20120747 Ver 1_Year 4 Monitoring Report 2017_20180212

MONITORING YEAR 4
ANNUAL REPORT
Final
DEVIL'S RACETRACK MITIGATION SITE
Johnston County, NC
NCDEQ Contract 003989
DMS Project Number 95021
USACE Action ID Number 2012-00810
NCDWR Project Number 12-0747
Data Collection Period: March - November 2017
Draft Submission Date: December 19, 2017
Final Submission Date: February 12, 2018
PREPARED FOR:
INC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652

WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
February 12, 2018
Jeff Schaffer
N.C. Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
RE: Monitoring Year 4 Report for Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (95021)
Neuse River Basin — CU# 03020201
Johnston County, North Carolina
Contract No. 003989
Dear Mr. Schaffer,
We have reviewed the comments on the Monitoring Year 4 Report for the above referenced project
dated January 11, 2018 and have revised the report based on these comments. The revised documents
are submitted with this letter. Below are responses to each of your comments. For your convenience,
the comments are reprinted with our response in italics.
1) The digital data and drawings received on December 21, 2017 have been reviewed and determined
to meet DMS requirements.
2) Add the USACE Action ID number (2012-00810) and NCDWR Project number (12-0747) to the cover
page.
The USACE Action 1D number and NCDWR Project Number were added to the cover page.
3) Executive Summary. First paragraph states that the project proposes to provide 18,216 SMUs. DMS
calculated SMUs at 18,215.10 in excel and 18,215 from WEI'S electronic submittal of Table 1. Please
change to 18,215 SMUs. LJ
rip
The SMUs have been changed to 18,215 in the Executive Summary.. V11-, ""
'10
4) Table of Contents: Fix page numbers for Sections 1 through 3.= FEB 20?$
Page numbers for Sections 1 through 3 have been fixed.El''l.ti l ,- fig_
WIT'GATJQN SERVICES
5) Section 1, page 1-1, last paragraph state that the project provides 18,216 SMUs. DMS calculated
SMUs at 18,215.10 in excel and 18,215 from WEI'S electronic submittal of Table 1. Please change to
18,215 SMUs.
The SMUs have been changed to 18,215 in Section 1.
WWildlands Engineering, Inc. (P) 919.851.9986 • 312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225 • Raleigh, NC 27609

WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
6) Section 1.2.6
a) First paragraph, page 1-4: In the first sentence, you state that all but one gauge (GW32) are
within the wetland restoration zones. Based on the CCPV and conversations in the field, GW8 is
also outside the wetland restoration zones. This also conflicts with the sentence referenced in
comment 6.b. below. Please correct.
This sentence was updated to state that two gauges (GW8, and GW32) are outside of wetland
restoration zones.
b) Top of Page 1-5 the report states that two of the 13 gauges that failed to meet success criteria
are outside of the wetland boundaries. DMS assumes these are GW8 and GW32, but please
state which gauges you are referring to, and explain why they are being monitored.
At the top of page 1-5 GW8 and GW32 were added to the text to clarify that these are the two
wells that were placed outside of the wetland boundaries. At the beginning of section 1.2.6 an
explanation is given as to why these two wells were placed outside of wetland boundaries and
that they will be removed in subsequent monitoring years.
c) 12 of the 21 gauges that failed to meet the wetland hydrologic success criteria of 8.5% for MY 4
also failed to meet success criteria in MY 3 after meeting in MY 2. In many cases there was a
drastic drop in hydrology from MY 2 to MY 3. Specifically gauges 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 14, 20, 23, 24, 30,
32, and 38. Please explain in detail within the report narrative what has happened over the last
two years to cause this trend over the last 2 years. DMS is becoming more concerned over
these assets and considers these to be at risk of not being delivered.
Wildlands believes abnormal rainfall over the past two years has caused groundwater levels to
drop below the 12 inch threshold earlier in the growing season than normal. Rainfall has been
abnormally low and sporadic in the spring of the last two monitoring years, causing groundwater
levels to drop faster than previous years. Wildlands understands that majority of the wetlands
are at risk and would like to see what the groundwater data looks like in a year of normal
rainfall.
7) Appendix 1, Table 1 shows 18,216 SMUs. DMS calculated SMUs at 18,215.10 in excel and 18,215
from WEI's electronic submittal of Table 1. Please change to 18,215 SMUs.
Table 1 was updated to show 18,215 SMUs.
8) Appendix 4, Tables 11a -11f: DMS realizes that there are various methods used to calculate Bank
Height Ratio from year to year. One of these is to hold the bankfull depth static (denominator)
while allowing the Low Top of Bank max depth (numerator) to vary. Another method that has been
proposed and is being evaluated is to hold the As -Built cross-sectional are static with each year's
new cross-section and allow that to determine the max bankfull depth for each year. However, if
there are large changes in the W/D ratio either method can make for somewhat distorted BHR
values depending upon the direction and magnitude of the changes in W/D ratio. Please update the
calculations to reflect changes observed in the overlays and explain in detail as a footnote with the
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (P) 919.851.9986 - 312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225 • Raleigh, NC 27609

w
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
tables that describes the method by which Wildlands is calculating Bank Height Ratio and
Entrenchment Ratio. In addition, please provide context to any observed changes in these
calculated ratios in the report narrative. Wildlands must be prepared to defend the method used
for credit release and justify through context whether or not any changes observed in a cross
section represent an issue.
A footnote was added to Tables 11a -11f in Appendix 4 describing the method used to calculate Bank
Height Ratio, and Entrenchment Ratio.
9) Appendix 5, Table14
a) Groundwater gauge 34 has failed to meet hydrologic success (8.5%) during the first four years of
monitoring. During the MY 3 site visit in December 2016, Wildlands and DMS staff checked this
gauge specifically to see why it continued to fail. DMS and Wildlands agreed during the 2016
site visit that the soils around gauge 34 appeared to contain hydric indicators that point towards
the soils becoming hydric and that groundwater within the gauge was within 12 inches of the
ground surface. Given this, Wildlands stated that they would replace the transducer in this
gauge and collect data during the Year 4 monitoring period and reassess success in this wetland
area. Clarify whether Wildlands replaced the transducer as discussed and if so, provide an
explanation for the continued failure of this gauge. As discussed in MY 3, DMS considers these
wetland assets to be at risk of not being delivered.
The transducer on groundwater well 34 was replaced at the beginning of 2017. Wildlands
believes abnormally low rainfall, and the open ditch along the KOA campground to the north of
well 34 are contributing to the continue failure of groundwater well 34. Wildlands understands
this wetland area is at risk and will re-evaluate it during MYS.
b) Based on the data in the MY4 report, DMS believes that the vast majority of wetland assets (in
excess of 50% of the site) are at risk and unless Wildlands can provide a convincing argument
to the contrary, DMS will recommend further withholding of wetland assets from credit
release.
10) Based upon the change in credit calculations directed by the IRT and the loss wetland credits in the
vicinity of gauge 10, the total credits determined by DMS are 165 SMUs and 3.6 WMUs below the
currently adjusted contract amount of 18,380 SMUs and 62.1 WMUs. Therefore, the contract value
would need to be reduced $236,835.00 from $8,182,485.00 based on the shortfall of stream and
wetland credits. To reconcile the overpayment, please adjust the Task 10 paym to
revised amount of $231,498.00. The remaining future milestone invoice amoun , e�isecf - ,T s"
-
Invoices will be adjusted to account for loss of credits. FEB 1 4- 2018
If you have any questions, please contact me by phone [phone], or by email DIVISION OF
(jlorch@wild landseng.com). 1AITIGATIO ,I SERVICES
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (P) 919.851.9986 • 312 west Millbrook Road, Suite 225 • Raleigh, NC 27609

WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
Sincerely,
Jason Lorch, Monitoring Coordinotor
%k�. Wlldlands Engineering, Inc. (P) 919.851.9986 • 312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225 • Raleigh, NC 27609

PREPARED BY:
rwk
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Jason Lorch
[e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report — FINAL

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Wildlands Engineering (Wildlands) completed a full -delivery project for the North Carolina Division of
Mitigation Services (DMS) to restore and enhance a total of 18,748 linear feet (LF) of stream and restore
59.70 acres (ac) of wetlands in Johnston County, North Carolina. The project streams consist of five
unnamed tributaries (UTs) to the Neuse River. The largest of these streams, Devil's Racetrack Creek (East
and West), drains directly to the Neuse River. The other four streams are small headwater tributaries to
Devil's Racetrack Creek (Southwest Branch, Middle Branch, Southeast Branch, and North Branch). The
project proposes to provide 18,215 stream mitigation units (SMU's) and 58.50 wetland mitigation units
(WMU's). At the downstream limits of the project, the drainage area is 831 acres (1.30 square miles).
The Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site, hereafter referred to as the Site, is located in eastern Johnston
County along Devil's Racetrack Road just east of its intersection with U.S. Highway 701 and approximately
one mile east of Interstate 95 (Figure 1). The Site is located in the western portion of the Inner Coastal
Plain Physiographic Province (USGS, 1998). The Site is located within the North Carolina Division of Water
Resources (NCDWR) subbasin 03-04-02 of the Neuse River Basin (United States Geological Survey (USGS)
Hydrologic Unit 03020201140010).
Prior to construction activities, the streams had been relocated and channelized and the surrounding
wetland complex had been drained for agricultural purposes. The primary objectives of the project were
to promote wetland hydrology; restore a Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp wetland community; restore
a Coastal Plain stream system to promote hydrologic connectivity with the floodplains and wetlands;
stabilize stream banks; promote instream habitat and aeration; restore riparian buffers; and further
improve water quality through removing existing agricultural practices. Figure 2 and Table 1 present the
restoration and enhancement design for the Site.
The following project goals were established to address the effects listed above from watershed and
project site stressors:
• Restore a large wetland complex to a naturally occurring community to improve riparian
habitat and water quality;
• Restore a network of badly degraded stream channels, including multiple headwater streams,
to create aquatic habitat and further improve water quality to receiving waters; and
• Restore riparian buffers along stream corridors for additional habitat and water quality
benefits.
Stream and wetland restoration and enhancement construction efforts were completed in February 2014.
Baseline as -built monitoring activities (MYO) were completed between January and February 2014. A
conservation easement is in place on 96.065 acres of the stream and wetland riparian corridors to protect
them in perpetuity.
Monitoring Year 4 (MY4) assessment and site visits were completed between the months of March and
November 2017 to assess the conditions of the project. Overall, the Site has met the required vegetation,
hydrology, and stream success criteria for MY4. The overall MY4 average planted stem density for the
Site is 581 stems per acre, which is greater than the year five interim density requirement of 260 stems
per acre. All restored and enhanced streams are stable and functioning as designed. Southeast Branch,
Southwest Branch, and Middle Branch all had pressure transducers installed to monitor stream flow. All
three stream gages met the hydrologic criteria for MY4. Of the 38 groundwater monitoring wells on the
Site, 17 met the success criteria (water table with 12 inches of the ground surface for 8.5% of the growing
kDevil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report — FINAL iii

season consecutively), eight had a hydroperiod greater than 5% but did not meet the success criteria, and
13 had a hydroperiod below 5% however two of these are located outside of the wetland boundary.
Timing and intensity of rainfall is believed to be the cause for lower hydrology performance than in
previous monitoring years as explained in the report.
kDevil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report — FINAL iv

DEVIL'S RACETRACK MITIGATION SITE
Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1:
PROJECT OVERVIEW.......................................................................................................1-1
Figure 1
1.1
Project Goals and Objectives.....................................................................................................1-1
Project Component/Asset Map
1.2
Monitoring Year 4 Data Assessment..........................................................................................1-2
Table 2
1.2.1
Vegetative Assessment......................................................................................................1-2
Project Contacts Table
1.2.2
Vegetation Areas of Concern.............................................................................................1-3
1.2.3
Stream Assessment............................................................................................................1-3
1.2.4
Stream Areas of Concern...................................................................................................1-4
1.2.5
Hydrology Assessment.......................................................................................................1-4
1.2.6
Wetland Assessment..........................................................................................................1-4
1.2.7
Maintenance Plan..............................................................................................................1-6
1.3
Monitoring Year 4 Summary......................................................................................................1-6
Section2:
METHODOLOGY.............................................................................................................2-1
Section3:
REFERENCES...................................................................................................................3-1
APPENDICES
Appendix 1
General Tables and Figures
Figure 1
Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2a -b
Project Component/Asset Map
Table 1
Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3
Project Contacts Table
Table 4
Project Information and Attributes
Appendix 2 Visual Assessment Data
Figure 3.0-3.2 Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Table 5a -f Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Stream Photographs
Vegetation Photographs
Appendix 3 Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Table 8 CVS Vegetation Table - Metadata
Table 9 Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
Appendix 4 Morphological Summary Data and Plots
Table 10a -f Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 11a -f Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters — Cross Section)
Table 12a -f Monitoring Data — Stream Reach Data Summary
Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report — FINAL v

Appendix 5 Hydrology Summary Data and Plots
Table 13 Verification of Bankfull Events
Table 14 Wetland Gage Attainment Summary
Groundwater Gage Plots
Stream Flow Gage Plots
Monthly Rainfall Data
Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report — FINAL vi

Section 1: PROJECT OVERVIEW
The Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site, hereafter referred to as the Site, is located in eastern Johnston
County within the Neuse River Basin (USGS Hydrologic Unit 03020201) near the town of Four Oaks, North
Carolina. The Site is located along Devil's Racetrack Road just east of its intersection with U.S. Highway
701 and approximately one mile east of Interstate 95. The Site is located in the western portion of the
Inner Coastal Plain Physiographic Province (USGS, 1998). The project watershed consists primarily of
agricultural lands and forest. The only significant development in the watershed is a campground adjacent
to Devil's Racetrack Creek on the western portion of the project site, a middle school in the upper portion
of the watershed, a low-density subdivision with single family homes, and a small section of 1-95. The
drainage area for the project site is 831 acres (1.30 square miles) at the lower end of Devil's Racetrack
Creek (East).
The project stream reaches include Devil's Racetrack Creek (East and West), Southwest Branch, Middle
Branch, Southeast Branch, and North Branch, (stream restoration and/or enhancement level 1/11
approach). Mitigation work within the Site included restoration and enhancement of 18,748 linear feet
(LF) of perennial and intermittent stream channel and restoration of 59.7 acres (ac) of riparian wetlands.
The stream and wetland areas were also planted with native vegetation to improve habitat and protect
water quality. The final mitigation plan was submitted and accepted by the DMS in January of 2013.
Construction activities were completed by Land Mechanic Designs, Inc. (East Side) and Fluvial Solutions
(West Side) in February 2014. Planting and seeding activities were completed by Bruton Natural Systems,
Inc. in February 2014. Baseline monitoring (MYO) was conducted between December 2013 and February
2014. Annual monitoring will be conducted for seven years with the close-out anticipated to commence
in 2021 given the success criteria are met. Appendix 1 provides more detailed project activity, history,
contact information, and watershed/site background information for this project.
A conservation easement has been recorded and is in place along the stream and wetland riparian
corridors to protect them in perpetuity; 96.065 ac (Deed Book 4221, Page 419-433) within two tracts
owned by Nell Howell Revocable Trust. The project provides 18,215 stream mitigation units (SMU's) and
58.50 wetland mitigation units (WMU's). Directions and a map of the Site are provided in Figure 1 and
project components are illustrated in Figures 2a and 2b.
1.1 Project Goals and Objectives
Prior to construction activities, the streams had been relocated and channelized and the surrounding
wetland complex had been drained for agricultural purposes. Stream valleys and other low areas were
filled to raise wet areas and even out the fields. At the same time the streams were straightened and
riparian vegetation was also removed. The project area west of Devil's Racetrack Road was used for row
crop agriculture and the eastern portion was used for timber production.
The channelization of streams on the Site resulted in severely over -enlarged channels that were extremely
deep in many locations. The alterations of the Site to promote farming practices resulted in complete
elimination of the ecological function of this small stream/wetland complex. Specifically, functional losses
at the Site include degraded aquatic habitat, altered hydrology (related to loss of floodplain connection
and lowered water table), and reduction of quality and amount of riparian wetland habitats and related
water quality benefits. Ongoing bank erosion was also occurring at some locations due to high, overly
steep banks and lack of bank vegetation. Table 4 in Appendix 1 and Tables 10a through 10f in Appendix
4 present the pre -restoration conditions in detail.
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report — FINAL 1-1

The Site was designed to meet the over -arching goals as described in the mitigation plan (Wildlands,
2013). The project is intended to provide numerous ecological benefits within the Neuse River Basin.
While many of these benefits are limited to the Devil's Racetrack Creek Site project area, others, such as
pollutant removal and improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat, have more far-reaching effects. The
following project specific goals established in the mitigation plan include:
• Restore a large wetland complex to a naturally occurring community to improve riparian
habitat and water quality;
• Restore a network of badly degraded stream channels, including multiple headwaters
streams, to create aquatic habitat and further improve water quality to receiving waters; and
• Restore riparian buffers along stream corridors for additional habitat and water quality
benefits.
Secondary project goals established in the mitigation plan were to restore fish passage from the Neuse
River to Devil's Racetrack Creek. This is a secondary goal because success will not be measured during
monitoring.
The primary project goals were addressed through the following project objectives:
• Promote wetland hydrology by raising channelized stream beds and filling drainage ditches;
• Plant wetland areas with native tree species to restore a Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp —
Blackwater Subtype community;
• Reconstruct stream channels to have the appropriate slope, planform, and cross-sectional
geometry for the region of the Coastal Plain in which the project is located;
• Size reconstructed stream channels to flood floodplains and wetlands frequently;
• Stabilize stream banks using bioengineering, natural channel design techniques, and grading
to reduce bank angles and bank height;
• Install in -stream structures and woody debris to promote aeration of water, create habitat,
and influence the creation of bed forms commonly found in sand bed channels;
• Restore riparian buffer areas with native tree species to stabilize channels, filter flood flows
and runoff, and supplement wetland plantings; and
• Remove project area from agricultural production further improving water quality.
The design streams and wetlands were restored to the appropriate type based on the surrounding
landscape, climate, and natural vegetation communities but also with strong consideration to existing
watershed conditions and trajectory. The mitigation project was developed to restore a large
stream/wetland complex directly adjacent to the Neuse River to a naturally occurring community to
create riparian and wetland habitat and improve water quality. Other key factors addressed in the design
were to create stable habitats, improve riparian buffers, and restore the natural migration patterns for
anadromous and other fish for spawning.
1.2 Monitoring Year 4 Data Assessment
Annual monitoring and quarterly site visits were conducted during MY4 to assess the condition of the
project. The stream and wetland mitigation success criteria for the Site follow the approved success
criteria presented in the Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Plan (Wildlands, 2013).
1.2.1 Vegetative Assessment
A total of 51 vegetation plots were established during the baseline monitoring within the project
easement areas. All of the plots were installed using a standard 10 meter by 10 meter plot. The final
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report — FINAL 1-2

vegetative success criteria will be the survival of 210 planted stems per acre in the riparian corridor along
restored and enhanced reaches and within the wetland restoration areas at the end of the seven year
monitoring period (MY7). The interim measure of vegetative success for the Site will be the survival of at
least 260 stems per acre at the end of the fifth year of monitoring (MY5). Planted vegetation must average
10 feet in height in each plot at the end of the seventh year of monitoring.
The MY4 vegetative survey was completed in August 2017. The 2017 vegetation monitoring resulted in
an average planted stem density of 581 stems per acre, which is greater than the interim requirement of
260 stems per acre required at MY4, but approximately 17% less than the baseline density recorded at
MYO, in January 2014. When including volunteer stems, the average stems per acre is 926. This is well
above the MY5 interim requirement of 260 stems per acre. There was an average of 14 planted stems
per plot which is a slight decrease from 15 stems per plot in MY3. All 51 of the vegetation plots individually
met success criteria for MY4 and are on track to meet the success criteria required for MY7 (Table 9,
Appendix 3). Refer to Appendix 2 for vegetation plot photographs and the vegetation condition
assessment table and Appendix 3 for vegetation data tables.
1.2.2 Vegetation Areas of Concern
Along the lower section of Devil's Racetrack (East), there are a few bare areas totaling 4.8 acres
(approximately 5.0% of the planted acreage). In these bare areas, the planted trees appear healthy and
volunteer trees have sprouted, but the herbaceous ground cover is still deficient and not well established.
This area was graded down several feet during construction which removed the nutrient rich top soil,
leaving a more acidic subsoil. Wildlands incorporated liquid and pelletized lime into the soil during
construction with the expectation that the pH would increase over the first year or two and would provide
better herbaceous growing conditions. As of MY4, this area still has low pH soils, but continues to improve
as the herbaceous ground cover density develops. In May hugel beds (small trenches filled with organic
material and covered with straw or mulch to hold moisture) were installed at varying locations within the
4.8 acre problem area to help promote vegetation growth. A mixture of mulch, lime, fertilizer, and
temporary and permanent grasses was applied in November to add organic matter to the surface of the
excavated areas to promote herbaceous ground cover.
Throughout the site pine trees have begun to grow with the planted trees. On the west side of the project
the pine trees are mixed in with the planted trees and herbaceous cover and are not affecting planted
vegetation. On the east side of the project pine trees are growing at a high density and could potentially
affect planted vegetation if not maintained during MY5. Wildlands thinned the pine trees in this area
during MY4, and plans to cut them on both sides of the Site during MY5.
This winter supplemental tree planting will be performed in these areas as needed. Tree species that can
tolerate lower pH levels will be planted. During MY5 Wildlands will continue to monitor these areas and
will reapply seed and soil amendments as necessary. Refer to Appendix 2 for the vegetation condition
assessment table, the Integrated Current Condition Plan View (CCPV), and reference photographs.
1.2.3 Stream Assessment
Morphological surveys for MY4 were conducted in May 2017. All streams within the Site are stable and
met success criteria for MY4. In general, cross sections for all streams showed little to no change in
bankfull area, maximum depth ratio, or width -to -depth ratio. Cross section surveys show that the bank
height ratios remain at or very near 1.0. Entrenchment ratios vary slightly from year to year due to minor
changes in bankfull widths. Small adjustments in width occur due to vegetation, sediment deposition, and
many other factors. These minor changes do not indicate channel instability. Surveyed riffle cross sections
fell within the parameters defined for channels of the appropriate Rosgen stream type.
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report — FINAL 1-3

Longitudinal profile surveys are not required on the project unless visual inspection indicates reach wide
vertical stability concerns. Refer to Appendix 2 for the visual stability assessment table, the CCPV map,
and reference photographs. Refer to Appendix 4 for the morphological data and plots.
1.2.4 Stream Areas of Concern
No stream areas of concern were identified during MY4.
1.2.5 Hydrology Assessment
At the end of the seven-year monitoring period, two or more bankfull events must have occurred in
separate years within the restoration reaches. Multiple bankfull events were recorded on all the streams
with crest gages and pressure transducers during the MY4 data collection. All streams on the Site had
multiple bankfull events during MY1, MY2, and MY3. Therefore, the Site has met the required stream
hydrology success criteria.
Pressure transducers were also installed on Southwest Branch, Southeast Branch, and Middle Branch to
measure stream flow. These pressure transducers were installed to show that the streams have adequate
flow throughout the year and are not ephemeral ditches. Per discussion with the Interagency Review
Team (IRT), on these three streams, consistent flow must be documented for at least 30 consecutive days
under normal circumstances. Stream flow must be documented to occur intermittently in all months
other than July through September. Southwest Branch and Middle Branch showed constant flow
throughout MY4. Southeast Branch showed consistent flow for 70 consecutive days, from January to mid-
April. From mid-April to July Southeast Branch showed intermittent flow. All three intermittent streams
have met the flow success criteria for MY4. Refer to Appendix 5 for hydrologic data.
1.2.6 Wetland Assessment
Thirty-four groundwater monitoring gages were established during the baseline monitoring and four
additional gages were added during MY2, all but two (GW8, and GW32) are within the wetland restoration
zones. Groundwater gages 8, and 32 were placed outside of wetland boundaries to capture the extent of
the wetlands. These gages will be removed in subsequent monitoring years. All the gages were installed
at appropriate locations so that the data collected will provide an indication of groundwater levels
throughout the Site. To provide data for the determination of the growing season, three soil temperature
probes (2 on the west side and 1 on the east side) have been installed at a depth of twelve inches. A
barotroll logger (to measure barometric pressure used in the calculations of groundwater levels with well
transducer data) and a rain gage were also installed on the Site. All monitoring gages were downloaded
and maintained on an as needed basis. The success criteria for wetland hydrology is to have a free
groundwater surface within 12 inches of the ground surface for 8.5 percent of the growing season, which
is measured in consecutive days under typical precipitation conditions. During MY1 NRCS WETS Data was
used to determine the growing season for the Site. After discussions with the United States Army Corps
of Engineers (USACE), it was agreed to use on-site soil temperature data to determine the beginning of
the growing season and use NRCS WETS data to determine the end of the growing season. During MY4
the beginning of the growing season was extended by 20 days based on soil temperatures staying above
41 degrees Fahrenheit at 12 inches below the ground surface.
The USACE also requested pre -construction groundwater well data be overlaid on hydrographs with the
current monitoring year groundwater well data. USACE requested this data to see how groundwater
levels are recharging after rain events on the Site. Wildlands overlaid the pre -construction groundwater
well data with the closest monitoring groundwater well data and rain data. It is evident from these
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report — FINAL 1-4

overlays that the Site drained more rapidly and to greater depths prior to restoration. Refer to Appendix
5 for pre and post construction groundwater gage comparison plots.
Of the 38 groundwater monitoring wells on the Site, 17 met the success criteria (water table with 12
inches of the ground surface for 8.5% of the growing season consecutively), eight had a hydroperiod
greater than 5% but did not meet the success criteria, and 13 had a hydroperiod below 5% however two
of these are located outside of the wetland boundaries (GWB, and GW32). Of the 17 wells that met the
success criteria, hydroperiods ranged from 8.8% to 30.0%, with one outlier at 39.2%. Eight wells had a
hydroperiod range of 5.0% to 6.2% which is greater than USACE defined minimum wetland hydroperiod
but lower than the listed success criteria. Of the 11 wells within the wetland boundaries that showed
hydroperiods below 5.0% the majority of these are around the wetland perimeter where elevations start
to rise.
Overall rainfall year to date is average with a few months exceeding the USDA listed 70th percentile
monthly rainfall limit. However, the beginning of 2017 was significantly drier than normal. During MY4,
three of the first four months of the year had rainfall below the USDA listed 30th percentile. January had
a total of 2.96 inches of rain, February had 0.84 inches, and April had 1.78 inches for the month before a
large rain event that occurred on April 24th. These rainfall totals are well below normal when compared
the 30th percentile (Appendix 5). The 30th percentile for January is 3.17, which is 10 percent higher than
the actual amount of rainfall received in 2017. For February, the 301h percentile is 2.54 inches of rain,
which is three times the amount of rain that fell during February 2017. Assuming an even rainfall
distribution across the month of April, the 30th percentile for the period from April 1 to April 20 is 1.34
inches. Due to these drier than normal months, groundwater levels dropped from at or near the ground
surface to below the 12 inch threshold in February and did not rebound until later in the growing season
when evapotranspiration rates are too high to sustain high water tables. In previous years, water levels
did not drop to this level until May.
Rainfall patterns from the end of April through the summer were atypical with periodic large events
followed by extended periods of no rain. April had above normal rainfall with 7.90 inches, however 5.88
inches fell during one storm event on April 24th and 25th. This large event occurred near the end of April
after several months of below normal rainfall. When conditions are dry and large rainfall events occur,
runoff tends to be high relative to infiltration (Winter 1998).
Groundwater wells 22 and 25 are good examples of how rainfall affected groundwater levels during 2017.
Both wells met wetland success criteria during the previous three years of monitoring. During MY4 both
wells had groundwater within a few inches of the surface during January, however in February
groundwater levels fell near the 12 inch threshold for wetland success criteria. With below normal rainfall
in January, February, and most of April, groundwater levels stayed below 12 inches, except for a normal
rainfall period from mid-March to the beginning of April. The reference well displayed a similar
groundwater pattern as wells 22 and 25 and performed worse than 29 of the 38 groundwater wells on
the Site. This reference wetland has been monitored since 2001 and has met wetland criteria for every
year Wildlands has data (2006-2010, 2015-2016) except for 2017. Along with below normal rainfall, 2017
had above average ambient temperatures in January and February, which increased evaporation further
exacerbating the problem.
Groundwater well 10 has not meet the success criteria during the first four monitoring years. After
multiple field observations Wildlands adjusted the wetland boundaries around groundwater well 10 based
on hydrology, soils, topography, and vegetation during MY4. Hydric soils were not forming in this area
and it was obvious this area was not maintaining hydrology. Wetland mitigation credits were updated in
Table 1 and Figures 2a -b and 3.0-3.2 show the revised wetland boundaries. Refer to Appendix 2 for the
groundwater gage locations and Appendix 5 for groundwater hydrology data and plots.
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report — FINAL 1-5

1.2.7 Maintenance Plan
Pine trees will be removed from the site as described in section 1.2.2 above. Also, supplemental planting
will be performed this winter to the bare areas on the east side as needed. Section 1.2.2 describes this in
more detail.
1.3 Monitoring Year 4 Summary
The average stem density for the Site is on track to meeting the MY7 success criteria; all individual
vegetation plots meet the MY4 success criteria as noted in the CCPV. All streams within the Site are stable
and functioning as designed. There have been at least two documented bankfull events recorded in
separate years for each stream on the Site. Of the 38 groundwater monitoring wells on the Site, 17 met
the success criteria (water table with 12 inches of the ground surface for 8.5% of the growing season
consecutively), eight had a hydroperiod greater than 5% but did not meet the success criteria, and 13 had
a hydroperiod below 5% however two of these are located outside of the wetland boundary. Timing and
intensity of rainfall is believed to be the cause for lower hydrology performance than in previous
monitoring years as explained in the report.
Summary information and data related to the success of various project and monitoring elements can be
found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting
information formerly found in these reports can be found in the Mitigation Plan documents available on
DMS's website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available from DMS
upon request.
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report — FINAL 1-6

Section 2: METHODOLOGY
Geomorphic data was collected following the standards outlined in The Stream Channel Reference Site:
An Illustrated Guide to Field Techniques (Harrelson et al., 1994) and in the Stream Restoration: A Natural
Channel Design Handbook (Doll et al., 2003). All the Integrated Current Condition Mapping was recorded
using a Trimble handheld GPS with sub -meter accuracy and processed using Pathfinder and ArcGIS. Crest
gages and pressure transducers were installed in surveyed riffle cross sections and monitored quarterly.
Hydrology attainment installation and monitoring methods are in accordance with the USACE (2003)
standards. Vegetation monitoring protocols followed the Carolina Vegetation Survey -DMS Level 2
Protocol (Lee et al., 2008).
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report — FINAL 2-1

Section 3: REFERENCES
Doll, B.A., Grabow, G.L., Hall, K.A., Halley, J., Harman, W.A., Jennings, G.D., and Wise, D.E. 2003. Stream
Restoration A Natural Channel Design Handbook.
Harrelson, C.C., Rawlins, C.L., Potyondy, J.P. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated Guide
to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM -245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 61 p.
Lee, M.T., Peet, R.K., S.D., Wentworth, T.R. 2008. CVS -DMS Protocol for Recording Vegetation Version
4.2. Retrieved from http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/protocol/cvs-eep-protocol-v4.2-lev1-5.pdf.
Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169-199.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Pagosa Springs, CO: Wildland Hydrology Books.
Rosgen, D.L. 1997. A Geomorphological Approach to Restoration of Incised Rivers. Proceedings of the
Conference on Management of Landscapes Disturbed by Channel Incision. Center For
Computational Hydroscience and Bioengineering, Oxford Campus, University of Mississippi,
Pages 12-22.
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACE, NCDEQ-
DWR, USEPA, NCWRC.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2002. Natural Resources Conservation Service,
Climate Information for Johnston County, NC (1971-2000). WETS Station: Clayton, NC1820.
United States Geological Survey (USGS). 1998. North Carolina Geology.
http://www.geology.enr.state.nc.us/usgs/carolina.htm
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2013. Devil's Racetrack Stream and Wetland Mitigation Plan. DMS, Raleigh,
NC.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2014. Devil's Racetrack Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Baseline
Monitoring Document and As -Built Baseline Report. DMS, Raleigh, NC.
Winter, Thomas C., Harvey, Judson W., Franke, O. Lehn, Alley, William M. 1998. Ground Water and
Surface Water: A Single Resource.
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report — FINAL 3-1

APPENDIX 1. General Tables and Figures

[IkllY�lY�ll1 it f'�lllkll]
Cr
4
�` ���
Four
=o
Juni
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of the
g5�
NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) and is
encompassed by a recorded conservation easement, but is
bordered by land under private ownership. Accessing the site may
�
require traversing areas near or along the easement boundary and
03020201150020 k,
therefore access by the general public is not permitted. Access by
authorized personnel of state and federal agencies or their
designees/contractors involved in the development, oversight,
Directions:
03020201130030 Country Club
and stewardship of the restoration site is permitted within the terms
From 1-95 exit 90, turn left onto NC -96 N.
;f� C]live tiof Johnston
County
NC -96 N turns slightly left and becomes
activity by any person outside of these previously sanctioned roles
Devils Racetrack Rd. Follow Devils
and activites requires prior coordination with DMS.
f?s,
stack Gfeek 1251r
Holts Lake
amp
_
Gym Swanw,
I►r�
WWILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
1
Hydrologic Unit Code (14)
- DMS Targeted Local Watershed
030202011006 Project Location
c�
4 �
03020201140010
mi"
aranoh
7� �J
''�e��
YO
t �
03020201150050
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
0 0.5 1 Miles Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
1 I DMS Project No. 95021
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Johnston County, NC
4
�` ���
Four
Juni
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of the
g5�
NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) and is
encompassed by a recorded conservation easement, but is
bordered by land under private ownership. Accessing the site may
�
require traversing areas near or along the easement boundary and
03020201150020 k,
therefore access by the general public is not permitted. Access by
authorized personnel of state and federal agencies or their
designees/contractors involved in the development, oversight,
Directions:
and stewardship of the restoration site is permitted within the terms
From 1-95 exit 90, turn left onto NC -96 N.
and timeframes of their defined roles. Any intended site visitation or
NC -96 N turns slightly left and becomes
activity by any person outside of these previously sanctioned roles
Devils Racetrack Rd. Follow Devils
and activites requires prior coordination with DMS.
Racetrack Road south for 2.1 miles.
WWILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
1
Hydrologic Unit Code (14)
- DMS Targeted Local Watershed
030202011006 Project Location
c�
4 �
03020201140010
mi"
aranoh
7� �J
''�e��
YO
t �
03020201150050
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
0 0.5 1 Miles Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
1 I DMS Project No. 95021
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Johnston County, NC

Figure 2a. Project Component/Asset Map
W I L D L A N D S 0 250 500 Feet Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
ENGINEERINGrkt
I I I t DMS Project No. 95021
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Johnston County, NC

Figure 2b. Project Component/Asset Map
�illITOWILDLANDS 0 250 500 Feet Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING
rk� I I I t DMS Project No. 95021
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Johnston County, NC

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
N/A: not applicable
1. Ratio of 4:1 based on an expected 75% reduction in credits for stream restoration with shrub buffer zone in power line easements.
* Stream credit calculations were originally calculated along the as -built thalweg and updated to be calculated along stream centerlines for Monitoring Year 4 after discusions with INC IRT.
** Riparian Wetlands (West) credit calculations were updated for Monitoring Year 4 based on the performance of groundwater well 10.
Mitigation Credits
Stream
Type R
RE
R par an Wetland
R
RE
"n-Ripairlain Met
R RE
Totals 18,215
0
58.50
0
N/A N/A
I N/A N/A
N/A
Reach ID
As -Built
tationing/
Location
Existing
Footage/
Acreage
Project Components
Restoration,or Restoration
Equ valent
q
Restoration Footage/
Acreage
Mitigation
Ratio
Credits
(SMU/ WMU)
Streams
Devil's Racetrack Creek
Restoration
0+00-0+20
20 LF
P1
20
N/A
N/A
(West) (DOT ROW)
(No Credit)
Devil's Racetrack Creek
0+20-16+26 &
4,755 LF
PS
Restoration
5,061
1:1
5,061
(West)
17+50-52+05
Devil's Racetrack Creek
(West) (Power Line
16+26-17+50
196 LF
Pi
Restoration
124
4:1'
31
(Partial Credit)
Easement)
Devil's Racetrack Creek
Restoration
52+05-52+11
5 LF
Pi
6
N/A
N/A
(West) (DOT ROW)
(No Credit)
Devil's Racetrack (East) (DOT
Restoration
52+59-52+65
5 LF
Pi
6
N/A
N/A
ROW)
(No Credit)
52+65-70+73 &
Devil's Racetrack (East)
71+03-88+00 &
4,778 LF
P1/2
Restoration
5,363
1:1
5,363
88+31-106+85
Devil's Racetrack (East)
Restoration
70+73-71+03
30 LF
P1/2
30
N/A
N/A
(Easement Break)
(No Credit)
Devil's Racetrack (East)
Restoration
85+00 to 88+31
31 LF
P1/2
31
N/A
N/A
(Easement Break)
(No Credit)
Restoration
Devil's Racetrack (East)
106+85-107+97
0 LF
P1/2
112
N/A
N/A
(No Credit)
Southwest Branch
500+00-501+31
154 LF
Ell
Enhancement
154
2.5:1
61.6
600+00-600+23
Southwest Branch
501+31-502+06
75 LF
EI
Enhancement
75
1.5:1
50
Southwest Branch
502+06-504+85
740 LF
P1/2
Restoration
812
1:1
812
505+99-511+32
Southwest Branch
504+85-505+99
111 LF
p1/2
Restoration
114
4:1'
28.5
(Power Line Easement)
(Partial Credit)
Middle Branch
200+00-204+10
410 LF
Headwater Wetland
410
1:1
410
Middle Branch
204+10-219+06
1,326 LF
P1/2
Restoration
1,496
1:1
1,496
Southeast Branch
300+00-305+03
2,946 LF
Pi
Restoration
2,860
1:1
2,860
305+35-328+92
Southeast Branch (Easement
Restoration
305+03-305+35
30 LF
P1
32
N/A
N/A
Break)
(Partial Credit)
North Branch
403+76-424+18
---
Pi
Restoration
2,042
1:1
2,042
Wetlands
Riparian Wetlands (West)
N/A
0.0 ac
N/A
Restoration
54.65
1:1
54.65
Riparian Wetlands (West)
Restoration
N/A
0.0 ac
N/A
1.60
4:1
0.40
(Power Line Easement)
(Partial Credit)
Riparian Wetlands (East)
N/A
0.0 ac
N/A
Restoration
3.45
1:1
3.45
Stream
Component Summation
Riparian Wetland Non -Riparian
Wetland
Upland
Restoration Level
[LF)
(acres)
Riverine
(acres)
Non-Riverine
Buffer(square
feet)
(acres)
Restoration
18,519
59.70
- -
-
-
Enhancement
-
- -
-
-
Enhancement 1
75
Enhancement 11
154
Creation
-
- -
Preservation
High Quality Preservation
-
-
- -
-
N/A: not applicable
1. Ratio of 4:1 based on an expected 75% reduction in credits for stream restoration with shrub buffer zone in power line easements.
* Stream credit calculations were originally calculated along the as -built thalweg and updated to be calculated along stream centerlines for Monitoring Year 4 after discusions with INC IRT.
** Riparian Wetlands (West) credit calculations were updated for Monitoring Year 4 based on the performance of groundwater well 10.

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Activity or Report
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Date Collection
Completion or
Raleigh, NC 27609
Complete
September 2011-
Scheduled Delivery
Mitigation Plan
Land Mechanic Designs, Inc.
March 2012
January 2013
Final Design -Construction Plans
Willow Spring, NC 27592
September 2011-
August 2013
P.O. Box 28749
March 2012
Raleigh, NC 27611
Planting Contractor
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
December 2013-
P.O. Box 1197
Construction
Fremont, NC 27830
February 2014
February 2014
Temporary S&E mix applied to entire project area
P.O. Box 1197
February 2014
February 2014
Permanent seed mix applied to reach/segments
Green Resource, LLC
February 2014
February 2014
Bare root and live stake plantings for reach/segments
February 2014
February 2014
Baseline Monitoring Document (Year 0)
Live Stakes
Stream Survey
February 2014Vegetation
May 2014
Stream, Vegetation, and Wetland Monitoring, POC
Jason Lorch
Survey
February 2014
Year 1 Monitoring
Stream Survey
July 2014
December 2014
Vegetation Survey
September 2014
Minor Stream Repairs
May 2014
Year 2 Monitoring
Stream Survey
April 2015
December 2015
Vegetation Survey
June 2015
Minor Stream Repairs & Soil Amendments
April 2015
Year 3 Monitoring
Stream Survey
April 2016
December 2016
Vegetation Survey
June 2016
Soil Amendments
June 2016
Beaver Dam Removal
September 2016
Year 4 Monitoring
Stream Survey
May 2017
December 2017
Vegetation Survey
August 2017
Pine Tree Removal
February 2017
Hugel Beds Installed
May 2017
Soil Amendments
November 2017
Year 5 Monitoring
Stream Survey
2018
December 2018
Vegetation Survey
2018
Year 6 Monitoring
Stream Survey
2019
December 2019
Vegetation Survey
2019
Year 7 Monitoring
Stream Survey
2020
December 2020
Vegetation Survey
2020
'Seed and mulch is added as each section of construction is completed.
Table 3. Project Contact Table
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Designer
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Jeff Keaton, PE
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
919.851.9986
Construction Contractor (East Side)
Land Mechanic Designs, Inc.
126 Circle G Lane
Willow Spring, NC 27592
Construction Contractor (West Side)
Fluvial Solutions
P.O. Box 28749
Raleigh, NC 27611
Planting Contractor
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
P.O. Box 1197
Fremont, NC 27830
Seeding Contractor
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
P.O. Box 1197
Fremont, NC 27830
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resource, LLC
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Dykes and Son Nursery and NC Forest Service
Bare Roots
(Claridge Nursery)
Live Stakes
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
Monitoring Performers
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Stream, Vegetation, and Wetland Monitoring, POC
Jason Lorch
919.851.9986, ext. 107

Table 4. Project Information and Attributes
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Project Information
Project Name
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
County
Johnston County
Project Area (acres)
96.065 ac
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
35° 27'01.58" N, 78° 23' 18.08" W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Upper Coastal Plain
River Basin
Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit
03020201
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit
03020201140010
DWR Sub -basin
03-04-02
Project Drainage Area (acres)
831 ac
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
<1%
CGIA Land Use Classification
62%forest/wetland, 34% farm land, 4% developed
Reach Summary Information
Southwest Middle loutheast North Devil's Devil's
Parameters Racetrack Creek Racetrack Cre'll
1P Branch Branch. Branch Branch (west) (east)
Length of reach (linear feet) - Post -Restoration
1,155 1,906 2,892 2,042 5,211 5,542
Drainage area (acres)
20.6 10.8 69.9 49.9 493.5 831.4
NCDWR stream identification score
34.5-37 30 29-30.75 32 38 37.5
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
C/NSW
Morphological Desription (stream type)
P
P
P/I
P
P
P
Evolutionary trend (Simon's Model) - Pre- Restoration
---
---
---
---
---
---
Underlying mapped soils
Altavista fine sandy loam, Bibb sandy loam, Cecil loam, Goldsboro sandy loam, Leaf silt
loam, Lynchburg sandy loam, Nason silt loam, Norfolk loamy sand, and Rains sandy loam.
Drainage class
--- --- --- --- --- --
Soil Hydric status
--- --- --
Slope
--- --- ---
FEMA classification
None
Native vegetation community
Coastal Plain bottomland riparian forest
Percent composition exotic invasive vegetation -Post-
Restoration
0%
Regulatory Considerations
Waters of the United States - Section 404
X
X
�.
USACE Nationwide Permit No.27 and DWQ 401 Water
Quality Certification No. 3885.
Waters of the United States - Section 401
X
X
Division of Land Quality (Dam Safety)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Endangered Species Act
X
X
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Plan; Wildlands
determined "no effect" on Johnston County listed
endangered species.
Historic Preservation Act
X
X
No historic resources were found to be impacted
(letter from SHPO dated 7/20/2011).
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA)
N/A
N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
N/A
N/A
The project streams do not have an associated
regulatory flooplaing; however the downstream end of
Devil's Racetrack Creek is located within the floodwasy
and flood fringe of the Neuse River (FEMA Zone AE,
FIRM panel 1680).
Essential Fisheries Habitat
I N/A
I N/A
N/A

APPENDIX 2. Visual Assessment Data

Figure 3.0 Integrated Current Condition Plan View
0 500 1,000 Feet(Key)
W I L D L A IST D S I I I Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING
DMS Project No. 95021
rkt Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Johnston County, NC

Figure 3.1 Integrated Current Condition Plan View
0 250 500 Feet(Sheet i of 2)
W I L D L A IST D S I i i i I Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING '
DMS Project No. 95021
Monitoring Year - 2017
Johnston County, NC

Figure 3.2 Integrated Current Condition Plan View
0 250 500 Feet(Sheet 2 of 2)
PAIW W I L D L A IST D S I I I Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING '
DMS Project No. 95021
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Johnston County, NC

Table 5a. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Devil's Racetrack (West) (5,211 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %Stable,
Unstable Unstable Perforing as
m
Segments Footage Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust% for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
74
74
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
74
74
100%
Condition
100%
Length Appropriate
74
74
100%
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
74
74
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
74
74
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
JBank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures)
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
6
6
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
6
6
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.
6
6
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
6
6
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
—Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
6
6
100%
baseflow
Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.

Table 5b. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Devil's Racetrack (East) (5,542 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of
Unstable Unstable
Segments Footage
%Stable,
Perforing as
m
Inten
Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0
100%
Degradation
0 0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
85 85
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
85 85
100%
Condition
Length Appropriate
85 85
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
85 85
100%
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
85 85
100%
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures)
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
17
17
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
17
17
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.
17
17
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
17
17
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
17
17
100%
baseflow
Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.

Table 5c. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Southeast Branch (2,892 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %Stable,
Unstable Unstable Performing as
Segments Footage Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
121
121
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
120
120
100%
Condition
100%
Length Appropriate
120
120
100%
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
120
120
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
120
120
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures)
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
67
67
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
67
67
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.
67
67
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
67
67
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
—Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
67
67
100%
baseflow
Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.

Table 5d. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Middle Branch (1,906 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %StableUnstable Unstable Performing as
Performing
Segments Footage Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust% for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
79
79
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
78
78
100%
Condition
100%
Length Appropriate
78
78
100%
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
78
78
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
78
78
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures)
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
52
52
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
52
52
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.
52
52
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
52
52
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
—Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
52
52
100%
baseflow
Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.

Table 5e. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Southwest Branch (1,155 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %Stable,
Unstable Unstable Performing as
Segments Footage Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
48
48
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
47
47
100%
Condition
100%
Length Appropriate
47
47
100%
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
47
47
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
47
47
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures)
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
28
28
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
28
28
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.
28
28
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
28
28
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
—Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
28
28
100%
baseflow
)Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.

Table 5f. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
North Branch (2,042 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %Stable,
Unstable Unstable Performing as
Segments Footage Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
35 35
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
34 34
100%
Condition
100%
Length Appropriate
34 34
100%
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
34 34
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
34 34
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures)
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
10
10
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
10
10
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.
10
10
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
10
10
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
10
10
100%
baseflow
Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.

Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Planted Acreage 96
Easement Acreage 96
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Number
Combined
Acreage
% of
Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
1,000
0
Combined
0.0%
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
of
Easement Encroachment Areas
Planted
none
0
0
0%
Acreage
(Ac)
Polygons
Acreage
Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.
0.1
5
4.8
5.0%
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count
Low Stem Density Areas
0.1
0
0.0
0.0%
criteria.
Total
5
4.8
5.0%
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring
Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
0.25 Ac
0
0
0%
year.
Cumulative Total
5
4.8
5.0%
Easement Acreage 96
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
(SF)
Number
of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
Planted
Acreage
Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
1,000
0
0
0.0%
Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
none
0
0
0%

STREAM PHOTOGRAPHS
Devil's Racetrack West
Monitoring Year 4
PHOTO POINT 1— looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 1— looking downstream (05/2/2017) 1
PHOTO POINT 2 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 2 — looking downstream (05/2/2017)
0 Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

6. 10
t ��....
r �'+ V�
p
��/
{

Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 12 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 12 — looking downstream (05/2/2017) 1
PHOTO POINT 13 — looking upstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 13 — looking downstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 14 — looking upstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 14 — looking downstream (05/2/2017)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 15 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 15 — looking downstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 16 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 16 — looking downstream (05/2/2017) 1
PHOTO POINT 17 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 17 — looking downstream (05/2/2017)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

jri
1!

PHOTO POINT 21— looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 21— looking downstream (05/2/2017) 1
PHOTO POINT 22 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 22 — looking downstream (05/2/2017) 1
PHOTO POINT 23 — looking upstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 23 — looking downstream (05/2/2017)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 24 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 24 — looking downstream (05/2/2017) 1
PHOTO POINT 25 — looking upstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 26 (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 25 — looking downstream (05/2/2017)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

STREAM PHOTOGRAPHS
Devil's Racetrack East
Monitoring Year 4
PHOTO POINT 27 (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 28 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 28 — looking downstream (05/2/2017)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 29 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 29 — looking downstream (05/2/2017) 1
PHOTO POINT 30 — looking upstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 30 — looking downstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 31— looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 31— looking downstream (05/2/2017) 1
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 32 — looking upstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 32 — looking downstream (05/2/2017)
I PHOTO POINT 33 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 33 — looking downstream (05/2/2017) I
PHOTO POINT 34 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 34 — looking downstream (05/2/2017)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 35 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 35 — looking downstream (05/2/2017) 1
PHOTO POINT 36 — looking upstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 36 — looking downstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 37 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 37 — looking downstream (05/2/2017)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 38 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 38 — looking downstream (05/2/2017) 1
PHOTO POINT 39 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 39 — looking downstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 40 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 40 — looking downstream (05/2/2017) 1
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 41— looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 41— looking downstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 42 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 42 — looking downstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 43 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) I PHOTO POINT 43 — looking downstream (05/2/2017)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 44 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 44 — looking downstream (05/2/2017) 1
I PHOTO POINT 45 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 45 — looking downstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 46 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 46 — looking downstream (05/2/2017)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 47 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 47 — looking downstream (05/2/2017) 1
PHOTO POINT 48 — looking upstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 48 — looking downstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 49 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) I PHOTO POINT 49 — looking downstream (05/2/2017)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 50 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 50 — looking downstream (05/2/2017) 1
PHOTO POINT 51— looking upstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 51— looking downstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 52 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) I PHOTO POINT 52 — looking downstream (05/2/2017)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

v f�

STREAM PHOTOGRAPHS
Southwest Branch
Monitoring Year 4
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 57 — looking upstream (11/16/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 57 — looking downstream (11/16/2017) 1
PHOTO POINT 58 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 58 — looking downstream (05/2/2017) 1
PHOTO POINT 59 — looking upstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 59 — looking downstream (05/2/2017)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

STREAM PHOTOGRAPHS
Middle Branch
Monitoring Year 4
PHOTO POINT 61— looking upstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 61— looking downstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 62 — looking upstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 62 — looking downstream (05/2/2017)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 63 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 63 — looking downstream (05/2/2017) 1
PHOTO POINT 64 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 64 — looking downstream (05/2/2017) 1
PHOTO POINT 65 — looking upstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 65 — looking downstream (05/2/2017)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 66 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 66 — looking downstream (05/2/2017) 1
PHOTO POINT 67 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 67 — looking downstream (05/2/2017) 1
PHOTO POINT 68 — looking upstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 68 — looking downstream (05/2/2017)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

STREAM PHOTOGRAPHS
Southeast Branch
Monitoring Year 4
PHOTO POINT 70 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 70 — looking downstream (05/2/2017) 1
PHOTO POINT 71— looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 71— looking downstream (05/2/2017) I
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 72 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 72 — looking downstream (05/2/2017) 1
PHOTO POINT 73 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 73 — looking downstream (05/2/2017) 1
PHOTO POINT 74 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 74 — looking downstream (05/2/2017) I
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 75 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 75 — looking downstream (05/2/2017) 1
PHOTO POINT 76 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 76 — looking downstream (05/2/2017) 1
PHOTO POINT 77 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 77 — looking downstream (05/2/2017) I
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 81— looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 81— looking downstream (05/2/2017) 1
PHOTO POINT 82 — looking upstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 82 — looking downstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 83 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 83 — looking downstream (05/2/2017) I
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

STREAM PHOTOGRAPHS
North Branch
Monitoring Year 4
PHOTO POINT 84 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 84 — looking downstream (05/2/2017) 1
PHOTO POINT 85 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) I PHOTO POINT 85 — looking downstream (05/2/2017)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 86 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 86 — looking downstream (05/2/2017) 1
PHOTO POINT 87 — looking upstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 87 — looking downstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 88 — looking upstream (11/16/2017)
PHOTO POINT 88 — looking downstream (11/16/2017)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 89 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 89 — looking downstream (05/2/2017) 1
PHOTO POINT 90 — looking upstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 90 — looking downstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 91— looking upstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 91— looking downstream (05/2/2017)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 92 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 92 — looking downstream (05/2/2017) 1
PHOTO POINT 93 — looking upstream (05/2/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 93 — looking downstream (05/2/2017) 1
W—
PHOTO POINT 94 — looking upstream (05/2/2017)
PHOTO POINT 94 — looking downstream (05/2/2017)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

VEGETATION PHOTOGRAPHS
Devil's Racetrack
Monitoring Year 4
VEG PLOT 1(08/01/2017) 1 VEG PLOT 2 (08/01/2017) 1
VEG PLOT 3 (08/01/2017)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Vegetation Photographs
VEG PLOT 4 (08/01/2017)

3yqq�P ic�
i�
F
yet

- •Ja 7kll�1
EN
.yyy
Y
' • I: I I • I: I I
_ �ar q fr tet' • � � ii - yr..� '�— �. �:. ("�8��'14 L ���jf�et`.
r^
XT
a
id a.y
3•�
�ff �
,r

SRM -1-
-r
i k4 ,`
F15

0
E
t
` 7 !

1 fr
f
i � Y

N g
YF
j�
�n4,4
-'.
i

VEG PLOT 41(08/01/2017) 1 VEG PLOT 42 (08/01/2017) 1
VEG PLOT 43 (08/01/2017) VEG PLOT 44 (08/01/2017) 1
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Vegetation Photographs

VEG PLOT 47 (08/01/2017) 1 VEG PLOT 48 (08/01/2017) 1
VEG PLOT 49 (08/01/2017)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Vegetation Photographs
VEG PLOT 50 (08/01/2017)

APPENDIX 3. Vegetation Plot Data

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Success Criteria
Plot Met (Y/N)
Tract Mean
1 Y
100%
2 Y
3 Y
4 Y
5 Y
6 Y
7 Y
8 Y
9 Y
10 Y
11 Y
12 Y
13 Y
14 Y
15 Y
16 Y
17 Y
18 Y
19 Y
20 Y
21 Y
22 Y
23 Y
24 Y
25 Y
26 Y
27 Y
28 Y
29 Y
30 Y
31 Y
32 Y
33 Y
34 Y
35 Y
36 Y
37 Y
38 Y
39 Y
40 Y
41 Y
42 Y
43 Y
44 Y
45 Y
46 Y
47 Y
48 Y
49 Y
50 Y
51 Y

Table B. CVS Vegetation Table - Metadata
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Database name
Devils Racetrack MY3 cvs-eep-entrytool-v2.3.1.mdb
Database location
F:\Projects\005-02129 Devil's Racetrack\Monitoring\Monitoring Year 4\Vegetation Assessment
Computer name
CAROLYN
File size
55967744
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT------------
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This excludes live stakes.
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
1A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY -------------------------------------
Project Code
95021
project Name
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site
Description
Stream and Wetland Mitigation
River Basin
Neuse
Sampled Plots
51

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY4 2017)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021-01-0001
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0002
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0003
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0004
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0005
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
3
3
3
4
4
4
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
4
1
20
8
17
1
10
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
3
3
3
1
1
1
3
3
3
Pinus
pine
Tree
2
1
13
9
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
3
3
3
1
1
1
3
3
3
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
3
3
3
4
4
4
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
Shrub
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
Salix sericea
silky willow
Shrub
Taxodium distichum
I bald cypress
ITree
2
2
2
3
3 1
3
3
3
3
33
3
4
4
4
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
17
7
688
17
1
0.02
7
688
23
9
930.8
16
7
647.5
16
1
0.02
7
647.5
36
8
F1457
16
7
647.5
16
1
0.02
7
647.5
24
8
971.2
11
6
445.2
11
1
0.02
6
445.2
41
8
1659
12
5
485.6
12
1
0.02
5
485.6
31
7
1255
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY4 2017)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021-01-0006
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0007
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0008
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0009
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0010
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
5
5
5
5
5
5
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
4
4
4
1
1
1
3
3
3
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
4
1
1
1
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
5
5
5
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
1
1
1
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
Pinus
pine
Tree
2
8
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
5
6
5
5
5
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
6
2
2
2
2
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
Shrub
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
Salix sericea
silky willow
Shrub
Taxodium distichum
I bald cypress
Tree
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4 1
4
3 1
3 1
3
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)i
Species counti
Stems per ACREI
15
5 1
607 1
15
1
0.02
5
607
25
1 7
1 1012
12
4
485.6 1485.6
12
1
0.02
4
1566.6
14
5
13
6
526.11526.11990
13
1
0.02
6
22
8
15
6
607 1
15
1
0.02
6
607 1
17
7
688
12
4
1485.6
12
1
0.02
4
485.6
14
5
566.6
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY4 2017)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021-01-0011
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0012
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0013
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0014
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0015
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
3
1
1
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
5
5
5
4
4
4
2
2
2
1
1
1
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
7
1
1
3
1
11
4
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
1
1
1
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
Pinus
pine
Tree
5
7
5
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
2
5
5 1
5
3 1
3
3
3
3
3
1 4
4
4
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
1
1 1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
4
4
4
4
4
4
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
Shrub
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
5
Salix sericea
silky willow
Shrub
Taxodium distichum
I bald cypress
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
5 1
5
10
10 1
10
7
7
7
Stem count 11
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count 4
Stems per ACRE 445.2
11
1
0.02
4
445.2
19
6
768.9
16
5
647.5
16
1
0.02
5
647.5
30
12147.5
7La�
16
16
1
02
6
24
8
971.2
15
3
607
15
1
0.02
3
607
27
5
1093
15
5
607
15
1
0.02
5
607
25
8
1012
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY4 2017)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021-01-0016
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0017
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0018
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0019
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0020
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
6
6
6
2
2
2
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
3
2
4
1
6 1
5
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
Pinus
pine
Tree
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
6
6
6
1
1
1
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
4
4
4
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
1
1
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
Shrub
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
Salix sericea
silky willow
Shrub
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
ITree
10
10
10
5
5
5
4 1
4 1
4
7 1
7
1 7
Stem count 14
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count5
Stems per ACRE 566.6
14
1
0.02
5
566.6
17
6
688
16
5
647.5
16
1
0.02
5
647.5
18 12
6 4
728.4 485.6
12
1
0.02
4
485.6
16
5
647.5
14 1
4
566.6 1566.6
14
1
0.02
4
20
5
809.4
15 1
5
607 1
15
1
0.02
5
607
1 20
6
809.4
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY4 2017)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021-01-0021
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0022
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0023
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0024
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0025
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
1
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
5
5
5
3
3
3
6
6
6
3
3
3
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
3
1
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
Pinus
pine
Tree
4
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
7
7
7
4
4
4
4
4
4
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
2
2
2
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
2
2
2
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
Shrub
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
1
Salix sericea
silky willow
Shrub
Taxodium distichum
I bald cypress
ITree
5
5
5
7
7
7
3
3
3
4
4
4
6
6
6
Stem count 13
size (ares)
size(ACRES)i
Species counti 3 1
Stems per ACRE 526.11526.11526
13
1
0.02
3
13
1 3
1
16
5 1
647.5
16
1
0.02
5 1
647.5
20
6
809.4
14 1
4
566.6
14 1
1
0.02
4
566.6
15
5
607
17
5
688
17
1
0.02
5
688
20
6
809.4
15
4
607
15
1
0.02
4
607
17
6
688
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY4 2017)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021-01-0026
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0027
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0028
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0029
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0030
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
3
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
Pinus
pine
Tree
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
4
4
4
1
1
1
8
8
8
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
4
4
4
1
1
1
4
4
4
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
Shrub
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
8
1
Salix sericea
silky willow
Shrub
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
3
3
3
9
9
9
1
1
1
6
6
6
3
3
3
Stem count 11
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count 5
Stems per ACRE 445.2
11
1
0.02
5
445.2
11
5
1445.21647.5
16
1
1 5
1647.5
16
1
0.02
5
1647.5
16
5
13
6
526.1
13
1
0.02
6
526.1
24
8
971.2
12
6 1
485.6 1485.6
12
1
0.02
6
1526.11
13
7
17
5
688 1
17
1
0.02
5
688 1
17
5
688
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY4 2017)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021-01-0031
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0032
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0033
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0034
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0035
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
2
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
3
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
1
5
5
6
2
2
2
2
2
2
1 2
2
2
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
1
1
6
1
2
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
Pinus
pine
Tree
15
2
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
4
4
4
2
2
2
4 1
4
4
1
1
1
7
7
7
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
4
4 1
4
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
Shrub
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
5
4
Salix sericea
silky willow
Shrub
Taxodium distichum
I bald cypress
Tree
2 1
2
2
7
7
7
44
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
Stem count 16
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count 7
Stems per ACRE 647.5
16
1
0.02
7
647.5
21
8
849.8
19
5
768.9
19
1
0.02
5
768.9
25
7
1012
18
7
728.4
18
1
0.02
7
728.4
29
10
1174
16
6
1647.5 1647.51
16
1
0.02
6
33
8
1335
19
5
1768.9 1768.9
19
1
0.02
5
1849.81
21
6
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY4 2017)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021-01-0036
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0037
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0038
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0039
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0040
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
2
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
Pinus
pine
Tree
9
9
7
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
6 1
6
6
5
5
5
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
Shrub
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
14
Salix sericea
silky willow
Shrub
Taxodium distichum
I bald cypress
ITree
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
5
5
4
4
4
5
5 1
5
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
17
7
688
17
1
0.02
7
688
27
9
1 1093
12
6
485.6
12
1
0.02
6
485.6
12
6
485.6
9
3
364.2
9
1
0.02
3
364.2 1364.21
9
3
15
5
607 1
15
1
0.02
5
607
24
6
1971.2
17
6
688 1
17 1
1
0.02
6
688 1
40
9
1619
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY4 2017)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021-01-0041
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0042
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0043
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0044
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0045
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
1
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
1
6
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
1
1
1
6
6
6
2
2
2
8
8
8
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
1
Pinus
pine
Tree
19
20
1
20
76
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
Shrub
1
1
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
Salix sericea
silky willow
Shrub
Taxodium distichum
I bald cypress
ITree
6 1
6 1
6
1 1
1 1
1
4
4
4
6 1
6 1
6
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
15
6
607
15
1
0.02
6
607
15
6
607
12 1
5
485.6
12
1
0.02
5
485.6
32
7
1295
12
4
485.6
12
1
0.02
4
485.6
33
6
1335
15
5
607
15
1
0.02
5
607 1
35
6
1416
13
5
1526.11
13
1
0.02
5
526.11
97
9
3925
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY4 2017)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021-01-0046
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0047
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0048
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0049
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0050
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0051
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
3
3
3
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
3
3
3
6
6
6
4
4
4
3
3
3
2
2
2
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
1 1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
1 2
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
1
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
1
Pinus
pine
Tree
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
3 1
3
3
5
5
5
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3 1
3
3
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
2
1
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
Shrub
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
Salix sericea
silky willow
Shrub
Taxodium distichum
I bald cypress
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Stem count 13
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count 6
Stems per ACRE 1526.11
13
1
0.02
6
526.11
15
8
607
8
1
1 3
1323.7 1323.7
8 1
1
0.02
3 1
1
8
3
323.7
14
5
566.6
14
1
0.02
1 5 1
1566.6 1566.61445.2
14
5
11
5
1445.21445.21
11
1
0.02
5 1
11
5
17
1 7 1
688 1
17
1
0.02
7
688
19
8
1768.91
17
1 7
688 1
17
1
0.02
7
688
18
8
728.4
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
MY4 (2017)
PnoLS P -all T
MY3 (2016)
PnoLS P -all T
MY2 (2015)
PnoLS P -all T
MY1 (2014)
PnoLS P -all I T
MYO (2014)
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
8
3
2
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
3
4
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
32
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
98
98
98
102
102
102
104
104
104
106
106
106
106
106
106
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
I
I
1
1
2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
117
117
118
119
119
119
123
123
125
124
124
124
126
126
126
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
135
184
86
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
13
13
13
13
13
13
14
14
14
25
25
25
20
20
20
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
53
53
54
54
54
54
59
59
59
64
64
64
60
60
60
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
7
7
9
8
8
8
8
8
8
9
9
9
10
10
10
Pinus
pine
Tree
1
232
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
117
117
118
123
123
126
128
128
128
124
124
124
124
124
124
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
57
57
57
60
60
60
77
77 1
77
91
91
91
108
108
108
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
12
12
13
12
12
12
12
12
12
14
14
14
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
71
71
79
77
77
79
97
97
97
104
104
104
125
125
125
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
1
4
1
1
7
1
1
3
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
Shrub
2
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
38
13
Salix sericea
silky willow
Shrub
3
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
186
186
186
189
189
189
190
190
190
189
189
189
206
206
206
Stem count 732
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count11
Stems per ACRE 580.8
732
51
1.26
11
580.8
1167
17
926
758
11
601.5
758
51
1.26
11 1
601.5 1797.5
1005
16
813
11
645.1
813
51
1.26
11
645.1
910
15
722.11674.51674.51674.51702.21702.21
850
10
850
51
1.26
10
850
10
885
9 1
885
51
1.26
9
885
9
702.2
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

APPENDIX 4. Morphological Summary Data and Plots

Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Devils Racetrack- West
Parameter
Gage
Pre -Restoration Condition
Devil's Racetrack - West
Scout
West
I
Scout
East
2
Reference Reach Data
Scout West 2
Johanna
Creek
Jarman
Oak
Devil's
Design
r-
r-
As-Built/Baseline
Devil's
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
4.8
8.0
2.6
6.3
4.7
6.1
5.6
7.6
9.7
9.3
9.0
11.5
4.7
9.6
7.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
7.8
18.0
>20
>50
>50
>75
>150
100
300
100
300
>200
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.8
1.2
0.3
0.5
1.1
1.3
0.7
1.0
0.8
1.2
0.6
0.8
0.4
0.9
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth
1.3
1.6
0.5
0.7
1.7
1.8
1.2
1.3
1.1
2.3
0.9 1
1.1
1.1
F
1.5
1.1
1.4
0.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftz
N/A
5.7
6.3
1.3
2.0
6.0
6.9
5.3
5.4
7.2
7.8
11.6
5.8
9.5
2.1
8.5
4.0
Width/Depth Ratio
4.0
10.5
5.4
19.4
3.6
5.4
5.7
11.0
10.1
19.7
7.4
14.0
14.5
14.0
10.6
14.8
14.5
Entrenchment Ratio
1.6
2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
8.0
9.6
16.1
26.9
11.1
33.3
8.7
26.1
>20.9
>42.5
>26.1
Bank Height Ratio
1.9
4.5
1.1
1.3
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
0.464
N/A
N/A
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
3.7
86.8
7.4
54.2
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
---
0.026
1
0.047
N/A
0.033
1
0.051
N/A
0.0129
0.0036 1
0.0277
0.0023
1
0.0072
0.0013
0.0593
0.0008
0.0195
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
5.5
63.1
18.7
72.9
Pool Max Depth (ft)
N/A
1.2
0.6
N/A
1.7
1.9
1.5
3.1
0.9
2.1
1.1
2.5
1.1
2.9
1.4
1.9
Pool Spacing (ft)
---
27
67
N/A
21
27
16
1
59
32
55
14
63
18
81
9
132
38
104
Pool VolUme ft3
Pattern
_01110111
-
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
---
8.7
14.3
7.2
16.2
9.1
9.8
14.0
20.0
21.0
36.0
12.0
72.0
15.0
92.0
13.0
53.0
16.0
73.0
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
3.1
9.0
5.5
16.0
5.4
6.8
15.0
27.0
13.7
18.6
14.0
43.0
17.0
55.0
12.0
40.0
17.0
35.0
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
N/A
---
0.6
1.6
1.0
3.0
0.8
1.0
1.5
2.8
1.5
2.0
1.5
4.8
1.5
4.8
2.6
4.2
2.2
4.5
Meander Length (ft)
---
39.8
84.8
36.5
63.2
32.5
36.9
50.0
N/A
27
153
35
196
52
133
70
137
Meander Width Ratio
---
1.6
2.6
1.3
3.0
1.4
1.5
1.4
2.1
2.3
2.9
1.3
8.0
1.3
8.0
2.8
5.5
2.1
9.5
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
0.168/0.33/0.464/1.23/2.0/9.6
---
---
---
---
N/A
Shear Stress Com etenc Ib/ftz
N/A
0.18
0.23
---
---
N/A
:=N/AReach
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
I AL
Stream Power (Capacity) W/mz
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
0.77
0.06
0.67
0.34
0.90
1.27
0.60
0.70
0.60
0.70
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
<1%
---
---
---
---
---
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
Rosgen Classification
Gc5
E/C5b
E5
E5
ES/C5
E6
E/C5
E/C5
E/C5
C
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
1.5
1.8
1.3
2.0
2.5
2.9
1.2
1.2
1.8
1.9
0.95
1.7
1.2
1.2
4.8
3.3
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
9.2
10.6
2.6
17.5
6.4
14.0
11.0
10.0
13.0
10.0
13.0
Q-NFF regression
---
Q-USGS extrapolation
N/A
---
Q-Mannings
--
Valley Length ft
---
---
---
--
---
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
4,976
---
---
---
---
---
4,245
966
4,239
962
Sinuosity
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.2
1.6
1.2
1.6
1.2
1.4
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.0054
0.0015
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)l
0.0041
0.0260
0.0170
0.0040
0.0022
0.0040
0.0025
0.0087
0.0016
F
0.0022
0.0053
1
0.0054
0.0017
1
0.0023
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable

Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Devils Racetrack- East
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
Gage
Pre -Restoration Condition
Devil's Racetrack - East
Min Max
Scout
Min
West I
Max
Scout
Min
East
I
2
Max
Reference Reach Data
Scout West 2
Min I Max I
Johanna
Min
Creek
I
Max
Jarman
Min
•.
I
Max
Devil's
Min
I
Max
Design
r
Min I Max
r
Min I Max
I Min
F
Max
As-Built/Baseline
.-
Min Max
Devil'sParameter
Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.1
10.4
2.6
6.3
4.7
6.1
5.6
7.6
9.7
9.3
13.0
8.0
8.0
12.2
13.7
8.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
14.2
18.6
>20
>50
>50
>75
>150
100
500
100
1
500
100 500
>300
>300
---
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.0
1.8
0.3
0.5
1.1
1.3
0.7
1.0
0.8
1.2
1.0
0.6
---
0.8
1.1
0.7
---
Bankfull Max Depth
2.1
2.8
0.5
0.7
1.7
1.8
1.2
1.3
1.1
2.3
1.4
1.8
0.8
1.0
0.9
1.3
1.7
1.1
---
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftz
N/A
14.2
19.1
1.3
2.0
6.0
6.9
5.3
5.4
7.2
7.8
11.6
12.8
4.8
---
10.3
13.9
5.7
---
Width/Depth Ratio
5.0
7.8
5.4
19.4
3.6
5.4
5.7
11.0
10.1
19.7
7.4
13.0
13.5
14.0
14.5
---
12.1
14.6
11.9
---
Entrenchment Ratio
1.6
1.8
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
8.0
9.6
16.1
1
26.9
7.7
38.5
12.5
1
62.6
---
>21.9
>24.5
>36.5
---
Bank Height Ratio
2.6
4.3
1.1
1.3
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.1
---
1.0
1.0
---
D50 (mm)
0.179
JL
N/A
N/A
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
13.0
80.1
20.8
42.4
11.3
25.9
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
---
7
N/A
0.033
0.051
N/A
0.0129
0.0007
0.0025
0.0377
0.0671
--
0.0004
0.0099
0.0192
0.0318
0.0072
0.0675
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
16.0
77.3
16.5
66.1
13.0
34.2
Pool Max Depth (ft)
N/A
---
[LO.6
N/A
1.7
1.9
1.5
3.1
1.4
3.2
0.8
2.0
1.2
1.9
3.4
1.7
2.7
1.4
2.5
Pool Spacing (ft)
---
N/A
21
27
16
59
32
55
21
91
39
64
---
26
131
43
73
25
70
Pool Volume(ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
---
8.7
14.3
7.2
16.2
9.1
9.8
14.0
20.0
21.0
36.0
17.0
65.0
10.0
40.0
---
15.0
55.0
21
41
1232
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
3.1
9.0
5.5
16.0
5.4
6.8
15.0
27.0
13.7
18.6
20.0
62.0
12.0
36.0
---
18.0
65.0
12
26
10
35
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
N/A
---
0.6
1.6
1.0
3.0
0.8
1.0
1.5
2.8
1.5
2.0
1.5
4.8
1.5
4.5
---
1.5
4.7
1.5
3.2
---
Meander Length (ft)
---
39.8
84.8
36.5
63.2
32.5
36.9
50.0
N/A
39
221
64
136
---
62
203
101
140
52
1 112
Meander Width Ratio
---
1.6
2.6
1.3
3.0
1.4
1.5
1.4
2.1
2.3
2.9
1.3
5.0
1.3
5.0
---
1.2
4.0
2.6
5.0
---
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
-/-/0.179/0.642/1.0/9.6
---
---
---
---
---
N/A
N/A
N/A
Reach Shear Stress Com etenc Ib/
N/A
0.01
N/A
N/A
N/A
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (Capacity)W/mz
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
1.30
0.06
0.67
0.34
0.90
1.27
1.14
1.30
---
1.14
1.30
--
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
<1%
---
---
---
---
---
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
Rosgen Classification
Gc5
E/C5b
ES
ES
ES/CS
E6
E/C5
E/C5
E/C5
C
C
---
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
0.3
0.4
1.3
2.0
2.5
2.9
1.2
1.2
1.8
1.9
0.95
1.2
3.5
---
1.2
1.6
3.0
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
8.5
2.6
17.5
6.4
14.0
11.0
16.0
17.0
---
16.0
17.0
---
Q-NFF regression
---
Q-USGS extrapolation
N/A
---
Q-Mannings
---
Valley Length ft
---
---
---
---
--
---
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
4,844
---
---
---
---
---
4,840
313
385
4,833
310
372
Sinuosity
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.1
1.3
1.1
1.2
---
1.1
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2
---
---
---
---0.0007
--
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0003
0.0260
0.0170
0.0040
0.0022
0.0040
0.0004
0.0008
0.0224
0.0251
---0.0007
0.0008
0.0153
0.0166
0.0219
0.0231
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable

Table 10c. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Southeast Branch
14000prL.-
Gage
Pre -Restoration Condition
Southeast Branch
IUL Scout
West
1
Scout
East
2
Reference Reach Data
Scout West 2
Johanna
Creek
Jarman
O.
r
IN Southeast
Branch
Design
Southeast Branch
Southeast
Branch
Southeast
Branch
As-Built/Baseline
Southeast Branch
Southeast
Branch
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
2.7
5.7
2.6
6.3
4.7
6.1
5.6
7.6
9.7
9.3
3.0
4.0
5.4
3.0
3.8
5.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
8.6
11.4
>20
>50
>50
>75
>150
25
F
35
50
1
70
100
1 300
>30
>60
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.2
0.4
0.3
0.5
1.1
1.3
0.7
1.0
0.8
1.2
0.5
0.6
1.0
0.3
0.4
0.4
Bankfull Max Depth
0.4
1.4
0.5
0.7
1.7
1.8
1.2
1.3
1.1
2.3
0.4
T
0.6
0.5
1
0.7
0.8
1 1.2
0.5
0.5
0.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
N/A
1.1
1.4
1.3
2.0
6.0
6.9
5.3
5.4
7.2
7.8
11.6
1.0
1.5
2.5
0.8
1.3
2.1
Width/Depth Ratio
6.8
24.3
5.4
19.4
3.6
5.4
5.7
11.0
10.1
19.7
7.4
9.0
10.0
10.0
12.0
11.0
12.0
11.4
10.8
13.8
Entrenchment Ratio
1.5
4.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
8.0
9.6
16.1
1
26.9
8.3
11.7
12.5
17.5
18.5
55.6
>9.9
>15.8
>37.5
Bank Height Ratio
2.2
6.0
1.1
1.3
1.01
.1
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
0.409
N/A
N/A
N/A
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
2.1
64.4
3.4
144.4
6.0
47.3
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
---
0.026
0.047
N/A
0.033
1
0.051
N/A
0.0129
0.0162
0.0681
0.0144
1
0.0384
0.0035
0.0285
0.0010
0.0803
0.0021
0.0272
0.0005
0.0168
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
2.1
36.7
3.1
33.6
3.2
61.3
Pool Max Depth (ft)
N/A
0.4
0.6
N/A
1.7
1.9
1.5
3.1
0.5
1.1
0.4
1.2
0.5
1.5
0.7
1.5
0.5
1.0
0.5
1.1
Pool Spacing (ft)
---
27
67
N/A
21
27
16
59
32
55
15
24
20
32
9
38
4
76
8
90
14
52
Pool Volume ft3)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
---
8.7
14.3
7.2
1
16.2
9.1
9.8
14.0
20.0
21.0
36.0
4.0
9.0
5.0
12.0
7.0
43.0
5.3
11.2
6.8
14.3
12.7
32.8
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
3.1
9.0
5.5
16.0
5.4
6.8
15.0
27.0
13.7
18.6
5.0
14.0
6.0
18.0
8.0
26.0
5.0
23.5
10.0
25.6
10.4
29.5
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
N/A
---
0.6
1.6
1.0
3.0
0.8
1.0
1.5
2.8
1.5
2.0
1.5
4.5
1.5
4.5
1.5
4.8
1.7
7.8
2.6
6.7
2.0
5.6
Meander Length (ft)
---
39.8
84.8
36.5
63.2
32.5
36.9
50.0
N/A
24
51
32
68
16
92
22
63
33
70
32
74
Meander Width Ratio
---
1.6
2.6
1.3
3.0
1.4
1.5
1.4
2.1
2.3
2.9
1.3
3.0
1.3
3.0
1.3
8.0
1.8
3.7
1.8
3.8
2.4
6.2
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
N/A
0.08/0.28/0.41/0.94/1.6/9.6
---
---
---
---
---
N/A
N/A
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft'
0.51
--
--
--
N/A
N/A
N/A
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power Ca acit W/m2
im
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
0.19
0.06
0.67
0.34
0.90
1.27
0.03
0.07
0.10
0.03
0.07
0.10
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
<1%
---
---
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
Rosgen Classification
G/F5
E/CSb
ES
ES
ES/C5
E6
---
---
E/C5
E/C5
E/C5
E/C5
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
2.2
1.3
2.0
2.5
F
2.9
1.2
1.2
1.8
1.9
0.95
1.7
1.4
1.4
1.9
1.5
1.4
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
2.4
2.6
17.5
6.4
14.0
11.0
1.5
2.0
3.0
1.5
2.0
3.0
Q-NFF regression
---
Q-USGS extrapolation
N/A
---
Q-Mannings
---
--Va
ey Length t
Valley
---
---
---
--
---
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
2,976
---
---
---
---
---
1,559
716
617
1,559
713
616
Sinuosity
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.1
1.2
1.1
F
1.2
1.2
1.6
1.6
1
1.1
1.3
Water Surface Slope ft/ft 2
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.0221
0.0174
0.0030
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0230
0.0260
0.0170
0.0040
0.0022
0.0040
0.0108
0.0227
0.0096
0.0128
0.0025
0.0089
0.0222
0.0015
0.0119
0.0028
0.0030
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable

Table 10d. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Middle Branch
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
Gage
Pre -Restoration Condition
Middle Branchma
Scout West I
an
Scout East 2
Reference Reach Data
Scout West 2
Md A.
Johanna creek
an
Jarman
Oak
AN
Middle Branch
(Reach 1)
Design
Middle Branch
(Reach 2)
Middle Branch
(Reach 1)
As-Built/Baseline
Middle
(Reach
BranchA
2)
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min Max
Min Max Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
1.8
2.3
2.6 6.3
4.7 6.1
5.6 7.6
9.7
9.3
3.0
4.0
2.2
3.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
4.6
6.8
>20
>50
>50
>75
>150
40 1
60
100 F
300
>50
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.2
0.3
0.3 0.5
1.1 1.3
0.7 1.0
0.8
1.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth
0.3
0.6
0.5 0.7
1.7 1.8
1.2 1.3
1.1
2.3
0.4 F
0.5
0.5 1
0.6
0.5
0.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
N/A
0.4
0.5
1.3 2.0
6.0 6.9
5.3 5.4 7.2
7.8
11.6
0.9
1.5
0.7
1.1
Width/Depth Ratio
6.9
12.0
5.4 19.4
3.6 5.4
5.7 11.0 10.1
19.7
7.4
10.0
10.5
10.0
12.0
6.7
10.1
Entrenchment Ratio
2.0
3.8
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
8.0
9.6
16.1
26.9
33.3
100.0
22.2
66.7
>22.9
>58.8
Bank Height Ratio
5.3
6.5
1.1 1.3
1.0
1.1 1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1 1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
0.083
N/A
N/A
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
2.5
46.6 7.9
16.1
Shallow Slope(ft/ft)
---
0.026 1 0.047
N/A
0.033 1 0.051N/A
0.0129
0.0144 1
0.0489
0.0002 1
0.0074
0.0008
0.0492 0.0059
0.0236
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
2.9
17.3 11.2
19.8
Pool Max Depth (ft)
N/A
---
0.6
N/A
1.7 1.9L16
1.5
3.1
0.4
1.0
0.5
1.0
0.5
1.2 0.6
0.9
Pool Spacing (ft)
---
27 67
N/A
21 27
59
32
55
15
24
5
22
8
56 18
24
Pool Volume ft3
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
I
---
8.7 1 14.3
1 7.2 1 16.2
1 9.1 1 9.8 1 14.0
1
20.0
21.0
36.0
4.0
9.0
6.0
36.0
4.1
9.4 6.7
20.9
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
3.1 9.0
5.5 16.0
5.4 6.8 15.0
27.0
13.7
18.6
5.0
14.0
7.0
22.0
7.0
23.9 9.2
23.5
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
N/A
---
0.6 1.6
1.0 3.0
0.8 1.0 1.5
2.8
1.5
2.0
1.7
4.5
1.5
4.8
3.2
10.9 2.7
6.9
Meander Length (ft)
---
39.8 84.8
36.5 63.2
32.5 36.9
50.0
N/A
24
51
14
77
23
44 32
57
Meander Width Ratio
---
1.6 2.6
1.3 3.0
1.4 1.5 1.4
2.1
2.3
2.9
1.3
3.0
1.3
8.0
2.2
4.3 2.0
6.1
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%'jl
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
N/A
-/-/0.083/0.498/0.9/9.6
---
---
---
---
---
N/A
N/A
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib/ft2
0.24
0.27
N/A
N/A
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power Ca acit W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
0.02
0.06
0.67
0.34
0.90
1.27
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
<1%
---
---
---
---
---
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
Rosgen Classification
G5
E/CSb
ES
E5
ES/C5
E6
N/A
E/C5
E/C5
E/C5
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
1.4
1.5
1.3 F 2.0
2.5 1 2.9
1.2 1 1.2 1.8
1
1.9
0.95
1.3
0.8
1.4
0.9
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
0.6
0.7
2.6
17.5
6.4
14.0
11.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Q-NFF regression
---
Q-USGS extrapolation
N/A
---
Q-Mannings
---
--Va
Valley
ey Length t
---
---
---
--
---
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,736
---
---
---
---
---
1,060
436
1,058
432
Sinuosity
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.5
1.1
1.2
Water Surface Slope ft/ft 2
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.0145
0.0064
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0240
0.0260
0.0170
0.0040
0.0022
0.0040
0.0096
0.0163
0.0024
0.0077
0.0148
0.0024
0.0066
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable

Table 10e. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Southwest Branch
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
Gage
Pre -Restoration Condition
Southwest Branch
Scout West
1
Scout East
2
Reference Reach Data
Scout West 2
Johanna Creek
Jarman
Oak
Southwest
Branch
(Reachesl
-3)
Design
Southwest
Branch
(Reach 4)
Southwest
(Reaches
Branch
1-3)
As-Built/Baseline
Southw
(Rea
�Branch
Min
Max
Min
Max Min
Max
Min
Max Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
2.8
3.4
2.6
6.3 4.7
6.1
5.6
7.6
9.7
9.3
3.0
3.3
---
2.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
4.9
6.2
>20
>50
>50
>75
>150
40
60
100
300
---
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.5 1.1
1.3
0.7
1.0
0.8
1.2
0.3
0.3
---
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth
0.3
0.9
0.5
0.7 1.7
1.8
1.2
1.3
1.1
2.3
0.5 1
0.6
0.4 F
0.5
---
0.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft')
N/A
0.8
0.9
1.3
2.0 6.0
6.9
5.3
5.4 7.2
7.8
11.6
1.0
1.0
---
0.6
Width/Depth Ratio
10.0
14.0
5.4
19.4 3.6
5.4
5.7
11.0 10.1
19.7
7.4
9.0
10.0
10.0
12.0
---
9.7
Entrenchment Ratio
1.5
1.9
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
8.0
9.6
16.1
26.9
13.3
20.0
30.3
90.9
82.3
Bank Height Ratio
10.0
10.7
1.1
1.3
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.1
---
1.0
D50 (mm)
0.105
---
N/A
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
---
---
---
---1L3.1
-
---
---
3.8
51.6
8.3
44.1
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
---
0.026
0.047
N/A
0.033
0.051
N/A
129
0.0257
0.0648
0.0109
0.0308
0.0015
0.0339
0.0032
0.0228
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
----
---
---
1.7
19.9
4.3
23.4
Pool Max Depth (ft)
N/A
---
0.6
N/A
1.7
1.9
1.5
0.5
1.1
0.4
1.0
0.3
1.2
0.6
1.4
PoolSpacing(ft)
---
27
67
N/A
21
27 16
S955
15
24
5
23
8
53
12
51
Pool Volume ft3
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
I
---
8.7 1
14.3 1 7.2
1
16.2
1 9.1 1
9.8 1 14.0
1
20.0
21.0
36.0
4.0
9.0
4.0
26.0
3.9
10.2
5.2
18.9
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
3.1
9.0 5.5
16.0
5.4
6.8 15.0
27.0
13.7
18.6
5.0
14.0
5.0
16.0
10.0
19.0
7.4
20.3
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
N/A
---
0.6
1.6 1.0
3.0
0.8
1.0 1.5
2.8
1.5
2.0
1.7
4.5
1.5
4.8
---
3.1
8.5
Meander Length (ft)
---
39.8
84.8 36.5
63.2
32.5
36.9
50.0
N/A
24
51
10
56
27
50
28
54
Meander Width Ratio
---
1.6
2.6 1.3
3.0
1.4
1.5 1.4
2.1
2.3
2.9
1.3
3.0
1.3
8.0
---
2.2
7.9
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
so
W
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
N/A
-/0.065/0.105/0.336/0.4/9.6
---
---
---
---
---
N/A
N/A
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft'
0.37
0.42
---
---
N/A
N/A
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power Ca acit W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
0.03
0.06
0.67
0.34
0.90
1.27
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
<1%
---
---
---
---
---
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
Rosgen Classification
G5
E/CSb
ES
ES
E5/CS
E6
NA
E/CS
N/A
E/C5
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
1.8
1.9
1.3
2.0 2.5
2.9
1.2
1.2 1.8
1.9
0.95
1.7
1.3
N/A
2.5
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
1.6
1.7
2.6
17.5
6.4
14.0
11.0
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
Q-NFF regression
---
Q-USGS extrapolation
N/A
---
Q-Mannings
---
--Va
ey Length t
Valley
---
---
---
--
---
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,080
---
---
---
---
---
650
482
646
479
Sinuosity
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.1 1
1.2
1.1
1.5
1.0
1.3
Water Surface Slope ft/ft 2
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.0191
0.0090
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0320
0.0260
0.0170
0.0040
0.0022
0.0040
0.0171
0.0216
0.0078
0.0096
0.0186
0.0191
0.0085
0.0088
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable

Table 10f. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
North Branch
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
Gage
Pre -Restoration Condition
North Branch
Scout West
I
Scout East
2
Reference Reach Data
Scout West 2
Johanna Creek
Jarman
Oak
Design
North Branch
As-Built/Baseline
North Branch
Min Max
Min
Max Min
I
Max
Min I
Max Min
I
Max
Min
I
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
---
2.6
6.3 4.7
6.1
5.6
7.6
9.7
9.3
9.2
8.6
9.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
---
>20
>50
>50
>75
>150
100 1
300
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
---
0.3
0.5 1.1
1.3
0.7
1.0
0.8
1.2
0.6
0.7
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth
---
0.5
0.7 1.7
1.8
1.2
1.3
1.1
2.3
0.9 F
1.1
1.0
1.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
N/A
---
1.3
2.0 6.0
6.9
5.3
5.4 7.2
7.8
11.6
5.9
5.7
6.5
Width/Depth Ratio
---
5.4
19.4 3.6
5.4
5.7
11.0 10.1
19.7
7.4
14.0
14.5
13.1
13.2
Entrenchment Ratio
---
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
8.0
9.6
16.1
26.9
10.9
32.6
>21.6
>23.2
Bank Height Ratio
---
1.1
1.3
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
D50 (mm)
---
N/A
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
5.3
35.8
Shallow Slope(ft/ft)
---
0.026 1
0.047
N/A
0.033 1
0.051
N/A
0.0129
0.0010
0.0065
0.0013
0.0163
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
8.5
80.8
Pool Max Depth (ft)
N/A
---
0.6
N/A
1.7
1.9
1.5
3.1
0.9
2.1
1.0
3.8
Pool Spacing (ft)
---
27
67
N/A
21
27 16
59
32
55
15
64
17
101
Pool Volume(ft')
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
---
8.7
14.3 7.2
16.2
9.1
9.8 14.0
20.0
21.0
36.0
12.0
74.0
16
72
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
3.1
9.0 5.5
16.0
5.4
6.8 15.0
27.0
13.7
18.6
14.0
44.0
15
40
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
N/A
---
0.6
1.6 1.0
3.00.8
1.0 1.5
2.8
1.5
2.0
1.5
4.8
1.7
4.3
Meander Length (ft)
---
39.8
84.8 36.5
63.2
32.5
36.9
50.0
N/A
28
156
79
129
Meander Width Ratio
---
1.6
2.6 1.3
3.0
1.4
1.5 1.4
F
2.1
2.3
2.9
1.3
8.0
1.9
7.7
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
N/A
---
---
---
---
---
---
N/A
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft'
---
---
N/A
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (Capacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
0.08
0.06
0.67
0.34
0.90
1.27
0.19
0.19
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
<1%
---
---
---
---
---
<1%
<1%
Rosgen Classification
N/A
E/CSb
ES
ES
ES/C5
E6
E/C5
C5
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
---
1.3
2.0 2.5
2.9
1.2
1.2 1.8
1.9
0.95
0.9
0.8
0.9
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
---
2.6
17.5
6.4
14.0
11.0
5.0
5.0
Q-NFF regression
---
Q-USGS extrapolation
N/A
---
Q-Mannings
---
--Va
Valley
ey Length t
---
---
---
--
---
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
2,418
2,410
Sinuosity
---
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.2 F
1.6
1.31
Water Surface Slope ft/ft 2
---
---
---
---
---
---
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
---
0.0260
0.0170
0.0040
0.0022
0.0040
f0.0016
0.0007
0.0020
0.0004
1
0.0020
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable

Table Ila. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Section)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Devil's Racetrack (West)
Dimension and Substrate Base
MYl
Cross
MY2
Section
MY3
1 (Shallow)
MY4 MYS
MY6 MY7 Base
MYl
Cross
MY2
Section
MY3
2 (Pool)
MY4 MYS
MY6 MY7 Base
MYl
Cross
MY2
Section
MY3
3 (Shallow)
MY4 MYS
MY6 MY7 Base
MYl
Cross
MY2
Section
MY3
4 (Pool)
MY4 MYS MY6 MY7
based on fixed bankfull elevation 135.4
135.4
135.4
135.4
135.4
135.1
135.1
135.1
135.1
135.1
131.0
131.0
131.0
131.0
131.0
130.6
130.6
130.6
130.6
130.6
Bankfull Width (ft) 9.6
7.6
7.7
7.6
7.8
10.7
10.1
10.2
9.8
9.2
9.5
10.0
10.0
10.0
9.3
11.1
11.4
11.4
11.4
11.2
Floodprone Width (ft) >200
>200
>200
>200
>200
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.6
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.8
1.0
0.8
0.9
0.8
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.1
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.7
1.9
2.0
1.9
2.0
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft) 6.2
5.6
5.8
5.8
5.3
7.8
7.6
8.6
8.1
8.1
8.5
8.1
8.2
7.4
7.1
10.7
9.4
9.9
8.6
8.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratia 14.8
10.4
10.1 1
10.0 1
11.5
14.6 1
13.4 1
12.2 1
12.0 1
10.6
. I
. 112.2
1
13.5 1
12.1
11.4
13.9 1
13.1 1
15.1 1
15.6
Entrenchment Ratio' >20.9 1 >26.2 1 >26.1 1 >26.3 1 >25.7 1
N/A I
N/A I
N/A I
N/A I
N/A I
>21.1 >20.0 1 >20.1 1 >20.0 1 >21.5 1 1
1 N/A
N/A I
N/A I
N/A I
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1. -OL
-1 -0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Dimension and Substrate Base
MYl
Cross
MY2
Section
MY3
5 (Pool)
MY4 MYS
MY6 MY7 Base
MYS
Cross
MY2
Section
MY3
6 (Shallow)
MY4 MYS
MY6 MY7 Base
MYS
Cross
MY2
Section
MY3
7 (Pool)
MY4 MYS
MY6 MY7
Base
MYS
Cross
MY2
Section
MY3
8 (Shallow)
MY4 MYS MY6 MY7
based on fixed bankfull elevation 125.3
125.3
125.3
125.3
125.3
124.7
124.7
124.7
124.7
124.7
120.8
120.8
120.8
120.8
120.8
119.9
119.9
119.9
119.9
119.9
Bankfull Width (ft) 8.9
8.6
8.6
8.6
9.3
8.7
8.2
8.6
8.5
8.0
9.5
8.0
8.0
8.7
8.7
4.7
4.8
4.8
4.2
4.2
Floodprone Width(ft) N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.4
0.7
1.2
0.8
1.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.6
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.8
1.3
1.3
1.7
1.2
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft) 7.5
7.0
6.8
6.2
6.5
6.0
5.3
5.6
5.2
4.3
7.6
7.4
7.3
7.0
7.0
2.1
3.3
5.7
3.3
4.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratia 10.7
10.6
10.9
11.9
13.4
12.6
12.6
13.4
14.0
14.7
11.7
8.7
8.8
10.8
10.8
10.6
6.9
4.0
5.4
4.0
Entrenchment Ratio' N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>23.0 >24.4 >23.2 >23.5 >25.1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>42.5 >42.1 >41.9 >47.4 >474
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.o
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Section 9 (Shallow)
Dimension and Substrate Base MY1-M--YF MY3 MY4 MY5
based on fixed bankfull elevation 116.4 116.4 116.4 116.4 116.4
Bankfull Width (ft) 7.7 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5
Floodprone Width (ft) >200 >200 >200 >200 >200
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.7 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft) 4.0 5.4 4.9 4.7 4.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratia 14.5 10.4 11.4 12.1 12.4
Entrenchment Ratio' >26.1 >26.7 >26.7 >26.7 >26.7
Bankfull Bank Height RatOl 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1
MY6 MY7 Base
116.1
6.8
N/A
0.6
0.9
4.4
10.6
N/A
1.0 1
MYS
116.1
5.9
N/A
0.8
1.0
4.7
7.5
N/A
1.0 1
Cross
MY2
116.1
5.9
N/A
0.8
1.0
4.6
7.6
N/A
1.0 1
Section
MY3
116.1
6.2
N/A
0.7
1.0
4.5
8.5
N/A
1.0 1
r
91Y4 MY5
116.1
6.0
N/A
0.7
0.9
4.0
9. 0
N/A
.0
MY6 MY7
1Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width
2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel

Table 11b. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Section)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Devil's Racetrack (East)
Dimension and Substrate Base
MYl
Cross
MY2
Section
MY3
11 (Pool)
MY4 -RAYS-
MY6 MY7 Base
MYl
Cross
MY2
Section
MY3
12 (Shallow)
MY4 MYS
MY6 MY7 Base
MYl
Cross
MY2
Section
MY3
13 (Pool)
MY4 MYS
MY6 MY7 Base
MYl
Cross
MY2
Section
MY
14 (Shallow)
MY4 MYS MY6 MY7
based on fixed bankfull elevation 115.4
115.4
115.4
115.4
115.4
115.1
115.1
115.1
115.1
115.1
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
114.6
114.6
114.6
114.6
114.6
Bankfull Width (ft) 15.0
15.1
15.1
15.1
15.1
12.2
12.5
12.3
12.2
12.2
19.8
20.5
20.8
21.1
21.8
12.7
11.8
12.4
12.2
12.0
Floodprone Width (ft) N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.2
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
0.8
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.7
1.5
1.2
1.3
1.1
1.1
1.1
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 2.1
2.0
2.0
2.5
2.0
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.3
2.7
2.5
2.5
2.3
2.5
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.5
1.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft) 18.8
16.5
17.3
16.1
15.9
10.3
8.9
9.3
8.0
8.4
30.2
24.6
26.2
23.2
23.2
13.3
10.4
10.9
10.5
10.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratia 12.0
13.8
13.1
14.2
14.3
14.6
17.6
16.1
18.6
17.6
13.0
17.1
16.6
19.2
20.5
12.1
13.4
14.0
14.1
13.7
Entrenchment Ratio' N/A I
N/A I
N/A I
N/A I
N/A I
>24.5 1 >23.9 1 >24.5 1 >24.5 1 >24.6 1
1 N/A I
N/A I
N/A I
N/A I
N/A I 1
1 >23.7 1 >25.4 1 >24.3 1 >24.6 1 >24.9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
Dimension and Substrate Base
MYS
Cross
MY2
Section
MY3
15 (Pool)
MY4 MYS
MY6 MY7 Base
MYS
Cross
MY2
Section
MY3
16 (Shallow)
MY4 MYS
MY6 MY7 Base
MYS
Cross
MY2
Section
MY3
17 (Shallow)
MY4 -RAYS-
MY6 MY7
Base
MY1
Cross
MY2
Section
MY3
18 (Pool)
MY4 MY5
MY MY7
based on fixed bankfull elevation 114.2
114.2
114.2
114.2
114.2
114.1
114.1
114.1
114.1
114.1
113.3
113.3
113.3
113.3
113.3
112.6
112.6
112.6
112.6
112.6
Bankfull Width (ft) 15.6
12.4
12.4
12.4
12.3
13.4
12.6
12.7
12.4
12.4
13.7
12.5
12.7
12.7
13.6
15.5
15.3
15.3
15.3
15.3
Floodprone Width(ft) N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.1
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.2
1.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 2.1
1.9
1.9
1.8
1.8
1.7
1.8
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
2.1
2.1
2.8
2.7
2.6
2.1
2.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft) 17.3
14.5
14.3
13.5
13.3
13.2
12.0
12.3
11.5
11.3
13.9
12.5
12.7
13.2
13.4
25.0
22.4
21.0
18.8
16.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratia 14.0
10.6
10.7
11.4
11.4
13.6
13.2
13.0
13.4
13.5
13.4
12.5
12.6
12.2
13.8
9.510.
5
11.2
12.4
14.1
Entrenchment Ratio' N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>22.3 >23.9 >23.6 >24.1 >24.3
>21.9 >24.0 >23.6 >23.7 >22.1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0
Dimension and Substrate Base
1.0
MYl
1.0
Cross -Section
MY2
1.0
MY3
1.0
19 (ShallowL.11111L_
MY4 MY5
1.0
MY6 MY7 Base
1.0
MYS
1.0
Cross
MY2
1.0
Section
MY3
1.0
20 (ShallowL.11111h_AN
MY4 MY5
1.0
MY6 MY7 Base
1.0
MY1
1.0
Cross
MY2
1.0
Section
MY3
1.0
21 (Pool)
MY4 MY5
MY6
1.0
MY7
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
based on fixed bankfull elevation 112.7 112.7 112.7 112.7 112.7 109.0 109.0 109.0 109.0 109.0 108.1 108.1 108.1 108.1 108.1
Bankfull Width (ft) 13.3 14.3 14.2 12.6 14.0 8.2 7.9 7.9 8.3 8.2 8.8 8.9 9.1 7.8 7.8
Floodprone Width (ft) >300 >300 >300 >300 >300 >300 >300 >300 >300 >300 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.2 1.1 1.3 1.2 1.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 2.0 1.9 2.1 2.1 2.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft) 12.5 11.2 11.9 9.9 9.6 5.7 5.9 6.1 6.3 6.3 10.8 9.7 11.5 9.4 10.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratia 14.1 18.4 17.1 16.1 20.4 11.9 10.6 10.3 10.9 10.6 7.3 8.1 7.2 6.5 5.7
Entrenchment Ratio' >22.6 >20.9 >21.1 >23.8 >21.5 >36.5 >37.8 >37.8 >36.3 >36.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Bankfull Bank Height RatOl 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0
1Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width
2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel

Table 11c. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Section)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Southeast Branch
Dimension and Substrate
Base
L
MY1
Cross
MY2
section
MY3
28 (Pool) ��
MY4 MYS MY6
MY7 Base
M
MY1
Cross
MY2
section
MY3
29 (Shallow)
MY4 MYS
MY6 MY7 Base
MY1
Cross
MY2
Section
MY3
30 (Pool)
MY4 MYS MY6 MY7
based on fixed bankfull elevation
137.7
137.7
137.7
137.7
137.7
137.1
137.1
137.1
137.1
137.1
122.8
122.8
122.8
122.8
122.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.8
3.3
3.3
3.2
3.3
3.0
2.9
2.6
2.8
2.4
3.8
4.1
3.5
3.5
3.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>30
>30
>30
>30
>30
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.8
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.1
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.4
0.7
0.5
0.4
0.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ftp)
1.5
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.5
0.8
1.1
0.8
0.9
0.7
1.3
1.7
1.1
0.9
0.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.3
6.6
7.1
7.2
7.3
11.4
7.7
8.3
8.2
7.9
11.2
9.4
11.7
13.5
12.7
Entrenchment Ratio'
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>9.9
>10.4
>11.4
>10.9
>12.5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
Dimension and Substrate
1.0
Base
1.0
MYl
1.0
MY2
1.0
MY3
1.0
MY4 MYS MY6
1.0
MY7 Base
1.0
MY1
1.0
MY2
1.0
MY3
1.0
MY4 MY5
1.0
MY6 MY7 Base
1.0
MY1
1.0
MY2
1.0
MY3
1.0
MY4 MYS MY6 MY7
based on fixed bankfull elevation
122.7
122.7
122.7
122.7
122.7
116.5
116.5
116.5
116.5
116.5
116.4
116.4
116.4
116.4
116.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.8
3.9
3.8
2.7
2.4
5.3
5.1
3.9
3.5
3.5
6.3
5.8
5.0
3.6
3.7
Floodprone Width (ft) >60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.5
0.8
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe)
1.3
2.0
1.3
1 0.9
0.7
2.1
1.8 1
1.2 1
1.0 1
0.9
2.4
1.7
1.8
1.1
0.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratiol 10.8
7.8
11.2
8.3 1
T.
13.8
1 14.6
13.0
12.5
13.7 1
16.819.7
13.7
11.6
14.7
Entrenchment Ratio' >15.8 >15.4 >15.8 >22.4 >24.9
>37.5 >38.9 >51.3 >57.9 >56.4
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height RatOl
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1
1.0 1
1.0 1
1.0
1Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width,
2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel

Table lid. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Gross Section)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Middle Branch
Dimension and Substrate Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4 MYS MY6
MY7 Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5
MY6 MY7 Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 I
MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
based on fixed bankfull elevation 136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
124.7
124.7
124.7
124.71
124.7
Bankfull Width (ft) 2.2
2.3
2.2
1.3
1.2
3.1
3.1
3.2
3.0
2.7
4.1
4.8
5.0
5.2
4.4
Floodprone Width (ft) >50
>50
>50
>50
>50
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.5 1
0.6
0.6
0.4 1
0.5
0.7
0.9
0.6
0.8
0.8
.
1 0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe) 0.7
0.8
0.7
0.4
0.4
1.2
1.6
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.0
1.0
1.5
1.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 6.7
6.8
6.8
4.0
3.5
8.1
6.0
9.1
7.6
5.8
11.9
21.9
24.3
17.7
Ratio' >22.9 >21.5 >23.2 >38.4 >42.9
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/ABankfull
#19.7Entrenchment
Bank Height Ratio' 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Dimension and Substrate Base
MYl
rocti1.0
ss
MY2
on
MY3
27 (Shallow)
MY4 MYS MY6
MY7
based on fixed bankfull elevation 124.6 124.6 124.6 124.6 124.6
Bankfull Width (ft) 3.4 3.2 3.1 3.5 2.9
Floodprone Width (ft) >200 >200 >200 >200 >200
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe) 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.3 0.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 10.1 10.7 10.2 9.5 8.7
Entrenchment Ratio' >58.8 >62.5 >64.3 >57.5 >69.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
IEntrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width,
2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel

Table 11e. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Section)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Southwest Branch
Dimension and Substrate
��
Base
MYl
Cross
MY2
Section
MY3
22 (Pool)
MY4 MY5
MY6 MY7 Base
MY3
Cross
MY2
Section
MY3
23 (Shallow) ��
MY4 MYS MY6 MY7
based on fixed bankfull elevation
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
4.9
4.8
5.0
4.5
4.2
2.4
2.9
3.0
2.5
1.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.8
1.0
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ftp)
1.8
1.9
2.1
1.5
1.3
0.6
0.8
0.9
0.7
0.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio13.2
11.9
11.7
13.7
13.2
9.7
11.2
10.1
8.9
12.0
Entrenchment Ratio'
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>82.3
>68.6
>67.5
>79.4
>108.7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel

Table 11f. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Section)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
North Branch
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MYl
Cross
MY2
Section
MY3
34 (Pool) ����Cross
MY4 MYS MY6
MY7 Base
MYl
MY2
Section
MY3
35 (Shallow)
MY4 MYS
MY6 MY7 Base
MYl
Cross
MY2
Section
MY3
36 (Shallow) �
MY4 MYS MY6 MY7
based on fixed bankfull elevation
118.6
118.6
118.6
118.6
118.6
118.73
118.7
118.7
118.7
118.7
116.8
116.8
116.8
116.8
116.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.8
10.0
10.2
9.7
9.5
8.6
9.2
9.2
9.2
8.9
9.3
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.4
1.0
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft?)
7.5
7.2
7.5
6.7
6.9
5.7
6.0
6.4
5.4
5.1
6.5
7.0
6.9
6.9
6.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 12.8
14.0
13.9
14.0
12.9
13.1
14.1
13.2
15.6
15.4
13.2
11.5
11.7
11.8
12.0
Entrenchment Ratio'
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>23.2
>21.7
>21.7
>21.7
>22.5
>21.6
>22.2
>22.2
>22.2
>22.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4 MYS MY6
MY7
based on fixed bankfull elevation
116.5
116.5
116.5
116.5
116.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.6
11.1
10.7
11.1
11.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.9
0.8
0.9
0.8
0.8
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.4
1.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe)
9.2
9.2
9.2
8.9
8.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 12.3
13.4
12.5
13.8
15.4
Entrenchment Ratio'
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height RatOl
1.0 1
1.0 1
1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0
1Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width,
2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel

Table 12a. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Devil's Racetrack (West)
*Baseline, MYS, and MY2 data was updated during MY3 to include only shallow data.
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
4.7
9.6
4.8
10.0
4.8
10.0
4.2
10.0
4.2
9.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.4
0.9
0.7
0.8
0.6
1.2
0.6
0.8
0.5
1.0
Bankfull Max Depth
0.7
1.4
1.0
1.5
1.0
1.7
1.1
1.4
1.0
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
2.1
8.5
3.3
8.1
4.9
8.2
3.3
7.4
4.3
7.1
Width/Depth Ratio
10.6
14.8
6.9
12.6
4.0
13.4
4.7
14.0
4.0
14.7
Entrenchment Ratio
>20.9
>42.5
>20
>42.1
>20.1
>41.9
>20.0
>47.4
>21.5
>47.4
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max Depth (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wave Length (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
%of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%
0%
0%
*Baseline, MYS, and MY2 data was updated during MY3 to include only shallow data.

Table 12b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Devil's Racetrack (East)
*Baseline, MYS, and MY2 data was updated during MY3 to include only shallow data.
Min I
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
I Max
Min
Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.2
13.7
7.9
14.3
7.9
14.2
8.3
12.7
8.2
14.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.7
1.1
0.7
1.0
0.8
1.0
0.7
1.0
0.7
1.0
Bankfull Max Depth
1.1
1.7
1.1
1.8
1.2
1.7
1.2
2.1
1.2
2.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ftp)
5.7
14.1
5.9
12.5
6.1
12.7
6.3
13.2
6.3
13.4
Width/Depth Ratio
11.9
14.6
10.6
18.4
10.3
17.1
10.9
18.6
10.6
20.4
Entrenchment Ratio
>21.9
>36.5
>20.9
>37.8
>21.1
>37.8
>23.7
>36.3
>21.5
>36.6
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max Depth (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wave Length (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
%of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%
0%
0%
*Baseline, MYS, and MY2 data was updated during MY3 to include only shallow data.

Table 12c. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Southeast Branch
*Baseline, MYS, and MY2 data was updated during MY3 to include only shallow data.
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.0
5.3
2.9
5.1
2.6
3.9
2.7
3.5
2.4
3.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
>30
>200
>30
>200
>30
>200
>30
>200
>30
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth
0.5
0.6
1 0.5
0.8
1 0.5
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.4
0.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
0.8
2.1
1.1
2.0
0.8
1.3
0.9
1.0
0.7
0.9
Width/Depth Ratio
10.8
13.8
7.7
14.6
8.3
13.0
8.2
12.5
7.9
13.7
Entrenchment Ratio
>9.9
>37.5
>10.4
>38.9
>11.4
>51.3
>10.9
>57.9
>12.5
>56.4
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max Depth (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wave Length (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
%of Reach with Eroding Banks
10%
0%
0%
0%
*Baseline, MYS, and MY2 data was updated during MY3 to include only shallow data.

Table 12d. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Middle Branch
*Baseline, MYS, and MY2 data was updated during MY3 to include only shallow data.
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
2.2
3.4
2.3
3.2
2.2
3.1
1.3
3.5
1.2
2.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
>200
>50
>200
>50
>200
>50
>200
>50
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth
0.5
0.5 1
0.6
0.6
1 0.6
0.6
0.4
0.7
0.5
0.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
0.7
1.1
0.8
1.0
0.7
1.0
0.4
1.3
0.4
0.9
Width/Depth Ratio
6.7
10.1
6.8
10.7
6.8
10.2
4.0
9.5
3.5
8.7
Entrenchment Ratio
>22.9
>58.8
>21.5
>62.5
>23.2
>64.3
>38.4
>57.5
>42.9
>69.8
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max Depth (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wave Length (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
%of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%
0%
0%
*Baseline, MYS, and MY2 data was updated during MY3 to include only shallow data.

Table 12e. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Southwest Branch
*Baseline, MYS, and MY2 data was updated during MY3 to include only shallow data.
Min I Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min I Max
Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
2.4
2.9
3.0
2.5
1.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
Bankfull Max Depth
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
0.6
0.8
0.9
0.7
0.3
Width/Depth Ratio
9.7
11.2
10.1
8.9
12.0
Entrenchment Ratio
>82.3
>68.6
>67.5
>79.4
>108.7
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
9W
9r
mr
mr
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max Depth (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wave Length (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
%of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%
0%
0%
*Baseline, MYS, and MY2 data was updated during MY3 to include only shallow data.

Table 12f. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
North Branch
*Baseline, MYS, and MY2 data was updated during MY3 to include only shallow data.
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.6
9.3
9.0
9.2
9.0
9.2
9.0
9.2
8.9
9.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.8
0.6
0.8
0.6
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth
1.0
1.2
1 1.2
1.4
1 1.2
1.4
1.1
1.4
1.1
1.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
5.7
6.5
6.0
7.0
6.4
6.9
5.4
6.9
5.1
6.7
Width/Depth Ratio
13.1
13.2
11.5
14.1
11.7
13.2
11.8
15.6
12.0
15.4
Entrenchment Ratio
>21.6
>23.2
>21.7
>22.2
>21.7
>22.2
>21.7
>22.2
>22.2
>22.5
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max Depth (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wave Length (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
%of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%
0%
0%
*Baseline, MYS, and MY2 data was updated during MY3 to include only shallow data.

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 1 -DRC West110,
9+38 Shallow
140
138
136
c
O
134
Noe—
v
w
)
tMYO(2/2014)
tMYl(7/2014)
tMY2(4/2015)
+MY3(4/2016) tMY4(5/2017) —Bankfull—FloodproneArea
132
130
0 10
20
30
40 50
Width (ft
Bankfull Dimensions
5.3 x -section area (ft.sq.)
7.8 width (ft)
0.7 mean depth (ft)
1.4 max depth (ft)
8.2 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.6 hyd radi (ft)
11.5 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
25.7 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
)
tMYO(2/2014)
tMYl(7/2014)
tMY2(4/2015)
+MY3(4/2016) tMY4(5/2017) —Bankfull—FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 2 -DRC West
9+70 Pool
140
138
c
136
a
w
132
134
130
0 10 20 30 40 50
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014) +MYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
STV
8.1 x -section area (ft.sq.)
9.2 width (ft)
f '
0.9 mean depth (ft)
2.0 max depth (ft)
10.9 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.7 hyd radi (ft)
10.6 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
c
a
w
132
130
0 10 20 30 40 50
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014) +MYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) —Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 3 -DRC West
18+48 Shallow
136
c
0
'@
134
w
132
128
130
126
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
+MYO(2/2014) tMYl(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) tMY3(4/2016) �MY4(5/2017) -Bankfull FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
7.1 x -section area (ft.sq.)
9.3 width (ft)
0.8 mean depth (ft)
1.4 max depth (ft)
9.7 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.7 hyd radi (ft)
12.1 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
21.5 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
5
Survey Date: 5/2017
N•
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
+ev.
View Downstream
c
0
'@
a
w
128
126
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
+MYO(2/2014) tMYl(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) tMY3(4/2016) �MY4(5/2017) -Bankfull FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 4 -DRC West
18+80 Pool
136
134
—
c
132
0
'@
a
130
w
128
126
Bankfull Dimensions
20 30 40 50
60 70 80
8.0 x -section area (ft.sq.)
11.2 width (ft)
0.7 mean depth (ft)
tMYO (2/2014)
+MYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016)
tMY4 (5/2017) —Bankfull
1.6 max depth (ft)
11.9 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.7 hyd radi (ft)
15.6 width -depth ratio
M
Survey Date: 5/2017 .
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
—
c
132
0
'@
a
130
w
128
126
0 10
20 30 40 50
60 70 80
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014)
+MYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016)
tMY4 (5/2017) —Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 5 -DRC West
28+73 Pool
130
128
126
c
0
'@
a
124
w
122
120
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014) +MYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) �MY4 (5/2017) -Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
6.5 x -section area (ft.sq.)
9.3 width (ft)
0.7 mean depth (ft)
1.4 max depth (ft)
9.7 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.7 hyd radi (ft)
13.4 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
y
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
c
0
'@
a
w
122
120
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014) +MYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) �MY4 (5/2017) -Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 6 -DRC West
29+11 Shallow
130
128
c
0
'@ 124
a
126
w
122
120
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Width (ft)
+MYO(2/2014) tMYl(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) tMY3(4/2016) �MY4(5/2017) -Bankfull FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
'#{,
4.3 x -section area (ft.sq.)
8.0 width (ft)
0.5 mean depth (ft)
1.0 max depth (ft)
8.3 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.5 hyd radi (ft)
14.7 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
25.1 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
c
0
'@ 124
a
w
122
120
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Width (ft)
+MYO(2/2014) tMYl(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) tMY3(4/2016) �MY4(5/2017) -Bankfull FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 7 -DRC West
37+04 Pool
125
123
121
c
119
w
117
115
0 10 20 30
40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014) 4 MYI (7/2014)
+MY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) MY4 (5/2017) -Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
7.0 x -section area (ft.sq.)
8.7 width (ft)
0.8 mean depth (ft)
1.8 max depth (ft)
9.5 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.7 hyd radi (ft)
10.8 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 8 -DRC West
37+46 Shallow
124
122
a
120
w
116
114
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
118
Bankfull Dimensions
4.4 x -section area (ft.sq.)
4.2 width (ft)
1.0 mean depth (ft)
1.7 max depth (ft)
5.8 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.8 hyd radi (ft)
4.0 width -depth ratio
PIP
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
47.4 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
r
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
c
a
w
116
114
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
+MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) tMY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) �MY4 (5/2017) -Bankfull Floodprone Area

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 9 -DRC West
45+77 Shallow
lzo
118
,
c
116
w
114
112
110
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Width (ft)
+MYO(2/2014) tMYl(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) tMY3(4/2016) �MY4(5/2017) -Bankfull FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
4.6 x -section area (ft.sq.)
7.5 width (ft)
0.6 mean depth (ft)
1.0 max depth (ft)
7.7 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.6 hyd radi (ft)
12.4 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
26.7 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
km
View Downstream
,
c
w
112
110
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Width (ft)
+MYO(2/2014) tMYl(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) tMY3(4/2016) �MY4(5/2017) -Bankfull FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 10 -DRC West
46+14 Pool
lzo
118
,
116
c
114
w
112
110
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014) +MYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) -Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
4.0 x -section area (ft.sq.)
6.0 width (ft)
0.7 mean depth (ft)
0.9 max depth (ft)
6.5 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.6 hyd radi (ft)
9.0 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
..
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
J
View Downstream
,
c
w
112
110
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014) +MYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) -Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 11 -DRC EastV.
57+24 Pool
lzo
118
116
114
Bankfull Dimensions
15.9 x -section area (ft.sq.)
15.1 width (ft)
1.1 mean depth (ft)
2.0 max depth (ft)
15.7 wetted parimeter (ft)
1.0 hyd radi (ft)
14.3 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
c
a
w
112
110
0 10
20
30 40 50
60 70
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014) +MYl (7/2014)
+MY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) -Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 12 -DRC East
57+74 Shallow
lzo
c
a
w
112
118
110
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
+MYO(2/2014) tMYl(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) tMY3(4/2016) �MY4(5/2017) -Bankfull FloodproneArea
116
114
Bankfull Dimensions
8.4 x -section area (ft.sq.)
12.2 width (ft)
0.7 mean depth (ft)
1.3 max depth (ft)
12.6 wetted parimeter (ft)
t•
.'• ..�,
0.7 hyd radi (ft)
17.6 width -depth ratio
300.0 W flood prone area (ft)
24.6 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
c
a
w
112
110
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
+MYO(2/2014) tMYl(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) tMY3(4/2016) �MY4(5/2017) -Bankfull FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 13 -DRC East
66+64 Pool
lzo
118
116
114
Bankfull Dimensions
23.2 x -section area (ft.sq.)
21.8 width (ft)
1.1 mean depth (ft)
2.5 max depth (ft)
22.8 wetted parimeter (ft)
1.0 hyd radi (ft) '
20.5 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
c
0
'@
a
w
ry
112
110
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014) +MYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) -Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Section 14 -DRC East
67+02 Shallow
10.6
120
12.0
width (ft)
0.9
mean depth (ft)
1.6
max depth (ft)
12.5
wetted parimeter (ft)
118
hyd radi (ft)
13.7
width -depth ratio
300.0
W flood prone area (ft)
24.9
entrenchment ratio
1.0
low bank height ratio
116
c
114
a
w
112
110
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
+MYO (2/2014) 4 MYl (7/2014) tMY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) --s—MY4 (5/2017) —Bankfull Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
10.6
x -section area (ft.sq.)
12.0
width (ft)
0.9
mean depth (ft)
1.6
max depth (ft)
12.5
wetted parimeter (ft)
0.8
hyd radi (ft)
13.7
width -depth ratio
300.0
W flood prone area (ft)
24.9
entrenchment ratio
1.0
low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
r
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 15 -DRC Eastmanor-
77+04 Pool
lzo
118
116
Bankfull Dimensions
13.3 x -section area (ft.sq.)
12.3 width (ft)
1.1 mean depth (ft)
1.8 max depth (ft)
12.9 wetted parimeter (ft):
1.0 hyd radi (ft) - �•;'
11.4 width -depth ratio .
y a
Survey Date: 5/2017;.
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
f
View Downstream
c
0
'@
114
a
w
112
110
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014) +MYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) -Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Section 16 -DRC East
29+11 Shallow
11.3
120
12.4
width (ft)
0.9
118
1.7
max depth (ft)
12.9
wetted parimeter (ft)
116
hyd radi (ft)
13.5
width -depth ratio
c
0
W flood prone area (ft)
24.3
entrenchment ratio
1.0
114
a
w
112
110
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
+MYO (2/2014) 4 MYl (7/2014) tMY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) --4—MY4 (5/2017) —Bankfull Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
11.3
x -section area (ft.sq.)
12.4
width (ft)
0.9
mean depth (ft)
1.7
max depth (ft)
12.9
wetted parimeter (ft)
0.9
hyd radi (ft)
13.5
width -depth ratio
300.0
W flood prone area (ft)
24.3
entrenchment ratio
1.0
low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 17 -DRC East
86+95 Shallow
118
c
'�
116
112
a
w
114
110
108
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
+MYO(2/2014) tMYl(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) tMY3(4/2016) �MY4(5/2017) -Bankfull FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
13.4 x -section area (ft.sq.)
13.6 width (ft)
1.0 mean depth (ft)
2.1 max depth (ft)
14.3 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.9 hyd radi (ft)
13.8 width -depth ratio
r
300.0 W flood prone area (ft)
- -
22.1 entrenchment ratio
_
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
c
'�
112
a
w
110
108
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
+MYO(2/2014) tMYl(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) tMY3(4/2016) �MY4(5/2017) -Bankfull FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Section 18 -DRC East
91+00 Pool
x -section area (ft.sq.)
118
width (ft)
1.1
mean depth (ft)
2.0
max depth (ft)
16.1
wetted parimeter (ft)
1.0
116
14.1
—
114
POc
112
a
w
110
108
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014) +MYI (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
16.6
x -section area (ft.sq.)
15.3
width (ft)
1.1
mean depth (ft)
2.0
max depth (ft)
16.1
wetted parimeter (ft)
1.0
hyd radi (ft)
14.1
width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 19 -DRC East
91+48 Shallow
118
116
114
_
c
112
a
w
110
108
0 10
20
30 40
50 60 70
80 90 100
Bankfull Dimensions
Width (ft)
9.6 x -section area (ft.sq.)
+MYO (2/2014)
tMYl (7/2014)
tMY2 (4/2015)
tMY3 (4/2016) �MY4 (5/2017)
14.0 width (ft)
0.7 mean depth (ft)
1.4 max depth (ft)
14.4 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.7 hyd radi (ft)
-
20.4 width -depth ratio
300.0 W flood prone area (ft)
21.5 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio"
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
114
_
c
112
a
w
110
108
0 10
20
30 40
50 60 70
80 90 100
Width (ft)
+MYO (2/2014)
tMYl (7/2014)
tMY2 (4/2015)
tMY3 (4/2016) �MY4 (5/2017)
-Bankfull Floodprone Area

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 20 -DRC East
102+92 Shallow
115
113
111
c
0
'@
109
a
w
107
105
0
10
20
30
40 50 60
Width (ft)
Bankfull Dimensions
+MYO(2/2014)
tMYl(7/2014)
6.3 x -section area (ft.sq.)
tMY3(4/2016)
�MY4(5/2017) -Bankfull FloodproneArea
8.2 width (ft)
0.8 mean depth (ft)
1.2 max depth (ft)
8.7 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.7 hyd radi (ft)
10.6 width -depth ratio
300.0 W flood prone area (ft)
36.6 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
-
View Downstream
111
c
0
'@
a
w
107
105
0
10
20
30
40 50 60
Width (ft)
+MYO(2/2014)
tMYl(7/2014)
tMY2(4/2015)
tMY3(4/2016)
�MY4(5/2017) -Bankfull FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 21 -DRC East
103+37 Pool
114
112
110
108
Bankfull Dimensions
10.6 x -section area (ft.sq.)
7.8 width (ft)
1.4 mean depth (ft)
2.0 max depth (ft)
9.7 wetted parimeter (ft)
1.1 hyd radi (ft)
5.7 width -depth ratio +
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
c
0
'@
a
w
106
104
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014) +MYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) -Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 22 -Southwest Branch
509+04 Pool
140
138
136
0
w
134
132
0 10 20 30 40 50
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014) +MYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) -Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
1.3 x -section area (ft.sq.)
4.2 width (ft)
0.3 mean depth (ft)
0.6 max depth (ft)
4.4 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
13.2 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
`
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
W
View Downstream
0
w
132
0 10 20 30 40 50
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014) +MYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) -Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 23 -Southwest BranchLUQ
509+15 Shallow
140
c
0
138
iiiiiiFqQ;�:=
w
134
0 10 20 30 40 50
Width (ft)
+MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) tMY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) �MY4 (5/2017) -Bankfull Floodprone Area
136
Bankfull Dimensions
0.3 x -section area (ft.sq.)
1.8 width (ft)
0.2 mean depth (ft)
0.3 max depth (ft)
1.9 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.1 hyd radi (ft)
12.0 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
108.7 entrenchment ratio
�t }
1.0 low bank height ratio'"r
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
K, .L
I&- - _ -
View Downstream
c
0
w
134
0 10 20 30 40 50
Width (ft)
+MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) tMY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) �MY4 (5/2017) -Bankfull Floodprone Area

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 24 -Middle Branch
207+00 Shallow
140
138
w
0
136
132
0 10 20 30 40 50
Width (ft)
+MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) tMY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) �MY4 (5/2017) -Bankfull Floodprone Area
134
Bankfull Dimensions
-
0.4 x -section area (ft.sq.)
1.2 width (ft)
0.3 mean depth (ft)
0.5 max depth (ft)
1.5 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
3.5 width -depth ratio
50.0 W flood prone area (ft)
42.9 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
w
132
0 10 20 30 40 50
Width (ft)
+MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) tMY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) �MY4 (5/2017) -Bankfull Floodprone Area

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 25 -Middle Branch
207+08 Pool
140
138
136
0
w
134
132
0 10 20 30 40 50
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014) +MYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) -Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
1.2 x -section area (ft.sq.)
2.7 width (ft)
0.5 mean depth (ft)
0.8 max depth (ft)
3.4 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.4 hyd radi (ft)
5.8 width -depth ratio
Lv
Survey Date: 5/2017
i
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
w
132
0 10 20 30 40 50
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014) +MYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) -Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 26 -Middle Branch
216+22 Pool
128
126
124
Bankfull Dimensions -z.'.— %� ,� "17 .. rr
1.0 x -section area (ft.sq.)
4.4 width (ft) _
0.2 mean depth (ft)
0.5 max depth (ft)
4.7 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.2 hyd radi (ft) S
19.7 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
- F
View Downstream
c
0
y
w
122
0 10 20 30 40
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014) +MYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) �MY4 (5/2017) -Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 27 -Middle Branch
216+34 Shallow
128
126
c
0
y
w
124
122
0 10 20 30 40
Width (ft)
+MYO(2/2014) tMYl(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) tMY3(4/2016) �MY4(5/2017) -Bankfull FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
0.9 x -section area (ft.sq.)
2.9 width (ft)
0.3 mean depth (ft)
0.6 max depth (ft)
3.2 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
8.7 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
69.8 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
c
0
y
w
122
0 10 20 30 40
Width (ft)
+MYO(2/2014) tMYl(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) tMY3(4/2016) �MY4(5/2017) -Bankfull FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 28 -Southeast Branch
310+03 Pool
142
140
0
138
a
w
136
134
IT
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014) +MYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) —Bankfull
I
I
Bankfull Dimensions
1.5 x -section area (ft.sq.)
3.3 width (ft)
0.4 mean depth (ft)
1.1 max depth (ft)
4.5 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
7.3 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
•y, . ;.
-...,-
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
a
136
134
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014) +MYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) —Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 29 -Southeast Branch
310+15 Shallow
142
140
0
138
a
w
136
134
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
+MYO(2/2014) tMYl(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) tMY3(4/2016) �MY4(5/2017) —Bankfull FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
0.7 x -section area (ft.sq.)
2.4 width (ft)
0.3 mean depth (ft)
0.7 max depth (ft)
2.9 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
7.9 width -depth ratio
30.0 W flood prone area (ft)
12.5 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
:3
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
0
a
w
134
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
+MYO(2/2014) tMYl(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) tMY3(4/2016) �MY4(5/2017) —Bankfull FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 30 -Southeast Branch
318+11 Pool
126
124
wu122
Bankfull Dimensions
0.7 x -section area (ft.sq.)
3.0 width (ft)
0.2 mean depth (ft)
0.4 max depth (ft)
3.2 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.2 hyd radi (ft)
12.7 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
c
0
',
120
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014) +MYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) -Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 31 -Southeast Branch
318+27 Shallow
126
124
0
122
w
C
I
La
120
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
+MYO(2/2014) tMYl(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) tMY3(4/2016) �MY4(5/2017) -Bankfull FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
0.7 x -section area (ft.sq.)
2.4 width (ft)
0.3 mean depth (ft)
0.5 max depth (ft)
2.7 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
7.9 width -depth ratio
60.0 W flood prone area (ft)
24.9 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
f
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
0
122
w
120
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
+MYO(2/2014) tMYl(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) tMY3(4/2016) �MY4(5/2017) -Bankfull FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 32 -Southeast Branch
325+58 Shallow
120
118
c
0
y
w
116
114
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
+MYO(2/2014) tMYl(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) tMY3(4/2016) �MY4(5/2017) -Bankfull FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
0.9 x -section area (ft.sq.)
3.5 width (ft)
0.3 mean depth (ft)
0.4 max depth (ft)
3.7 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
13.7 width -depth ratio
i
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
56.4 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
c
0
y
w
114
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
+MYO(2/2014) tMYl(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) tMY3(4/2016) �MY4(5/2017) -Bankfull FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 33 -Southeast Branch
325+73 Pool
lzo
lls
116
114
Bankfull Dimensions
0.9 x -section area (ft.sq.)
3.7 width (ft)
0.3 mean depth (ft)
0.4 max depth (ft)
3.9 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.2 hyd radi (ft)
14.7 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
�
c
0
a
w
112
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014) +MYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) -Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 34 -North Branch
407+67 Pool
122
120
0
118
a
w
116
114
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014) +MYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) -Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
-
6.9 x -section area (ft.sq.)
9.5 width (ft)
0.7 mean depth (ft)
1.4 max depth (ft)
10.0 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.7 hyd radi (ft)
12.9 width -depth ratio
{
Survey Date: 5/2017
4
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
0
a
w
114
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014) +MYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) -Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 35 -North Branch
407+67 Shallow
122
120
0
y 118
w
116
0 10
20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
+MYO (2/2014) 4 MYl (7/2014) tMY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) --4—MY4 (5/2017) —Bankfull Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
5.1 x -section area (ft.sq.)
8.9 width (ft)
0.6 mean depth (ft)
1.1 max depth (ft)
9.3 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.6 hyd radi (ft)
15.4 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
22.5 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
/ `; _ • ;
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 36 -North Branch
416+47 Shallow
120
118
116
AA
c
0
'@ 114
a
w
112
110
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
+MYO(2/2014) tMYl(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) tMY3(4/2016) �MY4(5/2017) -Bankfull FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
6.7 x -section area (ft.sq.)
9.0 width (ft)
0.7 mean depth (ft)
1.3 max depth (ft)
9.4 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.7 hyd radi (ft)
12.0 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
22.2 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
c
0
'@ 114
a
w
112
110
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
+MYO(2/2014) tMYl(7/2014) tMY2(4/2015) tMY3(4/2016) �MY4(5/2017) -Bankfull FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 37 -North Branch
416+85 Pool
120
118q
116
c
0
ills000
a
w
114
112
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014) +MYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) -Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
8.9 x -section area (ft.sq.)
11.7 width (ft)
R.
0.8 mean depth (ft)
1.4 max depth (ft)
12.2 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.7 hyd radi (ft)
i
'
15.4 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
r
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
116
c
0
a
w
114
112
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014) +MYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) -Bankfull

APPENDIX 5. Hydrology Summary Data and Plots

Table 13. Verification of Bankfull Events
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Reach
Date of Data Date of
Collection Occurrence
Method
Devil's Racetrach (West)
4/19/2017 3/14/2017
1 Crest Gage/
Pressure
Transducer
5/17/2017 4/25/2017
7/10/2017 5/24/2017
7/10/2017 6/15/2017
Devil's Racetrach (East)
4/19/2017 3/14/2017
5/17/2017 4/25/2017
7/10/2017 5/24/2017
Southwest Branch
5/17/2017 4/25/2017
7/10/2017 5/24/2017
Middle Branch
5/17/2017 4/25/2017
7/10/2017 5/24/2017
Southeast Branch
4/19/2017 3/14/2017
5/17/2017 4/25/2017
North Branch
5/17/2017 4/25/2017
7/10/2017 5/24/2017

Table 14. Wetland Gage Attainment Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Summary of Groundwater Gage Results for Monitoring Years 1 through 7
Success Criteria Achieved/Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season (Percentage)
Gage
Year 1(2014)*
Year 2 (2015)
Year 3 (2016)
Year 4 (2017)
Year 5 (2018)
Year 6 (2019) Year 7 (2020)
No/7.5 Days
No/16 Days
Yes/31 Days
Yes/28 Days
1
(3.1%)
(6.0%)
(11.9%)
(10.8%)
No/14.5 Days
Yes/ 58 Days
No/21 Days
No/15 Days
2
(6.0%)
(22.3%)
(8.1%)
(5.8%)
No/2.5 Days
Yes/33 Days
No/9 Days
No/11 Days
3
(1.0%)
(12.8%)
(3.5%)
(4.2%)
No/13.5 Days
Yes/57 Days
Yes/25 Days
Yes/30 Days
4
(5.6%)
(21.9%)
(9.6%)
(11.5%)
No/12.5 Days
Yes/34 Days
No/18 Days
No/12 Days
5
(5.2%)
(13.0%)
(6.9%)
(4.6%)
No/11.0 Days
Yes/53 Days
Yes/23 Days
No/13 Days
6
(4.6%)
(20.3%)
(8.8%)
(5.0%)
Yes/21.5 Days
Yes/66 Days
Yes/25 Days
Yes/23 Days
7
(9.0%)
(25.6%)
(9.6%)
(8.8%)
No/5.0 Days
Yes/31 Days
No/8 Days
No/10 Days
8
(2.1%)
(12.0%)
(3.1%)
(3.8%)
Yes/ 22.0 Days
Yes/80 Days
Yes/ 39.0 Days
Yes/28 Days
9
(9.2%)
(31.0%)
(15.0%)
(10.8%)
No/ 1.5 Days
No/10 Days
No/ 3 Days
No/3 Days
10
(0.6%)
(3.9%)
(1.2%)
(1.2%)
No/9.0 Days
Yes/65 Days
Yes/23 Days
Yes/31 Days
11
(3.8%)
(25.2%)
(8.8%)
(11.9%)
No/7.5 Days
Yes/31 Days
No/13 Days
Yes/30 Days
12
(3.1%)
(12.0%)
(5.0%)
(11.5%)
No/8.0 Days
Yes/34 Days
No/11 Days
No/10 Days
13
(3.3%)
(13.0%)
(4.2%)
(3.8%)
No/ 8.5 Days
Yes/32 Days
No/12 Days
No/12 Days
14
(3.5%)
(12.4%)
(4.6%)
(4.6%)
No/12.5 Days
Yes/33 Days
No/14 Days
Yes/30 Days
15
(5.2%)
(12.8%)
(5.4%)
(11.5%)
No/12.5 Days
Yes/33 Days
Yes/39 Days
Yes/29 Days
16
(5.2%)
(12.8%)
(15%)
(11.2%)
No/15.0 Days
Yes/34 Days
Yes/23 Days
No/16 Days
17
(6.3%)
(13.2%)
(8.8%)
(6.2%)
Yes/69.5 Days
Yes/66 Days
Yes/22 Days
No/14 Days
18
(29.0%)
(25.6%)
(8.5%)
(5.4%)
Yes/31.5 Days
Yes/66 Days
Yes/26 Days
Yes/30 Days
19
(13.1%)
(25.6%)
(10.0%)
(11.5%)
No/19.5 Days
Yes/35 Days
No/12 Days
No/5 Days
20
(8.1%)
(13.4%)
(4.6%)
(1.9%)
Yes/69.5 Days
Yes/79 Days
Yes/38 Days
Yes/31 Days
21
(29.0%)
(30.4%)
(14.6%)
(11.9%)
Yes/ 31.0 Days
Yes/66 Days
Yes/24 Days
No/16 Days
22
(12.9%)
(25.6%)
(9.2%)
(6.2%)
No/8.0 Days
Yes/31 Days
No/6 Days
No/5 Days
23
(3.3%)
(11.8%)
(2.3%)
(1.9%)
No/13.0 Days
Yes/33 Days
No/ 5 Days
No/9 Days
24
(5.4%)
(12.8%)
(1.9%)
(3.5%)
Yes/25.5 Days
Yes/66 Days
Yes/23 Days
No/16 Days
25
(10.6%)
(25.6%)
(8.8%)
(6.2%)
Yes/39.0 Days
Yes/83 Days
Yes/25 Days
No/14 Days
26
(16.3%)
(32.2%)
(9.6%)
(5.4%)
Yes/29.5 Days
Yes/67 Days
Yes/31 Days
Yes/32 Days
27
(12.3%)
(26.0%)
(11.9%)
(12.3%)
No/19.5 Days
Yes/81 Days
Yes/106 Days
Yes/102 Days
28
(8.1%)
(31.2%)
(40.8%)
(39.2%)
Yes/70.0 Days
Yes/81 Days
Yes/56 Days
Yes/78 Days
29
(29.2%)
(31.4%)
(21.5%)
(30.0%)
Yes/52.5 Days
Yes/83 Days
No/11 Days
No/9 Days
30
(21.9%)
(32.0%)
(4.2%)
(3.5%)
No/9.0 Days
Yes/77 Days
Yes/40 Days
Yes/32 Days
31
(3.8%)
(29.7%)
(15.4%)
(12.3%)
No/ 7.0 Days
Yes/78 Days
No/11 Days
No/3 Days
32
(2.9%)
(30.2%)
(4.2%)
(1.2%)
Yes/69.5 Days
Yes/84 Days
Yes/51 Days
Yes/46 Days
33
(29.0%)
(32.4%)
(19.6%)
(17.7%)
No/2.0 Days
No/16 Days
No/10 Days
No/4 Days
34
(0.8%)
(6.0%)
(3.8%)
(1.5%)
Added During
Yes/33 Days
Yes/42 Days
Yes/31 Days
35
MY2
(12.8%)
(16.2%)
(11.9%)
Added During
Yes/34 Days
Yes/40 Days
Yes/31 Days
36
MY2
(13.0%)
(15.4%)
(11.9%)
Added During
Yes/33 Days
Yes/22 Days
No/15 Days
37
MY2
(12.8%)
(8.5%)
(5.8%)
Added During
Yes/33 Days
No/6 Days
No/11 Days
38
MY2
(12.8%)
(2.3%)
(4.2%)
* NRCS WETS data was used to determine the growing season for monitorg year 1. After discussions with the US Army Corps
of Engineers, on-site soil temperature probe data is being used to determine the beginning of the growing season.

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
-0 ? C OD Q a+ > U
�i 2 Q Q n O Z D
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #1 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
i ? C OD Q a+ > U
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #2 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
i ? C OD Q a+ > U
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #3 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
-0 ? C by Q a+ > U
�i Q Q n O Z D
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #4 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
OJ
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
0
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #5
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
V)
Cp �
C
.3 0
o �
m
w
0
®--mss "� �c� ' _mac ar. � Qx� ��wc� — o o -� �' - Q x � ®c' �� •, � • � � ��� -m
II I V I I
--J -11111
c on Q
Q Q n 0
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #5 — — Criteria Level
0
N
N
ao 0 6.0
� N
o
o 5.0
W
4.0
C
3.0 1i
S
2.0
1.0
0.0
o v
z o

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
-0 ? C OD Q a+ > U
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #6 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
-0 ? C OD Q a+ > U
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #7 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
i ? C OD Q a+ > U
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #8 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #9
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
®F�
-40 - —
III�
-50 1 . ,
-60 „� I. . , . I _ Ilii , I ,. .�. �I I_ d,,_ ... l.1 11 .J .I.
a a V) 0
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #9 — — Criteria Level
0
v
0
� N
o
G
0
W
6.0
5.0
4.0
C
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0
z o
0
N
v
Ln
20
—
c
3 0
o �
10
(D m
w
0
Y
0
vi
-10
v
-20
L
3 -30
Well re -installed after
maintenance on
1/20/2017
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #9
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
®F�
-40 - —
III�
-50 1 . ,
-60 „� I. . , . I _ Ilii , I ,. .�. �I I_ d,,_ ... l.1 11 .J .I.
a a V) 0
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #9 — — Criteria Level
0
v
0
� N
o
G
0
W
6.0
5.0
4.0
C
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0
z o

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
0
N
S-10
OJ
-20
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #10
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
-40
-50 I I I
60 III_ V JI
2 a a 0
� Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #10 — — Criteria Level
0
v
WO
� N
o
G
0
W
6.0
5.0
4.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
z o
C
v
Ln
20
c
3 0
o �
10
m
w
0
Y
0 h
vi
S-10
OJ
-20
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #10
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
-40
-50 I I I
60 III_ V JI
2 a a 0
� Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #10 — — Criteria Level
0
v
WO
� N
o
G
0
W
6.0
5.0
4.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
z o
C

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
m
-0 >� c 5 on D-
oi 2 Q Q n 0
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #11 — — Criteria Level
ao 0
6.0
N
o
o
5.0
C:
LU
4.0
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0
o
v
z
o

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
m
-0 >� c 5 on D-
oi Q Q n 0
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #12 — — Criteria Level
ao 0
6.0
� N
o
o
5.0
c
LU
4.0
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0
o
v
z
o

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
Q i bD Q Y
Q to O
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #13 — — Criteria Level
ao 0
6.0
N
o
o
5.0
C:
LU
4.0
3.0
S
m
cc
2.0
1.0
0.0
O
N
Z
0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
c on Q
Q n 0
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #14 — — Criteria Level
ao 0
6.0
N
o
o
5.0
C:
LU
4.0
3.0
S
m
cc
2.0
1.0
0.0
o
v
z
o

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
c on Q
Q n 0
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #15 — — Criteria Level
ao 0
6.0
N
o
o
5.0
C:
LU
4.0
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0
o
v
z
o

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
c on Q
Q n 0
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #16 — — Criteria Level
ao 0
6.0
N
o
o
5.0
c
LU
4.0
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0
o
v
z
o

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
c on Q
Q n 0
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #17 — — Criteria Level
ao 0
6.0
N
o
o
5.0
C:
LU
4.0
3.0
S
m
cc
2.0
1.0
0.0
o
v
z
o

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
m
-0 >� c 5 on D-
oi Q Q n 0
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #18 — — Criteria Level
ao 0
6.0
N
o
o
5.0
C:
LU
4.0
3.0
S
m
cc
2.0
1.0
0.0
o
v
z
o

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
m
-0 >� c 5 on D-
oi Q Q n 0
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #19 — — Criteria Level
ao 0
6.0
� N
o
o
5.0
C:
LU
4.0
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0
o
v
z
o

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
c on Q
Q Vn 0
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #20 — — Criteria Level
ao 0
6.0
� N
o
o
5.0
C:
LU
4.0
3.0
S
m
cc
2.0
1.0
0.0
o
v
z
o

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
c on Q
Q Vn 0
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #21 — — Criteria Level
ao 0
6.0
N
o
o
5.0
C:
LU
4.0
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0
o
v
z
o

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
Q Vn 0
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #22 — — Criteria Level
ao 0
6.0
� N
o
o
5.0
C:
LU
4.0
3.0
S
m
cc
2.0
1.0
0.0
o
v
z
o

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
c on Q
Q Vn 0
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #23 — — Criteria Level
ao 0
6.0
� N
o
o
5.0
C:
LU
4.0
3.0
S
m
cc
2.0
1.0
0.0
o
v
z
o

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
OJ
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #24
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
c on Q
Q Q Vn 0
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #24 — — Criteria Level
0
v
o
� N
o
G
0
W
6.0
5.0
4.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
o v
z o
C

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
m
-0 >� c 5 on D-
oi Q Q Vn 0
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #25 — — Criteria Level
ao 0
6.0
� N
o
o
5.0
C:
LU
4.0
3.0
S
m
cc
2.0
1.0
0.0
o
v
z
o

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
m
-0 >� c 5 on D-
oi Q Q Vn 0
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #26 — — Criteria Level
ao 0
6.0
� N
o
o
5.0
C:
LU
4.0
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0
o
v
z
o

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
c on Q
Q Vn 0
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #27 — — Criteria Level
ao 0
6.0
� N
o
o
5.0
c
LU
4.0
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0
o
v
z
o

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
m
-0 >� c 5 on D-
oi Q Q Vn 0
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #28 — — Criteria Level
0
6.0
� N
O
o
5.0
c
LU
4.0
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0
o
v
z
0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
a
1
Q to O
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #29 — — Criteria Level
ao 0
6.0
� N
o
o
5.0
C:
LU
4.0
3.0
S
m
cc
2.0
1.0
0.0
O
v
Z

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
Q to O Z D
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #30 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
C
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
m
-0 >� c 5 on D-
oi Q Q n 0
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #31 — — Criteria Level
ao 0
6.0
N
o
o
5.0
C:
LU
4.0
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0
o
v
z
o

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
00 Q > V
Q to O Z D
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #32 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
m
-0 >� c 5 ao Q
Q n 0
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #33 — — Criteria Level
ao 0
6.0
� N
o
o
5.0
C:
LU
4.0
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0
o
v
z
o

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
m
-0 >� c 5 on Q
°�' 2 Q Q n 0
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #34 — — Criteria Level
ao 0
6.0
� N
o
o
5.0
C:
LU
4.0
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0
o
v
z
o

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
m
-0 T c 5 ao Q
Q Un 0
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #35 — — Criteria Level
ao 0
6.0
� N
o
o
5.0
C:
LU
4.0
3.0
S
m
cc
2.0
1.0
0.0
o
v
z
o

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
m
-0 >� c 5 on D-
oi Q Q n 0
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #36 — — Criteria Level
ao 0
6.0
� N
o
o
5.0
C:
LU
4.0
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0
o
v
z
o

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
> V
Q to O Z D
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #37 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
20
10
0
-10
v
3 -20
L
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 ? C UO Q > V
�i 2 Q Q o O Z D
� Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #38 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0
c
2.0
1.0
0.0

Stream Flow Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
139
138
137
a
136
is
3
135
134
133
Devil's Racetrack: Stream Flow Gage for SW Branch
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
c - > c 75 on CL> u
S
LL Q ii O Z
vO
Rainfall SW Branch Water Depth Thalweg Elevation •Bankfull
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
c
2.0 w
c
to
Cc
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0

Stream Flow Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
139
138
137
a
136
a
m
3
135
134
133
Devil's Racetrack: Stream Flow Gage for Middle Branch
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
c - > c 75 on CL> u
LL
Q S ¢ ii O Z
vO
Rainfall Middle Branch Water Depth — — Thalweg Elevation • Bankfull
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
c
2.0 w
c
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0

Stream Flow Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
125
124
123
a
v
J
121
120
119
118
Devil's Racetrack: Stream Flow Gage for SE Branch
SG4- SE Branch
c - > c 75 on CL> u
SLL ¢ vii O Z O
Rainfall SE Branch Water Depth — — Thalweg Elevation • Bankfull
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
c
2.0 w
C
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0

Monthly Rainfall Data
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Devil's Racetrack 30-70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall in 2017 Smithfield, NC
10
9
8
7
c 6
c
0
m 5
..�
.Q
'u
01
a 4
3
2
1
0
Jan -17 Feb -17 Mar -17 Apr -17 May -17 Jun -17 Jul -17 Aug -17 Sep -17 Oct -17
Date
2017 Rainfall Data (weather station) 30th Percentile 70th Percentile
1 2017 monthly rainfall collected from USDA weather station 317994 (Smithfield, NC).
2 30th and 70th percentile rainfall data collected from weather station 317994, in Smithfield, NC (USDA, 1970 - 2000).

Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
30
20
10
0
c
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #1
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
-30
-40
-50
-60
UD Q > V
LL Q Q Ln O Z
Pre -Construction Rainfall Rainfall Pre -Construction Gage Depth Gage #1 — — Criteria Level
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
c
2.5 w
C
2.0 z
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0

Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
30
20
10
0
C
-40
-50
-60
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #6
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
c
O
C
O
of
v
bo tito
v
ti
O
rqo
C p
o
3
M
O
w
O
v
N
u
UJ
A
__________________
--------------------
IVA V Ilk
"y
I\M
to Q > V
LL Q Q Ln O Z
Pre -Construction Rainfall Rainfall Pre -Construction Gage Depth Gage #6 — — Criteria Level
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
c
2.5 w
C
2.0 z

Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
30
20
10
0
c
a, -10
J
-20
-30
-40
-50
-60
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #8
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
M Q > V
LL Q Q Ln O Z
Pre -Construction Rainfall Rainfall Pre -Construction Gage Depth Gage #8 — — Criteria Level
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
E
2.5
C
M
2.0 0�
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0

Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
30
20
10
0
c
a, -10
J
-20
-30
-40
-50
-60
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #12
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
UD Q > U
LL Q Q Ln O Z
Pre -Construction Rainfall Rainfall Pre -Construction Gage Depth Gage #12 — — Criteria Level
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
E
2.5
C
M
2.0 0�
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0

Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
30
20
10
0
c
a, -10
J
-20
-30
-40
-50
-60
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #19
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
M Q > V
LL Q Q Ln O Z
Pre -Construction Rainfall Rainfall Pre -Construction Gage Depth Gage #19 — — Criteria Level
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
E
2.5
C
M
2.0 0�
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0

Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
30
20
10
0
c
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #21
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
-30
-40
-50
-60
M Q > V
LL Q Q Ln O Z
Pre -Construction Rainfall Rainfall Pre -Construction Gage Depth Gage #21 — — Criteria Level
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
c
2.5 w
C
2.0 z
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0

Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
30
20
10
0
c
a, -10
J
-20
-30
-40
-50
-60
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #28
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
C -0 i >. C - W Q �"' > V
i � Q 2 Q to O Z p
Pre -Construction Rainfall Rainfall Pre -Construction Gage Depth Gage #28 — — Criteria Level
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
E
2.5
C
M
2.0 0�
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0

Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
30
20
10
0
c
a, -10
J
-20
-30
-40
-50
-60
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #36
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
M Q > V
LL Q Q Ln O Z
Pre -Construction Rainfall Rainfall Pre -Construction Gage Depth Gage #36 — — Criteria Level
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
E
2.5
C
M
2.0 0�
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0

Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
30
20
10
0
C
-30
-40
-50
-60
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #38
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
to 2 +"' > U
LL Q Q LnO Z
Pre -Construction Rainfall Rainfall Pre -Construction Gage Depth Gage #38 — — Criteria Level
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
c
2.5 w
C
2.0 z
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
o
v
N
on tito
C p
f6
�
aq
O
rq
o
3
o �
O
O
N
v
UJ
u
_________________________
_ _ ---------------------------
ft
IL I IM It i. -
to 2 +"' > U
LL Q Q LnO Z
Pre -Construction Rainfall Rainfall Pre -Construction Gage Depth Gage #38 — — Criteria Level
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
c
2.5 w
C
2.0 z
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0