19890089 Ver 1_Complete File_19890101

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
Comments cone//er nYng an application for State Federal CAMA Permit(s) from C??t'/,jf%2r
-/0 %r!7 IT

a _44,6111-41,
/'II-14 ,
p' ?-
?-?- t ?EctJ Cvrl JL'?4 G??
A. PERMIT:
This office cannot comment on this project until after the close of the Section
40,11 Certification Public Comments Period.
Phis office has no objection to the issuance of the permit(s) for the proposed
project with the following conditions:
That the activity be conducted in such a manner as to prevent significant
increases in turbidity outside the area of construction or construction-
related discharge (increases of 25 NTU's or less are not considered
significant).
That the instream turbidity not be increased by more than 50 NTU's as a
result of the proposed activity after a reasonable opportunity for dilu-
tion and mixture. -
That turbidity levels in shall not be increased
by more than 10 NTU's as a result of the proposed activity after a reason-
able opportunity for dilution and mixture.
B. CERTIFICATION STATUS:
Certification is not required
for this project.
Certification is required for
this project. Such action to
process the certification has
been initiated. Proposed
Certification will be acted on
or after .
The proposed project is certified
under General Certification
A) No. 1179 issued on January 25, D) No. 1431 issued on October 16,
1977, for sewer line construction 1980, for boat ramp construction.
B) No. 1272 issued on November 10, E) No. 1664 issued on September 8,
1978, for bulkhead construction.
No. 1273 issued on November 10
F) 1983, for
No
1665 Rip-Rap Placement.
i
d
, . ssue
on September 19,
1978, for discharges of liquid 1983, for incidental bridge
effluent from diked upland disposal
areas. construction.

WATER QUALITY SECTION
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEI4ENT
MEMORANDUM
Date:
To:
From:
Through:
Subject:
September 11, 1989
Bill Mills
Planning Branch
- Fp Igaq
d' U? 1 ` • v
Tc:i r 7
James H. Gregson j{-tt9-- UeWil,
Wilmington R gional ff'c
Donald Safr't ?,-
Wilmington Regional Wfe
Regional Office Review and Recommendations
Application for Permit for Excavation and/or Fill
Project # 8908-F
Christian K. Edwards
New Hanover County
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to construct 2
service dock systems, a travel lift, a storage building and
maintenance dredging of the existing basin.
ADJACENT WATER BODY: Carolina Beach Yacht Basin
CLASSIFICATION: SB STATUS: Closed
The project has been reviewed to determine impacts to water
quality. The following comments have been provided.
1. The project will require a 401 Water Quality Certification.
2. The project complies with the General 401 Water Quality
Certification No. 1272 for the discharge of liquid effluent
from a diked disposal area resulting from hydraulic
dredging.
3. The proposed project should be done in such a way as to not
cause the turbidity outside the immediate construction are
to exceed 25 NTU.
This office has no objection to the project as proposed.
JHG:8908-F.SEP
cc: DCM - Marc Botbol
Jim Gregson
WiRO, CF
MEMORANDUM
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Date: September 11, 1989
To: Bill Mills
Planning Branch
From: James H. Gregsonf06p
Wilmington R gional ff'c
Through: Donald Safr't ?m-
Wilmington Regional.Wf-e
Subject: Regional Office Review and Recommendations
Application for Permit for Excavation and/or Fill
Project # 8908-F
Christian K. Edwards
New Hanover County

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to construct 2
service dock systems, a travel lift, a storage building and
maintenance dredging of the existing basin.
ADJACENT WATER BODY: Carolina Beach Yacht Basin
CLASSIFICATION: SB STATUS: Closed
The project has been reviewed to determine impacts to water
quality. The following comments have been provided.
1. The project will require a 401 Water Quality Certification.
2. The project complies with the General 401 Water Quality
Certification No. 1272 for the discharge of liquid effluent
from a diked disposal area resulting from hydraulic
dredging.
3. The proposed project should be done in such a way as to not
cause the turbidity outside the immediate construction are
to exceed 25 NTU.
This office has no objection to the project as proposed.
JHG:8908-F.SEP
cc: DCM - Marc Botbol
Jim Gregson
WiRO, CF

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. Applicant's name
Christian K. Edwards
L. Location of project site West side of Carolina Beach Yac}lt Basin
New Hanover County - New Photo 17-212 Grid N-0, 14
3.
4.
5.
6.
Investigation type: Dredge & Fill X CAMA X
Investigative procedure: (A) Dates of site visit 8/4/89 8/10/89'
(B) Was applicant present Yes Yes
Processing procedure: Application received 8/2/89 Office WiRO
Site description: (A) Local Land Use Plan Carolina Beach
Land Classification from LUP Developed
Development constraints identified in LUP None
for projects of this nature.
(B) AEC(s) involved: Ocean Hazard Estuarine Shoreline X
Coastal Wetlands Public Trust Waters X
Estuarine Waters X Other
7.
(C) Water dependent: Yes No Other
(D) Intended use: Public Private X Commercial
(E) Type of waste water treatment: Existing Septic tank
Planned Tie into Carolina Beach Municipal System
(F) Type of structures: Existing Bulkhead, Office, Concrete Pad
Planned Travel Lift, Docking System, Storage Buildine
(G) Estimated annual rate of erosion - Source -
Habitat description: AREA
Dredged Filled Other
(A) Vegetated wetlands:
N/A
(B) Non-vegetated wetlands:
Open Water (Basin) 2300 cu yards
(C) Other:
X
3858 so ft.
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 2300 cu yards 3858 sq ft.
8. Project Summary The applicant proposes to construct 2 service dock systems,
a travel lift, a storage building and maintenance dredging of the basin area
Christian K. Edwards
Page two
9. PROJECT D:;SC.ZI1'7-1ON
10
The project site is located on the west bank of the Carolina Beach yacht basin
at the junction with Snow's Cut, New Hanover County. There was a former permit
issued for the site which allows the construction of approximately 30 slips, a
210' bulkhead, a 390' floating dock, a travel lift and the dredging of the
basin area measuring approximately 400' x 210'. This permit was issued to
Yacht Heaven Marina Inc. an ajoining marina, and was to address both/properties
in one permit entity.
Since issuance of the permit, the partnership was dissolved and Yacht Heaven
Marina Inc. did not exercise the option on this particular property. Mr.
Christian K. Edwards, the former partner has now exercised the option to
purchase and develop the property into a service marina. This action
has prompted Yacht Heaven Marina Inc. to object strongly (see attached letter)
to the project. The waters in the project area has been downgraded since
issuance of the permit from SA to SB, secondary nursery and are closed to the
taking of shellfish. The average water depths in the basin area ranges between
-8 mlw to -12' mlw.
The highground features include a framed building, and a concrete slab. The
tract of land is approximately 1.74 acres and is mostly pervious with little
vegetation.
The applicant proposes to develop the tract into a service marina to include on
the waterfront a 355'x6' floating service dock to be located at the north end,
a 288'x6' floating dock on the south end, and a travel lift located on the
north end with rails measuring approximately 70' long and 20' apart. Also
proposed is the maintenance dredging of the basin area to include the
excavation of approximately 2300 cubic yards of sand/mud material. The spoil
will be confined on high ground in a designated diked area that measures
approximately 175'x80x8, with a spillway pipe extending below the m.l.w. The
high ground development will consist of the construction of a storage building
measuring approximately 60x20x12 to be located at the center of the property
(see attached plot).
ANTICIPATED IMPACTS
The docks as proposed will cover an area of water approximately 3858 square
feet. Current regulations allows for 27 square feet of dock space for each
linear foot of shoreline. The 210' of shoreline is adequate to satisfy that
regulation. This project is a scale down of what was first permitted under
permit #126-87 issued on July 1, 1989. However this application is being
contested by Yacht Heaven Marina Inc. and their attorney. No long term
negative impact is expected as a result of this project.
submitted by: Marc Botbol Date: August 14, 1989 Office: Wilmington
Please type or print. Carefully describe all anticipated
developmment activitics, including construction, excava-
tion, filling, paving, land clearing, and stonnwater con-
trol. If the requested information is not relevant to your
project, write N/A (not applicable). Items 1-4 and 8-9
st be complete,: for all protects.
1 Applicant
a. Name
Address j/'1-030 .5
City G? ?i/Iy)1 rxl AW State f /?-
Zip 2--C3 Day phone

&710C ILandowner or Authorized aecnt
b. Project name (if any)
c. If the applicant is not the landowner, also give the
owner's name and address.
?
ILI
2 Location of Proposed Project
a. Street address or secondary road number
Ei?d- t--),c ?5fi;?Corte f?-arlo"y IT_
b. City, lowri, communty, or landmark
old ykr x
c. County /? l l J zf i? 0 tle'tl-
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction?
c. Name of body of water nearest roje t
i4le- 411)&1e_ 6L7&,- 1q7Yt4t1&
F44-vctcogsi%l-L /lAl,wi74
3 Description and Planned Use
of Proposed Project
a. Describe all development activities you propose (for
example, building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead,
or pier). _ f=Lvr ??
J!26? IL, ?L
If you plan to build a marina, also complete and-
attach Form DCM-MP-2.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an
existing pro cct, new work, or both?
c. Will the project be for community, private, or
commercial ql e?.
d. Describe the plammed use of ttmc_projc?t
4 Land and Water Characteristics
a. Size of entire tract i -,7q l,-
b. Size of individual lot(s)
c. Elevation of tract above mean sea level or
National Geodetic Vertical Datum
r ? .
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
l?v? 5 f?-/1 n
e. Vegetation on tract (I a1' ee i `
f. an-made, features now on/tract ?( ?. 61ilettt?
?G???t}l??
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan Classification of
the site? (Consult the local land use plan.)
Conservation Transitional
Developed Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
X4 /
i. How are adjacent waters classified?
j. Has a professional archaeological survey been
carried out for the tract? 26 If so, by whom?
am-
JUL 25 1989
OFFICE OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
Una MKIrrnN orrioNOi nuiu
5 Upland Development
Complete this section if the project includes any land
development.
a. Type and number of buildim s, facilities,I or 1
structures pF0pOscd :5' (_' << ;C. (,?%/i
b. Number of lots or parcels JM-
c. Density (Give the number of residential units and the
units per acre.)__ ,"114 -
?v
2?1 Mei
J! 1L ???3_lcago
ntPIOF-8F GD?aT "rAfifi ,iENI
in. Water supply source
n. If the project is oceanfront development, describe
the steps that will be taken to maintain established
public beach acces(swa) s or provide new access.
d. Size of area to be graded or disturbed
o.
- i) r1)( v lir'•
e. If the proposed project will disturb more than one
acre of land, the Division of Land Resources must
receive an erosion and sedimentation control plan at
least 30 days before land disturbing activity begins.
If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion
control plan been submitted to the Division of Land
Resources?
f. Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet of
mean high water to be covered by impermeable
surfaces, such as pa ement, buildings, rooftops.
13 ° ? 7_ ;c?LTI
g. List the materials, such as marl, paver stone, asphalt,
or concrete, to be used for paved surfaces.
rY1Rt'?, e O,, 7 fiZ, 7'?-,
h. If applicable, has a stormwater management plan
been submitted to the ivision of Environmental
Management? A,ITI
i. Describe proposed sewage disposal and/or waste .
water treatment facilities.
j. Have these facilities received state or local approval?
k. Describe existing treatment facilities.
If the project is on the oceanfront, what will be the
?ea level of the first habitable
elevation above m04
floor? 6 Excavation And Fill Information

a. Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation
or fill activities (excluding bulkheads, which are
covered in Section 7).
Access channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
Boat basin
Other (break-
water, pier,
boat ramp,
rock jetty)
Fill placed in
wetland or below
MHW
Upland fill
areas
Length .Width Depth

J?lq-

i`? i J ??-
/_-( .
b. Amount of material to be excavated from below
water level in cubic yards UOa
c. Type of material ?v
d. Does die area to be excavated include marshland,
swamps, or other wetlands?
1, Describe location and type of discharges to waters of V-C)
the state (for example, surface runoff, sanitary e. High ground excavation, in cubi yards
wastewater, indu trial/commercial effluent, "wash /V P
down"). T?
f. Dimensions of spoil disposal area ;
?A-' Y I/fI
n ;
g. Location of spoil disposal area oozy yr6r>"' a
Do you claim title to the disposal area'? If
If not, attach a letter granting permission fr m the
owner.
Will a disposal area b available for future
maintenance? e_5
If so, where? f') ') )l?
Does the disposal area include any marsliland,
swamps, or water areas? _ r
k. Will the fill material be pl?ccd below mean high
water? /_ LI
1. Amount of fill in cubic yards 61A
m. Type of fill material Al/A
n. Source of fill material
o. Will fill material be placed on, arch or other
wetlands? 0
p. Dimensions of the wetland to?)c filled
I- A,
q. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled?
L.
r. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, raglbackho , o hydraulic f
dredge)? '1'V }?i?i{?t ?IC'(71L
s. Will wetlands be ?rosscd in transporting equipment
to project site? /-10 If yes, explain steps that will
be taken to lessen environmental impacts.
7 Shoreline Stabilization
it. Length of bulkhead or riprap 7?/p
b. Average distance water-ward of mean high water or
normal water level
c. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 montltie, in
feet ?4IIk1 ,w?N
d. 'T'ype of bulkhead Material 1,{;,') "O
e. Amount of fill, in cubic yards to be placed below
mean high water 1??f
-7'
f. Type of fill material _ ???14=
8 Additional Information
In addition to the completed application form, the follo%-,-
ing items must be submitted:
A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other
instrument under which the applicant claims title to the
affected property. If the applicant is not claiming to be
the owner of said property, then forward a copy of the
deed or other instrument under which the owner claims
title, plus written permission from the owner to carry out
the project.
An accurate work plat (including plan view and cross
sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black ink on an S
1/2 x 11 white paper. (Refer to Coastal Resources
Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if 16 N -h
quality copies are provided by applicant. (Contact the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding that agency's
use of larger drawings.) A site or location map is a part
of plat requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed
to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
site. Include county road (SR) numbers, landmarks, and
the like.
A storinwater management plan, if applicable, that
may have been developed in consultation with the
Division of Environmental Management.
A list of the names and complete addresses of the ad-
jacent waterfront (riparian) landowners. These in-
dividuals have 30 days in wNch to submit comments on
the propoSCd.f)roject to the Division of Coastal Manage-
ment and $hot ;?,J?yftl? p licant of that op-
portunity.
?UV
JUL 25 1089
OFFICE OF COASTAL MANAOGMINI
WILMINGTON REGIONAL M14
Name f b4 b o ('L0)
Address
Name
Name
Address
A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
pe latee, and issuin dates. f
A chuck for $100 made payable to the Department of
Natural Resources and Community Development to
cover the costs of processing the application.
A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront
and inlet areas.
A statement on the use of public funds. If the project
involves the expenditure of public funds, attach a state-
ment documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to 10).
9 Certification and Permission
to Enter on Land
Any permit issued in response to this application will
allow only the 6evelopment described in the application.
'T'ile project will be subject to conditions and restriction:,
contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's ap-
proved Coastal Management Program and will be con-
ducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I further certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in
fact, grant permission to representatives of state and
federal review agencies to enter on the aforementioned
lands in connection with evaluating information related
to ttvs permit application and follow-up monitoring of
project.
This is the . day of 19
X
La? o?inc?o -A onze 'cnt
i
JUL 25 1989
OFFICE OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
WILMINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
Form DCM-MP-2
y3i
ADEVEIAttach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit. Be sure to complete all other sections of the
Joint Application which relate to this proposed project,
including upland areas, even if duplicative. All shore-
based facilities must be included in application and work
plats.
1 MARINA CHARACTERISTICS
a. Check below the type of marina proposed.
Commercial I/ Public Residential
b. Will the marina be open to the general public?
C-7 :5
C. If there is residential development associated with
the marina, how m y units or lots are planned?
d. Chec all of the types of service to be provided.
Full service, including travel lift and/or rail
Dockage, fuel, and marine supplies
Dockage ("wet slips") only
Number of slips D
Q Dry storage
Number of boats O
0 Boat ramp(s)
Other (describ9
C. Check below the proposed type of siting.
Land cut and access channel
Open water with dredging for basin
i/ and/or channel
Open water, no dredging required
Other (describe)
„ Tta ? yx? T
JUL 25 1989
OFFICE OF COASTAL !0,0AGWEN`
WILMINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
Describe the typical boats to be served (for example,
open runabout, chart r boats, sail boats, mixed
-
types). W.I.
g. Typical boat length 3-0 .r
Maximum boat length `75
Are any floating buildings planned? A
If so, describe.
2 MARINA OPERATIONS
Check each of the following sanitary facilities which
will be included in the proposed project.
? Office toilets
Toilets for patrons
Number t
Location ?i FI'U I& Showers
Boat holding tank pumpout
Type and location
Describe treatment type and location for all sanitary
wastewater. rX l5i 1' 5 C,i? f i L,
C. Describe solid aste, fish offal, and trash disposal.
j r cc 5 j ??iYx? l?'c lz'I y??G
u
73nnbN?
rs v c^
i v
S ? ~
v \5'1-7 ?? -

Q.
-..
c NAT
U 3 rj "
1

v -
a ,
O

i

I-
i t)

4 ?
L
0
r
\ J \
In W
I pl?
\ .A
1 \ ?? \ N ?'• ? I 1 0 ? ? ? 7 ,
2 -J
? \ J -? ? C E-. ? ? 2 Z Q q
--

rt

?n J

J _
P

? -L N v
a
" I
V? I
_
], r " I
3
? `I ? v -• 3 I ?
o J -? d, z i ?
0. c
4 U o o l

w , a F- ? ' I
_

J -
r,
I ?
Y ?
7, ri F, T4
Y
J
w
s
. 2
?{ cP
J
3n
qF
a

LI. nl i i;J I?III jl
T
?J
s ?- (30
a
lL
1.1 0!
Lei

°
3 0
.
O H
J
u
Li
I
I i
O
J
ry)
2
W
?3 n
rG ?
N
W
"-:?nrr3nV 1SI .
`J
Lr, I
?l
?! I
I
J ?
?" G
'H1Q
rrt
Cr)
A Op
lf-j
o
J
Z
W W
W l?
Q O
Z J
L O
J ?
W
Q =
O O
U ?
LL ti
O
W
U
S
t1
O
Q
? LI
ld
vl
ll ?-
C
7
o J Cp
a ? M
Q 4 i
0
? v J
Z

M?ll
4 IIJ

J
•L
H 4
1
? J
t/1
v1 V L,I
-?
o

E-
_' r' r o
Q
1

O
F W -i

O
'Ec
cq F-- W
C/)
J O O
D U ?-

lf LL- '
? O J
y
W
d
U)
J
J
li!
-2
I 2 a
? ~ Q
A ? O
? U
a o 0
a of ? ?
v ? P-
0
U
u
v
?n
0
f'
r
0
Z
0
0
3 ?
? y
l
,
,f

?
3
1 -

CYJ
L
i
i
+1
I l\
I`
. 2
j-
CL
7
? Q
c? ? y
G'
d
s
i-
1
T•
L'J
t'.L
Lu

c>

lzc
- -
?J

I lli

U

?J
I

I j
i
T?c?
r ?
100 Spencer i-arlow Drive o
ar'olina Beach, N,C. 28426
[phone]
[phone]
July 08, 3959
Fax [phone],19
Coastal Yacht Service
2030 East?'Ood r',oad S'iite
lVilMling-ton, INC. 28403
Subject : L,r yls Property
Dear Sirs:
I all, in receipt of yotu' letter ?;>hich
pz operty states
7 a xire7;be: that ou ,
?'c pLl.'Ch'a --il
-? Lion; ?;nd questions: - -
l) Yotu' plan trk:t Yo'? s?,?xri ttt?-? t? v
h the c?istin'8 D, achir Brokers Inc is not consiste,?t
plan unuld inter f a ` Czmit nc'3? head b
er with the existing by Yacht Brokers Inc. 1'(,
1
asld would impact atzr c perrdt Auld basin, as
urrent mooring of boats. it is today,
2) Your plan does not conform to the conditional use
Yacht Brokers 111c. on the .Lewis pr
operty, ??rmit existing by
a) 1Yater and sewer is not discussed,
b) Fire protection is not discussed.
C) Spoils area is not sufficient,
d) As You lmow Most of the z
a Spoil and d Lewis property has been used in the past
a,s a oil and
lifu? n suchit secros that you would noc be able to
move the ground. surface without first stabilizing
`=) if this is a service o
waste oil and debris, pe.ration, you have not discussed run off of
-T'uof this ro rther, You have not discussed the de?vatering
Oft ,rp posed spoil area. As you know the water table on the
I .perty is about 4' and a spoil are Of water on this site and then run a would only mean
propert off could impact Yacht BrokerssnTnc.
Y You should have a storm drain systc-P installed prior '"d
during any such under takings,
to tile believe this plan you have sub?jlitte-•d is no rnoz e
I
ccnmin_ty, ti-1n a nusiance
3) Your letter indicates
mould ask, i Coastal that Coastal Yacht service i5 the
sue, and if so I tal tht Se:r c? and Coastal "'.t-trya?l Yacht Sal scInc, thel
3'CiU.I' (1 41."'Yt t0 SeCU2'e a service
facility C AMA permit is no more than an attanpt to as?_ for r? lesser
p@1TTdt to be used for a amore ribid Ck.".1A application. DDes C.o«stal
Yacht Service have a right to do business in :worth Carolina?
~') Sorge of the questions I have are as follows;
1) M)at is a. service docl??
Iffiat is a floating service dock?
3) will this service dock be FOR SALE?
4) Will this floating dock be FOH SAUE?
5) How does a person acquire a floating; dock?
6) Hoer will parking be provided?
7) Will you rent floating; service docks to others?
8) If you sell these docks, can they resell the same?
9) How will utility service be provided to the service docks?
10) Who will operate the service dock on a day to day basis?
11) Will there be any other facilities at the service docks?
12) Cffiat is Coastal Yacht Service?
13) V)That is the time fratne?
14) How am I assured these service docks will be effectively operated
as a first class service facility?
15) How will I be assured that this sen ice facility will be mintained
and operated first class?
16) 1'rhat are the terms of the purchase of the Lewis property?
17) Will the service facility coll£-?ct slip fees operating and rrantaininr these p ees to defray the ?ti t of
18) ??i11 these doc:l s i„ ? docks?
be insp&cted by' a firm with ' ez;ertis <e in tr. ;:marina
industry?
19) Frill these docks be des.iEmed by an engineering fi -,?
in the niaxina industry? rtn with c .?,?rtise
5) The most important issue is one of environrr-ntal assessrrrent. It. has
been noted and observed that the rs?tt,ds property for years has been a
site of dumping and misuse of everything fr(urr boat trotors to underground
fuel tanks. I believe that there is a need to determine and docunent the
presence of hazardous constituents in the soil and ground water from
the uncontinued aquifer. I feel there may be an
endangerment to the public health and welfare or the environmentbduetoal
the release and/or threatened release of hazardous substances fro:, the
Lewis property. The objective of ground water investigation is to define
environmental problems which may exist as a result of activities in the
past. The fact that the Lewis property is an old boat yard site, it is
possible that in addressing contamination on the fillets areas, additional
hazardous constituents could be fonted. The degree of the aquifer and soils will need to be establishedGZ Itvshouldcbean up
pointed out that the rtTnedy of contaminated aquifers can take mrjnths or
year's to achieve, depending on the aquifer restoration criteria.
Yacht Brokers Inc,
1V) 3ar114y faoo, Gr,ra a Carolina OWCh. 11 C. Z6426
e?wr........,«

?,2_o a ?rese
6) ?-catse of ed
the ? nce of fuel
pc rtY and the obsez?T fuc,., ,, and oil tams that
should be ?? fi??i1 oil spills on tivere on the
ii.dat Y-)oint tes? conducted i the property
«ast0 material, ,? or clan. there
bin pushed o?? a.Y ri=teri<? F si.f'icatians of
sYiould be z, over the bulgy-?je
1 or r sera, the site
r>ed off site, Pushed against tiro bull?l1?ad?'`ave
In c:)nclrj sipn, z j,.oald
and stud' done say that that r need,
tills site ?hlpriar to the issuing Of wto be a lot of invest
ti lon
is lm , property has bee. C: ,tA pc,, r,it or a t
5 to ?ntinUe V:?ou1d be 'abused for yep z s and i1y pezmi t on
nnanent environmental a iota! to ages
?jpact, disregard for ?-bbe?t that
For all re future and
oppose thls a PZz?tlpnnd others unans?,
erod question,
z tivill be available to help
Sufic, r ,.
l?
A. J. aulsg er, Jr.
?'res ?cien,
I would strongly
locate and show you photos of under
gz•olmd pxobleryls,
cc: blr.. Marc Botbo.l, COMA
Rountree & Seaga,! Attorney at
haw
Yacht Br
44.pMN F? I okers inc,