20050810 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20050509

r?
J L%W111
}yet
PROGRAM
RECEIPT
August 22, 2006
Governor Village Commercial
P O Box 889
Hot Springs, VA 24445
Project:
ILF No:
County:
DWQ #:
USACE Action ID:
Amount Paid:
Check Number:
Governors Village
ILF-FME-2005-1763
Chatham
2005-0810
200520149
$ 55,221.25
1161
o c????c? D
Q
AUG 2 2006
DENR - WAXER UUAUTY
wETL4ND3 AND sToRwATER BRANCH
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) has received checks as indicated above as payment for the
compensatory mitigation requirements of the 401 Water Quality Certification/Section 404 Permit issued for the above
referenced project. This receipt serves as notification that the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project have
been satisfied. You must also comply with all other conditions of this certification and any other state, federal or local
government permits or authorization associated with this activity.
The NCEEP, by acceptance of this payment, acknowledges that the NCEEP is responsible for the compensatory mitigation
requirements associated with the project permit and agrees to provide the compensatory mitigation as specified in the permit.
The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the NC Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the US Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998, as indicated below.
River Basin Wetlands Credits Stream Credits Buffer
CU (Sq. Ft.)
Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh Cold Cool Warm
Cape Fear

03030002 0.75 0 0 0 0 148 0
Please note that a payment made to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program is not reimbursable unless a request for
reimbursement is received within 12 months of the date of the receipt. Any such request must also be accompanied by letters
from the permitting agencies stating that the permit and/or authorization have been rescinded. If you have any questions or
need additional information, please contact David Robinson at [phone].
Sincerely,
William D. Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Jean B. Manuele, USACE-Raleigh
Eric Kulz, DWQ-Raleigh
Edmund Waddill, Crosland-Raleigh
File
1Z:utoru-tg... Ex""... Prot" oar stag

North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net
o stem
PROGRAM
Bob Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
August 8, 2006.
Project: Governors Village County: Chatham
2_Gc)5C810
CP 05
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send
copies of the 404/401/CAMA permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or the 401
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
RIVER BASIN Cape Fear CU 03030002
Wetland-Riparian ac 0.365 Stream-Warm ft 148
Wetland-Non-Riparian ac - Stream-Cool ft -
Coastal Marsh ac - Stream-Cold ft -
Buffer-Zone 1 s ft) -
Buffer-Zone 2 (s ft -
Upon receipt of payment, NCEEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted
impacts up to a 2:1 mitigation-to-impact ratio, (buffers, Zone 1 up to a 3:1 ratio and Zone 2 up to a 1.5:1 ratio). The type and
amount of the compensatory mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 Permit and/or 401 Water Quality Certification,
and/or CAMA Permit. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the
N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact David Robinson at [phone].
Sincerely,
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Todd Tugwell, USACE-Raleigh
Eric Kulz, DWQ-Raleigh
File
illcto D. Gilmore, PE
Director ? r(?•
l?J
UG 1 p 'lUU6
R whoring... E ... Prot" Our fta&
A
DEpS AND S 3 0 i401
WE "ADS
A
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net

=? : o stem
PROGRAM
INVOICE
August 11, 2006
Dan Vincent
Governors Club Limited Partnership
P O Box 3923
Sanford, NC 27331
Project: Governors Village
County: Chatham
DWQ No: 05-0810
USACE Action ID: 200520149
EEP Record No: ILF-FME-2005-1763
You have elected to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements of the Section 401/404 permit issued for the above reference
project through payment of a fee to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). In accordance with 15A NCAC
2H.0500, the amount you owe is based upon the FY 2006-07 Fee Schedule and has been calculated as follows (Please note: payment
of wetlands is calculated in increments of 0.25 acres). If you have any questions concerning this payment, please call David Robinson
at 919-715-2228.
Riparian Wetlands 0.75 acres x $ 27,847.00 = $ 20,885.25
Non-Riparian Wetlands 0 acres x $ 13,924.00 = $
Saltwater Wetland 0 acres x $139,235.00 = $
Stream 148 linear feet x $ 232.00 = $ 34,336.00
Buffer -Zone 1 0 square feet x $ .96 = $
Buffer - Zone 2 0 square feet x $ .96 = $
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $ 55,221.25
Please mail a check payable to NCEEP for the Total Amount Due to the address below, and enclose a copy of this invoice.
NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Please note that a payment made to NCEEP is not reimbursable unless a request for reimbursement is received within 12 months of
the date of the receipt. Any such request must be accompanied by letters from the permitting agencies stating that the permit and/or
authorization have been rescinded. If the payment check's account name is not the same as the permit holder's name please include a
signed statement that the check is being written on behalf of and with full knowledge of the permit holder.
YOU MUST BE IN POSSESSION OF THE PAYMENT RECEIPT FROM NCEEP PRIOR TO COMMENCING THE
ACTIVITIES AUTHORIZED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF ARMY 404 PERMIT AND/OR THE 401 WATER QUALITY
CERTIFICATION.
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Jean B, Manuele, USACE-Raleigh
Eric Kulz, DWQ-Raleigh
Bob Zarzecki, S&EC-Raleigh (fax)
1?? G ? ? "LOiJ6
Edmund Waddill, Crosland (fax)
File is
Rerto?u-t?... E ... Protect' Our St&& F
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
October 3, 2005
Governors Club Limited Partnership
Attn: Dan Vincent
PO Box 3923
Sanford, NC 27331
Re: Governors Village, Chapel Hill, NC, Chatham County
DOA Action ID 200520149, DWQ Project No. 20050810
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Vincent:
Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No. 3539 issued to Mr. Dan Vincent of Governors Club Limited
Partnership, dated September 30, 2005. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local
permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Solid Waste, Sediment and
Erosion Control, Stormwater, Dam Safety, Non-discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us.
AWK/dae
Attachments: Certificate of Completion
Sincerely, J
4?r
GEti i7?
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
cc: Todd Tugwell, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Wilmington District, USACOE
Eric Kulz, DWQ, Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office '
File Copy
Central Files
Bob Zarzecki-S&EC, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
Shelton Sullivan, DWQ, NPS Assistance & Compliance Oversight Unit
Filename: 050810GovernorsClub(Chatham) 401
4010versight/Express Review Permits Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Ralegh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
One
f Carolina
N6
NIM(MIly
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
" Mr. Dan Vincent, Governors Club Limited Partnership
Page 2 of 5
October 3, 2005
NORTH CAROLINA 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401 Public Laws 92-
500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
Regulations in 15 NCAC 2H, Section.0500 to Mr. Dan Vincent of Governors Club Limited Partnership to
permanently fill 0.365 acres of wetlands and 202 linear feet of stream channel (including 168 linear feet of
perennial streams, of which 20 linear feet are temporary and 34 linear feet of temporary intermittent
streams) and 0.041 acres of open water impacts associated with the construction of the Governors Village
development in Chatham County, North Carolina, pursuant to an application filed on the 6th day of May of
2005, and in additional correspondence received August 8, 2005.
The application and supporting documentation provides adequate assurance that the proposed work will
not result in a violation of applicable Water Quality Standards and discharge guidelines. Therefore, the
State of North Carolina certifies that this activity will not violate the applicable portions of Sections 301,
302, 303, 306, 307 of PL 92-500 and PL 95-217 if conducted in accordance with the application, the
supporting documentation, and conditions hereinafter set forth.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design submitted in the application materials and as
described in the Public Notice. If the project is changed, prior to notification a new application for a new
Certification is required. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification
and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions of this Certification. Any
new owner must notify the Division and request the Certification be issued in their name. Should wetland
or stream fill be requested in the future, additional compensatory mitigation may be required as described
in 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h) (6) and (7). If any plan revisions from the approved site plan result in a
change in stream or wetland impact or an increase in impervious surfaces, the DWQ shall be notified in
writing and a new application for 401 Certification may be required. For this approval to be valid,
compliance with the conditions listed below is required.
Conditions of Certification:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:
Amount Approved nits Plan Location or Reference
Stream 148 (feet) permanent Final project impacts as listed in
perennial impacts May 6, 2005 Individual Permit
(Also 20 feet perennial Application from Soil &
and 34 feet of intermittent Environmental Consultants, PA
temporary stream impacts)
404 Wetlands 0.331 (acres) permanent Final project impacts as listed in
impacts May 6, 2005 Individual Permit
(Also 0.034 acres Application from Soil &
temporary impacts) Environmental Consultants, PA
Open Waters 0.041 (acres) of permanent Final project impacts as listed in
impacts May 6, 2005 Individual Permit
Application from Soil &
Environmental Consultants, PA
Mr. Dan Vincent, Governors Club Limited Partnership
Page 3 of 5
October 3, 2005
Sediment and Erosion Control:
2. Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in
accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
e. Sufficient materials required for stabilization and/or repair of erosion control measures and
stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times.
3. No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond
the footprint of the impacts depicted in the 404/401Permit Application. All construction activities,
including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best
Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards,
statutes, or rules occur;
4. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum
extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is
unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that
the Division of Land Resources has released the project;
Continuing Compliance:
5. Mr. Dan Vincent and/or Governors Club Limited Partnership shall conduct construction activities
in a manner consistent with State water quality standards (including any requirements resulting
from compliance with section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act) and any other appropriate
requirements of State law and federal law. If the Division determines that such standards or laws
are not being met (including the failure to sustain a designated or achieved use) or that State or
federal law is being violated, or that further conditions are necessary to assure compliance, the
Division may reevaluate and modify this Certification to include conditions appropriate to assure
compliance with such standards and requirements in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0507(d).
Before modifying the Certification, the Division shall notify Mr. Dan Vincent and/or Governors
Club Limited Partnership and the US Army Corps of Engineers, provide public notice in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0503 and provide opportunity for public hearing in accordance
with 15A NCAC 211.0504. Any new or revised conditions shall be provided to Mr. Dan Vincent
and/or Governors Club Limited Partnership in writing, shall be provided to the United States
Army Corps of Engineers for reference in any Permit issued pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act, and shall also become conditions of the 404 Permit for the project;
r
Mr. Dan Vincent, Governors Club Limited Partnership
Page 4 of 5
October 3, 2005
Road Crossings:
6. Culvert Installation
Culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream profiles
are not altered. Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section dimensions, pattern, and
longitudinal profile) must be maintained above and below locations of each culvert. Culverts shall
be designed and installed to allow for aquatic life movement as well as to prevent head cutting of the
streams. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched, the appropriate stream grade shall be re-
established or, if the pipes installed in a perched manner, the pipes shall be removed and re-installed
correctly.
The establishment of native, woody vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques
must be used where practicable instead of riprap or other bank hardening methods. If riprap is
necessary, it shall not be placed in the streambed, unless specifically approved by the Division of
Water Quality.
Installation of culverts in wetlands must ensure continuity of water movement and be designed to
adequately accommodate high water or flood conditions.
Stormwater Management:
7. Since the project is located in a WS-IV, Nutrient Sensitive Waters, it will be required that within
60 days of the issuance of this Certification, a final, written stormwater management plan
(including a signed and notarized Operation and Maintenance Agreement) for the 76-Unit
Townhomes (proposed developed area west of Village Pond) and the 49-Lot residential
subdivision (proposed developed area east of the Village Pond) shall be approved in writing by the
Division of Water Quality's Wetlands Unit. The facilities must be designed to remove 85% TSS,
as well as treat nitrogen in the runoff from each area by using extended detention wetlands, bio-
retention areas, and/or ponds followed by forested filter strips (designed according to latest version
of the NC DENR Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual). Also, before any permanent
building or other structure is occupied in each area, the facilities (as approved by the Wetlands
Unit) for that area shall be constructed and operational, and the stormwater management plans for
these areas (as approved by the Wetlands Unit) shall be implemented. The structural stormwater
practices as approved by the Wetlands Unit as well as drainage patterns must be maintained in
perpetuity. No changes to the structural stormwater practices shall be made without written
authorization from the Division of Water Quality. However, in an effort to be accommodating to
what may be unique site specific constraints DWQ will accept an equivalent amount of presently
untreated onsite stormwater to offset the new impervious surface that is being proposed to occur
with these project areas (Our hope is that this would be easier site specific constraints).
Other conditions:
8. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of the project, the Applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" form to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the §401 Certification has been
completed. The responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the 401/Wetlands
Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality upon completion of the project. Please send photographs
upstream and downstream of each culvert site to document correct installation along with the
Certificate of Completion form.

Mr. Dan Vincent, Governors Club Limited Partnership
Page 5 of 5
October 3, 2005
9. Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within these
boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange warning fencing
(or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved to infringe within the
buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure compliance.
10. Construction Stormwater Permit NCGO 10000
Upon the approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan issued by the Division of Land
Resources (DLR) or a DLR delegated local erosion and sedimentation control program, an NPDES
General stormwater permit (NCGO10000) administered by DWQ is automatically issued to the
project. This General Permit allows stormwater to be discharged during land disturbing
construction activities as stipulated by conditions in the permit. If your project is covered by this
permit [applicable to construction projects that disturb one (1) or more acres], full compliance with
permit conditions including the sedimentation control plan, self-monitoring, record keeping and
reporting requirements are required. A copy of this permit and monitoring report forms may be
found at http://h2o.enr.state.iic.uslsu/Forms Documents.htm.
11. Deed Notifications
Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands,
waters and protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer
impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or
buffers approved for impact under this Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate. A
sample deed notification can be downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. The text of the sample deed notification may be modified as
appropriate to suit to this project.
Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as
depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 Permit.
If this Certification is unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written
request within sixty (60) days following receipt of this Certification. This request must be in the form of a
written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes and filed with the
Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. If
modifications are made to an original Certification, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing on the
modifications upon written request within sixty (60) days following receipt of the Certification. Unless
such demands are made, this Certification shall be final and binding.
This the 3rd day of October 2005
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
i -?
r Alan t. Klimek, P.E.
AWK/dae
QF W aT,9 Michael F. Easley, Governor
`O? QG
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
?- North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
C3 = ' ?( Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
-;v Division of Water Quality
May 1, 2006
DWQ Project # 05-0810
Chatham County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Mark Ashness, P.E.
CE Group, Inc.
1051 Pemberton Hill Road, Suite 201
Apex, NC 27502
Subject Property: Governors Village
UT to Cub Creek [NEU03, 16-41-2-10-(0.5), WS-IV, NSW]
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Ashness:
On March 28, 2006, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your stormwater management plans
in regard to the conditions of the Individual Water Quality Certification dated October 3, 2005. DWQ has
reviewed these plans and will require additional information before we can approve these plans.
Additional Information Requested:
1. You submitted an Operations and Maintenance Manual, however, there are some deficiencies in
this document. Specific concerns include the control of exotics and/or nuisance species (e.g.,
cattails) and nutrient management (i.e., turfgrass management and the potential for algal blooms
in the stormwater BMPs). You may find this guidance information on maintenance of pond and
wetland BMPs helpful in developing a suitable operations and maintenance plan for the
Governors Village stormwater facilities:
http://wxvw.stonnwatercenter.net/Manual Builder/Maintenance Manual/introduction.htm.
2. The maintenance agreement was not signed and notarized. Please provide a signed and notarized
Operations and Maintenance agreement for the stormwater facilities.
Please provide DWQ with one (1) original and three (3) additional copies of this information.
Please contact the DWQ within three (3) weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information or to
verify that you have received this letter and require additional time to submit the information.
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone]/ FAX [phone] / Internet: httu'Ahi2o elrr.state.nc us/nctivetlands
None Carolina
,gturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Governors Village.
Page 2 of 2
May 1, 2006
Please contact Cynthia Van Der Wiele at 919.733.5715 if you have any questions or would like to set up a
meeting to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
Cyndi B. Karoly, Manager
NCDWQ 401/Wetlands Oversite Unit
CBK/cvdw
cc: Bob Zarzecki, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
Todd Tugwell, USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Steve Levitas, Kilpatrick Stockton, LLP, 3737 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 400, Raleigh, NC 27612
Danny Smith, DWQ
File Copy
Filename: 050810GovernorsVillage(Chatham)storm more inf62
Project Name: Gov Villagt W/L 2
Project No. DWQ 050810
SUBMITTED DESIGN: REQUIRED DESIGN:
elevations

Permanent Pool (ft) 244.7 3
Temporary Pool (ft) 247.7 3 ft. depth ok
areas
Permanent Pool SA (sq ft) 28278 112704 sq. ft. check surfac
Drainage Area (ac) 143.54
Impervious Area (ac) 60.57 42.2%
-
Forebay (ft2) 11700 41.37492 % check forebc
High Marsh (ft2) 9000 31.8 % check marsh
Low Marsh (ft2) 9000 31.8 % check marsh
Micropool (ft2) 4435 15.68357 % ok
120.7122 %
volumes
Temporary Pool (cu ft) 193303 223935 cu. ft. check tempo
other parameters
SA/DA 7004 1.80 -
Orifice Diameter (in) 6 1.16 cfs drawdown -
Design Rainfall (in) 1 1.9 day drawdown check draws
Linear Interpolation of Correct SAIDA * * *
% Impervious
Next Lowest 40
Project Impervious 42.2
Next Highest 50
3 ft. Permanent Pool Depth
SA/DA from Table
1.73
1.80
2.06
Project Name: Gov Village
Project No. DWQ 050810
Pond 1
SUBMITTED DESIGN.-
elevations
Bottom of Basin (ft) 236.7
Permanent Pool (ft) 243.7
Temporary Pool (ft) 246.7
areas
Permanent Pool SA (sq ft) 97804
Drainage Area (ac) 143.54
Impervious Area (ac) 60.55
volumes
Permanent Pool (cu ft) 418645
Temporary Pool (cu ft) 268592
Forebay (cu ft) 34135
other parameters
SA/DA L43
Orifice Diameter (in) 6
Design Rainfall (in) 1
Linear Interpolation of Correct SAIDA * * *
% Impervious
Next Lowest 40
Project Impervious 42.2
Next Highest 50
REQUIRED DESIGN.
4.3 average depth status
7 ft. depth check depth
3 ft. depth ok
93508 sq. ft. ok
66360 based on avg depth ok
42.2%
-
223869 cu. ft. ok
8.2% checkforebc
1.50 -
1.16 cfs drawdown -
2.7 day drawdown ok
7 ft. Permanent Pool Depth
SA/DA fron (Avg. Depth)
1.43 0.981842972 1.08
1.50 1.06 1.16
1.73 1.345865404 1.43
3 ft 4

Design Calculations and Work Sheets
FOR
GOVERNORS VILLAGE FOND DAM
MODIFICATION
CHATHAM COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
March 2006
G Grou ,ne.
p?
LAN I] USE !=\/ALUATI ON
C1\/I L 1="GI "1=1=FZ1 "G
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
11000 Regency Parkway, 5uite 410
Cary, NC 2751 1

Voce [phone] - fax [phone]
PROJECT SUMMARY:
The proposed revi5ion5 include modification of an existing 4 AC wet pond that provides a temporary storage pool for
the 0.5" storm event. The current pond lacks a forebay and littoral shelf. In response to the recent 401 approval for
the project, modification5 to improve the water duality performance are enclosed. The ex15tmg pond will be divided into
an upper and lower pond.
The upper pond will be an extended detention wetland acting also a5 a forebay for the lower wet pond. The extended
detention wetland basin has been Sized to the largest available volume given ex15ting Site con5tramt5. Patrick 5mith with
S*EC has prepared a grading plan for the wetland basin providing small forebay5 at all 5tormwater entry points.
Variation of elevation within the wetland ba5m has been provided to accommodate a wide range of plant 5peoe5. S*EC
has also prepared a detailed planting plan with 5pecification5.
The lower pond has been redesigned to meet the surface area / drainage area and temporary pool recluirement5 for
the I " storm event. The existing 5pdiway has been analyzed and determined to be acceptable with the exception of the
drawdown orifice which. will be mcrea5ed from 4 - G" in 51ze. A 10' littoral shelf has also been provided. There 15 one
existing dramage outfall from a 5mc3le family re51dential phase that d15charge5 directly into the wet pond. A rip rap or
gabien forebay has been provided for this lone outfall. The remainder of the watershed 15 directed into the extended
wetland first.
2
DUKE WEEKS OFFICE
>aa,
dvu � 1
I FUTUR9
(*P E6)
EXHIBIT MAP A (AERIAL)
Project Area Draining to
Existing Stormwater Pond
SCALE: V'= 300'
March 2006
C6Group, Inc.
LAN E7 P N N I N G,
CIVIL ENGINEERING
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
11000 R"aioy Fakvry, 3wW 410, Cay, N.C. 2731 1
Yom(DIS)367-67901 Far h I9) ✓1C7-0791

11-T -

L??
If Ir l ?
i
f
,J 1
r ?

EL
I

?f rte. -...r..-

2

¦Il i
C.,

i I i 1 4 yn.,u, ? 3
gRE
4 ?{ k + II \ ^ { w rr P wti??
245,
r -
µrn
f, 9 oPME ? ?+ ? ? i ?, 9
- -- - • PHASE 2 LOTS 90 smah 4100 pw Lot 9.80 maw
`? ?? j 09 Mirinf FUTLIRK PHAN S LOTS 49 SAM 3780 4.20 mu
- •,•-,1 ` a`" \ APARTMENTS 1.97 man 1 1.97 *am
y -
DUKE WEEKS OFFICE 8.66 man 1 8.66 mu
ROADS THROUGHOUT PROJECT 1629 mans 1 1629 nnw
FOOD LION 4.44 coons 1 4A4 mops
FOOD LION OUT PARCEL 1.1 mama 0.9 0.99 saw
-1 "`-- ` FUTURE OUT PARCEL C 2.3 mains 0.6 1.114 man 60%
,. ... "4? f FUTURK OUT PARCEL D 42 man 0.6 8.80 man 60%
r SIDEWALK 226641.1. 6 2.00 man
TRAIL 262014. 10 0.60 man
SPILLWAY 0.22 san 1 0.22 morn
EXISTING TOWNHOMES 3,06 man 1 3.06 man
FUTURE TOWNHOUSE 2.16 man 1 2.16 saw
?- ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT 6,46 mans 1 6A6 mans
- TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 60.66 saw
TOTAL WATERSHED 143.64 man
PERCENT IMPERVIOUS 422
EXHIBIT MAP B (TOPOGRA `?.
Project Area Draining to Group, Inc.
Existing Stormwater P?y?,,,? LAN o PLAN N I NG
SCALE: 1" s 3006 CIVIL ENGINMrIZING
March 2006 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
NORTH 1 1000 K"smvy F&WW.U" 410, Gay, N.C. 27511
vowro9s1sG7e7mo MrolmXx7a7m1
Project No. DWQ (to be provided by DWQ)
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - 401 WET DETENTION BASIN WORKSHEET
DWO Stormwater Management Plan Review:
A complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a wet' detention basin worksheet for each basin,
design calculations, plans and specifications showing all basin and outlet structure details, and a fully executed
operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional
information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
1. PROJECT INFORMATIM1 ase complete
Project Name :
Contract Person:
For projects with multiple basins, specify which basir.
Basin Bottom Elevation . -7 ft.
Permanent Pool Elevation ft.
Temporary Pool Elevation ig 4 /"o , +_ ft.
o lowin information :
_ Phone Number: °
this worksheet applies to: W,&
(average elevation of the floor of the basin)
(elevation of the orifice invert out)
(elevation of the outlet structure invert in)
Permanent Pool Surface Area q'T 5;0 4- sq. ft. (water surface area at permanent pool elevation)
Drainage Area ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
Impervious Area foD. S ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
Permanent Pool Volume v2% 4 cu. ft. (combined volume of main basin and forebay)
Temporary Pool Volume Ir 9;;61' cu. ft. (volume detained on top of the permanent pool)
Forebay Volume cu. ft.
SA/DA used k 4 (surface area to drainage area ratio)
Diameter of Orifice dw in. (draw down orifice diameter)
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
The following checklist outlines design requirements per the Stormwater Best Management Practices manual
(N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources, November 1995) and Administrative Code
Section: 15 A NCAC 2H .1008. Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have
been met and supporting documentation is attached. I fa requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of
why.
The temporary pool controls runoff from the 1 inch storm event.
The basin length to width ratio is greater than 3:1.
The basin side slopes are no steeper than 3:1.
A submerged and vegetated perimeter shelf at less than 6:1 is provided.
Vegetation to the permanent pool elevation is specified.
An emergency drain is provided to drain the basin.
The permanent pool depth is between 3 and 6 feet (required minimum of 3 feet).
The temporary pool draws down in 2 to 5 days. 02
The forebay volume is approximately equal to 20% of the total basin volume. ? = OZVOC
Sediment storage is provided in the permanent pool.
Access is provided for maintenance.
A minimum 30-foot vegetative filter is provided at the outlet. 1;:41
A site specific operation and maintenance (O&M) plan is provided.
A vegetation management/mowing schedule is provided in the O&M plan.
Semi-annual inspections are specified in the O&M plan.
A debris check is specified in the O&M plan to be performed after every storm event.
A specific sediment clean-out benchmark is listed (elevation or depth) in O&M plan.
A responsible party is designated in the O&M plan.
JFSWG100 09/97 Page 1 of 1
L6 Group, Inc.
LAND PLANNING
CIVIL ENGINEERING
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
? MEMO
? TELEPHONE

? FIELD REPORT
CALCULATIONS
AUTHOR:
DATE: TIME:
PROJECT: _
50JECT: _
CLIENT: Z'W
PROJECT NO.: -Q

rez :me t ' p ig

Zi p C -

4 T '
-

r

I rol

01
i

r

6 4 ? V T 4 + U L

11000 Regency Parkway, Suite 410, Cary, NC 27511
Voice [phone] Fax [phone]
Gov. Village Wet Pond
Wet Pond
Q=CIA C 1(100) AC
0.45 9.5 143.54
Proposed Impervious
Impervious Total
Wet Detention Pond Design
Total Drainage Area -
Impervious On-Site Area -
Soils -
Hydraulic Soils Group -
Curve Number -
Minimum TR-55 Time of concentration =
Time of Concentration used =
Percentage of Impervious Area -
Average Depth
SA/DA ratio
Surface Area Required =
Surface Area Provided =
1"Storage Volume
Rv = 0.05+0.009 (1)
I = Percent Impervious
60.570 Acres
143.540 Acres
60.570 Acres
5 min.
5 min.
42%
4.3 feet
1.43
2.05 Acres
89,412 s.f.
97,804 s.f.
Rv = 0.430 (in./in.)
Volume = (Design Rainfall) (Rv) (Drainage Area)
1" Volume Required = 5.139 ac.ft.
1 223,845 c.f.
1" Volume Provided = 268,592 c.f.
614 US
Governors Village Wet Pond U?T POHL:)

rve< CO-
Revised Wet Pon d - 03127106
Total Drainage Area - 143.540 Acres
Impervious On-Site Area - 60.570 Acres
Percentage of Impervious Area - 42.2%
1"Storage Volume
Rv = 0.05+0.009 (1)
= Percent Impervious
Rv = 0.430 (in./in.)
Volume = (Design Rainfall) (Rv) (Drainage Area)
1" Vol. Req.- 5.139 acres
223,645 c.f.
b. Wet Storage Provided
Incremental Total Total
Elev. Area (sf.) Volume (cf.) Volume (cf.) Volume (gal.) Depth (ft.)
243.7 97,804
89,690 89,690 670,881.20 1
242.7 81,576
79,628 169,318 1,266,498.64 2
241.7 77,680
75,764 245,082 1,633,209.62 3
240.7 73,847
71,963 317,045 2,371,492.86 4
239.7 70,079
68,228 385,272 2,881,834.56 5
238.7 66,376
33,263 418,535 3,130,641.80 6
237.7 150
110 418,645 3,131,464.60 7
236.7 70
Average Hydraulic Depth 4.28 Feet
c. Temporary Storage Provided
Incremental Total Total
Elev. Area (sf.) Volume (cf.) Volume (cf.) Volume (gal.) Depth (ft.)
246.3 108,757
64,518 64,518 482,592.40 2
245.7 106,302
104,162 168,679 1,261,720.42 1
244.7 102,021
99,913 268,592 2,009,065.92 0
243.7 97,804
d. Drawdown of Temporary Storage Pool
Drawdown calculation for 1" Volume
Orifice required for 25 Day Drawdown
2.60 ft 1.30 ft
6.00 in. Orifice Size Q2-day= 186,174
Q = 1.077 cis Q5-day= 465,435
So, this Orifice will drawdown pond in 2.89 days (This references required volume calc)
Storage depth= 2.60 It Intennim Calc. 9.14986
Average head= 1.30 ft Orifice Are a = 0.19625 Used for Q
.D
v
CD
j
m
r -
m
N N N N N
cii O 00 v
CDD 0
0
< ?
O ? _
v O o Cl 0 C)
0)
(a
CD 6 0
v N O O O O O U) Q
p ` N O)

CD CC)
N O' O O
=
CD (D 3 U7 W N x
C a)
- N
0) N rn ° N O

R co a) CY)
0 U)
• v n
7
cr
Pr
CL
O 3 `<
CD r- =" co

" N
?
3 R1 N
-1
1
N
O
X
O 4
, O .
A• -I (
D
O D) D -4 o cn W o
a ca d
m
CD s
0 3 v ?
c

s. o

g U)

v

N
m

-

I
Cr CD O L
CD v 3
(• a) ^
Q ...1 .l O
3 X m O 00 v O U1 -
CL A al 4 A N
aoi OF

3
=
r j
6 v 3 v
3
CD

CD

o
v,
co
CD m

0

Ul CO co
4l
m
(n
W
0
0

=r 0 (D
CD y C
CL -I
3 vi,
o rm-
O
v ?
CD
T
fl 0
Ul v _
U
i v v N
v
- ? O A N O

fJ
O
0
n
rn
U1
0
m

A
00
m
vo
=<
m
(D m
3
(3D (BCD
l< 0
(n 3
CL

DWQ Project
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY • 401 EXTENDED DETENTION (and POCKET*) WETLAND WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION please mplete the fvgwi g information):
Project Name :
Contact Person: E Phone Number. o
For projects with multiple basins, specify which basin this worksheet applies to: I/A

Permanent Pool Elevation 2 ft. (elevation of the orifice invert out)
Temporary Pool Elevation 241 :7 - :7 ft. (elevation of the outlet structure invert in)
Permanent Pool Surface Area sq. ft. (water surface area at permanent pool elevation)
Drainage Area ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
Impervious Area

ac.
CoaoEg

(on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
Forebay Surface Area 1 sq. ft. (at permanent pool elevation approximately 15%)*
Marsh 0"-9" Surface Area sq. ft. (at permanent pool elevation approximately 35%)*
Marsh 97-18" Surface Area sq. ft. (at permanent pool elevation approximately 35%)*
Micro Pool Surface Area W. AS 0 sq. ft. (at permanent pool elevation approximately 15%)*
Temporary Pool Volume ft. (volume detained on top of the permanent pool)
SA/DA used ©• ?T (surface area to drainage area ratio)*
Diameter of Orifice in. (draw down orifice diameter)
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project
Applicants Initials all
The temporary pool controls runoff from the 1 inch rain.
The basin side slopes are no steeper than 3:1.
A planting plan for the marsh areas with plant species and densities is provided.
Vegetation above the permanent pool elevation is specified.
An emergency drain is provided to drain the basin.
The temporary pool draws down in 2 to 5 days.
Sediment storage is provided in the permanent pool.
A sediment disposal area is provided.
Access is provided for maintenance.
z?
A site specific, signed and notarized operation and maintenance agreement is provided.
The drainage area (including any offsite area) is delineated on a site plan.
Access is provided for maintenance.
Plan details for the wetland are provided.
Plan details for the inlet and outlet are provided.
A site specific operation and maintenance agreement, signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided (s
http://h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetiandsloandm.doc).
* Pocket Wetlands have different design parameters and are only assumed to remove 35% TSS - See pp. 19 and 20 of the NC DENR
Stormwater BMP Manual, April 1999.10% open water, 50% high marsh, 40% low marsh.

Revised Wetland Pond - 03127106
Total Drainage Area - 143.540 Acres
Impervious On-Site Area - 60.570 Acres
Percentage of Impervious Area - 42.2%a
1"Storaw Volume
Rv = 0.05+0.009 (1)
I = Percent Impervious
Rv = 0.430 (in./in.)
Volume = (Design Rainfall) (Rv) (Drainage Area)
1" Vol. Req.- 5.139 acres
223,845 c.f.
i
b. Wet Storage Provided
Incrememal Total Total
Elev. Area (sf.) Volume (et.) Volume (cf.) Volume (gal.) Depth (ft.)
244.7 28,278
14,302 14,302 106,976.72 0.7
244 12,584
9,875 24,176 180,837.98 1.7
243 7,165
4,540 28,716 214,793.44 2.7
242 1,914
c. Temporary Storage Provided
Incremental Total Total
Elev. Area (at) Volume (cf.) Volume (cf.) Volume (gal.) Depth (ft.)
247.7 82,734
57,142 57,142 427,425.15 2.3
247 80,530
73,967 131,109 980,698.31 1.3
246 67,404
62,193 193,303 1,445,904.20 0
244.7 28,278
d. Drawdown of Temporary Storage Pool
Drawdown calculation for 1" Volume
Orifice required for 2-5 Day Drawdown
2.30 ft 1.15ft
6.00 in, Orifice Size 02-day= 175,104
Q= 1.013 ds Q5-day= 437,760
So, this Orifice will drawdown pond in 2.21 days (This references required volume talc)
Storage depth= 2.30 ft Intennim Cac. 8.60581
Average head= 1.15 ft Orifice Area = 0.19625 Used for Q

?D
N
CO
CD
m
N r

-4
Cp th. A.
O CO CO -I
U) 0)
S
0 N _
N -• N A
CD Cr a) O
N CS
70
`. 0
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 i O
N CD <
O N O O O O O O O
0
-I 0)
CD
00

= CD X
o CD
1-41 --4
1
1 co
C)
M
CO a
N
A
_. C
D n ? cr
_ 0) n `

.+ X a
A
N

O
A
? a ;D w =
N
0 N
=r CD
3
? N
n -?
i
OO
m CO
"
o
O
a ca v Q
CD m
o =
C
d O

N

N

n

(?_D

N

CCD O
A n O

N CD (? o

=N X
a m W
Cn W
- N
-l N
M -

m CD
cl) 3 v

O U3
CD O
n
p
=
CD

(
D O
O N (a

CD CD
? Q G
CD 0)
Lyl
a
C:)

=r 0 (D
CD y C
a
CD
3
a o
s r
O
O sv

O
N
co
m CD
oD
O
v

O
O
11
O
Ln
C7

N
A
.Z7
0
nO
W
3 CD
CD G
'+ CD
CO=D
0 a
l< -0
0 O
a
R T_.

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
GOVERNORS VILLAGE FOND DAM
MODIFICATION
CHATHAM COUNTY V
NORTH CAROLINA ? d
r??i,» Ri„ ?t ?I OpE
SEA
UV4
March 2006
G
Group, ,nc.
LAND USE: E?/P.LUP.TION
CI?/I IL E"GI "EE=tZI1VG
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
11000 Regency Parkway, Suite 410
Cary, NC 275 1 1
Voice [phone] - fax [phone]
Y. T
SECTION 02110 - CLEARING and GRUBBING for POND BOTTOM & EMBANKMENT
PART IGENERAL
1.01 Utilities
A. Contact all utility companies prior to excavation.
B. Locate utilities by hand excavation and protect from damage.
C. If lines are encountered that were not previously identified, promptly notify Owner's
Representative and Utility to insure that service is not interrupted. Locate on as-built drawings.
D. Cooperate with Owner's Representative and utility companies in maintaining services. Do not
break utility connections without providing temporary services acceptable to Owner's
Representative and utility company.
E. Repair damages to existing utilities as directed by utility company or reimburse the utility for the
work done as required.
I,
1.02 Explosives
Use of explosives will not be permitted.
1.03 Protections
A. Protect structures, utilities, sidewalks, pavements, and other facilities indicated to remain from
damage. Protect adjacent properties as required.
B. Provide suitable barricades to open excavations and provides adequate warning lights.
C. Protect existing trees and vegetation which are to remain from physical damage. Do not store
materials or equipment within the drip line.
D. Provide bracing, shoring, and dewatering in excavations as required to maintain sides, to protect
adjacent structures from settlement, and to prevent injury to personnel, complying with local and
OSHA regulations. Maintain bracing and shoring until excavations are backfilled.
E. Do not interfere with normal traffic on roads, streets, walks, and other adjacent occupied or used
facilities. When working in the NCDOT right-of-way, adhere to all requirements as outlined upon
the encroachment and driveway permit.
F. Restore affected areas to the condition existing prior to the start of work, unless otherwise directed.
F. Control air pollution, caused by dust and dirt, from becoming a nuisance to the public and
operations. Comply with governing regulations.
Governors Village Pond 02110-1

G. Burning of waste materials is not permitted. Burning of clearing materials is not allowed within
1200 feet of any residence. Upon authorization of the Owner burning of cleared material is
allowed provided all required local permits are obtained by the contractor and are adhered to.
H. Follow approved erosion control plan.
1.04 Clearing
A. Unless directed otherwise by Owner's Representative, remove all obstructions interfering with
construction or operation to a minimum of 2' below grade and properly dispose of off site.
Clearing to include but not be limited to such items as trees, shrubs, buildings, pavement, and
foreign articles from the area bounded by all curb or pavement lines and all adjoining property
lines.
B. Strip all vegetation, top soil, and rubble from the construction area. At the request of Owner's
Representative, excess fill or excavated dirt may be saved for later use.
C. Disposal. Remove from site and properly dispose of excess excavated material, trash, debris and
waste material. Inert material may be wasted within the project limits as directed by the Owner.
END OF SECTION 02110
Governors Village Pond
02110-2

UniSpec R 031004
SECTION 02370 - EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL
GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
Section Includes
Installation of temporary and permanent erosion and sedimentation control systems.
Installation of temporary and permanent slope protection systems.
Related Sections
Section 02110 - Site Clearing
Section 02300 - Earthwork
Section 02630 - Storm Drainage
Construction Drawings
1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS
A. Protect adjacent properties, any identified endangered or threatened species or critical habitat, any
identified cultural or historic resources, and receiving water resources from erosion and sediment
damage until final stabilization.
-Formatted: Bullets and Numbering ,
B. No disturbance allowed within existing wetland areas until U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 404 and
N.C. Division of Water Quality 401 permitting has been received and a copy on-site. Only disturb
areas as outlined within these approved permits.
PRODUCTS
2.1 MATERIALS
Quick growing grasses such as wheat, rye, or oats in accordance with Seeding Schedule upon the plans.
Silt Fencing for sedimentation control as specified on the Construction Drawings.
Rip-Rap as specified on the drawings.
Temporary and permanent outfall structures as specified on the drawings.
EXECUTION
3.1 PREPARATION
Review the drawings and approved Erosion Control Plan.
Conduct pre-construction meeting with Owner, Engineer, Geotechnical Engineer and Regulatory Agencies.
Governors Village Pond
3.2 EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL AND SLOPE PROTECTION
IMPLEMENTATION
A. Place erosion control systems in accordance with the drawings and approved permit or as may be
dictated by site conditions in order to maintain the intent of the specifications and permits.
B. Deficiencies or changes on the drawings or Erosion Control Plan shall be corrected or implemented as
site conditions change.
C. Owner has authority to limit surface area of erodible earth material exposed by clearing and grubbing,
excavation, borrow and embankment operations and to direct Contractor to provide immediate
permanent or temporary pollution control measures.
D. Maintain temporary erosion and sedimentation control systems as dictated by site conditions, indicated
in the construction documents, or as directed by governing authorities or Owner to control sediment
until final stabilization. Contractor shall respond to maintenance or additional work ordered by Owner
or governing authorities immediately, but in no case, within not more than 7 days if required at no
additional cost to the Owner.
E. Contractor shall incorporate permanent erosion control features, paving, permanent slope stabilization,
and vegetation into project at earliest practical time to minimize need for temporary controls.
F. Permanently seed and tack embankment slopes as embankment construction proceeds to extent
considered desirable and practical.
G. Slopes that erode easily or that will not be graded for a period of 14 days or more shall be temporarily
seeded as work progresses with wheat or rye unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents. In
the event it is not practical to seed areas, slopes must be stabilized with an asphalt tack or other means
to reduce the erosive potential of the area.
H. Permanent Riprap
(a) General
The contractor shall furnish all materials and labor required for placing riprap and
bedding to the lines and dimensions as shown on the drawings.
(b) Quality
Individual rocks shall be dense, sound, and resistant to abrasion and shall be free from
cracks, seams, and other defects that would tend to increase unduly their alteration by
water and frost actions. The rocks may be either angular, as obtained from quarry
operations, or round, except that round rocks shall not be placed on any surfaces having
slopes steeper than 2:1. The rocks shall have a minimum bulk specific gravity of 2.4 (150
pounds per cubic foot) when tested in accordance with ASTM C-99.
(c) Gradation
Meet NCDOT Specifications for gradation.
(d) Bedding
Bedding material shall be compacted in layers not exceeding 10 inches in loose thickness
by at least three coverages of the tread of a D8 tractor weighing at least 34,500 pounds.
Bedding material within 5 feet of structures shall be compacted in layers not exceeding 6
inches in loose thickness by hand-held power tampers. Bedding material shall be placed
Governors Village Pond
UniSpec II
SECTION 02300 - EARTHWORK
PART1-GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
Excavation, filling, and backfilling for dam embankment and structures
Trenching and backfilling for utilities.
B. Related Sections
Section 02370 - Erosion Control and Sedimentation. Temporary and permanent erosion control.
C. Order of Precedence: The "Foundation Subsurface Preparation" as shown on the The Drawings and any onsite
direction by their Project Geotechnical Engineer shall take precedence over the provisions of this section whenever
duplication or conflict occurs.
1.2 REFERENCES
A. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
ASTM D 422 - Standard Test Method For Particle Size Analysis of Soil
ASTM D 698 - Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort (12,400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600
kN.m/m3))
ASTM D 1557 - Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort (56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700
Kn.m/m3))
ASTM D 2922 - Density of Soil and Soil-Aggregate In Place by Nuclear Methods (Shallow Depth)
ASTM D 4318 - Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils
B. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)
AASHTO T 88 - Particle Size Analysis of Soils
C. North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT):
Standard Specifications for Construction and Materials
D. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
NFPA 70 - National Electrical Code
E. American Water Works Association (AWWA)
AWWA C200 - Standard For Steel Water Pipe - 6 In. (150 Mm) And Larger
AWWA C206 - Field Welding Of Steel Water Pipe
1.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE
A. An independent testing laboratory (GeoTechnologies), selected and paid for by the Owner, will be retained to
perform construction testing on site.
The independent testing laboratory shall prepare test reports that indicate test location, elevation data, and test
results. Owner, Civil Engineering Consultant, and Contractor shall be provided with copies of reports within 96
hours of time that test was performed. In event that test performed fails to meet Specifications, the independent
testing laboratory shall notify Owner and Contractor immediately.
02300-1
-Governors Village Pond 03/27/06
V_ t
Costs related to retesting due to failures shall be paid for by the Contractor at no additional expense to Owner.
Contractor shall provide free access to site for testing activities.
Quality assurance testing will be conducted in accordance with Paragraph "Field Testing" in Part 3 hereinafter.
1.4 DEFINITIONS
A. Satisfactory Soils: ASTM D 2487 soil classification groups GC, SC, ML, MH, CL, CH, GW, GP, GM, SW, SP,
and SM, or a combination of these group symbols; free of rock or gravel larger than allowed for fill or backfill
material as specified hereinafter or as shown on the drawings. Satisfactory soil shall contain no debris, waste,
frozen materials, vegetation, and other deleterious matter.
B. Unsatisfactory Materials: Materials which do not comply with the requirements for satisfactory materials are
unsatisfactory including materials classified in ASTM D 2487 soil classification groups, , OL, OH, and PT, or a
combination of these group symbols.
Unsatisfactory materials also include man-made fills; trash; refuse; backfills from previous construction; and
material classified as satisfactory which contains root and other organic matter or frozen material. The Contracting
Officer shall be notified of any contaminated materials.
Unsatisfactory soils also include satisfactory soils not maintained within -2 to +4 percent of optimum moisture
content at time of compaction.
1.5 SUBMITTALS
A. Submit certification that all material obtained from off-site sources complies with specification requirements.
B. Submit name of each material supplier and specific type and source of each material. Change in source throughout
project requires approval of Owner.
C. If fabrics or geogrids are to be used, design shall be submitted for approval to Owner.
D. Shop drawings or details pertaining to excavating and filling are not required unless otherwise shown on the
Drawings or if contrary procedures to Construction Documents are proposed.
E. Shop drawings or details pertaining to site utilities are not required unless required by regulatory authorities or
unless uses of materials, methods, equipment, or procedures that are contrary to The Drawings or Specifications
are proposed. Do not perform work until Owner has accepted required shop drawings.
F. Contact utility companies and determine if additional easements will be required to complete project. Provide
written confirmation of the status of all easements to Owner at time of Preconstruction Conference or no later than
90 days prior to project possession date.
PART 2 -PRODUCTS
A. Fill and Backfill. Satisfactory soil materials excavated from the site.
B. Imported Fill Material: Satisfactory borrow material has been identified within the project site at the proposed
reuse pond. Use of offsite borrow areas for embankment material is prohibited.
C. Trench Backfill: ASTM D 2321 unless otherwise specified or shown on the drawings.
D. Bedding: Aggregate Type as indicated on the plans or naturally or artificially graded mixture of natural or crushed
gravel, crushed stone, and natural or crushed sand; ASTM D 2940; except with 100 percent passing a 1-inch sieve
and not more than 8 percent passing a No. 200 sieve.
E. Drainage Fill: Washed, narrowly graded mixture of crushed stone, or crushed or uncrushed gravel; ASTM D 448;
coarse-aggregate grading Size 57; with 100 percent passing a 1-1/2- inch sieve and 0 to 5 percent passing a No. 8
sieve.
02300-2
-Governors Village Pond 03/27/06

F. Filter Material: Narrowly graded mixture of natural or crushed gravel, or crushed stone and natural sand;
ASTM D 448; coarse-aggregate grading Size 67; with 100 percent passing a I-inch sieve and 0 to 5 percent
passing a No. 4 sieve.
G. Topsoil: Topsoil shall consist of stripping material excavated from the site. Topsoil shall consist of organic
surficial soil found in depth of not more than 6-inches. Topsoil shall be as further defined in Section 02900 -
Planting
H. Filter and non woven drainage fabrics: Contech C-80NW or approved equivalent
2.2 EQUIPMENT
A. Transport off-site materials to project using well-maintained and operating vehicles. Once on site, transporting
vehicles shall stay on designated haul roads and shall at no time endanger improvements by rutting, overloading, or
pumping
2.3 SOURCE QUALITY CONTROL
A. Laboratory testing of materials proposed for use in the project shall be by the Independent Testing Laboratory at
no cost to Contractor. The Contractor shall provide samples of material obtained off-site.
B. Following tests shall be performed on each type of on-site or imported soil material used as compacted fill:
Moisture and Density Relationship: ASTM D 698 or ASTM D 1557.
Mechanical Analysis: AASHTO T 88 or ASTM D422.
Plasticity Index: ASTM D 4318
PART 3 -EXECUTION
3.1 PREPARATION
A. Identify required lines, levels, contours, datum, elevations, and grades necessary for construction as shown on the
drawings.
B. Notify utility companies to remove or relocate public utilities that are in conflict with proposed improvements.
C. Protect plant life, lawns, fences, existing structures, sidewalks, paving, and curbs, unless otherwise noted on the
drawings from excavating equipment and vehicular traffic.
D. Protect benchmarks, property corners, and other survey monuments from damage or displacement. If marker needs
to be removed it shall be referenced by licensed land surveyor and replaced, as necessary, by same.
E. Foundation Preparation. Site grading should initially begin with the removal of all vegetation and topsoil from
within the limits of the proposed axis of the new dam. The stripped materials may be wasted below normal pool on
the interior of the reservoir or be stockpiled for reuse in landscaping other portions of the project. Following
removal of all topsoil materials, the foundation of the dam should be proofrolled with a loaded dump truck or
similar piece of equipment under the observation of a geotechnical engineer to identify any areas needing
additional repair. Based on the results of the test borings, and a probe rod inspection of the dam axis performed
utilizing a half inch diameter steel probe rod, we anticipate that repair depths will not exceed about 12 to 24 inches
in most areas provided that site grading operations are conducted during the typically warmer and dryer summer
months. If the site is graded during the cooler and wetter winter months, we anticipate that the contractor will
encounter more significant areas of instability. Repairs at the bottom of the stream channel should be minimal since
hard silts are present near the base of the channel; however, some deeper repairs could be required along the bank
of the channel
02300-3
-Governors Village Pond 03/27/06
f
Prior to placement of the first lift of soil, the subgrade should be scarified, moisture conditioned as necessary, and a
thin lift of new fill placed prior to initial compaction. This procedure is recommended in order to provide for a less
distinctive boundary between the fill and virgin soil. In the event that permeable near surface soils are encountered
once site grading begins, consideration could be given to constructing a key trench at the foundation level near the
center of the dam. The borings do not indicate that a key trench will be needed; however, the foundation should be
inspected to verify these findings.
F. Maintain in operating condition existing utilities, previously installed utilities, and drainage systems encountered in
utility installation. Repair surface or subsurface improvements shown on The Drawings.
G. Verify location, size, elevation, and other pertinent data required making connections to existing utilities and
drainage systems as indicated on The Drawings.
H. Over excavate and properly prepare areas of subgrade that are not capable of supporting proposed systems.
Stabilize these areas by using acceptable geotextile fabrics or aggregate material placed and compacted as
specified by the geotechnical engineer.
I. Damages:
Contractor shall be responsible for and shall repair any damage to work in place, other contractor's equipment,
utilities, residences, highways, roads, railroads, private and municipal well systems, adjacent structures, natural
resources, habitat, existing wells, and the excavation. Contractor responsibility shall also include, damage to the
bottom due to heave and including but not limited to, removal and pumping out of the excavated area that may
result from Contractor's negligence, inadequate or improper design and operation of the dewatering system, and
any mechanical or electrical failure of the dewatering system.
Remove subgrade materials rendered unsuitable by excessive wetting and replace with approved backfill material
at no additional cost to the Owner.
3.2 TOPSOIL EXCAVATION
A. Cut heavy growths of grass from areas before stripping and remove cuttings with remainder of cleared vegetative
material.
B. Strip topsoil to a depth of not less than 6 inches from areas that are to be filled, excavated, landscaped, or
re-graded to such depth that it prevents intermingling with underlying subsoil or questionable material.
C. Stockpile topsoil in storage piles in areas shown on The Drawings or where directed by Owner. Construct storage
piles to freely drain surface water. Cover storage piles as required to prevent windblown dust. Dispose of
unsuitable topsoil as specified for waste material, unless otherwise specified by Owner. Remove excess topsoil
from embankment location and haul to golf course corridor as specified by Owner's Representative.
3.3 GENERAL EXCAVATION
A. Classification of Excavation: The Contractor shall assure himself by site investigation or other necessary means
that he is familiar with the type, quantity, quality, and character of excavation work to be performed. Excavation
shall be considered unclassified excavation.
B. When performing grading operations during periods of wet weather, provide adequate dewatering, drainage and
ground water management to control moisture of soils.
C. Shore, brace, and drain excavations as necessary to maintain excavation as safe, secure, and free of water at all
times.
D. Excavate embankment areas to line and grade as shown on the Drawings unless directed by Geotecnical Engineer.
E. Place suitable excavated material into project fill areas.
02300-4
-Governors Village Pond 03/27/06
F. Unsuitable excavated material shall be disposed on-site in manner and location that is acceptable to Owner and
local governing agencies.
G. Perform excavation using capable, well-maintained equipment and methods acceptable to Owner and local
governing agencies.
3.4 TRENCHING EXCAVATION FOR UTILITIES
A. Contract local utility companies before excavation begins. Dig trench at proper width and depth for laying pipe,
conduit, or cable. Cut trench banks vertical, if possible, and remove stones from bottom of trench as necessary to
avoid point-bearing. Over excavate wet or unstable soil, if encountered, from trench bottom as necessary to
provide suitable base for continuous and uniform bedding. Replace overexcavation with suitable and dispose of
unsuitable material.
B. Trench excavation sidewalls shall be sloped, shored, sheeted, braced, or otherwise supported by means of sufficient
strength to protect workmen in accordance with applicable rules and regulations established for construction by the
Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and by local ordinances. Lateral
travel distance to exit ladder or steps shall not be greater than 25 feet in trenches 4 feet or deeper.
C. Perform trench excavation. as indicated on the Drawings for specified depths. During excavation, stockpile
materials suitable for backfilling in orderly manner far enough from bank of trench to avoid overloading, slides, or
cave-ins.
D. Remove excavated materials not required or not suitable for backfill or embankments and waste off-site or at on-
site locations approved by the Owner and in accordance with governing regulations.
E. Prevent surface water from flowing into trenches or other excavations by temporary grading or other methods, as
required. Remove accumulated water in trenches and other excavations as specified.
F. Open cut excavation with trenching machine or backhoe. Where machines other than ladder or wheel-type
trenching machines are used, do not use clods for backfill.
G. Accurately grade trench bottom to provide uniform bearing and support for each section of pipe on bedding
material at every point along entire length.
H. Trench width below top of pipe shall not be less than 12 inches nor more than 18 inches wider than outside surface
of pipe or conduit that is to be installed to designated elevations and grades. Other trench width for pipe, conduit,
or cable shall be least practical width that will allow for proper compaction of trench backfill.
3.5 SUBGRADE PREPARATION
A. Scarification and Compaction: Areas exposed by excavation or stripping and on which subgrade preparations are
to be performed shall be scarified to minimum depth of 8 inches and compacted as specified hereinafter.
B. Proofrolling: Subgrades shall be proofrolled to detect areas of insufficient compaction. Proofrolling shall be
accomplished by making minimum of 2 complete passes with fully-loaded tandem-axle dump truck with a
maximum weight of 20 tons, or approved equal, in each of 2 perpendicular directions while under the supervision
and direction of the Geotechnical Engineer. Document and explain proofrolling inspection procedures and results
in the laboratory inspection report. Areas of failure shall be excavated and recompacted. Subgrade exposed longer
than 48 hours or on which precipitation has occurred shall be re-proofrolled.
3.6 * FILLING
A. Fill areas to contours and elevations shown on the Drawings with unfrozen materials.
Place fills in continuous 6-8" lifts with exception to backfill around structures noted below. No fill shall
be placed on any part of the embankment foundation until the area to be covered has been inspected and
02300-5
-Governors Village Pond 03/27/06
e' +
approved. The distribution of materials shall be such that the embankment will be free from lenses,
pockets, streaks, and layers of material differing substantially in texture or gradation from the surrounding
material. Materials shall be spread in layers of uniform thickness. Unless otherwise directed, the thickness
of layers before compaction shall be not more than 8 inches. Compaction of each layer shall be conducted
in a systematic and continuous manner so as to ensure the specified coverage.
B. Rolling shall be done parallel to the axis of the dam wherever possible. The embankment shall be brought up in
layers such that the surface is essentially level at all times, except for a slight slope for drainage.
C. Fill within proposed embankment subgrade shall not contain rock or stone greater than 6 inches in any dimension.
D. Fill materials used in preparation of subgrade shall be placed in lifts or layers not to exceed 8 inches loose measure
and compacted as specified hereinafter.
E. Extreme care shall be taken while backfilling against box culverts. Backfill adjacent to pipes or structures shall be
of the type and quality conforming to that specified for the adjoining fill material. The fill shall be placed in
horizontal layers not to exceed four inches in thickness and compacted by hand tampers or other manually directed
compaction equipment. The material needs to fill completely all spaces under and adjacent to the pipe. At no time
during the backfilling operation shall driven equipment be allowed to operate closer than four feet, measured
horizontally, to any part of a structure. Under no circumstances shall equipment be driven over any part of a
concrete structure or pipe, unless there is a compacted fill of 24" or greater over the structure or pipe.
F. The movement of the hauling and spreading equipment over the fill shall be controlled so that the entire surface of
each lift shall be traversed by not less than one tread track of heavy equipment or compaction shall be achieved by
a minimum of four complete passes of a sheepsfoot, rubber tired or vibratory roller. Fill material shall contain
sufficient moisture such that the required degree of compaction will be obtained with the equipment used. The fill
material shall contain sufficient moisture so that if formed into a ball it will not crumble, yet not be so wet that
water can be squeezed out.
3.7 PIPE BEDDING
A. Box Culverts shall be placed upon compacted subgrade. The subgrade shall be compacted to a minimum 95% of
the standard Proctor ( maximum dry density ).
B. Place geotextile fabrics in locations as specified on the Drawings.
3.8 TRENCH BACKFILLING
A. Materials used for trench backfill shall comply with requirements as specified herein.
B. Backfill and compact in accordance with fill and compaction requirements in accordance with ASTM D 2321
unless otherwise shown on the drawings.
C. Do not backfill trenches until required tests are performed and utility systems comply with and are accepted by
applicable governing authorities.
D. Backfill trenches to contours and elevations shown on the Drawings.
E. Do not backfill over porous, wet, frozen, or spongy subgrade surfaces.
02300-6
-Governors Village Pond 03/27/06
3.9 COMPACTION
A. Compact as follows:
Location
Subgrade & Fill
B.
C.
i
D.
3.10
Percent of Maximum Laboratory Density
ASTM D698 ASTM D 1557
95 N/A
Maintain moisture content of not less than 2 percent below optimum moisture content of fill materials to attain
required compaction density.
Exercise proper caution when compacting immediately over top of pipes or conduits. Water jetting or flooding is
not permitted as method of compaction.
Corrective Measures for Non-Complying Compaction: Remove and recompact deficient areas until proper
compaction is obtained or as directed by Geotechnical Engineer.
MAINTENANCE OF SUBGRADE
A. Verify finished subgrades to ensure proper elevation and conditions for construction above subgrade.
B. Protect.subgrade from excessive wheel loading during construction, including concrete trucks, dump trucks, and
other construction equipment.
C. Remove areas of finished subgrade found to have insufficient compaction density to depth necessary and replace in
manner that will comply with compaction requirements by use of material with CBR or LBR equal to or better than
that specified on the drawings. Surface of subgrade after compaction shall be firm, uniform, smooth, stable, and
true to grade and cross-section.
D. Construct temporary ditches and perform such grading as necessary to maintain positive drainage away from
subgrade at all times.
i
3.11 BORROW AND SPOIL SITES
A. Comply with NPDES and local erosion control permitting requirements for any and all on-site and off-site,
disturbed spoil and borrow areas. Upon completion of spoil or borrow operations, clean up spoil or borrow areas
in a neat and reasonable manner to the satisfaction of Owner or off-site property owner, if applicable.
3.12 FINISH GRADING
A. Check grading of building subgrades by string line from grade stakes (blue tops) set at not more than 50-foot
centers. Allowable tolerance shall be plus or minus 0.10 feet from plan grade. Provide engineering and field
staking as necessary for verification of lines, grades, and elevations.
B. Grade areas where finish grade elevations or contours are indicated on the Drawings, other than paved areas and
buildings, including excavated areas, filled and transition areas, and landscaped areas. Graded areas shall be
uniform and smooth, free from rock, debris, or irregular surface changes. Ground surfaces shall vary uniformly
between indicated elevations. Grade finished ditches to allow for proper drainage without ponding and in manner
that will minimize erosion potential. For topsoil, sodding, and seeding requirements refer to seeding schedule on
construction drawings.
C. Correct settled and eroded areas within 1 year after date of completion at no additional expense to Owner. Bring
grades to proper elevation.
02300-7
-Governors Village Pond
03/27/06
3.13 FIELD TESTING
A. Field density tests for in-place materials will be performed by the Owner's Independent Testing Laboratory (ITL)
as follows:
During actual construction, density tests should be performed at the rate of one test per 5,000 to 10,000 square feet
of fill material placed per lift. The field compaction control should be provided on a full-time basis to identify any
potential problem areas. Additionally, compaction should be achieved with a trapezoidal wedge foot type
compactor such as a CAT 815 or with a sheep's foot compactor to minimize the potential for developing seepage
paths through the new embankment fill. As the fill is placed, rolling can be performed perpendicular to the axis of
the dam in order to tie the new fill into existing grade. Fill materials may be placed at moisture contents 2% dry of
optimum to the maximum percentage wet of optimum which will still allow achievement of required compaction
and sufficient stability to allow obtainment of compaction with subsequent lifts. All fill soils should be compacted
to a minimum of 95% of the standard Proctor maximum dry density.
B. Corrective Measures For Non-Complying Compaction: Remove and recompact deficient areas until proper
compaction is obtained at no additional expense to Owner. Adjust moisture content as necessary to conform to the
requirements of this section.
END OF SECTION
02300-8
-Governors Village Pond 03/27/06
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
GOVERNORS VILLAGE COMMERCIAL, LLC
GOVERNORS POND
MODIFICATIONS
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
S&EC Project No. 9325.W1
March 2006
ELECTRONIC COPY- NO SIGNATURE
Patrick K. Smith, P.E.
NC License No. 25525
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 + Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 1 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.... 2
4.10 STORM WATER WETLAND PLANTING ........... 4
1.1 SECTION INCLUDES .......................................2
1.2 SUMMARY OF WORK .....................................2
1.3 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT ....................2
SECTION 2 - QUALITY CONTROL .................2
2.1 SECTION INCLUDES .......................................2
2.2 PLANTING OBSERVATION ..............................2
SECTION 3 - BACKFILLING AND SURFACE
PREPARATION ............................................3
3.1 SECTION INCLUDES .......................................3
3.2 PLANTING PREPARATION ...............................3
i
SECTION 4 - WETLAND PLANTING .............. 3
4.1 SECTION INCLUDES ........................................ 3
4.2 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT ..................... 3
4.3 REFERENCES ................................................... 3
4.4 GENERAL ........................................................ 3
4.5 BALL & BURLAP TREES ................................... 4
4.6 CONTAINER GROWN PLANTS .......................... 4
4.7 BARE ROOT PLANTS ....................................... 4
4.8 PLANT SUBSTITUTION .................................... 4
4.9 PLANTING PREPARATION ...............................4
4.11 EMERGENT AND AQUATIC PLANTINGS ......... 5
4.12REMOVAL OF NUISANCE VEGETATION.......... 5
4.13PLANTING PERIOD .......................................... 5
4.14WATER FOR PLANTINGS ................................. 5
4.15SUBMITTALS .................................................. 5
SECTION 5 - PERMANENT SEEDING ........... . 6
5.1 SECTION INCLUDES ........................................ 6
5.2 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT ..................... 6
5.3 REFERENCES .................................................. 6
5.4 GENERAL ....................................................... 6
5.5 SEEDBED PREPARATION ................................ 6
5.6 SEEDING ......................................................... 6
5.7 SEEDING DATES ............................................. 6
5.8 SOIL AMENDMENTS ....................................... 6
5.9 MULCH ........................................................... 6
SECTION 6- SITE MAINTENANCE ................. 7
6.1 SECTION INCLUDES ........................................ 7
6.2 EXECUTION .................................................... 7
S&EC Project No. 9325.W 1 Technical Specifications
Governors Pond Modifications 1 March 2006
SECTION 1 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
1.1 SECTION INCLUDES
General requirements and information related to the work including
summary of work, measurement and payment, and reference to
SPECIAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS.
1.2 SUMMARY OF WORK
i
The Governors Pond Modifications project consists of the construction
of an Extended Detention Storm Water Wetland to treat storm water
runoff from existing and proposed site facilities. This storm water
wetland is a permanent storm water treatment device, consisting of a
low earthen embankment, an outlet flow control structure (with
associated appurtenances), and wetland planting (tree, shrub, and
herbaceous). These Technical Specifications relate to the planting
component of this project. Refer to the contract Drawings and to these
Specifications for project details.
1.3 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT
All measurement and payment for services performed shall be as
indicated in the SPECIAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS. As such, they
are not defined in these Technical Specifications.
END OF SECTION
SECTION 2 - QUALITY CONTROL
2.1 SECTION INCLUDES
Observation of wetland planting including the installation of tree,
shrub, and herbaceous species and emergent marsh planting.
2.2 PLANTING OBSERVATION
The Owner will arrange and pay for an independent (or contracted)
environmental consultant to observe wetland planting (including
emergent marsh) as required in these Specifications. Reports (if
required) will be submitted concurrently to the Engineer, Owner, and
Contractor, documenting observations indicating compliance or
non-compliance with Contract Documents.
Observation of planting operations does not relieve Contractor of
obligation to perform Work to contract requirements. The Contractor
shall allow observation personnel access to plant materials (see wetland
plantings specified in SECTION 4) prior to and during planting
operations, and the construction site as required.
Observer or Contractor shall not have the authority to alter planting or
other parts of the work. Changes may only be made by written change
order approved by the Owner.
END OF SECTION
S&EC Project No. 9325.W 1 Technical Specifications
Governors Pond Modifications 2 March 2006
SECTION 3 - BACKFILLING AND SURFACE PREPARATION
3.1 SECTION INCLUDES
Specifications for Backfilling as it relates to seedbed preparation.
3.2 PLANTING PREPARATION
Areas where storm water wetland planting will be performed will be
backfilled to final grade with topsoil or other suitable material (deemed
of sufficient quality by the Engineer) as described in this section.
Earth fill in areas where wetlands will be constructed shall be placed so
as to meet the following additional requirements:
1. Stockpiled topsoil shall be evenly distributed to a depth sufficient
to obtain the final grade as shown on the Drawings. Topsoil depth
I shall be a minimum of 12 inches across the entire planting area.
2. The distribution of materials throughout each zone shall be
essentially uniform and the fill shall be free from material
differing substantially in texture or gradation from the surrounding
materials.
3. Backfill areas to contours and elevations with unfrozen materials.
Employ a placement method that does not disturb or damage
other work. Place backfill and fill in loose level lifts not to exceed
twelve inches in thickness. Make gradual grade changes. Blend
slope into level areas. Slope grade minimum 2 inches in 10 feet,
unless noted otherwise.
4. All areas where topsoil is distributed shall be disked or harrowed
to ensure soil aeration and to increase the surface roughness prior
to planting or seeding.
5. Micro-topographic grading shall be performed as directed by
Engineer to develop the desired variation within the specified
planting zones.
END OF SECTION
SECTION 4 - WETLAND PLANTING
4.1 SECTION INCLUDES
Provide all necessary equipment and labor to implement planting plan.
4.2 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT
See SPECIAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS
4.3 REFERENCES
The Baily Hortorium (1976 MacMillan Publishing Co., Inc.)
American Standard for Nursery Stock, latest edition
NCDENR - Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design
Manual
15 NCAC 213.200 - Classification of Water Quality Standards
Applicable to Surface Waters & Wetlands of North Carolina
The following Specifications and methods form a part of this
specification:
NCDOT - Standard Specifications for Roads and Structures.
When the Specifications or Drawings differ from the requirements of
the above-referenced documents, the more stringent requirements shall
apply.
4.4 GENERAL
All plants shall be as called for by these Specifications. Ball and
Burlap (B&B) plants shall be used as specified for all wetland
specimen tree species. Container grown plants (including 1-gallon and
3-gallon containers) shall be used as specified for the remaining
wetland tree and shrub species as described in the planting plan. Plugs,
bare roots or tuber/rhizomes shall be used as specified for herbaceous
(including emergent marsh and aquatic marsh) species. Bare rooted
plants may be used in lieu of container grown plants provided written
approval for such use has been obtained from the Engineer.
Grading of plants, type, and minimum dimensions of plant or container
size shall conform to the Specifications contained in the latest edition
of American Standard for Nursery Stock. Plants shall not be cut back
from larger sizes to meet sizes called for on the plans. Botanical names
referred to in the plans are taken from "Hortus Third", the Baily
Hortorium (1976 MacMillan Publishing Co., Inc.). All plants delivered
shall be true to name. Each plant, or group of the same species,
variety, and size of plant, shall be legibly tagged with the name and
size of the plant.
All plants shall be first-class representatives of their species. The root
system shall be vigorous and well-developed. The branch systems
shall be of normal development, and free from disfiguring knots, sun
scald injuries, abrasions of the bark, dead or dry wood, broken terminal
growth, or other objectionable disfigurements. Trees shall have
reasonably straight stems, and shall be well branched and symmetrical
in accordance with their natural habits of growth.
All plants shall be free from plant diseases and insect pests. All
shipments of plants shall comply with all nursery inspection and plant
quarantine regulations of the states of origin and destination, as well as
S&EC Project No. 9325.W 1 Technical Specifications
Governors Pond Modifications 3 March 2006

with Federal regulations governing interstate movement of nursery
stock. If nursery stock from other states is used, the stock shall be
accompanied by a tag or certificate stating, in effect, that the nursery
stock has been inspected and certified by an authorized official of the
state of origin as apparently free from injurious plant pests.
All plants shall be subject to inspection at any time by the Owner,
Engineer, or a party to be named by the Owner. Any such inspection
before or during planting operations, however shall not be construed as
final acceptance of the plants involved.
4.5 BALL & BURLAP TREES
4.8 PLANT SUBSTITUTION
No change in the specified plants (species, variety, size, caliper,
furnish, etc.) will be made without written approval of the Engineer.
All requests by the Contractor for substitutions shall be presented in
writing and shall include a listing of the sources which have been
contacted in an attempt to secure the specified plant material. Requests
for substitutions shall include botanical name, common name, size,
caliper, and furnish description of the proposed substitute. No increase
in compensation will be made to the Contractor as a result of the use of
the approved substitute plants.
Ball and burlap (B&B) plants shall be healthy, vigorous, and well-
rooted in the wrapped soil component The plant diameter (caliper)
shall be of the size shown on the planting plan or larger, and shall be
wrapped in a sufficiently tight form to firmly hold the soil protecting
the root during transporting, handling, and planting, and the soil shall
not be allowed to become frozen.
The planting stock for B&B trees should be grown by nurseries within
the same physiographic province of North Carolina within 200 miles of
the project site. Plant stock may be obtained from nurseries beyond the
200-mile limit with the approval of the Engineer. All B&B trees shall
have a 2.5 -inch minimum caliper stem and show no signs of recent
stress. Larger trees are allowable at the discretion of the Engineer and
will be provided and installed at no additional cost to the Owner.
4.6 CONTAINER GROWN PLANTS
All containerized trees shall be nursery grown in 1-gallon pots
(minimum) and show no signs of recent stress. All containerized
shrubs shall be nursery grown in 1-gallon (minimum) and 3-gallon pots
(minimum for Specimen plantings) and show no signs of recent stress.
Container grown plants shall be healthy, vigorous, well-rooted, and
shall have become established in the container in which they are
delivered. These plants shall have been in the established container
long enough for the fibrous roots to have developed so that the root
mass will retain its shape and hold together when removed from the
container. The container shall be of the size shown on the planting
plan or larger, sufficiently rigid to firmly hold the soil protecting the
root during transporting, handling, and planting, and the soil shall not
be allowed to become frozen.
The planting stock for container vegetation should be grown by
nurseries within the Piedmont or Coastal Plain physiographic province
of North Carolina within 200 miles of the project site. Plant stock may
be obtained from nurseries beyond the 200-mile limit with the approval
of the Engineer.
4.7 BARE ROOT PLANTS
Bare root plants, if approved for use by the Engineer, shall have a
heavy fibrous root system which has been developed by proper cultural
treatment. They shall be dug, packaged, transported, and handled in a
manner that will prevent injury to or drying out of the trunks, branches,
or roots, or freezing of the roots.
The planting stock for bare root vegetation should be grown by
nurseries within the Piedmont or Coastal Plain physiographic province
of North Carolina within 200 miles of the project site. Plant stock may
be obtained from nurseries beyond the 200-mile limit with the approval
of the Engineer.
4.9 PLANTING PREPARATION
In areas where storm water wetland planting will be implemented,
preparation for planting operations shall be as described in SECTION
5.6 (Planting Preparation) of these Specifications.
Where B&B and container grown plants will be planted, holes made in
preparation for tree and shrub species planting shall be as shown on
construction plans and on the details.
Where bare root plants shall be planted in holes made by neatly
punching a hole into existing grade with a dibble bar, (a heavy metal
tool with a blade and a foot petal), the dimensions of the hole shall not
exceed 3" in any direction.
4.10 STORM WATER WETLAND PLANTING
Where storm water wetland planting is directed, areas shall be planted
with container grown or bare root seedlings of tree, shrub, and
herbaceous species as shown on construction plans. Planting shall be
spaced as shown on the plans. Specimen tree and shrub species shall
be installed as located on the planting plan unless otherwise directed by
the Engineer at the time of construction.
Site wetland planting is divided into three (3) specific zones as shown
on the Planting Plan for tree, shrub and herbaceous plantings. These
zones include Deep Water Planting, Saturated Planting, and Slope
Planting zones. These planting consist of bare roots, plugs, and I-
gallon containerized plants.
Specimen trees and shrub species including B&B trees and 3-gallon
containerized shrubs have been specifically located for installation
across the storm water wetland.
Ball and Burlap (B&B) Plants
No planting shall be done when the temperature is below 327, when
soil to be excavated for the plant hole is frozen, when the sides or
bottom of the plant hole are frozen, or when the soil to be used for
backftlling is frozen or too wet. In digging, loading, transporting,
unloading, planting, or otherwise handling plants, the Contractor shall
exercise utmost care and use adequate precautions to prevent injury to
or drying out of the trunk, branches, or roots as well as prevent freezing
of the plant roots.
The planting hole or trench shall be deep and wide enough to permit
roots to spread out and down without J-rooting and be at least two
times the diameter of the rootball taking care not to plant the tree too
deeply. The rootball shall be placed on solid soil and not loose
backfill. Topsoil and subsoil shall be kept separate during excavation.
Soil shall be replaced around the tree and tamped to eliminate air
pockets. Fill the hole in stages, starting with topsoil and adding subsoil
S&EC Project No. 9325.W 1
Governors Pond Modifications
Technical Specifications
March 2006
near the top. A 5- to 6- inch layer of organic mulch must be placed on
the soil surface around the plant. The plant stem should be upright
upon completion of installation. Trees over five feet tall will require
staking. At a minimum the upper one-third of the burlap shall be
removed and disposed of.
The holes for the B&B trees must not be dug more than a few hours in
advance of planting since it may fill with water preventing planting. If
the hole fills with water during digging, the site is too wet and tree
roots will `drown'. Planting should be delayed until conditions
improve. In addition, leaving a hole overnight may cause frost to build
up in the hole that can damage newly planted tree roots.
Containerized Plants
No planting shall be done when the temperature is below 32°F, when
soil to be excavated for the plant hole is frozen, when the sides or
bottom of the plant hole are frozen, or when the soil to be used for
backfilling is frozen or too wet. In digging, loading, transporting,
unloading, planting, or otherwise handling plants, the Contractor shall
exercise utmost care and use adequate precautions to prevent injury to
or drying out of the trunk, branches, or roots as well as prevent freezing
of the plant roots. Container vegetation must always be handled by the
container and never by the tops of the plants.
Installation of container vegetation shall be located in designated areas
as described in the plans and as directed by the Designer. Soil in the
area of planting shall be loosened to a depth no less than the height of
the container. Container vegetation can be planted in holes made by a
shovel or other means that meet the approval of the Designer. Hoedads
and dibble bars may not be used. The container shall be properly
disposed of.
Container stock shall be planted in a vertical position with the root
collar approximately 0.5 inches below the soil surface. The planting
trench or hole shall be deep and wide enough to permit roots to spread
out and down without J-rooting. After planting, the soil shall be
tamped firmly to eliminate air pockets. A 3- to 4-inch layer of organic
mulch must then be placed on the soil surface around the plant.
General
Planting records shall be maintained by the Installer to ensure
appropriate size and percentage of each plant species as described in
the Planting Schedule. Record of nursery or provider shall be
maintained for all plant material. Planting records shall be provided to
the Engineer and Owner upon completion of planting installation.
Unless specifically described on the Planting Plan (as shown for
Specimen Plantings), tree, shrub and herbaceous plantings shall be
randomly intermixed across the Deep Water, Saturated, and Slope
planting zones.
Care should be taken to avoid planting forest species too deep or too
shallow, and to avoid damage to root systems during planting. Planting
depth should be in accordance with listed references, supplier
recommendations, and planting details.
4.11 EMERGENT AND AQUATIC PLANTINGS
Where herbaceous emergent marsh and aquatic marsh planting is
directed, areas shall be planted with plugs, bare roots, tubers/rhizomes
of selected plant species as shown on construction plans. Stems shall
be planted at spacing shown on Drawings.
S&EC Project No. 9325.W I
Governors Pond Modifications
All plants will be installed in accordance with the recommendations of
the supplying nursery. If not planted immediately upon delivery to the
job site, the plant material shall be stored out of direct exposure to the
sun and wind and they shall be protected by covering with straw, peat
moss, compost, or other suitable materials and shall be kept moist,
through periodic watering, until the time of planting.
Where plugs. bare roots, and tubers/rhizomes planting is directed,
plants shall be placed in shallow holes so that only sprouts are showing
above the soil. Care should be taken to avoid planting species too deep
or too shallow, and to avoid damage to root systems during planting.
Planting depth should be in accordance with listed references and
supplier recommendations.
4.12 REMOVAL OF NUISANCE VEGETATION
Removal or control of nuisance vegetation shall be performed for a
period of 90 days as necessary to ensure adequate survival of specified
plant species. See SPECIAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS.
4.13 PLANTING PERIOD
The timing of the installation of all plant material onsho shall be
coordinated with the Owner and the Designer.
4.14 WATER FOR PLANTINGS
The contractor shall install a rain gage and collect daily gage readings
at the site. Contractor shall provide initial watering on the day of
planting and thereafter at a minimum rate of 1" per week (including
rainfall) for a period of 90 days. Water used in the planting or care of
vegetation and plantings shall meet the requirements of Class C fresh
waters as defined in 15 NAC 213.200. See SPECIAL CONTRACT
PROVISIONS.
4.15 SUBMITTALS
Contractor shall submit purchase certificates (or other proof) of all
species planted.
END OF SECTION
Technical Specifications
March 2006

SECTION 5 - PERMANENT SEEDING
5.1 SECTION INCLUDES
Permanent seeding for permanent site stabilization.
5.2 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT
See SPECIAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS
5.3 REFERENCES
The following Specifications and methods form a part of this
specification:
Newly constructed embankment and other disturbed areas indicated on
plans:
Species
Reed Canary Grass
(Phalaris arundinacea)
Switch Grass
(Panicum virgatum)
Mulch
Grain Straw
NCDENR - Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design
I Manual
When the Specifications or Drawings differ from the requirements of
the above-referenced documents, the more stringent requirements shall
apply.
5.4 GENERAL
Permanent seeding shall be executed in temporary lined areas and all
other areas which are disturbed during construction activities. In areas
where Erosion Control Matting will be installed (if described elsewhere
in the project specifications), seedbed preparation and seeding shall be
performed prior to the placement of erosion control matting.
5.5 SEEDBED PREPARATION
Complete grading before top soiling or preparing seedbeds. Avoid
creating steep slopes. Areas where seeding will occur on exposed
finished grade shall be disked or harrowed to ensure soil aeration and
to increase the surface roughness prior to planting.
Apply lime (at 1 tons per acre) and 10-10-10 fertilizer (at 1,400 pounds
per acre) evenly across seedbed and work into the top 4-6 inches of soil
by discing or other suitable means. Operate machinery on the contour.
Rework the surface if soil becomes compacted or crusted prior to
seeding. Complete seedbed preparation by breaking up large clods and
raking into a smooth, uniform surface. Fill in or level depressions that
can collect water.
5.6 SEEDING
Apply permanent seeding to seedbed after preparation is complete.
Use certified seed for permanent seeding whenever possible. Certified
seed is inspected by the North Carolina Crop Improvement
Association. It meets published North Carolina Standards and should
bear an official "Certified Seed" label.
Broadcast seed into a freshly loosened seedbed that has not been settled
by rainfall. Mulch must be used on slopes 4H:1 V or steeper and in
areas when concentrated water may flow. Anchor mulch with netting
in areas subject to concentrated flow. In areas with Erosion Control
Matting will be installed, no mulch shall be used and erosion control
matting shall be placed within 24 hours of seeding. Apply seeds and
mulch at the rates indicated below.
5.7 SEEDING DATES
Rate (Ibs/acre)
25
25
Rate Rbs/acre)
4000
(2 bales per 1000 square feet)
Seeding dates given in these seeding Specifications have the best
probability of success.
BEST
15 Feb-15 Mar
POSSIBLE
1 Dec-15 May
Seeding shall be completed within the "possible" range of dates.
5.8 SOIL AMENDMENTS
Apply lime and fertilizer according to soil tests, or apply 1 tons/acre
ground agricultural limestone and 1,4001b/acre 10-10-10 fertilizer.
5.9 MULCH
Apply grain straw, or equivalent cover of another suitable mulcting
material as described above. Anchor mulch by tacking with asphalt,
roving, or netting. Netting shall be used on slopes steeper than 2H:1 V.
END OF SECTION
S&EC Project No. 9325.W I Technical Specifications
Governors Pond Modifications 6 March 2006

SECTION 6- SITE MAINTENANCE
6.1 SECTION INCLUDES
Site maintenance to ensure vigorous vegetative cover and vegetative
success.
6.2 EXECUTION
Contractor shall revisit the site as required in the special contract
provisions to inspect the condition of the project site. Areas of poor
vegetative cover, displaced or damaged trees, shrubs, and herbaceous
species shall be repaired. Site visits shall be coordinated with Owner.
Erosion areas shall be filled and reseeded in accordance with
SECTION 5 - Permanent Seeding. Areas of poor vegetative cover
shall be reseeded and refertilized only.
Displaced, damaged, or dead plant species shall be removed, and
replanted in accordance with SECTION 4 - Wetland Planting.
END OF SECTION
S&EC Project No. 9325.W I Technical Specifications
Governors Pond Modifications 7 March 2006
v 11- v
OPEN PLANTING PLACE BARE-ROOT CLOSE HOLE WITH
HOLE WITH SEEDLING IN HOLE - SHOVEL OR AUGER -
SHOVEL, AUGER, OR ROOT COLLAR AT NO AIR SPACE
DIBBLE BAR SURFACE AROUND ROOTS
BARE-ROOT 5EEDLING PLANTING DETAIL
(NOT TO SCALE)
MULCH 80mm (31 AVG. THICKNE55.
NON-BIODEGRADABLE
MATERIAL SHALL BE TOTALLY REMOVED.
GENTLY COMPACTED TOPSOIL MIXTURE
TAMPED ADMD(TUKE BACKFILL
5HRUD PLANTING - CONTAINERIZED DETAIL
(NOT TO SCALE)
P J. NO.: 5CALE: 15HEET TITLE:
9325.W1 NO SCALE PLANTING DETAILS II
•
PROD. MGR.: PROJECT:
PK5 GOVERNOR'S VILLAGE Soil & Environmental Coasult:ats, PA
DRAWN Cws GOVERNOR'S POND MODIFICATIONS 1101Ph Raven 9?94x?a • Raleigh =(9 0 27614
2 OF 2 CHATHAM CTY, NC CLIENT: CE GROUP, INC. www.SandEC.com
m
rv :nccvixa
TREE TAPE (3), AVOID TIGHT TAPING AS IT
PREVENT5 NATURAL SWAY
CROWN OF ROOT BALL 5HALL BE 5ET 5UGHTLY ABOVE GRADE.
MULCH: (4'-67 AVG. THICKNE55
5TAKES (3)
WIRE OR ROPES AT TOP OF BALL 511ALL BE CUT.
REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF BURLAP.
PREPARED ADMIXTURE BACKFILL OR NATIVE 501L
TAMPED ADMIXTURE BACKFILL
TREE PLANTING - BALL * BURLAP DETAIL
(NOT TO 5CALE)
CROWN OF ROOT BALL 5HALL BE 5ET 5LIGHTLY ABOVE GRADE.
MULCH: (3'-51 AVG. THICKNE55
PREPARED ADMIXTURE BACKFILL OR NATIVE 501L
TAMPED ADMIXTURE BACKFILL
TREE PLANTING - CONTAINERIZED DETAIL
(NOT TO SCALE)
PROD. NO.: 5CALE: SHEET TITLE:
9325.W1 NO SCALE PLANTING DETAILS I
•
PROD. MGR.: PROJECT:
PK5 GOVERNOR'5 VILLAGE Soil & Environmental Consulbtats, PA
DRAWN: GOVERNOR'S POND MODIFICATIONS 11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
CW 3 Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
SHE CLIENT: www.SandEC.com
1 OF 2 JLU` CHATHAM CTY, NC CE GROUP, INC.
Design Calculations and Work Sheets
FOR
GOVERNORS VILLAGE POND DAM
MODIFICATION
CHATHAM COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
March 2006
C,e Crou
mc.
LAND USE E?/ALUATION
CI\/I L ENGI NE: E: 21 NG
CONSTKUCTION MANAGEMENT
11000 Regency Parkway, 5uite 4 10
Cary, NC 275 1 1
Voice [phone] - fax [phone]
1?
PROJECT SUMMARY:
The proposed rev151on5 include modification of an ex15tmg 4 AC wet pond that provides a temporary storage pool for
the 0.5" storm event. The current pond lacks a forebay and littoral shelf. In response to the recent 401 approval for
the protect, modifications to improve the water quality performance are enclosed. The existing pond will be divided into
an upper and lower pond.
The upper pond will be an extended detention wetland acting also a5 a forebay for the lower wet pond. The extended
detention wetland basin has been Sized to the largest available volume given existing Site con5tramt5. Patrick 5mith with
S*EC has prepared a gradmg plan for the wetland ba5m providmg small forebay5 at all 5tormwater entry points.
Variation of elevation within the wetland basin has been provided to accommodate a wide range of plant 5peae5. S*EC
has also prepared a detailed planting plan with 5peufication5.
The lower pond has been redesigned to meet the surface area / dramage area and temporary pool requirement5 for
the I " storm event. The existing Spillway has been analyzed and determined to be acceptable with the exception of the
drawdown orifice which. will be mcrea5ed from 4 - G" in Size. A 10' littoral shelf has also been provided. There 15 one
ex15tmg dramage outfall from a 5ingle family re5idential phase that d15charge5 directly into the wet pond. A rip rap or
gabien Iforebay has been provided for th15 lone outfall. The remainder of the watershed 15 directed into the extended
wetland first.
2
....._... ...... _.-'---•-'.'"... J.e" yr-'"`_. / it rl ...--"°".. _ -• dAV .. (.°`^-^'.f.'..•'«.-..?',?-?? ,. \``w? \
WATERIII t~ s, a
81 A ) r` '` '' } 1 BOUNDARY

v d r I
1

t J
a?"
-HO EL

CEIfT DEVE
f?A
?
ttt

DUKJFVEEK80FFIC

E
FUTURE
PARCEL
2.3 AC a
i
l ` I 0 al+
4 UT PAR
e I , 1.0 AC
\ 4
aw \ \, `
/ I
FU
RE
P LO
1
4. A RE
e `
spy, ' `\ ' Y

r
?
- FOOD L -.-...._ . ti ? ......,,? / ?. ;1., ?.
?

APB m
Po4
r
?
- { 1 / f
f ? ? 1 1 a

?
99?
1
5
+4

4
1 y ?. x
Q i - r` w,
`, + RE1 4P
.w
:
r"'
EL
245

/
• r•"•r '{ \y ?? ?
:, it ' ! ^?`,1„? ?••?

D PME 7\4
r ?" I \

\ PHASE 2 LOTS 0o each 4600 Par La 5.90 acres
'' •^ ------ \\\ , •? °'"""" FUTURE PHASe S LOT61 40 emote a730 420 can
.? APARTMENTS 1.07 saes 1 1.07 rams
DUKE WEEKS OFFICE 8.60 sores 1 8.08 saw
ROADS THROUGHOUT PROJECT 18.20 was 1 1820 sae.
FOOD LION 4.44 sores 1 4.44 morn
FOOD LION OUT PARCEL 1.1 more 0.0 0.00 maw
80
%
FUTURE OUT PARCEL C 2,3 case 0.8 1.84 maw
FUTURE OUT PARCEL D 42 man 0.6 8.96 maw 60%
~
% f SIDEWALK 22684 Il 8 2.60 so=
TRAIL 2620 I.i. 10 0.80 saw
~
\ F SPILLWAY 0.22 mores 1 0.22 male
fd r ' `? ;.? .! r EXISTING TOWNHOMES 3.06 mare 1 8.08 acre
66
acres
FUTURE TOWNHOMU 2.66 acres 1 2.
ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT 8.48 ease 1 6.48 acres
6
0.88 San
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA
t
\ ?
w r "
5
r
f ! ! TOT TE(28HED 148.64 saw
1 VIOUS 42,2
EXHIBIT MAP B (TOPOGRAPtiY)
s ?•
I
,
k Group
r
,.
,
Project Area Draining to ?1.
Existing Stormwater Pond- N o PLAN N I N G
SCALE: 1aa ?,300a ? -" IVIL ENGINEERING
-- CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
NORTH March 2006 1? ;,` ,.5 r 10.C 9`;-0;a,s11
Project No. DWQ (to be provided by DWQ)
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - 401 WET DETENTION BASIN WORKSHEET
DWO Stormwater Management Plan Review:
i
A complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a wet detention basin worksheet for each basin,
design calculations, plans and specifications showing all basin and outlet structure details, and a fully executed
operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional
information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
1. PROJECT INFORMATIO)\I I ase complete o lowin information :
Project Name
44
Contact Person: Phone Number:
For projects with multiple basins, specify which basin this worksheet applies to: !:Q
Basin Bottom Elevation
Permanent Pool Elevation
Temporary Pool Elevation
Permanent Pool Surface Area
Drainage Area
Impervious Area
•-7 ft.
ft.
sq. ft.
ac.
CoD. ?_ ac.
(average elevation of the floor of the basin)
(elevation of the orifice invert out)
(elevation of the outlet structure invert in)
(water surface area at permanent pool elevation)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
Permanent Pool Volume IQ% 4 cu. ft. (combined volume of main basin and forebay)
Temporary Pool Volume cu. ft. (volume detained on top of the permanent pool)
Forebay Volume cu. ft.=,1
SA/DA used 4 (surface area to drainage area ratio)
Diameter of Orifice ea in. (draw down orifice diameter)
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
The following checklist outlines design requirements per the Stormwater Best Management Practices manual
(N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources, November 1995) and Administrative Code
Section: 15 A NCAC 2H. 1008. Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have
been met and supporting documentation is attached. I fa requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of
why.
The temporary pool controls runoff from the 1 inch storm event.
The basin length to width ratio is greater than 3:1.
The basin side slopes are no steeper than 3:1.
A submerged and vegetated perimeter shelf at less than 6:1 is provided.
k-f PA Vegetation to the permanent pool elevation is specified.
htVA An emergency drain is provided to drain the basin.
The permanent pool depth is between 3 and 6 feet (required minimum of 3 feet).
The temporary pool draws down in 2 to 5 days. W
The forebay volume is approximately equal to 20% of the total basin volume. &Aop
Sediment storage is provided in the permanent pool.
Access is provided for maintenance.
A minimum 30-foot vegetative filter is provided at the outlet. 1--4 551
A site specific operation and maintenance (O&M) plan is provided.
A vegetation management/mowing schedule is provided in the O&M plan.
Semi-annual inspections are specified in the O&M plan.
A debris check is specified in the O&M plan to be performed after every storm event.
A specific sediment clean-out benchmark is listed (elevation or depth) in O&M plan.
A responsible party is designated in the O&M plan.
SW 1100 09/97 Page 1 of 1
Group, Inc.
LAND PLANNING
CIVIL ENGINEERING
i
CON5TRUCTION MANAGEMENT
? MEMO
? TELEPHONE
? FIELD REPORT
CALCULATIONS
AUTHOR:
1;4
o5 -r V?14t)
?/? DATE: TIME: I I ,
PROJECT: 60/C / Ie? . ?d 12 CLIENT:
5U13JECT: PROJECT NO.:

w
o il 11
r

00,
4 •
y L e 5!

4 +

11000 Regency Parkway, 5uite 410, Cary, NC 27511
Voice [phone] Fax [phone]
i
Gov. Village Wet Pond
Wet Pond
Q=CIA C I(100) AC
0.45 9.5 143.54
Proposed Impervious
Impervious Total
60.570 Acres
Wet Detention Pond Design
Total Drainage Area -
Impervious On-Site Area -
Soils -
Hydraulic Soils Group -
Curve Number -
Minimum TR-55 Time of concentration =
Time of Concentration used =
Percentage of Impervious Area -
Average Depth 4.3 feet
SA/DA ratio 1.43
Surface Area Required = 2.05 Acres
89,412 s.f.
Surface Area Provided = 97,804 s.f.
I" Storage Volume
Rv = 0.05+0.009 (1)
I = Percent Impervious
Rv = 0.430 (in./in.)
Volume = (Design Rainfall) (Rv) (Drainage Area)
1" Volume Required = 5.139 ac.ft.
223,845 c.f.
1" Volume Provided = 268,592 c.f.
143.540 Acres
60.570 Acres
5 min.
5 min.
42%
4.3' Deep
614 US
Governors Village Wet Pond U?T R©H
r6-- I?- M. ? D501NF,
sfieP 4 0 K? t
Revised Wet Pond - 03127106
Total Drainage Area - 143.540 Acres
Impervious On-Site Area - 60.570 Acres
Percentage of Impervious Area - 42.2%
1- storage Volume
RV = 0.05+0.009 (1)
1= Percent Impervious
Rv = 0.430 (in./In.)
Volume = (Design Rainfall) (Rv) (Drainage Area)
1" Vol. Req.- 5.139 acres
223,845 c.f.
b. Wet Storage Provided
- Incremental Total Total
Elev. Area (sf.) Volume (cf.) Volume (cf.) Volume (gal.) Depth (ft.)
243.7 97,804
89,690 89,690 670,881.20 1
242.7 81,576
79,628 169,318 1,266,498.64 2
241.7 77,680
75,764 245,082 1,833,209.62 3
240.7 73,847
71,963 317,045 2,371,492.86 4
239.7 70,079
68,228 385,272 2,881,834.56 5
238.7 66,376
33,263 418,535 3,130,641.80 6
237.7 150
110 418,645 3,131,464.60 7
236.7 70
Average Hydraulic Depth = 4.28 Feet
c. Temporary Storage Provided
Incremental Total Total
Elev. Area (at.) Volume (cf.) Volume (cf.) Volume (gal.) Depth (ft)
246.3 108,757
64,518 64,518 482,592.40 2
245.7 106,302
104,162 168,679 1, 261, 720.42 1
244.7 102,021
99,913 268,592 2,009,065.92 0
243.7 97,804
d. Drawdown of Temporary Storage Pool
Drawdown calculation for 1- Volume
Orifice required for 2-5 Day Drawdown
4 2.60 it 1.30 It
6.00 in. Orifice Size Q2-day= 186,174
Q = 1.077 cis Q5-day= 465,435
So, this Onfice win drawdown pond in 2.89 days (This references required volume calc)
Storage depth= 2.60 it Intennim Calc 9.14986
Average head= 1.30 it Orifice Area = 0.19625 Used for Q
v
v
CD
m
r -
m
N N N N N C
(n o 00 -4
ccoo 0
0
<

o
v =r
41 to o 0 0 C. CF)
cD L7 d N O O
A O O O U) cr

` 0
g .
N
o C
C rn
O d C
D CO
a)
= =r
CD
7
X
(D a)
CT
cz
W
A
N
A

N
0
N N O
a) a
v
n b.
00

N
U)
N 'A 0 =3
CS x C
CD Er o CA
0
=r N CD r C13
o 3 < (j)
-i CA)
-A CA) W (D 0
X
O N x D v O Cn O
CL co v C)
m
fD O ao
? ? v v
o
n
Cr (DD c = ?' n
0 o0
X
N CD
m c0
? 00
CA -1
N CA
Ch M
N
a I .
-
0
3 3
m
cn
o CD '
72.
m

CD
O
N -
CD m
co CL n n
<'
CD
_ r CA
Cn N
OD
OD `< ::r
CD
O CA CA W O O

=r
CD 0
C CD
CAD
3
-0 o
=r r
0
p) Ca
CD n

Ln -4 -4 -4

O
O
II
O
Cn
^
!'1J

r

la
co
0 O
m?
CD CD
m m
G
' 0
cn O
-0 d
`G

DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - 401 EXTENDED DETENTION (and POCKET*) WETLAND WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION please mplete the fvn gwi g information):
Project Name : ,,
Contact Person: .?-- a Phone Number: o
For projects with multiple basins, specify which basin this worksheet applies to: 4?/A
Permanent Pool Elevation 2 1 ft. (elevation of the orifice invert out)
Temporary Pool Elevation 7 4 :1 ::1 ft. (elevation of the outlet structure invert in)
Permanent Pool Surface Area I r2 sq. ft. (water surface area at permanent pool elevation)
Drainage Area ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
Impervious Area ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
Forebay Surface Area 1 sq. ft. (at permanent pool elevation approximately 15%)*
Marsh W-9" Surface Area sq. ft. (at permanent pool elevation approximately 35%)*
Marsh 9"-18" Surface Area sq. ft. (at permanent pool elevation approximately 35%)*
Micro Pool Surface Area sq. ft. (at permanent pool elevation approximately 15%)*
Temporary Pool Volume u. ft. (volume detained on top of the permanent pool)
SAIDA used ©• ?? (surface area to drainage area ratio)*
Diameter of Orifice in. (draw down orifice diameter)
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project
Applicants Initials I{? LIDU as ar
W The temporary pool controls runoff from the 1 inch rain.
The basin side slopes are no steeper than 3:1.
A planting plan for the marsh areas with plant species and densities is provided.
Vegetation above the permanent pool elevation is specified.
An emergency drain is provided to drain the basin.
The temporary pool draws down in 2 to 5 days.
Sediment storage is provided in the permanent pool.
Lim A sediment disposal area is provided.
Access is provided for maintenance. -? V'C'?
A site specific, signed and notarized operation and maintenance agreement is provided. 1%
The drainage area (including any offsite area) is delineated on a site plan.
Access is provided for maintenance. Cwe?Rt\?6
Plan details for the wetland are provided.
Plan details for the inlet and outlet are provided.
A site specific operation and maintenance agreement, signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided (s
hftp://h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/oandm.doc).
Pocket Wetlands have different design parameters and are only assumed to remove 35% TSS - See pp. 19 and 20 of the NC DENR
Stormwater BMP Manual, April 1999.10% open water, 50% high marsh, 40% low marsh.

Revised Wetland Pond - 03127106
Total Drainage Area - 143.540 Acres
Impervious On-Site Area - 60.570 Acres
Percentage of Impervious Area - 42.2%
I' Storage Volume
Rv = 0.05+0.009 (1)
= Percent Impervious
Rv = 0.430 (in.fin.)
Volume = (Design Rainfall) (Rv) (Drainage Area)
1" Vol. Req.= 5.139 acres
223,845 c.f.
b. Wet Storage Provided
Incremental Total Total
Elev. Area (at.) volume (cf.) Volume (cf.) Volume (gal.) Depth (ft.)
244.7 28,278
14,302 14,302 106,976.72 0.7
244 12,584
9,875 24,176 180,837.98 1.7
243 7,165
4,540 28,716 214,793.44 2.7
242 1,914
c. Temporary Storage Provided
Incremental Total Total
Elev. Area (Sr.) Volume (cf.) Volume (cf.) Volume (gal.) Depth (ft.)
247.7 82,734
57,142 57,142 427,425.15 2.3
247 80,530
73,967 131,109 980,698.31 1.3
246 67,404
62,193 193,303 1,445,904.20 0
244.7 28,278
d. Drawdown of Temporary Storage Pool
Drawdown calculation for 1" Volume
Orifice required for 2-5 Day Drawdown
2.30 ft 1.1511
6.00 in. Orifice Size 02-day= 175,104
Q= 1.013 cfs Q5-day= 437,760
So, this Orifice will drawdown pond in 2.21 days (This references required volume talc)
Storage depth= 2.30 It Intennim Calc. 8.60581
Average head= 1.15 It Onice Area = 0.19625 Used for 0
c13) 1
CD
m
N
m
N A A - C
T1
C
O CO OD V
O Cl)
p N _S
N -• (A A
CD Q v N CS
(7
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 ?
N N
O N O O O O O O O A
_ r v CD Ip
a) =r
V
X
CD ?
CD a)
o
?
j

0 Q

C
U)
:3 D
n
7 O 0 7 `G
^ JC

Q CL

m N
A
co
[n

o
A
U) CD
fA
0 co
'D C.) "
3
m
--1
ao
D.
m O
x
? m n -I CO N C)
Q- Co v <
m co
* 3 y

C
CL o
--ft
N
m

=

I

N

A
=r 0 o
C(
D O
70
n
O
X
G) -
°
'° W CA)
CL Cn -? v O)

O
A
N.
? m
o `° o
I a n?

CD (C
sv CD
::3
CD
a
y p rn ? v

c m
CD N
n -i
CD
3
-0 o
=r r

CD P.
N
CCn 0) Ci

O
O
I I
O)
C11
0
T
cn

N
n O
=r v
3 `D
CD
cn CD
? Q-
cn U
D O
sv
A

.. 1
T CHNICAL. PECIFICATIONS
FOR
GOVERNORS VILLAGE FOND DAM
MODIFICATION
CHATHAM COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
Z
i4' . rE O" . Off
,a0' ¢F'ss???3 `?r?ti{1Elt?f'9 sr..
v" ? ?maaaose„ fjl `R
?,Zb •a??Dd? ?- O_
SEAS
T
March 2006
C,e Oro-up 5i, inc.
LAN f> USf= E\/A.LUATI ON
CI\/IL. EIVGIIVEf=1ZIIVG
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
11000 Regency Parkway, Suite 4 10
Cary, NC 275 1 1
Voice [phone] - fax [phone]
? I.
i
SECTION 02110 - CLEARING and GRUBBING for POND BOTTOM & EMBANKMENT
PART 1 GENERAL
1.01 Utilities
i
A. Contact all utility companies prior to excavation.
B. Locate utilities by hand excavation and protect from damage.
C. If lines are encountered that were not previously identified, promptly notify Owner's
Representative and Utility to insure that service is not interrupted. Locate on as-built drawings.
D. Cooperate with Owner's Representative and utility companies in maintaining services. Do not
break utility connections without providing temporary services acceptable to Owner's
j Representative and utility company.
E. Repair damages to existing utilities as directed by utility company or reimburse the utility for the
work done as required.
1.02 Explosives
Use of explosives will not be permitted.
1.03 Protections
A. Protect structures, utilities, sidewalks, pavements, and other facilities indicated to remain from
damage. Protect adjacent properties as required.
B. Provide suitable barricades to open excavations and provides adequate warning lights.
C. Protect existing trees and vegetation which are to remain from physical damage. Do not store
materials or equipment within the drip line.
D. Provide bracing, shoring, and dewatering in excavations as required to maintain sides, to protect
adjacent structures from settlement, and to prevent injury to personnel, complying with local and
OSHA regulations. Maintain bracing and shoring until excavations are backfilled.
E. Do not interfere with normal traffic on roads, streets, walks, and other adjacent occupied or used
facilities. When working in the NCDOT right-of-way, adhere to all requirements as outlined upon
the encroachment and driveway permit.
F. Restore affected areas to the condition existing prior to the start of work, unless otherwise directed.
F. Control air pollution, caused by dust and dirt, from becoming a nuisance to the public and
operations. Comply with governing regulations.
Governors Village Pond 02110-1

G. Burning of waste materials is not permitted. Burning of clearing materials is not allowed within
1200 feet of any residence. Upon authorization of the Owner burning of cleared material is
allowed provided all required local permits are obtained by the contractor and are adhered to.
H. Follow approved erosion control plan.
1.04 Clearing
A. Unless directed otherwise by Owner's Representative, remove all obstructions interfering with
construction or operation to a minimum of 2' below grade and properly dispose of off site.
Clearing to include but not be limited to such items as trees, shrubs, buildings, pavement, and
foreign articles from the area bounded by all curb or pavement lines and all adjoining property
lines.
B. Strip all vegetation, top soil, and rubble from the construction area. At the request of Owner's
Representative, excess fill or excavated dirt may be saved for later use.
C. Disposal. Remove from site and properly dispose of excess excavated material, trash, debris and
waste material. Inert material may be wasted within the project limits as directed by the Owner.
END OF SECTION 02110
Governors Village Pond 02110-2

UniSpec R
SECTION 02370 - EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL
GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
031004
Section Includes
Installation of temporary and permanent erosion and sedimentation control systems.
Installation of temporary and permanent slope protection systems.
Related Sections
Section 02110 - Site Clearing
Section 02300 - Earthwork
Section 02630 - Storm Drainage
Construction Drawings
1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS
A. Protect adjacent properties, any identified endangered or threatened species or critical habitat, any
identified cultural or historic resources, and receiving water resources from erosion and sediment
damage until final stabilization.
-Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
B. No disturbance allowed within existing wetland areas until U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 404 and
N.C. Division of Water Quality 401 permitting has been received and a copy on-site. Only disturb
areas as outlined within these approved permits.
PRODUCTS
2.1 MATERIALS
Quick growing grasses such as wheat, rye, or oats in accordance with Seeding Schedule upon the plans.
Silt Fencing for sedimentation control as specified on the Construction Drawings.
Rip-Rap as specified on the drawings.
Temporary and permanent outfall structures as specified on the drawings.
EXECUTION
3.1 PREPARATION
Review the drawings and approved Erosion Control Plan.
Conduct pre-construction meeting with Owner, Engineer, Geotechnical Engineer and Regulatory Agencies.
Governors Village Pond
3.2 EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL AND SLOPE PROTECTION
IMPLEMENTATION
A. Place erosion control systems in accordance with the drawings and approved permit or as may be
dictated by site conditions in order to maintain the intent of the specifications and permits.
B. Deficiencies or changes on the drawings or Erosion Control Plan shall be corrected or implemented as
site conditions change.
C. Owner has authority to limit surface area of erodible earth material exposed by clearing and grubbing,
excavation, borrow and embankment operations and to direct Contractor to provide immediate
permanent or temporary pollution control measures.
D. Maintain temporary erosion and sedimentation control systems as dictated by site conditions, indicated
in the construction documents, or as directed by governing authorities or Owner to control sediment
until final stabilization. Contractor shall respond to maintenance or additional work ordered by Owner
or governing authorities immediately, but in no case, within not more than 7 days if required at no
additional cost to the Owner.
E. Contractor shall incorporate permanent erosion control features, paving, permanent slope stabilization,
and vegetation into project at earliest practical time to minimize need for temporary controls.
F. Permanently seed and tack embankment slopes as embankment construction proceeds to extent
considered desirable and practical.
G. Slopes that erode easily or that will not be graded for a period of 14 days or more shall be temporarily
seeded as work progresses with wheat or rye unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents. In
the event it is not practical to seed areas, slopes must be stabilized with an asphalt tack or other means
to reduce the erosive potential of the area.
H. Permanent Riprap
(a) General
The contractor shall furnish all materials and labor required for placing riprap and
bedding to the lines and dimensions as shown on the drawings.
(b) Quality
Individual rocks shall be dense, sound, and resistant to abrasion and shall be free from
cracks, seams, and other defects that would tend to increase unduly their alteration by
water and frost actions. The rocks may be either angular, as obtained from quarry
operations, or round, except that round rocks shall not be placed on any surfaces having
slopes steeper than 2:1. The rocks shall have a minimum bulk specific gravity of 2.4 (150
pounds per cubic foot) when tested in accordance with ASTM C-99.
(c) Gradation
Meet NCDOT Specifications for gradation.
(d) Bedding
Bedding material shall be compacted in layers not exceeding 10 inches in loose thickness
by at least three coverages of the tread of a D8 tractor weighing at least 34,500 pounds.
Bedding material within 5 feet of structures shall be compacted in layers not exceeding 6
inches in loose thickness by hand-held power tampers. Bedding material shall be placed
Governors Village Pond
UniSpec II
SECTION 02300 - EARTHWORK
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
Excavation, filling, and backfilling for dam embankment and structures
Trenching and backfilling for utilities.
B. Related Sections
Section 02370 - Erosion Control and Sedimentation. Temporary and permanent erosion control.
C. Order of Precedence: The "Foundation Subsurface Preparation" as shown on the The Drawings and any onsite
direction by their Project Geotechnical Engineer shall take precedence over the provisions of this section whenever
duplication or conflict occurs.
1.2 REFERENCES
'A. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
ASTM D 422 - Standard Test Method For Particle Size Analysis of Soil
ASTM D 698 - Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort (12,400 ft-lbf/ft (600
kN.m/m3))
ASTM D 1557 - Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort (56,000 ft-lbf/ft (2,700
Kn.m/m3))
ASTM D 2922 - Density of Soil and Soil-Aggregate In Place by Nuclear Methods (Shallow Depth)
ASTM D 4318 - Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils
B. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)
AASHTO T 88 - Particle Size Analysis of Soils
C. North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT):
Standard Specifications for Construction and Materials
D. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
NFPA 70 - National Electrical Code
E. American Water Works Association (AWWA)
AWWA C200 - Standard For Steel Water Pipe - 6 In. (150 Mm) And Larger
AWWA C206 - Field Welding Of Steel Water Pipe
1.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE
A. An independent testing laboratory (GeoTechnologies), selected and paid for by the Owner, will be retained to
perform construction testing on site.
The independent testing laboratory shall prepare test reports that indicate test location, elevation data, and test
results. Owner, Civil Engineering Consultant, and Contractor shall be provided with copies of reports within 96
hours of time that test was performed. In event that test performed fails to meet Specifications, the independent
testing laboratory shall notify Owner and Contractor immediately.
02300-1
-Governors Village Pond 03/27/06
Costs related to retesting due to failures shall be paid for by the Contractor at no additional expense to Owner.
Contractor shall provide free access to site for testing activities.
Quality assurance testing will be conducted in accordance with Paragraph "Field Testing" in Part 3 hereinafter.
1.4 DEFINITIONS
A. Satisfactory Soils: ASTM D 2487 soil classification groups GC, SC, ML, MH, CL, CH, GW, GP, GM, SW, SP,
and SM, or a combination of these group symbols; free of rock or gravel larger than allowed for fill or backfill
material as specified hereinafter or as shown on the drawings. Satisfactory soil shall contain no debris, waste,
frozen materials, vegetation, and other deleterious matter.
B. Unsatisfactory Materials: Materials which do not comply with the requirements for satisfactory materials are
unsatisfactory including materials classified in ASTM D 2487 soil classification groups, , OL, OH, and PT, or a
combination of these group symbols.
Unsatisfactory materials also include man-made fills; trash; refuse; backfills from previous construction; and
material classified as satisfactory which contains root and other organic matter or frozen material. The Contracting
Officer shall be notified of any contaminated materials.
Unsatisfactory soils also include satisfactory soils not maintained within -2 to +4 percent of optimum moisture
content at time of compaction.
1.5 SUBMITTALS
A. Submit certification that all material obtained from off-site sources complies with specification requirements.
B. Submit name of each material supplier and specific type and source of each material. Change in source throughout
project requires approval of Owner.
C. If fabrics or geogrids are to be used, design shall be submitted for approval to Owner.
D. Shop drawings or details pertaining to excavating and filling are not required unless otherwise shown on the
Drawings or if contrary procedures to Construction Documents are proposed.
E. Shop drawings or details pertaining to site utilities are not required unless required by regulatory authorities or
unless uses of materials, methods, equipment, or procedures that are contrary to The Drawings or Specifications
are proposed. Do not perform work until Owner has accepted required shop drawings.
F. Contact utility companies and determine if additional easements will be required to complete project. Provide
written confirmation of the status of all easements to Owner at time of Preconstruction Conference or no later than
90 days prior to project possession date.
PART 2 -PRODUCTS
A. Fill and Backfill. Satisfactory soil materials excavated from the site.
B. Imported Fill Material: Satisfactory borrow material has been identified within the project site at the proposed
reuse pond. Use of offsite borrow areas for embankment material is prohibited.
C. Trench Backfill: ASTM D 2321 unless otherwise specified or shown on the drawings.
D. Bedding: Aggregate Type as indicated on the plans or naturally or artificially graded mixture of natural or crushed
gravel, crushed stone, and natural or crushed sand; ASTM D 2940; except with 100 percent passing a 1-inch sieve
and not more than 8 percent passing a No. 200 sieve.
E. Drainage Fill: Washed, narrowly graded mixture of crushed stone, or crushed or uncrushed gravel; ASTM D 448;
coarse-aggregate grading Size 57; with 100 percent passing a 1-1/2- inch sieve and 0 to 5 percent passing a No. 8
sieve.
02300-2
-Governors Village Pond 03/27/06
F. Filter Material: Narrowly graded mixture of natural or crushed gravel, or crushed stone and natural sand;
ASTM D 448; coarse-aggregate grading Size 67; with 100 percent passing a 1-inch sieve and 0 to 5 percent
passing a No. 4 sieve.
G. Topsoil: Topsoil shall consist of stripping material excavated from the site. Topsoil shall consist of organic
surficial soil found in depth of not more than 6-inches. Topsoil shall be as further defined in Section 02900 -
Planting
H. Filter and non woven drainage fabrics: Contech C-80NW or approved equivalent
I
2.2 EQUIPMENT
A. Transport off-site materials to project using well-maintained and operating vehicles. Once on site, transporting
vehicles shall stay on designated haul roads and shall at no time endanger improvements by rutting, overloading, or
pumping.
2.3 SOURCE QUALITY CONTROL
A. Laboratory testing of materials proposed for use in the project shall be by the Independent Testing Laboratory at
no cost to Contractor. The Contractor shall provide samples of material obtained off-site.
B. Following tests shall be performed on each type of on-site or imported soil material used as compacted fill:
Moisture and Density Relationship: ASTM D 698 or ASTM D 1557.
Mechanical Analysis: AASHTO T 88 or ASTM D422.
Plasticity Index: ASTM D 4318
PART 3 -EXECUTION
i
3.11 PREPARATION
A. Identify required lines, levels, contours, datum, elevations, and grades necessary for construction as shown on the
drawings.
B. Notify utility companies to remove or relocate public utilities that are in conflict with proposed improvements.
C. Protect plant life, lawns, fences, existing structures, sidewalks, paving, and curbs, unless otherwise noted on the
drawings from excavating equipment and vehicular traffic.
D. Protect benchmarks, property corners, and other survey monuments from damage or displacement. If marker needs
to be removed it shall be referenced by licensed land surveyor and replaced, as necessary, by same.
E. Foundation Preparation. Site grading should initially begin with the removal of all vegetation and topsoil from
within the limits of the proposed axis of the new dam. The stripped materials may be wasted below normal pool on
the interior of the reservoir or be stockpiled for reuse in landscaping other portions of the project. Following
removal of all topsoil materials, the foundation of the dam should be proofrolled with a loaded dump truck or
similar piece of equipment under the observation of a geotechnical engineer to identify any areas needing
additional repair. Based on the results of the test borings, and a probe rod inspection of the dam axis performed
utilizing a half inch diameter steel probe rod, we anticipate that repair depths will not exceed about 12 to 24 inches
in most areas provided that site grading operations are conducted during the typically warmer and dryer summer
months. If the site is graded during the cooler and wetter winter months, we anticipate that the contractor will
encounter more significant areas of instability. Repairs at the bottom of the stream channel should be minimal since
hard silts are present near the base of the channel; however, some deeper repairs could be required along the bank
of the channel.
02300-3
-Governors Village Pond 03/27/06
Prior to placement of the first lift of soil, the subgrade should be scarified, moisture conditioned as necessary, and a
thin lift of new fill placed prior to initial compaction. This procedure is recommended in order to provide for a less
distinctive boundary between the fill and virgin soil. In the event that permeable near surface soils are encountered
once site grading begins, consideration could be given to constructing a key trench at the foundation level near the
center of the dam. The borings do not indicate that a key trench will be needed; however, the foundation should be
inspected to verify these findings.
F. Maintain in operating condition existing utilities, previously installed utilities, and drainage systems encountered in
utility installation. Repair surface or subsurface improvements shown on The Drawings.
G. Verify location, size, elevation, and other pertinent data required making connections to existing utilities and
drainage systems as indicated on The Drawings.
H. Over excavate and properly prepare areas of subgrade that are not capable of supporting proposed systems.
Stabilize these areas by using acceptable geotextile fabrics or aggregate material placed and compacted as
specified by the geotechnical engineer.
1. Damages:
Contractor shall be responsible for and shall repair any damage to work in place, other contractor's equipment,
utilities, residences, highways, roads, railroads, private and municipal well systems, adjacent structures, natural
resources, habitat, existing wells, and the excavation. Contractor responsibility shall also include, damage to the
bottom due to heave and including but not limited to, removal and pumping out of the excavated area that may
result from Contractor's negligence, inadequate or improper design and operation of the dewatering system, and
any mechanical or electrical failure of the dewatering system.
Remove subgrade materials rendered unsuitable by excessive wetting and replace with approved backfill material
at no additional cost to the Owner.
3.2 TOPSOIL EXCAVATION
A. Cut heavy growths of grass from areas before stripping and remove cuttings with remainder of cleared vegetative
material.
B. Strip topsoil to a depth of not less than 6 inches from areas that are to be filled, excavated, landscaped, or
re-graded to such depth that it prevents intermingling with underlying subsoil or questionable material.
C. Stockpile topsoil in storage piles in areas shown on The Drawings or where directed by Owner. Construct storage
piles to freely drain surface water. Cover storage piles as required to prevent windblown dust. Dispose of
unsuitable topsoil as specified for waste material, unless otherwise specified by Owner. Remove excess topsoil
from embankment location and haul to golf course corridor as specified by Owner's Representative.
3.3 ` GENERAL EXCAVATION
A. Classification of Excavation: The Contractor shall assure himself by site investigation or other necessary means
that he is familiar with the type, quantity, quality, and character of excavation work to be performed. Excavation
shall be considered unclassified excavation.
B. When performing grading operations during periods of wet weather, provide adequate dewatering, drainage and
ground water management to control moisture of soils.
C. Shore, brace, and drain excavations as necessary to maintain excavation as safe, secure, and free of water at all
times.
D. Excavate embankment areas to line and grade as shown on the Drawings unless directed by Geotecnical Engineer.
E. Place suitable excavated material into project fill areas.
02300-4
-Governors Village Pond 03/27106
F. Unsuitable excavated material shall be disposed on-site in manner and location that is acceptable to Owner and
local governing agencies.
G. Perform excavation using capable, well-maintained equipment and methods acceptable to Owner and local
governing agencies.
3.4 TRENCHING EXCAVATION FOR UTILITIES
A. Contract local utility companies before excavation begins. Dig trench at proper width and depth for laying pipe,
conduit, or cable. Cut trench banks vertical, if possible, and remove stones from bottom of trench as necessary to
avoid point-bearing. Over excavate wet or unstable soil, if encountered, from trench bottom as necessary to
provide suitable base for continuous and uniform bedding. Replace overexcavation with suitable and dispose of
unsuitable material.
B. Trench excavation sidewalls shall be sloped, shored, sheeted, braced, or otherwise supported by means of sufficient
strength to protect workmen in accordance with applicable rules and regulations established for construction by the
Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and by local ordinances. Lateral
travel distance to exit ladder or steps shall not be greater than 25 feet in trenches 4 feet or deeper.
C. Perform trench excavation as indicated on the Drawings for specified depths. During excavation, stockpile
materials suitable for backfilling in orderly manner far enough from bank of trench to avoid overloading, slides, or
cave-ins.
D. Remove excavated materials not required or not suitable for backfill or embankments and waste off-site or at on-
site locations approved by the Owner and in accordance with governing regulations.
E. Prevent surface water from flowing into trenches or other excavations by temporary grading or other methods, as
required. Remove accumulated water in trenches and other excavations as specified.
F. Open cut excavation with trenching machine or backhoe. Where machines other than ladder or wheel-type
trenching machines are used, do not use clods for backfill.
G. Accurately grade trench bottom to provide uniform bearing and support for each section of pipe on bedding
material at every point along entire length.
H. Trench width below top of pipe shall not be less than 12 inches nor more than 18 inches wider than outside surface
of pipe or conduit that is to be installed to designated elevations and grades. Other trench width for pipe, conduit,
or cable shall be least practical width that will allow for proper compaction of trench backfill.
3.5 SUBGRADE PREPARATION
A. Scarification and Compaction: Areas exposed by excavation or stripping and on which subgrade preparations are
to be performed shall be scarified to minimum depth of 8 inches and compacted as specified hereinafter.
B. Proofrolling: Subgrades shall be proofrolled to detect areas of insufficient compaction. Proofrolling shall be
accomplished by making minimum of 2 complete passes with fully-loaded tandem-axle dump truck with a
maximum weight of 20 tons, or approved equal, in each of 2 perpendicular directions while under the supervision
and direction of the Geotechnical Engineer. Document and explain proofrolling inspection procedures and results
in the laboratory inspection report. Areas of failure shall be excavated and recompacted. Subgrade exposed longer
than 48 hours or on which precipitation has occurred shall be re-proofrolled.
3.6 'FILLING
A. Fill areas to contours and elevations shown on the Drawings with unfrozen materials.
Place fills in continuous 6-8" lifts with exception to backfill around structures noted below. No fill shall
be placed on any part of the embankment foundation until the area to be covered has been inspected and
i 02300-5
-Governors Village Pond 03/27/06
approved. The distribution of materials shall be such that the embankment will be free from lenses,
pockets, streaks, and layers of material differing substantially in texture or gradation from the surrounding
material. Materials shall be spread in layers of uniform thickness. Unless otherwise directed, the thickness
of layers before compaction shall be not more than 8 inches. Compaction of each layer shall be conducted
in a systematic and continuous manner so as to ensure the specified coverage.
B. Rolling shall be done parallel to the axis of the dam wherever possible. The embankment shall be brought up in
layers such that the surface is essentially level at all times, except for a slight slope for drainage.
C. Fill within proposed embankment subgrade shall not contain rock or stone greater than 6 inches in any dimension.
D. Fill materials used in preparation of subgrade shall be placed in lifts or layers not to exceed 8 inches loose measure
and compacted as specified hereinafter.
E. Extreme care shall be taken while backfilling against box culverts. Backfill adjacent to pipes or structures shall be
of the type and quality conforming to that specified for the adjoining fill material. The fill shall be placed in
horizontal layers not to exceed four inches in thickness and compacted by hand tampers or other manually directed
compaction equipment. The material needs to fill completely all spaces under and adjacent to the pipe. At no time
during the backfilling operation shall driven equipment be allowed to operate closer than four feet, measured
horizontally, to any part of a structure. Under no circumstances shall equipment be driven over any part of a
concrete structure or pipe, unless there is a compacted fill of 24" or greater over the structure or pipe.
F. The movement of the hauling and spreading equipment over the fill shall be controlled so that the entire surface of
each lift shall be traversed by not less than one tread track of heavy equipment or compaction shall be achieved by
a minimum of four complete passes of a sheepsfoot, rubber tired or vibratory roller. Fill material shall contain
sufficient moisture such that the required degree of compaction will be obtained with the equipment used. The fill
material shall contain sufficient moisture so that if formed into a ball it will not crumble, yet not be so wet that
water can be squeezed out.
3.7
A.
B.
3.8
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
PIPE BEDDING
Box Culverts shall be placed upon compacted subgrade. The subgrade shall be compacted to a minimum 95% of
the standard Proctor ( maximum dry density ).
Place geotextile fabrics in locations as specified on the Drawings.
TRENCH BACKFILLING
Materials used for trench backfill shall comply with requirements as specified herein.
Backfill and compact in accordance with fill and compaction requirements in accordance with ASTM D 2321
unless otherwise shown on the drawings.
Do not backfill trenches until required tests are performed and utility systems comply with and are accepted by
applicable governing authorities.
Backfill trenches to contours and elevations shown on the Drawings.
Do not backfill over porous, wet, frozen, or spongy subgrade surfaces.
02300-6
-Governors Village Pond 03/27/06
3.9 COMPACTION
A. Compact as follows:
Percent of Maximum Laboratory Density
Location ASTM D698 ASTM D1557
Subgrade & Fill 95 N/A
B. Maintain moisture content of not less than 2 percent below optimum moisture content of fill materials to attain
required compaction density.
C. Exercise proper caution when compacting immediately over top of pipes or conduits. Water jetting or flooding is
not permitted as method of compaction.
D. Corrective Measures for Non-Complying Compaction: Remove and recompact deficient areas until proper
compaction is obtained or as directed by Geotechnical Engineer.
3.10 MAINTENANCE OF SUBGRADE
A. Verify finished subgrades to ensure proper elevation and conditions for construction above subgrade.
B. Protect, subgrade from excessive wheel loading during construction, including concrete trucks, dump trucks, and
other construction equipment.
C. Remove areas of finished subgrade found to have insufficient compaction density to depth necessary and replace in
manner that will comply with compaction requirements by use of material with CBR or LBR equal to or better than
that specified on the drawings. Surface of subgrade after compaction shall be firm, uniform, smooth, stable, and
true to grade and cross-section.
D. Construct temporary ditches and perform such grading as necessary to maintain positive drainage away from
subgrade at all times.
3.11 BORROW AND SPOIL SITES
A. Comply with NPDES and local erosion control permitting requirements for any and all on-site and off-site,
disturbed spoil and borrow areas. Upon completion of spoil or borrow operations, clean up spoil or borrow areas
in a neat and reasonable manner to the satisfaction of Owner or off-site property owner, if applicable.
3.12 FINISH GRADING
A. Check grading of building subgrades by string line from grade stakes (blue tops) set at not more than 50-foot
centers. Allowable tolerance shall be plus or minus 0.10 feet from plan grade. Provide engineering and field
staking as necessary for verification of lines, grades, and elevations.
B. Grade areas where finish grade elevations or contours are indicated on the Drawings, other than paved areas and
buildings, including excavated areas, filled and transition areas, and landscaped areas. Graded areas shall be
uniform and smooth, free from rock, debris, or irregular surface changes. Ground surfaces shall vary uniformly
between indicated elevations. Grade finished ditches to allow for proper drainage without ponding and in manner
that will minimize erosion potential. For topsoil, sodding, and seeding requirements refer to seeding schedule on
construction drawings.
C. Correct settled and eroded areas within 1 year after date of completion at no additional expense to Owner. Bring
grades to proper elevation.
02300-7
-Governors Village Pond 03/27/06
I-
3. 13 FIELD TESTING
A. Field density tests for in-place materials will be performed by the Owner's Independent Testing Laboratory (ITL)
as follows:
During actual construction, density tests should be performed at the rate of one test per 5,000 to 10,000 square feet
of fill material placed per lift. The field compaction control should be provided on a full-time basis to identify any
potential problem areas. Additionally, compaction should be achieved with a trapezoidal wedge foot type
compactor such as a CAT 815 or with a sheep's foot compactor to minimize the potential for developing seepage
paths through the new embankment fill. As the fill is placed, rolling can be performed perpendicular to the axis of
the dam in order to tie the new fill into existing grade. Fill materials may be placed at moisture contents 2% dry of
optimum to the maximum percentage wet of optimum which will still allow achievement of required compaction
and sufficient stability to allow obtainment of compaction with subsequent lifts. All fill soils should be compacted
to a minimum of 95% of the standard Proctor maximum dry density.
B. Corrective Measures For Non-Complying Compaction: Remove and recompact deficient areas until proper
compaction is obtained at no additional expense to Owner. Adjust moisture content as necessary to conform to the
requirements of this section.
END OF SECTION
02300-8
-Governors Village Pond
03/27/06
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
GOVERNORS VILLAGE COMMERCIAL, LLC
GOVERNORS POND
MODIFICATIONS
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
S&EC Project No. 9325.W1
March 2006
ELECTRONIC COPY- NO SIGNATURE
Patrick K. Smith, P.E.
NC License No. 25525
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION I - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS .... 2
1.1 SRCTION INCLUDES .......................................2
1.2 SUMMARY OF WORK .....................................2
1.3 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT ....................2
SECTION 2 - QUALITY CONTROL .................2
2.1 SECTION INCLUDES .......................................2
2.2 PLANTING OBSERVATION ..............................2
SECTION 3 - BACKFILLING AND SURFACE
PREPARATION ............................................3
3.1 SECTION INCLUDES .......................................3
3.2 PLANTING PREPARATION ...............................3
SECTION 4 - WETLAND PLANTING ..............3
4.1 SECTION INCLUDES ........................................ 3
4.2 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT ..................... 3
4.3 REFERENCES ................................................... 3
4.4 GENERAL ........................................................ 3
4.5 BALL & BURLAP TREES ................................... 4
4.6 CONTAINER GROWN PLANTS .......................... 4
4.7 BARE ROOT PLANTS ....................................... 4
4.8 PLANT SUBSTITUTION .................................... 4
4.10 STORM WATER WETLAND PLANTING ........... 4
4.11 EMERGENT AND AQUATIC PLANTINGS ......... 5
4.12REMOVAL OF NUISANCE VEGETATION.......... 5
4.13 PLANTING PERIOD .......................................... 5
4.14WATER FOR PLANTINGS ................................. 5
4.15 SUBMITTALS .................................................. 5
SECTION 5 - PERMANENT SEEDING ........... . 6
5.1 SECTION INCLUDES ........................................ 6
5.2 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT ..................... 6
5.3 REFERENCES .................................................. 6
5.4 GENERAL ....................................................... 6
5.5 SEEDBED PREPARATION ................................ 6
5.6 SEEDING ......................................................... 6
5.7 SEEDING DATES ............................................. 6
5.8 SOIL AMENDMENTS ....................................... 6
5.9 MULCH ........................................................... 6
SECTION 6- SITE MAINTENANCE ................. 7
6.1 SECTION INCLUDES ........................................ 7
6.2 EXECUTION ....................................................7
4.9 PLANTING PREPARATION ...............................4
S&EC Project No. 9325.W1 Technical Specifications
Governors Pond Modifications 1 March 2006
SECTION 1 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
1.1 SECTION INCLUDES
General requirements and information related to the work including
summary of work, measurement and payment, and reference to
SPECIAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS.
1.2 SUMMARY OF WORK
The Governors Pond Modifications project consists of the construction
of an Extended Detention Storm Water Wetland to treat storm water
runoff from existing and proposed site facilities. This storm water
wetland is a permanent storm water treatment device, consisting of a
low earthen embanlanent, an outlet flow control structure (with
associated appurtenances), and wetland planting (tree, shrub, and
herbaceous). These Technical Specifications relate to the planting
component of this project. Refer to the contract Drawings and to these
Specifications for project details.
1.3 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT
All measurement and payment for services performed shall be as
indicated in the SPECIAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS. As such, they
are not defined in these Technical Specifications.
END OF SECTION
SECTION 2 - QUALITY CONTROL
2.1 SECTION INCLUDES
Observation of wetland planting including the installation of tree,
shrub, and herbaceous species and emergent marsh planting.
2.2 PLANTING OBSERVATION
The Owner will arrange and pay for an independent (or contracted)
environmental consultant to observe wetland planting (including
emergent marsh) as required in these Specifications. Reports (if
required) will be submitted concurrently to the Engineer, Owner, and
Contractor, documenting observations indicating compliance or
non-compliance with Contract Documents.
Observation of planting operations does not relieve Contractor of
obligation to perform Work to contract requirements. The Contractor
shall allow observation personnel access to plant materials (see wetland
plantings specified in SECTION 4) prior to and during planting
operations, and the construction site as required.
Observer or Contractor shall not have the authority to alter planting or
other parts of the work. Changes may only be made by written change
order approved by the Owner.
END OF SECTION
S&EC Project No. 9325.W 1 Technical Specifications
Governors Pond Modifications 2 March 2006
f
SECTION 3 - BACKFILLING AND SURFACE PREPARATION
13.1 SECTION INCLUDES
Specifications for Backfilling as it relates to seedbed preparation.
3.2 PLANTING PREPARATION
Areas where storm water wetland planting will be performed will be
backfilled to final grade with topsoil or other suitable material (deemed
of sufficient quality by the Engineer) as described in this section.
'Earth fill in areas where wetlands will be constructed shall be placed so
as to meet the following additional requirements:
I. Stockpiled topsoil shall be evenly distributed to a depth sufficient
to obtain the final grade as shown on the Drawings. Topsoil depth
shall be a minimum of 12 inches across the entire planting area.
2. The distribution of materials throughout each zone shall be
essentially uniform and the fill shall be free from material
differing substantially in texture or gradation from the surrounding
materials.
3. Backfill areas to contours and elevations with unfrozen materials.
Employ a placement method that does not disturb or damage
other work. Place backfill and fill in loose level lifts not to exceed
twelve inches in thickness. Make gradual grade changes. Blend
slope into level areas. Slope grade minimum 2 inches in 10 feet,
unless noted otherwise.
4. All areas where topsoil is distributed shall be disked or harrowed
to ensure soil aeration and to increase the surface roughness prior
i to planting or seeding.
5. Micro-topographic grading shall be performed as directed by
Engineer to develop the desired variation within the specified
planting zones.
END OF SECTION
SECTION 4 - WETLAND PLANTING
4.1 SECTION INCLUDES
Provide all necessary equipment and labor to implement planting plan.
4.2 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT
See SPECIAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS
4.3 REFERENCES
The Baily Hortorium (1976 MacMillan Publishing Co., Inc.)
American Standard for Nursery Stock, latest edition
NCDENR - Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design
Manual
15 NCAC 2B.200 - Classification of Water Quality Standards
Applicable to Surface Waters & Wetlands of North Carolina
The following Specifications and methods form a part of this
specification:
NCDOT - Standard Specifications for Roads and Structures.
When the Specifications or Drawings differ from the requirements of
the above-referenced documents, the more stringent requirements shall
apply.
4.4 GENERAL
All plants shall be as called for by these Specifications. Ball and
Burlap (B&B) plants shall be used as specified for all wetland
specimen tree species. Container grown plants (including 1-gallon and
3-gallon containers) shall be used as specified for the remaining
wetland tree and shrub species as described in the planting plan. Plugs,
bare roots or tuber/rhizomes shall be used as specified for herbaceous
(including emergent marsh and aquatic marsh) species. Bare rooted
plants may be used in lieu of container grown plants provided written
approval for such use has been obtained from the Engineer.
Grading of plants, type, and minimum dimensions of plant or container
size shall conform to the Specifications contained in the latest edition
of American Standard for Nursery Stock. Plants shall not be cut back
from larger sizes to meet sizes called for on the plans. Botanical names
referred to in the plans are taken from "Hortus Third", the Baily
Hortorium (1976 MacMillan Publishing Co., Inc.). All plants delivered
shall be true to name. Each plant, or group of the same species,
variety, and size of plant, shall be legibly tagged with the name and
size of the plant.
All plants shall be first-class representatives of their species. The root
system shall be vigorous and well-developed. The branch systems
shall be of normal development, and free from disfiguring knots, sun
scald injuries, abrasions of the bark, dead or dry wood, broken terminal
growth, or other objectionable disfigurements. Trees shall have
reasonably straight stems, and shall be well branched and symmetrical
in accordance with their natural habits of growth.
All plants shall be free from plant diseases and insect pests. All
shipments of plants shall comply with all nursery inspection and plant
quarantine regulations of the states of origin and destination, as well as
S&EC Project No. 9325.W 1 Technical Specifications
Governors Pond Modifications 3 March 2006

with Federal regulations governing interstate movement of nursery
stock. If nursery stock from other states is used, the stock shall be
accompanied by a tag or certificate stating, in effect, that the nursery
stock has been inspected and certified by an authorized official of the
state of origin as apparently free from injurious plant pests.
All plants shall be subject to inspection at any time by the Owner,
Engineer, or a party to be named by the Owner. Any such inspection
before or during planting operations, however shall not be construed as
final acceptance of the plants involved.
4.5 BALL & BURLAP TREES
4.8 PLANT SUBSTITUTION
No change in the specified plants (species, variety, size, caliper,
furnish, etc.) will be made without written approval of the Engineer.
All requests by the Contractor for substitutions shall be presented in
writing and shall include a listing of the sources which have been
contacted in an attempt to secure the specified plant material. Requests
for substitutions shall include botanical name, common name, size,
caliper, and furnish description of the proposed substitute. No increase
in compensation will be made to the Contractor as a result of the use of
the approved substitute plants.
Ball and burlap (B&B) plants shall be healthy, vigorous, and well-
rooted in the wrapped soil component. The plant diameter (caliper)
shall be of the size shown on the planting plan or larger, and shall be
wrapped in a sufficiently tight form to firmly hold the soil protecting
the root during transporting, handling, and planting, and the soil shall
not be allowed to become frozen.
The planting stock for B&B trees should be grown by nurseries within
the same physiographic province of North Carolina within 200 miles of
the project site. Plant stock may be obtained from nurseries beyond the
200-mile limit with the approval of the Engineer. All B&B trees shall
have a 2.5 -inch minimum caliper stem and show no signs of recent
stress. Larger trees are allowable at the discretion of the Engineer and
will be provided and installed at no additional cost to the Owner.
4.6 CONTAINER GROWN PLANTS
All containerized trees shall be nursery grown in 1-gallon pots
(minimum) and show no signs of recent stress. All containerized
shrubs shall be nursery grown in 1-gallon (minimum) and 3-gallon pots
(minimum for Specimen plantings) and show no signs of recent stress.
Container grown plants shall be healthy, vigorous, well-rooted, and
shall have become established in the container in which they are
delivered. These plants shall have been in the established container
long enough for the fibrous roots to have developed so that the root
mass will retain its shape and hold together when removed from the
container. The container shall be of the size shown on the planting
plan or larger, sufficiently rigid to firmly hold the soil protecting the
root during transporting, handling, and planting, and the soil shall not
be allowed to become frozen.
The planting stock for container vegetation should be grown by
nurseries within the Piedmont or Coastal Plain physiographic province
of North Carolina within 200 miles of the project site. Plant stock may
be obtained from nurseries beyond the 200-mile limit with the approval
of the Engineer.
4.7 BARE ROOT PLANTS
Bare root plants, if approved for use by the Engineer, shall have a
heavy fibrous root system which has been developed by proper cultural
treatment. They shall be dug, packaged, transported, and handled in a
manner that will prevent injury to or drying out of the trunks, branches,
or roots, or freezing of the roots.
The planting stock for bare root vegetation should be grown by
nurseries within the Piedmont or Coastal Plain physiographic province
of North Carolina within 200 miles of the project site. Plant stock may
be obtained from nurseries beyond the 200-mile limit with the approval
of the Engineer.
4.9 PLANTING PREPARATION
In areas where storm water wetland planting will be implemented,
preparation for planting operations shall be as described in SECTION
5.6 (Planting Preparation) of these Specifications.
Where B&B and container grown plants will be planted, holes made in
preparation for tree and shrub species planting shall be as shown on
construction plans and on the details.
Where bare root plants shall be planted in holes made by neatly
punching a hole into existing grade with a dibble bar, (a heavy metal
tool with a blade and a foot petal), the dimensions of the hole shall not
exceed 3" in any direction.
4.10 STORM WATER WETLAND PLANTING
Where storm water wetland planting is directed, areas shall be planted
with container grown or bare root seedlings of tree, shrub, and
herbaceous species as shown on construction plans. Planting shall be
spaced as shown on the plans. Specimen tree and shrub species shall
be installed as located on the planting plan unless otherwise directed by
the Engineer at the time of construction.
Site wetland planting is divided into three (3) specific zones as shown
on the Planting Plan for tree, shrub and herbaceous plantings. These
zones include Deep Water Planting, Saturated Planting, and Slope
Planting zones. These planting consist of bare roots, plugs, and 1-
gallon containerized plants.
Specimen trees and shrub species including B&B trees and 3-gallon
containerized shrubs have been specifically located for installation
across the storm water wetland.
Ball and Burlap (B&B) Plants
No planting shall be done when the temperature is below 32°F, when
soil to be excavated for the plant hole is frozen, when the sides or
bottom of the plant hole are frozen, or when the soil to be used for
backfilling is frozen or too wet. In digging, loading, transporting,
unloading, planting, or otherwise handling plants, the Contractor shall
exercise utmost care and use adequate precautions to prevent injury to
or drying out of the trunk, branches, or roots as well as prevent freezing
of the plant roots.
The planting hole or trench shall be deep and wide enough to permit
roots to spread out and down without J-rooting and be at least two
times the diameter of the rootball taking care not to plant the tree too
deeply. The rootball shall be placed on solid soil and not loose
backfill. Topsoil and subsoil shall be kept separate during excavation.
Soil shall be replaced around the tree and tamped to eliminate air
pockets. Fill the hole in stages, starting with topsoil and adding subsoil
S&EC Project No. 9325.W 1
Governors Pond Modifications
Technical Specifications
March 2006
near the top. A 5- to 6- inch layer of organic mulch must be placed on
the soil surface around the plant. The plant stem should be upright
upon completion of installation. Trees over five feet tall will require
staking. At a minimum the upper one-third of the burlap shall be
removed and disposed of.
The holes for the B&B trees must not be dug more than a few hours in
advance of planting since it may fill with water preventing planting. If
the hole fills with water during digging, the site is too wet and tree
roots will `drown'. Planting should be delayed until conditions
improve. In addition, leaving a hole overnight may cause frost to build
up in the hole that can damage newly planted tree roots.
Containerized Plants
No planting shall be done when the temperature is below 32°F, when
soil to be excavated for the plant hole is frozen, when the sides or
bottom of the plant hole are frozen, or when the soil to be used for
backfilling is frozen or too wet. In digging, loading, transporting,
unloading, planting, or otherwise handling plants, the Contractor shall
exercise utmost care and use adequate precautions to prevent injury to
or drying out of the trunk, branches, or roots as well as prevent freezing
of the plant roots. Container vegetation must always be handled by the
container and never by the tops of the plants.
Installation of container vegetation shall be located in designated areas
as described in the plans and as directed by the Designer. Soil in the
area of planting shall be loosened to a depth no less than the height of
the container. Container vegetation can be planted in holes made by a
shovel or other means that meet the approval of the Designer. Hoedads
and dibble bars may not be used. The container shall be properly
disposed of.
Container stock shall be planted in a vertical position with the root
collar approximately 0.5 inches below the soil surface. The planting
trench or hole shall be deep and wide enough to permit roots to spread
out and down without J-rooting. After planting, the soil shall be
tamped firmly to eliminate air pockets. A 3- to 4-inch layer of organic
mulch must then be placed on the soil surface around the plant.
All plants will be installed in accordance with the recommendations of
the supplying nursery. If not planted immediately upon delivery to the
job site, the plant material shall be stored out of direct exposure to the
sun and wind and they shall be protected by covering with straw, peat
moss, compost, or other suitable materials and shall be kept moist,
through periodic watering, until the time of planting.
Where plugs. bare roots, and tubers/rhizomes planting is directed,
plants shall be placed in shallow holes so that only sprouts are showing
above the soil. Care should be taken to avoid planting species too deep
or too shallow, and to avoid damage to root systems during planting.
Planting depth should be in accordance with listed references and
supplier recommendations.
4.12 REMOVAL OF NUISANCE VEGETATION
Removal or control of nuisance vegetation shall be performed for a
period of 90 days as necessary to ensure adequate survival of specified
plant species. See SPECIAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS.
4.13 PLANTING PERIOD
The timing of the installation of all plant material onsie shall be
coordinated with the Owner and the Designer.
4.14 WATER FOR PLANTINGS
The contractor shall install a rain gage and collect daily gage readings
at the site. Contractor shall provide initial watering on the day of
planting and thereafter at a minimum rate of V per week (including
rainfall) for a period of 90 days. Water used in the planting or care of
vegetation and plantings shall meet the requirements of Class C fresh
waters as defined in 15 NAC 213.200. See SPECIAL CONTRACT
PROVISIONS.
4.15 SUBMITTALS
Contractor shall submit purchase certificates (or other proof) of all
species planted.
General END OF SECTION
Planting records shall be maintained by the Installer to ensure
appropriate size and percentage of each plant species as described in
the Planting Schedule. Record of nursery or provider shall be
maintained for all plant material. Planting records shall be provided to
the Engineer and Owner upon completion of planting installation.
Unless specifically described on the Planting Plan (as shown for
Specimen Plantings) tree, shrub and herbaceous plantings shall be
randomly intermixed across the Deep Water, Saturated, and Slope
planting zones.
Care should be taken to avoid planting forest species too deep or too
shallow, and to avoid damage to root systems during planting. Planting
depth should be in accordance with listed references, supplier
recommendations, and planting details.
4.11 EMERGENT AND AQUATIC PLANTINGS
Where herbaceous emergent marsh and aquatic marsh planting is
directed, areas shall be planted with plugs, bare roots, tubers/rhizomes
of selected plant species as shown on construction plans. Stems shall
be planted at spacing shown on Drawings.
S&EC Project No. 9325.W 1
Governors Pond Modifications
Technical Specifications
March 2006
s
SECTION 5 - PERMANENT SEEDING
5.1 SECTION INCLUDES
Permanent seeding for permanent site stabilization.
5.2 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT
See SPECIAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS
5.3 REFERENCES
The following Specifications and methods form a part of this
specification:
NCDENR - Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design
Manual
When the Specifications or Drawings differ from the requirements of
the above-referenced documents, the more stringent requirements shall
apply.
5.4 GENERAL
Permanent seeding shall be executed in temporary lined areas and all
other areas which are disturbed during construction activities. In areas
where Erosion Control Matting will be installed (if described elsewhere
in the project specifications), seedbed preparation and seeding shall be
performed prior to the placement of erosion control matting.
5.5 SEEDBED PREPARATION
Complete grading before top soiling or preparing seedbeds. Avoid
creating steep slopes. Areas where seeding will occur on exposed
finished grade shall be disked or harrowed to ensure soil aeration and
to increase the surface roughness prior to planting.
Apply lime (at 1 tons per acre) and 10-10-10 fertilizer (at 1,400 pounds
per acre) evenly across seedbed and work into the top 4-6 inches of soil
by discing or other suitable means. Operate machinery on the contour.
Rework the surface if soil becomes compacted or crusted prior to
seeding. Complete seedbed preparation by breaking up large clods and
raking into a smooth, uniform surface. Fill in or level depressions that
can collect water.
5.6 SEEDING
Apply permanent seeding to seedbed after preparation is complete.
Use certified seed for permanent seeding whenever possible. Certified
seed is inspected by the North Carolina Crop Improvement
Association. It meets published North Carolina Standards and should
bear an official "Certified Seed" label.
Broadcast seed into a freshly loosened seedbed that has not been settled
by rainfall. Mulch must be used on slopes 4H:1 V or steeper and in
areas when concentrated water may flow. Anchor mulch with netting
in areas subject to concentrated flow. In areas with Erosion Control
Matting will be installed, no mulch shall be used and erosion control
matting shall be placed within 24 hours of seeding. Apply seeds and
mulch at the rates indicated below.
Newly constructed embankment and other disturbed areas indicated on
plans:
Rccies
Reed Canary Grass
(Phalaris arundinacea)
Switch Grass
(Panicum virgatum)
Mulch
Grain Straw
Rate (Ibs/acre)
25
25
Rate (7bs/acre)
4000
(2 bales per 1000 square feet)
5.7 SEEDING DATES
Seeding dates given in these seeding Specifications have the best
probability of success.
BEST
15 Feb-15 Mar
POSSIBLE
1 Dec-15 May
Seeding shall be completed within the "possible" range of dates.
5.8 SOIL AMENDMENTS
Apply lime and fertilizer according to soil tests, or apply 1 tons/acre
ground agricultural limestone and 1,400 lb/acre 10-10-10 fertilizer.
5.9 MULCH
Apply grain straw, or equivalent cover of another suitable mulching
material as described above. Anchor mulch by tacking with asphalt,
roving, or netting. Netting shall be used on slopes steeper than 2H:1 V.
END OF SECTION
S&EC Project No. 9325.W 1 Technical Specifications
Governors Pond Modifications 6 March 2006
F
SECTION 6- SITE MAINTENANCE
6.1 SECTION INCLUDES
Site maintenance to ensure vigorous vegetative cover and vegetative
success.
6.2 EXECUTION
Contractor shall revisit the site as required in the special contract
provisions to inspect the condition of the project site. Areas of poor
vegetative cover, displaced or damaged trees, shrubs, and herbaceous
species shall be repaired. Site visits shall be coordinated with Owner.
Erosion areas shall be filled and reseeded in accordance with
SECTION 5 - Permanent Seeding. Areas of poor vegetative cover
shall be reseeded and refertilized only.
Displaced, damaged, or dead plant species shall be removed, and
replanted in accordance with SECTION 4 - Wetland Planting.
END OF SECTION
S&EC Project No. 9325.W 1
Governors Pond Modifications
7
Technical Specifications
March 2006
L
1 2 3

OPEN PLANTING PLACE BARE-ROOT CLOSE HOLE WITH
HOLE WITH SEEDLING IN HOLE - SHOVEL OR AUGER -
SHOVEL, AUGER, OR ROOT COLLAR AT NO AIR SPACE
DIBBLE BAR SURFACE AROUND ROOTS
i
BARE-ROOT SEEDLING PLANTING DETAIL
(NOT TO SCALE)
MULCH BOmm (3') AVG. THICKNE55.
NON-BIODEGRADABLE
MATERIAL SHALL BE TOTALLY REMOVED.
GENTLY COMPACTED TOP501L MUCTURE
TAMPED ADMIXTURE BACKFILL
SHRUB PLANTING - CONTAINERIZED DETAIL
(NOT TO 5CALE)
9325NI I NO5CALE I PLANTING DETAILS 11
PROJ. MGR.: PROJECT:
PK5 GOVERNOR'S VILLAGE
DRA`""z
CW13 GOVERNOR15 POND MODIFICATION5
2 OF 2 ! CHATHAM CTY, NC CLIENT: CE GROUP, INC.
Toll & Environmental Consultants, PA
1010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
rnc:
-?K/VJLJ.W 1/ICCV O
TREE TAPE (3). AVOID TIGHT TAPING A5 IT
PREVENT5 NATURAL SWAY
CROWN OF ROOT BALL 5HALL BE 5ET 5UGHTLY ABOVE GRADE.
MULCH: (4•-67 AVG. THICKNE55
5TAKE5 (3)
WIRE OR ROPE5 AT TOP OF BALL 5HALL BE CUT.
REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF BURLAP.
PREPARED ADMIXTURE BACKFILL OR NATIVE 501L
TAMPED ADMIXTURE BACKFILL
TREE PLANTING - BALL * BURLAP DETAIL
(NOT TO 5CALE)
CROWN OF ROOT BALL SHALL BE 5ET 5UGHTLY ABOVE GRADE.
MULCH: (3'-51 AVG. THICKNE55
PREPARED ADMIXTURE 13ACKFILL OR NATIVE 501L
TAMPED ADMIXTURE BACKFILL
TREE PLANTING - CONTAINERIZED DETAIL
(NOT TO 5CALE)
9325.W1 NO 5CALE PLANTING DETAILS
PROJ. MGR.: PROJECT:
PK5 GOVERNOR'5 VILLAGE
DRAWN: GOVERNOR'S POND MODIFICATIONS
cwB
HE : CUENT:
I OF 2 CHATHAM CTY, NC CE GROUP, INC.
oil & Environmental Consultants, PA
1010 Raven Ridge Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE MANUAL
Governors Village Wet Pond
This manual established procedures for maintenance and operation of the referenced
wet water quality stormwater control measure:
I. Background
The Governors Village development is located within the Jordan Lake Watershed
Protected Area (WSIV, PA).
The pond is designed to treat the 1St one-inch of stormwater off of impervious
surfaces flowing to the pond. The required storage volume of the 1St one-inch is
approximately 223,845 c.f., while approximately 268,592 cf is shown to be
provided between the 6" outflow orifice and the normal pool. The existing outlet
structure consists of 6'x6' (inside dimension) concrete riser with one draw down
orifice that is currently 4". This orifice will be recored to accommodate a 6" PVC
pipe. The existing orifice is at +/- elevation 246.55, which is the current
permanent pool level, This orifice will be grouted closed and a new 6" orifice will
be cored at elevation 243.7. The top of the existing riser is elevation 247.0 This
provides for +/- 3.3 feet of water quality volume that is to draw down within a 2-5
day period. A 10-foot aquatic bench has been provided around the perimeter of
the pond at a proposed elevation of 243.7. The proposed bench slopes 6 to 12-
inches down as it slopes 10-feet toward the interior of the pond. The purpose of
this bench is to encourage aquatic plant life such as reeds and cattails that will
occur naturally and aid in water quality.
Q-100 Storm Post-Developed at existing pond intake 614 cfs
The existing 6x6 box with 42" RCP and concrete emergency spillway can
accommodate 751 cfs
A existing rip-rap dissapator pad, to aid in erosion, has been provided at the
outlet of the barrel from the pond riser structure. The dissapator pad consists of
Class B rip-rap 22-inches deep 4-feet wide at outlet and 40-feet long. This
dissipater is necessary to maintain the integrity of the existing dam embankment
(prevent scour)
Sediment will be required to be removed from the proposed stormwater control
measure wet pond once all surfaces throughout the proposed development have
been permanently stabilized.
H. Maintenance of Embankments
A. Vegetation
The embankment has a ground cover of fescue, which if properly maintained
will prevent erosion of the embankment and provide an easy surface for
inspection. The grass will be most difficult to obtain in the area subject to
water level fluctuation below the top of the riser. Grass should be fertilized
every October and April.
? Re-Seeding - periodically re-seeding may be required to establish grass
on areas where seek did not take or has been destroyed. Before seeding,
fertilizer (12-12-12) should be applied at a minimum rate of 12 to 15
pounds per 1,000 SF. The seed should be evenly sewn at a rate of three
pounds per 1,000 SF. The seed should be covered with soil to the depth
of approximately %". Immediately following the planting, the area should
be mulched with straw.
? Trees & Shrubs - trees, shrubs, and other landscape vegetation should be
permitted only as shown on the approved planting plan.
? Mowing - grass mowing, brush cutting and removal of weed vegetation
will be necessary for the proper maintenance of the embankment. All
embankment slopes and vegetation of spillways should be mowed when
the grass exceeds 8" in height. Acceptable methods include the use of
weed whips or power brush cutters and mowers.
B. Erosion
Erosion occurs when the water concentrates causing failure of the vegetation
or when vegetation dies and sets up the environment for rill erosion and
eventually gullies from the stormwater runoff. The dam should be inspected
for these areas. Proper care of vegetative areas that develop erosion is
required to prevent more serious damage to the embankment. Rills and
gullies should be filled with suitable soil compacted and then seeded.
Methods described in Section I-A, on vegetation, should be used to properly
establish the grass surface. Where eroded areas are detected, the cause of
the erosion should be addressed to prevent a continued maintenance
problem. Frequently problems result from the concentration of runoff to one
point of the embankment crest instead of a uniform distribution of runoff. This
can be corrected by reshaping the crest to more evenly distribute the runoff to
areas, which are not experiencing erosion problems. The top of the dam
should not be allowed to be used for pedestrian or bicycle traffic.
? Abutment Areas -- the abutment is the line formed where the embankment
fill comes into contact with the existing slope. Runoff from rainfall
concentrates in these gutter areas and can reach erosive velocities
because of the steep slopes. If a normal stand of grass cannot be
maintained on the abutments, additional measures may be needed such
as jute matting to provide for the establishment of a good ground cover.
? Upstream Embankment Slope - Erosion problems can develop on the
upstream face of the dam due to the fluctuation of water level in the pond.
This is a result of a combination of wave actions and ground saturation,
2
which occurs from the elevated water levels. The erosion generally
occurs as the water level falls and the saturated ground becomes
subjected to the wave action. If erosion becomes a problem, it may
necessitate the installation of a stone armoring along the zone subject to
fluctuating water level. This would consist of 18" of NCDOT Class B stone
for erosion control underlain with Mirifi 140 geotextile fabric. It should be
centered at the point of the erosion problem and covering an area 2'
above and below the approximate center of the eroded area.
C. Seepage
? Detection - Seepage may vary in appearance from a soft wet area to a
flowing spring. It may show up first as only an area where the vegetation
is more lush and darker green. Cattails, reeds, mosses and other marsh
vegetation often become established in a seepage area. The downstream
abutment areas where the embankment fill and natural ground interface
are very common locations for seepage. Also the contact between the
embankment and the spillway conduit is a very common location, which is
generally attributed to poor compaction around the conduit. Due to the
way in which conduits are put in, this is generally most evident on the
underside of the conduit. Slides may result from excessively saturated
embankment slopes. The natural foundation area immediately
downstream of the dam abutment should also be inspected to ensure that
"piping" is not occurring underneath the embankment. "Piping" may
appear as a "boil" evident as spring carries soil. The soil usually deposits
around the boil area and is evident by the sedimentary deposits
accompanying it. Seepage can also occur into the spillway conduit
through cracks in the pipe or improperly sealed joints. These can be seen
by observing the conduit when the water level is high. The movement of
the water itself is not dangerous, but if soil particles are being carried with
it, then it can create a shortcut for the piping of soil. This might show up
on the upstream face of the embankment roughly along the line of the
conduit itself.
D. Cracks, Slides, Sloughing, and Settlement
? Cracks - the entire embankment should be inspected for cracks. Short,
isolated cracks are usually not significant, but larger cracks (wider than
W), well-defined cracks indicate a serious problem. There are two types
of cracks: transverse and longitudinal.
Traverse cracks appear crossing the embankment and indicated
difference of settlement within the embankment. These cracks
provide avenues for seepage and piping could develop.
Longitudinal cracks run parallel to the embankment and may signal
the early stages of a slide. In recently built structures, these cracks
may be indicative of poor compaction or poor foundation
preparation resulting in consolidation after construction.
? Slides - Slides and slumps are serious threats to the safety of an
embankment. Slides can be detected easily unless obscured by
3
vegetation. Arch shaped cracks are indications that slides are slipping or
beginning to slip. These cracks soon develop into large scarps in the
slope at the top of the slide.
? Settlement - settlement occurs both during construction and after the
embankment has been completed and places in service. To a certain
degree this is normal and should be experienced. It is usually the most
pronounced at the location of maximum foundation depth or embankment
height. Excessive settlement will reduce the free board (difference in
elevation between the water surface and the top of the dam). Any area of
excessive settlement should be restored to original elevation and condition
to reduce the risk of overtopping. A relatively large amount of settlement
(more than 6") within a small area could indicate serious problems in the
foundation or perhaps the lower part of the embankment. Settlement
accompanied by cracking often precedes failure.
? What to do if seepage, cracks, slides or settlement are detected: If any of
the above items are detected there may be signs of significant problems,
which could lead, to the failure of the structure. A geotechnical or civil
engineer should be consulted regarding the origin of these problems and
for the assessment of the appropriate solutions for correcting them. If the
professional is not immediately able to inspect the dam, then the bottom
drain should be opened and the water level lowered to remove the risk of
failure until a professional can observe these problems.
E. Rodent Control
Generally in this urban environment, rodents are not a problem. Rodents
such as ground hogs, muskrats, and beavers are attracted to dams and
reservoirs and can be quite dangerous to structural integrity and proper
performance of the embankment and spillway. Groundhog and muskrats
thrive on burrowing in the manmade earth embankments, which become
pathways for seepage. In the event that burrows are detected within the dam,
then the rodents should be dealt with by removal.
III. MAINTENANCE OF SPILLWAYS & CONTROL STRUCTURES
A. Inspection of Spillway Conduits
Conduits should be inspected thoroughly twice a year. Conduits should be
visually inspected by actually entering the conduit a sufficient distance
between the riser structure and the outlet to check all the joints. Because the
outlet works tie into the street storm sewer system, catch basins and pipes.
Conduit should be inspected for proper alignment (sagging), elongation and
displacement at joints, cracks, leaks, surface water, surface wear, loss of
protective coating, corrosion and blocking. Problems with conduits most often
occur at joints and special attention should be given to them during
inspection. Joints should be checked for gaps caused by elongation or
settlement and loss of joint filler material. Open joints can permit erosion of
the embankment material and possibly the piping of soil material through the
4
joints. Catch basin should be checked for signs that water is seeping along
the exterior surface of the pipe where it enters the catch basin. A depression
in the soil surface over the pipe may be signs that soil is being removed from
around the pipe.
? What to do if problems are detected with the spillway: Retain the
assistance of a civil engineer or geotechnical engineer qualified in the
design of embankments to perform an inspection of the dam. If in doubt,
lower the water surface elevation of the pond until such time as a qualified
professional can perform an inspection.
B. Trashracks on Pipe Spillways
The spillway riser for this dam is the only spillway structure. The intake
structure has been fitted with a trashrack to prevent debris from entering the
spillway structure. Most of the runoff entering the pond comes in through
grated inlets, which have essentially provided filtration of the runoff and
should limit the size of the debris that enters the basin to floating debris,
which will most likely pass through the trashrack. The opening between the
trashrack and riser is smaller than the opening of the outlet pipe. The intent is
that any debris, which passes through the trashrack, will be easily passed by
the pipe outlet.
Maintenance should include periodically checking the rack for rusted or
broken sections and repairing as needed. The trashrack should be checked
frequently during and after storm events to ensure that it is properly
functioning and to remove accumulated debris.
IV. OPERATION
A. Lake Drains
Lake drains should always be operable so that the pool level can be drawn
down in case of an emergency or for repairs or maintenance. Lake drain
valves or gates that have not been operated for a long time present a special
problem. Generally, when draining the pond, it should be drained slowly.
Open the drain until a good flow of water is present but not a torrent, so that
the water level can be drained over a period of 48 hours or more. Rapidly
lowering the water level in the pond can cause permanent damage to the
embankment and must be avoided. The gate valve controlling the lake drain
should be operated from fully closed to fully opened position at least twice a
year.
B. Record Keeping
Operation of a dam should include recording of the following:
? Semi Annual Inspections - Inspections are to be performed by a qualified
registered North Carolina professional engineer, landscape architect, or
surveyor.
5
? Semi Annual Inspection Reports - a collection of written inspection report
should be kept on record in Section IV of this manual. Inspection should
be conducted annually. Copies should be provided to the owner or
homeowner's association.
? Observations - all observations should be recorded. Where periodic
inspections are performed following significant rainfall events, these
inspections should be logged into the Periodic Inspection, Operation &
Maintenance Form in Section IV of this manual.
? Maintenance - written records of maintenance and/or repairs should be
recorded on the Periodic Inspection, Operation & Maintenance Form in
Section IV of this manual.
? Other Operation Procedures - the owner should maintain a complete and
up-to-date set of plans (as-built drawings) and all changes made to the
dam over time should be recorded on the as-builts.
C. Sedimentation & Dredging
Sedimentation from establishing areas tributary to the pond will eventually
result in the reduction of the retention pool and eventually will have to be
removed. The frequency of this sediment removal can be reduced by
ensuring that the site areas around the building be stabilized with a vegetative
ground cover such that it restrains erosion. This would include a periodic
application of fertilizer and other treatments necessary to promote a stable
groundcover and minimize sedimentation to the pond. The maintenance on
this pond requires that when the sediment level (as measured from the top
of the riser to the sediment pool) is within 5-feet of the top of the riser that the
sediment must be removed and the original pond restored. For aesthetic
purposes it may be desirable to maintain it prior to this point. Generally, the
dredging process begins with the removal of as much water as possible from
the deposited silt and so the material can be excavated with conventional
equipment for trucking offsite. The removed material should be hauled offsite
to a suitable landfill site or mounded somewhere on site and stabilized with a
groundcover sufficient to restrain erosion.
D. Responsible Party:
Governors Village Commercial LLC
Attn: Dane Vincent
PO Box X
Hot Springs, VA 24445
6
V. INSPECTION, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE CHECKLISTS
POND INSPECTION CHECKLIST
Date:
Time:
Governors Village Wet Pond
SPILLWAYS - DRAINS - OUTLETS
Check/Circle
Condition Noted Observations Action -
Repair Action -
Monitor Action
Investigative
Principal
Spillway Type:
Trashracks/Debris
Cracks/Deterioration
Joint Deterioration
Improper Alignment
Cracks/Deterioration
Joint Deterioration
Seepage/Piping
Undercutting
Erosion
Debris
Lake
Drain/Other
Outlets Type:
GatesNalves
Operability

General Comments, Sketches & Field Measurements
7
POND INSPECTION CHECKLIST
Governors Village Wet Pond
EMBANKMENT -- POOL
Date:
Time:
Check/Circle Condition
Noted Observations Action -
Repair Action -
Monitor Action
Investigative
U /S Slope Type:
Vegetation/Riprap
Beach ing/sl ides/cracks
Undermining/erosion
Rodent burrows
Crest Type:
Ruts/erosion
Cracks/settlement
Poor alignment
D/S Sloe Type:
Vegetation/erosion
Rodent burrows
Sloughs/slides/cracks
Seepage/wetness
Pool Type:
Erosion/ round cover
Sedimentation
Water quality
Abutment Type:
Vegetation/erosion
Slough/slides/cracks
Seepage/wetness
General Comments, Sketches & Field Measurements
8
PERODIC INSPECTION, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE RECORDS
Governors Village Wet Pond
Date Time Rain " Pool Level Weather General Observations I Recorded By I
Conditions or Comments
Date I Maintenance Performed I Comments I Recorded
Date I Equipment Operated I Comments Recorded
9
R*:-Governors Village, IP # 3539
Subject: RE: Governors Village, IP # 3539
From: "Bob Zarzecki" <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 10:17:00 -0500
To: "John Dorney" <[e-mail]>, "Cynthia.Vanderwiele"
<[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>
Cynthia and I always play well together. Seriously, I appreciate
Cynthia's diligence and professionalism with this project.
Bob Zarzecki
Environmental Specialist
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
-----Original Message-----
From: John Dorney [mailto:[e-mail])
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 10:14 AM
To: Bob Zarzecki; Cynthia.Vanderwiele
Subject: Re: Governors Village, IP # 3539
sweeeeet! looks like you all played well together (probably because i
was not there!). thankx
Bob Zarzecki wrote:
Cynthia:
Thank you for your quick response to Mark's email. I will forward your
response and the concept plan to Todd Tugwell (USACE) today. Assuming
that he agrees to the plan, Mark will complete the final documents and
we should have them back to you soon.
I'll be in touch.
Thanks again for your help with this project.
Bob Zarzecki
Environmental Specialist
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
-----Original Message----'-
From: Cynthia F Van Der Wiele [mailto:[e-mail])
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 4:45 PM
To: markCcegroupinc.com; Bob Zarzecki
Cc: 'Steve Levitas'; Danny Smith; John Dorney
Subject: Re: Governors Village, IP # 3539
Mark and Bob,
Thank you for a productive meeting this afternoon. I have reviewed the
February 1, 2006 WQ Pond and Exhibit map and the supporting
worksheet/calculations based on our discussion earlier today. I
understand that it may be possible to expand the upper pond (extended
detention wetland) somewhat as the walking trail in that area will be
obliterated during the construction. I also understand the
considerable constraints faced when retrofitting a site. The
conceptual plan is an excellent one and I look forward to receiving the
I final design plans, operation & maintenance agreeement, etc. Ido not
1 of 3 5/1/2006 11:20 AM
RE: Governors Village, IP # 3539
see any constraints to approving the final stormwater plan and believe
that it will satisfy the stormwater condition of the 401 Certification.
Kind regards,
Cynthia Van Der Wiele, Ph.D., Environmental Engineer II NCDWQ
401/Wetlands, Express Review Program
Mark Ashness wrote:
Cynthia: thanks for meeting with Bob and myself this afternoon. I just
wanted to review our discussion and furnish you with associated
documents.
Lower Pond (Wet)
* 2.2 surface acre wet pond with a SA/DA for runoff from the 1"
storm with a 2-5 day drawdown period. The temporary pool also
exceeds the wet pond requirements 260,000 CF versus 223,845 CF
required .
* An additional outlet above the temporary pool to accomodate the
100 year storm.
* We will also construct a horseshoe riprap forebay around the
lone pipe from Governors Village Phase 5 that drains directly to
the wet pond. The remainder of drainage will be directed to the
extended detention wetland.
Upper Pond (Extended Detention Wetland)
* The upper pond (extended detention wetland) will act as a
forebay for the lower wet pond. this structure will have a 1.7
AC surface area and store 200,000 CF in the temporary pool.
* A broad spillway will convey larger storm events into the lower
pool. This spillway will be vegetated and have a reinforced
concrete grid for to stabilize the embankment between ponds.
* As we discussed, the upper structure has about 64% of the
surface area required. The temporary pool volume is at 89% of
the volume required.
* We have also maximized the pond footprint inside of the existing
walking trail.
Based upon our discussion, it appears that you are favorable to this
revised plan. If this is the case please confirm with Bob such that he
can coordinate with Todd Tugwell. Once we receive Todd's concurrence,
we will proceed with detailed design plans. S&EC will provide the
planting plan for the wetland system. I agree with you, that the
plantings will need to be well thought out in order to create an

2 of 3 5/1/2006 11:20 AM
R-: Govel-nors Village, IP # 3539
attractive upper pond.
Thanks again for your assistance.
Mark Ashness,
CE Group, INC
11000 Regency
Cary, NC 27511
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
PE ASLA
Parkway, Suite 410
phone
fax
mobile
3 of 3 5/1/2006 11:20 AM
Re: Governors Village, IP # 3539
Subject: Re: Governors Village, IP # 3539
From: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 09:37:23 -0500
To: Danny Smith <[e-mail]>
CC: Cynthia F Van Der Wiele <cynthia. vanderwiele@ncmail. net>
Ditto what Danny said. We really would have preferred to be in your project
meeting. Thank you for handling this very complex project so seamlessly.
Danny Smith wrote:
Cynthia,
HEY Excellent work! It sounds like you really got these guys on track! Sorry for
my absence yesterday... both cyndi and I were in a marathon/mandatory supervisor
meeting (it sucked)... sorry for abandoning you! Regardless, it sounds like you
affected an outstanding result!
danny
Cynthia F Van Der Wiele wrote:
Mark and Bob,
Thank you for a productive meeting this afternoon. I have reviewed the
February 1, 2006 WQ Pond and Exhibit map and the supporting
worksheet/calculations based on our discussion earlier today. I understand
that it may be possible to expand the upper pond (extended detention wetland)
somewhat as the walking trail in that area will be obliterated during the
construction. I also understand the considerable constraints faced when
retrofitting a site. The conceptual plan is an excellent one and I look
forward to receiving the final design plans, operation & maintenance
agreeement, etc. I do not see any constraints to approving the final
stormwater plan and believe that it will satisfy the stormwater condition of
the 401 Certification.
Kind regards,
Cynthia Van Der Wiele, Ph.D., Environmental Engineer II
NCDWQ 401/Wetlands, Express Review Program
Mark Ashness wrote:
Cynthia: thanks for meeting with Bob and myself this afternoon. I just
wanted to review our discussion and furnish you with associated documents.
Lower Pond (Wet)
* 2.2 surface acre wet pond with a SA/DA for runoff from the 1"
storm with a 2-5 day drawdown period. The temporary pool also
exceeds the wet pond requirements 260,000 CF versus 223,845 CF
required .
* An additional outlet above the temporary pool to accomodate the
100 year storm.
* We will also construct a horseshoe riprap forebay around the
lone pipe from Governors Village Phase 5 that drains directly to
the wet pond. The remainder of drainage will be directed to the
extended detention wetland.
Upper Pond (Extended Detention Wetland)
* The upper pond (extended detention wetland) will act as a
forebay for the lower wet pond. this structure will have a 1.7
1 of 2 5/1/2006 11:20 AM
Re: Go,.-emors Village, IP # 3539
AC surface area and store 200,000 CF in the temporary pool.
* A broad spillway will convey larger storm events into the lower
pool. This spillway will be vegetated and have a reinforced
concrete grid for to stabilize the embankment between ponds.
* As we discussed, the upper structure has about 64% of the
surface area required. The temporary pool volume is at 89% of
the volume required.
* we have also maximized the pond footprint inside of the existing
walking trail.
Based upon our discussion, it appears that you are favorable to this revised
plan. If this is the case please confirm with Bob such that he can
coordinate with Todd Tugwell. Once we receive Todd's concurrence, we will
proceed with detailed design plans. S&EC will provide the planting plan for
the wetland system. I agree with you, that the plantings will need to be
well thought out in order to create an attractive upper pond.
Thanks again for your assistance.
Mark Ashness, PE ASLA
CE Group, INC
11000 Regency Parkway, Suite 410
Cary, NC 27511
[phone] phone
[phone] fax
[phone] mobile
2 of 2 5/1/2006 11:20 AM
RE: Governors Village, IP # 3539
Subject: RE: Governors Village, IP # 3539
From: "Bob Zarzecki" <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 09:35:47 -0500
To: "Cynthia F Van Der Wiele" <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>
CC: "Steve Levitas" <[e-mail]>, "Danny Smith" <[e-mail]>,
"John Dorney" <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>
Cynthia:
Thank you for your quick response to Mark's email. I will forward your
response and the concept plan to Todd Tugwell (USAGE) today. Assuming
that he agrees to the plan, Mark will complete the final documents and
we should have them back to you soon.
I'll be in touch.
Thanks again for your help with this project.
Bob Zarzecki
Environmental Specialist
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
-----Original Message-----
From: Cynthia F Van Der Wiele [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 4:45 PM
To: [e-mail]; Bob Zarzecki
Cc: 'Steve Levitas'; Danny Smith; John Dorney
Subject: Re: Governors Village, IP # 3539
Mark and Bob,
Thank you for a productive meeting this afternoon. I have reviewed the
February 1, 2006 WQ Pond and Exhibit map and the supporting
worksheet/calculations based on our discussion earlier today. I
understand that it may be possible to expand the upper pond (extended
detention wetland) somewhat as the walking trail in that area will be
obliterated during the construction. I also understand the considerable
constraints faced when retrofitting a site. The conceptual plan is an
excellent one and I look forward to receiving the final design plans,
operation & maintenance agreeement, etc. I do not see any constraints
to approving the final stormwater plan and believe that it will satisfy
the stormwater condition of the 401 Certification.
Kind regards,
Cynthia Van Der Wiele, Ph.D., Environmental Engineer II NCDWQ
401/Wetlands, Express Review Program
Mark Ashness wrote:
Cynthia: thanks for meeting with Bob and myself this afternoon. I just I
wanted to review our discussion and furnish you with associated I
documents.
Lower Pond (Wet)
* 2.2 surface acre wet pond with a SA/DA for runoff from the 1"
storm with a 2-5 day drawdown period. The temporary pool also
1 of 2 5/1/2006 11:20 AM
RE: Govemors Village, IP # 3539
exceeds the wet pond requirements 260,000 CF versus 223,845 CF
required .
* An additional outlet above the temporary pool to accomodate the
100 year storm.
* We will also construct a horseshoe riprap forebay around the
lone pipe from Governors Village Phase 5 that drains directly to
the wet pond. The remainder of drainage will be directed to the
extended detention wetland.
Upper Pond (Extended Detention Wetland)
* The upper pond (extended detention wetland) will act as a
forebay for the lower wet pond. this structure will have a 1.7
AC surface area and store 200,000 CF in the temporary pool.
* A broad spillway will convey larger storm events into the lower
pool. This spillway will be vegetated and have a reinforced
concrete grid for to stabilize the embankment between ponds.
* As we discussed, the upper structure has about 64% of the
surface area required. The temporary pool volume is at 89% of
the volume required.
* We have also maximized the pond footprint inside of the existing
walking trail.
Based upon our discussion, it appears that you are favorable to this
revised plan. If this is the case please confirm with Bob such that he
can coordinate with Todd Tugwell. Once we receive Todd's concurrence,
we will proceed with detailed design plans. S&EC will provide the
planting plan for the wetland system. I agree with you, that the
plantings will need to be well thought out in order to create an
attractive upper pond.
Thanks again for your assistance.
Mark Ashness, PE ASLA
CE Group, INC
11000 Regency Parkway, Suite 410
Cary, NC 27511
[phone] phone
[phone] fax
[phone] mobile
2 of 2 5/1/2006 11:20 AM
Re: Governors Village, IP # 3539
Subject: Re: Governors Village, IP # 3539
From: Danny Smith <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 09:17:25 -0500
To: Cynthia F Van Der Wiele <[e-mail]>
CC: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
Cynthia,
HEY Excellent work! It sounds like you really got these guys on track! Sorry for my
absence yesterday... both cyndi and I were in a marathon/mandatory supervisor meeting
(it sucked)... sorry for abandoning you! Regardless, it sounds like you affected an
outstanding result!
danny
Cynthia F Van Der Wiele wrote:
Mark and Bob,
Thank you for a productive meeting this afternoon. I have reviewed the February
1, 2006 WQ Pond and Exhibit map and the supporting worksheet/calculations based on
our discussion earlier today. I understand that it may be possible to expand the
upper pond (extended detention wetland) somewhat as the walking trail in that area
will be obliterated during the construction. I also understand the considerable
constraints faced when retrofitting a site. The conceptual plan is an excellent
one and I look forward to receiving the final design plans, operation &
maintenance agreeement, etc. I do not see any constraints to approving the final
stormwater plan and believe that it will satisfy the stormwater condition of the
401 Certification.
Kind regards,
Cynthia Van Der Wiele, Ph.D., Environmental Engineer II
NCDWQ 401/Wetlands, Express Review Program
Mark Ashness wrote:
Cynthia: thanks for meeting with Bob and myself this afternoon. I just wanted
to review our discussion and furnish you with associated documents.
Lower Pond (Wet)
* 2.2 surface acre wet pond with a SA/DA for runoff from the 1"
storm with a 2-5 day drawdown period. The temporary pool also
exceeds the wet pond requirements 260,000 CF versus 223,845 CF
required .
* An additional outlet above the temporary pool to accomodate the
100 year storm.
* We will also construct a horseshoe riprap forebay around the
lone pipe from Governors Village Phase 5 that drains directly to
the wet pond. The remainder of drainage will be directed to the
extended detention wetland.
Upper Pond (Extended Detention Wetland)
* The upper pond (extended detention wetland) will act as a
forebay for the lower wet pond. this structure will have a 1.7
AC surface area and store 200,000 CF in the temporary pool.
* A broad spillway will convey larger storm events into the lower
pool. This spillway will be vegetated and have a reinforced
concrete grid for to stabilize the embankment between ponds.
* As we discussed, the upper structure has about 64% of the
surface area required. The temporary pool volume is at 89% of
1 of 2 5/1/2006 11:19 AM
Re: Govemors Village, IP # 3539
the volume required.
* We have also maximized the pond footprint inside of the existing
walking trail.
Based upon our discussion, it appears that you are favorable to this revised
plan. If this is the case please confirm with Bob such that he can coordinate
with Todd Tugwell. Once we receive Todd's concurrence, we will proceed with
detailed design plans. S&EC will provide the planting plan for the wetland
system. I agree with you, that the plantings will need to be well thought out
in order to create an attractive upper pond.
Thanks again for your assistance.
Mark Ashness, PE ASLA
CE Group, INC
11000 Regency Parkway, Suite 410
Cary, NC 27511
[phone] phone
[phone] fax
[phone] mobile
2 of 2 5/1/2006 11:19 AM
Governors Village, IP # 3539
l
Subject: Governors Village, EP # 3539
From: "Mark Ashness" <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 16:27:06 -0500
To: <[e-mail]>
CC: "'Bob Zarzecki"' <[e-mail]>, "'Steve Levitas"' <[e-mail]>
Cynthia: thanks for meeting with Bob and myself this afternoon. I just wanted to review our discussion and
furnish you with associated documents.
Lower Pond (Wet)
• 2.2 surface acre wet pond with a SA/DA for runoff from the 1" storm with a 2-5 day drawdown
period. The temporary pool also exceeds the wet pond requirements 260,000 CF versus 223,845 CF
required .
• An additional outlet above the temporary pool to accomodate the 100 year storm.
• We will also construct a horseshoe riprap forebay around the lone pipe from Governors Village
Phase 5 that drains directly to the wet pond. The remainder of drainage will be directed to the
extended detention wetland.
Upper Pond (Extended Detention Wetland)
• The upper pond (extended detention wetland) will act as a forebay for the lower wet pond. this
structure will have a 1.7 AC surface area and store 200,000 CF in the temporary pool.
• A broad spillway will convey larger storm events into the lower pool. This spillway will be vegetated
and have a reinforced concrete grid for to stabilize the embankment between ponds.
• As we discussed, the upper structure has about 64% of the surface area required. The temporary
pool volume is at 89% of the volume required.
• We have also maximized the pond footprint inside of the existing walking trail.
Based upon our discussion, it appears that you are favorable to this revised plan. If this is the case please
confirm with Bob such that he can coordinate with Todd Tugwell. Once we receive Todd's concurrence, we
will proceed with detailed design plans. S&EC will provide the planting plan for the wetland system. I agree
with you, that the plantings will need to be well thought out in order to create an attractive upper pond.
Thanks again for your assistance.
Mark Ashness, PE ASLA
CE Group, INC
11000 Regency Parkway, Suite 410
Cary, NC 27511
[phone] phone
[phone] fax
[phone] mobile
I of 2 5/1/2006 11:18 AM
l'
Governors Village Individual Permit
Revised Wet Pond - 01130106
Total Drainage Area - 143.540 Acres
Impervious On-Site Area - 60.570 Acres
Percentage of Impervious Area - 42.2%
1"S(orace Volume
Rv = 0.05+0.009
I = Percent Impervious
Rv = 0.430 (in./in.)
Volume = (Design Rainfalq (Rv) (Drainage Area)
1" Vol. Req.= 5.139 acres
223,845 c.f.
b. Wet Storage Provided
4ant-'Aa pwL., e4 sp.1
Incremental Total Total
_ Elev. Area (st.) Volume (d.) Volume (Cf.) Volume (gal.) Depth (ft.)
243.7 97,804
69,690 89,090 670,881.20 .1
242.7 81,576
79,628 169,318 1,266,498.64 -2
241.7 77,680
75,754 245,082 1,833,209.02 -3
240.7 73,847
71,963 317,045 2,371,492.86 -4
239.7 70,079
68,228 385,272 2,881,834.56 5 Bottom of Pond
238.7 66,376
33,263 418,535 3,130,641.80 -8
237.7 150
110 416,645 3,131,464.60 -7 Bottom of Pump Intake
238.7 70
Average Hydraulic Depth 429 Feet
c. Temporary Storage Provkfed
Incremental Total Total
_ Elev. Area (sf.) Volume (cL) Volume (cf.) Volume (gal.) Depth (ft.)
246.3 108,757
64,518 64,518 482,692.40 2
t 245.7 108,302
104,162 168,679 1,281,720.42 1
244.7 102,021
99,913 268,592 2.009.065.92 0
` 243.7 97,804
d Drawdown of Temporary Storage Pool
Drawdown calculation for 1" Volume
Orifice required for 25 Day Drawdown
260 ft 1.30 ft
6,00 Onfice size Q2-day- 166,174
Q - 1.077 cfs QSday- 485,435
So, On Orifice will dawdown pond in 2.89 days (This references required vokene talc)
Storage deww 2.80 ft
2k 14988
Average head- 1.30 ft
1=2 0.19625 U9ad forQ
J
Governors Village Individual Permit
ED Wetland Pond - 01130106
Total Drainage Area - 143.640 Acres
Impervious OnSlte Area - 60.670 Acres
Percentage of Impervious Area - 42.2%
I" storage VorUrrle
Rv - 0.05+0.009 (1)
I = Percent Impervious
Rv = 0.430 (In.An.)
Volume - (Design Rainfalo (Rv) (Drainage Area)
1" Vol. Req.= 5.139 acres
223,846 0.
b. Wet Storage Provided
Incremental Total Total
_ Elev. Area(st) Volume (CL) VOW me (.1.) Volume (981.) Depth(ft)
245.7 76,614
70,504 70,504 527,369.92 -1
244.7 64.494
63,069 133,573 999,122.30 .2
243.7 61,643
C. Temporary Storage Provided
Incremental Total Total
_ Elev. Area IV.) Volume (ct) Volume (cf.) Volume (gat) Depth (ft)
248.2 84,511
41,848 41,848 313,024.91 2
247.7 82,862
81,275 123,123 920,96191 .1
246.7 79,668
78,091 201,214 1,505,082.59 0
245.7 76,514
d. Drawdown of Temporary storage Pool
Dmwdown calcutatlon for P Volume
Orifice required for 2-5 Day Drawdown
2RO R 1.30 ft
fi00 bi Orifice Siza 02-day= 186,174
Q= 1.077 cls Q5-day= 465.435
So, this Orifice wig drawdown pond la 216 days (This references requ(red volume talc)
Storage depth- 2.80 R Intermim Cala 9.14986
Average head- 1.301[ Orgke Area = 0.19625 Used for 0

- O '

g?N?Z
-+ v}
?.

o C:
n
?
r
z
" 0 ? ?
k.'
( J
M`
wSDrp O

- ZZZ

G-) D
O
w
v z-f?
Q C
- ?o -? D
°o < D
m F
O
z
rn
z
0
0
o
O
U1 O
n
D
r
rn
II
O
N
O
O
j i ' Cy a !
rill
42'ROP fl
?1 t / a/ , b t ???? _ I I
L -
m
O
/ CD' i m
?4?V / Nei p j I 11{f
j kill,
'If l? / ?? r III}I I
\? .? Ali Is! Pit" -n '11 U
{
Zl/
}l/} a f;?'?`t' I / CO
/4 a / r III m r
I
? f'Jr'?? / ? J r ^?.
f /
cly
rn
:D 10, a
23-99
Il ctn '? t- } i Ct)ti.rr,?Frnc-,r
X1111/`p !/ f?i //1
10 1
r I ` {I
1 ?, 1 30X30' ROAD EA5[!! N
1 (P5 96-332)
? t
O??F W A TFRQG Michael F. Easley, Governor
r North Carolina Department of Environment and G. Ross Jr., Natural Resources Secretary
p Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
January 20, 2006
DWQ Project # 05-0810
Chatham County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Mark Ashness, P.E.
CE Group, Inc.
1051 Pemberton Hill Road, Suite 201
Apex, NC 27502
Subject Property: Governors Village
UT to Cub Creek [NEU03, 16-41-2-10-(0.5), WS-IV, NSW]
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Ashness:
On December 19, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) met with you to discuss the
subject property in regard to the conditions of the Individual Water Quality Certification dated
October 3, 2005. Specifically, the discussion centered on the stormwater management
requirements for Governors Village. You proposed to modify the existing pond to meet current
DWQ design requirements as listed within the NC DENR Stormwater Best Management Practice
Manual, including the construction of a forebay and littoral shelf, and accommodation of the
one-inch runoff.
This proposal was further discussed and analyzed by DWQ staff. DWQ has determined that this
proposal is not acceptable because it does not provide the TN removal efficiency rate that is
essential to protect downstream water quality in a watershed with a classification of NSW. In
addition, the 401 Certification that we issued required you to treat untreated stormwater and the
existing pond does provide some stormwater treatment.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Please redesign the existing pond to include an extended detention [constructed] wetland
at the north end of the pond.
2. The existing plan appears to have land area between the pond and the walking trail, and
thus allow for additional expansion of the pond/constructed wetland. Please reconfigure
the pond/constructed wetland to accommodate the volume required by the NC DENR
Stormwater BMP Manual.
One
N na
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
?IICRt'?
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: htti)://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/ 10% Post Consumer Paper
Governors Village.
Page 2 of 2
January 20, 2006
3. Please provide plans and supporting calculations for the design of the stormwater
management facilities, including outlet velocity and protection (to ensure that the stream
below is not scoured).
4. Please provide a signed and notarized Operations and Maintenance agreement for the
stormwater facilities.
Please provide DWQ with one (1) original and three (3) additional copies of this information.
Please contact the DWQ within three (3) weeks of the date of this letter to verify that you have
received this letter. Please contact Ms. Cynthia Van Der Wiele at 919.733.5715 if you have any
questions regarding or would like to set up another meeting to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
1
y, Manag
?Vetlanersite Unit
JRD/ds/cvdw
cc: Bob Zarzecki, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
Todd Tugwell, USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Steve Levitas, Kilpatrick Stockton, LLP, 3737 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 400, Raleigh, NC
27612
Danny Smith, DWQ
File Copy
Filename: 050810GovernorsVillage(Chatham)storm more info
RE: Governors Village
Subject: RE: Governors Village
From: "Bob Zarzecki" <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 14:05:02 -0500
To: "John Dorney" <[e-mail]>, "Cynthia F Van Der Wiele"
<[e-mail]>
CC: <[e-mail]>
If we were applying for GC3402 or a similar general water quality
certification constructed wetlands, bio-retention areas or ponds
followed by forested filter strips would be required to meet the
stormwater condition of the general since the receiving waters were
classified as NSW back in 1983.
However given that this is an Individual Certification, I believe that
you have more latitude of what you can accept, and the condition
approved in the current 401 allows for an alternate plan that provides
for comparable treatment. It should also be noted that this is for the
completion of an existing development previously approved by DWQ back in
1996 and that the applicant has avoided impacts that they were
previously approved to impact back in 1996.
They are proposing to upgrade a pond to provide better treatment for the
entire watershed rather than to install bioretention areas for just a
portion of the watershed. Conceptually this seems to be a better
approach. It's just a matter of how much verification of the improved
treatment you will require.
You can't assume that the existing pond is removing 25% TN unless it is
designed as per the current 1999 BMP manual. Since this pond was
designed in 1996 and constructed in 1997, it did not include many of the
required design parameters listed in the 1999 manual (e.g., forebays,
etc.). We can only assume that it would remove 25% TN if we upgrade it
to current design requirements.
I expect that the TN removal will be the primary topic of our meeting on
the 19th. The project engineer will try to provide as much information
as we can at this time to further our argument that this upgrade will
provide for similar or better TN removal than just providing
bio-retention areas for the single family and townhome sections of the
development.
See you on the 19th.
Bob Zarzecki,
Environmental Specialist
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
-----Original Message-----
From: John Dorney [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 1:08 PM
To: Cynthia F Van Der Wiele
Cc: Bob Zarzecki; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: Governors Village
yup. good catch. thankx
Cynthia F Van Der Wiele wrote:
Also, the water quality classification for that watershed would
dictate the use of a stormwater wetland or bioretention rather than a
pond in the first place.
John Dorney wrote:
1 of 3 5/1/2006 11:17 AM
RE: Govemors Village
my general concern is was this pond required to be constructed for
stormwater management. if it was, then your client is not treating
untreated stormwater. if it was constructed to treat stormwater and
you want to make it better treatment, then account only for the
increased efficiency in treatment rather than saying the stormwater
was untreated. does that make any sense? maybe the caffeine has not
quite kicked in.
Bob Zarzecki wrote:
Cynthia:
I'm working on the Governors Village project. The 2005
Certification was approved with a condition to provide stormwater
for the new single family and townhome sections of Governors
Village. The applicant has proposed to update an existing
stormwater pond constructed in 1997 to current DWQ 1999 BMP Manual
design requirements. The pond treats the entire Governors Village
development and some off site areas. We met with Danny regarding
this proposed alternative and he was agreement with the concept but
wanted to see the details. The engineer provided Danny with the
information that he requested. I understand that Danny has
discussed this with you and John Dorney and that you two have
concerns over the proposed plan. We now have a meeting scheduled
for December 19th at 3 pm to discuss your concerns. Could you
provide me with a specific list of your concerns? We would like to
see if we can address them before the meeting if at all possible.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
Bob Zarzecki
Environmental Specialist
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 11010 Raven Ridge Road Raleigh,
NC 27614
Phone: (919)
Phone: (919)
Fax: (919)
Mobile:(919)
Wr:w.SandEC.c
846-5900 ext. 317 (Main)
256-4517 (Direct)
846-9467
270-2068
om
This electronic communication, including all attachments, is
intended only for the named addressee (s) and may contain
confidential information. This electronic communication may not have
passed through our standard review/quality control process. Design I
I data and recommendations included herein are provided as a matter of
convenience and should not be used for final design. Rely only on
final, hardcopy materials bearing the consultant's original
signature and seal. If you are not the named addressee (s), any use,
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
prohibited. If you have received this electronic communication in
error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the
original communication from your system. Thank you.
2 of 3 5/1/2006 11:17 AM
(.oE Group, inc.
LAND USE EVALUATION
CIVIL ENGIN1=1=fZING
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
November 21, 2005
Mr. Danny Smith
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Center Drive
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
L?
IuOV 2 2 ZQO5
HNR - l° ATER U ?l ITv
WETLANDS ;.,:D Re: Governors Village, DOA Action ID 200520149, DWQ Project # 20050810
Chatham County, NC
Dear Mr. Smith:
On October 3, 2005, The Division of Water Quality approved a 401 Certification for the
above-referenced project with additional conditions. A site plan for the specific project is
included as Exhibit B. One of the conditions (Stormwater Management #7) required the
applicant to design and construct facilities capable of removing 85% TSS coupled with a
forested filter strip. This requirement was placed upon two new proposed residential sections
(49 single family lots and 76 residential townhomes). With the knowledge of existing site
constraints and an existing permitted stormwater facility adjacent to each of these proposed
phases, the Division also acknowledged that, in lieu of the required stormwater treatment for
the two new sections, the applicant could treat an equivalent amount of untreated onsite
stormwater to offset the proposed impervious surface area from the future single family and
townhomes.
Based upon this allowance within the condition, we propose to achieve an equivalent or
better outcome than that required by the 401 condition by providing additional treatment of
stormwater from the existing development. As we discussed at our meeting with you on
November 4, 2005, we will do so by utilizing the existing stormwater pond, which will be
modified as described herein and as depicted in Exhibit E. The existing pond does not meet
the current design requirements as described within the N.C. DENR Stormwater BMP
Manual and as such can not assume the TSS or TN removal efficiencies allocated by the
DWQ.
If determined to be acceptable by the DWQ, we will modify the existing pond to meet current
DWQ design requirements as listed within the N.C. DENR Stormwater BMP Manual. This
will include the construction of forebays and a littoral shelf. Also, while the existing pond has
an adequate surface area to meet the SA/DA requirements for 0.5" to 1", the existing
temporary pool can only accommodate up to 0.5" of runoff from impervious areas. With an
adjustment to the exiting riser structure the temporary pool will be able to accommodate up
to 1" of runoff from impervious areas. This increase in the temporary pool and with the
addition of a forebay and littoral shelf, the pond will achieve the current DWQ design
requirements and can assume an 85% TSS removal and 25% TN removal credit for the
1051 Pemberton Hill Road, Suite 201 - Apex, N.C. 27502
Voice [phone] - Fax [phone] - email [e-mail]
entire watershed, including the two new sections. Exhibit D reflects the impacts of the entire
watershed.
Exhibit A and C present the amount of Total Nitrogen reduction achieved by (i) using of a
wet pond followed by a forested filter strip to treat stormwater from only the proposed 76 Unit
Townhome and 49 lot residential subdivision (the minimum required to satisfy the stormwater
condition of the approved 401 Certification), and (ii) by making the proposed improvements
to the existing stormwater pond as described above. The following table summarizes this
analysis:
WQ Improvement TN Generated TN Removed
GV Single Family PH 5 and 264.1 Ibs/yr 105.6 Ibs/yr
GV Townhome PH 3
Gov. Village with Full Buildout 1371.9 Ibs/yr 343 Ibs/yr
and Exist. Stormwater Pond Upgrade
Thus, by making the proposed modifications to the existing pond, we are tripling the nitrogen
reduction that would be achieved if we only treated the stormwater from the proposed new
sections. (Note: While the current pond does not qualify for any nitrogen removal credit,
even if you assume that it is actually achieving a 15% nitrogen removal rate, our proposal
would still result in greater additional nitrogen removal than that achieved by addressing the
new sections alone.)
If you are in agreement with our proposed approach, we will prepare detailed calculations
and plans suitable for review and approval by your staff. We will also present this
information to the USACE for their use in their review and anticipated approval of the 404
Individual Permit.
Respectfully submitted,
CE Group, Inc.
tMarkAshness, PE
CC: Steve Levitas, Bob Zarzecki, Todd Tugwell (USACE)
R,Lb I bit "'*X '
0
m
.n
E
a?
0
z
L
N
:...
c? T N IT d' CD rn M OO i:Lo
N Gfl LO Q
CL ; N r
K E?
w ov
z

CO N N
_
O >+
N
O Q CL
X
W
z
N

m
J N: I- LO
LL

L N
O
/?
IL
fA
L0
F
L
m
0
c

O d
E
a

c d 0 C
a)
_ / W
a) ~

w
C
E

w
.
z O
O N
Q
O L
0 0
O
C O
0
p 4)
O N
(D
o. a

a?
0
0
c
U) m t: a
m
E a m
° N
? t:

11
0
0
a?
cn
F-
o fy)
0 o
m
c
O 0 c
V y.,r U
0
>,
0 0
a- t

n

`

c
0
o

c c

0
O _ _>, .
w (
O z o z o 0
=
.?
O cu
Q)
a)
Z
0
z
o
z z
Q 5
0 ? Q
E o
N w
F- 4_
u
i a. co to N U) F-
Q m U
c
0
w
U
3
v
m
c
m
0
z
0
H
M
w
ixl?
?,Si?,' ?,:, "'1, ?'1 ? ?,?, ,Af?t?'"? P,t?. :$sf r;{'' ;s'"d"'?'s' , rn*,,cwgr 'a?.'?r.a,?'.. ,?'?A '?f;, ?x.'ar ABS'?i -3H6?,?:t?, m' +??• '>'S"d'£•.y?Id"ri•?'?
, v,- ..k e r Kai,
V
1
nj„ ; Ja1?3?s
ti
I L ? ?1
? 1 i I ra?? ?
?' ?- N 11 t?? f i 7f
iY?eWYp+kYyt -,
f.p
7V •
' ch G) *M
y ., (9ejoe V ee s,empne puod •xe)
t'x ONOd NUVMW11018•X3 , rl
I 1 _
:. , w?,•TM, ? ? ..r..?.? .ten ,? ` ? "utrn;;?S
e O I
r
r ' r a
14,
f,Nr ? l l QQ of ar4 ?"
s
- ..r v
61 (V CD Cn .? 70 iv - . fV' C0 1" t CA Z
(Cpl1 (fir t? o fs ((pp n t? Q
UY N ?` tit) N N N ,p{.?
AMA.
-t rn 0
_
3
A' t p i

a
?
°' 1 ?r rlI
r
'
EXHIBIT MAP B
Z Governors Village Single Family Phase V Group, inc.
7 LAND U5L r-VALUATION
Governors Village Townhomes Phase III CIVIL ENGINEMKING
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
SCALE: 1 " ¦ 200' 1051 Pemberton ndi Rood - 5UU 201 Apo. MC 27502
vaee [phone]- fa [phone]

E?1 bl t nGp
LO
0
r
E
()
O
Z
a
a)
12
O
c
L
d
O
O
M? `Iy
W Q
j ?
LL 00
ca ?
?LL
O
Q.
3
Z
Q ?
W i
V O
O
V
N
O
CL N
W 0 fl
w
Z
C[)
L
N
.Q
C? I? C]
ti co ce)
r
T
%M.

r r
N
r

O t?
CL (U
X
W
Z
H
CO
r
N
L C)
Q
d
O
U
J
O
m
FT-
N
CD
N
r
N
Iq
O
CO
c

Q c
O Q

a) O

rn
c
'
O N
7 E

N
U U
a) a) U
*6 0
c9

a a ?

15 E N
?
N
c a)
c ?
m cu Z

E v a)
E 5
i
a
cm - N
a) CL
CL CL N E
Q m U
r.
4)
E
IQ
w
O
CL
N >
c
L >
F- 0
C E
d a)
I
0
Z o
iv
O
r Z
? o
7
f/) N
ca
t.'
O
O.
N
c
V
F
d
Z
r
O
F
c
O
7
d
a7
z
m
O
H
0
Group, Inc
LAND USE EVALUATION
CIVIL ENGINEEfZING
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
Transmittal
TO: NC DENR, DWQ
Wetlands & Stormwater Branch
12th Floor Archdale Bldg.
Hand Delivery
ATTENTION: Danny Smith
DATE: 11/21/05
PROJECT NO: 1 00_03
RE: Governors Village IP
DWQ # 20050810
Chatham County, NC
Quantity Drawing No. Description
3 sets Stormwater, Preliminary Plan & Response
REMARKS Danny:
Call if you have any questions or require additional information.
Thank you for your help with this matter.

CC
r up, inc.
Signed -
ar P. Ashness, PE
1051 Pemberton Hill Road, Suite 201 Apex, N.C. 27502 919-367-8790 voice 919-367-8791 fax
P:1100 ( GovClub) - Archived 050302\100-03 (GCconst) -Archived 050302\Gov Village Phase 5\PermitsMetland Permitting\051121 DS.doc
Group, inc
LAND USE EVALUATION
CIVIL ENGINEERING
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
Transmittal
TO: NC DENR, DWQ
Wetlands & Stormwater Branch
12th Floor Archdale Bldg.
Hand Delivery
ATTENTION: Danny Smith
DATE: 11/21/05
PROJECT NO: 100-03
RE: Governors Village IP
DWQ # 20050810
Chatham County, NC
Quantity Drawing No. Description
3 sets Stormwater, Preliminary Plan & Response
REMARKS Danny:
Call if you have any questions or require additional information.
Thank you for your help with this matter.
CC:' G ", up, inc.
Signed/
hark P. Ashness, PE
1051 Pemberton Hill Road, Suite 201 Apex, N.C. 27502 919-367-8790 voice 919-367-8791 fax
P:1100 ( GovClub ) -Archived 050302\100-03 (GCconst) - Archived 0503021Gov Village Phase 51PermitsMetland PermittingAr051121 OSAoc
Group,,,,.
LAND USE EVALUATION
CIVIL ENGINI=1=(ZING
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
November 21, 2005
Mr. Danny Smith
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Center Drive
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
t"o V 9 2 2005
c4:} a e.
Re: Governors Village, DOA Action ID 200520149, DWQ Project # 20050810
Chatham County, NC
Dear Mr. Smith:
On October 3, 2005, The Division of Water Quality approved a 401 Certification for the
above-referenced project with additional conditions. A site plan for the specific project is
included as Exhibit B. One of the conditions (Stormwater Management #7) required the
applicant to design and construct facilities capable of removing 85% TSS coupled with a
forested filter strip. This requirement was placed upon two new proposed residential sections
(49 single family lots and 76 residential townhomes). With the knowledge of existing site
constraints and an existing permitted stormwater facility adjacent to each of these proposed
phases, the Division also acknowledged that, in lieu of the required stormwater treatment for
the two new sections, the applicant could treat an equivalent amount of untreated onsite
stormwater to offset the proposed impervious surface area from the future single family and
townhomes.
Based upon this allowance within the condition, we propose to achieve an equivalent or
better outcome than that required by the 401 condition by providing additional treatment of
stormwater from the existing development. As we discussed at our meeting with you on
November 4, 2005, we will do so by utilizing the existing stormwater pond, which will be
modified as described herein and as depicted in Exhibit E. The existing pond does not meet
the current design requirements as described within the N.C. DENR Stormwater BMP
Manual and as such can not assume the TSS or TN removal efficiencies allocated by the
DWQ.
If determined to be acceptable by the DWQ, we will modify the existing pond to meet current
DWQ design requirements as listed within the N.C. DENR Stormwater BMP Manual. This
will include the construction of forebays and a littoral shelf. Also, while the existing pond has
an adequate surface area to meet the SA/DA requirements for 0.5" to 1", the existing
temporary pool can only accommodate up to 0.5" of runoff from impervious areas. With an
adjustment to the exiting riser structure the temporary pool will be able to accommodate up
to 1" of runoff from impervious areas. This increase in the temporary pool and with the
addition of a forebay and littoral shelf, the pond will achieve the current DWQ design
requirements and can assume an 85% TSS removal and 25% TN removal credit for the
1051 Pemberton Hill Road, Suite 201 - Apex, N.C. 27502
Voice [phone] - Fax [phone] - email [e-mail]
entire watershed, including the two new sections. Exhibit D reflects the impacts of the entire
watershed.
Exhibit A and C present the amount of Total Nitrogen reduction achieved by (i) using of a
wet pond followed by a forested filter strip to treat stormwater from only the proposed 76 Unit
Townhome and 49 lot residential subdivision (the minimum required to satisfy the stormwater
condition of the approved 401 Certification), and (ii) by making the proposed improvements
to the existing stormwater pond as described above. The following table summarizes this
analysis:
WQ Improvement TN Generated TN Removed
GV Single Family PH 5 and 264.1 Ibs/yr 105.6 Ibs/yr
GV Townhome PH 3
Gov. Village with Full Buildout 1371.9 Ibs/yr
and Exist. Stormwater Pond Upgrade
343 Ibs/yr
Thus, by making the proposed modifications to the existing pond, we are tripling the nitrogen
reduction that would be achieved if we only treated the stormwater from the proposed new
sections. (Note: While the current pond does not qualify for any nitrogen removal credit,
even if you assume that it is actually achieving a 15% nitrogen removal rate, our proposal
would still result in greater additional nitrogen removal than that achieved by addressing the
new sections alone.)
If you are in agreement with our proposed approach, we will prepare detailed calculations
and plans suitable for review and approval by your staff. We will also present this
information to the USACE for their use in their review and anticipated approval of the 404
Individual Permit.
Respectfully submitted,
CE Group, Inc.
- > ( s2n--
Mark . *As-hPE
CC: Steve Levitas, Bob Zarzecki, Todd Tugwell (USACE)

Ev?h i bit ?+:'
N
0
v
a)
s
E
a)
0
Z
a
m
O
C
L
d
O
L
A
N
.Q
(D (D OR T. o r (D ?e l(G.

t: C14 rl- ce)
Nr
04 (D
(D 00
0) CF)
CY)
co
Lo
0
CL
W i
of N r ?

Z
F "-

(D N N
O ? N
Q CL
X
N
J z
I--

m
J I,- LO
Uft

F `
a U

O
? a)
Q.
C O
L O !/1 O
G1

_ /
? CL
0 c
L
O a)

O .
..
O 0

c
a)
0
ca
L
U
rn 0 _
a d
0-
N a > c

W

O

L

d

a
a)
U

O
a)
U

N

(II
-
(Q

O

C _
-
>

O O

Q'

U
7
? A L Q) a) aJ h-
C
)
V

O yr
ftft
• V

C 0
CL 0
CL

O

C 0
co
O

C

d

a1
J T
a) T
a) Z 0 Z 2 0
= 0

CO o
C ca 0
E U `m 0
E U Z
a) c
m z

\ o 'z

\° z

O z

N
Z >.
F- a) Q
a v7 a) C-
a co E
co Lo
N
CO O
N +
a
O
F- O
F-
Q m V
0
f
i ??ING TOWNHOM S
?> , r' `? ?{ ! 1 f i l 1 / { I I ad?l foreJaay
f
p I t " 10' littoral
1 "' y iJ { shelf _ r? ( Ji 1 F r B
/I k / - i ?lI Ji ? I ?
if / 14
f 1
Ft? T 1 J I x m /rl I t ?, s
14 T
!Cb f
? ? 1 1 0 1` ?{ ? I I 1 t? °IJ = ? 111I
1 I 1 .+ ,
e ?>+l _ 11 "per M??.
m jj? t j t t t y
} ?' / r i { ??} I( O,g 11 , I III{: ? `?_ ??.. '
40
-
' c
(D 4C.
'Aw
NOTES:
I) Add 10' littoral
1 ( *.?c cr toe 'pll w f / i
shelf at perimeter - ?L
of ex. pond. r -? ti z
2) Add forebay.
3) Increase hei ht
r
'k ZOO
of--ri5er box to
Store I volume.
ex. channel
EXHIBIT MAP E
Proposed Stormwater Pond Group, inc.
LAND U5E EVALUATION
Modifications CIVIL ENGINEERING
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
SCALE. 1 " 100' 1051 Pemberton Hill Road - Dude 201 Apex, NC 27502 f
NORTH voice [phone]- W [phone] i
ne n
In
0
0
Z
N
N
O =?
X
W 0
Z
H

r ?
O t!
O °

X N
' Z

r O

ti
J 00

00
v
L
CL
m
c?
N
LO
c
L
d
O
L

N

ti ao r v co
e M
M
M C M
T T
A
N
r
N
IT
O
N
r
N
O
O
O m

C

v^? Was

C

C

d
~

C
d
Z L
a? Q

O $

p o

c a

Q?
ftftft
ftftft -2

U) "D

c
a`
o

coo
E Q
N
O C

2
U) c -
05 CL

L :•
0
o
i
= 0 0
a
co ?

w

c c

m c

m
J

`~ c

N C

N

O Z

R
0
.`. O O
LL

?.
O
O
a.
(D
E
N a)
E M _
Z
a
O
.0
Z
00, Z

.`°.
O Z

O
? a fn E in N I- F
-
4 00 U
V
.dam
Grou inc.
p?
LAND USE EVALUATION
CIVIL ENGINEERING UP 2 l? '. tlt
t/
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT LJ
November 21, 2005
?vEzurais,-u,?
Mr. Danny Smith LPwr41
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Center Drive
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Re: Governors Village, DOA Action ID 200520149, DWQ Project # 20050810
Chatham County, NC
Dear Mr. Smith:
On October 3, 2005, The Division of Water Quality approved a 401 Certification for the
above-referenced project with additional conditions. A site plan for the specific project is
included as Exhibit B. One of the conditions (Stormwater Management #7) required the
applicant to design and construct facilities capable of removing 85% TSS coupled with a
forested filter strip. This requirement was placed upon two new proposed residential sections
(49 single family lots and 76 residential townhomes). With the knowledge of existing site
constraints and an existing permitted stormwater facility adjacent to each of these proposed
phases, the Division also acknowledged that, in lieu of the required stormwater treatment for
the two new sections, the applicant could treat an equivalent amount of untreated onsite
stormwater to offset the proposed impervious surface area from the future single family and
townhomes.
Based upon this allowance within the condition, we propose to achieve an equivalent or
better outcome than that required by the 401 condition by providing additional treatment of
stormwater from the existing development. As we discussed at our meeting with you on
November 4, 2005, we will do so by utilizing the existing stormwater pond, which will be
modified as described herein and as depicted in Exhibit E. The existing pond does not meet
the current design requirements as described within the N.C. DENR Stormwater BMP
Manual and as such can not assume the TSS or TN removal efficiencies allocated by the
DWQ.
If determined to be acceptable by the DWQ, we will modify the existing pond to meet current
DWQ design requirements as listed within the N.C. DENR Stormwater BMP Manual. This
will include the construction of forebays and a littoral shelf. Also, while the existing pond has
an adequate surface area to meet the SA/DA requirements for 0.5" to T', the existing
temporary pool can only accommodate up to 0.5" of runoff from impervious areas. With an
adjustment to the exiting riser structure the temporary pool will be able to accommodate up
to 1" of runoff from impervious areas. This increase in the temporary pool and with the
addition of a forebay and littoral shelf, the pond will achieve the current DWQ design
requirements and can assume an 85% TSS removal and 25% TN removal credit for the
1051 Pemberton Hill Road, Suite 201 -Apex, N.C. 27502
Voice [phone] - Fax [phone] - email [e-mail]
entire watershed, including the two new sections. Exhibit D reflects the impacts of the entire
watershed.
Exhibit A and C present the amount of Total Nitrogen reduction achieved by (i) using of a
wet pond followed by a forested filter strip to treat stormwater from only the proposed 76 Unit
Townhome and 49 lot residential subdivision (the minimum required to satisfy the stormwater
condition of the approved 401 Certification), and (ii) by making the proposed improvements
to the existing stormwater pond as described above. The following table summarizes this
analysis:
WQ Improvement TN Generated TN Removed
GV Single Family PH 5 and 264.1 Ibs/yr 105.6 Ibs/yr
GV Townhome PH 3
Gov. Village with Full Buildout 1371.9 Ibs/yr
and Exist. Stormwater Pond Upgrade
343 Ibs/yr
Thus, by making the proposed modifications to the existing pond, we are tripling the nitrogen
reduction that would be achieved if we only treated the stormwater from the proposed new
sections. (Note: While the current pond does not qualify for any nitrogen removal credit,
even if you assume that it is actually achieving a 15% nitrogen removal rate, our proposal
would still result in greater additional nitrogen removal than that achieved by addressing the
new sections alone.)
If you are in agreement with our proposed approach, we will prepare detailed calculations
and plans suitable for review and approval by your staff. We will also present this
information to the USACE for their use in their review and anticipated approval of the 404
Individual Permit.
Respectfully submitted,
CE Group, Inc.
Mark hness PE
CC: Steve Levitas, Bob Zarzecki, Todd Tugwell (USACE)
2 ?y \Ur

6?
10 '4
O'd
1eG (? sll
9:imb i bit "X"
O
a?
E
a)
O
Z
i
I
CL
m
O
L
O!
CO
N
O 3?
CL E
Lx O
z
I

O

0
O O
0
11 °'

U
z
y
V F
..
W ?1
v
U
M cv
i ?
V
a a7

O aa
AA++
W C
O
O
.a
0 a)

c
W
0
U
0
v O
U 0

J
N
c
O
al N
Z a
N
.G
m (D 00 m
IT w 0) m
N CD r- LO Q ,
N r r
N N
? r
N
v
a)
_O.

0

m
O) yN,

O

a

o
0 O

.C
a)

N
d fn

U-
p
°'

rn =
cc

F-
L
d
R
c
cu
E

L)

0
O

N

a)

a3 CL
_

i

_

N
0 (D

O

)

c V-
°_
N

~

C
O
o w

O

E

a)

c
o

M
=

V
F-
_
a>

N
N
C
cc 9
Co
O

Q Z
!E
O
:_
o
Z
o Z

co o

Z
o O

Z
+?'
U) a co 0- E N N U) N ?0
-
0o ci
U
3
d
c
O
Im
Z
m
O
L
UP 171
L k.
T
Fg
(r
�0twf" f 9:`y t t7 �. ;' ri i 1 r, t :•i ' x t,�drN'`Fa'ch
s
�Juad •xe)f,l,
O�VOd a31VMWat ;B 'X3 "" It
q I 4q
1 JIP
49rt9 `ss •?j
f -lot
rn
y
hh
hi li �i �i Q ti O G)
c
lJr N Ui N N U� N u' t1� C` m
...ern 0
f
cb
LO U
rn
i
EXHIBIT MAP B
z F mii Phase V GrOU.�J, 1110. 1
c Governors Village Single a y
LAND U5f_ eVALUATION
® Governors Village Townhomes Phase III CIVIL f=NC�INEEfRING
CON5TRUCTI0N MANAGEMENT
SCALE • 1 " = 200' 1051 Pemberton HAI Rad-'�1wfs 201 Apar. NC 27502
• vo,c [phone]- SIM [phone]
F k
?a
t
Fg
(r
�0twf" f 9:`y t t7 �. ;' ri i 1 r, t :•i ' x t,�drN'`Fa'ch
s
�Juad •xe)f,l,
O�VOd a31VMWat ;B 'X3 "" It
q I 4q
1 JIP
49rt9 `ss •?j
f -lot
rn
y
hh
hi li �i �i Q ti O G)
c
lJr N Ui N N U� N u' t1� C` m
...ern 0
f
cb
LO U
rn
i
EXHIBIT MAP B
z F mii Phase V GrOU.�J, 1110. 1
c Governors Village Single a y
LAND U5f_ eVALUATION
® Governors Village Townhomes Phase III CIVIL f=NC�INEEfRING
CON5TRUCTI0N MANAGEMENT
SCALE • 1 " = 200' 1051 Pemberton HAI Rad-'�1wfs 201 Apar. NC 27502
• vo,c [phone]- SIM [phone]

e*11, 11 'Irmo"
N
N O 1? O 0! C
cr)
0 r v 00 M `
ti 00
t: cn N M 04
°. E
O- M O M
x 0 -2 r r
z w
a
d
O
c ;
m
>
O

cD N N
O C
O 7 O C
N
X
Z

Ca 0

ti N C
co V-
CD C)
CD

m

I? LL,

O
3
c?

?
Q C
0
o
r-
a

w

o

E
m
R
Z }
?
}
v/
m
3 o

cu O

a` a??i

? F

$
N c
ca
E O
a
fo t
o
c

1Z

O

O

O

N
=
~
-
O O
CL
C
..
?i
?11 O V p p cu 1-

O

V
a
>,
O
>,

U) 0)
O
•'
C
C!
C
M
J 3 Z a)
00 O
6. O
U.

?
c a)
c (D
c 0
z
o
z 24
z
z
c
A CL m

w
? Co

a)
a a

9 .0
R
H d u
i d c U) N F- F-
Q m U
a
r ' ING TOWNHOMES a
??'"`' ?.,.: ?- / ''' l r ? ? I I !t' ? ? ? ? (? I I I I , • r` ?I ?I f=
t /J - \??? # f I I I I,?L': _ \° \\` *?• ..?.. ripe' ?l/ % J ?` ` f t 1 r
Sl G)
?` } I j I III ( i } N ... ..'? I I
ad foray
ff,r`
`? ?t % i 1 t ? 111, 10 littoral
shelf
?? ?? ???? r I ?! /I )) l f / 711 IIII?yIgR
I P} t t ? l , i ?y r? r
Ft?Tt)?&
X l l ?t l r` t /. I IA I,..
?• r, fY v? / f t a #?r ! 4
CL
I ? ?? 1 ? X11.1 I tt / if X
Sol
05 17
f 1 1fi x ! i?f I ?t11 ?_??._
s r lI 1! n >r
-3 \4k
NOTES: _
Add 10' littoral
'Pi
shelf at perimeter - -
of ex. pond. o iw
2) Add forebay. /
263) Increase height °??°'r/ /
Q.f__rlser box to _11-
store I "volume.
?-- ex. channel
EXHIBIT MAP E
Proposed Stormwater Pond Group, inc.
LAND USE EVALUATION
Modifications CIVIL ENGINEERING
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
NORTH SCALE: 1 " =100' 1051 Pemberton MITI Road- 9udc 201 Apex, NC 27502
w" [phone]- tax [phone]

DS -08tQ
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Richard B. Hamilton, Executive Director
MLMORANDUM a0m 9 o [a DO
TO: Mr. Todd Tugwell, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office JUN 2 0 2005
--?. y C/ ores of Engineers
U .S
FROM: Shan L. Bryant, Piegion Coordinator WMM µp -WATER 6RANCH
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: 15 June 2005
SUBJECT: Public Notice for Governors Club Limited Partnership for Construction of Governors
Village Subdivision (After-the-Fact), Chatham County, North Carolina. Action ID No.
200520149
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
subject document and we are familiar with the habitat values of the area. Our comments are provided in
accordance with provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (as amended), Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d), and North Carolina General Statutes (G.S, 113-131
et seq.).
The project is a mixed use development including single and multi-family residential units and
commercial space. Two stream channels flow through the site into a large stormwater pond. The
applicant had received permit authorization for all existing and proposed impacts. However, the
authorization expired before all impacts were completed. One of the road crossings was constructed after
permit authorization expired. The applicant is applying for reauthorization for the unauthorized road
crossing and all remaining impacts. Proposed impacts to stream channels resulting from placement of fill
material, culverts, rip rap and/or utility lines totals 202 linear feet, including 54 linear feet of temporary
impact. Proposed impacts to wetlands resulting from the placement of culverts, fill material, rip rap, and
utility lines totals 0.365 acre including 0.034 acre of temporary impact. The applicant proposes 1:1
mitigation for impacts to stream channels and wetlands associated with the project by providing payment
into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) for the restoration of 148 linear feet
of stream channel and 0.365 acre riparian wetlands. No mitigation for impacts to open waters has been
proposed.
Unnamed tributaries to Cub Creek flow through the site. Cub Creek is a headwater tributary to
the upper New Hope Creek arm of B.E. Jordan Reservoir in the Cape Fear River basin. The upper New
Hope Creek arm of B.E. Jordan Reservoir is on the State's 303(d) list of impaired waters. There are
records for the federal and state threatened bald eagle (Hallaeetus leucocephalus) near the project site.
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries - 1721 Mail Service Center - Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
Page 2
15 June 2005
Governor's Village
Action ID No. 200520149
Additionally, B.E. Jordan Reservoir supports a diverse fishery including largemouth bass (Micropterus
salmoides), crappie (Pomoxis spp.), sunfish (Lepomis spp.), catfish (Ictalww spp.) and striped bass
(Moron saxatilis).
We hesitate to concur with the piping of stream channels due to the potential for long-term and
cumulative impacts. Stream piping and placing fill in aquatic resources can result in significant negative
impacts to downstream areas and eliminate fish and wildlife habitat. Stream piping reduces.the
infiltration of stormwater and associated pollutants, as well as the dissipation of stream energy. Piping a
stream and placing it underground removes both aquatic and terrestrial habitat. Piping a stream channel
and filling the wetlands will alter the hydrology of the existing channel and eliminate beneficial functions.
Likewise we hesitate to concur with the filling of wetlands due to their wildlife habitat value and the well-
known beneficial functions that they provide for flood control and water quality protection. Changes in
land use from a primarily forested area to an urban landscape may exacerbate channel degradation and
sediment impacts to stream ecosystems due to increased stormwater runoff. Multiple studies have shown
that stream degradation occurs at 10% impervious (Schueler 1994; Arnold and Gibbons 1996; Doll et al.
2000; Mallin et al. 2000; May and Horner 2000; Stewart et al. 2000; Paul and Meyer 2001).
Since the applicant had previous permit authorization for the proposed impacts, we will not object
to the project provided the following conditions are incorporated into the permit to further reduce impacts
to fish and wildlife resources.
1. To minimize additional stream impacts, while retaining some measure of wildlife habitat, we
recommend that a 100-foot undisturbed, native, forested buffer along perennial streams, and a 50-
foot buffer along intermittent streams and wetlands. Maintaining undisturbed, forested buffers
along these areas will minimize impacts to fish and wildlife resources, water quality, and aquatic
habitat both within and downstream of the project area. In addition, wide riparian buffers are
helpful in maintaining stability of stream banks and for treatment of pollutants associated with
stormwater runoff. Whereas, a grassed buffer, particularly fescue, is a vegetated buffer but will
not provide the necessary and highly valuable functions as discussed for forested buffers.
2. We recommend that all remaining wetlands and streams on the site should be protected from
additional impacts by placing them in a permanent conservation easement to prohibit filling,
draining, flooding, and excavation.
3. Use bridges for all permanent roadway crossings of streams and associated wetlands to eliminate
the need to fill and culvert, where practicable. If culverts must be used, the culvert should be
designed to allow passage of aquatic organisms. Generally, this means that the culvert or pipe
invert is buried at least one foot below the natural streambed. If multiple cells are required, the
second and/or third cells should be placed so that their bottoms are at stream bankfull stage. This
will allow sufficient water depth in the culvert or pipe during normal flows to accommodate
movements of aquatic organisms. If culverts are long and sufficient slope exists, baffle systems
are recommended to trap gravel and provide resting areas for fish and other aquatic organisms. If
multiple pipes or cells are used, at least one pipe or box should be designed to remain dry during
normal flows to allow for wildlife passage. In addition, culverts or pipes should be situated so
that no channel realignment or widening is required Widening of the stream channel at the inlet
or outlet of structures usually causes a decrease in water velocity causing sediment deposition that
will require future maintenance. Finally, riprap should not be placed on the streambed.
4. To adequately protect streams, it is suggested that impervious surface is limited to less than 10%.
Suggested examples to accomplish the <10% impervious goal are using conventional designs at a
Page 3
15 June 2005
Governor's Village
Action ID No. 200520149
level of <10% imperviousness or using conservation clusters with higher densities, with dedicated
open space and other stormwater control measures to mimic the hydrograph consistent with an
impervious coverage of less than 100/9.
5. Locate sewers and other utilities as far away from creeks as functionally possible and minimize
stream crossings. It is preferable that sewers be located outside the riparian buffers. The
directional bore ('installation of utilities beneath the riverbed, avoiding impacts to the stream and
buffer) stream crossing method should be used for utility crossings wherever practicable, and the
open cut stream crossing method should only be used when water level is low and stream flow is
minimal. Manholes or similar access structures should not be allowed within buffer areas.
Stream crossings should be near perpendicular (75° to 105') to stream flow and should be
monitored at least every three months for maintenance needs during the first 24 months of the
project and then annually thereafter. Further, pesticides (including insecticides and herbicides)
should not be used for maintenance of rights-of-way within 100 feet of perennial streams and 50
feet of intermittent streams, or within floodplains and wetlands associated with these streams.
6. We recommend that landscaping consist of non-invasive native species and LID technology.
Using native species instead of ornamentals should provide benefits by reducing the need for
fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides. Additionally, native species should require less water.
Using LID technology in landscaping will not only help maintain the predevelopment hydrologic
regime, but also enhance the aesthetic and habitat value of the site.
7. Specialized efforts and techniques are implemented to reduce sediment runoff from construction
activities. Excessive silt and sediment loads can have numerous detrimental effects on aquatic
resources including destruction of spawning habitat, suffocation of eggs, and clogging of gills of
aquatic species.
8. It is our understanding that compensatory mitigation for wetlands is 2:1 for restoration, 3:1 for
creation, 4:1 for enhancement and 10.1 for preservation (in combination with appropriate
restoration, creation and enhancement). Therefore, we feel that compensatory mitigation for
impact to wetlands should be 2:1.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. If we can provide further assistance,
please contact our office at [phone].
Literature cited
Arnold, C. L., and C. L Gibbons. 1996. Impervious surface coverage--the emergence of a key
environmental indicator. Journal of the American Planning Association 62:243-258.
Doll, B. A., D. E. Wise-Frederick, C. M. Buckner, S. D. Wilkerson, W. A. Hannan, and R. E. Smith.
2000. Hydraulic geometry relationships for urban streams throughout the piedmont of North
Carolina. Pages 299-304 in P. J. Wigington, Jr. and R. L. Beschta, eds. Proceedings of the
American Water Resources Association International Conference on riparian ecology and
management in multi-land use watersheds, Portland, Oregon.
Mallin, M. A., K. E. Williams, E. C. Esham, and R. P. Lowe. 2000. Effect of human development on
bacteriological water quality in coastal watersheds. Ecological Applications 10(4):1047-1056.
Page 4
15 June 2005
Governor's Village
Action ID No. 200520149
May, C. W. and R. R. Horner. 2000. The cumulative impacts of watershed urbanization on stream-
riparian ecosystems. Pages 281-286 in P. J. Wigington, Jr. and R. L. Beschta, eds. Proceedings
of the American Water Resources Association International Conference on riparian ecology and
management in multi-land use watersheds, Portland, Oregon.
Paul, M. J., and J. L. Meyer. 2001. Streams in the urban landscape. Annual Review of Ecology and
Systematics 32:333-365.
Schueler, T. 1994. The importance of imperviousness. Watershed Protection Techniques. 1(3):100-
Stewart, J. S., D. M. Downes, L. Wang, J. A. Wierl, and R. Bannerman. 2000. Influences of riparian
corridors on aquatic biota in agricultural watersheds. Pages 209-214 in P. J. Wigington, Jr. and
R. L. Beschta, eds. Proceedings of the American Water Resources Association International
Conference on riparian ecology and management in multi-land use watersheds, Portland, Oregon.
cc: Cyndi Karoly, DWQ

roc„ ?aa??C?, ?
?iun ?„z me?i?

o?? F ??- ??0 w?+fd
?3
?f?f s ecQ D S
Axmujaj-L,-

C" 44
ov,
121 ?a 5-
9/a
fin/ ?-'
?4n ? , - ?-- *' M-oi-ome-is I -
az-?- (? 5-9" 7,5-5
vk?(L ?k-p ? f4015? &C-.

ll
Who,
cfy\
i
v 6N?
i
b35W5
_ ?Sc?l
O.S5 dy\"

V//
l ? 2?s
PO -170-7
and (/ l?lC ?Q ???? v`!/Gc (p.?ne?c? 6 dC - 7 y7C
r, ,C O
Pw- rn t -?h? M Ake.ll oJes ?en6 7o PA 9'3 c?,, -Y?6 .;
Wa r
? J?r..Vk - a e-e_ cores ( _ 3G?7-- 7
IlAiO De4
VP' : Governors Village
Subject: RE: Governors Village
From: "Bob Zarzecki" <bzarzecki @ sandec.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 14:05:02 -0500
To: "John Dorney" <[e-mail]>, "Cynthia F Van Der Wiele"
<cynthi a. vanderwiele @ ncmail .net>
CC: <[e-mail]>
,If we were applying for GC3402 or a similar general water quality
certification constructed wetlands, bio-retention areas or ponds
followed by forested filter strips would be required to meet the
stormwater condition of the general since the receiving waters were
classified as NSW back in 1983.
1F n1tvier ieK fc r-fS
rte. ?`2 7 +x. , ? L,
V-q,?,J d" `f 4,1 1 P
l c? ?yr ? ?-?'?.(Jac?s?
1- u 14 if-,5 Ct*ft,( dA
However given that this is an Individual Certification, I believe that
you have mor latitude of what you can accept, and the condition
approved i.n the current 401 allows for an alternate plan that provides
for comparable treatment. It should also be noted that this is for the
completion of an existing development previously approved by DWQ back in
1996 and that the applicant has avoided impacts that they were
previously approved to impact back in 1996.
i
They are proposing to upgrade a pond to provide better treatment for the
entire watershed rather than to install bioretention areas for just a
portion of the watershed. Conceptually this seems to be a better
approach. It's just a matter of how much verification of the improved
treatment you will require.
You can't assume that the existing pond is removing 25% TN unless it is
designed as per the current 1999 BMP manual. Since this pond was
designed in 1996 and constructed in 1997, it did not include many of the
required design parameters listed in the 1999 manual (e.g., forebays,
etc.). We can only assume that it would remove 25% TN if we upgrade it
to current design requirements.
I expect that the TN removal will be the primary topic of our meeting on
the 19th. The project engineer will try to provide as much information
as we can at this time to further our argument that this upgrade will
provide for similar or better TN removal than just providing
bio-retention areas for the single family and townhome sections of the
development.
See you on the 19th.
Bob Zarzecki,
Environmental Specialist
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
-----Original Message-----
From: John Dorney [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 1:08 PM
To: Cynthia F Van Der Wiele
Cc: Bob Zarzecki; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: Governors Village
yup. good catch. thankx
Cynthia F Van Der Wiele wrote:
Also, the water quality classification for that watershed would
dictate the use of a stormwater wetland or bioretention rather than a
pond in the first place.
John Dorney wrote:
OS-L? ?•
? ?+ ?? I Pss
1 of 3 12/19/2005 4:34 Pr I
1.:. Governors Village
my general concern is was this pond required to be constructed for
stormwater management. if it was, then your client is not treating
untreated stormwater. if it was constructed to treat stormwater and
you want to make it better treatment, then account only for the
increased efficiency in treatment rather than saying the stormwater
was untreated. does that make any sense? maybe the caffeine has not
quite kicked in.
Bob Zarzecki wrote:
Cynthia:
I'm working on the Governors Village project. The 2005
Certification was approved with a condition to provide stormwater
for the new single family and townhome sections of Governors
Village. The applicant has proposed to update an existing
stormwater pond constructed in 1997 to current DWQ 1999 BMP Manual
design requirements. The pond treats the entire Governors Village
development and some off site areas. We met with Danny regarding
this proposed alternative and he was agreement with the concept but
wanted to see the details. The engineer provided Danny with the
information that he requested. I understand that Danny has
discussed this with you and John Dorney and that you two have
concerns over the proposed plan. We now have a meeting scheduled
for December 19th at 3 pm to discuss your concerns. Could you
provide me with a specific list of your concerns? We would like to
see if we can address them before the meeting if at all possible.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
Bob Zarzecki
Environmental Specialist
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 11010 Raven Ridge Road Raleigh,
NC 27614
Phone: (919)
Phone: (919)
Fax: (919)
Mobile:(919)
www.SandEC.c
846-5900 ext. 317 (Main)
256-4517 (Direct)
846-9467
270-2068
om
This electronic communication, including all attachments, is
intended only for the named addressee (s) and may contain
confidential information. This electronic communication may not have
passed through our standard review/quality control process. Design
data and recommendations included herein are provided as a matter of
convenience and should not be used for final design. Rely only on
final, hardcopy materials bearing the consultant's original
signature and seal. If you are not the named addressee (s), any use,
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
prohibited. If you have received this electronic communication in
error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the
original communication from your system. Thank you.
2 of 3 12/19/2005 4:34 P1
2
hLAI- IuJ _ _
X33- ??
170 -7
iomjvrn w4ao?F_ 0- 6zzs t-? sdc. 7517n 9 o
CA. r ren r'1/? -?h?1? M ? dell t??s end??) PA . g3 02
;. o
5?c __
qk(o -,G-coo 31 -1
Aethr s aor
01 &O(A- VAO 71

Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
August 5, 2005
S&EC Project # 9325.w1
To: US Army Corps of Engineers N.C. Division of Water Quality
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Todd Tugwell Attn: Cyndi Karoly and Deborah Edwards
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615 Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
N.C. Division of Water Quality
Raleigh Regional Office
Attn: Eric Kulz
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
From: Bob Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Governors Village, Chapel Hill, NC - Individual Permit Application
Responses to USACE June 21, 2005 Letter (Action ID No. 200520149) &
DWQ July 12, 2005 Letter (Project No. 05-0810)
Dear Mr. Tugwell and Ms. Karoly,
On behalf of our client, Governors Club Limited Partnership, we are hereby providing
additional information in response to comments received during the Public Notice period, our
meeting on June 30, 2005 and as requested within the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
letter dated July 12, 2005 (received on July 14, 2005). This additional information is an
amendment to our existing Individual Permit application under review by both the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE; Action ID No. 200520149) and DWQ (Project No. 05-0810) for the
completion of the Governors Village development.
USACE June 21, 2005 Letter
in response to the June 21, 2005 letter from the USACE regarding comments received
during the Public Notice commenting period, we are providing the following supplemental
information and proposed modifications.
Letters were received from both the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) and N.C.
Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC). The comments within the letters were very similar
and included concerns over proper erosion and sediment control measures, minimization and
avoidance of wetland and stream impacts, protection of remaining wetlands and streams on the
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Governors Village Individual Permit Request/ S&EC Project No. 05-9325.w1
July 29, 2005
Page 2 of 5
property, limitations on impervious cover, and a few others. We believe that the proposed
development and construction practices in addition to other modifications to these proposed plans
as directed and conditioned by the USACE and DWQ will provide adequate measures to address
these concerns.
Mitigation -A primary concern from both the USFWS and NCWRC appears to be the
concern over adequate compensatory mitigation for impacts to wetlands and streams. The
applicant had originally proposed a 1:1 mitigation ratio for both wetlands and streams. In
consideration of these agency comments as well as discussions with the USACE, the applicant
proposes to modify their mitigation plan (by copy of this letter) to provide mitigation ratios of 1:1
for the 148 feet of permanent stream impacts associated with a road crossing, and 2:1 for the
0.365 acres of wetlands proposed to be impacted. We believe these ratios to be appropriate as
typically required to replace the quality and functions of streams and wetlands similar to those
proposed to be impacted by this development. Payment into the Wetlands Restoration Fund
administered by the N.C. Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) is proposed to satisfy this
mitigation. EEP has accepted our request to make this payment. The payment will be made
immediately following the approval of the 404 Permit and prior to any additional impacts
occurring at the site. In addition to the changes to the proposed mitigation plan, the applicant
proposes to avoid any additional, future impacts to wetlands and streams within the development.
In addition to the USFWS and NCWRC letters, a letter was received from Sue and John
Carpenter of 256 Old Farrington Road (adjacent neighbors to the development). The letter
addresses concerns over continued commercial and residential growth, impacts to water quality
and the drinking water supply, and the loss of wetlands and streams. Given that the proposed
impacts are less than those previously permitted, stormwater management is and will be provided
by the Village Pond, impervious surfaces have been reduced and open space will be preserved,
we believe that the concerns of Mr. and Mrs. Carpenter have been addressed. The County, other
responsible municipalities, and the DWQ will ensure that safe drinking water standards will be
maintained.
Finally, Mr. Tugwell informed us during our meeting on June 30, 2005 that the North
Carolina Department of Cultural Resources made a request after the closing of the comment
period for the Public Notice to provide photographs of all structures older than 50 years located
on the property. There is one structure located within the area of the 49-Lot Residential
Subdivision that is described in the Chatham County Property Records as constructed in 1900
making this structure 105 years old. Photos of this house are attached. It is not documented as a
historic resource by Cultural Resources (see their letter dated February 22, 2005 provided within
the original application). The house is currently vacant. Vinyl siding and windows were installed
on the house some time the past. We have contacted the Harris family and they cannot document
when the house was built, but did state that the house was never used as a Harris family home.
This house will be deconstructed or otherwise removed to allow for the construction of the new
49-lot subdivision.
DWO July 12, 2005 Letter
Road Crossing Impact # 2 - Concerns have been raised as to the location and alignment of the
road crossing to the existing townhomes north of Village Pond from the existing commercial area
and Village Park Drive Extension.
Governors Village Individual Permit Request / S&EC Project No. 05-9325.w1
July 29, 2005
Page 3 of 5
Alternative 1 (Existing Preferred Alternative) - The existing location aligns David Stone
Drive to Village Park Drive Extension at a standard perpendicular intersection. The
existing location impacted a section of the stream channel previously impacted during the
construction of the Village Pond and avoided impacts to the stream and wetlands to the
north that had not been impacted during the construction of the Village Pond. As such,
we believe this alternative is the most practical and the least damaging alternative to
water quality.
Alternative 2 (Relocating to South) - The possible relocation and realignment of David
Stone Drive to the south towards Village Pond was proposed as a solution to potentially
minimize impacts to the stream. This alternative would add additional impervious
surface within the vegetated riparian area around Village Pond and would allow for
potentially more pollutants carried via overland stormwater flows to the pond. This
alternative would also require significant grading due to the steep slopes west of the
pond. This alternative would not directly align to the intersection with Village Park
Drive Extension. Finally, this alternative would require the removal of mature hardwood
trees including five oak trees at least 20 inches in diameter (see attached photos). The
current plan for the townhomes west of the Village Pond and the existing location of the
road crossing (Impact #2) avoids these trees. As such, we do not believe this alternative
to be practical nor do we believe that this alternative will increase water quality benefits.
Alternative 3 (Relocating to North) - The possible relocation and alignment of this road
to the North would require additional permanent impacts to the remaining wetlands and
stream. Would not align with David Stone Drive south of the townhomes, but rather "T"
into the alley behind the townhomes. As such, we do not believe this alternative to be
practical nor do we believe that this alternative will increase water quality benefits.
Stormwater - Additional information regarding the anticipated impervious surface areas and
compliance with stormwater management plans and Water Supply regulations are provided.
76-Unit Townhomes - The proposed 76-Unit townhome development west of Village
Pond is anticipated to exceed 30% impervious surface or built upon area (BUA).
However, we do not believe that additional stormwater devices should be required
beyond the existing Village Pond because this development exists within the original
boundaries of the Governors Village development previously approved and was included
within the design of the Village Pond.
It should be noted that if the drained pond wetland area (Impact #4) is permitted for
impacts that there will be no additional waters located within the drainage area of this
townhome development other than the "Village Pond". And as such there are no streams
or other wetlands on the site that could be negatively impacted by stormwater runoff from
the development. We have provided additional photos of the drained pond wetland area
for your records.
Additional photos of the Village Pond are provided for your records. The pond is
functioning as designed. In addition, a fringe wetland has formed around the pond that
will provide additional nutrient uptake and wildlife habitat.
Governors Village Individual Permit Request / S&EC Project No. 05-9325.w1
July 29, 2005
Page 4 of 5
49-Lot Subdivision - The 49-lot residential subdivision has been recently added to the
development and was not part of the original Governors Village. As such we believe that
this new subdivision should comply with current DWQ stormwater management
practices if the subdivision exceeds 30% BUA as typically required by DWQ and as
required by many of the existing General Water Quality Certifications. The project
engineer has calculated the anticipated BUA (see attached) and initially determined that
this area would just barely exceed 30% BUA. As such the project manager has agreed to
reduce the BUA of the development. Modifications such as reducing the width of the
sidewalks to 4 feet and eliminating sidewalks in some areas where implemented to reduce
the BUA below 30%. The details of the project engineer's calculations as well as typical
lot footprints and a map of the project area are attached. The typical footprints include
both front and rear loading garage plans consistent with existing homes built in earlier
phases of Governors Park (an existing residential section of Governors Village). The
project engineer used conservative, higher anticipated footprint of 3,730 square feet for
all of the 49 lots, realizing that some lots will in fact be less impervious. The total BUA
is now anticipated to be 29.8% and should therefore not require additional stormwater
management devices beyond the existing Village Pond.
Water Supply Compliance - The development does and will continue to comply with the
locally implemented Water Supply Watershed ordinance as described in the letter from
Chatham County dated April 29, 2005 and provided within the original application. This
county ordinance was required under North Carolina Administrative Code 15A NCAC
02B .0104 and .0216 for Water Supply IV (WS-IV) waters. Please let us know ifyou
require any additional information. However, we understand that the County is
responsible for administering this program and as such we're not sure how much
information to provide you.
DWQ Approved Stormwater Management Plan - The 401 Water Quality Approval
issued on October 18, 1996 stated; "Additional written DWQ approval is required for
stormwater management for the commercial area." We have not been able to locate a
copy this plan or written approval from the DWQ. A copy of the approval should exist
within the DWQ file. However, we did not locate one while conducting a review of the
DWQ file. Given the typical stormwater management devices that were required in 1996
(nine years ago) by the DWQ, we believe that the stormwater management plan most
likely included the "Village Pond".
Treeline - Wetland Impact Map #3 depicts a representation of a treeline different from what
actually exists in the field. We apologize for this confusion. The actual treeline is located
approximately along the wetland stream boundary along Davis Stone Drive up to the proposed
road crossing to the 49-lot subdivision. The applicant is not proposing to clear this area other
than that immediately within the sanitary sewer easement. This easement will comply with all of
the standard conditions listed within the current GC3374 and NWP12 (even though the impacts
are requested to be approved under this Individual Permit and Certification) and should therefore
be considered a temporary impact. The proposed road crossing to the 49-lot subdivision was
shifted south towards the Village Pond prior to the initial permit request to move it into an
already primarily cleared area north of the Village Pond and to avoid impacts to the free-flowing
portions of the stream.
Governors Village Individual Permit Request / S&EC Project No. 05-9325.w1
July 29, 2005
Page 5 of 5
CONCLUSION
It is our understanding that this additional information will provide you all of the information
required for you to continue the review of our permit application. Please contact us if you require
any information beyond what has been provided in this response. We appreciate your review and
comments.
Sincerely,
Bob Zarzecki,
Environmental Specialist
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Attachments: Site Photos - August 2005
Impervious Surface / Built Upon Area (BUA) Calculations and Maps

House located on 49-Lot Subdivision Site - Front View from Farrington Road
House located on 49-Lot Subdivision Site - View of Northeast Side
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
SITE PHOTOS - AUGUST 2005

:t %, r I
:?, . - yam.; ??, t ., ? ?
t lt.? 'i
?
y v .
{eY ?h

? t',AI? l4h.Y ~?s' tY? Y ? .ty k ??lj Syj

House located on 49-Lot Subdivision Site - View of Southwest Side
t x ,
3
j
House located on 49-Lot Subdivision Site -
View of Southwest Porch, Vinyl Siding & Windows
11
a ?-'

GOVERNORS VILLAGE
SITE PHOTOS - AUGUST 2005
Road Impact # 2 - View from Dave Stone Drive in front of Existing Townhomes looking
West; Existing Road Curves to the North across the Stream to connect to Village Park
Drive Extension intersection and to avoid Large, Mature Hardwoods
Mature Hardwoods and 20"+ Oak Trees that would need to removed to relocate existing
road (Impact 42) to the South; View from existing Greenway Trail
Existing Road Crossing (Impact #2) and View of Back Alley (Left side of Townhomes)
Discussed as Possible Alternate Location of Road to the North.
Close Up View of Back Alley, Single-lane wide, not believed to be an acceptable
alternative location to realign Road (Impact #2)
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
SITE PHOTOS - AUGUST 2005
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
SITE PHOTOS - AUGUST 2005
Existing "Village Pond" - North End View from West Side
View of Fringe Wetlands Around the Village Pond '
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
SITE PHOTOS - AUGUST 2005
Drained Pond Wetland (Impact #4)
Drained Pond Wetland (Impact #4)

[\? ?-?-• _ 5 E5'4151• [ 569.69
'n-
o .
t ? ' O
W
10
? ® 1 O 1
1 ,
I
/ ,\ N
CA) 0
J,j
.? co
G)
o
(D y
CI) N
o o
~ r p ?• (n r Z
N C m o
C'n S M I
to o
CI) `D O
V_/
?• o
\ ? o
F
CD Z15
CD 0) W g
• Cl) Cc O
CD CD
?. U7 (!)
(D
S89 41'2WE•
1+ 1+
?. 1'y- -._. W O CJ? ---
?.
-Oc? CD
0;0 c
NON
-
-n co n 1 z.? -mz
a) 1+
00
/? J' O N / ,mot ?jz T f ,
.?1=-;may ?i:. ./' J'• ••st: y•-?._„' ?'
0 0
o
/? f 0? O n
ORIGINAL COPY

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road - Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
is August 5, 2005
S&EC Project # 9325.w1
To: US Army Corps of Engineers N.C. Division of Water Quality
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Todd Tugwell Attn: Cyndi Karoly and Deborah Edwards
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615 Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
N.C. Division of Water Quality
Raleigh Regional Office
Attn: Eric Kulz
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
From: Bob Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A. FILL
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Governors Village, Chapel Hill, NC - Individual Permit Application
Responses to USACE June 21, 2005 Letter (Action ID No. 200520149) &
DWQ July 12, 2005 Letter (Project No. 05-0810)
Dear Mr. Tugwell and Ms. Karoly,
On behalf of our client, Governors Club Limited Partnership, we are hereby providing
additional information in response to comments received during the Public Notice period, our
meeting on June 30, 2005 and as requested within the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
letter dated July 12, 2005 (received on July 14, 2005). This additional information is an
amendment to our existing Individual Permit application under review by both the U.S. ?R/7? D
Corps of Engineers (USACE; Action ID No. 200520149) and DWQ (Project No. 05-08 ??'.// D
completion of the Governors Village development.
AUG 8 2005
USACE June 21, 2005 Letter DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
In response to the June 21, 2005 letter from the USACE regarding comments received
during the Public Notice commenting period, we are providing the following supplemental
information and proposed modifications.
Letters were received from both the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) and N.C.
Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC). The comments within the letters were very similar
and included concerns over proper erosion and sediment control measures, minimization and
avoidance of wetland and stream impacts, protection of remaining wetlands and streams on the

Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip. Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Governors Village Individual Permit Request / S&EC Project No. 05-9325.w1
July 29, 2005
Page 2 of 5
property, limitations on impervious cover, and a few others. We believe that the proposed
development and construction practices in addition to other modifications to these proposed plans
as directed and conditioned by the USACE and DWQ will provide adequate measures to address
these concerns.
Mitigation - A primary concern from both the USFWS and NCWRC appears to be the
concern over adequate compensatory mitigation for impacts to wetlands and streams. The
applicant had originally proposed a 1:1 mitigation ratio for both wetlands and streams. In
consideration of these agency comments as well as discussions with the USACE, the applicant
proposes to modify their mitigation plan (by copy of this letter) to provide mitigation ratios of 1:1
for the 148 feet of permanent stream impacts associated with a road crossing, and 2:1 for the
0.365 acres of wetlands proposed to be impacted. We believe these ratios to be appropriate as
typically required to replace the quality and functions of streams and wetlands similar to those
proposed to be impacted by this development. Payment into the Wetlands Restoration Fund
administered by the N.C. Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) is proposed to satisfy this
mitigation. EEP has accepted our request to make this payment. The payment will be made
immediately following the approval of the 404 Permit and prior to any additional impacts
occurring at the site. In addition to the changes to the proposed mitigation plan, the applicant
proposes to avoid any additional, future impacts to wetlands and streams within the development.
In addition to the USFWS and NCWRC letters, a letter was received from Sue and John
Carpenter of 256 Old Farrington Road (adjacent neighbors to the development). The letter
addresses concerns over continued commercial and residential growth, impacts to water quality
and the drinking water supply, and the loss of wetlands and streams. Given that the proposed
impacts are less than those previously permitted, stormwater management is and will be provided
by the Village Pond, impervious surfaces have been reduced and open space will be preserved,
we believe that the concerns of Mr. and Mrs. Carpenter have been addressed. The County, other
responsible municipalities, and the DWQ will ensure that safe drinking water standards will be
maintained.
Finally, Mr. Tugwell informed us during our meeting on June 30, 2005 that the North
Carolina Department of Cultural Resources made a request after the closing of the comment
period for the Public Notice to provide photographs of all structures older than 50 years located
on the property. There is one structure located within the area of the 49-Lot Residential
Subdivision that is described in the Chatham County Property Records as constructed in 1900
making this structure 105 years old. Photos of this house are attached. It is not documented as a
historic resource by Cultural Resources (see their letter dated February 22, 2005 provided within
the original application). The house is currently vacant. Vinyl siding and windows were installed
on the house some time the past. We have contacted the Harris family and they cannot document
when the house was built, but did state that the house was never used as a Harris family home.
This house will be deconstructed or otherwise removed to allow for the construction of the new
49-lot subdivision.
DWQ July 12, 2005 Letter
Road Crossing Impact # 2 - Concerns have been raised as to the location and alignment of the
road crossing to the existing townhomes north of Village Pond from the existing commercial area
and Village Park Drive Extension.
Governors Village Individual Permit Request / S&EC Project No. 05-9325.w1
July 29, 2005
Page 3 of 5
Alternative I (Existing Preferred Alternative) - The existing location aligns David Stone
Drive to Village Park Drive Extension at a standard perpendicular intersection. The
existing location impacted a section of the stream channel previously impacted during the
construction of the Village Pond and avoided impacts to the stream and wetlands to the
north that had not been impacted during the construction of the Village Pond. As such,
we believe this alternative is the most practical and the least damaging alternative to
water quality.
Alternative 2 (Relocating to South) - The possible relocation and realignment of David
Stone Drive to the south towards Village Pond was proposed as a solution to potentially
minimize impacts to the stream. This alternative would add additional impervious
surface within the vegetated riparian area around Village Pond and would allow for
potentially more pollutants carried via overland stormwater flows to the pond. This
alternative would also require significant grading due to the steep slopes west of the
pond. This alternative would not directly align to the intersection with Village Park
Drive Extension. Finally, this alternative would require the removal of mature hardwood
trees including five oak trees at least 20 inches in diameter (see attached photos). The
current plan for the townhomes west of the Village Pond and the existing location of the
road crossing (Impact #2) avoids these trees. As such, we do not believe this alternative
to be practical nor do we believe that this alternative will increase water quality benefits.
Alternative 3 (Relocating to North) - The possible relocation and alignment of this road
to the North would require additional permanent impacts to the remaining wetlands and
stream. Would not align with David Stone Drive south of the townhomes, but rather "T"
into the alley behind the townhomes. As such, we do not believe this alternative to be
practical nor do we believe that this alternative will increase water quality benefits.
Stormwater - Additional information regarding the anticipated impervious surface areas and
compliance with stormwater management plans and Water Supply regulations are provided.
76-Unit Townhomes - The proposed 76-Unit townhome development west of Village
Pond is anticipated to exceed 30% impervious surface or built upon area (BUA).
However, we do not believe that additional stormwater devices should be required
beyond the existing Village Pond because this development exists within the original
boundaries of the Governors Village development previously approved and was included
within the design of the Village Pond.
It should be noted that if the drained pond wetland area (Impact #4) is permitted for
impacts that there will be no additional waters located within the drainage area of this
townhome development other than the "Village Pond And as such there are no streams
or other wetlands on the site that could be negatively impacted by stormwater runoff from
the development. We have provided additional photos of the drained pond wetland area
for your records.
Additional photos of the Village Pond are provided for your records. The pond is
functioning as designed. In addition, a fringe wetland has formed around the pond that
will provide additional nutrient uptake and wildlife habitat.
Governors Village Individual Permit Request / S&EC Project No. 05-9325.w1
July 29, 2005
Page 4 of 5
49-Lot Subdivision - The 49-lot residential subdivision has been recently added to the
development and was not part of the original Governors Village. As such we believe that
this new subdivision should comply with current DWQ stormwater management
practices if the subdivision exceeds 30% BUA as typically required by DWQ and as
required by many of the existing General Water Quality Certifications. The project
engineer has calculated the anticipated BUA (see attached) and initially determined that
this area would just barely exceed 30% BUA. As such the project manager has agreed to
reduce the BUA of the development. Modifications such as reducing the width of the
sidewalks to 4 feet and eliminating sidewalks in some areas where implemented to reduce
the BUA below 30%. The details of the project engineer's calculations as well as typical
lot footprints and a map of the project area are attached. The typical footprints include
both front and rear loading garage plans consistent with existing homes built in earlier
phases of Governors Park (an existing residential section of Governors Village). The
project engineer used conservative, higher anticipated footprint of 3,730 square feet for
all of the 49 lots, realizing that some lots will in fact be less impervious. The total BUA
is now anticipated to be 29.8% and should therefore not require additional stonmwater
management devices beyond the existing Village Pond.
Water Supply Compliance - The development does and will continue to comply with the
locally implemented Water Supply Watershed ordinance as described in the letter from
Chatham County dated April 29, 2005 and provided within the original application. This
county ordinance was required under North Carolina Administrative Code 15A NCAC
02B .0104 and .0216 for Water Supply IV (WS-IV) waters. Please let us know if you
require any additional information. However, we understand that the County is
responsible for administering this program and as such we're not sure how much
information to provide you.
DWQ Approved Stormwater Management Plan - The 401 Water Quality Approval
issued on October 18, 1996 stated; "Additional written DWQ approval is required for
stormwater management for the commercial area." We have not been able to locate a
copy this plan or written approval from the DWQ. A copy of the approval should exist
within the DWQ file. However, we did not locate one while conducting a review of the
DWQ file. Given the typical stormwater management devices that were required in 1996
(nine years ago) by the DWQ, we believe that the stormwater management plan most
likely included the "Village Pond".
Treeline - Wetland Impact Map #3 depicts a representation of a treeline different from what
actually exists in the field. We apologize for this confusion. The actual treeline is located
approximately along the wetland stream boundary along Davis, Stone Drive up to the proposed
road crossing to the 49-lot subdivision. The applicant is not proposing to clear this area other
than that immediately within the sanitary sewer easement. This easement will comply with all of
the standard conditions listed within the current GC3374 and NWP12 (even though the impacts
are requested to be approved under this Individual Permit and Certification) and should therefore
be considered a temporary impact. The proposed road crossing to the 49-lot subdivision was
shifted south towards the Village Pond prior to the initial permit request to move it into an
already primarily cleared area north of the Village Pond and to avoid impacts to the free-flowing
portions of the stream.
Governors Village Individual Permit Request / S&EC Project No. 05-9325.w1
July 29, 2005
Page 5 of 5
CONCLUSION
It is our understanding that this additional information will provide you all of the information
required for you to continue the review of our permit application. Please contact us if you require
any information beyond what has been provided in this response. We appreciate your review and
comments.
Sincerely,
Bob Zarzecki,
Environmental Specialist
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Attachments: Site Photos - August 2005
Impervious Surface / Built Upon Area (BUA) Calculations and Maps
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
SITE PHOTOS - AUGUST 2005
House located on 49-Lot Subdivision Site - Front View from Farrington Road
House located on 49-Lot Subdivision Site - View of Northeast Side
F
t. F? ? C fd? ?. 11 x15 '?h
i
r

House located on 49-Lot Subdivision Site - View of Southwest Side
House located on 49-Lot Subdivision Site -
View of Southwest Porch, Vinyl Siding & Windows

Road Impact # 2 - View from Dave Stone Drive in front of Existing Townhomes looking
West; Existing Road Curves to the North across the Stream to connect to Village Park
Drive Extension intersection and to avoid Large, Mature Hardwoods
Mature Hardwoods and 20"+ Oak Trees that would need to removed to relocate existing
road (Impact #2) to the South; View from existing Greenway Trail
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
SITE PHOTOS - AUGUST 2005
_w
Existing Road Crossing (Impact #2) and View of Back Alley (Left side of Townhomes)
Discussed as Possible Alternate Location of Road to the North.
Close Up View of Back Alley, Single-lane wide, not believed to be an acceptable
alternative location to realign Road (Impact #2)
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
SITE PHOTOS - AUGUST 2005
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
SITE PHOTOS - AUGUST 2005
Existing "Village Pond" - North End View from West Side
View of Fringe Wetlands Around the Village Pond
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
SITE PHOTOS - AUGUST 2005
Drained Pond Wetland (Impact 94)
Drained Pond Wetland (Impact #4)
f(

L
o
Z
1
10
i • \-
I, O ? O
a 1
I I $ ? -. 1 p
ell.
O ?
iL ,O -O
1 _
1+ -o
wo
C-
.4. n
n--1
O
z
D
X
G)

c -n CD
3 a
N

?
?
c O
`C N o o
m o
Q y
O j
CO
?-"\
?V CD Q
'

S8 '41'29"E-
` +1N
1+ 1+ I+
0;0 c
o Abp .?- •-- -- -? ?,,,. -? p ? \
--n -Nn -Nn
/w?.-?? -•? ter' :.:: ?' ;;
0;u c ?-
?, 001+ \ ? ? ??';• ,-•- ? w ? .?'
N(I
?}\\?\ vii •'? ,,.? ?/f'; £,.
'? r •'''• •ti
-n cD
4
-g
a) 3
i p o 0N ?_
-?` z
CD CD
c vl C/)
c
r
A J W A TF9
QG
> r
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 12, 2005
DWQ Project # 05-0810
Chatham County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Governors Club Limited Partnership
Attn: Dan Vincent
PO Box 3923
Sanford, NC 27331
Subject Property: Governors Village
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Vincent:
On May 9, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated May 6, 2005 to
impact 0.365 acres of wetlands and 202 feet of streams to constrict the proposed residential subdivision.
On May 20, 2005 the DWQ received the Public Notice issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers. The
DWQ has determined that your application was incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as
discussed below. The DWQ will require additional information in order to process your application to
impact protected wetlands and/or streams on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive the
additional information requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as
required by 15A NCAC 2H.0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this
additional information. Please provide the following information so that we may continue to review your
project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Road Crossing Impact #2
Please explain the possibilities of minimizing the linear foot of stream impacts at Impact #2,
including relocation of the road, building a headwall, etc. If this cannot be achieved, please
provide the appropriate justification.
2. Stormwater
A) Please provide the impervious breakdown for the new proposed 76-units townhomes and the
new 49 residential lots including but not limited to roads, sidewalks, footprints of structures,
porches etc. In addition, please explain how the development is and will be in full compliance
with current Water Supply Watershed regulations.
B) Please provide the DWQ approved stormwater management plan that was required in the
October 18, 1996 401 Water Quality Approval for the commercial areas within your project.
'Express Review Permits Unit '
ice Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
3.1786 / FAX [phone] / Internet: q2.//h2o.enr.state nc us/ncwetlands
N"oi?` Carolina
"Na MM4
tunity/Affirmative Action Employer -50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

f
Governors Club Limited Partnership
Page 2 of 2
7/12/05
3. Additional wetland impacts around 3C and 3D
The plans indicate a treeline much different than what now exists in the field. Explain if and how
these trees are to be removed from the wetland.
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me in writing,
Eric Kulz of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office and Shelton Sullivan of the DWQ NPS Assistance and
compliance Oversight Unit, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617. If we do not hear from
you within three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will
consider the project as withdrawn.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters
or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not
authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly at 919-733-1786 if you have any
questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
Cyn i \.Karoly, Supervisor
401 ON?rsight/Express Review Permits Unit
CBKldae
cc: Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
Todd Tugwell-USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Shelton Sullivan-DWQ NPS Assistance and Compliance Oversight Unit, 1617 MSC, Raleigh,
NC 27699-1617
Filename: 050810GovernorsVillage(Chatham)hold

6m;
?o?OF W TF?QG Michael F. Easley, Go or 1 Ai9?;
William G. Ross Jr., Secre Vl I1
7- North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Rt=es
O Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
October 3, 2005
Governors Club Limited Partnership
Attn: Dan Vincent
PO Box 3923
Sanford, NC 27331
Re: Governors Village, Chapel Hill, NC, Chatham County
DOA Action ID 200520149, DWQ Project No. 20050810
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Vincent:
Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No. 3539 issued to Mr. Dan Vincent of Governors Club Limited
Partnership, dated September 30, 2005. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local
permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Solid Waste, Sediment and
Erosion Control, Stormwater, Dam Safety, Non-discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us.
AWK/dae
Attachments: Certificate of Completion
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
cc: Todd Tugwell, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Wilmington District, USACOE
Eric Kulz, DWQ, Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Bob Zarzecki-S&EC, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
Shelton Sullivan, DWQ, NPS Assistance & Compliance Oversight Unit
Filename: 050810GovernorsClub(Chatham) 401
401 Oversight/Express Review Permits Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] / Internet htto://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwe0ands
rAn Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Dan Vincent, Governors Club Limited Partnership
1 Page 2 of 5
October 3, 2005
NORTH CAROLINA 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401 Public Laws 92-
500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
Regulations in 15 NCAC 211, Section.0500 to Mr. Dan Vincent of Governors Club Limited Partnership to
permanently fill 0.365 acres of wetlands and 202 linear feet of stream channel (including 168 linear feet of
perennial streams, of which 20 linear feet are temporary and 34 linear feet of temporary intermittent
streams) and 0.041 acres of open water impacts associated with the construction of the Governors Village
development in Chatham County, North Carolina, pursuant to an application filed on the 6th day of May of
2005, and in additional correspondence received August 8, 2005.
The application and supporting documentation provides adequate assurance that the proposed work will
not result in a violation of applicable Water Quality Standards and discharge guidelines. Therefore, the
State of North Carolina certifies that this activity will not violate the applicable portions of Sections 301,
302, 303, 306, 307 of PL 92-500 and PL 95-217 if conducted in accordance with the application, the
supporting documentation, and conditions hereinafter set forth.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design submitted in the application materials and as
described in the Public Notice. If the project is changed, prior to notification a new application for a new
Certification is required. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification
and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions of this Certification. Any
new owner must notify the Division and request the Certification be issued in their name. Should wetland
or stream fill be requested in the future, additional compensatory mitigation may be required as described
in 15A NCAC 211.0506 (h) (6) and (7). If any plan revisions from the approved site plan result in a
change in stream or wetland impact or an increase in impervious surfaces, the DWQ shall be notified in
writing and a new application for 401 Certification may be required. For this approval to be valid,
compliance with the conditions listed below is required.
Conditions of Certification:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:
Amount Approved nits Plan Location or Reference
Stream 148 (feet) permanent Final project impacts as listed in
perennial impacts May 6, 2005 Individual Permit
(Also 20 feet perennial Application from Soil &
and 34 feet of intermittent Environmental Consultants, PA
temporary stream im acts
404 Wetlands 0.331 (acres) permanent Final project impacts as listed in
impacts May 6, 2005 Individual Permit
(Also 0.034 acres Application from Soil &
temporary impacts) Environmental Consultants, PA
Open Waters 0.041 (acres) of permanent Final project impacts as listed in
impacts May 6, 2005 Individual Permit
Application from Soil &
Environmental Consultants, PA
Mr. Dan Vincent, Governors Club Limited Partnership
Page 3 of 5
October 3, 2005
Sediment and Erosion Control:
2. Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in
accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
e. Sufficient materials required for stabilization and/or repair of erosion control measures and
stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times.
3. No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond
the footprint of the impacts depicted in the 404/401Permit Application. All construction activities,
including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best
Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards,
statutes, or rules occur,
4. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum
extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is
unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that
the Division of Land Resources has released the project;
Continuing Compliance:
5. Mr. Dan Vincent and/or Governors Club Limited Partnership shall conduct construction activities
in a manner consistent with State water quality standards (including any requirements resulting
from compliance with section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act) and any other appropriate
requirements of State law and federal law. If the Division determines that such standards or laws
are not being met (including the failure to sustain a designated or achieved use) or that State or
federal law is being violated, or that further conditions are necessary to assure compliance, the
Division may reevaluate and modify this Certification to include conditions appropriate to assure
compliance with such standards and requirements in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0507(d).
Before modifying the Certification, the Division shall notify Mr. Dan Vincent and/or Governors
Club Limited Partnership and the US Army Corps of Engineers, provide public notice in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0503 and provide opportunity for public hearing in accordance
with 15A NCAC 2H.0504. Any new or revised conditions shall be provided to Mr. Dan Vincent
and/or Governors Club Limited Partnership in writing, shall be provided to the United States
Army Corps of Engineers for reference in any Permit issued pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act, and shall also become conditions of the 404 Permit for the project;
Mr. Dan Vincent, Governors Club Limited Partnership
Page 4 of 5
October 3, 2005
Road Crossings:
6. Culvert Installation
Culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream profiles
are not altered. Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section dimensions, pattern, and
longitudinal profile) must be maintained above and below locations of each culvert. Culverts shall
be designed and installed to allow for aquatic life movement as well as to prevent head cutting of the
streams. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched, the appropriate stream grade shall be re-
established or, if the pipes installed in a perched manner, the pipes shall be removed and re-installed
correctly.
The establishment of native, woody vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques
must be used where practicable instead of riprap or other bank hardening methods. If riprap is
necessary, it shall not be placed in the streambed, unless specifically approved by the Division of
Water Quality.
Installation of culverts in wetlands must ensure continuity of water movement and be designed to
adequately accommodate high water or flood conditions.
Stormwater Management:
7. Since the project is located in a WS-IV, Nutrient Sensitive Waters, it will be required that within
60 days of the issuance of this Certification, a final, written stormwater management plan
(including a signed and notarized Operation and Maintenance Agreement) for the 76-Unit
Townhomes (proposed developed area west of Village Pond) and the 49-Lot residential
subdivision (proposed developed area east of the Village Pond) shall be approved in writing by the
Division of Water Quality's Wetlands Unit. The facilities must be designed to remove 85% TSS,
as well as treat nitrogen in the runoff from each area by using extended detention wetlands, bio-
retention areas, and/or ponds followed by forested filter strips (designed according to latest version
of the NC DENR Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual). Also, before any permanent
building or other structure is occupied in each area, the facilities (as approved by the Wetlands
Unit) for that area shall be constructed and operational, and the stormwater management plans for
these areas (as approved by the Wetlands Unit) shall be implemented. The structural stormwater
practices as approved by the Wetlands Unit as well as drainage patterns must be maintained in
perpetuity. No changes to the structural stormwater practices shall be made without written
authorization from the Division of Water Quality. However, in an effort to be accommodating to
what may be unique site specific constraints DWQ will accept an equivalent amount of presently
untreated onsite stormwater to offset the new impervious surface that is being proposed to occur
with these project areas (Our hope is that this would be easier site specific constraints).
Other conditions:
8. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of the project, the Applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" form to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the §401 Certification has been
completed. The responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the 40I/Wetlands
Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality upon completion of the project. Please send photographs
upstream and downstream of each culvert site to document correct installation along with the
Certificate of Completion form.
Mr. Dan Vincent, Governors Club Limited Partnership
Page 5 of 5
October 3, 2005
9. Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within these
boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange warning fencing
(or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved to infringe within the
buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure compliance.
10. Construction Stormwater Permit NCG010000
Upon the approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan issued by the Division of Land
Resources (DLR) or a DLR delegated local erosion and sedimentation control program, an NPDES
General stormwater permit (NCG010000) administered by DWQ is automatically issued to the
project. This General Permit allows stormwater to be discharged during land disturbing
construction activities as stipulated by conditions in the permit. If your project is covered by this
permit (applicable to construction projects that disturb one (1) or more acres], full compliance with
permit conditions including the sedimentation control plan, self-monitoring, record keeping and
reporting requirements are required. A copy of this permit and monitoring report forms may be
found at httt -11h2o.enr.state.nc.us1su1Forms Documents.htm.
11. Deed Notifications
Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands,
waters and protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer
impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or
buffers approved for impact under this Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate. A
sample deed notification can be downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at
http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/newetlands. The text of the sample deed notification may be modified as
appropriate to suit to this project.
Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as
depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 Permit.
If this Certification is unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written
request within sixty (60) days following receipt of this Certification. This request must be in the form of a
written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes and filed with the
Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. If
modifications are made to an original Certification, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing on the
modifications upon written request within sixty (60) days following receipt of the Certification. Unless
such demands are made, this Certification shall be final and binding.
This the 3rd day of October 2005
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AWK/dae
AGovemors Village
l.'
I
Subject: Governors Village
From: "Levitas, Steve" <[e-mail]>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 10:36:13 -0400
To: <[e-mail]>
CC: "Mark Ashness \(E-mail\)" <[e-mail]>, "Dane Vincent \(E-mail\)"
<[e-mail]>, "Bob Zarzecki \(E-mail\)" <[e-mail]>, "Edmund Waddill"
<[e-mail]>, "Joe Faulkner \(E-mail\)" <[e-mail]>
Danny -- As requested, I am attaching a copy of the 401 for Governors Village. The problematic condition is
Condition 7, which requires that a stormwater management plan be submitted for approval by DWQ and
implemented which achieves 85% TSS removal and nitrogen treatment for two parcels being newly developed
and that extended detention wetlands, bioretention areas, or ponds followed by filter strips be utilized.
However, the last sentence of Condition 7 recognized that site constraints might (in fact, do) make it
impossible to achieve these stormwater requirements without significantly altering the site plans and
restructuring the transaction. Condition 7 therefore allows the developer, in lieu of the requirements just
stated, to achieve comparable treatment to stormwater from other parts of the development. We would like to
submit a stormwater plan that demonstrates that the existing stormwater pond serving the entire development
can, with relatively minor modifications (raising the outlet and adding a littoral shelf), meet 85% TSS removal,
for the entire project, not just the newly developed parcels. I think we can further demonstrate significant
nitrogen treatment for entire development, though some modifications (e.g., addition of a forebay) might be
needed if we have to provide additional nitrogen treatment. We would like to meet with you on site to show
you our conceptual plan for stormwater management. We will then submit a formal plan with detailed
engineering drawings. Since this type of submittal is envisioned and allowed by the existing 401, I don't think
any modification to the 401 is required. Please let me know some times next week that work for you. We
would like to get this done ASAP as we are on a tight construction schedule. Thanks for your help. Steve
El
Steven J. Levitas
Kilpatrick Stockton LLP
Suite 400
3737 Glenwood Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27612
t 919 420 1707
f 919 510 6145
Confidentiality Notice:
This communication constitutes an electronic communication within the meaning of the Electronic
Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 2510, and its disclosure is strictly limited to the recipient
intended by the sender of this message. This transmission, and any attachments, may contain confidential
attorney-client privileged information and attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, any
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission
is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Please contact us immediately by return e-mail or at 919 420 1700, and destroy
the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any matter.
***DISCLAIMER*** Treasury Department Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements
imposed by the Treasury Department, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this
communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the
1 of 2 10/24/2005 9:21 AM
imap:Hdebbie. edwards%40dwq. denr. [e-mail]:143/...
Subject: Governors Village
From: "Bob Zarzecki" <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 15:04:05 -0400
To: <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>,
<Todd. [e-mail]. army.mil>
Todd, Debbie & Eric:
I hope that you believe me when I say that I don't mean to be the
"squeaky wheel". However, project personnel have a weekly Wednesday
meeting on Governors Village. Since our last submittal on August 5th,
I've been reporting in that the agencies are still reviewing the latest
information. I've been in your shoes and realize that it has only been
a month, but every week they get more anxious. My fear is that they
will eventually start thinking that it's a matter of my persistence and
abilities in getting a response out of the agencies and not simply a
matter of your work loads. If this happens then I expect that they will
start looking to bring in assistance from other sources. None of us
want that, so if there is anything that I can do to help in your review
please let me know. I will be glad to meet with you if you think it
would be helpful.
Bob
1 of 1 9/14/2005 3:38 PM
GOVERNOR'S VILLAGE
June 30, 2005 Meeting
2 pm to 4 pm
AGENDA
Attendees:
C-CX-VWY"-QV-L
Bob Zarzecki S&EC, PA
Edmund Waddell Crosland, Inc.
Todd Tugwell USACE - Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Deborah Edwards DWQ - 401 Oversight & Express Permits Unit
Eric Kulz DWQ - Raleigh Regional Office
Item One: 404 Permit - Todd Tugwell
Public Notice; USFWS, NCWRC
& Pubic Comments
Other 404 Permit Issues
Item Two: 401 Certification - Debbie Edwards & Eric Kulz
401 Certification Issues
Closing Comments & Discussion
P lJ BLTC N A ICEMAY 2 0 2005 r'
US Army Corps f:l i!
Of Engineers
Wilmington District
Issue Date: May 19, 2005
Comment Deadline: June 17, 2005
Corps Action ID #: 200520149
All interested parties are herby advised that the Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
(Corps) has received an application for work within jurisdictional waters of the United
States. Specific plans and location information are described below and shown on the
attached plans. This Public Notice and all attached plans are also available on the
Wilmington District Web Site at www.saw.usace.army.mil/wetlands
Applicant: Governors Club Limited Partnership
Attn: Mr. Dan Vincent
Post Office Box 3923
Sanford, NC 27331
AGENT (if applicable):
Authority
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Attn: Mr. Bob Zarzecki
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
The Corps will evaluate this application and a decide whether to issue, conditionally
issue, or deny the proposed work pursuant to the applicable procedures of Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act.
Location
The project is located in Governors Village Subdivision, east of Mt. Carmel Church
Road, north of Old Farrington Road, southeast of Chapel Hill, Chatham County, North
Carolina. The site contains wetlands and unnamed tributaries to Cub Creek, in the Cape
Fear River Basin (8-Digit Cataloging Unit 03030002). Coordinates (in decimal degrees)
for the site are 35.8509 'N, 79.0246 ° W.
Existing Site Conditions
The subdivision, which is located in a suburban area south of Durham, has been under
development for several years. Currently, northern and western portions of the property
contain single and multi-family residential units or commercial space. The southern
portion of the project contains several forested tracts and a large stormwater pond
originally constructed to treat storrwater runoff from the entire site. Two stream
channels flow into the upper (northern) end of the pond from existing portions of the
development. Both stream channels receive considerable runoff from completed portions
of the development. A small drained pond, which now contains an herbaceous wetland,
is also located in a forested area to the west of the stormwater pond.
Applicant's Stated Purpose
As stated by the applicant, the purpose of the project is to complete construction of
Governors Village, and to provide retail, office, and other commercial services and
housing for residents within the surrounding community.
Project Description
The permit request for this project is an after-the-fact application. Some of the impacts
associated with this permit application have already been completed. This public notice
does not imply, on the part of the Corps of Engineers or other agencies, either a favorable
or an unfavorable opinion of the work performed. This notice is issued to solicit
comments regarding the factors on which a final decision will be based. The applicant
has agreed to place the project on hold, pending the resolution of the permit application.
Further enforcement action, including possible legal action, has been suspended pending
the outcome of this consideration.
The project is a mixed-use development that includes residential and commercial areas.
Development of the site began in the mid-1990's and has progressed from the northern
portion of the site to the south. During the initial stages of the project, the Corps
provided permit authorization for all existing and proposed impacts, however the
authorization expired before all impacts could be completed. One of the road crossings,
shown on Impact Map 2 in the attached plans, was constructed after the permit
authorization expired. The applicant is applying for reauthorization for this unauthorized
road crossing and for all remaining unfinished impacts.
As stated by the applicant, there are several remaining impacts to waters of the U.S.
needed for completion of the project. Additional construction is planned to expand the
existing commercial portion of the site to allow two additional buildings and parking
areas. The work, as depicted on Impact Map 1, will require the placement of concrete
culverts, fill material, and riprap into 0.118 acre of wetlands. The applicant also proposes
to extend utility services across the stream system downstream of the commercial site.
These impacts, shown on Impact Map 2, will temporarily disturb of 0.012 acre of
wetlands and 20 linear feet of perennial stream channel. Map 2 also shows the road
crossing that was constructed to provide access between residential and commercial
portions of the site. This road was constructed without permit authorization and has
resulted in the placement of culverts and fill into 148 linear feet of perennial stream
channel. A second road crossing is planned to provide access between the existing
residential areas and an undeveloped tract that will contain 49 single-family residential
lots. This road crossing, as shown on Impact Map 3, will require the placement of
2
culverts and fill into 0.041 acre of open water which was formed by the back water of the
storm pond extending up one of the tributaries. Map 3 also depicts the temporary
disturbance of 0.022 acre of wetland and 34 linear feet of intermittent stream channel for
the construction of utility lines required to service the new single-family residential area.
The final impact will result from the placement of 0.213 acre of fill material into
herbaceous wetlands located in the bed of the drained pond. These impacts, which are
depicted on Impact Map 4, are necessary for the construction a new 76-unit town home
cluster. Heavy equipment, including graders, pan scrapers, excavators, bull dozers, etc.
will be used for the construction of the project.
Impacts to wetlands associated with all proposed activities totals 0.365 acre,
including 0.034 acre of temporary disturbance. Impacts to stream channels associated
with all proposed activities totals 202 linear feet, including 54 linear feet of temporary
disturbance. The total loss of all waters of the U.S. is 0.425 acre. The applicant proposes
mitigation for impacts to stream channels and wetlands associated with the project at a
1:1 ratio by providing payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
for the restoration of 148 linear feet of stream channel, 0.365 acre of riparian wetlands.
No mitigation for impacts to open waters has been proposed.
Other Required Authorizations
This notice and all applicable application materials are being forwarded to the appropriate
State agencies for review. The Corps will generally not make a final permit decision
until the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) issues, denies, or waives
State certification required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (PL 92-500). The
receipt of the application and this public notice in the NCDWQ Central Office in Raleigh
serves as application to the NCDWQ for certification. A waiver will be deemed to occur
if the NCDWQ fails to act on this request for certification within sixty days of the date of
the receipt of this notice in the NCDWQ Central Office. Additional information
regarding the Clean Water Act certification maybe reviewed at the NCDWQ Central
Office, 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit, 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Raleigh,
North Carolina 27604-2260. All persons desiring to make comments regarding the
application for certification under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act should do so in
writing delivered to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ), 1650 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 Attention: Ms Cyndi Karoly by
June 10, 2005.
Essential Fish Habitat
This notice initiates the Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) consultation requirements of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. The Corps' initial
determination is that the proposed project will not adversely impact EFH or associated
fisheries managed by the South Atlantic or Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Councils
or the National Marine Fisheries Service.
Cultural Resources
The Corps has consulted the latest published version of the National Register of Historic
Places and is not aware that any registered properties, or properties listed as being
eligible for inclusion therein are located within the project area or will be affected by the
proposed work. Presently, unknown archeological, scientific, prehistoric, or historical
data may be located within the project area and/or could be affected by the proposed
work.
Endangered Species
The Corps has reviewed the project area, examined all information provided by the
applicant and consulted the latest North Carolina Natural Heritage Database. Based on
available information, the Corps has determined pursuant to the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, that the proposed project will have no effect on federally listed endangered or
threatened species or their formally designated critical habitat.
Evaluation
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable
impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity on the public interest.
That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of
important resources. The benefit which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the
proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors
which may be relevant to the proposal will be considered including the cumulative effects
thereof; among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental
concerns, wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, flood plain
values (in accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use, navigation, shoreline
erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy
needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property
.ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving
the discharge of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, the evaluation of
the impact of the activity on the public interest will include application of the
Environmental Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) guidelines.
Commenting Information
The Corps is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local agencies and
officials, including any consolidate State Viewpoint or written position of the Governor;
Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of
this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps tot.
determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To
make this decision, comments. are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic
properties, water quality, general environmental effects and the other public interest
factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental
4
Assessment (EA) and/or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Comments are also used to determine the
need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed
activity.
Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice,
that a public hearing be held to consider the application. Requests for public hearings
shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. Requests for a
public hearing shall be granted, unless the District Engineer determines that the issues
raised are insubstantial or there is otherwise no valid interest to be served by a hearing.
Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will be received
by the Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, until 5pm, June 17, 2005. Comments
should be submitted to Todd Tugwell, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office, 6508 Falls of the
Neuse Road, Suite 120, Raleigh, NC 27615.
5

G / Pr p ( Hll. j - P ov ie i
t _ ?p FZ
cy..s 1 I u \ t
- ? '21v ?r'?"?x i ?? i ,r xi j •r pfd ? y ?-7 -_ f r,}.r
' 1/ r ?CrOV ,z ? _ f rye} T\?y?. H f
-Fv
Meb r F` r ELI .yr ,4f1/{ - -
f #y ; / ?? y.
--?€i ??-?:? ? ? a .? o?eecbee4. ? y ? r' s. ?' t ?-?,?..+f rr+v` -, F ±} ?
I ' I -. ? a _ - MoUntm`n ? y fl +c r r . ; ?s'r` "` t ? <4 50 ?
s ?- T
'? ? I' ,_ D c am ? T acre- a
of-
?
P1 tlj tct Location
J) { Ra el h
t ? t
Cro win
3£etit?d`?i}i?R
:? 1 f = S IF i,[ t rn '` ' h {?[` Poplgr_y?EP nC-tnt _ r
_ ? ? F.. esr ao ? MR l4. ??? a _. ? ?"_ y\ r r I r>•F i
-? Sb A r e r ?? a
s? x
P ? i tt/, ? `. Fr ! 1 (?'. :.?? '-j44 ,TC jy , >i _ r? tF ?????{ { -1 `.• ? ? { ? -
l _ ? Mope e o i?'
S 4
Anna
ut
t
A. A
PROJECT LOCATION ",j) ID # 200320149 Chatham County, North Carolina
Governors Club Limited Partnership May 19, 2003
o a
Post Office Box 3923 Sheet 1 of l
Sanford, NC 27331
Scete 1 :400,000 m 2001 DeLorme. It'Iap Yrint Pick
n natl. ?,. N ,a e?°?.•
N
Projects Scale:
9325.w1 NTS
Mgr.: BZ 5-2.05
Farrington, NC
USGS Quad
Governor's Village
Chatham County, NC
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
AID # 200520149 Chatbam County, North Carolina
Governors Club Limited Partnership May 19, 2005
Post Office Box 3923 Sheet 2 of 7
Sanford, NC 27331
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: wvvw.SandEC.com
.y w <
R 0 ? ?
LR 0 0
Z A u N '
n,?ng
N o F ,.,, ro
?W?bZ
ro ?
m
x
A
,
u
cr
to
b A?
N
o f7
00
?^ e
0
z
0
,
s
m
0

?OYEkNop

n Le
Z
n
e1 ZO

- znr
y° D n c ; 0 1 I
.AMZ6

z 1 ,
I•x ? O O
J C,
C o
w?
a
m
d
m
N
b
••t Ir ?
A•bm
vo°A
N ?
C
O
z
m
0

O
N
D
f1 O
11
Qi
O
7
= O Z0
C
iT
U
O
V
A TO
=i?m
3Dm z
...
0
0 0lf
n
I3nr
1D. 0
z m
O
..i
u L-- 1
E'D 5:
D
N O 1 - _ • _ _ l r•--'-? 1
A O ii i __ _ 'r- --t •_
,t _J L - 1
1 c4? 1
00
I
,i i. I I 1
?0 I _J
is Z - + I I
•;Y ? f--• __ I I I I
1 !
I it i .1 .+•t _ 11 ,n' / /' '' _.
1 ., .i it O
in / f I YJ
01
Inxr.f IJ 'ktjf?_J r
1 , €w_..__:;! -_ i=:1? ? __ _ ,,?fw.• --?---.xQessx?r-_ttzQe_=.
°o
o #1 i r
z ' It tl # -'
I tt1 ?? 1? # l.viWn ?_~
Ex'-= ---i jTi

PARK
DRIVE
EWEN51ON
I
?Zz z
µ°n' i
rp
°a A
"Zn
3szO0n
< 4J
Dnc p
-Z"
-? loz
N
O
Ln
n
?
m o
n-
0
= o Z
0 0
?-1
0

`
t.
I
I ' i
E
I

H I
`, )

} Ja '
ii

m
O
0
o 11
O
1 i
tI I

I :I
I I
1;

tl FI

` i1 1
I i
} i II
OI `r--
i7
C .?.
I f--,'- r fn /
01
MY MT)a)3 r ?, - ! 1
f N X _ _
a _
- ---?QBgGtLR?P-
??,?L.d--_
I / 1

n
V PARK
DRIVE

a
EXrEN510N 9
EXIS

`

\\
??tl I I T iLLt

k R J
U
JSS C Ab
ui?r?Dn
W
a
W
N
N?f
?gn
? o
-rte
z
p
O
X-10 0
=ZZm
Dv=z
330
.0 U)
C
CA _C
z -1
Z
0-tm
IV

1 1
z o 0
?
O

`
\\ ^.
ipl

0
<°
r-m
0,
O
Z 2
O
K
m
w-
DAVID
i
?xo
0
oom<
Oo<
=1ms
X~ Zyf?rl
nJ
'01 C: I
v
r cn r y n
?w m A NIA O
w rn v,,u, o w ri
???1 m.Zi1 ?• 1
K KIK!
v
go e
$O c R?
P
Cl
:z ° ° ..
?Qo
ii°e QA'd
Wbr?°n
W?
M
b
n
H
b
atom
Cy N
0
J E O
EA C
0
z
1
Y
0
7
F?

o
n
z
4s 0

-
?

'1zn

?o z H ws"'?

n z
z0z s
o !?
Q
l?
D
n
n
0
Vn
0 o z
N O
Ci
i
s
V
=zm
z
n 3 ?
0 U)
C C
2?m
w
Eiag
?iu^u
Vi° 3
JE
n
/
r n ``•b
•' s
7u%
---- _--''?' ------ -- -

i I o,,uc ?, V;

Z
D 7
lobo ,.;
lau \ e

-r°

10 i `f' I

s
? 3 n
>OXO
o
M
°o<
r
m?
O °a
zNm
i
tl
a
v
s

T
a
oNO
AQ0
?F'?i?.o`?FO OdO?
MH
R?qp

FH
I
?+ o
F o
O (OmD?
r N P y?o n
:n:n :n --I
-4
O
I ?,mNrn_;y
I A? V m N r
41 m ? 0 0 N
mim rz z
DIDID
i mm
O
v

- c \ 1 ,
` PARK
I` h r
Se z n
0 n DRIVE
EXTENSION
z

Al;
n 11 \
Yn
ZO v •• !
"Zo z
y ?

i

1
0
w
D
m 0
II
O
2 Cj O
O
q
iv
s
0
u
I
io O p
?0?
6 'r~7 O C
znWN
'fl

WW
r?? ? '
_
~w?
m 0
O
O
? N 0
A
;
o
m
n A "?
r
m
ti
?
3 0 0 ? o?
p N N nz
D
yep ?Cy n O _< N

0
U °?

A <
A (j) 0
O e m
N
A
0
T

o O

I

20
A O
?
O0
z o cOp ?I

- N_
O O 1
z

9 ( CI o ?'14? -

i

- 0
MO 00
wed r p

m o
1 0

-I r
1 1 m
rl FFI-F FT
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS IJU11`41 u 2 2005
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
t
?.----•____.._? _ ___..?_.?.__??.._._
IN REPLY REFER TO June 21, 2005
Regulatory Division
Action ID No. 200520149
Mr. Dan Vincent
Governors Club Limited Partnership
Post Office Box 3923
Sanford, NC 27331
Dear Mr. Vincent:
On May 9, 2005, Mr. Bob Zarzecki of Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA, applied for
an after-the-fact Department of the Army permit on your behalf to authorize the proposed
placement of fill material into 0.365 acre of wetlands and 202 linear feet of stream channel
associated with the construction of remaining residential and commercial portions of Governors
Village subdivision. The project site is located east of Mt. Carmel Church Road and north of
Old Farrington Road, southeast of Chapel Hill, Chatham County, North Carolina. The site
contains wetlands and unnamed tributaries to Cub Creek, in the Cape Fear River Basin
After review of your proposal, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) provided
comments by letter dated June 10, 2005 (copy enclosed). The letter states that they are
concerned about the lack of on-site mitigation and recommends that remaining streams and
wetlands be placed in a perpetual conservation easement for the life of the project. The letter
also states that the proposed mitigation ratio is inadequate to compensate for the loss of natural
functions and values associated with the impacted streams and wetlands, and recommends that a
minimum ratio of 2:1 be required.
A comment letter was also received from the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission dated June 15, 2005 (copy enclosed). The letter recommends several permit
conditions, including the preservation of remaining jurisdictional areas on site.
Comments were also received from an adjacent landowner by letter dated June 15, 2005
(copy enclosed). The letter raises concerns regarding the effects of continued commercial and
residential growth in the area, including the impact of fertilizers on drinking water and the loss of
wetland areas.
We are forwarding copies of all letters for your review and consideration, and request that
you respond to this office, in writing, on or before July 21, 2005.
Should you have any further questions related to these comments or your DA permit
application for this project, please contact me at 919-876-8441, extension 26.
Sincerely,

Todd J. Tugwell
Regulatory Project Manager,
Raleigh Field Office
Enclosures
Copy Furnished (with enclosures):
Mr. Bob Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
RECEIVED
United States Department of the Interior JUN 13 2005
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office 'iALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
June 10, 2005
Mr. Todd Tugwell
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Re: Action ID No. 200520149
Dear Mr. Tugwell:
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed Action ID No. 200520149, dated May 19,
2005 whereby Govemors Club Limited Partnership is seeking after-the-fact authorization for the
discharge of fill material into streams and waters of the United States to facilitate the construction of a
residential development and amenities in wetlands and on unnamed tributaries to Cub Creek-in the Cape
Fear River Basin in Wake County, North Carolina. This report is submitted in accordance with the Fish
and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.&C. 661-667d); to be used in your
determination of compliance with 404(b)(1) guidelines (40 CFR 230) and'in your public interest review
(33 CFR 320.4) relative to the protection of fish and wildlife resources.
The proposed project is located in the Governors Village Subdivision east of Mt. Carmel Church Road
and north of Old Farrington Road, southeast of Chapel Hill. According to the Public Notice, the site is
located in a suburban area south of Durham and has been under development for several years. Currently,
northern and western portions of the property contain single and multi-'family units or commercial space.
The southern portion of the project site contains several forested areas and a large stormwater pond
constructed to treat stormwater leaving the site. Two stream channels flow into the pond from existing
portions of the development and both receive considerable runoff from the site. As stated by the
applicant ii1C purpose of the project is to complete construction of a residential development, and to
provide office, retail and other commercial services for residents in the surrounding community.
This permit request is for after-the-fact authorization to impact streams and wetlands associated with a
partially completed development. Many of the impacts to waters of the U.S, natural areas, and associated
wetlands have already occurred. The project is a mixed use development that includes residential and
commercial areas. Development of the site began in the mid 1990's and has progressed from the northern
portions of the property to the south. During initial stages of the project, the Corps provided permit
authorization for all existing and proposed impacts, however, the authorization expired before all impacts
could be completed. The applicant is applying for reauthorization for an unauthorized road crossing and
all remaining unfinished impacts. Impacts to wetlands associated with the proposed development total
0.365 acres, including 0.034 acres of temporary impacts. Impacts to stream channels associated with the
proposed activity total 202 linear feet, including 54 linear feet of temporary impacts. The total loss of all
waters of the U.S. is 0.425 acres. The applicant proposes mitigation for the proposed loss of natural
areas, streams and wetlands by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP)
in the amount necessary to restore 148 linear feet of perennial stream channel, and 0.367 acres of riparian
wetlands. The applicant has proposed a mitigation ratio of 1:1, however, no mitigation for the conversion
of open waters is proposed.
The project would involve extensive clearing, grading, excavation, and fill for the construction of lots,
homes, roads, stormwater facilities and associated infrastructure. Impacts would result from the
placement of fill material, culverts and rip rap, and applicant has not proposed any on-site mitigation for
the proposed impacts to streams, wetlands, and riparian areas. The stream, wetlands and natural areas
proposed to be impacted by the project provide important ecological and hydrological functions for the
receiving waters of Cub Creek and ultimately B. Everett Jordan Lake. The increase in the amount of
impervious surface will alter the character of stormwater runoff leaving the site, and if untreated, this
runoff could have an adverse affect on the quality of aquatic habitats that receive water from the project
site. The Service is concerned about the indirect and cumulative impacts of multiple phase projects
requiring multiple federal section 404:permits, particularly for impacts to natural systems that have
already occurred. We are also concerned about the lack of on-site mitigation for proposed impacts to
these natural areas and recommend that the applicant place any remaining wetlands or streams on the site
in a perpetual conservation easement for the life of the project to protect the remaining ecological
functions of these natural areas. Appropriate erosion and sediment controls should be required for all
aspects of the project to protect adjacent aquatic habitats as a condition of any section 404 permit for the
proposed project, and these measures should be aggressively implemented and maintained to prevent the
transport of sediment to adjacent streams, wetlands and natural areas. Additionally, we find that the
proposed mitigation ratio of 1:1 is inadequate to compensate for the loss of natural functions and values
associated with the proposed impacts to streams and wetlands. The mitigation required for this project
should be increased from the proposed amount to a minimum of 2:1 to compensate for the natural
functions lost due to permanent impacts to streams and wetlands subject to section 404 of the Clean
Water Act.
In order to affect fish and wildlife conservation and to fulfill the public trust stewardship obligations in
this matter, the Service recommends that remaining wetlands and streams on the site be placed under
permanent protective instruments for the life of the project. Additionally, appropriate stormwater
treatment, and sediment controls are a necessary condition for this project to protect the aquatic life and
water quality of the receiving streams downstream of this development. We also recommend that
additional mitigation be required to adequately compensate for the permanent loss of streams and
wetlands associated with the project. If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact
Mr. Mark D. Bowers of my staff at (919) 8564520 (Ext. 19) or at the above address.
Si cer ,
?v
Pete B jamin,
Ecological Services Supervisor
cc: NMFS - Beaufort
EPA - Atlanta
NCWRC-Raleigh
0 North. Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 0
Richard B. Hamilton, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. Todd Tugwell, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
U.S. y Corps of Engineers
FROM: Shan L. Bryant, Piedm nt Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: 15 June 2005
SUBJECT: Public Notice for Governors Club Limited Partnership for Construction of Governors
Village Subdivision (After-the-Fact), Chatham County, North Carolina. Action 1D No.
200520149
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
subject document and we are familiar with the habitat values of the area. Our comments are provided in
accordance with provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (as amended), Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act '(48 Stat. 401, as amended,; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d? and North Carolina General Statutes (G.S. 113-131
et seq-).
The project is a mixed use development including single and mufti-family residential units and
commercial space. Two stream channels now through the site into a large stormwater pond. The
applicant had received permit authorization for all existing and proposed impacts. However, the
authorization expired before all impacts were completed. One of the road crossings was constructed after
permit authorization expired. The applicant is applying for reauthorization for the unauthorized road
crossing and all remaining impacts. Proposed impacts to stream channels resulting from placement of fill
material, culverts, rip rap and/or utility lines totals 202 linear feet, including 54 linear feet of temporary
impact. Proposed impacts to wetlands resulting from the placement of culverts, fill material, rip rap, and
utility lines totals 0.365 acre including 0.034 acre of temporary impact. The applicant proposes 1:1
mitigation for impacts to stream channels and wetlands associated with the project by providing payment
into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) for the restoration of 148 linear feet
of stream channel and 0.365 acre riparian wetlands. No mitigation for impacts to open waters has been
proposed.
Unnamed tributaries to Cub Creek flow through the site. Cub Creek is a headwater tributary to
the upper New Hope Creek arm of B.E. Jordan Reservoir in the Cape Fear River basin. The upper New
Hope Creek arm of B.E. Jordan Reservoir is on the State's 303(d) list of impaired waters. There are
records for the federal and state threatened bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) near the project site.
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries - 1721 Mail Service Center - Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
z'd SZ9G-Ebb-9EE -4ueiRug -1'S eSl-:6o SO ST unr
Page 2
15 June 2005
Governor's Village
Action ID No. 200520149
Additionally, B.E. Jordan Reservoir supports a diverse fishery including largemouth bass (Micropterus
salmoides), crappie (Pomoxis spp_), sunfish (Lepomis spp.), catfish (Ictalurus spp.) and striped bass
(Moron s=atilis).
We hesitate to concur with the piping of stream channels due to the potential for long-term.and
cumulative impacts. Stream pipingand placing fill in aquatic resources can result in significant negative
impacts to downstream areas and eliminate fish and wildlife habitat. Stream piping reduces the
infiltration of stormwater and associated pollutants, as well as the dissipation'of stream energy. Piping a
stream and placing it underground removes both aquatic and terrestrial habitat. Piping a stream channel
and filling the wetlands will alter the hydrology of the existing channel. and eliminate beneficial functions.
Likewise we hesitate to concur with the filling of wetlands due to their wildlife habitat value and the well-
known beneficial functions that they provide for flood control and water quality protection.. Changes in
land use from a primarily forested area to an urban landscape may exacerbate channel degradation and
sediment impacts to stream ecosystems due to increased stormwater runoff. Multiple studies have shown
that stream degradation occurs at 10% impervious (Schueler 1994; Arnold and Gibbons 1996; Doll et al.
2000; Mallin et al. 2000; May and Homer 2000; Stewart et al. 2000; Paul and Meyer 2001).
Since the applicant had previous permit authorization for the proposed impacts, we will not object
to the project provided the following conditions are incorporated into the permit to further reduce. impacts
to fish and wildlife resources.
1. To minimize additional stream impacts, while retaining some measure of wildlife habitat, we
recommend that a I00-foot undisturbed, native, forested buffer along perennial streams, and a 50-
foot buffer along intermittent streams and wetlands. Maintaining undisturbed, forested buffers
along these areas will minimize impacts to fish and wildlife resources, water quality,: and aquatic
habitat both within and downstream of the project area- In addition, wide riparian buffers are
helpful in maintaining stability of stream banks and for treatment of pollutants associated with
stormwater runoff. Whereas, a grassed buffer, particularly fescue, is a vegetated buffer. but will
not provide the necessary and highly valuable functions as discussed for forested buffers.
2. We recommend that all remaining wetlands and streams on the site should be protected from
additional impacts by placing them in a permanent conservation easement to prohibit filling,
draining, flooding, and excavation.
3. Use bridges for all permanent roadway crossings of streams aid associated wetlands to eliminate
the need to fill and culvert, where practicable. If culverts must be used, the culvert should be
designed to allow passage of aquatic organisms. Generally, this means that the culvert or pipe
invert is buried at least one foot below the natural streambed. If multiple cells are required, the
second and/or third cells should be placed so that their bottoms are at stream bankfull stage. This
will allow sufficient water depth in the culvert or pipe during normal flows to accommodate
movements of aquatic organisms. If culverts are long and sufficient slope exists, baffle systems
are recommended to trap gravel and provide resting areas for fish and other aquatic organisms. If
multiple pipes or cells are used, at least one pipe or box should be designed to remain dry during
normal flows to allow for wildlife passage. In addition, culverts or pipes should be situated so
that no channel realignment or widening is required. Widening of the stream channel at the inlet
or outlet of structures usually causes a decrease in water velocity causing sediment deposition that
will require future maintenance. Finally, riprap should not be placed on the streambed.
4. To adequately protect streams, it is suggested that impervious surface is limited to less than 10%0_
Suggested examples to accomplish the <10% impervious goal are using conventional designs at a
c C7QJ _a4_4._QVf.1 -%III-a_1Q •1 Ol.T -
Page 3
15 June 2005
Governor's Village
Action ID No. 200520149
level of <10% imperviousness or using conservation clusters with higher densities, with dedicated
open space and other stormwater control measures to mimic the hydrograph consistent with an
impervious coverage of less than 10%.
5. Locate sewers and other utilities as far away from creeks as functionally possible and minimize
stream crossings. It is preferable that sewers be located outside the riparian buffers. The
directional bore (installation of utilities beneath the riverbed, avoiding impacts to the stream and
buffer) stream crossing method should be used for utility crossings wherever practicable, and the
open cut stream crossing method should only be used when water level is low and stream flow is
minimal. Manholes or similar access structures should not be allowed within buffer areas.
Stream crossings should be near perpendicular (75° to 105' ) to stream flow and should be
monitored at least every three months for maintenance needs during the first 24 months of the
project and then annually thereafter. Further, pesticides (including insecticides and herbicides)
should not be used for maintenance of rights-of-way within 100 feet of perennial streams and 50
feet of intermittent streams, or within floodplains and wetlands associated with these streams.
6. We recommend that landscaping consist of non-invasive native species and LID technology.
Using native species instead of ornamentals should provide benefits by reducing the need for
fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides. Additionally, native species should require less water.
Using LID technology in landscaping will not only help maintain the predevelopment hydrologic
regime, but also enhance the aesthetic and habitat value of the site.
7. Specialized efforts and techniques are implemented to reduce sediment runoff from construction
activities. Excessive silt and-sediment loads can. have numerous detrimental'effects on aquatic
resources including destruction of spawning habitat, suffocation of eggs, and clogging of gills of
aquatic species.
It is our understanding that compensatory mitigation for wetlands is 2:1 for restoration, 3:1 for
creation, 4:1 for enhancement and 10:1 for preservation (in combination with appropriate
restoration, creation and enhancement). Therefore, we feel that compensatory mitigation for
impact to wetlands should be 2:1.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. If we can provide further assistance,
please contact our office at [phone].
Literature cited
Arnold, C. L., and C. L Gibbons. 1996. Impervious surface coverage-the emergence of a key
environmental indicator. Journal of the American Planning Association 62:243-258.
Doll, B. A., D. E. Wise Frederick, C. M. Buckner, S. D. Wilkerson, W. A. Harman, and R_ E. Smith
2000. Hydraulic geometry relationships for urban streams throughout the piedmont of North
Carolina. Pages 299-304 in P. J. Wigington, Jr. and R. L. Beschta, eds. Proceedings of the
American Water Resources Association International Conference on riparian ecology and
management in multi-land use watersheds, Portland, Oregon.
Mallin, M. A., K E. Williams, E. C. Esham, and R. P. Lowe. 2000. Effect of human development on
bacteriological water quality in coastal watersheds. Ecological Applications 10(4):1047-1056.
f,'d G?91.-R?sis-9FF aueRitr •'l 'Q ecr :rn en cr unr
R ' Page 4
15 June 2005
Governor's Village
Action ID No. 200520149
May, C. W. and R. R. Horner. 2000. The cumulative impacts of watershed urbanization on stream
riparian ecosystems. Pages 281-286 in P. J. Wigington, Jr. and R_ L. Beschta, eds. Proceedings
of the American Water Resources Association International Conference on riparian ecology and
management in multi-land use watersheds, Portland, Oregon.
Paul, M. J., and J. I.. Meyer. 2001. Streams in the urban landscape. Annual Review of Ecology and
Systematics 32:333-365.
Schueler, T. 1994. The importance of imperviousness. Watershed Protection Techniques. 1(3):100-
111.
Stewart, J. S., D. M. Downes, L. Wang, J. A. Wierl, and R. Bannerman. 2000. Influences of riparian
corridors on aquatic biota in agricultural watersheds. Pages 209-214 in P. J. Wigington, Jr. and
R. L. Beschta, eds. Proceedings of the American Water Resources Association International
Conference on riparian ecology and management in multi-land use watersheds, Portland, Oregon.
cc: Cyndi Karoly, DWQ
C -d g7gr_-R4ifs-qPP '4UeRja *I'S eqi :sn Sn Si unr
e,-
John W. Carpenter
Sue A. Carpenter
256 Old Farrington Road
Chapel Hill, NC 27517
SENT VIA 2ND DAY MAIL SERVICE
June 15, 2005
% U
JUN 16 2005
Mr. Todd Tugwell
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road
Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
REF: Corps Action ID #200520149
Dear Mr. Tugwell:
We are writing in response to the PUBLIC NOTICE letter dated May 19, 2005. To fully
understand the impact of the permit request, we cannot do so based on this letter alone.
However, we will submit the following observations:
Increased number of residential and commercial buildings identified on your
enclosed materials (Maps AID #200520149 sheets 4-7, clearly is impacting
clean water. (See Notice from Chatham County Water System enclosed).
Owners (commercial and residential) continue to use massive amounts of
fertilizers to beautify their lawns and gardens. The materials end of washing
into the creek identified on Maps AID #200520149 Sheet 2 and into Jordan
Lake and eventually into our drinking water.
The developer needs to provide alternative methods to avoid wetland loss
such as allowing more open space. The ground water is effected not only by
the construction equipment identified on page 2 "Project Description" and
page 3, but on the area as a whole once homes are erected.
It is inevitable growth will occur but developers and government must implement and
adhere to a "Smart Growth" plan to protect wetlands in the county and throughout our
neighborhoods.
Thank you for your prompt attention in this matter.
Sincerely,
k.'IC'Llohfaenter
Enclosure
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR DRINKING WATER
CHATHAM COUNTY WATER SYSTEM Has Not Met Monitoring Requirements
We are required to monitor your drinking water for specific contaminants on a regular basis. Results of regular monitoring
are an indicator of whether or not our drinking water meets health standards. During the compliance period(s) specified in
the table below, we rdid not monitor or test'or `did not complete all monitoring or testing? for the contaminants group(s)
listed and therefore cannot be sure of the quality of our drinking water during that time.

CONTAMINANT GROUP" ENTRY POINT/
LOCATION CODE COMPLIANCE PERIOD
BEGIN DATE SAMPLING
FREQUENCY WHEN SAMPLES WERE OR
WILL BE TAKEN
(Water System to Complete)
BACTERIOLOGICAL DISTRIBUTION 12/03,8104-11104 MONTHLY 12/04
DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCTS DISTRIBUTION 07/04 QUARTERLY 01105
CHLORINE RESIDUALS DISTRIBUTION 08/04-11104 MONTHLY 12/04
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON DISTRIBUTION 01/04-08/04,10/04-11/04 MONTHLY 12104

See pack or this notice for the complete list of individual contaminants for each contaminant group
What should I do? There is nothing you need to do at this time.
What happened? What is being done? When will the problem be corrected?
Due to the timing of personnel change, some of our testing was incomplete. Currently, we have fully staffed and trained personnel
on the proper way to collect samples. Samples are now being collected in a timely manner and currently in compliance. These
problems have now been corrected. To ensure the control of disinfection by-products, we have done a progressive flushing
program as well as increased monitoring.
Please share this information with all the other people who drink this water, especially those who may not have received
this notice directly (for example, people in apartments, nursing homes, schools, and businesses). You can do this by
posting this notice in a public place or distributing copies by hand or mail.
For more
contact:
Responsible Person I System Name ISystemAddress-POBOX910 I
WH.L BAKER CHATHAM CO WATER SYSTEM
'hone Number I System PWSID # 0319126 I System Address - Pittsboro, NC 27312 I
119-542-8270
/iolation Awareness Date: 2/14/05
)ate Notice Distributed: l0' l'O? Method of Distribution:
Public Notification Certification: I
he public water syste named above hereby affirms that public notification has been provided to its consumers in
ccordance with all ve , con ent, format, and deadline requirements specified in 15A NCAC 18C.1523.
owner/Operator: Y? ?j`1?-?; clT S f
(Signa re) (Print Name) (Date)
imap://debbie. edwards%40dwq. [e-mail]:143/...
Subject: RE: Governors Village
From: "Bob Zarzecki" <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 11:51:21 -0400
To: "Debbie Edwards \(DWQ\)" <[e-mail]>, "Eric Kulz \(RRO\)"
<[e-mail]>
Debbie & Eric,
I would appreciate any comments regarding this project' anytime prior to our
meeting (proposed for the week of June 27th). I would like to address any
potential conditions of the Water Quality Certification in this meeting if
at all possible. We can address any minor issues without the need for a
formal letter. However, if you think that there will be any major
conditions or issues, then it would probably be best to request these in a
formal letter. Please let me know your availability for the week of June
27th.
Thanks.
- Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Zarzecki [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 10:45 AM
To: Todd Tugwell (USACE); Debbie Edwards (DWQ); Eric Kulz (RRO)
Subject: RE: Governors Village
To All:
I spoke to Todd Tugwell today. The Public Notice for Governors Village went
out either today or yesterday. It is not yet on the USACE web site. I am
submitting a request to EEP for 148 feet of stream (1:1) and 0.75 acres of
riparian wetlands (2:1) as per Todd's guidance. I would like to request a
meeting after the Public Comment period ends. Please let me know your
availability for the week of June 27th.
Regards.
Bob
----- original Message-----
From: Bob Zarzecki [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 11:00 AM
To: Todd Tugwell (USACE); Debbie Edwards (DWQ); Eric Kulz (RRO)
Subject: Governors Village
To All,
You will be receiving the after-the-fact Individual Permit for Governors
Village today. It is on 8 1/2 x 11 sheets as the Corps requested. I have
also provided a CD with the entire document in pdf format to aid you in
your review and records. I will attempt to attach it to this email as well,
but it may be too large of a file.
Please contact me if you require any additional information or would like to
schedule a time to meet at the site.
We would also like to schedule a follow up meeting once the public comment
period ends. Please let me know what days and times you have available for
this meeting during the week of June 13th or later.
Sincerely,
Bob Zarzecki
1 of 1 9/14/2005 3:37 PM
imap://[e-mail]:143/...
Subject: [Fwd: concerns]
From: Shelton Sullivan <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 12:54:52 -0400
To: Debbie Edwards <[e-mail]>
Subject: concerns
From: Shelton Sullivan <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 12:41:01 -0400
To: Danny Smith <[e-mail]>
Governor's Village
1) Road Crossing Impact 2
Please explain possibilities of minimizing the linear ft. of stream impact at Impact
2: Including relocation of the road, building a headwall, etc. If this cannot
be achieved, explain in detail.
2) Stormwater
Explain how the development is and will be in full compliance with current Water
Supply Watershed regulations. This project appears to have ares of high density and
areas of low density. For the areas of high density, explain how the stormwater will
be treated to obtain an 85% reduction in TSS. For the areas of low density,
explain how the stormwater will be transported by vegetated conveyances to the
maximum extent practicable.
3) Additional Wetland impacts around 3C and 3 D?
The plans indicate a treeline much different than what now exists in the field.
Explain if and how these trees are to be removed from the wetland.
4) Please copy your response to Shelton Sullivan, DWQ NPS Assistance and Compliance
Oversight Unit, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC, 27699-1617
Thanks
Shelton
1 of 1 7/12/2005 11:33 AM
imap:Hdebbie. [e-mail]:143/...
Subject: Re: Govorners Village
From: Eric Kulz <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 12:05:01 -0400
To: Debbie Edwards <[e-mail]>
Debbie:
Sorry, I was out sick Tuesday and yesterday. My only real comment involves maybe
getting them to look hard at some on-site mitigation for the unpermitted stream
crossing. I know we are going to ask them for alternatives to this crossing, even
though it is existing (I think we all agreed that the angle of the crossing would not
have been permitted). Although there probably isn't much left on the site that is not
planned to be "protected", except for the small area in the former pond footprint
(Impact Area #4).
Eric
Debbie Edwards wrote:
Eric,
I would like to get that hold letter out for Governors Village today, would you
send me what you would like included in the letter.
thanks,
Debbie
Eric Kulz <Eric.Kulznancmail.net>
Environmental Specialist III j
NC Division of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection
1 of 1 7/12/2005 11:33 AM
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact:
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Governors Village c/o Dan Vincent, Governors Club County Chatham
Project Number 05 0810 County2
Recvd From APP Region Raleigh
Received Date 519105 Recvd By Region
Project Type Residential & Commercial
Certificates Stream
Permit: Wetland ' Wetland `Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
F IP 6TH WT _0N F-1641-2-10 WSIV NSW 30,605. 5.37F
'Stream O;Y O,N F- 16-41-2-10 F_F_30>605. F7__ 202.00
F_ P770 N F F__F_-rI -rI -rI - F_
. -
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y O N Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/fond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 355106 Longitude (ddmmss) 790129
Comments:
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Triage Check List.
oj V a7 -e_
'eEt Name. r
Date: Pr'
County: Ld L2 ,61i
To: ? ARO Kevin Barnett ? wa.R.O Tom Steffens and Kyle Barnes
? FRO Ken Averitte ? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
?O Alan Johnson ? WSRO Daryl Lamb
LI RRO Mike Horan
From: 2? Telephone : (919)
The file attached. is being forwardec?o . our for your evaluation.
Please call if you need!as ' tance.
? 'Stream length impacted '?
? Stream determination °.
? wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface'.waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings? -
? Cumulative impact concern
-
Comments.
Triage Check List.
Date; rroje6t Name.
DWQ#:
County:
To: ? ARO Kevin Barnett ? WaRO Tom Steffens and Kyle Barnes
? FRO Ken Averitte ? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
?O Alan Johnson ? WSRO Daryl Lamb
L RRO Mike Horan
From: 2? Telephone : (919)
The file attached is being forwarded"io , our for your evaluation.
Please call if you need`as 'stance. Stream length impacted `?
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface,.waters on USFW topo maps
? Muumization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
fx
<
? Mitigation Ratios ,
Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable„''
? Check drawings for accuracy j
El Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings? I 'f
? Cumulative impact concern
• C ?-2 d?, o` 1Df
Comments. fLI
1 05081.0. Ong QoHaL
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road. • Raleigh, North' Carolina 27614 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
' www.SandEC.com
F! f s r -'I
May 9, 2005
R IL C L' i V 1 D S&EC Project
# 93 5.w1 _
' To: US Army Corps of Engineers. -: NA Division of Water Quality
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office - 401 Oversight and Express Pe D ' niL
' Attn: Todd Tugweil Attn: Cyndi Karoly I? c5? D
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suit
Raleigh, North Cerolina 27615 Raleigh, NC 276042260 MAY
2005.
' From: Bob Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A. DENR - WATER QUAUTy
11010 Raven Ridge Road WETLANDS AND STORMMTER BRANGy
Raleigh, NC 27614
' Re: Governors Village, Chapel Hitt, NC - "After-the-Fact" Individual Permit Application
On behalf of the owner, Governors Club Limited Partnership, please find attached a complete
' application and supplemental information requesting an Individual Permit from the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) and an Individual Certification from the N.C. Division of Water
Quality (DWQ). Please contact me at (919) 846-59W if you have any questions or require
additional information.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name Governors Village
Project Type Commercial & Residential Development
Owner / Applicant Governors Club Limited Partnership
Count Chatham
Nearest Town Chapel Hill
Waterbod Name UT to Cub Creek
Basin / Sub-basin 03-06-05
Index Number i641-2-10-(0.5)
Class WS4V, NSW
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0.019
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.365
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.041
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.425
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 202
Attachments:
Individual Permit Application Form & Block Sheets
Agent Authorization
Farrington, NC - USGS Map
Chatham County Soil Survey Map
Sae Photos
Impact Map Sheets
Wetland & Stream Forms
Prior Project History (including jurisdictional determination, past approvals, etc.)
Mitigation Plan
Public Interest Issues
$475 Application Fee to DWQ
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT OMB APPROVAL N0. 0710-0003
(33 CFR 325) Expires December 31, 2004
The Public burden for this collection of information is sestimated to average 10 hours per response, although the majority of applications should require
5 hours or less. This includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of
information, eluding suggestions for reducing this burden.. to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of Information
Opetations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington. VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget,
Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC 20503. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law,
no person shelf be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information it it does not display a currently valid OMB conuoi
number. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having
iurisdiation over the location of the proposed so0vity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403,' Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research and
Sanctuaries Act, 33 USG 1413, Section 103. Principal Purpose: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application for a
permit. Routine Uses:' This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and weal government agencies.
Submission of requested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit
be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this
application tree sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer staving jurisdiction over the location of the proposed
activity. An application that is not completed in full wig be returned.
frAfS 1 FN U 4 rO BE Fftt FD By HE cows)
1_ APPLICATION NO
5 APPLICANT'S NA
2.
FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED' 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
i1TFMS RFI 1) IN Tn RF FII I.rn 8V GODI )CANn -
ME S. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE !ter epm(k n aiv df
Governors Club Limited Partnership S&EC, PA - Bob Zarzecki, Env, Spec.
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS' 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS
c/o DanVincent 11010 Raven Ridge Road
PO Box 3923, Sanford, NC 27331 Raleigh, NC 27614
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS VJIAREA CODE 10. AGENT'S PHONE NOS. WrAREA CODE
3. Residence a. Residence
b. Business [phone] b. -Business [phone]
11, STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
I hereby authorize, * see Aaent Authorization to act in mybeha4 as my agent in the proce, ing of this application and to
v'urnrh, upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application.
' APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE
' NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE rsee?sr K w u•
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
13. NAME OF WATERBODY. IF KNOWN 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (?rag?oic?
UT to Cub Creek Governors Village
Village Park Drive
' 15. LOCATION OF PROJECT Vi Chapel Hill, NC 27517
Chatham
COUNTY NC STATE
' 16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS; IF KNOWN, rsa• nsnuct ,x /
LAT 35.8515587 N /"LONG 79.024759 W
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
The site is located in Governors Village onMt. Carmel Church Road, Chatham County, 14C. To
get to the site from Raleigh: Take 40 West to NC54, Exit 273A toward Chapel Hill; Turn left
onto Farrington Rd (follow signs towards Governors Club); Take Farrington Rd to tit. Cannel
Church Road; Turn right on Mt. Carmel Church Rd; Turn right into Governors Village.
E?G FORM 4346, Jul 97 EDITION OF FES 9415 OBSOLETE. (Proponent: CECW-OM
N
IS. Nature of Activity (aesrsut- orirc;vvr, r n,dc Nt r? r.]
see attached "Block 18e
19. Prajectf'tarpaserrxmrnerne - arpsfuoorzner.-ofecY,,xeinwa,Y;«ui
see attached "Block 19"
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO JE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
see attached "Block 20"
' 21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Tvoe in Cubic Yard;
see attached "Block 21
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled c<ar v ro r
see attached "Block 22"
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes No 1- IF YES. DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
see attached "Block 23"
24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Oviners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Watarbody (If more than can be entered here,
please attach a supplemental list).
see attached "Block 24"
'Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building end flood plain permits
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAI I IDFNTIFICATION NtIMRFR nATF APPI IFr) r)ATF APPAr1VFr1 r)ATC rlr6nrn
SEE ATTACHED "BLOCK 25"
USAGE 404 1995503160, etc. 1 04/10/96 04/26/96 n/a
DWQ 401 96-0362 ; 04/10/96 06/08/96 n/a
?
DWQ 401 96-0884 09/05/96 10/18/96
n/a
26. Application is hereby made tot a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this
application is complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the
duty authorized agent of the applicant.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE S E' F A NT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activiry (applicent) or it may be signed by a duty
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C, Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than 510,000 or Imprisoned not more than five years or both.
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
BLOCK SHEETS
BLOCK 18 - Nature of Activity
The project involves the completion of development of Governors Village mixed-use
commercial and residential subdivision located in northern Chatham County, NC. As
described further in Block 23, much of the development has already been completed.
Construction of Governors Village began in the mid-1990s. Approvals have been
received by both the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE; Action ID 199503160 and
199600078) and the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ; Project No. 96-0392 and 96-
0884). No additional impacts to waters beyond those previously approved or requested
within this application are anticipated at this time.
The applicant is requesting approval to impact waters for an existing road crossing (see
Impact Map #2 and the USACE Notification of Unauthorized Activity provided in the
attached Prior Project History section of this application). In addition to this road
crossing the applicant is requesting approval to impact wetlands and waters for the
construction of one additional road crossing (see Impact Map #3), utility crossings and lot
fill. Many of these impacts were previously approved, but they have not yet occurred and
the previous approvals have expired. These activities and the dimensions of the
structures are illustrated in the attached "Impact Maps".
The materials to be used include earthen fill to construct the base for the roads and lots.
' The roads and parking areas will be paved and use curb and gutter to manage stormwater
runoff. Paving materials include asphalt and concrete. Curb and gutter materials include
concrete metal drop inlets and reinforced concrete pipes (RCP). The existing road
' crossing (see Impact Map #2) was constructed using twin 42" RCPs (see Site Photo).
The proposed second crossing (see Impact Map#3) will be installed using a single 54"
RCP. The residential structures both already built and proposed include stick-built
' single-family homes and townhomes with concrete driveways and walks. The
commercial buildings are constructed of typical commercial building materials including
primarily steel, concrete block, brick and glass.
The previously approved and constructed pond commonly referred to as the "Village
Pond" is a large, stormwater management pond required by the County to meet the
Chatham County Water Supply watershed stormwater requirements for Governors
Village (see attached letter from Chatham County dated April 29, 2005 provided within
the attached Prior Project History section of this application). Stormwater runoff from
Governors Village (including the proposed development areas not currently constructed)
drain to and are managed by this pond.
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
' BLOCK SHEETS
' BLOCK 19 - Project Purpose
' Project Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to complete construction of development of Governors
Village, a mixed-use commercial and residential development located between Mt.
Carmel Church Road, Whipporwill Lane and Old Farrington Road in northern Chatham
' County, NC. There are basically three properties that have not been developed within
Governors Village. The properties north and west of the "Village Pond" were previously
approved by the USACE and DWQ for impacts to wetlands and waters. The property
' east of the "Village Pond" was added to Governors Village this spring. No jurisdictional
wetlands or waters are proposed to be impacted on this property other than the road
crossing impacts (see Impact Map #3) to connect this property to the rest of Governors
' Village. Properties to the south of the "Village Pond" are not part of Governors Village
and consist of existing residential properties.
' Project Need:
Governors Village provides retail, office, other commercial services and housing for
residents within the surrounding community as well as existing and future residents
within Governors Village. This development helps to address service and housing needs
of the community's growing population.
I

GOVERNORS VILLAGE
BLOCK SHEETS
BLOCK 20 - Reasons for Discharge
Proposed Commercial / Retail Area - The wetland impact proposed on Impact Map #I is
required to complete construction of the commercial / retail section of Governors Village
previously planned for the development in the mid-1990s. These impacts were
previously approved by both the USACE and DWQ (see the Prior Project History section
attached to this application).
Existing Road Crossing - The existing road crossing (see Impact Map #2) was required
to provide a second access for the existing townhomes north of the "Village Pond". The
crossing not along improves traffic flow through Governors Village, it also provides for
multiple points of ingress and egress in case of any emergency.
Proposed Second Crossing - The proposed second crossing (see Impact Map #3) is
required to connect the new 49-lot single-family residential subdivision east of "Village
Pond" to the remainder of Governors Village. Without this crossing the residents of this
community would need to utilize existing state roads (Old Farrington Road, etc.) and at
least one intersection of state roads just to drive from their home to the retail area of
Governors Village. This is not only twice the distance it will also lead to unnecessary
traffic congestion on these state roads. In addition to connecting the subdivision to the
remainder of Governors Village, this crossing will provide a second point of ingress and
egress for the community.
Proposed Townhomes - The wetland impact proposed on Impact Map #4 is to fill
' wetlands within a drained pond bottom to allow for the construction of residential
townhomes west of the "Village Pond". This property (previously known as the Dossett
Parcel) has recently been approved by Chatham County for the construction of 76
' townhomes from the previously approved commercial / office development. The wetland
area has a surface connection to the "Village Pond" via a channel that is not depicted on
either the USGS topographic map or Chatham County Soil Survey. The channel was
determined by S&EC staff to be an ephemeral ditch below the wetland / drained pond
' and above the existing walking trail around the "Village Pond". The applicant does not
dispute the jurisdiction of this wetland area or it's determination as non-isolated.
However it should be noted that S&EC staff do not believe that this original pond in this
' location was constructed on either an intermittent or perennial stream. The quality and
functions of this wetland area are low compared to other wetland systems.
' Utilities - Impacts to wetlands and waters for utility crossings are also proposed on
Impact Maps #2 and #3. These impacts are required to provide utility services to
development areas described within this application.
t

GOVERNORS VILLAGE
BLOCK SHEETS
BLOCK 21 - Type of Material Being Discharged and the
Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
Wetland Impact
Type Type of Area of Volume of
Site Number
Type of Impact
(e.g., fores
forested
marsh Material Impact Discharge
indicate on
( ,
,
,
herbaceous, bog, etc.)
Bein
Bein

(sq yds.)

(cubic yds.)
ma Di
Discharged * **
Map #1, IA Commercial Fill Herbaceous No 533 178
Map #1, 1B Rip-Rap Dissipater Herbaceous No 39 13
Map #2,2A Utility (temporary) Herbaceous No 59 20
Map #3, 3C Utility (temporary) Headwater Forest No 107 36
Map #4 Residential Fill Herbaceous
(Drained Pond) No 1,031 344
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 591
* Areas are rounded up to the nearest square yard.
** Volumes are rounded up to the nearest cubic yard and assume wetlands to be 0.333 yards
deep and do not account for discharge materials above this 0.333-yard assumed depth.
STREAM IMPACT TABLE
Stream Impact
Type of
Area of Impact Volume of
Number Stream Type of Perennial or
Material Being
(sq
yds.) Discharge
(indicate on Name Impact Intermittent?
Discharged * (cubic yds.)
map)
Map #2, 2A UT Telmty
P• Perennial 3 10 4
Map #2, 2B UT Road Perennial 3 39 13
Map #2,2C UT Rip-Rap Perennial 5 20 7
Map #3,3D UT Telmty
P Intermittent 2-5 25 9
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 33
* Areas are rounded up to the nearest square yard.
** Volumes are rounded up to the nearest cubic yard and assume an average depth of streams
to be 0.333 yards and do not account for discharge materials above this 0.333-yard assumed
depth.
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
BLOCK SHEETS
BLOCK 21 - Type of Material Being Discharged and the
Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards (cont.)
OPEN WATER IMPACT TABLE
(Including all Waters of US excluding Wetlands, Intermittent Streams & Perennial
Streams listed above.)
Open Water Type of Waterbody
Impact Type of (lake, pond, estuary, Area of Impact Volume of Discharge
Site Number Impact sound, bay, ocean, (sq*yds.) (cub** yds.)
indicate on ma etc.
Map #3, 3A UT Road 78 26
Map #3, 313 UT Rip-Rap Dissipater 121 41
Total Open Water Impact (acres) 67
* Areas are rounded up to the nearest square yard.
** Volumes are rounded up to the nearest cubic yard and assume an average depth of streams
to be 0.333 yards and ponds to be 1 yard and do not account for discharge materials above
these assumed depths.
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
BLOCK SHEETS
BLOCK 22 - Surface Areas of Wetlands and Other
Waters Filled
WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number
Type of Impact
(e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
ma es/no linear feet
Map #1, IA Commercial Fill Herbaceous No 48 0.110
Map #1, 1B Rip-Rap Dissipater Herbaceous No 0 0.008
Map #2,2A** Utility (temporary) Herbaceous No 0 0.012
Map #3, 3C Utility (temporary) Headwater Forest No 0 0.022
Map #4 Residential Fill Herbaceous
(Drained Pond No -200 0.213
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.365
* All impacts have been rounded to the nearest 1/1000 of an acre.
* * Impact 2A included both wetland and stream impacts.
STREAM IMPACT TABLE
Stream Impact
Number Stream
Type of Perennial or Average
Impact Length
Area of Impact
(indicate on Name Impact Intermittent? Stream Width (linear feet) (acres)
map) ** *** Before Impact
Map #2, 2A UT Utility Perennial 3 20 0.002
Temp.
Map #2, 213 UT Road Perennial 3 115 0.008
Map #2, 2C UT Rip-Rap Perennial 5 33 0.004
Map #3, 3D UT Intermittent 2-5 34 0.005
Temp.
p•
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 148 (Perm.) 0.019
54 (Temp.)
* All impacts have been rounded to the nearest 1/1000 of an acre & foot
** UT = Unnamed tributary to Cub Creek (03-06-05, 16-41-2-10-(0.5), WS-IV NSW)
* * * See Stream Forms
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
BLOCK SHEETS
BLOCK 22 - Surface Areas of Wetlands and Other
Waters Filled (cont.)
OPEN WATER IMPACT TABLE
(Including all Waters of US excluding Wetlands, Intermittent Streams & Perennial
Streams listed above.)
Open Water Name of Type of
Impact
Site Number
Waterbody
Type of Impact Waterbody
(lake, pond,
Area of Impact
(indicate on (if applicable) estuary
sound (acres)
ma ,
,
bay, ocean, etc.
Map #3, 3A UT Road Pond 0.016
Map #3, 313 UT Rip-Rap Dissipater Pond 0.025
Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0.041
** UT = Unnamed tributary to Cub Creek (03-06-05, 16-41-2-10-(0.5), WS-IV NSW)
* All impacts have been rounded to the nearest 1/1000 of an acre
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact acres : 0.019
Wetland Impact acres : 0.365
Open Water Impact acres : 0.041
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. acres 0.425
Total Stream Impact linear feet): 202
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
BLOCK SHEETS
BLOCK 23 - Is Any Portion of the Work Already
Complete?
Existing Conditions:
The project involves the completion of the development of the Governors Village
' residential and commercial mixed-use development located on Mt. Carmel Church Road
(SR 1008) in Chatham County, NC. A large portion of the development has already been
constructed, residential and commercial lots have been sold, buildings and homes have
' been constructed, and businesses and residents are occupying their buildings and homes.
The road / driveway crossing depicted on Impact Map #2 has already been constructed.
' The owner believed that all appropriate 404 and 401 approvals had been received at the
time the road was constructed. However, the owner was notified in a letter dated
December 27, 2004 from Mr. Todd Tugwell of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) that this activity was not authorized (Action ID 200520149). The USACE and
' DWQ previously authorized impacts to these waters as described in the attached Prior
Project History. Although as Mr. Tugwell explains in his letter, the permit had expired
prior to construction of the roadway, and the plans have been modified from the
' originally proposed plans.
The additional impacts proposed within this application have not yet been constructed.
Dredged or Fill Material Already Discharged:
' The activities within Waters of the U.S. that have already occurred include the discharge
of fill into wetlands and other waters for the development of roads, utilities, and
commercial and residential lots. Waters have also been impacted by both fill and
' flooding for the construction of the stormwater management pond.
' Previous Agency Involvement & Approvals:
Please refer to the attached Prior Project History for additional information and reference
materials. Approvals have been received from the DWQ (DWQ Project No.(s) 96-0362
' & 96-0884) and USACE (Action ID 199503160 and 199600078) for impacts to 3.889
acres of waters within the Governors Village development. The impacts proposed within
this application include both modifications to these previous approvals and new impacts
not yet approved.
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
BLOCK SHEETS
BLOCK 24 - Names & Addresses of Adjoining Property
Owners, Lessees, et., Whose Property Adjoins the
Project Site.
(The addresses of property owners whose property adjoins the project site (Governors
Village) list below were obtained from the Chatham County GIS website and do not
include current property owners within the project site.)
BB Endeavors, LLC Horton, Todd Brantley
23107 Umstead Road 1742 Old Arbor Way
Chapel Hill, NC 27514 Mebane, NC 27302
Harris, Kelli Leigh & Charles E. McCrimmon, Lewis M. & Linda M.
111 McKenzie Circle 211 Old Farrington Road
Clayton, NC 27302 Chapel Hill, NC 27514
Boggs, Samuel G. Goodwin, Thelma H.
118 Mt. Carmel Church Road 136 Mt. Carmel Church Road
Chapel Hill, NC 27514 Chapel Hill, NC 27514
Wilson, Michael T. & Joan G. Governors Village P.O.A.
172 Mt. Carmel Church Road PO Box 99149
Chapel Hill, NC 27514 Raleigh, NC 27624
Governors Club Ltd. Partnership Village Custom Homes Co.
PO Box 3923 721 Mt. Carmel Church Road
Sanford, NC 27331 Chapel Hill, NC 27517
L & E Holdings, LLC Nature Trail Associates
781 Mt. Carmel Church Road 9073 Nemo Street
Chapel Hill, NC 27516 Los An elas, CA 90069
The Caryle Group, Inc. Cheek, Ben Ford
9073 Nemo Street 1130 Madison Womble Way
Los An elas, CA 90069 Chapel Hill, NC 27514
Sparrow, Carol C. Carolina Meadows, Inc.
204 Graduate Court 100 Carolina Meadows
Durham, NC 27713 Chapel Hill, NC 27517-8505
Porter, Lester Ray Jr. Porter, Donald Brack
998 Whippoorwill Lane 706 Copperline Apt. 102
Chapel Hill, NC 27517-7542 Chapel Hill, NC 27516
Carpenter, John William & Sue A.
256 Old Farrington Road
Chapel Hill, NC 27514

GOVERNORS VILLAGE
BLOCK SHEETS
BLOCK 25 - Information about Approvals or Denials by
other Agencies.

Local Approvals:
Numerous local approvals have been granted for the Governors Village development
including Erosion & Sediment Control Permits, stormwater, subdivision plan approvals,
and many others. These approvals have not been included within this application, but can
be provided upon request.
N.C. Division of Water Quality Compliance:
The N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has approved impacts for the entire
development (DWQ Project No. 96-0362 & 96-0884). Please refer to the attached Prior
Project History section of this application for additional information about these
approvals. The new developer is requesting approval of a water quality certification from
' the DWQ as part of this application.

I
I

IF,
L
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The Current Landowner
r /
Name: 60 er4UPS ???-? tr?rtt? ? cl n??
Address: P.O. -8o u
.5aIA,6(4 4/c 2 733
Phone: _ (119) 6 / S- 605V
Project Name/Description: 0 V" 4. Q r vldzi-q,?
Date: 5-
-T
' The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
' Attn: Todd Tugwell
Field Office: Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
' To Whom It May Concern:
I, the current grglLeIty owner, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA to
' act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon requess
supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The day of
-P1esv 26,05-
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
' NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
government officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC
to arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the site.
Print Property Owner's Name
cc: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NCDENR - DWQ
' 2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
6? "?, V", x" "?"/ ?
Property Owner's Signature
cc: Bob Zarzedd
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Q -7
? - 1. ? - _ - -
1 5r rw??. s. -
Pw3- -
r
i
9
•
LA)
N
Project #: Scale:
9325.w1 KS
Project Date., Farrington, NC Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mgr.: BZ 5.2-05 USGS Quad 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
Govemoes Village [phone] • [phone]
Chatham County, NC Web Page: www.SandEC.com
T
DURHAM COUNTY,

¦!
i ,G= ?# fi wa 5 ? ? .r
T t 4? UU r'. S
2N -fi :. ? z ? .? hr 1?. B ? - N ti T •ryr.
tRs, ?- J y a + 3a= ,4. cK+G 2?, , y(, ? ?r ? ? ? r ..?.
?Y? 5 -?ht t
X-
536-8 = Creedmoor-Green Level Complex, 2 - 6%
536-C = Creedmoor-Green Level Complex, 6 -10%
N 5A = Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 - 2%
Project M Scale:
9325.w1 NTS
Project Date: Chatham County Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mgr.: BZ 05.02.05 Soil Survey 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] - [phone]
Govemoes Village Web Page: www.SandEC.com
Chatham County, NC
Governors Village Parcel "E"; Wetland Impact No. 1A, Wetland Impact Map # 1
Proposed; Photo looking North
Governors Village Parcel "E" Impact No. 1B; Wetland Impact Map # 1;
Proposed; Photo looking North to existing 24" pipe
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
SITE PHOTOS
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
SITE PHOTOS
Stream & Wetlands to be Avoided; South of Impact No. 113, Wetland Impact Map # 1
Stream & Wetlands Avoided; North of Impact No. 2A, Wetland Impact Map # 2
Road Crossing Impact No. 2B & 2C; road is existing and impacts have already occurred;
Area includes portion of Utility Impact No. 2A;
Wetland Impact Map # 2; Photo looking South towards Existing Road Crossing
Wetland & Stream South of Road Crossing Impact No. 2B & 2C;
Wetland Impact Map # 2; Photo looking South towards Existing Walking Trail &
Stormwater Pond
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
SITE PHOTOS
Location of Proposed Road/Driveway Crossing No. 3A & 3B; Wetland Impact Map # 3;
Open Water Impact to back waters of existing stormwater pond;
Photo looking South towards existing Walking Trail & Stormwater Pond
Approximate Location of Proposed Utility / 8" Sanitary Sewer Crossing;
Temporary Impacts to Stream & Wetland;
Impact No. 3C & 31); Wetland Impact Map # 3
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
SITE PHOTOS
Typical Wetlands & Stream Avoided; Wetland Impact Map # 3
Aerial Photo of Drained Pond; Wetland Impact Map # 4;
2002 Photo taken from Chatham County GIS Website
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
SITE PHOTOS
xa2zn ?
$41< n
Dent "o
M zz 1
o.
0
o
L IX3 SIX3 NOISN31X3
]AM
I
...,, dOOI u?N'd?J9 hLiOf "`? ;,e I
- d
o I I
OWM
I
/ ?,?rla
? Q
v
1 I 1
z: / i I\\ 1 I :I -------- --' '
I
LLB
/ J W _ r ; 8 ? I
U' JL o '
Ida
1 II-
_I 3? ?? I _- 1 r
I-
I
I
1 f-__ __ J I - 1 ?
l r ?_; oG 1- Z 1
J L O I
--j L
12
4 _ ' G I
/ L I i' ? l ;I
, = y Ih _ ?? ? aim
1
f - -y h__ ? 1 ? 1 J n
I r 1 - --J Q'(O ?(+J
LL: LL?
C6 C/)
I l 1' 1 Q
a,fo
I ? ? I
a. w
I i ? I ' I
I' 1
I I co
I I
1 ? ? I I
3/IQ{4 S?lOfJb3?109 ,
w?ai
w
ga ?
O W O
Z W
CC C)
/ M Z 1=
O
O 0
O
O L,J
J
a
U
In
o?z
s?. Z W =
O Jw
s? ?z?o
C7 W5oJo
QJ?xo,
` Z5z ;b
V 5u°o
W,oz
g3a
5w0
Omai
Om<
9NOlS alnVO
r
,? / / I I I ' r r?-r -?
s v rv ? / ? ? I 1 ? ? ? I I ? I rl o f
?...
/ 1 I - a it
Fd QQ 1 --
O°
d?? / a1 W __ fy ? -- I _
it
/ it U r... a z y
LLI
f /U'Oa m
?? 11 ? `a•
1k
'. . C1_'3v
cm
az
ga??
>
00-40
o_
CC in
z
zz
W
>3 a
?05_

NOISN31X9
? r ' 3n1214 s
I ??vd

r.
I
-i_ d3N.se
:
?
. -.1SIX3
I 0
„
II
I =
H
n

I
It !,?
ii ZO

( O
t O
LL w
?
I J
i d
? 1
I J 1
I lD
t
f

1 V
c N

ZUI z„m
Z 9
W

1
O zR?
?
jZ ?N.
' V w z R
LLI? ?q
1 N W 71
OZ5 z $
y gu°o
W' W
iz zlgiu? u?
W
a alw
tq O 0 3 v? v?
Q A tOO ?,N'.m ?', ?
Q O O W r ?
H
F-LLLILLILLLCQ N lAV1NJ
2 RIM, M
0
j
i
HA
I
I

s
ao W
wiz 'LL
g7-a
>Wo
>my)

\
.? HNI ??SOd d'Ydl am' ?

OP 6S?o' ""
/ S

O
sj-
WO
?e ? N
ai
O?? va LL
Oe
Qf- ?.
? I m
I i
HW _

°a S ° o
d m e`x
?:? ii dl
t It

m] N h1-?i Jyj j u
Q I,
3 m 11:

7

0
'ngzz
.T

gY? ?
8
d? I
;
s

?r
' C
O
X19 NNOr _ I o9[
U

'
1
? j

v ai
NN`u?
z
??
zz
Wa__
..;Po._ arse jJ.

M
?IL Z
F
5
0
WZ=
0
0
0
L
L
z p O
0
II
O
J
a
U
to
O
LC)
u
c Z ? 'w
z
^ QZz^"
i+l '^
Q
?lu<
jW? fr?
` C)>z;
v g?°o
IFT?
W
2
= z
3W
O a.
~ O
w J
co >
ao
O
cc
a

o I If ? \?
1
b I

1? l
r ? V I
?s
y'
C14
W C`!
J

Of
O r
Z U
Q rn
a
O
O o a
g W
F LL
W J
J
> LL
F-
v
IL
WNaz
J W
5=?m
0
W~Z=
U)
°
00. 0
0
m
a
0

N
N
OZ O O
L
Q
O w
U
!n
O

u
`- o

Z (' '-11
Q w $m
DWao
- - -
NOISN?IX3 w z "R
U)
I?JVd W €?
?9'c`111,1

_.
_
z? z
V
s

1
? Z
O
1 ,
X0
0 N

P
I
DATA FORM - ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Wetland Delineation Performed by Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project/Site: Governor's Village Date:
Applicant/Owner. Governor's Club County:
Investigator: Bob Zarzecki State:
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site?
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)?
Is the area a potential Problem Area?
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
2/23/2005
Chatham
NC
Yes Community ID:
No Transect ID:
No Plot ID:
Upland
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Andropogon virginicus PNG FAC- 9.
2. Pinus taeda NT FAC 10.
3. Juncus effusus PNEGL FACW+ 11.
4. Rubus spp. NS FACU- 12.
5. Quercus alba NT FACU 13.
6. Acerrubrum NT FAC 14.
7. Carya glabra NT FACU 15.
8. Juniperus virginiana NT FACU- 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-)
25%
Remarks:
'1
.1
HYnaoLonv
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
-Aerial Photographs
-Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: >12 (in.) X Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >12 (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: >12 (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Snll S
Wetland Delineation Performed by Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Creedmoor Sandy Loam Drainage Class: Moderately Well
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aquic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Descriptions:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc,
0-12 10 YR 7/2 7.5 YR 518
Hydric Sal Indicators:
_ Histosol Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
X Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
Low chroma mixed with bright mottles
Wt 1 LANU UtI tKMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YES (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? NO
Hydric Soils Present? NO Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? No
Remarks
Approved by HQUSACE 3/92
DATA FORM - ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Wetland Delineation Performed by Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
ProjectlSite: Governors Village Date: 2/11/2005
ApplicanttOwner. Governors Village County: Chatham
Investigator. Bob ZarzeCki State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Plot ID: Wetland
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VFGFTATIAN
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Juncus effusus PNEGL FACW+ 9. Smilax rotundifolia NWV FAC
2. Nyssa sylvatica NT FAC 10. Ludwigia a/temifolia PNEF OBL
3. Acerrubrum NT FAC 11.
4. Carex spp. PNGL FACW 12.
5. Lonicera japonica FAC- NSWV 13.
6. Rubus spp. NS FACU 14.
7. Salix nigra NT OBL 15.
8. Liriodendron tulipifera NT FAC 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-)
80%
Remarks:
.1
.1
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_Aerial Photographs
_Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
X Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
X Water Marks
X Drift Lines
X Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water. 0 (in.) X Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
X Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
i
snit S
Wetland Delineation Performed by Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wehadkee sift loam Drainage Class: poorly drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaquentic Endoaquepts Confirm Mapped Type? No
Profile Descriptions:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc,
0-6 Al 10 YR 412 Silt loam
6-10 B21g 10 YR 5/1 silty Gay loam
10-12 B22g 10 YR 4/1 fine sandy day loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol X Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_Aquic Moisture Regime X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
X Reducing Conditions ?-Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
Remarks
L
Yes (Circle) (Circle)
Yes
Yes Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes
Approved by HQUSACE 3/92
DATA FORM - ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Wetland Delineation Performed by Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project/Site: Governor's Village - Dosset Tract
Applicant/Owner: Governor's Club
Investigator: Bob Zarzecki / Jessica Regan
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? No
Is the area a potential Problem Area? No
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
Date: 2/23/2005
County: Chatham
State: NC

Community ID: Drained Pond
TransectlD:
Plot ID: Upland

VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Andropogon virginicus HERB FAC- 9.
2. Pinus taeda SAPLING FAC 10.
3. Juncus effusus HERB FACW+ 11.
4. Rubusspp. HERB NI 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAG)
50%
Remarks:
'1
11
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
-Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
-Aerial Photographs
-Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water. >12 (in.) X Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >12 (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: >12 (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SnII S
Wetland Delineation Performed by Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Creedmoor Sandy Loam Drainage Class: Moderately Well
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aquic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Descriptions:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc,
0-12 10 YR 7/2 7.5 YR 5/8
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
SuKdic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
L__
Wt I LAND Ut 1 tKMINA I IUN
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? NO (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? NO
Hydric Soils Present? NO Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? No
Remarks
Approved by HQUSACE 3192
DATA FORM - ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Wetland Delineation Performed by Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project/Site: Governor's Village - Dossett Tract
Applicant/Owner. Governor's Village
Investigator: Bob Zarzecki / Jessica Regan
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? No
Is the area a potential Problem Area? No
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
Community ID:
TransectlD:
Plot ID:
2/23/2005
Chatham
NC II
Drained Pond
Wetland
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Juncus effusus HERB FACW+ 9.
2. 10.
3. 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-)
100%
Remarks:
'1
.1
HvnRnMaY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_Aerial Photographs
_Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
X Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water. >12 (in.) X Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >12 (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: >12 (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed by Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wehadkee silt loam Drainage Class: poorly drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaquentic Endoaquepts Confirm Mapped Type? No
Profile Descriptions:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Mast) Size/Contrast Structure, etc,
0-6 Al 10 YR 412 Silt loam
6-10 B21g 10 YR 5/1 silty clay loam
10-12 B22g 10 YR 411 fine sandy day loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol X Concretions
_Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_
X Reducing Conditions ?-Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Sols Present?
Remarks
Yes (Circle) (Circle)
Yes
Yes Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes
Approved by HQUSACE 3/92
OFFICE USE ONLY: USACE AID#
DWQ
t ?r
1 li r STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEETa
' 1. Applicant's Name: +e r J i 11 a Zr
?-2 2. Evaluator's Name: 13ob z e-c ki
3. Date of Evaluation:- chi .11 t .1 e i 4. Time of Evaluation: 1 12
' S. Name of Stream: 0-k I- G be G. wa,1-
i 6. River Basin: 4 2, r-,-.r
7. Approximate Drainage Area: 40"-5 8. Stream Order: 1 ?-
' 9. Length of Reach Evaluated: -%30 10. County: Gtna? ?•c
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): C: re• ror 's y t {? t , Tyw n h « s
12 Site Coordinates (if known) 35 1 s t~l p i ?? S ` ti l
' 13. Proposed Channel Work (if any): V ?' Q?4 C--"),a-
14.
Recent Weather Conditions: -- ?+u w i.? 4 v nrs . / ily • W) V, 14 5# w e e 1f-
15. Site conditions at time of visit: i,.,sJ4-- .++rr
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 --Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
u ?
-Trout Waters ,Outstanding Resource. Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters ; X Water Supply Watershed _IV (14V)
' 17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES 0 If yes, estimate the water surface area:
I S. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YEST 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? NO
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: % Residential Commercial `% Industrial °l Agricultural
' 10 °/u Forested; ^ °lo Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
21. Bankfull Width: { 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 1 ,
' 23. Channel slope down center of stream L Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight XOccasional Bends `Frequent Meander -Very Sinuous __ Braided Channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, strewn classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring' box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
' there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and ,a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): L4 11 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature .?? Date rx'fi//dS?
This channel evaluation ? tc uten ed to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
' gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of
stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 05i03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
1

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Si'2M
-- _
t I CORI~ 040N POUNI TT C. ANGE ; --
W-IL-.CTERISTIC S -
atilal '
f o''1'lecir?tu?zt ; Ytounfai ,?01{L???
Presence of flow J persistent pools in stream 5 0 - 4 0-5
(uo'flow or saturation O; strong fl
ow, - max lwints) _
2`Evidence of past h?uman'alteration .
1 fl-6 0-S 0-5
-(extensive alteration 0;' no-alteration = max points)
Riparian zone 0-4 - 0-5
3
0 .
? (no buffet = 0; conhprous;,Arde buffer.= max points)
. 3? vid6nce of nutrient or chenticai discharges,.
0?4: 0?4
r _ {extensive discharges 0°no de?4hs ? -- giax oitits)Y _
Groundwater disclhat c
_ Y (no'diseharge 0: sprinfis, seeps, wctlaiil~ +c. -znax t tit) TtJ' ?_ 0 _4 0`4
o Presence of adjacent tloodplain
C) 4 0 -
(no floociplam - 0; extensive Ilo(xlpla n = rnaX P(AWS) 0 - 2
7 Entrenchmentfloodpl?in access
-^ ..
° 3 (cleeplY entrenched ?: fr ctu nt l7oudtr? = n ?x t oirt -- I _ 5 C) 0- 2
Presence of adjacent Retlavds
)`(
(novveilands-O;la>nea?jac ???et'.an?i mss hoii?t,l' ?'? l ?0-2
Channncl sinuosity
y ?<
t f } 4 0-3
i,rxtensivc channeGzation' C;iiatural rncn( mN)
l;w Sediment urput' - ll
`.
lrxtensiyedeposition=.o lit*leorrn'se?iumeirt "znaapoiz?t,) q t
l T Site&tl?versityo[channel bed Fubstatc t -?-
t r1.
(ftue hordoge -4
nous O large?dnerse517es=M011points)
_
1R vidence of channel jnciNidn or widening
r 0 4' 0-4 ° 0-5
?± t 11 (deeply incised - 0; stable bed k- ,tanks iikZ.xcinr l
'j 13 Presence of m ijor batik" 'failures
.? , ? f seveir. erosion ? 0; no ero ion s a??lc b int., - ri ,? hoi?`u) ? _ i_ 't $ ? 0 ? ,?
Roof depth and density on banks
?t 1
F (no visibleroots 0; dense rnoi? rhCun?lio It - 1112X points)
_ q - S .
1 Irnpaet:b} agriculturc or livestock Pruductiou ?
0- 5 -* I 0-4 0_5
t(
(subi6ir tai impact ?i nn e,i1ca c rr,.iX P>mt) -
5(1),, Presence of (nlod?iax points)'
Habitat coinpleOty - - - -- - -
(little or no habitat-0;'-frequent "vanedliahitat, -?? .r lx?int51
q? I R' CanopyCoverage„over streambed
_ (n sbadin 'vegetation ?? -0 comtiruon?cano,) -ns.p r", -? 0-5
Substrateembeddedness ?"? --- -
0 4? 0-4
- - (deePly;embedded 0 Io, e teuCtu,c-nLia)
77 -7
20 Presence of stream invertebrates t.ic pad
r` 1no evidences 0: comzl m, numerous , riLtx quits)
21 Presence ofanrpWbians ---
0 tir U-4 4
O - , tno evidence 0; comnwn uwix ous ty-?c?nia ?.? f?
r• Pxesegee?of fitih -
l 4 4
b 4-
(no evzdence = 0, common, III- e e; t"TC J r;ia P, mt i _-
_
?Z Eviden6e*bf wildlife use
(no evidence 0: abund.uit e iJonce r,LI?L puunts)
total Points PuSsihlei) 1 100 -1L -
TOT. L S( OItF (31ti0c nto. inn dt t, jl a
*These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
4
2
North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream Identification Farm; Version 3.1
Date: "gill /04 Project: :-n r`s V, lIa Latitude: 35 , a 5 1 Sri
Evaluator; Cab urc c Site: Pt I Longitude: 1. u)L HESS
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent County; Other: Y
if z 19 or perennial if 2:30 e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology subtotal - Absent° -Weak bladertite vtrong
1°. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2; 3
2. Sinuosity 0 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence' 0 1 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodpiain 0 1 Mil 1 3.
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1'` 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0' 1 3
9` Natural Levees 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 1 2' 3
11. Grade controls 0 0. 1 1.5
12. Natural valley and draina eway 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No ZQ
t
Yes = 3 -
' Man made dftches are not rated; see discussions in manual \
B. Hydrology Subtotal = )
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or growing season 1 2
16. Leafiitter 1.5 1 0.5' ' 0
17. Sediment on plants - 0 0: 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or plies (Wrack' lines) 0 0.5 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes' 1.
{
' C.,Biology Subtotal. )
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians no 0.5 : 1 c 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 0.5 1.5
28. Iron oxidizing bacteriatfungus. 0 0.5 1.5
29 . Wetland plants instreambed ' FAC = 0.5 FACW = 0.75; OBI = 1.5- SAV . 2.0; Other 0
-2
' Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
Nupwy Ntream taass immuon rorm
' Project Name: ?7?s,t r 1+? s i 1(c River Basin C po. C=ec•-r' County: Gt?t. cam.. Evaluator: &-b e ? CL ec j:
DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: c- w c ee-kL Latitude: 35 . e5iS:?Signature:
Date: ?t 111 (a5 USGS QUAD: Longitude: Jq.t' a4+5-j Location/Di?r
' "LEASE NOTE: fI evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use ofthisform is not necess ? X I e' '14rs
?'• ?i+tc•? ;
if in the bestprofessionaljudgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a mad{f ed natural stream-this
re uigsystem should not be used` '
' W n" Field Lndicators: (Circle One Number Per line)
Absent Weak Mod to Strong
aso h
1) is 7b= A Riffle-&gl ?
2) Is The USDA Texture In StreambM '
4) Is The Channel .
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
7) Are Rw=t Alluvial sits ?
8) Is Item A l >
9) Is °A Continuous Bed & Bank Present?' 0 1 2 3
tl
' (•ROM.. if Bed x Rant Caused Ditch ineAnd WI HOI TSingol(tjl{-_nScore-0
10) Is A Y° Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Mg2 An-&ar L11 Field) Present?
PRIMARY GEoMORPROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:
' 11 H drolory Absent Weak Modente Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flo w/Discha=E=cnt?. 2 -3
PRIMARY HYDROIOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 1
IM t1lolory Absent "I Strons!
1) Am Bby= Roots Present In Strembod? ('21 0
2) Are Rooted Plants f In Surambod? 1 .1 0
4) Are Bivab= Present? 16 1 3
' P)URAR,YBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:
arv kleld IndieatUL(Circk One Number Perl3ne),
ftUMholor, Weak A' Hodg3te Strout
1115? yscut In Channel? 13 2) Is There A ande Conupl Point In Channel? 1.5
Does Topography Indicate A
' 3)
SECOh?IARYGEOMORPROLOGYINDICATORPOINTS. V
' M Hydrolorr Absent Weak Moderutc Strom
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) LAaf uer
11 Is Sedirnem On Plant,, (Or 11,Wsl Present? 0 1.5
3) Are w
' 4) Is Water in Cbarmol And >48 Hal Since 0 .5 1
Last Known Rain? • i t Sre2 And #5 Beloyl*)
5) is 7hete Water in Channel During Ih) o S 1 1.5
Conditions
' 6)6)
Arry m1< P=ent In Sides Of Clmel Qr In Hetocup.??? Ytt No=0
SECONDARYHmBoLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:_J_-5
i '
HL-piolory od Stropt
11 Are 11sh Prmcnt? .5 I'S
2) Am AmRhjbians Presgptj -5 1-5
3) Am AguaticLuIlzi B2=12 - 1.5
dl 115
4 Present?
6) AM Iron Qxidizing Bactediftago Present? 0 13
.7)-Is filamentous AlIme Present? - 0 '5 1.5
8) AreNetland Plats In Streambed? SAY Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly PAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(• NOTE. if To Bence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 .75 .5 0 0
AsNote t?ki p?lNI.ESSSAVPresen «
SPeONDARYBIO NDICATORPOINTS.
./7'AL POINTS (Primary + secondary)= (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
OFFICE USE ONLY.
i i
USACE AID#_
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET `- r
1. Applicant's Name: ? V ar.nu \?i??v 2. Evaluator's Name: ?u t
3. Date of Evaluation: a 105- 4. Time of Evaluation: t> ^^•
5. Name of Stream: c.JT Fu C< 6 cr- - 6. River Basin: Cc. f'c=-r
7. Approximate Drainage Area: 3:9 li ? rc? 8. Stream Order:
9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 14 to O 10. County:
i L. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): Cain a??3 ?? ? t \ Q Jt ,.t1,v? . ? y
12. Site Coordinates (if known)`; ?° S t 5 q t A -+q • off. 4 4,sct t.J
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any): v kt Wt,,, r _ . .
% 14. Recent Weather Conditions:- Ko rt?"s.,... tJt,,
;15. Site conditions at time of visit.---
16, ??- ' ..lam c,Q
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters -)? Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17, Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES ( DOf'yes, estimate the water surface area:
18. Does channel appear on USGS quad.map? YES 0 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? (W NO
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: /o Residential 3') % Commercial Industrial Agricultural
2 % Forested % Cleared/ Logged °J° Other ( )
21. Bankfull Width: 22, Bank Height (from bed to top of bank):
23. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat(0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%)
-Moderate (4 to 10%) -_Steep (>10%)
24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight XOccasionai Bends Frequent Meander Very Sinuous -Braided Channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic vdtbin the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box' and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where'
there arc obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 104, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 3(' Comments:
Evaluator's Signature
rr`'' Date- - r r t r rr j
This channel evaluation ?-ti 1 intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of
stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 05/03. To Continent, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
DWQ #_

t STREAM (QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

c,i ?oRA,e Lm ,Jic ?? - S( (I

- Coast tl 'te"iiriio
Presence of flmNs t pcr„ tc,ll wok ill strc.un i I I
nt . llountall ?a
(no flow or saturation =:0; strong flow -- riL x voiiits), 0-4 0-5
Evidence of past hunian alteration
O ?
(extensive alteration - Oi no alteration mix pvuiis) 0 5
'?
0- 5
J
.
?
. Ili avian zone
P _
'
;
t
?(no buffer 0; contiguous, wide duffer - inax points). O-6 .0-4
_ 0-5
4
-
Evidence of nutrient or chenitcal di<cttarges 0 0-4 (extensive d,scharc,es -Ono dis arge, max points)" ?
Q 4
Groundwater disctiarge ?
."
•?
4 '
0
0-
3
{no,d?scharne - 0; sprinns set p, ?Fetlauds etc : max points) " p 4 1

v Presence of adjacent flo4'd fl rn
4
0 _} 0
0. 2
_
no Iloodplain 0; extensive floods ,?r:. in,: Trotnl)
-
-Entrenchment lhoodlilain .iccrS$ "

- le ? entrenched 0; fre i1 loodii,; max oir ) j C" -, O - 4.
- ?'? 5 ?- ° P its
- .
0 - 2.
Preseceofaiijaeentµctlands fi
r
I
-t 0
-4

r (no wetlands _ 0; large adjacent vv1and fkiir
_
tli
-
- - -
F ? - -

0 2
i
Channchsmuosit?
?;

' 0 5
`(extensive chlimeliza
>, non natural n? jr- aiiati u,i?t?l ? ?:. 0"-4

O."3
-
Sediment input
'

" 4':_
(r 5 0_
extensive deposition- 0 L.tlr r n ) s?dini°ut = max po 0=4
I T Size diversitt of channel bed substrate
©-
`
?
'
_ (fine,`homogenous-0 li cc ditcrscsins- Pi3%p,ift )
1 0 .
S
=
-
Es idenee of cttannei incision or sr uienui
t ,
??
I p incised . ?O stable 0= 4
ld e 1 t?ud 6j, nl k , its)
,- 0 5
{
Presence of tnajgr banl.P fdilurc5_
i
I i
I,
0,--5
(scyerc erosion 0; no erosion stable-banE s ni it t,
iii t )
0-5
1 a . _
Root depth y on flanks t Z
4
0-5
no visiblexoots O; dense toots throu
t",)u? = nix,
?
?
Itnpact`bv agriculture or L?cstoc{ production
'
(subsantral impact O, I)() e4, f uc?r rr.ax p u its) 0-5

] 6 - _ _ __-
Preseti'cc of riffle pooL,rippic-pool toinlilel os '
c
(j toriflleslnpples or.pools +r wel! dcvel, p,d_ it i? j,ui,,), 6
.? -
Habitrat"'oiptoxity
U
f 0
f
o
ab
`
ttic
rnoh
itat O
lrequ?iii pan dbabtat n i?N
potr±?)
C' [[ ?
1b,- -
;' Canopy coverage oscr ?hcauil,ed ?? ?"_• ,
0 ^

... 5
pro shading vegetatioii? 0 coitt,nuo sSarIr,p. -7i 3 poii t l ?j 0-5
w l ' Substrate c ibeddednc-ss
d
t
d
?
0 4
(
eeper embed
ed U; Io e ,,u ii,_ >uzl
-.
'1'rESence otstream inpej iebratcs (s?e
e'4)
pa -
p
?
,
.
no evi tPnce- 0; comnou n, mrious
mix pomt?)
0 5
Presence of ?iniphib,anc ?' -
G?-
t, rl 4:
(no'c: idcncel= O; common, numerc)iIs type - n J.: t s?iit.l
0 --4r
, ? Presenceof6th I,--- ?--
(no evidence= O;.commo niuncr4,u; ( } 4. '
0 4
d
- - - -
F?idenceofrildlife usr
'-
5
t 0-5
't Vtal t oin1S }gym Sl blew

!TC}I't1L ?('()KT: (?1??? fntcnnn?fttst p?,?.e) _ ??j
These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

2

' North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form version 3.1
Latitude: 3 ? . ? ;` f 6S-S +
Date: ? ? k t U4{ Project:
Evaluator. Site: J` e+ Longitude: '4-`t.
Total Points: Other j?
Stream is at Least Intermittent. County: e:g., _Quad Name: V`?-tx' r
ff 2 19 or perennial if z 30
¦ t
t 1
(Subtotal=
A. Georno hol0 Absent Weak Moderate Strong
_
_
Continuous bed and bank
1' 0 1 2 3
.
2. Sinuosity 0 9 2 3
1 In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Sail texture or stream substrate sorting 0 2 3
5, Activelrelic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 t 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 3
9' Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 1
0
5 2
1 3;
1
5
11. Grade controls 0 . .
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existin
0
Yes =3
USGS or NRCS map or other documented No
evidence.
' an-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H 01010 SubtOta -
14. Groundwater flow/discharge'
0
4
2
3
15. Water in channel and> 48 hrs since rain, or 0 3
Water in channel - d or rowin season
5
0
0
16. Leaflitter 1,5 .
17. Sedimenk on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 ? 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximor hic features) present? ` No = 0 Yes .1
¦
t l - ?-? )
C. Biology (SUbtO a -
Fibrous roots in channel
20b
3
2
1
0
.
21°. Rooted plants in channel 3 1 0
22. Crayfish p 0:5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0' 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 0_ 1 1.5
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 1 1.5
29 6. Wetland plants in streambed FAG CW .75 OBL =1.5 SAV - 2.0; Other = 0'
hems 2R and 2l focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or welland p ante.
' Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this forth for additional notes.)
i

ty_ tit btrearn tai ssttt«suutt lilt tai _....
It,oject Name: River Basin: " O'e ' County: C,? Evaluator:
i DWQ Project Number: Neatest Named Stream: C? C Latitude; 3t3. b,Stsv8l Signatwe:
Date: „" t) o? USES QUAD: Longitude:'}tt.6a*4+V Location/Dir ns
' *PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowneragree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use ofthis form is not necessary. a'
(fin the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modifted natural stream-this
rinth g system should not be use d*
' rv F reld Indies#ors: (Circle One Number Per line)
I. eo Mgrpholorv Abpnt Weak- Moderate Strong
1) Ls lb= A Riffle-Ppol ?
2) Is'lhe USDA Texture In S#u bed
i? 2 3
31 Namml v
4 e uu 2
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
pwn 7
4) is A Confimutxu Bed & Bank Present? 4 I 2 3
?(+/?OTE Tf Ard ck Bgnk Caused 13v Ditching And Fl?T'HOUT' Sinuosity Then $?gte-0*I
' Itf) Ls A 2n0 Odder Or Gtrater Channel (As }nditated
Ong Ma?lDt In Field) Plesent7 Y? N --(d?}?
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
It Hydrolory Absent Weak Updemte Strode
' 1) is Therv A Groundwater
Ftow/Dischame prcsent? 0 2 3
M.
P87MAX Y HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POE'4) Are Bivalves PresentZ 3
darn Fieldlndicatm's:(CircleOneNumber PtrLine)
1. Geomorpholoey Absent weak- Modemte
1) Is Ibm A Head Cut Present In Cband'? 0 1.5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY MICATOR POINTS.
IL HuMolff Absent weak Moderate Strew
1) Ls this Year-s (Or Ltst's) Leiflitter
is
1) 1, Seditne", On Plant, (Or Debris) Presentl 1 1.5
3) Arc Wrack Unes rft=t? 0 is
' 4) h Water In Chmdel And >48 Hrs Since 0 1.5
Kn w dramV07F., Mich Inducated In #9 Above iSidy This Step A
S) h Thcre Water In. Channel During Dry 0 S i 1.5
i
Conditions ,
6) Are Hy Ycs 1 S No.4
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:
o Week Moderate sum
1 ?
2) Am a Pitseut?
i 4
51 Arc Mambenthos Present? 0 1.5
11 Am byn t.
7) Is RkMtgus Algae Present? Q 1.1
8) Am Wetland Plants ]a Surambed? SAY Mostly OBL FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UFL
--.` (0 NOTE. If Toud Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 I 75 .$ 0 0
k v k1
SFCOhDARY BIOLOGYINDICAT'OR POINTS.
t dTAL POINTS (Primary + Seconder (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19,Points 'The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)

GOVERNORS VILLAGE
PRIOR PROJECT HISTORY
1
I
DATE ACTION
May 17, 1995 Jurisdictional Determination
October 16, 1995 USACE Memo re: Project Area
April 26, 1996 USACE General Permit Verification
June 8, 1996 DW Approval #I
October 18, 1996 DW Approval #2
December 27, 2004 USACE Notification of Unauthorized Activity
April 29, 2005 Count of Chatham Letter re: Stormwater Pond
Jurisdictional Determination (see attached) - The attached jurisdictional determination
(Action ID 199503160) was issued to the development on May 17, 1995. Also, attached
are sketch maps of the delineation that were attached to the determination.
' USACE Memo re: Project Area (see attached) - On October 16, 1995 Ms. Jean
Manuele wrote a "Memorandum for the Record" stating that the Polk and Dossett Tracts
' (now Governors Village) will be considered separate developments from the Governors
Club subdivision as it pertains to the applicability of Nationwide Permit No. 26. We
have since received verbal confirmation from the USACE that the Governors Village
' development will be considered a separate development from the Governors Club
subdivision.
USACE General Permit Verification (see attached) - On April 26, 1996, the USACE
issued a General Permit Verification for the use of Nationwide Permits 12, 14 & 26 for
impacts to 0.51 acres of waters at the area now know as Governors Village (Action ID
199503160 & 199600078).
DWQ Approval #1 (see attached) - On June 8, 1996, the DWQ issued approval for the
use of General Water Quality Certifications for impacts to 0.51 acres of waters (DWQ
Project No. 96-0362). Impacts maps provided in the original application dated April 10,
1996 are attached.
DWQ Approval #2 (see attached) - On October 18, 1996, the DWQ issued approval for
the use of General Water Quality Certifications for impacts to 3.889 acres of waters
(DWQ Project No. 96-0884). Impacts maps provided in the second application dated
September 5, 1996 are attached.
In a conversation with Todd Tugwelll of the USACE on February 9, 2005, we understand
that the USACE have documentation that the impacts proposed within the second
application dated September 5, 1996 have been approved but there is no copy of the
approval letter in their files. This application was submitted by S&EC. We have
searched our old files, but we have not been able to locate a copy of this letter.
' GOVERNORS VILLAGE
PRIOR PROJECT HISTORY

USACE Letter of Unauthorized Activity / Permit Noncompliance (see attached) -
' The USACE issued a letter of Notification of Unauthorized Activity / Permit
Noncompliance (Action ID 200520149) on December 27, 2004 for this development. In
this letter the USACE notified the owner that the construction of the road across a stream
' was not authorized; that a permit had previously been authorized for impacts in the same
area (AID 199503160); that the permit had expired prior to the construction of the road;
and that the plans have been modified from the originally proposed plans. The remedial
action requested within this letter was for the owner to submit an "after-the-fact"
' individual permit application for the stream impacts caused by the road and for any
additional fills within waters of the US for completion of the proposed project
' (Governors Village).
' County of Chatham Letter re: Stormwater Pond (see attached) - The Chatham
County Planning Director describes in this letter dated April 29, 2005 that the "Village
Pond" was previously approved by the County to meet the County Water Supply
Watershed stormwater requirements for Governors Village.
i
i
i

1
I
U .S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington District
Action ID: V\? d3\`oQ County:
Notification of Jurisdictional Determination

I

1
I

I

I
i
i
I
}
f
t
Property owner/Authorized Agent ?-,O\ I e c- v-. oc (? „te, v e\ n ?n• e ric q:?
Address I,-, . M c ?'.As" 01 ? ?„? ? t tl ' c e ?c e s'\ c\ ?'r ?'i t CSC ?
Telephone Number
?\q`r;t?,
Size and Location of Property(waterbody, Highway name/number, town, etc.)
QO!' cr'r'? .?..: J Pk\t'
, o r v.?. 3 e ct ?u? G
Indicate Which of t following apply c`b c.r e ?4, r ?nec cLa?.a c s A
? o Cab C"c e ??,
There are wetlands on the above described property which we strongly suggest should be delineated and
surveyed. The surveyed wetland lines must be verified by our staff before the Corps will make a final
jurisdictional determination on your property.
• Because of the size of your property and our present workload, our identification and delineation of your
wetlands" cannot be accomplished in a timely manner. You may wish to employ a consultant to obtain a
more timely delineation of the wetlands. Once your consultant has flagged a wetland line on the property,
Corps, staff will review it, and,,if it is accurate, we strongly recommend that you have the line surveyed for
final approval by the Corps. The Corps will not make a final jurisdictional determination on your property
?without an approved survey.
??'' The wetlands on your lot have been delineated, and the limits of Corps jurisdiction have been explained
to you. Unless there is a change in the law or our published `regulations, this determination may be relied
upon for a period not to exceed ears from the date of this notification.
" There are no wetlands present on the above described' property which are subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law
or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed three years
froip the, date of this notification.
• The project is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties. You should contact the nearest State Office of
Coastal Management to determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material in wetlands. on this property withouta Department of the Army
permit is in most cases a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1311). Apermit is
not required for work on the property restricted entirely to existing high ground. If you have any
questions regarding the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please contact
Pnr?. IK ?- :MnR...+P. \- P at Qc°? s qm,- Rik ,` Vic:. apt
Property owner/Authorized Agent Signature;LY ?
Project Manager Signature.''
Date' `Expiration Date d
j
SURVEY FLAT OR FIELD SKETCH OF DESCRIBED PROPERTY AND THE WETLAND
DELINEATION FORM MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE YELLOW (FILE) COPY OF THIS FORM.
CFSAW Fa S"
1 OCrn
17
1
O
?l
1
1 Pt Mo 94
'X
1 lot,
1
1
.. woo<
1
29 ?
uzT
-
pQetAmk vz?
?,-Y_-- r C, M\<,
1
1
1
•
• r I r
r
o
a a

$
0%
r?>
r
?' i
CV

O
1
i
i
i

s '

o
to
m

1-01

Q
Q
c

U

`
N

J
h Z

ON °-? .gt'99C + 3,6t.fLZON a N g3'234?' W
- __--_._ ....... ....., 1o&2d AI-C-V
K 4T
Ad
IL In
memorandum
To: MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD .
CC:
From: Jean B. Manuele
' Date: 'October 16, 1995
Subject: Action ID. 199503160 and199600078, Nationwide Permit
' No. 26 Applicability to Subdivision for Governors Club
Limited Partnership, Polk and Dossett Tracts, South of
Chapel Hill, Chatham County, North Carolina.
On October 16,A995, J contacted Mr. Joe Brinn, Jr. with Governors Club
Limited Partnership to inform him of our decision regarding the applicability of
' Nationwide Permit No, 26 to the proposed development of Polk Tracts I, IJ
and III and the Dossett Tract, owned by the aforementioned partnership. Mr.
Brinn was informed that the developers would be allowed to apply for a
' separate Nationwide Permit No. 26 for the Polk and Dossett Tracts since they,
are located outside of the main Governors Club subdivision development and
will not be entitled to any of the amenities offered within the main
' development. Accordingly, the acreage already issued by nationwide permit in
the main subdivision, 2,4 acres, would not be cumulatively affected by wetland
permits for the Polk and Dossett tracts. Mr oBrinn stated that he had no
problem with this interpretation.
Jean B. Manuel
Regulatory Specialist
' Raleigh Field.,Office
t `
T
i
3 qbg ?IOC'?
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. 199503160 & .:" County 'Chatham
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner/Agent Governors Club Development ATTN Mr William J Brun
Address 10100 Governors Drive
-Ch= el Hill, Nord Carolina 27514
Telephone No. _(419) 986=8500
Size and Location of project (waterway, toad name/number, town, etc.) 223.646 acres west of
S-R. 1727 and east of S.R. 1008. a at miles 1 The site is
located adjacent to and above the headwaters of several unnamed tributaries to Cub Creek
Description of Activity

1
t
0.
i=act totals are as follows: NW No. 12-0.01 acre, NWP No. 14!!0,0? acre and NWP No. 26- i
0.45 acre.
_X-Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC;1344) only.
Section 10 (River and Harbor Act of 1899) only.
Section 404 and Section I0.
12= l4 &U6 Nationwide Permit Number.
Any violation of the conditions of the Regional General or Nationwide Permit referenced above
may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, and/or appropriate legal
action.
This Department of the Army Regional General/Nationwide Permit verification does not relieve
the undersigned permittee'--of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State, or
local-approvals/permits. The permittee may need to contact appropriate State and local agencies
before beginning work
Regulatory Project Manager Signature
Datednn 126. 1996 Expiration D e. January 21. 1997
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORM, ETC., MUST BE
ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
i
t
t -
State of North Carolina
' Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 4 •
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
June 8, 1996
' Chatham County
DEM Project # 960362
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL. CONDITIONS
' W. William Brinn
Governors Club'Dev.
10100 Governors Drive
Chapel Hill, NC 27514
Dear Mr. Brinn:
You have our approval to place fill material in 0.51 acres of wetlands or waters for the purpose of
' residential development, stormwater ponds utilities and roadways at The Polk and Dossett Tracts at
Governors Club Development, as you described in your application dated 10 April 1996. After reviewing
your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification
Numbers 3022, 2732 and 2671. These certifications allow you to use Nationwide, Permit Numbers 12, 14
' and 26 when they are issued by the Corps of Engineers.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you
change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. For this
approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification. Additional
' written DEM approval is needed for the stormwater pond before construction begins. In addition, you
should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a bearing, 'send
' a written petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office
of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask, for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Environmental Management under Section 401
' of the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at.919-733-1786.
Sincerely,
P.tConHowar , r. P.E.
' Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
' Raleigh DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Dorsey
Central Files
960362.itr
' Environmental Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Ad., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
Are Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer - 50% recycledl10% post consumer paper
1
w
d
o a p
n o
to 4
0 CL, u V
a
Q w
Z WZ o Q
<?
dz
z o 3 t-
W W¢ Q Q ?
zv
<0
+?-
v ?
wZ j
d. F- r
Z w s
V
s
I
,. rTQ 4
1 '
z?
a
w
n
n
a
N
LLI
w uj
Q Q
¢ m
o 0
O
!-
XW`
O N Cl)
W `6
[Y_
D!
?M
ROAD
L tALL
' V
DATEt 04 APPIL `O
DESIGN ByY M.P.A.
DP.AWN 6Y- 1,1.j E.5.
1
400 Is
'$0
1
LL,
w
t_ !!
a%? FLU
7 Co
LLJ
1
? ? 1, _ ..,?.,, _ .?, • € _
Jill
11,
I1!
"' ll 11_l
I
II
I
State of North Carolina
' Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 0'
Division of Water Quality
' JamesS. Huns, Jr., Gove mor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
IDE=
A Presto n Howard, Jr., P.E., Directo r
' October 18, 1996
Chatham County
DWQ Project # 960884
' APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Mr. William Brinn
' Governors Club Development
10100 Governors Club
Chapel Hill, NC 27514
I Dear Mr. Brinn:
You have our approval to place fill material in 3.889 acres of wetlands or waters for the purpose of
consrructing a residential and commercial development at Polk, Dossett and Harris Tracts at Governors Club
Development, as you described in your"application dated 5 September 1996. After reviewing your
application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Numbers 3026,
3022, 2665, 2732 and 2671, These certifications allow you to use Nationwide Permit Numbers 3, 12, 13, 14
and 26 when they are issued by the Corps of Engineers,
' This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as
modified below. If you change your project you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new
application. For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification
and any additional conditions listed below. Additional written DWQ approval is required for stormwater
management for the commercial area. The plan shall be submitted before wetland filling occurs. Deed
' restrictions shall be added to all remaining wetlands to prevent future fill,' In addition, you should get any
other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to)
Sediment and Erosion Control, Coastal Stormwatm Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
' You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written
petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of
Administrative Hearings, P.O Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. Ibis certification and its conditi ons
are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing:
' This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act., If you have any questions, please telephone John Domey at 919-733-1786:
S- cerel'
A Preston Howard. Jr. P.E.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
' Corps of Engineers Raleigh Feld Office
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
lkfr. JohnDomey
Central .Files
' Chris Huysman; Soil and Environmental Consultants
960884.1tr
Division of Water Quality • Environmental Sciences Branch
' Environmental Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Greek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/100/6 post consumer paper
1
1
{
PROPOSED MULTI-FAMILY 1 BOUNDRY??a?f;-/ a
NAP ,..?
- .-= a
1 MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING
1
--- - - ?_ - --.-- ;tZ
r__......... - = __ _ _ -_c5iaoa ,?
GNUR1? RD.
MT1
IT iQ
ZI-
1 _ _ ?turs YS" Lr1???ti.i1T1
f2Stf!IS_ RA?t- _
Ob10IIS SSlti•W aat076 -.
R.V6 WNW C" WOOL bIft S
CBn.?? ?? irMCSt W[M OM10S
D A31
1
1
1
?QQ? JNGrv???`
DELINEATED WETLANDS
IN"
1
. _ '
COMMERCIAL NORTH
1 ? .
300' 15ra' 0 300` 600'
?4..r? `
1 I
e i SCALE: 1' = 300'
---- --- - -------
r
t?ci r- a etu weacxrN...

$ VI-LACE
0
0
V
8
M
R tt'
P
A
OLK
RCS-
FORE I PP ?MdL

i. !{A!I[!1/ W?C10?
LJp MlpOt gl91 WM1..
W. MRM ta?.y' M1.. /
?,?
)
??
?
?)??-V'?IYI
VTIMII OOL* (
??
/?
y
?
y
MOM M Ve&g-Vf?NfCW PL M

jai fit6 l a?

v

P?
I
I
covEaNOas C.us
UWITED PARTNERSHI Z$
! 125 /
Z27 26 /
_ j -L_
i
i
i
'.,GOVERNORS CLUB
PROPERTY BDUND.
a j`' . ? ? ? ? a cwWN?L
t ? u
?aoo snantr wnnox
(f.C1 ; 4. tl p
Z/ ? , Zw. RWIM'O YQA M.ICt IE.
` mar/
PROPOSED
LAKE SOUNDAR
t WETT.AN S /
M/F
i.
GOYEWd0i25 CIUS ?
UAIITED PARTNERSHIP `
Loc. ' taw.ws)
a \
' %
36 -W
I
' CENTERLINE Ile .1.1 -it
?? - p.?IG4? Np1.t V. R b
LOT 6 .I.
w oi'ra"90ii ( PROPOSED DAM e
' LOCATION
LOT 5
LOT 4
1MLOM/T? 7 r
LOT 3
n?a.uY. o?oao+¦
' LOT 2
S+xfl 4 ?ox3 ( DATE PEY1S70N Uli11AL
u ?'n m"

-a
-"''4
GOVERNORS NL,A,GE \
PHASE ONE ¢ 'k
TxE.An. Mnn

21 20 r 19 I 16 i
/ 24 23 22. I SITE
1
18 17

'
- t 4MAl
LAKE
oo+ r n""rocRS

MCINITY MAP
(Nat m sccALE)
RNORS CLUB

ERTY BOUNDARY
1
' GENERAL NOTES:

t MY MPIRIN
I 1E
w
1. Kl SWMR A1E FK1tlM

Ms 4- rw

RO FMCNR ms N4E -
AM MP(JK K ii37 AND K OECHNW&S BElbEOF, mo
. SKI O
sax
YMiA K162 ?:
M
,
1 Ax119.IY y ALL
AM BASlT d
COWWOWS NJ.ACE
2. ALL
MAP"= DOW KWOk
W$7n %
o"n D"N
ST10.CCT NORR1 LNESS ORERVKE 110Tfa. OMtggRS VaIACT NtO.ECT
6 00' 00' 2r ZEST OF KC. m MORIK
S TOTAL AX4 p IRACM 34-A 31-0, a 31-C IS K3N:ACRCS.
?. a WAS ME arm" a m C"Nox E GO111tua^ Can a MORN
f 0. PROMTY We$ 8"mm ps-*" AM MOT A ?MT ar 11, ft uar&-Y No
ARE r"co, iROW RE7TRC/OCL 3i#W HDtim
k- R[ MAO" PMrOa OF TRACT i OWlEP BY tl4AtF5 EDMARO NAPJLS k. Nm
8
.. ? 6 MO. 1) AK 1qT AlMOp?rJ/ fde
iTA" 2 OE.Oownm w ST AM uOPS 00 MOT MEET RR R MMUas (x!I *
O
9JppVWON
/ Y-
WW W T AM O 01" In
RCOLtATKr13. su ARE APPRO? rORRErOR0110 nAaoEt OSCr.
/ )'. 9AJ03 1796-00-34-OM
ss9a-w-?«-oooo

/
l REFERENCES:

N?Mp?TA?MI
i. C1 EVJH`T "S u PC
z awNTK W
77 ??Ot )
1K 7 w
wmrr
: . W/ wLNn K W- peoRTav RE-dK1
3
ro
72
CMAR
/
l
t =
1
1a?aov. aus - B.CLt.
P/ATMA4 CPJItn oe. 10a
PC.
4.
00.
OLl6
BgMARYi
6. CMATNAit OP+dr'f fLAT SJK f2 k Mt
4
/ 7. T, PNM.W C"YY P PS s 9 16 7uOE rc 1s-'11s t 211 am: M.tAOE PNA'.i )
FN
-
t
LAGE
IMM C1 IY KAY 2'a (PM N,>
DOOK 32 !G 72
Ci4AiM
? M 0",Y
CMATMAA CdMn PtAr BOOK 32 37 73
nu1M4w cwMrY Pur s10c so-3To
..

MP - 11ET VIM PIPE
I" WE
cm - Eftrm
EJPYA - E?a519M: -CoHor WAY R'fE MCNtMO/t
_
R
Y
/ 0a - 0® BOOK

M/r - MOR OR fouvI.Y
-PAZ
?. F ? CUt1WWE
N

?Q
V
C6
' INIILAL i
M?KIM?CREED
ENONEERS, SURVEYORS, AND PLANNERS
10,35 MT. CARMEL CHURCH RD
CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514
' TEL: t919> 933-9540

GOVERNORS VILLAGE
WETLAND SURVEY MAP
WLLIAMS TWP. CHATHAM COUNTY, NC
DATE: SEPTEMBER 5, 1996 SCALE: I' - 200'
GRAPHIC SCALE.
0 50 104 204: 30
PMCCT tRA - 0278\0003
ORAYN BY - CWR
CHECK BY - JJ3
F.B. - M456-21
OVIO - %EXAND

?H
f ? ?
c
w ?
Q
ro CHAPEL HILL
ZCJ C t -u'
E0. / f
Q COL.
0
1
1 4
o I
1 t ,
t
1 GC `t C M AMC VA 'CaFY cl
1 r DATE. 10 APRIL
%
g DESIGN BY= M.P.A.
Mcl<Jf\4&CRHD
DRAWN BY. M.J.E,S,
ENGINEERS s ARCHITECTS • SURVEYORS..
1
1 _
1 ?
N
1
ll1
Lo o
o g
o Q
1 - - _- - __ , v•, o a
I Q Q ?` ? J lQQ,?

i
f U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington District
0 CEO 9
2
LO' .
Action ID: 200520149 County: Chatham
.
NOTIFICATION OF UNAUTHORIZED ACTIVITY / PERMIT NONCOMPLIANCE
Responsible Authorized
Party Governors Club Development Corp. Agent Mr. Sean Clark
Attn: Dane Vincent Soil & Environmental Consultants Inc.
Address Post Office Box X Address 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Hot Springs; VA 24445 Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number Telephone Number 919-876-8441 "
Size and Location of Property (waterbody, Highway name/number, town, etc,): The property is,
located adjacent to the Governors Village Town home site, east of Mt. Carmel Church Road, north of Old
' Farrington Road, southeast of Chapel Hill, Chatham County, North.Carolina. The site contains wetlands
and unnamed tributaries to Cub Creek, in the Cape Fear River Basin.
Description of Unauthorized Activity 1 Permit Noncompliance: Construction of a road across a stream
and wetland system, without, permit authorization. A pennit had previously been authorized for impacts
in the same area (AID 199503160), however the permit had expired prior to construction of the road way,
' and the plans have been modified from the originally proposed plans. Construction of the road has
resulted in the loss of an undetermined length of stream channel. Previous impacts associated with the
subdivision. currently exceed 0.5 acres, which is the limit for nationwide permit authorization. Additional
impacts, including the unauthorized road construction will require individual permit authorization.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
X Unauthorized Activity River and Harbor Act, Section 10 (33 USC 443)
Noncompliance with Permit X Clean Water Act, Section 301 (33 USC 1311)
Unless you Piave a Department of the Army Permit for the above-described acfivity, it is a violation of federal law
as specified above. You have agreed to do no further work in waters or wetlands without the required Department
of the Army Permit. Any further unauthorized work in waters or wetlands will be considered an intentional
violation of federal law. If you do no, further work in waters and wetlands," and perform the remedial action
requested below, the Corps of Engineers will take no further action in this matter. If you continue to
' work in waters and wetlands without the required authorization, and/or fail to perform the requested.
remedial action, the. Corps will take further administrative action, and-may request the U.S. Attorney to
file suit against you. If you need further information about the Corps of Engineers regulatory program,
please contact Todd TugwelI at telephone number (919) 876 -8441 extension 26
b
Y

Action ID: 200520149 'County: Chatham
' Remedial Action Requested: As indicated during the site meeting of December 20, 2004 with Mr. Joe
Faulkner of CE Group, Inc. and Mr. Sean Clary with Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc., submittal of
' an after-the-fact individual permit application (enclosed) is required. In addition to applying for existing
impacts associated with the road crossing, the application should include all additional fills within waters
of the U.S. required for completion of the proposed project. Existing streams and wetlands within the
project area must be delineated and surveyed to accurately determine the proposed impact. A plan to
f mitigate for all unavoidable impacts must also be included with your permit application. Alternatively,
should you choose not to apply for after-the-fact permit authorization, you must submit a plan to restore
all impacted wetlands and stream channels on the project site. Your application or restoration plan should
' be submitted to the Raleigh Field Office no later than February 4, 2005. Please contact me if additional
time is require for preparation of the application materials.
Your signature acknowledges receipt of this notification. Return a signed copy of this notification to
the Raleigh Regulatory Field Office In the enclosed pre-addressed envelope.
Property Owner /Responsible Party Signature
Regulatory Project Manager Signature
Date December 27, 2004
WETLAND DELINEATION FORM MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM.
Enclosure
Copy Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. Joe Faulkner
CE Group, Inc.
' 1051 Pemberton Hill Road
{
Suite 201
Apex, NC 27502
r
f_
t '
1

04/29/05 FRI 19:41 FAX
[a 001
COUI`IW OF CHATHAM
PLANNING DEPARTMENT PIIONw 919-542-8204
'POST OFFICE BOX 54 r'nx 919 -542-0527
PiTTSBORO,N. C.27312-0054 cmait: Yoith.nttgSinson?gcmait.ntr
ORGANIZED 1770 707 SOUARF MILES.
April 29, 2005
Governors Village Commercial LLC
Attn: Dane Vincent
PO BoxX
Hot Springs, VA, 24445
RE: Governors Village Pond
Dear Mr. Vincent:
Recently the County Board of Commissioners roved th ed Unit Development
Modification for Governors Village Commercial LLC. The approval provides for the
expansion of the PUD to include 18.95 additional acres east of the existing Governors
Village Pond. You will be developing this area as 49 single,family home sites. The area
west of the existing pond was previously approved for development as office' buildings
' and associated parldng. This recent PUD modification approval allows for the
development of 76 town homes in place of the office development.
The existing Village Pond was previously approved by the County to meet the County
I Water Supply Watershed stocmwater requirements for Governors Village." Prior to
submission of preliminary and final plat for the proposed town homes and new single
family area, you will be required to show that the existing pond can accommodate any
I change in impervious area or make modifications to the pond!in order to comply with our
ordinance.
Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
2«
Keith Megginson, Planning Director
Post-it' Fax Note 7671 Dat?/-9 OY' t"°es? '''
..,.-
C01QaPt
Phone If Phone
546.A -f~ao s"
Fax N Fez 4, 5-V
J - O S ? jy
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
MITIGATION PLAN
The applicant does not believe that on site mitigation is practicable beyond avoidance to
any additional wetlands, streams and buffers. As such, the applicant proposes to make a
payment into the Wetlands Restoration Fund administered by the North Carolina
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). The applicant has not yet formally
requested the acceptance for this payment from NCEEP. This request will be submitted
as soon as the agencies have verified that the impacts listed within this application are
correct, have provided guidance on the feasibility of these impacts being approved, have
agreed upon the appropriate mitigation ratios, the applicant is both willing and able to
make such payment, and NCEEP accepts the requested payment. If in the case that the
applicant is neither willing nor able to make this payment once determined by the
agencies or NCEEP is not willing to accept the payment, then the applicant will propose
an alternative mitigation plan.
At this time the applicant proposes to mitigate through payment into the Wetlands
Restoration Fund for all permanent wetland impacts (0.365 acres). At this time the
applicant is proposing a 1:1 mitigation ratio for these impacts. No mitigation for impacts
to open waters and other waters is proposed.
The previously approved delineation did not indicate a stream within the location of the
road crossing depicted on Impact Map #2 and no stream mitigation was required at that
time. We understand that 15` order, headwater streams were not always depicted on
delineation maps in 1996 because the agencies did not account for impacts in stream
length. However, given that the impacts have already occurred and that we have no
documentation of a stream existing within this drainage prior to the impacts occurring it
is not clear if a stream ever existed within this location let along the type or quality of
stream if one did exist. Also, the DWQ does not require stream mitigation for permanent
stream impacts less than 150 feet. Other than the avoidance of additional permanent
impacts to streams (including those within areas previously approved for impacts), the
applicant does not propose any additional mitigation for the 148 feet of permanent,
perennial stream impacts. If this is not acceptable to the USACE, then the applicant
proposes payment into the Wetlands Restoration Fund (as described above) for any
required stream mitigation. Based on the quality (see Stream Forms) of the stream reach
upstream from the crossing the applicant does not believe that a mitigation ratio greater
than 1:1 should be required if the USACE requires mitigation.
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 148 (if required)
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.365
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
PUBLIC INTEREST ISSUES
In a document provided by the U.S. Corps of Engineers titled "Wetlands & Corps
Wetland Regulations" and dated August 13, 2001, the Corps of Engineers lists 21
specific factors that will be reviewed related to Public Interest. These factors are similar
to the "Evaluation Factors" listed on Page 8 of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Regulatory Program, Application Information document dated May 1985. These items
are as follows:
Conservation Safety Economics
Water Quality Aesthetics Fish & Wildlife Values
Wetlands Historic Properties Shore Erosion and Accretion
Flood Hazard Water Supply Food & Fiber Production
Floodplain Value Navigation Environmental Concerns
Land Use Energy Needs Property Ownership
Recreation Mineral Needs Needs and Welfare of the People
Responses to each of the 21 Public Interest Issues are presented below.
Conservation:
No additional impacts are proposed to the remaining wetlands, streams and riparian
buffers on the site beyond those that have already occurred or those proposed within this
' new application.
Water Quality:
What is commonly referred is as "Village Pond" located in Governors Village is actually
a large stormwater management pond required by Chatham County to meet the County
Water Supply Watershed stormwater requirements to control stormwater runoff from
Governors Village (see the April 29, 2005 letter from Keith Megginson, Chatham County
Planning Director attached to the Prior Project History section of this application). As
such, the applicant believes that this pond will be sufficient to meet the DWQ Water
Quality Certification requirements (15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(5)) for the protection of
downstream water quality standards through the use of onsite stormwater control
measures.
' The construction will meet all of the local, State and Federal design requirements with
regards to protection of water quality. The surface waters on site are classified by the
' DWQ as "WS-IV, NSW". The development will comply with all DWQ water quality
standards for class "WS-IV, NSW" waters.
' Wetlands:
No additional impacts are proposed to the remaining wetlands on the site beyond those
that have already occurred or those proposed within this new application. Wetland
functions will therefore be retained within these areas.
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
PUBLIC INTEREST ISSUES
The applicant proposes to avoid additional impacts to wetland areas that were previously
approved for impacts in 1996 as described within this application and the Wetland Impact
Maps. Also, additional wetlands and waters beyond those previously determined to be
jurisdictional in 1996 exist on the site today. These areas will be avoided as depicted on
the Wetland Impact Maps.
Flood Hazard:
The project site is located outside of the 100-year floodplain and only has approximately
an 80-acre watershed above the stormwater pond therefore flooding is not of concern.
The culverts below the proposed road / driveway crossings have been reviewed and
approved by the local municipality to ensure the proper passage of any high water events.
Floodplain Value:
The site is located outside the 100-year floodplain, therefore there are no impacts to any
existing FEMA designated floodplain areas. No significant flood plains exist along the
headwater stream systems located on the project site.
Land Use:
The proposed development is currently being or has already been developed as a mixed-
use commercial and residential community. The surrounding properties are primarily
residential with some commercial and vacant woodland.
Recreation:
No existing public or private recreational facilities will be negatively affected by the
development and operation of the facility. Governors Village property owners will be
able to enjoy the recreational activities within the community, including but not limited
the walking trails around the "Village Pond".
Safety:
All entrances to the development along state roads have already or will meet the
standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT). In addition to
the NCDOT constraints imposed for the sake of safety, there are also constraints on the
construction process by state law and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
Aesthetics:
The applicant does not believe that Governors Village will negatively the affect aesthetics
' of the surrounding properties and many people may feel that this well landscaped
community including the large "Village Pond" enhances the aesthetics of the area.
' GOVERNORS VILLAGE
PUBLIC INTEREST ISSUES
' Historic Properties:
The State Historic Preservation Office, North Carolina Listings in the National Register
of Historic Places by County document provided on their web site (see
' http://www.hpo.dcr.state.nc.us/nrlist.htm) does not list any historic places within the
property boundaries. The State Historic Preservation Office has been contacted and a
copy of their February 22, 2005 response letter is attached. In it they state that they are
' aware of no historic resources that would be affected by the project.
Water Supply:
The site is located within the Jordan Lake water supply watershed. Chatham County has
reviewed the development under their water supply ordinances. The development will
comply with all local water supply ordinances as required and approved by the DWQ.
The development will comply with all surface water standards for "WS-IV NSW ' waters.
"Village Pond" was required by the County to control stormwater runoff from the
Governors Village as described in the April 29, 2005 letter from Keith Megginson,
Chatham County Planning Director attached to the Prior Project History section of this
application. The applicant does not believe that development of the site and the resulting
water needs will adversely affect any existing off-site water supplies.
Navigation:
' The wetlands and waters proposed to receive fill materials are not located in navigable
waters. No impacts to navigation are anticipated as a result of site development.
1 Energy Needs:
Electrical energy for the development will be supplied by the local network as operated
' by Progress Energy. The development will not generate any of its own power and will
not have energy needs in excess of normal residential development.
' Mineral Needs:
Neither supply nor demand for mineral resources will be negatively affected by the
development of this site.

Economics:
' The applicant does not believe that the development will have a negative affect on the
economy of the surrounding community. In fact, the new residences and businesses will
provide new property taxes and spark retail and service related businesses within the
' nearby communities.
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
PUBLIC INTEREST ISSUES
Fish & Wildlife Values:
'
The following species have been federally listed as Threatened or Endangered for
Chatham County:
I Common Name Scientific Name Status
Bald Eagle Halieetus leucocephalus Threatened
Red-cockaded woodpecker Picoides horealis Endangered
'
Cape Fear Shiner Notropis mekistocholas Endangered
Harperella Ptilimnium nodosum Endangered
I Of these, the Bald Eagle is the only federally listed Threatened or Endangered species
listed on the Farrington, NC USGS topographic quadrangle.
' Utilizing the N.C. Natural Heritage Program (NHP) database of all recorded protected
species occurrences, S&EC found that there are no federally listed species occurring
onsite. However, within a three-mile radius of the site, five occurrences of the Bald
' Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), as recently as 2003 have been recorded. These
occurrences are shown on the attached map. It is not expected that activities at the
subject property will have a detrimental effect on the Bald Eagle population.
I No direct or secondary adverse impacts to federally listed species are expected from the
construction of the proposed subdivision.
' Village Pond located on the property and retained stream, wetland and riparian corridors
are anticipated to provide habitat and wildlife corridors both within and through the
community.
I
Shore Erosion & Accretion:
I This public interest issue is not applicable to this application as the development will not
affect shore erosion or accretion.
' Food & Fiber Production:
The development will produce neither food nor fiber as part of the facility operations.
Environmental Concerns:
Noise
' No adverse impacts to noise levels in the area are anticipated from the development of
this site.
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
PUBLIC INTEREST ISSUES
Prevention of Contamination
All construction activities and resulting infrastructure will be in compliance with
applicable environmental laws. No facilities are planned that have a significant risk for
production or release of environmental contaminants.
Erosion and Sedimentation
Construction at the site will be performed under an approved Erosion and Sedimentation
Control Plan to minimize sedimentation and erosion in the construction areas.
Stormwater during construction will be managed using sedimentation basins and other
control devises that will reduce the sediment load in runoff and will attenuate peak flow
rates to prevent downstream erosion.
Air Quality
I No adverse impacts to local air quality are anticipated as a result of this development.
' Property Ownership:
The applicant currently owns the portions of the development where impacts to waters
' are proposed. Many of the properties within the remainder of the development have been
sold and currently have multiple different property owners. Adjacent property owners to
Governors Village are listed in Block 24.
I Needs and Welfare of the People:
The applicant believes that the completion of this development will go towards meeting
' the increasing needs of housing and services for the future residents of this community
and Chatham County and will in turn enhance the welfare of the people of this
community and it's future residents.
sW4
4
?1' S
? 3: R? ?V,l ?`+-.4 Z.L- 'r ! N? ??L? - ~?? ?? •; ?_ 1 ? ail
y " 4i1?, I?1?w'?['? ;?_• S-??? ? s, rT ?, +Y w i `? 1 ! ? ? :J?j{ r ? ? f I r ? 1 +h'?"/`?? ? I ?- `?
411 1
`? ? (?` ? ? r ' r - ,-a ,yam ?. A - .! ? n?:.___?I?rk.+'?F'CO?'
'ok
%
A'i
r
jr.
73 ? C
s yy >
1? A"
L°?1,' '?`??'u,33 ,•'y>
"X, 7
,.'
1, 2-
101
- C -
?? ? c.GU RRE'M G? OF ?3Ac.D E AtoUES
N
PrO) O: scale: Figure 7 - USGS
41 M1.VY2 > +•:' Farrington Quad
P ,)w oalt: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
LW.: SC 01.2x 5 11010 Raven Ridge Rd- Raleigh, NC 27614
Governoes Village (919) 846.M • [phone]
Chatham. County, NC,
..Web Page:.... www.SandEC.com
Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
1 Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
1 Attach this card to the back of the maiipiece,
or on the front if space permits.
Article Addressed to:
Mr. Mark AshnesS,PE
CE Group Inc.
1051 Pemberton Hill Road Suite 201
Apex,NC 27502
DWQ# 05-0810 Chatham
A. Sign ure?
X ? Agent
Addresse(
Re ei (Prinfed Marne) C. Dat liver)
D. Is delivery address different from Item 11 ? Yes
If YES, enter delivery addr?ssbelow ? No
3. ice Type '•
Certified mail ? Exp 1d{Ir
Registered Retu Re, Ipt for Merchandise
O'Insured Mail 13 C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ? Yes
Article Number 7005 1160 0000 9954 9 710
(Tiansfer from service I
c G.,_ RRi 1 Gotin ?... onnd n era oe., , oe a ,. 4
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE

• Sender. Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
40.1 Oversight/Express Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
First-Class Mail
Postage 8? Fees Paid
USPS
Permit No. G-10
¦ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
¦ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
Article Addressed to:
A.
X
0 Agent
B. Tjlved by (Printed Name) I C. Date of Deliven,
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? 0 Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: 0 No
Mr. Mark Ashness,P.E.
CE Group Inc.
1051 Pemberton Hill Road Suite 201
Apex,NC 27502
DWQ# 05-0810-Chatham
3. Se ice Type
Certified Mail 0 Express Mail
Registered Return Receipt for Merchandise
? Insured Mail 0 C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes
>.. Article Number ?005 1160 0000 9954 8 7 51
(Transfer from service /abed
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
LISPS
• Sender. Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight/Express Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
First-Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
Permit No. G-10
rr.
NC Division of Water Quality
Tran # Invoice Type Date Reference
6793 0509052 Invoice 05/09/05 9325.W1
050810
017564
Check Number: 17564
Date: 05/09/05 Check Amt: $475.00
Balance Discount Pay Amount
$475.00 $0.00 $475.00
W
MAY .9
WERMO AND gTORMWATM9RAM
10
mor- z
Q
4-
Z
0
?w
?z
?Q
z
w w
-sop
M
r
Co
D
3
,v

v -
G
a
U_

q
J
V
s
?c-
r
Y
r
v

I ?011
llli? I?
v?

-_ ?" l l l l 1 l I l l
ll 11 ll
ll i
1u
? r
Z
I
1Y
?llll..llllt\RT
?l 1 ? 1
l11
0 11l ?1
L
0
4
1.

ff ?\
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources •
Division of Water Quality A&4
JJamesB. Hunt, J r.,
1-b Governor ED EH N F?
Jonathan B B. . Howe es, Secrets ry
A. Presto n Howard, Jr., P.E., Di recto r
October 18, 1996
Chatham County
DWQ Project # 960884
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Mr. William Brinn
Governors Club Development
10100 Governors Club
Chapel Hill, NC 27514
Dear Mr. Brinn:
You have our approval to place fill material in 3.889 acres of wetlands or waters for the purpose of
constructing a residential and commercial development at Polk, Dossett and Harris Tracts at Governors Club
Development, as you described in your application dated 5 September 1996. After reviewing your
application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Numbers 3026,
3022, 2665, 2732 and 2671. These certifications allow you to use Nationwide Permit Numbers 3, 12, 13, 14
and 26 when they are issued by the Corps of Engineers.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as
modified below. If you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new
application. For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification
and any additional conditions listed below. Additional written DWQ approval is required for stormwater
management for the commercial area. The plan shall be submitted before wetland filling occurs. Deed
restrictions shall be added to all remaining wetlands to prevent future fill. In addition, you should get any
other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to)
Sediment and Erosion Control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written
petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of
Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions
are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Domey at 919-733-1786.
S' cerel
?I
A. Preston Howard, lr. P.E.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Feld Office
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
john Dorney
Central Files
Chris Huysman; Soil and Environmental Consultants
960884.1tr
Division of Water Quality • Environmental Sciences Branch
Environmental Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper

v
---
f
DELINEATED WETLANDS
SCALE: I" = 300'
600'
r?
N/F
GOVERNORS CLUB
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - 28
($a X6. 00. a)
25 24
27 ? 26
i
N/F
GOVERNORS CLUB
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
LOT 6
IXc:
o?i ze w?`s+a+"
LOT 5
N
T. k
OB- fN PC 067 ?-
1lELW ?W0041X

1

\ PROPOSED I
LAKE BOUNDARY
WETLANDS 10
`(AREA - O.ma Ac.)
i
Z LOT 4
/
I
I
s
LOT 3
TE111AA
GOOOMN
W A24 Ri 66]
LOT 2
N/T
SM G 80005
06 47 .]5 n
00 525 PG m
661 ?

?I
STREAM
/ CENTERU NE
1 PROPOSED DAM
LOCATION
LOT 7
.IF
ors N e
'A Y. WICRIA 1Q1
oe rn rc 027

' a c HANNGL
GOVERNORS CLUB
PROPERTY BOUND,
.'N
TWO MtENTLCY xORTOx
<aACr a ia. q ,)
o6aroxa
mewa NSA - IaX# At
coau,m wo, .ss. Xn ,)

.F
KFl i i IDQ1 xAM6

40
/ /
/ '000,//.
j
CHARLES EDWARD HARM
(xus7 ,. ra. q ,)
a sax;
,m.w,Xr ucA . xn...c
101*1 loe
100,? g
/ /
/ /
/ i
1000,
v
DATE REVISION INIIIAL
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
PHASE ONE
(SEE REF Ha 7)
l 16 1
24 23 11 22 21 20 19
; 1811
17

JORDA
LAKE
RNORS CLUB /
ERTY BOUNDARY /
NTL /
NTLEY NEKTON
E AP. 111 1)
HKA1
YlCA ? 10.152 AG
1m. 4.1iO 1)
/y
r
?y
'GL
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
GENERAL NOTES;
t. ALL DIENS311S SHONN HEREON ARE HORRONTAL OWM YEASUREMEIR
NO APPEAR III FAT ND OEOMNS THEREOF, NO GRID FACTOR LAS BEEN
APPLIED.
2 ALL BEARINGS SH10Mi HEREON ARE BASED ON GOVERNORS VLLADE
PROJECT NORTH UNLESS OTERWSE NOTED. GOVERNORS ADAGE PROJECT
5 00' OO' 23' NEST OF KG GRID NORTH.
3. TOTAL AREA OF RACTS 31-A 31-8, t 31-C IS HL316 ACRES
IL AREAS IRE OEi CANED BY OOORDNATE 00 PUTAIIOK COMM AS NOTED.
S. PROPERTY LINES SHOWN DASHED ARE NOT A PART OF THIS SURVEY AND
ARE rA E N FROM REFERENCES SHOWN HEREON.
6. THE REMAINING PORTIONS OF TRACT 1 OWNED BY CHARLES EDWARD HARRIS. k. AND
TRACT 2 OWNED 6Y KOLU LE101 HA S (SEE REF..0 1) ARE NOT APPROVED FOR
BULDINC OEVELOPMEHT AND 00 NOT MEET THE REOURDHEN'S OF THE S03DPASION
REGULATIONS, BUT ARE APPROVED FOR RECORDNO PURPOSES ONLY.
7. PJ.K'S 9796-00-33-0000
9796-00-34-0000
REFERENCES:
1. CNAIV" COUNTY PS 23 PG 99 (HORTON)
2 CHATHAM COUNTY PS 7 PG 77 (COOK)
3. CHATHAM COUNTY PS 87 PG 72 (MORTON RE-q V.)
4. CHATHAM GOUTY D& 606 PG. 66 (OOv. CLUB - G.C.LP.)
S. CHATHAM COUNTY PLAT SUDS 92-440 k 441 GO V. CLUB BOUHOARI?
6. CHATHAM COUNTY PLAT S1JOE 96-216 k 219 GOV. VTI.L?DE PHASE E)
7. CHATHAM COUNTY PS 96 PG 216 (GOV. ALA PH-1)
CHATHAM COUNTY PUT BOOK 32 PG. 72
CHATHAM COUNTY PLAr a" 32 PG 73
CHATHAM COUNTY PLAr SUCE 66-370
LEGEND:
NP -
Ep - DOSTNO IRON PIPE
EW - EXISTING CONCRETE MCNDNENT
R - RIGHT-OF-WAY
- D® BOON
M. - PAGE
N/F - NOW OR FORMEU6_Y
rt - 0ENTTRUHE
N
Y?
GRAPHIC SCALE
T%iiiiii
0 SO 100 200 30'

MCKIM&CREED GOVERNORS VILLAGE PROJECT NO. - 0276,0063

ENGINEERS. SURVEYORS, AND PLANNERS WETLAND SURVEY MAP C
DRAWN HECK BY _ JJ
CHECK BY - JJJ
1035 MT. CARMEL CHURCH RD. F.B. - W458-21
CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 Y LLIAMS TWP. CHATHAM COUNTY, NC oWO - WETUAO
TEL: <919> 933-9540 DATE: SEPTEMBER 5, 1996 SCALE: 1" = 200'

TO G4APEL 1411-L
C
0
z
O
0-

-? R(o
z O
J
?a
QQ Q
Q cn
-? N
(? N
co
Lu?
3 U
O ??
T
L2
?T
Q a?
D- -?
o? r
LLA
CL r
I
LU
c r
4 r
I
r I
o
0
0
n
HE, ". I
CJ
c.c?P?t t M ?zcN CON &
--->
i
-REED ci< TA& C DATE: 10 APRIL 96
DESIGN BY: N.P.A.
DRAWN BY: N.J.E,S.
ENGINEERS * ARCHITECTS • SURVEYORS
0
z
O
(L
2?
z0
? J
L
w ?Q
p
U l?
4
O
OW
O ca =
T

P
< d J
W J W
a 0Z
W Q
I
1
? o 0
I

w
w
V
Q Q
m 4
Lf? o
n ?
W is
QLU
Q
? U
3 H
QQ
O O

Gal{ o, t%At\- rctH copy 1
RIL q6
P.A.
FIGURE 3
DE\'ELOPf" LENT
PLAN
300' 150' 0 300' 600'
?M?
SCALE: I" = 300'
C.

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington District
Action ID: 200520149 County: Chatham
NOTIFICATION OF UNAUTHORIZED ACTIVITY / PERMIT NONCOMPLIANCE
Responsible
Party Governors Club Development Corp.
Attn: Dane Vincent
Address Post Office Box X
Hot Springs, VA 24445
Telephone Number
Authorized
Agent Mr. Sean Clark
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Address 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number 919-876-8441
Size and Location of Property (waterbody, Highway name/number, town, etc.): The property is
located adjacent to the Governors Village Town home site, east of Mt. Carmel Church Road, north of Old
Farrington Road, southeast of Chapel Hill, Chatham County, North Carolina. The site contains wetlands
and unnamed tributaries to Cub Creek, in the Cape Fear River Basin.
Description of Unauthorized Activity / Permit Noncompliance: Construction of a road across a stream
and wetland system, without permit authorization. A permit had previously been authorized for impacts
in the same area (AID 199503160), however the permit had expired prior to construction of the road way,
and the plans have been modified from the originally proposed plans. Construction of the road has
resulted in the loss of an undetermined length of stream channel. Previous impacts associated with the
subdivision currently exceed 0.5 acres, which is the limit for nationwide permit authorization. Additional
impacts, including the unauthorized road construction will require individual permit authorization.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
X Unauthorized Activity River and Harbor Act, Section 10 (33 USC 403)
Noncompliance with Permit X Clean Water Act, Section 301 (33 USC 1311)
Unless you tave a Department of the Army Permit for the above-described activity, it is a violation of federal law
as specified above. You have agreed to do no further work in waters or wetlands without the required Department
of the Army Permit. Any further unauthorized work in waters or wetlands will be considered an intentional
violation of federal law. If you do no further work in waters and wetlands, and perform the remedial action
requested below, the Corps of Engineers will take no further action in this matter. If you continue to
work in waters and wetlands without the required authorization, and/or fail to perform the requested
remedial action, the Corps will take further administrative action, and.may request the U.S. Attorney to
file suit against you. If you need further information about the Corps of Engineers regulatory program,
please contact Todd Tugwell at telephone number (919) 876 - 8441 extension 26
?. s
Action ID: 200520149 County: Chatham
Remedial Action Requested: As indicated during the site meeting of December 20, 2004 with Mr. Joe
Faulkner of CE Group, Inc. and Mr. Sean Clark with Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc., submittal of
an after-the-fact individual permit application (enclosed) is required. In addition to applying for existing
impacts associated with the road crossing, the application should include all additional fills within waters
of the U.S. required for completion of the proposed project. Existing streams and wetlands within the
project area must be delineated and surveyed to accurately determine the proposed impact. A plan to
mitigate for all unavoidable impacts must also be included with your permit application. Alternatively,
should you choose not to apply for after-the-fact permit authorization, you must submit a plan to restore
all impacted wetlands and stream channels on the project site. Your application or restoration plan should
be submitted to the Raleigh Field Office no later than February 4, 2005. Please contact me if additional
time is require for preparation of the application materials.
Your signature acknowledges receipt of this notification. Return a signed copy of this notification to
the Raleigh Regulatory Field Office in the enclosed pre-addressed envelope.
Property Owner / Responsible Party
Regulatory Project Manager Sign

Date December 27. 2004
WETLAND DELINEATION FORM MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM.
Enclosure
Copy Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. Joe Faulkner
CE Group, Inc.
1051 Pemberton Hill Road
Suite 201
Apex, NC 27502
04/29/05 FRI 13:41 FAX
COUNTY OF CHATHAM
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE BOX 54
PTTTSBORO, N. C. 27312-0054
ORGANIZED 1770 707 SOLJARP MALES
April 29, 2005
Governors Village Commercial LLC
Attn: Dane Vincent
PO Box X
Hot Springs, VA, 24445
RE: Governors Village Pond
Dear Mr. Vincent:
2001
PnONE: 919-542-8204
FAX: [phone]
tntell: keith.nlegginsonLpemail.nCI
Recently the County Board of Commissioners approved the Planned Unit Development
Modification for Governors Village Commercial LLC. The approval provides for the
expansion of the PUD to include 18.95 additional acres east of the existing Governors
Village Pond. You will be developing this area as 49 single family home sites. The area
west of the existing pond was previously approved for development as office buildings
and associated parking. This recent PUD modification approval allows for the
development of 76 town homes in place of the office development.
The existing Village Pond was previously approved by the County to meet the County
Water Supply Watershed stornlwater requirements for Governors Village. Prior to
submission of preliminary and final plat for the proposed town homes and new single
family area, you will be required to show that the existing pond can accommodate any
change in impervious area or make modifications to the pond in order to comply with our
order,< ::,d.
Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions.
Since
ely,
r
Keith Megginson, Planning Director
Post-ie Fax Note 7671 oath, y_o ? Pages 1. g"
To FPOm
Co./Dept. ^ C
L Co. f / ,S
C
Phone ft ? _ F.2 o
..... .57(/
Fax 11 O /J / Fax # ?? - l7 S
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
MITIGATION PLAN
The applicant does not believe that on site mitigation is practicable beyond avoidance to
any additional wetlands, streams and buffers. As such, the applicant proposes to make a
payment into the Wetlands Restoration Fund administered by the North Carolina
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). The applicant has not yet formally
requested the acceptance for this payment from NCEEP. This request will be submitted
as soon as the agencies have verified that the impacts listed within this application are
correct, have provided guidance on the feasibility of these impacts being approved, have
agreed upon the appropriate mitigation ratios, the applicant is both willing and able to
make such payment, and NCEEP accepts the requested payment. If in the case that the
applicant is neither willing nor able to make this payment once determined by the
agencies or NCEEP is not willing to accept the payment, then the applicant will propose
an alternative mitigation plan.
At this time the applicant proposes to mitigate through payment into the Wetlands
Restoration Fund for all permanent wetland impacts (4.365 acres). At this time the
applicant is proposing a 1:1 mitigation ratio for these impacts. No mitigation for impacts
to open waters and other waters is proposed.
The previously approved delineation did not indicate a stream within the location of the
road crossing depicted on Impact Map #2 and no stream mitigation was required at that
time. We understand that 1" order, headwater streams were not always depicted on
delineation maps in 1996 because the agencies did not account for impacts in stream
length. However, given that the impacts have already occurred and that we have no
documentation of a stream existing within this drainage prior to the impacts occurring it
is not clear if a stream ever existed within this location let along the type or quality of
stream if one did exist. Also, the DWQ does not require stream mitigation for permanent
stream impacts less than 150 feet. Other than the avoidance of additional permanent
impacts to streams (including those within areas previously approved for impacts), the
applicant does not propose any additional mitigation for the 148 feet of permanent,
perennial stream impacts. If this is not acceptable to the USAGE, then the applicant
proposes payment into the Wetlands Restoration Fund (as described above) for any
required stream mitigation. Based on the quality (see Stream Forms) of the stream reach
upstream from the crossing the applicant does not believe that a mitigation ratio greater
than 1:1 should be required if the USACE requires mitigation.
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 148 (if required)
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.365
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
PUBLIC INTEREST ISSUES
In a document provided by the U.S. Corps of Engineers titled "Wetlands & Corps
Wetland Regulations" and dated August 13, 2001, the Corps of Engineers lists 21
specific factors that will be reviewed related to Public Interest. These factors are similar
to the "Evaluation Factors" listed on Page 8 of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Regulatory Program, Application Information document dated May 1985. These items
are as follows:
Conservation Safety Economics
Water Quality Aesthetics Fish & Wildlife Values
Wetlands Historic Properties Shore Erosion and Accretion
Flood Hazard Water Supply Food & Fiber Production
Floodplain Value Navigation Environmental Concerns
Land Use Energy Needs Property Ownership
Recreation Mineral Needs Needs and Welfare of the People
Responses to each of the 21 Public Interest Issues are presented below
Conservation:
No additional impacts are proposed to the remaining wetlands, streams and riparian
buffers on the site beyond those that have already occurred or those proposed within this
new application.
Water Quality:
What is commonly referred is as "Village Pond" located in Governors Village is actually
a large stormwater management pond required by Chatham County to meet the County
Water Supply Watershed stormwater requirements to control stormwater runoff from
Governors Village (see the April 29, 2005 letter from Keith Megginson, Chatham County
Plaiming Director attached to the Prior Project History section of this application). As
such, the applicant believes that this pond will be sufficient to meet the DWQ Water
Quality Certification requirements (15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(5)) for the protection of
downstream water quality standards through the use of onsite stormwater control
measures.
The construction will meet all of the local, State and Federal design requirements with
regards to protection of water quality. The surface waters on site are classified by the
DWQ as "WS-IV, NSW". The development will comply with all DWQ water quality
standards for class "WS-IV, NSW" waters.
Wetlands:
No additional impacts are proposed to the remaining wetlands on the site beyond those
that have already occurred or those proposed within this new application. Wetland
functions will therefore be retained within these areas.
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
PUBLIC INTEREST ISSUES
The applicant proposes to avoid additional impacts to wetland areas that were previously
approved for impacts in 1996 as described within this application and the Wetland Impact
Maps. Also, additional wetlands and waters beyond those previously determined to be
jurisdictional in 1996 exist on the site today. These areas will be avoided as depicted on
the Wetland Impact Maps.
Flood Hazard:
The project site is located outside of the 104-year floodplain and only has approximately
an 80-acre watershed above the stormwater pond therefore flooding is not of concern.
The culverts below the proposed road / driveway crossings have been reviewed and
approved by the local municipality to ensure the proper passage of any high water events.
Floodplain Value:
The site is located outside the 100-year floodplain, therefore there are no impacts to any
existing FEMA designated floodplain areas. No significant flood plains exist along the
headwater stream systems located on the project site.
Land Use:
The proposed development is currently being or has already been developed as a mixed-
use commercial and residential community. The surrounding properties are primarily
residential with some commercial and vacant woodland.
Recreation:
No existing public or private recreational facilities will be negatively affected by the
development and operation of the facility. Governors Village property owners will be
able to enjoy the recreational activities within the community, including but not limited
the walking trails around the "Village Pond".
Safety:
All entrances to the development along state roads have already or will meet the
standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT). In addition to
the NCDOT constraints imposed for the sake of safety, there are also constraints on the
construction process by state law and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
Aesthetics:
The applicant does not believe that Governors Village will negatively the affect aesthetics
of the surrounding properties and many people may feel that this well landscaped
community including the large "Village Pond" enhances the aesthetics of the area.
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
PUBLIC INTEREST ISSUES
Historic Properties:
The State Historic Preservation Office, North Carolina Listings in the National Register
of Historic Places by County document provided on their web site (see
http:/; NvNvNv.hpo.dcr.state.nc.usirirlist.htm) does not list any historic places within the
property boundaries. The State Historic Preservation Office has been contacted and a
copy of their February 22, 2005 response letter is attached. In it they state that they are
aware of no historic resources that would be affected by the project.
Water Supply:
The site is located within the Jordan Lake water supply watershed. Chatham County has
reviewed the development under their water supply ordinances. The development will
comply with all local water supply ordinances as required and approved by the DWQ.
The development will comply with all surface water standards for "WS-IV NSW" waters.
"Village Pond" was required by the County to control stormwater runoff from the
Governors Village as described in the April 29, 2005 letter from Keith Nlegginson,
Chatham County Planning Director attached to the Prior Project History section of this
application. The applicant does not believe that development of the site and the resulting
water needs will adversely affect any existing off-site water supplies.
Navigation:
The wetlands and waters proposed to receive fill materials are not located in navigable
waters. No impacts to navigation are anticipated as a result of site development.
Energy Needs:
Electrical energy for the development will be supplied by the local network as operated
by Progress Energy. The development will not generate any of its own power and will
not have energy needs in excess of normal residential development.
Mineral Needs:
Neither supply nor demand for mineral resources will be negatively affected by the
development of this site.
Economics:
The applicant does not believe that the development will have a negative affect on the
economy of the surrounding community. In fact, the new residences and businesses will
provide new property taxes and spark retail and service related businesses within the
nearby communities.
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
PUBLIC INTEREST ISSUES
Fish & Wildlife Values:
The following species have been federally listed as Threatened or Endangered for
Chatham County:
Bald Eagle Haheetus leucocephalus Threatened
Red-cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
Cape Fear Shiner Notropis mekistocholas Endangered
Harperella Phlimnium nodosum Endangered
Of these, the Bald Eagle is the only federally listed Threatened or Endangered species
listed on the Farrington, NC USGS topographic quadrangle.
Utilizing the N.C. Natural Heritage Program (NHP) database of all recorded protected
species occurrences, S&EC found that there are no federally listed species occurring
onsite. However, within a three-mile radius of the site, five occurrences of the Bald
Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), as recently as 2003 have been recorded. These
occurrences are shown on the attached map. It is not expected that activities at the
subject property will have a detrimental effect on the Bald Eagle population.
No direct or secondary adverse impacts to federally listed species are expected from the
construction of the proposed subdivision.
Village Pond located on the property and retained stream, wetland and riparian corridors
are anticipated to provide habitat and wildlife corridors both within and through the
community.
Shore Erosion & accretion:
This public interest issue is not applicable to this application as the development will not
affect shore erosion or accretion.
Food & Fiber Production:
The development will produce neither food nor fiber as part of the facility operations.
Environmental Concerns:
1'V oise
No adverse impacts to noise levels in the area are anticipated from the development of
this site.
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
PUBLIC INTEREST ISSUES
Prevention ofContainination
All construction activities and resulting infrastructure will be in compliance with
applicable environmental laws. No facilities are planned that have a significant risk for
production or release of environmental contaminants.
Erosion and,' "ediTnentation
Construction at the site will be performed under an approved Erosion and Sedimentation
Control Plan to minimize sedimentation and erosion in the construction areas.
StoiYn«vater during construction will be managed using sedimentation basins and other
control devises that will reduce the sediment load in runoff and will attenuate peak flow
rates to prevent downstream erosion.
Air Quality
No adverse impacts to local air quality are anticipated as a result of this development.
Property Ownership:
The applicant currently owns the portions of the development where impacts to waters
are proposed. Many of the properties within the remainder of the development have been
sold and currently have multiple different property owners. Adjacent property owners to
Governors Village are listed in Block 24.
Needs and Welfare of the People:
The applicant believes that the completion of this development will go towards meeting
the increasing needs of housing and services for the future residents of this community
and Chatham County and will in turn enhance the welfare of the people of this
community and it's future residents.
?
% &
FEB 2 4 2005 JU
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Peter B. Sandbeck, Administrator
Michael F. Easley, Governor Office of Archives and History
Lisbeth C.-Evans, Secretary Division of Historical Resources
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary David Brook, Director
February 22, 2005
Jessica Regan
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA.
1101O,Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Governor's Village, S&EC Project No. 8951.W2, Chatham County, ER 05-0219
Dear Ms. Regan:
Thank you for your letter of February 2, 2005, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the proposed undertaking and are aware of no historic resources which would
be affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the undertaking as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
eter B. Sandbeck
Location Mailing Address Telephone/Fax
ADMINISTRATION 507 N. Blount Street, Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 [phone]/733-8653
RESTORATION 515 N. Blount Street, Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 [phone]/715-4801
SURVEY & PLANNING 515 N. Blount Street, Raleigh, NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 [phone]/715-4801

'DllHHAM 1'A __--
?. ;?,a CHATHAM W '%' :
C ` Z,
s
A
°1 1
X )a
t
1 o cry RREN C-n 0F: SAw e-MaLC5
N

ProjectM Scale:
"
' Figure 1 - USGS
8951.W2 1
:4000 Farrington Quad
Project Date:
Mgr.: SC 01.20.05
Governor's Village
Chatham County, NC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd. - Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone].[phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
May 9, 2005
S&EC Project # 9325.w1
To: US Army Corps of Engineers N.C. Division of Water Quality
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Todd Tugwell Attn: Cyndi Karoly
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615 Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
From: Bob Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Governors Village, Chapel Hill, NC - "After-the-Fact Individual Permit Application
On behalf of the owner, Governors Club Limited Partnership, please find attached a complete
application and supplemental information requesting an Individual Permit from the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) and an Individual Certification from the N.C. Division of Water
Quality (DWQ). Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or require
additional information.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name Governors Village
Project Type Commercial & Residential Development
Owner / Applicant Governors Club Limited Partnership
County Chatham
Nearest Town Chapel Hill
Waterbody Name UT to Cub Creek
Basin / Sub-basin 03-06-05
Index Number 16-41-2-10-(0.5)
Class WS-IV, NSW
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0.019
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.365
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.041
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.425
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 202
Attachments:
Individual Permit Application Form & Block Sheets
Agent Authorization
Farrington, NC - USGS Map
Chatham County Soil Survey Map
Site Photos
Impact Map Sheets
Wetland & Stream Fomts
Prior Project History (including jurisdictional determination, past approvals, etc.)
Mitigation Plan
Public Interest Issues
$475 Application Fee to DWQ
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-0003
(33 CFR 325) Expires December 31. 2004
The Public burden for this collection of information is sestimated to average 10 hours per response, although the majority of applications should require
5 hours or less. This includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the collection of information- Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of
information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of Information
Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget,
Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC 20503. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law,
no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control
number. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having
jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection , Research and
Sanctuaries Act, 33 USC 1413, Section 103. Principal Purpose: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application for a
permit. Routine Uses; This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies.
Submission of requested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit
be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this
application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed
activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned.
1. APPLICATION NO.
2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 13. DATE RECEIVED 14. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BY APPL/CAN
5. APPLICANT'S NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (an aoNnr is not required)
Governors Club Limited Partnership S&EC, PA - Bob Zarzecki, Env. Spec.
5. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS
c/o Dan Vincent 11010 Raven Ridge Road
PO Box 3923, Sanford, NC 27331 Raleigh, NC 27614
T. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE 10. AGENT'S PHONE NOS W/AREA CODE

a. Residence a. Residence
b. Business [phone] E b. Business [phone]
11. STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
I hereby authorize, * see Aqent Authorization to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to
furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE
NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (sc,, instrucrions
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
13. NAME OF WATERBODY. IF KNOWN Id»nw-hlel
UT to Cub Creek
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Chatham NC
COUNTY STATE
16, OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN, tserinstruetions)
LAT 35.8515587 N / LONG 79.024759 W
14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS rl appllcaarc)
Governors Village
Village Park Drive
Chapel Hill, NC 27517
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
The site is located in Governors Village on Mt. Carmel Church Road, Chatham County, NC- To
get to the site from Raleigh: Take 40 West to NC54, Exit 273A toward Chapel Hill; Turn left
onto Farrington Rd. (follow signs towards Governors Club); Take Farrington Rd to Mt. Carmel
Church Road; Turn right on Mt. Carmel Church Rd; Turn right into Governors Village.
NG FORM 4345, Jul 97 EDITION OF FEB 94 IS OBSOLETE. (Proponent: CECW-OR)
IS. Nature of Activity (Description of projecf, include all /eaturesi
see attached "Block 18"
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see ins-tructioasl
see attached "Block 19"
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(si for Discharge
see attached "Block 20"
21 . Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each TVDe in Cubic Yards
see attached "Block 21"
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see insrruchons/
see attached "Block 22"
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes Q No L:=1 IF YES. DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
see attached "Block 23"
24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (If more than can be entered here,
please attach a supplemental list).
see attached "Block 24"
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL' IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
SEE ATTACHED "BLOCK 25"
USACE 404 1995503160, etc. 04/10/96 04/26/96 n/a
DWQ 401 96-0362 04/10/96 06/08/96 n/a
DWQ 401 96-0884 09/05/96 10/18/96 n/a
"Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building and flood plain permits
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this
applcation is complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the
duly authorized agent of the applicant. J
Ao ds,
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE S E F A NT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $ 10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
BLOCK SHEETS
BLOCK 18 - Nature of Activity
The project involves the completion of development of Governors Village mixed-use
commercial and residential subdivision located in northern Chatham County, NC. As
described further in Block 23, much of the development has already been completed.
Construction of Governors Village began in the mid-1990s. Approvals have been
received by both the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE; Action ID 199503160 and
199600078) and the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ; Project No. 96-0392 and 96-
0884). No additional impacts to waters beyond those previously approved or requested
within this application are anticipated at this time.
The applicant is requesting approval to impact waters for an existing road crossing (see
Impact Map #2 and the USACE Notification of Unauthorized Activity provided in the
attached Prior Project History section of this application). In addition to this road
crossing the applicant is requesting approval to impact wetlands and waters for the
construction of one additional road crossing (see Impact Map #3), utility crossings and lot
fill. Many of these impacts were previously approved, but they have not yet occurred and
the previous approvals have expired. These activities and the dimensions of the
structures are illustrated in the attached "Impact Maps".
The materials to be used include earthen fill to construct the base for the roads and lots.
The roads and parking areas will be paved and use curb and gutter to manage stormwater
runoff. Paving materials include asphalt and concrete. Curb and gutter materials include
concrete metal drop inlets and reinforced concrete pipes (RCP). The existing road
crossing (see Impact Map #2) was constructed using twin 42" RCPs (see Site Photo).
The proposed second crossing (see Impact Map43) will be installed using a single 54"
RCP. The residential structures both already built and proposed include stick-built
single-family homes and townhomes with concrete driveways and walks. The
commercial buildings are constructed of typical commercial building materials including
primarily steel, concrete block, brick and glass.
The previously approved and constructed pond commonly referred to as the "Village
Pond" is a large, stormwater management pond required by the County to meet the
Chatham County Water Supply watershed stormwater requirements for Governors
Village (see attached letter from Chatham County dated April 29, 2005 provided within
the attached Prior Project History section of this application). Stormwater runoff from
Governors Village (including the proposed development areas not currently constructed)
drain to and are managed by this pond.
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
BLOCK SHEETS
BLOCK 19 - Project Purpose
Project Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to complete construction of development of Governors
Village, a mixed-use commercial and residential development located between Mt.
Carmel Church Road, Whipporwill Lane and Old Farrington Road in northern Chatham
County, NC. There are basically three properties that have not been developed within
Governors Village. The properties north and west of the "Village Pond" were previously
approved by the USACE and DWQ for impacts to wetlands and waters. The property
east of the "Village Pond" was added to Governors Village this spring. No jurisdictional
wetlands or waters are proposed to be impacted on this property other than the road
crossing impacts (see Impact Map #3) to connect this property to the rest of Governors
Village. Properties to the south of the "Village Pond" are not part of Governors Village
and consist of existing residential properties.
Project Need:
Governors Village provides retail, office, other commercial services and housing for
residents within the surrounding community as well as existing and future residents
within Governors Village. This development helps to address service and housing needs
of the community's growing population.
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
BLOCK SHEETS
BLOCK 20 - Reasons for Discharge
Proposed Commercial / Retail Area - The wetland impact proposed on Impact Map #1 is
required to complete construction of the commercial / retail section of Governors Village
previously planned for the development in the mid-1990s. These impacts were
previously approved by both the USACE and DWQ (see the Prior Project History section
attached to this application).
Existing Road Crossing - The existing road crossing (see Impact Map #2) was required
to provide a second access for the existing townhomes north of the "Village Pond". The
crossing not along improves traffic flow through Governors Village, it also provides for
multiple points of ingress and egress in case of any emergency.
Proposed Second Crossing - The proposed second crossing (see Impact Map #3) is
required to connect the new 49-lot single-family residential subdivision east of "Village
Pond" to the remainder of Governors Village. Without this crossing the residents of this
community would need to utilize existing state roads (Old Farrington Road, etc.) and at
least one intersection of state roads just to drive from their home to the retail area of
Governors Village. This is not only twice the distance it will also lead to unnecessary
traffic congestion on these state roads. In addition to connecting the subdivision to the
remainder of Governors Village, this crossing will provide a second point of ingress and
egress for the community.
Proposed Townhomes - The wetland impact proposed on Impact Map #4 is to fill
wetlands within a drained pond bottom to allow for the construction of residential
townhomes west of the "Village Pond". This property (previously known as the Dossett
Parcel) has recently been approved by Chatham County for the construction of 76
townhomes from the previously approved commercial / office development. The wetland
area has a surface connection to the "Village Pond" via a channel that is not depicted on
either the USGS topographic map or Chatham County Soil Survey. The channel was
determined by S&EC staff to be an ephemeral ditch below the wetland / drained pond
and above the existing walking trail around the "Village Pond". The applicant does not
dispute the jurisdiction of this wetland area or it's determination as non-isolated.
However it should be noted that S&EC staff do not believe that this original pond in this
location was constructed on either an intermittent or perennial stream. The quality and
functions of this wetland area are low compared to other wetland systems.
Utilities - Impacts to wetlands and waters for utility crossings are also proposed on
Impact Maps #2 and #3. These impacts are required to provide utility services to
development areas described within this application.
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
BLOCK SHEETS
BLOCK 21 - Type of Material Being Discharged and the
Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Type of Area of Volume of
Site Number
Type of Impact
{e.g., forested, marsh, Material Impact Discharge
(indicate on herbaceous bog, etc.) Being (sq. yds.) (cubic yds.)
map) Discharged * *?`
Map #1, IA Commercial Fill Herbaceous No 533 178
Map #1, 1B Rip-Rap Dissipater Herbaceous No 39 13
Map #2, 2A Utility (temporary) Herbaceous No 59 20
Map #3, 3C Utility (temporary) Headwater Forest No 107 36
Map 44 Residential Fill Herbaceous No 1,031 344
(Drained Pond)
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 591
* Areas are rounded up to the nearest square yard.
* * Volumes are rounded up to the nearest cubic yard and assume wetlands to be 0.333 yards
deep and do not account for discharge materials above this 0.333-yard assumed depth.
STREAM IMPACT TABLE
Stream Impact
Type of
Area of Impact Volume of
Number Stream Type of Perennial or
Material Being
{sq. yds.) Discharge
(indicate on Name Impact Intermittent?
Discharged (cubic yds.)
map)
Map #2,2A UT Teility Perennial 3 10 4
p•
Map #2, 2B UT Road Perennial 3 39 13
Map #2, 2C UT Rip-Rap Perennial 5 20 7
Map #3, 3D UT utility Intermittent 2-5 25 9
Temp.
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 33
* Areas are rounded up to the nearest square yard.
* * Volumes are rounded up to the nearest cubic yard and assume an average depth of streams
to be 0.333 yards and do not account for discharge materials above this 0.333-yard assumed
depth.
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
BLOCK SHEETS
BLOCK 21 - Type of Material Being Discharged and the
Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards (cant.)
OPEN WATER IMPACT TABLE
(Including all Waters of US excluding Wetlands, Intermittent Streams & Perennial
Streams listed above.)
Open Water Type of Waterbody
Impact Type of (lake, pond, estuary, Area of Impact Volume of Discharge
Site Number Impact sound, bay, ocean, (sgyds.) {cubyds.}
(indicate on map) etc.)
Map #3,3A UT Road 78 26
Map #3, 3B UT Rip-Rap Dissipater 121 41
Total Open Water Impact (acres) 67
Areas are rounded up to the nearest square yard.
** Volumes are rounded up to the nearest cubic yard and assume an average depth of streams
to be 0.333 yards and ponds to be 1 yard and do not account for discharge materials above
these assumed depths.
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
BLOCK SHEETS
BLOCK 22 - Surface Areas of Wetlands and Other
Waters Filled
WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number
Type of Impact
{e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on
herbaceous Uog etc.} Floodplain Stream (acres)
map) (yes/no) (linear feet)
Map #1, lA Commercial Fill Herbaceous No 48 0.110
Map #1, 1B Rip-Rap Dissipater Herbaceous No 0 0.008
Map #2,2A** Utility (temporary) Herbaceous No 0 0.012
Map #3, 3C Utility (temporary) Headwater Forest No 0 0.022
Map 44 Residential Fill Herbaceous No - 200 0.213
(Drained Pond)
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.365
All impacts have been rounded to the nearest 111000 of an acre.
* * Impact 2A included both wetland and stream impacts.
STREAM IMPACT TABLE
Stream Impact Stream Perennial or Average
Number Name Type of Intermittent? Stream Width Impact Length Area of Impact

(indicate on
**
Impact
***
Before Impact
(linear feet) k
(acres) '
map)
Map #2,2A UT Teility Perennial 3 20 0.002
p•
Map #2, 2B UT Road Perennial 3 115 0.008
Map #2, 2C UT Rip-Rap Perennial 5 33 0.004
Map #3, 3D UT utility Intermittent 2-5 34 0.005
Temp.
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 148 (Perm.) 0.019
54 (Temp.)
* All impacts have been rounded to the nearest 111000 of an acre & foot
** UT = Unnamed tributary to Cub Creek (03-06-05, 16-41-2-10-(0.5), WS-IV NSW)
*** See Stream Forms
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
BLOCK SHEETS
BLOCK 22 - Surface Areas of Wetlands and Other
Waters Filled {cant.}
OPEN WATER IMPACT TABLE
(Including all Waters of US excluding Wetlands, Intermittent Streams & Perennial
Streams listed above.)
Open Water Name of Type of
Impact Waterbody Waterbody Area of Impact
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, (acres)
(indicate on estuary, sound,
ma bay, ocean, etc.
Map #3, 3A UT Road Pond 0.016
Map #3, 3B UT Rip-Rap Dissipater Pond 0.025
Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0.041
UT = Unnamed tributary to Cub Creek (03-06-05, 16-41-2-10-(0.5), WS-IV" NSW)
All impacts have been rounded to the nearest 1/1000 of an acre
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0.019
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.365
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.041
Total Impact to Waters of the U. S. (acres) 0.425
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 202
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
BLOCK SHEETS
BLOCK 23 - Is Any Portion of the Work Already
Complete?
Existing Conditions:
The project involves the completion of the development of the Governors Village
residential and commercial mixed-use development located on Mt. Carmel Church Road
(SR 1008) in Chatham County, NC. A large portion of the development has already been
constructed, residential and commercial lots have been sold, buildings and homes have
been constructed, and businesses and residents are occupying their buildings and homes.
The road ! driveway crossing depicted on Impact Map #2 has already been constructed.
The owner believed that all appropriate 404 and 401 approvals had been received at the
time the road was constructed. However, the owner was notified in a letter dated
December 27, 2004 from Mr. Todd Tugwell of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
(US ACE) that this activity was not authorized (Action ID 200520149). The USACE and
DWQ previously authorized impacts to these waters as described in the attached Prior
Project History. Although as Mr. Tugwell explains in his letter, the permit had expired
prior to construction of the roadway, and the plans have been modified from the
originally proposed plans.
The additional impacts proposed within this application have not yet been constructed.
Dredged or Fill Material Already Discharged:
The activities within Waters of the U. S. that have already occurred include the discharge
of fill into wetlands and other waters for the development of roads, utilities, and
commercial and residential lots. Waters have also been impacted by both fill and
flooding for the construction of the stormwater management pond.
Previous Agency Involvement & Approvals:
Please refer to the attached Prior Project History for additional information and reference
materials. Approvals have been received from the DWQ (DWQ Project No.(s) 96-0362
& 96-0884) and USACE (Action ID 199503160 and 199600078) for impacts to 3.889
acres of waters within the Governors Village development. The impacts proposed within
this application include both modifications to these previous approvals and new impacts
not yet approved.
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
BLOCK SHEETS
BLOCK 24 - Names & Addresses of Adjoining Property
Owners, Lessees, et., Whose Property Adjoins the
Project Site.
(The addresses of property owners whose property adjoins the project site (Governors
Village) list below were obtained from the Chatham County GIS website and do not
include current property owners within the project site.)
BB Endeavors, LLC Horton, Todd Brantley
23107 Umstead Road 1742 Old Arbor Way
Chapel Hill, NC 27514 Mebane, NC 27302
Harris, Kelli Leigh & Charles E. McCrimmon, Lewis M. & Linda M.
111 McKenzie Circle 211 Old Farrington Road
Clayton, NC 27302 Chapel Hill, NC 27514
Boggs, Samuel G. Goodwin, Thelma H.
118 Mt. Carmel Church Road 136 Mt. Carmel Church Road
Chapel Hill, NC 27514 Chapel Hill, NC 27514
Wilson, Michael T. & Joan G. Governors Village P.O.A.
172 Mt. Carmel Church Road PO Box 99149
Chapel Hill, NC 27514 Raleigh, NC 27624
Governors Club Ltd. Partnership Village Custom Homes Co.
PO Box 3923 721 Mt. Carmel Church Road
Sanford, NC 27331 Chapel Hill, NC 27517
L & E Holdings, LLC Nature Trail Associates
781 Mt. Carmel Church Road 9073 Nemo Street
Chapel Hill, NC 27516 Los Angelas, CA 90069
The Caryle Group, Inc. Cheek, Ben Ford
9073 Nemo Street 1130 Madison Womble Way
Los Angelas, CA 90069 Cha el Hill, NC 27514
Sparrow, Carol C. Carolina Meadows, Inc.
204 Graduate Court 100 Carolina Meadows
Durham, NC 27713 Chapel Hill, NC 27517-8505
Porter, Lester Ray Jr. Porter, Donald Brack
998 Whippoorwill Lane 706 Copperline Apt. 102
Chapel Hill, NC 27517-7542 Chapel Hill, NC 27516
Carpenter, John William & Sue A.
256 Old Farrington Road
Chapel Hill, NC 27514
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
BLOCK SHEETS
BLOCK 25 - Information about Approvals or Denials by
other Agencies.
Local Approvals:
Numerous local approvals have been granted for the Governors Village development
including Erosion & Sediment Control Permits, stormwater, subdivision plan approvals,
and many others. These approvals have not been included within this application, but can
be provided upon request.
N.C. Division of Water Quality Compliance:
The N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has approved impacts for the entire
development (DWQ Project No. 96-0362 & 96-0884). Please refer to the attached Prior
Project History section of this application for additional information about these
approvals. The new developer is requesting approval of a water quality certification from
the DWQ as part of this application.
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The Current Landowner
Name: 60 ve-/t U(.5 e4-L L- I m r-kd ESC i/clS ?!!)'
Address: P. (), -8 0 X 3 7a3
x7
Phone: C c/ l 5? ?3/ r 605V
Project Name/Description: C70V" Y10r5
Date: 5- /?K/o 5
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn: Todd Tugwell
Field Office: Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the current property owner, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA to
act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request
supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The _A- day of
May 2 a 0.S
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
government officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC
to arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the site.
6oyeino? C/?6 ?irrlr?c? ??ie?lt»
Print Property Owner's Name
Property Owner's Signature
cc: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NCDENR - DWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
cc: Bob Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
N
A NTS
A Date: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Farrington, NC EI
ez 5.2.05 USGS Quad 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.• Raleigh, NC 27614
Governor's Village [phone] • [phone]
Chatham County, NC Web Page: www.SandEC.com
Ok,
? ?. V
_y s ti -?- ,. 7. G t o
a
9tiM 3 t ( A?°? ?a .?
r'a r F
,e 111111 Y.
1 ar...•,,,R...'?, - - ? tt . ??-' --. 5368 <p ,
ti
c.
"••--mod ,. jfj ? ., 3 ??. y.g ,? ?."
` p F
A ?t]])j 4 ?j? uy? ? ? ?? ??M 1. r (A O ? t p
i J
S i
N

Project# Scale:
9325.w1 NTS
Project Date:
Mgr.: BZ 05-02-05
Chatham County
Soil Survey
Governor's Village
Chatham County, NC
536-B = Creedmoor-Green Level Complex, 2 - 6%
536-C = Creedmoor-Green Level Complex, 6 - 10%
5A = Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 - 2%
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] - [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com

y?

? ? l
aF

Y iq
l? 1
s

Governors Village Parcel "E"; Wetland Impact No. IA, Wetland Impact Map # 1
Proposed; Photo looking North
'.

5t?•'fi'< -
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
SITE PHOTOS
Governors Village Parcel "E" Impact No. 1B; Wetland Impact Map # 1;
Proposed; Photo looking North to existing 24" pipe
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
SITE PHOTOS
Stream & Wetlands to be Avoided; South of Impact No. 1 B, Wetland Impact Map # 1
Stream & Wetlands Avoided; North of Impact No. 2A, Wetland Impact Map # 2.
Road Crossing Impact No. 2B & 2C; road is existing and impacts have already occurred;
Area includes portion of Utility Impact No. 2A;
Wetland Impact Map # 2; Photo looking South towards Existing Road Crossing
Wetland & Stream South of Road Crossing Impact No. 2B & 2C;
Wetland Impact Map # 2; Photo looking South towards Existing Walking Trail &
Stonnwutcr Pond
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
SITE PHOTOS
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
SITE PHOTOS

Location of Proposed Road/Driveway Crossing No. 3A & 313; Wetland Impact Map # 3;
Open Water Impact to back waters of existing stormwater pond;
Photo looking South towards existing Walking Trail & Stormwater Pond
.s
%r.
r,
?]aa
Approximate Location of Proposed Utility / 8" Sanitary Sewer Crossing;
Temporary Impacts to Stream & \k'etland;
Impact No. 3C & 3D; Wetland Impact Map # 3
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
SITE PHOTOS
Typical Wetlands & Stream Avoided; Wetland Impact Map # 3
Aerial Photo of Drained Pond; )ATetland Impact Map # 4;
2002 Photo taken from Chatham County GIS N,\, ebsite
o? z
?z
W = rn
Zrn
KZ
'BQ Z I r,
ArnC
?> 79 >
&ZrnZ?` ?
y
O ?
N
w
O
d
U)
J
O
0
0 0
N
(9
G
3
N

as z Z
?'g-
n
w
Zrn
izo
Q ? z
ln<
T= Z D
rn c)
°grnD
in rn
V.
C
J Z S'i1 Z O v
24 1n Z
O
N
0
CIl
C)
D
r O
rn
IIO
= o z
O
N 70
---7
-17
N
Q
O
C)
m
=
a
3
O

z
v
-
pp
?
?
M
? 0
o
m
?
z

C
z
C)
A
3 C
-
4 3
z 30 a
z
a
*k m
..
O
O
O
r
O
z
? i
1
1
r
I A
I
I ? r
I? + I
j
a -?
IN n !
o rjf
r r
i
?o r
I !
t I
j! 1
t
r O
r ;v j!
? t
r 5 !
! ? t
? NI
r ?5 +
r r
I ?
r ( --
j! r
r t
( ? 1
i
1 +
t +
+ ! 0.!!7
r ! E 5ARU
o
yt
!r `tom
r +
EX15T. 55M
J RIM-25$.7
INV IN (M-
INV. IN (E)-
INV. OUf
n
r N 1 III
? N I
r ?a
f
f
%/II I A/`P
%, I- -k---
PARK
DRIVE
EXTENSION
------_
GO VFRtV O
_ `y
>?D R! VE
l

;
-? _

r
r (
-n
r ? r
r

r' --f
?
1
+
I J
1
f
r
r
d7 f
r
1 ? 1 1

f
r-
y
+?
r
f
i r
1
j l
7?r? ?
f

t r?` -
(
( I

fy
4
!
-
c r--- - ?+
r 1

03

D_ 1 _ 7 !-_?_ ?-fir !

rl y --_?f
'71 y

' _r
1
j rn
r?
4 ?

r f ? ' r

'..
I
I
k
N ? r
? n
?
C ?~
,
-
-i o ? r r f t

r
- r
--- O
L
a ~ r r--- = D? r
r t--_-m ? Q
z T _
r -0F !
SEND
r ?

! ! O

1
LI
pzrv
N

? 0 Tv
47.5
2
N
?
rn
47.
47, I
Y `
_
v
I? -" v a
J
/
/

7a,
?n -- ------------ J;QAE hD-l Y-L ?
2
2
2
QQ?--
No \ - -g

W+ N
a

0122ACYtPS --
S,i118 SQ. F7. ? w
v n'

7
v !
o n (() r) +J ) L ?_ ?\ ) _x I
rqN z n r Q ) r al w t'-__ ,-- O
52 A n It r `` _ _ _ ,yam / .?
03n rn z ) t ja»s? • ! ~- 1 ?? ` M SEND
m -1 Z + r a o n?s2sbm t _ 1+ ?r? 1
JIJr oK,E (r 4 N - r ~ lF,ri. I
L4 rn
?D Z
! ! O «K?
l T J Q Z N
f -Lo
91
O +, RIM25873 L_r- I i_1_?.?_I f j j wiu`n=
--J
INV IN (M-247-5 ? j
INV. W (q-247.2
INV. OUT- 247!
r/I QBg? r ? ?QQe_
C-) ( 4 f I 7o?II?U1 j -
-a !
C)) ° C Z
C Z W N`
1RI TCpRR m _
G)
j C
o a { x,w J_ O
Z I <
M
U I I s OJ22 N / = z
N
711 121ASO-FT. I O Z
_
I G)
N j m
cn N
v
N Exls-r
36" RCPT`-" j - JOHN BRANCH LOOP
)4 ?N: 4i
N
V 1! AG! t
PARK
2 DRIVE \ \?E I
a \ 1; IS _
EXTENSION R .o F2 RCS =E)CI
!
11
p 7n
y N ? { N
w--cn?-
/? DAVID STONE
{ d IS ?f \ N AEI 0
N \ rr?
z a ?
Cnoo
N N
Z / OmC
I go<
`? ` -su3cnoZo azrass?p.rr. D*r
MG)
13 ??+ +N \ \ A T zU)m
- o = \\? ?' I mot'
= Z m
v=M N°
N N
a ?N - \
22
C? 1
3-Z?
t? 3 3 M 00 v°
C ? cf)
mm
Z -I r 0r- r) 0 ED
° Cj) ?j
LLL-L] 9 m Z II1, Ln :n :n 71 7n
go i M O
Z o
M m !?rni?N? n
11

? f i

1
f o
+r

,v

v r

D
r r (q r 9)
t
j

w rn v, v, ? w r-

m m m m m m
v ? a n r n

SINGLE-FAMILY

I
EXIST.55MH I
P407
F405 R1M-263.50
INV IN(NW)
251
9
1
-
INV. IN(M-251.P
F408 INV. OUT-251,1 Z
I

ND5 F409 I
0.1 ACRES I
G,G3 54. FT. I
I
17410 ? cl}
17402 I
17411
z
m
r
10 ON EITHER
SIDE
IPACT 3C F l0s'
UTILITY
WETLAND
IMPACT F10.,
927 5.17.
# `4 I IMPACT 3D
F4?2 17413 UTILITY
_17400 STREAM
/
1733 CLVKr IMPACT
M 34 L.E.
p4011 --- 188 S.F.
0?
P CNKf 1733 -
F302
F363 c'^^ 17334 F333
z
w
m
EXIST. 55MH
RIM-261.55
NV IN -249.2
INV. OUT-249.1
F 109,-
NE
w
7
I
GOV. VILLA
HOMEOWNI
ASSOCIATI
I
I
G Grou RBVI510n5:
p5 inc. NORTH GOVERNORS VILLAGE
LAND U51= EVALUATION WETLAND IMPACT MAP #3
CIVIL f=NGINf zF ING 50' 0 ®50' 100'
CON-9TRUCTION MANAGEMENT CHATHAM COUNTY, NC
1051 Permberton HIII Road, Su to 201 Arer, NC 27502
Voice (919)3G7-8790-Fax(919)3G7-8791 SCALE: -50 (`H01"IZ.)
Ali
0 '
A
OS
?o
`0
_7O
17109
109
CX
O?
Q? 'A'

MPACT TOTALS
3A S.F. 672 OPENWATER
ROAD 3B S.F. 1,068 OPENWATER
3C S.F. 927 WETLAND
UTILITY S.F. 188 STREAM
3D L.F. 34 STREAM
UL
Q ? N?
___ FI09
F'?'i •a 17329 17328 F327 17326 F310ATfOH F
'? 17325 17324 F3
`?r?' ° n F30b 173a9
17310+ 1731?? 1FES F?11 Fa12 731

N/F
GOVERNORS CLUB LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

I J V M• -

I
I \
I /
I '
z IY
0
<S ?> w I
I I
I
I I
I
JI
I I
I
I
I I
I
I
lI
I I
I
I
I
I I
l
I ?
/`)1 I
FI22
18" RCP PROPOSED TOWNHOME
/ DEVELOPMENT
--"?RpPO?ED
ROAD
EXTEN51ON

JUROD1CTIONAL
PI20+1
100k pf I&
? rrll6
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I
flL
FI IS 5,2
DRAINED FOND I i la
12
ring

GOVERNORS VILLAGE
WETLAND IMPACT
FILL FOR PADS
9,242 S.F.
Groun ® Re nlon5: GOVERNORS VILLAGE
Group 5l inc. NORTH PROPOSED TOWNHOMES IMPACT
LAND U5E ffVALUATIQN
CIVIL. If NGIN1=1=1ZIN67' 60' a 60' 120' WETLAND IMPACT MAP #4
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
1051 Permbvton Hill Road, 5urte 201 Apex, NC 27,502 CHATHAM COUNTY, NC
Voice [phone].fax (a 19) 397-8791 SCALE.- 1"=60' (Horiz.)
DATA FORM - ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Wetland Delineation Performed by Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project/Site: Governor's Village Date: 2/23/2005
Applicant/Owner: Governor's Club County: Chatham
Investigator: Bob Zarzeckl State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Plot ID: Upland
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Andropogon virginicus PNG FAC- 9.
2. Pinus taeda NT FAC 10.
3. Juncuseffusus PNEGL FACW+ 11.
4. Rubus spp. NS FACU- 12.
5. Quercus alba NT FACU 13.
6. Acer rubrum NT FAC 14.
7. Carya glabra NT FACU 15.
8. Juniperus virginiana NT FACU- 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-)
25%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
_Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: >12 (in.) X Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >12 (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: >12 (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Wetland Delineation Performed by Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Creedmoor Sandy Loam Drainage Class: Moderately Well
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aquic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Descriptions:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc,
0-12 10 YR 712 7.5 YR 518
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
X Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
Low chroma mixed with bright mottles
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YES (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? NO
Hydric Soils Present? INO Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Na
Remarks
Approved by HQUSACE 3192
DATA FORM - ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Wetland Delineation Performed by Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project/Site: Governor's Village Date: 2/1112005
Applicant/Owner: Governor's Village County: Chatham
Investigator: Bob Zarzecki State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Plot ID: Wetland
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Juncuseffusus PNEGL FACW+ 9. Smilax rotundifolia NWV FAC
2. Nyssa sylvatica NT FAC 10. Ludwigia alternifolia PNEF OBL
3. Acer rubrum NT FAC 11.
4. Carex spp. PNGL FACW 12.
5. Lonicera japonica FAC- NSWV 13.
6. Rubus spp. NS FACU 14.
7. Salix nigra NT OBL 15.
8. Liriodendron tulipifera NT FAC 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-)
80%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
_Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
X Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
X Water Marks
X Drift Lines
X Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) X Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
X Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Wetland Delineation Performed by Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wehadkee silt loam Drainage Class: poorly drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaquentic Endoaquepts Confirm Mapped Type? No
Profile Descriptions:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc,
0-6 Al 10 YR 4/2 silt loam
6-10 B21 g 10 YR 511 silty clay loam
10712 B22g 10 YR 411 fine sandy clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol X Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
X Reducing Conditions X Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes
Remarks
Approved by HQUSACE 3192
DATA FORM - ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Wetland Delineation Performed by Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project/Site: Governor's Village - Dosset Tract Date: 2/23/2005
Applicant/Owner: Governor's Club County: Chatham
Investigator: Bob Zarzecki I Jessica Regan State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes Community ID: Drained Pond
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Plot ID: Upland
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Andropogon virginicus HERB FAC- 9.
2. Pinus taeda SAPLING FAG 10.
3. Juncuseffusus HERB FACW+ 11.
4. Rubus spp. HERB NI 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-)
50%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
_Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: >12 (in.) X Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >12 (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: >12 (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Wetland Delineation Performed by Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Creedmoor Sandy Loam Drainage Class: Moderately Well
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aquic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Descriptions:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc,
0-12 10 YR 712 7.5 YR 518
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? NO (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? NO
Hydric Soils Present? NO Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Na
Remarks
Approved by HQUSACE 3192
DATA FORM - ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Wetland Delineation Performed by Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project/Site: Governor's Village - Dossett Tract Date: 2/23/2005
Applicant/Owner: Governs Village County: Chatham
Investigator: Bob Zarzecki I Jessica Regan State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes Community ID: Drained Pond
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Plot ID: Wetland
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Juncuseffusus HERB FACW+ 9.
2. 10.
3. 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species th at are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-)
100%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
_Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
X Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: >12 (in.) X Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >12 (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: >12 (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Wetland Delineation Performed by Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wehadkee silt loam Drainage Class: poorly drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaquentic Endoaquepts Confirm Mapped Type? No
Profile Descriptions:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc,
0-6 Al 10 YR 4/2 silt loam
6-10 B21 g 10 YR 511 silty clay loam
10712 B22g 10 YR 411 fine sandy clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol X Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
X Reducing Conditions X Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes
Remarks
Approved by HQUSACE 3192
.J?-
O"FICE USE ONLY: USACE AID# DWQ #
? ,q?u its: r.
? ? STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
1. Applicant's Name: h 2. Evaluator's Name: t3? b L? c? IF.
3. Date of Evaluation: c3?' ? ? c 4. Time of Evaluation: 1 .
5. Name of Stream: t) t {-a b C? eat 6. River Basin: L, (2e Te"?
7. Approximate Drainage Area: "io uL?=S 8. Stream Order: k S±
9. Length of Reach Evaluated: - i 30 10. County: C
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): C %c<?e? of J l lc ?, To,a , %n...'I e s
12. Site Coordinates (if known): 3 i S S ?5 -1 r,? -i q . O ? u - C ,
13. Proposed Channel Work (ifan
- Y):
14. Recent Weather Conditions: a,? c.sr,? ?l nrg . / ?? ?/y N wl,? 1c 5i w Nall
15. Site conditions at time of visit: l i?•? ,? w 1? c h nor
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _XNutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed N (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES Q N If yes, estimate the water surface area
18. Does charnel appear on USGS quad map? YES N( 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YE NO
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: * % Residential % Commercial % Industrial _% Agricultural
,.30 % Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other (
21. Bankfull Width: 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): .
23. Channel slope down center of stream: ?t Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight XOccasional Bends -Frequent Meander -Very Sinuous -Braided Channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): LAS
Evaluator's Signature ??' Date 1x1/i/
This channel evaluation is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners a ironmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of
stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 05/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: I t y Project: Latitude: 3 c3 a ( r57Sad
Evaluator: BCb _ r-Lec<<, Site: >??,rti? '? /fig ^'l:? I Longitude: ?4 - u
Total Points: Other C, • ,rA d
Stream is at least intermittent County:
ifz 19 or perennial if? 30 31 e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal Absent Weak Moderate Strong
la. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 0,-). 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9 a Natural Levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley and drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence. ?,
No ?J
F 11
Yes = 3
'Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
1
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or growing season 0 1
_ 2
--?:'
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants 0 0. 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes - 1.
C. Biolow (Subtotal = q )
20b. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 b. Rooted plants in channel 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 c 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 0.5 1 1.5
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1.5
29 b. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
2
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
Nuy W (l btream ulasslucdtlun r orm
Project Name: River Basin: &p,, e.. j, County: C 1?r c ?o Evaluator: &,,o '
DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: C_V, C.el-tL Latitude: 35 . ?515S?? Signature: ,d
Date: lr (?'S USGS QUAD: Longitude: 4=t.tl,? 4 T zj Location/Di i ns`'
C
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this
rwgng system should not be used* Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
2) Is The USDA Texture
(Or Relic)
11 Hydroloey Absent Weak Moderate Strone
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Presents 0 2 3
PRIMARY HYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: I
3) Does
A
11 Hydroloey Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter .k_ -
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 -5 U
Last Known Rain? (*NOTE.- Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Ski i to And # Below*
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 .5 1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(* NOTE: If TotaWsence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 .75 .5 0 0
ti
1 JTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary)= (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
(*NOTE: If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosirv Then Score=0*J
10) Is A 2nd Order or Greater Channel (As Indicated
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR P011VIN t
'Adary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per line)
11 OFFICE USE ONLY: USACE AID#
DWQ#
f i l STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET ?4?
1. Applicant's Name: 2. Evaluator's Name:
3. Date of Evaluation: oti 4. Time of Evaluation: p?
5. Name of Stream: t-u t_.-:', b C c 6. River Basin: .??
7. Approximate Drainage Area: -RP(4?.4e,) 8. Stream Order: j s
9. Length of Reach Evaluated: -(0 0 10. County: C-w?}-+'??^-•
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks):
12. Site Coordinates (if known): 35 . f' `?- ( s52? 1 t.°L ?j • ?? y `t
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any): v ti ?,i
14. Recent Weather Conditions:-
15. Site conditions at time of visit:
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters( Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YESIf yes, estimate the water surface area:
18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES 0) 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? (!?-FS NO
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: 40/o Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
3c),% Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other ( )
21. Bankfull Width: 3 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): I-A
23. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight Occasional Bends -Frequent Meander -Very Sinuous -Braided Channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): .3(a Comments:
Evaluator's Signature it J a Date -Z r oj-
This channel evaluation fo intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of
stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 05/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form version 3.1
Date: Project: Latitude;
?, I t l (;..? V °
Evaluator: Site: Longitude:
Total Points: / Other
.r:-
Stream is at least intermittent County: e,g., Quad Name:
if z 19 or perennial if ? 30
Geomorphology (Subtotal = ?' )
A Absent Weak Moderate Strong
.
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
3
2. Sinuosity 0 1
1 2
2 3
In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
3 0
.
Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
4 0 2 3
.
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3
3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0
0 1
1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
9 a Natural levees 0 1 2 3
3
10. Headcuts lay
0 1
0.5 2
1 1.5
11. Grade controls 1 5
1
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 .
13. Second or greater order channel on existing

0
Yes 3
=
USGS or NRCS map or other documented No
avidPnre_
aMan-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
l_
B. Hydrology butmoiai =
1
2
3
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or 0 1 2' 3
Water in channel -- d or rowin season
5
0
0
16. Leaflitter 1 5 .
1 1.5
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 EA;E
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes 1.5
R 1<
C. tsiology (aupiotat = n- "
2
1
0
Fibrous roots in channel
20b 3
.
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
0 1 2 3
23. Bivalves 1 5
1
24. Fish 0 0.5
0
5 1 .
5
1
25. Amphibians 0 1
,
5 1 .
5
1
Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
26 0 0 .
.
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 0. 1 1.5
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 1.5
29 b. Wetland plants in streambed FAC CW 75 OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2 .0; Other = 0
Items 20 and 21 tocus on the presence or upwiu pianos, -.1 <1 _ r---- - z-
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
,yVt1 Jtream l,lass,,,car,?„ r?„a,
jrojectName: River Basin: t 4` CC'_ County: ^i?4 Evaluator: ?'- u
DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: Cd't*, C ,,y._Latitude: 3q. "GSI3!? q Signature:
Dir ns:16 6,1 ?
Date: USGS QUAD: Longitude: -fc(. : aN?? Location[
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary. V u'lh, ?-u
if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this
riutng system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since - 0 1.5
Last Known Rain? *N TE: I Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Ski is re nd #S Below*
5) Is There Water In Channel Dwing Dry 0 .5 1 1-5
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed?
(* NOTE: If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed
tj
x .J'TA L POINTS (Primary + Secondary)='(IfGreater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
II Hvdrolo¢y Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater /1?
;dare Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1 11. Absent Weak Moderate Strone
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter -
e
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
PRIOR PROJECT HISTORY
DATE ACTION
Ma 17, 1995 Jurisdictional Determination
October 16, 1995 USACE Memo re: Project Area
April 26, 1996 USACE General Permit Verification
June 8, 1996 DWQ Approval #1
October 18, 1996 DWQ Approval #2
December 27, 2004 USACE Notification of Unauthorized Activity
April 29, 2005 County of Chatham Letter re: Stormwater Pond
Jurisdictional Determination (see attached) - The attached jurisdictional determination
(Action ID 199503160) was issued to the development on May 17, 1995. Also, attached
are sketch maps of the delineation that were attached to the determination.
USACE Memo re: Project Area (see attached) - On October 16, 1995 Ms. Jean
Manuele wrote a "Memorandum for the Record" stating that the Polk and Dossett Tracts
(now Governors Village) will be considered separate developments from the Governors
Chub subdivision as it pertains to the applicability of Nationwide Permit No. 26. We
have since received verbal confirmation from the USACE that the Governors Village
development will be considered a separate development from the Governors Club
subdivision.
USACE General Permit Verification (see attached) - On April 26, 1996, the USACE
issued a General Permit Verification for the use of Nationwide Permits 12, 14 & 26 for
impacts to 0.51 acres of waters at the area now know as Governors Village (Action ID
199503160 & 199600078).
DWQ Approval #1 (see attached) - On June 8, 1996, the DWQ issued approval for the
use of General Water Quality Certifications for impacts to 0.51 acres of waters (DWQ
Project No. 96-0362). Impacts maps provided in the original application dated April 10,
1996 are attached.
DWQ Approval 92 (see attached) - On October 18, 1996, the DWQ issued approval for
the use of General Water Quality Certifications for impacts to 3.889 acres of waters
(DWQ Project No. 96-0884). Impacts maps provided in the second application dated
September 5, 1996 are attached.
In a conversation with Todd Tugwelll of the USACE on February 9, 2005, we understand
that the USACE have documentation that the impacts proposed within the second
application dated September 5, 1996 have been approved but there is no copy of the
approval letter in their files. This application was submitted by S&EC. We have
searched our old files, but we have not been able to locate a copy of this letter.
GOVERNORS VILLAGE
PRIOR PROJECT HISTORY
USACE Letter of Unauthorized Activity I Permit Noncompliance (see attached) -
The USACE issued a letter of Notification of Unauthorized Activity / Permit
Noncompliance (Action ID 200520149) on December 27, 2004 for this development. In
this letter the USACE notified the owner that the construction of the road across a stream
was not authorized; that a permit had previously been authorized for impacts in the same
area (AID 199503160); that the permit had expired prior to the construction of the road;
and that the plans have been modified from the originally proposed plans. The remedial
action requested within this letter was for the owner to submit an "after-the-fact"
individual permit application for the stream impacts caused by the road and for any
additional fills within waters of the US for completion of the proposed project
(Governors Village).
County of Chatham Letter re: Stoinnwater Pond (see attached) - The Chatham
County Planning Director describes in this letter dated April 29, 2005 that the "Village
Pond" was previously approved by the County to meet the County Water Supply
Watershed stormwater requirements for Governors Village.

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington District
Action ID: c) 3 \? Q County:
Notification of Jurisdictional Determination
Property owner/Authorized Agent
Address ?C,, Mc (3?,C%VN , ?r C e c?s.c C 1h? C>h
J i
Telephone Number
Size and Location of Property(waterbody, Highway name/number, town, etc.)
o1k cc c.? C1 O? 6, c c G, t. o? Sc \oQ?? , ?' -r W o? SFZ ?`?a
Indicate Which of the following aPP1Y: ?" Cv e. 4 ?e acL w ?? e c s CA ' - n- e
?o Cab Cc eek,
• There are wetlands on the above described property which we strongly suggest should be delineated and
surveyed. The surveyed wetland lines must be verified by our staff before the Corps will make a final
jurisdictional determination on your property.
• Because of the size of your property and our present workload, our identification and delineation of your
wetlands cannot be accomplished in a timely manner. You may wish to employ a consultant to obtain a
more timely delineation of the wetlands. Once your consultant has flagged a wetland line on the property,
Corps staff will review it, and, if it is accurate, we strongly recommend that you have the line surveyed for
final approval by the Corps. The Corps will not make a final jurisdictional determination on your property
without an approved survey.
• The wetlands on your lot have been delineated, and the limits of Corps jurisdiction have been explained
to you. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied
upon for a period not to exceed years from the date of this notification.
• There are no wetlands present onthe above described property which are subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law
or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed three years
frorp the date of this notification.
• The project is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties. You should contact the nearest State Office of
Coastal Management to determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material in wetlands on this property without a Department of the Army
permit is in most cases a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1311). A permit is
not required for work on the property restricted entirely to existing high ground. If you have any
questions regarding the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please contact
n?cN \e_ at ""S `cyV 0 .
Property owner/Authorized Agent Signature
Project Manager
Date`` n ;Expiration Date ' \n,, \--\, QC)G C)
SURVEY PLAT OR FIELD SKETCH OF DESCRIBED PROPERTY AND THE WETLAND
DELINEATION FORM MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE YELLOW (FILE) COPY OF THIS FORM.
CESAW Form 566
1 OCT 92

_ ? 18
rl
¦
lot_
z
.
s
ow_
w
29 ?
¦
(?IoqV •w ` s CLok) V
??U?M? tJ cry
c r_ ?r- ? cP? ctl ?c1
ozo
0 No
W
F .
0
° ? N J
6
4
r
A r
r f
t 1 QQ? 17 N
E` Q
M„ 9£.101
,5g. Low
O -
E-
g
0
r
J
Q
`Q
V

l '
Q
Q
M
D
=u
U
N ID
cmcr
17
?r
i
ON a ,Ol'99t
n
d

CL
ry
O
Q
M
LiJ
y
J
z
O
Z
Z x
}
O
U

• ?~ .. .P. u.: .]~"A..Ln J.. re. r•ab'?. ?vY?rtlq? *? ?.
Memorandum
To: MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
CC:
From: Jean B. Manuele
Date: 'October 16, 1995
Subject: - Action ID. 199503160 and`. 199600078, Nationwide Permit
No. 26 Applicability to Subdivision for Governors Club
Limited Partnership, Polk and Dossett Tracts, South of
Chapel Hill, Chatham County, North Carolina.
On October 16, 1995, I contacted Mr. Joe Brinn, Jr. with Governors Club
Limited Partnership to inform him of our decision regarding the applicability of
Nationwide Permit No. 26 to the proposed development of Polk Tracts I, II
and III and the Dossett Tract, owned by the aforementioned partnership. Mr.
Brinn was informed that the developers would be allowed to apply for a
separate Nationwide Permit No. 26 for the Polk and Dossett Tracts since they
are located outside of the main Governors Club subdivision development and
will not be entitled to any of the amenities offered within the main
development. Accordingly, the acreage already issued by nationwide permit in
the main subdivision, 2.4 acres, would not be cumulatively affected by wetland
permits for the Polk and Dossett tracts. Mr 4Brinn stated that he had no
problem with this interpretation.
Jean B. Manuele

Regulatory Specialist
Raleigh Field,-Office

KIr
3 ;1to?? lob
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. 199503160 4 ft`'° County Chatham
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner/Agent Governors Club Development, ATTN: Mr. William J. Bri
Address 10100 Governors Drive
Chapel Hill. North Carolina 27514
Telephone No. - [phone]
Size and Location of project (waterway, road name/number, town, etc.) 223.696 acres west of
S.R. 1727 and east of S.R. 1008. approximately 5 miles south of Chapel Hill, N.C. The site is
located adjacent to, and above the headwaters of, several unnamed tributaries to Cub Creek
Description of Activity
Filling, flooding and excavation activities associated with the construction of stormwater ponds
utilities and roads within a proposed residential and commercial development Jurisdictional
impact totals are as follows: NWP No. 12-0.01 acre, NWP No. 14-0.05 acre and NWP No 26-
X Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344) only.
Section 10 (River and Harbor Act of 1899) -only.
. Section 404 and Section 10.
11 14 & 26 Nationwide Permit Number.
Any violation of the conditions of the Regional General or Nationwide Permit referenced above
may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, and/or appropriate legal
action.
This Department of the Army Regional General/Nationwide Permit verification does not relieve
the undersigned permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State, or
local approvals/permits. The permittee may need to contact appropriate State and local agencies
before beginning work.
Regulatory Project Manager Signatures
Date__ April 26.1996 Expiration

SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORM, ETC., MUST BE
ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
State of North Carolina I',
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources + • •
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary C) E I---1 N F=tp
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
June 8, 1996
Chatham County
DEM Project # 960362
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Mr. William Brinn
Governors Club Dev.
10100 Governors Drive
Chapel Hill, NC 27514
Dear Mr. Brinn:
You have our approval to place fill material in 0.51 acres of wetlands or waters for the purpose of
residential development, stormwater ponds utilities and roadways at The Polk and Dossett Tracts at
Governors Club Development, as you described in your application dated 10 April 1996. After reviewing
your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification
Numbers 3022, 2732 and 2671. These certifications allow you to use Nationwide Permit Numbers 12, 14
and 26 when they are issued by the Corps of Engineers.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you
change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. For this
approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification. Additional
written DEM approval is needed for the stormwater pond before construction begins. In addition, you
should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send
a written petition which conforms to Chapter 150E of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office
of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Environmental Management under Section 401
of the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-1786.
Sincerely,
ton Howar , r. P.E.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Raleigh DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Central Files
960362.1tr
Environmental Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
w
V w
Q p`,
V
v Q
0
N
u Q
z z
D
O
V
w 37
l'3 Q
Z =
Q ~
Q
V
D
z
Q
H
w
3
o?
wQ
z
HCY
LU V
T
(n Q
3 w a
°
Q
Q
Q

Q w
? OC
LL)
w? C) Q
U
U
ZQ J
QZ Q

O w W

3 1-
Z
wQ
U <
Z <

_
w

, V
Q
N

LU w
O

Q Q

O

J
Q J
U Q
X Z U
7w<
0 Q M
U vj?
w w ?D
O
Li

O

i3 ?iorUW)AO
?--IV ?.f ru a.._
?hu
1-9
i

r6
d
.Q
V
T
V

v
DATE: 04 APRIL
DESIGN BY: M P.A.
DRAWN BY rt.J.E-5
.r
v
Q
r
0
Q
Lf)
u1 uI
v ?
Q Q
v
LD r
0 0
i
w
flC
v
Q
m
0
m
0
F-ICIURE I
ZIL Ok
POLK PARCEL Ul
?E I NODIFIED
PLAN
Q
z
O
Q

O w ? ?
Q
? v Q
w

w
? V
zQ
Q
F- o
wa
3 ?.

300' 150' 0 300' 600'
SCALE: 1" = 300'