Ver _Complete File_19891103

9101--££L-616 auoydalaj_ L89L-1I9LZ eullaeJ 4410N '4913lq 'L89LZ Xo$ 'O•d
PaPMOg uOgsazd :00
E-a/a4T •uizadPUIPD
STx/wg
•gaaj OZ jo ggdap
p og pazp aop;.znsgns aqq ;o uoTgdTaosap STTOS PUP OTboToabO.zpAq
buTpnTOUT ubTSap buTzaauTfiua agaTduioO uodn paspq paMOTTV
aq pTnogs gTULTed p pup uiagsAs jo adAq stgq 109 aTgpgTns ST agrS
aqq gpgq 9pnT0uO0 og OTgpuospoa ST qT papTAOad uoTgpuiaoguT aqq
uodn paspg •paTJTguapT SPGaP aqq uTggTM UI94SAS P 90 uOTgpTTpgsuT
JO; pupT quaTOTJIns aq APw aaagg gpgq sivaddp qT 4Pgq
papnT0uo0 anpq`Aags •saT4TTTOp9 pasodoid aqq aoj uoTgpuz.zoguT
STTOS PUP SupTd agTS paMaTnaz Spq aOT990 pTaTj anp •uOTSTATa
STg4 ggTM apTsaa TTTM K4Taoggnp gTuzaad aqq snug pup A4TTT4n
3TTgnd P Sp pagp.aado aq TTTM AgTTTDPJ sTgq gEgq pupgs.zapun
MOLL aM • qOa Co.zd sTgq 109 W94SAS TpsodsTp abpMas pasodoad
aqq oq anTgpTaz uOT4PWI03uT TpuoTgTppp panT@DGJ aApq aM
Aqunoo gaaaq.Zpo
uOTgpOT;TPON g0p9g ppozg
4TWa9d F WVD ao;rr??!luoTgpOTTddK : soarans
,; : sTTTw eor =wox3
q .
.zax.zpa = oil
waaNvaowaw
.104aa.z!Q 686T IC a aquianoN kma;).o3s '•.t j 'A3goD A we1[[!A&
sual!A\ Ined 21 lou.lanoD 'u!;.leN same j
119LZ eu!10-'L':) uoN 142!aled . aaauS Ajngs!jeS T-ION Zt5
4uau.la2eUl2N Ie;uaulu0.11nu3 Jo uo!s!n!Q
sDDjnosa-d Ivinat?N put VFW )N `IuaLUUOZinu3 30 4u;)wl daQ
Pu'IOJL'D TJON 30 --)'IS
a4 2? vy??
IJ
Fei'¢ ?vM Q^?
b ?? IY
`+M 3Y e ? ? ?
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
October 16, 1989
Mr. Lawrence R. Zucchino
Patton/Zucchino & Associates, P. A.
Cooper Square
17 Glenwood Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Subject: Broad Reach
Carteret County
Dear Mr. Zucchino:
Bob Jamieson
Regional Manager
?C
t• X1989
nj7 ?R QG? ?,-
n??7o
Your letter concerning proposed wastewater treatment
facilities for the Broad Reach Development was received October
5, 1989, accompanied by site plans and additional information.
The submittal indicates that a tertiary treatment plant with low
pressure pipe subsurface disposal is to be installed, with a
design capacity of 171,880 GPD. Based on a design application
rate of 0.5 GPD/sq. ft. approximately 16 acres of suitable land
would be required for disposal field construction and repair
area.
Sheet 1 of the plans indicates placement of a disposal
system within Parcel F plus an additional 12 acre "reserve area"
in Parcel D. Based on the recommendations contained in the
attached soil scientists report it appears that there may be
sufficient suitable land for installation of a system within
these parcels. Please be advised, however, that the minimum
setback from property lines is 50 feet and not 20 feet as
specified on the plans. Further evaluation of the site may
indicate that setbacks in excess of 50 feet are required.
7225 Wrightsville Avenue, Wilmington, N.C. 28403-3696 • Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Mr. Lawrence R. Zucchino
Page -2-
Additional information will also be required in order to
determine the suitability of the site. A hydrogeologic and soils
description of the subsurface to a depth of 20 feet is required.
The number of borings shall be sufficient to determine
significant changes in lithology underlying the site, the
vertical permeability of the unsaturated zone and the hydraulic
conductivity of the saturated zone and the depth to the mean
seasonal high water table. A determination of transmisivity and
specific yield of the unconfined aquifer based on withdrawal or
recharge tests will also be required. If the lithology is
determined to be similar to the site where pump tests were done
to support the stormwater application, then this data may be
used.
In order to support a permit application for the proposed
project, complete plans and specifications must be submitted as
well as a check in the amount of $250 for the processing fee.
If you have any questions please call Mr. Ed Beck or me at
[phone].
Si;Preston rely,
A. How rd, Jr. P.E.
Regional Supervisor
EB:BROAD.OCT
cc: Rick Shiver
WiRo, CF
PATON / ZUCCHINO
& ,\S'S OCa TFS.VA.
October 2, 1989
Mr. Donald Safrit
N.C. Division of Environmental Management
Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources
7225 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Re: Broad Reach CAMA Permit Request
Dear Mr. Safrit:
yue.ig Buimeld ?
lllld(lb Y3l?t,^": N
a='Aa?? ='?c w
6864100 c?
I spoke with John Parker NCDCM today concerning the Broad
Reach CAMA permit request. He asked that I contact you
regarding the proposed wastewater collection and disposal
system for the project. Please be advised that the applicant
plans to operate the wastewater system as a public utility
and will seek a wastewater discharge permit from NCDEM once
final utility construction drawings are prepared for the
project.
I have enclosed for your review a number of documents which
may be helpful. Of particular relevance is the April 5, 1989
field soil investigation by a certified professional Soil
Scientist which recommends wastewater loading rates.for the
soils designated for wastewater disposal.
Please contact me if you require any further information or
clarification.
Very truly yours,
Lawrenc R. Zucchino
4V& &
Paton/Zucchino & Associates, P.A.
cc: John Parker, NCDCM
Bill Mills, NCDEM
Attachments: Carteret County sewer facilities form
NCDHS water supply review letter
DCDLR erosion control approval letter
NCDEM stormwater approval letter Land Planning
Soil investigation report Landscape Architecture
Cooper Square
17 Glenwood Ave.
Raleigh,N.C. 27603
919-834-8620
FAX-919-828-7068
Ile
?r`Y vu,N,1.ncaw' ..,State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor October r 4, 1.9 8 9 R. Paul Wiims
Wiliam W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
TO: George Everett
FROM: Paul Wilms '. ? ?-
SUBJECT: Application for Modified CAMA Permit
Broad Reach Investments, Carteret County
We have completed our review of the Subject application for
potential water quality impacts and the following comments are
offered:
a. The proposed project will require a Water Quality
Certification but does meet the requirements of General
Certifications Nos. 1273 and 1431 for discharge of liquid
effluent from a diked disposal area resulting from
hydraulic dredging and for placement of fill from
construction of boat ramps, respectively.
b. The proposed project construction should be done in such
a way as to not cause turbidity outside of the immediate
construction area to exceed 25 NTU. An earthen plug
should be maintained in the channel during excavation of
the basin and the majority of the channel to minimize
turbidity impacts in adjacent waters.
c. The stormwater management plan for this project was
approved on September 8, 1989 in conformity with 15 NCAC
2.H .1000.
d. This Division has not received any specific information
on the wastewater disposal for this project. The
applicant has indicated that a tertiary treatment plant
with subsurface disposal would be provided. This type of
system must be permitted by DEM or DHS depending on
whether the owner of the system will be a public utility.
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Fni,ai nnnnrh miiv A(flrmafnin AeHnn Fmnlmn r
rI
MEMO TO: George Everett
October 4, 1989
Page Two
e. We would like to clarify our position on dredge and fill
activities in Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) in light
of Todd Miller's letter of September 16, 1989 to you
regarding this permit modification. First, it should be
noted that while the ORW rules include an explicit
statement regarding dredge and fill activities, this
statement is a description of existing procedures for
handling dredge and fill activities in all coastal
waters. It was determined that these existing procedures
would be adequate to also protect ORWs, and they were
included in the rules to clarify this point, not to add
additional restrictions.
Second, we defer to the appropriate resource agency to
make the determination of whether "significant shellfish
or submerged aquatic vegetation bed resources" occur
where any new dredging is proposed. Obviously new
channels should be located to minimize their impacts to
existing resources, and it is the resource agency which
has the expertise to determine whether a channel location
can be found which has no significant impact.
Based on the above points, the modified permit would not
be inconsistent with the ORW rules if the resource
aaencies determine that the new channel location results
in equal or less impact to existing resources as the
original channel location. It should also be noted as
stated by Todd Miller, that the ORW rules for this area
are not anticipated to be effective until January 1,
1990.
To follow up on this last point, we would like to clarify
the procedure outlined by the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) in addressing projects being reviewed
before an ORW designation takes place. The EMC adopted
Guidelines for the Designation of Outstanding Resource
Waters in Coastal North Carolina on July 14, 1989. These
guidelines state that "any permit application which has
been filed and accepted as complete by DEM or CRC prior
to the acceptance by the EMC of the designated body of
water as a candidate for ORW should continue to be
processed through the normal procedural channels. No
action may be taken by the EMC during the time that the
area is being formally considered that would preclude
designation of the proposed area as ORW". This area was
accepted by the EMC as a candidate for ORW on September
8, 1988. Therefore, complete applications received
before that date need not consider ORW requirements and
applications received after January 1, 1990 must conform
to the ORW requirements. Complete applications received
'r
MEMO TO: George Everett
October 4, 1989
Page Three
between the two dates may be processed and approved if
they would not jeopardize the ORW designation.
This Division, therefore, has no objection to this
modification requested unless: 1) The Division of
Environmental Health.determines that an automatic closure of
productive shellfishing areas would be required; or 2) the
Division of Marine Fisheries determines that the dredging of the
entrance channel would remove a significant shellfish resource.
If either of these occur this Division would object to issuance
of the modification.
PW:BM:AK/jho
cc: Alan Klimek
Preston Howard
ge.mem/d-1

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
MEMORANDUM
Date; October 2, 1989
To: Bill Mills
Planning Br nch
From: Don Safri
James H. Gregson
Wilmington Regional e
Through: Preston Howard
Wilmington Regions Office
Subject: Regional Office Review and Recommendations
Application for Permit for Excavation and/or Fill
Project # 8908-A
Broad Reach Investments, Inc.
Carteret County
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposed is Phase I of the Broad Reach
subdivision, 156 acres of 271 acres, to consist of 174
single-family lots and 173 attached units; 75 slip highground
marina basin with a 350' X 60' entrance channel and a 750' X 60'
highground access channel; 195 slip drystack; community center;
and two access piers 200' and 3001.
ADJACENT WATER BODY: Bogue Sound
CLASSIFICATION: SA
STATUS: OPEN
The project has been reviewed to determine impacts to water
quality. The following comments have been provided.
1. The project will require a 401 Water Quality Certification.
2. The project complies with the General 401 Water Quality
Certification No. 1273 for the discharge of liquid effluent
from a diked disposal area resulting from hydraulic
dredging, and Certification No. 1431 for boat ramp
construction.
3. An'earthen plug shall be maintained in the channel during
excavation of the basin and the majority of the channel.
4. The proposed project should be done in such a way as to not
cause the turbidity outside the immediate construction area
to exceed 25 NTU.
f
I
8908-A.SEP
Page Two
5. A stormwater management plan has been approved for this
project.
6. A4r this time no information has been received by this office
concerning wastewater disposal. The proposed tertiary
package treatment plant with subsurface disposal would
require a either a State Non-discharge Permit issued by DEM
or a permit issued by the local health department or DHS.
The project was issued CAMA Permit No. 120-88 on June 29,
1988 for the the subdivision development and marina basin with
entrance channel along Alignment 'B' off Saunders Bay. With the
current application the channel would be constructed along the
alignment of Alternative 'A' off the AIWW. The new proposal
would reduce the direct impact on clam habitat from 66,000 sq.
ft. to 21,000 sq. ft. This office has no objection to this
modification request unless: 1) DHS determines that an automatic
closure of productive shellfish areas would be required; or 2)
DMF determines that the dredging of the entrance channel would
remove a significant shellfish resource. If either of these
occur this office would recommend denial of the project.
JHG:8908-A.SEP
cc: DCM - James L. Mercer
WiRO, CF

NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL FEDERATION
adnot Creek Farm • 3223-4 Highway 58 • Swanaboro, North Carolina 28584 • [phone]
H
21
18 1989
September 16,1989
George Everett
NC Division of Coastal Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
Dear George:
11??iI? ? ??,
S E s, ? OIfIMIEVE SERVICES SECTMA
f'

Please consider these comments in regard to Broad Reach's latest
application to modify its permit. Our comments regarding this
application include:
(1) Include by reference all our previous comments made in regard
to this project which are in earlier permit files;
(2) Include by reference all previous public and agency comments
in regard to this project which are in earlier permit files;
(3):. oject proposal violates new ORW regulations just adopted for
western Bogue Sound. Rule 15 NCAC 2B .0216(c)(2) now states
that "No dredge or fill activities will be allowed where
significant shellfish or submerged aquatic vegetation bed
resources occur except for maintenance dredging..." This
rule should preclude any expansion of the permitted- marina
facility. The proposed channel alignment has been documented
to have a signficant shellfish resource by the NC Division of
Marine Fisheries. While the new ORW regulations do not take
effect until January 1, you know from your experience at DEM
'that the state is required to protect existing uses Re h as
,the ORW resource values) regardless of when the n s take
effect. Thus, loss of this resource to dredging a
violation of state water quality standards which.you are required
'by CAMA regulations to enforce.
(4) The road leading to the waterfront development is currently a
small.farm road that passes through 404 wetlands. No provisions
in this application have been made to deal with filling activities
that will be required to construct a road to this project.
It.is clear that this new proposal violates the dredging limitations
just adopted by the EMC. Please refer to Jim Rennedy',s letter of
January 21, 1989 in regard to additional problems posed by this
project. We ask you do deny this permit modification request.
Please notify us immediately of any actions taken in regard to this
project.
printed on recycled paper
w, y
Page Two
Comments on Broad Reach
September 16, 1989
Thank you for considering these comments.
Sincerely,
Todd Miller
Executive Director
cc: Paul Wilms
Bill Hogarth
Bill Mills
Corps of Engineers
discharges will be permitted, and stormwater controls for
all new development activities requiring a
Sediment/Erosion Control Plan will be required as follows:
(A) Low density Option: Developments which limit single
family developments to one acre lots and other type
developments to 12% built-upon area,. have no stormwater
collection system as defined in 15 NCAC 2H .1002(13),
and have built-upon areas at least 30 feet from surface
water areas will be deemed to comply with this
requirement.
(B) High Density Development: Higher density developments
will be allowed if stormwater control systems utilizing
wet detention ponds as described in 15 NCAC 2H
.1003(i), (k) and (1) are installed, operated and
maintained which control the runoff from all built-upon
areas generated from one inch of rainfall. The size of
the control system must take into account the runoff
from any pervious surfaces draining to the system.
More stringent requirements may be required by the Environmental
Management Commission on a site specific basis.
(2) Saltwater: Water quality conditions shall clearly maintain
and protect the outstanding resource values of waters
classified ORW. Management strategies.to protect resource
values will be developed on a site-specific basis during
the proceedings to classify waters as ORW. At a minimum,
new develo ment will comply with the low density options
as specified in the Stormwater Runoff Disposal rules (15
water line of the designated ORW area. New non-discharge
permits will be required to meet reduced loading rates and
increased buffer zones, to be determined on a case-by-case
basis. t vrit1es- wi1~l be allowed where
sUnifica AT M!!S?ubmergBg?g 'tic ve 'et'atRorr
,resources occur except for maintenance dredg such as
that required to maintain access to existing channels and
facilities located within the designated areas or
maintenance dredging for activities such as agriculture. A
public hearing is mandatory for any proposed permits to
discharge to waters classified as ORW.
Additional actions to protect resource values will be considered
on a site specific basis during the proceedings to classify
waters as ORW and will be specified in Paragraph (e) of this
Rule. These actions may include anything within the powers of
the commission. The commission will also consider local actions
which have been taken to protect a water body in determining the
appropriate state protection options. Descriptions of boundaries
of waters classified as ORW are included in paragraph (e) of this
rule and in the Schedule of Classifications (15 NCAC 2B .0302
through .0317) as specified for the appropriate river basin and
also De aescrlbea on
ronmental Management.
(e)
(1)-(3) No change.
tained by the Division of
S-11
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT Lat:76058144"W
o r it
FIELD, INVESTIGATION REPORT Long:34 42 07 N
z
1. APPLICANT'S NAME Broad Reach Investments, Inc.
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE Hwy. 24, near Ocean, AIWW, Bogue Sound,
Carteret Count *SEE 1984 AERIAL PHOTOS STRIP #31 FRAME #118
@ M-21.
!Trip)
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: DREDGE FILL X CAMA
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: ? 1989
(A) DATES OF SITE VISIT 7-17-89 Vrn
(B) WAS APPLICANT PRESENT NO AtE:? ALIT
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: APPLICATION RECEIVED July 12, 198 nningBran,h
OFFICE .Morehead City Z
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) LOCAL LAND USE PLAN Carteret County LUP 1985
LAND CLASSIFICATION FROM LUP Transition-Residential/Community/
Conservation
DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS IDENTIFIED IN LUP SEE CAMA REVIEW
(B) AEC(S) INVOLVED: OCEAN HAZARD ESTUARINE SHORELINE X
COASTAL WETLANDS PUBLIC TRUST WATERS X
ESTUARINE WATERS X OTHER ORW NOMINEE
(MARINA)
(C) WATER DEPENDENT: YES X NO
(RESIDENTIAL)
(D) INTENDED USE: PUBLIC PRIVATE X. COMMERCIAL
(E) TYPE OF WASTE WATER TREATMENT: EXISTING NONE
PLANNED Tertiary Treatment Plant
(F) TYPE OF STRUCTURES: EXISTING NONE- farm fields
PLANNED Subdivision with highground marina basin
(G) ESTIMATED ANNUAL RATE OF EROSION -0- SOURCE marshgrass
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION:
AREA
(A) VEGETATED WETLANDS DREDGED FILLED OTHER
NONE
(B) NON-VEGETATED WETLANDS:
OPEN WATER: sq. (FOOTPRINT)
Access Channel - 350x60 21,000 ft:
Pier 'A' - 200x6 + (40x12) 1680 sq.ft
Pier 'B' - 300x6 + (40x12) 2280 sq.ft
(C) OTHER:
HIGHGROUNDc
Access Channel 750x60 45,000 sg.ft.
Boat Basin - 540x320 172,800 sq.ft.
Subdivision - 156 ac. 156 ac.
Drystack 350x140 49,000 sq.ft.
(D) TOTAL AREA DISTURBED: Approximately-'80 ac. total
f l...S M tiler. _. e
{
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORt -.BROAD REACH INVESTMENTS, INC.
CARTERET COUNTY
PAGE #2
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: Proposed subdivision - Phase I - 156 ac.
of 271 ac.; 174 single-fadtily lots and 173 attached units
with associated roads and.parking; 75 slip highground marina
basin; 195 slip drystack; community center; with access
piers 200' and 300'.
z,
9. -NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION:
BACKGROUND REVIEW:` On June 29,1988, the Division of
Coastal Management issued Permit #120-88 to Broad Reach
Investments, Inc. authorizing.the development of a 156 ac.
subdivision and marina`basin,oriented along Channel
Alignment 'B' off Sanders Bay, in Carteret County. Since
that time, careful consideration has been given (by the
permittee and the review agencies) to possible project
modifications that would minimize the direct and indirect
environmental consequences caused.by excavation of the
offshore channel and operation of the marina. The
developers have submitted a modification request to the
existing permit that will relocate the access channel and
marina basin along the alignment of Alternative 'A' nearest
the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway.' The applicant's
consultant, Paton/Zucchino & Associates, P.A., have put
together a concise project summary and up-to-date project
description in a three page introduction that is attached to
the application.
PROJECT SETTING: The project site consists of 271.8 ac.
situated between Bogue Sound and Highway 24, near the
community of ocean, in Carteret County, NC. The focus of
the permit request is Phase I consisting of 156 acres
nearest Bogue Sound, Sanders Bay, and Sykes Creek. The
estuarine shoreline of Broad Reach adjoins the Outstanding
Resource Waters (ORW) of Western Bogue Sound. The nominated
area extends 575' onto the highground property.
The master workplat plan, Sheet l of? 7, provides an
overview and orientation to the project. Three of the six
parcels shown on the master plan.are-the subject of Phase I.
Parcel 'A' contains 78.6 acres with-a projected 174
single-family lots (2.21 units/acre) ranging in size from
8,000 sq. ft. along Bogue Sound and,the marina to 12,000 sq.
ft. in the northwest interior. Parcel 'B', at a combined
52.9 acres, is subdivided into Parcels 'B1' and 'B2'
characterized by attached townhouse`u'nits. On the east side
of the property, Parcel 'B1' at 37.,;8 acres will provide 113
residential'units.(299 units/acre)A; A centralized
non-tidal lagoon and amenities area`"i4ill be the focal point
of Parcel 'B11. The developers have`dedicated 1.5 acres of
e
4
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT - BROAD REACH INVESTMENTS, INC.
CARTERET' COUNTY
.PAGE #3
- y
open-ground property within the amenities area of B-1 as a
long-term spoil disposal site reserved for future
maintenance dredging requirements. On the west side of the
property, near the marina basin, Parcel 'B2' with 15.1 acres
will provide 58 attached townhouse units (3.84 units/acre).
Parcel 'C' is 24.5 acres and contains the central activities
center for the entire development. The community center
will contain such activities as a'30 room inn, restaurant,
ships store and club.
All interior side roads in Phase I.will feed to the primary
loop road that encircles the community center. Adjacent to
the loop road is the 75 slip marina basin and drystack
storage facility to be located on 5.1 acres within Parcel
'C'. This figure includes the 60' wide access channel
connecting the highground basin with Bogue Sound some 630'
to the south. As proposed, an entrance channel measuring
350' long x 60' wide x -9.5' deep will be dredged from the
Intracoastal Waterway to the highground access channel
leading to the basin. Dredging and excavation associated
with the entrance channel and access channel will not
involve coastal wetlands or submerged aquatic vegetation
habitat (as determined by NMFS). The marina basin will
measure 540' wide x 320' long x -6.51 deep on MLW. The 4
acre marina basin will be positioned some 685' from the 'SA'
surface waters of Bogue Sound. The developers have
indicated on Page 4 of the application that the proposed
marina is residential rather than commercial or public. The
marina will not provide fuel pumps or repair facilities.
According to the Division of Health Services definition, the
marina design is a closed system marina by virtue of the
lengthy highground canal that connects the boat basin with
Bogue Sound. According to the graduated schedule used by
the Division of Health Services, the proposed marina basin
with 75 wetslips will require a shellfish closure zone of at
least 325' beginning at the basin and., extending down the
highground access channel.
The applicant is proposing to constrtict 2 piers to provide
pedestrian access to Bogue Sound. A`".200' x 6' pier will be
positioned on Bogue Sound just west-of the entrance channel.
Natural water depths at the end of the. 200' pier are
estimated to be -4.5' MLW. A 300'..-Vieir will be located on
the Sanders Bay side of the property `_.The unaltered water
depths at the end of the 300' pier are 'estimated at -2' MLW.
Both piers will be interlinked with the residential
development by wag of wooden boardwalks and concrete
sidewalks. These structures will skirt.the highground
.v 4

t,
t
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT - BROAD REACH INVESTMENTS, INC.
CARTERET. COUNTY
PAGE #4
property and cross only'int;ermittent areas of 1404' and
coastal wetlands.
Broad Reach will be serviced-by a tertiary wastewater
package treatment plant with-infiltrated subsurface lines to
be located on Parcel 'F', a 20.5 acre site near Highway 24.
In addition, the development has been designed with a
community well system as its initial source of drinking
water. These community type-services are consistent with
the current land classification scheme as designated by
Carteret County in their recent Land Use Plan Amendment.
The highgroun'd property within.57.5' of Bogue Sound is
classified 'Community' and the'.remainder of the property is
designated as 'Trans ition/Re`sidential'. At present, the
Broad Reach property is zoned by Carteret County as
'Recreational- Residential/Planned Unit Development'
(RR-PUD). As the master plan shows, a 6 acre out-parcel on
Highway 24 is zoned B-1.
PROJECT DIMENSIONS: The applicant has provided a series of
project statistics that relate to unit density and the
amount of impervious surface areas. This data is
categorized on Workplat Sheet 3 of 7 as well as in the
stormwater plan submitted to DEM and included in the LAMA
application. The applicant's calculations appear to comply
with current requirements of the 575.' Outstanding Resource
Waters area nominated as western Bogue Sound. The overall
unit density for Phase I has been calculated by the
applicant to be 2.21 units per acre.,
EXCAVATION & DREDGING
Entrance Channel: ,;'
350' long x 60' wide x average -9.5' deep (Max. -101)
estimated 21,000 sq. ft.
estimated 3,694 cu. yds.
(no submerged aquatic vegetation, no marshgrass)
(hydraulic dredge)
Highground Access Channel:
750' long x 60' wide x average -8.0' deep (Max. -91)
estimated 45,000 sq. ft..
estimated 10,000 cu. yds. overburden
13,333 cu. yds. below.MLW
Subtotal: 23,333 cu. yds -."`•
(mechanical excavation in-the:=dry)

r r
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT - BROAD REACH INVESTMENTS, INC.
CARTERE`P COUNTY
PAGE #5
Marina Basin:
320' long x 540' wide x average -6.5' deep
(Max.-7.5')
estimated 3.96 ac.
estimated 70,400 cu. yds. overburden
41,600 cu. yds. below MLW
Subtotal: 112,000 cu. yds.
(mechanical excavation in-the-dry)
(no marsh or wetlands involved)
Spoil Disposal Site Highground:
300' long x 240' wide x +7' high
estimated 18,667 cu. yds. volume
Marina: 75 wetslips
2 pumpout slips
2 piers (each) 2451x6'
T-head platform 701x6'
12 finger piers - 28 slips
- 28 tie-off pilings
Set of 14 slips - 7 finger piers
- 13 tie-off pilings
Set of 5 slips - 2 finger piers
- 5 tie-off pilings
Pumpout slip - 1 finger pier
- 3 tie-off pilings
Boat Ramp:
10' wide x 20' long
Drystack:
195 slips
49,000 sq. ft.
65 space parking lot
Bulkheads
Basin 1,535 ln. ft.
Access Channel - 1,570 ln. ft.
Total 3,110 ln. ft.
Boardwalks:
Wooden/Concrete - 22,220 sq. ft.
Community Center:
32,000 sq. ft.
Ship's store
Clubhouse
30 room inn
restaurant

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT - BROAD REACH INVESTMENTS, INC.
CARTERET COUNTY
PAGE #6
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS: The applicant has requested a permit
modification to move the location of the permitted boat
basin and entrance channel from Alignment 'B' on Sanders
Creek to the alternative Alignment 'A' on the Intracoastal
Waterway. Dredging Alternative 'A' involves no coastal
wetlands or submerged aquatic vegetation. The National
Marine Fisheries Service has also classified Alignment 'B'
as 'SAV' habitat. Open water dredging of Alternative 'A'
will generate a footprint of 21,000 sq. ft. based on a
length of 350' by a maximum top width of 601. This
represents a 68% reduction in the total amount of bottom
disturbance when compared to the permitted channel Alignment
'B' at 1100' in length. Water depths within the proposed
entrance channel will average -9.5' relative to MLW. This
is 3.5' deeper than the permitted entrance channel at -6'
MLW. However, the controlling depth at Alignment 'A' is the
existing entrance channel of Holiday Village with a water
depth of -6' MLW. The connecting waters of the Intracoastal
Waterway adjacent to Alternative 'A' are -14' MLW. As the
application states, water depths within the highground
access channel will average -8' as opposed to -5' in the
permitted highground access channel. Within the marina
basin, the applicant proposes a water depth that will
average -6.5' which is approximately 1.5' deeper than the
permitted basin. In terms of channel width, the two
Alignments 'A' and 'B' are comparable in size. Alternative
'A' is proposed with a top width not to exceed 601. The
permitted bottom width of Alignment 'B' is limited or
conditioned (Number 6) to 401. The application indicates
that both power and sailboats with a typical length of under
45' are expected.
Sampling by DMF has shown that hard clam resources occur and
are harvested within the alignments of both the permitted
channel and the one being proposed. An interpretation of
the quantitative aspects of these data is available from
DMF. The significance of the modification request is that
the direct impact on clam habitat will be reduced from
66,000 sq. ft. to 21,000 sq. ft.
The applicant has fine tuned the type and amount of
development that will occur on the highground property. The
amount of impervious surfaces, as presented by the
applicant, complies with CAMA/ORW requirements of less than
30%, and less than 25%, respectively.
w
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT - BROAD REACH INVESTMENTS, INC.
CARTERET COUNTY
PAGE #7
Hydraulic dredging of the open water entrance channel will
generate an estimated 4,000 cu. yds. of sandy spoil. It
will be pumped to a diked area on highground. The disposal
site is about 1.5 acres in size with a design capacity of
18,667 cu. yds. Excavation of the highground basin and
access channel should produce little to no turbidity
problems since the work is scheduled to be accomplished
in-the-dry and landward of an earthen plug near the
shoreline. The hydraulic spoil site may become useful in
de-watering the boat basin during construction. An
estimated 143,000 cu. yds. of sandy loom will be removed
from the 5 acre basin site. The excavated earthen material
will be trucked throughout Phase I and used for landscaping
purposes.
CAMA REVIEW SECTION: The applicant's consultants have
worked closely with the Carteret County Planning Department
to help ensure compliance with all Local Building
Regulations and Zoning ordinances, as well as, the Amended
Land use Plan. The developers are in the process of
requesting a zoning change that will allow construction and
operation of the drystack storage facility within the PUD
designation. Carteret County's review of the zoning changes
and preliminary approval of the subdivision plat is being
coordinated during the CAMA review process.
PREPARED BY: JAMES L. MERCER
DATE: AUGUST 8, 1989
s
MAJOR C.A.M.A. PERMIT APPLICATION
PHASE
JULY 1989
REACH-
CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
1
JUL 1 2 ?
_. r
PATON/ZUCCHINO & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
LAND PLANNING, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
JOHN P. McLEAN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING, SURVEYING

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUMMARY PROJECT DESCRIPTION
CANA APPLICATION
DENSITY LIMITS APPLICATION
DEED RESTRICTIONS AGREEMENT
FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FORM
MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
PARCELS A-C SITE PLAN
PARCELS A-C UTILITY PLAN
PARCELS A-C STORMWATER/EROSION CONTROL PLAN
STORMWATER/EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
CHANNEL PLAN AND PROFILE/MARINA DETAILS

' SUMMARY PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Broad Reach property is located between Highway 24 and
Bogue Sound in the White Oak Township in Carteret County,
' roughly halfway between Swansboro and Morehead City.. The
property encompasses 271.8 acres. The Major C.A.M.A. Permit
Request for Phase one includes the southern 156 acres of the
' total 271.8 acres in the property. The Phase One permit
request is bounded by Bogue Sound to the southeast, Syke's
Creek to the north and a privately owned undeveloped parcel
to the west. Most of the permit request area is currently in
' agricultural use. The remaining areas are wooded uplands and
wetlands.
The property is currently zoned as Recreational Residential -
Planned Unit Development (RR-PUD) by Carteret County with a
six acre outparcel zoned B-3 commercial fronting NC 24. The
' County C.A.M.A. Land Use Plan has designated the property for
two land use categories, the Transitional - Residential and
Community Classification. The area adjoining of Bogue Sound
has the Community Classification and has also been nominated
as Outstanding Resource Waters by NCDEM.
The Broad Reach development has been master planned as a
private retirement and second home water front community
providing private amenities to its residents and their
guests. The project is divided into six parcels, labeled on
the Master Development Plan as Parcels A through F. The 156
acres in the Phase One permit request area includes Parcels
A,B, & C.

Parcel A, at 78.6 acres, contains 174 single family lots
ranging in size from 8,000 -12,000 square feet. It occupies
the northwestern and south central sections of the permit
request area. The larger lots are concentrated in the
northwestern section and the smaller lots near the shoreline
of Bogue Sound and the Marina. All lots in Parcel A are
serviced from cul-de-sacs off the main loop road.

Parcel B is subdivided into Parcels B1, & B2, both containing
attached units. Parcel B1 occupies the extreme eastern 37.8
acres of the permit request area. It contains 113 units
surrounding a central lagoon and small amenity center.
Parcel B2 is in the southwestern corner adjacent to the sound
and marina. It contains 58 units on 15.1 acres situated to
' take advantage of the views to a proposed pond near the shore
and the Community Center complex.
' Parcel C occupies the central 24.5 acres of the permit
request area. It contains the central amenities of Broad
Reach. Within the loop road, the 32,000 square foot
Community Center will hold a 30 room inn, restaurant, ship's
' store, and community club. A pool and four tennis courts are
located adjacent to the club. Outside the loop road and
adjacent to the 75 slip residential marina is a 195 slot non-
commercial drystack for use by the project residents.
The upland marina basin is a private facility and is served
' by an access channel to the Intracoastal Waterway located 350
feet offshore. The channel location was determined by the
State and Federal resource agencies as the alignment with
least impact on aquatic resources. Sewage pump out
' facilities will be available near the drystack facility.
A 200 foot pedestrian pier near the marina channel connects
' to a pedestrian walkway system that rings the shoreline and
marina basin. A second 300 foot pedestrian pier is located
to the east in Parcel B2. The pedestrian system includes
concrete walks in upland areas and wooden boardwalks in
wetlands.
The entire Broad Reach project will be serviced by a central
' utility system. The water system's initial source will be a
community well system. When the West Carteret Water
Corporation extends its lines along NC 24 in the early
' 19901s, service lines will be extended to Broad Reach. The
central sewer system will be a combination of gravity lines
and force mains directed to a tertiary package treatment
' plant in Parcel F, the wastewater treatment area. The
treated wastewater will be infiltrated via subsurface lines
in a manner approved by the Division of Environmental
Management (DEM).
' Impervious surfaces in the permit request area total 36.89
acres or 23.6% of the entire area in Phase One. The
' impervious surface area is below the maximum 25% coverage
requirements of the DEM low density stormwater control
regulations. In addition to the low density design,
stormwater infiltration basins have been designed using DEM
guidelines for Parcel C as an added measure of water quality
planning for this Parcel.
' Erosion control will be accomplished by the standard methods
of silt fencing, sediment pits, and vegetative stabilization
developed by the Land Quality Section of the N.C. Division of
' Land Resources. The erosion control plan insures that Broad
Reach will not contribute any construction sediment to the
surrounding waterbodies.
' Broad Reach has been planned to benefit from the inherent
natural strengths and beauty of the site and takes the
relevant local State and Federal regulations into account.
' Through thoughtful analysis and programming a development has
emerged that will attract responsible residents without
marring the natural beauty and sensitive ecology of this
' stretch of Bogue Sound.
fl

L

d. Describe the planned use of the project.
Private Residential Pro ect for use
o an aners and guests
a. Size of entire tract 271.8 acres
b. Size of individual lot(s) varies
c. Elevation of tract above mean sea level or Na-
tional Geodetic Vertical Datum 0-16' NSL
d. Soil, ty (s) fnd' texture(s) of tract WandO, Seabrook
conetoe, ai y oams, Leon sand & a e qt&
e. Vegetation on tract mt:
farmfields and woods
f. Man-made feitures now on tract None
a. Street address or secondary road number
Higlway 24
b. City, town community, or landmark
Ocean,
c. County. Carteret
' d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? County Jurisdiction
e. Name of body of water nearest project
' Bog1p Samd
a. Describe all development activities you propose
(for example, building a home, motel, marina,
-bulkhead or pier).
75 1 Marina -200; &` 360 trian piers
195 : a Center 7 -='
lots h 1/3 t is Associated parking
& roa
If you'plan to build a marina, also complete
and attach Form DCM-MP-2.
b. h- the proposed activity maintenance of an ex-
iitir?g project, new -work or both?
Flew Work
c. Will the project. be;. for !community, private, or
commercial use?
----Private, Ccxnmiriity,. -
0
Please type or print. Carefully describe all an-
ticipated development activities, including construc-
tion, excavation, filling, paving, land clearing, and
stormwater control. If the requested information is
not relevant to your project, write N/A (not ap-
plicable). Items 14 and 8.9 must be completed for
all projects.

a. Name Broad Reach Investments, Inc.
Address 133 Fayetteville Street
City Raleigh State NC
Zip 27602 JDayphone [phone]
X Landowner or Authorized agent
b. Project name (if any) Broad Reach
g. What is the CAMA. Land Use Plan Classifica-
tion of the site? (Consult the local land use
plan.) _
Conservation X Transitional
Developed X Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by ?local government?
RR-PLID
i. How are adjacent waters classified? SA
j. Has a professional-archaeological survey been
carried out for the tract? Yes
If so, by whom? Carolina Archaeolo??ical
services Coluribia..'SC
upland development yz
a....:.Type and number of buildings, facilities, or ,
structures proposed 32 , 000 S . F. Comrnmity Center
49,000 Drystack facility. 173 Attached
Units.
b. Number of lots or parcels 74 S.F. Lots
c. Density (Give the number of residential units.
and the units per acre.) 2.2 U/A
d. Size of area to be graded or disturbed f 0 acres
e. If the proposed project will disturb more than
one acre of land, the Division of Land
Resources must receive an erosion and sedimen-
tation control plan at least 30 days before land
disturbing activity begins. If applicable, has a
sedimentation and erosion control plan been
submitted to the Division of Land Resources?
Yes
f. Gi4i..?d# percentage of the tract widiii '75 ;at
hiji water ;to le covered by am-
le surface!; iW s.pavemet 1
or rooftops. - `12.31

c. If the applicant is not the landowner, also give
1 A
In addition to the completed application form, the
' following items must be submitted:
A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims
title to the affected property. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then for-
ward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
' which the owner claims title, plus written permis-
sion from the owner to carry out the project.
An accurate work plat (including plan view and
' cross sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on 8 V2 x 11 white paper. (Refer to Coastal
Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a detailed
description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
' only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if 16
high quality copies are provided by the applicant.
(Contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regard-
ing that agency's use of larger drawings.) A site or
location map is a part of plat requirements and it
must be sufficiently detailed to guide agency per-
sonnel unfamiliar with the area to the site. Include
county road (SR) numbers, landmarks, and the like.
' A stormwater management plan, if applicable, that
may have been developed in consultation with the
Division of Environmental Management.
A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners. These
individuals have 30 days in which to submit com-
ments on the proposed project to the Division of
Coastal Management. The applicant must advise
the adjacent landowners of this opportunity by sen-
ding a copy of the permit application to them by
registered or certified mail. This notification is re-
quired by G.S. 113-229(d).
Name Charles Shilstone
Address J.A. Bell Lane
Newport, NC 28570
Name W.B. Fowler & T.M. Singleton
' Address 5214 Bogue Sound Drive
Emerald Isle, NC 28557
Name
' Address

A list of previous state or federal permits issued
for work on the project tract. Include permit
nCAMA?13 rn it 1120 88issuing d aReach Investments
Control Permit Broad Reach Investments
9
A check for $100 made payable to the Depart-
ment of Natural Resources and Community
Development to cover the costs of processing the
application.
A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in ocean-
front and inlet areas.
A statement on the use of public funds. If the
project involves the expenditure of public funds, at-
tach a statement documenting compliance with the
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act
(N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to 10).
Any permit 'issued in response to this application
will allow only the development described in the
application. The project will be subject to condi-
tions and restrictions contained. in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the pro-
posed activity complies with the State of North
Carolina's approved Coastal Management Program
and will be conducted in a manner consistent with
such program.
I further certify that I am authorized to grant, and
do in fact, grant permission to representatives of
state and federal review agencies to enter on the
aforementioned lands in connection with
evaluating information related to this permit ap-
plication and follow-up monitoring of project.
Thi is the g day of ,
19.
X
Landowner or Author' a age)
Send the completed a plication materials to the
Division of Coastal Management Office nearest you
and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. See the
map on the inside front cover for the appropriate
DCM office and addresses and phone number.
3
Form DCM-MP-1
IMARINA
(DEVELOPMENT
' Attach this form to the Application for Permits to
Develop in North Carolina's Coastal Area. Be sure
to complete all other sections of that application
which relate to this proposed project, including
upland areas, even if duplicative. All shore-based
facilities must be included in application and work
' plats.
' a. Check below the type of marina proposed.
Commercial Public
X Residential
' b. Will the marina be open to the general publi 7
No. Fer p=Ject owners & guests onfy
c. If there is residential development associated
' with the marina, how man units or lots are
planned? 174 lots 173 Attached Units
d. Check all of the types of service to be
provided.
Full service, including travel
X lift and/or rail
^-Dockage, fuel, and marine supplies
'- Dockage ("wet slip only
X Number of slips
-Dry storage
' Number of boats 195
X Boat ramp(s)
Other (describe)
e. Check below the proposed type of siting.
X Land cut and access channel
' Open water with dredging for basin
and/or channel
Open water, no dredging required
Other (describe)
' f. Describe the typical boats to be served (for ex-
ample, open runabout, charter boats, sail boats,
or mixed types). Per Sail Boats ?Under ' g. Typical boat length 5
h. Maximum boat length =501-?`
i. fre any floating N?Adings planned? No

a. Check each of the following sanitary facilities
which will be included in the proposed project.
X Office toilets
X Toilets for patrons
Number 4
Location Drystack and Ship's Store
Showers -
X Boat holding tank p.. umpout
Type and location Pup out facilities
at non berthing vier near Drys tack
b. Describe treatment type and location for all
sanitary wastewater. TertiaxV Treatment Plant
with subsurface disposal o treated water
c. Describe solid waste, offal, and wsh
disposal. Solid waste comas provided at
each pier -and at ramp. lWte and.
removed to County
d. How will overboard discharge of from -aw boats be controlled? -Combined efart at sigpage,
staff enforcement closed Po icy
and pumpout availability
e. Give the location and number f t, Sewage.
asscharge" s? pro.
eeaacchh pier en at ram_nea[ stack
entrance,At Ship's tore
f. Describe.the special design, if applicable, for
containing industrial type pollutants, such as
paint, sandblasting waste, and petrohm ro-.
ducts. No fuel pumps or Kff2H facilities
No special ign cantro s
g. Where will residue be disposed of?
disposal site

$o, descnbe_ h. Give the number of channeLmarkets and "No
Wake" signs proposed.
Note: Regulatory signs such as then
nquire ad.
dt?io?n??a/l??approval by N.C.' 'Wddbk
Ri
}¦??
_f
. .
1 ,

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENr
' Submittal Form for Projects Using Density Limits for Stormwater Control
PROJECT DATA
Name of Project: Broad Reach
Location (Countyy,
O Township/Municipality., Address): Carteret Comity
cean, NC 24
' Applicant Name: atop ucc Associates, P. A.
Mailing Address: _ 17 Glmwood verriue
'
Phone No: Raleigh,M
[phone]
Submittal Date. 715/89
' Brief Description (include map and appropriate drawings):
174 Single Family Lots, 171 Attached Units, & Associated amenity complex
Water Body Receiving Stormwater Runoff:
Name of Water Body: Sound
Classification of Water Body:
' Total Area of Proposed Project (acres): 156.0 Acres
State/Federal Permits and Approvals Required:
(Check Appropriate Blanks)
CAMA Major X Sedimentation and Erosion Control x
' 404 Permit X- DEM/DHS Sewage Disposal X
Other (specify):
CALCULATION OF BUILT-UPON AREA
(Built-upon area means that portion of an individual development that is
' covered by impervious or partially pervious cover including buildings,
pavement, recreation facilities, etc. but not including decking.)
' a) Built-upon area. 36.89 acres
b) Total project area: X6.0 acres
% built-upon - built-upon area /total project area * 100
' % built-upon area - 23.6 %
If the water body receiving stormwater runoff is classified as SA, is the
' % built-upon area < 25% ? Yes X No
If the water body receiving stormwater runoff is classified other than SA,
' is the % built-upon area < 30 % ? Yes No
STORMWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM
' Is the only kind of stormwater collection system grass swales?
Yes No X
(Grassed-lined swales should have a side slope of 3:1 (H:V) or less.)

1 If no, please provide a detailed description.
S
manna area. F.Lease re ter to p ans or tai a description.
BUFFER AREA
' Is the built-upon area at least 30 feet from mean high water of all
surface waters? Yes No x
If no, please provide a detailed description.
' One boat ramp, the Drystack service drive and a series of
woden walkways are closer to t marina buMga?
(Note: Only boat ramps, public roads, public bridges and walkways to water
' related facilities are allowed within 30 feet of mean high water if the
project is intended to meet stormwater control requirements through
density limits.)
' DEED RESTRICTIONS AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS
Do the deed restrictions and protective covenants ensure that subdivisions
' maintain the development consistent with the plans and specifications
approved by the division and include the State as a beneficiary of the
restrictions?
' Yes X No
(Include a copy of the restrictions and covenants with this form.)
' CERTIFICATION
I. Peter Williamson certify that the information included on
' this submittal form is correct, that the project will be constructed in
conformance with this information and that to the best of my knowledge, the
the best of my knowledge, the propose project complies with the requirement
' of 15 NCAC 2N.1003 (b).
_74_rJ10)1
' Signature- Owner or Agent at
17 Glenwood Avenue, Raleigh, NC 27 0
Address
' If agent, please list owner's nathe'and address below.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SIGN-OFF
' Regional Office
' Date Individual Evaluating Forms / Plans
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
PATON / ZUCCHINO
& ASSOCIHEIS. P. A.

July 3, 1989
' Mr. Mark Hawes
N.C. Division of Environmental Management
7225 Wrightsville Avenue
' Wilmington, N.C. 28403
RE: Broad Reach: Major CAMA Permit Phase One
Stormwater/Density Limits
' Dear Mr. Hawes:
' As agent of the owner of the above mentioned property in
Carteret County, I am submitting this agreement to restrict
the maximum impervious built upon surface in the entire Phase
' One area of the Broad Reach Project. Computations
determining the maximum allowable built upon area for each
lot and detailed amounts of impervious area for each parcel
are specified in the attached chart titled "Impervious
' Surface Summary Broad Reach Major CAMA Permit Phase One. A
summary of these figures are included in the attached form
titled "Submittal Form For Projects Using Density Limits For
' Stormwater Control".
Each single family lot in the subdivision will be restricted
to a maximum impervious cover of 3,350 s.f. through a set of
legal deed restrictions attached to each lot. By restricting
each owner to a certain built upon surface area, the total
development will not exceed the twenty-five percent
' limitation on impervious surfaces. The restrictions and
covenants specifically note that the State of North Carolina
will be the beneficiary of these restrictions.

Land Planning
' Landscape Architecture
C
S
ooper
quare
17 Glenwood Ave.
' Raleigh,N.C. 27603
919-834-8620
FAX-919-828-7068

' Please contact me if you require any additional information
or clarification concerning these matters. We would greatly
appreciate your immediate attention to this request so that
the development construction can move forward as soon as
possible.
' Sincerely,
1
J
Peter Williamson
Attachments
NORTH CAROLINA
' WAKE COUNTY
r c,
I, Notary Public
in and for the above
County and State do hereby certify that Peter Williamson
' personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the
execution of the foregoing instrument.

Witness my hand and notarial seal this 1
of 1989.

Notary Public
My Commission Expires: 2-

7

1 July 3, 1989
' IMPERVIOUS SURFACE SUMMARY
Broad Reach Major CAMA Permit Phase One

0

Parcel A
Asphalt Dives
2,500 L.F. of 12' Drives*
950 L.F. of 24' Drives
5,600 L.F. of 22' Drives
14 Cul-de-sacs @ 5,650 each
Private Lots
174 lots at 3,350 S.F./lot
Total Impervious Surfaces
Total Allowed Impervious Surface
78.6 acres x 25% x 43,560 S.F.
PATON / ZUCCHINO
& ASSO CLUES.I'.A.
255.100 S.F.
30,000 S.F.
•22,800 S.F.
123,200 S.F.
79,100 S.F.
582,900 S.F.
838,000 S.F.
855,954 S.F.
% Impervious Surfaces 24.5%
* Where the loop road surrounding Parcel C abuts Parcel A it
is assumed to contribute 1/2 its impervious surface to
Parcel C and 1/2 to Parcel A.
Parcel B
Asphalt Surfaces
4,100 L.F. of 20' Drives
665' L.F. of 28' Entry Drive
308 Parking Spaces x 160 S.F.
' Clubhouse Area
Clubhouse
Tennis Courts
Pool Deck
Concrete Walks
2,610 L.F. of 4' walk
' 3,920 L.F. of 3' walk

149,900 S.F.
82,000 S.F.
18,620 S.F.
49,280 S.F.
18,600 S.F.
3,000 S.F.
13,200 S.F.
2,400 S.F.
22,200 S.F.
10,440 S.F.
11,760 S.F.
Land Planning
Landscape Architecture
Cooper Sluare
17 Glenwood Ave.
Raleigh,N.C. 27603
919-834-8620
FAX-919-828-7068

' Attached Units 135,600 S.F.
113 Units x 1,200 S.F.
' Total Impervious Surfaces 326,300 S.F.
Total Allowed Impervious Surfaces 411,642 S.F.
37.8 acres x 25% x 43,560 S.F.
% Impervious Surface 19.85
' Parcel B2
Asphalt Surfaces 73,400 S.F.
2,510 L.F. of 20' Drives 50,200 S.F.
' 145 Parking Spaces x 160 S.F. .23,200 S.F.
' Concrete Walks
1,200 L.F. of 4' walk 11,100
4,800 S.F.
S.F.
2,100 L.F. of 3' walk 6,300 S.F.
' Attached Units 69,600 S.F.
58 x 1,200 S.F.
Total Impervious Surface 154,100 S.F.
Total Allowed Impervious Surface 164,439 S.F.
' 15.1 x .25 x 43,560 S.F.
% Impervious Surface 23.4%
' Parcel C
Asphalt Surfaces 150,220 S.F.
650 L.F. of 14' Club Entrance Drive 9,100 S.F.
' 2,500 L.F. of 12' Loop road 30,000 S.F.
1,970 L.F. of 24' parking lot drives 47,280 S.F.
' 1,100 L.F. of 24' Loop road
234 Parking Spaces x 160 S.F. 26,400
37,440 S.F.
S.F.
Community Center 71,400 S.F.
' Building 32,000 S.F.
Pool Deck 9,000 S.F.
800 L.F. Concrete Sidewalks x 5 4,000 S.F.
' 4 Tennis Courts 26,400 S.F.
Dry Stack 53,600 S.F.

' Building
Concrete ramp & fork lift Pad 49,000
4,600 S.F.
S.F.
Total Impervious Surfaces 276,620 S.F.

% Impervious Surfaces 32.6%
D

m'
FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY/OWNERSHIP FOAM
SEDIMENTATION POLLUTION CONTROL ACT
No person may initiate any land-disturbing activity on one or more contiguous acres as covered by the An
before this form and an acceptable erosion and sedimentation control plan have been completed and approved
by the Land Duality Section, N.C. Department of Natural Resources and Community Development. (Please type
' or print and, it question is not applicable, place N/A in the blank.)
Part A.
' 1. Project Name Broad- Reach
2. Location of land-disturbing activity: County Carteret: , City
' or Township Ocean , and Highway / Street NC 24
3. Approximate date land-disturbing activity will be commenced: 6/1/89
' 4. Purpose of development (residential, commercial, industrial, etc.) Residential _
' 5. Approximate acreage of land to be disturbed or uncovered 45 acres
' 6. Has an erosion and sedimentation control plan been tiled ?Yes x No
7. Person to contact should sediment control Issues arise during land-disturbing activity.
Name PPt= WilliamM _ Telephone [phone]
S. Landowner (s) of Record ( Use blank page to list additional owners.):
' rnaA R Ach Irrtrp Mints
Name (s) ,
' P.O. Box 1550
Current Mailing Address Current Street Address
Raleigh, NC 27602
City State Zip City State Zip
15-29-B-116
' 9. Recorded in Deed Book No. 15-20-12, 15-29-C-1 Page No.
Pact B.
1. Person (s) or firms (s) who are financially responsible for this land-disturbing activity (Use the blank page to list
' additional persons or firms):
W. Carlton Midzette_
' Name of Person (s)or Firm (s)
P.O. Box 1550
' Mailing Address Street Address
Rale!FJ2, NC 27602
City State zip city State Zip
' Telephone [phone] Telephone
t
L
w

11

i
i

i

A) K the Financially Responsible Party is a Corporation give name and street address of the Registered
Agent.
Name
City State Zip
Mailing Address
Telephone
Street Address
City
State Zip
Telephone
(b) K the Financially Responsible Party is a Partnership give the name and street address of each General
Partner ( Use blank page to list additional partners.):
Name
Mailing Address
Street Address
City State zip
Telephone
City State Zip
Telephone
The above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and was provided by me
under oath, (This form must be signed by the financially responsible person if an individual or his attomey-in-
fact or K not an individual by an officer, director. partner, or registered agent with authority to execute instru-
ments for the finanaciatly responsible person). I agree to provide corrected Information should there be any
change in the information provided herein.
W. Carlton Midyette
Type or print name
nature
Title or Authority
4/14189
Date
!, - LIAWA, /.. 7W&I po2T , a Notary Public of the County of WAtE
State of North Carolina, hereby certify that GAP4:%Z>n1 M??yF7`
appeared -personally before me this day and being duly sworn acknowledged that the above form was ex? e
Cuted by him.
Witness my hand and notarial seal, this day of 281L
n ?.•``?t? DAB
O
seat ` •• ''
Notary ; `•• NOTARY
My commission expire s?&?9b?:,.;,.,a.._
PUellc
IV.. COUNT,

1
Gt1l -k1;_-1'?0'?
a+
N?
16: it. I_Hu 1 EHt•IK WI LM F•,EU GHF 1 tvt l u HHL L 1 bHHHY P.02
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
MEMORANDUM
Date: October 2, 1989
To: Bill Mills
Planning Br rich
From: Don Safri
James H. Gregson
Wilmington Regional e
Through: Preston Howard
wilmington.Regiona Office
p311123Q
OOT 198g oo.
Rf.. co
P?ann, °4C1T'Y .?
v
3ranch
Subject: Regional Office Review and Recommendations
Application for Permit for Excavation and/or Fill
Project # 8908-A
Broad Reach Investments, Inc.
Carteret County
PROJECT DESCRIPTXON: Proposed is Phase I of the Broad Reach
subdivision, 156 acres of 271 acres, to consist of 174
single-family lots and 173 attached units; 75 slip highground
marina basin with a 3501 X 60' entrance channel and a 750' X 60'
highground access channel; 195 slip drystack; community center;
and two access piers 200' and 3001.
ADJACENT WATER BODY: Bogue Sound
CLASSIFICATION: SA
STATUS: OPEN
The project has been reviewed to determine impacts to water
quality. The following comments have been provided.
1. The project will require a 401 Water Quality Certification.
2. The project complies with the General 401 water Quality
Certification No. 1273 for the discharge of liquid effluent
from a diked disposal area resulting from hydraulic
dredging, and Certification No. 1431 for boat ramp
construction.
3. An earthen plug shall be maintained in the channel during
excavation of the basin and the majority of the channel.
4. The proposed project should be done in such a way as to not
cause the turbidity outside the immediate construction area
to exceed 25 NTU.
OOT-O2-1'-WO 16: 16
8908-A.SEP
Page Two
FROM EHHR l.J I LM REG OFF I CE TO RHL L I BRRR`r' P.03
5. A stormwater management plan has been approved for this
project.
6. A4? this time no information has been received by this office
concerning wastewater disposal. The proposed tertiary
package treatment plant with subsurface disposal would
require a either a State Non-discharge Permit issued by DEM
or a permit issued by the local health department or DHS.
The project was issued CAMA Permit No. 120-88 on June 29,
1988 for the the subdivision development and marina basin with
entrance channel along Alignment 'B' off Saunders Bay. With the
current application the channel would be constructed along the
alignment of Alternative 'A' off the A:CWW. The new proposal
would reduce the direct impact on clam habitat from 66,000 sq.
ft. to 21,000 sq. ft. This office has no objection to this
modification request unless: 1) DHS determines that an automatic
closure of productive shellfish areas would be required; or 2)
DMF determines that the dredging of the entrance channel would
remove a significant shellfish resource. If either of these
occur this office would recommend denial of the project.
JHG:8908-A.SEP
cc: DCM - James L. Mercer
tt", CF
Sr 3,0 too rZ0
9Jzs/fit
1TORTH CAROLINA COASTAL FEDERATION
ladnot Creek Farm • 3223-4 Highway 58 • Swaneboro, North Carolina 28584 • ??3??1 jS
September 16,1989
George Everett
NC Division of Coastal Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
a ?!9{
J ? ? v
Dear George:
Please consider these comments in regard to Broad Reach's latest
application to modify its permit. Our comments regarding this
application include:
(1) Include by reference alb our previous,comments made in regard
to this project which are in earlier permit files;
(2) Include by reference all previous public and agency comments
in regard to this project which are in earlier permit files;
(3) Project proposal violates new ORW regulations just adopted for
western Bogue Sound. Rule 15 NCAC 2B .0216(c)(2) now states
that "No dredge or fill activities will be allowed where
significant shellfish or submerged aquatic vegetation bed
resources occur except for maintenance dredging..." This
rule should preclude any expansion of the permitted marina
facility. The proposed channel alignment has been documented
to have a signficant shellfish resource by the NC Division of
Marine Fisheries. While the new ORW regulations do not take
effect until January 1, you know from your experience at DEM
that the state is required to protect existing uses (such as
the ORW resource values) regardless of when the new rules take
effect. Thus, loss of this resource to dredging would be a
violation of state water quality standards which.you are required
by CAMA regulations to enforce.
(4) The road leading to the waterfront development is currently a
small.farm road that passes through 404 wetlands. No provisions
in this application have been made to deal with filling activities
that will be required to construct a road to this project.
It.is clear that this new proposal violates the dredging limitations
just adopted by the EMC. Please refer to Jim Kennedy',s letter of,
January 21, 1989 in regard to additional problems posed by this
project. We ask you do deny this permit modification request.
Please notify us immediately of any actions taken in regard to this
project.

Aige Two
Comments on Broad Reach
September 16, 1989
Thank you for considering these comments.
Sincerely,
Todd Miller
Executive Director
cc: Paul Wilms
Bill Hogarth
Bill Mills
Corps of Engineers
discharges will be permitted, and stormwater controls for
all new development activities requiring a
Sediment/Erosion Control Plan will be required as follows:
(A) Low density Option: Developments which limit single
family developments to one acre lots and other type
developments to 12% built-upon area,. have no stormwater
collection system as defined in 15 NCAC 2H .1002(13),
and have built-upon areas at least 30 feet from surface
water areas will be deemed to comply with this
requirement.
(B) High Density Development: Higher density developments
will be allowed if stormwater control systems utilizing
wet detention ponds as described in 15 NCAC 2H
.1003(i), (k) and (1) are installed, operated and
maintained which control the runoff from all built-upon
areas generated from one inch of rainfall. The size of
the control system must take into account the runoff
from any pervious surfaces draining to the system.
More stringent requirements may be required by the Environmental
Management Commission on a site specific basis.
(2) Saltwater: Water quality conditigns shall clearly maintain
and protect the outstanding resource values of waters
classified ORW. Management strategies.topro tect resource
specitied in to
AC 2H .1003(a)(2
ter line of the
rmits will be re
creased buffer z
basis.
acilities
witni.n 5 r.5 t
signated ORW
ired to meet.
es, to be det
11_ Activ
ntain access
ithin the des
for activiti
nsity options
eet of the mean high
area. New non-discharge
reduced loading rates and
ermined on a case-by-case
d
firNsuch as
to existing channels and
ignated areas or
es such as agriculture. A
public hearing is mandatory for any proposed permits to
discharge to waters classified as ORW.
Additional actions to protect resource values will be considered
on a site specific basis during the proceedings to classify
waters as ORW and will be specified in Paragraph (e) of this
Rule. These actions may include anything within the powers of
the commission. The commission will also consider local actions
which have been taken to protect a water body in determining the
appropriate state protection options. Descriptions of boundaries
of waters classified as ORW are included in paragraph (e) of this
rule and in the Schedule of Classifications (15 NCAC 2B .0302
through . 0317 ) as spe^, fied for the ="-nrnrnri nf-c ri c,cr lh=ci n =r A
will also be describe
Environmental Manaaen
(e)
(1)-(3) No change.
on maps mainta
of
S-11

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Water Quality Section
January 6, 1989
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: ;oh Parker
FROM: Ill Mills/
SUBJECT: Application for CAMA Permit
Broad Reach Investments - Major Modification
Carteret County
The Subject application has been reviewed for water
quality impacts and the following comments are offered:
a. The proposed project will not require a 401 Water
Quality Certification.
b. The applicant has been contacted regarding
stormwater runoff management and is submitting a
revised stormwater plan.
BM/dbp
cc: Preston Howard
-qo -
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE : //3/ff
TO: Bill Mills
Operations Branch
FROM: James H. Gregsonswo'
Wilmington Regional Office
THROUGH: Donald Safrit
Wilmington Regional Office
RE EIVED
JAN - 5 ? ,t?9
WATER QUALITY SECTION
OPERATIONS BRANCH
SUBJECT: Regional Office Review & Recommendations
Application for Permit for Excavation and/or Fill
4W P( /Q.t*a ??1aii 0 . *4%e-.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
w?ii1?+ ? n ? a0
ADJACENT WATER BODY: ##Wz"
641-
CLASSIFICATION: j AC
Status: 0.404rA/
The project has been reviewed to determine impacts to water
quality. The appropriate comments below have been checked:
(?C) The project will/ ill not quire a 401 Water Quality
Certification.
( ) The project complies with the General 401 Water Quality
Certification # for
(?) The proposed project should be done in such a way as to
not cause the turbidity outside the immediate
construction area to exceed .26' NTU.
(x ) ? R?,Cccatif ? ?? Grw'?ac-c?P G?c?+? 5 f9za?+,???""'?.
This office has no objection to the project as proposed.
JHG:mb
cC : DCM --.f k*%eS L- MMA&BIL
CF, WiRO

R f .y

'f,
%
?,y„ i y 4r?Y+a ??1

y?4
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Coastal Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27
James G. Martin, Governor David W. Owens
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary December 28, 1988 DEC 3 () 1983 Director
Wilmington IleAmional Office
Mr. R. Paul Wilms, Director MAJOR MODIFICATION
Division of Environmental Management PERMIT #120-88
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Dear Mr. Wilms:
The attached copy of an application submitted by:
BROAD REACH INVESTMENTS, INC.
Applicant's Name
HWY. 24, BOGUE SOUND CARTERET
Location of Project County
for a State permit to perform excavation and/or fill
work in coastal North Carolina and for a CAMA major
development permit...
X for a CAMA major development permit (only) ...
... is being circulated to State and Federal agencies having jurisdiction
over the subject matter which might be affected by the project.
Please indicate on the reverse side of this form your viewpoint on
the proposed work and return it to me not later than ,I?t3ar??,,198•
Sincerely,
h R. Parker, Jr., Chief
Major Permits Processing Section
JRP:ap:2480
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

(A) This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
(B) This agency has no comment on the project as proposed.
(C) This agency approves of the project (or project concept) and/or recommends
these minor refinements for project management.
(D)
This agency objects to the.project and recommends permit denial based on a
finding of:
(1) adverse impacts under G.S. 113-229(e) 1-5 (the dredge and fill law)as
enumerated below:
(e) (1) ... that there will be significant (e) (2) ... that there will be signifi-
adverse effect of the proposed dred-cant advemp effect on the vali
ging > >ng on the use and enjoynent of the property of
of the water by the public; any riparian owners;
(e)(3) ... that there will be significant (e)(4) ... that there will be signifi-
adverse effect on public health, cant adverse effect on the con-
safety, and welfare; servation of public and private
water supplies;
(e)(5) that there will be significant
adverse effect on wildlife or
fresh water, estuarine or marine
fisheries;
(1) Inconsistency with Rules of the Coastal Resources Commission
as enumerated in 15 NCAC 7H (or other). Please site
rule.
(3) Inconsistency with the local Land Use Plan (Please elaborate).
(4) Inconsistency with Rules, Guidelines or Standards of
this agency or a finding that the project is in conflict
with other authority or interest as stipulated below.
(E) Attachment. Include memorandum or other documentation that support
findings relating to D1-4 or provide general comments.
Signature
ate
ja,oldw3 uoQW maeuuW ,y!ututoddo 1enlr3 uy
£6LZ-5£L-616 au04dalay L891--119LL Bull-ED WON '4ftl9 1 'L89LL X09 Od
08'IZ : de : dgr
u0113as 8ulssaooaa sIimaad aoCRN
jam `'ar 'aaXaed *a
'Alaaaauig
• uegl aalel jou am of IT uanlaa pug xaoM pasodoad aqj
uo JuiodMaTA anOft W OJ sigj Jo apis asaanaa aqj uo a1e31pui aseald .
•43aCoad aqj dq paloa;Ie aq Ig8im gaigM aal4em laaCgns aql nano
uoT43TpszanC 8utneg salaua8e Igaapad pus ale4g 01 palgTnaaia 8uiaq st •••
•• (,&Iuo) jimaad juamdolaeap aoCem VRVD a ao; -)T--
•••Iimaad juamdolanap
aofem VNV0 a 10I pug BUTTOJVD gIJON TeIseOa UT 410M
11i3 ao/pue UOTIVAeaxa maoJaad 04 ITmaad ajejg a ao;
Aquno0 43afoaa so uoTleaol
laualuvo, aHnos Hnoos n •mH
amex s,jueaTjddy
'0141 ' SlNaWSSaANI HOM CIVOIdH
:,&q pailTmgns uoiieaTjdde ue ;o Moo pagaeIIe.agj,
: smTTM • aN agaQ
88-0ZT# SIW2iad
NOISKOI3IQoW 2iofvw
119LZ guiToaeO ggaoH 'q$ialeg
quama?euew 1e-4uamuoaznug ;o uoisiniQ
aolaaaia 'smITM Ines •g -IN
.ioaaaald 886T '8Z .19quM 0 as AmwDaS 'sapogS sewoU -S
suaMp A plned .iouaanOO 'uq teW '0 saws(
119LZ euiloleD WON '48!aleg o S A ingsileS yuoN T-19
;uawoOeueW leaseoD jo uasin.U
4uauldoianaQ A4iunwwoD pup saoanosa-d lu" 4EN 3o 4uau..UedaQ
RuiloleD VON 3o a4'nS
wlwmo
a ?yy' so
Or i
(A) This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
(B) This agency has no comment on the project as proposed.
(C) This agency approves of the project (or project concept) and/or recommends
these minor refinements for project management.
(D) This agency objects to the project and recommends permit denial based on a
finding of:
(1) adverse impacts under G.S. 113-229(e) 1-5 (the dredge and fill law)as
enumerated below:
(e)(1) ... that there will be significant (e) (2) ..: that there will be signifi-
adverse effect of the proposed dred- cant adverse effect on the value
ging and filling on the use and enjoynent of the property of
of the water by the public; any riparian owners;
(e)(3) ... that there will be significant (e)(4) ... that there will be signifi-
adverse effect on public health, cant adverse effect on the con-
safety, and welfare; servation of public and private
water supplies;
(e)(5) that there will be significant
adverse effect on wildlife or
fresh wa`ier, estuarine or marine
fisheries;
(1) Inconsistency with Rules of the Coastal Resources Commission
as enumerated in 15 NCAC 7H (or other). Please site
rule.
(3) Inconsistency with the local Land Use Plan (Please elaborate).
(4) Inconsistency with Rules, Guidelines or Standards of
this agency or a finding that the project is in conflict
with other authority or interest as stipulated below.
(E) Attachment. Include memorandum or other documentation that support
findings relating to D1-4 or provide general comments..
Signature
ate
or DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT * Lat:34042122"N
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT Long:76058135"W
* * * *
MODIFICATION - PERMIT #120-88
1. APPLICANT'S NAME Broad Reach Investments, Inc.
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE Hwy 24, west of Sanders Creek, east of
the community of ocean, on Bogue Sound, Carteret County.
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: DREDGE & FILL CANA X (ONLY)
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE:
(A) DATES OF SITE VISIT 12-28-88
(B) WAS APPLICANT PRESENT NO
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: APPLICATION RECEIVED December 27, 1988
OFFICE Morehead City
(as amended 12/2/88)
6. SITE DESCRIPTION: (A) LOCAL LAND USE PLAN Carteret County
Transition/
LAND CLASSIFICATION FROM LUP Residential
DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS IDENTIFIED IN LUP SEE
CAMA REVIEW SECTION
(BY AEC(S) INVOLVED: OCEAN HAZARD ESTUARINE SHORELINE X
COASTAL WETLANDS PUBLIC TRUST WATERS
ESTUARINE WATERS OTHER
(C) WATER DEPENDENT: YES X NO
(RESIDENTIAL)
(D) INTENDED USE: PUBLIC PRIVATE X COMMERCIAL
(E) TYPE OF WASTE WATER TREATMENT: EXISTING N/A
PLANNED package plant
(F) TYPE OF STRUCTURES: EXISTING N/A
PLANNED permitted Boat Basin B - 75 slips; drystack storage
195 units
(G) ESTIMATED ANNUAL RATE OF EROSION N/A SOURCE bulkhead
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION:
(A) VEGETATED WETLANDS
NONE
(B) NON-VEGETATED WETLANDS:
NONE
(C) OTHER:
HIGHGROUND
(D) TOTAL AREA
landscape
etc.
7.58 ac.
Approximate land disturbance 7.58 ac.
AREA
DREDGED FILLED OTHER
* U.S.G.S. 7.5 MIN. TOPO 'SALTER PATH' PR 1983
or 40
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT - BROAD REACH INVESTMENTS, INC.
CARTERET COUNTY
PAGE #2
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to modify Permit
#120-88-to allow construction of a drystack storage facility
measuring 350' x 135' on the highground adjacent to Basin B
in the Transition/Residential Land Classification.
9. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION: The project site is located off
Highway 24, just west of Sanders Creek, and east of the
community of ocean, on Bogue Sound, in Carteret County. The
developers of 'Broad Reach' were issued a State CAMA/Dredge
and Fill Permit in June of 1988. Permit #120-88 authorizes
the development of a subdivision and the excavation of a 75
slip highground marina basin, known by its location as Basin
'B'. As part of the restrictive permit conditions, the
original commercial drystack storage marina located at Basin
'A' was found to be inconsistent with the Carteret County
Land Use Plan and was therefore deleted from the approved
project. The developers have worked since the permit was
issued with Carteret County and the Coastal Resources
Commission to have the Land Use Plan and the Land
Classification scheme changed to accommodate higher density
residential use and the development of a non-commercial type
marina. On November 21, 1988, Carteret County adopted the
Land Classification change from 'Community' to
'Transition/Residential'. The Coastal Resources Commission
certified the amendment changes on December 2, 1988.
Today, the developers of Broad Reach propose to modify
Permit #120-88 to allow the construction of a 'drystack
storage building' to be located adjacent to the 'SB' surface
waters of Basin B. This position will place the
non-commercial drystack building some 600' from the 'SA'
surface waters of Sanders Bay and Bogue Sound. The proposed
building will be setback 30' from the bulkheaded basin and
will measure 350' long x 135' wide. It will house on tiered
racks 195 boats in a class under 30' in length. The
drystack building will occupy 47,250 sq. ft. within the area
designated as 'Transition/Residential'. A 75' long concrete
driveway will connect the drystack building to the boat
ramp. The modification request involves a 7.58 ac. section
of land surrounding Basin B which was identified in the
original permit. As calculated by the developer, only 24.3%
of the LAMA Estuarine Shoreline AEC will be rendered
impervious. Rainwater-runoff will be collected from the
drystack building and the adjacent asphalt parking lot, and
directed to grassed swells and retention areas away from the
AEC. The applicant has provided, on the revised workplat
Sheet 2 of 2, a narrative

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT - BROAD REACH INVESTMENTS, INC.
CARTERET COUNTY
PAGE #3
description of the Stormwater Management Plan. Finally, the
proposed modification includes a parking lot of about 6,000
sq. ft. and necessary restrooms with septic tank and leech
fields.
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS: The proposed permit modification will
render about 27,000 sq. ft. of the total LAMA AEC (110,500
sq. ft.) as impervious. This includes the drystack storage
building and a portion of the parking lot and concrete ramp.
These figures, along with the proposed Stormwater Management
Plan, should control the runoff of pollutants into the 'SB'
surface waters of Basin B. The drystack storage facility
will allow an additional 195 boat owners within the 725 lot
subdivision to have water access available in a marina basin
without generating the potential long-term impacts due to
wetslip dockage. The applicable 28 permit conditions to the
Broad Reach development will continue to help safeguard the
local estuarine environment as construction begins and the
project grows to maturity around the permitted marina basin-
CANA REVIEW SECTION: The non-commercial nature of the
proposed drystack storage facility appears to be consistent
with the Land Use Plan where the unzoned area of Carteret
County has been reclassified as 'Transition/Residential'.
PREPARED BY: JAMES L. MERCER
DATE: DECEMBER 28, 1988
4, .
Please type or print. Carefully describe all an-
ticipated development activities, including construc-
tion, excavation, filling, paving, land clearing, and
stormwater control. If the requested information is
not relevant to your project, write N/A (not ap-
plicable). Items 1-4 and 8-9 must be completed for
all projects.
1 APPLICANT
a. Name Broad Reach Investments, Inc.
Address PO Bo zc 15 5 0
City Raleigh State NC
in 27602 832-0594
Day phone 919-
X Landowner or Authorised agent
b. Project name (if any) Broad Reach
c. If the applicant is not the landowner, also give
the owner's name and address.
Land Planners Authorized.Agent
Paton/Zucchino Associates, P.A.
Cooper Square, 17 Glenwood Ave.
D. 1 e4 rsl-% mr. 97661 91Y-834-8620
a. Street address or secondary road number.
Highway 24
b. City, town, community, or landmark
Ocean.NC
c. County Carteret
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? No County Jurisdiction
e. Name of body of water nearest project
Bogue Sound west of Sanders Creek
*°D RIP nOMIM to- .r ..:
? ,JSEh'O 1PR_0P0S,t15 P?tO] q,
a. Describe all development activities you propose.
(for example, building a home, motel, marina,
Carina °idpyr)stack, roadway, parking
and-associated support acs rtes.
If you plan to build a marina, also complete
and attach Form DCM-MP-2.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an ex-
is * pro e& new work, or both?
c. Will the project be for community, private, or
commercial use
Community n
88
d. Describe the planned use of the project.
ary stark ctarage and service
fn?cP bw rniPrt rPgi dPntS _
s??,?i • r` 1as `, ,?11'i11M Ytir?'`f r z T ?'?':1
A. W..
is S
H?4RT't'TYC^;
??:L i+" .?. ? ' .+1, _.. rt • t., vi!' M .!3 :, SN 1 7: •.
a. Size of entire tract 978 acres
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A
c. Elevation of tract above mean sea ev l or Na-
tional Geodetic Vertical Datu . 10 feet MSL
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tractWando soil
neries, fine sandy loam
e. Vegetation on tract o 1 d f i e 1 d
f. Man-made features now on tract N /A
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan Classifica-
tion of the site? (Consult the local land use
plan.)
Conservation X Transitional
Developed Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government? ,
Unzoned
i. How ate adjacent waters classified? SA
j. Has a professional archaeological survey been
carried out for the tract? - yes
If so, by whom? S;arol i na Archaeological
S ryiCes
P
Complete this section if the project includes any
upland development.
a. Type and number of buildings, facilities, or
structures proposed wry storage facility
for 195 boats
b. Number of lots or parcels One
c. Density (Give the number of residential units
and the units per acre.) N /A
d. Size of ar t o ;dG ed or disturbed
es
e. If the proposed project will disturb more than
one acre of land, the Division of Land
Resources must receive an erosion and sedimen-
tation control plan at least 30 days before land
disturbing activity begins. If applicable, has a
sedimentation and erosion control plan been
submitted to the Division of Land Resources.?
v?
Give the percentage of the tract iv.ithin 75 feet
€ of mean high water to be covered bym
permeable surfaces, such as .paxxement,
o buildings, or rooftops. 2i = 3'x
F

g. List the materials, such as marl, paver stone, b. Amount of material to be excavated from
asphalt, olcco?a ? to b used foorgjed below water level in cubic yardsNJA
surfaces. p c. Type of material N / A
d. Does the area to be excavated include marsh-
h. If applicable, has a stormwater management land, swamps, or other wetlands? N IA
plan been submitted to the Division of En- e. High ground excavation, in cubic yards N JA_
vironmental Management? yes f. Dimensions of spoil disposal area NIA
i. Describe proposed sewage dis sal and/or wast
4 g. Location of spoil disposal area N.14
l
water treatment facilities. Conventiona
septic tank, interim package
h.
Do you claim title to the disposal area? N/A
Tertiary ant - uture
j. Have these facilities received state or local If not, attach a letter granting permission from
approval? No the owner.
k. Describe existing treatment facilities. i. Will a disposal area be available for future
None
maintenance?/ N/A
If so, where?
j. Does the disposal area include any marshland,
.1. Describe location and type of discharges to swamOland,br water areas? _T / A
waters of the state (for example;, surface runoff, k. Will the fill material be placed below mean
sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial . high water? N / A
effluent, or "wash down,,). Minimal . 1. Amount of fill in cubic yards N
JA
stormwater discharg anticipated in. .
Type of fill material N/A
n. Source of fill material NIA
m. Water supply source r ate well/water o. Will fill material be placed on marsh or other
n. If the project is oceanfront development, s Y s t em wetlands? N IA
describe the steps that will be taken to main- p. Dimensions of the wetland to be filled N / A
tain established puWeach accessways or pro- q. How will excavated. or fill material be kept on
vide new access. site and erosion controlled? NTA
o. If the project is on the oceanfront, what will r. What type of construction equipment will be
be the elevation aboven sea level of the used (for example, dragline, backhoe, or
first habitable floor? hydraulic dredge)? N /A
??` ?XCAVATIbN AND ?"ILL?' '"?

INFO t
F?
RMATION s. Will wetlands be crossed nsPorting equip-

??}'
h
TI
f
? ?
,, -? ,
ment to t
e project site. I
yes, explain
the steps that will be take tg lessen en.
?A
a. Describe below the purpose of proposed excava- vironmental impacts.
tion or fill activities (excluding bulkheads,
which are covered in Section 7).
Length Width 'Depth
Access channel
(MLW) or (NWI') TSHORELINE'S'I`A t, 'W ;Xb1

' Boat basin
- a. Length of bulkhead or riprap N /A
&er (break- b. Average distance waterward of mean high water
water, pier, or normal water level N /A
boat ramp, c. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months,
rock jetty) in feet N JA A
d. Type of bulkhead material $/A
placed in
Fill
Fill placed e.

- Amount of fill, in cubic yards, to be placed

wetlan

f below mean high water N/A

T
e of fill material N /4
(?- J
MHW
(j • yp
Upland
D E C 2 7 198,18
areas
7
8 . ADDITIONAL` INFORkhtibO 4 a
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
viA Pa?.? 12r1 s?
-DCVY1 y , Aec.4
A copy oI' the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims
title to the affected property. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then for-
ward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permis-
sion from the owner fo carry out the project.
A list of previous state or federal permits issued
for work on the project tract. Include permit
numbers rmittee, and issui at
_caMa• 1K20-8$/, , 79$
gnarl Raar}i ?TTnnvP at-mA„t. Tnc-
A check for $106 made payable to the Depart-
ment of Natural Resources and Community
Development to cover tile costs of processing the
application. VCS ISV
A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in ocean-
front and inlet-areas.
An accurate work plat (including plan view and A statement on the use of public funds. If the
cross sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black project involves the expenditure of public funds, st-
ink on 8 V2 x 11 white paper. (Refer to Coastal tach a statement documenting compliance with the
Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a detailed North Carolina Environmental Policy Act
description.) (N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to 10).
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
9 CERTIFICA`TI AND MMI
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if 16 SIGN TO El TtR ON 1<AND
high quality copies are provided by the a
licant
pp
.
(Contact the U.S.. Army Corps of Engineers regard.
Any permit issued in response to this application
ing that agency's use of larger drawings.) A site or will allow only the development described in the
location map is a part of plat requirements and it application. The project will be subject to condi-
must be sufficiently detailed to guide agency per- tions and restrictions contained in the permit.
sonnel unfamiliar with the area to the site. Include
county road (SR) numbers, landmarks, and the like. I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the pro-
posed activity complies with the State of North
A stormwater management plan, if applicable, that Carolina's approved Coastal Management Program
may have been developed in.consultation with the and will be conducted in a manner consistent with
Division of Environmental Management. such program.
A list of the names and complete addresses of the I further certify that I am authorized to grant, and
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners. These do in fact, grant permission to representatives of
individuals' have 30 days in which to submit com- state and federal review agencies to enter on the
ments on the proposed project to the Division of aforementioned lands in connection with
Coastal Management. The applicant must advise evaluating information related to this permit ap-
the adjacent landowners of this opportunity by sen- plication and follow-up monitoring of project.
ding a copy of the permit application to them by
registered or certified mail. This notification is re- This is the 22 day of December
quired by G.S. 113-229(d). '
19 T
?flame Charles T. Shilstone A?1,
X ?YtitGG l u a
.
ane
Address
Be Landowner or Aut riz ent
e
o
NC
NF,
28570
?Name W • B • Fowler & T . M .. Singleton Send the completed app ication materials to the
Address 5214 Bo ue Sound Drive
_ Division of Coastal Management Office nearest you
Emeral
U Isle, NC 28557 and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. See the
Name map on the inside front cover for the appropriate
Address DCM office and addresses and phone number.
No ?280a.8?
Z
FP rp
D E C 2 71988 14
1J i'J
_--- -------- ---------------

Form DCM-MP-2
MARINA
DEVELOPMENT
Attach this form to the Application for Permits to
Develop in North Carolina's Coastal Area. Be sure
to complete all other sections of that application
which relate to this proposed project, including
upland areas, even if duplicative. All shore-based
facilities must be included in application and work
plats.
1 MARINA .CHARACTERISTICS
a. Check below the type of marina proposed.
Commercial Public
- Residential
b. Will the marina be open to the general public?
c. If there is residential development associated
with the rina },ow, man . or lots are
planned?e s P'Isximut'7`'}?
d. Check all of the types of service to be
provided.
X Full service, including travel
lift and/or rail
Dockage, fuel, and marine supplies
Dockage ("wet slips") only
X Number of slips
Dry storage
Number of boats 195
Boat ramp(s)
Other (describe)
e. Check below the proposed type of siting.
\ V Land cut and access channel
!.¢ Open water with dredging for basin
and/or channel
Open water, no dAing required
Other (describe)
f. Describe the typical boats to be served (for ex-
ample, open runaout, charter boats, sail boats,
or mixed types). 1'?ixed types
g. Typical boat length 18 ' to
h. Maximum boat length
i. Are any floating buildings planned? No
if so, describe.
?' MARINA. ?7P?ERA'I'?QZ`7S n:?{a? ?j ?, ,
a. Check each of the following sanitary facilities
which will be included in the proposed project.
X Office toilets
?- Toilets for patrons
Number Z
Location in facility
Showers
Boat holding tank pumpout
Type and location at marina
(previous permit)
b. Describe treatment type and location for all
sanitary wastewater. Conventional Septic
Tank
c. Describe solid waste, fish offal, and trash
disposal. Solid waste in dumpster
d. How will overboard discharge of sewage from
boats be controlled? N /A
e. Give the location and number of "No Sewage
Discharge" signs proposed. N/A
f. Describe the special design, if applicable, for
containing industrial type pollutants, such as
paint, sandblasting waste, and petroleum pro-
ducts. N/A
g. Where will residue be disposed of? N/A
h. Give the number of channel markers and "No
Wake" signs proposed. N/A
Note: Regulatory signs such as these require ad-
ditional approval by the N.C. Wildlife
DEC 2 7 1988 it Resources Commission.
4

i. Give the location of fuel handling facilities and
describe the safety mr flKes planned to protect
area water quality.
j•
Describe design measures that promote boat
basin flushing or girfxlation and reduce water
quality impacts.
k. What will be the marina p*X on overnight
and live-board dockage?
1. Is the proposed marina located near any
shellfish leases? If so, gWe kie name and
address of the leaseholder.
m. If this project is an expansion of an existing
marina, what typ Weo sesrlr S are currently
provided? P
n. How many slips are now available?
DEC 2 7 1988
M.__. ......... -----
5