Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20181489 Ver 1_WRC Comments_20181121Strickland, Bev From: Leslie, Andrea J Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 2:56 PM To: Jake Byers; Homewood, Sue Cc: Elliott, William A CIV USARMY CESAW (US); 'Tony Davis'; Christine Gears; Kevin Tweedy Subject: RE: [External] RE: Fisher River Restoration - Surry County 10-4, Jake. Fortunately, the Fisher River isn't chock full of sensitive or rare species, so I'm not super concerned about this. I just ask you to use excellent sediment and erosion control on the project and do what you can to minimize sediment loss with instream work. Andrea Andrea Leslie Mountain Habitat Conservation Coordinator NC Wildlife Resources Commission 645 Fish Hatchery Rd., Building B Marion, NC 28752 828-803-6054 (office) 828-400-4223 (cell) www.ncwildlife.org Get NC Wildlife Update delivered to your inbox from the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission. Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. From: Jake Byers <jbyers@eprusa.net> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 2:46 PM To: Leslie, Andrea J <andrea.leslie@ncwildlife.org>; Homewood, Sue <sue.homewood@ncdenr.gov> Cc: Elliott, William A CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <William.A.Elliott@usace.army.mil>; 'Tony Davis' <tony.davis@nc.nacdnet. net>; Christine Gears <cgears@eprusa.net>; Kevin Tweedy <ktweedy@eprusa.net> Subject: RE: [External] RE: Fisher River Restoration - Surry County . , . O , . ternal email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Thanks, Andrea. The depth of water in most of the area that would need to be excluded would probably exclude using jersey barriers and the amount of stone required would probably increase the construction cost by 30% or more. To divert the flow some sort of pile system would need to be used which would also be very expensive. This is information from the construction contractor. Thanks, -Jake From: Leslie, Andrea J <andrea.leslie@ncwildlife.org> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 2:36 PM To: Jake Byers <jbyers@eprusa.net>; Homewood, Sue <sue.homewood@ncdenr.gov> Cc: Elliott, William A CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <William.A.Elliott@usace.army.mil>; 'Tony Davis' <tony.davis@nc.nacdnet.net>; Christine Gears <cgears@eprusa.net>; Kevin Tweedy <ktweedy@eprusa.net> Subject: RE: [External] RE: Fisher River Restoration - Surry County Jake, I sent my comments to your old address at Baker. Attached are my comments. Andrea Andrea Leslie Mountain Habitat Conservation Coordinator NC Wildlife Resources Commission 645 Fish Hatchery Rd., Building B Marion, NC 28752 828-803-6054 (office) 828-400-4223 (cell) www.ncwildlife.org Get NC Wildlife Update delivered to your inbox from the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission. Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. From: Jake Byers <jbyers@eprusa.net> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 2:33 PM To: Homewood, Sue <sue.homewood@ncdenr.gov> Cc: Elliott, William A CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <William.A.Elliott@usace.army.mil>; Leslie, Andrea J <andrea.leslie@ncwildlife.org>; 'Tony Davis' <tony.davis@nc.nacdnet. net>; Christine Gears <cgears@eprusa.net>; Kevin Tweedy <ktweedy@eprusa.net> Subject: RE: [External] RE: Fisher River Restoration - Surry County See attached for the lease agreement. The culvert is being requested by Surry parks and rec to widen their trail. The parks director has stated that they have cross country meets there regularly and that point becomes a significant bottle neck. However, if this is a regulatory hurdle we can take it out. Let me know if this is a good enough reason for the impact. If so, we'll send an updated table. I don't think I've seen or maybe misplaced the WRC comments. However I have received comments on similar projects on large river systems regarding working in the wet. I appreciate the need to work in the dry as much as possible but the Fisher River is a 61 square mile drainage area so pumping around is not a viable option. Installing diversions or cofferdams is cost prohibitive and is likely to disturb as much or more then just doing the work. I can't lay my hands on it right now but we have a map showing the rapid bank erosion along this bend on the fisher. This bend has lost 50' or more bank in the last 15 years or so. The sediment entering the river and potential turbidity as a result of construction is miniscule compared to what has already entered and what will continue to enter the river without this work. We will pump around on the unnamed tributary. Please let me know if I am missing something or not addressing the intent of the WRC comments. Thanks, -Jake From: Homewood, Sue <sue.homewood@ncdenr.gov> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 2:09 PM To: Jake Byers <jbyers@eprusa.net> Cc: Elliott, William A CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <William.A.Elliott@usace.army.mil>; Leslie, Andrea J <andrea.leslie@ncwildlife.org>; 'Tony Davis' <tony.davis@nc.nacdnet. net>; Christine Gears <cgears@eprusa.net>; Kevin Tweedy <ktweedv@eprusa.net> Subject: RE: [External] RE: Fisher River Restoration - Surry County The lease agreement will be sufficient. We need to account for that culvert impact. I'm not sure if William would cover it under the NWP27 or if he needs to add another NWP to cover that fill. For now we at least need it explained, whether it's temporary or permanent and we need it justified (if there's a trail there now, why does it need to be widened?) Greenways are usually justified as 10-12' wide so we'd need an explanation for why the added culvert there. There's no way to go back and fix the online form so what most people do is take the table from the old printed version of the PCN, fill it out and submit it as additional information. Or create a new table and send it to us. Sending it by email is fine. Please also comment on WRCs request to divert flows around the work area where you propose to not work in the dry along the Fisher River. Happy Thanksgiving Thanks, Sue Homewood Division of Water Resources, Winston Salem Regional Office Department of Environmental Quality 336 776 9693 office 336 813 1863 mobile Sue. Homewood@ncdenr.gov 450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300 Winston Salem NC 27105 Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. From: Jake Byers <jbvers@eprusa.net> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 1:53 PM To: Homewood, Sue <sue.homewood@ncdenr.gov> Cc: Elliott, William A CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <William.A.Elliott@usace.army.mil>; Leslie, Andrea J <andrea.leslie@ncwildlife.org>; 'Tony Davis' <tony.davis@nc.nacdnet. net>; Christine Gears <cgears@eprusa.net>; Kevin Tweedy <ktweedv@eprusa.net> Subject: [External] RE: Fisher River Restoration - Surry County Hi Sue, Agent authorization —The county has a lease agreement (1977-2023) with the McCormicks for the portion of their property on the park side of the Fisher River. We have approval to do the work from them. Do we still need an agent authorization or will a copy of the recorded lease work? Impacts —The culvert you mentioned was by request of the county to widen the existing trail through the park. We by mistake did not add that 20' as permanent impact to that perennial stream. Do we need to just correct in the online system? We're tying to get used to that system. There are not any wetlands within the project work area on this site so the language of avoiding them was a holdover from a previous example. Thanks and hope you have a great Thanksgiving. -Jake From: Homewood, Sue <sue.homewood@ncdenr.gov> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 5:13 PM To: Jake Byers <jbvers@eprusa.net> Cc: Elliott, William A CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <William.A.Elliott@usace.army.mil>; Leslie, Andrea J <andrea.leslie@ncwildlife.org> Subject: Fisher River Restoration - Surry County Hi Jake, A couple questions/comments about this one: -in the application it mentions avoiding streams and wetlands along the construction route as much as possible and using mats where possible. We need to see all jurisdictional features within the project limits (including access roads and staging areas) and all impacts need to be identified on the PCN impact table, identified as temporary or permanent and justified. Sheet 6 shows one such culvert, I believe, but it's unclear where there may be others or other jurisdictional features. -we need an owner authorization for both property owners, there's only one in the PCN package. Thanks, Sue Homewood Division of Water Resources, Winston Salem Regional Office Department of Environmental Quality 336 776 9693 office 336 813 1863 mobile Sue. Homewood@ncdenr.gov 450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300 Winston Salem NC 27105 Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.