20120102 Ver 1_Year 4 Monitoring Report 2017_20180103

MONITORING YEAR 4 of 5
ANNUAL REPORT
Final
BYRDS CREEK MITIGATION SITE
Person County, NC
NCDEQ Contract 003987
DMS Project Number 95020
USACE Action ID Number 2012-00230
NCDWR Project Number 2012-0102
Data Collection Period: January 2017 - October 2017
Draft Submission Date: November 22, 2017
Final Submission Date: January 3, 2018
PREPARED FOR:
INC Department of Environment Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652

WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
January 3, 2018
Jeff Schaffer
N.C. Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
RE: Monitoring Year 4 Report for Byrd's Creek Mitigation Site (95020)
Neuse River Basin — CU# 03020201
Person County, North Carolina
Contract No. 003987
Dear Mr. Schaffer,
We have reviewed the comments on the Monitoring Year 4 Report for the above referenced project
dated December 22, 2017 and have revised the report based on these comments. The revised
documents are submitted with this letter. Below are responses to each of your comments. For your
convenience, the comments are reprinted with our response in italics.
1) The digital data and drawings have been reviewed and determined to meet DMS requirements.
2) Add the USACE Action ID number (2012-00230) and NCDWR Project number (2012-0102) to the
cover page.
The USACE Action ID number and NCDWR Project number have been added to the cover page.
3) Asper our discussion during the December 20, 2017 site visit, DMS recommends that Wildlands
plant larger, more age appropriate trees in the encroachment area along Byrd's Creek Reach 4.
Also, please show this on the CCPV and discuss in the report narrative.
Wildlands will plant larger more age appropriate trees in the area of easement encroachment along
Byrd's Creek Reach 4. Also, this area is discussed in the report in section 1.2.2.
4) Section 1.2.3: In this section, you state that all the beaver dams were on Byrd's Creek Reach 4
According to the CCPV they are all on Byrd's Creek Reach 3.
Section 1.2.3 was updated to state all the beaver dams are on Byrd's Creek Reach 3.
5) Appendix 4: For any morphological tables, provide a footnote with the tables that describes the
method by which Wildlands is calculating Bank Height Ratio and Entrenchment Ratio. In addition,
please provide context to any observed changes in these calculated ratios in the report narrative.
DMS has proposed a method for these calculations that can be found in the As -Built Baseline
template guidance As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report —June 2017 Page22, specifically the
paragraphs 8 and 9.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (P) 919.851.9986 • 312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225 • Raleigh, NC 27609

ON
W
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
A footnote was added to morphological tables in Appendix 4 describing the method used to calculate
Bank Height Ratio, and Entrenchment Ratio.
If you have any questions, please contact me by phone [phone], or by email
([e-mail]).
Sincerely,
Jason Lorch, Monitoring Coordinator
{� , Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (P) 919.851.9986 • 312 West Mj illbrook Road, Suite 225 • Raleigh, NC 27609

PREPARED BY:
W
WILDLANDS
E N G 1 NEER I N G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Jason Lorch
[e-mail]
Phone: [phone]

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Wildlands Engineering (Wildlands) completed a full delivery project for the North Carolina Division of
Mitigation Services (DMS) to restore and enhance a total of 7,328 linear feet of stream in Person County,
North Carolina. The project streams consist of Byrds Creek, a third order stream, as well as three
unnamed first and second order tributaries to Byrds Creek (South Branch, Southeast Branch, and West
Branch). The project provides 5,371 stream mitigation units (SMU's). At the downstream limits of the
project, the drainage area is 2,957 acres (4.62 square miles).
The Byrds Creek Mitigation Site, hereafter referred to as the Site, is approximately 1.8 miles south of
Hurdle Mills, NC off of Wolfe Road in southwestern Person County (Figure 1). The Site is located in the
Carolina Slate Belt of the Piedmont Physiographic Province (USGS, 1998). The Site is within the South
Flat River watershed, North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) Subbasin 03-04-01 of the
Neuse River Basin and United States Geological Survey (USGS) Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC)
03020201010020. Land use within the watershed is rural and is dominated by forestry, agriculture, and
livestock operations; with approximately 60% of the watershed used for agriculture and 40% forested.
The Site is located in an active cattle pasture surrounded by wooded lots, small agricultural operations,
and rural residential areas. Prior to construction activities, the streams on the Site were heavily
impacted by cattle, which led to stream bank erosion and instability.
The following project goals were established to address the effects from watershed and project site
stressors:
• Reduce nutrient loads within the watershed and to downstream waters;
• Stabilize eroding stream banks greatly reducing sediment loads;
• Restore riffle/pool sequencing resulting in decreased water temperatures and increased
dissolved oxygen concentrations;
• Establish in -stream structures to improve habitat diversity and trap detritus;
• Restore native vegetation and riparian buffers; and
• Protect the restored land in perpetuity through a conservation easement.
These goals were achieved by restoring 3,096 LF of perennial and intermittent stream channel and
enhancing 4,232 LF of perennial stream channel. Restoration and enhancement construction and
planting efforts were completed in December 2013. A conservation easement is in place on 24.4 acres of
riparian corridor and stream resources to protect them in perpetuity.
Monitoring Year 4 (MY -4) monitoring and site visits were completed between the months of January and
October 2017 to assess the conditions of the Site. All streams within the Site are stable and functioning
as designed. Repair work was performed on sections of Byrds Creek Reach 3 during the spring of 2017.
Overall, these isolated sections totaled approximately 200 liner feet in length. The Site's overall average
planted stem density of 520 stems per acre is greater than the success criteria of 260 stems per acre
density required for MY -5. Hydrologic monitoring gages documented bankfull events for all streams on
the Site. All streams have met the MY -5 hydrology success criteria.
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report — FINAL

BYRDS CREEK MITIGATION SITE
Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1:
PROJECT OVERVIEW.......................................................................................................1-1
Figure 1
1.1
Project Goals and Objectives.....................................................................................................1-1
Project Component/Asset Map
1.2
Monitoring Year 4 Data Assessment..........................................................................................1-2
Table 2
1.2.1
Vegetative Assessment......................................................................................................1-2
Project Contact Table
1.2.2
Vegetation Areas of Concern.............................................................................................1-3
Table 12a -f
1.2.3
Stream Assessment............................................................................................................1-3
Longitudinal Profile Plots
1.2.4
Stream Areas of Concern...................................................................................................1-4
1.2.5
Hydrology Assessment.......................................................................................................1-4
Hydrology Summary Data
1.2.6
Maintenance Plan..............................................................................................................1-4
1.3
Monitoring Year 4 Summary......................................................................................................1-4
Section 2:
METHODOLOGY.............................................................................................................2-1
Section 3:
REFERENCES...................................................................................................................3-1
I'_11141,11L7101*i
Appendix 1
General Tables and Figures
Figure 1
Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2
Project Component/Asset Map
Table 1
Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3
Project Contact Table
Table 4
Project Information and Attributes
Appendix 2
Visual Assessment Data
Figure 3
Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Table 5a -i
Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Table 6
Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Appendix 4
Stream Photographs
Table 10a -c
Vegetation Photographs
Appendix 3
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7
Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Table 8
CVS Vegetation Table — Metadata
Table 9
Planted and Total Stem Counts
Appendix 4
Morphological Summary Data and Plots
Table 10a -c
Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 11
Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters — Cross Section)
Table 12a -f
Monitoring Data — Stream Reach Data Summary
Longitudinal Profile Plots
Cross Section Plots
Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Appendix 5
Hydrology Summary Data
Table 13
Verification of Bankfull Events
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report — FINAL ii

Section 1: PROJECT OVERVIEW
The Byrds Creek Mitigation Site, hereafter referred to as the Site, is located in southwestern Person
County within the Neuse River Basin (USGS Hydrologic Unit 03020201). The project site is located south
of Hurdle Mills off of Wolfe Road and is in the Carolina Slate Belt of the Piedmont Physiographic
Province (USGS, 1998). The Multi -Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium (MRLC, 2001) classified
approximately 57% of the land in the project watershed as managed herbaceous cover or agricultural,
42% is classified as forested/scrubland, and the remaining 1% is open water. The drainage area for the
Byrds Creek Site is 2,957 acres (4.62 square miles).
The project stream reaches consist of Byrds Creek reach 2 (BC2), Byrds Creek reach 3 (130), South
branch (S131), Southeast branch reach 1 (SEI), and Southeast branch reach 2 (SE2) which are stream
restoration and/or enhancement level I approach. The project also consists of Byrds Creek reach 1 (BC1),
Byrds Creek reach 4 (BC4), and West branch (WB1) which are enhancement level 11 approach. Mitigation
work within the Site included restoring and enhancing 7,328 linear feet of perennial and intermittent
stream channel. The stream areas were also planted with native vegetation to improve habitat and
protect water quality. The project provides 5,371 stream mitigation units (SMU's). The final mitigation
plan was submitted and accepted by DMS in January 2013. Construction activities were completed by
North State Environmental in September 2013 and planting and seeding activities were completed by
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc. in December 2013. Baseline monitoring (MY -0) was conducted between
September 2013 and January 2014. Annual monitoring will be conducted for five years with the close-
out anticipated to commence in 2019 given the success criteria are met. Appendix 1 provides more
detailed project activity, history, contact information, and watershed/site background information for
this project. Three separate conservation easements have been recorded and are in place along the
riparian corridors and stream resources to protect them in perpetuity. Directions and a map of the Site
are provided in Figure 1 and project components are illustrated for the Site in Figure 2.
1.1 Project Goals and Objectives
Prior to construction activities, the streams on the Byrds Creek Site were heavily impacted by cattle,
which led to stream bank erosion and instability. Related degradation included declining aquatic habitat,
loss of forest, degraded riparian buffers, and water quality problems related to increased sediment and
nutrient loadings. Tables 10a -c in Appendix 4 present the pre -restoration conditions in detail.
The Site was designed to meet the over -arching goals as described in the mitigation plan (Wildlands,
2013). The project is intended to provide numerous ecological benefits within the Neuse River Basin.
While many of these benefits are limited to the Site, others, such as pollutant removal and improved
aquatic and terrestrial habitat, have more far-reaching effects. The following project specific goals
established in the mitigation plan included:
• Reduce nutrient loads within the watershed and to downstream waters;
• Stabilize eroding stream banks greatly reducing sediment loads;
• Restore riffle/pool sequencing resulting in decreased water temperatures and increased
dissolved oxygen concentrations;
• Establish in -stream structures to improve habitat diversity and trap detritus;
• Restore native vegetation and riparian buffers; and
• Protect the restored land in perpetuity through a conservation easement.
The design features of this project were developed to achieve multiple project objectives. The stream
restoration reaches were designed to frequently flood the reconnected floodplain. This design approach
provides more frequent dissipation of energy from higher flows (bankfull and above) to improve channel
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
41100 Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report — FINAL 1-1

stability; provide water quality treatment through detention, settling, and biological removal of
pollutants; and restore a more natural hydrologic regime. The project objectives defined in the
mitigation plan (Wildlands, 2013) are as follows:
• On-site nutrient inputs will be decreased by removing cattle from streams and filtering on-site
runoff through buffer zones. Off-site nutrient input will be absorbed on-site by filtering flood
flows through restored floodplain areas, where flood flow will spread through native vegetation.
Vegetation is expected to uptake excess nutrients.
• Stream bank erosion which contributes sediment load to the creek will be greatly reduced in the
project area. Eroding stream banks will be stabilized using bioengineering, natural channel
design techniques, and grading to reduce bank angles and bank height. Storm flow containing
grit and fine sediment will be filtered through restored floodplain areas, where flow will spread
through native vegetation. Spreading flood flows will also reduce velocity and allow sediment to
settle out. Sediment transport capacity of restored reaches will be improved so that capacity
balances more closely to load. Sediment load reduction will be monitored through assessing
bank stability with cross section and profile surveys and visual assessment through photo
documentation which serves as an accepted surrogate for direct turbidity measurements.
• Restored riffle/pool sequences will promote aeration of water and create deep water zones,
helping to lower water temperature. Establishment and maintenance of riparian buffers will
create long-term shading of the channel flow to minimize thermal heating. Lower water
temperatures will help maintain dissolved oxygen concentrations.
• In -stream structures will be constructed to improve habitat diversity and trap detritus. Wood
habitat structures will be included in the stream as part of the restoration design. Such
structures may include log drops and rock structures that incorporate woody debris.
• Adjacent buffer and riparian habitats will be restored with native vegetation as part of the
project. Native vegetation will provide cover and food for terrestrial creatures. Native plant
species will be planted and invasive species will be treated. Eroding and unstable areas will also
be stabilized with vegetation as part of this project.
• The restored land will be protected in perpetuity through a conservation easement.
The design streams were restored to the appropriate type based on the surrounding landscape, climate,
and natural vegetation communities but also with strong consideration to existing watershed conditions
and trajectory. The designs were developed to correct incision and lack of pattern caused by
channelization, bank instability caused by erosion and livestock access, lack of vegetation in riparian
zones, and lack of riparian and aquatic habitat.
1.2 Monitoring Year 4 Data Assessment
Annual monitoring and site visits were conducted during MY -4 to assess the condition of the project.
The stream success criteria for the Site follows the approved success criteria presented in the Byrds
Creek Mitigation Plan (Wildlands, 2013).
1.2.1 Vegetative Assessment
A total of 14 vegetation plots were established within the project easement area during the baseline
monitoring. Thirteen of the plots were established as standard 10 meter by 10 meter plots with one plot
established as a 5 meter by 20 meter plot. The final vegetative success criteria will be the survival of 260
planted stems per acre in the riparian corridor along restored and enhanced reaches at the end of MY -5.
The MY -4 vegetative survey was completed in August 2017. The 2017 annual vegetation monitoring
resulted in an average planted stem density of 520 stems per acre, which is greater than the
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report — FINAL 1-2

requirement of 260 stems per acre. All 14 vegetation plots met success criteria during MY -4. The MY -4
planted stem density is approximately 30% less than the baseline density recorded (734 stems per acre)
in January 2014. There is an average of 12 stems per plot and all plots are on track to meet the success
criteria required for MY -5. Refer to Appendix 2 for vegetation plot photographs and the vegetation
condition assessment table and Appendix 3 for vegetation data tables.
1.2.2 Vegetation Areas of Concern
During a site visit in December 2017 it was discovered that an area of the easement, approximately 0.46
acres, along Byrds Creek Reach 4 had been mowed. After a discussion with the landowner it was
determined that he had allowed a family member to hunt his property. This family member mowed
shooting lanes into the easement. The landowner has talked to this family member and assured
Wildlands this will not happen again. The property owner is working with Wildlands to fix this issue.
Wildlands will replant this area with trees of a similar age and size to the ones that were mowed. Refer
to the CCPV Map in Appendix 2 for the areas of easement encroachment and Table 6 for acreages.
1.2.3 Stream Assessment
Morphological surveys for MY -4 were conducted in May 2017. All streams within the Site are stable with
little to no erosion and have met the success criteria for MY -4. Refer to Appendix 2 for the visual
assessment table, integrated current condition plan view (CCPV) map (Figure 3), and reference
photographs. Refer to Appendix 4 for the morphological data and plots.
While there have been some minor post -construction adjustments within the restored channels; the
cross sections show little to no change in the bankfull area, maximum depth ratio, or width -to -depth
ratio. Surveyed riffle cross sections fell within the parameters defined for channels of the appropriate
Rosgen stream type. The surveyed longitudinal profile data for BC2, BC3, S131, SE1, SE2a and SE2b
illustrates that the bedform features are maintaining lateral and vertical stability. The riffles are
remaining steeper and shallower than the pools, while the pools are remaining deeper than the riffles
and maintaining flat water surface slopes. The longitudinal profiles show that the bank height ratios
remain at or very near to 1.0 for the restoration reaches. Entrenchment ratios vary slightly from year to
year due to minor changes in bankfull widths. Small adjustments in width occur due to vegetation,
sediment deposition, and many other factors. These minor changes do not indicate channel instability.
Pattern data will be collected in MY -5 only if there are indicators from the profile or dimensions that
indicate significant geomorphic adjustments have occurred. No changes were observed during MY -4
that indicate a change in the radius of curvature or channel belt width.
Several beaver dams and a lodge were discovered in January 2017 (MY -4). All dams were on Byrds Creek
reach three, with the largest dam at approximately station 42+50. This beaver dam extended onto the
floodplain which caused water to flow out of the channel and onto the floodplain. Water was
impounded up to the culverts at the easement break near station 35+00. The USDA was contracted in
February 2017 to trap beaver and breach the dams at the Site. By the end of February 2017 seven
beaver had been trapped and all beaver dams were breached. Once water levels were back to baseflow,
Land Mechanics Designs, Inc. was hired to repair the damage associated with the beaver
impoundments. During repair work one large beaver dam, and three smaller dams (stations 36+00,
38+50, and 46+50) were removed. Stream banks damaged as a result of the dams were graded, seeded,
and matted. Near station 42+75 rilling and minor bank erosion had occurred from overland flow as a
result of the large beaver dam. Sod mats were added to this area to stabilize stream banks. The left
stream bank near station 46+50 had eroded around a small beaver dam. This area was stabilized using
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report — FINAL 1-3

brush, cobble, and soil, then the bank was seeded and matted. Live stakes were planted along stream
banks as needed to stabilize any repair areas and to replace vegetation removed by beaver activity.
1.2.4 Stream Areas of Concern
As of October 2017, beaver activity has not been observed on the Site since the removal in February
2017. Beaver presence and the areas of repair will continue to be monitored in subsequent years.
1.2.5 Hydrology Assessment
At the end of the five year monitoring period, two or more bankfull events must have occurred in
separate years within the restoration reaches. Bankfull events were recorded on all three gaged streams
during the MY -4 data collection. Byrds Creek and South Branch have each had bankfull events during
MY -1, MY -2, MY -3, and MY -4. Therefore, they have met the hydrology success criteria for the Site.
Southeast Branch recorded bankfull events during MY -2, MY -3, and MY -4, also meeting hydrology
success criteria. Refer to Appendix 5 for hydrologic data.
1.2.6 Maintenance Plan
No maintenance is required at this time.
1.3 Monitoring Year 4 Summary
All streams within the Site are stable and functioning as designed. The average planted stem density for
the Site is 520 stems per acre and is on track to meet the MY -5 success criteria. Bankfull events were
documented with gages located on all three streams during MY -4. The MY -5 stream hydrology success
criteria has been met on Byrds Creek, South Branch, and Southeast Branch. Beaver activity was observed
at the beginning of MY -4, but no activity has been detected since repairs were completed in the spring
of MY -4.
Summary information and data related to the performance of the project and monitoring elements can
be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting
information formerly found in these reports can be found in the Mitigation Plan documents available on
DMS's website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available from DMS
upon request.
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report — FINAL 1-4

Section 2: METHODOLOGY
Geomorphic data was collected following the standards outlined in The Stream Channel Reference Site:
An Illustrated Guide to Field Techniques (Harrelson et al., 1994) and in the Stream Restoration: A Natural
Channel Design Handbook (Doll et al., 2003). Longitudinal and cross-sectional data were collected using
a total station and were georeferenced. All CCPV mapping was recorded using a Trimble handheld GPS
with sub -meter accuracy and processed using Pathfinder and ArcView. Crest gages were installed in
surveyed riffle cross sections and monitored quarterly. Hydrology attainment installation and
monitoring methods are in accordance with the USACE (2003) standards. Vegetation monitoring
protocols followed the Carolina Vegetation Survey -DMS Level 2 Protocol (Lee et al., 2008). Reporting
follows the DMS Monitoring Report Template and Guidance Version 1.3 (DMS, 2010).
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report — FINAL 2-1

Section 3: REFERENCES
Doll, B.A., Grabow, G.L., Hall, K.A., Halley, J., Harman, W.A., Jennings, G.D., and Wise, D.E. 2003. Stream
Restoration A Natural Channel Design Handbook.
Harrelson, C.C., Rawlins, C.L., Potyondy, J.P. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated Guide
to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM -245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 61 p.
Lee, M.T., Peet, R.K., S.D., Wentworth, T.R. 2008. CVS -DMS Protocol for Recording Vegetation Version
4.2. Retrieved from http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/protocol/cvs-eep-protocol-v4.2-lev1-S.pdf.
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (DMS). 2010. Monitoring Report Template and Guidance.
Version 1.3. Raleigh, NC.
Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169-199.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Pagosa Springs, CO: Wildland Hydrology Books.
Rosgen, D.L. 1997. A Geomorphological Approach to Restoration of Incised Rivers. Proceedings of the
Conference on Management of Landscapes Disturbed by Channel Incision. Center For
Computational Hydroscience and Bioengineering, Oxford Campus, University of Mississippi, Pages
12-22.
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACE, NCDEQ-
DWR, USEPA, NCWRC.
United States Geological Survey (USGS). 1998. North Carolina Geology.
http://www.geology.enr.state.nc.us/usgs/carolina.htm.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2013. Byrds Creek Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan. DMS, Raleigh, NC.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2014. Byrds Creek Mitigation Site Baseline Monitoring Document and As -
Built Baseline Report. DMS, Raleigh, NC.
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report — FINAL 3-1

APPENDIX 1. General Tables and Figures

Hydrologic Unit Code (14)
- DMS Targeted Local Watershed
J J
J I.z se ,•
a
'Z
r 0%6
5 O
°J
I 01-"'14
I
500 �� sn�A
i n
0301'104061030
I
03010104062020
�, �,' � � F+o x t�• ra
�.,�
—�--- Leasbus9
. may
creme _.
0302•Q201010010
Flqt
pq"r �
ale
c
Sa(ith F1atRiyer ;
1040610PO
0361010406107
Deep C,.
r�`rk
103020201010040
Tim berhle
Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map
tp W I L D L A N D S Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING 0 1 2 Miles
DMS Project No. 95020
I i i i I Monitoring Year 4- 2017
1
Person County, NC
PAIL
P�
0302 1010020-
°
!
creek
c e:
ayrds
jrC0 ~ •� _
... j
�
t
•I t
,i 03020201010030
[Project Location.,
r
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of the
NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) and is
Directions:
encompassed by a recorded conservation easement,
The Site is located in southwestern Person County,
but is bordered by land under private ownership. Accessing the
southwest of Roxboro. From Roxboro take
site may require traversing areas near or along the easement
Route 157 south 9.8 miles. Turn right on Charlie
boundary and therefore access by the general public is not
40
Monk Road. Travel 1.0 miles and turn left on Wolfe
permitted. Access by authorized personnel of state and
Road. Travel 0.4 miles to the end of Wolfe Road.
federal agencies or their designees/contractors involved in
The project site is located south and east of the end of
the development, oversight,and stewardship of the restoration
Wolfe Road and is bound by Route 157 to the west
site is permitted within the terms and time frames of their defined
and Walnut Grove Church Road to the east.
roles. Any intended site visitation or activity by any person
The site is within the Neuse River Basin
ork
outside of these previously sanctioned roles and activites
(HUC 03020201).
requires prior coordination with DMS.
0
Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map
tp W I L D L A N D S Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING 0 1 2 Miles
DMS Project No. 95020
I i i i I Monitoring Year 4- 2017
1
Person County, NC

Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancement I
Stream Enhancement II
16 ... I Easement Area
+ y ,
I
4
•
1+1
I •
Culverted Stream Crossing •
♦ �� Culverted Stream Crossing
■i ■
.■, ■ - Culverted Stream Crossing,' +
■ � i
Figure 2 Project Component/ Asset Map
W I L D L A N D S Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING 0 250 500 Feet DMS Project No. 95020
1 I I I I Monitoring Year 4- 2017
ML Person County, NC

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Nitrogen
Phosphorous
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non -Riparian Wetland
Buffer
Nutrient Offset
Nutrient Offset
Type R
RE
R
RE
R RE
Totals 1 5,371
0
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
As -Built
Existing
Footage (LF) /
Restoration or Restoration
Restoration Footage (LF) /
Mitigation
Credits
ReachlD
Stationing/
Approach
Acreage (Ac)
Equivalent
Acreage (Ac)
Ratio
(SMU / WMU)
Location (LF)
Streams
BC1
10+00-16+43
643
N/A
Enhancement Level II
643
2.5:1
257
BC2
16+43-32+89
1,630
N/A
Enhancement Level
1,646
1.5:1
1,097
32+89-34+05
BC3
1,368
Priority 1
Restoration
1,407
1:1
1,407
34+64-47+55
BC4
47+55-55+51
796
N/A
Enhancement Level II
796
2.5:1
318
60+00-66+48
SB1
976
Priority 1
Restoration
1,009
1:1
1,009
67+08-70+69
SE1
80+00-84+85
916
Priority 1
Restoration
485
1:1
485
SE2a
85+88-91+24
524
N/A
Enhancement Level
536
1.5:1
357
SE2b
91+24-93+19
50
Priority 1
Restoration
195
1:1
195
WB1
100+00-106+11
611
N/A
Enhancement Level II
611
2.5:1
244
Stream
(linear
Component Summation ML
Riparian Wetland Non -Riparian Wetland Buffer (square
Upland
Restoration Level
feet)
(acres)
(acres) feet)
(acres)
Riverine
Non-Riverine
3,096
-
-
- -
-
t
)
7Preservation
2,182
II
2,050
High Quality Preservation

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
'Seed and mulch is added as each section of construction is completed.
*Byrds Creek Mitigation Site is a 5 year credit release project.
Table 3. Project Contact Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Date
Complete
or Scheduled Delivery
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
January 2013
January 2013
Final Design -Construction Plans
June 2013
June 2013
Construction
September 2013
September 2013
Tem ora S&E mix applied to entire project area'
2889 Lowery Street
September 2013
September 2013
Permanent seed mix applied to reach/segments
September 2013
September 2013
Bare root and live stake plantings for reach/segments
December 2013
December 2013
Baseline Monitoring Document (Year 0)
Stream Survey
September 2013
January2014
January 2014
Vegetation Survey
Year 1 Monitoring
Stream Survey
March 2014
September 2014
December 2014
Ve etation Survey
Tree of Heaven Treatment
Winston Salem, NC 27101
August 2014
Additional Live Stake Planting
Green Resource, LLC
February 2015
Year 2 MonitoringDecember
Stream SurveyMarch
Vegetation Survey
2015
June 2015
2015
Tree of Heaven Treatment
Live Stakes
Foggy Mountain Nursery
July 2015
Stream Repair Work
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Stream and Vegetation Monitoring, POC
January 2016
Year 3 Monitoring
Stream SurveyMarch
Ve etation Survey
2016
June 2016
December 2016
Stream Repair Work
March 2017
Year 4 Monitoring
Stream Survey
Ve etation Survey
May 2017
August 2017
December 2017
Year 5 Monitoring
,Stream
Stream Survey2018
Survey
2018
December 2018
'Seed and mulch is added as each section of construction is completed.
*Byrds Creek Mitigation Site is a 5 year credit release project.
Table 3. Project Contact Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Designer
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Jeff Keaton, PE
Raleigh, NC 27609
919.851.9986
North State Environmental
Construction Contractor
2889 Lowery Street
Winston Salem, NC 27101
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
Planting Contractor
P.O. Box 1197
Fremont, NC 27830
North State Environmental
Seeding Contractor
2889 Lowery Street
Winston Salem, NC 27101
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resource, LLC
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Bare Roots
ArborGlen, Inc
Live Stakes
Foggy Mountain Nursery
Monitoring Performers
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Stream and Vegetation Monitoring, POC
Jason Lorch
919.851.9986, ext. 107

Table 4. Project Information and Attributes
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Project Name
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
County
Person County
Project Area (acres)
24.4
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
36. 14.744' N, 79. 79. 2.636'W
Physiographic Province
Carolina Slate Belt of the Piedmont Physiographic Province
River Basin
Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit
03020201
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit
03020201010020
DWQ Sub -basin
03-04-01
Project Drainiage Area (acres)
2,957 ac
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
<1%
CGIA Land Use Classification
57% managed herbaceous cover/agricultural, 42%forested/scrubland, 1% open water
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
BC1
BC2
BC3 BC4 SBI SEI
SE2a
SE2b
WBI
Length of reach (linear feet) - Post -Restoration
643
1,646
1,407 796 1,009 485
536
195
611
Drainage area (acres)
2,635
2,637
2,703 2,957 164 56
62
1 62
255
NCDWQ stream identification score
51.75 25.75
46.25
46.75
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification
WS -III, NSW
Morphological Desription (stream type)
P
P
P
P
I
P
P
P
P
Evolutionary trend (Simon's Model) - Pre- Restoration
IVN
IV
IV/\(
IV
III
IV/V
III/IV
III/IV
IV/V
Underlying mapped soils
Chewacla / Georgeville Loam
Drainage class
--- ---
--- ------ ---
---
---
---
Soil Hydric status
--- ---
--- ------ ---
---
---
---
--
---
FEMA classification
--- ---
--- --- ---
Native vegetation community
Piedmont bottomland forest
Percent composition exotic invasive vegetation -Post-
Restoration
JL
alim
0.8%
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable? Resolved?
Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States - Section 404
Waters of the United States - Section 401
X X
X X
USACE Nationwide Permit No.27 and DWQ401 Water Quality Certification No. 3885
Division of Land Quality (Dam Safety)
N/A N/A
N/A
Endangered Species Act
X X
Byrds Creek Mitigation Plan; no critical habitat for listed species exists within the project area (Pedestrian Survey)
Historic Preservation Act
X X
No historic resources were found to be impacted (letter from SHPO)
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA)
N/A N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
N/A N/A
N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat
N/A N/A
N/A

APPENDIX 2. Visual Assessment Data

v
XS5
00
0
PP #3
`
XS1 �
SPP #15
`
XS2
1001,
•��•�•
`lr= PP
i
II
m j
/
, r• I r I
I•'•!
`
J. �1
/
PP #1 .�
/��'�. Car -•�• ��
•�
•�� PP #35 PP #36
,10
1
XS11 i
PP #23
X10
SI (N PP t22
�1
31 I�, PP k21
1 �� 1
1 �
1
F V20 1
'Y PP #19
• ► - ti IN'7- . c v� - • r
• �.-* " w i
MI
` ' � j,. • t= ' �� �3,.1.
fit• � l; ,' �,.
2016 Aerial Photography
0
r %
SPP #15
1001,
m j
/
P/4'
/
j XS9 /
XS8
I
PP #13j
49
`•�•�
t
PP #12 1
,.% 1 �h i
,d
-
�. d �`�•
PP,
1 SE Branch Reach 2b
S, XS7 ` PP #10 m
PP
1•,• S
rF �'�•�Branch Reach
-: ��'�� PP #3�
I'll
PP #26
%.I
IPP
�•�.�•
#29 SE Branch Reach
�XS15'�•�. XS14
�•7
�•1 PP #251
�•�•—•—•—._.
i^ XS13 XS12fit
j
•�.�• PP #27
�•�• �'
PP #24
1
XS11 i
PP #23
X10
SI (N PP t22
�1
31 I�, PP k21
1 �� 1
1 �
1
F V20 1
'Y PP #19
• ► - ti IN'7- . c v� - • r
• �.-* " w i
MI
` ' � j,. • t= ' �� �3,.1.
fit• � l; ,' �,.
2016 Aerial Photography
0

Table 5a. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Byrds Creek Reach 1 (643 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %Stable,
Unstable Unstable Performing as
Segments Footage Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Bed
Condition
n/a
Length Appropriate
n/a
n/a
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
n/a
n/a
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
n/a
n/a
n/a
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
n/a
n/a
n/a
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
n/a
n/a
n/a
baseflow

Table 5b. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Byrds Creek Reach 2 (1,646 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %Stable,
Unstable Unstable Performing as
Segments Footage Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
10
10
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
9
9
100%
1. Bed
Condition
100%
Length Appropriate
9
9
100%
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
9
9
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
9
9
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
10
3. Mass Wasting
JBank slumping, caving, or collapse
1 0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
2
2
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
1
1
100%
3. Engineered
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
1
1
100%
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
2
2
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
1
1
100%
baseflow

Table 5c. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Byrds Creek Reach 3 (1,407 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %Stable,
Unstable Unstable Performing as
Segments Footage Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
11
11
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
11
11
100%
1. Bed
Condition
100%
Length Appropriate
11
11
100%
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
11
11
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
11
11
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
JBank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
1 0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
5
5
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
3
3
100%
3. Engineered
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
3
3
100%
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
3
3
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
1
1
100%
baseflow

Table Sd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Byrds Creek Reach 4 (796 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %Stable,
Unstable Unstable Performing as
Segments Footage Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Bed
Condition
n/a
Length Appropriate
n/a
n/a
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
n/a
n/a
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
10
3. Mass Wasting
JBank slumping, caving, or collapse
1 0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
n/a
n/a
n/a
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
n/a
n/a
n/a
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
n/a
n/a
n/a
baseflow

Table 5e. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
South Branch Reach 1 (1,009 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of
Unstable Unstable
Segments Footage
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0
100%
Degradation
0 0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
17 17
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
14 14
100%
1. Bed
Condition
Length Appropriate
14 14
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
14 14
100%
lweg centering at downstream of
Fmeanderbend(Glide)
14 14
100%
1
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
n/a
n/a
n/a
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Za. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
n/a
n/a
n/a
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
n/a
n/a
n/a
baseflow

Table 5f. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Southeast Reach 1 (485 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %Stable,
Unstable Unstable Performing as
Segments Footage Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
12
12
n/a
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
7
7
n/a
1. Bed
Condition
n/a
Length Appropriate
7
7
n/a
n/a
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
7
7
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
7
7
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
11
11
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
11
11
100%
3. Engineered
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
11
11
100%
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
11
11
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
n/a
n/a
n/a
baseflow

Table Sg. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Southeast Reach 2a (536 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %Stable,
Unstable Unstable Performing as
Segments Footage Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
12
12
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
8
8
100%
1. Bed
Condition
100%
Length Appropriate
8
8
100%
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
8
8
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
8
8
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
9
9
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
6
6
100%
3. Engineered
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
6
6
100%
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
9
9
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
3
3
100%
baseflow

Table 5h. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Southeast Reach 2b (195 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %Stable,
Unstable Unstable Performing as
Segments Footage Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
4
4
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
3
3
100%
1. Bed
Condition
100%
Length Appropriate
3
3
100%
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
3
3
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
3
3
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
3
3
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
3
3
100%
3. Engineered
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
3
3
100%
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
3
3
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
n/a
n/a
n/a
baseflow

Table 5i. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
West Branch Reach 1 (611 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %Stable,
Unstable Unstable Performing as
Segments Footage Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Bed
Condition
n/a
Length Appropriate
n/a
n/a
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
n/a
n/a
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
10
3. Mass Wasting
JBank slumping, caving, or collapse
1 0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
n/a
n/a
n/a
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
n/a
n/a
n/a
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
n/a
n/a
n/a
baseflow

Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Planted Acreage 38
Easement Acreage 38
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Number
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
%of
Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
none 2 0.46 1.2%
Combined
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
of
Planted
Acreage
(Ac)
Polygons
Acreage
Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material
0.1
0
0
0.0%
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count
Low Stem Density Areas
0.1
0
0.0
0.0%
criteria.
Total
0
0.0
0.0%
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring
Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
0.25 Ac
0
0
0.0%
year.
Cumulative Total
0
0.0
0.0%
Easement Acreage 38
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping Number Combined %of
Threshold of Planted
Acreage
(SF) Polygons Acreage
Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
1,000 0 0 0.0%
Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
none 2 0.46 1.2%

Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 1— looking upstream (05/18/2017)
PHOTO POINT 1— looking downstream (05/18/2017)
PHOTO POINT 2 — looking upstream (05/18/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 2 — looking downstream (05/18/2017)
PHOTO POINT 3 — looking upstream (05/18/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 3 — looking downstream (05/18/2017)

PHOTO POINT 7 —looking upstream (05/18/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 7 — looking downstream (05/18/2017)
PHOTO POINT 8 —looking upstream (05/18/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 8 — looking downstream (05/18/2017)
PHOTO POINT 9 — looking upstream (05/18/2017) PHOTO POINT 9 — looking downstream (05/18/2017)

PHOTO POINT 10 — looking upstream (05/18/2017)
PHOTO POINT 10 — looking downstream (05/18/2017)
PHOTO POINT 11— looking upstream (05/18/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 11— looking downstream (05/18/2017)
PHOTO POINT 12 — looking upstream (05/18/2017)
PHOTO POINT 12 — looking downstream (05/18/2017)

PHOTO POINT 13 — looking upstream (05/18/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 13 — looking downstream (05/18/2017)
PHOTO POINT 14 — looking upstream (05/18/2017)
PHOTO POINT 14—looking downstream (05/18/2017)

4 WA
a�
�,`�� a ;• �-
it
2B
h �1 ` i
M
•fit' W i�,, � �" {.aa'���,.� r1 `4`A - - k..

PHOTO POINT 21— looking upstream (05/18/2017)
PHOTO POINT 21— looking downstream (05/18/2017)
PHOTO POINT 22 — looking upstream (05/18/2017) PHOTO POINT 22 — looking downstream (05/18/2017)
PHOTO POINT 23 — looking upstream (05/18/2017)
PHOTO POINT 23 — looking downstream (05/18/2017)

PHOTO POINT 24 — looking upstream (05/18/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 24 — looking downstream (05/18/2017)
PHOTO POINT 25 — looking upstream (05/18/2017)
PHOTO POINT 25 — looking downstream (05/18/2017)
PHOTO POINT 26 — looking upstream (05/18/2017)
PHOTO POINT 26 — looking downstream (05/18/2017)

44
��'� t� ,sem` `� �` �• r � � `�
1 E
� ��`` j �� t L .� �? "1 t"�%" � c � ..-, jY� S��S'1t'y►i '+�.t` db$' ? i. 1
�. y �- � 1.r , � ,�. (•� 4 s;� � �. =�'oy y�� jiJ _C � �St."� -a& y,� �y� 1 � � �s„
i
� F
-
a - +
� a
3
i

PHOTO POINT 30 — looking upstream (05/18/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 30 — looking downstream (05/18/2017)
PHOTO POINT 31— looking upstream (05/18/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 31— looking downstream (05/18/2017)

r-
� e
L XF
71-
'_
PHOTO POINT 33 — looking upstream (05/18/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 33 — looking downstream (05/18/2017)
PHOTO POINT 34 — looking upstream (05/18/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 34 — looking downstream (05/18/2017)
PHOTO POINT 35 — looking upstream (05/18/2017)
PHOTO POINT 35 — looking downstream (05/18/2017)

PHOTO POINT 36 — looking upstream (05/18/2017) 1 PHOTO POINT 36 — looking downstream (05/18/2017)

Vegetation Photographs

i
kr 1 �y
4
Ov
a r
f �� ¢ �-
IN
" 31
A
w -
y�
4
l
\
kr 1 �y
4
Ov
a r
f �� ¢ �-
IN
" 31
A
w -
y�
01.
-
3
ice(
�J
ice(
LL
� j1
�
1

VEG PLOT 7 (08/21/2017) VEG PLOT 8 (08/21/2017)
VEG PLOT 9 (08/21/2017)
VEG PLOT 10 (08/21/2017)
VEG PLOT 11 (08/21/2017) 1 VEG PLOT 12 (08/21/2017)

Alyfir.. A. � •xE .T,: � ;
a�
d
3'
1
Woe` [ � - �_ �H• {
OPPt i ~

APPENDIX 3. Vegetation Plot Data

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Plot
MY4 Success Criteria
Met (Y/N)
Tract Mean
1
Y
100
2
Y
3
Y
4
Y
5
Y
6
Y
7
Y
8
Y
9
Y
10
Y
11
Y
12
Y
13
Y
14
Y

Table 8. CVS Vegetation Table - Metadata
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Database name
Byrds Creek MY4 cvs-eep-entrytool-v2.3.1.mdb
Database location
F:\Projects\005-02128 Byrds Creek\Monitoring\Year 4\Vegetation Assessment
Computer name
CAROLYN
File size
55648256
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This excludes live stakes.
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
1A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code
95020
project Name
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Description
Stream Mitigation Site
River Basin
Neuse
Sampled Plots
14

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Current Plot Data (MY4 2017)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95020-01-0001
PnoLS P -all T
95020-01-0002
PnoLS P -all T
95020-01-0003
PnoLS P -all T
95020-01-0004
PnoLS P -all T
95020-01-0005
PnoLS P -all T
Acer negundo
boxelder
Tree
1
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
Baccharis halimifolia
eastern baccharis
Shrub
5
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
6
1
1
1
1
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
Carya
hickory
Tree
1
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
2
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
Fagus grandifolia
American beech
Tree
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
2
2
3
8
8
8
7
7
12
13
13
13
1
1
1
luglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
2
1
luniperus virginiana
eastern redcedar
Tree
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
5
4
3
20
8
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
1
8
4
4
24
1
1
8
2
3
3
3
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
3
2
6
6
26
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Rhus copallinum
Iflameleaf sumac
Ishrub
Stem count 8
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count 6
Stems per ACRE 323.7
8
1
0.02
6
323.7 1
24
9
971.2
18
7
728.4 1
18
1
0.02
7
728.4
48
9
1942
10 1
4
404.7
10
1
0.02
4
404.71
32
8
12951566.61566.61
14
2
14
1
0.02
2
42
7
1700
13 1
6
526.1
13
1
0.02
6
526.1
47
8
1902
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Current Plot Data (MY4 2017)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95020-01-0006
PnoLS P -all T
95020-01-0007
PnoLS P -all T
95020-01-0008
PnoLS P -all T
95020-01-0009
PnoLS P -all T
95020-01-0010
PnoLS P -all T
Acer negundo
boxelder
Tree
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
Baccharis halimifolia
eastern baccharis
Shrub
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
1
1
1
Carya
hickory
Tree
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
1
Fagus grandifolia
American beech
Tree
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
4
5
5
5
12
12
12
luglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
luniperus virginiana
eastern redcedar
Tree
1
1
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
18
12
12
3
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
9
4
4
6
2
2
2
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
4
4
4
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
Rhus copallinum
Iflameleaf sumac
Ishrub
I
I
I I
1
Stem count 14
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count 7
Stems per ACRE 566.6
14
1
0.02
7
566.6 1
33
9
1335
7
6
283.3
7
1
0.02
6
1 283.31
8
7
323.7
13 1
8
526.1
13
1
0.02
8
526.11
36
9
1457
14
5
1566.6 1
14
1
0.02
5
566.61
30
8
1214
17 1
4
688
17
1
0.02
4
688
1 20
5
809.4
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY4 2017)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95020-01-0011
PnoLS P -all T
95020-01-0012
PnoLS P -all T
95020-01-0013
Pnol-S P -all T
95020-01-0014
PnoLS P -all T
Acer negundo
boxelder
Tree
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
8
Baccharis halimifolia
eastern baccharis
Shrub
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
4
4
4
2
2
2
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
Carya
hickory
Tree
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
1
1
1
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
Fagus grandifolia
American beech
Tree
5
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
5
5
5
2
2
2
4
4
4
6
6
6
luglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
luniperus virginiana
eastern redcedar
Tree
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
5
10
14
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
1
6
3
3
53
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
4
4
4
4
4
4
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
1
1
Rhus copallinum
Iflameleaf sumac
Ishrub
I
1
Stem count 11 1
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count 5 1
Stems per ACRE 445.2
11
1
0.02
5
445.2 1
16
5
647.5
12
7
485.6
12 1
1
0.02
7 1
1485.6 1728.4
18
9
16 176
5
647.5
1
1
0.02
5 1
647.5 1
34
7
1376
1313
5 1
526.11526.11
1
0.02
5 1
82
7
3318
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
MY4 (2017)
PnoLS P -all T
MY3 (2016)
PnoLS P -all T
MY2 (2015)
PnoLS P -all T
MY1 (2014)
PnoLS P -all T
MYO (2014)
PnoLS P -all T
Acer negundo
boxelder
Tree
1
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
8
4
Baccharis halimifolia
eastern baccharis
Shrub
5
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
19
19
26
18
18
18
24
24
24
29
29
29
41
41
41
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
12
12
12
Carya
hickory
Tree
1
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
2
11
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
S
5
5
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
8
8
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
1
Fagus grandifolia
American beech
Tree
5
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
71
71
80
69
69
73
75
75
83
73
73
73
72
72
72
luglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
3
luniperus virginiana
eastern redcedar
Tree
2
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
114
32
102
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
23
23
124
23
23
63
25
25
81
40
40
40
49
49
49
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
27
27
51
27
27
27
30
30
70
31
31
31
32
32
32
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
13
13
13
19
19
19
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
17
17
21
17
17
17
22
22
26
20
20
20
13
13
13
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
6
6
7
7
7
7
8
8
14
9
9
9
16
16
16
Rhus copallinum
Iflameleaf sumac
Ishrub
2
Stem count 180
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count 9
Stems per ACRE 1520.3
180
14
0.35
9
520.3
470
20
1359
180
9
520.3
180
14
0.35
9
520.3
260
11
751.6
204
9
589.7
204
14
0.35
9
589.7 1
431
11
1246
226
9
1653.3 1
226
14
0.35
9
653.31
226
9
653.3
254 1
8
734.2
254
14
0.35
8
734.2
254
8
734.2
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

APPENDIX 4. Morphological Summary Data and Plots

Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Bvrds Creek
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
'UT Cane Creek reference reach data only utilized for pattern and a reference point in the project specific regional curve.
'Data only utilized as a reference point on the the project -specific drainage area -discharge curve.
'Existing condition sinuosity based on valley length/channel length given no flow and therefore no water sureface shots at time of survey.
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
'Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth ofthe bankfull channel.
Parameter
Gage
Byrds Creek
Reach 2
Byrds Creek
Reach 3
Spencer Creek1
Downstream
UT Cane Creek
UT Richland Creek
UpstreamZ
Z
UT Rocky Branch
Byrds Creek
Reach 2
Byrds Creek
Reach 3
Byrds Creek
Reach 2
Byrds Creek
Reach 3
Min Max
Min Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min Max
Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
N/A
19.0 26.1
27.4 35.9
10.7
11.2
11.5
12.3
8.8
10.4
12.2
33.2
38.3
25.0
28.9 42.7
20.4 36.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
145 231 116 124 60.0 114+ 31.0 27.6 31.4 72.0 156 160 95 350 150+ 150+
150+ 150+
Bankfull Mean Depth
2.2 3.4 1.9 2.3 1.6 1.8 0.8 1.0 0.8 0.9 1.3 1.6 1.9 1.8 1.6 2.1
1.0 1.4
Bankfull Max Depth
3.8 4.4 2.6 3.4 2.1 2.6 1.2 1.6 1.1 1.3 1.8 2.8 3.2 2.8 2.9 3.4
2.1 3.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftz
58.4 64.5 62.5 66.7 17.8 19.7 8.9 12.2 7.8 8.5 16.3 59.8 61.5 45.3 56.2 88.7
28.8 37.4
Width/Depth Ratio
5.6 11.7 9.3 19.3 5.8 7.1 12.3 14.4 10.0 12.8 9.1 18.0 24.5 13.8 14.8 22.2
14.5 36.5
Entrenchment Ratl04
5.5 12.1 3.2 5.5 5.5 10.2 >2.5 2.5 4.0 6.0 4.1 4.8 3.8 14.0 3.5+ 5.2+
4.7+ 7.4+
Bank Height Ratios
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 1 1.0 1.4 2.1 1.001.0 1.0 1.0
1.0 1.0
D50 (mm)
0.41 22.6 --- --- - 12.5 2604
29.3 45.0
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
---
---
--
---
13 59
12 57
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0074 0.0075
0.0043 0.0133
0.0130
0.0188
0.0704
0.0210
0.0450
0.0606 0.0892
0.0029
0.0052
0.0076 0.0134
0.0036 0.0097
0.0022 0.0190
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
34 179
46 129
Pool Max Depth (ft)
N/A
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
1.21 2.58
0.97 2.43
Pool Spacing (ft)
54
103
70
124
71
27
73
N/A
26 1 81
102
211
60
141
84 278
73 129
Pool Volume (ft)
---
---
-
---
--
---
---
---
---
---
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
38
41
102
N/A
N/A
52
116
26 57
31 62
Radius of Curvature (ft)
N/A N/A 11 1s 23 38 N/A N/A 50 80 19 79
44 84
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
--- --- 1.0 1.3 2.0 3.1 N/A N/A --- 2.0 3.2 0.7 1.9
2.2 2.3
Meander Length (ft)
N/A N/A 46 48 45 81 N/A N/A 177 263 279 603
190 255
Meander Width Ratio
3.6 3.7 3.9 6.6 N/A N/A 2.1 4.6 0.9 1.3
1.5 1.7
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
N/A
-
-
-
-
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
--- --- --- --- --- --
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
SC/0.19/0.41/116/ SC/0.41/22.6/ SC/SC/SC/55/
232/>2048 143.4/2048/>2048 --- --- --- --- --- --- 128/362
SC/SC/sC/107.3/
362/>2048
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib/ft
--- --- --- --- --- --- 69 1.71 N/A
-- 0.
0.23 0.31
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
--- -- --- - - - -- --
---
Stream Power (Capacity) W m
--- --- ----- --- -
---
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
N/A
4.12
4.22
0.96
0.29
0.28
1.10
4.12
4.22
4.12
4.22
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
1% <1% --- --- --- --- 1% <1% 1%
<1%
Rosgen Classification
C5/ES C4/E4 E4 C4/E4 C4/E4 E4b C4 C4 C4
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
2.7 3.0 2.5 2.5 4.9 5.4 3.8 3.5 4.1 5.5 3.0 3.3 4.6 3.6
7.3
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
97 40 29.1 3z.o 85.0 200 210 200
210
Q-NFF regression
--- --- --
Q-USGS extrapolation
--- --- --- ----- --- --- --- ---
Q-Mannings
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
---
Valley Length (ft)
--- --- ----- ---
---
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,630 1,368 --- --- --- --- 1,630 1,402 1,646
1,407
Sinuosity
1.18 1.01 1.30 1.40 1.00 1.10 1.11 1.18
1.06
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2
--- --- --- --- --- -- 0.0039 0.0016
0.0043
Bankfull Slope (ftft)
--- --- --- --- --- --- 0.0046 0.0013
0.0042
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
'UT Cane Creek reference reach data only utilized for pattern and a reference point in the project specific regional curve.
'Data only utilized as a reference point on the the project -specific drainage area -discharge curve.
'Existing condition sinuosity based on valley length/channel length given no flow and therefore no water sureface shots at time of survey.
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
'Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth ofthe bankfull channel.

Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
South Branch and Southeast Branch
16
94
Parameter
Gage
South Branch
Reach 1
Southeast Branch
Reach 1
Spencer Creek
Upstream
UT Richland Creek
Downstream
1
UT Cane Creek
UT Richland Creek
UpstreaM2
UT Rocky Branch 2
South Branch
Reach 1
Southeast Branch
Reach 1
South Branch
Reach 1
Southeast Branch
Reach 1
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min I Max
Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
N/A
7.4 7.9
7.7
8.7
13.3
15.2
11.5
12.3
8.8
10.4
12.2
10.0
8.0
9.3
19.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
96.0 98.0 9.5 229.0 >50 31.0 27.6 31.4 72.0 70.0 375.0 30 100 >100
>75
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.0 1.2 0.8 1.2 1.1 1.3 0.8 1.0 0.8 0.9 1.3 1.0 0.7 0.7
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth
2.3 2.4 1.0 1.9 1.8 2.1 1.2 1.6 1.1 1.3 1.8 1.3 1.0 1.4
1.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftz
8.0 8.7 6.2 10.6 16.5 17.5 8.9 12.2 7.8 8.5 16.3 9.6 5.7 6.5
9.6
Width/Depth Ratio
6.2 7.8 9.6 7.3 10.1 13.9 12.3 14.4 10.0 12.8 9.1 10.4 11.2 13.4
37.7
Entrenchment Ratio'
12.4 13.1 1.2 26.3 >2.5 >2.5 2.5 4.0 6.0 7.0 37.5 3.8 12.5 >2.2
>2.2
Bank Height Ratios
1.0 3.7 1.0 1.4 2.1 --- 1.4 2.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
1.0 0.09 56.1
28.5
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
8 46
10 28
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0176 0.0349
0.0247 0.049
0.0188 0.0704
0.0183
0.0355
0.0188
0.0704
0.0210
0.0450
0.0606 0.0892
0.0052 0.0199
0.0220 0.0410
0.0021 0.0178
0.0023 0.0527
Pool Length (ft)
-
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
20 64
7 45
Pool Max Depth (ft)
N/A
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.4 2.2
0.9 2.3
Pool Spacing (ft)
30
62
35
1 90
13 47
33
93
27
73
N/A
26 1 81
34
85
21
53
36 116
26 58
Pool Volume (ft)
---
---
---
---
--
---
---
---
---
---
---
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
24 52
NA
102
N/A
N/A
25
48
16
39
14 35
10 27
Radius of Curvature (ft)
N/A N/A 5.4 22.1 NA 23 38 N/A N/A 20 35 18 26 17 32
14 30
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
0.6 2.5 NA 2.0 3.1 N/A N/A 2.0 3.5 2.3 3.3 1.8 3.4
1.3 2.9
Meander Length (ft)
N/A N/A 54 196 NA 45 81 N/A N/A 76 120 47 93 78 127
65 74
Meander Width Ratio
2.8 6 NA 3.9 6.6 N/A N/A 7.6 12.0 S.9 11.6 8.4 13.6
6.3 7.1
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
-
-
-
-
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
---
---
---
---
---
--
---
---
---
---
---
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
N/A
sC/sC/1.0/45/
107.33/180
SC/sC/0.09/26.23
/50.61/180
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
SC/SC/SC/103.6/
256/362
SC/SC/SC/68.1/
180/362
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib/ft2
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.28
0.98
0.94
1.34
0.23
0.43
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
---
---
-
-
-
-
---
-
---
--
Stream Power (Capacity) W/M21
I---
---
--
--
---
---
---
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
N/A
0.25
0.09
o.so
0.97
0.29
0.28
1.10
0.25
0.09
0.25
0.09
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate %
<i% 1% -- --- --- --- --- <1% 1% <1%
1%
Rosgen Classification
E5 E6/G6 E4 C4/E4 C4/E4 C4/E4 E4b E4 E4 C3
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
3.7 2.8 4.2
F 4.5 3.8 3.5 4.1 5.5 3.1 3.5 4.6
2.1
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
68.9
1 78.6 40 29.1 1 32.0 85.0 30 20 30
20
Q-NFF regression
-- --
Q-USGS extrapolation
--- --- --- ----- --- --- --- --- ---
---
Q-Mannings
--- -- -
Valley Length (ft)
--- --- ----- --- --- --- --- --- ---
---
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
976 916 -- -- -- -- -- 971 792 1,009
485
Sinuosity
1.03 1.31 1.40 1.10 1.40 1.00 1.10 --- 1.13 1.06
1.18
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2
--- --- --- --- --- -- 0.0068 0.0161 0.0070
0.0138
Bankfull Slope (ftft)
--- - - -- -- 0.0075 0.0182 0.0068
0.0136
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
'UT Cane Creek reference reach data only utilized for pattern and a reference point in the project specific regional curve.
'Data only utilized as a reference point on the the project -specific drainage area -discharge curve.
'Existing condition sinuosity based on valley length/channel length given no flow and therefore no water sureface shots at time of survey.
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
'Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth ofthe bankfull channel.

Table 10c. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Southeast Branch
�Ellll
Pre -Restoration
Condition
Reference
Reach Data
sign
Built/Baseline
Parameter
Gage
Southeast Branch
Reach 2
Spencer Creek
Upstream
UT Richland Creek 1
Downstream UT Cane Creek
UT Richland Creek
Upstreamz
UT Rocky Branch Z
Southeast Branch
Reach 2a
Southeast Branch
Reach 2b
Southeast Branch
Reach 2a
Southeast Branch
Reach 2b
Min Max
Min Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min Max
Min
Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
N/A
7.2 7.4
8.7
13.3
15.2
11.5
1
12.3
8.8
10.4
12.2
11.7
15.0
9.0
10.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
8.0 9.8 229.0 >50 31.0 27.6 31.4 72.0 114.7 120.1 lao.o 310.0 >100
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.3 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.3 0.8 1.0 0.8 0.9 1.3 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.6
Bankfull Max Depth
1.6 1.9 1.9 1.8 2.1 1.2 1.6 1.1 1.3 1.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
8.9 9.4 10.6 16.5 17.5 8.9 12.2 7.5 8.5 16.3 10.2 10.5 6.5 6.8
Width/Depth Ratio
5.8 7.3 7.3 10.1 13.9 12.3 14.4 10.0 12.8 9.1 13.5 21.3 12.5 16.5
Entrenchment Rdtl04
1.6 6.2 26.3 >2.5 >2.5 2.5 4.0 6.0 7.7 10.3 15.6 34.4 >2.2
Bank Height Ratios
1.5 2.1 1.0 1.4 2.1 1.4 2.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
D50 (mm)
0.04 - 37.2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
4 20
11 36
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0047 1 0.0147
O.O1S8 0.0704
0.0183
0.0355
0.0188
0.0704
0.0210
0.0450
0.0606 0.0892
0.0122
0.0367
0.0202
0.0145 0.0454
0.0119 0.0606
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
21 53
27 45
Pool Max Depth (ft)
N/A
---
---
---
---
---
---
--
---
---
1.3 2.6
0.89 2.23
Pool Spacing (ft)
17
122
13 1 47
33
93
27
73
N/A
26 1 81
27
55
43 49
25 S4
34 73
Pool Volume (ft)
---
---
---
--
---
---
---
---
---
---
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
N/A
24 52
NA
102
N/A
N/A
N/A
27
3 22
12
22
Radius of Curvature (ft)
N/A
5.4 22.1
NA
23
38
N/A
N/A
N/A
22
30
7 58
21
1 25
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
N/A
0.6 2.5
NA
2.0
3.1
N/A
N/A
N/A
2.4
3.3
0.7 5.5
N/A
Meander Length (ft)
N/A
54 196
NA
45
81
N/A
N/A
N/A
82.0
43 80
88 1 88
Meander Width Ratio
2.8 6
NA
3.9
6.6
N/A
N/A
N/A
3.0
4.1 7.5
N/A
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
---
---
---
---
---
--
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
---
--
-
--
---
--
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
N/A
SC/0.02/0.04/0.05/33.2
/79.6
SC/SC/SC/70.9/
256/362
SC/SC/SC/70.9/
256/362
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib/ftZ
---
-
-
-
-
--
0.93
1.14
0.93 1.14
0.47
N/A
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
---
---
---
---
--
---
---
---
---
---
Stream Power (Capacity) W/mZ
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
N/A
0.09
0.50
0.97
0.29
0.28
1.10
0.09
0.10
0.09
0.10
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
1% --- --- --- --- --- 1% 1% 1%
1%
Rosgen Classification
E6/G6 E4 C4/E4 C4/E4 C4/E4 E4b C4 C4 C4
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
2.9 T 3.4 4.2
4.5 3.8 3.5
4.1 5.5 3.0 3.3 3.1 4.4
N/A
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
- 6s.9
78.6 40 29.1
32.0 85.0 30 20 30
N/A
Q-NFF regression
--- --- ----- --- --- --- --- ---
---
Q-USGS extrapolation
--- - - --
Q-Mannings
--- --- ----- --- --- --- --- ---
---
Valley Length
--- - - ----- ---
---
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
524 --- --- --- 533 180 536
195
Sinuosity
1.17 1.40 1.10 1.40 1.00 1.10 --- 1.21 1.11
1.23
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)Z
--- --- --- --- --- -- --- 0.0101 0.0144
0.0160
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
i i i i i i i i 0.0122 0.0146
0.01sa
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
'UT Cane Creek reference reach data only utilized for pattern and a reference point in the project specific regional curve.
'Data only utilized as a reference point on the the project -specific drainage area -discharge curve.
'Existing condition sinuosity based on valley length/channel length given no flow and therefore no water sureface shots at time of survey.
`Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
'Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth ofthe bankfull channel.

Table 11. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Section)
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Dimension and Substrate
Base
Cross
MY1
Section
MY2
I (Riffle)
I MY3
MY4MY5
Base
Cross
MY1
Section
MY2 I
2 (Pool)
MY3
Byrds Creek - Reach 2
Cross
MY4 FIMY5 Base MY1
Section
MY2 I
3 (Riffle)
MY3
MY4
FmY5
Base
Cross
MY1
Section
MY2
4 (Riffle)
I MY3
MY4 7MY5
based on fixed bankfull elevation
574.4
574.6
574.2
572.6
Bankfull Width (ft)
36.4
36.6
35.3
35.6
35.9
42.2
42.1
42.6
40.3
40.3
28.9
24.7
22.9
22.1
20.8
42.7
36.0
36.9
32.8
33.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.6
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.9
1.9
1.9
2.0
2.0
1.9
2.1
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.2
2.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.9
2.7
2.7
2.7
3.1
4.6
4.5
4.3
4.3
4.4
3.4
3.2
3.2
3.1
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.3
3.1
3.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
59.8
51.1
50.6
50.6
53.4
80.3
79.9
79.6
79.3
80.8
56.2
51.6
46.5
45.9
45.7
88.7
78.3
83.9
73.4
76.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
22.2
26.2
24.6
25.0
24.1
22.1
22.2
22.8
20.5
20.1
14.8
11.8
11.3
10.6
9.5
20.6
16.6
16.2
14.6
14.7
Entrenchment Ratio'
4.5+
4.1+
4.2+
4.2+
4.2+
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5.2+
6.1+
6.6+
6.8+
7.2+
3.4+
4.2+
4.1+
4.6+
4.5+
Bank Height Ratio'
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 (mm)
12.5
28.7
18.0
19.0
24.2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
26.4
42.9
28.1
37.9
25.0
22.6
32.0
36.4
1 29.8
49.1
Dimension and Substrate
Base
Byrds Creek - Reach 2
Cross Section 5 (Pool)
MY1 MY2 I MY3 MY4
MY5
Base
Cross
MY1
Section
MY2 I
6 (Pool)
MY3
MY4 7MY5
Base
Byrds Creek - Reach 3
Cross Section 7 (Riffle)
MY1 MY2 I MY3 MY4
Mk--
71MY5
Base
Cross
MY1
Section
MY2
8 (Riffle)
I MY3
-AM
MY4 MY5
based on fixed bankfull elevation
572.0
569.0
568.7
565.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
34.8
34.3
35.3
32.2
32.4
26.2
25.4
25.9
29.6E
20.4
22.6
23.4
21.2
22.5
17.6
17.6
18.3
19.5
20.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.4
2.3
2.5
2.2
2.3
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.41.4
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.2
1.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.7
4.3
4.5
4.1
4.0
3.2
3.0
3.1
2.92.1
2.2
2.4
2.1
2.3
2.3
2.1
2.2
2.1
2.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
84.3
80.2
86.7
71.4
73.2
47.5
45.8
47.8
40.328.8
31.0
31.0
26.6
29.2
20.5
23.4
24.9
23.2
25.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
14.3
14.7
14.4
14.5
14.4
14.4
14.1
14.1
21.714.4
16.5
17.7
16.8
17.3
15.1
13.3
13.4
16.3
15.8
Entrenchment Ratio'
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A7.4+
6.6+
6.4+
7.1+
6.7+
8.5+
8.5+
8.2+
7.7
7.4+
Bank Height Ratio'
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.01.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 (mm)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
29.3
41.3
37.2
52.1
16.0
45.0
49.1
66.2
70.2
11.6
Byrds Creek - Reach 3
Cross Section 9 (Pool)
Cross
Section
r (Riffle)
South Branch - Reach 1
Cross
Section
11 (P��
Southeast Branch - Reach 1
Cross Section 12 (Riffle)
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MY3
MY2
I MY3 I
MY4
MY5
Base
MY3 I
MY2 I
MY3
I MY4 FIMY5
Base
MY3
MY2 I
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY3
MY2
I MY3
MY4 MY5
based on fixed bankfull elevation
565.5
571.4
571.3
580.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
34.2
33.6
33.7
32.6
33.9
9.3
8.8
9.0
9.0
7.8
10.2
9.7
9.2
8.8
8.9
10.4
9.1
8.2
8.5
8.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>75
>75
>75
>75
>75
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.0
2.0
2.1
2.0
2.1
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.7
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.1
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.9
3.8
3.7
3.7
3.8
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.7
2.0
1.9
1.8
1.9
2.0
1.5
0.9
1.3
1.3
1.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
69.6
66.5
69.3
66.5
69.6
6.5
6.4
5.5
5.5
5.4
11.6
10.1
9.1
9.3
9.5
6.7
4.7
5.6
6.0
5.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
16.8
17.0
16.3
16.0
16.5
13.4
12.2
14.8
14.8
11.3
8.9
9.2
9.4
8.3
8.4
16.3
17.6
12.0
12.0
12.9
Entrenchment Ratio'
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
10.7+
11.4+
11.1+
11.1+
12.9+
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
7.2+
8.3+
9.1+
8.8+
8.0+
Bank Height Ratio'
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
.01.0
1.2-1.2-
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 (mm)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
56.1
9.4
30.9
29.3
9.5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
28.5
37.0
68.0
52.3
51.4
1111111111111116
Dimension and Substrate
based on fixed bankfull elevation
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
Entrenchment Ratio'
Bank Height Ratio'
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
d50 (mm)
Base
12.5
N/A
1.2
2.5
15.3
10.1
N/A
1.0
N/A
Southeast Branch - Reach 1
Cross Section 13 (Pool)
MY3 MY2 I MY3 MY4MY5
579.5
8.6 8.7 9.5 8.5
N/A N/A N/A N/A
1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0
2.3 2.0 2.0 2.1
9.4 9.5 10.3 8.9
7.9 8.0 8.8 8.1
N/A N/A N/A N/A
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Base
16.7
N/A
1.7
3.5
28.0
10.0
N/A
1.0
N/A
Cross
MY3
14.8
N/A
1.5
3.2
22.0
10.0
N/A
1.0
I N/A
Section 14 (Pool)
MY2 I MY3
572.7
13.0 12.2
N/A N/A
1.8 1.7
3.1 3.0
23.1 20.5
7.3 7.2
N/A N/A
1.0 1.0
N/A N/A
Southeast Branch - Reach 2
Cross
MY4 77MY5 Base MY3 I
13.2 10.6 9.7
N/A >100 >100
1.6 0.6 0.6
3.0 1.2 1.0
21.2 6.8 5.8
8.3 16.5 16.4
N/A 9.4+ 10.3+
1.0 1.0 1.0
I N/A 37.2 1 13.5
Section 15 (Riffle)
MY2 I MY3 I
572.6
9.3 9.0
>100 >100
0.5 0.7
1.0 1.3
4.9 5.9
17.6 13.8
10.8+ 11.1+
1.0 1.0
45.0 43.8
MY4
9.1
>100
0.8
1.3
7.7
10.8
11.0+
1.0
30.8
MY5
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.
* Data for cross sections 6, 8, & i2 were updated during MY2 for previous monitoring years. Cross sections 6 and 12 had an error in the spreadsheet that was corrected. The spreadsheet was
not calculating bankfull width correctly which affected cross-sectional area, and width to depth ratio. Bankfull elevation was corrected on cross section 8 after careful evaluation. It was
determined that during the baseline survey, bankfull was called at a higher elevation than it should have been.

Table 12a. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Bvrds Creek - Reach 2
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.
As-Built/Baseline
Min
Max
off-
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
I
Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
28.9
42.7
24.7
36.6
22.9
36.9
22.1
35.6
20.8
35.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.6
2.1
1.4
2.2
1.4
2.3
1.4
2.2
1.5
2.3
Bankfull Max Depth
2.9
3.4
2.7
3.2
2.7
3.3
2.7
3.1
3.1
3.2
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (fe)
56.2
88.7
51.1
78.3
46.5
83.9
45.9
73.4
45.7
76.7
Width/Depth Ratio
14.8
22.2
11.8
26.2
11.3
24.6
10.6
25.0
9.5
24.1
Entrenchment Ratio'
3.4+
5.2+
4.1+
6.1+
4.1+
6.6+
4.2+
6.8+
4.2+
7.2+
Bank Height Ration
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
12.5
1
26.4
28.7
1
42.9
18.0
36.4
19.0
37.9
24.2
49.1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
13
59
12
59
18
59
12
59
14
59
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0036
0.0097
0.0019
0.0147
0.0003
0.0110
0.0009
0.0138
0.0025
0.0147
Pool Length (ft)
34
179
34
182
59
183
70
185
30
165
Pool Max Depth (ft)
3.7
4.6
4.3
4.5
4.2
5.8
3.6
4.8
3.1
5.0
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pool volume (fe)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wave Length (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
84
26
19
0.7
279
0.9
278
57
79
1.9
603
1.3
80
214
81
225
85
211
107
219
Rosgen Classification
C4
71.2
C4
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,646
1,6467
1,646
1,646
1,646
Sinuosity (ft)
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)l
0.0016
0.0018
0.0019
0.0017
0.0017
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/c135/cI5O/cI84/d95/d100
0.0013
0.2/0.6/5.6/55/128/362
0.0018
0.3/1.2/2.9/75.9/122.5/256
0.0020
0.21/1.0/3.7/80.3/168.1/362"0.34/1.24/2.4/85.0/163.3/362.0
0.0016
0.0017
0.55/0.99/4.0/92.1/175.7/512.0
%of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%
0%
0%
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.

Table 12b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
gyros �reex - meacn a
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
17.6
20.4
17.6
22.6
18.3
23.4
19.5
21.2
20.2
22.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.2
1.4
1.3
1.4
1.3
1.4
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.3
Bankfull Max Depth
2.1
2.3
2.1
2.2
2.2
2.4
2.1
2.1
2.3
2.3
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (ft')
20.5
28.8
23.4
31.0
24.9
31.0
23.2
26.6
25.8
29.2
Width/Depth Ratio
14.4
15.1
13.3
16.5
13.4
17.7
16.3
16.8
15.8
17.3
Entrenchment Ratio'
7.4+
8.5+
6.6+
8.5+
6.4+
8.2+
7.1+
7.7+
6.7+
7.4+
Bank Height Rati02
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
29.3
45.0
41.3
49.1
37.2
66.2
52.1
70.2
42.7
68.3
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
12
57
26
43
18
44
28
44
24
45
Riffle Slope(ft/ft)
0.0022
0.0190
0.0065
0.0311
0.0018
0.0304
0.0054
0.0304
0.0067
0.0263
Pool Length (ft)
46
129
33
134
32
132
31
134
31
128
Pool Max Depth (ft)
3.2
3.9
3.0
3.8
2.9
4.3
3.4
4.6
3.1
4.7
Pool Spacing (ft)
73
129
82
190
92
199
60
180
60
189
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
31
62
Radius of Curvature (ft)
44
84
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
2.2
2.3
Meander Wave Length (ft)
190
255
Meander Width Ratio
1.5
1.7
Additional Reach Parameters
"I,�4071!
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,407
1,407
1,407
1,407
Sinuosity (ft)
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft)
0.0043
0.0045
0.0052
0.0047
0.0046
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0042
0.0047
0.0047
0.0044
0.0047
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa°!o/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
0.1/0.6/16/107.3/362/>2048
0.2/9.1/29/82.6/180/362
0.2/1.68/32.0/112.6/430.5/2048
0.5/4.73/23.4/105.6/256.0/2048
0.34/1.47/5.8/54.6/89.8/180.0
%of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
20%
4%
0%
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.

Table 12c. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
South Branch - Reach 1
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.
r
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.3
8.8
9.0
9.0
7.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.7
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (ft)
6.5
6.4
5.5
5.5
5.4
Width/Depth Ratio
13.4
12.2
14.8
14.8
11.3
Entrenchment Ratio'
10.7+
11.4+
11.1+
11.1+
12.9+
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
56.1
9.4
30.9
29.3
9.5
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
8
46
10
39
13
37
10
38
12
38
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0021
0.0178
0.0022
1
0.0431
0.0029
0.0298
0.0023
0.0409
0.0030
0.0573
Pool Length (ft)
20
64
22
1
65
21
1
67 1
21
69
20
1
62
Pool Max Depth (ft)
2.0
1.9
2.8
2.5
3.2
Pool Spacing (ft)
36
116
22
87
32
117
35
133
38
118
Pool Volume (fe)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
14
35
Radius of Curvature (ft)
17
32
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
1.8
3.4
Meander Wave Length (ft)
78
127
Meander Width Ratio
8.4
13.6
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C3
C3
C3
C3
C3
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,009
1,009
1,009
1,009
1,009
Sinuosity (ft)
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0070
1
0.0065
0.0078
0.0092
0.0079
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0068
0.0062
0.0070
0.0072
0.0061
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/cI50/cI84/d95/d100
SC/SC/SC/103.6/256/362
SC/0.2/5.3/71.7/141.1/180
SC/0.09/0.3/75.9/143.4/256
SC/SC/0.6/99.5/180/512
0.27/2.0/4.8/37.9/180.0/362.0
%of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%
0%
0%
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.

Table 12d. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Southeast Branch - Reach 1
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.
As-Built/Baseline
Min
Max
��Y-I
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
MY -4
Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.4
9.1
8.2
8.5
8.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
>75
>75
>75
>75
>75
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth
1.5
0.9
1.3
1.3
1.5
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (ft)
6.7
4.7
5.6
6.0
5.7
Width/Depth Ratio
16.3
17.6
12.0
12.0
12.9
Entrenchment Ratio'
7.2+
8.3+
9.1+
8,8+
8.0+
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
28.5
37.0
68.0
52.3
51.4
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
10
28
10
28
11
29
12
32
9
28
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0023
0.0527
0.0100
0.0390
0.0039
1
0.0630
0.0035
0.0612
0.0019
0.0290
Pool Length (ft)
7
45
10
54
19
48
19
47
18
41
Pool Max Depth (ft)
2.5
2.3
2.6
2.8
2.6
Pool Spacing (ft)
26
58
18
78
22
56
21
72
24
64
Pool Volume (fe)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
10
27
Radius of Curvature (ft)
14
30
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
1.3
2.9
Meander Wave Length (ft)
65
74
Meander Width Ratio
6.3
7.1
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
485
485
485
485
484
Sinuosity (ft)
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0138
0.0140
0.0133
0.0143
0.0141
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0136
0.0141
0.0126
0.0161
0.0171
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
SC/0.2/8/68.1/180/362
SC/0.1/4/67.2/151.8/362
SC/SC/0.3/86.7/180.0/512.0
SC/SC/4/101.2/170.1/256
SC/SC/0.3/84.6/151.8/256.0
%of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%
0%
0%
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.

Table 12e. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Southeast Branch - Reach 2a
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.
As-Built/Baseline
Min
Max
JEF-
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
--
Min
Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.6
9.7
9.3
9.0
9.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.8
Bankfull Max Depth
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.3
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (ft)
6.8
5.8
4.9
5.9
7.7
Width/Depth Ratio
16.5
16.4
17.6
13.8
10.8
Entrenchment Ratio'
9.4+
10.3+
10.8+
11.1+
11.0+
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
37.2
13.5
45.0
43.8
30.8
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
4
20
4
26
3
28
4
27
3
28
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0145
0.0454
0.0017
0.0845
0.0026
0.0750
0.0010
0.0834
0.0049
0.0758
Pool Length (ft)
21
53
9
44
16
49
10
48
12
47
Pool Max Depth (ft)
3.5
3.2
3.4
2.9
3.1
Pool Spacing (ft)
25
54
16
88
21
66
17
55
16
67
Pool Volume (fe)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
3
22
Radius of Curvature (ft)
7
58
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
0.7
5.5
Meander Wave Length (ft)
43
80
Meander Width Ratio
4.1
7.5
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
536
536
536
536
536
Sinuosity (ft)
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0144
0.0134
0.0137
0.0137
0.0125
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0146
0.0135
0.0148
0.0122
0.0136
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
SC/0.1/17.1/70.9/256/362
SC/0.1/18/78.1/143.4/362
SC/0.13/24.7/128.0/214.7/256
SC/0.16/6.3/82.6/180/512
SC/3.82/15.0/98.37/192.5/362.0
%of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%
0%
0%
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.

Table 12f. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Southeast Branch - Reach 2b
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.
As-Built/Baseline
Min
Max
��Y-i
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
MY -4
Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.6
9.7
9.3
9.0
9.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.8
Bankfull Max Depth
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.3
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (ft)
6.8
5.8
4.9
5.9
7.7
Width/Depth Ratio
16.5
16.4
17.6
13.8
10.8
Entrenchment Ratio'
9.4+
10.3+
10.8+
11.1+
11.0+
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
37.2
13.5
45.0
43.8
30.8
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
11
36
14
36
12
31
12
41
13
37
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0119
0.0606
0.0017
1
0.0520
0.0073
1
0.0580
0.0021
1
0.0494
0.0164
0.0866
Pool Length (ft)
27
45
27
1
44
28
45
28
46
30
55
Pool Max Depth (ft)
3.5
3.2
2.7
2.7
3.1
Pool Spacing (ft)
34
73
33
60
29
55
43
58
41
57
Pool Volume (ft3)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
12
22
Radius of Curvature (ft)
21
25
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
N/A
Meander Wave Length (ft)
88
88
Meander Width Ratio
N/A
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
195
195
195
195
195
Sinuosity (ft)
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0160
0.0085
0.0092
0.0124
0.0086
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0168
0.0092
0.0081
0.0122
0.0055
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/c135/cI5O/cI84/d95/d100
SC/0.1/17.1/70.9/256/362
SC/0.1/18/78.1/143.4/362
SC/0.13/24.7/128.0/214.7/256
SC/0.16/6.3/82.6/180/512
SC/3.82/15.0/98.37/192.5/362.0
%of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%
0%
0%
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Byrds Creek Reach 2
585
583
581
X
------- ----
-------------------
a
X
.n
x
579
577
575
573
571
v
569
O
567
X
v
w
565
563
561
559
557
555
1600
1700
1800 1900 2000 2100
2200 2300 2400 2500 2600
2700 2800 2900
3000
3100 3200 3300
Station (feet)
TWMYO-9/2013)
t TW (MYI-4/2014) TW (MY2-3/2015)
7W (MY3-3/2016)
TW (MY4-5/2017)
------- WS (MY4-5/2017) • BKF/70B (MY4-5/2017)
0 STRUCTURES (MY4-5/2017)
X
X
------- ----
-------------------
a
X
.n
x

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Byrds Creek Reach 3

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
South Branch Reach 1
585
580
575
v
w
570
0
v
565
560
555
6000 6100 6200 6300 6400 6500 6600 6700 6800 6900 7000 7100
Station (feet)
t TW (MYO-9/2013) TW (MY1-4/2014) TW (MY2-3/2015) t TW (MY3-3/2016) TW (MY4-5/2017)------- WS (MY4-5/2017) • BKF/TOB (MY4-5/2017)
x
x

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Southeast Reach 1
590
588
586
584
582
v
c 580
0
v
w 578
576
574
572
----------
♦
----------- -O
♦
X x
570
8000 8050 8100 8150 8200 8250 8300 8350 8400 8450
Station (feet)
-TW (MYO-9/2013) - TW (MYI-4/2014) -TW (MY2-3/2015) � TW (MY3-3/2016) - TW (MY4-5/2017)------- WS (MY4-5/2017) • BKF/rOB (MY4-5/2017) • STRUCTURES (MY4-5/2017)
8500

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Southeast Reach 2a
585
580
---- --------
57s
w
570
0
u
565
560
555
550
8550 8600
8650 8700 8750 8800
8850 8900 8950
9000 9050 9100 9150
Station (feet)
TW (MYO-9/2013)
TW (MYl-4/2014) t TW (MY2-3/2015) t TW (MY3-3/2016)
t TW (MY4-5/2017)------- WS (MY4-5/2017)
♦ BKF/TOB (MY4-5/2017) 0 STRUCTURES (MY4-5/2017)
---- --------
X X

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Southeast Reach 2b
572
570
568
--- --------------------------------- A
---------------
w
566
0
.j
v
w
564
562
560
558
9100 9150 9200 9250 9300 9350
Station (feet)
TW (MYO-9/2013) TW (MYl-4/2014) TW (MY2-3/2015) TW (MY3-3/2016) � TW (MY4-5/2017)------- WS(MY4-5/2017) • BKF/rOB (MY4-5/2017) 6 STRUCTURES(MY4-5/2017)

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 1-Byrds Creek Reach 2
16+62 Riffle
578
576
574
x
c
O
m 572
>
N
570
568
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
tMYO (9/2013) +MY1 (3/2014) tMY2 (3/2015) tMY3 (3/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) —Bankfull—Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
53.4
x -section area (ft.sq.)
35.9
width (ft)
1.5
mean depth (ft)
3.1
max depth (ft)
36.9
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.4
hyd radi (ft)
24.1
width -depth ratio
150.0
W flood prone area (ft)
4.2
entrenchment ratio
1.0
low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 2-Byrds Creek Reach 2
19+69 Pool
578
576
574 low P_
x
c
O
m 572
N
570
568
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
tMYO (9/2013) 4 MY1 (3/2014) tMY2 (3/2015) +MY3 (3/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
80.8
x -section area (ft.sq.)
40.3
width (ft)
2.0
mean depth (ft)
4.4
max depth (ft)
42.2
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.9
hyd radi (ft)
20.1
width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 3-Byrds Creek Reach 2
20+85 Riffle
578
576
c
574
O
_N
w 572
570
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
+MYO (9/2013) $ MY1 (3/2014) tMY2 (3/2015) tMY3 (3/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) —Bankfull—Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
45.7
x -section area (ft.sq.)
20.8
width (ft)
2.2
mean depth (ft)
3.2
max depth (ft)
22.6
wetted parimeter(ft)
2.0
hyd radi (ft)
9.5
width -depth ratio
150.0
W flood prone area (ft)
7.2
entrenchment ratio
1.0
low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 4-Byrds Creek Reach 2
Bankfull Dimensions
76.7
x -section area (ft.sq.)
33.6
width (ft)
2.3
mean depth (ft)
3.2
max depth (ft)
35.2
wetted parimeter(ft)
2.2
hyd radi (ft)
14.7
width -depth ratio
150.0
W flood prone area (ft)
4.5
entrenchment ratio
1.0
low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
11111100 Email
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 5-Byrds Creek Reach 2
30+93 Pool
576
574
572
x
c
O
570
_N
w 568
566
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Width (ft)
tMYO (9/2013) tMY1 (3/2014) tMY2 (3/2015) +MY3 (3/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
73.2
x -section area (ft.sq.)
32.4
width (ft)
2.3
mean depth (ft)
4.0
max depth (ft)
34.7
wetted parimeter(ft)
2.1
hyd radi (ft)
14.4
width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 6-Byrds Creek Reach 3
Bankfull Dimensions
43.6
x -section area (ft.sq.)
25.9
width (ft)
1.7
mean depth (ft)
3.0
max depth (ft)
27.4
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.6
hyd radi (ft)
15.4
width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 7- Byrds Creek Reach 3
Bankfull Dimensions
29.2
x -section area (ft.sq.)
22.5
width (ft)
1.3
mean depth (ft)
2.3
max depth (ft)
23.2
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.3
hyd radi (ft)
17.3
width -depth ratio
150.0
W flood prone area (ft)
6.7
entrenchment ratio
1.0
low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 8- Byrds Creek Reach 3
46+25 Riffle
568
566 110
x
c
O
v 564
562
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
tMYO (9/2013) $ MY1 (3/2014) tMY2 (3/2015) tMY3 (3/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) —Bankfull—Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
25.8
x -section area (ft.sq.)
20.2
width (ft)
1.3
mean depth (ft)
2.3
max depth (ft)
20.9
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.2
hyd radi (ft)
15.8
width -depth ratio
150.0
W flood prone area (ft)
7.4
entrenchment ratio
1.3
low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 9- Byrds Creek Reach 3
47+03 Pool
570
568
566
x
c
O
564
1 JAN
562
560
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Width (ft)
tMYO (9/2013) 4 MY1 (3/2014) tMY2 (3/2015) +MY3 (3/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
69.6
x -section area (ft.sq.)
33.9
width (ft)
2.1
mean depth (ft)
3.8
max depth (ft)
35.7
wetted parimeter(ft)
2.0
hyd radi (ft)
16.5
width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 10 -South Branch Reach 1
65+41 Riffle
574
572
xso
c
O
v 570
568
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
+MYO (9/2013) +MY1 (4/2014) tMY2 (3/2015) tMY3 (3/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) —Bankfull—Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
5.4
x -section area (ft.sq.)
7.8
width (ft)
0.7
mean depth (ft)
1.7
max depth (ft)
9.3
wetted parimeter(ft)
0.6
hyd radi (ft)
11.3
width -depth ratio
100.0
W flood prone area (ft)
12.9
entrenchment ratio
1.0
low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 11- South Branch Reach 1
65+54 Pool
574
572
x
c
O
v 570 low
568
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
tMYO (9/2013) 4 MY1 (4/2014) tMY2 (3/2015) +MY3 (3/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
9.5
x -section area (ft.sq.)
8.9
width (ft)
1.1
mean depth (ft)
2.0
max depth (ft)
10.6
wetted parimeter(ft)
0.9
hyd radi (ft)
8.4
width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 12 - Southeast Reach 1
82+39 Riffle
582
580
S
v
578
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
tMYO (9/2013) +MY1 (4/2014) tMY2 (3/2015) tMY3 (3/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) —Bankfull—Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
5.7
x -section area (ft.sq.)
8.6
width (ft)
0.7
mean depth (ft)
1.5
max depth (ft)
9.4
wetted parimeter(ft)
0.6
hyd radi (ft)
12.9
width -depth ratio
75.0
W flood prone area (ft)
8.8
entrenchment ratio
1.0
low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 13 - Southeast Reach 1
82+54 Pool
584
582
c
580
O
_N
w 578
576
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
tMYO (9/2013) 4 MY1 (4/2014) 4 MY2 (3/2015) +MY3 (3/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
8.9
x -section area (ft.sq.)
8.5
width (ft)
1.0
mean depth (ft)
2.1
max depth (ft)
11.5
wetted parimeter(ft)
0.8
hyd radi (ft)
8.1
width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 14 - Southeast Reach 2
88+10 Pool
576
574
c
572
O
_N
w 570
568
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
tMYO (9/2013) 4 MY1 (4/2014) tMY2 (3/2015) +MY3 (3/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
21.2
x -section area (ft.sq.)
13.2
width (ft)
1.6
mean depth (ft)
3.0
max depth (ft)
14.8
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.4
hyd radi (ft)
8.3
width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Cross Section 15 - Southeast Reach 2
88+35 Riffle
576
574 0-0
x
c
O
v 572
570
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
tMYO (9/2013) +MY1 (4/2014) tMY2 (3/2015) tMY3 (3/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) —Bankfull—Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
7.7
x -section area (ft.sq.)
9.1
width (ft)
0.8
mean depth (ft)
1.3
max depth (ft)
9.6
wetted parimeter(ft)
0.8
hyd radi (ft)
10.8
width -depth ratio
100.0
W flood prone area (ft)
11.0
entrenchment ratio
1.0
low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 5/2017
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Byrds Creek R2, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Particle Count
Riffle Pool Total
Reach Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
4.0
7
7
6
6
SPO
Very fine
0.062
0.125
6
Fine 0.125 0.250
6
Medium 0.25 0.50 7 7 6
13
Coarse 0.5 1.0 5 20 25 23
35
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 1 10 11 10
45
.GAP
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
4
4
4
49
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 1 1 1
50
Fine 4.0 5.6 4 4 4
54
Fine 5.6 8.0 1 3 4 4
57
Medium 8.0 11.0 2 2 2
59
Medium 11.0 16.0 3 3 6 5
65
Coarse 16.0 22.6 4 1 5 5
69
Coarse 22.6 32 1 1 1
70
Very Coarse 32 45 4 4 4
74
Very Coarse 45 64 6 6 5
79
`06
Small
64
90
5
70
5
5
84
Small 90 128 6 6 5
89
Large 128 180 7 7 6
95
Large 180 256 2 2 2
97
�p
Small
256
362
2
aJ
2
2
99
Small 362 512 1 1 1
100
Medium 512 1024
100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048
100
BEDROCK
113edrock
1 2048 1
>2048 1
a
50
100
Total 1
50
60
110
100
100
Byrds Creek R2, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90 Slit/Clay Sand avel
obble er
gp Bedrock
70
60
3 50
E
U= 40 10
y 30
U
a 20
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
MYO-02/2013 MYl-04/2014 - MY2-03/2015 --I MY3-03/2016 MY4-06/2017
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
0.55
D35 =
0.99
D50 =
4.0
D84 =
92.1
D95 =J
175.7
D100 =
1 512.0
Byrds Creek R2, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90 Slit/Clay Sand avel
obble er
gp Bedrock
70
60
3 50
E
U= 40 10
y 30
U
a 20
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
MYO-02/2013 MYl-04/2014 - MY2-03/2015 --I MY3-03/2016 MY4-06/2017
Byrds Creek R2, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
aJ
60
a
a
50
40
v
m
30
20
10
0
O• O•
Particle Class Size (mm)
0 MYO-02/2013
0 MYl-04/2014 MY2-03/2015 0 MY3-03/2016
0 MY4-06/2017

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 1
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Riffle 100-
Count
Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
24.2
D84 =
0
SPO
Very fine
0.062
0.125
0
Fine 0.125 0.250
0
Medium 0.25 0.50 2 2
2
Coarse 0.5 1.0 6 6
8
Very Coarse 1 1.0 1 2.0 1 4 4
12
o4y '
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
12
Very Fine 2.8 4.0
12
Fine 4.0 5.6
12
Fine 5.6 8.0 4 4
16
Medium 8.0 11.0 10 10
26
Medium 11.0 16.0 14 14
40
Coarse 16.0 22.6 8 8
48
Coarse 22.6 32 10 10
58
Very Coarse 32 45 6 6
64
Very Coarse 45 64 19 19
83
C4�
Small
64
90
9
9
92
Small 90 128 2 2
94
Large 128 180 4 4
98
Large 180 256
98
�p
Small
256
362
60
98
Small 362 512
98
Medium 512 1024 2 2
100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048
100
BEDROCK
113edrock
2048 1
>2048 1
a
50
100
Totall
100
1 100
100
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 1
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90 SilUClaySand.T�avel
bble er
80 Bedro
70
60
3 50
E
40
10
y 30
u
a°1 20
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--6- MYO-02/2013 MYl-04/2014 MY2-03/2015 ---0- MY3-03/2016 MY4-06/2017
Cross Section 1
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
8.00
D35 =
14.00
D50 =
24.2
D84 =
66.5
D95 =
139.4
D100 =
1024.0
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 1
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90 SilUClaySand.T�avel
bble er
80 Bedro
70
60
3 50
E
40
10
y 30
u
a°1 20
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--6- MYO-02/2013 MYl-04/2014 MY2-03/2015 ---0- MY3-03/2016 MY4-06/2017
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 1
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
a
60
v
a
50
th
40
U
R
30
3
20
10
0
o• O•
Particle Class Size (mm)
■ MYO-02/2013
MYl-04/2014 ■ MY2-03/2015 0 MY3-03/2016
0 MY4-06/2017

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 3
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Riffle 100-
Count
Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
25.0
D84 =
0
SPO
Very fine
0.062
0.125
0
Fine 0.125 0.250
0
Medium 0.25 0.50
0
Coarse 0.5 1.0 2 2
2
Very Coarse 1 1.0 2.0 8 8
10
o4y '
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
10
Very Fine 2.8 4.0
10
Fine 4.0 5.6 2 2
12
Fine 5.6 8.0 2 2
14
Medium 8.0 11.0 10 10
24
Medium 11.0 16.0 10 10
34
Coarse 16.0 22.6 12 12
46
Coarse 22.6 32 14 14
60
Very Coarse 32 45 12 12
72
Very Coarse 45 64 12 12
84
C4�
Small
64
90
6
6
90
Small 90 128 10 10
100
Large 128 180
100
Large 180 256
100
�p
Small
256
362
60
100
Small 362 512
100
Medium 512 1024
100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048
100
BEDROCK
IBedrock
2048 1
>2048
a
50
100
Total 1
100
100
1 100
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 3
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90
Si, lUClay and avel
bble er
80 Bedro
70
60
3 50
E
40
y 30
u
L°1 20
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--G� MYO-02/2013 MY1-04/2014 -w- MY2-03/2015 ---*- MY3-03/2016 MY4-06/2017
Cross Section 3
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
8.53
D35 =
16.47
D50 =
25.0
D84 =
64.0
D95 =
107.3
D100 =
128.0
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 3
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90
Si, lUClay and avel
bble er
80 Bedro
70
60
3 50
E
40
y 30
u
L°1 20
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--G� MYO-02/2013 MY1-04/2014 -w- MY2-03/2015 ---*- MY3-03/2016 MY4-06/2017
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 3
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
a
60
v
a
50
V)
th
40
U
R
3
30
20
10
0
o• O•
41 41Z,
110ti
Particle Class Size (mm)
■ MYO-02/2013
0 MYl-04/2014 ■ MY2-03/2015 0 MY3-03/2016
0 MY4-06/2017

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 4
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Riffle 100-
Count
Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
2
2
2
SPO
Very fine
0.062
0.125
2
Fine 0.125 0.250
2
Medium 0.25 0.50
2
Coarse 0.5 1.0 8 8
10
Very Coarse 1 1.0 1 2.0 1 8 8
18
o4y '
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
2
2
20
Very Fine 2.8 4.0
20
Fine 4.0 5.6 2 2
22
Fine 5.6 8.0 4 4
25
Medium 8.0 11.0
25
Medium 11.0 16.0 2 2
27
Coarse 16.0 22.6 2 2
29
Coarse 22.6 32 8 8
37
Very Coarse 32 45 10 10
47
Very Coarse 45 64 12 12
59
C4�
Small
64
90
12
12
71
Small 90 128 12 12
82
Large 128 180 8 8
90
Large 180 256 6 6
96
�p
Small
256
362
4
4
100
Small 362 512
100
Medium 512 1024
100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048
100
BEDROCK
IBedrock
2048 1
>2048 1
a
50
100
Totall
102
100
100
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 4
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90 Si, Clay and avel
b le er
80 Bedro
70
4' 60
3 50
E
40
y 30
u
a°1 20
10
0 E=L
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--G� MYO-02/2013 --- MYl-04/2014 MY2-03/2015 ---*- MY3-03/2016 MY4-06/2017
Cross Section 4
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
1.73
D35 =
28.96
D50 =
49.1
D84 =
137.5
D95 =
240.0
D100 =
362.0
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 4
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90 Si, Clay and avel
b le er
80 Bedro
70
4' 60
3 50
E
40
y 30
u
a°1 20
10
0 E=L
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--G� MYO-02/2013 --- MYl-04/2014 MY2-03/2015 ---*- MY3-03/2016 MY4-06/2017
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 4
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
a
60
v
a
50
V)
th
40
U
R
3
30
20
10
0
b.. I.. ilk -L..kpMl*
ti
o• O•
Particle Class Size (mm)
■ MYO-02/2013
0 MYl-04/2014 ■ MY2-03/2015 0 MY3-03/2016
0 MY4-06/2017

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Byrds Creek R3, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Particle Count
Riffle Pool Total
Reach Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
2
4
6
6
6
SPO
Very fine
0.062
0.125
6
Fine 0.125 0.250 2 6 8 8
14
Medium 0.25 0.50 1 4 5 5
19
Coarse 0.5 1.0 5 8 13 13
32
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 2 4 6 6
38
.GAP
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
1
1
1
39
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 2 4 6 6
45
Fine 4.0 5.6 3 2 5 5
50
Fine 5.6 8.0 4 2 6 6
55
Medium 8.0 11.0 6 3 9 9
64
Medium 11.0 16.0 1 2 3 3
67
Coarse 16.0 22.6 1 1 2 2
69
Coarse 22.6 32 6 1 7 7
76
Very Coarse 32 45 2 2 4 4
80
Very Coarse 45 64 3 4 7 7
87
`06
Small
64
90
5
3
8
8
95
Small 90 128 3 3 3
98
Large 128 180 2 2 2
100
Large 180 256
100
�p
Small
256
362
100
Small 362 512
100
Medium 512 1024
100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048
100
BEDROCK
113edrock
1 2048 1
>2048 1
1 1
1
100
Totall
50
1 51 1
101 1
100
100
Byrds Creek R3, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90 Silt/Clay Sand 0
avel
bble er
gp AOBedrock
70
60
3 50 -00
E
u 40
�.
y 30 to
U
a 20 J 100
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
0- MYO-02/2013 --*- MYl-04/2014 - MY2-03/2015 MY3-03/2016 MY4-06/2017
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
0.34
D35 =
1.47
D50 =
5.8
D84 =
54.6
D95 =J
89.8
D100 =
1 180.0
Byrds Creek R3, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90 Silt/Clay Sand 0
avel
bble er
gp AOBedrock
70
60
3 50 -00
E
u 40
�.
y 30 to
U
a 20 J 100
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
0- MYO-02/2013 --*- MYl-04/2014 - MY2-03/2015 MY3-03/2016 MY4-06/2017
Byrds Creek R3, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
aJ
60
a
a
12
50
40
v
m
30
20
10
0
Doti yti� otic o`' ti ti ti`s � �� w titi ti� �,�� 3ti �� o°` �o �,y� moo
o• o•
mho roti �titi tio�� tio��
�o�o
Particle Class Size (mm)
0 MYO-02/2013
0 MYl-04/2014 MY2-03/2015 0 MY3-03/2016
0 MY4-06/2017

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 7
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Riffle 100-
Count
Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
2
2
2
D95 =
Very fine
0.062
0.125
2
SQC��
Fine
0.125
0.250
2
2
4
Medium 0.25 0.50
4
Coarse 0.5 1.0
4
Very Coarse 1 1.0 2.0
4
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
2
2
6
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 14 14
20
Fine 4.0 5.6 16 16
36
Fine 5.6 8.0 6 6
42
Medium 8.0 11.0 4 4
46
Medium
11.0
16.0
4
4
50
Coarse 16.0 22.6 4 4
54
Coarse 22.6 32 2 2
56
Very Coarse 32 45
56
Very Coarse 45 64 4 4
60
Small
64
90
8
8
68
Small 90 128 10 10
78
Large28 180 10 10
88
Large 180 256 2 2
90
JPO
�p
Small
256
362
90
Small 362 512
90
Medium 512 1024 8 8
98
Large/Very Large 1024 2048 2 2
100
BEDROCK
113edrock
1 2048 1
>2048 1
100
Total 1
100
100
100
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 7
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90 Silt/Clay Sand. avel
le I 1 111,
er
80 Bedro
70
4 60
50
E
U? 40
y 30
CO' 20
00
10
Mi6v-00 —0 - 1� i ? .
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
MYO-02/2013 MYl-04/2014 MY2-03/2015 -0- MY3-03/2016 --- 8- MY4-06/2017
100
90
80
70
a,
60
Q)
a 50
V)
40
v
m 30
3
20
10
9
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 7
Individual Class Percent
o�L yL4i o Lh C3.y L L`b 0 h� 'b titi ti� �LC� �1 �5 �� CO OL0 O��b o��
0 o ti ti "
Particle Class Size (mm)
MYO-02/2013 MYl-04/2014 0 MY2-03/2015 0 MY3-03/2016 0 MY4-06/2017
Cross Section 7
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
3.61
D35 =
5.48
D50 =
16.0
D84 =
157.1
D95 =
789.6
D100 =
2048.0
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 7
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90 Silt/Clay Sand. avel
le I 1 111,
er
80 Bedro
70
4 60
50
E
U? 40
y 30
CO' 20
00
10
Mi6v-00 —0 - 1� i ? .
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
MYO-02/2013 MYl-04/2014 MY2-03/2015 -0- MY3-03/2016 --- 8- MY4-06/2017
100
90
80
70
a,
60
Q)
a 50
V)
40
v
m 30
3
20
10
9
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 7
Individual Class Percent
o�L yL4i o Lh C3.y L L`b 0 h� 'b titi ti� �LC� �1 �5 �� CO OL0 O��b o��
0 o ti ti "
Particle Class Size (mm)
MYO-02/2013 MYl-04/2014 0 MY2-03/2015 0 MY3-03/2016 0 MY4-06/2017

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 8
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Riffle 100-
Count
Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
6
6
6
D95 =
Very fine
0.062
0.125
6
SQC��
Fine
0.125
0.250
2
2
8
Medium 0.25 0.50
8
Coarse 0.5 1.0 2 2
10
Very Coarse 1 1.0 2.0 2 2
12
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
4
4
16
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 8 8
24
Fine 4.0 5.6 8 8
32
Fine 5.6 8.0 6 6
38
Medium 8.0 11.0 10 10
48
Medium
11.0
16.0
14
14
62
Coarse 16.0 22.6 6 6
68
Coarse 22.6 32 4 4
72
Very Coarse 32 45 2 2
74
Very Coarse 45 64 1 4 4
78
Small
64
90
10
10
88
Small 90 128 8 8
96
Large28 180 4 4
00
Large 180 256
100
JPO
�p
Small
256
362
100
Small 362 512
100
Medium 512 1024
100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048
100
BEDROCK
113edrock
1 2048 1
>2048 1
100
Total 1
100
100
100
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 8
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90 Silt/Clay Sand. avel
bble -Ter
80 Bedro
70Irlwoo
60 010
50
E
U? 40
y 30
U
a 20
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
0- MYO-02/2013 MYl-04/2014 MY2-03/2015 MY3-03/2016 --- 8- MY4-06/2017
100
90
80
70
a,
60
Q)
a 50
V)
40
v
m 30
3
20
10
9
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 8
Individual Class Percent
ooti �Lh o Lh Oh y L L`b 0 h� 'b titi ti� �LC� �L �5 0� CO oho
p• Qr y ti Dz
Particle Class Size (mm)
MYO-02/2013 MYl-04/2014 0 MY2-03/2015 0 MY3-03/2016 0 MY4-06/2017
Cross Section 8
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
2.80
D35 =
6.69
D50 =
11.6
D84 =
78.5
D95 =
122.5
D100 =
180.0
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 8
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90 Silt/Clay Sand. avel
bble -Ter
80 Bedro
70Irlwoo
60 010
50
E
U? 40
y 30
U
a 20
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
0- MYO-02/2013 MYl-04/2014 MY2-03/2015 MY3-03/2016 --- 8- MY4-06/2017
100
90
80
70
a,
60
Q)
a 50
V)
40
v
m 30
3
20
10
9
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 8
Individual Class Percent
ooti �Lh o Lh Oh y L L`b 0 h� 'b titi ti� �LC� �L �5 0� CO oho
p• Qr y ti Dz
Particle Class Size (mm)
MYO-02/2013 MYl-04/2014 0 MY2-03/2015 0 MY3-03/2016 0 MY4-06/2017

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
South Branch, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Particle Count
Riffle Pool Total
Reach Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
4.8
8
8
8
8
SPO
Very fine
0.062
0.125
2
2
2
10
Fine 0.125 0.250 1 4 5 5
15
Medium 0.25 0.50 2 6 8 8
23
Coarse 0.5 1.0 2 4 6 6
29
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 1 5 J 6 6
35
4WV
GAP
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
2
5
7
7
42
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 2 1 3 3
45
Fine 4.0 5.6 7 2 9 9
54
Fine 5.6 8.0 4 1 5 5
59
Medium 8.0 11.0 6 3 9 9
68
Medium 11.0 16.0 5 3 8 8
76
Coarse 16.0 22.6 2 3 5 5
81
Coarse 22.6 32 1 1 1
82
Very Coarse 32 45 2 2 4 4
86
Very Coarse 45 64 2 2 2
88
`p6
Small
64
90
2
70
2
2
90
Small 90 128 2 1 3 3
93
Large 128 180 2 2 2
95
Large 180 256 4 4 4
99
�p
Small
256
362
1
aJ
1
1
100
Small 362 512
100
Medium 512 1024
100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048
100
BEDROCK
113edrock
1 2048 1
>2048 1
1 1
1
50
100
Total 1
50
1 50 1
100 1
100
100
South Branch, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90 SilUClay and avel
We er
80 Bedrock
too
70
60
3 50PO
E
u 40
�.
y 30
U
a 20
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--0- MYO-02/2013 .. 0- MYl-04/2014 MY2-03/2015 MY3-03/2016 MY4-06/2017
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
0.27
D35 =
2.00
D50 =
4.8
D84 =
37.9
D95 =
180.0
D100 =
362.0
South Branch, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90 SilUClay and avel
We er
80 Bedrock
too
70
60
3 50PO
E
u 40
�.
y 30
U
a 20
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--0- MYO-02/2013 .. 0- MYl-04/2014 MY2-03/2015 MY3-03/2016 MY4-06/2017
South Branch, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
aJ
60
a
a
50
40
v
m
30
20
10
11
0
10, J,
-
ti ti �
o �� o°`
ooti yti� otic o`'
o• o•
tiw
�� titi do �,�� 3ti �o �,y� moo
mho roti �titi tio�� tio��
�000
Particle Class Size (mm)
0 MYO-02/2013
MYl-04/2014
MY2-03/2015 ■ MY3-03/2016
0 MY4-06/2017

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
South Branch, Cross Section 10
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Riffle 100-
Count
Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
1
1
1
SPO
Very fine
0.062
0.125
1
Fine 0.125 0.250 2 2
3
Medium 0.25 0.50 4 4
7
Coarse 0.5 1.0 6 6
13
Very Coarse 1 1.0 2.0
13
o4y
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
8
8
21
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 6 6
27
Fine 4.0 5.6 8 8
35
Fine 5.6 8.0 10 10
45
Medium 8.0 11.0 10 10
54
Medium 11.0 16.0 8 8
62
Coarse 16.0 22.6 2 2
64
Coarse 22.6 32 2 2
66
Very Coarse 32 45 2 2
68
Very Coarse 45 64 8 8
76
Small
64
90
4
4
80
Small 90 128 10 10
90
Large 128 180 10 10
100
Large 180 256
100
JPO
�p
Small
256
362
100
Small 362 512
100
Medium 512 1024
100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048
100
BEDROCK
113edrock
2048 1
>2048 1
v
1
1 100
Total 1
101
1 100
1 100
South Branch, Cross Section 10
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90 Si, Clay and avel
le er
80 Bedro
70
60
3 50
E
40
y 30
u
a°1 20
00
10
0
i==i=
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--G� MYO-02/2013 MYl-04/2014 MY2-03/2015 ---*- MY3-03/2016 MY4-06/2017
Cross Section 10
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
2.28
D35 =
5.67
D50 =
9.5
D84 =
103.0
D95 =
151.5
D100 =
180.0
South Branch, Cross Section 10
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90 Si, Clay and avel
le er
80 Bedro
70
60
3 50
E
40
y 30
u
a°1 20
00
10
0
i==i=
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--G� MYO-02/2013 MYl-04/2014 MY2-03/2015 ---*- MY3-03/2016 MY4-06/2017
South Branch, Cross Section 10
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
a
60
v
a
50
V)
th
40
U
R
3
30
20
10
4
0
11 4�" U AL L
1 1 1 1
o�ti yti� o�
ti ti ti� o �� titi ti� 1�1 Co 1�O 41Z, 110ti
otic
o• O•
���
Particle Class Size (mm)
■ MYO-02/2013
MYl-04/2014 ■ MY2-03/2015 0 MY3-03/2016
0 MY4-06/2017

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Southeast R1, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Particle Count
Riffle Pool Total
Reach Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
6
35
41
41
41
SPO
Very fine
0.062
0.125
41
Fine 0.125 0.250 2 6 8 8
49
Medium 0.25 0.50 3 3 3
52
Coarse 0.5 1.0 1 1 1
53
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0
53
4WV
GAP
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
1
1
1
54
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 2 1 3 3
57
Fine 4.0 5.6 1 1 2 2
59
Fine 5.6 8.0 1 1 2 2
61
Medium 8.0 11.0 1 1 1
62
Medium 11.0 16.0
62
Coarse 16.0 22.6 1 1 1
63
Coarse 22.6 32 2 2 2
65
Very Coarse 32 45 3 3 3
68
Very Coarse 45 64 7 7 7
75
`p6
Small
64
90
11
70
11
11
86
Small 90 128 6 6 6
92
Large 128 180 5 1 6 6
98
Large 180 256 2 2 2
100
�p
Small
256
362
aJ
60
100
Small 362 512
100
Medium 512 1024
100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048
100
BEDROCK
113edrock
2048 1
>2048 1
1 1
1
50
100
Total 1
50
1 50 1
100 1
100
100
Southeast 111, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90 Silt/Clay Sand avel
Cobble er
80 Bedrock
70
60
3 50
E
u 40
�.
y 30
U
a 20
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
MYO-02/2013 MYl-04/2014 - MY2-03/2015 MY3-03/2016 MY4-06/2017
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
Silt/Clay
D35 =
Silt/Clay
D50 =
0.3
D84 =
84.6
D95 =
151.8
D100 =
256.0
Southeast 111, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90 Silt/Clay Sand avel
Cobble er
80 Bedrock
70
60
3 50
E
u 40
�.
y 30
U
a 20
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
MYO-02/2013 MYl-04/2014 - MY2-03/2015 MY3-03/2016 MY4-06/2017
Southeast R1, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
aJ
60
a
a
50
40
v
m
30
20
10
0
O• O•
Particle Class Size (mm)
0 MYO-02/2013
0 MYl-04/2014 MY2-03/2015 0 MY3-03/2016
0 MY4-06/2017

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Southeast R1, Cross Section 12
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Riffle 100-
Count
Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
26
27
27
SPO
Very fine
0.062
0.125
27
Fine 0.125 0.250
27
Medium 0.25 0.50
27
Coarse 0.5 1.0
27
Very Coarse 1 1.0 2.0
27
o4y '
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
27
Very Fine 2.8 4.0
27
Fine 4.0 5.6 2 2
29
Fine 5.6 8.0 2 2
31
Medium 8.0 11.0
31
Medium 11.0 16.0 2 2
33
Coarse 16.0 22.6 4 4
37
Coarse 22.6 32 4 4
41
Very Coarse 32 45 6 6
47
Very Coarse 45 64 8 8
55
Small
64
90
18
18
73
Small 90 128 12 12
86
Large 128 180 10 10
96
Large 180 256 4 4
1 100
JPO
�p
Small
256
362
60
100
Small 362 512
100
Medium 512 1024
100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048
100
BEDROCK
JBedrock
2048 1
>2048 1
a
50
100
Totall
98
100
100
Southeast 111, Cross Section 12
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90 SilUClay and avel
le er
gp Bedro
70
60
50
E
40
y 30
u
CL 20
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
MYO-02/2013 --*- MY1-04/2014 -w- MY2-03/2015 ---*- MY3-03/2016 MY4-06/2017
Cross Section 12
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
Silt/Clay
D35 =
19.51
D50 =
51.4
D84 =
121.8
D95 =
174.6
D100 =
256.0
Southeast 111, Cross Section 12
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90 SilUClay and avel
le er
gp Bedro
70
60
50
E
40
y 30
u
CL 20
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
MYO-02/2013 --*- MY1-04/2014 -w- MY2-03/2015 ---*- MY3-03/2016 MY4-06/2017
Southeast 111, Cross Section 12
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
a
60
v
a
50
V)
th
40
U
R
3
30
20
�a
E
10
0
�O �'�• o•
�ti' 'y ti
ti "� 5 ,y0 ,ti0
�O
Particle Class Size (mm)
■ MYO-02/2013
0 MYl-04/2014 ■ MY2-03/2015 0 MY3-03/2016
0 MY4-06/2017

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Southeast R2&3, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Particle Count
Riffle Pool Total
Reach Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
3
19
22
22
22
SPO
Very fine
0.062
0.125
100
22
Fine 0.125 0.250 2 2 2
24
Medium 0.25 0.50 2 2 2
26
Coarse 0.5 1.0 1 2 3 3
29
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0
29
4WV
GAP
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
1
1
2
2
31
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 3 2 5 5
36
Fine 4.0 5.6 2 2 4 4
40
Fine 5.6 8.0 4 4 4
44
Medium 8.0 11.0 2 2 4 4
48
Medium 11.0 16.0 1 2 3 3
50
Coarse 16.0 22.6 2 3 5 5
55
Coarse 22.6 32 5 1 6 6
61
Very Coarse 32 45 4 1 5 5
66
Very Coarse 45 64 4 2 6 6
72
`06
Small
64
90
8
2
10
10
82
Small 90 128 7 7 7
89
Large 128 180 3 2 5 5
94
Large 180 256 4 1 5 5
99
�p
Small
256
362
1
1
1
100
Small 362 512
100
Medium 512 1024
100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048
100
BEDROCK
113edrock
1 2048 1
>2048 1
1 1
1
100
a
Total 1
53
1 48 1
101 1
100
100
Southeast R2&3, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90 Silt/Clay Sand avel
le gp Bedrock
70
60
3 50
E
u 40
y 30
U
a 20
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
MYO-02/2013 MYl-04/2014 MY2-03/2015 MY3-03/2016 MY4-06/2017
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
Silt/Clay
D35 =
3.82
D50 =
15.0
D84 =
98.7
D95 =J
192.5
D100 =
1 362.0
Southeast R2&3, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90 Silt/Clay Sand avel
le gp Bedrock
70
60
3 50
E
u 40
y 30
U
a 20
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
MYO-02/2013 MYl-04/2014 MY2-03/2015 MY3-03/2016 MY4-06/2017
Southeast R2&3, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
aJ
60
a
a
50
12
40
v
m
30
20
10
0
ooti y,1h
O• O•
old oh
'y 'L ,ti42 �
�� 42 titi do �,L�O 3� �h off` �O �,L42 ��O
��� roti �titi tio�� tio��
�000
Particle Class Size (mm)
0 MYO-02/2013
MYl-04/2014
MY2-03/2015 0 MY3-03/2016
0 MY4-06/2017

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Southeast R2&3, Cross Section 15
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Riffle 100-
Count
Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
10
9
9
D95 =
Very fine
0.062
0.125
k. r
9
SQC��
Fine
0.125
0.250
9
Medium 0.25 0.50
9
Coarse 0.5 1.0
9
Very Coarse 1 1.0 2.0
9
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
9
Very Fine 2.8 4.0
9
Fine 4.0 5.6
9
Fine 5.6 8.0 4 3
12
Medium 8.0 11.0 14 12
24
Medium
11.0
16.0
10
9
33
Coarse 16.0 22.6 4 3
36
Coarse 22.6 32 18 16
52
Very Coarse 32 45 20 17
69
Very Coarse 45 64 2 2
71
Small
64
90
4
3
74
Small 90 128 18 16
90
Large28 180 10 9
98
Large 180 256 2 2
100
JPO
�p
Small
256
362
100
Small 362 512
100
Medium 512 1024
100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048
100
BEDROCK
113edrock
1 2048 1
>2048 1
100
Total 1
116
100
100
Southeast R2&3, Cross Section 15
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90 Silt/Clay and avel
Qqhble er
80 Bedro
70
4 60
50
E
U? 40
4,
y 30
U
a 20
447
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--0- MYO-02/2013 MYl-04/2014 MY2-03/2015 -0- MY3-03/2016 --- 8- MY4-06/2017
100
90
80
70
a,
60
Q)
a 50
V)
40
v
m 30
3
20
10
9
Southeast R2&3, Cross Section 15
Individual Class Percent
Cross Section 15
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
8.87
D35 =
20.03
D50 =
30.8
D84 =
112.6
D95 =
158.1
D100 =
256.0
Southeast R2&3, Cross Section 15
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90 Silt/Clay and avel
Qqhble er
80 Bedro
70
4 60
50
E
U? 40
4,
y 30
U
a 20
447
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--0- MYO-02/2013 MYl-04/2014 MY2-03/2015 -0- MY3-03/2016 --- 8- MY4-06/2017
100
90
80
70
a,
60
Q)
a 50
V)
40
v
m 30
3
20
10
9
Southeast R2&3, Cross Section 15
Individual Class Percent
Doti �ti� otic o`' ti ti �� o h� titi do ��� ,;v t5 0°- Co
p• p• 'y ti �
Particle Class Size (mm)
MYO-02/2013 MYl-04/2014 0 MY2-03/2015 0 MY3-03/2016 0 MY4-06/2017
L Am
k. r
Doti �ti� otic o`' ti ti �� o h� titi do ��� ,;v t5 0°- Co
p• p• 'y ti �
Particle Class Size (mm)
MYO-02/2013 MYl-04/2014 0 MY2-03/2015 0 MY3-03/2016 0 MY4-06/2017

APPENDIX 5. Hydrology Summary Data

Table 13. Verification of Bankfull Events
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 4 - 2017
Reach
Date of Data Date of
Collection Occurrence
Method
Byrds Creek
10/24/2017 4/25/2017
Crest Gage/
Pressure
Transducer
10/24/2017 5/25/2017
10/24/2017 6/20/2017
South Branch
4/3/2017 1/23/2017
10/24/2017 4/25/2017
Southeast Branch
4/3/2017 1/10/2017
4/3/2017 3/15/2017
4/3/2017 3/17/2017