20181625 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20181127

DWR
MOM— of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
tial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
G Yes r No
Oiange only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20181625
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Select Project Reviewer*
Chad Turlington:eads\octurlington
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Summerlin Subdivision Ph 2
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Mike Eaker, Southeastern Soil & Environmental
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
11/27/2018
Nearest Body of Water
Cypress Creek
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Version# *
1
Reviewing Office*
Fayetteville Regional Office - [phone]
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
Latitude: Longitude:
35.324881 -79.105900
FA. Processing Information U
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Harnett
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
* Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
rJ Nationwide Permit (NWP)
F- Regional General Permit (RGP)
F Standard (IP)

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
F Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
F Individual Permit
29 - Residential Developments
1e. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
r 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
r Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r- Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r- Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
O Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
F_ Owner W Applicant (other than owner)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
PRECISION CUSTOM HOMES AND RENOVATIONS
2b. Deed book and page no.:
3587:0455
2c. Responsible party:
Shaun Gardner
2d. Address
Street Address
256 BRIAR HILL RD
Address Line 2
CKY
RAEFORD
Postal / Zip Cade
28376
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Mike Eaker
State / Ffovinoe / Pagion
NC
Ceuntry
USA
2f. Fax Number:
r Yes r^ No
r- Yes r No

3b. Business Name:
Southeastern Soil & Environmental Associates
3c. Address
Street Address
PO Box 9321
Address Line 2
aty
Fayetteville
Postal / Zip Code
28311
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
Summerlin
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Sanford
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
9567-83-5120
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Navaho Trail
Address Line 2
Oty
Sanford
Postal / Zip Code
27332
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Cypress Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12 -digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300040203
4. Project Description and History
State / Ftwince / Region
NC
Country
USA
3e. Fax Number:
2b. Property size:
42
State / Ftwince / Region
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:
The site is currently forested (undeveloped). Land use in the vicinity is residential and forested.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
C Yes F No r^ Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Summerlin-USGS topo.pdf 432.71 KB
4e. Attach an 81/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Summerlin_Soil Map.pdf 629.7KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
9
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:

4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:"
Construct a single family residential subdivision
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
There is an eAsting dirt path with an epsting culvert at the proposed impact. The epsting 24" culvert will be removed and replaced with two 44.75 foot long 30" RCP at 4.11% and 5.23
slope. The path will be graded and paved to support the subdivision road (20ft wide traveled way and 6ft wide shoulders each side, 3:1 side slopes). A dissipater pad will be added at
the outlet end of the pipes. Typical construction equipment such as excavators, bulldozers, and pans will be used.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
1376 -IMPACT MAP -IMPACT MAP.pdf 323.1 KB
1376 Grading.pdf 1.33MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No f Unknown
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r NIA
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
5dl. Jurisdictional determination upload
Summerlin Wetland WDDF 1 of 2.pdf
Summerlin Wetland WDDF 2 of 2.pdf
Summerlin Site Pictures.pdf
Summerlin Wetlands.pdf
Summerlin_ Aerial Photo.pdf
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Southeastern Soil &Environmental
2g. Total Temporary
7.34MB
11.95MB
6.46MB
328.18KB
531.55KB
r Yes r No
7b. If yes, explain.
Phase 1 completed. This is phase 2
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
P Wetlands F Streams -tributaries
F Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
r Buffers
r
Reason M 2b. Impact type * (?) 2c. Type of W. * 2d. W. name * 2e. Forested* 2f. Type of 2g. Impact
Jurisdicition*M area*
W1 culvert replacement P Headwater Forest H Yes t
0.012
(acres)
W1 culvert replacement JT
Wetland Impact 2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.008 0.012
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.020
Headwater Forest
H
Yes
Both
0.008
(acres)
Wetland Impact 2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.008 0.012
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.020

2h. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Fleadwalls will be used instead of fill slopes to reduce pipe length. The purpose of this impact is to improve/maintain aquatic resources by replacing the
existing culvert with larger pipes and to add a dissipating device in order to manage anticipated water flows.
Lots were configured to ensure they could be developed without wetland impacts.
An existing road and wetland crossing were chosen for the subdivision road (Navaho Trail) to minimize impacts.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
construction limits will be fenced to prevent unauthorized activity in wetlands
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes
r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
permanent and temporary wetland impacts less than 1/10 acre
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
If no, explain why:
Cape Fear River Basin, HUC 03030004 not subject
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15ANCAC 2B.0200)?*
r Yes
r No
I Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes
r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This residential development is relatively small and will not likely affect regional growth patterns.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor N/A

4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated
at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
onsite subsurface sewage waste disposal
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat? *
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut anytrees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
Sh. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
r Unknown
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
US FWS iPaC (https://ecos.fws.gov/ipact). iPaC provided a list of federally protected species that may occur in the proposed project area and/or may
be affected by the proposed project. it included the Red -cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis), Cape Fear Shiner (Notropis mekistocholas),
Rough -leaved Loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia). No Critical Habitats were identified.
Consultation Documentation Upload
Species List_ Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office.pdf 186.15KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA Habitat Conservation National Marine Fisheries Service
https://wv,w.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhniapper/
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NC State Historic Preservation Office (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/)
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
Summerlin_SHPO Map.pdf 287.45KB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NC Flood Risk Information System https://fris.nc.gov/fris/Fbme.aspx?ST=NC
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Summerlin_NFIP Map.pdf 369.43KB

Signature
m By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
. I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
. I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Mike Eaker
Signature
Sign
Date
11/27/2018
v

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION'
I. the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S- Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property therein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
Shu 4f, 6d rJw
Property Owner (please print) Date
rj
r
Property Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
911�7lit
I am requesting that the Corps provide a prelizninarX JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WoUS' and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an approved oved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
® I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property/project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
° For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E
5 Waters of the United states
Version: Deceinber 2013 Page 4

315 316
305
•
287 306
a
4z* 2165" *284 436
239 260
AVA140i #2363
•
1 ;11Q, #
138 214
# r 17 • 43.9 k
1 � �
10 80 *515 53 51
{ 63 * * 1 f'53 T'"27
' s , r o- `' p �' + • 132 668..
123
O'' 23 e►14+i . 579 555761,
13"1 * "[�56 - 688• . ?'.� 625 *"' 76 �
116 r - .118 1'r r * 9$ `� '
` • 85' lb 50 29595 `
� 645 � ' +
* 1}1 66t. •# 8 685
;. 78r • . 7 4; # 665"
`fit . +�' f * �/ 31 . 109
'. 842`
'Ag
85
` 882 i 7# 7.79'
°,+ d r 'd*► 862. •
X1034i. C
cool,12,x,' •
. .r,x805
1152• 1120 `1080,55
r .,
2r . "I � y 1'P.0 R # �• 46 7'51 '° 123
1200 1 118 -€. 953 s 6 66
1
`" �{ 1a45 ' ` "•. :phi r� 5��' 10
s
1172k.999

Northing: = 574,920, Easting = 1,966,681 Northing: = 574,920, Easting = 1,970,149
" Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
With BFE or Depth
" Regulatory Floodway
1.
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance
N a M Flood Hazard
Areas Determined to be Outside the
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Jurisdiction Boundary
FIRM Panel Boundary
North Carolina State Plane Projection Feet (Zone 3200)
r Datum: NAD 1983 (Horizontal), NAVD 1988 (Vertical)
1
1 inch = 500 feet 16000
0 125 250 500
o rf i Feet
i,'ryT' �' �• '� 0 25 50 100
` k NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
M FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
Panel(s):9566
3 ,r CONTAINS:
r r r V COMMUNITY CID
HARNETT COUNTY 370328
r'+�a r t* r� i Notice to User: The Map Number(s) shown
,. 'F` N below should be used when placing map
i F F �� , �, = orders; the Community Number(s) shown
above should be used on insurance
applications for the subject community.
SELECTED PANELS:
MAP NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE
`4h r w 4 3710956600J 10/3/2006
alp"
c6
1A
No
w `rte%
Northing: = 571,452, Easting = 1,966,681 9 Page 1 of 2 Northing: = 571,452, Easting = 1,970,149 w
This is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. This map incorporates changes or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the title block. For the latest
product information about National Flood Insurance Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www.msc.fema.gov.

FEMA: National Flood Insurance Program �4�r" r
Page 2 of 2 °s�,�qN�
Panel(s):9566
CONTAINS:
COMMUNITY CID
HARNETT COUNTY 370328
Notice to User: The Map Number(s) shown below should be
used when placing map orders; the Community Number(s)
shown above should be used on insurance applications for
the subject community.
SELECTED PANELS:
MAP NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE
3710956600J 10/3/2006
NOTES TO USERS
This is an official FIRMette of a portion of the effective panels
listed in the Title Block shown on Page 1. The information
represented on this FIRMette was extracted from the effective
digital flood hazard data available at http://fris.nc.gov/fris.
Base flood elevation data, floodway, nonencroachment widths,
information on certain areas no in the Special Flood Hazard
Areas protected by flood control structures, and other pertinent
data are available in the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) available at
http://fris.nc.gov/fris. Users should be aware that flood elevations
shown on this FIRMette represent elevations rounded to one
tenth of a foot (0.1') and should be utilized in conjunction with
data available in the FIS.
NOTES TO USERS
Base map information and geospatial data used to develop this FIRMette were obtained
from various organizations, including the participating local community(ies), state and
federal agencies, and/or other sources. The primary base for this FIRM is aerial imagery
acquired by the State in 2010. Information and geospatial data supplied by the local
community(ies) that met FEMA base map specifications were considered the preferred
source for development of the base map.
See geospatial metadata for the associated digital FIRMette for additional information
about base map preparation. Base map features shown on this FIRMette, such as
corporate limits, are based on the most up-to-date data available at the time of publication.
Changes in the corporate limits may have occurred since this map was published. Map
users should consult the appropriate community official or website to verify current
conditions of jurisdictional boundaries and base map features. This map may contain
roads that were not considered in the hydraulic analysis of streams where no new
hydraulic model was created during the production of this statewide format FIRM.
Flood elevations on this map are referenced to either or both the North American Vertical
Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88) or National Geodetic Datum of 1929 (NGVD 29), and are
labeled accordingly. These flood elevations must be compared to structure and ground
elevations referenced to the same vertical datum. To obtain current elevation, description,
and/or location information for bench marks shown on this map, or for information
regarding conversion between NGVD 29 and NAVD 88, please contact the Information
Services Branch of the National Geodetic Survey at [phone], or visit its website at
http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/.
MORE INFORMATION
Letters of Map Amendment (LOMA)
1-877-336-2627
hftp://msc.fema.gov/
Letters of Map Revision (LOMR)
919-715-5711
www.ncfloodma s.com
Flood Insurance Availability
North Carolina Division of Emergency
Management (NCDEM)
919-715-5711
htti)://www.nccrimecontrol.org/nfip
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)
1-877-638-6620
hftp://www.fema.gov/business/nfip
Questions about this FIRMette
1-877-336-2627
htti)://fema.gov

/ l
�
±
J�r® RLI
E�r
c®kL
cl\4
m1�aa.k% Vk
HAREV
� � \
V,
,
,
-P
7
t &��
2 +`� FITHit Hick >Hbw4ard
rL IL 1991
»
m%<o7y
44�
�
®ZY
<
� ��>

Soil Map—Harnett County, North Carolinao
3
3
o
671500 671600 671700 671800 671900
671000 672100 672200 677300
672400 672500 672600 672700
35° 19'40" N
35° 19' 40" N
�
M
rn
c3
o_
r
�
a
s
•�
S. rl a li i I
q:
Ai
Fi
35° WIT N
' b '�� '
35° 19'13" N
671500
671600 671700 671800 671900
672000 672100 672200 672300
672400 672500 672600 672700 672800
3
3
Map Scale: 1:6,000 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.En
o
Meters
m
N 0 50 100 200 300
Feet
0 250 500 1000
1500
Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge
tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
usDA
Natural Resources
Web Soil Survey
11/21/2018
lim
Conservation Service
National Cooperative Soil Survey
Page 1 of 3

MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
0
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
0
Soil Map Unit Polygons
rwr
Soil Map Unit Lines
0
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
Vo
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
.14
Gravelly Spot
0
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
+
Mine or Quarry
Water Features
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Streams and Canals
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
4
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Slide or Slip
oa
Sodic Spot
Soil Map—Harnett County, North Carolina
MAP INFORMATION
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 11/21/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3
Spoil Area
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Wet Spot
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
Other
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
.-
Special Line Features
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Transportation
Rails
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
rwr
Interstate Highways
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
US Routes
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
L
Major Roads
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Local Roads
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
Background
.
Aerial Photography
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Harnett County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 15, Sep 10, 2018
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jun 15, 2015—Dec 4,
2017
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 11/21/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3

Soil Map—Harnett County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
UT Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 11/21/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
BnB
BnD
Blaney loamy sand, 2 to 8
percent slopes
35.4
0.7
31.9%
0.6%
Blaney loamy sand, 8 to 15
percent slopes
CaB
Candor sand, 0 to 8 percent
slopes
38.3
34.5%
GaB
Gilead loamy sand, 2 to 8
percent slopes
36.7
33.1%
Totals for Area of Interest
111.0
100.0%
UT Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 11/21/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

OLIVIA QUADRANGLE
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NORTH CAROLINA
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 7.5 -MINUTE SERIES (2016)
SCALE 1:24 000
1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2
1000 500 0 METERS 1400 2000
1 0.5 0 1
hAi LES
1000 0 1004 2000 3000 4000 5DOID 6404 7400 8000 9000 14040
FEET
CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988

4 /
! _
n��� e /
x \ \.&a\� X22/�w \
+\
. Ila
� 2 \ �\® 2
®`q - ^'
.36
/Z X >�
SF3: �s & )
f9
\ 106 n x 2
%d�
a

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑�
Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑�
High Water Table (A2)
1❑ -f
U Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑�
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑
Water Marks (131)
iII
I --I Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (62)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (B3)
❑_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
II Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Q
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
0 Geomorphic Position (D2)
Q
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
II FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
a
Water -Stained Leaves (69)
0 Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
FAC species x 3 =
1
FACU species x 4 =
2
UPL species x 5 =
3.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
= Total Cover
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1,
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3•
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6•
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7,
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5•
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc'
Texture Remarks
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
E] Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
E] Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
U 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
1 Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
{D
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
f] Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
I
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
C]
Stratified Layers (A5)
E] Depleted Depleted Matrix (F3)
TUI
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1536)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Parent Material (TF2)
F]Muck
Presence (A8) (LRR U)
F-1Redox Depressions (F8)
uI Very Shallow Dark Surface (TIF 12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _E]
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
D✓
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
E1 Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C9 153D)
D✓
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑
Surface Water (Al) El Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
High Water Table (A2)
U Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑
Water Marks (131)
iII
I --I Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (62)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (B3)
❑_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Q
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Q
Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
II FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
a
Water -Stained Leaves (69)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
FAC species x 3 =
1
FACU species x 4 =
2
UPL species x 5 =
3.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
= Total Cover
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1,
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3•
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6•
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7,
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5•
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc'
Texture Remarks
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
E] Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
E] Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
U 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
1 Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
C]
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
f] Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
I
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
f—]
StratifiedLayers (A5)
E] Depleted Depleted Matrix (F3)
TUI
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1536)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Parent Material (TF2)
F]Muck
Presence (A8) (LRR U)
F-1Redox Depressions (F8)
uI Very Shallow Dark Surface (TIF 12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _E]
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
E1 Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C9 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

sI
ntal Ass ciate&,nc.
P.O. Sox 9321
Fayetteville, NC 28311
SOILISITE EVALUATION 9 SOIL PHYSICAL ANALYSIS e LAND USFISUBDIVISION PLANNING • WETLANDS
GROUNDWATER DRAINAGE/MOUNDING • SURFACE/SUBSURFACE WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS. EVALUATION & DESIGN

L
SITE
O
00 F
SR 1320�y9A A
NORTH
SITE NOTES
1. ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE IN REFERENCE TO THE BENCHMARK
AND MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR.
2. EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN FROM AS -BUILT
MAPS SUPPLIED BY HARNETT COUNTY AND SOME FIELD
LOCATIONS. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OR EXCAVATION OF THE
SITE, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE ALL UTILITY
COMPANIES TO VERIFY THE LOCATION OF THEIR RESPECTIVE
UTILITIES. ALL DAMAGE INCURRED TO EXISTING UTILITIES DURING
CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPAIRED AT THE GENERAL
CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.
3. ASPHALT AND BASE TYPE SHALL BE PER THE DETAILS.
4. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE EDGE OF FINISHED PAVEMENT
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
5. ALL WASTE MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE
WITH STATE AND LOCAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS.
6. ALL SITE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER HARNETT
COUNTY AND STATE REGULATIONS.
7. ALL EXISTING DRIVEWAY PIPES ARE TO BE REMOVED.
g^E 1825.02' TOTAL
I N/F
50% UNDIVIDED INTEREST TO KATHIE MARIE DELP
I LIVING TRUST U/A DATED DECEMBER 12, 2008 &
I 50% UNDIVIDED INTEREST TO RANDALL ERIC DELP
LIVING TRUST U/A DATED DECEMBER 12, 2008
5BB TRACT 2
I DB 2576, PG 771
I N/F PB 2000, PG 553
50% UNDIVIDED INTEREST TO KATHIE MARIE DELP I N82°15'18E 59597
LIVING TRUST U/A DATED DECEMBER 12, 2008 &
I 50% UNDIVIDED INTEREST TO RANDALL ERIC DELP
LIVING TRUST U/A DATED DECEMBER 12, 2008
TRACT 1
I DB 2576, PG 771
PB 2004, PG 828 EiR
I ♦ •
I ♦ 1
I 573.74' ! •
• 1
VICINITYMAP N82°133 265.79' / / , .•�♦ '■ ■ � ■ ■ � on. IV, ■
NOT TO SCALE _-----
♦
358.57'
_ / / •
000001-
■ • \ I o
■ \ \ \ / s ^�lLn
�I
■ \
\ I o
41
■ \ \ \ \ \ / /
■ I \ 4 44 as \ \ \ 51 / /
I 3\ \
■ \ \ 37,057 SF
\ \ \ \ \ (0.85 AC)
♦ \ \ \ 50,317 SF
(1.16 AC)
♦ \ \ / 36,573 SF
♦ ♦ \ \11� C12 / / � (0.84 AC) I
20'X10' I
UTILITY ESMT
53 15'X10'----"- 35R n
■ `
252,558 SF UTILITY ESMT
' (5.80 AC) I v
` ♦ N71� 2
♦ C/\ 0 35R o I
S v �
♦ 35R _)3
♦\ C-) \
15X10'
!� 54 UTILITY ESMT G \ 49 I
! 64,112 SF Gt \ \ 21,190 SF
(0.49 AC) I
'4
q3'W / 1 (1.47 AC) LO 5A
Q _/_ �Z� \
66g 57 ■ \ w- T) 6,� - - J
/ ` ■ / o N `°-\ \ 5'X10'
UTILITY ESMT
/ `C9 /
•W ' 55 25R
�/
•
'♦ i
i•
I ■
■
■
1
� 42 ♦
♦ • ■ ♦ 423,488 SF
�■ ■ mown ■ moo • •' ` + (9.72 AC) 0
• •
W w ��
• w
108.66 101.13' ■ ■ OWN*
S84°350211W N83°58'43" W I F - - - - A\
N83°58'43" W 154.08'
85.73' TOTAL
68.35' 17.29' _ __
85.25' S775g'43"
- E 240.00'
I I I i z ToTAL _
I I I r l L / 85.26 _
I I I I I Q I ' I s, I _- 52-20'
I I N I i r �4 00' \
N iO L6 ILd
^ ° I -7Z I I I ' I I I \\
90 04
I � r -
o N I ' ' ' \ ,6
Z 2s 6429 3p \
�� �o " w l
I I N M/
44 I I 43 I I I Z �' / �' / r \ \ 28� 69 To \
N I it Z N� Io
20,817 SF I I 20,849 SF I 41 / N
(0.48 AC) I I (0.48 AC) I t I I I 20,324 SF 40 I Z N�13, \
(0.47 AC) N LO N ; 4 \
_J I I ' / 21,072 SF 39 Z NI ' - / 1 / / -
0 4
15'X1' ' ' (0.48 AC) I v C / /I'-
\
UTILITY ESMT I 21,315 SF
7 - �C6 i I L _ I (0.49 AC) ' 38 / �o N \N25°30'28"E
- -�54.24'
C5 I ' 21315 SF �Z N�
MAIL KIOSK _ _ ' ' I (0.49 AC) 37
_ J /
_ _ 85. L I (0.49 C) / oo /�/ / 5/
1� - (0.49 AC) Qi ER
- 25 - /= N / /
_ I 5 _I 85.26' L / /
571 35 ` 76,204 SF 25R - - - - - C32 - - 8' 2s1 _ _ _ - _ J 22,922 SF /
_ C31 50' R NAVAN0 8 L _ _ (0.53 AC) /
♦. // (1.75 AC) �/ /W (pNBLIC & TRA1� N77°Sg'43. x'26= _ / / / „M
146 18 G30 \ _ - _ - ♦ ■ N775 UTILITY ACCESS) -� 518.70' T0- _ _ _ 85 26 _ J L
■ 4g W �, 0 3p N - - - _ - - -1 - _ _ I 210.92 �8�43"�y 31 10'X10' / / 24,157 SF /05
■ 57�°12„a / / o ° 43,W 13 l 4_91' _ ��UTILITY ESMT
� TOTAL 8 J (0.55 AC) o
SC. / � I '� ■ _ _ � _ __ % _ _ _ 5.26 , _
\ / / / \ �\ I L ��_ _ �� 37.5p'
25R rn 0 48 I o , I ♦ ° N ■ _ 15'X10' 5/8„ \ \/
`L 25R �V \ i9 00� 21,377 SF I � 00 I CD N d UTILITY ESMT ERB 5/8„ N77° o 17
\ 66 \ o\ (0.49 AC) I (0.46 AC) I `� _ _ ERB 58'43"W 203-80' Rcp w2 '02 N/F
rri I / 178.10' 0 TOTAL \ CALVIN L. BREWER, JR. & WI
\ \ 23,153 SF \ I I ■ ■ 46 ' \iceJAMIE LYNNE BREWER
\Z \ (0.53 AC) \ \ I 25.70 5/a ERB DB 3546, PG 552
43,668 SF\ \ I I ♦ ♦ (1.00 AC) I / 5/ ` PB 2010, PG 411 S3
ERB
• �
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
LENGTH
RADIUS
BEARING
CHORD
C2
85.26
374.99
N64°10'08"W
85.08
C3
47.76
374.90
N74°19'49"W
47.73
C5
25.09
625.00
N79°07'44"W
25.09
C6
85.07
625.00
N84°10'41"W
85.00
C7
80.05
625.00
S88°15'12"W
80.00
C8
130.08
625.00
S78°37'17"W
129.85
C9
38.64
25.00
S63°03'52"E
34.91
C10
27.55
35.00
S03°45'41 "W
26.84
C11
74.37
50.00
N16°18'02"W
67.70
C12
40.00
50.00
N81°49'49"W
38.94
C13
41.00
50.00
S51 °45'30"W
39.86
C14
40.00
50.00
S05°20'49"W
38.94
C15
40.42
50.00
S40°43'46"E
39.33
C16
27.55
35.00
N41°20'16"W
26.84
C17
39.27
25.00
N26°12'43"E
35.36
C29
38.40
25.00
S27°12'43"W
34.73
C30
35.66
575.00
N72°59'18"E
35.65
C31
135.18
575.00
N81 °30'00"E
134.87
C32
138.36
575.00
S84°52'19"E
138.02
\�: i I / ■ ` I l
ERBr `50.
\� \ \ I ■ ♦♦ ' / - R=325.00' / ERB
r� L=35.90'
\ 3.12 43 J 3'E 105 54 CHORD / 5/8"
\N_ �N1 is \ N73°124 �Z 2 3 NN74°48'54"W ERB `
PRECISIOI 35.88'
5 Op SEE SN o co HOMES & RENOVATIONS, LLC / `SO• �-9 5/
43 E 8 ` N coI / DB 3499, PG 319 / A y0 ER
312 \N� 45 / d \ PB 2010, PG 411 G %
Oo
N7 N ♦ � N � 5/8° � ��
P ' 28,108 SF / ERB
LEGEND: s'A8° ` (0.65 AC)
E R \ /
OO EIP-EXISTING IRON PIPE EEI SIGN 26� ♦♦ / 26 i
EPKEPK-EXISTING PK ®MAILBOX MAILBOX 6F ♦ `
ERRGB O ERB-EXISTING REBAR no HVAC UNIT 2IF ♦ I / r� 28 / PRECISION 'CUSTOM / ERB
ERsO ERS -EXISTING RAILROAD SPIKE m TRANSFORMER R�• / \ HOMES & RENOVATIONS, LLC
CP -COMPUTED POINT 0 LIGHT POLE ♦ N/F / DB 3499, PG 319 r\ 18
N/F NOW OR FORMERLY PP• UTILITY POLE ♦ � � PRECISION CUSTOM PB 2010, PG 411
R/W - RIGHT OF WAY C• GUY WIRE HOMESDB 3499PGRENOVATIONS, LLC N /F
PRECISION CUSTOM
PVC -POLYVINYL CHLORIDE ❑T TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ■ PB 2010, PG 411 HOMES & RENOVATIONS, LLC
RCP - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE © '
CABLE PEDESTAL ■ R=325.00' / DB 3499, PG 319
.
L=7761PB 2010, PG 411
PROPERTY LINE X WATER VALVE // CHORD
ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE �FIRE HYDRANT \ / ERe N64°48'35"W
TIE LINE LTJ WATER METER \ / 77.43' /
RIGHT-OF-WAY ® CATCH BASIN
-SETBACK LINE E) TREE
ss SANITARY SEWER LINE ASPHALT
SD STORM DRAINAGE SOIL 8S� rO r' 29 �1 \
w WATER LINE WATER S A
OVERHEAD UTILITY OWETLANDS M° PRECISIONFCUSTOM GRAPHIC SCALE
WETLANDS 14 HOMES & RENOVATIONS, LLC 50 0 25 50 100 200
PERMANENT EASEMENT DB 3499, PG 319
X FENCE LINE NS
PB 2010, PG 411
+� 100 YEAR FLOOD LINE
TREE LINE ( IN FEET )
1 inch = 50 ft.
0
vsite
solutions
ng
I Land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1910-426-6777 fax [phone] license number I C-2354
www.4Dsitesotutions.com
REVISIONS
z
O
Cf)
w
a0_
Q
J W_
W
Z�
O
PROJECT NAME
SUMMERLIN
SUBDIVISION
PHASE II
DETAILED
SITE PLAN
CLIENT
SHAUN GARDNER
256 Briar Hill Road
Raeford, North Carolina 28376
Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY:
SEAN
DRAWN BY:
SEAN
CHECKED BY:
SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER:
1376
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=50'
DATE RELEASED
SEPTEMBER 19, 2018
SHEET NUMBER
C-2.1

�-7 O"o F i
Sp 1320 �y9 �j� 225 43'W �♦
o oA S1 -1
F I Gpx t 66g 5
♦
NORTH A ♦ ♦ "
VICINITY MAP ' '%3'w � � ♦
X112 ■ ♦
NOT TO SCALE '
`� ♦ ZM
■ ♦ .i.' \ SNE
\ � �3 v� � ■ ♦ SE p, �\
S�1°12 13 ■ \ `` GN\N� A3,� 19� \ t�3 1p5 5q ■
�8• \ � � � p� ■ � � \ M P� N�312� � � N1312 43'E ■
\ ' ' • \ �` ----1 X10' \ �3'E S5 gip'
\ \/ / ■ ` 56 \`` UTILITY ESMT g5 \ N13°12 ♦ 7j
■ ♦ 72,581 SF ` 4
\ • (1.67 AC) \\ \ 20,001 SF \ o \ ♦ _ • ■
(0.46 AC)Cyt 6, \ ■ \
�S/0 \ • \ \ \ \ 22,910 SF
0 '' 0.53 AC
\ �� \ ■ 5'X10' r f I 3°12 �3 \ / \ �,•�.
\ SsA \ ■ UTILITY ESMT�� \ m Os 6''\ tK
�°`
RS' \ • • `� z (!G \ 64 \ oA 22,437 SF
r \ (0.52 AC)
20
,001 SF \ \ \ ■
a 6 ••
\ �3°12 • \ n (0.46 AC) \
\ S 325.13 ♦ p. 'oc, \ \ 35R \S6SS.
LO
21
\ / 35R V� i \
N/F \ v
3
JOHN C. CHRISTIAN \ n \ P111 LO \ / ♦ ■
NO DEED FOUND N` N \ N ✓ /� $555 35R �� ■ /
\ tr ` 15'X10'10
\ ■ • 57 \ o ` UTILITY ESMT
\ `
59,611
10'X10' \ 4i ` ■/
\ ' • (1..37AC) \ ` UTILITY ESMT 63 Gni 'I„i11/i / �♦ ■
\ \ ■ • \ \ \ 24,241 SF
\ \ (0.56 AC) 5/8'\
/ ERB
\ • ♦ \ ` ` \ / 1 � O \ / / 34,224 SF
\ ,1, �s \ ■ W / G�/ O J ��G
15'X10'_ (0.79 AC) i
/
gyp, sr• ` ` 1� LQ
110000'
UTILITY ESMT
\ : ♦ 15'X10' \ \ �, 5� �\ S�� g 63
\ \ ` UTILITY ESMT��
\` •� ✓ pyo /� / / \ S62 f
• - A, tK N/ERB
\ 30 ,
LEGEND:\ ` 4 C t' PRECISION CUSTOM
EIP 00 EIP-EXISTING IRON PIPE sc" 20SIGN ♦ \ X28 / HOMES & RENOVATIONS, LLC
RK ♦ \ / $ \ DB 3499, PG 319
O EPK-EXISTING PK NAIL MB MAILBOX ♦ \ ®` / �� �� / 59 / 5� 69 Mpg$ PB 2010, PG 411
ERGO ERB-EXISTING REBAR nc HVAC UNIT \ `` G
ERs23,421 SF /
00 ERS -EXISTING RAILROAD SPIKE m TRANSFORMER \ ♦ l► ���� N / \
CP -COMPUTED POINT LIGHT POLE ♦ \ ` \ \5R s (0.54 AC)
PP5/8o / / / \
N/F -NOW OR FORMERLY •UTILITY POLE ' \ � / ERB
R/W - RIGHT OF WAY C• GUY WIRE \ • \ / /
PVC - POLYVINYL CHLORIDE MTELEPHONE PEDESTAL ■ \ CI
25R
RCP - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE ©CABLE PEDESTAL N` towv
PROPERTY LINE N WATER VALVE 58 \ �� < / 1�
ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE C FIRE HYDRANT \ ♦ \ \ / � ��� 31,;
TIE LINE IN WATER METER • �0'893AC) \ ����� N/F
RIGHT-OF-WAY INWATER
BASIN \ \ \ ` \ S81'01622 iW ,l,Rss,99 \� PRECISION CUSTOM
-SETBACK LINE TREE \ •\S HOME DB 34990 PGTION9 , LLC
ss SANITARY SEWER LINE \ ASPHALT \ \ �j, �� •As, •�` PB 2010, PG 411
SD STORM DRAINAGE \ SOIL \ u3,o0�S
A• ERB
w WATER LINE \WATER \ \��•. S 5/8"
OVERHEAD UTILITY \ WETLANDS \ \ \�
WETLANDS \ \
PERMANENT EASEMENTsG� \
X FENCE LINE �--.
\ 3 ♦ \ /, ♦ s� o �'Q 5/8" TBM
+��� 100 YEAR FLOOD LINE
TREE LINE N/F�� p"5 \ �� ti #
\ / 1`L � � G� ERB 4D PK NAIL 1
\ TAMMY L. DOUGLAS \ : \ / �tx`O ` p��/ N 572,400.590
E 1,968,279.908
DB 1912, PG 129 \ �`� ■/ 5� �__� ELEV 330.27
\ PB 2003, PG 315 \ 34 \ NC GRID NAD 83
\ (2011)
\ \ N/F �� ./ NAVD 88
SITE NOTES \ 5/8.. PRECISION CUSTOM
\ \ ERB HOMES & RENOVATIONS, LLC
1. ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE IN REFERENCE TO THE BENCHMARK DB 3499, PG 319
AND MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. �__�` \ \ PB 2010, PG 411 5/8"
2. EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN FROM AS -BUILT \ \ 2 I/ ERB
MAPS SUPPLIED BY HARNETT COUNTY AND SOME FIELD - \ \ /
LOCATIONS. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OR EXCAVATION OF THE \ \ N/F /
SITE, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE ALL UTILITY TAMMY L. DOUGLAS \ \
COMPANIES TO VERIFY THE LOCATION OF THEIR RESPECTIVE \\ DB 56 385 \ \
UTILITIES. ALL DAMAGE INCURRED TO EXISTING UTILITIES DURING PB 20, PG /
CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPAIRED AT THE GENERAL
CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.
3. ASPHALT AND BASE TYPE SHALL BE PER THE DETAILS.
4. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE EDGE OF FINISHED PAVEMENT \ \ \ /
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EIP
5. ALL WASTE MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE / \\ 5/8„ /
WITH STATE AND LOCAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS. \ \ ERB
6. ALL SITE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER HARNETT
COUNTY AND STATE REGULATIONS.
7. ALL EXISTING DRIVEWAY PIPES ARE TO BE REMOVED. \
\ \ N/F
\ MARK C. EAKES &WIFE, \
JANET K. EAKES
\ DB 2477, PG 839 \
PR I)nnz orr �l r
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
LENGTH
RADIUS
BEARING
CHORD
C18
40.14
25.00
N62°47'17"W
35.97
C19
126.54
255.00
S31 °00'17"E
125.25
C20
39.27
25.00
S00°13'11 "E
35.36
C21
147.39
475.00
S53°40'16"W
146.79
C22
16.40
35.00
S75°59'04"W
16.25
C23
120.29
50.00
N20°29'08"E
93.31
C24
111.44
50.00
S67°42'46"W
89.76
C25
35.86
35.00
N33°12'42"E
34.31
C26
39.91
525.00
S60°22'58"W
39.90
C27
122.99
525.00
S51 °29'37"W
122.71
C28
51.67
25.00
S76°00'11 "E
42.95
-2
N/F ,
\ PRECISION CUSTOM ,
HOMES & RENOVATIONS, LLC
\ DB 3499, PG 319
PB 2010, PG 411
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100 200
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 50 ft.
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering I land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1910-426-6777 fax [phone] license number I C-2354
www.4Dsitesotutions.com
REVISIONS
z
O
Cf)
w
aD_
Q
J W_
W
Ir
Z oc
LL O
PROJECT NAME
SUMMERLIN
SUBDIVISION
PHASE II
DETAILED
SITE PLAN
CLIENT
SHAUN GARDNER
256 Briar Hill Road
Raeford, North Carolina 28376
Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY:
SEAN
DRAWN BY:
SEAN
CHECKED BY:
SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER:
1376
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=50'
DATE RELEASED
SEPTEMBER 19, 2018
SHEET NUMBER
C-2.2

SITE
4y
...�jricwr M
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE NC GRID NAD 86 (20H)
LEGEND:
R/W - RIGHT OF WAY
INV - INVERT OF NEW PIPE
RCP - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
PROPERTY LINE
— CREEK
WETLANDS
WETLANDS
=PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
=TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA: 369FT2
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA: 806FT2 / 69LF
PRELIMINARY
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
REMOVE EXISTING 24" 1 1A
CULVERT AND REPLACE WITH
TWO 30" RCP
44.75
50' DRAINAGE EASEMENT LF ® 4.11% 30" RCP
'INV 281.16
/4.75 LF ® 5.23% 30" RCP
290
285
280
275
1
EIS
I
INV 283.00
I' INV 283.50
0+00
1+00
290
285
280
275
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 40
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
I4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Sui. 112, Faye0evie, NC 26306
.Nice 1910-426-6777 fax [phone] Genre number I C-2264
—AD.ft-M.m.c.m
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
SUMMERLIN
SUBDIVISION
PHASE II
STREAM
IMPACT MAP
CLIENT
SHAUN GARDNER
256 Briar Hill Road
Raeford, North Carolina 28376
Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY: CHRIS
DRAWN BY:
JIMMY
CHECKED BY:
SEAN
PROJECT NUMBER:
1376
44.75 LF ® 5.23%
30" RCP
INV 283.50
/
I
INV 283.00
INV 281.16
44.75 LF ® 4.11% 30" RCP
rl
N O
NO
00
N
N
00
00CN
0+00
1+00
290
285
280
275
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 40
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
I4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Sui. 112, Faye0evie, NC 26306
.Nice 1910-426-6777 fax [phone] Genre number I C-2264
—AD.ft-M.m.c.m
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
SUMMERLIN
SUBDIVISION
PHASE II
STREAM
IMPACT MAP
CLIENT
SHAUN GARDNER
256 Briar Hill Road
Raeford, North Carolina 28376
Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY: CHRIS
DRAWN BY:
JIMMY
CHECKED BY:
SEAN
PROJECT NUMBER:
1376
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1"=40'
VERTICAL: 1"=4'
DATE RELEASED
SEPTEMBER 24, 2018
SHEET NUMBER
W-1
OF

h FYSJilcVJ)urr.
-" United States Department of the Interior ,�x"
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
%$ Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
'a��,e Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To: November 02, 2018
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2019-SLI-0114
Event Code: 04EN2000-2019-E-00251
Project Name: Summerlin SD
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 etseq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

11/02/2018 Event Code: 04EN2000-2019-E-00251 2
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws. og v/mi rgratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/
comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].

11/02/2018 Event Code: 04EN2000-2019-E-00251
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List

11/02/2018 Event Code: 04EN2000-2019-E-00251
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

11/02/2018 Event Code: 04EN2000-2019-E-00251 2
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2019-SLI-0114
Event Code: 04EN2000-2019-E-00251
Project Name: Summerlin SD
Project Type: DEVELOPMENT
Project Description: Residential SD, Navaho Tr
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: ht s:
www.google.com/maps/place/35.32474586605262N79.10650427593794W
Counties: Harnett, NC

11/02/2018
Event Code: 04EN2000-2019-E-00251
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 3 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesl, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Birds
NAME
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws. oe v/ecp/species/7614
Fishes
NAME
Cape Fear Shiner Notropis mekistocholas
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Species profile: htips:Hecos.fws. og v/ecp/species/6063
Flowering Plants
NAME
Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: hiips:Hecos.fws. og v/ecp/species/2747
STATUS
Endangered
STATUS
Endangered
STATUS
Endangered

11/02/2018 Event Code: 04EN2000-2019-E-00251
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.