19890682 Ver 1_Complete File_19890918

it - 11 DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
October 3, 1989
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THROUGH:
Bill Mills, Environmental Engineer
Operations Branch
Roger K. Thorpe;, ?e( Quality Regional Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
FROM: Deborah Sawyer, Environmental Technician
Water Quality Section, WaRO
SUBJECT: DF/CAMA/401 Review
Town of Manteo
Project 400682
Dare County
The above subject document has been reviewed. A site inspectio3t-
performed on 89/08/30. The recommendation for this project is to
issue the 401 Certification with conditions. The conditions are as
follows:
1. To eliminate the proposal to dredge the area by the marsh
between the existing Elizabeth II Channel and the "sewer
dock" (see yellow shaded area on drawing).
2. Dredge depth to a maximum of 8 ft. on other side of "sewer
dock."
3. Monitoring requirement prior to dredging (2 monitoring
sites designated on drawing):
a. Water column analyses for fecal coliform, chromium,
copper, lead, zinc, nickel, mercury, total nitrogen
and total phosphorus.
b. Sediment analyses for fecal coliform, chromium,
copper, lead, zinc, nickel, mercury, total nitrogen
and total phosphorus.
4. Monitoring requirement during dredging: monitor twice
weekly for settleable solids and turbidity in the dredging
area.
5. Monitoring requirements at outfall of diked disposal
area: monitor 1 time during discharge for fecal coliform,
chromium, copper, lead, zinc, nickel, mercury, total
nitrogen and total phosphorus.
This office is of the opinion that dredging in this area could
potentially cause contravention of water quality standards, as well
as potential adverse effects to the adjoining wetlands. The area
which is requested to be eliminated is deeper (9') than the
surrounding waters (2'). The area in close proximity to the
discharge pipe at the "sewer dock" is a potential problem for
adverse affects of water quality.
DS/cm
1
? s

M
r. •

x
. H
Q
W
A
H
z
w
U
h
A
Qi
O
? w
w
fy H
? W
W
w x
c7 ca
A
W A
tx W
A x
U
A ?
W H
? H
O ?
W
O W
W' W
W V]

.:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor October 19, 1989 R. Paul Wilms
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: John
FROM: Bill
SUBJECT: Appl
Town
Dare
Parker
Millsy
icatio//n for CAMA Permit
of Manteo
County
The Subject application has been reviewed for water quality
impacts and the following comments are offered:
a) The proposed project does require a Water Quality
Certification but does meet. the requirements of General
Certification No. 1273 for discharge of liquid effluent
from an upland diked disposal area.
b) It is recommended that dredging between the existing
Elizabeth II Channel and the "sewer dock" not be
allowed. It is further recommended that dredging on the
other side of the "sewer dock" be limited to a maximum
depth of 8 feet. Our field office is of the opinion
that dredging in this area could cause contravention of
water quality standards as well as possible adverse
effects on the adjoining wetlands. The area requested
for dredging to not be allowed is deeper (9 feet) than
the surrounding waters (2 feet). The area in proximity
to the discharge pipe at the "sewer dock" is an area
which has a potential for adverse effects on water
quality.
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An F-iial 0--ortunity Affirmative Action Emalover
i
i
John Parker
October 19, 1989
Page Two
C) It is recommended that monitoring before dredging be
conducted as follows at two sites:
One time for the following in the water column:
fecal coliform, chromium, copper, lead, zinc, nickel,
mercury, total nitrogen and total phosphorous.
One time for the following in the sediment: fecal
coliform, chromium, copper, lead, zinc, nickel, mercury,
total nitrogen and total phosphorus.
d) It is recommended that monitoring during dredging
be conducted as follows in the area being dredged:
Twice weekly for the following: settleable solids
and turbidity.
e) It is recommended that monitoring of the effluent from the
diked disposal area be conducted as follows:
One time during discharge for the following: fecal
coliform, chromium, copper, lead, zinc, nickel, mercury,
total nitrogen and total phosphorus.
f) A location map is attached showing the area not to be
dredged in yellow and the location of sample points for
samples recommended in (c) above.
BM/kls
Manteo.mem/D-3
cc: Jim Mulligan
SEP 1989
A- ,
WATER QUAUTY
it I•::'`}A T r::-?
OF/CAMA/401 RE',..' DATE 09/18/e9
NRT17l ENTERED THIS DATA,
t.:.., .... ,.., ...
,!..it
.,: i..... 00682 ,. ? ?::?1':1.1,1: •?•G:•G:iN OF !"iAN•i .:.t..
ASSIGNED TO, DAE
FORMAT
RECORD IS NO 00682
COUNTY
?.t :I: its i NOTICE
: R{1t"?.:{•ar9A NEXT i°;{_.: 1.-'
FRD DATA
DARE? REGION: 0*'?
N
TYPE CER TIFICA TION RECOMMEND Tr...,:: `) •i e:,.1....

CAMA ONLY: GC: DIKED D!Si::: DENY: INITIAL REPORT:
DF/CAMA: Y SEC P: SWPREQ: N HOLD: FINAL REPORT: 0909o!'...,
STREAM:
!"IN::.t.?i::..l.+U.I.fl:r SHALL OW +: ir•'G J:i?::}'?' CLASS: 'C BASIN: I"' t::'{ E
r•
COMMENTS:
SITE LOCATED #'$1: 4y::; 0
IN S
EWER DECK A!'•'.I:::A;
':: l°`Al...;...t.: WBAG BAY
PROPOSAL TO DREDGE 2.55 s°?{...i'':1::.S t°Yi...ta....r : 'Si:. i'ii:i;NT,...'.t WATERFRON T 'i•t.t .. DEPTH i OF
SITE INVESTIGATION ON 8 /30/89
RECOMMENDATION OF ISSUANCE WITH CONDI TIONS
SEE ATTACHED MEMOR ANDUM FOR CONDITION.' .'..'.'
r
OFFICE OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT Lat:35054130"
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT Long: 75°jgcv?vgp
WASHINGTON OFFICE
1. APPLICANT'S NAME Town of Manteo AUL-3 Wg
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE
NC400. Manteo,_Dare Coun
Sewer Deck Ar
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: DREDGE & FILL x CANA x
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE:
`(A) DATES OF SITE VISIT 7-26-89'
(B) WAS APPLICANT PRESENT no
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: APPLICATION RECEIVED 7-19-89
OFFICE Elizabeth City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION: (A) LOCAL LAND USE PLAN Manteo
LAND CLASSIFICATION FROM LUP developed
DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS IDENTIFIED IN LUP NA
(B) AEC(S) INVOLVED: OCEAN HAZARD ESTUARINE SHORELINE x
COASTAL WETLANDS PUBLIC TRUST WATERS x
ESTUARINE WATERS x OTHER
(C) WATER DEPENDENT: YES x NO OTHER
(D) INTENDED USE: PUBLIC X PRIVATE COMMERCIAL
(E)
(F)
TYPE OF WASTE WATER TREATMENT: EXISTING NA
PLANNED
TYPE OF STRUCTURES:
PLANNED
(G) ESTIMATED ANNUAL RATE OF EROSION NA SOURCE,
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION:

(A) VEGETATED WETLANDS
I
(B) NON-VEGETATED WETLANDS:
a
AREA
DREDGED FILLED OTHER
(C) OTHER:
soft bottom habitat 111,250sq.ft
(D) TOTAL AREA DISTURBED:
8. PROJECT SUMMARY:
the Manteo waterfront
EXISTING "Sewer Dock" with finger piers
licant
111,250 sq. ft
to dredge 2.55 acres a
Shallowbag Bay
Bio Report
July 31, 1989
SITE INVESTIGATION
The applicant proposes to dredge 2.55 acres along the Manteo
waterfront to a depth of 9 feet below NWL. The area is bisected
by the "sewer dock," a 300 foot pier to the municipal sewage
treatment plant. Several finger piers extend off of the pier,
which is available for public dockage. Water depths along this
pier were approximately 4.5 feet. A second pier terminating in a
gazebo bounds one edge of the dredge site. The water under this
pier was 8.5 feet deep 60 feet offshore and 11 feet deep 110 feet
offshore. Water depths surrounding the area to be dredged vary
considerably, from 2 to 13 feet. The existing channel for the
Elizabeth II bisects the proposed dredge site at a depth of 13
feet. It decreases to 8 feet beyond the sewer dock. A 12 foot
channel bounds the area near the gazebo pier. Near a natural
shore vegetated with marsh plants, water depth is 2 feet.
Most of the shoreline along the dredge site is riprapped
with masonry debris. 'Approximately 220 feet of shoreline is not -
hardened, and supports a variety of wetland plant species.
ANTICIPATED IMPACTS
The area would be dredged to a depth of 9 feet. Dredging to
this depth in close proximity to wetland vegetation could cause
sloughing of the vegetation and natural shoreline. Gently
sloping the bottom away from the natural shoreline would minimize
this problem. The dredging will disturb the bottom and
temporarily increase water turbidity. No rooted submerged
aquatic vegetation was observed. Some loose strands were
observed floating by the piers.
M The dredge spoil would be deposited on existing spoilsites
at Pirates Cove. The spoil disposal should have minimal
environmental impact beyond that already occuring at the spoil
site.
CAMA Review
The site is classified as Developed in the Manteo Land Use
Plan. The proposed dredging is consistent with the Land Use
Plan.
Submitted: T. Gray Hauser, Jr.?
Date: July 31, 1989
tea`
4>
e
?. 00.
°0
DEPTHS ADJACENT TO PROPOSED DREDGE SITE

• I a?SU17gv
ww
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Coastal Management
Highway 17 South • Elizabeth City, North Carolina 27909
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Parker
FROM: Gray Hauser 0-15..9/1
WW.
SUBJECT: Town of Manteo
Shallowbag Bay/Sewer Dock Dredging Site
Dare County
DATE: July 31, 1989
George T. Everett
Director
I recommend the permit be issued with the following special
and standard conditions.
To protect wetlands from erosion, dredge excavation in
waters adjacent to vegetated wetlands shall be sloped at a 4:1
ratio, (4 units horizontal distance waterward to 1 unit vertical
increase in depth).
D&F (1) In order to protect juvenile and fin fish populations,
no excavation or filling will be permitted between
April 1 and September 30 of any year without the prior
approval of the Division of Coastal Management.
D&F (2) The excavation will be conducted below the normal water
level.
D&F (3) Excavation will not exceed 9 feet below the normal
water level.
D&F (4) No marsh grass will be excavated and/or filled.
D&F (5) The temporary placement or double handling of excavated
or fill materials within waters or vegetated wetlands
is not authorized.
D&F (6) The disposal area effluent will be contained by pipe,
trough or similar device to a point at or below the
normal water level to prevent gully erosion and
Route 6 Box 203, Elizabeth City, North Carolina 27909 Telephone [phone]
An Fg11,,1 Om)nrtunity Affirmativc A, rion Fmplovcr
John Parker
Memo
July 31, 1989
Page two
unnecessary siltation.
D&F (7) The terminal end of the pipeline will be positioned at
or greater than fifty (50) feet from any part of the
dike and a maximum distance from spillways to allow
settlement of suspended solids.
D&F (8) A water control structure will be installed at the
intake end of the effluent pipe to assure compliance
with water quality standards.
D&F (9) The diked disposal area will be constructed a
sufficient distance from the mean high water level or
any marsh to eliminate the possibility of dike erosion
into or upon any marsh and/or surrounding waters.
D&F (10) All excavated materials will be confined above mean
high water and landward of regularly or irregularly
flooded marsh behind adequate dikes or other retaining
structures to prevent spill-over of solids into any,
marsh or surrounding waters.

case type or print. Carefully describe all anticipated
velopment activities, including construction, excava-
-n, filling, paving, land clearing, and stormwater con-
,1. If the requested information is not relevant to your
eject, write N/A.(not applicable). Items 1-4 and 8-9
List be completed for all projects.
APPLICANT
Name Town of Manteo
Address P.O. Box 246
City Manteo State Nr:
Zip 27954 Day phone [phone]
X Landowner or Authorized agent
Project name (if any) Shallowbat Bay/
Sewer Dock Dredging
if you plan to build a marina, also complete and
attach Form DCM-MP-2.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an
existing project, new work, or both?
mainrpn^nnp
c. Will the project be for community, private, or
commercial use?
community
d. Describe the planned use of the project.
deepening the area around the Municipal
pier so as to safely accommodate the
expected increase in vessels visiting
Manteo as a result of the North Channel
dredging
'g LAND AND WATER
If the applicant is not the landowner, also give the CHARACTERISTICS
owner's name and address. dred a site - approx 2 acres
n/a a. Size of entire tract aSu i f Sire-- annrny ' 9n arreS
LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
Street address or secondary road number
southend of Queen glizahprh S reet
11,
b. Size of Individual lot(s)
n/a
c. Elevation of tract above mean sea level or
National Geodetic Vertical Datum
spoil site 3' _ 5'
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
spoil site - sandy loam - -
e. Vegctationon tract n/a
City; town, community, or landmark f
_ Mant e o
County
Dare
1s proposed work widiin city limits or planning
jurisdiction? ye s
Name of body of water nearest project
Shallowba- Bay
DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
9.
area to be used as
Man-made features now on tract a spoil site is
currently being used as a CAMA approved spoi
What is the CAMA Land Use Plan Classification of site
the site? (Consult the local land use plan.)
Conservation Transitional
X Developed Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local govenunent?
n/a _
1. How are adjacent waters classified?
Describe all development activities you propose (for j.
example, building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead,
or pier). deepen area around Municipal •e1
for public boat dockage
sC -
Has a professional archaeological survey been
carried out for the tract? No If so, by whom?
5 UPLAND DEVELOPMENT
Complete this section if the project includes any land
development.
a. Type and number of buildings, facilities, or
structures proposed NA
b. Number of lots or parcels NA
c. Density (Give the number of residential units and the
units per acre.) NA
d. Size of area to be graded or disturbed
NA
e. If the proposed project will disturb more than one
acre of land, the Division of Land.Resources must
receive an erosion and sedimentation control plan at
least 30 days before land disturbing activity begins.
If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion
control plan been submitted to the Division of Land
Resources? NA
f. Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet of
mean high water to be covered by impermeable
surfaces, such as pavement, buildings, rooftops.
NA
g. List the materials, such as marl, paver stone, asphalt,
or concrete, to be used for paved surfaces.
NA
h. If applicable, has a stormwater management plan
been submitted to the Division of Environmeptal
Management? NA
I. Describe proposed sewage disposal and/or waste
water treatment facilities.
NA
j. Have these facilities received state or local approval?
NA
k. Describe existing treatment facilities.
NA
1. Describe location and type of discharges to waters of
the state (for example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down"). NA
I
in. Water supply source
NA-
n. If the project is oceanfront development. describe
the steps that will be taken to maintain established
public beach accessways or provide new access.
NA
o. If the project is on the oceanfront, what will be the
elevation above mean sea level of the first habitable
floor? NA
6 EXCAVATION AND FILL
INFORMATION
a. Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation
or fill activities (excluding bulkheads, which are
covered in Section 7).
Access channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
east side
Boat basin west side
west of channel
Other (break-
water, pier,
boat ramp,
rock jetty)
Fill placed in
wetland or below
MHW
Upland fill
areas
Length Width Depth
ZU5
225 90' 9'
120' Q
b. Amount of material to be excavated from below
water level in cubic yards 10, 000 - 15, Q00
c. Typeofmaterial ,.Fine mate'r.ial, silty sand
d. Does the area to be excavated include marshland,
swamps, or other wetlands?
No
e. High ground excavation, in cubic yards
NA

f Dimensions of spoil disposal area
approximately 1375' x 275'
g. Location tof spoil disposal area
Balast Point Pirates Cove
h. Do you claim title to the disposal area? No
if not, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
i. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance?
If so, where?
j. Does the disposal area include any marshland,
swamps, or water areas?
No
k.
1.
in.
n.
c. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months, in
feet NA
d. Type of bulkhead material
NA
e. Amount of fill, in cubic yards, to be placed below
mean high water NA
f. Type of fill material
NA
8 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the follow-
ing items must be submitted:
Will the fill material be.placed below mean high A copy of the deed (with state application only) or.other
water? No instrument under which the applicant claims title to the
Amount of fill in cubic yards 10, 000 - 15 , 000 affected property. If the applicant is not claiming to be
the owner of said property, then forward a copy of the
Type of fill material fine- material. m ilt y ganddeed or other instrument under which the owner claims
title, plus written permission from the owner to cant' out
Source of fill material Dredging project the project.
o. Will fill material be placed on marsh or other
wetlands? No
p. Dimensions of the wetland to be filled
NA
q. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled?
Existing dike system (site currently
in use for a different CAMA approved
project)
r. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)?_hWdrn,ji io drpdgp
s. Wi11 wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? _N-o-- If yes, -explain steps that will
be taken to lessen environmental impacts.
7 SHORELINE STABILIZATION
a. Length of bulkhead or riprap NA
b. Average distance waterward of mean high water or
normal water level NA
An accurate work plat (including plan view a4cross
sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black ink ;on an 8
1/2 x 11 white paper. (Refer to Coastal Resources.
Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred-and.
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if 18 high
quality copies are provided by applicant. (Contact the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding that agency's
use of larger drawings.) A site or location map is a part
of plat requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed
to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with die area to the
site. Include county road (SR) numbers, landmarks, and
the like.
A stormwater management plan, if applicable, that
may have been developed in consultation with the
Division of Environmental Management.
A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners. These
individuals have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management and should be advised by the applicant of
that opportunity.
* Balast Point may be available for 2-5 years
but then may have to seek maintenance alternati-
such as trucking, or another site.
Varrte. Harry Schif fman _
Address c/o Salty Dawg Marina 9 CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
. Manteo. NC 27954 TO ENTER ON LAND
lame Ray Hollowell
address Renaissance Dev. Corp.
P.O. Box 1411
Manteo, NC 27954
lame Buell and Janie Ke it h
Address 1434 W 36th Street
San Pedro CA 90731
Any permit issued in response to this application will
allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to conditions and restrictions
contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's ap-
proved Coastal Management Program and will be con
A list of previous state or federal permits issued for ducted in a manner consistent with such program.
Nork on the project tract. Include permit numbers, .
)ermittee, and issuing dates. I further certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in
#100-80 NC Dent of Natural 1RQgmirCP- a14d fact, grant permission to representatives of state and
Comm. Dev. and Coastal Resources Commission. federal review agencies to enter on the aforementioned
6/1/89 lands in connection with evaluating information related
to this permit application and follow-up monitoring of
A check for $100 made payable to the Department of , project.
natural Resources and Community Development to
:over the costs of processing the application.
A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront
uid inlet areas.
A statement on the use of public funds. If the project
involves the expenditure of public funds, attach a state-
ment documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to 10).
This is the day of
X (?,.
Landowner or Authorized agent
r
Sound Si
9 O ?.
Y 7
7 O 6?
_ .. s?., Light
7 U
3
2
1\ \
Town o-F /1IA?,feo
1 // w 6a? •?a?. ?.se CO- 40o c,E Qi w els .'.,3 .S• r`e
J
• Man Xc 0.1 .v L'. pew
tt o / ?13 ?• • rv
t1. \• . Y
?! ?? • of SY_in ar\\
s d`\ Baum oint a ? `?.•
Light \?
w s
s
!r •?ti?: to ABM Fly. 1YO u 7 ' 1
• •-?:: -?0?t
%
li /'; -? •: •,• :: e^? Ballast \
o .
it „ s= ?II% , Q
'i?, l? li'. ? ? rt="??. •:? ??,."` .?. -.,. //?w? Point
u? t`• 4 ? ??? .? /'? /v j 'w.,,•. Sand Point oLight
4
"?: ??a••. ?•? Sh/a'llo wbagBay
;
` \ ••?• Light
s. •.:oy? e nl
b Ijavel
ali `i•• • '?6? •?ii? s r ',
•% l • Wit -
rl
• ', Light Fields
Manteo\
\
1128 c ;;,' Site ? a r' ?1 ? y.w. 0
Turn., • ?\ w ` y...... _
Bow
.... S .. L A
R
O .K E

? b
t? ,n
r? o
b
a o
H CIO
H Cr1
a d
n
x C7
w
d
d
x m
tai
t=i a
H iU
C17
? a
0
7d '
'b
a
n
tr1
z
H
d
Cr1
ro
H '
x

/
1
i ?
i`hl;CIS
?L
,?-'1ll
V
?Y
s ?
\
0 z
9 p H
?
• ?
1y C7 _ _ --
J 0

„
I r
0
m'
' ' r: Do U N m
w a z m
0 R m
?N 5 ?. W N

'
` E4
? 0 a
a w
' r o
?
r a z
'
? ? +r ff
'
d J Hy M CI
G W
k4 E-4

17
.

)L m

i
p
`c aa
m
c
3 as
X
m

A h .+ a
i
e
.4 4
0
z -44 $4

i
4.13
.443 w
A t
4 0
m -va
? .4m w 0 ++ aE v
_ _ _
C0 ?ma 1+w ,4 E.4 0 w A _
1 -
N 47 4J.
0 -4 p .1
o m 0 • 3 4) .4 4j v
w
4 3w 0 m o,m oC
'X a0-4 m0A ?OYdGO w ?w ?

N vvRl CCC ?O+?E v44
e
I I xro -P 41 $4 o ro 0 w w 0 m

I
!
? rom>
c rd ++c3
3? 4+ CtTa-+ w
??a m ° to 7C
y
0 v
E

rlt
N ?
' w-14.9
A ro
rod
10
0 v
4 .
$
4m?aw A -
4
wV .
,
, 4J ? ?r1
0 0
0,
0 C
3

I o! is _ =
?
44 r4 0 y v
la va x x 14 + o +1
tnmvx v 4+ m w
CO 10
C
Q
0
3
0
m
0
0
0 4) to
3 I V 0
?
9)4
)'0 -1 C-
4
.
4
vrom4.) -
4C44
0V 14
34)0cw ro 04) w
m0(a
uv

z .
a W.C 0 C.Q0 aE 044E >C afL

j
-
t I 0=0 a-4 d wCd 0 •C O0w -4

c
`
1 x
Z
H ! 41-414 +I
co 'n row
10 m
4E roo+roroxw 4)
4v0w
4
? E00 roa

Y! j d
x
p 11
O
1

10
vwv- ?
aa-40 "
-
-
m-4m•0M 3
mar. v
my
?
13 ?rox.4
1 30 -4aCmAx .0 0 00

4
E-4
o v v0mw ++v -44Ja va
P,ri
0C:V "c
/? I I C43 br xCtU-4 XEIAmA u3 Yva v-4
? ° 01
x m
0
IN I ! roro0 1
row-
c 4TO43411
-
?4 4s m00 VE
/ „ ! mGl0 04-3 m+lv Um -4 w4 00
I I >rawv
a 0 ab 44V
0r4 C C? ov m 0
3 m0 - N m a
m d 0u
44
?) I 30 -4 -4 •0 00 4J 0- 14 a CL OC w
P ro-4 .+m co mma xs+J oHN m -440 04-)
P ama,+ C Ca m mC ro Cl. m
D 0 m0 0a0 7 as 44@ tn>4 00
?S I ?l $4 00 -4 -im m ••nm 4) 4J NCC 0C
V 4) 4J tO CD r-4 to 4) ?4 it -,-1 41
k
(? 1
g - a -4 my 0>0a x•4vx>41 4•r0
4 X
4 C ow
I .4 0 -4 .C v a v w ,4. C -4 -
m •.i 0 0 C - C S
• - !- I '
I N 4 4J V 4J N ,C, m ON 0 0 r-I TJ 0 -4 H E •.i U 44

- z .•4 N rl e' in %D
> ? >
w o I

w
r
• • •' ??
•`•• , `
Oro
ilA
?? ?-?- - -.? • v .
jf IV
.? ??: = ? mow. •. ? ??
lob
wet,
.., •.
...%
N
move