510107_Inspection Report_20181219

SU V/115 taif%D1aoi«
Division of Water Resources
Facility Number 31 - )0-7 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation .
0 Other Agency ,
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 5CStructure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint el Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:.;Itgl«S Arrival Time: �'r Q MI Departure Time:IIIMM County: b Region: QM
I
Farm Name: CafrO 1 LeP, MIMI Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address: y�
Physical Address: Q(Qy )3I aCtanal itcL
Facility Contact: Oh I Title: Huf\a q er Phone:
1� P Onsite Representative: S �`// Integrator: M—B
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder 1 Non-Layer Dairy Calf
IC Feeder to Finish 13 ja Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poult Ca 1 aci Po s. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish II Layers -- Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
Other •Turke Poults
Other I.Other -- , •
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes KI No ❑ NA E NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? E Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes gj No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number:,'SI - Date of Inspection: I74- jq I I g
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): [R
Observed Freeboard(in): 15-
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Ei No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes O. No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑•Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 121 NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA M NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 1'NE
El Excessive Ponding El Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground El Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
El PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
El Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes cg No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA RI NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA n.NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [:21'NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Ed'NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA .) NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA a NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
El Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis El Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes rg.No ❑._ A ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No TA ErNE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: S - (y) Date of Inspection:i
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ►' NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA R.NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [RNE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes st21'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes tgr No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Z.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes , ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 1No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Jjh 'ate,bocr . over r'MMsto , #Qeris b Cur ►�s 8cvb�lA. B r IMonc(c i M7
o� ��el w�
4 os rra Used a rob lo - were sem,
of �v�'I-�►� �`1-n4nci,ed
` ��'f' `rh lam meta--hrnelo so0I
0j tt ekirid c ron )rl r r� i
re. iC�IredA det dur'Yt of �� 7
��PtY�ktl G/1��J� rcir V � J � �il�i�Q�1N4'J srfath d " vaim - 1 road lD l7n tee_ �d
Ve �� clo3e All i es ar » a I�r ►^ef le -o�
r r>rled.b th►s ' Wh i called*noM��a,
>?21�`�"(� �� aCC�2Ss r0�a �Situ�'► � y
S all,q;-01 hus been Ocit)4e4t
b, hod �r��"rn uchl
lA ddRioidl n41e aboa, n fod uctreY7J,
gR�f 3-qGC&(Lea)
Reviewer/Inspector Name: To( Sal Phone: h/4Ql- 4. y(Of?f)
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 4dAraav, Date: bf'G IC/ (.)0
l'
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015