20181552 Ver 1_Updated PCN_20181210

Strickland, Bev
From: Barksdale, Flynt <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2018 11:50 AM
To: Roden Reynolds, Bryan K CIV (US)
Cc: DePalma, Alicia; Bailey, Stephen; Darr, Alex; Worthington, Bobby L.
Subject: Re: SAW -2018 -02133 -Mill Creek Stream Restoration (Notice of Pre -Construction
Notification ) 1 of 3
Attachments: Pages 1.29 from Mill Creek PCN V2 12.7.2018.pdf
Bryan,
Thank you for working with us on this project. Please see the attached for your review. As discussed I have separated the
PCN in 3 emails for ease of transfer. I have also included responses to your comments in the text below.
Please let me know if you any questions.
W. Flynt Barksdale, PWS
Senior Scientist I Environmental Services
Pcm
Pond 13500 Parkway Lane I Suite 500
Peachtree Corners, GA 30092
p 678.336.7740 1 f 678.336.7744 1 direct: 678.459.2470 1 mobile: [phone]
www.pondco.com
Mr. Barksdale,
On November 13, 2018, we received the Pre -Construction Notification you submitted on behalf of Duke Energy on a
property located in Forsyth County, North Carolina. I have completed my initial review of the report and I have
determined that it is incomplete. The following information is necessary before I will issue a Nationwide Permit:
a. The Pre -Construction Notification was not signed and dated. For the Pre -Construction Notification to be considered
valid and complete the applicant or agent, acting for the applicant, must sign and date the Pre -Construction Notification
package. Please see reference screenshot below for where signature and date is needed.
LFRM Iant Dwla"O" iGwvF;4qWr"enu
sa WA a"prU�+V.l Ow': r41 A FEMA4*M9nw A 7 I ril ��� no
7F. F F"W Oas +yCS McP14
F14 L%VAI a pr" �r �w l -m " I dGrrrAe. iW vrU �c ��ft Ymnry
I. r.rx�
ft MW *"No) Od %du ,ire b ff-" ft IYn dwummwow
A rAgWO P*'.!h4
1�p�+f� NGWx� li wi4 dl' ray �hp�
Signature has been added

b. You requested a Nationwide Permit 14 (Linear Transportation Projects) for some of the proposed permanent stream
and wetland impacts. However, this project does not qualify for a Nationwide Permit 14; as a Nationwide Permit 14
clearly states "Activities required for crossings of waters of the United States associated with the construction,
expansion, modification, or improvement of linear transportation projects (e.g. roads, highways, railways, trails, airport
runways, and taxiways) in waters of the United States." The proposed impacts you associated with a Nationwide Permit
14 could be permitted under a Nationwide Permit 12 (Utility Line Activities). Under a Nationwide Permit 12, it states the
following "...authorizes the discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States and structures or work
in navigable waters for crossings of those waters associated with the construction, maintenance, or repair of utility
lines..." In addition this permit authorizes access roads and states "... the construction of access roads for the
construction and maintenance of utility lines..." I have attached Nationwide Permits 12 and 14 for your reference.
Please revise your Pre -Construction Notification package accordingly.
We will proceed with requesting a NWP 12.
c. You requested a Nationwide Permit 27 (Aquatic Habitat Restoration, Enhancement, and Establishment Activities) for
some portion of stream impacts. Nationwide Permit 27 states "To be authorized by this Nationwide Permit, the aquatic
habitat restoration, enhancement, or establishment activity must be planned, designed, and implemented so that it
results in aquatic habitat that resembles an ecological reference." In your Pre -Construction Notification package you did
not provide a restoration plan which typically includes natural stream channel design. Your Pre -Construction Notification
lacked sufficient detail to justify permitting portions of this proposed project under Nationwide Permit 27. The only
detail that was provided stated "The stream restoration activities will include erosion and sediment control, bank
stabilization, instream installation of run, riffle, pool complex,..." This statement does not qualify as a stream restoration
plan. You need to develop this plan to include, but not limited to, types of natural materials used, amount of natural
material used, type of channel designs/improvements, etc. Therefore, please include a detailed Stream Restoration Plan
as part of the revised Pre -Construction Notification package.
The cover letter has been modified to include the following statement: The stream restoration activities will include installation of
erosion and sediment control (E&SC) best management practices (BMPs), bank stabilization, instream installation of run, riffle, pool
complex utilizing Rosgen natural stream design techniques, backfilling to preconstruction conditions, and implementing final
stabilization.
In addition, an Attachment E "Project Plans", has been included
d. In Part C(3)(a), you listed the 635 linear feet of stream impacts to Mill Creek as temporary. However, these stream
impacts would be considered permanent. Please revise the Pre -Construction Notification package accordingly.
C(3)(a) has been corrected to indicate that 635 LF of stream stabilization is a permanent impact. However, permanent impact is
typically associated with dredge and/fill impacts. We do not propose mitigation for these impacts
e. In the Pre -Construction Notification package, you state "Three culverts are to be installed for permanent crossings of
PNG right-of-way." Please justify why these additional crossings are needed for the utility line right-of-way and why
current maintenance access for this existing utility line is not and will not be utilized, thus requiring the additional
permanent stream impacts. As currently presented, these permanent stream impacts to install culvert crossings do not
demonstrate avoidance and minimization.
The following paragraph on the cover letter has been revised: Waters of the US include three perennial streams and three PEM
wetlands within the immediate vicinity of the project area. As part of the Mill Creek restoration project, Piedmont Natural Gas
proposes permanent, engineered culverts on the tributaries to Mill Creek along Piedmont's existing natural gas pipeline
right-of-way (ROW) as shown on the attached plans and figures. In order to provide stable access to the ROW for
maintenance activities as well as protect the tributary streams from impacts due to crossing of landowner vehicles, such

as ATVs, the culverts are the preferred option. Culverts have been designed and sized by a professional engineer for
each crossing with complete hydrologic studies to carry storm flows and maintain a stable access condition, preventing
bank damage and erosion in the crossing areas.
Supplemental Information B.3.d: Addition of the statement above to the paragraph: Three culverts are to be installed for permanent
crossing of PNG ROW. The installation of culverts is necessary for adequate access to maintain the existing infrastructure and ROW.
The existing pipeline ROW is segmented due to Mill Creek and access to the ROW is only available via Shattalon Drive for
maintenance activities between Mill Creek and Shattalon Drive. Access to the area described is currently limited to times of low flow.
The installation of three culverts is necessary to allow PNG to access and maintain critical infrastructure. The installation of permanent
crossing will minimize continued impacts to waters.
B.3.e — Addition of the same statement included in the cover letter: The stream restoration activities will include installation of erosion
and sediment control (E&SC) best management practices (BMPs), bank stabilization, instream installation of run, riffle, pool complex
utilizing Rogen natural stream design techniques, backfilling to preconstruction conditions, and implementing final stabilization.
- Addition of the statement: The project plans for the stream design are included in this package (Attachment E) and include specifics
regarding the quantities and materials to be used for the stream restoration and culvert installation.
D.1.a — Addition of the following statement: As part of the Mill Creek restoration project, Piedmont Natural Gas proposes
permanent, engineered culverts on the tributaries to Mill Creek along Piedmont's existing natural gas pipeline right-of-
way (ROW) as shown on the attached plans and figures. In order to provide stable access to the ROW for maintenance
activities as well as protect the tributary streams from impacts due to crossing of landowner vehicles, such as ATVs, the
culverts are the preferred option. Culverts have been designed and sized by a professional engineer for each crossing
with complete hydrologic studies to carry storm flows and maintain a stable access condition, preventing bank damage
and erosion in the crossing areas.
f. Have you considered temporary stream impacts for maintenance crossings in the form of articulated grouted mats
instead of culvert crossings?
"As part of the Mill Creek restoration project, Piedmont Natural Gas proposes permanent, engineered culverts on the
tributaries to Mill Creek along Piedmont's existing natural gas pipeline right-of-way (ROW) as shown on the attached
plans and figures. In order to provide stable access to the ROW for maintenance activities as well as protect the
tributary streams from impacts due to crossing of landowner vehicles, such as ATVs, the culverts are the preferred
option. Culverts have been designed and sized by a professional engineer for each crossing with complete hydrologic
studies to carry storm flows and maintain a stable access condition, preventing bank damage and erosion in the crossing
areas."
Please provide the information requested above in ONE consolidated response within 30 -days of the date of this
correspondence. If you do not respond within 30 -days, the request will be administratively canceled. Please contact me
via telephone or e-mail if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Bryan Roden -Reynolds, WPIT
Regulatory Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Regulatory Office
8430 University Executive Park Drive
Charlotte, NC 28262
Office: [phone]
3

The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/f?p=136:4:0

35M Parkway Lane. Suite 5W T; 678.336.7740 I F 678.335.7744
Peachtree Comers. Georgia 30092 www.pondco.com
December 711, 2018
Mr. Bryan Roden -Reynolds
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
51 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
704-510-1440
bryan.roden-reynolds(a)usace.army. miI
Re: Piedmont Natural Gas
Ms. Karen Higgins
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch Supervisor
NC DWR
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
919.707.3630
karen.higgins(a)_ncdenr.gov
Mill Creek Stream Restoration
Forsyth County, North Carolina
Nationwide Permits 12 & 27 — Pre -construction Notification
Water Quality Certification No. 4133 NWP 12 & No. 4134 NWP 27
Dear Mr. Roden -Reynolds & Ms. Higgins,
On behalf of Piedmont Natural Gas (PNG), Pond is pleased to submit this Pre -Construction Notification
(PCN) and supporting documentation for the use of Nationwide Permits (NWP) 12 & 27, pursuant to
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). The proposed project would impact jurisdictional waters of
the US, including wetlands and streams associated with the restoration of approximately 635 linear feet
of streambank in Forsyth County, North Carolina. PNG has an existing pipeline within their easement
bordering Mill Creek; pipe cover has been compromised due to erosion along the streambanks.
The project starts (36.132, -80.335) on Mill Creek along PNG's existing pipeline easement near Winston-
Salem, North Carolina. The proposed streambank stabilization and restoration is along 635 linear feet of
eroded and undercut streambank within and adjacent to PNG and sanitary sewer right-of-way (ROW).
The stream restoration activities will include installation of erosion and sediment control (E&SC) best
management practices (BMPs), bank stabilization, instream installation of run, riffle, pool complex
utilizing Rosgen natural stream design techniques, backfilling to preconstruction conditions, and
implementing final stabilization. The proposed restoration project traverses mostly mixed pine -hardwood
forest and previously cleared riparian areas.
Waters of the US include three perennial streams and three PEM wetlands within the immediate vicinity
of the project area. As part of the Mill Creek restoration project, Piedmont Natural Gas proposes
permanent, engineered culverts on the tributaries to Mill Creek along Piedmont's existing natural gas
pipeline right-of-way (ROW) as shown on the attached plans and figures. In order to provide stable access
to the ROW for maintenance activities as well as protect the tributary streams from impacts due to
crossing of landowner vehicles, such as ATVs, the culverts are the preferred option. Culverts have been
designed and sized by a professional engineer for each crossing with complete hydrologic studies to
All Pond & Company marketing materials are printed on papers containing post -consumer recycled fibers and are FSC Certified.

carry storm flows and maintain a stable access condition, preventing bank damage and erosion in the
crossing areas.
Based on the proposed activity and impacts, this project qualifies under the terms and conditions of
NWPs 12 & 27. We trust the information provided within this document package will be sufficient for your
office to grant the Section 404 & 401 Water Quality Certification approval. If you have any questions or
requests for information please contact Flynt Barksdale (678.459.2470, barksdalef(aD-pondco.com) or
Stephen Bailey (678.336.7740, BaileyS(a)-pondco.com).
Respectfully,
W. Flynt Barksdale, PWS
Senior Scientist
cc: Alicia DePalma
Environmental Siting and Licensing Support
4720 Piedmont ROW Drive
Charlotte, NC 28210
[phone] Office
[phone]
Alicia.depalma(a�duke-energy.com
U!,
Stephen Bailey, PWS
Environmental Services Program Manager
Enclosures:
Attachment A: USACE Documents
Agent Authorization Form
Pre -Construction Notification Form (& Supplemental Information)
ORM Aquatic Resources Table
USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms
Attachment B. Figures
Figure 1. Location Map
Figure 2. Project Overview Map
Figure 3. USGS Topographic Maps
Figure 4. USFWS NWI Map
Figure 5. NRCS Soils Map
Figure 6. Jurisdictional Impact Map
Figure 7. FEMA Map
Attachment C. Project Photographic Log
Attachment D. IPaC Trust Resources Report
Attachment E: Project Plans

Attachment A: USACE Documents
Agent Authorization Form
Pre -Construction Notification Form (& Supplemental Information)
ORM Aquatic Resources Table
USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Project Location: Mill Creek Stream Restoration (36.132, -80.335)
Please Print:
Property Owner: Bobby Worthington, PE - Piedmont Natural Gas
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted project easement, do hereby authorize
Flynt Barksdale of Pond and Company
(Contractor 1 Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of this
permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than above):
4720 Piedmont Row Drive Charlotte, INC 28210
Telephone; 615.872.2332
Authorized roperty Owner (P ed) J Authorized nature
Date: November 23, 2018

0� \NA rE,, �
C, Niii� Y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 & 27 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Mill Creek Stream Restoration
2b.
County:
Forsyth
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Winston-Salem
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
See PCN Supplemental Information
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
See PCN Supplemental Information
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Bobby Worthington, PE
3d. Street address:
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
3e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28233
3f.
Telephone no.:
615.872.2332
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑X Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Flynt Barksdale
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Pond and Company
5c. Street address:
3500 Parkway Lane
5d. City, state, zip:
Peachtree Corners, GA, 30092
5e. Telephone no.:
678.336.7740
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
See PCN Supplemental Information
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.133 Longitude: 80.335
1 c.
Property size:
2.6 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Mill Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c.
River basin:
j Yadkin Pee Dee
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is currently under construction by they City of Winston-Salem to replace an existing sanitary sewer pipeline. The land use in the vicinity
includes suburban residential property, agricultural, and forested/grassed parcels. The stream reach in question for the proposed stabilization efforts
is highly eroded and undercut.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.33
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 1,150
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
See supplemental information
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
See supplemental information
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
El Preliminary Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams —tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 P
Culvert
Small -Basin Wetland
No
Corps
0.003
W1 P
Fill
Small -Basin Wetland
No
Corps
0.001
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.004
2h. Comments:
Wetlands are present along the corridor. Any wetlands along construction entrances/exits will be crossed using wetland mats to prevent any potential
impacts. Permanent impacts will occur where three culverts will be placed for stream/wetland crossings along the ROW. Impacts for the installation of
culvert crossings are covered under NWP 12 (Utility Line Activities).
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial (PER) or
Type of
Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)?
jurisdiction
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1 P
Stabilization
Mill Creek
PER
DWQ
30
635
S2 P
Culvert
Tributary to Mill Creek
PER
Corps
2
32
S3 p
Culvert
Tributary to Mill Creek
PER
Corps
2
30
S2 P
Stabilization
Tributary to Mill Creek
PER
Corps
2
15
S3 P
Stabilization
Tributary to Mill Creek
PER
Corps
2
22
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
F 734
3i. Comments:
Streambank stabilization along a total of 635 linear feet of Mill Creek in an effort to prevent further erosion from encroaching on natural gas line within
Piedmont Natural Gas easement. Three permanent culverts will be installed for construction access an maintenance. The 635 LF of impacts along
Mill Creek for streambank stabilization are covered under NWP 27 and the additional 99 LF of impacts are covered under NWP 12.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Tem orar T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
02
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
o
4g. Comments: No open waters are present within the vicinity of the project.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes Q No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then vou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
Yes/No
B2
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
0
0
61. Comments: The project is not located in a protected watershed. No buffer protection is required.
Page 5 of 10

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See PCN Supplemental Information
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
See PCN Supplemental Information
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank: NA
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments: The project is not located in a protected watershed. No buffer protection is required.
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
The
proposed project does not require a Stormwater Management Plan because the proposed action does
not include the construction of any
structure that would introduce impervious surface area to the site. The proposed project only involves streambank
adjustment and stabilization.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Forsyth County, NC
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑X Other: None
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
X Other: NCG 010000
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑X Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑X Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
F1 Yes ❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This
project consists of streambank restoration to maintain an existing natural gas pipeline. No additional development will result from the completion
of this project. The intention of the this project is to maintain and ensure stability of existing infrastructure and will not include any additional
development which could result in a cumulative impact.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The project is not expected to generate any wastewater. Any waste or wastewater that is generated from general construction activities (machinery
use, materials disposal, etc.) will be handled properly and transported off site for appropriate disposal.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or 0 Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
0 Yes ®R No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS IPaC Tool & Field assessment of habitat - There will be no impact to the two listed species: (Northern Long-eared Bat & Small-anthered
Biftercress), No clearing will occur between June 1 and July 31 or within 0.25 miles of Hibernaculum. See supplemental information for explanation.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes © No
0b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Mapping tool
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office GIS Mapping Tool - The closest listed/eligible structure is located 0.5 miles away (FY3222) and has
no potential to be lmpacted from this project.
S. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑X Yes [] No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The proposed project does not Include the installation of any structures within the 100-year floodplain shat would reduce capacity by increasing
ground elevallon.
Sc. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA's National Flo❑d Hazard Layer (NFHL) Viewer
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Applicantl�� 's Printed Name
Date
(Agents signature %-751 d7b`1r ly If an authorization
letter from the applicant is rovided.
Page 10 of 10

US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
PCN Supplemental Information
A.3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Table 1 below presents property owner information including name(s) on recorded deed. Piedmont Natural Gas will
serve as the owner of the Property Easement crossing the properties listed in Table 1 below. Piedmont Natural Gas is
granted the authority to acquire by purchase or condemnation ownership of property for public use or benefit through
the North Carolina General Statute, Chapter 40A (Eminent Domain). Attachment 1 of this document presents the
Property Survey Notification Letter issued by Piedmont Natural Gas to property owners within and surrounding the
proposed easement.
A.3b. Deed Book and Page No.
Table 1 below presents property owner information including deed book and page number.
Table 1. Project Parcel Report
OWNER DB/PG
Parcel
Number
Owner Name
Owner Address
3258/3011
6806-49-4803.00
Womble, Ralph H
3920 Camerille Farm Rd
1632/2911
6807-50-5445.00
Smith, Charlotte M
4113 Ryan Way
3381/3071
6806-69-4416
Hubbard Realty of Winston Salem, Inc.
0 Petree RD
3421/207
6806-59-6146
Robertson, David
1115 Petree RD
B.3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
This project involves the restoration of 635 linear feet of stream bank along Mill Creek in Forsyth County, NC. This
project is to ensure pipe stability for a natural gas line that runs adjacent to Mill Creek and may be compromised due
to eroding stream banks. The stream restoration would stabilize and restore the streambanks as well as correct and
prevent further erosive forces from encroaching into Piedmont Natural Gas right-of-way along Mill Creek.
As part of the Mill Creek restoration project, Piedmont Natural Gas proposes permanent, three engineered culverts on
the tributaries to Mill Creek along Piedmont's existing natural gas pipeline right-of-way (ROW) as shown on the attached
plans and figures. In order to provide stable access to the ROW for maintenance activities as well as protect the
tributary streams from impacts due to crossing of landowner vehicles, such as ATVs, the culverts are the preferred
option. Culverts have been designed and sized by a professional engineer for each crossing with complete hydrologic
studies to carry storm flows and maintain a stable access condition, preventing bank damage and erosion in the
crossing areas.
Piedmont Natural Gas — Mill Creek Stream Restoration Pond & Company
PCN Supplemental Information November 2018

B.3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The Piedmont Natural Gas right-of-way is located in Forsyth County, NC near Pfafftown. The existing natural gas line
and right-of-way runs adjacent to Mill Creek and crosses it in several locations. The proposed project initiates at
(36.113, -80.335) and continues along 635 linear feet of Mill Creek. The stream restoration activities will include
installation of erosion and sediment control (E&SC) best management practices (BMPs), bank stabilization, instream
installation of run, riffle, pool complex utilizing Rogen natural stream design techniques, backfilling to preconstruction
conditions, and implementing final stabilization. The proposed stabilization project traverses mostly mixed pine -
hardwood forest.
Two perennial streams and one wetland along the proposed route will be crossed and culverted for future access and
maintenance of PNG ROW. All stream crossings have been oriented as close to perpendicular as possible to the
stream banks to further minimize impacts. Standard mechanized construction equipment will be used, including but
not limited to excavators and other tracked equipment. Structural and vegetative BMPs will be implemented according
to an E&SC Plan designed for this project and existing site conditions.
The project plans for the stream design are included in this package (Attachment E) and include specifics regarding
the quantities and materials to be used for the stream restoration and culvert installation.
D.1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project.
Preliminary environmental surveys were conducted during the conceptual phase of this project and included field
delineations within and adjacent to the project area to identify all sensitive resources in the area. Using the
environmental data collected, the least impactful design plan was chosen, and additional modifications were made to
reduce impacts at stream and wetland crossings. All stream crossings for culvert installations needed for ROW access
and maintenance have been oriented as close to perpendicular as possible to the stream banks to further minimize
impacts. Within the initial project area surveyed, three perennial streams, one wetland drainage, and three wetlands
were delineated.
The culvert installations have been included in this project to further minimize current potential impacts to streams due
to routine ROW access and maintenance of infrastructure. The installation of the culverts will provide the necessary
infrastructure for PNG to utilize their existing ROW between Shattalon Drive and Mill Creek and minimize the potential
impacts to waters from their routine activities.
D.1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction
techniques.
The culverts to be installed are needed for access during construction as well as continued access for maintenance of
PNG ROW. Erosion and Sediment control measures will be implemented at all stream crossings to minimize impacts
during construction (culvert installation, streambank stabilization). Additionally, construction has been sequenced to
minimize the length of time for which excavations of streams remain in disturbed condition and will be stabilized as
soon as possible.
F.5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or
Designated Critical Habitat?
A list of threatened and endangered species was obtained from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Information
for Planning and Consultation (USFWS IPaC) online database. Two (2) federally listed species, northern long-eared
bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and small-anthered bittercress (Cardamine micranthera), were found to potentially occur
within Forsyth county, according to the IPaC database. Pond ecologists conducted a detailed field survey on June 26,
2018 to identify and locate potential presence of suitable habitat for listed species within the project corridor. Suitable
Piedmont Natural Gas - Mill Creek Stream Restoration Pond & Company
PCN Supplemental Information November 2018

foraging habitat for northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) was present within or adjacent to the project site.
However, USFWS 4(d) Rule states incidental take through tree removal activities is not prohibited unless it results in
removing a known, occupied maternity roost tree; removal activities within 150 feet of a known maternity roost tree
from June 1 to July 31, or removing trees within 0.25 miles of a hibernaculum at any time of year. Online review of
USFWS resources from the Raleigh Ecological Field Office for northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) does
not indicate presence of roost trees or hibernacula in the project area. Habitat for small-anthered bittercress (Cardamine
micranthera) was not present in the project area.
F.7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological
resources?
A desktop survey was conducted using the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office GIS Mapping Tool to
evaluate the presence of cultural resources near the proposed project. There are no documented cultural resources in
the direct vicinity of the project site. The closest listed/eligible cultural resource is located approximately 0.5 mile from
the project site (FY3222). The proposed project activities do not have the potential to impact any cultural resource.
Piedmont Natural Gas — Mill Creek Stream Restoration Pond & Company
PCN Supplemental Information November 2018

Attachment 1. Piedmont Natural Gas Property Survey Notification Letter
Piedmont Natural Gas — Mill Creek Stream Restoration Pond & Company
PCN Supplemental Information November 2018

r6111Piedmont
Natural Cas
Ralph and Anne Womble 5-24-2018
3920 Camerille Farm Rd.
Winston Salem, NC 27106
Re: Piedmont Natural Gas Survey Activity Notice I Mill Creek — Stream Restoration Project
County: Forsyth
PIN Number: 6806-49-4803
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Womble,
In order to protect one of our natural gas pipelines near Petree Road, in Forsyth County, it is necessary for Piedmont
Natural Gas ("Piedmont") to perform stream restoration work on Mill Creek. The stream restoration will prevent further
erosion of the banks where the pipeline crosses the creek, so Piedmont can ensure the proper amount of ground cover
over the pipeline for its continued protection.
To begin this project, a land survey and engineering study is needed to develop the stream restoration plan. A
surveyor's "right -of -entry" is provided for under North Carolina General Statute 40A-11. This letter is to notify you of our
intent to enter the property for the preliminary survey. This does not necessarily mean your property will be impacted
by the final design. Our contracted surveyors and engineers include: POND and Company (Engineering), Land 2
Water (Stream Design), and Regional Land Surveyors.
The survey process is typically routine and minimally disruptive to the property. Piedmont is committed to restoring any
such area to its original state after the survey and assessment process has been completed.
Once Piedmont develops the stream restoration plan, a representative of Piedmont Natural Gas will contact you to
negotiate the purchase of any land rights needed to proceed with this project. As a part of this process, an exhibit of
your property will be prepared, showing where the proposed construction areas and access routes for the stream
restoration project are situated in relation to your property.
Our land agent, John Dietz of Contract Land Staff (CLS), will attempt to contact you after sending this notification to
answer any questions you may have about the survey process and to learn about features of your property we should
be aware of prior to entry. With your permission, we may begin surveying sooner 30 days, however, if you do not grant
permission we will certainly wait the 30 days as required by the NC General Statute referenced above.
If you have any questions, you may contact John Dietz, at 919-247-6621.
Piedmont Natural Gas is committed to being as open and transparent as possible throughout this process and to
minimizing any inconvenience to you. We look forward to working with you and thank you in advance for your
consideration.
Sincerely yours,
Rqzw rrcwlu
Ryan Houck
Real Estate Representative
Piedmont Natural Gas

r6111Piedmont
Natural Gas
Mrs. Charlotte Smith 5-24-2018
4108 Ryan Way
Winston Salem, NC 27106
Re: Piedmont Natural Gas Survey Activity Notice I Mill Creek — Stream Restoration Project
County: Forsyth
PIN Number: 6807-50-5445
Dear Mrs. Smith,
In order to protect one of our natural gas pipelines near Petree Road, in Forsyth County, it is necessary for Piedmont
Natural Gas ("Piedmont") to perform stream restoration work on Mill Creek. The stream restoration will prevent further
erosion of the banks where the pipeline crosses the creek, so Piedmont can ensure the proper amount of ground cover
over the pipeline for its continued protection.
To begin this project, a land survey and engineering study is needed to develop the stream restoration plan. A
surveyor's "right -of -entry" is provided for under North Carolina General Statute 40A-11. This letter is to notify you of our
intent to enter the property for the preliminary survey. This does not necessarily mean your property will be impacted
by the final design. Our contracted surveyors and engineers include: POND and Company (Engineering), Land 2
Water (Stream Design), and Regional Land Surveyors.
The survey process is typically routine and minimally disruptive to the property. Piedmont is committed to restoring any
such area to its original state after the survey and assessment process has been completed.
Once Piedmont develops the stream restoration plan, a representative of Piedmont Natural Gas will contact you to
negotiate the purchase of any land rights needed to proceed with this project. As a part of this process, an exhibit of
your property will be prepared, showing where the proposed construction areas and access routes for the stream
restoration project are situated in relation to your property.
Our land agent, John Dietz of Contract Land Staff (CLS), will attempt to contact you after sending this notification to
answer any questions you may have about the survey process and to learn about features of your property we should
be aware of prior to entry. With your permission, we may begin surveying sooner 30 days, however, if you do not grant
permission we will certainly wait the 30 days as required by the NC General Statute referenced above.
If you have any questions, you may contact John Dietz, at 919-247-6621.
Piedmont Natural Gas is committed to being as open and transparent as possible throughout this process and to
minimizing any inconvenience to you. We look forward to working with you and thank you in advance for your
consideration.
Sincerely yours,
R" tro"4
Ryan Houck
Real Estate Representative
Piedmont Natural Gas

r6111Piedmont
Natural Gas
Hubbard Realty of Winston Salem, Inc. 5-24-2018
1598 Westbrook Plaza Dr Ste 200
Winston Salem, NC 27103
Re: Piedmont Natural Gas Survey Activity Notice I Mill Creek — Stream Restoration Project
County: Forsyth
PIN Number: 6806-69-4416
To Whom it May Concern:
In order to protect one of our natural gas pipelines near Petree Road, in Forsyth County, it is necessary for Piedmont
Natural Gas ("Piedmont") to perform stream restoration work on Mill Creek. The stream restoration will prevent further
erosion of the banks where the pipeline crosses the creek, so Piedmont can ensure the proper amount of ground cover
over the pipeline for its continued protection.
To begin this project, a land survey and engineering study is needed to develop the stream restoration plan. A
surveyor's "right -of -entry" is provided for under North Carolina General Statute 40A-11. This letter is to notify you of our
intent to enter the property for the preliminary survey. This does not necessarily mean your property will be impacted
by the final design. Our contracted surveyors and engineers include: POND and Company (Engineering), Land 2
Water (Stream Design), and Regional Land Surveyors.
The survey process is typically routine and minimally disruptive to the property. Piedmont is committed to restoring any
such area to its original state after the survey and assessment process has been completed.
Once Piedmont develops the stream restoration plan, a representative of Piedmont Natural Gas will contact you to
negotiate the purchase of any land rights needed to proceed with this project. As a part of this process, an exhibit of
your property will be prepared, showing where the proposed construction areas and access routes for the stream
restoration project are situated in relation to your property.
Our land agent, John Dietz of Contract Land Staff (CLS), will attempt to contact you after sending this notification to
answer any questions you may have about the survey process and to learn about features of your property we should
be aware of prior to entry. With your permission, we may begin surveying sooner 30 days, however, if you do not grant
permission we will certainly wait the 30 days as required by the NC General Statute referenced above.
If you have any questions, you may contact John Dietz, at 919-247-6621.
Piedmont Natural Gas is committed to being as open and transparent as possible throughout this process and to
minimizing any inconvenience to you. We look forward to working with you and thank you in advance for your
consideration.
Sincerely yours,
Ryan Houck
Real Estate Representative
Piedmont Natural Gas

r6111Piedmont
Natural Cas
Mr. David Robertson 5-24-2018
1115 Petree Rd.
Winston Salem, NC 27106
Re: Piedmont Natural Gas Survey Activity Notice I Mill Creek — Stream Restoration Project
County: Forsyth
PIN Number: 6806-59-6146
Dear Mr. Robertson,
In order to protect one of our natural gas pipelines near Petree Road, in Forsyth County, it is necessary for Piedmont
Natural Gas ("Piedmont") to perform stream restoration work on Mill Creek. The stream restoration will prevent further
erosion of the banks where the pipeline crosses the creek, so Piedmont can ensure the proper amount of ground cover
over the pipeline for its continued protection.
To begin this project, a land survey and engineering study is needed to develop the stream restoration plan. A
surveyor's "right -of -entry" is provided for under North Carolina General Statute 40A-11. This letter is to notify you of our
intent to enter the property for the preliminary survey. This does not necessarily mean your property will be impacted
by the final design. Our contracted surveyors and engineers include: POND and Company (Engineering), Land 2
Water (Stream Design), and Regional Land Surveyors.
The survey process is typically routine and minimally disruptive to the property. Piedmont is committed to restoring any
such area to its original state after the survey and assessment process has been completed.
Once Piedmont develops the stream restoration plan, a representative of Piedmont Natural Gas will contact you to
negotiate the purchase of any land rights needed to proceed with this project. As a part of this process, an exhibit of
your property will be prepared, showing where the proposed construction areas and access routes for the stream
restoration project are situated in relation to your property.
Our land agent, John Dietz of Contract Land Staff (CLS), will attempt to contact you after sending this notification to
answer any questions you may have about the survey process and to learn about features of your property we should
be aware of prior to entry. With your permission, we may begin surveying sooner 30 days, however, if you do not grant
permission we will certainly wait the 30 days as required by the NC General Statute referenced above.
If you have any questions, you may contact John Dietz, at 919-247-6621.
Piedmont Natural Gas is committed to being as open and transparent as possible throughout this process and to
minimizing any inconvenience to you. We look forward to working with you and thank you in advance for your
consideration.
Sincerely yours,
R" tro"4
Ryan Houck
Real Estate Representative
Piedmont Natural Gas

= J = J = J = J = J = J
O O F O O O O
Oarf of off)�� otf of of
O Q O Q O Q O Q O Q O Q
cn Z U Z U Z U Z U Z U Z U
(D
co
E
OJ
M
M
M
M
M
3
Z
N
U')
00
00
00
00
00
00
CD
til
C
C
E
C
N ca
ca
co
n3
0
O
J
C\j
C14
CA
cq
M
M
M
M
M
2
N
Q6
O
O
O
O
Cfl
_0
Cl)
Cl)
Cl)
Cl)
Cl)
Cl)
c
J
N
CL
T
of
af
of
of
of
ry
cn
O
w
O
w
O
w
O
U
O
U
O
U
L
Q
LL
Q
LL
Q
OCD
Cl)
CD
co
L
N
ti
O
Cl)
O
C
co
O
N
O
N
O
7
O
E
Q
N
d
T
H
I
co
co
caca
m
Ca
C
C
a)
m
:Da
--S;
a
�
Q
0
U
U
2
a�
0
0
U
I
c
-0
N
0
Cl)
U
w
a
w
a
a
= J = J = J = J = J = J
O O F O O O O
Oarf of off)�� otf of of
O Q O Q O Q O Q O Q O Q
cn Z U Z U Z U Z U Z U Z U
(D
E
cc
Z
N
U')
r--
CD
til
C
C
E
C
N ca
ca
co
n3

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Mill Creek Stream Restoration City/County: Forsyth Sampling Date: 27 -Jun -18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: WL 2,5,7 Upland
Investigator(s): FB / AD Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): flat Slope: 0.0 % / 0.0 °
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 in LRR P Lat.: 36.133 Long.: -80.336 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CoA NWI classification: Upland Point
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes * NO ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes * NO ❑
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes * NO ❑
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ NO Is the Sampled AreaDO
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ NO 0
within a Wetland? Y2S ❑ NO
Remarks:
Dry active floodplain with heavy sedimentation. WL 2,5,7 Upland data point is representative of all upland points within the project
boundary.
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required:
check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (Bl)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC -neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ NO
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ NO
Depth (inches):
Yes ❑ NO 0
Saturation Present?Wetland
Yes ❑ NO
Hydrology Present?
Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant
e.__;­�
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Celtis laeviqata
2. Acer nequndo
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Asimina triloba
2. Liqustrum japonicum
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Arundinaria gigantea
2. Liqustrum iaponicum
3. Parthenocissus ouinquefolia
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30
Sampling Point: WL 2,5,7 Upland
Absolute Rel.Strat. IndicatorI Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover Cover Status
10
�
50.0%
FACW
10
�
50.0%
FAC
0
❑
0.0%
❑ 0.0%
0
❑
_
0.0%
_
0
❑
0.0%
_
0
❑
0.0%
_
0
❑
0.0%
_
0
❑
0.0%
_
20
= Total Cover
5❑
50.0%
FAC
5❑
50.0%
UPL
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
_
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
_
0
❑
0.0%
_
0
❑
0.0%
_
0
❑
0.0%
_
_
0
❑
0.0%
10
= Total Cover
0
❑
0.0%
0
E.
0.0%
0
E.
0.0%
_
0
❑
0.0%
_
0
E.
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
_
0
❑
0.0%
_
0
= Total Cover
30
d❑
60.0%
FACW
15
d❑
30.0%
5
❑
10.0%
_UPL
FACU
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
_
0
❑
0.0%
_
_
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
_0.0%
_
0
❑
o.o%
o
❑
o.o%
0
❑_o.o%
0
❑
0.0%
50 = Total Cover
1.
0
L-1-0.0%
2.
0
❑ 0.o%
3.
0
❑ 0.0%
4.
0
❑ 0.0%
5.
0
FI -0.0%
6.
0
❑ 0.0% _
0
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Number of Dominant Species
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 40 x 2 = 80
FAC species 15 x 3 = 45
FACU species 5 x 4 = 20
UPL species 20 x 5 = 100
Column Totals: 80 (A) 245 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.063
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
41 Dominance Test is > 50%
Prevalence Index is :53.0 1
Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
regardless of height.
Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding
vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
in height.
Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1
m) in height.
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes * No O
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOII
Sampling Point: WL 2,5,7 Upland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe 1 Loc2 _ Texture
0-16 10YR 4/4 100
1 Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (SS) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: _
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Remarks
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ NO
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Mill Creek Stream Restoration City/County: Forsyth Sampling Date: 27 -Jun -18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: WL 2, WL 5, WL 7
Investigator(s): FB / AD Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): flat Slope: 0.0 % / 0.0 °
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 in LRR P Lat.: 36.132 Long.: -80.337 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: DaA NWI classification: PF06
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes * NO ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes * NO ❑
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes * NO ❑
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ NO * Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes * NO ❑
within a Wetland? Yes � NO ❑
Remarks:
Active floodplain. Data point collected at WL 2. Data point is representative of all wetlands located within
the property boundary.
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required:
check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (Bl)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)❑
FAC -neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ NO
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ NO
Depth (inches):
U ❑
Saturation Present?Wetland
Yes * NO ❑
Hydrology Present? Yes NO
Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant
C__;­�
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1, Carex vulpinoidea
2. ]uncus effusus
3. Saqittaria latifolia
4. Carex comosa
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30
Sampling Point: WL 2. WL 5. WL 7
Absolute Rel.Strat. IndicatorI Dominance Test worksheet:
Cover Cover Status
0
❑
0.0%
2.
0
❑
0.0%
0
0
❑
0.0%
❑ 0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
6.
0
❑
0.0%
_
0
❑
0.0%
_
0
❑
0.0%
_
0
❑
0.0%
_
0
= Total Cover
0
❑
0.0%
_
0
[7-0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
_
0
❑
0.0%
_
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
_
0
❑
0.0%
_
0
❑
0.0%
_
0
❑
0.0%
_
_
0
❑
0.0%
0
= Total Cover
0
❑
0.0%
o
E.
0.0%
0
E.
0.0%
_
0
E.
0.0%
_
0
E.
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
_
0
❑
0.0%
_
0
= Total Cover
50
d❑
66.7%
OBL
10
❑
13.3%
FACW
10
❑
13.3%
OBL
5
❑
6.7%
OBL
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
_
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
_
o
❑_o.o%
o
❑
o.o%
o
❑
o.o%
o
❑
0.0%
75 = Total Cover
1.
0
L-1-0.0%
2.
0
❑ o.o%
3.
0
❑ 0.0%
4.
0
❑ 0.0%
5.
o
FI -0.0%
6.
o
❑ 0.0% _
0
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Number of Dominant Species
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)
Percent of dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 65 x 1 = 65
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
FACu species 0 x 4 = 0
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 75 (A) 85 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.133
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1/1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
41 Dominance Test is > 50%
V] Prevalence Index is :53.0 1
Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
i Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be Dresent, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
regardless of height.
Sapling/shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding
vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
in height.
Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1
m) in height.
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes * No O
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Soil
Sampling Point: WL 2, WL 5, WL 7
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type 1 Locz Texture
0-8 10YR 4/2 90 7.5YR 5/6 10 C M Clay Loam
8-14 10YR 5/2 70 7.5YR 5/6 30 C M Clay Loam
1 Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
® Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (SS) (LRR N,
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: _
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Remarks
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ 2 cm Muck (ASO) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes * No ❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Attachment B. Figures
Figure 1. Location Map
Figure 2. Project Overview Map
Figure 3. USGS Topographic Map
Figure 4. USFWS NWI Map
Figure 5. NRCS Soils Map
Figure 6. Jurisdictional Impact Map
Figure 7. FEMA Map

r4
�w 94P
�
4
+. C 5 cha6 Sid MC p'o
�T
13
i Z
ab u
2 44■ r
Ph
� o
k YJ
ro �
O rs f.t1auD µ Z c
Mu[[ ayv
—�s
q a
0m�an' e a
O�
p�nasu�•l �' '{h
R .ayir��r'°p8aw
N
Gh[Ir�h �d
01.4
a
d�
a
c
�4
d
7 � y
O 0
� L
U
O
J
U pd
a� �a
Rd 3
1
+u i
1°d
Ui@yy 5
■
m
a
m
a"
�T
"e■d S
MCG`,
N�
HDAV Q! a6
m
U N
W (n
LU (D
� Y
�a
m c
Qm
m vi
7) Z
w
c c
U
0� a
Z m
d
H
Z
W (n
Wa
C)O
Z_ @
U
m �
Z
m
�a
C
U) m
(.9 m
U) L
� H
c `m
Ew
m
0 ami
LLI O
E Y
w N
LU
LL
U)
Y
a)
T
U
O - O
PR
rel

Q t U2
M Q)Zo
3
go O
U E
o
p 1 O
N i Z
�
o
�LL
>
U)
40 Y
U
a.
N
L
N
LL
O
N
LO
L
c�
C
O
O
r
LO
O
N
O
0
O
Q O O
ui
0
U)
Q
U)
D
U
0
Q
U)
W
Z Vl
c C']
off°
0 E 0)L A
N J
t
m z w
c
m _
m
W
U •�E
W
O �
E
O
oU
0 �
(6 n
�r.0
p � ■
N
W Y
.. a
m c
m
0Z
in 0

PD
U
E
m
PD
N L a)
AIM],
PA
S
—1
a
N
7
U
N
�U
O
U
L
O.
m
cm
O
N
0
m
c
O
Z
co
O
N
.21T
CL
O
0
IZ
Cm
G
CL
m
L
co
Q
12
co0
cn
n
M
L
U 00
,a�Zo
Oy TN
d O N
c O
g U E
m
-5,0
Z
�L
LL
E
m
N
PR
I�
hk�
PD
U
E
m
PD
N L a)
AIM],
PA
S
—1
a
N
7
U
N
�U
O
U
L
O.
m
cm
O
N
0
m
c
O
Z
co
O
N
.21T
CL
O
0
IZ
Cm
G
CL
m
L
co
Q
12
co0
cn
n
M
L
U 00
,a�Zo
Oy TN
d O N
c O
g U E
m
-5,0
Z
�L
LL
E
m
N
PR

0
a)
W Y
.. a
m c
m
0Z
in 0
0.
Cm
2G
Z
U)
LL
U)
L
) z o
Oy TN
d C �
C C)
gV E
a)
p 5, O
N N Z
�
o
LLE
m
a)
U)
a)
a)
O
L
c�
C
O
O
r
LO
O
O
O
LO
O O
�14z
PR
ZO

r
z r
U
� � a
L
O �•
LL �.
1
■
� r
i � 0
0 �
7
87 fir
O—
CO
U
0
NM)
rLML
E
m
ro
AD
m 'c
(o m
a
�_ 7CO
O 0
Hcu
o Fu
C CO
O C:
U N
� 7 �
a � pie
t U 00
a)Zo
Oy TN
d C �
c 0
gV E
p 1 O
N i Z
�
o
LLE
m
a)
U)
a)
T
U
0
L
c�
C
L
O
LO
0 0
PR
ZO
re,

0.
Cm
G
a
LU
LL
ti
L
LL
z o
Oy TN
d C �
C 0 L
gV E
i L >
O 1 O
N N Z
�
o
LL
E
m
N
U)
Y
N
N
U
5
V/�!
rV
C( n
0—
E
�� a
ro21
d: z
W
PR
re,

Attachment C. Project Photographic Log

Mill Creek Stream Restoration
Preconstruction Notification Attachment C: Photographic Log
ems.
Photograph 1: Existing site condition — stream crossing over Mill Creek for sanitary sewer replacement
Photograph 2: Existing stream condition — actively eroding
streambank in foreground with temporary riprap repair

Mill Creek Stream Restoration
Preconstruction Notification Attachment C: Photographic Log
Photograph 3: Existing stream crossing used by adjacent landowners
Photograph 4: Mill Creek looking upstream

Mill Creek Stream Restoration
Preconstruction Notification Attachment C: Photographic Log
Photograph 5: Mill Creek looking downstream
Photograph 6: Mill Creek looking downstream with temporary stream
crossing in place for sanitary sewer installation

Mill Creek Stream Restoration
Preconstruction Notification Attachment C: Photographic Log
,.-�■,rf �; •' mss-
r •- r.
Photograph 7: Wetland 2 north of Mill Creek
Photograph 8: Perennial stream 4 north of Mill Creek

Mill Creek Stream Restoration
Preconstruction Notification Attachment C: Photographic Log
Photograph 9: Perennial stream 6 north of Mill Creek
Photograph 10: Linear wetland 5 north of Mill Creek

Attachment D. IPaC Trust Resources Report

IPaC U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
PaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat
(collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS)
jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below, The list
may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be
directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood
and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional
site-specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of
proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS
office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section
that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for
additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Forsyth County, North Carolina
Local office
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
t. [phone]
1B [phone]
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
http://www.fws.gov/nc-es/es/countyfr.html

Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of
project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species.
Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of
the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a
dam upstream of a fish population, even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly
impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move,
and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near
the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site-specific and
project -specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary
information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area
of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any
Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can
only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in
IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website
and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3, Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
S. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species! and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAH Fisheries).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this
list. Please contact NOAH Fisheries for Species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows
species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more
information.
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Mammals
NAME STATUS

Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Small-anthered Bittercress Cardamine micranthera Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.govlec plspec ie s/3452
Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered
species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Acts.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory
birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing
appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bold and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www,fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds
of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn
more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ
below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on
this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general

public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E -bird data mapping tool (Tip:
enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the
Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird
species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and
other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to
reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at
the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your
project area.
NAME
BREEDING SEASON (IF A
..............................................................
BREEDING SEASON IS INDICATED
........................................ ........ ...... ........ ....................
FOR A BIRD ON YOUR LIST, THE
............................................. ...... ...... ...... ............
BIRD MAY BREED 1N YOUR
........................................................................
PROJECT AREA SOMETIME WITHIN
....................... ...... ..... .... ..... ..
THE TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED,
... ..... .....
WHICH IS A VERY LIBERAL
. ...... ... ...... ............ . ........
ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE
...................................................
N,WHICH THEBIRD BREEDS
.....................................................................
ACROSS ITS ENTIRE RANGE.
............. ..................................................................
_
"BREEDS ELSEWHERE"INDICATES
....................................................................................................
THAT THE BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY
.....................................................................................................
BREEDIN YOUR PROJECTAREA.)
...................... .................. .... .................................. .....................
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but
warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development
or activities. '( s
https://ecos,fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Blue -winged Warbler Vermivora pinus
Breeds May 1 to Jun 30
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC} only in particular Bird
Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Cerulean Warbler Dendroica cerulea Breeds Apr 28 to Jul 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2974
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus vociferus Breeds May 1 to Aug 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus Breeds Apr 20 to Aug 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.

Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCQ throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC} throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska. \0\\
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC} throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
jN3llllllll1l0e
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ
"Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to
interpret this report.
Probability of Presence( )
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4 -week months.)
A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be
used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the
presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the
week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that
week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was
found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence
is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence
across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted
Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any
week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is
0.05/0.25 = 0.2.

3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of
presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its
entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed an probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the I Okm grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week. N�o-
Survey Timeframe -.0 Vs
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all
years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
4k 4.wvp%N-00
probability of presence %. breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JLN JUL
Band Eagle +T�� TT4 t♦ I I I I f I 11 I 1111
Non BCC Vulnerable
is is not a Bird of
..................
Conservation
Concern (BCC) in this
area, but warrants
.......................
attention because of
.. ...... .........................
the Eagle Act or for
potential
susceptibilities in
.......................
offshore areas from
certain types of
development ori
activities.)
Blue -winged
Warbler
BCC - BCR (This is a
...............................................
Bird of Conservation
Concern (BCC) only in
.....................................................
particular Bird
.............. .....................
Conservation Regions
....................................................
(BCRs) in the
...............................
continental USA)
.........................................
Cerulean Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
is is a Bird
.........................
of Conservation
.......................................
Concern (BCC)
throughout its range
in the continental
...........................................
USA and Alaska.)
.........................................
AUG 57P OCT NOV DEC

Eastern Whip
poor -will
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a Bird
...............................................
of Conservation
.......................................
Concern (BCC)
...................................
throughout its range
..................................................
in the continental
...........................................
USA and Alaska.)
Kentucky Warbler
BCC Rangewide
....................................
(CON) (This is a Bird
of Conservation
Concern {BCC)
throughout its range
.......
continental
USA and Alaska.)
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This Is a Bird
. .............................................. .
of Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its range
in the continental
USA and Alaska.)
-11 -
Prothonotary
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a Bird
rvation
Concern{BCC)
throughout its range
in the continental
USA and Alaska.)
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a Bird
of Conservation
Concern {BCC)
......hr..........................
toughout its range
in the continental
ll5A and Alaska.)
Rusty Blackbird
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a Bird
of Cdl7servatian
Concern (BCC)
throughout Its range
. ........................................ .
in the continental
...........................................
USAan
........... �pd Alaska.).
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide
.............
(CON) (This .is a Bird
...............................................
.o..f .Co....sevaio
.n
Con.cern (BC)...
.............................
throughout its range
.................................................
in the continental
.USA .a..n...d....A.a...s...k..a..)..
++++ ++++ ++++ I i I I i i fi g++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
'tt, O�v
t �U
�f00 d I I I I I I I I ++++ ++++ +}}+ +++t ++++ ++++ I I 111
44 ++4 +44 1111 61111111111 11111 1111 0000 1111 ���+ ++++ ++++
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at
any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to
occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and

avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to
occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures and/or
permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or
bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species
that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network
(AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is
queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 1 Okm grid cell(s) which your project
intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that
area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore
activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is no
representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your
project area, please visit the E -bird Expiore Data Tool. %Nftwo,
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the
Avian Knowledge Network (AKN).. This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen
science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To
learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the
Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e, breeding, wintering, migrating or
year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide. or
(if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology NeotropicaI Birds
guide. if a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur
in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range
anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the
continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of
the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from
certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to
avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For
more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird

impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of
bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal
also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review.
Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS
Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year,
including migration, Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on
marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam
Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?r
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid vicilating t e
Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority
concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be
in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring
in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10
km grid cells) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar} and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a
red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of
presence score can be viewed as more dependabte. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack
of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting
point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there,
and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to loon for to
confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or
min lmize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed, To learn more about
conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize
impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
Wildlife refuges and fish hatcheries
REFUGE AND FISH HATCHERY INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory

Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404
of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update
our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual
extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
The area of this project is too large for IPaC to load all NWI wetlands in the area. The list below
may be incomplete. Please contact the local U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service office or visit the NWI
map for a full fist.
FRESHWATER EMERGENT WETLAND
PEM1A
PEM1 C
PEM1 Cd
PEM1 Ch
PEM1Ax
PEM1 Fh
PEM1Ah
PEM1 F
FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRLJB WETLAND
PF01A
PSS1 �-
PF01C 10
PF01Ah
PSS1Ax
PSS1 C F
PF01Ax
PF01Ad
PF01Cd
PSS1 Ch
PSS1Ah
PF01Fh
PSS1 Fh
PSS1 F
PSS1 Cd
FRESHWATER POND
PUBHh
PUBKx
PUBHx
PUSCh
PUSCx

PUSC
PAB4Hh
PUBF
PAB3Hh
PUBFx
LAKE
L1 UBHh
RIVERiNE
R4SBC
R2UBH
R5UBH
R3UBH
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Invgntory w i
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high
altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography, A margin of error
is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in
revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experlence of the image analysts,
the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted.
Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be
occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and
the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial
imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged
aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters.
Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory.
These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a
different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this
inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish
the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in
activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal,
state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may
affect such activities.

Attachment E. Project Plans

MILL CREEK
STREAM RESTORATION
FORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
OCTOBER 26, 2018
LOCATION MAP
N.T.S. N
A911 W
PROJECT LOCATION
DRAWING INDEX
SHEET TITLE
DESCRIPTION
PNG-C-200-101
COVER
PNG-C-200-102
CROSSING 1
PNG-C-200-103
CROSSING 2
PNG-C-200-104
EROSION CONTROL
DETAILS
PNG-C-200-105
EROSION CONTROL
DETAILS
PNG-C-200-106
STREAM RESTORATION
PNG-C-200-107
CROSS SECTIONS
PNG-C-200-108
STRUCTURE DETAILS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
POND & COMPANY
STA7ELICENSE#
OWNER: PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
NORTH CAROLINA
PIEDMONT NATURAL Piedmont 4720 PIEDMONT ROW DRIVE
a CHARLOTTE, NC 28210
[phone]NaturaI Gas ■
r6i
3500 Parkway Lane, Suite 500, Peachtree Corners, GA 30092
678.336.7740 1 www.pondco.com

I I TS
1741.3'3/,/\
\
\
\
/�
G
ss/
a
% 41zv —
\ �4 \ 7T
/ 1
Q1 �� l
CROSSING 1 PLAN - PIPES 1 & 2
SCALE: 1" = 10'
EROSION CONTROL LEGEND
w< OUTLET STABILIZATION STRUCTURE
E,L�� SEDIMENT FENCE (SILT FENCE)
MULCHING
SAA
TS
OUTLET STABILIZATION/
STRUCTURE —
SCALE: 1" = 10'
M
r
G
0
z
INVI
GENERAL CIVIL NOTES
1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL COUNTY,
STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO
CONSTRUCTION OF THIS SITE.
2. ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION
SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE
COUNTY AND STATE SPECIFIC SPECIFICATIONS.
3. EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN ARE BASED UPON A
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PROVIDED BY PNG ENERGY.
4. ALL EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOULD BE
CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE AND MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE
CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OR ORDERING
MATERIALS.
5. ALL REQUIRED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
MEASURES SHALL BE PROVIDED, INSTALLED, AND
MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR.
6. ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS SHALL BE DISPOSED AT A
LEGAL, PERMITTED LANDFILL CONSISTENT WITH ALL LOCAL,
STATE, AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS.
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS,
COORDINATES, AND DIMENSIONAL INFORMATION PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BRING ALL
DISCREPANCIES TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER
PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION.
8. AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR, WHICH ARE NOT
PART OF THIS PROJECT, SHALL BE RETURNED TO ORIGINAL
OR BETTER CONDITION PRIOR TO THE COMPLETION OF THE
PROJECT.
J1F IIVIY
PIPE 1 PROFILE
HORZ. SCALE 1"= 10'
VERT. SCALE 1"= 2'
750
z m
O r -
m
745
W o
W z
740
TS TEMPORARY SEEDING CROSSING 1 PROFILES - PIPES 1 & 2
DUST CONTROL
GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES
1. POSITIVE DRAINAGE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES TO
PREVENT SATURATION OF EXPOSED SOILS IN CASE OF
SUDDEN RAINS, AND FOR ALL FINISHED GRADING.
CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR
TO ANY EXCAVATION.
2. INSTALL ALL PERIMETER EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
MEASURES PRIOR TO ANY SITE CLEARING OR EXCAVATION.
3. ALL BACKFILL AND FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE FREE OF
ORGANIC MATTER AND WASTE.
4. REMOVE ALL EROSION CONTROL FENCING FROM THE SITE
PRIOR TO FINAL PROJECT ACCEPTANCE, AND SHALL SMOOTH
THE GROUND SURFACE WHERE THE FENCE WAS REMOVED.
5. ALL CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHALL BE 3:1 OR FLATTER (SEE
PLANS).
6. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS NOTED ARE FINISH GRADE.
STATION
PIPE 2 PROFILE
HORZ. SCALE 1 "= 10'
VERT. SCALE 1 "= 2'
PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED * DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING * USE DIMENSIONS ONLY
PIEDMONT'S NATURAL GAS FACILITY DRAWINGS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL (OM -1095) * DRAWING IS CURRENT ONLY THROUGH THE LATEST REVISED DATE * TO INSURE THERE IS NO RISK OF INAPPROPRIATE
DISCLOSER ALL PREVIOUS PAPER COPIES OF THIS DRAWING MUST BE DESTROYED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RECORDS & INFO. MANAGEMENT RIM POLICY 1001
DATE REVISION(S) DESCRIPTION BY CHK APPD DESCRIPTION APPROVALS
AREA CODE ""w REGIONAL MILL CREEK STREAM RESTORATION
ACCOUNT NUMBER °A N/A ENG
ENGINEER r4�' Piedmont CROSSING 1
PROJECT NUMBER 1180614 DAE NIA`. RMGIR TECH EC&STD Natural Gas WINSTON SALEM NC
DRAWING BY
STATION ID °Are "iTw PRINCIPAL COPYRIGHT 2015 PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CORP.
CHECKER INITIALS 10126/2018 Z ENGINEER CORP. OFCIHARLOTTE, NCE 4720 0821pOW DRIVE Resource Center City, State
750
z
745 O
W
J
W
740
739
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
REF. DWG(S)
SHEET(S) 02 1 DWG SCALE AS SHOWN
DWG DATE 2018-10-26 SUPERSEDED
DRAWING NUMBER REVISION
PNG-C-200-102 -
DISCIPLINE I RESOURCE CENTER I LINE NUMBER
CONTRACTOR TO
\
INSTALL PIPE 1'
INSIDE EASEMENT
1p9
r / d
CONTRACTOR TOFIELD
G
4
LOCATE
/\
_, ✓ ,,0. /
LINE AND INSTALL
PIPE V NORTH OF
GAS LINE
4
/'
\
TRACTOR
TO FIELD
RCp'
OCATEGAS LINE AND INSTALL
PIPE T NORTH OF GAS LINE
V A ��'
� M > �
7 a.z /�
� � /
�
ss
V
\ \ 740.50
M
/
/�
G
ss/
a
% 41zv —
\ �4 \ 7T
/ 1
Q1 �� l
CROSSING 1 PLAN - PIPES 1 & 2
SCALE: 1" = 10'
EROSION CONTROL LEGEND
w< OUTLET STABILIZATION STRUCTURE
E,L�� SEDIMENT FENCE (SILT FENCE)
MULCHING
SAA
TS
OUTLET STABILIZATION/
STRUCTURE —
SCALE: 1" = 10'
M
r
G
0
z
INVI
GENERAL CIVIL NOTES
1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL COUNTY,
STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO
CONSTRUCTION OF THIS SITE.
2. ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION
SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE
COUNTY AND STATE SPECIFIC SPECIFICATIONS.
3. EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN ARE BASED UPON A
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PROVIDED BY PNG ENERGY.
4. ALL EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOULD BE
CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE AND MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE
CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OR ORDERING
MATERIALS.
5. ALL REQUIRED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
MEASURES SHALL BE PROVIDED, INSTALLED, AND
MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR.
6. ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS SHALL BE DISPOSED AT A
LEGAL, PERMITTED LANDFILL CONSISTENT WITH ALL LOCAL,
STATE, AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS.
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS,
COORDINATES, AND DIMENSIONAL INFORMATION PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BRING ALL
DISCREPANCIES TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER
PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION.
8. AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR, WHICH ARE NOT
PART OF THIS PROJECT, SHALL BE RETURNED TO ORIGINAL
OR BETTER CONDITION PRIOR TO THE COMPLETION OF THE
PROJECT.
J1F IIVIY
PIPE 1 PROFILE
HORZ. SCALE 1"= 10'
VERT. SCALE 1"= 2'
750
z m
O r -
m
745
W o
W z
740
TS TEMPORARY SEEDING CROSSING 1 PROFILES - PIPES 1 & 2
DUST CONTROL
GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES
1. POSITIVE DRAINAGE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES TO
PREVENT SATURATION OF EXPOSED SOILS IN CASE OF
SUDDEN RAINS, AND FOR ALL FINISHED GRADING.
CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR
TO ANY EXCAVATION.
2. INSTALL ALL PERIMETER EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
MEASURES PRIOR TO ANY SITE CLEARING OR EXCAVATION.
3. ALL BACKFILL AND FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE FREE OF
ORGANIC MATTER AND WASTE.
4. REMOVE ALL EROSION CONTROL FENCING FROM THE SITE
PRIOR TO FINAL PROJECT ACCEPTANCE, AND SHALL SMOOTH
THE GROUND SURFACE WHERE THE FENCE WAS REMOVED.
5. ALL CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHALL BE 3:1 OR FLATTER (SEE
PLANS).
6. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS NOTED ARE FINISH GRADE.
STATION
PIPE 2 PROFILE
HORZ. SCALE 1 "= 10'
VERT. SCALE 1 "= 2'
PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED * DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING * USE DIMENSIONS ONLY
PIEDMONT'S NATURAL GAS FACILITY DRAWINGS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL (OM -1095) * DRAWING IS CURRENT ONLY THROUGH THE LATEST REVISED DATE * TO INSURE THERE IS NO RISK OF INAPPROPRIATE
DISCLOSER ALL PREVIOUS PAPER COPIES OF THIS DRAWING MUST BE DESTROYED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RECORDS & INFO. MANAGEMENT RIM POLICY 1001
DATE REVISION(S) DESCRIPTION BY CHK APPD DESCRIPTION APPROVALS
AREA CODE ""w REGIONAL MILL CREEK STREAM RESTORATION
ACCOUNT NUMBER °A N/A ENG
ENGINEER r4�' Piedmont CROSSING 1
PROJECT NUMBER 1180614 DAE NIA`. RMGIR TECH EC&STD Natural Gas WINSTON SALEM NC
DRAWING BY
STATION ID °Are "iTw PRINCIPAL COPYRIGHT 2015 PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CORP.
CHECKER INITIALS 10126/2018 Z ENGINEER CORP. OFCIHARLOTTE, NCE 4720 0821pOW DRIVE Resource Center City, State
750
z
745 O
W
J
W
740
739
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
REF. DWG(S)
SHEET(S) 02 1 DWG SCALE AS SHOWN
DWG DATE 2018-10-26 SUPERSEDED
DRAWING NUMBER REVISION
PNG-C-200-102 -
DISCIPLINE I RESOURCE CENTER I LINE NUMBER

\ ) CONTRACTOR TO
IN I EEASEMENT -sem
��743.50
�c 74�
4
TS 7 ''
1 7 cz
746.25 746.25
746.25 ry 746.25
I GAG
I
I
I I
I I �j4
74—
� I I
G GAG
44---''C ——
�
�G G 7 3.00 ��` -- ----- \---------
QTS _
I G �
CONTRACTOR TO OUTLET STABILIZATION
FIELDLOCATE GAS -STRUCTURE
LINE AND INSTALL
/ PIPE V NORTH OF c
/ GAS LINE SS p SS -SS -S-
SS
SS
SS
ssiss���� /------------------
55_ I 1_-----j-
i
CROSSING 2 PLAN
SCALE: 1"=10'
0 5' 10' 20' 30'
SCALE: 1" = 10'
EROSION CONTROL LEGEND
M< OUTLET STABILIZATION STRUCTURE
E,L�� SEDIMENT FENCE (SILT FENCE)
DATE
MULCHING
GENERAL CIVIL NOTES
1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL COUNTY,
STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO
CONSTRUCTION OF THIS SITE.
2. ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION
SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE
COUNTY AND STATE SPECIFIC SPECIFICATIONS.
3. EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN ARE BASED UPON A
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PROVIDED BY PNG ENERGY.
4. ALL EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOULD BE
CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE AND MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE
CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OR ORDERING
MATERIALS.
5. ALL REQUIRED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
MEASURES SHALL BE PROVIDED, INSTALLED, AND
MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR.
6. ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS SHALL BE DISPOSED AT A
LEGAL, PERMITTED LANDFILL CONSISTENT WITH ALL LOCAL,
STATE, AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS.
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS,
COORDINATES, AND DIMENSIONAL INFORMATION PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BRING ALL
DISCREPANCIES TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER
PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION.
8. AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR, WHICH ARE NOT
PART OF THIS PROJECT, SHALL BE RETURNED TO ORIGINAL
OR BETTER CONDITION PRIOR TO THE COMPLETION OF THE
PROJECT.
GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES
1. POSITIVE DRAINAGE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES TO
PREVENT SATURATION OF EXPOSED SOILS IN CASE OF
SUDDEN RAINS, AND FOR ALL FINISHED GRADING.
CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR
TO ANY EXCAVATION.
2. INSTALL ALL PERIMETER EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
MEASURES PRIOR TO ANY SITE CLEARING OR EXCAVATION.
3. ALL BACKFILL AND FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE FREE OF
ORGANIC MATTER AND WASTE.
4. REMOVE ALL EROSION CONTROL FENCING FROM THE SITE
PRIOR TO FINAL PROJECT ACCEPTANCE, AND SHALL SMOOTH
THE GROUND SURFACE WHERE THE FENCE WAS REMOVED.
5. ALL CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHALL BE 3:1 OR FLATTER (SEE
PLANS).
6. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS NOTED ARE FINISH GRADE.
TS TEMPORARY SEEDING CROSSING 2 PROFILE - PIPE 3
DUST CONTROL
REVISION(S) DESCRIPTION
PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED * DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING * USE DIMENSIONS ONLY
PIEDMONT'S NATURAL GAS FACILITY DRAWINGS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL (OM -1095) * DRAWING IS CURRENT ONLY THROUGH THE LATEST REVISED DATE * TO INSURE THERE IS NO RISK OF INAPPROPRIATE
DESCRIPTION
750
APPROVALS
750
Piedmont
Natural Gas
COPYRIGHT 2015 PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CORP.
CORP. OFFICE 4720 PIEDMONT ROW DRIVE
CHARLOTTE, NC 28210
M
)E
oA TE
"IT"
N/A
z
r
z4" RCP
30LF ®1.66%�
°ATE
IN/ALS
p
M
D
10126/2018
N/A
PRINCIPAL
ENGINEER
ITIALS
W
O
_J
Z
745
745
W
742
742
-0+10
+00
INV OUT: 743.00
STATION
PIPE 3 PROFILE
HORZ. SCALE 1"= 10'
VERT. SCALE 1"= 2'
TS TEMPORARY SEEDING CROSSING 2 PROFILE - PIPE 3
DUST CONTROL
REVISION(S) DESCRIPTION
PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED * DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING * USE DIMENSIONS ONLY
PIEDMONT'S NATURAL GAS FACILITY DRAWINGS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL (OM -1095) * DRAWING IS CURRENT ONLY THROUGH THE LATEST REVISED DATE * TO INSURE THERE IS NO RISK OF INAPPROPRIATE
DESCRIPTION
APPROVALS
Piedmont
Natural Gas
COPYRIGHT 2015 PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CORP.
CORP. OFFICE 4720 PIEDMONT ROW DRIVE
CHARLOTTE, NC 28210
PROPOSED
GRADE
)E
oA TE
"IT"
N/A
INV IN: ]43.50
NUMBER
z4" RCP
30LF ®1.66%�
°ATE
IN/ALS
EXISTING
GRADE
BY
TS TEMPORARY SEEDING CROSSING 2 PROFILE - PIPE 3
DUST CONTROL
REVISION(S) DESCRIPTION
PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED * DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING * USE DIMENSIONS ONLY
PIEDMONT'S NATURAL GAS FACILITY DRAWINGS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL (OM -1095) * DRAWING IS CURRENT ONLY THROUGH THE LATEST REVISED DATE * TO INSURE THERE IS NO RISK OF INAPPROPRIATE
DESCRIPTION
APPROVALS
Piedmont
Natural Gas
COPYRIGHT 2015 PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CORP.
CORP. OFFICE 4720 PIEDMONT ROW DRIVE
CHARLOTTE, NC 28210
MILL CREEK STREAM RESTORATION
CROSSING 2
WINSTON SALEM NC
I
Resource Center City, State
)E
oA TE
"IT"
N/A
REGIONAL
ENGINEER
ENGINEER
NUMBER
NUMBER 1180614
°ATE
IN/ALS
RMGR TECH EC&STD
BY
D
10126/2018
N/A
PRINCIPAL
ENGINEER
ITIALS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
REF. DWG(S)
SHEET(S) 03 DWG SCALE AS SHOWN
DWG DATE 2018-10-26 SUPERSEDED
DRAWING NUMBER REVISION
PNG-C-200-103 -
DISCIPLINE I RESOURCE CENTER I LINE NUMBER

Practice Standards and Specifications
6.14
OM Defi nitlon Application of a protective blanket of straw or other plant residue, gravel, or
synthetic material to the soil surface.
Purpose To protect the soil surface from the forces of raindrop impact and overland
flow. Mulch fosters the growth of vegetation, reduces evaporation, insulates
the soil, and suppresses weed growth. Mulch is frequency used to accent
landscape plantings.
Conditions Where Mulch temporary or permanent seedings immediately. Areas that cannot
PracticeApplies be seeded because of the season should be mulched to provide temporary
protection of the soil surface. Use an organic mulch in this case (but not wood
fiber), and seed the area as soon as possible. Mulch around plantings of trees,
shrubs, or ground covers to stabilize the soil between plants.
Planning A surface mulch is the most effective, practical means of controlling mooff
Considerations and erosion on disturbed land prior to vegetation establishment. Mulch
reduces soil moisture loss by evaporation, prevents crusting and sealing of the
soil surface, moderates soil temperatures, provides a suitable microclimate for
seed germination, and may increase the infiltration rate of the soil.
Organic mulches such as straw, wood chips, and shredded bark have been
found to be the moat effective. Do not use materials which may be sources
of competing weed and grass seeds. Decomposition of some wood products
can tie up significant amounts of soil nitrogen, making it necessary to modify
fertilization rates, or add fertilizer with the mulch (Table 6.14a).
A variety of mats and fabrics have been developed in recent years for use a t
mulch, particularly in critical areas such as waterways and channels. Various
types of netting materials are also available to anchor organic mulches.
Chemical soil stabilizers or soil binders, when used alone, are less effective
than other types of mulches. These products are primarily useful for tacking
wood fiber mulches.
The choice of materials for mulching should be based on soil conditions,
season, type of vegemtion, and size of the area. A properly applied and tacked
mulch is always beneficial. It is especially important when conditions for
germination are not optimum, such as midsummer and early winter, and on
difficult areas such as cut slopes and slopes with southern exposures.
ORGANIC MULCHES
Straw is the mulch most commonly used in conjunction with seeding. The
straw should come from wheat or oats ("small grains'), and may be spread by
hand or with a mulch blower. Straw may be lost to wind, and must be tacked
down.
Wood chips are suitable for areas that will not be closely mowed, and around
ornamental plantings. Chips do not require tacking. Because they decompose
slowly, they must be treated with 12 pounds of nitrogen per ton to prevent
u
Table 6.14a
Chemical Stabittzerw
Aquatain follow Not beneficial to plant growth.
Aerospray manufacturer's
Cursed AK specifications
Petroset SB
Terra Tack
Crust 500
Genaqua 743
M-145
'Refer to Practice No. 6.30, Grass Lined Channels.
'Use of trade names does not imply endorsement of product.
Practice Standards and Specifications
6.10
TEMPORARYa
TS
Definition Planting rapid -growing annual grasses, small grains, or legumes to provide
initial, temporary cover for erosion control on disturbed areas.
Purpose To temporarily stabilize denuded areas that will not be brought to final grade
for a period of more than 21 calendar days.
Temporary seeding controls ronoff and erosion until permanent vegetation or
other erosion control measures can be established. In addition, it provides
residue for soil protection and seedbed preparation, and reduces problems of
mud and dust production from bare soil surfaces during construction.
Conditions Where On any cleared, unvegetatet, or sparsely vegetated soil surface where
Practice Applies
vegetative
r" ns for year.ins, tempo,�road banks,
m ee
and topsoil stockpiles.
Planning Annual plants, which sprout and grow rapidly and survive for only one season,
Considerations are suitable for establishing initial or temporary vegetative cover. Temporary
seeding preserves the integrity of earthen sediment control structures such
as dikes, diversions, and the banks of dams and sediment basins. It can also
reduce the amountofmaintenance associated with these devices. Forexample,
the frequency of sediment basin cleanouts will be reduced if watershed areas,
outside the active construction zone, are stabilized.
Proper seedbed preparation, selection ofappropriate species, =time ofgunlity
seed are as important in this Practice as in Practice 6.11, Permanent Seeding.
Failure to follow established guidelines and recommendations carefully may
result in an inadequate or short-lived stand of vegetation that will not control
erosion
Temporary seeding provides protection for an more than 1 year, timing which
time permanent stabilization should be initiated.
Specifications Complete grading before preparing seedbeds, and install all necessary erosion
control practices such as, dikes, waterways, and basins. Minimize steep slopes
because they make seedbed preparation difficult and increase the erosion
hazard If soils become compacted during grading, loosen them to a depth of
6-8 inches using a ripper, harrow, or chisel plow.
SEEDBED PREPARATION
Good seedbed preparation is essential to successful plant establishment. A
good seedbed is well -pulverized, loose, and uniform Where hydroseeding
methods are used, the surface may be left with a mom irregular surface of
large clods and stones.
Liming—Apply limeaccordingtosoiltestreeommendatiuns. IfthepH (acidity)
of the soil is not known, an application of ground agricultural limestone at the
6.14.1 6.14.2 Rev. 6106 6.10.1
O MULCHINGTEMPORARY SEEDING
2
SCALE: N.T.S. SCALE: N.T.S.
u
rate of 1 to 1 1/2 tons/acre on coarse-textured soils and 2-3 tons/wm on fine -
textured soils is usually sufficient. Apply limestone uniformly and incorporate
into the top 4-6 inches of soil. Soils with a pH of 6 or higher aced not be
limed.
Ferdlizer—Base application rates on soil tests. When these are not possible,
apply a l O-10-10 grade fertilizer at 700-1,OD01btwm. Both fertilizer and lime
should be incorporated into the top 4-6 inches of soil. If a hydraulic seeder is
used, do not mix seed and fertilizer more than 30 minutes before application.
Surface roughening—If recent tillage operations have resulted in a loose
surface, additional roughening may not be required, except to break up large
clods. If rainfall causes the surface to become sealed or crusted, loosen it
just prior to seeding by disking, raking, harrowing, or other suitable methods.
Groove or fiumw slopes steeper than 3:1 on the conmur before seeding
(Practice 6.03, Surface Roughening).
PLANT SELECTION
Select an appropriate species or species mixture from Table 6.10a for seeding
in late winter and early spring, Table 6.10b for summer, and Table 6.10c for
fall.
In the Mountains, December and January seedings have poor chances of
success. When it is necessary to plant at these times, use recommendations
for fall and a securely tacked mulch.
SEEDING
Evenly apply seed using a cyclone seeder (broadcast), drill, cultipacker seeder,
or hydroseeder. Use seeding rates given in Tables 6.10a -6.10c. Broadcast
seeding and hydroseeding are appropriate for steep slopes where equipment
cannot be driven. Hand broadcasting is not recommended because of the
difficulty in achieving a uniform distribution.
Small grains should be planted no more than 1 inch deep, and grosses and
legumes no more than 1/2 inch. Broadcast seed must be covered by raking
or chain dragging, and then lightly fumed with a roller or cultipacker.
Hydroseeded mixtures should include a wood fiber (cellulose) mulch.
MULCHING
The use of an appropriate mulch will help ensure establishment under normal
conditions, and is essential to seeding success under harsh site conditions
(Practice 6.14, Mulching). Harsh site conditions include:
• seeding in fall for winter cover (wood fiber mulches are not considered
adequate for this use),
• slopes steeper than 3:1,
• excessively hot or dry weather,
• adverse soils (shallow, rocky, or high in clay or sand), and
• areas receiving concentrated flow.
If the area to be mulched is subject to concentrated waterflow, as in channels,
anchor mulch with netting (Practice 6.14, Mulching).
6.10.2 Practice Standards mrd Spechcaticn
Table 6.10b
Temporary Seeding
Recommendationsfor
Summer
PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED * DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING * USE DIMENSIONS ONLY
PIEDMONT'S NATURAL GAS FACILITY DRAWINGS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL (OM -1095) * DRAWING IS CURRENT ONLY THROUGH THE LATEST REVISED DATE * TO INSURE THERE IS NO RISK OF INAPPROPRIATE
DISCLOSER ALL PREVIOUS PAPER COPIES OF THIS DRAWING MUST BE DESTROYED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RECORDS & INFO. MANAGEMENT RIM POLICY 1001
DATE REVISION(S) DESCRIPTION BY CHK APPD DESCRIPTION APPROVALS
AREA CODEE "'r"a REGIONAL MILL CREEK STREAM RESTORATION
ACCOUNT NUMBER p N/AENGINEER Piedmont
PROJECT NUMBER 1180614 DAE
NIAEROSION CONTROL DETAILS
DRAWING BY `. REC&STD I Natural Gas
WINSTON SALEM NC
STATION ID pn a uirw PRINCIPAL COPYRIGHT 2015 PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CORP.
CHECKER INITIALS 10/26/2018 N/A ENGINEER CORP. OFCICE 4720 HARLOTTE, NC 28210
DRIVE Resource Center City, State
Seeding mixture
spaeYa Rate (Ibtacre)
German millet 40
In the Piedmont and Mountains, a small -stemmed Sudarlg ass may be
substituted at a rate of 50 Iblacre.
Seeding dates
Mountains—May 15 -Aug. 15
Piedmont—May 1 -Aug. 15
Coastal Plain—Apr. 15 -Aug. 15
Soil amendments,
Follow recommendations of soil tests or apply 2.1100 Ibtacre ground
agricultural limestone and 750lb/acre 10-10-10 feralaer.
Mulch
%PIy4,000 Warm, straw. Anchorstrawbylackirlg with asphalt, nening,
mulch anchoring tool. Adisk with blades set neatly straight can be
used as a mulch anchoring tool.
Maintenance
Referuiw 0 growth is not fully adequate. Reseed, referalize and mulch
immediately following erosion or other damage.
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
REF. DWG(S)
SHEET(S) 04 1 DWG SCALE AS SHOWN
DWG DATE 2018-10-26 SUPERSEDED
DRAWING NUMBER REVISION
PNG-C-200-104 -
DISCIPLINE IRESOURCE CENTER /LINE NUMBER amu
mufcnfng macenafs ana Application traces
Material
Rate Per Acre Quality
Notes
Organic Mulches
Straw
1-2 tons
Dry, unchopped,
Should come from wheat or oats;
unweathered; avoid
spread by hand or machine; must
weeds.
be tacked down.
Wood chips
5-6 tons
Air dry
Treat with 12 Itis nitrogen/ton. Apply
with mulch blower, chip handler, or
by hand. Not for use in fine turf.
Wood fiber
0.5-1 tons
Also referred to as wood cellulose.
May be hydroseeded. Do not use in
hot, dry weather.
Bark
35 cubic yards Air dry, shredded or
Appy with mulch blower, chip
hammer -milled, or chips.
handler, or by hand. Do not use
asphalt tack.
Com stalks
4-6 tons
Cut or shredded in 4-6
Appy with mulch blower or by hand.
in. lengths.
Not for use in fine turf.
Sericea
1-3 tons
Green or dry; should
lespedeza
contain mature seed.
seed -bearing
stems
Nets and Mats'
Jute net
Cover area
Heavy, uniform; woven
Withstands waterflow. Best when
of single jute yam.
used with organic mulch.
Fiberglass net
Cover area
Withstands waterflow. Best when
used with organic mulch.
Excelsior
Cover area
Withstands waternow.
(wood fiber)
mat
Fiberglass roving
0.5.1 tons
Continuous fibers of
Appy with a compressed air ejector.
drawn glass bound
Tack with emulsified asphalt at a
together with a non-toxic
rate of 25.35 gal/1,000 sq ft.
agent.
Chemical Stabittzerw
Aquatain follow Not beneficial to plant growth.
Aerospray manufacturer's
Cursed AK specifications
Petroset SB
Terra Tack
Crust 500
Genaqua 743
M-145
'Refer to Practice No. 6.30, Grass Lined Channels.
'Use of trade names does not imply endorsement of product.
Practice Standards and Specifications
6.10
TEMPORARYa
TS
Definition Planting rapid -growing annual grasses, small grains, or legumes to provide
initial, temporary cover for erosion control on disturbed areas.
Purpose To temporarily stabilize denuded areas that will not be brought to final grade
for a period of more than 21 calendar days.
Temporary seeding controls ronoff and erosion until permanent vegetation or
other erosion control measures can be established. In addition, it provides
residue for soil protection and seedbed preparation, and reduces problems of
mud and dust production from bare soil surfaces during construction.
Conditions Where On any cleared, unvegetatet, or sparsely vegetated soil surface where
Practice Applies
vegetative
r" ns for year.ins, tempo,�road banks,
m ee
and topsoil stockpiles.
Planning Annual plants, which sprout and grow rapidly and survive for only one season,
Considerations are suitable for establishing initial or temporary vegetative cover. Temporary
seeding preserves the integrity of earthen sediment control structures such
as dikes, diversions, and the banks of dams and sediment basins. It can also
reduce the amountofmaintenance associated with these devices. Forexample,
the frequency of sediment basin cleanouts will be reduced if watershed areas,
outside the active construction zone, are stabilized.
Proper seedbed preparation, selection ofappropriate species, =time ofgunlity
seed are as important in this Practice as in Practice 6.11, Permanent Seeding.
Failure to follow established guidelines and recommendations carefully may
result in an inadequate or short-lived stand of vegetation that will not control
erosion
Temporary seeding provides protection for an more than 1 year, timing which
time permanent stabilization should be initiated.
Specifications Complete grading before preparing seedbeds, and install all necessary erosion
control practices such as, dikes, waterways, and basins. Minimize steep slopes
because they make seedbed preparation difficult and increase the erosion
hazard If soils become compacted during grading, loosen them to a depth of
6-8 inches using a ripper, harrow, or chisel plow.
SEEDBED PREPARATION
Good seedbed preparation is essential to successful plant establishment. A
good seedbed is well -pulverized, loose, and uniform Where hydroseeding
methods are used, the surface may be left with a mom irregular surface of
large clods and stones.
Liming—Apply limeaccordingtosoiltestreeommendatiuns. IfthepH (acidity)
of the soil is not known, an application of ground agricultural limestone at the
6.14.1 6.14.2 Rev. 6106 6.10.1
O MULCHINGTEMPORARY SEEDING
2
SCALE: N.T.S. SCALE: N.T.S.
u
rate of 1 to 1 1/2 tons/acre on coarse-textured soils and 2-3 tons/wm on fine -
textured soils is usually sufficient. Apply limestone uniformly and incorporate
into the top 4-6 inches of soil. Soils with a pH of 6 or higher aced not be
limed.
Ferdlizer—Base application rates on soil tests. When these are not possible,
apply a l O-10-10 grade fertilizer at 700-1,OD01btwm. Both fertilizer and lime
should be incorporated into the top 4-6 inches of soil. If a hydraulic seeder is
used, do not mix seed and fertilizer more than 30 minutes before application.
Surface roughening—If recent tillage operations have resulted in a loose
surface, additional roughening may not be required, except to break up large
clods. If rainfall causes the surface to become sealed or crusted, loosen it
just prior to seeding by disking, raking, harrowing, or other suitable methods.
Groove or fiumw slopes steeper than 3:1 on the conmur before seeding
(Practice 6.03, Surface Roughening).
PLANT SELECTION
Select an appropriate species or species mixture from Table 6.10a for seeding
in late winter and early spring, Table 6.10b for summer, and Table 6.10c for
fall.
In the Mountains, December and January seedings have poor chances of
success. When it is necessary to plant at these times, use recommendations
for fall and a securely tacked mulch.
SEEDING
Evenly apply seed using a cyclone seeder (broadcast), drill, cultipacker seeder,
or hydroseeder. Use seeding rates given in Tables 6.10a -6.10c. Broadcast
seeding and hydroseeding are appropriate for steep slopes where equipment
cannot be driven. Hand broadcasting is not recommended because of the
difficulty in achieving a uniform distribution.
Small grains should be planted no more than 1 inch deep, and grosses and
legumes no more than 1/2 inch. Broadcast seed must be covered by raking
or chain dragging, and then lightly fumed with a roller or cultipacker.
Hydroseeded mixtures should include a wood fiber (cellulose) mulch.
MULCHING
The use of an appropriate mulch will help ensure establishment under normal
conditions, and is essential to seeding success under harsh site conditions
(Practice 6.14, Mulching). Harsh site conditions include:
• seeding in fall for winter cover (wood fiber mulches are not considered
adequate for this use),
• slopes steeper than 3:1,
• excessively hot or dry weather,
• adverse soils (shallow, rocky, or high in clay or sand), and
• areas receiving concentrated flow.
If the area to be mulched is subject to concentrated waterflow, as in channels,
anchor mulch with netting (Practice 6.14, Mulching).
6.10.2 Practice Standards mrd Spechcaticn
Table 6.10b
Temporary Seeding
Recommendationsfor
Summer
PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED * DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING * USE DIMENSIONS ONLY
PIEDMONT'S NATURAL GAS FACILITY DRAWINGS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL (OM -1095) * DRAWING IS CURRENT ONLY THROUGH THE LATEST REVISED DATE * TO INSURE THERE IS NO RISK OF INAPPROPRIATE
DISCLOSER ALL PREVIOUS PAPER COPIES OF THIS DRAWING MUST BE DESTROYED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RECORDS & INFO. MANAGEMENT RIM POLICY 1001
DATE REVISION(S) DESCRIPTION BY CHK APPD DESCRIPTION APPROVALS
AREA CODEE "'r"a REGIONAL MILL CREEK STREAM RESTORATION
ACCOUNT NUMBER p N/AENGINEER Piedmont
PROJECT NUMBER 1180614 DAE
NIAEROSION CONTROL DETAILS
DRAWING BY `. REC&STD I Natural Gas
WINSTON SALEM NC
STATION ID pn a uirw PRINCIPAL COPYRIGHT 2015 PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CORP.
CHECKER INITIALS 10/26/2018 N/A ENGINEER CORP. OFCICE 4720 HARLOTTE, NC 28210
DRIVE Resource Center City, State
Seeding mixture
spaeYa Rate (Ibtacre)
German millet 40
In the Piedmont and Mountains, a small -stemmed Sudarlg ass may be
substituted at a rate of 50 Iblacre.
Seeding dates
Mountains—May 15 -Aug. 15
Piedmont—May 1 -Aug. 15
Coastal Plain—Apr. 15 -Aug. 15
Soil amendments,
Follow recommendations of soil tests or apply 2.1100 Ibtacre ground
agricultural limestone and 750lb/acre 10-10-10 feralaer.
Mulch
%PIy4,000 Warm, straw. Anchorstrawbylackirlg with asphalt, nening,
mulch anchoring tool. Adisk with blades set neatly straight can be
used as a mulch anchoring tool.
Maintenance
Referuiw 0 growth is not fully adequate. Reseed, referalize and mulch
immediately following erosion or other damage.
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
REF. DWG(S)
SHEET(S) 04 1 DWG SCALE AS SHOWN
DWG DATE 2018-10-26 SUPERSEDED
DRAWING NUMBER REVISION
PNG-C-200-104 -
DISCIPLINE IRESOURCE CENTER /LINE NUMBER amu

M
OUTLET STABILIZATION SUMMARY
Pipe Outlet to Flat Area—
OUTLET
No Well- efined Channel
O PIPE
d
ado A _
o
fY
0
(IN)
Plan
(FPS) LA (FT) W (FT)
L
�i�6ivlrwl
*Filler
ID
. . in, AA
----- blanket
Nn_tnc
o -p
GOT? o°S
1. La is the length of the riprap
Pipe Outlet to Well-defined
apron.
Channel
2. d=1.5 times the maximum
8
stone diameter but not less
than 6".
18
3. In a well-defined channel ex-
12.01
tend the apron upthe channel
A
banks to an elevation of 6"
---maximum
tailwstar
depth ortothe top of the bank,
6
whichever is less.
24
4. A filter blanket or filter fabric
2.75 19 6
should be installed between
Plan
the riprap and soil foundation.
L e
AND/OR HARDWARE CLOTH AS NEEDED
FLOW DIRECTION
AdTlim
;,"s
TO ALLOW RUNOFF TO SLOWLY DEWATER
GRADE
Section AAA IIP
THROUGH THE DEVICE BETWEEN RAIN
Filter
MAXIMUM 2 FEET APART WIRE FENCE
blanket
8
_777,77"7
"
Re.. ... R4mP°°as P,a«s°^(maaMd ham Ve swCC/.
6AIA
ase 61,
NOTE
SEE PLANS FOR LIMITS OF OUTLET STABILIZATION FOR PIPES 1, 2
AND 4.
E
OUTLET STABILIZATION STRUCTURE
SCALE: N.T.S.
OUTLET STABILIZATION SUMMARY
I CHK JAPPD
OUTLET
PIPE DIA.
O PIPE
CAPAC VEL.
o
fY
PROTECTION
(IN)
CAPACIT
(FPS) LA (FT) W (FT)
D50 (IN)
ID
A REPAIR OF SILT FENCE FAILURES.
(CFS)
o -p
GOT? o°S
PIPE 1
24
54.22
17.93
8
PIPE 2
18
20.43
12.01
6
PIPE 4
24
33.89
11.2
6
PIPE 3(OPT B)
24
8.03
2.75 19 6
6
NOTE
SEE PLANS FOR LIMITS OF OUTLET STABILIZATION FOR PIPES 1, 2
AND 4.
E
OUTLET STABILIZATION STRUCTURE
SCALE: N.T.S.
SEDIMENT FENCE (SILT FENC
SCALE: N.T.S.
PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED * DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING * USE DIMENSIONS ONLY
PIEDMONT'S NATURAL GAS FACILITY DRAWINGS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL (OM -1095) * DRAWING IS CURRENT ONLY THROUGH THE LATEST REVISED DATE * TO INSURE THERE IS NO RISK OF INAPPROPRIATE
DATE REVISION(S) DESCRIPTION
BY
I CHK JAPPD
DESCRIPTION
APPROVALS
FILTER OF 1 INCH DIAMETER
# 57 WASHED STONE ° °
o
fY
INSTALLATION NOTES:
—USE SILT FENCE OUTLETS ONLY WHEN
a
o �o a° o
f
DRAINAGE AREA DOES NOT EXCEED 1/4
ACRE AND THERE IS A LOW AREA. USE
SILT FENCE FABRIC TO OVERLAPAS
° °
A REPAIR OF SILT FENCE FAILURES.
HARDWARE CLOTH BY 12 INCHES °�
oc
o -p
GOT? o°S
STEEL FENCE POST
WIRE FENCESILT FENCE FABRIC
HARDWARE CLOTH'S STEEL FENCE POST
DAE
ON HARE FENCE
ON WIRE FENCE
MAINTENANCE NOTES:
SILT FENCE FABRIC
PLAN VIEW
—REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF SILT
ACCUMULATIONS WHEN THE DEPTH
FILTER OF 1 INCH DIAMETER
r_uT n
57 WASHED STONE
ono
10126/2018
THE #57 STONE.�u _ V
SLOPE OF 2H:1V
—REPLACE OR CLEAN /57 STONE
12"
CHECKER INITIALS
AND/OR HARDWARE CLOTH AS NEEDED
FLOW DIRECTION
TO ALLOW RUNOFF TO SLOWLY DEWATER
GRADE
STEEL FENCE POST SET
THROUGH THE DEVICE BETWEEN RAIN
- I
HARDWARE _y — HARDWARE CLOTH
MAXIMUM 2 FEET APART WIRE FENCE
EVENTS.
8
_777,77"7
"
II
SIDE VIEW
SILT FENCE
FABRIC
R
R P
12
12
INCH
INCH
GRADE
�i.-..^•AIL
;u; I )ul.
L NOTE:
BURY WIRE FENCE, HARDWARE CLOTH,
FRONT VIEW
AND SILT FENCE FABRIC 8" INTO THE
TRENCH
STANDARD SILT FENCE
OUTLET
ESA GUIDANCE
NN 11
WKE
ENERGY d
.o
nmw
IICIFB
SEDIMENT FENCE (SILT FENC
SCALE: N.T.S.
PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED * DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING * USE DIMENSIONS ONLY
PIEDMONT'S NATURAL GAS FACILITY DRAWINGS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL (OM -1095) * DRAWING IS CURRENT ONLY THROUGH THE LATEST REVISED DATE * TO INSURE THERE IS NO RISK OF INAPPROPRIATE
DATE REVISION(S) DESCRIPTION
BY
I CHK JAPPD
DESCRIPTION
APPROVALS
Piedmont
�'
Natural Gas
COPYRIGHT 2015 PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CORP.
CORP. OF CIHARLOTTE, NCCE 4720 28210 DRIVE
AREA CODE
e"
N'T"
WA
REGIONAL
ENGINEER
ACCOUNT NUMBER
PROJECT NUMBER 1180614
DAE
INTA`a
RMGR TECH
EC&STD
DRAWING BY
STATION ID
ono
10126/2018
NiTw
N/A La
PRINCIPAL
ENGINEER
CHECKER INITIALS
Practice Standards and Specifications
6.84
DUST CONTROL
Definition The cou6ol ofdust resarieg Som loos-d;s^w+°garnhees.
Purpose To prevevt,mr am ar movement cram( rrom m,nnum roil,erla<ea mat
may oemo of,iW derange, heslW lessors, evil trafe safety problems.
Conditions Where our --lin root« and ane, disturbed areas .*., to star dml
Practice Applies—_.`US. and dust blowing where off -aim damage may ocan if dmt l. va
Plannin Coestmcfion aa,nbes flut di m 1, will cam be .. ipificaet souu of ,&
Considerations pollumn. large euaobues of dost can be genemto L es iefy in "heavy"
constmcfion s,,tiges such m land g,,A, for road constmoU. aM
wmmemml, irMos(ria, or subdtws�on developmwt.
In planing for dost control, it is important to bWW, consuucfion opmmom
so that the least tare is d'uhnbod at one time.
Leave und'ulmi,ed buffer areas behvem g,eaed areas wherever poasibls
The greatest dust problems occur when We probability of seimsll emn- l.
I- Therefore, do not expose large areas fsoil, asp Wty donna drought
cond,kom
Install temporary or pennment surface stebdnsfi mesemes immediaely
ager—plating lend grading.
Design Criteria No r rural dome pro don I, given for dml cost ol. Sm Con—tion
Specifications below for be most cemmon im, control melnod,.
Construction Vegete&e carer—Fm diiev bM ere- our wbimt to trift resetefion
.S ecifications smpmribddes ;wnnaWe).most pmfi sl method of dost control (e*rencaa: Su7ce
P
MOO (inrladivg gree/ mWrh)—When properly ap H4 mulch oil a
fast. effati meansofcommllm, dost
Spray -our edEeaire—Examples ofspm,-on a I.i—foruse on mineral soil.
ere presomed in Table 6.84a
Table 6.64a Water type f Apply
Spray -on Adhesive for Dust Dilution Noule GalbnalAcra
Control on Mineral Soil Anionic asphalt
emulsion 7:1 Coarse Spray 1,200
Latex emulsion 12.5:1 Fine Spray 235
Resin in water 4:1 Fine SP. 300
DUST CONTROL
J SCALE: N.T.S.
MILL CREEK STREAM RESTORATION
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
WINSTON SALEM, NC
Resource Center City, State
684.1
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
REF. DWG(S)
SHEET(S) 05 1 DWG SCALE AS SHOWN
DWG DATE 2018-10-26 SUPERSEDED
DRAWING NUMBER REVISION
PNG-C-200-105 -
DISCIPLINE I RESOURCE CENTER I LINE NUMBER

Dmax
STA CROSS SECTION #3+ ELEV. =1034.64 \
\ y \ TYPICAL POOL (Dmax = 10') `
ROCK )-HOOK
FILL AND GRADE TO STA 3+40
TOEWOOD = 40LF .
BANKFULL ELEV. - 745.00' \ ELEV. = 737.84
MATCH EXISTING
\ BANKFULL FORD GRADE \ tlL \
LOW FLOW \'
CHANNEL
\\
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION STA 0+00
PROPOSED MILL CREEK THALWEG
POOL Dmax \\
STA 3+70 ' - �A�sS° `SAN �Ae
ELEV. 736.06 v 4""'AA\\�A\ ,
/ RIFFLES
STA 3+95 \\\\\\\
�j ELEV. - 737.77
_ _ \ BEDROCK IIO
FOUND
I
CROSS SECTION #1
TYPICAL J -HOOK INVERT
—0 50 0+00
750-
S
ELEV
74
74
�L
0 73
73
72
CROSS SECTION #2
TYPICAL POOL (Dmax = 8.5')
0+.50 1+00 1+.50
CROSS SECTION #3
TYPICAL POOL (Dmax = 10')
2+00 2+.50 3+0 3+.50
CROSS SECTION #4
TYPICAL RIFFLE
+00 4+.50 5+00
5+.50
6+00
750
FS w-�� ��V5+46
BANKFULL
p \ i\ \\STA STA
CROSS SECTION #4 \
TYPICAL RIFFLE
-
I
ROCK/LOG J -HOOK - -mss �\ - 46
FILL AND GRADE TO I
TA = +90
\ \
✓
` -
STA 2+50
ELEV. = 737.97 \ \ BANKFULL ELEV. = 744.50' I
LEV = 744.8C
-
I /
RIFFLE , \ � \ �
��� �
STA 1+90
SITE PLAN
ELEV. = 738.05' �" \
�
POOL Dmax
POOL Dmax
-� \
SCALE: 1" = 40'
CROSS SECTION #1
PROPOSED
THALWEG
STA 0+85 /
\� END CONSTRUCTION STA
CROSS SECTION #2
J -HOOK INVERT
J -HOOK
ELEV. = 734.95 \ /TYPICAL
I
STA 1+65
ELEV. = 736.34
\PROPOSED MILL CREEK THALTYPICAL
I
POOL (Dmax = 8.5')ROCKILOG \
GRADE/
EXISTING
STA0+25
SCOURLOG
�
ELEV. = 738.27
X�- STA1+25
TOEWOOD = 130LF
0 20' 40' 80' 120'
ELEV. = 737.63'\jSCALE:
\\
1" = 40'
CROSS SECTION #1
TYPICAL J -HOOK INVERT
—0 50 0+00
750-
S
ELEV
74
74
�L
0 73
73
72
CROSS SECTION #2
TYPICAL POOL (Dmax = 8.5')
0+.50 1+00 1+.50
CROSS SECTION #3
TYPICAL POOL (Dmax = 10')
2+00 2+.50 3+0 3+.50
CROSS SECTION #4
TYPICAL RIFFLE
+00 4+.50 5+00
5+.50
6+00
750
DATE I REVISION(S) DESCRIPTION
Station
45
40 E
0
n/
W
35 W
30
725
6+00
PY���-�(HORZ
L .); 1" =4' (VERT.)
0 20' 40' 80' 120
SCALE: 1" = 40'
0 2' 4' 8' 12'
SCALE: 1"= 4'
PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED * DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING * USE DIMENSIONS ONLY
PIEDMONT'S NATURAL GAS FACILITY DRAWINGS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL (OM -1095) * DRAWING IS CURRENT ONLY THROUGH THE LATEST REVISED DATE * TO INSURE THERE IS NO RISK OF INAPPROPRIATE
DESCRIPTION APPROVALS
)E N/A
REGIONAL Piedmont
NUMBER ENGINEER
NUMBER 1180614DAE MALS
BY REC&STD Natural Gas
COPYRIGHT 2015 PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CORP.
D 10126/2018 N/A ENGINEER CORP. PRINC PAL OFFICE 4720 PIEDMONT ROW DRIVE
ITIALS CHARLOTTE, NC 28210
NOTE:
1. CONTRACTOR TO CONSULT THE DESIGNER OR
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE DURING THE ENTIRETY
OF THE PROJECT.
2. BEDROCK WAS FOUND DURING SURVEY AND MAY
REQUIRE FIELD ENGINEERING AS CONTRACTOR
RE -SHAPES STREAM CHANNEL.
3. UTILIZE LOCAL/NATIVE MATERIAL FOR IN STREAM
STRUCTURES WHEN POSSIBLE.
4. USE EXTREME CAUTION DURING CONSTRUCTION
NEAR UTILITIES.
MILL CREEK STREAM RESTORATION
STREAM RESTORATION
WINSTON SALEM, NC
Resource Center City, State
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
REF. DWG(S)
SHEET(S) 06 1 DWG SCALE AS SHOWN
DWG DATE 2018-10-26 SUPERSEDED
DRAWING NUMBER REVISION
PNG-C-200-106 -
DISCIPLINE I RESOURCE CENTER I LINE NUMBER
BANKFULL
A = 0+0
TA = +90
STA = 3+95
S A = 5d 44
= 745.0
LEV = 744.8C
ELE = 74C52
ELEV = 74 .32
PROPOSED
THALWEG
EXISTING
STA = 5+50
GRADE/
EXISTING
\
I \
FORD
\
�
N
h
+ r
+
ii IO
+
N
+
>
¢ >
¢
II II
"� m
II
M n m II
II O m
LJ
N
!n
W
10
J
O M
< r'1 M
ifl
+ r
N N J J
r
II II
w
w �
II II II
II N W �
II II
W
>
¢ >
DATE I REVISION(S) DESCRIPTION
Station
45
40 E
0
n/
W
35 W
30
725
6+00
PY���-�(HORZ
L .); 1" =4' (VERT.)
0 20' 40' 80' 120
SCALE: 1" = 40'
0 2' 4' 8' 12'
SCALE: 1"= 4'
PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED * DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING * USE DIMENSIONS ONLY
PIEDMONT'S NATURAL GAS FACILITY DRAWINGS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL (OM -1095) * DRAWING IS CURRENT ONLY THROUGH THE LATEST REVISED DATE * TO INSURE THERE IS NO RISK OF INAPPROPRIATE
DESCRIPTION APPROVALS
)E N/A
REGIONAL Piedmont
NUMBER ENGINEER
NUMBER 1180614DAE MALS
BY REC&STD Natural Gas
COPYRIGHT 2015 PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CORP.
D 10126/2018 N/A ENGINEER CORP. PRINC PAL OFFICE 4720 PIEDMONT ROW DRIVE
ITIALS CHARLOTTE, NC 28210
NOTE:
1. CONTRACTOR TO CONSULT THE DESIGNER OR
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE DURING THE ENTIRETY
OF THE PROJECT.
2. BEDROCK WAS FOUND DURING SURVEY AND MAY
REQUIRE FIELD ENGINEERING AS CONTRACTOR
RE -SHAPES STREAM CHANNEL.
3. UTILIZE LOCAL/NATIVE MATERIAL FOR IN STREAM
STRUCTURES WHEN POSSIBLE.
4. USE EXTREME CAUTION DURING CONSTRUCTION
NEAR UTILITIES.
MILL CREEK STREAM RESTORATION
STREAM RESTORATION
WINSTON SALEM, NC
Resource Center City, State
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
REF. DWG(S)
SHEET(S) 06 1 DWG SCALE AS SHOWN
DWG DATE 2018-10-26 SUPERSEDED
DRAWING NUMBER REVISION
PNG-C-200-106 -
DISCIPLINE I RESOURCE CENTER I LINE NUMBER

DATE
in
^� CROSS SECTIONS
SCALE: 1" = 20' (HORZ.); 1" = 10' (VERT.)
0 20' 40' 80' 120'
SCALE: 1" = 40'
0 5' 10' 20' 30'
SCALE: 1" = 10'
PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED * DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING * USE DIMENSIONS ONLY
PIEDMONT'S NATURAL GAS FACILITY DRAWINGS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL (OM -1095) * DRAWING IS CURRENT ONLY THROUGH THE LATEST REVISED DATE * TO INSURE THERE IS NO RISK OF INAPPROPRIATE
DISCLOSER ALL PREVIOUS PAPER COPIES OF THIS DRAWING MUST BE DESTROYED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RECORDS & INFO. MANAGEMENT RIM POLICY 1001
REVISION(S) DESCRIPTION BY CHK APPD DESCRIPTION APPROVALS
AREA CODE— INITIALS
REGIONAL MILL CREEK STREAM RESTORATION
ACCOUNT NUMBER WAS ENGINEER Piedmont MGR TECH CROSS SECTIONS
PROJECT NUMBER 1180614 DAE MALS REC&STD Natural Gas WINSTON SALEM NC
DRAWING BY
STATION ID °A a INITIALS PRINCIPAL COPYRIGHT 2015 PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CORP.
CHECKER INITIALS 10126/2018 N/A Lg ENGINEER CORP. OFCIHARLOTTE, NCCE 4720 28210
DRIVE Resource Center City, State
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
REF. DWG(S)
SHEET(S) 07 1 DWG SCALE AS SHOWN
DWG DATE 2018-10-26 SUPERSEDED
DRAWING NUMBER REVISION
PNG-C-200-107 -
DISCIPLINE I RESOURCE CENTER I LINE NUMBER
STATION 3+10
75
750
TAPER FROM BANKFULL
...............
TO EXISTING IS' T011'
45
........... -II..
IIII
745
TAPER FROM BANKFULL III II
TO EX IS TING I5' TO 25' III III III III SLOPE=1'.1 SLOPE=4'.1 III III
III III III _
74
...............
FILL WITH _- SLOP, E=1.5:1
-- I I)
740
-
NATIVE MATERIAL
SLOPE _ ]:1
1.1 ITH
_
III III III
EXISTING
I
FILLWITH
_
GRADE
NATIVE MATERIAL
'35
........ ...
735
CROSS SECTION #3 PROPOSED CHANNEL
TYPICAL POOL- RIVER LEFT
73
730
STATION 3+95
75
750
TAPER FROM BANKFULL
BUBB
TO EXISTING 15' TO 25'
TAPER FROM BANKFULL
TO EXISTING 15' TO 25'
74
1.10PE3:1
745
LOPE 1:1
74
SLOPE =10:1
11 IN I
740
PROPOSED CHANNEL EXISTING III
I
GRADE
73
735
CROSS SECTION #4
FILL WITH
TYPICAL RIFFLE (Dmax = 6.75')
NATIVE MATERIAL
73
730
- 0 -40 - 0 - 0 - 0 10 20 0 40 50
60 0 BO
90
CROSS SECTION VIEW
PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED * DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING * USE DIMENSIONS ONLY
PIEDMONT'S NATURAL GAS FACILITY DRAWINGS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL (OM -1095) * DRAWING IS CURRENT ONLY THROUGH THE LATEST REVISED DATE * TO INSURE THERE IS NO RISK OF INAPPROPRIATE
DISCLOSER ALL PREVIOUS PAPER COPIES OF THIS DRAWING MUST BE DESTROYED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RECORDS & INFO. MANAGEMENT RIM POLICY 1001
REVISION(S) DESCRIPTION BY CHK APPD DESCRIPTION APPROVALS
AREA CODE— INITIALS
REGIONAL MILL CREEK STREAM RESTORATION
ACCOUNT NUMBER WAS ENGINEER Piedmont MGR TECH CROSS SECTIONS
PROJECT NUMBER 1180614 DAE MALS REC&STD Natural Gas WINSTON SALEM NC
DRAWING BY
STATION ID °A a INITIALS PRINCIPAL COPYRIGHT 2015 PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CORP.
CHECKER INITIALS 10126/2018 N/A Lg ENGINEER CORP. OFCIHARLOTTE, NCCE 4720 28210
DRIVE Resource Center City, State
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
REF. DWG(S)
SHEET(S) 07 1 DWG SCALE AS SHOWN
DWG DATE 2018-10-26 SUPERSEDED
DRAWING NUMBER REVISION
PNG-C-200-107 -
DISCIPLINE I RESOURCE CENTER I LINE NUMBER

11
TOP OF RIFFLEf
TOP OF GLIDE
P�
LOW FLOW BENCH
P� POOL
POINT BAR
LOW FLOW BENCH
FLOODPRONE REA
M
6
1/3 to 1/2 D mac- bkf
1/4 to 1/3 W-bkf
SECTION A
LOW FLOW BENCH
NOT TO SCALE
����oMME o•:.
Eao° �A°:ALL
-1x
.sN roc. .n sKs wss.oxs
*11
wiTN
i
suesTanTe. / ��FHc ,n.
ROCK/LOG J -HOOK
PLAN VIEW (TYPICAL)
NOT TO SCALE
KF�
SILL ROCK
COVER FINAL LAYER OF
BRUSH WITH 1 FOOT OF
DIRT / SOD MAT
ALTERNATE ANGLE BRUSH
LEFT RIGHT PER LAYER.OPPOSING
CHANNEL BANK CHANNEL BANK 30' — 45' ANGLES
BANKFULL
ROOTER (OPTIODIGGENAL) AL)
LOG
'CO FOOTER (OPTIONAL)
(TYPICAL)
PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED * DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING * USE DIMENSIONS ONLY
PIEDMONT'S NATURAL GAS FACILITY DRAWINGS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL (OM -1095) * DRAWING IS CURRENT ONLY THROUGH THE LATEST REVISED DATE * TO INSURE THERE IS NO RISK OF INAPPROPRIATE
DISCLOSER ALL PREVIOUS PAPER COPIES OF THIS DRAWING MUST BE DESTROYED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RECORDS & INFO. MANAGEMENT RIM POLICY 1001
DATE REVISION(S) DESCRIPTION BY CHK APPD DESCRIPTION APPROVALS
AREA CODE TEINITIALSREGIONAL MILL CREEK STREAM RESTORATION
ACCOUNT NUMBER ° WAS ENGINEER �' Piedmont STRUCTURE DETAILS
PROJECT NUMBER 1180614 DAE NIA`s RMGR TECH EC&STD Natural Gas WINSTON SALEM NC
DRAWING BY
STATION ID °A a NITIA PRINCIPAL COPYRIGHT 2015 PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CORP.
CHECKER INITIALS 10/26/2018 N/A g ENGINEER CORP. OFCIHARLOTTE, NCCE 4720 28210
DRIVE Resource Center City, State
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
REF. DWG(S)
SHEET(S) 08 1 DWG SCALE AS SHOWN
DWG DATE 2018-10-26 SUPERSEDED
DRAWING NUMBER REVISION
PNG-C-200-108 -
DISCIPLINE I RESOURCE CENTER I LINE NUMBER
STREAM
SCOU�J CHANNEL
HOLE
PIN ROCK 1� 10°
I I
THALWEG
1/46kf
BURY USING
RIFFLE SUBSTRATE
L1/3 Bkf—Ll/3 Bkfi1/3 Bkf1 NATURAL
FOOTING
(ROOTWADS/LOGS)
TOE WOOD
TOE WOOD
CROSS SECTION VIEW (TYPICAL)
PLAN VIEW (TYPICAL)
NOT TO SCALE
NOT TO SCALE
PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED * DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING * USE DIMENSIONS ONLY
PIEDMONT'S NATURAL GAS FACILITY DRAWINGS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL (OM -1095) * DRAWING IS CURRENT ONLY THROUGH THE LATEST REVISED DATE * TO INSURE THERE IS NO RISK OF INAPPROPRIATE
DISCLOSER ALL PREVIOUS PAPER COPIES OF THIS DRAWING MUST BE DESTROYED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RECORDS & INFO. MANAGEMENT RIM POLICY 1001
DATE REVISION(S) DESCRIPTION BY CHK APPD DESCRIPTION APPROVALS
AREA CODE TEINITIALSREGIONAL MILL CREEK STREAM RESTORATION
ACCOUNT NUMBER ° WAS ENGINEER �' Piedmont STRUCTURE DETAILS
PROJECT NUMBER 1180614 DAE NIA`s RMGR TECH EC&STD Natural Gas WINSTON SALEM NC
DRAWING BY
STATION ID °A a NITIA PRINCIPAL COPYRIGHT 2015 PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CORP.
CHECKER INITIALS 10/26/2018 N/A g ENGINEER CORP. OFCIHARLOTTE, NCCE 4720 28210
DRIVE Resource Center City, State
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
REF. DWG(S)
SHEET(S) 08 1 DWG SCALE AS SHOWN
DWG DATE 2018-10-26 SUPERSEDED
DRAWING NUMBER REVISION
PNG-C-200-108 -
DISCIPLINE I RESOURCE CENTER I LINE NUMBER