20100123 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report Final_20180206

FINAL
YEAR 2 (2017) ANNUAL
MONITORING REPORT
NEIGHBORS BRANCH/WALTON CRAWLEY BRANCH
STREAM & WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
NCDMS Project No. 92872
Contract No. D09023
USACE Action ID No. SAW -2009-917 & NCDWR Project No. 10-0122
SCO No. 08-07308-01
McDowell County, North Carolina
Data Collection: May -November 2017
Submission: December 2017
PREPARED FOR:
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
1601 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1601

FINAL
YEAR 2 (2017) ANNUAL
MONITORING REPORT
NEIGHBORS BRANCH/WALTON CRAWLEY BRANCH
STREAM & WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
NCDMS Project No. 92872
Contract No. D09023
USACE Action ID No. SAW -2009-917 & NCDWR Project No. 10-0122
SCO No. 08-07308-01
McDowell County, North Carolina
Data Collection: May -November 2017
Submission: December 2017
PREPARED BY:
AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
218 SNOW AVENUE
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27603

Ak
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
December 5, 2017
Mr. Matthew Reid
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
5 Ravenscroft Drive, #102
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue, Raleigh, NC 27603 919-215-1693
RE: Neighbors Branch/ Walton Crawley Branch Monitoring (DMS Project # 92879, Contract # D09023S)
Final Year 2 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report 12-004.21
Dear Matthew:
Axiom Environmental, Inc. (AXE) is pleased to provide you with three hard copies and one cd of electronic files for the Final
Neighbors Branch/ Walton Crawley Branch Year 2 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report. We received your comments via email
on December 4, 2017 and have addressed them as follows.
Wetland Hydrology: Report indicates that Gauge 1 malfunctioned during the growing season. Has the gauge been
replaced or repaired? Please add a statement in this section stating the corrective action and that the gauge is
functioning correctly.
The wetland hydrology discussion was updated to read as follows: "Gauge 1 malfunctioned for 6 days (July 29 to
August 3, 2017) during the growing season. It is unclear why the gauge was not taking measurements during this
time, but it appeared to be functioning properly before and after the malfunction, and it was checked and reset at the
time of the next data download. The gauge had no more issues for the remainder of the growing season. Based on
precipitation data as well as data from Gauge 2, it is expected that this gauge would have continued to be
saturated/inundated during this 6 day period. "
• Table 2: Under Year 2 Monitoring, please add two lines of additional data with dates. One for vegetation monitoring
and one for geomorphology monitoring. The IRT would like to know when data is being collected for the monitoring
years. Please do this for all future monitoring report submissions.
These rows were added to Table 2, and these will be added for all future monitoring report submissions.
• Cross-sections and Table 11 a: Please calculate BHR for cross-sections. If the BHR has been calculated, please increase
the significant digits to 3 places to account for rounding and to show small changes over the course of monitoring (Ex:
1.0 changed to 1.002 or similar).
The bank height ratio was recalculated for all cross-sections, and since no cross-sections have exhibited any stream
bed elevation change during the monitoring period, all cross-sections have a bank height ratio of]. 0. This indicates
minimal geomorphic change and good cross-sectional stability across the site.
• In the future, please use a date stamp on photos. The IRT has requested this be included with all photos.
All Axiom staff have been notified to use a time -stamp on all future monitoring photos.
• As Axiom had done in the past, please include a response to the comment letter and how/where the comments were
addressed. Please insert this letter directly behind the cover page and before the table of contents in the final
deliverables. The IRT has requested that we include this letter with the final deliverables. The response letter will need
to be included with all future monitoring deliverables.
This letter has been inserted into the report between the cover page and table of contents.

NC Division of Mitigation Services Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Neighbors Branch/ Walton Crawley Branch Monitoring
Page 2 of 2
A .
Please let us know if you have any questions or comments regarding any component of this submittal. Thank you for the
opportunity to continue to assist the Division of Mitigation Services with this important project.
Sincerely,
AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
Kenan R. Jernigan
Project Scientist
Attachments: 3 hard copies Year 2 (2017) Neighbors Branch/ Walton Crawley Branch Annual Monitoring Report
1 CD containing digital support files

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY..............................................................
2.0 METHODS.................................................................................
3.0 REFERENCES...........................................................................
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A. SITE LOCATION MAP AND BACKGROUND TABLES
Figure 1. Site Location
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Units
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Attributes Table
APPENDIX B. VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figures 2, 2A-213. Current Conditions Plan View
Figures 3, 3A -3B. Project Assets
Tables 5A -5E. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Stream Fixed Station Photo Points
Vegetation Plot Photographs
APPENDIX C. VEGETATION DATA
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Success Summary
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 9. Total Planted Stems by Plot and Species
APPENDIX D. STREAM MEASUREMENT AND GEOMORPHOLOGY DATA
Cross-section Plots
Longitudinal Profile Plots
Substrate Plots
Tables IOA- IOB. Baseline Morphology and Hydraulic Summary
Tables 11A -11D. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
APPENDIX E. HYDROLOGY DATA
Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Table 13. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Summary
Figure E1. 30-70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall
Groundwater Gauge Graphs
1
4
6
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Monitoring Year 2 or 5 (2017)
DMS Project No. 92872 December 2017
McDowell County, NC Table of Contents

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
The North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS) has established the Neighbors
Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site (Site). The primary goals of the
project focused on improving water quality and long term stability by reducing nutrient loading from the
on-site cattle and horse operation, reducing excess sedimentation input from Site channel banks and
contributing non jurisdictional tributaries/drainages, reducing excess sedimentation from Site access roads
and deteriorated crossings, increasing the attenuation of floodwater flows, reintroducing natural watershed
flows to Walton Crawley Branch by removing a pond and restoring the channel through its natural valley,
and restoring and enhancing aquatic and riparian habitat. Long term stability will be evidenced by channels
maintaining stable inverts and banks over an extended period of time.
These goals were accomplished through the following objectives.
• Reduce point (i.e. cattle/horses directly accessing the channel) and non -point source (i.e.
stormwater runoff through pastures) pollution associated with an on-site cattle and horse operation
by installing exclusionary fencing along the stream and riparian buffer, and by providing a
vegetative buffer on stream banks and adjacent floodplains to treat nutrient enriched surface runoff
from adjacent pastureland.
• Stabilize degraded portions of on-site streams, eroding ephemeral/stormwater channels, and
existing maintained dirt roads to reduce sediment inputs. Stabilization methods included:
o Restoring a stable dimension, pattern, and profile to selected sections of channels to ensure
the channel will transport and attenuate watershed flows and sediment loads without
aggrading or degrading.
o Stabilize selected channel banks by excavating bankfull benches, placing stream structures
to reduce shearing forces on outside meander bends, and planting native vegetative species
to provide soil stability.
o Stabilize ephemeral/stormwater channels by planting native vegetation along eroded banks
and floodplain and constructing stabilization weirs through the channel valley to lower
facet slopes and decrease erosion.
o Place gravel along existing degraded soil roads that are situated adjacent to Site streams.
• Reintroduce natural watershed flows to Walton Crawley Branch by restoring the channel through
the low point of the natural valley and removing a dam that impedes natural down valley flows.
• Improve aquatic habitat by enhancing stream bed variability, providing shading/covered areas
within the stream channel, and introducing woody debris in the form of rootwads, log vanes, and
log sills.
• Enhance fish passage within Neighbors Branch and Walton Crawley Creek. This was accomplished
by eliminating a pond and restoring the stream through the natural valley and by restoring
Neighbors Branch and replacing an existing perched culvert to allow fish passage upstream.
• Enhance riparian wildlife habitat by:
o Fencing cattle out of existing wetlands and planting impacted wetlands with native
vegetative species. Wetlands were also restored by raising Site stream inverts to allow
groundwater tables to rise throughout the affected valleys.
o Fencing livestock out of existing and restored riparian buffers as well as installing
alternative watering devices that will ensure livestock have sufficient watering areas. This
is detailed further in the Farm Management Plans completed for the Site by NCDMS.
o Vegetating the existing fescue dominated riparian buffers with native trees, shrubs, herbs,
and grasses. Forest vegetation species were selected by studying a Reference Forest
Ecosystem located on-site and reviewing Montane Alluvial Forest species listed in
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Monitoring Year 2 or 5 (2017)
DMS Project No. 92872 December 2017
McDowell County, NC page 1

Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina: Third Approximation
(Schafale and Weakley 1990).
• Creating wildlife corridors through agricultural lands which have significantly dissected the
landscape. The corridors will provide connectivity to a diversity of habitats including mature forest,
early successional forest, stream -side forest, riparian wetlands, and uplands.
The Site is located approximately six miles southeast of the town of Marion (Figure 1, Appendix B). The
Site is situated due southwest of the intersection of Deer Park Road and Harmony Grove Road in McDowell
County, North Carolina and is located within the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Hydrologic Unit
and Targeted Local Watershed 03050101040010 (North Carolina Division of Water Quality Subbasin 03-
08-30) of the Catawba River Basin and will service USGS 8 -digit Cataloging Unit 03050101.
The contributing watersheds are characterized primarily by forest land (approximately 84 percent of the
total area) with pasture at the lower elevations (approximately 10 percent of the total area) and low-density
residential development scattered along the outer fringes of the watershed. Impervious surfaces appear to
account for approximately one percent of the watershed land surface. Prior to Site construction, riparian
vegetation had been removed, stream channels were manipulated, and hoof shear from livestock on stream
banks and floodplain soils was responsible for degraded water quality and unstable channel characteristics
(stream entrenchment, erosion, and bank collapse).
Project mitigation efforts resulted in the following:
• Restore 2456 linear feet of Site streams
• Enhance (Level I) 202 linear feet of Site streams
• Enhance (Level II) 1863 linear feet of Site streams
• Preserve 3139 linear feet of Site streams
• Restore 0.52 acre of existing hydric soils to riparian wetlands
• Enhance 1.62 acres of riparian wetlands
• Preserve 1.29 acres of riparian wetlands
The Muddy Creek Restoration Partnership (Partnership) was formed in 1998 to address impacts to the
Muddy Creek Watershed. The Partnership completed the Muddy Creek Watershed Restoration Initiative
Feasibility Report and Restoration Plan (Watershed Plan) for the Muddy Creek Watershed in December
of 2003 (MCRP 2003). Since 2004 NCDMS has informally participated in the Partnership by implementing
priority projects named by the partnership and adopted the 2003 report as part of its Local Watershed Plan
(LWP). The NCDMS's Upper Catawba River Basin Restoration Priorities (2009) identifies North Muddy
Creek as a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW). The Site is located within the North Muddy Creek
Watershed. In 2008 NCDMS contracted with a consulting firm to conduct outreach programs with
landowners and identify additional project sites in the Muddy Creek Watershed.
The primary goals identified by the Partnership's Watershed Plan include the following.
1. Restore the Watershed to its Full Intended Use
2. Restore Riparian Buffers
3. Enhance Open Space Preservation
4. Improve Water Quality
5. Restore Physical Habitat
6. Establish a Trout Fishery
The Watershed Plan listed the following components of watershed restoration to be expected:
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Monitoring Year 2 or 5 (2017)
DMS Project No. 92872 December 2017
McDowell County, NC page 2

1. Natural Channel Design Stream Restoration
2. Riparian Reforestation
3. Livestock Exclusion
4. Riparian Forest Preservation
These four components were included within the Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Site
Mitigation Plan (NCDMS 2013). The project restored the watershed to its full intended use by restoring a
stream, floodplain, and riparian wetland ecosystem through stream and wetland restoration, enhancement,
and preservation. The project restored riparian buffers through revegetation of buffer zones with native
riparian and wetland species along all Site streams. The project enhanced open space preservation by
placing Site streams, wetlands, and their buffers into a permanent conservation easement. The overall Site
helps improve water quality by reducing sedimentation in on -Site streams and planted a vegetated riparian
buffer that filters nutrients from adjacent pasturelands. Additionally, exclusionary fencing and alternate
watering devices removed livestock from accessing on-site channels and riparian buffers. The project
restored and enhanced physical habitat for both aquatic and terrestrial species by planting native vegetation
along stream banks and riparian buffers, creating wildlife corridors through a dissected landscape, and
restoring bedform variability to Site streams. The stabilization of streams and buffers in the project area
enhanced water quality in downstream receiving waters, which should help in the re-establishment of the
watershed's ability to host trout and enhance their ability to propagate.
Site design was completed on March 7, 2013. Site construction and planting were completed in December
2015. Completed project activities, reporting history, completion dates, project contacts, and project
attributes are summarized in Tables 1-4 (Appendix A).
Stream Success Criteria: Success criteria for stream restoration will include 1) successful classification
of the reach as a functioning stream system (Rosgen 1996) and 2) channel variables indicative of a stable
stream system.
Collected data will be utilized to determine the success in restoring stream channel stability. Specifically,
the width -to -depth ratio and bank -height ratios should be indicative of a stable or moderately unstable
channel with minimal changes in cross-sectional area, channel width, and/or bank erosion along the
monitoring reach. In addition, channel abandonment and/or shoot cutoffs must not occur and sinuosity
values must remain relatively constant. Visual assessment of instream structures will be conducted to
determine if failure has occurred. Failure of a structure may be indicated by collapse of the structure,
undermining of the structure, abandonment of the channel around the structure, and/or stream flow beneath
the structure.
Stream Dimension: General maintenance of a stable cross-section and hydrologic access to the
floodplain features over the course of the monitoring period will generally represent success in
dimensional stability. Some changes in dimension (such as lowering of bankfull width) should be
expected. Riffle cross-sections should generally maintain a bank -height ratio approaching 1.0, with
some variation in this ratio naturally occurring. Pool cross-sections naturally adjust based on recent
flows and time between flows, therefore more leeway on pool cross-section geometry is expected.
Stream Pattern and Profile: The profile should not demonstrate significant trends towards
degradation or aggradation over a significant portion of a reach. Additionally, bed form variables
should remain noticeably intact and consistent with original design parameters that were based off
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Monitoring Year 2 or 5 (2017)
DMS Project No. 92872 December 2017
McDowell County, NC page 3

of reference conditions. Pattern features should show little adjustment over the standard 5 -year
monitoring period and will be monitored to ensure adjustment is minor prior to close out.
Substrate: Substrate measurements should indicate the progression towards or the maintenance of
the known distributions from the design phase.
Sediment Transport: There should be an absence of any significant trend in the aggradational or
depositional potential of the channel.
Hydraulics: A minimum of two bankfull events must be documented within the standard 5 -year
monitoring period. The two bankfull events shall occur within separate years.
Vegetation Success Criteria: Success criteria have been established to verify that the vegetation
component supports community elements necessary for forest development. Success criteria are dependent
upon the density and growth of characteristic forest species. An average density of 320 stems per acre of
planted stems must be surviving in the first three monitoring years. Subsequently, 290 planted stems per
acre must be surviving in year 4 and 260 planted stems per acre in year 5.
Wetland Hydrology Success Criteria: Target hydrological characteristics include saturation or
inundation for 5 to 12.5 percent of the growing season, during average climatic conditions. During growing
seasons with atypical climatic conditions, groundwater gauges in reference wetlands may dictate threshold
hydrology success criteria (75 percent of reference). These areas are expected to support hydrophytic
vegetation. If wetland parameters are marginal as indicated by vegetation and/or hydrology monitoring, a
jurisdictional determination will be performed.
2.0 METHODS
Monitoring of restoration efforts will be performed for five years, or until success criteria are fulfilled.
Monitoring is proposed for the stream channel, vegetation, and wetland hydrology. In general, the
restoration success criteria, and required remediation actions, are based on the Stream Mitigation Guidelines
(USACE et al. 2003). Monitoring features are described below and are depicted on Figures 2A -B
(Appendix B).
Streams
The restored stream reaches are proposed to be monitored for geometric activity as follows.
• 1750 linear feet of stream profile
• 5 riffle cross-sections
• 3 pool cross-section
The data will be presented in graphic and tabular format. Data to be presented will include 1) cross-
sectional area, 2) bankfull width, 3) average depth, 4) maximum depth, 5) width -to -depth ratio, 6) meander
wavelength, 7) belt -width, 8) water surface slope, and 9) sinuosity. Substrate analysis will be evaluated
through pebble counts at five cross sections and data presented as a D50 for stream classification and
tracking purposes. The stream will subsequently be classified according to stream geometry and substrate
(Rosgen 1996). Significant changes in channel morphology will be tracked and reported by comparing data
in each successive monitoring year. Annual photographs will include 43 fixed station photographs
(Appendix B). In addition, the Site contains two stream crest gauges to assist with documentation of
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Monitoring Year 2 or 5 (2017)
DMS Project No. 92872 December 2017
McDowell County, NC page 4

bankfull events. One bankfull event has been documented to date during monitoring year 2 (2017) making
a total of two documented bankfull events (Table 12, Appendix E).
Early in Year 1 (2016), several structures were damaged by significant storm events that occurred shortly
after Site construction. Warranty repair work was completed in October 2016 to address these issues. The
repaired structures appeared stable during Year 2 (2017). They will be monitored throughout the remainder
of the monitoring contract to determine if the repair work sufficiently resolved the issues and if any
additional repairs will be required. Currently, stream measurements are meeting success criteria.
Vegetation
Restoration monitoring procedures for vegetation will monitor plant survival and species diversity. Planted
areas within the Site include approximately 12.3 acres. After planting of the area was completed, eight
vegetation plots were installed and monitored at the Site; annual monitoring results can be found in
Appendix C. Annual measurements of vegetation will consist of 8 CVS vegetation plots.
A photographic record of plant growth should be included in each annual monitoring report; current
monitoring photographs are included in Appendix B. During the first year, vegetation will receive a
cursory, visual evaluation on a periodic basis to ascertain the degree of overtopping of planted elements by
nuisance species. Subsequently, quantitative sampling of vegetation will be performed as outlined in the
CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) in September of the first
monitoring year and annually between June 1 and September 30 for the remainder of the monitoring period
until vegetation success criteria are achieved.
Year 2 stem count measurements indicate planted stem densities are well above the required 320 stems per
acre. Planted stem density across the Site is 440 planted stems per acre (Table 9, Appendix Q. In addition,
all eight individual CVS plots met success criteria based on planted stems alone (Table 7, Appendix Q.
Therefore, the Site is currently meeting vegetation success criteria.
Wetland Hydrology
Two groundwater monitoring gauges were installed to take measurements after hydrological modifications
were performed at the Site. Hydrological sampling will occur quarterly throughout the growing season
(March 26 to November 5). Approximate locations of gauges are depicted on Figure 2A (Appendix B) and
hydrology data can be found in Appendix E.
Both gauges were saturated or inundated for well over 12.5 percent of the growing season. The groundwater
level at both gauges remained within 12 inches of the surface for the entire growing season (225 days).
Gauge 1 malfunctioned for 6 days (July 29 to August 3, 2017) during the growing season. It is unclear why
the gauge was not taking measurements during this time, but it appeared to be functioning properly before
and after the malfunction, and it was checked and reset at the time of the next data download. The gauge
had no more issues for the remainder of the growing season. Based on precipitation data as well as data
from Gauge 2, it is expected that this gauge would have continued to be saturated/inundated during this 6
day period. Wetland hydrology is currently meeting success criteria.
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Monitoring Year 2 or 5 (2017)
DMS Project No. 92872 December 2017
McDowell County, NC page 5

3.0 REFERENCES
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation. Version 4.2. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Muddy Creek Restoration Partners (MCRP), 2003. Feasibility Report and Restoration Plan for the Muddy
Creek Watershed.
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). 2013. Neighbor Branch/Walton Crawley
Branch Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan. North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Raleigh, North
Carolina.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). 2009. Upper Catawba River Basin
Restoration Priorities 2009 (online). Available:
http://www.nceep.net/services/restplans/Upper_Catawba_RBRP_2009.pdf [March 12, 2009].
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Rosgen D. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology. Pagosa Springs, Colorado.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina:
Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and
Recreation, North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. Raleigh,
North Carolina.
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), United States Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA), North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC), Natural Resources
Conservation Service (MRCS), and North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2003.
Stream Mitigation Guidelines. State of North Carolina.
Weather Underground. 2017. Station KFQD at Bostic, North Carolina (online). Available:
www.wunderground.com/historL/aiiport/KFQD/ [November 27, 2017]. Weather Underground.
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Monitoring Year 2 or 5 (2017)
DMS Project No. 92872 December 2017
McDowell County, NC page 6

Appendix A.
Site Location Map and Background Tables
Figure 1. Site Location
Table 1. Project Mitigation Components
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Attributes Table
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Monitoring Year 2 or 5 (2017)
DMS Project No. 92872 December 2017
McDowell County, NC Appendices

tow
fr Imo:. - C Co . / ./.- ..ti
t -
-.43_� �4 r.Y; _.. Axiom Env ro me is1. Pfic.
Prepared for:
Roti r' �•~ =
- f ;'.' NC Department of
°� �. , ,�:: -'' y i Environmental
1 _
--- , '4 L�-- r r� •` �. 7 ; Quality
Pre
d . A a. ' Division of
.� R
■.,u� r -; Y _� 1 dq `Qark �. = `ti F> Mitigation
Services
opyrigt©2013 Nations og a• ct�
�—
V ��`w_ - - - ` - , _ •� �y� - ._ �' L Project:
Neighbors Branch/
<- Walton Crawley
-
':`: Branch Stream
CD
and Wetland
_ - Restoration Site
., IRxc� DMS Project
# 92872
t [.......• .� t ,;. -. -_ :. •' McDowell County, NC
a l _i~ S� 11 �•- Title:
- -'� - "''' �:` -yc'�• '.V l ! �V .•4agy� s, .;�- �. ter- '_
Marion . - _ _ ;� O'� �; �i Site Location
1 ' ��C•' _ ,r_ 226 � i g �,..�.;�.
__ � .fyerjJ. - . iF— ¢ I k •!C—" 4 �l i/ NM �A � . ` ' ♦ [ 1 i ~J .
\L 3. 26 �� i - - _ �•�_.. _ _� - _--4 Drawn by:
�-:. _ -•.... - KRJ
1 a'
Date:
JUN 2016
`, dry; . Scale:
1:30000
Project No.:
12-004.21
uSGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map (Marion E, NC Quad)
�-r 4,'... :�..1 t, "- Directions to the Site from Raleigh: FIGURE
1
e.4 e - Follow Interstate 40 West for approximately 193.8 miles,
From Interstate 40 take exit 90 (towards Nebo/Lake James) onto Harmony Grove Road (SR1760),
} r, ,= =� �• , - Head southeast on Harmony Grove Road (SR 1760) for approximately 1.5 miles,
Continue onto Walnut Grove Drive (gravel road) at the intersection with Deer Park Road,
Follow Walnut Grove Drive for approximately 0.5 mile to the Site.
Copyrighf:© 2013 Nat onal`Geographic Site Latitude/Longitude: 35.6599°N, 81.9002'W (NAD83/WGS84)
�•Society'-cubed
i

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site/ DMS Number 92872
Mitigation Credit Summations
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Nonriparian Wetland
Buffer
Nitrogen Offset
Phosphorous Offset
3964
1.59
---
---
---
---
Projects
Components
Project Component—or-Reach
Existing
RestorationRestoration
Mitigation
Mitigation
ID
Stationing
Footage or
Footage or
Level/Equivalent
Ratio
Credits
Comment
Acreage
Acreage
Channel returned to natural valley. The easement
15+40 —27+36
1196
break at the road crossing has been removed from
Walton Crawley
(09+37 — 21+68)
1231-35 =
Restoration (PI)
1:1
1196
credit summation.
1196
Removed 35 feet from credit calculations for
2498
road crossing.
Walton Crawley
29+11 —29+23
12
Enhance I
1.5:1
8
Bank grading and stabilization.
27+36 —29+11
Fence cattle out of easement area and remove
Walton Crawley
29+23 —29+90
242
Enhance II
2.5:1
97
invasive plants. The easement break at 29+90
has been removed from credit summation.
Walton Crawley
10+00 — 15+40
1051
Preservation
5:1
210
The easement break has been removed from
29+90 — 35+01
credit summation.
UT 1 Walton Crawley
18+13 —20+01
188
Restoration (PI)
1:1
188
Restore channel through existing pond and
As -built Plan Stationing
(10+00 — 11+88)
872
188
reconnect to Walton Crawley.
UT 1 Walton Crawley
14+83 —18+13
330
Enhance II
2.5:1
132
Fence cattle out of easement area and remove
invasive plants.
UT 1 Walton Crawley
10+00 — 14+83
483
Preservation
5:1
97
The easement break has been removed from
credit summation.
10+00 — 13+83
UT 2 Walton Crawley
(10+00 — 13+83)
549
Restoration (PI)
1:1
549
Channel routed to the center of the valley, away
As -built Plan Stationing
16+36 —18+02
549
from toe of slope.
(10+00— 11+66
600
UT 2 Walton Crawley
13+83 —16+36
253
Enhance II
2.5:1
101
Fence cattle out of easement area and remove
invasive plants.
Channel routed through low point of valley and
523
invert raised from perched culvert. The easement
Neighbors Branch
24+74 —29+97
559523 6 =
Restoration (PI)
1:1
523
break at the road crossing has been removed from
As -built Plan Stationing
(09+93 —15+52)
credit summation.
2262
Removed 36 feet from credit calculations for
road crossing.
Place channel structure and stabilize bank. The
Neighbors Branch
18+89 —19+09
20
Enhance I
1.5:1
13
easement break has been removed from credit
summation.
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Monitoring Year 2 or 5 (2017)
DMS Project No. 92872 December 2017
McDowell County, NC Appendices

Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Monitoring Year 2 or 5 (2017)
DMS Project No. 92872 December 2017
McDowell County, NC Appendices
18+69—
18+89
Fence cattle out of easement area and matt, seed,
Neighbors Branch
19+09 —24+74
927
Enhance II
2.5:1
371
and plant vegetation on scoured banks.
29+97 —33+39
Neighbors Branch
09+67 —18+69
902
Preservation
5:1
180
The easement break has been removed from
credit summation.
10+56 —10+95
UT 1 Neighbors Branch
11+50 —
12+81
170
Enhance I
1.5:1
113
Bank grading and stabilization.
As -built Plan Stationing
(10+06
—10+44
281
170
10+77 —
12+09)
UT 1 Neighbors Branch
10+00 —10+56
111
Enhance II
2.5:1
44
Fence cattle out of easement area and plant
10+95 —11+50
vegetation.
UT 3 Neighbors Branch
11+72 —18+75
703
703
Preservation
5:1
141
---
Riparian Wetland
---
0.0
0.52
Restoration
1:1
0.52
Restore hydrology to hydric soils adjacent to
Neighbors Branch.
Riparian Wetland
---
1.62
1.62
Enhancement
2:1
0.81
Plant native vegetation on impacted wetlands and
fence cattle.
Riparian Wetland
---
1.29
1.29
Preservation
5:1
0.26
---
Length and Area Summations
Restoration Level
Stream (linear footage)
Riparian
Wetland (acreage)
Nonriparian Wetland
Buffer (square feet) Upland (acres)
(acreage)
Riverine
Non-Riverine
Restoration
2,456
0.52
--
Enhancement (Level 1)
202
1.62
--
Enhancement (Level II)
1,863
--
--
Preservation
3,139
1.29
--
Totals
7,660
3.43
--
Mitigation Units
3,964 SMUs
1.59 Riparian
0.00 Nonriparian
WMUs
WMUs
BMP Elements
Element
Location
Purpose/Function
Notes
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Monitoring Year 2 or 5 (2017)
DMS Project No. 92872 December 2017
McDowell County, NC Appendices

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site / DMS Number 92872
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion
or Delivery
Project Institution
5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 100
Mitigation Plan
April 2009
March 7, 2013
Permits Issued
Construction Plans and Sediment and
Florence & Hutcheson Engineering
Final Design — Construction Plans
(Now HDR)
April 2014
Construction
--
December 2015
Temporary S&E Mix applied to Entire Project Site
--
December 2015
Permanent Seed Mix applied to the Entire Project Site
--
December 2015
Bare Root; Containerized; and B&B Plantings for the Entire
Project Site
December 2015
Baseline Monitoring Document (Year 0 Monitoring Baseline)
April 2016
July 2016
Repair
--
October 2016
Year 1 Monitoring
November 2016
January 2017
Year 2 Monitoring
November 2017
December 2017
Year 2 Vegetation Monitoring
August 30, 2017
Elisabeth Turner [phone]
Year 2 Geomorphology Monitoring
February 22, 2017
Year 3 Monitoring
Raleigh, NC 27603
Year 4 Monitoring
Grant Lewis [phone]
Year 5 Monitoring
Table 3. Project Contact Table
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site / DMS Number 92872
Designer
Florence & Hutcheson Engineering
(Now HDR)
5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
Kevin Williams [phone]
Construction Plans and Sediment and
Florence & Hutcheson Engineering
Erosion Control Plans
(Now HDR)
5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
Kevin Williams [phone]
Construction Contractor
Carolina Environmental Contracting, Inc.
Mount Airy, NC
[phone]
Planting Contractor
Keller Environmental
7291 Haymarket Lane
Raleigh, NC 27615
Jay Keller [phone]
As -built Surveyor
Turner Land Surveying. PLLC
3719 Benson Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
Elisabeth Turner [phone]
Baseline Data Collection
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Grant Lewis [phone]
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Monitoring Year 2 or 5 (2017)
DMS Project No. 92872 December 2017
McDowell County, NC Appendices

Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawlev Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site / DMS Number 92872
Project Information
Project name Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Mitigation Site
Project county McDowell County, North Carolina
Project area (Acres) 33.4
Project coordinates (lat/long) 35.6599°N, 81.9002°W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic region Blue Ridge
Project river basin Catawba River Basin
USGS hydrologic unit (8 digit) 03050101
NCDWQ Sub -basin 03-08-30
Project drainage area (acres) 678
% Drainage area impervious < 1%
CGIA land use classification ----
Reach
Summary Information
Parameters
Walton
UTs to Walton Crawley
UTs to Neighbors
Neighbors
Crawley
Branch
Branch
Branch
Branch
UT 1
UT 2
UT 1
UT 3
Length of reach (linear feet)
2529
1001
802
2339
281
875
Valley classification
VIII
11
11
VIII
11
11
Drainage area (acres)
458
29
20
220
13
15
NCDWQ stream identification
18.5
25
25
33.5
23.5
16.5
score
NCDWQ water quality
C
C
C
C
C
C
classification
Morphological description
B4/5c-G4/5
E5
E5 -G5
E5/4 -G5/4
E5/4
E5
(stream type)
Design Rosgen stream type
C4
E/C5
E/C5
C4
E5/4
E5
Evolutionary trend
Design approach (P 1, P2, P3, E,
PI, EI, EII,
PI, EI, Ell,
PI, Ell, & P
PI &EII
EI &EII
P
etc.)
& P
& P
Elsinboro,
Evard,
Hayesville,
Underlying mapped soils
Evard,
Evard
Evard
Hayesville
Hayesville
Iotla
Hayesville
Well / SW
Drainage class
Well
Well
Well
Well
Well
Poorly
Nonhydric /Nonhydric
Soil hydric status
Nonhydric
Nonhydric
Nonhydric
Nonhydric
Hydric
Slope
0.0340
0.0380
0.0545
0.0260
0.0820
0.0656
Not
Not
Not
Not
FEMA classification
Not Mapped
Not Mapped
Mapped
Mapped
Mapped
Mapped
Forest /
Forest /
Native vegetation community
Forest
Forest
Forest
Forest
Pasture
Pasture
% Composition of exotic invasive
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
spp.
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Monitoring Year 2 or 5 (2017)
DMS Project No. 92872 December 2017
McDowell County, NC Appendices

Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Monitoring Year 2 or 5 (2017)
DMS Project No. 92872 December 2017
McDowell County, NC Appendices
Wetland Summary Information
Walton
UTs to Walton Crawley
UTs to Neighbors
Neighbors
Parameters
Crawley
Branch
Branch
Branch
Branch
UT 1
UT 2
UT 1
UT 3
Size of wetland (acres)
0.95
0.37
N/A
1.88
0.23
N/A
Riparian
Riparian
Riparian
Riparian
Wetland type
N/A
N/A
Riverine
Riverine
Riverine
Riverine
Mapped soil series
Wehadkee
Wehadkee
N/A
Wehadkee
Wehadkee
N/A
Drainage class
poorly
poorly
N/A
poorly
poorly
N/A
Soil hydric status
hydric
hydric
N/A
hydric
hydric
N/A
Overbank
Overbank
Overbank
Overbank
Source of hydrology
N/A
N/A
and springs
and springs
and springs
and springs
Drained/
Hydrologic impairment
Cleared
Invasives
N/A
Cleared/
Invasives
N/A
Invasives
Forest /
Forest /
Native vegetation community
Forest
N/A
Forest
N/A
Pasture
Pasture
% Composition of exotic invasive
<5
<5
N/A
<5
<5
N/A
spp.
Reg latory Considerations
Supporting
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved?
Documentation
Waters of the US — Section 404
Yes
Yes
SAW -2009-917
Waters of the US — Section 401
Yes
Yes
SAW -2009-917
No Effect —
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
CE Document
Historic Preservation Act
Yes
Yes
CE Document
Coastal Zone Management Act
No
NA
NA
(CZMA/CAMA)
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
No
NA
NA
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
NA
NA
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Monitoring Year 2 or 5 (2017)
DMS Project No. 92872 December 2017
McDowell County, NC Appendices

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Figures 2, 2A-213. Current Conditions Plan View
Figures 3, 3A-313. Project Assets
Tables 5A -5E. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Stream Fixed Station Photo Points
Vegetation Plot Photos
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Monitoring Year 2 or 5 (2017)
DMS Project No. 92872 December 2017
McDowell County, NC Appendices

. . . . . . . . . . .
X
N40..
a
Ax Om EnvKon+nenial, Inc.
Prepared for:
'R
NC Department of
4 ;
Environmental
Quality
Division of
Mitigation
Services
Project:
Neighbors Branch/
Walton Crawley
Branch Stream
and Wetland
Restoration Site
DMS Project
# 92872
McDowell County, NC
Title:
Current Conditions
Plan View
FIX;I Drawn by:
KRJ
Date:
NOV 2017
Scale:
-"Al 1:5500
Project No.:
12-004.21
Legend FIGURE
Conservation Easement Boundary
.4
Streams
4",
1,000 2,000
Feet

Aim
;r �~ z
J.
y'e's" .P' { ~ /- �• .y
L"
lqI
7 3.3
34 K
8 40 -!4�
41 _ • ,�� � � � 2 y
z: -tea
A
s � ,• is •'i«
or-
- 0 250
s '3%
•
Axiom Enwnrinienial. Inc.
r. 4!*
Prepared for:
`' `�.^-• " NC Department of
Environmental
t4-^ Quality
' 'FYI ` — s . -'•�rw .���•
:. �c't• Division of
Y t
Mitigation
Services
•'~L7E " }. ,. ,S" Project:
` * Neighbors Branch/
Walton Crawley
Branch Stream
and Wetland
Restoration Site
�- DMS Project
# 92872
f� :ti iw
McDowell County, NC
Title:
.'... `, Current Conditions
Plan View
Legend
Conservation Easement Boundary
Streams
Structures
Wetland Enhancement - 1.32 ac
Stream Monitoring Reach
Cross -Sections
`{ Photo Point Locations
• Crest Gauge
= CVS Plots Meeting Success Criteria During MY2 (2017)
500 1,000
Feet
Drawn by:
KRJ
Date:
NOV 2017
Scale:
i
1:2400
Project No.:
12-004.21
FIGURE
2B

�'.a
a
Axiom ffnwitVnimnial, Inc.
.+�
Prepared for:
R
NC Department of
Environmental
I
Quality
Division of
Mitigation
-"
Services
Project:
Neighbors Branch/
-. . °'
Walton Crawley
Branch Stream
and Wetland
Restoration Site
DMS Project
# 92872
McDowell County, NC
Title:
�d
Project Assets
Drawn by:
Legend
KRJ
Date:
JUL 2016
r
.. Conservation Easement Boundary
Stream Restoration
Scale:
1:5500
Stream Enhancement (level 1)
Project No.:
Stream Enhancement (level 11)
12-004.21
Stream Preservation
Wetland Restoration -0.52 ac
FIGURE
Wetland Enhancement - 1.62 ac
Wetland Preservation - 1.29 ac
how&
0 500 1,000 2,000
Feet

•' '�'� '-e..-
y �• � r r
-, k - ��' • ?.r. ,OM1 r � �."'R+''`7y,„� '�,i
I.:� s� y
09+67 = Start of Neighbors
Branch preservation reach
11+72 = Start of UT -3
preservation reach
Easement breaks (Neighbors Branch
sta 14+63 and sta 24+98) have been
removed from credit summation.
MR
ta�cr
DMS Project
otsQ'
Aram
Enwironimnial, Inc.
# 92872
•`ti
Prepared for:
NC Department of
"'
..
Environmental
�...
�`.Ys
McDowell County, NC
Quality
R rr
` Ilk
b''
T.�
Division of
+
Mitigation
Services
., ; ` �•.
Project:
Neighbors Branch/
' Walton Crawley
�'. Branch Stream
and Wetland
r7- , It Restoration Site
ta�cr
DMS Project
otsQ'
# 92872
e`gra
McDowell County, NC
Title:
R rr
G�
T.�
Project Assets
�"�
.. �,►•
:.:
Drawn by:
Legend
KRJ
G
v.�
Conservation Easement Boundary
Date:
JUL 2016
Stream Restoration
Scale:
• -
`
Stream Enhancement (level 1)
Stream Enhancement 11)
1:2400
q
(level
Project No.:
Stream Preservation
12-004.21
Stationing
Wetland Restoration - 0.52 ac
FIGURE
Wetland Enhancement - 0.30 ac
'
Wetland Preservation - 1.29 ac
3Ay
0
500
1,000
,�
Feet

� *N
»2/\,4

Table 5A Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Walton Crawley Branch
Assessed Length 1450
Adjusted %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Sub-Cateciory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Foota a
as Intended
Ve etation
Ve etationVe
etation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
26
26
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth :Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
25
25
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
25
25
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
25
25
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
25
25
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
0
0
100%
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
24
24
°
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
24
24
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
24
24
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
24
24
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
24
24
100%

Table 5B Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID UT1 to Walton Crawley Branch
Assessed Length 518
Adjusted %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Sub-Cateciory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Foota a
as Intended
Ve etation
Ve etationVe
etation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
8
8
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth :Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
7
7
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
7
7
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
7
7
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
7
7
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
0
0
100%
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
10
10
°
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
10
10
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
10
10
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
10
10
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
10
10
100%

Table 5C Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID UT2 to Walton Crawley Branch
Assessed Length 802
Adjusted %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Sub-Cateciory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Foota a
as Intended
Ve etation
Ve etationVe
etation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
12
12
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth :Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
11
11
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
11
11
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
11
11
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
11
11
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
0
0
100%
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
12
12
°
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
12
12
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
12
12
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
12
12
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
12
12
100%

Table 5D Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Neighbors Branch
Assessed Length 1470
Adjusted %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Sub-Cateciory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Foota a
as Intended
Ve etation
Ve etationVe
etation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
22
22
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth :Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
21
21
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
21
21
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
21
21
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
21
21
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
0
0
100%
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
16
16
°
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
16
16
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
16
16
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
16
16
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
16
16
100%

Table 5E Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID UT1 to Neighbors Branch
Assessed Length 281
Adjusted %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Sub-Cateciory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Foota a
as Intended
Ve etation
Ve etationVe
etation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
20
20
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth :Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
19
19
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
19
19
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
19
19
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
19
19
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
0
0
100%
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
20
20
°
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
20
20
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
20
20
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
20
20
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
20
20
100%

Table 6 Veqetation Condition Assessment
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Mitigation Project
Planted Acreage 11.78
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
CCPV
De fiction
Number of
Pol ons
Combined
Acrea a
% of
Planted
Acrea e
1. Bare Areas
None
0.1 acres
none
0
0.00
0.0%
2. Low Stem Density Areas
None
0.1 acres
none
0
0.00
0.0%
2B. Low Planted Stem Density Areas
None
0.1 acres
none
0
0.00
0.0%
Total
0
0.00
0.0%
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
None
0.25 acres
N/A
0
0.00
0.0%
Cumulative Total
0
0.00
0.0%
Easement Acreage 33.4
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
ThresholdDe
CCPV
fiction
Number of
Pol ons
Combined
Acrea a
% of
Easement
Acrea e
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
None
1000 SF
none
0
0.00
0.0%
5. Easement Encroachment Areas'
None
none
none
0
0.00
0.0%
1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory, the channel acreage,
crossings or any other elements not directly planted as part of the project effort.
2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries.
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table and is the result of
encroachment, the associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5.
4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern/interest are listed below. The list of high concern spcies are
those with the potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short-term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure for existing, more established tree/shrub stands over timeframes
that are slightly longer (e.g. 1-2 decades). The low/moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can
be mapped, if in the judgement of the observer their coverage, density or distribution is suppressing the viability, density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the
integration of risk factors by DMS such as species present, their coverage, distribution relative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the
projects history will warrant control, but potentially large coverages of Microstegium in the herb layer will not likley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree/shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the
potential impacts of treating extensive amounts of ground cover. Those species with the "watch list" designator in gray shade are of interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any frequency. Those in red italics
are of particular interest given their extreme risk/threat level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are found, particularly ealry in a projects monitoring history. However, areas of discreet, dense patches will of course be
mapped as polygons. The symbology scheme below was one that was found to be helpful for symbolzing invasives polygons, particulalry for situations where the conditon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and
dense, discreet patches. In any case, the point or polygon/area feature can be symbolized to describe things like high or low concern and species can be listed as a map inset, in legend items if the number of species are limited or in the
narrative section of the executive summary.

Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch
Fixed Station Photographs
August 2017
Photo Point 3 — UT -1
to Neighbors Branch
-. -
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Monitoring Year 2 or 5 (2017)
DMS Project No. 92872 December 2017
McDowell County, NC Appendices

Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch
Fixed Station Photographs
August 2017
(continued)
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Monitoring Year 2 or 5 (2017)
DMS Project No. 92872 December 2017
McDowell County, NC Appendices

Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch
Fixed Station Photographs
August 2017
(continued)
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Monitoring Year 2 or 5 (2017)
DMS Project No. 92872 December 2017
McDowell County, NC Appendices

Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch
Fixed Station Photographs
August 2017
(continued)
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Monitoring Year 2 or 5 (2017)
DMS Project No. 92872 December 2017
McDowell County, NC Appendices

Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch
Fixed Station Photographs
August 2017
(continued)
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Monitoring Year 2 or 5 (2017)
DMS Project No. 92872 December 2017
McDowell County, NC Appendices

Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch
Fixed Station Photographs
August 2017
(continued)
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Monitoring Year 2 or 5 (2017)
DMS Project No. 92872 December 2017
McDowell County, NC Appendices

Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Baseline Fixed Station Photographs
Taken August 2017
(continued)
Photo Point 37 — UT -1 to
Walton Crawley Branch
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch
DMS Project No. 92872
McDowell County, NC
Photo Point 42 - Walton
Crawley Branch
;•� yam, .tis` * � ;
Monitoring Year 2 or 5 (2017)
December 2017
Appendices

Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch
Fixed Station Photographs
August 2017
(continued)
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Monitoring Year 2 or 5 (2017)
DMS Project No. 92872 December 2017
McDowell County, NC Appendices

Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch
Vegetation Monitoring Photographs Taken August 2017
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch
DMS Project No. 92872
McDowell County, NC
Monitoring Year 2 or 5 (2017)
December 2017
Appendices

Appendix C.
Vegetation Data
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Success Summary
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 9. Total Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Monitoring Year 2 or 5 (2017)
DMS Project No. 92872 December 2017
McDowell County, NC Appendices

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Success Summary
Vegetation Plot ID Vegetation Survival Threshold Met?
Tract Mean
1 Yes
100%
2 Yes
3 Yes
4 Yes
5 Yes
6 Yes
7 Yes
8 Yes
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Report Prepared By
Phillip Perkinson
Date Prepared
9/1/2017 11:09
database name
Axiom-NeighborsWaltonCrawleyBranch-2017-A-v2.3.l.mdb
database location
S:\Business\Projects\12\12-004 EEP Monitoring\12-004.21 Neighbors
Bob\Neighbors Branch and Walton Crawley Branch\2017 MY-02\CVS
computer name
PHILLIP-PC
file size
58728448
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT ------------
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s)
and project data.
Pro', planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This
excludes live stakes.
Pro', total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes
live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems,
missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor bSpp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of
total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and
SPP
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot;
dead and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and
SPI)
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural
volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY -------------------------------- -----
Pro'ect Code 92872
project Name Neighbors Branch/ Walton Crawley Branch
River Basin Catawba
length(ft)
stream -to -edge width (ft)
Required Plots
(calculated)
Sampled Plots 8
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Monitoring Year 2 or 5 (2017)
DMS Project No. 92872 December 2017
McDowell County, NC Appendices

Table 9. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
DMS Project Code 92872. Project Name: Neighbors Branch/ Walton Crawley Branct
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Pnol-S = Planted excluding livestakes
P -all = Planting including livestakes
T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits
Current Plot Data (MY2 2017)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
92872-01-0001
PnoLS P -all T
92872-01-0002
PnoLS P -all T
92872-01-0003
PnoLS P -all T
92872-01-0004
PnoLS P -all T
92872-01-0005
PnoLS P -all T
92872-01-0006
PnoLS P -all T
92872-01-0007
PnoLS P -all T
92872-01-0008
PnoLS P -all T
MY2(2017)
PnoLS P -all T
MY1(2016)
PnoLS P -all T
MYO(2016)
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
3 3
3
1
1
1
5 5
5
1 1
1
10
10
10
11 11
11
6
6
17
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1 1
1
4
4
4
4 4
4
2
2
2
1
1
1
12
12
12
15 15
15
16
16
16
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
1 1
1
1
1
1
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
1 1
1
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
5
8
1 1
1
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
41
4
4
11 1
1
6 61
6
51 5
51
21
2
2
1
1
1
19
19
191
24 24
24
31
311
31
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
6
1 1
1
11
1
8
3
Nyssa
tupelo
Tree
1 1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
1 1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
3 3
3
6
6
6
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
8 8
26
6 6
22
4
4
4
1
4
4
4
2
2
2
24
24
59
28 28
81
29
29
29
Quercus
oak
Tree
I
1
1 1
1
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
1 1
1
4 41
4
1
1
1
6
6
61
21 2
21
4
41
4
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1 1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
51
5
5
12 12
12
12
12
12
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
1 1
1
1
1
1
Salix nigra
black willow
ITree
6
6
3
10
Sambucus canadensis
ICommon Elderberry
IShrub
2
2
4
Stem count 12 12
size (ares)l 1
size (ACRES) 0.02
Species coun 3 3
Stems per ACRE 485.6 485.6
31
4
1255
8 8
1
0.02
3 3
323.7 323.7
32
5
1295
14
5
566.6
141 14 12 121 19 101 101 10
1 1 1
0.02 0.02 0.02
5 5 5 5 7 5 5 5
566.6 566.6 485.6 485.6 768.9 404.7 404.7 404.7
9 9 12 121 2 12 10 10 10 87 871 140
1 1 1 8
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.20
2 2 3 6 6 6 6 6 6 11 11 13
364.2 364.2 485.6 485.6 485.6 485.6 404.7 404.7 404.7 440.1 440.1 708.2
100 100 159
8
0.20
12 12 14
505.9 505.9 804.3
1071
10
541.3
107 132
8
0.20
10 12
541.3 667.7
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Pnol-S = Planted excluding livestakes
P -all = Planting including livestakes
T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits

Appendix D.
Stream Measurements and Geomorphology Data
Cross Section Plots
Longitudinal Profile Plots
Substrate Plots
Tables 1OA- 1OB. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Tables 11A -11D. Monitoring Data -Dimensional Data Summary
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Monitoring Year 2 or 5 (2017)
DMS Project No. 92872 December 2017
McDowell County, NC Appendices

Site
Neighbors Br./Walton Crawley Br.
Project Number:
92872
XS ID
XS - 1, Riffle
Reach
Neighbors Branch
Date:
2/22/2017
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Keith
Station
Elevation
0.00
1199.98
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
2.46
1199.99
11.9
3.93
1199.66
Flood Prone Width:
5.17
1199.44
5.94
1199.24
6.43
1198.73
14.9
7.20
1198.59
7.89
1198.40
8.50
1198.19
9.11
1198.33
1.
9.64
1198.42
10.47
1198.72
10.78
1199.17
11.35
1199.31
12.47
1199.73
14.4
1200.00
17.2
1200.10
• Bankfull
1198
• Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/11/16
MY -01 8/23/16
1197
---a- MY -02 2/22/17
0 10
20
Station (feet)
SUMMARY DATA
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch - NCDMS Project Number 92872
Bankfull Elevation:
1200.0
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
9.5
Bankfull Width:
11.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
1201.8
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.8
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.8
W / D Ratio:
14.9
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
8.4
1.0
Stream Typ E
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch - NCDMS Project Number 92872
Stream Reach Neighbors Creek
XS -1, Station 14+39, Riffle
1202
-----------------------------------------------------------
1201
m
1200
1.
0
1199
W
• Bankfull
1198
• Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/11/16
MY -01 8/23/16
1197
---a- MY -02 2/22/17
0 10
20
Station (feet)

Site
Elevation
Neighbors Br./Walton Crawley Br.
1200.7
Project Number:
92872
4.7
XS ID
Date:
XS - 2, Pool
Field Crew:
Reach
7.9
Neighbors
1
1198.0
9.2
1197.9
10.1
1197.7
10.8
1197.4
11.7
1197.3
12.1
1197.4
0" �. ;.
1200.2
15.3
1200.3
16.9
1200.5
17.9
1200.9
19.9
1201.1
�.
-4 r .
'..
�*
y XS 2 Looking Upstream
Stream Type E
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch - NCDMS Project Number 92872
Stream Reach Neighbors Creek
XS - 2 Station 13+89 Pool
1203
1202
1201
01200
W 1199
1198
1197
0
10 20
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
0.0
1200.7
2.9
1200.5
4.7
Branch
Date:
2/22/2017
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Keith
Station
Elevation
0.0
1200.7
2.9
1200.5
4.7
1200.4
6.1
1200.0
7.2
1199.7
7.9
1199.3
8.1
1198.0
9.2
1197.9
10.1
1197.7
10.8
1197.4
11.7
1197.3
12.1
1197.4
13.4
1200.2
15.3
1200.3
16.9
1200.5
17.9
1200.9
19.9
1201.1
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
1200.3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
14.0
Bankfull Width:
9.7
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
NA
Flood Prone Width:
NA
Max Depth at Bankfull:
3.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.4
W / D Ratio:
NA
Entrenchment Ratio:
NA
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
---------------------------------------------------
• Bankfull
Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/11/16
-MY-018/23/16
� MY -02 2/22/17

Site
Neighbors Br./Walton Crawley Br.
Project Number:
92872
XS ID
XS - 3, Riffle
Reach
Neighbors Branch
Date:
2/22/2017
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Keith
Station
Elevation
0.00
1205.85
8.1
2.84
1205.80
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
4.47
1205.44
100.0
5.49
1205.02
1.6
6.92
1204.53
0.9
7.67
1204.40
9.8
8.68
1203.78
11.2
9.82
1203.59
1.0
10.44
1203.50
AL1
11.25
1203.65
1204
11.84
1203.81
MY -00 4/11/16
12.35
1204.17
13.56
1204.65
14.36
1205.15
--E-- MY -02 2/22/17
15.62
1205.48
1203
17.6
1205.29
19.3
1205.16
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
1205.1
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
8.1
Bankfull Width:
8.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
1206.7
Flood Prone Width:
t
100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.9
W / D Ratio:
9.8
Entrenchment Ratio:
11.2
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch - NCDMS Project Number 92872
Stream Reach Neighbors Creek
XS - 3, Station 11+70, Riffle
1207
1206
m
----------------- ----------------------------- ---am ------- ----
.1205
ti
AL1
� � � • Bankfull
1204
Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/11/16
MY -01 8/23/16
--E-- MY -02 2/22/17
1203
0 10 20
Station (feet)

Site
Neighbors Br./Walton Crawley Br.
Project Number:
92872
XS ID
XS - 4, Riffle
Reach
Walton Crawley Branch
Date:
2/22/2017
Field Crew:
EL Perkinson, Keith
Station
Elevation
-0.10
1167.11
7.9
3.30
1166.96
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
5.21
1166.73
100.0
6.22
1166.74
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
6.83
1166.70
9.4
7.80
1166.10
Bank Height Ratio:
8.33
1165.80
9.14
1165.39
9.65
1165.07
10.80
1165.02
12.35
1164.92
13.23
1164.92
14.81
1164.79
15.88
1164.63
16.63
1164.67
17.4
1164.74
18.3
1166.00
19.5
1166.48
20.7
1167.10
21.6
1167.23
23.4
1167.16
25.7
1167.10
27.5
1167.11
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
1166.7
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:EW,
7.9
Bankfull Width:
3.0
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
68
Flood Prone Width: M
100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:2.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.4
W / D Ratio:
9.4
Entrenchment Ratio:
7.7
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch - NCDMS Project Number 92872
Stream Reach Walton Crawley Property
XS - 4, Station 19+17, Riffle
1169
1168
d
1167
0
1166
W
1165
1164
0 10 20 30
Station (feet)
_______________________________________________________________
__________ ____________________________ _________________
Bankfull•Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/11/16
MY -0
1 8/23/16
� MY -02 2/22/17

Site
Neighbors Br./Walton Crawley Br.
Project Number:
92872
XS ID
XS - 5, Pool
Reach
Walton Crawley Branch
Date:
2/22/2017
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Keith
Station
Elevation
0.0
1168.7
3.1
1168.7
4.8
1168.4
7.8
1167.7
8.4
1164.5
9.8
1164.5
11.1
1164.4
11.9
1164.0
13.4
1163.6
14.8
1164.0
15.9
1164.3
16.9
1164.7
19.6
1167.7
20.8
1168.0
25.5
1167.8
28.6
1167.9
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
1167.7
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
35.1
Bankfull Width:
11.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:NA
Flood Prone Width:
NA
Max Depth at Bankfull:
4.1
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.9
W / D Ratio:
NA
Entrenchment Ratio:
NA
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Stream Type E
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch - NCDMS Project Number 92872
Stream Reach Neighbors Creek
1170 XS - 5, Station 17+69, Pool
1168
m
-----------
`.tl 167
0
X1166
v
W1165
1164
1163 +
0
10
Station (feet)
• Bankfull
• Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/11/16
MY -01 8/23/16
MY -02 2/22/17
20 30

Site
Neighbors Br./Walton Crawley Br.
Project Number:
92872
XS ID
XS - 6, Riffle
Reach
Walton Crawley Branch
Date:
2/22/2017
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Keith
Station
Elevation
0.00
1170.77
20.2
2.98
1170.48
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
7.13
1170.28
100.0
9.14
1170.30
2.0
10.62
1169.52
11.69
1168.62
10.0
12.75
1168.09
Bank Height Ratio:
13.99
1168.14
14.66
1168.21
15.77
1168.21
17.00
1168.28
18.38
1168.10
19.23
1168.10
19.95
1168.23
21.17
1168.00
21.6
1168.83
22.6
1169.33
23.7
1169.87
24.3
1170.18
26.3
1170.16
29.3
1170.03
32.9
1170.11
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
1170.0
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
20.2
Bankfull Width:
14.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
1172.0
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.4
W / D Ratio:
10.0
Entrenchment Ratio:
7.0
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
1173
1172
1168
1167
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch - NCDMS Project Number 92872
Stream Reach Walton Crawley Property
XS - 6, Station 16+19, Riffle
10
20
Station (feet)
30
. Bankfull
• Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/11/16
MY -01 8/23/16
MY -02 2/22/17
40

Site
Elevation
Neighbors Br./Walton Crawley Br.
w
f
Project Number:
92872
Branch
Date:
XS ID
Field Crew:
XS - 7, Pool
10.1
1171.7
Reach
1171.5
Walton Crawley
1171.5
14.1
1171.2
15.0
1171.0
16.2
1171.2
17.6
1171.2
18.6
1171.1
20.0
1171.1
21.0
1174.4
24.8
1175.3
29.0
1175.4
XS 7 Looking Upstream
y..
Stream Type
E
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch - NCDMS Project Number 92872
Stream Reach Neighbors Creek
XS - 7 Station 12+69 Pool
1176
1175
1174
m
01173
W 1172
1171
1170
0
10 20
30
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
0.0
1175.3
3.4
1175.1
6.1
Branch
Date:
2/22/2017
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Keith
Station
Elevation
0.0
1175.3
3.4
1175.1
6.1
1174.8
8.6
1174.2
9.2
1171.9
10.1
1171.7
10.9
1171.5
12.1
1171.5
14.1
1171.2
15.0
1171.0
16.2
1171.2
17.6
1171.2
18.6
1171.1
20.0
1171.1
21.0
1174.4
24.8
1175.3
29.0
1175.4
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
1174.3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
34.1
Bankfull Width:
12.6
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
NA
Flood Prone Width:
NA
Max Depth at Bankfull:
3.3
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.7
W / D Ratio21 :
NA
Entrenchment Ratio:
NA
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
• Bankfull•Flood Prone Area
MY -004/11/16
MY -018/23/16
� MY -02 2/22/17

Site
Neighbors Br./Walton Crawley Br.
Project Number:
92872
XS ID
XS - 8, Riffle
Reach
Walton Crawley Branch
Date:
2/22/2017
Field Crew:
EL Perkinson, Keith
Station
Elevation
0.00
1179.27
4.85
1179.20
7.14
1179.18
9.24
1178.31
10.44
1177.84
11.32
1177.77
12.16
1177.35
13.04
1177.34
14.44
1177.07
15.54
1177.22
17.23
1177.21
18.27
1177.20
19.54
1177.19
20.26
1177.18
21.68
1177.25
22.3
1177.50
23.2
1177.78
24.5
1179.14
25.1
1179.38
27.0
1179.47
30.0
1179.43
32.4
1179.48
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation: AN
1179.2
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:27.0
Bankfull Width:
17.4
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
1181.3
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.1
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.6
W / D Ratio:
11.2
Entrenchment Ratio:
5.7
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch - NCDMS Project Number 92872
Stream Reach Walton Crawley Property
XS - 8, Station 11+23, Riffle
1182
----------------------------------------------------------------
1181
--1180
1179
ti
W
Station (feet)
. Bankfull
•Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/11/16
1177
-MY-018/23/16
--a-- MY -02 2/22/17
1176
0 10 20 30

v
v
c
0
t Name
e
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch - Profile
Walton Crawley Branch, Station 10+00 - 22+00
Profile
2/22/17
Perkinson, Keith
2016
2017
2018
2019
Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.0145
2016
0.0146
2016
Riffle Length
24
2017
25
Year 0 Monitoring \Survey
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.0032
Year 1 Monitoring \Survey
0.0030
Year 2 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Station
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevation
2147.7
1163.1
1163.3
2147.7
1163.1
1163.4
2146.6
1163.2
1163.3
2136.7
1162.8
1163.4
2127.6
1163.2
1163.6
2135.8
1162.8
1163.3
2132.5
1162.2
1163.3
2123.9
1162.7
1163.6
2132.9
1162.6
1163.2
2128.3
1162.5
1163.3
2121.6
1163.4
1163.7
2127.3
1162.7
1163.3
2122.8
1162.4
1163.5
2114.1
1163.3
1163.9
2125.3
1163.1
1163.5
2119.2
1163.5
1163.7
2109.9
1163.0
1163.9
2122.6
1162.7
1163.5
2115.3
1162.8
1163.7
2101.0
1162.9
1163.9
2120.6
1162.8
1163.6
2104.0
1162.9
1163.8
2094.9
1162.8
1163.8
2119.4
1163.6
1163.7
2091.7
1162.9
1163.8
2088.3
1163.7
1164.1
2111.5
1163.4
1163.8
2085.1
1163.6
1163.9
2060.8
1163.9
1164.4
2103.9
1162.9
1163.7
2057.2
1163.7
1164.3
2048.0
1164.0
1164.4
2092.7
1162.7
1163.8
2031.9
1164.0
1164.5
2015.6
1164.3
1164.8
2085.5
1163.7
1163.9
2026.5
1163.7
1164.6
2007.5
1163.1
1164.8
2058.9
1164.0
1164.3
2007.1
1163.0
1164.6
1999.5
1163.1
1164.8
2037.4
1164.1
1164.5
1997.2
1162.7
1164.6
1993.9
1164.5
1165.0
2013.4
1164.3
1164.7
1991.6
1164.6
1165.0
1986.7
1164.2
1165.0
2005.8
1163.1
1164.7
1981.9
1164.0
1164.9
1972.6
1164.1
1165.0
1996.8
1163.2
1164.7
1969.8
1164.1
1164.9
1954.3
1163.7
1165.1
1991.4
1164.7
1164.9
1966.1
1164.3
1164.9
1953.1
1165.4
1165.6
1983.0
1164.1
1164.9
1961.1
1164.0
1165.0
1916.9
1165.1
1165.6
1969.1
1164.2
1165.0
1957.7
1164.1
1164.9
1903.5
1164.9
1165.6
1965.6
1164.6
1164.9
1951.6
1163.6
1165.0
1895.6
1164.5
1165.6
1960.0
1164.2
1164.9
1950.3
1165.3
1165.4
1881.5
1164.5
1165.6
1951.5
1163.8
1164.9
1916.9
1164.9
1165.5
1870.0
1164.6
1165.6
1950.2
1165.4
1165.5
1892.2
1164.8
1165.5
1864.9
1165.4
1165.8
1901.2
1164.9
1165.5
1886.9
1164.5
1165.5
1856.2
1165.5
1165.9
1893.4
1164.5
1165.5
1875.7
1164.2
1165.5
1851.4
1165.2
1165.9
1881.7
1164.5
1165.5
1164.4_
---U65.5
1185
1180
1175
1165
1160
1000
2018I 2019
Year 3 Monitoring \Survey Year 4 Monitoring \Survey
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Walton Crawley Branch Year 2 (2017) Profile - Station 10+00 to 22+00
1200
1400
Year 0 (2016) Bed (Year 1(2016) Bed -*-Year 2 (2017) Bed
1600
Distance (feet)
-X-Year 2 (2017) Water Surface
1800
x TOB
2000
0 Engineered Structure
2200
2016
2016
2017
2018
2019
Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.0145
0.0143
0.0146
Riffle Length
24
24
25
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.0032
0.0055
0.0030
Pool Length
25
23
22
Pool to Pool Spacing
43
42
41
1200
1400
Year 0 (2016) Bed (Year 1(2016) Bed -*-Year 2 (2017) Bed
1600
Distance (feet)
-X-Year 2 (2017) Water Surface
1800
x TOB
2000
0 Engineered Structure
2200

t Name
e
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch - Profile
Neighbors Branch, Station 10+00 - 16+00
Profile
2/22/17
Perkinson, Keith
2016
2017
2018
2019
Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.0222
2016
0.0221
2016
Riffle Length
28
2017
31
Year 0 Monitoring \Survey
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.0043
Year 1 Monitoring \Survey
0.0041
Year 2 Monitoring \Survey
Pool Length
Station
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Station
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Station
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
1541.4
1196.4
1196.4
1541.4
1196.4
1196.4
1535.4
1197.0
1196.9
1536.2
1194.9
1196.4
1537.7
1194.8
1196.4
1524.5
1196.2
1196.9
1534.4
1196.7
1196.9
1534.6
1196.8
1196.9
1516.8
1195.5
1196.9
1526.1
1196.4
1196.9
1527.5
1196.5
1196.9
1510.4
1196.2
1196.9
1519.8
1195.5
1196.9
1521.1
1195.9
1196.9
1508.3
1198.2
1198.2
1515.2
1195.4
1196.9
1510.1
1195.9
1197.0
1478.7
1197.9
1198.3
1508.9
1196.2
1197.0
1507.9
1198.1
1198.3
1473.5
1197.6
1198.3
1506.7
1198.0
1198.2
1488.4
1198.2
1198.3
1465.3
1197.4
1198.4
1475.6
1198.0
1198.3
1475.6
1197.9
1198.3
1460.7
1197.0
1198.3
1473.9
1197.5
1198.3
1470.3
1197.8
1198.3
1458.8
1198.9
1198.9
1467.1
1197.5
1198.3
1460.0
1196.9
1198.3
1439.4
1198.5
1198.9
1459.3
1196.8
1198.4
1458.2
1198.8
1199.0
1421.4
1198.7
1199.0
1457.8
1198.8
1198.9
1434.3
1198.4
1199.0
1408.3
1198.6
1199.0
1439.1
1198.5
1199.0
1429.2
1198.5
1199.0
1392.8
1198.6
1199.0
1421.5
1198.5
1199.0
1399.7
1198.5
1199.1
1389.8
1197.8
1199.0
1410.0
1198.7
1199.0
1395.0
1198.2
1199.1
1386.0
1197.5
1199.0
1393.1
1198.4
1199.1
1390.1
1197.8
1199.1
1384.4
1199.6
1199.7
1388.5
1197.7
1199.0
1386.0
1197.4
1199.1
1367.0
1199.4
1199.7
1384.7
1197.4
1199.0
1384.5
1199.7
1199.7
1352.5
1199.8
1199.9
1383.2
1199.5
1199.7
1369.3
1199.2
1199.8
1348.0
1199.4
1199.9
1364.9
1199.3
1199.8
1353.1
1199.7
1199.9
1339.4
1199.4
1200.1
1357.6
1199.5
1199.9
1346.9
1199.2
1200.0
1338.2
1200.6
1200.7
1353.4
1199.0
1199.9
1339.7
1199.7
1200.2
1327.7
1200.3
1200.6
1344.8
1199.2
1199.9
1338.2
1200.6
1200.7
1323.7
1198.8
1200.6
1337.5
1199.3
1200.3
1330.0
1200.2
1200.7
1320.3
1198.7
1200.7
1336.4
1200.5
1200.7
1326.7
1199.4
1200.8
1316.8
1201.5
1201.5
1324.7
1200.1
1200.7
1320.8
1198.6
1200.7
1293.6
1201.4
1201.6
141R9
12014
1201.9
1210
1208
1206
m`
1204
A
0
z 1202
C
0
M
2 1200
W
1198
1196
1194
1000
2018I 2019
Year 3 Monitoring \Survey Year 4 Monitoring \Survey
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Neighbors Branch Year 2 (2017) Profile - Station 10+00 to 16+00
1100
1200
1300
Distance (feet)
Year 0 (2016) Bed (Year 1(2016) Bed -*-Year 2 (2017) Bed
)(-Year 2 (2017) Water Surface
1400
* TOB
1500
0 Engineered Structure
1600
2016
2016
2017
2018
2019
Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.0222
0.0220
0.0221
Riffle Length
28
26
31
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.0043
0.0046
0.0041
Pool Length
12
15
12
Pool to Pool Spacing
36
34
38
1100
1200
1300
Distance (feet)
Year 0 (2016) Bed (Year 1(2016) Bed -*-Year 2 (2017) Bed
)(-Year 2 (2017) Water Surface
1400
* TOB
1500
0 Engineered Structure
1600

Project Name: Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
D50
9.8
D84
Cross-Section: 1
D95
Feature:
Riffle
Cumulative Percent
2017
Description
Material Size (mm) Total # Item % Cum %
Silt/Clay
silt/clay
0.062
2
6%
36%
4
0
>
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
oil
:119Lt12
U
I
Sand
very fine sand 0.125 2 6% 44%
fine sand 0.250 1 3% 48%
medium sand 0.50 3 9% 48%
coarse sand 1.00 4 11% 56%
very coarse sand 2.0 1 3% 60%
Gravel
very fine gravel
4.0
1
3%
68%
fine gravel 5.7 1 3% 72%
fine gravel 8.0 0 0% 84%
medium gavel 11.3 4 11% 92%
medium gravel 16.0 2 6% 92%
o > >o
Particle Size (mm)
—
course gravel 22.3 5 14% 96%
course gravel 32.0 3 9% 96%
very coarse gravel 45 3 9% 96%
-MYO-2016
-MYt-2016 -MY2-2017 -MY3-2ot8 -MY4-2019 :MY5-2020
very coarse gravel 64 1 3% 100%
Cobble
small cobble
90
0
0%
100%
medium cobble 128 1 3% 100%
50%
Individual Class Percent
large cobble 180 1 3% 100%
very large cobble 256 0 0% 100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
45%
small boulder 512 0 0% 100%
40%
medium boulder 1024 0 0% 100%
35%
large boulder 2048 0 0% 100%
a 30%
Bedrock
bedrock
40096
0
0%
100%
25%
TOTAL % of whole count35
100%
100%
0
20%
Summary Data
s
15%
10%
b
5%
0%
oobryo~ry�
Particle Size (mm)
■MYO-2016
MMYt-2016 ■MY2-2017 ■MY3-2018 ■MY4-2019 ■MY5-2020
D50
9.8
D84
33
D95
98

Feature: Riffle
Summary Data
D50 1.8
D84 38
D95 59
2017
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
silt/clay
0.062
1
3%
33%
Sand
very fine sand
0.125
2
5%
43%
fine sand 0.250 2 5%
48%
medium sand 0.50 4 10%
52%
coarse sand 1.00 6 15%
62%
very coarse sand 2.0 6 15%
67%
Gravel
very fine gravel
4.0
3
8%
67%
fine gravel 5.7 1 3%
67%
fine gravel 8.0 1 3%
71%
medium gravel 11.3 0 0%
76%
medium gravel 16.0 4 10%
86%
course gravel 22.3 1 1 3%
90%
course gravel 32.0 1 3%
95%
very coarse gravel 45 3 8%
95%
very coarse gravel 64 4 10%
95%
Cobble
small cobble
90
1
3%
100%
medium cobble 128 0 0%
100%
large cobble 180 0 0%
100%
very large cobble 256 0 0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0 1
0%
100%
small boulder 512 0 0%
100%
medium boulder 1024 0 0%
100%
large boulder 2048 0 0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
40096
0
0%
100%
TOTAL % of whole count
40
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50 1.8
D84 38
D95 59
Individual Class Percent
50%
45%
a 40%
� 35%
a 30%
25%
v 20%
a 15%
a 10%
^C 5%
0%
Particle Size (mm)
�-Y.-MM ■M11 -2M .-2-2011 ■M13-2015 ■--2019 •M11-2020
■■■■11111■■■111111■■■�11111�=%�/1111■■■���■�
■■■■11111■■■�IIIII■■/■��Illr���lllll■■■�IIIII
_ ,,,
■■■■11111■■■�IIIII���_��� ���■�IIIII■■■�IIIII
■■■■11111■■■111Di��_■I_.�■■111111■■■111111
, ,
■■■■11111■■■�IIdII/.���IIIII■■■�IIIII■■■�IIIII
- . , , ,
■■■■11111■■■�11D;/I■■�IIIII■■■�IIIII■■■�IIIII
,,,
■■■■11111■■�./�1,,,��■■�IIIII■■■�IIIII■■■�IIIII
■■■■11111■�/.�:1111■■■�IIIII■■■�IIIII■■■�IIIII
�■■�1�111����11111■■■�IIIII■■■�IIIII■■■�IIIII
,,,
■■■■1%::ice■■�IIIII■■■111111■■■111111■■■111111
Individual Class Percent
50%
45%
a 40%
� 35%
a 30%
25%
v 20%
a 15%
a 10%
^C 5%
0%
Particle Size (mm)
�-Y.-MM ■M11 -2M .-2-2011 ■M13-2015 ■--2019 •M11-2020

Summary Data
D50 0.9
D84 18
D95 28
Cumulative Percent
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
a
50
� 40%
30%
U 20%
10%
0%
Feature: Riffle
>o
00
000
ti
Particle Size
2017
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
silt/clay
0.062
3
9%
24%
Sand
very fine sand
0.125
1
3%
32%
fine sand 0.250 2 6%
44%
medium sand 0.50 6 17%
48%
coarse sand 1.00 1 6 17%
56%
very coarse sand 2.0 3 9%
60%
Gravel
very fine gravel
4.0
1
3%
68%
fine gravel 5.7 3 9%
72%
fine gravel 8.0 2 6%
80%
medium gravel 11.3 0 0%
80%
medium gravel 16.0 1 3%
84%
course gravel 22.3 4 11%
96%
course gravel 32.0 2 6%
96%
very coarse gravel 45 1 3%
96%
very coarse gravel 64 0 0%
100%
Cobble
small cobble
90
0
0%
100%
medium cobble 128 0 0%
100%
large cobble 180 0 0%
100%
very large cobble 256 0 0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder 512 0 0%
100%
medium boulder 1024 0 0%
100%
large boulder 2048 0 0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
40096
0
0%
100%
TOTAL % of whole count
35
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50 0.9
D84 18
D95 28
Cumulative Percent
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
a
50
� 40%
30%
U 20%
10%
0%
50%
45%
40%
35%
a 30%
25%
U 20%
0 15%
10%
C
5%
0%
oob'LO,,.yS oy5 oh ti ti A h^ W ,,ti'7 tib ryti", �ti p5 ba qo ,ti0 1�0 ry5b �b`L hti'L �oyD.ry�4bo�b
Particle Size (mm)
•MYO-2016 OMYI-2016 ■MY2-2017 ■MY3-2018 ■MY4-2019 •MY5-2020
Individual Class Percent
>o
00
000
ti
Particle Size
(ram)
-MYO-2016
-MY1-2016
-MY2-2017 -MY3-2018
-MY4-2019 �MYS-2020
50%
45%
40%
35%
a 30%
25%
U 20%
0 15%
10%
C
5%
0%
oob'LO,,.yS oy5 oh ti ti A h^ W ,,ti'7 tib ryti", �ti p5 ba qo ,ti0 1�0 ry5b �b`L hti'L �oyD.ry�4bo�b
Particle Size (mm)
•MYO-2016 OMYI-2016 ■MY2-2017 ■MY3-2018 ■MY4-2019 •MY5-2020
Individual Class Percent

Feature: Riffle
Summary Data
D50 7.7
D84 31
D95 49
Cumulative Percent
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
° 50%
40%
E 30%
0
U 20%
10%
0%
,
do°0
ti
2017
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
silt/clay
0.062
1
3%
68%
Sand
very fine sand
0.125
2
6%
72%
fine sand 0.250 1 3%
84%
medium sand 0.50 0 0%
84%
coarse sand 1.00 4 11%
88%
very coarse sand 2.0 3 9%
92%
Gravel
very fine gravel
4.0
2
6%
100%
fine gravel 5.7 1 3%
100%
fine gravel 8.0 4 11%
100%
medium gravel 11.3 1 3%
100%
medium gravel 16.0 3 9%
100%
course gravel 22.3 2 6%
100%
course gravel 32.0 6 17%
100%
very coarse gravel 45 3 9%
100%
very coarse gravel 64 1 3%
100%
Cobble
small cobble
90
1
3%
100%
medium cobble 128 0 0%
100%
large cobble 180 0 0%
100%
very large cobble 256 0 0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder 512 0 0%
100%
medium boulder 1024 0 0%
100%
large boulder 2048 0 0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
40096
0
0%
100%
TOTAL % of whole count
35
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50 7.7
D84 31
D95 49
Cumulative Percent
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
° 50%
40%
E 30%
0
U 20%
10%
0%
Individual Class Percent
50%
45%
40%
35%
a 30%
25%
v 20%
d 15%
S 10%
b
5%
0%
oO
Particle Size (mm)
•MYO-2016 ■MYl-2016 ■MY2-2017 MMY3-2018 ■MY4-2019 •MY5-2020
,
do°0
ti
00
10
Particle Size (mm)
-MYO-2016 -MY1-2016
-MY2-2017 -MY3-2018
-MY4-2019
-MYs-zozo
Individual Class Percent
50%
45%
40%
35%
a 30%
25%
v 20%
d 15%
S 10%
b
5%
0%
oO
Particle Size (mm)
•MYO-2016 ■MYl-2016 ■MY2-2017 MMY3-2018 ■MY4-2019 •MY5-2020

Summary Data
D50 20.9
D84 60
D95 98
100%
90%
80%
c 70%
60%
° 50%
40%
E 30%
a
U 20%
10%
0%
do
Particle Size (mm)
-MYO-2016 -MY1-2016 -MY2-2017 -MY3-2018 -MY4-2019 �MYS-2020
Cumulative Percent
Individual Class Percent
50%
45%
40%
d 35%
4 30%
25%
v 20%
v 15%
6 10%
ro
5%
0%
oob`1'o�'L5 o'L5 Oy 1 'L b 5^ 4 1�'7 11p ,lti'S 4ti p5 b6` q0 �ti4 140 ,y5b ,�b�' S1'L,pyb'l�p, b���
Particle Size (mm)
-M-YO-2016 EMYI-2016 MMY2-2017 MMY3-2018 ■MY4-2019 •MY5-2020
Feature: Riffle
2017
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
silt/clay
0.062
0
0%
68%
Sand
very fine sand
0.125
0
0%
72%
fine sand 0.250 0 0%
84%
medium sand 0.50 2 6%
84%
coarse sand 1.00 2 6%
88%
very coarse sand 2.0 4 11%
92%
Gravel
very fine gravel
4.0
1
3%
100%
fine gravel 5.7 1 3%
100%
fine gravel 8.0 2 6%
100%
medium gravel 11.3 0 0%
100%
medium gravel 16.0 3 9%
100%
course gravel 22.3 3 9%
100%
course gravel 32.0 7 20%
100%
very coarse gravel 45 2 6%
100%
very coarse gravel 64 3 9%
100%
Cobble
small cobble
90
3
9%
100%
medium cobble 128 1 3%
100%
large cobble 180 1 3%
100%
very large cobble 256 0 0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder 512 0 0%
100%
medium boulder 1024 0 0%
100%
large boulder 2048 0 0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
40096
0
0%
100%
TOTAL % of whole count
35
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50 20.9
D84 60
D95 98
100%
90%
80%
c 70%
60%
° 50%
40%
E 30%
a
U 20%
10%
0%
do
Particle Size (mm)
-MYO-2016 -MY1-2016 -MY2-2017 -MY3-2018 -MY4-2019 �MYS-2020
Cumulative Percent
Individual Class Percent
50%
45%
40%
d 35%
4 30%
25%
v 20%
v 15%
6 10%
ro
5%
0%
oob`1'o�'L5 o'L5 Oy 1 'L b 5^ 4 1�'7 11p ,lti'S 4ti p5 b6` q0 �ti4 140 ,y5b ,�b�' S1'L,pyb'l�p, b���
Particle Size (mm)
-M-YO-2016 EMYI-2016 MMY2-2017 MMY3-2018 ■MY4-2019 •MY5-2020

Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Neighbors Creek)
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site - NCDMS Project Number 92872
Parameter Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition (Neighbors Cr)
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design (Neighbors Cr)
Monitoring Baseline (Neighbors Cr)
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
LL UL Eq.
Min
Mean Med
Max SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max SD
Min
Max
Med
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
BF Width (ft)
5.4
5.9
12.7
11.0
9.6
11.1 12.5
2
Floodprone Width ft
7.4
17.1
150
70
100
2
BF Mean Depth ft
0.9
1.1
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8 0.8
2
BF Max Depth ft
1.2
1.5
1.2
1.1
1.5
1.7 1.8
2
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft)
4.9
6.5
11.4
8.3
8.0
9.0 9.9
2
Width/Depth Ratio
5.3
5.8
14.1
14.0
12.0
13.8 15.6
2
Entrenchment Ratio
1.4
2.9
11.8
6.4
8.0
9.2 10.4
2
Bank Height Ratio
1.6
2.6 1
1.0
1.0
1
1.0
2
Profile
Riffle length ft
5.4
28.3
25.5 64.7
18.2
13
Riffle slope ft/ft
0.025
0.035
0.0344
0.0120
0.0000
0.0043
0.0022 0.0121
0.0046
13
Pool length ft
6.5
11.9
10.4 21.3
5.2
15
Pool Max depth ft
1.7
1.8
2.2
2.0
2.8
2.8 2.8
1
Pool spacing (ft)
16.4
99.2
38.8
64.7
33.0
56.1
7.0
36.1
37.9 74.7
19.8
15
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth ft
8
22
30.5
32
27.5
66
27.5
66
2
Radius of Curvature ft
5
22
14.5
20
22
44
22
44
2
Rc:Bankfull width ft/ft
0.9
1.5
1.1
1.6
2
4
2
4
2
Meander Wavelength ft
30
128
95
98
44
110
44
110
2
Meander Width ratio
1.5
4.1
2.4
2.5
4
10
4
10
2
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress com etenc lbs/ft2
Max part size (nun) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport canacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Ros en Classification
G5/4 - E5/4
C
C
E/C
Bankfull Velocity s
3.86-5.09
Bankfull Discharge cfs
25
Valley Length ft
----
----
Channel Thalweg Length ft
----
----
541
Sinuosi
1.01 - 1.21
1.22
1.18
1.18
Water Surface Slope ft/ft
0.019 - 0.0204
0.0205
0.008
0.0222
BF slope ft/ft
----
----
----
----
Bankfull Floodplain Area acres
----
----
----
----
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
----
----
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
I
I
----
I
----
Biolo ical or Other
----
----

Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Walton Crawley Property)
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site - NCDMS Project Number 92872
Parameter Gauge
Regional CurvePre-
Existing Condition (WC Property)
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design (WC Property)
Monitoring Baseline (WC Property)
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
LL UL Eq.
Min
Mean Med
Max SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max SD
Min
Max
Med
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
BF Width (ft)
7.9
9.4
12.7
15.5
13.2
14.3 16.8
3
Floodprone Width ft
12.9
16.8
150
55
90
100
3
BF Mean Depth ft
0.8
0.9
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.4 1.5
3
BF Max Depth ft
0.9
1.1
1.2
1.4
1.9
2.0 2.0
3
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft)
6.2
8.4
11.4
16.6
17.6
19.4 25.0
3
Width/Depth Ratio
10.2
10.4
14.1
14.0
10.2
10.2 11.2
3
Entrenchment Ratio
1.6
1.8
11.8
4.5
6.0
7.0 7.6
3
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
2.8
1.0
1.0
1.0
3
Profile
Riffle length ft
6.7
23.9
16.2 58.1
18
20
Riffle slope ft/ft
0.024
0.030
0.0344
0.0077
0.0000
0.0032
0.0018 0.0113
0.0036
20
Pool length ft
7.9
24.8
24.8 63.1
10.8
27
Pool Max depth ft
1.9
2.1
2.2
2.4
1.3
1.4 1.5
2
Pool spacing (ft)
6.0
40.8
38.8
64.7
15.5
79.2
14.9
42.5
36.4 93.6
21.3
27
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth ft
16
25
30.5
32
38.8
93
38.8
93
2
Radius of Curvature ft
5
14
14.5
20
31
62
31
62
2
Rc:Bankfull width ft/ft
0.5
1.5
1.1
1.6
2
4
2
4
2
Meander Wavelength ft
103
121
95
98
77.5
155
77.5
155
2
Meander Width ratio
11
12.9
2.4
2.5
5
10
5
10
2
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress com etenc lbs/ft2
Max part size (nun) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport canacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Ros en Classification
B/G
C
C
E/C
Bankfull Velocity s
3.9-7.5
Bankfull Discharge cfs
24-63
Valley Length ft
----
----
Channel Thalweg Length ft
----
----
1148
Sinuosi
1.01-1.2
1.22
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope ft/ft
0.0135-0.0340
0.0205
0.0045
0.0145
BF slope ft/ft
----
----
----
----
Bankfull Floodplain Area acres
----
----
----
----
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
----
----
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
----
----
Biolo ical or Other
----
----

Table lla. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawlev Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site - NCDMS Proiect Number 92872
"Parameter
Cross Section 1 (Neighbors Branch
Riffle
Cross Section 2 (Neighbors Branch
Pool
MY -1 (Neighbors Branch)
Cross Section 3 (Neighbors Branch
Riffle
Dimension
MYO
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY5+ MYO
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY5+ MYO
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+
BF Width ft
12.5
11.1
11.9
8.5
10.4
9.7
9.6
8.7
8.9
Floodprone Width (ft) (approx)
100.0
100.0
100.0
NA
NA
NA
100.0
100.0
100.0
BF Mean Depth ft
0.8
0.9
0.8
1.6
1.4
1.4
0.8
0.9
0.9
BF Max Depth ft
1.8
1.6
1.8
2.8
2.9
3.0
1.5
1.5
1.6
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft)
9.9
9.6
9.5
13.6
14.1
14.0
8.0
8.1
8.1
Width/Depth Ratio
15.8
12.8
14.9
NA
NA
NA
11.5
9.3
9.8
Entrenchment Ratio
8.0
9.0
8.4
NA
NA
NA
10.4
11.5
11.2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 mm
0.8
4.9
9.8
----
----
----
0.7
1.1
1.8
Table l lb. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site - NCDMS Project Number 92872
Parameter
Baseline (Neighbors Branch)
MY -1 (Neighbors Branch)
MY -2 (Neighbors Branch)
MY -3 (Neighbors Branch) MY -4 (Neighbors Branch) MY -5 (Neighbors Branch)
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
BF Width ft
9.6
11.1 12.5
2
8.7
9.9 11.1
2
8.9
10.4 11.9
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
100
2
100
2
100
2
BF Mean Depth ft
0.8
0.8 0.8
2
0.9
0.9 1 0.9
2
0.8
0.9 1 0.9
2
BF Max Depth ft
1.5
1.7 1.8
2
1.5
1.6 1.6
2
1.6
1.7 1.8
2
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2)8.0
9.0 9.9
2
8.1
8.9 9.6
2
8.1
8.8 9.5
2
Width/Depth Ratio
12.0
13.8 15.6
2
9.7
11.0 12.3
2
9.9
12.4 14.9
2
Entrenchment Ratio
8.0
9.2 10.4
1 1
2
9.0
1
1 10.3 11.5
1
2
8.4
1
1 9.8 11.2
1
2
Bank Height Ratiol
I
1 1.0 1
2
1
1.0 1
2
1.0 1
2
Profile
Riffle length ft
5.4
28.3
25.5 64.7
18.2
13
7.2
26.2
24.9 58.5
17.6
12
8
31
30 66
18
12
Riffle slope (ft/ft)
0.0000
0.0043
0.0022 0.0121
0.0046
13
0.0000
0.0046
0.0035 0.0157
0.0046
12
0.0000
0.0041
0.0028 0.0143
0.0042
12
Pool length (ftj
7
12
10 21
5
15
7
15
15 26
5
16
4
12
11 27
6
14
Pool Max depth ft
2.8
2.8 2.8
1
2.9
2.9 2.9
1
3.0
3.0 3.0
1
Pool spacing (ft)
7
36
38 75
20
15
7
34
32 74
19
16
11
38
38 74
19
14
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
27.5
66
2
Radius of Curvature ft
22
44
2
Rc:Bankfull width ft/ft
2
4
2
Meander Wavelength ft
44
110
2
Meander Width ratio
4
10
2
Additional Reach Parameters
Ros en Classification
E/C-type
E/C-type
E/C-type
Channel Thalweg Length ft
541
547
538
Sinuosity
1.18
1.18
1.18
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0222
0.022
0.0221
BF slope ft/ft
-----
-----
Ri%/RU%P%G%/S%
SC%/SA%/G%/C%/B%BE%
dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
0
0
0
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other

Table llc. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site - NCDMS Project Number 92872
Parameter
Cross Section 4 Walton Crawley Br
Riffle
Cross Section 5 (Walton Crawley Br)
Pool
MY -1 (Walton Crawley Br)
Cross Section 6 Walton Crawley Br
Riffle
Cross Section 7 Walton Crawley Br
Pool
MY -3 (Walton Crawley Br) MY -4 (Walton Crawley Br) MY -5 (Walton Crawley Br)
Cross Section 8 Walton Crawley Br
Riffle
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
Dimension
MYO
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY5+ MYO
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY5+ MYO
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY5+ MYO
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY5+ MYO
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+
BE Width (ft)
13.2
13.1
13.0
11.9
11.7
11.9
14.3
14.5
14.2
12.2
13.0
12.6
16.8
16.9
17.4
Floodprone Width (ft) (approx)
100.0
100.0
100.0
NA
NA
NA
100.0
100.0
100.0
NA
NA
NA
100.0
100.0
100.0
BE Mean Depth (ft)
1.3
1.4
1.4
2.8
3.0
2.9
1.4
1.3
1.4
2.7
2.8
2.7
1.5
1.4
1.6
BF Max Depth (ft)
1.9 1
2.0
2.0
3.7
4.0
4.1 1
2.0
1.9 1
2.0 1
3.4
1 3.2
3.3
2.0
2.0
2.1
BE Cross Sectional Area (ft)
17.6
18.2
17.9
32.9
35.2
35.1
19.4
19.5
20.2
33.0
35.9
34.1
25.0
24.4
27.0
Width/Depth Ratio
9.9
9.4
9.4
NA
NA
NA
10.5
10.8
10.0
NA
NA
NA
11.3
11.7
11.2
Entrenchment Ratio
7.6
7.6
7.7
NA
NA
NA
7.0
6.9
7.0
NA
NA
NA
6.0
5.9
5.7
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0 1
1.0
1.0
1 1.0
1.0 1
1.0
1.0
1.0 1
1.0
1.0
1 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 (mm) 1
0.7 1
0.6 1
0.9
----
I ----
I ---- 1 1
9.9
1 9.4 1
7.7 1
----
I ----
I ----
26.5
23.4
20.9
Table lld. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site - NCDMS Project Number 92872
Parameter
Baseline (Walton Crawley Br)
MY -1 (Walton Crawley Br)
MY -2 (Walton Crawley Br)
MY -3 (Walton Crawley Br) MY -4 (Walton Crawley Br) MY -5 (Walton Crawley Br)
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
BE Width (ft)
13.2
14.3 16.8
3
13.1
14.5 16.9
3
13.0
14.2 17.4
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
100
3
100
3
100
3
BE Mean Depth (ft)
1.3
1.4 1.5
3
1.3
1.4 1.4
3
1.4
1.4 1.5
3
BF Max Depth (ft)
1.9
2.0 2.0
3
1.9
2.0 2.0
3
2.0
2.0 2.1
3
BE Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)
17.6
19.4 25.0
3
18.2
19.5 24.4
3
17.9
20.2 27.0
3
Width/Depth Ratio
10.2
10.2 11.2
3
9.4
11.2 12.1
3
9.3
10.1 11.6
3
Entrenchment Ratio
6.0
7.0 7.6
3
5.9
6.9 7.6
3
5.7
1 7.0 7.7
3
Bank Height Ratiol
1
1.0
1
3
1
1
1.0
3
1.0 1
3
Profile
Riffle length (ft)
6.7
23.9
16.2 58.1
18
20
6
24
20 73
17
22
7
25
19 72
19
21
Riffle slope (ft/ft)
0.0000
0.0032
0.0018 0.0113
0.0036
20
0.0000
0.0055
0.0015 0.0241
0.0071
21
0.0000
0.0030
0.0013 0.0124
0.0041
21
Pool length (ft)
8
25
25 63
11
27
6
23
22 41
9
27
6
22
20 57
10
28
Pool Max depth (ft)
1.3
1.4 1.5
2
3.2
3.6 4.0
2
3.3
3.7 4.1
2
Pool spacing (ft)
15
43
36 94
21
27
20
42
35 94
19
27
6
41
35 94
22
28
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
38.8
93
2
Radius of Curvature (ft)
31
62
2
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
2
4
2
Meander Wavelength (ft)
77.5
155
2
Meander Width ratio
5
10
2
Additional Reach Parameters
Ros en Classification
E/C-type
E/C-type
E/C-type
Channel Thalweg Length ft
1148
1144
1141
Sinuosity
1.1
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0145
0.0143
0.0146
BF slope ft/ft)
-----
-----
Ri%/RU%P%G%/S%
SC%/SA%/G%/C%/B%BE%
dl6/d35/d5O/d84/d95
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
0
0
0
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other

Appendix E.
Hydrology Data
Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Table 13. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Summary
Figure E1. 30-70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall
Groundwater Gauge Graphs
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Monitoring Year 2 or 5 (2017)
DMS Project No. 92872 December 2017
McDowell County, NC Appendices

Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Site (DMS Project Number 92872)
Date of Data
Date of Occurrence
Method
Photo (if
Collection
available)
August 19, 2016
July 4, 2016
Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after
___
approximatel 1.88 inches of rain documented in one day.
May 18, 2017
April 23, 2017
Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after
---
approximately 1.76 inches of rain documented in one day.
*Weather Underground 2017
Table 13. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Summary
*Gauge 1 malfunctioned for 6 days (July 29 to August 3, 2017); however, based on precipitation data as well as data
from Gauge 2, it is expected that this gauge would have continued to be saturated/inundated during this 6 day period.
Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch Monitoring Year 2 or 5 (2017)
DMS Project No. 92872 December 2017
McDowell County, NC Appendices

7
6
U
U
5
0
4
3
2
1
0
e,
Figure E1: Neighbors Branch/Walton Crawley Branch
30-70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall
Data from WETS Station: MARION, NC 5340
.r]
C
2016
2017
30th Percentile
-70th Percentile

Neighbors Branch Groundwater Gauge 1
Year 2 (2017 Data)
12
10
in Growing
Season
End
Growing
Season
8
March
26
November
5
6
4
2
0
_
I
_
11P
N.
rh
-2
4
I
Malfunction
-6
M -8
3
c =i0
225
Days
c7
-14
I
-16
I
-18
I
-20
I
22
I
-24
I
-26
I
28
I
-30
I
-32
I
-34
I
-36
I
I
-38
—
—
- –
ULU
I Ili
-40
W
W
A
A
A
A
In
kn
kn
Ul Lp
In
N
In
l0
M
�
M
r -i N
M
l0
M
Dl
V V
� O
0
V
V
V
A
V
00
W
M
M
l0
1.0
tD
00
tD
lJl
N
l0
V
N
V
W Ol
V
Date
2.0
1.8
1.6
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0

12
10
8
6
4
2
_ 0
-2
-4
-6
°J -8
m
3 -10
v
3 -12
° -14
-16
-18
-20
-22
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
Neighbors Branch Groundwater Gauge 2
Year 2 (2017 Data)
2.0
1.8
1.6
W W cn ui ui cn cn m m m m '4 '4 '4 .i .i W W W W '.0 '.0 'D 'D r r . . N N
N N W F\-� F\-� N N W I\-� N N Ln N W I\-� I\-� N W V I\-� N N A F\-� N N
O V O V A In N lD N lD m O V A W In N l0 I--' N W m
V V V
Date
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0