20171527 Ver 1_Individual_20181205

TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS
5410 Trinity Roan P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
Raleiqh, NC 2760 7
/
PERSON COUNTY MEGA PARK� (SAID
INDIVIDUAL PERMIT REQUEST
DC @ [10wC
DEC 0 2018
6E--Q-ATER RESOURCES
401 & BUFFER PER ITT G
PREPARED FOR:
PERSON COUNTY BUSINESS AND INDUSTRIAL CENTER, INC.
ATTN: MR. DAVID NEWELL & MRS. SHERRY WILBORN
PREPARED BY:
TIMMONS GROUP
5410 TRINITY ROAD, SUITE 102
RALEIGH, NC 27607
November '2018
I. of 2-7

5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleiqh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On behalf of Person County Business and Industrial Center, Inc. (Applicant), Timmons Group is submitting this
Individual Permit Request for the development of a semiconductor chip manufacturing plant, to include both
on and off-site roadway improvements and utility installations, at the Person County Mega Park (Project). The
Person County Mega Park is comprised of 1,456 acres located on Edwin Robertson Road, 5 miles north of
Roxboro in Person County, North Carolina. The Project is situated on approximately 318 acres, within the
Mega Park, immediately south of Edwin Robertson Road. For the purpose of this permit application, the
Project also includes study corridors along adjacent roadways for transportation improvements and utility
installation. Roadway improvements are proposed along Edwin Robertson Road and Shiloh Church Road.
Water and natural gas lines are proposed along Chub Lake Road and McGhees Mill Road (Figure 1 -Vicinity
Map).
The purpose of the proposed project is to develop a semiconductor chip manufacturing plant at the Person
County Mega Park and bring significant economic relief to the citizens of Person County. The proposed Project
layout is comprised of an approximate 3.5 million square feet central operations facility to house the clean
room, manufacturing spaces, office spaces, mechanical yard, vehicular load deck areas and associated parking.
The property is suitable for the proposed development based on specific industry requirements including, but
not limited to, a minimum of 200 acres with compatible zoning, access to available and high-quality electricity,
experienced workforce, and direct routes to interstates.
It is rare that a single site meets all the criteria necessary for the successful development of a semiconductor
manufacturing chip plant. Power, water and wastewater requirements for a semiconductor chip
manufacturing plant are significant. Person County has identified the proposed Mega Park as an economic
development priority and has invested significant resources into the planning and due -diligence. The County
has incorporated concerns of relevant stakeholders into their master plan and studied the development needs
and patterns of the industrial clients it wishes to attract. The County has completed the environmental and
utility infrastructure studies necessary to attract industrial users, in order to facilitate an expedient approval
process. The final location and layout of the proposed Project was determined based on avoidance and
minimization of impacts to environmentally sensitive areas to the maximum extent practicable, while meeting
the development needs of the industry.
The existing availability of power sets the Person County Mega Park apart from alternative locations, not only
in North Carolina, but also globally. Currently the proposed Mega Park is served by a 2,422 Megawatt Steam
Plant, a 729 Megawatt Steam Plant, and a 49 Megawatt Combined Cycle Plant. In addition, multiple 230 kV
lines and 115 kV lines currently cross the property. These sources are capable of meeting large demands of
electric service from multiple directions and provide redundant electric service that enhance the power
quality to a customer, which is vital to the semiconductor industry.
The impacts of utility power disruptions are probably the greatest concern in the semiconductor wafer
fabrication industry and the absence of potential sources of vibration (i.e. rail) further differentiates this site
from other alternatives. The semiconductor chip manufacturing processes are vulnerable to even tiny power
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS ( LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
2of27

0 00000 0, 5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleiqh, IVC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
disruptions because a single mistake anywhere in the dozens to hundreds of steps, render the product useless.
There can be losses of millions of dollars an hour when a chip manufacturing plant shuts down.
The amount of available water and wastewater, in addition to the amount and quality of available power,
further sets this property apart. Water requirements for the semiconductor fab industry begin at 1 million
gallons per day (MGD) and increase to 4MGD, once the site has reached its full production capacity. The area's
excess water capacity is 5MGD and excess wastewater capacity is 3MGD. Based on the existing infrastructure,
the selected alternative would not only meet the minimum requirements of the proposed development, but
would also leave additional capacity (1MGD) remaining to meet the other needs of the community. Therefore,
the proposed Project was determined to be the most suitable option based on the size and currently available
infrastructure (i.e. electrical, natural gas, water and sewer).
The proposed Project will bring significant economic relief to the citizens of Person County, currently
identified as a Tier 1 County. The N.C. Department of Commerce annually ranks the state's 100 counties based
on economic well-being and assigns each a tier designation. These designations are based on the average
unemployment rate, median household income, percentage growth in population, and adjusted property tax
base per capita. The 40 most distressed counties are designated as Tier 1, the next 40 as Tier 2, and the least
20 distressed as Tier 3. Person County is currently ranked as a Tier 1 county. Based on an Economic Impact
Study completed by the N.C. Department of Commerce for the project, the ongoing, annual employment impact
of the new facility will result in approximately 7,870 jobs in the Person County area including 4,000 direct
company jobs and an additional 3,870 jobs in the region through indirect and induced effects.
In order to accomplish the goals of the Project, a total of 1.94 acres of unavoidable permanent impacts to
jurisdictional wetlands and 10,529 linear feet of stream are required. These unavoidable impacts will be
mitigated through the purchase of compensatory wetland and stream credits through the N.0 Division of
Mitigation Services (DMS), contingent on the agency approval. The purchase of this compensatory mitigation
will ensure the unavoidable impacts proposed by the Project, will result in a "no net loss" of aquatic resource
function and value to Waters of the U.S.
The Person County Business and Industrial Center, Inc (PCBIC) believes in the concept of being active in the
development of multiple mitigation options that provide both the environmental improvement and public
value improvement for Person County residents. Therefore, PCBIC will explore several mitigation options as
part of the permitting process. Payment to the NC Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS) will be an option;
however, flexibility to explore other mitigation opportunities that can better serve the public and environment
will be incorporated into the final mitigation package proposed for the project.
Impacts to jurisdictional features were avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable throughout
the planning and design process including the utilization of the delineation, minimization of partial stream or
wetland impacts, minimization of impacts to all primary drainage ways and floodplains, and strict adherence
to all state and local stormwater control measures. The current proposed layout provides sufficient area to
construct the approximately 3.5 million square feet central operations facility as well as position the facility
along the existing ridgeline which will serve to minimize impacts to 2nd order streams on the property.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
3of27

� 5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
The purpose of the proposed project is to develop a semiconductor chip manufacturing plant at the Person
County Mega Park and bring significant economic relief to the citizens of Person County. The proposed Project
includes the development of a 3.5 million square feet facility as well as the associated roadway improvements
and utility installation. The following permit support document demonstrates that, while meeting the needs of
the semiconductor industry, the proposed Project results in the least impacts to sensitive environmental
resources and will significantly benefit the citizens of Person County.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
4of27

5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleiqh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
PERSON COUNTY BUSINESS AND INDUSTRIAL CENTER, INC. - PERSON COUNTY MEGA
PARK INDIVIDUAL PERMIT REQUEST
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVESUMMARY..........................................................................................................................................................................2
1.0 PRJOECT INFORMATION SHEET...........................................................................................................................................7
2.0 INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................................................................9
3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION.......................................................................................................................................................................10
3.1 Site Location................................................................................................................................................................................10
3.2 Site Conditions...........................................................................................................................................................................10
4.0 PURPOSE AND NEED..............................................................................................................................................................11
5.0 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS...................................................................................................................................................14
5.1 No -Action Alternative.............................................................................................................................................................14
5.2 Off-site Alternatives.................................................................................................................................................................15
5.3 On -Site Alternatives.................................................................................................................................................................18
5.4 Preferred Alternative..............................................................................................................................................................
20
6.0 JURISDICTIONAL IMPACTS..................................................................................................................................................22
7.0 AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION.....................................................................................................................................23
8.0 COMPENSATORY MITIGATION..........................................................................................................................................
24
9.0 SUPPORTING SITE INFORMATION...................................................................................................................................
25
9.1 Threatened and Endangered Species Information......................................................................................................25
9.2 Cultural Resources...................................................................................................................................................................
25
10.0 CONCLUSIONS.......................................................................................................................................................................26
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
5of27

TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
G199DU111DIW
5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
Raleigh, NC 27607
Appendix A
Joint Permit Application
Appendix B
Figures
Appendix C
Preliminary Construction Drawings
Appendix D
Waters of the U.S. Impacts Maps
Appendix E
On -Site Alternatives
Appendix F
Agency Coordination
Appendix G
Zoning Information
Appendix H
Economic Impact Study
Appendix I
N.C. Division of Mitigation Services Correspondence
Appendix J
Duke Energy Letter of Support
Appendix K
Secondary and Cumulative Impact Analysis
Appendix L
Site Criteria Evaluation and Comparison Table (Provided by CH2M Hilo
Appendix M
NCDOT Approved Traffic Impact Analysis
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
6of27

!
TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
1.0 PRJOECT INFORMATION SHEET
General
Project Name:
State:
Location:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Subject Property Size:
5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
Raleiqh, NC 27607
Person County Mega Park
North Carolina
Person County
36.4779
-78.9941
318 Acres
HUC Code: 03010104
Waterbodies on Property: Unnamed Tributaries to Story's Creek & Marlowe Creek
Corresponding
Information
USGS Quad: Olive Hill & Roxboro
County: Person County
Applicant Person County Business and Industrial Center, Inc.
Name: Mr. David Newell, Chairman EDC, President
Address: PO Box 1824
Roxboro, North Carolina 27573
Contact:
Telephone: C: 336-597-1752
Email: [e-mail]
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
7of27

TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
Agent Timmons Group
Name: Mrs. Anna Reusche
Address:
Contact:
Telephone:
Email:
5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
Raleiqh, NC 27607
5410 Trinity Road, Suite 102
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
0: 919-866-4500 C: 919-816-7745
[e-mail]
Anticipated Permit Authorizations
0 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Individual Permit
• North Carolina Division of Water Resources: 401 General Water Quality Certification
• Erosion and Sediment Control Plan & Grading Permit
• Site Plan Permit
• NCDOT Encroachment Agreement
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
8of27

� 5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleiqh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
2.0 INTRODUCTION
On behalf of the Person County Business and Industrial Center, Inc. (Applicant), Timmons Group is submitting
this permit request for the Person County Mega Park (Project). The proposed project is located approximately
5 miles north of Roxboro in Person County, North Carolina (see Figure 1. Vicinity Map). A total of 1,456 was
evaluated for the project and has been designated by Person County as a Mega Park. The proposed
development is situated on approximately 318 acres located within the Mega Park. The proposed Mega Park is
comprised of both wooded and agricultural fields. Land use surrounding the proposed Mega Park is
predominately comprised of undeveloped forested lands interspersed with agricultural fields and single family
residential homes. Access to the Mega Park is via Country Club Road or Edwin Robertson Road.
The purpose of the proposed project is to develop a semiconductor chip manufacturing plant at the Person
County Mega Park and bring significant economic relief to the citizens of Person County. For the purpose of
this permit application, the Project Site also includes an approximate 100 -foot corridor along Edwin Robertson
and Shiloh Church Roads as well as corridors for both the proposed water line and natural gas line, intended to
serve the site. No impacts are anticipated for either utility, as they will occur within the existing right of way of
Chub Lake Road and McGhees Mill Road.
Semiconductor chip manufacturing plants (commonly called a fab or foundry) produce devices such as
integrated circuits. An integrated circuit or monolithic integrated circuit (also referred to as an IC, a chip, or
microchip) is a set of electronic circuits on one small flat piece (or "chip") of semiconductor material, which is
normally constructed of silicon. ICs are now used in virtually all electronic devices and have revolutionized the
world of electronics. Computers, mobile phones, and other digital home appliances are now inextricable parts
of the structure of modern societies, made possible by the small size and low cost of ICs.
The County has incorporated concerns of relevant stakeholders into their master plan and studied the
development needs and patterns of the industrial clients it wishes to attract. The County has completed the
rezoning, environmental and utility infrastructure studies necessary, in order to facilitate an expedient
approval process. The property is currently zoned RC -Rural Conservation and the proposed use is consistent
with the current zoning and is considered a permitted use. See zoning information included in Appendix G. The
proposed Mega Park was determined suitable for the proposed development based on specific industry
requirements including, but not limited to, a minimum of 200 acres with compatible zoning, access to available
and high-quality electricity (3 Megawatts during initial phases), experienced workforce, and direct routes to
interstates.
Person County has identified the proposed Mega Park as an economic development priority and has invested
significant resources into the planning and due -diligence required to develop the Mega Park. The N.C.
Department of Commerce currently designates Person County as one of the most economically distressed
counties in the State of North Carolina. The proposed project is anticipated to result in approximately 7,870
jobs in the region.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
9of27

5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
Due -diligence completed to date includes a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, geotechnical study,
wetland and stream investigations, historic and cultural resource surveys, threatened and endangered species
surveys, a traffic impact analysis, and economic impact assessment. In addition, on-site concurrence meetings
and pre -application meetings have been held with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and N.C. Division of Water
Resources.
To accomplish the goals of the Project, the Applicant has proposed the Preferred Alternative as the Least
Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA). Based on the proposed Mega Park layout
approximately 10,529 linear feet of stream and 1.94 acres of wetland will be impacted by the proposed project.
Impacts to jurisdictional features were avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable throughout
the planning and design process including the utilization of the delineation, minimization of partial stream or
wetland impacts, minimization of impacts to all primary drainage ways and floodplains, and strict adherence
to all state and local stormwater control measures. These unavoidable impacts will be mitigated through the
purchase of compensatory wetland and stream credits through the N.0 Division of Mitigation Services (DMS),
contingent on the agency approval. Therefore, the proposed Project has been determined to meet the needs of
the semiconductor industry, provide considerable economic relief to the citizens of Person County and will
result in the least impacts to sensitive environmental resources.
3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
3.1 Site Location
The proposed Mega Park comprises approximately 1,456 acres and is located approximately 5 miles north of
Roxboro in Person County, North Carolina (see Figure 1. Vicinity Map). The proposed Mega Park is located in
the Roanoke watershed (HUC 03010104) and all surface waters drain to Story's Creek and Marlowe Creek,
located along the western and eastern property boundaries respectively. The property is located in the
Piedmont Physiographic Province.
The Project Site is situated on approximately 318 acres, within the Mega Park, immediately south of Edwin
Robertson Road. For the purpose of this permit application, the Project Site also includes an approximate 100 -
foot corridor along Edwin Robertson and Shiloh Church Roads for the anticipated roadway improvements as
well as corridors for both the proposed water line and natural gas line, intended to serve the site. The
proposed utility corridors are located within the right of way of Country Club Road, Chub Lake Road and
McGhees Mill Road.
3.2 Site Conditions
Access to the Project Site is via Country Club Road or Edwin Robertson Road. Current land use at the Project
Site includes both forested and maintained areas. Forested areas on the site are characterized as pine and
mixed hardwood communities. Maintained areas at the Project Site include agricultural fields used for grazing
cattle, one single-family home, and an electrical transmission easement. Land use surrounding the proposed
Mega Park is predominately comprised of undeveloped forested lands interspersed with agricultural fields and
single-family residential homes.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
10 of 27

00000 0
0 i i 5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleiqh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
The Project Site has moderate slopes along a ridgeline that bisects the center of the property. Elevations range
from 450 feet above mean sea level (MSL) along the boundaries to 500 feet MSL in the center of the Project
Site. Surface waters on the property drain to Story's Creek and Marlowe Creek, located along the western and
eastern property boundaries of the Mega Park respectively.
Jurisdictional waters of the U.S. at the Project Site include both wetlands and streams and are primarily
characterized as small headwater wetland systems associated 1St order streams. The entirety of the 1,456 -acre
Mega Park was delineated to identify the presence and location of jurisdictional wetlands and streams. The
wetland delineation was performed in accordance with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) 1987
Delineation Manual and subsequently issued Regional Supplement to the 1987 Delineation Manual. The initial
field work for the proposed Mega Park was conducted in June and August of 2016. The delineation was verified
by Eric Alsmeyer on July 28th, August 4th and August 5th. Additional areas associated with roadway
improvements were delineated in November 2017. The delineation for the transportation corridor was
reviewed by USACE and the NCDWR on May 3rd, 2018. Changes to the delineation have been incorporated and
are displayed on Figure 5 - Waters of the U.S. Delineation Map included in Appendix B. There are no wetlands,
open water, stream and associated upland buffers within the Project Area that are under a deed restriction,
conservation easement restrictive covenant, or other land use protective instrument.
4.0 PURPOSE AND NEED
The purpose of the proposed project is to develop a semiconductor chip manufacturing plant at the Person
County Mega Park, which will serve to bring significant economic relief to the citizens of Person County. An
integrated circuit or monolithic integrated circuit (also referred to as an IC, a chip, or microchip) is a set of
electronic circuits on one small flat piece (or "chip") of semiconductor material, normally silicon. ICs are now
used in virtually all electronic equipment and have revolutionized the world of electronics. Computers, mobile
phones, and other digital home appliances are now inextricable parts of the structure of modern societies,
made possible by the small size and low cost of ICs.
The County has incorporated concerns of relevant stakeholders into their master plan and studied the
development needs and patterns of the industrial clients it wishes to attract. Based on these findings, the
optimal layout for a semiconductor chip manufacturing plant incorporates all elements of production
contiguous to one another and arranged in the most efficient manner for maximum efficiency and cost
benefits.
The proposed development includes an approximate 3.5 million square feet central operations facility to house
the components of a semiconductor chip manufacturing plant. The central part of a semiconductor chip
manufacturing plant is the clean room, an area where the environment is controlled to eliminate all dust, since
even a single speck can ruin a microcircuit, which has features much smaller than dust. The clean room must
also be damped against vibration and kept within narrow bands of temperature and humidity. Controlling
temperature and humidity is critical for minimizing static electricity. In addition, the manufacturing facility
will consist of cooling towers, waste water treatment facilities, waste facilities, office space, associated parking,
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
11 of 27

5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 mmlimmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
and vehicular load deck areas. Manufacturing facilities of this size require high-quality and easily accessible
electrical power which is uniquely available at the proposed Mega Park.
For the purpose of this permit application, the Project Site also includes an approximate 100 -foot corridor
along Edwin Roberston and Shiloh Church Road necessary for future roadway improvements. A Traffic Impact
Analysis (TIA) was approved by the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) in 2017 to
evaluate the transportation impact of an industrial use mega -site in Person County, North Carolina. The TIA
was based on the development of a semi -conductor facility. The study evaluates the development over the next
ten years and encompasses two build phases. Phase I is anticipated to be 2.35 million square feet and Phase II
(Full Build) is anticipated to be approximately 3 million square feet for a total of 5.5 million square feet
constructed over the course of ten years. The study analyses both Phase I and Full Build (Phase I and II
combined). A copy of the TIA has been included as Appendix M.
Based on the results of the TIA, roadways expected to be significantly impacted by the proposed development
include:
• US 501/Boston Road
• SR 1322/Edwin Robertson Road
• SR 1322/Shiloh Church Road
• SR 1326/Woodsdale Road
• SR 1333/Country Club Road
• SR 1337/Chub Lake Road
• SR 1334/Oak Grove Road
• SR 1336/SR 1336/McGhees Mill Road
Following the completion of the TIA, recommended transportation Improvements for Phase I, anticipated to
occur within the first two years of the development include:
• Edwin Robertson Road at Site Access 1 (east entrance)
• Edwin Robertson Road/Shiloh Church Road @ Woodsdale Road
• Shiloh Church Road at US 501
Impacts to Waters of the U.S. anticipated to occur during Phase I of the development include stream crossings
(include impact IDs) from the construction of Site Access 1 (east entrance). No other impacts are anticipated to
occur during Phase I.
Additional impacts to Waters of the U.S. anticipated to occur during the development of Phase II (Full Build)
including stream impacts from Site Access 2 (West Entrance) and the circulatory roadway. Impacts will also
result from the widening proposed along Shiloh Church Road.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
12 of 27

5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleiqh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
The proposed development also includes corridors for a 12" waterline to be serviced by the City of Roxboro as
well natural gas line intended to serve the site. No impacts are anticipated for either utility, as they will occur
within the existing right of way of Chub Lake Road and McGhees Mill Road as shown on Figure 1- Vicinity Map.
The proposed Person County Mega Park will bring significant economic relief to the citizens of Person County.
Since 2012, direct employment in North Carolina's semiconductor industry has grown by 9%. Today there are
51 semiconductor device and semiconductor machinery manufacturers in North Carolina. They employ about
4,500 people across the state with an average wage of $93,488 per year. North Carolina's semiconductor
industry is backed by a booming ecosystem of advanced electronics and technology manufactures -businesses
with workers with easily -transferable skillsets for the semi -conductor industry. Since 2012, jobs in North
Carolina's semiconductor ecosystem increased by 14% making our state fifth in the nation for job growth in
these sectors and outpacing national growth year over year.
Based on the 2017 North Carolina Department of Commerce report, the median household income for families
living in Person County was $54,474 and the per capita income for the county was $22,189. About 9.4% of
families and 19% of the population were below the poverty line in Person County. The N.C. Department of
Commerce annually ranks the state's 100 counties based on economic well-being and assigns each a tier
designation. These designations are based on the average unemployment rate, median household income,
percentage growth in population, and adjusted property tax base per capita. The 40 most distressed counties
are designated as Tier 1, the next 40 as Tier 2, and the least 20 distressed as Tier 3. Person County is currently
ranked as a Tier 1 county.
Person County has identified the proposed Mega Park as an economic development priority and has invested
significant resources into the planning and due -diligence required to develop the property. Due -diligence
completed includes a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, geotechnical study, wetland and stream
investigations, historic and cultural resource surveys, threatened and endangered species surveys, a traffic
impact analysis, and economic impact assessment. In addition, on-site concurrence meetings and pre -
application meetings have been held with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and N.C. Division of Water
Resources. A copy of all reports has been included in Appendices B and C respectively.
The County has completed the rezoning, environmental and utility infrastructure studies necessary to attract
industrial users, to facilitate an expedient approval process. The property is currently zoned RC -Rural
Conservation and the proposed use is consistent with the current zoning and is considered a permitted use.
See zoning information included in Appendix G.
Based on an Economic Impact Study completed by N.C. Department of Commerce for the project, the ongoing,
annual employment impact of the new facility will result in approximately 7,870 jobs in the Person County
area including 4,000 of direct company jobs and an additional 3,870 jobs in the region through indirect and
induced effects. A copy of the Economic Impacts Study has been included as Appendix H.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
13 of 27

5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleiqh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
5.0 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
The alternatives that were evaluated to determine the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable
Alternative (LEDPA) include: (1) The no -action alternative, (2) off-site alternatives, and (3) on-site
alternatives. Each alternative will be discussed in detail below. The criteria evaluated during site selection for
this type of facility is extensive. However, the quality and quantity of electricity, water and waste -water are the
primary considerations for this specific type of industry. After consideration of available alternatives to meet
the needs of the project, the Preferred Alternative as proposed, is considered the Least Environmentally
Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA). The Preferred Alternative has been designed to accommodate the
substantial energy, water, waste -water and land needs of a semi -conductor chip manufacturing plant which
will serve to bring significant economic relief to the distressed citizens of Person County.
5.1 No -Action Alternative
The No -Action Alternative, which would avoid all impacts to aquatic resources, is not a viable option given the
purpose and need of the Project is to develop the Person County Mega Park to house a specific industry and
deliver significant economic relief to the residents of Person County, currently categorized as a severely
distressed, Tier 1 County. Under the No Action Alternative, the proposed development of the Mega Park
facilities would not result in impacts to Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. and would not require the issuance of a
404/401 Individual Permit.
Due to the existing conditions of the proposed Mega Park and the sizing requirements of the proposed
industry, a contiguous 3.5 million square foot facility could not be developed without direct impacts to
Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. A typical semi -conductor chip manufacturing plant has significant space
requirements to house the clean room, cooling towers, waste water treatment facilities, waste facilities, office
space, parking and vehicular load deck areas. These components must be contiguous in order to function and
adjusting the layout to completely avoid streams and wetlands on the site would require separation of these
components and would not be suitable for proposed project.
Due to scattered aquatic resources throughout the Site, impacts to waters of the U.S. are unavoidable, and
therefore, development could not occur without a permit. The preferred layout provides sufficient area to
construct central operations facility along the existing ridgeline which will serve to minimize impacts to
streams and wetlands, avoid all impacts to the 100 -year floodplain, will not encroach on the existing utility
easement, and will require the least amount of cut and fill based on the existing percent slope.
Since 2012, direct employment in North Carolina's semiconductor industry has grown by 9%. Today there are
51 semiconductor device and semiconductor machinery manufacturers in North Carolina. They employ about
4,500 people across the state with an average wage of $93,488 per year. North Carolina's semiconductor
industry is backed by a booming ecosystem of advanced electronics and technology manufactures -businesses
with workers with easily -transferable skillsets for the semi -conductor industry. Since 2012, jobs in North
Carolina's semiconductor ecosystem increased by 14% making our state fifth in the nation for job growth in
these sectors and outpacing national growth year over year.
CVIL ENGINEERING I ENbIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
14 of 27

S 5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleiqh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
As stated previously, the North Carolina Department of Commerce (NCDOC) 2017 report indicates that
approximately 19% of the population within Person County were below the poverty line. Furthermore, Person
County is considered a Tier 1 county, meaning it is one of the most distressed counties in North Carolina.
Based on an Economic Impact Study completed by the N.C. Department of Commerce for the project, the
ongoing, annual employment impact of the new facility will result in approximately 7,870 jobs in the Person
County area including 4,000 direct company jobs and an additional 3,870 jobs in the region though indirect
and induced effects. A No -Action Alternative would result in the continued lack of economic growth resulting
in lost job opportunities, loss in tax revenue for the County, loss of local expenditure of dollars, and residents
would continue to be forced to commute farther distances for work.
5.2 Off-site Alternatives
It is rare that a single site meets all the criteria necessary for the successful development of a semiconductor
chip manufacturing plant. Based on information from the Economic Development Partnership of North
Carolina (EDP NC), there are currently three sites, in addition to the preferred alternative, that could be
considered for the proposed project. Based on a comparison of all four sites, the Person County Mega Park
best meets the minimum criteria for the proposed development and has the quantity and quality of power
available to accommodate the proposed development as well as the other minimum criteria including acreage,
water, wastewater, and natural gas. Furthermore, the selected alternative best meets the entirety of the
project's purpose including bringing significant economic relief to the citizens of Person County, currently
designated as a significantly distressed Tier 1 County.
Power requirements for a semiconductor chip manufacturing plant are significant with initial requirements
starting at 5 Megawatts (MW) with the ability to expand to 50 MW. Furthermore, high quality, uninterrupted
power is critical for the plant to operate and must be available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The impacts of
utility power disruptions are probably the greatest concern in the semiconductor manufacturing industry.
Semiconductor chips are vulnerable to even tiny power disruptions because a single mistake anywhere in the
dozens to hundreds of steps, render the product useless. It can take a week or more for a manufacturing plant
to start up again. There can be losses of millions of dollars an hour when a chip manufacturing plant shuts
down.
Producing complex computer chips is an extremely delicate process that blends microelectronics with
chemical and mechanical systems, requiring tolerances in microns. The process can take 30 to 50 days to
complete and can be totally ruined in a blink of an eye. Power outages frequently cause damage to chips, which
are fabricated on silicon wafers about the size of dinner plates that may take eight to 12 weeks to process.
Wafers that are inside processing machines at the time of an outage are often ruined. In some cases, a
shutdown of the air -purifying and conditioning system that keeps air in a chip factory free of dust also could
contaminate chips. A supply of fluctuation -free electricity is critical. Chip manufacturing plants and server
farms must balance the expense of building independent electricity resources with the cost of equipment
failures and network crashes caused by unreliable power.
The close proximity of the proposed chip plant at the Person County Mega Park to the 2,422 MW Steam Plant,
729 MW Steam Plant, 49 MW Combined Cycle Steam Plant, 230 kV and 115 kV lines crossing the project site
ensures that a steady stream of high-quality power will always be available to the plant. The current sources of
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
15 of 27

5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleiah, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
electricity at the site set it apart from any other alternatives. These sources are capable of meeting large
demands of electric service from multiple directions and provide redundant electric service that enhance the
power quality to a customer which is vital for the Semiconductor industry. Per direct communication with
representatives from Duke Energy, the availability of transmission capacities and voltages are a result of the
site's close proximity to the Roxboro Steam Station as well as multiple 230 kV and 115 kV transmission lines
are already present at the site. In addition, the proximity to power and the surrounding land use further
ensures that power to the site will not experience interruption. As stated above, power disruptions can render
the site inoperable and possible sources of power interruption are of significant concern when evaluating a
sites suitability. Lands surrounding the site are primarily agricultural or forested and do not, therefore,
undertake activities that would disrupt the flow of power to the site. The close proximity of the proposed main
facility further ensures that no power disruptions will occur along the lines prior to arriving at the site.
In addition to power, this type of industry also has significant water and wastewater requirements. As shown
on the table below, water requirements begin at 1 million gallons per day (MGD) to 4MGD once the site has
reached its full production capacity. The area's water excess capacity is 5MGD and wastewater excess capacity
is 3MGD. The Project Site will be serviced by the City of Roxboro through a 12" water line. Based on the
existing infrastructure, the selected alternative would not only meet the minimum requirements of the
proposed development, but would also have additional capacity (1MGD) remaining to meet other the needs of
the community.
The location will be serviced by PSNC Energy with an 8" pipeline operating at 150-350 PSI. The pipeline
capacity is 32,000 MCF per month. The Mega Park currently has a robust fiber network in place. Multiple
providers nearby can ensure fiber redundancy.
Based on information from CH2M Hill there are currently only 5 sites globally that compare to the suitability of
the Person County Mega Park. Based on information from the N.C. Economic Development Partnerships of N.C.,
detailed information concerning global site exploration activities are proprietary. Within the State of North
Carolina, however, there are currently three other mega -sites in addition to the Person County Mega Park.
These include the Chatham -Siler City Megasite, Greensboro -Randolph Megasite and the Moncure Megasite.
All three were evaluated as potential off-site alternatives for the proposed project. As stated above the primary
considerations for this type of industry are quality and quantity of electricity, water and waste -water. Based on
a comparison of all four sites, the proposed Project best meets the demands for the quantity and quality of
power available to accommodate the proposed development as well as the other minimum criteria including
acreage, water, wastewater, and natural gas. A comparison of all four sites is provided in Table 1 below.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
16 of 27

TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
Raleigh, NC 27607
Table 1: Primary Matrix Criteria Evaluated for Off -Site Alternatives
Meets minimum requirements
The Chatham -Siler City site is located on Zion Church Road, approximately three miles northwest of Siler
City in Chatham County and comprises approximately 2,879 acres. Existing infrastructure on the site includes
direct access to rail, availability of natural gas, a water capacity of 4+MGD and wastewater treatment capacity
of 4+ MGD, and 230 kV lines that crosses the property. Existing rail spurs, owned by Southern Railroad, are
located along the eastern boundary as well as transect the center of the site.
This site does not meet the full build out requirements for the proposed industry. In addition to a shortage of
power, the quality of power at the Site is negatively impacted by the presence of the existing rail line directly
adjacent to the Site. The vibrations caused by the railroad could significantly impact the operations of the
facility. As described above, the semiconductor chip plants are extremely sensitive and are vulnerable to
power disruption.
A semiconductor chip manufacturing plant at the Chatham Siler City site would put extreme stress on the
area's current water supply. Approximately 4 MGD is currently available to the Chatham Siler City site.
Although the Chatham Siler City site currently has enough water capacity to meet the full build out
requirements of the proposed project, there would not be any additional water capacity available.
Finally, Chatham County is not currently classified as a Tier 1 County and does not meet the entirety of the
stated purpose and need for the proposed project. According to the 2018 Tier Designations for North
Carolina, Chatham County is currently listed as a Tier 3 County (NCDOC, 2.018). A Tier 3 County is defined as
the least distressed in the State.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
17 of 27
Optimal
Chatham-
Greensboro Randolph
Moncure
Characteristics
Preferred Alternative
Siler City
Megasite
Megasite
Acreage
75-500
1350
2879
2000
2568
4+ MGD
3 MGD+
5 MGD Capacity
5.47 MGD capacity
Water
1 MGD, up to 4MD
capacity
capacity
Wastewater
0.75 MGD
3MGD
2.16 MGD
2.16 MGD
12 MGD+
6 -inch
6 -inch pipeline,
8 -inch pipeline, 350
pipeline, 350
12 -inch pipeline, 400
500 psi
Natural Gas
Available
PSI
psi
psi (Planned)
2,422 MW Steam
Plant, 729 MW Steam
Plant, 49 MW
Combined Cycle
Plant, multiple 230kV
Electricity
5MW, Exapand to 50
and 115kV (total 250-
230 kV
115 kV lines
(1000kV=1MW)
MW
300 MW capacity)
Capacity
(Planned)
115kV lines
Meets minimum requirements
The Chatham -Siler City site is located on Zion Church Road, approximately three miles northwest of Siler
City in Chatham County and comprises approximately 2,879 acres. Existing infrastructure on the site includes
direct access to rail, availability of natural gas, a water capacity of 4+MGD and wastewater treatment capacity
of 4+ MGD, and 230 kV lines that crosses the property. Existing rail spurs, owned by Southern Railroad, are
located along the eastern boundary as well as transect the center of the site.
This site does not meet the full build out requirements for the proposed industry. In addition to a shortage of
power, the quality of power at the Site is negatively impacted by the presence of the existing rail line directly
adjacent to the Site. The vibrations caused by the railroad could significantly impact the operations of the
facility. As described above, the semiconductor chip plants are extremely sensitive and are vulnerable to
power disruption.
A semiconductor chip manufacturing plant at the Chatham Siler City site would put extreme stress on the
area's current water supply. Approximately 4 MGD is currently available to the Chatham Siler City site.
Although the Chatham Siler City site currently has enough water capacity to meet the full build out
requirements of the proposed project, there would not be any additional water capacity available.
Finally, Chatham County is not currently classified as a Tier 1 County and does not meet the entirety of the
stated purpose and need for the proposed project. According to the 2018 Tier Designations for North
Carolina, Chatham County is currently listed as a Tier 3 County (NCDOC, 2.018). A Tier 3 County is defined as
the least distressed in the State.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
17 of 27

5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleiqh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
The Greensboro Randolph Site is located on US 421, approximately 3 miles northwest of Liberty in Randolph
County and comprises approximately 2,000 acres. Available infrastructure at the Site includes direct access to
rail, availability of natural gas, a 115 W line, approximately 5.47 MGD of water capacity and 2.16 MGD of
wastewater capacity. Existing rail lines and multiple rail spurs, owned by Southern Railroad, are located along
the northern boundary as well as in the interior of the site.
The Greensboro Randolph site does not currently meet the minimum energy requirements for the proposed
industry. In addition to the Chatham Siler City site, the close proximity of this site to the railroad could
significantly impact the operations of the proposed facility due to the vibrations caused by the railroad.
Therefore, this alternative was determined impracticable for the proposed development.
Furthermore, the Greensboro Randolph County site is not currently classified as a Tier 1 County and does not
meet the entirety of the stated purpose and need for the proposed project. According to the 2018 Tier
Designations for North Carolina, Randolph and Guilford County are currently listed as a Tier 2 Counties
(NCDOC, 2018).
The Moncure Mega Site encompasses approximately 2,568 acres and is located at the intersection of Old US 1
and Corinth Road, southeast of Moncure in Chatham County, North Carolina. Available infrastructure at the
Site includes direct access to rail, availability of natural gas, 3MGD water capacity and 12 MGD of wastewater
capacity. Planned service at the site includes 115 W lines. Rail lines and rail spurs, currently owned by
Southern Railroad, transect the center of the Site.
The Moncure Mega Site does not currently meet the minimum energy requirements for the proposed industry.
Furthermore, based on conversations with Duke Energy representatives, the existing transmission lines would
have to be relocated and extended in order to accommodate the proposed development. The average cost of
relocations and extensions of transmission lines averages 1 million dollars per mile. Therefore, the significant
cost associated with improving the critical electrical infrastructure necessary for the proposed development
reduces the feasibility of this site as a viable alternative. Furthermore, the the close proximity of this site to the
railroad could significantly impact the operations of the proposed facility due to the vibrations caused by the
railroad.
Finally, Chatham County is not currently classified as a Tier 1 County and does not meet the entirety of the
stated purpose and need for the proposed project. According to the 2018 Tier Designations for North
Carolina, Chatham County is currently listed as a Tier 3 County (NCDOC, 2018). Therefore, the development of
this site for the proposed project would not meet the entirety of the stated purpose and need.
5.3 On -Site Alternatives
The conceptual site design of the Project incorporates the development needs and patterns for a
semiconductor manufacturing chip plant and is based on existing foundry layouts including the
GlobalFoundries facility in Malta, New York. The optimal layout for a semiconductor chip manufacturing plant
incorporates all elements of production contiguous to one another and arranged in the most efficient manner
for maximum efficiency and cost benefits.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
18 of 27

5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleiah, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
To provide an optimal facility layout that is arranged in the most efficient manner, numerous on-site layouts
were examined to locate the central facility in a manner that avoids and minimizes impacts to environmentally
sensitive areas to the maximum extent practicable while meeting the development needs of the industry.
Ultimately, three optional central operations facility layouts were examined to determine the least
environmentally damaging practicable alternative (LEDPA) while meeting the needs of the proposed
development. The three alternatives considered are shown on figures included as Appendix E.
Option 1, the preferred alternative, is located south of Edwin Robertson Road, in the central portion of the
site. This option was designed along an existing ridgeline in order to minimize impacts to streams and
wetlands, avoid all impacts to the 100 -year floodplain and avoids encroaching on the existing utility easement.
Option 1 results in the least overall impacts to Waters of the U.S. including approximately 4,242 linear feet of
permanent impact to streams and 0.1 acres of permanent impacts to wetlands. Furthermore, this option would
require the least amount of cut and fill based on the existing percent slope and the least amount of rock
removal. This layout option provides sufficient area to construct the approximately 3.5 million square feet
central operations facility, while maintaining a suitable property setback from adjacent properties. In addition,
this option allows for multiple points of access to the central operations facility.
Option 2 is located in the southeastern most corner of the site. This option avoids all wetland impacts and
impacts to the 100 -year floodplain. Stream impacts, however, would be unavoidable with this option and
would likely result in approximately 4,885 linear feet of permanent impacts. In addition, this option does not
encroach on the existing utility easement and would not require any utility relocation. However, this site
would only be accessible by a single point of access. This option would result in significant grading challenges
based on the existing percent slope. In addition, Option 2 borders the southeastern site boundary and does not
allow for any adjacent property setbacks.
Option 3 is located in the northernmost portion of the site. Due to the percent slope in this area, a significant
amount of cut and fill would likely be required and would require fill into the 100 -year floodplain as well as
the large wetland and stream complex associated with Story's Creek. Unavoidable impacts to Waters of the
U.S. that would result from this option likely include approximately 4,465 linear feet of permanent stream
impact and approximately 1.5 acres of permanent wetland impacts. This site would only be accessible by a
single point of access. In addition, greater impacts to Waters of the U.S. would likely result from the required
utilities (water, fiber, natural gas) that would have to be extended from the southern boundary to the
northernmost portion of the site. Option 3 borders the northeastern site boundary and does not allow for any
adjacent property setbacks.
The selected alternative, the LEDPA, was determined to meet the size requirements of the proposed facility,
resulted in the least amount of impacts to Waters of the U.S., and provided for multiple points of access to the
property. Table 2 below lays out the primary site considerations evaluated for all on-site alternatives during
design.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING ( GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
19 of 27

TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
Raleiqh, NC 27607
Table 2: Primary Matrix Criteria Evaluated During Design for Preferential On -Site Layout
OPTION 1(PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE)
Total Waters of the U.S. Impacts (Acres)
0.5
• Stream Impacts (Linear Feet)
4,242
• Wetland Impacts (Acres)
0.1
Avoids FEMA 100 -Year Floodplain Impacts
Yes
Multiple Access Points
Yes
Close Proximity to Power to Ensure Un -interruption
Yes
Sufficient Adjacent Property Setbacks
Yes
OPTION 2
Total Waters of the U.S. Impacts (Acres)
0.5
• Stream Impacts (Linear Feet)
4,885
• Wetland Impacts (Acres)
0
Avoids FEMA 100 -Year Floodplain Impacts
Yes
Multiple Access Points
No
Close Proximity to Power to Ensure Un -interruption
Yes
Sufficient Adjacent Property Setbacks
No
OPTION 3
Total Waters of the U.S. Impacts (Acres)
2
• Stream Impacts (Linear Feet)
4,465
• Wetland Impacts (Acres)
1.5
Avoids FEMA 100 -Year Floodplain Impacts
No
Multiple Access Points
No
Close Proximity to Power to Ensure Un -interruption
No
Sufficient Adjacent Property Setbacks
No
5.4 Preferred Alternative
It is rare that a single site meets all the criteria necessary for the successful development of a semiconductor
manufacturing chip plant. Power requirements for a semiconductor manufacturing chip plant are significant.
According to Duke Energy Carolinas representatives, the existing availability of power sets the Person County
Mega Park apart from alternative locations, not only in North Carolina, but also globally. Currently the
proposed Mega Park is served by a 2,422 Megawatt Steam Plant, a 729 Megawatt Steam Plant, a 49 Megawatt
Combined Cycle Plant and 230 W lines and 115 W lines that cross the property. A justification letter from
Duke Energy has been provided in Appendix J and further explains how the amount and quality of available
power in addition to the amount of available water, wastewater, natural gas and telecom further sets this
property apart.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GTS ( LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
20 of 27

000 0
i 5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleiqh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
Person County has identified the proposed Mega Park as an economic development priority and has invested
significant resources into the planning and due -diligence required to develop the Mega Park. The County has
incorporated concerns of relevant stakeholders into their master plan and studied the development needs and
patterns of the industrial clients it wishes to attract.
The criteria evaluated during site selection for this type of facility is extensive. CH2M Hill, a nationally
recognized site consultant firm, evaluated criteria specific to the industry for the Person County Mega Park and
a copy of the Selection Criteria Matrix has been included in Appendix L. The Selection Criteria Matrix
considered 60 criteria factors and project specific requirements related to the industry so that a score could be
assigned. The score was weighted based on how important the criteria and/or requirement is to the industry.
A score of 10 was considered extremely significant and important; while, a score of 2 was considered not
significant and not important. The weighted optimal sum will change by project based on the criteria assessed.
Generally, the scores are based on the circumstances that existed 2 years ago and now the scores for the
Person County Mega Park would be considered higher, based on information from CH2M representative,
Richard Sheehy.
The site selection matrix requirements used in the Selection Criteria Matrix (Appendix L) can be grouped into
5 general categories, and they are: Location, Site Characteristics, Infrastructure, Financials, and Incentives.
Each of these categories were further divided into specific criteria. The specific criteria were assigned an
optimal score based on importance to the industry and the Person County Mega Park was assessed as a
comparison to the optimal score. The Person County Site ranked 356 out of a possible 423 available points
evaluated in the site selection matrix completed by CH2M Hill. Most notable scores for the Person County Mega
Park are within the Site Characteristics and Infrastructure categories. The main section of the property is
relatively square and has additional properties that are adjacent and/or nearby. Therefore, a relatively high
score was assigned to the "shape" criteria and a maximum score was assigned to the "compatible adjacent
uses" criteria since the proposed Mega Park will enhance the ability to attract manufacturers. Extraordinarily
rare for project sites of this magnitude, the Person County Mega Park achieved the maximum score for the
"electricity minimum", "natural gas", and "fiber" criteria, which are extremely important for this industry. Also,
of significant importance for this industry are the "water' and "waste water' criteria, which the Person County
Mega Park scored relatively high. Other notable criteria that the Person County Mega Park scored relatively
high or obtained the maximum number are "regional airport", "access from interstate", "technology
universities", "silicon experienced workforce", "regional electronic managers", "region recruitability", "training
ability", "site zoning", and "adjacent zoning".
Based on information from the Economic Development Partnership of North Carolina (EDP NC), there are
currently three sites, in addition to the preferred alternative, that could be considered for the proposed project
within the State of North Carolina. These include the Chatham -Siler City Megasite, Greensboro -Randolph
Megasite and the Moncure Megasite described above. All three were evaluated as potential off-site alternatives
for the proposed project. As stated above the primary considerations for this type of industry are quality and
quantity of electricity, water and waste -water. Based on a comparison of all four sites, the proposed Project
Site, located within the designated Person County Mega Park, meets the minimum industry requirements
including the quantity and quality of power available to accommodate the proposed development as well as
the other minimum criteria including acreage, water, wastewater, and natural gas.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
21 of 27

•�sss��
s 5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleiqh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
The close proximity of the proposed chip plant at the Person County Mega Park to the 2,422 MW Steam Plant,
729 MW Steam Plant, 49 MW Combined Cycle Steam Plant, 230 kV and 115 kV lines crossing the project site
ensures that a steady stream of high-quality power will always be available to the plant. The current sources of
electricity at the site set it apart from any other alternatives. These sources are capable of meeting large
demands of electric service from multiple directions and provide redundant electric service that enhance the
power quality to a customer which is vital for the semiconductor industry. Per direct communication with
representatives from Duke Energy, the availability of transmission capacities and voltages are a result of the
site's close proximity to the Roxboro Steam Station as well as multiple 230 kV and 115 kV transmission lines
are already present at the site.
In addition, the proximity to power and the surrounding land use further ensures that power to the site will
not experience interruption. As stated above, power disruptions can render the site inoperable and possible
sources of power interruption are of significant concern when evaluating a sites suitability. Lands surrounding
the proposed Project Site are primarily agricultural or forested and do not, therefore, allow activities that
would disrupt the flow of power to the site. The close proximity of the proposed facility further ensures that no
power disruptions will occur along the lines prior to arriving at the site. The alternative Mega Parks that were
evaluated for the project are directly adjacent to active rail lines which results in vibrations that could cause
power interruptions and is considered a significant drawback for this type of development that relies heavily
on a steady stream of uninterrupted power.
In addition to power, this type of industry also has significant water and wastewater requirements. As shown
on the table below, water requirements begin at 1 million gallons per day (MGD) to 4MGD once site has
reached its full production capacity. The areas water excess capacity is 5MGD and wastewater excess capacity
is 3MGD. This will allow enough water to serve the Site as well as additional capacity. The location will be
serviced by PSNC Energy with an 8" pipeline operating at 150-350 PSI. The pipeline capacity is 32,000 MCF per
month. The proposed Person County Mega Park has a robust fiber network in place. Multiple providers nearby
can ensure fiber redundancy.
6.0 JURISDICTIONAL IMPACTS
To accomplish the goals of the Project, the Applicant has proposed the Preferred Alternative as the Least
Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA), as the least impactful action to jurisdictional
areas when compared to other alternatives. To accomplish the goals of the Project, impacts to jurisdictional
Waters of the U.S. are unavoidable. The location of impacts to jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. identified within
the Project limits are shown on the attached Impact Maps (Appendix D: Person County Mega Park -
jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. Impacts Maps - Sheets 1-7).
Based on the proposed park layout approximately 10,529 linear feet of stream and 1.94 acres of wetland will
be permanently impacted by the proposed project. No temporary impacts are proposed. Impacts will result
from the required grading and proposed road crossings. The current proposed layout provides sufficient area
to construct the approximately 3.5 million square feet facility as well as position the facility along the existing
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ( CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
22 of 27

5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleiqh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
ridgeline which will serve to minimize impacts to 2nd order streams. Fill slopes will be graded to 3:1 slopes and
will be hydroseeded and matted to stabilize. Modular block retaining walls will be utilized to minimize limits of
disturbance and balance earthwork where feasible.
Storm runoff from the proposed park will be managed and treated and ultimately directed into off-site waters.
Therefore, the drainage area of the receiving waters located off-site will not be reduced. The project will meet
all relative requirements of Best Management Practices and Engineered Stormwater Control Structures as
outlined through State and Local Stormwater Rules. Stormwater management on-site will managed and
treated before discharging into down gradient waters in order to protect waters from degradation. Therefore,
the project should have no effect on downstream waters, shellfish or other aquatic species. Rip -rap dissipater
pads that will be installed flush with the existing grade of the stream bed to allow for aquatic life passage (see
Appendix C for Typical Plan, Profile, and Cross Sectional Views).
7.0 AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
Impacts to jurisdictional features were avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable by
incorporating resourceful site planning, including the utilization of the wetland delineation to adjust the layout
to avoid and minimize impacts. After the wetlands were delineated, an engineering plan was developed to
meet all needs at the proposed Mega Park, while minimizing impacts to Waters of the U.S.
Based on extensive analysis of on-site alternatives of the location of the central facility, the proposed location
results in the least impacts to Waters of the U.S. while meeting the needs of the industry. Alternative siting
locations for the central operations facility are limited based on the size and layout requirements. The current
proposed layout provides sufficient area to construct the approximately 3.5 million square feet facility as well
as position the facility along the existing ridgeline which will serve to minimize impacts to 2nd order streams.
Fill slopes will be graded to 3:1 slopes and will be hydroseeded and matted to stabilize. Modular block
retaining walls will be utilized to minimize limits of disturbance and balance earthwork where feasible. The
building was strategically placed to maximize buildable area on the proposed Mega Park in regard to building
shape and size, location, access, functionality and circulation.
Dissipator pads associated with each culvert will be installed flush with the existing grade of the streambed to
allow for aquatic life passage. Measures will be taken to prevent oil, tar, trash, debris and other pollutants from
entering the adjacent jurisdictional streams and wetlands. Any excess excavated materials not utilized as back
fill will be placed and contained within upland areas and permanently stabilized to prevent erosion into
adjacent jurisdictional streams and wetlands. Therefore, stockpiling of excavated material within jurisdictional
streams and wetlands will be strictly prohibited as part of the construction of this project. All project
construction activities initiated within jurisdictional streams and wetlands will be carried to completion in an
expeditious manner in order to minimize the period of disturbance within the jurisdictional streams and
wetlands.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONII1ENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
23 of 27

5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 mmlimmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
The proposed Project has minimized the possibility of secondary impacts through implementation of planning
practices which reduce the influence of direct impacts on downstream water quality. A full Secondary and
Cumulative Impact Analysis has been included as Appendix K. Efforts to reduce impacts generally include:
1. Avoidance/minimization of direct wetlands/waters impacts through innovative site planning and
utilization of confirmed wetland delineation
2. Minimization of partial wetland/stream impacts
3. Minimization of impacts to primary drainage ways and floodplains
4. Strict adherence to all state and local stormwater and sediment control measures
An Erosion and Sediment Control (E&S) Plan that meets the latest State and local regulations and adheres to
the methodology prescribed in the North Carolina Sedimentation and Pollution Control Act of 1973 will be
utilized. All erosion and sediment control measures will be checked for stability and operation following every
runoff producing rainfall, but in no case less than once every week. Any needed repairs will be made
immediately to maintain all measures designed. The project will meet all relative requirements of Best
Management Practices and Engineered Stormwater Control Structures as outlined through State and Local
Stormwater Rules. Stormwater management facilities have been strategically placed adjacent to streams
within natural drainageways to manage and treat runoff before discharging into down gradient waters in
order to protect waters from degradation. Therefore, the project should have no effect on downstream waters,
shellfish or other aquatic species (see Appendix C for Typical Plan, Profile, and Cross Sectional Views).
8.0 COMPENSATORY MITIGATION
Due to the absence of private mitigation banks in the area, compensatory mitigation for these unavoidable
impacts will be achieved through payment into the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) in -lieu
fund. A conditional letter of approval has been provided by DMS for the necessary credits. Based on the
response from DMS, they currently have most of the credits needed in the 03010104 HUC. However, should
that change at the time payment is made, DMS may need to utilize adjacent HUCs to fill the need. This would be
contingent on regulatory approval. Because of the rural nature of the Roanoke watershed and the lack of
demand for mitigation within this watershed, the North Carolina Interagency Review Team identified the
neighboring HUCs, within the Roanoke watershed, as additional opportunities for mitigation. The mitigation is
proposed to take place in one following HUC's Roanoke 03010103, 03010104 or 03010102. A copy of the
correspondence from DMS as well as the conditional acceptance letter from DMS is included as Appendix I.
Person County Business and Industrial Center, Inc. (PCBIC) believes and supports the concept of a strong
mitigation product that can accurately replace lost functions associated with the proposed project. PCBIC also
believes in the concept of being active in the development of multiple mitigation options that provide both the
environmental improvement and public value improvement for Person County residents. Therefore, PCBIC
will explore several mitigation options as part of the permitting process. Payment to the NC Division of
Mitigation Services (NCDMS) will be an option; however, flexibility to explore other mitigation opportunities
CIVILENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I G[S ( LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
24 of 27

•��ls�i
5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
that can better serve the public and environment will be incorporated into the final mitigation package
proposed for the project. Other opportunities will allow the county to pursue projects that directly benefit
Person County and allow for potential mitigation to occur in close proximity to the impact site. The county will
use a collaborative watershed planning process to incorporate and solicit input directly from affected
stakeholders in developing a mitigation plan. Planning efforts will identify and prioritize aquatic resource
restoration, establishment, and enhancement activities, and preservation of existing aquatic resources that are
important for maintaining or improving ecological functions of the watershed within Person County.
9.0 SUPPORTING SITE INFORMATION
9.1 Threatened and Endangered Species Information
An Endangered Species Project Review was conducted to gain insight regarding the potential presence of
Endangered Species Act (ESA) listed species within or in the vicinity of the Project. The following agencies and
associated databases were reviewed:
• U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services (USFWS) - Information, Planning and Consultations Systems (IPaC)
• North Carolina Natural Heritage Department (NHP) database
Based upon a review of available information, one (1) federally protected species is currently listed by USFWS
for Person County. The dwarf -wedge mussel (Alasmidonta heterodon) is currently listed as endangered on the
Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal Species of Concern, and Candidate Species list for Person
County (dated 12-27-2012). There is no critical habitat identified for this species within the project area based
on results from the IPaC database search.
Furthermore, USFWS issued a scoping response letter on July 11, 2014 that stated that the proposed action is
not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed endangered or threatened species, their formally designated
critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act at the property and all requirements of
section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied. A copy of the scoping response letters has been included in
Appendix F - Agency Correspondence.
9.2 Cultural Resources
A query of the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) database was performed for the
Project and the vicinity (0.25 miles from the project boundary) to determine the effect, if any, that the project.
No National Register sites or sites Eligible for listing in the National Register are present on the property or
within 0.25 miles of the property.
In addition, an archaeological survey was completed by Archaeological Consultants of the Carolinas (ACC) in
July 2017. Twelve (12) archaeological resources were identified during the course of this investigation. None
CIVIL ENGINEERING ( ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE i CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
25 of 27

•�ssss�
5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
of the 12 resources identified were considered to retain research potential beyond the survey level of
investigation and have recommend not eligible for the National Register. A concurrence letter from the State
Historic Preservation Office was received on September 15, 2017. A copy of the letter has been included in
Appendix F- Agency Coordination.
10.0 CONCLUSIONS
The Person County Business and Industrial Center, Inc. (Applicant) proposes the development of a
semiconductor chip manufacturing plant at the Person County Mega Park (Project). The purpose of the Project
is to develop the semiconductor chip manufacturing plant to bring significant economic relief to the citizens of
Person County, one of the most economically distressed counties in North Carolina. The Project is located
approximately 5 miles north of Roxboro in Person County, North Carolina. For the purpose of this permit
application, the Project also includes an approximately 100 -foot corridor along Edwin Robertson Road and
Shiloh Church Road for transportation improvements as well as areas within the right of way along McGhees
Road and Chub Lake Road to be utilized for utility installations.
The close proximity of the Project to the 2,422 MW Steam Plant, 729 MW Steam Plant, 49 MW Combined Cycle
Steam Plant as well as the multiple 230 kV and 115 kV transmission lines that cross the Project site ensure that
a steady stream of high-quality power will always be available to the plant. In addition, the lack of vibration
sources (i.e. rail) further ensures that the plant will not experience power interruption which is extremely
detrimental to the fabrication process. The area's water excess capacity further differentiates the Project as the
current water excess capacity exceeds the industries' full build out requirements.
Person County has identified the Project as an economic priority. The Project will serve to bring significant
economic relief to the citizens of Person County. The N.C. Department of Commerce's 2017 report indicates a
19% unemployment rate in Person County and designates it as a Tier 1 County, one of the most distressed
counties in the state. Based on an economic study for the Project, the annual employment impact of the new
facility will result in approximately 7,870 new jobs in Person County.
The Person County Business and Industrial Center, Inc. completed all the due -diligence necessary to in order to
facilitate an expedient approval process. Due -diligence completed to date includes a Phase I Environmental
Site Assessment, geotechnical study, wetland and stream investigations, historic and cultural resource surveys,
threatened and endangered species surveys, a traffic impact analysis, and an economic impact assessment. In
addition, on-site concurrence meetings have been held with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and N.C. Division
of Water Resources.
The Project includes the development of an approximate 3.5 million square feet central operations facility to
house the clean room, cooling towers, waste water treatment facilities, office space, associated parking, and
vehicular load deck areas. Necessary roadway improvements identified in the NCDOT approved Traffic Impact
Analysis are expected to be completed in two phases and include the construction of a circular roadway
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
26 of 27

5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.wm
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
around the perimeter of the facility as well as widening and intersection improvements along Edwin
Robertson Road and Shiloh Church Road.
To accomplish the goals of the Project, the Applicant has proposed the Preferred Alternative as the Least
Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA). Multiple off-site alternatives were analyzed for
the Project. The Person County site was determined to best meet the Project purpose based on the quantity
and quality of electricity, the amount of excess water and wastewater capacity, the lack of vibration sources
(i.e. rail) that could disrupt power distribution and the economic relief it will bring to the citizens of Person
County.
Furthermore, numerous on-site alternatives were analyzed to identify the most efficient manner to avoid and
minimize impacts to environmentally sensitive features. Based on the proposed Project layout and associated
roadway and utility improvements, approximately 10,529 linear feet of stream and 1.94 acres of wetland will
be impacted by the proposed project. These unavoidable impacts will be mitigated through the purchase of
compensatory wetland and stream credits through the N.0 Division of Mitigation Services (DMS), ensuring a
"no net loss" of aquatic resource function and value to Waters of the U.S. In addition, the Applicant will
continue to explore other mitigation opportunities that can better serve the public and environment will be
incorporated into the final mitigation package proposed for the project.
The purpose of the proposed project is to develop a semiconductor chip manufacturing plant at the Person
County Mega Park and bring significant economic relief to the citizens of Person County. The proposed Project
includes the development of a 3.5 million square feet facility as well as the associated roadway improvements
and utility installation. The selected LEDPA meets the needs of the semiconductor industry, results in the least
impacts to sensitive environmental resources and will significantly benefit the citizens of Person County.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
27 of 27

APPENDIX A
PERMIT APPLICATION

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
OMB APPROVAL 003
EXPIRES: 28 FEBRUARY20 20133
33 CFR 325. The proponent agency is CECW-CO-R.
Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to average 11 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect of the collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense,
Washington Headquarters, Executive Services and Communications Directorate, Information Management Division and to the Office of Management and
Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be
subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please DO NOT
RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of
the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries
Act, Section 103, 33 USC 1413; Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers; Final Rule 33 CFR 320-332. Principal Purpose: Information provided on
this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other
federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by Federal law. Submission
of requested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit be issued. One set
of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this application (see
sample drawings and/or instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An application
that is not completed in full will be returned.
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO.
2. FIELD OFFICE CODE
3. DATE RECEIVED
4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETE
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BY APPLICANT)
5 APPLICANT'S NAME
8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (agent is not required)
First - David Middle - Last - Newell
First -Anna Middle - Last -Reusche
Company - Person County Business and Industrial Center
Company - Timmons Group
E-mail Address - [e-mail]
E-mail Address - [e-mail]
6. APPLICANTS ADDRESS:
9. AGENT'S ADDRESS:
Address- PO Box 1824
Address- 5410 Trinity
City - Roxboro State - NC Zip -27573 Country - USA
City - Raleigh State -NC Zip -27607 Country -USA
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOs. w/AREA CODE
10. AGENTS PHONE NOs. w/AREA CODE
a. Residence b. Business c. Fax
a. Residence b. Business c. Fax
919-866-4500
33Co. S TT
STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
11. 1 hereby authorize, Timmons Group to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request,
supplemental information in support of this permit application.
j
.tel
���c^cG/ �iSVC ' `7� 2- C)
IGNATU E OF APPLICANT DATE
NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
11. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
Person County Business and Industrial Center
12. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable)
14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
Story's and Marlowe Creek
Address Country Club Road
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
City - Roxboro State- NC Zip -27574
Latitude: 'N 36.4779 Longitude: -W -78.9941
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions)
State Tax Parcel ID Municipality
Section - Township - Range-

17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
From Wake Forest office take NC Highway 98 to US 501 North. Stay on 501 North until the intersection of Chub Lake and Country Club
Road. Continue on Country Club Road to the intersection of Edwin Robertson Road.
18. Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all features)
The proposed project includes the development of a semiconductor chip manufacturing plant as well as associated roadway and utility improvements. The proposed layou
includes a 3.5 million square feet central operations facility to house a clean room, cooling towers, wastewater treatment facilities, office space, parking and vehicular loading
decks. Roadway improvements are proposed along Edwin Robertson Road/Shiloh Church Road and Country Club Road. The proposed design also identifies locations and size
for stormwater control measures to be installed as part of the proposed project. For the purpose of this permit application, the Project Site also includes an approximate 100
-
foot corridor along Edwin Robertson and Shiloh Church Roads as well as corridors for both the proposed water line and natural gas line, intended to serve the site. No impact
are anticipated for either utility, as they will occur within the existing right of way of Chub Lake Road and McGhee Mill Road.
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions)
The purpose of the proposed project is to develop the Person County Business and Industrial Park to accommodate a semiconductor
fabrication chip plant which will serve to bring significant economic relief to the citizens of Person County.
USE BLOCKS 20-23 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
In order to accomplish the goals of the Project, at total of 1.94 acres of unavoidable permanent impacts to jurisdictional wetlands and 10,52
linear feet of stream are required. Discharge into special aquatic sites will result from the development of building pads, parking areas,
roadway improvements and new road locations. All fill material utilized for the project will be free of contaminants brought only from local
sources.
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards:
Type Type Type
Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions)
Acres 1.94 wetland
or
Linear Feet 10.529 stream
23. Description of Avoidance, Minimization, and Compensation (see instructions) Please refer to attached permit support document Sections 6, 7,
and 8.
ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 Page 2 of 3

24 Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete.' F7 Yes GX'No IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
25 Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc , Whose Property Adjoins the W aterbody ,a more than can be entered here urease attach a supplemental lis()
a. Address -See attached list
City - State - Zip -
b. Address -
City - State - Zip -
c.Address-
City - State - Zip -
d. Address -
City - State Zip -
e. Address -
City - State - Zip -
` Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building, and flood plain permits
27 Application is hereby made for permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application I certify that this information in this application is
complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the
applicant .n
/V • 'L � G'irfi�' / V .� /GY Y 1 i' i L - t ��/�^��/ `� I 3 %
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The Application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the Jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfuiiy falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trck, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false'vriting or document knowing sarne to contain any false, fictitious or
Fraudulent statements or entry, shaft be fined rot more than $' 0.000 ur imprisoned not more than five years or both.
ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 Page 3 of 3

OWNER NAME SITE ADDRESS MAILINGADDRESS CITY STOTF 710 rnnF
BROWN CYNTHIA D
1431 COUNTRY CLUB RD
PO BOX 3176
ROXBORO
- -- ---
NC
--- ----
27573
ALKINS GEORGE W
1459 COUNTRY CLUB RD
1459 COUNTRY CLUB RD
ROXBORO
NC
27574
MARTIN ROY & DIANE L
1542 EDWIN ROBERTSON RE
1542 EDWIN ROBERTSON RD
ROXBORO
NC
27574
WILKERSON DERRICK L
2072 EDWIN ROBERTSON RE
2072 EDWIN ROBERTSON RD
ROXBORO
NC
27574
CLAYTON JANIE C & OTHERS
EDWIN ROBERTSON RD
424 ROY CARVER RD
SEMORA
NC
27343
CLAYTON TIMOTHY NORRIS
1625 COUNTRY CLUB RD
1625 COUNTRY CLUB RD
ROXBORO
NC
27574
REAVES FRANKIE LEE
1925 EDWIN ROBERTSON RE
9014 MCGHEES MILL RD
SEMORA
NC
27343
WAGSTAFF LINDSAY III & JOHN H
EDWIN ROBERTSON RD
31 REAMS AVE
ROXBORO
NC
27573
EGGLESTON JAMES J & EGGLESTON
1601 COUNTRY CLUB RD
1601 COUNTRY CLUB RD
ROXBORO
NC
27574
JACKSON W LOGAN JR
COUNTRY CLUB RD
14 KENT PARK CIR
WINSTON SALEM
NC
27106
BOWES TIMOTHY W & CINDY K
710 OAK GROVE RD
710 OAK GROVE RD
ROXBORO
NC
27574
JAMES JOHN J & JULIA
1481 COUNTRY CLUB RD
PO BOX 1051
ROXBORO
NC
27573
JAMES JOHN J & JULIA
COUNTRY CLUB RD
PO BOX 1051
ROXBORO
NC
27573
JAY CHARLIE ESTATE
CHARLIE JAY RD
2222 DICKINSON ST
PHILADELPHIA
PA
19146
WILLIAMS ANN G
OAK GROVE RD
433 CONCORD CHURCH RD
ROXBORO
NC
27574
WAGSTAFF LINDSAY JR/JOHN & OTH
EDWIN ROBERTSON RD
31 REAMS AVE
ROXBORO
NC
27573
WOODSDALE HUNTING CLUB
EDWIN ROBERTSON RD
1525 CAVEL CHUB LAKE RD
ROXBORO
NC
27574
FOX RANDALL TODD & DIANE E
1870 EDWIN ROBERTSON RE
1870 EDWIN ROBERTSON RD
ROXBORO
NC
27574
JAMES JOHN J & JULIA A
COUNTRY CLUB RD
PO BOX 1051
ROXBORO
NC
27573
HOBBS FREDERICK E JR & PAMELIA
1296 COUNTRY CLUB RD
1296 COUNTRY CLUB RD
ROXBORO
NC
27574
HUNT JOSEPH P & CHERYL S
EDWIN ROBERTSON RD
PO BOX 1756
WAKE FOREST
NC
27588
WARREN R T COMPANY INC
EDWIN ROBERTSON RD
2941 CHUB LAKE RD
ROXBORO
NC
27574
REAVES FRANKIE LEE
1967 EDWIN ROBERTSON RE
9014 MCGHEES MILL RD
SEMORA
NC
27343
WOODSDALE HUNTING CLUB
EDWIN ROBERTSON RD
1525 CAVEL CHUB LAKE RD
ROXBORO
NC
27574
HUNT JOSEPH P & CHERYL S
EDWIN ROBERTSON RD
PO BOX 1756
WAKE FOREST
NC
27588
BROWN CYNTHIA DIANE
COUNTRY CLUB RD
PO BOX 3176
ROXBORO
NC
27573
CLAYTON DWAYNE A & DEBRA C
OAK GROVE RD
712 OAK GROVE RD
ROXBORO
NC
27574
BOWES BRODIE WAYNE & BETTY J
OAK GROVE RD
849 OAK GROVE RD
ROXBORO
NC
27574
REAVES WELDON T
1950 COUNTRY CLUB RD
1950 COUNTRY CLUB RD
ROXBORO
NC
27574
FOX RANDALL T & DIANE E
EDWIN ROBERTSON RD
1870 EDWIN ROBERTSON RD
ROXBORO
NC
27574
ETREE LLC
EDWIN ROBERTSON RD
PO BOX 850
BURLINGTON
NC
27216
FOX RANDALL TODD & DIANE E
EDWIN ROBERTSON RD
1870 EDWIN ROBERTSON RD,
ROXBORO
INC
27574

ETREE LLC
EDWIN ROBERTSON RD
PO BOX 850
BURLINGTON
NC
27216
PHELPS CHRISTOPHER R & AMANDA
COUNTRY CLUB RD
1160 COUNTRY CLUB RD
ROXBORO
NC
27574
WATKINS GEOFFREY PATRICK
COUNTRY CLUB RD
PO BOX 231
SEMORA
NC
27343
ETREE LLC
EDWIN ROBERTSON RD
PO BOX 850
BURLINGTON
NC
27216

APPENDIX B
FIGURES

ratn: Baa-raoczirwrrol\tsuo\saa[a t-erson 1-ounry MegazDI[ewiz touommon onarea tmoitstupmea wan wwm ana gaswaaza-vll._Mtv_VVMJ_u/ I izu-Immxa
limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP

ram: K:usuotaaaza rerson uounry megawmi.3iawommon anarec txnioi[strerson_t ounry_rHKL t-L.mxa
limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written wnsent of TIMMON5 GROUP

x
E
ro
0
N
O
N
>I
W
I
W
T
C
0
O
U
I
0
O
N
a
N
m
O1
C
m
a
3
L
3
v
a�
m
v
CL
N
4
L
X
W
U
O
m
L
GO
c
O
E
E
O
U
U
d
U7
m
rn
a�
T
C
0
O
U
c
0
N
N
a
N
Cl)
R
C7
0
O
co
fy

c
O
E
E
O
U
U'
'm
(n
a
rn
Q)
2
T
C
0
O
U
c
0
m
n�
a
rn
N
co
Cif
So
O
of

Legend
Project Study Limits - 1,456.4 Acres
Unconfirmed Intermittent Stream
Unconfirmed Perennial Stream
Unconfirmed Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
Confirmed Delineated Stream (2017)
- Confirmed Delineated Pond (2017)
Confirmed Delineated Wetland (2017)
NOTES
1. WATERS OF THE U.S. WITHIN THE PROJECT STUDY
LIMITS HAVE BEEN GPS LOCATED BY TIMMONS GROUP.
2. ALL WATERS OF THE U.S. HAVE NOT BEEN CONFIRMED
BY THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
3. PROJECT STUDY LIMITS ARE APPROXIMATE.
4. AERIAL IMAGERY IS BASED ON ESRI ONLINE 2012.
5. COWARDIN STREAM CLASSIFICATIONS ARE BASED
SOLELY ON FIELD OBSERVATIONS. NO FORMAL STREAM
ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY WAS COMPLETED TO
DETERMINE THESE COWARDIN CLASSIFICATIONS.
IN"
3,000 6,00
Feet'

APPENDIX C
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS

tl- JN .. I- i .."". - i i""VII'^ ., .,. w w,Vw
,q poen o9 I.. IID4s pw lmd N /D op" 41 p.-lxo,dol p 1(w .TDw pw drKIND SNOIICILL /D AIA60A anlonpn 641 a sllwwn=p polcil-D p- sl+Dld -41
:d 11 3 Wild IO'diNOJ NOISOi83 �,
a :' g _ = _ _ VNIlOT1VJ NlT10N 'A1Nf10J NOSN3d i . I
NOIidI1,JS3O NOISIA91, 31Vo ° o ° m o m = m Q �lIS-b'J�W AiNnOD NOS"d9d I "' in
A6o�ouyoa1 ainpnuasei;uI dei;uappe)i ;uawdo� ea "S
--ti oW -Hail E99S'6S8'6I6 XVd TS66'998'6T6131
C09C[7N'461a33UJO NOI3WH NWHi 0165 'SLf10 N9f1021H103A3IHJtl NOSSIA Nf10A ••0 • �0 •• dnomo S
Ni IV 0311Vd311d VNIMVtlO SIH,,
%Tllllq�� -.11" ----- - - - - -.. ,------ - - -------. - ,ii,* I �, � ; ; ,,,,�
V ---- - ­- , - - -,- . �- *% - ,,, ;,� I " ,
-- - - ­ 1, �'11, --,.- - , � , -1, -
I � I" . , - 1:1"`,-:z11-, tf-111111W , " - t -
1 h,
_ _
i -- '� )
'- -
11,
-��6 11 11 I 11 ::- : z --- 4- &
.--- !
11 I
\\\\, / - . <„t,.,,- -e_- --; _. -_ , ,.11',1 (i f'n,la(r =: ll7llY
-------
,'/ 1
--_____---_.----__ 1,i �1; i111,�.%iii_' _
______ Ir/ll i _ _ _
fi;'.-----------
_ - -_ lil Illi;• __ _- _
C\7. ---1-1111
-
.: - I�,�..�', , --- -1-11
- �pq�, ;�;`
!' i /
',,'�---�
\ \♦ ':i`
`/",� --I--
✓+N1:'`II. ',111;
I% ,
itf
\i \
1.
I
d'
:il",
�'
i1`: ,'
a;,,';;.
, :I
',
!i', '
N
,'4
1`'
, , �_4
;• ;;
1; i)1 '
:,
,\
1i6- ii fIi% i
111-111\
+� . ___ , ri --_ `_ � _ , I IIII ,
, .r _- _- - _ .`\� _. ...1...1.1 1 ..- ... ,. - _ - •I•.111'I'N l ,
.,
,1
%.i:',
;'
.:%: -
Ilj;
- ll"" - V
%/-\Z-----"
\\\`
-
i! r
;1 nii'
tf ' f ,'
+I
i%;
-;::•;:
Y
Ir
: `/`;111.1.
ji
rr
l N .Il m,
/ 1 - '.+iii:: ��
_ y
..
11
✓ ""
('
ill
X"'
�1
.;'r'`.�;` :mss
I.
,,1'
J
K+T
„
�Ji"F .i
yy +
``
ii
,`) •14• ^
- '�.,,(; tel' '; •1 {';IiiII '�-,
xi ✓
" '1` K K I' •'yam
11,
\;, y , I
1.X
!i1
;ii+t
,. %;;'li
Ji%
/;u'•
.'
_ 1�1�,:�1 fir'
` _ '1
j _",
ill
-''
\\ \� - .,/ ",!!!"111",
--\",
11
I �
:, - . I ""I", � "I ) i � !�;`,�`.`.:',
\, +11'1',1,11
� ,
,,,, , ---- � , ,
`'
,\ ___
''
''
'�',x�
'11 - /^
_--_ ->I,, it
1i,. � f 11-i
lill -'-�------,
I - -I--- --
- - 1-1 --
, 1-�, - �� - --:, , ,
I - - ----- - ','I,____:,,:`, 1, I . . --
_ _ ,t`
I1
/ it `lI --, •1-lJltrl �i
. r, L_. 1.
_ ,+1
I
" - 1I
''''' --
no
.
/ -- -1 ; --- %
1 I'-,-,------,---,--',"
/--- _�;_!-.11'.111;., i11',I ;i 1 \11'1\, :;\';•`,
,
pR
: 4
."'
-
rvM
_
II: ---
''.1;; _-
,1 1 -
rl"I,il 'i:1 :1 _
%;.
'.
/v
/,/Aai-
•�,
- - \::
?�__ - . - -
',\' +; -
:l•i
_ _ „yf/,„; •111,'• __--
/..,,,"
%i;Ss+ it -.._
%i •i - - - -- =-
__ _ ___ ____ i i -
/,
_"- --____ ;i%li _-_
u ;l:
'os.'ii;ii � --
i
%s'- _
--- ++,-s:n -
s«.-�
=4r.
i
a ,"" - -
!iiiii i
l",
","I '''' ' ''
---.,'', �
- EB OVN ry
V
�
``\,,,1 ;I t
;1
it i i % r '\ r\i;; :1Lt;{ ;;
. 1 l , `. 1. .,,,,,,
1 „
-' .�\�� '� \+1111
il'
I'I: ;'nliliuu"' Inlu^::'lil'
' l i !illi;,,: i'%f
"� n
\,
r4
- I
li 1• i t
':l! IIII4ID""" t''il
A
1
1 I
'"
ill
i:i is
_ _ ;� iii0.
- ' 1 r 'a'lii'" _
i; '.1 rain^ \+3�°1;,,1„,.:C,;,'.-
' '1%ilii%% �_
:l^
'.;
- klr
''-5%i: _ .
:1\Alni,l ::�:•
%Illi'' ;;;i;;
„'
'illlll' , I II,N''1 il-�.-.t
G;; 4;:
_ - "1''1 Ill\ \
mil,,lir • ) ;
11
o\
- iii: _ -
flliili; ';'1�"
W
,�•11ii ___ ,
%i 1'1 1
i'L"
___ 1•,11 _____
i;Ji
II
:':::
`\
-
F. i,_
s• ,
- - / 'lllllrrllllrlll•••`%;:' - -
- - =_
' i%iiiiiGs �: -
ii
-- _ZN "Illy' 11 /;' 'i Ali =
<? %;
s i_
2. -
_ _ - li{: ter,
P
;,\ -
u;iiiiiir°nii ^r, -- r+a,• -
i`
c:.
- - moi; `--- __
-- - `) \111`1`)
- ) i ,,ill;: „iii• :ll' I
'!))111111+//:,; vi/1 '- - --\' \ ` ' /
,1. ;J.; __ ,_ _
;'i,/
?Il', -
j;'
i� _
11;1 I//��// 'i (il - ---"-' - ,'111(1 ilI 11li
ill/ //
ii(, _ -
Ir%//' ,Ill,/ -'-_ it
g� ;;1 r+ir _ ___ _ __ - -
r
u•M;,', +' 1 1 I - -- `\\\\„ 1111111
:11:1 ,,'111, - ___ _____
",, '"\'�:' r ;ill/ iii.
T'" ` •\\
111
;` - - `pili.
1 -
- ;1'I;;
! ', w." A'., -- _ � i! ; ''111 I„
- - ,•IIII
illl;lll
.Ili; rl"
_ ' 11 1`i;l
,'r Ill/ 111'. '%I"
NM���• --' 1il' 1, i,lr 1 •'•1,`
1'11
_ - '; ;oiiii; ;•i; ,':Ilii,,%r;�ir
__-- -- 'lil ii i j;!ii %ry;
ii;",i!,; 1„ \i\`� - - - ii .;I;;;;;.i„r;,%'•'':;'1
, ,`'..�,"` - ,,;iii 11 il:.�i"";i;... �i';
r!i;i
L•i
n -
N^'
:sz'
I,
j'; - {
v„r';•' �lil'
__ 'r I
i' 1
�q \, - 1111;: ,l ,I' _- .';'k'"'�'�:?:: ::_.:,%
:;+i _
..
'' ;
I, \. - ,y�r ..
"; t c ,.:3
11111 .•:l'i ( / h
:\
11 \l
„\\
;'.'
'1 1 i
l ,'nnyin vry';;
\' ;
:'an _ -%fir' _ r'!ri 'Iii ailt�tiin IvYy�r;i
i'ij'"I, „ji '"1;
-J•/ --- ;, Ii ;iii �',. 1',1'.\': . 'it"",
rililr.;,1„ •rt
�.: ;;1;\1\1\x\`.`,-: • },q;;; ':;i:;i!!:'';:,`\\:�:.`::
- , 1 / ;'*;+1. - '11;;'11111 1111',,,1\, \,.,,.,.
111111''" 11;111\\1'::.
_ ,�, ','` '\1\111, „•`� ';\U\\1\\`'.,�,
�'�f� __ lily itt\::\':jl\�a:,p\,; �.`.
I lr ,IIII �- '�` %. - -
\\
`` _
:illl,l --_----- --
__ ____ __ _ ' , /
'11!11,, !,`_'`,`-_` ,�`, N„'' ; /'r
:�'• - ,loll '`\`,.
__ �'r. y: /iii'; _
i -I
_ _ +
._-; _, _/ oil;;;', �\-"- _- -__
____ 11 •\I ,,I\
_ __
i Y- Jri / K trs, iirF♦l ii - - - -
r� i -r_' _ -
- -
♦
•
/:
i/
r---
�li� 1i1 l iil "' i, -
;1
--
--
i il'I \• i •, ri
it -
{
--
' � ' I I I •
E `'
i
1'i 111•••1
1 i
;i;'• _
!;
- v
�t
I
I;i,/ ---- - iii/"";;'I'll ---- - - -
_ _
o :i. -
'til _ _
y
-j _
.;1
hl'. <\', ,'o0-1
ur 'U\�,,, _ _ .:�,
:,'- -- - -
;q:j
;i;
il
_ /ii:; .
%ilb /^.
'Illi d' ,
v-
11ni ,
i'''iL ;�; r,
:i
-1ia ;,;; 11.1/•1
----` _ IlI�1/Iron:;
iii/ ,'i �'',, ,1:,�
li
.:i ;
'.1
I
- ' ;- „11i',;'; 1';'1'1,''':';'1 ---- '!i.
ilii t
11 -
__ __ _ !%'.111111
I
',Yom' '''i; ` ,? _ `/ .
_ II
itw.
/i r _ 111„�;;i;
/ , i.'/•;
_ i'i;
_ ;ii,'1' _
__ - '1111 . '1;111'', I'lI'
` ii ;I
_ - ,,ifi%/ i % N11",•' '111,•''' ;1` '; ',1
6-• tt11
Il
- I;
.:7,"",;",,;""' ,:"""v
,N ;Il 't;'
` _
%i. _ '\\\\\ ::1 •Ili" t/i' 1 _
'' _ _
riI
;, i 1
,
- 11 ".1i
.II
-- NHf
,I iii%
',11'x;
;r
i•
•'on•i In r v
�•il •/ 11
•P it
i I ;'P,%., 1;;11%ii:r_-;:_'%;'
-- 'Sti; .".t\ '.rr1 Tif"iii! �,.•lrl,;I'::,^-;,',.
`;ilii,,;,,' „l
I ^i%ray'
Y`
tr
1 !,
:I'
- l`
-- ^nut -
- \n ,1
,.rill 1 ,
i
w�
w
Q.
_
6�
Z
I= -•3Z
0 9
6
_
O_
w V'
a600
__ _ __ _ _ _ - __
__ __ _ _____ ____ ___ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1\\� __
`- --____ _-__ ____ _ - - -_
Z
g j
U
�
W
�rc
(9
,r
��
O
_
'-- - "_-'--- _ -- _-
__ __ __ -
-+ZO
=(JZ�
f
13 0
O OJ
9
,�Q�
WW
w W W
r/, K W
6 w
to
W
K
Z U
2 Z
-
Z
-
O
>
rye
q
4
S
g
,1i
o$
8 Sy 0
&
9
N
.
W Z
2
A
2
Ii
- w
W
i
\'1, i
i
ow-
OQ
0.
Y i-
i
w
IoF-Z6i
UNw
14LLIIOz
W
�w�
'd' (iRH
&-
a
I++wo
W
NUNO
rim.•
1;
"a
Z�w
I
m<OU
Z
Il
>
m�(wj
i ¢ ZQ
R g
W
C
7
.
W
w
-ZZ��
ti Q
Z ZW�ZKw
�
0
w
U F
LL1
W
Q7-
W Ow
���
- w
Wp�va,U
z 11yy
U
C
��
w
-
w
O wa
QOQ
91
vZl
'
-
��§
,,,
�$�Za
ig
2
o o
�>�
U
�
�j
��$I
N WW
(/I Cam
�
K
K
g
wi
n°
Waz
0
oz2�
i -i,
I F
3
��
u
n g
4�
S g
g -
O%
~pFjN
0
-2� N
y4aw,
w
M,
Q
>O
w
ry
U ww
O ua
n r
a
i .
n Nl
{rµr,aj
a?w
h
fl
o
g
S
..
Z
no
.
/ -- -1 ; --- %
1 I'-,-,------,---,--',"
/--- _�;_!-.11'.111;., i11',I ;i 1 \11'1\, :;\';•`,
,
pR
: 4
."'
-
rvM
_
II: ---
''.1;; _-
,1 1 -
rl"I,il 'i:1 :1 _
%;.
'.
/v
/,/Aai-
•�,
- - \::
?�__ - . - -
',\' +; -
:l•i
_ _ „yf/,„; •111,'• __--
/..,,,"
%i;Ss+ it -.._
%i •i - - - -- =-
__ _ ___ ____ i i -
/,
_"- --____ ;i%li _-_
u ;l:
'os.'ii;ii � --
i
%s'- _
--- ++,-s:n -
s«.-�
=4r.
i
a ,"" - -
!iiiii i
l",
","I '''' ' ''
---.,'', �
- EB OVN ry
V
�
``\,,,1 ;I t
;1
it i i % r '\ r\i;; :1Lt;{ ;;
. 1 l , `. 1. .,,,,,,
1 „
-' .�\�� '� \+1111
il'
I'I: ;'nliliuu"' Inlu^::'lil'
' l i !illi;,,: i'%f
"� n
\,
r4
- I
li 1• i t
':l! IIII4ID""" t''il
A
1
1 I
'"
ill
i:i is
_ _ ;� iii0.
- ' 1 r 'a'lii'" _
i; '.1 rain^ \+3�°1;,,1„,.:C,;,'.-
' '1%ilii%% �_
:l^
'.;
- klr
''-5%i: _ .
:1\Alni,l ::�:•
%Illi'' ;;;i;;
„'
'illlll' , I II,N''1 il-�.-.t
G;; 4;:
_ - "1''1 Ill\ \
mil,,lir • ) ;
11
o\
- iii: _ -
flliili; ';'1�"
W
,�•11ii ___ ,
%i 1'1 1
i'L"
___ 1•,11 _____
i;Ji
II
:':::
`\
-
F. i,_
s• ,
- - / 'lllllrrllllrlll•••`%;:' - -
- - =_
' i%iiiiiGs �: -
ii
-- _ZN "Illy' 11 /;' 'i Ali =
<? %;
s i_
2. -
_ _ - li{: ter,
P
;,\ -
u;iiiiiir°nii ^r, -- r+a,• -
i`
c:.
- - moi; `--- __
-- - `) \111`1`)
- ) i ,,ill;: „iii• :ll' I
'!))111111+//:,; vi/1 '- - --\' \ ` ' /
,1. ;J.; __ ,_ _
;'i,/
?Il', -
j;'
i� _
11;1 I//��// 'i (il - ---"-' - ,'111(1 ilI 11li
ill/ //
ii(, _ -
Ir%//' ,Ill,/ -'-_ it
g� ;;1 r+ir _ ___ _ __ - -
r
u•M;,', +' 1 1 I - -- `\\\\„ 1111111
:11:1 ,,'111, - ___ _____
",, '"\'�:' r ;ill/ iii.
T'" ` •\\
111
;` - - `pili.
1 -
- ;1'I;;
! ', w." A'., -- _ � i! ; ''111 I„
- - ,•IIII
illl;lll
.Ili; rl"
_ ' 11 1`i;l
,'r Ill/ 111'. '%I"
NM���• --' 1il' 1, i,lr 1 •'•1,`
1'11
_ - '; ;oiiii; ;•i; ,':Ilii,,%r;�ir
__-- -- 'lil ii i j;!ii %ry;
ii;",i!,; 1„ \i\`� - - - ii .;I;;;;;.i„r;,%'•'':;'1
, ,`'..�,"` - ,,;iii 11 il:.�i"";i;... �i';
r!i;i
L•i
n -
N^'
:sz'
I,
j'; - {
v„r';•' �lil'
__ 'r I
i' 1
�q \, - 1111;: ,l ,I' _- .';'k'"'�'�:?:: ::_.:,%
:;+i _
..
'' ;
I, \. - ,y�r ..
"; t c ,.:3
11111 .•:l'i ( / h
:\
11 \l
„\\
;'.'
'1 1 i
l ,'nnyin vry';;
\' ;
:'an _ -%fir' _ r'!ri 'Iii ailt�tiin IvYy�r;i
i'ij'"I, „ji '"1;
-J•/ --- ;, Ii ;iii �',. 1',1'.\': . 'it"",
rililr.;,1„ •rt
�.: ;;1;\1\1\x\`.`,-: • },q;;; ':;i:;i!!:'';:,`\\:�:.`::
- , 1 / ;'*;+1. - '11;;'11111 1111',,,1\, \,.,,.,.
111111''" 11;111\\1'::.
_ ,�, ','` '\1\111, „•`� ';\U\\1\\`'.,�,
�'�f� __ lily itt\::\':jl\�a:,p\,; �.`.
I lr ,IIII �- '�` %. - -
\\
`` _
:illl,l --_----- --
__ ____ __ _ ' , /
'11!11,, !,`_'`,`-_` ,�`, N„'' ; /'r
:�'• - ,loll '`\`,.
__ �'r. y: /iii'; _
i -I
_ _ +
._-; _, _/ oil;;;', �\-"- _- -__
____ 11 •\I ,,I\
_ __
i Y- Jri / K trs, iirF♦l ii - - - -
r� i -r_' _ -
- -
♦
•
/:
i/
r---
�li� 1i1 l iil "' i, -
;1
--
--
i il'I \• i •, ri
it -
{
--
' � ' I I I •
E `'
i
1'i 111•••1
1 i
;i;'• _
!;
- v
�t
I
I;i,/ ---- - iii/"";;'I'll ---- - - -
_ _
o :i. -
'til _ _
y
-j _
.;1
hl'. <\', ,'o0-1
ur 'U\�,,, _ _ .:�,
:,'- -- - -
;q:j
;i;
il
_ /ii:; .
%ilb /^.
'Illi d' ,
v-
11ni ,
i'''iL ;�; r,
:i
-1ia ;,;; 11.1/•1
----` _ IlI�1/Iron:;
iii/ ,'i �'',, ,1:,�
li
.:i ;
'.1
I
- ' ;- „11i',;'; 1';'1'1,''':';'1 ---- '!i.
ilii t
11 -
__ __ _ !%'.111111
I
',Yom' '''i; ` ,? _ `/ .
_ II
itw.
/i r _ 111„�;;i;
/ , i.'/•;
_ i'i;
_ ;ii,'1' _
__ - '1111 . '1;111'', I'lI'
` ii ;I
_ - ,,ifi%/ i % N11",•' '111,•''' ;1` '; ',1
6-• tt11
Il
- I;
.:7,"",;",,;""' ,:"""v
,N ;Il 't;'
` _
%i. _ '\\\\\ ::1 •Ili" t/i' 1 _
'' _ _
riI
;, i 1
,
- 11 ".1i
.II
-- NHf
,I iii%
',11'x;
;r
i•
•'on•i In r v
�•il •/ 11
•P it
i I ;'P,%., 1;;11%ii:r_-;:_'%;'
-- 'Sti; .".t\ '.rr1 Tif"iii! �,.•lrl,;I'::,^-;,',.
`;ilii,,;,,' „l
I ^i%ray'
Y`
tr
1 !,
:I'
- l`
-- ^nut -
- \n ,1
,.rill 1 ,
\\ \\"
\+\,� -- i.�.• ;;1;i;4yiln",•.: -.',',ill;
:\': :rH;ri�.%I.'. '111'1"•
," _ __
'!% ;;y')fe '11 'i f)i
-- 1'; Ir
�iW
' ,111,,; ;�i - "iili'j
\1'. l; j;,. `".N.,,'�11;'i 1.11`. ''''_� r
;''1;'11,1 ';''di -- ,-l' ..I.' ,.1 \. iij; 11;1
1:;1;,1„ ;•
;;;''
,r '-
_ ij l;' - ) ::YA,441iii;1f1; -- '
-s "ifi - _ :;";
--::
- ,1i r. 1111: ___ _
It., I , , , , �::--- -_ - i __ _
- . , , -
11.1', -J!", , --
- � , !
fll - I•%.' %lir/_-•\`'\--',
i, .. - . , , ii; Ut - ;i �'%: /ij,';i .'-'---
,W,� "',"" ,
I. ill,' 11; --
- /''
,. ,.. 1'11'1, !'%': i/1,, - -
_ _ __ ,'1., .1 ___
_ __ _ II'• ______
,:" `
`'1-\) til `li i l,l, i; ,,,,, �'�%%/}. -_ ---- :-1\11\1",
\ 1
I I' R Ill _ : I!; +i!%ti%ii 1 _ - -\I `i
1' r
;11
1
I
it ( �, ;i ,; - ;;i;i;; l!l
;, - (,
I
i',,, -
is
;> --
` ;'; =__
>': ' ;' =
'''11,''1 1 i •%•'-=-----
;�!
i""r,/
•/in' i11 1 i - --- =
I i i I' __
• f i�" _, • __- --
�' _
,i"I` �\--------
,-
tl'/
L'
ifi• --'- _ •`\•.
�' ,
�' \`.
1
__ i
11,
''\ ;
i; r it ; 1 { ,i
.l 111 f' /
.
I
,'1'11 \
-
f
1 r' _,
1
1 '.lt \
•
i'
�_ _ L
i^ --_- `11','1.1 1 __ ,-
.1 -
__ ._ t
l'l Ill,;
- --
Ij^
/1 = ii
ii%;; ;'i 1
111 ;
\\`
;: �`,..
i;ii '
;; ;%
ri
;'!i'; -,
ill
\,1,
;:;:..,::' , , -
•,'ii.'�i�l'11; 11;11,. \'
;•1•;:11.1.. 1.1.';'.. ---
- .. . __ ../..r'r l.l'!
�;;
l ,
_ 1\, ; ,i
--, /'' 1_
-111
i -
is %� ,ii: ' i
llr. 1\:
..1 11 ! 1;; -"
;-
i - r P ,,\ __
.I!I 1 -, , . �" .Ii . . .� ,. ". . l" ,......l,1."."......."..�., . ,.,,." .. , ''.-',,.1 .,,1 I....1",..., .,, .�"..,,,- .;,�,,., .-",",,-'..,,",,.,,.,"",",,,,II,.�., l...., . ., ,., - . .'I.-, 1,,, ,, ,,11
r/
,,- ,,"--:; ,, --,,-:���-..:-, --,":' -,1,. ,--11i,-,, ,,r";",,:,;,1j,.,
1.",,
,,//1,,111 -- '•'//;. .:�.-,,,.-.�':,,,-',-..�,-",,,-,,�'-%�-- , ' -z-
__ -
1 ;"'li ;'; �' ' :;''1''1:1: •_ --
:, I,- I , ---,.� .:iN-,."i"i, .:;.i, -, '"...i-,, -,i..,
,.�'., -1
------ -----
' ---�-
--
,1'l li ,rill ! i' • /.'.
1. ; -
i
w�
w
Q.
_
6�
Z
I= -•3Z
0 9
6
_
O_
w V'
a600
__ _ __ _ _ _ - __
__ __ _ _____ ____ ___ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1\\� __
`- --____ _-__ ____ _ - - -_
Z
g j
U
�
W
�rc
(9
,r
>
O
_
'-- - "_-'--- _ -- _-
__ __ __ -
-+ZO
=(JZ�
f
13 0
O OJ
aW
0
,�Q�
WW
w W W
r/, K W
6 w
to
W
K
Z U
2 Z
-
Z
-
O
> W '
- ZZ
O>O
O-
T
Z N p W
r7d� Y
Q
N�z�
p(
W Z
2
8,,
wholqy
Ii
- w
W
i
\'1, i
i
ow-
OQ
0.
Y i-
i
w
IoF-Z6i
UNw
14LLIIOz
W
�w�
'd' (iRH
Y
S
a
I++wo
W
NUNO
rim.•
1;
~
Z�w
O
m<OU
Z
Il
>
m�(wj
i ¢ ZQ
p =
W
w
-ZZ��
ti Q
Z ZW�ZKw
�
0
w
U F
LL1
Z
o
V
W Ow
���
- w
Wp�va,U
z 11yy
U
C
��
w
-
w
O wa
QOQ
wnlm
vZl
U �O
w J
��§
z
�$�Za
<
2
o o
�>�
U
Y1- w>
>F,X�-
�j
�Ji
N WW
(/I Cam
�
K
K
F
m TF
RLL N
Waz
0
oz2�
i -i,
z �d3
k O
=Z¢�
Iyal
4�
O
~pFjN
0
-2� N
y4aw,
w
M,
5, .z
?w�im
.-
>O
w
ry
U ww
O ua
n r
a
i .
n Nl
{rµr,aj
a?w
h
\\ \\"
\+\,� -- i.�.• ;;1;i;4yiln",•.: -.',',ill;
:\': :rH;ri�.%I.'. '111'1"•
," _ __
'!% ;;y')fe '11 'i f)i
-- 1'; Ir
�iW
' ,111,,; ;�i - "iili'j
\1'. l; j;,. `".N.,,'�11;'i 1.11`. ''''_� r
;''1;'11,1 ';''di -- ,-l' ..I.' ,.1 \. iij; 11;1
1:;1;,1„ ;•
;;;''
,r '-
_ ij l;' - ) ::YA,441iii;1f1; -- '
-s "ifi - _ :;";
--::
- ,1i r. 1111: ___ _
It., I , , , , �::--- -_ - i __ _
- . , , -
11.1', -J!", , --
- � , !
fll - I•%.' %lir/_-•\`'\--',
i, .. - . , , ii; Ut - ;i �'%: /ij,';i .'-'---
,W,� "',"" ,
I. ill,' 11; --
- /''
,. ,.. 1'11'1, !'%': i/1,, - -
_ _ __ ,'1., .1 ___
_ __ _ II'• ______
,:" `
`'1-\) til `li i l,l, i; ,,,,, �'�%%/}. -_ ---- :-1\11\1",
\ 1
I I' R Ill _ : I!; +i!%ti%ii 1 _ - -\I `i
1' r
;11
1
I
it ( �, ;i ,; - ;;i;i;; l!l
;, - (,
I
i',,, -
is
;> --
` ;'; =__
>': ' ;' =
'''11,''1 1 i •%•'-=-----
;�!
i""r,/
•/in' i11 1 i - --- =
I i i I' __
• f i�" _, • __- --
�' _
,i"I` �\--------
,-
tl'/
L'
ifi• --'- _ •`\•.
�' ,
�' \`.
1
__ i
11,
''\ ;
i; r it ; 1 { ,i
.l 111 f' /
.
I
,'1'11 \
-
f
1 r' _,
1
1 '.lt \
•
i'
�_ _ L
i^ --_- `11','1.1 1 __ ,-
.1 -
__ ._ t
l'l Ill,;
- --
Ij^
/1 = ii
ii%;; ;'i 1
111 ;
\\`
;: �`,..
i;ii '
;; ;%
ri
;'!i'; -,
ill
\,1,
;:;:..,::' , , -
•,'ii.'�i�l'11; 11;11,. \'
;•1•;:11.1.. 1.1.';'.. ---
- .. . __ ../..r'r l.l'!
�;;
l ,
_ 1\, ; ,i
--, /'' 1_
-111
i -
is %� ,ii: ' i
llr. 1\:
..1 11 ! 1;; -"
;-
i - r P ,,\ __
.I!I 1 -, , . �" .Ii . . .� ,. ". . l" ,......l,1."."......."..�., . ,.,,." .. , ''.-',,.1 .,,1 I....1",..., .,, .�"..,,,- .;,�,,., .-",",,-'..,,",,.,,.,"",",,,,II,.�., l...., . ., ,., - . .'I.-, 1,,, ,, ,,11
r/
,,- ,,"--:; ,, --,,-:���-..:-, --,":' -,1,. ,--11i,-,, ,,r";",,:,;,1j,.,
1.",,
,,//1,,111 -- '•'//;. .:�.-,,,.-.�':,,,-',-..�,-",,,-,,�'-%�-- , ' -z-
__ -
1 ;"'li ;'; �' ' :;''1''1:1: •_ --
:, I,- I , ---,.� .:iN-,."i"i, .:;.i, -, '"...i-,, -,i..,
,.�'., -1
------ -----
' ---�-
--
,1'l li ,rill ! i' • /.'.
1. ; -
w
Q.
_ _
_ _ _ _ _____ _ - \
_ _�_ __ _______ _ __
_ _ ___ _ ________ _ __ 1111\
Z
_
_ _ _
_ _ _
__ - _ __ - - - '
_ _ _ __ ____ __ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ ;,1
_ -'_ - , _
LLJ
(�
_
O_
__ _ __ _ _ _ - __
__ __ _ _____ ____ ___ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1\\� __
`- --____ _-__ ____ _ - - -_
Wo
W
(9
_-_,_ ____
- - ______ _ -- -__
O
O
_
'-- - "_-'--- _ -- _-
__ __ __ -
0
f
o
- ----------
! ------------------
_y
- -- - -
_; -) f;
- _
O
i
\'1, i
i
Vi
1
_ '
t
1
1;
r ;1
-
i_
'' _ : l
owDf q/ltl 0 Nd Lltl O D Dfii-M11Nd 1. 6R /mYYu° JD

z
z
y
N
M
oN a o
up
O 9
z
Cm
C
p
v L
to
emZ c=
y o o mm o
0
o I A
on o <% m o m o
<rB
H
n
Cl
G
•
�•
••
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
THIS DRAWING PREPARED AT THE
RALEIGH OFFICE
5410 Trinity Road, Suite 112 j Raleigh, NC 27607
LIMITS OF
ISTURBANCE
0
Endwall
i
TOP V
INV OU
'es
Varies (Stream Cr
ss ng)
C
Site Development
Residential I Infrastructure Technology
I
PERSON COUNTY MEGA -SITE
=
y T�'wl
y a 31 I
a�
DATE
REVISION DESCRIPTION
=
w
D
O
I PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
ra
Z
m c
g
m
I
ntlwall 2
_
m
m
O p
y
� pm
NV IN Vanes (Stre.
�
Crossing)
mdZ A
I
These plana
LIMITSOF
ISTURBANCE
C
p
v L
to
emZ c=
y o o mm o
0
o I A
on o <% m o m o
<rB
H
n
TIMMONS
G
•
�•
••
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
THIS DRAWING PREPARED AT THE
RALEIGH OFFICE
5410 Trinity Road, Suite 112 j Raleigh, NC 27607
0
•
TEL 919.86fi.4951 FAX [phone] www.timmons.cam
Site Development
Residential I Infrastructure Technology
I
PERSON COUNTY MEGA -SITE
=
a�
DATE
REVISION DESCRIPTION
=
w
e m
N o
I PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
m
m c
g
m
m
m
TYPICAL STREAM CROSSINGS
z
These plana
and as
ciatod
documents are the a Wsiwe property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced In whole or In part and shall not be used
for
any Purpose whatsoever,
incluslva, but net limped to construction. bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.

v
z
z
M
In
M
O
z
<
M
twit O N o w � w O
w o n o w u w o
71
2
m D
< X_ �L�71
1
a z m
J.
to
rn me A
0
o A
Zy
w o< u o w o w o
<w
n.
do
w
l7
3
TIMMONS GROUP
= LQ m I PERSON COUNTY MEGA -SITE
A IW PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
" " TYPICAL OUTLET DISCHARGE
These plans and a .idled document, o e the eMclusiv om,vt, of TIMMONS GROUP and ma, ot be reo,od,ced in whole or in oart and shall not be used
pose whatsoewe, Inclusive, but not limnetl to const—tion, bidding, and/or construction slaking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.
00000
.
•
•
•
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH
OURS.
NO
N
Site Development
,ll
m0
Am
mm
N ti
i
F
F
I
DATE
REVISION DESCRIPTION
I
�
X I
rh t
`
_
Z
i'
I
I;
w rA i
II
I
/
i
_
w
/
w
r
/�
m_..—._
_.._
th
Ki
O�
t
w o n o w u w o
71
2
m D
< X_ �L�71
1
a z m
J.
to
rn me A
0
o A
Zy
w o< u o w o w o
<w
n.
do
w
l7
3
TIMMONS GROUP
= LQ m I PERSON COUNTY MEGA -SITE
A IW PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
" " TYPICAL OUTLET DISCHARGE
These plans and a .idled document, o e the eMclusiv om,vt, of TIMMONS GROUP and ma, ot be reo,od,ced in whole or in oart and shall not be used
pose whatsoewe, Inclusive, but not limnetl to const—tion, bidding, and/or construction slaking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.
00000
.
•
•
•
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH
OURS.
THIS DRAWING PREPARED AT THE
RA'EION OFFICE
5410 Trinity Road, Suite 112 1 Raleigh, NC 27607
TEL [phone] FAX 919.859. S663 www.timmons.mm
Site Development
Residential I Infrastructure I Technology
i
F
F
m
DATE
REVISION DESCRIPTION

02-86vmled_Irece,uwu�cnvv
cerouw,=vireo_=nv_r=mmnsa,nut;-,uuureinege.awylnrnep on ,uner[u,n,,:u graloY inns Mess
co
Go
I
co
m
n
m
I
m
m
m I
-r°
1
z
OO
<
z
<<
z
m
m
m
l
WIDTH VARIE
/
/
II
4
0A
y
2
Dp
\
_NNm
mFxN
n0
�
o xDD
\
\
1�
mc
o
O
I II
mx�zcrn/I
II
G)
a
rn
GROUP.
YOOCIEVED THUGH OURS.
THIS DRAWING PREPARE AT THE
RALEIGH OFFICE
5410 Trinity Road ,Suite 102 Raleigh, NC
27607TIMMONS
TEL [phone] FAX [phone] www.timmons.com
North Carolina License No. C-1652
COUNTY MEGA -SITE
mot�Om.mvo
NNo
DATE
REVISION DESCRIPTION
6
N`O
PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Z w
m
to
W m
TYPICAL FLOODPLAIN CROSSINGS
T—pieend
essoda
EmeaN-du== popey M
xlietcoever. inclusive , but
TIMMONS GROUP ndmy rob= p4en de ina d m—d foreny ppe
nIld
n

APPENDIX D
WATERS OF THE U.S. IMPACTS MAPS

Legend
Project Study Limits - 1,456.0 Acres
r Limits of Disturbance - 318.0 Acres
. i
Permanent Stream Impact I
Intermittent Stream (R4)
j I ti� E
Perennial Stream (R3) \ w
I Sheet 6 = -o E Q
- - - - Other Streamw
`
SO �^
Permanent Wetland Impact �° eRa — a o o a p
... ..I 0
Ponds ,.� mac s 30-36 o "� u
jLL
Wetlands I J -°ti r /' W
o 0
o
Phase 1 Sheet 5
'..t.� ,1.r.....� ._�%
Phase 2 L. %' ImPacte 23-29 `c
Sit. Accaaa tl ( H
NOTES:
7 LY
1. WATERS OF THE U.S. WITHIN THE PROJECT STUDY Sheet 2
_
SR. Accss 92 ~ Q
LIMITS HAVE BEEN GPS LOCATED BY TIMMONS GROUP.
2. WATERS OF THE U.S. HAVE BEEN CONFIRMED BY THE i� v
U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. ) o e E
3. PROJECT STUDY LIMITS ARE APPROXIMATE. I © ...•—{ i� i o
4. TOPOGRAPHY BASED ON USGS LIDAR DATA. ` w
DATE
°n-� >
5. COWARDIN STREAM CLASSIFICATIONS ARE BASED •— - ' --- -- — .-I n w
SOLELY ON FIELD OBSERVATIONS. NO FORMAL STREAM_ Impacts )-9 10/23/2018
ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY WAS COMPLETED TO f
DETERMINE THESE COWARDIN CLASSIFICATIONS. `} f � Impacts is -16 �N DRAWN BY
L. MAJOR
a � —
v.
/ 7 a Pd c°
S �.`�..r�..J-•'. � I Sheet 4 °� o-
DE SIGNED BY
'� s + - CHECKED BY
-- — .—..------- i-• ` `�..t Z A. REUSCHE
SCALE
.. y.,� t.( 'i .� •�c r 1" — 1,100'
•>i S 2h •
�tM-tarr.tPe � 'tfl,✓1 a
enarno-2arna sin, � y
U
O Q to
�µc9hOBsMWRp '�N Cr° a ~
Q � F
U.
W as U O
o ar UA
To ne a aasleeana�.Rtl— f� W
- A• Fa. z 3
Z a
4° 4meIM1lapr Pd r
z z
Z O
M
ey °•a'It%+ O U
I c
Z O C
N ,raa
F
-w D,
y�4 n P .Ea Wran°n-Aa°L / �9��Pn.R° O W d Q
°O 9y I m,.pd Krenanau-0r� a H
Earver.NaURa Cze
—paaurulIxa—S s", a°ar�nj �i4• a ea W
ky aPFx Dr °jB e. ; a
a ee
E ° v
F° R
3OG voPWr lanepr� M'J-/q a4
0 1,100 2,200 4,400
Feet s^°p7 5 l06 NO.
GaYt°m3t Tnn.
B°aealepl— � \fir 39329
3� o

Legend I
I
Project Study Limits - 1,456.0 Acres
r ` Limits of Disturbance - 318.0 Acres I
Permanent Stream Impact
I
Intermittent Stream (R4) O
I =
E
Perennial Stream (R3)
� E L
t O
r 3
- - - Other Streama w E w`
0
I.. ... �� - < LL c -•• z
O Permanent Wetland Impact a 0 2 O
ww " u
a< m c a
- Ponds \z o
- Wetlands \ I y 0 3 ~ w
Site Access #2
O I 0
EdwlrrRobertsanRtl
O
Phase 1
Phase 2 m ;
\ w
NOTES:
1. WATERS OF THE U.S. WITHIN THE PROJECT STUDY
LIMITS HAVE BEEN GPS LOCATED BY TIMMONS GROUP.
2. WATERS OF THE U.S. HAVE BEEN CONFIRMED BY THE
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. E
3. PROJECT STUDY LIMITS ARE APPROXIMATE. \ o
4. TOPOGRAPHY BASED ON USGS LIDAR DATA, DATE
5. COWARDIN STREAM CLASSIFICATIONS ARE BASED d
SOLELY ON FIELD OBSERVATIONS. NO FORMAL STREAM 0 10/23/2018
ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY WAS COMPLETED TO
DETERMINE THESE COWARDIN CLASSIFICATIONS. ¢ DRAWN BY
L. MAJOR
DESIGNED BY
CHECKED BY
A. REUSCHE
SCALE
I" = 100'
r
•
CL
f
U
OQ z tri
a�
W
W u o
UJ
O UJ
O z 3
O z
z z
O °
UO
Z ZZ
00 M
O LU a
a
J
W
C
a
D
0 100 zao aoo
Feet
4
❑ �7
39329
SHEET NO.
2 OF7

Legend
LMTMTUrMff
r Project Study Limits - 1,456.0 Acres
r Limits of Disturbance - 318.0 Acres
dot J
Permanent Stream Impact
nry1�I ITII I
Intermittent Stream (R4)
u
c
Perennial Stream (R3)
O
O
H
w > E
a€
�
_
p
O
- - - - Other Stream
¢O
Permanent Wetland Impact
0
z
o
m
q
a
- Ponds
O
a 4
z o m
0
- Wetlands
a LL
o
o
z
Phase 1
(�
0
_o
R
2
In
Phase 2
y
NOTES:
1. WATERS OF THE U.S. WITHIN THE PROJECT STUDY
LIMITS HAVE BEEN GPS LOCATED BY TIMMONS GROUP.
F
2. WATERS OF THE U.S. HAVE BEEN CONFIRMED BY THE
E
O
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
3. PROJECT STUDY LIMITS ARE APPROXIMATE.
o
DATE
4. TOPOGRAPHY BASED ON USGS LIDAR DATA
v
m
5. COWARDIN STREAM CLASSIFICATIONS ARE BASED
SOLELY ON FIELD OBSERVATIONS. NO FORMAL STREAM
m
10/2.3/2018
ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY WAS COMPLETED TO
DETERMINE THESE COWARDIN CLASSIFICATIONS.
0
Mwfl
DRAWN BY
L. MAJOR
DESIGNED BY
a
------------
CHECKED BY
=
+
A. REUSCHE
SCALE
1" = 100'
0
•
0
•
O0
a'
O
O
0
CL
IL
a
v
a
Y
a
a
f
O
a�
W
LP) u
0
UJ
z
3
z
z
o
IMMIMS
C�
V
Z
Z z°
00
ae
N
v� V)
O
C9 W
7
W �'
a
a
z
J
W
i
a
I'
o tea 200 400
-
Feet
JOB NO.
39329
SHEET NO.
--•--.,

Legend
r Project Study Limits - 1,456.0 Acres
r Limits of Disturbance - 318.0 Acres
lal J
Permanent Stream Impact
Intermittent Stream (R4)
m
d
Perennial Stream (R3)
a_E
o >
- - - - Other Stream w`
Permanent Wetland Impact o o Q o 0
rc� mh e F
11
Ponds z o z
3� i¢ r N
Wetlands LL — w
a
_y yb m z
Phase 1
a w
Phase 2
NOTES: \ m
\ I K
1. WATERS OF THE U.S. WITHIN THE PROJECT STUDY
LIMITS HAVE BEEN GPS LOCATED BY TIMMONS GROUP. '////
2. WATERS OF THE U.S. HAVE BEEN CONFIRMED BY THE ~
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. a E
3. PROJECT STUDY LIMITS ARE APPROXIMATE. (� o
4. TOPOGRAPHY BASED ON USGS LIDAR DATA I F}{ > DATE
5. COWARMN STREAM CLASSIFICATIONS ARE BASED lJ I d
SOLELY ON FIELD OBSERVATIONS. NO FORMAL STREAM 10/23/2018
ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY WAS COMPLETED TO
DETERMINE THESE COWARDIN CLASSIFICATIONS. y DRAWN BY
L. MAJOR
DESIGNED BY
------------
CHECKED BY
A. REUSCHE
SCALE
�
1" = 100'
z i
L�
a a
a
f
1n
u
a
Y a
O � �
a-
W
a0
\ W u o
m
LU
z 3
Z a
z O
V O v
U ~
i
Zz
O o
[A
W a a
CL Z
Ld
Ld
0,
IL
0 100 200 400
Feet ]OB N
r.� 39329
SHEET N1.
- 40F7

Legend
Project Study Limits - 1,456.0 Acres
r Limits of Disturbance - 318.0 Acres
Permanent Stream Impact
c
Intermittent Stream (R4)
Perennial Stream (R3)
N
w
N
c
- - - - Other Stream
o
a w t
o
>
w`
Permanent Wetland Impact
�o
a o o
_
c
o
Ponds
50 m�
a
i o N x
uU
Wetlands
a ax
m
U
Phase 1
N e
3
Phase 2
m
3oF
`c
;
x
c
TJ
a
NOTES:
1. WATERS OF THE U.S. WITHIN THE PROJECT STUDY
LIMITS HAVE BEEN GPS LOCATED BY TIMMONS GROUP.
2. WATERS OF THE U.S. HAVE BEEN CONFIRMED BY THE
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
C
vn
~
3. PROJECT STUDY LIMITS ARE APPROXIMATE.
4. TOPOGRAPHY BASED ON USGS LIDAR DATA.
5. COWARDIN STREAM CLASSIFICATIONS ARE BASED
<
o
v
DATE
SOLELY ON FIELD OBSERVATIONS. NO FORMAL STREAM
1012312018
ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY WASCOMPLETEDTO
DETERMINE THESE COWARDIN CLASSIFICATIONS.
r
N
DRAWN BY
L. MAJOR
DESIGNED BY
CHECKED BY
A. REUSCHE
;1
SCALE
e
100'
I I
•
I
j
�
a
a
II
I�
f
In
IL
1
Y
a
a
N
az
W
t-
i
W u
o
m
W
z
3
F
z
\
\\`
O =
U a
Zo
o
N
.,
UJ
Z
Z
M
LAJ
/I
a
i
0 100 200 400
Feet
'1
JOB NO.
.1
39329
SHEET NO.
SOFT

Path R \805139329 Person C.-ty MegaSnc\GIS\Wedand Imyacls: 622201039329-WTIM.mxd
m>.P..�tir_
Dwr0ov
O0Ox1DND
r 1
-
CI
�N« m
11
I
I
I I m
W
D o
12,
t
7
d
v�"'-�
NmOti<CrnS Zm
O
= S O m
N
g
m
N
r
3
0
T=omm�om
p00 y Drapr mC�c
�G
N ? N
j
3
ZZ<ONCmymN
Op�O�ZyNN
Dr C ON�SOF
L1 yNZ
N N
.O<. y
N
(e
.�.
fDEn000,
._..
0_
N
r
C
T2
"1y y N V N T S
m
3
-
47
m
—
N
<
z m zNm
m"o-op o�v
pyp Zap
�m�a>> p0`m
0
3
3
3
3
O
m
3
-
N
_,
y D A y
?TrT. m
D
-M N m � N y
OA Op
^
0)
O
T o
N
N
m =�<
m
>
m
N
D
o
�
N
S
sOa.
h�
GROUP
`
�CNCETONU
THIS AT THE
CORPORATE OFFICE
1001 BulderParkway, Suite 3(0 Richmod.
VA 23215TIMMONS
TEL [phone] FAX [phone] www.brmm�ns.
cam
Site Development I Residential I Infrastructure I Technology I Environmental
N
m
PERSON COUNTY MEGA -PARK
n
o
o
DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION
m
w Q
PERSON COUNTY,NORTH CAROLINA
" Q
A n
c
ti
n
N
n
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S. IMPACTS MAP
rn m
m
<
A

Phase I Imuacts Table
Impact ID
Wetlands . ftStream
Resource ID
Type of Impact'
Impact I Conversion Impact
Temporary Permanent I Temporary Permanent Tem orary I Permanent
1
Phase
Phase II Impacts Table
147
SP
Fill
5b
SR --
1,134
SM
Fill
6b
Type of Impact
1,133
SR
Fill
7
23
163
SS
Fill
8
139
63
ST
Fill
9
SO
17
SU
Fill
11
Road Crossing
924
S32 Site A
Fill
12
139
S35
Fill
13
1,450
S33
Fill
14
W5 Site A
139
S32 Site A
' Fill
15
84
S34
Fill
16
25,986
W6
Fill
17
24,119
—
S30 Marlowe Creek Road Crossing
W7 Site A
Fill
18
418
S36
Fill
19
30
577
S37
Fill
20
505
463
S39
Fill
21
3,275
W8 Site A
Fill
22
14,703
32
W8 Site A
Fill
Total
-- 0sq ft 68,083 sq ft 0 sq ft 0 sq ft
0.00 ac 1.56 ac 0.00 ac 0.00 ac
O ff 6,851 If
G
Road Crossing
6a
Phase
Phase II Impacts Table
----
-
Wetland (sq. ft) - Stream (1)
SR --
4-- Road Crossing
----
Impact ID
Impact 1_ Conversion Fact
Resource ID
Type of Impact
-
S23 Site A
Road Crossing
23
Temporary', Permanent Temporary Permanent Temporary Permanent
-
- ---
2
139
S43
Road Crossing
3
445
SO
Road Crossing
4
1,146
WG
Road Crossing
5a
606
SM
Road Crossing
6a
-- -
----
-
-- - - 112
SR --
4-- Road Crossing
----
10
188
S23 Site A
Road Crossing
23
-
-
- ---
-- 229
- - H -
_ Road Crossing
24
1,753
W11
Road Crossing
25
10,839
1
Road Crossing
26
2,781_
W5 Site A
Road Crossing
27
--
_
-
151
S31
-
Road Cross
28
70
—
S30 Marlowe Creek Road Crossing
29
135
K
Road Crossing
30
505
F
Road Crossin
31
75
G
Road Crossing
32
_ _ 171
G
Road Crossing
33
227
E
i Road Crossin
34
505
F
Road Crossing
35
- _ 67
D
-
Road Crossing
- - 36
-- -
- ----16,519
-sq
-- -'
- � - 53
C
- - -- - ---
_Road Crossing_
Total
0 ft
s� ft
0 sg_ft
0 sq ft
0 I 3,678 If
0.00 ac
0.38 ac
0.00 ac
0.00 ac
Cumulative Impacts Table
_ Wetland (sq.
ft)
Stream
If
(-
Impact ID
-_ Impact
Conversion
- -- -
-- Impact
Temporary
Permanent Tem orarY, Permanent
_._Temporary.
Temporary,Permanent
-
Total
- 0 sq ft -
84,602sqft- -
0 sq ft .......
0 sq ft
0 if 10,529 If
0.00 ac
1.94 ac
0.00 ac
0.00 ac -
ho
m" d
w > E c
E 3 c
Q V; W
zIO
a < c° a
X60 U C
QOLL ~ to
� U W
❑ a � � Z
q
m
a
m
m
E o
g
> DATE
m
10/23/2018
A y DRAWN BY
L. MAJOR
DESIGNED BY
Ili
CHECKED BY
A. REUSCHE
SCALE
r N/A
•
2
W
J
m
a
a
f
Y m
U
Q
Q z f
A M M
' O
WUi
f o
!� o
H z LU
ZF 3
OD
o Z
V U o
Zz
C0
li W
W ^
a
JOB NO,
39329
SHEET NO.
7 OF

APPENDIX E
ON-SITE ALTERNATIVES

3.. e -
✓
v_- r.a _—_ _• _. —
..
eA
wl �
t t - 1 F anyy� •.4 -
- �.ems 1� 1 f .a z.. ; 'l .'4y�,�`°� ` •-, ..
A LL+
Y .a Tw,
r =
r
t 1
r
_ — _ --► e I _ 1 I e 1 ,
4 i �
-

em
no
`7
Mt
e�V
Iry
1!

i .01
n
r y.
t
i
i14
f4
i
t
•ti -- - .fit;
k ,

Legend
Project Study Limes - 1,656.0 Ams
r Limits of Disturbance - 318.0 Avec
— Permanem Stream Impart
— Inlerrni i She— (RI)
Perennial Stream (R3)
Other Stream
Permanent Welland Impact
- Ponds
- Wetlands
FPhase 1
Phase 2
NMlf:
8€
4E ti
6
i
O DATE
• 1012312016
DRAWN BY
L MAJOR
•• DESIGNED B
. CHECKED B'
. A. REUSCHE
•
SMF
• V - 100'
•
C
D i
G
O Z
Q
v
f,
N
3
(Az
~
14
_
°
oz
U
8
FeM
8€
4E ti
6
i
O DATE
• 1012312016
DRAWN BY
L MAJOR
•• DESIGNED B
. CHECKED B'
. A. REUSCHE
•
SMF
• V - 100'
•
C
D i
G
O Z
Q
v
z
3
(Az
~
14
_
°
oz
U
8
Z
U
C
Z
00
N
a
^
0a.
W
n
>^
IY
a
a
—
a
NO
OB NU.
39329
SHEET
OF

APPENDIX E
ON-SITE ALTERNATIVES

/.
It
4+40
5
ti� tilY.ir� � II � r
f -

!J_.'
.�+ fy
.� �, 7 _.��, _.. _ - _.___ ,
�� � .
�,. � r
� � � , �' .
1-
� �y
�G. J '��
'� SES � ��,���,, �I.
.�� ,
�' �� -'� %
� � � � � .�
� --� ,:.�
//
: �! % !�
y'�
:+ �`�� �
t � ` i�
` / ` G
�i ` �` o.
`w.� \_�
�''�_
i '� I �
� a _ _.CC

APPENDIX F
AGENCY COORDINATION

AMA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Office of Land and Water Stewardship
Pat McCrory Bryan Gossage John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Director Secretary
June 6, 2014
Mr. Cory Darnell
ECS Carolinas, LLP
9001 Glenwood Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27617
[e-mail]
RE: Project Trace, Country Club Road and Edwin Robertson Road, Roxboro, Person County, NC
ECS Project No. 06.21626
Dear Mr. Darnell:
Thank you for the opportunity to provide information from the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
(NCNHP) database for the proposed project referenced above. The NCNHP database shows that the
Marlowe Creek Slopes natural heritage area is located in the eastern portion of the proposed project
area, and there are records for the following rare species in close proximity of the project area:
SCIENTIFIC NAME
COMMON NAME
ACCURACY
STATE STATUS*
FEDERAL STATUS*
Acmispon helleri
Carolina Birdfoot-trefoil
High
SC -v
FSC
Hyla versicolor
Northern Gray Treefrog
Medium
SR
---
Ranunculus micrantha
Rock Buttercup
Medium
SR -P
---
Villosa constricta
Notched Rainbow
Medium
SC
---
* For status definitions, please see the Help and Definitions document at htttp://www.ncnhp.Drg/web/nhl)/database-search.
There are two occurrence records for Carolina Birdfoot-trefoil in close proximity: one is located along
the powerline right-of-way on the southern boundary of the project area, just west of the Marlowe
Creek Slopes natural heritage area boundary (and just south of the proposed project boundary), and the
other is located just north of Edwin Robertson Road. Northern Gray Treefrog and Rock Buttercup are
also documented as occurring just north of Edwin Robertson Road and the proposed project area. The
occurrence of Notched Rainbow is located upstream and downstream of Edwin Robertson Road in
Storys Creek.
Attached is a description and map of the Marlowe Creek Slopes natural heritage area from the Inventory
of Significant Natural Areas in Person County, NC (LeGrand 2007), based on field work conducted by
NCNHP in 2006. This portion of the Marlowe Creek Slopes natural heritage area is important for the
Basic Mesic Forest (Piedmont Subtype) natural community that has been mapped along Marlowe Creek,
and also for the rich diversity present on the slopes and the wildflowers present.
Please note that the use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field
surveys if needed, particularly if the project area contains suitable habitat for rare species or important
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled 10', Post Consumer P?p�r

Project Trace, Country Club Road and Edwin Robertson Road, Roxboro, Person County, NC
ECS Project No. 06.21626
June 6, 2014
Page 2
natural communities, or known occurrences of rare species or natural communities. If rare species are
found, please contact us so that we may update our records.
Feel free to contact me at 919-707-8629 or [e-mail] if you have questions or need
additional information. Sincerely,
u4QPMMII� a -
Allison Schwarz Weakley, Conservation Planner
NC Natural Heritage Program

} •' i � `� �� Marlowe Creek Slopes
Person County Natural Areas Inventory - 0 1 • �'
?� (� C% `�,,�1 _ •? Roxboro quad r. ��
Scale 1:24,000 NC NHP January 2007
0:5,
� r � it �, -;, •;^ � l � 1,' j �a,i 1 ,r �'-,` `\ (Jl •� � -'s '�.
', : • �� � ` ✓ � r� ( \ •�>�. ` �%` �..` \,+ , ,,j 4aiz"'� r �� �j�J\.i� ` r i`; i I�'� r(r�t / i�,l- $
j {u � � �_ � - . \ / ,`4� t .� '1 i�,)� u�VJ .%.`'\.1 •,� , /Cf r �1/.� , ,._. � _ i''� _ c ` l,� o f l f�/ ,"tPi i; Q '- "-
--� � q'.' • p\ ` �l fl \ f 1!% r\ .� \\C`—%'t( ,<\ �' `�,i (r,-�. �1-'r r �`�-' /t, v ' ,�
✓,fi��,�; ,.r.1J`lir� / ( / ywrl `-J ,.lo `7 •,y ,�i� { ��.'°1".'=irlc �,,,_, ,�L•, _ \
' _-i �1�• - � ��` �� 11 •� 15 1 ` I � •ir/_/- � '{. � 16' ��-��• `�� ;�-� 'u �lr.. .�8� �:,
� _ ✓ fes. � � -, ..a. r �l�, •� �`3;__ - s � � ) �\
J (� LC_
-7(J \ . � (3)i 1 ' .� _1�1r..; ?_ 1 \•i a I� /.-
� '"r_ � t i r '• 1� U.l �• ,' �— •l i1 \,� _, •R``;—��� ' _� '� ,� `}T. k� �^��/ I /,��'r�.�.y'ii�// i. _ / "�� t ' +� r`` i--
,
? : -.�!' _i �� % ' �'.• l f s ��;%/;-/ ��
ttttt
't�\J f �i•�71' `` - ���;��`� � � rr. � l��„r�-'�!. �1 i S � � ' 11 �� �ti 1 i i - r
See Figure 4 for landscape-scale map
'�� ,) .,�� 1\ �`��'. �'?J 1�•.. i-.i i� ri'^t��il- � :..d..t F I �•\ C., � r r\ rwr _w+`

Person County Natural Areas Inventory
MARLOWE CREEK SLOPES
Site Number: 10 Size: 227 acres
Site Significance: Regional Quadrangle: Roxboro
Ownership: private
SIGNIFICANT FEATURES: This natural area contains perhaps the most extensive series of rich
slopes with wildflowers of any site in the county, with excellent examples of Mesic Mixed
Hardwood Forest natural community. However, it is a very diverse site, containing scarce
communities as well, such as Acidic Piedmont Bluff Glade and Basic Mesic Forest, and it also has
a few examples of Piedmont/Coastal Plain Heath Bluff, as well. Several Watch List plants occur
in the site.
LANDSCAPE RELATIONSHIPS: The natural area abuts Hagers Mountain, just to the east.
Lying downstream by about 0.3 mile (to the north) is the Marlowe Creek Bluff natural area. Farther
downstream, about 0.9 mile to the north, is the southern end of the Storys Creek/Marlowe Creek
Swamp.
SITE DESCRIPTION: Along Marlowe Creek and tributaries on the western side of the creek are
extensive mature hardwood forests. The slopes and bluffs are predominantly covered in Mesic
Mixed Hardwood Forest natural community. These slopes lie mainly on acidic soils, but a few areas
are mapped as Wilkes soil, which is somewhat circumneutral, where Basic Mesic Forest is present.
The former community has American beech (Fagus grandifolia) as a common canopy tree, as is
northern red oak (Quercus rubra). The uncommon maidenhair fern (Adiantum pedatum) is present,
as is a good diversity of spring -flowering herbs, such as foamflower (Tiarella cordifolia), mayapple
(Podophyllum peltatum), and liverleaf (Hepatica americana). In some locales, Christmas fern
(Polystichum acrostichoides) is abundant, and black cohosh (Cimicifuga racemosa) is often
common.
One small area of east -facing slopes contain species such as the Watch List leatherwood (Dirca
palustris), wild hydrangea (Hydrangea arborescens), and goat's -beard (Aruncus dioicus), which
indicate Basic Mesic Forest. The floodplain of Marlowe Creek is somewhat wide on the western
side, and there is a decent -quality Piedmont Small Stream Forest. Tuliptree (Liriodendron
tulipifera) is very common in the canopy, and sycamore (Platanus occidentalis) is numerous.
Spicebush (Lindera benzoin) is a very common shrub, indicating rich soils. One species of interest
in this floodplain is Pursh's phacelia (Phacelia purshii), a range extension to the east, as other state
records are from the mountain region. Leatherwood also grows in the floodplain.
The natural area has a narrow ridge that contains an excellent but small example of Dry Oak -
Hickory Forest with considerable herb diversity. White oak (Q. alba) is the dominant tree, but some
post oak (Q. stellata) is present. The locally scarce eastern featherbells (Stenanthium gramineum)
is scattered here. Early lowbush blueberry (vaceinium pallidum) is a dominant shrub, and maple -
3M

leaf viburnum (Viburnum acerifolium) and deerberry (Vaccinium stamineum) are very common also.
Several species of legumes, such as a few species of tick -trefoils (Desmodium spp.), are present in
the herb layer. The Watch List American shinleaf (Pyrola americana) grows on a mesic slope
nearby. A few slopes contain Dry-Mesic Oak -Hickory Forest, with mockernut hickory (Carya
alba), American beech, northern red oak, and red maple (Acer rubrum) among the canopy trees.
Sourwood (Oxydendrum arboreum), flowering dogwood (Cornus Florida), and black gum (Nyssa
sylvatica) are understory trees. Some blueberries (Vaccinium spp.) are present in the shrub layer,
but the herb layer is rather poor.
In the southern part of the natural area, Marlowe Creek runs through very rocky terrain, with no
floodplain. These rocky and steep slopes are covered with mountain laurel (Kalmia latifolia), often
in very dense tangles; these are Piedmont/Coastal Plain Heath Bluff natural communities. One
narrow east -west ridge east of the creek has a very dry and glade -like south -facing slope. This is
the poorly -known Acidic Piedmont Bluff Glade. There are scattered rocks, and the ground is rather
hard; some eastern red cedars (Juniperus virginiana) are present. There are few shrubs, and the herb
layer is very diverse, with grasses, and a number of legumes and other forbs. Dittany (Cunila
origanoides) is quite common. Other notable herbs include fire pink (Silene virginica), striped
gentian (Gentiana villosa), little ladies -tresses (Spiranthes tuberosa), and cornel-leaf aster
(Doellingeria infirma).
NOTE: Most of the eastern side of Marlowe Creek was not surveyed because of the lack of access.
Thus, the eastern boundary of the natural area is speculative and based solely on aerial photos.
Several powerlines that cut across upper slopes above Marlowe Creek, to the south of the natural
area, contain rare plants; however, as these powerlines do not bisect the site, they are excluded from
the natural area.
PROTECTION AND MANAGEMENT: Most of the site lies in a single private ownership; this
land is leased to a hunt club for hunting during the fall, winter, and spring. As a result, some
ephemeral spring wildflowers, not seen during the June surveys, are presumably present in the'area
and might add to the importance of the natural area. There is no known formal protection of the
natural area. Because of its rather extensive size, it is a high priority for protection, such as with
conservation easements. The area, coupled with the adjacent Hagers Mountain, would be suitable
in acreage for a local park or nature preserve. Little management is needed. Timber harvest, which
occurs to the west of the site, should remain outside the boundary of the natural area, as exotic plants
such as Japanese stilt grass (Microstegium vimineum) rapidly invade rich soil sites such as this. A
few jeep/ATV roads run along ridges toward the creek. It is hoped that no new roads or trails will
be made.
NATURAL COMMUNITIES: Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest, Basic Mesic Forest (Slope variant),
Dry Oak -Hickory Forest (Piedmont Upland variant), Dry-Mesic Oak -Hickory Forest (Piedmont
Upland variant), Acidic Piedmont Bluff Glade, Piedmont/Coastal Plain Heath Bluff, Piedmont Small
Stream Forest.

RARE PLANTS: Watch List — leatherwood (Dirca palustris), American shinleaf (Pyrola
americana).
RARE ANIMALS: None known.
REFERENCES:
LeGrand, H. 2006a. Site report: Marlowe Creek Slopes. N.C. Natural Heritage Program, Office
of Conservation and Community Affairs, DENR, Raleigh.
LeGrand, H. 2006b. Site report: Marlowe Creek Slopes — east of creek. N.C. Natural Heritage
Program, Office of Conservation and Community Affairs, DENR, Raleigh.
FIM

August 4, 2016
Kristen Cottrell
ECS Carolinas, LLP
9001 Glenwood Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27617
RE: Project Trace; 49-2245-C
Dear Kristen Cottrell
P AT'4fcCRORY
SUSA-N KLLTTZ
NCNHDE-2021
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. These
results are presented in the attached 'Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been
documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that
these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists and is
included for reference. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed area within a one -mile radius of the
project area, if any, are also included in this report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project
review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the
NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP
data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), Clean Water Management Trust Fund
(CWMTF) easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact Suzanne Mason at suzanne.mason(a)ncdcr oov or 919.707.8637.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
Nothing ( -, .,

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
Project Trace
Project No. 49-2245-C
August 4, 2016
NCNHDE-2021
Element Occurrences Documented Within Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name
Common Name Last
Element Accuracy Federal
State Global State
Group
Observation
Occurrence Status
Status Rank Rank
Date
Rank
Freshwater 29502 Villosa constricts
Notched Rainbow 2006-02-24
E 3 -Medium ---
Special G3 S3
Bivalve
Concern
Natural Areas Documented Within Project Area
Site Name
Representational Rating
Collective Rating
Storys Creek/Marlowe Creek Swamp
R5 (General)
C5 (General)
No Managed Areas Documented within the Project Area
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httos://ncnhrie_natureserve.org/rontent/ht-I . Data query generated on August 4, 2016; source: NCNHP, 02 June 2016. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 5

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Name Representational Rating
Marlowe Creek Slopes R3 (High)
Storys Creek/Marlowe Creek Swamp R5 (General)
No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Collective Rating
C4 (Moderate)
C5 (General)
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httnc_//ncnhde.nat ireserve orn/rontent/hel . Data query generated on August 4, 2016; source: NCNHP, 02 June 2.016. Please resubmit your
Page 3of5
Project Trace
Project No. 49-2245-C
August 4, 2016
NCNHDE-2021
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
EO ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Last
Element
Accuracy
Federal
State
Global
State
Group
Observation Occurrence
Status
Status
Rank
Rank
Date
Rank
Amphibian
21719
Hyla versicolor
Common Gray Treefrog
2005-07-13
E
3 -Medium
---
Significantly
G5
S2S3
Rare
Freshwater
29502
Villosa constricta
Notched Rainbow
2006-02-24
E
3 -Medium
---
Special
G3
S3
Bivalve
Concern
Natural
25502
Basic Mesic Forest
---
2008
C
2 -High
---
---
G3G4
S3S4
Community
(Piedmont Subtype)
Vascular Plant
24047
Acmispon helleri
Carolina Birdfoot-trefoil
2006-08-09
B
3 -Medium
Species of
Special
G3
S3
Concern
Concern
Vulnerable
Vascular Plant
24127
Acmispon helleri
Carolina Birdfoot-trefoil
2006-09-11
D?
2 -High
Species of
Special
G3
S3
Concern
Concern
Vulnerable
Vascular Plant
24142
Acmispon helleri
Carolina Birdfoot-trefoil
2006-08-22
D
2 -High
Species of
Special
G3
S3
Concern
Concern
Vulnerable
Vascular Plant
27371
Ranunculus micranthus
Rock Buttercup
1973-04-23
H
3 -Medium
---
Significantly
G5
S1
Rare Peripheral
Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Name Representational Rating
Marlowe Creek Slopes R3 (High)
Storys Creek/Marlowe Creek Swamp R5 (General)
No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Collective Rating
C4 (Moderate)
C5 (General)
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httnc_//ncnhde.nat ireserve orn/rontent/hel . Data query generated on August 4, 2016; source: NCNHP, 02 June 2.016. Please resubmit your
Page 3of5

information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 4 of 5

NCNHDE-2021: Project Trace
August 4. 2016
❑ Project Boundary
Buttered Project Bcundary
NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
Page 5 of 5
1:39.235
0L 3.325 0.65 1.2 m
f—t �`�iT• r' r�
0 Oo 1 2km
ep Cv, , 4ERE. DeLuI— I ----V nor -stent n Co,, OEPIO U30G
FAO NPS. NRCAN. GeoSase. IGN 4xlaster NL. Ordnance Survsv. 5sr, Japan
METI, Esn Ctna (Hong Kong:. smsatopo. %Iwmvnaa a Opls"'Map
(OM IDUprs. and tre GIS user Ccp n ry

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh ES Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
July 11, 2014
Cory Darnell
ECS Carolinas, LLP
9001 Glenwood Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27617
Re: Project Trace- Person County, NC
Dear Mr. Darnell:
This letter is to inform you that a list of all federally -protected endangered and threatened species
with known occurrences in North Carolina is now available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service's (Service) web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Therefore, if you have projects that
occur within the Raleigh Field Office's area of responsibility (see attached county list), you no
longer need to contact the Raleigh Field Office for a list of federally -protected species.
Our web page contains a complete and frequently updated list of all endangered and threatened
species protected by the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)(Act), and a list of federal species of concern that are known to occur in
each county in North Carolina.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes.
I The term "federal species of concern" refers to those species which the Service believes might be in need of
concentrated conservation actions. Federal species of concern receive no legal protection and their designation does
not necessarily imply that the species will eventually be proposed for listing as a federally endangered or threatened
species. However, we recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid or minimize adverse impacts to
federal species of concern.

If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
With regard to the above -referenced project, we offer the following remarks. Our comments are
submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
Based on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed
action is not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act at
these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for
your project. Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
However, the Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have
on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we
recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to aquatic species,
including implementing directional boring methods and stringent sediment and erosion control
measures. An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to and approved by
the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section prior to construction.
Erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and maintained between the construction
site and any nearby down -gradient surface waters. In addition, we recommend maintaining
natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum (a
copy can be found on our website at (http:/hvww.fws.gov/raleigh) to address and mitigate
secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and water quality.
We recommend that you consider this document in the development of your projects and in
completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary).
2

We hope you find our web page useful and informative and that following the process described
above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need, for general correspondence for
species' lists. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis of this office at
[phone] ext. 26.
Sincerely,
P e Benjamin
Field Supervisor

List of Counties in the Service's Raleigh Field Office Area of Responsibility
Alamance
Beaufort
Bertie
Bladen
Brunswick
Camden
Carteret
Caswell
Chatham
Chowan
Columbus
Craven
Cumberland
Currituck
Dare
Duplin
Durham
Edgecombe
Franklin
Gates
Granville
Greene
Guilford
Halifax
Harnett
Hertford
Hoke
Hyde
Johnston
Jones
Lee
Lenoir
Martin
Montgomery
Moore
Nash
New Hanover
Northampton
Onslow
Orange
Pamlico
Pasquotank
Pender
4
Perquimans
Person
Pitt
Randolph
Richmond
Robeson
Rockingham
Sampson
Scotland
Tyrrell
Vance
Wake
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Wilson

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh ES Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
July 28, 2016
Paul Stephens IV
ECS Carolinas LLP
9001 Glenwood Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27617
Re: Project Trace — Person County, NC
Dear Mr. Stephens:
This letter is to inform you that a list of all federally -protected endangered and threatened species
with known occurrences in North Carolina is now available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service's (Service) web page at http://www.Avs.00v/raleigh. Therefore, if you have projects that
occur within the Raleigh Field Office's area of responsibility (see attached county list), you no
longer need to contact the Raleigh Field Office fora list of federally -protected species.
Our web page contains a complete and frequently updated list of all endangered and threatened
species protected by the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)(Act), and a list of federal species of concern' that are known to occur in
each county in North Carolina.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes.
' The tenn "federal species of concern" refers to those species which the Service believes might be in need of
concentrated conservation actions. Federal species ofconcern receive no legal protection and their designation docs
not necessarily imply that the species will eventually uc proposed for listing, as a federally endangered or threalened
species. However, we recommend that all practicable treasures be taken to avoid or minimize adverse impacts to
federal species of concern.

If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
With regard to the above -referenced project, we offer the following remarks. Our comments are
submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
Based on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed
action is not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act at
these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for
your project. Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
However, the Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have
on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we
recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to aquatic species,
including implementing directional boring methods and stringent sediment and erosion control
measures. An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to and approved by
the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section prior to construction.
Erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and maintained between the construction
site and any nearby down -gradient surface waters. In addition, we recommend maintaining
natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum (a
copy can be found on our website at (http:,/www.fws.gov/raleigh) to address and mitigate
secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and water quality.
We recommend that you consider this document in the development of your projects and in
completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary).
2

We hope you find our web page useful and informative and that following the process described
above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need, for general correspondence for
species' lists. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis of this office at
[phone] ext. 26.
Sincerely,
v
Pe a Benjamin
Field Supervisor

List of Counties in the Service's Raleigh Field Office Area of Responsibility
Alamance
Beaufort
Bertie
Bladen
Brunswick
Camden
Carteret
Caswell
Chatham
Chowan
Columbus
Craven
Cumberland
Currituck
Dare
Duplin
Durham
Edgecombe
Franklin
Gates
Granville
Greene
Guilford
Halifax
Harnett
Hertford
Hoke
Hyde
Johnston
Jones
Lee
Lenoir
Martin
Montgomery
Moore
Nash
New Hanover
Northampton
Onslow
Orange
Pamlico
Pasquotank
Pender
4
Perquimans
Person
Pitt
Randolph
Richmond
Robeson
Rockingham
Sampson
Scotland
Tyrrell
Vance
Wake
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Wilson

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Banos, Administrator
Governor Pat McCrory
Secretary Susan Kluttz
June 12, 2014
Cory Darnell
ECS Carolinas, LLP
9001 Glenwood Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27617-7505
Office of Archives and Histon'
Depuy Secretary- Kevin Cherry
Re: Project Trace, Country Club Road and Edwin Robertson Road, Roxboro, 06-21626, Person County,
ER 14-1122
Dear Mr. Darnell:
Thank you for your letter of May 22, 2014. We have reviewed the project referenced above and offer the
following comments.
The project tract consists of a large ridge system located between two second to third order streams. This
system contains relatively long linear ridgetops, ridgetoes, and several likely springheads. The topography is
consistent with other settings within the region that contain a high frequency of archaeological resources,
particularly prehistoric sites. While there are no previously recorded archaeological sites noted within the tract
at present, the area has never been surveyed for archaeological resources. Given the nature of this landscape
and the high probability of prehistoric remains, we recommend a Phase I archaeological survey of the tract. As
a result, we recommend the following conditions for this application:
Prior to initiation of any ground disturbing activities within the project area, the applicant shall arrange
for an archaeological survey of the entire project area (approximately 675.55 acres). The purpose of
this survey will be to locate archaeological sites and make recommendations regarding the eligibility
status of each site in terms of the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). If a site is determined
to be eligible for the NRHP the applicant shall determine whether the site will be adversely affected by
the project activities; and, if so, develop and implement an appropriate mitigation plan. Two copies of
all resulting archaeological reports, as well as one copy of the North Carolina site forms, should be
forwarded to the Office of State Archaeology through this office for review and comment as soon as
they are available and in advance of any construction or ground disturbance activities.
A list of archaeological consultants who have conducted or expressed an interest in contract work in North
Carolina is available at .wwtiv.ai_chnaeoliogy.ncLIcr.gov; ncarch resource/consultants.htm. The archaeologists
listed, or any other experienced archaeologist, may be contacted to conduct the recommended survey. All
activities associated with the archaeological investigations shall be coordinated with the Office of State
Archaeology prior to beginning any archaeological fieldwork.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Location: 109 Fast Jones Street, Raleigh NC: 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Scn-ice Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]i7o/801 6599

Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or renee.gledhill-
earle �t)ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced
tracking number.
Sincerely,
6"'Ramona M. Bartos

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Pat McCrory
Secretary Susan Kluttz
July 21, 2016
Paul M. Stephens IV
ECS Carolinas, LLP
9001 Glenwood Ave
Raleigh, NC 27617-7505
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Re: Project Trace Additional Areas, Country Club Road and Edwin Robertson Road, Roxboro,
ECS 49: 2245-C, Person County, ER 14-1122
Dear Mr. Stephens:
Thank you for your letter of June 30, 2016, concerning the above -referenced project. We have reviewed
the project information referenced above and offer the following comments.
The project tract consists of a large ridge system located between two second to third order streams. This
system contains floodplains, terraces, relatively long linear ridgetops, ridgetoes, and several likely
springheads. The topography is consistent with other settings within the region that contain a high
frequency of archaeological resources, particularly prehistoric sites. While there are no previously
recorded archaeological sites noted within the tract at present, the area has never been surveyed for
archaeological resources. Given the nature of this landscape as a whole and the high probability of
prehistoric remains, we recommend a Phase I archaeological survey of the tract. As a result, we
recommend the following conditions for this application:
Prior to initiation of any ground disturbing activities within the project area, the applicant shall
arrange for an archaeological survey of the entire project area (approximately 1,369 acres). The
purpose of this survey will be to locate archaeological sites and make recommendations regarding
the eligibility status of each site in terns of the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). If a
site is determined to be eligible for the NRHP the applicant shall determine whether the site will be
adversely affected by the project activities; and, if so, develop and implement an appropriate
mitigation plan. Two copies of all resulting archaeological reports, as well as one copy of the North
Carolina site forms, should be forwarded to the Office of State Archaeology through this office for
review and comment as soon as they are available and in advance of any construction or ground
disturbance activities.
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mai) Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

A list of archaeological consultants who have conducted or expressed an interest in contract work in
North Carolina is available at www.archaeology.ncdcr.gov/ncarch/resource/consultants.htm. The
archaeologists listed, or any other experienced archaeologist, may be contacted to conduct the
recommended survey. The selected archaeologist will consult with the Office of State Archaeology
regarding the project methods prior to the commencement of any field work activities. All
additional activities associated with the archaeological investigations shall also be coordinated with
the Office of State Archaeology prior to implementation in the field.
We recommend a meeting between the Office of State Archaeology and your office prior to selection of a
contractor in order to discuss survey methods and levels of effort related to this project. We feel a meeting
of this sort will help you develop a survey plan that will be both cost and time -efficient in its application.
In addition, it will help you develop a viable Request for Proposal (RFP) to circulate to potential
contractors. Please contact Ms. Susan Myers at 919-807-6556 or John Mintz at 919-807-6555 to arrange
this meeting.
We have determined that the project as proposed will not have an effect on any historic structures.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
environmental.reviewLa) ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
r, Ramona M. Bartos

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Kartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Couper
Sccrctanv Susi 11. 1 lamtlton
September 15, 2017
Cory B. Darnell
FCS Carolinas, LLP
9001 Glenwood Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27617-7505
Office of Archives and I hstory
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
cdarnell (e,ccslinuted.cotn
Re: Archaeological survey, tracts B and C, Project "Trace Commercial Development, Country Club Road
and Edwin Robertson Road, Roxboro, FCS Project No. 49: 2245-D; Person County, FR 14-1122
Dear Mr. Darnell:
Thank you for your letter of ,-august 22, 2017, transmitting the archaeological survey- report by Brooke Brilliant of
Archaeolofncal Consultants of the Carolinas, Inc. (ACC), for the above project.
During the course of the survey, twelve sites were located within tracts B and C. The following properties are
determined not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places:
31PR148**, 31PR149**, 311)R150, 31PR151, 31PR152**, 31PR153, 31PR154, 3111R155, 31PR156, 31PR157,
31PR158, and 31PR159&159**, because of lack of integrity and inability to contribute further to an understanding of
the area's prehistory or history.
Ms. Brilliant has recommended that no further archaeological investigation be conducted in connection with this
project as proposed. \Ve concur I' ith this recommendation since the project will not involve significant
archaeological resources.
We acknowledge receipt of the archaeological site forms, including those for sites 31 PR 160** through 31 PR 165.
t.t,cated during the reconnaissance survey phase of the project, these six sites are in areas excluded from the
proposed development. Consequently, they remain unassessed as to thetreligibility for the National Register of
I listoric Places (NRI IP). Should their areas be developed in the future, we recommend that 31PR1601'* through
31 PR 165 be located, delineated, and evaluated for their eligibility to the NRI 11).
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National I listoric Preservation Act and the Advisory
Council on Ifistoric Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you li:lvr gtTt•slions concerning the above comment, contact
lienee Gledhill -Earley, environmrur,tl rrvit\v cuorc#url+or,:It')19 rlt)' 65 79 ur;=iro_�g i,dcr..goyv. fn
all future cctnutulnication concerning rliis hrt)ject, plea -:e cite the abw,c-refcrc•nced tracking numher.
SincerelN .
Ramona Bartos
V
Location: 109 Fast Junes Street, R.tletgh N(: 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 \lail Sen ice tenter, lialetgh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]'0/807-6599

APPENDIX G
ZONING INFORMATION

WaS�GppNtY Go•f
A
¢ Z
• s
i
PERSON COUNTY ° ON o,�S�r`�
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Person County Office Building, Room 212
304 South Morgan Street
Roxboro, North Carolina 27573-5245
[phone]
FAX [phone]
CLERK CERTIFICATION
PUBLIC HEARING:
PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS TO PERSON COUNTY'S ZONING
ORDINANCE:
A motion was made by Commissioner Puryear and carried 4-0 to open the duly
advertised public hearing for proposed text amendments to Person County's Zoning
Ordinance.
Planning Director, Mike Ciriello presented to the Board of Commissioners
proposed text amendments to Person County's Zoning Ordinance noting that the Person
County Department of Planning and Zoning was charged with the maintenance and
enforcement of the Person County Land Use and Zoning Ordinance. This responsibility
included ensuring that the document was reviewed and updated for errors, outdated
material, NC General Assembly mandated legislative changes, and to improve the ability
of the document to serve and protect the general public's health, safety and welfare.
Mr. Ciriello stated the most common concerns about the County's land use rules
are that the standards, definitions, and use tables are difficult to read and understand.
Concerns have also been raised about uses allowed in areas of the County that residents
assume are intended for "rural" and/or "residential" uses. Mr. Ciriello noted that while
the "Residential" (R) zoning district was delineated for, and written to accommodate,
"residential" uses almost exclusively; the same may not be said for the "rural
conservation" (RC) district. Mr. Ciriello said the RC district was the least restrictive
zoning district in the County. This means that almost any use was allowed and there are
no standards in place to provide physical buffers between uses that are frequently
incompatible. For example, commercial junkyards are allowed next to single-family
residential. In all cases, the impact on access, property values, safety and health
concerns, of a use and the design of the site should be carefully considered in the
County's rules.
Page 1 of 8

Mr. Ciriello told the group that the proposed text amendments are related to the
land use and design standards for industrial uses in the County. These changes emerged
from discussions with the County's economic development and industrial recruitment
staff and local industry leaders. Mr. Ciriello stated the goal of the proposed changes was
to make the process easier to implement for the consumer by generalizing and clarifying
the definition of industrial uses. Basically, modern "industrial" uses like precision
manufacturing, are allowed in any zoning district, except Residential (R), without the
need for a special use permit. Taken into account are issues related to the adjacency of
inharmonious uses and concerns expressed by land owners in the Rural Conservation
(RC) district. Planning and economic development staff and the Planning Board agree
that these may be mitigated with physical buffers, including the retention of existing
vegetation, while noise, odor and vibrations are mitigated by the distance separating
industrial property structures from residential property. For example, Mr. Ciriello said
heavy industrial uses would typically require a Special Use Permit and a maintained
vegetative buffer at least 150 -feet wide from a residential structure. For light industrial
uses, the requirement is a 50 -foot wide vegetative buffer. Mr. Ciriello noted these
standards are consistent with those in adjacent counties.
Mr. Ciriello stated the changes proposed are as outlined in four parts as listed
below:
PART l: Amended Appendix B: Definitions. Includes the addition of definitions
previously missing or required to support changes related to "Industrial Use";
PART 2: Amended Appendix C: Table of Permitted Uses. Amended to remove
individual "industrial uses" since these are now clustered into either "heavy" or, "light"
industrial uses;
PART 3: NOTE 2 Industrial and Manufacturing Operations. Note 2 was expanded to
give examples of "heavy" or, "light" industrial uses and provides interpretative
information for staff and consumers; and
PART 4: Amendments to the Zoning Ordinances' dimensional and design standards.
Mr. Ciriello noted the Person County Planning Board voted unanimously to
recommend approval of the proposed text amendments. Mr. Ciriello stated the Board of
Commissioners may elect to vote on these as a whole, or, vote on proposed text
amendments separately as outlined above.
Commissioner Clayton stated in Note 2 that Quarries and Mining are not included
under light or heavy industrial uses but are listed in the Table of Permitted Uses. Mr.
Ciriello confirmed for the group that Quarries should have been taken out and that it was
an oversight to which he would correct.
Page 2 of 8

Commissioner Clayton asked Mr. Ciriello if there was a requirement to pave all
parking lots. Mr. Ciriello noted the proposed text amendments did not include any
change for pavement as it is required for industrial uses. Mr. Ciriello further noted that in
any event where a Special Use Permit was requested, the Board would have an
opportunity to change the requirement. Mr. Ciriello explained that should the request be
a use by right and without a request for a Special Use Permit, the requirement as noted in
the ordinance would prevail. The difference in a use by right and a use that requires a
Special Use Permit is the impact the use can have on adjacent properties in terms of
health, safety and welfare of its landowners and their rights. Mr. Ciriello stated if there
was a request to change the design standards, a variance to the rule would go before the
County's Board of Adjustment.
Commissioner Clayton stated in Section 75 Table of Dimensional Requirements,
industrial uses located adjacent or across any right of way from residential properties, a
vegetative buffer was required. Commissioner Clayton voiced concerns of inserting strict
language on a buffer into the ordinance recalling two instances whereby a residential
property owner adjacent to the use did not want the vegetative buffer to restrict their line
of sight preferring the night lights to shine. Commissioner Clayton asked the County
Attorney for any language that may ease the requirement. County Attorney, Ron Aycock
stated consideration for language that allowed for a vegetative buffer in the case that a
structure presents an unreasonable hardship on adjacent properties. Mr. Ciriello and
Chairman Newell added the ordinance was in place to protect the current homeowners as
well as any future homeowners noting that if a use required a Special Use Permit, the
adjacent homeowners would have an opportunity to address the Board prior to the use
being approved. Mr. Ciriello further noted there was not a lot of landscaping required in
the standards; it requires one evergreen or deciduous tree for every 500 square feet.
Commissioner Clayton asked if someone with the Extension Service or Forestry
Service would be qualified to approve a landscape plan for the required vegetative buffer.
Mr. Ciriello said he had recommended private sector professionals for the evaluation of
existing vegetation that could be counted toward the buffer noting he was willing to add
equally qualified professionals with certification from the state.
Commissioner Jeffers noted the proposed amendments reference a fire inspector
and asked the County Manager if the County had a fire inspector. County Manager,
Heidi York noted the terminology had originally referenced a Fire Marshal to which she
asked Mr. Ciriello to change to a Fire Inspector. Ms. York noted the County has hired an
individual and he has been employed almost two weeks.
Chairman Newell apologized to the group for his late arrival to the meeting
(during Mr. Ciriello's presentation).
There were no individuals appearing before the Board to speak in favor nor in
opposition to the proposed text amendments to Person County's Zoning Ordinance.
Page 3of8

A motion was made by Commissioner Jeffers and carried 5-0 to close the public
hearing for proposed text amendments to Person County's Zoning Ordinance.
County Manager, Heidi York brought to the group's attention that Mr. Kenneth
Perry, Chairman of the Person County Economic Development Commission had
submitted written comments and a copy of his letter was placed at each commissioners'
seat.
CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS TO
PERSON COUNTY'S ZONING ORDINANCE:
A motion was made by Vice Chairman Kendrick and carried 5-0 to approve the
text amendments to Person County's Zoning Ordinance as presented by Mr. Ciriello
including all parts as follows:
PART l: Amended Appendix B: Definitions. Includes the addition of definitions
previously missing or required to support changes related to "Industrial Use";
PART 2: Amended Appendix C: Table of Permitted Uses. Amended to remove
individual "industrial uses" since these are now clustered into either "heavy" or, "light"
industrial uses;
PART 3: NOTE 2 Industrial and Manufacturing Operations. Note 2 (see chart below)
was expanded to give examples of "heavy" or, "light" industrial uses and provides
interpretative information for staff and consumers; and
PART 4: Amendments to the Zoning Ordinances' dimensional and design standards.
Page 4 of 8

NOTE 2 — INDUSTRIAL AND MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS
(Amended 3/18/96; 9/6/2016)
TYPE OF
INDUSTRIAL GENERAL DESCRIPTION, INTENT AND STANDARDS EXAMPLES OF USES
USE
Page 5 of 8
Light industrial uses are prohibited in the Residential
• Manufacture, assembly,
(R) District.
repair or servicing of light
industrial goods and
Uses in this category are a use by right unless located
products;
within 250' of a residential structure as measured from
business or consumer
the outside wall of any structure closest to the
machinery; equipment,
property line, inclusive of easements and rights of way.
products or by-products;
• Construction storage;
Uses that include structures located within 250' of an
. Commercial bakery;
adjacent residential use may be approved with a
. Crematorium;
special use permit.
• Cold storage plant;
• Coal sales and storage;
Vegetative and/or structural buffers shall be required
. Equipment rental;
when light industrial land uses are adjacent to or
• Exterminator;
across from, any residential use regardless of the
. Janitorial / building
distance separating uses (For additional information,
maintenance service;
Light
please see Setback Requirements — Section 75)
maintenance yard facility;
Industrial
(LI)
Typical uses may include offices, research and
• Manufacture, assembly
development laboratories; light, precision and/ or
and repair of computer
advanced manufacturing including manufacture,
components including
assembly and repair. Offices and light manufacturing
semi -conductors;
(secondary processing) are permitted as well as
precision instruments;
building materials storage and sales, self -storage, and
electrical electronic;
contractors and construction yards and distribution of
r
toys; solar and wind
goods produced on site.
energy components;
telecommunication
The intent of these categories is to provide
equipment; advancedtextiles;
development standards that promote the
transportation
development of industrial and manufacturing �
equipment components;
operations without compromising the health, safety
. Sheet mesal Shop;
and welfare of properties adjacent to and in the
• Bottling;
vicinity of the project area. Included in this category
' Storage area for
are uses that shall have minimal impacts on the public
manufacturing welding,
health, safety and welfare. (
machine and tool repair;
Page 5 of 8

Page 6 of 8
• Woodworking, cabinet
The distinctions used in this category closely follow the
making, and/or furniture
NAICS definitions. Manufacturing establishments are
manufacturing
located in plants, factories, or mills and employ power -
driven machines and materials -handling equipment.
They may also employ workers who create new
products by hand, without the characteristic
machinery -intensive enterprise. Many manufacturing
establishments process products of agriculture,
forestry, fishing, mining, or quarrying as well as
products of other manufacturing establishments. The
subcategories reflect sectors with distinct production
processes related to material inputs, production
equipment, and employee skills. Most manufacturing
establishments have some form of captive services
(e.g., research and development, and administrative
operations, such as accounting, payroll, or
management). These are functionally the same as the
primary establishment. However, when such services
are provided by separate establishments, they will be
evaluated as either light or heavy industrial in their
own right. If needed, Person County Planning and
Zoning staff should rely on the NAICS' activity
dimension to differentiate between an office activity
and a factory activity for such establishments.
Industrial operations involving the manufacturing,
processing, fabrication of acetylene gas (except for use
on premises), ammunition, explosives, fireworks,
gunpowder, or matches shall not be allowed in any
district. (Amended 5/18/92)
A special use permit shall be required for industrial
uses not specifically permitted as a "Use -By -Right"
in any district except Residential (R).
TYPE OF
INDUSTRIAL
GENERAL DESCRIPTION ;
EXAMPLES OF USES
USE
Page 6 of 8

The distinctions used in this category closely follow the
NAICS definitions. Manufacturing establishments are
located in plants, factories, or mills and employ power -
driven machines and materials -handling equipment.
They may also employ workers who create new
products by hand, without the characteristic
machinery -intensive enterprise. Many manufacturing
establishments process products of agriculture,
forestry, fishing, mining, or quarrying as well as
products of other manufacturing establishments. The
subcategories reflect sectors with distinct production
processes related to material inputs, production
equipment, and employee skills. Most manufacturing
establishments have some form of captive services
(e.g., research and development, and administrative
operations, such as accounting, payroll, or
management). These are functionally the same as the
Page 7 of 8
Heavy industrial uses are prohibited in the Residential
• Animal Processing,
(R) district.
Packing, Treatment and
Storage Livestock
Uses in this category would generally be consider a use
Slaughtering, Processing
by right unless the property line and/or operations and
of Food and Related
facilities are located within 2640' of a residential
Products
structure in any zoning district or if located in the Rural
. Production of Chemicals,
Conservation district.
Rubber, Leather, Clay,
Bone, Plastic, Stone,
This District is generally for those industrial uses where
Glass, Fertilizer
the impacts to the public health, safety and/or welfare
. Production of Fabrication
are greatest.
of Metals or Metal
Products (enameling,
These industrial uses typically have large land
galvanizing, sawmill)
requirements and require the outdoor storage of
• Asphalt and concrete
materials. In addition to most of the industrial uses
plants
permitted in the LI District, uses involving the primary
• Power generating plants,
processing of materials such as metal refining, plastics,
including the storage of
pulp and paper, animal rendering, clay sand or gravel
ore, coal, atmospheric
processing are permitted as of right.
gas, grain, petroleum and
Heavy
other materials used to
Industrial
The Director of Planning may use discretion to
produce power
(HI)
consider uses not specifically listed here as long as
. Hazardous material
these meet the intent of the definition. The Planning
disposal
Director shall provide a summary supporting of their
• Commercial wrecking,
interpretation for the record.
junk or salvage yard
The distinctions used in this category closely follow the
NAICS definitions. Manufacturing establishments are
located in plants, factories, or mills and employ power -
driven machines and materials -handling equipment.
They may also employ workers who create new
products by hand, without the characteristic
machinery -intensive enterprise. Many manufacturing
establishments process products of agriculture,
forestry, fishing, mining, or quarrying as well as
products of other manufacturing establishments. The
subcategories reflect sectors with distinct production
processes related to material inputs, production
equipment, and employee skills. Most manufacturing
establishments have some form of captive services
(e.g., research and development, and administrative
operations, such as accounting, payroll, or
management). These are functionally the same as the
Page 7 of 8

primary establishment. However, when such services
are provided by separate establishments, they will be
evaluated as either light or heavy industrial in their
own right. If needed, Person County Planning and
Zoning staff should rely on the NAICS' activity
dimension to differentiate between an office activity
and a factory activity for such establishments.
Industrial operations involving the manufacturing,
processing, fabrication of acetylene gas (except for use
on premises), ammunition, explosives, fireworks,
gunpowder, or matches shall not be allowed in any
district. (Amended 5/18/92)
A special use permit shall be required for industrial
uses not specifically permitted as a "Use -By -Right"
in any district except Residential (R).
1. Brenda B. Reaves, certify that 1 am the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of
Person County, and that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from the
minutes of a meeting of said Board held on the 6th day of September, 2016.
YVITNES.S, my fund and the official seal of Person County, this the 31st day of
October. 2016.
O �r V s
�� �v. 'ss,� .-�, tom• ...,_
SEAL.
Page 8 of 8
Brenda B. Reaves, NCCCC,
Clerk to the Board

APPENDIX C
TABLE OF PERMITTED USES
(Amended: 5/18/92; 11/17/92; 4/4/94; 7/11/94; 2/19/96; 6/3/96; 7/8/96; 5/5/97; 12/6/99; 5/4/2001; 12/1/2003;
6/6/2005;11/1/2004; 11/19/2007;11/3/2008;12/1/2008;4/20/2015;9/6/2016)
• Industrial and manufacturing operations are allowed as a use by right or with a special use permit in any
zoning district, except Residential (R). Please see NOTE 2 for additional information and standards.
• Districts in which particular uses are permitted as a Use -By -Right are indicated by "X". Districts in which particular
uses are permitted as a Use -By -Right with certain conditions are indicated by "X" with a reference to a footnote to
this Table.
• Districts in which particular uses are permitted as a conditional use upon approval of the Board of Adjustment are
indicated by "C". See Section 73 for details in obtaining a conditional use permit.
• District in which particular uses are permitted as a special use upon approval of the Board of Commissioners are
indicated by "S". See Section 74 for details in obtaining a Special Use Permit.
PRINCIPAL USES
ZONING DISTRICTS
R
B-2
B-1
GI IRC
ACCESSORY BUILDING
X
X
X
X X
ACCESSORY USES INCIDENTAL TO ANY PERMITTED USE (SEE NOTE 1)
X
X
X
X
ADOPTION SERVICES
X
X
ADVERTISING AGENCIES
X
X
X
AGRICULTURAL OR FARM USE EXEMPT FROM ZONING ORDINANCE
AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT, PARTS AND SUPPLIES (*SEE NOTE 5)
X
X* X
AIRLINE TICKET AGENCY (*SEE NOTE 5)
X
X
X* X
AIRPORT OPERATIONS (SEE SECTION 92 AND NOTE 5)
S
S
S
X* S
AIRSTRIPS, (PRIVATE) /HELIPORT WITHOUT COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY (*SEE NOTE
8)(ADDED 5/7/01)
X*
X*
X*
X* X*
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES PACKAGED, RETAIL SALE
X
X
X
AMBULANCE SERVICE OR RESCUE SERVICE
C
X
X
S X
AMUSEMENT PARKS
C
X
ANIMAL MEDICAL CARE (INCLUDING KENNEL OPERATIONS
C
X
X
ANTIQUE SHOPS
C
X
X
IX
APPAREL AND ACCESSORY SALES
X
X
X
APPLIANCE (MAJOR) SALES AND REPAIR
X
X
X
APPLIANCE (SMALL) SALES AND REPAIR
X
X
X
ART AND CRAFT SUPPLIES
X
X
X
ART GALLERY
X
X
X
AUCTION SALES (EXCLUDING LIVESTOCK AUCTIONING)
5
X
X
AUTOMOBILE OFF-STREET PARKING, (COMMERCIAL)
X
X
X X
AUTOMOBILE PARTS AND ACCESSORY SALES
X
X
X
AUTOMOBILE REPAIR AND/OR BODY WORK (EXCLUDING COMMERCIAL WRECKING,
DISMANTLING OR STORAGE OF JUNKED VEHICLES) (amended 12/1/2008)
X
5
AUTOMOBILE RENTALS AND LEASING (*SEE NOTE 5)
X
X
X* 'X
AUTOMOBILE SALES, NEW AND USED
C
X_
AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATION OPERATIONS
X
IX
X
BANK, SAVINGS AND LOAN COMPANY AND OTHER FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES
X
X
5X
BARBER OR BEAUTY COLLEGE INSTRUCTION
X
X
_
—_Ix
_
BARBERING AND HAIR DRESSING SERVICES
BED AND BREAKFAST INNS, BOARDING AND ROOMING HOUSES, AND TOURIST
HOMES
_
C
X
X
X
X ,
X
W
N
io
W
V
Z
Z
G
m
O
Z
Z
x
3
ts.
i` -
Z
:a
K�
NA

PRINCIPAL USES
ZONING DISTRICTS
R
B-2
I B-1
GI
IRC
BICYCLE SALES AND REPAIR
X
X
X
BLACKSMITH
C
X
BOATS AND ACCESSORIES, RETAIL SALES AND SERVICE
C
X
X
BOOKS AND PRINTED MATTER, DISTRIBUTION
X
X
BOOK STORES
X
X
X
BOWLING ALLEY
X
X
X
BRIDAL SHOPS
X
X
BUILDERS SUPPLY
X
X
BUS REPAIR AND STORAGE TERMINAL ACTIVITIES (amended 12/1/2008)
X
Is
BUS STATION ACTIVITIES (*SEE NOTE 5)
C
X
X*
X
CAMPER/RECREATIONAL PARK (Amended 8/2/2010)
S
S
S
S
CARPET AND RUG CLEANING
X
X
X
CARWASH
X
X
X
CATALOG SALES
X
Ix
X
CATERING
X
X
X
CELLULAR TELEPHONE SALES AND SERVICES
X
X
X
CEMETERIES - CHURCH OR FAMILY
X
X
X
S
X
CEMETERIES—COMMERCIAL
C
C
C
X
CHEMICAL RETAIL SALES
X
X
CHURCH, TEMPLES, SYNAGOGUES
C
C
C
S
X
CLINIC SERVICES, MEDICAL AND DENTAL
C
X
X
S
X
CLUB OR LODGE
C
C
C
X
COAL SALES AND STORAGE (amended 12/1/2008)
X
S
COLD STORAGE PLANT (amended 12/1/2008)
X
S
COMMERCIAL MODULAR BUILDING (ADOPTED 5/5/97)
X
X
X
COMPUTER SALES, AND/OR PROGRAMMING SERVICES
X
X
X
CONSTRUCTION, TRADES (*BUILDING, HEATING, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, FIRE
SPRINKLER AND OTHERS) (EXCLUDING OUTSIDE STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT OR
SUPPLIES) *amended 11/19/2007
C
X
X
X
CONSTRUCTION, TRADES (WITH OUTSIDE STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT OR SUPPLIES)
X
X
CONTRACTOR, GENERAL (EXCLUDING OUTSIDE STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT OR
SUPPLIES)
X
X
X
CONTRACTOR, GENERAL (WITH OUTSIDE STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT OR SUPPLIES)
X
X
CONVENIENCE STORES
C
X
X
X
COUNTY GOVERNMENTAL FACILITY (ADOPTED 2/3/97)
C
X
X
X
CURIO AND SOUVENIR SALES
X
X
X
DAY CARE CENTER
C
C
C
S
Ix
DRY CLEANING AND LAUNDRY
X
X
X
DWELLING, SINGLE-FAMILY
X
X
X
X
DWELLING, TWO-FAMILY AND GARAGE APARTMENTS
C
C
C
X
DWELLING, MULTIPLE -FAMILY (SEE SECTION 80)
S
S
S
X
EATING OR DRINKING FACILITIES (amended 12/1/2008)
X
X
S
ELECTRICAL/ ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLY SALES
X
X
X
EMPLOYMENT AGENCIES
X
X
X
EXPLOSIVE STORAGE AND DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES (AMENDED 5/18/92)
S
S
EXTERMINATING SERVICE
C
Ix
X
FAMILY CARE HOME
X
X
X
X
FARM MACHINERY SALES AND SERVICING
C
X
X
FARM SUPPLIES MERCHANDISING (EXCLUDING FARM MACHINERY)
X
X
X
FERTILIZER MANUFACTURE (amended 12/1/2008)
S
S
�o
O
N
o+
W
v
z
D
m
O
t?
z
x
5
CL
A
tj
z
0
LIC

PRINCIPAL USES
ZONING DISTRICTS
R B-2
I B-1 GI
IRC
FIRE STATION AND LAW ENFORCEMENT OPERATIONS
C X
X X
X
FLOOR COVERING SALES
X
X
X
FLOWER SHOP
X
X
X
FUNERAL HOME
C X
X
X
FURNITURE RETAIL SALES
X
X
X
GAME AND SPORTS FACILITIES (AMENDED 5-18-92)
5
S
GLASS SALES AND INSTALLATION
X
X
X
GOLF COURSES
C X
X
X
GROCERY RETAIL
X
X
X
GROCERY, WHOLESALE
ix
X
GROUP HOME FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED ADULTS
X X
X
X
GUNSMITH
X
X
X
HARDWARE, PAINT AND GARDEN SUPPLY SALES
X
X
X
HEALTH SPAS, FITNESS CENTER (amended 2/7/2011)
X
X
X
HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMERCIAL USE
C X
X
X
HOME FOR THE AGED
C C
X
X
HOME FURNISHINGS AND APPLIANCE SALES
X
X
X
HOSPITAL OR SANITARIUM CARE (EXCEPT FOR THE INSANE, FEEBLE-MINDED AND
ADDICTED) (amended 12/1/2008)
C
X
5
INDUSTRIAL
SEE NOTE 2
INSURANCE AGENCIES
X
Ix
X
INTERIOR DECORATOR
X
X
X
JANITORIAL SERVICE
X
X
X
JEWELERS
X
X
X
KARATE AND OTHER MARTIAL ARTS INSTRUCTION
X
X
X
KENNEL OPERATIONS, CARE
C
C
X
LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR
C
X
X
LIBRARY
C X
X
X
LIVESTOCK SALES AND AUCTIONS (amended 12/1/2008)
S
S
LOCKSMITH
X
X
X
MANUFACTURED HOME FOR TEMPORARY DWELLING DURING CONSTRUCTION OF SEE NOTE 7
PERMANET DWELLING ADOPTED 5/5/97
MANUFACTURING
SEE NOTE 2
MANUFACTURED HOME (INDIVIDUAL) FOR RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY -CLASS A
(REV. 5/5/97)
SEE NOTE 6
MANUFACTURED HOME (INDIVIDUAL) FOR RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY -CLASS B
(Rev. 5/5/97)
SEE NOTE 3
MANUFACTURED HOME (INDIVIDUAL) FOR RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY - CLASS C
(Rev. 5/5/97)
SEE NOTE 3
MANUFACTURE HOMES SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT SALES
1C
Ix I
Ix
MANUFACTURED HOMES UNDER THE HARDSHIP CLASS A, B AND C
SEE NOTE 4
MARINAS
X
Ix
X
MOBILE HOME PARK BUT EXCLUDING ANY MOBILE HOME SALES (AMENDED 11-17-
92,7/11/94)
S 5
5
S
MOBILE HOME SALES AND SERVICE
X
X
MODULAR HOMES (AMENDED 11-17-92)
X X
X
X
MONUMENT SALES
X
X
X
MOTEL, HOTEL OR MOTOR COURT OPERATIONS
X
X
MOVIES, VIDEO SALES AND RENTALS
Ix
Ix
Ix

PRINCIPAL USES
ZONING DISTRICTS
R
B-2
B-1
GI
IRC
MOVING AND STORAGE OPERATIONS (amended 12/1/2008)
X
S
S
MUSICAL INSTRUMENT SALES
X
X
X
NEWSSTAND SALES
X
X
X
NONHAZARDOUS, NON-TOXIC SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL (ADOPTED 5-18-92)
S
S
S
S
S
NURSERY OPERATION (PLANT) - AGRICULTURAL
X
X
X
X
NURSING HOME
C
C
C
X
OFFICE AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (ADOPTED 12/6/99)
C
X
X
X
X
OFFICE SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT SALES AND SERVICE
X
X
X
PAINTING CONTRACTORS
X
X
X
PAVING CONTRACTORS (amended 12/1/2008)
S
PAWN SHOP
X
X
X
PET SALES, EXCLUDING KENNEL ACTIVITIES OR OUTSIDE STORAGE OF ANIMALS
X
X
X
PHARMACEUTICAL SALES, RETAIL
X
X
X
PHOTOGRAPHY, COMMERCIAL
X
X
X
PLANNED BUILDING GROUP (SEE ARTICLE VIII, SECTION 80) (ADDED 12/1/03)
S
X
X
S
POST OFFICE
X
X
X
X
PRIVATE RECREATION CLUB OR SWIMMING CLUB ACTIVITIES NOT OPERATED AS A
BUSINESS OR PROFIT (amended 12/1/2008)
C
C
C
S
S
PRIVATE RECREATION FACILITIES FOR PROFIT (AMENDED 5/18/92, 7/8/96)
S
S
S
S
S
PUBLIC RECREATIONS (SUCH AS COMMUNITY CANTER BUILDINGS, PARKS,
MUSEUMS, PLAYGROUNDS, AND SIMILAR FACILITIES OPERATED ON A NONPROFIT
BASIS)
C
C
C
X
PUBLIC UTILITY STATION, BULK STATION OR SUBSTATIONS (amended 12/1/2008)
C
C
C
S
S
PUBLIC UTILITY WORKS, SHOPS OR STORAGE YARDS
X
QUARRY OPERATIONS
S
S
RADIO OR TELEVISION STUDIO ACTIVITIES ONLY
X
X
RADIO, TELEPHONE AND TV TRANSMITTING TOWER
(SEE ARTICLE VII & IX) (AMENDED 11/6/95) (*SEE NOTE 9)
S
X
X
X
S
RAILROAD STATION OPERATIONS (amended 12/1/2008)
C
S
S
RAILROAD YARD OPERATIONS
S
X
REAL ESTATE AGENCIES
X
X
Ix
RECEPTION CENTERS FOR RECYCLING
C
X
X
REDUCING SALON CARE
X
X
X
REPAIR, RENTAL AND/OR SERVICING OF ANY PRODUCT THE RETAIL SALE OF WHICH
IS A USE -BY -RIGHT IN THE SAME DISTRICT AND NOT OTHERWISE LISTED HEREIN
X
X
X
REST HOMES
C
C
C
X
RETAILING OR SERVICING OPERATIONS
C
X
ix
SALVAGE OPERATION/JUNKYARD - COMMERCIAL
S
S
SECOND HAND AND SWAP SHOP SALES
X
X
X
SCHOOL, PRIVATE OR PUBLIC (ELEMENTARY, SECONDARY, OR HIGHER LEVEL)
(amended 12/1/2008)
C
C
X
X
C
SPORT SHOPS
X
X
X
STABLES, HORSE (AMENDED 4/4/94)
X
S
X
STEREOPHONIC AND HIGH FIDELITY EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLY SALES
X
X
X
STORAGE, COAL BY PRODUCTS
S
C
STORAGE, FLAMMABLE (amended 12/1/2008)
C
S
C
ST0RACE, A j0L!'i, TOXIC .1 YND RAIJ!0AC . E Vv AST
ilii)T VEi;'vlII D 1:V !ANY D1STRICT
STORAGE, HOUSEHOLD AND COMMERCIAL
C
X
Ix
STORAGE, OPEN (amended 5-4-01)
1C
1C
Is

PRINCIPAL USES
ZONING DISTRICTS
R
B-2
I B-1
GI
IRC
TANNING SALONS
X
X
X
TAXICAB STAND OPERATIONS (*SEE NOTE 5)
X
X
X*
X
TEACHING OF ART, MUSIC, DANCE, DRAMATICS, OR OTHER FINE ARTS
C
X
X
X
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION BUILDING (Amended 6/6/2005)
X
X
X
X
X
THEATER PRODUCTIONS
S
X
X
X
TIRE RECAPPING
X
X
TIRE SALES CENTERS
X
X
X
TOBACCO SALES
X
X
X
TRAVEL AGENCIES (*SEE NOTE 5)
X
X
X*
X
TRUCK STOP
X
TRUCK TERMINAL ACTIVITIES REPAIR AND HAULING AND/OR STORAGE
X
VARIETY, GIFT AND HOBBY SUPPLY SALES
X
X
X
X
WINERY (ADDED 11/1/2004)
S
X
WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTION OF BUILDING AND REMODELING PRODUCTS (REVISED
6/3/96)
X
X
X
X
WHOLESALE SALES WITH OPERATIONS CONDUCTED AND MERCHANDISE STORED
ENTIRELY WITHIN A BUILDING AND NOT OTHERWISE LISTED HEREIN
ix
ix
ix
Ix
NOTES TO THE TABLE OF PERMITTED USES
NOTE 1- HOME OCCUPATIONS
(Amended 9/7/94,3/18/96)
A home occupation is an occupation carried on in a dwelling unit or accessory building in accordance
with the following.
1. The use is an incidental use to the residential property.
2. The home occupation shall not generate significantly greater volumes of traffic
than would be expected in that residential neighborhood.
3. No more than one (1) person other than the resident of the dwelling are to be
engaged in the home occupation.
4. No more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the total heated floor area of the
principal structure shall be used for the home occupation.
5. One hundred percent (100%) of an accessory structure may be used for the
home occupation: (1) if located to the side or the back of the principal
structure; and (2) the total floor area of the accessory structure does not
exceed fifty percent (50%) of the gross floor area of the principal structure.
6. The exterior of any structure (principal or accessory) shall not be built or
altered in any manner nor shall the occupation be conducted in such as way as

to cause the premises to substantially differ from its' residential character in
exterior appearance.
7. The outside storage or exterior display of merchandise, products or materials,
is prohibited.
8. Required parking for a home occupation shall be met off the street and not in
a required front or side yard setback.
9. Signage shall comply with Article XII, Section 125.
10. All residential properties served by a well and/or sewage disposal system must
have said systems evaluated (when applicable) in accordance with North
Carolina General Statutes and local regulations.
11. The use shall not emit any obnoxious or offending noise, dust, vibration, odor,
smoke, fumes, glare, electrical interference, interference to radio or television
reception beyond what normally occurs in the applicable zoning district, and
shall not present a fire hazard.
12. The on premise sale and delivery of goods which are not produced on the
premises is prohibited, except in the case of the delivery and sale of goods
incidental to the provision of a service.

NOTE 2 — INDUSTRIAL AND MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS
(Amended 3/18/96; 2016)
TYPE OF
INDUSTRIAL
USE
GENERAL DESCRIPTION, INTENT AND STANDARDS
EXAMPLES OF USES
Light industrial uses are prohibited in the Residential (R) District.
• Manufacture, assembly, repair
or servicing of light industrial
Uses in this category are a use by right unless located within 250'
goods and products;
of a residential structure as measured from the outside wall of any
business or consumer
structure closest to the property line, inclusive of easements and
machinery; equipment,
rights of way.
products or by-products;
• Construction storage;
Uses that include structures located within 250' of an adjacent
• Commercial bakery;
residential use may be approved with a special use permit.
• Crematorium;
• Cold storage plant;
Vegetative and/or structural buffers shall be required when light
. Coal sales and storage;
industrial land uses are adjacent to or across from, any residential
. Equipment rental;
use regardless of the distance separating uses (For additional
• Exterminator;
information, please see Setback Requirements—Section 75)
• Janitorial / building
maintenance service;
Typical uses may include offices, research and development
maintenance yard facility;
laboratories; light, precision and/ or advanced manufacturing
. Manufacture, assembly and
including manufacture, assembly and repair. Offices and light
repair of computer
manufacturing (secondary processing) are permitted as well as
components including semi -
building materials storage and sales, self -storage, and contractors
conductors; precision
and construction yards and distribution of goods produced on site.
instruments; electrical /
electronic; toys; solar and wind
Light
The intent of these categories is to provide development
energy components;
Industrial (LI)
standards that promote the development of industrial and
telecommunication equipment;
manufacturing operations without compromising the health,
advanced textiles;
safety and welfare of properties adjacent to and in the vicinity of
transportation equipment
the project area. Included in this category are uses that shall have
components;
minimal impacts on the public health, safety and welfare.
• Sheet metal shop;
The distinctions used in this category closely follow the NAICS
• Bottling;
definitions. Manufacturing establishments are located in plants,
• Storage area for manufacturing
factories, or mills and employ power -driven machines and
welding, machine and tool
materials -handling equipment. They may also employ workers
repair;
who create new products by hand, without the characteristic
• Woodworking, cabinet making,
machinery -intensive enterprise. Many manufacturing
and/or furniture manufacturing
establishments process products of agriculture, forestry, fishing,
mining, or quarrying as well as products of other manufacturing
establishments. The subcategories reflect sectors with distinct
production processes related to material inputs, production
equipment, and employee skills. Most manufacturing
establishments have some form of captive services (e.g., research
and development, and administrative operations, such as
accounting, payroll, or management). These are functionally the
same as the primary establishment. However, when such services
are provided by separate establishments, they will be evaluated as
either light or heavy industrial in their own right. If needed,
Person County Planning and Zoning staff should rely on the NAICS'
to
O
N
a+
W
V
az
2
0
m
O
0
z
R
z
a
z
0
V
O
W
n:
W
IL

APPENDIX C
TABLE OF PERMITTED USES
(Amended: 5/18/92; 11/17/92; 4/4/94; 7/11/94; 2/19/96; 6/3/96; 7/8/96; 5/5/97; 12/6/99; 5/4/2001; 12/1/2003;
6/6/2005;11/1/2004; 11/19/2007;11/3/2008; 12/1/2008;4/20/2015;9/6/2016)
• Industrial and manufacturing operations are allowed as a use by right or with a special use permit in any
zoning district, except Residential (R). Please see NOTE 2 for additional information and standards.
• Districts in which particular uses are permitted as a Use -By -Right are indicated by "X". Districts in which particular
uses are permitted as a Use -By -Right with certain conditions are indicated by "X" with a reference to a footnote to
this Table.
• Districts in which particular uses are permitted as a conditional use upon approval of the Board of Adjustment are
indicated by "C". See Section 73 for details in obtaining a conditional use permit.
• District in which particular uses are permitted as a special use upon approval of the Board of Commissioners are
indicated by "S". See Section 74 for details in obtaining a Special Use Permit.
PRINCIPAL USES
ZONING DISTRICTS
R
B-2
B-1
GI
IRC
ACCESSORY BUILDING
X
X
X
X
X
ACCESSORY USES INCIDENTAL TO ANY PERMITTED USE (SEE NOTE 1)
X
X
X
X
ADOPTION SERVICES
X
X
ADVERTISING AGENCIES
X
X
X
AGRICULTURAL OR FARM USE EXEMPT FROM ZONING ORDINANCE
AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT, PARTS AND SUPPLIES (*SEE NOTE 5)
X
X*
X
AIRLINE TICKET AGENCY (*SEE NOTE 5)
X
X
X*
X
AIRPORT OPERATIONS (SEE SECTION 92 AND NOTE 5)
S
S
S
X*
S
AIRSTRIPS, (PRIVATE) /HELIPORT WITHOUT COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY (*SEE NOTE
8)(ADDED 5/7/01)
X*
X*
X*
X*
X*
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES PACKAGED, RETAIL SALE
X
X
X
AMBULANCE SERVICE OR RESCUE SERVICE
C
X
X
S
X
AMUSEMENT PARKS
C
X
ANIMAL MEDICAL CARE (INCLUDING KENNEL OPERATIONS
C
X
X
ANTIQUE SHOPS
C
X
X
X
APPAREL AND ACCESSORY SALES
X
X
X
APPLIANCE (MAJOR) SALES AND REPAIR
X
X
X
APPLIANCE (SMALL) SALES AND REPAIR
X
X
X
ART AND CRAFT SUPPLIES
X
X
X
ART GALLERY
X
X
X
AUCTION SALES (EXCLUDING LIVESTOCK AUCTIONING)
S
X
X
AUTOMOBILE OFF-STREET PARKING, (COMMERCIAL)
X
X
X
X
AUTOMOBILE PARTS AND ACCESSORY SALES
X
X
X
AUTOMOBILE REPAIR AND/OR BODY WORK (EXCLUDING COMMERCIAL WRECKING,
DISMANTLING OR STORAGE OF JUNKED VEHICLES) (amended 12/1/2008)
X
S
AUTOMOBILE RENTALS AND LEASING (*SEE NOTE 5)
X
X
X*
X
AUTOMOBILE SALES, NEW AND USED
C
X
X
AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATION OPERATIONS
X
X
X
BANK, SAVINGS AND LOAN COMPANY AND OTHER FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES
X
X
S
X
BARBER OR BEAUTY COLLEGE INSTRUCTION
X
X
IX
BARBERING AND HAIR DRESSING SERVICES
X
X
X
BED AND BREAKFAST INNS, BOARDING AND ROOMING HOUSES, AND TOURIST
HOMES
C
X
X
0
N
io
a+
W
V
Z
I
0
m
O
12
Z
a
a
Z
0
O
W
Z
0
Vt
ae
W
d

PRINCIPAL USES
ZONING DISTRICTS
R
B-2
13-1
GI
IRC
BICYCLE SALES AND REPAIR
X
X
Ix
BLACKSMITH
C
Ix
BOATS AND ACCESSORIES, RETAIL SALES AND SERVICE
C
X
Ix
BOOKS AND PRINTED MATTER, DISTRIBUTION
X
X
BOOK STORES
X
X
X
BOWLING ALLEY
X
X
X
BRIDAL SHOPS
X
X
BUILDERS SUPPLY
X
X
BUS REPAIR AND STORAGE TERMINAL ACTIVITIES (amended 12/1/2008)
X
S
BUS STATION ACTIVITIES (*SEE NOTE 5)
C
X
X*
X
CAMPER/RECREATIONAL PARK (Amended 8/2/2010)
S
S
S
S
CARPET AND RUG CLEANING
X
ix
X
CARWASH
X
X
X
CATALOG SALES
X
X
X
CATERING
X
X
X
CELLULAR TELEPHONE SALES AND SERVICES
X
X
X
CEMETERIES - CHURCH OR FAMILY
X
X
X
S
X
CEMETERIES—COMMERCIAL
C
C
C
X
CHEMICAL RETAIL SALES
X
X
CHURCH, TEMPLES, SYNAGOGUES
C
C
C
S
X
CLINIC SERVICES, MEDICAL AND DENTAL
C
X
X
S
X
CLUB OR LODGE
C
C
C
X
COAL SALES AND STORAGE (amended 12/1/2008)
Ix
S
COLD STORAGE PLANT (amended 12/1/2008)
X
S
COMMERCIAL MODULAR BUILDING (ADOPTED S/5/97)
X
X
X
COMPUTER SALES, AND/OR PROGRAMMING SERVICES
X
X
X
CONSTRUCTION, TRADES (*BUILDING, HEATING, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, FIRE
SPRINKLER AND OTHERS) (EXCLUDING OUTSIDE STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT OR
SUPPLIES) *amended 11/19/2007
C
X
X
X
CONSTRUCTION, TRADES (WITH OUTSIDE STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT OR SUPPLIES)
X
Ix
CONTRACTOR, GENERAL (EXCLUDING OUTSIDE STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT OR
SUPPLIES)
X
X
X
CONTRACTOR, GENERAL (WITH OUTSIDE STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT OR SUPPLIES)
X
X
CONVENIENCE STORES
C
X
X
X
COUNTY GOVERNMENTAL FACILITY (ADOPTED 2/3/97)
C
X
X
X
CURIO AND SOUVENIR SALES
X
Ix
X
DAY CARE CENTER
C
C
C
S
X
DRY CLEANING AND LAUNDRY
X
X
ix
DWELLING, SINGLE-FAMILY
X
X
X
X
DWELLING, TWO-FAMILY AND GARAGE APARTMENTS
C
C
C
X
DWELLING, MULTIPLE -FAMILY (SEE SECTION 80)
S
S
S
X
EATING OR DRINKING FACILITIES (amended 12/1/2008)
X
X
S
ELECTRICAL / ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLY SALES
X
X
X
EMPLOYMENT AGENCIES
X
X
X
EXPLOSIVE STORAGE AND DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES (AMENDED 5/18/92)
S
S
EXTERMINATING SERVICE
C
X
X
_
FAMILY CARE HOME �V
X
X
X
X
FARM MACHINERY SALES AND SERVICING _
C
X
Ix
FARM SUPPLIES MERCHANDISING (EXCLUDING FARM MACHINERY)
X
X
X
FERTILIZER MANUFACTURE (amended 12/1/2008)
S
S

PRINCIPAL USES
ZONING DISTRICTS
R B-2
I B-1 GI
IRC
FIRE STATION AND LAW ENFORCEMENT OPERATIONS
C X
X X
X
FLOOR COVERING SALES
X
X
X
FLOWER SHOP
X
X
X
FUNERAL HOME
C X
X
X
FURNITURE RETAIL SALES
X
X
X
GAME AND SPORTS FACILITIES (AMENDED 5-18-92)
S
S
GLASS SALES AND INSTALLATION
X
X
X
GOLF COURSES
C X
X
X
GROCERY RETAIL
X
X
X
GROCERY, WHOLESALE
X
X
GROUP HOME FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED ADULTS
X X
X
X
GUNSMITH
X
X
X
HARDWARE, PAINT AND GARDEN SUPPLY SALES
X
X
X
HEALTH SPAS, FITNESS CENTER (amended 2/7/2011)
X
X
X
HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMERCIAL USE
C X
X
X
HOME FOR THE AGED
C C
X
X
HOME FURNISHINGS AND APPLIANCE SALES
X
X
X
HOSPITAL OR SANITARIUM CARE (EXCEPT FOR THE INSANE, FEEBLE-MINDED AND
ADDICTED) (amended 12/1/2008)
C
X
S
INDUSTRIAL
SEE NOTE 2
INSURANCE AGENCIES
X
Ix
X
INTERIOR DECORATOR
X
X
X
JANITORIAL SERVICE
X
X
X
JEWELERS
X
X
X
KARATE AND OTHER MARTIAL ARTS INSTRUCTION
X
X
X
KENNEL OPERATIONS, CARE
C
C
Ix
LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR
C
X
X
LIBRARY
C X
X
X
LIVESTOCK SALES AND AUCTIONS (amended 12/1/2008)
S
S
LOCKSMITH
X
X
X
MANUFACTURED HOME FOR TEMPORARY DWELLING DURING CONSTRUCTION OF
PERMANET DWELLING ADOPTED 5/5/97)
SEE NOTE 7
MANUFACTURING
SEE NOTE 2
MANUFACTURED HOME (INDIVIDUAL) FOR RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY -CLASS A
(REV. 5/5/97)
SEE NOTE 6
MANUFACTURED HOME (INDIVIDUAL) FOR RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY -CLASS B
(Rev.5/5/97)
SEE NOTE 3
MANUFACTURED HOME (INDIVIDUAL) FOR RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY - CLASS C
(Rev. 5/S/97)
SEE NOTE 3
MANUFACTURE HOMES SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT SALES
1C
X I
Ix
MANUFACTURED HOMES UNDER THE HARDSHIP CLASS A, B AND C
SEE NOTE 4
MARINAS
X
X
X
MOBILE HOME PARK BUT EXCLUDING ANY MOBILE HOME SALES (AMENDED 11-17-
92,7/11/94)
S
S
S
S
MOBILE HOME SALES AND SERVICE
X
X
MODULAR HOMES (AMENDED 11-17-92)
X
X
X
X
MONUMENT SALES
X
X
X
MOTEL, HOTEL OR MOTOR COURT OPERATIONS
X
X
MOVIES, VIDEO SALES AND RENTALS
X
X
X
cp
O
N
tD
a+
W
v
z
D
m
O
0
rcz
o.
z
O
v
z
O
FA
m
W
d

PRINCIPAL USES
ZONING DISTRICTS
R
B-2
B-1
GI
IRC
MOVING AND STORAGE OPERATIONS (amended 12/1/2008)
X
S
S
MUSICAL INSTRUMENT SALES
X
X
X
NEWSSTAND SALES
X
X
X
NONHAZARDOUS, NON-TOXIC SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL (ADOPTED 5-18-92)
S
S
S
S
S
NURSERY OPERATION (PLANT) - AGRICULTURAL
X
X
X
X
NURSING HOME
C
C
C
X
OFFICE AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (ADOPTED 12/6/99)
C
X
X
X
X
OFFICE SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT SALES AND SERVICE
X
X
X
PAINTING CONTRACTORS
X
X
X
PAVING CONTRACTORS (amended 12/1/2008)
1
is
PAWN SHOP
X
X
X
PET SALES, EXCLUDING KENNEL ACTIVITIES OR OUTSIDE STORAGE OF ANIMALS
X
X
X
PHARMACEUTICAL SALES, RETAIL
X
X
X
PHOTOGRAPHY, COMMERCIAL
X
X
X
PLANNED BUILDING GROUP (SEE ARTICLE VIII, SECTION 80) (ADDED 12/1/03)
S
X
X
S
POST OFFICE
X
X
X
X
PRIVATE RECREATION CLUB OR SWIMMING CLUB ACTIVITIES NOT OPERATED AS A
BUSINESS OR PROFIT (amended 12/1/2008)
C
C
C
S
S
PRIVATE RECREATION FACILITIES FOR PROFIT (AMENDED 5/18/92, 7/8/96)
S
S
S
S
S
PUBLIC RECREATIONS (SUCH AS COMMUNITY CANTER BUILDINGS, PARKS,
MUSEUMS, PLAYGROUNDS, AND SIMILAR FACILITIES OPERATED ON A NONPROFIT
BASIS)
C
C
C
X
PUBLIC UTILITY STATION, BULK STATION OR SUBSTATIONS (amended 12/1/2008)
C
C
C
S
S
PUBLIC UTILITY WORKS, SHOPS OR STORAGE YARDS
X
QUARRY OPERATIONS
S
S
RADIO OR TELEVISION STUDIO ACTIVITIES ONLY
X
X
RADIO, TELEPHONE AND TV TRANSMITTING TOWER
(SEE ARTICLE VII & IX) (AMENDED 11/6/95) (*SEE NOTE 9)
S
X
X
X
S
RAILROAD STATION OPERATIONS (amended 12/1/2008)
C
S
S
RAILROAD YARD OPERATIONS
I
S
X
REAL ESTATE AGENCIES
X
X
X
RECEPTION CENTERS FOR RECYCLING
C
X
X
REDUCING SALON CARE
X
X
X
REPAIR, RENTAL AND/OR SERVICING OF ANY PRODUCT THE RETAIL SALE OF WHICH
IS A USE -BY -RIGHT IN THE SAME DISTRICT AND NOT OTHERWISE LISTED HEREIN
X
X
X
REST HOMES
C
C
C
X
RETAILING OR SERVICING OPERATIONS
C
X
X
SALVAGE OPERATION/JUNKYARD - COMMERCIAL
S
S
SECOND HAND AND SWAP SHOP SALES
X
X
X
SCHOOL, PRIVATE OR PUBLIC (ELEMENTARY, SECONDARY, OR HIGHER LEVEL)
(amended 12/1/2008)
C
C
X
X
C
SPORT SHOPS
X
X
X
STABLES, HORSE (AMENDED 4/4/94)
X
S
X
STEREOPHONIC AND HIGH FIDELITY EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLY SALES
X
X
X
STORAGE, COAL BY PRODUCTS
S
C
STORAGE, FLAMMABLE (amended 12/1/2008)
C
S
IC
STORAGE, HAZARDOUS, TOXIC AND RAMOACTIVE WASTE
NOT PERMITTE' + IN ANY DISTRICT
STORAGE, HOUSEHOLD AND COMMERCIAL
1C
X
I
Ix
STORAGE, OPEN (amended 5-4-01)
1C
1C
I
Is

PRINCIPAL USES
ZONING DISTRICTS
R
B-2
I B-1
GI
IRC
TANNING SALONS
X
X
X
TAXICAB STAND OPERATIONS (*SEE NOTE 5)
X
X
X*
X
TEACHING OF ART, MUSIC, DANCE, DRAMATICS, OR OTHER FINE ARTS
C
X
X
X
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION BUILDING (Amended 6/6/2005)
X
X
X
X
X
THEATER PRODUCTIONS
S
X
X
X
TIRE RECAPPING
X
X
TIRE SALES CENTERS
X
X
X
TOBACCO SALES
X
X
X
TRAVEL AGENCIES (*SEE NOTE 5)
X
X
X*
X
TRUCK STOP
I
X
TRUCK TERMINAL ACTIVITIES REPAIR AND HAULING AND/OR STORAGE
X
VARIETY, GIFT AND HOBBY SUPPLY SALES
X
X
X
X
WINERY (ADDED 11/1/2004)
S
X
WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTION OF BUILDING AND REMODELING PRODUCTS (REVISED
6/3/96)
X
X
X
X
WHOLESALE SALES WITH OPERATIONS CONDUCTED AND MERCHANDISE STORED
ENTIRELY WITHIN A BUILDING AND NOT OTHERWISE LISTED HEREIN
I
IX
IX
IX
IX
NOTES TO THE TABLE OF PERMITTED USES
NOTE 1- HOME OCCUPATIONS
(Amended 9/7/94, 3/18/96)
A home occupation is an occupation carried on in a dwelling unit or accessory building in accordance
with the following.
1. The use is an incidental use to the residential property.
2. The home occupation shall not generate significantly greater volumes of traffic
than would be expected in that residential neighborhood.
3. No more than one (1) person other than the resident of the dwelling are to be
engaged in the home occupation.
4. No more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the total heated floor area of the
principal structure shall be used for the home occupation.
5. One hundred percent (100%) of an accessory structure may be used for the
home occupation: (1) if located to the side or the back of the principal
structure; and (2) the total floor area of the accessory structure does not
exceed fifty percent (50%) of the gross floor area of the principal structure.
6. The exterior of any structure (principal or accessory) shall not be built or
altered in any manner nor shall the occupation be conducted in such as way as

to cause the premises to substantially differ from its' residential character in
exterior appearance.
7. The outside storage or exterior display of merchandise, products or materials,
is prohibited.
8. Required parking for a home occupation shall be met off the street and not in
a required front or side yard setback.
9. Signage shall comply with Article XII, Section 125.
10. All residential properties served by a well and/or sewage disposal system must
have said systems evaluated (when applicable) in accordance with North
Carolina General Statutes and local regulations.
11. The use shall not emit any obnoxious or offending noise, dust, vibration, odor,
smoke, fumes, glare, electrical interference, interference to radio or television
reception beyond what normally occurs in the applicable zoning district, and
shall not present a fire hazard.
12. The on premise sale and delivery of goods which are not produced on the
premises is prohibited, except in the case of the delivery and sale of goods
incidental to the provision of a service.

NOTE 2 — INDUSTRIAL AND MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS
(Amended 3/18/96; 2016)
TYPE OF
INDUSTRIAL
USE
GENERAL DESCRIPTION, INTENT AND STANDARDS
EXAMPLES OF USES
Light industrial uses are prohibited in the Residential (R) District.
• Manufacture, assembly, repair
or servicing of light industrial
Uses in this category are a use by right unless located within 250'
goods and products;
of a residential structure as measured from the outside wall of any
business or consumer
structure closest to the property line, inclusive of easements and
machinery; equipment,
rights of way.
products or by-products;
• Construction storage;
Uses that include structures located within 250' of an adjacent
. Commercial bakery;
residential use may be approved with a special use permit.
• Crematorium;
• Cold storage plant;
Vegetative and/or structural buffers shall be required when light
. Coal sales and storage;
industrial land uses are adjacent to or across from, any residential
. Equipment rental;
use regardless of the distance separating uses (For additional
. Exterminator;
information, please see Setback Requirements —Section 75)
• Janitorial / building
maintenance service;
Typical uses may include offices, research and development
maintenance yard facility;
laboratories; light, precision and/ or advanced manufacturing
. Manufacture, assembly and
including manufacture, assembly and repair. Offices and light
repair of computer
manufacturing (secondary processing) are permitted as well as
components including semi -
building materials storage and sales, self -storage, and contractors
conductors; precision
and construction yards and distribution of goods produced on site.
instruments; electrical /
electronic; toys; solar and wind
Light
The intent of these categories is to provide development
energy components;
Industrial (LI)
standards that promote the development of industrial and
telecommunication equipment;
manufacturing operations without compromising the health,
advanced textiles;
safety and welfare of properties adjacent to and in the vicinity of
transportation equipment
the project area. Included in this category are uses that shall have
components;
minimal impacts on the public health, safety and welfare.
• Sheet metal shop;
The distinctions used in this category closely follow the NAICS
• Bottling;
definitions. Manufacturing establishments are located in plants,
• Storage area for manufacturing
factories, or mills and employ power -driven machines and
welding, machine and tool
materials -handling equipment. They may also employ workers
repair;
who create new products by hand, without the characteristic
• Woodworking, cabinet making,
machinery -intensive enterprise. Many manufacturing
and/or furniture manufacturing
establishments process products of agriculture, forestry, fishing,
mining, or quarrying as well as products of other manufacturing
establishments. The subcategories reflect sectors with distinct
production processes related to material inputs, production
equipment, and employee skills. Most manufacturing
establishments have some form of captive services (e.g., research
and development, and administrative operations, such as
accounting, payroll, or management). These are functionally the
same as the primary establishment. However, when such services
are provided by separate establishments, they will be evaluated as
either light or heavy industrial in their own right. If needed,
Person County Planning and Zoning staff should rely on the NAICS'

activity dimension to differentiate between an office activity and a
factory activity for such establishments.
Industrial operations involving the manufacturing, processing,
fabrication of acetylene gas (except for use on premises),
ammunition, explosives, fireworks, gunpowder, or matches shall
not be allowed in any district. (Amended 5/18/92)
A special use permit shall be required for industrial uses not
specifically permitted as a "Use -By -Right" in any district except
Residential (R).
TYPE OF
INDUSTRIAL
GENERAL DESCRIPTION
EXAMPLES OF USES
USE
Heavy industrial uses are prohibited in the Residential (R) district.
• Animal Processing, Packing,
Treatment and Storage
Uses in this category would generally be consider a use by right
Livestock Slaughtering,
unless the property line and/or operations and facilities are
Processing of Food and Related
located within 2640' of a residential structure in any zoning district
Products
or if located in the Rural Conservation district.
• Production of Chemicals,
Rubber, Leather, Clay, Bone,
This District is generally for those industrial uses where the
Plastic, Stone, Glass, Fertilizer
impacts to the public health, safety and/or welfare are greatest.
. Production of Fabrication of
Metals or Metal Products
These industrial uses typically have large land requirements and
(enameling, galvanizing,
require the outdoor storage of materials. In addition to most of
sawmill)
the industrial uses permitted in the LI District, uses involving the
• Asphalt and concrete plants
primary processing of materials such as metal refining, plastics,
• Power generating plants,
pulp and paper, animal rendering, clay sand or gravel processing
including the storage of ore,
Heavy
are permitted as of right.
coal, atmospheric gas, grain,
Industrial
petroleum and other materials
(HI)
The Director of Planning may use discretion to consider uses not
used to produce power
specifically listed here as long as these meet the intent of the
. Hazardous material disposal
definition. The Planning Director shall provide a summary
• Commercial wrecking, junk or
supporting of their interpretation for the record.
salvage yard
The distinctions used in this category closely follow the NAICS
definitions. Manufacturing establishments are located in plants,
factories, or mills and employ power -driven machines and
materials -handling equipment. They may also employ workers
who create new products by hand, without the characteristic
machinery -intensive enterprise. Many manufacturing
establishments process products of agriculture, forestry, fishing,
mining, or quarrying as well as products of other manufacturing
establishments. The subcategories reflect sectors with distinct
production processes related to material inputs, production
equipment, and employee skills. Most manufacturing
establishments have some form of captive services (e.g., research

and development, and administrative operations, such as
accounting, payroll, or management). These are functionally the
same as the primary establishment. However, when such services
are provided by separate establishments, they will be evaluated as
either light or heavy industrial in their own right. If needed,
Person County Planning and Zoning staff should rely on the NAICS'
activity dimension to differentiate between an office activity and a
factory activity for such establishments.
Industrial operations involving the manufacturing, processing,
fabrication of acetylene gas (except for use on premises),
ammunition, explosives, fireworks, gunpowder, or matches shall
not be allowed in any district. (Amended 5/18/92)
A special use permit shall be required for industrial uses not
specifically permitted as a "Use -By -Right" in any district except
Residential (R).
Industrial Additions:
1. If otherwise in compliance with applicable provisions of the ordinance and other rules or
regulations, the Zoning Administrator may approve or approve with conditions an
application to expand a principal structure, or parking and circulation areas, by not more
than 10 percent (10%) of those respective areas as reflected in a Special Use approved by
the Board of Commissioners, or as in existence at the time zoning became effective as to
the zoning lot, whichever is applicable. This ten percent limitation shall apply whether
reached in one increment or in more than increment over time.
Prior to making a final decision on any such application, the applicant shall cause notice
of the proposal in a form approved by the Administrator to be given by first class mail to
all property owners within five (500) feet, as shown on the County's tax records, of the
zoning lot. The Zoning Administrator shall afford the notified property owners ten (10)
days within which to comment before mailing a final decision on the application. The
Zoning Administrator shall notify the Planning Boards at its next regular meeting of any
application approved or approved with conditions under this section.
If, in the judgment of the Zoning Administrator, the application presents significant issues
affecting the public health, safety and welfare, he/she shall refer the application to the
Planning Board for approval, denial, or approved with conditions. In such cases, the
applicant shall cause notice of the Planning Board meeting in a form approved by the
Zoning Administrator to be
given by first class mail to all property owners within five hundred (500) feet, as shown
on the County's tax records, of the zoning lot.
2. If otherwise in compliance with applicable provisions of this ordinance and other rules or
regulations, the Planning Board May approve an application to expand a principal
structure, or parking and circulation areas, by not more than fifteen percent (15%) of
those respective areas as reflected in a Special Use approved by the Board of

Commissioners, or as in existence at the time zoning became effective as to the zoning
lot, whichever is applicable. This fifteen percent limitation shall apply whether reached in
one increment or in more than one increment over time.
NOTE 3 - MANUFACTURED HOMES, CLASS B AND CLASS C
(See Note 6 for Manufactured Homes, Class A)
(Amended 7/11/94, 11/6/95, 5/5/97)
A'Class B' manufactured home shall be a permitted use in the Residential (R) and Rural
Conservation (RC) Zoning Districts provided that:
(1) The exterior finish is in good repair and the exterior materials are comparable in composition,
appearance and durability to the exterior siding commonly used in standard residential
construction. Acceptable materials for the exterior of such homes include but are not limited to
vinyl or aluminum horizontal lap siding (whose reflectivity does not exceed that of gloss white
paint), wood, or hardboard.
(2) The manufactured home is set up in accordance with the standards set by the North Carolina
Department of Insurance and a continuous, permanent masonry foundation or masonry curtain
wall, unpierced except for required ventilation and access, is installed under the perimeter of
the manufactured home;
(3) The roofing materials are compatible with those used in standard residential construction;
(4) The wheels, axles, transporting lights and towing apparatus have been removed
(5) Stairs, porches, entrance platforms and other means of entrance and exit to the home are
installed or constructed in accordance with the North Carolina State Building Code, Volume VU -
Residential.
A Class B manufactured home meeting conditions 1 through 5 above shall be a conditional use in
the Highway Business (B-1) and Neighborhood Business (B-2) Zoning Districts except when located
within a mobile home park.
A Class C manufactured home meeting conditions 1 through 5 above shall be a conditional use in
the Residential (R) and Rural Conservation (RC) Zoning Districts and
shall not be permitted in the Highway Business (B-1) nor Neighborhood Business (B-2) Zoning
Districts except when located within a mobile home park.
Class B and Class C manufactured homes may be used only for residential purposes and may not be
used for storage accessory buildings, utility buildings nor shops.
All standards of this ordinance must be met before a Certificate of Compliance is issued by the
Person County Inspection Department.

Class B and Class C manufactured homes not meeting requirements (1) through (5) above may be
located in a mobile home park subject to the provisions of the Person County Mobile Home Park
Ordinance. (Rev. 5/5/97)
NOTE 4 - MANUFACTURED HOMES, HARDSHIP
The Board of Adjustment may grant temporary permits for placing mobile homes for dwelling
purposes to the rear or side of a dwelling located on a residential lot in certain hardship cases when
the Board of Adjustment finds that:
(1) The person or persons occupying the mobile home are physically dependent
upon the person or persons occupying the dwelling house, or that the person
or persons occupying the dwelling house are physically dependent upon the
person or persons occupying the mobile home.
(2) The water and sewage facilities are approved by the District Health
Department.
(3) One of the following types of relationships exists between the occupants of
the manufactured home and the occupants of the principal dwelling unit:
1. Blood relationship.
2. Relationship by marriage.
3. Legal guardian relationship established by law.
4. The attendant is compensated for his or her services and is providing care
for not more than two related persons.
(4) The manufactured home meets requirements 1 through 5 in NOTE 3
MANUFACTURED HOMES, CLASS B AND CLASS C in APPENDIX C, NOTES TO
THE TABLE OF PERMITTED USES.
The permit shall expire after one (1) year and shall be renewable upon similar findings by the Zoning
Administrator or by the Board of Adjustment. When the hardship ceases to exist, the permit shall
automatically be revoked and the mobile home removed. When
any of the terms, conditions, or restrictions imposed on the conditional use are not being complied
with, the Zoning Administrator shall rescind and revoke such permits
after notifying all parties concerned by letter and granting full opportunity for a public hearing.
Any mobile home approved by the Board of Adjustment under the hardship provisions prior to the
date of this amendment shall be included in the above restrictions with regard to expiration of
permits after one (1) year from the date of issuance and all such permits shall be renewed within
one (1) year of the date of this amendment. (Rev. 5/5/97)

NOTE 5 - AIRPORT OVERLY
1. Use specifically permitted only in the Airport Overlay, provided in accordance with applicable
ordinance provisions.
NOTE 6 - MANUFACTURED HOMES, CLASS A
A Class A manufactured home shall be a permitted use in the Residential (R), Highway Business (13-
1). Neighborhood Business (B-2) and Rural Conservation (RC) Zoning Districts provided that:
(1) The manufactured home is listed and assessed as real property;
(2) All roof structures shall provide an eaves projection of no less than six inches, which may
include a gutter;
(3) The exterior siding consists predominantly of vinyl or aluminum horizontal lap siding (whose
reflectivity does not exceed that of gloss white paint), wood, or hardboard, comparable in
composition, appearance and durability to the exterior siding commonly used in standard
residential construction;
(4) The manufactured home is set up in accordance with the standards set by the N.C.
Department of Insurance and a continuous, permanent masonry foundation or masonry
curtain wall, unpierced except for required ventilation and access, is installed under the
perimeter of the manufactured home;
(5) Stairs, porches, entrance platforms, ramps and other means of entrance and exit to and from
the home shall be installed or constructed in accordance with standards set by the North
Carolina State Building Code, Volume Vll - Residential; and
(6) The moving hitch, wheels and axles, and transporting lights have been removed.
A Class A manufactured home may be used only for residential purposes and may not be used for
storage, accessory buildings, utility buildings nor shops. All standards of this ordinance must be met
before a Certificate of Compliance is issued by the Person County Inspection Department.
A Class A manufactured home not meeting criteria (1) through (6) above may be located in a mobile
home park subject to provisions of the Person County Mobile Home Park Ordinance.
(Adopted 5/5/97)
NOTE 7 - MANUFACTURED HOME FOR TEMPORARY DWELLING DURING CONSTRUCTION OF A
PERMANENT DWELLING
The Board of Adjustment may grant a conditional use permit to allow the temporary placement of a
manufactured home for dwelling purposes on a lot during construction or installation of a
permanent residential unit on that lot provided that:

(1) A building permit has been issued for construction of the permanent home;
(2) The construction of the permanent home is started within six (6) months from placement of
the manufactured home on the lot and is completed within three (3) years from the date of
approval of the conditional use permit. At the discretion of the Board, the duration of the
conditional use permit may be extended a maximum of five (5) years from the date of
approval of the permit to allow completion of the permanent home;
(3) The exterior finish is in good repair and the exterior materials are comparable in
composition, appearance and durability to the exterior siding commonly used in standard
residential construction. Acceptable materials for the exterior of such homes include but are
not limited to vinyl or aluminum horizontal lap siding (whose reflectivity does not exceed
that of gloss white paint), wood, or hardboard; and
(4) The manufactured home is set up in accordance with the standards set by the North Carolina
Department of Insurance.
The manufactured home must be removed from the lot within thirty (30) days following issuance of
the Certificate of Occupancy of the permanent home.
Should any of the terms, conditions or restrictions imposed on the conditional use permit be
violated, the Zoning Administrator shall rescind and revoke such permits after notifying by letter all
parties concerned and granting them full opportunity of a hearing. When such a conditional use
permit is revoked, the manufactured home for which it was issued must be removed from the
property within thirty (30) days after the revocation is final. (Adopted 5/5/97)
NOTE 7A — TEMPORARY EMERGENCY USE OF CAMPER/RECREATIONAL VEHICLE
(Added 8/2/2010)
Temporary emergency use of a camper/recreational vehicle is allowed for a period of six months in
the event of a fire, flood or other natural disaster which has made the principal dwelling
uninhabitable. The temporary use must be located on the same lot and a zoning permit is required.
The zoning permit may be renewed for one additional six month period.
The Board of Adjustment may grant a Conditional Use Permit to allow the temporary use of a
camper/recreational vehicle for dwelling purposes during the construction or installation of a
permanent residential unit provided that:
1. A building permit has been issued for construction of the permanent home
2. Approval is for a period of one year. Appiicant shall only be allowed one
reapplication for the same lot.

3. The camper/recreational vehicle cannot be used for residential purposes on the same
lot once the certificate of occupancy is issued or the time allowed by the Conditional
Use Permit has expired.
NOTE 8 — PRIVATE AIR STRIP/HELIPORT (ADDED MAY 7, 2001)
Private airstrip/heliport without commercial activity. No zoning permit required.
NOTE 9 — RADIO, TELEPHONE AND TV TRANSMITTING TOWER
Towers located in 61, B2 or GI Districts require a Special Use Permit if located adjacent to a
residential use.
Setbacks for Radio, Telephone and TV Transmitting Towers will be equal to the height of the
tower unless the fall -zone is certified to be less than the height of the tower.
Lattice towers, or self-supporting towers, with a triangular base tapered to the top and
engineered with break-points may be setback a distance Y their height
At a minimum, towers in all Districts are subject to the standards of the Table of Dimensional
Requirements (Table 75; page 64).
There are no height limitations for towers except as specified by the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) in the vicinity of the Person County Airport.

APPENDIX H
ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY

tH, STATE;:` :.
_Z
>:
1�_e
"t *FSS QUAM 'J"-*
ROY COOPER
t.. i"dill
ANTHONY M. COPELAND
JACQUELINE KEENER
Economic Impact of a new Semiconductor Device
Manufacturing Facility in Person County, NC
INTRODUCTION
This report estimates the economic contributions and impacts of the planned construction of a new
semiconductor device manufacturing facility in Person County, North Carolina. The purpose of this
report is to provide information related to the potential economic impact of particular industry
activities. Results are estimates, and are derived from inputs provided by the involved companies
and in some cases based on forecast.
ANALYSIS ASSUMPTIONS & METHODOLOGY
Commerce uses IMPLAN1 software for economic impact modeling. The IMPLAN model is widely used
by local, state, and federal government agencies as well as private industry and universities. The
following section summarizes the data and assumptions used in developing the economic impact
model for this project in Person County.
PROIECT DETAILS AND MODEL ASSUMPTIONS
Location of Projects / Economic Impact Area: Person County, NC and surrounding counties
IMPLAN Sector - Sustained Operations: 309 - Semiconductor and related device manufacturing
IMPLAN Sector - Temporary Operations: 53 - Construction of new manufacturing structures
Investment in Temporary Construction Operations: $1,750,000,000
New Project jobs: 4,000
ECONOMIC IMPACTS
While economic modeling can provide general information about how an economy will react as a
result of a particular event or occurrence, future economic performance will vary with economic
conditions. Economic modeling should be used in conjunction with other forms of analysis to
estimate overall project merits and drawbacks. This project consists of two analysis components: 1)
impacts associated with constructing/renovating facilities and 2) impacts associated with ongoing
operations. As suggested by the IMPLAN model, all construction investment is expected to come from
North Carolina vendors or inputs. All impacts are presented as regional impacts with monetary
figures presented in 2017 dollars.
IMPLAN Group, loc. was founded in 1993 by Scott L_indall and Doug Olson as an outgrowth of their work at the
University of Minnesota starting in 1984. This developmental work closely involved the U.S. Forest Service's Land
Management Planning Unit in Fort Collins, and Dr. Wilbur Maki at the University of Minnesota. For more information
please visit Nww.MAPLAN.corn.
Raletuh. N

KEY ECONOMIC IMPACT DEFINITIONS
Direct Impacts: The known or predicted change in the economy that is being studied. In this analysis the direct impacts
are the changes associated with the project site.
Indirect Impact: Secondary impact caused to industries in the supply chain of the direct impact In this case, indirect
impacts would result from industries supplying resources and materials.
Induced Impact: Direct and indirect employment (and increases in labor income) creates additional household spending
on goods and services.
Employment: The number of full-time and part-time jobs; measured by place of employment. Employees, sole proprietors,
and active partners are included, but unpaid family workers and volunteers are not
Value Added: is a measure of the contribution of each private industry and of government to a region's Gross Domestic
Product It is defined as an industry's gross output (which consists of sales or receipts and other operating income,
commodity taxes, and inventory change) minus its intermediate inputs (which consist of energy, raw materials, semi-
finished goods, and services that are purchased from domestic industries or from foreign sources).
Output: is the amount of production, including all intermediate goods purchased as well as value added (compensation and
profit).
lob -Years: IMPLAN measures employment impacts in job -years with each unit of employment equivalent to one job for
one year. This is important when IMPLAN is used to measure construction or other non -permanent operations. For
example, IMPLAN does not distinguish between ten units of employment (workers) employed over five years, and fifty
workers employed in one year. Therefore, one construction worker may account for multiple units of employment if that
person is employed over multiple years.
ECONOMIC IMPACTS FROM ONGOING OPERATIONS
ONGOING EMPLOYMENT IMPACTS
In this section, we analyze the impact of adding 4,000 jobs to the Person County economy, which a
new semiconductor device manufacturing facility has estimated will result from the company's
project.
When complete, the ongoing, annual employment impact of the new facility will result in
approximately 7,870 jobs in the Person County area. Some of these jobs are direct company jobs
(4,000). These direct project jobs create an additional 3,870 jobs in the region through indirect and
induced effects. Many of the additional jobs occur in sectors directly impacted by semiconductor
device manufacturing, like wholesale trade and investigation and security services. Other jobs occur
in sectors that support the direct employees of this project, including restaurants and real estate.
ONGOING IMPACTS TO THE REGION'S ECONOMY
Upon completion the project, the ongoing, annual direct economic impact will result in an increase
of the region's gross domestic product by approximately $1.1 billion. Total regional output, including
indirect and induced effects, will increase by $2.5 billion as a result of the project.
Table 1: Annual, OngoinlE, Economic Impacts
Direct Effect 4,000 $880,000,000 $2,035,000,000
Indirect Effect
2,300
$139,000,000
$289,000,000
Induced Effect
1,570
$102,000,000
$186,00,000
Total Effect
7,870
$1,121,OOG,000
$2,510,000,000
Source: MIG IMPLAN 3.1; model created January 2017.
All monetary impacts presented in 2017 dollars and rounded to the nearest million;
Employment impacts rounded to the nearest five.
Sums of effects may not add to Total Effects due to rounding error.
tinrrtI r. i! hin,i Grnartmenr :-d Cc,mmr•n � Labor and Lronoinu lnalvsis Division
t i,11) Mai I S(; \ n ;.Center i Raleigh. NC )�hyy -4 ML)
,,ll) i(I, I')0U

TEMPORARY ECONOMIC IMPACTS FROM CONSTRUCTION
TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT IMPACTS
In this section, we analyze the temporary impact of constructing the manufacturing facility in Person
County. The company has estimated that approximately $1.75 billion will be invested in the
construction of their new facility. This analysis considers only the construction of the facility and
does not include any associated infrastructure construction.
Approximately 19,495 total jobs (including indirect and induced effects) will result from
construction investments in the project, with roughly 16,010 directly needed in the construction
industry.z It is important to recognize that the jobs associated with this project's construction are not
permanent, continuous jobs. Rather, when the projects are complete, the employment demands
created by project construction will cease.
TEMPORARY IMPACTS TO THE REGION'S ECONOMY
Upon completion of the project, the construction investment is estimated to positively impact the
region's gross domestic product by $1.1 billion and increase output by $2.2 billion.
Table 2: Construction Investment Economic Impacts
Impact Type Employment Value Added D• Output
Direct Effect 16,010 $843,000,000 $1,750,000,000
Indirect Effect 99S $64,000,000 $139,000,000
Induced Effect 2,490 $161,000,000 $295,000,000
Total Effect 19,495 $1,068,000,000 $2,184,000,000 1
Source: MIG IMPLAN 3.1; model created January 2017.
All monetary impacts presented in 2017 dollars and rounded to the nearest million;
Employment impacts rounded to the nearest five.
Sums of effects may not add to Total Effects due to rounding error.
Disclaimer: Economic modeling providesgeneral impact estimatesfor economic development projects.
However, future results will be affected by political, social, and economic conditions. Economic modeling
is most informative when used with other forms of analysis, such as cost -benefit analysis and fiscal
impact analysis, to estimate the overall impact ofeconomic changes. The use ofinputs from the company
does not endorse, confirm, or support the methodology or assumptions used in deriving estimates
relating to the project.
2 IMPLAN measures employment impacts in job -years with each unit of employment equivalent to one job for one year.
For example, IMPLAN does not distinguish between ten units of employment (workers) employed over five years, and fifty
workers employed in one year. Therefore, one construction worker may account for multiple units of employment if that
person is employed over multiple years.
Noi noiw v nm -w If _II), _r nowl. ''Ni"11" n')I\l­m

APPENDIX I
N.C. DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES COORESPONDANCE

Anna Reusche
From: Williams, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 4:23 PM
To: Anna Reusche
Subject: Person County Mega Park response letter for DMS ILF request
Attachments: Person County Mega Park Roanoke.pdf
Anna -
Attached please find a conditional response letter from the Division of Mitigation Services for the in -lieu fee mitigation request for the above -referenced
project. As you anticipated, this acceptance is contingent on the regulatory agencies approving our offer to provide credits outside the 03010104 HUC in an
adjacent Roanoke HUC if credits are not available in the HUC. I've referenced the IRT memo that conveys this information to DMS staff as well. At present DMS
has most of the needed credits available in the 04 HUC, but may not at the time payment is made. I'm happy to discuss the inventory and options with the COE
if that's preferred.
If you would like the original letter sent by mail to the applicant, please let me know. Once DMS receives the permits associated with the project from the
applicant/agent, we will generate an invoice based on the mitigation amounts specified in the permits. This acceptance letter expires in six months. If an
extension to this acceptance letter is needed, please let me know prior to its expiration. We appreciate the opportunity to provide this service to our
customers. Don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Information about DMS programs can be found on the DMS Website.
Sincerely,
Kelly
Kelly Williams
In -Lieu Fee Program Coordinator
Division of Mitigation Services
Department of Environmental Quality
919 707 8915 office
[e-mail]
US Postal Service Address:
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652

Mitigation Services
EN IR611ME A TAL QUAL I TV
October 24, 2018
David Newell
PCBIC
PO Box 1824
Roxboro, NC 27573
Project: Person County Mega Park
ROY COOPER
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Expiration of Acceptance: 2/24/2019
County: Person
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin Impact Location Impact Type Impact Quantity
(8 -digit HUC)
Roanoke 03010104" Warm Stream 10,529
Roanoke03010104" Riparian Wetland 1.94
*In accordance with the January 14, 2014 NCIRT memo addressing mitigation for impacts in the Roanoke,
DMS proposes to provide credit in Roanoke 03010103, 03010104 or 03010102. Upon receipt of payment,
DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be performed in
accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and 15A NCAC 026 .0295 as
applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions
or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc Anna Reusche, agent
Sincerely,
111� 14
. 4V
Jaine1. B Stanfill
Asket?"Janagement Supervisor
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Mitigation Services
16.52 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 217 W Jones Street, Suite 3000
919 707 8976 T

APPENDIX J
DUKE ENERGY LETTER OF SUPPORT

"if DUKE
'PC ENERGY.
March 1, 2018
Person County Business Industrial Center
Mr. Stuart Gilbert
304 South Morgan Street
Roxboro, NC 27573
SUBJECT: Electrical infrastructure information for the Person County Mega Site
Dear Stuart:
I am responding to your request regarding the unique electric service attributes of the Person
County Mega Site. As we have discussed in the past, this site has a multiple transmission lines
on site that currently have capacity to meet electric demands in the 250 to 300 MW range. We
are currently aware of only handful of sites that can meet this level of demand in North
Carolina.
The availability of transmission capacities and voltages, are a result of the site's close proximity
to the Roxboro Steam Station. Multiple 230 KV transmission circuits cross the site and a 115 kV
source is south. In addition, these sources are capable of meeting large demands of electric
service from multiple directions, that could provide redundant electric service that enhance
power quality to a customer. Power quality is vital to the types of industries targeted for this
site.
I continue to stand ready to assist person County in attract a customer to this site. I commend
you and Person County for your continued commitment to this site. Please call if there are any
questions.
Sincerely:
John Nelms
Economic Development Manager

APPENDIX K
SECONDARY AND CUMULATIVE IMPACT ANALYSIS

.�0*000
40 0 5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
T I M M O N S GROUP Suite 102 www.timmons.com
Raieiah, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
PERSON COUNTY MEGA -PARK
CUMULATIVE AND SECONDARY IMPACT ASSESSMENT
October 30, 2018
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Person County Mega -Park (Project) is a future development proposed by
Person County Business and Industrial Center, Inc. (Applicant). The proposed
Project is situated on an approximately 318 -acre site and is located approximately 5
miles north of Roxboro in Person County, North Carolina. The purpose of the
Project is to develop the Person County Business and Industrial Park to
accommodate a semiconductor fabrication chip plant as well as associated roadway
and utility improvements. Person County (County) has identified the proposed
mega -park as an economic development priority, which will serve to bring
significant economic relief to the citizens of the County.
The proposed Person County Mega Park layout is comprised of an approximate 3.5
million square feet central operations facility to house the clean room,
manufacturing spaces, office spaces, mechanical yard, vehicular load deck areas and
associated parking.
Current land use at the Project Site includes both forested and maintained areas.
Forested areas on the site are characterized as pine and mixed hardwood
communities. Maintained areas at the Project Site include agricultural fields used
for grazing cattle, one single-family home, and an electrical transmission easement.
Land use surrounding the proposed mega park is predominately comprised of
undeveloped forested lands interspersed with agricultural fields and single-family
residential homes.
To accomplish the goals of the Project, approximately 10,529 linear feet and 1.94
acres of direct waters/wetlands impacts are proposed. Therefore, the Applicant has
submitted an Individual Permit Request for impacts to wetlands/Waters of the U.S.
(waters) associated with the Project.
As part of this permitting process, existing rules for the North Carolina 401 Water
Quality Certification Program (15A NCAC 2H .0506(b)(4) and (c)(4)) requires that
the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) determine that the Project
"does not result in cumulative impacts, based upon past or reasonably anticipated
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL i SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES
1 of 7

5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
T I M M O N S GROUP Suite 102 www.timmons.com
Raleiah, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
future impacts, that cause or will cause a violation of downstream water quality
standards."
Cumulative impacts are defined by the North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (NCDWQ) as those "environmental impacts resulting from
incremental effects of an activity when added to other past, present, and reasonably
foreseeable future activities regardless of what entities undertake such other
actions". Cumulative effects can occur from individually minor but collectively
significant activities taking place over a period of time (Figure 1).
Proposed
Project
Impact
Cumulative
Past P Future
Actions Impact Impact on
Individual Impact
Resource
* Reasonably foreseeable;
Impact includes indirect actions
Mer
Present
Actio
Figure 1. Cumulative Impact Diagram
Source: "Questions and Answers Regarding the Consideration of Indirect and Cumulative Impacts in the NEPA Process", FHWA, 2014.
In addition, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) defines secondary impacts,
also known as indirect impacts, as "those that are caused by an action and are later
in time and farther removed in distance but still foreseeable." Secondary impacts
cannot occur without the implementation of the proposed Project but are not a
direct impact of the Project (see Figure 2). Secondary impacts are considered part
of the overall cumulative impact on a resource.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ( CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES
2of7

5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
T I M M O N S GROUP Suite 102 www.timmons.com
Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS,
Direct
Project Action Environmental
Impacts
Indirect
Proiect Accton Related Actions Environmental
Impacts
Figure 2. Direct and Secondary (Indirect) Impact Diagram
Source: "Questions and Answers Regarding the Consideration of Indirect and Cumulative Impacts in the NEPA Process", FHWA, 2014.
DWQ 401 Certification guidelines provide a relatively narrow provision that
cumulative impacts be examined in terms of their impact on downstream water
quality standards and their associated uses. Therefore, project related cumulative
impacts are only of concern if impacts will cause a violation of downstream water
quality standards within the context of DWQ's wetland permitting program.
The following assessment provides considerations of the Cumulative and Secondary
Impacts (SCI) to wetlands/waters and downstream water quality resources
associated with the proposed Person County Mega -Park.
2.0 SECONDARY IMPACTS
To accomplish the goals of the Project, direct impacts to jurisdictional
wetlands/waters are unavoidable. The Project proposes approximately 10,529
linear feet of direct stream impacts and 1.94 acres of direct wetlands impacts. These
direct impacts include the fill of wetlands and streams and the redirection of
streams through culverts and piping.
Secondary impacts to water quality resources are generally linked to fill impacts
within jurisdictional wetlands/waters. The secondary impacts that can result
generally include changes in downstream wetland functions and/or changes in the
physical/biological characteristics of a water resource downstream of the direct
impact. The most likely secondary impacts to occur in connection with the types of
direct impacts associated with this propose Project are summarized in Table 1.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ' CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES
3 of 7

5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
T I M M O N S GROUP Site 102 www.timmons.com
Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
Table 1. Project related Direct Impacts and possible Secondary Impacts
Direct Impact
Secondary Impact
- Changes in hydrology
Filling a portion of a
- Creation of disturbed/non-wetland conditions
"edge"
wetland/water
- Fragmentation/Creation of new
- Interruption of migratory routes
- Introducing human activity (noise, disturbance, etc.)
Installing a culvert or
-Alteration of water levels or flow patterns
changing existing culvert
Stream relocations
- Changes in flow characteristics
New stormwater discharge
- Alteration of water levels or flow patterns
locations
- introduce sediments or nutrients.
The proposed Project has minimized the possibility of these secondary impacts
through implementation of planning practices which reduce the influence of direct
impacts on downstream water quality. These efforts include:
1. Avoidance/minimization of direct wetlands/waters impacts through
innovative site planning and utilization of confirmed wetland delineation
2. Minimization of partial wetland/stream impacts
3. Minimization of impacts to primary drainage ways and floodplains
4. Strict adherence to all state and local stormwater and sediment control
measures
Although secondary impacts may occur, the overall scope and nature of these
impacts are believed to be minimal in comparison with the overall scope of the
proposed Project. Therefore, secondary impacts are not expected to significantly
contribute to overall cumulative impacts or cause a violation of downstream water
quality standards.
3.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
The cumulative impacts of an action may be undetectable but can add to other
disturbances and eventually lead to a measurable environmental change. Within the
context water quality, impairment associated with cumulative impacts are usually
tied to stormwater runoff that can increase with land development activities, based
on the current and future planned land uses.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES
4 of 7

5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
T I M M O N S GROUP Suite 102 www.timmons.com
Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
3.1 Geographic Area
The proposed Project is situated on approximately 318 acres comprised of both
wooded and agricultural fields. Land use surrounding the proposed mega -park is
predominately comprised of undeveloped forested lands interspersed with
agricultural fields and single family residential homes. The proposed mega -park is
located in the Roanoke watershed (Hydrologic Unit Code [HUC] 03010104) and all
surface waters drain to Story's Creek and Marlowe Creek, located along the western
and eastern property boundaries respectively. The Project area is located at the
most downstream extent of the Story's Creek subwatershed (HUC 030101040602)
and ultimately drains to the Hyco River downriver of impoundment at Hyco Lake.
The Site contains a 100 -year floodplain that are generally located adjacent to the
major perennial stream features onsite (Story's Creek and Marlowe Creek).
3.2 Affected Resources
The primary resources of concern in this cumulative impact evaluation include
those features which are integral to onsite and downstream water quality. These
features include the main drainage features which occur onsite and immediately
downstream. The NC Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) provides Stream Index
Numbers for these features as follows:
• Story's Creek: 22-58-12-(5)
• Marlowe Creek: 22-58-12-6
• Hyco River: 22-58-(9.5)
All these waterways have a NCDWR Primary Stream Classification of 'C' indicating
they meet the minimum state waterway standard for fishable / swimmable waters
but are not intended as a drinking supply and/or primary recreation water.
The ecological condition of rivers and streams is dependent on the state of their
watersheds and therefore the streams and rivers surrounding the Project area have
previously been influenced and compromised by past development. Practices such
as agriculture, silviculture, residential development, and introduction of invasive
species have resulted in the degradation of these waterways. In addition, the
surrounding agricultural land uses and placements of farm ponds at headwaters
have likely adversely affected stream water quality, habitat, and biological
communities through increased sedimentation, larger inputs of nutrients (e.g.,
nitrogen, phosphorous) and pollutants (e.g., heavy metals, synthetic chemicals, toxic
organics), and altered stream hydrology. As a result of these historic landscape
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES
5 of 7

•'!!s®!
0 4* 0 5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
T I M M O N S GROUP Site 102 www.timmons.com
Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
alterations, these water resources likely now typically experience higher peak flows
resulting in channel scouring and widening.
3.3 Future Development
The proposed Project will likely increase overall development in the Project area.
However, the proposed Project would support and facilitate planned growth
designed to improve the economic condition of Person County. The proposed
Project is consistent with local and regional land use plans (Person County Land Use
Plan, 2001. Person County & Roxboro Comprehensive Transportation Plan, 2011.
Person County Farmland Preservation Plan, 2016, NCDOC Economic Impact Study,
2017). In addition, the Project is consistent with the current zoning and is
considered a permitted use. Additionally, there are no specific future development
activities currently known that would be dependent on the Project and would not
proceed without the proposed Project. Any additional future development would
likely occur as infilling, which will limit any potential cumulative impacts. In
addition, since stormwater regulations will continue to evolve, future water
resource conditions in the Project area will likely benefit from the implementation
of improved stormwater treatment and detention measures for any new
developments.
The proposed Project may also result in increases in pollutant loads and, changes in
existing hydrology to streams within and downstream of the Project area. However,
these impacts will be mitigated through strict adherence to all state and local
stormwater and erosion and sediment control measures (see Erosion Control Plan
for details). These measures are designed to reduce runoff, nutrients, and sediment.
In addition, these measures will generally provide sufficient controls to allow
downstream resources to retain preconstruction hydrological conditions.
Furthermore, some aspect of downstream water quality will likely be improved by
the proposed project through the removal of Project lands from agricultural actives.
A 2001 article by Michael Paul and Judy Meyer in the Annual Review of Ecology and
Systematics, entitled "Streams in the urban landscape," demonstrates that
agricultural activities are the primary cause of stream impairment. This is because
agricultural land use adversely affects stream water quality, habitat, and biological
communities while urbanization primarily only causes changes to stream hydrology,
sediment supply, and water chemistry.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES
6 of 7

• 0 0000 0
0 0 i 5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
T I M M O N S GROUP Suite 102 www.timmons.com
Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
4.0 Conclusions
Although cumulative and secondary impacts are likely to occur as a result of the
proposed Project, these impacts should be minimal as a result of appropriate land
planning and strict adherence to all state and local stormwater regulation and
sediment and erosion controls. The overall scope and nature of these impacts are
believed to be minimal in comparison with the overall nature of the proposed
Project. Therefore, cumulative and secondary impacts are not expected to cause a
violation of downstream water quality standards in association with the proposed
Person County Mega -Park.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS
SERVICES
7of7
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION

APPENDIX L
SITE CRITERIA EVALUATION AND COMPARISON TABLE
(INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CH2M HILL)

Site Selection Matrix Requirements
Optimal Characteristics
Person County Site
Optimal Score
Person County
Location
Regional Population (1 hr. commute)
> 300,000
Adequate
8
8
Regional Airport
30-60 minutes
Raleigh/Durham
8
8
Direct Access
Easy Directions
Direct Route Not Clear
5
2
Interstate
< 5 miles
>-10 Miles
8
4
Access from Interstate
Multiple Accesses
Direct from Hwy 501
5
4
Mass Transit Access
Available at the site
None
2
0
Technology Universities
Regional
Research Triangle
5
5
Silicon Experienced Workforce
Regional
Past Companies in
Region
5
4
Regional Electronic Managers
Silicon related
Good Representation
6
5
Region Recruitability
Quality of Life and Spousal
Employement
Excellent
4
4
Training Ability
Technology operators and
technicians
Needs to be Identified
4
4
Site Characteristics
Minimum Acres
75-500
200+
10
7
Ability to Expand
Easy configuration for layout
200+
10
1
Limited Slope
<3% preferred
Exceeds 3%
6
1
Direct Road Access
Complete/In Place
Not In Place, Not
Direct
6
3
Shape
Rectangular
Somewhat Irregular
5
3
Encumbrances
Layout Impact
Drainage
8
1
Phase I Environmental
Completed
Completed
8
8
Environmental Issues
None
None Identified
8
8

Wetland
Delineated and Mitigated
Delineation Approved
10
2
Flood Plain (100 & 500 Year)
Mapped
Identified
10
10
Archeological
None
None Identified
8
8
Endangered Species
None
None Identified
8
8
Certified Site
Completed
No
5
3
Geotech Studies
No Unbuildable Areas
Available
8
8
Air Quality Attainment
Attainment Region
Attainment
6
6
Vibration Sources
Location Identified
None Identified
8
8
Water Protection Zone
No Chemical Use Restrictions
No
10
10
Compatible Adjacent Uses
No Sensitive Uses
Majority Agriculture
8
8
Direct Road Access Complete
In Place
No
6
3
Site Zoning
No Restrictions
Industrial Permitted
10
10
Height Limit
>60 ft.
None Identified
10
10
Adjacent Zoning
Protection from incompatible
uses
Zoning Update Being
Considered
6
4
Infrastructure
Timing
Constructed in Place
Planned, Not in Place
8
3
Electricity Minimum
SMW, Expand to 50 MW
Available
10
10
Green Mix of Power
% Green Sources
Available
5
5
Dual Electric Feeds
Available
Planned/Available
6
6
Dual Sub Stations
Available
Planned/Available
6
6
Quality (outage history)
Highest Quality
High Quality
8
8
Water
1 MGD, up to 4 MGD
Available
10
7

Water Cost
<$2,000 per 1000 gallons
$ 4.00 per 1,000
Gallons
4
2
Water Source
Preferred Impounded
Rivers and Reservoirs
4
4
Waste Water
0.75 MGD, double to 1.5 MGD
Available
10
7
Waste Water Cost
<2,000 per 1000 gallons
$ 5.00 per 1000
Gallons
4
2
WWT Plant Capacities
Size of Plant, MGD
Excess Capacity
8
8
Gravity Flow/Pump Station
Gravity From Site to Plant
Lift Station
2
1
Natural Gas
Available at Site
Available
10
10
Fiber
Available at Site
Available
10
10
Financials
Land Cost
Free
$20,000 Per Acre
5
2
System Development Charges
None
None
6
6
Off Site Cost/Fee
No Cost to Client
No Cost to Client
8
8
Sales Tax Construction Material
Abated
Abated
8
8
Sales Tax Mfg. Equipment
Abated
Abated
10
10
Accelerated Equipment Depreciation
Available
Certain Equipment
5
4
Incentives
Land
Free or Minimal Cost
$20,000 Per Acre
5
2
Infrastructure
No Cost to Client for Upgrades
No Cost
8
8
Site Pad Grading
Provided at Little or No Cost
None
5
2
Sales Tax Abatement
Construction Material
Equipment
Yes
10
10
Property Tax Abatement
5-10 Years
Partial
10
5
Training Grants
Initial and On -Going Program
Funding
Can Be Identified
4
4

A
N
W

APPENDIX M
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

PERSON COUNTY MEGASITE
' TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
September 20, 2017
PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY:
Timmons Group
5410 Trinity Rd, Suite 102
Raleigh, NC 27607
Person County Government Office -
Economic Development
304 S. Morgan Street
Roxboro, NC 27573
AfA 1-J6, PLIC
3240 Burnt Mill Drive
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]
Scott Cooke, PE — Project Manager
SCookel@.LJBinc.com
Study by: Laurence A. Sack, PE
Paul Goodhue, PE, PTOE and
Veena Madineni. PE PTOE
i CAy'�.,
C p
SEAT_
041851
FNCE A•S••'

PERSON COUNTY MEGASITE -TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • PERSON COUNTY, NC
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROJECTOVERVIEW...........................................................................................................................................1
EXISTING CONDITIONS........................................................................................................................................5
EXISTING AND BACKGROUND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS......................................................................................11
TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION..........................................................................................................14
BUILD CONDITION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS..........................................................................................................20
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS....................................................................................................33
t&i all a a fell] *V
FIGURE 1: PROJECT LOCATION MAP.............................................................................................3
FIGURE 2: STUDY AREA MAP..........................................................................................................4
FIGURE3: SITE PLAN.........................................................................................................................6
FIGURE 4: EXISTING GEOMETRY...................................................................................................
8
FIGURE 5: EXISTING YEAR (2017) TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES.................................10
FIGURE 6: BACKGROUND (2027) TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES...................................12
FIGURE 7: SITE TRIP DISTRIBUTION MAP..................................................................................16
FIGURE 8: PERCENT TRIP DISTRIBUTION BY INTERSECTION..............................................17
24
FIGURE 9: SITE TRIP VOLUMES - PHASE I.................................................................................18
24
FIGURE 10: SITE TRIP VOLUMES - FULL BUILD.......................................................................19
26
FIGURE 11: PHASE I (2027) BUILD - PEAK HOUR VOLUMES ..................................................
21
FIGURE 12: FULL BUILD (2027) PEAK HOUR VOLUMES..........................................................22
31
FIGURE 13: PHASE I GEOMETRY..................................................................................................
25
FIGURE 14: FULL BUILD GEOMETRY..........................................................................................
30
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1 - 3 -YEAR CRASH SUMMARY.......................................................................................... 7
TABLE 2: LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLDS FOR INTERSECTIONS....................................11
FIGURE 6: BACKGROUND (2027) TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES...................................12
TABLE 3: INTERSECTION LOS SUMMARY - EXISTING YEAR (2017) ...................................13
TABLE 4: INTERSECTION LOS SUMMARY - DESIGN YEAR (2027): BACKGROUND
CONDITION........................................................................................................................................13
TABLE 5: TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY...................................................................................14
TABLE 6: DESIGN YEAR (2027) PHASE I - LOS SUMMARY ......................................................
24
TABLE 7: DESIGN YEAR (2027) PHASE I WITH IMPROVEMENTS - LOS SUMMARY ........
24
TABLE 8: TURN LANE SIZING - PHASE I IMPROVEMENTS...................................................
26
TABLE 9: DESIGN YEAR (2027) BUILD -OUT - LOS SUMMARY ..............................................
27
TABLE 10: DESIGN YEAR (2027) BUILD -OUT WITH IMPROVEMENTS - LOS SUMMARY
31
TABLE 11: TURN LANE SIZING - FULL BUILD SCNEARIO IMPROVEMENTS ....................
32
TABLE OF CONTENTS @ f f ! !

PERSON COUNTY MEGASITE -TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • PERSON COUNTY, NC
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A - PROJECT DOCUMENTATION
APPENDIX B - TRAFFIC COUNT DATA
APPENDIX C - SYNCHRO - EXISTING AND BACKGROUND ANALYSIS REPORTS
APPENDIX D - TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION
APPENDIX E - SYNCHRO - BUILD ANALYSIS REPORTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS @ ( 1 J 1

PERSON COUNTY MEGASITE -TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • PERSON COUNTY, NC
PROJECT OVERVIEW
INTRODUCTION
This report documents the findings of a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared to evaluate the
transportation impact of an industrial use mega site in Person County, North Carolina. The purpose of
this study is to evaluate future traffic operations of the site accesses, adjacent intersections and
roadways to determine impacts associated with the new development and identify roadway
improvements to maintain acceptable levels of service.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The proposed development is anticipated to accommodate a six (6) million square foot (SF) plus
semi -conductor facility along with ancillary, supporting land uses. While an end user is yet to be
determined, Person County is hoping to attract a semi -conductor facility for this site. A preliminary
site plan has been developed for the proposed site and the development is anticipated to occur in
multiple phases over several years. The initial phase (Phase I) is anticipated to be 2.35 million SF and
Phase II is anticipated to be 3.175 million SF resulting in a ten year build (Phase I & II) of 5.525
million SF. This study evaluates the development over the next 10 years only; two build phases will
be considered for analysis.
The site is located on either side (north and south) of Edwin Robertson Road near Country Club Road
between Oak Grove Road and Woodsdale Road. As part of the development, a portion of Country
Club Road will be vacated and connection to Edwin Robertson Road will be rerouted through the site.
A project location map is shown on Figure 1 and a site plan included in Appendix A.
STUDY AREA
The following intersections are included in the project study area, as shown in Figure 2.
> Edwin Robertson Road (SR 1322)/ McGhees Mill Road (SR 1336/SR 1337)
> Edwin Robertson Road (SR 1322)/ Oak Grove Road (SR 1334)
> Edwin Robertson Road (SR 1322)/ Country Club Road(SR 1333)
> Edwin Robertson Road (SR 1322)/ Shiloh Church Road/ Woodsdale Road (SR 1326)
> Shiloh Church Road (SR 1322)/ US 501 (Boston Road)
> Country Club Road (SR 1333)/ Chub Lake Road (SR 1337)
Along with the above existing intersections, the following site access points at Edwin Robertson
Road will be evaluated.
> Edwin Robertson Road (SR 1322)/ Site Driveway #1 (East driveway)
> Edwin Robertson Road (SR 1322)/ Site Driveway #2 (West driveway)
STUDY METHODOLOGY
The framework for this study is based on guidelines established in the North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) TIA Checklist including the NCDOT Congestion Management Capacity
Analysis Guidelines. Traffic generated by the proposed site will be estimated using the Institute of
Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 91h edition.
EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 @ f f J f J

PERSON COUNTY MEGASITE -TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • PERSON COUNTY. NC
ANALYSIS SCENARIOS
The proposed site will be developed over several years; however, for the purpose of this study, Phase
I is anticipated to be completed within 2 years and Phase II within 10 years. A 2027 design year has
been selected for this study to represent a 10 year build horizon from the current year 2017. Traffic
analyses for both Phase I and Full Build (Phase I & II combined) will be completed for design
year 2027 only, instead of an opening year and design year scenario.
Detailed traffic analyses have been prepared for all study intersections for the following scenarios to
assess impacts of the development.
> Existing Year 2017
> Future Year 2027 No Build (background traffic only)
> Future Year 2027 Phase I Build (background plus site generated traffic from Phase I)
> Future Year 2027 Full Build (Phase I Build traffic plus traffic from Phase II )
> Future Year 2027 Full Build with infrastructure improvements
EXISTING CONDITIONS 2 @ �� I J 1

PERSON COUNTY MEGASITE -TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • PERSON COUNTY. NC
FIGURE 1: PROJECT LOCATION MAP
EXISTING CONDITIONS 3

r
�I -awe�
� s ten(
- _� � SR 1322 � •
00
alwn
• �� r aoo0
N
• / ,r
:11'i 4 z
1Ir
L
"+ R
,• .� _� X31 i - � `
Proposed Site
St'Site Access drives
z a "►11
y Intersections
\ r

PERSON COUNTY MEGASITE -TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • PERSON COUNTY, NC
EXISTING CONDITIONS
STUDY METHODOLOGY
The framework for this study is based on guidelines established in the North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) TIA Checklist including the NCDOT Congestion Management Capacity
Analysis Guidelines. Traffic generated by the proposed site will be estimated using the Institute of
Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9`h edition.
EXISTING CONDITION INFORMATION
The proposed development will be located along Edwin Robertson Road near Country Club Road in
Person County, NC. A preliminary site plan is shown in Figure 3.
EXISTING ROADWAYS
Existing roadways expected to be significantly impacted by the proposed site are discussed below. A
roadway ADT map for all study roadways is included in Appendix D:
US 501/Boston Road: US 501/Boston Road is a 2 -lane undivided roadway with a posted speed limit
of 55 miles per hour (mph). US 501, a north -south highway is the primary connector in the project
vicinity connecting to interstates and other major highways. US 501 also provides access to the state of
Virginia to the north. The average daily traffic (ADT) for 2015 ranged between 4,100 and 4,800
vehicles per day (vpd) on US 501 from south of Shiloh Church Road to the Virginia state line.
The Person County Comprehensive Transportation Plan has identified widening of US 501 from a
two/three-lane section to a four -lane section from Roxboro to Virginia state line. However,
construction funding is only available for a portion of this widening. Construction funds are not
available for the improvements from Halifax Road, 3 miles south of Shiloh Church Road, to the
Virginia state line. US 501 is a 4 -lane divided roadway in the state of Virginia.
SR 1322/Edwin Robertson Road: Edwin Robertson Road is a two-lane undivided roadway with a
posted speed limit of 55 mph. Edwin Robertson Road carries low volume traffic in current conditions
(less than 1000 vpd) and will provide access to the proposed site along with Country Club Road.
SR 1322/Shiloh Church Road: Shiloh Church Road is a two-lane undivided roadway with a posted
speed limit of 45 mph. The 2015 ADT on Shiloh Church Road is 630 vpd.
SR 1326 /Woodsdale Road: SR 1326/Woodsdale Road is a two-lane undivided roadway with a
posted speed limit of 45 mph within study limits. The 2015 ADT on Woodsdale Road, south of Shiloh
Church Road is 480 vpd.
SR 1333/Country Club Road: Country Club Road is a two-lane undivided roadway with a posted
speed limit of 55 mph south of Edwin Robertson Road. A reduced speed limit of 45 mph is posted
surrounding Roxboro Country Club and south. . The 2014 ADT on Country Club Road is 1900 vpd.
Country Club Road provides access to the site and a portion of Country Club Road near Edwin
Robertson Road is expected to be vacated with this new development. Internal site access roadways
will be constructed to connect to Edwin Robertson Road.
EXISTING CONDITIONS

Zapata-LJB, PLLC Person County Mega Site TIA N Figure 3
3240 Burnt Mill Drive
V y► Wilmington, NC 28403 Site Plan Page 6

PERSON COUNTY MEGASITE -TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • PERSON COUNTY. NC
SR 1337/Chub Lake Road: Chub Lake Road is a two-lane undivided roadway with a posted speed
limit of 45 mph. The 2015 ADT on Chub Lake Road, south of Country Club Road, is 2500 vpd.
Chub Lake Road is another north -south street in the study area that will provide access to the site from
the city of Roxboro area.
SR 1334/Oak Grove Road: Oak Grove Road is a two-lane undivided roadway with a posted speed
limit of 55 mph. The 2015 ADT on Oak Grove Road is 370 vpd.
SR 1336/SR 1337/McGhees Mill Road: McGhees Mill Road is a two-lane undivided roadway with a
posted speed limit of 55 mph. The 2015 ADT on McGhees Mill Road is 650 vpd.
STUDY INTERSECTIONS
The following six intersections will be analyzed for impacts due to the proposed development. Along
with the existing intersections, two future site access points on Edwin Robertson Road will be
analyzed under design year Phase I & Full build conditions.
> Edwin Robertson Rd / McGhees Mill Rd >
> Edwin Robertson Rd / Oak Grove Rd >
> Edwin Robertson Rd / Country Club Rd
> Edwin Robertson Rd / Shiloh Church Rd/
Woodsdale Rd
Shiloh Church Rd / US -501 (Boston Rd)
Country Club Rd / Chub Lake Rd
Future site access
• Edwin Robertson Rd / Site Driveway
#I (East driveway)
Edwin Robertson Rd / Site Driveway
#2 (West driveway)
All existing intersections are un -signalized, two-way stop control intersections. A dedicated left turn
lane is available on the northbound approach at the intersection of US 501/Boston Road at Shiloh
Church Road. Dedicated turn lanes are not provided at all other intersections, where turning
movements are completed via through lanes at these locations. Figure 4 graphically presents the
intersection geometry and traffic control.
CRASH REVIEW
The crash history for a 3 -year period from January 01, 2014 through December 31, 2016 was reviewed
for Edwin Robertson Rd and Shiloh Church Road including the six (6) study intersections. Table 1
summarizes crash patterns and severity of crashes recorded within the study period. Animal crashes
have been removed from the summaries.
TABLE 1 — 3 -YEAR CRASH SUMMARY
Location
Edwin Robertson Rd @ Mcaees Mill Rd
Total
Crashes
(2014-2016) Crash Types
5 Fixed Object -4
Severity
Property damage only - 4 crashes
Rear -end -1
minor injuries - I crash
Edwin Robertson Rd @ Oak Grove Rd
0
NA
NA
Edwin Robertson Rd @ Country Club Rd
l
Overturn
No visible injury
Edwin Robertson/Shiloh Church C Woodsdale Rd
1 3
Angle -3
Minor injuries
Shiloh Church Rd @ US 501
5
Fixed Object4
All injury crashes with 2 crashes
Left tum - l
resulting in disabling injury level
Chub Lake Road @ Country Club Rd
0
NA
NA
Edwin Robertson/Shiloh Church -
Fixed Object -7
Fatal - l (head-on), minor injury -1,
MCChees Mill Rd to US 501
9
Head-on - 1
No visible injury - 2, Property
Overtum-1
Dama e Only - 5
EXISTING CONDITIONS 7 @ ( 1 ! I

]P[LD
MR
,500
55 �
,� � Fy
I
�LiijRo
1326
,anc
C7 iC5'
379
{ ��D
A
�,C��y, LIMIT SPED sO•'�
55 55
0
a
p
I -T
45rGro�or�Mo
a ~spao
--►
Sr��O 45
1
� F
xe
LIMIT1
55�SorR �' �
f
(300')
MIT
LIMY
0
�
51M�rt 1
IJ
G t32b
U
1332
v
—Po. Existing Lane Configuration `6la YM
�P1Dy
J6 Stop Control Approach s ,EES
45
45
t
Y
Proposed Site [
r1
300' Storage Length (Turn lanes)
Zapata-LJB, PLLC
3240 Burnt Mill Drive
Person County Mega Site TIA
Figure 4
Wilmington, NC 28403
Existing Geometry
Page 8

PERSON COUNTY MEGASITE -TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • PERSON COUNTY, NC
DATA COLLECTION
Turning movement counts were conducted at the six (6) study intersections for AM and PM peak
periods. The counts were collected on Wednesday, March 22, 2017 from 7:00 am to 9:00 am and 4:00
pm to 6:00 pm at the six (6) intersections.
Edwin Robertson Road / McGhees Mill Road
Edwin Robertson Road / Oak Grove Road
Edwin Robertson Road / Country Club Road
> Edwin Robertson Road / Shiloh Church Road / Woodsdale Road
> Shiloh Church Road / US -501 (Boston Road)
> Country Club Road / Chub Lake Road
The AM peak hour was identified from 7:15 to 8:15 AM. The PM peak hour was identified from 4:30
to 5:30 PM. Traffic data is included in Appendix B. The existing year (2017) turning movement
volumes are shown in Figure 5.
EXISTING CONDITIONS 9 @ (S
1 J

a
o
0
o
3
N
Y.
0
RT 0
16 21
RT 11 TH 27
TH 19
6
13 1
TH 31
Shiloh
23 233
TH LT
LT 14 LT 3 Edward Robertson
LT 17
RT
TH LT
LT 2
church Rd
RT TH
TH RT 24 TH LT RT
11 TH LT RT
3 LT
LT RT
TH
31 LT
LT TH
15 6 4 RT 1 7
20 RT 13 21
28 TH
5
13 0
3 RT
6 243
c
1 RT
�
O
�
a
V
C
O
O
U
2 96 RT 57
Chub RT LT TH 14
AM Peak
Lake Rd 2 LT
68 TH
f
�
o
o
3
N
�
o
tg
RT 0
16 13
RT 45 TH 54
TH 25
5
9 2
TH 28
Shiloh
18 203
TH LT
LT 14 LT 8 Edward Robertson
LT 13
RT
TH LT
LT 1
church Rd
RT TH
TH RT 26 TH LT RT
16 TH LT RT
6 LT
LT RT
TH
9 LT
LT TH
22 13 1 RT 1 2
12 RT 43 10
15 TH
5
24 1
7 RT
8 200
8 RT
�
t?
a
a
s
2 RT 141
Chub RT LT TH 36
PM Peak
Lake Rd 0 LT
35 TH
Zapata-LJB, PLLC
Person County Mega Site TIA
Figure 5
r,,
t 3240 Burnt Mill Drive
♦✓ JJJJrrrr Wilmington, NC 28403
Existing (2017) Peak Hour Volumes
Page 10

PERSON COUNTY MEGASITE -TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • PERSON COUNTY, NC
EXISTING AND BACKGROUND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
TRAFFIC VOLUMES FOR ANALYSES
Existing Condition
The existing year (2017) turning movement volumes as shown on Figure 5 will be utilized for
existing year capacity analysis. The observed peak hour factors from the traffic counts will be applied
for each intersection. The existing intersection geometry and traffic control as shown on Figure 4 will
be the basis for capacity analysis.
Background Condition
Trips from other approved developments planned to be built must be accounted in the background
conditions for future year analysis. Currently, no approved developments are identified in the study
area.
While no new developments are anticipated, background traffic is anticipated to grow on an annual
basis. An annual growth rate of 0.5 percent (exponential growth) was used to estimate design year
(2027) background volumes. This growth rate was discussed with Person County Economic
Development and is suggested as an acceptable rate for this area. The design year (2027) background
volumes are shown in Figure 6.
The NCDOT STIP projects through the year 2025 were reviewed and no projects are listed for study
roadways or intersections. The existing intersection geometry and traffic control as shown on Figure
4 will be the basis for background condition (2027) capacity analysis.
CAPACITY ANALYSES
Intersections are graded using a level of service (LOS) designation expressed in terms of letter grades.
Level of service is a quality measure describing operational conditions of a traffic stream with LOS A
representing the highest quality traffic flow and minimal delay, and LOS F representing poor traffic
operations, significant delay, and substantial queuing. Level of service is defined in terms of vehicle
delay, as published in the Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, 2010).
Levels of service thresholds based on delay per vehicle are summarized for signalized and un -
signalized intersections in Table 2.
TABLE 2: LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLDS FOR INTERSECTIONS
LEVEL OF
A
< 10
< 10
B
> 10 and:5 20
> 10 and <_ 15
C
>20and<35
>15and<_25
D
>35and<_55
>25and<35
E
>55and<_80
>35and<_50
F
> 80
> 50
Intersection capacity was evaluated at all study intersections with the assistance of Synchro software
version 9 for existing (2017) and background (2027) conditions. Traffic volumes from Figure 5 were
utilized for existing (2017) analysis and traffic volumes from Figure 6 were utilized for the
background (2027) analysis. Intersection geometry as shown on Figure 4 was the basis for analysis
for both scenarios.
EXISTING AND BACKGROUND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 11 {

a
s
RT
0
17 23
RT 12 TH 29 Edward
TH 20 TH 20
7 14 2
TH
33
SWIM
25 245
TH LT
LT 15 LT 4 Robertson
LT 1 LT 18
RT TH LT
LT
3
church Rd
RT TH
TH RT 26 TH LT RT
12 TH LT RT 12 TH LT RT
4 LT
LT
RT
TH
33 LT LT TH
16 7 5 RT 2 8
22 RT 14 1 1 RT 1 23
30 TH
6
14
0
4 RT 7 256
2 RT
a
z
o
3 101 RT 60
Chub RT LT TH 15
AM Peak
Lake Rd 3 LT
72 TH
1.05
I
�
3
�
RT
0
17 14 RT 48 TH 57 Edward
TH 27 TH 27
6 10 3
TH
30
Shiloh
19 214
TH LT LT 15 LT 9 Robertson
LT 1 LT 14
RT TH LT
LT
2
church Rd
RT TH
TH RT 28 TH LT RT
17 TH LT RT 17 TH LT RT
7 LT
LT
RT
TH
10 LT LT TH
24 14 2 RT 2 3
13 RT 46 1 1 RT 1 11
16 TH
6
26
2
8 RT 9 211
9 RT
i
a
G
L
u
3 81 RT 149
PM Peak
Chub RT LT TH 38
Lake Rd 0 LT
0.5% per year compound growth
37 TH
Zapata-LJB, PLLC
Person County Mega Site TIA
Figure 6
3240 Burnt Mill Drive
N
V �r —Wilmington, NC 28403
Background (2027) Peak Hour Volumes
Pae 12

PERSON COUNTY MEGASITE -TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • PERSON COUNTY, NC
Capacity analysis results are summarized in Table 3 for existing year (2017) conditions and in Table
4 for design year (2027) background conditions. As shown in Tables 3 and 4, all study intersections
operate at LOS `C' or better under the existing and design year background conditions. Detailed
output reports from Synchro are provided in Appendix C.
TABLE 3: INTERSECTION LOS SUMMARY
- EXISTING YEAR 2017
ApproachIntersection
A/9.2 A/8.9
Edwin Robertson Rd @ McGhees Mill Rd
WB approach
A/9.1
A/8.9
SBL A/7.3
A/7.3
Edwin Robertson Rd @ Oak Grove Rd
WB Left
A/7.3
A/7.3
NEB approach A/8.6
A/8.7
Edwin Robertson Rd @ Country Club Rd
WB Left
A/7.4
A/7.4
NEB approach A/8.8
A/9.1
Edwin Robertson/Shiloh Church
@ Woodsdale Rd
EB approach
A/9.6
A/9.2
WB approach A/9.8
A/9.6
NBL A/7.3
A/7.3
SBL A/7.3
A/7.3
Shiloh Church Rd @ US 501
EB approach
C/15.2
13/11.5
NBL A/8.0
A/7.8
Chub Lake Road @ Country Club Rd
EB Left
A/7.4
A/0.1
SB approach B/10.1
A/9.6
Legend: A/1.0 - LOS letter rade/delav in seconds
ner vehicle
B/ 10.1
A/9.8
All study intersections are controlled by two-way stop signs
TABLE 4: INTERSECTION LOS SUMMARY - DESIGN YEAR 2027: BACKGROUND CONDITION
Edwin Robertson Rd @ McGhees Mill Rd
ApproachIntersection
WB approach
A/9.2 A/8.9
SBL
A/7.3
A/7.3
Edwin Robertson Rd @ Oak Grove Rd
WB Left
A/7.3
A/7.3
NEB approach
A/8.7
A/8.7
Edwin Robertson Rd @ Country Club Rd
WB Left
A/7.4
A/7.4
NEB approach
A/8.8
A/9.2
Edwin Robertson/Shiloh Church
@ Woodsdale Rd
EB approach
A/9.7
A/9.3
WB approach
A/9.9
A/9.7
NBL
A/7.3
A/7.3
SBL
A/7.3
A/7.3
Shiloh Church Rd @ US 501
EB approach
C/15.9
B/11.7
NBL
A/8.0
A/7.8
Chub Lake Road @ Country Club Rd
EB Left
A/7.4
A/0.1
SB approach
B/ 10.1
A/9.8
Legend: A/1.0 - LOS letter grade/delay in seconds per vehicle
All study intersections are controlled by two-way stop signs, Existing (2017) geometry utilized
EXISTING AND BACKGROUND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 13 @ f j

PERSON COUNTY MEGASITE -TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • PERSON COUNTY, NC
TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION
SITE TRIP GENERATION (ITE METHODOLOGY)
Site generated trip ends for the Person County Mega Site were estimated based on the anticipated land
use. While an end user is not identified at this time, it is anticipated that the development will be a
semi -conductor facility that includes a combination of research facility, fabrication/manufacturing,
ware -housing and general office space. Site trips were forecast using data and methodology contained
in the Institute of Transportation Engineers -(ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9`h Edition. The following
land use codes were used to estimate site traffic for Phase I and Phase II.
Code 130 (Industrial Park)
Code 710 (General Office Building) - Phase I
> Code 750 (Office Park) - Phase II
The ITE land use code (LUC) 130 defined Industrial Park as a mix of manufacturing, service and
warehousing and is considered appropriate for the nature of this development. The ITE LUC 710
(General office building) is applicable for small office space and is considered appropriate for Phase I,
where an office building of 150,000 SF will be included with the central industrial facility. LUC 750
represents a large scale office space/park; where multiple buildings are spread around a campus. With
the completion of Phase II as shown on Figure 3, multiple buildings will be established on the project
site, so a LUC 750 is considered appropriate for this phase.
The initial phase (Phase 1) is anticipated to be 2.35 million SF that includes 2.2 million SF industrial
facility and 150, 000 SF office space. Phase II is anticipated to be 3.175 million SF with 2.22 million
SF industrial land use and 955,000 SF office space. Trip generation results for Phase 1, II and a
combined Full build are summarized in Table 5 with detailed calculations included in Appendix D.
TABLE 5:
TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY
ITE Land Use
Daily AM Peak PM Peak
Phase
Size
Category/Code
In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total
Industrial Park
2,200 KSF
5,828
5,828
11,656
891
195
1,086
367
1,379
1,746
(ITE Code: 130 )
Phase I
Gen Office Building
150 KSF
894
894
1,788
233
32
265
42
204
246
(ITE Code: 710 )
Subtotal for Phase 1
6,722
1 6,722
13,444
1,124
1 227
1,351
1 409
1,583
1 1,992
Industrial Park
2,220 KSF
5,878
5,878
11,756
897
197
1,094
370
1,392
1,762
(ITECode: 130 )
Phase Q
Office Park
955 KSF
5180
5180
10360
1275
158
1433
177
1084
1261
(TTE Code: 750 )
Subtotal for Phase HI
11,058
1 11,058
22,116
1 2,172
1 355 1
2,527 1
547 1
2,476 1
3,023
Combined Total
17,780
17,780
35,560
3,296
582
3,878
956 1
4,059 1
5,015
As shown in Table 5, Phase I development is estimated to generate 13,444 daily trips including 1,351
trips during the AM peak and 1,992 trips in the PM peak. Phase II development is estimated to
generate 22,116 daily trips including 2,527 trips during the AM peak and 3,023 trips during the PM
peak hour. The full build (combined Phase I & II) are estimated to generate 35,560 daily trips
including 3,878 trips during the AM peak hour and 5,015 trips during the PM peak hour.
TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION 14 @ ( 1 1

PERSON COUNTY MEGASITE - TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • PERSON COUNTY. NC
All trips generated by the site are assumed to be primary trips, i.e., pass -by trips are not assumed. A
reduction in net trips due to internal capture is also not considered for this study.
VEHICLE TRIP DISTRIBUTION
Trip distribution is the process of determining the directional flow of traffic associated with a new
development. Traffic generated by the development will be distributed to the surrounding roadway
network via the proposed access driveways.
The traffic volume data for each of the study roadway segments was used as the basis for distributing
site trips to the network. Along with roadway volumes, site trip distribution accounted for the
proximity of the proposed site to urban areas and available connectivity to Interstate and highway
systems in the area.
Person County does not include any interstate systems, with the nearest Interstate facilities being I-85
(40 miles to the east) and 1-40 (45 miles to the south). Connectivity to these Interstate facilities and the
state of Virginia highway system to the north is anticipated to be provided via US 501/Boston Road. A
majority of trucks to/from the proposed site will utilize area highways and Interstate facilities to
transport raw material and finished products. While the truck traffic is heavy for industrial parks in
general, the percentage of trucks during the AM and PM peak hours is typically modest. A truck
percentage of 5% will be assumed for the proposed site. Global trip distribution to the adjacent
roadway network is shown in Figure 7. Appendix D includes the roadway volume data.
Phase I includes development at the central facility, south of Edwin Robertson Road, whereas Phase II
includes development on both north and south sides of Edwin Robertson Road. Under the full build
scenario, the percent distribution to the north and south sides of development are proportionate to the
size of development, where approximately 70 percent of the development will be on the south side and
the remaining 30 percent on the north side. Figure 8 shows the distribution percentages by phase at
each intersection.
These distribution percentages were applied to the AM and PM peak hour trips generated by phase to
estimate the projected site trips at each intersection. Figures 9 and 10 show the site trip volumes for
Phase I and Full build scenarios, respectively.
11
TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION 15 C11)

�t'
N
}! Fak
1328
O\p
N i�
0
0
sof
8% 'm
62%
0 0. ria
o� R Grvtc
ea
10%
` `EaLOP
`
o
M
1331
1}26
c a
1332
4
5% % Distribution
chGb
`d*PR
Y
a
Site INE -
Proposed +�
X326
T
O
cv --
,34z
Go gle
i Zapata-LJB, PLLC
3240 Burnt Mill Drive
Person County Mega Site TIA
N
Figure 7
Wilmington, NC 28403
Site Trip Distribution Map
Pae 16

f
�
3
�
RT
5%
RT TH Edward
TH TH
4%
TH 620
Shiloh
28°x6
TH LT
LT LT Robert— LT LT 68%
RT TH LT
LT
church Rd
RT TH
TH RT 8% TH LT RT
6% TH LT RT TH LT RT
LT LT RT
TH
LT LT TH
3% RT 2%
4% RT 4% SITE 6% RT 6%, 68%
TH 2%
RT �4%
d d
a a
0
RT
rc
O
jS c
V
r
aV
2% 20% RT 20%
Chub RT LT TH
Phase 1
Lake Rd 2% LT
TH
E
�
oo
o
a"
3
m°
H RT 20%
RT
5%
RT TH Edward
5% 20/ TH i TH 35%,
4%
TH 62%
Shiloh
TH LT
LT LT Robertson RT TH LT LT 15% LT 33%
RT TH
LT
LT
church Rd
RT TH
TH RT 8/ TH LT RT
5% LT LT TH RT 350/% TH LT RT
LT LT RT
TH
LT LT TH
3% RT 2%
1% TH 4% 5% 15% SITE 1% RT 1% 33%
TH 2%
RT 341'%
4% RTJ d
a
RT
¢
Full Build
a JS
z
o
Entering 1109
2% 200/, RT 20%
Exiting
chub RT LT TH
Lake Rd 2% LT
TH
�, Zapata-LJB, PLLC
3240 Burnt Mill Drive
Person County Mega Site TIA
Figure 8
� Wilmington, NC 28403
Percent Trip Distribution by Intersection
Pae 17

Zapata-LJB, PLLC
3240 Burnt Mill Drive
VV Jr Wilmington, NC 28403
Person County Mega Site TIA
Site Trip Volumes — Phase I
Figure 9
Page 18
AM Peak
�
3
�
$
RT
56
RT
TH
Edward
TH
.
TH
45
TH 697 Shiloh
? 15
TH LT
LT
LT
Robertson
11:67
LT
764
RT TH LT
LT Church Rd
RT TH
TH
RT 90 TH
LT
RT
67 T
TH
LTRT9
LT
LT RT TH
LT
LT TH
34 RT
22
45 R
ELTRT
RT
14
154
W TH
22
RT
u2
a
RT
i7
q
a
10
i
5 45u
RT 225
EileP12
Chub
RT LT
TH
Lake Rd
22 LT
Exiting
TH
PM Peak
v
RT
20
RT
TH
71 Edward
TH
16
TH 2.54 Shiloh
a 5TH
LT
LT
LT
3' Robertson
dTHY,
JIV25
LT 278
RT TH LT
LT Church Rd
RT TH
TH
RT 33 TH
LT
RT
25 T
LT RT
63 LT
LT RT TH
44.3 LT
LT TH
12 RT
8
16 R
95 1076
981 TH
8
538 RT
139
b
G
d
a
v
a
32 RT
o'
UK
a
a
u
t
c
u
32 317 RT 82
Site Traffic
Chub
RT LT TH
In 409
Entering 10
Lake Rd
8 LT
Out 1 1583
Exiting I
TH
Zapata-LJB, PLLC
3240 Burnt Mill Drive
VV Jr Wilmington, NC 28403
Person County Mega Site TIA
Site Trip Volumes — Phase I
Figure 9
Page 18

AM Peak
t�
i
165 RT 24
TH LT LT 1 -
RT 264 TH
99 RT
Lap. Rd 66 LT
TH
a
PM Peak
a
d
RT
659
RT
TH 1/ Edward
29 29 116
TH
6
TH
1154
132
TH 2044 Shiloh
923
LT 12 Robercson
RT TH LT
LT
494
LT
1088
RT TH LT
LT Church Rd
RT TH
LT RT
165 LT
LT
TH
RT 204 TH
LT
RT
2 L
LT RT TH
161 LT
LT TH
66
33 TH
23
165
87 SITE 33 RT
6
192
361 TH
66
198 RT
1121
TH LT
132 R
LT 91 Robertson
RT TH LT LT 143
LT
a
RT TH LT
12 RT
RT TH
TH RT 76 TH
LT RT
48 LT LT TH RT
142 _ TH LT
RT
-162 LT
LT RT TH
LT
LT TH
29 RT
19
10 TH 162 48 609
10 RT 41
1339
317 TH
19
t
325
38 RT
n
81 RT
a
3
a
12 116
RT 659
Lap. Rd 66 LT
TH
7
� U
� C
O
U
Site TrC 81 812 RT 191
In 956 Entering 110 1 Chub RT LT TH
Out 4059 Exiting 0 Lake Rd 19 LT
TH
PLLC Person County Mega Site TIA Figure 10
3240
J 3240 Burnt
Mill Drive
Wilmington, NC 28403 Site Trip Volumes Full Build Page 19
PM Peak
a
d
Ur
O
N
G
RT 191
RT
48
RT 203
TH ;25 Edward
203 203 812 TH 41
TH
335
38
TH 593 shuoh
268
TH LT
LT 122
LT 91 Robertson
RT TH LT LT 143
LT
315
RT TH LT
LT Church Rd
RT TH
TH RT 76 TH
LT RT
48 LT LT TH RT
142 _ TH LT
RT
-162 LT
LT RT TH
LT
LT TH
29 RT
19
10 TH 162 48 609
10 RT 41
1339
317 TH
19
RT
325
38 RT
n
81 RT
a
3
a
7
� U
� C
O
U
Site TrC 81 812 RT 191
In 956 Entering 110 1 Chub RT LT TH
Out 4059 Exiting 0 Lake Rd 19 LT
TH
PLLC Person County Mega Site TIA Figure 10
3240
J 3240 Burnt
Mill Drive
Wilmington, NC 28403 Site Trip Volumes Full Build Page 19

PERSON COUNTY MEGASITE -TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • PERSON COUNTY, NC
BUILD CONDITION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
This study evaluates the operational impacts due to the proposed development in the next 10 years
through 2027. The proposed site is anticipated to be developed in two phases, Phase I in the next 2
years and Phase II through the year 2027. However, the analysis is only completed for the design year
2027 instead of interim years for both Phase i and full build (Phase I & II combined).
BUILD VOLUMES
The build condition volumes for Phase I are estimated by adding the site volumes (Figure 9) to the
2027 background volumes from Figure 6, the resulting Phase I volumes for AM and PM peak hours
are shown on Figure 11.
The build condition volumes for Full build are estimated by adding the site volumes (Figure 10) to the
background volumes from Figure 6. Figure 12 provides the resulting AM and PM peak hour volumes
for Full build condition.
BUILD CONDITION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 20 @ (S
l /

0
o
o
v
is
RT 0
17 79
RT 23 TH 47 Edward TH 34 TH 20 52 14 2
TH 730 Shiloh 340 245
TH LT
LT 22 LT 9 Robertson LT 1 LT 782 RT TH LT
LT 3 Church Rd RT TH
TH RT 116 TH LT RT 79 TH LT RT 12 TH LT RT 13 LT LT RT TH 97 LT LT TH
16 41 5 RT 2 30 67 RT 23 1 SITE 68 RT 15 177 171 TH 28 14 0 81 RT 389 256
7 RT
a � a
o �
V
'o
O
8 146 RT 285
AM Peak Chub RT LT ITH 15
Lake Rd 25 LT
72 TH
E
T
s
E
°
u
RT 0
17 34
RT 127 TH 184 Edward TH 122 TH 27 22 10 3
TH 284 shah 134 214
TH LT
ILT 62 LT 41 Robertson LT 1 LT 292 RT TH LT
LT 2 Church Rd RT TH
TH RT 61 TH LT RT 42 TH LT RT 17 TH LT RT 70 LT LT RT TH 453 LT LT TH
24 26 2 RT 2 11 29 RT 109 1 $I 26 RT 96 1087 997 TH 6 26 2 546 RT 148 211
d d 9 RT
a a
a a
t
u
0"
35 398 RT 231
PM Peak Chub RT LT ITH 38
Lake Rd 8 LT
37 TH
Zapata-LJB, PLLC
fj 3240 Burnt Mill Drive
Person County Mega Site TIA
N
Figure 11
Pae 21
Wilmington, NC 28403
Phase I (2027) Build Peak Hour Volumes

a
f
N
s
3
�
RT 659
RT 0
17 188
RT 41 TH 76 Edward 29 29 116
TH 26 TH 1174 139 14 2
TH 2077 Shiloh 948 245
TH LT
LT 32 LT 16 Robert— RT TH LT
LT 495 LT 1106 RT TH LT
LT 3 Church Rd RT TH
TH RT 290 TH LT RT 165 TH RT 216 TH LT RT 27 LT LT RT TH 196 LT LT TH
]LTLT
16 106 5 RT 2 74 45 37 16588 SITE 34 RT 7 215 391 TH 72 14 0 202 RT 1128 256
154 d 14 RT
a
� o
a
r
0
15 217 RT 719
AM Peak Chub RT LT TH 15
Lake Rd 69 LT
72 TH
E
RT 191
RT 0
17 62
RT 251 TH 382 Edward 203 203 812
TH 68 TH 362 44 10 3
TH 623 Shiloh 287 214
TH LT
LT 137 LT 90 Robert— RT TH LT
LT 144 LT 329 RT TH LT
LT 2 Church Rd RT TH
TH RT 104 TH LT RT 48 TH RT 1438 TH LT RT 169 LT LT RT TH 1147 LT LT TH
TLTLT
24 43 2 RT 2 22 27 848 610 SITE 11 RT 42 1350 2533 TH 25 26 2 1388 RT Pd 21151
90 RT
a
� - a
i'
u
0
84 893 RT 340
PM Peak Chub RT LT ITH 38
Lake Rd 19 LT
37 TH
Zapata-LJB, PLLC
@ { j t 3240 Burnt Mill Drivelk-
Person County Mega Site TIA
Figure 12
Pae 22
Wilmington, NC 28403
Full Build (2027) Build - Peak Hour Volumes

PERSON COUNTY MEGASITE -TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • PERSON COUNTY, NC
PHASE I ANALYSIS
Background Geometric Improvements
For 2027 Phase I, the following geometric improvements are anticipated to be in place.
> Public access to Country Club Road will be closed at Edwin Robertson Road. Two (2) site
access points will be in place as shown on the site plan (Figure 3).
> The circular roadway serving the development is anticipated to be a 4 -lane facility south of
Edwin Robertson Road as it connects to the main campus parking.
Capacity Analysis
Capacity analysis was completed for Phase I using traffic volumes from Figure 11 and existing
geometry (2017) plus above listed improvements. Table 6 summarizes the intersection LOS and delay
for 2027 Phase I by intersection. As shown in Table 6, three (3) study intersections are anticipated to
operate at a failing level of service, E or F. Additional geometric improvements are necessary to
improve the operating conditions and achieve an acceptable level of service. Recommended
improvements are listed below and also shown graphically on Figure 13:
> Edwin Robertson Rd @ Site Access 1 (east access)
• Install a dedicated left turn lane (850 feet) in the westbound direction
• Install an auxiliary lane in the eastbound direction for a reasonable length (+/-2000 feet) to
accommodate the free flow merge of northbound right turning vehicles.
• Install a traffic signal
• Channelize eastbound and northbound right turn lanes. These lanes will not be controlled
by the traffic signal and traffic will be free flow as they have dedicated receiving lanes.
> Edwin Robertson/Shiloh Church Rd @ Woodsdale Road
• Install left turn lanes on the eastbound (700 feet) and westbound (350 feet) approaches.
• Install a traffic signal
> Shiloh Church Rd @ US 501
• Install a dedicated left turn lane (675 feet) on the eastbound approach and a dedicated right
turn lane (775 feet) on the southbound approach.
• Lengthen left turn lane on northbound approach from the existing 300 feet to 900 feet.
• Install a traffic signal
Table 7 summarizes the resulting intersection delay and LOS. With the above improvements in place,
the study intersections are projected to operate at an acceptable LOS `C' or better under 2027 Phase I
build conditions. Detailed Synchro reports are included in Appendix E.
BUILD CONDITION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 23 @ 1 1

PERSON COUNTY MEGASITE -TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • PERSON COUNTY, NC
TABLE 6: DESIGN YEAR 2027 PHASE I - LOS
Intersection
Edwin Robertson Rd @ McGhees Mill Rd
SUMMARY
Approach
WB approach A/9.5 A/9.8
SBL
A/7.5
A/7.4
Edwin Robertson Rd @ Oak Grove Rd
WB Left
A/7.5
A/9.2
NEB approach
A/9.1
A/7.5
Edwin Robertson Rd @ Site Access 2
WB Left
A/7.6
A/7.4
NB approach
A/9.5
13/10.5
Edwin Robertson Rd @ Site Access 1
WB Left
13/10.8
A/8.0
NB approach
E/36.6
F/252.2
Edwin Robertson/Shiloh Church
@ Woods dale Rd
EB approach
F/300+
F/276.3
WB approach
F/1 16.9
F/300+
NBL
A/7.4
A/7.3
SBL
A/7.3
A/7.3
Shiloh Church Rd @ US 501
EB approach
F/300+
F/300+
NBL
B/ 12.3
A/8.6
Chub Lake Road @ Country Club Rd
EB Left
A/8.0
A/7.9
SB approach
B/11.9
C/17.0
Legend: A/1.0 -LOS lettergrade/de lay in seconds pervehicle
Allstudy intersections are controlled bytwo-waystop signs, Existing (2017)geometryutibzed
Public access to Country Club Road is closed at Edwin Robertson Road, 2 site access points in place
TABLE 7: DESIGN YEAR 2027 PHASE I WITH
Intersection
IMPROVEMENTS - LOS SUMMARY
Approach
EB approach D/35.6
C/33.1
Edwin Robertson Rd @ Site Access 1
(Intersection improve ments:Traffic signal control,
dedicated left tum lane on WB approach,auxiliarylane in
EB direction, channelized right turns on EB and NB
approaches)
WB approach B/19.3
13/11.8
NB approach A/3.0
A/6.9
Intersection LOS B/17.6
A/8.7
Edwin Robertson/Shiloh Church
@ Woodsdale Rd
(Intersection inprovements:Traffic signal control,
dedicated left tum lanes on EB/WB approaches)
EB approach A/7.5
B/15.4
WB approach B/10.8
A/9.8
NB approach D/36.8
D/36.8
SB approach D/38.4
D/36.9
Intersection LOS B/13.2
B/15.4
Shiloh Church Rd @ US 501
(Intersection improvements:Traffic signal
control,dedicated left &right tum lanes on EB approach,
dedicated right tum lane on SB approach)
EB approach C/25.7
C/23.5
NB approach C/25.4
C/21.3
SB approach B/ 18.8
I
C/25.6
Intersection LOS C/22.7
C/23.5
BUILD CONDITION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 24 lt••t Q11)

I SOD
Y�!
T32a
`tea Fak�'Ro
be
Sze
It
F--I
��
%
Ry
OT
0
0
d
4
0.
Ay
cr`'``r
aso'sr�\or
—►
675' -� t t
Soni
o �
Ed
I
0
tar
Vj i
k
�
O
4
85
T3Z6
7
U
133_I
Proposed Lanes
—► Existing Lanes
A- Stop Control Approach
C14
b�e�e
Proposed Signal
Proposed Site
T
Note: Storage lengths are not shown where a through lane terminates as a mandatory tum lane
Total Storage Length (Turn lanes)
* - Additional EB through lane (+1-2000' long) to safely accommodate the merge of NB RT vehicles from Access 1 without
Existing turn lane extended to xx'
\
\
adversely impacting through traffic.
j Zapata-LJB, PLLC
3240 Burnt Mill Drive
Person
County Mega Site TIAFigure
13
Wilmington, NC 28403
Phase I
Geometric Recommendations
Pa a 25

PERSON COUNTY MEGASITE -TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • PERSON COUNTY, NC
Storage Lengths — Phase I
The required storage lengths for the turn lanes were estimated using 95`h percentile queues from Sim -
traffic simulation software, based on an average of 10 simulation runs. Table 8 summarizes the storage
lengths for turn lanes under Phase I scenario. Along with queue/storage lengths, the required
deceleration lengths based on the posted speed limit are identified to estimate the turn lane length that
safely accommodates queues and deceleration of vehicles entering the turn lane. Sim -traffic reports are
included in Appendix E.
TABLE 8: TURN LANE SIZING — PHASE I IMPROVEMENTS
Posted
StorageMovement Speed (mph) AM Peak PM Peak
Intersection: Site
Access 1(Fast access) @ Edwin Robertson Rd
WB left
55
264 135
275
575
850
NB Left
45
41 88
Through/
drop lane
NA
Through/
drop lane
NB Right
45
Free flow
Through/
drop lane
NA
Through/
drop lane
Intersection: Edwin Robertson Rd/Shiloh Church Rd @ Woodsdale Rd
EB left 55
30 112
125 575 700
WB left 45
18 14
50 300 350
Intersection: Shiloh
Church
Rd @ US 501
EB left
45
119
372
375
300
675
EB right
45
14
296
Through/
drop lane
NA
Through/
drop lane
NB left
55
320
143
325
575
900
SB right
1 55
1 184
94
200
1 575
1 775
Source: NCDOT's Policy on Street and Driveway Access to NC Highways for Decceleration distance based on
posted speed limit. Deccel length includes required taper length per the posted speed.
11
BUILD CONDITION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 26 L C11)

PERSON COUNTY MEGASITE -TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • PERSON COUNTY, NC
FULL BUILD ANALYSIS
Background Geometric Improvements
For 2027 Phase II, along with the expansion of south main campus, development is anticipated to
occur on the north side of the mega site. The following geometric improvements at Edwin Robertson
Road/Site Access 2 are anticipated to be constructed along with Phase I improvements to
accommodate all movements to/from the northern portion of the development.
> Convert Edwin Robertson Road/Site Access 2 from a 3 -leg to 4 -leg intersection.
> Install dedicated left turn lanes on all four approaches.
Capacity Analysis
Capacity analysis is completed for full build -out scenario using traffic volumes from Figure 12 and
above referenced geometric improvements along with Phase I geometry. Table 9 summarizes the
intersection LOS and delay from Synchro.
TABLE 9: DESIGN YEAR 2027 BUILD -OUT
- LOS SUMMARY
ApproachMovement/ ON
Edwin Robertson Rd @ McGhees Mill Rd
WB approach
B/11.3
13/12.7
SBL A/7.9
A/7.5
Edwin Robertson Rd @ Oak Grove Rd
WB Left
A/8.0
A/7.7
NEB approach B/10.7
A/9.9
Edwin Robertson Rd @ Site Access 21
EB Left
B110.5
A/8.0
WB Left A/9.6
A/7.7
NB Left F/300+
F/300+
SB Left F/300+
F/300+
Edwin Robertson Rd @ Site Access 11
EB approach
F/135.2
F/191.0
WB approach B/17.7
076.4
NB approach A/2.3
C/21.5
Intersection LOS C/27.1
F/101.8
Edwin Robertson/Shiloh Church
@ Woods dale Rd'
EB approach
B/10.2
F/300+
WB approach F/300+
B/15.6
NB approach F/290.2
F/86.2
SB approach F/93.1
F/793
Intersection LOS F/280.2
F/319.2
Shiloh Church Rd @ US 5011
EB approach
D/43.2
F/213,11
NB approach F/287.7
F/61.3
SB approach F/206.3
D/40.1
Intersection LOS F/222.4
F/165.8
Chub Lake Road @ Country Club Rd
EB Left
A/10.0
A/8.2
SB approach D/25.7
F/272.7
Legend: A/t0-LOS Icttergrade/delaymseconds pervehicle
Note (:Phase limprowments in place
As shown in Table 9, five (5) study intersections are anticipated to operate at a failing level of service,
E or F during AM and/or PM peak hour conditions. Additional geometric improvements are necessary
to improve the operating conditions and achieve an acceptable LOS. Recommended improvements for
the Full build scenario are summarized below and graphically shown on Figure 14.
BUILD CONDITION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 27 @ Q)

PERSON COUNTY MEGASITE -TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • PERSON COUNTY, NC
> Roadway improvements
• Widen Edwin Robertson Rd/Shiloh Church Rd from a 2 -lane section to a 4 lane section
between Site Access 2 and US 501. Install an auxiliary eastbound lane (3`d through lane)
for a length of 2000 feet as an add lane for the northbound right turn movement from Site
access 1.
Widen US 501 from a 2 -lane section to a 3 -lane imbalanced section on either side of
Shiloh Church Road for a reasonable length (+/- 2000 feet). The additional lanes will be
through lanes downstream of the intersection, i.e., an additional northbound through lane,
north of Shiloh Church Road and an additional southbound through lane, south of the
intersection. The additional northbound through lane is necessary to accommodate two
receiving lanes for dual eastbound left turn lanes and the second southbound through lane
will be an add lane for eastbound right turn lane to maintain a free flow movement.
The through lanes need to be long enough to maintain lane balance in the dual left turn
lanes and allow drivers to safely merge into traffic as US 501 tapers back to a single lane.
• Circulatory roadway (south side) on the mega -site will be a 4 -lane facility along with the
access drive on the north side of the site (Site access 2).
> Edwin Robertson Rd @ Site Access 2 (west access)
• Install a dedicated right turn lane on the westbound (575 feet) and southbound (425 feet)
approaches.
• Install dual right turn lanes on the northbound approach. The outside through lane
terminates as a dedicated right turn lane and the second right turn lane will be 600 feet
long.
• Install an additional left turn lane on the southbound and westbound approaches that will
result in dual left turn lanes on both approaches. While one of the through lanes terminates
as a dedicated left turn lane, the other turn lane will be 800 feet long.
• Install a traffic signal
> Edwin Robertson/Shiloh Church Rd @ Site Access 1 (east access)
• Extend existing left turn lane on the westbound approach to a total length of 950 feet.
• Install an additional left turn lane on the westbound approach (975 feet).
BUILD CONDITION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 28 I

PERSON COUNTY MEGASITE -TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • PERSON COUNTY, NC
• Install a right turn lane on the eastbound approach (400 feet).
• Install an auxiliary lane in the eastbound direction, east of the intersection for 2000 feet as
an add lane for the northbound right turn movement from Site Access 1.
> Edwin Robertson/Shiloh Church Rd @ Woodsdale Rd
• Install a right turn lane on the eastbound (450 feet) and southbound (500 feet) approaches.
• Extend eastbound left turn lane to a total length of 825 feet.
Shiloh Church Rd @ US 501
• Install an additional left turn lane (800 feet) on the eastbound approach. The approach
geometry is revised from a L -R to a L -L -R configuration
• Extend northbound left turn lane to a total length of 1025 feet and southbound right turn
lane to a total length of 975 feet.
• Install an additional right turn lane on the southbound approach (925 feet)
Install an additional left turn lane on the northbound approach (975 feet).
Country Club Rd @ Chub Lake Rd
Install a dedicated right turn lane on the westbound approach (425 feet) of Chub Lake Rd
and southbound approach (400 feet) of Country Club Rd.
• Install a traffic signal
BUILD CONDITION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 29 @ �1 t !
I

,328
r
LE
1d00
6P!7S
o
d
G
R00'""
°b�°
or
v m 575'
�i— R00'
133,
+'f
500'
\\
950'
,326
" �-Vr
1332
� Proposed Lanes (Phase II)
\
Phase I Improvements
Existing Lanes
Proposed Site 0646
Prop Signal ld�Pq
R5o' Total Storage Length (Turn lanes)
arf
rX Existing/Phase I turn lanes
R
Note: Storage lengths are not shown where a through lane terminates as a mandatory tum lane
extended to this total length.
\ 915
Auxiliary through lane (+1- 2000' long)
Zapata-LJB, PLLC
J 3240 Burnt Mill Drive
person County Mega Site TIAFigure
14
wilt» in =ton, NC 28403
Full Build Geometric
Recommendations
Page 30

PERSON COUNTY MEGASITE -TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • PERSON COUNTY, NC
The above geometric improvements are anticipated to improve LOS at study intersections to an
acceptable level of service. All study intersections are projected to operate at LOS `D'; or better as
shown in Table 10. Detailed Synchro output reports are provided in Appendix E.
It is to be noted that the intersection of Edwin Robertson Rd/Shiloh Church Rd at Woodsdale Road
will have a northbound approach operate at LOS `E', while the overall intersection LOS is `D' or
better. The traffic demand for this approach is minimal, and longer delay during peak periods is not
unusual for minor street movements while the major street heavy traffic is being served.
TABLE 10: DESIGN YEAR 2027 BUILD -OUT
Intersection
Edwin Robertson Rd @ Site Access 2
WITH IMPROVEMENTS
Approach
EB approach
- LOS
D/51.0
SUMMAR)
D/44.1
WB approach
B/14.1
B/19.6
NB approach
C/33.4
C/32.6
SB approach
D/41.6
D/35.8
Intersection LOS
C/25.9
C/32.7
Edwin Robertson Rd @ Site Access 1
EB approach
A/8.0
13/19.0
WB approach
B/15.8
C/26.2
NB approach
A/1.5
C/21.3
Intersection LOS
B/14.0
C/21.3
Edwin Robertson/Shiloh Church
@ Woodsdale Rd
EB approach
A/7.3
C/29.1
WB approach
C/35.0
B/12.7
NB approach
F/69.6
F/58.6
SB approach
D/44.1
C/32.9
Intersection LOS
C/32.3
C/26.7
Shiloh Church Rd @ US 501
EB approach
B/17.5
C/32.4
NB approach
C/28.3
D/40.2
SB approach
C/31.7
C/22.8
Intersection LOS
C/28.2
C/32.2
Chub Lake Road @ Country Club Rd
EB approach
B/17.9
C/31.2
WB approach
A/1.6
A/3.3
SB approach
A/8.0
B/14.6
Intersection LOS
A/5.0
B/12.3
Legend: A/1.0 -LOS letter grade/delay in seconds pervehicle
BUILD CONDITION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 31 @ f J ! J

PERSON COUNTY MEGASITE -TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • PERSON COUNTY. NC
Storage Lengths — Full Build
For proposed turn lanes, the recommended storage lengths based on 95`h percentile queues from Sim -
traffic are summarized in Table 11. The deceleration lengths for these turn lanes are identified based
on the posted speed limit design criteria.
TABLE 11: TURN LANE SIZING — FULL BUILD SCNEARIO IMPROVEMENTS
Posted
SpeedMovement Storage
Intersection: Site Access 2 (West access) @ Edwin Robertson Rd
EB Left
55
199
83
200
300
500
WB Left (2 lanes)
55
187/212
69/89
225
575
Lane l: Drop Lane
Lane 2: 800 ft
WB Right
55
Free flow
NA
575
575
SB Left (2 lanes)
45
59/129
426/490
Lane 1: 500 ft
Lane 2: 500 ft
300
Lane 1: Drop Lane
Lane 2: 800 ft
SB Right
45
60
121
125
300
425
NB Left
45
54
237
250
300
550
NB Right (2 lanes)
45
61/30
1 286/255
Lane 1: Drop Lane
Lane 2: 300 ft
300
Lane 1: Drop Lane
Lane 2: 600 ft
Intersection: Site Access 1(East access) @ Edwin Robertson Rd
EB Right
55
45
79
100
300
400
WB Left (2 lanes)
55
331/352
209/231
Lane 1: 375 ft
Lane 2: 375 ft
575
Lane 1:950 ft
Lane 2: 950 ft
NB Right
45
Free flow
Drop Lane
NA
Through/
drop lane
NB Left
45
14
1419
Drop Lane
NA
Through/
drop lane
Intersection: Edwin Robertson Rd/Shiloh Church Rd@ Woodsdale
Rd
EB Left 55 49 244 250 575 825
EB Right 55 4 135 150 300 450
WB Left 45 23 12 50 300 350
SB Right 45 178 72 200 300 500
Intersection: Shiloh Church Rd @ IS 501
EB Left (2 lanes)
45
94/149
447/1671
Lane 1: Drop Lane
Cane 2: 500 ft
300
Lane l: Drop Lane
Lane 2: 800 ft
EB Right
45
Free flow
Drop Lane
NA
Drop Lane
NB Left (2 lanes)
55
385/421
232/255
Lane l: 400 ft
Lane 2: 450 ft
575
Lane l: 975 ft
Lane 2: 1025 ft
SB Right (2 lanes)
55
366/333
110/33
Lane l: 400 ft
Lane 2: 350 ft
575
Lane 1: 975 ft
Lane 2: 925 ft
Intersection: Country Club Rd @ Chub Lake Rd
WB Right
45 117 15 125 300
425
SB Right
45 24 115 100 300
400
Source: NCDOT's Policy on Street and Driveway Access to NC Hi0iways for Decceleration distance based on posted speed limit. Deccel
length includes required taper length per the posted speed.
BUILD CONDITION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 32

PERSON COUNTY MEGASITE -TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • PERSON COUNTY, NC
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The proposed development is anticipated to accommodate over 6 million square foot semi -conductor
facility. Although an end user is yet to be determined, Person County anticipates to attract a semi-
conductor facility for this site. A preliminary site plan is developed and the development is anticipated
to occur in phases over a decade, Phase I is anticipated to be 2.35 million SF and Phase I1 to be 3.175
million SF for a total of 5.525 million SF in ten years. The site is located on either side of Edwin
Robertson Road near Country Club Road between Oak Grove Road and Woodsdale Road. The
following conclusions and recommendations are offered for the proposed development site.
> Based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual methodology, the Phase I development is estimated
to generate 13,444 daily trips and the Phase II is estimated to generate an additional 22,116
daily trips. The total estimated daily trips with both phases are 35,560 daily trips.
> Phase I development is anticipated to occur in 2 years, while Phase II development is
anticipated to occur in the next 10 years through the year 2027. Traffic analysis is completed
for both phases under the design year 2027 conditions. A 0.5% per year ambient growth is
assumed to account for background growth in the area.
> The proposed development eliminates public access to Country Club Road at Edwin Robertson
Road, instead a circulatory roadway will be constructed and two site access points will be in
place that connect Country Club Road to Edwin Robertson Road.
> No major roadway improvements are programmed in the Person County TIP for study roadway
segments. Widening of US 501 from a two/three-lane section to a four -lane section from
Roxboro to Virginia state line has been identified in the TIP as a planned improvement;
however, construction funds are not available at this time for this project.
• Geometric improvements are anticipated with each phase to achieve acceptable operating
conditions along study corridors and intersections. Improvements by phase are summarized
below.
> Phase I
• Edwin Robertson Rd @ Site Access 1 (east access)
- Install a dedicated left turn lane in the westbound direction (850 feet)
Install an auxiliary lane in the eastbound direction for a reasonable length (+/- 2000
feet) to accommodate the merge of northbound right turning vehicles.
Install a traffic signal
Channelize both eastbound and northbound right turn lanes. These lanes will not be
controlled by the traffic signal and traffic will be free flow as they have dedicated
receiving lanes.
• Edwin Robertson/Shiloh Church Rd @ Woodsdale Road
Install left turn lanes on the eastbound (700 feet) and westbound (350 feet) approaches.
Install a traffic signal
Shiloh Church Rd Co. US 501
-- Install a dedicated left turn lane on eastbound approach (675 feet) and a dedicated right
turn lane on southbound approach (775 feet).
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS 33 fill
I

PERSON COUNTY MEGASITE -TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • PERSON COUNTY, NC
- Extend northbound left turn lane from the existing storage length of 300 feet to 900
feet.
- Install a traffic signal
> Full build
• Widen Edwin Robertson Rd/Shiloh Church Rd from a 2 -lane section to a 4 lane section
between Site Access 2 and US 501. Install an auxiliary eastbound lane (3`d through lane) for
a length of 2000 feet as an add lane for the northbound right turn movement from Site
access 1.
Widen US 501 from a 2 -lane section to a 3 -lane imbalanced section on either side of Shiloh
Church Road for a reasonable length (+/- 2000 feet). The additional lanes will be through
lanes downstream of the intersection, i.e., an additional northbound through lane, north of
Shiloh Church Road and an additional southbound through lane, south of Shiloh Church
Road. The additional northbound through lane is necessary to maintain two receiving lanes
for dual eastbound left turn lanes and the second southbound through lane will be an add
lane for eastbound right turn lane to maintain a free flow movement.
The through lanes need to be long enough to maintain lane balance in the dual left turn
lanes and allow drivers to safely merge into traffic as US 501 tapers back to a single lane.
• Circulatory roadway (south side) on the mega -site will be a 4 -lane facility along with the
access drive on the north side of the site (Site access 2).
• Edwin Robertson Rd @ Site Access 2 (west access)
- Install dedicated right turn lanes on the westbound (575 feet) and southbound (425 feet)
approaches.
- Install dual right turn lanes on the northbound approach. The outside NB through lane
terminates as a dedicated right turn lane and the second right turn lane will be 600 feet
long.
- Install dual left turn lanes on the southbound and westbound approaches. On both
approaches, the inside through lane terminates as a dedicated left turn lane and the
other turn lane will be 800 feet long.
- Install a traffic signal
• Edwin Robertson/Shiloh Church Rd @ Site Access 1 (east access)
Extend existing left turn lane on the westbound approach to a total length of 950 feet.
Install an additional left turn lane on the westbound approach (950 feet).
- Install a right turn lane on the eastbound approach (400 feet).
- Install an auxiliary lane in the eastbound direction, east of the intersection for 2000 feet
as an add lane for the northbound right turn movement from Site Access 1.
• Edwin Robertson/Shiloh Church Rd @ Woodsdale Rd
- Install right turn lanes on the eastbound (450 feet) and southbound (500 feet)
approaches.
Extend eastbound left turn lane to a total length of 825 feet.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS 34 1 I

PERSON COUNTY MEGASITE -TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • PERSON COUNTY, NC
• Shiloh Church Rd @ US 501
- Install a second left turn lane (800 feet) on the eastbound approach. The approach
geometry is revised from a L -R to a L -L -R configuration.
Extend northbound left turn lane to a total length of 1025 feet and southbound right
turn lane to a total length of 975 feet.
Install an additional right turn lane on the southbound approach (925 feet)
Install an additional left turn lane on the northbound approach (975 feet).
• Country Club Rd @ Chub Lake Rd
— Install dedicated right turn lanes on the westbound approach (425 feet) of Chub Lake
Rd and southbound approach (400 feet) of Country Club Rd.
— Install a traffic signal
All study intersections are anticipated to operate at LOS `D' or better with recommended
improvements in place.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS 35 J