20070228 Ver 2_401 Application_20090709

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Paul D. Smith, PE
J. Michael Stocks, PE
3344 Hillsborough St., Suite 250 P.O. Box 1108
Raleigh, NC 27607 Nashville, NC 27856
919.821.2440 (0) ExjP 0'7 - O Z'13 8 V 01 252.459.8196 (0)
919.880.5886 (C) 252.903.6891 (C)
To: Lia Gilleski
NCDENR DWQ 401 Oversite
Express Coordinator
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone] Overnight N.
Yes
We are 'sending you the following:
Job No. 2006-056
Job Name: Middlesex Corporate Center Infra.
Middlesex, NC

Date: July 16, 2009

Sent By. Paul D. Smith, PE
? EC Plans Prints/Plans ? Construction Plat ? Site Plan Drawings ? Computer Disk
? Contracts x Permit Applications ? Site Work Calculations ?
These are transmitted as checked below:
? For Approval ? As Discussed
For Review and Comment
? For Your File ? As Requested
? For Your Signature, then return to:
Copies Date Description
3 Revised plans (per Request for More Information dated July 1, 2009)
1 $1,000 Additional Fee
1 Revised PCNL('O'SI

1 DE NR - VNkTFCS GLiALITY
tVEETLk'O-zz A%1f) v ?llr'?`ki,;r eQ
Revised Impact Maps
1 NCEEP In-Lieu Fee Request Form - Valerie Mitchener said that she would
expedite the letter immediate) after the meeting on Monday, Jul 20, 2009.

Remarks: Please call me at (919 821-2440 or Kevin Varnell Stocks Engineering [phone] if you have any
questions. Thanks for your attention to this project
? For Your Use
Copies T
v °
rtc?pGv
q?oF V 4A
r
C1 Y
F-Kn 0'7 - a D. Z% U .2-
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
.DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information &PAID
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? E Yes ? No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
401 Water Quality Certification - Express Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. 0 Yes ? No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Middlesex Corporate Center Infrastructure Project
2b. County: Nash
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Middlesex Oil
2d. Subdivision name: Middlesex Corporate Center ica+
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
DEN
3. Owner Information -'?.'ZSAND is xs+. ,`RR2R??C
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Nash County
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 2402/997, 2406/791, 2236/222, 2236/219, 2402/307, 2409/881, 23661358, 2381/968
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): Nash County
3d. Street address: 120 West Washington Street
3e. City, state, zip: Nashville, NC 27856
3f. Telephone no.: 252.459.9800
3g. Fax no.: 252.459.1381
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

y
?.? ca.
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Paul Smith, PE
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Stocks Engineering PA
5c. Street address: 3344 Hillsborough Street
5d. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27607
5e. Telephone no.: 919.821.2440
5f. Fax no.: 919.821.2210
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): See Attached
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.79251-ongitude: - 78.192778
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 198.78 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Turkey Creek (+/- 0.6 miles away)
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: QNSW
2c. River basin: Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is currently undeveloped fields and wooded areas comprised primarily of successional areas resulting from past
timber cutting along with mixed pine/hardwood forest. The land use surrounding the site consists of sparse residential
and agriculture.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
The property boundary consists of one large parcel and the ROW of the proposed road. A wetland delineation has been
completed for the portion of the land occurring within the proposed ROW only and the approximate wetland locations are
shown on the wetland map following this permit. However there are an estimated 2 acres of wetlands within the property
boundaries.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
The property boundary consists of one large parcel and the ROW of the proposed road. Two unnamed streams traverse
through the property for an estimated length of 2,500'- 3,000'.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of this project is to construct Phase I which will be an adequate paved entrance on both ends of the
alignment with a 10' wide gravel sales road traversing throughout the property within the proposed ROW. This will allow
the owner to properly market the interior commercial properties. Phase II will provide an adequate entrance road that will
provide safe and efficient access to the usable land within the parcel. The final roadway will be constructed as the lots
develop. No additional wetland, stream or buffer impacts are anticipated to occur after construction of the entrance road.
However, if further wetlands or streams are impacted during the development of the subdivision, an Individual
404/401 Permit will be required prior to impacting any jurisdictional wetlands or streams. Additional riparian buffer
impacts, if deemed necessary, may be authorized through "normal" riparian buffer permitting protocol. Obtaining the
potential Individual Permits will be the responsibility of the end user acquiring said parcel.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
This project is to construct the proposed road that will potentially serve the Middlesex Corporate Park. The footprints of
these facilities are not currently known but are not expected to impact any jurisdictional features. The jurisdictional
impacts associated with this project are the result of constructing an adequate entrance road to access the usable land on
the site. Typical construction equipment will be utilized through the construction of this project including; bulldozers,
scrapers, excavators, dump trucks, vibratory rollers, etc.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property
/
project (including all prior phases) in the past? Yes ? No ? Unknown
Comments: Delineation and USACE review conducted for
portion of property within proposed ROW only.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Environmental Services,
Name (if known): Jeff Harbour and Gail Tyner of ESI Inc. (ESI)
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
DWQ onsite determination on February 20, 2007. Thomas Brown with USACE conducted the site visit in February 2007
and reviewed the delineated features occurring within the proposed ROW. Additional property near Highway 231 was
also reviewed by Thomas Brown during a separate site visit on November 15, 2007.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for M Yes ? No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
USACE 404 Permit received June 29, 2009.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? M Yes ? No
6b. If yes, explain.
USACE and DWQ may choose to consider this a partially phased project with respect to future needs on the property for
stormwater management pursuant to Section 401 requirements. This current application addresses the need and
impacts resulting from the proposed Phase I. The site will ultimately be developed as a commercial tract. It is intended
for each commercial site to address all necessary stormwater needs on the individual lots as they develop. However,
until final design plans for these separate facilities are available, the details of the BMPs for stormwater management
cannot be adequately discussed and any submitted information regarding this would be speculative at this time. The
applicant is proposing that any lot that is greater than 24% impervious, develop stormwater management plans and
submit for review. These current end users have not yet been identified and the development of the remaining parcels
may not occur until the economy turns and the properties can be marketed with reasonable expectations. It is reasonable
to anticipate a development of this nature could take 15 years to complete. All Section 404 requirements will have been
satisfied through this current application. It is not anticipated that any further Section 404 approvals for wetlands or
stream impacts will be required by this future development. If further impacts are necessary for the development, an
Individual Permit will be required for any jurisdictional impacts. Obtaining the potential Individual Permits will be the
responsibility of the end user acquiring said parcel.
Page 4 of 12
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
0 Wetlands N Streams - tributaries Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 M P ? T Fill / Crossing herbaceous ? Yes
0 No Corps
DWQ 0.17
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W3 ? PEI T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? PEI T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.17
2h. Comments: Mitigation is required by ACOE at a ratio of 2:1
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - PER or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent
(P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ? P N T Temporary Unnamed Trib to PER ? Corps 8 10
Disturbance Turkey Creek ? INT 0 DWQ
S2 E P ? T Crossing/Fill Unnamed Trib to 0 PER ?Corps 8 92
Turkey Creek ? INT DWQ
S3 ? PET Temporary Unnamed Trib to PER ? Corps 6 10
Disturbance Turkey Creek ? INT DWQ
S4 EP ? T Crossing/Fill Unnamed Trib to PER ? Corps 6 180
Turkey Creek ? INT DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? PEI T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 292
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individual) list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
0. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. 0 Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason for Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or impact Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary T required?
B1 P ? T Crossing/ Unnamed Trib to Turkey 0 Yes
6
780
4
927
Fill Creek ? No , ,
B2 P ? T Crossing/ Unnamed Trib to Turkey 0 Yes
10
779
6
311
Fill Creek ? No , ,
133 ?P?T
J
?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts 17,559 11,238
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 12
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Throughout the planning process two roadway alignments were considered. The criteria for choosing the final alignment were
based on NCDOT criteria, environmental impacts, and property impacts. Alignment Option 1 met all NCDOT criteria, had
minimal property impacts, but had several environmental impacts, including stream impacts that exceed the compensatory
mitigation threshold. The impacts associated with Alignment 1 were 0.92 acres of buffered pond impacts, 620 linear feet of
buffered stream impacts, as well as 0.17 acres of wetland impact. Riparian buffer impacts associated with Option 1 included
24,000 square feet of impact to Zone 1 and 15,000 square feet of impact to Zone 2. These impacts, upon further review,
were reduced through redesign of the alignment and the elimination of one leg of the proposed roadway system that would
have provided a second connection to US 264 Alternate, but would have also incurred additional wetland impacts.
The final alignment (preferred alternative) chosen requires 292 LF of stream impact {a reduction of 328 ft) and a 0.17 acre
wetland impact {a reduction of 0.75 ac). Riparian buffer impacts have also been reduced to 17,559 square feet of impact to
Zone 1 and 11,238 square feet of impact to Zone 2. After diligent study and research, it was believed that there were no
further alternatives to utilize this property and further reduce impacts.
It has also been noted by ACOE and verified through research at NCNHP that there is a potential for an endangered species
population in Turkey Creek. The dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon) has been identified in Turkey Creek; less than
1 mile from the project site. NCNHP records contain eight element occurrences of dwarf wedgemussel in this section of
Turkey Creek from 1996 (see attached map). Although, this project does not directly discharge to Turkey Creek, the runoff
from the site ultimately drains to it due to the natural topography of the area. In an effort to avoid impacts to the potential
endangered species, phase one of this project, which involves the construction of the road, will utilize level spreaders and
plunge pools to provide diffuse flow to the adjacent unnamed tributaries. No direct discharge of stormwater to any stream will
occur. Any site that has over 24% impervious along this corridor will be required to provide BMPs which have 85% TSS
removal, which will therefore help protect the water quality and the various species that depend on this resource. Impacts to
aquatic ecosystems can be dramatically reduced or eliminated during all phases of road construction if the proper BMPs are
installed and effectively maintained. In those areas associated with aquatic endangered species habitat, all road maintenance
and construction activities should follow all applicable BMPs to eliminate sedimentation occurring downstream. Sediment and
erosion control measures will be implemented for all construction activities.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
All applicable Sediment and Erosion Control BMP's will be employed during construction of the proposed roadway to
prevent indirect impacts to nearby streams.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for Yes ? No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): DWQ Corps
Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this Payment to in-lieu fee program
project?
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: See Attached Letter
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type See Attached Quantity See Attached
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 292 LF
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: 0 warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 17,579 SF (Zone 1) and 11,238 (Zone 2)
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? E Yes ? No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 Crossing / Fill 17,579 3 (2 for Catawba) 52,737
Zone 2 Crossing / Fill 11,238 1.5 16,857
6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 69,594
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
Payment will be made to NCEEP.
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 12
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified Yes ? No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 20.48%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? Yes ? No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The current proposed roadway will provide diffuse flow from any concentrated runoff. Once the applicant identifies end
users of the commercial tracts, the users will be responsible for submittal and approval of formal stormwater management
plans to DWQ.
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties

4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? HQW
? ORW
(check all that apply):
? Session Law 2006-246
0 Other: Section 401
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? Yes ? No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ® No
Comments: This project is a Categorical Exclusion
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ® Yes ? No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The current proposed roadway will provide diffuse flow from any concentrated runoff. Once the applicant identifies end
users of the commercial tracts, the users will be responsible for submittal and approval of formal stormwater management
plans to Nash County and/or Middlesex.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sewer service will be provided by the Town of Middlesex when needed.
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
El Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
ESI biologists conducted a database search and a habitat assessment while onsite and determined that the project area
does not contain any federally protected species. However, dwarf edgemussel was identified in Turkey Creek (<1 mile
away) in 1996. The Dwarf Wedge Mussel Recovery Plan (USFWS 1993) identifies the status of the dwarf wedgemuseel
population in Turkey Creek as good with reproduction of the mussels evident. Siltation generated by road construction is
considered a major factor in the decline of many freshwater mussel species. The proposed project incorporates BMPs to
control the runoff, including sediment, generated from the road construction and has measures designed to eliminate
concentrated flow from leaving the site. These practices are a combination of state required management practices
pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act plus additional BMPs suggested by USFWS and NCWRC that are
intended to reduce or eliminate any detrimental effects on downstream receiving waters. The proposed roadway is
expected to have a negligible effect on Turkey Creek and the aquatic species therein.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
hftp://ocean.floridamarine.org/efh_coral/ims/viewer.htm and also the EFH Waterbody Index provided by NMFS
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
On 13 March 2009, Environmental Services, Inc., (ESI) conducted research at the Survey and Planning Branch (SPB)
and the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) of the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (NC SHPO). No
specific items of concern were identified as a result of this preliminary study. The proposed project should be in
compliance with Section 106 of the Historic Preservation Act.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? www.ncfloodmaps.com
Paul Smith, PE _ .7 ? /Z
t
i

Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applica
t/A ignature Date
_(Agent's signature is valid only i an authorization letter from the applicant
Page 11 of 12
I I is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
°^ u L 3SVHd - Nd'7d 311S 77V213A0
«izfd3?.? m-ma9?u?w Q
LO3rOHd32Ui O M1S1 AIU310031VWOdYOOX3S370(I1N •d-d '9NI2133NI9N3 S-NZ)O1Sv
8
S
?„ m a
1 ........ .........................
.
............
..
.... _ ........
Z
?e
r

f
f

i - ? < 9 ? FpO
10
% ? ?, I F 8
...... _. 2...g
_ _ W< m
hg ?
C r^ o
S? ?r
fl

k

f
? O
Z
U ?
W F
N 2
g J
4
/ CREEK
l ?? r
I s r CENTERLIN Ifj .. y
? 3 3 { ? }3 4? ft[ 7 S
I I I SEGN ENTAL
i [ RETAINING'/
STREAM` W LL
i( FLOW • z
I ER?/ HANNEL
i PERM!. CHANNEL . .~? IMPACT]
IM ](PACT j SSI f / ,
T°EMR. CHANN L
t ,IMPACTS / 9 r
1 i f ?? r? .,? ( I f
I
?EdMENfAl
r :RETAiII?VC
6l/
t p ,t p E j/ F JJ,/
t 3` j r /?f f U6LE ! ff
k/ STR
f
56 U
`TdB' BIEG t
2QN"Ef 11
# ` 3 (BUFFER f'.",4} 3 j f £ 5 \ s
ONE 150WER;1LIMI '
' ZONE 2 BPFFER'LIMIT
• € I 6 ti N i
i 1
MPORTANT/PERENNIAL STREAM
® ZONE 1 IMPACT 6.780 SF
ZONE 2 IMPACT 4.927 SF
TEMPORARY CHANNEL LINEAR IMPACT = 10 LF
TEMPORARY CHANNEL AREA IMPACT = 80 SF
PERMANENT CHANNEL LINEAR IMPACT = 92 LF
PERMANENT CHANNEL AREA IMPACT = 736 SF
i
SCALE: 1 50'
0 50 100 125 150
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A. MIDDLESEX CORPORATE CENTER
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT
3314 HILLSBOROUGH ST. PHONE [phone] EASTERN AVENUE PHONE [phone] NASH COUNU, NC C-01A
MITE 250 FAX: [phone] NASHVILLE. N.C. 27858 FAX [phone]
RALEIGH, N.C. 27807 CROSSING #1- DETAILED SITE PLAN
07/16/09
220
210
200
190
220
210
200
190
32+00 34+00 36+00 38+00
1 CROSSING #1 PROFILE
tOSCALE: HORIZ.: 1"=100'
VERT.: 1"=10'
RD.
POINT RETAINING
WALL
MIN-L 1 4
I °11n1r r 1=1n=111=1111 i=ill=lil i INV. IN ON ONE 72" RCP
1VIEW
SEGMENTAL -III=III-111 -nl=1I=111-1 -r?-i?-lil-L11=1i- SHALL BE 1' HIGHER THAN
11=?L=7=' C -III=I 1-III-I - T Tj=IL=III=III-I
?I -lll- =1I
RETAINING=11=1?=?=1?-
WALL _rr11T T TL1-TI!11- THE INV. IN OF THE OTHER
i% COMPACTED 72 RCP. INV. OUT FOR
-!' SUBGRADE BOTH 72" RCP's SHALL

/-EDGE

230
220
210
200
190
1 CROSSING #2 PROFILE
C-0 2B SCALE: HORIZ.: 1"=100'
VERT.: 1 "=10'
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A.
3344 HIUMOROUGH ST. PHONE [phone] EASTERN AVENUE PHONE: [phone]
SUITE 250 FAX: [phone] NASHVILLE. N.C. 27856 FAX (252) M-8197
RALEIGH. N.C. 27607
MIDDLESEX CORPORATE CENTER
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT
NASH COUNTY, NC
CROSSING #2 - DETAILS
230
220
210
200
190
C-028
88+00 90+00 92+00
IXISIING GRADE
2 TYPICAL SECTION
C-0 2B SCALE: N.T.S.
U ^
' w?,,,..:..' ,.^N'" " ? / /' ? ?,,/ Q/ ? " Y .N''?M' .. '?, ..,.."'`*, N ?? ?,':d Y? , ?.' /?y4? fi?,?..„„? .?^'? ".r'.'r ?'
ANN f,.. ?.•' M,,. ;zL"Y YFiAPe N
..'^^n, ,N' M,y r'." ?. ?^a.., ,oN?•-n „ r ,,,.,. .,,y} ( rr...? ^, y%"
07
-.... ??r, ? y,f? ^„N b'?n,{? ,1. ,t.x,.gXr`tf?,? ?+^r`?.i .r,,.w, \??.N,?;i ..:r.?? e? ...
.,,..^.. ?. ?'? ? \ Y \?, r:r^'? .N' r„ ? ... ` F? f?-° ?f" .+,'.-.N" a ?,?,,.,-•-^ „t N"'",
QQ N N .N _ tow
,„r ?„? .r ?,,, •- N'ON' .d' ,..r` d r ? f
N ,rte ?,- _ `SEGMENTAL
-~ " RftAINING
- ?-• ?;N,-,,,. ,, v- ?;,?-r'.? ,,,N? " ?' WALL ???
i AC1iANNEt
PERM.
CHANNEL
'.?
--`°' .I M PACT
--/"TEMP.. CHAN
„N,"I M PACT .
?t y E S
ww STREAM
ry
? l
CREEK .w.
5?KTERLINE
-DOUBLTOB BEGIN ZONE--4-8UFFER, OMIT
ZONE 1
BUFFER " ON€ - 'I UFFER -•LIMI
IMPORTANT. --PER NNIAW STREAM NN s jt '
ZONE _1'---IMlPACT ld,79,9 SFN
ZONE 2 -IMPACT 6,311_/F`
? l
TEMPORARY-CHANNEL LINEAR AMPACT = f0 LF- "
TEMPORARY CHANNEL AREA IMPACT = 60 SF
PERMANENT CHANNEL LINEAR IMPACT = 180 LF SCALE: 1" = 50'
PERMANENT CHANNEL AREA IMPACT = 1080 SF o 5o 100 125 150
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A. MIDDLESEX CORPORATE CENTER
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT
3344 HUSBOROUGN ST. PHONE [phone] EASTERN AVENUE PHONE [phone] NASH COUNff NC C-03A
SUITE 250 FAX [phone] NASHAUE, N.C. 27858 FAX [phone]
RALEIGH, N.C. 27807 CROSSING #3 - DETAILED SITE PLAN
07/16/09
230
220
210
200
10+00 12+00 14+00
1 CROSSING #1 PROFILE
C-0 3B SCALE: HORIZ.: 1"=100'
VERT.: 1 "=10'
G RD.
POINT
2%_ + L r=`-T7 I 2X - I I _2%
RETAINING
WALL
230
220
210
200
INV. IN ON ONE 60" RCP
PIPE BURIED 7" BELOW SHALL BE V HIGHER THAN
EXISTING GRADE 2 THE INV. IN OF THE OTHER
TYPICAL SECTION 60" RCP. INV. OUT FOR
BOTH 60" RCP's SHALL
C-03B SCALE: N.T.S. BE THE SAME.
STOCKS ENGINEERING, P.A. MIDDLESEX CORPORATE CENTER
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT
5344 HILLSBOROUGH ST. PHONE: [phone] EASTERN AVENUE PHONE [phone] NASH COUNTY INC C-03B
SUITE 250 FAX: [phone] NASHMLLE, N.C. 27858 FAIL [phone]
RALEIGH, N.C. 27807
CROSSING #3 - DETAILS
07116/09
Statement of Compliance with Session Law 2008-152 An Act to Promote
Compensatory Mitigation by Private Mitigation Banks
(link to SL 2008-152)
Prior to accessing the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) In-Lieu Fee
Mitigation Program, all applicants requesting wetlands and/or stream mitigation
are now required by law to comply with Session Law 2008-152 An Act to
Promote Compensatory Mitigation by Private Mitigation Banks. All new
requests submitted on or after Oct. 1, 2008 MUST include this form signed and
dated by the permit applicant or an authorized agent. Applicants with unexpired
acceptance letters may continue with their plans to use the In-Lieu Fee Program
or withdraw their request and seek other available,mitigation options.
Compliance Statement:
1 have read and understand SL-2008-152 and have, to the best of my knowledge,
complied with its requirements.
Please check all that apply:
There are no known private mitigation banks with the requested credit type
located in the hydrologic unit where this impact will take place (link to DWQ
list
I have contacted the mitigation bank(s) in the hydrologic unit where the impacts
will occur and credits are not available.
The application was submitted to the regulatory agencies prior to October 1,
2008.
Note: It is the applicant's responsibility to document any inquiries made to private
mitigation banks.
Signature o A ant or Agent
. utr 1q, 2.001
T4,VL_ b Sm / m
Printed Name
Date 1
Project Name Location
NORTH CAROLINA ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM, NCEEP
IN-LIEU FEE REQUEST FORM
Revised 05/27/2009
Print this form, fill in requested information, sign and date, and either mail to NCEEP, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC
27699-1652, fax to 919-715-2219, or email to Valerie. MitchenerCa)_ncdenr.gov with a copy to kellv.williamsCaDncdenr oov
Attachments are acceptable for clarification purposes (location map is required). Review meetings are held on Monday afternoons
and decisions are provided within 2 weeks.
f ONTACT INFORMATION --? APPLICANT'S AGENT (optional) --? APPLICANT
1. Business or Individual Name 5? ?S ?,-?C?rrr'El?.a[> tiJ??pv Nrr
2. Street Address or P O Box _ 32;gq Sr-, l ZD 1.1, !-J S !-)[i 1,v--' ?T
3. City State, Zip
-- ,-? L-
4. Contact Person 9p?,44)r-p- L
----
5. Telephone Number 7/q-$21- ZgyD _;Z- q51 I$DO
6. Fax Number -----??
7. E-Mail Address (oPtiona)
_ s??1 i 1-? 8? Sy-ac- kS Pn , Mer-N'>•r ,ro ? ?--- ??-----' 69
l -- pr,? qP i?0?se has?,cp?++ ?. Q?
'ROJECT INFORMATION
_ _ ____ _ _____ _ -----------
_8. Project Name
- -- -- .._
9. Project Location (nearest town, city)
# ATTACH MAP SHOWING IMPACT LOCATION *
10. Lat_Long Coordinates (optional)
11. Project County
12. Raver Basin Cataloging Unit (8-digit)
(See Note 1)
13. Project Type
14. Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.) (e.g., 0.13)
15. Non-Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.) -.-
16. Coastal Marsh Impact (ac.) 17. Stream Impact (ft.)
(See Note 2)
_. ---- --.
----- - - --- ------------
L4r:
? Government Private Commercial
b, D
D, O
Warm ,_,e Cool Cold
-_._? _._ a.....-...
18. Buffer Impact (sq.
(See Notes) Zone 1: 11?' TC) ;Zone 2: /h23tm
19. Regulatory Agency Staff Contacts
Indicate names, if known) = USACE: DWQ: ?,¢ (aiuCt41
Z0. Other Regulatory ID Information
(e.g., USACE Action ID, if known) us4et Ar r"0d l ZOOgIO?(oyO Dw?? ?K?' -p 'pG
IMPORTANT
Check (?) below if this request is a: Signature of Applicant or Agent:
- revision to a current acceptance, or
- re-submission of an expired acceptance
_ extension of unexpired acceptance
Date: ?u L1C q, U09
Note 1: For help in determining the Cataloging Unit, visit: http://c bub.epa.gov/surf/locate/index cfm or call EEP contacts below -
Note 2: For guidance on stream temperatures, go to:
htto://www.saA us cce.armv mil/WETLANDS/Mitigation/Documents/Stream/Appendices/Appendix) pdf
Note 3. Buffer mitigation applicable only in the Neuse, Tar-Pamlico and Catawba river basins, and the Randleman Lake Water
Supply Watershed.
Direct questions to Valerie Mitchener at 919-715-1973 or valerie.mitchenerna ncdenr gov or Kelly Williams at 919-716-1921 or
kelly.williamsCc)ncdenr gov
Vz