20131140 Ver 1_Year 3 Monitoring Report 2017_20180102

Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 7
FINAL
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Contract No.: 004644
NCDMS Project No.: 95350
Montgomery County, NC
Data Collected: January — September 2017
Date Submitted: January 2018
Submitted to:
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
NCDEQ-DMS, 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699-1652

Prepared by:
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605

fires
January 26, 2018
Harry Tsomides
NC DEQ Division of Mitigation Services
5 Ravenscroft Drive, Suite 102
Asheville, NC 28801
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Corporate Headquarters
5020 Montrose Blvd. Suite 650
Houston, TX 77006
Main: 713.520.5400
RE: Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site: MY3 Monitoring Report (NCDMS ID 95350)
Listed below are comments provided by DMS on January 9, 2018 regarding the Pee Dee
Stream Restoration Site: Year 3 Monitoring Report and RES' responses.
Vegetation — general
While mapped invasives have decreased somewhat since 2016 as the result of 2017 treatment
(3.5 to 2.3 acres), invasive vegetation (mostly privet) is still significant. Please indicate in more
detail, or describe a plan for how and when this will be addressed in the near and far term.
Invasive treatments will continue as needed throughout the monitoring period. Treatments will
consist of cutting and spraying invasive plants during the growing season. This statement has
been added to the report.
There was some field discussion last year of a supplemental planting with 3 -gallon container
plants following invasive treatment, if the treatment results in damage or mortality to existing
stems. This was to be determined by RES in conjunction with the invasives treatment. If any
replanting has occurred or is expected, please describe.
Excessive planted stem mortality has yet to be observed from invasive treatment. All vegetation
plots are well above the interim success criteria. RES will assess the situation again in MY4.
Hydrology — general
During the February 2017 field meeting, additional hydrology monitoring was discussed along
reaches where poor hydrology was observed in stream sections near the former ponds where
silting had resulted in the lack of a well-defined channel, or a channel form that was dry. This
was apparent in two areas; (1) along sections of Enhancement I and Restoration of Thompson
Reach 1, and (2) the enhancement I section along Dale Reach 1 (about 100 linear feet where
flow went subsurface). Has any thought been given or monitoring device action taken to
address hydrology concerns along these upper sections? While site crest gages are reflecting
bank full events, the gages are located in the lower third of each reach. Narrative should
summarize any 'ponded' or potentially non -jurisdictional sections on the Pee Dee project
reaches.
RES will complete NCDWR stream determination forms on reaches in question. Additional
stream flow gauges can be installed on reaches with scores below 30 points.
res. us

0
Project Credits / Table 1
During the 2017 credit release process (2016 / MY02 for the project), credits associated with
streams located above and/or within the pond beds were withheld due to concerns with channel
development and lack of woody vegetation. RES should either submit an adaptive management
plan (AMP) to the IRT to address these concerns or acknowledge a project value/credit
reduction. Please indicate whether or not RES plans to submit an AMP.
RES plans to submit an AMP following on-site IRT meeting in 2018. The AMP will address the
pond bed and any additional regulatory concerns. This has been added to the report in Section
1.3.
Subsequent RES calculations of the "pond bed" credits were as follows:
Pee Dee — Thompson Creek 1
EI Above Pond: STA 100+7 to 102+50 (243 LF of 1.5:1, 162 SMUs)
Restoration Above Pond: STA 102+50 to 103+87 (137 LF of 1:1, 137 SMUs)
Restoration in Pond Bottom: STA 103+87 to 105+40 (153 LF of 1:1, 153 SMUs)
Total SMUs: 452 above and within pond bed withheld from 2016 Monitoring Year Release
Note - DMS will be withholding payment for these "at risk" unreleased pond bed credits for this
monitoring year. If the IRT acknowledges that these credits are valid and will be released at a
later date, DMS will revised future contract payments. The 2017 credit release process also
required that the project revert to approved mitigation plan assets.
Please replace the asset table (Table 1) in the current monitoring report with the one from the
approved mitigation plan. Then add a footnote similar to this: "*Credit calculations were
originally calculated along the as -built thalweg and updated to be calculated along stream
centerlines for Monitoring Year 3 after discussions with NC IRT stemming from the April 3, 2017
Credit Release Meeting."
Done.
In addition, Table 1 should have the following:
(a)"Creditable footage" column following the Restoration footage column, indicating creditable
footage to reflect adjustments due to reversion to mitigation plan credits, pond bed or non -
jurisdictional adjustments, crossings, etc;
(b)"Credits" column calculated by applying the credit ratio to the "Creditable footage" column,
SMU to the nearest tenth SMU
(c)"Notes" column at the far right (suggest move to landscape format) indicating adjustments
due (a) or other relevant information;
Please re -calculate project SMU following mitigation plan reversion (- 95.33 SMU) and pond bed
credit removal (452 SMU).
Done. The re -calculated project SMU is 5,956.3.
Formatting / Other edits
When CCPV is folded out, the Jerry Branch map appears upside down; also cross section
tables, etc. Even though this is not a problem in the digital PDF, sheets should not appear
upside down when the hard copy report is read.
Landscape printing issues have been corrected in the Final Report.

0
It would be helpful to show major station breaks on the CCPVs.
Done.
Section 1.3 table summations should be to the nearest tenth SMU.
Done.
Cross sections / cross section tables — A couple of methods are currently being utilized to
calculate the BHR from year to year. To compare subsequent monitoring years to the as -built
condition one can hold the bankfull depth static (denominator) while allowing the low TOB max
depth (numerator) to vary. Another method that has been proposed and is being evaluated is to
hold the as -built cross sectional area static within each years new cross section and allow that
to determine the maximum bankfull depth for each year. However if there are large changes in
the W/D ratio, either method can make for somewhat distorted BHR values depending upon the
direction and magnitude of the change in the W/D ratio. Please update the calculations to
reflect changes observed in the overlays and explain in detail as a table footnote how the
calculations were made. Be prepared to defend the method used for credit release and justify
through context whether or not any changes observed in a cross section represent an issue.
BHR was calculated on all riffle cross sections using the baseline bankfull elevation. All BHR fell
on or below the 1.2 threshold.
Final hard copies should be spiral or t -slot bound.
Done.
Margin formatting should be properly left -justified (see 2016 report).
Done.

Contents
1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY....................................................................................
1.1. Goals and Objectives...................................................................................
1.2. Success Criteria............................................................................................
1.3. Project Setting and Background...................................................................
1.4. Project Performance.....................................................................................
2.0 METHODS.......................................................................................................
3.0 REFERENCES.................................................................................................
5
5
5
6
7
8
9
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Project 3 RES
NCDMS Project No. 95350 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 7

Appendices
Appendix A. General Tables and Figures
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts
Table 4. Project Information
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Figures 2a -d. Current Conditions Plan View Maps
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
2017 Photo Station Photos
Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Metadata
Table 9. Total Planted Stem Counts
Vegetation Plot Photos
Appendix D. Stream Geomorphology Data
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 11 a. Dimensional Morphology Summary
Table l lb. Stream Reach Data Summary
Cross Section Plots
Pebble Count Data
Table 12. Pebble Count Data Summary
Charts 1-9. MY3 Stream Reach Substrate Composition Charts
Table 13. Bank Pin Array Summary
Appendix E. Hydrology Data
Table 14. Verification of Bankfull Events
Table 15.2017 Rainfall Summary
Chart 10. 2017 Pee Dee Site Precipitation Data
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Project 4 RES
NCDMS Project No. 95350 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 7

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
1.1. Goals and Objectives
The project goals address stressors identified in the TLW and include the following:
• Improve water quality within the restored channel reaches and downstream watercourses by
reducing sediment and nutrient inputs and increasing dissolved oxygen levels
• Improve local aquatic and terrestrial ecological function via stream shading, habitat
complexities, and organic/woody material introduction
• Improve aquatic and benthic macroinvertebrate habitat and associated stream bed form
• Improve site hydrology and attenuate flood flows on-site and downstream
• Provide approximately 18.6 acres of riparian area restoration with a native plant community
• Protect stream and riparian improvements with livestock best management practices
• Protect the site in perpetuity with a permanent conservation easement
The project goals will be addressed through the following project objectives:
• Implement Priority I or II restoration of 5,992 feet of stream and enhancement of 625 feet of
stream
• Implement appropriate changes in dimension, pattern and/or profile to create
geomorphologically stable conditions along project area reaches
• Modify degraded stream channels to enable proper sediment transport capacity and improved
stream bed character
• Construct a floodplain bench that is accessible at the proposed bankfull channel elevation.
• Remove a major impoundment
• Integrate in -stream structures and native bank vegetation
• Plant native woody and herbaceous riparian vegetation with a minimum width of 50 feet from
the edge of the restored channels
• Eradicate invasive, exotic or undesirable plant species
• Install cattle exclusion fencing, two new wells, two new cattle drinking stations, and upgrade
eight existing cattle drinking stations
1.2. Success Criteria
The success criteria for the Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site follows accepted and approved success
criteria presented in the USACE Stream Mitigation Guidelines and subsequent NCDMS and agency
guidance. Specific success criteria components are presented below.
1.2.1. Stream Restoration
Dimension — Cross-section measurements should indicate little change from the as -built cross-
sections. If changes do occur, they will be evaluated to determine whether the adjustments are
associated with increased stability or whether they indicate movement towards an unstable
condition.
Pattern and Profile — Measurements and calculated values should indicate stability with little
deviation from as -built conditions and established morphological ranges for the restored stream
type. Pool depths may vary from year to year, but the majority should maintain depths sufficient to
be observed as distinct features in the profile. The pools should maintain their depth with flatter
water surface slopes, while the riffles should remain shallower and steeper. Pattern measurements
will not be collected unless conditions seem to indicate that a detectable change appears to have
occurred based on profile and/or dimension measurements.
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Project 5 RES
NCDMS Project No. 95350 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 7

Substrate — Calculated D5o and D84 values should indicate coarser size class distributions of bed
materials in riffles and finer size class distributions in pools. The majority of riffle pebble counts
should indicate maintenance or coarsening of substrate distributions. Generally, it is anticipated that
the bed material will coarsen over time.
Sediment Transport — Depositional features should be consistent with a stable stream that is
effectively managing its sediment load. Point bar and inner berm features, if present, should
develop without excessive encroachment of the channel. Isolated development of robust (i.e.
comprised of coarse material and/or vegetation actively diverting flow) mid -channel or lateral bars
will be acceptable. Likewise, development of a higher number of mid -channel or lateral bars that
are minor in terms of their permanency such that profile measurements do not indicate systemic
aggradation will be acceptable, but trends in the development of robust mid -channel or alternating
bar features will be considered a destabilizing condition and may require intervention or have
success implications.
1.2.2. Surface Water Hydrology
Monitoring of stream surface water stages should indicate recurrence of bankfull flows on average every
1 to 2 years. At a minimum, throughout the monitoring period, the surface water stage should achieve
bankfull or greater elevations at least twice. The bankfull events must occur during separate monitoring
years.
1.2.3. Vegetation
Riparian vegetation monitoring shall be conducted for a minimum of seven years to ensure that success
criteria are met per USACE guidelines. Accordingly, success criteria will consist of a minimum survival
of 320 stems per acre by the end of the Year 3 monitoring period, a minimum of 260 stems per acre at the
end of Year 5, and a minimum of 210 stems per acre in Year 7. If monitoring indicates either that the
specified survival rate is not being met or the development of detrimental conditions (i.e., invasive
species, diseased vegetation), appropriate corrective actions will be developed and implemented.
1.3. Project Setting and Background
The Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site (Site) encompasses approximately 21.0 acres of predominately
agricultural land and includes three tributaries to Clarks Creek — Thompson Creek, Dale Branch, and
Jerry Branch. The Site is located in the Yadkin River Watershed (NCDWR sub -basin 03-07-10 and HUC
03040104020020) approximately 1 mile south of the town of Pee Dee, NC in Montgomery County
(Figure 1). Clarks Creek is listed as Class C water (NCDWR) and flows into the Pee Dee River. The Site
is located within a NCDMS targeted local watershed.
Following 2016 monitoring the NCIRT requested a review of the differential between the Approved
Mitigation Plan and Baseline Monitoring Report. The table below details the discrepancies by reach. The
primary cause of increased baseline SMUs is survey methodology (thalweg vs. centerline). The
Mitigation Plan lengths were based on centerline. Other causes of increased SMUs include field
adjustments during construction and the design assumption of the channel pattern after pond removal.
Credits for the stream reaches associated with the pond removal will be held until a later date. The new
SMU total for this site is 5,956.3 (Table 1).
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Project 6 RES
NCDMS Project No. 95350 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 7

1.4. Project Performance
Monitoring Year 3 (MY3) data was collected from January to September 2017. Monitoring activities
included visual assessment of all reaches and the surrounding easement, 16 permanent photo stations, 14
permanent vegetation monitoring plots, 22 cross-sections, 12 pebble counts, and 6 bank pin arrays.
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or easement encroachment
and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables
and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in
these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the
Mitigation Plan (formerly Restoration Plan) documents available on the NCDMS website
(http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/eep). All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is
available from NCDMS upon request.
1.4.1. Vegetation
Visual assessment of the easement (Appendix B - Table 6, Figure 2) indicates that herbaceous
vegetation has become well established throughout the project. Data collection from the 14 permanent
vegetation monitoring plots was conducted during September 2017. Summary tables and photographs
associated with MY3 monitoring efforts are located in Appendix C. Monitoring data collected during
MY3 indicate that all vegetation monitoring plots have met the MY3 interim success criteria of 320
planted stems per acre. Stem densities ranged from 364 to 1,052 stems per acre with a mean of 642 stems
per acre across all plots. A total of 18 woody plant species were documented within the monitoring plots.
When volunteer stems are included, densities ranged between 526 and 11,736 stems per acre with a mean
of 2,339 stems per acre across all plots. Invasive exotic vegetation has been identified throughout the Site
as Chinese privet (Lingustrum sinense). Invasive species treatments were administered in MY3 and
invasive exotic vegetation coverage has decreased to about 2.29 acres (Table 6, Figure 2). Treatments
will continue throughout the monitoring period and will consist of cutting and spraying during the
growing season.
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Project 7 RES
NCDMS Project No. 95350 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 7
Proposed Length
M igation
Reach
1Vlitigation Type
ProposedSM[Ts
Baseline SMUs
(LF)*
Ratio
Thompson
Enhancement I
401
1.5:1
166.7
162
Creek 1
Thompson
Creek 1-2
P1 Restoration
504
1:1
1,314
1349
Dale
Enhancement I
1,369
1.5:1
250
250
Branch 1
Dale
P1 Restoration
3,440
1:1
2,955
2,993
Branch 2-5
Jerry
P1 Restoration
1,852
1:1
1,670
1,691
Branch
Hudson
P1 Restoration
707
1:1
52.6
59
Branch
Total
8,273
6,408.3
6,504.0
*The contracted amount of credits for this Site is 6,138 SMUs
1.4. Project Performance
Monitoring Year 3 (MY3) data was collected from January to September 2017. Monitoring activities
included visual assessment of all reaches and the surrounding easement, 16 permanent photo stations, 14
permanent vegetation monitoring plots, 22 cross-sections, 12 pebble counts, and 6 bank pin arrays.
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or easement encroachment
and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables
and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in
these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the
Mitigation Plan (formerly Restoration Plan) documents available on the NCDMS website
(http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/eep). All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is
available from NCDMS upon request.
1.4.1. Vegetation
Visual assessment of the easement (Appendix B - Table 6, Figure 2) indicates that herbaceous
vegetation has become well established throughout the project. Data collection from the 14 permanent
vegetation monitoring plots was conducted during September 2017. Summary tables and photographs
associated with MY3 monitoring efforts are located in Appendix C. Monitoring data collected during
MY3 indicate that all vegetation monitoring plots have met the MY3 interim success criteria of 320
planted stems per acre. Stem densities ranged from 364 to 1,052 stems per acre with a mean of 642 stems
per acre across all plots. A total of 18 woody plant species were documented within the monitoring plots.
When volunteer stems are included, densities ranged between 526 and 11,736 stems per acre with a mean
of 2,339 stems per acre across all plots. Invasive exotic vegetation has been identified throughout the Site
as Chinese privet (Lingustrum sinense). Invasive species treatments were administered in MY3 and
invasive exotic vegetation coverage has decreased to about 2.29 acres (Table 6, Figure 2). Treatments
will continue throughout the monitoring period and will consist of cutting and spraying during the
growing season.
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Project 7 RES
NCDMS Project No. 95350 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 7

1.4.2. Stream Geomorphology
Visual assessment of the stream was performed to document signs of channel instability, such as eroding
banks, structural instability, or excessive sedimentation. No indication of instability was observed during
the visual assessment (Table 5 and Figure 2). Structures are intact and performing as designed.
Geomorphic data for MY3 was collected during June 2017. Summary tables and cross-section plots
related to stream morphology are located in Appendix D. MY3 stream morphology data indicate that, in
general, the stream is stable and lacking in any significant change.
Substrate monitoring was also performed during MY3. Riffle D5o ranged from medium gravel to very
coarse gravel on Jerry Branch, fine gravel to coarse gravel on Dale Branch, and very coarse gravel on
Thompson Branch. Substrate will be monitored in future years for shifts in particle size composition.
Overall, documented shifts in stream morphology were minimal, and do not exceed expectations between
MY2 and MY3. The project is meeting success criteria with regards to channel dimensions as well as
substrate particle size distributions, and sediment transport.
1.4.3. Stream Hydrology
Since project completion in April 2015 five bankfull events have been documented on both Jerry and
Thompson Branch and four on Dale Branch. One bankfull event was recorded in MY3 and that was on
Thompson Branch. (Table 13). The project has received multiple heavy precipitation events with no
degradation to the channel or structures. Stream reaches located above and in the old pond bed have not
been performing as designed. RES is developing an adaptive management plan in coordination with the
IRT for how to address the pond bed and any additional regulatory concerns.
2.0 METHODS
Visual assessments of the project were performed at the beginning and end of the monitoring year.
Permanent photo station photos were collected during vegetation monitoring. Additional vegetation or
stream problem areas within the project area were photo -documented. Geomorphic measurements were
taken using a Topcon GTS -312 Total Station. Three-dimensional coordinates associated with cross-
section and profile data were collected in the field and geo-referenced (NAD83 State Plane feet FIPS
3200). Morphological data was limited to 22 cross-sections.
Survey data was imported into CAD, ArcGIS, and Excel for data processing and analysis. Channel
substrate was characterized using a Wolman Pebble Count as outlined in Harrelson et al. (1994) and
processed using Microsoft Excel.
Vegetation success is being monitored using 14 permanent monitoring plots. Vegetation monitoring
followed CVS-EEP Level 1 Protocol for MY and is following Level 2 Protocol Version 4.2 for
monitoring years 2-7 (Lee et al. 2008). Level 2 Protocol includes analysis of species composition and
density of planted species. Data is processed using the CVS data entry tool. In the field, the four corners
of each plot were permanently marked with rebar and photos of each plot taken from the origin each
monitoring year.
Precipitation data was reported from the NCCRONOS station Uwharrie (Troy) up until its failure in June
2017. Precipitation data is now reported from the NCCRONOS station Albemarle 5.1 SSE. Three crest
gauges were installed to document bankfull events, one each on Jerry, Dale, and Thompson branches.
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Project 8 RES
NCDMS Project No. 95350 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 7

During quarterly visits to the site, the height of the corkline was recorded and cross-referenced with
known bankf ill elevations at each crest gauge.
3.0 REFERENCES
Harrelson, Cheryl, C. Rawlins and J. Potyondy. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated
Guide to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM -245. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment
Station. USDA Forest Service. Fort Collins, Colorado
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation. Version 4.2. http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm; accessed November 2008.
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Project 9 RES
NCDMS Project No. 95350 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 7

Appendix A
General Tables and Figures

Restoration footage accounts for crossings and exclusions.
2 B = Bioretention Cell; SF = Sand Filter; SW = Stormwater Wetland; WDP = Wet Detention Pond; DDP = Dry Detention Pond; FS = Filter Strip; S = Grassed Swale; LS = Level Spreader; NI = Natural Infiltration Area; FB = Forested Buffer
3Credit calculations were originally calculated along the as -built thalweg and updated to he calculated along stream centerlines for Monitoring Year 3 after discussions with NC IRT stemming from the April 3, 2017 Credit Release Meeting.
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site
Mitigation Credits
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non -riparian Wetland
Nitrogen
Buffer Nutrient Offset
Phosphorous Nutrient Offset
Type R
RE
R
RE
R
RE
Totals 5,956.3
- -
-
Project Components
Project Component -or- Reach
ID
Stationing/Location
Existing Approach Restoration -or-
Restoration Footage
Footage/Acreage (PI, PII etc.) Restoration or Acreage'
Equivalent
Creditable
Footage
Mitigation Ratio
3
Credits
Notes
Thompson Creek 1
100+0 - 102 + 50
250
PI EI 250
0
1.5
0
Adjusments due to pond
Thompson Creek 1 - 2
102+50 - 115+64
1,346
PI R 1,314
1,029
1
1,029
Adjustments due to pond
Dale Branch 1
200+00 - 203+75
375
PI EI 375
375
1.5
250
Dale Branch 2 - 5
203+75 - 234+50
2,407
PI R 2,955
2,955
1
2,955
Jerry Branch
300+00-317+30
1,832
PI R 1,670
1,670
1
1,670
Hudson Branch
403+05 - 403+58
53
PI R 52.6
52.6
1
52.6
0
Component Summation
-0
U_
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non -riparian Wetland Buffer
Upland
Restoration Level
(linear feet)
(acres)
(acres) (square feet)
(acres)
Riverine Non-Riverme
Restoration
5,706.3
-
-
- -
-
Enhancement
-
-
-
- -
-
Enhancement I
250
-
-
- -
-
Enhancement II
-
-
-
- -
-
Creation
-
-
-
- -
-
Preservation
-
-
-
- -
-
High Quality
Preservation
-
-
-
-
-
BMP Elements
Element'
Location
Purpose/Function
Notes
FB
Entire Site
Protect Stream
Restoration footage accounts for crossings and exclusions.
2 B = Bioretention Cell; SF = Sand Filter; SW = Stormwater Wetland; WDP = Wet Detention Pond; DDP = Dry Detention Pond; FS = Filter Strip; S = Grassed Swale; LS = Level Spreader; NI = Natural Infiltration Area; FB = Forested Buffer
3Credit calculations were originally calculated along the as -built thalweg and updated to he calculated along stream centerlines for Monitoring Year 3 after discussions with NC IRT stemming from the April 3, 2017 Credit Release Meeting.

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Completion
or Delivery
Mitigation Plan
Dec - 2013
Dec - 2013
Final Design - Construction Plans
N/A
Jan - 2014
Construction
N/A
April - 2015
Temporary S&E Mix Applied to Entire Project Area
N/A
April - 2015
Live Stakes and Bare Root Plantings for Entire Project Area
N/A
April - 2015
Baseline Monitoring Document (Year 0 Monitoring - Baseline)
April - 2015
July 2015
Year 1 Monitoring
Oct - 2015
Dec - 2015
Year 2 Monitoring
Jan - 2016
Oct - 2016
Year 3 Monitoring
Stream: June - 2017
Nov - 2017
Vegetation: Sept - 2017
Year 3 Invasive Species Treatment
---
June - 2017
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring
Year 6 Monitoring
Year 7 Monitoring

Table 3. Project Contacts
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street; Suite 110
Prime Contractor
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605
David Godley [phone]
Wolf Creek Engineering
12-1/2 Wall St., Suite C
Designer
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Gaunt Ginn [phone] ext 102
Northstate Environmental
2889 Lowery Street
Construction Contractor
Winston Salem, North Carolina 27101
Darrell Westmoreland [phone]
Northstate Environmental
2889 Lowery Street
Seeding Contractor
Winston Salem, North Carolina 27101
Darrell Westmoreland [phone]
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street; Suite 110
Planting Contractor
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605
David Godley [phone]
Kee Mapping and Surveying
PO Box 2566
As -built Surveys
Asheville, North Carolina 28802
Phillip B. Key [phone]
Green Resource
5204 Highgreen Court
Seedling Mix Source
Colfax, NC 27235
[phone]
ArborGen Inc.
2011 Broadbank Court
Ridgeville, SC 29472
[phone]
Bare Root Seedlings
North Carolina Forest Service
762 Claridge Nursery Road
Goldsboro, NC 27350
[phone]
Bear Duck Farms, LLC
105 Dobbs Place
Like Stakes
Goldsboro, NC 27350
Equinox Environmental
Monitoring Performers
37 Haywood St.
2015-202)
Asheville, North Carolina 28802
Drew Alderman [phone]
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
Monitoring Performers
302 Jefferson Street; Suite 110
017
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605
Ryan Medric [phone]

Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Project Information
Project Name
Pee Dee Stream Restoration
County
Montgomery County
Project Area (acres)
21
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
35°15'26.95" N, 80°01'47.83" W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Piedmont
River Basin
Yadkin
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit 03040104
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -Digit 03040104020020
DWQ Sub -basin
03-07-10
Project Drainage Area (acres)
286
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
<10%
CLIA Land Use Classification
2.01.03 Hay and Pasture Land
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
Thompson Creek
Dale Branch Jerry Branch
Hudson Branch
Length of reach (linear feet)
1,596
2,782 1,832
56
Valley classification (Rosgen)
II
H II
H
Drainage area (acres)
102
58 83
19
NCDWQ stream identification score
30.5
34 30.5
21.5
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification
C
C C
C
Morphological Description (stream type) (Rosgen)
B4
B4 B4
B4
Evolutionary trend (Rosgen)
IV
IV IV
IV
Underlying mapped soils
GoE, BeC2, BaC2
GoE, CnA GoE, BaC2, BaB2
BaC2
Drainage class
Well -drained
Well -drained Well -drained
Well -drained
Soil Hydric status
Non -Hydric
Non -Hydric Non -Hydric
Non -Hydric
Slope
2%
2% 2%
2%
FEMA classification
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
Native vegetation community
Agricultural
Agricultural Agricultural
Agricultural
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
5%
5% 5%
5%
Wetland Summary Information
Parameters
-
-
-
Size of Wetland (acres)
-
-
Wetland Type (non -riparian, riparian riverine or riparian non-riverine) -
-
-
Mapped Soil Series
-
-
-
Drainage class
_
_
-
Soil Hydric Status
_
_
-
Source of Hydrology
Hydrologic Impairment
-
-
-
Native vegetation community
-
-
-
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting
Documentation
Waters of the United States— Section 404
Yes
Yes
NWP
Waters of the United States — Section 401
Yes
Yes
401 Certification
Endangered Species Act
N/A
ERTR
Historic Preservation Act
N/A
ERTR
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/
Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA)
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat
N/A
ERTR

1 JJJ
St
i
j 73
R �1
' Pee Dee
4a 1
I
I�1
1
IAV
Norwood \-
G\°
�\ 731 M unt 'lead
1
)iia: -tions: From Asheville, take 140 East for approximately 99
_ miles. Take exit 148 for US -G4! NC -90 toward W Statesville.
�Continue onto US-70E1Carner Bengal IIlvd. Alter25miles turn
W. Sake Alexander Blvd and go 6 miles- Turn right.,to
Stokes Perry Road and drive 8 miles then tum right onto Liberty
\ 109 Rd/St Matthew Church Rd and drive 4 miles. Turn left mttoiSS
�•\ 52 S, atter 13 miles, turn lett onto NE connector Continue straight
through the first traffic circle and take the second exit at the second
1miYic --Ie. Tum nghl onto NC -740 S. Turn U1 onW NC -24
\ j
ENC -27 WINC-73 WE Main St. Aller 6 miles, sliglu right onle
NC -73 E and after 4 mike ,.none straight onto P-Dco Rd_ D-
0.2 miles to arrive tt the site.
- The subject project site is mr environmental restomfion site of the
15' ! NCDWQ Diykion of Mitigation Service, (DMS) and i,
cncnnrpassed by° a recorded conservation easemenL buL is
\ i borduod by land under private o-iership_ Accessing the site may
\ reyrure 1—rs ng areas near ur along the cawmenl bould— mud
�•\ / dterefore access by the general public is not permitted. Access by
authorized persomrcl of slate and federal agcrtcic; or their
- desigrimslconhacturs unolved in the developneal., ovenighl and
st--aidsflip ofthceswrati- site ispanuitwd wiflrin thetermsand
timeframes oftheir defined roles Anv intended site visitation or
activity by any person outside of these previously sanctioned roles
-- `- � / and activities requite., prior—Mi-n- with DMS.
res Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site
Project No. 95350 Notes: Conservation Easement from Key
Montgomery County, North Carolina Mapping & Survey, PA
Miles
0 0.5 1 2 3

Dale 1
F
Dale'2
K�
a ,._ Thompson 2
Thompson 1
Da -14F3
&W -
RU
Jerryi1
Dale' -4
DahF5
Jerry'3,'
fires
Riparian Buffer Conditions
Target Community
w Present Mar inal Absent
N
d Absent No Fill
CL
rn
i Present V
.y
V
= Common ----
s
0 150 300
Feet
1 inch = 350 feet
Figure 2
Pee Dee Stream
Restoration Project
MY3 2017
Current Conditions
Overview Map
Date: 11/1/2017
Drawn by: RTM
LEGEND
C Conservation Easement
Vegetation Plot
Cross Section
,gip$
Photo Station
® Crest Gauge
o Rain Gauge
Restoration
Enhancement I
Riparian Buffer Conditions
Target Community
w Present Mar inal Absent
N
d Absent No Fill
CL
rn
i Present V
.y
V
= Common ----

iplops, -7
✓ }y
Jerry 2
Hudson -
402x50 -- `
XS -2-R,0,
XS 3-P_
o
50- PS -2 0 O XS -4-R
N o o M o p`x 307+5 ~
N o rp M
x
O O M 1 rJ 00 O
o O M
M O
M PS -3Q, ho O 3
y o 0
� PS -1 @ M x�
o
M O
-6-R
XS
VC4 �' �J�
China -,p Privat XS -5-P o
Jerry 1
Jerry 3
a ft-W-W5-�J
�� M
O XS -7-R
o h�� PS -5
t M PS -4
x
O M
M ,
fires
N
0 75 s 150
Feet
1 inch = 150 feet
Figure 2a
r Pee Dee Stream
Restoration Project
MY3 2017
Current Conditions
Plan View Map
Date: 1/26/2015 Drawn by: RTM
LEGEND
Photo Station
Conservation Easement
® Crest Gauge
O Rain Gauge
— Stream Structure
s Cross Section
— Restoration
Enhancement I
— Top of Bank
Vegetation Plot Success
Met
Riparian Buffer Conditions
Target Community
y Present Mar inal Absent
15 m
.5 Absent No Fill
y 77777-1
i Present V
W
R — —
C Common

l
'v
VC4
Chinese Privet
K
C
yp �
Dale 2
U"
WP Xoo
Q
XS -10-R
Q 6-r
XS 11-P Xao
-
r �� Xh0 o XOO
PS -8
�o
�X
t
`v �O
fires
N
,N
5
0 50 100
Feet
1 inch = 100 feet
Figure 2b
Pee Dee Stream
Restoration Project
MY3 2017
Current Conditions
Plan View Map
Date: 1/26/2018 Drawn by: RTM
LEGEND
0 Conservation Easement
• Crest Gauge
- O Rain Gauge
Photo Station
Cross Section
— Stream Structure
— Top of Bank
— Restoration
Enhancement I
Vegetation Plot Succe
Met
Riparian Buffer Conditions
Target Community
y Present Mar inal Absent
m
u Absent No Fill
y
i Present V
W
R — —
C Common

^px pp PS -9b
^fix hp �^Ox
XS -12 -R
Dale 3
Dale 4
XS -13-P p
Ox
•' �^ xOp hp -
^o ti^ox �Oxoo �0 00 _
XS -14-P
rv� xh O
�rlrL xp �� PS -11
Chinese Privet � v ti�X `R o pp s o o° �px�o xp0 0 0 ,a
` #; o
rL� hx x�0
A
PS -10
x� ^O XS -16-R
yti Ch �. �O
XS -17-R
3i XS -18-P
. a •J � 2 p
:s 233+U
I v F 233+50
_-
Dale.15
r 23Q34+
shoe M 00 PS -12 n
xs0
t
•
fires
N
5
0 75 150
Feet
1 inch = 150 feet
Figure 2c
Pee Dee Stream
Restoration Project
MY3 2017
Current Conditions
Plan View Map
Date: 1/26/2015 Drawn by: RTM
LEGEND
0 Conservation Easement
• Crest Gauge
• Rain Gauge
' Photo Station
Cross Section
— Stream Structure
— Restoration
Enhancement I
— Top of Bank
Vegetation Plot Success
Met
Riparian Buffer Conditions
Target Community
y Present Mar inal Absent
d
.5 Absent No Fill
C
U)
Present V
C COm mon

VC2
Low Stem Density
s
Thompson 1
A.
44
PS -13 �\ �
10
Relic Pond Bed
PS14
V]�106+00
VC1
Exposed Bedrock
VC4
Chinese Privet 914+oo
rir
Li
Thompson 2
114+50 14
115+00
115+50
k- , Ok PS 16
117+00 1
":
1 fires
�X4j - &
4�X
N
N
0 75 s 150
Feet
1 inch = 150 feet
Figure 2d
ti
Pee Dee Stream
Restoration Project
MY3 2017
Current Conditions
Plan View Map
Date: 1/26/2015 Drawn by: RTM
LEGEND
A 0 Conservation Easement
Crest Gauge
Rain Gauge
Cross Section
Photo Station
— Stream Structure
— Top of Bank
— Restoration
Enhancement I
Vegetation Plot Success
Met
Riparian Buffer Conditions
Target Community
y Present Mar inal Absent
m
'u Absent No Fill
C
U)
i Present V
W
R — —
C Common
+00
107+50
1oa+oo
XS -19-P
1oa+50
v
0900
72
XS -20-R
10+ 00
n 0+50
111+00 �.
PS -15
XS -21-P
112+00
XS -22-R
,13.;
VC4
Chinese Privet 914+oo
rir
Li
Thompson 2
114+50 14
115+00
115+50
k- , Ok PS 16
117+00 1
":
1 fires
�X4j - &
4�X
N
N
0 75 s 150
Feet
1 inch = 150 feet
Figure 2d
ti
Pee Dee Stream
Restoration Project
MY3 2017
Current Conditions
Plan View Map
Date: 1/26/2015 Drawn by: RTM
LEGEND
A 0 Conservation Easement
Crest Gauge
Rain Gauge
Cross Section
Photo Station
— Stream Structure
— Top of Bank
— Restoration
Enhancement I
Vegetation Plot Success
Met
Riparian Buffer Conditions
Target Community
y Present Mar inal Absent
m
'u Absent No Fill
C
U)
i Present V
W
R — —
C Common

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site - Jerry Branch
Assessed Len th 1,832 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of Amount of
Unstable Unstable
Segments Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars).
0 0
°
100/o
2 Degradation - Evidence of downcutting.
0 0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
90 90
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Death Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6).
90 90
100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
90 90
100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
N/A N/A
N/A
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
90 90
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
0
0 100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A N/A
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse.
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
91
91
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
91
91
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
91
91
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence doesNOT exceed
15%.
5%
91
91
100
4. Habitat
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining` Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth Ratio > 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
91
91
100

Table 5 cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site - Dale Branch
Assessed Len th 2,782 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of Amount of
Unstable Unstable
Segments Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars).
0 0
°
100/o
2 Degradation - Evidence of downcutting.
0 0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
120 120
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Death Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6).
119 119
100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
119 119
100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
N/A N/A
N/A
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
119 119
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
0
0 100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A N/A
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse.
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
122
122
N/A
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
122
122
N/A
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
122
122
N/A
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence doesNOT exceed
15%.
5%
122
122
N/A
4. Habitat
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining` Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth Ratio > 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
122
122
N/A

Table 5 cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site - Thompson Branch
Assessed Len th 1,596 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of Amount of
Unstable Unstable
Segments Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars).
0 0
°
100/o
2 Degradation - Evidence of downcutting.
0 0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
50 50
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Death Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6).
50 50
100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
50 50
100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
N/A N/A
N/A
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
50 50
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
0
0 100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A N/A
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse.
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
51
51
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
51
51
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
51
51
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence doesNOT exceed
15
51
51
100
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining` Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth Ratio > 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
51
51
100

Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site
Planted Acreage 21.0
% of
Number of
Combined
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Planted
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
1. Rare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.
Red Vertical Hatch
1
0.02
0%
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4,
2. Low Stem Density Areas
or 5 stem count criteria.
Yellow Vetical Hatch
2
0.50
2%
Totals
3
0.52
2%
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
given the monitoring year.
N/A
0
0.00
0%
Cumulative Totals
3
0.52
2%
Easement Acreage 21.0 acres
% of
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Number of
Combined
Easement
Polygons
Acreage
Acrea e
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
Horizontal Hatch
16
2.29
11
(Red - Dense/Yellow - Present)
5. Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
N/A
0
0.00
0%

MY3 — 2017 Photo Station Photos
f A
2 �c
�"� "` �► ✓� � in �,, ^RNfI !'�'C R� �,4 fb� -. it's .}
a
Jerry Branch — Permanent Photo Station 1
Station 300+25 - Downstream
September 20, 2017
Jerry Branch — Permanent Photo Station 2
Station 305+04 — Upstream
September 20, 2017

-v
d >ate,+
'' � t
J '
Mo
+
- :rt
�r,.A1R�yw.

�3r.ggf.
a
.'.
fq' -
'
a

�y F
11�
S, iib Ia :�• v '1 :
�} t ,�

T
w
!i
i�
°lit
`�!` g�[� � k 1.'. �RS 'I,fi�•I Imo;.
lk
a...
� � r
t

9

U.StI. WWII
ltd�"(� �i.VY�vIY� Flf t`e » f
s"t., �..
°l'
i
`tY
- t 4
r
77
�F 1
S
1 �
Y
L_
Mei.
I
� x
' -
.,, _ LYf� ��. a.��m,. 11• .'tit e i

7 ivot
VA4
To
owl

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

Table 7. MY3 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Plot #
Stream
Stems/Acre
Volunteers
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Success
Criteria
Met?
Average
Tree Height
(cm)*
1
1052
931
1983
Yes
378
2
809
3683
4492
Yes
449
3
647
121
769
Yes
208
4
567
2145
2711
Yes
96
5
486
202
688
Yes
223
6
567
445
1012
Yes
167
7
445
81
526
Yes
81
8
526
202
728
Yes
179
9
850
10886
11736
Yes
295
10
364
971
1335
Yes
331
11
769
1052
1821
Yes
443
12
688
2914
3602
Yes
406
13
526
81
607
Yes
531
14
688
40
728
Yes
555
Project Avg
642
1697
2339
Yes
309
* Only the tallest eight trees were averaged, as this is the amount that represents 320 stems/acre.

Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
C e dar C re e k Stre am and Wetland Re s to ratio n Site
Report Prepared By
Matt DeAngelo
Date Prepared
9/25/2017 14:25
database name
Pee Dee MY3 2017 CVS.mdb
database location
C.\Users\mdeangelo\Dropbox (RES)\@RES Projects\North
Carohna\Pee Dee\Monitoring\Monitoring Data\MY3_2017\Vegetation
Data
computer name
DESKTOP-F4AI5MT
Me size
65540096
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of
project(s) and project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each
year. This excludes live stakes.
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year.
This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer
stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems,
dead stems, missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences
and percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for
each lot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted
and natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing
stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code 95350
project Name Pee Dee
Description
River Basin
le ngth(ft)
stream -to -edge width (ft)
area (sq m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots 14

Table 9. Total Planted Stem Counts
Pee Dee
Current Plot Data (MY32017)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
95350-01-0001
95350-01-0002
95350-01-0003
95350-01-0004
95350-01-0005
95350-01-0006
95350-01-0007
95350-01-0008
95350-01-0009
95350-01-0010
95350-01-0011
95350-01-0012
95350-01-0013
95350-01-0014
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type Pnol-S P -all T
Pnol-S P -all T
Pnol-S P -all
T
Pnol-S P -all T
Acer rubrum
Pnol-S P -all T
Pnol-S P -all T
100
Pnol-S P -all
T
Pnol-S P -all
T
Pnol-S P -all T
Pnol-S P -all T
Pnol-S P -all T
Betula nigra
Pnol-S P -all
T
Pnol-S P -all T
28
Pnol-S P -all T
45
Acerne undo boxelder Tree
42
42
42
51
51
51
Broussonetiapapyrifera
paper mulberry Exotic
1
Carya
hickory Tree
3
2
1
Carya alba
mockernut hickory Tree
4
Acer rubrum red maple Tree
1
Celtis occidentalis
common hackberry Tree
1153
325
Cephalanthus occidentali common buttonbush Shrub
100
220
Diospyrosvirginiana
common persimmon Tree
Betula nigra river birch Tree
9
9
10
4
4
4
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash Tree
24
1
1
1
2
2
2
6
6
6
33
33
Ilex opaca
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
Juglans nigra
blackwalnut Tree
Broussonetiapapyrifera paper mulberry Exotic
10
2
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum Tree
34
87
47
Liriodendron tulipifera vETulip-tree, Yellow PcTree
5
5
15
7
7
7
6
6
6
16
16
16
Pinustaeda
Carya hickory Tree
1
Platanus occidentalis var. Sycamore, Plane-trei Tree
78
78
101
80
80
152
79
79
81
87
87
87
Quercus
oak Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
83
83
83
Carya alba mockernut hickory Tree
swamp chestnut oak Tree
22
22
22
26
26
26
27
2
27
14
14
14
Quercus nigra
wateroak Tree
16
16
1
16
16
16
16
16
16
17
17
17
Quercus phellos
willow oak Tree
50
50
50
55
55
67
1
55
56
18
Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree
18
Rhus copallinum var. cop flameleaf sumac shrub
14
42
3
Rhus glabra
smooth sumac shrub
9
Salix nigra
blackwillow Tree
1
Cephalanthus occidentali common buttonbush Shrub
Ulmus alata
winged elm Tree
80
5
Ulmus americana
American elm Tree
312
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
2221
7
6421
2221 809
14
0.35
7 18
6421 23391
257
8
7431
257
14
0.35
8
7431
1873
16
54141
2551
8
7371
2551 650
14
0.35
8 17
7371 1879
Diospyrosvir iniana common persimmonTree 1
319
14
0.35
8
922
319
8
922
11
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
6
6
7
5
5
5
2 2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Ilex o aca American holly Tree
1
Juglans nigra black walnut Tree
Li uidambarst raciflua sweet um Tree
3
3
3
2
1
1
10
2
7
1
1
Liriodendrontulipiferav Tulip -tree, Yellow PcTree
4
4
5
1
1
1
1
8
Pinus taeda loblollypine Tree
1
Platanusoccidentalisvar. Sycamore, Plane-tre Tree
4
4
41
9
91
9
1
1
1
1
11
4
3
31
3
41
4
4
41
11
3
3
41
7 7
131
18 18
25
8
81
81
9 91
10
11
11
11
Quercus oak Tree
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree
2
2
2
3
31
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
5
5
1
1
1
1 1
1
4 4
41
4
4
Quercus nigra wateroak Tree
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree
3
3
3
1
1
1
7
7
7
9
9
9
3
3
3
4
4
4
1
1
1
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
1
1
1
Rhus co allinum var. co flameleaf sumac shrub
1
2
2
9
Rhus glabra smooth sumac shrub
Salix nigra blackwillow Tree
1
Ulmus alata winged elm Tree
16
Ulmus americana American elm Tree
16
75
Al11
150
1
70
Stem count
26
26
49
20
20
16
16
19
14
14
67
12
121
17
141
25
111
111
13
131
131
18
211
211
290
91 91
33
191 191
45
171
171
89
131 131
15
17
17
18
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
_141
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
Species countl
Stems per ACREI
61
10521
61
101
61
61
91
51
51
71
51
51
61
51
51
8
51
51
101
31
31
51
31
31
7
6
6 10
2
2
4
2 2
6
41
41
7
21 21
3
4
4
5
10521 19831 8091 8091 44921 6471 6471
7691 5671 5671 27111 4861
4861 688 5671 5671 10121 4451 4451
5261 5261 5261
728 8501
85011736 64
3
364 1335 7691 7691 1821 6881 6881
3602 5261 5261 607 6881
6881
728
Annual Means
Scientific Name
MY3 (2017)
Common Name Species Type Pnol-S P -all T
MY2 (2016)
PnoLS P -all T
MYl (2015)
Pnol-5 P -all T
MYO (2015)
Pnol-5 P -all T
Acernegundo
boxelder Tree
3
Acer rubrum
red maple Tree
100
Betula nigra
river birch Tree
27
27
28
45
45
46
42
42
42
51
51
51
Broussonetiapapyrifera
paper mulberry Exotic
1
Carya
hickory Tree
3
3
Carya alba
mockernut hickory Tree
4
1
Celtis occidentalis
common hackberry Tree
1153
325
Cephalanthus occidentali common buttonbush Shrub
220
Diospyrosvirginiana
common persimmon Tree
2
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash Tree
24
24
25
26
26
36
29
29
29
33
33
33
Ilex opaca
American holly Tree
1
Juglans nigra
blackwalnut Tree
10
2
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum Tree
34
87
47
Liriodendron tulipifera vETulip-tree, Yellow PcTree
5
5
15
7
7
7
6
6
6
16
16
16
Pinustaeda
loblollypine Tree
1
Platanus occidentalis var. Sycamore, Plane-trei Tree
78
78
101
80
80
152
79
79
81
87
87
87
Quercus
oak Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
83
83
83
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak Tree
22
22
22
26
26
26
27
271
27
14
14
14
Quercus nigra
wateroak Tree
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
17
17
17
Quercus phellos
willow oak Tree
50
50
50
55
55
67
55
55
56
18
18
18
Rhus copallinum var. cop flameleaf sumac shrub
14
42
3
Rhus glabra
smooth sumac shrub
9
Salix nigra
blackwillow Tree
1
Ulmus alata
winged elm Tree
80
5
Ulmus americana
American elm Tree
312
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
2221
7
6421
2221 809
14
0.35
7 18
6421 23391
257
8
7431
257
14
0.35
8
7431
1873
16
54141
2551
8
7371
2551 650
14
0.35
8 17
7371 1879
319
8
9221
319
14
0.35
8
922
319
8
922
Color for Density
Exceeds reg4ements by 10%
Exceeds requirements. but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requnements. by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Recilut Stents

fir+` � �,�r �.
F��+���••st
00,
5

tit
x,
?Y� r / 7►
Af
i
'
� d
If
,
µ
r f
�
A
i
'

Pee Dee - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 7
September 21, 2017
Pee Dee - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 8
September 21, 2017

l � l
ol
wyJ "
��w JA
-
'CFTC'
i
,
J A -
l � l
ol
wyJ "
VY

We
" yla
1
� . ' l��' � — �-� ryye J, ••. �'�
,t
rf. i 4
f - t

r Vy'j�

Appendix D
Stream Geomorphology Data

- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item docs not apply.
Non -Applicable
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site - Jerry Branch 1 (430 feet)
Parameter
Regional Curse
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
As -Built/ Baseline
Dimension&Substrate - Rime
LL
UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD
N
Min
Mean
Med Max SD N
Min Mean
Max Min Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.79 3.5
5.3 5.3 7.0 2.5
2
9.8
11.7
13.1
7.9
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.1
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
3.3
6.2 6.2 9.0 4.0
2
16.0
18.0
21
31.8 31.8 31.8
31.8
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
-
- 0.64 0.6
0.6 0.6 0.6 0.0
2
0.5
0.62
0.8
0.42
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
0.8 0.8 0.9 0.1
2
0.8
0.9
1.2
0.65
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft'
3.5 2.0
2.9 2.9 3.8 1.3
2
5.4
7.3
8
3.3
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
1
Width/Depth Ratio
6.0
9.4 9.4 12.8 4.8
2
12.3
18.8
- 19.6 - -
- 18.6
- 17.7
17.7
17.7
17.7
-
1
Entrenchment Ratio
0.5
1.6 1.6 2.6 1.5
2
L4
1.5
1.8
2.5
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
1
Bank Height Ratio
2.4
7.7 7.7 12.9 7.4
2
0.9
1
1.4
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
-
1
d50 (�)
-
- - - -
-
-
52
- - - -
- -
-
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
4.0
14.0
2.6
6.2
6.2 16.4
2.8
26
Riffle Slope(ft/ft)
-
- - - -
-
0.017
0.027ij
-
- 0.003
- 0.001 0.010 0.009 0.026 0.008
26
Pool Length (ft)
7.0
13.0
2.3
5.9
5.4 16.0
2.9
26
PoolMaxDepth(ft)
1.8
1.9
0.97
0.7
1.5
LS 2.3
0.4
26
PoolSpacing(ft)
180
390
22.5
6.1
15.0
14.2 27.8
5.1
25
Pattern
Channel Belt Width(ft)21.0
_
_ _ _ _
_
_
_
_ _ _
_ _
_ 14.0
19.2
19.2 24.4
7.3
2
Radius of Curvature (ft)
-
18.0
12.0
17.0 11.6
13.6
13.1 16.5
2.2
4
Re: Bankfull Width (ft)
-
- - - -
-
-
-
-
- - -
- -
- 1.4
1.7
1.6 2.0
0.3
2
Meander Wavelen h ft
_
_ _ _ _
_
_
_
_
_ _ _
_ _
_ 23.8
44.4
47.1 55.0
11.9
6
Meander Width Ratio
-
- - -
1.8
- - -
- 2
- 1.7
2.4
2.4 3.0
0.9
2
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
-
-
42%/0%/40%/7%/11%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
4%/2%/49%/38%/1%/6%
dl6/d35/d50/d84/195/dip /di" mm
--/5/6/13/22
14/36/ 52/110/170/ -/-
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib/ft2
-
0.562
-
-
Max Part Size (man) Mobilized at Bankfull
947
32
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Drain Area (mi)
0.07
0.42
Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
Rosgm Classification
-
B4c
B4
B4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
-
-
3.8
-
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
13.12
G
28.0
13
Valley Length (ft)
-
260.0
406
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
-
-
435
430
Sinuosity
-
1.50
1.0
1.06
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.037
0.0265
Bankfall Slope (ft/ft)
-
-
-
0.0267
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
-
Proportion Over Wide (%)
Entrenchment Class (ER Range)
-
Incision Class (BHR Range)
-
-
BEHI
24.03
Chanel Stability or Habitat Metric
-
-
Biological or Other
-
-
- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item docs not apply.
Non -Applicable

- Information unavailable.
N/A- Item does nota ly.
Non -Applicable
Table 10 cont'd. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site - Jerry Branch 2 (625 feet)
Parameter
Regional Curie
Pre -Fisting Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
As -Built/ Baseline
Dimension&Substrate - Rime
LL
UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD
N Min
Mean
Med Max SD N
Min Mean
Max Min Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Bankroll Width (fl)
4.78 3.5
6.0 6.6 8.0 2.3
3 9.8
11.7
13.1
7.1
7.1
7.1
7.1
7.1
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
2.5
10.8 15.0 15.0 7.2
2 16.0
18.0
- 21 - -
- -
- 16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
-
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.76 0.4
0.6 0.7 0.8 0.2
3 0.5
0.62
0.8
0.53
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.5
0.7 0.8 1.0 0.2
3 0.8
0.9
1.2
0.75
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft'
5.1 2.4
2.7 2.7 3.0 0.3
3 5.4
7.3
8
3.7
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
1
Width/Depth Ratio
4.6
15.2 14.6 26.3 10.9
3 12.3
18.8
- 19.6 - -
- 13.4
- 16.4
16.4
16.4
16.4
-
1
Entrenchment Ratio
0.7
1.6 1.9 2.3 0.8
3 L4
1.5
1.8
3.5
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
1
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
3.5 1.5 7.9 3.8
3 0.9
1
1.4
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1
d50 (�)
-
- - - -
- -
52
- - -
- -
-
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
4.0
14.0
30.0
3.1
9.0
8.7
Riffle Slope(ft/ft)
-
0.017
0.027
0.059
0.002
0.005 0.019 0.018
Pool Length (ft)
7.0
13.0
30.0
2.3
4.8
4.7
X5.
Pool Max Depth (ft)
L8
1.9
2.7
1.13
0.9
1.5
L5
Pool Spacing (ft)
-
18.0
39.0
53.0
21.7
12.0
18.0
16.8
Pattern
Channel Belt Width ft
_
_ _ _ _
_ _
21.0
_ _ _ _
_ _
_ 13.4
20.3
22.4
25.6
5.1
6
Radius of Curvature (ft)
18.0
11.0
17.0 12.1
13.4
12.7
16.5
1.8
5
Re: Bankfull Width (ft)
-
- - - -
- -
-
- - - -
- -
- 1.7
1.9
1.8
2.3
0.2
2
Meander Wavelen h fr
-
4�
- - - -
- -
-
- - - -
- -
-18.5
30.0
30.6
38.1
6.6
6
MeandcrWidthRatio
L8
2
1.9
2.9
3.2
3.6
0.7
6
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
-
47%/0%/27%/12%/14/%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
-
4%/2%/49%/38%/1%/6%
d16/135/d50/d84/d95/dip /di-" mm
--/5/6/13/22
14 /36 / 52/110/170/-/-
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib/ft'
0.562
-
Max Part Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
-
947
32
-
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Drain Area mit
0.42
Impervious Cover Estimate (%
Rosgen Classification
114c
B4
B4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
-
-
3.8
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
19.35
G
28.0
19
Valley Length (fl)
-
260.0
485
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
-
625
625
Sinuosity
-
1.50
1.1
1.29
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.024
0.024
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.024
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
-
-
Proportion Over Wide (%)
-
-
Entrenchment Class (ER Range)
Incision Class (BHR Range)
-
-
BEHI
26.67
-
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
-
-
- Information unavailable.
N/A- Item does nota ly.
Non -Applicable

- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Non -Applicable.
Table 10 cont'd. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site - Jerry Branch 3 (636 feet)
Parameter
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
As -Built / Baseline
Dimension&Substrate - Riffle
LL UL Fq.
Min Mean
Med
Max SD
N Min can Med Max
SD N
Min can Max
Min
Mean
Med[33.86.435
DBankfull
Width (ft)
4.95
4.0
1 9.8 11.7 13.1
7.3
7.2
7.3
7.3141
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
6.5
1 16.0 18.0 21
24.7
29.3
29.335
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.78
0.9
1 0.5 0.62 0.8
0.54
0.4
0.4
0.40
2
Bankfull M ax Depth(ft)
1.1
1 0.8 0.9 1.2
0.77
0.8
0.9
0.971
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft'
5A
3.3
1 5.4 7.3 8
4.0
3.0
3.2
3.212
2
Width/Depth Ratio
4.8
1 12.3 18.8 19.6
13.5
16.6
17.2
17.2778
2
Entrenchment Ratio
1.6
1 1.4 1.5 1.8
3.4
3.4
4.0
4.0849
2
Bank Height Ratio
2.9
1 09 I 14
1.0
1.0
1.0.0
2
d50 (mm)
52 _ _
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
1
1 4.0 114.01 130.013.1
1 9.0
1 8.7 26.5
4.5
29
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.017 0.027 0.059
0.002
0.005
0.019
0.018 0.042
0.010
29
Pool Length (ft)
7.0 13.0 30.0
2.3
4.8
4.7 7.8
1.5
31
Pool M ax Depth (ft)
1.8 1.9 2.7
1.15
0.9
1.5
1.5 2.2
0.3
29
Pool Spaemg(ft)
18.0 39.0 53.0
23.9
12.0
18.0
16.8 36.2
5.1
30
Patlern
Channel Belt Width (11)
_
_
_
_ _
_ _ _ _
21.0
_
_
_ _ _
20.0
24.2
26.0
26.5
3.6
3
Radius of Curvature (ft)
18.0 1
12.0 1 1 17.0 1
9.2
12.1
10.6
17.0
2.8
7
Re Bankfull Width(ft)
_
_
_
_ _
_ _ _ _ _
_
_
_ _ _
1.3
1.7
1.5
2.3
0.4
1
Meander Wavelen .l
34.1
43.9
44.8
54.4
8.1
6
Meander Width Ratiol
I I
I
I
I
I I I
I 1 1.8 1 1
1
1
1 1 2
2.7
13.3
3.6
3.6
U
3
Substrate, Bed antlTransportParameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
60%/0%/21%/]0%/9%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
4%/2%/49%/38%/1%/6%
dl 6 / 135 / 150 / d84 I d95/di' /di- mm
--/5/6/13/22
14/36/ 52/110/170/ -/-
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib/ft'
0.562
Max Part Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
947
32
Stream Power (Tmsl, ort Cacit W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Drain Area min
0.42
Impervious Cover Estimate (%
Rosgen Classification
G
B4c
B4
B4
Baakfull Velocity (fps)
3.8
Bankfull Discharge lets)
20.49
28.0
20
Valley Length (ft)
260.0
624
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
670
636
Sinuosity
1.50
1.00
1.02
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0240
0.0235
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0239
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
Proportion Over Wide (%)
Entrenchment Class (ER Range)
-
Incision Class (BHR Range)
BEHI21.3
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Non -Applicable.

- information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Non -Applicable
'This reach limited to visual assessment since it is less than 500 feet
Table 10 cont'd. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site - Hudson Branch (59 feet)
Parameter
Regional Curve Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
As -Built/ Baseline
Dimension&Substrate - Rime
LL
ill. Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD
N n Med Max SD N
Min Mean
Max Min Mean
Med Max SD
N
Bankfall Width (ft)
-
- 2.63 - 4.5
1 7 13.1
7.3
-
Floodprone Width (ft)
8.0
1 0 21
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.49 0.5
1 2 0.8
0.34
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
- 0.7
1 1.2
17.3-
0.52
-
Bankfull Cross Sectional Army 11
2.0 - 2.1 - - -
1 - 8 - -
- 2.1Width/Depth
Ratio
9.5
1 8 19.6
18.7
Entrenchment Ratio
- 1.8
1 1.88Bank
Height Ratio
- 3.6 - - -
1 - 1.4 - -
- -
-
d50 (man)
52
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
- - - - -
- 4.0
14.0 -
30.0 - -
- -
- 8.89
10.2
10.2
11.5 1.86
2
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.017
0.027
0.059
0.003
0.017 0.017 0.017
0.018 0.001
2
Pool Length (ft)
- - - -
7.0
13.0
30.0
5.4
7.33
7.1
9.51 2.07
3
Pool Max Depth (ft)
- - - - -
- 1.8
1.9 -
2.7 - -
- 0.77
- 1.37
1.77
1.82
2.14 0.39
3
Pool Spacing(ft)
18.0
39.0
53.0
15.9
11.5
16.6
16.6
21.8 7.26
2
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
- - - - -
- -
21.0 - - - -
- -
- 10.2
10.2
10.2
10.2 -
I
Radius of Curvature ft
- - - - -
- -
18.0 - - - -
9.0 -
14.0 -
-
-
- -
-
Rc: Bankfull Width ft
_ _ _ _ _
_ _
Meander Wavelength (ft)
-
_
_
-
M sander Width Ratio
_ _ _ _ _
_ _
1.8 _ _ _ _
+_-4M
_ 2
_ 1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4 _
1
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
46%/0%/50%/0%/4%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
-
4%/2%/49%/38%/l%/6%
dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95/dip /di"(man)
-
14/36/ 52/110/170/ -/-
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib/ft2
0.562
Max Part Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
-
947
32
-
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W/n�
-
-
-
Additional Reach Parameters
Drain Area (mi)
0.42
Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
-
-
Rosgen Classification
G
B4c
B4
134
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
3.8
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
7.13 -
28.0
7
Valley Length (ft)
-
260.0
55
EEi"
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
102
59
Sinuosity
-
1.50
1.10
1.08
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0120
0.030
Bankthll Slope (ft/ft)
0.043
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
-
Proportion Over Wide (%)
Entrenchment Class (ER Rauge)
Incision Class (BHR Range)
-
BEHI
Chanel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
-
- information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Non -Applicable
'This reach limited to visual assessment since it is less than 500 feet

- Informationunavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
-Applicabl
'This reach received minor bank work with no adjustments to profile. No cross-sections set in this reach.
Table 10 cont'll. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site - Dale Branch 1 (250 feet)
Parameter
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design As -Built/ Baseline
Dimension&Substrate - Rime
LL
ill. Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD
N Min Mean Med Max SD N Min can Max Min can Med Max SD N
Bankfull Width (ft)
-
- 2.63 4.8
7.1 8.0 8.5 2.0
3 9.8 11.7 - 13.1 - -
6.3 -
Floodprone Width (ft)
7.0
15.0 18.0 20.0 7.0
2 16.0 18.0 - 21 - -
- - -
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.49 0.4
0.5 0.5 0.6 0.1
3 0.5 0.62 0.8
0.34
Bankfirll Max Depth (ft)
0.5
0.6 0.6 0.7 0.1
3 0.8 0.9 1.2
0.52
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft'
2.0 2.5
2.9 2.9 3.4 0.5
3 5.4 7.3 - 8 - -
- 2.1 -
Width/DepthRatio
8.0
18.4 21.4 25.7 9.2
3 12.3 18.8 19.6
18.7
Entrenchment Ratio
1 1.5
1 2.0 2.1 2.5 0.5
3 L4 1.5 1.8
5.6
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.8 1.2 3.l 1.2
3 0.9 1 1.4
d50 (mm)
-
-
52 -
Pratt le
Riffle Length (ft)
-
- - - -
4.0
14.0
30.0
-
-
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
-
- - - -
- 0.017
0.027 -
0.059 -
-
- - -
Pool Length (ft)
7.0
13.0
30.0
Pool Max Depth (ft)
1.8
1.9
2.7
0.77
Pool Sp wing (ft)
-
- - - -
- 18.0
39.0 -
53.0 -
-
- 20.5 -
Pattern
Channel Belt Width fr
21.0
Radius of Curvature (ft)
1
1 18.01
1 1
1 1 9.0 1 1 14.0
Re: Bankfull Width (ft)
-
- - - -
- -
- -
- -
-
- - -
Meander Wavelen h fr
Meander Width Ratio
-
- - - -
- -
1.8 -
- -
-
- 4 -
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
-
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/11 /Be%
4%/2%/49%/38%/1%/6%
d16/135/d50/d84/ 195/dip /di- nm
--/5/6/11/15
14/36/ 52/110/170/ -/-
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib/ft2
0.562
-
Max Part Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
-
947
32
Stream Power Trans ort Ca aci[ W/m2
-
Additional Reach Parameters
Drain Area(mi')
-
0.42
Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
Rosman Classification
C
B4c
B4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
-
-
3.8
-
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
7.13
-
28.0
7
Valley Length (ft)
260.0
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
375
Sinuosity
-
1.50
1.20
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
-
0.0390
Bankthll Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
-
-
Proportion Over Wide (%)
-
-
Entrenchment Class (ER Range)
-
Incision Class (BHRRauge)
-
-
BEHI
25.64
-
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
-
Biological or Other
- Informationunavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
-Applicabl
'This reach received minor bank work with no adjustments to profile. No cross-sections set in this reach.

'Based on average design values for Subreaches 2b -2e
- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Non-pplicab e.
Table 10 cont'd. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site - Dale Branch 2 (920 feet)
Parameter
Regional Curer Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
As-Built/Baseline
Dimension&Substrate - Rime
LL
UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD
N Min Mean
Med MaxSD N
Min Mean
Max Min Mean
Med Max
SD
N
Bankfull Width (ft)
2.98 5.0
1 9.8 11.7
13.1
5.4
6.4
6.7
6.7 7.0
0.42
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
- 7.0
1 16.0 18.0
21
15.1
19.5
19.5 23.9 6.22
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
-
- 0.54 - 0.6 - - -
1 0.5 0.62
- 0.8 - -
- 0.37
- 0.3
0.3
0.3 0.3
0
2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
1 0.8 0.9
1.2
0.56
0.5
0.6
0.6 0.7
0.14
2
Bankfull Crass Sectional Area ft'
2.4 - 2.8
1 5.4 7.3
8
2.0
1.8
1.9
L9 2.0
0.14
2
Width/Depth Ratio
- 9.0 - - -
1 12.3 18.8
- 19.6 - -
- 14.6
- 22.6 23.6 23.6 24.6
1.41
2
Entrenchment Ratio
1.4
1 1.4 1.5
1.8
8.2
2.4
2.9
2.9 3.4
0.71
2
Bank Heigh[ Ratio
7.9
1 0.9 1
1.4
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0.0
2
d50(mm)
52
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
4.0
14.0
30.0
3.2
10.1
9.0
21.3
4.8
28
Riffle Slope (fl/ft)
0.017
0.027
0.059
0.003
0.007 0.027 0.027
0.046 0.011
28
Pool Length (ft)
- - - - -
- 7.0
13.0
-
30.0 - -
- -
- 1.5
3.2
2.9
9.6
1.6
29
Pool Max Depth (ft)
1.8
1.9
2.7
0.84
1.1
1.6
1.4
2.8
0.5
28
Pool Spacing(fi)
18.0
39.0
53.0
20.7
9.4
19.7
19.3
31.4
4.9
28
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
- - - - -
- -
21.0
- - - -
- -
- 18.0 20.6
19.0
24.4
3.1
5
Radius of Curvature(ft)
18.0
10.0
15.0 8.2
13.8
14.7
16.7
3.4
5
Re: Bankfull Width(ft)
_ _ _ _ _
_ _
_ _ _ _
_ _
_ 1.2
2.l
2.2
2.5
0.5
5
Meander Wavelength (ft)
-
- 33.1
38.9 39.6
41.5
3.1
6
Meander Width Ratio
- - - - -
- -
1.8
- - - -
- 4
- 2.7
3.1
2.8
3.6
0.9
6
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
50%/ 7%/ 16%/ 10%/ 17%
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
4%12%149%/38%/l%/6%
dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95/di°/di' mm
--/5/6/11/15
14/36/ 52/110/170/ -/-
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/fir'
0.562
Max Part Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
947
32
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W/m`
Additional Reach Parameters
Drain Area min
0.04
0.,
Impervious Cover Estimate (%
Rosgen Classification
G
B4c34
B4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
3.8
BankfuO Discharge(cfs)
8.77
28.0
9
Valley Length (ft)
-
260.0
896
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
-
-
975
920
Sinuosity
1.50
1.00
1.03
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0420
0.029
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
-
0.028
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
-
-
-
Proportion Over Wide (%)
Entrenchment Class (ER Range)
-
Incision Class (BHR Range)
-
-
BEHI
25.2
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
-
-
'Based on average design values for Subreaches 2b -2e
- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Non-pplicab e.

- Information unavailable.
Pion -Applicable.
Table 10 cont'd. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site - Dale Branch 3 (559 feet)
Parameter
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
As -Built/ Baseline
Dimension&Substrate - Rime
LL
ill. Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD
N Min Mean
Med Max SD N
Min can
Max Min can
Med Max
SD
N
Bankfull Width (ft)
-
- 3.28 3.0
3.3 3.3 3.6 0.4
2 9.8 11.7
13.1
7.3
7.3 7.3
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
9.0
12.0 12.0 15.0 4.2
2 16.0 18.0
- 21 - -
-
18.5
18.5 18.5
-
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.58 0.6
0.7 0.7 0.7 0.1
2 0.5 0.62
0.8
0.3
0.3 0.3
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
0.8 0.8 0.9 0.1
2 0.8 0.9
1.2
0.7
0.7 0.7
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft'
2.8 3.0
3.6 3.6 4.1 0.8
2 5.4 7.3
- 8 - -
-
K22
2.5
2.5 2.5
-
1
Width/Depth Ratio
8.8
10.4 10.4 11.9 2.2
2 12.3 18.8
19.6
21.1
21.1 21.1
1
Entrenchment Ratio
1.5
2.0 2.0 2.5 0.7
2 L4 1.5
1.8
2.5
2.5 2.5
1
Bank Height Ratio
1.6
1.9 1.9 2.2 0.4
2 0.9 1
- 1.4 - -
-
1.0
LO 1.0
-
1
d50 (mm)
52
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
-
4.0
14.0
30.0
0.5
12.6
10.7
60.6
10.9
24
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.017
0.027
0.059
0.008
0.005 0.026 0.025
0.061 0.014
24
Pool Length (ft)
7.0
13.0
30.0
1.3
3.3
2.9
9.0
1.5
23
Pool Max Depth(ft)
-
1.8
1.9
2.7
0.89
0.8
1.3
1.3
1.7
0.2
23
Pool Spacing (ft)
-
- - - -
- 18.0
39.0
-
53.0 - --F-F2-1
9
- 13.3 21.0
18.5
63.1
10.1
23
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
-
- - -
21.0
17.8 1 26.7 1 27.9
1 33.4
1 7.4
1 4
Radius of Curvature (ft)
-
- - - -
- -
18.0
- - - -
11.0 -
16.0 8.7
10.2
9.8
12.1
1.4
6
Rc: Bankfull Width f[
_
_ _ _ _
_ _
_
_ _ _ _
_ _
_ 1.2
1.4
L3
1.7
0.2
1
Meander Wavelen h (ft)
_
_ _ _ _
_ _
_
_ _ _ _
_ _
_ 29.6 39.9 37.4
55.7
10.0
6
Meander Wid[h Ratio
-
- - - -
- -
1.8
- - - -
- 2
- 2.4
1 3.7 1
3.8
4.6
1.0
4
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri% /Ru%/P%/G%/S%
62%/0%/16% /11% /11%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
4%/2%/49%/38%/l%/6%
dl6/05/d50/d84/d95/di' /di'(-)
--/5/6/11/15
14/36/ 52/110/170/ -/-
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib/ftp
-
0.562
-
-
Max Part Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
947
32
Stream Power Trans ort Capacity) W/m'
-
Additional Reach Parameters
Drain Area min
0.05
0.42
Impervious Cover Estimate (%
Rosgen Classification
G
B4c
B4
B4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
-
3.8
Bankfull Discharge(cfs)
10.3
28.0
10
Valley Length (ft)
-
260.0
531
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
-
550
559
Sinuosity
1.50
1.0
1.05
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
-
0.027
0.024
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
-
-
-
0.026
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
-
Proportion Over Wide (%)
-
Entrenchment Class (ER Range)
-
-
Incision Class (BHR Range)
-
BEHI
20.47
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric I-
-
Biological or Otherl
I-
- Information unavailable.
Pion -Applicable.

- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Non -Applicable.
Table 10 cont'll. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site - Dale Branch 4 (835 feet)
Parameter
Regional Curve
Pre-6dditi
sting Conon
Reference Reach Data
Design
As-Built/ Baseline
Dimension&Substrate - Riffle
LL
UL Fq. Min Mean Med Max SD
N MinMean
Med Max SD N
Min Mean
Max in Mean
Med Max
SD
N
Bankfull Width (11)
-
- 4.01 5.5
6.0 6.0 6.5 0.7
2 9.8 11.7
- 13.1 - -
- 6.1
- 6.3
6.4
6.4 6.5 0.14
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
6.5
7.8 7.8 9.0 1.8
2 16.0 18.0
21
22.0
33.1
33.1 44.2
15.7
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
-
- 0.67 0.8
0.8 0.8 0.8 0.0
2 0.5 0.62
0.8
0.47
0.3
0.4
0.4 0.5 0.14
2
Bankfull Max Depth (11)
1.0
1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
2 0.8 0.9
- 1.2 - -
- 0.67
- 0.7
0.8
0.8 0.9 0.14
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft'
3.9 4.1
4.6 4.6 5.0 0.6
2 5.4 7.3
8
2.9
1.9
2.5
2.5 3.1 0.85
2
Width/Depth Ratio
7.3
7.9 7.9 8.4 0.8
2 12.3 18.8
19.6
13.0
13.8
17.4
17.4 21.0 5.09
2
Entrenchment Ratio1.2
1.3 1.3 1.4 0.1
2 1.4 1.5
- 1.8 - -
- 4.1
- 3.5
5.2
5.2 6.8 2.33
2
Bank Height Ratio
3.3
3.5 3.5 3.7 0.3
2 0.9 1
1.4
1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0 1.0
0.0
2
d50 (mm)52
_
_ _ _ _
_ _
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
4.0
14.0
30.0
7.8
17.8
14.5 68.7
12.3
31
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.017
0.027
0.059
0.002
0.003 0.018 0.016 0.048 0.009
31
Pool Length (ft)
-
7.0
13.0
30.0
1.5
3.2
2.9 12.5
2.1
30
Pool Max Depth (ft)
-
- - - -
- 1.8
1.9
-
2.7 -
-
- 1.01
- 0.1
1.4
1.4 2.1
0.3
33
Pool Spacing(ft)
18.0
39.0
53.0
19.6
14.4 26.0 22.2 77.4
13.7
31
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
-
- - - -
-
21-
-
-
- -
- 16.7
18.7
18.0 22.2
2.5
4
Radius of Curvature fr
9.0
14.0 9.3
13.1
13.6 16.4
2.9
6
Re, Bankfull Width (ft)
-
1.4
2.1
2.1 2.6
0.5
2
Meander Wavelen h (ft)
-
- - - -
-
ij!.E
- -
-
- -
- 34.4 45.9 39.9 62.7
12.5
6
M Bander Width Ratio
2
2.6
2.9
2.8 3.5
0.4
4
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
68%/ 00/,/ 1201/ 8%u/ 11 %
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
-
4%/2%/49%/38%/1%/6%
dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95/diP/di'(-)
-45/6/11/15
14/36/ 52/110/170/-/-
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib/ft2
0.562
Max Part Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
947
32
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W/m`
Additional Reach Parameters
Drain Area (mi)
0.08
0.42
Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
Rosgm Classification
G
B4c
B4
B4
Bankfidl Velocity (fps)
-
3.8
Bankfull Discharge(cfs)
14.45
-
28.0
14
Valley Length (ft)
260.0
810
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
825
835
Sinuosity
-
1.50
1.00
1.03
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.028
0.024
Bankfull Slope (ft/fl)
0.020
Bankfull Floodplain Area (aures)
-
-
-
Proportion Over Wide (%)
Entrenchment Class (ER Range)
Incision Class (BHR Range)
-
-
BEHI
24.25
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
-
-
- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Non -Applicable.

'Values taken from Sabreach 51,
- Information unavailable.
Pon -Applicable.
Table 10 cont'd. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site - Dale Branch 5 (679 feet)
Parameter
Regional
Curve
Pre -Fisting Comlition
Reference Reach Data
Design'
As -Built / Baseline
Dimension & Substrate -Rime
Bankfull Width (ft)
LL UL Fq. Min Mean Med Max SD N
- - 4.2 - 8.0 - - - 1
Min Mean Med Max SD N Min Mean
9.8 11.7 - 13.1 - - - 6.4
Max Min Mean
- 7.1 7.1
Med Max
7.1 7.1
SD
-
N
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
BankfullMean Depth (ft)
Bankfull M ax Depth (ft)
- 9.0 - - - 1
- - 0.7 - 0.8 - - - 1
- 1.0 - - - 1
16.0 18.0 - 21 - - -
0.5 0.62 - 0.8 -
0.8 0.9 - 1.2 -
-
0.49
0.69
- 23.9
- 0.5
- 0.7
23.9
0.5
0.7
23.9 23.9
0.5 0.5
0.7 0.7
-
-
-
1
1
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')4.2
- 5.0 - - - l
5.4 7.3 - 8 - - -
3.1
- 3.3
3.3
3.3 3.3
-
1
Width/Depth Ratio
Entrenchment Ratio
- 12.9 - - - 1
- 1.1 - - - 1
12.3 18.8 - 19.6 -
1.4 1.5 - 1.8 -
13.1
3.1
- 15.2
- 3.4
15.2
3.4
15.2 15.2
3.4 3.4
-
-
1
1
Bank Height Ratio
d50 (mm)
- 2.6 - - - l
- - - - - -
0.9 1 - L4 - - -
- 52 - - - -
-
-
- LO
-
1.0
1.0 1.0
-
1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
4.0 14.0 - 30.0 - - -
0.017 0.027 - 0.059 -
7.0 13.0 - 30.0 -
-
0.002
-
- 7.2 18.3 20.3 25.1 6.0
- 0.005 0.022 0.024 0.044 0.011
- 1.8 3.0 3.1 4.0 0.7
11
11
12
Pool M ax Depth (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
1.8 1.9 - 2.7 - - -
18.0 39.0 - 53.0 -
1.04
29.9
- L1
- 12.1
1.5
26.4
1.4 2.2
28.4 35.2
0.4
6.8
ll
11
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Re: Bankfull Width ft
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- 21.0 - - - - -
- 18.0 - - 7.0
- - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
- 1.8 - - -
-
-
-
-
2
- 13.2
12.0 8.7
- 1.2
- 47.9
- 1.9
15.3
14.1
2.0
56.4
2.2
15.6 17.1
15.6 16.7
2.2 2.4
54.8 67.7
2.2 2.4
1.9
3.6
0.5
7.2
0.3
3
4
2
6
3
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/ Ru%/ P%/ G%/ S%
-
-
68% /0%/12%/13%/7%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
-
4%/2%/49%/38%/1%/6%
dl 6 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / diP / div (mm)
--/5/6/11/15
14/36/ 52/110/170/ -/-
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ftr
-
0.562
-
-
M ax Part Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
-
947
32
-
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W/m2
-
-
-
Additlonal Reach Parameters
Drains Area mit
0.09
0.42
Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
-
-
Rosgen Classification
F
134c
134
134
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
- -
3.8
-
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
15.73 -
28.0
16
Valley Length (ft)
-
260.0
695
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
-
-
725
679
Sinuosity
-
1.50
1.0
0.977
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
-
-
0.023
0.024
Bmkfull Slope (ft/ft)
-
-
-
0.024
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
-
-
-
Proportion Over Wide (%)
-
-
Entrenchment Class (ER Range)
-
-
Incision Class (BHR Range)
-
-
BEHI
23.1
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
-
-
Biological or Other
-
-
'Values taken from Sabreach 51,
- Information unavailable.
Pon -Applicable.

- Information unavailable.
Ron -Applicable.
Table 10 con't. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site - Thompson Branch 1 (530 feet)
Parameter
Regional Curve
Pre-Ddsting Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
As-Built/ Baseline
Dimension&Substrate -Rifne
LL fJI, Eq.
Min Mr.. Med Max SD N
Min Mean Med Max SD N Min
Min Mean
Med Max
SD
N
Bankfull Width (ft)
- - 4.6
- 5.0 1
9.8 11.7 - 13.1
-
Floodprone Width (ft)
- 20.0 - - - 1
16.0 18.0 - 21.0 - - -
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
- - 0.7
- 1.0 - - - 1
0.5 0.6 - 0.8 - - -
BankfullMaxDepth(ft)
- 1.3 1
0.8 0.9 1.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
4.8
- 4.6 - - - 1
5.4 7.3 - 8.0 - - -
J4.2-
Width/DepthRatio
- 5.5 - - - 1
12.3 18.8 - 19.6 - - -
Entrenchment Ratio
- - - -
4.0 1
1.4 1.5 L8
- - - -Bank
Height Ratio
- - -
- 12 1
- - - -
0.9 1.0 L4
d50 (mm)
- - - - - -
- 52
- -
- -
-
-
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
-
4.0 14.0 30.0
44.7 44.7 44.7 44.7
1
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
- - - - - -
0.017 0.027 - 0.059 - - -
-
- 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006
-
1
Pool Length (ft)
- - - - - -
7.0 13.0 - 30.0 - - -
-
- 9.6 20.6
17.0 35.0
11.6
6
Pool Max Depth(ft)
1.8 1.9 2.7
1.1
1.6 2.0
1.9 2.3
0.3
7
Pool Spacing (11)
-
18.0 39.0 53.0
28.6
11.0 22.3
18.3 36.5
11.2
6
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
- -
21.0 - - - - -
-
22.9 36.4
9.1
3
Radius of Curvature ft
-18.0
13.0
13.2 13.7
0.7
3
Re: Bankfull Width ft
- -
ja
- - - - - -
-
A19.0
1.5 1.6
0.1
l
Meander Wavelen h (ft)
- -
- - - - - -
-
81.4 155.2 44.0
4
MeanderWidthRatio1.8
- - - - -
3
2.6 4.1
1.0
3
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
-
-
25%/0%/69%/0%/6%
SC%/Sa% G%/C%/B%/Bel.
-
4%/2%/49%/38%/1%/6%
dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95/di/ di'r mon
4/6/8 /15/24
14/36/ 52/110/170/-/-
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft2
-
0.562
-
-
M ax Part Size (mm) M obilized at Bankfull
-
947
37
-
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area min
0.11
0.42
Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
-
-
Rosgen Classification
G
B4c
B4
B4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
-
-
3.8
-
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
18.2
-
28.0
18
Valley Length (ft)
-
260.0
294
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
511
530
Sinuosity
-
1.50
1.0
1.06
Water Surface Slope (B/ft)
-
-
0.030
0.031
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.030
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
-
-
-
Proportion Over Wide (%)
-
-
Entrenchment Class (ER Range)
-
-
Incision Class (BHR Range)
-
BEHI30.9
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
-
-
Biological or Other
-
- Information unavailable.
Ron -Applicable.

- Information wravailable.
Non-Applicabl .
Table 10 cont'd. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site - Thompson Branch 2 (1,061 feet)
Parameter
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
As -Built/ Baseline
Dimension&Substrate - Riffle
LL UL Eq.
Min Mean Med Max SD N
Min Mean
Med
Max SD N
Min Mean
Med Max
SD N
Bankfull Width (ft)
- - 5.11
7.0 7.7 7.0 9.0 1.2 3
9.8 11.7
13.1 -
7.5
7.6
7.6 7.6
0.07 2
Floodprone Width (ft)
9.0 14.7 15.0 20.0 5.5 2
16.0 18.0
-
21.0 - -
31.1
32.7
32.7 34.3
2.26 2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
- - 0.8
0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 0.1 3
0.5 0.6
-
0.8 - -
0.6
0.6
0.6 0.6
0 2
Bankfull MaxDepth(ft)
1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 0.1 3
0.8 0.9
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.2 1.2
0.07 2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
5.6
5.7 6.7 6.0 8.4 1.5 3
5.4 7.3
-
8.0 - -
jMean
4.2
4.3
4.3 4.3
0.07 2
Width/Depth Ratio
8.1 8.8 8.5 9.7 0.8 3
12.3 18.8
-
19.613.3
13.4
13.4 13.4
0.07 2
Entrenchment Ratio
1.3 2.0 1.7 2.9 0.8 3
1.4 1.5
1.8
4.1
4.3
4.3 4.5
0.28 2
Bank Height Ratio
1.4 2.2 2.4 2.9 0.8 3
0.9 1.0
1.41.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0.0 2
d50 (mm)
- - - - - -
52
-Profrle
Riffle Length (ft)
-
4.0 14.0
30.0
10.0
15.8
15.2 25.4
3.9 32
Riffle Slope (fl/fi)
- - - - - -
0.017 0.027
- 0.059 - - -
0.008
- 0.005 0.014 0.013 0.023 0.005 32
Pool Length (ft)
- - - - - -
7.0 13.0
- 30.0 - - -
-
- 1.8
5.0
4.6 18.3
3.0 32
Pool M as, Depth (ft)
- - - - - -
1.8 1.9
- 2.7 - - -
1.17
- 1.4
2.1
2.0 2.6
0.3 32
Pool Sp wing (It)
- - - - - -
18.0
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
- - - - - -
- 21.0
- -
- 14.4 22.4
19.5 37.8
8.2 6
Radius of Curvature ft
18.0
18.0 10.5
18.3
18.5 25.9
6.7 4
Re: Bankfull Width (ft)
-
J_*3
1.4
2.4
2.5 3.5
0.9 2
Meander Wavelength (ft)
- - - - - -
-
- -
- 34.3
48.7
50.5 60.9
9.8 6
MeanderWidthRatio
- -
- 1.8
- -
- 2.2
3.0
2.6 4.1
1.0 3
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
-
-
57%/0%/18%/11%/14%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
-
4%/2%/49%/38%/1%/6%
dl 6/ d35/ 150/ d84/ d95/dip /di'p mm
4/6/8/15/24
14/36/ 52/110/170/ -/-
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib/ftr
-
0.562
-
Mas Part Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
-
947
37
-
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W/m2
-
Additional Reach Parameters
Drain Area min
0.14
0.42
Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
-
-
Rosgen Classification
G
134c
B4
134
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
-
-
3.8
-
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
21.6
-
28.0
22
Valley Length (ft)
-
260.0
1,010
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,150
1,061
Sinuosity
-
1.50
1.1
1.05
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
-
-
0.020
0.020
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.022
0.022
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
-
-
-
Proportion Over Wide (%)
-
-
Entrenchment Class (ER Range)
-
-
Incision Class (BHR Range)
-
BEHI
29.8
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
-
-
Biological or Other
- Information wravailable.
Non-Applicabl .

Reach 3
Cross -Section 5
Pool
Reach 3
Cross -Section 6
Riffle
Reach 3
Cross -Section 7
Riffle
Base I MY1 I MY2 I MY3 I MY4 I MY5 I MY6 I MY7 I Base I MY1 I MY2 I MY3 I MY4 I MY5 I MY6 I MY7 I Base I MY1 I MY2 I MY3 I MY4 I MY5 I MY6 I MY7
Record elevation (datum) used
301.7
1301.7
301.7 1301.7
L
ppendix D. Table Ila. - Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site - Jerry Branch
298.8 1298.8
1298.8
1
1 290.2 1290.2
290.2
1290.2
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.1
Reach 1
Cross -Section 1
Pool
Reach 1
Cross -Section 2
Riffle
9.4
7.4
Reach 2
Cross -Section 3
Pool
7.3
6.9
7.2
Reach 2
Cross -Section 4
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5 MY6 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY6 MY7 Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Record elevation (datum) used
320.1
320.1
320.1
320.1
319.6 319.6 319.6 319.6 312.9
312.9
312.9
312.9
310.6
310.6
310.6
310.6
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.1
8.3
8.3
8.2
8.1 7.0 6.7 6.9 7.8
8.1
8.1
9.8
7.1
7.2
7.2
7.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
>25
>25
>25
>25
>30 >30 >30 >30 >30
>30
>30
>30
>25
>25
>25
>25
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.5 0.3 0.4 0.4 1.1
1.0
1.1
1.0
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.7
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.0 0.5 0.6 0.6 2.3
2
2.2
2.1
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
8.5
6.8
6.9
6.6
3.7 2.4 2.6 2.7 8.3
7.7
8.7
9.4
3.1
3.0
2.7
2.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.8
10.1
9.9
10.1
17.7 20.3 17.5 17.6 7.4
8.4
7.6
10.2
16.4
17
19.4
22.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio'
>2.7
>3.0
>3.0
N/A
>3.7 >4.3 >4.5 4.0 >3.8
>3.7
>3.7
N/A
>3.5
>3.5
>3.5
3.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
d50 (mm)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A 0.2 0.062 12.0 N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
22
5.2
12.0
Reach 3
Cross -Section 5
Pool
Reach 3
Cross -Section 6
Riffle
Reach 3
Cross -Section 7
Riffle
Base I MY1 I MY2 I MY3 I MY4 I MY5 I MY6 I MY7 I Base I MY1 I MY2 I MY3 I MY4 I MY5 I MY6 I MY7 I Base I MY1 I MY2 I MY3 I MY4 I MY5 I MY6 I MY7
Record elevation (datum) used
301.7
1301.7
301.7 1301.7
1
1298.8
298.8 1298.8
1298.8
1
1 290.2 1290.2
290.2
1290.2
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.1
9.2
9.7
9.4
7.4
7.5
7.3
6.9
7.2
6.7
6.4
6.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
>25
>25
>25
>25
>30
>30
>30
>30
>25
>25
>25
>25
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.8
1.3
1.3
1.4
0.9
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
7.9
6.3
6.8
6.9
3.3
3.3
2.9
2.4
3.0
2.3
2.4
2.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.3
13.3
13.7
13.0
16.6
16.7
18.7
19.4
17.7
19.4
17.0
17.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio'
>3.1
>2.7
>2.6
N/A
>4.1
>4.0
>4.1
4.4
>3.4
>3.7
>3.9
4.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
d50 (mm)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5.5
14.0
52.0
N/A
34.0
15.0
27.0
N/A - Information Not Available
I MYO Bankfull Entrennchment Ratios Updated to Reflect Calculated Values

Appendix D. Table Ila. cont'd - Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site - Dale Branch
Reach 2
Reach 2
Reach 2
Reach 2
Cross-Section 8
Cross-Section 9
Cross-Section 10
Cross-Section 11
Riffle
Pool
Riffle
Pool
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY6 MY7 Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY6 MY7 Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Record elevation (datum) used 354.94 354.94 354.94 354.94
354.7
354.7
354.7
354.7
348.1
348.1
348.1
348.1
347.4
347.4
347.4
347.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
7.0
7.3
7.2
6.5
7.7
8.0
8.1
7.7
6.4
6.2
6.2
6.5
7.6
8
8.3
9.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
>25
>25
>25
>25
>25
>25
>25
>25
>25
>25
>25
>25
>20
>20
>20
>20
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6 1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.7
1.5
1.7
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
1.6
1.2
1.3
1.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
2.0
1.7
2.0
1.6
4.8
4.8
5.0
5
1.8
1.6
1.7
1.8
6.1
5.9
6.0
6.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
24.6
30.6
26.0
26.9
12.3
13.5
13.3
11.8
22.6
23.7
21.7
23.4
9.5
10.9
11.5
13.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio'
>3.6
>3.4
>3.5
3.9
>3.1
>3.1
>3.1
N/A
>3.9
>4.0
>4.1
3.9
>2.6
>2.5
>2.4
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
d50 (mm)
N/A
8.0
8.3
7.1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
19
4.3
25.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Reach 3
Reach 3
Reach 4
Reach 4
Cross-Section 12
Cross-Section 13
Cross-Section 14
Cross-Section 15
Riffle
Pool
Pool
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY6 MY7 Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY6 MY7 Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Record elevation (datum) used
327.8
327.8
327.8
327.8
326.1
326.1
326.1
326.1
315.3
315.3
315.3
315.3
314.1
314.1
314.1
314.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
7.3
7.1
7.1
7.8
7.8
7.6
7.7
8.3
6.7
7.2
7.0
5.8
6.5
6.2
6.5
6.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
>20
>20
>20
>20
>20
>20
>20
>20
>30
>30
>30
>30
>40
>40
>40
>40
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.9
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
0.6
0.8
0.8
1.3
1.1
1.0
0.9
2.0
1.0
1.3
1.3
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
2.5
2.2
2.7
3.1
3.9
3.5
3.0
3.7
6.2
4.3
5.2
4.9
3.1
2.9
3.0
3.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
21.1
23.1
18.7
19.3
15.7
16.7
19.7
18.5
7.1
12.1
9.5
7.0
13.8
13.2
14.2
14.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio'
>2.8
>2.8
>2.8
2.6
>2.6
>2.6
>2.6
N/A
>4.5
>4.2
>4.3
N/A
>6.1
>6.5
>6.2
5.9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 (mm)
N/A
2.1
4.4
1 8.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
16.0
5.8
12.0
Reach 4
Reach 5
Reach 5
Cross-Section 16
Cross-Section 17
Cross-Section 18
Riffle
Riffle
Pool
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY6 MY7 Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY6 MY7
Record elevation (datum) used
303.5
303.5
303.5
303.5
286.8
286.8
286.8
286.8
286.6
286.6
286.6
286.6
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.3
7.2
7.6
6.7
7.1
7.9
7.9
9.1
7.2
8.0
7.7
7.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
>25
>25
>25
>25
>25
>25
>25
>25
>25
>25
>25
>25
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.8
1.7
1.5
1.4
1.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
1.9
2.3
2.7
2.2
3.3
3.8
3.9
4.1
5.9
5.8
5.6
5.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
21.0
23.0
20.9
19.9
15.2
16.2
16.3
20.6
8.7
11.0
10.7
10.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio'
>4.0
>3.5
>3.3
3.8
>3.5
>3.2
>3.2
2.7
>3.5
>3.1
>3.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
d50 (mm)N/A
26.0
4.7
1 16.0
N/A
1 33.0
16.0
32.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A - Information Not Available
1 MYO Bankfull Entrennchment Ratios Updated to Reflect Calculated Values
Appendix D. Table Ila. cont'd - Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site -Thompson Branch
Reach 2
Cross-Section 19
Pool
Reach 2
Cross-Section 20
Riffle
Reach 2
Cross-Section 21
Pool
Reach 2
Cross-Section 22
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6
MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY6 MY7 Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Record elevation (datum) used
364.1
364.1
364.1
364.1
363.2 363.2 363.2 363.2 356.0
356.0
356.0
356.0
356.0
356.0
356.0
356.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.4
9.2
9.2
7.8
7.5 7.7 7.6 8.4 8.6
9.1
9.2
10.2
7.6
7.7
7.7
7.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
>30
>30
>30
>30
>30 >30 >30 >30 >30
>30
>30
>30
>30
>30
>30
>30
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
0.9
1 0.8
1.0
0.6 1 0.6 0.6 1 0.6 1.0
0.8 1
0.8
0.8
1 0.6 1
0.6
0.6
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.1
1.7
1.5
1.5
1.2 0.9 0.9 0.9
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
8.8
8.1
7.0
7.7
4.2 4.4 4.4 4.8
7.5
7.8
8
4.3
4.4
4.4
4.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.0
10.4
12.1
8.0
13.3 13.5 13.0 14.5
MNA
10.9
10.9
12.9
13.4
13.5
13.5
13.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio'
>3.6
>3.3
>3.3
N/A
>4.0 >3.9 >3.9 3.6
>3.3
>3.2
N/A
>3.9
>3.9
>3.9
3.9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 (mm)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A 0.2 9.9 47.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
29.0
30.0
53.0
N/A - Information Not Available
1 MYO Bankfull Entrennchment Ratios Updated to Reflect Calculated Values

N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri=Riffle/Ru=Run/P=Pool/G=Glide/S=Step
Table 11b cont'd. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site - Je rryBranch 2 625 feet
Table 11b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Pee Dee Stream Restoration - erry Branch 1 430 feet
Parameter
Baseline
Baseline
MY -1
MY -1
MY -2
MY -2
I MY -3
MY -3
Dimension&Substrate - Riffle
MY -4 MY -5 MY -6 MY -7
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle
Min Mean Med Max
SD
n
Min Mean Med
Max
SD
n
Min Mean Med
Max
SD
n
Min Mean Med Max
SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width ft
8.1
8.1
8.1 8.1
N/A
1
7.0
7.0
7.0
7.0
N/A
1
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.7
N/A
1
6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9
N/A
1
Flood rove Width ft
31.8
31.8
31.8 31.8
N/A
1
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
N/A
1
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
N/A
1
30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0
N/A
1
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.5
0.5
0.5 0.5
N/A
1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
N/A
1
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
N/A
1
0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
N/A
1
BankfullMax Depth (ft)
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
N/A
1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
N/A
1
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
N/A
1
0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
N/A
1
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area(ft)
3.7
3.7
3.7 3.7
N/A
1
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
N/A
1
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.6
N/A
1
2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7
N/A
1
Width/Depth Ratio
17.7
17.7
17.7 17.7
N/A
1
20.3
20.3
20.3
20.3
N/A
1
17.5
17.5
17.5
17.5
N/A
1
17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6
N/A
I
Entrenchment Ratio
3.9
3.9
3.9 3.9
N/A
1
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
N/A
1
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
N/A
1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
3.1
9.0
8.7 26.5
4.5
29
Riffle Length ft
2.6
6.2
6.2 16.4
2.8
26
Riffle Slope(11/ft)
0.005 0.019 0.018 0.042 0.010
29
Riffle Slope ft/ft
0.001 0.010 0.009 0.026
0.0
26
2.3
4.8
4.7 7.8
1.5
31
Pool Length ft
2.3
5.9
5.4 16.0
2.9
26
1.5 2.2
0.3
29
PoolMaxD th ft
0.7
1.5
1.5 2.3
0.4
26
30
Pattern
Pool Spacing ft
6.1
15.0
14.2 27.8
5.1
25
Channel Belt Width ft
13.4
20.3
Patte rn
5.1
6
Radius of Curvature(ft)
12.1
13.4
12.7 16.5
Channel Belt Width ft
14.0
19.2
19.2 24.4
7.3
2
Re: Bankfull Width ft/ft
1.70
1.9
1.8 2.3
0.2
2
Radius of Curvature (ft)
11.6
13.6
13.1 16.5
2.2
4
Meander Wavelength(ft)
18.5
30.0
30.6 38.1
6.6
6
Re: Bankfull Width ft/ft
1.4
1.7
1.6 2.0
0.3
2
Meander Width Ratio
1.9
2.9
3.2 3.6
0.7
6
Meander Wavelength ft
23.8
44.4
47.1 55.0
11.9
6
Meander Width Ratio
1.7
2.4
2.4 3.0
0.9
2
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
625
Additional Reach Parameters
Sinuosity ft
1.29
Ros n Classification
B4
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.024
Channel Thalweg Length ft
430
Bankfull Slope ft/ft
0.024
Sinuosity ft
1.06
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S% 47% 1
0%
27% 12%
14%
Water Surface Sloe Channel(ft/ft)
0.0265
Bankfull Slope ft/ft
0.0267
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S% 42%
1 0%
40% 1 7% 1
11% 11
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri=Riffle/Ru=Run/P=Pool/G=Glide/S=Step
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri = Riffle / Ru = Run / P = Pool / G = Glide / S = Step
Table 11b cont'd. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site - Je rryBranch 2 625 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY -1
MY -2
I MY -3
MY -4 MY -5 MY -6 MY -7
Dimension&Substrate - Riffle
Min Mean Med Max
SD
n
Min Mean Med
Max
SD
n
Min Mean Med
Max
SD
n Min Mean Med Max
SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width ft
7.1
7.1
7.1 7.1
N/A
1
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.2
N/A
1
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.2
N/A
1 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7
N/A
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
16.0
16.0
16.0 16.0
N/A
1
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
N/A
1
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
N/A
1 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0
N/A
1
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.4
0.4
0.4 0.4
N/A
1
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
N/A
1
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
N/A
1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
N/A
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
0.7
0.7 0.7
N/A
1
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
N/A
1
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
N/A
1 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
N/A
1
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area ft
3.1
3.1
3.1 3.1
N/A
1
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
N/A
1
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
N/A
1 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6
N/A
1
Width/Depth Ratio
16.4 1
16.4
1 16.41 16.4 1
N/A I
1
1 17.0
1 17.0 1
17.0
17.0
1 N/A I
1
1 19.4 1
19.4
1 19.41
19.4 1
N/A I
1 1 22.6 122.6 1 22.6 22.6
N/A
1
Entrenchment Ratio
2.3
2.3
2.3 2.3
N/A
1
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
N/A
1
3.5
3.5
1 3.5
3.5
N/A
1 3.2 3.2 3.2 1 3.2
1 N/A
1
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
N/A
1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
1 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9
N/A
I
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
3.1
9.0
8.7 26.5
4.5
29
Riffle Slope(11/ft)
0.005 0.019 0.018 0.042 0.010
29
Pool Length ft
2.3
4.8
4.7 7.8
1.5
31
Pool Max De th(ft)
0.9
1.5
1.5 2.2
0.3
29
Pool Spacing ft
12.0
18.0
16.8 36.2
5.1
30
Pattern
Channel Belt Width ft
13.4
20.3
22.4 25.6
5.1
6
Radius of Curvature(ft)
12.1
13.4
12.7 16.5
1.8
5
Re: Bankfull Width ft/ft
1.70
1.9
1.8 2.3
0.2
2
Meander Wavelength(ft)
18.5
30.0
30.6 38.1
6.6
6
Meander Width Ratio
1.9
2.9
3.2 3.6
0.7
6
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
B4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
625
Sinuosity ft
1.29
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.024
Bankfull Slope ft/ft
0.024
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S% 47% 1
0%
27% 12%
14%
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri = Riffle / Ru = Run / P = Pool / G = Glide / S = Step

Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
20.0
24.2
26.0 26.5
3.6
3
Radius of Curvature ft
9.2
12.1
Table 11b cont'd. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site - Je Branch 3 636 feet
Parameter
7
Pool .
Baseline
1.7
1.5 2.3
0.4
2
MY- 1
34.1
43.9
44.8 54.4
8.1
MY - 2 MY -3
Meander Width Ratio
MY -4 MY - 5 MY -6 MY -7
Dimension & Substrate -Riffle
Min Mean Med
Max
SD
n
Min Mean Med
Max
SD
n
Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max
SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width ft
7.2
7.3
7.3
7.4
0.1
2
6.7
7.1
7.1
7.5
0.6
2
6.4
6.9
6.9 7.3 0.6 2 6.2 6.6 6.6 6.9
0.5
2
Floodprone Width(ft)
24.7
29.3
29.3
33.8
6.4
2
25.0
27.5
27.5
30.0
3.5
2
25.0
27.5
27.5 30.0 3.5 2 25.0 27.5 27.5 30.0
3.5
2
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.0
2
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.1
2
0.4
0.4
0.4 0.4 0.0 2 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
0.0
2
Bankfull Max Depth ft
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.1
2
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.1
2
0.5
0.6
0.6 0.6 0.0 2 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6
0.1
2
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area ftZ
3.0
3.2
3.2
3.3
0.2
2
2.3
2.8
2.8
3.3
0.7
2
2.4
2.6
2.6 2.9 0.3 2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.4
0.1
2
Width/Depth Ratio
16.6
17.2
17.2
17.7
0.8
2
16.7
18.1
18.1
19.4
1.9
2
17.0
17.9
17.9 18.7 1.2 2 17.4 18.4 18.4 19.4
1.4
2
Entrenchment Ratio
3.4
4.0
4.0
4.6
0.8
2
3.7
1 3.9
1 3.9
4.0
0.2
2
3.9
4.0
4.0 4.1 0.1 2 4.0 4.2 4.2 4.4 1
0.3
1 2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
2
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
0.0
2
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0 0.0 2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1
0.0
1 2
Profile
3.8
3.8
4.1
0.4
2
3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9
0.0
2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0.0
2
1.0
1.0
1.0
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
20.0
24.2
26.0 26.5
3.6
3
Radius of Curvature ft
9.2
12.1
10.6 17.0
2.8
7
Pool .
1.3
1.7
1.5 2.3
0.4
2
34.1
43.9
44.8 54.4
8.1
6
Meander Width Ratio
2.7
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
20.0
24.2
26.0 26.5
3.6
3
Radius of Curvature ft
9.2
12.1
10.6 17.0
2.8
7
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
1.3
1.7
1.5 2.3
0.4
2
Meander Wavelength (ft)
34.1
43.9
44.8 54.4
8.1
6
Meander Width Ratio
2.7
3.3
3.6 3.6
0.5
3
Additional Reach Parameters
SD
n
Min Mean Med
Max
SD
Rosgen Classification
Min Mean Med
Max
B4
n
Min Meanj Med I Max
SD
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Bankfull Width ft
6.4
636
6.7 7.0
0.4
2
Sinuosity (ft)
6.8
6.8
1.02
0.8
2
6.2
Water Surface Slope Channel) ft/ft)
6.7
7.2
0.0235
2
6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5
0.0
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Floodprone Width ft
15.1
0.0239
19.5 23.9
6.2
2
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S% 1
60% 1
0%
21% 1 10% 1
9%
2
25.0
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri - Riffle / Ru - Run / P - Pool / G - Glide / S - Step
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri=Riffle /Ru=Run/P=Pool/G=Glide/S=Step
Table llb contd. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site - Dale Branch 2 920 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY -1
MY -2
MY -3
MY- 4 MY- 5 MY -6 MY- 7
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle
Min Mean Med Max
SD
n
Min Mean Med
Max
SD
n
Min Mean Med
Max
SD
n
Min Meanj Med I Max
SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width ft
6.4
6.7
6.7 7.0
0.4
2
6.2
6.8
6.8
7.3
0.8
2
6.2
6.7
6.7
7.2
0.7
2
6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5
0.0
2
Floodprone Width ft
15.1
19.5
19.5 23.9
6.2
2
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
0.0
2
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
0.0
2
25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0
0.0
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.3
0.3
0.3 0.3
0.0
2
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.1
2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.0
2
0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3
0.1
2
Bankf ill Max Depth (ft)
0.5
0.6
0.6 0.7
0.1
2
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.0
2
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.0
2
0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6
0.1
2
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area(ft).
1.8
1.9
1.9 2.0
0.1
2
1.6
1.7
1.7
1.7
0.1
2
1.7
1.9
1.9
2.0
0.2
2
1.6 1.7 1.7 1.8
0.1
2
Width/Depth Ratio
22.6
23.6
1 23.6 1 24.6 1
1.4 1
2
1 23.7
27.2
27.2
30.6
4.9 1
2
21.7
23.9
23.9
26.0
3.0
2
23.4 25.2 25.2 26.9
2.5
2
Entrenchment Ratio
2.4
2.9
2.9 3.4
0.7
2
3.3
3.7
3.7
4.0
0.5
2
3.5
3.8
3.8
4.1
0.4
2
3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9
0.0
2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0.0
2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
2
0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9
0.0
2
Profile
Riffle Length ft
3.2
10.1
9.0 21.3
4.8
28
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.007 0.027 0.027 0.046 0.011
28
Pool Length (ft)
1.5
3.2
2.9 9.6
1.6
29
Pool MaxDep th ft
1.1
1.6
1.4 2.8
0.5
28
Pool Spacing (ft)
9.4
19.7
19.3 31.4
4.9
28
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
18.0
20.6
19.0 24.4
3.1
5
Radius of Curvature ft
8.2
13.8
14.7 16.7
3.4
5
Rc: Bankfull Width ft/ft
1.2
2.1
2.2 2.5
0.5
5
Meander Wavelength (ft)
33.1
38.9
39.6 41.5
3.1
6
Meander Width Ratio
2.7
3.1
2.8 3.6
0.9
6
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
B4
Channel Thalweg Length ft
920
Sinuosity (ft)
1.03
Water Surface Slope (Channel) ft/ft
0.029
Bankfull Slope ft/ft
0.028
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
50% 1
7%
1 16% 1 10%
17%
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri=Riffle /Ru=Run/P=Pool/G=Glide/S=Step

N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri=Riffle/Ru=Run/P=Pool/G=Glide/S=Step
Table 11b contd. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site - Dale Branch 3 559 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY -1
MY -2
MY -3
MY -4 MY -5 MY -6 MY -7
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle
Min Mean Med Max
SD
n
Min Mean Med
Max
SD
n
Min Mean Med
Max
SD
n
Min Mean Med Max
SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width ft
7.3
7.3
7.3 7.3
N/A
1
7.1
7.1
7.1
7.1
N/A
1
7.1
7.1
7.1
7.1
N/A
1
7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8
N/A
1
Floodprone Width ft
18.5
18.5
18.5 18.5
N/A
1
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
N/A
1
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
N/A
1
20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
N/A
1
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.3
0.3
0.3 0.3
N/A
1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
N/A
1
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
N/A
1
0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
N/A
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
0.7
0.7 0.7
N/A
1
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
N/A
1
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
N/A
1
0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
N/A
1
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
2.5
2.5
2.5 2.5
N/A
1
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
N/A
1
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
N/A
1
3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1
N/A
1
Width/De th Ratio
21.1
21.1
21.1 21.1
N/A
1
23.1
23.1
23.1
23.1
N/A
1
18.7
18.7
18.7
18.7
N/A
1
19.3 19.3 19.3 19.3
N/A
1
Entrenchment Ratio
2.5
2.5
2.5 2.5
N/A
1
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
N/A
1
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
N/A
1
2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6
N/A
1
Bank Height t Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
N/A
1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
1
0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
N/A
1
Profile
Riffle Length ft
0.5
12.6
10.7 60.6
10.9
24
Riffle Slope ft/ft
Riffle Slope ft/ft
0.005 0.026 0.025 0.061 0.014
24
Pool Length (ft)
1.5
Pool Length ft
1.3
3.3
2.9 9.0
1.5
23
Pool Max Depth (ft)
0.1
1.4
Pool Max Depth (ft)
0.8
1.3
1.3 1.7
0.2
23
Pool Spacing (ft)
14.4
26.0
22.2 77.4
Pool Spacing (ft)
13.3
21.0
18.5 63.1
10.1
23
Pattern
Pattern
Channel Belt Width(ft)
16.7
18.7
18.0 22.2
2.5
Channel Belt Width ft
17.8
26.7
27.9 33.4
7.4
4
Radius of Curvature ft
9.3
13.1
13.6 16.4
2.9
6
Radius of Curvature (ft)
8.7
10.2
9.8 12.1
1.4
6
Re: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
1.4
2.1
2.1 2.6
0.5
2
Re: Bankfull Width ft/ft)
1.2
1.4
1.3 1.7
0.2
1
Meander Wavelength ft
34.4
45.9
39.9 62.7
12.5
6
Meander Wavelength ft
29.6
39.9
37.4 55.7
10.0
6
Meander Width Ratio
2.6
2.9
2.8 3.5
0.4
4
Meander Width Ratio
2.4
3.7
3.8 4.6
1.0
4
Additional Reach Parameters
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
134
Rosgen Classification
B4
Channel Thalweg Length ft
835
Channel Thalweg Length ft
559
Sinuosity ft
1.03
Sinuosity ft
1.05
Water Surface Sloe Channel ft/ft
0.024
Water Surface Sloe Channel ft/ft
0.024
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.020
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.026
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S% 68%
F 0%
1 #### 1 8% 1
11%
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S% 62%
1 0%
1 16% 1 11%
11%
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri=Riffle/Ru=Run/P=Pool/G=Glide/S=Step
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru= Run /P= Pool /G= Glide /S=Step
Table llb contd. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site - Dale Branch 4 835 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY -1
MY -2
MY -3
MY -4 MY- 5 MY- 6 MY -7
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle
Min Mean Med Max
SD
n
Min Mean Med
Max
SD
n
Min Mean Med
Max
SD
n
Min Mean Med Max
SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.3
6.4
6.4 6.5
0.1
2
6.2
6.7
6.7
7.2
0.7
2
6.5
7.0
7.0
7.6
0.7
2
6.7 6.8 6.8 6.8
0.1
2
Floodprone Width ft
22.0
33.1
33.1 44.2
15.7
2
25.0
32.5
32.5
40.0
10.6
2
25.0
32.5
32.5
40.0
10.6
2
25.0 32.5 32.5 40.0
10.6
2
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft)
0.3
0.4
0.4 0.5
0.1
2
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.1
2
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.1
2
0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5
0.1
2
Bankfull Max Depth ft
0.7
0.8
0.8 0.9
0.1
2
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.1
2
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.0
2
0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8
0.1
2
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
1.9
2.5
1 2.5 3.1
0.8
2
2.3
2.6
2.6
2.9
0.4
2
2.7
2.9
2.9
3.0
0.2
2
2.2 2.7 2.7 3.2
0.7
2
Width/Depth Ratio
13.8
17.4
1 17.41 21.0 1
5.1 1
2
1 13.2
18.1
18.1
23.0
6.9
2
14.2
17.5
17.5
20.9
4.7
2
14.7 17.3 17.3 19.9
3.7
2
Entrenchment Ratio
3.5
5.25.2
6.8
2.3
2
3.5
4.9
4.9
6.2
1.9
2
3.3
4.7
4.7
6.2
2.0
2
3.8 4.9 4.9 5.9
1.5
2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0.0
2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
2
0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0
0.1
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
7.8
17.8
14.5 68.7
12.3
31
Riffle Slope ft/ft
0.003 0.018 0.016 0.048 0.009
31
Pool Length (ft)
1.5
3.2
2.9 12.5
2.1
30
Pool Max Depth (ft)
0.1
1.4
1.4 2.1
0.3
33
Pool Spacing (ft)
14.4
26.0
22.2 77.4
13.7
31
Pattern
Channel Belt Width(ft)
16.7
18.7
18.0 22.2
2.5
4
Radius of Curvature ft
9.3
13.1
13.6 16.4
2.9
6
Re: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
1.4
2.1
2.1 2.6
0.5
2
Meander Wavelength ft
34.4
45.9
39.9 62.7
12.5
6
Meander Width Ratio
2.6
2.9
2.8 3.5
0.4
4
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
134
Channel Thalweg Length ft
835
Sinuosity ft
1.03
Water Surface Sloe Channel ft/ft
0.024
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.020
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S% 68%
F 0%
1 #### 1 8% 1
11%
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru= Run /P= Pool /G= Glide /S=Step

N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri=Riffle/Ru=Run/P=Pool/G=Glide/S=Step
contd.Table llb Monitoring 1, Data Summary
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site - Thompson Branch 1 (530 feet)
Table 11b contd. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site - Dale Branch 5 679 feet
Parameter
Baseline
'::'•- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
MY -1
-•-. aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
MY -2
MY -3
MY -4 MY -5 MY -6 MY -7
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle
Min Mean Med Max
SD
n
Min Mean Med
Max
SD
n
Min Mean Med
Max
SD
n
Min Mean Med Max
SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width ft
7.1
7.1
7.1 7.1
N/A
1
7.9
7.9
7.9
7.9
N/A
1
7.9
7.9
7.9
7.9
N/A
1
9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1
N/A
1
Floodprone Width ft
23.9
23.9
23.9 23.9
N/A
1
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
N/A
1
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
N/A
1
25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0
N/A
1
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.5
0.5
0.5 0.5
N/A
1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
N/A
1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
N/A
1
0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
N/A
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
0.7
0.7 0.7
N/A
1
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
N/A
1
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
N/A
1
0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
N/A
1
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
3.3
3.3
3.3 3.3
N/A
1
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
N/A
1
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
N/A
1
4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1
N/A
1
Width/Depth Ratio
15.2
15.2
15.2 15.2
N/A
1
16.2
16.2
16.2
16.2
N/A
1
16.3
16.3
16.3
16.3
N/A
1
20.6 20.6 20.6 20.6
N/A
1
Entrenchment Ratio
3.4
3.4
3.4 3.4
N/A
1
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
N/A
1
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
N/A
1
2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7
N/A
1
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
N/A
1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
1
1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
N/A
1
Profile
Riffle Length ft
7.2
18.3
20.3 25.1
6.0
11
Riffle Slope ft/ft
0.005 0.022 0.024 0.044 0.011
11
Pool Length ft
1.8
3.0
3.1 4.0
0.7
12
Pool Max Depth (ft)
1.1
1.5
1.4 2.2
0.4
11
Pool Spacing (ft)
12.1
26.4
28.4 35.2
6.8
11
Pattern
Channel Belt Width ft
13.2
15.3
15.6 17.1
1.9
3
Radius of Curvature (ft)
8.7
14.1
15.6 16.7
3.6
4
Re: Bankfull Width ft/ft)
1.2
2.0
2.2 2.4
0.5
2
Meander Wavelength ft
47.9
56.4
54.8 67.7
7.2
6
Meander Width Ratio
1.9
2.2
2.2 2.4
0.3
3
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
B4
Channel Thalweg Length ft
679
Sinuosity ft
0.977
Water Surface Sloe Channel ft/ft
0.024
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)0.024
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S% 68%
1 0%
1 12% 1 13% 1
7%
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri=Riffle/Ru=Run/P=Pool/G=Glide/S=Step
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru= Run /P= Pool /G= Glide /S=Step
contd.Table llb Monitoring 1, Data Summary
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site - Thompson Branch 1 (530 feet)
' aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
'::'•- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
-•-. aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.
Bankfull Daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Bankfull � aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Width/Depth Ratio aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Entrenchment •'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
-=•.'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Pool Max Depth (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Channel Belt Width (ft)
Ratio
AdditionalWidth
Parameters
•,.
_
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
I
1.
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru= Run /P= Pool /G= Glide /S=Step

N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri=Riffle/Ru=Run/P=Pool/G=Glide/S=Step
Table 11b contd. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Pee Dee Stream Restoration Site - Thom son Branch 2 (1,061 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY -1
MY -2
MY -3
MY -4 MY -5 MY -6 MY -7
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle
Min Mean Med Max
SD
n
Min Mean Med
Max
SD
n
Min Mean Med
Max
SD
n
Min Meanj Med I Max
SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width ft
7.5
7.6
7.6 7.6
0.1
2
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.7
0.0
2
7.6
7.7
7.7
7.7
0.1
2
7.8 8.1 8.1 8.4
0.4
2
Floodprone Width ft
31.1
32.7
32.7 34.3
2.3
2
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
0.0
2
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
0.0
2
30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0
0.0
2
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.6
0.6
0.6 0.6
0.0
2
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.0
2
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.0
2
0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
0.0
2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.1
1.2
1.2 1.2
0.1
2
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.1
2
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.1
0.1
2
0.9 1.0 1.0 1.1
0.1
2
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
4.2
4.3
4.3 4.3
0.1
2
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
0.0
2
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
0.0
2
4.4 4.6 4.6 4.8
0.3
2
Width/Depth Ratio
13.3
13.4
13.4 13.4
0.1
2
13.5
13.5
13.5
13.5
0.0
2
13.0
13.3
13.3
13.5
0.4
2
13.8 14.2 14.2 14.5
0.5
2
Entrenchment Ratio
4.1
4.3
4.3 4.5
0.3
2
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
0.0
2
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
0.0
2
3.6 3.8 3.8 3.9
0.2
2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 1 1.0
0.0
2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
2
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
0.0
2
Profile
Riffle Length ft
10.0
15.8
15.2 25.4
3.9
32
Riffle Slope ft/ft
0.005 0.014 0.013 0.023 0.005
32
Pool Length ft
1.8
5.0
4.6 18.3
3.0
32
Pool Max Depth (ft)
1.4
2.1
2.0 2.6
0.3
32
Pool Spacing (ft)
19.5
27.5
25.9 54.0
7.4
32
Pattern
Channel Belt Width ft
14.4
22.4
19.5 37.8
8.2
6
Radius of Curvature (ft)
10.5
18.3
18.5 25.9
6.7
4
Re: Bankfull Width ft/ft)
1.4
2.4
2.5 3.5
0.9
3
Meander Wavelength ft
34.3
48.7
50.5 60.9
9.8
6
Meander Width Ratio
2.2
3.0
2.6 4.1
1.0
3
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgm Classification
B4
Channel Thalweg Length ft
1,061
Sinuosity ft
1.05
Water Surface Sloe Channel ft/ft
0.020
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.022
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S% 57%
1 0%
1 18% 1 11% 1
14%
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri=Riffle/Ru=Run/P=Pool/G=Glide/S=Step

Upstream
Downstream
323
322.5
Pee Dee - Jerry Branch 1 - Cross Section 1 - Pool
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
9.1
8.3
..
c
Flood rove Width (ft)
25.0
Upstream
Downstream
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
323
322.5
Pee Dee - Jerry Branch 1 - Cross Section 1 - Pool
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
9.1
8.3
322
321.5
8.2
Flood rove Width (ft)
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
_
321
0.8
0.8
c
320.5
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1.3
-
15
'y
320
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
8.5
M
319.5
6.6
Width/Depth Ratio
9.8
319
9.9
10.1
Entrenchment Ratio
318.5
3.0
3.0
N/A
318
1.0
1.0
1.0
317.5
317
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Distance (ft)
Baseline -MY1 MY2 MY3 Approx. Bankfull
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
9.1
8.3
8.3
8.2
Flood rove Width (ft)
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.7
1.3
1.2
1.2
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
8.5
6.8
6.9
6.6
Width/Depth Ratio
9.8
10.1
9.9
10.1
Entrenchment Ratio
2.7
3.0
3.0
N/A
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
322
Pee Dee - Jerry Branch 1 - Cross Section 2 - Riffle
MY2
321.5
Bankf it Width ft
8.1
7.0
321
6.9
Flood rove Width ft
30.0
320.5
30.0
30.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.5
0.3
0.4
0
m
m
320
319.5 - -
- - - - - - - - - - - --
0.5
0.6
319
Bankf ill Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
3.7
2.4
318.5
2.7
Width D th Ratio
17.720.3
318
317.5
17.5
17.6
Entrenchment Ratio
0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Distance (ft)
4.5
4.0
Baseline MY1 MY2 -MY3 App... Ban kfull
1.0
1 1.0
1.0
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankf it Width ft
8.1
7.0
6.7
6.9
Flood rove Width ft
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.5
0.3
0.4
0.4
BankfullMax Depth ft
1.0
0.5
0.6
0.6
Bankf ill Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
3.7
2.4
2.6
2.7
Width D th Ratio
17.720.3
17.5
17.6
Entrenchment Ratio
3.7
4.3
4.5
4.0
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1 1.0
1.0
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width ft
7.8
8.1
8.1
9.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.0
BankfullMax Depth ft
2.3
2.0
2.2
2.1
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
8.3
7.7
8.7
9.4
Width/Depth Ratio
7.4
8.4
7.6
10.2
Entrenchment Ratio
3.8
3.7
3.7
N/A
Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
313.5
Pee Dee - Jerry Branch 2 - Cross Section 4 - Riffle
MY2
313
Bankful Width ft
7.1
7.2
312.5
7.7
Floodprone Width ft)
25.0
312
25.0
25.0
Bankf ill Mean Depth ft
0.4
0.4
0.4
0
311.5
0.7
0.6
m
m
311
_ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
3.1
3.0
310.5
2.6
Width/Depth Ratio
16.4
310
19.4
22.6
Entrenchment Ratio
309.5
309
3.5
3.5
3.2
0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Distance (ft)
1.0
1.0
Baseline MY1 MY2 -MY3 App... Ban kfull
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width ft
7.1
7.2
7.2
7.7
Floodprone Width ft)
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
Bankf ill Mean Depth ft
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
BankfullMax Depth ft
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
3.1
3.0
2.7
2.6
Width/Depth Ratio
16.4
17.0
19.4
22.6
Entrenchment Ratio
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9

Upstream
Downstream
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
305.5
Pee Dee - Jerry Branch 3 - Cross Section 5 - Pool
MY2
305
Bankful Width ft
8.1
9.2
304.5
9.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
Bankf ill Mean Depth ft
304
303.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
303
-000
1.3
1.3
302.5
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
7.9
cPOW
6.8
6.9
Width/D th Ratio
5
302
301.5 - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
13.0
M
301
2.7
2.6
N/A
300.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
300
299.5
299
298.5
0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Distance (ft)
Baseline MY1 MY2 -MY3 App... Ban kfull
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width ft
8.1
9.2
9.7
9.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
Bankf ill Mean Depth ft
1.0
0.7
0.7
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.8
1.3
1.3
1.4
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
7.9
6.3
6.8
6.9
Width/D th Ratio
8.3
13.2
13.7
13.0
Entrenchment Ratio
3.1
2.7
2.6
N/A
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
301.5
Pee Dee - Jerry Branch 3 - Cross Section 6 - Riffle
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width ft
7.4
301
7.3
6.9
300.5
300
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
Bankf ill Mean Depth ft
0.4
c
299.5
299
� _
BankfullMax Depth ft
5
- -
298.5
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
0.6
m
3.3
3.3
2.9
2.4
298
16.6
16.719.4
297.5
297
Entrenchment Ratio
4.1
4.0
296.5
4.4
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Distance (ft)
1.0
Baseline MY1 MY2 -MY3 App... Ban kfull
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
WO
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width ft
7.4
7.5
7.3
6.9
Floodprone Width ft)
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
Bankf ill Mean Depth ft
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
BankfullMax Depth ft
0.9
0.6
0.6
0.6
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
3.3
3.3
2.9
2.4
Width/Depth Ratio
16.6
16.719.4
Entrenchment Ratio
4.1
4.0
4.1
4.4
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
294.5
Pee Dee - Jerry Branch 3 - Cross Section 7 - Riffle
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 YIY7
Bankful Width ft
7.2
6.7
294
293.5
6.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
25.0
293
25.0
25.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.4
292.5
292
0.8
0.5
0.5
291.5
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
3.0
c
0
Tia
2.4
2.2
Width/Depth Ratiol
17.7
291
290.5
17.0
17.4
MO
290 - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
3.9
4.0
Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0
289.5
289
288.5
288
0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Distance (ft)
Baseline MY1 MY2 -MY3 App... Bankfull
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 YIY7
Bankful Width ft
7.2
6.7
6.4
6.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.4
Bankfull Max Depth ft
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
3.0
2.3
2.4
2.2
Width/Depth Ratiol
17.7
1 19.4
17.0
17.4
Entrenchment Ratio 1
3.4
1 3.7
3.9
4.0
Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0
1 0.9

Upstream
Downstream
Pee Dee - Dale Branch 2 - Cross Section 8 - Riffle
358
MYO
MYl
MY2
357.5
Bankful Width ft
7.0
357
356.5
Sk
6.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
25.0
25.0
356
c
25.0
Bankf ill Mean Depth ft
355.5
0.2
0.3
m355
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
0.7
354.5
0.5
0.5
354
353.5
2.0
1.7
353
1.6
Width/Depth Ratiol
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Distance (ft)
Baseline MY1 MY2 -MY3 App... Ban kfull
26.0
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width ft
7.0
7.3
7.2
6.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
Bankf ill Mean Depth ft
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.2
BankfullMax Depth ft
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
2.0
1.7
2.0
1.6
Width/Depth Ratiol
24.630.6
26.0
26.9
Entrenchment Ratio
3.6
3.4
3.5
3.9
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9

Upstream
Downstream
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
358
Pee Dee - Dale Branch 2 - Cross Section 9 - Pool
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width ft
7.7
357.5
357
8.1
7.7
356.5
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
Bankf ill Mean Depth ft
0.6
0.6
356
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth ft
w
355.5
355
1.7
1.5
c
0
io
4.8
4.8
5.0
5.0
354.5
354
12.3
13.5
M
353.5
Entrenchment Ratio
3.3
3.1
3.1
N/A
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
353
1.0
N/A
352.5
352
351.5
0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Distance (ft)
Baseline MY1 MY2 -MY3 Approx. Bankfull
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width ft
7.7
8.0
8.1
7.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
Bankf ill Mean Depth ft
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.7
1.5
1.7
1.5
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
4.8
4.8
5.0
5.0
Width/Depth Ratio
12.3
13.5
13.3
11.8
Entrenchment Ratio
3.3
3.1
3.1
N/A
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A

Upstream
i F�Vli
.1- ��•'���"ice
s
Downstream
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
Pee Dee - Dale Branch 2 - Cross Section 10 - Riffle
MY2
351
Bankful Width ft
6.4
6.2
6.2
6.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
350.5
25.0
25.0
25.0
350
0.3
0.3
0.3
349.5
BankfullMax Depth ft
0.5
0.5
349
0.6
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
c
0
1.6
1.7
1.8
Width/Depth Ratio
348.5
23.7
21.7
23.4
- - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
4.0
m348
3.9
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
347.5
347
346.5
346
0
5 10 15 20 25
Distance (ft)
Baseline MY1 -MY2 -MY3 App... Ban kfull
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width ft
6.4
6.2
6.2
6.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
Bankf ill Mean Depth ft
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
BankfullMax Depth ft
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
1.8
1.6
1.7
1.8
Width/Depth Ratio
22.6
23.7
21.7
23.4
Entrenchment Ratio
3.9
4.0
4.1
3.9
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9

Upstream
Downstream
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
351.5
Pee Dee - Dale Branch 2 - Cross Section 11 - Pool
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width ft
7.6
351
8.3
350.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
350
20.0
349.5
349
20.0
Bankf ill Mean Depth ft
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
348.5
348
1.6
1.2
a
Ti
1.3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
6.1
>
347.5 _ _ _
347
-- -- - __ _
_ ---- -- -- "" _ _"'
Width/Depth Ratio
9.5
0.91I
13.3
Entrenchment Ratio
346.5
346
2.5
2.4
N/A
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
345.5
345
344.5
344
0
5 10 15 20 25 30
Distance (ft)
Baseline MY1 MY2 -MY3 App... Ban kfull
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width ft
7.6
8.0
8.3
9.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
Bankf ill Mean Depth ft
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.6
1.2
1.3
1.3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
6.1
5.9
6.0
6.7
Width/Depth Ratio
9.5
0.91I
13.3
Entrenchment Ratio
2.6
2.5
2.4
N/A
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A

Upstream
F-..
MYO
Pee Dee - Dale Branch 3 - Cross Section 12 - Riffle
MY2
330.5
Bankful Width ft
l
7.1
7.1
7.8
hFs•5
'- . ;'��ej FYI.
�,
<�5;;::_
a'.'• ,.�' �'• �.
20.0
329.5
0.3
0.3
0.4
329
BankfullMax Depth ft
0.7
Downstream
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
Pee Dee - Dale Branch 3 - Cross Section 12 - Riffle
MY2
330.5
Bankful Width ft
7.3
7.1
7.1
7.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
330
20.0
20.0
20.0
329.5
0.3
0.3
0.4
329
BankfullMax Depth ft
0.7
0.6
0.8
V
328.5
_
2.2
c
3.1
Width/Depth Ratio
21.1
23.1
328
19.3
Entrenchment Ratio
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.6
Mw
327.5
1.0
1.0
0.5
327
326.5
326
325.5
0
5 10 15 20 25 30
Distance (ft)
Baseline MY1 MY2 -MY3 App... Ban kfull
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width ft
7.3
7.1
7.1
7.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
Bankf ill Mean Depth ft
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
BankfullMax Depth ft
0.7
0.6
0.8
0.8
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
2.5
2.2
2.7
3.1
Width/Depth Ratio
21.1
23.1
18.7
19.3
Entrenchment Ratio
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.6
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.5

Upstream
Downstream
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
329.5
Pee Dee - Dale Branch 3 - Cross Section 13 - Pool
MY2
329
328.5
328
Bankful Width ft
7.8
327.5
327
7.7
326.5
Floodprone Width ft)
c
0
20.0
20.0
20.0
Bankf ill Mean Depth ft
326 - - -
325.5
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
0.4
MO
325
1.3
1.1
1.0
0.9
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
3.9
3.5
324.5
3.7
Width/Depth Ratio
15.7
324
19.7
18.5
Entrenchment Ratio
323.5
323
2.6
2.6
N/A
0
5 10 15 20 25 30
Distance (ft)
1.0
1.0
Baseline MY1 MY2 -MY3 App... Ban kfull
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width ft
7.8
7.6
7.7
8.3
Floodprone Width ft)
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
Bankf ill Mean Depth ft
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.3
1.1
1.0
0.9
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
3.9
3.5
3.0
3.7
Width/Depth Ratio
15.7
16.7
19.7
18.5
Entrenchment Ratio
2.6
2.6
2.6
N/A
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width ft
6.7
7.2
7.0
5.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
Bankf ill Mean Depth (ft)
0.9
0.6
0.7
0.8
Bankfull Max Depth ft
2.0
1.0
1.3
1.3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
6.2
4.3
5.2
4.9
Width D th Ratio
7.1
12.1
9.5
7.0
Entrenchment Ratio
4.5
4.2
4.3
N/A
Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
316.5
Pee Dee - Dale Branch 4 - Cross Section 15 - Riffle
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width ft
6.5
6.2
316
6.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
40.0
315.5
315
40.0
40.0
cto
0
314.5
-
-
- - - - - - - - ' - - - - ' - - --- - - - - - - - ' - ' - -
0.5
.5
314
313.5
0.9
0.8
Mw
0.8
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
3.1
2.9
313
3.2
WidthMepth Ratio
13.8
312.5
312
14.2
14.7
Entrenchment Ratio
311.5
6.5
6.2
5.9
0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance (ft)
1.0
1.0
Baseline MY1 MY2 -MY3 App... Ban kfull
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width ft
6.5
6.2
6.5
6.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
Bankf ill Mean Depth ft
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
BankfullMax Depth ft
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
3.1
2.9
3.0
3.2
WidthMepth Ratio
13.8
13.2
14.2
14.7
Entrenchment Ratio
6.1
6.5
6.2
5.9
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
306
Pee Dee - Dale Branch 4 - Cross Section 16 - Riffle
MY2
305.5
Bankful Width ft
6.3
7.2
305
6.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
25.0
304.5
25.0
25.0
Bankf ill Mean Depth ft
0.3
0.3
0.4
O
304
0.7
0.6
m
ED
303.5
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
1.9
2.3
303
2.2
Width/Depth Ratio
21.0
302.5
20.9
19.9
Entrenchment Ratio
302
301.5
3.5
3.3
3.8
0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Distance (ft)
1.0
1.0
Baseline MY1 MY2 -MY3 App... Ban kfull
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width ft
6.3
7.2
7.6
6.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
Bankf ill Mean Depth ft
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
BankfullMax Depth ft
0.7
0.6
0.7
0.7
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
1.9
2.3
2.7
2.2
Width/Depth Ratio
21.0
23.0
20.9
19.9
Entrenchment Ratio
4.0
3.5
3.3
3.8
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9

tr. l
, :ki
%w.
Upstream
Downstream
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
290
Pee Dee - Dale Branch 5 - Cross Section 17 - Riffle
MY2
289.5
Bankful Width ft
7.1
7.9
289
9.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
25.0
288.5
25.0
25.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
288
0.5
0.5
0.4
287.5
0.7
0.8
c
°
0.8
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
3.3
'm
287
_ _
WidthMepth Ratio
M
286.5
16.3
20.6
Entrenchment Ratio
286
3.2
3.2
2.7
285.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
285
284.5
284
0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Distance (ft)
Baseline MY1 -MY2 -MY3 App... Bankfull
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width ft
7.1
7.9
7.9
9.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
BankfullMax Depth ft
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.8
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
3.3
3.8
3.9
4.1
WidthMepth Ratio
15.2
16.2
16.3
20.6
Entrenchment Ratio
3.5
3.2
3.2
2.7
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.2

Upstream
Downstream
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
290
Pee Dee - Dale Branch 5 - Cross Section 18 - Pool
MY2
289.5
Bankful Width ft
7.2
8.0
289
7.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
Bankf ill Mean Depth ft
288.5
288
0.7
0.7
0.7
287.5
1.7
1.5
1.4
287
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
5.9
c
- -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Width/Depth Ratio
8.7
286.5
286
10.7
10.4
10
3.5
3.1
3.2
N/A
285.5
285
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
284.5
284
283.5
283
0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Distance (ft)
Baseline MY1 MY2 -MY3 App... Ban kfull
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width ft
7.2
8.0
7.7
7.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
Bankf ill Mean Depth ft
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.7
1.5
1.4
1.4
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
5.9
5.8
5.6
5.3
Width/Depth Ratio
8.7
11.0
10.7
10.4
Entrenchment Ratio
3.5
3.1
3.2
N/A
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
368
Pee Dee - Thompson Branch 2 - Cross Section 19 - Pool
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width ft
8.4
367.5
367
9.2
7.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
30.0
30.0
30.0
366.5
366
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
0.9
0.8
1.0
Bankfull Max Depth ft
2.1
365.5
365
1.5
1.5
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
8.8
8.1
7.0
7.7
364.5
- -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
10.4
>
364
363.5
Entrenchment Ratio
3.6
3.3
3.3
N/A
Bank Height Ratio 1
M
363
362.5
1.0
N/A
362
361.5
361
360.5
360
0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Distance (ft)
Baseline MY1 MY2 -MY3 App... Ban kfull
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width ft
8.4
9.2
9.2
7.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
0.9
0.8
1.0
Bankfull Max Depth ft
2.1
1.7
1.5
1.5
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
8.8
8.1
7.0
7.7
Width/D th Ratio
8.0
10.4
12.1
8.0
Entrenchment Ratio
3.6
3.3
3.3
N/A
Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
FT.
r.e
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
366.5
Pee Dee - Thompson Branch 2 - Cross Section 20 - Riffle
MY2
366
365.5
365
364.5
364
Bankful Width (ft)
7.5
7.7
363.5_____
8.4
Floodprone Width ft
4
m
30.0
- - - - - -
30.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
363
0.6
0.6
p
362.5
362
1.2
0.9
0.9
0.9
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
4.2
4.4
361.5
4.8
Width/Depth Ratio
13.3
361
360.5
13.014.5
Entrenchment Ratio
360
3.9
3.9
3.6
0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Distance (ft)
1.0
1.0
Baseline MY1 -MY2 -MY3 Approx. Bankfull
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
7.5
7.7
7.6
8.4
Floodprone Width ft
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.2
0.9
0.9
0.9
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
4.2
4.4
4.4
4.8
Width/Depth Ratio
13.3
1 13.5
13.014.5
Entrenchment Ratio
4.0
3.9
3.9
3.6
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
359.5
Pee Dee - Thompson Branch 2 - Cross Section 21 - Pool
MY2
359
358.5
358
357.5
357
Bankful Width (ft)
8.6
9.1
9.2
w
4
356.5
356
30.0
30.0
m
355.5
355
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.0
0.8
0.8
0.8
Bankfull Max Depth ft
2.3
354.5
354
1.7
1.6
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
8.5
7.5
7.8
8.0
353.5
353
8.7
1 10.910.9
352.5
Entrenchment Ratio
3.5
3.3
352
N/A
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Distance (ft)
N/A
Baseline MY1 -MY2 -MY3 Approx. Bankfull
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
8.6
9.1
9.2
10.2
Floodprone Width ft
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.0
0.8
0.8
0.8
Bankfull Max Depth ft
2.3
1.7
1.7
1.6
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
8.5
7.5
7.8
8.0
Width/Depth Ratio
8.7
1 10.910.9
12.9
Entrenchment Ratio
3.5
3.3
3.2
N/A
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Pee Dee - Thompson Branch 2 - Cross Section 22 - Riffle
359
358
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width ft
7.6
7.7
7.7
7.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
Bankf ill Mean Depth ft
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth ft
357
c
0 356
M
1.0
1.1
1.1
�-
4.3
4.4
4.4
4.4
Width/Depth Ratio
13.4
13.5
355
13.8
Entrenchment Ratio
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
354
353
1.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Distance (ft)
Baseline MY1 MY2 -MY3 App... Bankfull
DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width ft
7.6
7.7
7.7
7.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
Bankf ill Mean Depth ft
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.1
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)
4.3
4.4
4.4
4.4
Width/Depth Ratio
13.4
13.5
13.5
13.8
Entrenchment Ratio
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0

Table 12. Pebble Count Data Summary
Charts 1-9. MY3 Stream Reach Substrate Composition Charts
Chart 1.
90%
80%
70% -
60% —
50% —
40%
30%
I
20%
10%
0% '
Silt/Clay Sand
Pee Dee MY3 Substrate Composition
Gravel
Cobble
■JB1 ■JB2 ■1B3 I DB2 ■ DB3 ■ DB4 ■ DB5 ■TB2
Boulder Bedrock
MY - 2015
MY2 - 2016
MY3 - 2017
MY4 - 2018
MY5 - 2019
MY6 - 2020
MY7 - 2021
Stream Reach
Pebble Count
Pebble Count
Pebble Count
Pebble Count
Pebble Count
Pebble Count
Pebble Count
D50 (nffn)
D84 (inm)
D50 (mnl)
D84 (mrn)
D50 (nIM)
D84 (�)
/
D50 lnlrn)
D84 (mm)
/
D50 1nirn)
D84 (mm)
D50 (nirn)
D84 (mm)
D50 (nirn)
D84 (nirn)
Jerry Branch 1
0.2
34
0.062
5.2
12
58
Jerry Branch 2
22
44
5.2
9.6
12
30
Jerry Branch 3
20
44
15
51
40
76
Dale Branch 2
14
45
6.3
32
16
51
Dale Branch 3
2.1
13
4.4
30
8
80
Dale Branch 4
21
44
5
37
14
71
Dale Branch 5
33
60
16
41
32
69
Thompson Branch 2
1 15
1 51
1 20
1 51
1 50
1 95
Charts 1-9. MY3 Stream Reach Substrate Composition Charts
Chart 1.
90%
80%
70% -
60% —
50% —
40%
30%
I
20%
10%
0% '
Silt/Clay Sand
Pee Dee MY3 Substrate Composition
Gravel
Cobble
■JB1 ■JB2 ■1B3 I DB2 ■ DB3 ■ DB4 ■ DB5 ■TB2
Boulder Bedrock

Chart 2.
70%
60%
50%
Jerry Branch 1 - Substrate Composition
40% M M —
30%
20%
100%
0%
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
■ MY1 ■ MY2 MY3
Chart 3.
Jerry Branch 2 - Substrate Composition
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0% ■ —
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
■ MY1 ■ MY2 ■ MY3

Chart 4.
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Chart 5.
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
1
Silt/Clay
II
Silt/Clay
Jerry Branch 3 - Substrate Composition
In
Sand
Gravel Cobble Boulder
■ MY1 ■ MY2 MY3
Dale Branch 2 - Substrate Composition
1
Sand
Bedrock
Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
■ MY1 ■ MY2 MY3

Chart 6.
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Silt/Clay
Chart 7.
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
.1
Silt/Clay
Dale Branch 3 - Substrate Composition
L
Sand
Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
■ MY1 ■ MY2 MY3
Dale Branch 4 - Substrate Composition
,o
„
M.
Sand
Gravel
Cobble
■ MY1 ■ MY2
MY3
Boulder Bedrock

Chart 8.
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
Dale Branch 5 - Substrate Composition
20%
10%
0%
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
■ MY1 ■ MY2 MY3
Chart 9.
Thompson Branch 2
- Substrate Composition
80%
70%
60%
50%
—
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
— —
Silt/Clay
Sand Gravel
Cobble Boulder Bedrock
■ MY1
■ MY2 MY3

Table 13. Pee Dee Bank Pin Array Summary
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Bank Pin Location Position Reading (mm) Reading (mm) Reading (mm)
Cross Section 1
Upstream
0.0
0.0
0.0
At Cross Section
0.0
0.0
0.0
Downstream
0.0
6.35
0.00
Cross Section 5
Upstream
0.0
0.0
0.0
At Cross Section
0.0
0.0
0.0
Downstream
0.0
0.0
0.0
Cross Section 13
Upstream
0.0
0.0
0.0
At Cross Section
0.0
0.0
0.0
Downstream
0.0
0.0
0.0
Cross Section 18
Upstream
0.0
0.0
0.0
At Cross Section
19.1
0.0
0.0
Downstream
0.0
0.0
0.0
Cross Section 19
Upstream
12.7
0.0
0.0
At Cross Section
6.4
19.05
0.0
Downstream
0.00
19.05
0.0
Cross Section 21
Upstream
0.0
0.0
0.0
At Cross Section
0.0
0.0
0.0
Downstream
0.0
50.8
0.0

Appendix E
Hydrology Data

Table 14. Verification of Bankfull Events
Reach
Method
Number of
Bankfull Events
Maximum Bankfull
Height (ft.)
Jerry Branch
Crest Gauge
0
N/A
Dale Branch
Crest Gauge
0
N/A
Thompson Branch
Crest Gauge
1
0.4
Photo Verification of Bankfull Events
Crest Gauge @ Thompson Branch — 0.4 ft. (Est. Date of Occurrence: 6/5/2017)

Table 15. 2017 Rainfall Summary
Month
Average
Normal Limits
30 Percent 70 Percent
Station
Precipitation
On -Site Auto
Rain Gauage
January
4.07
2.74
4.87
1.30
3.82
February
3.41
2.47
4.03
1.40
1.42
March
4.28
3.05
5.07
2.77
1.77
April
3.15
1.86
3.82
3.40
4.12
May
3.61
2.54
4.28
6.13
2.62
June
4.34
2.56
5.27
4.58
1.21
July
4.84
3.08
5.83
2.48
1.51
August
4.50
2.89
5.42
1.85
1.59
September
4.48
2.26
5.48
2.97
1.30*
October
3.75
2.19
4.53
---
---
Novem ber
3.34
1.98
4.05
---
---
December
3.66
2.52
4.35
---
---
Total
47.43
30.14
57.00
26.88
18.06
*On-site rain data reported up until September 20, 2017
Note: Station Data up until June 2017 from NCCRONOS Uwharrie (Troy) station then the NCCRONOS
Albemarle 5.1 SSE station. Normal Limits and Average data provided by the NRCS Jackson Springs
WETS Table.

Chart 10. 2017 Precipitation Data for Pee Dee Site
2017 Precipitation Data for Pee Dee Site
1U
9
B
7
t 5
U
5
O
�
•U 4
. -
N
L
a
3
-
-------
1
0
Jan Feb Mar
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Months
1� Station wily Rain Fall
On- ti Auto Rain Gauge — Monroe Monthly Rainfall – – – – 301hf701h Percentile