20120730 Ver 1_Year 5 Monitoring Report 2017_20180201

601 North II
Stream Restoration Site
FINAL
Annual Monitoring Report
NCDMS Project Number: 95025
Monitoring Contract Number: 003991
Prepared By:
Resource Environmental Solutions
pre
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605
Submitted to:
NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699

fires
February 1, 2018
Matthew Reid
NC DEQ Division of Mitigation Services
5 Ravenscroft Drive, Suite 102
Asheville, NC 28801
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Corporate Headquarters
5020 Montrose Blvd. Suite 650
Houston, TX 77006
Main: 713.520.5400
RE: 601 North II Stream Restoration Site: MY5 Monitoring Report (NCDMS ID 95025)
Listed below are comments provided by DMS on January 16, 2018 regarding the 601 North II
Stream Restoration Site: Year 5 Monitoring Report and RES' responses.
General:
601NII is scheduled to close out in 2018. Please solve encroachment issues and treat invasives
as necessary to prevent any possible contingency items.
As RES has done in the past, please include a response to the comment letter and how/where
the comments were addressed. Please insert this letter directly behind the cover page in the
final deliverables including the electronic deliverable. The IRT has requested that we include
this letter with the final deliverables. The response letter will need to be included with all future
monitoring deliverables.
Executive Summary:
An encroachment is discussed on Reach 4 between sta: 0+00 and 1+50. This encroachment
has occurred more than once during the life of the project. No solution or corrective measure is
discussed regarding the encroachment. What has RES done to prevent further encroachment?
Please update section to discuss corrective measure. If the encroachment cannot be resolved,
please inform DMS for assistance. Please be aware that historic encroachments may prevent
the project from being accepted by stewardship thereby preventing closeout.
RES plans to lock the gate that is being used to access the easement. Then RES will install a
new gate outside the of easement to allow the farmer access to the other field without having to
cut through the easement.
Table 2:
Please add beaver dam removal from early 2016 to Table 2.
Beavers were removed in May 2017, and water is freely flowing through the remnant beaver
dams. The gap in the beaver dams, however, needs to be widened to a typical cross section
dimension. This will be done in early 2018. The report has been corrected and this has been
added to Table 2.
res. us

0
Table 7:
Plot numbers 8 and 12 are meeting the MY5 success criteria. Suggest editing these two plot
rows to match other plots (green fill and Yes for criteria met).
Done.
Cross Sections and Table 11:
The IRT has expressed concern with having a BHR of 1.0 for all monitoring years. The IRT has
requested that Bank Height Ratios be calculated. Please calculate BHR for cross sections and
update Table 11. If BHR has been calculated, consider increasing the significant digits to show
changes throughout monitoring years (example: 1.06). Also, be prepared to discuss with the IRT
how RES calculates BHR at the Credit Release meeting.
BHR for MY5 riffle cross sections has been calculated using the bankfull elevation from
baseline. This method was used because the dimension of the channels has not changed
enough to alter the bankfull elevation. BHR from previous years was not calculated therefore it
is not included. This has been added to the report and as a footnote to Table 11 a.

601 North II
Stream Restoration Site
2017 Monitoring Report (MY5)
Table of Contents
1.0 Executive Summary/Project Abstract...................................................................................... 1
2.0 Methodology............................................................................................................................ 2
3.0 References................................................................................................................................3
it

Appendices
Appendix A. Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Figure 1. Vicinity Map and Directions
Table 1. Project Components and Component Summations
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts
Table 4. Project Attributes
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2. Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Figure 3. Permanent Photo Station Photos
Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Figure 4. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
Appendix D. Stream Geomorphology Data
Figure 5. Cross -Section Plots with Annual Overlays and Photos
Figure 6. Longitudinal Profile with Annual Overlays
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table l la. Baseline Morphology & Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Table l lb. Monitoring Data — Stream Reach Data Summary
Table 12. Pebble Count Data Summary
Figure 7. MY5 Stream Reach Substrate Composition Charts
Appendix E. Hydrology Data
Table 13. Verification of Bankfull Events
Chart 7. Daily Precipitation Data for Monroe, NC
Table 14. Monroe, NC Rainfall Summary 2017

1.0 Executive Summary/Project Abstract
The goals and objectives stated in the 601 North II Restoration Plan (EBX 2013) are as follows:
Project Goals
• Re-establish the capacity to store and transport watershed flows and sediment loads by restoring
stable dimension, pattern, and profile
• Reduce sediment within on-site and downstream receiving waters through the stabilization of
eroding stream banks, introduction of livestock exclusion fencing and responsible grazing
techniques, and restoration of a forested riparian buffer
• Elevate the water table and introduce surface water flood hydrodynamics within the floodplain by
re-establishing characteristic bankfull dimensions and flood frequency
• Remove non -point sources of pollution associated with pesticides, herbicides, fertilizer, and
livestock waste by filtering sheet flow through a restored riparian buffer and installed Riparian
Best Management Practice (RBMP) detention devices
• Improve aquatic habitat by reducing sedimentation, removing in -stream culverts, enhancing
stream bed variability, and introducing shading, woody debris, and detritus from riparian planting
• Enhance terrestrial wildlife habitat by extending a terrestrial wildlife corridor and refuge to
connect with the existing and adjacent 601 North Site, as well as to the downstream reaches of
Wicker Branch and Lanes Creek
• Improve water quality for two populations of freshwater mussels documented to occur in Lanes
Creek (Savannah Lilliput (Toxolasma pullus) and Carolina creekshell (Villosa vaughniana), both
state listed and Federal Species of Concern
• Expand on and integrate the restoration and enhancement work with the adjacently positioned,
companion 601 North Restoration Site
Project Objectives
• Restoration (Priority 1 and 2) of approximately 3,354 linear feet of perennial stream channel
(3,169 linear feet of credited stream) to reconnect the floodplain and restore stable channel
dimension, pattern, and profile
• Enhancement (Level I) of approximately 225 linear feet of perennial stream channel by
stream bank grading, and slight adjustments to either stream pattern or dimension
• Enhancement (Level II) of approximately 615 linear feet of perennial stream channel by
restoring a minimum 50 foot planted buffer
• Removal of an existing culvert on Wicker Branch
• Installation of Riparian Best Management Practice (RBMP) detention devices, and livestock
exclusion fencing to prohibit grazing on the floodplain and hoof shear on stream banks
• Re -vegetating floodplains adjacent to streams
• Providing a permanent conservation easement on approximately 12.3 acres of riparian buffer
along approximately 4,194 feet of restored and enhanced stream channels
The following presents the results from data collection performed during the Year 5 monitoring period
(MY5). Data was collected between January and November of 2017.
Visual assessment of the easement indicates that herbaceous vegetation has become well established
throughout the project. Limited areas of poor growth rates were noted during MY5 (Figure 2). These
areas were greatly reduced in comparison to MY4. During MY5, a previously identified easement
encroachment was observed on Reach 4, between station 0+00 and 1+50 on the LDB. This area consists
601 North II Stream Restoration Site 1 RES
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

of clearing a path along the fence line using mowing and the application of herbicides. RES plans to lock
the gate that is being used to access the easement. Then RES will install a new gate outside of the
easement to allow the farmer access to the other field without having to cut through the easement.
Invasive exotic vegetation (Chinese privet) was noted in two locations totaling 0.26 acres, or 2% of the
easement area (Figure 2 and Table 6). Previously noted areas of invasive exotic vegetation that was
comprised of Japanese honeysuckle was not included in MY5 as the vine was not hindering the growth of
any of the planted stems. The Chinese privet will be treated during the upcoming growing season.
The MY5 vegetation plot data was collected during October 2017. All monitoring plots met the Year 5
success criteria of 260 stems per acre. Stem densities ranged from 283 to 647 stems per acre with an
annual mean of 401 stems per acre (Table 7). A total of 12 plant species were documented within the
vegetation monitoring plots. When volunteer stems are included, densities ranged from 405 to 971 stems
per acre with a mean of 587 stems per acre across all plots (Table 9).
Visual assessment of the entire project indicates that the stream is stable. Areas of bank erosion noted in
previous years were not included in MY5 as the vegetation on the banks along all reaches have become
well established. Beavers were removed in May 2017, and water is freely flowing through the remnant
beaver dams (Figure 2). The gap in the beaver dams, however, needs to be widened to a typical cross
section dimension. This will be done in early 2018.
A field visit was conducted in the end of November 2017 to collect stream morphological data. Stream
longitudinal profiles, in general, have remained stable from MY4 to MY5 (Figure 6 and Table llb).
MY5 cross-section data also showed little change between MY4 and MY5 (Figure 5 and Table lla).
BHR for MY5 riffle cross sections has been calculated using the bankfull elevation from baseline. This
method was used because the dimension of the channels has not changed enough to alter the bankfull
elevation. Pebble counts were conducted at all 10 cross-sections and continue to display removal of fine
sediment in the channel, resulting in a larger, more course stream bed substrate (Table 12; Figure 7).
Bankfull events were documented on Reach 2 and Reach 5 in the form of wrack lines (Table 13). Both
reaches have recorded multiple bankfull events throughout the monitoring period.
Summary information and data related to the occurrence of items such as easement encroachment and
statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and
figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in
these reports can be found in the restoration plan on NCDMS's website. All raw data supporting tables
and figures in the appendices are available from NCDMS upon request.
2.0 Methodology
Visual assessment of the stream was performed at the beginning and end of the monitoring year.
Permanent photo station photos were collected during the initial visual assessment during leaf -off
conditions to ensure visibility of in -channel structures and stream banks. Additional photos of vegetation
or stream problem areas were documented with photographs throughout the project area.
Geomorphic measurements were taken using standard guidance (Rosgen 1996; USACE 2003) during low
flow conditions using a Topcon GTS -312 Total Station. Three-dimensional coordinates associated with
cross-section and profile data were collected in the field and geo-referenced (NAD83 State Plane feet
FIPS 3200). Morphological data was limited to 10 cross-sections. Survey data was imported into CAD,
601 North II Stream Restoration Site 2 RES
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

ArcGIS, and Excel for data processing and analysis. Channel substrate was characterized using
Wolman Pebble Count outlined in the Harrelson et al. (1994) and processed using Microsoft Excel.
Vegetation success is being monitored using 12 permanent monitoring plots. Vegetation monitoring
follows the CVS-EEP Level 1 Protocol for MY1 and will follow Level 2 Protocol for monitoring years 2-
5 for Recording Vegetation, version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes analysis of composition and
density of planted species. Data is processed using the CVS data entry tool. In the field, the four corners
of each plot were permanently marked with rebar and photos of each plot are taken from the origin each
monitoring year.
Precipitation data was reported from the NCCRONOS station number 315771 two miles South East of
Monroe, NC. Two crest gauges were installed—one on the mainstem Reach 2 at XS -10, and the other on
Reach 5 at XS -3. During quarterly visits to the site, the height of the corkline was recorded and cross-
referenced with known bankfull elevations at each crest gauge.
3.0 References
Harrelson, Cheryl, C. Rawlins and J. Potyondy. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated
Guide to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM -245. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment
Station. USDA Forest Service. Fort Collins, Colorado
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation. Version 4.2. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of
Biology.
EBX (Environmental Banc and Exchange). 2013. 601 North II Restoration Site Baseline Monitoring
Document and As -Build Baseline Report. NCEEP Project No. 95025/Contract No. 003991.
Raleigh.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology Books, Pagosa Springs, Colorado.
USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources -Division of
Water Quality. Wilmington District.
601 North II Stream Restoration Site 3 RES
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix A
Project Background History and Maps
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts
Table 4. Project Information and Attributes

QJ
�. Driving Directions: From Monroe drive south on Hwy. 601.
Turn right on McManus Circle at the southern intersection aJ,
with Hwy. 601. Site is on left and is accessed by a farm • o,
6path located on the west side of McManus Circle just
before the road ends.
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site
of the NCDEQ DMS and is encompassed by a recorded jp0 °�
conservation easement, but is bordered by land under? o
private ownership. Accessing the site may require ` �¢a ° 6-
traversing areas near or along the easment boundary and art d �° F�cn
therefore access by the general public is not permitted. P":
Access by authorized personel of state and federalst �kWhspri. Y
agencies or their designee/contractors involved in the "` ; ,
development, oversight, and stewardship of the restoration �� °cF
site is permitted within the terms and timeframes of their 109 • • �'� 6'
defined role. Any intended site visitation or activity by any
person outside of these previously sanctioned roles and
activities requires prior coordination with DMS.
�JJ ° a.»
Troy Medlin
601 North II
• I \ Mitigation Site a
650 N
97
e�etz R
11
—
O'
170
\
/ � 0 •— — \ 'X66 \ \
s�
O o
650
Streams
Roads
?Q56
` Mitigation Sites
tel. 7e
0 Water Bodies
I County Boundary �_ u
�` Q � J ' 1," a eVL - '` Sot• •'
L
vigure 'i
601 North II Mitigation Site
Project Vicinity Map
0 0.25 0.5 1
Miles
Union County

Appendix A — Project Background History and Maps
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
`Includes 169 feet of hydrologic connectivity through a linear wetland persisting in the location of the relic channel.
2Does not include the restored portion of Wicker Branch located outside of the conservation easement (Station 11+63-12+25).
3Does not include the restored portion of Wicker Branch located outside of the conservation easement (Station 25+85-27+08).
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
601 North II Stream Restoration Site — Project No. 95025
Mitigation Credits
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non -riparian Wetland
Buffer
Nitrogen
Nutrient Offset
Phosphorous Nutrient
Offset
Type R RE
Totals 3,169 396
Project Components
Project Component -or-
Reach ID
Stationing Location
Existing
Footage Approach Restoration -or- Restoration Equivalent
Restoration Footage
Mitigation
Ratio
Wicker Branch (Reach 1)
00+00-06+60
630' Pi Restoration
660
1:01
Wicker Branch (Reach 2)
06+60-24+35
1,356 Pl, P2 Restoration
1,7132
1:01
Wicker Branch (Reach 3)
24+35-27+08
414 P2 Restoration
1503
1:01
UT to Wicker Branch (Reach 4)
00+00-02+25
218 EI Restoration Equivalent
225
01:01.5
02+25-08+40 608 EII Restoration Equivalent 615
01:02.5
UT to Wicker Branch (Reach 5)
08+40-14+86
534 Pi Restoration
646
1:01
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Stream
(linear feet)
Riparian Wetland Non -riparian Wetland Buffer
(acres) (acres) (square feet)
Upland
(acres)
Riverine Non-Riverine
Restoration
3,169
12.3
Enhancement 1 225
Enhancement II 615
BMP Elements
Element
Location
Purpose/Function
Notes
Veinal Pools
12prior
See as -built plans
Treat on-site storm water from adjacent agricultural fields. Remove suspended solids, help infiltration of water and remove excess nutrients
to entering stream. Will reduce livestock waste in on-site streams
Target at base of drainages coming from adjacent
agricultural fields.
Farm Crossing
Improvements
See as -built plans
Two off-site farm crossings located above the restored streams will be improved at their existing location and incorporated into the
restoration design.
Cattle Exclusion
Fencing
Along the western site
boundary
Will eliminate hoof shear on banks and livestock waste into on-site streams
To be installed in 2013
`Includes 169 feet of hydrologic connectivity through a linear wetland persisting in the location of the relic channel.
2Does not include the restored portion of Wicker Branch located outside of the conservation easement (Station 11+63-12+25).
3Does not include the restored portion of Wicker Branch located outside of the conservation easement (Station 25+85-27+08).

Appendix A — Project Background History and Maps
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
601 North II Stream Restoration Site - Project No. 95025
Activity Report
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or Delivery
Final Mitigation Plan
N/A
Oct -12
Final Design (90 percent)
N/A
Nov -12
Construction
N/A
Apr -13
Temporary S&E mix applied to entire project area
N/A
Feb -Apr 2013
Permanent seed mix applied to reach/egments
N/A
Apr -13
Bare Root Seedling Installation
N/A
Apr -13
Installation of permanent cross-sections and vegetation plots
N/A
May -13
Baseline Monitoring Report
Jun -13
Jun -13
Year 1 Vegetation Monitoring
Dec -13
Dec -13
Year 1 Stream Monitoring
Nov -13
Dec -13
Beaver Dam Removal
-
Mar -14
Additional Boundary Marking/Signage
-
Apr -14
Year 2 Vegetation Monitoring
Sep -14
Nov -14
Year 2 Stream Monitoring
Jun -14
Nov -14
Supplemental Planting
-
Jan -15
Year 3 Vegetation Monitoring
Sep -15
Nov -15
Year Stream Monitoring
May -15
Nov -15
Year 4 Vegetation Monitoring
Jun -16
Oct -16
Year 4 Stream Monitoring
May -16
Oct -16
Beaver Management
-
May -17
Year 5 Vegetation Monitoring
Oct -17
Feb -18
Year 5 Stream Monitoring
Nov -17
Feb -18
*NA - Activities and reporting history for these items are not applicable to this restoration project

Appendix A — Project Background History and Maps
Table 3. Project Contacts
Table 3. Project Contacts
601 North II Stream Restoration Site — Project No.
95025
Resource Environmental Solutions
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Prime Contractor
Raleigh NC 27605
Phone: [phone]
Contact: Brian Hockett
Atkins North America, Inc.
1616 East Millbrook Road, Suite 310
Designer
Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone]
Contact: Jens Geratz or Michael
Gloden
Wright Contracting
PO Box 545
Construction
Siler City, NC 27344
Contractor
[phone]
Contact: Stephen James
KBS Earthworks
5616 Cable Church Road
Planting Contractor
Julian, NC 27283
[phone]
Contact: Keneth Strader
Kee Mapping and Surveying
PO Box 2566
As -built Surveys
Ashville, NC 28802
Contact: Phillip Kee
Evergreen Seed
Fuquay Varina, NC
Seeding Mix Source
[phone]
Contact: Wistar Taylor
Arbor Gen Super Tree Nursery
Nursery Stock
[phone]
Suppliers
Contact: Polly Creech
Atkins North America, Inc.
Monitoring
1616 East Millbrook Road, Suite 310
Performers (MYO) -
Raleigh, NC 27609
2013
[phone]
Contact: Jim Cooper
Monitoring
Resource Environmental Solutions,
Performers (MYl-
LLC.
MY5)
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
2013-2016
Raleigh NC 27605
Stream Monitoring
Ryan Medric [phone]
POC
Vegetation Monitoring
Ryan Medric [phone]
POC

Appendix A — Project Background History and Maps
Table 4. Project Information and Attributes
Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
601 North H Stream Restoration Site — Project No. 95025
Project Information
Project Name 60l North II Stream Restoration Site
County Union County
Project Area (acres) 12.3
Project Coordinates
(latitude and 34.897274,-80.4734t6
longitude)
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Piedmont
River Basin Yadkin
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit 3040105
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit 3040105081010
DWQ Sub -basin 3/7/2014
Project Drainage Area (acres) 453
Project Drainage Area Percent 'l
Im us Area
CGIA Land Use Classification Cultivated, Managed Herbaceous Cover, Mixed Hardwood
Reach Summary Information
Wicker Branch
Wicker Branch
Wicker Branch U" Ito Wicker Branch
UT Wicker Branch
Parameters
(Reach 1)
(Reach 2)
(Reach 3)
(Reach 4)
(Reach 5)
Length of reach
630
1,356
414
826
534
1'near feet
Valley classification
VIII
VIII
VDI
VDI
VID
Drainage area (acres)
l69
286
365
85
88
NCDWQ stream
23.5
35
35
23
23
identificafion score
NCDWQ Water
WS -V
WS -V
WS -V
WS -V
WS -V
Quality Classification
Morphological
Description(stream
F6
El/Cl
G4
B4
B4
Evolutionary trcud
E -G -F
E -G -C -E
E -G
E -G -B
E -G -B
Underlying d
y' g mappe
Cid channe It loam
ry silt
Cid chance It loam
ry silt
Cid charm It loam Badin
cry)
channery silty clay
Budin channery silty clay
soils
(CmB)
(CmB)
loam
(CmB)
(BdB2), Cid chance
loam (BdB2), Cid chaeta
silt loam (CmB)
silt loam (CmB)
Drainage class
Moderately well drained
Moderately well drained
Moderately well drained BdB2" Well drained, CmB:
BdB2: Well drained, CmB:
Moderately well drained
Moderately well drained
Soil Hydric status
Not hydric
Not hydric
Not hydric
Not hydric
Not hydric
Valley Slope
0.0095
0.0098
0.0165
0.013
0.0124
FEMA classification
Project streams are art located within a FEMA regulated area
Native vegetation
N/A (cultivated land)
N/A (cultivated land) Mesie Mixed Hardwood
N/A (cultivated land)
N/A (cultivated land)
Forest
Percent composition
of exotic invasive
0%
0% 60% (Chinese privet)
0%
0%
vegetation
Wetland Summary Information
Parameters Wetland 1
Size of Wetland 0.05
rrx
Wetland Type Palustrine emergent
Mapped Soil Series Cid chancery silt loam (CmB)
Drainage class Moderately well drained
Soil Hydric Status Not hydric
Source of Hydrology Groundwater
Hydrologic NA
beepturreard
Nafive vegetation N/A (cultivated land)
car
Perrcc t composition
exotic invasive 0%
vegetation
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation Applicable? Resolved?
Documentation
Waters of the United States — Section 404 Yes Yes
1D Notification / NWP27
Waters of the United States — Section 401 Yes Yes
401 Water Quality Certification
Endangered Species ActYes Yes
CE Documentation (Mitigation Plan,
Appendix B)
Historic Preservation Act No N/A
CE Documentation (Mitigation Plan,
Appendix B)
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/ Coastal Area No N/A
N/A
Management Act (CAMA)
FEMA Floodplain Compliance No N/A
FEMA Floodplain Checklist (Mitigation
Plan, Appendix B)
Essential Fisheries Habitat No

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2. Integrated Current Conditions Plan View
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Figure 3. Permanent Photo Station Photos

Encroachment
rzt- —4_
UT to Wicker Branch
Reach�4
3
®2
Chinese Privet �3
4 �..b 5
\ l �
\ %
h
4
�� , Wicker Branch
-.* Reach 1
U_ T to Wicker Branch
Reach
Poor Growth Rate
Wicker Branch
..Reach
fires
W+.
0 100 200
Feet
1 inch = 200 feet
Figure 2
601 North II Stream
Restoration Project
MY5 2017
Current Conditions
Plan View
Date: 12/8/2017 Drawn by: RTM
LEGEND
O Conservation Easement
Photo Stations
® Crest Gauge
Cross Section
— Stream Centerline
— Structures
Breached Beaver Dams
Vegetation Plots
E71 Successful
Riparian Buffer Conditions
Target Community
a Present Mar inal Absent
v
Absent No Fill
CL
y
i Present
N
Common ----

Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
N/A - Item does not apply.
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
601 North II / Project No. 95025 - Wicker Branch Reach 1
Assessed Len th 660 feet
Number
Footage
Adjusted %
Major Channel
Channel
Number
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
with
with
for
Category
Sub -Category
Metric
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Woody
Woody
Woody
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
1. Vertical Stability
flow laterally (not to include point bars).
0
0
100%
2 Degradation - Evidence of downcutting.
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
22
22
100%
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6).
19
19
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
19
19
100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
21
21
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
21
21
100
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
1. Scoured / Eroding
scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
0 0
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
N, A N/A
N/A
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse.
0
0
100%
N/A N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A N/A
N/A
3. Engineered
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
8
H
100%
Structures
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
R
H
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or anus.
9
R
100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT exceed
3. Bank Protection
15%
8
N
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull
4. Habitat
Depth Ratio ?

Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
Table 5 cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
601 North II / Project No. 95025 - Wicker Branch Reach 2
Assessed Length 1,775 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted%
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
I. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Awadation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars).
0
0
100%
2 Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
33
33
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6).
33
33
100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
33
33
100%
1. Thalwegccmeringatupstream ofmeander bend (Run).
33
33
100%
4. Thahveg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
33
33
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply frompoorgrowth
and/or scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving or collapse.
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
13
13
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
13
13
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
13
13
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15%.
13
13
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining- Max Pool Depth: Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio > 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
1313
100%
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.

Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
Table 5 cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
601 North II / Project No. 95025 - Unnamed Tributary - Wicker Branch Reach 3
Assessed Len th 273 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Maradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars).
0
0
100%
2 Degradation - Evidence of downcutting.
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
.5
5
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6).
_
5
100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
_
5
100
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
5
5
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
5
5
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured / Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
N/A
N
N/A
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse.
0
0
100%
N A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
1 N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
2
2
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
2
3
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT exceed
15%
2
3
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining —Max Pool Depth: Mean Bmkfull
Depth Ratio > 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
2
100%
N/A - Item does not apply.

Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
Table 5 cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
601 North II / Project No. 95025 - Unnamed Tributary - Wicker Branch Reach 5
Assessed Len th 646 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Maradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars).
0
0
100%
2 Degradation - Evidence of downcutting.
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
18
18
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth z 1.6).
19
19
100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
19
19
100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
19
19
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
19
19
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured / Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
N/A
N
N/A
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse.
0
0
100%
N A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
1 N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
9
9
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
9
9
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
9
9
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT exceed
15%
9
9
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth: Mean Bmkfull
Depth Ratio > 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
9
9
100%
N/A - Item does not apply.

Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
N/A - Item does not apply.
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
601 North II / Project No. 95025
Planted Acreage 12.3
% of
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Number of
Combined
Planted
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
1. Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.
N/A
0
0.00
0%
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4,
2. Low Stem Density Areas
or 5 stem count criteria.
N/A
0
0.00
0%
Totals
0
0.00
0%
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
Vertical Lines
Yellow Vert
0.64
5%
Cumulative Totals --42
2
0.64
1 5%
Easement Acreage 12.3
% of
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Number of
Combined
Easement
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
Horizontal Lines
2
0.26
2%
Red - Dense/Yellow - Present
5. Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
Red Vertical Lines
1
0.06
0%
N/A - Item does not apply.

Tributary to Wicker Branch — Permanent Photo Station 2
Downstream
November 30, 2017
Tributary to Wicker Branch — Permanent Photo Station 3
Upstream
November 28, 2017
al Assessment Data

Tributary to Wicker Branch — Permanent Photo Station 3
Downstream
November 28, 2017
Wicker Branch — Permanent Photo Station 4
Downstream
November 29, 2017
al Assessment Data

Wicker Branch — Permanent Photo Station 5
Upstream
November 28, 2017
Wicker Branch — Permanent Photo Station 5
Downstream
November 28, 2017
al Assessment Data

Wicker Branch — Permanent Photo Station 6
Upstream
November 29, 2017
Wicker Branch — Permanent Photo Station 6
Downstream
November 29, 2017
al Assessment Data

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Figure 4. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)

Appendix C — Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
601 North II / Project No. 95025
Plot #
Planted
Stems/Acre
Volunteer
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Survival
Criteria
Met?
Average
Tree
Height
cm
1
405
0
405
Yes
377
2
324
121
445
Yes
559
3
445
162
607
Yes
406
4
445
81
526
Yes
300
5
647
81
728
Yes
505
6
607
121
728
Yes
461
7
405
121
526
Yes
471
8
283
121
405
Yes,
199
9
324
243
567
Yes
464
10
324
202
526
Yes
464
11
324
647
971
Yes
288
12
283
324
607
Yes
236
Project Avg
401
185
587
Yes
394

i
1
f � f
Y� I

r
z
r
MCI
K,
� v
..� �.,-r
a-
rS .'
r
z
r
.a
MCI
K,
� v
..� �.,-r
..ice �"1 , '•,.
.a
MCI
K,
ti r,

J',iari' � rti ti
i ?
i� - • s .�'a�/� r ��5.� �..�i � . � I � i. -., .�.- �s .tea 16e�iX �'�Ga
�
sW
•.
+his
f :. �1e :

;�
,�� � }fit„ �� � �,,� ,
� �,,
kyr -,_
�•�� � ,�, k � :�
. �'
'� \ �
S \
9 � r�4:,.. '� ��_ .`
� � ' n �. L �-' � e ``
i..: '� '�
�� 9
q} �v�
`/ �� ;,� ', gam!` � � �a�,�� 1��
1 '� �

Appendix C — Vegetation Plot Data
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 8: CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
601 North II Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Report Prepared By
Eric Teitsworth
Date Prepared
10/20/201715:44
database name
601_N—II_MY5_2017.mdb
database location
C:\Users\eteitsworth\Dropbox (RES)\@RES Projects\North
Carolina\601 North II\Monitoring\Monitoring
Data\MY5 2017\Vegetation Data
computer name
D4VOKGH2
file s ize
47288320
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a
summary of project(s) and project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each
year. This excludes live stakes.
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year.
This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all
natural/volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems,
dead stems, missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences
and percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for
each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted
and natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing
stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code
95925
project Name
601 North II Stream Restoration Site
Description
Stream Restoration Site
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
le ngth(ft)
4248
stream -to -edge width (ft)
350
area (sq m)
47348.22
Required Plots (calculated)
12
Sampled Plots
12

Appendix C — Vegetation Plot Data
Table 9. Planted Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot)
'PnoLS: No livestakes included in tally; P -all: All planted stems included in tally; T: Total stems including recruitment.
Table 9. Planted Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot)
601NII Stream Restoration Site
Current Plot Data (MY5 2017)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
Plot 1
Plot 2
Plot 3
Plot 4
Plot 5
Plot 6
Plot 7
Plot 8
Plot 9
Plot 10
Plot 11
Plot 12
PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
1 1
1
3 3
3 2
2
3
1 l 2
4 4
4
4 4 5
2 2
2
3 3
3
3 3
4
4 4
4
2 2
2
Campsis radicans
Trumpet Creeper
Vine
Cehis laevigata
Sugarberry
Tree
Celtis occidentalis
Common Hackberry
Tree
Cercis canadensis
Eastern Redbud
Tree
1
1
11
2 2 21
2 21
2
1
1
11 1
11
1
1 1
1
Diospyros virginiana
Common Persimmon Tree
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Tree
1 1
1
1 1
1
1
1
2 2 3
2 2 2
1 1
3
2 2
3
1
1
2 2
2
Liquidambar styraciflua
Sweetgum
Tree
31
1
1
2
141
3
Nyssa sylvatica
Blackgum
Tree
1
1 1
1
Platanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
Tree
l 1 1
1
41 4
5 2
2
21
11
5 51
5
1
5 5 5
1
1 2 2
3
1
2 2
2
Platanus occidentalis var.
i Sycamore, Plane -tree Tree
1 1
1
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oah
Tree
3 3
3
1 11
1 3
3
5
6 6 6
4 4
4
3 3 3
1 1
1
1 11
21
1
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Tree
1 1
1
1
2 2 2
5 5 6
2 21 2
2 2
2
2 2
3
4 41
4
Quercus rubra
Northern Red Oak
Tree
1 1
1
1
1
1
l 1
1
1 1 l410
1
1 1
1
I 1
l
Quercus velutina
Black Oak
Tree
1 1
1
Salix nigra
Black Willow
Tree
j
2
4
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
1
1
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
10 10 10
8 8 11
11 11 15
11 11 13
16 16 18
15 15 18
13
71 71 10
81 81 14
81 81 13
81 81 24
71 7 15
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
81 81 81 31 31 51 71 7 8 41 41 51 51 51 71 51 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 6 4 4 7 5 5 6 2 2 5 4 4 7
405 405 405 324 324 445 445 445,6071 445 445 526 647 647 728 607 607 728 405 405 526 2831 28314051 3241 32415671 3241 32415261 3241 32419711 283 28-31607
'PnoLS: No livestakes included in tally; P -all: All planted stems included in tally; T: Total stems including recruitment.

Appendix C — Vegetation Plot Data
Table 9 con't. Planted Total Stem Counts (Annual Means)
TnoLS: No livestakes included in tally; P -all: All planted stems included in tally; T: Total stems including recruitment.
Table 9 Con't. Planted Total Stem Count (Annual Means)
601NII Stream Restoration Site
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
MY5 (2017)
PnoLS P -all T
MY4 (2016) MY3 (2015)
PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T
MY2 (2014)
PnoLS P -all T
MY1 (2013)
PnoLS P -all T
MYO (2013)
PnoLS P -all T
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
29
29
33
29
29
35
29
29
29
29
29
29
31
31
31
51
51
51
Campsis radicans
Trumpet Creeper
Vine
2
Celtis laevigata
Sugarberry
Tree
4
Celtis occidentalis
Common Hackberry
Tree
2
Cercis canadensis
Eastern Redbud
Tree
7
7
7
7
7
7
8
8
8
7
7
7
11
11
11
19
191
19
Diospyros virginiana
Common Persimmon
Tree
6
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Tree
11
11
18
11
11
20
11
11
15
10
10
14
9
9
9
10
10
10
Liquidambar styraciflua
Sweetgum
Tree
24
35
2
10
Nyssa sylvatica
Blackgum
Tree
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
7
7
7
Platanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
Tree
21
21
25
21
21
21
21
21
26
21
21
21
22
22
22
19
19
19
Platanus occidentalis var. oi Sycamore, Plane -tree
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
6
2
2
2
2
2
8
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Tree
22
22
26
23
23
25
23
23
23
23
23
23
31
31
31
44
44
44
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Tree
18
18
21
18
18
201
17
17
17
18
18
18
19
19
19
27
27
27
Quercus rubra
Northern Red Oak
Tree
7
7
7
11
11
11
11
11
111
9
9
9
13
13
13
14
14
14
Quercus velutina
Black Oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Salix nigra
Black Willow
Tree
1
6
10
3
3
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
1 1
2
2
Stem count
1191
1191
174
1241
124
202
124
124 138
121
121
146
1391
1391139,
1911
191
195
size (ares)
12
12
12
12
12
12
size (ACRES)
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
Species count
101
10
131
101
10
15
10
10
12
101
101
13
81
81
8
81
81
9
Stems per ACRE
4011
40115871
418
418
681
418
4181,465's
4081
40814921
4691
469
469
6441
644
658
TnoLS: No livestakes included in tally; P -all: All planted stems included in tally; T: Total stems including recruitment.

Appendix D
Stream Geomorphology Data
Figure 5. Cross -Section Plots with Annual Overlays and Photos
Figure 6. Longitudinal Profile with Annual Overlays
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 11 a. Baseline Morphology & Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Table 11b. Monitoring Data — Stream Reach Data Summary
Table 12. Pebble Count Data Summary
Figure 7. MY5 Stream Reach Substrate Composition Charts

Figure 5. Cross Section Plots and Photos
Cross Section 1
Upstream
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Downstream
601 North II - Reach 4 - CrOSS Section 1 - Riffle
620.5-
620
619.5 PF
619
618.5
Basedon fisedbaseline bankfull elevation
618
MY1
c 617.5
s
MY3
-
MY5
616.56.5
616.5
616
616.5
615.5
616.5
615
Banktull Width (ft)
614.5
614
8.3
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Distance (R)
Baseline Year Year2 Year3 YearA Year5 - - -App-x Bankfull
7.9
Cross Sect, n 1 Rl�e
Basedon fisedbaseline bankfull elevation
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (iLiturn) ms ed
616.5
616.5
616.5
616.5
616.5
616.5
Banktull Width (ft)
8.9
8.3
8.0
8.6
7.9
6.3
Flood nine Width (ft)
23.1
X23
X23
=23
X23
27.4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
Banldull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
0.7
0.8
().8
0.9
l.a
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ($`)
4.2
4.1
3.9
3.9
4.6
2.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
18.5
16.9
16.4
19.6
15.6
14.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
2.6
X2.8
X2.9
X2.7
X2.9
4.3
BankFnll Bank Heigh t Ratio
1.0
1.6
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0

Cross Section 2
Upstream
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Downstream
601 North it • Reach 5 • Cross Section 2 • Pool
607
606.5
60s
605.5
fi05
_ 604.5
c 604-111111116-
Q
/J
w 603.5
603
602.5
602
601.5
601
600.5
0
5 10 15 26 25
30
35 46
Distance (it)
45 50
55 60
65 70
Baseline -Year1 Year2
Year3
Year4
Years --AApp.x.Bank%ll
Cinoss Section 2(Pool)
Based on fixedbaseline bankfull eleratiou
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
LMY5
Record elevation(daturn) used
604.0
604.0
604.0
604.0
604.0
604.0
BankFull Width (ft)
17.6
15.4
17.1
18.6
17.6
16.5
Flood rone Width (ft)
(vl.l
X100
X100
X100
X100
•68,3
Bankfiull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
0.9
1.0
0.9
0.9
0.8
Bankfall Max Depth (ft)
1.7
1.8
2.1
2.2
2.2
2.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
12.8
13.6
16.4
16.7
16.0
17.8
Ban kfull Width/De th Raba
24.5
17.5
17.8
20.8
19.2
16.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
3.6
X6.5
X5.9
X5.4
a5.7
NIA
Ban kfull Bank Heigh t Ratio 1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
NIA

Cross Section 3
Upstream
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Downstream
.1
F• --___-_-�____.
.1
1
Based on fixed has eIise trdukfuII eIeNation
ter.; ���������r�►�
MYl
MY2
MY3
i�®��i�::�i�r.=..��I®®moi■
MY5
Record elevation (datum) us ed
603.9
603.9
603.9
603.9
603.9
' INNIMENIMMOMMININNIMMEMEMI■
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.0
10.8
10.8
I R-1.100
11.7
Cross Section 3 Riffie
Based on fixed has eIise trdukfuII eIeNation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) us ed
603.9
603.9
603.9
603.9
603.9
603.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.0
10.8
10.8
11.9
11.7
12.4
Flood nine Width (ft)
65.5
>10D
X100
X100
X100
X68.2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
BanlfUUMax Depth (ft)
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.3
1.5
Ban kfullCYoss Sec tion a I A rea (ft2)
8.5
8.5
9.5--T-9,1
8.6
9.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
14.1
14.6
12.3
15,6
14.6
15,9
Ban k£ull Entrenchment Ratio
6.0
�L-9
X9.2
78.4
X8.6
75.5
Bankfu11BankHel ht Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.8

Cross Section 4
Upstream
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Downstream
Cross Section 4 Riffle
Based on fixedbaseline bankfull eleNation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
604.5
604.5
604.5
604.5
604.5
604.5
Banldull Width (ft)
11.4
12.5
12.3
11.0
11.2
12.0
Hoodprone Width (ft)
59.7
>IOD
X100
X100
X100
•65,6
Ban kfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
0.6
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.8
BankfullMax Depth (ft)
1.3
1 1.1
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.5
Ban kfullCross Sec tion alArea(ft 2)
7.9
7.2
8.2
7.5
8.4
9.0
Banldull Width/Depth Ratio
16.6
21.7
18.1
16.1
14.9
16.0
Ban k£ull Entrenchment Ratio
5.2
>8
X8.1
X9.1
X8.9
X5.5
Bankfu 11 Ba n k He ight Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9

Cross Section 5
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Upstream Downstream
Cross Section 5 00l)
Basedow fixedbas elinc baukfull cicNatiau Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Record ele, -ation ([latu[n) use 604.4 604A 604.4 6(k4.4 604.4 6W7 -
Ba n kfu It
{?4.4Banklull Width (R) 14.2 15.4 15.5 16.1 20.0 18.1
Flood rone Width (ft) 65.6 >100 >100 X1(10 X100 68,8
Bandl Mean Depth (ft) 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7
Bankfull MaxI]epth (R) 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.9
Bankfull C7oss Sectional Area (ftp) 11.5 6.1 9.4 11.8 14.1 12.0
Ban kfull WidthlDe th Rat k) 17.6 14.3 19.9 21.9 28.4 27.3
Ban kfullEnt ren chment ltatie, 4.6 X6.5 3b.i 36,2 X5.0 VIA
Ban kfiillBankI-Iei ht kaiic, 1.0 1.0 1.0
1.0 1.0 VIA
1.0 1.0 VIA

Cross Section 6
r 4�
:.gyp,. •�► ��:t.:.+�.��� ..
Upstream
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Downstream
601 North II . Reach 2 • Cross Section 6 • Riffle
599
598.5
598
597.5
597
596.5
596
-- -- -- -- --
----woe--
- -
- - ---
�i
m
595.5
595
594.5
594
593.5
593
0
5 10 15 26 25
30
35 40
Distance (ft)
45 50
55 60
65 76
baseline .-Year1 Year3
Year3 -
Year4 -
Year5 - - -Approx.6ankW.
Cmss Section 6 Rii$e
Based on fitiedbaseline bankfull elleva ion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
596,2
596.2
596.2
596.2
596.2
596.2
Banldull Width (ft)
11.5
113
11.8
11.9
12.7
13.2
Flood rone Width ft)
69.2
X90
X910
n90
X90
X68.8
Ban kfuIl. Mean Depth (ft)
1.1
1.6
1.1
0,9
1.1
1.1
Banldull Max Depth (ft)
1.7
1.7
1.9
1.6
1.8
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (11`)
12.1
12.0
12.9
11.2
13.6
14.2
Ban ldull WidthlDe th Ratio
10.8
11.8
10.8
12.7
11.8
12.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
6.0
77.5
77.6
77.5
X7.1
75.2
Ban kfull Bank Heigh t Ratio
1.0
1.6
1.0
1.0
lA
1.0

Cross Section 7
Upstream
Appendix D - Stream Survey Data
Downstream
599
601 North II -Reach 2 - Cross Section 7 - Pool
599.5
598
597.5
597
596.5
-- -- -- __31111111111L
-_____
-
----___
59fi
595.5
Q 595
5945-
945594
594
593.5
593
592.5
592
591.5
591
0 5 10 15 26 25
30
35 46
Distance (R)
45 50
55 60
65 76
baseline -Year Year2
Year3
YearA
Year5 -- AAPPII.BankWl
Cross Section 7(Pool)
Based on fisedbaseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
596.1
596.1
596.1
591.6
591.6
591.6
Banldull Width (ft)
12.8
12.8
12.9
12.9
12.7
13.8
Flood ronc Width (ft)
69.5
7125
X125
7125
X125
X69
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.0
2.2
2.1
Banldull=Depth (ft)
3.2
3.2
32
3.2
3.3
3.5
BankfullCross Sectional Area (R`)
23.2
24.2
25.5
25,2
27.6
29.1
Ban ldull Width/De th Ratio
7,0
6.8
6.5
6.6
5.8
6.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
5.4
79.8
79.7
79.7
79.9
NIA
Ban kfull Bank Heigh t Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
NIA

Cross Section 8
Upstream
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Downstream
Cross Section 8 Pool
Based on fixed bas eIise baukfuII eIeNation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) us ed
591.3
591.3
591.3
MFr t■������
.: iiiiiiill �►J■iiiii�
591.3
591.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.7
13.3
13.4
13.6
14.1
12.2
Flood nine Width (ft)
69.5
>20D
Cross Section 8 Pool
Based on fixed bas eIise baukfuII eIeNation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) us ed
591.3
591.3
591.3
591.3
591.3
591.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.7
13.3
13.4
13.6
14.1
12.2
Flood nine Width (ft)
69.5
>20D
n200
X200
n200
X69
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.7
1.8
2.0
BanlfUUMax Depth (ft)
2.9
3.1
3.2
3.2
3.3
3.4
Ban kfull CYo s s Sec tion aIArea (ft2)
19.9
22.9
23.5
22.9
25.7
24.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.1
7.8
7.6
8.1
7.8
6.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
5.5
]15
X14.9
714.7
X14.2
NIA
Bankfu11BankHel ht Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
NIA

Cross Section 9
Upstream
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Downstream
Cinoss Section 9(Riffle)
Bascdon fi%ed baseline baakfull ekNatiou
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) use
591.0
591.0
591.0
591.0
591.0
591.0
Banktull Width (ft)
11.6
11.5
11.3
11.1
11.6
1 D.9
Flood rune Width (ft)
69.7
X200
X200
X200
X200
•69.3
Banldull Mean Depth (ft)
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
Ban kfull Max Depth ($)
1.8
1.7
1!1111111111111 111111111 IF
1.7
1.8
1.8
Cinoss Section 9(Riffle)
Bascdon fi%ed baseline baakfull ekNatiou
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) use
591.0
591.0
591.0
591.0
591.0
591.0
Banktull Width (ft)
11.6
11.5
11.3
11.1
11.6
1 D.9
Flood rune Width (ft)
69.7
X200
X200
X200
X200
•69.3
Banldull Mean Depth (ft)
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
Ban kfull Max Depth ($)
1.8
1.7
1.8
1.7
1.8
1.8
Banldull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
13.0
12.3
12.4
11.7
12.E
12.5
Banldull Width/De th Ratio
10.4
10.7
10.2
10.6
10.8
9.5
BankfullFntrenchment Ratio
6.0
X17.5
=17.8
X17.9
X17.2
X6.3
BankfullBank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0

Cross Section 10
Upstream
Appendix D - Stream Survey Data
Downstream
601 North II - Reach 3 - Cross Section 10 - Riffle
590
589.5
589
588.5
588
--
---
-- - ---
--
Q
ro
58T-5
587
566-5
586
585,5-
686
0
5 16 15 20
25
Distance (R)
30 35
46
45
56
Baseline -Year Year2
Year3
Year4
Year5
--AA,111.Banktut
Cross Section 10 Riffie
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elemAon Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used -
587.8
587.8
587.8
587.8
587.8
Banldull Width (f)
12.0
11.8
12.4
12.6
20.6
Flood rone Width f)
>200
X200
X200
X200
>507 -
50.0BankfuI[
Ban kfu I[Mean Depth (ft)
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.1
0.7
BanldullMaxDe th (ft)
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.6
1.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (R`)
14.4
14.0
13.5
13.3
14.0
Ban ldull WidthlDe th Ratio -
9.9
9.9
11.3
11.9
30.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio -
X16.7
717
716.2
X15.9
72.4
Ban kfull Bank Heigh t Ratio -
1.6
1.0
1.0
1.6
1.1

Figure 6. Longitudinal Profile with Annual Overlays
607
606
605
604
603
O
602
W
601
600
599
598
Appendix D Stream Geomorphology Data
601 North II Wicker Branch
Reach 1
Longitudinal Profile
Stationing 1+00 to 6+60
r"op rx'fo 211919 2X1r19 �X°o
IX
so
Station (feet)
—TW-MY0 TW-MY111121113 TW-MY26118I2014 TW-MY351512015 TW-MY43115I2016 fTW-MY51112912017 O Structure -MYO ■ BKF

607
606
605
604
603
602
601
600
599
598
597
596
s~ 595
0
594
W 593
592
591
590
589
588
587
586
585
584
583
Appendix D Stream Geomorphology Data
601 North II Reach 213
Longitudinal Profile
Reach 2 - Stationing 6+60 to 24+35
Reach 3 - Stationing 24+35 to 25+08
Reach 2 I Reach 3
■ Remnant Beaver Dam 1
Ren ant Bearer Dam 1
I
' 6-R 1
• I
' ant Bearer Da m
Avera a Bankfu Slope 1
1
Jk-
1
I
' I
Xs9- 1
■41 1
I
1
I
I
XS7-P I MO -R
I
■ ' I
4
AIAIL
XSS-P 1
I
I
6x6
9P 4k -1 T� 4G- j8 A 2?
0 0 6 xao Xao xsa Xco 6o xao X6o
Station (feet)
TW-MYO TW - MY1 11/21/2013 TW - MY2 6119/2014 TW - MY3 5/6/2015 TW - MY4 3/16/2016 f TW - MY5 11/29/2017 O Structure - MYO ■ BKF ----- WS

609
608
607
606
605
604
O
W 603
602
601
600
599
601 North II UT -Wicker Branch
Reach 5
Longitudinal Profile
Stationing 8+86 to 14+84
Average BankfuD Slope
XS3-R
-P
Appendix D Stream Geomorphology Data
f9 4x J4x !� ✓1 �.P l*
s° s° 9 Xso Xs° x� X�°
Station (feet)
TW-MY65/10)2011 TW-MY111/21/13 TW-MY2611812014-TW -MY351512015-TW -MY4311512016 BTW-MY511/29)2017 o Structure-MY6 ■ SKF

Appendix D - Stream Geomorphology Data
Table Ila. Baseline Morphology & Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
N/A - Item does not apply.
IMY1 data updated to show corrected bankfull width, W/D ratio, and entrenchment ratio calculations.
2 Data updated to show corrected calculations.
Note: In MY5, Bankfull Bank Height Ratio was calculated on riffles using the baseline bankfull elevation. This method was used because the dimension of the channels has not changed enough to alter the bankfull elevation.
Table Ila.
Baseline Morphology & Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
601 North II / Project No. 95025
Cross -Section 1 (Riffle)
Ur to Wicker (Reach 4)
Cross -Section 2 (Pool)
UT to Wicker (Reach 5)
Cross -Section 3 (Riffle)
UT to Wicker (Reach 5)
Cross -Section 41 (Riffle)
Wicker (Reach 1)
Cross -Section 51 (Pool)
Wicker (Reach 1)
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
616.5
616.5
616.5
616.5
616.5
616.5
604.0
604.0
604.0
604.0
604.0
604.0
603.9
603.9
603.9
603.9
603.9
603.9
604.5
604.5
604.5
604.5
604.5
604.5
604.4
604.4
604.4
604.4
604.4
604.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.9
8.3
8.0
8.6
7.9
6.3
17.6
15.4
17.1
18.6
17.6
16.5
11.0
10.8
10.8
11.9
11.7
12.4
11.4
12.5
12.3
11.0
11.2
12.0
14.2
15.4
15.5
16.1
20.0
18.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
23.1
>23
>23
>23
>23
27.4
64.1
>100
>100
>100
>100
>68.3
65.5
>100
>100
>100
>100
>68.2
59.7
>100
>100
>100
>100
>65.6
65.6
>100
>100
>100
>100
>68.8
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.5
1 0.5
0.5 1
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.7
0.9
1.0
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7 1
0.7
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
1 0.7
0.8
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.7
1.8
2.1
2.2
2.2
2.2
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.3
1.5
1.3
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.5
1.8
1.7
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
4.2
4.1
3.9
3.9
4.0
2.7
12.8
13.6
16.4
16.7
16.0
17.8
8.5
8.5
9.5
9.1
8.6
9.7
7.9
7.2
8.2
7.5
8.4
9.0
11.5
6.1
9.4
11.8
14.1
12.0
Bankf ill Width/Depth Ratio
18.5
16.9
16.4
19.0
15.6
14.9
24.5
17.5
17.8
20.8
19.2
16.2
14.1
14.6
12.3
15.6
14.6
15.9
16.6
21.7
18.1
16.1
14.9
16.0
17.6
19.3
19.9
21.9
28.4
27.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
2.6
>2.8
>2.9
>2.7
>2.9
4.3
3.6
>6.5
>5.9
>5.4
>5.7
N/A
6.0
>9
>9.2
>8.4
>8.6
>5.5
5.2
>8
>8.1
>9.1
>8.9
>5.5
4.6
>6.5
>6.5
>6.2
>5.0
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1
1.0
1.01.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.8
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
d50 (mm)
-
0.062
0.062
1.1
0.062
16.0
-
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
3.5
-
4.9
6.9
40
1.6
66.0
-
0.06
0.062
0.062
6.9
27.0
-
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
6.1
Cross -Section 6 (Riffle)
Wicker (Reach 2)
Cross -Section 7 (Pool)
Wicker (Reach 2)
Cross -Section 8 (Pool)
Wicker (Reach 2)
Cross -Section 9 (Riffle)
Wicker (Reach 2)
Cross -Section 10 (Riffle)
Wicker (Reach 3)
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
1V1Y32
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
596.2
596.2
596.2
596.2
596.2
596.2
596.1
596.1
596.1
591.6
591.6
591.6
591.3
591.3
591.3
591.3
591.3
591.3
591.0
591.0
591.0
591.0
591.0
591.0
-
587.8
587.8
587.8
587.8
587.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.5
11.9
11.8
11.9
12.7
13.2
12.8
12.8
12.9
12.9
12.7
13.8
12.7
13.3
13.4
13.6
14.1
12.2
11.6
11.5
11.3
11.1
11.6
10.9
-
12.0
11.8
12.4
12.6
20.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
69.2
>90
>90
>90
>90
>68.8
69.5
>125
>125
>125
>125
>69
69.5
>200
>200
>200
>200
>69
69.7
>200
>200
>200
>200
>69.3
-
>200
>200
>200
>200
>50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.1
1 1.0
1.1 1
0.9
1.1
1.1
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.0
2.2
2.1
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.7
1.8
2.0
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
-
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.1
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.7
1 1.7
1.9
1.6
1.8
1.7
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.3
3.5
2.9
3.1
3.2
3.2
3.3
3.4
1.8
1.7
1.8
1.7
1.8
1.8
-
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.6
1.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
12.1
12.0
12.9
11.2
13.6
14.2
23.2
24.2
25.5
25.2
27.6
29.1
19.9
22.9
23.5
22.9
25.7
24.2
13.0
12.3
12.4
11.7
12.5
12.5
-
14.4
14.0
13.5
13.3
14.0
Bankf ill Width/Depth Ratio
10.8
11.8
10.8
12.7
11.8
12.2
7.0
6.8
6.5
6.6
5.8
6.5
8.1
7.8
7.6
8.1
7.8
6.1
10.4
10.7
10.2
10.6
10.8
9.5
-
9.9
9.9
11.3
11.9
30.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
6.0
>7.5
>7.6
>7.5
>7.1
>5.2
5.4
>9.8
>9.7
>9.7
>9.9
N/A
5.5
>15
>14.9
>14.7
>14.2
N/A
6.0
>17.5
>17.8
>17.9
>17.2
>6.3
-
>16.7
>17
>16.2
>15.9
>2.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
1.0
1 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A 1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
-
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
d50 (mm)
-
0.062
15
11
2.6
48.0
-
0.062
1.7
1.2
1.9
25.0
-
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.16
0.062
0.06
1.4
0.062
0.63
48.0
-
24
24
6.7
11
56.0
N/A - Item does not apply.
IMY1 data updated to show corrected bankfull width, W/D ratio, and entrenchment ratio calculations.
2 Data updated to show corrected calculations.
Note: In MY5, Bankfull Bank Height Ratio was calculated on riffles using the baseline bankfull elevation. This method was used because the dimension of the channels has not changed enough to alter the bankfull elevation.

Appendix D - Stream Geomorphology Data
Table 11b. Stream Reach Data Summary
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri=Riffle /Ru=Run/P=Pool/G=Glide/S=Step
*Percentages based on riffle and pool pebble counts.
'No water present at time of survey; MY1 and MY2 profile values based on bedform only.
^Mean bankfull width, W/D ratio, entrenchment ratio updated to reflect accurate calculations.
Table 11b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
601 North II - Wicker Branch Reach 1 630 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY- it, �
MY -2 I
MY -3
AW -4
MY -5
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle
Min Mean Med Max
SD
n
Min Mean Med Max
SD
n
Min Mean Med Max
SD
n Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
-
11.4
- -
1
12.5
-
1
-
12.3
- -
-
1
11.0
- -
-
1
-
11.0
- -
-
1
-
12.0
-
-
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
-
59.7
- -
1
>100
-
1
-
>100
- -
-
1
>100
- -
-
1
-
>100
- -
-
1
-
>65.6
-
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
-
0.7
- -
1
0.6
-
1
-
0.8
- -
-
1 -
0.7
- -
-
1
-
0.7
- -
-
1
-
0.8
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
-
1.3
- -
1
-
1.1
-
1
1 -
1.2
- -
1 -
1.2
- -
-
1
-
1.2
- -
-
1
-
1.5
1
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
-
7.9
- -
1
-
7.2
-
1
-
8.2
-
1 -
7.5
- -
-
I
-
7.5
- -
-
I
-
9.0
1
Width/Depth Ratio
-
16.6
- -
1
-
21.7
1
-
18.1
-
1 -
16.1
- -
-
1
-
16.1
- -
-
1
-
16.0
1
Entrenchment Ratio
-
5.2
- -
1
-
>8
-
1
-
>8.1
-
1 -
>6.2
- -
-
1
-
>9.1
- -
-
1
-
>5.5
1
Bank Height Ratio
-
1.0
- -
1
-
1.0
- -
1
-
1.0
- -
1 -
1.0
- -
-
1
-
1.0
- -
-
I
-
0.9
-
1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
4.2
12.3
11.5 33.3
6.0
22.0
3.3
6.9
6.3 11.0
2.1
18
1.9
7.8
7.3 12.9
3.3
19 4.8
8.5
7.6 15.5
3.1
19
4.7
8.7
8.8 17.4
3.2
19
4.5
8.9
8.2 16.9
3.4
17
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.001 0.017 0.017 0.043
0.0
22
-
-
- -
-
-
-
-
- -
-
- 0.000
0.016
0.015 0.035
0.010
19
0.000
0.019
0.016 0.059 0.015
19
0.000
0.017
0.016 0.065 0.031
17
Pool Length (ft)
4.7
10.8
10.4 20.0
4.2
20
7.3
14.1
12.0 37.6
6.8
19
6.9
12.3
12.0 19.0
3.5
20 8.0
13.5
14.5 17.4
2.9
21
7.4
13.5
13.4 18.7
3.6
20
3.4
10.8
10.0 16.0
3.9
21
Pool Max Depth (ft)
1.4
1.9
1.9 2.2
0.2
20
1.1
1.6
1.6 2.0
0.3
19
1.3
1.7
1.7 2.2
0.2
21 1.7
2.2
2.2 2.5
0.2
21
1.5
1.9
1.8 2.3
0.2
20
0.9
1.5
1.4 2.1
0.3
21
Pool Spacing (ft) 1
13.4
30.7
26.9 57.8
10.0
19
16.4
27.7
26.9 41.8
7.0
19
8.9
26.0
25.8 38.0
7.2
20 7.7 1
26.2
25.4 34.3
6.1
20
1 16.6
27.3
28.6 36.3
5.8
19
7.7 1
25.4
25.2 36.7
7.6
20
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
13.4
20.1
20.2 29.7
4.00
21
Radius of Curvature (ft)
14.4
17.9
16.4 27.7
3.90
23
Re: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
1.30
1.60
1.40 2.40
0.3
23
Meander Wavelength (ft)
13.7
51.5
51.8 87.9
15.30
21
Meander Width Ratio
1.2
4.5
4.5 7.7
1.30
21
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
660
557
562
562
558
552
Sinuosity (ft)
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
-
-
-
0.0090
0.0089
-
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0090
0.0094
0.0093
0.0083
0.0083
0.0088
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
-
-
-
I - 1
124%110%152%114%10%
1
128% 1
8%
46% 18% 1
1% 1
1 30'% 1
7%
53% 1 9%
1 0% 1
1 31%
1 7%
51% 1 11% 1
0% 1
127% 1
23%
41% 1 8% 1
0%
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri=Riffle /Ru=Run/P=Pool/G=Glide/S=Step
*Percentages based on riffle and pool pebble counts.
'No water present at time of survey; MY1 and MY2 profile values based on bedform only.
^Mean bankfull width, W/D ratio, entrenchment ratio updated to reflect accurate calculations.

Appendix D - Stream Geomorphology Data
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru= Run /P= Pool /G= Glide /S=Step
*Percentages based on riffle and pool pebble counts.
'No water present at time of survey; MYl and MY2 profile values based on bedform only.
Table 11b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
601 North II - Wicker Branch Reach 2 (1356 feet
Parameter
Baseline
My_ 1 t
MY -2
t
MY -3
MY -4
MY -5
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min Mean Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.5
11.6
11.6
11.6
0.1
2
11.5
11.7
11.7
11.9
0.28
2
11.3
11.6
11.6
11.8
0.4
2
11.1
11.5
11.5 11.9
0.6
2
11.6
12.2
12.2 12.7
0.8
2
10.9
12.1
12.1
13.2
1.6
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
69.2
69.5
69.5
69.7
0.4
2
90
145
145
200
77.8
2
90
145
145
200
77.8
2
90.0
145.0
145.0 200.0 77.8
2
90.0
145.0
145.0 200.0
77.8
2
68.8
69.1
69.1
69.3
0.4
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
0
2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
0.04
2
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
0
2
0.9
1.0
1.0 1.1
0.1
2
1.1
1.1
1.1 1.1
0.0
2
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
0.0
2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.7
1.8
1.8
1.8
0.1
2
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
0.02
2
1.8
1.9
1.9
1.9
0.07
2
1.6
1.7
1.7 1.7
0.1
2
1.8
1.8
1.8 1.8
0.0
2
1.7
1.8
1.8
1.8
0.1
2
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
12.1
12.6
12.6
13.0
1 0.6 1
2
1 12.01
12.21
12.21
12.3
0.21
2
12.4
12.7
1 12.7 1
12.9 1
0.35
2
11.2
11.5 1
11.5 1 11.7
0.4 1
2
12.5
1 13.1
13.1 13.6
0.8
2
12.5
13.4
13.41
14.2
1.2
2
Width/Depth Ratio
10.4
10.6
10.6
10.8
0.3
2
10.7
11.3
11.3
11.8
0.78
2
10.2
10.5
10.5
10.8
0.42
2
10.6
11.7
11.7 12.7
1.5
2
10.8
11.3
11.3 11.8
0.7
2
9.5
10.9
10.9
12.2
1.9
2
Entrenchment Ratio
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
0
2
7.5
12.5
12.5
17.5
7.07
2
7.6
12.7
12.7
17.8
7.2
2
7.5
12.7
12.7 17.9
7.4
2
7.1
12.2
12.2 17.2
7.1
2
5.2
5.8
5.8
6.3
0.8
2
Bank Height Ratio
19.3
21.4
21.4
23.5
3
2
1.0
1.0
1.0 1
1.0
0
2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1
0
2
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0
2
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0.0
2
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.1
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
6.3
17.3
18.1
38.7
7.5
33
8.1
17.1
15.7
32.9
7.0
31
6.8
16.1
15.2
30.7
6.8
31
4.4
15.2
14.1 36.6
7.6
31
2.2
16.7
16.3 34.5
8.1
31
4.2
15.6
11.9
39.1
8.9
33
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.001
0.017
0.013
0.062
0.013
33
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.008
0.019
0.016 0.050 0.01
31
0.000 0.026 0.016 0.110 0.028
31
-0.048 0.017 0.005 0.178 0.047
33
Pool Length (ft)
6.1
24.2
23.7
62.0
11.9
33
12.6
29.2
26.2
57.3
11.3
33
13.7
29.4
25.4
65.0
11.7
33
17.5
32.7
29.1 66.2
11.2
33
15.4
27.3
24.1 55.5
9.6
34
4.5
22.7
16.5
43.8
13.1
33
Pool Max Depth (ft)
1.7
2.9
2.8
3.8
0.4
33
1.4
2.8
2.8
3.8
0.5
33
1.7
3.0
3.0
3.7
0.4
33
2.1
3.2
3.3 3.9
0.4
33
1.9
2.9
3.0 3.5
0.4
34
1.5
2.5
2.6
3.1
0.5
33
Pool Spacing (ft)
25.5
53.6
53.2
103.3
19.5
33
24.4
54.0
52.2
112.6
18.3
32
20.1
53.1
48.1
113.5
20.0
32
14.6
53.4
48.1 114.2
19.8
32
24.7
52.3
51.3 113.4
19.1
34
23.5
54.0
53.0
95.9
17.2
32
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
18.3
31.1
30.6
49.5
8.8
24
Radius of Curvature (ft)
28.3
40.2
37.8
61.8
10.1
28
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
2.40
3.50
3.30
5.30
0.9
28
Meander Wavelength (ft)
13.7
114.4
113.3
226.5
46.9
24
Meander Width Ratio
1.2
9.9
9.8
19.5
4.0
24
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
E4
E4
E4
E5
E5
E4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,775
1,777
1,779
1,775
1,774
1,786
Sinuosity (ft)
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
-
-
-
0.0072
0.0067
0.0075
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0070
0.0071
0.0070
0.0071
0.0071
0.0072
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
-
-
31%
2%
57%
9%
0%
28%
3%
55%
13%
0%
27%
3%
61% 9%
1%
29%
5%
52% 12%
1%
28%
14%
42%
16%
0%
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru= Run /P= Pool /G= Glide /S=Step
*Percentages based on riffle and pool pebble counts.
'No water present at time of survey; MYl and MY2 profile values based on bedform only.

Appendix D - Stream Geomorphology Data
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri = Riffle / Ru = Run / P = Pool / G = Glide / S = Step
*Percentages based on riffle and pool pebble counts.
'No water present at time of survey; MY I, MY2, and MY3 profile values based on bedform only.
'Reach 3 cross-section was added during MY1; no data available for MYO
3 Data updated to show corrected calculations.
Table 11b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
601 North II- Wicker Branch Reach 3 (414 feet
Parameter Baseline
MY- 1
MY - 2'
MY - 3''2
MY - 4
MY - 5'
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle Min Mean Med Max SD
n Min Mean
Med Max
SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean
Med Max SD
n Min Mean
Med Max SD
n Min Mean
Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width (ft) -
- 12.0
- 1 11.8 1 12.4
- -
1 - 12.6
1 20.6
- - - 1
Floodprone Width (ft) -
- >200
- 1 - >200 1 >200
-
1 - >200
1 >50.0
- - - 1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) -
- 1.2
- 1 1.2 1 1.1
-
1 - 1.1
1 0.7
- - - 1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) -
- 1.7
- 1 1.7 1 1.6
-
1 - 1.6
1 1.8
- - - 1
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft) -
- 14.4
- 1 14.0 1 13.5
-
1 - 13.3
1 14.0
- - - 1
Width/Depth Ratio -
- 9.9
- 1 9.9 1 11.3
1 - 11.9
1 30.3
- - - 1
Entrenchment Ratio -
- > 16.7-
1 > 17 1 >16.21
- - -
1 - >15.9
1 >2.4
- - - 1
Bank Height Ratio -
- 1.0
- 1 1.0 1 1.0
- - -
1 - 1.0
1 1.1
- - - 1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) -
- - 27.6
- 1 31.7 1 25.6
- -
1 24.9
1 24.2
- - - 1
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) -
- - -
- - -
- -
- - 0.011
1 0.010
- - - 1
Pool Length (ft) -
- - 29.0
- 1 25.7 1 29.0
- -
1 - 28.1
1 30.70
- - - 1
Pool Max Depth (ft) -
- - 2.7
- 1 3.0 1 3.1
- -
1 - 2.5
1 2.9
- - - 1
Pool Spacing (ft) -
- - -
- 0 - 0
- -
0 - -
-
- - - -
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft) -
-
Radius of Curvature (ft) -
-
Re: Bankfull Width (ft/ft) -
-
Meander Wavelength (ft) -
-
Meander Width Ratio -
-
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgcn Classification
E4
E4
E4
E4
E4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
80
79
81
81
84
Sinuosity (ft)
1.17
1.18
1.17
1.17
1.15
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
NA
N/A
N/A
0.0067
N/A
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0073
0.0070
0.0100
0.0071
0.0118
Ri% /Ru% /P% /G% /S% -
44% -
46% 10%
51% - 41% 1 8% 42%
48% 1 9% -
42%
47% 1 11%
29% 25%
36% 1 10% 0%
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri = Riffle / Ru = Run / P = Pool / G = Glide / S = Step
*Percentages based on riffle and pool pebble counts.
'No water present at time of survey; MY I, MY2, and MY3 profile values based on bedform only.
'Reach 3 cross-section was added during MY1; no data available for MYO
3 Data updated to show corrected calculations.

Appendix D - Stream Geomorphology Data
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru= Run /P= Pool /G= Glide /S=Step
*Percentages based on riffle and pool pebble counts.
Table 11b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
601 North II - UT to Wicker Branch Reach 4 826 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY -1 MY- 2 MY -3
MY -4
MY -5
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle
Min Mean Med Max SD
n
Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD
n
Min Mean Med Max SD
n
Min Mean Med Max SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
- 8.9 - - -
1
- 8.3
- - - 1 - 8.0 - - - 1 - 8.6 - - -
1
- 7.9 - - -
1
- 6.3 - - -
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
- 23.1 - - -
1
- >23
- - - 1 - >23 - - - 1 - >23 - - -
1
- >23 - - -
1
- 27.4 - - -
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
- 0.5 - - -
1
- 0.5
- - - 1 - 0.5 - - - 1 - 0.5 - - -
1
- 0.5 - - -
1
- 0.4 - - -
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
- 0.7 - - -
1
- 0.7
- - - 1 - 0.8 - - - 1 - 0.8 - - -
1
- 0.9 - - -
1
- 1.0 - - -
1
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
- 4.2 - -
1
- 4.1
- - - 1 - 3.9 - - - 1 - 3.9 - - -
1
- 4.0 - - -
1
- 2.7 - - -
1
Width/Depth Ratio
- 18.5 - - -
1
- 16.9
- - - 1 - 16.4 - - - 1 - 19.0 - - -
1
- 15.6 - - -
1
- 14.9 - - -
1
Entrenchment Ratio I
- 2.6 - - -
1
- >2.8
- - - 1 - >2.9 - - - 1 - >2.7 - - -
1
- >2.9 - - -
1
- 4.3 - - -
1
Bank Height Ratio
- 1.0 - - -
1
- 1.0
- - - 1 - 1.0 - - - 1 - 1.0 - - -
1
- 1.0 - - -
1
- 1.0 - - -
1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
- - - - -
-
- -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
- - - - -
-
- - - - -
-
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
- - - - -
-
- -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
- - - - -
-
- - - - -
-
Pool Length (ft)
- - - - -
-
- -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
- - - - -
-
- - - - -
-
Pool Max Depth (ft)
- - - -
-
- -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
- - - - -
-
- - - - -
-
Pool Spacing (ft) I
- - - -
-
- -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
- - - - -
-
- - - - -
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
- - - - -
-
Radius of Curvature (ft)
- - - - -
-
Re: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
- - - - -
Meander Wavelength (ft)
- - - - -
Meander Width Ratio
- - - - -
-
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
-
- -
-
-
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
-
- -
-
-
Sinuosity (ft)
-
- -
-
-
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
-
- -
-
-
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
-
- -
-
-
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%l
I- -
- -I I I- - -I
I- - - - -
- - - - -
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru= Run /P= Pool /G= Glide /S=Step
*Percentages based on riffle and pool pebble counts.

Appendix D - Stream Geomorphology Data
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru= Run /P= Pool /G= Glide /S=Step
*Percentages based on riffle and pool pebble counts.
'No water present at time of survey; MY and MY2 profile values based on bedform only.
^MY1 data misreported, numbers updated to reflect accurate riffle length calculations
Table 11b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
601 North 11 -UT to Wicker Branch Reach 5 (534 feet)
Parameter
Baseline
MY - it,
MY -2
MY - 3
MY -4
MY -5
Dimension & Substrate -Riffle
Min Mean Med Max
SD
n
Min Mean Med Max
SD n
Min Mean Med Max SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean Med Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
-
11.0
- -
-
-
-
11.1
-
1
- 10.8 - - -
1
11.9
-
-
1
-
11.7
- -
-
1
-
12.4
- -
-
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
-
65.5
- -
-
-
-
>100
- -
- 1
- >100 - - -
1
-
>100
-
-
1
-
>100
- -
-
1
-
>68.2
- -
-
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
-
0.8
- -
-
-
-
0.8
- -
- 1
- 0.9 - - -
1
-
0.8
-
-
1
I -
0.8
- -
-
1
-
0.8
- -
-
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
-
1.3
- -
-
-
-
1.3
- -
- 1
- 1.3 - - -
1
-
1.4
- -
-
1
-
1.3
- -
-
1
-
1.5
- -
-
1
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
-
8.5
- -
-
-
-
8.5
- -
- 1
- 9.5 - - -
1
-
9.1
- -
-
1
-
8.6
- -
-
1
-
9.7
- -
-
1
Width/Depth Ratio
-
14.1
- -
-
-
-
14.6
-
1
- 12.3 - -
1
-
15.6
-
-
1
-
14.6
- -
-
1
-
15.9
- -
-
1
Entrenchment Ratio
-
6.0
- -
-
-
-
>9
- -
- 1
- >9.2 - -
1
-
>8.4
-
-
1
-
>8.6
- -
-
I
-
>5.5
- -
-
1
Bank Height Ratio
-
1.0
- -
-
1.0
- -
- 1
- 1.0 - -
1
-
1.0
-
-
1
-
1.0
- -
-
1
-
0.8
- -
-
1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
5.1
12.8
12.4 23.2
4.5
16
3.1
9.7
9.3 18.5
3.9 17
3.2 7.7 6.9 14.5 3.5
17
2.2
9.0
8.3 14.8
3.1
17
4.9
10.1
10.9 16.9
4.0
17
4.9
11.3
10.3 21.4
4.3
17
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.001 0.016 0.016 0.035 0.010
16
-
-
- -
- -
- - - - -
-
0.001
0.018
0.014 0.053
0.013
17
0.003
0.021
0.016 0.057
0.014
17
0.000 0.018 0.006 0.088
0.036
17
Pool Length (ft)
3.2
12.4
12.3 29.5
6.3
18
6.0
16.0
14.5 38.3
7.3 19
7.4 17.0 15.8 28.8 5.7
19
8.6
16.7
16.3 37.6
6.9
18
5.5
15.4
14.6 36.8
6.5
18
3.9
14.1
14.7 26.7
5.16
19
Pool Max Depth (ft)
1.6
2.2
2.3 2.6
0.3
18
1.5
2.0
2.0 2.6
0.3 19
1.8 2.2 2.2 2.7 0.3
19
1.9
2.3
2.4 2.6
0.2
18
1.8
2.3
2.3 2.8
0.3
18
1.4
2.0
2.0 2.8
0.4
19
Pool Spacing (ft),
14.5
30.2
31.7 42.2
6.9
17
10.8
28.7
30.8 42.0
8.8 19
10.5 29.1 30.4 48.7 9.9
19
13.9
30.7
30.8 54.3
7.9
18
21.7
31.7
32.3 39.8
5.1
18
19.7
30.6
29.5 46.6
7.4
18
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
15.7
24.3
25.6 29.8
4.7
18
Radius of Curvature (ft)
12.3
19.9
18.8 31.4
5.8
19
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
1.10
1.80
1.70 2.90
0.5
19
Meander Wavelength (ft)
23.3
54.3
52.3 88.5
15.6
18
Meander Width Ratio
2.1
4.9
4.8 8.0
1.4
18
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
646
600
591
589
595
588
Sinuosity (ft)
1.2
1.25
1.27
1.25
1.28
1.25
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
-
-
-
0.0103
0.0108
-
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0110
0.0114
0.0113
0.0102
0.0112
0.0116
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
-
I-
- 1-
-1
130%15%
56% 1 8%
1
24% 5% 158%114%1 0% 1
28%
3%
56% 1 13%
1 0% 1
31%
1 5%
151% 1 11%
1 2% 1
33%
1 9%
46% 1 13%
1 0%
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru= Run /P= Pool /G= Glide /S=Step
*Percentages based on riffle and pool pebble counts.
'No water present at time of survey; MY and MY2 profile values based on bedform only.
^MY1 data misreported, numbers updated to reflect accurate riffle length calculations

Appendix D — Stream Geomorphology Data
Table 12. Pebble Count Data Summary
Figure 7. MY5 Stream Reach Substrate Composition Charts
Chart 1.
601 NI I MY5 - Substrate Composition
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0% ■
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
■ R1 ■ R2 ■ R3 ■ R4 ■ R5
MY1 - 2013
MY2 - 2014
MY3 - 2015
MY4 - 2016
MY5 - 2017
Stream
Pebble Count
Pebble Count
Pebble Count
Pebble Count
Pebble Count
Reach
D50 (mm)
D84 (mm)
/
D50 (mm)
D84 (mm)
D50 (mm)
/
D84 (mm)
D50 (mm)
/
D84 (mm)
D50 (mm)
D84 (mm)
Reach 1
0.062
16.031
0.062
24.031
0.062
23.2
3.531
27.031
16.55
64
Reach 2
0.062
19.5405
4.7405
57.2655
3.831
26.7655
1.3225
31.35
30.2655
51.0155
Reach 3
26
93
27
110
7.2
100
13
110
56
150
Reach 4
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
1.1
29
0.062
11
16
56
Reach 5
3.231
52.55
3.481
28.25
0.631
37
0.831
31.2
34.75
62.5
Figure 7. MY5 Stream Reach Substrate Composition Charts
Chart 1.
601 NI I MY5 - Substrate Composition
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0% ■
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
■ R1 ■ R2 ■ R3 ■ R4 ■ R5

Chart 2.
Chart 3.
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Appendix D — Stream Geomorphology Data
Reach 1 -Substrate Composition
Silt/Clay Sand
Silt/Clay
Gravel Cobble Boulder
■ MY1 ■ MY2 MY3 MY4 ■ MY5
Reach 2 - Substrate Composition
11
Sand Gravel
■ MY1 ■ MY2 ■ MY3
Cobble
MY4 ■ MY5
Boulder
Bedrock
Bedrock

Chart 4.
Chart 5.
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Appendix D — Stream Geomorphology Data
Reach 3 - Substrate Composition
I fL I
Silt/Clay Sand
Gravel
0 . 0
Cobble Boulder
Reach 4 - Substrate Composition
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel
0 MY1 0 MY2
Cobble
MY3 MY4 0 MY5
— ■
Boulder
Bedrock
M
Bedrock

Chart 6.
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Appendix D — Stream Geomorphology Data
Reach 5 - Substrate Composition
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel
Cobble
■ MY1 ■ MY2 1 MY3 f MY4 ■ MY5
Boulder Bedrock

Appendix E
Hydrology Data
Table 13. Verification of Bankfull Events
Chart 7. Daily Precipitation Data for Monroe, NC
Table 14. Monroe, NC Rainfall Summary 2017

Appendix E — Hydrology Data
Table 13. Verification of Bankfull Events- Reach 2
Date of Data Collection
Method
Feet Above B ankfull Photo #
Elevation (if available)
November - 2013
Wrack Lines
September - 2014
Crest Gauge
1.5
February - 2015
Crest Gauge
0.7
May - 2015
Crest Gauge
0.4
November - 2015
Crest Gauge
1.0
January - 2016
Crest Gauge
1.1
March - 2016
Crest Gauge
0.5
October - 2017
Wrack Lines
1
Table 13. Verification of Bankfull Events - Reach 5
Date of Data Collection
Method
Feet Above Bankfull Photo #
Evevation (if available)
Novemeber - 2013
Wrack Lines
September - 2014
Crest Gauge
1.2
February - 2015
Crest Gauge
0.2
May - 2015
Crest Gauge
0.1
November - 2015
Wrack Lines
January - 2016
Crest Gauge
0.1
December - 2017
Wrack Lines
2
Photo 1: Wrack line on Reach 2
Photo 2: Wrack line on Reach 5
(10/18/2017) (11/28/2017)

Appendix E — Hydrology Data
Figure 9. Daily Precipitation Data for Monroe, NC
2017 Precipitation Data for 601 NII Site
10
Growing Season
9
8
7
y
6
t
U
C----
. -- - --- --
C
-
G 5
'a
`
•V 4
CL
3
`
------- ---
2
- ---
---------
.__-
1
0
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Months
Monroe Daily Rainfall Growing Season Monroe Monthly Rainfall 30th/70th Percentile

Appendix E - Hydrology Data
Table 14. Monroe, NC Rainfall Summary 2017
Month
Average
Normal Limits
30 Percent 70 Percent
Monroe, NC
Coop Station
January
4.71
3.19
5.62
5.51
February
3.81
2.48
4.58
1.31
March
4.85
3.33
5.78
2.62
April
3.02
1.75
3.68
6.27
May
3.53
2.34
4.23
5.87
June
4.32
2.73
5.21
8.08
July
4.63
2.78
5.62
5.49
August
4.53
2.43
5.53
2.67
September
4.38
1.9
5.34
3.95
October
4.04
2.08
5.06
1.87
November
3.33
2.21
3.9
0.73
December
3.58
2.22
4.33
--
Total
48.73
29.44
58.88
44.37