19910185 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19910202

MEMO
TO: 1 '? N
DATE:
SUBJECT:> ??c`t?N 1 `°"?rT

C 1-7

L IS G 'E-t .IL G zs Cwt S L`?? 7`U ?? C
From:---
SWE o,
North Carolina Department of Environment,
.?:a?. Health, and Natural Resources e?q printed on Recycled Paper'

a STATF: <>:,
V N r ,:? .
,_
State of North
Department of Environment, Healt - ,
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh,j N
James G. Martin, Governor
February 27, 1992
Dr. G. Wayune Wright
Corps of Engineers
P. 0. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Dear Dr. Wright:

William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
In keeping with your request, this office has circulated to interested
state review agencies U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Public Notice Action ID
199103076 dated August 29, 1991 describing a proposed project by the U. S.
..Forest Service. The project, involving wetland fill and dike construction
'within an existing waterfowl impoundment, is located adjacent Catfish Lake, in
Groatan National Forest, in Jones County.
Based on a coordinated agency reveiw, the state interposes no objection
to the project nor suggests any substantive project changes. Key agency input
is, however, provided for the record as follows:
Division of Environmental Management - issued the required Section
4.0'1'°•Water Quality Certification on February 11. Certification No.
.`.2691. includes important environmental safeguards;
Division of Environmental Health -.recommends the USDA register the
imp6 tment with that agency's vector control section so as to
become aware of mosquito breeding control options. Contact Ms.
Linda Sewall at 9i9l,733-2870;
Division of Land Resources - directly notified the applicant early
in the review process of the need for a sedimentation and erosion
control plan to be submitted. We assume DLR requirements have been
metby now.
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
fines -a W2
and Natural Resourcf
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

iI
I
I
i
?i

..

Aa.

?
'! .? .
.?.??,
' ..
??a
it
i
{ _.
.Y ..
Y
?.; ? .. -
`E ? F

Dr. G. Wayne Wright
Page 2
February 27, 1992
Should you require additional input from the state on this matter, do not
hesitate to contact this office or the responding agency.
Very sincerely,

Joh R. Parker, Jr.
Inland '404 Coordinator
??'`
?•.
-?
i%? . £> i
i •i =.
a ??
f.
-?.!?

STATF°
u? .
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
February 11, 1992
R. Paul Bullard
Croatan National Forest
141 East Fisher Avenue
New Bern, North Carolina 28560
near Mr, Bullard:
George T Everett, Ph.D.
Director
Subject: Certification Pursuant to Section 401 of the Federal
Clean Water Act,
Proposed ditching and dike construction for
subimpoundments
Catfish Lake Waterfowl Impoundment
Project. 91636., COE #l 1991003076
Jones County
Attached hereto is a copy of. Certification No. 2691 issued
to U.S. Forest Service, Croatan National Forest dated February 7,
1992. 4
if we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to
contact us.

Sincerely,
George T. Everett
Attachments
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps,of Engineers Washington Regional. Office
Washington DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Mr. John Parker
Central Files
Asheville Fayetteville
704/251-6208 919/4861541
REGIONAL OFFICES
Mooresville Raleigh WashintAon Wilmington Winston-Salem
7041663-1690 919/571-11 iK) 919/946-6481 919/395-39(X) 919/8967007
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.U. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 276204)535 Telephone [phone]
An Iatnal 01,1-,x itv Attirmao- /V i,,n Employer
} `'
?:
y).
I
NORTH CAROLINA
f :Jones County
CERTIFICATION
THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements
of Section 401 Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the United States
and subject to the North Carolina Division of Environmental
Management Regulations in 15 NCAC 2H, Section .0500 to U. S.
Forest Service, Croatan National Forest pursuant to an
application filed on the 13 day of September, 1991 for ditching
and'construction of dikes to create subimpoundments in Catfish
Lake Waterfowl Impoundment.
The Application provides adequate assurance that the
discharge of fill material into the waters of Catfish Lake
waterfowl impoundments in conjunction with the proposed
subimpoundments in Jones County will not result in a violation of
applicable Water Quality Standards and discharge guidelines.
Therefore, the State of North Carolina certifies that this
activity will not violate Sections 301, 302, 303, 306, 307 of PL
92-500 and PL 95-217 if conducted in accordance with the
application and conditions. hereinafter set forth.
Condition(s) of Certification:
1. That the activity be conducted in such a manner as to
prevent significant increase in turbidity outside the area.
of construction or construction related discharge (increases
such that the turbidity in the Stream is 25 NTU's or less
,are not considered significant).
2. Spoil. shall be disposed of on upland sites or used to build
the dikes but not otherwise placed in water or wetlands.
Violations of any condition herein set forth shall result in
revocation of this Certification.
This Certification shall become null and void unless the above
conditions are made conditions of the Federal Permit.
This the ll.day of February, 1992.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
i
George T. Everett, Director
WQC#( 2691
--? ? hvJ
p
•? Quw ?•
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
225 North McDowell Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
September 10, 1991
MEMORANDUM
c
T0: Dr. George T. Everett, Director Q. r? d m? C\J
Division of Environmental Management o vj (J ne 4, W
c
61
FROM: Johm R, Parker, Jr. (9 3 a
Inland "404" Coordinator 9S £ Z ?,
SUBJECT: "404" Project Review
Roger N. Schecter
Director
The attached U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Public Notice, for Action No. 199103076
dated August 29,'1991 describing a project proposed by The U.S. Dept. of Agriculture
is bein circulated to interested state agencies for comments on applicable Section
404 and?or Section 10 permits.
Please indicate below.your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project
and return this form by September 30, 1991. If you have any questions regarding the
proposed project, please contact me at 733-2293. When appropriate, in-depth
comments with supporting data is requested.
1E/)
project
REPLY This offices?tpperis the pro? proposal.
..No comment.
Comments on this project are attached.
This office objects to the project as proposed.
Signed Date
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
U.S. ARMY COE 404 PUBLIC NOTICE OR NATIONWIDE PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW
PROJECT NAME.
COUNTY: PROJECT #: ,?O y G ^
STREAM ADJAC NT WATER BODY: G(?' Gt31C?J?a Cf?t.?, J..n CLASJ-S -?
BASIN :
'404' PUBLIC NOTICE: (Y OR N)
NVIONWIDE PERMIT: (Y OR N) #
PROJECT DESCRIPTION.- .&,a. .,- -0
s
ASSIGNED! TO:
DATE APP. REC'D.: (YY/MM/DD)
INITIAL REPORT: (YY/MM/DD) RECOMMENDATION: 024 ?
FINAL REPORT: (YY/MM/DD) (ISSUE/DENY/OTHER)
WATER QUALITY CERT. (401)
CERT. REQ'D: (Y OR N) -MERAL IF YES: CERT:?(Y OR N)
TYPE GEN: INDIVIDUAL CERT:
(BULKHEAD, BOAT RAMP, ETC.)

IqLl
j..
SEWAGE DISPOSAL
TYPE OF DISPOSAL PROPOSED: 1Y TJ
(EXISTING, PROPOSED SEPTIC TANK, ETC.)
TO BE PERMITTED BY: .(DEM, DHS, COUNTY)
IF BY DEM, IS SITE AVAILABLE AND PERMIT ISSUANCE.PROBABLE?_(Y OR N)
,WATER/WETLAND FILL
AREA OF FILL: WATER:
WETLAND : Q t,?) L
IS FILL ELIMINATING A SIGNIFICANT USE? (:Y OR N)
DREDGING
IS DREDGING ACTIVITY EXPECTED TO CAUSE A SIGNIFICANT LOSS OF
RESOURCE? (Y OR N)
IS SPOIL DISPOSAL ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED?. (Y OR N)
SEQUENCING
IS SEQUENCING REQUIRED? (Y OR N)
PRACTICABLE ALTERNATIVE? (Y OR N)
MINIMIZATION OF IMPACTS? (Y OR N)
MITIGATION PROPOSED? (Y OR N)
COMMENTS
RECD *UMED CONDITIONS OR PERMIT RESTRICTIONS:
cc: WaRO - Dorney - Central Files - COE

Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Action ID No. 199103076
August 29, 1991
THE U. N. AEPARTMEAT OF AGRICULTURE, FOREST SERVICE, CROATAN NATIONAL
FOREST, 141 East fisher Avenue, New Bern, North Carolina 18560, has applied
for a Department of the Army (DA) permit TO PLACE EXCAVATED MATERIAL IN
WETLANDS RESULTING PROM DITCHING AND DIKE CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH SUB-
IMPOUNDMENTS WITHIN CATFISH LAKE WATERFOWL IMPOUNDMENT, Jones County, North
Carolina.
The following description of the work is taken from information provided
by the applicant and from observations made during an onsite visit by a
representative of the Corps of Engineers. Plans and other data submitted with
-the application show that the existing impoundment has been ditched for
drainage and hat four flashboard-risers and two bisecting dikes to form three,
255-acre sub-impoundments. One sub-impoundment is kept flooded and the other
two. are managed for moist soil plants. The proposed work involves excavation,
by dxagline and backhoe, of a central control ditch along the alignment of an
existing ditch, to bisect each field and form six sub-impoundments. The
existing ditch is to be deep9hed and widened. ]approximately 46,000 cubic
yards of excavated material is to be place in a 92-foot-wide, 8,000-loot-long
area. Dikes are to be constructed on each side of the central control ditch
to establish a "yank" effect and provide for efficient control of hydrology.
The "tank" can be filled to create head pressure and increase flow rates. The
central ditch is to access each field independently, and access points are to
be controlled by flaohboard-risers so that each field may be independently
flooded or drained. Nino water control devices are to be installed within
dikes. Dikes are to be graded to a 3 to 1 slopes and seeded with local
vegetation. The purpose of the work is to more effectively control water
elevations for impoundment management with minimal impact on surrounding
pocosins, Catfish Lake and natural hydrology. plans showing the work are
included with this public notice.
The State of North Carolina will review this public notice to determine
the need for the applicant to obtain any required State authorisation. No DA
permit will be issued until the coordinated state viewpoint on the proposal
has been received and reviewed by this agency, nor will a DA permit be issued
until the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (DIM) has
determined the applicability of a water Quality,Certificate as required by PL
92-500.
This application is being considered
Water Act (33 tJ.B.C. 1344 pursuant to section 404 of the Clean
comment )• Any person may request, in,writing within the
period specified in the notice, that a public hearing be held to
consider this application. Requests for public hearing shall state, with
particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing.
file. Con • Do Not Remove from Foldor
'.`•-•n .JI --VJILL bill iv tU1vNii1v i vil. _. .. _.. .?. ... _ -. - / VG/ ll._.
' -
-2-
The District Engineer has consulted the latest published version of the
National Register of Historic Places for the presence or absence of registered
properties, or proportion listed as being eligible for inclusion therein, and
this worksite is not registered property or property listed as being eligible
for inclusion in the Register. Consultation of the National Register
constitutes the extent of cultural resource investigations.by the District
Engineer, and he is otherwise unaware of the presence of such'resources.
Pressintly, unknown archaeological, scientific, prehistorical, or historical
data may be lost or destroyed by work under the requested permit.
Thi District Engineer, based on available information, is not aware that
the proposed activity will affect species, or their critical habitat,
designated as endangered or threatened pursuant to the Endangered Species Act
of 1973.
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of
tho-probable impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity
and its intended use on the public interest. Evaluation of the probable
impacts which the proposed activity may have on the public interest requires a
careful weighing.of all those factors which become relevant in each particular
case. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the
proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The
decisionrhether to authorize a proposal, and if so the conditions under which
it will bi allowed to occur, are therefore determined by the outcome of the
general balancing process. That decision should reflect the national concern
for both protection and utilization of important resources. All. factors which
may be relevant to_ the proposal must be considered including the cumulative
effects thereof. Among those are conservation, economics, aefthetics, general
environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values,"fiah and wildlife values,
flood hazards: and flood plain values (in accordance with Executive Order
11988), land use, navigation, shore erosion and accretion, recreation, water
supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber
production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in
general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving the
placement of dredged or fill materials in waters of the united States, a
permit will be denied if the discharge that would be authorized by such permit
would not comply with the Environmental ProtectioW Agencies' 404(b)(1)
guidelines. Subject to the preceding sentence and any other applicable
guidelines or criteria, a permit will be granted unless the District Engineer
determines that it would be contrary to;the public interest.
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal,
state and local agencies.and officials; Indian Tribes and other interested
parties in order to consider and evaluate, the impacts of this proposed
activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers
to determine whether to issue, modify, condition, or deny a permit for this
a -
-3-
proposal. To make this decision, 'comments are used to aasess impacts on
.-.endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental
effects and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments may be
used for preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the
National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are also used to determine the
need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the
proposed activity.
The applicant has prepared an Environmental Assessment, pursuant to the
National Environmental Policy Act. Further information regarding this
document may be obtained by contacting Mr. Paul sullard, District Ranger, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; New Bern, North Carolina 28560,
telephone [phone].
Generally, the decision whether to issue this DA permit will not be made
until the DEM issues, denies, or waives State certification required by
sgation 401 of the Clean Water Act. The DEN considers whether or not the
proposed activity will comply with Sections 301, 302, 306, and 307 of the
Clean Water Act. The application and this public notice for the DA permit
serves as application to the DIM for certification.
Additional information regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be
reviewed at the offices of the Environmental Operations Section, DEN,
Salisbury Street, Archdale Building, Raleigh, North Carolina. Copies of such
materials will be furnished to any person requesting copies upon payment of
reproduction costs.
The DEN plans to take final action in the issuance of the Clean Water Act
certification on or after September 20, 1991.
All persons desiring to make comments regarding the. application for Clean
Water hot certification should do so in writing delivered to the DIM, Post
Office Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 17611-7687, on or before September
16, 1991, Attentions Mr. John Dorney.
Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will
- be received in this office, Attentions Mr. Norm Sanders, until 4siS p.m.,
September 30, 1991, or telephone [phone].

mod.{ M

?LCIItAT10N o

tlliCl ?t?tt t
CA"MVI
UNA ftioll 3 90 •
hlNt11! * f
NA1V1000 y/iNpiNp S t ? f ?' i
Ntult 111vt• +ti t
. • ? • •; n ! w
??NtCllrr 7 ? • f • f J A ... _ ? _.

•Mt Soto ! ¦t+t¦ ttAf•„n?,

.uVhC¦ SA W
¦
191-AND CRI="It ANAR
r, ' 1
r_,?r:sT SY.,! .; 1 •,..^a'fATICN,
I ;
C r a t p °?'? ??-
lrta .'s CROATAN NATIONAL FOREST
??. CATFISH LAKE N
?111?OU?Ld111e11 WATERFOWL IMPOUNDMENT 1Mt,cp?c ? M v
PROJECT 1991
L
I
Pro e c t
I ?v
_ ; ?*• 115
- t '•
a" LAW HAVttA K •
?"• Cr1AVift CO?NtY • r??•?
• Lr___ __r •_ r r ??r __ r ..?ow¦.rr____-rr____J..
T CA11ti tT COUNTY
•
1 ,? M?rp?t • •
lt1 i
1
t
1
?4 Opt
C DAS POINT 24 -- -^.?'._"?.•• L.?.. CI; ?.•
A t0i NO TRAIL - '" ???' `• `-
•' ? ? OO?UE f?Uiav ?r+ti,r-?r?ry''t
SwAnspond
ATLANTIC OCEAN
Sosler 1/4 ' equals 1 mile
• 5??r 2. o,?' S'
..-.?.. ?I ,._, +j1.. I . I ,,•r ? r S ' .. , r.?_.? .. • r ...N lfvl
w _
t? `?4 ' P r . a= rs';)?jr?`?jpt l !? rt? .r r.'i' '?. •,„. rt.• i?+ .. . ='j •h •? .??.?. .• • - f• .. « r
! ?;?11'rj } j??• (JAS+F?itr *^?. '?n _. •1 't,N ,r,•'•. r? rl•, y• ?t? •" ~ ? •
.,?r• ... ?.::./ ..;. ... ...?• _-w rr'??.h_+•# .• r.•n'r_n ?.v r. _ ;«, rs ai' • r'- ?r•='? "r '•' ?~•?
" 'r't .? x :: ?_. r•'' ... •"- • ?? ,?, ~'=?:.:'h i ? ?-•.^? .'? +-.? ??= a. ?»• ='••? y' w? ?? •.- ma'r' .
'. t a ••S.' •. +? + r rr? ..fem. +?`«V + w? r t'. ` i `r??#.w ?+ +?? r. i r
lb.
wl let- 4o..
ia.
•?`'-r. ..r~?'.r.., a'-f•-„?^.•.. .w yr. w y: "•'.. •r?
rr -..f •.l '« '?+±' +' '.'._
.71
it .4-
t:2? 4t
40ooo,o,A _Z VV.
tR - r'•?.•; ? ?t ? '?ihw ?.•I. ?.M,. y. ?'r• .? -,. y. ? r' .•?+ r .•??.?, r r • ? ?+. .. -,
imp
NA.
.•, = w, it .r •.? •?•' ., •• •• - ••?.- •• „ •h` ..:' .. W •.:..
-Prdposed
•r•+- •. .,F y 1+. ` y + ?:.?
• - ?w? •
is Ditch
46
CIF ~'.• '~ ?1. /•^r•1 ? ? ? ? ? h _ I
Construction -.-?-
?h ?
40
R ?

?r

' •
'? fir
!/ ??`??
`
• ?y_
J ?
x
i i
CROATAN NATIONAL. FpREST
CATFISH LAKE
WATERFOWL IMPOUNDMENT
PROJECT 1991
11
,.1

c?

W :

A , 4

t ?
1
jI `\? in ,•
,'ter •-' ??
c +?? r
AND
- • r
1 1T? •w-_??:
r •
•.•.'
•
v ...
I
`M y, f

a
w
,n
O
R+
Rt
y
Si&*-r 4L•• of s'
-C'

?-
---- ---- - -- -

- till
<
'N _

Lli
\ee
rnwl?

^"

?

W .
le -7
O: H
O

O'
V I V ? ??
+?w_ W
LL

O E+
t?G7?
,
a,

- o
elm*
u
0
?w

w W to
? 4 O
, 46 't
.? C p
d

!A
.?t7_.

V
O?
N
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
September 10, 1991

?µ+Jpb* • . ? IN REPLY REFER TO S: NO
Regulatory Branch
Action ID. 1991003076
.? Mr." John Dorney
Water Quality Section
' Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
! 'heasr Mr. Dorney:
i

lyklp -A
7991
BUS ?
-n R
`a ch -
Enclosed is the application of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service, Croatan National Forest, for Department of the Army authorization and
a State Water Quality Certification to place excavated material in wetlands
resulting from ditching and dike construction to establish sub-impoundments
within Catfish Lake Waterfowl Impoundment, Jones County, North Carolina. Your
receipt, of this letter verifies your acceptance of a valid request for
certification in accordance with Section 325.2(b)(ii) of our administrative
regulations.
We are considering authorizing the proposed activity pursuant to Section
404 of the C1ean.Water Act, and we have determined that a water quality
certification may be required under the provisions of Section 401 of the same
law. A Department of the Army permit will not be granted until the
certification has been obtained or waived.
In accordance with our administrative regulations, 60 days after receipt
of a request for certification is a reasonable time for State action.
Therefore, if you have not acted on the request by November 11, 1991, the
District Engineer will deem that waiver has occurred.
Questions or comments may be addressed,to Mr. Norm Sanders, telephone
[phone].
Sincerely,
ne Wri toryy Chie Regul Branch
Enclosure
d
('S c
• Ff . -2-
Copy Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr John Parker
Division of Coastal Management
•. Noorth Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office-Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
SUSPENSE
a
U ca you`
ARREN STARNES
WILDLIFE BIOLOGIST
R ATAN AND UWHARRIE
TIONAL FOREST
US FOREST SERVICE.
141 E. FISHER AVE
NEW BERN. N.C.26860 [phone]
? X676
ISIB
REGULATORY Blml cl1
404 PERMIT APPLICATION
TO
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON REGULATORY BRANCH
FROM
CROATAN NATIONAL FOREST
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA
FOR
CATFISH LAKE WATERFOWL IMPOUNDMENT HABITAT
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
4

FS-6200.28(7.82)
United States
Department of
Agriculture
Reply to: 2631
Date: August 15, 1991
Forest Croatan
Service Ranger
District
141 E. Fisher Avenue
New Bern, NC 28580
Mr. G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Branch
Dept of the. Army
Wilmington District
Corps of Engineers
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, N.C. 28402-1890
Dear Mr. Wright:
The Croatan National Forest proposes to sub-impound the Catfish Lake Waterfowl
Inpoundment, located on the Forest in Eastern Jones County North Carolina. The
Forest request a 404 permit from your office. Attached please find the project
Environmental Assesment, "Fonsi", location maps, plan view, and cross section of
the proposed project.
This letter is the extension of the North Carolina attached application form.
BACKGROUND
The Catfish Lake Waterfowl Impoundment in Jones county is part of the Forest
Waterfowl Management Program. Catfish Lake, Great Lake, and Long Lake along
with the Impoundment are part of this managed system. All Lakes and the
Impoundment are within the 100,000 acres of fresh water pocosins managed by the
forest. The impoundment and.lakes are not tidal influence Great Lake, Catfish
Lake have existing drainiage control systems. Catfish Lake and the impoundment
are connected by a ditch system.
The land and resource management plan for Croatan National Forest directs:
"Feature Waterfowl; er4ance opportunities to manage waterfowl and fisheries
through habitat improvements." The funds used for purchase of the impoundment
in the 1970's were labled by congress "to maintain the area for recreation
use". Of the 100,000 acres of pocosins on the forest, the impoundment
represents only 1.24% that is actively managed.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The existing impoundment is currently ditched for drainiage and has 4
flash-board-rizers and two bisecting dikes that make 3 sub impoundments of
approximately '255 acres each. One is kept flooded and the other two are managed
for moist soil plants. Some "natural pocosin vegetation" exist within the
impoundment; and is managed by burning and flooding.
The natural hydrology of the area was disrupted before purchase by the
forest. Road building in the 70's and 80's caused further disruption. Recovery
of hydrology began in 1989 with the filling of several ditches and
U?$ FS•6200-29(7-82)
installationof control structures to raise the water level in existing road
ditches. Redirection of run-off flows into original watersheds was also
?. (,,,,started.PROPOSED CHANGES
The main objective of the project is to effectively put water where it is
needed with minimal impact to the impoundment and surrounding pocosins, Catfish
,,Lake, and the natural hydrology.
The three sub-impoundments are not level. They were designed for ease Wf
drainage instead of efficient water use. The impoundment is flooded by
pumping. Cascade flooding is necessary to fill the entire area. Water cannot
be added to the lowest fields without filling the higher ones. To solve this it
is proposed to:
1. Build a central control ditch that bisects each field creating 6 sub
impoundments.
2. The ditch will follow an existing drainage ditch.
3. Two dikes, one on each side of the ditch, will create a tank effect.
This.tank can be.filled to create head pressure, increasing flow rates,
there by increasing efficiently.
4. The central ditch will access each field independently. It could be
used to flood or drain each field independently. The access points
will be *)ntrol by flash-board-rizers.
s- .
5. The construction will require deepening and widening the existing ditch
and depositing the soil on either side.
6. Approximately 45,000 cubic yards of material will be moved within an
area 92' wide by 8,000' long.
7. Nine water controll devices will be installed in the dikes.
8.. All dike back-slopes will be 3:1 grades and seeded with local
vegetation.
9. The construction is proposed for- the winter of 1991-92
10. Construction will be a joint effort of the US Forest Service, North
Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and Duck Unlimited.
STEPS TAKEN AND IN PROCESS
The forest road maintenance and culvert replacement program has been used to
replace culverts with flash-board-rizers and re-direct drainage into natural
watersheds. The rizers have razed water levels in ditches, lessening impacts on
surrounding pocosin areas. With these changes and upgrading existing controll
devices a buffer system has been created so drainage of the impoundment does not
overwhelm its natural watershed, the gill Creek system, and upper- Trent Ri•r7ix.
MITIGATION
The forest contains many miles of ditches, draining several thousand acres
of wetlands. Restoration of natural hydrology within these wetlands will take
U?S FS-8200.28(7-82)
place
as opportunities arise. This will be done as funding of projects make it
l ossible, or as mitigation for other projects. In the past 2 years, as part of
he over-all recovery efforts related to the impoundment, approximately 10 miles
of ditches have been plugged or controlled.
It is proposed thait any needed mitigation for this project take into
consideration this on-going work. The next priority for ditch plugging is 4
plus miles of existing ditches adjacent to the project area, draining an area of
1/2 mile by 4 miles. Together these efforts should more than compensate for all
unavoidable impacts the project creates.
CONCLUSION
The forest service personnel involved believe that that the slow, (5 yrs)
methotical approach taken to develop this project proves that all concerns can
be incorporated into the final plans of the project. All other practicable
alternatives were considered and eliminated in due process and a clean logical
program developed.
Many proposals were entertained to accomplish this project. They range from
abandon the impoundment to completely rebuild the entire systems, drilling
wells, enlarge the impounded area, seasonally draining Catfish Lake and farra it,
lay ceament structures to handle water, lazer lever all the fields, increase the
size and height of existing dikes, and manage only one field. Most of the
proposals were eliminated because they were out side the authority of of the
forest, out side the forest plan financially beyond the forest's ability in
todays' economy, or not within forest service regulations and guidelines. The
environmental assessment evaluated only those considered feasible. (see
attached E.A.) The analysis imposed on this project shows that it will
minimally effect existing wetlands, but as part of an overall recovery program
will,mprove the surrounding pocosins through more efficient management.
No engineering plans have been finalized due to the investment required.
This investment cannot take place until a permit is issued. The Forest Service
is flexible in this planning and can easily adjust to any permit requirements.
Any advice by the Corp toward the forest recovery efforts of the hydrology would
be.gladly received.
We have many future plans that will require close coordination between
agencies and we look forward to a profitable relationship.
Sincerely,
R. PAUL BULLARD
District Ranger
U?S FS-8200-28(7.82)

glease type print. Carefully describe all an- d. DjescP*be tpie planned use of the project.
o ene it waterfowl for recreational
ticipace4 development activities, including construe- ?? use an improve water or recrg in the
Lion, excavation, filling, paving, land clearing, and area SEE ATTACHED LETTER)
stor>iwatprXontrol. If the requested informatioud s
not relevant to your project, write NIA (not ap-?
plicable) Items 1-4 and 8-9 must be completed fo,\?a
WtAND AND WATER
all projects. CCTERISTICSr•?
1 •=APPLICANT - - • --' " -? -? Y-" ' a. Size of entire tract 820 acres
Croatan National Forest b. Size of individual lot(s)
a. Name
Address 141 E Fisher Ave
Ciry New Bern State NC_
Zip 28560 Day phone [phone]
X Landowner or Authorized agent
b. Pro ect name (if any Catfish Lake
l aterfowl Impoundment Project
c. If the applicant is not the landowner, also give
the owner's name and address.
2 LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT -
a. Street address or secondary road number
East Jones County
b. City, town, community, or landmark
Croatan National Forest
C. County Craven
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? No
e. Name of body of water nearest project
Catfish Lake
(SEE ATTACHED MPS)
3 DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED.
_ USE OF PROPOSED PROJECT ;
Describe all development activities you propose
(for example, building a home, motel, marina,
bulkhead, or pier). .
Construct a dike.
(See attached letter and evironmental
0„+-1
If you plan to build a marina, also complete
and attach Form DCM-MP-2.,
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an ex-
isting. project, new work, or both)
C. Will the project be for community, private, or
commercial use?
Community
c. Elevation of tract above mean sea level or Na-
tional Geodetic Vertical Datum 13' to 14' ASL
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract Croatan
Muck to Murville Mvrlr w/some clay.
e. Vegetation on tract Pocosin to vlanted__
fields
f. Man-made features now on tract Totally
graded, ditched, for farming w/dikes&riser
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan Classifica-
tion of the site? (Consult the local land use
plan.) •
Conservation Transitional
Developed X Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
i. How are adjacent waters classified?
j. Has a professional archaeological survey been
carried out for the tract? es
If so, by whom? Rodney Snedeker, USES
5 UPLAND DEVELOPMENT : .2``
Complete this section if the project includes any
upland development.
a. Type and number of buildings, facilities, or
structures proposed
b. Number of lots or parcels
c. Density (Give the number of residential units
and the units per acre.)
d. Size of area to be graded or disturbed
e. If the proposed project will disturb more than
one acre of land, the Division of Land
Resources must receive an erosion and sedimen-
tation control plan at least 30 days before land
disturbing activity begins. If applicable, has a
sedimentation and erosion control plan been
submitted to the Division of Land Resources?
f. Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet
of mean high water to be covered by im-
permeable surfaces, such as pavement,
buildings, or rooftops.
1 r
g. List materials, such as marl, paver stone,
• asphalt, or concrete, to be used for paved
Surface will be rough aggregate
siedcABG marrow and will require 1,185 yds.3
h, I' apply-:, ble, has a stortnwater management
plan.-been submitted to the Division of En-
vironmental Management?
i. D=cribe proposed sewage disposal and/or waste
water treatment facilities.
N
b. Amount of material to be excavated 45,000 from yds . 3
below water level nadcubic
sa? w/some clay
c. Type of material pan
d. Does the area to be excavated include marsh-
land, swamps, or other wetlands. 0
e. High ground excavation, in cub" 6 ya d 16 ,000
f. Dimensions of spoil disposal area Map each
g. Location of spoil disposal area
side of dike approX 8000 earl e,
h. Do you claim title to the disposal area? __Y.L, -
j. Have these facilities received stare or local
approval?
k. Describe existing treatment facilities.
t

Describe location and type of discharges to
1 j•
.
of the state (for example;, surface runoff, k.
waters
sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial
1
effluent, or "wash down"). .
in.
n.
m. Water supply source °•
n. If the project is oceanfront development,
describe-the steps that will be taken to main- p
tain established public beach accessways or pro- q•
vide new access.
o. If the project is on the oceanfront, what will
be the elevation above mean sea level of the
first habitable floor?
6 EXCAVATION AND FILL
INFORMATION
a. Describe below the purpose of proposed excava-
tion or fill activities (excluding bulkheads,
which are covered in Section 7).
Length Width Depth
Access channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
Boat basin
Other (break-
water, pier,
boat ramp,
rock jetty)
Fill placed in
wetland or below
MHW 8 , 000' 52'
Upland fill
areas I il
If not, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance?/ Yes
If so, where? See map next to excavation
Does the disposal area include eSny marshland,
swampland.'or water areas.
Will the fill material be placed below mean
high water? No
Amount of fill in cubic yards 45,000 yds
Type of fill material native soil ie sand/cla?ix
Source of fill material site
Will fill material be placed on marsh or other
wetlands? Yes 92'x8000'
Dimensions of the wetland to be filled
How will excavated or fill material be kept on
site and erosion controlled?A 3:1 backslope
will be maintained by native vegitation
or appropriate wildlife seed mixture.
r. What type of construction equipment will be
used (for example, dragline, backhoe, or
hydraulic dredge)? Dragline and backhoe
s. Will wetlands- be crossed in transporting equip-
ment to the project site? 140 If yes, explain
the steps that will be taken to lessen en-
vironmental impacts. Existing roads
will be used. Dragline will be used
within a 0 area o construction.
. 7 SHORELINE STABILIZATION
a. Length of bulkhead or riprap
b. Average distance waterward of mean high water
or normal water level
c. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months,
in feet
d. Type of bulkhead material
e. Amount of fill, in cubic yards, to be placed
below. mean high water
f. Type of fill .material
2
Air
" 8 ;'ADDITIONA.L'INFORMATION::''
In additior Ito the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted.:
A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument" under which the applicant claims
title to the affected property. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then for-
ward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permis-
sion from the owner to carry out the project.
A list of previous state or federal permits issued
for work on the project tract. Include permit
.numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
A check for $100 made payable to the Depart-
ment of Natural Resources and Community
Development to cover the costs of processing the
application.
A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in ocean-
front and inlet areas.
An accurate work plat (including plan view and A statement on the use of public funds. If the
t involves the expenditure of public funds, st-
cross sectional drawings; drawn to scale in black
k on 8 Yz x 11 white paper. (Refer to Coastal
i projec
tach a statement documenting compliance with the
n
Resources Commission Rule 7).0203 for a detailed North Carolina Environmental Policy Act
description.) (N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to 10).
Please note that original drawings are preferred and '.,9, CERTIFICATION AND FERMIS .,
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line ;..; ,;;?
: SION TO ENTER ON'.LAND. '
lats are acceptable only if 16
er
l
h
p
arg
er
prints or ot
high quality copies are provided by the applicant.
(Contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regard-
Any permit issued in response to this application
ing that agency's use of larger drawings.) A site or
location map is a part of plat requirements and it will allow only the development described in the
application. The project will be subject to condi-
must be sufficiently detailed to guide agency per- tions and restrictions contained in the permit.
sonnel unfamiliar with the area to the site. Include
county road (SR) numbers, landmarks, and the like.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the pro-
posed activity complies with the State of North
A stormwater management plan, if applicable, that
may have been developed in consultation with the Carolina's approved Coastal Management Program
and will be conducted in a manner consistent with
Division of Environmental Management. such program.

A list of the names and complete addresses of the I further certify that I am authorized to grant, and
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners. These do in fact, grant permission to representatives of
individuals have 30 days in which to submit com- state and federal review agencies to enter on the
ments on the proposed project to the Division of aforementioned lands in connection with
Coastal Management. The applicant must advise evaluating information related to this permit ap-
the adjacent landowners of this opportunity by sen-
a copy of the permit application to them by
din plication and follow-up monitoring of project.
g
registered or certified mail. This notification is re- This is the day of
quired by G.S. 113-229(d). 191 1
1Z
Name
Address X/a-
Landowner or Authorized agent
Name Send.the completed application materials to the
Address Division of Coastal Management Office nearest you
and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. See the
Name map on _the inside front cover for the appropriate
Address DCM office and addresses and phone number.
3
f

R
i
a
•r-
V
O
O
1 p„

E -
En
W H
W z
o w
w
A
a z
z 0
11 w ? rn
??"°'
zap
0-
2
w
H P; W
O,?/ H O
H
W
U U 3 W
S UEEr i oc

SE{e:E7" Z of S
77
?. "'mo''`w J?• _ - - -~...'_-.'- - _ - _ - --OI
-dt
Proposed
Ditch
Construction-4
i
n n
938
_ T?+-dt
\ ?r \\ Uy ,,-----------?4 ?= - -
40
I \
',.
CROATAN NATIONAL FOREST
CATFISH LAKE -
WATERFOWL IMPOUNDMENT
PROJECT 1991
i
Cn
w
z
x
w
Q
a

cJ

11 ?
a?
0
U
N
Lli

111
1 Y
._ ? H
J
O W H

F- O W

:
FW
z
z
..a ?
Cf)
z ? H O?
w z a -?
E-4 H PI W
H H 44 W
z
7) O H H''
O U U

e. 3 p-4
G

v

?J
X
M W
a
ca
L v?
~ N
W
M
tl
40
' O.
M

d

z
O
a
U
LL. X
O W
a
aw
ul
cl: 0
a a.
0
0-1
CL -?
ro N
s'AEE r S oF= S
r

USDA FOREST SERVICE
ENVIRONMENTAL. ASSESSMENT
CATFISH LAKE WATERFOWL IMPOUNDMENT
HABITAT PROJECT
Croatan National Forest
National Forests in North Carolina
For further information, contact
Paul Bullard, District Ranger
USDA - Forest Service
New Bern, North Carolina 28560
(919.) 638-5628
i

CATFISH LAKE WATERFOWL IMPOUNDMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
I'. PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION
The U.S. Forest Service is considering alternatives for management of
approximately 2226 acres of National Forest System lands which
comprise the original area of Catfish Lake Waterfowl Impoundment
(Impoundment) for the purpose of achieving the conditions, outputs,
and effects identified in the Croatan and Uwharrie National Forests
Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan). The Impoundment lays
in southeastern Jones County, North Carolina, approximately 12 miles
southwest of New Bern, North Carolina (see Vicinity Map, Appendix A).
14 miles of roads occur within the area, most of which are closed to
vehicular travel to protect wildlife and soil resources. Refer to
Compartment Resource Inventories for a complete description of
resources.
The Impoundment was mandated to serve as a public recreation area by
Congress, when funds were allocated for its acquisition. The area has
been cooperatively managed by the Croatan National Forest (CNF) and
the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) throughout
its history as public lands. Investments in management of the
Impoundment have been high by both agencies. The public also has a
high level of commitment to the Impoundment for wildlife viewing and
quality still hunting of waterfowl, white-tailed deer, bobwhite quail,
and black 'Dear. z.
The Impoundment was created in the middle 1970's after Forest Service
acquisition of the old Catfish Lake Farm. The farm had been
extensively and intensively ditched and drained for the purpose of
farming row crops in the organic soils. Subsequent improvement of the
area for waterfowl management resulted in a portion of the original
farm area being impounded utilizing the existing canals. The area
consists of 335 acres of pine plantation managed for upland game, 671
acres of low pocosin that is ditched, 400 acres of sand-ridge and
pocosin, and 820 acres of annually flooded waterfowl impoundment. The
upper (eastern) portion of the Impoundment•is about 480 acres. This
portion is periodically drained and farmed for various crops of milo,
millet, corn, and buckwheat left in place for waterfowl food. Liming
and fertilization associated with farming operations is also
accomplished, as well as prescribed burning. The lower (western)
portion of the Impoundment is approximately 400 acreas and is managed
by maintaining relatively constant water levels. This results in an
extensive stand"of a perennial Carex which is a fair-to-good
waterfowl food. A third sub-impoundment was recently developed in an
2

attempt to better manage water and vegetation. The impoundment
presently serves as an alternate use area for waterfowl during the
southern migration along the Atlantic flyway. Birds which are
intensively hunted on other areas often utilize the Impoundment as a
resting area due to its lesser hunting pressure.
The Impoundment is designated Management Area 9 in the Forest Plan.
This management area provides opportunities for the public to view and
hunt waterfowl. General direction is to feature waterfowl and enhance
opportunities to manage waterfowl and fisheries through habitat
improvements.
New social and political emphasis has been placed on waterfowl
management with the "Taking Wing' initiative. This initiative
provides for national forests to develop working partnerships for
waterfowl conservation with State agencies and public interest
groups. Both the NCWRC and Ducks Unlimited (DU) have recently
expressed strong interest in a formal partnership with the Croatan
National Forest to improve the Impoundment. Objectives are to
increase the effectiveness of the Impoundment as a 'layover' area with
high quality nutritional resources for the northen migration to
breeding grounds.
Project level management indicator species (MIS) for the environmental
assessment are waterfowl, white-tailed deer, black bear, bobwhite
quail,ourning dove, American alligator (Alligator
missiissippiensis), river otter, redfin pickerel, bullhead catfish,
and bald eagle (Haliaeetus leococephalis). Proposed, threatened,
endangered, and sensitive species (PETS) include the American
alligator and the bald eagle. No known federally-listed plants occur
within the proposed project area.
II. DESIRED FUTURE CONDITION
In accordance with the Forest-wide goals, Executive Order
11990, management area general direction and standards in
the Forest Plan, the following are desired future conditions
for the Impoundment area:
1. Provide the quality of habitat that is unique to Federal
lands.
2. Plant and animal diversity will be maintained, viable
populations of all native plants and animals will be
.
maintained or increased.
3. Threatened, endangered, and sensitive [PETS] plant and
animal species ...will be protected and population recovery
goals will be reached to the extent practicable...
4. Water quality and soil productivity will be maintained...
3.
5. Riparian areas, floodplains, wetlands, and existing
ecosystems will be perpetuated...
6. Protect the unique natural pocosin environment of the
Croatan National Forest...
7. Cultural resources will be protected...
8. Provide access for water oriented activities such
as ... waterfowl hunting.
9. Feature waterfowl; enhance opportunities to manage waterfowl
and fisheries through habitat improvements.
Issues relevant to this action were identified through input of
affected or interested publics and cooperating agencies, and include
.the.following:
1. Use of mechanical equipment in previously managed wetlands
to deepen and.widen one interior canal, changing the bottom
elevation of a water area.
2. Placement of "fill material" in wetlands which will replace
an aquatic area with dry land.
3. Effect on PETS species.
4# Continued closure of roads following improvement (access for
hunting and recreation).
5. Effectiveness of Impoundment in sustaining waterfowl
populations during migration periods.
6. Response to Taking Wing initiative and public interest in
the area.
III. ALTERNATIVES
A. Alternatives Considered, but Eliminated from Further Study
1. Laser leveling of Impoundment bottom elevations and central
and intermediate canal treatment was eliminated from further
study due to excessive cost and wetland impacts.
2. Expansion of farming treatments to areas outside the
traditionally treated Impoundment area was eliminated from
further study due to excessive cost and wetland impacts.
4

3. Managing any of the currently closed roads as open was
eliminated due to the sensitivity of wildlife and soil
resources. Open roads would increase disturbance and
decrease or eliminate habitat for American alligator, bald
eagle, black bear and waterfowl. Sensitive soils on the
available roads cannot withstand constant use or heavy
equipment without serious degradation. The Impoundment area
is noted for the quality still hunting afforded by closed
roads. These opportunities would be lost with open roads.
B. Alternaives Considered in Detail
Alternative 1 - No action; continue present management of the
Impoundment; do not improve water management.
U ernative 2 - Abandon Catfish Lake Waterfowl Impoundment; allow
area to progress ecologically to later succession pocosin
,vegetation. Manage existing roads as closed.
Alternative 3 - Improve water control for more effective
vegetation management and subsequent utilization by waterfowl as
layover area on northern migrations to breeding ground; deepen
and"widen central canal and provide nine water gates to subdivide
upper and lower portions of the Impoundment. Manage existing
roads as closed.
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES
Alternative 1
No action would maintain the existing conditions at Catfish Lake
Waterfowl Impoundment but would not meet the goals and general
direction specified in the Forest Plan or the wildlife and
fisheries standard for Management Area 9 which is to feature
waterfowl and enhance opportunities to manage waterfowl and
fisheries through habitat improvements. The Impoundment is
divided into three sub-impoundments. Water control is less than
effective due to the uneven bottom elevation, size of the area,
inability to build a head of water to efficiently flood higher
portions, and limited water gates. These conditions do not
provide the series of small impoundments which would mitigate the
effects of seasonal drawdowns and produce the 50:50 ratio of open
water and vegetative cover which is associated with high
diversity and numbers of waterfowl using semi-permanent marsh
habitat. Alternative 1 would,result in continued limited use of
the Impoundment by waterfowl and other project level MIS, but
would not respond to the Taking Wing initiative or improve the
effectiveness of the area in support of the waterfowl using the
Atlantic flyway. When the entire upper portion of the
Impoundment is drawndown at one time moist-soil associated plant
communities are difficult to maintain. River otter and American
alligator would be displaced throughout much of the year on a
5
recurring basis. Bald eagle, redfin pickerel, and bullhead
catfish habitat would decrease on a recurring basis. Black bear,
white-tailed deer, and bobwhite quail habitat would remain
unchanged. Invertebrate diversity and abundance would remain
about the same. Diversity within the Impoundment and across the
Croatan would remain essentially unchanged.
There would be no net loss of wetlands.
The most important fisheries consequence of alternative 1 would
be that there would be no annual drawdown of catfish lake and no
consequent fisheries habitat loss. Fish population size and
angling opportunities in the Waterfowl Impoundment will continue
to be a function of the permanently watered area in the deeper
end.
4
The current hydrologic regime of the site and surrounding area
would continue unchanged from present.
Soil productivity would be maintained at current levels. No
significant change in general conditions extant during the past
several years of management as a drawdown impoundment should
occur.
Alternative 1 would affect no known cultural resources. This
area is a low probability area for the likelihood of containing
cultural resources other than the Old Farm and associated
remnants (ditches, and past land use evidence). Naturally
fluctuating water levels and soil moisture may adversely affect
otherwise preserved archeological materials if they exist in the
area.;. Archeological surveys have been conducted along the
Catfish Lake Ro'ad.(Bens Branch Timber Sale 1986 & Catfish lake
Road`Improvement 1986). Three prehistoric sites were located
-about 4.5 miles south of the proposed project area in drier areas
bordering swampland.
Alternative 2
Alternative 2 would not meet the goals, general direction, or
standards specified.in the Forest Plan. The Congressionally
mandated intent for the area as a public, recreation resource
would not be met. Alternative 2 would result in a loss of the
majority of Impoundment acres as habitat for all the project
level MIS including the federally-listed American alligator and
bald eagle and the State-listed PETS plant species. This
alternative would decrease diversity within the project area and
across the Croatan National Forest. Previous investment by the
NCWRC and CNF would be lost.: Alternative 2 would not respond to
the Taking Wing initiative a.nd'opportunities to develop
conservation and management relationships with State agencies and
public interest groups would be foregone. Later stages of
pocosin vegetation would eventually develop which would provide
an increase in escape cover for"black bear. Some of the canals
within the Impoundment would'continue as open water areas, but
6

the desired 50:50 ratio of open water to vegetative cover for
effective waterfowl habitat would be lost. Waterfowl hunting and
viewing opportunities would be lost. Invertebrate diversity and
abundance would also likely decline with increased woody
vegetation and reduced plant diversity. Social and political
alliances with NCWRC and DU would be foregone. Alternative 2
would not meet the desired conditions, outputs, and effects
specified in the Forest Plan, and Executive Order 11990.
Disturbance would not increase since roads would remain closed.
Quality still hunting opportunities would continue.
Opportunities for wildlife observation would continue.
There would be no net loss of wetlands, but there would be net
loss of semi-permanent marsh wetland habitat.
Fish and fish food organisms in Catfish Lake will not be
influenced by the abandonment of the Waterfowl Impoundment. Fish
populations in the Waterfowl Impoundment will probably be reduced
.in proportion to available habitat converted to pocosin
vegetation.
The hydrologic regime will tend toward a more natural state
except'that the presence of the flow control gate, although open,
will cause continued ponding and detention of storm flows. Hence
the storm flows will have a longer duration than would be
expected from a drained condition. The peak discharge will be
somewhat lower than present, the presence of the discharge gate
should create a detention time similar to that of a vegetated
pocosin'. Total runoff should not significantly change with the
increased vegetation on the site. Catfish Lake no longer will be
affected-by drawdowns resulting from the flooding of the
impoundment. This will slightly increase the discharge from the
Lake into its natural outlet for the short time period the lake
level`would have been lowered.
Cessation of-management would eliminate soil disturbance, and
natural processes would dominate. In the short term, changes in
pH levels and nutrient status would result in a lowering of site
productivity for waterfowl food species that are important under
current management. With the reversion of.the site to
(subclimax) low pocosin, net accumulation of organic matter and,
oven a very long period, thickening of the organic horizons could
occur.
Alternative 2 would effect no known cultural resources like
Alternative 1.
Alternative 3
Alternative 3 would continue to provide an alternative use area
for waterfowl during southerly migrations and would meet the need
for high quality nutritional layover areas during the northern
migrations to the breeding ground. Alternative 3 would meet the
7

issues, general direction, and standards in the Forest Plan, as
well as the objectives and management specifications for
waterfowl in the USDA Forest Service Wildlife and Fisheries
Habitat Handbook. Habitat for all project level MIS, including
federally-listed and State-listed PETS species would improve.
Invertebrate species diversity and abundance would improve with
more diverse and increased early successional plant production.
Habitat for white-tailed deer, bobwhite quail, and black bear
would improve with increased early successional plant diversity
and productivity. Habitat for American alligator, bald eagle,
and river otter would improve with increased high quality
-foraging habitat associated with smaller water management units
and partial seasonal drawdowns.
A series of independently controlled small impoundments to better
maintain provision of the 50:50 ratio of open water and
vegetative cover would maximize the species diversity and numbers
of waterfowl. Better water control would provide for partial
`,drawdown of the Impoundment with more precise water levels which
result in optimum vegetative management for both moist-soil
native plant management which is the most productive and energy
efficient condition for waterfowl. Drawdowns of smaller portions
of the Impoundment would mitigate the recurring displacement of
species such as American alligator, bald eagle, river otter,
redfin pickerel, and bullhead catfish, and would provide
increased suitable habitat on a continuing basis. Diversity
within the Impoundment and across the Croatan would increase.
Liming and fertilization of the sub-impoundments would continue
to serve as a high quality direct habitat improvement for all
project level MIS.
Disturbance would not increase since roads would remain closed.
Quality still hunting opportunities would continue and improve
with increased wildlife'productivity and diversity.
Opportunities for wildlife observation would increase for these
same reasons.
There would be a small net loss of wetlands as a result of the
dry land created by the deepening and widening of the central
canal and creation of parallel berms, but overall the wetlands
would be enhanced as suggested by Executive Order 11990 and FSM.
This alternative will result in some short term loss of preferred
fisheries habitat in Catfish Lake during the annual drawdown.
There will probably be no measurable fish population changes in
Catfish Lake, but shoreline angling opportunities may be reduced
during this annual period. Fish population size and angling
opportunities in the Waterfowl Impoundment will be the same as
under current operating conditions.
The hydrologic regime will remain essentually the same as
present. Stormflow discharges will be somewhat lower than
present as the precipitation should be more effectively detained
8

(slowed) by the series of gated outlets rather than the single
gate outlet. Due to the low hydraulic conductivities of the
#. * soil, little or no effects due to ponding water in the eastern
portions of the impoundment should be observed. The effects on
Catfish Lake will be essentially the same or slightly less than
at present. Less water may be required for impoundment flooding
hence less drawdown due to the better control of flooding depths
within the impoundment cells.
Mitigation to offset the effects of the very limited amount of
dry land created by the cross dikes in the present impoundment
area could be achieved, if required, by plugging some of the
existing ditches in the area immediately west of the
impoundment. Plugging these ditches would raise the water table
especially in the immediate vicinity of the ditch. The water
table should remain somewhat higher longer into the growing
season which should cause a gradual shift in vegetation to those
species which tolerate wetter conditions throughout the growing
`season. With the ditches plugged, the hydrologic regimen should
more nearly approach that of the undrained pocosin. Overall the
'ecosystem should eventually return to the natural pre-drained
wetland with its inherent values. A potential negative effect of
plugging the ditches may be that the adjacent road bed may become
somewhat softer and wetter, hence requiring more frequent
:maintenance.
Soil productivity for the diversity of desired species (waterfowl
food plants) would be maintained or, with more precise control of
sub-impoundments, improved in comparison with current levels.
Deepening and widening of central canal and construction of berms
would result in the direct displacement and redistribution of
soils and substrata materials. Otherwise, no significant change
in general conditions extant during the past several years of
management as:.,a drawdown impoundment should occur.
Alternative 3 may facilitate the discovery of otherwise unknown
cultural resources during ditch construction. This would
adversely affect otherwise preserved sites, but would not be
mitigated by data recovery and preservation. Monitoring during
construction would be necessary. As in the other alternatives,
changing water levels and soil moisture may affect otherwise
preserved sites. Alternative 3 has the most likelihood of doing
this because of the planned 50/50 ratio of wetlands/drylands.
V. ASSESSMENT OF CUMULATIVE EFFECTS
This document discusses alternatives for management of 2,226 acres of
National Forest System land and the environmental consequences of the
alternatives. All connected actions are identified in the
alternatives, with the exception of periodic maintenance which is
required for waterfowl management and on roads withing the area.
These are all of the management activities contemplated for the area
during the reasonably forseeable future. Similar sets of actions have
9

been successfully conducted on other public lands, including federal
and state wildlife refuges, without significant impacts to the
rt environment. No significant impacts or irreversible or irretrievable
effects are expected to result from the proposed actions.
It is anticipated that similar actions will not be needed in the
future. If maintanence of canals for effective water management is
needed, such work would be confined to existing canals. The purpose
and need for this work would be to maintain the desired future
conditions specified in this or subsequent Forest Plans, the Taking
'' 'Wing initiative, and public input.
VI. AGENCIES AND PERSONS CONSULTED
.A. Public Meeting
The impoundment was discussed at length during meetings with
numerous hunting clubs that use the national forest.
B., Additional Input was Received from:
Mohschiein, Tom
Wildlife Management Biologist
Division of Wildlife Management
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Bitely, Ralph
Marsh Coordinator, Atlantic Flyway
Ducks Unlimited Inc..
Thomas, Steve
Regional Director
Ducks Unlimited Inc.
Pele j., Lee
Life Scientist
Environmental Protection Agency
Nelson, Kent
District Fisheries Biologist
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Jahnke, Ernest W.
Biologist
US Army Corps of Engineers
Finwood, Jim
Habitat Relationships Coordinator
US Forest. Service, Southern Region
Huges, Tommy
Management Biologist
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Gillis, Earl
Supervising Wildlife Biologist
10
i
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Olmstead, Allen
Tech. Supervisor
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Darden, Tom L.
Program Director
US Forest Service, Washington Office
:,-? ,Seehorn, Monte E.
Fisheries Biologist
US Forest Service, Region 8
?r
Millman, Lauren
Forest Biologist
National Forests of North Carolina
Hill, Donnelly
Forest Fisheries Biologist
National Forests of North Carolina
Manning, Dan
Forest Soil Scientist
National Forests of North Carolina
Snedeker, Rodney
Forest Archealogist
National Forests of North Carolina
Burns, Richard
`Forest Hydrologist
National Forests of North Carolina
Cole, Stephen
h Zone Engineering Technician
National Forests of North Carolina
Kaylor, Robert
Wildlife Technician
Croatan National Forest
Foster, Dennis
Civil Engineering Technician
Croatan National Forest
Bullard, Robert P.
District Ranger
Croatan National Forest
Brown,,James C.
Resources Assistant
Croatan National Forest
11

Jenkins, Dewey B.
04 Supv. Forestry Technician/Fire Control Officer
Croatan National Forest
LeBlond, Richard
Contract Botanist
Swansboro, NC
C. Taking Wing Initiative
VII... TECHNICAL LITERATURE
USDA Forest Service Wildlife and Fisheries Habitat
"Management Handbook. pp.
USDA Forest Service. Croatan and Uwharrie Land and Resource
Management Plan. PP.
Crockett, George.
District Waterfowl Management Plan. USDA Forest Service,
Croatan National Forest. 1982. 19 pp.
Cross, Diana H.
Waterfowl Management Handbook. USDI Fish and Wildlife
Service Fish and Wildlife Leaflet 13. 1988.
Fredrickson, Leigh H:
Management.of seasonally flooded impoundments for wildlife.
USDI Fish and Wildlife Publication 148. 1982. 29 pp.
12
' ', * . • DECISION NOTICE
AND
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
USDA-FOREST SERVICE R-8
CROATAN NATIONAL FOREST
CROATAN RANGER DISTRICT
Craven and Carteret Counties, NC
Catfish Lake Waterfowl Impoundment Project. An environmental assessment
(EA) discussing the potential impacts of constructing lake waterfowl
impoundment. available for public review in the Ditrict Ranger's Office in New
Bern, NC, The FA identifies the purpose and need for the project, issues,
Forest Plan authority, alternatives, affected environment, environmental
consequences, mitigating measures, and public involvement.
The purpose of the project is to improve the management of the waterfowl
impoundment im r@sponse to public demand, the forest plan, and the forest
service nation4d initiative,"taking wing".
The 2226 acres of National Forest System lands which comprise the original area
of Catfish Lake Waterfowl Impoundment is identified in the Croatan and Uwharrie
National Forests Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan). The
Impoundment lies in southeastern Jones County, North Carolina, approximately 12
miles southwest of New Bern, North Carolina (see Vicinity Map) 14 miles of
road;-occur within the area, most of which are closed to vehicular travel to
protect wildlife and soil resources.
Based on the analysis and evaluation described in the EA. It is my
decision to adopt Alternative 3- improve water control in the impoundment. The
action wrll be to-deepen and widen the central canal and provide 9 water gates
to sukd?e;upper and lower portions of the impoundment. This alternative is
judged'"'to='provide the best combination of values and benefits to meet the
Forest Plan direction, Forest procedures, and public demand for waterfowl
hunting opportunities.
Advice and public involvement include local wildlife and hunting clubs,
state anid federal officials involved or interested in the project. Everyone
contacd was in favor of the project. Concerns related to meeting the new
wetland laws.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. No action; contintfe present management of the Impoundment; do not improve
water management.
2. Laser leveling of Impoundment bottom elevations and central and
intermediate canal treatment was eliminated from further study due to
bxcessive cost and wetland impacts. ,
3. Expansion of farming treatments to areas outside the traditionally treated
Impoundment area was eliminated from further study due to excessive cost
and wetland impacts.,
.:.

I:
I
.4. Managing any of the currently closed roads as open was eliminated due to
the sensitivity of wildlife and soil resources. Open roads would increase
disturbance and decrease or eliminate habitat for American Alligator, bale
eagle, black bear and waterfowl. Sensitive soils on the available roads
4g canpot withstand constant use or heavy equipment without serious
degradation. The Impoundment area is noted for.the quality still hunting
afforded by closed is noted for the quality still hunting afforded by
closed roads. These opportunities would be lost with open roads.
5. Abandon Catfish Lake Waterfowl Impoundment; allow area to progress
ecologically to later succession pocosin vegetation. Manage existing roads
as closed.
6. Improve water control for more effective vegetation management and
subsequent utilization by waterfowl as layover area on northern migrations
to breeding ground; deepen and widen central canal and provide nine water
gates to subdivide upper and lower portions of the Impoundment. Manage
existing roads as closed.
Mitigation measures were designed in the scoping process. All regulatory
agencies were contacted and their concerns incorporated in the EA. The entire
project is contigent on obtaining a 404 permit to proceed. The permit may
require further mitigation which has been planned.
Monitoring for sensitive plants and archelogical artifacts will be done
thro,6ih out the construction phase.
Based on the evironmental Assessment, I have determined that this action is
not a major federal action, individually or cumulatively,and will not
significantly affect the quality of the human environment. Therefore, an
environmental impact statement is not needed. This determination is based on
the following factors:
1. There will be no significant effects on the quality of the human
environment as a result of these actions.
2. Public health and safety will be minimally affected by he proposed
actions .
3. Wetlands protection measures as spelled out in the. 404 permit will be
adhrred to
4. Based'on public review og the EA, the effects on the quality of human
environment descr-*ed in the EA are not likely to be highly controversial.
5. There will be no effects on the human environment that are highly uncertain
or involve unique or unknown risks.
6. These actions do not set a precedent for other projects that may be
implemented to meet the goals and objectives of the Forest Plan.
7. There will be no significant cumulative effects between this project and
other projects implemented or planned on areas. separated from the affected

x Jtre f this project beyond those evaluated in Chapter IV of the FEIS for
he .Forest Plan.
8, iio cultural resources will be affected.
9. mpacts to endangered, threatened or sensitive species will be mitigated so
hat they will not be.significant.
10. The actions do not threaten a violation of Federal, State or local law or
requirements imposed for the protection of the environment.
This decision may be implemented no sooner than 30 days, beginning the day
after the legal notice of this decision is published.
The-decision is subject to appeal pursuant to 36 CFR 217. Any written
notice of appeal of this decision must be fully consistent with 36 CFR 217.9,
"Content of Notice of Appeaa," including the reasons for appeal and must be
filed with: Forest Supe•viso r - U.S. Forest Service, National Forests in North
Carolina, PO Box 2750, Asheville NC 28802, no later than 45 days, beginning the
day after the legal notice of this decision if published. Simultaneously send
a copy of the notice of appeal to my office: U.S. Forest Service, Croatan
Ranger District, 141 E. Fisher Ave., New Bern NC 28560.
For additional information concerning this decision or the Forest Service
appeal process, contact Warren Starnes [phone].
District Ranger
dyj 13,
Date 1 .1
s

BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION
FOR
CROATAN NATIONAL FOREST
CATFISH LAKE WATERFOWL
IMPOUNDMENT PROJECT
JUNE 1991
BY
W. STARNES
WILDLIFE BIOLOGIST
?r
The Croatan National Forest plans to build a ditch and two dikes to
subdivide the Catfish Waterfowl Impoundment. The project is located in Eastern
Jones County, North Carolina. No habitat for any proposed, endangered,
th eatened, and sensitive species (PETS) were found within the boundries of the
ditching project. The Federally listed American Alligator, and Bald Eagle,
have been sited in the area. No Federally proposed or listed species were
found in the area during the surveys. Based upon this biological evaluation,
the project is not likely to adversely affect any Federally proposed and listed
species and is not likely to adverselly affect sensitive species.
Proposed, endangered, threatened, and sensitive species considered for this
biological evaluation are included on the National Forests in North Carolina
PETS Species List. The National Forests in North Carolina are currently
updating - ETS Animal Species List. Until that list is revised, all State
listed threate4ed, endangered, and special concern animal species are
considered in the biological evaluation process.
PLANTS
a
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program was contacted to determine
which PETS plant species are known to occur in the project area. Based on this
data base check on February 1991, there is no record of any PETS plant species
occurring lithin the project area.
An analysis of potential PETS plant species habitat of the project area was
completed by Richard LeBlond, Consulting Botanist on April 11, 1991. No PETS
species were found.
ANIMALS
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission was contacted to initially
determine which PETS animal and aquatic species occur or may occur in the
project area. Based upon knowledge of habitat relationships and current PETS
animal species-.elsi4ent occurrence records for. the project are, it was concluded
that the 2 PETS animal species could occur in the project area.
1. American Alligator Federal-Threatened
2. Bald Eagle Federal-Endangered
Several surveys of the area were conducted by Wildlife Technician Robert
Kaylor and Wildlife Biologist Warren Starnes during 1990 & 1991. No PETS were
found on the project site, but both Alligator and Bald Eagle have been sited.
using the Impoundment.Area. It could not be determined if the alligator used
the existing ditch where construction would occur.
POTENTIAL EFFECTS
The construction area has forageing potential for Bald Eagle and
Alligator. The project will disrupt any use of the site, an area of 91' X
8000'. Construction will last up to 3 months, during the spring and winter of
191- 92. No Alligator nest sites have been found.' The following coordination
measures are available to-mitigate this potential impact:

.,.
;;
1 ,•. '
r
\Equipment operators will be instructed in identifying PETS species and
habitat.
2. Site inspection by Biologist will occur daily.
3 Any,,, questionable habitat will be avoided and intensely surveyed.
4. All back slopes will be reseeded with natural vegetation.
DETERMINATION OF EFFECTS
Based on the coordination measures that will be implemented as part of the
project, it is my determination that the project as proposed is "Not likely to
adversely affect" the American Alligator or the Bald Eagle.
Completed by:
ARREN ARNES DATE
Wildlife Biologist
Croatan any Uwharrie National Forest

L .1
- Z
- - Z
i i
z
l
f
A
s
?.k

$ 9

a?
PhoL ???k?:1 Oy!;i)
» ?F3?
e
l ? f AC
F
f S
J FYh
4

Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Action ID No. 199103076
PUBLIC NOTICE
cam;; .\Cj •,?!?i ??•? O
ICA
August 29, 1991
THE U.S. DEPARTMEN11?OF AGRICULTURE, FOREST SERVICE, CROATAN NATIONAL
FOREST, 141 East Fisher Avenue, New Bern, North Carolina 28560, has applied
for.-a Department of the Army. (DA) permit TO PLACE EXCAVATED MATERIAL IN
WETLANDS AXSULTING FROM DITCHING AND DIKE CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH SUB-
IMPOUNDMENTS WITHIN CATFISH LAKE WATERFOWL IMPOUNDMENT, Jones County, North
Carolina.
The following description of the work-is taken from information provided
by the applicant and from observations made during an onsite visit by a
representative of the Corps of?Engineers. Plans and other, data submitted with
the application show that the existing impoundment has been ditched for
drainage and has four flashboard-rizers and two bisecting dikes to form three,
255-acre sub-impoundments. One sub-impoundment is kept flooded and the other
two are.mbnacjed for moist soil plants. The proposed work involves excavation,
by dragline and backhoe, of a central control ditch along the alignment of an
existing'ditch, to bisect each field and form six sub-impoundments. The
existing ditch is to be deepened and widened. Approximately 45,000 cubic
yards of excavated material is to be place in a 92-foot-wide., 8,000-foot-long
area. Dikes are. to be constructed on each side of the c'ientral control ditch
to establish a "tank" effect and provide for efficient control of hydrology.
The "tank" can be filled to create head pressure and increase flow rates. The
central ditch is to access each field independently, and access points are to
be controlled by flashboard-rizers so that each field may be independently
flooded or drained. Nine water control devices are to 4e installed within.
dikes. Dikes are to be graded to a 3 to 1 slopes.and seeded with local
vegetation. The purpose of the work is to more effectively control water
elevations for impoundment management with minimal impact on surrounding
pocosins, Catfish Lake and natural hydrology. Plans showing the work are
included with this public notice.
The State of North Carolina will review this public notice to determine
the need for the applicant to obtain any required State authorization. No DA
permit will be issued until the coordinated Sbitte viewpoint on the proposal
has been received and reviewed by this ager%cy,•nor will a.DA permit be issued
until the North Carolina Division of Env,irtnme?ital Management (DEM) has
determined the applicability of a Water"6ualty Certificate as required by PL
92-500.
This application is being considered pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Any-person,may request,.,in-writing within the
comment period specified in the 'notice, that a public. hearing be held to
consider this application.` Requests for public hearing shall state, with
particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing.
.,r f tY'wc4
? .. r '?n.anw r
? WwvB
pState of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
225 North McDowell Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
James G. Martin, Governor Roger N. Schecter
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
September 10, 1991
MEMORANDUM
TO: Dr. George T. Everett, Director
Division of Envirormental.Management
FROM: John.R. Parker, Jr.
Inland "404" Coordinator
SUBJECT: "404" Project Review
The attached U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Public Notice for Action No. 199103076
dated August 29, 1991 describing a project proposed by The U.S. Dept. of Agriculture
is being-circulated to interested state agencies for comments on applicable Section
404 and/or Section 10 permits.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project
and return this form by September 30, 1991. If you have any questions regarding the
proposed project, please contact me at 733-2293. When appropriate, in-depth
comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY This office supports the project proposal.
No comment.
Comments on this.project are attached.
This office objects to the project as proposed.
Signed
Date
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
k ,
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Action ID No. 199103076 August 29, 1991
PUBLIC NOTICE
THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOREST SERVICE, CROATAN NATIONAL
FOREST, 141 East Fisher Avenue, New Bern, North Carolina 28560, has applied
for a Department of the Army (DA) permit TO PLACE EXCAVATED MATERIAL IN
WETLANDS RESULTING FROM DITCHING AND DIKE CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH SUB-
IMPOUNDMENTS WITHIN CATFISH LAKE WATERFOWL IMPOUNDMENT, Jones County, North
Carolina.
The following description of the work is taken from information provided
by the applicant and from observations made during an onsite visit by a
representative of the`Corps of Engineers. Plans and other data submitted with
the application show that the existing impoundment has been ditched for
drainage and has four flashboard.-rzers and two bisecting dikes to form three,
255-acre sub-impoundments. One sub.:impoundment is kept flooded and the other
two are managed for moist soil plants. The proposed work involves excavation,
by dragline and backhoe, of a central control ditch along the alignment of an
existing ditch, to bisect each field..and,form six sub-impoundments. The
existing ditch is to be deepened and widened. Approximately 45,000 cubic
yards of excavated material is to be place in a 92-foot-wide, 8,000-foot-long
area. Dikes are to be constructed on:each side of the central control ditch
to establish a "tank" effect and provide for efficient control of hydrology.
The "tank" can be filled to create head pressure and increase flow rates. The
central ditch is-to access each field independently, and access points are to
be controlled by flashboard-rizers so that each field may be independently
flooded or drained. Nine water control devices are to be installed within
dikes. Dikes are to be graded to a 3 to 1 slopes and seeded with local
vegetation. The purpose of the work is to more effectively control water
elevations for.impoundment management with minimal impact on surrounding
pocosins, Catfish Lake and natural hydrology. Plans showing the work are
-included with this public notice.
The State of North Carolina will review this public notice to determine
the need for the applicant to obtain any required State authorization. No DA
permit will be issued until the coordinated State viewpoint on the proposal
has been received and reviewed by this agency, nor will a DA permit be issued
until the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (DEM.), has
determined the applicability of a Water Quality Certificate as required by PL
92-500.
This application is being considered pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Any person may request, in writing within the
comment period specified in the notice, that a public hearing be held to
consider this application. Requests for public hearing shall state, with
particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing.

-3-
proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on
endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental
effects and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments may be
used for preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the
National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are also used to determine the
need for a,public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the
proposed activity.
The applicant has prepared an Environmental Assessment, pursuant to the
National Environmental Policy Act. Further information regarding this
document may be obtained by contacting Mr. Paul Bullard, District Ranger, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, New Bern, North Carolina 28560,
telephone [phone].
Generally, the decision whether to issue this DA permit will not be made
until the DEM issues,.denies,.or waives State certification required by
Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The DEM considers whether or not the
proposed activity will comply with Sections 301, 302, 306, and 307 of the
Clean Water Act. The application and this public notice for the DA permit
serves as application to the DE?f for certification.
Additional information regarding the'Clean Water Act certification may be
reviewed at.the offices of the'Environmental operations Section, DEM,
Salisbury Street, Archdale Building,-Raleigh, North Carolina. Copies of such
materials will be furnished to any person requesting copies upon payment of
reproduction costs.
The DEM plans to take final action in the issuance of the Clean Water Act
certification on or after September 2.0, 1991.
All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application for Clean
Water Act certification should do so in writing delivered to the DEM, Post
Office Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687, on or before September
16, 1991, Attention: Mr. John Dorney.
Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will
be received in this office, Attention: Mr. Norm Sanders, until 4:15 p.m.,
September 30, 1991, or telephone [phone].

Eol
i
Q
v
d
O
H
rn
W H
x z
w
A
a z
? x
z o
oWa??
H C?
z 04
x
k
CL
Q
G
w
Y:
O H
1-4 124
W
W W 7.
a'd?Oa'
U U 3 W
suer' i o.4C 57
?;? ? ` Ai L:I tt',q {+)., rl? • - tt •.' ?_ Ir tI r ?:b•• ? ?r•?rt _?.? ' ' - < _ ..
-e.... •+: ,,. ?. -' -? ---777! + ... - .•.,•? -+ ;• ? ?-? .?•. ...:_ ± ? ?y?LI ?-'. _ _ •`_ _
?/r . -_?-/ .? / ~ ? fir- _ ?r?- _- - `w -_i. 'F?'• ? + ? .?- ? : + _.w ?~ ?+ ?+ ' _ _ -
Proposed
/ Ditch )/ _ w????.•'!'y< •'?• I w'??a +•'??.±'
Construction. - -_ " _
41
--
N
?f N
;'l? n pp
N;i N N
!1
y \
'1I 1 ' i i
u
N.
N.
a.:
N
N
i

CROATAN NATIONAL FOREST
CATFISH LAKE
WATERFOWL IMPOUNDMENT
PROJECT 1991
x»
Cn
rn
w
z
x
w
A
a

xja
4Z.
--------- - _= _ -"
i
11
d
0
U
N
LLJ
y

W
Y
? E
J
o - ?
a z
z w
A
z

U) 0

V
a

pp.,?

Z ^'
?
? ?txW U
E H C4 W
Z W W
Q Go4U?P4
d. UU3f3a
G
c '? v
V

j.j W
0
Q
W.
c?
z
z
H ?
I U) N
ao x

w
M
w
iD
s#EE-r S o." S
Q?
N
h
?"?
n ? ? ? ??"" ? ? -