20160233 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report 2017_20171201

Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site
Person County NC -- Tar -Pamlico River HUC# 03020101-0102
MY -1 (2017) Annual Fall Monitoring Report
NC -DEQ Division of Mitigation Services: DMS Project # 97071
Data Collected: Oct -Nov 2017 Final Report: December 2017
?,avi
Environmental
Quality
Submitted To:
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality
DEQ Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Ctr, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
DMS Project Manager: Lindsay Crocker
DEQ -DMS Contract # 006746
MOGENSEN MITIGATION, INC.
P.O. Box 690429 Charlotte, NC 28227
[phone] Rich(a-,MOgMit.com
[phone] Gerald(a),MogMit.com
DM
MOGENSEN WrIGATION. INC

www.Mogmit.com
MMI - Charlotte [phone]
MMI -Raleigh [phone]
20 December 2017
MOGENSEN MITIGATION INC.
Lindsay Crocker
NC Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING
Nm
MOGENSEN MITIGATION, INC
Subject: Tar Headwaters WETLAND Restoration Site #97071, MMI responses to MY1 draft comments.
Dear Lindsay,
Thank you for your prompt review comments on our MY1 Draft Monitoring Report for the Tar River
Headwaters Wetland Restoration (TRHWR) site. Responses to your review comments are provided below:
• Table of Contents, Page 8, and actual table heading: update Table 4 to be titled 'Project Attributes'
Response: Done
• Revise all dates in the text to include full month (Example: do not write Dec, write out December).
Response: Done
• Please remove two references to the contracted area of wetland mitigation. This is not relevant to the
report. Response: Done
• Section 1.1: Project Setting and Pre -Restoration Conditions- Mogensen can use previously reviewed
and approved verbiage to minimize review and comment. Generally, there should not be new verbiage
developed in MY1 describing pre -site conditions at this point in the project. The entire section 1 may
be replaced with section 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 from the MYO report if the provider elects to avoid review of
new information (suggestion, not requirement). Response: Text replaced with MYO report text
Paragraph two section 1.1, use of the word "apparently." Was the site an upland flat headwater or
not? Remove word or remove sentence. Redoximorphic soil conditions are not enough to justify the
assertion this classification. Response: Text replaced with MYO report text
Paragraph four section 1.1. There are statements in here that are not necessarily accurate. For
instance, the pre-treatment gauge data did not provide any justification for the USACE wetland Pre -JD,
please separate those items. Add the word 'acres' after 1.12. The last sentence of this paragraph,
redox is only one hydric soil indicator. Please revise to state only that it was not hydric, rather than
speculate on how redox played into the soil evaluation. Response: Text replaced with MYO report text
Section 1.3. Mitigation Approach and Expected Improvements. Update title to just 'Mitigation
Approach.' A suggestion may be to replace entire section 1.3 with a past -tense section 1.4 of the MYO
report. The mitigation approach should not include detailed construction information as that is
available in the As -Built report, this is more of an overview of the approach here, condensing is advised.
Response: Text mostly replaced with MYO report text, revised to past tense. Kept one new sentence
from the draft report, explaining why effect of ditches is significant despite shallow depths.
Environmental Field Studies ■ Wetland & Stream Delineation ■ 404-401 Permits ■ Mitigation Plans & Banking

MOGENSEN MITIGATION INC.
Current Conditions summary: Paragraph four: Mogensen doesn't have to use 'only' as an adverb to
describe gauge success. In lieu of 'only four gauges,' suggest saying 'four gauges.' Response: Done
Current Conditions Last (5th) paragraph: there is currently no adjustment for soil physical properties in
the hydrology standard. This is an interesting discussion on how soil redox or other hydric soil
indicators may present in soils with higher water holding capacity or clay content through capillary
action, but this is not an accepted indicator for meeting hydrologic standard. DMS suggests that if
Mogensen feels that current methods of measuring hydrologic saturation are inadequate, then it
should be discussed at an IRT meeting rather than in a project -specific monitoring report. The
hydrologic success criteria for this project was proposed and accepted at the Mitigation Plan stage.
Response: Deleted 5th (last) paragraph, and moved one sentence into 4th paragraph: "The monitoring
gauges measure the free water table depth and do not account for capillary fringe saturation which
often extends higher in clay soils (https://www.nccedev.ces.ncsu.edu/eleventh-annual-on-site/soil-
wetness . Using the free water table depth as a conservative measure of ..."
3.0 Monitoring Methods: if you are going to include this in the MY1 report, please put it before the
Current Conditions (2.0) section. Another idea is to remove this section, and update table in goals
under the 'Monitoring Methods' column to show number of monitoring features (i.e. vegetation plots
and gauges) and to include discussion of growing season dates in the Current Conditions section.
Response: Moved Monitoring Methods to Section 2 and Current Conditions to Section 3.
CCPV: Please show which gauges on the CCPV that are meeting and not meeting (could show separate
as meeting, not meeting and N/A if you'd like). Response: Gauges on the CCPV figure have been color -
coded to show which are meeting criteria, not meeting, or not applicable (non-credit area).
With respect to the vegetation plot data, there are some issues with planted stems showing in MY1
that were not recorded in MYO. Review specifically the water oak, willow oak on plots 24 and 25. Is
this just a case of misidentification at MYO? Please provide clarification. Response: Yes, dormant
(leafless) seedlings of oaks, birch vs musclewood, and blackgum vs persimmon were in some cases
misidentified during the MYO survey, and corrected in MY1. There were also a few stems overlooked
in MYO that we found in MY1.
Hydrology graphs, these are fine for MY1, but in the future it is beneficial to show where on the graphs
(during what time of the year) that the gauges are meeting success and the number of days. This will
help justify if hydrology is being attained through antecedent rain conditions or through rainfall driven
events. Please consider this in the future. Response: Gauge graphs in future monitoring reports will
include the start, end, and duration of the longest saturation period for each gauge.
Please provide written response to these comments. After the update is approved, please provide 3 hard
copies and a digital file. Thanks for your work. Response: Upon your approval of these responses and
accompanying 2nd draft report PDF, we will mail the final printed copies and support files on CD.
Gerald Pottern, MMI Raleigh office
NMwww.Mogmit.com Page 12
MOGENSEN MITIGATION, INC

Table of Contents
1.0.
Project Background Summary.............................................................................................................3
1.1. Project Location and Setting.....................................................................................................3
1.2. Pre -Restoration Conditions....................................................................................................... 3
1.3. Mitigation Goals and Performance Criteria.............................................................................. 3
1.4. Mitigation Approach................................................................................................................. 5
2.0.
Monitoring Methods............................................................................................................................ 5
3.0.
Current Conditions Summary.............................................................................................................. 6
4.0.
References............................................................................................................................................ 7
APPENDIX A. Project Background Data
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Attributes
APPENDIX B. Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Table 5. Vegetation Conditions Assessment
Figure 3. Vegetation Plot Photos
Figure 4. Photo Point Photos
APPENDIX C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 6. Vegetation Plot Success Summary
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Stem Count Data
APPENDIX D. Hydrologic Data
Figure 5. Monthly Rainfall Plot with Percentiles
Figure 6. Groundwater Gauge and Rainfall Data
Table 8. Hydrologic Success Attainment
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071
Person County — Tar -Pam HUC 03020101
2
MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

1.0. Project Background Summary
1.1. Project Location and Setting
The Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site (TRHWR) is a full -delivery wetland mitigation project
located in eastern Person County, between Roxboro and Oxford, North Carolina, within the Piedmont
Physiographic Province (Figure 1). The easement comprises 9.98 acres, most of which is drained and
degraded wetlands or former wetlands with hydric soil indicators. The remaining areas include non -hydric
soils, drainage ditches, and a 570 -foot long riparian corridor along a ditch and intermittent stream
connecting the TRHWR site to the adjacent Tar River Headwaters Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset
Mitigation Bank project. Both projects are implemented by Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. (MMI), and are
located on a 228 -acre farm owned by Roy and Joyce Huff, in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin 12 -digit HUC #
03020101-0102. The Huff Farm property is located at 333 Bunnie Huff Road, Oxford NC 27565. The
access road into the TRHWR site is at Latitude = 36.3913, Longitude = -78.8171.
1.2. Pre -Restoration Conditions
The TRHWR site was cleared and ditched for pasture use in the 1940s according to the owner, and was
used for grazing cattle until January 2017 when the conservation easement fence was installed. The project
involves plugging drainage ditches to restore wetland hydrology, fencing to exclude livestock, and planting
native trees and shrubs to restore a Headwater Forest wetland ecosystem similar to what occurred prior to
site clearing and drainage. Remnant native trees left for shade, hydrophytic groundcover plants mixed
among the pasture grasses, and plant species recorded in adjacent natural forests (on the same soil mapping
unit) provided data for the planting plan.
The project will restore approximately 7.65 acres of headwater riparian wetland (6.53 acres reestablishment
plus 1.12 acres rehabilitation) and will generate an estimated 7.28 or more riparian wetland mitigation
credits. Approximately 1.27 acres with non -hydric soils in the southeast corner of the mitigation site will
also be reforested, and a 100 -foot wide by 570 -ft long riparian corridor (1.06 acre) extending southeastward
along the ditch will connect the TRHWR site to MMI's adjacent stream restoration and nutrient buffer bank
project to the south. Total acreage of the wetland mitigation site and riparian connector is 9.98 acres.
Restoration activities including tree planting, surface flow dispersal, and cattle exclusion will reduce soil
erosion and nutrient -enriched runoff from adjacent pasture and cropland within its watershed, and help
retain agricultural chemicals used on these lands. It is expected to improve water quality and habitat in the
receiving tributary and reduce fine sediment loading which will enhance the overall watershed particularly
in the adjacent stream and nutrient mitigation bank.
1.3. Mitigation Goals and Performance Criteria
The subject watershed HUC #03020101-0102 is designated by NCDEQ as a Targeted Local Watershed
(TLW) for water quality improvement projects, and the Tar River reach within and downstream of this
local HUC is recognized as a Significant Natural Heritage Area (SNHA) for its high diversity of aquatic
life including protected species of river mussels and fishes. The TRHWR project is intended to support
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County — Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

these TLW and SNHA designations by improving water quality and habitat on the property and
downstream. Specific project goals and objectives as identified in the TRHWR Final Mitigation Plan
(December 2016) include:
GOALS:
• Restore the natural jurisdictional wetland hydro -period to five or more acres of forested
wetland within a nine -acre site;
• Restore forested wetland habitat and improve habitat connectivity between Denny Store
Gabbro Forest (NHP Natural Heritage Area) to the north and the Tar River tributaries;
• Buffer storm water runoff from fecal and other cattle -related pollutants and fertilizer.
OBJECTIVES:
• Plug existing ditches and create sheet flows throughout the site. Aerate soils to reduce
compaction, improve infiltration, and create micro -topography to retain surface flows;
• Preserve the remnant mature Swamp White Oaks (a regionally rare species) for seed source.
Plant appropriate native hardwood trees at a sufficient frequency to establish a diverse
bottomland wetland forest. Treat and/or remove invasive species which may cause problems
for site restoration, including Chinese privet and multi -flora rose;
• Install fencing to exclude cattle and establish a conservation easement to provide permanent
protection on the site.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS and MONITORING:
GOAL
OBJECTIVE
PERFORMANCE
MONITORING
STANDARD
APPROACH
Restore natural
Plug existing ditches and
Water must be on or
Use 11 shallow
hydro -period for
create sheet flow throughout
within 12 inches of the
groundwater self -reading
headwater forest
the site. Aerate soils to reduce
surface for 10% of the
gauges throughout the site
wetland.
compaction, improve
growing season.
at a frequency of about one
infiltration, and create micro-
Hydrographs will
per acre. Visual inspection
topography to retain surface
indicate jurisdictional
of ponding duration.
flows.
hydrology.
Restore forested
Preserve mature swamp white
Survival of 320 stems
Monitor vegetation plots
wetland habitat and
oak trees for seed source. Plant
per acre at year 3, 260
annually and calculate
improve habitat
appropriate native hardwood
stems per acre at year 5
densities of surviving
connectivity with
trees at 10 -ft average spacing
and 210 stems per acre
planted stems.
existing forests.
(435 stems/ac) Treat invasive
at MY 7.
species.
Buffer storm water
Plant trees, fence perimeter
Insure the integrity of
Visual inspection will note
runoff from fecal and
and establish a permanent
the cattle exclusion
fence condition through site
other cattle -related
conservation easement.
fencing for the life of the
pictures. Observations will
nutrient inputs.
contract.
be included in annual
monitoring re orts.
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071
Person County — Tar -Pam HUC 03020101
4
MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

1.4. Mitigation Approach
Prior to restoration, the TRHWR project area contained 6.53 acres of former riparian wetland (ditched and
drained, grazed pasture) with redoximorphic soil characteristics indicating hydric soils, but lacking
adequate wetland hydrology based on groundwater gauge data and field observations during 2015-2016.
Although the drainage ditches are shallow, they have effectively reduced water retention across much of
the site over the past 70 years due to the slow infiltration rate, rapid runoff, and shallow hardpan in these
soils. The project will re-establish jurisdictional wetlands in this area by plugging the drainage ditches to
increase rainfall retention and dispersal, fencing out livestock, controlling invasive species, and planting
suitable native tree species. These 6.53 acres of wetland restoration will generate riparian wetland credits
at 1:1 ratio, yielding 6.53 WMU.
Another 1.12 acres in the TRHWR project area has been less effectively drained by the ditches, and still
has sufficient hydrology to meet jurisdictional wetland criteria, based on groundwater gauge data and field
observations during 2015-2016. The project will rehabilitate these areas of degraded jurisdictional wetland
(grazed pasture with reduced hydrology) by plugging ditches to increase hydrology, fencing out livestock,
and planting suitable native tree species. These 1.12 acres of wetland rehabilitation will generate riparian
wetland credits at 1.5:1 ratio, yielding 0.75 WMU. TRHWR project components and mitigations assets are
summarized in Table 1, matching the proposed assets in the Mitigation Plan.
2.0. Monitoring Methods
Vegetation plots are monitored annually in accordance with current DMS monitoring guidance (June
2017). The nine installed CVS vegetation plots, each 10 x 10 meters, represents 2.8 percent of the planted
mitigation area. Vegetation monitoring will occur between September and early November, prior to the
loss of leaves. The vegetation success criteria are specified in the Performance Standards above. If success
criteria are not met, site maintenance and monitoring will continue until the success criteria are met.
The twelve onsite groundwater monitoring gauges and one offsite reference wetland gauge are downloaded
and maintained at least quarterly. Gauge data in the mitigation credit areas are plotted and evaluated for
success based on the mitigation plan performance standard of continuous saturation within 12 inches of the
ground surface for 10 percent of the growing season. Growing season based on air temperature at a
weather station east of Roxboro is from March 28 to November 3, which is 221 days (from USDA WETS
table). MMI installed a dual -probe soil temperature logger near the middle of the TRHWR site (beside
GW -H) in late January 2017. Soil temperature on the site remained above 41 F at both 10 -inch and 20 -inch
depths throughout February and March 2017. The lowest temperatures recorded were 42.7 F at 10 inches
and 45.4 F at 20 inches. Based on soil temperatures remaining above the USDA -designated temperature
for plant physiological activity, March 1 will be used as the start of the growing season, based on field
discussions with DMS and USACE. The revised growing season length is thus 248 days, and the
groundwater hydrology success criterion is 25 days
The conservation easement perimeter fence and ditch plug integrity will be monitored visually and
documented with photo points.
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County — Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

3.0. Current Conditions Summary
MMI scientists made several post -construction visits to the TRHWR site between March and November
2017 to collect gauge data and evaluate the condition of the ditches, plugs, and planted trees. The CVS
vegetation plot data collection was performed in early October. Eight of the nine CVS plots had 8 to 11
surviving planted stems and met success criteria. One plot (VP -21) had only five surviving planted stems
and failed the criteria. Outside of the CVS plots, planted stem survival looks generally good throughout the
site, with roughly ten percent apparent mortality. Leader die -back is common on many of the taller
seedlings, especially on tulip poplar and river birch, but most of the trees exhibiting leader die -back also
had one to several vigorous basal sprouts. Some of the trees appearing as "dead" in October may also
resprout in 2018. No "low woody density" areas or "invasive exotic" areas were designated this year.
Groundcover vegetation is excellent throughout, with both treated areas (non -wetland and drained wetland)
and non -treated areas (existing wetland) showing dense and diverse herbaceous cover.
All ditch plugs appear to be stable and performing as designed, despite 5 to 6 inches of rainfall over a 3 -day
period in mid-April. Survival of planted trees, livestakes, and herbaceous cover on the plug slopes and tops
appears to be providing adequate erosion protection during this first season when problems are most likely
to occur. Ponding behind all of the ditch plugs was evident within a few days after construction, and
dispersal of surface water from the ditches into the surrounding restoration areas was observed following
large rainfall events in April and May.
Eleven groundwater gauges were installed throughout the TRHWR site during February to March 2016 to
collect hydrology data for use in project design, establishing current wetland jurisdiction areas, water
budgeting, and credit determination. A reference wetland gauge was installed 1,500 ft northeast of the
project easement, within the same soil mapping unit. Some gauges were later relocated during project
construction to provide better representation of expected hydrologic results of the project, and one
additional gauge was added. The 12 current groundwater gauges (A through L) on the project site are
roughly arranged in four transects perpendicular to the main ditch, as recommended by mitigation plan
reviewers during field meetings (Figure 2). Three gauges (A, H and J) are within existing wetland
rehabilitation areas, seven gauges (D, E, F, G, I, L, and K) are within the drained wetland reestablishment
areas, and two gauges (B and C) are downslope from ditch plug #4 in areas not expected to generate
wetland credits.
Wetland hydrology success for the TRHWR site is based on shallow saturation within 12 inches of the
ground surface for 10% of the 248 -day growing season (March 1 to November 3). The monitoring gauges
measure the free water table depth and do not account for capillary fringe saturation which often extends
higher in clay soils (https://www.nccedev.ces.ncsu.edu/eleventh-annual-on-site/soil-wetness/). Using the
free water table depth as a conservative measure of saturation depth, four gauges in the project area (C, E,
H, and L) and the off-site reference gauge met the 10% criterion. The other eight gauges had extensive
periods of shallow saturation ranging from 63 to 95 total days (25% to 38% of the growing season), but
they also had occasional gaps of one or more days when the water table dropped lower than 12 inches. The
maximum consecutive day durations for these eight non -attaining wells ranged from 10 to 17 days (4 to
7%). This pattern of water table fluctuation may be typical for certain headwater wetlands with small
watersheds, perched hydrology, and dense soils with low infiltration. Two of the three gauges within the
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County — Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

existing wetland (rehabilitation) areas did not meet the 10% criterion. Unusually low rainfall during
February and March may also have been a factor in these results.
4.0. References
Lee, Michael T., Peet, Robert K., Roberts, Steven D., Wentworth, Thomas R. (2008). CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation version 4.2, October 2008. Retrieved September 2011, from:
http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/mcthods.htm
LeGrand, Harry E. Jr. (2007) Natural Areas Inventory of Person County, NC. NC Natural Heritage
Program, Raleigh NC.
NC Division of Mitigation Services. (2017). NC -DMS Annual Monitoring Report Format, Data
Requirements, and Content Guidance, June 2017. http://portal.ncdenr.orfz/web/eo/dbb-resources
Schafale, M.P., Weakley, A.S. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Third
Approximation. NC Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh, NC.
Sink, Larry T. (1995). Soil Survey of Person County, North Carolina. USDA Soil Conservation Service
(Natural Resources Conservation Service), Raleigh, NC.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2016. Web Soil
Survey. Available: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/a/app/
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County — Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

APPENDIX A. Project Background Data
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Attributes
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County — Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

kD
m a
�� I `M=0
�. = y� _ _ I- }fes=--' � - �• � _ � - 'y- _ � � , � �— -
f
r'
Tar River _
� i-i�.:8dwat�ers �41i;tigati€sn �Ik��
Wetland Restc�raiklcan'�I(lle (8 ac).. ��►, ,x p
1
-
To Rorxbo1•o ` Riparialia u"ffPr Oonrbectar Sl#e 17c �.°�;,• �' fr � a ,;� #^
i
S1 ream, Buffer . Nutrient Bank (18 acj
I
Hu
r ffHomelsiar- -
] I A� a� p /_�33BunnieHuffRd�r
Alf
� T1
I_" 4
�1� i�► � ,� `amu �� _ � T h�k4��
Triple Springs U$G8 Quadrangle,,`..
Moriah IJSIQS Quadrangles
Xford
. ditlJ e
/`# i r�i wE'j a` Er' eP� ' 'ti Gy'eight:Cs] 21113 Naon Ge�igraphicSocietyr o -cubed
u l
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map: Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site and related mitigation projects on the Huff Farm property, Person
County NC, Tar -Pamlico River HUC# 03020101-0102. DIRECTIONS: From US -158 in Berea, Granville County NC, turn right (northwest) on Old
Roxboro Rd, which becomes Denny Store Rd where it crosses into Person County. Turn right (north) on Bunnie Huff Rd, go 0.4 mile, and turn left
into the driveway just past the Huff Homeplace sign. Proceed through the gate at end of driveway to the project sites.

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site, DMS Project # 97071
Mitigation
Credits
Stream
Riparian
Wetland
Non -riparian
Wetland
Buffer
Nitrogen
Nutrient
Offset
Type
R RE
R RE
R RE
Acres
7.65
Credits
7.28L_+
TOTAL CREDITS
7.28
Project Components
Project Component
or Reach ID
Stationing/
Location
Existing
Footage or
Acreage
Approach
(PI, PII etc.)
Restoration or
Restoration
Equivalent
Restoration
Footage or
Acreage
Drained Wetland
-
6.53
Restore Hydrology,
Fence & Plant
R (Reestablish)
6.53 ac
Grazed Wetland
1.12
Fence & Plant
R (Rehabilitate)
1.12 ac
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Stream
tin. feet
Riparian Wetland
acres
Non -Riparian
Wetland acres
Buffer Upland
(sq. feet) (acres
Riverine Non-Riverine
Restoration
6.53 ac
Enhancement
1.12 ac
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
Creation
Preservation
High Quality Preservation
TOTAL feet or acres
-
- 7.65 ac
TOTAL WMU
-
- 7.28
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 10 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

Table 2. Project Activity & Reporting History
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site, DMS Project# 97071
Activity or Report Data Collection
Complete
Actual Completion or
Deliver
Mitigation Plan
Dec 16
Final Construction Plans
Dec 16
Construction
Jan 17
Planting
Feb 17
Baseline Monitoring/Report Feb 17
Apr 17
Year 1 Monitoring Nov 17
Dec 17
Year 2 Monitoring
Kenneth Strader: 336-314-2935
Year 3 Monitoring
KBS Earthworks, Greensboro NC
Year 4 Monitoring
Kory Strader & Brett Strader: 336-685-4339
Year 5 Monitoring
Mogensen Mitigation Inc, Charlotte NC
Planting Contractor
Rich Mogensen: 704-576-1111; Gerald Pottern: 919-556-8845
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site, DMS Project # 97071
Ecological Engineering, Raleigh NC
Designer
Heather Smith: 919-557-0929
KBS Earthworks, Greensboro NC
Construction Contractor
Kory Strader & Brett Strader: 336-685-4339
Michael T. Brandon, PLS, Roxboro NC
Survey Contractor
Michael Brandon: 336-597-8673
Strader Fencing, Inc., Julian NC
Fence Contractor
Kenneth Strader: 336-314-2935
KBS Earthworks, Greensboro NC
Herbicide and Seeding
Kory Strader & Brett Strader: 336-685-4339
Mogensen Mitigation Inc, Charlotte NC
Planting Contractor
Rich Mogensen: 704-576-1111; Gerald Pottern: 919-556-8845
Mellowmarsh Farms, Siler City NC
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Joanie McLean: 919-742-1200
Mogensen Mitigation Inc, Charlotte NC
Monitoring Performers
Rich Mogensen: 704-576-1111; Gerald Pottern: 919-556-8845
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 11 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

Table 4. Project Attributes
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site, DMS Project # 97071
Project Name
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site
County
Person County
Project Area (acres)
9.9 acres (Wetland + Buffer Easement combined)
Project Coordinates (lat. and long.)
36.3895, -78.8153
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Piedmont, Carolina Slate Belt
River Basin
Tar -Pamlico River -01
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit
DWQ Sub -basin
3020101 USGS Hydrologic Unit 12 -digit -0102
Tar -Pam -01
Project Drainage Area (acres)
60
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious
Area
0%
CGIA Land Use Classification
Pasture, Crop, and Deciduous Forest
Wetland Summary Information (Post -Restoration)
Parameters
Wetland Area
Size of Wetland (acres)
1.12 ac existing + 6.53 ac drained = 7.65 ac
Wetland Type (non -riparian, riparian riverine or
riparian non-riverine
Riparian non-riverine (Headwater)
Mapped Soil Series
Iredell Loam (IrB)
Drainage class
Iredell = moderately well; Hydric inclusions = poorly
Soil Hydric Status
Drained Hydric
Source of Hydrology
Shallow ponding; perched on shallow aquitard
Hydrologic Impairment
Drainage ditches (1940s)
Native vegetation community
Headwater depression wetland forest (prior to pasture conversion)
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
20% Fescue (sprayed)
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting
Documentation
Waters of the United States — Section 404
Yes
Yes
Prelim JD
Waters of the United States — Section 401
Yes
Yes
Prelim JD
Endangered Species Act
No
N/A
US FWS Letter
Historic Preservation Act
No
N/A
NC SHPO Letter
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)
Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA)
No
N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
No
N/A
NC Floodmaps Data
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A
N/A
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 12 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

APPENDIX B. Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Table 5. Vegetation Conditions Assessment
Figure 3. Vegetation Plot Photos
Figure 4. Photo Point Photos
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 13 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

A Air
`t 1 .. _. f-yW�:-r � - ^•,. r N ._`� N lfl�'ll'Iv ��f[=' ��1 rr. - / -
23 —-------— _ `L r t C(Old)
1 �� Ditch Plug (i 25
4, . • Y 'rye. :{ �«
flitch Plal I
Ditch Plus; i
22 Ditch Plug 3 -
Ditch I'lug 4 • B (Old)
4 26 B r
. v
20 �, r
�r
1 1 jr
�� 11 27
-
~, G —
D
4{ — � !�".�..r _ � � _ _ • r {ilii
`,�• « " �� � _ — �'��s� 'sat' �' � 's°iT" i '� � � g a
: - - ti .'rte j .as' a-"� ry _r• ' Legend
�r N -
: ,
the�
Wetland Rehabilitation (1.12 Ac) Vegetation Plots (Criteria Met) Fence is'V-12" outside,�
�I Conservation Ease`rrtvileent
u Wetland Reestablishment (6.64 Ac) Vegetation Plots (Criteria Not Met),6� �:.w
Not vtsible..due ta•scale •,� ,LY.. . _ �
GW Gauges - active 2017 (Criteria Met) Ditch Plugs ° ''i
• GW Gauges active - 2017 (Criteria Not Met) 1 _ _l Conservation Easement Feet
I KA RE
G11V Gauges (criteria NIA) Fence 0 50 100 200 300 400

Table 5: Vegetation Condition Assessment Table, MY-1 (2017)
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration #97071. Person County HUC #03020101-0102
Planted Acreage = 7.65
Mapping
Vegetation Problem Category
Definitions
Threshold
CCPV
Number of
Combined
% of Planted
(acres)
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material
0.1
N/A
0
0
0%
Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on
0.1
N/A
0
0
0%
MY3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria.
Total
0
0%
Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor *
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously
0.25
N/A
0
0
0%
small given the monitoring year.
Cumulative Total
0
0
0%
Easement Acreage = 9.98
Mapping
% of
Vegetation Problem Category
Definitions
Threshold
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Easement
(SF)
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map
1000
N/A
0
0
0%
scale).
Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map
none
N/A
0
0
0%
scale).
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 15 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

Figure 3. Vegetation Plots: Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -1 (Oct 2017)
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 16 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

Figure 3. Vegetation Plots: Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -1 (Oct 2017)
s
.. i��i'�w�'+'Y�e .a-ry•z.E� -fib �r .�_M �s • . ... _
i
4 �
fi 4
a '
IN �
CVS VeLPlot-23: MY -1 Fall 2017
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 17 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

Figure 3. Vegetation Plots: Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -1 (Oct 2017)
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 18 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

Figure 3. Vegetation Plots: Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -1 (Oct 2017)
t
I CVS VegPlot-27: MY -0 String 2017 1
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 19 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

Figure 3. Vegetation Plots: Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -1 (Oct 2017)
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 20 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

Figure 4. Photo Points: Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -1 (Oct 2017)
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 21 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

Figure 4. Photo Points: Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 MY -1 (Oct 2017)
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 22 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

APPENDIX C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 6. Vegetation Plot Success Summary
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Stem Count Data
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 23 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration (TRHWR) Project, DMS # 97071.
Monitoring Year 1 (Oct 2017) --Person County NC. Tar -Pam HUC# 03020101
Table 6. CVS Plot Stem Density and Success Summary
CVS Plot #
Wetland Planted
Stems
Planted + Volunteer
Stems
Invasive
Woody
Stems
Success
Criteria
Met?
per plot per acre
per plot per acre
97071-20
97071-21
97071-22
97071-23
97071-24
97071-25
97071-26
97071-27
97071-28
9 364
10 405
0
1 Yes
5 202
5 202
0
No
9 364
9 364
0
Yes
11 445
12 486
0
Yes
9 364
9 364
0
Yes
8 324
8 324
0
Yes
11 445
11 445
0
Yes
10 405
10 405
0
Yes
10 405
11 445
0
Yes
Project Avg
9.1 369
9.4 382
0
Yes
Success Criteria = 320 planted stems per acre at MY3, 260 planted stems per acre at
MYS, and 210 planted stems per acre at MY7.
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 24 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration (TRHWR) Project, DMS # 97071.
Monitoring Year 1 (Oct 2017) -- Person County NC. Tar -Pamlico HUC# 03020101-0102.
Table 7. CVS Plot Stem Counts and Density by Species.
Plant = Planted Stems; Total = Planted + Volunteer Stems
Color codes for Plot Density & Success
Exceeds criteria by 10% or more
Exceeds criteria by less than 10%
Fails criteria by less than 10%
Fails criteria by more than 10%
(352 or more)
(320-351)
(289-319)
(288 or less)
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 25 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI
Current Plot Data (MY1- Oct 2017)
Annual Means
Current Plot Data (MY1- Oct 2017)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Growth
Type
Scientific Name
Common Name
Growth
Type
97071-20
97071-21
97071-22
97071-23
97071-24 1
97071-25
Plant Total Plant Total Plant Total Plant Total Plant Total Plant Total
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree (P)
4
4
3
3
3
3
4
4
Tree (P)
2
Carpinus caroliniana
Musclewood
Tree (P)
6
6
6
6
Diospyros virginiana
Persimmon
Tree (P)
Diospyros virginiana
Persimmon
Tree (P)
2
2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Tree (P)
1
1
2
2
10
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Tree (P)
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tulip Poplar
1
1
3
3
2
2
1
1
6
12
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tulip Poplar
Tree (P)
3
3
1
1
0
0
1
1
Platanus occidentalis
Nyssa biflora
Swamp Blackgum
Tree (P)
1
1
5
5
5
5
Quercus bicolor
Swamp White Oak
Tree (P)
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
Tree (P)
2
2
3
2
2
3
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Tree (P)
Quercus bicolor
Swamp White Oak
Tree (P)
1
1
14
14
Quercus nigra
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Tree (P)
17
6
6
Ulmus americana
American Elm
Tree (P)
1
1
6
6
1
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
Tree (P)
10
(P) = planted species
Stem count
ares
acres
Species count
Stems per ACRE
11
1
1
3
3
2
2
7
7
Ulmus americana
American Elm
ITree (P)
0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.22 0.22 0.222
1
3 3 4 4 4 5 11 11 11
11
445 445 405 405 405 445 369 382 409
409
1
5
5
(P) = planted species
Stem count
ares
acres
Species count
Stems per ACRE
9
10
5
5
9
9
11
12
9
9
8
8
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1
0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025
0.025
3 4 3 31 41 4 5 6 4 4 2
2
1 3641 405 202 2021 3641 364 4451 4861 364 364 324
324
Plant = Planted Stems; Total = Planted + Volunteer Stems
Color codes for Plot Density & Success
Exceeds criteria by 10% or more
Exceeds criteria by less than 10%
Fails criteria by less than 10%
Fails criteria by more than 10%
(352 or more)
(320-351)
(289-319)
(288 or less)
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 25 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI
Current Plot Data (MY1- Oct 2017)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Growth
Type
97071-26
97071-27
97071-28
MY2(2018) MY1(2017)
MYO(2017)
Plant Total Plant Total Plant Total Plant Total Plant Total Plant Total
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree (P)
71
7
2
2
23
23
23
23
Carpinus caroliniana
Musclewood
Tree (P)
2
2
4
4
6
6
6
6
Diospyros virginiana
Persimmon
Tree (P)
0
0
2
2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Tree (P)
1
1
2
2
10
10
9
9
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tulip Poplar
Tree (P)
2
2
6
6
12
12
Nyssa biflora
Swamp Blackgum
Tree (P)
0
0
1
1
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
Tree (P)
1
1
5
5
5
5
Quercus bicolor
Swamp White Oak
Tree (P)
3
3
3
3
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Tree (P)
1
1
14
14
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
Tree (P)
2
2
2
2
17
17
6
6
Ulmus americana
American Elm
Tree (P)
6
6
1
11
14
10
10
(P) = planted species
Stem count
ares
acres
Species count
Stems per ACRE
11
11
10
10
10
11
82
85
91
91
1 1 1 1 1 1 9 9 9
9
0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.22 0.22 0.222
0.222
3 3 4 4 4 5 11 11 11
11
445 445 405 405 405 445 369 382 409
409
Plant = Planted Stems; Total = Planted + Volunteer Stems
Color codes for Plot Density & Success
Exceeds criteria by 10% or more
Exceeds criteria by less than 10%
Fails criteria by less than 10%
Fails criteria by more than 10%
(352 or more)
(320-351)
(289-319)
(288 or less)
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 25 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

APPENDIX D. Hydrologic Data
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Figure 5. Monthly Rainfall Plot with Percentiles
Figure 6. Groundwater Gauge and Rainfall Data
Table 8. Hydrologic Success Attainment
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 26 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

Figure 5. Monthly Rainfall Totals (2017) with 30th and 70th Percentiles.
From USDA WETS table, 30 -year historical data (1981-2010) at ROXBORO 7 ESE, NC
8
7
6
Month
Monthly Total
30th P*
70th P*
Jan -17
4.54
2.45
4.46
Feb -17
0.39
2.58
3.82
Mar -17
1.67
2.99
5.32
Apr -17
8.24
2.18
4.21
May -17
7.21
2.51
4.04
Jun -17
6.59
2.15
4.45
Jul -17
3.62
3.38
5.44
Aug -17
4.5
2.57
4.9
Sep -17
2.17
1.94
4.85
Oct -17
2.4
2.65
4.72
Nov -17
1.71
1.89
4.42
Dec -17
2.56
4.52
TRH Wetland Restoration Site
2017 Monthly Rainfall and 30 -yr Percentiles
a' 3
2
1
IN
Jan -17 Feb -17 Mar -17 Apr -17 May -17 Jun -17 Jul -17 Aug -17 Sep -17 Oct -17 Nov -17 Dec -17
Date
Rainfall 2017 30th Percentile 70th Percentile
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 27 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

Figure 6A. Groundwater Gauges and Rainfall Data Plots 2017 -- Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration # 97071
TRH Wetland Restoration Site Gauge 'A' -MY1 (2017)
60 i
40
d
L
c 20
L
CL
0
d
m
3
c -20
0
0
Q
40
-60
Jan -17 Feb -17 Mar -17 Apr -17 May -17 Jun -17 Jul -17 Aug -17 Sep -17 Oct -17 Nov -17 Dec -17
-Groundwater Depth (in) - --12Inches Below Surface - Precipitation(in)
60
40
a
c
c 20
a
a
0
a
3
c -20
0
40
-60
Jai
60
40
TRH Wetland Restoration Site Gauge'B' -MY1 (2017)
5
4.5
4
3.5
a
L
3 c
2.5 T
c
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
TRH Wetland Restoration Site Gauge 'C' -MY1 (2017)
5
-40
-60
Jan -17
Feb -17 Mar -17 Apr -17 May -17 Jun -17 Jul -17 Aug -17 Sep -17 Oct -17 Nov -17 Dec-17
-GroundwaterDepth(in) - --12Inches Below Surface - Precipitation(in)
4.5
4
3.5
v
L
3 c
2.5 w
m
2
1.5 c
1
0.5
0
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 28 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI
a
�
d
0
Y
m
Z
N
9
c
c
m
N
c
o
m
c
3
- - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
60
40
a
c
c 20
a
a
0
a
3
c -20
0
40
-60
Jai
60
40
TRH Wetland Restoration Site Gauge'B' -MY1 (2017)
5
4.5
4
3.5
a
L
3 c
2.5 T
c
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
TRH Wetland Restoration Site Gauge 'C' -MY1 (2017)
5
-40
-60
Jan -17
Feb -17 Mar -17 Apr -17 May -17 Jun -17 Jul -17 Aug -17 Sep -17 Oct -17 Nov -17 Dec-17
-GroundwaterDepth(in) - --12Inches Below Surface - Precipitation(in)
4.5
4
3.5
v
L
3 c
2.5 w
m
2
1.5 c
1
0.5
0
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 28 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

Figure 6B. Groundwater Gauges and Rainfall Data Plots 2017 -- Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration # 97071
60
40
TRH Wetland Restoration Site Gauge 'D' -MY1 (2017)
3
c -20
0
Q
40
-60
Jan -17
60
40
a
C
20
a
v
0
v
3
c -20
0
�7
40
-60
Ja
60
40
-40
Feb -17 Mar -17 Apr -17 May -17 Jun -17 Jul -17 Aug -17 Sep -17 Oct -17 Nov -17 Dec -17
-Groundwater Depth (in) - - -12 Inches Below Surface - Precipitation (in)
TRH Wetland Restoration Site Gauge'E' -MY1 (2017)
5
4.5
4
3.5
a
L
3 c
2.5 w
c
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
-60
Jan -17
TRH Wetland Restoration Site Gauge 'F' -MY1 (2017)
L
�
a
y
0
r
z
co
a
w
c
O
N
w
3c
.b
too
Nn.
3
- - - - -
- - - -
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P
- - - - - - - - -
-G�"
jll,flu JAh
Feb -17 Mar -17 Apr -17 May -17 Jun -17 Jul -17 Aug -17 Sep -17 Oct -17 Nov -17 Dec -17
-Groundwater Depth (in) - - - 12 Inches Below Surface - Precipitation (in)
5
4.5
4
3.5
a
L
3 c
2.5 m
c
2 z
1.5 0
1
0.5
0
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 29 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

Figure 6C. Groundwater Gauges and Rainfall Data Plots 2017 -- Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration # 97071
60
40
TRH Wetland Restoration Site Gauge 'G' -MY1 (2017)
3
c -20
0
Q
40
-60
Jan -17
60
40
a
C
E 20
a
v
0
v
3
c -20
0
�7
40
-60
Ja
60
40
-40
Feb -17 Mar -17 Apr -17 May -17 Jun -17 Jul -17 Aug -17 Sep -17 Oct -17 Nov -17 Dec -17
-Groundwater Depth (in) - - -12 Inches Below Surface - Precipitation (in)
TRH Wetland Restoration Site Gauge 'H' -MY1 (2017)
5
4.5
4
3.5
a
L
3 c
2.5 w
c
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
-60
Jan -17
TRH Wetland Restoration Site Gauge'I' -MY1 (2017)
L
a
0
r z
co c
c
N
O
m
c
w
N
�
3
Feb -17 Mar -17 Apr -17 May -17 Jun -17 Jul -17 Aug -17 Sep -17 Oct -17 Nov -17 Dec -17
-Groundwater Depth (in) - - - 12 Inches Below Surface - Precipitation (in)
5
4.5
4
3.5
a
L
3 c
2.5 m
c
2 z
1.5 0
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 30 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

Figure 6D. Groundwater Gauges and Rainfall Data Plots 2017 -- Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration # 97071
60
40
TRH Wetland Restoration Site Gauge'Y -MY1 (2017)
3
c -20
0
Q
40
-60
Jan -17
60
40
a
C
20
a
v
0
v
3
c -20
0
�7
40
-60
Ja
60
40
-40
Feb -17 Mar -17 Apr -17 May -17 Jun -17 Jul -17 Aug -17 Sep -17 Oct -17 Nov -17 Dec -17
-Groundwater Depth (in) - - -12 Inches Below Surface - Precipitation (in)
TRH Wetland Restoration Site Gauge'K' -MY1 (2017)
5
4.5
4
3.5
a
L
3 c
2.5 w
c
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
-60
Jan -17
TRH Wetland Restoration Site Gauge l'-MY1(2017)
L
a
0
r z
co c
c
N
O
m
c
w
N
3
- - - - - -
- - - - - - -
- - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - -
hA
Feb -17 Mar -17 Apr -17 May -17 Jun -17 Jul -17 Aug -17 Sep -17 Oct -17 Nov -17 Dec -17
-Groundwater Depth (in) - - - 12 Inches Below Surface - Precipitation (in)
5
4.5
4
3.5
a
L
3 c
2.5 m
c
2 z
1.5 0
1
0.5
0
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 31 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

Figure 6E. Groundwater Gauges and Rainfall Data Plots 2017 -- Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration # 97071
60
40
TRH Wetland Restoration REFERENCE Gauge -MY1 (2017)
3
c -20
0
Q
40
-60
Jan -17
Feb -17 Mar -17 Apr -17 May -17 Jun -17 Jul -17 Aug -17 Sep -17 Oct -17 Nov -17 Dec -17
-Groundwater Depth (in) - - -12 Inches Below Surface - Precipitation (in)
5
4.5
4
3.5
a
L
3 c
2.5 w
c
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 32 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC 03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI

Table 8. Hydrologic Success Attainment, Groundwater Wells
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Mitigation Site # 97071.
Mitigation Plan success criterion is 10% of growing season (consecutive days
< 12" below surface).
Growing Season based on USDA air temp data at Roxboso ESE gauge is Mar
28 to Nov 3 (221 Days).
Growing Season used here, based on on-site soil temperature > 41° F is Mar
1 to Nov 3 (248 Days).
10% of 248 -day growing season is 25 consecutive days.
I KI REF
1 4129 41155
14127 L a I
1+ �+ 40154 I
1 � 1
1 _
01 I
Reestablish �'I 1 6135
1 �
1. •-- .1 t 0 r 1
[ G 101297' I Cr
14125' —
1 1
r
Existing I a
Wetland I Q
F I
(Rehabilitation) 1 E r 4127 1
1 0 10136 `
j 7138 I 1
I �• 1 � F �
A
f " � r _1
0 1
I C
1j o +10133
0 '* B
1 [
�t713 a y
1 6133 t ,�
1 Reestablish t
X 1 Y: % growing season days with WT n -12"
X = % growing season by max consecutive days',
Y M % growing season by total number of days % •
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 33 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI
MY12017
Gage #
% Growing
Season
Monitored
Total # Days
WT < 12" from
surface
Max Consec
Days <12"
from surface
Success
Critera
Attained?
A
100%
82 (33%)
15 (6%)
No
D
100%
95 (38%)
17 (7%)
No
E
100%
89 (36%)
24 (10%)
Yes
F
100%
68 (27%)
11 (4%)
No
G
100%
63 (25%)
10 (4%)
No
H
48%
73 (29%)
24 (10%)
Yes
1
100%
87 (35%)
14 (6%)
No
1
100%
66 (27%)
11 (4%)
No
K
100%
71 (29%)
11 (4%)
No
L
100%
134 (54%)
100 (40%)
Yes
B
100%
95 (38%)
17 (7%)
NA
C
100%
81 (33%)
25 (10%)
NA
REF
100%
137 (55%)
101 (41%)
Yes
Mitigation Plan success criterion is 10% of growing season (consecutive days
< 12" below surface).
Growing Season based on USDA air temp data at Roxboso ESE gauge is Mar
28 to Nov 3 (221 Days).
Growing Season used here, based on on-site soil temperature > 41° F is Mar
1 to Nov 3 (248 Days).
10% of 248 -day growing season is 25 consecutive days.
I KI REF
1 4129 41155
14127 L a I
1+ �+ 40154 I
1 � 1
1 _
01 I
Reestablish �'I 1 6135
1 �
1. •-- .1 t 0 r 1
[ G 101297' I Cr
14125' —
1 1
r
Existing I a
Wetland I Q
F I
(Rehabilitation) 1 E r 4127 1
1 0 10136 `
j 7138 I 1
I �• 1 � F �
A
f " � r _1
0 1
I C
1j o +10133
0 '* B
1 [
�t713 a y
1 6133 t ,�
1 Reestablish t
X 1 Y: % growing season days with WT n -12"
X = % growing season by max consecutive days',
Y M % growing season by total number of days % •
Tar River Headwaters Wetland Restoration Site #97071 33 MY -1 (2017) Annual Monitoring Report
Person County - Tar -Pam HUC03020101 Mogensen Mitigation Inc. MMI