20190922 Ver 1_Draft Mitigation Plan 2018_20181213

ID#* 20171583
Select Reviewer:*
Mac Haupt
Initial Review
Completed Date
12/13/2018
Mitigation Project Submittal -12/13/2018
Version* 2
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site? *
Type of Mitigation Project:*
W Stream r Wetlands r Buffer r Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Andrea Eckardt
Project Information
Existing 20171583
(DWR) (nunbers only no dash)
I D#: *
Project Name: Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
County: Wilkes
Document Information
r Yes t: No
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Existing 2
Version: (nun-bersonly)
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plan
File Upload: Critcher Brothers Mitigation Plan-Draft_2018-12-
85.55MB
12.pdf
Rease upload only one RDF of the conplete file that needs to be subnitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Andrea Eckardt
Signature: *

MITIGATION PLAN
Draft for IRT Review

December 12, 2018
Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Wilkes County, NC

Yadkin River Basin
HUC 03040101

USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913

USACE Project Manager: Steve Kichefski

DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN

Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Wilkes County, NC

Yadkin River Basin
HUC 03040101

USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01913

PREPARED BY:

Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 S. Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Phone: [phone]

December 12, 2018

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page i December 12, 2018
Executive Summary
This Mitigation Plan has been prepared by Wildlands Engineering (Wildlands) for the Critcher Brothers
Mitigation Site (Site), part of the Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank. The Site is located in Wilkes
County within the Yadkin River Basin Hydrologic Unit 03040101. The Site was selected to provide stream
mitigation credits in the Yadkin River Basin 03040101 (Yadkin 01) service area. The project includes the
restoration, enhancement, and preservation of South Fork Fishing Creek, West Fork Fishing Creek, and
23 unnamed tributaries. This work is proposed to generate 20,891 cool stream mitigation credits.
The Site offers an important opportunity to improve streams and buffers on a long-standing cattle and
agricultural production farm.
This mitigation plan has been written in conformance with the Federal rule for compensatory mitigation
project sites as described in the Federal Register Title 33 Navigation and Navigable Waters Volume 3
Chapter 2 Section §332.8 paragraphs (c)(2) through (c) (14).

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page ii December 12, 2018
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ i
1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................1
2.0 Watershed Approach and Site Selection ...................................................................................1
3.0 Baseline and Existing Conditions ..............................................................................................2
3.1 Watershed .................................................................................................................................... 2
3.2 Existing Vegetation ....................................................................................................................... 4
3.3 Project Resources ......................................................................................................................... 4
4.0 Functional Uplift Potential ..................................................................................................... 12
4.1 Hydrology .................................................................................................................................... 12
4.2 Hydraulics ................................................................................................................................... 12
4.3 Channel Geomorphology ............................................................................................................ 13
4.4 Physiochemical ........................................................................................................................... 13
4.5 Biology ........................................................................................................................................ 13
5.0 Regulatory Considerations ..................................................................................................... 14
5.1 Waters of the US (401/404) ........................................................................................................ 14
5.2 Threatened and Endangered Species ......................................................................................... 15
5.3 FEMA Floodplain Compliance and Hydrologic Trespass ............................................................. 16
5.4 Cultural Resources / Conservation Lands / Natural Heritage Areas ........................................... 16
6.0 Mitigation Site Goals and Objectives ...................................................................................... 16
7.0 Design Approach and Mitigation Work Plan ........................................................................... 18
7.1 Design Approach Overview ........................................................................................................ 18
7.2 Reference Streams ...................................................................................................................... 18
7.3 Design Channel Morphological Parameters ............................................................................... 20
7.4 Design Discharge Analysis........................................................................................................... 20
7.5 Sediment Transport Analysis ...................................................................................................... 22
7.6 Project Implementation .............................................................................................................. 23
7.7 Vegetation and Planting Plan ..................................................................................................... 27
7.8 Invasive Vegetation Species Control Plan ................................................................................... 27
7.9 Site Constraints ........................................................................................................................... 30
7.10 Project Risk and Uncertainties .................................................................................................... 31
8.0 Site Protection Instrument ..................................................................................................... 31
9.0 Determination of Credits ....................................................................................................... 32
10.0 Credit Release Schedule ......................................................................................................... 37
10.1 Initial Allocation of Released Credits .......................................................................................... 37
10.2 Subsequent Credit Releases ....................................................................................................... 38
11.0 Performance Standards ......................................................................................................... 38
11.1 Streams ....................................................................................................................................... 38
11.2 Vegetation .................................................................................................................................. 39
11.3 Visual Assessments ..................................................................................................................... 39
12.0 Monitoring Plan .................................................................................................................... 39
12.1 Monitoring Components ............................................................................................................ 41
13.0 Adaptive Management and Maintenance Plan ....................................................................... 49
14.0 Long-Term Management Plan ................................................................................................ 50
14.1 Ownership and Long-Term Manager .......................................................................................... 50
14.2 Long-Term Management Activities ............................................................................................ 50
14.3 Funding Mechanism ................................................................................................................... 51
15.0 Financial Assurances .............................................................................................................. 52

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page iii December 12, 2018
16.0 References ............................................................................................................................ 54

TABLES
Table 1: Project Information ......................................................................................................................... 1
Table 2: Watershed Summary Information .................................................................................................. 2
Table 3: Floodplain Soil Types and Descriptions ........................................................................................... 3
Table 4: Project Site Streams ........................................................................................................................ 5
Table 5: Project Site Wetlands .................................................................................................................... 11
Table 6: Regulatory Considerations ............................................................................................................ 14
Table 7: Estimated Impacts to Project Wetlands ....................................................................................... 15
Table 8: Listed Threatened and Endangered Species in Wilkes County, NC .............................................. 15
Table 9: Mitigation Goals and Objectives ................................................................................................... 17
Table 10: Summary of Design Bankfull Discharge by Reach ....................................................................... 21
Table 11: Invasive Vegetation Treatment ................................................................................................... 28
Table 12: Summary of Site Internal Easement Crossings ........................................................................... 30
Table 13: Site Protection Instrument.......................................................................................................... 32
Table 14: Proposed Stream Mitigation Credits ........................................................................................... 32
Table 15: Credit Release Schedule - Stream Credits ................................................................................... 37
Table 16: Monitoring Plan .......................................................................................................................... 39
Table 17: Monitoring Components – South Fork Fishing Creek ................................................................. 42
Table 18: Monitoring Components – Critcher Tributaries ......................................................................... 43
Table 19: Monitoring Components – Antioch Tributaries .......................................................................... 44
Table 20: Monitoring Components – Chicken, Robin Hill, Oak Tributaries ................................................ 45
Table 21: Monitoring Components – West Fork Fishing Creek .................................................................. 46
Table 22: Monitoring Components – Magnolia, Shew Ridge, Ironwood, Timber Tributaries .................... 47
Table 23: Adaptive Management and Maintenance Plan .......................................................................... 49
Table 24: Long-term Management Plan ..................................................................................................... 50
Table 25: Management Funding ................................................................................................................. 52
Table 26: Financial Assurances Table ......................................................................................................... 53

FIGURES
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Service Area Map
Figure 3 NCDOT Draft STIP FY 2018-2027
Figure 4 Watershed Map
Figure 5 USGS Topographic Map
Figure 6 Soils Map
Figure 7A Existing Conditions Map- East
Figure 7B Existing Conditions Map- West
Figure 8 FEMA Floodplain Map
Figure 9A Concept Design Map- East
Figure 9B Concept Design Map- West
Figure 10A Monitoring Plan Map- East
Figure 10B Monitoring Plan Map- West

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page iv December 12, 2018
APPENDICES
Appendix 1 Site Protection Instrument
Appendix 2 DWR Stream Identification Forms
NC SAM Forms
Appendix 3 USACE Wetland Forms
Appendix 4 Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
Appendix 5 Agency Correspondence
Appendix 6 Supplementary Design Information
Morphological Parameter Tables (Existing Conditions, Reference Reaches, Proposed
Design Conditions)
Reference Reach Vicinity Map
Design Discharge overlaid with NC Regional Curve
Sediment Transport Capacity and Competency Summary Tables
Appendix 7 Photograph Log
Appendix 8 Financial Assurance Letter from UP2Save
Appendix 9 Preliminary Design Plans

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 1 December 12, 2018
1.0 Introduction
The Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank sites are located in Surry, Watauga, and Wilkes Counties, as
shown in Figure 1. The site described in this mitigation plan is the Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site (Site)
which is in Wilkes County within the Yadkin River Basin Hydrologic Unit (HU) 03040101060060 and the
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) Subbasin 03-07-01. The Site was selected to
provide stream mitigation credits in the Yadkin River Basin 03040101(Yadkin 01) service area (Figure 2).
Predicted future impacts in and around the service area are depicted in Figure 3. The project includes
the restoration, enhancement, and preservation South Fork (SF) Fishing Creek, West Fork (WF) Fishing
Creek, and 23 unnamed tributaries. This work is proposed to generate 20,891 cool stream mitigation
credits.
The bank sponsor is Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company operated by
member-manager Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands). The project attributes are shown in Table 1.
The Site Protection Instrument detailing the proposed conservation easement is discussed in Section 8.0
and the easement template is included in Appendix 1.
Table 1: Project Information
Project Name Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
County Wilkes
Project Area (acres) 72.6
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude) 36° 9' 52.70" N, 81° 2' 11.45" W
Planted Acreage (acres of woody stems to be planted) 59.2
2.0 Watershed Approach and Site Selection
The Site offers an important opportunity to improve streams and buffers on a long-standing cattle and
agricultural production farm and fulfill implementation of recommended activities to achieve high
priority goals recommended in several watershed and related planning documents detailed below.
The Site is located in the 03040101060060 14-digit Hydrologic Unit (HU). Although there is no Local
Watershed Plan that covers this sub-basin, the watershed is discussed in the 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee-
Dee River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) plan. The document indicates that the 03040101 basin
(Yadkin River Headwaters) is affected by habitat degradation with primary stressors including land
disturbing activities from agriculture/pasture, logging, and new home construction. The 2008 Yadkin
Pee-Dee River Basinwide Water Quality Plan indicates that fecal coliform bacteria concentrations often
exceeded 400 colonies/100ml in the Yadkin River Headwaters. A potential health risk exists with the
presence of fecal contamination for individuals exposed to this water. The Yadkin River basin is also
discussed in the 2015 North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission’s Wildlife Action Plan (WAP) where
excessive sedimentation and changes in hydrology and geomorphology, all due to urban development,
agriculture, and instream mining are noted as major issues in the basin.
This Site was selected because restoration, enhancement, and preservation of the streams on the Site
will directly address stressors identified in the RBRP. Stream banks will be stabilized and planted,
reducing sediment inputs to the streams. Aquatic habitats will be restored and riparian buffers will be
planted. Livestock which currently have access to streams on the eastern portion of the site will be
excluded from the easement. Riparian buffer areas will be planted with native riparian species and taken
out of agricultural crop production. Several stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) have been
proposed treat runoff from the adjacent agricultural landscape prior to it entering project streams.

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 2 December 12, 2018
These activities will reduce nutrient loading to the streams on site and to downstream waters through
reductions of livestock waste, agricultural fertilizers and pesticides, and sediment from the streams. In
sum, these activities will help to address water quality, habitat and hydrologic/geomorphic stressors
detailed in the various planning documents referenced.
3.0 Baseline and Existing Conditions
3.1 Watershed
The Site’s watershed (Table 2 and Figure 4) is located approximately 7 miles east of Wilkesboro in
southeast Wilkes County. It is situated in a rural area and the surrounding land cover is mostly woods
and farmland. The following section describes the existing conditions of the watershed.
Table 2: Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Piedmont
Ecoregion Northern Inner Piedmont
River Basin Yadkin River
USGS HUC (8 digit, 14 digit) 03040101, 03040101060060
NCDWR Sub-basin 03-07-01
Project Drainage Area (acres) 3,942
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area 2.3%
CGIA Land Use Classification
60% forested, 35% managed herbaceous, 2%
shrubland, <1% unmanaged herbaceous, 3 %
cultivated
3.1.1 Landscape Characteristics
Physiography and Topography
The Site is located in the Piedmont Physiographic Province of North Carolina. The Piedmont Province is
characterized by gently rolling, well rounded hills with long low ridges and elevations ranging from 300-
1,500 feet above sea level. The Site topography and relief are typical for the region, as illustrated in
Figure 5. SF Fishing Creek has a gently-sloped alluvial valley that ranges from unconfined to moderately
confined. Critcher Tributary, Antioch Tributary, Chicken Tributary, Robin Hill Tributary, and Oak Tributary
each have steep, confined valleys that widen at the downstream end as the streams enter the floodplain
of SF Fishing Creek.
On the western side of the site, WF Fishing Creek has a gently sloped alluvial valley with an unconfined
floodplain. Magnolia Tributary, Ironwood Tributary, Shew Ridge Tributary, and Timber Tributary have
steep and confined valleys that widen as they enter the flatter receiving floodplains of SF and WF Fishing
Creek.
Geology and Soils
The Site is located in the Inner Piedmont lithotectonic belt which consists of intrusive and metamorphic
rocks (NCGS, 1985). The underlying geology of the Site is mapped as late Proterozoic to Cambrian (1
billion to 500 million years in age) fine-grained biotite gneiss (CZbf), late Proterozoic to Cambrian biotite
gneiss and schist (CZbg), and Cambrian to Ordovician (455-540 million years in age) migmatitic granitic
rock (OCgm) (NCGS, 1985). The fine-grained biotite gneiss (CZbf) is strongly foliated with minor layers of
amphibolite and muscovite schist. The biotite gneiss and schist (CZbg) is described as inequigranular and
megacrystic with abundant potassic feldspar and garnet, interlayered and gradational with calc-silicate
rock, sillimantite-mica schist, mica schist, and amphibolite that contains small masses of granitic rock.

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 3 December 12, 2018
The migmatic granitic gneiss is foliated to massive, granitic to quartz dioritic, biotite gneiss and
amphibolite (NCGS, 1985).
Soil mapping units are based on the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey for Wilkes County. Soil types within the study area were
mapped with the NRCS Web Soil Survey and are described below in Table 3 and Figure 6. The project
area is dominated by Codorus loams, and Rhodhiss sandy loam, and Dan River and Comus soils. Codorus
loams are frequently floods flooded and is poorly drained, resulting in frequent occurrence of wetlands.
Table 3: Floodplain Soil Types and Descriptions
Soil Name Location Description
Codorus loam,
CoA
Mapped along the floodplain of SF Fishing
Creek, Chicken Tributary 1, and a portion
of WF Fishing Creek between Magnolia
and Ironwood tributaries.
Codorus loam soils are generally found on
floodplains. They are very deep (>80”), somewhat
poorly drained soils with moderate permeability.
Dan River and
Comus soils,
DaA
Mapped along SF Fishing Creek between
Antioch and Robin Hill Tributaries. Also
mapped along WF Fishing Creek
downstream of Ironwood Tributary and
continuing along SF Fishing Creek.
Dan River and Comus soils are generally found on
floodplains. They are very deep (>80”), well drained,
and moderately rapid permeable soils.
Fairview
sandy loam,
FaD
Mapped along portions of Ironwood,
Robin Hill, Critcher, Chicken 2 tributaries.
Fairview sandy loam soils are generally found on
moderately steep side slopes. They are very deep
(>80”), well drained, moderately permeable soils.
Fairview
sandy clay
loam, FcC2
Mapped along the upper portion of Robin
Hill Tributary A.
Fairview sandy clay loam soils are generally found on
steep side slopes and ridgetops. They are very deep
(>80”), well drained, moderately permeable soils.
Hatboro loam,
HaA
Mapped along lower portions of Critcher
Tributary and Critcher Tributary A.
Hatboro loam soils are generally found on floodplains
and depressions. They are very deep, poorly drained,
moderately permeable soils.
Rhodhiss fine
sandy loam,
RdE
Mapped throughout the project area,
predominantly along Timber, Shew Ridge,
Magnolia, Antioch, Critcher, Robin Hill,
and Chicken 1 tributaries. Also mapped
along portions of SF Fishing Creek.
Rhodhiss fine sandy loam soils are generally found on
steep hillslopes. They are very deep, well drained,
moderately permeable soils.
Source: Wilkes County Soil Survey, USDA-NRCS, http://efotg.nrcs.usda.gov
3.1.2 Land Use/Land Cover
Land use and land cover were investigated throughout the watershed using historical aerials from 1993-
2017 and a watershed reconnaissance survey. Additional historical aerials from 1950-2012 were
examined of the site and immediate adjacent parcels. On a larger watershed scale, the most notable
land use changes were from forested to open pasture land (less than 1% of the total watershed area)
between 1993-2017. For the last 30 years, the site and adjacent parcels have been used for livestock
grazing and maintained as managed herbaceous cover or forested land with only some change in the
Chicken Tributary 1 sub-watershed from forested to pasture land use.
Wildlands contacted the Wilkes County Planning department for information on projected land use
changes in the watershed. There are no short-term land use changes proposed at this time and no
impending development pressure to adversely impact the project (Scroggs, 2018).

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 4 December 12, 2018
3.2 Existing Vegetation
The riparian land use of the site include areas of open pasture, row crops, and forest with and without
cattle impacts. A large portion of the site is used for grazing cattle. Cattle have access to streams from
the upstream limits of SF Fishing Creek and associated tributaries up until Robin Hill tributary: primarily
the eastern half of the site. These areas include wooded areas as well as open pasture. The open
pastures are dominated by fescue grasses (Festuca spp.), broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus),
beefsteak (Perilla frutescens), and horsenettle (Solanum carolinense). The forested areas that have been
impacted by cattle include the wooded buffer along Reach 1 and 4 of SF Fishing Creek with mature trees
that primarily consist of white oak (Quercus alba), sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), river birch (Betula
nigra), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), red maple (Acer rubrum), umbrella magnolia (Magnolia
tripetala), black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia), and flowering dogwood (Cornus florida). The
groundcover along these reaches consists typically of wingstem (Verbesina alternifolia), beefsteak,
fescue, and Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum). Additionally, cattle have access to the wooded
buffer in the Antioch Tributary valley with canopy species consisting of American beech (Fagus
grandifolia) and tulip poplar community with other species including red maple, boxelder (Acer
negundo), black walnut (Juglans nigra), sycamore, and black tupelo (Nyssa sylvatica).
The riparian areas along SF Fishing Creek Reach 8 through 11 and WF Fishing Creek and its tributaries
include forest that have not been impacted by cattle. Adjacent to the forest areas, floodplain fields are
used for row crops adjacent to SF Fishing Creek downstream of the confluence with Robin Hill tributary
and WF Fishing Creek. Vegetation in the forested areas is primarily hardwood species including
sycamore, river birch, white oak, red oak (Quercus rubra), tulip poplar, red maple, American holly (Ilex
opaca), American beech, ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana), boxelder, umbrella magnolia with spicebush
(Lindera benzoin), rivercane (Arundinaria gigantea), and Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) in the
understory.
3.3 Project Resources
Wildlands investigated on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. within the proposed project easement
area following the USACE Routine On-Site Determination Method and NC Division of Water Resources
(DWR) Stream Identification methodology. All jurisdictional waters of the U.S. were located with GPS
capable of sub-meter accuracy. DWR Stream Identification Forms are included in Appendix 2. Wetlands
determination forms representative of on-site jurisdictional areas as well as non-jurisdictional upland
areas have been included in Appendices 3 and 4. Stream and wetland resources are described below.
3.3.1 Project Site Streams
The Site contains perennial and intermittent stream reaches as mapped on Figures 7A and 7B and
summarized in Table 4.
The North Carolina Stream Assessment Method (NC SAM) evaluation was performed on each project
reach that is proposed for stream restoration or stream enhancement I approach. The rapid assessment
methodology evaluates field conditions to generate qualitative function ratings (Low, Medium, High) for
the overall reach relative to reference conditions for the specific stream type. Project reaches proposed
for restoration scored as low functioning systems when compared to reference conditions due to
impairment to two or all three of the primary functions (habitat, hydrology, and water quality). Low-
scoring functions are the result of channel instability, cattle grazing, and managed buffers. Project
reaches proposed for enhancement generally exhibited less instability relative to restoration reaches
however reduced function was still evident. Enhancement reach overall ratings ranged from low to
medium. NC SAM Field Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets are enclosed in Appendix 2.

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 5 December 12, 2018
Table 4: Project Site Streams
Stream Reach
Length
of Reach
(LF)
Drainage
Area (ac)
Stream
Determination
NC DWR
Water
Quality
Classification
NC SAM
Rating
FEMA
Classification
SF Fishing Creek 8,625 3,942 P Class C Low Zone AE
Critcher Tributary 2,099 106 I/P Class C Low N/A
Critcher Tributary A 817 59 P Class C Low N/A
Critcher Tributary C 120 2 P Class C Low N/A
Critcher Tributary D 106 5 I Class C Low N/A
Antioch Tributary 1,738 66 I/P Class C Low N/A
Antioch Tributary A 943 20 P Class C Low N/A
Antioch Tributary A1 177 7 I/P Class C N/A N/A
Antioch Tributary B 867 24 P Class C Low N/A
Antioch Tributary B1 440 5 P Class C N/A N/A
Antioch Tributary C 113 1 I Class C N/A N/A
Chicken Tributary 1 1,591 444 P Class C Low N/A
Chicken Tributary 1A 1,076 19 I/P Class C N/A N/A
Chicken Tributary 2 79 5 I Class C N/A N/A
Robin Hill Tributary 1,183 24 P Class C Low/
Medium N/A
Robin Hill Tributary A 158 4 I/P Class C Low N/A
Robin Hill Tributary B 259 3 P Class C Medium N/A
Oak Tributary 493 24 P Class C Medium N/A
WF Fishing Creek 3,443 2,167 P Class C Low/
Medium N/A
Magnolia Tributary 1,317 202 P Class C Medium N/A
Shew Ridge Tributary 1,175 69 P Class C Low N/A
Shew Ridge Tributary A 446 15 P Class C N/A N/A
Ironwood Tributary 769 19 I/P Class C Low N/A
Timber Tributary 2,184 49 P Class C Low N/A
Timber Tributary A 106 4 I Class C N/A N/A

SF Fishing Creek

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 6 December 12, 2018
SF (SF) Fishing Creek flows north onto the project site and continues generally in a northwest direction
across the site. At the upstream portion of SF Fishing Creek, Reach 1 consists of stable stream banks
with a narrow, mature wooded buffer along
both banks. Continuing downstream, the
channel pattern becomes more sinuous in
Reaches 2 and 3, with actively eroding banks
from cattle trampling and limited stabilizing
woody vegetation with significant recent
avulsion episodes are evident as oxbow
meander scars. Reach 4 begins at a bedrock
outcrop, and occupies a narrow, step valley
with stable bedform and coarser substrate in
the riffles and an established riparian buffer
stabilizing the stream banks. Reach 4 ends just
downstream of an existing crossing. Reach 5
begins as a short unstable section of stream
with no woody buffer between the bridge and
confluence with Antioch Tributary. Reach 5
then turns to the west, flowing out of the
narrow, steep valley into a broad, open
floodplain used as a cattle pasture, and paralleled by a farm road on the left bank. Reach 5 has a
representative bank height ratio of 3.0 and is overly wide with depositional bars and fining in the riffles.
Reach 6 begins at the confluence with Chicken Tributary 1 and Reach 7 begins at the confluence with
Chicken Tributary 2. Reaches 6 and 7 are defined by extensive stream erosion and trampled banks. The
Robin Hill Tributary confluence marks the Reach 7/Reach 8 break. Reach 8 is fenced to exclude cattle but
it is still actively eroding. A small row crop field is maintained in the left riparian area. A poorly
maintained culvert crossing marks the break between Reach 8 and Reach 9. Reach 9 flows through a
confined valley with stable stream banks and boulder and cobble dominated bedform. There is a steep
hillside with mature forest along the left bank and an actively used farm road along the right bank.
Reach 10 begins where the right floodplain widens. Bank erosion increases in Reach 10 and this reach
has a representative bank height ratio of 1.8. The Reach 10/Reach 11 break is at SF Fishing Creek’s
confluence with WF Fishing Creek. The drainage area of Reach 11 is almost twice that of Reach 10.
Reach 11’s riparian buffer consists of a narrow band of woody vegetation with row crops beyond. The
stream is incised as evidenced by a bank height ratio of 2.0 with active erosion along the outer meander
bends of the channel.
Critcher Tributary
Critcher Tributary originates in an open cattle pasture on the eastern side of the project site and flows
into SF Fishing Creek. A breached earthen dam is present in the headwaters of Critcher Tributary, and
fine sediment eroded from the breached dam has deposited throughout the tributary. Based on aerial
imagery, the pond appears to have been breached between 1998 and 2005. There is limited channel
bedform diversity with mostly sandy runs and some small gravel riffles. Most of Critcher Tributary is
incised and eroded with active cattle trails along both banks. Reaches 3 and 4 have bank height ratios of
2.7 to 3.8. The riparian buffer consists of scattered mature trees along the banks with actively grazed
cattle pasture drained by active rills and gullies.
Critcher Tributary A
Reach 5 flowing west along farm road

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 7 December 12, 2018
Critcher Tributary A flows onto the project site
from the east to join Critcher Tributary. The
upstream half of this channel is in a wooded area
while the downstream half flows through an open,
herbaceous pasture. This upstream half of this
tributary has good bedform and varied substrate
including a mix of sands, gravels, and some
cobbles. While there is erosion present
throughout Critcher Tributary A, the stream is
more incised in the open pasture with bank height
ratio ranging from 3.7 to 5.3.
Critcher Tributary C
Critcher Tributary C originates within the project
limits at a 20-foot headcut within open pasture
and flows downstream to join Critcher Tributary
downstream of the breached pond dam. This
small channel is deeply incised with eroding banks with a bank height ratio exceeding 5.0. The stream
has been extensively trampled by cattle, especially near the confluence with Critcher Tributary.
Critcher Tributary D
Critcher Tributary D is a small, intermittent channel that is incised (BHR 3.9) and has been trampled by
cattle with bedform that consists of fine sand and clay hardpan. The short channel flows through
pasture and the buffer is vegetated with grasses. The upland area is heavily used pasture with rills
evident.
Antioch Tributary
Antioch Tributary begins on the
east side of the project site and
flows in the southwest direction
into SF Fishing Creek Reach 5. The
left riparian area is mostly
wooded while the right side of
valley is predominantly open,
herbaceous pasture with few
trees along the bank. Much of the
bedform has been trampled by
cattle and the substrate consists
of mostly sand and silty clay.
Erosional side gullies are present,
especially along the upper portion
of this tributary. Bank height
ratios range from 3.5 to more
than 5.0. Approximately 50 linear
feet upstream of the SF Fishing
Creek confluence, the channel flows through a 24” CMP culverted cattle crossing.
The Antioch Tributary and each of its headwater channel systems showed evidence of ongoing current
cattle access at each field visit during the design phase of the project. Bed and bank tramping and fresh
cattle fecal waste was observed in the beds and floodplains.
Critcher Tributaries
Proposed
BMP site
Tribs
A&A1
Tributary C and
Antioch Mainstem
Tribs
B&B1
SF Fishing Creek
Antioch Tributary and Sub-drainages
Tributary C, D, and
Critcher Mainstem

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 8 December 12, 2018
Antioch Tributary A
Antioch Tributary A flows from the north into the site from an area that was recently timbered. The
stream continues through a partially wooded buffer where cattle have access to the stream and have
trampled the banks. Antioch Tributary A leaves the partially wooded buffer and enters the pasture just
upstream of its confluence with Antioch Tributary. Within the pasture, Antioch Tributary A is eroded and
incised with a bank height ration of 2.9.
Antioch Tributary A1
Antioch Tributary A1 begins as an intermittent channel at a headcut at the property boundary. The
stream transitions to a perennial channel within the site and flows into Antioch Tributary A. The
headwaters appear to have been recently timbered.
Antioch Tributary B
Antioch Tributary B originates onsite and flows in a westward direction in a confined valley until it joins
Antioch Tributary. Much of the channel is incised with a
bank height ratio of more than 5.0 and with areas of
bank erosion. The riparian area consists of an
established wooded buffer along both banks.
Antioch Tributary B1
Antioch Tributary B1 is the southern branch of Antioch
Tributary B and flows in a northwest direction through
a wooded confined valley. Antioch Tributary B1 is a
perennial channel that becomes increasingly incised in
the downstream direction.
Antioch Tributary C
Antioch Tributary C begins at a small, 1-foot headcut
seep and continues as an intermittent channel until it
flows into Antioch Tributary. The buffer is wooded
along both banks with cattle access to the entire reach.
Chicken Tributary 1
Chicken Tributary 1 flows onto the project site and
continues in a northward direction into SF Fishing Creek. The upper reach begins with localized erosion
along the right bank due to cattle access and debris in the stream. The remaining upper half of this
channel is generally in good condition with diverse bedform and wooded riparian buffer along both
banks. After the confluence with Chicken Tributary 1A, a partial wooded buffer remains along the left
bank and the channel narrows with more widespread erosion and incision. Bank height ratio along this
reach was measured at 1.8. Cattle have access to the entire project stream and have trampled banks
especially along the lower half of the stream.
Chicken Tributary 1A
Chicken Tributary 1A begins as an intermittent channel below a small rock slide and transitions to a
perennial channel below a 2-foot debris jam. Riffle step-pool structures are common throughout the
perennial portion of the stream. This stream flows in a northeastward direction through a confined,
wooded valley before joining Chicken Tributary 1.
Chicken Tributary 2
Chicken Tributary 2 is an intermittent stream that originates at a 3-foot headcut and flows
approximately 80 feet through cattle pasture before joining SF Fishing Creek. The entire reach is incised
and actively eroding, and cattle have trampled the banks.
Gullies, Cattle Trampling and Incised Banks –
Antioch Tributary below Tributary C
confluence

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 9 December 12, 2018
Robin Hill Tributary
Robin Hill Tributary begins at a 5-foot headcut and continues in a northeast direction to join SF Fishing
Creek. An erosional ephemeral gully continues upslope of the headcut into the pasture. The left side of
Robin Hill Tributary’s valley is an established wooded area while the right side has only a narrow
wooded buffer on the steep slope with open pasture beyond. The upper two thirds of the stream has
some bedform diversity with a mix of sand, gravel, and some cobble substrate. This perennial channel
has erosion throughout and becomes more incised along the lower third where fine sediment is more
common. Representative bank height ratio is 3.1.
Robin Hill Tributary A
Robin Hill Tributary A originates as an intermittent channel downstream of a 3-foot headcut and
transitions to perennial with more defined geomorphology before flowing into Robin Hill Tributary.
Most of the channel is incised with bank erosion and has an established wooded riparian buffer. A
representative bank height ratio was measured at more than 5.0.
Robin Hill Tributary B
Robin Hill Tributary B begins downstream of a 6-foot headcut and flows into Robin Hill Tributary. There
is a wooded riparian buffer with unstable eroding banks on the lower half of this perennial reach. A
representative bank height ratio was measured at more than 5.0.
Oak Tributary
Oak Tributary flows through an established forested area downstream of a power utility easement. The
stream is incised and eroded. The stream has a short, stable section about mid reach but becomes
incised as the stream enters the SF Fishing Creek floodplain.
WF Fishing Creek
West Fork (WF) Fishing Creek flows onto the
project site and continues in an eastward
direction into the lower portion of SF Fishing
Creek. The riparian area is characterized by
a steep mature forest along the right bank
and a narrow line of trees along the left
bank with row crops. The channel is
moderately sinuous with diverse bedform
and some larger cobble substrate in the
riffles. Incision is present especially
throughout the upper third of the stream
and erosion along the outer bends of the
channel. Bank height ratios were measured
in the 1.6 to 2.5 range.
Magnolia Tributary
Magnolia Tributary flows onto the site
through a culvert at the top of the reach and continues in a northward direction before joining WF
Fishing Creek just outside of the project boundary. The upper portion of this tributary is stable with
good aquatic habitat and a native forested buffer. Magnolia Tributary loses stability and exhibits eroding
banks when the right riparian area transitions to cattle pasture. Reach 2 of Magnolia Tributary has a
bank height ratio of 2.1.
Shew Ridge Tributary and Shew Ridge Tributary A
Confluence of WF Fishing Creek and SF Fishing Creek

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 10 December 12, 2018
Shew Ridge Tributary flows onto the site in a steep established forested valley and continues generally
in a southeast direction into WF Fishing Creek. Shew Ridge Tributary A is a short perennial channel that
begins onsite and joins the mainstem near the
property line. Downstream of this confluence, the
channel has good bedform diversity and a section of
bedrock slide. At the lower portion of the stream, the
channel profile becomes less steep and is somewhat
unstable with localized bank erosion. Shew Ridge
Tributary Reach 2 has a bank height ratio of 2.0.
Ironwood Tributary
Ironwood Tributary starts onsite just downslope from
open cattle pasture, within a wooded valley. This
steep channel continues in a northwest direction with
erosion and incision present throughout the majority
of the reach, with bank height ratio more than 5.0.
The tributary gains stability with bedrock bedform and low stream banks just upstream of its confluence
with WF Fishing Creek.
Timber Tributary and Timber Tributary A
Timber Tributary is a steep perennial channel within a large mature forest valley. Timber Tributary A is a
short, intermittent channel with weak bedform
structures and flows from the west to join the
mainstem in the upper portion of the watershed. At
the lower reach of Timber Tributary, the channel
becomes deeply incised (bank height ratio 2.6) with row crops abutting both banks before the
confluence with WF Fishing Creek.
3.3.2 Project Site Wetlands
The wetland delineation resulted in 26 existing jurisdictional wetland features within or immediately
adjacent to the project area. (Wetlands A – AA, no Wetland X). Refer to figures in Appendix 4 for the
preliminary JD containing a map of wetland locations. The jurisdictional wetland features are classified
as bottomland hardwood forest, headwater forest, and seeps using the North Carolina Wetland
Assessment Method (NCWAM) classification key and the evaluator’s best professional judgement. The
wetlands occur on the side slopes and the floodplains that drain to on-site stream channels. These
features exhibit one or more of the following wetland hydrology indicators: high water table, pockets of
shallow inundation, saturation within the upper 12 inches of the soil profile, drift deposits, iron deposits,
and water-stained leaves. Soils within on-site wetlands have a low chroma (depleted) matrix. Common
hydrophytic vegetation includes American sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), and common rush (Juncus
effuses), and shallow sedge (Carex lurida). Most of these areas experience significant impacts from
livestock grazing. Many of these small wetland features will be improved through fencing out livestock
and planting. However, no wetland credits are proposed for this site. Wetland determination forms are
in Appendix 3 and wetland features are summarized in Table 5.

Excessive bank height ratios and erosion in
meander bends in Shew Ridge Reach 2

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 11 December 12, 2018
Table 5: Project Site Wetlands
Parameter A B C D E F
Size of Wetland (acres) 0.01 <0.01 0.02 0.02 0.17 0.13
Wetland Type (non-riparian, riparian
riverine or riparian non-riverine) Riparian Non-Riverine
Mapped Soil Series Rhodhiss Codorus
Drainage Class Well Drained Somewhat Poorly Drained
Soil Hydric Status No No
Source of Hydrology Groundwater Groundwater/Overbank flooding
Restoration or enhancement
method (hydrologic, vegetative, etc) N/A
Parameter G H I J K L
Size of Wetland (acres) 0.13 0.05 0.06 0.02 0.07 0.04
Wetland Type (non-riparian, riparian
riverine or riparian non-riverine) Riparian Non-Riverine
Mapped Soil Series Codorus Rhodhiss
Drainage Class Somewhat Poorly Drained Well Drained
Soil Hydric Status No No
Source of Hydrology Groundwater/ Overbank
flooding Groundwater
Restoration or enhancement
method (hydrologic, vegetative, etc) N/A
Parameter M N O P Q R
Size of Wetland (acres) 0.01 0.05 0.15 0.21 0.04 0.09
Wetland Type (non-riparian, riparian
riverine or riparian non-riverine) Riparian Non-Riverine
Mapped Soil Series Rhodhiss Codorus Dan River and
Comus/Rhodhiss Fairview Rhodhiss
Drainage Class Well
Drained
Somewhat
Poorly
Drained
Well Drained
Soil Hydric Status No
Source of Hydrology Groundwater Groundwater/ Overbank
flooding Groundwater
Restoration or enhancement
method (hydrologic, vegetative, etc) N/A
Parameter S T U V W Y
Size of Wetland (acres) 0.02 0.01 <0.01 0.03 0.08 0.02
Wetland Type (non-riparian, riparian
riverine or riparian non-riverine)
Riparian
Non-
Riverine
Non-
Riparian Riparian Non-Riverine Non-
Riparian
Mapped Soil Series Rhodhiss Fairview/
Rhodhiss Rhodhiss
Drainage Class Well Drained
Soil Hydric Status No
Source of Hydrology Groundwater
Restoration or enhancement
method (hydrologic, vegetative, etc)
N/A

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 12 December 12, 2018
Parameter Z AA
Size of Wetland (acres) 0.01 0.02
Wetland Type (non-riparian, riparian
riverine or riparian non-riverine) Non-Riparian
Mapped Soil Series Rhodhiss
Drainage Class Well Drained
Soil Hydric Status No
Source of Hydrology Groundwater
Restoration or enhancement
method (hydrologic, vegetative, etc) N/A

4.0 Functional Uplift Potential
The potential for functional uplift is described in this section according to the terms described by the
Stream Functions Pyramid (Harman, et al., 2012). The Stream Functions Pyramid describes a hierarchy of
five stream functions, each of which supports the functions above it on the pyramid (and sometimes
reinforces those below it). The five functions in order from bottom to top are hydrology, hydraulics,
geomorphology, physicochemical, and biology. Each of these functions is described below.
4.1 Hydrology
The major hydrologic disturbance has been deforestation of slightly over 40% of the project watershed,
most of which has been converted to agricultural land uses. These alterations in land cover typically
result in reductions in rainfall interception and evapotranspiration which lead to increases in runoff and
water yield (Dunne and Leopold, 1978). Over large areas, these types of changes result in an increase in
both peak flows and base flows. However, initial increases in water yield usually change over time as
vegetation regrows and crops are planted. There are no stream gages within this watershed and,
thus,no way to know the degree to which clearing of 40% of the land affected this particular stream
system. In a small watershed such as this, the effects may be minimal. In addition, whatever effect the
clearing had on watershed hydrology occurred several decades ago and additional clearing in the
watershed has been limited. The watershed has adjusted to its hydrologic regime. Population growth in
this rural area is currently slow. Therefore, future alteration to the land cover and associated effects on
hydrology are not expected in the foreseeable future.
A stream restoration project performed at a specific site does not often result in uplift to hydrology
(Harman, 2012). This applies to project streams that do not originate on site including SF Fishing Creek,
WF Fishing Creek, and Chicken Tributary 1. Even though trees will be planted within the conservation
easement, this will not significantly improve the rainfall-runoff relationship for the watershed.
Therefore, there is no opportunity for this project to improve the hydrology function for these reaches.
However, approximately 44% of the project is occurring in headwater streams, so the watershed land
use directly adjacent to these reaches will be shifted from agriculture to forest as part of the project.
The enhancement to vegetation will result in hydrologic benefits in those sub-watersheds.
4.2 Hydraulics
Many streams on the site are enlarged and incised and, therefore, flows higher than the bankfull
discharge are contained within the channel and result in excessive velocity which adversely affects
geomorphology and habitat. This has resulted in reduced hydraulic functioning of the channels as
described by Harman, et al. (2012). The restored stream channels will be reconnected to adjacent
floodplains and flood benches. In lower slope E- and C-type channels, where floodplain relief is a critical

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 13 December 12, 2018
element to stream hydraulics and stability, appropriate floodplain widths (entrenchment ratios) will be
designed to support the reduction of in-channel velocities during flooding and there-by maintain a more
stable morphology. In the steeper, headwater channels, channels will be raised or floodplain benching
will be excavated in order to achieve entrenchment ratios which result in stable step-pool morphology.
The bank height ratios for all restoration reaches, and all EI reaches where new channels are
constructed, will be 1.0 to 1.1 which will facilitate the hydraulic benefits discussed above. Bank height
ratios will generally not be changed on EII reaches since these channels are typically hydraulically stable
or trending towards stability.
4.3 Channel Geomorphology
The past and on-going incision and widening places streams on the site at Stage III-IV of the Simon
Channel Evolution Model and have a long and environmentally detrimental course to run prior to
achieving a new quasi equilibrium. In addition, cattle access to the stream reaches on the eastern
portion of the site are a contributing factor to bed and bank instability. There is little to no large woody
debris (LWD) in any of the streams on site and many of the streams lack streamside vegetation, both
contributing to a lack of channel roughness which adversely impacts geomorphic channel stability and
habitat complexity and diversity.
There is a significant opportunity to improve the geomorphology on the site through the same activities
described under hydraulics. In addition, LWD will be added to the system through construction of
instream log structures and bank revetments, and riffles and pools will be constructed to give the
restored streams a starting point that is heterogeneous and rich in habitat complexity. Riparian buffers
will be planted or supplemented along all the project reaches.
4.4 Physiochemical
No water quality sampling has been conducted on the Site. Stream erosion is a primary source of
sediment, nutrients and turbidity. Fecal coliform is another source of pollution within the watershed due
to livestock operations. Through significant reduction of these stressors through the reduction of
streambank erosion, implementation of proposed BMPs to treat runoff, stream buffer establishment
and protection, and related project activities, there is potential to improve the water quality and
physicochemical functioning of the project streams. In addition, water will flow over instream structures
that provide aeration, buffers will be improved in riparian zones to eventually shade and cool stream
flow and help filter runoff, and streams will be reconnected to floodplains to provide storage and
treatment of overbank flows. Improvements to physicochemical functioning will happen at various time
scale, and in some reaches are still subject to outside influence from beyond the project area. Due to the
lack of sufficient existing conditions data, physicochemical improvements will not be explicitly included
in the project success criteria for the seven-year monitoring period, although surrogate monitoring
criteria can demonstrate success, including visual observation and measurements which demonstrate
that the benefits described above are coming to fruition.
4.5 Biology
There are no available biological data for the site; however, the habitat conditions on the site are poor
as evidenced from visual assessments conducted at the site. While the riffle material is well-mixed small
gravel and the pools contain fine to coarse sand, the stream contains little woody debris or organic
material necessary to support diverse macroinvertebrate and fish communities. Stream reaches lack
deep pools and cattle access has destroyed much of the bed habitat on the site. In addition, habitat
connectivity is limited in portions of the project site by the presence of head-cuts, culverts and other
manipulation of stream channels.
There is opportunity to improve the instream and riparian habitat in addition to the physicochemical
function. Habitat will be improved by adding instream structures with a variety of rock and woody

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 14 December 12, 2018
materials, adding woody bank revetments, restoring or improving riparian buffers to shade the streams
and improve terrestrial habitat, creating pools of variable depths, reducing sources of fine sediments,
and excluding cattle from the project area. Habitat connectivity will be enhanced by removing headcuts
and creating more gradual channel transitions, as well as upgrading or replacing culverted crossings to
help with aquatic organism passage. Biological functions depend on many of the other stream functions
above, measurable improvements in biology may not occur until after the completion of the seven-year
monitoring period or until other larger scale watershed stressors are also addressed. There are
significant challenges in establishing valid pre- and post-project metrics which can be used to tie
biological success to the project when other factors are at play that include watershed-wide conditions,
climatic factors, etc. As such, biological improvements will not be included in the project success criteria
for the seven-year monitoring period.
5.0 Regulatory Considerations
Table 6 provides a summary of regulatory considerations for the site. These considerations are discussed
in this Section. All agency correspondence discussed below is included in Appendix 5.
Table 6: Regulatory Considerations
Parameters Applicable? Resolved? Supporting Docs?
Water of the United States - Section 404 Yes No1 Appendix 4
Water of the United States - Section 401 Yes No1 Appendix 4
Endangered Species Act Yes Yes Appendix 5
Historic Preservation Act Yes Yes Appendix 5
Coastal Zone Management Act No N/A N/A
Floodplain Compliance Yes No2 Appendix 5
Essential Fisheries Habitat No N/A N/A
1. PCN to be provided to IRT with Final Mitigation Plan.
2. A floodplain development permit application will be submitted to the local floodplain administrator.
5.1 Waters of the US (401/404)
The project proposes to impact approximately 0.74 acres of wetlands due to realignment of stream
channels, floodplain grading, and construction access. Most proposed wetland impacts, approximately
0.70 acres, are in areas currently impacted by cattle grazing. Impacts ultimately will benefit the site by
improving hydrology and vegetation upon completion of the project. By raising stream channels, the
project will likely result in a net gain of wetland acreage and uplift in wetland function. Several wetlands
(E, G, I – P) will also be improved by planting native vegetation and fencing out livestock. Project streams
and wetlands will be protected in perpetuity under the conservation easement placed on the property.
Table 7 estimates the anticipated impacts to wetland areas on this project. The Pre-Construction
Notification, including this data, will be submitted to the IRT with the Final Mitigation Plan.

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 15 December 12, 2018
Table 7: Estimated Impacts to Project Wetlands
Jurisdictional
Feature Classification Wetland Area
(acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T) Type of Activity Impact Area
(acres)
Wetland A
Riparian
Non-Riverine
0.01 P
Stream Re-Alignment
0.01
Wetland B <0.01 P <0.01
Wetland C 0.02 P 0.02
Wetland D 0.02 P Stream Re-Alignment 0.02
Wetland E 0.17 P 0.03
Wetland E 0.17 T
Floodplain Grading
0.14
Wetland F 0.13 P 0.13
Wetland G 0.13 P 0.01
Wetland H 0.05 P 0.05
Wetland K 0.07 T Construction Access 0.03
Wetland N 0.05 P Stream Re-alignment 0.02
Wetland N 0.05 T Floodplain Grading 0.03
Wetland O 0.15 P 0.15
Wetland P 0.21 T Construction Access 0.02
Wetland P 0.21 T Floodplain Grading 0.03
Wetland Q 0.04 T Construction Access 0.04
Wetland V 0.03 T Floodplain Grading 0.01

5.2 Threatened and Endangered Species
Wildlands utilized the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) database to search for federally listed
threatened and endangered plant and animal species in Wilkes County, NC. Two animal species
identified as threatened and one invertebrate endangered species are currently listed in Wilkes County
(Table 8). A pedestrian survey was conducted on May 3, 2018, indicated that the site could provide
potential for the northern long-eared bat and no suitable habitat was identified for the bog turtle or
rusty-patched bumble bee. No individual species were located during the time of the survey.
Table 8: Listed Threatened and Endangered Species in Wilkes County, NC
Species Federal Status Common Name Scientific Name
Northern Long-Eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis Threatened
Bog Turtle Glyptemys muhlenbergii Threatened (Similarity of Appearance)
Rusty-patched Bumble Bee Bombus affinis Endangered
Source: https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/wilkes.html
A letter was sent to the USFWS on February 8, 2018, requesting a review of the project and comment on
potential effects on endangered species or other resources. The USFWS (Service) responded on March
7, 2018 and stated for the federally threatened northern long-eared bat, the project “would occur at a
location where any incidental take that may result from associated activities is exempt under the 4(d)
rule.”
The USFWS has no known records for the federally threatened bog turtle or suitable habitat in the
immediate vicinity of the site, however occurrences for this species circle the site. The southern

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 16 December 12, 2018
population of this species is not subject to section 7 consultation however, the USFWS recommends that
a qualified biologist evaluate the site for suitable habitats. At the recommendation of USFWS, Wildlands
conducted a pedestrian biologist survey on May 3, 2018, and no suitable habitat was identified for bog
turtle. An ecological succession will automatically occur on the site post-restoration due to the cattle
exclusion. The developing riparian forest will shade existing wetlands; therefore, we do not anticipate
project wetlands being more conducive to the species in the future. The proposed design has been
developed to avoid impacts to existing floodplain wetlands where possible. While the protected stream
and riparian forest corridors may provide connectivity between habitats, this connectivity will be the
extent of project-mediated benefits regarding bog turtles. No monitoring is proposed for potential bog
turtle habitat.
The USFWS also had no records of any other federally protected species in the project vicinity. Based on
the pedestrian survey and correspondence with USFWS, Wildlands believes a “not likely to adversely
affect” determination is appropriate. All correspondence with USFWS is included in Appendix 5.
A letter requesting review and comment was also sent to the NC Wildlife Resources Commission
(NCWRC) on February 8, 2018. The NCWRC responded on March 14, 2018, indicating the project
including a woody buffer would benefit water quality and aquatic and terrestrial habitats and the
project should not impact wild trout resources.
5.3 FEMA Floodplain Compliance and Hydrologic Trespass
There is a FEMA regulated floodplain on SF Fishing Creek, Reach 11 (Figure 8). Wildlands has
corresponded with the floodplain administrator from Wilkes County and will complete the appropriate
floodplain development permit application prior to construction. The site will be designed so that
hydrologic trespass does not occur.
5.4 Cultural Resources / Conservation Lands / Natural Heritage Areas
We have corresponded with SHPO and received a letter reply on March 22, 2018. SHPO is “aware of no
historic resources which would be affected by the project… and have no comment on the project as
proposed.” There are no natural heritage areas listed in the immediate vicinity of the Site. Wilkes County
Open Space areas are located over a mile from the Site, and the Brushy Mountains/ Vannoy Ridge area
is approximately 6 miles south of the Site. See Figure 1 for locations of nearby NC Historic Preservation
Areas, Significant Natural Heritage Areas, and NC Natural Heritage Program Managed Areas.
6.0 Mitigation Site Goals and Objectives
The project will address the watershed stressors of fecal contamination, habitat degradation, and
agricultural and pasture watershed disturbances outlined in the RBRP, Water Quality Plan, and Wildlife
Action Plan (WAP). The project will improve stream functions as described in Section 4 through stream
restoration, stream enhancement, cattle exclusion, and riparian buffer re-vegetation. Project goals are
desired project outcomes and are verifiable through measurement and/or visual assessment. Objectives
are activities that will result in the accomplishment of goals. The project will be monitored after
construction to evaluate performance as described in Section 11 of this report. The project goals and
related objectives are described in Table 9.

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 17 December 12, 2018
Table 9: Mitigation Goals and Objectives
Goals Objectives Expected Outcomes Functions Improved
Reduce pollutant inputs
to streams including fecal
coliform, nitrogen, and
phosphorous.
Exclude cattle from streams and buffers by
installing fencing around conservation
easements adjacent to cattle pastures and
providing alternative water sources as
necessary, or by removing cattle from sites.
Remove riparian buffer areas within
conservation easement from agricultural
production.
Reduction in pollutant
loads to streams
caused by cattle access
and agricultural runoff.
Physicochemical
Reduce inputs of
sediment into streams
from eroding stream
banks.
Reconstruct stream channels with stable
dimensions. Add bank revetments and in-
stream structures to protect
restored/enhanced streams. Capture
agricultural erosion in BMP basins. Stabilize
eroding gully features.
Reduction in sediment
loadings to streams
from bank erosion.
Physicochemical
Return networks of
streams to a stable form
that is capable of
supporting hydrologic,
biologic, and water
quality functions.
Construct stream channels that will maintain
a stable pattern and profile considering the
hydrologic and sediment inputs to the
system, the landscape setting, and the
watershed conditions.
Reduce shear stress on
channel boundary.
Support all stream
functions above
hydrology.
Hydraulic,
Geomorphic,
Physicochemical,
Biology
Raise local groundwater
elevations and allow for
more frequent overbank
flows. Reduce shear
stress on channels during
larger flow events.
Reconstruct stream channels with
appropriate bankfull dimensions and depth
relative to the existing floodplain.
Raise water table and
hydrate riparian
wetlands. Allow flood
flows to disperse on
the floodplain. Support
Geomorphic and higher
level functions.
Hydraulic,
Geomorphic,
Physicochemical,
Biology
Improve aquatic habitat
in project streams.
Install habitat features such as constructed
riffles, cover logs, and brush toe into
restored/enhanced streams. Add woody
materials to channel beds. Construct pools
of varying depth.
Increase and diversify
available habitats for
macroinvertebrates,
fish, and amphibians
leading to colonization
and increase in
biodiversity over time.
Add complexity
including LWD to the
streams.
Biology
Create and improve
riparian habitats. Provide
a canopy to shade
streams and reduce
thermal loadings. Create
a source of woody inputs
for streams. Reduce flood
flow velocities on
floodplain and improve
long-term lateral stability
of streams.
Plant native tree and understory species in
riparian zone.
Reduce sediment
inputs from bank
erosion and runoff.
Increase nutrient
cycling and storage in
floodplain. Provide
riparian habitat. Add a
source of LWD and
organic material to
stream.
Geomorphic,
Physicochemical,
Biology

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 18 December 12, 2018
Goals Objectives Expected Outcomes Functions Improved
Ensure that development
and agricultural uses that
would damage the site or
reduce the benefits of
project are prevented.
Establish conservation easements on the
site.
Protection of the site
from harmful uses in
perpetuity.
Hydraulic,
Geomorphic,
Physicochemical,
Biology
7.0 Design Approach and Mitigation Work Plan
7.1 Design Approach Overview
The design approach for this Site was developed to support the goals and objectives described in Section
6 which were formulated based on the potential for uplift described in Section 4. The design is intended
to provide the expected outcomes in Table 9, though performance criteria are specified elsewhere. The
project streams will be reconnected with an active flood bench or floodplain at the bankfull stage, and
the bankfull channels will be reconstructed with stable dimension, pattern, and profile that will
transport the water and sediment delivered to the system. The adjacent floodplains will be planted with
native tree species. Instream structures will be constructed in the channels to help maintain stable
channel morphology and improve aquatic habitat. The entire project area will be protected in perpetuity
by a conservation easement.
The design approach for this site utilized a combination of reference reach (analogous) and analytical
channel design approaches to guide stream restoration channel sizing and design ratios. The sections
that follow discuss reference reaches which were identified to serve as the basis for design parameters,
and the sizing of channels based on design discharge hydrologic and sediment transport analyses.
7.2 Reference Streams
Reference streams provide geomorphic parameters of a stable system, which can be used to inform
design of stable channels of similar stream types in similar landscapes and watersheds. Eleven reference
reaches were identified for this Site and used to support the design of the Site’s streams. These
reference reaches were chosen because of their similarities to the Site streams including drainage area,
valley slope, channel slope, and bed material. A description of each reference reach is included below.
Geomorphic parameter tables for these reference reaches and a reference reach vicinity map are
included in Appendix 6.
Ironwood Tributary Reference Reach
Ironwood Tributary reference reach is located at the downstream end of Ironwood Tributary, ending
approximately 60 feet before the confluence with WF Fishing Creek. The reach is geomorphically
described as a steep (11.4%) step-like system and classifies as an A5a+ channel. It has a drainage area of
0.03 square miles and is surrounded by heavy canopy coverage. It has a channel sinuosity of 1.19 which
is considerably high when thinking of high gradient systems. Several long gravel/cobble riffles were
observed that cascaded into pools over root mass, woody debris or a boulder step at the tail of riffle.
Magnolia Tributary Reference Reach
Magnolia Tributary reference reach is a 555 ft B4c stream located at the western-most end of the
project site and has a drainage area of approximately 0.31 square miles. The reach is surrounded by
heavy canopy coverage and has high bedform diversity with riffles and meander pools. Magnolia
Tributary has a slope of 2% and a sinuosity of 1.26. The banks of Magnolia Tributary have good
vegetation ranging from grasses to mature trees.

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 19 December 12, 2018
Shew Ridge Tributary A Reference Reach
Shew Ridge Tributary A reference reach is a small and steep headwater channel with a drainage area of
0.02 square miles. Shew Ridge Tributary A is located at the far north-western end of the project site and
is surrounded by a forested land cover. The reach has a slope of approximately 6.5% and a sinuosity of
1.1, which classifies this reach as an B5a channel. Several riffles were observed that cascaded into pools
over root mass or woody debris.
Timber Tributary (Mid-reach) Reference Reach
Timber Tributary Reference Reach is a 200 ft B4 classified channel and is located on-site. It has a
drainage area of approximately 0.04 square miles. The stream meanders through confined valley
surrounded by mature trees. The channel has a moderate slope of 3.2%, and a channel sinuosity of 1.12.
This system supports varied habitats including woody debris, rock riffles and meander pools.
UT to SF Fishing Creek Reference Reach
UT to SF Fishing Creek reference reach is a small, locally steep (8.2%) B5a channel. It has a drainage area
of approximately 0.02 square miles. UT to SF Fishing Creek is surrounded by a forested land cover and is
located at the downstream-most end of the project site. The bedform consists of bedrock slides and
boulder step-pool cascades located at the tail of riffle features. The channel is confined so the banks are
relatively high but host a variety of mature vegetation.
UT to Gap Branch
UT to Gap Branch is located in the Box Creek Wilderness in Union Mills, NC. This stream flows through a
confined valley with an alluvial bottom. The overall stream slope is 6.8% and the width to depth ratio is
10.1. The entrenchment ratio is 3.4, and Rosgen classification for this reach unclear: this reach could be
classified either as a slightly entrenched B4a or a slightly entrenched A4.
UT to Kelly Branch
The UT to Kelly Branch reference reach is a small, steep, headwater channel located in McDowell
County. It has a drainage area of 0.08 square miles and is classified as an A4 step-pool channel. The
valley slope is 4.9% and the channel slope is 4.75%. The channel has a sinuosity of 1.0 with several long
gravel/cobble riffles and cascade pools.
Box Creek
The Box Creek reference reach site is part of the Broad River Basin located in Rutherford County and has
a drainage area of 2.13 square miles. The entire watershed is forested and the reference reach site is
located approximately a quarter mile upstream from a large pond. The reach is characterized by short
riffles, deep pools, and long shallow runs. This moderately sinuous reach (1.3) classifies as a C4 channel
and has a high width/depth ratio of 19.1. This reach reported a bank height ratio of 1.5 but banks were
typically stable due to a large extent of woody vegetation lining each bank, especially along the outer
bends of a few tight meanders. In-stream habitat structures included undercut banks, woody debris, and
coarse substrate from which fish have built several gravel piles for nesting.
UT to Austin Branch DS
This reference reach is located in northern Buncombe County, NC. The reach is can be classified as a A4
channel or a slightly entrenched B4a channel. The drainage area for the reach is 0.12 square miles. The
valley slope is 4.8% and the channel slope is 4.0%.
Meadow Fork
The Meadow Fork reference site is located within a maintained agriculture field. The stream banks are
densely vegetated with tag alder (Alnus serrulata). Beyond the dense alder thickets the floodplain
vegetation is comprised of pasture grasses such as fescue. The heavily wooded stream banks contribute

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 20 December 12, 2018
to the stream’s stability. Meadow Fork has a drainage area of 4.4 square miles and is classified as an E4
channel.
UT to South Crowders
UT to South Crowders is a perennial stream located in Crowder Mountain State Park and receives
drainage from the forested mountain side. The stream is quite sinuous with a sinuosity of 2.2. The width
to depth ratio ranges from 5.8 to 8.0 and it has a high entrenchment ratio ranging from 3.7 to 4.3.
Habitat features include root mats, deep meander pools, rock riffles, and woody debris in the channel.
This stream classifies as a Rosgen E4 stream type.
7.3 Design Channel Morphological Parameters
Reference reaches were an important source of information to develop the cross section, pattern, and
profile design parameters for the restoration and enhancement I reaches. Ranges of pattern parameters
were developed within the reference reach parameter ranges with some exceptions based on best
professional judgement and experience from previous projects. For example, on meandering stream
reaches, radius of curvature ratio has been kept above 1.8. Wildlands has found this minimum ratio to
support stable geometry. Pool depths were designed to be a minimum of 1.2 times deeper than riffle
maximum depth to provide habitat variation. Cross-section parameters such as area, depth, and width
were designed based on the design discharge, stable bank slopes, and width to depth ratios similar to
reference conditions. Morphological tables for existing, reference, and proposed conditions are located
in Appendix 6.
7.4 Design Discharge Analysis
Multiple methods were used to develop design bankfull discharge estimates for each of the project
restoration reaches. The resulting values were compared and concurrence between the estimates and
best professional judgment was used to determine the specific design discharge for each restoration
reach. Each of the methods is described below.
7.4.1 Published Regional Curve Data
Bankfull discharge was estimated using the published NC Rural Piedmont Curve (Harman et al., 1999) as
well as the updated NRCS curve for rural Piedmont and Mountain streams (Walker, unpublished).
7.4.2 Regional Flood Frequency Analysis
A regional flood frequency analysis was performed by using 26 USGS gages in the North Carolina
Piedmont including five gages with drainage areas smaller than 1 square mile. The Hosking and Walls
(1995) homogeneity test was performed using statistical software R© to identify the most appropriate
gages for use in the analysis. Flood frequency regression curves were developed to calculate discharges
for ungaged streams in the North Carolina Piedmont for the 1.2-year and 1.5-year recurrence intervals.
7.4.3 Reference Reach Regional Curve
Eleven reference reaches were identified for this project. Survey data from each reference reach was
used to analyze drainage area-discharge relationships as well as for the development of dimensionless
design parameters. Stable cross-sectional dimensions and channel slopes were used to compute a
bankfull discharge with Manning’s equation for each reference reach. The resulting discharge values
were plotted with drainage area and compared to the other discharge estimation methods.
7.4.4 Manning’s Equation
Manning’s Equation was used to estimate bankfull discharge for the project reaches by surveying
existing conditions cross-sections where observable bankfull features were present.

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 21 December 12, 2018
7.4.5 Design Discharge Analysis Summary
The design discharges for each restoration and enhancement I project reach were selected so that the
reconstructed channels will access their floodplain benches or floodplains at the bankfull stage, which
will result in flood relief and floodplain activation at the desired frequency. As part of design discharge
selection, results from each of the methods described above were evaluated and compared to the other
methods. For the broad range of drainage areas present on this Site, it was determined that the
magnitude of the drainage area should guide the methods to use in the selection of design discharge.
For reaches with relatively larger drainage areas, most of the emphasis was placed on the results from
the regional flood frequency (1.2-year event), Manning’s Equation from surveyed cross-sections,
reference reach curve, and the Walker regional curve. For reaches with relatively smaller drainage areas,
most of the emphasis was placed on the results from the regional flood frequency (1.5-year event),
Manning’s Equation from surveyed cross-sections, and the reference reach curve. Table 10 provides a
summary of the selected design discharge for each project reach. Appendix 6 provides a summary of the
discharge analyses and a graph of the project discharge data overlain with the NC regional curves.
Table 10: Summary of Design Bankfull Discharge by Reach
Stream Reach Drainage Area (sq. mi.) Design Discharge (cfs)
SF Fishing Creek Reach 2 1.48 105
SF Fishing Creek Reach 3 1.69 116
SF Fishing Creek Reach 5 1.84 123
SF Fishing Creek Reach 6 2.55 158
SF Fishing Creek Reach 7 2.58 158
SF Fishing Creek Reach 8 2.64 158
SF Fishing Creek Reach 10 2.71 160
SF Fishing Creek Reach 11 6.17 300
WF Fishing Creek Reach 1 3.12 177
WF Fishing Creek Reach 2 3.24 182
WF Fishing Creek Reach 3 3.25 182
WF Fishing Creek Reach 4 3.29 184
WF Fishing Creek Reach 5 3.39 190
Chicken Tributary 1 Reach 2 0.70 68
Magnolia Tributary Reach 2 0.33 39
Critcher Tributary Reach 1 0.02 6
Critcher Tributary Reach 2 0.03 10
Critcher Tributary Reach 3 0.07 16
Critcher Tributary Reach 4 0.17 27
Critcher Tributary A 0.09 20
Critcher Tributary C 0.00 2
Critcher Tributary D 0.01 4
Antioch Tributary Reach 2 0.02 6
Antioch Tributary Reach 3 0.07 16
Antioch Tributary Reach 4 0.11 22

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 22 December 12, 2018
Stream Reach Drainage Area (sq. mi.) Design Discharge (cfs)
Antioch Tributary A Reach 2 0.03 10
Antioch Tributary B Reach 2 0.04 11
Robin Hill Tributary Reach 1 0.03 9
Robin Hill Tributary Reach 2 0.04 11
Robin Hill Tributary A 0.01 3
Robin Hill Tributary B 0.01 3
Ironwood Tributary Reach 1 0.03 9
Oak Tributary 0.04 11
Timber Tributary Reach 2 0.08 17
Shew Ridge Tributary Reach 2 0.11 21

7.5 Sediment Transport Analysis
To assess the magnitude of the bed load supply on the project streams, Wildlands performed a
qualitative assessment of the sediment volume and sources in the project watershed. The watershed
was assessed through aerial photography and field reconnaissance to characterize past and current land
cover and potential sediment sources. The potential sediment sources within the watershed are
overland runoff, streambank erosion and trampling, and gully scour from concentrated flow locations
and lateral gullies throughout the stream networks. The land cover in the watershed is agricultural row
crops, pasture, and forest. Overland runoff is periodically a significant source of sediment for project
reaches adjacent to row crop production when these field are tilled between harvesting. On-site
streams were visually inspected to qualitatively assess aggradation and degradation within the channels.
There was limited evidence of sediment accumulation throughout the project streams, indicating that
aggradation within the reaches is not an issue. Once the project is constructed, on-site sediment sources
will be addressed by protecting streambanks, stabilizing lateral gullies, eliminating cattle trampling, and
stabilizing the riparian corridor with vegetation.
The watershed assessment indicates that the bedload supply is relatively low and that the project
streams are not capacity limited. The focus of sediment transport analysis for this design was to verify
that the designed channels will be stable over time and can pass sediment from the watersheds. Both
competence and capacity analyses were performed on the streams to aid in the development of the
channel designs.
7.5.1 Competence Analysis
Competence analyses were performed by comparing shear stress associated with the design bankfull
discharge, channel dimensions, and channel slope with the size distribution of the bed load. The analysis
utilized standard equations based on a methodology using the Shields (1936) curve and Andrews (1984)
equation described by Rosgen (2001). This analysis is used to verify that the design will move the bed
load material supplied to the stream. The results of the analysis are shown in Appendix 6.
The competence analysis indicates that each design reach will have enough boundary shear stress to
move the largest particle in the subpavement (which is theoretically representative of the bedload). It
should be noted that the competence analysis is based on the size material naturally found in the
stream. Riffles with larger material such as chunky riffles will be used in the design as grade control. The
reconstructed channels will not produce enough shear stress to entrain the large particles in these

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 23 December 12, 2018
structures. Therefore, excess shear stress is not expected to present a stability problem for the restored
channels.
7.5.2 Capacity Analysis
Sediment capacity can be considered in terms of unit stream power which expresses the rate that energy
of flowing water is expended on the bed and banks of the stream and, therefore, the stream’s ability to
transport sediment (NRCS, 2007). To evaluate the sediment transport capacity of the project streams,
stream power was compared between pre-project and post-project design conditions. Unit stream power
(ω) is equal to shear stress (τ) times mean velocity (vbkf):
ω = τ*vbkf
Stream capacity is not anticipated to be a relevant consideration in headwater tributaries which will
have stable vertical profiles with minimum mobility, and low sediment supply from their subwatersheds.
In these settings, capacity will exceed supply.
For the larger, flatter floodplain reaches, the watersheds are generally no longer controlled fully within
the project area. The sediment supply is unknown, but a large percentage of the sediment supplied to
the project, based on source analysis, will be wash load (fines) which will be handled by the system
and/or deposited on gentle bank slopes or reconnected floodplains which have significant ability to
store sediment. In stream segments which have undergone a full cycle of channel evolution, and
therefore exhibit less capacity due to their reduced shear and velocity, no depositional issues within the
channel were observed. The stream power for proposed channels has been calculated and compared to
the existing stream power for the bankfull flow.
7.6 Project Implementation
The mitigation approaches proposed for the streams on the site have been developed to address
functional impairments observed on the site. The site plan includes elements of stream restoration,
enhancement I, enhancement II, and preservation as described below. Figures 9A and 9B show the
approaches proposed for each of the project reaches.
Restoration reaches will be constructed with a Priority 1 approach to the extent possible. Priority 2 will
be used on transition zones to tie into off-site conditions or in narrow, confined valleys where the
channel cannot be raised as high as the historic floodplain and water table elevation. These restoration
reaches have been designed to create stable, functional stream channels based on reference reach
parameters, design discharge analysis, and sediment transport analysis. Dimension, pattern, and profile
have been designed for all restoration reaches to provide a cross-sectional area sized for frequent
overbank flows onto a well-connected floodplain, a stable bed with variable bed forms, well-vegetated
bank slopes, and improvements to aquatic habitat and water quality, enabling biological lift. Improved
vertical and lateral stability will reduce stream channel erosion. Diverse bedforms will be established
using in-stream structures appropriate for the geomorphic settings, as well as using a range of planform
and profile design ratios which support habitat complexity. Structures will also be used to provide grade
control to prevent incision, and to serve as or enhance habitat. Pools will have varied depths to mimic
natural streams and will include various types of cover.
For the enhancement level I reaches, mitigation activities will include a combination of localized channel
reconstruction (similar to restoration described above) and sections of enhancement II-type treatments
consisting of leaving the existing channel in place and performing localized bank repairs.
Enhancement II reaches are characterized by channels that have incised in the past but are now stable.
Most of these channels are at least partially located in areas with a wooded buffer that are currently
accessible by livestock, but where impacts from livestock are less widespread. These channels will be left

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 24 December 12, 2018
in place. Localized bank stabilization and addition of in-stream log and rock structures may be located in
Enhancement II reaches to enhance stability or habitat. These activities, along with livestock exclusion
and/or the removal of agricultural activities from the buffer, are targeted to return the streams to a
functional state with enhanced water quality and improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat. Invasive
vegetation within the riparian buffer will be treated, and supplemental planting will improve the health
and density of the buffer condition and function.
Reaches that are stable and functioning will be preserved to protect them from future impacts from
cattle, agricultural production, timbering or site development. Recent timbering has been observed in
the headwaters of several streams near the Site and the larger watershed; preservation will protect
against impacts to headwater streams and the conversion of headwater buffers into agricultural usage.
Preservation protection will protect against habitat degradation from land-disturbing activities, one of
the primary stressors listed in the RBRP.
Each of the project reaches will be placed in a conservation easement to protect the project in
perpetuity. The entire easement will be fenced to keep livestock out of the project area. If livestock are
removed from the site in the future, fencing will not be necessary. The streambanks and floodplains will
be planted with native tree and shrub species to re-establish a wooded riparian buffer in areas that are
currently lacking a buffer.
SF Fishing Creek
Cattle currently have access to Reaches 1-8 of SF Fishing Creek. SF Fishing Creek Reaches 1, 4, and 9 are
mostly stable. Reach 1 has a very narrow buffer and substantial buffer planting is proposed in addition
to livestock exclusion and invasive vegetation treatment. Reach 4 has a wider buffer but has
supplemental planting, livestock exclusion and invasive vegetation treatment proposed. Reach 9
consists of stable stream banks with a narrow, mature wooded buffer along both banks. In Reach 9, in-
stream structures will be added at discrete locations as shown on the plans to enhance habitat and
stability, and the existing farm road along the right bank will be decommissioned and the road bed will
be lowered by approximately 1.5 feet to provide a floodplain bench adjacent to this reach. Reaches 1
and 9 are proposed for Enhancement Level II credit at 2.5:1 ratio, and SF Fishing Reach 4 is proposed for
Enhancement II credit at a 4:1 ratio owing to the current relatively stable condition and the lesser
degree of work proposed.
South Fork Fishing Creek Reaches 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, and 11 require restoration of dimension, pattern,
and profile to address vertical incision and lateral instability. A meandering C stream type has been
designed, shifting the floodplain to provide a stable belt width to be centered on the lowest part of the
valley. Priority 1 restoration will raise the channel cross-section to tie into the existing floodplain grade
at the bankfull stage. Cattle that currently access Reaches 1-8 will be excluded and a riparian buffer will
be re-established throughout the project limits. Concentrated flow drainage patterns will be addressed
at their entry point to the floodplain to improve floodplain and bank stability throughout the reaches.

Critcher Tributary Watershed: Critcher Tributary, Critcher Tributary A, C, and D
The Critcher Tributaries require restoration to address incision, lack of bedform diversity, ongoing cattle
trampling impacts, and agricultural grazing impacts in the riparian buffer. Sediment trap BMPs are
proposed at the upstream ends of Critcher Tributary Reach 1 and Critcher Tributary D. These BMPs have
been sited upstream of the jurisdictional intermittent stream calls. The intent is to catch sediment
eroding from the adjacent pastures to reduce sediment impacts to the restored channels. The
restoration designs call for reduced slope on these incised and eroding channels and with reduced slope
the shear stress during high flows will also be reduced. Over time, reestablished riparian buffers will
help reduce impacts from upgradient pastures, and restored channels are expected to contribute much

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 25 December 12, 2018
less bank erosion sediment to the system. Initially, the BMPs are expected to intercept eroded sediment
and provide sediment storage. Over time, the BMPs are expected to function more as vegetated filter
strips and are not expected to maintain sediment storage capacity in perpetuity.
A step pool (B-type) or cascade pool (A-type) channel system has been designed for each of the Critcher
Tributaries, and the channel bed will be raised to address system-wide incision. Raised channels will
incorporate a narrow, bowl-shaped bankfull bench feature to reduce shear stress and recreate the
natural entrenchment ratio typical of these steeper slope channel types. The breached dam on Critcher
Tributary Reach 2 will be removed to establish an entrenchment ratio closer to 1.4 and to generate
usable fill dirt. As the downstream mainstem Critcher Reach 4 enters the wider and flatter floodplain of
SF Fishing Creek, the channel design transitions to a meandering stream morphology. Finally, a sediment
trap BMP has been designed in the right floodplain of Reach 4 to capture and filter agricultural runoff
from an upvalley gully.

Antioch Tributary Watershed: Antioch Tributary, Antioch Tributary A, A1, B, B1, and C
Antioch Tributary Reach 1, Antioch Tributary A Reach 1, Tributary A1, Antioch Tributary C, Antioch
Tributary B Reach 1, and Antioch Tributary B1 are each stable and suffer primarily from cattle trampling.
These reaches are slated for Enhancement II treatments including cattle exclusion, invasive vegetation
treatment, and supplemental buffer planting. Antioch Tributary C and Tributary B1 have wooded
wetlands in the headwaters where log sills will be installed to protect wetland grades and hydrology.
The remainder of the Antioch Tributary system suffers from cattle trampling, incision, and overwidening.
The upper reaches of the system (Antioch Reach 2 and 3; Antioch Tributary A Reach 2, and Antioch
Tributary B Reach 2 will be restored with an A cascade-pool or B-step pool system within their narrow
valleys. Existing bedrock knickpoints will be leveraged to raise the channel bed and overall profile along
these reaches. Antioch Tributary Reach 4 is located within a wider valley and will be relocated away
from the hillside toe and into the lowest part of the valley using a Priority 1 restoration to establish a C-
type meandering channel system.

Chicken Tributary Watershed: Chicken Tributary 1, 1A, and 2
Chicken Tributary 1 Reach 1, and Chicken Tributary 1A are located in steep, narrow valleys. They are
generally in stable condition and bedrock outcroppings have prevented incision. However, the riparian
buffer has been impacted by cattle access and invasive vegetation. Particularly on Chicken Tributary 1A,
a robust buffer will be an important line of treatment for concentrated agricultural runoff received from
both sides of the valley. Enhancement II treatments are proposed for these reaches including cattle
exclusion, invasive vegetation treatment, and supplemental planting. In addition, an existing culvert
crossing that has blown out will be addressed through re-alignment of the stream and reestablishment
of a stable stream profile coupled with the replacement of this crossing at the upstream end of Chicken
Tributary 1 Reach 1.

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 26 December 12, 2018
Chicken Tributary 1 Reach 2 suffers from widespread erosion and incision. This reach will be restored
using a Priority 1 offline meandering C-type channel as the narrow valley of Reach 1 transitions through
Reach 2 to the wider floodplain of SF Fishing Creek.

During the initial IRT site walk, it was agreed that Chicken Tributary 2’s hydrology is driven by headcut
incision and this is not a naturally-formed stream feature. This drainage will be stabilized as a vernal
pool and will not be considered for stream mitigation credits.

Robin Hill Tributary Watershed: Robin Hill Tributary, Robin Hill Tributary A, Robin Hill Tributary B
The Robin Hill system is located in a narrow, steep valley network. The primary stressor is incision and
erosion from headcuts working upstream through the steep gradient beds. A boulder cascade step pool
system is proposed to step flow down from the headwater seeps at the upstream end of Robin Hill
Tributary B and Robin Hill Tributary Reach 1. A storm water BMP is proposed upstream of the
jurisdictional extent of Robin Hill Tributary A to treat agricultural runoff before it enters the stream
channel, and to reduce sediment contributions from a vertical headcut gully. Each of these reaches will
be restored to a cascade-pool A channel or step pool B channel system, raising the bed profile to
address vertical incision and bank erosion. Robin Hill Tributary 2 will transition from an A cascade-pool
system to a meandering C channel with floodplain access and a higher entrenchment ratio as it enters
into the wider and flatter SF Fishing Creek floodplain.
WF Fishing Creek
WF Fishing Creek displays moderate incision and lateral bank erosion, with a mature wooded buffer on
the right bank and a narrow buffer adjacent to agricultural row crop production on the left bank.
Reaches 1 and 2 will be restored to correct meandering geometry along unstable and eroding outside
meander bends. Reaches 3, 4, and 5 are proposed for Enhancement I credit, using alternating
combinations of Enhancement II and Restoration treatments. This approach and crediting was discussed
during the initial IRT site walk.

Magnolia Tributary
Reach 1 of Magnolia Tributary is stable with good aquatic habitat and a native forested buffer. Reach 1
is proposed for Preservation. Reach 2 of Magnolia Tributary displays eroding banks and is proposed to
be restored for Enhancement I level credit to restore a meandering C channel dimension, pattern, and
profile as the channel enters the wider and flatter WF Fishing Creek floodplain.
Shew Ridge Tributary and Shew Ridge Tributary A
Shew Ridge Tributary Reach 1 and Shew Ridge Tributary A are stable channels with step pool bedform
diversity and a mature forested floodplain in narrow valleys. These reaches are proposed for
preservation. Shew Ridge Tributary Reach 2 is somewhat unstable with localized bank erosion. Because
of the valley transition from narrow and steep headwater valley to the flatter and unconfined floodplain
of WF Fishing Creek, this reach is proposed for restoration of a valley-appropriate meandering C channel
to restore dimension, pattern, and profile.
Ironwood Tributary
A sediment trap BMP is proposed upstream of the jurisdictional intermittent stream call on Ironwood
Tributary to capture sediment eroding from the surrounding agricultural production field. Reach 1 of
Ironwood Tributary is vertically incised with steep, eroding banks. This reach will be restored with stable
dimension, pattern, and profile appropriate for a B step pool channel. Existing headcuts will be
leveraged to raise the channel profile. Reach 2 of Ironwood Tributary steps over bedrock cascades and is
planned for Preservation credit.

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 27 December 12, 2018
Oak Tributary
Oak Tributary will be restored beginning at the headcut at the utility easement, allowing for Priority 1
restoration of dimension, pattern, and profile. Oak Tributary will be restored as a cascade-pool A
channel stepping down through its steep, narrow valley and transitioning to a short C channel section
when it reaches the unconfined floodplain of SF Fishing Creek. Oak Tributary’s current incision will be
repaired by tying Priority 1 restoration into the upstream headcut and raising the downstream end of
the channel to tie into the newly restored SF Fishing Creek elevation.
Timber Tributary and Timber Tributary A
Reach 1 of Timber Tributary and Timber Tributary A are slated for Preservation. These are steep step
pool channels in narrow valleys with a mature forest. Reach 2 of Timber Tributary exhibits bank erosion
and incision as it enters the WF Fishing Creek floodplain. Reach 2 of Timber Tributary is planned for
Restoration to establish a stable dimension, pattern, and profile to address erosion and incision as the
step pool channel transitions into the wider receiving stream’s floodplain.
7.7 Vegetation and Planting Plan
The objective of the planting plan is to establish, over time, a riparian buffer composed of native tree
and shrub species. This restored buffer will improve riparian and wetland habitat, help the restored
streams remain stable, shade the streams, and provide a source for LWD and organic material to the
streams.
Non-forested areas within the conservation easement will be planted with bare root tree species and
permanent riparian seed mix. In shaded areas, existing canopy will be supplemented with additional
bare root planting (trees and shrubs) to increase the density of woody species and seeded with riparian
seed mix in disturbed areas. Proposed buffer plantings are generally early successional native vegetation
which have been chosen to develop species diversity and are listed on Sheet 4.0 of the preliminary
design plans located in Appendix 9. The specific species composition to be planted was selected based
on the community type, observation of occurrence of species in riparian buffers adjacent to the Site, and
best professional judgement on species establishment and anticipated Site conditions in the early years
following project implementation.
Invasive species within the riparian buffers will be treated at the time of construction. The extent of
invasive species coverage will be monitored, mapped, and controlled as necessary throughout the
required monitoring period as described in the following section.
7.8 Invasive Vegetation Species Control Plan
Annual monitoring and semi-annual site visits will be conducted to assess the condition of the project.
These site inspections may identify the presence of invasive vegetation. If, during the monitoring period,
invasive species threaten the survivability of planted woody vegetation in an area that exceeds 1% of
the planted easement acreage, the invasive species shall be treated. Smaller areas may be treated at the
discretion of the project engineer and biologist, if deemed in the best interest of the Site. Generally, the
treatment plan shall follow the below guidelines in Table 11 for common invasive species found in
riparian areas; however, the treatment may be changed based on the professional judgement of the
project engineer and biologist. For invasive species not listed in the below table that threaten the
survivability of the planted woody vegetation, Wildlands shall notify IRT of the invasive species observed
and the plan for treatment prior to treating the species. All invasive species treatment will be reported
in the following year’s monitoring plan.

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 28 December 12, 2018
Table 11: Invasive Vegetation Treatment
Invasive
Vegetation
Species
Recommended Removal Technique
Honeysuckle
(Lonicera
japonica)
Small infestations of L. japonica can be pulled by hand. Monitor to remove any re-sprouts.
Care should be taken to bag and remove the plants, including mature fruits to prevent re-
establishment. Large infestations of L. japonica will usually require a combination of cut stump
and foliar herbicide treatments. Where vines have grown into the tree canopy, cut each stem
as close to the ground as possible. Treat the freshly cut surface of the rooted stem with a 25
percent solution of glyphosate or triclopyr. Remove the twining vines to prevent them from
girdling and killing desirable vegetation. Groundcovers of L. japonica can be treated with a
foliar solution of 2 percent glyphosate or triclopyr plus a 0.5 percent non-ionic surfactant to
thoroughly wet all the leaves.
Chinese Privet
(Ligustrum
sinense)
Thoroughly wet all leaves with one of the following herbicides in water with a surfactant: a
glyphosate herbicide as a 3-percent solution (12 ounces per 3-gallon mix) in the late fall or
early winter when safety to surrounding vegetation is desired, or elsewhere, Arsenal AC* as a
1-percent solution (4 ounces per 3-gallon mix). Backpack mist blowers can broadcast
glyphosate as a 3-percent solution (12 ounces per 3-gallon mix) or Escort XP* at 1 ounce per
acre (0.2 dry ounces per 3-gallon mix and 10 gallons per acre) during winter for safety to
dormant hardwoods. Summer applications of glyphosate may not be as effective as other
times and require a higher percent solution. The best time for Arsenal AC* and Escort XP* is
summer to fall. For stems too tall for foliar sprays and when safety to surrounding vegetation
is desired, apply a basal spray of Garlon 4 as a 20-percent solution (5 pints per 3-gallon mix) in
a labeled basal oil product, vegetable oil or mineral oil with a penetrant, or fuel oil or diesel
fuel (where permitted); or undiluted Pathfinder II. Elsewhere, apply Stalker* as a 6- to 9-
percent solution (1.5 to 2 pints per 3-gallon mix) in a labeled basal oil product, vegetable oil or
mineral oil with a penetrant, or fuel oil or diesel fuel (where permitted) to young bark as a
basal spray making certain to treat all stems in a clump; or cut and immediately treat the
stump tops with Arsenal AC* as a 5-percent solution (20 ounces per 3-gallon mix) or Velpar L*
as a 10-percent solution in water (1 quart per 3-gallon mix) with a surfactant. When safety to
surrounding vegetation is desired, immediately treat stump tops and sides with Garlon 3A or
with a glyphosate herbicide as a 20-percent solution (5 pints per 3-gallon mix) in water with a
surfactant. ORTHO Brush-B-Gon and Enforcer Brush Killer are effective undiluted for treating
cut-stumps and available in retail garden stores (safe to surrounding plants). For large stems,
make stem injections using Arsenal AC* or when safety to surrounding vegetation is desired,
Garlon 3A or a glyphosate herbicide using dilutions and cut-spacings specified on the herbicide
label (anytime except March and April). An EZ-Ject tree injector can help to reach the lower
part of the main stem; otherwise, every branching trunk must be hack-and-squirt injected.
Kudzu
(Pueraria
montana)
Small patches of P. montana that are not well-established can usually be eliminated by
persistent weeding, mowing, or grazing during the growing season. The spread of a well-
established infestation of P. montana can be controlled the same way, but cutting will typically
not kill the roots of larger plants. For vines in tree canopies, cut the vines near the ground and
apply a 50 percent solution of triclopyr to the stumps. This procedure remains effective at
lower temperatures as long as the ground is not frozen. Large infestations can be effectively
controlled with a foliar solution of 2 to 3 percent glyphosate or triclopyr plus a 0.5 percent
non-ionic surfactant to thoroughly wet all leaves. The ambient air temperature should be
above 65 degrees Fahrenheit. After the above ground vegetation is controlled and it is
possible to dig and cut into the central root crown, apply a 50 percent solution of glyphosate
or triclopyr to the wound. The most successful chemical control of P. montana can be
achieved with a foliar solution of 0.75 percent clopyralid plus a 0.5 percent non-ionic
surfactant. Monitor all treatments in subsequent years for re-sprouting.

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 29 December 12, 2018
Invasive
Vegetation
Species
Recommended Removal Technique
Porcelain berry
(Ampelopsis
glandulosa var.
brevipedunculata)
The most effective chemical control of A. brevipedunculata has been achieved using triclopyr
formulations toward the end of the growing season when plants are transporting nutrients to
their roots. Apply a 2 percent solution of triclopyr plus a 0.5 percent non-ionic surfactant to
the foliage. Or cut the plants first, allow time for re-growth, and then apply the herbicide
mixture. A. brevipedunculata can also be killed with a mixture of 25 percent triclopyr and 75
percent mineral oil applied to the basal parts of the stem to a height of 2 to 3 feet from the
ground. This method should be used judiciously since it takes a lot of chemical and can result
in overspray. It has been used successfully in situations where no other technique is feasible,
such as cliff faces or other exposed sites.
Japanese Hops
(Humulus
japonicus)
Pre-emergent herbicide containing sulfometuron methyl (Oust XP) applied in early spring
causes minimal damage to established perennial vegetation. Mechanical control by cutting or
mowing as close to the ground as possible beginning in late spring and recurring frequently
until fall dieback is recommended. Post emergent herbicide treatment two times a year (mid
and late summer) to prevent the fall seed set is recommended. Glyphosate provides good
post-emergent chemical control. Hop seeds in the soil last up to three years. Repeat
treatments for two to three years should be expected, or longer in areas subject to flooding
that may receive influx of seeds from upstream infestations. Cultural control methods which
favor fast-growing tall tree species to create dense shade in spring and summer and canopy
closure will discourage infestations, as Japanese hop prefers direct sunlight and does not
tolerate heavy shade. Establishing an early thick groundcover of hairy vetch, wheat, barley or
rye can reduce hop germination and seedling survival. (National Park Service, Plant
Conservation Alliance, Alien Plants Working Group, 2009)
Johnson Grass
(Sorghum
halepense)
Recommended control procedures:
Thoroughly wet all leaves with one of the following herbicides in water with a surfactant (June
to October with multiple applications applied to regrowth).
• Recommendation for mature grass control: apply Outrider* as a broadcast spray at 0.75 to 2
ounces per acre (0.2 to 0.6 dry ounce per 3-gallon mix) plus a nonionic surfactant to actively
growing Johnsongrass. For handheld and high-volume sprayers, apply 1 ounce of Outrider per
100 gallons of water plus a nonionic surfactant at 0.25 percent. Outrider is a selective
herbicide that can be applied over the top of certain other grasses to kill Johnsongrass, or
apply Plateau as a 0.25-percent solution (1 ounce per 3-gallon mix) when plants are 18 to 24
inches (45 to 60 cm) tall or larger.
• Recommendation for seedling control: apply Journey as a 0.3-percent solution (1.2 ounces
per 3-gallon mix) before Johnsongrass sprouts and when desirable species are dormant or
apply a glyphosate herbicide as a 2-percent solution (8 ounces per 3-gallon mix) directed at
the infestation.
Mimosa
(Albizia julibrissin)
Trees: Make stem injections using Arsenal AC* or when safety to surrounding vegetation is
desired, Garlon 3A or Milestone in dilutions as specified on the herbicide label (anytime except
March and April). For felled trees, apply the herbicides to stump tops immediately after
cutting. ORTHO Brush-B-Gon and Enforcer Brush Killer are effective undiluted for treating cut-
stumps and available in retail garden stores (safe to surrounding plants).
Saplings: Apply a basal spray to young bark using Garlon 4 as a 20-percent solution (5 pints per
3-gallon mix) in a labeled basal oil product, vegetable oil or mineral oil with a penetrant, or
fuel oil or diesel fuel (where permitted); or undiluted
Pathfinder II. Elsewhere, apply Stalker* as a 6- to 9-percent solution (1.5 to 2 pints per 3-gallon
mix) in a labeled basal oil product, vegetable oil, kerosene, or diesel fuel (where permitted).
Resprouts and seedlings: Thoroughly wet all leaves with one of the following herbicides in
water with a surfactant:
From June to August, either Escort XP at 1 ounce per acre (0.2 ounces per 3-gallon mix) plus a

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 30 December 12, 2018
Invasive
Vegetation
Species
Recommended Removal Technique
glyphosate herbicide as a 2-percent solution addition (8 ounces per 3-gallon mix) or Milestone
VM Plus at 6 to 9 pints per acre (1.5 to 3 pints per 3-gallon mix and 10 gallons per acre).
From July to September, Transline* † or Milestone as a 0.25-percent solution plus Garlon 3A
as a 4-percent solution (1 ounce plus 5 ounces per 3-gallon mix).
Princess Tree
(Paulownia
tomentosa)
Foliar Spray Method: This method should be considered for large thickets of paulownia
seedlings where risk to non-target species is minimal. Air temperature should be above 65°F
to ensure absorption of herbicides.
Glyphosate: Apply a 2% solution of glyphosate and water plus a 0.5% non-ionic surfactant to
thoroughly wet all leaves. Use a low pressure and coarse spray pattern to reduce spray drift
damage to non-target species. Glyphosate is a non-selective systemic herbicide that may kill
non-target partially-sprayed plants.
Triclopyr: Apply a 2% solution of triclopyr and water plus a 0.5% non-ionic surfactant to
thoroughly wet all leaves. Use a low pressure and coarse spray pattern to reduce spray drift
damage to non-target species. Triclopyr is a selective herbicide for broadleaf species. In areas
where desirable grasses are growing under or around paulownia, triclopyr can be used
without non-target damage.
Cut Stump Method: This control method should be considered when treating individual trees
or where the presence of desirable species precludes foliar application. Stump treatments can
be used if the ground is not frozen.
Glyphosate: Horizontally cut stems at or near ground level. Immediately apply a 25% solution
of glyphosate and water to the cut stump making sure to cover the outer 50% of the stump.
Triclopyr: Horizontally cut stems at or near ground level. Immediately apply a 50% solution of
triclopyr and water to the cut stump making sure to cover the outer 20% of the stump.
https://www.se-eppc.org/manual/princess.html
7.9 Site Constraints
A 200-foot-wideoverhead transmission power right-of-way crosses Antioch Tributary Reach 5. A 30-foot-
wide overhead electric easement crosses the site upstream of Ironwood Tributary and at Magnolia
Tributary Reach 2. No credits are claimed in these utility easements.
There are ten internal crossings proposed on the project site. Each crossing allows for connectivity and
access for the landowner. Crossings on the west side of the site will not be fenced since adjacent fields
are used for agricultural crop production and not cattle grazing pasture. The crossings are outlined in
Table 12 and numbered on Figures 9A and 9B. Each internal easement crossing is 60 feet wide, except
for Crossing 7 under the OHE transmission ROW which is 200 feet wide. No credits are claimed for
stream alignments within these crossing locations.
Table 12: Summary of Site Internal Easement Crossings
Internal
Easement
Crossing
Location Type
1 SF Fishing Reach 4 Existing bridge to remain. Fenced and gated with barn to remain.
2 Chicken Tributary Reach 2 New culvert and cattle guard, no fence.
3 Chicken Tributary 1 Reach 1 Replace existing culvert. Fenced and gated.
4 Critcher Tributary Reach 4 New ford crossing. Gated.
5 Antioch Tributary Reach 4 Replace culvert. Gated.
6 Antioch Tributary A Replace culvert. Gated.
7 SF Fishing Creek Reach 6 Ford crossing under OHE transmission ROW. Fenced and gated.

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 31 December 12, 2018
Internal
Easement
Crossing
Location Type
8 WF Fishing Reach 4 Improve existing culvert crossing. No fence.
9 Timber Tributary Reach 2 Existing culvert to remain. No fence.
10 SF Fishing Creek Reach 10 Existing culvert to remain. No fence.
7.10 Project Risk and Uncertainties
Due to the rural nature of the watershed, there is little risk that changes in land use upstream in the
project watershed would alter the hydrology or sediment supply enough to damage the project streams
after construction.
The primary concerns that have been identified for this site include:
• Restoration of headwater channel networks using a Priority 1 approach involves filling
headwater seep channels to raise their elevation and reconnect them to their bankfull bench
features. It will take time for the water table to rebound to the new base level and to support
stream functions – existing perennial features may become intermittent;
• The shear stress and stream power in the steep gradient and narrow valley stream reaches must
be accounted for with the addition of stable grade control;
• The transition of sustainable sediment transport through steep gradient reaches into flatter
reaches in the receiving streams’ floodplains;
• The larger drainage area and size of SF and WF of Fishing Creek creates a higher risk during the
first few years following construction when deep-rooted vegetation is reestablishing in these
reaches; and
• The potential for erosion and sediment inputs from agricultural production areas outside the
easement area or upstream of the project adversely affecting the restored stream network.
To address these concerns, headwater streams have been designed with grade control as a primary
consideration, and grade control structures have been designed and sized to ensure their proper
function and longevity. Likewise, stream structures and vegetative measures along larger stream
reaches have been addressed to protect the project during the recovery phase following construction.
Appropriate targets for stream morphology, and stable cross sections with relatively high width-to-
depth ratios and low bank height ratios will be established throughout the project area. On alluvial
channels, and larger channels, this will spread flood flows onto the adjacent floodplains to dissipate
energy and limit shear stresses within the main channel. Storm water detention BMPs have been sited
at the upstream headwaters of several of the project reaches to trap sediment runoff from adjacent
agricultural production fields. Boulder cascade BMPs have been located on non-jurisdictional
concentrated flow locations to stabilize gullies, dissipate energy, and step water down to the valley floor
landscape position where headwater stream restoration begins.
8.0 Site Protection Instrument
The land required for construction, management, and stewardship of the Site includes portions of the
parcels listed in Table 13. Conservation easements will be recorded on the parcels and include the
project streams along with a minimum 30-foot width of corresponding riparian buffer. The deed book
and page numbers listed in the table are for the options to purchase the conservation easements. All
conservation easements require 60-day advance notification to the USACE prior to any action to void,
amend, or modify the document. No such action shall take place unless approved by the USACE and IRT.
Copies of the conservation easements and plats will be submitted to the USACE immediately upon

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 32 December 12, 2018
recordation in the Wilkes County Register of Deeds. A copy of the Site Protection Instrument templet is
provided in Appendix 1.
Table 13: Site Protection Instrument
Site Landowner PIN County
Deed Book
and Page
Number
Address
Conservation
Easement
Area (acres)
Critcher Brothers
Mitigation Site
Critcher Brothers
Produce, Inc. 3898-75-5006 Wilkes 1250-234 502 Robin Hill Road,
Roaring River, NC 68.3
Jeffrey Bryan
Keller and Jason
Bartlett Keller
3898-95-2202,
4808-05-1674 Wilkes 1252-323 Antioch Church Road
Roaring River, NC 4.3
9.0 Determination of Credits
Use of credits from the Bank to offset stream impacts authorized by federal permits or state water
quality certifications must be in compliance with the Clean Water Act, Section 404(b)(1) guidelines and
other applicable state and federal legislation, regulations, and policies. Prior to the release of credits,
the following requirements will be met: IRT approval of the final Mitigation Plan and execution of the
banking instrument, recordation of the conservation easement, and establishment of appropriate
financial assurances. The Site is proposed to provide 20,891 cool stream credits. A summary of the
proposed credits is included in Table 14.
Table 14: Project Asset Table
Stream
Name Reach Management
Activity
Credit
Ratio Start Sta End Sta
Reach
Length
(LF)
Length
impacted
by
crossings
(LF)
Net
Length
(LF)
Stream
Credits
Magnolia
Trib 2 EI 1.5 811+51 815+95 444 30 414 276
West
Fork
Fishing
Creek
3 EI 1.5 711+66 717+66 600 0 600 400
West
Fork
Fishing
Creek
4 EI 1.5 717+66 724+76 710 60 650 433
West
Fork
Fishing
Creek
5 EI 1.5 724+76 731+71 695 0 695 463
Antioch
Trib 1 EII 2.5 300+00 301+85 185 0 185 74
Antioch
Trib A 1 EII 2.5 340+00 347+30 730 0 730 292
Antioch
Trib A1 EII 2.5 340+00 341+78 178 0 178 71
Antioch
Trib B 1 EII 2.5 350+00 354+48 448 0 448 179

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 33 December 12, 2018
Stream
Name Reach Management
Activity
Credit
Ratio Start Sta End Sta
Reach
Length
(LF)
Length
impacted
by
crossings
(LF)
Net
Length
(LF)
Stream
Credits
Antioch
Trib B1 EII 2.5 370+00 374+43 443 0 443 177
Antioch
Trib C EII 2.5 385+00 386+22 122 0 122 49
Chicken
Trib 1 1 EII 4 400+07 407+60 753 72 681 170
Chicken
Trib 1A EII 2.5 422+49 433+04 1,055 0 1,055 422
South
Fork
Fishing
Creek
1 EII 2.5 100+49 106+46 597 0 597 239
South
Fork
Fishing
Creek
4 EII 4 123+29 127+45 416 118 298 75
South
Fork
Fishing
Creek
9 EII 2.5 159+26 165+14 588 61 527 211
Ironwood
Trib 2 P 7.5 1007+16 1007+88 72 0 72 10
Ironwood
Trib 2 P 7.5 1007+88 1008+01 13 0 13 2
Ironwood
Trib 2 P 7.5 1008+01 1008+05 4 0 4 1
Ironwood
Trib 2 P 7.5 1008+05 1009+26 121 0 121 16
Magnolia
Trib 1 P 7.5 801+74 811+51 977 0 977 130
Shew
Ridge
Trib
1 P 7.5 901+41 906+93 552 0 552 74
Shew
Ridge
Trib
1 P 7.5 906+93 906+96 3 0 3 0
Shew
Ridge
Trib
1 P 7.5 906+96 907+09 13 0 13 2
Shew
Ridge
Trib
1 P 7.5 907+09 907+22 13 0 13 2
Shew
Ridge
Trib
1 P 7.5 907+22 907+25 3 0 3 0

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 34 December 12, 2018
Stream
Name Reach Management
Activity
Credit
Ratio Start Sta End Sta
Reach
Length
(LF)
Length
impacted
by
crossings
(LF)
Net
Length
(LF)
Stream
Credits
Shew
Ridge
Trib
1 P 7.5 907+25 910+34 309 0 309 41
Shew
Ridge
Trib A
P 7.5 950+44 952+03 159 0 159 21
Shew
Ridge
Trib A
P 7.5 952+03 952+28 25 0 25 3
Shew
Ridge
Trib A
P 7.5 952+28 952+32 4 0 4 1
Shew
Ridge
Trib A
P 7.5 952+32 952+81 49 0 49 7
Shew
Ridge
Trib A
P 7.5 952+81 953+80 99 0 99 13
Shew
Ridge
Trib A
P 7.5 953+80 953+83 3 0 3 0
Shew
Ridge
Trib A
P 7.5 953+83 954+55 72 0 72 10
Timber
Trib 1 P 7.5 1100+81 1113+77 1,296 0 1,296 173
Timber
Trib A P 7.5 1150+11 1151+15 104 0 104 14
Antioch
Trib 2 R 1 301+85 307+03 518 0 518 518
Antioch
Trib 3 R 1 307+03 313+09 606 0 606 606
Antioch
Trib 4 R 1 313+09 317+54 445 60 385 385
Antioch
Trib A 2 R 1 347+30 349+29 199 63 136 136
Antioch
Trib B 2 R 1 354+48 358+38 390 0 390 390
Chicken
Trib 1 2 R 1 407+60 415+56 796 61 735 735
Critcher
Trib D R 1 260+00 261+32 132 0 132 132
Critcher
Trib 1 R 1 200+00 202+07 207 0 207 207
Critcher
Trib 2 R 1 202+07 204+73 266 0 266 266

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 35 December 12, 2018
Stream
Name Reach Management
Activity
Credit
Ratio Start Sta End Sta
Reach
Length
(LF)
Length
impacted
by
crossings
(LF)
Net
Length
(LF)
Stream
Credits
Critcher
Trib 3 R 1 204+73 216+28 1,155 0 1,155 1,155
Critcher
Trib 4 R 1 216+28 221+13 485 61 424 424
Critcher
Trib A R 1 240+00 248+86 886 0 886 886
Critcher
Trib C R 1 270+03 271+20 117 0 117 117
Ironwood
Trib 1 R 1 1001+94 1007+16 522 0 522 522
Oak Trib R 1 600+71 606+54 583 0 583 583
Robin Hill
Trib 1 R 1 500+79 507+84 705 0 705 705
Robin Hill
Trib 2 R 1 507+84 512+35 451 0 451 451
Robin Hill
Trib A R 1 550+62 552+17 155 0 155 155
Robin Hill
Trib B R 1 575+93 578+28 235 0 235 235
Shew
Ridge
Trib
2 R 1 910+34 913+44 310 0 310 310
South
Fork
Fishing
Creek
2 R 1 106+46 114+75 829 0 829 829
South
Fork
Fishing
Creek
3 R 1 114+75 123+29 854 0 854 854
South
Fork
Fishing
Creek
5 R 1 127+45 139+02 1,157 205 952 952
South
Fork
Fishing
Creek
6 R 1 139+02 144+28 526 0 526 526
South
Fork
Fishing
Creek
7 R 1 144+28 151+07 679 0 679 679
South
Fork
Fishing
Creek
8 R 1 151+07 159+26 819 0 819 819

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 36 December 12, 2018
Stream
Name Reach Management
Activity
Credit
Ratio Start Sta End Sta
Reach
Length
(LF)
Length
impacted
by
crossings
(LF)
Net
Length
(LF)
Stream
Credits
South
Fork
Fishing
Creek
10 R 1 165+14 168+60 346 0 346 346
South
Fork
Fishing
Creek
11 R 1 168+60 179+52 1,092 0 1,092 1,092
Timber
Trib 2 R 1 1113+77 1122+58 881 60 821 821
West
Fork
Fishing
Creek
1 R 1 701+62 708+85 723 0 723 723
West
Fork
Fishing
Creek
2 R 1 708+85 711+66 281 0 281 281
Total 29,204 28,353 20,891

The 2012 IRT guidance describes a range of 5:1 to 10:1 ratio as the allowable preservation ratio for
mitigation banks. For the stream preservation reach on Critcher Brothers a credit ratio of 7.5:1 is being
requested, due to the high quality headwater systems being preserved immediately upstream of
restoration and enhancement activities, protection from recent timbering activities observed on
adjacent streams, and the fact that this preservation directly protects from the primary stressors named
in the RBRP (habitat degradation from land-disturbing agricultural practices and timbering).
Enhancement I work proposed will include a combination of stream restoration and enhancement II
approaches or repairing bank erosion, raising the stream bed to connect the stream to its floodplain,
and adding structures for habitat improvements. Livestock will be excluded, where applicable, as part of
the Enhancement I approach. A credit ratio of 1.5:1 is proposed for enhancement I work.
Enhancement II work proposed includes combinations of the following activities: fencing out or
relocating livestock, enhancing riparian buffers through planting and invasive vegetation treatment,
isolated areas of bank grading, in-stream structure installation, and addressing deficient crossings or
relict agricultural infrastructure (e.g. farm roads) that detract from the function of streams or buffers.
Because the enhancement areas directly address RBRP-recommended cattle exclusion, tie together
large portions of the project, provide storm water BMP treatments on several reaches, provide
extensive aquatic and terrestrial habitat corridors as well as opportunity to improve water quality, a
credit ratio of 2.5:1 is being requested for most enhancement II reaches. The exceptions to this credit
ratio are SF Fishing Creek Reach 4 and Chicken Tributary Reach 1, which are being proposed at 4:1.
These two reaches are proposed for Enhancement II credit at a 4:1 ratio due to their current relatively
stable condition and the lesser degree of work proposed.
Restoration will include the design and implementation of a stable bankfull pattern, cross-section, and
profile. This work will involve hydrologic reconnection of the streams with their floodplains, the

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 37 December 12, 2018
implementation of instream structures, and the exclusion of livestock. Restoration reaches will have
their buffers planted and treated for invasive species. A credit ratio of 1:1 is being requested for all
restoration reaches.
10.0 Credit Release Schedule
All credit releases will be based on the total credit generated as reported by the as-built survey of the
Site. Under no circumstances shall any mitigation bank be debited until the necessary Department of
Army (DA) authorization has been received for its construction or the District Engineer (DE) has
otherwise provided written approval for the project in the case where no DA authorization is required
for construction of the mitigation project. The DE, in consultation with the IRT, will determine if
performance standards have been satisfied sufficiently to meet the requirements of the release
schedules below. In cases where some performance standards have not been met, credits may still be
released depending on the specifics of the case. Monitoring may be required to restart or be extended,
depending on the extent to which the site fails to meet the specified performance standard. The release
of project credits will be in compliance with the October 24, 2016 Wilmington District Stream and
Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update Guidance Document. The proposed credit release schedule is
shown in Table 15.
Table 15: Credit Release Schedule - Stream Credits
Credit Release
Milestone Credit Release Activity Interim
Release
Total
Released
1 Site Establishment ** 15% 15%
2 Completion of all initial physical and biological improvements made
pursuant to the Mitigation Plan 15% 30%
3 First year monitoring report demonstrates channels are stable and interim
performance standards have been met 10% 40%
4 Second year monitoring report demonstrates channels are stable and
interim performance standards have been met 10% 50%
5 Third year monitoring report demonstrates channels are stable and interim
performance standards have been met 10% 60%
6 Fourth year monitoring report demonstrates channels are stable and
interim performance standards have been met 5% 65%
(75%*)
7 Fifth year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are
being met 10% 75%
(85%*)
8 Sixth year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are
being met 5% 80%
(90%*)
9 Seventh year monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable,
performance standards have been met. 10% 90%
(100%*)
*A 10% reserve of credits to be held back until the bankfull event performance standard has been met.
** 100% release for preservation reach credits within Site.
10.1 Initial Allocation of Released Credits
The initial allocation of released credits is defined as Bank Establishment in the October 24, 2016
Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update Guidance Document. The
initial allocation can be released without prior written approval of the DE upon satisfactory completion
of the following activities:
a. Execution of the UMBI by the Sponsor and the USACE.
b. Approval of the Final Mitigation Plan.
c. The mitigation bank site must be secured.

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 38 December 12, 2018
d. Recordation of the conservation easement, as well as delivery of a title opinion that is
acceptable to the USACE.
e. Delivery of the financial assurances described in the Mitigation Plan.
f. 404 permit verification for construction of the site, if required.
For mitigation sites that include preservation-only credits, 100% of the preservation credits will be
released once the six activities listed above are complete.
10.2 Subsequent Credit Releases
All subsequent credit releases must be approved by the DE, in consultation with the IRT, based on a
determination that required performance standards have been achieved. For stream projects, a reserve
of 10% of a site’s total stream credits shall be released after four bankfull events for each restoration
reach have occurred in separate years, provided the channel is stable and all other performance
standards are met as described in Section 11. In the event that less than four bankfull events occur
during the monitoring period, release of these reserve credits shall be at the discretion of the IRT. As the
bank approaches milestones associated with the credit release, Wildlands will submit a request for
credit release to the DE along with documentation substantiating achievement of criteria required for
release to occur. This documentation will be included with the annual monitoring report.
11.0 Performance Standards
The stream performance standards for the project site will follow approved performance standards
presented in the NC IRT Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update
(10/24/2016). Annual monitoring and semi-annual site visits will be conducted to assess the condition of
the finished project. Specific performance standard components are proposed for stream morphology,
hydrology, and vegetation. Performance standards will be evaluated throughout the seven-year post-
construction monitoring.
11.1 Streams
11.1.1 Dimension
Riffle cross sections on the restoration reaches should be stable and should show little change in
bankfull area, and width-to-depth ratio. Per NC IRT guidance, bank height ratios shall not exceed 1.2 and
entrenchment ratios are expected to be less than 1.4 for cascade-pool A channels, at least 1.4 for
restored step pool B channels and at least 2.2 for restored meandering C and E channels. Riffle cross
sections should fall within the parameters defined for channels of the appropriate stream type. If any
changes do occur, these changes will be evaluated to assess whether the stream channel is showing
signs of instability. Indicators of instability include a vertically incising thalweg or eroding channel banks.
Changes in the channel that indicate a movement toward stability or enhanced habitat include a
decrease in the width-to-depth ratio in meandering channels or an increase in pool depth. Remedial
action would not be taken if channel changes indicate a movement toward stability.
11.1.2 Pattern and Profile
Visual assessments and photo documentation should indicate that streams are remaining stable and do
not indicate a trend toward vertical or lateral instability. Signs of instability may include bank scour,
bank migration, and bed incision.
11.1.3 Photo Documentation
Photographs should illustrate the site’s vegetation and morphological stability on an annual basis. Cross-
section photos should demonstrate no excessive erosion or degradation of the banks. Longitudinal
photos should indicate the absence of persistent bars within the channel and no vertical incision. Grade

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 39 December 12, 2018
control structures should remain stable. Deposition of sediment on the bank side of vane arms is
preferable. Maintenance of scour pools on the channel side of vane arms is expected.
11.1.4 Bankfull Events
The occurrence of bankfull events will be documented on restoration and enhancement I streams
throughout the monitoring period. Four bankfull flow events must be documented within the seven-
year monitoring period. The four bankfull events must occur in separate years. Stream monitoring will
continue until performance standards in the form of four bankfull events in separate years have been
documented. In addition, low flow/intermittent channels (Critcher Tributary Reach 1, Critcher Tributary
D, and Robin Hill Tributary Reach A) will each have a stream gage pressure transducer installed in upper
1/3 of reach to document 30 consecutive days of baseflow.
11.2 Vegetation
The final vegetative performance standard will be the survival of 210 planted stems per acre in the
planted riparian areas at the end of the required monitoring period (year seven). The interim measure of
vegetative success for the site will be the survival of at least 320 planted stems per acre at the end of
the third monitoring year and at least 260 stems per acre at the end of the fifth year of monitoring. It
should be noted that no single planted or volunteer species shall comprise more than 50% of the total
stem density within any plot at year three, five, or seven. Planted vegetation must average 7 feet in
height in each plot at the end of the fifth year of monitoring and 10 feet in height at Year 7. The extent
of invasive species coverage will also be monitored and controlled as necessary throughout the required
seven-year monitoring period.
11.3 Visual Assessments
Visual assessments should support the specific performance standards for each metric as described
above.
12.0 Monitoring Plan
Annual monitoring data will be reported in accordance with Regulatory Guidance Letter (RGL) 08-03.
The monitoring report shall provide project data chronology that will facilitate an understanding of
project status, trends, research purposes, and assist in decision making regarding close-out. The
monitoring period will extend seven years beyond completion of construction or until performance
criteria have been met. All survey will be georeferenced to North Carolina State Plane coordinates.
Using the RGL 08-03, a baseline monitoring document and as-built record drawings of the project will be
developed within 60 days of the planting completion and monitoring installation on the restored site.
Monitoring reports will be prepared in the fall of each year of monitoring and submitted to USACE no
later than April 1 of the year following monitoring. The monitoring plan is described in Table 16.
Table 16: Monitoring Plan
Goals Treatment Expected Outcomes Performance
Standard
Monitoring
Metric
Reduce
pollutant inputs
to streams
including fecal
coliform,
nitrogen, and
phosphorous.
Exclude cattle from streams and buffers
by installing fencing around
conservation easements adjacent to
cattle pastures and providing alternative
water sources or removing cattle from
sites. Remove riparian buffer areas from
agricultural production.
Reduction in
pollutant loads to
streams caused by
cattle access and
agricultural runoff.
Prevent easement
encroachment.
Visually inspect
the perimeter
of the site to
ensure no
easement
encroachment
is occurring.

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 40 December 12, 2018
Goals Treatment Expected Outcomes Performance
Standard
Monitoring
Metric
Reduce inputs
of sediment
into streams
from eroding
stream banks.
Reconstruct stream channels with
stable dimensions. Add bank
revetments and in-stream structures to
protect restored/enhanced streams.
Capture agricultural erosion in BMP
basins. Stabilize eroding gully features.
Reduction in
sediment loadings
to streams from
bank erosion.
Riffle cross sections
on the restoration
reaches should be
stable and should
show little change in
bankfull area, and
width-to-depth ratio.
Cross section
monitoring and
visual
inspections.
Return
networks of
streams to a
stable form that
is capable of
supporting
hydrologic,
biologic, and
water quality
functions.
Construct stream channels that will
maintain a stable pattern and profile
considering the hydrologic and
sediment inputs to the system, the
landscape setting, and the watershed
conditions.
Reduce shear stress
on channel
boundary. Support
all stream functions
above hydrology.
Entrenchment ratio
appropriate for
design stream type
and bank height ratio
below 1.2 with visual
assessments showing
progression towards
stability.
Cross section
monitoring and
visual
inspections.
Raise local
groundwater
elevations and
allow for more
frequent
overbank flows.
Reduce shear
stress on
channels during
larger flow
events.
Reconstruct stream channels with
appropriate bankfull dimensions and
depth relative to the existing floodplain.
Raise water table
and hydrate
riparian wetlands.
Allow flood flows to
disperse on the
floodplain. Support
Geomorphic and
higher level
functions.
Four recorded
bankfull events
within monitoring
period.
Crest gages
and/or
transducer on
restoration and
Enhancement I
sections
documenting
flow.
Improve
aquatic habitat
in project
streams.
Install habitat features such as
constructed riffles, cover logs, and
brush toe into restored/enhanced
streams. Add woody materials to
channel beds. Construct pools of varying
depth.
Increase and
diversify available
habitats for
macroinvertebrates,
fish, and
amphibians leading
to colonization and
increase in
biodiversity over
time. Add
complexity
including LWD to
the streams.

N/A N/A

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 41 December 12, 2018
Goals Treatment Expected Outcomes Performance
Standard
Monitoring
Metric
Create and
improve
riparian
habitats.
Provide a
canopy to
shade streams
and reduce
thermal
loadings. Create
a source of
woody inputs
for streams.
Reduce flood
flow velocities
on floodplain
and improve
long-term
lateral stability
of streams.
Plant native tree and understory species
in riparian zone.
Reduce sediment
inputs from bank
erosion and runoff.
Increase nutrient
cycling and storage
in floodplain.
Provide riparian
habitat. Add a
source of LWD and
organic material to
stream. Support all
stream functions.
In open areas
planted; Survival of
210 planted stems
per acre at MY7.
Interim survival of at
least 320 planted
stems at MY3 and at
least 260 planted
stems per acre at
MY5. No success
criteria is associated
with shaded area
planting.
Permanent and
mobile 100
square meter
vegetation
plots within
planted open
areas. Shaded
areas planted
will be visual
assessed.
Ensure that
development
and agricultural
uses that would
damage the site
or reduce the
benefits of
project are
prevented.
Establish conservation easements on
the site.
Protection of the
site from harmful
uses in perpetuity.
Prevent easement
encroachment.
Visually inspect
the perimeter
of the site to
insure no
easement
encroachment
is occurring.

12.1 Monitoring Components
Project monitoring components are listed in more detail in Tables 17-22. Approximate locations of the
proposed vegetation plots and crest/stream gage monitoring components are illustrated in Figures 10A
and 10B.

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 42 December 12, 2018
Table 17: Monitoring Components – South Fork Fishing Creek
Parameter Monitoring
Feature
Quantity/Length by Reach
Frequency Notes SF
Fishing
R1
SF
Fishing
R2
SF
Fishing
R3
SF
Fishing
R4
SF
Fishing
R5
SF
Fishing
R6
SF
Fishing
R7
SF
Fishing
R8
SF
Fishing
R9
SF
Fishing
R10
SF
Fishing
R11
Dimension
Riffle Cross-
sections N/A 1 1 N/A 2 1 1 1 N/A 1 1 Year 1, 2,
3, 5, and 7 1 Pool Cross-
sections N/A 1 1 N/A 1 0 1 0 N/A 0 1
Pattern Pattern N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
2 Profile Longitudinal
Profile N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Substrate
Reach wide
(RW) Pebble
Count
N/A 1 1 N/A 1 1 1 1 N/A 1 1 Year 1, 2,
3, 5, and 7 3
Hydrology
Crest Gage
(CG) and/or
Transducer
(SG)
N/A 1 N/A 1 N/A 1 Semi-
Annual 4
Vegetation
CVS Level
2/Mobile
Plots
25 (Total) Year 1, 2,
3, 5, and 7 5
Visual
Assessment Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Semi-
Annual
Exotic and
nuisance
vegetation
Semi-
Annual 6
Project
Boundary Semi-
Annual 7
Reference
Photos Photographs 19 Annual

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 43 December 12, 2018
Table 18: Monitoring Components – Critcher Tributaries

Parameter Monitoring
Feature
Quantity/Length by Reach
Frequency Notes Critcher
Tributary
R1
Critcher
Tributary
R2
Critcher
Tributary
R3
Critcher
Tributary
R4
Critcher
Tributary
A
Critcher
Tributary
C
Critcher
Tributary
D
Dimension
Riffle Cross-
sections 1 1 2 1 1 1 1
Year 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 1 Pool Cross-
sections 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
Pattern Pattern N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
2 Profile Longitudinal
Profile N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Substrate
Reach wide
(RW) Pebble
Count
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Year 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 3
Hydrology
Crest Gage
(CG) and/or
Transducer
(SG)
1 1 1 1 Semi-Annual 4
Vegetation
CVS Level
2/Mobile
Plots
25 (Total) Year 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 5
Visual
Assessment Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Semi-Annual
Exotic and
nuisance
vegetation
Semi-Annual 6
Project
Boundary Semi-Annual 7
Reference
Photos Photographs 10 Annual

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 44 December 12, 2018
Table 19: Monitoring Components – Antioch Tributaries
Parameter Monitoring
Feature
Quantity/Length by Reach
Frequency Notes Antioch
Tributary
R1
Antioch
Tributary
R2
Antioch
Tributary
R3
Antioch
Tributary
R4
Antioch
Tributary
A R1
Antioch
Tributary
A R2
Antioch
Tributary
A1
Antioch
Tributary
B R1
Antioch
Tributary
B R2
Antioch
Tributary
B1
Antioch
Tributary
C
Dimension
Riffle Cross-
sections N/A 1 1 1 N/A 1 N/A N/A 1 N/A N/A Year 1, 2,
3, 5, and 7 1 Pool Cross-
sections N/A 0 0 0 N/A 0 N/A N/A 0 N/A N/A
Pattern Pattern N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
2 Profile Longitudinal
Profile N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Substrate
Reach wide
(RW) Pebble
Count
N/A 1 1 1 N/A 1 N/A N/A 1 N/A N/A Year 1, 2,
3, 5, and 7 3
Hydrology
Crest Gage
(CG) and/or
Transducer
(SG)
N/A 1 N/A 1 N/A N/A 1 N/A N/A Semi-
Annual 4
Vegetation
CVS Level
2/Mobile
Plots
25 (Total) Year 1, 2,
3, 5, and 7 5
Visual
Assessment Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Semi-
Annual
Exotic and
nuisance
vegetation
Semi-
Annual 6
Project
Boundary Semi-
Annual 7
Reference
Photos Photographs 11 Annual

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 45 December 12, 2018
Table 20: Monitoring Components – Chicken, Robin Hill, Oak Tributaries
Parameter Monitoring
Feature
Quantity/Length by Reach
Frequency Notes Chicken
Tributary
1 R1
Chicken
Tributary
1 R2
Chicken
Tributary
1A
Robin
Hill
Tributary
R1
Robin
Hill
Tributary
R2
Robin
Hill
Tributary
A
Robin
Hill
Tributary
B
Oak
Tributary
Dimension
Riffle Cross-
sections N/A 2 N/A 1 1 1 1 1 Year 1, 2, 3,
5, and 7 1 Pool Cross-
sections N/A 1 N/A 1 0 0 0 0
Pattern Pattern N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
2 Profile Longitudinal
Profile N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Substrate
Reach wide
(RW) Pebble
Count
N/A 1 N/A 1 1 1 1 1 Year 1, 2, 3,
5, and 7 3
Hydrology
Crest Gage
(CG) and/or
Transducer
(SG)
N/A 1 N/A 1 1 1 1 Semi-Annual 4
Vegetation
CVS Level
2/Mobile
Plots
25 (Total) Year 1, 2, 3,
5, and 7 5
Visual
Assessment Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Semi-Annual
Exotic and
nuisance
vegetation
Semi-Annual 6
Project
Boundary Semi-Annual 7
Reference
Photos Photographs 11 Annual

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 46 December 12, 2018
Table 21: Monitoring Components – West Fork Fishing Creek
Parameter Monitoring
Feature
Quantity/Length by Reach Frequency Notes
WF Fishing R1 WF Fishing R2 WF Fishing R3 WF Fishing R4 WF Fishing R5
Dimension
Riffle Cross-
sections 1 1 1 1 1
Year 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 1 Pool Cross-
sections 1 0 0 0 0
Pattern Pattern N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
2 Profile Longitudinal
Profile N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Substrate
Reach wide
(RW) Pebble
Count
1 1 1 1 1 Year 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 3
Hydrology
Crest Gage
(CG) and/or
Transducer
(SG)
1 Semi-Annual 4
Vegetation
CVS Level
2/Mobile
Plots
25 (Total) Year 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 5
Visual
Assessment Y Y Y Y Y Semi-Annual
Exotic and
nuisance
vegetation
Semi-Annual 6
Project
Boundary Semi-Annual 7
Reference
Photos Photographs 9 Annual

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 47 December 12, 2018
Table 22: Monitoring Components – Magnolia, Shew Ridge, Ironwood, Timber Tributaries
Parameter Monitoring
Feature
Quantity/Length by Reach
Frequency Notes Magnolia
Tributary
R1
Magnolia
Tributary
R2
Shew
Ridge
Tributary
R1
Shew
Ridge
Tributary
R2
Shew
Ridge
Tributary
A
Ironwood
Tributary
R1
Ironwood
Tributary
R2
Timber
Tributary
R1
Timber
Tributary
R2
Timber
Tributary
A
Dimension
Riffle Cross-
sections N/A 1 N/A 1 N/A 1 N/A N/A 1 N/A Year 1, 2,
3, 5, and 7 1 Pool Cross-
sections N/A 1 N/A 1 N/A 0 N/A N/A 1 N/A
Pattern Pattern N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
2 Profile Longitudinal
Profile N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Substrate
Reach wide
(RW) Pebble
Count
N/A 1 N/A 1 N/A 1 N/A N/A 1 N/A Year 1, 2,
3, 5, and 7 3
Hydrology
Crest Gage
(CG) and/or
Transducer
(SG)
N/A 1 N/A 1 N/A 1 N/A N/A 1 N/A Semi-
Annual 4
Vegetation
CVS Level
2/Mobile
Plots
25 (Total) Year 1, 2,
3, 5, and 7 5
Visual
Assessment N/A Y N/A Y N/A Y N/A N/A Y Y Semi-
Annual
Exotic and
nuisance
vegetation
Semi-
Annual 6
Project
Boundary Semi-
Annual 7
Reference
Photos Photographs 13 Annual

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 48 December 12, 2018

Table Notes:
1. Cross sections will be permanently marked with rebar to establish location. Surveys will include points measured at all breaks in slope, including top of bank, bankfull,
edge of water, and thalweg.
2. Pattern and profile will be assessed visually during semi-annual site visits. Longitudinal profile will be collected during as-built baseline monitoring survey only, unless
observations indicate widespread lack of vertical stability (greater than 10% of reach is affected) and profile survey is warranted in additional years to monitor
adjustments or survey repair work.
3. Riffle 100-count substrate sampling will be collected during the baseline monitoring only. Substrate assessments in subsequent monitoring years will consist of
reachwide substrate monitoring.
4. Crest gages and/or transducers will be inspected quarterly or semi-annually, evidence of bankfull events will be documented with a photo when possible. Transducers,
if used, will be set to record stage once every 2 hours. The transducer will be inspected and downloaded semi-annually.
5. Both mobile and permanent vegetation plots will be utilized to evaluate the vegetation performance for the open areas planted. 2% of the open planted acreage will be
monitored with permanent plots and mobile plots. Permanent vegetation monitoring plot assessments will follow CVS Level 2 protocols. Mobile vegetation monitoring
plot assessments will document number of planted stems and species using a circular or 100 m2 square/rectangular plot. Planted shaded areas will be visually assessed.
6. Locations of exotic and nuisance vegetation will be mapped.
7. Locations of vegetation damage, boundary encroachments, etc. will be mapped.

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 49 December 12, 2018
13.0 Adaptive Management and Maintenance Plan
The Site shall be monitored on a regular basis and a physical inspection of the site shall be conducted at
a minimum of once per year throughout the post-construction monitoring period until performance
standards are met. These site inspections may identify site components and features that require
routine maintenance. Routine maintenance should be expected most often in the first two years
following site construction and may include the items listed in Table 23.
Table 23: Adaptive Management and Maintenance Plan
Component /
Feature Adaptive Management through project close-out
Stream
Routine channel maintenance and repair activities may include chinking of in-stream
structures to prevent piping, securing loose coir matting, and supplemental installations of
live stakes and other target vegetation along the channel. Areas where stormwater and
floodplain flows intercept the channel may also require adaptive management to prevent
bank failures and head-cutting. Beaver dams that inundate the streams channels shall be
removed and the beaver shall be trapped.
Vegetation
Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and vigor of the targeted community.
Routine vegetation adaptive management and repair activities may include supplemental
planting, pruning, mulching, and fertilizing. Exotic invasive plant species affecting the
viability of the mitigation shall be controlled by mechanical and/or chemical methods. Any
vegetation control requiring herbicide application will be performed in accordance with the
NC Department of Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations.
Site Boundary
Site boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the bank
site and adjacent properties. Boundaries may be identified by fence, marker, bollard, post,
tree-blazing, or other means as allowed by site conditions and/or conservation easement.
Boundary markers disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or replaced on an
as-needed basis.
Upon completion of site construction, the Sponsor will implement the post-construction monitoring
protocols and adaptive management will be performed as needed for the duration of the monitoring
period. The Sponsor will notify the USACE immediately if monitoring results or visual observations
suggest a trend towards instability, major remedial actions are needed, or that performance standards
cannot be achieved. Should major remedial measures be required, the Sponsor will submit a Corrective
Action Plan and coordinate with the USACE until authorization is secured to conduct the adaptive
management activities. The Sponsor is responsible for funding and/or providing the services necessary
to secure any necessary permits to support the proposed major remedial adaptive management actions,
to implement the corrective action plan, and to deliver record drawings that depict the extent and
nature of the work performed. If the USACE determines that the Bank is not meeting performance
standards or the Sponsor is not complying with the terms of the instrument, the USACE may take
appropriate actions, including but not limited to: suspending credit sales, utilizing financial assurances,
and/or terminating the instrument.

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 50 December 12, 2018

14.0 Long-Term Management Plan
14.1 Ownership and Long-Term Manager
The Site will remain in private ownership, protected in its entirety, and managed under the terms
detailed in the conservation easement. Unique Places to Save (UP2Save) will serve as the Grantee and
long-term manager and will be the party responsible for long-term management. The conservation
easement will be transferred to UP2Save prior to the initial credit release.
UP2Save is a 501c3 non-profit organization that is committed to land conservation through sustainable
planning and management. UP2Save has the ability, both logistically and financially, to monitor and
enforce the provisions of the conservation easement and long-term management plan. The organization
operates in a sustainable manner to facilitate operations well into the future. UP2Save has been
approved to serve as the easement holder and long-term manager on several mitigation banks in North
Carolina, including the Hoosier Dam and Box Creek projects. Additional qualifications and UP2Save’s
annual report can be provided upon request.
14.2 Long-Term Management Activities
The stream systems within the Site have been modeled after natural, functioning, and stable Piedmont
systems. Natural materials (e.g., wood, native transplants, etc.) and practices have been incorporated
into the design based on features observed and data gathered at reference sites. The design approach
and best construction methods will provide a stable regime while on-site vegetation, the stream
channel, and the adjacent wetland and floodplain habitats mature. Monitoring will be conducted for
seven years following construction to ensure that the mitigation site develops the dynamic equilibrium
and stability of a natural system. This deliberate design and monitoring approach is intended to promote
a self-sustaining stream and riparian system and to reduce long-term management activities. However,
long-term management activities have been identified to ensure that the mitigation site is maintained
and protected following the monitoring period.
Prior to the initial credit release and following authorization of the Mitigation Banking Instrument, the
Site will be protected in perpetuity with a conservation easement. Following the issuance of the
closeout letter (i.e., final determination of success), long-term management activities will be conducted
to ensure the site remains perpetually monitored. The long-term manager will be responsible for
inspecting the protected area annually and for conducting the long-term management activities
described in Table 24 as necessary to rectify identified deficiencies. The restrictions and long-term
management responsibilities will convey with the land, should the property be transferred in the future.
The long-term manager will be responsible for periodic inspection of the site to ensure that the
restrictions documented in the recorded easement are upheld.
Table 24: Long-term Management Plan
Long-Term Management Activity Long-Term Manager Responsibility Landowner Responsibility
Where livestock are present, a fence
will be installed and maintained
along the conservation easement
boundary to prevent livestock from
accessing the Site.
The long-term steward (or
manager) will be responsible for
inspecting for and reporting
livestock intrusion to the
landowner(s).
The landowner(s) will be responsible
for inspecting the and maintaining the
fence and excluding livestock from the
conservation easement area.

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 51 December 12, 2018
Long-Term Management Activity Long-Term Manager Responsibility Landowner Responsibility
Signage will be installed and
maintained along the Site boundary
to denote the area protected by the
recorded conservation easement.
The long-term steward will be
responsible for inspecting the Site
boundary and for maintaining or
replacing signage to ensure that the
conservation easement area is
clearly marked.
The landowner(s) shall report damaged
or missing signs to the long-term
manager, as well as contact the long-
term manager if a boundary needs to
be marked, or clarification is needed
regarding a boundary location.
The mitigation site will be protected
in its entirety and managed under
the terms outlined in the recorded
conservation easement.
The long-term manager will be
responsible for conducting annual
inspections and for undertaking
actions that are reasonably
calculated to swiftly correct the
conditions constituting a breach.
The USACE, and their authorized
agents, shall have the right to enter
and inspect the Site and to take
actions necessary to verify
compliance with the conservation
easement.
The landowner(s) shall contact the
long-term manager if clarification is
needed regarding the restrictions
associated with the recorded
conservation easement.

14.3 Funding Mechanism
Anticipated long-term management activities and their associated annual cost are listed in the table
below. Wildlands will fund a stewardship endowment that will be managed by UP2Save. UP2Save’s
endowment is designated to provide on-going revenue to support long-term management activities. The
stewardship endowment is invested to provide recurring revenue to cover the cost of anticipated annual
activities, easement defense, and violation resolution.
The total stewardship endowment was calculated based on the information listed in Table 25 below.
The level of effort is listed in hours or as a lump sum, defined as LS. The cost per unit or labor rate and
anticipated frequency are listed and were utilized to calculate the total and annual activity cost. For
example, the steward anticipates four hours of staff time at a rate of $50 per hour to support adjacent
landowner coordination, which may consist of coordinating with current and adjacent landowners to
ensure access and maintain relationships and scheduling site visits. A conservative (lower than
anticipated) rate of return (or capitalization rate) of 4.50% and the estimated annual costs of the
identified management activities were utilized to determine the endowment funding requirement.

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 52 December 12, 2018
Table 25: Management Funding
Management Activity Level of
Effort
Cost per
Unit Anticipated Frequency Activity
Cost
Annual
Cost
Annual Activities
Annual Planning 2 $50 Annual $100 $100
Adjacent Landowner Coordination 2 $50 Annual $100 $100
Field Inspection, Inventory and
Documentation 4 $50 Annual $200 $200
Annual Report to Board 2 $50 Annual $100 $100
Vehicle and supplies 1 $150 Annual $150 $150
Adaptive Management
Trash Removal & Disposal 5 $25 Annual $125 $125
Sign Maintenance 5 $25 Every five (5) years $125 $25
Minor Violation 1 $4,500 Every ten (10) years $4,500 $450
Major Violation 1 $14,000 Every twenty (20) years $12,000 $600
Total Annual Cost $1,850
Capitalization Rate 4.50%
Funding Amount $41,111
15.0 Financial Assurances
Financial assurances will be provided in the form of insurance for the activities specified in this plan. The
insurance will assure performance of construction and monitoring work to restore, enhance and/or
preserve the project aquatic resources. The principal amount of the insurance will be based on Table 20.
Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC will serve as the Principal and Nautilus Insurance Company will serve as the
Surety. In the event that the Principal fails to meet the conditions of the insurance obligation, the surety
may fulfill the principal’s obligations either by performing those obligations up to the limit of the penal
sum, or by paying an amount up to the penal sum (less any costs already incurred by the surety) into a
standby trust or to a willing party acceptable to the USACE, who would develop a proposal to fulfill the
mitigation obligations. The insurance will stipulate that any insurance payouts be made payable to an
established third party. Unique Places to Save (UP2Save) is to serve as the third party for this Mitigation
Bank. At such time as funds are distributed to UP2Save, they will become a surety to the insurance.
Financial assurances will not be structured to provide funds to the USACE in the event of default by the
Principal (Sponsor). The USACE will be notified a minimum of 120 days prior to termination of financial
assurances. A letter from UP2Save acknowledging their third party status is located in Appendix 8.
Insurance will be phased to allow coverage through the monitoring period. Insurance covering
construction will be provided after the MBI is approved and prior to the initial credit release. The
casualty insurance will be retired upon submittal of the final as-built report to the DE. The initial term of
the insurance policy will be 15 months and will include an option to renew the policy for a term not to
exceed one year to cover site construction. The principal amount of the construction insurance will be
calculated based on the remaining cost to complete engineering, permitting, and construction activities
as described in Table 26. Note, the cost of recording easements will not be included in the construction
insurance as this process will be complete at the time the insurance is submitted to the USACE.
Following retirement of the construction insurance, insurance for annual monitoring will be utilized to
cover anticipated monitoring and adaptive management costs. Insurance will be structured to provide
continuous coverage through a single policy that will decrement in value each year according to Table

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 53 December 12, 2018
26. Annual monitoring insurance will be submitted to the USACE upon approval of each previous year
monitoring report. The principal amount of monitoring insurance is calculated based on the total
estimated costs that remains through closeout, including monitoring and maintenance activities. Table
26 lists the proposed insurance principal amounts for each monitoring year.
Table 26: Financial Assurances Table
Category 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
Engineering $55,000
Legal $5,000
Construction $1,863,000
Planting $50,000
As-Built $40,000
Monitoring $18,000 $18,900 $19,845 $20,837 $21,879 $22,973 $24,122
Re-grading
Contingency $5,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000
Re-Planting
Contingency $5,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000
Beaver Control $0 $0 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500
Invasive Control $0 $2,000 $0 $2,000 $0 $2,000 $2,000
Easement Access
Control $750 $750 $750 $750 $750 $750 $750
Corps Admin
Costs $45,006 $4,746 $4,171 $3,738 $2,896 $2,394 $1,512 $967
Sub-Total $2,058,006 $33,496 $25,821 $45,833 $27,983 $46,524 $28,735 $49,339
Insurance
Principal $2,058,006 $257,732 $224,235 $198,414 $152,581 $124,598 $78,074 $49,339
Monitoring Phase Insurance

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan
Page 54 December 12, 2018
16.0 References
Andrews, E.D. 1984. Bed-material entrainment and hydraulic geometry of gravel-bed rivers in Colorado.
Geological Society of America Bulletin, 95, 371-378.
Bledsoe, B. P., C. C. Watson, D. S. Biedenharn, 2002. Quantification of Incised Channel Evolution and
Equilibrium. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38(3): 861-870.
Daniel, C.C., III, 1989, Statistical analysts relating well yield to construction practices and siting of wells in the
Piedmont and Blue Ridge provinces of North Carolina US Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2341-A,
27 p.
Dunne, T. and Leopold, L.B. 1978. Water in Environmental Planning. W.H. Freeman and Company, San
Francisco.
Harman, W.A. R. Starr, M. Carter, K. Tweedy, M. Clemmons, K. Suggs, C. Miller. 2012. A Function-Based
Framework for Stream Assessment and Restoration Projects. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Washington, DC. EPA 843-K-12-006.
Harman, W.H., G.D. Jennings, J.M. Patteson, D.R. Clinton, L.O. Slate, A.G. Jessup, J.R. Everhart, and
R.E. Smith. 1999. Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for North Carolina Streams. AWRA Wildland
Hydrology Symposium Proceedings. Edited By: D.S. Olsen and J.P. Potyondy. AWRA Summer Symposium.
Bozeman, MT.
North Carolina Geological Survey (NCGS), 1985. Geologic map of North Carolina 1:500,000 scale. Compiled by
Philip M. Brown at el. Raleigh, NC, NCGS.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP), 2009. Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Database,
Wilkes County, NC.
Rosgen, D.L. 2001. A stream channel stability assessment methodology. Proceedings of the Federal
Interagency Sediment Conference, Reno, NV, March 2001.
Scroggs, WC. Wilkes County Planning Department. Personal communication September 24, 2018.
Simon, A. 1989. A model of channel response in disturbed alluvial channels. Earth Surface Processes and
Landforms 14(1):11-26.
Shields, A. 1936. Application of Similarity Principles and Turbulence Research to Bed-Load Movement.
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena (Translate from German).
Shields, D. F., Copeland, R. R, Klingman, P. C., Doyle, M. W., and Simon, A. 2003. Design for Stream
Restoration. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 129(8): 575-582.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC), 2010. HEC-RAS River Analysis System
User’s Manual, Version 4.1. Accessed online at: http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec-
ras/documentation/HEC-RAS_4.1_Users_Manual.pdf
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 2014. Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal
Species of Concern and Candidate Species, Chatham County, NC.
http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/chatham.html
Walker, Alan, unpublished. NC Rural Mountain and Piedmont Regional Curve.
Weakley, A.S. 2008. Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, Northern Florida, and Surrounding Areas
(Draft April 2008). University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: Chapel Hill, NC.

^_
^_
^_
^_
§¨¦77
£¤21 §¨¦74
£¤421
£¤421
£¤601
£¤221
§¨¦77
Dugger CreekMitigation Site
Critcher BrothersMitigation Site
Plantation Branch Mitigation Site
White BuffaloMitigation Site
03040101
05050001
03040102
Elk
C
reek
R
o
arin
g
R
iv
e
r
Yad k i n R i v er
LongCr e ek
H u nting
Cree
k
Little B
uffalo Creek
N a k e d C r e e k Lovills Creek (Lovell Creek)Lovills Creek (Lovell Creek)Lovills Creek (Lovell Creek)Endicott Creek (Branch)
0 3.5 7 10.5 14 Miles ¹
County Boundaries
Municipalities
Hydrologic Unit Code (8 digit HUC)
Water Supply Watershed
NC Historic Preservation Areas
Significant Natural Heritage Areas
NC Natural Heritage Program Managed Areas
303d Listed Streams
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Yadkin River Basin (03040101)Surry, Watauga and Wilkes Counties, NC
Figure 2 Service Area Map
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Yadkin River Basin (03040101)
^_
^_
^_^_
§¨¦77
£¤421
£¤421
£¤52
§¨¦74
§¨¦77
§¨¦40
£¤321
§¨¦40
£¤64
£¤311
£¤52
£¤601
£¤21£¤221
£¤52
03040101010050
03040101060060
03040101090010
03040101090030
0 6.5 13 19.5 26 Miles
Service Area (Yadkin HUC 03040101)
14 Digit HUCs
Municipalities
¹
Dugger CreekMitigation Site
Critcher BrothersMitigation Site
Plantation Branch Mitigation Site
White BuffaloMitigation Site
Surry, Watauga and Wilkes Counties, NC
0 7 14 21 28 Miles ¹
County Boundaries
Bridge Project
Statewide Highway
Regional Highway
Division Highway
Statewide Aviation
Regional Aviation
Division Aviation
Division Ferry
Statewide Rail
Regional Rail
Division Rail
Other Rail
Regional Public Transit
Division Transit
Division Bike/Pedestrian
Other Highway
Statewide Highway
Regional Highway
Division Highway
Transition Highway
Other Highway
Division Bike/Pedestrian
Transition Rail
Figure 3 NCDOT STIP FY 2018-2027
Critcher Brothers Mitigat ion Site
Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigat ion Bank
Yadkin River Ba sin (03040101)
Dugger CreekMitigation Site
Critcher BrothersMitigation Site
Plantation Branch Mitigation Site
White B uffaloMitigation Site
Surry, Watauga a nd Wilkes Countie s, NC
Shew Ridge Trib
Timber Trib
Ironwood Trib
Magnolia Trib
Oak Trib
Antioch Trib A
Antioch Trib B
Critcher Tributary
Critcher Trib A
Lower SF Fishing Creek
Robin Hill Trib
Chicken Trib 1A
Chicken Trib 2
Robin Hill Trib A
Robin Hill Trib B
Antioch Trib A1
WF Fishing Creek
Chicken Trib 1
Critcher Trib D
Critcher Trib C
Antioch Trib C
Antioch Trib B1
Antioch Tributary
£¤421
£¤421
¹Figure 4 Watershed Map
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Yadkin River Basin (03040101)
Wilkes County, NC
2014 Aerial Photography
Watersheds
Project Streams
Non-project Streams
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 Feet
Name Acres
Antioch Trib 66
Antioch Trib A 20
Antioch Trib A1 7
Antioch Trib B 24
Antioch Trib B1 5
Antioch Trib C 1
Chicken Trib 1 444
Chicken Trib 1A 19
Chicken Trib 2 5
Critcher Trib 106
Critcher Trib A 59
Critcher Trib C 2
Critcher Trib D 5
Ironwood Trib 19
Lower SF Fishing Creek 3942
Magnolia Trib 202
Oak Trib 24
Robin Hill Trib 24
Robin Hill Trib A 4
Robin Hill Trib B 3
Shew Ridge Trib 69
Timber Trib 49
WF Fishing Creek 2167
¹0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 Feet
Figure 5 USGS Topographic Map
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Yadkin River Basin (03040101)
Wilkes County, NC
Project Parcels
Proposed Conservation Easement
Roaring River USGS 7.5 minute topographic quadrangle
S
F

F
i
s
h
i
n
g
C
r
e
e
k
T
im
b
e
r

T
r
i
b
ChickenTr
ib
1Critcher TributaryMagnoliaTribSh
e
w

R
i
d
g
e
Tr
i
b
Critcher Trib AChicken Trib 1aRobin HillTribOak TribIr
o
n
w
o
o
d
T
r
i
b
WF
Fishing Creek
Antioch Trib BAntioch Trib AAntioch TribAnt
i
o
c
h

Trib

B
1Shew Ridge Trib ARobin Hill Trib B
Timber Trib A
AntiochTrib C
Cr
i
tche
rTr
ib
CCritcher Trib DChickenTrib 2Robi
n

H
i
l
l
Trib

A
An
t
i
o
c
h

Tri
b

A
1
110010001200
120011
0
0
1100 100011
0
0
11001100
1
1
0
0
110011001100
1100
1000
1200
¹0 700 1,400 2,100 2,800 Feet
Figure 6 Soils Map
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Yadkin River Basin (03040101)
Wilkes County, NC
2014 Aerial Photography
Project Parcels
Proposed Conservation Easement
Project Streams
Non-project Streams
Soils
CoA - Codorus loam, 0-2% slopes
DaA - Dan River and Comus soils, 0-4% slopes
FaD - Fairview sandy loam, 15-25% slopes
FcC2 - Fairview sandy clay loam, 8-15% slopes
HaA - Hatboro loam, 0-2% slopes
RdE - Rhodhiss fine sandy loam, 25-60% slopes
W - Water
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(SF F
ish
ing
C
re
e
k
Existing barn to remain
Breached earthendam and old pond
Chicken
Tr
ib
1Critcher TributaryCritcher Tri
b

A
Antioch Trib B
Antioch Trib AAntioch TributaryAnt
i
o
c
h

T
r
i
b

B
1Antioch Trib CCr
i
tche
r
T
r
ib
CCritcher Trib DA
n
t
i
o
c
h

T
r
i
b

A
1
Reach 3
Reach 5
Reach 7
Reach 4
Reach 2
Reach 4
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 4
Reach 1
Reach 3
Reach 2
Reach 1 Reach 1
Reach 1
Reach 3
Reach 2
X
S
5 XS21X
S
2
0
XS2XS4
XS19XS24XS14XS
2
2
XS
2
5
X
S
1
1 XS16XS13XS15
XS
6
XS1XS23XS3
XS17XS18X
S
1
2
1100
12001100
1100
1100
1100
1100
¹0 350 700 Feet
Figure 7A Existing Conditions Map - East
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Yadkin River Basin (03040101)
Wilkes County, NC
2014 Aerial Photography
Proposed Conservation Easement
Project Parcels
Row Crops
Cattle Pasture
Existing Wetland
Existing Overhead Electric Line Easement
Perennial Project Streams
Intermittent Project Streams
Non-project Streams
Cross Section
Existing Road
Bedrock
Bank Erosion
Existing Culvert
Incision
!(Headcut
!(Reach Breaks
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(SF Fishing CreekS
F

F
i
s
h
i
n
g

C
r
e
e
k
Ti
m
b
e
r

T
r
i
b
Chicken
T
r
ib
1Magnolia TribSh
e
w

R
i
d
g
e

T
r
i
b
Chicken Trib 1ARobin Hill TribOak TribIr
o
n
w
o
o
d

T
r
i
bWF Fishing CreekRobin Hill
T
r
i
b

BShew Ridge Trib aTimber Trib A
Chicken Trib 2Robi
n

H
i
l
l

T
r
i
b

A
Reach 11
Reach 1
Reach 7
Reach 2
Reach 5
Reach 9
Reach 6
Reach 4
Reach 8
Reach 10
Reach 2
Reach 1Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 1
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 2
Reach 2
Reach 1 XS7XS8XS10
XS27
XS39
X
S
2
9XS30
XS26
XS
2
8
XS48 XS41XS32XS45XS49
XS35
X
S
3
4
X
S
3
7XS36 X
S
9
XS33XS3
8
XS31XS40XS47X
S
4
6 XS50XS43XS44XS42 1000110012001100 1100
1100 11001100¹0 400 800 Feet
Figure 7B Existing Conditions Map - West
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Yadkin River Basin (03040101)
Wilkes County, NC
2014 Aerial Photography
Proposed Conservation Easement
Project Parcels
Row Crops
Cattle Pasture
Existing Wetland
Existing Overhead Electric Line Easement
Perennial Project Streams
Intermittent Project Streams
Non-project Streams
Cross Section
Existing Road
Bedrock
Bank Erosion
Existing Culvert
Incision
!(Headcut
!(Reach Breaks
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
Reach 4
Reach 5Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 2
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 1
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 6
Reach 7
Reach 8
Reach 9
Reach 10
Reach 11
Reach 1
Reach 2
SF

F
i
s
h
i
n
g

C
r
e
e
k
T
im
b
e
r

T
r
i
b
WF Fishing CreekChicken
Tr
ib
1Magnolia TribRobin Hill TribSh
e
w

R
i
d
g
e

T
i
b
Oak TribI
ronwood
T
r
ib
Chicken Trib 1
AShew Ridge Trib ABoun
d
a
r
y

T
r
i
b
Robin Hill Trib B
Timber Trib A
Chicken Trib 2Rob
i
n

H
i
l
l

T
r
i
b

A
¹0 400 800 Feet
Figure 8 FEMA Floodplain Map
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Yadkin River Basin (03040101)
Wilkes County, NC
Proposed Conservation Easement
Project Parcels
Project Streams
!(Reach Breaks
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(SF F
ish
ing
C
re
ek
Chicken
Tr
ib
1Critcher TributaryCritcher Tri
b

A
Antioch Trib B
Antioch Trib AAntioch TributaryAnt
i
o
c
h

T
r
i
b

B
1Antioch Trib CCr
i
tche
r
T
r
ib
CCritcher Trib DA
n
t
i
o
c
h

T
r
i
b

A
1
Reach 2
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 2Reach 1
Reach 1Reach 3 Reach 2
Reach 5
Reach 1
Reach 3
Reach 2
Reach 1
Reach 4
Reach 4
Reach 4
Reach 3
¬«7
¬«1
¬«4
¬«3
¬«6
¬«5
¬«2
1100
1100
1100
1100
1100
¹0 350 700 Feet
Figure 9A Concept Design Map - East
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Yadkin River Basin (03040101)
Wilkes County, NC
2014 Aerial Photography
Project Parcels
Proposed Conservation Easement
Proposed Internal Crossing
Potential Wetland Waters
Existing Overhead Electric Line Easement
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancement I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Proposed BMPs
Existing Road
Non-project Streams
!(Reach Breaks
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(SF Fishing CreekExisting Roadto be Abandoned
Existing Roadto be Improved
S
F

F
i
s
h
i
n
g

C
r
e
e
k
Ti
m
b
e
r

T
r
i
b
Chicken
T
r
ib
1Magnolia TribSh
e
w

R
i
d
g
e

T
r
i
b
Chicken Trib 1ARobin Hill TribOak TribIr
o
nw
o
o
d

T
r
i
bWF Fishing CreekRobin Hill
T
r
i
b

BShew Ridge Trib aTimber Trib A
Robi
n

H
i
l
l

T
r
i
b

A
Reach 11
Reach 1
Reach 7
Reach 4
Reach 6
Reach 9
Reach 8
Reach 5
Reach 3
Reach 10
Reach 2
Reach 2
Reach 2
Reach 1
Reach 1
Reach 1
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 2
¬«7
¬«3
¬«10
¬«8
¬«9
¬«21000110012001100 1100
10001100 11001100¹0 400 800 Feet
Figure 9B Concept Design Map - West
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Yadkin River Basin (03040101)
Wilkes County, NC
2014 Aerial Photography
Project Parcels
Proposed Conservation Easement
Proposed Internal Crossing
Potential Wetland Waters
Existing Overhead Electric Line Easement
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancement I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Proposed BMPs
Existing Road
Non-project Streams
!(Reach Breaks
!A
!A
!A
!A
!A
!A
!A
!A
!A
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(SF F
ish
ing
C
re
ek
Chicken
Tr
ib
1Critcher TributaryCritcher Tri
b

A
Antioch Trib B
Antioch Trib AAntioch TributaryAnt
i
o
c
h

T
r
i
b

B
1Antioch Trib CCr
i
tche
r
T
r
ib
CCritcher Trib DA
n
t
i
o
c
h

T
r
i
b

A
1
Reach 2
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 2Reach 1
Reach 1Reach 3 Reach 2
Reach 5
Reach 1
Reach 3
Reach 2
Reach 1
Reach 4
Reach 4
Reach 4
Reach 3
1100
1100
1100
1100
1100
¹0 350 700 Feet
Figure 10A Monitoring Plan Map - East
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Yadkin River Basin (03040101)
Wilkes County, NC
2014 Aerial Photography
Proposed Conservation Easement
Proposed Internal Crossing
Potential Wetland Waters
Proposed Vegetation Plot
Proposed Open Planting Area
Proposed Shaded Planting Area
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancement I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Proposed BMPs
Existing Overhead Electric Line Easement
Existing Road
Non-project Streams
Proposed Cross Section
!(Reach Breaks
!A Proposed Crest Gage/Stream Gage
!A
!A
!A
!A
!A
!A
!A
!A
!A
!A
!A
!A
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(SF Fishing CreekExisting Roadto be Abandoned
Existing Roadto be Improved
S
F

F
i
s
h
i
n
g

C
r
e
e
k
Ti
m
b
e
r

T
r
i
b
Chicken
T
r
ib
1Magnolia TribSh
e
w

R
i
d
g
e

T
r
i
b
Chicken Trib 1ARobin Hill TribOak TribIr
o
nw
o
o
d

T
r
i
bWF Fishing CreekRobin Hill
T
r
i
b

BShew Ridge Trib aTimber Trib A
Chicken Trib 2Robi
n

H
i
l
l

T
r
i
b

A
Reach 11
Reach 1
Reach 7
Reach 4
Reach 6
Reach 9
Reach 8
Reach 5
Reach 3
Reach 10
Reach 2
Reach 2
Reach 2
Reach 1
Reach 1
Reach 1
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 2 1000110012001100 1100
10001100 11001100¹0 400 800 Feet
Figure 10B Monitoring Plan Map - West
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Yadkin River Basin (03040101)
Wilkes County, NC
2014 Aerial Photography
Proposed Conservation Easement
Proposed Internal Crossing
Potential Wetland Waters
Proposed Vegetation Plot
Proposed Open Planting Area
Proposed Shaded Planting Area
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancement I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Proposed BMPs
Non-project Streams
Existing Overhead Electric Line Easement
Existing Road
Proposed Cross Section
!A Proposed Crest Gage/Stream Gage
!(Reach Breaks

APPENDIX 1
Site Protection Instrument

SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE 

PERMANENT CONSERVATION EASEMENT 

THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT (“Conservation Easement”) made this 
   day of                                  , 2019 by and between ,  
(“Grantor”) and Unique Places to Save (“Grantee”). 

The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, 
their heirs, successors and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine 
or neuter as required by context. 

RECITALS 

WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying and 
being in Wilkes County, North Carolina, more particularly described in Exhibit A attached 
hereto and incorporated herein (the “Property”); 

WHEREAS, Grantee is a charitable, not‐for‐profit or educational corporation, 
association, or trust qualified under § 501 (c)(3) and § 170 (h) of the Internal Revenue 
Code, the purposes or powers of which include one or more of the purposes (a) – (d) 
RECORDING REQUESTED BY 
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: 

Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104 
Charlotte, NC 28203 
Prepared by Wildlands Engineering, Inc 
listed below; 

(a) retaining or protecting natural, scenic, or open‐space aspects of real 
property; 
(b) ensuring the availability of real property for recreational, educational,  or 
open‐space use; 
(c) protecting natural resources; 
(d) maintaining or enhancing air or water quality. 

WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee recognize the conservation, scenic, natural, or 
aesthetic value of the property in its natural state, which includes the following natural 
communities: wetlands, streams and riparian  buffers. The purpose of this Conservation 
Easement is to maintain streams, wetlands  and riparian resources and other natural 
values of approximately  _____ acres, more or less, and being more particularly described 
in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated fully herein by reference (the 
“Conservation Easement Area”), and  prevent the use or development of the Conservation 
Easement Area for any purpose or in any manner that would conflict with the 
maintenance of its natural condition. 

WHEREAS, the restoration, enhancement and preservation of the Conservation 
Easement Area is a condition of the approval of the Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI) 
and Mitigation Plan for the Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank – Critcher Brothers 
Mitigation Site, Department of the Army (DA) Action ID Number SAW 2017‐01913, 
entitled “Agreement to Establish the Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank in the 
Yadkin River Basin within the State of North Carolina”, entered into by and between 
Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC (Wildlands) acting as the Bank Sponsor and the Wilmington 
District Corps of Engineers (Corps), in consultation with the North Carolina Interagency 
Review Team (IRT). The Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site has been approved by the 
Corps for use as a mitigation bank to compensate for unavoidable stream and wetland 
impacts authorized by DA permits. 

WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee agree that third‐party rights of enforcement  shall 
be held by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (“Third‐Party,” to 
include any successor agencies), and may be exercised through the appropriate 
enforcement agencies of the United States, and that these rights are in addition to, and 
do not limit, the rights of enforcement under the Department of the Army instrument 
number SAW‐2017‐01913 (“Mitigation Banking Instrument”), or any permit or 
certification issued by the Third‐Party. 

NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the covenants and  representations 
contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and legal 
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor hereby  unconditionally and 
irrevocably grants and conveys unto Grantee, its heirs, successors and assigns, forever 
and in perpetuity a Conservation Easement of the nature and  character and to the extent 
hereinafter set forth, over the Conservation Easement Area  described on Exhibit B, 
together with the right to preserve and protect the conservation  values thereof, as 
follows: 
ARTICLE I. 
DURATIONOF EASEMENT 

This Conservation Easement shall be perpetual. This Conservation Easement is  an 
easement in gross, runs with the land and is enforceable by Grantee against Grantor, 
Grantor’s personal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, lessees, agents and 
licensees. 

ARTICLE II. 
PROHIBITED AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES 

Any activity on, or use of, the Conservation Easement Area inconsistent with  the 
purpose of this Conservation Easement is prohibited. The Conservation  Easement Area 
shall be preserved in its natural condition and restricted from any development that 
would impair or interfere with the conservation values of the Conservation Easement 
Area. 

Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following activities and  uses 
are expressly prohibited, restricted or reserved as indicated hereunder: 

A. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change disturbance, alteration or 
impairment of the natural features of the Conservation Easement Area or any 
introduction of non‐native plants and/or animal species is prohibited. 

B. Construction. There shall be no constructing or placing of any building, mobile 
home, asphalt or concrete pavement, billboard or other advertising display, antenna, 
utility pole, tower, conduit, line, pier, landing, dock or any other temporary or permanent 
structure or facility on or above the Conservation  Easement Area. 

C. Industrial, Commercial and Residential Use. Industrial, residential and/or 
commercial activities, including any rights of passage for such purposes are prohibited. 

D. Agricultural, Grazing and Horticultural Use. Agricultural, grazing, animal 
husbandry, and horticultural use of the Conservation Easement Area are prohibited. 

E. Vegetation. There shall be no removal, burning, destruction, harming, cutting 
or mowing of trees, shrubs, or other vegetation in the Conservation Easement Area except 
as provided in the Mitigation Plan. Mowing of invasive and herbaceous  vegetation for 
purposes of enhancing planted or volunteer trees and shrubs approved  in the Mitigation 
Plan is allowable once a year for no more than five consecutive years from the date on 
page 1 of this Conservation Easement, except where mowing will negatively impact 
vegetation or disturb soils. Mowing activities shall only be performed  by Wildlands 
Holdings IV, LLC and shall not violate any part of Item L of Article II. 

F. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, trails or walkways 
on the Conservation Easement Area; nor enlargement or modification to existing roads, 
trails or walkways. 

G. Signage. No signs shall be permitted on or over the Conservation Easement 
Area, except the posting of no trespassing signs, signs identifying the conservation  values 
of the Conservation Easement Area, signs giving directions or proscribing rules  and 
regulations for the use of the Conservation Easement Area and/or signs identifying  the 
Grantor as owner of the Conservation Easement Area. 

H. Dumping or Storage. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste, 
abandoned vehicles, appliances, machinery or hazardous substances, or toxic or 
hazardous waste, or any placement of underground or aboveground storage tanks or 
other materials on the Conservation Easement Area is prohibited. 

I. Excavation, Dredging or Mineral Use. There shall be no grading, filling, 
excavation, dredging, mining or drilling; no removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock, peat, 
minerals or other materials, and no change in the topography of the land in any  manner 
on the Conservation Easement Area, except to restore natural topography or drainage 
patterns.  For purposes of restoring and enhancing streams and wetlands  within the 
Conservation Easement Area, Wildlands is allowed to perform grading, filling, and 
excavation associated with stream and wetland restoration and  enhancement activities as 
described in the Mitigation Plan and authorized by  Department of the Army Nationwide 
Permit 27. 

J. Water Quality and Drainage Pattern. There shall be no diking, draining, 
dredging, channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or related activities, or 
altering or tampering with water control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration 
of the restored, enhanced, or created drainage patterns. In addition, diverting or causing 
or permitting the diversion of surface or underground water into, within or out of the 
easement area by any means, removal of wetlands, polluting or discharging into waters, 
springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides is  prohibited. 

K. Development Rights. No development rights that have been encumbered or 
extinguished by this Conservation Easement shall be transferred pursuant to a 
transferable development rights scheme or cluster development arrangement or 
otherwise. 

L. Vehicles. The operation of mechanized vehicles, including, but not limited to, 
motorcycles, dirt bikes, all‐terrain vehicles, cars and trucks is prohibited other than for  
temporary or occasional access by the Wildlands, the Grantee, its employees and 
agents, successors, assigns, and the Corps for purposes of  constructing, maintaining 
and monitoring the restoration, enhancement and  preservation of streams, wetlands 
and riparian areas within the Conservation  Easement Area. 

M. Other Prohibitions. Any other use of, or activity on, the Conservation 
Easement Area which is or may become inconsistent with the purposes of this grant, the 
preservation of the Conservation Easement Area substantially in its natural condition, or 
the protection of its environmental systems, is prohibited. 

ARTICLE III 
GRANTOR’S RESEVERED RIGHTS 

The Grantor expressly reserves for himself, his personal representatives, heirs, 
successors or assigns, the right to continue the use of the Conservation Easement Area  for 
all purposes not inconsistent with this Conservation Easement, including, but not limited 
to, the right to quiet enjoyment of the Conservation Easement Area, the rights  of ingress 
and egress, the right to hunt, fish, and hike on the Conservation Easement Area, the right 
to sell, transfer, gift or otherwise convey the Conservation Easement Area, in whole or in 
part, provided such sale, transfer or gift conveyance is subject to  the terms of, and shall 
specifically reference, this Conservation Easement. 

Notwithstanding the foregoing Restrictions, Grantor reserves for Grantor, its 
successors and assigns, including Wildlands acting as the Bank Sponsor, the right to 
construct and perform activities related to the restoration, enhancement, and 
preservation of streams, wetlands and riparian areas within the Conservation  Easement 
Area in accordance with the approved Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Plan‐Critcher 
Brothers Mitigation Site, and the Mitigation Banking Instrument described in the Recitals 
of this Conservation  Easement. 

Notwithstanding the foregoing Restrictions, Grantor reserves for Grantor, its 
successors and assigns, the following rights in the areas labeled as “Reserved Stream 
Crossing” in the approved Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank – Critcher Brothers 
Site Mitigation Plan, Department of the Army (DA) Action ID Number SAW‐2017‐
01913:  

Reserved Stream Crossing: vehicular access and livestock access is allowed.  
Crossings that allow livestock access will be bounded by fencing and will be over 
a culvert.   

ARTICLE IV. 
GRANTEE’S RIGHTS 

The Grantee or its authorized representatives, successors and assigns, and the 
Corps, shall have the right to enter the Property and Conservation Easement Area at all 
reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting the Conservation Easement Area to 
determine if the Grantor, or his personal representatives, heirs, successors, or assigns, is 
complying with the terms, conditions, restrictions, and purposes of this Conservation 
Easement.  The Grantee, Wildlands, and its authorized representatives, successors and 
assigns, and the Corps shall also have the right to enter and go upon the Conservation 
Easement Area for purposes of making scientific or educational observations and studies, 
and taking samples. The easement rights granted herein do  not include public access 
rights. 

ARTICLE V 
ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES 

A. To accomplish the purposes of this Easement, Grantee, and the Corps are 
allowed to prevent any activity on or use of the Conservation Easement Area that is 
inconsistent with the purposes of this Easement and to require the restoration of such 
areas or features of the Conservation Easement Area that may be damaged by such 
activity or use. Upon any breach of the terms of this Conservation Easement by Grantor 
that comes to the attention of the Grantee, the Grantee shall notify the Grantor in writing 
of such breach. The Grantor shall have 30 days after receipt of such notice to correct the 
conditions constituting such breach. If the breach remains  uncured after 30 days, the 
Grantee may enforce this Conservation Easement by appropriate legal proceedings 
including damages, injunctive and other relief.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, the 
Grantee reserves the immediate right, without  notice, to obtain a temporary restraining 
order, injunctive or other appropriate relief if  the breach of the terms of this Conservation 
Easement is or would irreversibly or otherwise materially impair the benefits to be derived 
from this Conservation  Easement. The Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that under such 
circumstances  damage to the Grantee would be irreparable and remedies at law will be 
inadequate.  The rights and remedies of the Grantee provided hereunder shall be in 
addition to,  and not in lieu of, all other rights and remedies available to Grantee in 
connection   with this Conservation Easement. The costs of a breach, correction or 
restoration, including the Grantee’s expenses, court costs, and attorneys’ fees, shall be 
paid by  Grantor, provided Grantor is determined to be responsible for the breach. The 
Corps  shall have the same rights and privileges as the said Grantee to enforce the terms 
and  conditions of this Conservation easement. 

B. No failure on the part of the Grantee to enforce any covenant or provision 
hereof shall discharge or invalidate such covenant or any other covenant, condition, or 
provision hereof or affect the right to Grantee to enforce the same in the event of  a 
subsequent breach or default. 

C. Nothing contained in this Conservation Easement shall be construed to 
entitle Grantee to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or change in the 
Conservation Easement Area resulting from causes beyond the Grantor’s control, 
including, without limitation, fire, flood, storm, war, acts of God or third parties, except 
Grantor’s lessees or invitees; or from any prudent action taken in good faith by Grantor 
under emergency conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate significant injury to life, 
damage to property or harm to the Conservation Easement Area resulting from such 
causes. 
ARTICLE VI 
MISCELLANEOUS 

A. Warranty. Grantor warrants, covenants and represents that it owns the 
Property in fee simple, and that Grantor either owns all interests in the Property which 
may be impaired by the granting of this Conservation Easement or that there are no 
outstanding mortgages, tax liens, encumbrances, or other interests in the Property which 
have not been expressly subordinated to this Conservation Easement. Grantor further 
warrants that Grantee shall have the use of and enjoy all the benefits derived  from and 
arising out of this Conservation Easement, and that Grantor will warrant and  defend title 
to the Property against the claims of all persons. 

B. Subsequent Transfers. The Grantor agrees to incorporate the terms of this 
Conservation Easement in any deed or other legal instrument that transfers any  interest 
in all or a portion of the Conservation Easement Area. The Grantor agrees to  provide 
written notice of such transfer at least sixty (60) days prior to the date of the transfer. The 
Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this Conservation Easement shall survive any 
merger of the fee and easement interests in the Conservation Easement Area or any 
portion thereof and shall not be amended, modified or terminated without the prior 
written consent and approval of the Corps. 

C. Assignment. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this 
Conservation Easement are in gross and assignable provided, however that the Grantee 
hereby covenants and agrees, that in the event it transfers or assigns this  Conservation 
Easement, the organization receiving the interest will be a qualified  holder pursuant to 33 
CFR 332.7 (a)(1), N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121‐34 et seq. and § 501 (c)(3) and § 170 (h) of the 
Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee further covenants and  agrees that the terms of 
the transfer or assignment will be such that the transferee or assignee will be required to 
continue in perpetuity the conservation purposes  described in this document. 

D. Entire Agreement and Severability. The Mitigation Banking Instrument:  MBI 
with corresponding Mitigation Plan, and this Conservation Easement sets forth the entire 
agreement of the parties with respect to the Conservation Easement and  supersedes all 
prior discussions, negotiations, understandings or agreements relating to  the 
Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be void or unenforceable by a  court of 
competent jurisdiction, the remainder shall continue in full force and effect. 

E. Obligations of Ownership. Grantor is responsible for any real estate taxes, 
assessments, fees, or charges levied upon the Property. Grantor shall keep the Property 
free of any liens or other encumbrances for obligations incurred by Grantor, except those 
incurred after the date hereof, which are expressly subject and subordinate to the 
Conservation Easement. Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs or liability of any 
kind related to the ownership, operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of the 
Property, except as expressly provided herein. Nothing herein shall relieve the Grantor of 
the obligation to comply with federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits that may 
apply to the exercise of the Reserved Rights. 

F. Long‐Term Management.  If livestock operations will be maintained on the 
property, Grantor is responsible for all long‐term management activities associated  with 
fencing to ensure livestock do not have access to the Protected Property.  These activities 
include the maintenance and/or replacement of fence structures, as deemed necessary by 
the Grantee, to ensure the aquatic resource functions within the boundaries of the 
Protected Property are sustained. 

G. Extinguishment. In the event that changed conditions render impossible the 
continued use of the Conservation Easement Area for the conservation purposes, this 
Conservation Easement may only be extinguished, in whole or in part, by judicial 
proceeding. 

H. Eminent Domain. Whenever all or part of the Conservation Easement Area 
is taken in the exercise of eminent domain so as to substantially abrogate the 
Restrictions imposed by this Conservation Easement, Grantor and Grantee shall join in 
appropriate actions at the time of such taking to recover the full value of the taking, 
and all incidental and direct damages due to the taking. 

I. Proceeds. This Conservation Easement constitutes a real property interest 
immediately vested in Grantee. In the event that all or a portion of the Conservation 
Easement Area is sold, exchanged, or involuntarily converted following an  extinguishment 
or the exercise of eminent domain, Grantee shall be entitled to the fair market value of 
this Conservation Easement as determined at the time of the extinguishment or 
condemnation. 

J. Notification. Any notice, request for approval, or other communication  required 
under this Conservation Easement shall be sent by registered or certified mail,  postage 
prepaid, to the following addresses (or such address as may be hereafter specified by 
notice pursuant to this paragraph): 

To Grantor: 
[Name, address and fax number] 

To Grantee: 
Unique Places to Save 
PO Box 1183 
Chapel Hill, NC 27514‐1183 
Attention: David Harper 

To Sponsor: 
Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC 
143 South Mint Street, Suite 104 
Charlotte, NC 28203 
Attention:  Shawn D. Wilkerson 
Fax: 704‐332‐3306 

To the Corps: 
US Army Corps of Engineers 
Wilmington District Regulatory Division 
69 Darlington Avenue 
Wilmington, NC 28403 

K. Failure of Grantee. If at any time Grantee is unable or fails to enforce this 
Conservation Easement, or if Grantee ceases to be a qualified grantee, and if within a 
reasonable period of time after the occurrence of one of these events Grantee fails to 
make an assignment pursuant to this Conservation Easement, then the Grantee’s  interest 
shall become vested in another qualified grantee in accordance with an  appropriate 
proceeding in a court of competent jurisdiction. 

L. Amendment. This Conservation Easement may be amended, but only in  a 
writing signed by all parties hereto, and provided such amendment does not affect the 
qualification of this Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee under any 
applicable laws, and is consistent with the conservation purposes of this  grant. 

M. Present Condition of the Conservation Easement Area. The wetlands, scenic, 
resource, environmental, and other natural characteristics of the Conservation 
Easement Area, and its current use and state of improvement, are described in Section 
3 of the Mitigation Plan, prepared by Grantor and acknowledged by the Grantor and 
Grantee to be complete and accurate as of the date hereof. Both Grantor and  Grantee 
have copies of this report. It will be used by the parties to assure that any  future changes 
in the use of the Conservation Easement Area will be consistent with  the terms of this 
Conservation Easement. However, this report is not intended to preclude the use of other 
evidence to establish the present condition of the Conservation Easement Area if there is a 
controversy over its use. 

TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto Grantee for the 
aforesaid purposes. 

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day and 
year first above written. 

By:  ________________________________   

Date:________________________________   

NORTH CAROLINA  
COUNTY OF _________________ 

I, _____________________________, a Notary Public in and for the County and State 
aforesaid,  do  hereby  certify  that  _________________________,  Grantor,  personally 
appeared  before  me  this  day  and  acknowledged  the  execution  of  the  foregoing 
instrument.    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Notary Seal this the __________ 
day of ___________________, 20__. 

________________________________________ 
Notary Public 

My commission expires: 

______________________________ 

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantee has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day 
and year first above written. 

Unique Places to Save 

By: ___________________________________ (SEAL) 
David Harper, Director 

NORTH CAROLINA  
COUNTY OF _________________ 

I, _____________________________, a Notary Public in and for the County and State 
aforesaid, do hereby certify that David Harper, Grantor, personally appeared before me 
this day and acknowledged that he is Director of Unique Places to Save, a non‐profit 
corporation, and that he, as Director, being authorized to do so, executed the foregoing 
on behalf of the corporation.    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Notary Seal this the __________ 
day of ___________________, 20__. 

________________________________________ 
Notary Public 

My commission expires: 

______________________________ 

EXHIBIT A 

[Property Description ‐ Map] 

EXHIBIT B 

[Easement Legal Description] 

APPENDIX 2
DWR Stream Identification Forms
NC SAM Forms
... -I .,,,.
NC OW Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: I I -9 -{ 1-Project/Site: C..r :4..,k.,,..
Evaluator: :Cf/('\ (
Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent if?!. 19 or erennial if?!. 30•
A.Geomorpholoqy (Subtotal =
1•· Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
2=1
3.In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,rioole-pool sequence
4.Particle size of stream substrate
)
5.Active/relict floodplain t �\:(.,.-\ I; ...,c.,,�, \ 6. Depositional bars or benches
7.Recent alluvial deposits
8.Headcuts
9.Grade control
10.Natural valley
11 . Second or greater order channel
• artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B.Hvdroloqy (Subtotal =s )
12.Presence of Baseflow
13.Iron oxidizing bacteria
14.Leaf litter
15.Sediment on plants or debris
16.Organic debris lines or piles
17.Soil-based evidence of high water table?
C.BioloQy (Subtotal = q ) 18.Fibrous roots in streambed
19.Rooted upland plants in streambed
20.Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
21.Aquatic Mollusks
22.Fish
23.Crayfish
24. Amphibians
County: \JJ, Ike.>
Absent
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
( oJ
0
0
No = 0
0
(t)") 1.5
0
0
No = 0
(3.J \3) 0 r D""i (()7
( 0 ) 0
0
Weak
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
(0.5\ en;--
1
1
(_1) (0.5; �
2
2
1
1
0.5
0.5 ( 1).5) (<r.5)
Latitude:
Longitude:-B\ ,03 \ 3Ct,
Other SF-i::,sk,,..) C.tc::dc
e.g. Quad Name: V f' �r f: ,l
bJ r4 I lw P'°f' -, ''(
Moderate Strong
2 (3)
(-0) 3
2 OJ 2 (3) 2 {'3) 2 fY ('L\ 3 '9 3
1 1.5
1 (1.51/Yes = 3\ -
'---J
2 (3) 2 ·-·3-
0.5 0
1 1.5
(1)� ...... 1.5 T Yes = 3 '
......__
1 0
1 0
(2, 3
'2 3
1 1.5
1 1.5
1 1.5
1 -1.525.Algae
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 70ther = 0 j 'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: �
\1 ·,
\
\
�\),""��t\,,)
,'< t• \\,.[\;-,,.:
S � l f'. ll.s. l
\\ . �\ c.. ". "\ , I
\ \ i.,1 J l \\
S."-.:.,,.UV\.,._t,.
--.......
SCP 1
SCP 2
SCP 3
SCP 4
SCP 5
SCP 6
SCP 7
SCP 8
SCP 9
SCP 10
SCP 11
SCP 12
SCP 13
SCP 14
SCP 15
SCP 16
SCP 17
SCP 18
SCP 19
SCP 20
SCP 21
SCP 22
SCP 23
SCP 24
SCP 25
SCP 26
SCP 27
SCP 28
SCP 29
SCP 30
SCP 31
SCP 32
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
(1) Habitat
(2) In-stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In-stream Habitat
(2) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
Overall
NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
MEDIUM
LOW
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
NA
NA
(2) Flood Flow
M. Caddell
2/28/2018
NO
NO
NO
Perennial
(2) Baseflow
Stream Category Assessor Name/Organization
LOW
Pb1
Stream Site Name Critcher Bros - Antioch Trib A Reach 2 Date of Evaluation
LOW
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
MEDIUM
NA
MEDIUM
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
Function Class Rating Summary
(1) Hydrology
NA
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
NA
YES
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
LOW
NA
LOW
LOW
LOW
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
(1) Habitat
(2) In-stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In-stream Habitat
(2) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
Overall LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
LOW
HIGH
MEDIUM
NA
NA
MEDIUM
NA
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
HIGH
MEDIUM
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
Function Class Rating Summary
(1) Hydrology
NA
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
HIGH
NA
YES
LOW
Stream Site Name Critcher Bros - Antioch Trib B Reach 2 Date of Evaluation
LOW
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
HIGH
HIGH
NA
NA
MEDIUM
NA
MEDIUM
NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
HIGH
MEDIUM
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
NA
NA
(2) Flood Flow
M. Caddell
2/28/2018
NO
NO
NO
Perennial
(2) Baseflow
Stream Category Assessor Name/Organization
LOW
Pb1
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
(1) Habitat
(2) In-stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In-stream Habitat
(2) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
Overall LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
NA
NA
MEDIUM
NA
LOW
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
Function Class Rating Summary
(1) Hydrology
NA
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
YES
LOW
Stream Site Name Critcher Bros - Antioch Trib Reach 3 Date of Evaluation
LOW
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
LOW
NA
MEDIUM
NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
LOW
LOW
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
NA
NA
(2) Flood Flow
M. Caddell
2/28/2018
NO
NO
NO
Perennial
(2) Baseflow
Stream Category Assessor Name/Organization
LOW
Pb1
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
(1) Habitat
(2) In-stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In-stream Habitat
(2) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
Overall LOW
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
NA
NA
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
MEDIUM
HIGH
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
Function Class Rating Summary
(1) Hydrology
NA
LOW
HIGH
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
YES
LOW
Stream Site Name Critcher Bros - Chicken Trib 1 Reach 2 Date of Evaluation
LOW
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
NA
HIGH
NA
HIGH
NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
NA
NA
(2) Flood Flow
M. Caddell
2/23/2018
NO
NO
NO
Perennial
(2) Baseflow
Stream Category Assessor Name/Organization
LOW
Pa3
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
(1) Habitat
(2) In-stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In-stream Habitat
(2) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
Overall LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
NA
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW
YES
NA
NA
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
NA
NA
LOW
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
Function Class Rating Summary
(1) Hydrology
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
NA
YES
NA
NA
LOW
Stream Site Name
LOW
NA
Critcher Bros - Chicken Trib 2 Date of Evaluation
LOW
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
NA
OMITTED
NA
MEDIUM
NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
LOW
LOW
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
NA
NA
(2) Flood Flow
M. Caddell
2/28/2018
NO
NO
NO
Intermittent
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
(2) Baseflow
Stream Category Assessor Name/Organization
LOW
Pa1
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
(1) Habitat
(2) In-stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In-stream Habitat
(2) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
Overall LOW
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
NA
NA
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW
MEDIUM
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
Function Class Rating Summary
(1) Hydrology
NA
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
NA
YES
LOW
Stream Site Name Critcher Bros - Critcher Trib A Lower Date of Evaluation
LOW
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
NA
MEDIUM
NA
MEDIUM
NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
NA
NA
(2) Flood Flow
M. Caddell
2/28/2018
NO
NO
NO
Perennial
(2) Baseflow
Stream Category Assessor Name/Organization
LOW
Pa1
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
(1) Habitat
(2) In-stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In-stream Habitat
(2) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
Overall LOW
LOW
LOW
HIGH
LOW
HIGH
LOW
NA
NA
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW
MEDIUM
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
Function Class Rating Summary
(1) Hydrology
NA
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
YES
LOW
Stream Site Name Critcher Bros - Critcher Trib A Upper Date of Evaluation
LOW
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
MEDIUM
HIGH
NA
NA
MEDIUM
NA
MEDIUM
NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
HIGH
MEDIUM
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
NA
NA
(2) Flood Flow
M. Caddell
2/28/2018
NO
NO
NO
Perennial
(2) Baseflow
Stream Category Assessor Name/Organization
LOW
Pa1
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
(1) Habitat
(2) In-stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In-stream Habitat
(2) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
Overall LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
NA
NA
LOW
NA
LOW
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW
MEDIUM
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
Function Class Rating Summary
(1) Hydrology
NA
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
YES
LOW
Stream Site Name Critcher Bros - Critcher Trib C Date of Evaluation
LOW
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
LOW
NA
MEDIUM
NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
LOW
MEDIUM
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
NA
NA
(2) Flood Flow
M. Caddell
2/28/2018
NO
NO
NO
Perennial
(2) Baseflow
Stream Category Assessor Name/Organization
LOW
Pb1
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
(1) Habitat
(2) In-stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In-stream Habitat
(2) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
Overall LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
NA
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW
YES
NA
NA
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
NA
NA
LOW
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
Function Class Rating Summary
(1) Hydrology
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
NA
YES
NA
NA
LOW
Stream Site Name
LOW
NA
Critcher Bros - Critcher Trib D Date of Evaluation
LOW
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
NA
HIGH
NA
MEDIUM
NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
LOW
LOW
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
NA
NA
(2) Flood Flow
M. Caddell
2/28/2018
NO
NO
NO
Intermittent
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
(2) Baseflow
Stream Category Assessor Name/Organization
LOW
Pa1
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
(1) Habitat
(2) In-stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In-stream Habitat
(2) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
Overall LOW
LOW
LOW
HIGH
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
NA
NA
LOW
NA
LOW
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW
MEDIUM
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
Function Class Rating Summary
(1) Hydrology
NA
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
NA
YES
LOW
Stream Site Name Critcher Bros - Critcher Trib Reach 3 Date of Evaluation
LOW
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
NA
MEDIUM
NA
MEDIUM
NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
HIGH
LOW
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
NA
NA
(2) Flood Flow
M. Caddell
2/28/2018
NO
NO
NO
Perennial
(2) Baseflow
Stream Category Assessor Name/Organization
LOW
Pb1
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
(1) Habitat
(2) In-stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In-stream Habitat
(2) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
Overall
NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
MEDIUM
LOW
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
NA
NA
(2) Flood Flow
M. Caddell
2/28/2018
NO
NO
NO
Perennial
(2) Baseflow
Stream Category Assessor Name/Organization
LOW
Pa2
Stream Site Name Critcher Bros - Critcher Trib Reach 4 Date of Evaluation
LOW
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
NA
MEDIUM
NA
HIGH
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
Function Class Rating Summary
(1) Hydrology
NA
LOW
HIGH
LOW
LOW
NA
YES
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW
HIGH
LOW
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
NA
NA
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
(1) Habitat
(2) In-stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In-stream Habitat
(2) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
Overall LOW
LOW
HIGH
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NA
NA
HIGH
HIGH
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
NA
NA
NA
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
Function Class Rating Summary
(1) Hydrology
NA
MEDIUM
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
NA
YES
LOW
Stream Site Name Critcher Brothers- Ironwood Reach 1 Date of Evaluation
LOW
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
MEDIUM
NA
HIGH
NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
LOW
MEDIUM
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
NA
NA
(2) Flood Flow
C. Lanza
02/23/2018
NO
NO
NO
Perennial
(2) Baseflow
Stream Category Assessor Name/Organization
LOW
Pa1
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
(1) Habitat
(2) In-stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In-stream Habitat
(2) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
Overall
NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
LOW
MEDIUM
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
NA
NA
(2) Flood Flow
C. Lanza
02/23/2018
YES
NO
Perennial
(2) Baseflow
Stream Category Assessor Name/Organization
MEDIUM
Pa2
Stream Site Name Critcher Brothers - Magnolia Reach 2 Date of Evaluation
LOW
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
NA
NA
HIGH
NA
HIGH
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
Function Class Rating Summary
(1) Hydrology
NA
MEDIUM
HIGH
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
YES
MEDIUM
NA
NA
NA
NA
MEDIUM
HIGH
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
HIGH
MEDIUM
NA
NA
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
(1) Habitat
(2) In-stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In-stream Habitat
(2) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
Overall
NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
HIGH
MEDIUM
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
NA
NA
(2) Flood Flow
M. Caddell
02/23/2018
NO
NO
NO
Perennial
(2) Baseflow
Stream Category Assessor Name/Organization
LOW
Pb1
Stream Site Name Critcher Brothers- Oak Trib Date of Evaluation
LOW
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
HIGH
MEDIUM
NA
NA
MEDIUM
NA
HIGH
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
Function Class Rating Summary
(1) Hydrology
NA
MEDIUM
HIGH
MEDIUM
HIGH
NA
NO
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
HIGH
HIGH
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NA
NA
HIGH
NA
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
(1) Habitat
(2) In-stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In-stream Habitat
(2) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
Overall
NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
LOW
LOW
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
NA
NA
(2) Flood Flow
M. Caddell
02/23/2018
NO
NO
NO
Perennial
(2) Baseflow
Stream Category Assessor Name/Organization
LOW
Pa1
Stream Site Name Critcher Brothers- Robin Hill Lower Date of Evaluation
LOW
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
MEDIUM
NA
MEDIUM
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
Function Class Rating Summary
(1) Hydrology
NA
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
NA
YES
MEDIUM
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
(1) Habitat
(2) In-stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In-stream Habitat
(2) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
Overall LOW
LOW
HIGH
LOW
LOW
LOW
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
LOW
HIGH
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
MEDIUM
HIGH
NA
NA
HIGH
NA
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
NA
NA
NA
HIGH
YES
NA
NA
HIGH
HIGH
NA
NA
NA
LOW
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
Function Class Rating Summary
(1) Hydrology
MEDIUM
HIGH
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW
HIGH
MEDIUM
LOW
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
NA
YES
NA
NA
LOW
Stream Site Name
MEDIUM
NA
Critcher Brothers- Robin Hill Trib A Date of Evaluation
LOW
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
HIGH
MEDIUM
HIGH
HIGH
LOW
HIGH
NA
NA
LOW
NA
HIGH
NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
NA
NA
(2) Flood Flow
M. Caldell
2/23/2018
NO
NO
NO
Intermittent
NA
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow
Stream Category Assessor Name/Organization
LOW
Pb1
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
(1) Habitat
(2) In-stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In-stream Habitat
(2) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
Overall
NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
LOW
MEDIUM
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
NA
NA
(2) Flood Flow
M. Caddell
02/23/2018
YES
NO
NO
Perennial
(2) Baseflow
Stream Category Assessor Name/Organization
MEDIUM
Pb1
Stream Site Name Critcher Brothers- Robin Hill Trib B Date of Evaluation
LOW
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
MEDIUM
LOW
NA
NA
MEDIUM
NA
HIGH
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
Function Class Rating Summary
(1) Hydrology
NA
MEDIUM
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
NA
YES
MEDIUM
NA
NA
NA
NA
HIGH
HIGH
MEDIUM
LOW
HIGH
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NA
NA
HIGH
NA
LOW
LOW
HIGH
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
(1) Habitat
(2) In-stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In-stream Habitat
(2) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
Overall
NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
LOW
MEDIUM
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
NA
NA
(2) Flood Flow
M. Caddell
02/23/2018
YES
NO
Perennial
(2) Baseflow
Stream Category Assessor Name/Organization
LOW
Pb1
Stream Site Name Critcher Brothers- Robin Hill Upper Date of Evaluation
LOW
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
HIGH
MEDIUM
NA
NA
MEDIUM
NA
HIGH
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
Function Class Rating Summary
(1) Hydrology
NA
MEDIUM
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
NA
YES
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
HIGH
HIGH
MEDIUM
LOW
HIGH
LOW
LOW
HIGH
HIGH
NA
NA
HIGH
NA
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
(1) Habitat
(2) In-stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In-stream Habitat
(2) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
Overall
NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
HIGH
MEDIUM
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
NA
NA
(2) Flood Flow
M. Caddell
2/28/2018
NO
NO
NO
Perennial
(2) Baseflow
Stream Category Assessor Name/Organization
LOW
Pa3
Stream Site Name Critcher Bros - SF Fishing Creek Reach 2 Date of Evaluation
LOW
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
MEDIUM
HIGH
NA
NA
HIGH
NA
HIGH
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
Function Class Rating Summary
(1) Hydrology
NA
LOW
HIGH
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
YES
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW
HIGH
LOW
LOW
LOW
HIGH
LOW
HIGH
LOW
NA
NA
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
(1) Habitat
(2) In-stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In-stream Habitat
(2) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
Overall LOW
LOW
LOW
HIGH
LOW
HIGH
LOW
NA
NA
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
MEDIUM
HIGH
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
Function Class Rating Summary
(1) Hydrology
NA
LOW
HIGH
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
YES
LOW
Stream Site Name Critcher Bros - SF Fishing Creek Reach 3 Date of Evaluation
LOW
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
MEDIUM
HIGH
NA
NA
MEDIUM
NA
HIGH
NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
HIGH
MEDIUM
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
NA
NA
(2) Flood Flow
M. Caddell
2/28/2018
NO
NO
NO
Perennial
(2) Baseflow
Stream Category Assessor Name/Organization
LOW
Pa3
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
(1) Habitat
(2) In-stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In-stream Habitat
(2) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
Overall LOW
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW
HIGH
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
Function Class Rating Summary
(1) Hydrology
NA
LOW
HIGH
LOW
LOW
NA
YES
LOW
Stream Site Name Critcher Bros - SF Fishing Creek Reach 5 Date of Evaluation
LOW
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
MEDIUM
NA
HIGH
NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
NA
NA
(2) Flood Flow
M. Caddell
2/23/2018
NO
NO
NO
Perennial
(2) Baseflow
Stream Category Assessor Name/Organization
LOW
Pa3
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
(1) Habitat
(2) In-stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In-stream Habitat
(2) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
Overall MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
NA
NA
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
Function Class Rating Summary
(1) Hydrology
NA
MEDIUM
HIGH
MEDIUM
HIGH
NA
NO
LOW
Stream Site Name Critcher Brothers- SF Fishing R10 Date of Evaluation
LOW
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
NA
NA
MEDIUM
NA
HIGH
NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
NA
NA
(2) Flood Flow
C. Lanza
02/23/2018
NO
NO
NO
Perennial
(2) Baseflow
Stream Category Assessor Name/Organization
LOW
Pa3
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
(1) Habitat
(2) In-stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In-stream Habitat
(2) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
Overall LOW
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
NA
NA
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW
HIGH
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
Function Class Rating Summary
(1) Hydrology
NA
MEDIUM
HIGH
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
NO
LOW
Stream Site Name Critcher Brothers - SF Fishing R11 Date of Evaluation
LOW
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
NA
MEDIUM
NA
HIGH
NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
NA
NA
(2) Flood Flow
C. Lanza
02/23/2018
NO
NO
NO
Perennial
(2) Baseflow
Stream Category Assessor Name/Organization
LOW
Pa4
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
(1) Habitat
(2) In-stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In-stream Habitat
(2) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
Overall
NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
LOW
MEDIUM
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
NA
NA
(2) Flood Flow
C. Lanza
02/23/2018
YES
NO
NO
Perennial
(2) Baseflow
Stream Category Assessor Name/Organization
MEDIUM
Pa2
Stream Site Name Critcher Brothers- Shew Ridge Trib R2 Date of Evaluation
LOW
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
MEDIUM
NA
MEDIUM
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
Function Class Rating Summary
(1) Hydrology
NA
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
HIGH
NA
YES
MEDIUM
NA
NA
NA
NA
HIGH
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
HIGH
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NA
NA
HIGH
LOW
LOW
LOW
HIGH
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
(1) Habitat
(2) In-stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In-stream Habitat
(2) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
Overall HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
LOW
HIGH
HIGH
NA
NA
HIGH
HIGH
MEDIUM
LOW
HIGH
NA
NA
NA
NA
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
Function Class Rating Summary
(1) Hydrology
NA
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
NA
NO
MEDIUM
Stream Site Name Critcher Brothers- Timber R2a Date of Evaluation
HIGH
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
HIGH
HIGH
NA
NA
HIGH
NA
HIGH
NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
HIGH
MEDIUM
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
NA
NA
(2) Flood Flow
C. Lanza
02/23/2018
YES
NO
NO
Perennial
(2) Baseflow
Stream Category Assessor Name/Organization
HIGH
Pa1
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
(1) Habitat
(2) In-stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In-stream Habitat
(2) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
Overall LOW
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
LOW
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW
MEDIUM
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
Function Class Rating Summary
(1) Hydrology
NA
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
NA
NO
MEDIUM
Stream Site Name Critcher Brothers- Timber R2b Date of Evaluation
LOW
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
HIGH
NA
MEDIUM
NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
MEDIUM
LOW
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
NA
NA
(2) Flood Flow
C. Lanza
02/23/2018
YES
NO
NO
Perennial
(2) Baseflow
Stream Category Assessor Name/Organization
LOW
Pa1
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
(1) Habitat
(2) In-stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In-stream Habitat
(2) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
Overall MEDIUM
LOW
HIGH
LOW
LOW
HIGH
HIGH
NA
NA
HIGH
LOW
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
NA
NA
NA
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
Function Class Rating Summary
(1) Hydrology
NA
MEDIUM
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
NA
YES
LOW
Stream Site Name Critcher Brothers- WF Fishing R1/2 Date of Evaluation
LOW
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
HIGH
MEDIUM
NA
NA
HIGH
NA
HIGH
NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
LOW
MEDIUM
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
NA
NA
(2) Flood Flow
C. Lanza
02/23/2018
YES
NO
NO
Perennial
(2) Baseflow
Stream Category Assessor Name/Organization
LOW
Pa3
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
(1) Habitat
(2) In-stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In-stream Habitat
(2) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
Overall LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
HIGH
LOW
NA
NA
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
MEDIUM
HIGH
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
Function Class Rating Summary
(1) Hydrology
NA
MEDIUM
HIGH
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
NO
LOW
Stream Site Name Critcher Brothers- WF Fishing R4 Date of Evaluation
LOW
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
NA
HIGH
NA
HIGH
NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
LOW
MEDIUM
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
NA
NA
(2) Flood Flow
C. Lanza
02/23/2018
YES
NO
YES
Perennial
(2) Baseflow
Stream Category Assessor Name/Organization
LOW
Pa3
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
(1) Habitat
(2) In-stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In-stream Habitat
(2) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Stream-side Habitat
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
Overall MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
LOW
HIGH
MEDIUM
NA
NA
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
NA
NA
NA
NA
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
Function Class Rating Summary
(1) Hydrology
NA
HIGH
HIGH
LOW
HIGH
NA
NO
LOW
Stream Site Name Critcher Brothers- WF Fishing R5 Date of Evaluation
LOW
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
NA
NA
HIGH
NA
HIGH
NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
NA
NA
(2) Flood Flow
C. Lanza
02/23/2018
YES
NO
NO
Perennial
(2) Baseflow
Stream Category Assessor Name/Organization
LOW
Pa3

APPENDIX 3
USACE Wetland Forms
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation X , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
XNo
XNo X
XNo
X
X
X
X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)

NoYes
1
Is the Sampled Area
Saturated bench along the upstream of Critcher Tributary. Sampling point is within an actively grazed pasture where native vegetation has been
removed and replaced primarily with pasture grasses.
HYDROLOGY
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland? Yes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
14
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
City/County:Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Wilkes
DP1- Wetland A
02/19/18
Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC NC
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
No
Section, Township, Range:I. Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering)
nonestream side area
Datum:-81.02746036.160923LRR P, MLRA 136
NWI classification:Rhodhiss fine sandy loam
Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water Present?
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Field Observations:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals: (B)
5.
6.
7.
8.X
9.X
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:Yes X
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
)5
=Total Cover
FACW
OBL
Yes
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
30
0
30
0
Multiply by:
140
1.70Prevalence Index = B/A =
70
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
0
0
(A)
(B)
(A)
18
25
45
15
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 )
90
Yes30
10
Carex lurida
Juncus effusus 60
10
Platanus occidentalis
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
30 )
Indicator
Status
Dominant
Species?
Yes FACW
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
100.0%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
DP1- Wetland A
3
3
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
170
0
100
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
X
Depth (inches):X
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Loc2
70
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
100
Color (moist)
Matrix
C2.5Y 5/2
2.5Y 5/2
7.5YR 5/83-14
0-3
DP1- Wetland SOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches) Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%%
PL30
Texture
Prominent redox concentrations
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation X , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
XNo
No X X
No X
X
Yes
Yes
Yes X
Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water Present?
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Field Observations:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
City/County:Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Wilkes
DP2- Upland A
02/19/18
Wildlands Holding IV, LLC. NC
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
No
Section, Township, Range:I. Eckardt (Wildlands Enginnering)
nonehillside
Datum:-81.02749536.160975LRR P, MLRA 136
NWI classification:Rhodhiss fine sandy loam
Slope (%):
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)

NoYes
Is the Sampled Area
Sampling point is located on a hillside actively grazed by cattle. Ag. practices have removed most of the forested vegetation.
HYDROLOGY
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland? Yes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals: (B)
5.
6.
7.
8.X
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:Yes X
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
DP2- Upland A
2
2
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
280
0
95
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
100.0%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
30 )
10
Indicator
Status
10
Dominant
Species?
No
No
5Festuca rubra
5Allium
Microstegium vimineum 80
15
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 )
90
1845
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
80
5
(A)
(B)
(A)
240
0
20
Multiply by:
20
2.95Prevalence Index = B/A =
10
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
520
Yes FACW
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
)5
=Total Cover
FAC
FACU
Yes
=Total Cover
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Depth (inches):X
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
%
PL10
Texture
DP2- Upland ASOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches) Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%
Matrix
D10YR 4/3
10YR 4/3
10YR 4/24-14
0-4
Loc2
90
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
100
Color (moist)
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation X , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
XNo
XNo X
XNo
X
X
X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)

NoYes
Is the Sampled Area
Sampling point is within an actively grazed pasture where native vegetation has been removed and replaced with pasture grasses.
HYDROLOGY
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland? Yes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
City/County:Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Wilkes
DP3- Wetland D
02/19/18
Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC. NC
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
No
Section, Township, Range:I. Eckardt (Wildlands)
noneStream side bench
Datum:-81.02819636.160410LRR P, MLRA 136
NWI classification:Rhodhiss fine sandy loam
Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water Present?
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Field Observations:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals: (B)
5.
6.
7.
8.X
9.X
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:Yes X
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
)5
=Total Cover
OBL
FACU
Yes
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
50
0
50
120
Multiply by:
40
2.10Prevalence Index = B/A =
20
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
0
30
(A)
(B)
(A)
2050
15
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 )
100
Yes
Yes
30Festuca rubra
20Juncus effusus FACW
Carex lurida 50
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
30 )
Indicator
Status
Dominant
Species?
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
66.7%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
DP3- Wetland D
2
3
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
210
0
100
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
X
X
X
Depth (inches):X
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Loc2
80
Loamy/Clayey
Sandy
Sandy
100
Color (moist)
Matrix
C2.5Y 4/2
2.5Y 3/2
5YR 4/42-9
0-2
P3- Wetland SOIL
9-14 2.5Y 4/1
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
100
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches) Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%%
PL20
Texture
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation X , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
No X
No X X
No X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water Present?
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Field Observations:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
City/County:Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Wilkes
DP4- Upland D
02/19/18
Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC. NC
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
No
Section, Township, Range:I. Eckardt (Wildlandsm Engineering)
nonehillside
Datum:-81.02824136.160466LRR P, MLRA 136
NWI classification:Rhodhiss fine sandy loam
Slope (%):
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)

NoYes
Is the Sampled Area
Sampling location is in an actively grazed pasture where native vegetation has been removed and replaced primarily with pasture grasses.
HYDROLOGY
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland? Yes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals: (B)
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:Yes X
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
DP4- Upland D
0
1
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
400
0
100
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
0.0%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
30 )
Indicator
Status
Dominant
Species?
Festuca rubra 100
15
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 )
100
2050
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
0
100
(A)
(B)
(A)
0
0
400
Multiply by:
0
4.00Prevalence Index = B/A =
0
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
)5
=Total Cover
FACUYes
=Total Cover
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Depth (inches):X
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
%
PL10
Texture
DP4- Upland DSOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches) Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%
Matrix
C10YR 3/3
10YR 3/3
7.5YR 5/63-14
0-3
Loc2
90
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
100
Color (moist)
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation X , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
XNo
XNo X
XNo
X X
X
X
X
X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)

NoYes
3
Is the Sampled Area
Feature is a heavily trampled oxbow of South Fork Fishing Creek. Cattle trampling and grazing has removed most vegetation.
HYDROLOGY
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland? Yes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
6
8
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
City/County:Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Wilkes
DP5- Wetland F
02/20/18
Wildlands Holdings LLC. NC
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
No
Section, Township, Range:I. Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering)
concaveold oxbow
Datum:81.03152836.158986LRR P, MLRA 136
NWI classification:Codorus loam
Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water Present?
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Field Observations:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals: (B)
5.
6.
7.
8.X
9.X
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:Yes X
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Feature is primarily devoid of vegetation with patches of isolated soft rush.
)5
=Total Cover
FACWYes
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
0
0
0
0
Multiply by:
10
2.00Prevalence Index = B/A =
5
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
0
0
(A)
(B)
(A)
13
15
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 )
5
Juncus effusus 5
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
30 )
Indicator
Status
Dominant
Species?
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
100.0%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
DP5- Wetland F
1
1
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
10
0
5
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
X
Depth (inches):X
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Loc2
100
Loamy/Clayey
Sandy
100
Color (moist)
Matrix
10YR 4/3
2.5Y 4/2
9-14
0-9
DP5- Wetland SOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches) Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
% % Texture
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation X , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
No X
No X X
No X
Yes
Yes
Yes X
Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water Present?
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Field Observations:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
City/County:Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Wilkes
DP6 - Uplands
02/20/2018
Wildlands Holdings IV LLC NC
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
No
Section, Township, Range:I. Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering)
convexdepositional bar
Datum:-81.03140636.158915LRR P, MLRA 136
NWI classification:Codorus loam
Slope (%):
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)

NoYes
Is the Sampled Area
Sampling point is within an actively grassed pasture.
HYDROLOGY
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland? Yes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals: (B)
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:Yes X
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
DP6 - Uplands
1
2
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
40
0
15
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
50.0%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
)
Indicator
Status
Dominant
Species?
Yes5Trifolium repens
Juncus effusus 10
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
)
15
38
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
0
5
(A)
(B)
(A)
0
0
20
Multiply by:
20
2.67Prevalence Index = B/A =
10
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
)5
=Total Cover
FACW
FACU
Yes
=Total Cover
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Depth (inches):X
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
% Texture
DP6 - UplandsSOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches) Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%
Matrix
7.5YR 4/40-14
Loc2
Sandy100
Color (moist)
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation X , Soil X , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
XNo
XNo X
XNo
X
X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water Present?
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Field Observations:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
City/County:Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Wilkes
DP12- Wetland I
02/21/18
Wildlands Holdings IV. LLC NC
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
No
Section, Township, Range:I. Eckardt (Wildlands)
nonestream bank
Datum:-81.03262336.164056LRR P, MLRA 136
NWI classification:Rhodhiss fine sandy loam
Slope (%):
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
3
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)

NoYes
Is the Sampled Area
Saturated bench adjacent to Antioch Trib A. Cattle have trampled and grazed the area.
HYDROLOGY
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland? Yes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals: (B)
5.
6.
7.
8.X
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:Yes X
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
DP12- Wetland
2
3
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
364
0
102
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
FAC
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
66.7%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
25
Acer rubrum
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
Liriodendron tulipifera
30 )
60
Indicator
Status
60
Dominant
Species?
Yes
No
No
2
25
Juncus effusus
1Ranunculus
Microstegium vimineum 15
15
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 )
18
4
513
9
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
40
60
(A)
(B)
(A)
120
0
240
Multiply by:
4
3.57Prevalence Index = B/A =
2
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
30 12 0
Yes FACU
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
)5
=Total Cover
FAC
FACW
Yes
=Total Cover
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
X
Depth (inches):X
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
%
Prominent redox concentrations
Texture
5PL
P12- WetlandSOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches) Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%
Matrix
10YR 4/3
10YR 3/1 7.5YR 4/6
9-14
0-9
Loc2
100
Loamy/Clayey
Sandy
95 C
Color (moist)
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation X , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
No X
No X X
No X
Yes
Yes
Yes X
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)

NoYes
Is the Sampled Area
Sampling point is within an actively grazed pasture.
HYDROLOGY
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland? Yes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
City/County:Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Wilkes
DP8- Upland I
02/21/18
Wildlands Holdings IV LLC. NC
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
No
Section, Township, Range:I. Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering)
hillslope
Datum:-81.03255331.164080LRR P, MLRA 136
NWI classification:Rhodhiss fine sandy loam
Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water Present?
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Field Observations:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals: (B)
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:Yes X
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
)5
=Total Cover
FAC
FACU
Yes
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
40 16 0
Yes
Yes
FACU
FACU
90
0
328
Multiply by:
0
3.73Prevalence Index = B/A =
0
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
30
82
(A)
(B)
(A)
716
15
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 )
32
No2Trifolium repens
Microstegium vimineum 30
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
Liriodendron tulipifera
Quercus alba
30 )
80
Indicator
Status
60
20
Dominant
Species?
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
33.3%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
DP8- Upland I
1
3
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
418
0
112
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Depth (inches):X
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Loc2
100
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
100
Color (moist)
Matrix
7.5YR 4/6
10YR 3/3
1-14
0-1
DP8- Upland SOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches) Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
% % Texture
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation X , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
XNo
XNo X
XNo
X
X
X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)

NoYes
Is the Sampled Area
Saturated hillside that is actively grazed by cattle.
HYDROLOGY
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland? Yes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
6
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
City/County:Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Wilkes
DP9- Wetland K
02/21/18
Wildlands Holdings IV LLC NC
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
No
Section, Township, Range:I. Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering)
nonehillside
Datum:-81.02966436.164403LRR P, MLRA 136
NWI classification:Rhodhiss fine sandy loam
Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water Present?
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Field Observations:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals: (B)
5.
6.
7.
8.X
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:Yes X
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
)5
=Total Cover
FACYes
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
25 10 0
Yes
Yes
FAC
FACU
180
0
100
Multiply by:
0
3.29Prevalence Index = B/A =
0
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
60
25
(A)
(B)
(A)
718
15
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 )
35
Microstegium vimineum 35
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
Liriodendron tulipifera
Acer rubrum
30 )
50
Indicator
Status
25
25
Dominant
Species?
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
66.7%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
DP9- Wetland K
2
3
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
280
0
85
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
X
X
Depth (inches):X
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Loc2
95
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
100
Color (moist)
Matrix
C5Y 4/1
10YR 3/2
7.5YR 4/61-14
0-1
DP9- Wetland SOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches) Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%%
PL5
Texture
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation X , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
No X
No X X
No X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water Present?
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Field Observations:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
City/County:Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Wilkes
DP10-Upland K
02/21/18
Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC NC
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
No
Section, Township, Range:I. Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering)
nonehillside
Datum:-81.02945836.164458LRR P, MLRA 136
NWI classification:Rhodhiss fine sandy loam
Slope (%):
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)

NoYes
Is the Sampled Area
Forested hillside grazed by cattle.
HYDROLOGY
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland? Yes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals: (B)
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:Yes X
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
DP10-Upland K
0
4
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
460
0
115
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
FACU
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
0.0%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
25
Fagus grandifolia
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
Liriodendron tulipifera
Fagus grandifolia
Quercus alba
30 )
90
Indicator
Status
40
30
Yes
Dominant
Species?
Yes25
15
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 )
513
Prevalence Index worksheet:
FACU
Total % Cover of:
0
115
(A)
(B)
(A)
0
0
460
Multiply by:
0
4.00Prevalence Index = B/A =
0
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
45 18
20
0
Yes
Yes
FACU
FACU
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
)5
=Total Cover
=Total Cover
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Depth (inches):X
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
% Texture
DP10-Upland SOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches) Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%
Matrix
7.5YR 5/8
10YR 4/4
1-14
0-1
Loc2
100
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
100
Color (moist)
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation X , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
XNo
XNo X
XNo
X
X
X
X
X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)

NoYes
Is the Sampled Area
Saturated floodplain that is actively grazed by cattle.
HYDROLOGY
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland? Yes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
14
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
City/County:Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Wilkes
DP11- Wetland P
02/22/18
Wildlands Holdings IV LLC. NC
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
No
Section, Township, Range:I. Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering)
concavefloodplain
Datum:-81.03908736.163884LRR P, MLRA 136
NWI classification:Dan River and Comus soils
Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water Present?
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Field Observations:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals: (B)
5.
6.
7.
8.X
9.X
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:Yes X
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
)5
=Total Cover
OBL
FAC
Yes
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
5212
Yes FAC
60
12
0
Multiply by:
10
2.22Prevalence Index = B/A =
5
Yes OBL
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
20
0
(A)
(B)
(A)
4
24
10
15
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 )
20
Yes
Yes
5
5
Alnus serrulata
Microstegium vimineum
5Juncus effusus FACW
Carex lurida 10
7
Acer rubrum
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
Acer rubrum
30 )
10
Indicator
Status
10
Dominant
Species?
Yes
2
FAC
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
100.0%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
DP11- Wetland P
6
6
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
82
0
37
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
X
X
Depth (inches):X
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Loc2
100
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
85 C
Color (moist)
Matrix
2.5Y 3/1
10YR 4/1 5YR 4/6
8-14
0-8
P11- WetlandSOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches) Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%%
Prominent redox concentrations
Texture
15 PL
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation X , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
No X
No X X
No X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water Present?
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Field Observations:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
City/County:Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Wilkes
DP12- Upland P
02/22/18
Wildlands Holdings IV LLC NC
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
No
Section, Township, Range:I. Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering)
nonefloodplain
Datum:-81.03929536.163988LRR P, MLRA 136
NWI classification:Dan River and Comus soils
Slope (%):
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)

NoYes
Is the Sampled Area
Actively grazed floodplain adjacent to Robin Hill Trib.
HYDROLOGY
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland? Yes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals: (B)
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:Yes X
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
DP12- Upland P
1
3
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
255
0
75
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
33.3%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
Salix nigra
30 )
15
Indicator
Status
15
Dominant
Species?
Yes20Ranunculus
Festuca rubra 60
15
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 )
80
1640
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
0
60
(A)
(B)
(A)
0
15
240
Multiply by:
0
3.40Prevalence Index = B/A =
0
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
8315
Yes OBL
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
)5
=Total Cover
FACUYes
=Total Cover
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Depth (inches):X
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
% Texture
DP12- Upland SOIL
9-14 10YR 4/6
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
100
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches) Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%
Matrix
10YR 4/3
10YR 4/4
4-9
0-4
Loc2
100
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
Sandy
100
Color (moist)
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
XNo
XNo X
XNo
X
X
X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water Present?
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Field Observations:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
City/County:Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Wilkes
DP13- Wetland Q
02/22/18
Wildlands Holdings IV LLC NC
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
No
Section, Township, Range:I. Eckardt (Wildlands)
nonehillside
Datum:-81.04148936.162012LRR P, MLRA 136
NWI classification:Fairview sandy loam
Slope (%):
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
8
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)

NoYes
Is the Sampled Area
Feature is a saturated toe of slope within a narrow valley.
HYDROLOGY
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland? Yes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals: (B)
5.
6.
7.
8.X
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:Yes X
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
DP13- Wetland Q
2
3
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
530
0
160
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
66.7%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
Liriodendron tulipifera
Acer negundo
30 )
80
Indicator
Status
50
30
Dominant
Species?
Microstegium vimineum 80
15
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 )
80
1640
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
110
50
(A)
(B)
(A)
330
0
200
Multiply by:
0
3.31Prevalence Index = B/A =
0
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
40 16 0
Yes
Yes
FAC
FACU
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
)5
=Total Cover
FACYes
=Total Cover
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
X
X
Depth (inches):X
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
%
Prominent redox concentrations
Texture
10 PL
P13- WetlandSOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches) Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%
Matrix
10YR 4/1
10YR 4/1 5YR 4/6
6-14
0-6
Loc2
100
Sandy
Sandy
90 C
Color (moist)
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
XNo
No X X
No X
X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)

NoYes
Is the Sampled Area
HYDROLOGY
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland? Yes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
City/County:Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Wilkes
DP14 - Upland Q
02/22/18
Wildlands Holdings IV LLC NC
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
No
Section, Township, Range:I. Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering)
nonehillside
Datum:-81.04145231.161910LRR P, MLRA 136
NWI classification:Fairview sandy loam
Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water Present?
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Field Observations:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals: (B)
5.
6.
7.
8.X
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:Yes X
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
)5
=Total Cover
FAC
FACU
Yes
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
50 20 0
Yes
Yes
FAC
FACW
195
0
60
Multiply by:
150
2.61Prevalence Index = B/A =
75
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
65
15
(A)
(B)
(A)
1128
15
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 )
55
Yes15Polystichum acrostichoides
Microstegium vimineum 40
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Acer negundo
30 )
100
Indicator
Status
75
25
Dominant
Species?
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
75.0%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
DP14 - Upland Q
3
4
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
405
0
155
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Depth (inches):X
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Loc2
100
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
100
Color (moist)
Matrix
5YR 4/6
7.5YR 4/4
1-14
0-1
P14 - Upland SOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches) Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
% % Texture
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
XNo
XNo X
XNo
X
X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water Present?
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Field Observations:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
City/County:Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Wilkes
DP15- Wetland R
02/28/18
Wildlands Holdings IV LLC NC
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
No
Section, Township, Range:I. Eckardt (Wildlands)
concavefloodplain
Datum:-81.04591431.163331LRR P, MLRA 136
NWI classification:Rhodhiss fine sandy loam
Slope (%):
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
14
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)

NoYes
Is the Sampled Area
Feature is a satured shallow depression in the narrow right floodplain of Magnolia Trib.
HYDROLOGY
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland? Yes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals: (B)
5.
6.
7.
8.X
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:Yes X
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
DP15- Wetland R
2
3
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
420
0
120
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
FAC
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
66.7%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
10
Lindera benzoin
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
Fagus grandifolia
30 )
60
Indicator
Status
60
Dominant
Species?
Yes10
Microstegium vimineum 50
15
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 )
50
10
25
25
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
60
60
(A)
(B)
(A)
180
0
240
Multiply by:
0
3.50Prevalence Index = B/A =
0
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
30 12 0
Yes FACU
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
)5
=Total Cover
FACYes
=Total Cover
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
X
X
Depth (inches):X
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
%
PL5
Texture
P15- WetlandSOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches) Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%
Matrix
C10YR 4/1
10YR 3/2
7.5YR 4/64-14
0-4
Loc2
95
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
100
Color (moist)
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
No X
No X X
No X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water Present?
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Field Observations:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
City/County:Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Wilkes
DP16- Upland R
02/28/18
Wildlands Holdings IV LLC NC
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
No
Section, Township, Range:I. Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering)
floodplain
Datum:-81.04591436.163331LRR P, MLRA 136
NWI classification:Rhodhiss fine sandy loam
Slope (%):
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)

NoYes
Is the Sampled Area
Representative upland point adjacent to Wetland R.
HYDROLOGY
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland? Yes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals: (B)
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:Yes X
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
DP16- Upland R
1
5
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
526
0
132
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
FACU
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
20.0%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
70
Ligustrum sinense
Fagus grandifolia
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
Liriodendron tulipifera
30 )
60
Indicator
Status
60
Dominant
Species?
Yes
15
5
Yes2
50
Ilex opaca
Smilax rotundifolia
Allium 5
15
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 )
7
2
1435
4
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
2
130
(A)
(B)
(A)
No
6
0
520
Multiply by:
0
3.98Prevalence Index = B/A =
0
FACU
Yes FACU
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
30 12 0
Yes FACU
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
)5
=Total Cover
FAC
Yes
=Total Cover
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Depth (inches):X
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
% Texture
P16- Upland SOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches) Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%
Matrix
10YR 4/4
10YR 3/4
1-14
0-1
Loc2
100
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
100
Color (moist)
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation X , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
XNo
XNo X
XNo
X X
X
X
X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water Present?
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Field Observations:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
City/County:Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Wilkes
DP17- Wetland T
02/28/18
Wildlands Holdings IV LLC NC
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
No
Section, Township, Range:I. Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering)
concavehillside crenulation
Datum:-81.04943836.168587LRR P, MLRA 136
NWI classification:Rhodhiss fine sandy loam
Slope (%):
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
3
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)

NoYes
1
Is the Sampled Area
Feature is a hillside crenulation devoid of vegetation.
HYDROLOGY
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland? Yes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals: (B)
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: X
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:Yes X
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
DP17- Wetland T
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
30 )
Indicator
Status
Dominant
Species?
15
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 )
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
(A)
(B)
(A)
Multiply by:
Prevalence Index = B/A =
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Concave feature devoid of vegetation.
)5
=Total Cover
=Total Cover
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
X
X
Depth (inches):X
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
%
Prominent redox concentrations
Texture
5PL
P17- WetlandSOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches) Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%
Matrix
5Y 5/1
2.5Y 4/1 7.5YR 4/6
3-14
0-3
Loc2
100
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
95 C
Color (moist)
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
No X
No X X
No X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)

NoYes
Is the Sampled Area
Sampling location is a dry hillside adjacent to Wetland T.
HYDROLOGY
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland? Yes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
City/County:Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site Wilkes
DP18- Upland T
02/28/18
Wildlands Holdings IV LLC NC
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
No
Section, Township, Range:I. Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering)
nonehillside
Datum:-81.04952336.168612LRR P, MLRA 136
NWI classification:Rhodhiss fine sandy loam
Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water Present?
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Field Observations:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals: (B)
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:Yes X
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
)5
=Total Cover
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
50 20 0
Yes
Yes
FACU
FACU
0
0
500
Multiply by:
0
4.00Prevalence Index = B/A =
0
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
0
125
(A)
(B)
(A)
513
15
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 )
25
25
Fagus grandifolia
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
Liriodendron tulipifera
Fagus grandifolia
30 )
100
Indicator
Status
70
30
Dominant
Species?
Yes FACU
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
0.0%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
DP18- Upland T
0
3
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
500
0
125
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Depth (inches):X
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Loc2
100
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
100
Color (moist)
Matrix
10YR 5/8
10YR 4/3
3-14
0-3
DP18- Upland SOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches) Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
% % Texture
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

APPENDIX 4
Jurisdictional Determination

APPENDIX 5
Agency Correspondence

             Wildlands Engineering, Inc.    (P) 704.332.7754  •  1430 S. Mint Street, Suite 104  •  Charlotte, NC 28203 
February 8, 2018 

Byron Hamstead 
USFWS Asheville Field Office 
160 Zillicoa Street 
Asheville, NC 28801 

Subject:  Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site in Wilkes County, NC 

Dear Mr. Hamstead, 

The Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site, as part of the Wildlands Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank, is 
being developed to provide in‐kind mitigation for unavoidable stream channel impacts. Several sections 
of channel and riparian buffers have been identified as significantly degraded. The project will include 
preservation of stream channels, stream enhancement, and stream restoration. The site has historically 
been disturbed due to agricultural use, primarily livestock production.  
We have already obtained an updated species list for Wilkes County from your website 
(https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/wilkes.html). The Rusty‐patched Bumble Bee (Bombus 
affinis) is listed as the only endangered species within the county. The Northern Long‐Eared Bat (Myotis 
septentrionalis) is listed as threatended and the Bog Turtle (Glyptemys muhlenbergii) is listed as 
threatened due to similarity of appearance. We are requesting that you provide any known information 
on these species within the county. The USFWS will be contacted if suitable habitat for any listed species 
is found or if we can determine that the project may affect one or more federally listed species or 
designated critical habitat. 
Please provide comments on any possible issues that might emerge with respect to endangered species, 
migratory birds or other trust resources from the construction of a stream and riparian buffer project on 
the subject property. A site map and a USGS topographic map showing the approximate project area is 
enclosed.  
If we have not heard from you in 45 days we will assume that you do not have any comments regarding 
associated laws and that you do not have any information relavent to this project at the current time.  
We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact us with 
any questions that you may have concerning the extent of site disturbance associated with this project.  
Sincerely, 

Andrea S. Eckardt, Project Manager 
[e-mail] 
704.332.7754 x 101 
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801

March 7, 2018

Ms. Andrea Eckardt
Wildlands Engineering
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203

Dear Ms. Eckardt:

Subject: Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site; Wilkes County, North Carolina
Log No. 4-2-18-154

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the information provided in your
correspondence received via email dated February 8, 2018. We submit the following comments
in accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 661-667e); the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. §4321 et seq.); and
section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).

Project Description
According to your correspondence, you are seeking our comments with regards to potential
impacts to federally protected species that may be associated with the proposed mitigation
project near Antioch, North Carolina. According to the information provided, the proposed
project would entail preservation, restoration and enhancement of several small unnamed
tributaries to Fishing Creek and its unnamed tributaries. The site is currently dominated by
pasture/hay agricultural land use. Areas proposed for preservation are dominated by mixed pine
hardwood forest.

Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species
According to Service records, suitable summer roosting habitat may be present in the project
area for the federally threatened northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis). However, the
final 4(d) rule (effective as of February 16, 2016), exempts incidental take of northern long-eared
bat associated with activities that occur greater than 0.25 miles from a known hibernation site,
and greater than 150 feet from a known, occupied maternity roost during the pup season (June 1
– July 31). Based on the information provided, the project (which may or may not require tree
clearing) would occur at a location where any incidental take that may result from associated
activities is exempt under the 4(d) rule.

While we have no known records for the federally threatened bog turtle (Glyptemys
muhlenbergii) or suitable habitat in the immediate vicinity of the site, occurrences for this
species circle the proposed project area. The southern population of this species is listed as
2

threatened due to similarity of appearance, and is not subject to section 7 consultation. However,
we recommend that a qualified biologist evaluate the site for suitable habitats, identify potential
project-mediated benefits, and develop measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts to this
species that may result from the project. This species occurs in shallow spring-fed fens,
sphagnum bogs, marshy meadows, and pastures with thick grassy cover. Many known habitats
in North Carolina are open and sunny.

The Service does not have records for any other federally protected species or their respective
habitats in the vicinity of the proposed project.

The Carolina Foothills crayfish (Cambarus johni) occurs in Fishing Creek, approximately 1.5
river miles downstream from the proposed project, and the receiving waters of the Yadkin River
support the brook floater (Alasmidonta varicosa). These species area federal species of concern
and are not currently afforded legal protection under the Act. However, incorporating proactive
conservation measures may help preclude the need to list this species in the future. Like most
freshwater mussels, the brook floater is a sessile benthic filter-feeder that is highly sensitive to
aquatic habitat modifications. Eutrophication- and sedimentation-mediated impacts are likely
threats to both of these species. Agricultural runoff may transport toxins that impact both
juveniles and adults. Attenuating these threats may benefit these species.

The Service supports responsible and sustainable stream restoration activities and we offer the
following comments in the interest of protecting fish and wildlife resources:

Stream Buffers
Natural, forested riparian buffers are critical to the health of aquatic ecosystems. They
accomplish the following:

1. catch and filter runoff, thereby helping to prevent nonpoint-source pollutants
from reaching streams;
2. enhance the in-stream processing of both point- and nonpoint-source
pollutants;
3. act as “sponges” by absorbing runoff (which reduces the severity of floods)
and by allowing runoff to infiltrate and recharge groundwater levels (which
maintains stream flows during dry periods);
4. catch and help prevent excess woody debris from entering the stream and
creating logjams;
5. stabilize stream banks and maintain natural channel morphology;
6. provide coarse woody debris for habitat structure and most of the dissolved
organic carbon and other nutrients necessary for the aquatic food web; and
7. maintain air and water temperatures around the stream.

Forested riparian buffers (a minimum 50 feet wide along intermittent streams and 100 feet wide
along perennial streams [or the full extent of the 100-year floodplain, whichever is greater])
should be created and/or maintained along all aquatic areas. Within the watersheds of streams
supporting endangered aquatic species, we recommend undisturbed, forested buffers that are
naturally vegetated with trees, shrubs, and herbaceous vegetation and extend a minimum of
3

200 feet from the banks of all perennial streams and a minimum of 100 feet from the banks of
all intermittent streams, or the full extent of the 100-year floodplain, whichever is greater.)
Impervious surfaces, ditches, pipes, roads, utility lines (sewer, water, gas, transmission, etc.), and
other infrastructures that require maintained, cleared rights-of-way and/or compromise the
functions and values of the forested buffers should not occur within these riparian areas.

Stream Channel and Bank Restoration
A natural, stable stream system is one that is able to transport a wide range of flows and
associated bed load (sediment) while maintaining channel features and neither degrading
(accelerating the erosion of banks and scour of the channel bed) nor aggrading (accelerating the
deposition of sediment within the channel). Alterations to the dimension (cross-sectional view of
the channel), pattern (the sinuosity of the channel), or profile (longitudinal slope) of the stream
channel as well as changes to streambank vegetation, floodplains, hydrology, or sediment input
can significantly alter this equilibrium. Accordingly, we recommend the following:

1. Only the absolute minimum amount of work should be done within stream channels to
accomplish necessary reconstruction. The amount of disturbance to in-stream and
riparian areas should not exceed what can be stabilized by the end of the workday.
Restoration plans should account for the constraints of the site and the opportunities to
improve stream pattern, dimension, and profile with minimal disturbance.

2. All reconstruction work should follow natural channel design methodologies that are
based on the bank-full, or channel-forming, stage of the stream. Bank-full stage
maintains the natural channel dimensions and transports the bulk of sediment over time
(Doll et al. 2003). Natural channel conditions should be identified using a reference
reach (nearby stream reaches that exemplify restoration goals). Restoration design
should match the pattern, dimension, and profile of the reference reach to ensure the
project’s success. The Service is available to assist with the identification of reference
reaches.

3. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area to the
extent possible. Sandbags, cofferdams, bladder dams, or other diversion structures
should be used to prevent excavation in flowing water. These diversion structures should
be removed as soon as the work area is stable. When practical, a pump-around operation
shall be used to divert flow during construction.

4. Equipment should not be operated in the stream unless absolutely necessary. Machinery
should be operated from the banks in a fashion that minimizes disturbance to woody
vegetation. Equipment should be: (a) washed to remove any contaminant residue prior
to project construction, (b) in good working order, and (c) checked to ensure there are no
leaks of potential contaminants (such as oil or other lubricants) prior to and during
construction.

5. Streambanks with deep-rooted woody vegetation are the most stable, and stream
restoration efforts should incorporate the use of native vegetation adapted to the site
conditions. Biodegradable erosion-control materials may be incorporated into
4

bank-restoration design in order to stabilize soils as vegetation becomes established.
Live dormant stakes (such as black willow) may be used to reestablish root structure in
riparian areas. In areas where banks are severely undercut, high, and steep, whole-tree
revetment or rock may be used as a stabilization treatment (small rock, gravel, sand, and
dirt are not recommended due to their erosive nature), and it should not extend above the
bank-full elevation (the elevation of the channel where the natural floodplain begins).
Deep-rooting woody vegetation should be established along banks where any channel
work is accomplished. Tree and shrub plantings should be spaced at intervals no greater
than 10 feet along banks. Vegetated riparian zone widths should be as wide as practical
but should extend at least 30 feet from the stream channel.

6. Adequate measures to control sediment and erosion must be implemented prior to any
ground-disturbing activities in order to minimize effects on downstream aquatic
resources. In North Carolina, non-cohesive and erosion-prone soils are most common in
the felsic-crystalline terrains of the mountain and upper piedmont regions (Miller and
Kochel 2010). Therefore, reconstruction work should be staged such that disturbed areas
would be stabilized with seeding, mulch, and/or biodegradable (coir) erosion-control
matting prior to the end of each workday. No erosion-control matting or blankets should
contain synthetic (netting) materials. Matting should be secured in place with staples;
stakes; or, wherever possible, live stakes of native trees. If rain is expected prior to
temporary seed establishment, additional measures should be implemented to protect
water quality along slopes and overburden stockpiles (for example, stockpiles may be
covered with plastic or other geotextile material).

7. Woody debris, detritus, and other vegetative materials are the main sources of nutrients
and carbon necessary for primary productivity in stream ecosystems. Removal of this
material can impact the production of higher trophic levels, including fish. The Service
does not recommend the removal of woody debris within the stream channel or
floodplain unless it is causing a debris blockage (logjam) or will affect the ability to
achieve bank stability along a specific reach of stream. Woody debris that must be
removed should be chipped on the site.

8. At each restoration site, cross-sections (at intervals based on restoration reach size),
longitudinal profiles, and stream-pattern plans should be measured and mapped prior to
and immediately following any channel work. In addition, photographs should be taken
to document the condition of the project site prior to initiating the work and upon
completion of the work. However, since a project’s restoration success does not
necessarily equate to biological success, the ecological goals of the project should be
clearly defined and assessed for improvement after construction is completed (Palmer
et al. 2005).

Stream Crossings
In the interest of preserving natural resources and specifically, aquatic habitats for the purposes
of conservation, bridges or spanning structures should be used for all permanent roadway
crossings of streams and associated wetlands. Structures should span the channel and the
5

floodplain in order to minimize impacts to aquatic resources, allow for the movement of aquatic
and terrestrial organisms, and eliminate the need to place fill in streams and floodplains.

Bridges should be designed and constructed so that no piers or bents are placed in the stream,
approaches and abutments do not constrict the stream channel, and the crossing is perpendicular
to the stream. Spanning some or all of the floodplain allows the stream to access its floodplain
and dissipate energy during high flows and also provides for terrestrial wildlife passage. When
bank stabilization is necessary, we recommend that the use of riprap be minimized and that a
riprap-free buffer zone be maintained under the bridge to allow for wildlife movement. If fill in
the floodplain is necessary, floodplain culverts should be added through the fill to allow the
stream access to the floodplain during high flows.

If bridges are not possible and culverts are the only option, we suggest using bottomless culverts.
Bottomless culverts preserve the natural stream substrate, create less disturbance during
construction and provide a more natural post-construction channel. Culverts should be
sufficiently sized to mimic natural stream functions and habitats located at the crossing site;
allow for water depth, volume (flow), and velocity levels that will permit aquatic organism
passage; and accommodate the movement of debris and bed material during bank-full events.
Widening the stream channel must be avoided.

Where traditional culverts are the only feasible alternative to accommodate necessary stream
crossings, we recommend the use of multiple barrels, in addition to the low-flow barrel, to
convey flood flows. Floodplain barrels should be placed on or near stream bank-full or
floodplain bench elevation and discharge onto floodplain benches. Where appropriate, install
sills on the upstream end of floodplain barrels to restrict or divert the base stream flow to a single
barrel. If the culvert is longer than 40 linear feet, alternating or notched baffles should be
installed in a manner that mimics the existing stream pattern. This will enhance the passage of
aquatic life by: (1) depositing and retaining sediment in the barrel, (2) maintaining channel
depth and flow regimes, and (3) providing resting places for fish and other aquatic organisms.

Erosion and Sediment Control
Measures to control sediment and erosion should be installed before any ground-disturbing
activities occur. Instream work should occur under dry conditions utilizing a temporary
diversion/pump-around system. Grading and backfilling should be minimized, and existing
native vegetation should be retained (if possible) to maintain riparian cover for fish and wildlife.
Disturbed areas should be revegetated with native grass and tree species as soon as the project is
completed. Ground disturbance should be limited to what will be stabilized quickly, preferably
by the end of the workday. Natural fiber matting (coir) should be used for erosion control as
synthetic netting can trap animals and persist in the environment beyond its intended purpose.

6

The Service appreciates the opportunity to provide these comments. Please contact Mr. Byron
Hamstead of our staff at 828/258-3939, Ext. 225, if you have any questions. In any future
correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-18-154.

Sincerely,

- - original signed - -

Janet Mizzi
Field Supervisor

References

Doll, B.A., G.L. Grabow, K.R. Hall, J. Halley, W.A. Harman, G.D. Jennings, and
D.E. Wise. 2003. Stream Restoration: A Natural Channel Design Handbook.
North Carolina Stream Restoration Institute, North Carolina State University.
128 pp.

Hall, K. 2003. Recommended Native Plant Species for Stream Restoration in North
Carolina. Raleigh: North Carolina Stream Restoration Institute, North Carolina
State University.

Miller, J.R., and Kochel, R.C. 2010. Assessment of channel dynamics, in-stream
structures and post-project channel adjustments in North Carolina and its
implications to effective stream restoration. Environmental Earth Sciences, 59(8),
pp. 1681-1692.

Palmer, M.A., E.S. Bernhardt, J.D. Allan, P.S. Lake, G. Alexander, S. Brooks, J. Carr,
S. Clayton, C.N. Dahm, J. Follstad Shah, and D.L. Galat. 2005. Standards for
ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42(2),
pp. 208-217.

             Wildlands Engineering, Inc.    (P) 704.332.7754  •  1430 S. Mint Street, Suite 104  •  Charlotte, NC 28203 
February 8, 2018 

Shannon Deaton 
North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission 
Division of Inland Fisheries 
1721 Mail Service Center 
Raleigh, NC 27699 

Subject:  Critcher Brothers Mitigation SIte in Wilkes County, NC 

Dear Ms. Deaton, 

The purpose of this letter is to request review and comment on any possible issues that might emerge 
with respect to fish and wildife issues associated with a potential stream restoration project on the 
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site. A site map and USGS topographic map showing the approximate 
project area are enclosed.  The topographic figure was prepared from the Roaring River USGS 7.5‐
minute topographic quadrangle. 
The Critcher Brothers Mitigation Bank, as part of the Wildlands Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank, 
is being developed to provide in‐kind mitigation for unavoidable stream channel impacts. Several 
sections of channels have been identified as significantly degraded. The project will include preservation 
of stream channels, stream enhancement, and stream restoration. The site has historically been 
disturbed due to agricultural use, primarily livestock production.  
We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact us with 
any questions that you may have concerning the extent of site disturbance associated with this project.  
Sincerely, 

Andrea S. Eckardt, Project Manager 
[e-mail] 
704.332.7754 x 101 

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Gordon Myers, Executive Director

Mailing Address: Habitat Conservation • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
March 14, 2018

Andrea Eckardt
Wildlands Engineering
1430 S. Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203

SUBJECT: Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site

Dear Ms. Eckardt:

Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) received your February 8,
2018 letter regarding plans for a stream restoration project on unnamed tributaries to Fishing Creek in
Wilkes County. You requested review and comment on any possible issues that might emerge with
respect to fish and wildlife associated with the project. Our comments on this project are offered for your
consideration under provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (33 U.S.C. 466 et. seq.) and Fish and
Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).

Details were not provided in the letter on design nor the size of the project. The project is proposed as a
mitigation project and will involve stream enhancement, restoration, and preservation. NCWRC staff did
attend an agency site visit in the fall of 2017, and our comments on the site were incorporated in a
summary of this site visit.

This project should not impact wild trout resources. We recommend that riparian buffers that are to be
reestablished be as wide as possible, given site constraints and landowner needs. NCWRC generally
recommends a woody buffer of 100 feet on perennial streams to maximize the benefits of buffers,
including bank stability, stream shading, treatment of overland runoff, and wildlife habitat.

Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. Please contact me at (828) 803-
6054 if you have any questions about these comments.

Sincerely,
Andrea Leslie
Mountain Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program

             Wildlands Engineering, Inc.    (P) 704.332.7754  •  1430 S. Mint Street, Suite 104  •  Charlotte, NC 28203 
February 8, 2018 

Renee Gledhill‐Earley 
State Historic Preservation Office 
4617 Mail Service Center 
Raleigh, NC 27699‐4617 

Subject:  Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site in Wilkes County, NC 

Dear Ms. Gledhill‐Earley, 

Wildlands Engineering, Inc. requests review and comment on any possible issues that might emerge 
with respect to archaeological or cultural resources associated with a potential stream restoration 
project on the Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site.  A Site Map and USGS Topographic Map with 
approximate project area are enclosed. The topographic figure was prepared from the Roaring River 
USGS 7.5‐minute topographic quadrangle. 
The Crithcher Brothers Mitigation Bank Site, as part of the Wildlands Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation 
Bank, is being developed to provide in‐kind mitigation for unavoidable stream channel impacts. Several 
sections of channels have been identified as significantly degraded. The project will include preservation 
of stream channels, stream enhancement, and stream restoration. The site has historically been 
disturbed due to agricultural use, primarily livestock production. No architectural structures or 
achaeological artifacts have been observed or noted during preliminary surveys of the site for 
restoration purposes.   
We ask that you review the site based on the attached information to determine the presence of any 
historic properties.  
We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact us with 
any questions that you may have concerning the extent of site disturbance associated with this project.  
Sincerely, 

Andrea S. Eckardt, Project Manager 
[e-mail] 
704.332.7754 x 101 

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Office of Archives and History
Secretary Susi H. Hamilton Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

March 22, 2018

Andrea Eckardt
Wildlands Engineering
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203

Re: Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site, Wilkes County, ER 18-0399
Dear Ms. Eckardt:
Thank you for your letter of February 8, 2018, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.

The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.

Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
[e-mail]. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,

Ramona M. Bartos

MEETING NOTES

MEETING: IRT Site Walk
CRITCHER BROTHERS Site
Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Yadkin 03040101; Wilkes County, NC
Wildlands Project No. 005-45005

DATE: Monday, December 4, 2017

LOCATION: Antioch Church Road, Robin Hill Road
Roaring Springs, NC

Attendees
Todd Tugwell, USACE
Andrea Leslie, USFWS
Mac Haupt, DWR
Steve Kichefski, USACE
Shawn Wilkerson, Wildlands
Christine Blackwelder, Wildlands

Materials
 Wildlands Engineering Critcher Brothers Site Concept Maps (Figures 10a.1 and 10a.2)
 Wildlands Engineering’s Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank Pre-Prospectus

Meeting Notes
The meeting began at 10:15 am. Shawn presented an overview of the project at the parking location. From
there, the group proceeded to walk the entire site in the following general order: Critcher Tributary Watershed,
SF Fishing Creek to the Antioch Tributary confluence, Antioch Tributary Watershed, SF Fishing Creek to the
Chicken Tributary 1 confluence, Chicken Tributary Watershed, SF Fishing Creek to the Robin Hill Trib confluence,
Robin Hill Tributary watershed, Oak Tributary, the remainder of the SF Fishing Creek reaches, WF Fishing Creek
Reach 5, Timber Tributary, WF Fishing Creek Reaches 2-4 (working upstream), Shew Ridge Tributary, WF Fishing
Creek Reach 1, Magnolia Tributary, and Ironwood Tributary.
The group generally agreed upon the following ratios across the site for proposed approaches, except as noted
in the detailed stream reach notes below. Preservation ratios were not directly discussed in the field.
 Restoration - 1:1
 Enhancement I – 1.5:1
 Enhancement II – 2.5:1
The meeting concluded at 4:30 PM.
For organizational purposes, the meeting notes are arranged by stream reach, from upstream to downstream,
east to west.

Wildlands Engineering, Inc. page 2
CRITCHER BROTHERS Site- Yadkin Valley UMB
December 4, 2017 IRT Site Walk Meeting Notes
1. South Fork Fishing Creek
 Reach 1 – Enhancement II
o SF Fishing Creek Reach 1 will be enhanced with plantings and cattle exclusion. Spot bank repair
may be included in the treatment of the reach. The existing bedform is diverse and desirable.
o Andrea Leslie quickly reviewed instream macroinvertebrates in a riffle and observed only tolerant
species.
 Reach 2 - Restoration
o SF Fishing Creek Reach 2 will be fully restored due to heavy erosion, unstable meander geometry,
and poor bedform diversity. Cattle have full access to channel.
o Steve Kichefski asked about plan for low quality wetlands present in old meander scar. Shawn and
Christine indicated design could work to leave these as an ephemeral feature. The cut fill balance
on this system will require that ephemeral pools are included in the floodplain, which should
support wetlands.
 Reach 3 - Restoration
o SF Fishing Creek Reach 3’s condition is similar to Reach 2, with heavy erosion, unstable meander
geometry, and poor bedform diversity. Cattle have full access to channel.
o Eroded drainage feature joining Reach 3 from the right floodplain will be treated with a BMP,
likely a wetland cell.
 Reach 4 – Enhancement II
o SF Fishing Creek Reach 4 will be enhanced by removing cattle access.
o IRT members felt that although cattle access this reach, due to the existing bedrock bedform, the
impacts are minimal. IRT noted a higher ratio such as 5:1 has been applied to similar
Enhancement II reaches on other projects.
o Group agreed this reach break will end at the downstream side of the stream crossing.
 Reaches 5, 6, and 7 - Restoration
o These reaches will be fully restored due to heavy erosion, unstable meander geometry, and poor
bedform diversity. Cattle have full access to these reaches and will be excluded.
 Reach 8 – Enhancement II
o This reach has good bedform, but spot areas of erosion. The reach is confined by a farm road
which parallels the right bank. Cattle do not access this reach. This reach is proposed for
enhancement, to include decommissioning the road, spot bank repair, and replanting the buffer.
o Mac Haupt asked if Wildlands may consider creating a bench while decommissioning the road.
Wildlands will consider this design option.
 Reaches 9 and 10 - Restoration
o These reaches are proposed for full restoration due to heavy erosion and unstable meander
geometry.

Wildlands Engineering, Inc. page 3
CRITCHER BROTHERS Site- Yadkin Valley UMB
December 4, 2017 IRT Site Walk Meeting Notes
o Some discussion about whether reach can be enhanced in place to minimize costs. Wildlands
believes that full scale restoration is the only fix, but will evaluate design alternatives once existing
conditions data collection and analysis is complete.
2. Critcher Tributary Watershed
 Critcher Tributary and Critcher Tributary D – Restoration
o These streams are deeply incised and eroded along their length. Cattle have full access to the
streams. A breached dam remnant will be removed from Critcher Tributary Reach 1. The hillside
erosion upstream of the dam may be from where nearby soil was excavated to construct the dam.
In removing the dam, Wildlands will work to rebuild the valley, which may include excavating ½ to
¾ of the dam to reopen the valley, restoring the valley toe upstream of the dam, and removing
some of the sediments upstream of the dam. Design will likely be somewhere between a Priority
1 and 2 as the valley must be reshaped.
o Andrea Leslie inquired about working with NRCS to develop a farm plan to alleviate overgrazing of
hillside. Wildlands will discuss this with the landowners.
o Group inquired about a BMP at the upstream extent of Critcher Tributary to capture hillside
erosion. Shawn discussed a series of check dams in the ephemeral portion of the stream channel
to capture and dissipate flow.
 Critcher Tributary C - Restoration
o This stream is deeply incised and eroded, and originates within a deep gorge at an approximate 15
foot headcut. Cattle have full access to channel, entering from downstream. The design here will
focus on energy dissipation through step structures or similar.
 Critcher Tributary A - Restoration
o This stream is deeply incised and eroded, and runs through a sparsely wooded area at the
upstream extent where trees close to the channel are undermined with roots exposed. Cattle
have full access to the channel. Wildlands will coordinate with the upstream property owner to
see if restoration can extend upstream, or water can be backed up to bring the new channel up to
a Priority 1 more quickly.
3. Antioch Tributary Watershed
 Antioch Tributary Reach 1 and Antioch Tributary C – Enhancement II
o These reaches are above the active headcuts and are relatively stable. Cattle have access to the
streams and trample the steep riparian area and the valley bottom of Antioch Tributary C. These
reaches will be enhanced with cattle exclusion and riparian buffer enhancement as needed.
 Antioch Tributary B Reach 1 and Antioch Tributary B1 – Enhancement II
o These reaches are above the active headcuts and are relatively stable. Cattle have access to the
streams, although the IRT noted that they do not see the impacts from cattle access and believe
these reaches may not be affected by cattle. Shawn indicated that cattle do actively traverse
these areas and that the leaf cover is disguising the level of impact. Wildlands will video the area
in the spring to share with the IRT and will revisit the 2.5:1 credit ratio at that time, if needed.

Wildlands Engineering, Inc. page 4
CRITCHER BROTHERS Site- Yadkin Valley UMB
December 4, 2017 IRT Site Walk Meeting Notes
 Antioch Tributary Reaches 2, 3, and 4; Antioch Tributary A Reach 2; and Antioch Tributary B Reach 2
– Restoration
o These streams are deeply incised with active headcuts progressing upstream. Design will likely be
somewhere between a Priority 1 and 2 as the valley must be reshaped.
 Antioch Tributary A Reach 1 and Antioch Tributary A1 – Enhancement II
o These tributaries are relatively stable, but cattle have access and have trampled the banks. The
upstream landowner’s logging activities have encroached on the knoll between these two
streams. IRT members felt the streams should still be included in the project for credit despite the
logging encroachment and inquired about coordinating with the upstream landowner to extend
the project further upstream. The jurisdictional start for Antioch Tributary A1 is at the property
boundary and is likely just beyond the property boundary for Antioch Tributary A, so extending
the project will add minimal stream length. Wildlands will coordinate with the upstream
landowner.
4. Chicken Tributary Watershed
 Chicken Tributary 1 Reach 1 and Chicken Tributary 1A – Enhancement II
o Cattle access these reaches and cattle exclusion and spot riparian planting is the primary focus of
the enhancement work. Mac Haupt felt that cattle impacts on Chicken Tributary 1 Reach 1 were
minimal due to the bedrock bedform. Todd Tugwell asked if the stream crossing on Chicken
Tributary 1 Reach 1 could be pushed to the upstream project boundary. Christine noted that a
ditch draining the left hillside would make relocation of the crossing to the upstream boundary
challenging. Wildlands will coordinate with the landowner on this crossing to see if any changes
can be made.
 Chicken Tributary 1 Reach 2- Restoration
o Cattle access this reach, and the stream is incised and eroded. This reach will be completely
restored.
 Chicken Tributary 2- Restoration
o Chicken Tributary 2 is incised and eroded, but is very short. Wildlands proposed this reach for
restoration, but upon further field review, believe that this stream is only present because of the
head cut and incision. Wildlands indicated that this reach will likely be restored to a vernal pool
feature. Wildlands will not seek credit for the work.
5. Robin Hill Tributary Watershed
 Robin Hill Tributary, Robin Hill Tributary A, and Robin Hill Tributary B– Restoration
o These streams are deeply incised and eroded. Privet is prevalent in the immediate riparian area,
but is absent from the valley slopes. Massive headcuts are present at the upstream extents of all
reaches, and although only the downstream half of Robin Hill Tributary Reach 2 is directly
accessed by cattle, these reaches are impacted by concentrated agricultural runoff from the cattle
feeding lot upstream. BMPs will be installed upstream of Robin Hill Tributary A and Robin Hill
Tributary B.

Wildlands Engineering, Inc. page 5
CRITCHER BROTHERS Site- Yadkin Valley UMB
December 4, 2017 IRT Site Walk Meeting Notes
6. Oak Tributary
 Reach 1 – Preservation/Restoration
o This is a stream Wildlands just recently discovered on the site. Due to its wooded buffer,
Wildlands assumed that the reach would be suitable for preservation; however, the stream is
incised. Andrea Leslie suggested that the reach is a candidate for restoration. Wildlands will
perform an alternatives analysis before deciding whether to pursue restoration on the reach or to
exclude it from the project.
 Reach 2 - Restoration
o SF Fishing Creek Reach 7 will be fully restored, and Wildlands will restore Oak Tributary Reach 2
through the SF Fishing Creek floodplain to join the two channels.
7. West Fork Fishing Creek
 Reaches 1 and 2 - Restoration
o Full scale restoration is proposed for these reaches due to unstable meander geometry and heavy
erosion. The Reach 2/Reach 3 break will be moved upstream to the large meander to the right as
discussed in the field.
o Wildlands is contacting the upstream landowner to explore opportunities for expanding the
project upstream.
 Reach 3, 4, 5, and 6 – Enhancement I
o These reaches have some inner berm and floodplain bench relief, but feature extensive erosion,
incision, and pinch points throughout their length. Mac Haupt commented on the lack of
bedform diversity due to the heavy sand load. These reaches were originally proposed for
various levels of Enhancement II, I, and Restoration, but through a variety of comments, the IRT
suggested that a consistent Enhancement I approach across all reaches may be more
appropriate. Wildlands will consider consistent Enhancement I to reflect the varying level of in-
channel work, in-stream structures, benching, and spot erosion repair that will be required to
repair the system.
8. Magnolia Tributary
 Reach 1 – Preservation
o Magnolia Tributary Reach 1 has low banks and limited erosion, confined to areas where the
stream has migrated into valley walls.
o Wildlands will contact upstream landowners to explore opportunities for expanding the project
upstream of Magnolia Tributary.
 Reach 2 – Enhancement I
o Magnolia Tributary Reach 2 is accessed on the right bank by cattle, and is eroded and slightly
incised. Enhancement I will include cattle exclusion, benching if needed, bank repair, and
instream structures to improve diversity in trampled areas.
9. Shew Ridge Tributary Watershed
 Shew Ridge Tributary Reach 1 and Shew Ridge Tributary A – Preservation

Wildlands Engineering, Inc. page 6
CRITCHER BROTHERS Site- Yadkin Valley UMB
December 4, 2017 IRT Site Walk Meeting Notes
o Streams are geomorphically stable and have good bedform diversity.
 Shew Ridge Tributary Reach 2 - Restoration
o This short reach is eroded and incised and will be restored down to the WF Fishing Creek
confluence.
10. Ironwood Tributary
 Reach 1– Restoration
o This reach is deeply incised and eroded. Although not directly accessed by cattle, this reach is
impacted by concentrated agricultural runoff from the cattle pasture upstream. A BMP will be
installed upstream of the jurisdictional stream call.
 Reach 2 - Preservation
o As Ironwood Tributary approaches WF Fishing Creek, the stream intersects a bedrock seam and is
a stable, step pool channel. This section will be preserved.
11. Timber Tributary Watershed
 Timber Tributary Reach 1 and Timber Tributary A– Preservation
o These streams are geomorphically stable with diverse and desirable bedform. The reach break on
Timber Tributary will be moved upstream to the meander bend to capture a few additional
unstable areas.
 Timber Tributary Reach 2 - Restoration
o Timber Tributary Reach 2 is unstable with eroded stream banks and areas of incision. Within the
WF Fishing Creek floodplain, this reach is ditched and has limited bedform.
These meeting minutes were prepared by Christine Blackwelder December 6, 2017 and reviewed by Shawn Wilkerson on
December 12, 2017, and represent the authors’ interpretation of events. Please report and discrepancies or corrections
within 5 business days of receipt of these minutes.
APPENDIX 6
Supplementary Design Information
Morphological Parameter Tables
(Existing Conditions, Reference Reaches, Proposed Design Conditions)
Reference Reach Vicinity Map
Design Discharge Overlaid with NC Regional Curve
Sediment Transport Capacity and Competency Summary Tables
stream typedrainage area DA sq mibankfull cross‐sectional areaAbkfSFavg velocity during bankfull eventvbkffpswidth at bankfullwbkffeetmaximum depth at bankfulldmaxfeetmean depth at bankfulldbkffeetbankfull width to depth ratiowbkf/dbkflow bank height feetbank height ratioBHRfloodprone area widthwfpafeetentrenchment ratioERmax pool depth at bankfulldpoolfeetpool depth ratiodpool/dbkfpool width at bankfullwpoolfeetpool width ratiowpool/wbkfBkf pool cross‐sectional area ApoolSFpool area ratioApool/Abkfpool‐pool spacingp‐p feetpool‐pool spacing ratiop‐p/Wbkfvalley slopeSvalleyfeet/ footchannel slopeSchannelfeet/ footsinuosity Kbelt widthwbltfeetmeander width ratiowblt/wbkfmeander lengthLmfeetmeander length ratioLm/wbkfLinear WavelengthLWLinear Wavelength RatioLW/wbkfradius of curvatureRcfeetradius of curvature ratioRc/ wbkfParameter Notation Unitsmin max min max min max min max min max min max min max min max min max min max minmax min max min max min max min max min max min max4.7 6.0 4.4 5.33.4 4.7 2.9 3.84.7 10 8.5 8.90.8 1.5 0.6 0.90.6 1.0 0.5 0.64.6 18 15 164.3 5.4 3.1 6.13.7 5.3 3.5 1011 13 11 121.2 2.4 1.3 1.41.5 2.5 2.0 2.40.9 2.0 1.4 1.51.3 1.7 1.4 1.7‐‐‐‐602012591261372661‐ ‐ ‐‐1658427120.7 30.1‐‐‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐2.06.71.34.90.73.91.94.3‐ ‐ ‐‐3.4125.89.74.46.4‐‐‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐164042521643‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐2432‐‐‐‐1025‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐0.82.11.21.51.13.0‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐5.16.7‐‐‐‐1.22.9‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐7113121526468106‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐7288‐‐‐‐89105‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐3.87.16.17.44.87.5‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐1519‐‐‐‐1012‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐661041952306185‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐6262‐‐‐‐76103‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐3.55.65.56.54.36.0‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐1313‐‐‐‐8.812‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐9.62137641519‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐1217‐‐‐‐1114‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐0.71.10.91.81.11.3‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐3.33.7‐‐‐‐0.81.7‐‐‐‐‐‐Existing Conditions Geomorphic ParametersAntioch C0.002‐‐‐Antioch B R2F4b0.037Chicken Trib 1 R2B4c0.700.0071.7Antioch Trib R3/R4F40.11‐‐‐‐‐1.10.0240.0211.2‐‐‐‐‐‐0.0151.2‐‐1.00.0230.0181.1‐‐‐‐‐‐‐0.0131.1137.50.018‐‐‐‐‐‐‐7.90.0167.89.4111.31.32.68.21.04.2‐‐‐‐3.73.38.00.80.517173.90.74.4Critcher Trib DG4‐‐1.41.2Antioch A R2G40.0322.83.65.20.80.5100.44.31.5‐‐‐‐2.33.92.52.32.97.3Critcher Trib AF40.0939.2‐‐1.5Critcher Trib CF40.0040.72.93.30.30.2167.5264.01.20.6‐‐‐‐‐4.42.7121.72.11.97.71.11.50.0103.83.88.2‐‐‐‐‐ 3.4‐‐‐1.71.31.94.20.9Critcher Trib R3G40.0563.35.14.81.00.77.11.8261.8‐‐‐Critcher Trib R20.031‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐151.61.2132.80.0081.6Critcher Trib R10.016‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐151.0191.81.51.10.0121.00.0110.0051.43.23.2220.6373.0361.91.0351.80.9100+2.8+0.0061.4SF Fishing R3C41.7182.11.3142.61.2603.33.215.80.9281.20.0102.5‐SF Fishing R5F41.8343.8301.91.1265.53.050‐‐‐‐‐461.40.0060.0051.11.7‐‐‐SF Fishing R62.5‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐SF Fishing R72.6‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐0.00871.1Critcher East179 7221 8.8Critcher Trib R4G40.177.35.06.91.61.16.62.22.0371.2244.6SF Fishing R2C41.53611
min max min max min max min max min max min max min max min max min max min max minmax min maxstream typedrainage area DA sq mibankfull cross‐sectional areaAbkfSFavg velocity during bankfull eventvbkffpswidth at bankfullwbkffeetmaximum depth at bankfulldmaxfeetmean depth at bankfulldbkffeetbankfull width to depth ratiowbkf/dbkflow bank height feetbank height ratioBHRfloodprone area widthwfpafeetentrenchment ratioERmax pool depth at bankfulldpoolfeetpool depth ratiodpool/dbkfpool width at bankfullwpoolfeetpool width ratiowpool/wbkfBkf pool cross‐sectional area ApoolSFpool area ratioApool/Abkfpool‐pool spacingp‐p feet ‐ ‐ 58 210 11 43‐‐‐‐319824140‐‐‐‐‐‐27415.914pool‐pool spacing ratiop‐p/Wbkf‐‐1.96.91.87.1‐‐‐‐1.23.90.95 5.4 ‐ ‐‐‐‐‐4.77.20.82 2.0valley slopeSvalleyfeet/ footchannel slopeSchannelfeet/ footsinuosity Kbelt widthwbltfeet ‐ ‐ 70 190‐‐‐‐32725279‐‐‐‐‐‐ 8.114meander width ratiowblt/wbkf‐‐2.36.4 ‐‐‐‐1.32.92.03.1‐‐‐‐‐‐ 1.11.9meander lengthLmfeet ‐ ‐ 360 460‐‐‐‐‐‐190230130200‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐meander length ratioLm/wbkf‐‐1215‐‐‐‐‐‐7.79.45.37.9‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐Linear WavelengthLW ‐‐290160‐‐‐‐‐‐11012067120‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐3743Linear Wavelength RatioLW/wbkf‐‐9.65.2‐‐‐‐‐‐4.54.92.64.7‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐5.16.0radius of curvatureRcfeet ‐ ‐ 50 160 27 86‐‐‐‐34803095‐‐‐‐‐‐21311012radius of curvature ratioRc/ wbkf‐‐3.65.32.514‐‐‐‐2.03.21.63.7‐‐‐‐‐‐1.95.40.81 1.7Existing Conditions Geomorphic Parameters3.53.96.13.1386.6446.15.93.61.15.13.10.760.342.11.616Critcher WestRobin Hill Trib R1/R2 Robin Hill Trib A Robin Hill Trib B5.7SF Fishing Creek R11F46.1673.4302.92.214WF Fishing Creek R63.35.70.850.57112.60.318.12.9G4 G4 G40.038 0.0063 0.00470.00781.1230.94421.00.00861.8431.72.91.6252.21.8144.0SF Fishing Creek R10F42.7443.00.830.00370.00321.21.83.11.4240.782.0541.32.23.90.542.9553.32.6142.03.1142.31.11.9‐1.6180.71251.49.00.62 0.71Timber Trib R2G40.0774.13.17.21.30.58125.06.49.21.60.561.14.30.751.8Ironwood Trib R1G40.0302.92.1190.75390.780.5111F43.4414.92510WF Fishing Creek R4F43.3342.7251.71.319F4WF Fishing Creek R1/R20.810.90301.0170.900.59372.1252.01.51.82.0293.21.61.11.61.22.72.4Parameter1.11.98.64.4121.212Notation Units0.32G4Magnolia R2 Shew Ridge R20.11G48.44.3101.30.834.32.77.31.21.70.0180.00630.0170.0029 0.00471.10.00515.41.5‐8.4 ‐ ‐6.2 ‐ ‐0.044 0.0990.0951.00.0800.0761.00.0421.11.4‐1.9 ‐ ‐9.35.26.95.8330.0690.0611.10.0250.0261.20.00480.00401.2 1.32.1141.41.51.80.0120.0150.764.32.50.49‐‐1.8 ‐230.74 0.952.5281.12.61.65.20.888.92.71.6271.1
min max min max min max min max Min Max min max min max min max min max min max minmaxstream typedrainage area DAsq midesign discharge Qcfsbankfull cross-sectional areaAbkfSFaverage velocity during bankfull eventvbkffpswidth at bankfullwbkffeet6.1 8.4maximum depth at bankfulldmaxfeetmean depth at bankfulldbkffeet1.0 1.1bankfull width to depth ratiowbkf/dbkf5.8 8.0depth ratiodmax/dbkffeet1.3 1.4bank height ratio BHR1.4 2.1floodprone area widthwfpafeet26 31entrenchment ratioER3.7 4.3valley slopeSvalleyfeet/ footchannel slopeSchnlfeet/ foot0.0300 0.0650riffle slopeSrifflefeet/ foot0.6 7.7 0.025 0.073 0.020 0.100 0.01 0.14 0.03 0.28 0.01 0.14 0.03 0.11 0.02 0.20 0.02 0.15riffle slope ratioSriffle/Schnl0.8 9.2 0.6 1.8 2.2 7.3 0.16 2.06 0.30 2.46 0.74 8.59 0.52 1.74 0.29 2.45 0.69 4.49pool slopeSpfeet/ foot0.0 0.1 0 0.015 0.000 0.006 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.08pool slope ratioSp/Schnl1.2 3.8 0 0.4 0.03 0.60 0.06 0.90 0.00 1.84 0.00 2.88 0.00 2.09 0.00 2.46pool-to-pool spacingLp-pfeet28.8 88.5 13.9 30.6 28 63 18.40 26.80 3.10 30.60 6.00 65.00 20.90 45.10 6.30 32.00 12.70 49.40pool spacing ratioLp-p/wbkf1.2 3.8 2.2 4.9 3.9 63.0 2.99 4.35 0.60 6.10 0.38 4.17 5.81 12.53 1.50 7.80 1.43 5.55pool cross-sectional areaApoolSF45.0 76.5pool area ratioApool/Abkf1.2 2.0 1.1 1.4maximum pool depthdpoolfeet2.4 4.1 1.3 3.0pool depth ratiodpool/dbkf1.2 2.1 0.2 0.4pool width at bankfullwpoolfeet19.9 34.7pool width ratiowpool/wbkf1.0 1.8 1.0 1.3sinuosity Kbelt widthwbltfeet62 87.8 18 34meander width ratiowblt/wbkf2.6 3.79.6 13.3linear wavelength (formerly meander length)Lmfeet38.8 76.2 27 94 45 72linear wavelength ratio (formerly meander length ratio)Lm/wbkf1.7 3.27.4 8.6meander length feetN/A N/Ameander length ratioN/A N/Aradius of curvatureRcfeet7.5 38.1 8 26 9 20radius of curvature ratioRc/ wbkf0.3 1.61.5 2.4d16mmd35mmd50mmd84mmd95mmd100mm0.0490UT to Kelly Branch0.0242.4UT to Austin Branch B4a/A4Reference Reach Geomorphic Parameters0.00912.200.0480.0409.42.56.11.08.81.71803112023049.575.90.0257UT to Gap BranchB4a/A40.04191.01.71.020.93.4N/A7.623.51.921.23UT to South CrowdersE40.2222239919.74.41.51.3 N/Ad50 DescriptionN/A0.812.1161122N/AN/A N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AA40.0822449.9NotationUnits1.176.33.3N/AN/ABox Creek Meadow ForkC4 E42.1319.13.61.54.4028.93.4500.12271.02.51.26.92.25 0.00000.84 0.010010.91.391.2N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A783.618.80.84.144.05.1N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A21.43.12.110.41.50>2.2N/A1.7 N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A2.12.41.4N/AN/AN/A170256N/A114259130N/AN/A0.0680N/AN/AN/A3.85.06.20.610.17.11.9>2048Ironwood TributaryA5a+0.03132.74.95.00.80.69.11.32.810.32.10.37819.02102.3256N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A1.19N/A0.1420.1139N/AN/AN/A0.911997128Magnolia TributaryB4c0.316416.04.015.61.61.015.21.61.6N/AN/A0.260.5N/AN/AN/AN/A1.26N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A4096Shew Ridge Tributary A B5a0.0241.13.33.60.50.312.11.71.07.52.10.0650.164.5281202500N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A1.10N/AN/A0.0634N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A4294256UT to South Fork Fishing CreekB5a0.0281.84.14.10.70.49.31.04.47.0N/A0.140.572N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A1.251.70.1030.0815N/AN/A0.331.2112464N/AN/AN/A0.0793.78.90.70.517.0Cross-Section2.91.4Timber Tributary (Mid-Reach)B40.04174.68.84.46.26.21.20.75.75.97.91.10.7N/AN/A0.0334N/AN/AN/AN/A1.41.013.61.50.041SlopeN/AN/A30.01.90.0170.0163N/A1.71126.64.34883128PatternProfileParticle Size Distribution from Reach-wide Pebble Count9.28.081N/AN/AN/A0.493.56.5N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A1.12
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(^_
Box Creek
Meadow Fork
Timber Tributary
UT to Gap Branch
Magnolia Tributary Ironwood Tributary
UT to Kelly Branch
UT to South Crowders
Shew Ridge Tributary A
UT to South Fork Fishing Creek
¹Figure 6-1 Reference Reach Map
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Yadkin River Basin (03040101)
Wilkes County, NC
2014 Aerial Photography
!(Reference Reach Locations
^_Project Location
County Boundaries
Project Streams
0 10 20 30 40 Miles
^_
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(Critcher Brothers
Timber Tributary
Magnolia Tributary Ironwood Tributary
Shew Ridge Tributary A
UT to South Fork Fishing Creek
0 0.5 1 Miles
min max design min max design min max design min max design min max design minmax design min max designstream typedrainage area DA sq mibankfull design dischargeQbkfcfsCross-Section Featuresbankfull cross-sectional areaAbkfSFside slopes H:V ft/ftchannel bottom widthbbkffeetbankfull wetted perimeterWPbkffeetbankfull hydraulic radiusrbkffeetmannings 'n'average velocity during bankfull eventvbkffpswidth at bankfullwbkffeet 18.8 18.8 20.6 23.8 23.8 31.0 31.0mean depth at bankfulldbkffeet 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.9 1.9 2.5 2.5bankfull width to depth ratiowbkf/dbkf12.5 12.5 12.9 12.5 12.5 12.4 12.4maximum depth at bankfulldmaxfeet 1.8 2.4 2.2 1.8 2.4 2.2 1.9 2.6 2.4 2.3 3.0 2.8 2.3 3.0 2.8 2.3 3.0 3.6 2.5 3.4 3.6max depth ratiodmax/dbkf1.2 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.6 1.5bank height ratio BHR 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1floodprone area widthwfpafeet 41 94 41 94 45 103 53 121 53 121 53 121 56 127entrenchment ratio ER 2.2 5.0 2.2 5.0 2.2 5.0 2.2 5.0 2.2 5.0 2.2 5.0 2.2 5.0Slopevalley slopeSvalleyfeet/ footchannel slopeSchannelfeet/ foot 0.0059 0.0064 0.0064 0.0076 0.0082 0.0082 0.0051 0.0055 0.0055 0.0035 0.0038 0.0038 0.0037 0.0040 0.0040 0.0009 0.0009 0.0040 0.0066 0.0072 0.0025Riffle Featuresriffle slopeSrifflefeet/ foot 0.0071 0.0225 0.0091 0.0287 0.0061 0.0192 0.0042 0.0132 0.0044 0.0139 0.0010 0.0033 0.0080 0.0252riffle slope ratioSriffle/Schannel1.2 3.5 1.2 3.5 1.2 3.5 1.2 3.5 1.2 3.5 1.2 3.5 1.2 3.5Pool Featurespool slopeSpoolfeet/ foot 0.0000 0.0026 0.0000 0.0033 0.0000 0.0022 0.0000 0.0015 0.0000 0.0016 0.0000 0.0004 0.0000 0.0029pool slope ratioSpool/Schannel0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40pool-to-pool spacingLp-pfeet 56 131 56 131 62 144 73 169 73 169 73 169 76 178pool spacing ratioLp-p/wbkf3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0maximum pool depth at bankfulldpoolfeet 2.2 5.9 2.2 5.9 2.4 6.5 2.9 7.6 2.9 7.6 2.9 7.6 3.2 8.5pool depth ratiodpool/dbkf1.5 4.0 1.5 4.0 1.5 4.0 1.5 4.0 1.5 4.0 1.5 4.0 1.5 4.0pool width at bankfullwpoolfeet 20.6 37.4 20.6 37.4 22.7 41.2 26.6 48.4 26.6 48.4 26.6 48.4 27.9 50.8pool width ratiowpool/wbkf1.1 2.0 1.1 2.0 1.1 2.0 1.1 2.0 1.1 2.0 1.1 2.0 1.1 2.0pool cross-sectional area at bankfullApoolSF 33.0 68.8 33.0 68.8 40.0 83.3 55.3 115.3 55.3 115.3 55.3 115.3 64.6 134.5pool area ratioApool/Abkf1.2 2.5 1.2 2.5 1.2 2.5 1.2 2.5 1.2 2.5 1.2 2.5 1.2 2.5Pattern Featuressinuosity K 1.20 1.30 1.20 1.20 1.30 1.20 1.20 1.30 1.20 1.20 1.30 1.20 1.20 1.30 1.20 1.20 1.30 1.20 1.20 1.30 1.20belt widthwbltfeet 65 150 65 150 72 165 85 194 85 194 85 194 89 203meander width ratiowblt/wbkf3.5 8.0 3.5 8.0 3.5 8.0 3.5 8.0 3.5 8.0 3.5 8.0 3.5 8.0linear wavelength LW feet 131 224 131 224 144 247 169 290 169 290 169 290 178 305linear wavelength ratioLW/wbkf7.0 12.0 7.0 12.0 7.0 12.0 7.0 12.0 7.0 12.0 7.0 12.0 7.0 12.0meander lengthLmfeet 131 281 131 281 144 309 169 363 169 363 169 363 178 381meander length ratioLm/wbkf7.0 15.0 7.0 15.0 7.0 15.0 7.0 15.0 7.0 15.0 7.0 15.0 7.0 15.0radius of curvatureRcfeet 34 65 34 65 37 72 44 85 44 85 44 85 46 89radius of curvature ratioRc/ wbkf1.8 3.5 1.8 3.5 1.8 3.5 1.8 3.5 1.8 3.5 1.8 3.5 1.8 3.5South Fork Fishing Creek, Reach 10Designed ConditionsC42.7116053.82.511.426.5South Fork Fishing Creek, Reach 7Designed ConditionsC42.5815846.12.512.225.2South Fork Fishing Creek, Reach 8Designed ConditionsC42.6415846.12.512.225.2South Fork Fishing Creek, Reach 2 South Fork Fishing Creek, Reach 3Designed ConditionsC410.619.41.40.0404.3Designed ConditionsC41.841231.6911627.52.59.7South Fork Fishing Creek, Reach 5Designed Conditions18.7C41.4810527.52.59.719.41.40.0403.820.6Designed ConditionsC42.5515846.12.512.225.224.2South Fork Fishing Creek, Reach 633.32.5130.00661.80.0403.421.41.61.9130.0045130.0048120.008624.21.9130.00111.50.0403.71.80.0403.525.42.11.618.71.80.0403.524.21.92.00.0403.01.5130.0077130.0098UnitsNotationDesign Paramaters
stream typedrainage area DA sq mibankfull design dischargeQbkfcfsCross-Section Featuresbankfull cross-sectional areaAbkfSFside slopes H:V ft/ftchannel bottom widthbbkffeetbankfull wetted perimeterWPbkffeetbankfull hydraulic radiusrbkffeetmannings 'n'average velocity during bankfull eventvbkffpswidth at bankfullwbkffeetmean depth at bankfulldbkffeetbankfull width to depth ratiowbkf/dbkfmaximum depth at bankfulldmaxfeetmax depth ratiodmax/dbkfbank height ratio BHRfloodprone area widthwfpafeetentrenchment ratio ERSlopevalley slopeSvalleyfeet/ footchannel slopeSchannelfeet/ footRiffle Featuresriffle slopeSrifflefeet/ footriffle slope ratioSriffle/SchannelPool Featurespool slopeSpoolfeet/ footpool slope ratioSpool/Schannelpool-to-pool spacingLp-pfeetpool spacing ratioLp-p/wbkfmaximum pool depth at bankfulldpoolfeetpool depth ratiodpool/dbkfpool width at bankfullwpoolfeetpool width ratiowpool/wbkfpool cross-sectional area at bankfullApoolSFpool area ratioApool/AbkfPattern Featuressinuosity Kbelt widthwbltfeetmeander width ratiowblt/wbkflinear wavelength LW feetlinear wavelength ratioLW/wbkfmeander lengthLmfeetmeander length ratioLm/wbkfradius of curvatureRcfeetradius of curvature ratioRc/ wbkfUnitsNotationmin max design min max design min max design min max design min max design minmax design31.0 27.0 27.0 26.0 26.0 26.02.5 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.112.4 11.7 11.7 12.4 12.4 12.43.1 4.1 3.6 2.8 3.7 3.5 2.4 3.2 3.5 2.4 3.2 2.9 2.4 3.2 2.9 2.4 3.2 2.91.2 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.6 1.51.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.168 155 61 138 53 120 56 127 56 127 55 1262.2 5.0 2.2 5.0 2.2 5.0 2.2 5.0 2.2 5.0 2.2 5.00.0029 0.0031 0.0025 0.0010 0.0012 0.0020 0.0045 0.0052 0.0044 0.0038 0.0042 0.0040 0.0038 0.0042 0.0040 0.0042 0.0049 0.00450.0035 0.0109 0.0012 0.0041 0.0054 0.0182 0.0046 0.0146 0.0046 0.0146 0.0051 0.01721.2 3.5 1.2 3.5 1.2 3.5 1.2 3.5 1.2 3.5 1.2 3.50.0000 0.0012 0.0000 0.0005 0.0000 0.0021 0.0000 0.0017 0.0000 0.0017 0.0000 0.00200.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.4093 217 83 193 72 168 76 177 76 177 75 1763.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 7.03.8 10.2 3.4 9.2 3.0 8.0 3.0 7.9 3.0 7.9 3.0 7.91.5 4.0 1.5 4.0 1.5 4.0 1.5 4.0 1.5 4.0 1.5 4.034.1 62.0 30.3 55.0 26.4 48.0 27.8 50.6 27.8 50.6 27.6 50.21.1 2.0 1.1 2.0 1.1 2.0 1.1 2.0 1.1 2.0 1.1 2.095.2 198.3 75.6 157.6 57.8 120.4 60.2 125.5 60.2 125.5 59.6 124.11.2 2.5 1.2 2.5 1.2 2.5 1.2 2.5 1.2 2.5 1.2 2.51.20 1.30 1.20 1.20 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.30 1.20 1.20 1.30 1.20 1.20 1.40 1.20109 248 96 220 84 192 89 202 89 202 88 2013.5 8.0 3.5 8.0 3.5 8.0 3.5 8.0 3.5 8.0 3.5 8.0217 372 193 330 168 288 177 304 177 304 176 3017.0 12.0 7.0 12.0 7.0 12.0 7.0 12.0 7.0 12.0 7.0 12.0217 465 193 413 168 360 177 380 177 380 176 3777.0 15.0 7.0 15.0 7.0 15.0 7.0 15.0 7.0 15.0 7.0 15.056 109 50 96 43 84 46 89 46 89 45 881.8 3.5 1.8 3.5 1.8 3.5 1.8 3.5 1.8 3.5 1.8 3.530079.32.514.02.50.0403.431.02.62.20.0402.827.52.3120.00140.0403.625.32.0130.00500.0403.625.32.0South Fork Fishing Creek, Reach 110.0403.824.02.0120.0063West Fork Fishing Creek, Reach 1Designed ConditionsC43.1217763.02.512.028.732.3West Fork Fishing Creek, Reach 2Designed Conditions120.0037Designed ConditionsC46.17West Fork Fishing Creek, Reach 3Designed ConditionsC43.2518250.22.512.826.32.512.826.31.9C43.2418248.22.510.525.11.91.9130.0050West Fork Fishing Creek, Reach 5Designed ConditionsC43.3919049.62.512.626.11.90.0403.825.12.0130.0059West Fork Fishing Creek, Reach 4Designed ConditionsC43.2918450.2Design Paramaters
stream typedrainage area DA sq mibankfull design dischargeQbkfcfsCross-Section Featuresbankfull cross-sectional areaAbkfSFside slopes H:V ft/ftchannel bottom widthbbkffeetbankfull wetted perimeterWPbkffeetbankfull hydraulic radiusrbkffeetmannings 'n'average velocity during bankfull eventvbkffpswidth at bankfullwbkffeetmean depth at bankfulldbkffeetbankfull width to depth ratiowbkf/dbkfmaximum depth at bankfulldmaxfeetmax depth ratiodmax/dbkfbank height ratio BHRfloodprone area widthwfpafeetentrenchment ratio ERSlopevalley slopeSvalleyfeet/ footchannel slopeSchannelfeet/ footRiffle Featuresriffle slopeSrifflefeet/ footriffle slope ratioSriffle/SchannelPool Featurespool slopeSpoolfeet/ footpool slope ratioSpool/Schannelpool-to-pool spacingLp-pfeetpool spacing ratioLp-p/wbkfmaximum pool depth at bankfulldpoolfeetpool depth ratiodpool/dbkfpool width at bankfullwpoolfeetpool width ratiowpool/wbkfpool cross-sectional area at bankfullApoolSFpool area ratioApool/AbkfPattern Featuressinuosity Kbelt widthwbltfeetmeander width ratiowblt/wbkflinear wavelength LW feetlinear wavelength ratioLW/wbkfmeander lengthLmfeetmeander length ratioLm/wbkfradius of curvatureRcfeetradius of curvature ratioRc/ wbkfUnitsNotationmin max design min max design min max design min max design min max design minmax design min max design min max design6.0 6.1 8.3 11.4 9.0 4.0 4.0 6.00.5 0.5 0.6 0.9 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.512.0 12.2 13.8 12.7 12.9 12.3 12.3 12.00.5 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.7 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.5 1.5 0.8 1.0 1.0 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.50.5 0.6 0.71.2 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.6 1.6 1.2 1.6 1.61.2 1.6 1.51.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.16 10 9 13 12 18 24 55 13 20 5 7 4 8 6 101.2 2.2 1.4 2.2 1.4 2.2 2.2 5.0 1.4 2.2 1.4 2.2 1.2 2.2 1.2 2.20.0383 0.0421 0.0401 0.0270 0.0297 0.0270 0.0231 0.0254 0.0231 0.0056 0.0061 0.0061 0.0217 0.0239 0.0185 0.0855 0.0940 0.0200 0.0460 0.0506 0.04820.0294 0.0323 0.03390.0421 0.1263 0.0324 0.1337 0.0277 0.1143 0.0067 0.0152 0.0261 0.1076 0.1025 0.2820 0.0552 0.1518 0.0323 0.09691.1 3.0 1.2 4.5 1.2 4.5 1.2 2.5 1.2 4.5 1.2 3.0 1.2 3.0 1.1 3.00.0000 0.0168 0.0000 0.0119 0.0000 0.0102 0.0000 0.0024 0.0000 0.0096 0.0000 0.0376 0.0000 0.0202 0.0000 0.01290.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.407 24 9 31 12 42 33 110 14 45 3 17 4 18 7 231.5 5.0 1.5 5.0 1.5 5.0 3.0 10.0 1.5 5.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 5.0 1.5 5.00.5 1.2 0.6 1.5 0.7 1.8 1.4 3.2 0.8 1.9 0.4 0.8 0.5 1.0 0.5 1.21.2 3.0 1.2 3.0 1.2 3.0 1.5 3.5 1.2 3.0 1.5 3.0 1.5 3.0 1.2 3.04.7 6.6 6.1 8.5 8.3 11.6 12.1 16.5 9.0 12.6 3.3 4.6 3.6 5.0 4.6 6.41.0 1.4 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.4 1.1 1.5 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.41.9 4.8 3.0 7.6 5.0 12.6 11.1 30.2 5.7 14.2 0.9 2.3 1.2 2.9 1.9 4.71.0 2.5 1.0 2.5 1.0 2.5 1.1 3.0 1.0 2.5 1.0 2.5 1.0 2.5 1.0 2.51.00 1.10 1.05 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.20 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.05 1.00 1.10 1.05 1.00 1.10 1.055 14 6 18 8 25 33 110 9 27 3 10 4 11 5 141.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 10.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 3.0N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 77 132 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AN/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7.0 12.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AN/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 77 132 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AN/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7.0 12.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A9471261178320391890N/AN/A736 9462.0 10.0 2.0 10.0 2.0 10.0 1.8 3.5 2.0 10.0 2.0 10.0 2.0 10.0 2.0 10.00.0503.24.70.4120.0421Critcher Tributary, Reach 2Designed ConditionsB40.03103.02.52.66.40.50.0453.36.10.5120.0297Critcher Tributary, Reach 1Designed ConditionsB4c0.07165.03.02.98.60.4A40.0261.92.51.74.90.60.0503.28.30.6140.0254Critcher Tributary, Reach 4Designed ConditionsC40.172710.12.54.511.50.90.0402.711.00.9120.0073Critcher Tributary, Reach 3Designed Conditions0.40.0502.94.60.4110.0323Antioch Tributary, Reach 2Designed ConditionsA40.0261.92.51.64.8Designed Conditions0.30.0403.69.00.6140.0239Critcher Tributary CDesigned ConditionsB3c0.0020.92.51.33.50.30.0352.53.30.3120.0940Critcher Tributary A3.60.3110.0506Critcher Tributary DDesigned ConditionsA30.01Design Paramaters0.0503.041.22.51.13.80.6B4c0.09205.73.03.69.3
stream typedrainage area DA sq mibankfull design dischargeQbkfcfsCross-Section Featuresbankfull cross-sectional areaAbkfSFside slopes H:V ft/ftchannel bottom widthbbkffeetbankfull wetted perimeterWPbkffeetbankfull hydraulic radiusrbkffeetmannings 'n'average velocity during bankfull eventvbkffpswidth at bankfullwbkffeetmean depth at bankfulldbkffeetbankfull width to depth ratiowbkf/dbkfmaximum depth at bankfulldmaxfeetmax depth ratiodmax/dbkfbank height ratio BHRfloodprone area widthwfpafeetentrenchment ratio ERSlopevalley slopeSvalleyfeet/ footchannel slopeSchannelfeet/ footRiffle Featuresriffle slopeSrifflefeet/ footriffle slope ratioSriffle/SchannelPool Featurespool slopeSpoolfeet/ footpool slope ratioSpool/Schannelpool-to-pool spacingLp-pfeetpool spacing ratioLp-p/wbkfmaximum pool depth at bankfulldpoolfeetpool depth ratiodpool/dbkfpool width at bankfullwpoolfeetpool width ratiowpool/wbkfpool cross-sectional area at bankfullApoolSFpool area ratioApool/AbkfPattern Featuressinuosity Kbelt widthwbltfeetmeander width ratiowblt/wbkflinear wavelength LW feetlinear wavelength ratioLW/wbkfmeander lengthLmfeetmeander length ratioLm/wbkfradius of curvatureRcfeetradius of curvature ratioRc/ wbkfUnitsNotationmin max design min max design min max design min max design min max design minmax design min max design min max design min max design8.0 9.6 7.0 8.0 15.2 6.0 7.4 3.5 3.50.6 0.8 0.5 0.6 1.2 0.5 0.6 0.3 0.313.3 12.0 14.0 13.3 12.7 12.0 12.3 11.7 11.70.7 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.2 0.6 0.9 0.8 0.7 1.0 0.9 1.4 1.9 2.0 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.9 0.90.4 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.51.2 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.6 1.51.2 1.6 1.6 1.2 1.6 1.61.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.010 16 21 48 10 16 17 39 33 76 6 12 16 37 4 7 3 61.4 2.2 2.2 5.0 1.4 2.2 2.2 5.0 2.2 5.0 1.2 2.2 2.2 5.0 1.2 2.2 1.2 2.20.0247 0.0272 0.0247 0.0175 0.0192 0.0175 0.0252 0.0277 0.0264 0.0082 0.0090 0.0086 0.0078 0.0084 0.0088 0.0396 0.0436 0.0415 0.0155 0.0168 0.01680.0904 0.0994 0.0947 0.0728 0.0801 0.07630.0297 0.1224 0.0210 0.0864 0.0302 0.1247 0.0098 0.0225 0.0093 0.0210 0.0396 0.1308 0.0186 0.0754 0.1084 0.2982 0.0874 0.24031.2 4.5 1.2 4.5 1.2 4.5 1.2 2.5 1.2 2.5 1.0 3.0 1.2 4.5 1.2 3.0 1.2 3.00.0000 0.0109 0.0000 0.0077 0.0000 0.0111 0.0000 0.0036 0.0000 0.0034 0.0000 0.0174 0.0000 0.0067 0.0000 0.0398 0.0000 0.03200.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.4011 36 14 48 11 37 23 78 46 152 8 27 11 37 3 15 3 151.5 5.0 1.5 5.0 1.5 5.0 3.0 10.0 3.0 10.0 1.5 5.0 1.5 5.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 5.00.7 1.8 0.9 2.2 0.6 1.6 0.9 2.1 1.8 4.1 0.6 1.4 0.6 1.6 0.4 0.9 0.4 0.91.2 3.0 1.2 3.0 1.2 3.0 1.5 3.5 1.5 3.5 1.2 3.0 1.2 3.0 1.5 3.0 1.5 3.07.1 9.9 9.6 13.4 7.4 10.4 7.8 11.7 16.7 22.8 5.4 7.6 7.4 10.4 3.0 4.2 2.9 4.11.0 1.4 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.5 1.1 1.5 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.44.4 10.9 7.1 17.8 4.0 10.0 4.6 13.9 19.7 53.8 2.6 6.4 4.0 10.0 0.9 2.2 0.8 2.11.0 2.5 1.0 2.5 1.0 2.5 1.0 3.0 1.1 3.0 1.0 2.5 1.0 2.5 1.0 2.5 1.0 2.51.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 1.05 1.00 1.10 1.05 1.20 1.30 1.15 1.00 1.10 1.05 1.20 1.30 1.20 1.00 1.10 1.05 1.00 1.10 1.057 21 10 29 7 22 23 78 46 152 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A1.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 10.0 3.0 10.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AN/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 55 94 106 182 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AN/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7.0 12.0 7.0 12.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AN/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 55 94 106 228 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AN/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7.0 12.0 7.0 15.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A14 71 17 34 15 74 14 27 27 53 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A2.0 10.0 1.8 3.5 2.0 10.0 1.8 3.5 1.8 3.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A0.0553.12.90.3100.08010.52.87.44.03.02.67.70.30.045Robin Hill Tributary BDesigned ConditionsA30.0130.82.50.43.10.5140.0201Robin Hill Tributary ADesigned ConditionsA30.0130.92.50.53.20.30.0553.53.00.3100.0994Robin Hill Tributary, Reach 2Designed ConditionsC40.04110.0403.815.21.2130.0101Robin Hill Tributary, Reach 1Designed ConditionsA40.0392.62.51.95.70.50.0503.65.40.5110.0436Chicken Tributary 1, Reach 2Designed ConditionsC40.706817.92.57.215.80.6B40.07164.42.52.67.40.6 1.10.0453.67.10.6120.0272Antioch Tributary, Reach 4Designed ConditionsC40.11227.12.54.610.00.70.0503.19.60.7130.0192Antioch Tributary, Reach 3Designed ConditionsAntioch Tributary A, Reach 2Designed ConditionsB40.03104.03.02.67.70.50.0452.87.40.5140.02777.80.6130.0090Antioch Tributary B, Reach 2Designed ConditionsC40.04114.62.53.88.1Design Paramaters0.0402.4
stream typedrainage area DA sq mibankfull design dischargeQbkfcfsCross-Section Featuresbankfull cross-sectional areaAbkfSFside slopes H:V ft/ftchannel bottom widthbbkffeetbankfull wetted perimeterWPbkffeetbankfull hydraulic radiusrbkffeetmannings 'n'average velocity during bankfull eventvbkffpswidth at bankfullwbkffeetmean depth at bankfulldbkffeetbankfull width to depth ratiowbkf/dbkfmaximum depth at bankfulldmaxfeetmax depth ratiodmax/dbkfbank height ratio BHRfloodprone area widthwfpafeetentrenchment ratio ERSlopevalley slopeSvalleyfeet/ footchannel slopeSchannelfeet/ footRiffle Featuresriffle slopeSrifflefeet/ footriffle slope ratioSriffle/SchannelPool Featurespool slopeSpoolfeet/ footpool slope ratioSpool/Schannelpool-to-pool spacingLp-pfeetpool spacing ratioLp-p/wbkfmaximum pool depth at bankfulldpoolfeetpool depth ratiodpool/dbkfpool width at bankfullwpoolfeetpool width ratiowpool/wbkfpool cross-sectional area at bankfullApoolSFpool area ratioApool/AbkfPattern Featuressinuosity Kbelt widthwbltfeetmeander width ratiowblt/wbkflinear wavelength LW feetlinear wavelength ratioLW/wbkfmeander lengthLmfeetmeander length ratioLm/wbkfradius of curvatureRcfeetradius of curvature ratioRc/ wbkfUnitsNotationmin max design min max design min max design min max design min max design9.4 11.6 6.2 8.8 8.00.7 0.9 0.5 0.6 0.713.4 12.9 12.4 14.7 11.40.8 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.4 1.4 0.6 0.9 0.8 0.7 1.0 1.0 0.6 0.9 1.01.2 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.6 1.5 1.3 2.0 1.6 1.2 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.6 1.51.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.020 45 26 58 9 14 12 44 7 132.2 5.0 2.2 5.0 1.4 2.2 1.4 5.0 1.2 2.20.0135 0.0147 0.0150 0.0118 0.0128 0.0134 0.0571 0.0685 0.0396 0.0195 0.0230 0.0180 0.0318 0.0350 0.03330.0135 0.0367 0.0118 0.0319 0.0571 0.0514 0.0195 0.0507 0.0318 0.10501.0 2.5 1.0 2.5 1.0 0.8 1.0 2.2 1.0 3.00.0000 0.0059 0.0000 0.0051 0.0000 0.0274 0.0000 0.0092 0.0000 0.01400.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.4027 90 35 116 6 31 26 88 9 303.0 10.0 3.0 10.0 1.0 5.0 3.0 10.0 1.5 5.01.0 2.4 1.3 3.1 0.7 1.4 0.9 2.2 0.6 1.61.5 3.5 1.5 3.5 1.5 3.0 1.5 3.5 1.2 3.09.9 13.5 12.8 17.4 6.2 8.7 9.7 13.2 6.0 8.41.1 1.5 1.1 1.5 1.0 1.4 1.1 1.5 1.0 1.46.7 18.2 11.4 31.0 2.9 7.2 6.0 16.5 3.2 8.01.1 3.0 1.1 3.0 1.0 2.5 1.1 3.0 1.0 2.51.20 1.30 1.17 1.20 1.30 1.14 1.00 1.20 1.13 1.10 1.30 1.15 1.00 1.10 1.0527 90 35 116 N/A N/A 26 88 N/A N/A3.0 10.0 3.0 10.0 N/A N/A 3.0 10.0 N/A N/A63 108 81 139 N/A N/A 62 106 N/A N/A7.0 12.0 7.0 12.0 N/A N/A 7.0 12.0 N/A N/A63 135 81 174 N/A N/A 62 132 N/A N/A7.0 15.0 7.0 15.0 N/A N/A 7.0 15.0 N/A N/A16 32 21 41 N/A N/A 16 35 N/A N/A1.8 3.5 1.8 3.5 N/A N/A 1.8 3.5 N/A N/A0.60.0403.49.00.7130.0176Shew Ridge Tributary, Reach 2Designed ConditionsC40.11216.12.54.59.30.0453.511.60.9130.0153Ironwood Tributary, Reach 1Designed ConditionsB40.0392.93.02.06.40.40.0553.16.20.5130.0685Magnolia Tributary, Reach 2Designed Conditions Designed ConditionsB4c/C40.08175.53.03.49.10.9C40.333610.32.55.612.10.60.0453.28.80.6140.0253Oak TributaryDesigned ConditionsA40.04113.22.52.06.30.50.0503.56.00.5110.0350Timber Tributary, Reach 2Design Paramaters
Stream Reach Drainage Area (sq. mi.)Rural Piedmont Regional Curve (Harman, et. Al, 1999)Rural Piedmont and Mountain Regional Curve (Walker, unpublished) Regional Flood Frequency Analysis 1.2‐yr Regional Flood Frequency Analysis 1.5‐yr Reference Reach Curve Design Discharge (cfs)SF Fishing Creek Reach 21.48 118 76 104 147 108 105SF Fishing Creek Reach 31.69 130 84 114 161 117 116SF Fishing Creek Reach 51.84 138 90 122 171 123 123SF Fishing Creek Reach 62.55 175 116 155 217 150 158SF Fishing Creek Reach 72.58 177 117 156 219 152 158SF Fishing Creek Reach 82.64 179 119 159 222 154 158SF Fishing Creek Reach 102.71 183 122 162 226 156 160SF Fishing Creek Reach 116.17 331 233 297 411 258 300WF Fishing Creek Reach 13.12 203 136 180 251 170 177WF Fishing Creek Reach 23.24 208 140 185 258 174 182WF Fishing Creek Reach 33.25 209 141 185 258 174 182WF Fishing Creek Reach 43.29 210 142 187 261 176 184WF Fishing Creek Reach 53.39 215 145 191 267 179 190Chicken Trib 1 Reach 20.70 69 42 60 85 90 68Magnolia Trib Reach 20.33 40 23 34 49 52 39Critcher Trib Reach 10.02 5 2 4 6 6 6Critcher Trib Reach 20.03 7 4 6 9 9 10Critcher Trib Reach 30.07 13 7 11 16 16 16Critcher Trib Reach 40.17 25 14 21 31 32 27Critcher Trib A0.09 16 9 14 20 21 20Critcher Trib C0.00 2 1 1 2 2 2Critcher Trib D0.01 2 1 2 3 3 4Antioch Trib Reach 20.02 4 2 4 5 6 6Antioch Trib Reach 30.07 13 7 11 16 16 16Antioch Trib Reach 40.11 18 10 15 23 24 22Antioch Trib A Reach 20.03 7 4 6 9 9 10Antioch Trib B Reach 20.04 8 4 7 10 10 11Robin Hill Trib Reach 10.03 6 3 5 8 9 9Robin Hill Trib Reach 20.04 8 4 7 10 11 11Robin Hill Trib A 0.01 2 1 2 3 3 3Robin Hill Trib B0.01 2 1 2 2 3 3Ironwood Trib Reach 10.03 6 3 5 8 9 9Oak Trib0.04 8 4 7 10 11 11Timber Trib Reach 20.08 14 7 12 17 19 17Shew Ridge Trib Reach 20.11 18 10 15 22 24 21Discharge Analysis
Name DA (sq.mi.) Q (cfs)Surveyed Gage Sitesy = 89.039x0.7223R² = 0.9069y = 85.019x0.6093R² = 0.8861y = 55.699x0.7855R² = 0.993111010010000.01 0.1 1 10 100Discharge (cfs)Drainage Area (square miles)North Carolina Piedmont Regional Curve: Bankfull DischargeRural DataRural Upper 95% LimitRural Lower 95% LimitSelect Reference Reaches for CurveUSGS Rural Piedmont Calculator 1.2-yr PredictionsUSGS Rural Piedmont Calculator 1.5-yr PredictionsSurveyed Project Reaches (Manning's Eqn.)Design DischargesAlan Walker CurvePower (Rural Data)Power (Select Reference Reaches for Curve)Power (Alan Walker Curve)
Sediment Transport Capacity and Competency Existing Bankful Shear Stress, t (lb./sq.ft.) Existing Stream Power (watts/sq. meter) Dbkf (ft.) Schan (ft./ft.) Bankfull Shear Stress, t (lb./sq. ft.) Dmax Bar/Subpavement (mm) Moveable particle size (mm) Predicted Shear Stress to move Dmax Stream Power (watts/sq. meter)SF Fishing Creek Reach 20.3 12.81.50 0.0064 0.6 12.7 100.0 0.0 31.3SF Fishing Creek Reach 30.5 31.21.50 0.0082 0.7 25.4 120.0 0.1 45.4SF Fishing Creek Reach 50.4 22.31.60 0.0055 0.5 50.8 95.8 0.2 28.8SF Fishing Creek Reach 6N/A N/A1.90 0.0038 0.4 N/A 82.2 N/A 21.5SF Fishing Creek Reach 7N/A N/A1.90 0.0040 0.5 N/A 85.4 N/A 23.3SF Fishing Creek Reach 8N/A N/A1.90 0.0040 0.5 N/A 85.4 N/A 23.3SF Fishing Creek Reach 100.4 15.82.10 0.0025 0.3 50.8 65.3 0.2 13.8SF Fishing Creek Reach 110.4 24.82.60 0.0025 0.4 76.2 75.9 0.4 19.3WF Fishing Creek Reach 1N/A N/A2.30 0.0020 0.3 N/A 58.7 N/A 11.2WF Fishing Creek Reach 20.3 10.22.00 0.0044 0.5 76.2 94.9 0.4 29.2WF Fishing Creek Reach 3N/A N/A2.00 0.0040 0.5 N/A 88.1 N/A 25.0WF Fishing Creek Reach 40.4 21.82.00 0.0040 0.5 50.8 88.1 0.2 25.0WF Fishing Creek Reach 50.5 24.02.00 0.0045 0.5 72.6 95.8 0.4 29.5Chicken Trib 1 Reach 20.6 31.71.20 0.0088 0.6 50.8 107.2 0.2 34.4Magnolia Trib Reach 20.9 57.10.90 0.0134 0.7 50.8 118.4 0.2 36.3Critcher Trib Reach 1N/A N/A0.40 0.0400 1.0 N/A 148.4 N/A 45.1Critcher Trib Reach 2N/A N/A0.50 0.0270 0.8 N/A 127.8 N/A 37.9Critcher Trib Reach 30.7 50.10.60 0.0254 0.9 50.8 143.1 0.2 42.9Critcher Trib Reach 40.5 34.30.90 0.0092 0.5 76.2 91.9 0.4 19.8Critcher Trib A0.5 25.70.60 0.0200 0.8 25.4 124.8 0.1 39.0Critcher Trib C0.7 29.90.30 0.0200 0.3 N/A 65.9 N/A 11.7Critcher Trib D1.4 87.10.30 0.0482 1.0 N/A 146.4 N/A 41.5Antioch Trib Reach 2N/A N/A0.40 0.0339 0.8 N/A 133.4 N/A 35.4Antioch Trib Reach 30.5 22.90.60 0.0300 1.1 50.8 164.5 0.2 58.3Antioch Trib Reach 40.6 31.00.70 0.0175 0.8 50.8 126.1 0.2 35.0Antioch Trib A Reach 20.7 37.90.50 0.0264 0.9 N/A 135.6 N/A 34.9Antioch Trib B Reach 20.6 27.40.60 0.0180 0.4 12.7 77.5 0.0 15.7Robin Hill Trib Reach 10.8 47.70.50 0.0415 1.2 16.0 171.8 0.1 61.9Robin Hill Trib Reach 20.6 35.60.50 0.0168 0.5 16.0 97.2 0.1 22.2Robin Hill Trib A 1.8 134.10.30 0.0947 1.7 50.8 220.9 0.2 84.7Robin Hill Trib B1.4 85.20.30 0.0763 1.2 50.8 176.9 0.2 55.5Ironwood Trib Reach 10.6 30.90.50 0.0400 1.1 50.8 165.2 0.2 50.5Oak Trib0.6 31.00.50 0.0333 1.1 50.8 158.2 0.2 53.8Timber Trib Reach 20.5 18.50.60 0.0180 0.7 12.7 114.3 0.0 31.6Shew Ridge Trib Reach 20.4 16.00.70 0.0150 0.6 12.7 106.2 0.0 30.4Existing Conditions Proposed Conditions Stream Reach

APPENDIX 7
Photograph Log

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Photograph Log Page 1

Photo 1 – South Fork Fishing Creek. Photo 2 – Critcher Tributary (mid-reach)
Photo 3 – Upper intermittent section of Critcher Tributary. Photo 4 – Critcher Trib A.
Photo 5 – Critcher Trib C. Photo 6 – Antioch Tributary (mid-reach).

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Photograph Log Page 2

Photo 7 – Upper intermittent section of Antioch Tributary. Photo 8 – Antioch Trib A.
Photo 9 – Antioch Trib B. Photo 10 – Antioch Trib C.
Photo 11 – Chicken Trib 1 Photo 12 – Chicken Trib 1A

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Photograph Log Page 3

Photo 13 – Chicken Trib 2 Photo 14 – Robin Hill Trib
Photo 15 – Robin Hill Trib A Photo 16 – Robin Hill Trib B
Photo 17 – Magnolia Trib Photo 18 – Shew Ridge Trib

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Photograph Log Page 4

Photo 19 – Shew Ridge Trib A Photo 20 – Timber Trib
Photo 21 – Ironwood Trib perennial majority. Photo 22 – Ironwood Trib upper intermittent section.
Photo 23 – Oak Trib. Photo 24 – Boundary Trib.

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Photograph Log Page 5

Photo 25 – Wetland A Photo 26 – Wetland D
Photo 27 – Wetland E Photo 28 – Wetland F
Photo 29 – Wetland I Photo 30 – Wetland M

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Photograph Log Page 6

Photo 31 – Wetland O Photo 32 – Wetland P
Photo 33 – Wetland R Photo 34 – Wetland T
Photo 35 – Wetland V Photo 36 – Wetland W

Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Photograph Log Page 7

Photo 36 – Cattle access to Antioch Trib B Photo 37 - Cows at Antioch Trib B
Photo 38 – Cows at Antioch Trib B Photo 39 – Cows at Antioch Trib B

APPENDIX 8
Financial Assurance Letter from UP2Save

APPENDIX 9
Preliminary Plans
Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin 03040101
Wilkes County, North Carolina
Title Sheet 0.1
Project Overview 0.2
General Notes and Symbols 0.3
Typical Sections 1.1-1.26
Plan Sheets
South Fork Fishing Creek 2.1.1-2.1.18
Critcher Tributary 2.2.1-2.2.5
Critcher Trib A 2.2.6-2.2.7
Critcher Trib C 2.2.8
Critcher Trib D 2.2.9
Antioch Tributary 2.3.1-2.3.4
Antioch Trib A 2.3.5-2.3.6
Antioch Trib A1 2.3.7
Antioch Trib B 2.3.8-2.3.9
Antioch Trib B1 2.3.10
Antioch Trib C 2.3.11
Chicken Tributary 1 2.4.1-2.4.4
Chicken Trib 1A 2.4.5-2.4.7
Robin Hill Tributary 2.5.1-2.5.3
Robin Hill Trib A 2.5.4
Robin Hill Trib B 2.5.5
Oak Tributary 2.6.1-2.6.2
West Fork Fishing Creek 2.7.1-2.7.7
Magnolia Tributary 2.8.1
Shew Ridge Tributary 2.9.1
Ironwood Tributary 2.10.1-2.10.2
Timber Tributary 2.11.1-2.11.2
BMP Grading Not Shown
Planting 4.1-4.8
Erosion and Sediment Control Not shown
Details 6.1-6.10
Vicinity Map
Not to Scale
BEFORE YOU DIG!
IT'S THE LAW!
CALL 1-800-632-4949N.C. ONE-CALL CENTER
Sheet Index
Project Directory
N
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY PLANS FOR
IRT MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW
ISSUED DECEMBER 12, 2018
Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Cover.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaTitle Sheet005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR0.1December 12, 2018Engineering:
704-332-7754
Wildlands Engineering, Inc
License No. F-0831
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Emily G. Reinicker, PE
Survey:
Kee Mapping and Surveying, PA
88 Central Avenue
Asheville, NC 28801
Brad Kee, PLS
828-575-9021
Yadkin Valley Umbrella Mitigation Bank -
NC421
Speedway R
dAnt
ioch
Church
RdRobin Hill RdN. Lonnie Oakley RdWi
n
d
y

G
a
p

R
dHenry's Country RdOld H
o
m
est
e
a
d
R
d
SITE
Stream Origins
USACE Action ID No. 2017-01913
USACE Project Manager: Steve Kichefski
STREAM LATITUDE LONGITUDE
South Fork Fishing Creek N36° 09' 23.44" W81° 01' 51.56"
Critcher Tributary N36° 09' 41.70"W81° 01' 35.69"
Critcher Trib A N36° 09' 29.26"W81° 01' 43.56"
Critcher Trib C N36° 09' 39.63"W81° 01' 39.91"
Critcher Trib D N36° 09' 41.89"W81° 01' 37.21"
Antioch Tributary N36° 09' 53.37"W81° 01' 37.50"
Antioch Trib A N36° 09' 54.20"W81° 01' 37.52"
Antioch Trib B N36° 09' 47.98"W81° 01' 43.24"
Antioch Trib C N36° 09' 52.17"W81° 01' 46.33"
Chicken Tributary 1 N36° 09' 28.35"W81° 02' 12.00"
Chicken Trib 1A N36° 09' 31.01"W81° 02' 25.26"
Robin Hill Tributary N36° 09' 43.22"W81° 02' 27.25"
Robin Hill Trib A N36° 09' 48.38"W81° 02' 23.06"
Robin Hill Trib B N36° 09' 43.56"W81° 02' 29.79"
Oak Tributary N36° 09' 57.12"W81° 02' 14.17"
West Fork Fishing Creek N36° 09' 52.68"W81° 02' 49.08"
Magnolia Tributary N36° 09' 42.86"W81° 02' 46.32"
Shew Ridge Tributary N36° 10' 03.91"W81° 02' 58.59"
Ironwood Tributary N36° 09' 52.26"W81° 02' 36.80"
Timber Tributary N36° 10' 17.12"W81° 02' 46.87"
0'300'600'900'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Overview.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaProject Overview005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR0.2December 12, 2018N
OHE
OHEOHE OHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUECEC
E
CECECECECECECECECECECECEC
E
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CECECE
CECEC
E
CE CE CE
C
E CECECECECECECECECECECECECEC
E
C
E
CEC
E
CECECEC
E
CE CE CE CECECECECE
CECECECEC
E
C
E
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECECECEC
E
C
E
CE CE
CE
CE CECE CECECECE CECECECECE
CE
CE CECECECE
CECECECE CE CE
CEC
E
CECECECECECECECEC
E
CECEC
E
C
E
CE
C
E
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECEC
E
CECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CECECECE
CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
ANTIOCH CHURCH RDROBIN HILL RDSPEEDWAY RD
ANGIE SALE
PIN: 3898-78-0049
DB: 1232 PG 174
SALE LAND AND TIMBER, LLC
DB: 1022 PG: 50, DB: 1029 PG: 11,
& DB: 1236 PG: 382 & 383
PB: 9 PG: 169 & 170
PB: 11 PG: 545 & 546
ANTIOCH BAPTIST CHURCH
OF WILKES, INC.
PIN: 4808-15-3590, 4808-15-5113
& 4808-15-2795
DB: 1000 PG: 388
BOBBY L. SHEW,
PATRICIA SHEW,
& BRYCE F. SHEW
PIN: 4808-25-9513
DB: 731 PG: 740
BOBBY L. SHEW & WIFE
PATRICIA SHEW
PIN: 4808-15-9086
DB: 360 PG: 181 & DB:
510 PG: 257
REX W. INSCORE & WIFE
BARBARA C. INSCORE
PIN: 4808-24-6167
DB: 512 PG: 483
ROBIN M. STANLEY & HUSBAND
ROCKY D. STANLEY
PIN: 4808-13-7147
DB: 1259 PG: 396
DONALD T. INSCORE & WIFE
KATIE M. INSCORE
PIN: 4808-21-3763
DB: 1120 PG: 5
GERALDINE B. MCCARTER
PIN: 4808-11-2681
DB: 846 PG: 142 &
DB: 1241 PG: 431
BILLY MATHIS
PIN: 3898-91-7528
DB: 370 PG: 80
MICHAEL B. WILLIAMS & WIFE
DIANE H. WILLIAMS
PIN: 3898-92-1067
DB: 729 PG: 812
JAMES M. WILLIAMS
PIN: 3898-82-5368
DB: 957 PG: 238
MICHAEL B. WILLIAMS
& WIFE
DIANE H. WILLIAMS
PIN: 3898-81-0983
DB: 912 PG: 314
MICHAEL B. WILLIAMS
& WIFE
DIANE H. WILLIAMS
PIN: 3898-72-9202
DB: 649 PG: 751MICHAEL B. WILLIAMS
& WIFE
DIANE H. WILLIAMS
PIN: 3898-71-4974
DB: 1058 PG: 19
TROY C. PERRY & WIFE
DIANA H. PERRY
PIN: 3898-61-4638
DB: 1202 PG: 161
TROY PERRY & WIFE
DIANA PERRY
PIN: 3898-62-4737
DB: 1204 PG: 208
SHERRY S. WILCOX, RACHEL S. CARTER,
& TONYA S. TEAGUE
PIN: 3898-63-9668
DB: 1265 PG: 130
ALAN K. ANDERSON
PIN: 3898-74-0033
DB: 699 PG: 488
REF.: DB: 416 PG: 206,
TRACT NUMBER 7
ALAN K. ANDERSON
PIN: 3898-63-7965
DB: 1193 PG: 435
TOMMY W. SHEW & WIFE
LINDA S. SHEW
PIN: 3898-52-1419
DB: 516 PG: 926
SALE LAND AND TIMBER, LLC
PIN: 3898-43-2762
DB: 1029 PG: 4
RALPH U. ANDERSON & WIFE
VIRGINIA L. ANDERSON (LIFE ESTATE)
REGINA L. ANDERSON
PIN: 3898-54-2986
DB: 1201 PG: 75
RAYMOND T. NANCE & WIFE
TRISHIA M. NANCE
PIN: 3898-45-8733
DB: 1079 PG: 129
ARDEL B. BOWLIN & WIFE
SHIRLEY A. BOWLIN
PIN: 3898-46-4739
DB: 751 PG: 437
JOHN E. COTHREN &
WIFE
DORA C. COTHREN
PIN: 3898-87-9237
DB: 695 PG: 726
JEFFREY B. KELLER &
JASON B. KELLER
PIN: 3898-96-0111
DB: 1124 PG: 124,
PARCEL THREE
RALPH T. SPARKS, JR.
PIN: 4808-06-1862
DB: 1016 PG: 105
CHERIE R. TRIPLETT
PIN: 4808-16-1032
DB: 1164 PG: 6
REFEFENCE: DB: 1044 PG: 42,
DB: 272 PG: 142 & DB: 142 PG: 617
CRITCHER BROTHERS
PRODUCE, INC.
PIN: 3898-75-5006
DB: 835 PG: 86
CRITCHER BROTHERS
PRODUCE, INC.
PIN: 3898-75-5006
DB: 835 PG: 86
CRITCHER BROTHERS
PRODUCE, INC.
PIN: 3898-75-5006
DB: 835 PG: 86
CRITCHER BROTHERS
PRODUCE, INC.
PIN: 3898-75-5006
DB: 835 PG: 86
CRITCHER BROTHERS
PRODUCE, INC.
PIN: 3898-75-5006
DB: 835 PG: 86
JEFFREY B. KELLER &
JASON B. KELLER
PIN: 3898-95-2202
DB: 1124 PG: 124,
PARCEL ONE
JEFFREY B. KELLER &
JASON B. KELLER
PIN: 4808-05-1674
DB: 1124 PG: 124,
PARCEL TWO
2.1
.12.1.22.1.32.
1
.
4
2
.
1
.
52.1.62.1.
7
2.1.8
2.1.9
2.
1
.
1
02.1
.112.1.122.1
.13
2
.
1
.
1
4
2.
1
.
1
52.1.162.1.172.1.182.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.2
.
5
2.2.62.2
.7
2
.
2
.
8 2.2.92.2.1Critc
h
er
Tri
b
ut
ar
ySF F
i
sh
ing
C
reek
Antioc
h
Tri
b
ut
ary
Chicken Tributary 1Chick
e
n
Tri
b
1
A
Crit
c
h
e
r

T
r
i
b

AAntioch Trib AAntioch Trib B
Robin Hill TributaryOak Tri
b
ut
ar
y
WF Fishing Creek
Magnolia TributaryIr
o
n
w
o
o
d

T
r
i
b
u
t
a
r
y
S
h
e
w

T
r
i
b
u
t
a
r
y Timbe
r
T
r
ibu
ta
ry
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.42.3.52.3.62.3.82.3.92.3.12.3.11
2.4.12.4.22.4.32.4.42.4.52.4.6
2.4.7
2.5.5 2.5.12.5.22.5.32.5.
4
2.6.1
2.6.2
2.7.12.8.12.7.22.7.3
2.7.4 2.7.52.7.6 2.7.7
2.9.
1 2.11
.12.11
.2
2.
1
0
.
12.10.2BRANDON S. STOKES & WIFE
LISA M. STOKES
PIN: 4808-23-1417
DB: 822 PG: 369
Antioch
Trib CSF Fishing Creek2.3.7
2.
3
.
1
0
EXISTING BARN
TO REMAIN
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Cover.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaGeneral Notes and Symbols005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR0.3December 12, 2018Existing Thalweg
Existing Property Line
Existing Major Contour
Existing Minor Contour
Existing Overhead Utility Easement
Existing Overhead Electric
Existing Power Pole
Existing Temporary Construction Easement
Existing Fence
Existing Storm Pipe
Existing Farm Road
Existing Wetland
Existing Tree
Existing Spring Head
Existing Bedrock
Existing Asphalt Road
Existing Debris Pile
Existing Treeline
Proposed Thalweg Alignment
Proposed Bankfull
Proposed Conservation Easement
Proposed Internal Crossing
Proposed Major Contour
Proposed Minor Contour
Proposed Safety Fence
Proposed Silt Fence
Proposed Limits of Disturbance
Proposed Fencing
Proposed Cattle Guard
Proposed Safety/Wetland Protection Fence
Proposed Permanent Culvert Crossing
See Detail 3, Sheet 6.8
Proposed Permanent Ford Crossing
See Detail 4, Sheet 6.8
Proposed Log Sill
See Detail 2, Sheet 6.2
Proposed Cover Log
See Detail 4, Sheet 6.6
Proposed Log J-Hook
See Detail 3, Sheet 6.2
Proposed Boulder J-Hook
See Detail 3, Sheet 6.3
Proposed Boulder J-Hook with Sill
See Detail 1, Sheet 6.4
Proposed Log Vane
See Detail 1, Sheet 6.3
Proposed Rock Vane
See Detail 2, Sheet 6.4
Proposed Rock Sill
See Detail 2, Sheet 6.3
Proposed Boulder Toe
See Detail 4, Sheet 6.2
10+00
OHE
TCE TCE TCE
100
100
PROJECT NOTES:
1.Topographic data provided by North Carolina Spatial Data Download.
QL2 Lidar data from September 2016.
2.Lidar data supplemented by topographic survey provided by Kee
Mapping and Surveying dated May 2018.
3.Property Net survey provided by Kee Mapping and Surveying dated
October 2018.
4.Riffle selection will be varied based on available materials at the
Engineers' discretion. Field coordination will be required.XXExisting Features Proposed Features
Proposed Various Constructed Riffles Per Plans
See Sheets 6.1 - 6.2
Proposed Brush Toe
See Detail 1-2, Sheet 6.9
Proposed BMP/SPSC
Proposed Brush Mats
See Detail 4, Sheet 6.3
Proposed Channel Stabilization
See Detail 4, Sheet 6.2
Proposed Stabilized BMP Inlet/Outlet
See Details 1 & 2, Sheet 6.10
Proposed Structures
SAF
[x][x]
CE CE CE
LOD LOD
CE-XS CE-XS
SAF SAF
F
OUE OUE
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Typical.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaSouth Fork Fishing Creek Reach 2, 3Typical Sections005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR1.1December 12, 2018SF Fishing Creek Reach 2 -Riffle
STA: 106+46 - 114+75,
SF Fishing Creek Reach 3 -Riffle
STA: 114+75 - 123+29
SF Fishing Creek Reach 2 -Pool
STA: 106+46 - 114+75,
SF Fishing Creek Reach 3 -Pool
STA: 114+75 - 123+29
2.2'PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2.5:
1 2.5:1
1.8'
4.5'4.9'4.9'4.5'
18.8'
VARIES
2.6'-5.8'
PROPOSED GRADE
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 M
A
X4:1
PROPOSED BANKFULL
1:1 MAX1
:
1
M
A
X
2.0'
3"-6" BERM TO BE BUILT ON DOWNSTREAM
THIRD OF MEANDER BENDS.
BERM SHALL HAVE 2.5" 1 SIDE SLOPES WITH 2FT TOP WIDTH.
23.0'
8.0'11.0'4.0'
2.0'
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Typical.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaSouth Fork Fishing Creek Reach 5Typical Sections005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR1.2December 12, 2018SF Fishing Creek Reach 5 -Pool
STA:127+45 - 139+02
SF Fishing Creek Reach 5 -Riffle
STA: 127+45 - 139+02
2.0'2.4'
5.0'5.3'5.3'5.0'
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANSTIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2.5:
1 2.5:1
20.6'
VARIES
2.9'-5.3'
4'
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
4:1 2:1
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
25'
1:
1

M
A
X 1:1 MAX
8'13'
2.0'
3"-6" BERM TO BE BUILT ON DOWNSTREAM
THIRD OF MEANDER BENDS.
BERM SHALL HAVE 2.5" 1 SIDE SLOPES WITH 2FT TOP WIDTH.
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Typical.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaSouth Fork Fishing Creek Reach 6, 7Typical Sections005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR1.3December 12, 2018SF Fishing Creek Reach 6 -Riffle
STA: 139+02 - 144+28
SF Fishing Creek Reach 7 - Riffle
STA: 144+28 - 151+07
SF Fishing Creek Reach 6 -Pool
STA: 139+02 - 144+28
SF Fishing Creek Reach 7 - Pool
STA: 144+28 - 151+07
2.4'
6.0'5.9'5.9'6.0'
2.8'2.5:
1
2.5:1
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANSTIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
23.8'
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
4:1 2:1
29'
VARIES
3.4-7.2'
8'17'4'
1:
1

M
A
X
1:1 MAX
2.0'
3"-6" BERM TO BE BUILT ON DOWNSTREAM
THIRD OF MEANDER BENDS.
BERM SHALL HAVE 2.5" 1 SIDE SLOPES WITH 2FT TOP WIDTH.
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Typical.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaSouth Fork Fishing Creek Reach 8, 10, 11Typical Sections005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR1.4December 12, 2018SF Fishing Creek Reach 8 -Riffle
STA: 151+07 - 159+26
SF Fishing Reach 10 - Riffle
STA: 165+14 - 168+60
SF Fishing Creek Reach 11 -Riffle
STA:168+60 - 179+52
SF Fishing Creek Reach 8 -Pool
STA: 151+07 - 159+26
SF Fishing Reach 10 - Pool
STA: 165+14 - 168+60
SF Fishing Creek Reach 11 -Pool
STA:168+60 - 179+52
3.2'
3.6'
8.0'7.5'7.5'8.0'
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2.5:1
2.5:
1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
31'
VARIES
4.3'-8.5'
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
4:1 2:1
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
38'
8'26'4'
1
:
1
M
A
X
1:1 MAX
2.0'
3"-6" BERM TO BE BUILT ON DOWNSTREAM
THIRD OF MEANDER BENDS.
BERM SHALL HAVE 2.5" 1 SIDE SLOPES
WITH 2FT TOP WIDTH.
2.0'
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Typical.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaCritcher Tributary Reach 1Typical Sections005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR1.5December 12, 2018Critcher Tributary Reach 1 -Pool
STA:200+00 - 202+07
Critcher Tributary Reach 1 -Riffle
STA: 200+00 - 202+07
1.5'
0.7'2.5:
1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
2.5:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
1.5'
6'
1.5'
0.6'
1.5'
VARIES
0.9'-2.3'
2:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL2:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
1'5.2'1'
7.2'
1:
1

M
A
X
1:1 M
A
X
0.5'
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Typical.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaCritcher Tributary Reach 2Typical Sections005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR1.6December 12, 2018Critcher Tributary Reach 2 -Pool
STA:202+07 - 204+73
Critcher Tributary Reach 2 -Riffle
STA: 202+07 - 204+73
1.8'1.3'
2.5:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
2.5:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
3.1'
6.1'
0.8'0.7'
2:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL2:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
VARIES
0.9'-3.2'1:1 MAX1
:
1
M
A
X
5.40'1'
7.40'
1'
0.5'
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Typical.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaCritcher Tributary Reach 3Typical Sections005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR1.7December 12, 2018Critcher Tributary Reach 3 -Pool
STA:204+73 - 216+28
Critcher Tributary Reach 3 -Riffle
STA: 204+73 - 216+28
2.7'1.5'
3:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
3:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2.7'
8.3'
1.5'
1.0'0.9'
1'
VARIES
1.2'-4.5'
2:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL2:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
1'
10'1:1 MAX1
:
1
M
A
X
8'
0.5'
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Typical.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaCritcher Tributary Reach 4Typical Sections005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR1.8December 12, 2018Critcher Tributary Reach 4 -Pool
STA:216+28 - 220+61
Critcher Tributary Reach 4 -Riffle
STA: 216+28 - 220+61
2.5:
1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
2.5:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
1.4'1.5'
11.4'
3.5'2.2'2.2'3.5'
2'
4:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL2:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
1'
13.5'1:1 MAX1:
1
M
A
X
10.5'
VARIES
1.8' - 4.0'
0.5'
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Typical.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaCritcher Trib ATypical Sections005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR1.9December 12, 2018Critcher Tributary A -Pool
STA:240+00 - 248+42
Critcher Tributary A -Riffle
STA: 240+00 - 248+42
0.9'1.0'
2.7'1.8'
3:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
3:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2.7'
9.0'
1.8'
1'
2:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
2:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
10.8'
1'
VARIES
1.2'-3.5'
8.8'
0.50'
1:
1
M
A
X 1:1 MAX
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Typical.dwgDecember 6, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaCritcher Trib C, DTypical Sections005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR1.10December 12, 2018Critcher Tributary C -Pool
STA:270+03 - 271+20,
Critcher Tributary D -Pool
STA: 260+00 - 261+32
Critcher Tributary C -Riffle
STA: 270+03 - 271+20,
Critcher Tributary D-Riffle
STA: 260+00 - 281+32
0.5'2.5:
1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL2.5:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
0.4'
4.0'
1.0'1.0'1.0'1.0'
0.5'
2:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
2:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
5.0'
0.5'
VARIES
0.7'-3.5'
4.0'1:1 MAX1:1
MAX
0.25'
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Typical.dwgDecember 6, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaAntioch Tributary Reach 2Typical Sections005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR1.11December 12, 2018Antioch Tributary Reach 2 -Pool
STA:301+85 - 307+04
Antioch Tributary Reach 2 -Riffle
STA: 301+85 - 307+04
0.6'
2.5:
1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
2.5:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
0.7'
6.0'
1.5'1.5'1.5'1.5'
1.0'
2:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL2:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
7.2'
1.0'5.2'
VARIES
0.9'-2.3'
0.5'
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Typical.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaAntioch Tributary Reach 3Typical Sections005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR1.12December 12, 2018Antioch Tributary Reach 3 -Pool
STA:307+04 - 312+81
Antioch Tributary Reach 3 -Riffle
STA: 307+04 - 312+81
0.9'
2.0'2.0'
2.5:
1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
2.5:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2.0'
8.0'
0.8'
2.0'
1.0'
VARIES
1.1'.-4.2'
1
:
1
MA
X
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
2:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
1.0'
9.6'1:1 MAX7.6'
2:1 0.5'
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Typical.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaAntioch Tributary Reach 4Typical Sections005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR1.13December 12, 2018Antioch Tributary Reach 4 -Pool
STA:312+81 - 316+85
Antioch Tributary Reach 4 -Riffle
STA: 312+81 - 316+85
2.5'2.3'
2.5:
1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
2.5:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2.5'
1.2'
9.6'
1.0'
2.3'
VARIES
1.5'-4.5'
2:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL2:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2.0'
11.5'
2.0'7.5'
1.0'1:1 MAX1
:
1
M
A
X
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Typical.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaAntioch Trib A Reach 2Typical Sections005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR1.14December 12, 2018Antioch Tributary A Reach 2 -Pool
STA:332+30 - 333+91
Antioch Tributary A Reach 2 -Riffle
STA: 332+30 - 333+91
2.1'1.4'
3:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL3:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2.1'
0.8'
7.0'
1.4'
0.7'
VARIES
1.2'-3.7'
2:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL2:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
1.0'1.0'
8.4'
6.4'1:1 MAX1
:
1
MA
X
0.5'
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Typical.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaAntioch Trib B Reach 2Typical Sections005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR1.15December 12, 2018Antioch Tributary B Reach 2 -Pool
STA:354+49 - 358+38
Antioch Tributary B Reach 2 -Riffle
STA: 354+49 - 358+38
0.8'
2.0'2.0'
2.5:
1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
2.5:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS2.0'
0.9'
8.0'
2.0'
1.0'
VARIES
1.1'.-4.2'
1
:
1
MA
X
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
2:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
1.0'
9.6'1:1 MAX7.6'
2:1 0.5'
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Typical.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaChicken Tributary 1 Reach 2Typical Sections005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR1.16December 12, 2018Chicken Tributary 1 Reach 2 -Pool
STA:407+60 - 415+56
Chicken Tributary 1 Reach 2 -Riffle
STA: 407+60 - 415+56
2.0'
4.0'3.6'
2.5:
1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
2.5:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS4.0'
1.6'
15.2'
3.6'
VARIES
2.4'-5.0'
4:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL2:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2.0'4.0'
18.2'
12.2'1:1 MAX
1:
1
M
A
X
1.0'
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Typical.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaRobin Hill Tributary Reach 1Typical Sections005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR1.17December 12, 2018Robin Hill Tributary Reach 1 -Pool
STA:500+79 - 507+84
Robin Hill Tributary Reach 1 -Riffle
STA:500+79 - 507+84
0.6'
1.5'1.5'
2.5:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
2.5:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
1.5'
0.7'
6.0'
1.5'
VARIES
0.9'-3.0'
2:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL2:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
1.0'
7.2'
1.0'5.2'1:1 MAX1:1
MAX
0.5'
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Typical.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaRobin Hill Tributary Reach 2Typical Sections005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR1.18December 12, 2018Robin Hill Tributary Reach 2 -Pool
STA:507+84 - 512+35
Robin Hill Tributary Reach 2 -Riffle
STA: 507+84 - 512+35
0.8'
2.4'1.3'
3:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
3:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS2.4'
0.9'
1.3'
7.4'
VARIES
1.2'-3.5'
4:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED BANKFULL2:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2.0'
8.9'
1.0'5.9'1:1 MAX1:1 MAX
PROPOSED GRADE
0.5'
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Typical.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaRobin Hill Trib A Reach 1, Trib B Reach 1Typical Sections005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR1.19December 12, 2018Robin Hill Tributary A Reach 1 -Pool
STA:500+66 - 502+17,
Robin Hill Tributary B Reach 1 -Pool
STA: 575+93 - 578+28
Robin Hill Tributary A Reach 1 -Riffle
STA: 500+66 - 502+17,
Robin Hill Tributary B Reach 1 -Riffle
STA: 575+93 - 578+28
0.5'
1.5'0.5'
3:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL3:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
1.5'
3.50'
2:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
2:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
1.8'
3.6'
1.8'
VARIES
0.8'-1.8'1:1 MAX
1:
1
M
A
X
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Typical.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaOak Tributary Reach 1Typical Sections005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR1.20December 12, 2018Oak Tributary Reach 1 -Pool
STA:600+71 - 606+54
Oak Tributary Reach 1 -Riffle
STA: 600+71 - 606+54
1.0'
2.0'2.0'
2.5:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
2.5:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS2.0'
0.8'
8.0'
2.0'
VARIES
1.5-4.0'
2:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
2:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
1.0'
9.0'
1.0'7.0'1:1 MAX1
:
1
M
A
X
0.5'
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Typical.dwgDecember 6, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaWest Fork Fishing Creek Reach 1 & 2Typical Sections005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR1.21December 12, 2018WF Fishing Creek Reach 1 -Pool
STA:701+62 - 708+82,
WF Fishing Creek Reach 2 -Pool
STA: 708+82 - 711+66
WF Fishing Creek Reach 1 -Riffle
STA: 701+62 - 708+82,
WF Fishing Creek Reach 2 -Riffle
STA: 708+82 - 711+66
3.5'PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2.5:
1
2.5:1
3'
7.5'6.0'6.0'7.5'
27.0'
VARIES
4.2'-7.0'
PROPOSED THALWEG
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1
4:1
8.0'4.0'
32.0'
20.0'
1:
1
M
A
X 1:1 MAX
PROPOSED GRADE
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED BANKFULL
3"-6" BERM TO BE BUILT ON DOWNSTREAM
THIRD OF MEANDER BENDS.
BERM SHALL HAVE 2.5" 1 SIDE SLOPES WITH
2FT TOP WIDTH.
2.0'2.0'
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Typical.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaWF Fishing Creek Reach 3, 4, 5Typical Sections005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR1.22December 12, 2018WF Fishing Creek Reach 3 -Riffle
STA: 711+66 - 717+62
WF Fishing Creek Reach 4 -Riffle
STA:717+62 - 724+76
WF Fishing Creek Reach 5 -Riffle
STA:724+76 - 731+71
WF Fishing Creek Reach 3 -Pool
STA: 711+66 - 717+62
WF Fishing Creek Reach 4 -Pool
STA:717+62 - 724+76
WF Fishing Creek Reach 5 -Pool
STA:724+76 - 731+71
2.9'
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2.5:
1
2.5:1
2.7'
6.75'6.25'6.75'6.25'
26.0'
VARIES
3.5'-6.0'PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED THALWEG
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1
4:1
8.0'4.0'
32.0'
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED BANKFULL
3"-6" BERM TO BE BUILT ON DOWNSTREAM
THIRD OF MEANDER BENDS.
BERM SHALL HAVE 2.5" 1 SIDE SLOPES WITH
2FT TOP WIDTH.20.0'
2.0'2.0'
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Typical.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaMagnolia Tributary Reach 2Typical Sections005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR1.23December 12, 2018Magnolia Tributary Reach 2 -Pool
STA:811+51 - 815+95
Magnolia Tributary Reach 2 -Riffle
STA: 811+51 - 815+95
1.2'
3.0'2.8'
2.5:
1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
2.5:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
3.0'
1.4'
11.6'
2.8'
VARIES
1.7'-4.2'
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
2.0'
2:14:1
1.0'
14.0'
11.0'
1:
1
M
A
X 1:1 MAXTIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED BANKFULL
0.5'
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Typical.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaShew Ridge Tributary Reach 2Typical Sections005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR1.24December 12, 2018Shew Ridge Tributary Reach 2 -Pool
STA:910+34 - 913+44
Shew Ridge Tributary Reach 2 -Riffle
STA: 910+34 - 913+44
0.9'
2.7'2.0'
3:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
3:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2.0'
1.0'
2.7'
9.4'
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2.0'
2:14:1
1.0'
10.8'
VARIES
1.5'-4.2'
7.8'1:1 MAX1:1 MAX0.5'
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Typical.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaIronwood Tributary Reach 1Typical Sections005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR1.25December 12, 2018Ironwood Tributary Reach 1 -Pool
STA:1001+94 - 1007+16
Ironwood Tributary Reach 1 -Riffle
STA: 1001+94 - 1007+16
0.7'
2.1'1.0'
3:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL3:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
1.0'2.1'
6.2'
0.8'
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
1.0'
2:12:1
1.0'
7.5'
VARIES
1.0'-3.2'
5.5'
1:
1
M
A
X 1:1 MAX
0.5'
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Typical.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaTimber Tributary Reach 2Typical Sections005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR1.26December 12, 2018Timber Tributary Reach 2 -Pool
STA:1113+77 - 1122+58
Timber Tributary Reach 2 -Riffle
STA: 1113+77 - 1122+58
0.9'
2.7'1.7'
3:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
3:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS1.7'
1.0'
2.7'
8.8'
1.2'-4.0'
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2.0'
2:14:1
1.0'7.5'
10.5'
1:
1
M
A
X 1:1 MAX
0.5'
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles SF.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaSouth Fork Fishing CreekStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.1.1December 12, 2018N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
Sheet Index
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.1.5
2.1.6
2.1.72.1.8
2.1.10
2.1.11
2.1.12
2.1.13
2.1.14
2.1.15
2.1.16
2.1.17
2.1.18
2.1.1
2.1.9SF FISHING
CREEKCHICKENTRIBUTARYCRIT
C
H
E
R
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
ANTI
O
C
H
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
ENHANCEMENT II REACH TREATMENTS:
1.EXCLUDE CATTLE
2.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION
3.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEE
PLANTING PLANS
1025
1030
1035
1040
1045
1025
1030
1035
1040
1045
100+00 100+50 101+00 101+50 102+00 102+50 103+00 103+50 104+00 104+20
EXISTING GROUND
X X XXXXXX
X
X
X
X
X
XXXX CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
SF FISHING CREEK
REMOVE EXISTING FENCE
IN CONSERVATION EASEMENT.
100+00
101+00
102+00
103+00
104+00
STA: 100+49
SF FISHING CREEK
BEGIN REACH 1 - ENHANCEMENT II MATCH LINE - STA 104+20
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles SF.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaSouth Fork Fishing CreekStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.1.2December 12, 2018Sheet Index N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.1.5
2.1.6
2.1.72.1.8
2.1.10
2.1.11
2.1.12
2.1.13
2.1.14
2.1.15
2.1.16
2.1.17
2.1.18
2.1.1
2.1.9SF FISHING
CREEKCHICKENTRIBUTARYCRIT
C
H
E
R
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
ANTI
O
C
H
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
ENHANCEMENT II REACH TREATMENTS:
1.EXCLUDE CATTLE
2.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION
3.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEE
PLANTING PLANS
1020
1025
1030
1035
1020
1025
1030
1035
104+20 104+50 105+00 105+50 106+00 106+50 107+00 107+50 108+00 108+50 108+65
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
STA = 107+40ELEV = 1026.75STA = 107+67ELEV = 1024.36STA = 107+94ELEV = 1024.36STA = 108+21ELEV = 1026.75STA = 108+61ELEV = 1026.55STA = 106+37ELEV = 1027.27-0.5%
-0.5%
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
SAF
SAF
SAF SAF
SAF
SAF
SAF
SF
F
I
S
H
I
N
G

C
R
E
E
K103010
3
0
1030
103
0
1035STA: 106+46
SF FISHING CREEK
END REACH 1 - ENHANCEMENT II
BEGIN REACH 2 - RESTORATION
REMOVE EXISTING FENCE
IN CONSERVATION EASEMENT.
104+00
10
5
+
0
0
106
+
0
0
10
7
+
0
0
108+00109+00
EXISTING BEDROCK
PROTECT EXISTING WETLAND
MATCH LINE - STA 104+20MATCH LINE - STA 108+65
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles SF.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaSouth Fork Fishing CreekStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.1.3December 12, 2018N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
Sheet Index
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.1.5
2.1.6
2.1.72.1.8
2.1.10
2.1.11
2.1.12
2.1.13
2.1.14
2.1.15
2.1.16
2.1.17
2.1.18
2.1.1
2.1.9SF FISHING
CREEKCHICKENTRIBUTARYCRIT
C
H
E
R
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
ANTI
O
C
H
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
1015
1020
1025
1030
1015
1020
1025
1030
108+65 109+00 109+50 110+00 110+50 111+00 111+50 112+00 112+50 113+00
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED BANKFULL
PROPOSED GRADESTA = 108+86ELEV = 1024.42STA = 109+10ELEV = 1024.42STA = 109+34ELEV = 1026.55STA = 109+62ELEV = 1025.79STA = 109+86
ELEV = 1021.81 STA = 110+09ELEV = 1021.81STA = 110+33ELEV = 1025.29STA = 111+09ELEV = 1023.71STA = 111+34ELEV = 1019.90STA = 111+60ELEV = 1019.90STA = 111+85ELEV = 1023.71STA = 112+52ELEV = 1023.20STA = 112+76ELEV = 1019.45STA = 112+99
ELEV = 1019.45
-2.7%
-2.1%
-0.8%XXXXXXXX
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
CECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
SAFSAFSAF
SAF
SAF
SAFSAFSAFSAF
SAF
SAF
SAF
SF FISHING CREEK10301030
10
3
0
1025
10251025 10
2
5
10251025102510251025
CRITCHER TRIBUTARYFILL EXISTING CHANNEL (TYP)
REMOVE EXISTING FENCE
IN CONSERVATION EASEMENT.REMOVE EXISTI
N
G FE
NCE
IN CO
NSERVATI
O
N EASE
ME
NT.108+00109+00
110+00 111+00112+00113+00
114+00
219+00PROTECT EXISTING
WETLAND TO REMAINMATCH LINE - STA 108+65MATCH LINE - STA 113+00
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles SF.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaSouth Fork Fishing CreekStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.1.4December 12, 2018N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
Sheet Index
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.1.5
2.1.6
2.1.72.1.8
2.1.10
2.1.11
2.1.12
2.1.13
2.1.14
2.1.15
2.1.16
2.1.17
2.1.18
2.1.1
2.1.9SF FISHING
CREEKCHICKENTRIBUTARYCRIT
C
H
E
R
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
ANTI
O
C
H
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
1015
1020
1025
1030
1015
1020
1025
1030
113+00 113+50 114+00 114+50 115+00 115+50 116+00 116+50 117+00 117+50
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULLSTA = 113+23ELEV = 1023.20STA = 113+75ELEV = 1022.78STA = 113+95ELEV = 1020.11STA = 114+15ELEV = 1020.11STA = 114+34ELEV = 1022.78STA = 114+68ELEV = 1022.47STA = 114+99ELEV = 1018.78STA = 115+30ELEV = 1018.78STA = 115+60ELEV = 1022.47STA = 116+29ELEV = 1021.88STA = 116+62ELEV = 1018.28STA = 116+96ELEV = 1018.28STA = 117+29ELEV = 1021.88-0.8%
-0.9%
-0.8%XXXXXXXXXX
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CESAF
SF FISHING CREEK102510
2
5
CRITCHER TRIBUTARY1
0
2
0
1
0
2
0
1025
10251025
10251030
103
5
1040
1
0
4
5
10
2
5
102
5
STA: 114+75
SF FISHING CREEK
END REACH 2 - RESTORATION
BEGIN REACH 3 - RESTORATION
EXISTING
CONCRETE
PAD
EXISTING CONCRETE PAD
TO BE REMOVED
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL (TYP)
REMOVE EXISTING FENCE
IN CONSERVATION EASEMENT.
113
+
0
0
114
+
0
0
11
5
+
0
0 116+00117+00
118
+
0
0
221+
1
3
219+00220+0
0
221+
0
0MATCH LINE - STA 113+00MATCH LINE - STA 117+50
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles SF.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaSouth Fork Fishing CreekStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.1.5December 12, 2018N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
Sheet Index
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.1.5
2.1.6
2.1.72.1.8
2.1.10
2.1.11
2.1.12
2.1.13
2.1.14
2.1.15
2.1.16
2.1.17
2.1.18
2.1.1
2.1.9SF FISHING
CREEKCHICKENTRIBUTARYCRIT
C
H
E
R
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
ANTI
O
C
H
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
1015
1020
1025
1030
1015
1020
1025
1030
117+50 118+00 118+50 119+00 119+50 120+00 120+50 121+00 121+50 121+80
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULLSTA = 117+83ELEV = 1021.42STA = 118+12ELEV = 1018.84STA = 118+41ELEV = 1018.84STA = 118+70ELEV = 1021.42STA = 119+18ELEV = 1021.01STA = 119+47ELEV = 1017.42STA = 119+77ELEV = 1017.42STA = 120+06ELEV = 1021.01STA = 120+70ELEV = 1020.42STA = 120+87ELEV = 1017.81STA = 121+04ELEV = 1017.81STA = 121+21ELEV = 1020.42STA = 121+58ELEV = 1019.70-0.9%
-0.9%
-0.9%
-1.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X
X
X
X
X
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CESF FISHING CREEK
10
2
0
10
2
0
1025
1030
1035
1040
104
5
1020102
0
102
5
10
3
0
1035
1040
1045
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL (TYP)
REMOVE EXISTING FENCE
IN CONSERVATION EASEMENT.
117+00
118+00 119+001
2
0
+
0
0
121+00
12
2
+
0
0
MATCH LINE - STA 117+50MATCH LINE - STA 121+80
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles SF.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaSouth Fork Fishing CreekStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.1.6December 12, 2018N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
Sheet Index
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.1.5
2.1.6
2.1.72.1.8
2.1.10
2.1.11
2.1.12
2.1.13
2.1.14
2.1.15
2.1.16
2.1.17
2.1.18
2.1.1
2.1.9SF FISHING
CREEKCHICKENTRIBUTARYCRIT
C
H
E
R
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
ANTI
O
C
H
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
ENHANCEMENT II REACH TREATMENTS:
1.EXCLUDE CATTLE
2.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION
3.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEE
PLANTING PLANS
1005
1010
1015
1020
1025
1005
1010
1015
1020
1025
121+80 122+00 122+50 123+00 123+50 124+00 124+50 125+00 125+50 126+00 126+20
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
STA = 121+82ELEV = 1016.34STA = 122+05ELEV = 1016.34STA = 122+29ELEV = 1019.20STA = 122+74ELEV = 1017.83STA = 122+90
ELEV = 1015.78 STA = 123+06ELEV = 1015.78STA = 123+21ELEV = 1017.33STA = 123+29
ELEV = 1016.94
-3.0%
-5.0
%
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
XXXXX XCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
SF FISHIN
G

C
R
E
E
K
1010
1010
1015
1015
1020
1020
1025
1025
1030
1030
1035
10351040
1040
1045
1045
10201020
1025
1030
1035
10
4
0
104
5
STA: 123+29
SF FISHING CREEK
END REACH 3 - RESTORATION
BEGIN REACH 4 - ENHANCEMENT II
EXISTING

B
E
D
R
O
C
K

S
L
I
D
E
PROTECT EXISTING BRIDGEFILL EXIS
TI
N
G
C
H
A
N
N
EL (
T
Y
P)
122+00
123+00 124+00125+00
126+
0
0 PROTECT EXISTING BARNTO REMAINREMOVE EXISTING 8" CMP
EXISTING FARM ROAD
TO BE DECOMMISSIONED.MATCH LINE - STA 121+80MATCH LINE - STA 126+20
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles SF.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaSouth Fork Fishing CreekStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.1.7December 12, 2018N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
Sheet Index
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.1.5
2.1.6
2.1.72.1.8
2.1.10
2.1.11
2.1.12
2.1.13
2.1.14
2.1.15
2.1.16
2.1.17
2.1.18
2.1.1
2.1.9SF FISHING
CREEKCHICKENTRIBUTARYCRIT
C
H
E
R
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
ANTI
O
C
H
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
1002
1005
1010
1015
1020
1002
1005
1010
1015
1020
126+20 126+50 127+00 127+50 128+00 128+50 129+00 129+50 130+00 130+50
EXISTING GROUND PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULLSTA = 127+94ELEV = 1007.24STA = 128+50ELEV = 1006.96STA = 128+64ELEV = 1004.45STA = 128+79ELEV = 1004.45STA = 129+47ELEV = 1003.71STA = 129+70ELEV = 1003.71STA = 129+97ELEV = 1006.77STA = 130+38ELEV = 1006.55STA = 127+19ELEV = 1007.24STA = 126+90ELEV = 1007.38STA = 128+93ELEV = 1006.96STA = 129+27ELEV = 1006.77-0.5%
-0.5%
-0.5%
-0.5%
EXISTING BRIDGE
TO REMAIN
X
X
X
XXX
X
X
XXXXXX
X
X
X XXXXXXX
X
XX
XXCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE
-
X
S
X
X XCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CECE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECECECECECESF FISHING C
R
E
E
K
ANTIOCH TRIBUTARY10051005101010101015101510201020
1025
10251
0
1
0
1015102010
2
5
STA: 127+45
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
INTERNAL CROSSING
STA: 126+27
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
INTERNAL CROSSING
1
2
7
+
0
0
STA: 127+45
SF FISHING CREEK
END REACH 4 - ENHANCEMENT II
BEGIN REACH 5 - RESTORATION
EXISTI
N
G
F
A
R
M
R
O
A
D
PROTECT EXISTING BRIDGE
TO REMAIN
INV: 1004.32'
LOW CORD: 1014.44'
DECK: 1016.06'
REMOVE EXISTING FENCE
IN CONSERVATION EASEMENT.FILL EXISTING CHANNEL (TYP)126+001
2
7
+
0
0
128+00 129+00130+00 131+00317+00 317+54PROTECT EXISTING BARN
TO REMAIN
PROTECT EXISTING BOULDER
TOE TO REMAIN
CHANNEL STABILIZATION FOR
CONCENTRATED FLOWS.
MATCH LINE - STA 126+20MATCH LINE - STA 130+50
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles SF.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaSouth Fork Fishing CreekStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.1.8December 12, 2018N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
Sheet Index
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.1.5
2.1.6
2.1.72.1.8
2.1.10
2.1.11
2.1.12
2.1.13
2.1.14
2.1.15
2.1.16
2.1.17
2.1.18
2.1.1
2.1.9SF FISHING
CREEKCHICKENTRIBUTARYCRIT
C
H
E
R
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
ANTI
O
C
H
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
1000
1005
1010
1015
1000
1005
1010
1015
130+50 131+00 131+50 132+00 132+50 133+00 133+50 134+00 134+50 135+00
PROPOSED GRADE
EXISTING GROUNDPROPOSED BANKFULL
STA = 130+64ELEV = 1002.78STA = 130+86ELEV = 1002.78STA = 131+30ELEV = 1006.55STA = 131+93ELEV = 1006.06STA = 132+15ELEV = 1002.17STA = 132+34ELEV = 1002.17STA = 132+61ELEV = 1005.86STA = 133+16ELEV = 1005.35STA = 133+44
ELEV = 1002.38 STA = 133+80ELEV = 1002.38STA = 134+12ELEV = 1005.05STA = 134+27ELEV = 1004.85STA = 134+61ELEV = 1000.28STA = 134+95ELEV = 1000.28-0.8%
-0.9%
-1.4%
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
S
F

F
I
SH
ING
CR
E
E
K
100
5
1005
10
1
0
1
0
1
5
10
2
0
10
2
5
1030
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL (TYP)FI
L
L
EX
I
ST
ING
CHANNE
L

(T
YP
)
EXISTING F
A
R
M

R
O
A
D
130+00131+00
132+0
0
1
3
3
+
0
0
134+
0
0
13
5
+
0
0
MATCH LINE - STA 130+50MATCH LINE - STA 135+00
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles SF.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaSouth Fork Fishing CreekStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.1.9December 12, 2018N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
Sheet Index
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.1.5
2.1.6
2.1.72.1.8
2.1.10
2.1.11
2.1.12
2.1.13
2.1.14
2.1.15
2.1.16
2.1.17
2.1.18
2.1.1
2.1.9SF FISHING
CREEKCHICKENTRIBUTARYCRIT
C
H
E
R
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
ANTI
O
C
H
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
995
1000
1005
1010
995
1000
1005
1010
135+00 135+50 136+00 136+50 137+00 137+50 138+00 138+50 139+00 139+50
PROPOSED GRADE
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED BANKFULLSTA = 135+38ELEV = 1004.40STA = 135+65ELEV = 1004.16STA = 135+82ELEV = 1000.87STA = 135+91ELEV = 1000.87STA = 136+04ELEV = 1003.76STA = 139+12ELEV = 997.30STA = 139+30ELEV = 997.30STA = 139+48ELEV = 1002.02STA = 138+31ELEV = 1002.76STA = 138+93ELEV = 1002.22-0.9%
-0.4%
-0.9%
X
X XXX
X
X
X XXX
X
X
X
X
XXXXXXOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHECE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSXXXX
OUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
F
SF FISHIN
G

C
R
E
E
K
200' POWE
R

E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
C
H
I
C
K
E
N

T
R
I
B

1
STA: 136+46
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
INTERNAL CROSSING
STA: 138+51
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
INTERNAL CROSSING
1000
10
0
0
1
0
0
5
100510051005 1010STA: 139+02
SF FISHING CREEK
END REACH 5 - RESTORATION
BEGIN REACH 6 - RESTORATION
EXISTING 12" RCP
INV IN: 1003.87'
INV OUT: 1002.62'
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL (TYP)EXISTING F
AR
M
R
O
A
D
RE
M
O
V
E

E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G

F
E
N
C
E
IN
C
O
N
S
E
R
V
A
T
I
O
N

E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
134+00135+00
136+00 137+00
138+00
139+00
140+00414+0041
5
+
0
0
PROPOSED WETLAND
TREATMENT BMP
MATCH
L
INE

-
STA
135+00MATCH LINE - STA 139+50
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles SF.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaSouth Fork Fishing CreekStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.1.10December 12, 2018N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
Sheet Index
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.1.5
2.1.6
2.1.72.1.8
2.1.10
2.1.11
2.1.12
2.1.13
2.1.14
2.1.15
2.1.16
2.1.17
2.1.18
2.1.1
2.1.9SF FISHING
CREEKCHICKENTRIBUTARYCRIT
C
H
E
R
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
ANTI
O
C
H
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
995
1000
1005
1010
995
1000
1005
1010
139+50 140+00 140+50 141+00 141+50 142+00 142+50 143+00 143+50 143+80
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULLSTA = 140+22ELEV = 1001.34STA = 140+45ELEV = 996.73STA = 140+67ELEV = 996.73STA = 140+89ELEV = 1001.34STA = 141+54ELEV = 1000.62STA = 141+90ELEV = 996.09STA = 142+25ELEV = 996.09STA = 142+61ELEV = 1000.62STA = 143+11ELEV = 1000.04STA = 143+34ELEV = 996.71STA = 143+58ELEV = 996.71-1.1%
-1.2%
-0.9%
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXC
E
-
X
S
XXXXXXXXX
X
X
OUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEC
E
C
E CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
SF FISHING CREEK
1000
1000
1005
1005
1
0
0
0
1000
1005FILL EXISTING CHANNEL (TYP)
REMOVE EXISTING FENCE
IN CONSERVATION EASEMENT139+
00
14
0
+
0
0
141+00142+00
143+00144+
0
0
MATCH LINE - STA 139+50MATCH LINE - STA 143+80
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles SF.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaSouth Fork Fishing CreekStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.1.11December 12, 2018N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
Sheet Index
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.1.5
2.1.6
2.1.72.1.8
2.1.10
2.1.11
2.1.12
2.1.13
2.1.14
2.1.15
2.1.16
2.1.17
2.1.18
2.1.1
2.1.9SF FISHING
CREEKCHICKENTRIBUTARYCRIT
C
H
E
R
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
ANTI
O
C
H
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
990
995
1000
1005
990
995
1000
1005
143+80 144+00 144+50 145+00 145+50 146+00 146+50 147+00 147+50 148+00 148+20
PROPOSED GRADE
EXISTING GROUNDPROPOSED BANKFULLSTA = 143+82ELEV = 1000.04STA = 144+36ELEV = 999.61STA = 144+70ELEV = 994.90STA = 145+03ELEV = 994.90STA = 145+37ELEV = 999.61STA = 146+13ELEV = 998.91STA = 146+39ELEV = 993.82STA = 146+64ELEV = 993.82STA = 146+89ELEV = 998.91STA = 147+49ELEV = 998.28STA = 147+89ELEV = 993.32-0.8%
-0.9%
-1.0%XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
X
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
1000
10001005
10
0
5
1000
10
0
0
1000STA: 144+28
SF FISHING CREEK
END REACH 6 - RESTORATION
BEGIN REACH 7 - RESTORATION
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL (TYP)
REMOVE EXISTING FENCE
IN CONSERVATION EASEMENT
14
3
+
0
0 144+00145+00
1
4
6
+
0
0
147+00148+00
S
F

F
I
SH
ING

C
R
E
E
K
PROPOSED WETLAND
TREATMENT BMP
MATCH L
INE

-
STA
143+80MATCH LINE - STA 148+20
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles SF.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaSouth Fork Fishing CreekStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.1.12December 12, 2018N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
Sheet Index
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.1.5
2.1.6
2.1.72.1.8
2.1.10
2.1.11
2.1.12
2.1.13
2.1.14
2.1.15
2.1.16
2.1.17
2.1.18
2.1.1
2.1.9SF FISHING
CREEKCHICKENTRIBUTARYCRIT
C
H
E
R
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
ANTI
O
C
H
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
989
990
995
1000
1005
989
990
995
1000
1005
148+20 148+50 149+00 149+50 150+00 150+50 151+00 151+50 152+00 152+50
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED BANKFULL
PROPOSED GRADESTA = 148+30ELEV = 993.32STA = 148+70ELEV = 998.28STA = 149+41ELEV = 997.53STA = 149+77ELEV = 992.23STA = 150+13ELEV = 992.23STA = 150+49ELEV = 997.53STA = 150+90ELEV = 997.08STA = 151+21ELEV = 992.41STA = 151+54ELEV = 992.41STA = 151+86ELEV = 997.08STA = 152+22ELEV = 996.73STA = 152+45ELEV = 991.00-1.1%
-1.1%
-1.0%
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE
SF F
ISH
ING
CREEKROBIN HILL TRIBUTARY1000
1000
1000
99
5
9951000
10
0
0
1000
STA: 151+07
SF FISHING CREEK
END REACH 7 - RESTORATION
BEGIN REACH 8 - RESTORATION
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL (TYP)
REMOVE EXISTING FENCE
IN CONSERVATION EASEMENT
148+00
149+00150+00 151+001
5
2
+
0
0511+0051
2
+
0
0
51
2
+
3
5MATCH L
INE

-
STA
148+20MATCH LINE - STA 152+50
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles SF.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaSouth Fork Fishing CreekStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.1.13December 12, 2018N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
Sheet Index
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.1.5
2.1.6
2.1.72.1.8
2.1.10
2.1.11
2.1.12
2.1.13
2.1.14
2.1.15
2.1.16
2.1.17
2.1.18
2.1.1
2.1.9SF FISHING
CREEKCHICKENTRIBUTARYCRIT
C
H
E
R
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
ANTI
O
C
H
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
987
990
995
1000
1005
987
990
995
1000
1005
152+50 153+00 153+50 154+00 154+50 155+00 155+50 156+00 156+50 157+00
EXISTING GROUNDPROPOSED BANKFULL
PROPOSED GRADESTA = 152+67ELEV = 991.00STA = 152+90ELEV = 996.73STA = 153+24ELEV = 996.23STA = 153+56ELEV = 991.04STA = 153+88ELEV = 991.04STA = 154+21ELEV = 996.23STA = 154+60ELEV = 995.57STA = 154+92ELEV = 990.54STA = 155+23ELEV = 990.54STA = 155+55ELEV = 995.57STA = 156+22ELEV = 994.80STA = 156+69ELEV = 990.07-1.5%
-1.7%
-1.2%
X
X
X
XXXX
XXXXXXXXXXCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
SF F
ISH
ING
CREEK
99
5
9951000
10
0
0
1000
995995
9951000 OAK TRIBUTARY995
995
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL (TYP)
REMOVE EXISTING FENCE
IN CONSERVATION EASEMENT
1
5
2
+
0
0
153+001
5
4
+
0
0
155+00 156+00157+00
605+00MATCH LINE - STA 152+50MATCH LINE - STA 157+00
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles SF.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaSouth Fork Fishing CreekStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.1.14December 12, 2018N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
Sheet Index
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.1.5
2.1.6
2.1.72.1.8
2.1.10
2.1.11
2.1.12
2.1.13
2.1.14
2.1.15
2.1.16
2.1.17
2.1.18
2.1.1
2.1.9SF FISHING
CREEKCHICKENTRIBUTARYCRIT
C
H
E
R
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
ANTI
O
C
H
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
ENHANCEMENT II REACH TREATMENTS:
1.EXCLUDE CATTLE
2.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION
3.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEE
PLANTING PLANS
985
990
995
1000
985
990
995
1000
157+00 157+50 158+00 158+50 159+00 159+50 160+00 160+50 161+00 161+50
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
-3.2%
-2.1%
-2.5%STA = 159+46ELEV = 991.20STA = 159+70ELEV = 990.70STA = 158+16ELEV = 992.97STA = 157+16ELEV = 990.07STA = 157+63ELEV = 994.30STA = 158+46ELEV = 989.24STA = 158+76ELEV = 989.24STA = 159+06ELEV = 992.47STA = 159+82ELEV = 990.81CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
OAK TRIBUTARY995
995
1000
100010051010
1015
1020
1025
1030
995
995
10
0
0
EXISTI
N
G
F
A
R
M
R
O
A
D
STA: 159+26
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
INTERNAL CROSSING
STA: 159+87
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
INTERNAL CROSSING
STA: 159+26
SF FISHING CREEK
END REACH 8 - RESTORATION
BEGIN REACH 9 - ENHANCEMENT II EXIST
ING
FARM
ROAD
EXISTING CULVERT CROSSING
TO BE IMPROVED.
60" CMP
INV IN: 991.2'
INV OUT: 990.7'
157+
0
0
158+00159+0
0 160+00161+00162+
0
0
606
+
5
4
605+00EXISTING FARM ROAD
TO BE DECOMMISSIONED AND
GRADE LOWERED BY 1.5'
FILL FLOODPLAIN BLOWOUT
AND STABILIZE.SF F
ISH
ING
CREEKMATCH LINE - STA 157+00MATCH LINE - STA 161+50
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles SF.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaSouth Fork Fishing CreekStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.1.15December 12, 2018N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
Sheet Index
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.1.5
2.1.6
2.1.72.1.8
2.1.10
2.1.11
2.1.12
2.1.13
2.1.14
2.1.15
2.1.16
2.1.17
2.1.18
2.1.1
2.1.9SF FISHING
CREEKCHICKENTRIBUTARYCRIT
C
H
E
R
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
ANTI
O
C
H
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
ENHANCEMENT II REACH TREATMENTS:
1.EXCLUDE CATTLE
2.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION
3.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEE
PLANTING PLANS
985
990
995
1000
985
990
995
1000
161+50 162+00 162+50 163+00 163+50 164+00 164+50 165+00 165+50 165+80
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED BANKFULL
PROPOSED GRADE
-0.5%STA = 165+64ELEV = 988.81STA = 165+27ELEV = 989.00STA = 165+14ELEV = 987.64STA = 165+80ELEV = 986.53CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
SF FISHING C
R
E
E
K
990990
995995
9
9
5
995
1000
1000
1000
1000
1005
100
5
1005
1005
1010
1010
1010
10101015
1015
1015
1020
1020
1020
1025 1025
99
0
990
995
99
5
1000
1005
1010
1015
1020
1025
1030
1035
STA: 165+14
SF FISHING CREEK
END REACH 9 - ENHANCEMENT II
BEGIN REACH 10 - RESTORATION
EXISTING FAR
M

R
O
A
D
162
+
0
0
163+00
164+00 165+00
166+0
0
EXISTING FARM ROAD
TO BE DECOMMISSIONED AND
GRADE LOWERED BY 1.5'MATCH LINE - STA 161+50MATCH LINE - STA 165+80
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles SF.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaSouth Fork Fishing CreekStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.1.16December 12, 2018N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
Sheet Index
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.1.5
2.1.6
2.1.72.1.8
2.1.10
2.1.11
2.1.12
2.1.13
2.1.14
2.1.15
2.1.16
2.1.17
2.1.18
2.1.1
2.1.9SF FISHING
CREEKCHICKENTRIBUTARYCRIT
C
H
E
R
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
ANTI
O
C
H
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
980
985
990
995
980
985
990
995
165+80 166+00 166+50 167+00 167+50 168+00 168+50 169+00 169+50 170+00 170+20
EXISTING GROUND PROPOSED BANKFULL
PROPOSED GRADESTA = 166+04ELEV = 986.53STA = 166+24ELEV = 988.81STA = 166+62ELEV = 988.58STA = 166+78ELEV = 984.75STA = 166+94ELEV = 984.75STA = 167+10ELEV = 988.26STA = 167+42ELEV = 988.04STA = 167+61ELEV = 984.49STA = 167+80ELEV = 984.49STA = 168+00ELEV = 988.09STA = 168+39ELEV = 987.76STA = 168+78ELEV = 982.11STA = 169+26ELEV = 982.11STA = 169+74ELEV = 987.61-0.6%
-0.7%-0.8%
-1.0%CECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECESF
F
I
S
H
I
N
G

C
R
E
E
K
W
F

F
I
S
H
I
N
G

C
R
E
E
K
990
990
990
995995
9951000
1000 100010051010101510201025
1030
STA: 168+60
SF FISHING CREEK
END REACH 10 - RESTORATION
BEGIN REACH 11 - RESTORATION
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL (TYP)165+00166+00167+
0
0
168+00169+00
170+0017
1
+
0
0731+00MATCH

L
IN
E

-

S
TA

1
6
5
+
8
0 MATCH LINE - STA 170+20
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles SF.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaSouth Fork Fishing CreekStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.1.17December 12, 2018N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
Sheet Index
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.1.5
2.1.6
2.1.72.1.8
2.1.10
2.1.11
2.1.12
2.1.13
2.1.14
2.1.15
2.1.16
2.1.17
2.1.18
2.1.1
2.1.9SF FISHING
CREEKCHICKENTRIBUTARYCRIT
C
H
E
R
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
ANTI
O
C
H
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
980
985
990
995
980
985
990
995
170+20 170+50 171+00 171+50 172+00 172+50 173+00 173+50 174+00 174+50 174+70
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
STA = 170+38ELEV = 986.94STA = 170+95ELEV = 982.74STA = 171+52ELEV = 982.74STA = 172+08ELEV = 986.94STA = 172+57ELEV = 986.49STA = 172+96ELEV = 981.50STA = 173+34ELEV = 981.50STA = 173+73ELEV = 986.49STA = 174+29ELEV = 986.00-0.9%
-0.9%
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECESF FISHING CREEK990
985
9909951000
1005
985
9
8
5
9
9
0
99
5
10001
0
0
5
1
0
1
0
10
1
5
985
985
990END REACH 10 - RESTORATION
BEGIN REACH 11 - RESTORATION
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL (TYP)170+00171+0
0 172+00173+
0
0
17
4
+
0
0
175+00
MATCH LINE - STA 170+20MATCH L
INE
-
STA
174+70
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles SF.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaSouth Fork Fishing CreekStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.1.18December 12, 2018N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
Sheet Index
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.1.5
2.1.6
2.1.72.1.8
2.1.10
2.1.11
2.1.12
2.1.13
2.1.14
2.1.15
2.1.16
2.1.17
2.1.18
2.1.1
2.1.9SF FISHING
CREEKCHICKENTRIBUTARYCRIT
C
H
E
R
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
ANTI
O
C
H
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
978
980
985
990
995
978
980
985
990
995
174+70 175+00 175+50 176+00 176+50 177+00 177+50 178+00 178+50 179+00 179+50 180+00
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
STA = 174+82ELEV = 981.25STA = 175+36ELEV = 981.25STA = 175+90ELEV = 986.00STA = 176+53ELEV = 984.95STA = 176+97ELEV = 980.77STA = 177+40ELEV = 980.77STA = 177+84ELEV = 984.95STA = 178+29ELEV = 983.82STA = 178+59ELEV = 979.50STA = 178+85ELEV = 979.50STA = 179+13ELEV = 983.32STA = 179+49ELEV = 982.35STA = 179+95ELEV = 981.30-1.7%
-2.5%
-2.7%XXXXX
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECESF F
ISH
ING
CREEK
985985
990985
9
8
5
985
98599
0
990
990990
990
995985
985
990
990STA: 179+52
SF FISHING CREEK
END REACH 11 - RESTORATION
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL (TYP)
1
7
4
+
0
0
175+00 176+00177+00
178+00179+00 180+00DEBRIS PILE TO BE REMOVED
MATCH LINE - STA 174+70
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Critcher.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaCritcher TributaryStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.2.1December 12, 2018Sheet IndexN
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.2.5
2.2.6
2.2.7
2.2.9
2.2.8
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.4
2.3.72.3.8
2.3.5
2.3.6
CRITCHER
TRIBUTARY
ANTIOCH
TRIBUTARYSF F
ISH
ING
CREEK
0'5'10'15'
(VERTICAL)
1045
1050
1055
1060
1065
1070
1075
1080
1045
1050
1055
1060
1065
1070
1075
1080
200+00 200+50 201+00 201+50 202+00 202+50 203+00 203+50 204+00 204+20
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
EXISTING GROUNDSTA = 200+00ELEV = 1072.34STA = 200+19ELEV = 1071.30STA = 200+22
ELEV = 1070.00
STA = 200+25
ELEV = 1070.00 STA = 200+28ELEV = 1070.80STA = 200+42ELEV = 1069.96STA = 200+50
ELEV = 1068.72
STA = 200+57
ELEV = 1068.72 STA = 200+65ELEV = 1069.45STA = 200+77ELEV = 1068.84STA = 200+80
ELEV = 1067.64
STA = 200+83
ELEV = 1067.64 STA = 200+85ELEV = 1068.40STA = 200+93
ELEV = 1068.03
STA = 201+00
ELEV = 1066.44
STA = 201+08
ELEV = 1066.44 STA = 201+16ELEV = 1067.50STA = 201+23
ELEV = 1067.00
STA = 201+28
ELEV = 1065.54
STA = 201+33
ELEV = 1065.54 STA = 201+38ELEV = 1066.41STA = 201+47ELEV = 1065.90STA = 201+54
ELEV = 1064.63
STA = 201+62
ELEV = 1064.63 STA = 201+69ELEV = 1065.40STA = 201+74
ELEV = 1065.02
STA = 201+80
ELEV = 1063.27
STA = 201+86
ELEV = 1063.27 STA = 201+92ELEV = 1064.33STA = 202+07ELEV = 1063.30STA = 202+12
ELEV = 1060.75
STA = 202+17
ELEV = 1060.75 STA = 202+21ELEV = 1062.80STA = 202+26
ELEV = 1062.50
STA = 202+31
ELEV = 1060.02
STA = 202+36
ELEV = 1060.02 STA = 202+40ELEV = 1062.00STA = 202+48ELEV = 1061.60STA = 202+55
ELEV = 1059.82
STA = 202+62
ELEV = 1059.82 STA = 202+69ELEV = 1061.08STA = 202+79ELEV = 1060.55STA = 202+85
ELEV = 1058.43
STA = 202+92
ELEV = 1058.43 STA = 202+99ELEV = 1060.15STA = 203+09ELEV = 1059.70STA = 203+15
ELEV = 1057.99
STA = 203+21
ELEV = 1057.99 STA = 203+27ELEV = 1059.23STA = 203+33
ELEV = 1058.96
STA = 203+41
ELEV = 1056.84
STA = 203+50
ELEV = 1056.84 STA = 203+58ELEV = 1058.45STA = 203+73ELEV = 1057.73STA = 203+81
ELEV = 1055.46
STA = 203+89
ELEV = 1055.46 STA = 203+97ELEV = 1057.28STA = 204+15ELEV = 1056.52-5.5%
-5.9%
-5.2%
-5.2%
-6.7%
-5.8%
-7.4%
-6.8%
-5.8%
-4.8%
-5.4%
-4.6%
-4.5%
-4.8%
-4.3%CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE
10
7
0
1070
107
5
1075
1080
1080
1085
1090
1095
1070107510801065
1070
1075
STA: 202+07
CRITCHER TRIBUTARY
END REACH 1 - RESTORATION
BEGIN REACH 2 - RESTORATION
STA: 200+00
CRITCHER TRIBUTARY
BEGIN REACH 1 - RESTORATION
1070
200+
0
0
201+00
202+00
203+00
204+0
0
261+32260+00
261+0
0
CRITCHER TRIBUTARY
CRITC
H
E
R
T
RI
B
D
PROPOSED WETLAND TREATMENT BMP
MATCH LINE - STA 204+20
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Critcher.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaCritcher TributaryStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.2.2December 12, 2018Sheet IndexN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.2.5
2.2.6
2.2.7
2.2.9
2.2.8
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.4
2.3.72.3.8
2.3.5
2.3.6
CRITCHER
TRIBUTARY
ANTIOCH
TRIBUTARYSF F
ISH
ING
CREEK
1040
1045
1050
1055
1060
1040
1045
1050
1055
1060
204+20 204+50 205+00 205+50 206+00 206+50 207+00 207+50 208+00 208+50
STA = 204+26
ELEV = 1054.33
STA = 204+37
ELEV = 1054.33
STA = 204+48
ELEV = 1056.03
STA = 204+62
ELEV = 1055.35
STA = 204+69
ELEV = 1053.17
STA = 204+77
ELEV = 1053.17
STA = 204+85
ELEV = 1054.84
STA = 205+09ELEV = 1053.83STA = 205+14
ELEV = 1051.93
STA = 205+19
ELEV = 1051.93 STA = 205+24ELEV = 1053.67STA = 205+38ELEV = 1053.12STA = 205+42
ELEV = 1051.61
STA = 205+47
ELEV = 1051.61 STA = 205+51ELEV = 1052.99STA = 205+77ELEV = 1052.14STA = 205+81
ELEV = 1049.92
STA = 205+85
ELEV = 1049.92 STA = 205+90ELEV = 1052.00STA = 206+05ELEV = 1051.13STA = 206+19ELEV = 1049.18STA = 206+33ELEV = 1049.18STA = 206+47ELEV = 1050.70STA = 206+58ELEV = 1050.17STA = 206+63
ELEV = 1048.67
STA = 206+68
ELEV = 1048.67 STA = 206+74ELEV = 1050.02STA = 206+99ELEV = 1049.20STA = 207+05
ELEV = 1047.31
STA = 207+10
ELEV = 1047.31 STA = 207+16ELEV = 1049.04STA = 207+30ELEV = 1048.43STA = 207+37
ELEV = 1046.97
STA = 207+44
ELEV = 1046.97 STA = 207+51ELEV = 1048.23STA = 207+66ELEV = 1047.57STA = 207+77ELEV = 1046.02STA = 207+88ELEV = 1046.02STA = 207+99ELEV = 1047.22STA = 208+11ELEV = 1046.65STA = 208+15
ELEV = 1044.81
STA = 208+19
ELEV = 1044.81 STA = 208+24ELEV = 1046.64STA = 208+45ELEV = 1045.77PROPOSED GRADE
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED BANKFULL
-5.0
%
-4.2
%
-4.0
%
-3.3%
-5.
5
%
-4.8
%
-3.3%
-4.6
%
-4.5
%
-4.9
%
-4.1
%CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CRITCHER TRIB CCRITCHER TRIBUTARY
1050
105510601065
1070
1075
1080
1050
1055
1060
1065
1070
STA: 204+73
CRITCHER TRIBUTARY
END REACH 2 - RESTORATION
BEGIN REACH 3 - RESTORATION
1055
1060
1065
1070
1065
1055
1060
1065
1070
1075
1080
204+00205+00
206+
0
0
207+00
208+00
271+20271+00MATCH LINE - STA 204+20MATCH LINE - STA 208+50
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Critcher.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaCritcher TributaryStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.2.3December 12, 2018Sheet IndexN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.2.5
2.2.6
2.2.7
2.2.9
2.2.8
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.4
2.3.72.3.8
2.3.5
2.3.6
CRITCHER
TRIBUTARY
ANTIOCH
TRIBUTARYSF F
ISH
ING
CREEK
1030
1035
1040
1045
1050
1030
1035
1040
1045
1050
208+50 209+00 209+50 210+00 210+50 211+00 211+50 212+00 212+50 213+00
STA = 208+50
ELEV = 1044.28
STA = 208+56
ELEV = 1044.28
STA = 208+61
ELEV = 1045.61
STA = 208+75
ELEV = 1044.95
STA = 208+89
ELEV = 1043.36
STA = 209+03
ELEV = 1043.36
STA = 209+17
ELEV = 1044.45 STA = 209+26ELEV = 1043.96STA = 209+34
ELEV = 1042.05
STA = 209+42
ELEV = 1042.05 STA = 209+50ELEV = 1043.53STA = 209+65ELEV = 1042.77STA = 209+71
ELEV = 1041.30
STA = 209+77
ELEV = 1041.30 STA = 209+83ELEV = 1042.58STA = 210+00ELEV = 1042.06STA = 210+02
ELEV = 1040.20
STA = 210+04
ELEV = 1040.20
STA = 210+05
ELEV = 1042.01
STA = 210+25ELEV = 1041.01STA = 210+37
ELEV = 1039.00
STA = 210+48
ELEV = 1039.00 STA = 210+60ELEV = 1040.66STA = 210+77ELEV = 1040.01STA = 210+82
ELEV = 1038.32
STA = 210+88
ELEV = 1038.32 STA = 210+93ELEV = 1039.86STA = 211+16ELEV = 1039.13STA = 211+20
ELEV = 1037.11
STA = 211+25
ELEV = 1037.11 STA = 211+29ELEV = 1039.00STA = 211+43ELEV = 1038.34STA = 211+51
ELEV = 1036.89
STA = 211+59
ELEV = 1036.89 STA = 211+67ELEV = 1038.11STA = 211+93ELEV = 1037.32STA = 211+97
ELEV = 1035.50
STA = 212+01
ELEV = 1035.50 STA = 212+05ELEV = 1037.20STA = 212+22ELEV = 1036.52STA = 212+30
ELEV = 1035.05
STA = 212+37
ELEV = 1035.05 STA = 212+44ELEV = 1036.32STA = 212+51
ELEV = 1035.70
STA = 212+62
ELEV = 1033.71 STA = 212+74ELEV = 1033.71STA = 212+85ELEV = 1035.39STA = 212+94ELEV = 1034.99STA = 212+99
ELEV = 1033.48
-4.8
%
-5.1
%
-5.1
%
-3.1%
-5.1
%
-3.7
%
-3.2%
-4.8
%
-3.1%
-3.9
%
-8
.
9
%
-4.7
%
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
EXISTING GROUND
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
104
0
1045
1050
1055
106
0 10401045
1050
1055
CRITCHER TRIBUTARY
209+00
210+00
211+00
212+00
213+00
STABILIZE LATERAL CONCENTRATED
FLOW WITH LOG SILLS (TYP)MATCH LINE - STA 208+50MATCH LINE - STA 213+00
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Critcher.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaCritcher TributaryStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.2.4December 12, 2018Sheet IndexN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.2.5
2.2.6
2.2.7
2.2.9
2.2.8
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.4
2.3.72.3.8
2.3.5
2.3.6
CRITCHER
TRIBUTARY
ANTIOCH
TRIBUTARYSF F
ISH
ING
CREEK
1022
1025
1030
1035
1040
1022
1025
1030
1035
1040
213+00 213+50 214+00 214+50 215+00 215+50 216+00 216+50 217+00 217+50
STA = 213+04
ELEV = 1033.48
STA = 213+09
ELEV = 1034.85
STA = 213+22
ELEV = 1034.30
STA = 213+28
ELEV = 1032.41
STA = 213+34
ELEV = 1032.41
STA = 213+40
ELEV = 1034.14
STA = 213+49
ELEV = 1033.72
STA = 213+58ELEV = 1032.13STA = 213+66ELEV = 1032.13STA = 213+75ELEV = 1033.33STA = 213+85ELEV = 1033.00STA = 213+92
ELEV = 1030.73
STA = 214+00
ELEV = 1030.73 STA = 214+07ELEV = 1032.60STA = 214+41ELEV = 1030.98STA = 214+59
ELEV = 1028.90 STA = 214+78ELEV = 1028.90STA = 214+96ELEV = 1030.40STA = 215+17ELEV = 1029.40STA = 215+27ELEV = 1027.67STA = 215+38ELEV = 1027.67STA = 215+49ELEV = 1028.94STA = 215+74ELEV = 1027.80STA = 215+79
ELEV = 1026.04
STA = 215+84
ELEV = 1026.04 STA = 215+89ELEV = 1027.60STA = 216+16ELEV = 1026.93STA = 216+22
ELEV = 1025.76
STA = 216+28
ELEV = 1025.76 STA = 216+33ELEV = 1026.88STA = 216+84ELEV = 1026.44STA = 216+86
ELEV = 1024.69
STA = 216+88
ELEV = 1024.69
STA = 216+91
ELEV = 1026.43
STA = 217+20ELEV = 1026.11STA = 217+30
ELEV = 1024.07 STA = 217+41ELEV = 1024.07-4.3
%
-4.6
%
-3.2%
-4.8
%
-4.9
%
-4.6
%
-2.4%
-0.9%
-1.1%
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
EXISTING GROUND
CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
F
10301
0
3
5
10401
0
4
5
10301035
CRITCHER

T
R
I
B
U
T
A
R
Y
STA: 216+98
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
INTERNAL CROSSING
1025STA: 216+37
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
INTERNAL CROSSINGCRITCHER TRIB
A
1030
213+00
214+00 215+00216+00
217+0
0
218+00248+86248+00STA: 216+28
CRITCHER TRIBUTARY
END REACH 3 - RESTORATION
BEGIN REACH 4 - RESTORATION
EXISTING CONCRETE PAD
TO BE REMOVED
MATCH LINE - STA 213+00MATCH LINE - STA 217+50
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Critcher.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaCritcher TributaryStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.2.5December 12, 2018Sheet Index N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.2.5
2.2.6
2.2.7
2.2.9
2.2.8
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.4
2.3.72.3.8
2.3.5
2.3.6
CRITCHER
TRIBUTARY
ANTIOCH
TRIBUTARYSF F
ISH
ING
CREEK
1015
1020
1025
1030
1015
1020
1025
1030
217+50 218+00 218+50 219+00 219+50 220+00 220+50 221+00STA = 217+52ELEV = 1026.02STA = 217+95ELEV = 1025.50STA = 218+11ELEV = 1023.99STA = 218+26ELEV = 1023.99STA = 218+41ELEV = 1025.37STA = 218+89ELEV = 1024.81STA = 219+05ELEV = 1022.90STA = 219+22ELEV = 1022.90STA = 219+39ELEV = 1024.66STA = 219+71ELEV = 1024.20STA = 219+89ELEV = 1022.70STA = 220+06ELEV = 1022.70STA = 220+24ELEV = 1024.05STA = 220+42ELEV = 1023.75STA = 220+55ELEV = 1021.62STA = 220+68ELEV = 1021.62STA = 220+80ELEV = 1023.64STA = 217+52ELEV = 1026.02STA = 217+95ELEV = 1025.50STA = 218+11ELEV = 1023.99STA = 218+26ELEV = 1023.99STA = 218+41ELEV = 1025.37STA = 218+89ELEV = 1024.81STA = 219+05ELEV = 1022.90STA = 219+22ELEV = 1022.90STA = 219+39ELEV = 1024.66STA = 219+71ELEV = 1024.20STA = 219+89ELEV = 1022.70STA = 220+06ELEV = 1022.70STA = 220+24ELEV = 1024.05STA = 220+42ELEV = 1023.75STA = 220+55ELEV = 1021.62STA = 220+68ELEV = 1021.62STA = 220+80ELEV = 1023.64-1.2%
-1.2%
-1.4%
-1.6%
-0.7%
-1.2%
-1.2%
-1.4%
-1.6%
-0.7%
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
EXISTING GROUND
XXXXXXXXXXXX
X
X
X
X
CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CECECECECE
SF FISHING CREEKCRITCHER TRIBUTARYSTA: 216+98
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
INTERNAL CROSSING 1025102510
2
5
1025102510
2
5
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
11
3
+
0
0
11
4
+
0
0
11
5
+
0
0 116+00221
+
1
3
217+0
0
21
8
+
0
0
219+
0
0
220+00
221
+
0
0
REMOVE EXISTING FENCE
IN CONSERVATION EASEMENT
EXISTING CONCRETE PAD
TO BE REMOVED
STA: 221+13
CRITCHER TRIBUTARY
END REACH 4 - RESTORATION
MATCH L
INE

-
STA
217+50
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Critcher.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaCritcher Trib AStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.2.6December 12, 2018Sheet Index N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.2.5
2.2.6
2.2.7
2.2.9
2.2.8
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.4
2.3.72.3.8
2.3.5
2.3.6
CRITCHER
TRIBUTARY
ANTIOCH
TRIBUTARYSF F
ISH
ING
CREEK
1028
1030
1035
1040
1045
1028
1030
1035
1040
1045
240+00 240+50 241+00 241+50 242+00 242+50 243+00 243+50 244+00 244+20STA = 240+04ELEV = 1039.46STA = 240+14ELEV = 1039.30STA = 240+21
ELEV = 1037.57
STA = 240+28
ELEV = 1037.57 STA = 240+35ELEV = 1039.20STA = 240+56ELEV = 1038.86STA = 240+60
ELEV = 1036.80
STA = 240+65
ELEV = 1036.80 STA = 240+69ELEV = 1038.79STA = 240+91ELEV = 1038.41STA = 240+97
ELEV = 1036.47
STA = 241+03
ELEV = 1036.47 STA = 241+10ELEV = 1038.32STA = 241+23ELEV = 1038.03STA = 241+29
ELEV = 1036.29
STA = 241+35
ELEV = 1036.29 STA = 241+41ELEV = 1037.95STA = 241+62ELEV = 1037.63STA = 241+65
ELEV = 1035.56
STA = 241+68
ELEV = 1035.56 STA = 241+71ELEV = 1037.59STA = 241+94ELEV = 1037.23STA = 241+98
ELEV = 1035.47
STA = 242+02
ELEV = 1035.47 STA = 242+06ELEV = 1037.18STA = 242+20ELEV = 1036.65STA = 242+37ELEV = 1034.71STA = 242+54ELEV = 1034.71STA = 242+71ELEV = 1036.40STA = 242+81ELEV = 1036.17STA = 242+87
ELEV = 1034.42
STA = 242+92
ELEV = 1034.42 STA = 242+98ELEV = 1036.09STA = 243+26ELEV = 1035.45STA = 243+40ELEV = 1033.59STA = 243+55ELEV = 1033.59STA = 243+70ELEV = 1035.24STA = 243+98ELEV = 1034.68STA = 244+09ELEV = 1032.98STA = 244+20
ELEV = 1032.98
-1.6%
-1.7%
-1.8%
-2.1%
-1.5%
-1.5%
-3.8
%
-2.3%
-2.3%
-2.0%
PROPOSED GRADE
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED BANKFULL
XXXXXXXXXXXX
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CRITCHER TRIB A
STA: 240+00
CRITCHER TRIB A
BEGIN REACH 1 - RESTORATION
1040
1045
1050
1055
1040
1045
1
0
5
0
240+00
241+00 242+00
243+0
0
2
4
4
+
0
0
DEBRIS PILE TO
BE REMOVED MATCH LINE - STA 244+20
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Critcher.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaCritcher Trib AStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.2.7December 12, 2018Sheet Index N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.2.5
2.2.6
2.2.7
2.2.9
2.2.8
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.4
2.3.72.3.8
2.3.5
2.3.6
CRITCHER
TRIBUTARY
ANTIOCH
TRIBUTARYSF F
ISH
ING
CREEK
1023
1025
1030
1035
1040
1023
1025
1030
1035
1040
244+20 244+50 245+00 245+50 246+00 246+50 247+00 247+50 248+00 248+50STA = 244+30ELEV = 1034.52STA = 244+58ELEV = 1033.71STA = 244+72
ELEV = 1032.03
STA = 244+87
ELEV = 1032.03STA = 245+01ELEV = 1033.28STA = 245+11ELEV = 1032.80STA = 245+27ELEV = 1031.10STA = 245+43ELEV = 1031.10STA = 245+59ELEV = 1032.30STA = 245+84ELEV = 1031.49STA = 245+94ELEV = 1029.84STA = 246+04ELEV = 1029.84STA = 246+14ELEV = 1031.26STA = 246+41ELEV = 1030.51STA = 246+52ELEV = 1028.83STA = 246+64ELEV = 1028.83STA = 246+75ELEV = 1030.34STA = 247+16ELEV = 1029.48STA = 247+32
ELEV = 1027.43
STA = 247+47
ELEV = 1027.43 STA = 247+62ELEV = 1029.24STA = 247+85ELEV = 1028.64STA = 247+99
ELEV = 1026.98
STA = 248+14
ELEV = 1026.98 STA = 248+29ELEV = 1028.42STA = 248+44ELEV = 1028.06PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
EXISTING GROUND
-3.0%
-4.8
%
-3.2%
-2.9%
-2.1%
-2.7%
-2.3%CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECECECEF1030
STA: 216+37
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
INTERNAL CROSSING
CRITCHER TRIBUTARYCRITCHER TRIB A
103010351040104510301035216+00217+00248+
8
6
244+00
2
4
5
+
0
0
246+00 247+0024
8
+
0
0
STA: 248+86
CRITCHER TRIB A
END REACH 1 - RESTORATION
MATCH L
INE

-
STA
244+20
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Critcher.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaCritcher Trib CStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.2.8December 12, 2018Sheet IndexN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.2.5
2.2.6
2.2.7
2.2.9
2.2.8
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.4
2.3.72.3.8
2.3.5
2.3.6
CRITCHER
TRIBUTARY
ANTIOCH
TRIBUTARYSF F
ISH
ING
CREEK
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)
1047
1050
1055
1060
1065
1047
1050
1055
1060
1065
270+00 270+50 271+00 271+20
STA = 270+11
ELEV = 1055.94
STA = 270+13
ELEV = 1055.93
STA = 270+22
ELEV = 1055.82
STA = 270+38
ELEV = 1055.65
STA = 270+46
ELEV = 1055.65
STA = 270+60
ELEV = 1055.58
STA = 270+69
ELEV = 1055.58
STA = 270+81
ELEV = 1055.40
STA = 270+87
ELEV = 1055.40
STA = 271+02
ELEV = 1055.28
STA = 271+12
ELEV = 1055.28
STA = 271+18
ELEV = 1054.95
STA = 270+00
ELEV = 1056.00
STA = 270+00
ELEV = 1056.00 STA = 270+12ELEV = 1055.04STA = 270+12ELEV = 1055.04STA = 270+24ELEV = 1055.08STA = 270+24ELEV = 1055.08STA = 270+42ELEV = 1054.80STA = 270+42ELEV = 1054.80STA = 270+65ELEV = 1054.48STA = 270+65ELEV = 1054.48STA = 270+84ELEV = 1054.58STA = 270+84ELEV = 1054.58STA = 271+07ELEV = 1054.37STA = 271+07ELEV = 1054.37PROPOSED GRADE
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED BANKFULL
-0.5%-1.4%-1.6%-0.5%-1.5%-0.8%-5.
5
%CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CECECECECECE CECECECECECECECECECECECECE108010751080STA: 270+03
CRITCHER TRIB C
BEGIN REACH 1 - RESTORATION
10651
0
7
010751080108510901095107010751080108510901095 106510701075108010
8
5
1
0
9
0
10
9
5 105510601065107010751080108510901095CRITCHER TRIB C CRITCHER TRIBUTARYSTA: 271+20
CRITCHER TRIB C
END REACH 1 - RESTORATION
2
0
4
+
0
0
205+00271
+
2
0
269
+
1
9
270+00271+00
PROPOSED WETLAND TREATMENT BMP
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Critcher.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaCritcher Trb DStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.2.9December 12, 2018Sheet IndexN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.2.5
2.2.6
2.2.7
2.2.9
2.2.8
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.4
2.3.72.3.8
2.3.5
2.3.6
CRITCHER
TRIBUTARY
ANTIOCH
TRIBUTARYSF F
ISH
ING
CREEK
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)
1060
1065
1070
1075
1060
1065
1070
1075
260+00 260+50 261+00 261+40
STA = 260+00
ELEV = 1069.60 STA = 260+08ELEV = 1069.20STA = 260+12
ELEV = 1068.02
STA = 260+16
ELEV = 1068.02 STA = 260+20ELEV = 1068.62STA = 260+28
ELEV = 1068.30
STA = 260+30
ELEV = 1067.15
STA = 260+32
ELEV = 1067.15 STA = 260+34ELEV = 1067.96STA = 260+44ELEV = 1067.50STA = 260+47
ELEV = 1066.30
STA = 260+51
ELEV = 1066.30 STA = 260+54ELEV = 1066.98STA = 260+60
ELEV = 1066.75
STA = 260+64
ELEV = 1065.49
STA = 260+68
ELEV = 1065.49 STA = 260+73ELEV = 1066.23STA = 260+79
ELEV = 1065.88
STA = 260+81
ELEV = 1064.66
STA = 260+82
ELEV = 1064.66
STA = 260+84
ELEV = 1065.70
STA = 260+95ELEV = 1064.93STA = 260+99
ELEV = 1063.81
STA = 261+02
ELEV = 1063.81STA = 261+05ELEV = 1064.49STA = 261+15ELEV = 1063.86STA = 261+17
ELEV = 1062.93
STA = 261+18
ELEV = 1062.93
STA = 261+20
ELEV = 1063.76
STA = 261+32ELEV = 1063.20-5.0
%
-4.1
%
-4.4
%
-4.1
%
-5.
3
%
-6.
8
%
-6.
4
%
-4.9
%
PROPOSED BANKFULL
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED GRADE
XXXXCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
C
E
CE
CE
CE
C
E
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CRI
T
C
H
E
R

T
R
I
B
U
T
A
R
Y
CRITCHER TRIB D 1070107
0
1075
108
0
1085
107010751080106
5
1
0
7
0
10
7
5
1
0
8
0
1
0
8
5108510
8
5
10
9
0
10
9
5
1100
10
7
0
STA: 260+00
CRITCHER TRIB D
BEGIN REACH 1 - RESTORATION
STA: 261+32
CRITCHER TRIB D
END REACH 1 - RESTORATION
20
1
+
0
0
2
0
2
+
0
0
203
+
0
0
261+
3
2
260+
0
0
261+00
PROPOSED WETLAND TREATMENT BMP
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Antioch.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaAntioch TributaryStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.3.1December 12, 2018Sheet IndexN0'5'10'15'
(VERTICAL)
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.2.5
2.2.6
2.2.7
2.2.8
2.2.9
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.4
2.3.8
2.3.9
2.3.5
2.3.6
2.3.11
CRITCHER
TRIBUTARY
ANTIOCH
TRIBUTARYSF FISH
ING
CREEK
2.3.7
2.3.10
ENHANCEMENT II REACH TREATMENTS:
1.EXCLUDE CATTLE
2.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION
3.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEE
PLANTING PLANS
1030
1035
1040
1045
1050
1055
1060
1065
1070
1030
1035
1040
1045
1050
1055
1060
1065
1070
300+00 300+50 301+00 301+50 302+00 302+50 303+00 303+50 304+00 304+20
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
STA = 301+62
ELEV = 1047.40 STA = 302+08ELEV = 1047.04STA = 302+35ELEV = 1045.86STA = 302+50ELEV = 1045.58STA = 302+77ELEV = 1044.30STA = 302+83
ELEV = 1043.82 STA = 303+16ELEV = 1042.70STA = 303+25ELEV = 1042.10STA = 303+60ELEV = 1040.57STA = 303+71ELEV = 1040.05STA = 303+92ELEV = 1038.98STA = 303+98
ELEV = 1037.35
STA = 304+04
ELEV = 1037.35STA = 304+10ELEV = 1038.34STA = 302+00
ELEV = 1045.90
STA = 302+00
ELEV = 1045.90 STA = 301+94ELEV = 1047.23STA = 301+94ELEV = 1047.23STA = 302+42
ELEV = 1044.62
STA = 302+42
ELEV = 1044.62
STA = 302+78
ELEV = 1042.90
STA = 302+78
ELEV = 1042.90
STA = 303+21
ELEV = 1040.93
STA = 303+21
ELEV = 1040.93
STA = 303+66
ELEV = 1039.35
STA = 303+66
ELEV = 1039.35
-4.3%
-4.7%
-3.3%
-4.3%
-0.5%XXXXXXXXXX
X CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CEANTIOC
H

T
R
I
B
U
T
A
R
Y
ANT
I
O
C
H

T
R
I
B

C
STA: 301+85
ANTIOCH TRIBUTARY
END REACH 1 - ENHANCEMENT II
BEGIN REACH 2 - RESTORATION
STA: 300+00
ANTIOCH TRIBUTARY
BEGIN REACH 1 - ENHANCEMENT II 1050105510601065107
0
10
7
5108010851090 1050
1055
1060
1065
1070
1075
1080
1050
1055
1060
1065
1070
1075
1080
1085
1045
1050
105
5
106
0
1065
1045
1050
1055
1060
1065
1070
1075
1060REMOVE EXISTING FENCE
IN CONSERVATION EASEMENT
300+00 301+00302+0
0
30
3
+
0
0
304+00
3
8
6
+
2
2
385+00
386+00
INSTALL SILL TO PROTECT
WETLAND GRADE
MATCH LINE - STA 304+20
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Antioch.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaAntioch TributaryStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.3.2December 12, 2018Sheet IndexN
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.2.5
2.2.6
2.2.7
2.2.8
2.2.9
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.4
2.3.8
2.3.9
2.3.5
2.3.6
2.3.11
CRITCHER
TRIBUTARY
ANTIOCH
TRIBUTARYSF FISH
ING
CREEK
2.3.7
2.3.10
0'5'10'15'
(VERTICAL)
1010
1015
1020
1025
1030
1035
1040
1045
1010
1015
1020
1025
1030
1035
1040
1045
304+20 304+50 305+00 305+50 306+00 306+50 307+00 307+50 308+00 308+50
PROPOSED GRADE
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED
BANKFULL-3.4%
-4.7%
-2.7%-3.0%
-2.4%
-2.7%
-2.5%
-2.8%
-4.2%
-3.3%STA = 304+39ELEV = 1037.37STA = 304+57ELEV = 1036.82STA = 304+69ELEV = 1036.24STA = 304+77
ELEV = 1035.90
STA = 304+93ELEV = 1035.00STA = 305+00
ELEV = 1033.50
STA = 305+06
ELEV = 1033.50 STA = 305+12ELEV = 1034.57STA = 305+31ELEV = 1034.04STA = 305+40ELEV = 1033.89STA = 305+52ELEV = 1033.50STA = 305+66ELEV = 1032.97STA = 305+81ELEV = 1032.62STA = 306+00ELEV = 1032.00STA = 306+15ELEV = 1031.60STA = 306+25ELEV = 1031.24STA = 306+45ELEV = 1030.72STA = 306+68ELEV = 1030.13STA = 306+86ELEV = 1029.63STA = 306+97ELEV = 1029.33STA = 307+20ELEV = 1028.06STA = 307+23
ELEV = 1026.25
STA = 307+26
ELEV = 1026.25 STA = 307+29ELEV = 1027.92STA = 307+58ELEV = 1026.71STA = 307+59
ELEV = 1025.18
STA = 307+65
ELEV = 1025.18 STA = 307+71ELEV = 1026.47STA = 307+97ELEV = 1025.60STA = 307+97
ELEV = 1023.68 STA = 308+08ELEV = 1023.68STA = 308+19ELEV = 1025.07STA = 308+35ELEV = 1024.19STA = 308+37
ELEV = 1022.56
STA = 308+40
ELEV = 1022.56STA = 308+43ELEV = 1024.08STA = 304+48ELEV = 1035.86STA = 304+48ELEV = 1035.86STA = 304+72
ELEV = 1034.55
STA = 304+72
ELEV = 1034.55
STA = 305+35
ELEV = 1033.03
STA = 305+35
ELEV = 1033.03
STA = 305+59
ELEV = 1032.03
STA = 305+59
ELEV = 1032.03 STA = 305+90ELEV = 1030.74STA = 305+90ELEV = 1030.74STA = 306+20
ELEV = 1030.42
STA = 306+20
ELEV = 1030.42 STA = 306+57ELEV = 1029.09STA = 306+57ELEV = 1029.09STA = 306+92
ELEV = 1028.32
STA = 306+92
ELEV = 1028.32
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECEC
E
CE
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
ANTIOCH TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
1045
1050
1055
1060
1045
STA: 307+03
ANTIOCH TRIBUTARY
END REACH 2 - RESTORATION
BEGIN REACH 3 - RESTORATION103510401
0
4
5
10501050 1050105510601
0
3
5
1
0
4
0
104510
5
0
10
5
5
1025
1030
1035
1040
1045ANTIOCH
TR
IB
B10401045304+00
305+0
0
306+
0
0
3
0
7
+
0
0
308+00358+00EXISTING 18" CMP
TO BE REMOVED
MATCH LINE - STA 304+20MATCH LINE - STA 308+50
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Antioch.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaAntioch TributaryStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.3.3December 12, 2018Sheet IndexN
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.2.5
2.2.6
2.2.7
2.2.8
2.2.9
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.4
2.3.8
2.3.9
2.3.5
2.3.6
2.3.11
CRITCHER
TRIBUTARY
ANTIOCH
TRIBUTARYSF FISH
ING
CREEK
2.3.7
2.3.10
0'5'10'15'
(VERTICAL)
1000
1005
1010
1015
1020
1025
1030
1000
1005
1010
1015
1020
1025
1030
308+50 309+00 309+50 310+00 310+50 311+00 311+50 312+00 312+50 313+00
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
EXISTING GROUND
-3.4%
-4.0%
-3.4%
-3.4%
-4.4%
-2.2%-2.8%
-3.7%
-2.8%
-3.4%
-4.0%
-3.4%
-3.4%
-4.4%
-2.2%-2.8%
-3.7%
-2.8%STA = 308+86ELEV = 1022.63STA = 309+05ELEV = 1022.06STA = 309+23ELEV = 1021.32STA = 309+23
ELEV = 1019.76
STA = 309+29
ELEV = 1019.76 STA = 309+34ELEV = 1021.12STA = 309+73ELEV = 1019.83STA = 309+85ELEV = 1019.47STA = 310+04ELEV = 1018.82STA = 310+04
ELEV = 1017.33
STA = 310+12
ELEV = 1017.33 STA = 310+20ELEV = 1018.30STA = 310+39ELEV = 1017.47STA = 310+54ELEV = 1015.30STA = 310+69ELEV = 1015.30STA = 310+84ELEV = 1016.88STA = 311+03ELEV = 1016.47STA = 311+14
ELEV = 1014.86
STA = 311+25
ELEV = 1014.86 STA = 311+35ELEV = 1016.33STA = 311+57ELEV = 1015.73STA = 311+76ELEV = 1013.80STA = 311+95ELEV = 1013.80STA = 312+13ELEV = 1015.49STA = 312+27ELEV = 1014.99STA = 312+44ELEV = 1013.44STA = 312+61ELEV = 1013.44STA = 312+77ELEV = 1014.76STA = 308+95ELEV = 1020.94STA = 308+95ELEV = 1020.94STA = 309+79
ELEV = 1018.07
STA = 309+79
ELEV = 1018.07
CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
ANTIOCH TRIBUTARY
STA: 313+09
ANTIOCH TRIBUTARY
END REACH 3 - RESTORATION
BEGIN REACH 4 - RESTORATION
1025
1030
1020
1020
1020
102
0
10201025
1025
1025
1030
1030
1030 10351035
1035
1040
1040
10451045
102
5
1
0
3
0
10
3
5 ANTIOCH TRIB A309+00 310+00 311+00312+
0
0
31
3
+
0
0
333+00MATCH LINE - STA 308+50MATCH LINE - STA 313+00
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Antioch.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaAntioch TributaryStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.3.4December 12, 2018Sheet IndexN
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.2.5
2.2.6
2.2.7
2.2.8
2.2.9
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.4
2.3.8
2.3.9
2.3.5
2.3.6
2.3.11
CRITCHER
TRIBUTARY
ANTIOCH
TRIBUTARYSF FISH
ING
CREEK
2.3.7
2.3.10
0'5'10'15'
(VERTICAL)
995
1000
1005
1010
1015
1020
1025
1030
995
1000
1005
1010
1015
1020
1025
1030
313+00 313+50 314+00 314+50 315+00 315+50 316+00 316+50 317+00 317+50 317+70
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
EXISTING GROUND
-1.3%-1.2%-1.0%
-1.9%-0.8%-0.8%-2.0%STA = 313+05ELEV = 1013.96STA = 313+16ELEV = 1012.42STA = 313+26ELEV = 1012.42STA = 313+36ELEV = 1013.82STA = 313+76ELEV = 1013.31STA = 313+89ELEV = 1011.59STA = 314+02ELEV = 1011.59STA = 314+15ELEV = 1013.31STA = 314+50ELEV = 1012.90STA = 314+67ELEV = 1010.77STA = 314+83ELEV = 1010.77STA = 315+00ELEV = 1012.90STA = 315+20ELEV = 1012.70STA = 315+30ELEV = 1010.76STA = 315+40ELEV = 1010.76STA = 315+50ELEV = 1012.50STA = 316+10ELEV = 1011.37STA = 316+16
ELEV = 1009.42
STA = 316+22
ELEV = 1009.42 STA = 316+28ELEV = 1011.30STA = 316+42ELEV = 1011.19STA = 316+51
ELEV = 1009.47
STA = 316+59
ELEV = 1009.47 STA = 316+68ELEV = 1011.10STA = 317+04ELEV = 1010.80STA = 317+14ELEV = 1008.31STA = 317+24ELEV = 1008.31STA = 317+34ELEV = 1010.41STA = 317+54ELEV = 1010.00XXCE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECECECECECE
CE
CE
S
F

F
I
SH
ING

C
R
E
E
K
ANTIOCH TRIBUTARY
STA: 317+54
ANTIOCH TRIBUTARY
END REACH 4 - RESTORATION
STA: 315+59
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
INTERNAL CROSSING
STA: 316+19
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
INTERNAL CROSSING
1
0
1
0
101
5
1020
102
5 10151020
1025
1030
1005
10
1
0
1
2
8
+
0
0
129+00317+54314+
0
0
315+00316+0
0
3
1
7
+
0
0
EXISTING 24" CMP
TO BE REMOVED349+43STA: 349+29
ANTIOCH TRIB A
END REACH 1 - ENHANCEMENT II
BEGIN REACH 2 - RESTORATION
MATCH LINE - STA 313+00
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Antioch.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaAntioch Trib AStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.3.5December 12, 2018Sheet IndexN
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.2.5
2.2.6
2.2.7
2.2.8
2.2.9
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.4
2.3.8
2.3.9
2.3.5
2.3.6
2.3.11
CRITCHER
TRIBUTARY
ANTIOCH
TRIBUTARYSF FISH
ING
CREEK
2.3.7
2.3.10
ENHANCEMENT II REACH TREATMENTS:
1.EXCLUDE CATTLE
2.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION
3.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEE
PLANTING PLANS
0'5'10'15'
(VERTICAL)
1020
1025
1030
1035
1040
1045
1050
1055
1020
1025
1030
1035
1040
1045
1050
1055
325+00 325+50 326+00 326+50 327+00 327+50 328+00 328+50 329+00 329+30
EXISTING GROUND
XXXXXXXXCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
ANTIOCH TRIB A
1040
1045
1050
1055
1060
10
6
5
10
7
0
1030
1035
1040
10451050103010351040
1040
1045
1045
1050
1050
1055
1055
1060
1060
REMOVE EXISTING FENCING
IN CONSERVATION EASEMENT
ANTIOCH TRIB A1340+0
0
341+0
0
342+00
34
3
+
0
0
344+
0
0
341+00341+78STA: 340+00
ANTIOCH TRIB A
BEGIN REACH 1 - ENHANCEMENT II
MATCH LINE - STA 329+30
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Antioch.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaAntioch Trib AStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.3.6December 12, 2018Sheet IndexN
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.2.5
2.2.6
2.2.7
2.2.8
2.2.9
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.4
2.3.8
2.3.9
2.3.5
2.3.6
2.3.11
CRITCHER
TRIBUTARY
ANTIOCH
TRIBUTARYSF FISH
ING
CREEK
2.3.7
2.3.10
0'5'10'15'
(VERTICAL)
ENHANCEMENT II REACH TREATMENTS:
1.EXCLUDE CATTLE
2.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION
3.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEE
PLANTING PLANS
990
995
1000
1005
1010
1015
1020
1025
1030
1035
1040
990
995
1000
1005
1010
1015
1020
1025
1030
1035
1040
329+30 329+50 330+00 330+50 331+00 331+50 332+00 332+50 333+00 333+50 334+00
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED
BANKFULLEXISTING GROUND
STA = 332+29
ELEV = 1017.70
STA = 332+44
ELEV = 1017.32
STA = 332+47
ELEV = 1015.15
STA = 332+49
ELEV = 1015.15
STA = 332+51
ELEV = 1017.27 STA = 332+97ELEV = 1016.19STA = 333+01
ELEV = 1014.79
STA = 333+05
ELEV = 1014.79 STA = 333+10ELEV = 1016.12STA = 333+26ELEV = 1015.60STA = 333+31
ELEV = 1014.39
STA = 333+37
ELEV = 1014.39
STA = 333+43
ELEV = 1015.46
STA = 333+50ELEV = 1015.20STA = 333+58
ELEV = 1012.96STA = 333+67ELEV = 1012.96STA = 333+75
ELEV = 1014.85
STA = 333+91ELEV = 1014.25-2.4%
-2.3%
-3.3%-3.6%
-3.7%CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECECEANTIOCH TRIB A 10201020
1020
1
0
2
5
1030
1035
1040 102510301035104010451050
102
5
1030
1035
1040
104
5
ANTIOCH TRIBUTARY
312+
0
0
313+00333+00
END ANTIOCH TRIB A1 - ENHANCEMENT II
345+00
346+00
347
+
0
0
REMOVE EXISTING
CULVERT
STA: 347+30
ANTIOCH TRIB A
END REACH 1 - ENHANCEMENT II
BEGIN REACH 2 - RESTORATION
STA: 347+45
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
INTERNAL CROSSING
STA: 348+08
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
INTERNAL CROSSING
STA: 349+29
ANTIOCH TRIB A
END REACH 1 - ENHANCEMENT II
BEGIN REACH 2 - RESTORATION
MATCH LINE - STA 329+30
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Antioch.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaAntioch Trib A1Stream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.3.7December 12, 2018Sheet IndexN
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.2.5
2.2.6
2.2.7
2.2.8
2.2.9
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.4
2.3.8
2.3.9
2.3.5
2.3.6
2.3.11
CRITCHER
TRIBUTARY
ANTIOCH
TRIBUTARYSF FISH
ING
CREEK
2.3.7
2.3.10
0'5'10'15'
(VERTICAL)
ENHANCEMENT II REACH TREATMENTS:
1.EXCLUDE CATTLE
2.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION
3.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEE
PLANTING PLANS
1025
1030
1035
1040
1025
1030
1035
1040
340+00 340+50 341+00 341+50 341+78
EXISTING GROUND
XXXXXXXCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE10
3
5
10
4
0
1045
1
0
5
0
ANTIOCH TRIB A1
STA: 340+00
BEGIN ANTIOCH TRIB A1 - ENHANCEMENT II STA: 341+78
END ANTIOCH TRIB A1 - ENHANCEMENT II 343+00340+00 341+00
341+
7
8
MATCH LINE - STA 329+30
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Antioch.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaAntioch Trib BStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.3.8December 12, 2018Sheet IndexN
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.2.5
2.2.6
2.2.7
2.2.8
2.2.9
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.4
2.3.8
2.3.9
2.3.5
2.3.6
2.3.11
CRITCHER
TRIBUTARY
ANTIOCH
TRIBUTARYSF FISH
ING
CREEK
2.3.7
2.3.10
ENHANCEMENT II REACH TREATMENTS:
1.EXCLUDE CATTLE
2.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION
3.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEE
PLANTING PLANS
0'5'10'15'
(VERTICAL)
1030
1035
1040
1045
1050
1055
1060
1065
1030
1035
1040
1045
1050
1055
1060
1065
350+00 350+50 351+00 351+50 352+00 352+50 353+00 353+50 354+00 354+20
EXISTING GROUND
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECECECECECEC
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
CE CE
ANTIOCH TRIB B
STA: 350+00
ANITOCH TRIB B
BEGIN REACH 1 - ENHANCEMENT II
10401045105010551060106510701075108010851090
1040
1045
1050
105
5
10
6
0
10651070107510
8
0
3
5
0
+
0
0
351+00
3
5
2
+
0
0
353+00
354+00
ANT
I
O
C
H

T
R
I
B

B
1
373
+
0
0
37
4
+
0
0
MATCH LINE - STA 354+20
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Antioch.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaAntioch Trib BStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.3.9December 12, 2018Sheet Index N2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.2.5
2.2.6
2.2.7
2.2.8
2.2.9
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.4
2.3.8
2.3.9
2.3.5
2.3.6
2.3.11
CRITCHER
TRIBUTARY
ANTIOCH
TRIBUTARYSF FISH
ING
CREEK
2.3.7
2.3.10
0'5'10'15'
(VERTICAL)
1010
1015
1020
1025
1030
1035
1040
1045
1050
1010
1015
1020
1025
1030
1035
1040
1045
1050
354+20 354+50 355+00 355+50 356+00 356+50 357+00 357+50 358+00 358+50
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
-1.0%-0.9%-1.4%-0.9%-1.0%-1.0%-0.9%-1.0%-1.2%-1.2%-1.2%-0.8%
-1.0%-0.9%-1.4%-0.9%-1.0%-1.0%-0.9%-1.0%-1.2%-1.2%-1.2%-0.8%
STA = 354+48
ELEV = 1032.09
STA = 354+57
ELEV = 1030.44
STA = 354+65
ELEV = 1030.44
STA = 354+73
ELEV = 1032.01
STA = 354+88
ELEV = 1031.87
STA = 354+91
ELEV = 1030.64 STA = 355+13ELEV = 1031.67STA = 355+15
ELEV = 1029.98
STA = 355+18
ELEV = 1029.98
STA = 355+20
ELEV = 1031.65
STA = 355+40ELEV = 1031.38STA = 355+47
ELEV = 1028.17
STA = 355+52
ELEV = 1028.17 STA = 355+59ELEV = 1031.32STA = 355+74ELEV = 1031.18STA = 355+78
ELEV = 1029.05
STA = 355+82
ELEV = 1029.05 STA = 355+85ELEV = 1031.15STA = 356+07ELEV = 1030.93STA = 356+11
ELEV = 1029.70
STA = 356+14
ELEV = 1029.70 STA = 356+18ELEV = 1030.89STA = 356+48ELEV = 1030.60STA = 356+54
ELEV = 1028.94
STA = 356+55
ELEV = 1028.94 STA = 356+62ELEV = 1030.54STA = 356+86ELEV = 1030.33STA = 356+89
ELEV = 1029.07
STA = 356+92
ELEV = 1029.07 STA = 356+95ELEV = 1030.30STA = 357+30ELEV = 1029.96STA = 357+36
ELEV = 1026.79
STA = 357+40
ELEV = 1026.79 STA = 357+46ELEV = 1029.91STA = 357+60ELEV = 1029.74STA = 357+66
ELEV = 1027.51
STA = 357+69
ELEV = 1027.51 STA = 357+75ELEV = 1029.69STA = 357+90ELEV = 1029.51STA = 357+94
ELEV = 1028.31
STA = 357+98
ELEV = 1028.31 STA = 358+03ELEV = 1029.47STA = 358+14ELEV = 1029.34STA = 358+17
ELEV = 1027.66
STA = 358+20
ELEV = 1027.66STA = 358+23ELEV = 1029.32STA = 358+38
ELEV = 1029.20STA = 354+95ELEV = 1031.84STA = 354+95ELEV = 1031.84CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CEANTIOC
H
T
R
I
B
B
1035
1040
1045
104010401045STA: 354+48
ANTIOCH TRIB B
END REACH 1 - ENHANCEMENT II
BEGIN REACH 2 - RESTORATION
1035
1040
1045
1050
1055
1060
1065
1
0
4
0
10451
0
5
0
1
0
4
010451050
1040
1045
STA: 358+38
ANTIOCH TRIB B
END REACH 2 - RESTORATION
307+00
354+00
355+00
356+00
357+00
358
+
0
0
ANTIOCH TRIBUTARY374+43
374+
0
0
STABI
L
I
Z
E

A
N
D

R
E
D
I
R
E
C
T
CONC
E
N
T
R
A
T
E
D

F
L
O
W

O
V
E
R
LOG S
T
E
P
S
MATCH LINE - STA 354+20
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Antioch.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaAntioch Trib B1Stream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.3.10December 12, 2018Sheet IndexN
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.2.5
2.2.6
2.2.7
2.2.8
2.2.9
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.4
2.3.8
2.3.9
2.3.5
2.3.6
2.3.11
CRITCHER
TRIBUTARY
ANTIOCH
TRIBUTARYSF FISH
ING
CREEK
2.3.7
2.3.10
ENHANCEMENT II REACH TREATMENTS:
1.EXCLUDE CATTLE
2.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION
3.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEE
PLANTING PLANS
0'5'10'15'
(VERTICAL)
1030
1035
1040
1045
1050
1055
1060
1030
1035
1040
1045
1050
1055
1060
370+00 370+50 371+00 371+50 372+00 372+50 373+00 373+50 374+00 374+50
EXISTING GROUND
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
ANTI
O
C
H
T
RI
B
B
10
4
01045
1050105510
6
0
10
6
5
107010751040
1045
1050
353+0
0
354+00
ANTIOCH TRIB B1
374+
4
3
370
+
0
0
371+
0
0
372
+
0
0 373+00
374+00
STA: 370+00
BEGIN ANTIOCH TRIB B1 - ENHANCEMENT II
STA: 374+43
END ANTIOCH TRIB B1 - ENHANCEMENT II
STABILIZE AND REDIRECT
CONCENTRATED FLOW OVER
LOG STEPS
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Antioch.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaAntioch Trib CStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.3.11December 12, 2018Sheet IndexN0'5'10'15'
(VERTICAL)
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.2.5
2.2.6
2.2.7
2.2.8
2.2.9
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.4
2.3.8
2.3.9
2.3.5
2.3.6
2.3.11
CRITCHER
TRIBUTARY
ANTIOCH
TRIBUTARYSF FISH
ING
CREEK
2.3.7
2.3.10
ENHANCEMENT II REACH TREATMENTS:
1.EXCLUDE CATTLE
2.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION
3.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEE
PLANTING PLANS
1040
1045
1050
1055
1060
1065
1040
1045
1050
1055
1060
1065
385+00 385+50 386+00 386+30
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED GRADE
XXXXXXXXX
X
X
X
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
STA: 385+00
ANTIOCH TRIB C
BEGIN REACH 1 - ENHANCEMENT II
10501055106010651070
1075
1
0
8
0
10851050
1055
106010651070
10751080
1050
1055
1060
1065
1050
1055
10601065
1070
1075
ANTIOCH TRIBUTARY
ANTIOCH TRIB C
STA: 386+22
ANTIOCH TRIB C
END REACH 1 - ENHANCEMENT II
301+00302+00
303+00
386+
2
2
385+
0
0
386+
0
0
LOG SILL (TYP)
SET 3 LOG SILLS TO
PROTECT WETLANDS GRADE
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Chicken Trib.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaChicken Tributary 1Stream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.4.1December 12, 2018Sheet Index N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.4.1
2.4.2
2.4.3
2.4.4
2.4.5
2.4.6
2.4.7
CHIC
K
E
N
T
RI
B
1
A
CHICKEN TRIB 1SF F
ISH
ING
CREEK
ENHANCEMENT II REACH TREATMENTS:
1.EXCLUDE CATTLE
2.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION
3.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEE
PLANTING PLANS
4.CHANNEL REALIGNMENT AS SHOWN
1015
1020
1025
1030
1015
1020
1025
1030
400+00 400+50 401+00 401+50 402+00 402+50 403+00 403+50 404+00 404+20
-1.4%STA = 400+37ELEV = 1022.06STA = 401+47ELEV = 1020.55-1.4%
EXISTING GROUND
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEXXXXXXXXXXJAMES M. WILLIAMSCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
STA: 400+07
CHICKEN TRIBUTARY 1
BEGIN REACH 1 - ENHANCEMENT II
STA: 400+67
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
INTERNAL CROSSING
STA: 401+39
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
INTERNAL CROSSING
CHICKEN TRIBUTARY 1
1020
1020
1025
1025
1030
1030
1035
1035
1040
1040
1045
1045
1050
1050
1055
1055
1025
10
3
0
10351045
EXISTING ABANDONED 48" CMP
TO BE REMOVEDEXISTING 48" CMP
TO BE REMOVED
400+07
4
0
1
+
0
0
STABILIZE CONCENTRATED FLOW
REMOVE EXISTING FENCE
WITHIN CONSERVATION EASEMENT (TYP)MATCH LINE - STA 404+20
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Chicken Trib.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaChicken Tributary 1Stream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.4.2December 12, 2018Sheet Index N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.4.1
2.4.2
2.4.3
2.4.4
2.4.5
2.4.6
2.4.7
CHIC
K
E
N
T
RI
B
1
A
CHICKEN TRIB 1SF F
ISH
ING
CREEK
ENHANCEMENT II REACH TREATMENTS:
1.EXCLUDE CATTLE
2.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION
3.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEE
PLANTING PLANS
1005
1010
1015
1020
1005
1010
1015
1020
404+20 404+50 405+00 405+50 406+00 406+50 407+00 407+50 408+00 408+50
-0.5%STA = 407+60ELEV = 1009.99STA = 408+31ELEV = 1009.64STA = 408+47ELEV = 1007.78EXISTING GROUND PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE CECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
C
E
CHICKEN TRIBUTARY 1 CHICKEN TRIB 1ASTA: 407+60
CHICKEN TRIBUTARY 1
END REACH 1 - ENHANCEMENT II
BEGIN REACH 2 - RESTORATION
1045
1050
1055
101510201025
103010351040
1045
1050
1055
1060
1065
1015
1020
1025
1030
1035
1040
1045 10101
0
1
0
1015
1020
1025
1030
1035
408+00
409+00433+041
0
1
0
MATCH LINE - STA 404+20MATCH LINE - STA 408+50
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Chicken Trib.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaChicken Tributary 1Stream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.4.3December 12, 2018Sheet Index N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.4.1
2.4.2
2.4.3
2.4.4
2.4.5
2.4.6
2.4.7
CHIC
K
E
N
T
RI
B
1
A
CHICKEN TRIB 1SF F
ISH
ING
CREEK
1003
1005
1010
1015
1020
1003
1005
1010
1015
1020
408+50 409+00 409+50 410+00 410+50 411+00 411+50 412+00 412+50 413+00
-1.0%
-2.6%
-2.5%
-2.8%
-2.1%
-2.0%STA = 408+63ELEV = 1007.78STA = 408+80ELEV = 1009.64STA = 409+35ELEV = 1009.09STA = 409+54ELEV = 1005.71STA = 409+72ELEV = 1005.71STA = 409+91ELEV = 1009.09STA = 410+21ELEV = 1008.32STA = 410+35ELEV = 1005.95STA = 410+49ELEV = 1005.95STA = 410+64ELEV = 1008.32STA = 410+86ELEV = 1007.75STA = 411+03ELEV = 1005.61STA = 411+20ELEV = 1005.61STA = 411+37ELEV = 1007.75STA = 411+67ELEV = 1006.90STA = 411+77ELEV = 1005.55STA = 411+88ELEV = 1005.55STA = 411+98ELEV = 1006.90STA = 412+32ELEV = 1006.20STA = 412+42ELEV = 1003.89STA = 412+52ELEV = 1003.89STA = 412+62ELEV = 1006.20EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
XXXXXXXXXX
OHEOHEOHEOHEOHECECECECECECECECECECECEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CHICKEN TRIBUTARY 1STA: 407+60
CHICKEN TRIBUTARY 1
END REACH 1 - ENHANCEMENT II
BEGIN REACH 2 - RESTORATION
STA: 412+64
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
INTERNAL CROSSING
END REACH 1 - ENHANCEMENT II1
0
1
0
101
0
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
1010
10101010
24" CMP CULVERT
TO BE REPLACED
AND RELOCATED
E
X
I
S
T
ING

FA
RM

RO
AD
408+00
4
0
9
+
0
0
410+00411+00
412+00 413+001010
1010
1010
1020
MATCH L
INE

-
STA
408+50MATCH
L
INE

-
STA
413+00
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Chicken Trib.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaChicken Tributary 1Stream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.4.4December 12, 2018Sheet Index N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.4.1
2.4.2
2.4.3
2.4.4
2.4.5
2.4.6
2.4.7
CHIC
K
E
N
T
RI
B
1
A
CHICKEN TRIB 1SF F
ISH
ING
CREEK
995
1000
1005
1010
1015
995
1000
1005
1010
1015
413+00 413+50 414+00 414+50 415+00 415+50 416+00 416+20STA = 413+28ELEV = 1004.87STA = 413+40ELEV = 1001.37STA = 414+19ELEV = 1003.87STA = 414+32ELEV = 1001.60STA = 414+92ELEV = 1003.24STA = 415+00
ELEV = 1001.53STA = 413+52ELEV = 1001.37STA = 413+63ELEV = 1004.87STA = 414+45ELEV = 1001.60STA = 414+58ELEV = 1003.87STA = 415+07
ELEV = 1001.53STA = 415+15ELEV = 1003.24STA = 415+56ELEV = 1002.31EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
-1.8%
-1.9%
-2.3%XXXXXXXXX X X X
X XX XXX
XXX
X
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE XXXXOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECECECECESF FISHING CREEK
CHICK
E
N
T
RI
B
U
T
A
R
Y
1
STA: 412+64
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
INTERNAL CROSSING
STA: 413+25
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
INTERNAL CROSSING
EXISTING FARM ROADSTA: 415+56
CHICKEN TRIBUTARY 1
END REACH 2 - RESTORATION
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
138+00139+00140+00
415+56
412
+
0
0
413+00
41
4
+
0
0
415+00
1
0
1
0
10
1
0
1
0
2
0
10051010
1015
1020
1025
103
0
1000
100010051005
REMOVED EXISTING FENCE
IN CONSERVATION EASEMENT
MATCH LINE - STA 413+00
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Chicken Trib.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaChicken Trib 1AStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.4.5December 12, 2018Sheet Index
N
0'5'10'15'
(VERTICAL)
2.4.1
2.4.2
2.4.3
2.4.4
2.4.5
2.4.6
2.4.7
CHIC
K
E
N
T
RI
B
1
A
CHICKEN TRIB 1SF F
ISH
ING
CREEK
ENHANCEMENT II REACH TREATMENTS:
1.EXCLUDE CATTLE
2.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION
3.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEE
PLANTING PLANS
1055
1060
1065
1070
1075
1080
1085
1055
1060
1065
1070
1075
1080
1085
420+00 420+50 421+00 421+50 422+00 422+50 423+00 423+50 424+00 424+20
EXISTING GROUND
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CHI
C
K
E
N

T
R
I
B

1
A
STA: 422+49
CHICKEN TRIB 1A
BEGIN REACH 1 - ENHANCEMENT II
420+0
0
421+00
422+00
423+00
424+0
0
1065
1070
107510801085
1090
1095
106
5
1
0
7
0
107
5108
0108
5
1090
MATCH LINE - STA 424+20
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Chicken Trib.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaChicken Trib 1AStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.4.6December 12, 2018Sheet Index
N
2.4.1
2.4.2
2.4.3
2.4.4
2.4.5
2.4.6
2.4.7
CHIC
K
E
N
T
RI
B
1
A
CHICKEN TRIB 1SF F
ISH
ING
CREEK
0'5'10'15'
(VERTICAL)
ENHANCEMENT II REACH TREATMENTS:
1.EXCLUDE CATTLE
2.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION
3.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEE
PLANTING PLANS
1040
1045
1050
1055
1060
1065
1070
1040
1045
1050
1055
1060
1065
1070
424+20 424+50 425+00 425+50 426+00 426+50 427+00 427+50 428+00 428+50
EXISTING GROUND
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CHICKEN TRIB 1A
1060
106
0
1065
1065
1070
107
0
1075
1
0
7
5
1080
1085
1050
1050
1055
1055
1060
1060
1065
1065
1070
1070
1075
424+00425+00
426+00
427+00
428+00
1065
MATCH LINE - STA 424+20MATCH LINE - STA 428+50
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Chicken Trib.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaChicken Trib 1AStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.4.7December 12, 2018Sheet Index
N
2.4.1
2.4.2
2.4.3
2.4.4
2.4.5
2.4.6
2.4.7
CHIC
K
E
N
T
RI
B
1
A
CHICKEN TRIB 1SF F
ISH
ING
CREEK
0'5'10'15'
(VERTICAL)
ENHANCEMENT II REACH TREATMENTS:
1.EXCLUDE CATTLE
2.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION
3.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEE
PLANTING PLANS
1010
1015
1020
1025
1030
1035
1040
1045
1050
1010
1015
1020
1025
1030
1035
1040
1045
1050
428+50 429+00 429+50 430+00 430+50 431+00 431+50 432+00 432+50 433+00 433+20
EXISTING GROUND
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECHICKE
N
T
R
I
B
1
A
STA: 433+04
CHICKEN TRIB 1A
END REACH 1 - ENHANCEMENT II
1015
1
0
2
0
10251030103510401010
1015102010251030104010451050
1055
1060
1065
1070
1075
10
2
5
10
3
0
10
3
5
104
0
1045
1050
1055
1060
1065
1070
4
3
3
+
0
4
429+00
430+00
431+00
432+0
0
MATCH LINE - STA 428+50
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Chicken Trib.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaRobin Hill TributaryStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.5.1December 12, 2018Sheet Index N2.5.1
2.5.2
2.5.3
2.5.5
2.5.4
2.6.1
2.6.2
SF FISHI
N
G

C
R
E
E
K
OAK
T
RI
B
U
T
A
R
Y
ROBIN HILL
TRIBUTARY
0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
1013
1015
1020
1025
1030
1035
1013
1015
1020
1025
1030
1035
500+50 501+00 501+50 502+00 502+50 503+00 503+50 504+00 504+20
STA = 504+05
ELEV = 1016.04
STA = 504+08
ELEV = 1016.04STA = 504+16ELEV = 1017.10STA = 501+65
ELEV = 1022.38
STA = 501+68
ELEV = 1022.38 STA = 501+72ELEV = 1023.77STA = 502+01ELEV = 1022.68STA = 502+04
ELEV = 1020.46
STA = 502+08
ELEV = 1020.46 STA = 502+11ELEV = 1022.68STA = 502+23ELEV = 1022.23STA = 502+26
ELEV = 1020.75
STA = 502+29
ELEV = 1020.75 STA = 502+33ELEV = 1022.13STA = 502+48ELEV = 1021.51STA = 502+53
ELEV = 1019.56
STA = 502+58
ELEV = 1019.56 STA = 502+64ELEV = 1021.21STA = 502+72ELEV = 1020.87STA = 502+76
ELEV = 1019.40
STA = 502+80
ELEV = 1019.40STA = 502+84ELEV = 1020.77STA = 503+14ELEV = 1019.75STA = 503+21
ELEV = 1017.25
STA = 503+29
ELEV = 1017.25STA = 503+36ELEV = 1019.35STA = 503+58ELEV = 1018.55STA = 504+01ELEV = 1017.40STA = 503+64
ELEV = 1017.13
STA = 503+70
ELEV = 1017.13STA = 503+75ELEV = 1018.35STA = 501+37ELEV = 1024.67STA = 501+61ELEV = 1023.77STA = 501+47ELEV = 1024.17STA = 501+43
ELEV = 1023.17
STA = 501+45
ELEV = 1023.17
STA = 500+71
ELEV = 1030.12
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED BANKFULL
PROPOSED GRADEEND ROCK CASCADEBEGIN ROCK CASCADE
-3.8
%
-3.9
%
-4.0
%
-3.9
%
-3.5%
-3.6
%
-3.8
%
-2.8%XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEC
E
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
STA: 500+79
ROBIN HILL TRIBUTARY
BEGIN REACH 1 - RESTORATION
1030
1035
1040
1045
1050
1055
106
0
1030
1035
1
0
4
0
1
0
4
5
1035104010451050105510601065
1020
102
5
103
010351040
1020
1025
1030
1035
1040
1045
ROBIN H
I
L
L

T
R
I
B
U
T
A
R
Y
RO
B
IN
H
I
L
L

T
R
I
B

B
500+00
501+00 502+0
0
503
+
0
0
504+00
5
7
8
+
2
8578+00PROPOSED ROCK CASCADE
MATCH LINE - STA 504+20
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Chicken Trib.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaRobin Hill TributaryStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.5.2December 12, 2018Sheet Index N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.5.1
2.5.2
2.5.3
2.5.5
2.5.4
2.6.1
2.6.2
SF FISHI
N
G

C
R
E
E
K
OAK
T
RI
B
U
T
A
R
Y
ROBIN HILL
TRIBUTARY
1000
1005
1010
1015
1020
1000
1005
1010
1015
1020
504+20 504+50 505+00 505+50 506+00 506+50 507+00 507+50 508+00 508+50
-3.3%
-3.3%
-3.6
%
-4.4
%
-4.0
%
-3.8
%
-3.7
%
-2.4%
STA = 507+90
ELEV = 1004.07 STA = 508+08ELEV = 1004.07STA = 508+26ELEV = 1005.86STA = 507+72ELEV = 1006.56STA = 507+19
ELEV = 1006.43
STA = 507+29
ELEV = 1006.44STA = 507+39ELEV = 1007.66STA = 507+08
ELEV = 1007.96
STA = 507+01ELEV = 1008.20STA = 506+86
ELEV = 1006.59
STA = 506+94
ELEV = 1006.59
STA = 506+78
ELEV = 1008.50
STA = 506+53
ELEV = 1006.65 STA = 506+62ELEV = 1006.65STA = 506+72ELEV = 1008.74STA = 505+30
ELEV = 1011.68
STA = 505+35
ELEV = 1011.68 STA = 505+40ELEV = 1013.89STA = 505+81ELEV = 1012.61STA = 505+54ELEV = 1013.32STA = 505+59
ELEV = 1011.90
STA = 505+64
ELEV = 1011.90STA = 505+69ELEV = 1013.12STA = 505+26ELEV = 1013.99STA = 504+81
ELEV = 1013.00
STA = 504+87
ELEV = 1013.00
STA = 504+92
ELEV = 1015.28
STA = 504+76
ELEV = 1015.48
STA = 504+63
ELEV = 1013.97
STA = 504+69
ELEV = 1013.97
STA = 504+57
ELEV = 1015.88
STA = 504+20
ELEV = 1015.15
STA = 504+25
ELEV = 1015.15
STA = 504+30
ELEV = 1016.90
STA = 506+16ELEV = 1009.86STA = 506+43ELEV = 1008.94STA = 506+26ELEV = 1009.36STA = 506+21
ELEV = 1008.36
STA = 506+23
ELEV = 1008.36
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED BANKFULL
PROPOSED GRADEBEGIN ROCK CASCADEEND ROCK CASCADEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECECECE CECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
1020
1025
1030
ROBIN HILL TRIBUTARY
RO
B
IN
H
I
L
L

T
R
I
B
A
STA: 507+84
ROBIN HILL TRIBUTARY
END REACH 1 - RESTORATION
BEGIN REACH 2 - RESTORATION
100510101015102010251025
1010
10
1
5
10
2
0
1
0
2
5
1030
10
3
5
1010
1015
1020
1025E
X
I
S
T
ING

FA
RM

ROAD
504+00 505+00
506
+
0
0
50
7
+
0
0
508+00551+00552+00
EXIS
T
I
N
G

2
4
"

C
M
P
TO B
E

R
E
M
O
V
E
D
PROPOSED ROCK CASCADE
MATCH LINE - STA 504+20MATCH LINE - STA 508+50
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Chicken Trib.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaRobin Hill TributaryStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.5.3December 12, 2018Sheet Index
N
0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.5.1
2.5.2
2.5.3
2.5.5
2.5.4
2.6.1
2.6.2
SF FISHI
N
G

C
R
E
E
K
OAK
T
RI
B
U
T
A
R
Y
ROBIN HILL
TRIBUTARY
990
995
1000
1005
1010
990
995
1000
1005
1010
508+50 509+00 509+50 510+00 510+50 511+00 511+50 512+00 512+35
STA = 512+35
ELEV = 997.17
STA = 511+75
ELEV = 997.19 STA = 511+87ELEV = 997.19STA = 511+99ELEV = 998.44STA = 511+63ELEV = 998.94STA = 511+51ELEV = 999.22STA = 511+42ELEV = 997.77STA = 511+32ELEV = 997.77STA = 511+23ELEV = 999.22STA = 510+72ELEV = 997.69STA = 510+82ELEV = 997.69STA = 510+92ELEV = 999.52STA = 510+63ELEV = 999.52STA = 510+12ELEV = 997.31STA = 510+25ELEV = 997.31STA = 510+38ELEV = 999.76STA = 509+49ELEV = 1000.60STA = 509+99ELEV = 999.76STA = 509+56
ELEV = 998.52
STA = 509+62
ELEV = 998.52 STA = 509+69ELEV = 1000.60STA = 509+10
ELEV = 999.24
STA = 509+16
ELEV = 999.24 STA = 509+23ELEV = 1001.59STA = 509+02ELEV = 1002.29STA = 508+77ELEV = 1003.43STA = 508+81
ELEV = 1001.83
STA = 508+84
ELEV = 1001.83 STA = 508+88ELEV = 1003.03-3.0%
-2.4%
-1.0%
-1.0%
-3.8
%
-2.8%
-5.1
%
-4.8
%
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECECEROBIN HILL TRIBUTARY
S
F

F
I
S
H
I
N
G

C
R
E
E
K
STA: 507+84
ROBIN HILL TRIBUTARY
END REACH 1 - RESTORATION
BEGIN REACH 2 - RESTORATION
STA: 512+35
ROBIN HILL TRIBUTARY
END REACH 2 - RESTORATION
10001005101010151
0
2
0
1
0
2
5 100510101015102010251030
9951000100010001000100010001010
1015
EXI
S
T
I
N
G

F
A
R
M

R
O
A
D
150+001
5
1
+
0
0 152+00508+
0
0
509+
0
0 510+00511+00
512+00552+00
EXISTING 24" CMP
TO BE REMOVEDMATCH LINE - STA 508+50
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Chicken Trib.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaRobin Hill Trib AStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.5.4December 12, 2018Sheet Index
N
0'5'10'15'
(VERTICAL)
2.5.1
2.5.2
2.5.3
2.5.5
2.5.4
2.6.1
2.6.2
SF FISHI
N
G

C
R
E
E
K
OAK
T
RI
B
U
T
A
R
Y
ROBIN HILL
TRIBUTARY
1000
1005
1010
1015
1020
1025
1030
1000
1005
1010
1015
1020
1025
1030
550+00 550+50 551+00 551+50 552+00 552+20
-2.6%
-4.1%
-4.5%
STA = 550+00
ELEV = 1022.59 STA = 550+14ELEV = 1020.65STA = 550+26ELEV = 1020.34STA = 550+29
ELEV = 1017.05 STA = 550+35ELEV = 1017.27STA = 550+49ELEV = 1017.23STA = 550+62ELEV = 1017.85STA = 552+17
ELEV = 1005.15STA = 551+48ELEV = 1008.55STA = 552+09ELEV = 1006.44STA = 551+18
ELEV = 1008.73
STA = 551+25
ELEV = 1008.73 STA = 551+28ELEV = 1009.38STA = 551+48
ELEV = 1007.83
STA = 551+56
ELEV = 1007.83 STA = 551+60ELEV = 1008.39STA = 551+60
ELEV = 1007.50
STA = 551+67
ELEV = 1007.50STA = 551+71ELEV = 1008.09STA = 551+71
ELEV = 1006.86
STA = 551+84
ELEV = 1006.86STA = 551+90ELEV = 1007.29STA = 551+18ELEV = 1009.58EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
BEGIN ROCK CASCADEEND ROCK CASCADEXXXXXXXXXXCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECECE1
0
0
5
101
0
1015
1020
1025
1010101510201010101510201025STA: 550+62
ROBIN HILL TRIB A
BEGIN REACH 1 - RESTORATION
10
201025
1030103510401045ROBIN HILL TRIBUTARYROBIN HILL TRIB A
STA: 552+17
ROBIN HILL TRIB A
END REACH 1 - RESTORATION
507+00 508+00550+00
55
1
+
0
0 552+00REMOVE EXISTING FENCE
IN CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PROPOSED WETLAND TREATMENT BMP TO BE REMOVED
PROPOSED ROCK CASCADE
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Chicken Trib.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaRobin Hill Trib BStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.5.5December 12, 2018Sheet Index
N
0'5'10'15'
(VERTICAL)
2.5.1
2.5.2
2.5.3
2.5.5
2.5.4
2.6.1
2.6.2
SF FISHI
N
G

C
R
E
E
K
OAK
T
RI
B
U
T
A
R
Y
ROBIN HILL
TRIBUTARY
1020
1025
1030
1035
1040
1045
1050
1055
1060
1065
1070
1075
1080
1085
1020
1025
1030
1035
1040
1045
1050
1055
1060
1065
1070
1075
1080
1085
575+00 575+50 576+00 576+50 577+00 577+50 578+00 578+30STA = 575+93ELEV = 1042.77STA = 578+24ELEV = 1025.57STA = 578+28
ELEV = 1024.50STA = 576+67ELEV = 1035.09STA = 576+52
ELEV = 1035.08
STA = 576+56
ELEV = 1035.08 STA = 576+58ELEV = 1035.65STA = 576+67
ELEV = 1034.25
STA = 576+71
ELEV = 1034.25
STA = 576+73
ELEV = 1034.79
STA = 576+73
ELEV = 1033.88
STA = 576+78
ELEV = 1033.88 STA = 576+80ELEV = 1034.49STA = 576+99ELEV = 1033.21STA = 577+08ELEV = 1032.91STA = 577+00
ELEV = 1032.35
STA = 577+05
ELEV = 1032.35 STA = 577+19ELEV = 1032.13STA = 577+19
ELEV = 1031.18
STA = 577+27
ELEV = 1031.18 STA = 577+30ELEV = 1031.63STA = 577+45ELEV = 1030.66STA = 577+45
ELEV = 1029.73
STA = 577+53
ELEV = 1029.73 STA = 577+57ELEV = 1030.05STA = 577+64
ELEV = 1029.75
STA = 577+57
ELEV = 1029.21
STA = 577+62
ELEV = 1029.21STA = 576+44ELEV = 1036.43STA = 577+79ELEV = 1028.82STA = 577+79
ELEV = 1027.85
STA = 577+87
ELEV = 1027.85STA = 577+91ELEV = 1028.22STA = 576+52
ELEV = 1035.95
STA = 576+49
ELEV = 1036.13
STA = 576+46
ELEV = 1035.26
STA = 576+48
ELEV = 1035.26
EXISTING GROUND
BEGIN ROCK CASCADEEND ROCK CASCADE-8.0%
-6.6%
-6.5%
-7.0%
-6.6%
-6.3%
-6.7%
PROPOSED BANKFULL
PROPOSED GRADE
XXXXXOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEXXXXXXXXOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECE10301035104010451050
1055103010351
0
3
5
1
0
4
0
1
0
4
5
1050105510601065ROBIN HILL TRIB BSTA: 575+93
ROBIN HILL TRIB B
BEGIN REACH 1 - RESTORATION
STA: 578+28
ROBIN HILL TRIB B
END REACH 1 - RESTORATION
1035
1040
1045
1050105510601065107010751080
501+00502+00578+28
575+00
5
7
6
+
0
0
577+0
0
578+00
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Chicken Trib.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaOak TributaryStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.6.1December 12, 2018Sheet IndexN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.5.1
2.5.2
2.5.3
2.5.5
2.5.4
2.6.1
2.6.2
SF FISHI
N
G

C
R
E
E
K
OAK
T
RI
B
U
T
A
R
Y
ROBIN HILL
TRIBUTARY
995
1000
1005
1010
1015
995
1000
1005
1010
1015
600+00 600+50 601+00 601+50 602+00 602+50 603+00 603+50 604+00 604+20
PROPOSED BANKFULL
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED GRADE
-7.
1
%
-2.1%
-4.8
%
-3.2%
-2.3%
-3.0%
-3.1%
-5.
5
%
-4.7
%
-5.
1
%
STA = 600+89
ELEV = 1009.08
STA = 600+94
ELEV = 1007.67
STA = 600+96
ELEV = 1008.09
STA = 601+00
ELEV = 1008.18
STA = 601+01
ELEV = 1007.66
STA = 601+03
ELEV = 1008.12
STA = 601+28ELEV = 1007.58STA = 601+34
ELEV = 1005.96
STA = 601+40
ELEV = 1005.96 STA = 601+46ELEV = 1007.33STA = 601+53
ELEV = 1006.99
STA = 601+59
ELEV = 1005.70
STA = 601+64
ELEV = 1005.70 STA = 601+69ELEV = 1006.86STA = 601+79ELEV = 1006.54STA = 601+81
ELEV = 1006.00
STA = 601+84
ELEV = 1006.00
STA = 601+86
ELEV = 1006.40
STA = 602+01ELEV = 1006.06STA = 602+08
ELEV = 1004.31
STA = 602+14
ELEV = 1004.31 STA = 602+22ELEV = 1005.75STA = 602+44ELEV = 1005.11STA = 602+48
ELEV = 1004.30
STA = 602+52
ELEV = 1004.30 STA = 602+57ELEV = 1005.01STA = 602+61
ELEV = 1004.09
STA = 602+64
ELEV = 1004.09 STA = 602+70ELEV = 1004.72STA = 602+90ELEV = 1004.08STA = 602+96
ELEV = 1002.81
STA = 603+03
ELEV = 1002.81 STA = 603+10ELEV = 1003.96STA = 603+18ELEV = 1003.53STA = 603+23
ELEV = 1002.27
STA = 603+28
ELEV = 1002.27 STA = 603+34ELEV = 1003.46STA = 603+56ELEV = 1002.40STA = 603+64
ELEV = 1001.05
STA = 603+69
ELEV = 1001.05 STA = 603+74ELEV = 1002.16STA = 604+02ELEV = 1000.73STA = 604+09
ELEV = 999.08
STA = 604+16
ELEV = 999.08
OHEOHEOHEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
OAK TRI
B
U
T
A
R
Y10101015
1
0
1
0
STA: 600+71
OAK TRIBUTARY
BEGIN REACH 1 - RESTORATION
1015
10
2
0
1025
10
3
0
10
3
5 1005101010151020
1025
1030
1035104010451050
OAK TRIBUTARY600+00
601
+
0
0
602+00
603+00 604+00
MATCH LINE - STA 604+20
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles Chicken Trib.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaOak TributaryStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.6.2December 12, 2018Sheet IndexN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.5.1
2.5.2
2.5.3
2.5.5
2.5.4
2.6.1
2.6.2
SF FISHI
N
G

C
R
E
E
K
OAK
T
RI
B
U
T
A
R
Y
ROBIN HILL
TRIBUTARY
985
990
995
1000
1005
985
990
995
1000
1005
604+20 604+50 605+00 605+50 606+00 606+50 606+70
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
-2.1%
-2.0%
-2.4%
-4.3
%
-5.
2
%
-2.1%
-2.0%
-2.4%
-4.3
%
STA = 604+25
ELEV = 1000.32 STA = 604+48ELEV = 999.12STA = 604+51
ELEV = 997.92
STA = 604+55
ELEV = 997.92 STA = 604+60ELEV = 998.82STA = 604+64
ELEV = 998.22
STA = 604+68
ELEV = 998.22 STA = 604+73ELEV = 998.73STA = 604+90ELEV = 998.36STA = 605+00ELEV = 996.98STA = 605+10ELEV = 996.98STA = 605+20ELEV = 998.30STA = 605+34ELEV = 998.02STA = 605+42
ELEV = 995.92
STA = 605+50
ELEV = 995.92 STA = 605+57ELEV = 997.76STA = 605+83ELEV = 997.12STA = 605+99ELEV = 995.15STA = 606+14ELEV = 995.15STA = 606+29ELEV = 996.73STA = 606+54ELEV = 995.68CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECESF FISHING CREEKOAK TRIBUTARY995995100010051
0
1
0
10159959
9
5
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
5
101
0
STA: 606+54
OAK TRIBUTARY
END REACH 1 - RESTORATION157+00158+0015
9
+
0
0606+54604+
0
0
605+00
MATCH LINE - STA 604+20
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles WF.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaWest Fork Fishing CreekStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.7.1December 12, 2018Sheet Index N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.7.1
2.7.2
2.7.3
2.7.4
2.7.5
2.7.6
2.7.7
WF FISHING
CREEK
S
F

F
I
SH
INGCREEKSHEW
R
IDGETRIBUTARY TIMBERTRIBUTARY
MAGNOLIATRIBUTARY995
1000
1005
1010
1015
995
1000
1005
1010
1015
700+00 700+50 701+00 701+50 702+00 702+50 703+00 703+50 704+00 704+20
EXISTING GROUND PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
-0.3%-0.3%STA = 703+37ELEV = 997.77STA = 703+78ELEV = 997.77STA = 704+19
ELEV = 1000.44STA = 701+61ELEV = 1000.60STA = 701+70ELEV = 998.14STA = 701+78ELEV = 998.14STA = 701+86ELEV = 1001.10STA = 702+20ELEV = 1001.00STA = 702+96ELEV = 1000.89STA = 702+33ELEV = 998.01STA = 702+46ELEV = 998.01STA = 702+59ELEV = 1001.00XXXXXXXXXOHE
OHE
OHEOHEOHEOHE XXXXXXXOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEWF

F
I
S
H
I
N
G

C
R
E
E
K
MAGNOLIATRIBUTARYSTA: 701+62
WF FISHING CREEK
BEGIN REACH 1 - RESTORATION 10051005
1005
10051005100510051005101010151020699+77 700+
0
0
701+00702+00
703
+
0
0 704+00705+00814+00815+95MA
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

-

S
T
A

7
0
4
+
2
0
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles WF.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaWest Fork Fishing CreekStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.7.2December 12, 2018Sheet Index N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.7.1
2.7.2
2.7.3
2.7.4
2.7.5
2.7.6
2.7.7
WF FISHING
CREEK
S
F

F
I
SH
INGCREEKSHEW
R
IDGETRIBUTARY TIMBERTRIBUTARY
MAGNOLIATRIBUTARY992
995
1000
1005
1010
992
995
1000
1005
1010
704+20 704+50 705+00 705+50 706+00 706+50 707+00 707+50 708+00 708+50708+50
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
-0.3%
-0.5%
-0.4%STA = 705+01ELEV = 1000.19STA = 705+23ELEV = 995.72STA = 705+45ELEV = 995.72STA = 705+67ELEV = 1000.17STA = 706+40ELEV = 999.80STA = 706+52ELEV = 997.95STA = 706+63ELEV = 997.95STA = 706+75ELEV = 999.80STA = 707+67ELEV = 999.43STA = 708+11ELEV = 993.45-0.3%
-0.5%
-0.4%STA = 705+01ELEV = 1000.19STA = 705+23ELEV = 995.72STA = 705+45ELEV = 995.72STA = 705+67ELEV = 1000.17STA = 706+40ELEV = 999.80STA = 706+52ELEV = 997.95STA = 706+63ELEV = 997.95STA = 706+75ELEV = 999.80STA = 707+67ELEV = 999.43STA = 708+11ELEV = 993.45CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEWF FISHING CREEK
1000
1000
1005
1010
1015
1020
1025
1030
100
0
100
0
100510101
0
1
5
1020
10
2
5
704+
0
0 705+00706+00
707+0
0
708+00
709+009
1
2
+
0
0
913+00STA: 708+85
WF FISHING CREEK
END REACH 1 - RESTORATION
BEGIN REACH 2 - RESTORATIONMATCH LINE - STA 704+20MATCH LINE - STA 708+50
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles WF.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaWest Fork Fishing CreekStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.7.3December 12, 2018Sheet Index
N
0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.7.1
2.7.2
2.7.3
2.7.4
2.7.5
2.7.6
2.7.7
WF FISHING
CREEK
S
F

F
I
SH
INGCREEKSHEW
R
IDGETRIBUTARY TIMBERTRIBUTARY
MAGNOLIATRIBUTARY991
995
1000
1005
1010
991
995
1000
1005
1010
708+50 709+00 709+50 710+00 710+50 711+00 711+50 712+00 712+50 713+00
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
-0.5%-0.4%-0.3%-0.5%STA = 708+55ELEV = 993.45STA = 708+82ELEV = 999.40STA = 709+38ELEV = 999.12STA = 709+50ELEV = 996.47STA = 709+55ELEV = 996.47STA = 709+66ELEV = 999.12STA = 710+15ELEV = 998.94STA = 710+30ELEV = 994.64STA = 710+52ELEV = 994.64STA = 710+68ELEV = 998.94STA = 711+25ELEV = 998.76STA = 711+41ELEV = 995.05STA = 711+52ELEV = 995.05STA = 711+66ELEV = 998.76STA = 712+11ELEV = 998.53STA = 712+46ELEV = 991.51STA = 712+80ELEV = 991.51CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEC
E
C
E
C
E
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
WF FISHING C
R
E
E
K
STA: 711+66
WF FISHING CREEK
END REACH 2 - RESTORATION
BEGIN REACH 3 - ENHANCEMENT I
100010001000
1005
10101015
1
0
0
0
10
0
5
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
5
102
0
1025
1030708+00709+00
710+
0
0
711+0
0
712+0
0
7
1
3
+
0
0
913
+
0
0
STA: 708+85
WF FISHING CREEK
END REACH 1 - RESTORATION
BEGIN REACH 2 - RESTORATION
SHE
W

R
I
D
G
E

T
R
I
B
U
T
A
R
Y
MA
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

-

S
T
A

7
0
8
+
5
0
MATCH LINE - STA 713+00
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles WF.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaWest Fork Fishing CreekStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.7.4December 12, 2018Sheet Index
N
0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.7.1
2.7.2
2.7.3
2.7.4
2.7.5
2.7.6
2.7.7
WF FISHING
CREEK
S
F

F
I
SH
INGCREEKSHEW
R
IDGETRIBUTARY TIMBERTRIBUTARY
MAGNOLIATRIBUTARY990
995
1000
1005
990
995
1000
1005
713+00 713+50 714+00 714+50 715+00 715+50 716+00 716+50 717+00 717+50
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
-2.1%
-1.5%
-1.4%
-0.7%
-1.9%STA = 713+14ELEV = 998.43STA = 713+27ELEV = 998.18STA = 713+51ELEV = 995.12STA = 713+76ELEV = 995.12STA = 714+00ELEV = 998.08STA = 714+23ELEV = 997.72STA = 714+39ELEV = 993.32STA = 714+54ELEV = 993.32STA = 714+69ELEV = 997.72STA = 714+85ELEV = 997.49STA = 715+22ELEV = 992.30STA = 715+58ELEV = 992.30STA = 715+95ELEV = 997.49STA = 717+32ELEV = 994.23STA = 716+74ELEV = 996.92STA = 717+14ELEV = 996.15CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEC
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECESAFSAFSAFWF FISHING CREEK
IRONWOOD
TR
IBUTAR
Y
1
0
0
0
99599510001005
1010
1015
1000
10
0
0
1
0
0
0713+00714+00
7
1
5
+
0
0 716+00717+00718+001009+26FILL EXISTING CHANNEL EXISTING 72" CMP
TO BE RELOCATEDMATCH LINE - STA 713+00MATCH

L
INE

-

STA
717+50
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles WF.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaWest Fork Fishing CreekStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.7.5December 12, 2018Sheet Index
N
0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.7.1
2.7.2
2.7.3
2.7.4
2.7.5
2.7.6
2.7.7
WF FISHING
CREEK
S
F

F
I
SH
INGCREEKSHEW
R
IDGETRIBUTARY TIMBERTRIBUTARY
MAGNOLIATRIBUTARY987
990
995
1000
1005
987
990
995
1000
1005
717+50717+50 718+00 718+50 719+00 719+50 720+00 720+50 721+00 721+50 721+80
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
-1.6%
-1.0%
-0.7%
STA = 717+51
ELEV = 994.23STA = 717+69ELEV = 996.15STA = 718+90ELEV = 994.26STA = 719+23ELEV = 990.81STA = 719+56ELEV = 990.81STA = 719+89ELEV = 993.76STA = 720+56ELEV = 993.08STA = 720+67ELEV = 990.82STA = 720+79ELEV = 990.82STA = 720+91ELEV = 993.08STA = 721+56ELEV = 992.62STA = 721+69ELEV = 990.34CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEWF

F
I
S
H
I
N
G

C
R
E
E
K
STA: 717+66
WF FISHING CREEK
END REACH 3 - ENHANCEMENT I
BEGIN REACH 4 - ENHANCEMENT I
995
995
1000
1000
1005
1010
1015
1020
995
995
1000
1000
1005
1010
1015
1020
718+00
719+00
720
+
0
0
721+00 722+001009+26IRONWOOD TRIBUTARYSTA: 718+02
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
INTERNAL CROSSING
STA: 718+62
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
INTERNAL CROSSING
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
EXISTING 72" CMP
TO BE RELOCATED
PROPOSED DOUBLE
72" CMP CULVERT.
USE EXISTING CULVERT FOR
ONE SIDE OF DOUBLE CULVERTMATCH LINE - STA 717+50MATCH LINE - STA 721+80
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles WF.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaWest Fork Fishing CreekStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.7.6December 12, 2018Sheet Index
N
0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.7.1
2.7.2
2.7.3
2.7.4
2.7.5
2.7.6
2.7.7
WF FISHING
CREEK
S
F

F
I
SH
INGCREEKSHEW
R
IDGETRIBUTARY TIMBERTRIBUTARY
MAGNOLIATRIBUTARY985
990
995
1000
1005
985
990
995
1000
1005
721+80 722+00 722+50 723+00 723+50 724+00 724+50 725+00 725+50 726+00 726+30
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
-1.1%-1.1%-0.5%-1.3%-0.7%
-0.8%STA = 721+82ELEV = 990.34STA = 721+95ELEV = 992.62STA = 722+12ELEV = 992.43STA = 722+23ELEV = 990.14STA = 722+33ELEV = 990.14STA = 722+43ELEV = 992.43STA = 722+58ELEV = 992.27STA = 722+65
ELEV = 989.99
STA = 722+71
ELEV = 989.99STA = 722+77ELEV = 992.27STA = 723+14ELEV = 992.07STA = 723+55ELEV = 992.07STA = 723+73ELEV = 991.85STA = 724+00ELEV = 991.85STA = 724+31ELEV = 991.61STA = 724+46ELEV = 988.39STA = 724+61ELEV = 988.39STA = 724+76ELEV = 991.61STA = 725+33ELEV = 991.16STA = 725+66ELEV = 987.90STA = 725+99ELEV = 987.90CECECECECECECECECECECEC
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEWF FISHI
N
G
C
R
E
E
K
TIMBER TRIBU
T
A
R
Y
STA: 724+76
WF FISHING CREEK
END REACH 4 - ENHANCEMENT I
BEGIN REACH 5 - ENHANCEMENT I
995995100010001005101010159
9
0
990
99
5
99
5
1
0
0
0
10
0
5
10
1
0
10
1
5
102
0
102
5
990
9
9
0
995
722+00723+00
724+00
7
2
5
+
0
0
726+00MATCH L
INE

-
STA
721+80MATCH LINE - STA 726+30
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles WF.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaWest Fork Fishing CreekStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.7.7December 12, 2018N
0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
983
985
990
995
1000
983
985
990
995
1000
726+30 726+50 727+00 727+50 728+00 728+50 729+00 729+50 730+00 730+50 731+00 731+50 731+75
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
-0.9%
-1.6%-0.9%
-0.6%
-1.5%
-2.2%STA = 726+32ELEV = 991.16STA = 727+08ELEV = 990.51STA = 727+25ELEV = 987.33STA = 727+41ELEV = 987.33STA = 727+57ELEV = 990.51STA = 727+65
ELEV = 990.38
STA = 727+76ELEV = 988.15STA = 727+88ELEV = 988.15STA = 727+99ELEV = 990.38STA = 728+35ELEV = 990.06STA = 728+85ELEV = 990.06STA = 729+81ELEV = 989.51STA = 730+26ELEV = 989.51STA = 730+57ELEV = 989.05STA = 730+77ELEV = 985.75STA = 730+97ELEV = 985.75STA = 731+18ELEV = 989.05STA = 731+61ELEV = 988.11CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECESF FISHING CREEKWF FISHING CREEK
STA: 731+71
WF FISHING CREEK
END REACH 5 - ENHANCEMENT I
167+001
6
8
+
0
0169+00727+0
0
728+00
729+00
730+00
731+00
990
9951000
10051010
1015
1020
1025 99099099099
0
995
100
0
10
0
5
10
1
0MATCH LINE - STA 726+30
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles West.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaMagnolia TributaryStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.8.1December 12, 2018Sheet Index N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.8.1
2.9.1
2.10.1
2.10.2
2.11.1
2.11.2
IRONWOODTRIBUTARYMAGNOLIATRIBUTARYSHEW RIDGETRIBUTARYT
IM
BER
TR
I
BU
TARY
SF FISHINGCREEK997
1000
1005
1010
1015
997
1000
1005
1010
1015
811+00 811+50 812+00 812+50 813+00 813+50 814+00 814+50 815+00 815+50 816+00
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
-2.9%
-3.2%
-2.2%
-1.4%
-2.6%
-3.0%
-3.5
%STA = 811+51ELEV = 1007.62STA = 811+86ELEV = 1008.42STA = 811+96ELEV = 1006.85STA = 812+06ELEV = 1006.85STA = 812+17ELEV = 1008.29STA = 812+28ELEV = 1007.92STA = 812+38ELEV = 1006.86STA = 812+48ELEV = 1006.86STA = 812+58ELEV = 1007.77STA = 812+80ELEV = 1007.27STA = 812+91ELEV = 1005.50STA = 813+02ELEV = 1005.50STA = 813+12ELEV = 1007.10STA = 813+64ELEV = 1006.36STA = 813+70
ELEV = 1005.03
STA = 813+76
ELEV = 1005.03STA = 813+82ELEV = 1006.24STA = 813+94ELEV = 1005.94STA = 814+13ELEV = 1004.03STA = 814+32ELEV = 1004.03STA = 814+50ELEV = 1005.65STA = 814+89ELEV = 1004.50STA = 815+07ELEV = 1002.66STA = 815+25ELEV = 1002.66STA = 815+42ELEV = 1004.15STA = 815+95ELEV = 1002.30STA = 811+69ELEV = 1008.93STA = 811+69ELEV = 1008.93XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXOHEOHEOHEOHEXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
OUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
C
E
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
1015 100510051010101510201025
1030
1035
MAG
N
O
L
I
A

T
R
I
B
U
T
A
R
Y
WF FISHING CREEKSTA: 811+51
MAGNOLIA TRIBUTARY
END REACH 1 - PRESERVATION
BEGIN REACH 2 - ENHANCEMENT I
STA: 815+95
MAGNOLIA TRIBUTARY
END REACH 2 - ENHANCEMENT I
REMOVE EXISTING FENCE
IN CONSERVATION EASEMENT
811+00
812+00
813+00
814+00
815+00815+95
70
2
+
0
0
703+00FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles West.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaShew Ridge TributaryStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.9.1December 12, 2018Sheet Index
N
2.8.1
2.9.1
2.10.1
2.10.2
2.11.1
2.11.2
IRONWOODTRIBUTARYMAGNOLIATRIBUTARYSHEW RIDGETRIBUTARYT
IM
BER
TR
I
BU
TARY
SF FISHINGCREEK0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
995
1000
1005
1010
995
1000
1005
1010
910+00 910+50 911+00 911+50 912+00 912+50 913+00 913+50
-4.2
%
-3.4%
-0.7%
-0.8%
-0.8%STA = 910+34ELEV = 1006.19STA = 910+58ELEV = 1005.18STA = 910+66
ELEV = 1002.47
STA = 910+71
ELEV = 1002.47 STA = 910+79ELEV = 1004.66STA = 910+95ELEV = 1004.15STA = 911+03ELEV = 1000.43STA = 911+57ELEV = 1003.31STA = 911+71ELEV = 999.18STA = 911+86ELEV = 999.18STA = 911+99ELEV = 1003.02STA = 912+42ELEV = 1002.68STA = 912+59ELEV = 999.93STA = 912+74ELEV = 999.93STA = 912+89ELEV = 1002.43STA = 913+44ELEV = 1002.00STA = 911+09ELEV = 1003.65STA = 911+09ELEV = 1003.65EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED BANKFULL
PROPOSED GRADE
CECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
WF FISHING CREEKSTA: 910+34
SHEW TRIBUTARY
END REACH 1 - PRESERVATION
BEGIN REACH 2 - RESTORATION
STA: 913+44
SHEW TRIBUTARY
END REACH 2 - RESTORATION
SHE
W

R
I
D
G
E

T
R
I
B
U
T
A
R
Y
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
5
102
0
10
2
5
103
0
103
5
104
0
104
5
1050
1055
1
0
0
0
10051010101510201025103010351040
1045
708+00710+00913+44
911+00
912+00913+00FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles West.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaIronwood TributaryStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.10.1December 12, 2018Sheet Index N0'5'10'15'
(VERTICAL)
2.8.1
2.9.1
2.10.1
2.10.2
2.11.1
2.11.2
IRONWOODTRIBUTARYMAGNOLIATRIBUTARYSHEW RIDGETRIBUTARYT
IM
BER
TR
I
BU
TARY
SF FISHINGCREEK1020
1025
1030
1035
1040
1045
1050
1055
1060
1020
1025
1030
1035
1040
1045
1050
1055
1060
1000+00 1000+50 1001+00 1001+50 1002+00 1002+50 1003+00 1003+50 1004+00 1004+50STA = 1001+17ELEV = 1047.41STA = 1001+95ELEV = 1037.77STA = 1003+61ELEV = 1029.38STA = 1001+26ELEV = 1046.99STA = 1001+26ELEV = 1046.99STA = 1004+47ELEV = 1026.76STA = 1004+47ELEV = 1026.76STA = 1004+28
ELEV = 1026.01
STA = 1004+31
ELEV = 1026.01 STA = 1004+34ELEV = 1027.27STA = 1004+34ELEV = 1027.27STA = 1004+24ELEV = 1027.47STA = 1004+24ELEV = 1027.47STA = 1003+76ELEV = 1028.89STA = 1003+85
ELEV = 1026.66
STA = 1003+95
ELEV = 1026.66 STA = 1004+04ELEV = 1028.11STA = 1004+04ELEV = 1028.11-13
.
4
%
-5.1%
-5.0%
-4.0%
-3.2%
-3.3%
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED BANKFULL
PROPOSED GRADEBEGIN ROCK CASCADEEND ROCK CASCADEXXXXXXXXXXOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEXXXOUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
IRONWOOD TRIBUTARY
STA: 1001+94
IRONWOOD TRIBUTARY
BEGIN REACH 1 - RESTORATION
10501
0
5
5
1
0
6
0
10
6
5
1
0
7
0 103510401045
1050
1055
10
4
0
1045
1050
DEBRIS PILE
TO BE REMOVED
1000+
0
0
1000+
0
0
1001+0
0
1002+
0
0
1003+00
100
4
+
0
0
REMOVE EXISTING FENCE
IN CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PROPOSED WETLAND TREATMENT BMP
MATCH LINE - STA 1004+50
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles West.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaIronwood TributaryStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.10.2December 12, 2018Sheet Index N0'5'10'15'
(VERTICAL)
2.8.1
2.9.1
2.10.1
2.10.2
2.11.1
2.11.2
IRONWOODTRIBUTARYMAGNOLIATRIBUTARYSHEW RIDGETRIBUTARYT
IM
BER
TR
I
BU
TARY
SF FISHINGCREEK995
1000
1005
1010
1015
1020
1025
1030
1035
1040
995
1000
1005
1010
1015
1020
1025
1030
1035
1040
1004+50 1005+00 1005+50 1006+00 1006+50 1007+00 1007+50 1008+00 1008+50 1009+00 1009+20STA = 1007+19ELEV = 1014.75STA = 1007+12ELEV = 1016.94STA = 1007+14
ELEV = 1016.10
STA = 1007+15
ELEV = 1016.10
STA = 1006+85
ELEV = 1016.17
STA = 1006+88
ELEV = 1016.17 STA = 1006+92ELEV = 1018.21STA = 1006+92ELEV = 1018.21STA = 1006+47ELEV = 1020.06STA = 1006+40
ELEV = 1017.80
STA = 1006+42
ELEV = 1017.80
STA = 1006+42
ELEV = 1017.80 STA = 1006+37ELEV = 1020.31STA = 1006+37ELEV = 1020.31STA = 1005+88
ELEV = 1020.96
STA = 1005+91
ELEV = 1020.95 STA = 1005+94ELEV = 1022.12STA = 1006+08ELEV = 1021.49STA = 1006+14
ELEV = 1020.03 STA = 1006+20ELEV = 1021.12STA = 1006+20ELEV = 1021.12STA = 1005+48
ELEV = 1021.91
STA = 1005+52
ELEV = 1021.91 STA = 1005+57ELEV = 1023.60STA = 1005+42ELEV = 1023.97STA = 1005+42ELEV = 1023.97STA = 1005+17ELEV = 1024.77STA = 1005+25
ELEV = 1022.95 STA = 1005+31ELEV = 1024.36STA = 1005+31ELEV = 1024.36STA = 1004+53ELEV = 1024.11STA = 1004+61
ELEV = 1024.11STA = 1004+67ELEV = 1026.25STA = 1007+16
ELEV = 1016.29
STA = 1007+16
ELEV = 1016.29STA = 1006+81ELEV = 1018.47STA = 1006+81ELEV = 1018.47STA = 1005+66ELEV = 1023.22STA = 1005+73
ELEV = 1022.20 STA = 1005+77ELEV = 1022.82STA = 1005+83
ELEV = 1022.53
STA = 1005+83
ELEV = 1022.53
STA = 1004+92ELEV = 1025.43STA = 1004+96
ELEV = 1023.49
STA = 1004+98
ELEV = 1023.49 STA = 1005+01ELEV = 1025.17STA = 1005+01ELEV = 1025.17STA = 1007+21ELEV = 1014.75STA = 1007+24ELEV = 1014.40STA = 1007+25ELEV = 1014.36STA = 1007+37ELEV = 1013.08STA = 1007+37ELEV = 1013.08EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
-6.4%
-4.7%
-4.4%
-3.5%
-2.5%
-4.7%
-4.1%
-4.7%
-3.3%
0.2%-11.
5
%-3.6%-11.
0
%CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CEC
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEWF

F
I
SH
ING
CREEK
STA: 1007+16
IRONWOOD TRIBUTARY
END REACH 1 - RESTORATION
BEGIN REACH 2 - PRESERVATION
STA: 1009+26
IRONWOOD TRIBUTARY
END REACH 2 - PRESERVATION
IRONWOOD TRIBUTARY1025
103
0
1035
1040
1045
1050
1055
1060 10001005101010151020
1025
1030
1035104010451050
1015
1
0
2
0
1
0
2
5
10
3
0
10
3
5
10
4
0
104
5
EXISTING FARM ROAD
1005+00
1006+0
0
10
0
7
+
0
0
1009+26717+007
1
8
+
0
0
7
1
9
+
0
0MATCH L
INE

-
STA
1004+50
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles West.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaTimber TributaryStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.11.1December 12, 2018Sheet IndexN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.8.1
2.9.1
2.10.1
2.10.2
2.11.1
2.11.2
IRONWOODTRIBUTARYMAGNOLIATRIBUTARYSHEW RIDGETRIBUTARYT
IM
BER
TR
I
BU
TARY
SF FISHINGCREEKEXISTING GROUND
997
1000
1005
1010
1015
997
1000
1005
1010
1015
1113+50 1114+00 1114+50 1115+00 1115+50 1116+00 1116+50 1117+00 1117+50 1117+70
-4.6
%
-4.1
%
-4.0
%
-4.1
%
-3.4%
-3.9
%
-3.5
%
STA = 1113+71
ELEV = 1011.08
STA = 1113+77
ELEV = 1011.54
STA = 1113+97
ELEV = 1010.63
STA = 1114+07ELEV = 1009.81STA = 1114+16ELEV = 1009.81STA = 1114+26ELEV = 1010.34STA = 1114+46ELEV = 1009.50STA = 1114+61ELEV = 1008.27STA = 1114+75ELEV = 1008.27STA = 1114+90ELEV = 1009.00STA = 1115+22ELEV = 1007.70STA = 1115+32ELEV = 1006.00STA = 1115+42ELEV = 1006.00STA = 1115+51ELEV = 1007.23STA = 1115+79ELEV = 1006.08STA = 1115+89ELEV = 1005.08STA = 1115+99ELEV = 1005.08STA = 1116+10ELEV = 1005.78STA = 1116+29ELEV = 1005.12STA = 1116+40ELEV = 1003.52STA = 1116+51ELEV = 1003.52STA = 1116+62ELEV = 1004.62STA = 1116+98ELEV = 1003.22STA = 1117+06
ELEV = 1002.08
STA = 1117+14
ELEV = 1002.08STA = 1117+22ELEV = 1002.98STA = 1117+58ELEV = 1001.70STA = 1117+67ELEV = 1000.37PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
TIMBER TRIBUTARY
1030
1005
1010
1015
1020
1025
1030103510101015
1020
1025
1030
1114+00
1115+001116+00111
7
+
0
0
STA: 1113+77
BEGIN TIMBER TRIBUTARY - RESTORATION
MATCH LINE - STA 1117+70
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Profiles West.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaTimber TributaryStream Plan and Profile005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR2.11.2December 12, 2018Sheet IndexN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.8.1
2.9.1
2.10.1
2.10.2
2.11.1
2.11.2
IRONWOODTRIBUTARYMAGNOLIATRIBUTARYSHEW RIDGETRIBUTARYT
IM
BER
TR
I
BU
TARY
SF FISHINGCREEK990
995
1000
1005
990
995
1000
1005
1117+70 1118+00 1118+50 1119+00 1119+50 1120+00 1120+50 1121+00 1121+50 1122+00 1122+50 1122+70
EXISTING GROUND PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
-3.0%
-2.9%
-2.0%
-3.2%
-3.4%
-3.1%
-1.3%
-2.8%STA = 1117+75ELEV = 1000.37STA = 1117+84ELEV = 1001.45STA = 1118+27ELEV = 1000.19STA = 1118+31
ELEV = 999.08
STA = 1118+36
ELEV = 999.08STA = 1118+40ELEV = 1000.05STA = 1119+10ELEV = 998.00STA = 1119+28ELEV = 997.65STA = 1119+41ELEV = 997.22STA = 1119+50ELEV = 995.52STA = 1119+59ELEV = 995.52STA = 1119+69ELEV = 996.75STA = 1120+07ELEV = 995.45STA = 1120+23ELEV = 993.51STA = 1120+40ELEV = 993.51STA = 1120+56ELEV = 994.95STA = 1120+88ELEV = 993.95STA = 1121+03ELEV = 991.97STA = 1121+17ELEV = 991.97STA = 1121+32ELEV = 993.55STA = 1121+78ELEV = 992.95STA = 1121+94ELEV = 991.52STA = 1122+09ELEV = 991.52STA = 1122+24ELEV = 992.95STA = 1122+58ELEV = 992.00PROPOSED BANKFULL
CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECECECEWF FISHING CREEK
TI
M
B
E
R

T
R
I
B
U
T
A
R
Y9951000100510101015
10001
0
0
5
1
0
1
0
10
1
5
102
010
2
5103
0 724+00725+00
REPLACE EXISTING CULVERT
1
1
1
8
+
0
0
1119+00 1120+001121+
0
0
1122+00
11
2
2
+
5
8
STA: 1122+58
END TIMBER TRIBUTARY - RESTORATION
STA: 1118+89
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
INTERNAL CROSSING
STA: 1119+49
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
INTERNAL CROSSING
MATCH LINE - STA 1117+70
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Planting.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaPlant ListsPlanting005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR4.0December 12, 2018Buffer Planting Zone
Open/Graded Bare Roots
Species Common
Name
Max
Spacing
Indiv.
Spacing
Min.
Caliper
Size
Stratum # of Stems
Quercus
phellos
Willow Oak 12 ft.6-12 ft.0.25”-1.0”Canopy 10%
Platanus
occidentalis
Sycamore 12 ft.6-12 ft.0.25”-1.0”Canopy 20%
Betula nigra River Birch 12 ft.6-12 ft.0.25”-1.0”Canopy 15%
Liriodendron
tulipifera
Tulip Poplar 12 ft.6-12 ft.0.25”-1.0”Canopy 20%
Fraxinus
pennsylvanica
Green Ash 12 ft.6-12 ft.0.25”-1.0”Canopy 5%
70%
Alternatives
Alnus serrulata Tag Alder 12 ft.6-12 ft.0.25”-1.0”Canopy 10%
Quercus
pagoda
Cherrybark Oak 12 ft.6-12 ft.0.25”-1.0”Canopy 10%
Quercus
michauxii
Swamp
Chestnut Oak
12 ft.6-12 ft.0.25”-1.0”Canopy 10%
Total 100%
Permanent Riparian Seeding - Open Canopy
Pure Live Seed (20 lbs/ acre)
Approved Date Species Name Common Name Stratum Density
(lbs/acre)
All Year Panicum rigidulum Redtop Panicgrass Herb 1.5
All Year Agrostis hyemalis Winter Bentgrass Herb 4.0
All Year Chasmanthium latifolium River Oats Herb 2.0
All Year Rudbeckia hirta Blackeyed Susan Herb 1.0
All Year Coreopsis lanceolata Lanceleaf Coreopsis Herb 1.0
All Year Carex vulpinoidea Fox Sedge Herb 3.0
All Year Panicum clandestinum Deertongue Herb 3.5
All Year Elymus virginicus Virginia Wild Rye Herb 2.0
All Year Asclepias syrica Common Milkweed Herb 0.2
All Year Baptisia australis Blue False Indigo Herb 0.2
All Year Gaillardia pulchella Annual Gaillardia Herb 1.0
All Year Echinacea purpurea Pale Purple Coneflower Herb 0.6
Streambank Planting Zone
Live Stakes
Species Common Name Max Spacing Indiv.
Spacing
Min. Size Stratum % of Stems
Salix nigra Black Willow 8 ft.2-8 ft.0.5”-1.5” cal.Shrub 10%
Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 8 ft.2-8 ft.0.5”-1.5” cal.Shrub 35%
Salix sericea Silky Willow 8 ft.2-8 ft.0.5”-1.5” cal.Shrub 40%
Physocarpos
opulifolius
Ninebark 8 ft.2-8 ft.0.5”-1.5” cal.Shrub 15%
100%
Herbaceous Plugs
Juncus effusus Common Rush 5 ft.3-5 ft.1.0”- 2.0” plug Herb 45%
Carex alata Broadwing Sedge 5 ft.3-5 ft.1.0”- 2.0” plug Herb 45%
Panicum virgatum Switchgrass 5 ft.3-5 ft.1.0”- 2.0” plug Herb 10%
100%
Shaded Areas Bare Roots - Buffer Planting As Needed to Increase Density
Species Common name # of stems
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore 15%
Fraxinus pennsylvanicum Green Ash 15%
Betula nigra River Birch 10%
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar 10%
Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 10%
Carpinus caroliniana Ironwood 5%
Diospyros virginiana Persimmon 5%
Quercus pagoda Cherrybark Oak 5%
Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 5%
Nyssa sylvatica Black Gum 5%
Callicarpa americana Beautyberry 5%
Cornus alternifolia Pagoda Dogwood 5%
Euonymus americanus American Strawberry Bush 1%
Calycanthus floridus Sweetshrub 1%
Magnolia virginiana Sweetbay Magnolia 1%
Hamamelis virginiana Witch-Hazel 1%
Clethra alnifolia Sweet Pepperbush 1%
100%
Note:
Permanent Riparian seeding in
all disturbed areas within
Conservation Easement
Pasture Seeding
Approved
Date
Species Name Stratum Common Name Density
(lbs/acre)
All Year Festuca arundinacea Herb Tall Fescue 80
All Year Trifolium repens Herb White Clover 8
Disturbed areas outside easement.
See Detail 3, Sheet 6.5 for
Live Staking instructions on
streambanks.
Note:
OPTIONAL TRANSPLANTS to be
used at Engineer's discretion
for streambank and floodplain
planting.
Open Riparian Buffer Planting Zone Streambank Planting Zone
Shaded Riparian Buffer Planting Zone
Pasture Seeding
0'300'600'900'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Planting.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaPlanting OverviewPlanting005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR4.1December 12, 2018NFSFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHAOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUE
OUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUECEC
E
CECECECECECECECECECECECEC
E
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CECECE
CECEC
E
CE CE CE
C
E CECECECECECECECECECECECECEC
E
C
E
CEC
E
CECECEC
E
CE CE CE CECECECECE
CECECECEC
E
C
E
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECECECEC
E
C
E
CE CE
CE
CE CECE CECECECE CECECECECE
CE
CE CECECECE
CECECECE CE CE
CEC
E
CECECECECECECECEC
E
CECEC
E
C
E
CE
C
E
CE CE
CE
CE
CE CECECEC
E
CECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CECECECE
CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
FEXISTING FARM ROAD
EXISTI
N
G F
AR
M R
O
A
D
SF FISH
ING
CREEK
CRITCHE
R

T
R
I
B

A
CRITC
H
E
R
T
RI
B
U
T
A
R
Y
SF FISHING CREEK
CHICKEN TRIBUTARY 1CHICK
E
N
T
RI
B
U
T
A
R
Y
1
ASF F
ISH
ING
CREEKSF FISHING CREEKROBIN HILLTRIBUTARYOAK
TRIB
U
T
A
R
Y
WF FISHING CREEK
WF FISHING CREEKS
H
EW

R
I
D
G
E
T
R
I
B
U
T
A
R
Y
MAGNOLIATRIBUTARYTIMBER
TR
IBUTARY
IRONWOODTRIBUTARYANTIO
C
H
TRIBU
T
A
R
Y
SHEET 4.3
SHEET 4.2
SHEET 4.4
SHEET 4.5
SHEET 4.7
SHEET 4.8
SHEET 4.6 ANTIOCH
CHURCH
ROADROBIN HILL ROAD
0'80'160'240'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Planting.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaPlanting005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR4.2December 12, 2018NCECECECECECEC
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
CE
CE
CE
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEFSF F
ISH
ING
CREEK
CRITCH
E
R

T
R
I
B

A
CRITC
H
E
R
T
RI
B
U
T
A
R
Y
MATCHLINE - SHEET 4.3
MATCHLINE - SHEET 4.4
0'80'160'240'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Planting.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaPlanting005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR4.3December 12, 2018N
CECECECECECECE CE
CE
CE CECE
CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE CE CE CECECECE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CECECECECEC
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEC
E
C
E
CECECECECECECECECEC
E CE
CE
CECECE CECECECECECECECECE
C
E
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECRITCHER TRIBUTARYMATCHLINE - SHEET 4.2MATCHLINE - SHEET 4.5CRITCHER
TR
IB
CCRITCHER TRIB DA
N
T
I
O
C
H

T
R
I
B

B
1
ANTIOCH TRIB BANTIO
C
H
T
RI
B
U
T
A
R
Y
ANTIOCH TRIB AANTIOCH TRIB CANTIOCH
TR
IB
A1SF FISHING CREEKEXISTING FARM ROAD
A
N
T
I
O
C
H

T
R
I
B

B
1
ANTIOCH TRIB BANTIO
C
H
T
RI
B
U
T
A
R
Y
ANTIOCH TRIB AANTIOCH TRIB CANTIOCH
TR
IB
A1
0'80'160'240'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Planting.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaPlanting005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR4.4December 12, 2018NFOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHE
OHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHECECECECECECECECECECECEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUECE CE CE CE CE
CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEMATCHLINE - SHEET 4.4MATCHLINE - SHEET 4.2MATCHLINE - SHEET 4.4
MATCHLINE - SHEET 4.5
EXISTING F
A
R
M
R
O
A
D
CHICKEN
TR
IBUTARY
1
CHICK
E
N
T
RI
B
1
A
SF FISHING CREEK
0'80'160'240'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Planting.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaPlanting005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR4.5December 12, 2018NOHEOHE
OHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHECECECECECECEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEC
E
C
E
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEC
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CECE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEC
E
C
E
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEMATCHLINE - SHEET 4.3MATCHLINE - SHEET 4.4MATCHLINE - SHEET 4.6S
F

F
I
SH
ING

C
R
E
E
KROBIN
HILL TRIB
UTARY
R
O
B
I
N

H
I
L
L

T
R
I
B

A
OAK T
RI
B
UT
A
RY
0'80'160'240'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Planting.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaPlanting005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR4.6December 12, 2018N
OHE OHE OHE
O
H
E
O
H
E
OHEOHEOHEOHEOHE OHE OHE
OUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUECECECECE
CE
CE
C
E
C
E
C
E
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEC
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CECECECECECEMATCHLINE - SHEET 4.5MATCHLINE - SHEET 4.6MATCHLINE - SHEET 4.7MATCHLINE - SHEET 4.8
MATCHLINE - SHEET 4.6 MATCHLINE - SHEET 4.6
ROBIN HILL TRIB B
IRONWOOD
TRIBUTARYMAGNOL
IA

T
R
I
BU
TA
R
YWF FISHING CREEK
0'80'160'240'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Planting.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaPlanting005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR4.7December 12, 2018NSFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHA
SFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFHASFH
A
SF
H
A
SFHA
SFHA
SFHA SFHASFHACECECECECE
CE
CE OUEOUEOUEOUEOUECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEC
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
CECECECECECECECEC
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEC
E
CE
CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEC
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
MATCHLINE - SHEET 4.7
MATCHLINE - SHEET 4.6
MATCHLINE - SHEET 4.7
MATCHLINE - SHEET 4.5MATCHLINE - SHEET 4.7MATCHLINE - SHEET 4.8S
F

F
I
S
H
I
N
G

C
R
E
E
K
WF FIS
H
I
N
G

C
R
E
E
KTIMBER
TR
IBUTARY
SF FISHING CREEK
0'80'160'240'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Planting.dwgDecember 5, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaPlanting005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR4.8December 12, 2018NCECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
C
E
C
E
C
E
CE CE CE CECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE CECECECECECECECE
CE
MATCHLINE - SHEET 4.8MATCHLINE - SHEET 4.6MATCHLINE - SHEET 4.7 MATCHLINE - SHEET 4.8WF FISHING CREEKSHEW RIDGE TRIBUTARYTIMBER TRIBUTARY
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTION005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR6.1December 12, 2018Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Details.dwgMarch 7, 2012Chunky Riffle
Not to Scale
Woody Riffle
Not to Scale
1
6.1
Constructed Riffle
Not to Scale
Jazz Riffle Structure
Not to Scale
TOE OF SLOPE (TYP)
RIFFLE BOTTOM
WIDTH PER
TYPICAL SECTIONS
Plan View
SEE PROFILE
FOR LENGTH OF RIFFLE
Profile A-A'Section B-B'
TOP OF BANK (TYP)
Section A-A'
Plan View
RIFFLE BOTTOM
WIDTH PER
TYPICAL SECTIONS
SEE PROFILE
FOR LENGTH OF RIFFLE
LOG EXPOSED 1" TO 3" ABOVE
FINISHED RIFFLE ELEVATION
Section B-B'
Plan View
Profile View A-A'
Log Section B-B'FLOWA'
B
B'ATOE OF SLOPE (TYP)
TOP OF BANK (TYP)
SEE PROFILE
FOR LENGTH OF RIFFLE
Section A-A'
Plan View
Section B-B'
A A'
B
B'
VARIES PER
BASEFLOW
3" MAX
2
6.1
4
6.13
6.1 Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaDetails SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL RIFFLE INVERT PER PROFILE
TOP OF BANK (TYP)
HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATION
POINT PER PROFILE
TAIL OF RIFFLE ELEVATION
POINT PER PROFILE
SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
3" TO 6" BRUSHY MATERIAL
WORKED INTO ROCKY SUBSTRATE
MICRO POOL HABITAT
BEHIND LARGER
WOODY DEBRIS
MICRO POOL HABITAT
BEHIND LARGER WOODY DEBRIS
3" TO 6" DIAMETER WOODY
DEBRIS WORKED INTO RIFFLE
SUBSTRATE
SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
CLASS 1 STONE
OR SALVAGED
ONSITE BOULDERS
MIN 0.5'x1'x1.5'
TAIL OF RIFFLE
ELEVATION POINT
PER PROFILE
HEAD OF RIFFLE
ELEVATION POINT
PER PROFILE
TOP OF BANK (TYP)
RIFFLE INVERT PER PROFILE
SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
CLASS 1 STONE
OR SALVAGED
ONSITE BOULDERS
MIN 0.5'x1'x1.5'
CLASS 1 STONE
OR SALVAGED
ONSITE BOULDERS
MIN 0.5'x1'x1.5'
SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
TAIL OF RIFFLE ELEVATION
POINT PER PROFILE
ROCK VANES MAY
BE USED IN PLACE
OF LOGS AT
ENGINEER'S DISCRETION
BURY INTO BANK 1' MIN. (TYP)
BANKFULL
HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATION
POINT PER PROFILE
BURY INTO BANK 5' MIN. (TYP)
SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
LOG STRUCTURE
EXPOSED UNTIL
CENTER OF CHANNEL
SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
MIN.
TAIL OF RIFFLE ELEVATION
POINT PER PROFILE
HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATION
POINT PER PROFILE
FLOW
A A'
B'
B
HEAD OF RIFFLE
FLOW
TOE OF SLOPE (TYP)
A
B'
B
TOP OF BANK (TYP)
RIFFLE
A'
TOE OF SLOPE
TOP OF BANK
TOE OF SLOPE
TOP OF BANK
FLOWFLOW
TOE OF SLOPETOP OF BANKEMBED/BURY INTO BANK 3' MIN
NOTES:
1.STRUCTURES SHOULD VARY IN SIZE AND
TYPE WITHIN EACH RIFFLE.
2.ROCK MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR LOGS AT
ENGINEER'S DISCRETION.
CR-CR CR-WR
CR-CHCR-JZ
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Details.dwgMarch 7, 20121
6.2
3
6.2
Rock and Roll Riffle
Not to Scale
Plan View
Profile View A-A'
0% - 4%
1/2 TO 2/3
BANKFULL
Log Section B-B'
TOP OF BANK
BURY INTO BANK 3' MIN. (TYP)
POOL
WIDTH
PER
TYPICAL
SECTION
FLOW55° TO 65°
(TYP)
B'
B
0.5' MAX.
5' MIN.
(TYP)
FLOW
A
Y 20°-30°
SCOUR
POOL
FLOW
Plan View TOE OF SLOPE
FILTER FABRIC
EXTENDS 5' MIN.
Section B-B'
Section A-A'
A'
A
B'
B
H
TOP OF BANK
OFFSET HEADER LOG
0.25' TO 0.5' UPSTREAM
OF FOOTER LOG
TOP OF BANK (TYP)
TOE OF SLOPE (TYP)
FLOW
VANE ARM
LENGTH
(X)
3%-5%
A'
THALWEG
TOP OF BANK
NORMAL WATER
SURFACE
SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
NONWOVEN
FILTER FABRIC
TOE OF
SLOPE
SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
12" DIAMETER OR
GREATER (TYP)
BANKFULL
SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
HEADER LOG
FOOTER LOG
HEADER LOG
FOOTER LOG
NONWOVEN
FILTER FABRIC
SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
PLACE HEADER BOULDER
TO PREVENT LOG FROM SHIFTING.
INVERT ELEVATION
PER PROFILE EXCAVATE POOL
PER PROFILE
PLACE HEADER BOULDERS
WITH 1' TO 2' CLEAR SPACE
BETWEEN ROCKS.
NO GAP BETWEEN FOOTERS
NOTES:
1.BOULDER MATERIAL CAN BE SUBSTITUTED IN PLACE
OF ANGLED LOGS WITH APPROVAL OF ENGINEER.
HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATION
POINT PER PROFILE
TAIL OF RIFFLE ELEVATION
POINT PER PROFILE
HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATION
POINT PER PROFILE
TAIL OF RIFFLE ELEVATION
POINT PER PROFILE FLOWCR-RR
Log J-Hook
Not to Scale
5' MIN.
(TYP)5' MIN.
(TYP)005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR6.2December 12, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaDetailsTOP OF BANK (TYP)
TOE OF SLOPE (TYP)
A
A'
Profile View
Plan View
Section A - A'
STREAMBED
EXTEND FILTER FABRIC
5' MIN. UPSTREAMFLOW
EMBED LOG
3' (MIN.)
EXCAVATED
SCOUR POOL
SILL ELEVATION
PER PROFILE
SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
FILTER FABRIC
SILL ELEVATION
PER PROFILE (TYP)
SILL ELEVATION
PER PROFILE (TYP)
FOOTER LOG
HEADER LOG
2
6.2
Log Sill
Not to Scale
Channel Stabilization
Not to Scale
4
6.2
2.5:1

M
A
X
4.0' MIN
1.0' MIN
NOTES:
1.SIDE SLOPES AND BOTTOMS TO BE
SEEDED WITH PERMANENT RIPARIAN
SEED MIX.
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Details.dwgMarch 7, 20123% - 5%H
TOE OF
SLOPE
FOOTER LOG
TOP OF BANK
Profile B - B'
INVERT ELEVATION
PER PROFILE
HEADER LOG
Y
SCOUR
POOLFLOW
EXCAVATE POOL
PER PROFILE
Plan View
A'
ATOP OF BANK (TYP)TOE OF SLOPE (TYP)20°-30°STREAMBED
SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
NONWOVEN
FILTER FABRIC
HEADER LOG
EXTEND FILTER FABRIC
5' MIN. UPSTREAM
Section A-A'
FOOTER LOG
STABILIZE VANE
WITH ONE BOULDER
ON EACH SIDE
X
5'
B
B'
FLOW
1
6.3
Log Vane
Not to Scale
NOTES:
1.ON SMALLER STREAMS THE STABILIZATION
BOULDER MAY BE REMOVED PER
ENGINEER'S DISCRETION.005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR6.3December 12, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaDetailsFLOWTOE OF SLOPE (TYP)Plan View
A
A'B B'
Profile A-A'
EMBED 5'
INTO
BANK (TYP)Section B-B'
SILL ELEVATION
PER PROFILETOP OF BANK (TYP)SILL ELEVATION PER PROFILETOP OF BANK
5'
FILTER FABRIC
12" NOMINAL THICKNESS
OF EQUAL PARTS
CLASS A, B, AND 1 STONE
EXTEND FILTER
FABRIC 5' MIN.
UPSTREAM
2
6.3
Rock Sill
Not to Scale
θ FLOWLEAVE 1'-2' GAP
BETWEEN BOULDERS
SCOUR POOL TO BE
EXCAVATED PER DIRECTION
OF THE ENGINEER.
A'
ATOE OF SLOPETOP OF BANKTOE OF SLOPETYPE 2
FILTER FABRIC
5' MIN.
CHANNEL BED
SLOPE (S)
1/2 to 3/4
BANKFULL
STAGE
(X)
TOP OF BANK
ELEVATION POINT PER PROFILE.
STRUCTURE ELEVATION POINT
LOCATED ON FOOTER ROCK.
VAN ARM
LENGTH (Y)
1/3
Bottom
Width of
Channel
(Z)
Section A-A'
Plan
Profile B-B'
B'
B
3
6.3
Boulder J-Hook
Not to Scale
SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
UPHILL
36"
2"
Typical Stakes
NOTES:
1.BOARD FOR STAKES SHALL BE 2" X 2" X 24"
OR 2" X 2" X 36" AS DIRECTED BY THE
ENGINEER.
2.ROOTED/LEAFED CONDITIONS OF THE
LIVING PLANT MATERIAL IS NOT
REPRESENTATIVE AT THE TIME OF
INSTALLATION.
TOP OF BANK (TYP)
Section View
SECURE WITH 24"
LONG STAKES (TYP)
BRANCH CUTTINGS (TYP)
16 GAUGE GALVANIZED
WIRE SECURED TO STAKES
FILL IN GAPS WITH
TOP SOIL.
2' to 3'
2"
16 GAUGE GALVANIZED
WIRE SECURED TO STAKES
SHALL BE A MINIMUM
OF 35 BRANCH CUTTINGS
PER SQUARE YARD
(1 INCH MAX. DIAMETER)
TOE OF SLOPE (TYP)
6" MIN
1.25"
.4"
Eco-Stake
4
6.3
Brush Mattress
Not to Scale
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Details.dwgMarch 7, 2012005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR6.4December 12, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaDetailsθ
SCOUR
POOL
FLOW
PLACE HEADER BOULDERS
WITH 1' TO 2' CLEAR SPACE
BETWEEN ROCKS
EXCAVATE POOL
PER PROFILE
Plan View
A'
A
TOE OF SLOPE (TYP)
TOP OF BANK (TYP)
Section A-A'
Profile View B-B'
SLOPE (S)H
TOE OF
SLOPE
TOP OF BANK
STRUCTURE INVERT
ELEVATION PER PROFILE.
INVERT ELEVATION
PER PROFILE
VANE ARM
LENGTH
(Y)
FOOTER ROCK
HEADER ROCK
Z
TOE OF SLOPENONWOVEN
FILTER FABRIC
EXTEND FILTER FABRIC
5' MIN. UPSTREAM
HEADER ROCK
FOOTER ROCK
CHANNEL BED
OFFSET HEADER
0.25' TO 0.5'
UPSTREAM OF FOOTER
B'
B
2
6.4
Rock Vane
Not to Scale
SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
3:1 3:1
MIX OF NATIVE
ROCK
EQUIVALENT TO
CLASS 1 RIP-RAP
CONNECT TO
EXISTING GROUND
1.5' MIN
2:1 2:1 CONNECT TO
EXISTING GROUND
BACKFILL WITH GRADED MIX OF
RIPRAP,SMALL BOULDERS,
AND NATIVE ROCK MATERIAL
1.0' MIN
CASCADE HEIGHT VARIES
PER PROFILE
DOUBLE STACK
BOULDER / ROCK MIX.
FILL ALL GAPS BETWEEN
LARGE BOULDERS
OVER EXCAVATE BY A MIN
OF 1.0' AND BACKFILL WITH
WELL-GRADED MIX OF BALLAST
AND CLASS A/B RIPRAPSLO
P
E

V
A
R
I
E
S
PER

P
R
O
F
I
L
E
RIFFLE MATERIAL /
NATURAL ROCK
NATIVE ROCK
EQUIVALENT
TO CLASS I RIPRAP OR
ON-SITE STONEMEETING
CLASS 1 GRADATION
FILTER FABRIC
EXISTING SOIL
TERRACE EXISTING
SLOPE FOOTER BOULDER
TOP OF BANK
TOE OF BANK
A B
A'B'
FLOW
C
C'
CONNECT TO
EXISTING GROUND2:1 2:1
FOOTER BOULDER
HEADER BOULDER
1.0' MIN
NOTES:
1.MINIMUM SIZE FOR BOULDERS SHALL BE 2' x 2' x 1'.
2.VOID SPACES BETWEEN BOULDERS ON CASCADE
SHALL BE FILLED WITH SMALLER NATIVE ROCK.
3.IF NATIVE ROCK IS NOT AVAILABLE, QUARRIED ROCK
MAY BE SUBSTITUTED IN THE SAME SIZES.
4.ALL SMALLER ROCK SHALL BE HETEROGENEOUS AND
WELL MIXED.
3
6.4
Rock Cascade
Not to Scale
Section A-A'
Section B-B'
Section C-C'
Riffle Sequence Plan View Profile
CHANNEL BOTTOM
B
20°
0.5'
TOP SITS 0.5'
ABOVE BASEFLOW.
TOP OF BANK
NORMAL
BASEFLOW
Section B-B'
Section A-A'
NOTE:
1.FOR STREAM BEDS WITH
COARSE SUBSTRATE PROVIDE
FOOTER ROCKS.
FOOTER ROCKEMBED BOULDERS 1.0' (MIN)
BELOW CHANNEL BED
Profile View C-C'
BASE FLOW
ELEVATION
BACKFILL (ON-SITE NATIVE
MATERIALS OR NO. 57 STONE)
EXTEND FILTER FABRIC
5' MIN. UPSTREAM
HEADER ROCK
FOOTER ROCK
CHANNEL BED
OFFSET HEADER
0.25' TO 0.5'
UPSTREAM OF FOOTER
HEADER ROCK
SEE PROFILE
0.5'
NATIVE MATERIAL AND
COURSE FILL FROM EXISTING
STREAMBED. REPLACE
ERODED BANK WITH 2:1
SLOPE.
EXISTING
ERODED BANK
B
A
A
EXISTING
ERODED BANK
FOOTER ROCK
Plan View
FLOW
FLOW SLOPE
1
6.4
Boulder Toe Protection
Not to Scale
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONPlan View
Pool Installation w/ Root WadsTOP OF BANKTOP OF BANK
TOE OF SLOPE
NOTES:
1.BANK TO BE STABILIZED THAT WILL ACCOMMODATE THE SIZE OF
TRANSPLANT TO BE PLACED.
2.EXCAVATE TRANSPLANT. EXCAVATE THE ENTIRE ROOT MASS
AND AS MUCH ADDITIONAL SOIL MATERIAL AS POSSIBLE. IF
ENTIRE ROOT MASS CANNOT BE EXCAVATED IN ONE BUCKET
LOAD, THE TRANSPLANT IS TOO LARGE AND ANOTHER SHOULD
BE SELECTED.
3.PLACE TRANSPLANT IN THE BANK TO BE STABILIZED SO THAT
VEGETATION IS ORIENTATED VERTICALLY.
4.FILL IN ANY HOLES AROUND THE TRANSPLANT AND COMPACT.
5.ANY LOOSE SOIL LEFT IN THE STREAM SHOULD BE REMOVED.
6.PLACE MULTIPLE TRANSPLANTS CLOSE TOGETHER SUCH THAT
THEY TOUCH.
Section View
Riffle Installation
Section View
Pool Installation w/ Root Wads
Plan View
Riffle Installation
TOP OF BANKFLOWFLOW
Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Details.dwgMarch 7, 2012BRUSH TOE
EROSION CONTROL
MATTING (TYP.)
TOP OF BANKTRANSPLANTED VEGETATION
AND ROOTMASS
BRUSH TOE
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
TRANSPLANTED VEGETATION
AND ROOTMASS
TOP OF BANK
EROSION CONTROL
MATTING (TYP.)
TRANSPLANTED VEGETATION
AND ROOTMASS
005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR6.5December 12, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaDetails2
6.5
Transplanted Vegetation
Not to Scale
TOP OF BANK
EROSION CONTROL
MATTING (TYP.)
TRANSPLANTED SOD AND ROOTMASS
TOP OF BANK
TOE OF SLOPE
NOTES:
1.PREPARE THE BANK WHERE THE SOD MAT WILL BE
TRANSPLANTED BY RAKING & FERTILIZING.
2.EXCAVATE TRANSPLANT SOD MATS WITH A WIDE
BUCKET AND AS MUCH ADDITIONAL SOIL MATERIAL AS
POSSIBLE.
3.PLACE TRANSPLANT ON THE BANK TO BE STABILIZED.
4.SECURE WITH SOD STAPLES.
5.FILL IN ANY HOLES AROUND THE TRANSPLANT AND
COMPACT.
6.ANY LOOSE SOIL LEFT IN THE STREAM SHOULD BE
REMOVED.
7.PLACE MULTIPLE TRANSPLANTS CLOSE TOGETHER SUCH
THAT THEY TOUCH.
8.INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MATTING ABOVE
TRANSPLANTED SOD MATS.
Section View
Riffle Installation Plan View
Riffle Installation
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
FLOW
TRANSPLANTED SOD AND ROOTMASS
1
6.5
Transplanted Sod Mats
Not to Scale
TOP OF BANK
LIVE STAKE (TYP)
SEE PLAN VIEW
FOR SPACING
EROSION CONTROL
MATTING
(SEE DETAIL)
Plan View - Small Streams
2' TO 3' LIVE STAKE
TAPERED AT BOTTOM
1/2" TO 2"
DIAMETER
Live Stake Detail
NOTE:
1.LIVE STAKES TO BE PLANTED IN AREAS AS
SHOWN ON PLANS AND DIRECTED BY THE
ENGINEER.
TOE OF SLOPE
JUNCUS PLUG (TYP)
6' - 8' SPACING FOR LIVE
STAKES
3' - 5' SPACING FOR JUNCUS
PLUGS
3' OUTSIDE TOP OF BANK
TOE OF SLOPE
Plan View - Large Streams
6' - 8' SPACING FOR LIVE STAKES
3' - 5' SPACING FOR JUNCUS PLUGS
2 - 3' SPACING FOR LIVE STAKES
TOP OF BANK
TOE OF SLOPE
Section View - Large Streams
TOP OF BANK
EROSION CONTROL
MATTING
(SEE DETAIL)
TOE OF SLOPE
JUNCUS PLUG (TYP)
Section View - Small Streams
LIVE STAKE (TYP)
SEE PLAN VIEW
FOR SPACING
3'
3
6.5
Live Staking and Juncus Plugs
Not to Scale
1 2 3 4 5 6
INSERT THE DIBBLE, OR
SHOVEL, STRAIGHT DOWN
INTO THE SOIL TO THE
FULL DEPTH OF THE BLADE
AND PULL BACK ON THE
HANDLE TO OPEN THE
PLANTING HOLE. (DO NOT
ROCK THE SHOVEL BACK
AND FORTH AS THIS
CAUSES SOIL IN THE
PLANTING HOLE TO BE
COMPACTED, INHIBITING
ROOT GROWTH.
REMOVE THE DIBBLE, OR
SHOVEL, AND PUSH THE
SEEDLING ROOTS DEEP
INTO THE PLANTING HOLE.
PULL THE SEEDLING BACK
UP TO THE CORRECT
PLANTING DEPTH (THE
ROOT COLLAR SHOULD BE 1
TO 3 INCHES BELOW THE
SOIL SURFACE). GENTLY
SHAKE THE SEEDLING TO
ALLOW THE ROOTS TO
STRAIGHTEN OUT. DO NOT
TWIST OR SPIN THE
SEEDLING OR LEAVE THE
ROOTS J-ROOTED.
INSERT THE DIBBLE, OR
SHOVEL, SEVERAL INCHES
IN FRONT OF THE
SEEDLING AND PUSH THE
BLADE HALFWAY INTO
THE SOIL. TWIST AND
PUSH THE HANDLE
FORWARD TO CLOSE THE
TOP OF THE SLIT TO HOLD
THE SEEDLING IN PLACE.
PUSH THE DIBBLE, OR
SHOVEL, DOWN TO
THE FULL DEPTH OF
THE BLADE.
PULL BACK ON THE
HANDLE TO CLOSE THE
BOTTOM OF THE
PLANTING HOLD. THEN
PUSH FORWARD TO CLOSE
THE TOP, ELIMINATING AIR
POCKETS AROUND THE
ROOT.
REMOVE THE DIBBLE, OR
SHOVEL, AND CLOSE AND
FIRM UP THE OPENING
WITH YOUR HEEL. BE
CAREFUL TO AVOID
DAMAGING THE SEEDLING.
NOTES:
1.ALL SOILS WITHIN THE BUFFER PLANTING
AREA SHALL BE DISKED, AS REQUIRED, PRIOR
TO PLANTING.
2.ALL PLANTS SHALL BE PROPERLY HANDLED
PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO INSURE SURVIVAL.
DIBBLE BAR
PLANTING BAR SHALL HAVE A
BLADE WITH A TRIANGULAR
CROSS-SECTION, AND SHALL
BE 12 INCHES LONG, 4
INCHES WIDE AND 1 INCH
THICK AT CENTER.
ROOTING PRUNING
ALL ROOTS SHALL BE PRUNED
TO AN APPORIATE LENGTH
TO PREVENT J-ROOTING.
RESTORED
CHANNEL
BANKFULL
BUFFER WIDTH
VARIES
SPACING PER
PLANTING PLAN
Section View
4
6.5
Bare Root Planting
Not to Scale
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONSection View
ECO-STAKE (TYP)
EROSION CONTROL
MATTING (TYP)
Plan View
STAKE (TYP)TOP OF BANK
TOE OF SLOPE
TOE OF SLOPE
12"
2"
2"
Typical Stake
TOP OF BANK
SECURE MATTING IN
6" DEEP TRENCH
3' MAX.
SPACING
6" MIN. OVERLAP IN
DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION
AT MAT ENDS
SOIL EXCAVATED IN
TRENCHLINE SHALL BE
PLACED ON UPHILL
SIDE OF ROLL
1"x1"x24" WOOD STAKE,
6' O.C.
8-10" DIA. FIBER ROLL
OF STRAW & BURLAP
TWINE MESH
PLACE SOIL EXCAVATED DURING
TRENCHING ON UPHILL SIDE OF ROLL
DRIVE STAKES
IN ON ALTERNATING
SIDES OF ROLL
OVERLAP ROLL EDGES 12"
AND SECURE TO PROVIDE
A TIGHT JOINT
6'-0"
MAX.
6'-0"
MAX.,
TYP.
2" MIN
4" MAX
FLOW
FL
O
W
Section View
Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Details.dwgMarch 7, 20128"
4"
NOTES:
1.USE WIRE A MINIMUM OF 32" IN WIDTH AND
WITH A MINIMUM OF 6 LINES OF WIRES WITH
12" STAY SPACING.
2.USE FILTER FABRIC A MINIMUM OF 36" IN
WIDTH AND FASTEN ADEQUATELY TO THE
WIRES AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
3.PROVIDE 5' STEEL POST OF THE SELF-FASTENER
ANGLE STEEL TYPE. ANGLE STEEL TYPE.
WIRE
TOP AND BOTTOM STRAND
SHALL BE 10 GAUGE MIN.
MIDDLE AND VERTICAL WIRES
SHALL BE 12 1
2 GAGE MIN.
8' MAX. WITH WIRE
(6' MAX. WITHOUT WIRE)
FILTER FABRIC
EXISTING GROUND
FILTER FABRIC
COMPACTED FILL
STEEL POST
2'-0" DEPTH
EXTEND FABRIC
INTO TRENCH
6" MIN
1.25"
.4"
Typical Eco-Stake
STAKE (TYP)
STAKE (TYP)
ECO-STAKE (TYP)
1
6.6
Erosion Control Matting
Not to Scale
2
6.6
BMP Fiber Roll
Not to Scale
NOTES:
1.FIBER ROLLS WILL BE IN PLACE IF GRADING OCCURS
BETWEEN OCTOBER 1 AND APRIL 30.
2.FIBER ROLLS WILL BE PLACED AT THE LIMITS OF
GRADING IN LOCATIONS WHERE THE LAND IS SLOPING
TOWARDS THE PROPERTY LINE WHERE THERE IS LESS
THAN A 20 FOOT BUFFER OF PRESERVED EXISTING
VEGETATION BETWEEN THE LIMITS OF GRADING AND
THE PROPERTY LINE. FIBER ROLLS MAY BE PLACED AT
OTHER LOCATIONS AS DIRECTED BY THE DESIGNER
3.INSTALL FIBER ROLL ALONG CONTOUR. RUNOFF MUST
NOT BE ALLOWED TO RUN UNDER OR AROUND ROLL.
3
6.6
Temporary Silt Fence
Not to Scale 005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR6.6December 12, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaDetailsFLOWCOVER LOG
TOP OF BANK (TYP)TOE OF SLOPE (TYP)A
A'2:
1
1'
FOOTER LOG
5' MIN.
TRANSPLANT/
BRUSH TOE
COVER LOG
FOOTER LOG
BURIED 6" BELOW
MAX POOL DEPTH
4
6.6
Cover Log
Not to Scale
Section A-A'
Plan View
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONCULVERT TABLE
CULVERT I.D.Do
(FT)
La
(FT)
D50
(FT)
Dmax
(FT)
APRON THICKNESS
(FT)VOLUME (CY)
1 X
2 X
X X
X X
OUTLET PIPE DIAMETER (Do)
3(Do)Do+0.4(La)
La
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
(SEE INSET "B")
INTAKE HOSE
PUMP
DISCHARGE HOSE
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
(SEE INSET "B")
10' X 5' STABILIZED OUTLET
USING CLASS B RIPRAP AND
NCDOT TYPE 2 FILTER FABRIC.
(SEE INSET "C")
INTAKE HOSE
DEWATERING
PUMP
DISCHARGE HOSE
DEWATERING BAG
(SEE INSET "A")
SAND BAG
(24" X 12" X 6")
OR STONE.
IMPERVIOUS SHEETING
FLOW
FLEXIBLE DISCHARGE HOSE FROM
PUMP AROUND PUMP HELD IN PLACE
WITH SAND BAGS AS NEEDED.10' MIN.
STABILIZED OUTLET USING CLASS B
RIPRAP TRENCHED INTO EXISTING
GROUND A MINIMUM OF 6". SIZE AND
LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED IN THE
FIELD BY THE ENGINEER.
FILTER FABRIC
Inset "C"
Stabilized Outlet
Plan View
Inset "B"
Impervious Dike
EXISTING TERRAIN DEWATERING BAG
STREAM BED
FILTER FABRIC
8" of CLASS B RIPRAP
15' to 20'
NOTE:
1.PROVIDE STABILIZED OUTLET
TO STREAMBED.
10'
15'
BAG PLACED ON
AGGREGATED OR STRAW.
HIGH STRENGTH
DOUBLE STITCHED
"J" TYPE SEAMS.
SEWN IN SPOUT
HIGH STRENGTH STRAPPING
FOR HOLDING HOSE
IN PLACE.
FLEXIBLE
DISCHARGE HOSE
WATER FLOW
FROM PUMP
Inset "A"
Dewatering Bag
ACTIVE WORK AREA
DEWATERING
BAG
INTAKE HOSE
DEWATERING
PUMP
DISCHARGE HOSE
DEWATERING BAG
(SEE INSET "A")
FLEXIBLE DISCHARGE HOSE FROM
PUMP AROUND PUMP HELD IN PLACE
WITH SAND BAGS AS NEEDED.
10' MIN.
STABILIZED OUTLET USING CLASS B
RIPRAP TRENCHED INTO EXISTING
GROUND A MINIMUM OF 6". SIZE AND
LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED IN THE
FIELD BY THE ENGINEER.
FILTER FABRIC
Inset "B"
Stabilized Outlet
Plan View
EXISTING TERRAIN DEWATERING BAG
STREAM BED
FILTER FABRIC
15' to 20'
10'
15'
BAG PLACED ON
AGGREGATED OR STRAW.
HIGH STRENGTH
DOUBLE STITCHED
"J" TYPE SEAMS.
SEWN IN SPOUT
HIGH STRENGTH STRAPPING
FOR HOLDING HOSE
IN PLACE.
FLEXIBLE
DISCHARGE HOSE
WATER FLOW
FROM PUMP
Inset "A"
Dewatering Bag
DEWATERING
BAG
TEMPORARY
SEDIMENT
BASIN
EMERGENCY
SPILLWAY
DAM
Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Details.dwgMarch 7, 20121
6.7
Outlet Protection
Not to Scale
2
6.7
Pump Around System
Not to Scale
3
6.7
Sediment Basin Pumping System
Not to Scale 005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR6.7December 12, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaDetailsTOE OF SLOPE (TYP)TOP OF BANK (TYP)FLOWWORK AREA
20'
20'
INSTALL AND MAINTAIN THREE
CHECK DAMS LOCATED AT
DOWNSTREAM LIMITS OF PROJECT.FLOWTOE OF SLOPE (TYP)NO. 57 STONE
CLASS B
RIPRAP
2' MIN.
3'
NO. 57 STONE 4 INCHES
WIDE ON UPSTREAM FACE
SPILLWAY CREST
CLASS B RIPRAP
Plan View
Top View
Section A-A'
20'20'
CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE
SEDIMENT WHEN DEPTH
REACHES 12".
FLOWWORK
AREA
Profile View
2 3 STREAM
WIDTH
3'
TOE OF SLOPE
CLASS B RIPRAP
TOP OF BANK
6"
Section B-B'
5' MIN.
FLOW
Temporary Rock Sediment Dam
Not to Scale
4
6.7
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTION12"-18"
SEED AND PLAN AS PER
BUFFER RESTORATION SHEET
COMPACTED FILL TO
BE COMPOSED OF SOIL
AND FREE OF DEBRIS AND BRUSH.
OLD CHANNEL TO
BE ABANDONED.
6' MAX. WITH WIRE
ORANGE SAFTY
FENCE
"T" OR "U" POST DRIVEN
MINIMUM OF 18" INTO GROUND
ATTACH SAFETY FENCE
TO METAL POSTS USING
METAL WIRE TIES
4' MIN.
MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS
PHYSICAL PROPERTY TESTS REQUIREMENTS
MATERIAL N/A POLYETHYLENE
RECOMENDED COLOR N/A "INTERNATIONAL ORANGE"
TENSILE YIELD ASTM D638 AVE. 2000 LBS. PER 4' WIDE
ULTIMATE TENSILE STRENGTH ASTM D638 AVE. 2900 LBS. PER 4' WIDE
ELONGATION AT BREAK (%)ASTM D638 GREATER THAN 1000%
CHEMICAL RESISTANCE N/A INERT TO MOST CHEMICALS AND ACIDS
18" MIN.Q:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Details.dwgMarch 7, 2012005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR6.8December 12, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaDetails1
6.8
Ephemeral Pool
Not to Scale
2
6.8
Safety Fence
Not to Scale
12"FILTER FABRIC
12" BASE CLASS A/B STONE
CAPPED WITH 3" #57 STONE
NOTE:
1.FORD CROSSING SHALL BE
INSTALLED PERPENDICULAR TO
CHANNEL BANKS.
Plan View TOP OF BANK16' MIN
MAINTAIN LOW FLOW THALWEG
THROUGH CROSSING
8:1 MA
X
8:1
M
A
X
20' MIN 20' MINTOP OF
BANK
8:1 MAX
20' MIN 20' MIN
4
6.8
Permanent Ford Crossing
Not to Scale
COARSE AGGREGATE 6"MIN. 24" PIPE DIAMETER
1/2 DIAMETER OF PIPE OR 12",
WHICHEVER IS GREATER
EARTH FILL COVERED BY
APPROPRIATELY
LARGE ANGULAR ROCK.FLOWTOP OF BANKTOE OF SLOPETOP OF BANKRIP-RAP COVERED BY
APPROPRIATELY LARGE
ANGULAR ROCK.COARSE AGGERGATE
MIN. 24"PIPEDIAMETER25' MIN.25' MIN.TOE OF SLOPEFLOW3
6.8
Permanent Culvert Crossing
Not to Scale
Plan View
Section View
Section View
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Details.dwgMarch 7, 2012FLOW
A
A'
Plan View
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
TOP
O
F
B
A
N
K
(
T
Y
P
)
TOE
O
F
S
L
O
P
E
(
T
Y
P)
TOE
O
F
S
L
O
P
E (
T
Y
P
)
TOP
O
F
B
A
N
K
(
T
Y
P)
DENSELY PACKED WOODY DEBRIS
BRUSH MATERIAL TO BE INSTALLED
FLUSH WITH BANK
TOP OF BANK (BANKFULL)
Section A-A'
DENSELY PACKED BRUSH, WOODY DEBRIS AND SOIL
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
BACKFILL
TOE OF SLOPE
3'
NATIVE SOILELEV. 6" BELOW
POOL DEPTH
ELEV. 6" ABOVE
DOWNSTREAM
RIFFLE INVERT
NOTES:
1.OVEREXCAVATE 3' OUTSIDE OF TOP OF BANK (BANKFULL).
2.INSTALL BASE LOGS PARALLEL TO FLOW AT TOE OF SLOPE. DIAMETER 6"-12".
3.INSTALL BASE LOGS PERPENDICULAR TO FLOW AT INTERVALS ALONG
BANK, RESTING ON TOP OF PARALLEL BASE LOGS. BASE LOGS SHALL
BE 6"-12” DIAMETER.
4.INSTALL A DENSE LAYER OF BRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS, WHICH SHALL CONSIST OF
SMALL BRANCHES AND ROOTS COLLECTED ON-SITE AND SOIL TO FILL ANY VOID
SPACE. LIGHTLY COMPACT BRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS LAYER.
5.BRUSH SHOULD BE ALIGNED SO STEMS ARE ROUGHLY PARALLEL AND IS
INSTALLED POINTING SLIGHTLY UPSTREAM.
6.INSTALL FILTER FABRIC OVER BRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS.
7.INSTALL EARTH BACKFILL OVER BRUSH/WOODY LAYER ACCORDING TO TYPICAL
SECTION DIMENSIONS.
8.SEED, MULCH AND INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MATTING AND BANK
STABILIZATION PER PLANS.
NOTES:
1.OVEREXCAVATE 3' OUTSIDE OF TOP OF BANK (BANKFULL).
2.INSTALL A DENSE LAYER OF BRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS, WHICH SHALL
CONSIST OF SMALL BRANCHES AND ROOTS COLLECTED ON-SITE AND
SOIL TO FILL ANY VOID SPACE. LIGHTLY COMPACT BRUSH/WOODY
DEBRIS LAYER.
3.BRUSH SHOULD BE ALIGNED SO STEMS ARE ROUGHLY PARALLEL AND
IS INSTALLED POINTING SLIGHTLY UPSTREAM.
4.INSTALL FILTER FABRIC OVER BRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS.
5.INSTALL EARTH BACKFILL OVER BRUSH/WOODY LAYER ACCORDING
TO TYPICAL SECTION DIMENSIONS.
6.SEED, MULCH AND INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MATTING AND BANK
STABILIZATION PER PLANS.
FILTER FABRIC
Plan View
TOP OF BANK (BANKFULL)
Section A-A'
BASE LOG
4"-6" DIAMETER
DENSELY PACKED BRUSH, WOODY DEBRIS AND SOIL
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
BACKFILL
DENSELY PACK BRUSH, WOODY DEBRIS AND SOIL
IN BETWEEN BASE LOGS
BASE LOGS PERPENDICULAR TO FLOW
TOE OF SLOPE
2' MIN
3'
BRUSH MATERIAL TO BE
INSTALLED FLUSH
WITH BANK
FLOW
A
A'
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
TOP
O
F
B
A
N
K (
T
Y
P
)
TOE
O
F
S
L
O
P
E
(
T
Y
P)
TOE
O
F
S
L
O
P
E (
T
Y
P
)
TOP
O
F
B
A
N
K
(
T
Y
P)
BASE LOGS PARALLEL TO FLOW
BACKFILL WITH APPROVED
FILL MATERIAL
NATIVE SOIL
BASE LOG
6-12" DIAMETER
ELEV. 6" BELOW
POOL DEPTH
ELEV. 1' ABOVE
DOWNSTREAM
RIFFLE INVERT
FILTER FABRIC
WIDTH PER TYPICAL SECTIONS
6"
WIDTH PER TYPICAL SECTIONS
6"005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR6.9December 12, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaDetailsBrush Toe - Large Streams
Not to Scale
1
6.9
Brush Toe - Small Streams
Not to Scale
2
6.9
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONQ:\ActiveProjects\005-45005 Yadkin Valley Umbrella Bank\Critcher Bro Site\Cadd\Plans\45005-Details.dwgMarch 7, 2012005-45005JCKJMGT/AA/EGR6.10December 12, 2018Critcher Brothers Mitigation SiteWilkes County, North CarolinaDetailsStabilized Inlet
Not to Scale
1
6.10
MIN DEPTH = 2.0'
WIDTH VARIES
0' - 3'
15"
CLASS A/B RIPRAP
Section A-A'
10.0'
6.0'
1.0'
3.0'
CLASS A/B RIPRAP
2.0'1.0'
NO. 57 STONE
FLOWB B'
A'
A
A'A
Section A-A'
Section B-B'
BMP
BMP
Plan View
Plan View
Rock Weir Outlet
Not to Scale
2
6.10