20181706 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20181213

DWR
IDIOM n of Water Resources
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.221784 -80.654211
FA. Processing Information U
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Mecklenburg
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
* Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
rJ Nationwide Permit (NWP)
F- Regional General Permit (RGP)
F Standard (IP)
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
tial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance
in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
G Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned *
Version#*
20181706
1
Is a payment required for this project?*
* No payment required
What amout is owed?*
* Fee received
r $240.00
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
r $570.00
Reviewing Office*
Select Project Reviewer*
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
Alan Johnson:eads\adjohnson1
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Lemmond Farm
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Jennifer Burdette
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail]
[phone]
Date Submitted
12/13/2018
Nearest Body of Water
McKee Creek
Basin
Yadkin-PeeDee
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.221784 -80.654211
FA. Processing Information U
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Mecklenburg
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
* Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
rJ Nationwide Permit (NWP)
F- Regional General Permit (RGP)
F Standard (IP)

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
F Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
F Individual Permit
29 - Residential Developments
1e. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
r 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
r Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
ALL 18030_Lemmond_NCDMSAccepta nce Ltr_2018-12-07. pdf
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
FB. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
F- Owner W Applicant (other than owner)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
81.55KB
r Yes r No
r Yes r No
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
JS Helms Family Properties, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
27206 & 839
2c. Responsible party:
Brian Helms
2d. Address
Street Address
11901 Albemarle Road
Address line 2
Qty
State / Rwince / Flegim
Charlotte
NC
Postal / Zip Cade
Country
28227
USA
2e. Telephone Number:
2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Chad Platt

3b. Business Name:
Alliance Realty Partners, LLC - Donald Santos, VP
3c. Address
Street Address
200 Providence Rd, Ste 250
Address Line 2
Qty
State / Rovince / Ibgion
Charlotte
NC
Postal / Zip Cade
Country
28207
USA
3d. Telephone Number:
3e. Fax Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
NA
1c. Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
11146103-5 &11146108-9
2c. Project Address
Street Address
11901 Albemarle Road
Address Line 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Cade
28227
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
McKee Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Yadkin -Pee Dee
3d. Please provide the 12 -digit HUC in which the project is located.
030401050302
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
70
State / Rovince / Flagion
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The property is an active horse/cattle farm With a single-family home, barns, pastures and hay fields located on the ridges and forested drainage ways. General land use in the vicinity
of the project consists of residential subdivision, forested areas, Interstate 485 and a medical office complex
Please refer to the attached USGS Location Map (Figure 1), Mecklenburg County Soil Survey Map (Figure 2) and
Aerial Site Map (Figure 3 - attached at the end of the application) for more information on the project setting.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
t'- Yes r No t'- Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
ALL18030 Figure 1 USGS Map.pdf
2.36MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
ALL18030 Figure 2 Soil Survey Map.pdf 1.88MB

4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.34
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
1,454
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project,*
The purpose of the project is to develop the property with the necessary infrastructure to provide suitable building areas for high density, single and multi -family home construction and
commercial lots to serve the current and future residents of the east Charlotte area.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The proposed project will be developed in two phases by separate entities. Alliance Realty Partners, LLC (Alliance) will be developing the first phase of the project. The second phase
of the project is proposed as a single-family development. This phase will be completed by the property owner or their designee. The first phase of project, which is the subject of this
application, consists of commercial lots along Albemarle Road and multi -family development including necessary infrastructure and residential amenities (community center including a
fitness center and pool and mail kiosk/pavilion).
Grading required to establish a contiguous footprint for the multi -family development would permanently impact the upper reach of an intermittent stream. A mail kiosk/pavilion
overlooking the pond would permanently impact a wetland area. Connecting the project to the sanitary sewer system requires a temporary impact to cross the stream channel that
bisects the property.
Typical construction equipment will be used consisting of front-end loaders, bulldozers, paving equipment, graders, and earth movers.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
ALL18030_Lemmond_lmpactMapCombined_2018-12-12.pdf 4.15MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
R Yes
Comments
f No
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
R Preliminary r- Approved C Not Verified r Unknown C NIA
Corps AID Number:
SAW -2018-01726
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Jennifer Burdette
Agency/Consultant Company: John R. McAdams Company
Other:
C Unknown
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
David Shaeffer with the USACE conducted a Feld visit to reviewthe jurisdictional delineation on October 19, 2018 and verified the stream and
wetland boundaries shown on the Verified Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Map provided as Figure 4 and project drawings provided in section 4.j. Documentation of the
preliminary jurisdictional determination has not yet been received.
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
ALL18030 Figure 4 Verified PJD Map.pdf 1.26MB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
F Yes C No
7b. If yes, explain.
Two separate entities will complete the project in two phases. The first phase consisting of a multi -family and commercial lot development is the subject of this application. Permanent
stream and wetland impacts for this phase are 154 linear feet and 0.02 acre, respectively. Single-family home development is planned for the second phase of the project, which will be
completed by property owners or their designee. A road crossing of the stream channel below the pond is anticipate to connect the multi -family portion of the property to the single-
family. This future road crossing will have a 65 -foot public right-of-way which is anticipated to require 140 linear feet of stream impact including the necessary fill slopes and riprap
dissipation. To minimize stream impacts, the future road is planned to cross the stream in the same location as the sanitary sewer crossing included in the first phase.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
A second Nationwide Permit 29 will be required to complete the second phase of the project. As summarized above, total permanent stream and wetland impacts are anticipated to be
under the threshold for a Nationwide Permit.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
W Wetlands W Streams -tributaries r Buffers
F Open Waters r Pond Construction

2. Wetland Impacts
2a1 Reason (?) 2b. Impact type * (?)2c. Type of W. 2d. W. name * 2e. Forested" 2f. Type of 2g. Impact
Jurisdicition*(?) area*
W1 Fill P Headwater Forest F (aka E) Yes Both 0.023
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.023
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.023
3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type* 3c. Type of impact* 3d. S. name* 3e. Stream Type * 3f. Type of 3g. S. width* 3h. Impact
(?) Jurisdiction* length*
S1
Multi -family lot fill
Y
Permanent
Fill
UT to McKee Creek
Intermittent
Both
3
Average (feet)
154
(linear feet)
S2
SS crossing
9
Tem orar
P Y
Excavation
UT to McKee Creek
Intermittent
Both
3
Average (feet)
44
(linear feet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts: 3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
154 44
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
198
3j. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The applicant requested a delineation of surface waters and wetlands prior to designing a site plan to avoid and minimize impacts to these resources
to the maximum extent practicable. Stream impact S1 involves filling 154 linear feet of the upper end of an intermittent stream channel. This impact is
required to create a contiguous footprint sufficient for mixed-use development. Stream impact S-2 is a sanitary sewer crossing that is necessary to
connect the mixed-use development to the sanitary sewer system. This crossing has been aligned to cross perpendicularly to minimize impact to the
stream channel. A steep valley and the alignment of the sanitary sewer make completing this crossing using the directional drill method impractical.
Wetland impact W-1 is necessary to situate a mail kiosk/pavilion to provide pond side recreation including potential storage of kayaks for use on the
pond.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
A Sediment and Erosion Control Plan for this phase of the project will be developed and approved by City of Charlotte, and the project will comply With
the supplementary NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit (NCG010000).
The sanitary sewer crossing will be constructed during no or lowflow, conditions to prevent the excavation from contacting flowing water.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
W DWR W Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
F Mitigation bank W Payment to in -lieu fee r Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
r Yes r No

4b. Stream mitigation requested:
(linear feet)
39
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
(square feet)
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
4h. Comments
4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
warm
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
49. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
Because stream impacts exceed 150 linear feet and the overall project would exceed this threshold, stream mitigation is required for the permanent
stream impact of 154 linear feet. A SAM assessment form and rating results for the stream impact labeled as S-1 is attached at the end of this
application. Although this portion of the received an overall rating of medium, this stream has been degraded by straightening and excavation. The
medium rating of this stream channel is primarily due to the presence of a forested buffer, which is highly impacted by invasive species (i.e. English
ivy, privet and nandina). Therefore, mitigation for this impact is proposed at a ratio of 0.25 to 1. The stream mitigation requested above is based on
this assessment and rounded up to the nearest foot.
6. Buffer mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWR
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? If yes, you must fill out this entire form - please contact DWR for more
information.
r Yes r No
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes
r No
If no, explain why:
The project is not located within an area that requires state protected riparian buffers.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater
program?
r Yes r No
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
W Local Government r State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
W Phase II r NSW r USMP F Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
Mecklenburg County
Comments:
The proposed development is located within the Yadkin-PeeDee River basin with stormwater runoff from the proposed development draining into
McKee Creek. Per Mecklenburg County regulations, stormwater management on this site shall meet the stormwater management performance standards for development set forth in
the Charlotte Post Construction Stormwater Ordinance. The proposed project will result in a significant increase in peak flow rates to downstream properties. To mitigate these impacts,
the proposed stormwater management facility has been sized such that post -development peak flow rates are no greater than pre -development levels in the 10-, and 25 -year storm
events on site. The proposed stormwater wet pond is designed as an "optimal efficiency" stormovater facility according to Chapter 4.3 of the Charlotte -Mecklenburg BMP Design Manual
(Revised July 1, 2013). The proposed stormwater facility will provide the required 85% TSS removal as well as the 70% total Phosphorus removal required in this watershed. If the
development on this tract is built as proposed within this report, then the requirements set forth in Mecklenburg County regulations will be met without additional stormwater
management facilities. However, modifications to the proposed development may require that this analysis be revised.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r' Yes
r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)

2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15ANCAC 2B.0200)?*
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r- Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project is a mixed-use development. It is not anticipated that this project will result in additional development beyond the second phase
that will require it's own Nationwide Permit and Water Quality Certification.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r- Nor N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated
at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
The project will be connected to the City of Charlotte sanitary sewer system.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
Sa. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r^ Yes r No r- Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut anytrees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
On July 24 and 26, 2018, McAdams requested a species list using US Fish and Wildlife (USFWS) IPaC online tool and potential occurrences
information from the NC Natural Heritage Program (NC NHP) for the project area, respectively. USFWS identified the following protected species that
may occur within the boundary of the proposed project and/or affected by the proposed project: Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis) — T,
Carolina Heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata) — E, Michau rs Sumac (Rhus michauxii) — E, Schweinitts Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitai) — E and
Smooth Coneflower (Echinacea laevigata) — E. NC NHP reported that there were no element occurrences of these species within one mile of the
project area. Bryon Hamstead was contacted regarding the survey requirements for these species. Mr. Hamstead indicated that surveys were not
required for Carolina heelsplitter and that the project occurs in location where any incidental take of Northern Long-eared Bat would be exempt under
its 4(d) rule.
Suitable habitat for Michaux's Sumac, Schweinitz's Sunflower and Smooth Coneflower is present around the pond on the site. Other open areas of the
property are regularly maintained as hay fields and pastures. On August 28, 2018, Jennifer Burdette with McAdams conducted a survey of the area
around the pond and didn't find any of above species present.
Consultation Documentation Upload
ALL18030 Lemmond Species List_ Asheville FWS 2018-07-24.pdf 277.7KB
ALL180301-emmond Farm NHP Ltr_2018-07-26.pdf 958.59KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
The Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Mapper (https://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper) was accessed on December 13, 2018.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)

7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
After McAdams' request for an environmental review of the proposed project, NC SHPO issued a letter on September 4, 2018 indicating that they are
aware of no historic resources that would be affected by the project.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
2018-09-04_ALL18030_Lemmond_SHPOResponseER18-1805.pdf 97.69KB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?*
f Yes r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NCFIRM Map Number 3710550400K; Map Revised 2/19/2014
NCFIRM Map Number 3710550300K; Map Revised 2/19/2014
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
ALL18030 Figure 3 Aerial Site Map.pdf 2.39MB
ALL18030_Lemmond_T2(B)SAM.pdf 259.46KB
Signature u'
*
W By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Jennifer Burdette
Signature
Sign
Date
12/13/2018

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham, NC / 919. 361. 5000 creating experiences through experience

All Blanks To Be Filled In By The Current Contract Purchaser
PIN(s): 11146103, 11146104, 11146105, 11146108 and 11146109
Name: Alliance Realty Partners, LLC
Address: 200 Providence Rd, Ste 250, Charlotte, NC 28207
Phone/Email: 772-530-2350/[e-mail]
Project Name: Lemmond Farm
Project Number: ALL-18030
Project Manager: Brandon Plunkett/Jennifer Burdette

Attn: David Shaeffer Attn: Karen Higgins
US Army Corps of Engineers NC Division of Water Resources
Asheville Regulatory Field Office 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 512 N. Salisbury Street
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Raleigh, NC 27604

Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I hereby designate and authorize The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. to act in my behalf as my agent in the
processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of applications, etc.
from this day forward.
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do authorize
representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and NC Division of Water Resources
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigation and issuing a
determination associated with Water of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act/Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 and/or Waters of State and/or Riparian Buffer Rules.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government officials to
enter the property when accompanied by The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. staff.

Donald Santos, Vice President
Print Contractor Purchaser Name & Title Signature

Date

Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS,AeroGRID , IGN, and the GIS User Community
0 250125Feet1 inch = 250 feet
$
LEGEND
Project Are a
FIGURE 3. AERIAL MAPLEMMOND FARMCHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH C AROLIN A
PR OJECT AREA
Y:\Projects\ALL\ALL-18030\Storm\Wetlands\GIS\ALL18030 Figure 3 Aerial Site Map.mxd, 7/24/2018 9:18:32 AM, burdette
7/24/2018
burdetteALL-18030DATE:JOB NO:DRAWN BY:
1VERSION:

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Office of Archives and History
Secretary Susi H. Hamilton Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

September 4, 2018

Jennifer Burdette
McAdams
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713

Re: Construct Mixed Use Development, Lemmond Farm, 11901 Albemarle Road, Charlotte,
Mecklenburg County, ER 18-1805

Dear Ms. Burdette:
Thank you for your letter of August 8, 2018, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.

The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.

Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
[e-mail]. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,

Ramona M. Bartos

0 250125Feet1 inch = 250 feet
$
LEGEND
Po ten tia l Tributarie s
Po ten tia l Po nds
Po ten tia l Wetla nds
Project Are a
2-ft C ontours
FIGURE 4. VERIFIED PRELIMINARY JURISDIC TIONAL DETERM INATION MAPLEMMOND FARMCHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH C AROLIN A
NOTES:1) Field work completed on July 30 and August 6, 20182) Jurisdictional limits were confirmed by David Shaeffer, USACE on October 19, 2018.3) Jurisdictional features have not been field surveyed by geomatics.4) Size and dimensional limits of all streams and wetlands are approximate.
PR OJECT AREA
Y:\Projects\ALL\ALL-18030\Storm\Wetlands\GIS\ALL18030 Figure 4 Verified PJD Map.mxd, 12/13/2018 9:42:24 AM, burdette
12/13/2018
burdetteALL-18030DATE:JOB NO:DRAWN BY:
1VERSION:
POTEN TIAL NONWETLAN DWATERS OF TH E USO1 (POND A) - +/-4.2 AC
POTEN TIAL NON-WETLANDWATERS OF TH E UST3 (C) - +/-102 LF
POTEN TIAL WETLANDWATERS OF TH E USW1 (A) - +/-0.15 AC
POTEN TIAL NON-WETLANDWATERS OF TH E UST1 (A) - +/-1,000 LF
POTEN TIAL WETLANDWATERS OF TH E USW3 (C) - +/-0.08 AC
POTEN TIAL WETLANDWATERS OF TH E USW4 (D) - +/-0.03 AC
POTEN TIAL WETLANDWATERS OF TH E USW5 (E) - +/-0.01 AC
POTEN TIAL WETLANDWATERS OF TH E USW2 (B) - +/-0.04 AC
POND A
POTEN TIAL NON-WETLANDWATERS OF TH E UST2 (B) - +/-352 LF
POTEN TIAL WETLANDWATERS OF TH E USW6 (F) - +/-0.03 AC

0 2,0001,000 Feet1 inch = 2,000 feet
$
FIGURE 2. NRCS SOIL SURVEYLEMMOND FARMCHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC
NOTES:1. USGS; SOIL SURVEY SH EET 8, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC2. LAT: 35.221784, LONG: -80.654211
Y:\Projects\ALL\ALL-18030\Storm\Wetlands\GIS\ALL18030 Figure 2 Soil Survey Map.mxd, 7/23/2018 4:58:41 PM, burdette
PR OJECT AREA
7/23/2018
burdetteALL-18030DATE:JOB NO:DRAWN BY:
1VERSION:
PaE Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent sl opesCeB2Cecil sandy cl ay loam, 2 to 8 percent sl opes, e rodedCeD2Cecil sandy cl ay loam, 8 to 15 pe rce nt slope s, erode d
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRC an,Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand),MapmyIndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS UserCommunity
0 2,0001,000 Feet1 inch = 2,000 feet
$
FIGURE 1. USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAPLEMMOND FARMCHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC
NOTES:1. USGS; 7.5 MINUTE, QUAD, MINT HILL, NORTH CAROLINA; 20162. LAT: 35.221784, LONG: -80.654211
7/23/2018
burdetteALL-18030DATE:JOB NO:DRAWN BY:
Y:\Projects\ALL\ALL-18030\Storm\Wetlands\GIS\ALL18030 Figure 1 USGS Map.mxd, 7/23/2018 4:09:46 PM, burdette
PR OJECT AREA
1VERSION:
NCNHDE-6556
July 26, 2018
Jennifer Burdette
John R. McAdams
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
RE: Lemmond Farm Mixed Use Development; ALL-18030
Dear Jennifer Burdette:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database, indicates that there are
no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas
within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there may be no documentation of natural
heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have
been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists.
In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may
update our records.
The attached ‘Potential Occurrences’ table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been
documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that
these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists. Tables of
natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one-mile radius of the project area, if any, are also
included in this report.
If a Federally-listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one-mile radius of the project
area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for guidance. Contact
information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project
review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the
NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP
data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature
Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund easement, or Federally-listed
species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Lemmond Farm Mixed Use Development
Project No. ALL-18030
July 26, 2018
NCNHDE-6556
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
Group
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last
Observation
Date
Element
Occurrence
Rank
Accuracy Federal
Status
State
Status
Global
Rank
State
Rank
Vascular Plant 13923 Acmispon helleri Carolina Birdfoot-trefoil 1951-08-22 H 3-Medium ---Special
Concern
Vulnerable
G5T3 S3
Vascular Plant 13743 Delphinium exaltatum Tall Larkspur 1800s Hi?5-Very
Low
---Endangered G3 S2
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
Sherman Branch Nature Preserve Mecklenburg County Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on July 26, 2018; source: NCNHP, Q3 July 2018. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Page 3 of 3
USACE AID #:NCDWR #:
PROJECT / SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any):2. Date of evaluation:
3. Applicant/owner name:
5. County:6. Nearest named water body
7. River Basin: on USGS 7.5-minute quad:
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach):
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map):10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet):
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet):Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet):13. Is assessment reach a swamp stream?Yes No
14. Feature type:Perennial flow Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM RATING INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone:Mountains (M)Piedmont (P)Inner Coastal Plain (I)Outer Coastal Plain (O)
16. Estimated geomorphic
valley shape (skip for a b
Tidal Marsh Stream):(more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope)(less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2)Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi2)Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi2)Size 4 (≥ 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated?Yes No If Yes, check all that appy to the assessment area.
Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters Water Supply Watershed (I II III IV V)
Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
Publicly owned property NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Anadromous fish 303(d) List CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
Designated Critical Habitat (list species):
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached?Yes No
1.Channel Water – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
A Water throughout assessment reach.
B No flow, water in pools only.
C No water in assessment reach.
2.Evidence of Flow Restriction – assessment reach metric
A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is adversely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impounded on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates).
B Not A
3.Feature Pattern – assessment reach metric
A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
B Not A.
4.Feature Longitudinal Profile – assessment reach metric
A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down-cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
B Not A
5.Signs of Active Instability – assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting (head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip-rap).
A < 10% of channel unstable
B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
C > 25% of channel unstable
6.Streamside Area Interaction – streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
A A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
B B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
C C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7.Water Quality Stressors – assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
0.33
4
NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
INSTRUCTIONS:Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs.Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic
quadrangle,and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation.If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same
property,identify and number all reaches on the attached map,and include a separate form for each reach.See the NC SAM User
Manual for detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if any supplementary
SAW-2018-01726
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
measurements were performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
Lemmond Farm 8/6/18 &10/19/18
35.221158 -80.652831
S-1 154
Alliance Realty Partners, LLC 4. Assessor name/organization:J. Burdette/McAdams
Mecklenburg
Yadkin-PeeDee McKee Creek
Check all that apply.
A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in the "Notes/Sketch"
section.
F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc.)
I Other:(explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
J Little to no stressors
8.Recent Weather – watershed metric
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
C No drought conditions
9 Large or Dangerous Stream – assessment reach metric
Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10.Natural In-stream Habitat Types – assessment reach metric
10a.Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b.Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)G Submerged aquatic vegetation
B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent H Low-tide refugia (pools)
vegetation I Sand bottom
C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
E Little or no habitat
11.Bedform and Substrate – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a.Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b.Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c.In riffles sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach – whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain Streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) =
absent, Rare (R) = present but ≤ 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 – 4096 mm)
Cobble (64 – 256 mm)
Gravel (2 – 64 mm)
Sand (.062 – 2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
Detritus
Artificial (rip-rap, concrete, etc.)
11d.Yes No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12.Aquatic Life – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a.Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water Other:
12b.Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check
all that apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to “individuals” for size 1 and 2 streams and “taxa” for size 3 and 4 streams.
Adult frogs
Aquatic reptiles
Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
Beetles (including water pennies)
Caddisfly larvae (Trichoptera [T])
Asian clam (Corbicula )
Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
Dipterans (true flies)
Mayfly larvae (Ephemeroptera [E])
Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
Midges/mosquito larvae
Mosquito fish (Gambusia ) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula )
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************Check for TidalMarsh Streamsonly
Other fish
Salamanders/tadpoles
Snails
Stonefly larvae (Plecoptera [P])
Tipulid larvae
Worms/leeches
13.Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and
upland runoff.
LB RB
A A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
B B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples include: ditches, fill,
soil, compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14.Streamside Area Water Storage – streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
A A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water ≥ 6 inches deep
B B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
C C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15.Wetland Presence – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the
normal wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
Y Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
N N
16.Baseflow Contributors – assessment reach metric (skip for size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
C Obstruction that passes some flow during low-flow periods within assessment area (beaver dam, bottom-release dam)
D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron oxidizing bacteria in water indicates seepage)
E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
F None of the above
17.Baseflow Detractors – assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
B Obstruction not passing flow during low flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
C Urban stream (≥ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
D Evidence that the stream-side area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
F None of the above
18.Shading – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider “leaf-on” condition.
A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19.Buffer Width – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider “vegetated buffer” and “wooded buffer” separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top
of bank out to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
A A A A ≥ 100-feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
B B B B From 50 to < 100-feet wide
C C C C From 30 to < 50-feet wide
D D D D From 10 to < 30-feet wide
E E E E < 10-feet wide or no trees
20.Buffer Structure – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Mature forest
B B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
D D Maintained shrubs
E E Little or no vegetation
21.Buffer Stressors – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
A A A A A A Row crops
B B B B B B Maintained turf
C C C C C C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
D D D D D D Pasture (active livestock use)
22.Stem Density – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Medium to high stem density
B B Low stem density
C C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23.Continuity of Vegetated Buffer – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10-feet wide.
LB RB
A A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
B B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24.Vegetative Composition – First 100 feet of streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes
to assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
A A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native
species, with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25.Conductivity – assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a.Yes No Was a conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. No Water Other:
25b.Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
A <46 B 46 to < 67 C 67 to < 79 D 79 to < 230 E ≥ 230
Notes/Sketch:
This section of stream appears to have been excavated and straightened. Multiple invasive species are present within the stream side buffer.
Meter unavailable
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
(1) Habitat
(2) In-stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
LOW
LOW
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
NA
NA
(2) Flood Flow
J. Burdette/McAdams
8/6/18 &10/19/18
YES
NO
YES
Intermittent
NA
LOW
LOW
LOW
(2) Baseflow
Stream Category Assessor Name/Organization
LOW
Pb1
Stream Site Name
LOW
NA
Lemmond Farm Date of Evaluation
LOW
NA
NA
MEDIUM
LOW
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
MEDIUM
NA
NA
HIGH
NA
MEDIUM
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
Function Class Rating Summary
(1) Hydrology
NA
HIGH
MEDIUM
HIGH
HIGH
MEDIUM
NO
NA
NA
LOW
HIGH
NO
NA
NA
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
LOW
HIGH
LOW
HIGH
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NA
LOW
LOW
Y:\Projects\ALL\ALL-18030\Land\Wetland Permitting\ALL18030-OA.dwg, 12/12/2018 1:33:07 PM, Lewis, Dylan
LEMMOND FARM
WETLAND EXHIBIT
ALBEMARLE ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA, 28227
PROJECT NO.ALL-18030
FILENAME
CHECKED BY BGP
DRAWN BY JDL
SCALE
DATE 12. 11. 2018
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
www.mcadamsco.com
phone [phone]
fax [phone]
license number: C-0293
3430 Toringdon Way
Suite 110Charlotte, NC 28277
PLAN INFORMATION
1"=250'GRAPHIC SCALE01252505001 inch = 250 ft.
Y:\Projects\ALL\ALL-18030\Land\Wetland Permitting\ALL18030-OA.dwg, 12/12/2018 1:36:10 PM, Lewis, Dylan
LEMMOND FARM
WETLAND EXHIBIT
ALBEMARLE ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA, 28227
PROJECT NO.ALL-18030
FILENAME
CHECKED BY BGP
DRAWN BY JDL
SCALE
DATE 12. 11. 2018
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
www.mcadamsco.com
phone [phone]
fax [phone]
license number: C-0293
3430 Toringdon Way
Suite 110Charlotte, NC 28277
PLAN INFORMATION
1"=250'
SEE

S
H
E
E
T

4
SEE

S
H
E
E
T

3
SEE

S
H
E
E
T

5
GRAPHIC SCALE2501 inch = 250 ft.···
Y:\Projects\ALL\ALL-18030\Land\Wetland Permitting\ALL18030-PLAN.dwg, 12/12/2018 1:38:29 PM, Lewis, DylanLEMMOND FARMWETLAND EXHIBITALBEMARLE ROADCHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA, 28227The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.www.mcadamsco.comphone 704. 527. 0800fax [phone]license number: C-02933430 Toringdon WaySuite 110Charlotte, NC 28277PROJECT NO.ALL-18030FILENAMECHECKED BYBGPDRAWN BYJDLSCALEDATE12. 11.2018PLAN INFORMATIONGRAPHIC SCALE
0 25 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.1"=50'
Y:\Projects\ALL\ALL-18030\Land\Wetland Permitting\ALL18030-PLAN.dwg, 12/12/2018 1:38:50 PM, Lewis, DylanLEMMOND FARMWETLAND EXHIBITALBEMARLE ROADCHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA, 28227The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.www.mcadamsco.comphone 704. 527. 0800fax [phone]license number: C-02933430 Toringdon WaySuite 110Charlotte, NC 28277PROJECT NO.ALL-18030FILENAMECHECKED BYBGPDRAWN BYJDLSCALEDATE12. 11.2018PLAN INFORMATIONGRAPHIC SCALE
0 25 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.1"=50'
Y:\Projects\ALL\ALL-18030\Land\Wetland Permitting\ALL18030-PLAN.dwg, 12/12/2018 1:39:12 PM, Lewis, DylanLEMMOND FARMWETLAND EXHIBITALBEMARLE ROADCHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA, 28227The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.www.mcadamsco.comphone 704. 527. 0800fax [phone]license number: C-02933430 Toringdon WaySuite 110Charlotte, NC 28277PROJECT NO.ALL-18030FILENAMECHECKED BYBGPDRAWN BYJDLSCALEDATE12. 11.2018PLAN INFORMATIONGRAPHIC SCALE
0 25 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.1"=50'