20181626 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20181127

DWR
IDIOM n of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
tial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned * Version#*
20181626 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
• Fee received Reviewing Office*
r Fee needed - send electronic notification Asheville Regional Office - [phone]
Select Project Reviewer*
Zan Price:eads\gaprice
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Old Haw Creek Road @ Greenbriar Road Sanitary Sewer Replacement (2012109)
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
W. Hunter Carson
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
11/27/2018
Nearest Body of Water
Haw Creek
Basin
French Broad
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
Latitude: Longitude:
(S1)35.596203,(S2)35.597265,(S3)35.594504(S1)-82.510208,(S2)-82.510430,(S3)-82.509408
A. Processing Information U
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Buncombe
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
* Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
f- Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
rJ Nationwide Permit (NWP)
F- Regional General Permit (RGP)
F Standard (IP)

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
F Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
F Individual Permit
12 - Utility Lines
r 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
r Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r- Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r- Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
O Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
W Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
r' Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Metropolitan Sewerage District - Easement holder
2b. Deed book and page no.:
Various
2c. Responsible party:
Metropolitan Sewerage District of Buncombe County, NC
2d. Address
Street Address
2028 Riverside Dr.
Address Line 2
CKY
Asheville
F stal / Zip Cade
28804
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
State / Frovinoe / Pagion
NC
Ceuntry
USA
2f. Fax Number:
r Yes r^ No
r Yes r^ No
C. Project Information and Prior Project History v
1. Project Information

1b. Subdivision name:
(d appropriate)
Haw Creek
1c. Nearest municipality/town:
Asheville
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
(S1) 9659-60-7330, (S2) 9659-60-4837, (S3) 2b. Property size:
9658-69-8659 (S1) 0.43, (S2) 2.82, (S3) 0.43
2c. Project Address
Street Address
(S1) 260 Old Haw Creek Road, (S2) 85 Cisco Road, (S3) 3 Haw Creek Trace
Address Line 2
qty
State / Ftovinoe / fbgion
Asheville
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
28805
USA
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Haw Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
French Broad
3d. Please provide the 12 -digit HUC in which the project is located.
060101050604
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
Stream crossings are proposed on three different properties, all of which are privately -owned residential lots. All three lots are a mix of grassed and wooded areas, with the areas along
the stream being primarily wooded.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
USGS Topo Map.pdf
524.67KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
NRCS Soil Survey Map.pdf 813.32KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
N/A
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
(S1) 256 LF, (S2) 355 LF, (S4) 39 LF
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
This project is to replace an existing sanitary sewer line which is in poor condition. The existing vitrified clay pipe will be replaced with a new ductile iron pipe system with gasketed joints
which will reduce potential of exfiltration of sewer flow, and infiltration from groundwater.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The overall project consists of replacing approbmately 3,755 linear feet of ebsting 6 -inch sanitary sewer line that is in poor condition and is undersized. The ebsting vitrified clay sewer
line will be replaced with 8 -inch ductile iron pipe. The lines to be replaced are located in the Haw Creek neighborhood in east Asheville. There are a total of three (3) proposed stream
impacts associated with this project, referred to below as S1 through S3. All of the stream impacts cross an unnamed tributary to Haw Creek, a tributary stream which ranges in width
from approbmately 5 ft. to 7 ft. within the project boundaries. Line replacement at each of the three locations will be in the same trench as the eAsting sewer line. Stream impacts S1 and
S2 are for a new 8" main sewer line, while S3 is for a smaller, 6" residential service line. No new (additional) crossings are proposed. MSD has acquired a 20 ft. wide permanent
easement over all line segments associated with this project.
Stream impacts for this project will be permanent at location S1 (use of rip rap to stabilize steep bank), and temporary at locations S2 and S3 (use of coir matting for stream bank
restoration).
Equipment to be used will be a trench excavator and other small equipment normally associated with sewer pipe installation. Upon completion of the pipe installation, the excavator and
other small equipment will be used to grade the disturbed area back to its original ground contour. Those areas will then be seeded and mulched.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Stream Impact Drawings.pdf 2.39MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*

r Yes r No r Unknown
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
3a. Reason for impact (?)
1. Impacts Summary
3c. Type of impact*
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
3e. Stream Type *
F Wetlands W Streams -tributaries r Buffers
3g. S. width *
F Open Waters r Pond Construction
❑
3. Stream Impacts
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
23
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
66
3j. Comments
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
43
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation U
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
This project utilizes areas which have previously been developed for the eAsting sewer and where ongoing sewer line maintenance occurs. To
minimize erosion during construction, silt fencing will be installed between the construction area and stream banks where a potential for runoff eAsts.
Where concrete pipe encasement is proposed under stream beds, concrete will be cured for a minimum of 24hrs prior to replacing native stream bed
material.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
The construction limits have been minimized so that disturbances are within epsting areas previously disturbed. Project specs will require that the
Contractor clear the Permanent Easement area and only those portions of the Temporary Construction Easement (TCE) as necessary to safely and
adequately perform the construction tasks. Tree removal and soil disturbances in the TCE shall be held to a minimum.
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type *
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type *
3f. Type of
3g. S. width *
3h. Impact
❑
(?)
Jurisdiction*
length*
S1
Sewer Crossing
gAverage
Permanent
Excavation
UT to Haw Creek
Perennial
Corps
4
23
(feet)
(linearfed)
gp
Sewer Crossing
Temporary
Excavation �Fow
Creek
Perennial
Corps
5
28
Average (feet)
(linear fed)
S3
Sewer Crossing
Temporary
Excavation
UT to Haw Creek
Perennial
Corps
4
15
Average (fed)
(linear feet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
23
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
66
3j. Comments
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
43
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation U
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
This project utilizes areas which have previously been developed for the eAsting sewer and where ongoing sewer line maintenance occurs. To
minimize erosion during construction, silt fencing will be installed between the construction area and stream banks where a potential for runoff eAsts.
Where concrete pipe encasement is proposed under stream beds, concrete will be cured for a minimum of 24hrs prior to replacing native stream bed
material.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
The construction limits have been minimized so that disturbances are within epsting areas previously disturbed. Project specs will require that the
Contractor clear the Permanent Easement area and only those portions of the Temporary Construction Easement (TCE) as necessary to safely and
adequately perform the construction tasks. Tree removal and soil disturbances in the TCE shall be held to a minimum.

2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Total stream impacts less than 150 linear feet and no wetland impacts
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) U
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
If no, explain why:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?*
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This project involves replacement of existing sanitary sewer lines. No line extensions are being proposed for additional development.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated
at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
This project is for the installation of a newsewer main Mich will provide better flows, reduce infiltration/exfiltration between the natural stream flows
and the sewer flows, and will reduce sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs). It is anticipated that replacing the existing line with a new ductile iron line will
reduce sewer flow rates from this area, and overall flow into MSD's treatment plant. MSD's treatment plant has a permitted capacity of 40mgd and
average daily flow is currently approx. 21 mgd.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No C Unknown

5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r^ Yes r No
5f. Will you cut anytrees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r- No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r- Yes r No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
Have not confirmed if Endangered Species are present within project area.
Consultation Documentation Upload
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Have not confirmed if project area is within Essential Fish Habitat. There are no impacts to trout streams.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NCHPO GIS Service
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
HPO Map.pdf
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
r- Yes r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
DFIRM Map Panel 9659 (Map No. 3700965900J)
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
691.79KB
v
Signature v
*
W By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
William Hunter Carson
Signature
Sign
Date
11/27/2018

Buncombe County, NC, State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, NGA, USGS
Soil Map—Buncombe County, North Carolina
(NRCS Soil Survey Map)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
4/30/2018
Page 1 of 43939600393980039400003940200394040039406003940800394100039396003939800394000039402003940400394060039408003941000362200362400362600362800363000363200363400363600363800364000364200364400
362000 362200 362400 362600 362800 363000 363200 363400 363600 363800 364000 364200 364400
35° 36' 13'' N 82° 31' 23'' W35° 36' 13'' N82° 29' 48'' W35° 35' 23'' N
82° 31' 23'' W35° 35' 23'' N
82° 29' 48'' WN
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
0 500 1000 2000 3000
Feet
0 150 300 600 900
Meters
Map Scale: 1:11,000 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:12,000.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Buncombe County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 14, Sep 26, 2017
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Sep 7, 2009—Nov
15, 2016
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Soil Map—Buncombe County, North Carolina
(NRCS Soil Survey Map)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
4/30/2018
Page 2 of 4
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
CkB2 Clifton clay loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
8.7 2.0%
CkC2 Clifton clay loam, 8 to 15
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
23.9 5.4%
CkD2 Clifton clay loam, 15 to 30
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
45.8 10.4%
CuB Clifton-Urban land complex, 2
to 8 percent slopes
27.4 6.2%
CuC Clifton-Urban land complex, 8
to 15 percent slopes
67.9 15.5%
CuD Clifton-Urban land complex, 15
to 30 percent slopes
70.8 16.1%
EdF Edneyville-Chestnut complex,
50 to 95 percent slopes,
stony
0.8 0.2%
EvD2 Evard-Cowee complex, 15 to
30 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
2.5 0.6%
EvE2 Evard-Cowee complex, 30 to
50 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
0.7 0.2%
EwD Evard-Cowee complex, basin,
15 to 30 percent slopes,
stony
3.2 0.7%
EwE Evard-Cowee complex, basin,
30 to 50 percent slopes,
stony
25.0 5.7%
FrA French loam, 0 to 3 percent
slopes, occasionally flooded
7.8 1.8%
TaB Tate loam, 2 to 8 percent
slopes
1.6 0.4%
TaC Tate loam, 8 to 15 percent
slopes
29.8 6.8%
TaD Tate loam, 15 to 30 percent
slopes
4.0 0.9%
TkD Tate loam, 15 to 30 percent
slopes, very stony
1.7 0.4%
TmB Tate-Urban land complex, 2 to
8 percent slopes
20.6 4.7%
TmC Tate-Urban land complex, 8 to
15 percent slopes
38.5 8.8%
Ud Udorthents, loamy 3.1 0.7%
Soil Map—Buncombe County, North Carolina NRCS Soil Survey Map
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
4/30/2018
Page 3 of 4
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
UfB Udorthents-Urban land
complex, 0 to 5 percent
slopes, occasionally flooded
8.8 2.0%
UhE Udorthents-Urban land
complex, 2 to 50 percent
slopes
40.7 9.3%
Ux Urban land 4.8 1.1%
W Water 0.8 0.2%
Totals for Area of Interest 438.9 100.0%
Soil Map—Buncombe County, North Carolina NRCS Soil Survey Map
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
4/30/2018
Page 4 of 4
RIP -RAP STREAM BANK PROTECTION
GOUKAS PROPERTIES, LLC
DB 5509 PG 740 ElFW
PIN: 9659-60-6239
GH RAILROAD TIE WALL. �'-
TRACTOR TO REMOVE PRIOR
:ONSTRUCTION & REINSTALL. '
LACE TIMBERS DAMAGED FROM i
STRUCTION.
i
APPARENT'\
DEED GAP X
RAILROAD i
FFE BASE.:
2147.4'
CO �
s "
DECK
\ W/STEPS
:27156.1'
STA. 7+35.53 LINE "A"
REMOVE & REPLACE 4' DIA. M
N: 690,243.54'
E: 956,736.83'
RIM: 2,144.93'
RQ INV. IN: 2,140.71'
N AD `INV. OUT: 2140.57'
��ON f
RIP RAP STREAM BANK PROTECTION
51A. tf+41.y4 LINt "A
RIM = 2145.95'
CO
r�� 6 SCP
BJ p X
OSEDSS
6 1P l APPARENT �-
DEED GAJ / _ p►_
jr
/ CONCRETE PEDESTAL
Soo (SUPPORTING SEWER LINE)
MH #7
STA. 8+42.94 LINE "A"
SMH-MSD #60-18631
N: 6901348.05'
E: 9569712.05'
RIM: 21146.96'
INV. IN: 21144,75'(A)
INV. IN: 2,142.32'(B)
INV. OUT: 2,142.31'(C)
DENISE DOUGHERTY PALAS
REVOCABLE TRUST 1/14/2010
DB 5537 PG 718
PIN: 9659-60J330
J
170
50
130
N.C. GRID NORTH
NAD83(2011) NAVD88
STREAM IMPACT N O. 1 PLAN
SCALE: 1 "=30'
STREAM IMPACT NO. 1 PROFI LE 19
SCALE: HORIZ: 1 "=30' VERT.:1 "=10'
p I
U
ce
Qr
Q z
Lu
Z
cd O L11 �- ao 0
M
l7 U ^ 6
EL
ui
OC H Q
C�
LL]
G U)
U Lu
-� ce
O O Q N O
O �IL
IL
o Q

I COIR EROSION
� CONTROL MATTING
I
L POPLAR B°
-t,.,�g.' _ �,
N05° 23' 35"E 312.35 LE o ®. _ _ y�a�Y
,�-
�..,� SILT FENCE / � �`-'',
'``. �
'`� //-� � f /f �
��
-�_-elf •:�_a
_��"' APPARENT . ��
0 'IDE�ED GAP
i _
Cn � „00.0 l -a � HANLEY( SYLVIA C. �
\ � f-IANLEY JOHN J.
DB: 4569 P: 1152
PIN: 9659-60-8747
L � tSU
2170
STEPHEN DAVID FEREN
DB 4596 PG 521
PIN: 9659-60-4837
BOUNDARY LINE
PER
DB 4596 PG 521
_ -' �;
r
.//r� � ��
BOUNDARY
LINE PER
DB 3695 PG 515
PB 29 PG 13
�:
-��lY;�-_._
f r - - , fDEED G.9
/ � , �% � / EIP 1'
i �-� ,���` , _
if
_
�'
_
za°
X-
•tiF�/" A DCREEK ICO � �� � �
s -, (TOP Ej EV. � �-
`'-2152,5' (F�FUTURE r
��Li�6ERVICE PER SPDS) / � wi
� �� lam/ A J � _f �i�DiNE�i2"
f/ PC3PLAR 18" f/i/� � ��
COIR EROSION
CONTROL MATTING
2160 � -
2150- �
- 8" D.I.P. @ 2.49%
32' OF CONCRETE
- ENCASEMENT UNDER CREEK
2140
JUDITH CHAET
DB 3695 PG 515
PB 29 PG 13
PIN: 9659-60-8815
W
�'
U
U'
Z
EXISTING
GROUND
��
N.C. GRID NORTH
NAD83(2011) NAVD88
STREAM IMPACT NO. 2 PLAN
SCALE: 1 "=30'
STREAM IMPACT NO. 2 PROFI LE
SCALE: HORIZ: 1 "=30' VERT.:1 "=10'
fV
� I
�--' �
.� �
a--,
Q � mN �
.�
a� � z �
c� O w z �
� o
:~U � �M
� lJ U r� u
� � Cu' � ui
� - �
O
� � � � �
,� � U W
.o � Q N =
O O = O �
O ��
Q

NORMAN P. DAVIES
DB 4623 PG 799
PB 133 PG 193, LOT 1
ANDREW L. BUDDENBURG PIN. 9658-69-7880
DB 5115 PG 1838
PB 58 PG 99, LOT 3
PIN: 9658-69-8659
MH #2
STA. 2+23.90 LINE "A" QEF
REMOVE & REPLACE 4' DIA. MH
SMH-MSD #6041294
N: 689,774.50' I
E: 956,936.03'
RIM: 2,126.98'
N INV. IN: 2,124.67' (A) I
INV. IN: 2,123.29'(B)
INV. IN: 2,122.10'(C)
INV. OUT: 2,121.95'(D) `1
REPLACE EXISTING 6" AERIAL SERVICE LINE
WITH 6" BURIED DIP & CONCRETE ENCASEMENT. CO t �!
E CUST 28
PROVIDE MIN. 6" COVERAT CREEK INVERT. , CREE X . JCP FtME
AT CLEANOUT, PROVIDE 6" DI WYE WITH +� CX 20 PE
PVC TRANSITION GASKETS. ='
EIR #5
SILT FENCE
e
WILLIAM G. LINDSEY ���
\ DB 3326 PG 569 ,f/�cR�el< '
anti /+
PB63PG71
PIN: 9658-79-Q676
CREEK
'l �ry�GGGZ,
4
COIR EROSION
CONTROL MATTING
/ LINE "A"
1 WILLIAM G. LINDSEY JR
/ DB 5367 PG 596
PB 63 PG 71
STREAM IMPACT N O. 3 PLAN
SCALE: 1 "=30'
N.C. GRID NORTH
NAD83(2011) NAVD88
NOTE: PROFILE VIEW NOT PROVIDED FOR STREAM IMPACT N0.3
(6" SERVICE LINE). EXISTING AERIAL SERVICE LINE WILL BE
REPLACED WITH BURIED SERVICE.
M
� I
U �
� Q
m
Q Z0
t'° O w z
o
F M
lJ U u
QJ < N -
V [-
0
�Q
LLuo
U w
O O Q N O
_ o
� � z
O �a
o Q
W•

Old Haw Creek Road @ Greenbriar Road Sanitary Sewer Replacement MSD Project No. 2012109  Project Location