC# 03020101-0102
MY -2 (2018) Annual Fall Monitoring Report
NC -DEQ Division of Mitigation Services: DMS Project # 97071
DEQ Contract #6746 DWR # 2016-0233 ACE #SAW -2016-01101
Data Collected: Oct -Nov 2018 Final Report: January 2019
Environmental
Quality
Submitted To:
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality
DEQ Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Ctr, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
DMS Project Manager: Lindsay Crocker
DEQ -DMS Contract # 006746
MOGENSEN MITIGATION, INC.
P.O. Box 690429 Charlotte, NC 28227
[phone] RichCgWogMit.com
[phone] GeraldkMogMltxom
k1VJ I k1VJ I I
MOGENSEN NIFIGATION. INC

Table of Contents
1.0. Project Background Summary....................................................................................................
1.1. Project Location and Setting............................................................................................
1.2. Pre -Restoration Conditions..............................................................................................
1.3. Mitigation Goals and Performance Criteria.....................................................................
1.4. Mitigation Approach........................................................................................................
2.0. Monitoring Methods...................................................................................................................
3.0. Current Conditions Summary.....................................................................................................
4.0. References...................................................................................................................................
APPENDIX A. Project Background Data
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Attributes
APPENDIX B. Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Table 5. Vegetation Conditions Assessment
Figure 3. Vegetation Plot Photos
Figure 4. Photo Point Photos
APPENDIX C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 6. Vegetation Plot Success Summary
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Stem Count Data
APPENDIX D. Hydrologic Data
Figure 5. Monthly Rainfall Plot with Percentiles
Figure 6. Groundwater Gauge and Rainfall Data
Table 8. Hydrologic Success Attainment
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071
Person County — Tar -Pam HUC 03020101
2
3
3
3
3
5
5
6
7
MY -2 (2018) Annual Monitoring Report
Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

1.0. Project Background Summary
1.1. Project Location and Setting
The Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site (TRHWR) is a full -delivery wetland mitigation project
located in eastern Person County, between Roxboro and Oxford, North Carolina, within the Piedmont
Physiographic Province (Figure 1). The easement comprises 9.98 acres, most of which is drained and
degraded wetlands or former wetlands with hydric soil indicators. The remaining areas include non -hydric
soils, drainage ditches, and a 570 -foot long riparian corridor along a ditch and intermittent stream
connecting the TRHWR site to the adjacent Tar River Headwaters Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset
Mitigation Bank project. Both projects are implemented by Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. (MMI), and are
located on a 228 -acre farm owned by Roy and Joyce Huff, in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin 12 -digit HUC #
03020101-0102. The Huff Farm property is located at 333 Bunnie Huff Road, Oxford NC 27565. The
access road into the TRHWR site is at Latitude = 36.3913, Longitude = -78.8171.
1.2. Pre -Restoration Conditions
The TRHWR site was cleared and ditched for pasture use in the 1940s according to the owner, and was
used for grazing cattle until January 2017 when the conservation easement fence was installed. The project
involves plugging drainage ditches to restore wetland hydrology, fencing to exclude livestock, and planting
native trees and shrubs to restore a Headwater Forest wetland ecosystem similar to what occurred prior to
site clearing and drainage. Remnant native trees left for shade, hydrophytic groundcover plants mixed
among the pasture grasses, and plant species recorded in adjacent natural forests (on the same soil mapping
unit) provided data for the planting plan.
The project will restore approximately 7.65 acres of headwater riparian wetland (6.53 acres reestablishment
plus 1.12 acres rehabilitation) and will generate an estimated 7.28 or more riparian wetland mitigation
credits. Approximately 1.27 acres with non -hydric soils in the southeast corner of the mitigation site will
also be reforested, and a 100 -foot wide by 570 -ft long riparian corridor (1.06 acre) extending southeastward
along the ditch will connect the TRHWR site to MMI's adjacent stream restoration and nutrient buffer bank
project to the south. Total acreage of the wetland mitigation site and riparian connector is 9.98 acres.
Restoration activities including tree planting, surface flow dispersal, and cattle exclusion will reduce soil
erosion and nutrient -enriched runoff from adjacent pasture and cropland within its watershed, and help
retain agricultural chemicals used on these lands. It is expected to improve water quality and habitat in the
receiving tributary and reduce fine sediment loading which will enhance the overall watershed particularly
in the adjacent stream and nutrient mitigation bank.
1.3. Mitigation Goals and Performance Criteria
The subject watershed HUC #03020101-0102 is designated by NCDEQ as a Targeted Local Watershed
(TLW) for water quality improvement projects, and the Tar River reach within and downstream of this
local HUC is recognized as a Significant Natural Heritage Area (SNHA) for its high diversity of aquatic
life including protected species of river mussels and fishes. The TRHWR project is intended to support
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -2 (2018) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County — Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

these TLW and SNHA designations by improving water quality and habitat on the property and
downstream. Specific project goals and objectives as identified in the TRHWR Final Mitigation Plan
(December 2016) include:
GOALS:
• Restore the natural jurisdictional wetland hydro -period to five or more acres of forested
wetland within a nine -acre site;
• Restore forested wetland habitat and improve habitat connectivity between Denny Store
Gabbro Forest (NHP Natural Heritage Area) to the north and the Tar River tributaries;
• Buffer storm water runoff from fecal and other cattle -related pollutants and fertilizer.
OBJECTIVES:
• Plug existing ditches and create sheet flows throughout the site. Aerate soils to reduce
compaction, improve infiltration, and create micro -topography to retain surface flows;
• Preserve the remnant mature Swamp White Oaks (a regionally rare species) for seed source.
Plant appropriate native hardwood trees at a sufficient frequency to establish a diverse
bottomland wetland forest. Treat and/or remove invasive species which may cause problems
for site restoration, including Chinese privet and multi -flora rose;
• Install fencing to exclude cattle and establish a conservation easement to provide permanent
protection on the site.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS and MONITORING:
GOAL
OBJECTIVE
PERFORMANCE
MONITORING
STANDARD
APPROACH
Restore natural
Plug existing ditches and
Water must be on or
Use 11 shallow
hydro -period for
create sheet flow throughout
within 12 inches of the
groundwater self -reading
headwater forest
the site. Aerate soils to reduce
surface for 10% of the
gauges throughout the site
wetland.
compaction, improve
growing season.
at a frequency of about one
infiltration, and create micro-
Hydrographs will
per acre. Visual inspection
topography to retain surface
indicate jurisdictional
of ponding duration.
flows.
hydrology.
Restore forested
Preserve mature swamp white
Survival of 320 stems
Monitor vegetation plots
wetland habitat and
oak trees for seed source. Plant
per acre at year 3, 260
annually and calculate
improve habitat
appropriate native hardwood
stems per acre at year 5
densities of surviving
connectivity with
trees at 10 -ft average spacing
and 210 stems per acre
planted & volunteer stems.
existing forests.
(435 stems/ac) Treat invasive
at MY 7.
species.
Buffer storm water
Plant trees, fence perimeter
Insure the integrity of
Visual inspection will note
runoff from fecal and
and establish a permanent
the cattle exclusion
fence condition through site
other cattle -related
conservation easement.
fencing for the life of the
pictures. Observations will
nutrient inputs.
contract.
be included in annual
monitoring re orts.
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071
Person County — Tar -Pam HUC 03020101
4
MY -2 (2018) Annual Monitoring Report
Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

1.4. Mitigation Approach
Prior to restoration, the TRHWR project area contained 6.53 acres of former riparian wetland (ditched and
drained, grazed pasture) with redoximorphic soil characteristics indicating hydric soils, but lacking
adequate wetland hydrology based on groundwater gauge data and field observations during 2015-2016.
Although the drainage ditches are shallow, they have effectively reduced water retention across much of
the site over the past 70 years due to the slow infiltration rate, rapid runoff, and shallow hardpan in these
soils. The project will re-establish jurisdictional wetlands in this area by plugging the drainage ditches to
increase rainfall retention and dispersal, fencing out livestock, controlling invasive species, and planting
suitable native tree species. These 6.53 acres of wetland restoration will generate riparian wetland credits
at 1:1 ratio, yielding 6.53 WMU.
Another 1.12 acres in the TRHWR project area has been less effectively drained by the ditches, and still
has sufficient hydrology to meet jurisdictional wetland criteria, based on groundwater gauge data and field
observations during 2015-2016. The project will rehabilitate these areas of degraded jurisdictional wetland
(grazed pasture with reduced hydrology) by plugging ditches to increase hydrology, fencing out livestock,
and planting suitable native tree species. These 1.12 acres of wetland rehabilitation will generate riparian
wetland credits at 1.5:1 ratio, yielding 0.75 WMU. TRHWR project components and mitigations assets are
summarized in Table 1, matching the proposed assets in the Mitigation Plan.
2.0. Monitoring Methods
Vegetation plots are monitored annually in accordance with current DMS monitoring guidance (June
2017). The nine installed CVS vegetation plots, each 10 x 10 meters, represents 2.8 percent of the planted
mitigation area. Vegetation monitoring will occur between September and early November, prior to the
loss of leaves. The vegetation success criteria are specified in the Performance Standards above. If success
criteria are not met, site maintenance and monitoring will continue until the success criteria are met.
The twelve onsite groundwater monitoring gauges (RDS and Hobo) and one offsite reference wetland
gauge are downloaded and maintained at least quarterly. Gauge data in the mitigation credit areas are
plotted and evaluated for success based on the mitigation plan performance standard of continuous
saturation within 12 inches of the ground surface for 10 percent of the growing season. Growing season
based on air temperature at a weather station east of Roxboro is from March 28 to November 3, which is
221 days (from USDA WETS table). MMI installed a Hobo dual -probe soil temperature logger near the
middle of the TRHWR site (beside GW -H) in late January 2017. Soil temperature on the site remained
above 41 F at both 10 -inch and 20 -inch depths throughout February and March 2017. The lowest
temperatures recorded were 42.7 F at 10 inches and 45.4 F at 20 inches. Based on soil temperatures
remaining above the USDA -designated temperature for plant physiological activity, March 1 is used as the
start of the growing season, based on field discussions with DMS and USACE. The revised growing
season length is thus 248 days, and the groundwater hydrology success criterion is 25 days.
The conservation easement perimeter fence and ditch plug integrity will be monitored visually and
documented with photo points.
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -2 (2018) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County — Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

3.0. Current Conditions Summary
MMI scientists made several visits to the TRHWR site between March and November 2018 to collect
gauge data and evaluate the condition of the ditches, ditch plugs, and planted and volunteer trees. The CVS
vegetation plot data collection was performed in early October. Seven of the nine CVS plots had 8 to 12
surviving stems (planted plus volunteers) and met the 320 stems per acre success criteria (Tables 6 and7).
Outside of the CVS plots, planted stem survival looks generally good throughout the site, with an estimated
10 to 20 percent apparent mortality. Leader die -back is common on many of the taller seedlings, especially
on tulip poplar and river birch, but most of the trees exhibiting leader die -back also had vigorous basal
sprouts. There are scattered small areas with tree densities less than 320 stems per acre, but none
exceeding the "problem area" size threshold, and no "low woody density" areas or "invasive exotic"
problem areas were designated this year. Groundcover vegetation is excellent throughout, with both treated
areas (non -wetland and drained wetland) and non -treated areas (existing wetland) showing dense and
diverse herbaceous cover. Small unflagged trees outside of the CVS plots remain difficult to see due to the
dense groundcover.
All ditch plugs appear to be stable and performing as designed, despite 8 inches of rainfall during
Hurricane Florence in mid-September. Survival of planted trees, live -stakes, and herbaceous cover on the
plug slopes and tops appears to be providing good protection; no significant erosion on the plugs was
observed. Ponding behind all of the ditch plugs was evident during spring and intermittently during
summer and fall.
Twelve groundwater gauges (A through L) on the project site are roughly arranged in four transects
perpendicular to the main ditch, as recommended by mitigation plan reviewers during field meetings
(Figure 2). Three gauges (A, H and J) are within existing wetland rehabilitation areas, seven gauges (D, E,
F, G, I, L, and K) are within the drained wetland reestablishment areas, and two gauges (B and C) are
downslope from ditch plug #4 in areas not expected to generate wetland credits. Wetland hydrology
success for the TRHWR site is based on saturation within 12 inches of the ground surface for 10% of the
248 -day growing season (March 1 to November 3). The gauges measure the free water table depth and do
not account for capillary fringe saturation which can extends well above the free water table in fine -
textured soils(https://vemonjames.ces.ncsu.edu/eleventh-annual-on-site/soil-wetnesso.
Rainfall in 2018, relative to the 30 -year normal values (30th to 70th percentiles), was normal in January, low
in February, normal in March, and above normal from April through June and from August through
November (Figure 5). In 2018 all 13 gauges (ten in the mitigation credit area, two outside the credit area,
and one off-site reference gauge) exceeded the minimum of 25 consecutive days for hydrologic success
during the early part of the growing season, with consecutive day saturation periods ranging from 64 to 101
days (Figure 6).
Soil temperature data for 2018 support the accepted growing season start date of March 1. Soil temperature
remained above 41 F from January 28 onward, and the lowest recorded soil temperature after March 1 was
44.3 F on March 15. The lowest recorded soil temperature in 2018 was 36.2 F during January 9-10 at 10
inches deep.
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -2 (2018) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County — Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

4.0. References
Lee, Michael T., Peet, Robert K., Roberts, Steven D., Wentworth, Thomas R. (2008). CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation version 4.2, October 2008. Retrieved September 2011, from:
://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm
LeGrand, Harry E. Jr. (2007) Natural Areas Inventory of Person County, NC. NC Natural Heritage
Program, Raleigh NC.
NC Division of Mitigation Services. (2017). NC -DMS Annual Monitoring Report Format, Data
Requirements, and Content Guidance, June 2017. http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/eep/dbb-resources
Schafale, M.P., Weakley, A.S. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Third
Approximation. NC Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh, NC.
Sink, Larry T. (1995). Soil Survey of Person County, North Carolina. USDA Soil Conservation Service
(Natural Resources Conservation Service), Raleigh, NC.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2016. Web Soil
Survey. Available: hqp://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/gpp/
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -2 (2018) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County — Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

APPENDIX A. Project Background Data
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Attributes
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -2 (2018) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County — Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

'I �k
GRANVILLE COYNTY F. i y —
�Y PelsnN caLl14rvrr
cr_ I
IT
qu
� 4
1� f
n V { a M1 F0
I � �• 11,
GCf `x Ll;�,
O'f e
\ —ry (U
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071
Person County — Tar -Pam HUC 03020101
9
C
O
°
a O L
L ° -0
Q N
adv
Q= E
L
°
LL
O
O
� on
O v
z C p
O m N
l6 > L
t7A C o
++ S 41
E U' * ->-
.0 4-
v ` o
L
� v �
° ~ v
00
+�
Z7) v on
o E °
o
o +� °;n �
LLL W
o d 7
N N o
m p c +'
o U
co O -a co
Om O
U
41
_ � N
L
it E
C •V 41 +'
N
U E �
> a v T
U i E j
iz
rl � OL 41
�x o
��
MY -2 (2018) Annual Monitoring Report
Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI
4 �
C
M,-
15
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071
Person County — Tar -Pam HUC 03020101
9
C
O
°
a O L
L ° -0
Q N
adv
Q= E
L
°
LL
O
O
� on
O v
z C p
O m N
l6 > L
t7A C o
++ S 41
E U' * ->-
.0 4-
v ` o
L
� v �
° ~ v
00
+�
Z7) v on
o E °
o
o +� °;n �
LLL W
o d 7
N N o
m p c +'
o U
co O -a co
Om O
U
41
_ � N
L
it E
C •V 41 +'
N
U E �
> a v T
U i E j
iz
rl � OL 41
�x o
��
MY -2 (2018) Annual Monitoring Report
Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site, DMS Project # 97071
Mitigation
Credits
Stream
Riparian
Wetland
Non -riparian
Wetland
Buffer
Nitrogen
Nutrient
Offset
Type
R RE
R RE
R RE
Acres
7.650
Credits
7.270
TOTAL CREDITS
7.277
Project Components
Project Component
or Reach ID
Stationing/
Location
Existing
Footage or
Acreage
Approach
(PI, PII etc.)
Restoration or
Restoration
Equivalent
Restoration
Footage or
Acreage
Drained Wetland
-
6.530
Restore Hydrology,
Fence & Plant
R (Reestablish)
6.530 ac
Grazed Wetland
1.120
Fence & Plant
R (Rehabilitate)
1.120 ac
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Stream
(lin. feet)
Riparian Wetland
(acres)
Non -Riparian
Wetland (acres)
Buffer Upland
(sq. feet) (acres)
Riverine Non-Riverine
Re-establishment (1: 1.0)
6.530 ac
Rehabilitation (1: 1.5)
1.120 ac
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
Creation
Preservation
High Quality Preservation
TOTAL feet or acres
-
- 7.650 ac
TOTAL WMU
-
- 7.277

Table 2. Project Activity & Reporting History
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site, DMS Project# 97071
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Actual Completion or
Deliver
Mitigation Plan
Dec l6
Final Construction Plans
Kory Strader & Brett Strader: 336-685-4339
Dec 16
Construction
Survey Contractor
Jan 17
Planting
Strader Fencing, Inc., Julian NC
Feb 17
Baseline Monitoring/Report
Feb 17
Apr 17
Year 1 Monitoring
Nov 17
Dec 17
Year 2 Monitoring
Nov 18
Dec 18
Year 3 Monitoring
Mellowmarsh Farms, Siler City NC
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Year 4 Monitoring
Mogensen Mitigation Inc, Charlotte NC
Year 5 Monitoring
Rich Mogensen: 704-576-1111; Gerald Pottern: 919-556-8845
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site, DMS Project # 97071
Ecological Engineering, Raleigh NC
Designer
Heather Smith: 919-557-0929
KBS Earthworks, Greensboro NC
Construction Contractor
Kory Strader & Brett Strader: 336-685-4339
Michael T. Brandon, PLS, Roxboro NC
Survey Contractor
Michael Brandon: 336-597-8673
Strader Fencing, Inc., Julian NC
Fence Contractor
Kenneth Strader: 336-314-2935
KBS Earthworks, Greensboro NC
Herbicide and Seeding
Kory Strader & Brett Strader: 336-685-4339
Mogensen Mitigation Inc, Charlotte NC
Planting Contractor
Rich Mogensen: 704-576-1111; Gerald Pottern: 919-556-8845
Mellowmarsh Farms, Siler City NC
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Joanie McLean: 919-742-1200
Mogensen Mitigation Inc, Charlotte NC
Monitoring Performers
Rich Mogensen: 704-576-1111; Gerald Pottern: 919-556-8845
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -2 (2018) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

Table 4. Project Attributes
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site, DMS Project # 97071
Project Name
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site
County
Person County
Project Area (acres)
9.9 acres (Wetland + Buffer Easement combined)
Project Coordinates (lat. and long.)
36.3895, -78.8153
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Piedmont, Carolina Slate Belt
River Basin
Tar -Pamlico River -01
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit
DWQ Sub -basin
3020101 USGS Hydrologic Unit 12 -digit -0102
Tar -Pam -01
Project Drainage Area (acres)
60
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious
Area
0%
CGIA Land Use Classification
Pasture, Crop, and Deciduous Forest
Wetland Summary Information (Post -Restoration)
Parameters
Wetland Area
Size of Wetland (acres)
1.12 ac existing + 6.53 ac drained = 7.65 ac
Wetland Type (non -riparian, riparian riverine or
riparian non-riverine)
Riparian non-riverine (Headwater)
Mapped Soil Series
Iredell Loam (IrB)
Drainage class
Iredell = moderately well; Hydric inclusions = poorly
Soil Hydric Status
Drained Hydric
Source of Hydrology
Shallow ponding; perched on shallow aquitard
Hydrologic Impairment
Drainage ditches (1940s)
Native vegetation community
Headwater depression wetland forest (prior to pasture conversion)
Percent composition exotic invasive vegetation
20% Fescue (sprayed)
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting
Documentation
Waters of the United States — Section 404
Yes
Yes
Prelim JD
Waters of the United States — Section 401
Yes
Yes
Prelim JD
Endangered Species Act
No
N/A
US FWS Letter
Historic Preservation Act
No
N/A
NC SHPO Letter
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)
Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA)
No
N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
No
N/A
NC Floodmaps Data
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A
N/A
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -2 (2018) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

APPENDIX B. Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Table 5. Vegetation Conditions Assessment
Figure 3. Vegetation Plot Photos
Figure 4. Photo Point Photos
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -2 (2018) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

K
Lt C-1• = x
Y �
NeJ
1 23
1 Ditch Plug 6 . 25
Ditch Plug 1�
pp -1 Ditcl' Plug 2
PP -2
Ditch Plug 3 • P.P-3:='
22
L Ditch Plug 4 B {OW
• 26
H'
i � N
28
s _
20
27
■G p ' -
- A 1. .
t•
Legend
O PP- Photo Points
Wetland Rehabilitation (1.12 Ac) Vegetation Plats (Criteria Met) Fence is 6"112" OU Me the
Co`setvation
Wetland Reestablishment (6.64 Ac) n
Vegetation Plats (Criteria Not Met) Easement. R Fnv. � ,•nm
• GW Gauges 2018, 25 -day Criteria Met Ditch Plugs
• GW Gauges 2018, 25 -day Criteria Not Met ` _ _� Conservation Easement Feet
IIGI:NL'?
GW Gauges (Criteria NIA) Fence 0 50 100 200 300 400

Table 5: Vegetation Condition Assessment Table -- MY-2 (2018)
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration #97071. Person County HUC #03020101-0102
Planted Acreage = 7.65
Mapping
Vegetation Problem Category
Definitions
Threshold
CCPV
Number of
Combined
% of Planted
(acres)
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material
0.1
N/A
0
0
0%
Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on
0.1
N/A
0
0
0%
MY3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria.
Total
0
0%
Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor *
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously
0.25
N/A
0
0
0%
small given the monitoring year.
Cumulative Total
0
0
0%
Easement Acreage = 9.98
Mapping
% of
Vegetation Problem Category
Definitions
Threshold
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Easement
(SF)
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map
1000
N/A
0
0
0%
scale).
Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map
none
N/A
0
0
0%
scale).

1V

k°
�K '
. . . . . . . . . . .
h
lit, �. ; arty.. - � < �" `:�`.°
xl
AA.
•rYt
•_cif =`��' +"S .� i S �.x .� .,� '�: � -- _� `,..
CVS
Ct�jGlk33 ffiC��3 .:� ' � . • .rt �- _ ti° 'ti � _ _ ' • .
It -22: NIY-0 Spring 2017 CVS VegPlot-22:
Irw
" '� x• VT
, :
rr jy �,5 r iF'f.
_ • 'i'� fit.. �.•�Frt
`fix, �`•�,�}�"'
+�. fid_ x� $+� a. f 7•° '��
of - �� If•#'gs° I V Y-'"' .ji.• } vi

lost
4, 7,�-
'lit'. RM
... . . . . . . .

e'f
.. _
' "fit �'t ;,. '�k^ '' T�`�, +` r tµ i� . •'..b xSr .�'' ', . *ti • "
"iV^ L'R.TMr: !" :. S•'• Y � yti,• � � � L 4 ,�
t -,., ar }�� ,.�s. 4 aC r`L �. r � � - 7• . � N � � ..a ?i. .. � _ �„ •'�yi ',`iF
m• ; f'`T Yyr. Fti - /=..: -Jc Et. {•.l` L'r 'ye }''. ,^•.y E.' •1
k 3 r y' ., r � :F97� ! 33�; °= „� � � •l `�?i ��r��r � t�. t+:Y! y�'',"5�f, _ • Y � ' '4 '�,. •i'
iF7 'Wir rr.1`F�i'' .• �Ly`'ti�
♦--�";... �,Y.c``�, '�J�iE. .lt, ."S ... .�.,�c�-,�c��~�� �' .r �yit �r�•'i. 5: •�M1�`� - .:i ,
is-- �1+1ic'�'P��''-e -� •'r..��C.. �r .r .i!'_.
'h 1i+.
-G " � �. ���' •"�.'rf � :-�S "� 4 `k� �''�r-.-� ��� � 'f'}• +•s F F 'r ■ , ���74f'-� .1t `J !STT .�•k:, ff,.F ...}
�� ` �' , }- ,` • _ -4'�
y �.-�� "w.'`�,.r 1` fir. ■ _ S fs •r , �'i' 34� s i4 �1'1T'' _ .}, •.
r- •,. aY a �; srJ Zr-- r.: r +.� _ r,' :,i.—�•'-_ h. v '1 'u' .,
O� f'K, 2X '.r rx �,. •�� r �, \� w _ �1a i -. . 1 ,}y'.y { •'i'�' �+. � , ' r. •r _ *, �.�al: .. �' ; a : ' _`
�•.>s k f"'�.�� '�r..3 �@ �- � �` _." „' : i �i ^ r� ■ L- f lJ ��1"'}y '•�Y �.y = i 1� �.
.. ! - =� m � x-. �'��� t � - � ,ti `� '_*�• '�. � `F' y. .'� � _ i x1�er.. � '�, yy� �,Fr
- c >t x '�'� Jf �,. 'o 'stF ,'F � -t ti .. J ��1j �, ;?. f •�. l � f..
ti�'c'.�t ��i�.�'�M w� l+f .at � �' . =rh.�:.: Y�� 4 ' r•1� y it _ :_ .; rr�'' . L.- !'•A. ,.'#`+F.,, °-.r*f _
t c� �&_ !�'z ��. l:•- {' - �. ter, 'r drrfr- r i' � ''.'F. +� T•• r, -rte"' f.�Y�1r� h "ter' T��� 3 t
.r�4-' s. ;%F-. r � 4 f ♦. t } JS � a'�r.
1
. � .,r���-��� i_g .. •-L-_ . 4 'fix" ....r+y� �. t ♦'��. 'J
CVS VegPlot-27: MY -0 Spring 2017
CVS VegPlot-27:
MY -2
Oct 3,
2018

Rte, ... �'. r' _'.� +4. � }� .fes �...y dei, ,i r �(}. •.'iM�}��; � �... .�
6,brRi=. -''; `t,.J - -. � - _.. "p'.� - rri�� 15 +;�i�['4` •�i � �' �44 l�`'S. �.
_ r'nk'L'� �- :. ,s .c"r r�.tc�"•, �a'f[�7I�, 1x:�, ' .,'�r �� +.?�'�'5.:�.; ..
y :a. � � "�" �. � "�7" �`� � .y f „E; -. � -. x'40 ° ' j ��. . ��, . r _ i `•T9 Y_c r... i �Y�'4f . � � �.
_ '�t�° ,. t- ..tet _ ' �;, ..�s, .,� !.' :3 .p�'� •� ,� �•� ,fi � "'!��
v���'��4. `Ea�Nt L 1 .yf'' -✓�. � r '?47�:-�' �'- �r �l't. iJr�{, 5f .��•�. •.
CVS '' I i Spring 2017 CVS VegPlot-28:i
�- �+�ryi-: � Y + •F' � � w4�.'`r� 5 - f F+ �34 -•,r+{ r k. `r
41 'r
�� � � � R..'•., . � :.r'+�- �- rs.>' _�"�� � "- ..tea � :t .t �. �' f-"�� , r..-� a,`�?

Figure 3. Vegetation Plots: Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -1 (Oct 2017)
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -2 (2018) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

Figure 4. Photo Points: Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -2 (Fall 2018)

Figure 4. Photo Points: Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -2 (Fall 2018)

APPENDIX C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 6. Vegetation Plot Success Summary
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Stem Count Data
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -2 (2018) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration (TRHWR) Project, DMS # 97071.
Monitoring Year 2 (Oct 2018) -- Person County NC. Tar -Pam HUC# 03020101
Table 6. CVS Plot Stem Density and Success Summary
CVS Plot #
Wetland Planted
Stems
Planted + Volunteer
Stems
Invasive
Woody
Stems
Success
Criteria
Met?
per plot per acre
per plot per acre
97071-20
97071-21
97071 -22
97071-23
97071-24
97071-25
97071-26
97071-27
97071-28
7 283
13 526
0
1 Yes
No
o97071-22
5 202
7 283
0
8 324
18 728
0
-
Yes
12 486
15 607
0
Yes
4 162
4 162
0
No
8 324
8 324
0
Yes
9 364
9 364
0
Yes
9 364
12 486
0
Yes
10 405
10 405
0
Yes
Project Avg
1 8.0 1 324
10.7 432
0
Yes
Success Criteria based on planted + volunteer stems (count planted spp only): 320 stems
per acre at MY3, 260 stems/ac at MY5, and 210 stems/ac at MY7.

Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration (TRHWR) Project, DMS # 97071.
Monitoring Year 2 (Oct 2018) --Person County NC. Tar -Pamlico HUC# 03020101-0102.
Table 7. CVS Plot Stem Counts and Density by Species.
Plant = Planted Stems; Total = Planted + Volunteer Stems
Color codes for Plot Density & Success Quercus phellos and Q. nigra identifications were corrected in 2018.
Exceeds criteria by 10% or more (352 or more)
Exceeds criteria by less than 10% (320-351)
Fails criteria by less than 10% (289-319)
Fails criteria by more than 10% (288 or less)
Current Plot Data (MY2 - Oct 2018)
Current Plot Data (MY2 - Oct 2018)
Scientific Name
Scientific Name
Common Name
Growth
Type
97071-20
97071-21
97071-22
97071-23
97071-24
1 97071-25
Plant Total Plant Total Plant Total Plant Total Plant Total Plant Total
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree (P)
4
4
3
3
2
2
4
4
23
23
Carpinus caroliniana
Musclewood
Carpinus caroliniana
Musclewood
Tree (P)
2
2
4
4
6
6
6
6
6
6
Cornus amomum
Silky dogwood
Cornus amomum
Silky dogwood
Tree
1
1
Diospyros virginiana
Persimmon
Diospyros virginiana
Persimmon
Tree (P)
1
2
1
1
2
2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Tree (P)
1
2
1
1
3
8
2
3
1
1
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tulip Poplar
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tulip Poplar
Tree (P)
1
2
1
2
6
6
12
12
Liquidambar styraciflua
American sweetgum
Liquidambar styraciflua
American sweetgum
Tree
2
3
1
Nyssa biflora
Swamp Blackgum
Nyssa biflora
Swamp Blackgum
Tree (P)
1
1
Pinus taeda
Loblolly pine
Pinus taeda
Loblolly pine
Tree
3
3
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
Tree (P)
2
2
2
2
5
5
5
5
Quercus bicolor
Swamp White Oak
Quercus bicolor
Swamp White Oak
Tree (P)
4
4
2
2
1
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Tree (P)
1
2
2
1
1
3
3
2
2
7
7
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
Tree (P)
1
1
1
1
6
6
Ulmus americana
American Elm
Ulmus americana
American Elm
Tree (P)
5
4
1
5
4
11
2
10
10
(P) = planted species
Stem count
ares
acres
Species count
Stems per ACRE
(P) = planted species
Stem count
ares
acres
Species count
Stems per ACRE
7
13
5
7
8
18
12
15
4
4
8
8
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1
0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025
0.025
3 61 3 5 4 6 5 8 3 3 2
2
283 526 202 283 324 729 486 607 162 162 324
324
Plant = Planted Stems; Total = Planted + Volunteer Stems
Color codes for Plot Density & Success Quercus phellos and Q. nigra identifications were corrected in 2018.
Exceeds criteria by 10% or more (352 or more)
Exceeds criteria by less than 10% (320-351)
Fails criteria by less than 10% (289-319)
Fails criteria by more than 10% (288 or less)
Current Plot Data (MY2 - Oct 2018)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Growth
Type
97071-26
Plant Total
97071-27
Plant Total
97071-28
Plant Total
MY2 (2018)
Plant Total
MY1 (2017)
Plant Total
MYO (2017)
Plant Total
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree (P)
7
7
2
2
22
22
23
23
23
23
Carpinus caroliniana
Musclewood
Tree (P)
2
2
4
4
6
6
6
6
6
6
Cornus amomum
Silky dogwood
Tree
1
Diospyros virginiana
Persimmon
Tree (P)
1
3
2
2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Tree (P)
1
2
2
2
10
17
10
10
9
9
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tulip Poplar
Tree (P)
1
2
6
6
12
12
Liquidambar styraciflua
American sweetgum
Tree
3
Nyssa biflora
Swamp Blackgum
Tree (P)
1
1
Pinus taeda
Loblolly pine
Tree
3
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
Tree (P)
1
1
5
5
5
5
5
5
Quercus bicolor
Swamp White Oak
Tree (P)
4
4
3
3
3
3
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Tree (P)
2
2
2
2
17
18
1
1
14
14
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
Tree (P)
1
1
17
17
6
6
Ulmus americana
American Elm
Tree (P)
5
7
5
18
11
14
10
10
(P) = planted species
Stem count
ares
acres
Species count
Stems per ACRE
9
1
0.025
2
364
9
1
0.025
2
364
9
1
0.025
4
364
12
1
0.025
4
486
10
1
0.025
4
405
10
1
0.025
4
405
72
9
0.22
101
3241
96
9
0.22
13
4321
82
9
0.22
11
369
85
9
0.22
11
3821
91
9
0.222
111
409
91
9
0.222
11
409
Plant = Planted Stems; Total = Planted + Volunteer Stems
Color codes for Plot Density & Success Quercus phellos and Q. nigra identifications were corrected in 2018.
Exceeds criteria by 10% or more (352 or more)
Exceeds criteria by less than 10% (320-351)
Fails criteria by less than 10% (289-319)
Fails criteria by more than 10% (288 or less)

APPENDIX D. Hydrologic Data
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Figure 5. Monthly Rainfall Plot with Percentiles
Figure 6. Groundwater Gauge and Rainfall Data
Table 8. Hydrologic Success Attainment
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -2 (2018) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

Figure 5. Monthly Rainfall Totals (2018) with 30th and 70th Percentiles.
From USDA WETS table, 30 -year historical data (1981-2010) at ROXBORO 7 ESE, NC
Rainfall Data from NC-CRONOS Gauge # 317516, CoCoRaHS Gauges # PN -3 and PN -11
10.00
M
8.00
r ITI,
v
c 6.00
c
c 5.00
Q 4.00
v
a
3.00
1.00
1=1
Month
Total inches
30th P*
70th P*
Jan -18
3.59
2.45
4.46
Feb -18
2.31
2.58
3.82
Mar -18
4.65
2.99
5.32
Apr -18
5.80
2.18
4.21
May -18
7.57
2.51
4.04
Jun -18
6.56
2.15
4.45
Jul -18
3.87
3.38
5.44
Aug -18
7.84
2.57
4.90
Sep -18
8.96
1.94
4.85
Oct -18
6.35
2.65
4.72
Nov -18
8.40
1.89
4.42
Dec -18
2.56
4.52
TRH Wetland Restoration Site
2018 Monthly Rainfall and 30 -yr Normal Percentiles
Jan -18 Feb -18 Mar -18 Apr -18 May -18 Jun -18 Jul -18 Aug -18 Sep -18 Oct -18 Nov -18 Dec -18
Month 2018 Rainfall 2018 30th Percentile 70th Percentile
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -2 (2018) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

Figure 6A. Groundwater Gauges and Rainfall Data Plots 2018 -- Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration # 97071
60
40
m
= 20
a
O
3
-20
0
-40
-60
Jan -18 Feb -18 Mar18Apr18May 18 Jun -1S Jul -15 Aug 18 Sep -18 Oct18Nov-18 DecIS
Groundwater Depth (in) — — — 12 Inches Below Surface Precipitation (in)
TRH Wetland Restoration Site Gauge 'A` -MY2 (2018)
E! March Ist - May 5th (66 Consecutve
1110.1M
IN,
d"MMMI
11 ON, WL INVU1101.1b
111{�11jITYl1111110
113M
60
40
40
-60
Jan -18
TRH Wetland Restoration Site Gauge'B' -MY2 (2018)
60
40
d
= 20
s
d
0
-20
0
LD
-40
-60
Jan -18
_ 3
- 2.5
a
L
2
c
- 1.5
a
1 0
0.5
0
Feb -1S MarIs AprIS May Is Jun -1S Jul -18 Aug 18 Sep -1S Octis NovIS DecIS
Groundwater Depth (in) — — — 12 Inches Below surface Precipitation (in) I GW data incomplete, ends Au 1
TRH Wetland Restoration Site Gauge 'C' -MY2 (2018)
March Ist - May 14th (75 Consecutive
i
11YUJIM''aoffid
im
IN 111IFE11111
11111=112
Hfil
MORONI
NE
W11111111001
Feb -1S MarIS AprISMay-18 Jun -1S Jul -18 Aug 18 Sep -18 Oct18 NovIS DecIS
Groundwater Depth (in) — — — 12 Inches Below Surface Precipitation (in)
3.5
3
2.5
m
L
2 E
1.5 s
1 �
0.5
0
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -2 (2018) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

Figure 66. Groundwater Gauges and Rainfall Data Plots 2018 -- Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration # 97071
60.0
40.O
d
20.0
40.0
-60.0
Jan -18
TRH Wetland Restoration Site Gauge'D' -MY2 (2018)
March Ist - May 12th (73 consecutive
i
�TIRRIm�11�
tallEffilmllml
Ilk `1��JLMIVL71��Im�^�
i
WEREMAIM
■�'�
I'm,1mr,"M1n,
IN
11,11c'man,�i6'm"fi�Y�l�
1Iallol
RUN
"fill MRINJIMINE011,131=1
60.0
40.0
L
20.0
Y
o 0.0
3
-20.0
c�
40.0
-60.0
Jan -18
- 3.5
- 3
- z.s
d
L
R
c
- 1.5
- 1 �
_ D_5
0
Feb -18 MarIS Apr18May-18 Jun -18 Jul -18 Aug -18 Sep -18 Octis Nov18 DecIS
Groundwater Depth (in) — — — 12 Inches Below Surface Precipitation (in)
TRH Wetland Restoration Site Gauge 'E' -MY2 (2018)
60
40
a
= 20
-40
-60
Jan -18
Feb -18 MarIS AprIS May IS Jun -18 Jul -18 Aug IS Sep -18 OctIs NovIS Dec19
Groundwater Depth (in) — — — 12 Inches Below Surface Precipitation (in)
TRH Wetland Restoration Site Gauge'F' -MY2 (2018)
i
MIMIM
I'm, 11,11volan,
tallEffilmllml
NOirv�i�l 11WVA&=,VjLiUi1'Win,
,
MNYUJIMI
i
WEREMAIM
■�'�
60
40
a
= 20
-40
-60
Jan -18
Feb -18 MarIS AprIS May IS Jun -18 Jul -18 Aug IS Sep -18 OctIs NovIS Dec19
Groundwater Depth (in) — — — 12 Inches Below Surface Precipitation (in)
TRH Wetland Restoration Site Gauge'F' -MY2 (2018)
2
0.5
0
3
2.5
Y
L
2 C
C
1.5 Q
1 �
o_s
0
Feb -18 Mar18AprIS May IS Jun -18 Jul -18 Aug 18 Sep -18 Octis Nov18Dec19
Groundwater Depth (in) — — — 12 Inches Below Surface Precipitation (in) I GW data incomplete, ends Aug1
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -2 (2018) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI
4 g�i��.l��e
,Ifi.,�Ie��
■�'�
I'm,1mr,"M1n,
1Iallol
RUN
"fill MRINJIMINE011,131=1
2
0.5
0
3
2.5
Y
L
2 C
C
1.5 Q
1 �
o_s
0
Feb -18 Mar18AprIS May IS Jun -18 Jul -18 Aug 18 Sep -18 Octis Nov18Dec19
Groundwater Depth (in) — — — 12 Inches Below Surface Precipitation (in) I GW data incomplete, ends Aug1
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -2 (2018) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

Figure 6C. Groundwater Gauges and Rainfall Data Plots 2018 --Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration # 97071
60.0
40.0
m
c
TRH Wetland Restoration Site Gauge'G' -MY2 (2018)
l7
-40.0
-60.0
Jan -18 Feb -18 MarISApr18May-18 Jun -18 Jul -18 Aug -18 Sep -18 OctIsNov18DecIS
Groundwater Depth (in) — — — 12 Inches Below Surface Precipitation (in)
60
40
40
-60
Jan -1S Feb -18 MarIsApr-1S M ay -18 Jun -18 Jul -18 Aug IS Sep -18 Oct is Nov18 Dec18
Groundwater Depth (in) — — — 12 Inches Below Surface Precipitation (in)
TRH Wetland Restoration Site Gauge'H' -MY2 (2018)
60
40
m
= 20
-40
-60
Jan -18 Feh-18 MarIs AprIS May Is Jun -18 Jul -18 Aug 18 Sep -18 Octis Nov18 DecIS
Groundwater Depth (in) — — — 12 Inches Below Surface Precipitation (in)
TRH Wetland Restoration Site Gauge'I' -MY2 (2018)
-5 March Ist - May 3rd (64 Consecutive
i
LWI
Iffi.,1111MIR,
M. - M - W. M_�
1111011,1121llM12'NNIM1
NE
11ijusim,
mimim,
11allEffiffliml
11=10,11110JE111111M
M211111WIMEN11,131M
60
40
m
= 20
-40
-60
Jan -18 Feh-18 MarIs AprIS May Is Jun -18 Jul -18 Aug 18 Sep -18 Octis Nov18 DecIS
Groundwater Depth (in) — — — 12 Inches Below Surface Precipitation (in)
TRH Wetland Restoration Site Gauge'I' -MY2 (2018)
-5 March Ist - May 3rd (64 Consecutive
LWI
Iffi.,1111MIR,
1111011,1121llM12'NNIM1
NE
1111,1111M
3.5
3
2.5
m
2
1.5
1 �
0.5
0
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -2 (2018) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

Figure 6D. Groundwater Gauges and Rainfall Data Plots 2018 --Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration # 97071
60.0
40.0
TRH Wetland Restoration Site Gauge 'J' -MY2 (2018)
40.0
-60.0
Jan -18 Feb -18 Mar18Apr18May 18 Jun -18 Jul -18 Aug 18 Sep -18 OctIla NovIS Dec18
Groundwater Depth (in) — — — 12 Inches Below Surface Precipitation (in)
40.0
E 20.0
C 0.0
3
-20.0
C7
40.0
600
TRH Wetland Restoration Site Gauge 'K' -MY2 (2018)
- 3
2.5
W
r
2 c
c
1.5
1
0.5
0
Jan -18 Feb -1S MarIs AprIS May Is Jun -18 JuF18 Aug 18 Sep -18 Octis NovIS Dec19
Groundwater Depth (in) — — — 12 Inches Below Surface Precipitation {in) I GW data Incomplete, ends Oct26
60.0
40.0
d
L
� 20.0'
L
Q
c 0.0
L
_ -20.0
O
C7
40.0
-60.0
Jan -18 Feb -18 MarIS Apr18 May Is Jun -1S JuF18 Aug IS Sep -1S Octis Nov19 Dec18
Groundwater Depth (in) — — — 12 Inches Below Surface Precipitation (in)
TRH Wetland Restoration Site Gauge'L' -MY2 (2018)
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -2 (2018) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI
I� 3111�IRJ�'1i61��
- 3
2.5
W
r
2 c
c
1.5
1
0.5
0
Jan -18 Feb -1S MarIs AprIS May Is Jun -18 JuF18 Aug 18 Sep -18 Octis NovIS Dec19
Groundwater Depth (in) — — — 12 Inches Below Surface Precipitation {in) I GW data Incomplete, ends Oct26
60.0
40.0
d
L
� 20.0'
L
Q
c 0.0
L
_ -20.0
O
C7
40.0
-60.0
Jan -18 Feb -18 MarIS Apr18 May Is Jun -1S JuF18 Aug IS Sep -1S Octis Nov19 Dec18
Groundwater Depth (in) — — — 12 Inches Below Surface Precipitation (in)
TRH Wetland Restoration Site Gauge'L' -MY2 (2018)
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -2 (2018) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

Figure 6E. Groundwater Gauges and Rainfall Data Plots 2018 --Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration # 97071
60.0
40.0
20.0
c 0.0
-20.0
c7
40.0
_60.0
Jan -18 Feb -18 Mar -18
TRH Wetiand Restoration REFERENCE Gauge -MY2 (2018)
March Ist - May 14th (75 Corsecutive
i
Apr -18 May IS Jun -18 Jul -18 Aug -18 Sep -18 Oct -18 Nov -18 Dec -18
Groundwater Depth (in) — — — 12 Inches Below Surface Precipitation (in)
3.5
3
2.5
d
r
2
c
1.5 �
Z,
1
0.5
0
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -2 (2018) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI
Apr -18 May IS Jun -18 Jul -18 Aug -18 Sep -18 Oct -18 Nov -18 Dec -18
Groundwater Depth (in) — — — 12 Inches Below Surface Precipitation (in)
3.5
3
2.5
d
r
2
c
1.5 �
Z,
1
0.5
0
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -2 (2018) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

Table 8. Hydrologic Success Attainment, Groundwater Wells
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Mitigation Site # 97071.
Mitigation Plan success criterion is 10% of growing season (consecutive days
< 12" below surface).
Growing Season based on USDA air temp data at Roxboso ESE gauge is Mar
28 to Nov 3 (221 Days).
Growing Season used here, based on on-site soil temperature > 41' F is Mar
1 to Nov 3 (248 Days).
10% of 248 -day growing season is 25 consecutive days.
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101
MY2 2018
Gage #
Growing
Season
Monitored
Total # Days
WT < 12" from
surface
Max Consec
Days <12"
from surface
Success
Critera
Attained?
A
100%
158 (64%)
66 (27%)
Yes
D
100%
161 (65%)
73 (29%)
Yes
E
100%
148 (60%)
64 (26%)
Yes
F
62%
94(38%)
65 (26%)
Yes
G
100%
137 (55%)
70 (28%)
Yes
H
100%
181 (73%)
101 (41%)
Yes
1
100%
144 (58%)
64 (26%)
Yes
J
98%
159 (64%)
73 (29%)
Yes
K
97%
128 (52%)
64 (26%)
Yes
L
100%
170 (69%)
101 (41%)
Yes
B
62%
108 (44%)
98 (40%)
NA
C
100%
152 (61%)
75 (30%)
NA
REF
100%
174 (70%)
75 (30%)
Yes
Mitigation Plan success criterion is 10% of growing season (consecutive days
< 12" below surface).
Growing Season based on USDA air temp data at Roxboso ESE gauge is Mar
28 to Nov 3 (221 Days).
Growing Season used here, based on on-site soil temperature > 41' F is Mar
1 to Nov 3 (248 Days).
10% of 248 -day growing season is 25 consecutive days.
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101
MY -2 (2018) Annual Monitoring Report
Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI
1
REF
2$ 30
r
29J L
�
F 41
1
i
1 -
,
1 Reestablish � �
1
� 26 1
'
j
G 28 41
+� 1
Exlstkng 1
1
D
Wetland 1
26 F j
lRehabilitation) II E 26
1
1
1 029
I
1
I
1 {Oro
�
I
1 'r
C
'
30 11
I
1 A
1
ti0
27 i non
-we tlandN
1 Reestab4sh t
•-
y
1
- - - - - - -
Percent -of 2018 -growing seas -on
�N
with consecutive days of VVT at
1 x
-12 inches or higher.
x
0 feet 200 44DO
MY -2 (2018) Annual Monitoring Report
Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI