NC0087912_Fact Sheet_20181203

Fact Sheet
NPDES Permit No. NCOO87912
Permit Writer/Email Contact Derek Denard, [e-mail]:
Date: 03Dec2018
Division/Branch: NC Division of Water Resources/NPDES Complex Permitting
Fact Sheet Template: Version 09Jan2017
Permitting Action:
N Renewal
❑ Renewal with Expansion
❑ New Discharge
❑ Modification (Fact Sheet should be tailored to mod request)
Note: A complete application should include the following:
• For New Dischargers, EPA Form 2A or 2D requirements, Engineering Alternatives Analysis, Fee
• For Existing Dischargers (POTW), EPA Form 2A, 3 effluent pollutant scans, 4 2' species WET
tests.
• For Existing Dischargers (Non-POTW), EPA Form 2C with correct analytical requirements based
on industry category.
Complete applicable sections below. If not applicable, enter NA.
1. Basic Facility Information
Facility Information
Applicant/Facility Name:
Speedway, LLC/ Speedway #6973
Applicant Address:
500 Speedway Drive, Enon, OH 45323
Facility Address:
13960 Capital Boulevard, Youngsville, NC 27587
Permitted Flow:
Not Limited
Facility Type/Waste:
Minor Groundwater Remediation; 100% industrial
Facility Class:
Physical Chemical Not Classified WPCS
Treatment Units:
• a 1,500 -gallon pre -cast oil/water/sand separator,
• a 2,000 -gallon Kleerwater oil/water separator,
• associated PVC piping
• a discharge to into the existing storm sewer line
Pretreatment Program (Y/N)
No
County:
Franklin
Region
Raleigh
Briefly describe the proposed permitting action and facility background: Speedway, LLC has applied for
NPDES permit renewal, and submitted a renewal application dated January 22, 2018. This facility is a
Page 1 of 8

groundwater remediation system for recovery of diesel fuel products which utilizes an oil / water
separator. The application provides the following details for this facility:
The treatment works at the facility consists of an ABT, Inc. 512AF Ductile Iron Frame and Grate
installed around the east, west and south sides of the diesel fuel canopy. The trench drain is
installed inside the drip -line of the canopy and sloped so rainfall and/or surface water does not
enter the drain. Flow captured by this grate is discharged through six-inch diameter PVC piping
to a 1,500 -gallon capacity, pre -cast concrete oil/water/sand separator. Discharges from this unit
are directed to a 2,000 -gallon capacity Kleerwater oil/water separator. Discharges form this unit
are directed through six-inch diameter PVC piping, which ultimately ties into the existing storm
sewer line at the southeast corner of the site, BOD, TSS, nitrogen and phosphorus removal are not
included in the design of this system.
2. Receiving Waterbody Information:
Receiving Waterbody Information
Outfalls/Receiving Stream(s):
Outfall 001- UT to Richland Creek
Stream Segment:
27-21-(1.5)
Stream Classification:
WS-1V;NSW
Drainage Area (mi2):
-
Summer 7Q10 (cfs)
0
Winter 7Q 10 (cfs):
0
30Q2 (cfs):
0
Average Flow (cfs):
0
IWC (% effluent):
100%
303(d) listed/parameter:
Not 303(d) listed (see attached 2016 Integrated Report p. 637)
Subject to TMDL/parameter:
Requires nutrient monitoring (TN/TP).
Subbasin/HUC:
03-04-02 [HUC 030202010701] Neuse
USGS Topo Quad:
Grissom, NC
3. Effluent Data Summary
No discharge occurred for the period Oct2013 through Mar2018.
Page 2 of 8

4. Instream Data Summary
Instream monitoring may be required in certain situations, for example: 1) to verify model predictions
when model results for instream DO are within 1 mg/1 of instream standard at full permitted flow; 2) to
verify model predictions for outfall diffuser; 3) to provide data for future TMDL; 4) based on other
instream concerns. Instream monitoring may be conducted by the Permittee, and there are also
Monitoring Coalitions established in several basins that conduct instream sampling for the Permittee (in
which case instream monitoring is waived in the permit as long as coalition membership is maintained).
If applicable, summarize any instream data and what instream monitoring will be proposed for this
permit action: NA
Is this facility a member of a Monitoring Coalition with waived instream monitoring (YIN).- NA
Name of Monitoring Coalition: NA
5. Compliance Summary
Summarize the compliance record with permit effluent limits (past 5 years): No data.
NOV-2018-LR-0042 was issued for a late/missing July 2018 DMR.
Summarize the compliance record with aquatic toxicity test limits and any second species test results
(past 5 years): NA.
Summarize the results from the most recent compliance inspection: See attached Compliance Evaluation
Report 11/21/2017 (BIMS export).
6. Water Quality -Based Effluent Limitations (WQBELs)
Dilution and Mixin.. Zones
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2B.0206, the following streamflows are used for dilution considerations
for development of WQBELs: 1 Q 10 streamflow (acute Aquatic Life); 7Q 10 streamflow (chronic Aquatic
Life; non -carcinogen HH); 30Q2 streamflow (aesthetics); annual average flow (carcinogen, HH).
If applicable, describe any other dilution factors considered (e.g., based on CORMIX model results): NA
If applicable, describe any mixing zones established in accordance with 15A NCAC 2B. 0204(b): NA
Oxygen -Consuming Waste Limitations
Limitations for oxygen -consuming waste (e.g., BOD) are generally based on water quality modeling to
ensure protection of the instream dissolved oxygen (DO) water quality standard. Secondary TBEL limits
(e.g., BOD= 30 mg/l for Municipals) may be appropriate if deemed more stringent based on dilution and
model results.
If permit limits are more stringent than TBELs, describe how limits were developed: NA.
Page 3 of 8

Ammonia and Total Residual Chlorine Limitations
Limitations for ammonia are based on protection of aquatic life utilizing an ammonia chronic criterion of
1.0 mg/l (summer) and 1.8 mg/1(winter). Acute ammonia limits are derived from chronic criteria,
utilizing a multiplication factor of 3 for Municipals and a multiplication factor of 5 for Non -Municipals.
Limitations for Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) are based on the NC water quality standard for protection
of aquatic life (17 ug/1) and capped at 28 ug/1(acute impacts). Due to analytical issues, all TRC values
reported below 50 ug/1 are considered compliant with their permit limit.
Describe any proposed changes to ammonia and/or TRC limits for this permit renewal: NA.
Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA) for Toxicants
If applicable, conduct RPA analysis and complete information below.
The need for toxicant limits is based upon a demonstration of reasonable potential to exceed water quality
standards, a statistical evaluation that is conducted during every permit renewal utilizing the most recent
effluent data for each outfall. The RPA is conducted in accordance with 40 CFR 122.44 (d) (i). The NC
RPA procedure utilizes the following: 1) 95% Confidence Level/95% Probability; 2) assumption of zero
background; 3) use of/z detection limit for "less than" values; and 4) streamflows used for dilution
consideration based on 15A NCAC 213.0206. Effective April 6, 2016, NC began implementation of
dissolved metals criteria in the RPA process in accordance with guidance titled NPDES Implementation of
Instream Dissolved Metals Standards, dated June 10, 2016.
Since there was no data, a reasonable potential analysis was not conducted for the review period between
Oct2013 through Mar2018.
Toxicity Testing Limitations
Permit limits and monitoring requirements for Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) have been established in
accordance with Division guidance (per WET Memo, 8/2/1999). Per WET guidance, all NPDES permits
issued to Major facilities or any facility discharging "complex" wastewater (contains anything other than
domestic waste) will contain appropriate WET limits and monitoring requirements, with several
exceptions. The State has received prior EPA approval to use an Alternative WET Test Procedure in
NPDES permits, using single concentration screening tests, with multiple dilution follow-up upon a test
failure.
Describe proposed toxicity test requirement: NA.
Mercury Statewide TMDL Evaluation
There is a statewide TMDL for mercury approved by EPA in 2012. The TMDL target was to comply with
EPA's mercury fish tissue criteria (0.3 mg/kg) for human health protection. The TMDL established a
wasteload allocation for point sources of 37 kg/year (81 lb/year), and is applicable to municipals and
industrial facilities with known mercury discharges. Given the small contribution of mercury from point
sources (-2% of total load), the TMDL emphasizes mercury minimization plans (MMPs) for point source
control. Municipal facilities > 2 MGD and discharging quantifiable levels of mercury (>1 ng/1) will
receive an MMP requirement. Industrials are evaluated on a case-by-case basis, depending if mercury is a
pollutant of concern. Effluent limits may also be added if annual average effluent concentrations exceed
Page 4 of 8

the WQBEL value (based on the NC WQS of 12 ng/1) and/or if any individual value exceeds a TBEL
value of 47 ng/l.
Describe proposed permit actions based on mercury evaluation: NA.
Other TMDL/Nutrient Management Strategy Considerations
If applicable, describe any other TMDLs/Nutrient Management Strategies and their implementation
within this permit: Individual TN/TP effluent monitoring was maintained for this permit renewal to
comply with a nutrient permitting strategy for the Neuse River Basin. The receiving stream is currently
classified as Nutrient Sensitive Waters.
Other WQBEL Considerations
If applicable, describe any other parameters of concern evaluated for WQBELs: For Naphthalene the
monthly average limit and the daily maximum limit have been updated to 12 gg/L, which is the North
Carolina Protective Value for Surface Waters.
If applicable, describe any special actions (HQW or OR W) this receiving stream and classification shall
comply with in order to protect the designated waterbody: NA.
If applicable, describe any compliance schedules proposed for this permit renewal in accordance with
15A NCAC 2H. 0107(c)(2)(B), 40CFR 122.4 7, and EPA May 2007 Memo: NA.
If applicable, describe any water quality standards variances proposed in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.3(e) and 15A NCAC 2B.0226for this permit renewal: NA.
7. Technology -Based Effluent Limitations (TBELs) — NA
8. Antidegradation Review (New/Expanding Discharge):
The objective of an antidegradation review is to ensure that a new or increased pollutant loading will not
degrade water quality. Permitting actions for new or expanding discharges require an antidegradation
review in accordance with 15A NCAC 2B.0201. Each applicant for a new/expanding NPDES permit must
document an effort to consider non -discharge alternatives per 15A NCAC 2H.0105( c)(2). In all cases,
existing instream water uses and the level of water quality necessary to protect the existing use is
maintained and protected.
If applicable, describe the results of the antidegradation review, including the Engineering Alternatives
Analysis (EAA) and any water quality modeling results: NA.
9. Antibacksliding Review:
Sections 402(0)(2) and 303(d)(4) of the CWA and federal regulations at 40 CFR 122.44(1) prohibit
backsliding of effluent limitations in NPDES permits. These provisions require effluent limitations in a
reissued permit to be as stringent as those in the previous permit, with some exceptions where limitations
Page 5 of 8

may be relaxed (e.g., based on new information, increases in production may warrant less stringent TBEL
limits, or WQBELs may be less stringent based on updated RPA or dilution).
Are any effluent limitations less stringent than previous permit (YES/NO): NO.
If YES, confirm that antibacksliding provisions are not violated: NA.
10. Monitoring Requirements
Monitoring frequencies for NPDES permitting are established in accordance with the following
regulations and guidance: 1) State Regulation for Surface Water Monitoring, 15A NCAC 2B.0500; 2)
NPDES Guidance, Monitoring Frequency for Toxic Substances (7/15/2010 Memo); 3) NPDES Guidance,
Reduced Monitoring Frequencies for Facilities with Superior Compliance (10/22/2012 Memo); 4) Best
Professional Judgement (BPJ). Per US EPA (Interim Guidance, 1996), monitoring requirements are not
considered effluent limitations under Section 402(0) of the Clean Water Act, and therefore anti -
backsliding prohibitions would not be triggered by reductions in monitoring frequencies.
For instream monitoring, refer to Section 4.
11. Electronic Reporting Requirements
The US EPA NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule was finalized on December 21, 2015. Effective
December 21, 2016, NPDES regulated facilities are required to submit Discharge Monitoring Reports
(DMRs) electronically. Effective December 21, 2020, NPDES regulated facilities will be required to
submit additional NPDES reports electronically. This permit contains the requirements for electronic
reporting, consistent with Federal requirements.
12.Summary of Proposed Permitting Actions:
Table. Current Permit Conditions and Proposed Changes
Parameter
Current Permit
Proposed Change
Basis for Condition/Change
Flow
Not limited.
No change
15A NCAC 213.0505
TSS
MA 30 mg/1
A monthly average
TBEL. Secondary treatment
DM 45 mg/l
limit of 30.0 for Total
standards/40 CFR 133 / 15A NCAC
Suspended Solids
2B .0406. Monthly average limit
(TSS) has been added.
rule is found in 40 CFR 122.45 (d.)
The daily maximum
limit has been changed
to 45.0 mg/L.
Page 6 of 8

Total Nitrogen
Monitor Only
No change
WQBEL. Required individual
TN/TP nutrient monitoring per
current Neuse permitting strategy,
and to comply with NC chl-a WQS.
15A NCAC 2B.0200.
Total Phosphorus
Monitor Only
No change
WQBEL. Required individual
TN/TP nutrient monitoring per
current Neuse permitting strategy,
and to comply with NC chl-a WQS.
15A NCAC 213.0200.
Oil & Grease
Monitor Only
EPA method 1664
See 15A NCAC 02B .0211 (12).
(Revision A or B)
using Silica Gel
Treated N -Hexane
Extractable Material
(SGT -HEM; Non-
polar Material) by
Extraction and
Gravimetry shall be
used to monitor for Oil
& Grease.
Naphthalene
DM 105 gg/L
MA and DM limits
IRIS & ECOTOX 8/10
have been updated to
12 gg/L, the North
Carolina Protective
Value for Surface
Waters.
MGD — Million gallons per day, MA - Monthly Average, WA — Weekly Average, DM — Daily Max
We have made the following changes for the final permit:
1. The facility classification Physical Chemical Not Classified WPCS was added to the effluent
page.
We have made the following updates for the permit renewal:
2. The facility map has been updated.
3. The stream segment information for Richland Creek has been updated. The unnamed
tributaries surrounding the Speedway #6973 facility outfall flow to stream segment 27-21-
(1.5), which is currently classified WS-IV;NSW. No permit limits were affected by this
update.
4. A monthly average limit of 30.0 for Total Suspended Solids (TSS) has been added. The daily
maximum limit has been changed to 45.0 mg/L. Federal guidelines [40 CFR 122.45 (d.)]
require both monthly average and daily maximum limits.
5. EPA method 1664 (Revision A or B) using Silica Gel Treated N -Hexane Extractable Material
(SGT -HEM; Non -polar Material) by Extraction and Gravimetry shall be used to monitor for
Oil & Grease.
6. For Naphthalene the monthly average limit and the daily maximum limit have been updated
to 12 gg/L, which is the North Carolina Protective Value for Surface Waters.
Page 7 of 8

13. Public Notice Schedule:
Permit to Public Notice: 06/15/2018
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0109 & .0 111, The Division will receive comments for a period of 30 days following
the publication date of the public notice. Any request for a public hearing shall be submitted to the
Director within the 30 days comment period indicating the interest of the party filing such request and the
reasons why a hearing is warranted.
14. Fact Sheet Addendum (if applicable):
Were there any changes made since the Draft Permit was public noticed (Yes/No): Yes.
If Yes, list changes and their basis below:
1. The facility classification Physical Chemical Not Classified WPCS was added to the effluent
page.
15. Fact Sheet Attachments (if applicable):
• Final 2016 Integrated Report p. 637.
• Compliance Evaluation Report 11/21/2017, BIMS export, 3 pages.
• Regional Office Comments, 3 pages.
• MEMORANDUM Review of Discharge to Surface Waters Designated Water Supply (WS).
• Public Notice Affidavit of Publication.
Page 8 of 8

Final 2016 Integrated Report -All Assessed Waters
EnVrrmvzMtd Middle Neuse River Subbasin Neuse River Basin
a+ty
Assessment Unit Name Assessment Unit Description
Assessment Unit Number Water Quality Classification Length/Area Units
Mosely Creek
From source to Falling Creek
27-77-2
C;Sw,NSW
Assessment Criteria Status
Reason for Rating Parameter of Interest
Meeting Criteria
< 10% LH (4.3 su, AL, Sw)
Meeting Criteria
< 10% pH (9.0, AL, FW)
Meeting Criteria
< 10% Turbidity (50 NTU, AL, FW miles)
Meeting Criteria
< 10% [Water Temperature (322C, AL, LP&CP)
(Meeting Criteria
'< 10%
Dissolved Oxygen (4 mg/I, AL, FW)
Meeting Criteria
FCB AP GM<200 and <209/.]
Fecal Coliform (GM 200/400, REC, FW)
Mosley Creek
27-84
From source to Neuse River
5.2 FW Miles
Category
1
1
1
1
1
1
C;Sw,NSW 12.7 FW Miles
Assessment Criteria Status
Reason for Rating
Parameter of Interest
Category
Data Inconclusive
Not Rated
Fish Community (Nar, AL, FW)
3a
4/11/2018 2016 Integrated Report -All Assessed Waters Page 667 of 1306
Fish tissue assessments for mercury apply to all waters and are not individually listed

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 IN 1 2 15 I 3 I NC0087912 111 12 I 17/11/21 I17 18 I S J 19 LG] 201 I
211111 1 1 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 166
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA ----------------------Reserved-------------------
67 70 I I 71 I I 72 I r l 73 I I 174 751 I I I 1 1 1 I80
u ty I I i
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES oermit Number)
09:15AM 17/11/21
13/08/01
Speedway #6973
13960 Capital Blvd
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
Wake Forest NC 27587
10:OOAM 17/11/21
18/03/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Dan Smith, 13960 Capital Blvd Wake Forest NC 27587/Store Manager/919-569-0075/
Yes
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit 0 Operations & Maintenance 0 Records/Reports 0 Effluent/Receiving Waters
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Jason T Robinson RRO WQ///
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page#

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type (Cont.)
NCO087912 111 121 17/11/21 1 17 18 ICI
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
1. A change in ownership was requested in June 2016. A new permit was issued on August 7, 2017
reflecting this change in ownership (the previous owner was WilcoHess LLC).
2. The facility is currently permitted to discharge into and unnamed tributary of Richland Creek, a
class -C Nutrient Sensitive Water (NSW) in the Neuse River Basin. The current permit expires on
March 31, 2018. A request for a permit renewal should be submitted at least 180 days prior to the
expiration of the current permit. Our database does not show that a renewal application has been
submitted. If this is the case, please submit a renewal application.
3. The system collects runoff from around the diesel pumps via a drain grate that surrounds the
pumps. The drain is covered by an overhang. The runoff then flows through three 1,500 -gallon
precast oil/water and sand separators and a 2,000 -gallon oil/water separator, all in series. The system
then discharges to a roadside ditch along Wall Rd.
At the time of the inspection, all treatment units appeared to be well maintained. Mr. Fischer visits the
site at least weekly. He explained that he removes leaves from the grating and stores them in barrels
by the nearby dumpsters. Oil sorbent is also stored in the barrels. Zebra Environmental & Industrial
Services or A&D Environmental Services pumps the contents from all four tanks approximately twice a
year.
Mr. Fischer used an oil probe during the time of the inspection to measure the oil layer in the tanks.
There was minimal oil in the first tank, and none in the other three tanks.
4. The facility has not reported flow in at least the last year due to regular pumping of the tanks.
5. The right of way to the outfall was properly maintained and there was no sign of recent discharge or
a visible sheen.
6. The operator keeps a log book with details of weekly inspections and water and oil levels in all
tanks. Please make sure to keep the log books going back at least three years.
Page#

Permit: NCO087912 Owner - Facility: Speedway #6973
Inspection Date: 11/21/2017 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Yes No NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
0
❑
Permit
Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new
❑
0
❑
❑
application?
❑
❑
0
❑
Is the facility as described in the permit?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
❑
0
❑
❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Permit expires on March 31. 2018. Our database does not show a renewal beina received
as of 12/7/17.
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: Oil level measured with probe
Effluent Pipe
Yes No NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
0
❑
❑
❑
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
❑
❑
0
❑
Comment:
Page# 3

Denard, Derek
From: Manuel, Vanessa
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2018 1:11 PM
To: Denard, Derek
Cc: Smith, Danny
Subject: RE: Draft NPDES Permit NC0087912 - Speedway, LLC - Speedway #6973
I spoke with the staff who conducted the 2017 inspection & he said there were no recent treatment
installations. Looking at an older inspection report from 2012, the treatment system is described as consisting of a
1500 -gallon precast O/W/S separator (three 500 -gallon tanks in series). On the renewal application, the permittee
indicates a 1500 -gallon capacity O/W/S separator. Based on this, it looks like the current description is most likely
accurate. No change needed to the draft permit.
From: Denard, Derek
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2018 12:35 PM
To: Manuel, Vanessa <[e-mail]>
Cc: Smith, Danny <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Draft NPDES Permit NC0087912 - Speedway, LLC - Speedway #6973
Vanessa,
Why haven't they ever requested a permit modification changing 1 to 3 O/W/S? These are treatment units for
wastewater. I don't see where they have made a request in the permit renewal application or the previous renewal.
Derek C Denard
Environmental Specialist
Compliance & Expedited Permitting Unit
N.C. Division of Water Resources
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality
919 807 6307 office
derek.denard(a)-ncdenr.gov
N. C. Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Permitting Section - NPDES
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Manuel, Vanessa
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2018 11:28 AM
To: Denard, Derek <[e-mail]>
Cc: Smith, Danny <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Draft NPDES Permit NC0087912 - Speedway, LLC - Speedway #6973

Derek —
After reviewing the draft permit, I offer the following comment:
■ Supplement to Permit Cover Sheet: description of treatment components — the first component description
should be changed from 1 to 3 —1,500 gallon pre -cast O/W/S separators. During the last inspection, staff
observed three of these units in operation (all in series). Therefore, the draft permit should be updated to
reflect the additional units.
Thanks for the opportunity to review and comment on this draft permit.
-Vanessa
From: Denard, Derek
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 4:04 PM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: Smith, Danny <[e-mail]>; Manuel, Vanessa <[e-mail]>; Kinney, Maureen
<[e-mail]>
Subject: Draft NPDES Permit NC0087912 - Speedway, LLC - Speedway #6973
Attention: Mr. Helms:
In response to your request to renew the subject NPDES permit, the Division of Water Resources (DWR or the Division)
hereby transmits this draft for your review and comment. Please review this document to assure your understanding of the
permit limits and monitoring conditions, and to correct errors, if any.
The Division understands that you have made no significant changes to your facility since the last permit renewal. We
have made the following updates to your previous permit:
1. The facility map has been updated.
2. The stream segment information for Richland Creek has been updated. The unnamed tributaries surrounding
the Speedway #6973 facility outfall flow to stream segment 27-21-(1.5), which is currently classified WS-IV;NSW.
No permit limits were affected by this update.
3. A monthly average limit of 30.0 for Total Suspended Solids (TSS) has been added. The daily maximum limit has
been changed to 45.0 mg/L. Federal guidelines require both monthly average and daily maximum limits.
4. EPA method 1664 (Revision A or B) using Silica Gel Treated N -Hexane Extractable Material (SGT -HEM; Non -polar
Material) by Extraction and Gravimetry shall be used to monitor for Oil & Grease.
5. A monthly average limit and daily maximum limit for Naphthalene has been updated to 12 µg/L, which is the
North Carolina Protective Values for Surface Waters.
Concurrent with this notification, the Division will solicit public comment on this draft by publishing a notice in
newspapers having circulation in the general Franklin County area, as required by the NPDES Program. Please provide
your comments, if any, to me via email [[e-mail]] or write to my attention care of DEQ/ DWR / NPDES
Program no later than July 13, 2018. Your written comments are welcome but not mandatory.
Following the mandatory 30 -day public comment period, the Division will review all pertinent comments on your permit
draft, and take appropriate action prior to issuing your NPDES permit final. If you have questions concerning this draft,
please e-mail me or call my direct line [phone].

Sincerely,
Derek C Denard
Environmental Specialist
Compliance & Expedited Permitting Unit
N.C. Division of Water Resources
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality
919 807 6307 office
derek.denardancdenr.aov
N. C. Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Permitting Section - NPDES
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

6
i
Water Resources
Environmental Quality
June 13, 2018
ISI I flu C��;7��� 111► I
To: Allen Hardy
Engineering Supervisor (DWR/PWSS)
Raleigh Regional Office
From: Derek C. Denard
DWQ / NPDES Program
919-807-6307; Fax [phone]; [e-mail]
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Interim Director
Subject: Review of Discharge to Surface Waters Designated Water Supply (WS)
• unnamed tributary to Richland Creek [27-21-(1.5)], WS-V;NSW, Neuse River Basin;
• Renewal of Individual NPDES Permit for minor (<1MGD), 100% industrial
for: Permit Renewal NPDES NCO087912
Speedway, LLC - Speedway #6973
located at 13960 Capital Boulevard, Youngsville, NC 27587
Franklin County
Please provide your comments by July 13, 2018 [email OK]
SPONSE:
I concur with the issuance of this permit provided the Permittee properly operates and
maintains the facility; the Permittee meets the stated effluent limits prior to discharge; and the
discharge does not contravene the designated water quality standards.
I concur with issuance of the above permit provided the following conditions are met:
I oppose the issuance of the above permit based on reasons stated below, or attached:
Signed: ML,,, —�-L
cc: file IN 'IV 6
Date: (tet
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality
1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
919-707-9000

0 Powered by
mccia"
The Nears & Observer
215 S. McDowell St
Raleigh, NC 27601
MEDIA COMPANY 919_629-4500
consult. strateg. izedeliver.
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
Account # Ad Number Identification PO Cols Lines
104811 0003716734 1 Wastewater Permit - Neuse River/ Neuse River Basin 1 44 j
Attention:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
COUNTY OF WAKE
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of
RALEIGH, NC 276991617
Johnston County, North Carolina, duly
commissioned and authorized to administer
-----------------------------------
oaths, affirmations, etc., personally appeared
Public Notice
North Carolina Environmental
BETSY WOMBLE, who being duly swom or
Management Commission/NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
affirmed, according to law, doth depose and
Raleigh, NC 27699.1617
Notice of Intent to Issues
say that he or she is Accounts Receivable
NPDES wastewater Permit
The North Carolina Environmental
n
Specialist of the News & Observer Publishing
Management Commission proposes to
issue a NPDES wastewater discharge
Company, a corporation organized and doing
rmit tPerson(s) below.
Written to the
the pro-
business under the Laws of the State of
_
Posed Permit will be accepteduntil 30
days after the publish date of this notice.
North Carolina, and publishing a newspaper
The Director of the NC Division of Water
Resources (DWR) may hold a public
known as The News & Observer, Wake
hearing should there be a significant de-
gree of public interest. Please mail com-
County and State aforesaid, the said
ments and/or information requests to
DWR at the above address. Interested
newspaper in which such notice, paper,
Persons may visit the DWR at 512 N. Sal-
isbury Street, Raleigh, NC to review in-
document, or legal advertisement was
formation
o ons NPDESIPerAdditional and this notice
published was, at the time of each and every
may bG found qri qur website: http:1/deq.
nc.pov/about drvisions/water-resource- __
such publication, a newspaper meeting all of
wafer-resources-permitslwasiewo er-
Granc n -was ewe er au f c
noticesor by calling [phone].
the requirements and qualifications of Section
Speedway, LLC applied to renew
1-597 of the General Statutes of North
NPDES Permit [NC008/9121 for Speed-
way #6973, 13960 Capital Boulevard,
Carolina and was a qualified newspaper
Youngsville, Franklin County, discharg-
ing treated desel fuel -based wastewater
within the meaning of Section 1-597 of the
to Richland Creek, Neuse River Basin.
Jerry G. Williams & Sons, Inc. Jerry G.
General Statutes of North Carolina, and that
Williams & Sons, Inc. applied to renew
NPDES permit (N00085936), 524
as such he or she makes this affidavit; and is
Brogden Road, Smithfield, Johnston
County, discharging stormwater and
familiar with the books, files and business of
wet -decking wastewater the Neuse Riv-
er, Neuse River Basin.
said corporation and by reference to the files
N&o: June 152918
of said publication the attached advertisement
for DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
was inserted in the aforesaid newspaper on
dates as follows:
•s„rpnnrrprrrr
441
Z•
Pulav
ON GO��•••.
"��4rrrrrrrrr���”
Insertion(s)
Published On:
June 15, 2018
BETSY WOMBLE, Accounts Receivable
Specialist
Sworn to and subscribed before me this
15th day of June, 2018
My Commission Expires: 6/8/2021
L
Notary Signet re