Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19910073 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19910202A SfA State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources Division of Environmental Management 512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 James G. Martin, Governor George T Everett, Ph.D. William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director December 10, 1991 Regional Offices Asheville 704/251-6208 Mr. Burgess G. Patton Fayetteville 4375 Hidden Court 919/486-1541 College Park, North Carolina 30349 Mooresville 704/663-1699 Dear Mr. Patton: Raleigh Subject: Certification Pursuant to Section 401 of the Federal 9191733-2314 Clean Water Act, Washington Proposed excavation of an access channel. and filling of 919/946-6481 an abandoned mine hole Wilmington Project # 91786, COE# 199200176 919/395-3900 Clay County Winston-Salem 919/896-7007 Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No. 2652 issued to Burgess Patton dated December 10, 1991. If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, -,eo-ge T. Everett Attachments cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers Corps of Engineers Asheville Regional Office Asheville DEM Regional Office Mr. John Dorney Mr. John Parker Central Files P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 276264)535 Idephone 919-733-7015 / Pollution Prevention Pays An L IM] Oplx MUnity Altinnin- Action L.mplowr ° NORTH CAROLINA Clay County CERTIFICATION THIS CERTIFICATION is issued of Section 401 Public Laws 92-500 and subject to the North Carolina Management Regulations in 15 NCAC Patton pursuant to an application 1991 to excavate an access channe an abandoned mine hole. in conformity with the requirements and 95-217 of the United States Division of Environmental 2H, Section .0500 to Burgess filed on the 4 day of November L to an existing dock and fill The Application provides adequate assurance that the discharge of fill material into the waters of Chatague Lake in conjunction with the proposed channel and mine hole fill in Clay County will not result in a violation of applicable Water Quality Standards and discharge guidelines. Therefore, the State of North Carolina certifies that this activity will not violate Sections 301, 302, 303, 306, 307 of PL 92-500 and PL 95-217 if conducted in accordance with the application and conditions hereinafter set forth. Condition(s) of Certification: 1. That the activity be conducted in such a manner as to prevent significant increase in turbidity outside the area of construction or construction related discharge (increases such that the turbidity in the Stream is 25 NTU's or less are not considered significant). 2. Fill areas shall be stabilized as soon as possible after construction to reduce turbidity problems. Violations of any condition herein set forth shall result in revocation of this Certification. This Certification shall become null and void unless the above conditions are made conditions of the Federal Permit. This the 10 day of December, 1991. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ?or a T. Everett, Direc or WQC# 2652 'J This office objects to the project as proposed. State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources Division of Coastal Management 225 North McDowell Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 James G. Martin, Governor Roger N. Schecter William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director November 4, 1991 MEMORANDUM TO: Dr. George T. Everett, Director Division of Environmental Management FROM: John R. Parker, Jr. Inland "404" Coordinator SUBJECT: "404" Project Review The attached U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Public Notice for Action No. 199200176 dated October 31, 1991 describing a project proposed by Mu[rge_ss G. Patton is being circulated to interested state agencies for comments on applicable Section 404 and/or Section 10 permits. Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form by November 29, 1991. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact me at 733-2293. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data is requested. REPLY This office steps the project proposal.( No comment. Comments on this project are attached. Signed STA7t o Date P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone 919-733-2293 A., F-ul C),_-;- AKi-tive Artinn Fmnlnvrr J# ??tW'sr/uF 4(n1 ? D Quua `? State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources Asheville Regional Office James G. Martin, Governor William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY SECTION December 4, 1991 MEMORANDUM TO: John Dorney ?Q /'? THROUGH: Forrest R. Westal? Regional Water Quality Supervisor FROM: Kerry S. Becker x$-,;& Environmental Technician SUBJECT: Action I.D. 199200176 Burgess G. Patton Clay County s Ann B. Orr Regional Manager The site located on Lake Chatuge proposed for dredging and filling as requested by Mr. Burgess S. Patton was inspected on December 3, 1992. The slope of the grounds is approximately 25% until about 20 yards from the water's edge. At this point the ground becomes nearly flat and is nearly level with the lake's current water level. This portion of the shore becomes inundated with lake water when the lake is full resulting in a shallow water cove. No wetlands are involved with this project. Issuance of water quality certification for this project is recommended conditional upon the installation of silt fences and other erosion control measures prior to excavation in the channel and stabilization of the filled areas as soon as possible with vegetation and/or hay or wood mulch until permanent ground cover can develop to prevent exceeding the stream standard of 25 NTU. If there are any further questions, please give me a call. Interchange Building, 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, N.C. 28801 • Telephone 704251-6208 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer (oft. •. ° --. r N Za ? r 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1 , 91C-74131 Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Direct C-D C? e MEMORANDUM P TO: John R. Parker, 404 Coordinator Division of Coastal Management 1919 -9 FROM: Dennis Stewart, Manager Habitat Conservation Section Az6w? DATE: November 18, 1991 P SUBJECT: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Public Notice No. 0176. Request for a permit by Mr. Burgess G. Patton to discharge fill material into Chatuge Reservoir opposite Hiwassee River Mile 121.OR, in conjunction with excavation of an access channel to his existing docking facilities and the filling of an abandoned mine hole below full pool elevation near Hayesville, Clay County. The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) has reviewed the information provided by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and biological field staff conducted a site visit on November 6, 1991. These comments are-provided in accordance with provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (33 U.S.C. 466 et seq.), and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d.). The applicant is requesting a permit to excavate 400 cubic yards of material from a 100-foot long by 54-foot wide access channel. The channel is to have a 30-foot bottom width with 3:1 sideslopes. Excavation will be accomplished by bulldozer when lake levels are drawn down (in the dry). In addition, 40 cubic-- yards of the excavated material will be deposited within an irregular shaped abandoned mine hole to eliminate a health and safety problem. The remainder of the excavated material will be disposed of above the full pool elevation of Chatuge Reservoir. Chatuge Reservoir (HIW 1-45) is an impoundment of the Hiwassee River and provides fishing for bass, sunfish, and crappie. At the time of the site visit, the reservoir level was low and water did not reach to Mr. Patton's dock. Substrate in this area consists mostly of heavy clay and silt. The abandoned - mine hole was also exposed by the low water level in the reservoir. Carolina Wildlife Resources Memo Page 2 November 18, 1991 vw*w ++0 The proposed project should have minimal impact on the fisheries resources of Chatuge Reservoir, provided work is performed in the dry and adequate erosion and sedimentation measures are installed and maintained throughout the life of the project. The NCWRC does not object to the issuance of the permit, provided the following recommendations are followed by the applicant to minimize sedimentation` into the reservoir and to stabilize the project site while reservoir levels are low: 1) Stringent erosion control measures should be implemented where soil is disturbed and maintained until project completion. 2) Temporary ground cover should be placed on bare surfaces, including spoil piles, as soon as construction is complete. Permanent vegetation in these same areas must be established within 15 days of project completion to provide long term erosion control. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If we can be of further assistance, please advise. DLS/lp cc: Ms. Stephanie Goudreau, Mt. Region Habitat Biologist Mr. Micky Clemmons, District 9 Fisheries Biologist Mr. Joffrey Brooks, District 9 Wildlife Biologist Mr. Allen Ratzlaff, USFWS, Asheville 4r. John Dorney, DEM ? ?. SrArf 4, State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources Division of Coastal Management 225 North McDowell Street 0 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 James G. Martin, Governor William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary November 4, 1991 Noll 199 MEMORANDUM t` R it 1 ; TO: Dr. George T. Everett, Director Division of Environmental Management FROM: John R. Parker, Jr. - Inland "404" Coordinator SUBJECT: "404" Project Review Roger N. Schecter Director The attached U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Public Notice for Action No. 199200176 dated October 31, 1991 describing a project proposed by Burgess G. Patton is being circulated to interested state agencies for comments on applicable Section 404 and/or Section 10 permits. Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form by November 29, 1991. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact me at 733-2293. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data is requested. REPLY This office supports the project proposal. No comment. Comments on this project are attached. This office objects to the project as proposed. Signed Date P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone 919-733-2293 An EOual Oooortunity Affirmative Action Employer DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers Post Office Box 1890 Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890 Action ID. 199200176 October 31, 1991 PUBLIC NOTICE BURGESS G. PATTON, 4375 HIDDEN COURT, COLLEGE PARK, GEORGIA 30349 has applied for a Department of the Army (DA) permit TO DISCHARGE FILL MATERIAL INTO CHATUGE RESERVOIR, IN SHOOTING CREEK OPPOSITE HIWASSEE RIVER MILE 121.OR, IN CONJUNCTION WITH EXCAVATION OF AN ACCESS CHANNEL TO HIS EXISTING DOCKING FACILITIES AND THE FILLING OF AN ABANDONED MINE HOLE BELOW FULL POOL ELEVATION NEAR Hayesville, Clay County, North Carolina. The following description of the work is taken from data provided by the applicant and from observations made during an onsite visit by representatives of...the.Corps of Engineers. Plans submitted with the application show the excavation of approximately 400 cubic yards of material from a 100-foot-long by 54-foot-wide access channel. The channel is to have a 30-foot-bottom width with 3:1 sideslopes. Excavation is to be accomplished by bulldozer when lake levels are drawn down (in the dry). In addition, approximately 40 cubic yards of the excavated material will be deposited within an irregular shaped abandoned minehole to eliminate a health and safety problem. The remainder of the excavated material will be disposed of above the full pool elevation of Chatuge Reservoir. The access channel is to be deepened to allow swimming and boating access during drawdown periods. Plans showing the work are included with this public notice. The State of North Carolina will review this public notice to determine the need for the applicant to obtain any required State authorization. No DA permit will be issued until the coordinated State viewpoint on the proposal has been received and reviewed by this agency, nor will a DA permit be issued until the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (DEM) has determined the applicability of a Water Quality Certificate as required by PL 92-500. This application is being considered pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Any person may request, in writing within the comment period specified in the notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearing shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. The District Engineer has consulted the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places for the presence or absence of registered properties, or properties listed as being eligible for inclusion therein, and this worksite is not registered property or property listed as being eligible for inclusion in the Register. Consultation of the National Register constitutes the extent of cultural resource investigations by the District -2- Engineer, and he is otherwise unaware of the presence of such resources. Presently, unknown archeological, scientific, prehistorical, or historical data may be lost or destroyed by work under the requested permit. The District Engineer, based on available information, is not aware that the proposed activity will affect species, or their critical habitat, designated as endangered or threatened pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973. The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity and its intended use on the public interest. Evaluation of the probable impacts which the proposed activity may have on the public interest requires a careful weighing of all those factors which become relevant in each particular case. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The decision whether to authorize a proposal, and if so the conditions under which .it.will.be allowed to occur, are therefore determined by the outcome of the general balancing process. That decision should reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal must be considered including the cumulative effects thereof. Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards and flood plain values (in accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use, navigation, shore erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving the placement of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, a permit will be denied if the discharge that would be authorized by such permit would not comply with the Environmental Protection Agencies, 404(b)(1) guidelines. Subject to the preceding sentence and any other applicable guidelines or criteria, a permit will be granted unless the District Engineer determines that it would be contrary to the public interest. The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition, or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity. I < • -2- Engineer, and he is otherwise unaware of the presence of such resources. Presently, unknown archeological, scientific, prehistorical, or historical data may be lost or destroyed by work under the requested permit. The District Engineer, based on available information, is not aware that the proposed activity will affect species, or their critical habitat, designated as endangered'or threatened pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973. The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity and its intended use on the public interest. Evaluation of the probable impacts which the proposed activity may have on the public interest requires a careful weighing of all those factors which become relevant in each particular case. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The decision whether to authorize a proposal, and if so the conditions under which it will be allowed to occur, are therefore determined by the outcome of the general balancing process. That decision should reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal must be considered including the cumulative effects thereof. Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards and flood plain values (in accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use, navigation, shore erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving the placement of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, a permit will be denied if the discharge that would be authorized by such permit would not comply with the Environmental Protection Agencies' 404(b)(1) guidelines. Subject to the preceding sentence and any other applicable guidelines or criteria, a permit will be granted unless the District Engineer determines that it would be contrary to the public interest. The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition, or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity. -3- Generally, the decision whether to issue this DA permit will not be made until the DEM issues, denies, or waives State certification required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The DEM considers whether or not the proposed activity will comply with Sections 301, 302, 306, and 307 of the Clean Water Act. The application and this public notice for the DA permit serve as application to the DEM for certification. Additional information regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be reviewed at the offices of the Environmental Operations Section, North Carolina Division of Environmental Management, Salisbury Street, Archdale Building, Raleigh, North Carolina. Copies of such materials will be furnished to any person requesting copies upon payment of reproduction costs. The DEM plans to take final action in the issuance of the Clean Water Act certification on or after November 22, 1991. All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application for Clean Water..Act certification should do so in writing delivered to the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management, Post Office Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687, on or before November 18, 1991, Attention: Mr. John Dorney. Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will be received in this office, Attention: David Baker, until 4:15 p.m., November 29, 1991, or telephone (704) 259-0856. lid wv iZ:ii 16-GZ-01 LUTHE?pA7TERSOHS? f•?tfaS ? G. ?, PARIt(vR -ftomm' L=TICN OF FAC:t-ti7CIES7 R el ?trwE ?tf_ ?, It. TRAC'- 7a RIVE-3 .41 L~ _ Sa^tgO 4-i N M?4ch Sh•.I y *M 2M CL/ MUTUAL iq[[r PftA79 f19V1C . CARING AiJN. INC. C" I" At CASml^ K vx, my, ' CNN ?tf M.A. CAOt 97 v1, (rN[L CM1 ? e ficAm t vl&-A oaf A C1411 Ilo. RD N Cr?/1C[ SpVAA 4T VX. MAC Cm [9Z ow• COaC} [7 VX, AMNIC CNM )91 lJ1MCSr o. A[NLANO WALT ET tR m Co.: C oGU1NGRM 97AfC9 p"Cf1 7c Pt sf.cx Rva ECLCTAiG' .tSJA1 rA'C -I i/' S.L. LEDFORD CHR 23ff Whew t L0<-40 W, --cfc. FATTtRSON 2.18 2-i8 CHR 234F XCM-50 ' 2.14 2.15 ? GkR 30 eswa nut nQi $•;:' vANCt LtOF'ORD -t3A are ItETAI.L hAap •? ?^ ••.rr 1I -. ??•? f 3--BA Q 1M02 M-49 •: MCA 1? i7A ?f d9/" so" 3•II 3.12 z_z f C1M ?ss?,(F ?'Q; 85b'0-6So-?Ui.- i NI033 11 ? ? L ! 4 ,, CTW1XR 29SF 0 '{i+ C f!? MAR$NALLtt,, CRAVATT 1,44 A tS'w ? .4 1tCHR•l7 •+r'0 LTV man V cki! 30SF •L C. M'CRACXCNS mcnu cHtl 290E 1 t a' ? xcHq-al3 ? ` WILEY S6 eN11 m I?a6.0z 3- ft •1CA SZ?w-r 3 savao'£ r? 3?tfA ? 3•f ?? •,? ? M. k. NtcH01-SJ'?{F CHR 293E AI- ^ 2 C 3-18 -- 25 • °f a um IxCHR-4? 270 w POOL A.AL 401 CLO ETiLf m- . 3-Z9 k # 1b"2 r-60' 3-i8A MM•r (fM/ U' rY A. eel*~ ;Amwr fn. lrirl SiCMR•7b MMfv fhd, OUVCR GARRISON M Ux 9E6S1ti, CkR 296E MRS. .I, fr sEC LSas CHR df or ?' Vt TIPTON CHR 294r r G. W. VMN I s. 3 ? 20•YVE-42' pOOL _ . 2 ^19- 3-5A- 3-32 7 4.36',1-12 MARSkAf.L RAVA7'T?,\ 9 MCRLt KLINCER CHR 300f sirs t it CLAY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SHEET CHA TU GE 3 RESERVATION D CHATUCE RESERVOIR TENNESSec VALo411rLEY AUTHORITY MAN Af10 [YS see r?^D?, see I f C VF ..,"Q .1566 - 7 lid wv TZ:IT T6-SZ-OI 2-la effe aw ttr wsy,ei a..eer •enTe „eYx gortfort wain. fore. OM aH yF. Cws.e'w w". C..e m .f.&. CASt a ei iswgL aM »r, tAIUM GC tM P•1 7ft WATWU VM.4 aWfU C M•• aw ? cT us fore tore a•>r e.n, etoe? eT ux.,..ff.,e CrM 30f th"Um a. of," ene aee aoeTfftAr 8- is +awcn m 04W RJO? EC[CTtG' oqssK AC ---+ S.L.1.EOF+DRC /?; CMR 23?6F '? w s. PATTERSON CNR 04F? V? C[? 93A SCE DETAIL.. Ne SYS t`' . t NA? ! * 1J ?Y ??P 1 ?. ?aSf0a3E-9A 39 k•02'x•,f 1 L t BITER .&A61 ET wTHEA P„rTCRSOr::? ffGtRS t C. t.. PARKER i' F .w? ! C 3.204-N2a-2r[-I• POOL ? ? l4.3rx•IZ• r `f , rah t t ''r 1 3.208 t ,e6 t 2-i 11 MIE ?? 1 tfwan' O1 i N. ism / \ ~ ?? CT ux A[ cv M•rffn ? Ieif a GNR 29eF •? cyl? ?~ MARSN CRAVATT N 20+31• E ?• ??R 29D0 ttt • :•{ `?. • r' fwwR3NM.i GRAVATT ?\ 9•!S'w ; i • +',• t MCRLL KLINGER ?., tfN ae4 •iA LTN CAGE `til.. CMR 300E Y: CHN IVT ' + i OLIYER GMIRISON •?`' ,fw.oet?, 1 CT ux bEs" 11 tE K ? a96F i f• ns!•ss•w 1 ? =° cagy MRS J L. S ele.n :l3q? 3.0 %CNR•a7 CMR 293E aaxT CMR 00SF i NEOtS ' c .re CNR 290E • ?° lV T11?TON j dw 1 CNR XW \? I %% C. W. TIPTON .t XCNii-fao WILEY Iln•oz - JOA S2•aaw.r PCIOl.--- Saroo•t iu 3N7A •16 F 3.9A - » 3.18A •? , k N. tfICNOLS CNR 2D3F 3-16 '? S sl7 euAVi I f- a w P1XX A.AL. XCMR-44 iJF1EL0 r rv?i A O O 1 ?sl• • 3. f 7 A x 2z . ? 3-p ??I 3-10A x-to• mf r/ rra. ee ~ tend fe rtM IlCMR•7a f wft Ihtt L c." `?""' LOC.iiICN CIF FAC:I.Ii7CIEZ ?tN1E S ?W r,tAc- - C 2- A 7 a Rim X t ue _ S+tgot%N C:re el?? l f I CLAY '*- 1HrY. NOMW CAROLINA sw?r:r CHATUGE 3 RESERVATION D C:HATUCE RESERVOIR 7ENm"m VALLEY AUTHORITY ,.......avn.oa eAUT ?fe f _ fns •t CT .?-- __-_ ? -?Zl. I I 1 W C. ? 1W" I fly `, ? ? h _ z w •.•...• 1. • • • Z• I I I y CD •r.ri'r' i• Q 0 z ' a '" ? II } m ••• , I .... CL J W N w } m ? N ?? YJ ... .J M EL ? E *"q Z) 0 ' Lf q wn . ?? . • .... • • • w ` ? ? J w ...... .1 to } ... w ? •; <C 0- . v • • • .J J z a ' ° i u i..r.. Q. p ? N W • • y i \ ? co A Cf N J Q ` L W W K ti ?r...•... .. CL z 44 CD M W • • • . . K p•1 _ 9C W W z z a L c cv x ue a ae r es TT/OT 'd 37IIA3HSd-300 9Z:TT Z6. SZ 130 oUd r?o o . . o-mac-? i 4 J 7 W o s W ` CL r r r < , VN v ICE C5 C T v1 40 Cie 40- d ' w XL Z (n Q a cn ttLL ?! T ate. w w a L) w}Moa J M O I Q (n l-- L W J W ` W -- LLJ 0 0 Z Q V) ` > CL *. li_ .. T - } LU O R l T l? ,.• LW r .+ ? rr 111 {R _ I `? I T II ZN4 .J Lij W 0 { C? CJ ' ? }r I rI' cn a LL = J W J W r ? ? Q W TT/6,d 373IA3HSU-300 9T:TT T6r SZ 130 b 2 ?m. a ti a ?S d? N w 2 OCT 25 '91 11:16 COE-ASHEVILLE P.9/11 W _ m < m 0-4 N 0 -n • =y 44j) r ~ Jr, Z rf r c r°n 12> C D ? o '?' _"II* <Vt m 4p ?+ .. m v rn dIC --? r (n z z 7> w ch III N -4 - =v ? im a z v o cn o z ..{,t •,? i m _. F 2. 1- '? Cs 93 (A %A rn a) m C 1 ` A • /J !fie Al's vnq Bud /7 7'o P TT/8'd r;'// iA47 / CL/ I c4-3 pVt ctro-410.6 r- C-P -ems Ao re e rv o i r Y/ e. C-0 NO 4ot Csrj t o ez r elev t 7.2:5. .3 .11.?1G v?2 o Cry, yds o? 'P2oPoseo( 4,11 oi-co- bc /o 31IIA3HSH-300 9Z:SZ T6, SE 190 ?IG? r9aa - 9 ?f 4 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers Post Office Box 1890 Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890 Action ID. 199200176 PUBLIC NOTICE O C. DEPT. W' 1j :F r pOMMUN,1-1 ?v - MEA NOV 1 4 991 YIYIJION Of iii ?i• 7-.?•?. '?GRI NDORES"d Lf RELUAL Offa 31, 1991 October BURGESS G. PATTON, 4375 HIDDEN COURT, COLLEGE PARK, GEORGIA 30349 has applied for a Department of the Army (DA) permit TO DISCHARGE FILL MATERIAL INTO CHATUGE RESERVOIR, IN SHOOTING CREEK OPPOSITE HIWASSEE RIVER MILE 121.OR, -IN-CONJUNCTION WITH EXCAVATION OF AN ACCESS CHANNEL TO HIS EXISTING DOCKING FACILITIES AND THE FILLING OF AN ABANDONED MINE HOLE BELOW FULL POOL ELEVATION NEAR Hayesville, Clay Count orth Carolina. The following description of the work is taken from data provided by the applicant and from observations made during an onsite visit by representatives ,of_-the..Corps of Engineers. Plans submitted with the application show the excavation of approximately 400 cubic yards of material from a 100-foot-long by 54-foot-wide access channel. The channel is to have a 30-foot-bottom width with 3:1 sideslopes. Excavation is to be accomplished by bulldozer when lake levels are drawn down (in the dry). In addition, approximately 40 cubic yards of the excavated material will be deposited within an irregular shaped abandoned minehole to eliminate a health and safety problem. The remainder of the excavated material will be disposed of above the full pool elevation of Chatuge Reservoir. The access channel is to be deepened to allow swimming and boating access during drawdown periods. Plans showing the work are included with this public notice. The State of North Carolina will review this public notice to determine the need for the applicant to obtain any required State authorization. No DA permit will be issued until the coordinated State viewpoint on the proposal has been received and reviewed by this agency, nor will a DA permit be issued until the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (DEM) has determined the applicability of a Water Quality Certificate as required by PL 92-500. This application is being considered pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Any person may request, in writing within the comment period specified in the notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearing shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. The District Engineer has consulted the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places for the presence or absence of registered properties, or properties listed as being eligible for inclusion therein, and this worksite is not registered property or property listed as being eligible for inclusion in the Register. Consultation of the National Register constitutes the extent of cultural resource investigations by the District 7 AM -2- Engineer, and he is otherwise unaware of the presence of such resources. Presently, unknown archeological, scientific, prehistorical, or historical data may be lost or destroyed by work under the requested permit. • fh 1 The District Engineer, based on available information, is not aware that the proposed activity will affect-species,-or their critical habitat, designated as endangered or threatened pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973. The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity and its intended use on the public interest. Evaluation of the probable impacts which the proposed activity may have on the public interest requires a careful weighing of all those factors which become relevant in each particular case. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The decision whether to authorize a proposal, and if so the conditions under which lt-will-.be-allowed to occur, are therefore determined by the outcome of the general balancing process. That decision should reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal must be considered including the cumulative effects thereof. Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards and flood plain values (in accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use, navigation, shore erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving the placement of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, a permit will be denied if the discharge that would be authorized by such permit would not comply with the Environmental Protection Agencies' 404(b)(1) guidelines. Subject to the preceding sentence and any other applicable guidelines or criteria, a permit will be granted unless the District Engineer determines that it would be contrary to the public interest. The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition, or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity. - 0-1 M V -3- Generally, the decision whether to issue this DA permit will not be made until the DEM issues, denies, or waives State certification required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The DEM considers whether or not the proposed activity will comply with Sections 301, 302, 306, and 307 of the Clean Water Act. The application and this public notice for the DA permit serve as application to the DEM for certification. Additional information regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be reviewed at the offices of the Environmental Operations Section, North Carolina Division of Environmental Management, Salisbury Street, Archdale Building, Raleigh, North Carolina. Copies of such materials will be furnished to any person requesting copies upon payment of reproduction costs. The DEM plans to take final action in the issuance of the Clean Water Act certification on or after November 22, 1991. All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application for Clean . .Water-Act.certification should do so in writing delivered to the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management, Post Office Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687, on or before November 18, 1991, Attention: Mr. John Dorney. Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will be received in this office, Attention: David Baker, until 4:15 p.m., November 29, 1991, or telephone (704) 259-0856. t F? IT,[ WV JZ:IT 16-SE-01 .A'„ a•w www 4 dN da K/ UUTVAL dl•tET WTATO IIWSC CURING A4=N. INC. 171n 211 M./. A&," CT VY 0[N..• CNR m M.a• CAst CT km, tTNCI. CIM 219 UA" Nowto CNR Uo WATRICE we" sq%j CNA 7M Cmim" ovAA CNle 20- C.A. LtO/pRS CT V[.MAE CNN $92 tile . CDOC? tT Vx, ANNIC CNR ?O1 GNCdT o, ACNLANs CNN 2M AoU17K71N dMTtA ""CA m swc R.,06Y EGLCTi7G1 '14:4 ArC -"^?"? 1 'r S.L. LEDFORD /fir/ CM 2361 IKK, ` w A, ??f'ICMRZ72?F PATTERSON '' 2•!e 2-Je CHR 234F 1' Yf UN_•w LEDfpRb '!3A SEE *VAI.L::'- NA mrs "`-- r?s kCHR-s! .? 2"m I- sYJ ? ?Q? .. Ls% \9' NII:TA ?. CNR.f1! A.AL. AXIELD ET t $A.1 WAITER 96At5/ ET ?j?R 23TR„?:' e 41'b? i S9.2S'w eNle 1•GIRS ; C. t.. BARKER 3-4 3.2OA p r 1. 3208 I ?a 2-I Nza!srC '??'?? tMl,bT?, ? ; ? H HEIRS U4 A 0-- CMR 29l? - •- .TVIr kCHR•aT r I.ERS$ hdfRS CHR sOSf .? a >rl•cRwCxEN's CJTR 24CIF t i t1.9ERgQN OrwfYER LARRISOM M ux eesslc CMR 2968 MRS..J.4 SEL44S CHR 29SP G W. TlPTON •? CHR I9aF G. W. T1?1'CEN 1 xcfrr*-aa Kt++. Nlcr,o?.s CMR 293E Gl.rt If TY A. INIIw•d rA?sh71 rw MM Y7EMR•76 wNfln 7yTt witeY 3 Ses•oo/E 3-l6 ' ssz7o• w POOL -- 300A asr•zz•w a-29? 3-t8A brroz/ w_001 f } t. 7 a?4 N2e•trt -Ar a-2oA- ? .3`SA- 3-+32 2a• 3A,w.ii POOL". 2^f4- #eARSMwti GitwVATT L MCRLE KLlNCER CHR 30of ii'?is y v • n T;tAC,- - ??-?- v'Z 7 'Z ? "4101111111- LCGtTIG1 CF.FAC:I.tTtCIfiS3 atlW£ - r? 7 ?W RiYSR .41 t~ S?'lp°f;N Cr i SHEET CLAY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA CHA TU GE RESERVATION D CHATUCtr RESt;AVOtR tENP1[33EE VALLEY AUTHORITY b?lA/1A tVllvlYt sRANd Soo sER NO Gw ai ,lOnp ts00 TM U l6 Y•'v v 7?.7,, • ;7E'• A , ca v w ? Z 1 W o - 1 i •, W a ll. z a t u W m \ N ,• Q J 'Q W N \ w W QO z y •... W 41 w F- 0 z TT/OZ'd _O • 7 _ V 1 ti w au J ? W W ., ?. c. 7? • • • • "• .J tat w © L) t •....• r • •? W w. r? W W l?,j?` s Zt; Ca z ?$ • • • • : • ; Q ?° .. 7 a x w c? .J z z ? a L) 31IIA3HSH-300 9Z :TZ Z6. SZ 100 ?S IC7 fFi x a r L? YIb' o<< 0-50-? 6 0 d } W XL W 4 ,t 2 1`ti 4LL th ? l? Z , `? Q {? W tti J W z t V) > z -?-- ,. z L L_L. a.. J •J I W O J V Z F- W Z M f? FR ? 1.tJ * l l _... LU a t r" J ({) !L LL O _lU J W J ¢ W W L) U O rl(?' W h- Q Z ,tit lTrr c rn ti Q hi c c N O a cc LL, z R R IZi6'd 37IIA3HSd-300 9Z:ZZ Z6. SE 100 6ua - -c P TT/9'd r'// W,7/ CL1 t aA-0 pgsi4-r'vt dreL;klo5r- o-P- e r ?Ao YI -e- 1,0 ?l0 - I 7000t Cs?atou.r elerr t 9 ? 3.3 ? 0 Ccc.. yds o? ,?,?/ ?aterr'a1 boo/ 31IIA3HSU-300 9Z:TT T6. Sz 100 !,Gr 19aa . 9 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEEI P.O. BOX 1890 WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890 October 30, 1991 IN REPLY REFER TO S : Dec Regulatory Branch Action ID. 199200176 Mr. John Dorney Water Quality Section Division of Environmental Management North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Post Office Box 27687 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Dear Mr. Dorney: 7 .Enclosed is the application of Burgess G. Patton, for Department of the Army authorization and a State Water Quality Certification to discharge fill material below the full pool elevation of Lake Chatuge in conjunction with the excavation of an access channel and the elimination of an abandoned minehole at his property near Hayesville, Clay County, North Carolina. Your receipt of this letter verifies your acceptance of a valid request for certification in accordance with Section 325.2(b)(ii) of our administrative regulations. We are considering authorizing the proposed activity pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and we have determined that a water quality certification may be required under the provisions of Section 401 of the same law. A Department of the Army permit will not be granted until the certification has been obtained or waived. In accordance with our administrative regulations, 60 days after receipt of a request for certification is a reasonable time for State action. Therefore, if you have not acted on the request by December 31, 1991, the District Engineer will deem that waiver has occurred. Questions or comments may be addressed to David Baker, telephone (704) 259-0856. Sincerely, M ne Wri t hie , Regulatory Branch F°t NOS 15 g1 f- 91?c? y ,?d?? onth Enclosure *,- - k State of North Caroli Department of Environment, Health, f W, 512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, o'rt James G. Martin, Governor January 21, Dr. G. Wayne Wright Corps of Engineers P. 0. Box 1890 Wilmington, NC 28402 Dear Dr. Wright: h l r 07611 ,`•r' V?illi? ? Pl ?n°sn9 . Cobey, Jr., Secretary In keeping with your request, this office has circulated to interested state review agencies U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Public Notice Action ID. 199200176 dated October 31, 1991 which describes an excavation and fill project proposed by Burgess G. Patton of College Park, Georgia. The project, including the excavation of a 100 foot long access channel and the filling of a "minehole" which is situated below full pool elevation, is located on Chatuge Reservoir, near Hayesville in Clay County. Based on a coordinated agency review, the state interposes no objection to the proposed project provided certain environmental safeguards as proposed by two key review agencies. are made a part of the COE. permit. These recommendations and the agency submitting each follow: Division of Environmental Management - issued the required Section 401 Water Quality Certification on December 10. Certification No. 2652 carries stabilization and turbidity requirements; N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission - found the proposed project should have a minimal impact on fisheries resources of the Reservoir and recommended the following: 1) Stringent erosion control measures should be implemented where soil is disturbed and maintained until project completion. 2) Temporary ground cover should be placed on bare surfaces, including spoil piles, as soon as construction is complete. Permanent vegetation in these same areas must be established within 15 days of project completion to provide long term erosion control. P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone 919-733-4984 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer Dr. Wayne Wright Page 2 January 21, 1992 Other responding agencies provided no specific recommendations. This viewpoint position support the above stated recommendations. Should you require additional input from the state on this matter, do not hesitate to contact this office or the responding agencies. Very sincerely, V J?. Parker, 'J . In?nd '404 Coordinator JRP:jr/aw cc: Division of Environmental Management Wildlife Resources Commission COE-Asheville