20060450 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20060316

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ©u -- 'DV' 50
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON. NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF.
CESAW-RG (1145-b) 31 May 2006
MEMORANDUM FOR Commanding General, Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, Attn: Mr.
Scott Brewer, PSC 20004, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina 28542
SUBJECT: Action ID No. 200600815, Department of the Army permit request
1. Please reference your request for a Department of the Army authorization and a State
Water Quality Certification to impact 83.06 acres of jurisdictional wetlands associated with
the development of a new weapons training range (SR-8) in the Greater Sandy Run Area
within Camp Lejeune, Onslow County, North Carolina.
2. In response to our 13 April 2006 Public Notice, we received three comments from the US
Fish and Wildlife Service, the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, and the US
Environmental Protection Agency (copies enclosed). Each agency expressed their concerns
regarding the amount of adverse impact to wetlands associated with the proposed weapons
training range.
3. Based on a review of your plans and accompanying documentation, we are unable, at this
time to make a determination that impacts to waters and wetlands have been avoided and
minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Specifically, sufficient information regarding
the need for the placement of fill material in all of the "general fill area" as shown on the
plans has not been provided to this office for review.
4. It appears that the basic project purpose may be accomplished by land clearing (e.g.
mowing) or minor drainage within the range. These alternatives will not only reduce
permanent wetland impacts but will reduce your mitigation requirements as well.
5. Our administrative process provides you the opportunity to propose a resolution and/or
rebut any and all objections and comments before a final decision is made. In this regard, any
information you have regarding the practicability of the alternatives identified above, or any
other measures that could reduce or eliminate impacts to wetlands associated with this
proposal should be provided, in writing, on or before July 1, 2006.
JUN 2 1 2006
t)ENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND ST0RMWATER BRANCH

WET11tMC5 !?Plt'' ??'Ck4!?Il?r:r ?_; t "t;»?J
CESAW-RG (1145-b)
SUBJECT: Action ID: 200600815, Department of the Army permit request
6. Mr. Brad Shaver of my Regulatory Division is responsible for processing your application.
If you have any questions or comments concerning this correspondence, please call Mr.
Shaver at [phone].
3 Encls JOHN E. PULLIAM, JR.?
Colonel, EN
Commanding
CF:
Ms. Becky Fox
Wetlands Regulatory Section - Region IV
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1349 Firefly Road
Whittier, North Carolina 28789
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Division of Water Quality
N.C Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
2321 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 20601-2260
Mr. John Hammond
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. Steven H. Everhart
N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission
1721 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1721
2

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
May 26, 2006
Mr. Brad Shaver
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
P. O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
RECOWD
MAY 3 0 2006
REGUI-ADTORY
%N. FM MIL avc.
Suloject: Action ID #2006008.115, Marine Corps Base Carnp Lejeune; SR-8 in Greater Sandy Run
Area, Onslow County, NC
Dear Mr. Shaver:
This letter provides the comments of the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) on the subject
Public Notice, dated April 13, 2006. The applicant, Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, has applied
for a Department of the Army (DA) permit to impact approximately 86 acres of jurisdictional
wetlands to construct a multi-purpose machine gun range, designated as SR-8. These comments are
submitted in accordance with the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA) (48 Stat. 401, as
amended; -'667d). Comments related to the FWCA are to be used in your
deterrrnnation of compliance with 404(b)(1) gnidelines'(40 CFR; 30) and m`your public uiterest
review (33 CF _320.4) in relation to the protection of fish and Wildlife resources.: Additional
comments are provided regarding the District Engineer's determination of project impacts pursuant to
section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543).
Project Area, Proposed Activities, and Environmental Impacts
I;
The project area is a 300-acre tract within the Greater Sandy Run Area (GSRA). The area is
undeveloped and forested and is located on a ridge separating the northern and southern portions of
the Great Sandy Run'Pocosin. Prior to acquisition of the area; the GSRA was intensively managed
for commercial timber production for 45 years. Wetlands on the site consist of forested areas (both
broad-leaved deciduous and needle-leave evergreen) and scrub-shrub areas.
The applicant proposes to construct a multi-purpose machine gun range on the site. Approximately
9.64 acres of wetlands would be filled to construct roads, buildings, targets, and firing positions. An
additional 76.36 acres of wetlands would remain vegetated, but would be maintained and mowed
within the range footprint. A "general fill area," presumably the 76-acre area, would be impacted by
land clearing and fill to create a ".consistent-grade across the range."
Compensatoty mitigation would be provided by at tfie Greater Sandy Run Wetland Mitigation Bank.
The 1?N states that'almosf 202 credits are avai1al;le within the bank The'AuJmber of credits to'6e
de?i'ted for therproposed work 1s not given
1.;.j,
Q t i VA04
OMCR BRA
2
Federally Protected Species
The Service has reviewed available information on federally-threatened or endangered species
known to occur in Onslow County. We have also reviewed information from the North Carolina
Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database which contains excellent data on the'special status
species, both federal and state. This database can be accessed by topographic quadrangle (quad) of
the U. S. Geological Survey (USGS). Data from USGS quads provide the most project-specific
information on species which should be considered in permitting this project. The project area is in
the Folkstone quad. The occurrence data of special status species within this quad can be obtained on
the internet under the heritage data link of < http://www.ncthp.oriz/Pages/herita-acdata.htrnl >.
The two species of greatest concern are the red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) (RCW)
and rough-leaved loosestrife (RLL) (Lysiraachia asperulifolia). Both are listed as endangered. The
applicant has stated that there have been no sightings of the RCW on the GSRA. Similarly, the
NCNHP contains no records of the species in the Folkstone quad or in the immediate vicinity of SR-
8. The NCNHP database for the Folkstone quad does have a current record for RLL in the Folkstone
quad, but no documented occurrences near the site. The PN states that a "high probability habitat
survey" by the natural resource staff of the base did not observe RLL.
Based on information from the applicant and the NCNHP, the Service concludes that these two
species are not likely to be present in the project area. Therefore, the Service would concur with a
determination by the District Engineer that the action is not likely to adversely affect species
designated as threatened, endangered, or their designated critical habitat. However, the requirement
of section 7 would need to be reconsidered if. (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified
action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this
action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new
species is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
Service Concerns and Recommendations
The Service supports creating adequate training facilities for the applicant. However, we wish to
ensure that all feasible measures are taken to avoid and minimize the adverse environmental impacts
associated with constructing these facilities.
The Service is concerned that a permanent reduction in wetland area would be detrimental to fish and
wildlife resources. Wetlands in the project area can have high value as wildlife habitat. These
wetlands, even when recovering from timber harvesting, can provide moist foraging habitat for
reptiles and amphibians. Small, isolated pools in wetlands can provide critical breeding habitat for
frogs, toads, and salamanders. The wetlands can also provide important habitat for many species of
birds.. These areas serve as breeding habitat, migratory rest areas, and overwintering areas for a
variety of birds.
The Corps' public interest review should consider whether SR-8 could be placed elsewhere within
the GSRA and constructed with less wetland impacts. An April 1996 report on the mitigation bank
by Dewberry and Davis stated (p. 1) that over four decades of commercial forestry on the 41,000-
acre site had left the majority of the GSRA ditched, drained and dominated by pine plantations at
4
3
various stages of development. The Corps should determine whether there is a less damage site for
this 300-acre range within the 41,000 acres of the GSRA. An area which had been previously
ditched/drained and occupied by a young, commercial pine plantation could be used for this facility
with much less adverse environmental impacts.
Regardless of where the range is located, there should be greater discussion of the need for filling
wetlands outside the built upon areas to create a "consistent grade across the site." The topographic
map included in the PN (Figure 2) indicates a fairly flat site for the range. Except for a small area
above the 20-foot contour, most of the site is between the 20-foot and 16-foot contour line. While
some removal of trees would be necessary to clear lines-of-fire, it is not clear why wetland areas
would be filled throughout the range. If there are old drainage ditches within the range, these could
be filled without affecting the wetland aspects of the area.
There should be a discussion of the credits which would be debited from the mitigation bank.
Restored areas which are fully successful, such as scrub-shrub areas, could be debiting at a lower
ratio than wetlands, such as forested wetlands, which require many years to become fully functional.
The vegetative characteristics and location of the mitigation wetlands should be considered by the
Corps in determining the adequacy of compensation.
Overall, a functional wetland mitigation bank does not eliminate the need to demonstrate rigorous
avoidance and minimization of impacts to Waters of the United States. There should be compelling
evidence that the proposed range could not be built on young pine plantation area which had been
previously ditched and drained. Similarly, it may be possible to eliminate the need for wetland fill to
create a consistent grade across the area which appears to berelatively flat. After all avoidance and
minimization measures have been employed, the existing wetland mitigation bank should be debited
in a manner to provide functional replacement of the habitat values to be lost.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to comment on this permit application. If you have
questions regarding these comments, please contact Howard Hall at 919-856-4520, ext. 27 or by e-
mail at < howad-hall@fws..gov >.
Services Supervisor.
cc: Rebecca Fox, US EPA, Whittier, NC
Steve Everhart, NCWRC, Wilmington, NC
Joanne Steenhuis, NC Division of Water Quality, Wilmington, NC
Doug Huggett, NC Division of Coastal Management, Morehead City, NC
® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Richard B. Hamilton, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Brad E. Shaver
USACE
FROM: Steven H. Everhart, PhD, CWB ,?^4tgl`_
Southeastern Permit Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: April 25, 2006
SUBJECT: Public Notice Action ID # 200600815 for Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune (MCB CL) SR-8
Multipurpose Machine Gun (MPMG) Range, Onslow County.
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) reviewed the permit application with
regard to impacts on fish and wildlife resources. Our comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the
Coastal Area Management Act (G.S. 113A-100 through 113A-128), as amended, and the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.).
The 300 acre project site is located at west of US 17, north of Moore's Road and lies in the portion of MCB CL
referred to as the Greater Sandy Run Area (GSRA). The site is adjacent o the Great Sandy Run Pocosin, a tributary
to Shelter Swamp Creek, ultimately a tributary to the Northeast Cape Fear River. The waters of the area are
classified as C-Sw by the NC Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ).
In order to create a modern MPMG Range, the applicant proposes to impact up to 86.03 acres of non-riparian
wetlands. The areas of compacted fill serving as the foundation for targets, roads, buildings, and firing positions
totals approximately 10 acres. Approximately 76 acres will remain as vegetated areas to be mowed and maintained
within the range footprint.
NCWRC has the following concerns with the project as proposed.
• Although there are mitigation units available in the GRSA mitigation bank, 86 acres of impact on a 300
acre site for a single project seems not to have included a great deal of minimization or alternatives
analysis. We recommend these are more fully investigated in future documents related to this project
We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this permit application. If you need further assistance or
additional information, please contact Steve Everhart at [phone].
CC: Cyndi Karoly, NCDWQ
Joanne Steenhuis, NCDWQ
Howard Hall, USFWS
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Shaver, Brad E SAW
From: [e-mail]
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 8:49 AM
To: Shaver, Brad E SAW
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Camp Lejeune PN
Hi Brad,
I have not had time to write a formal letter on the Camp Lejeune new weapons training
range project but wanted to send you a brief email to reiterate my thoughts from our
conversation last week. Although I understand the importance of the project from a
national security perspective, we are concerned the Marine Corps is proposing to impact
83.06 acres of wetlands for project construction with apparently no attempt to avoid and
minimize impacts. We recommend the applicant revisit the project plans to see if there is
a way to reduce the impacts to wetlands. We agree with you, one way to potentially do
this may be
to make some of the areas less wet than they currently are. This may
be an opportunity for some of the areas to maintain their wetland status (although change
in type) so they will not interfere with the training operations. If the decision is made
to minimize impacts to some areas with this method, we recommend mitigation for the change
in type but at a reduced rate from what would be required from eliminating the wetlands in
these areas. It appears the Greater Sandy Run Area Mitigation Bank will have adequate
credits available to mitigate for the proposed impact. Let me know if you would like to
further discuss this project.
Thanks, Becky
Becky Fox
Wetland Regulatory Section
USEPA
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
1
or?
?QF W A I - Michael F. Easley, Governor
w
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
>_
p Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
June 7, 2006
Mr. Scott Brewer
Marine Corps Base
PSC Box 20004
Camp Lejeune, NC 28542
Re: Machine Gun Range - Greater Sandy Run Area
Onslow County
DWQ #060450; USACE Action ID. No. 200600815
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification
Dear Mr. Brewer:
Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No. 3575 issued to the Mr. Scott Brewer and the United States
Marine Corps, dated June 7, 2006. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits
before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Solid Waste, Sediment and Erosion
Control, Stormwater, Dam Safety, Non-discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us.
Sin ly,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AWK/cbk/ijm
Attachments: Certificate of Completion
cc: Becky Fox, EPA - Region 4,1307 Firefly Road, Whittier, NC 28789
Brad Shaver, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Wilmington District, USACOE
Noelle Lutheran, DWQ, Wilmington Regional Office
Janet Russell, DLR Wilmington Regional Office
Stephen Rynas, Division of Coastal Management, Morehead City
File Copy
Central Files
Martin Korenek, Marine Corps Base, PSC Box 2004, Camp Lejeune, NC 28542
Filename: 060450MachineGa uRa ngeGreaterSandyRunArea (Onslow)401_IC
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
NortthCarolina
AWN17lly
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Mr. Scott Brewer and the United States Marine Corps a?
Page 2 of 3
June 7, 2006
NORTH CAROLINA 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401 Public Laws 92-
500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
Regulations in 15 NCAC 2H, Section .0500 to Mr. Scott Brewer and the United States Marine Corps to fill
or otherwise impact 86.03 acres of non-riparian wetland (9.64 acres identified for proposed fill, 76.39 acres
identified for proposed clearing and cutting) in the White Oak River Basin, associated with the construction
of a modern multi-purpose machine gun range and service roads in Onslow County, North Carolina,
pursuant to an application filed on the 17th day of March of 2006, and in additional correspondence
received March 20, 2006.
The application and supporting documentation provides adequate assurance that the proposed work will
not result in a violation of applicable Water Quality Standards and discharge guidelines. Therefore, the
State of North Carolina certifies that this activity will not violate the applicable portions of Sections 301,
302, 303, 306, 307 of PL 92-500 and PL 95-217 if conducted in accordance with the application, the
supporting documentation, and conditions hereinafter set forth.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design submitted in the application materials and as
described in the Public Notice. If the project is changed, prior to notification a new application for a new
Certification is required. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification
and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions of this Certification. Any
new owner must notify the Division and request the Certification be issued in their name. Should wetland
or stream fill be requested in the future, additional compensatory mitigation may be required as described
in 15A NCAC 214.0506 (h) (6) and (7). If any plan revisions from the approved site plan result in a
change in stream or wetland impact or an increase in impervious surfaces, the DWQ shall be notified in
writing and a new application for 401 Certification may be required. For this approval to be valid,
compliance with the conditions listed below is required.
Conditions of Certification:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:
Amount Approved
(Units) Plan Location or Reference
Stream N/A (feet)
404 Wetlands 86.03 (acres, 9.64
acres fill, 76.39 acres
clearing and cutting) Project Boundary "A" & "B"
Waters N/A (acres)
Buffers N/A (square ft.)
Sediment and Erosion Control:
2. Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing
the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in
order to protect surface waters standards:
06,
lvll. uw« JL3tcvvct anu mr, ummu aiatus iviarine t_.vrps
Page 3 of 3
June 7, 2006
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the
North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion
control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified
in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and
waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits
associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the
North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in
accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
3. No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the
footprint of the impacts depicted in the 404/401 Permit Application. All construction activities,
including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best
Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards,
statutes, or rules occur;
4. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent
practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is
unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that the
Division of Land Resources has released the project;
Continuing Compliance:
5. Mr. Scott Brewer and the United States Marine Corps, shall conduct construction activities in a
manner consistent with State water quality standards (including any requirements resulting from
compliance with section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act) and any other appropriate requirements of
State law and federal law. If the Division determines that such standards or laws are not being met
(including the failure to sustain a designated or achieved use) or, that State or federal law is being
violated, or that further conditions are necessary to assure compliance, the Division may reevaluate
and modify this Certification to include conditions appropriate to assure compliance with such
standards and requirements in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0507(d). Before modifying the
Certification, the Division shall notify Mr. Scott Brewer and the United States Marine Corps and the
US Army Corps of Engineers, provide public notice in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0503 and
provide opportunity for public hearing in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0504. Any new or revised
conditions shall be provided to Mr. Scott Brewer and/or the United States Marine Corps in writing,
shall be provided to the United States Army Corps of Engineers for reference in any Permit issued
pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and shall also become conditions of the 404 Permit
for the project;
Mitigation:
6. Compensatory Mitigation Using a Mitigation Bank
Mitigation must be provided for the proposed impacts as specified in the table below. We
understand that you intend to purchase credits from the Greater Sandy Run Wetland Mitigation
Bank in Onslow County as described in your application to meet this mitigation requirement.
Mr. Scott Brewer and the United States Marine Corps
Page 4 of 3
June 7, 2006
Our records show that the Greater Sandy Run Wetland Mitigation Bank in Onslow County is
available for credit release for your project. This contribution has been determined by the DWQ
to be a suitable method to meet the mitigation requirement. Until the Greater Sandy Run Wetland
Mitigation Bank receives and clears your check, and proof of payment has been provided to this
Office, no impacts specified in this Authorization Certificate shall occur. For accounting
purposes, this Authorization Certificate authorizes payment into the Greater Sandy Run
Wetland Mitigation Bank to meet the following compensatory mitigation requirement:
Compensatory Mitigation
Required River and Sub-basin Number
Stream N/A (feet) N/A
Wetlands 129.05 acres ocossin/ ine flat Cape Fear/03030007
Waters N/A (acres) N/A
Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as
depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If this Certification is unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written
request within sixty (60) days following receipt of this Certification. This request must be in the form of a
written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes and filed with the
Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. If
modifications are made to an original Certification, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing on the
modifications upon written request within sixty (60) days following receipt of the Certification. Unless
such demands are made, this Certification shall be final and binding.
AWK/cbk/?m
This the 7"` day of June,
ION W E ALITY
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
3575
M o
iJS Army Corps PUBLIC NOTICE
Of Engineers
Wilmington District
Issue Date: April 13, 2006
Comment Deadline: May 15, 2006
Corps Action ID: 200600815
The Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers (Corps) has received an application from
U.S. Marine Corp Base-Camp Lejeune is seeking Department of the Army
authorization to impact 83.06 acres of jurisdictional wetlands associated with the
development of a new weapons training range in the Greater Sandy Run Area, Onslow
County, North Carolina.
Specific plans and location information are described below and shown on the attached
plans. This Public Notice and all attached plans are also available on the Wilmington
District Web Site at www.saw.usace.army.mil/wetlands
Applicant: Marine Corp Base, Camp Lejeune
Attn: Scott Brewer
PSC Box 20004
Camp Lejeune, North Carolina 28542
AGENT (if applicable):
Marine Corp Base, Camp Lejeune
Attn: Martin Korenek
PSC Box 20004
Camp Lejeune, North Carolina 28542
Authority
APR 1 7 2006
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
The Corps will evaluate this application and a decide whether to issue, conditionally
issue, or deny the proposed work pursuant to applicable procedures of Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344).
Location
The 300 acre project site is located west of US Hwy 17/ North of Moores Road and lies
in the portion of Marine Corp Base Camp Lejeune referred to as the Greater Sand Run
Area (GSRA) in Onslow County. The site is adjacent to the Great Sandy Run Pocosin, a
tributary to Shelter Swamp Creek, ultimately a tributary to the Northeast Cape Fear
River. The site can be located at 34° 36.59' N and 77°30.73' W.
Existing Site Conditions
The project location is dominated by a series of southern pine forests of various age
classes. Prior to acquisition by the USMC, the GSRA was intensively managed for high
volume commercial timber production for about 45 years.
SOILS
Soils at the GSRA are comprised primarily of loamy fine sands and fine sands.
Five soil types are mapped in the project area. Two non-hydric soils occurring on project
site include Foreston loamy fine sand (FoA) and Stallings loamy fine sand (St). Three
soils listed as hydric soils by the National Technical Committee on Hydric Soils (USDA,
Soil Conservation Service [SCS] 1991) occur on the site. These include: Leon fine sand
(Le), Torhunta fine sandy loam (To), and Woodington loamy fine sand (Wo) (Figure 3).
These soils are influenced by seasonally high water tables and typically have a high
organic content and small particle size. A branch of Shelter Swamp Creek, a tributary of
the Cape Fear River Basin lies to the north of the project area.
NATURAL COMMUNITIES
The site is currently undeveloped and forested. It is located on a ridge that
separates the Great Sandy Run Pocosin into a northern pocosin and a southern pocosin.
Natural communities of the area were identified and classified into two broad categories;
upland and wetland communities. The upland communities found in the project area
most closely resemble the Mesic Pine Flatwoods community described by Schafale and
Weakley (1990). Two variants occur: planted pine monocultures and naturally
regenerated, managed, mixed pine forests.
UPLANDS
Planted pine monocultures areas are characterized by a dominant loblolly pine
(Pinus taeda) canopy. Depending on the age of the individual stands and the frequency
of occurrence of fire, these woodlands may have anything from a sparse understory to a
dense understory. Common understory species include sweet gum (Liquidambar
styraciflua), horse sugar (Symplocos tinctoria), blackberries (Rubus spp.), common
greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia), and bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum).
WETLANDS
Two classes of non-riparian wetlands, palustrine forested and scrub-shrub
wetlands, (based upon the Cowardin classification system, Cowardin et al. 1979), can be
found in the SR-8 project area.
Palustrine forests are further broken down into five subclasses, of which two were
identified at SR-8: broad-leaved deciduous forests (PFO 1) and needle-leaved evergreen
forests (PF04). Broad-leaved deciduous wetlands are generally dominated by tree species
such as red maple, black gum (Nyssa sylvatica), and sweet gum. Mid-story of this
subclass is comprised of red bay, sweet bay (Magnolia virginiana), ironwood (Carpinus
caroliniana), and American holly (Ilex opaca). The needle-leaved evergreen canopy is
dominated by pond pine and loblolly pine, with a mid-canopy similar to the broad-leaved
2 Version 12/12/05
deciduous wetland. These subclasses both share similar shrub layers of highbush
blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum), titi (Cyrila racemiflora), wax myrtle (Myrica
cerifera), inkberry (Ilex glabra), fetterbush (Lyonia lucida) and sweet pepperbush
(Clethra alnifolia).
Two of the five subclasses of scrub-shrub wetlands can be found within the SR-8
site: scrub-shrub broad-leaved evergreen (SS3) and scrub-shrub needle-leaved evergreen
(SS4). Broad-leaved evergreen scrub-shrub wetlands have organic soils and dominant
species include titi, fetterbush, inkberry, and evergreen bayberry (Myrica heterophylla).
Needle-leaved evergreen scrub-shrub wetlands are generally composed of young or
stunted pond pine or loblolly pine. Several fern species populate this herb layer including
netted chain fern (Woodwardia areolata), royal fern (Osmunda regalis), cinnamon fern
(Osmunda cinnamomea), sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis) and bracken fern. The size
and species composition of these areas is an estimate based upon a review of aerial
photography and field observations.
Applicant's Stated Purpose
The applicant's stated purpose is to build a modern multi-purpose machine gun range to
replace the antiquated existing machine gun ranges with the Base. The Marine Corps's
mission is to provide the most effective fighting force possible in a rapidly changing
world accented by asymmetrical warfare and the continuing global war on terrorism.
Project Description
Building and operating the SR-8 Range will cause unavoidable impacts to wetlands due
to mechanized land clearing, cutting, and filling required for the construction of roads,
facilities, target emplacements, buildings, and other infrastructure.
Construction of the MPMG Range may require impacting (clearing, cutting, and filling)
up to 86.03 acres of non-riparian wetlands (Table 1). The areas of compacted fill serving
as the foundations for targets, roads, buildings and firing positions totals 9.64 acres
(Table 2). 76.39 acres will remain as vegetated areas to be mowed and maintained within
the range footprint. The general fill area will see a combination of cutting and filling to
create a consistent grade across the range. To establish the desired grade through the
range as much as a meter of fill would be placed in areas. See designs attached.
Version 12/12/05
• .,
.- .
' ?127400 ,0

61293 • -A

4649 t •
.-
1371334 -.4 1

2164542

164178
.
31.48
- 100101 46320 1830 1077487 1635775 64626 24.74
- 580 92 0 6243 3249 0 0.14
' ?54121 18995 988 582558 670802 34891 13.37
- 65930 20239 322 709671 714734 11371 16.29
• 86.03
Table 1. Summary of proposed wetland impacts/general fill at SR-8. Information provided by U.S. Army
Engineering and Support Center, Huntsville, Alabama.
- ?20305 12086 218566 426813 15808 5.02
' 8703 1715 93681 60565 2243 2.15
- 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
- ?3178 990 34206 34962 1295 0.79
- 6831 1189 73531 41989 1555 1.69
• 9.64
Tahla 2 C„mmarv nfnrnnnser l emmnaeterl fill areas at SR-8. information provid ed by U.S. Armv
Engineering and Support Center, Huntsville, Alabama.
Compensatory mitigation for this proposed project will be provided with credits from the
Greater Sandy Run Area Wetland Mitigation Bank. To date there are 201.91 credits
available for use within the Bank while another 565.1 credits awaiting final approval.
Other Required Authorizations
This notice and all applicable application materials are being forwarded to the appropriate
State agencies for review. The Corps will generally not make a final permit decision
until the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) issues, denies, or waives
State certification required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (PL 92-500). The
receipt of the application and this public notice in the NCDWQ Central Office in Raleigh
serves as application to the NCDWQ for certification. A waiver will be deemed to occur
4 Version 12/12/05
if the NCDWQ fails to act on this request for certification within sixty days of the date of
the receipt of this notice in the NCDWQ Central Office. Additional information
regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be reviewed at the NCDWQ Central
Office, 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit, 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Raleigh,
North Carolina 27604-2260. All persons desiring to make comments regarding the
application for certification under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act should do so in
writing delivered to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ), 1650 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 Attention: Ms Cyndi Karoly by
May 6, 2006.
The applicant has not provided to the Corps, a certification statement that his/her
proposed activity complies with and will be conducted in a manner that is consistent with
the approved North Carolina Coastal Zone Management Program. Pursuant to 33 CFR
325.2(b)(2), the Corps can not issue a permit for the proposed work until the applicant
submits such a certification to the Corps and the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management (NCDCM), and the NCDCM notifies the Corps that it concurs with the
applicant's consistency certification.
Essential Fish Habitat
This notice initiates the Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) consultation requirements of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. The Corps' initial
determination is that the proposed project will not adversely impact EFH or associated
fisheries managed by the South Atlantic or Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Councils
or the National Marine Fisheries Service.
Cultural Resources
The Corps has consulted the latest published version of the National Register of Historic
Places and is not aware that any registered properties, or properties listed as being
eligible for inclusion therein are located within the project area or will be affected by the
proposed work. Presently, unknown archeological, scientific, prehistoric, or historical
data may be located within the project area and/or could be affected by the proposed
work.
Endangered Species
The Corps has reviewed the project area, examined all information provided by the
applicant and consulted the latest North Carolina Natural Heritage Database. According
to Camp Lejeune natural resource staff no occurrences of Rough-leaved loosestrife were
observed during a high probability habitat survey. Also according to the applicant, there
have been no sightings of red-cockaded woodpeckers within the GSRA area. Based on
available information, the Corps is not aware of the presence of species listed as
threatened or endangered or their critical habitat formally designated pursuant to the
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) within the project area. A final determination on
the effects of the proposed project will be made upon additional review of the project and
5 Version 12/12/05
completion of any necessary biological assessment and/or consultation with the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service and/or National Marine Fisheries Service."
Evaluation
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable
impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity on the public interest.
That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of
important resources. The benefit which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the
proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors
which may be relevant to the proposal will be considered including the cumulative effects
thereof; among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental
concerns, wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, flood plain
values (in accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use, navigation, shoreline
erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy
needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property
ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving
the discharge of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, the evaluation of
the impact of the activity on the public interest will include application of the
Environmental Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) guidelines.
Commenting Information
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local
agencies and officials, including any consolidate State Viewpoint or written position of
the Governor; Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate
the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the
Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for
this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on
endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects and
the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an
Environmental Assessment (EA) and/or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Comments are also used to
determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the
proposed activity.
Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice,
that a public hearing be held to consider the application. Requests for public hearings
shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. Requests for a
public hearing shall be granted, unless the District Engineer determines that the issues
raised are insubstantial or there is otherwise no valid interest to be served by a hearing.
Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will be received
by the Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, until 5pm, May 15, 2006. Comments
should be submitted to Brad Shaver, Regulatory Specialist at [phone].
6 Version 12/12/05
UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
MARINE CORPS BASE
PSC Box 200
Camp Lejeune, North Car D IN REPLY REFER TO:
5090.11.2
MAR 16 2006 BEMD
RFC L -- ,Y 5 LIAR 2006
From: Commanding Officer, Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune
To: Commanding Officer, United States Army Corps of
Engineers, Wilmington District 69 Darlington Avenue,
Wilmington, NC 28403
Subj: APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT FOR THE
MULTI-PURPOSE MACHINE GUN (MPMG) RANGE SR-8 WITHIN THE
GREATER SANDY RUN AREA (GSRA) OF MARINE CORPS BASE (MCB),
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA)
Encl: (1) Application for Department of the Army Permit for the
Multi-Purpose Machine Gun (MPMG) Range SR-8 (MILCON
P-034) within the Greater Sandy Run Area
(2) Final Environmental Assessment for Construction and
Operation of a Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range in the
Greater Sandy Run Area at Marine Corps Base Camp
Lejeune, North Carolina, January 2006.
(3) Advanced Final Range Compatible Use Zone (RCUZ) Study
Update for Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North
Carolina, February 2006.
1. The enclosures are submitted for your review and approval of
the proposed Multi-Purpose Machine Gun (MPMG) Range SR-8 (MILCON
P-034) located within the Greater Sandy Run Area on Marine Corps
Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina.
2. Camp Lejeune proposes to mechanically clear, cut, and fill
86.03 acres of non-riparian, freshwater wetlands to complete the
project described in the permit application. Camp Lejeune
proposes to mitigate unavoidable wetland impacts with wetland
mitigation credits from the GSRA Wetland Mitigation Bank.
3. The point of contact for this project is Mr. Martin Korenek,
Environmental Conservation Branch, Environment and Installations
Department, at telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
SCOTT A. REWER, PE
Director, Environmental Management
By direction of
the Commanding Officer
CC:
NCDENR, DWQ, 401 Section, without enclosures
NCDENR, DCM, without enclosures
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT I OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-0003
133 CFR 325) Expires December 31, 2004
The Public burden for this collection of information is sestimated to average 10 hours per response, although the majority of applications should require
5 hours or less. This includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of
information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of Information
Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget,
Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC 20503. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law,
no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control
number. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having
jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: River and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection , Research and
Sanctuaries Act, 33 USC 1413, Section 103. Principal Purpose: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application for a
permit. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies.
Submission of requested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit
be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this
application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed
activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned.
1. APPLICATION NO. 12. FIELD OFFICE CODE 13. DATE RECEIVED 14. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
/?FMC RFI nW Tn RF FII I Fn RV APPI IdaAM
5. APPLICANT'S NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (an awnt is not required)
Mr. Scott Brewer Martin Korenek - Permit POC
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS
Marine Corps Base, PSC Box 20004 Marine Corps Base, PSC Box 20004
Camp Lejeune, NC 28542 Camp Lejeune, NC 28542
7.. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE 10. AGENT'S PHONE NOS. W /AREA CODE
.a. Residence NA a. Residence NA
b. Business 910-451-5003 b. Business POC 910-451-7235
11, STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
I hereby authorize, NA to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to
furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE
NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (seeinstructions?
Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range, Greater Sandy Run Area (MILCON No. P-034)
13. NAME OF WATERBODY. IF KNOWN iilaarvi_htaj
Shelter Swamp Creek
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Onslow North Carolina
14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS /N app`cwb )
Greater Sandy Run Area Training Complex
(located west of US Hwy. 17)
COUNTY STATE 4
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN, Iseeinstructionsl
MCB Camp Lejeune
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
Take US 17N from Wilmington to Holly Ridge. GSRA is bounded by US 17 on the east and south,
NC 50 on the west and south, and highways 1104 and 1107 on the north. Map of project areas
is provided.
ENG R 4345, Jul 97 EDITION OF FEB 94 IS OBSOLETE. (Proponent: CECW-OR)
18. Nature of Activity iDesc pno„otpoiwt in mballfwtr )
Construction of a Machine Gun Range complex including a control tower, field service head,
operations storage building, general instruction building, ammunition breakdown building,
covered bleacher enclosure and covered meal area. The complex would also include a vehicle
holding area, Battle Site Zero area, a bivouac area, maneuver areas, training areas, target
emplacements, an emergency range shutdown system, telephone distribution system, secondary
rower distribution svstem, data distribution svstem. and a ranae warnina/sianal flaanole.
19. Project Purpose wesalbe the reason or pspo se of rte proiea, see irurnrctionsl
Build a modern Multi-purpose Machine Gun Range Complex with required ancillary facilities
and utilities.
USE BLOCKS 20-221F DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
Cutting and filling is required to provide site locations for buildings, target locations,
access roads, utilities, and clear, maintained fields of fire for the range.
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Tvoe in Cubic Yards
Structural fill (clean and free of pollutants) and pavements, (stone/gravel/sand/concrete)
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled fseelnstrucriomi
86.03 acres of non-riparian wetlands. See details in attached narrative.
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes No X IF YES. DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (if more than can be entered here,
please attach a supplemental list).
This project is confined to locations within the boundaries of the Greater Sandy Run Area,
Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune.
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL' IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
NCDWQ 401 Sec 401 Cert
NCDCM Fed Consist.
NCDENR Erosion Ctrl.
NCDENR Stormwater
'Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building and flood plain permits
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this
ap "anon is comple and accurate. I further certify that 1 possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the
d a?fhorize gen the applicant.
SIGNATURE IF: APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than 510,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
SR-8 Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range (MILCON P-034)
PROJECT NARRATIVE
March 2006
Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune
Greater Sandy Run Area
INTRODUCTION
The US Marine Corps (USMC) proposes to construct and operate a Multi-Purpose Machine Gun
(MPMG) Range SR-8 within the Greater Sandy Run Area (GSRA) of Marine Corps Base (MCB), Camp
Lejeune, North Carolina.
The Marine Corps's mission is to provide the most effective fighting force possible in a rapidly
changing world accented by asymmetrical warfare and the continuing global war on terrorism. In 2005,
Congress approved an additional 3,000 personnel for the Marine Corps in its 2005 Department of Defense
Authorization Act. Subsequently, the USMC decided that 2,100 out of the 3,000 authorized personnel
were going to be stationed at Camp Lejeuene. The Force Structure Review Group then developed
initiatives for the Marine Corps that include creation of additional infantry battalions and an increase in
the number of light-armored vehicle mounted infantry units. These changes have resulted in the approval
of five Military Construction Projects (MMCON) proposed for implementation to accommodate the
training needs of this planned influx of personnel; increased operational tempo and standup of the Marine
Special Operations Command (MARSOC).
MCB Camp Lejeune needs to build and operate the MPMG SR-8 range to provide the necessary
facilities for Marine Corps as well as other military units to maintain their combat readiness. Existing
live-fire machine gun ranges at MCB Camp Lejeune are antiquated and inadequate for today's weapons.
They no longer adequately support all of the modern, medium and heavy machine-gun training
requirements for both the School of Infantry (SOI) where Marines receive entry level training, and the 11
Marine Expeditionary Force (II MEF) combat units where annual sustainment and enhancement training
is required. The purpose of this project is to construct the first of 3 planned, modern ranges that provide:
• The most realistic and safe combat training-range for machine gun teams and snipers now using
modern, advanced weapons.
• A range that would support live-fire and maneuvering of both ground and vehicle mounted
machine guns including firing lanes that support vehicle "move and shoot" training.
• Static and moving electronic targets (reactive targets) that would provide realism as well as
performance feedback.
• Thermal image blankets on reactive targets to accommodate thermal sights on modern machine
guns and sniper rifles.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The 121 ha (300 acre) project site is located west of US Hwy 17 and lies in the portion of Marine
Corps Base Camp Lejeune referred to as the Greater Sandy Run Area (GSRA) in Onslow County, NC
(Figures 1 and 2). The Department of Defense purchased the 16,592 ha (41,000 ac) tract of land known.
as the GSRA for MCB Camp Lejeune in 1992. State Road 50 bounds the GSRA on the southwest and
west, and Padgett, Haws Run, Dawson Cabin, and High Hill Roads bound the property to the north,
excluding some out parcels along the northern and western perimeter.
The GSRA is dominated by a series of southern pine forests of various age classes. Prior to
acquisition by the USMC, the GSRA was intensively managed for high volume commercial timber
production for about 45 years.
The GSRA also includes portions of a former World War H Army Training facility at Camp
Davis, located at the southern end near the Town of Holly Ridge.
SOILS
Soil types for the GSRA were determined using the Onslow County Soil Survey (USDA 1992).
Soils at the GSRA are comprised primarily of loamy fine sands and fine sands. Five soil types are
mapped in the project area. Two non-hydric soils occurring on project site include Foreston loamy fine
sand (FoA) and Stallings loamy fine sand (St). Urban lands on site were identified as existing, improved
roads. Three soils listed as hydric soils by the National Technical Committee on Hydric Soils (USDA,
Soil Conservation Service [SCS] 1991) occur on the site. These include: Leon fine sand (Le), Torhunta
fine sandy loam (To), and Woodington loamy fine sand (Wo) (Figure 3). These soils are influenced by
seasonally high water tables and typically have a high organic content and small particle size. Land
around the project site is. managed forest land used for military training. A branch of Shelter Swamp
Creek, a tributary of the Cape Fear River Basin lies to the north of the project area.
NATURAL COMMUNITIES
The site is currently undeveloped and forested (Figure 4). It is located on a ridge that separates
the Great Sandy Run Pocosin into a northern pocosin and a southern pocosin. Natural communities of the
area were identified and classified into two broad categories; upland and wetland communities. The
upland communities found in the project area most closely resemble the Mesic Pine Flatwoods
community described by Schafale and Weakley (1990). Two variants occur: planted pine monocultures
and naturally regenerated, managed, mixed pine forests.
UPLANDS
Planted pine monocultures areas are characterized by a dominant loblolly pine (Pinus taeda)
canopy. Depending on the age of the individual stands and the frequency of occurrence of fire, these
woodlands may have anything from a sparse understory to a dense understory. Common understory
species include sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua), horse sugar (Symplocos tinctoria), blackberries
(Rubus spp.), common greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia), and bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum).
The mixed-pine woodlands community type is dominated by loblolly pine with individuals of
longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) and pond pine (Pinus serotina) scattered throughout. Common associates
in this type are sweetgum, red maple (Acer rubrum), and red bay (Persea borbonia). Shrub and herb
layers are sparse to moderate in density. Maintenance of this community type is aided by prescribed fire.
In those communities where fire is frequent, wire grass (Aristida stricta) dominates the herbaceous layer,
with bracken fern also very common in patches. Where fire is less frequent, various panic grasses
(Panicum spp.), broomsedges (Andropogon spp.), and paspalums (Paspalum spp.) dominate the
herbaceous layer.
2
WETLANDS
Two classes of non-riparian wetlands, palustrine forested and scrub-shrub wetlands, (based upon
the Cowardin classification system, Cowardin et al. 1979), can be found in the SR-8 project area.
Palustrine forests are further broken down into five subclasses, of which two were identified at
SR-8: broad-leaved deciduous forests (PF01) and needle-leaved evergreen forests (PF04). Broad-leaved
deciduous wetlands are generally dominated by tree species such as red maple, black gum (Nyssa
sylvatica), and sweet gum. Mid-story of this subclass is comprised of red bay, sweet bay (Magnolia
virginiana), ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana), and American holly (Ilex opaca). The needle-leaved
evergreen canopy is dominated by pond pine and loblolly pine, with a mid-canopy similar to the broad-
leaved deciduous wetland. These subclasses both share similar shrub layers of highbush blueberry
(Vaccinium corymbosum), titi (Cyrila racemiflora), wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), inkberry (Ilex glabra),
fetterbush (Lyonia lucida) and sweet pepperbush (Clethra alnifolia).
Two of the five subclasses of scrub-shrub wetlands can be found within the SR-8 site: scrub-
shrub broad-leaved evergreen (SS3) and scrub-shrub needle-leaved evergreen (SS4). Broad-leaved
evergreen scrub-shrub wetlands have organic soils and dominant species include titi, fetterbush, inkberry,
and evergreen bayberry (Myrica heterophylla). Needle-leaved evergreen scrub-shrub wetlands are
generally composed of young or stunted pond pine or loblolly pine. Both of these scrub-shrub
communities at the proposed site contain young. tree species, as well as a defined shrub stratum and
herbaceous layer. Several fern species populate this herb layer including netted chain fern (Woodwardia
areolata), royal fern (Osmunda regalis), cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamomea), sensitive fern (Onoclea
sensibilis) and bracken fern. The size and species composition of these areas is an estimate based upon a
review of aerial photography and field observations (Figure 5). They include:
• Palustrine forested broad-leaved deciduous (PF01)
• Palustrine forested needle-leaved evergreen (PF04)
• Palustrine forested needle-leaved evergreen / scrub-shrub broad-leaved evergreen (PF04/SS3)
• Palustrine forested needle-leaved evergreen / scrub-shrub broad-leaved evergreen saturated
(PF04/SS3B)
• Palustrine forested broad-leaved deciduous & needle-leaved evergreen / scrub-shrub broad-leaved
evergreen (PFO1/4/SS3)
• Palustrine forested broad-leaved deciduous / scrub-shrub broad-leaved evergreen (PFO1/SS3)
• Palustrine scrub-shrub (PSS)
• Palustrine scrub-shrub needle leaved evergreen (PSS4)
COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT
A federal Consistency Determination and this application will be forwarded to the North Carolina
Dept of Coastal Management requesting its concurrence.
ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT
The proposed project will not adversely impact essential fish habitat (EFH) or associated fisheries
managed by the South Atlantic or Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Councils or the National Marine
Fisheries Service.
FEDERALLY-LISTED THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES
Rough-leaved loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia) is the only known Federally threatened or
endangered species identified at the GSRA High probability habitat was surveyed for Rough-leaved
loosestrife (RLL) and no occurrences were found within the within the project limits. MCB Camp
3
Lejeune natural resources staff would continue to implement the measures described in the INRMP (MCB
Camp Lejeune 2001) to manage and preserve known populations of RLL. There would be no adverse
effects to the federally endangered RLL as a result of constructing and operating the MPMG Range at
SR-8.
Federally endangered red-cockaded woodpeckers (Picoides borealis) inhabit parts of MCB Camp
Lejeune, but no birds have been observed in the GSRA. Prior to government acquisition, timber harvests
removed mature pine stands necessary to support habitat for RCW nesting and foraging. (EDAW, Inc.
1998). Therefore, the proposed action has no potential to impact the endangered RCWs within MCB
Camp Lejeune.
The Carolina goldenrod (Solidago pulchra) is considered endangered by the state of NC, and
considered to be a species of concern at the Federal level. This plant is found within the power-line
easements around the GSRA, but there is no known occurrence within the project limits.
The American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) potentially may be found in the GSRA,
although this animal is listed as Federally threatened only because of its similarity of appearance to the
American crocodile (Crocodylus acutus), which is in fact threatened. Alligators may be encountered in or
near waterways of the GSRA but none of these areas are within the project limits. Therefore, there would
be no impacts to American alligators.
Construction, operation, and maintenance of the proposed MPMG range would have no adverse
impacts to any Federal or state listed species.
CULTURAL RESOURCES
Archeological investigations of all soils at the GSRA having a moderate or high probability of
containing archeological remains have been completed. As agreed to in a January 2000 meeting between
MCB Camp Lejeune personnel and the North Carolina SHPO, the survey of the Juniper Swamp
concludes the required archeological investigations at the GSRA. Therefore, no further cultural resource
surveys are necessary and no impacts to cultural resources are anticipated.
ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Several evaluation criteria were developed and considered when determining the placement of
this project. They are discussed in detail in the Final EA for Construction and Operation of a Multi-
purpose Machine Gun Range in the Greater Sandy Run Area at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune,
October 2005. They can be summarized as:
• Satisfy modern training mission requirements
• Minimize training conflicts between all GSRA ranges in order to maximize range utilization
• Avoid or minimize impacts to natural resources
• Manage noise impacts to acceptable levels by the surrounding community
The alternatives considered for this project included the no-action alternative, a location near the
Northwest boundary of GSRA, a location between the existing ranges SR-6 and SR-7, and the current
proposed location (Figure 6).
Alternatives Considered but Dismissed
Two locations, one near the Northwest boundary of GSRA, and the other the location between the
existing SR-6 and SR-7 ranges were considered, but eliminated from further study due to the perception
of potential noise affects on the adjacent community. During preparation of the Environmental
Assessment for this project, it was determined that placing SR-8 in its present, proposed location does not
4
create an off-base noise issue. Safe, simultaneous operation and maintenance of other existing ranges in
the GSRA (Figure 7) was another critical element that influenced site selection for this project (ranges
must be located to ensure bullet trajectories do not effect the operation of other ranges).
No-Action Alternative
The no-action alternative would limit Camp Lejeune's ability to train machine gunners on
modern weapons to current individual training standards resulting in marginal weapons proficiency, with
the unintended consequences of jeopardizing combat readiness.
Preferred Action
The GSRA Acquisition FEIS (LANTDIV 1991) and subsequent documents such as the GSRA
Master Development Plan Update (EDAW, Inc. 1998) examined wetlands in the GSRA and tried to
identify range placements that minimized impacts to wetlands during the acquisition of the GSRA. The
proposed action and preferred location for SR-8 MPMG Range, was selected after a review of the
evaluation criteria, as well as reviewing recommendations for range locations described in the GSRA
Master Development Plan Update and the Final Range Compatible Use Zone (RCUZ) Study for Marine
Corps Base, 2002.
During the preliminary investigations for this project, several sites were investigated for the
placement of the SR-8 MPMG Range to minimize impacts to wetlands. However, large live-fire ranges
inherently require large areas of cleared land. They also require large surface danger zones (those areas
that are impacted or have the potential to receive or lie in the path of fired projectiles) that mandate range
placement, including the utilities and other infrastructure needed to support the range. This ensures the
safety of not only military personnel training on the range, but all personnel training on adjacent ranges,
as well as those transiting through or near the base.
During the early planning and design stages of the range complex, the target locations, buildings,
facilities, and gravel roads within the 121 ha (300 ac) SR-8 site were placed to avoid and minimize
impacts to wetlands in a location south-southeast of the current location. However, the large surface
danger zone, prevented interoperability with other ranges and required designers to move the range to the
northwest.
Training and Range Requirements of SR-8
The SR-8 range must provide the safest environment possible to ensure all support and training
personnel on the range, (inexperienced as well as seasoned Marines) are not put at risk during prolonged
training exercises. The surface of the range must provide conditions for safe movement down-range by
personnel during live fire exercises both during night and day-time training, in variable weather
conditions, and when fatigued. The conditions of the range must also allow Range Safety Officers and
support staff responsible for safe operation of the range, clear, unobstructed views of the range and
targetry at all times, as well as access for emergency response personnel. The range must be maintained
according to prescribed maintenance schedules, to the same or nearly the same conditions throughout the
year to ensure all personnel train to the same standards.
The range must be designed so that the maximum effective range of modern weapon systems may
be realized. Many ranges on the installation simply can no longer support today's advanced weapon
systems. There is no, one single range at Camp Lejeune that can support light, medium, and heavy
machine gun training. Additionally, heavy machine gun training currently competes for training time on
other ranges such as the SR-7 Range, a Light Armor Vehicle (LAV) and Main Battle Tank (MIAl tank)
range. Therefore, training is segmented to single weapons on individual ranges instead of using the whole
weapon system on one range. This is an inefficient way to conduct entry level and sustainment training
and it does not support dismounted, fire and maneuver from heavy machine guns. The surface of this
5
range must allow machine-gunners a clear, unobstructed view of targets at long distances during day and
night-time live-fire training. Targets must be visible with and without the aid of telescopic sights. Range
access roads must be trafficable by gun crews and tactical vehicles during day and night movements.
These access roads must be wide enough to permit inexperienced personnel some latitude to make
mistakes that will not result in catastrophic vehicle accidents.
Range Maintenance Requirements of SR-8
Maintenance problems experienced with existing ranges in the GSRA are directly related to
inundation of low and poorly drained areas within the range footprint. Vegetation management in periods
of extreme wetness is costly, creates additional wear and tear on maintenance equipment, and creates
delays in scheduled maintenance cycles which can then affect training quality due to time constraints and
unit long-range training schedules. Problems with severe inundation have also effected electronic
components of expensive automated target systems and forced the base to abandon portions of some
ranges. The design of the SR-8 range must promote reasonable and regularly scheduled maintenance that
includes, mowing, road repair, target repair and replacement, utility and target component upgrades, and
cleanup of spent ammunition components for recycling.
The SR-8 MPMG Range would consist of 10 firing lanes with a raised earth-berm firing position,
4 fighting holes, 2 vehicle-firing lanes, 2 defilade-firing positions, several vehicle pads for firing vehicle-
mounted guns, and a 10-meter Battle Sight Zero (BZO) range (see attached design plans). Vehicle firing
would occur from vehicles with mounted machine guns, moving down range 400 meters. Surface Danger
Zones (SDZ) would extend out in a fan-shape to a distance of 6,900 in (22,638 ft). The range would have
32 targets in each lane, out to a distance of 1,200 in (3,937 ft). The range would accommodate
marksmanship training with medium machine guns (M249 5.56 mm, M240G 7.62mm), heavy machine
guns (M2.50 caliber and MK19 40 mm grenade) and sniper rifles (M40A3 and M82A3) during day and
night time training exercises. The range would be operational an average of 244 days per year and
roughly one-third of the operations would take place at night. Night operations would involve the use of
pyrotechnics. Helicopters would be authorized to conduct door gunnery exercises from altitudes below
152 m (500 ft) above ground level with training-practice ammunition and other inert (non-dud producing)
ammunition.
6
Wetland Impacts
Building and operating the SR-8 Range will cause unavoidable impacts to wetlands due to
mechanized land clearing, cutting, and filling required for the construction of roads, facilities, target
emplacements, buildings, and other infrastructure (Figure 6).
x

k2Ks
vti'
Construction of the MPMG Range would require impacting (clearing, cutting, and filling) 86.03
acres of non-riparian wetlands (Table 1). Previous impact estimates of 73.28 acres noted in the Final EA
for this project were recalculated. The current proposed area of impact totaling 86.03 acres includes
wetland areas located inside the project limits that were just outside of the jurisdictional delineation
boundary. The areas of compacted fill serving as the foundations for targets, roads, buildings and firing
positions totals 9.64 acres (Table 2). 76.39 acres will remain as vegetated areas to be mowed and
maintained within the range footprint. See designs attached.

' ?• 127400 61293 4649 1371334 2164542 164178 31.48
' 100101 46320 1830 1077487 1635775 64626 24.74
' 580 92 0 6243 3249 0 0.14
' ?• 54121 18995 988 582558 670802 34891 13.37
' 65930 20239 322 709671 714734 .11371 16.29
• 86.03
Table 1. Summarv of nronosed wetland impacts/eeneral fill at SR-8. Information provided by U.S. Armv
Engineering and Support Center, Huntsville, Alabama.
' ?• 20305 12086 218566 426813 15808 5.02
" 1 8703 1715 93681 60565 2243 2.15
' 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
' ?• 3178 990 34206 34962 1295 0.79
' 6831 1189 73531 41989 1555 1.69
• 9.64
Table 2. Summarv of nronosed comnacted fill areas at SR-8. Information provid ed by U.S. Armv Enaineerine and
Support Center, Huntsville, Alabama.
7
Mitigation
The Greater Sandy Run Wetland Mitigation Bank in the GSRA on Camp Lejeune was developed
specifically for range development and infrastructure projects in the GSRA (Figure 8). Compensatory
mitigation for this proposed project will be provided with credits from the GSRA Wetland Mitigation
Bank. A summary of the credits available in the GSRA Wetland Mitigation Bank is provided in Table 3.
Credit Type Total Mitigation Approved Approved Approved Mitigation Unused
Credits Mitigation Mitigation Mitigation Credits Mitigation
Established In Credits • Credits Pending
Bank • O6 Used Available Success
Criteria Total In
Bank*
Pocosin Area, 886.8 490.5 355.93 134.57 396.3 530.87*
Pocosin/Pine
Flatwoods
Big Shakey, 143.4 143.4 127.56 15.84 0 15.84*
Bottomland
Hardwoods
Burned Pine 135.5 0 0 0 135.5 135.5*
Plantation,
Pocosin/Pine
Flatwoods
Burned Pine 84.8 51.5 0 51.5 33.3 84.8*
Plantation,
Bottomland
Hardwoods
Total 1250.5 685.4 483.49 201.91 565.1 767.01
Table 3. Summary of Greater Sandy Run Mitigation Bank *These totals pending approval of performance criteria in
all portions of the bank.
The GSRA Wetland Mitigation Bank provides 1250.5 acres of restored and enhanced pocosin,
pine flatwoods, and bottomland hardwoods in the form of mitigation credits for Camp Lejeune.
Pocosin/pine flatwoods credits are debited at a ratio of 1.5:1 acres mitigated to acres lost.
Bottomland hardwoods are debited at a ratio of 3:1 acres mitigated to acres lost. A summary of
previously permitted projects in the. GSRA and impacts is provided in Table 4.

Number ACTION ID Pine Flat Hardwood Credits Pine Flat Hardwood Project
Credits Impacts Impacts
Used
P-949 199400693 25.88 0.00 25.88 17.25 0.00 17.25
P-933 199505124 100.47 22.47 122.94 66.98 7.49 74.47
P-028 199701178 14.27 0.00 14.27 9.51 0.00 9.51
P-934 199707554 18.62 14.69 33.31 12.41 4.90 17.31
P-062 199901380 18.45 11.49 29.94 12.30 3.83 16.13
P-935 200001559 37.24 20.91 58.15 24.83 6.97 31.80
HWY 17 NCDOT 141.00 58.00 199 94.00 19.30 113.3
SR-7 200400940 0.627 0.0 0.627 0.418 0.0 0.418
Targets
(Proposed)
Totals 356.56 127.56 484.12 237.72 42.6 280.19
Table 4. List of previously permitted GSRA range projects
Camp Lejeune proposes to provide compensatory mitigation for this project by debiting 129.05
pocosin/pine flat (non-riparian) credits from the bank for 86.03 acres of impacts to non-riparian wetlands
at a ratio of 1.5 credits for every acre impacted.
References/Enclosures
Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Atlantic Division (LANTDIV). 2006. Final Environmental
Assessment, P-034, Construction and Operation of a Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range, U.S. Marine
Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina.
Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Atlantic Division (LANTDIV). 2002. Draft Range Com ap tible
Use Zone (RCUZ) Study for Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina.
._A6.-K-?i` `---,"?` G
,_ ^L +? ,,. eta ,A. w CA
$
_VZ
-4pk _ _..".. .- •? :.,yam .i.. _ ,?+.? _ • ?....
"&. .w
MAI
?? ? ,u.-. _ -?. - „?. ,tai-. ? .... - •.uk. 1
`•..? -F --acs-,;? -ak_•. ? -tee .? _ .f
ti I ?. 1 ,`I
-,2d
`t 1 lag- ---- -

:t
"\ pit it , - 1? SI •.j
' J* - '111 Vy + l1 `? ,,l $ •- tit'
. ? -- ? ? I JIB' Sti 4 ^
%
?e
- - ? - =" -" ?'' _... -' • - .rum -?• -
i -V.. - _:.. .yam.. 7^? ? • 7Yi'•• '? .df.- J1.. -^ ?•. - 1 ? fi,:::c
U ,? ?..yy.T. ',i!„ f J?-• - ? ••.W - y1F,. -'i1F" ?!! ? ., ? J r y
.a.
aw
~?sII`?",?r r.S "may _StW .?F. ? -.:.•;w -?- J -- ? •5.•• .. fl
.. !h - ?.,•''8''? sr- ?• _% •'?„ 1. - din - ..,ear -.'..• -W, '?" et••
_.,..u?'• rS.. yi. -h -M. ^ ` ?y rala- _ s4••. • •+4` +•
U_ zi,
( .i
Site Boundary
Map Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle, Folkstone
SR-8 MPMG
GSRA
MCB Camp Lejeune
Onslow County, NC
Individual Permit Application
0
Prepared: March 2, 2006
Author. Land and Wildlife Resources Section
Organization: Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune
Environmental Conservation Branch
N
A
1,500 3,000
Feet
1 inch equals 1,500 feet
Figure 2. Topographic Map
•?o ?? ? ? +? ?? ? ' M t ?aF? ,??''I^* ? s--N' ? i ,p? ?,rYik x ?. s ? i. ? ?'?!'" 4
k+'
.? c sue, ?i X71 t"' ?? 'i"t"i Sf•r1 ;??`j?' ,n??' ?=s ? j -?
k +?-A^11, t ?{cY'T Mt y??h't 'y,,4'?"v ?' y J^? q r "?.
.?.. c 'x try s ;?" w r. y 2 h` A
?T% 3 4 ??a? ? ? +?+?`ti 7 `^" ?: J'?c S # .r : y h 5 ? sus t ? '{? s p 1
9
:= ??} , ? ? ?; ? 111(
1 ' t v 5 'N rU krrK
hrtL.
(,r x t 1 ?;?, r/i•
,
r
a .
y' ? '?.' St-t F t ? ?`•. 9 SY ?J r4 [ ?. 1 ` 1 ,y ? 4t Y'f
1
Ln
r.. a
FO
,: . ?.,}t• to ? t -,. _. ?t ?
r j To
N
A
M Site Boundary 0 800 1,600
TTTT Feet
Map Source: Soil Survey of Onslow County, North Carolina 1992 1 Inch equals 800 feet
SR-8 MPMG
GSRA Prepared: March 2, 2006
MCB Camp Lejeune Author: Land and Wildlife Resources Section
Onslow County, NC Organization: Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune Figure 3. Soils Map
Individual Permit Application Environmental Conservation Branch
r
pM
_ t
`d„) � � '�-li � '
.'r 5 -
`"r 1 4 4 Y .
� S
_ ?� _
'� _s':
�,
f '� .r+
w„y ':
r +- ;;
J :: !i
.� j'.:-.
�o�i,
�; �:..
_._ . .... .. _ _. 1 _.

.f
mp
.t4 �' i ♦ n <i�
J 111111
w i•d ;. , yy,,
WAT
f W
V.j lid' a ' ��'n�j..� iloan Q
�'� 8„ ti.� Y� p y � +:• s� r
x -
Ij.
. •oil '.
t fi r
11
t

Ar V,
Fk 'gl°^ y r ??}d•# L +r R t ? ?`' ? A, 3 r.? < _? .i.?, s ? '_ ?.-4 k?Q ?°
i T I ?. ? 9? Y i Y.!
? ?` ? ? ? -r `t "g 'e'y ? y.+T :• ? e ? ? t? Sr .i
t .e'er x zYrrip a:'° - t ?' '# a 3? ? ?r J 4 [ r?. i _
'? m l??ijt '? ?;???N • ???. ??' ?A1 fah ? '"??', ?, ?? s?Fr'"S + -. x '?Y i, ?. ??) ,? ? _
, 6e
•
r
L..," f ? "A 2,
i rr
4
10
j.. • V `! .' ' • v Y
?`, ?r ? .d ? -e? l J r
aw j F•Tf# ? r ?c ? t ?'
SR-8 MPMG LAYOUT
L -r Judstictional Wetlands
SR-8 MPMG
GSRA
MCB Camp Lejeune
Onslow County, NC
Individual Permit Application
Prepared: March 2, 2006
Author: Land and Wildlife Resources Section
Organization: Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune
Environmental Conservation Branch
N
A
0 800 1,600
!TTTn Feet
1 inch equals 800 feet
Figure 6. Project Layout.

t?- ? 7a
i
¢t_ -e-Y C

?

5
5_
K'
3
f
<

t
?
R
\\Z t

4

S+
= GSRA Wetland Mitigation Bank
SR-8 MPMG
GSRA
MCB Camp Lejeune
Onslow County, NC
Individual Permit Application
Prepared: March 2, 2006
Author: Land and Wildlife Resources Section
Organization: Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune
Environmental Conservation Branch
N
A
0 4,200 8,400
Feet
1 inch equals 4,200 feet
Figure 8. GSRA Wetland Mitigation Bank
D DD C7 ?

x",
4
1
1
T
L?
/7 \? \\7 /i 3
__

x •~a--x
N
• e - •: a \?gl I i99
d
?
I
?
•
•
, j
, i .r 3
3 -. 1
- 3 3 9 3 (
I
x
o x ?? j i III 6i I\ o e ?
? o h e
t? a e o h Ll?E \? • i I Pj I ?e x x x' 7 ?.
o 0 0• 0 0 o x \ !3„ •1\? ,
P.I 4\

`4 W

Nr?
>. ,??y ,a x o eA

\ o ? Q3 \I a e V n h \'? \ ? ?. ?1. _I
- ?? 7
41
v ?

cn LTI

\\\
? 8 ? i ? [I 9 pFSM1Exi 6 M xrrt .a iKLLlil[t [w1.EFtl.6 [Pwr<
?r g ? p 4_ ? 9 11
; ?C

X
A
[+
e

f
f.
f ATLANTIC
DIVISION
c
p
?

? ? T'

?

?

r

? -
1
V
'
"
Q
e ? F 8 xuvr truia .orca4. vtwixu . ? ? ? 8 ;
g
?
}•
? S ¢ P MULTIPURPOSE MACHINE GUN RANGE ; I ?
1
i
0 ?# f
$
MARINE CORPS BASE
CAMP LEJEUNE
NC
°
•$
i
.
.
p
GENER
FI
DEPTHS
C
T
I II
I
T
AL
U
/
LL j

() O
D co
t
a
VAR FIG 4 7 610 VAR
IF S
GENERAL NOTES:

_ PROPOSED
PROFILE i...F 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

-
GR00E25x
0.125% < i
2. FILTER FABRIC AND GEOGRID SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF COMPACTED FILL.
6

D D

? ?
EXISTING
GROUND FILTER FABRIC COVERED WITH GEOGRID (SEE GENERAL NOTE EXISTINC
2)
GROUND
NOTE: 305 COMPACTED FILL (MIN)
1. FOR LIMITS OF CLEARING SEET SHEET C-148. 305 AGGREGATE SURFACE COURSE
CLEARING LIMITS.
8

ACCESS ROAD VARIES VARIES
E
T
S <zE Y3
w 44?
.
. I
N.
I R?q I
^
o ;8$
FINISHED
°w 0.250x 0.250% GRADE
VARIES VARIES

7
3.' c
FINISHED FILTER FABRIC COVERED WITH GEOGRID ISEE GENERAL NOTE 21

o GRADE
FILL (MIN)
305 COMPACTED

.+
U o
2507.
0 ?
0
250% O 152 AGGREGATE SURFACE COURSE
FINISHED wermv[u
. .
GRADE v o-

TARGET SERVICE ROAD AND MANEUVER TRAIL .eo I
FILTER FABRIC COVERED WITH GEOGRID (SEE GENERAL NOTE 2)

N.T.S.
FINISHED
GRADE 305 COMPACTED FILL (MIN) m
305 AGGREGATE SURFACE COURSE

NOTES: _
VARIES VARIES
(MIN. 33531 G
- 4S72
1
VARIES
VARIES
1. LANE WIDTHS ARE 3353- FOR SERVICE ROAD 1.
w PROPOSED
PROFILE
i a -
2. WHERE SERVICE ROAD 1 WIDENS AT PARKING AREA. a s i
CROSS-SLOPE OF 0.250% SHALL EXTEND ACROSS

o GRADE

A

a "-?
as i

nv .e.ano-

??w
PARKING AREA FROM ROAD CENTERLINE. PARKING AREA SEE NOTE
l 0. 125 Y.
PAVEMENT STRUCTURE IS SAME AS SERVICE ROAD
vaw aa.v
PAVEMENT STRUCTURE. _
_

B Ex ISTING ----- ------
SERVICE ROAD SURFACETE '` g
g
z B
COURSE EXISTING
GROUND 4 cWi
N.T.S.
\ Q Z N
NOTES: FILTER FABRIC COVERED WITH GEOGRID (SEE GENERAL NOTE 2) 4 0: w o
I. BLADE EXISTING AGGREGATE SURFACE
TO ATTAIN REOUIRED CROSS-SLOPE OF 0.125X. 305 COMPACTED FILL (MIN) Z
C Q Z
W -"
305 AGGREGATE SURFACE COURSE J W
2. FOR LIMITS OF CLEARING SEE SHEET C-148.
Y > W 0. N
4 CLEARNG LIMITS.
CC ROAD UPGRADE
N.T.S.
i? 2 f
u
¢ -
f W S!

W

w 0.250% 0.250% FINISHED
¢ N
N m
to
GRADE J d CD

T
3;'
77
FIN ISHE

¢

N
Ir ¢

¢
GRADE 1219 £ 0. o
FILTER FABRIC COVERED WITH GEOGRIO (SEE GENERAL NOTE 2)
W
It
K
FINI
GRADEHED 305 COMPACTED FILL (MIN)
h b
J ti
f

305 AGGREGATE SURFACE COURSE 102 AGGREGATE
IF N K
¢
152 COMPACTED SURFACE COU0.5E
\? € 1 F A
A FILL (MIN.)
F LT ER FABRIC
D WITH
R
VE
E
(SEE GENERAL NOTE NOTE 2)
21
BUILDING ACCESS ROAD
S I DEWALK
N.T.S.
N.T.S.

v2e0
C-5D1

C

) I

GENERAL NOTES:
DIRECTION OF A
FIRE 1. CONCRETE SHALL DEVELOP A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE '
SEE SHEET C-801 AND C-802 STRENGTH OF 28 MPO IN 28 DAYS. 5
W
FOR TOP OF BERM WIDTHS 2. EMPLACEMENTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF REINFORCED
CONCRETE: CONCRETE STRUCTURES SHALL BE PRECAST
RAILROAD
SLOPE 2% TIE CONTROL POINT OR CAST-IN-PLACE.
{.152 25 (TYP1 3. AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE
L'O' z 102
z 12.7 z 100 I L
1( 457 REVEGETATED OR RESURFACED CONSISTENT WITH THE NATURAL
SURROUNDINGS. GROUND COVER SHALL NOT REDUCE TARGET
STEEL ANGLE
(SEE NOTE 5
FILL SLOPE 3:1 VISIBILITY.
152
COMPACTED
' FINISHED 4. PLACE TREATED RAILROAD TIES AGAINST CONCRETE WALL ON
SLOPE 2
:
F
GRADE Lt 02 X 102 X 12.7 X 100 STEEL ANGLES SPACED A MAXIMUM
ILL 152 OF 900 ON CENTER. ATTACH ANGLE TO CONCRETE WALL WITH C
' 152 IMINI a
° ee CONCRETE ANCHORS. 3R
SLOPE 2X 5. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
1FILTER FABRIC
(MIN.)
ISEE GENERAL NOTE 6) CAPILLARY WATER BARRIER
6. FILTER FABRIC AND GEOGRIO SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF F
y?
S
S
013 REBAR O 300 O.C.E.W.
(CENTERED IN WALL AND SLAB) FILTER FABRIC COVERED WITH GEOGRID (SEE GENERAL NOTE 6) CAPILLARY WATER BARRIER AND COMPACTED FILL. S
Yt
sil

SECTION A
C
N.T.S. C-502 C-502

A
C-502 C-502 reo
21
U .
VE

o-as
1
CONTROL POINT A
1 1372 1
r
SEE SHEETS C-801 AND C-802
1
FOR COORDINATES AND ELEVATION RAIL CAD TIE
CONTROL POINT B v p e ?
°P
SEE SHEETS C-801 AND C-802
15 5 YP. 50 FOR COORDINATES AND ELEVATION
•
g
z
127
' Z f E
W
1 SEE SHEETS C-801 AND C-802
\ y C z Q
ELECTRICAL FOR TOP OF BERM WIDTHS
K
T
\ u
G D: W
.LOC
OU
o \ 381 X 76 TYP. z
= z
0 W
W
\ / XN D J r
Y? z f
e?
, ? Q U Q
? U
N

Q O
a N LL
/ cr 'L z
L >

b 3 W
? z z
o
- f K

g ? N f
? i
SINGLE STATIONARY INFANTRY TARGET (SIT) EMPLACEMENT
N.T.S.

v 2B0
?C-502

C
C
DIRECTION OF GENERAL NOTES: 5
FIRE
SEE SHEET C-801 AND 0-802 1. CONCRETE SHALL DEVELOP A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE n
&RALROAD OP OF BERM WIDTHS STRENGTH OF 28 MPO IN 28 DAYS.
2. EMPLACEMENTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF REINFORCED
CONCRET E: CONCETE STRUCTURES SHALL BE PRECAST
SLOPE 2% CONTROL POINT OR CAST-IN-PLACE.
1.152 25 ITYPI 957 3, AREA "
L102 DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE
%02 I
12,7 100 1 REVEGETATED OR RESURFACED CONSISTENT WITH THE NATURAL
STEEL ANGLE SURROUNDINGS. GROUND COVER SHALL BE REDUCE TARGET
(SEE NOTE 5 152 FILL SLOPE 3:1 VISI BILITY•
COMPACTED SLOPE 2X FINISHED 9. PLACE TREATED RAILROAD TIES AGAINST CONCRETE WALL ON
FILL 52t
GRADE
L 102 X 102 X 12.7 X 100 STEEL ANGLES SPACED A MAXIMUM OF
ATTACH ANGLE TO CONCRETE WALL WITH
B00 ON CENTER
152 (MINI
°
qp
.
CONCRETE ANCHORS. 3 9
j
F
152
FILTER FABRIC SLOPE 2X
5. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. f

(SEE GENERAL NOTE 61
(MI N.1 CAPILLARY WATER BARRIER ?
q?
t3 REBAR a 300 O.C.E.w. FILTER FABRIC COVERED WITH GEOGRID (SEE GENERAL NOTE 6). 6. FILTER FABRIC AND GEOGR ID SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF
CAPILLARY WATER BARRIER AND COMPACTED FILL. w
u Iq:
?q
(CENTERED IN WALL AND SLAB)
SECTION A
N.T.S. C-5 'g-c-503
r

_ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
r _ _ ------------------ --
_ A

C-503 C-503 C-503 C-503 .w
/ \ 00
TOE OF BERM
/ \ °...
, _

> 1676 1676
1
_m_ o-io
/ CONTROL POINT A 15 1372 1 1
CONTROL POINT A
SEE SHEETS C-801 AN
C-i802 1 1372 t SEE SHEETS C-801 AND C-802
FOR COORDINATES AND ELEVATION
RAILROAD TIE I
r 1
RAIL OAD TIE
CONTROL POINT 8
0 o r.
ro-
FOR COORDINATES AND I SEE SHEETS C-801 AND C-802
1 0 TYP. 5p 15 5 0 TY
50 FOR COORDINATES AND ELEVATION a Z

t 127
CONTROL POINT B
AND C-
A
I 127
(
/ 8
4 U
w Z W
Y
t ANO ELEVATION
FOR COORDIN
TES
SEE SHEETS C-801 AND C-802 d
k Z w U
¢
\ FOR TOP OF BERM WIDTHS YY a z
? m a
\ ELECTRICAL
BLOCKOUT f
\ ELECTRICAL 381 X 76 TYP. C ? Z
w w
\
o BLOCK OUT
381 X 76 TYP.
w // _
N J

__ ° ¢
___ ____ g u u
U S w

°
0 N m
a
6 d / g ????ppp d (L

O_
LL
z

z
8000 AT 50M TARGETS b b j O
10000 AT 100M TARGETS
Y m
?
¢
$ d N I
II
DOUBLE STATIONARY INFANTRY TARGET (SIT) EMPLACEMENT 1--
N. 7 • d 20W
C-5f?3
4 5
I I c I I I I

-5 4 C 504
?OFEBERM C-5 C-504 PEEE
8POINT B
CO
NTROL02
FOR
SEE C
COORDINATES AND ELEV.
AL El OCKOUT RAILROAD
12 AIL 11 TIE (TYP) 2m
POINT A
FOR ES AND ELEV. 45• 152 (MIN)(TYP)
4?
O H$ _30.OOOm > Y l
PLAN
N.T.S.
CMOVING INFANTRY TARGET EMPLACEMENT c
N.T.S.
NOTE: SEE SHEET C-802 FOR GENERAL NOTES.
RAILROAD TIE TOP OF BERM WIDTH. 1. ?•
CONCRETE SHALL DEVELOP A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF
CONTROL POINT 28 MPO IN 28 DAYS. ..n.. w.iw.c.w..o
152 DIRECTION
25 (TYP) ?- SLOPE 21 3 OF FIRE 2' EMPLACEMENTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF REINFORCED CONCRETE: ?n
wa. 11 CONCRETE STRUCTURES SHALL BE PRECAST OR CAST-IN-PLACE.
-COMPACTED L12.7 10 .102 0 k 3. AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE `"'"w "'""•"w"
FILL SLOPE 660 FILL STEEL ANGLE REVECETATED OR RESURFACED CONSISTENT WITH THE NATURAL mx
31 152 152 SURROUNDINGS. GROUND COVER SHALL NOT REDUCE TARGET '+ ?•
(MIN) (SEE NOTE 5) VISIBILITY.-0f10x-
GRADE SLOPE 2% t
152 FINISHED
GRADE 4. PLACE TREATED RAILROAD TIES AGAINST CONCRETE WALL ON _
DRaN 152 <MIN)
TO L102 X 102 X 12.7MM X IOOMM STEEL ANGLES SPACED A
SLOPE 2% (MIN) FILTER FABRIC MAXIMUM OF 900MM ON CENTER. ATTACH ANGLE TO
CAPILLARY WATER BARRIER (SEE GENERAL NOTE 7) CONCRETE WALL WITH CONCRETE ANCHORS.
FILTER FABRIC COVERED WITH GEOGRIO 5. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE gw
(SEE GENERAL NOTE 7) •13 REBAR O 300 O.C. E.W. INDICATED. $ o-=
(CENTERED IN WALL AND SLAID b U C
6. THE EMPLACEMENT MAY BE REVERSED OR MIRRORED FROM WHAT W Z Z L
SECTION /{ S SHOWN MERE. IN ANY CASE. THE PROTECTED END OF THE 4 d Z W
N.T.S. C- O4 C-SOI EMPLACEMENT IS ALWAYS NEARER TO THE FIRING POINT AND THE Y k ¢ Z U
ELECTRICAL BLOCKOUT IS ON THE PROTECTED END. W Y 0= ¢
7 FILTER FABRIC AND GEOGRID SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF j N . J LL, w
457 CAPILLARY WATER BARRIER AND COMPACTED FILL.
0 75 Y>_ z F r
w
U U ¢
YE CY YEYE I I\ T _ a W 1-
3 381 510 381
FINISHED COMPACTED \ Z N
\?// w ¢
GRADE '7 - - FILL ELECTRICAL } I a. m
FILTER FABRIC BLOCKOVT ¢ a LL
Glt f.-CONCRETE W.I. U a O Z
c ? U
(7
SECTION DETAIL 1 y z
N.T.S. C- o4C-504 ELECTRICAL BLOCKOUT DETAIL s f >
N.T.S. a Y
al
,:> 4 5
E
C
i
a

t
s
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. FILTER FABRIC AND GEOGRID SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF COMPACTED FILL. 6
DIRECTION _ 2000 3. FILTER FABRIC SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF CAPILLARY WATER BARRIER. y 1-
1
OF FIRE CONTROL POINT
TOP OF TIMBER WALL .
X
?-
1676
152A END WALL TO A POINT
A
E FIN
SHED GRADE
? SLOP E 2% 305
BOV
I

"
/.?/.?.` O LTER n
FABRI(SNERAL NOTE
T.WALL
52 CAPLLARY WATER BARRIER FINISHED GRADE
S-SOA
G OVERED WITH GEOGRID ISEE GENERAL NOTE 21
S' CONCRETE PAD (SEE NOTE 3' 9
COMPACTED FILL
SUPPORT

SECT IO A
N.T.S.C-505 C-505
C
NOTES:
1. CONCRETE SHALL DEVELOP A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE
STRENGTH OF 28 MPA IN 28 DAYS.
2. SEE SHEET E-508 FOR CONCRETE PAD LOCATIONS.
3. DESIGN OF CONCRETE PAD IS THE RESPONSIBILITY
OF THE CONTRACTOR.
POWERCENTER
EMPLACEMENT
N.T.S.
4
5
u F
- Z I
a z
z w Z
5 w w
N O J w
2 f J
? 2 U E
u w
2Q w a w
J N O CO Z
w
a CC OL CC
:3 CC w
3
u o
I w
-1 Z.
r 69 „ W 200
C-505
I
C
EL 20.40
0
Fa oa o0
?- ?? zo 000 -
?a ?LL ?a w LL
TYPICAL FIRING LANE POSITION LAYOUT
N. T.S
C
SERVICE ROAD 4
TOP OF DITCH 3
r-
2%
SERVICE ROAD 4
TOP OF DITCH \
2j
B N 3832177.20
E 269907.07
EL 20.40
3 4 I tD
GENERAL NOTES:
I. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.'
2. FILTER FABRIC AND GEOGRID SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF COMPACTED FILL.
3. SEE SHEETS C-507 AND C-508 FOR FIRING POSITIONS DETAILS.
5000 4. SEE SHEET C-514 FOR RAILROAD TIE STEP DETAILS.
3 0? 3
11- 11
FABRIC FILTER COVERED?F I NSHED
WITH GEOGRID (SEE GENERAL NOTE 21 GRADE
NORTH/SOUTH CENTERLINE FIRING BERM SECTION
N.T.S
SERVICE ROAD 4
TOP OF DITCH
7
' -FINISHED
FABRIC FILTER COVERED GRADE
WITH GEOGRID (SEE GENE RAL NOTE 2) EAST/WEST CENTERLINE FIRING BERM SECTION COMPACTED FILL
N.T.S
N 3832120.26 N 3832176.68 SERVICE ROAD 4
E 269910.16 E 269966.87
EL 20.40 TOP OF DITCH
EL 20.40
A
NCRTH/SOUTH
DIRECTION ' -
1
I 3'
_
OF FIRE ` CENTERLINE OF '
N 3832127.37 (DOWNRANGE) FIRING BERM N 3832162.57 1 Ye
T, I E 269917.25
E 269952.69
I
rvl EL 20.40 EL 20.40
n
Q! 1 M

3:1 ¢1
l
3:7
N 3832169.63

38321
N 5.52
5

3:7
?I

3:1
383211
N
E 26997:
w N 3832139.36 N 3832141.41 5.60 - E 269959.78
E 2699
4 _I
EL 20. a1
?I E 26992x.34 1 E 2699142 n N 3832748.47 EL 20.40 .%i EL 20.40 rcl
„I EL 20.40 1 EL 20.40 E 269938.51 -Wi
J o n LANE I
3:1
LEAST/WEST
CENTERLINE OF
FIRING BERM
aI
A (TYP.)-
B (TYP.)C ITYP.)
D (TYP.)
I LANE
LANE 10
.
2A
A
2
i
_
M
7
m m 3
1

3:1
TER OF 3:1 3:1
LROAD TIE 19
l T

I i 3:1 TYPICAL FIRING LANE RAILROAD TIE 3:1
CENTER OF STEPS 3:1
D TIE RAILROAD TIE (SEE NOTE 4)
TE
.PLAN A - ROOF TOP FIRING POSITION
8 - STANDING FIRING POSTION
N.T.S C - WALK-IN FIGHTING TIRING POSITION
E (TYP.I D - PRONE FIRING POSITION
IRING POSITION
R
P
U
FIRING BERM POSITION
FIR
ING
F - KNEELING
N.T.S
z 4 5
a
e
oL

_? vNa_
?ac_ •nn
Z E
a 0
d
Y ¢ Z
4 ¢
W0 Z
w
N V J
Y> Z s x
U DO
Yu i w z
z w ¢ ¢
J
:D cr
£ d U
6 5 ^
j
E ? Q
Y u ?
f t I
2
1700 7600 2550 2500 7650
DIRECTION
OF FIRE
IDOWNRANGEI
LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 LANE T LANE 8

1 ? G I J I I
C
RAILROA
TYP.
6
200 GENERAL NOTES: e r
I
h`-^1 1. CONCRETE SHALL DEVELOP A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH .
OF 29 MPa IN 28 DAYS.
2. ALL REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE PER ASTM A615. GRADE 60.
RAILROAD TIES
TYP. 3. AREAS DISTURBED By CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE
REVEGETATED OR RESURFACED CONSISTENT WITH THE NATURAL
SURROUNDINGS. GROUND COVER SHALL NOT REOUCE TARGET
VISIBILITY e
.
4. ALL WOOD FRAMING SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED. ALL WOOD °b
500 CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE WITH HOT-DIPPED GALVANIZED NAILS.
L
250 5. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. °g 6S

/// CL FIRING POSITION
F RE p
Y2
F ONT FIRING
zoo ° !
Sit
RAILROAD TIES
TYP.
SIDE VIEW PLAN 1011 D"` -{
o
N.T.S. N.T.S.
n
U
Z o
KNEELING FIRING POSITION (F)
N.T.S. ?' 'mmov4o
C FRONT VIEW
N.T.S.
50,100
WOOD
C BRACING
50,100
WOOD
BRACING 600
'Go
50.100
WOOD
BRACING
BRA

l
L
G 19 PLYWOOD
50,150
WOOD
L
BRACING
FINISHED GRADE
200xe00xt00
CMU BLOCK
TYP FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW PLAN
N.T.S. N.T.S. N.T.S.
WINDOW/BUNKER APERTURE FIRING POSITION (E)
N.T.S.

WOOD POLE FRONT FIRING
POSITION
?t.o .w?iw . s

- 2000 . J -?- -
CONCRETE

PLAN z

N.T.S.
5 d W
Z w
Y a z

A\v??i????il? o z
V
jN J Z
y? w a

tp z f
u r

£ = N
IRINC CONCRETE
FRONT 1000 V f d
POSITION . z

NOTES. C
J N 0]
d N .
¢
1. WOOD POLE SHALL BE TREATED WITH A m ¢ w
PRESERVATIVE TREATMENT. ! a u
150 ? r W
I I
7
1 ? B fi 7z
+ 150
150 f R
? E
SIDE VIEW
N.T.S.

STANDING FIRING POSITION (B)
?,?
N.T.S. > 200
?
C-5f?7

C

100
150
AGGREGATE-
WALK
aI

A>•?;r Ao
'

? p••A'
A'•
p•.
A'•AT?

q
150 • 150
1420

'Y
'
AGGREGATE ,
.
A
WALK ?e
o
A
'
30 D e
e
e P
2 I 3 I 4
6990
3000 2840 150 DIRECTION E_
730
SLOPE 27. (MINI
TOP
OF WALL
COARSE T w •19
AGGREGATE 00 - X 450
3 FILLER BENT DOWEL o
•19 X 450 00 (TYP)
BENT DOWEL (TYP) 0 150
SLOPE 2X DRAIN BLOCKOUT
150
?.aA.• A••?• •<O '?f,1 e?•e?8 150
SLOPE 2X •13 0 300 O.C.E.W.
fMIN.) ICENT ERED IN ALL WALLS AND SLAB)
ILTER FABRIC 600
SEE GENERAL NOTE 7) CPPILLARY WATER BARRIER
SECTION F 300
N.T.S. C-508 C-508 CL FIRING POSITION
FRONT FIRING
POSITION
C DIRECTION
OF FIRE
C-512C-512 (DOWNRANGE)
2500
2100
150 211111 20 150
-? COARSE
AGGREGATE
FILLER
DRAIN BLOCKOUT
150
(TYPI
(4) •19 X 450
BENT DOWEL
0 300 O.C. (TYP)
(3) •19 X 450
BENT DOWEL
Q 500 D.C.(TYP) PLAN
N.T.S.
1 I
PLAN
N.T.S.
WALK-IN FIGHTING FIRING POSITION (C)
N.T.S.
GENERAL NOTES:
I. CONCRETE SHALL DEVELOP A MINIMUM COMPRESIVE STRENGTH
OF 29 MPa IN 28 DAYS. 6
2. WALK-IN FIGHTING POSITIONS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF REINFORCED ¢ r
CONCRETE: CONCRETE STRUCTURES SHALL BE PRECAST OR e L
CAST-IN-PLACE.
3. ALL REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE PER ASTM A615, GRADE 60.
4. AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE
REVEGETATED OR RESURFACED CONSISTENT WITH THE NATURAL
SURROUNDINGS. GROUND COVER SHALL NOT REDUCE TARGET
VISIBILITY. d
5. ALL WOOD FRAMING SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED. ALL WOOD
CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE WITH HOT-DIPPED GALVANIZED NAILS. A
6. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. Z E
7. FILTER FABRIC SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF CAPILLARY WATER E€v Y
BARRIER.`
ex3
SAND BAGS
C
500
rorxav[o
300
NOTE:SAND BAGS SHALL BE
POLYPROPYLENE WITH A UV
INHIBITER, ne
SIDE VIEW ¢w- -
y_ Rrln
N.T.S. ?
_eA- ovv
500 9 o-T
SAND
RZING
L B "ZING
50.100
W OD
WOOD
BRACINIG
FINISHED GRADE
60
20OX40OX100 SIDE VIEW FRONT VIEW
CMU BLOCK N.T.S. N.T.S.
TYP
ROOF TOP FIRING POSITION (A),
N.T.S.
4
PLAN
N.T.S.
PRONE FIRING POSITION (D)
N.T.S.
5
U '
z
% W
E o
K 7
z
V
N O J Z
j O
Z F F
O = U N
U
U z o
U1 O-
N ,
J NO m ^
D:
0! o.
LL
a o
U
I- W
_1 z
a
` ? a

GENERAL NOTE:
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
E_
2. SEE SHEET E-509 FOR RANGE LIMIT MARKER POWER AND LIGHT
FIXTURE MOUNTING DETAIL. 6

D D
3. LOCATION OF LIMIT MARKERS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BY BASE RANGE
SAFTEY OFFICER.
l;

?
E Y
Dg Y3

51 r 1220
y 51 19MM EXTERIOR PLYWOOD

RED AND BLACK STRIPES
C STRIPES SHALL ANGLE C
DOWN TOWARDS THE
RANGE
0
152 reu

}- veo
305
no .o. ?o..a...r
RANGE
1 O2MM X 1O2MM
TREATED WOOD POSTS

0
z
B w
/ %
6 U
I
x Y ¢ z
a;
f F
:
W ¢ W
.
ifr1? Z Z ?
f (..T. j^ U J Y
.:f't' Y > w a a
Z f
Y
F_LE VATION VIEW SIDE VIEW - £ U U F-
Q F
RANGE LIMIT MARKER a w a J
J N m w
N.T.S. ¢ a N Z
2
i a o

Y w
b b j
? f ¢
Y m a
_
NOTE: A
A
1. DIAGONAL STRIPES ON LIMIT MARKER SHALL ANGLE DOWN TOWARDS THE RANGE.
2. LOCATION OF LIMIT MARKERS l41 TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BY BASE RANGE SAFT EY OFFICER.

s 200
C-509
1 2 3 4 5
i
C
C
H
1
GENERAL NOTE:
7.315M TOTAL WIDTH
-' I. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
3658
oW
152 DIA.
STEEL PIPE NI
2134
127 DIA. STEEL PIP
.n
IE= 19 x 127 PII 1 C, ,
61 1
PADLOCKS
25? 10 A 4
C ROADWAY
ROAD SURFACE 22 DIA HOLE THR 1 10 HOLE F
PIPE AND PLATE 25 7 PADLOCKS
NOTE: ALL EXPOSED STEEL TO
BE PRIMED AND PAINTED.
LOCK DETAIL
N.T.S.
SECURITY BARRIER ELEVATION
N.T.S.
STRENGTHxSOLT HIGH
NOTE: ALL EXPOSED STEEL TO
BE PRIMED AND PAINTED. 5 76 C4 STANDARD
HANNEL 7 X 9.8
25 SPACER 406 LONG
1
41 152 DIA.
152 DIA. _EL 32 STEEL PIPE 5 -25 DIA. STEEL PIPE
165 DIA. x 13 THICK PLATE 5 178
GATE POST WELD TO PIPE 25 DIA.
27 DIA. HOLE STEEL PIPE
127 DIA.
STEEL PIPE
152 DI A. 127 DIA.
STEEL PIPE STEEL PIPE
5 DIA.
STEEL PIPE
27 DIA. HOLE
THRU 80TH PLATES
165 DIA. X 13 THICK PLATE 25 DIA' 279 x 279 13
WELD TO PIPE STEEL PIPE
127 DIA. STEEL STIFFENER WELD
STEEL PIPE TO PIPE AND PLATE
25 DIA X 51 HIGH 152 WIDE X 305 LONG X 13 6 (NOTCH OUT FOR BOLT HEAD)
STRENGTH BOLT. THICK STEEL PLATE
BASE
POST FOUNDATION SECURITY BARRIER DETAILS
N.T.S. N.T.S.
-> 4 5
111,11
mailt 3! I
E ?vC
U '
Z
p u
E
¢ D
Z Z !;?
o
N U J W
Z i ¢
O = V Q
U 0
U Q ?
Z N
J NC) m 7
U
Q ? ? N
0_ U
~ w
? 7
G ?

I

J
1.83M

9-GAGE TIE WIRES
(O.6M O.C. MAX.)
FABRIC
TOP OR BRACE RAIL ATTACHMENT
N.T.S.
9 D
L
ja-
STEEI
4 ( TIE WIRE TIE WIRE
0.4M O.C. MAX. AND (0.4M O.C. MAX. AND
WITHIN 0.1.. FROM WITHIN O'ImM FROM
TOP AND BOTTOM TOP AND BOTTOM
OF FABRIC) OF FABRIC)
HH-RF ROUND POST
LINE POST ATTACHMENTS
N.T.S.
0.3M
FENCE POST
8 AWG SOLID
COPPER WIRE
0.3M
MOLDED EXOTHERMIC WELD
OR APPROVED CLAMP-TYPE
FITTING OF COPPER (TYP)
NOTES
I. THE •8 AWG CONDUCTOR HAL GLEN FE CE POS TAND T E THE
TENSION WIRE.
y FOR GATES USE A •6
BRAIDED COPPER GROUND
STRAP TO CONNECT GATE
TO GROUNDED FENCE POST
GROUNDING DETAIL
N.T.S.
N6a. O ?yQ ? 1 1
VGS (TYP.)
TENSION BANG TENSION BAND
(WITHIN 0.IM
`? OM OF F ABRIC)
C
TENSION BAR TENSED WIRE OR
TENSION WIRE
H-BE TRUSS RO CARRIAGE BOLT
(9.5 WN. DIA.) L_j
ROUND POST BM TO
ACH FABRIC LINK
BRACE RAIL CLAMP DETAILS END OR GATE POST DETAIL TENSION BAND DETAIL
N.T.S. FASTENING DETAILS
N.T.S.
GENERAL NOTES:
I. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. DETAILS SHOWN ARE TO CLARIFY REOUIREMENTS AND ARE NOT
INTENDED TO LIMIT OTHER TYPES OF FENCE SECTIONS AND METHO
OF INSTALLATION.
-A A 3. WIRE TIRES. RAILS. POSTS. AND BRACES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED
ON THE SECURE SIDE OF THE FENCE ALIGNMENT. CHAIN-LINK
0 FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE SECURE
AREA.
vfq 4. FENCE SHALL HAVE EXTENSION ARMS EXTENDED OUTWARD
FROM THE AREA BEING PROTECTED.
4 S. C-SECTION POSTS SHALL BE INSTALLED SO THAT THE VOID
INSIDE THE POST IS COMPLETELY FILLED WITH CONCRETE UP
L ATCH TO THE TOP OF THE FOUNDATION.
S T ANDARD HINGE 6. SWING GATE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH PADLOCK AND
ASSEMBLY LATCH ASSEMBLY.
N.T.S. 7. GATE FRAME SHALL BE A MINIMUM 48 MILLIMETER NOMINAL
N.T.S. (ROUND) OR 50 MILLIMETER NOMINAL (SQUARE). GATE FRAME
SHALL BE OF WELDED CONSTRUCTION OR SHALL BE ASSEMBLED
f LOCK PIN (TYP.) ff BARBED WIRE (TYP.) HEAVY FITTINGS AT CONTRACTOR'S OPTION A WELDED
W 45• TRUSS ROD
35• (9.5 MIN. DIA.)
PLAN PIN 9.5 PLAIN PIN E _
I RIVETED FLUSH (TYP) I RIVETED FLUSH fTYP.) o i
CONCRETE BASE
LINE POST CORNER POST
EXTENSION ARM DETAILS
N.T.S.
7

STEEL POST SCHEDULE
USE AND SECTION MINIMUM OUTSIDE
DIMENSIONS (NOMINAL
CORNER,END 6 PULL POSTS 73 O.D.
TUBULAR - ROUND 63 SQUARE
TUBULAR - SOUARE 89 X 89
C-SECTION (ROLL FORMED)
LINT POSTS 60 O.D.
TUBULAR - ROUND 57 X 43
H-SECTION 57 X 43
C-SECTION (ROLL FORMED)
TOP 6 BRACE RAILS 42 O.D.
TUBULAR - ROUND 3g O
D.
TUBULAR - SOUARE
H-SECTION .
41X 38

C-SECTION (ROLL FORMED) 41 % 32
4
USING
HORIZONTAL BRACE MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF TRUSS RODS TO
BRACE WELDED GATE FRAME. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROPER RIGID CONSTRUCTION OF GATE
SUPPLIED.
GATE POST SCHEDULE
GATE LEAF WIDTH OUTSIDE DIMENSION
(NOMINAL) (NOMINAL)
1.83M 73 OD
63 SO
NOTE:
BOND NO.6 FLEXIBLE GROUND STRAP
TO GATE POST AND GATE BY MOLDED
EXOTHERMIC MELD OR APPROVED
CLAMP-TYPE FITTING OF COPPER.

zZ
p oz
Q 7
Z
0
N CO J U
> z f z
LL
O = V Y
U Z
U ? N J
J ? 0] ^
U
¢ O
u
I W
b j z
Z a
E
TRUSS ROD AND BAND
N.T.S.
IUI IUI
L _I L _1
PERSONNEL GATE
ELEVATION
N.T.S.
CHAIN-LINK SECURITY FENCE DETAIL
N.T.S.

C

1629 (TYP.I

305 ITYP1 _I FINISH FLOOR
FINISHED OX SLOPE-I ELEVATION (FEE)
GRADE p.250X

EXISTING
GROUND

62

EXISTING
GROUND GENERAL NOTES:

1.
ALL DIMENSIONS
2.F IL TER FABRIC

ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE
AND GEOGRID SHAH EXTEND TO LIMIT

NOTED.
S OF COMPACTED FILL.
5

COMPACTED FILL -
NOTE: ELEVATION OF FINISHED GRADE AT INTERFACE E X I T D ITCH
WITH BUILDING EXTERIOR. SHALL BE 152 BELOW FFE.
N.T.S.

I
DOE OF ROAD
R = 20M R = 20M
GRADING AT BUILDING EXTERIOR
I
N.T.S.
9
ryo?T
fl?iu (TxP.I
I I
e
2p ? y
e
I e *i 77.YTOT-
I
1
TARGET
SERVICE, R_OA I
9 I
\
y?'
S T
i18u `
S,
? e
MAINTAIN .25X SLOPE TO EITHER . i CENTERPOINT
SIDE OF ROAD CENTERLINE OF CUL-DE-SAC
102.8293•
i.329M ? I y
h ?I
a
? z I sy
e
?I
TARGET SERVICE ROAD TURNAROUND E
N.T.S.
y
o?
?, I P
a

I
i
i
R = 20M
R
= 20M
I
EDGE OF POAD

VARIES VARIES
MANEUVER TRAIL CUL -DE-SAC
H.T.S.
3 3
I ?1

FILTER FABRIC
ITH
R 305 COMPACTED FILL (MIN)
GENER
AL NOTE 21
ISEE EXISTING
GROUND
MEDVAC LANDING AND BIVOUAC AREA
N.T.S.
4 5

a.
IC
y W
a
Y ¢x
F w UI
o
W
7 W J
N LD J r
Y> z f o
2 u N
Y u
u ¢ . o
£ N z
w ¢ Q
J
J (A GO
0 -1
Q ¢ d u
o n
£ a uu f
w
b S j
?Y Q
E
C
C
1 C ? '*
5
BIVOUAC AREA
I
j GENERAL NOTE
E
3.OSM 10.973M 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. u
C
I 3.658M 1.658M 5.658M
I
I
SINGLE SHEAVE CAST
I ALUMINUM STATIONARY 127 DIA. ALUMINUM BALL
j TRUCK (SEE NOTE) e
STROBE LIGHT 6
n
CONTRACTION JOINT (TYP.)
I (SEE SHEET 5-301 FOR DETAIL) }}}}
?q.
1 SWIVEL
j SNAPS
Y•
>8?
fMI76 0
i
N.N. TOP DIA
I
I ?
-10 BRAIDED
I POLYPROPYLENE
1 HALYARD 5 WALL THICKNESS
I ALUMINUM FLAGPOLE
romovEo
I
I .n......a...r..a
PLAN 52 REINFORCED CONCRETE PAD
j •13 a 300 O.C. E.W. AT N.T.S. A-0
j 63 BELOW TOP OF SLAB 1X
F. 11. F.
-4:
230 CAST
I ALUMINUM CLEAT a,lp _
1 FINISHED GRADE FINISHED GRADE -
I
152 CAPILLARY WATER BARRIER SECTION FILTER FABRIC (SEE NOTE 1) F
N.T.S.
NOTE: o
1. FILTER FABRIC SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF CAPILLARY 750 ALUMINUM r- [p
WATER BARRIER. MIN. FLASH COLLAR I $ U [
BIVOUAC PAD z l
CAULKING COMPOUND 9 w
N.T.S. ` Z w
¢ Z
0: 7
SEE PLANS FOR LENGTH z N
w0 Z J
OF CULVERT EXTENSION 4 HARDWOOD CENTERING WEDGESta• - U' J ¢
BLACK ASPHALTUM PAINT ON •? •? L:r.v y > Z ? ?
EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE .v.e
SURFACE OF POLE AND SLEEVE '"' ••' ••'
ASSEMBLY BELOW GRADE TAMPED AND DRY SCREENED SAND d O = U y
::•:
16 GA GALVANIZED CORRUGATED STEEL TUBE y ¢ o
_ 130 MIN. BUTT DIA 4 WELDED STEEL WEDGES -• z w w
13 THICK WELDED STEEL PLATE N
z z
-----DIRECTION OF FLOW .- 150 'f•A•''? NEAT EXCAVATION
---- _ 19 DIA z 600 COPPER
-• - 13 THICK STEEL SUPPORT PLATE ¢ cc Qu
...... ~
::.............. w
CLAD GROUND SPIKE t d OO N
CLEAN OUT DEBRIS FROM INLET WELDED TO BOTH PLATES CONCRETE 1 u E
NOTES
100 b b J Z
1. RELAY EXISTING PIPE ENDS AS REQUIRED TO ELIMINATE
ANY EXISTING OPEN JOINTS. 450
EXISTING ATERIAL OF NEW TO MATCH PIPE MATERIAL OF 600 MIN 5 t
NOTE:LOCATE TRUCK ON NORTH SIDE OF FLAGPOLE £
3. SLOPE OF PIPE EXTENSION TO MATCH SLOPE OF WITH STROBE LIGHT 180 DEGREES FROM TRUCK.
EXISTING PIPE.
CULVERT PIPE EXTENSION FLAGPOLE
N.T.S. N.T.S.
> zoe
C-513
I
C
C
1 2
3
4
GENERAL NOTES:
1. CONCRETE SHALL DEVELOP A MINIMUM COMPRESIVE STRENGTH
OF 29 MPO IN 28 DAYS.
2. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
3. GEOGRID SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF COMPACTED FILL.
TOP OF
70 BERM
A
B
TARGET
BOOT
NORTHING
EASTING
1A 3832102.34 269832.45
1B 3832103.11 269833.87
2A 3832103.67 269834.89
26 3832104.44 269836.31.
2C 3832D9D.49 269642.06
2D 3832091.27 269843.48
3A 3832104.99 269837.33
38 383210517 269838.75
4A 3832106.32 269839.77
48 3832107.10 269841.19
4C 3832093.15 269846.94
4D 3632093.92 269848.37
SA 3832107.65 269842.21
SS 3832108.42 269843.64
eA 3832108.98 269844.65
B
TARGET
BOOT
NORTHING
FASTING
6B 3832109.75 269846.08
6C 3832095.80 269851.82
60 3832096.58 269853.25
7A 3032110.31 269847.09
78 3632111.08 289848.62
BA 3832111.64 269849.53
8B 3832112.41 289850.96
BC 3832098.46 269856.70
8D 3832099.23 269858.13
9A 3832112.96
98 3032113.74

ICA
3832114.29 24
108 3832115.07 A
fOC 3832101.12
100 3832101.89 6
C C

FIRING LINE
.16 DEFORMED STEEL
REINFORCED BAR
(SPACED 610MM)
RAILROAD TIES
(152 204 2439)
RAILROAD TIE STEP SECTION DETAIL (PLAN)
N.T.S.
IC
BZO TARGET BOOT LOCATION oa?
y_ moo- _
RAILROAD TIE
STEP SECTION
.a U Z f
a z
n
r+16 DEFORMED STEEL
REINFORCED BAR W O j w J
N O J a
RAILROAD TIES
(152 204 x 24391 Y> Z Y o
1 0 2 U N
r......a.....' ....' .....' .....'...
8v a o
f W w
• I" N Z
Z
.' •....... ¢ (n m J
J O J
~¢
n x N
3 a C)
F w
J Z
RAILROAD TIE STEPS (SIDE VIEW) a s _

N.T.S. q t
S f
tl
$
NOTES:

1. STEPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF TREATED RAILROAD TIES
AND SECURED WITH #16 DEFORMED STEEL REINFORCING BARS
DRIVEN VERTICALLY THROUGHT FIELD-DRILLED HOLES.
THE BARS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM LENGTH OF 460MM AND
SHALL BE LOCATED ON A 610MM SPACING.

FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE EXTEND THE FULL LENGTH OF STEPS.
2
.
?
i 2e0
C -514
4 5 _ ..,.,.
W i/ 1 I 58J 1 2 ?Vl 11
L 41
8 I I
I I I I 1 I Ig I I
I 1 I I I 1 I I 9 I
1 1 I I I 1 I I 19 101 OB
I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I
I I I I 1 I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I 1 1 I I I
?I 1 I 1 I I I I
VI I I I I ; I I I ? I
I l I I I 1 I I
LLI i i j iAPGEi BOOT (TYP.1 I I 1 I I
I I ?'
01_ - 2C2D? _ 4S 401 _ 6??6D? _ BSBD?? 105 L10D
I I I I I I I I I I 1
? I I I 1 I I I I I 1
I I I I I I 1 I I I
I I I I I 1 I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I I I I 1
? I I I ? I I I 1 I I
I I I I I I I I 1
I '1 I I I I I I 1 I
BZO
N.T.S.
152
52
152 PVC
BZO TARGET BOOT FINISH GRADE
HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINT
100 X 100 WOOD POST
FOR PANELS (BY OTHERS)
CONCRETE T152 PVC
PLAN VIEW SIDE VIEW
N.T.S. N.T.S.
TARGET BOOTS
N.T.S.
1 2
SECTION q
N.T.S. C-514 L-514
C
C
E
F
1 95
19MM A-C
MARINE PLYWOOD
OMM CHARACTER
LINE WIDTH
1
0
50
1 ?77n
20
CON
FINISHED
TARGET BOOT
I SEE NOTE 41
SINGLE RANGE LANE MARKER
N.T.S.
400 METER LANE MARKERS
LANE MARKER TYPE CONTROL POINTA CONTROL POINT B CONTROL POINTC
NORTHING EASING NORTHING EASING NORTHING PASTING
4DOM LANE MARKERI SINGLE 3832271.40 269537.38 3832272.47 269537.97
400M LANE MARKER 1.2 DOUBLE 3832293.18 269579.41 3832294.23 269580.03 3832295.28 269580.65
4ODM LANE MARKER 2.3 DOUBLE 3832338.31 269579.05 3832339.31 259579.76 3832340.30 269580.46
400M LANE MARKER 34 DOUBLE 3632370.26 269602.99 3832371.22 269603.73 383237218 269604.48
400M LANE MARKER444 DOUBLE 3832400.83 269626.77 3832401.76 269629.56 3832402.69 269630.36
400M LANE MARKER" DOUBLE 3832430.00 269656.35 3832430.85 269657.21 3832431.72 269658.08
40061 LANE MARKER&7 DOUBLE 3832457.31 269685.36 3832458.12 269686.27 3832458.92 269687.18
4DOM LANE MARKER 7.8 DOUBLE 3832483.05 269716.02 3832483.78 289717.00 3932484.51 269717.98
400M LANE MARKER &9 DOUBLE 3832506.91 269748.11 3832507.59 269749.12 3832508.27 269750.13
4DOM LANE MARKER 9.10 DOUBLE 3832506.31 269793.20 3832506.92 269794.26 3832507.53 269795.32
400M LANE MARKER 10 SINGLE 3832549.06 269816.41 3832549.64 269817.49
SOO METER LANE MARKERS
LANE MARKER 7ypE CONTROL POINT A CONTROL POINT B CONTROL PONTC
NORTHING EASING NORTHING EASING NORTHING EASING
800M LANE MARKER I SWGLE 3832430 .76 269171.59 3832431.85 269172.13
BOOM LANE MARKER 1.2 DOUBLE 3832491.59 269204.42 3832492.64 269205.04 3832493.69 269205.66
BOOM LANE MARKER 23 DOUBLE 3832550.79 289241.52 3832551.81 26924220 383255283 269242.87
SOOM LANE MARKER 34 DOUBLE 3832607.55 269282.42 3832808.51 269263.16 3832609.47 269283.91
BOOM LANE MARKER" DOUBLE 3832661.57 269326.99 3832682.49 269327.78 3832663.42 269328.58
BOOM LANE MARKER 58 DOUBLE 383271277 269375.13 3832713.63 269375.99 3832714.49 269376.66
BOOM LANE MARKER &7 DOUBLE 3832760.31 269426.06 3832761.12 269126.97 3832781.93 269127.89
BOOM LANE MARKER 73 DOUBLE 3632804.74 269480.29 3832805.47 269181.26 3832806.20 269482.24
BOOM LANE MARKER BA OOl1BLE 3832845.51 269537.30 3832846.19 269538.32 3832846.87 269539.33
BOOM LANE MARKER 9.10 DOUBLE 3832882.49 269596.81 3832883.09 269597.87 383288170 269598.93
BOOM LANE MARKER 10 SINGLE 3832914.30 269656.16 3832914.83 269657.25
RANGE MARKER LOCATION

0
ACE
POINT B
4 5
NOTES:
1. MARK ODD NUMBERED LANES WITH BLACK NUMERALS ON A WHITE
BACKGROUND. MARK EVEN NUMBERED LANES WITH WHITE NUMERALS
ON BLACK BACKGROUND.
2.1NSTALL EACH MARKER USING 2-100MM x 100MM TREATED WOOD
POSTS. PLACE POSTS IN 152MM DIA. PVC PIPE TARGET BOOTS"
INSERTED INTO THE GROUND. FOR ADJACENT LOCATED
MARKERS. DOUBLE MARKERS USING A SINGLE SHEET OF
PLYWOOD WITH 3 WOOD POSTS SHALL BE USED.
3. BOTTOM OF MARKER 914MM ABOVE GROUND.
4. SEE SHEET C-514. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS. FOR TARGET BOOT
DETAILS.
.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
FINISHED GRADE
CONTROL POINT A
(SEENOTE?41
•
DOUBLE RANGE LANE MARKER
N.T.S.
2440
92626 A-C
MARINE PLYWOOD
rZOMM CHARACTER
LINE WIDTH
A G
<g ?;
ACE © ?7i Yepp
POINT C A

J? miw

z I
g w
?I YW ¢ Z
4 z
W
Z

uo Z N
J

N 7 W
C7 J
?
Y> Z E o
O
£ U U ?
Q
F O

Z U, Z
N OD J
J
Q
U
0_
m
a o
w
n a ?
f a

! 1

200
?C9515

C
C
E
F
NOTES:
STONE CHECK DAM
1. SEE PLANS FOR LOCATIONS OF STONE CHECK DAMS AND TOP OF STONE
COORDINATES AND ELEVATION OF CONTROL POINT. CONTROL POINT
CONTROL POINT ELEVATION REPRESENTS THE MINIMUM (SEE NOTE t)
) I
DITCH BOTTOM
ELEVATION OF STONE ACROSS FULL WIDTH OF DITCH.
2. USE CLASS 1 OR CLASS B STONE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE REOUIREMENTS FOUND IN ARTICLE 1042-1 OF THE 1(2 2 1
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. --- ---'-'--'- '---
3. FILTER FABRIC SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF PLACED STONE. FILTER FABRIC (SEE NOTE 71
SECTION B
N.T.S. C-514 - 19
DITCH
457 MIN. I
I TYP.1
B
C-514 C-514 EROSION CONTROL STONE
(SEE NOTE 21
TOP OF STONE
CONTROL POINT
(SEE NOTE 1)
FILTER FABRIC (SEE NOTE 3)
STONE CHECK DAM
N.T.S.
i
N.T.S.
NOTES:
1. THICKNESS OF CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 152MM.
2. SEE SHEET C-002. VICINITY AND SITE LOCATION MAPS. FOR LOCATION OF
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.
I J
GENERAL NOTE:
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
GROUND LINE
d r
OR WOOD POST Zvi
no II
ABRIC ?$
FILTER FABRIC SKIRT
SECTI A
C ON -514 - 14
N
T
S ""n
mia
?G
.
.
. _

VARIES
(3048 MAX.)
457 MAX.
I IN ACCORDANCE WITH
NORTH CAROLINA DEPT.
2
I OF ENVIRONMENT AND Y W
NATURAL RESOURCES d
4 2 w
z J
O
PREFABRICATED MATERIAL
j ATTACHED TO STEEL 8
z 2
z
z
OR WOOD POSTS -
W o j
° O
A ;m c
0
514
GROUND LINE C-5 Y> w a z
w
d ° 2 U f
°
ELEVATION f w w
<c N
J Nm
O z
a ¢ a
SILT FENCE Z

N.T.S.

Y a o
w 0
N

a b w

j
m m
w
m
L
NOTES: fr d r
1. FOR SILT FENCE SPECIFICATIONS. CONSTRUCTION. AND MAINTENANCE
REFER TO SECTION 6.62 OF THE CURRENT NORTH CAROLINA EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL AND SHEET C-515• -I A
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES.
2. SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED AT THE LIMITS OF CLEARING
I SEE SHEET C-148. CLEARING LIMITS).

n zee
C 516

a
t
E

m_
A 3
m r 9
a
r
0 -6
m m O a•
r
g
z m
a A
0
n a m <
z r N
m m Z
0 1^z
a ' m _
a Pzi
ago
fl,
00? 001 0 Oat OOZ
N
v
A
t
AI0?Pl3V
9LIrV f
•1N3MIW1 'O111N03 A3AUnS OI130030 VNI'10NV3 NINON V SI 9LLP 'C
•NOILMIS30
1NIOd HIM 'SOOZ UV3A 'SN33NION3 JO SdW3 03dMVIS ONV 31383NO3
NI 13S SN3M M A3ANa5 SSVH9 03100 .9l.t 3V OOZP13 ONV 001 P13 •Z
'SV38V ONV11311 3NV SV311V ON31VN 1111 •l
LS310N
OWL? LL L•98tUa 9ZC•410CC99 9lLP
69L-LZ YSY•ZZ9UZ Z60'6662CSE OOZM3
Z?L'ZZ 995'ZSSLIZ lC2•Z662C9C OOLP13
tZ) N011YA313 IX) ONIlSV3 (A) ONINIUON old
S1NIOd MUNOZ A3AN0S
•lfl-0 OW '9Z1-0 'SZL-3 S133NS NO 03NI.430 NO11110N30 '6
•NIONS 3SIX03HAO SS3lNn LLC 01 O30VN0 36 01 31V SUMS 1111 •6
'NNONS 3SIA113N10 SSTM SU3131 NI 3NV 531VNI011003 ONT SN011TA313 11V 'L
'S11M11 ONINV313 NO! gi L-3 133NS 33S '9
"SN3131 '660AVN NI 1ad11O VIVO 13AN0S IMIU3A 'S
'5113131 'fit 3NOZ 'CeavN '1110 NI Ind111D vivo .13A1111S 1VINOZI110N '?
'3111ASLNIIN '1131N30
IUOdd115 aNV 0NIN33NION3 .PINY •S•0 As 03NIVl6o vivo A3Auns 'C
'MSZ'0 IV MONS SWA1131NI UnDIN03 11V 'Z
•XI111VM 133HS 311 1N3S3Nd3N L33NS SIN! NO MONS S13018 'I
LS310N 1V93N30
5 {V
?
p
YlllW
-sit- - - 0101- -
r I
''-

e

F

A3N ONI1SIX3
011303
C
G 1 l

pa.
,. , " ? rat' •? ,,.
lls
W-R131N33 OVO11
sv3NV ONV11311 9?L-3 11PL-3
3N1133N1
NOO1N03 HONIN
1v3ldL1 'dAl
SMIN03 tOrV i
Nolivls V15
33N3.4 1N3M33V1dt3 13ONV1 AIUMV.441 AVVNDIlv15 115
am 13080 smova N
OVd 3131ON03 1N3133v1603 831N33 N360d 3d
113N1O3 ONIOlIaB 31YDS 01 LON 'S'I'N
ONIKLUON N
113131 U31VA lN31133V1d13 130MV1 AN1NV!!I ONtAO1 1111
ON11106 1IOS 11313x111111 M
Kars 1131311 M
NOILVA313 11001.4 03NSINId add
310NNVN HUM ANV11NV5
NOllvn313 13
31OdN3MOd ONIISV3 3
311111 Ana 3dld 13315 031VDOULW dso
1NVU&N MIA 3M 11831M32 3
083Z 1NOIS 3111YO OZfi
AM ON 313N3N03
1T1S303d 31ov3
owl-M
j
4
3
I
t 7 '? d r-1
1
1

` KEY xyl N
i ,
STONE CHECK^DMI t\1t ?'
t CONTROL POINT ?F C-14 -146
i
_ l N 3832025.60
-E..269907.11
?'
1pF
"'
i EL T7s00 ?
t C-14 -144 -14
` 1 J
i
i tt,t
f EXIT DITCH CENTERLINE t m A
8KARE C-14 C-14 C-14 -13 -126 -12
1 N 3832018.46
E 269909.13 Qt 1 -
CE
RyINE. 1T. GT' [-1381C-13J-13+-13
,
El 16.32 f^ - ? ,
`
i N 38 000 -12
PLANTED PIN tPEES v i f C-13 3C-13
-13 C-12
?, ? o oil
i i
"
3s 1?

s t
i i o

i t
\ 7
NOTE51
1. SEE SHEET 0-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
i t SECTIONS. FOR CC ROAD UPGRADE AND
CLEARING LIMIT. _
i
` ,
t 2. SEE SHEET C-513. MISCELLANEOUS '

? i
i
?

'
` FOR EXTENDING EXISTING

CULVERT.
I?
iR'IW"181W.ZiG
?
? i
L
?
? i 1 3. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS
i
`
?
` \ DETAILS. FOR GRADING AT BIVOUAC
t SECURITY BAR F
?
?
?
, ? i IE t 7 i
~ ? AREA. ii'W87a'a?-
?
t ?'
i
t 4. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK iT
? ?
t i SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
r
s
N 3831900 S. SEE SHEET 0-512. MISCELLANEOUS _

1 DETAILS. FOR EXIT DITCH GRADING.
STI 7
f S. SEE SHEET C-516. EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL. FOR STONE CHECK DAY DETAILS.

M
t
`•
? ? jl' 1 f
ifs' ?
Ih?t•?
7. SEE SHEET C-108. SITE LAYOUT PLAN.
FOR BIVOUAC CENTERLINE ELEVATION.
°
_ .

{ w
Z W
_ _ Y 6p Z
'1'.'?"_`V-'-y....Y•..,Y..'.? Y a
610' CcSP }.
N ]817887.94
'' a
20 z w
w
1
1
V6E
6!2
?
-in
N
L
9 = z
610w CSP
N 3831886.07
O
= u Q
E 269950.86
INV EL 16.24 u 0]
= W G
ST
T
I
I
cp
=
a Z
U,
SE
O G10M9 CSP Q W
to 07
7 N 3831862.44
I. 269957.47 -i
Q U)
4 Z
INV EL 16.63 a o C
610M1 CSP u
2
N 7837879.04
269959
68 w
~ z
IN
.
EL 16.65 N
e a
?' oc
PLANTED PO C TREES PLANTED PIM1. TREES N 7831800 Z S

s s s
b
0 20 40 80m
C 1:600

.2w
31
D
r.
B
A
4 I 5 -
1 1 L 1 :3 1
1
t t 533W x 381W CSP-ARCH
't
it N 7872263EL
NY269893.97.75
?\ E
t t -0 - -
t R^. ..1f•
ttt t t `
t tit t t
' \tt t
t tt 1 l
16
`tktt
t
of t t ..
t t? 9
tt
I
C
t
1T•259846. 1 8 ?/
' EL 1694 l t
' 3l t
! O t I
tit t 1
t^ ^ .' ' It t !
I 533MM x 381 CSP-
t E 269974.36 6t t
INV EL 18.92
120 F?RING
IHE U t t
66 ?
918
1tU. ? 1
f
1
z
4
0
tt t ` N 3832300
5339" 381 CSP-ARCH
N ]$3227&IS PkANCEO PINE FREES `t
E 267909 941-73 -126 -12
t t
?, I i 9 t -138 C-17 C-17 C-73
-12 i
y ? `, s ' c-13 -137 !
`t 573UN x 391181 CSP-ARCIT C-12 i
OY t t t t C-13 -13 C-12 !
' 02224.
0 t t '>"4ES"= t f 1
• /i 7 SITt20 E 2INVE'EL 77.08 t t t t i Ii
t
S T t t i t t t t
t ' SJJW %t7B/W 'SP-ARCH - t t sit
N 2W9 7150 t t`tt / t ti jl
SIT ' I t t ? tt t t
6 f ?? T 1 t c ' t». ' tt NOTES.
\( 7 N 533 219781 CSP X t,? t
gj / i JJ ++•• t t 1. SEE SHEET C-109. SITE LAYOUT PLAN.
6 948.59 y/ t f t FOR MEOVAC CENTERLINE ELEVATION.
7B NV 7.03 ?6f? t a
01 t 7 1d7 .07W C%- y t f tt 2. SEE SHEET C-109. SITE LAYOUT PLAN.
E4. FOR BUILDING FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS.
7.00 IN 3YB69 y1T,Ot? / f i t
' N 78322 3. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
/ SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS. Fig
f \ l ' ! ` 5,3W x 38 CSR- CHi` f t tt 1. SE?GET6EIPLACEMENTTAF IONART INFANTRY
i N???333???33383217 t EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
T ?E1N269" 7.31 f L
5. SEE SHEET C-503. STATIONARY INFANTRY
a`R. / tt l• tt 53 3 x 4.9 I
W+C/`-ARCH y ??" ttt TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR DOABLE SIT -6- -
tt x iWt t 2699 .68i j - ttt t EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
t N 3832134.86 INV .9,8' NEOVAC,LAN I AREA t r
E 2 664`.33 I 6. SEE SHEET C-506. FIRING BERM. FOR
1 EL 76. 37714 Y 3B CSP- CN CENTERLINE L 7.66 t tt ? GRADING AT FIRING BERM.
la 4 ;/,31132.16 7 1„' t .• t
69937 . - / t 1. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS
IT 3 33W x 81W INV E 6.97; f t tt DETAILS. FOR GRADING AT NEOVAC ?a
N 383 5.71 LANDING AREA. >.e
t 126 L/1611 S33W ]B1MI PEAR ?/ tt t
z
N 3872153.6 SET SHEET Cit2. MISCELLANEOUS z
6{ t / t t DETAILS. FOR GRADING AT BUILDING > W
i + {d ` E 26E`74.6 ; EXTERIOR.
Z
(/yt J i t t ?t 9. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS Z
¢ w
7 - f t DETAILS. FOR EXIT DITCH GRADING. S -,
5 .CSP- CH* '?? , ] 537W Jet 10. SEE SHEET 0-512. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS. E -i
-f!I a
o f x 7B 70.90 t FOR TARGET SERVICE ROAD TURNAROUND.
.91 E 2 16.40 t? tt Y j a Z
"'?`•w /E 6.95 11. SEE SHEET C-514. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.
r„f? 5' x 81 CSP-A ` t p 1-1
t _,t " t FOR 42g•BERM LOCATION AND GRADING.. _
.N- 632117 5 C tEDVAC LANDING AREA DETA L a p
1y? E 33` CSP-M7 to CENTERLINE EL 17.68 f m p
3. - SIM c -AR ,16 .8 INV EL 6.93 t Ia m z
NV x.89 1 Nt3832100 tO a
.11 ` J O y
Y L t t ? ? ti ai ? ¢ .z.
e j O
S33W3 iW CSP-ARCH 7 N 8
c K ty? ?T ; S33W 0 381W -ARC' E 269990 11
t ppp z
W % tW -ARCH - `' N 3832089.3300 I EL 16 1
692 667?'.:Sa ,+ ` 1 Y6EE'T66A0•
t? -> W x tW C -MCNz S33W 381W SP-ARC o - x1# t `O r"'`•"
17 DIT CENTE INE N 3B 076.93/ o '•?
LT 3872 12 ° 32 5.5y7 E 9967.5 t1 « tt ?a„a
1 IL219.89 81 f / f ? ` - IN26 1658 IxV EL 16 9 1° r t t 0 20 40 GO.
a ?...n
:< saa
t 1,600
2

4
I
1 2 3 4. 5
E
E
EE? 11 JC-i+1441C-14?
SIT
`s
d
W'B67i'6iST•?
?? ...
R11715, E CK OAJF
99
3 ° z E
9R Ot z
J
V J W
W
0 0
9 a
0
_ K
V W O
CONTROL MINT
O
N ¢
J
W M
a ¢ z
? o p
a ¢
? t- M o
e a = ?
##
a i f
M1.73 _
1 2 3 4 5 ?"'?

LJ 817 (1 - - _78.0 - _ ,t
? s rdt s _ RaF IL
0 - "" _ - _ _ `te•
.
- t t SIT 33 _ 32300
, t

P t st C-18 C-11 C-14 -13 -12
-126
!
- - - " ^ B33W x 361 MM CSP-
1
67
- ? 533W x
CX N 383229
E 269647 B/W CS
-ARCH
/?
41
?t ? ? ` ? t , , 1
t`
t
-778 C-17 C-17 C-77
N 78722
9.
E 26
9650.18
INV EL; 17.33.

.INY Et 1

+
T
.73 ? _
SIT
?
t
t t
s t
t t
-12

C-17 C-13
- _ - - 1 ?

, ? 53
? ?
•''
?
W x SBiW CSP-ARCH
- t
C-12

^ - EXIT O7TCX
t
E 2695Ji4.3A
' NV EC 17429 N
NTERLINE +
t j 817 72 1
t 872230.22

5EL21i 21 SIT 30 ,
t t
tt tt
C-73 -13 C-13

- a
t , t t
t t t IT 37 ?--
? t
t
! t _
^

•
- -

1 ..•, t
533M x 781W CSP-ARCH
N 3832214.66
EIN EL 19T2S.709
?.?7? ? ?
s
? SIT 23 tt
? t
/ 557W x 7B1'W CS

S`i T 22 N 7832193.01 t
7 s

s

s
"-ARCH
t

o ES,
/
l
+ _ ^ ? \ ? VBE
21? OB
t
I t I. SESEE SHEE C-501- "CAD CTIpISi FOR ROAD SECTION51 DE11ALK
CENTE
INE
IT SIT ?,
s N
t
?+
t
l
?
/
]8322
/ E 269605.tq+
EL 1 :70 .. PC
1
STONE CHECK DAM
COhTR0. POINT
N J 32233.07
I
? t
t
Z. SEE SHEET C-502- STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT

P
AC
IENT DETAILS
_
76V9.79 s
E
2 ? t EY
I
E
.
t L
1 2 3• SEE SHEET C-503. STATIONARY INFANTRY

t

` ? t

tt E%IIt OITCN CEN7ERLI
N 372791.79

`\t E 269710.(1

.15
fits 17
1
SSS 81 CSP i1RER ++? t
872180. s ?

x^39??

Ef?-V8L23. ?t 1
E
•
/

a
T
? ? TARGET EYPI.ACEYENT. FOR DOUBLE SIT
EIPLICEIENT DETAILS.

4• SEE SHEET C_51 2,
MISCELLANEOUg
DETAILS. FOR EXIT DITCH ORADINO.
? ? ` f '• t tt t
?
s S. EMSEE PLACEMENT FOR POBERCENTER
!
t EXI6T OI 4C T TCX ERLI
t N ]8327
971 0.90.
t E 22
? .
MY
N DI?63ERII i
_ EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.

SEE SHEET C-512
MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS
t
EL 77.10
.,
y 2698
/EL 17.07 .
G.
.
FOR TARGET SERVICE ROAD TURNAROUND
LAYOUT

A
• .
t y
P
0
" .
t ?
t ?
x75.2 ?
A SIU1f

? / s 7. SEE SHEET Cit6. EROSION AND SEDIMENT

CONTROL. FOR STONE CHECK DAY DETAILS.
t IT DITCENTINE
3872 T?82
E 269 7. 8 t t0 ;ns ? s
,:.: ;= s
EL .87
TAR?SERVI R D t

j EXIT DITCH CE
N 787x172.60
E 269820.21
EL 16.87 ERL IYE
t
t
?
- j STONE CHE
N 787277
E 269823. CK DAM
.75
77
/ - - -
EL 17.70 N 38327

- PLANT. PINE EES
/ t

0 20 w eom
oil
z z z
tC
W
>
w
O N
i
1:800
1 2 3 4 ?
E
t
1 C
((j
s d?
C
TARGET EIPLACEIENT. FOR SIT
i1RI1.-Y71RRR1?
G!-?
z
E
3 W
fi Z W
¦ = X
g
a? Z W a
J yt
7 to ? 0, a
y`> i a Z
U 2
W O
H m Z
Z W a
j N
R 2
a o 0
u a
u
J Z
a a = ?
A f ? E
?C-134
1 2 3 4 5
533W z 787
N }872720.7

E 269247.49
EL 17
5
IN CSP-ARkX

1
? •• '?.??/
- - - r 41w•••

-v f _ T ? I
- - - - ? ` t
?

?r -
r
? •0 r

,
t ' TAROF,TrSERNIGI;u?O 'a
Nt `?ussff
p1
\_`

1 REY 0.AM N

.

i
V
T781yE7 SERYIC

.`
RD11?10°' -
- -T
_ _
_ Q
i
I
r i
r

?
? r auf`
O1 tl tutt`
TV
, ` tl
9tv
?

517 4
-74 -146
C
y 1 ARR7ER _ ,
r j
_ N 38323
? RTE 5
??
5•? CC
- r STONE'CXECR CI(Y
cow AM PDIlM N ]B}270TXSCTENTbRL7?lE? s
269482
1? d
77
+?' t4,0 ? r C-14 -714 -14
?

?

? _ _
r _
41 7872278.01
r E 269
23
}3
2 .
-
1r
ot
A?
EL 77.45 STONE 6tiE2t?DA)1 C-14 C-14 C-14 -13 -12
-126
?
•r_,:< r ? _ _ _ _ _ _ _. .
E5 -78
.0
8 4
pi CONTROL R T7
T
269
-138 C-17 C-13 C-t3
_ _ '. _ _ "' _ - _ _ _
ARGET SERVICE 4
8.pt
slltll'
_ EL t7.95y?'}lt0. -727
-137 C-73
_ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _18
0 ° \
`
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
. _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -?
• x CENTERL IfiE'tf
Ad EXIT DIT
st
N
832260
29 _ C-17 -13 C-12
t
s
3
.
;6?43T.
9
3 W CSP-ARCH ?
2
.SS3W z
8
N 7832]02. 2 EXIT DITCH CEN
11
N 3832702 TERLINE
`
t t- ^
4At`
`
E 269244.5
1. EL 17.
t J .
E 269244.01 _
TERLINE
_ _ _ _ _ _ _6%L7 -DITCH CEN _
_ ?
TERLINE
EL 77.93 E 26 i05 725
EL 17.44

? S ` ?1T,Q NOTESt
? 1. SEE SHEET C-SOt• ROAD AND SIDEMALR

\ SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
t
` 2. SEE SNEETC-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY

EMPLACEMENT DE7A115.
N 38322
3. SEE SNEE7 C-072. MISCELLANEOUS
.1 v DETAILS. FOR E%IT DITCX CRADIND.
4. SEE SHEET 0-512. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.
FOR TARGET SERVICE ROAD TURNAROUND
_ LAYOUT.
f S. SEE SHEET C-516. EROSION AND SEDIIENT
CONROL. fOR STONE CNECR OW pETAILS.

ALANi' 0 Cita: TREE^>
N 3832104 1

s
° N
s s

r WfFRagNmrWe-

0 20 40 60m
N800
1 ?

1 ® _ }j 3W x 387W CSP-ARCM
- N 3832594.99
154
16
'?\
'
j

i 0 1\ SIT 59
40 .
E 269
?
INV EL 11.59 . .
- - - '
C-14 -146
1870
/
r/ rPLANTEa
r IRE TREES
C-74 C-111 C-14
\ - -
t
d2
C-14 C-11 C-14 -13
y 53JTIN x 3
r ®
N 832580
/ 517 3T- \
' IN
SP-
99l
Ir

t
t\

-126
-138 C-11 C-13
- .,
E
269749.
V 1 ?INV EL 17
?
- - /
2r
50 \/ .-p-" i \
t \ -12 i
S1T
56 c }0 _
t 37 C-13
IC-13+-1
\

IT ss'
r `t i
\
•
Q
.?a•o - C-12

-13 -17 C-12
C

?
!
S
\ ffis i ?
?
1 \
t d t
_ 1
_ 1
^ - _ -- ,
7
1

x

OTES,
1. `SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
! - -
r
l ^\ ??-+'? ` = ° ' ` ?? 2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
1 t
t
{ •^
" ^ .
,,; l TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR FOR SIT
-
t
18,0 \ _ J
?
I
-...r'^r ,
•_?
?, i I -" EMPLACEMENT DETAILS. rF

t t `/ ?,
_
l C-503. 1ONARY
A
RT
3
E
E?
/ 537W x 381W CSP-}RCX FOR O"LE SIT
EMPL CEIENT.
TAARGET
- ,0f
1 N 3872147.27
E 269803.09

J EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
1 ixv 17.56 - ..-
- ' 4. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.
-

1 FOR TARGET SERVICE ROAD TURNAROUND
i?
` LAYOUT.

-ARCH
QMM x 78iW C52
3832411.92 ' ^
',
y - ,? - .v^=
?•.!
- _ r
S. SEE SHEET C-504. MOVING INFANTRY TARGET

"'?
j
B• 269794.60

r ! - - - _ -

- '

- - ' - EIPLACEIENT. FOR MOVING INFANTRY
- -
-
WV
V EL 17.57
.? - .r
IT-39 ?_ t
- - TARGET EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
\
;
--?19,0? ,-- •-- - b __._r
tt ,.
/( 2:
Y
i
_ o _
_ 9
W
' _
`

r /? / f9
3T N 3832400,
CN ?vWr a C7
1\ r r N 783237 7 Y 2 Q
t
' t?j??I6^
\IN V EL61'A.
t t 1 _.., r
- Q W p
I 1 It{? li r r ?? t\ 1 \\ `1 Z y O

T\
N1
? •+ARCH i
Wr05P
'6' 8184
3235
r
i _

/
I r
`{
. \ \ _ //??
4517679 r { ` r
t -
_ _ . C
!r a U
t 10
MIT 1 t

.. 517/30
t
{ t
+ PiANTED P
NE?F$EE5 = 6
t\ t
t \ E
{

is. -
SIT 1 S
?
`
o
SIT 15
.?
? _ 1
t.t \
/
\ ;
' +'
;
`' 0 20 40 60.
_ _ _. _ _ - _
t i SIT 28
\'a f `
_ _
•
.
' % - 11600 ENOS
?
.ar
?C-135
1 2 3 4. ?
E
E
KEY RAN N
SIT ,& 514 72 \t C-11 C-111 C-f4
i
''SIT 70 + i 18.0 a c-17 -13 C-12 C-12
SIT 5
® 3T i?
SIT 68
MIT 2 t t \ / t \ SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
r?
EMPLACEMENT. F
li'/Fii'8?•T7.7-
?? FY
DETAILS.
-Os.T 64 Q Z
3 4 _ W E
` W
4 ? ¢ ? a
J
ZZ W a
CO ? J W
46 N IL
Q
O = U Q
, i6
a W o
N G
2 W in Z
a
J O y
a rc
Z
a ? o
u a
It
E Z LJ
SIT 61 e a = CC
SIT-43 -
a F
X1%1
?C-136
1 2 3 4 5 "'"?"""
r ! 1 t\ t 1 ? ?IY 73 \+
^
0?, f \\\ \y ?' r r/ J PLANTED PINE TREES
t+t + C-11 -116
\
/ .. - - C-11 C-11 C-11 -1J -126 42
®_ _ A\
SIT 83 PC 2 ®1 1 r -138 C-17 C-17
-12
C-17

r r? + J 18.0 y
t
7 7 ?_ /

/
0 ? tr ?. i t

N ®
t i /i

?
/
7
` / _ ? ` \B•
_ !
r IT 53
\
/' \ N 38725
N07E5s

/r
1B •O // Fill tv f. ,,, ! r t
A ?- "t
r t
\t t? , ? r 517 52

0?
?
``\ t. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
2. SEE SHEET 0-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET EMPLT.
EYPLACE14N7ADETANLS.FOR SIT
y
SIT 67 ! t y 1 + /
T 1
? 7 - ? e SEE SHEET C-505. POIIERCEN7Efl
3

_ _ i% F ? SIT 6

\\y \ r ++ ty \\ f

c t?_a??y ? /
i IT' ...r. -
t^
l + y ? / `\\
^ .
E/PLACE/ENT DET?AILPOBERCENTEfl
1. SEE SHEET C-572. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.
FOR MANEUVER TRAIL CUL-DE-SAC LAYOUT.
^ ^ \
/ \ +

t t
y
/
\
MOVING INFANTRY TARGET
501
T
r r]•O t ?,
+
t
t
` ® t
r
IT 19
\ 5. SEE SHEE
.
0-
INFANTRY
\
I f \ \\
® t
l \ \
\
\ 14 4
r
\ TMOET EMPLACEMENT
/
STT 65 \ t ?W r SIT IB• ?
t t
18.0 _
tt

\ \ \ ^? '• ,i^? Hi 8724

/ ? \
517 62
573W x 381W CSPZARCH t
, r .^-/Y lll-? ? _..r..y ?

?
- _ ?)?•S? stn.

y
t
N 7872711.56
?A E 269196.74
INV EL 17.51 ? " .;f"-'r ^ •y

r
l ? ?\
^r r .• f"1.?
^ ' TARGET SERVICE ROAD 1
'
,

, .,

\
_.
J /

PL AH LfD
12
&T
t ,
1 /
,
RIHE tR4E°y.
tSt `-
4 _____
_ \ /
_ ` S
'
-
S33W t% 381 W 11P-ARCH 111383 " E 269! BO

NY El\\8T\N9 awsw
i3
T
=
m
0 20 40
8600
i I
I
/// ?? /

0.0 _ ' ?
®SIT . [FT AM N
£0
Pt 1 jE _" 4E -T
t -_ - f Ilpl I _ l ,PLANTED PINE 7REE5 E-+86
`
o t l t`"1 SIT r95 f? C-18 C-1M L-18
--- /
IT ?'
` / /

E ;It ( r
IT 1
SITS
A141t I /

f C-18 C-18 C-18 -13 -72
-126
t ? ! ' ? ?. r -138 C-1] C-13
?
` -12

^..,.-----?....n..._... T 1
175

118 , '
. C-73 -133 C-1]
G_12
-13 C-12
/
_ _

?, a

^ t
N
NO7ESi

SITt93 _ _ _ 1. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEIIAL6
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
_

T tt
^
? 82' 2. SEE SHEET 0-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT

'
.. - 51
t
®571` 92 ? EMPLACEMENT DETAILS. iRRR-RII80[IF
?
f }
t
1 i
1
3. SEE SHEET C-572. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.
AD T
INARWNO
?
1T 110 a , t I' t FOR TARGET SERVICE RO
D
UYOUT.
B.0 W, ? .... ?
, SIT ` 97
lid Mf 16.0 / L/
/ SIT 81 a"?
ar

1, tT _
` /

t l` \ 1E11
' 8.0
1 /
ter.
,
_ _ _ _ \ 1 f111f
f
^ r `\. t ' 11 z
w
° w

`
J
z (L
^ - - _ - -
\ N 3832800 + N_ a

___
CIF E
1 ?
/
,
Y> W
z Q
z
y
1 f `? 1 ll?!/• t / 6 o
t / 1°( ((p(//^/p/1
so z w m Z
X
In C,
?
t h
•

` 1 / E illt rE'
i k"t 1M }
.
r
, ?

'
r
F, W ?
1
a'
\ 1 \ ?'
\`j0 0 /
JA( GET
SERVICE ROAD 6 - ? ^ J
I

0 20 40 60.
l L•800
?
.aAM
?C-137
a F
-3
? E
1
i 1 --. ? i to ?x N
1 C-1E6
0
ERVIC '8'
1 ? 1
4
C-14 C-141C-tI

tA C-1
C
a t° j -
C-14
C-13 C-13

\
IT 16 L
r
IT t C-1 ] -
C-13 -13 C-12
-I 6

?a f
? , Ma? N 1832500 NOTES.
Y\ \\
/, t. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
`-- `? _ { ' - -
INFANTRV
2. SEE SHEET EMPLACEMENT. FOR STATIONARY SIT
TARGET

-

/
, j

? SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.
SEE SHEET ET CSERVI MISCELLANEOUS DAIl5.
ND
L TARGET SERVICE ROAD TURNAROUND
LAYOUT.
?

i!•76'li'O?'fliT-

ANTE ihf i `5 -?`+4
4 \\ 7{ Q
Z= a
W J
z w o.
N 7832400 a Q
j y
/ % Y> w
Z Q Z

f /J/ N

N
m O

a
=

/
f. a °
W o
%
f
= B x; Atdf t? 1 i
j ?
Ej," F N a s ?'
z s
s ° f S S } m
m
20 s0 BOm
W ? 0
7:800

AIM
?C-138
D
C
8
F
D
C
B
A
I I L 4
1 ? E
t
\ IT 109 t s/
1 g8y N

sI, be
I / II
C-18 -t18 -18

- t
{ C-18 C-18 C-18 -12
-126
=
€ ( -178 C-17 C-1] C-17
1 1
t {
( {( -t2T j

1f T
\ {
1 t C-17 -1330-13
C-12
ua I i. r•: I r.?: r .o.
..
o
H I
'• ?`
.. C-13 -13 C-12

?
?i
1 \ N 7872800 Dv8
j
1 I
/ \
1
I xft'cn.n ;px;? /

'A'te \\

E%tT TCN L TERLI

11 XD7E5:
1. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.

n N 3832 6.18
26975 AA 1- 2. SEE SHEET 0-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY

EL 7.29 -
- TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
.. SI B9- EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
' 3. SEE IL
LGR D NG
M
1T
ET

STONE CHECK DAN
' FOR
ExiT
CN
.
S
0
DETA
CONTROL Pa
7
4.97
' \ ?
1 SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.
8. SEE
FOR MANEUVER TRAIL CUL-DE-SAC LAYOUT. p -
- -^-
- - E 269
82
-
EL 69 el '
-
' \
1
- - - ,
\
•
?,
5. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.
ICE ROAD TURNAROUND
T
R
.5T7 88 . ?'r l? \\
t 1
D?J /?' 1 V
FOR TARGE
SE
LAYOUT. y_

/ _
EXIT BITCH CENTERLINE G. SEE SHEET C-516. EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL. FOR STONE CHECK DAM DETAILS.
SSSW x 38I MM CSP=ARCH
N 3832677.82 - f 269772 76
- EL 11.36

-
- E 269709.57
INV EL 17.80
/ N 3832700 _-
x
Z
>
?
J -• ?^
-'®SIT
79 i
/', \\ ' it
1 I 1 t
i
q
1 9
,1
tl
:N W
Z Z
a Z
o
333W x t W CSg-ARCH
N 38326 ?B12.12 .

-
?

'
? \ 1 y>

..
G

U i
EE 169701.38
81
'INY EL 17
[T
78
%
I
" F V
O
_
.. ' Q
N

/JJ/M?'J/J
' vS1

77
?
\\? Fut:? f f

r4 N? t

' 1

H 01

a a

7
/ S17 76 \
9 ?o .
i
/
'?
' -.. . 2

r ! !
!
t 1
! ? ' f Lau ; v1
t ?
C-/
/
E NE£5 N
$$$8 E J
i ¢

75 ?
` . Y -""-
,
l _ -

E ROAD 5 _
TARGET SERVIC ^

- - -

g
?., `
l ?1
g
? m
SIT 78
0 20 80 SOm
w N 3872600 1:800
®•
W AAA
MC-139
1 E
E

.,..._?_._...._.....__ .. f'-`...?' - ,?_,...v..}?.....
SIT 138 SIT 139 .-.......-..,..._- i KEY PLAN
! / ??• ? t ? //o ? Y C-tI -1?6

IT 137
e 1 - 7
lzs
\\S1T 1
t S

. -
! [T 107 -126
- - -13
_ i
...
r
12
-
i
' o......-t...,•-?_..,. _._...,-..__._ a's"_,>FEi) $ C-t2
TtN
q
a »
- "
• -13 -13 C-12
1\
ASK
,!
!
?
/~ / 1 t
N 3832800

j
SIT
IT 133
/ SIT \ 1t
\ ! » - ?_ /
/ _
SJT 131

\ /
? ? /1y

?

^
f NOTESt

1. SEE SHEET C-5O1. ROAD I SIOE9ALK
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
/
t 3 t/ •' - . f? J
!-
^ T 103
!
A ?,// !
!ll
-
2• TSEE ARCETEEIPLACEIENTTAf STATIONARY INFANTRY
PC 3 SIJ/1/02 ` Y _
^ - - - - EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
51T 12T a

f
`SIT .129.

f

J/
3. SEE SHEET 0-505. POIIERCENTER
EMPLACEMENT. FOR POMERCENTER
EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.

SIT 12B
/ f
7
f 4. SEE SHEET C-SOb NOTING INFANTRY TARGET
EMPLACEMENT. FOR MOVING INFANTRY
TARGET EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
iT
126_
_ i 1 r 7 ? / i
_ ,
_„
r
r

- -SIT 87
1 51T tf} r \ 1 _?" `
3832700
v
z

' t
J y?
\
?
r/ r' r
r

? t:j
Z

te
/
f
?t .
17 t _
00 ,\
f
! c \t `
l
J / o
r
g
a?
Q'
z ?
a'
w

SIT go \
SIT ,?
?t? •/? '\\ y? z a z
w

?f .\ t1 t

PINE FRTES`?-' ,` j7 3 t

1 /((l/L` r rr!
SIT 851
Ir? r ,`
I rlg?0

N

e 0• u
w
Z K
t7
!t ROAD
^18,C .. rr TARGET SERVICE 6 $€[ _
SIT 97
_
I i re
/ rr ! /.
? ..Y
f
t r . r r yr t 72600 1:600 .n, ,?
ws P.+r r
•2PK
?C-140
I 7 Z d r7

1

' [ \
o

C
? t
y r'
SIT 161 ?
,1c /w r? a, KE, PLAN N
aH PINE 'RE 1 ARCH /
-
.S 1
862
E •2690 / 14
!%V 16166 / *r?y'x - 333- t1 381- CSP-ARCH

y
i 3832511.95
/ `1?
C-14 -146
)
:\
r
) E 8
r IM1EL8166'5
i?
C-f1 -1NC-14
ibt
Y
1 M 78728Sig "W-ARCH ?l
6908 % 11
E + Fst+
33- x 381W CSP-ARCH / L
y
'
C-14 C-11 -13 -12
•
•`\ _ •\? -
? 2
r
\
r INV EL 6.67 A 3832861.23
INV6EL916 66 - - ' - - ?'/w
? \
- - ---••---
r _
, -126
-138 C-13 C-13 C-13
\
' ? ,h}?i t y
?
, k
,
/'
' ?•
?
r -127
'
1
1
t?'?O
1V - _
r
'
r
p C-13 -133 C-13

P+
5171 51
-rr
"rr
t
C-13 -13 C-12 112
j

•
y \ v
t i

,
w
a SIT 163
y
?? y
n
?
?
.
/
t y f `
` r
\
\

( 533- x 381- CSP-ARCH
N 35372772.96
t t
, -
t
NOTES,
r ry INV EL 1688%
tt {? 1 1. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
i
\
a _ - _ t ytt r %
f
r
O 1
I r 2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
i
1
SIT
7 N SIT 53 p EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
-
t ?' t t
ivayIllP I t ry
i
f / J
/
WNW
533- x 381- CSP-ARC r
rr t

"y N 3832752.9]
M? 1
y
y
'
y

t
_
t 8269122.41
!
y
INV E
75:93 ++ 27
b
"' M
q
r
' t L
F t 1 f
"SIT-T25 ?^
e-
S 62

' H_3832I00 p =

_
lKtky t

-
-
+/ r+r
i
p W
u
W
`352 A
I ,! IT 121 Sli t S, ¦ Q
z m a
I

? ?
' ' 517 127 f ? = a
•?
\ / ?
y y
/ i
•? y SIT 122
_
x tR E
o
f 6

r t
/ 1 aN ?f
D inb: T.
r/ h

^ tl A \
•O St ?I \

?
r
c 0 U)
IX

m
I U

G
t

`• .
rr
j N
t H CSP- CH
ty, C
y /
872618 7
6917 09 ?t f h? 1 w
` .« 8 W
M

' x •
l r f 1
ia': ,1„»: / f , - ?? ' t
t r SITrt)5 ' ., r ' - EL 7.26 t
1l
533 x 1 W C$ ARCH Jl
.. 1: 92 362
ty V
r
®SIT 120 , wt An' EO PINE, TREES
\ N s a
is Q
•_ - ''y t 1 / `f. t »g 77.27
q` 1 '
0 20 40 60m
SIT 178 1
N 58326 1:500

.a4
?C-141
D
C
B
A
1 1
1 '1 Z d ri
E
t

/
f ,' /
. Bcx.pyey
,
? _. / i l
r C-tA -tA6
? C-14 -144C-l t
f IT 1 .
I
-12
C-tt C-N -17
r / -126
' -138 C-1] -1J C-13
r
' -12
C-1J -1]7 C-13

f PLANTED PINE TREES C-12
C-73 -13 C-12 x
gi
r? oil l
i
3

/
r `t,0 ? _ _
51
NOTE
/ 1. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
f / SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.

INFANTRY
A
II
ET C-
TIONA 2. TA
E
FOR S
T
ARGET
EMPL CEMENT.

? t
75
LT'' i EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
f '
' 3. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS. RM
FOR TARGET SERVICE ROAD TURNAROUND

j LAYOUT.
f t ' S
- / Iti7FR'8?3iF'
i
?

!( ' \ ' ; 11 fr ' ?
N 3832 - _

/ .
1 t l
! , 6
Y a Z
z`a

?J
/
f l s t ?,? ?a o. v

' -s' • 514 1 h' " o u a
,
M1
t . a w o

'
' Y N O
/
t 1
' ?, J d U, O

/ O
y C3
a
^. x n

1

N
w
~ 7:

20 so Born
7832 D O F800 ,
i
6 -m
-142
c
D
C
B
A
1 I z I 3 1
4 ' `?

f
E
f
1 2 3 4
E
i
-? REY 0.1M N
.. ' STONE CHECK DAY ""'"
CONTROL POINT Rf t:.. can-: ;rrC•s<?:;
E T bRC . T N7ERLINE N 38331.11.23 \ _ -
N 3 7101' 4 E 269566 C-14 _148
266. 56;.e9 EL 16.60 1 '
\ ;EL.
IT DITCH eENTER
LINE\, 26995551W CSP-ARCM 145, C-IN XIT dLTCN CENTERLINE 1 _ E 269577 -. 1. 16.45 13 -13 C-12
/ SIT 159 mail! 11
?
3WJx, S W CSP-ARCH
_.-..-. _ ?.... -._ ? -- ..' A ..
' E-269162.29 1 _ ..
/ INV'EL 16.54 _ I NOTES.
17.0 STOVE CHECK DAY _ 1. SEE SHEET 0-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
CON3i0T .. C"'6'•.?="'%'"".. SECTIWIS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
E 26907.46 w
1 336600 \ 2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
®SIT 158 EL TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
.. EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
1 3. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS
,_- 1 • DETAILS. FOR EXIT DITCH GRADING.
4. SEE SHEET C-516. EROSION AND SEDIMENT te<88RW8
CONTROL. FOR SICK CHECK DAM DETAILS.
w
w
N 3833000 ^ -
1
1•""i / \, 4 STONE CHECK DAY U
•,<_irS.t.__ - `--CWTROt-POfM At 4 2
SIT 1 „ ^ N 3832959.58 .. w
. E' 269640.50• " A - ' - It 6 Z 'r,
16.9( ?.....,?._. ,__....._._ Y C j Za
i
1 0 / sir 14 z
? J
•SIi 146 1 .. SII n 7 STONE OCHE .N7µ
ON L
..._-L..-? 7(3
83290T.
E 269664.1
EL 17.08 -- Y ¢ W D
\- EXIT 01 x CENTERLINE / N
IT 145 1 _? 11 N 38729 91 _ P1[3i7E0 Pi HE TREES p a
E 26966 21 6
/ 4 1 EL 16.8 ?z LL V C3
517 SJJW X 381W CSP-ARCH - - + w
781W CSP ARCH Z
lY..td2. - •-,.,,.,.•_ 1 N 3972891.94 533MM
1.? i 6 1 t ?? \ E 269662.85 N 3832 00.36 1 N - b
??/ --_. 1 1 •1 INV EL 16.96 INV6EL 16 96 11 N 3832900 ! i5
o -
' Sii
8 \\ 1 1 \? ,Pei ? ,- 1
w a w .
1 .1
__' _ a N r ? " 1 C 1 N .. . ; 0 20 40 60m
taw
.244
43
1 2 3 4 5 ?ww?w
I

I
1 2 3 4
E
E
\ { / ? 4 .. /' t\ \t /' t II BEY 0.W N
' E
., 1 X,1210, /? ;
~r r s
\ S T 1T \? /? + i C-N C-14 t-N c-13 -125
! q' /? { -126
`\ ??? ! I I \\ '4?' /? t -t 18 C-13 C-13 C-73
1 0 \ I/ /? - N 313]700 IC-13+-1331C-13 -12
? s y / - .. C-12
C-13 -13 C-12 1
ti? / i ? t i ? (1 j??
/ 'ate T ^?.
/? i I 17.0
SIT 75 / N07ES1
r I'3 _l ' y IT 6T 1. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS. _
2. SEE SHEET 0-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
S /? t C F II ._.• ?/ EMPLACEMENT TARGET EMPLACEMENT.
]. SEE SHEET C-505. POBERCENTER ?-
} EMPLACEMENT. FOR POIIERCENTER
EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
f /? SIT 6 f s s
S T 157 _ t
x 6
9
PC ,A" ul z
? = U
1 10
/? .(?(,t??/p \ -\? \ SITS115S' ! ? 3= N in
0 U) C,
11 IL
t N 18 =
`i TARGE SERVICE ROAD 8 t 6(
155 T 138 0 20 40 BOm
?? 1:800
mI?
C-144
1 2 3 4 5 +?"??
I
1 2 3 4 5
t
t

KEY PLAN

Ilk

a l
a

N'R76FBiGiFnR-

Q
E
3 y - ?
J Q Z
? 2

8 0:
7 Q
J
_? ? J O

- W
m
Y? a
sd c
`
O
= U
Q
42
V
S W
O
.
.. N O

2 U,
m 6
J
a O N
¢ IL
o Q
1
e a
E

y

.266
?
C-145
1 2 3 4 5 '•'???

T
h? a
at ?
n,l y? l
"t, t t
C-11 -116
V
?
t" 1 /
u -iMC-71
1
`
T
.
lt\1
N
t
'/ C-1? C-1A C-1A -77 -12
'126
PEANTFD Pih_
tttll tj t 5 BEES -138 C-17 C-1] C-13
ii"l M -12
c M 3833100
C-17 -733 C-73

, ,l
\ `
1 C-12
C-73 -13 C-12
\
10
t ttl` \ t
Asa \ t \ t ,
l
\ 1
1 l^j?
l `o
t EXIT ITCx CENTERLINE
, NOTES:
N 787
E 269 17.86
ct
7.78
`
EL 15.
9 1. SEE SHEET C301. ROAD AND SIDE9ALK
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
l?``yy at t
2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
FOR SIT
T
MP
ACEMENT
EXIT OITC CENTERLINE E
L
TARGE
.
EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
t
N 3832992 79 ? CRE -DAY
, E 269097.
E
16
13 7 CON PO NT
3
7 J. SEE SHEET C-072. MISCELLANEOUS
FOR EXIT DITCH GRADING
TAI
S
.
L 2
2E905S ' .
DE
L
.
t , t 16(.?B 1. SEE SHEET C-016. EROSION AND SEDIIENT
( CONTROL. FOR STONE CHECK DAM DETAILS.
E% I1 OIT N CENTERLINE
N 38329T
E 269019 M
12
N 78 000

` ? It tt ` .
t l f _
? t t
37W 381 -ARCH
53JW x 781
h 71132962
.2 CSP-ARCH
3B7 T7
.
E 010.86
269 269 9?1
NV E
INV EL 16.1
t (
x
TTT
5
.???
?
`
933161 x 38 PtARCH \` t ttU? \ t}
l ?
'
N 7832952.
18
E 2
9
6 1 ^
.
6
0
INV Ftl 16? 3J
S88 yAW CS
-ARCH

l,\

Tt'?

PEANrEp PINE FREES l
T
ERVICE ROAD 9
t s(t 173 Ot
,
`
t
,
t
t, o

/ . tl 0 ' ` V It /

%'
' 0 :O 10 W.

/ 2
w
WZ•
,:800
1 2 3 4 5
t
7
C
i
8(
I
f
--------------- { - { st f INY6EL 16?19
C
LIL 16.19 E 269191.11 , N 38S 00
ATE
1 2 3 4 5 try PLAN
Fig
z
3 Q E
Y ? V
z
z
! ¢ Wj J
W a.
0
u
a J W
. N y
Q
Yj ? ¢ Z
u
= K
^ W C3
N Z
0] 6
a ¢ i
o. ? o
e a = ?
s
a ?? F
.zIF
146
?C
N
L-11
N 7877100
L-11 -1M C-11
C-11 C-11 C-11 -1] -12
-126
-138 C-17 C-13 G-13
-127
-13 -133 C-13
'
C-12

_ i
i
C-13 -17 C-12
STONE CHECK DAM
t. CONTR0. POINT
s N ]
37706
]0
_ _ _ _ _ - _ - -
_ _ _ _ _ - -
CENTERLINE
33i
M 7E 8
.
69191.13
t
t E Y16.27
EL
a

____ !
7
E Y69190.3
to•0 ----------
3
@ t
s
f
.._____. t
ELf 1fi.18 t t
CSP-ARCH
N]
386
3W770
W
`
`
t E%IT DI7CX LiNTERL INE
t , t { NOTES.
,,E 26969 1'b t{ t s f 1. SEE SHEET C-SOt. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
EC 16.16 SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.

i EXIT,DITCX CENTERLINE
N 7833]01.17 { E {
{ {
j 57W x 381W CSP-ARCH
3
' 2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
EMPLACEMENT DE7AIL5.
E 269191.29 1 N
3837291.91 1
7. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS
t ., ?

t
t \ { { t

P
{ s ?
1 t
ANT RINf EE'

- ? DETAILS. FOR EXIT DITCH GRADING.
1. SEE SHEET C-516• EROSION AND SEDIMENT

CONTROL. FOR STONE CHECK DAY DETAILS.
\\
t { SIT '
t If r >,

I
1 1T DIT CENTER6 HE ? N P32 Q
' S1 178 j ? J EL 16110

N 3837200

J' t i

IZa69, 0 20 so 60m
r.6ao
I 7 '? d t _CT
E
E

KEY PLAN N

-116 ¢
t
N 3873100
C-11 -1N C-11
C-11 L-11 C-71 -13 -12
-126
-778 C-73 C-17 C-13
-12
C-13 -137C-13
C-12
C-13 -13 C-12

. "' -- -- '--10.0 - ---- -- -'
- - - - - - - - - - -
-- '_ -_' --- _??.... - - xoTE57
1 _ 1. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
\ SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
\ TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT

\ EMPLACEMENT DETAILS. •PFdR-GiiRO.-?
\ ANTED PIH£ TREES
3
N 383
700
1
t

•
I476A"B?.T
?
!
1
( \ wT
?L Fr
l
1
I
Q
'
=
1
= Z

g

a w
IX w
Z
a
i
\ D? ? W -
a
-1 W
N Yj Z 2
U
t

1

?J
U
S N

O

O??-

\ }
?
J
2
W m
rn O
Q
e \ 303J 00 a
J ow
t `
,, 1
,• a ? Q z
1
t \ , ?
I
? a D, o

\, s
\ \ 1T lT 1 ? C
\ ,
\ A ? { t..
, -? /
1

0 20 ao BOm

11 b600 w.r ..
oea u... a

?C-147
D
C.
B
A
1 1 2 1 3 1
4 ' S
UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
MARINE CORPS BASE
PSC Box 20004
Camp Lejeune, North Carolina 28542-0004

M REPLY REFER TO
5090.11.2
BEMD
APR " 7 zoos
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality, 401 Section
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Raleigh, NC 27604
Dear Ms. Karoly:
We are providing additional information to you to be included with our
previously submitted application for a Department of the Army Permit
for the Multi-Purpose Machine Gun (MPMG) Range SR-8 (MILCON P-034)
within the Greater Sandy Run Area.
These enclosures are submitted to support your review, approval and
issuance of a Section 401 Water Quality Certification for construction
of the proposed project. They include cross section details of service
roads, maneuver trails, target emplacements, firing berms, firing
positions, and other details associated with the construction of this
range. The cut and fill details for the range include grid point
labels that define the depths of cut and fill throughout the range.
The point of contact for this project is Mr. Martin Korenek,
Environmental Conservation Branch, Environmental Management Division,
Installations and Environment Department, at telephone [phone].
Sincerel4A.B SCOTT WE R, PE
Director, Environmental Management
By direction of the Commanding Officer
Encl: (1) 7 copies of Cut and Fill Details for the Multi-Purpose
Machine Gun (MPMG) Range SR-8 (MILCON P-034) within the Greater Sandy
Run Area (19 Pages)
(2) 7 copies of Cross Section Details for the Multi-Purpose
Machine Gun (MPMG) Range SR-8 (MILCON P-034) within the Greater Sandy
Run Area (16 pages)
t,m5 7,71
APB? I ? 2006

CESAW-RG (1145-b)
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
PO BOX 1890
WILMINGTON NC 28402-1890
27 April 2006
MEMORANDUM FOR Commanding General, Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, Attn: Mr.
Scott Brewer, PSC 20004, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina 28542
SUBJECT: Action ID No. 200600815, Department of the Army permit request
1. Please reference your request for a Department of the Army authorization and a State Water
Quality Certification to impact 83.06 acres of jurisdictional wetlands associated with the
development of a new weapons training range in the Greater Sandy Run Area within Camp
Lejeune, Onslow County, North Carolina.
2. On 6 February 1990, the Department of the Army (DA) and the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) signed a memorandum of agreement (MOA) establishing procedures to
determine the type and level of mitigation necessary to comply with Clean Water Act Section
404(b)(1) Guidelines. This MOA provides for first, avoiding impacts to waters and wetlands
through the selection of the least damaging, practical alternative; second, taking appropriate and
practical steps to reduce impacts on waters and wetlands; and finally, compensation for
remaining unavoidable impacts to the extent appropriate and practical. To enable us to process
your application, in compliance with the MOA, we request that you provide the following
additional information:
a. Permits for work within wetlands or other special aquatic sites are available only if the
proposed work is the least environmentally damaging, practicable alternative. Please furnish
information regarding any other alternatives, including upland alternatives, to the work for which
you have applied and provide justification that your selected plan is the least damaging to water
or wetland areas.
b. It is necessary for you to have taken all appropriate and practicable steps to minimize wetland
or water losses. Please indicate all that you have done, especially regarding development and
modification of plans and proposed construction techniques, to minimize adverse impacts.
c. The MOA requires that appropriate and practicable mitigation will be required for all
unavoidable adverse impacts remaining after all appropriate and practicable minimization has
been employed. Please indicate your plan to mitigate for the projected, unavoidable loss of
waters or wetlands or provide information as to the absence of any such appropriate and
practicable measures.
MAY ..
oeNR - WATER r p
11
CESAW-RG (1145-b)
SUBJECT: Action ID No. 200600815, Department of the Army permit request
3. The aforementioned, requested information is essential to the expeditious processing of your
application and should be forwarded to us within two (2) weeks of your receipt of this letter.
Also, you should be aware that State and Federal commenting agencies may recommend design
modifications.
4. Mr. Brad Shaver of my Regulatory Division is responsible for processing your application. If
you have any questions or comments concerning this correspondence, please call Mr. Shaver at
[phone].
viJOHN E. PULLIAM, JR.
Colonel, EN
Commanding
CF:
Ms. Becky Fox
Wetlands Regulatory Section - Region 1V
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1349 Firefly Road
Whittier, North Carolina 28789
Mr. Steven H. Everhart
N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission
1721 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1721
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Division of Water Quality
N.C Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
2321 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 20601-2260
Mr. John Hammond
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
2

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
MARINE CORPS BASE
PSC Box 20004
Camp Lejeune, North Carolina 28542-0004

IN REPLY REFER TO:
5090.11.2
BEMD
MAR 17 2006
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality, 401 Section
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Raleigh, NC 27604
Dear Ms. Karoly: 2 0 Q 6 Q 4 5 0
Enclosed is our application for a Department of the Army Permit
for the Multi-Purpose Machine Gun (MPMG) Range SR-8 (MILCON P-
034) within the Greater Sandy Run Area. The enclosure is
submitted for your review, approval and issuance of a Section
401 Water Quality Certification for construction of the proposed
project. A check for $475.00 for processing this application is
also included with the request for Section 401 Certification.
An Environmental Assessment for the proposed project was
submitted to the State Clearing House under provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act. Comments were provided by
state agencies who reviewed the document to Camp Lejeune
December 21, 2005. A copy of the environmental assessment is
included for your review.
Camp Lejeune proposes to mechanically clear, cut, and fill 86.03
acres of non-riparian, freshwater wetlands to complete the
proposed project described in the permit application.
Camp Lejeune proposes to mitigate unavoidable wetland impacts
with wetland mitigation credits from the GSRA Wetland Mitigation
Bank.
MAR 2 0 2006
W"MOO? Ar?ro ?eMCH
s
404 The point of contact for this project is Mr. Martin Korenek,
Environmental Conservation Branch, Environment and Installations
Department, at telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
SCOTT A. B EWER, PE
Director, Environmental Management
By direction of
the Commanding Officer
Encl: 7 copies of the application for Department of the
Army Permit for the Multi-Purpose Machine Gun (MPMG) Range SR-8
(MILCON P-034) within the Greater Sandy Run Area
Final Environmental Assessment, P-034, Construction and
Operation of a Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range
cc: Mr. Stephen Rynas, NC DCM (without enclosures)
2'D080450
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT OMB'APPROVAL NO. 0710-0003
(33 CFR 325) Expires December 31, 2004
The Public burden for this collection of information is sestimated to average 10 hours per response, although the majority of applications should require
5 hours or less. This includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of
information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of Information
Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget,
Paperwork Reduction Project (0710.0003), Washington, DC 20503. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law,
no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control
number. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having
jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean .Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection , Research and
Sanctuaries Act, 33 USC 1413, Section 103. Principal Purpose: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application.for a
permit. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies.
Submission of requested information is voluntary, however, if Information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit
be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this
application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed
activity. An application that is not completed. in full will be returned.
1. APPLICATION NO.
2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED 14. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
5. APPLICANT'S NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (an agent is not required)
Mr. Scott Brewer Martin Korenek - Permit POC
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS
Marine Corps Base, PSC Box 20004 Marine Corps Base, PSC Box 20004
Camp Lejeune, NC 28542 Camp Lejeune, NC 28542
7.. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE 10. AGENT'S PHONE NOS. W /AREA CODE
a. Residence NA a. Residence NA
b. Business 910-451-5003 b. Business POC 910-451-7235
11. STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
I hereby authorize, NA to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of ,thisappl cption and to
furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE
NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE Iseeinstructionsi
Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range, Greater Sandy Run Area (MILCON No. P-034)
13. NAME OF WATERBODY. IF KNOWN rr.,e,rr,-u,. i 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS of pp?icea>el
Shelter Swamp Creek I
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Greater Sandy Run Area Training Complex
(located west of US Hwy. 17)
Onslow North Carolina
COUNTY STATE
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN, (seeinstnxtions)
MCB Camp Lejeune
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
Take US 17N from Wilmington to Holly Ridge. GSRA is bounded by US 17 on the east and south,
NC 50 on the west and south, and highways 1104 and 1107 on the north. Map of project areas
is provided.
ENG FORM 4345, Jul EDITION OF FEB 94 IS OBSOLETE. (Proponent: CECW-OR)
18. Nature of Activity (Description of pro)ea intrude an fwtwes)
Construction of a Machine Gun Range complex including a control tower, field service head,
operations storage building, general instruction building, ammunition breakdown building,
covered bleacher enclosure and covered meal area. The complex would also include a vehicle
holding area, Battle Site Zero area, a bivouac area, maneuver areas, training areas, target
emplacements, an emergency range shutdown system, telephone distribution system, secondary
rower distribution svstem. data distribution svstem. and a ranae warnina/sianal flaanole.
19. Project Purpose Qewww the reason or propose of the project, see imtrucirons)
Build a modern Multi-purpose Machine Gun Range Complex with required ancillary facilities
and utilities.
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
Cutting and filling is required to provide site locations for buildings, target locations,
access roads, utilities, and clear, maintained fields of fire for the range.
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Tvoe in Cubic Yards
Structural fill (clean and free of pollutants) and pavements, (stone/gravel/sand/concrete)
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (seeinstrtxaom)
86.03 acres of non-riparian wetlands. See details in attached narrative.
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes No " IF YES. DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (If more than can be entered here,
please attach a supplemental list).
This project is confined to locations within the boundaries of the Greater Sandy Run Area,
Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune.
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL" IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
`Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building and flood plain permits
26. Application is here y made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this
on ' c lete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the
duly au or" g of the applicant.
,?? I?fMI? ?? vU(?
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
NCDWQ 401 Sec 401 Cert
NCDCM Fed Consist.
NCDENR Erosion Ctrl.
NCDENR Stormwater
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
SR-8 Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range (MILCON P-034)
PROJECT NARRATIVE
March 2006
Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune
Greater Sandy Run Area
INTRODUCTION
The US Marine Corps (USMC) proposes to construct and operate a Multi-Purpose Machine Gun
(MPMG) Range SR-8 within the Greater Sandy Run Area (GSRA) of Marine Corps Base (MCB), Camp
Lejeune, North Carolina.
The Marine Corps's mission is to provide the most effective fighting force possible in a rapidly
changing world accented by asymmetrical warfare and the continuing global war on terrorism. In 2005,
Congress approved an additional 3,000 personnel for the Marine Corps in its 2005 Department of Defense
Authorization Act. Subsequently, the USMC decided that 2,100 out of the 3,000 authorized personnel
were going to be stationed at Camp Lejeuene. The Force Structure Review Group then developed
initiatives for the Marine Corps that include creation of additional infantry battalions and an increase in
the number of light-armored vehicle mounted infantry units. These changes have resulted in the approval
of five Military Construction Projects (MII.CON) proposed for implementation to accommodate the
training needs of this planned influx of personnel; increased operational tempo and standup of the Marine
Special Operations Command (MARSOC).
MCB Camp Lejeune needs to build and operate the MPMG SR-8 range to provide the necessary
facilities for Marine Corps as well as other military units to maintain their combat readiness. Existing
live-fire machine gun ranges at MCB Camp Lejeune are antiquated and inadequate for today's weapons.
They no longer adequately support all of the modern, medium and heavy machine-gun training
requirements for both the School of Infantry (SOI) where Marines receive entry level training, and the II
Marine Expeditionary Force (II MEF) combat units where annual sustainment and enhancement training
is required. The purpose of this project is to construct the first of 3 planned, modern ranges that provide:
• The most realistic and safe combat training-range for machine gun teams and snipers now using
modern, advanced weapons.
• A range that would support live-fire and maneuvering of both ground and vehicle mounted
machine guns including firing lanes that support vehicle "move and shoot" training.
• Static and moving electronic targets (reactive targets) that would provide realism as well as
performance feedback.
• Thermal image blankets on reactive targets to accommodate thermal sights on modern machine
guns and sniper rifles.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The 121 ha (300 acre) project site is located west of US Hwy 17 and lies in the portion of Marine
Corps Base Camp Lejeune referred to as the Greater Sandy Run Area (GSRA) in Onslow County, NC
(Figures 1 and 2). The Department of Defense purchased the 16,592 ha (41,000 ac) tract of land known
as the GSRA for MCB Camp Lejeune in 1992. State Road 50 bounds the GSRA on the southwest and
west, and Padgett, Haws Run, Dawson Cabin, and High Hill Roads bound the property to the north,
excluding some out parcels along the northern and western perimeter.
The GSRA is dominated by a series of southern pine forests of various age classes. Prior to
acquisition by the USMC, the GSRA was intensively managed for high volume commercial timber
production for about 45 years.
The GSRA also includes portions of a former World War R Army Training facility at Camp
Davis, located at the southern end near the Town of Holly Ridge.
SOILS
Soil types for the GSRA were determined using the Onslow County Soil Survey (USDA 1992).
Soils at the GSRA are comprised primarily of loamy fine sands and fine sands. Five soil types are
mapped in the project area. Two non-hydric soils occurring on project site include Foreston loamy fine
sand (FoA) and Stallings loamy fine sand (St). Urban lands on site were identified as existing, improved
roads. Three soils listed as hydric soils by the National Technical Committee on Hydric Soils (USDA,
Soil Conservation Service [SCSI 1991) occur on the site. These include: Leon fine sand (Le), Torhunta
fine sandy loam (To), and Woodington loamy fine sand (Wo) (Figure 3). These soils are influenced by
seasonally high water tables and typically have a high organic content and small particle size. Land
around the project site is managed forest land used for military training. A branch of Shelter Swamp
Creek, a tributary of the Cape Fear River Basin lies to the north of the project area.
NATURAL COMMUNITIES
The site is currently undeveloped and forested (Figure 4). It is located on a ridge that separates
the Great Sandy Run Pocosin into a northern pocosin and a southern pocosin. Natural communities of the
area were identified and classified into two broad categories; upland and wetland communities. The
upland communities found in the project area most closely resemble the Mesic Pine Flatwoods
community described by Schafale and Weakley (1990). Two variants occur: planted pine monocultures
and naturally regenerated, managed, mixed pine forests.
UPLANDS
Planted pine monocultures areas are characterized by a dominant loblolly pine (Pinus taeda)
canopy. Depending on the age of the individual stands and the frequency of occurrence of fire, these
woodlands may have anything from a sparse understory to a dense understory. Common understory
species include sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua), horse sugar (Symplocos tinctoria), blackberries
(Rubus spp.), common greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia), and bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum).
The mixed-pine woodlands community type is dominated by loblolly pine with individuals of
longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) and pond pine (Pinus serotina) scattered throughout. Common associates
in this type are sweetgum, red maple (Acer rubrum), and red bay (Persea borbonia). Shrub and herb
layers are sparse to moderate in density. Maintenance of this community type is aided by prescribed fire.
In those communities where fire is frequent, wire grass (Aristida stricta) dominates the herbaceous layer,
with bracken fern also very common in patches. Where fire is less frequent, various panic grasses
(Panicum spp.), broomsedges (Andropogon spp.), and paspalums (Paspalum spp.) dominate the
herbaceous layer.
2
WETLANDS
Two classes of non-riparian wetlands, palustrine forested and scrub-shrub wetlands, (based upon
the Cowardin classification system, Cowardin et al. 1979), can be found in the SR-8 project area.
Palustrine forests are further broken down into five subclasses, of which two were identified at
SR-8: broad-leaved deciduous forests (PFO1) and needle-leaved evergreen forests (PF04). Broad-leaved
deciduous wetlands are generally dominated by tree species such as red maple, black gum (Nyssa
sylvatica), and sweet gum. Mid-story of this subclass is comprised of red bay, sweet bay (Magnolia
virginiana), ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana), and American holly (Ilex opaca). The needle-leaved
evergreen canopy is dominated by pond pine and loblolly pine, with a mid-canopy similar to the broad-
leaved deciduous wetland. These subclasses both share similar shrub layers of highbush blueberry
(Vaccinium corymbosum), titi (Cyrila racemiflora), wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), inkberry (Ilex glabra),
fetterbush (Lyonia lucida) and sweet pepperbush (Clethra alnifolia).
Two of the five subclasses of scrub-shrub wetlands can be found within the SR-8 site: scrub-
shrub broad-leaved evergreen (SS3) and scrub-shrub needle-leaved evergreen (SS4). Broad-leaved
evergreen scrub-shrub wetlands have organic soils and dominant species include titi, fetterbush, inkberry,
and evergreen bayberry (Myrica heterophylla). Needle-leaved evergreen scrub-shrub wetlands are
generally composed of young or stunted pond pine or loblolly pine. Both of these scrub-shrub
communities at the proposed site contain young tree species, as well as a defined shrub stratum and
herbaceous layer. Several fern species populate this herb layer including netted chain fern (Woodwardia
areolata), royal fern (Osmunda regalis), cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamomea), sensitive fern (Onoclea
sensibilis) and bracken fern. The size and species composition of these areas is an estimate based upon a
review of aerial photography and field observations (Figure 5). They include:
• Palustrine forested broad-leaved deciduous (PF01)
• Palustrine forested needle-leaved evergreen (PF04)
• Palustrine forested needle-leaved evergreen / scrub-shrub broad-leaved evergreen (PF04/SS3)
• Palustrine forested needle-leaved evergreen / scrub-shrub broad-leaved evergreen saturated
(PF04/SS3B)
• Palustrine forested broad-leaved deciduous & needle-leaved evergreen / scrub-shrub broad-leaved
evergreen (PF01/4/SS3)
• Palustrine forested broad-leaved deciduous / scrub-shrub broad-leaved evergreen (PF01/SS3)
• Palustrine scrub-shrub (PSS)
• Palustrine scrub-shrub needle leaved evergreen (PSS4)
COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT
A federal Consistency Determination and this application will be forwarded to the North Carolina
Dept of Coastal Management requesting its concurrence.
ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT
The proposed project will not adversely impact essential fish habitat (EFH) or associated fisheries
managed by the South Atlantic or Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Councils or the National Marine
Fisheries Service.
FEDERALLY-LISTED THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES
Rough-leaved loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia) is the only known Federally threatened or
endangered species identified at the GSRA High probability habitat was surveyed for Rough-leaved
loosestrife (RLL) and no occurrences were found within the within the project limits. MCB Camp
3
Lejeune natural resources staff would continue to implement the measures described in the INRMP (MCB
Camp Lejeune 2001) to manage and preserve known populations of RLL. There would be no adverse
effects to the federally endangered RLL as a result of constructing and operating the MPMG Range at
SR-8.
Federally endangered red-cockaded woodpeckers (Picoides borealis) inhabit parts of MCB Camp
Lejeune, but no birds have been observed in the GSRA. Prior to government acquisition, timber harvests
removed mature pine stands necessary to support habitat for RCW nesting and foraging. (EDAW, Inc.
1998). Therefore, the proposed action has no potential to impact the endangered RCWs within MCB
Camp Lejeune.
The Carolina goldenrod (Solidago pulchra) is considered endangered by the state of NC, and
considered to be a species of concern at the Federal level. This plant is found within the power-line
easements around the GSRA, but there is no known occurrence within the project limits.
The American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) potentially may be found in the GSRA,
although this animal is listed as Federally threatened only because of its similarity of appearance to the
American crocodile (Crocodylus acutus), which is in fact threatened. Alligators may be encountered in or
near waterways of the GSRA but none of these areas are within the project limits. Therefore, there would
be no impacts to American alligators.
Construction, operation, and maintenance of the proposed MPMG range would have no adverse
impacts to any Federal or state listed species.
CULTURAL RESOURCES
Archeological investigations of all soils at the GSRA having a moderate or high probability of
containing archeological remains have been completed. As agreed to in a January 2000 meeting between
MCB Camp Lejeune personnel and the North Carolina SHPO, the survey of the Juniper Swamp
concludes the required archeological investigations at the GSRA. Therefore, no further cultural resource
surveys are necessary and no impacts to cultural resources are anticipated.
ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Several evaluation criteria were developed and considered when determining the placement of
this project. They are discussed in detail in the Final EA for Construction and Operation of a Multi-
purpose Machine Gun Range in the Greater Sandy Run Area at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune,
October 2005. They can be summarized as:
• Satisfy modern training mission requirements
• Minimize training conflicts between all GSRA ranges in order to maximize range utilization
• Avoid or minimize impacts to natural resources
• Manage noise impacts to acceptable levels by the surrounding community
The alternatives considered for this project included the no-action alternative, a location near the
Northwest boundary of GSRA, a location between the existing ranges SR-6 and SR-7, and the current
proposed location (Figure 6).
Alternatives Considered but Dismissed
Two locations, one near the Northwest boundary of GSRA, and the other the location between the
existing SR-6 and SR-7 ranges were considered, but eliminated from further study due to the perception
of potential noise affects on the adjacent community. During preparation of the Environmental
Assessment for this project, it was determined that placing SR-8 in its present, proposed location does not
4
create an off-base noise issue. Safe, simultaneous operation and maintenance of other existing ranges in
the GSRA (Figure 7) was another critical element that influenced site selection for this project (ranges
must be located to ensure bullet trajectories do not effect the operation of other ranges).
No-Action Alternative
The no-action alternative would limit Camp Lejeune's ability to train machine gunners on
modern weapons to current individual training standards resulting in marginal weapons proficiency, with
the unintended consequences of jeopardizing combat readiness.
Preferred Action
The GSRA Acquisition FEIS (LANTDIV 1991) and subsequent documents such as the GSRA
Master Development Plan Update (EDAW, Inc. 1998) examined wetlands in the GSRA and tried to
identify range placements that minimized impacts to wetlands during the acquisition of the GSRA. The
proposed action and preferred location for SR-8 MPMG Range, was selected after a review of the
evaluation criteria, as well as reviewing recommendations for range locations described in the GSRA
Master Development Plan Update and the Final Range Compatible Use Zone (RCUZ) Study for Marine
Corps Base, 2002.
During the preliminary investigations for this project, several sites were investigated for the
placement of the SR-8 MPMG Range to minimize impacts to wetlands. However, large live-fire ranges
inherently require large areas of cleared land. They also require large surface danger zones (those areas
that are impacted or have the potential to receive or lie in the path of fired projectiles) that mandate range
placement, including the utilities and other infrastructure needed to support the range. This ensures the
safety of not only military personnel training on the range, but all personnel training on adjacent ranges,
as well as those transiting through or near the base.
During the early planning and design stages of the range complex, the target locations, buildings,
facilities, and gravel roads within the 121 ha (300 ac) SR-8 site were placed to avoid and minimize
impacts to wetlands in a location south-southeast of the current location. However, the large surface
danger zone, prevented interoperability with other ranges and required designers to move the range to the
northwest.
Training and Range Requirements of SR-8
The SR-8 range must provide the safest environment possible to ensure all support and training
personnel on the range, (inexperienced as well as seasoned Marines) are not put at risk during prolonged
training exercises. The surface of the range must provide conditions for safe movement down-range by
personnel during live fire exercises both during night and day-time training, in variable weather
conditions, and when fatigued. The conditions of the range must also allow Range Safety Officers and
support staff responsible for safe operation of the range, clear, unobstructed views of the range and
targetry at all times, as well as access for emergency response personnel. The range must be maintained
according to prescribed maintenance schedules, to the same or nearly the same conditions throughout the
year to ensure all personnel train to the same standards.
The range must be designed so that the maximum effective range of modern weapon systems may
be realized. Many ranges on the installation simply can no longer support today's advanced weapon
systems. There is no, one single range at Camp Lejeune that can support light, medium, and heavy
machine gun training. Additionally, heavy machine gun training currently competes for training time on
other ranges such as the SR-7 Range, a Light Armor Vehicle (LAV) and Main Battle Tank (MIA1 tank)
range. Therefore, training is segmented to single weapons on individual ranges instead of using the whole
weapon system on one range. This is an inefficient way to conduct entry level and sustainment training
and it does not support dismounted, fire and maneuver from heavy machine guns. The surface of this
5
range must allow machine-gunners a clear, unobstructed view of targets at long distances during day and
night-time live-fire training. Targets must be visible with and without the aid of telescopic sights. Range
access roads must be trafficable by gun crews and tactical vehicles during day and night movements.
These access roads must be wide enough to permit inexperienced personnel some latitude to make
mistakes that will not result in catastrophic vehicle accidents.
Range Maintenance Requirements of SR-8
Maintenance problems experienced with existing ranges in the GSRA are directly related to
inundation of low and poorly drained areas within the range footprint. Vegetation management in periods
of extreme wetness is costly, creates additional wear and tear on maintenance equipment, and creates
delays in scheduled maintenance cycles which can then affect training quality due to time constraints and
unit long-range training schedules. Problems with severe inundation have also effected electronic
components of expensive automated target systems and forced the base to abandon portions of some
ranges. The design of the SR-8 range must promote reasonable and regularly scheduled maintenance that
includes, mowing, road repair, target repair and replacement, utility and target component upgrades, and
cleanup of spent ammunition components for recycling.
The SR-8 MPMG Range would consist of 10 firing lanes with a raised earth-berm firing position,
4 fighting holes, 2 vehicle-firing lanes, 2 defilade-firing positions, several vehicle pads for firing vehicle-
mounted guns, and a 10-meter Battle Sight Zero (BZO) range (see attached design plans). Vehicle fining
would occur from vehicles with mounted machine guns, moving down range 400 meters. Surface Danger
Zones (SDZ) would extend out in a fan-shape to a distance of 6,900 m (22,638 ft). The range would have
32 targets in each lane, out to a distance of 1,200 in (3,937 ft). The range would accommodate
marksmanship training with medium machine guns (M249 5.56 mm, M240G 7.62mm), heavy machine
guns (M2.50 caliber and MK 19 40 mm grenade) and sniper rifles (M40A3 and M82A3) during day and
night time training exercises. The range would be operational an average of 244 days per year and
roughly one-third of the operations would take place at night. Night operations would involve the use of
pyrotechnics. Helicopters would be authorized to conduct door gunnery exercises from altitudes below
152 in (500 ft) above ground level with training-practice ammunition and other inert (non-dud producing)
ammunition.
6
Wetland Impacts
Building and operating the SR-8 Range will cause unavoidable impacts to wetlands due to
mechanized land clearing, cutting, and filling required for the construction of roads, facilities, target
emplacements, buildings, and other infrastructure (Figure 6).
Construction of the MPMG Range would require impacting (clearing, cutting, and filling) 86.03
acres of non-riparian wetlands (Table 1). Previous impact estimates of 73.28 acres noted in the Final EA
for this project were recalculated. The current proposed area of impact totaling 86.03 acres includes
wetland areas located inside the project limits that were just outside of the jurisdictional delineation
boundary. The areas of compacted fill serving as the foundations for targets, roads, buildings and firing
positions totals 9.64 acres (Table 2). 76.39 acres will remain as vegetated areas to be mowed and
maintained within the range footprint. See designs attached.
' ?127400 61293 4649 1371334 2164542 164178 31.48
' 100101 46320 1830 1077487 1635775 64626 24.74
' 580 92 0 6243 3249 0 0.14
' ?54121 18995 988 582558 670802 34891 13.37
' 65930 20239 322 709671 714734 11371 16.29
• 86.03
Table 1. Summary of proposed wetland impacts/general fill at SR-8. Information provided by U.S. Armv
Engineering and Support Center, Huntsville, Alabama.

• •- .-
OVJWIA?
M [awl
..
' ?20305 12086 218566 426813 15808 5.02
' • 8703 1715 93681 60565 2243 2.15
' 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
' ?3178 990 34206 34962 1295 0.79
' 6831 1189 73531 41989 1555 1.69
• 9.64
Table 2. Summarv of nronosed compacted fill areas at SR-8. Information nrovide d by U.S. Armv Engineerine and
Support Center, Huntsville, Alabama.
7
Mitigation
The Greater Sandy Run Wetland Mitigation Bank in the GSRA on Camp Lejeune was developed
specifically for range development and infrastructure projects in the GSRA (Figure 8). Compensatory
mitigation for this proposed project will be provided with credits from the GSRA Wetland Mitigation
Bank. A summary of the credits available in the GSRA Wetland Mitigation Bank is provided in Table 3.
Credit Type Total Mitigation Approved Approved Approved Mitigation Unused
Credits Mitigation Mitigation Mitigation Credits Mitigation
Established In Credits As Credits Credits Pending Credits,
Bank Of 17janO6 Used Available Success
Criteria Total In
Bank*
Pocosin Area, 886.8 490.5 355.93 134.57 396.3 530.87*
Pocosin/Pine
Flatwoods
Big Shakey, 143.4 143.4 127.56 15.84 0 15.84*
Bottomland
Hardwoods
Burned Pine 135.5 0 0 0 135.5 135.5*
Plantation,
Pocosin/Pine
Flatwoods
Burned Pine 84.8 51.5 0 51.5 33.3 84.8*
Plantation,
Bottomland
Hardwoods
Total 1250.5 685.4 483.49 201.91 565.1 767.01
Table 3. Summary of Greater Sandy Run Mitigation Bank *These totals pending approval of performance criteria in
all portions of the bank.
8
The GSRA Wetland Mitigation Bank provides 1250.5 acres of restored and enhanced pocosin,
pine flatwoods, and bottomland hardwoods in the form of mitigation credits for Camp Lejeune.
Pocosin/pine flatwoods credits are debited at a ratio of 1.5:1 acres mitigated to acres lost.
Bottomland hardwoods are debited at a ratio of 3:1 acres mitigated to acres lost. A summary of
previously permitted projects in the GSRA and impacts is provided in Table 4.

Number ACTION ID Pine Flat Hardwood Credits Pine Flat Hardwood Project
Credits Credits Used Used Impacts Impacts Impacts
Used
P-949 199400693 25.88 0.00 25.88 17.25 0.00 17.25
P-933 199505124 100.47 22.47 122.94 66.98 7.49 74.47
P-028 199701178 14.27 0.00 14.27 9.51 0.00 9.51
P-934 199707554 18.62 14.69 33.31 12.41 4.90 17.31
P-062 199901380 18.45 11.49 29.94 12.30 3.83 16.13
P-935 200001559 37.24 20.91 58.15 24.83 6.97 31.80
HWY 17 NCDOT 141.00 58.00 199 94.00 19.30 113.3
SR-7 200400940 0.627 0.0 0.627 0.418 0.0 0.418
Targets
(Proposed)
Totals 356.56 127.56 484.12 237.72 42.6 280.19
Table 4. List of previously permitted GSRA range projects
Camp Lejeune proposes to provide compensatory mitigation for this project by debiting 129.05
pocosin/pine flat (non-riparian) credits from the bank for 86.03 acres of impacts to non-riparian wetlands
at a ratio of 1.5 credits for every acre impacted.
References/Enclosures
Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Atlantic Division (LANTDIV). 2006. Final Environmental
Assessment, P-034, Construction and Operation of a Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Ranee, U.S. Marine
Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina.
Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Atlantic Division (LANTDIV). 2002. Draft Range Compatible
Use Zone (RCUZ) Study for Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina.
9
42, +
a do
NX
r I 1l
It SC 1110 kC
Mat r ! ?; t js c l dui '• h C A F ?e C =C a F
?I . 1' 63 61 ; 6E I 66 I •I-61 • 1 " 601a Ti 1 !7 M A 1 J
4,1
T A' , r 1F R 1 c c R^ `.
.. r
r SM t : SJ. I ' s
a? 1 rT _ LF v a.
E ?1 L
31
'bar a 1•r t ? .; .. OAf
22
T~ M I L T A N Yq R E S E$ Y S 1 1r0 \ - --- -
. ? - 1 - - .I.1 • V- far - ? •- - ? lC. cm
Y„ 61 •. - 63 61 is 66 7 -,EE Air,
/ SO yy +'-,? 1
w 1 ( !
-77
Sti FY - . . ''M-J ` 1 I
24
4-1
? C s v dip _ ? ' y _ f i •N
A
Site Boundary 0 12,000 24,000
Feet
Map Source: Camp Lejeune Military Installation Map 1 inch equals 8,333 feet
SR-6 MPMG
GSRA Prepared: March 2, 2006
MCB Camp Lejeune Author: Land and Wildlife Resources Section Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Onslow County, NC Organization: Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune
Individual Permit Application Environmental Conservation Branch
aa-
i ?
? I

SLdr
Id
40

X
?rt , al?- - y ly_ -
!h -?` _ ay

--

f
.jc

\
Mw.
_?.' _?

?
: ?? -
.yam

- ••+?
?- -?. !L?- ? ?
`?
Qlr

?I
-+tt f -
?- -
-r -
r
•
?? L 1 f4 ... ?'\ -yam •?•- fW? ._. I ?. 'J.. -J? - ? - -
N
A
Site Boundary 0 1,500 3,000
Feet
Map Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle, Folkstone 1 inch equals 1,500 feet
SR-8 MPMG
GSRA Prepared: March 2, 2006
MCB Camp LeJeune Author: Land and Wildlife Resources Section
Onslow County, NC Organization: Marine Corps Base, Camp LeJeune Figure 2. Topographic Map
Individual Permit Application Environmental Conservation Branch
TO/
1
1 FoA 1
1 :¦

st
FO
WO
Ln
7i
2
TO
N
A
Site Boundary 0 800 1,600
Feet
Map Source: Soil Survey of Onslow County, North Carolina 1992 1 inch equals 800 feet
SR-8 MPMG
GSRA Prepared: March 2, 2006
MCB Camp LeJeune Author: Land and Wildlife Resources Section
Onslow County, NC Organization: Marine Corps Base, Camp LeJeune Figure 3. Soils Map
Individual Penult Application Environmental Conservation Branch
= Site Boundary
SR-8 MPMG
GSRA
MCB Camp LeJeune
Onslow County, NC
Individual Permit Application
Prepared: March 2, 2006
Author: Land and Wildlife Resources Section
Organization: Marine Corps Base, Camp LeJeune
Environmental Conservation Branch
N
A
0 800 1,600
"I MM9 Feet
1 inch equals 800 feet
Figure 4.
Aerial photograph of site.
•Y .-• • - r" Cr rr t
?` *1. r}?? Cp'!nM y Ct# r.. y ?,-. i+t?.?, t., f J? ?+c '.: °a^!'° t•y Y.C
+ 41 4 + 9 ,° r f p a a+ } x,4 it i b .?f , t %' j fi
ti,tii++} f r?i+l7 7 ?r ;? ?[:,? _? ? , .; c*y ?, ?;+r t ,•I'?4,i "?L jt r yf.fp?. ? "+11,1 ,F???.,, t ... , '
v. V;
,` ?K."•. ,.a .r.tt '\ t : ? d v +r 'i:... t. t i F t'f+" F" t. i e
j - y v? 1,' .t >• t?},.. t1 nIR,. ,( +? ` ' ? ,f? t •J 'I,'r' r ?' t t ?a ?+r_
?'Y is „77a •'tt • .. tx.w t;'`\?:, "?. t "?-? riF/`'' .? a ?'l,•_'1• , yY, „`i s}- f 'X.
? '1 ?1•?" t rt ''? ?3t tr1" , ,t t l` '.. `? t 'Irt, •. ?? C! r , ?prb •• ? SZ ? , h
?+? a'f ? +i`•'?:Y?,r ?' ??.." (?*r'? ? ij! 1 ? p r?, .?..tY + v.?,t' :,:a i !rr ?,. ??' ? S4 t?3r 's""
i s r, `? Y r a° t r q 4?F F i.
• t t a?Yt .Y G yaj''y, r'.bt? 7 ?`' y y?F?* a
t'.•t a fyJ G + r,, `?.r ,?1?1, ry.'i a.F.•, _r",+? .
"\•Nry:'Y ?•? i, t,'6 ? ''"f?'? ?T?AI? ?.y •' t.. 'ilr? •'¢?'
,y?r r?rf l.+?r`?,e '/'SR?Y,_ t?,R , r ? -?,/'`a k" r .• •_? .•• ?KIKr}f.
i ? ff ?? f
At,?? 1if =,? YK ,Q, Y.+"' ?? , r?... .?".4?„ :' l? •r .w?.trf•- ^1? F .. S1lt tu'i:ti: is ,..:
axe' ?° ' ..+
14-
T J=}`'?,}4X
,''4:_ 7,^ S ?T ate x* < ? -i +?.[•'J' r ."' -.. it``
~?t; , Ji Str :+? r 'yy r L a \ t,s r a-j .
r r
to -- _ [J• ' R•j /ry M t I ,,?? {a ? \
?, ??? ti's ?-•?-+' aT, •,+? S ? ?+ r? ? ?'.. ? rx
ylPy'.. ++ "ty"r-1' ? rZ? ? a+?1I i. t;..
aar„ ?Fy, -. r?'i.. •' '?, .rye x ,_
,a n•r 1"? 1 •r+ -1' j•µ ? ?' YI., yI •. } !.; aFY x•Y., r`? ti `, V..?`r ? •r ?,+
i . !? ,i r1 1? t i J b r f
.: p7, r t Y ' ? IrF"t t*? ? 1 :'7'?ti a•• d 'a r r'?ii ? ? ? °' J
Site Boundary PF04 PSS nN
NWI CLASPFO1
pF041solated SS4 I\
PF04/SS3 Upland 0 800 1,600
PF01/4/SS3
PF04/SS3B Nondelineated Wetlands TTT!T Feet
PFO1/SS3 1 inch equals 800 feet
SR-6 MPMG
GSRA Prepared: March 2, 2006
MCB Camp Lejeune Author: Land and Wildlife Resources Section Figure 5.
Onslow County, NC Organization: Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune Aerial photograph of site
Individual Permit Application Environmental Conservation Branch with jurisictional wetlands.

•

•

or

1
s
1

N
SR-8 MPMG LAYOUT A
Juiistictional Wetlands 0 800 1,600
Feet
1 inch equals 800 feet
SR-8 MPMG
GSRA Prepared: March 2, 2006
MCB Camp Lejeune Author: Land and Wildlife Resources Section
Onslow County, NC Organization: Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune Figure 6. Project Layout.
Individual Permit Application Environmental Conservation Branch
7
6 :q
i
ns
All
N
Camp Lejeune Boundary Proposed Live Fire Ranges n
Site Boundary Existing Live Fire Ranges 0 7,000 14,000
Generalized Location of MAC Feet
1 inch equals 6,600 feet
SR-8 MPMG
GSRA Prepared: March 2, 2006
MCB Camp Lejeune Author: Land and Wildlife Resources Section Figure 7.
Onslow County, NC Organization: Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune GSRA Live Fire Ranges and Maneuver Areas
Individual Permit Application Environmental Conservation Branch
it M
,y

i
V .`
Ail.

s
1k
r r"?
N
A
GSRA Wetland Mitigation Bank 0 4,200 8,400
RM ;;;j 00001 Feet
1 inch equals 4,200 feet
SR-8 MPMG
GSRA Prepared: March 2, 2006
MCB Camp Lejeune Author: Land and Wildlife Resources Section Figure 8. GSRA Wetland Mitigation Bank
Onslow County, NC Organization: Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune
Individual Permit Application Environmental Conservation Branch
C

E
F
1 2 3 4 5
E
LE O E
EXISTING NEW GENERAL NOTES.
1. BLOCKS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET REPRESENT THE SHEET MATRIX.
BOLLARD a 2. ALL CONTOUR INTERVALS SHOWN AT 0.25M.
CABLE PEDESTAL
3. SURVEY DATA OBTAINED BY U.S. ARMY ENGINEERING AND SUPPORT
•m REV IATIONS USED
CONCRETE MONUMENT
L?
CENTER. HUNTSVILLE.
BZO CANTLE SIGHT ZERO
?
4• HORIZONTAL SURVEY DATA OUTPUT IN UTM. NAOBS. ZONE 18. METERS.
FIRE HYDRANT S. VERTICAL SURVEY DATA OUTPUT IN NAVO88. METERS.
C SP CSP CORRUGATED STEEL PIPE GUT ¦IRE _j 6. SEE SHEET C-198 FOR CLEARING LIMITS.
E EASTING POWERPOLE ?S
T. ALL ELEVATIONS AND COORDINATES ARE IN METERS UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN.
EL ELEVATION
?
ESS OTHERWISE SHOWN
AR
T
BE GRADED TO 3
1
N

FFE
FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION SANITARY SEINER MM1810LE .
8. ALL SLOPES
O
1
U
L
E
AND C-131
C-128
DEMOLITION DEFINED ON SHEETS C-125
9
M METER SIGN cr .
.
.
.
MM MILL METER SOIL BORING
MIT MOVING INFANTRY TARGET EMPLACEMENT WATER METER i SURVEY CONTROL POINTS
N NORTHING PT. NORTHING (Y) EASTING IX) ELEVATION (Z)
N.T.S. M07 TO SCALE BUILDING CORNER CLJl00 3832992.231 271952.566 22.192 BW
CONCRETE PAD a
PC POWER CENTER EMPLACEMENT CLJ200 3832899.062 271822.959 21.769
R RADIUS GRAVEL ROAD J116 3633071.326 272186.111 21.209
SIT STATIONARY INFANTRY TARGET EMPLACEMENT FENCE -+->->-`-
$1A STATION MAJOR CONTOUR '" "lH•O "" "' -HIA-
TTP. TYPICAL `
MINOR CONTOUR NOTESs
TREELINE I. ALL HATCHED AREAS ARE WETLAND AREAS.

% ? 2. CLJ 100 AND CLJ200 ARE 3', DOMED BRASS SURVEY MARKERS SET IN
C-197 C-196 WETLAND AREAS f
f/

WITH POINT
YEAR 2005
CONCRETE AND STAMPED CORPS ON ENGINEERS

?
ROAD CENTERLINE - - - - .
. ON

45 DESIGNATION.
SIT 3. J116 IS A NORTH CAROLINA GEODETIC SURVEY CONTROL MONUMENT.
.i'BWNWF6oFi
ii[-
MI T
C-195
4 C-143 FF{G}N?1
l 16
a w
C-19 PC v ,
i
AGLJ 100 ??
r, ACLJ200
_•
C-192 ><... t
C-139 a

kC-141 T
B
U
C-190 a Y 1U z a
W
B • Ir W
F C-135 O j

Y> u
`
C-138 , 0137 C-136
v,

? ?L-'32
?
to a
i
•
N
? w
Nn m ?
R'

V N
1-139 C-t}3 ? u

i K
w
too lao 0 200 900 ? i m '
c-l3l
1 2 3 4
I
I 7 q d i
E
E

~

STONE CHECK-`04M
?
CONTROL POINT
N 38320
\ ?? ? C-19 -196
- 1
1 269
9!0?- 11
EL TT.00
"

ll°?
s /

-11 -799 -79

/N EXIT DITCH CENTERLINE

l -12

C .4c 9 C 9
-126
E t N 7672078.96
E 269909.13 R.. ARi'A
CE CER411H1 17.
-138 C-7] -13 -17
EL 16.32 N 38 000 -12
t IC-134C-133 -13
PLANTED PIN TREES

1

1
-13 C-12 '
t 1 ? '
\ f
O
F
w s t\ 4
I i
3 S ?
i
E E s NOTES,
1. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
t SECTIONS. FOR CC ROAD UPGRADE AND
CLEARING LIMIT. ^
,
f

` 2. SEE SHEET C-513. MISCELLANEOUS
-
'? ` DETAILS. FOR EXTENDING EXISTING
CULVERT. >lRI.W-R11Rii
,
t \ \ 3. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS
t ` DETAILS. FOR GRADING AT BIVOUAC
is

SECURITY BAR

IE _

A.
AREA.
9. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS. 81F
N 3871900 S. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS i
,.\
i DETAILS. FOR EXIT DITCH GRADING. i
S. SEE SHEET Ci16. EROSION AND SEDIMENT
yl + 1 CONTROL. FOR STONE CHECK DAY DETAILS.
\ i //
t T. SEE SHEET C-108. SITE LAYOUT PLAN.
FOR BIVOUAC CENTERLINE ELEVATION.

•. 610W --?
-- Z a
-?
N 3e 87.99 ?? a o v ?

IHI EL296.21
f - w
_ N w L a
a ?

't 610MM
N 3831C asp
86.07

(0 = U
r
i E 269950.86
INV E
16
29 !
o
= w
-` L
.
\1 EXISTING 610W
TO BE DEYO
I SP
m
L 610MM CSP to
J" N 3831862.99 4 U, G
INV6EL 16,63 a G

610181 CSP
38318
9
8 a o

Z c7
6
E 269959 N j
l INV EL 76.65 8 8 ¢
PLANTED P!. . TREES PLAt3TEO PINE TR[E5 N 3831000 1 z 12
G

?
8 8 1 /'
8
1
0 20 90 bat

?
.A.
C-131
D
C
B
A
1 1 z 4 Z)
I '] V d r\

{

- I N 3832300

? 5M3318M]z 8.11 6 CSP-ARCH
32

E 269901.91
7.19

?

? ??

Fk.ANIED PINE, iREF,S yt

-14 C-14 C-14 -13

-126

12
\ t ?? 4 t -178 1-13 -13 C-13
V

t 533W z 381W CSP-ARCH
1
t N 872265.
3
It it ENY6Ei9fi9ig - \\

_
+ _
iT \\?t M370Md381_?8M CSP-ARC11't
7PO E 269922920.2t0x? t

Y

t
A

S
+

t t

-17 -137
t-/2
C-13 -17 C-12
1, t

Nil t ?
1
SI EL 17.08 t
\ INY
1 ,
1
i //
/ l
f , I
1 /
f 1
t
t

E
•

??
,1,
, S T 1 t
t
t ti t

t .i *»
t ' S731Y
/0WCSP-ARCM
3223 z}7871
N ]8

1
?

t

t
t
t1i t .
.l•
269927
50 i Y:`
4 S t
, i
of

li f6
ttt t/? T 1 i t
781 CSP
t(l T M3 ` t y, '
H , t t
t ' NOTES,

SITE LAYOUT PLAN
T C-109
/
219
948 t t .
1. SEE SHEE
.
FOR LEOVAC CENTERLINE ELEVATION
f

38
'
3
'
NV .03
? . _
-ARCN
C
, -- ]8]21 O1
/
E 269 8 3m
383

? 269
E
?' ?
,x 7H1W C
77
/207 /
].

t
` 2. SEE SHEET C-' 09. SITE LAYOUT PLAN.

FOR BUILDING FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS.
15
INV EL 97.00 IT
INV , 1
177.0 f t ?

1

3• SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK ?

: N 3832 SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS. ?-
IT 4 t t
i
\ `
`? _ t I
" i
t t /. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
73 t

t 1
/i
r x 78 C'S- xi J
5]]41
N?383217 TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
EMPLACEMENT DETAILS. gIFe07ie?N-
f
T
St ? _/ /- h 26995 .23
"I NV E 11.01
i
+"
5. SEE SHEET C-503. STATIONARY IMF TRY
?-
,
\ 1 1RCx
S7 -z BiW;C
3 /.94
TARGET EYPLACEYENT. FOR DOUBLE SIT
a?-

t I t lYY
CSP- S 2699 .68 `
'9 YEDVA
{AN I
AREA EMPLACEMENT DETAILS. i-
N 387 5A. 66
2 6f.33
1 S.-
57 30 CSP-MCH CENTERLINE L
7.66
t t y? G. SEE SHEET C-506. FIRING BERM. FOR

GRADING AT FIRING BERM.
t 1 EL 16.

I I
';I f(

i
832161 1 /
26998 7//
7
, t
t
7. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS

°
SIT 3 '
37W z BIYM. 7
INY EL 6,9
i,
' DETAILS. GRADING AT LEDVAC

N 3B3 5.71
,
f
,
/

t
?
LANDING AREA REA. .
_

.p.. ..
t E Z6 11.71
IN L 16. ARCNv /

j*
A' J
]
W
8
SP

t
t

B. SEE SHEET 0-512. MISCELLANEOUS

B z

z
+I
T 2 \
, '
t Ql
153
N
7
6 S
E 99153. ?
EL 4 i ?

t \\ DETAILS. FOR GRADING AT BUILDING
EXTERIOR. 4
_ W
Z
51 ?? ? 9. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS
DETAILS. FOR EXIT DITCH GRADING.
8
z -1
a
EXIT OIT AfE
i

t
10. SEE SHEET C MISCELLANEOUS OETAIIS.
10. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.
6 o
-
LOj -1
W
,NN
'74688/6. ! p O
i
?
78
-'
/.
f
?3N ]8 70.90
/C
2
t, t
FOR TARGET SERVICE ROAD 711R11AROND.
UI

9

a

a
z
9/ ?t i
.
6
EL
;A
~ ' /
1
P- i
/
6.95
/ 11. SEE SHEET C-514. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS. o
t 1
r s x 2
CS
ft
f
Y
1
7
C x
MEOVAC LANDING AREA FORA?LS ZO.BERM LOCATION AND GRADING
DE7 2
X W
o
to , 1
` 6 ]7.
E / -N
1
832
5
3
?"p?
J C?- ? X27 18 / CENTERLINE EL 17.68 = UI O
W
3811 CSV-r
t
3 9 B1 W ARC .8t tqv EL 6.93
E,^
j6
8
/ l , w m
N z
a
z
5
7 411v
9 t
j NJ872100 J N
INY6Ellt6392 Pt S
r
J a
Bz0 F
tt _
LINE iRING ,? a

IA
573W 1t f
/ \

r
yf
`?
t `i \ r
f F /

J /
i
`

t
2

?
a O
w

O
91 ?
-'I / i
533M IW CSP-ARCH E N e 6 J E
jr
I d'
' S37W 3B1W -AR E 990 1 I
tu t
53 781 •
14
38322 9W C -MCH? '
\ + E 2i2983
6q 1 EL 16 1 1
N 3832070.21 '
E 269891
79 \ 1
.26 6 CSC}; f
kY
' S .
i .' o.,, ,. >IIPI: EL 16180:
"-
.
INV EL 16.88 \
+7 ? I
L
IT OIT CENTE INE '/
+ 533W ?[ 381W SP-

.
x 1W C -ARCH /
7W
7
2
93 -
f
S37W x 381
Wt5
N 7852061.70 0 \ 7•
812 / n
2
E 369
.
M 383
0
6.
E ]28672 SSSgT / E 269967.5 a
"
IMV EL 16 9
:Z t

0 20 40 BOm
E 269896:55 ., \ i J .
89 f /
EL 1 INV 16.! !
INV EL 16.88 .
?
?2A8
C-132
D
C
B
A
1 z .i 14 v

E
E

SI7 I1 `\ _,
t ?ti? ? _ ' IL
C " .. ^ ..ta,J ` li 2T
? ? ` aEY.lLYI

?+ 1 t SIT 33 17 92700
i i
^ ^ ., / l 1 $1Lt
l C-11 C-11 -13
C-11 -12
I !
"533Y z 361M CSP-
'" "" t 533W K
RCH N 383229
7
E
696 87W CSP-ARCH "..
H
I7 A 1 A -126

-ue c-u c-73 c-13

N 3832279.67
E 269650.18
'
\
2
1
f' ` •INV EL 1
.33.
?

t
f
-12 i
INV ELF 7.32
..

i
N3 .
SIT
21.
W z 381W CSPYARCH
832230.22 ..
?
'? t

1 ! l

t -13 -13

C-12

C-17 -77 C-12

Q
'-" ExiT OT TCII C
N 383Y258. 81
E 269637.43
INV EL 17
29 E
NTERLINE
\ j SIT 32 I /
69722.U
EL 12.21 SIT- r t
1
t

t a

1
.
t (
1 "
?a

., ` sIr at - ? 1 f ?}
i
"-' 1
/ -
>-
•/'? / ,? yam. / 533181 301W CSP-ARCM
E 39322S.6
f INEL SIT 23
ft
533W 38TU1 C t
-ARCH !
NOTES,

T UiCEN
I ` [HE

4 SIT 22 N 3632193.01
E 269827.15
INV EL 17.OBft f
t
1. SEE SHEET 0-501. ROAD AND SIDEVALK
CTIOSS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.

9E _

`
Ai 3832205 19?
E 269605..'10
EL $'fONE CNECR DAY 1
PC
Cd1Tfl3OL POINT
6
3 t t t 2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET EIPLACENENT. FOR 517
?
69613
E 2
EL 17
09
- EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
m

/ .

t Z

.. 2
7. SEE SHEET C-503. STATIONARY
R DOUBLE DOIRINFANTRY
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR LE SIT

ri

/

N%7b32i9 CN79EN7ERLi
1 (
""-
t - i
57] x'381 CSP =

'
EMPLACEMENT LENi DETAILS.
1. SEE SHEET 0-512• MISCELLANEOUS
/

". E 269710
.11 69827 9i \fi y %I DETAILS. FOR EXIT DITCH GRADING.
S.
SEE SHEET C-505. POVERCENTER

_ ` ._ ...'
?.
EXIT OtitH LbIffERLi
- \
N 3832190.17
E 269770.12

W_

D
N IT 63....5577 $NTERL I
f
7 PLACEMENT. FOR P011ERCEWER
EM
EIPLACEIENT DETAILS.

MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS
SEE SHEET 0-512
6 j-?-
--"??-

-

IT. 17.10 , J 269
EL 17.
STONE CK OA
CONT POINr •i

/ .
.
.
FOR TARGET SERVICE ROAD TURNAROUND
LAYOUT.

„ -
N 3 215.2 t
E 697991 ? 1
77.75 EXIT DIT 1 CENT INE

;;..
!N 3832 7 82
?
f
?
SIT/t, t'
f
, t
-
T. SEE SHEET C-516. EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL. FOR STONE CHECK DAM DETAINS.

u
Y Z
V '
\ ..
.. ' E 269 T.
8
EL .B1 t
AROEX
3 z

f j?
- +
1 f t EXIT DITCH CE
! N 3832132.60 ERL INE

1

; y
h

f E 269820.21
EL 16.87
STONE CHE

DAY w G. a
Y,,, x IS

x It
u

CONTROL F

E 269
823.
OINT
.75

7 o

S y
z
Z w m
EL 17.10 N 38721 p a

u
Z o
a
u
"
Pl.ANT
. ZW. Eli
... =
i / f 5
r o zo so W.
r.6oo

C-133
D
C
B
A
1 2 1 .3 1 4 a
I 9 ] A P;
E
E

533W X 381
N 3832520.7
E 269247 7.,95
INV
E
II CSP-AR H TARGET SERNIDftt
/
N
AZ7
SERVI RpADW' mo
y 4 -1,
C-1
R
E Sli 4
94.
38173
If
_

"PC; RKS.0011
STOIE?CNECR 0.(Y
CW POINT
i- N 3832301NSTENioip.7liEy
E 269402
1
1"'
11 ` 1.4TC-IA
-1 4F-
_
41 7832278.01
2-6
r
x
•2J .1.
-
11
tfis EL L7.,S y i+
0A
STONE C-14 C-14 C-t, -13
_ -12
ES
t
B". O
B
r
8
q? r ?3832264
y11
L

138 C-13 C-17 -13
-
-

- '

r T
E
EL2455p?f f RU
67
?
-12
-- - '- - TARGET SERVICE ROAD T -

rl -
'tc \ tffi
P ..
S
137 1J

12
C

33W K 3B ._._._. - - -
_ _ _ _ _ _

W CSP-ARCH ?

r

J t
N%117CN CENTEI4. 1NE fst?
Gits
260.29
.22
c ?S
S¢ F)L i7. S7
t (
1
C-13 -13 C-12

ii

N 3832302.
E 269244
5
2 EXIT OI7CN CENTERLINE
N 3632302.11
i
fl
yaq y y t- `
7

_
AS

- ?E

?
.
INV EL 17. 3 E 269244.01
EL 17.57
._6X GI 0I7LM CEpTERL INE
- -
3
3
25
5
6
?y+tlt' IIILLL '_
-
t
1 2
E
8
2
05 iyy 1
l
EL 17.44

1 NOTES,
t. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEVALK
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.

I/ 2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.

R,INp-'ili6?
N 3832201

1
! 3• SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS
DETAILS. FOR EXIT DITCH GRADING. F?
/
.. 4. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.
ORaTRGET SERVICE ROAD TURNAROUND 1?'66gF!>3iaT

\

?? J?`?- _ / ? . ...

if" j \ ,?{ ! L
S. SEE SHEET C-516. EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONROL. FOR STONE CHECK DAN DETAILS. gar_

=?-

a
!
h! 2 Z i
Z

C? 7 J
O

W
aa
~?'G3 9 > Z Q Z
O = U Q
u 41 w
=
C,
PLANT J fF2.= tRe£S Z
G N m Z
a
N 303210 1
J
O y
5
Q ? L
2
o. ? a
N n s = s
z
8 8 8 8
0 20 4o bon,
1:600

C-134
1)
C
B
A

C
B
A
1 1 L S -+ LI
1 z 4 1 5
E
E

•
•
;
? ????
i
f
® ? - 3W x 381M CSP-AkCNH
N 3832594.99
\
SIT 59 E 269754.16
INV EL 17.59
\
\e
b
r
T
9
/ tr .-. t
K-TEO INE TREES C-14 -144 -14
\f 5381
3
` 1W LSPY t \ + C-14 C-14 C-14 -13 -12
-126
?
517 5T- N '3872580
E, 269749. 99,
2t t
, \ t
l \ -138 C-13 C-13
SfT -, a 'INV EL 1 7
?56 b 00
,
?• -12
? t -13 -133 -1J

_ -- \
' S
s ,
+ -
D C-12
C-13 -13 C-12
SIT 55 Z0.0 .-

lo I7
!
' 1 lls

N NOTESS
1. SEE SHEET 0-501. ROAD AND SIDEMALB
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET EMPLA.
EMPLACEMENT DDEEWNLS.FOR SIT
--
/ -
1
p
• t •" '
533W X 3%MM CSP-,ARCH
N 3832447
27 _ _
_.,f"'"?
-- '" - " ^ 3. SEE SHEET 0-503. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET ENPLACENENT. FOR DOUBLE SIT Ri
,p
1 .
E 269803.09ye'JY
-- -- y--rte'"' EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.

- •• INV 17.56
- --
._- '- .- -i-v""'
3
4. SEE SHEET C12. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.

4
` FOR TARGET SERVICE ROAD TURNAROUND
LAYOUT. iT
381W CSR-ARCM
533W
N 7872x41.92
H• E 269794.60
=•
.- '- -"
=?
-'^'
S.
VING INFANTRY TARGET
R M
F
` INV EL 17.57 8 -
-
q,9- --._ _ - .. EMPL CEMENT.
O
O
TARGET EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.

r=' - -

m
--'SI 38
-

z
te'
a

' / t 9 77
t ` -
r 0 B
/
' .
f
, N 3832400, a 0
, +\f ?\
r 4 S N 383271 4T , \ 2 Y
r - 4 36- '+
" ?1
\ '?11• + f E 269865.
I NV EL lA
S q +
f Si
O
V u
It
+ \
s
`
1t
/
s tiro 0 \
\ ?+ J O M1
a
s+i t ' R 32365 BW'GSP-MRCN + 1 R
NIT 1 I 1567639 W U
_, +6? tf t;;°+ ` _ t •, SIT13o ¢
f+L&WED r N£-c:REES == i

18 - ,
/
?q_ - _.++ ++t ?
517 1 g
` ! g
t
SIT 35 11 _ _
SIT?28 g
0 20 - 40 60m
MOD

?C-135
D
C
B
A
I M L ' 3 Y :J
I Z d ri
E
E

/ j i
` KEY PLAN
/ w t r
r t ® t
^
v be \ /
r 1
r Ft0TEP PfHF, iFE£5 t
C-14 -146
SIT 14 /? 511 72 C-14 -144 -14
/ - -'"- -

2 ®r

\r C-14 C-14 C-14 -1] -12
-126
-176 C-13 -13
SIT 63 r
SIT 11 t -12 i
i
cC-12

.

t '
ysli70 F t
10
/
f r
1e.0

/'
C-13 -13 C-12
q

®
?
t \
t`t t t i F t
TT'64
y SIT 5
/?
S. SE E

i ?
\

r t
_
y
f t °
SIT N

?/ SIT 53
r
• /
N 76325 N07ES1

r NIT 2t
"'? l
y
• ` \
r SIT 52
\ / f
J
+
' , 1. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.

s i?T 62 0 r
16• '" ' / 0S 1
\ t
/ r
.- a t
'
-""-"? r
® \
O ?
`\ 2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT

-
. _ ' \:
--
t t t ?e / T I
' • •
f EMPLACEMENT DETAILS. M.IK-WIi?W6i

`
?+ t e y .,t
/
,
' 3. SEE SHEET C-505. POWERCENTER
EMPLACEMENT. FOR POWERCENTER ?-
t y SIT t t i
\ i
J
IT"
? EMPLACEMENT DETAILS
t
/ t
' lam"?? `i `""t"`
'-?. _ -
-T"`-f
4. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.
A?
t FOR MANEUVER TRAIL CUL-DE-SAC 1AYp1T. Q?
/ \
• 0
r \ t
y +
t l t t r \
110SI t -i
t T 49 f. \ 5. SEE SHEET C-504. MOVING INFANTRY TARGET
EMPLACEMENT. FOR MOVING INFANTRY
TARGET EMPLACEMENT DETAILS. iw-
? ? -
i?-
i r
® S
\ `
,
/
STT AS \ ?k• y
1P` SIT 46• -
- t i
.. i k2S
i ..
SIT 64 `
' '• s 0
tq.Q .... '• ..
yj
.. ,.., i
° ?
te."a"` Z
y

% O fir. >
u{'.
.
\y 0' /? °- i Slr 4
"- l
r
(t
}-
.-'`r c) w
Z Z Z
a
444 ¢
\ j
_.... _° / °
SIT 46 r? .__
-•?
?.
t
t
?y!^_-
"' -? $
' -
i
0 7 j a
'
I- y--
??.'''' ?

S i 62
*

W o

t 533W CSP}ARCH
x 381M
N 3832744.56
4.56 1

0 ---4-r-"Y.?
"--

r- % r"-'
-
f .lam
- ... a
W M

O

2
E 265456.34 1
yH.N INV EL 17.51 :-
p? J a.
Z
®
? ^

%? `_

"
'F° .• 517 61
,
,- f-=?'=- ` •\ -
._ _ ?
l'
?'¢?.- --
T 4051T-43 -

2 Ps4H7f-`D
IT v,,\\? V_ _ -
'$
rtp +s
istt TARGET SERVICE Rw 4
FIME F'FLES
iif+ N $ W
Z v
?-y \
_ ._ _ _ _
„?
S,3MWtR 361W CSP-ARCH ,! }
N 3632yy3f 30
£ 269656a 'M -
0 20 40 60.
_. _
INV EL, tTN9 t rr
t60D

?C 136
D
C
B
A

1 1 4 I 5

t

f t

Pc??kJE
.. ?
% s , `i`?t? ? .1
I

? .. / ? tNP;' ?

- _ .... . / SIT J'

/PLANTED PF:dE TREES
SIT X95 6EL$YI

L-14 -146
C-,. -,.. -,.
- t

t/ J ,I , IT t \l ft

fr ,!h f / /
51T 9
/
/
C-14 L-,? C-u -13
-126 -12
-138 C-13 -13

f -12
•. /// ?` 7
114 C-17 -137 C-13
IC-13,1C, 31C-12+--j

_ ?' W S ^ N
NOTES.
/
1

91 112
- pp Siir9
]
_. ,_ _

l
1. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.

w

- -
SIT !,IA
®
l `rf !
////?,p
'
?iki / /ry /ry ,
? slf 92
s F
t 2. SEE SHEET C-SO2. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
ENPLACENENT DETAILS.
2R.lF'RIIKRi7f-
1
.,SIT 110 f r
F
t / 3. SEE SHEET L MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.
FOR TARGET SERVICE E ROAD TURNAROUND
r
t
/ LAYOUT.
Kne'wr'a?arra:'r
'? 18.0 / 91 T 81

T 40 i_ _

z

¦¦ L:j
7
/ Z

1

'

,\ IN l
`,\ r ?c4° l N 3832400

?9,D
i N m 0.
U
a
N
a u
a
o

Q
80
4 lsi ?? ?
V
16'0 a ¢ ¢
1 V z

yV
JRGET SERVICE ROAD 6 D:

R 0 20 40
,goo

s
C-137
D
C
B
A
1 G s 4 0
1 9 Z 4 1 ?i
E

V •`l-
N
KEY PLAN

/
'?\4 -
•\
`\
6 -126
C-73 -is -17
', Sti
?I SIT 1
_; -12
/ "\\ \ \` '\ \ /
4 SIT 1 C-+2
C-13 -17 C-12 t
{{f
w ,
\ \ \ \
7 •\• \? \ ``, \ \ N 3872500 NOTESi
J \\ ``\
/ \ `\ \•
\` •`\
\ \ \\ \\
\?\
` 1. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
w

J \
\S \•
, \
. • \•x \S ._ ..

S _ SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY

TPLLAC WE ADET FOR SIT
EIP E NT DETAILS,

iFiR-,'?IB?YR'?

\\ \ •` ?•• \
S \. \\
S \
\\• 5 /?.._
„1 SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.
FOR TARGET SERVICE ROAD TURNAROUND
LAYOUT. ?-
\ \\
` .`
? ,. \ \\ \•\• \`\ \ \ ?EU iNE Ft?5,5
\ AU it
\
Z
\
?
v
JJ
? G ii Q Z
,
\
? v V
"^ \\ \ '
-?y ,°t
- ,? //
% / ?'

N 3832400 8
L
y Z'
O J
O a

a

ff / ?(f
f
=
a
N m z
Q
2
//
f ('\ R Q
a u Q
/ i
/9i } ti? N e a
c ?11:
sQ
` ( ?`?
s 8 v
( E E ;`
\` e ?
E
o 20 40 tN>m
W E t:eoo

•z7A
Q- 138
D
C
B
A
1
1 I e J 14
1 a
E
E

SIT 109 1 ' , --- ?
I ,1 68
C 14 C-14 C-1410 -12

- /
/
'.'
- -126
178 C 13 C 13 13
- - - -
1
/
/ / -
tz

E
I -u -733 c-t s

! C-13 -13 C-12
/
? i ?, x 3872800
rr

? NOTES.
1. SEE SHEET 0-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK

" EXIT TCN
TERLI
t? t

l _
? .. SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS. _
>N
r r ?T N 3832 6.1,
..26975 „
! ' ELT.29%:- 2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
SI 89- EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.

/
/'STONE CHECK DAM 3. SEE SHEET Ci12. MISCELLANEOUS
DETAILS. FOR EXIT DITCH GRADING.

alffiliff

- / ..-' CONTROL
•.. ?' N 383273,.97
_
E 2697,2.93
r r'
r ?. ? r
r
FOR YANETVER TRAIL MISCELLANEOUS AYOUT 5.
U AIL L CUL-DE-SAC L

. _
- EL 16.,3-
'

-
?

y

5. SEE SHEET C-5,2. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.
SERY ICE ROAD TURNAROUND
FOR

_
,57'7 88 + LAYOUT-
??-
EXIT DITCH CENTERLINE t
/ 6
6. SEE SHEET C-5 16. EROSION AND SEDIMENT
_ N 3832705.36 +
I CONTROL. FOR STONE CHECK DAM DETAILS.
- - 5311W x 381 W CSP'ARCH
N 7832677.82
E 269709.57 E 9732.43
77.76
rd '
+
_?'
IM EL 17.,0
r

-

+ N 7872700

p Z

_

i r? ,t -

64_
6 Y
_ J
533WB1W CSP-ARL`N
N 38726 2.12
E-269701.58 r - f1 ®SIT, T9
_,
1
?IT 78_
h
, r
rr /

Y, Jf'
1
/ f \

y

u
a
¢
= u
2:
a
.Z.
r
19
7 76
- - _ _.
TARGET SERVICE-ROAD 3 - g

SIT 7,
60.
- j Y W - N 36326001
FgOp W_

.2AF
39
D
C
B
A
1 1 ? s 4 o
1 2 3 4 5
t
1
------------
i
-------- -------
OI?SIT 133
si --
?i-
4. SEE SHEET C-504. MOVING INFANTRY TARGET
SIT 128 ( "-/ if ? / + f f + l f - EMPLACEMENT. FOR MOVING INFANTRY
y ? qr
SIT IOM
9 E
Y W
D? j w D
+N ° J m
¢
Yy Z u
SIT 98 j r .
° = rc
^ w o
i
? o
¢ z
N m ¢
S s/ Q. Z
N
a
a ° o
C U ¢
! G
F Z 17
8 E ? ¢
i
F
C-140
t 2 3 4 ?"'-"
S)r 738 IT 139 j
/ C-lt -1?6
.. r
t?$,IT t
106 !T 1OT 4 C-14 -13
-726
-138 C-17 C-13 -13

'
r
t
-
, C-13 -133 -n
S1,T 13? /? / 1 C-13 -i7 C-12

- + ? ? / t ? 3 N 3832
slr
S1T 130 ". ' F

? 5;7 737
r

iiy f
'...
rte'
? IT?1W o _17

5x

NOT
1. SEE SHEET C-SOi. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
T
N

/ r
??' {
f

;f ,, ,.. ?• ? r

T•1O7
I?
r
mo S.
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SEC
IO
TEAROENTEEIPLACEIENi.AFORIONA$RIT INFANTRY
2•
?
j
PC 3 /t 51T 102 f I
I
"
_ _ _ EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
SIT
T 129
SI

r tr
.. ..

r J. SEE SHEETNCiOS. PoRERCENTER
EIPLACEIENT.OE? IIP?RCENTER

?, `` ?\ "Yl
, r I r
+
r

I
?/
?

8 TARGET EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
IT_1t6..._ ................ ................"? , ? I I
i
t` f r
'_ .. r
i .
- `t
/
f /
I /
f r
.t'? ?'
? ?
-- ? t+?/ ?
1 t
/ ? /
I•
? J /
I
? IT 87
7832700
?
r
SIT
7OO
slr f/ C>
s / ?

i
r f
?
3\ I
. r `
1 j
FLIT 3 i r
?
P3NE FRE[5\
? 1j
..-. '.? •_ l / ? f
-t8.O - TARGET SERVICE ROAD
6 "

SIT 97
0 20 w 60.

32600 Q z
Z Z
1:800 5
I 7 ] d 1 r1

t

.AN °tn£ ?Nf.
\ 1
.S \ \QS1M1 % 1 -ARCH ?
\ N^
66832662 /?
773 t
SIT 1W \ r
i
, " '_-
? / N
E

?? 2
,?2
N/V690 161,66 /
\\ \
1 tlJJ832Si;l9W C5P-ARCH O
.... .,/ ..,., :..__.?....._.'_.
...._.,. ,..
.,......
/? \
ri
) i
t ?t ,269088 60
j
• J
y_ _lp

,
„`; 7
?
1t-ARCH'
JB7
8
NVyEL /6
k5
II
`

i
_.?_._._ .._._._-
f
_to
_It
C
,-
.': a.`
\^, .. -- S7 2e
M 7
2
E 26908 % `1
4 57332861823X81CSP-ARCM
yztt
E 269091.93
INV EL 1 .66 f
/
--'- ....-..:_-_............------------ - - -13 -12
A C , -126
^, ! Q `t8 y t
f
1
/' ??
r
I -12

\
?tt0
,
\ , _
r
';
-13 -137C-13
917.; ?SA ? t -1 C-12
"y <. .. ,. - ?, ., x?k \ p
\
r i
Y , c 0.7 167 l

1 p

'
`
t
'1 \
4 ? r? \H 4 .
`? ./ ,yf 2 \ t7
t
t!t t ,/ 63383 K 781W CSP-ARCH
\ N 3672772.96
E 26P25. 09 \
• , ?' ^-.?--

\ y
NOTM

r
r
IRV EL 16:'BA
jt•
,
t \ 1. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK

SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.

~
\
?
? ,
:fit t
1
t
® t I
I !} t 1 I
t 11 2. SEE SHEET 0-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
\\ '
? ' %
1 ?? 517 157 ! EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
r
f ,
}} S
\ ?\t
53383 K 38I MM CSP-ARQ _..........._...

t Ii.6,.6i?T

o
.
' -- / \
N 7832752.9}
\ xtt E 269122.4(
4 \ IkV EL wn t
27 w
?
" ar 4l J -
r
®S
62 o A.
k?t
/ ?

-
A,.,J832
.....,
x? z

r

T 124
SIT 125,
. p f

- LW7 w

z z

W

2
,,
; J

-,.
SIT 122
^
K

tl / . i

/ / i i
.
;n vh 1
?

f
+n

za

w M O

a

r
?
1
?
a a a
,"
Mf
,
_
/ a

t?(„tn Ff0 {nE TAF.` 5 +
?i
.o
` 38 CSP 71t ?i \ _
83

.> _

8 c

a u zz

1
691709 , r '1x t i
E j 7.26 t ltt
f
y? "? _.j
C??J'

N

6 w
a
J

/ ^'

Y SIL `15 1 :/

SP ARCH \
533 K tW C

I
`
682 \ ^? ? ?
3
f 92

;

®__.._..... :. ...,.
517 t20 at,an Fe Pity: TRus
/ / f '1
.27 \
l
/ J ` ' 0 20 so W.
\ r r/ / - slr tie
s,` x 563z xeoo

?C-141
C
B
A

1 7 Z d , ri
E
t

/ ,'
N
tEx.aee
r

c-1, -1„ -„
? 51T ,
-12
1
-
7
-126
-139 C-13 -17 C-17
-12 i
-133 -13

Pt ANi€U P?M", TREES /y
C-13 -17 C-12 C-12

?
all t

¦F
\`, N 393 OD

0 i \ NOTES,
r \ 1. SE SHEET SIDE9AR
C
t / \ TIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
SE
_

+I 1ONAR 2. ASEE RGETEEMFL CENENTTAFOR SIT INFANTRY

,,
tf ]71 EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
. y
`
IANEIXK DETAILS.
7. SEE SHEET C
?-
f t .
?
\ FOR TARGET S SERVI ERVICE E ROAD ROAD
TURNAROUND
LAYOUT.
-
1 \ nr991a-11
How-
t

N 3812 p Z
Q j 2

' Y z z
r c t \ o >
f
a w

\ \ N
r a c
a

\ "SIT I

n
W_
==

1 0 20 40 60.
\\\ 7832 00 t•900
•?
•ar
?C 142
D
C
B
A
1 1 2 1 4 ?
1 7 Z d t ?i

Z

`..
?

E
D
E

STONE CMECR DAY ..
N07
7D2
i
_
" p
KEY PLAN
E T
IT C
NTERLIN
31
70
03
-'
NNN B7716
.15
26
S
3
5
9
E 26 .
59
El EL
6
60
?
TE =1'i;'`

\ 4'?)?"I IT DITCH NTERL INE
3833715.9 L....,_.....__ ................ _,___,,.,._
/
269575.53 1
___._,.__.-_..__..._._........,.,,,__....,......_..,,,._....................,...

- C- -191
1
57
E\
"". 1W CSP-ARCH '
69317.28 16.95
\`
XIT OITCN CENTERL MME
833106
3
l5
-, 11
1- -19 C-19 C-19 -
C
-138 C-tl -73
1N 16.59 269577
5
1
7
L 6 .95
-13 -133 13 C-12
oil
517 159
.-.
?
t
/? . _ _._
SW'% 78118?CSP-ARCH
7873095:62. ....... __..... ----------
-

_...,_ »...___ ._ .._.._.__....._.
._.. _ ._._..,.

_ _ . ....._
E
269562.29 I
INY El 16
59
/ . NDTESt

- 17.0

. t STONE CXECR CAM

CONTROL POINT .......-
.... ,..._._...,....
-----
. -_.-:,:..---w^--^x.--.-.......
1. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
..- .............._.,,_...._._........,_. ........_.._._.__...__.,_....__...,......_.....,,,_._..........:._... ...,_......._ __ ,_. :f_.._,µ„383303ivB6.....__,_,_....,,a.,....,.........._ .,

517 158
1 E 269607.96
° EL 16.79 - ?'-'

__?__...,,...,r_._ ...........

.,......,_,,..._...__ ....__
..._.........,__...._,
2. SEE SHEET FOR STATIONARY INFANTRY

TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR i
EMPLACEMENT DETAILS. >Mi1P''GIRi'T
3. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS
_........ .._.,, .,._.....,. L ......_ ____.? .__,. ,,.... ` ,- DETAILS. FOR EXIT DITCH GRADING.
a - ... -

.
:
`
::
? ?
- _. .. . .,
.._._. 9. SEE ET 6. EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL.iC-51 STONE CHECK OW DETAILS. p7neFei?rpor
..
_
.
..._
,_
.._._.._,._. _
?,;_.._......._.__..._______......_.._,.....,.___....__.__. - -----------
.,,? .', N 3873000
i ? -

,

._

O

_

..
---- - -- - ----- ----

.
------ - ------------------- -----------
...
- - - - ---------

s
S.?T CHECK TAM ,, - Z
517 11
o

V
/ 3 N 38 %590
4
E 66 91 5

Si T 1
9
/'_'_'
..
, 9 V
? •
3
-
_ -----
------ , _....... .._.., ._
_..._..."_-_ -
....... - p W

o a
'
:
i
t SIT 196 a _
.,.__._.._?...___...?._...,._..._ 7 STONE CHE
..__ - i1?B32907.
E 269664.1 DAM .. ,
..
INT""_..__ ...................._.._.._, ___...._..- _
- c u ,,,

6• _. , EL 1
Q
-
i• IT 195 t1
NX38721
E
26966
X9CENTERL INE
t f!_at(?LG vitiG SaEES
2

p N p
a
a
/?

""'"'"'"""""0" 0' •..

??• / `1. rj
i - * ' e SIT t ......... _,.____..,._._._.. '
r

---S1L:.192, ...._------._._..
t
?. ._....._..........,.2...J

1

EL 68
533W % 3817M CSP-ARCH
N 3832891.99 533W
INV6EL616896 E 269

INV EL
..,

38, MM CSP-ARCM

5036

16.96 t N 3832900

N p a
f ... o:

ti Z p

e a

_
Y ? / 1 1?
tr
_ l
517 190 1
8 \ .. f g ??.. /?, \ ? g ? 1
a
® ,
- - --------------

0 20 60.
1T 139

?C-143
D
C
B
A
1 d t 3 4 Z)
t 7 '] dri
E
E

OF (( KEY aYl N

ii +7-

y E I
1 J

`? ..
s . t T?17
\'a"
.. /?
/? t 1
' C 14 C-tt C-tI -tl -72
-126
It - ' 1 , 4.. /? I -138 C-,3 -13 -13
i /? N 3833100 -12
t /
SIT IN C-17 -733 -73

? t
t o.t (

? C-12

C-t3 -13 C-12
S
s
?
0 s ?
t [[ / i

?
?
SIT
i75
i -? -'

? NOTES.
.,, •^ a

37

0 .'t

f
SIT 67
1

/
?? 1• SESEE SHEET C
CTIONS. FOR -501, ROAD ROAD SECTI0ISSIDEeALN
a
y
-`- ''(` kk

H i, `
j ,
,
? '
4
- f
i t r
t

r 1\1 /
// 2. SEE SHEET C-S02. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.

inR .rwlaii1?

'

?
!? 7. SEE SHEET C-SOS. POMIERCENTER
P
A
NT
PONERCENTER
FOR T

? E i s ..
..
/
• .
.?.._.....__.__
y EM
CEME
.
,
L
MENT DETALS.
EMPLACE

. {
` i
/
t -'__....._......_.__..._--_-.---_.. _._.,,.. -

1 SIT 6 1 [ /',+ (/(?yy_,%/ ?D,,
tt v S

t_
T IS? 't
-------- - ------------ - ..

z
-

_. -.__.r ?..
ol
l
' r
s
' ..
...
c /?
?9S I I.
O ` " fi
4'
`?/ 7
S
-SIT
t (

F

? = N

N m a

Q

?
a
CL Z

? ?

-
? „t ?/

f
t •
x ------ - - - -----

N
I
Q
/ e a m¢
,
,\/? i TARGE T SERVICE ROAD 8 !
'
- --. _ . . __....._ ..... ..........._.... /
n
__..._..
? ....__.._.._ ._.-___._ -.,_..___._._. a ._. O
/
0 20 so 60tH
?
4T 155 ., .. T 1J8 I:ew
a
.?
?C-144
D
C
B
A
D
C
B
A
1 C J -f :.T
1 ] d F

Z

' ` \
? N

\ ,
stY1? t1 lk
¢¢?? tll ll t
ltd , xEr aetl

-1? -u6

F
1"o C, s 1
p„ 1' , -lac-u
-12
C 14 -14 C-14 -IS
"
t
i St
? -126
tt
FL aNYfn ?En_
lt
? rEE^ -138 C-13 C-73 -13
arty k t
N 3633100 -12 ?

'
l -13 -133 -13
t
t
`
\ H
tttt \t t
° C-12
C-13 -13 C-12
i
t
?
tnt ant t
ffis 1 ??
\ \
, ,l
l
.
D,
tij

t EXIT
N 387 ITCH CENTERLINE
17
86
NOTES.
E 269
EL 15. .
7.78 tth 5t ,
9`t\(
{
'
t

i 1. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.

t (
t
?r\ p °1
# 2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
l EXIT DITC
N 3632992 CENTERLINE i
C
79 CRE -DAY
' EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
\
E 269053. ,
0 NT
7 `l CONTROL P
-
f
3. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS
+?-
EL 16.15 38627. T3 DETAILS. FOR EXIT DITCH GRADING.
33 \
4 8 R. SEE SHEET C-516. EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL. FOR STONE CHECK DAM DETAILS. 1M-WFNSt?rpM-

EXIT DIT H CENTERLINE l
.
N 363297
E 26949 .4
12
E N 3111
]000
E, Q
\
?
? ^
\ It ,
?
5334 381
N
7832962
2 CSP-ARCH ]3W %381
tZ1
6
1 -ARCH _
,
.
IMY EE168i 9p19
2
?
t Nv EU 16
?
` Z Z
\ ,
l 5
v 8 J
5]781 x 38 ±ARCX
m ! \
1 t
v
? ?.,
? ? Z
LL
E 268d2

!
14 I
/
ai
l
? ?
\
?

- w
? ? ?
a L?
INV E,L 'j W C
T
{
8
t -ARCH ?I> 1y
Z Q Z
' 62
'„
lo
l\\ ,U1 \ JD = V Q

1 ttt `lll\ i1,
1t it, t?l' \ V

z Q W O
= N Z
z
' N
^
11 It ty, ??y?l;
t? Q ¢
Q
pt,tNlEb PiV :R£FS i
,St 1, tf` 6iFtliET RVICE ROAD 9 S
! a ¢
?? E SI7 1 7 1?ttt ?? Ut t O ? J
?
Z
t N ..
.

G
f \ ,
o zo w 60m
1:800

.2w
?
C-145
D
C
B
A
D
C
B
A

7 7 Z 4 19
E
E

acx PLAN W
N 3833.00

C-14 C-14 C-14 -13
-126 -12
-738 C-13 -13 -13
-12

' C-13+_I 33 C-13
C-12

......... ?.
i
STONE CHECK TAY
TOK CHT3
7
1
- - C 13 13 C-12 !
a

Ep
-?
..... _ ._ .' T
R
T 0
t
N
t 1 E 269.91.73 i

L IXE
I
E
CH 13.00 N
,_ _.._ ._ 17X'38333
E 269.90
9
I EL 16.27
i
....._ ' ` -- ... _ _ .. _. ._ _ _ ..
.
15.C EL, 16.18 § t
i ; X33833303860 CSP-ARCH

, INV EL 916.19
t
` EXIT DIT6WkNTERLINE
tt
26
.6319 i + t ?! NOiE51
ROAD AND SIDEWALK
1
SEE SHEET C-501
,E
9
EC 16.16 t t i t
t
t ?l `\
/ .
.
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
m
Ex IT 017tH CENTERLINE
N 3831383.77 1
.
? y
t
57383 x 781 YII GSP-ARCH n

\
"' 2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
EMPIAGEMENT DETAILS.

R161R'"?18LQ9F'tf
t E 269.9
j.
29 1 M3833294.91 t
269.91
11
"
E 16.' .
y
! 00
\ M 3
3

S• SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS
t \
\ DETAILS. FOR EXIT DITCH GRADING.
._ .. -
? 1* e ,iN k3"L'v[ES .• SEE SHEET C-576. EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL FOR STOW CHECK DAY DETAILS. q-661a-?ra:,e
s?
ii
i
i
-
,?
t /
/?
I - \
I
XL(EN7E AL NE
.I 01
N 3 Z

?-- z z z

S w

j `

0 Zi-s-_
EL 1
,
z W
a
E? v J

\
178
Si
6!4
E
\
u

J
V

?

4
- S N
Q O

i
\ - f
q

N 7833200 ZZ
6 N 0] Q
? N

1 a a L?
r ¢

0 20 40 60.
IT J62 ., >•? 1S 7:600

.aE
C-146
D
C
B
A
1 L 1 ?+ :J
1
E
E

Ncr Ray N
f
1
N 3833400
C-1t -1?1 -71
C-11 C-tt C-1+13 -fi
-126
-178 C-13 -13 C-13
-12
-13 -733 -73
C-12
C-13 -13 C-12 Z
?
t

NOTES,
I I. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AM SIDEWALK
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
\ TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT

\\
Y
a.TP) FINE T;lUS'-,. EMPLACEMENT DETAILS. i1flR-aetaf1iT

\\ ..N 3833300
c
W'86TY'?i011-
?
t
t .T
?

r J`sa

\
y
a
u
Q z

`
w
z
Z
\ z
a
J
a
Z
W
t?
J
_
_
E W
2
y> 2
i Q
= U Q
O
u p
i
W

* V
f

r
?/
3 a
M a
- \ ?
383
00 N
J O y
Q z

1
{ °u o
a

t
\
,
`
t
?' J
3:

\ 1 i IT 17
, r 4 - ti

I
20 so eom
i I 100
?
.28M
?
C-147
D
C
B
A
I ' 1 1 4 0
1
2
o PROPOSED
PROFFI "LE
GRADE
0.12sx? 0_12sx
1.3 z
D "
E%ISTINC
-GROUND
NOTE:
1. FOR LIMITS OF CLEARING SEET SHEET C-198
CLEAR NG LIMITS.
3
FILTER FABRIC COVERED WITH GEOGRID ISEE GENERAL NOTE 2)
305 COMPACTED FILL (MINI
305 AGGREGATE SURFACE COURSE
ACCESS ROAD VAR
N.T.S.
ZZ
• ?E%ISTINC
GROUND
4
5
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. FILTER FABRIC AND GEOGRID SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF COMPACTED FILL. S
e D
a.
?a
19-31
FINISHED
°w 0.250, 0.250% GRADE
VARIES 2972 IR29 1829 2972 5c VARIES
C 3' 3' 3.1 C
FINISHED fIL TER FABRIC COVERED WITH GEOGR ID (SEE GENERAL NOTE 2l
°a GRADE 305 COMPACTED FILL (MINI
152 AGGREGATE SURFACE COURSE
U 0.250% 0.250% FINISHED
GRADE m" snsa.w. m
3` 5 TARGET SERVICE ROAD AND MANEUVER TRAIL
FILTER FABRIC COVERED WITH GEOGRID (SEE GENERAL NOTE 2) no .w m..w ...i
FINISHED 305 COMPACTED FILL (MIN) N.T.S.
GRADE
305 AGGREGATE SURFACE COURSE
VARIES
NOTES: (MIN. 3357) VARIES
4572 6106 VARIES VARI
1. LANE WIDTHS ARE 3353mm FOR SERVICE ROAD 1. PROPOSED
2. WHERE SERVICE ROAD 1 WIDENS AT PARKING AREA. - PROFILE iFF
Ca CROSS-SLOPE OF 0.250% SHALL EXTEND ACROSS GRADE
! ??w o .? .ARr
PARKING AREA FROM ROAD CENTERLINE. PARKING AREA u SEE NOTE 1 0.125% -
k PAVEMENT STRUCTURE I$ SAME AS SERVICE ROAD w w
? w
w
PAVEMENT STRUC TORE.
w w qqq iw i
EXISTING _____
f CQ AGGREGATE 3;, 3e1 W Z B
B SERVICE ROAD SURFACE -
COURSE EXISTING 4 W
-`( N.T.S. GROUND i 8
Y Q Z N
` - NOTES: FABRIC COVERED WITH GEOGRID (SEE GENERAL NOTE 2) 8 ¢ D O
BLADE E%ISTING AGGREGATE SURFACE
TO ATTAIN REQUIRED CROSS-SLOPE OF 0.111% . 71ILTER
05 COMPACTED FILL (MIN) 1'a°^ 2. FOR LIMITS OF CLEARING SEE SHEET C-198. 5 AGGREGATE SURFACE COURSE _(n W a N
??' 1 CL CLEARING LIMITS. .
11 ~ Z l u
CC ROAD UPGRADE 3
'f i V? Lid .?' o N.T.S. w E N W
pq?, 0.250% 0.250%FI WISHED ¢ N m
C..e..--.Q ).a. S 3• GRADE J O
2
FINISHED- a j U ¢o
GRADE 1219 t a o
FILTER FABRIC COVERED WITH GEOGRID (SEE GENERAL NOTE 21 Y F W
LAJA GRADE FINISHED 305 COMPACTED FILL (MIN) y 3 j
305 AGGREGATE SURFACE COURSE 102 AGGREGATE w
152 COMPACTED SURFACE COURSE f
F ILL (MIN.) FILTER FABRIC C £ A
(SEER GENERAL NOTE R2)
BUILDING ACCESS ROAD
r:>u
N. T. S. SIDEWALK
N.T.S. Q.wwcw.
L, - O 10 1
1 2 3 4 5 '°"°"' °' ?'
ENCLOSURE( I )
1 1 1 3 1 4 5
t
k
8
GENERAL NOTES:
DIRECTION OF d

FIRE
1. CONCRETE SHALL DEVELOP A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE _
SEE SHEET C-801 AND C-802 STRENGTH Of 28 MPa IN 28 DAYS. 6
FOR TOP OF BERM WIDTHS 6
RCEMENTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF REINFORCED
2. O
RAILROA
D NC
C
CONCRETE: CONCRETE STRUCTURES SHALL BE PRECAST
OR CAST-IN-PLACE.
S LOPE 2% TIE CONTROL POINT
25 ITYPI 3. AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE
L102 x 102 } 457 REVEGETATED OR RESURFACED CONSISTENT WITH THE NATURAL
12.7 x 100
T 11 -
1 SURROUNDINGS. GROUND COVER SHALL NOT REDUCE TARGET
EEL ANGLE
S
(SEE NOTE 5
152
J
FILL SLOPE 3:1 VISIBILITY.
E
ZCOMPACTED
SLOPE 2 FINISHED <. PLACE TREATED RAILROAD TIES AGAINST CONCRETE WALL ON
I
F IL 152 GRADE L102 X 102 X 12.7 X 100 STEEL ANGLES SPACED A MAXIMUM
OF 900 ON CENTER. ATTACH ANGLE TO CONCRETE WALL WITH
152 IMIN7 Be a CONCRETE ANCHORS. S.

1 FILTER FABRIC SLOPE 211
(MI N. 1 5• ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

(SEE GENERAL NOTE 6) CAPILLARY WATER BARRIER
6. FILTER FABRIC AND GEOGRID SHALL EXTEND T LIMITS OF
O
pp
s
#13 flEBAR 0 300 O.C. E. W.
(CENTERED IN WALL AND SLAB) FILTER FABRIC COVERED WITH GE OGR ID (SEE GENERAL NOTE 6) CAPILLARY WATER BARRIER AND COMPACTED FI
LL. a
it
SECTION &

N.T.S. C-5
2C-502
---
' ---- ---- F ---_ o
, A r .,
C-5 2C-502 ?o

'
CONTROL POINT A
SEE SHEETS C-801 AND 152
C-802 13? T2 152 (1
FOR COORDINATES AND ELEVATION RAIL GAD TIE
CONTROL POINT B
15 50 TYP.
50 SEE SHEETS C-801 AND C-802
FOR COORDINATES AND ELEVATION g g
g33

z
1 127 F €_ W W
( Y Z w
X d Z W U
\ SEE
FOR
TR SHEETS C-.01
TOP OF BERM AND L-BO2
WIDTHS g
g
4 q d
\ ICAL
ELEC
XOUT
W
s
\ 381
381 X T6 TYP. / Z
w 0 ? W W
\ / 5y O J
W 0 F
W
a>
? z E ?
\ W = u ¢

/ ? \ E W Y
z W Q
N GO ¢

o Z
o

Y O
W >
Z
8 b j z o
E K F
£ W ?
tY i N
SINGLE STATIONARY INFANTRY TARGET (SI T) EMPL ACEMENT
N. T. S.

.m 66 a2WB

C-502 D
H
D
C
B
A

B

I G i It 0

e
DIRECTION OF GENERAL NOTES:
a
IRE FSEE SHEET C-801 AND C-802 1. CONCRE
TE SHALL DEVELOP A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE
FOR TOP OF BERM WIDTHS STRENGTH
OF 28 MPa IN 28 PAYS. C r
l
2. EMPLACEMENTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF REINFORCED
RA LR'AD N CRETE; STRUCTURES SMALL BE PRECAST
CONTROL PAINT
SLOPE 2% E OR
25 (TYP)
'102 x 102
457 3. AREA DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE
12.7 x 100
1 RE VEGETATED OR RESURFACED CONSISTENT WITH THE NATURAL
GROUND COVER SHALL BE REDUCE TARGET
SURROUNDINGS
STEEL ANGLE
(SEE NOTE 5 152 FILL SLOPE 3:1 .
VISIBILITY. E
COMPACTED PE 2FINISHED 4. PLACE TREATED RAILROAD TIES AGAINST CONCRETE WALL ON
FILL, 15P GRADE L 102 X 102 X 12.7 X 100 STEEL ANGLES SPACED A MAXIMUM OF
'
152 (MINI
° 900 ON CENTER. ATTACH ANGLE TO CONCRETE WALL WITH
CONCRETE ANCHORS. 4

F g

i
152 SLOPE 2X tt77 ji
FILTER FABRIC

MIN.)
(SEE GENERAL NOTE 6) CAPILL dRY WATER BARRIER
1 S. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
q?

p
6. FILTER FABRIC AND GEOGRID SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF
FILTER FABRIC COVERED WITH GEOGR IO (SEE GENERAL NOTE 6).
U13 flEBAfl v 300 A.C.E. W.
(CENTERED IN WALL AND SLAB) CAPILLARY WATER BARRIER AND COMPACTED FILL. a8i
i
SECTION A
N.T.S. C-5 3C-503

_- _____ ___ ____ ___ ____ ____ __
_ ____ ____ ____
__ O
'
A _ A
nm
rnWe
mnm

/ C-5 3C-503 C-5 3 C-503
/ w ra mom ,,.,.
/ ? en
/ m
TOE OF BERM -

1676
(
CONTROL PAINT A
152
1372 CONTROL POINT A
152
SEE SHEETS C-801 AND C-802
152
13T2
15 \
SEE SHEETS C-801 AND C-802 -? FOR COORDINATES AND ELEVATION
FOR COORDINATES AND ELEVATI ON RAILROAD TIE RAIL DAD TIE CONTROL POINT 8
1525 0 TYP. Sp 15 50 TYP. SEE SHEETS C-801 AND C-802
SO FOR COORDINATES AND ELEVATION
Z

1 127
CONTROL POINT B
SEE SHEETS C-801 AND C-802 127
I
/ $_

Y w
w Z w
Y
w r
[
\ FOR COORDINATES AND ELEVATION
SHEETS C
801 AND C-802 W d O U
\ -
SEE
FOR TOP OF BERM WIDTHS pp
4 ¢ Z ¢
\
ELECTRICAL ELECTRICAL
BLOCKOUT ¢ O
W d
g
\
Y BLOCKOUT /
381 X 76 TYP. Z
W o Z
0 w
` 381 X 76 TYP.
m
N ? J
z f
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
o
¢

g = U ¢
u ¢
N y

.Fd
./R+
/8'88+++ J f0A m
O
D
N Z
¢
gag
"?"? - - - - -
-- - - -
- - ° .
a o

8000 AT SOM TARGETS
y 3 w
? Z z
O
10000 AT 100M TARGETS , 5 ¢ ¢

A
N
F

DOUBLE STATIONARY INFANTRY TARGET (SIT) EMPLAC EMENT
N.T.S. _
.m 67 v 2BB
C-503
C
B
i
C
C
E
F
1
2 1 j 1 1+
0
TOE C-5 4 C-504
OF BERM O C-5 460-504 _
?
CONTROL POINT B
SEE FOR
\ COORDINATES AND ELEV.
ELECTRICAL BLOCKOUT RAILROAD
1 (SEE DETAIL 1) TIE (TYP) 2m
152E o
E E

I 2m CONTROL POINT A
I SEE C-802 FOR

COORDINATES AND ELEV.

45• v 5•
1397
?
I 152 (MIN) (TYP>

- ' 30.000m 8
PLAN
N.T.S.
B
C- O c- 04 MOVING INFANTRY TARGET EMPLACEMENT
N.T.S

NOTE: SEE SHEET C-802 FOR GENERAL NOTES:
RAILROAD TIE TOP OF BERM WIDTH. 1
CONTROL POINT CONCRETE SHALL DEVELOP A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF
15?_ 26 MP. IN 28 GAYS.
25 (TYP) DIRECTION 2
-_ SLOPE 2% 3 OF FIRE . EMPLACEMENTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF REINFORCED CONCRETE:
CONCRETE STRUCTURES SHALL BE PRECAST OR CAST-IN-PLACE.
x100 • 3. AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE
FILL SLOPE 660 COMPACTED LI02 002
152 FILL STEEL PNGLE REVEGETATED OR RESURFACED CONSISTENT WITH THE NATURAL
31? (MIN) 152 7 (SEE NOTE 5) SURROUNDINGS. GROUND COVER SHALL NOT REDUCE TARGET
GRADE SLOPE 2% VISIBILITY.
TO 152 FINISHED
DRP)N ?v 0.0 152 (MIN) GRADE 4' PLACE TREATED RAILROAD TIES AGAINST CONCRETE WALL ON
L102 % 102 X 123MM % 100MM STEEL ANGLES SPACED A
SLOPE 27. (MIN) FILTER FABRIC MAXIMUM OF 900MV ON CENTER. ATTACH ANGLE TO
CAPILLARY WATER BARRIER (SEE GENERAL NOTE 7) CONCRETE WALL WITH CONCRETE ANCHORS.
FILTER FABRIC COVERED WITH GEOGRID 5. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE
(SEE GENERAL NOTE 7) •13 REBAR a 300 O.C. E.W. INDICATED.
(CENTERED IN WALL AND SLAB)
6. THE EMPLACEMENT MAY BE REVERSED OR MIRRORED FROM WHAT
SECTION A IS SHOWN HERE. IN ANY CASE, THE PROTECTED END OF THE
N.T.S. C- 04C- 04 EMPLACEMENT IS ALWAYS NEARER TO THE FIRING POINT AND THE
ELECTRICAL BLOCKOUT IS ON THE PROTECTED END.
7 FILTER FABRIC AND GEOGRID SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF
457 CAPILLARY WATER BARRIER AND COMPACTED FILL.
0 76
FINISHED =F" EIIC-bE COMPACTED EtlEYEME ? 1 1 \ F
3 381 510 381
w
GRADE _ FILL ELECTRICALS
FILTER FABRIC ? BLOCKOUT
CONCRETE WALL
SECTION DETAIL 1
N.T.S. C-5o4C-504 ELECTRICAL BLOCKOUT DETAIL
N.T.S.
7 4

U ~ I
- z z
W W
0
W
Z Z ? J
N U J W
? w a r
Z E W
O = U D
2
U ¢
f w
N
J NO 0] z
z
a o z
? w cD
s z a ?
0
f s
d I
I
^ 66 ? 268
C-504
1
t 2 1 3 1 4 5
t
s
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. FILTER FABRIC AND GEOGRID SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF COMPACTED FILL. 3
DIRECTION _ 2000 3. FILTER FABRIC SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF CAPILLARY WATER BARRIER.
OF FIRE
CONTROL POINT TOP OF TIMBER WALL
zx
705

3 1 776
1524 1 EXTEND WALL TO A POINT
305 ABOVE FINISHED GRADE
1
COMPACTED FI
L SLOPE 2X
&
-
E

r
L
-
3
1
SLOPE 2X FI
R FA6R fC/ EE
ERA
T
E
-NOTE -K
¢
L
E
G
N
L
TINDER .ALL
ISEE SHEET S-504 (MIN.M 152 MIN. CAPILLARY WATER BARRIER FINISHED GRADE Fj
FOR RETAINING FILTER FABRIC COVERED WITH GEOGRID (SEE GENERAL NOTE 2)
WALL DETAILSI CONCRETE PAD (SEE NOTE 31 F pj
COMPACTED FILL a ¦?
,-PILE S UPPORT

SECTIO A
N.T. S.C-505 C-505
A
-505 L-505 rv1n u?irKmn m

m
CONTROL POINT 8
SEE SHEET C-802
FOR COORDINATES
AND ELEVATIONS

CONTROL POINT A `-
'
SEE SHEET C-802
_ FOR COORDINATES
AND ELEVATIONS ff

g Z

w
2134 Y ¢ Z
J ~
Z
305 Z
w O
_ Z
W W
f

TOE OF
SLOPE
3:
- N O J
W 0_ w
Q

?O Z f J

£ S U
W f
U Q
f w
LU
a w
N w
J G3
O Z
W
NOTES: Q OC OL
K

1. CONLRE TE SHALL DEVELOP A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE
$ 7 O:
0_ U w
O
o
STRENGTH OF 28 MPA IN 28 DAYS. .+
r w
2. SEE SHEET E-508 FOR CONCRETE PAD LOCATIONS. IS
Z

3. DESIGN OF CONCRETE PAD IS THE RESPONSIBILITY
OF THE CONTRACTOR. fr E
POWERCENTER
EMPLACEMENT
N.T.S.

m d

D
C
B
A
D
B

1 1 1 j 1 4 1 !D

C
E
F
1 L
e
a
toooo
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
1700 1600 2550 2500 1650
2. FILTER FABRIC AND GEOGPID SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF COMPACTED FILL. a
DIRECTION 3. SEE SHEETS C-507 AND C-508 FOR FIRING POSITIONS DETAILS.
OF FIRE
5000
a
(DOWNRAN
CEI 4. SEE SHEET C-514 FOR RAILROAD TIE STEP DETAILS.
3 l 3
1? ?1
FABRIC FILTER COVERED ?FINSHED E
WITH GEOGRID (SEE GENERAL NOTE 2) GRADE

o
o
o W
¢
wz ? $
a ?LL w° ?a 6a NORTH/SOUTH CENTERLINE FIRING BERM SECTION i
w a
N. T. S 0

)[?
r iu
,
4
'g
TYPICAL FIRING LANE POSIT ION LAYOUT
N. T.S
100000
SERVICE ROAD 4
TOP OF DITCH
SERVICE ROAD 4 vco
TOP
OF DITCH
3
305
Ox 305
3
1 (- ? 1 inn . ansKmrc ro
2x zx
FABRIC FILTER COVERED FINISHED
WITH GEOGRID (SEE GENERAL NOTE z) EAST/WEST CENTERLINE FIRING BERM SECTION Gfl ADE ou??...s
N. T.S COMPACTED FILL
N 3832120.26 N 3832176.68 SERVICE ROAD 4 ao
SERVICE ROAD 4
E 269910.16 E 269966.87
TOP OF DITCH
TOP OF DITCH EL 20.40 EL 20.40
NORTH/ SOUTH
DIRECTION
pro .o.
•1 I 3. OF FIRE CENTERLINE OF 't I 3:
j N 3832127 .31
(DOWNRANGE) FIRING BERM N 3832162.57 I x
E 269917.25 E 26995269
** j

w
NI EL 20.40
EL 20.40
I
-
21 tiM
N 3832113.20 01 °!
N 3832183.74 Z
`
E 269903.07 3:1 wl 3:1 N 3832155.52 N 3832169.63 3:1 3:1
96
2 4
EL 20.40 ?I N 3832134.36 N 3B32i4i.41 E 269945.60 E 269959.78 ?I 20940
EL Y ¢ Z
E 269924.34 E 2699
7.42 N 3832148.47 EL 20.40 EL 20.40

N EL 20.40 -0
EL 20.40

E 269938.51

Z
i EL 20.40 j J N w
LO J
LAN E 1 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 LANE 7 LANE 8
LANE 1
0
or
__

J 2 3.1 A+ 2

I LANE _
1 1
LLJJ 2% ______________ d

? U m

/
?
? ? ¢ -
w
f ?
z

LEAST/WEST
_
_>
z
w ..
CENTERLINE OF _ o m LL
FIRING BERM
3:1 3:1 = _ -=- 3:1 3:1 ¢ 0.
CENTER OF --. C d O
c-- RAILROAD TIE __= g u

I Z

I
?
Y G Z ?
3:1 1 3:1 TYPICAL FIRING LANE CENTER RAILROAD TIE 3:1
OF 3:1
I
STEPS
RAILROAD TIE
STEPS RAILROAD TIE (SEE NOTE 4) £
21
ISEE NOTE 4)
,
A (TYP.) F (TYP.)
A - ROOF TOP FIRING POSITION
PLAN B - STAND
NG FIRING POSTION
B (TYPA N. T.S C - WALK - N F GHTING FIRING POSITION
I
I
C (TYP.) E (TYP.) D - PRONE FIR
NG POSITION

D (TYP.) E - WINDOW/BUNKER APERTURE FIRING POSITION
F I R I NG BERM F- KNEELING FIRING POSITION _
.a. >e azae
N.T.S C - 506
1 ') 7 A F .......?....

i

C
C
E
F
RA LROA
TYP.
FRONT VIEW
N.T.S.
200
RAILROAD TIES
TYP.
500
250
(? CL FIRING POSITION
??? ??A\Y\ FRONT FIRING
POSITION
200
RAILROAD TIES
TYP.
SIDE VIEW PLAN
N.T.S. N.T.S.
KNEELING FIRING POSITION (F)
N.T.S.
50.100
WOOD
BRACING
x100
W
WOOD
BRACING 600
300
50.100
WOOD
BRACING
I

0 19 PLYWOOD
50x150
WOOD
BRACIN
FINISHED GRADE
6?
20OX40OX100 300 ?
CMU BLOCK
TYP FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW PLAN
N.T.S. N.T.S. N.T.S.
WINDOW/BUNKER APERTURE FIRING POSITION (E)
N.T.S.

1 7 7
FRONT FIRIN(
POSITION
GENERAL NOTES: g
d
1. CONCRETE SHALL DEVELOP A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
OF 29 MPa IN 28 DAYS.
2. ALL REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE PER ASTM A615. GRADE 60.
3. AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE
RE VE GETATED OR RESURFACED CONSISTENT WITH THE NATURAL
SURROUNDINGS. GROUND COVER SHALL NOT REDUCE TARGET €
VISIBILITY.
9. ALL WOOD FRAMING SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED. ALL WOOD A
CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE WITH HOT-DIPPED GALVANIZED NAILS. .d g
5. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. g
O?o ?Cy?
601
-WOOD POLE °a o
FRONT FIRING
POSITION
CONCRETE
PLAN z
W
N.T.S. d Z W
w
w
Z Z ?
j y O J Z
a> w a
z f
1000 0
go U N
? N a
Z w Q
J NO m H
NOTES.
d OL ¢
1. WOOD a
POLE SHALL BE TREATED WITH A j ¢ W
RESERVATIVE TREATMENT. $ 0_ o
150
W
W Z
f ¢
SIDE VIEW s t
tl i
N.T.S.
STANDING FIRING POSITION (B) _
N.T.S. .m T1 ?2ee
C-507

3
I
C
C
E
F
L ? I I
6990
00 700 3000 2840 150 DIRECTION - ?
1730

TOP SLOPE 2Z (MIN)
OF WALL
COARSE p•
1 •19
AGGREGATE
3 FILLER 00 % 450
BENT DOWEL o
•19 X 450 00 (TYP)

700 BENT DOWEL (TYP) 0
150
_ SLOPE 2Z DRAIN BLOCK00T
150 p' - ' 150
8
op'op •• •p •o ••p ••p •. p•=p• ••0 ?"op ejj ?A• 150
-13 0 300 O.E..
AGGREGATE SLOPE 22 (CENTERED NCALL WALLS AND SLAB)
(MIN
)
.
WALK
FILTER FABRIC 600
CAPILLARY WATER BARRIER
(SEE GENERAL NOTE 7)
300
SECTION O
N.T.S. C-SOB C-508 CL FIRING POSITION
FRONT FIRING
POSITION

DIRECTION
OF FIRE
C-51 C-512 (DOWNRANGE)

15
0 2500

2
200

150
2100
j _I
1_
fSY ?' A'•P'•A
• pot .?0
A••APo ?
0
150
150
1420

•.•°.AGGREGATE e
o WALK pe
A
, '

30
0 r? COARSE
B
e
v a
AGGREGATE
FILLER
GRAN BLOCKOUT
150
TYP)
(4) •19 X 450
BENT DOWEL
e 300 O.C. (TYP)
(3) •19 X 450
BENT DOWEL
a 500 D.C.(TYP) r„ ..,
1 ? I
PLAN
N.T.S.
WALK-IN FIGHTING FIRING POSITION (C)
N.T.S.
e
GENERAL NOTES:
1. CONCRETE SHALL DEVELOP A MINIMUM COMPRESIVE STRENGTH
OF 29 MPa IN 28 DAYS. 9
2. WALK-IN FIGHTING POSITIONS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF REINFORCED 6
CONCRETE: CONCRETE STRUCTURES SHALL BE PRE-CAST OR 5
CAST-IN-PLACE.
3. ALL REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE PER ASTM A615. GRADE 60.
4. AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE
REVEGETATED OR RESURFACED CONSISTENT WITH THE NATURAL
SURROUNDINGS. GROUND COVER SHALL NOT REDUCE TARGET
VISIBILITY. E
5. ALL WOOD FRAMING SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED. ALL WOOD 6
CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE WITH HOT-DIPPED GALVANIZED NAILS. E
6. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. S
7. FILTER FABRIC SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF CAPILLARY WATER
BARRIER. O;v 43
SAND BAGS
500
300 mnro vnssKmn m
NOTE:SAND BAGS SHALL BE
POLYPROPYLENE WITH A UV
INHISITER. w
SIDE VIEW
N.T.S.
500 0
SAND
6iZING
50.100
WOOD
BRACING
60
20OX40OX100 SIDE VIEW FRONT VIEW
CMU BLOCK N.T.S. N.T.S.
TYP
ROOF TOP FIRING POSITION (A)
N.T.S.
Z A
PLAN
N.T.S.
PRONE FIRING POSITION (D)
N.T.S.
F
g Z E
W
d U
g Z W
4 ? z
z
O Z
W Z
N ? J Z
z E
O = U
U Q
w a
N
2 w ¢ O
? O] r
Q d UI ?
0 LL
a o
W
a ?
< E ?
a
i
r 72 s 260
C-508
C
c
F
J
RANGE

GENERAL NOTE:
I. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. SEE SHEET E-509 FOR RANGE LIMIT MARKER POWER AND LIGHT
FIXTURE MOUNTING DETAIL.
3. LOCATION OF LIMIT MARKERS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BY BASE RANGE
SAFTEY OFFICER.
1220
51 9MM EXTERIOR PL
RED AND BLACK Si
STRIPES SHALL ANC
DOWN TOWARDS THE
RANGE
2MM X 102MM
EATED WOOD POSTS
ELEVATION VIEW SIDE VIEW
RANGE LIMIT MARKER
N.T.S.
NOTE:
1. DIAGONAL STRIPES ON LIMIT MARKER SHALL ANGLE DOWN TOWARDS THE RANGE.
2. LOCATION OF LIMIT MARKERS (4) TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BY BASE RANGE SAFTEY OFFICER.
A

i
M [
3W sY?
m SQ[
Z E
q w
Z _
Q z
8
z
J Y
Q
f
U U
ti ¢ f
f W
N
Q W ¢ J
J C) 0 W
z
a ¢ a a
a o
I w
y ? I z
f ¢
€ ? ? F
tl £
?r >3 a2WW
C-509
C
C
E
F
1 L
e
7.315M TOTAL WIDTH GENERAL NOTE:
5
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
' 3658
152 DIA.
STEEL PIPE H
2134
p E
A
127 DIA. STEEL PIP
19 x 127 PI Ear t3
A m Y3
PADLOCKS
> 4m
25?
C. ROADWAY
4 ROAD SURFACE 22 DIA HOLE THR 10 HOLE F
PIPE AND PLATE 25 1 7 PADLOCKS
NOTE: ALL EXPOSED STEEL TO
BE PRIMED AND PAINTED.
(
LOCK DETAIL
N.T.S. u
SECURITY BARRIER ELEVATION ?•=K??
N.T.S.
25 DIA. x 152 HIGH
STRENGTH BOLT. m
NOTE: ALL EXPOSED STEEL TO
BE PRIMED AND PAINTED.
HANNEL
25 SPACER 06 LO7 % 9.8
fC C4 STAN DARD
06 LONC
32 41 12 DIA. STEEL PIPE 25 DIA. STEEL PIPE
152 DIA. STEEL g w
GATE POST 165 DIA. 13 THICK PLATE 5 178 tttttt Z
Z
WELD TO PIPE 25 27 DIA. HOLE STEEL PIPE 4 8
127 DIA. fE p 4
c
Y
STEEL PIPE
152 DIA. 127 DIA. g a z
STEEL PIPE STEEL PIPE 7 w
5 DIA. ern J W
STEEL PIPE y w a
z £
CONCRETE 27 DIA. HOLE d 2 U m
THRU BOTH PLATES 5 £ U Q
£ W }
165 DIA. X 13 THICK PLATE STEELAPIPE 279 z 279 13 Z
WELD D T TO PIPE 127 DIA. STEEL STIFFENER WELD w Q
STEEL PIPE TO PIPE AND PLATE J N 0] 7
L 25 DIA X 51 HIGH 152 WIDE X 305 LONG X 13 6 (NOTCH OUT FOR BOLT HEAD) a 6- a w
STRENGTH BOLT. THICK STEEL PLATE N
a o
457
8 ? J Z
AGGREGATE BASE ~ w
£ tr
5 d £
POST FOUNDATION SECURITY BARRIER DETAILS f
N.T.S. N.T.S.
1 F
i
1.83M
GATE LEAF
;_STRAND VERTICAL BARBED
WIRE APRON
BBED WI E TOP RAIL (TYP)
, AR
BRACE RAIL
1
L HING )TRUSS R D
(TYP) E
9
NOS (TYP.)
II I I II I BOTTOM ENSIGN
WIRE (TYP) 13.
I II I I II I
FLEXIBLE
GROUND STRAP I II I 1 II I GRADE LINE w ?<p •i
I U I I U 1 ?s?
L _I L _1 =p
PERSONNEL GATE
ELEVATION
N.T.S.
ES

*: FECE POST
8
CO AWG SOLID
PPER WIRE
0.3M
TOP OR BRACE RAIL ATTACHMENT MOLDED EXOTHERMIC WELD
OR APPROVED CLAMP-TYPE
N.T.S. FITTING OF COPPER (TYP)
Y
^
M NOTES
1. THE •8 AWG CONDUCTOR
W \
/
19 DIAME TER COPPER-CLAD SHALL BE BONDED THE
FENCE POST AND THE HE
STEEL GROUND ROD TENSION WIRE.
2 FOR GATES USE A •6
BRAIDED COPPER GROUND
STRAP TO CONNECT GATE
TO GROUNDED FENCE POST.
TIE WIRE TIE WIRE GROUNDING DETAIL
(0.4M O. C. MAX. AND (0.4M O.C. MAX. AND
T
N
S
WITHIN 0.I FROM WITHIN 0.1mM FROM
TOP AND BOTTOM TOP AND BOTTOM .
.
.
OF FPBRICI OF FABRIC)
H-BE P/A ROUND POST
LINE POST ATTACHMENTS
N.T.S.
0.3M
P? O CYQ,
n LOCK PIN (TY
?Y
?'( 1
P.) yi n BARBED WIRE (TYP.)
I 2
BARBED-WIRE APRON
ON EXTENSION ARMS
TO RAL
E RAIL
CORNER.END
OR PULL POST I!n
TENSION BAND TENSION BPND
(0.4M O.C. MA%. AND WITHIN 0.1M
FROM TOP AND BOTTOM OF FABRIC)
FABRIC
TENSION DAR BARBED WIRE OR
TENSION
U-REAM
TRUSS RO ?•-CARRIAGE BOLT WIRE
(9.5 MIN. DIA.)
ROUND POST T SIGN BAI( TO
ENGAGE EACH FABRIC LINK
BRACE RAIL CLAMP DETAILS END OR GATE POST DETAIL TENSION BAND DETAIL
N.T.S. FASTENING DETAILS
N.T.S.
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL Of MENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. DETAILS SHOWN ARE TO CLARIFY RE OUIREMENTS AND ARE NOT
INTENDED TO LIMIT OTHER TYPES OF FENCE SECTIONS AND METH01
OF INSTALLATION.
3. WIRE TIRES. RAILS. POSTS. AND BRACES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED
ON THE SECURE SIDE OF THE FENCE ALIGNMENT. CHAIN-LINK
FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE SECURE
O AREA.
O 4. FENCE SHALL HAVE EXTENSION ARMS EXTENDED OUTWARD
FROM THE AREA BEING PROTECTED.
5. C-SECTION POSTS SHALL BE INSTALLED SO THAT THE VOID
INSIDE THE POST IS COMPLETELY FILLED WITH CONCRETE UP
LATCH TO THE TOP OF THE FOUNDATION.
STANDARD HINGE 6. SWING GATE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH PADLOCK AND
ASSEMBLY LATCH ASSEMBLY.
N.T.S.
N.T.B. 7. GATE FRAME SHALL BE A MINIMUM 48 MILLIMETER NOMINAL
(ROUND) OR 50 MILLIMETER NOMINAL (SQUARE). GATE FRAME
SHALL BE OF WELDED CONSTRUCTION OR SHALL BE ASSEMBLED
° o
( TRUSS ROD
45 35• (9.5 MIN. DIA.
9.5 PLAIN PIN
RIVETED FLUSH (TYP) 9.5 PLAIN PIN
RIVETED FLUSH (TYP.) Ea
CONCRETE BASE
LINE POST CORNER POET
EXTENSION ARM DETAILS
N.T.S.
TRUSS ROD AND BAND
N.T.S.

7
75
STEEL POST SCHEDULE
USE AND SECTION MINIMUM OUTSIDE
DIMENSIONS (NOMINAL)
CORNER,END & PULL POSTS 73 O.D.
TUBULAR - ROUND 63 SQUARE
TUBULAR - SQUARE 89 X 89
C-SECTION (ROLL FORMED)
LINE POSTS 60 O.D.
TUBULAR - ROUND 57 X 43
H-SECTION 57 X 43
C-SECTION (ROLL FORMED)
TOP & BRACE RAILS 42 O.D.
TUBULAR - ROUND
TUBULAR - SQUARE
38 O.D.
H-SECTION 41 X 38
C-SECTION (ROLL FORMED) 41X 32
d
USING HEAVY FITTINGS. AT CONTRACTOR S OPTION A WELDED
HORIZONTAL BRACE MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF TRUSS RODS TO
BRACE WELDED GATE FRAME. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROPER RIGID CONSTRUCTION OF GATE
SUPPLIED.
GATE POST SCHEDULE
GATE LEAF WIDTH OUTSIDE DIMENSION
(NOMINAL) (NOMINAL)
1
83M 73 OD
. 63 SO
NOTE:
BOND NO.6 FLEXIBLE GROUND STRAP
TO GATE POST AND GATE BY MOLDED
EXOTHERMIC WELD OR APPROVED
CLAMP-TYPE FITTING OF COPPER.
F
x U
> Z
p• W
z
4
Z
0
N U J U
w o Z
z f w
W
O = U Y
U ¢ Z
f N J
w ¢
J NO m r
a o
U
E ¢
w ?
CHAIN-LINK SECURITY FENCE DETAIL
N.T.S.

1 L .3 4 ;.7
t
a

m
1829 ( TYP. ) a

E
GENERAL NOTES:
305 (TYPI FINISH FLOOR
FINISHED OX SL OPE ELEVATION (FFE) EXISTING EXISTING 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
GROUND GROUND
GRADE 0.250X 782 2.1I1-TEft FABRIC AND EOGRID SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF COMPACTED FILL.
5
,._ --------
1! ?1 j
i

COMPACTED FILL
a.

H
OTE: ELEVATION OF FINISHED GRADE AT INTERFACE E X I T D ITC
N

i
WITH BUILDING EXTERIOR. SHALL BE 152 BELOW FFE. N.T.S.
OGE OF ROAD o F?F
I g
R = 20M R = 20M
1
GRADING AT BUILDING EXTERIOR
N.T.S.
o
9
ry
RAM ITTP.I
? ? "toy i Pii
77.9707°
I o
TARGET
SERVICE RDA q ^?
_
-
?
\\
vcA
51.
i
Sy I e
718.
MAINTAIN .25X SLOPE TO EITHER
SIDE OF ROAD CENTERLINE
OF CUL-DE-SAC OF CDLOEAC

T.]29M 102.8293•
,
9 00
? -
A .,
s _
P
Q I
y a ?

TARGET SERVICE ROAD TURNAROUND
?
N.T.S.
,a
,
e a«
o
q -
ry
p O ? U E
e
1i g W
a z .
j
4

R= 20M ? R= 20M Z

W O
Z
? W J
I O N O J ¢
EDGE OF ROAD - W d
E W
O
VARIES VARIES = L¢j N

MANEUVER TRAIL CUL-DE-SAC £
= U
f O
N.T.S. ¢ W ¢ ¢
J N 0]
O J
J
¢ o_ 01
¢ O W
n
N
X 1% 0 L
3 3 J Z

w
g t ? F
q
FILTER FABRIC 305 COMPACTED FILL (MINI oa c
COVERED WITH GEOGRID
(SEE GENERAL NOTE 21
EXISTING
GROUND

MEDVAC LANDING AND BIVOUAC AREA
_
F
N.T.S.
v zae
.a. 7
C-512
4
...?a_ O
C
B
E

E
f
1
I!
k
8
BIVOUAC AREA
I
i GENERAL NOTE:
i ?
i 3.05M 10.973M 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
I
I 3.658M 3.658M 3.658M
I
SINGLE SHEAVE CAST
I ALUMINUM STATIONARY 127 DIA ALUMINUM BALL
i TRUCK (SEE NOTE)

i n
STROBE LIGHT
CONTRACTION JOINT (TYP.)
I (SEE SHEET 5-301 FOR DETAIL)
a. pg
i f s
00 I
Y
SWIVEL ®
?e_?
I SNAPS a8i
4
i 76 MIN. TOP CIA.
I ?
•10 BRAIDED
I POLYPROPYLENE
HALYARD (
5 WALL THICKNESS
ALUMINUM FLAGPOLE
-
-
--
--
-------
i -
-
-
-

152 REINFORCED CONCRETE PAD
PLAN
nn. s.nswrw..e
•13 C300 O.C. E.W. AT N.T.S. .may
63 BELOW TOP OF SLAB U

I 17 230 CAST
ALUMINUM CLEAT
i FINISHED GRADE m
FINISHED GRADE
I
152 CAPILLARY WATER BARRIER SECTION FILTER FABRIC (SEE NOTE 1)
N.T.S. NOTE:
1. FILTER FABRIC SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF CAPILLARY 750 ALUMINUM w5
WATER BARRIER. MIN. FLASH COLLAR g O
BIVOUAC PAD Z
CAULKING COMPOUND Y ' LU
N.T.S. d O •
c 2 ?
SEE PLANS FOR LENGTH
OF CULVERT EXTENSION 4 HARDWOOD CENTERING WEDGES W
.r A:i N O J Q
'• W d w
BLACK ASPHALTUM PAINT ON ^
EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE
SURFACE OF POLE AND SLEEVE LL - Z f O
ASSEMBLY BELOW GRADE TAMPED AND DRY SCREENED SANG O = U V!
_ _ .: .: 16 GA GALVANIZED CORRUGATED STEEL TUBE I U
130 MIN. BUTT DIA
• .-• Y' 4 WELDED STEEL WEDGES
13 THICK WELDED STEEL PLATE Z 0 w Q
------ _.___._______.____..__. --
_________________ o? 150 ?1 "• NEAT EXCAVATION N 0) J
•--'"-'"""- DIRECTION OF FLOW
- ---- IA. + 600 COPPER F. O
-------- ____------- _-------------------- -------------- 19 D
CLAD GOUND SPIKE 13 THICK STEEL SUPPORT PLATE Q ? If
O
CLEAN OUT DEBRIS FROM INLET WELDED TOR BOTH PLATES ' a o
CONCRETE N
! U f
NOTES: 100
1. RELAY EXISTING PIPE ENDS AS REQUIRED TO ELIMINATE 6 O
ANY EXISTING OPEN JOINTS. 450 f
2. PIPE MATERIAL OF NEW TO MATCH PIPE MATERIAL OF u Q
600 MIN ¢ ? ?
EXISTING. NOTE: LOCATE TRUCK ON NORTH SIDE OF FLAGPOLE tl £
3. SLOPE OF PIPE EXTENSION TO MATCH SLOPE OF WITH STROBE LIGHT 18D DEGREES FROM TRUCK.
EXISTING PIPE.
CULVERT PIPE EXTENSION FLAGPOLE
N.T.S. N.T.S. _
?• n szee
C 513
I
C
C
E
F
i I G
1 / I /7p SBJII I
116--? Z
BB--?? I 7pJ I 1 I
I I 14 5 i7 818 I I ?
1 1 I I I ' I ' 9 I I
I I I I 1 19 101 IOB
I 1 I I 1 ' ? ' ? I 1
I 1 I I I ' I I 1 1 I
1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I
?I 1 1 I 1 I I I I I
i 1 I I I I 1 I I I I 1
rcl .
' I
' reat6r BOOT ....
LL' I I ? .I I 1 I I
, I tT
ITT ?711-
?1- - 6CI 6D I_ _ 99 6D '_ -105 I OD
I 2C2 Y 1 2D ? 49 4D--'
I I I I D' I 1 I I I I
' I I 1 1 1 I I I ' I
I 1 I I ' I I I I I 1
I I I I 1 I I I I I I
I I I I 1 I- I I I I I
I I. 1 I 1 I I I I I I
1 I I I 1 I I I I I 1
I I ? I I I 1 I I I
BZO
N.T.S.
152
152
152 PVC
BZO TARGET BOOT FINISH GRADE
HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINT
100 X 100 WOOD POST
FOR PANELS (BY OTHERS)
CONCRETE
115 2 VC
PLAN VIEW SIDE VIEW
N.T.S. N.T.S.
TOP OF
0 BERM
I
GENERAL NOTES:
OF 29 MPO IN 28 DAYS.
1. CONCRETE SHALL DEVELOP A MINIMUM COM 7 PRESIVE STRENGTH
2. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
3. GEOGRID SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF COMPACTED FILL.
BZ B
TARGET NORTHING FASTING TARGET NORTHING FASTING
BOOT BOOT
IA 3032102.34 269832.45 6B 3832109.75 269846.08
iB 3832103.11 269833.87 6C 3832095.80 269%1.82
2A 3832103.67 269834.89 6D 3832096.58 269853.25 3 .
2B 3832104.44 269836.31 7A 3832110.31 269847.09
2C 3832090.49 269842.06 7B 3832111.08 269848.5

M

2D

3832091.27

269843.48

eA

3832111.64

269849.53 2
3A 3832104.99 289837.33 8B 3832112.41 269850.96
3B 3832105.77 269838.75 BC 3832098.46 269856.70
3 3
-?_
_ 4A 3832108.32 269839.77 8D 3832099.23 269858.13
1(- -? 1
_ 4B 3832107.10 269841.19 9A 3832112.96 269851.97
i
4C
3832093.15
269846.94
9B
3832113.74
269853.40
4D 3632093.92 289848.37 t0A 3832114.29 269854.41
SA 3832107.65 269842.21 10B 3832115.07 269855.84
COMPACTED F-S
HED
GRADE

GEOGR ID 5B

3832108.42

269843.64

10C

3832101.12

269861.59
O
FILL (SEE GENERAL 6q 3832108.98 269844.65 10D 3832101.89 269863.01
NOTE 3)
SECTION
N.T.S. C-514-514 BZO TARGET BOOT LOCATION 4
BZO FIRING LINE
#16 DEFORMED STEEL
REINFORCED BAR
(SPACED 61OMM)
RAILROAD TIES
(152 x 204 x 2439)
RAILROAD TIE STEP SECTION DETAIL (PLAN)
N.T.S.
DEFORMED STEEL
NFORCEO BAR
LROAD TIES
2 x 204 24391
RAILROAD TIE STEPS (SIDE VIEW)
N.T.S.
NOTES:
1. STEPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF TREATED RAILROAD TIES
AND SECURED WITH 916 DEFORMED STEEL REINFORCING BARS
DRIVEN VERTICALLY THROUGHT FIELD-DRILLED HOLES.
THE BARS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM LENGTH OF 460MM AND
SHALL BE LOCATED ON A 610MM SPACING.
2. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE EXTEND THE FULL LENGTH OF STEPS.
2 Qrl
- Z
E
W
Z U
Q Z
Z O Z ' N
J
0 w
N O J Q
w a w
Z S o
O m Q
2 U N
U ¢ o
F W
Z w N Z
Q U, 03 J
J O J
0_ N W
2 d U
a o .N.
U E
- f
's Q

TARGET BOOTS
N.T.S.
1 2
C
C
E
F
,
1 95
19MM A-C
MARINE PLYWOOD
OMM CHARACTER
INE WIDTH
1
0
I
50
J
L
20
Cm
FINISHED
TARGET BOOT
(SEE NOTE 4)
SINGLE RANGE LANE MARKER
N.T.S.
400 METER LANE MARKERS
LANE MARKER TYPE CONTROL POINTA CONTROL POINTS CONTROL POINTC
NORTHING EASTNG NORTHING EASTING NORTHING EASTING
400M LANE MARKER 1 SINGLE 3832271.40 269537.38 3832272 47 269537.97
4DDM LANE MARKER 1-2 DOUBLE 3832293.18 269579.41 3832294.23 269560.03 3832295.28 269580.65
400M LANE MARKER 2.3 DOUBLE 3832338.31 269579.05 3832339.31 269579.76 3832340.30 269580.46
400M LANE MARKER 34 DOUBLE 3832370.26 269602.99 3832371.22 269603.73 3832372.18 269604.48
400M LANE MARKER 4-5 DOUBLE 3832400.83 269628.]1 3832401.76 269629.56 3832402.69 269630.36
40DM LANE MARKER 5-6 DOUBLE 3832430.00 269656.35 3832430.85 269657.21 3832431.72 269658.08
4001A LANE MARKER 67 DOUBLE 3832457.31 269685.36 3832458.12 269686.27 3832458.92 269667.18
400M LANE MARKER 741 DOUBLE 3832483
.05 269]16.02 3832483.]8 269]17.00 3832484.51 269]17.99
400M LANE MARKER 8-9 DOUBLE 3832506.91 269748.17 383250].59 269]49.12 3832508.27 269]50.13
4" LANE MARKER 910 DOUBLE 3832506.31 269793.20 3832506.92 269794.26 3832507.53 269795.32
400M LANE MARKER 10 SINGLE 38 32549.06 269816.41 3832549.64 269817.49
800 METER LANE MARKERS
LANE MARKER TYPE CONTROL POINTA CONTROL POINTB CONTROL POINTC
NORTHING EASTNG NORTHING EASTING NORTHING EASTING
8" LANE MARKER 1 SINGLE 3832430.76 269171.59 3832431.85 269172.13
8ODM LANE MARKER 1.2 DOUBLE 3832491.59 269204.42 3832492.64 269205.04 3832493.69 269205.66
BOOM LANE MARKER 2-3 DOUBLE 3832550.79 269241.52 3932551.81 269242.20 3832552.83 269242.87
800M LANE MARKER 34 DOUBLE 3832607.55 269282.42 3832608.51 269283.16 3832609.47 269283.91
8" LANE MARKER 45 DOUBLE 3832661.57 269326.99 3832662.49 269327.78 3832663.42 269328.58
BOOM LANE MARKER 54i DOUBLE 3932712.77 269375.13 3832713.63 269375.99 3832714.49 269376.86
8" LANE MARKER 6-7 DOUBLE 3832760.31 269426.06 3832761.12 269426.97 3832761.93 269427.89
800M LANE MARKER 74 DOUBLE 3832804.74 269480.29 3832805.4] 269481.26 3832806.20 26948224
800M LANE MARKERS-9 DOUBLE 3832845 .51 269537.30 3832846.19 269538.32 3832846.87 269539.33
800M LANE MARKER 9.10 DOUBLE 3832882.49 269596.61 3832883.09 269597.8] 3832883.70 269598.93
800M LANE MARKER 10 SINGLE 3832911.30 269656.16 3832914.83 26965].25
RANGE MARKER LOCATION

0
ACE
POINT B
? I
NOTES:
L MARK ODD NUMBERED LANES WITH BLACK NUMERALS ON A WHITE
BACKGROUND. MARK EVEN NUMBERED LANES WITH WHITE NUMERALS
ON BLACK BACKGROUND.
2. INSTALL EACH MARKER USING 2-100MM x 100MM TREATED WOOD
POSTS. PLACE POSTS IN 152MM DIA. PVC PIPE "TARGET BOOTS"
INSERTED INTO THE GROUND. FOR ADJACENT LOCATED
MARKERS. DOUBLE MARKERS USING A SINGLE SHEET OF
PLYWOOD WITH 3 WOOD POSTS SHALL BE USED.
3. BOTTOM OF MARKER 914MM ABOVE GROUND.
4. SEE SHEET C-514. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS. FOR TARGET BOOT
DETAILS.
5. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
FINISHED
CONTROL POINT A

DOUBLE CONTROL POINT R
RANGE LANE MARKER
N.T.S.
24,

19MM A-C
MARINE PLYWOOD
OMM CHARACTER
1 LINE WIDTH

a

pd
6
I E
g!
0 ??S €F
ACE
POINT C
B O
- 2
W
d Z W
D, m
Z Z J
N O J Q
H
Z f O
O 2 U N
U Q O
E W W
Z N Z
N m Q
J O J
Q Q 0_ U
D
a O
W
j X
'a S X
Q
]q 1'v 200
C-515
3
I
C
C
E
F
1 L
NOTES:
fL STONE CHECK DAM
1. SEE PLANS FOR LOCATIONS OF STONE CHECK DAMS AND TOP OF STONE
COORDINATES AND ELEVATION OF CONTROL POINT. CONTROL POINT
CONTROL POINT ELEVATION REPRESENTS THE MINIMUM (SEE NOTE 11 DITCH BOTTOM
ELEVATION OF STONE ACROSS FULL WIDTH OF DITCH.
2. USE CLASS 1 OR CLASS B STONE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE 1 r' 2 1
WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOUND IN ARTICLE 1042-1 OF THE
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.
3. FILTER FABRIC SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF PLACED STONE. FILTER FABRIC (SEE NOTE 3)
SECTION g
N.T.S. C-5 19 - 19
DITCH
457 MIN.
f TY P.1
1
B
C-51
519 EROSION CONTROL STONE
(SEE NOTE 2)
TOP OF STONE
CONTROL POINT
(SEE NOTE 1)
FILTER FABRIC ISEE NOTE 3)
STONE CHECK DAM
N.T.S.
N.T.S
NOTES:
1. THICKNESS OF CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 152MM.
2. SEE SHEET G-002. VICINITY AND SITE LOCATION MAPS. FOR LOCATION OF
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.
1 7 'J
T.
cl
GENERAL NOTE:
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
GROUND LINE
S.
O$_
OR WOOD POST ?5 Fc
ABRIC a$
FILTER FABRIC SKIRT

VARIES
?048 MAX.)
157 MAX. pp
IN ACCORDANCE WITH b @ L? E
JORTN CAROLINA DEPT. - Z
]F ENVIRONMENT AND y w
JAT URAL RESOURCES
Y ¢ Z °
K
PREFABRICATED MATERIAL
2
OR WOOD POSTS
° J U
N
R> W 0 ~
z f z
w
3° = u s
ELEVATION ?? w N
m
o m zz
o_ n a
SILT FENC 0
E t¢ a o Z
N.T.S. .. U N
a a z m
NOTES: fr i f
1. FOR SILT FENCE SPECIFICATIONS. CONSTRUCTION. AND MAINTENANCE tl 1
REFER TO SECTION 6.62 OF THE CURRENT NORTH CAROLINA EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL AND SHEET C-515.
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES.
2. SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED AT THE LIMITS OF CLEARING
(SEE SHEET C-148. CLEARING LIMI TS I.
e 1•s2ee
C-516
/1 F ..... ..?.?...
I
SECTION q
N.T.S. C-514 -519
1 2 3. 4 5
t

.. Cam' f 1• «o.nm «

0[m....__...._._......_._,.._...._.........
x0. Ope..+re
BW 0
LL

m.g 3 :
..
.
.
---- - ---------
MA CwN

'^-_-?_-?-.? .zae K Ko. r .___lsrna:.ln- o. ?
..., a9. Ko. t,e==y `t,_
._._.
•
?
'
r
n .zsm • Ko.oon Ko.o)

C «o. Ko.s d.?.ro: a:s9n? o:)e.+oo gs .
C

?
Y
o.om «a.oo• .asn 3!• Ko.s n-.w. Ko. ?
a.o?. «o.z3s Ko.tam Ko.osn srzan-wtw?cr
/J?
fj?jp
? ";;?f ?'µ,j,[?" 2n ?K0. ? KO. ixs «0.0t xl.x3w KO.Ne K0. •b.x KI.I
'9bp` ?
iR7flf???
(.
j. K0. •Oln K0.19n K Kt?.SOa Kl.S3n K,.]I• s??
i
m fa?l•f??
(
,??? ` ? ? .20n :[ 5• KO.tlm K0. .33m K0? ? 8? KIn6m Kt.Ne .fin K,.
K,.6am ifA r as
?,? ?`?`` \ \``` KO.tBe K0. •? ?D.SN KO.ale X82• K0.39n ?.? K Ne K1.?M Kl.lxm • t.b]m Kt.80v
•
?? -_
? ?
B ?
• •
l • Z B
?
r
9• K0.33m K0. Kt.06e K0. 9C0.9)m K0..9m ,.25n K,.,je K,. t6m K,.qn ? K,.?x•
;,?`y • • w
y (,?
? ? ZQ W
f // K0.N .Nn KO•!Sn K0.02e .•5? KO.C2n Kl.l)m M,. Kt.Nn Kt.x9e • {
fxe K0.afin •9n K0
4Sm K0
4zm
)9n K0
31n
??
7 BAe KO a0 w a
.
-
.
.
.
.
11 • • ? U LL
`C.ISI..
K0.tfm KO.Me K ?KO.Sam «O. SOm
f
= y

U
u) 0 u
? 1 f f Q a° a
• ?-- / a u z
u w
j
za
A Ko

X 01
1 2 3 4 5
{'
yx, v+ex_".J
ENCLOSURE( ?„ )

C
E
F
1
ABBRFVIATIONS USED
BZO BATTLE SIGHT ZERO
[ CENTERLINE
CSP CORRUGATED STEEL PIPE
E EASTING
EL ELEVATION
FFE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION
M METER
MM MILLIMETER
MIT MOVING INFANTRY TARGET EMPLACEMENT
N NORTHING
N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE
PC POWER CENTER EMPLACEMENT
R RADIUS
SIT STATIONARY INFANTRY TARGET EMPLACEMENT
STA STATION
TYP. TYPICAL
C CUT
F FILL
C-147
C-145
C-141
AeE
C-142 , _ -
C-138 ' ° 1'; i1 C-1
I 1 1 9 I
LEI
EXISTING
' 'M
NEW
GENERAL NOTES:
1. BLOCKS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET REPRESENT THE SHEET MATRIX.
BO LARD °
2. ALL CONTOUR INTERVALS SHOWN AT 0.25Y.
CABLE PEDESTAL 3. SURVEY DATA OBTAINED BY U.S. ARMY ENGINEERING AND SUPPORT
CONCRETE MONUMENT CENTER. HUNTSVILLE.
FIRE HYDRANT l 4. HORIZONTAL SURVEY DATA OUTPUT IN UTM. NA083. ZONE 18. METERS.
S. VERTICAL SURVEY DATA OUTPUT IN NAVO88. METERS.
GUY WIRE a

POWERPOLE 6. SEE SHEET C-148 FOR CLEARING LIMITS.
T. ALL ELEVATIONS AND COORDINATES ARE IN METERS UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN.
SANITARY SEVEN MANHOLE C17 8. ALL SLOPES ARE TO BE GRADED TO 3:1 UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN.
SIGN ;J- 9. DEMOLITION DEFINED ON SHEETS C-125. C-128. AND C-131.
SOIL BORING
SURVEY CONTROL POINTS
WATER METER }f
PTa NORTHING IYI EASTING IXI ELEVATION 121
BUILDING CORNER _ _ 0
CLJIOD 3832992.231 271952.566 22.142
CONCRETE PAD
CLJ200 3832899.082 271822.454 21.769
GRAVEL ROAD ° ° - - - J116 3833071.326 272186.111 21.204
FENCE
MAJOR CONTOUR
MINOR CONTOUR - - - _ NOTES.
TREELIKE 1. ALL HATCHED AREAS ARE WETLAND AREAS.

C-146 TUND AREAS
WE
?? 2. CLJ 100 AND CLJ200 ARE Y•{ DOMED BRASS SURVEY WORKERS SET IN
CONCRETE AND STAMPED CORPS OF ENGINEERS. YEAR 2005. WITH POINT
ROAD CENTERLINE

SIT DESIGNATION.
3. J116 IS A NORTH CAROLINA GEODETIC SURVEY CONTROL MONUMENT.
MIT
t41 = F{}?
PC LJ -. AJ116
-,? __
-------- - ?y1J 100`-?
--
--
'•.
?.?C1J200

C-135

•'-C-13
4`
6 '

N
G
200 100 0 200 400
C-131
i
0 n F
?r yy
®`iE f?t
V U a
- z
' W Q
2: w o
z J
o
2
w Z
m o
> W
? Y n
O u u z
U Q Z
f W
N
J NO m d
w
a a o '^
1 _ U J
H W
6 j ? w
` x a Z
w
u
} ? I

3
3
1 7 1 .S 1 4 1 :1
t

'
?' STONE CHECK DAM \ RT,'-? - [
--
f CONTROL POINT
N 3832025.60
E 269907.17
EL 17.00 ,?f/ ?/ / C-14 -146

C-14 C-144 C-14
? ?
EXIT DITCx CENTERLINE
1
RE
? " C-14 C-t4
-125
-726
N 3832018.46
E 269909.13 A
A
BIVOIIA
CEN7ERL INE 17.91
-178 C-13
EL 16.32 N 3832000
? C-727
4
r -133C-
C-
ALAH7ED >'iH TREES C_1Y J C-12 ? Hi
?
'
Y
7
A4
H

\ - ?
l NOTES:
` 1. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
t SECTIONS. FOR CC ROAD UPGRADE AND
CLEARING LIMIT.
1 rim
2. SEE SHEET C-513. MISCELLANEOUS
\ DETAILS. FOR EXTENDING EXISTING
CULVERT. amr-

1 -

k 3. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS
DETAILS. FOR GRADING AT BIVOUAC
SECURITY BAR IE \ AREA.
pF--?-
l 4. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS. w
N 3831900 S. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS -
DETAILS. FOR EXIT DITCH GRADING.
i
1 6. SEE SHEET C-516. EROSION AND SEDIMENT
l CONTROL. FOR STONE CHECK DAY OE TAILS.
1 1, T. SEE SHEET C-108. SITE LAYOUT PLAN.
^
w
FOR BIVOUAC CENTERLINE ELEVATION.

-
? "
1 E o j w 6-
`
B1T887.94
E 2 929.12
N -
' N c0 J w
INV EL 16.29

Y ? w EL
Q
Z
6101M CSP
N 3831886
07 o Z ¢
- U
.
E 269950.86 U
INV EL 16.24 u ¢ w O
EXISTING 610MM SP U, Z
TO BE DEMOLISHED 610W CSP ¢ m m
N 3831862.44 O
E 269957.47
INV E
16
63 a y
.
L
610W CSP a $ °a
N 7831879.04
E 269959
68 w
Z
O
.
INV EL 16.65 N
3 J
PLANTED P1. TREES PLANTED PINE T..REES N 7831800 Y
f

g g g
0 20 40 60m
c600

.zw
?C 131
D
C
B
A
1 1 1 1 1 4
1 ? 3 1 4 I 5
t
i

KEY PLAN N

• c
t C-14 -746 6
6
N 3832300
1
.rw,<. ..«m. \ .

m 533W 381M CSP-ARCH / _ _
N 38-12-11!;16,
&ai69907aa,<.
`--_

{
-LAXTsO PIN, T=8F5 C-14 C-t 44 C-14

C-14 C-74 C-14 C-179 -125
EL 17.19 ? _
% -126
-
-
1
f= -178 C-13 C-13 C-13
- -12
i
53383 x 381W CSP-ARCH
N 7832265.75
?
gy C-134 -133
C-12
E 268883.97 ran. m
INV EL 17.19 /
m. .ra-. 537W x 381W CSP-ARCH
N 3832224.00
SIT 20 E 269920.20 i -' -- ._- --_- /1'
_- f '•: ?'-"` / 1 C-131 -13 C-12
-
INV EL 17.08 %
A
/ SIT 19
•c am*533N4 x 381W CSP-ARCH-
N 3832231.40 /:'
11
1 __ - - ° i
d
/ _-E 269927.50
ax"•
'SIT iG
- =alf - ?'
>?_- ?• -'SIT 10:'?
?_to ?
NOTES:
l° 533W x 381MWrCSP- 'SIT
-
9_f _
N 38725{ RCN
/
'

1. SEE SHEET C-109. SITE LAYOUT PLAN.
_
?' S73W 387TIM E,269948.d9
- ': \ _ ffNV EL yi.03
/ f
' FOR MEOVAC CENTERLINE ELEVATION.
CSP-ARCH:'
po1
N
3832
_ / S 3W
3 3 38
1W CSP
-AQC}k` - - _= i
07
1
1 2. SEE SHEET C-109. SITE LAYOUT PLAN. 'Y^10vm
1
-
..r
-4An•
' E 26fiB:?A
'/ '
(

/
E 2
69
517 e ` am j ?
42
- -?
3.
FOR BUILDING FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS.
S
T i+ {17
15 INV EL 7.00_: -
INV 17.0
N 3832200
3• SEE SHEET C-507. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
'SIT 14 -V
'?
,/-
--
:
--' s `%?'\
j
f
/'
c
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
--
--
r?
` - --
-
--
_
CSP- RCN 4. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY

1517r dE`. ram.
•
r IT = -

plan
?a« =2'11=60

-`
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.

517 ` .E 26995}27
INV El/17.01
Z\
mN A

S /
/
- " /

.
1W CSP ARCH
53 z
38
TRY
S. SEE SHEET C-503. STATIONARY INFAN
TARGET EMPLACEMENT
FOR DOUBLE SIT
-6-am-
\i

`?' _
` 535W}81fM / I
CSP-ARCM
= N.98394
54
.94
= ,f j _.?:
6
2 9 .
EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.

-
--?-?
-
i.+ I
s.t ra
.rr .
N 38Jj154.86 . - - i
w?
0£269864:3}'-s .- o = ny .r -
wa ELf -
NV
_
_
? MEDVAGtAN6,IN

CENTERLINE EL AREA

17
68
6. SEE SHEET C-506. FIRING BERM. FOR _

IT
1* • \ - f
:
i ,IN1f'EL 16.98 =/
4 ,. : _ {
' '
' CSP- CH
533W 38 tlg
N 9832161 584 _
C
3 f=i
`
==Ti . WiADING AT FIRING BERM.
_
wm

r
?
SIT 3
N
,
• \
I
,33MM /381W CSI-ARCH/ J f i f
=N 7872Ti75.71
i E 269971. t t f
269982
iT
_
-_f INV E =16.97_
! / 7. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS
DETAILS. FOR GRADING AT MEDVAC
LANDING AREA.
?

?m
p
+
y
:
? `Tt
,a 4M14:EL 16.97--• ro y? •11C- a •c•/
I
f N37832?53B6W SPAR 8• $E SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS
E
FOR GRADING AT B
DING
I Q
i Z
`
-
+ SIT 2 / j f ,O fT J _
E a699
?NV EL77-94

+ OX
TE:I .
U
L
EXTEROR.

q w

Z Z
SiTi
\ "' - R• `i -
=
`
/ -
/
f ?
1
f SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS
DETAILS. FOR EXIT DITCH GRADING.
S ¢ w
J
7
a
fJ?
EX ET 4)47CIF++CENTSR?NE
N 3832140.7,5 1T81A6{PcRCMk:r aa.
.. as5d
- N'7 3.17 _
_
533W 381W 5P-A x {
l
1 10. SEE SHEET 0-512. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS. :0 J
p w
p
y
E 269846.00+!}
EL 76.94 02
: - 16.94 N 38y2?J0.90 .

E 27 078.40=- -
6
`16.95 f FOR TARGET SERVICE ROAD TURNAROUND.

SEE SHEET C-514. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.
+<R
Y j
a
= f 2
44 CSP-ARCH
f =- N33 3MM 2112
3g - f J >
*/ -
FOR 820 BERM LOCATION AND GRADING o ¢
1 r -
.
_
r - E:269933.74 /
j =--°R\
ram
T
0
•%-n
? .,
413832117815 CS X
i 38tW CSP-ARDA
_ ' MEOVAC LANDING AREA
j DETAILS. cA 4 Q
f
.. _ /
Y
4HV EL
8
t35
P
-
4
_ g,27 18 ?
27 /INV E 6.93
26 9603 CENTERLINE EL 17.68
i
z cn p
03
Q
533W x 3B1Mifi CSP-AR-
; J., )W z B1W CS
ARC
= 7
i
V L N 3872100 a N
E 269914.36
?.
INV EL 16.92
F IRI
6

INV?EL 16.47

f
_
a
0-
i
aw
INE

CX
' 532W
`'W t
N 38320825
88

.F. = ya> / -
/ ' i JP > / J qp?y? r

_? - I 2 F'

1W
781W CSP-ARCH

N

1
z

~

p
9t
4
i
EL 16.1!9
yi1
533W 381 W RCM 1
K / T` t

933MM Bli1W CV -ARCH
N 7832068 94 / '
f _
/ a _
533W X 387 W ASP-ARCN?=
N 3832089.30 = =
' -
N 78}2 21
E 269990 1
I EL 16 - 1
n 9
L i

- a
7
f
N 3832070.21 w • ?` -
79 },
E 269891. /?
E 269960 63 y/ - - - f
IAv ELT6
b2' i - E E$2b9983.60
/ %g 1T#V ,
TGF90

INV El 16.88
? /
EXIT DIT If CENTE INE f _. -
573W.x 361W CSP-AflCNo
33W
4_x ?iW CSP-ARCH N 38 076.93 f
?- '

n
j 1
£ `
573W x 381W LSP-
N 7872061.70 3872061.12 f / --
E 269¢96.81
/-
=
ti -=17 3832675.57 2E 967.569 /
_ E 28.59 J ITIV L 16'89 / 0 20 40 60m
E 269896.551.
INV EL 76.88 _ f
f
{
EL fb. 89 _- -? -= INV 16.8M' 1:600

f3-2-
C
B
A
I C D
- 1 2 1 1 4 1 5
1 1 2 1 3 1 4 I 5
t
i

SIT 41
SIT
4 SIT zr KEY PLAN

•can.
•cm. .can ?
n k
.cam. •caw. .<«u•
? a
»
caw a <aa cam
< r a c

?
\r
, ?' ` C-14 -146 6
_
_ SIT 33 ? N 32300 9
K
??-? 517 2 C-14 -14A C-14
.. «,e. .. a,r. .ran. •. an. •r «n. ??
.r «.x. ... L .. an. y
an. .wn. ..a». .. a». oF''4 .. a,.. 7
`. C-14 C-14 C-14 C-13
S331M B11M CSP-ARCH `
533W 381W CSP-
N 3072279
67 RCN n N 383229
E 269647 41
tl ` -138 C-13 C-13 C-17
.
E 269650.18
INV EL 17
32 \ INV EL i
/ .33 1
r j
.
.ra». •rwu. rw. .ran.
•. «es. ,e ?? •r wn. `1 .. an S3 SIT 2
W X. I811M CSP'A8.O1L L-174 C-13
w

EXIT DITCH C N
NTERLINE E 832230.22
69722.14
C-17
N 7832256.84

2fi9631. D7
E
INV EL 17.29
SIT 32 IN
EL 17.21 SIT 24

`
222...8
pg
a
3

.ran.
"«..
..w<. n. 'Srf'?
..a». . ? •.an. .. an. ..a».
.. an.
.ca
?i; i €
_'' ` 1 ` t!
`
533MM 381W CSP-ARCH

£ N 3832214.68 SIT 23
"
-''
/?
` •. am. •Jxfar4E72iiD9§an. .. an. n. .. an• •r n.
'
; , f ?I %
SJJW 381W CS -ARCH NOTES:

/ SIT 22 N 3832193.01
E 269821.45
1. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
F
R R
T

!f
f IT DITCH CENTE INE
!( INV El 17.06
w
/ OAD SEC
SECTIONS.
O
IONS.
r
l S "_ 4! 38722¢6. Y95
l
5¢ -
i E 2696E5 STONE CHECK DAY
I
CONTROL POINT
C 1 \
2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY ?
.
_
j t EL 1 .20' ra»
ra»
N 3872233.03 r.
rar
eon
_ rar r TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT

a E 269618.79
EL 17.79
7220 EMPLACEMENT DETAILS. .,. r?
"
l
/
f 3. SEE SHEET C-503. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR DOUBLE SIT
a.
t- F
' _
G
517 21 EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
1 i EXIT DITCH CENTERLINE
N 7832191 T9 ?
ra
»•53 4M8(CSP41R8N
3
2180.25% a.r
4. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS

C !! //

f E 269710.41
El 17.15 - -
69827.9T
ER
/' INV E? .O6
_

` DETAILS. FOR EXIT DITCH GRADING.

5. EEE SHEET
FORPOWERCENTER
FOR POWERCENTER
EMPLACEMENT

'^

EXIT DITCH C ERI IN
N 7872190.47
EXIF`DIiEN'CENTERLI
J1E
r
''
12 .
.
EMPLACEMENT DETAILS. -
E 269710.42

EL 17.10 _ __ ?
_ N 3216!"
JJBB ..33
??
fJ
269807R 7 ' r
E'
?
`f
" •

6. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.
fF J
-
EL 17.QS J
,
' FOR TARGET SERVICE ROAD TURNAROUND
"
%STONE CHECK DAM
I J f'
- CONTROL POINT/ i
f
-
T'
i LAYOUT.
a.a ?n
I

i N 3832154.2y / f =
E,Y69T99. L4 %
5( 17.15_= El (IT
CENTE_RI.INE
DIT
" I
SI I. SEE SHEET C-516. EROSION AND SEOILENT
CONTROL. FOR STONE CHECK DAM DETAILS. _

2

1
.82
7832
/
E 269 1.SO
EL" .81

`
$
Lu
Z w

1 TAP SERVI Ce R0 D W Q w Q

r ' a
I % / R L p

/ r EXIT DITCH CE
N 3832172.60 E
LINE
`
' y O J

M1 W
/ " /
I
ll E 269820.21
EL 16
87 Y> y E 2
i "
F
'
. =
u
/ - I - STONE CHE
I CONTROL
N 383213! CK DAM
INT
'r«
.75 t} L
.1
Q W
f N O
/// E 269823. 7
i
IM m Z
z
e El 17.10 N 3832100 o U1

/ FLANT PINE EES
-
I}
a

fl?

J °v \
I
0 20 40 60m
/ /
?I 1:600

37 .2M
?
C-133
C
B
A
1 1 2 1 3 4 5
1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5
F
F

i
531 W % 381
N 7872320.7

E 269247.49 CSP-ARCH
7 _ ?gAO'?

1T>E
TARGET SERVICE ROAD 5

N
KEY PLAN
INV EL 17.5 , r+'? .s c.e. •E S.. ...>. .<w.
TARGET SERVIC ROAD 10
SIT 4
C-14 -146 E
gARRleR 1-1 N 38327
EOL3A OOV' CC STONE CHECK DAM
E%IT OITCN CENTERLINE
N 7832707.57
4 +-144 C-14
C-1
CONTROL POINT
N 3832278.01 E 269482.11 .. an.
EL 17.45 C-14 C-t4 C-14 C-139 -125
E 269732.23 STONE CHECK DAM
-126
EL 18.08 CONTROL POINT
N 7832284.72 -138 C-13 C-13 C-13

TARGET SERVILE ROAD T E 269478.87 -
EL 17.55 C-127
-133C-13
? C-12
EKIT DITCH CENTERLINE -a
X C-tJ -17 C-12 F

77W 78

CSP-ARCH
EXIT DITCH CENTERLINE
I
W
3932260.29
E 269475.29
"
El 17.37
;
Sy
S
p
<
Of
g
`
97
N 7832302.
E 269244.5 2
N 7832702.11 i
?S F E3
F
INV EL 17. 7 E 269244.01 E%IT DITCH CENTERLINE 1 ?!
EL 17.53 N 3872258.16
E 269405.12
EL 17.44 ;
!
T

1 NOTES:
1. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDE>ALK
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.

J 2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
m
j
I TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT --
-

'N 783220 EMPLACEMENT DETAILS. ?
,i .
g1pG
3. SEE SLEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS
DETAILS. FOR E%IT DITCH GRADING.
i JF

F
'

AILS.
4. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS
ODETET
FOR TARGET SERVICE E ROAD ROAD TURNAR UND
{^^--..,? %
9 t f' LAYOUT.
SEE SHEET C-516
I
EROSION ANO SEDIMENT SEE a+N
.
.
CONROL. FOR STONE CHECK DAM DETAILS.
LS.

8 2

f ? qg
? w
¢
f r g J
a
.z z w

Yj a
Z a
i

U Q w
PLANTE D PINE TEES Q z
N 3832101
p 01
N
Q 0- z
a u °

[

1= = a
rc
u
N e b f ¢
E

0 20 40 60.
1:600 E!S

.
s
?
4
C 13
D
C
B
A
1 z I 4 I HJ
1 2 1 3 1 4 I 5
E
rA

(
- 533W 381W CSP-ARCH
N 3632594.99 [EY KW N
- i 1 E 269754.16
\ SIT $9 INV EL 17.59 C-14 -146
SIT 58 PLANTED -INE TREES

1 C-14 C-144 C-14
?
1 533W x 3 1W CSP-ARCH C-14 C-14 C-14 C-179 -12
SIT 57 N 3872560 99 -126
1 E 269749. 2
-178 C-13 C-13
INV EL 17
SIT 56 ? 60 -12
•<•.a. •c,.u. •c,.n. .c...+. .<..«. c.... C-17 -137 C-13

A 1 C-12
C-171 -13 C-12
i
\ 5
,
SIT 15 9
?S E p3
1
1

1 N 7872500 NOTES:
1 1. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDENALK
1
v
e
<.
e
c.
«
«.
.c.
r. .<
n. c.
v SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
•c,.r. .c..
. .
.
.
.
. .
.
. _? . 2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY

- TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
' s v - = - EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
11 533MM 381W CSP-ARCH - 3. SEE SHEET C-503. STATIONARY INFANTRY
.
5 3832447+j. .c?
n.
- TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR DOUBLE SIT
. .c
.<,.a. .<,.,.. •<•.r. .c.. .
383 EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
1 INV EL 17.56 4. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.

533W 3B1W CSP-ARCM FOR TARGET SERVICE ROAD TURNAROUND
LAYOUT.
N 3872441.92
.c,.a. •<•m. E 269784.60 c+.n.
•<e«. •cqs. " .as 5. SEE SHEET C-504. MOVING INFANTRY TARGET

INV El 17.57 ?? EMPLACEMENT. FOR MOVING INFANTRY -
TARGET EMPLACEMENT DETAILS. -
?•
I
?y
? F
BP
.
r
.. ,.a ts• •c,++• .SI,
..w.
s .u.
-
,7,
W \7
.??1 ? 9
W
1\ Z

z W a
SI 37
N 3872400 =? -3 w
¢
m
l N 3832370.47 Y> a
i s z

IT`36
?
? E 269865.76
JNV EL 1 .:3?
Q
( {
O .. w
=
¢
,<
.v. .ca... .<.
.
.c.. .c..... .<...•.
` . a.
. € u ¢

tJfJ?' w
1
je..

.
<.r. .<.u. .<ux. c.w.. °a• W ?{ 38]SP,?iSV

C
.cas.
AIW
j

`
¢
¢ ¢
2
<
N
E 713
9856.66 `
?_ 0 O
1 u 0
MIT 1 1 EL 17.39
'; ? r Z O
SIT 30 iy ^ i N B 7
` k" I PLANTED P HE TREES 9
r S z
car. <w.. <au. cw. aq. .car. ae.
< r. of
1 a«.
1
SIT 29 ; o
\/
s
$
.Sar 35 .<we. <a+. .caw. .< ?'-<a... -_SIT 28.c.n. 1 .<as.
•< \
.<an. •Itt'., ; s'E. 0 20 40 60m
i _ - 1:600

r 744
C- 135
D
C
B
A
1 1 2 1 j 4 4 5
1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5

J / KEY PLAN
?
.<d
V
,n<1a .a e' •, n. .<.a. .<a...
<au. .<ar. .<.a. .<,m.?/
r.
/
<?1'f .<,.r. .<,... .<,..,. <.w.
73
c
I PLANTED PINE TREES C-14 -146 p
6
<<s?
'• .d e4
ar. .<aa. •<ar.
i/ t\.,
< /
•<o-u. .sar. .<. ?•.r. .<..».
/' S'c r2. .c.... .s..«. -<,.n. .<.». c-14 C-144 C-14
C-14 C-14 C-14 C-179
-125
' /
?
J
T / -126
s
" SIT 81 PC 2 -138 C-13 C-1J

? SIT 71
•
+ -12
<-ar.
t <a«. c.w. ..e. s
.v. 133 C-iJ

SIT 70 1-12
C-131 -1J C-72

Z
SIT 69

ar. ...... <a
51T 6B '
'I
N NOTES:

' 31

MIT 2
'
c
SIT 52
1. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
<an ear. •e,«. •car. .ca.. /
? n. a
a'
r
•<a can. .c,a. •s+.v.
•e,. .r• "'•«• "`•n• "'10' SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.

•SIT 82 / 2• SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
SIT 613 T 1 EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.

/ 3. SEE SWEET C-505. PONERCENTER
EMPLACEMENT
FOR POMERCENTER wr
.cwr. •<a«. •<.... •c,.r. A •<STT6 cav. .<
. •<>n. .c,.u. •<+.».
a« ,.n. < 8i' _ ?. .? .<•.n. .<+.n. .
EMPLACEMENT DETAILS
}
- 4. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS. -
FOR MANEUVER TRAIL CUL-DE-SAC LAYOUT.
?/ Tc 5. SEE SHEET C-504. MOVING INFANTRY TARGET
EMPLACEMENT
FOR MOVING INFANTRY .ra se
•ca«. •eaa. c,.... .s 9! .c+.m. •<ar. .can. .car. -c..n...». .5113 49c,.r. .<„a. <..... .<,.a. .
TARGET EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
/ SIT 65 _<(4 SIT 48
T,
/
, -?
•ea«. •< :
-c Mr. .c s. / .sav. .ca.. -sar. -e a«.
? .... .c..s• .s..». .<,. •<,.u. .<..r. -s,.n. ?•
Sii 64 ; ?
U
Z

SIT 47 ?-_- d z z z
•<ar. .cav. s . .ca». <s.«. .?. .<>.. ,•«. '•• •
'
' an
. 1
46
YI
}
O z

/ `-- `.
1
_r< i.3;4. ,
J
v
' I ??•-+ a
.<... •<ae. .cw.. ?<
?.
f a .<,.m. .'? c..r.
.
? U o
?
51T 62
381MM CSP
ARCH
/ SIT L?j
Q
Z
=
537MM
"'f6y6, N 3832344.56 /
sly a y m a

i A E 269496 34
w7y INV EL 17.51
-S 4
¢
2
.s •ca .<ae
-c..«. •e ?:
<a? ar, .c..». -<,.n. •e •.». •cwr. .sa.. .<,.». .<,.a. _
? %?-
\
'
SIT 61 \ ? ? ? a
y .
•
F u
N e a
' \ L E
•cao.
/ ?' y
..w
?\ ? c . •c,.r.51T 43•<1.11. .s+.m. •<aa. •<an. .<
4<a a
? =
?
? ` / /
TARGET SERVICE ROAD
1r F-?"'`-?
\` SIT 42 P;.ANFEO PINE TREES
_ \ /
-` 781w CSP-ARC
x
MA
573

.<wa. 23313.70
383
N
n E 269.79&-79 cw < ?.
a •cav•
' .cw -<w. •<av. .ca..
`. .cm,. .cav. .sw... .ca swr. 0 20 40 60m
INV EE
Ir 49 ?
1:600 mommomia

rxr
?C-136
D
C
B
A
1 1 2 1 4 5
1 I 1 3 1 4 5
€

N
z b: 5 \ KEY PLAN
,yxu -_r...ED PINE TREES C-74 -746 i
f ?
I. a. ? ?«. / .r v
_ r. i ? f` /f iq S ?
11M, 17'r
• J gym` SI T
116 I
.r «n. .ra«. sw«. a / .raa.
r
.r ax451T 95 ,rwa. •<wm• C-1q C-1q4 C-14
I
,• f3
SIT 9 C-14 C-14 C-14
C-139
-125
-126
t
" j? J /
A
_

/ ,?+ / _ !3 L I

-138 C-13 C-13

`
7
1
"".
-
?
.r w
•
. C-127
.r
,my an• ra_u
f• o _
••715 ,?' .r ao. .r wr. .wr.
.. aa. .r wa. an.
s.
<a,.•
- C-174 -137 C-13
C-131 -13 C-12 r
G
'
=
"
-. w... .. wn. .. aa. ..
,
ra "
..r. i
" .. aa. .ram. - .[a.. .rw«. •<wn. .cwr. .<«..

? f r / B
(' /
?
? I
'
??§
.rwr. .rao. .r au. is
•r as ? .. :.4 f`
..a ! L
a.l
w
•?fi?• •<wm. ,
, .[am• •<ar. <aar• •<tn• .caa. •[a4. /

1 N 38 0 NOTES:
2 SIT 93 1. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK

.raa
e
.
a
.. wn. •rwn. el.1 LZ.''_' - -
.. n« «a. .<aa. .<aa. -<a«.
.[o-«. .[ar. .<
< SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
-
.
.
an. .
a
. T 82 2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
m
SIT 111 TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
"_ 51T 92 EMPLACEMENT DETAILS. crnin. w.i
SIT 110 3. SEE SHEET
FOR TARGETC SERVICE MISCELLANEOUS
ROADL TURNAROUND AILS.
.ewn. •<an. .<wm. .[o-n. •4a? .
_ a«
_" : q .<ae. .<aa. <a.n. .<ax. .<aw. .ea«. o. LAYOUT.
"
" SIT 91

/}
a /

SIT
81 w
.ca... .<a L <sn" t q_ 90
«?• •<a.r. .caw. •<n«. .[ax. .<aa. < ? •c?.m.

.?j4 t"ns. •caro - zi« ew«. .
•ea.r =
' U

1 "
•Y a«. .ran• .<«n. -<au.
_ ' n. .[wr. .c«n. 8 z ' J
u
N 3832400 % N
a 4

=
is .... <

}
y
a W o
?j ?

f
._
' S
''d 7 80 a N m a
f
r -
T J d N
1 [ \ .<a... •<wn. 3` wn. .<wm .. aa. .<a«. a ¢ ?
wu .Z.,
I
w
J
It

[
< p 3:
T
/ TARGET SERVICE ROAD 6

4b l1 ' ?

[ 20 40 60.
- -' 1:600

r
-C-13s7
D
C
B
A

1 1 2 3 4 5
E
e

>;'

T ERVIC OAU 8

\ w
\ /

SIT
160

/

. 6 . T j
/J II
T
f lcor PLAN N

C-11 -116

C-i t C-111 L-11
C-11 C-11 C-11 C-139 -12
-126

C-13 C-13 C-13
c
\
•
l
x -127 i
wx tl
_ ..
'_
' x.
}
•
+ SIT" 1 C-131 -133 C-13
C-12
C-17 -73 C-12

?w

N •3832500 NOTES:
u sn.
1. SEE SHE T C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
SE
\
\\\ .? 2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FUR SIT
\\\ _ EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
3. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS 0ET41L5.
FOR SERVICE ROAD TURNaflOUND
LAYOUT.
UT.

n.. -
\s\
\ ?Q u
Y . O
W
a ? z

,l
N 3e3z/o0 .5 w
? J w
N a v

'
" 7J/ f a u
U
O

f
. j / U

J

a
a
E N
to
O
N
¢ ¢
w
O
z
Q
O
z
a
?ETL
i ??
`
N
e a
4
go:
a

ti 0 20 /0 60m
1:600

.2w
?C 138
D
C
B
A

1 q 1 4 5
E
E

w SIT •t?o• .r a:. 1 rev.
1 / i
.'' %
/? f f I T I

j ( ? ? _ I 1
?
' 1

a
•
KEY RAM N
11
S9YtoB « ? / J ?? /' i i j ' i
' ;
?
? I
?
M1 L-14 -146
c-144
'

.a r I
i I ? i
? i
; , o-u
c-u
C-14 C-14 C-14 -12
-126
-138 C-13 C-13 C-13
<.. .r •rt
a l
i j ( 3 .' i ! -727

f rt _ X ?1 /
1
f I ?n i i
f?
' C-134 -133 C-13
C-1 C-12
3 -13 C-12

r 1
1
/ •' f{
ff
?c `
f
i }
/
N 3872800 E
?T3 ?3

° P'1 °'_ _/

C?"}? •
F __ ? `_•,'

C TERM
E%T
' '

E:_? NOTES: 501.
1. SE SECTSHEEIONST C-
FOR ROAD SECTIONSIDEIrALK
__k
/

y 6
_
-\N 3B 32156.14
_ 26'750b.4,1
EL 7.29
2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT m
_ SITf89 _
/' _
f EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
rw. >.: •.i"a.

f •rwr<. •.o-«. 3. SEE SHEET 0-512. MISCELLaNEaU5
DETAILS. FOR EXIT OITCN GRADING.
s f/
' STONE CHECK DAY
CONTROL POINT
- i -
j N 3832734.97
E 269742.93 4. SEE SHEET C-572. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.
FOR MANEUVER TRAIL CUL-DE-SAC LAYOUT.
EL 16.43
SEE SHEET C-512
MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS
5
«a
r .<ar. .r ea. .ran. ..a«. .. an. •re.s. .
.
.
FOR TARGET SERVICE ROAD TURNAROUND
SIT 88 LAYOUT. -
EXIT DITCH CENTERLINE
N 3832705.36 6. SEE SHEET C-516. EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL. FOR STONE CHECK DAY DETAILS. -
533M1 X 381 M1 CSP -ARCH
.<a«. •A1J8326T7.82ar.. .e E 269732.43
•eo-«. .< __EL 17.36
E 269709.57
INV EL 77.40 ss
N 3832700 v

Y w
w
..o-«. .. ea<. .<o-n. <o-u. /
a /' •<eo. .<en. •<o-«. ? t-_'_`•.? ? g

G
Q Z
? W
J
'
w d

<er.
S'
9 ?? a

Z Q

' SIT 78 F
/
'
SI
<?.,.. .<,...
Z 7T o N

SIT 76 w
<.... .<ea. IN. '
z
/
SITTS A
??
M TARGET SERVICE ROAD 5 {.
n
\
7 ?
f
1 !
.70.«. .<.m. .<.«
•e•.n. 51 <.n
9
.<•.n. .<..«
/I n 0 20 40 60x11
` /
t' Y N 3832600 1:600

•2r
?C-139
D
C
B
A

1 7 1 1 4 5
E
E

%
SIT 178 'SIT'13S /1! ?' KEY PLAN N

' SIT 137 C-14 C-144
C-14
" f / / C-14 C-t4 C-179 -125

-
SIT 1
5

_
-_ "

///// STT 106
-
'f -
` SIT 107

" -126

-138 C-17 C-17 C-17
.. « ..... ...'.r.°a`
`a
Cd'-SIT?Sb's'"'_' '
-?.r
?
_.` ..F"•Y :- « -1z7 j
' -s
%
-
?- -
1
G l
?? C-134 -133C-17
C-12 ¦
r SIT
134
I
_ {
/' ! f 77 -` C-171 -13 C-12 3
?
Jj l .r .? <EEpp
OS E y3
7832000
"
f3' S I T 132 11 i
5
5
?

SIT 133 i... /.

J./f__ ..{_' ." ..i m." f ,

f•.. w..j- fi'
"_ .. a».

SIT
/ {
_
=
' f =
SIT 10
=
= NOTES:

' '
..a • f ?
g /,
},<, ,j
a 1. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND

• .
j _

?
$iT 103

' SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
2. SEE SHEET 0-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
/
PC 1 F

/fJ f -
J SIT=102 _ TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.

Zlfik-I6-

m -. «p•
79
• S T 429
' - n. :--" •. ae - -. qrs..

.u. j .-/ - ":

..
. - - -.f
"_"< - = f
j =

j
/
•« 3. SEE SHEET C-505. PWERCENTER

EMPLACE LENT. FOR POYERCENTER
-
_ ?` - "- l f "
? EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.

-
f 4. SEE SHEET C-504. MOVING INFANTRY TARGET
SIT 120
I "
1 EIPL ACEMENT. FOR MOVING INFANTRY
T
T
T
T

Vf _
/
?
"_f
?«
EMPLACEMEN
AILS.
ARGE
DE -

^
f
T 126 v - - _ -
__ - mr
nr-

i

F '
?rp SIT 87

it
•?
1 f
/
Z -Z J N 3832700

\ g z
a j

' 1015(7'06
=i
LO
= z

V(?
.. «n. ..an. `' "P10 SIT 98'0.m•
t f
[SIT
; } «."..+. }! .. ax.
Jf = = _
Y j
:' ?

.. •%?/'.ee.». .<w. .<ax. •e.x.
J.

.esu.

Yo
II{
U J
w a
= U
u
W

o
j q
T 16

.. ax. ..« ...w. .. «.. .. «..
i ? •. rt` ••dw. .<am. -.«x. ?/
:E
r. .. .<«m. .<a«. •<e...
.<?.». J
a
¢t] a
N
z

' SIT 85 w

EO YI NE TkE'cS ?
(
SIT 97 /
f +i5
S :r .. s... .<am% ea...

.c.r. .<«n. .eam• TARGET SERVICE ROAD

6 .<..a
N 1- z
J u
°o
0 20 40 60.
N 3832600 y.600

x3ML
c- 40
D
C
B
A
1 1 2 1 3 1 4 I 5 _
1 '2 I
E

.ryre. .. an. .ra•r. `\ .cw. .<aw. .rwn. .eay. .. wr. .ran. ./ ?• re. _ - ------,-- KEY PI-Am N
4N 0 PINE-?.E < 17 1W CSP-ARCH
32962 49 SIT 164
E 69080• 4 1

16 66 /
1
E 533W x 381 W CSP-ARCH
/ ?? -- -
C-14 -146
6
6

.r pre. •rw .4
`
. d
raw. •r •r ura .rn
a
e N 3832871.95
.<am. .ram. .ran.
•raw
E 269088xG0
fi
fi5 rr nre.
j,` c'•

f
C-74 C-144 C-14

-

3W % 3 CSP-ARCH
- N 1872851 T2 1
6
18
7 INV
1
.
EL
533W x 381W CSP-ARCH
"
"
f

C-14 C-14 C-139 -125
' - - 6967
- Y
IN
J1
,E/
?k 1 IN 269091 3832861.23

EL .66 /"
`

-
.»_
«
-_____
----
j '_
_
126
-130 C-13 C-13 L-17
"s - •r•r ww. .ra .ran. .rac .ca•,. .<aw. .
.r
,.
.r
-ran

<G `

\
" ?_`?3 - C-134 -137 C-1J
C-12
J ? 1\ , ?, SIT 1:54 -13 C-12 ?
? ((?
.a .Y ar .. .. a.. ...m. .<an. arey .<nm. .<ar. ?.. am. ..a .. q. .. w. -. - u 9?
f - R 9O g
'. / * 1 83
\ O1T 163
s
" _.r<
r
•r. .ra .caw. •cw:..
? a./ <a <am
r / .a.
a
57JW
\ t, N 3832772. 78196W CSP-ARCM

E 269125.89

?

NOTES:
_ - -

6 ,->?nn. .r>s. .r a,e. •can. •<wn. .can. 1\ •cam. INV 4.16•B9 •<an.

" .<w. •r an. rwu
u. - -
y 1. SEE SHEET C
SEC -501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
T IONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
\
-
? ••
r3
r 2. SEE SHEET
INFANTRY
T GET WLA
EENT, FOR SIT
\
SIT 153
"

} T DETAILS.
EMPLACEE
OE _
/
.. e.».?T .o. .r wn. •eaa. •<w,. •<nn.
.. a :1 .
<am. •cnn. •cae. •ram. .are.
and wx
533W 381W CS
-ARC

/
p .cwm. an /
•<u. •<wm. .ea•,. .<wn. .< P
N 7872752.91
E 269122.44
-can. .can.
INV'Et"76.93 j -
T 127
-

/ S T 162 \
, ` - --
'/"
-
/ rx. •c.m. -caw. .r w«. .cn«. •<aw. w. . ,. .. an. .. an.
-can. .rav. .. a•r. _

n. .. an
..w{ _
'v+'kxt t Ar .ran. .. ur. i -
/L.c". <.
„124 Sl ?/2 p
Z
¢
j /
5
j
t
f ?/" N W a
i ff s
a i Y f
', .r

f,.
r • f anC ` tt"_'?,??..

, '
'
? 4S? SIT 122 SIT 121 F •? / o

J =

O ¢
O
?.-
wa
as /
da
,• r a
a
n. \ } ana
¢ a N
¢ v
Z
-ANT INE TR 5
5
N 381Ai1 CSP RCN
832619:97 1 /
.-• w
¢

.4L . I
n/'
wr

f• fSIL 157 _ g
- 69175:09 ! 1
EL y.26 /
?.a e
533 381 W C 4RCx
N 265.72
.. £II ty 8.
J6 '

IT 120 ALAN ED PINE TREES
N

a a f
?
go: v
i _
8 / / _
ao
:-
- 7
`•{ 1.27`
:
f
'
.ram. .r
.. m
_ .w. .r ? m. ...m -
.. .x a.
-
w. - ..
e.nf .
- -
• 0 20 40 60m
SIT
118
N 3632600 1:600

.zw
?C 141
D
C
B
A

1 ? q , 4 , S
E
i

a
IT , - cEr vLAx N
C-1t -,I6
C-lt C-, ??L-1I

-126
-138 C-,3 C-,3 C-1
?
-12
RAE= \\\ /? C-, 7, -13 C-12 C-12
N 3e32e00

a s

` ? •/ - «.

\ an ?? NOTES:
,. SEE SHEET C-SO1. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.

r
2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT

-
--
-
17-
f EMPLACEMENT DETAILS. ART. .
FrtYiF.
RT
, 3. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.
FOR TARGET SERVILE ROAD TURNAROUND
LAYOUT.
rr

j y'/ - .• w ` N 383270 m u
f` 1\\
100
]it

N
u

J ?

°
18 M
?
- ti
a \
i
0 20 40 60.
3832 00 1;60D
m
.aw
Q- 142
D
C
B
A

7 q 4 1 :1
E
E

_ f
\- STONE
CHECK
DAY
E NTEflL INE
DC
N 383710

"O
E9
aw. .. «a.
.`
?6 CONTROL POINT
N
7877141.
23
f
E 269568.75
EL 16.60 --- - -------- -
,= .:--"
--=I _
-.

- -------

14 146

f

6
FEC
.54
_;, ..i. 1?? IT DITCH CENTERLINE
367715'5.96 f - --
-- --- ----------------
EE

53
MM 1M/ CSP-ARCH 269575.55
16.45 _'
-
_
C-5'4 C-14 C-5'4 C-139 -125

n' 8331 .82
.a
t
" °"'
R
XI7 DITCH CENTERLINE _______

_
E
IN T
69
/
16
54 t N 787]108.95 -178 C-17 C-13 C-13
. E 269577,51
EL 16.45
C-127
i

- 1 - , C-17 -5'37 C-13

•t«a. •5'«a.
/
.5'«w. •t .<«n. -t .tan. s?
a
j

-.. -- ? _ C-12

C 171 17 C_12
t.
W
i
/
SIT 159 w
-- ?S E 3
0

AND
? 3 1
•t«w. r! ..«w. .5'a ... ,e ; ..t _ _
. .._.
CSP-ARCH
E=269562.29 ' - s - "
/ INVEC 16.54
NOTES:

ti
` 1 - STONE CHECx DAY 1. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK

_-__------- -t
--------- _»_?_??___ CONTROL POINT
----X-38}3037"•86-------
- " SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.

t E 269607.46
EL 16.79 - -
-
2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
51T 158 - y , TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
.5'«w. .tan. .eaa. •ta,e. --s L.ts --- "? •tan. 1 <ar.
E- EMPLACEMENT DETAILS. r.r
-
4 ?
_?___________._.??_??_
,- _- - _- _
3. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS
DETAILS. FOR EXIT DITCH GRADING.
a?

a m n a _??____ -? 4. SEE SHEET C-516. EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL. FOR STONE CHECK DAM DETAILS.

N 7837000
-

STONE CHECK DAM m U

?
'
a
N 3832959
58
- Z

-•aa. .. a...
..a.5'. •• j
-. n. L .•Sf.L1 .
_
• as • _ -
269969Q-50,
_E
Y w
w
E Z
2

51r 14 = Z ? w 0.
.«a. .raa. •. «n. t S4T.646
y yy
1' n. ±.
7 .`«a' '•a0ia 1. STONE CHE _ _
DAM
- s. .. O
' N
Y J
Z w a W
0 P
R INT ^ a
2:

E 269664.1
"`
? U
c=i
EL 17.08__ Y ? w ?
a
=
? __/ a o
• a a

••aw.
3
IT •145 't as. _

••«u• ••>'•. •• E
XIT 01

H
' CENTERLINE ANTED R[HE TfiEES

=aj

D m a
2

/ N
38329
E 26966 91
21
a
¢ aL ?
Z
/ EL 16.8
?

a U
= '-'

?
SIT 1
:MARCH
53a3°M x 381MM
331
1
95'.94
N

W CSP-ARCH
8

F Z m

/

'

j 63
2
E \.,,.
X
.
6986
EL 16.96 E 2696
I
NV
INV EL
• • ?
}

65.03

16.96
N 3832900

N

E

8

J

D C.,

?

S 530 o a. °o .« a?? X 1 f

? 0 20 40 60m
?? SPT 139 . - 1x600

47 a2M
?
C-143
D
C
B
A
1 1 2 1 1 1 4 '
1 1 2 1 3 1 4 7 5
t
6

yy
F=" 5? I 1 r B /'
4 6
C-7
-146

?.I
o r SIT 176 .
? C-14 c-14 c-7+4 -77s ,zfi -tzs

r ?1 ;,
I /
-778 C-17 C-17 C-73
I N 3833100 -127 f
i

1 i

d
¢

.. d el

.. a,,. .. ar.
n
a. a
.

.. a.. .. am. .c.n. C-134 -137 C-73
C-12
C-171 -13 C-12

w
8
.
n.
.. I .. m. .
a
.
.
qui ll
E l
l

j

I SI T. 2?5 I •. A

..

1 I

•.
{.. a,

+

, jJ

m..a»....
... ...»

a..«...
•c
v N
OTES:

I `
- i
?
?
?cy y+
/
IT 167
y
/ 1. SEE E SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
,-
i
\ . '
?
I xAF' -! I -£ / / 2. 5EE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY

+ I
/
'
' TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
-
-
-
! •. ,.? L
.
dm,,
r
m• i
.. dm. !
•r?m.
1 ! n. .ram. .cam. .can. •cam ra.. ewm.
'
.m / EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
.
GRiaF1.
R

I
}
l
.
?- i j
!
- 3. SEE SHEET C-505. POVERCENTER
EMPLACEMENT
FOR POMERCENTER
s~
{1
!f' '
I I 1 i .
EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
i 1 451
F
.. a.. ?I:,
.dm I ». .r... .. au. .. am? .ra•
. m. .. am. .aH. ...,..
1 ?

I i
a 'i _
1 .ra». ...W. ?? d . r
. SIT 4B8• .4a ,.. -_ ---
.ra... -?.- ..> - .. w
S :T 157

z

- - -
/,
- - Y
? z ?
z W J
a
/ -
. .r an.PC
•a.,. /. eau. .. av. .rao.
.. anPLA TEO• TREES •••? .ram. .. au. ..«..
£ .. a.. - y1' = Q 2

--_-----'--- __`-----'-'-
J' '--------- ---------------'------- _____?_?

'^ O = U

U Q

?-
. ?_
SIT 156
,nf: ?.. .!Sc.e
a W
E N O
--SIT 16`x.... .a,a _ .raw. 71 .ean. .. w. ? a 2 W m 2

2
..... .. w.. ..m. .a.. ... «n % .. .raw. .a.. am. - ? N e a ? ?
URGE SERVICE ROAD 8
/ -
'
'
`
"
"
` /-
.. w.. .. am. ..... c .. w. .ram.-
\? - . .. c r.
.r
.. am. ., «w. .a,,. .. a-?
?
?
+M-•
a .. .._ /.

?- 'SIT 155 _ .' SIT 136 0 20 40 60m
1:600
m
.?
?C-144
D
C
B
A

9 q 4 5
E
6

i 1 N
1
? KEY Pray
I

? $

C-74 -146
A
6
8
* t
5

l , l C-11 C-ta C-ta C-779 -125
l
PLANTED PINE REE$ -126
5 -178 C-17 C-13 L-17
i \ It
. N 3833100 C-12
1 C-174 -133C-13
y i5 Z C-12
_
l C-13 -13 C-12
+ 5
Z

l }
T + ?
t ?

EXIT ITCH CENTERLINE
NOTES:
N 383 13.86
E 269
EL 165.
5. T.7B `

9
99' 1. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
?
, { / SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
2
7
X .
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR 517
-
EXIT DITC
N 7872992 CENTERLINE
i
79 1 &1
CHEC
OAM'
{'f r EMPLACEMENT DETAILS. t,,.,..
rte
E 269053. 7 CONTR OL PO INT 3. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS
tw
EL 16.15
- 383
269
EL 1 3997.
052.2
48 17
_ e
A, DETAILS. FOR EXIT 0I7CH GRADING.
` .
? -
- I 4. SEE SHEET C-516. EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL. I. STONE CHECK DAM DETAILS.
? r¢b? s
? P
EKIT DIT H CENTERLINE / j Y
{
'
- "' '°
N 363297
E 269049 Oa
12
5 yf _
I
N 18330W i -
?? -
- _

..ate
/ { ? :=,? ?
573W 381 CSP-ARC }
33W 361
CSTt-ARC
H
i

N 3872962.2

E 269040.86
= ;°
M 7872971.
269
E 9.1
,
/
tf
g

W
INV EL 16.4
{ ,?
,?
NV -E ?Mb.
.
1 ,ter E d? Z Z
- { 9
5
1 ! Ti /
4 G
533MM 38 AP-ARCH
f \7
f i

?
z
7
J
N 3832952.
E 269044
6 1:' /
, L
p w
.
INV EL 16.-
•
/?? 361WM C5
38028 1
92 -ARCH`" 'm
Y S w d
a Q
z
.
6 1 z
u
? 8642
I v =
/'
f 9
(? ?,
• s4r.
{
(
ra
•
- m{
51 n\??r..P. .tau. a N m Q
I
Pf
'
? J O N O

}? I
L
{ Of

? z
PLANTED PINE TREES TG ?
-f TARGET ERVICE ROAD 9 S 0
. V
¢
is,- Lu
l
7

l fig
y
.. ; \ \ \ e
0 zo ao 60m
1:600
m
-
M
m
C 14
5
D
C
B
A

t 7 q 1 4 -pi
€

KEY RIM N
t

N 3833400 c-1+ ?
C-14 -144 C-14
C-14 C-14 C-14 C-139 -125
-126
-138 C-13 C-t3 C-1}
-1 r €
C-134 -133 C-1J

STONE CHECK OAM
CONTROL POINT
N 3677306.30 C-12
C-131 -13 C-12

a
'
EXIT OITCH CENTERLINE

N 3633313.00
E 269490.56 491 .13
E EL 1 269 6.27 -
€
i 1p3
$
l#
EL 16.18
P
R
-A
CH
57383 x 3 CS
N 763770.60
3.60
E 269191.28
INY EL 16.19
EXIT DITCH CENTERLINE
N 3833316.04
E 269469.1+
EL 16.16 NOTES:

1. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.

_
EXIT DITCH CENTERLINE
7 y
533W x 301 MM CSP-ARCH
-
2 2 TARGETEEMPLACEMENT. IFOR SIT INFANTRY °AOYm
N 3637704.1
E 269491.29
I f
1 N 3833294.91
! E 269191.11
y
\ N 383 300 EMPLACEMENT DETAILS. .. q-
1
EL 16.9
(

" A 3. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS
DETAILS. FOR EXIT DITCH GRADING. r+
P A
3E, EES +. SEE SHEET C-516. EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL.
FOR STONE CHECK DAM DETAILS.
0

\\\\\\
o
r+
i t6 1 ( n \ \ a

?' _
! _
I ?
? y5 Z
¢

' T_DIT CENTE HE
1 (
M 7
1 p
? ¢
8
a-
?
' 9.
32 Z Z

!r ( .ra I..¢». >. .hin. ..
51?178t ! .. '! El t6.40
t : ° v J w
:N U
i I ( I I
11 Y> Z¢ Z

4 / p

i.g? .rss•.
r ;
.rw.. •rw.,. ...w. . »
• 1
I .r w.. ¢
.u.. w
E Q

? h
-
N 3633200 a N m Q
J p t0
z
z

i'ce' % 6 a i a

,
// 0 20 40 60m
/-'S 1 T 69_ 1:600

.2M
?C-146
D
C
B
A
1 1 2 1 j 1 4 7
1 1 2 1 3 4 5
E
i

KEY PLAN N
F
?
N 3833400 -146
C-14 C-144 C-14
C-14 C-14 C-14 C-179 -125
-126
-138 C-17 C-13 C-13
C-127 f
C-174 -137 C-13
C-12
C-13 -13 C-12

# 1!
NOTES:
1. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.

_
2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT

u
PINE ?BEES
ANT-ED
N 7837300 EMPLACEMENT DETAILS. .

Z-

U

I IS ¢ Z w
Z
z
Z z w w
z

?
f

?? .. i

U U

?
w-
U

O
re
.
// n. U
1 O
ff
Mi 3833200 i
c N m
N z
a
Al`
j

f
.....
i .dr.

-
o.

- z
°a
o:
I j
1 j _ - -pel
i

IT 1? t
i Y
pp c 1
z a
z 17
I A .. ?.r N
/

I 0 20 40 60.
- - ? cGOo

?C-147
I]
C
B
A

( I ) MMS0ION3
-
S £ z

,Y?",?i?f 1-C,
13: •5.1.3

?
? T '?. (Z 310N 1Va3N30 33

A .
1
( S)
OI117030 HIM 031M0]
y
V ;
?' •( 3180VS 031113 (•
S
D
S
-

`
3smw:, 3JV9VI5
31VO3tl00V ZOt 3131 -1-1-13
O31JVdlq] ZSl
7] Z r
m 4 A ny::` 7?! •_
F^ 35HOO3 33Y3WIS 31VO3a00V SOE
O
p
p
?
t
??"" F (MINI 1113 031JVdNOJ SOE 3OVtlO
03351313
(Z 3303 IVI13N3O 33S) OItl0030 H11A 03"HIL
y
Z ,
9 c
a
v 7

j
n

r I
6tZt 30VaO 3 3188VJ 03111

G i

0

r

? jar 3X51313

AL
31 30Y
1,
03HSIN zOSZ•0 VASZ'0
D
><
3 ?
o
Va d
v
m H

n

r n

w

3SUW:) 3JVAMS UV03pOV SOT 'S1INIl ONIHY3I3

'BY l-J 13335 335 ONIHY3l3 30 51131-1 tl03 '2
3
m 2 Z " (NIN) -1113 0313V.M3 We 'ZSZI.O i0 3dOlS-SSOtl] 03tl1I103H NIV11V 01
Z
N C
m gg (Z 310N IVH3N30 3 3S) OIN0030 N11A 03"3M3 311eYi tl3013 33VAIIS 3LV03HOV ONI1S1x3 30VID •I
n S ON00tl0 :53103
8 m

F) d
p
i ONllslx3

t

3I'
lls]
'
s.1.,
A
- Of

- ---
------ -- " 3
HO
3 N
O
ONUS
031151x3 V a Aa
_ m
r
?_
s
?
•
ad
x<
15ZI'O
13103 335 '3tl(11]0H15 1N333AVd
OYOtl 3J1
H3S SV
_.3 r_
,s
?

?. T

??

01X0

V3 3113AVd
3335 51 S1 3"OHS UIS 1NONIxWd
*3K1 1N33 OVOU NOai
V3H3 OxHVd
NI
z?m SSOH]V 0N31x3 IIVHS SOSZ'0 30
I

?

1w+T

'-
311i0Hd
0350dOtld 3dO
S-SSOtlJ
° a •V3HV ONIWVd 1V SN30la I OVOH 3]IAH3S 303M -Z
m?z

(fS
N) -I OVOH 3JIAMS Hoe YN:£Sff MY SHIOIA 3NV1 •l
°
531tlYA =
53103
3SHOO3 3JV3tlO5 31VO3tl!)OV SOE
•S• 1•N (NIN) IIIJ O31U&M SOf 3OVUO

al a A NVW NV (Z MON IV03N30 335) OIH0035 H1IA 03H3AO3 31HOYd 331113
V a Aa l a l 03HSINIi-\

Ma0 ? ?

3SWIG3 33VJWK 31VO3tl00Y ZSI
03RSINIA _
pSZ•
0
INN) 1113 a313VdMD3 SOf 7?

•'
Q 310N IVtl3N3O
33S) OIa0030 N1
1A 03H3A0J 3189vj 03111 30VtlO
p 3HSN13
l

3

30Ytl9
p3HSINii
VASZ •O
I I I•' ?- I I I
7,052.0 S31 WA 531 tlVA

i _
i -1113 031]V-O 30 S11NI1 01 ON31x3 IIVHS OIWA30 an JIHBV3 H31111 -Z
'0310N 3SIAtl3H10 SS3lW1 SH3133111IN 3uv SNOISN3WIG 1IV •t
:S310N IVH3N30
d
8

-S-1-N
voa s v
3Stl1100 3JYitlOS 31VO3bOOV SO£ •BY I-J 133HS 1335 ONIHV3;Si INIsl NIOUVtl303 'I
(MIN) Ills 0313VdN03 SOE :3103
IZ 310N lVH3N3O 3351 01H0030 NiM 03tl3AO3 JIHGVJ H31I13 ON IlOmrmm
ZSZI.O 15Z1'0 ^r? Q
30VW ozy
31I30ad
03SOd0Hd
l9
5 ? t,
r

z05-? v t j
•z.

'STN
' ?' # 100 W V dW U IS) 1 21V1 kHlNVJN XHVN0 1Vl N S
i
x
y s x 's
i Z t- 4 v
D m A
D
<
O ?
9 C
co Lo

m Dx <
'
v m
' R
m
/ ?
r m c
C g `
D
M. aa

i lro%301

SN1aIA HU39 30 JOJ 1q! T]I1113313 `
n m P ZOB-3 ONr 109-0 513305 335 \
m
x m
n a / \
/
NOIIVA313 0111 S3IYNIONro3 ro3 DS LZ1
r

?.
209-3 o
100-3 S133N5 335
9 MIDI rotl1NOJ 311 OYO l1Ytl SI

OI1YA313 ONY
300 S 303

?"ly[? -?
1
-
Z09-3 01Y 109 5133H133x5 335
V IN
Y 1NIOd 1031x03

- /
?
ZOS3 Z S-3
V

t
f
ZOS-JZ S-0 'STN
V N0I133S
e g

_ 'I'll 031Td103 MV tl3I 1111)0 831YM Atlrlll dYJ I9Y15 OW ll NI 031131x371
0 O1 0X31%3 lTNS OItlO030 ow 31118Yi a311I3 •9 19 31000 Ttl3N30 3351 OItl703D Him 03tl3A0] 31 11811! 1131113 •11'3'3'1) OD E E • aYB3a f ar
f Sll?ll
?
?? Aarlll dY] I,N INI Ttl3N 30 3351
19
31000
'0310M 35IM83M10 5531Nf1 Sa3191111IN 38Y SIOISN3NIa llY •S tl31tlar6 831rM
?
lE Z
]fa
aY! 113111!
'SHOH3NY 313113x03 t1
x1111 11VA 31303NO3 01 31OW H3Y11Y •tl31N33 NO 006 !0 NIN I IS

NONfMll%Y11 Y 033YdS S31DNY 13315 OOL % L'Zt %
0t % Zatl 3aYlq --"1 "I
L I3
lTM 313H3N07 1SNIYDY

r 1
S3I1 O..11YM 0313a1 33Y1d 't a3HSIN I
.
' 031]Ydg77
?ZSt /
Ali II BI SiA IIE 3d)l5 1
11
5 31000 3351
13odY1 33nO3H ION 11YHS H3A03 0x00119 •SONIDNrotltlltS
31010 1331)
TWIN 3X1 HLIM IM3ISISNO3 033YlIMI53a 110 a31VI39343tl I
•33
001 % x
39 lTNS S3111A113Y NOI13na15N03 All 03Oan1S10 SY3tlr •E 15O
1dA11 SZ 20t ZOII
'33Y1d-NI-1Sr3 110 1N10d 10a1N07t
Y OYOa I?tN 712 3dO15
1573tld 39 ITHS 53Mn13ndlS 31 UM3 13131130003
a3]MOIN13M 30 031311tl1SNO3 38 ITHS SIN3N33Y1d13 '2
'SAVO 9Z NI D41 9Z 30 N19N3HIS SHIOIM 1111311 30 KL Ho!

' 3AIS53tldM)J KMIININ r dOl3A3a 11THS 31333NO3 •t 109-3 ONY t08-3 133H5 33S
3H1!
IS31ON T83N30 !0 N01133MIa
1
f
5 7 s• 7 T
C
j
3

Z 1 3 1 4
C

f
DIRECTION OF GENERAL NOTES:
FIRE
SEE SHEET C-001 AND C-002 1. CONCRETE SMALL DEVELOP A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE -
FOR TOP W EERY WIDTHS STRENGTH OF 26 MPO IN 26 DAYS. S r
`
2. EMPLACEMENTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF REINFORCED
gA1LR0A0 CONCRETE: CONCRETE STRUCTURES SHALL BE PRECAST
SLOPE 2x I 1CONTROL POINT
T OR CAST-IN-PLACE.
L102 x 102 25 I
YPI 457 3. AREA DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE
z 12'7 x L 1 REVEGETATED OR RESURFACED CONSISTENT WITH THE NATURAL
STEEL ANGLE E SURROUNDINGS. GROUND COVER SMALL BE REDUCE TARGET
(SEE NOTE 5 152 FILL SLOPE 3:1 VISIBILITY.
CO PACTED P
F I FIN ISHED A. PLACE TREATED RAILROAD TIES AGAINST CONCRETE WALL ON B
LL7 152 ?.w GRADE L 102 X 102 X 12.7 x 100 STEEL ANGLES SPACED A MAXIMUM OF A
752 IMIN1 900 ON CENTER. ATTACH ANGLE TO CONCRETE WALL WITH
152
SLOPE 2X
FILTER FABRIC IMIN.1
1 SEE GENERAL NOTE 6/

APILLARY WATER BARRIER CONCRETE ANCHORS.

5. ALL OIYENS IONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

{' Y
S
R1] REBAR • 300 O.C.E.W. FILTER FABRIC CDVERED WITH GEOGRID (SEE GENERAL NOTE 61. G. FILTER FABRIC AWD GEOGRIO SMALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF
(CENTERED IN WALL AND SLAB) CAPILLARY WATER BARRIER AND COMPACTED FILL. 't9
SECTION A
N.T.S. Ci 3C-503

-- ---I---- --- ---- - -- ---- ---- o -- ---- --- - --- ---- ---- T --_
A A aRI? aaw?c I ?
/ C1 3 -503 a `
C-5 3 C-503

?
TOE OF BER1( / ?'
=

CONTROL POINT A
SEE SHEETS C-0Sl AND C-002
1
1372 1
F 7 CONTROL POINT A
SEE SHEETS C-0 O1 AND C-002
• 1372
1 \
FOR COORDINATES AND ELEVATI ON AILROAD TIE FOR COORDINATES AND ELEVATION ,
t 1

M AIL TIE COIITROL
POINT B
152 Y 50 SEE ETS
15 50
C
A
E
t
E
FOR
T
C
OOgDIN
AND EL
VATION
127
S
r
I CONTROL POINT B 1 4
Ctl U
Z W
\

\ SEE SHEETS C-001 AND C-002
FOR COODINATES AND ELEVATION /

SEE SHEETS C-001 AND C-002
I`C W
W w

Z w W

\\ FE

FOR TOP
FLQ
T-
OF BERM WIDTHS

W
n 6 TTP. W w
N
N N

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

¢
T \
Lr i
j ut
w m
0 a

J 23 w
O

?
7 U ¢
8000 AT SOY TARGETS e o
10000 AT IOOM TARGETS i ¢
?
# N I
DOUBLE STATIONARY INFANTRY TARGET (SIT) EMPLACEMENT
N.T.S.
?s
C-50"
t

D TDE A
OF BERM C C SOa -T
---- - --------------- ------- -------
------ -----------
-
p
POINT B
C
O
L
NNTRRO
ppp
S
EE
E
B
ORCDH8ATE5"AD ELEV.
1 ScO
A ELECTRICAL BIL OUT RAILROAD
. I 151 SEE DETAIL 1) TIE (TYP) 2m
152E
1
?
f
2m N
?pp
?
TES
LT97
ONA
ELEV. 45' a 5'
I( 152 (1WD (TYPT W
ill
30.000. if
PLAN
N.T.S.
B
c- MOVING INFANTRY TARGET EMPLACEMENT
C C
N.T.S.
. NOTE: SEE SHEET C-802 FOR GENERAL NOTES+
_
TOP OF BERM WIDTH.
RAILROAD TE
i
CONTROL POINT CONCRETE SHALL DEVELOP A MNMJM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF

ORECTDN 28 MPa N 28 DAYS.

T
Z1FR.-Gi?1i1
?
25 ITYP> OpE Y2 OF FIRE ' EMPLACEMENTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF REINFORCED CONCRETE:
3
11

2 CONCRETE STRUCTURES SHALL BE PRECAST OR CAST-N-PLACE.
FILL SLOPE 660 --COMPKTEO
i x
L1 7 x0 3' AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE
REVEGETATE
OR RES
RFA
T
T
T
E
C
ISTE D
311 152 152 FLL7 STEEL ANGLE NT WI
H
D
U
D
ONS
HE NA
URAL
C
GROUND COVER SHALL NOT REDUCE TARGET
SURROUNDINGS
.
(MIN) X
SLOPE t (SEE NOTE 5) .
VtSeLl Y .a a
w

GRACIE
TO T-

152

FINISHED

a
.

DRAIN 0.0
_
15T (MIl . PLACE TREATED RAILROAD TES AGAINST CONCRETE WALL ON
L102 X D2 X 12.7MI X IOOWM STEEL ANGLES SPACED A

are
SCO- PE2(M7 M) FILTER FABRIC
CAPILLARY WATER BARRIER (SEE GENERAL NOTE 7) MAXIMUM OF 900M ON CENTER. ATTACH ANGLE TO
CONCRETE WALL WITH CONCRETE ANCHORS f
.
FILTER FABRIC COVERED WITH CEOGRD 5. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE
(SEE GENERAL NOTE 7) •13 REBM 111 300 O.C. E.W.
(CENTERED IN WALL AND SLAB) INDICATED.

B U
2' r
B
SECTION rA\ 6. THE EMPLACEMENT MAY BE REVERSED OR HWlRORED FROM WHAT Y U 2
IS SHOWN HERE. N ANY CASE, THE PROTECTED END OF THE
1 - f
N.T.S. C-tg-604 EMPLACEMENT IS ALWAYS NEARER TO THE FANG POINT AND THE !
2 ¢ Z w
ELECTRICAL BLOCXOUT IS ON THE PROTECTED END. $ Y O: ' w
J
7, FILTER FABRIC AND GEOGRD SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF C j w a
457
0 76

x CAPILLARY WATER BARRIER AND COMPACTED Fly.. j VI
y j l1 J
w(L

Z F
U W

F
w

MP
CT
381
W 381 SD
S
2 w ¢
ED
A
FINISHED CO
FILL FILL \ /
a- a w In
FILTER FABRIC ELECTRNCAL \ /
IX BLOCNOIIT ..._»]/// J In 0
a ¢
i
CON
RETE WA ¢ IT
C
LL ¢
a o 4
SECTION DUAL 1 Y w i
KT-S. C• a C-
ELE
CTRICAL BLOCKOUT DETAIL S a J
= ^
>
i E
A N.T.S. +{ f ^
M
tl 7

I

.s
C-504

C
31
AI
i
GE)ERAL NOTES:
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS IREESS OTHERWISE NOTEO.
2. FILTER FABRIC ANND GEOGAID SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF COMPACTED FILL.
DIRECT 1011 _ 2000 3. FILTER FABRIC SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF CAPILLARY WATER BARRIER.
OF FIRE -CONTROL POINT
TOP OF TINDER WALL
2Y
705
1676
3 1524 11 EXTEND WALL TO A POINT
1 SLOPE 2% OS ABOVE FINISHED ARE
rCOPACTED FILL ?1
TNIIMT WALL ?6W 2% FILTER FABRIC 1.1 GE)ERAL NOTE
I SEE SHEET SiM /Y1N.1 152 .IN CAPILLARY MATER BARRIER FIHISMEO GRADE
FOR RETAINING FILTER FABRIC COVERED WI TN GEOGRID ISEE GENERAL NOTE 2)
WALL DETAILS) CONCRETE PAD (SEE NOTE 31 -
COMPACTED FILL
H-PILE SIPPON
N. T. S.Ci05 CiGS
SECTIO A
NOTES:
` 1. CONCRETE SHALL DEVELOP A MINIMA COMPRESSIVE
STRENGTH OF 26 MMA IN 28 DAYS.
2. SEE SHEET E-506 FOR CONCRETE PAD LOCATIONS.
3. DESIGN OF CONCRETE PAD IS THE RESPONSIBILITY
OF THE CONTRACTOR.
POWERCENTER
EMPLACEMENT
N.T.S.
A
I I I III
?i
®al
Ic
z
° w E
w
Z
r
z I w
U 0 W L
N O J U
> Z Z' Q
o - a
21 u
u U L
U Q w
L W
'S N W
C In m Z
J
a ¢ a ¢
D 0 s
u 00
F w
a _x
Q
i x
C
I I z
10000
1700 1600 2550 2500 1650
DIRECTION
OF FIRE
IDOWNRANGEI
z o i
TYPICAL FIRING LANE POSITION LAYOUT
N.T.S

f
SERVICE ROAD 1
TOP OF DITCH -\ 3
SERVICE ROAD 1
TOP OF DITCH -
l
a9
I(
FABRIC FILTER COVERED ?F INISXED
WITH GEOCRIO ISEE GENERAL NDTE 2)
EAST/WEST CENTERLINE FIRING BE
RM SECTION GRADE
N.T.S _COMPACTED FILL
N 3832120.26 N 3632176.68 w ^

SERVICE ROAD 4
E 269910.16
E 269966
87 SERVICE ROAD

TOP OF DITCH
EL 20.10 .

EL 20.10 TOP OF DITCH
:1 3: DIRECTION ?NORTH/SOUTH
j

1

N 7832727.31 FIRE CENTERLINE OF
(D
(DOWNRANGE/ FIRING BERN :1

N 3832162.57

1 3:

HI E 269917.25
EL 20.10
E 269952.69
j M
d
; cl EL 20.10 ?j
N 3832113.20 ?j <1 'L4 8

E 269903.07

3:1

wl

3:1
'

N 3832155.52 N 3832169.67 7:1
¢
I

3:1

N 3632163.74
CC
W z
2
W
1
EL 20.10
?i N 7812131.36 N 3832111.11
E 2fi9959.78
E 269915.60
u1 E 269973.96 '} o

Wj

E 26
9921.31

E 26991.12

7872118.17

EL .1
20 0
EL 20.10

EL 20.10
ii

2 Z
wj EL 20.10 EL 20.10 E 269931.51 HI `
y' is

EL 20.10
I z
: o z
] w
N
U J

2
3:7 LAN E 1 I ANE LANE LAVE 5 LANE 6 LANE 7 LANE 8
Alf
LANE t
0 -
Z S
¢

J
_.
,
j 7:1 2% o
`
y c
w
E
AST/WEST
U
Q
i w
o
E
NTERLINE OF
1 z U)
FIRING BERN ,?. I I J J N m
3:1 3:1 3:1 3t1 / a at a 4

I
CENT
ER OF
7 ¢
RAILROAD TIE - j t
a o
1 U

A
~
I
2
}
!
F
w
I I e a j

3 1 I
I i
~ i ¢
E
I :1 I 3:1 T
RAILROAD TIE YPICAL FIRING LANE RAILROAD TIE
CENTER OF STEPS 3.1 3.1 F
e i
I STEPS RAILROAD TIE (SEE NOTE 1)
ISEE NOTE 1/
m
A (TYP.> F I T7P.1 PLAN A - ROOF TOP FIRING POSITION

)
B (TYP - B - STANDING FIRING POSTION-
.

C I77P.1
E ITYP.1 N.T.S C - WALK-IN FIGHTING FIRING POSITION

0 - PROW FIRING POSITION

0 (TYP
) FIRING BERM E - WINDOW/BUNNER APERTURE FIRING POSITION
. F - KNEELING FIRING POSITION
N.T.S
C - 506
1 9 n
L 3 1
SODO 4• SEE SHEET C-514 FOR RAILROAD TIE STEP DETAILS.
3 3
3 I 4 I 5
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. FILTER FABRIC AND GEOGRID SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF COMPACTED FILL.
3. SEE SHEETS C-507 AND CiOB FOR FIRING POSITIONS DETAILS.
IDYL
i? 11
FABRIC FILTER COVERED "--FINSHEO
WITH GEOGRIO ISEE GENERAL NOTE 27 GRADE
NORTH/SOUTH CENTERLINE FIRING BERM SECTION
N.T.S
100000
1 7 A
E

4

400
GENERAL NOTES: cp

RAILROAD TES
~~
1. CONCRETE SHALL DEVELOP A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH f
TYP. OF 29 MPO IN 28 DAYS.
2. ALL REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE PER ASTM A615. GRADE 60.
1000 RAILROAD TES
Typ,
J.
AREAS
DISTURBED
BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SMALL BE
D
OR RESURFACED CONSISTENT WITH THE NATURAL
SURROUN
ING
SURROI
I
- GROUND COVER SHALL NOT REDUCE TARGET

•NiY REBAR
L
TV.
TV.
VISIB
IL
1. ALL WOOD FRAYING SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED. ALL WOOD
500 CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE WITH HOT-DIPPED GALVANIZED NAILS. C

AAVRAMA
W AA L

/// 250 FR14G POSITION

OSI
T
r S. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. t
t
?
H M PP
T
io
i 8s H
500 2? 7
HMI
RAILROAD TIES
TYP.
FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW PLAN 600 OUL
N.T.S. N.T.S. N.T.S.
I I IS
IS

KNEELING FIRING POSITION
(F) a

-

-
T
.S.
N.
WOOD POLE FRONT FIRM
POSITION

2000
CONCRETE

W
G

- PLAN
- 2
50.100

WOOD
N.T.S.
S
0

BRACING. 600 : 4 j

50.100 : m 0 IL Z
• WOOD
BRACING
jjFIRlIG POSITON Y
/ 0 W a
E 0
FR
OON
FR04G CONCRETE 1000 p
• a U O
R
T V x w a
p 19 PLYWOOD ¢ N m Z
50.150 NOTES. -1
a o

y
0

?
Wood
BRACING 1. WOOD POLE SHALL BE TREATED WITH A .
j ¢
4
PRESERVATIVE TREATMENT.
. a 0
.
E 150
•
iIN51ED GRAD II
i
?
?
?

300 900 -?
tso
-
ts0 e a ?
DOX40OX100 DE
'2
CIftU MIJ BLOCK
TYP CK
SIDE VIEW
=
F RONT VIEW SIDE VIEW PLAN T
S
N e 1

N. S.
N.T.S.
N.T.S. .
.
.

WINDOW/ BUNKER APERTURE FIRING POSITION (f-) STANDING FIRING POSITION (B)

N.T.S.
N.T.S.
C-507
D
C
B
A

B
A
14 n
C

1 2 3

6990
IOQ 700 3000 2840 ISO gwp
1730
$ SLOPE 2X (YNI
TOP
OF WALL
COARSE )4 •19
AGGREGATE 00 X 450
3 FILTER RENT DOWEL o
)I- •19 X 150 (TYP)

?? BENT DOWEL (TYP)
150
SLOPE 2X DRAIN BLOCKWi
150 p • , ?- - • 750
3 .p•..a. ep l.p•.p•.p•. p•.p• •.O ?•. ••: ?•: •• 150
1r
300
W
•
ROPE 2X
AGGREGATE E T
IN AL
.
(CENTERED N ALL WALLS AND SLAB)
(?.)
'
WALK
IL BC
(SET QNEA/RAL NOTE 7) CAPILLARY WATER BARRIER
SECTION C
N.T.S. C -508 As
O"'CT10N
OF FOE
1
C
C-]
SR (DOWNRANGE)

ISO 2500

U _ I _(
2200

L50
COARSE
L F P
py
fipf.
?
'
P Pfi •
m
150
a 150
1420

$ "AGGREGATE.
AWALK\
30 0
AGGREGATE
FILLER
ORAN BLOCKWT
150
(TYP)
(4) •19 X. 450
BENT DOWEL
M 300 O.C.(TYP)
(3) •19 X 450
SENT DOWEL
• SOO O.C.(TYP)
T ? I
PLAN
N.T.S.
A
WALK-IN FIGHTING FIRING POSITION (C)
N.T.S.
FIRM POSITION
FRONT FIRM
POSITION
2100
PLAN
N.T.S.
4
GENERAL NOTES'
1. CONCRETE SHALL DEVELOP A MNMMI COMPRESIVE STRENGTH
OF 29 MP. N 28 DAYS.
2. WALK-IN FIGHTING POSITIONS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF REINFORCED 6
CONCRETE: CONCRETE STRUCTURES SHALL BE PRE-CAST OR i D
CAST-N-PLACE.
3. ALL RENFORCNG STEEL SMALL BE PER ASTM ASIS.GRADE 60.
4. AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE
REVEGETATED OR RESURFACED CONSISTENT WITH THE NATURAL
SURROUNDINGS. GROUND COVER SHALL NOT REDUCE TARGET
VMB LITY.
5. ALL WOOD FRAMING SHALL BE PRESSUE TREATED. ALL WOOD E
CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE WITH NOT-DIPPED GALVANIZED NAILS. a
6. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. all
7. FILTER FABRIC SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF CAPILLARY WATER{
BARREN. ![ f3
- 3i `87
SAID SACS
C
]00
NOTES S5AANApp 8 SHALL BE
POLYPROPYLE WITH A UV
INI4SITER. w
SIDE VIEW
N.T.S.
- - =
500
SAO BAGS
50000
WOOD
BRACING
FINIj GRADE
20OX40OX100 SIDE VIEW FRONT VIEW
OW BLOCK N.T.S. N.T.S.
ROOF TOP FIRING POSITION (A)
N.T.S.
3 4
PLAN
N.T.S.
PRONE FIRING POSITION (D)
N.T.S.
7- 1 5
L) E
Z
q ? W .
4a;
$Z Z
:3 W U)
• ti V J Z
Y C)
Z 2 ^
2 U (p
U Q
_ s w a
m
a IN
m Z
J
a ¢ a ?
[ LL
1 ? V
Y ? W
b b ?_
L ?

I . I 7 d
E
E
GENERAL NOTE:
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
,1- SEE SHEET E-509 FOR RANGE LIMIT MARKER POWER AND LIGHT
FIXTURE MOUNTING DETAIL.
'
3• LOCATION OF LIMIT MARKERS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BY BASE RANGE
SAFTEY OFFICER.

E
1120 p
; Ey

51 r
51
19W EXTERIOR PLYWOOD E
d8Q
RED AND BLACK STRIPES
STRIPES SHALL ANGLE C
DOWN TOWARDS THE
RANGE
L
o _
152-
7

305

RANG E

1E2M1 X W
iPATED W POSTS -

-

f q
z
U
q W
L?

?. a z
1

t g
z Q

;' I. La
V7 j w
O J w
Y

E LEVATION VIEW c10F VIEW
RANGE L IMIT MARKER W a
N. T. S. al
a o m w
v
j
a o

Y u
w
e a x
z
a
NOTE: a
t
f. DIAGONAL STRIPES ON LIMIT MARKER SMALL ANGLE GOWN TOWARDS THE RANGE. tl f
2. LOCATION OF LIMIT MARKERS (A) TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BY BASE RANGE SAFTEY OFFICER.

F? .Xw
B
D
C
B
A

A
1 4
I
? I 3
C
C
E
F
1
7.315M TOTAL W107H
a 3658
sW
152 DIA.
STEEL PIPE Uyl
213
127 DIA. STEEL PI
0
irtL
4 1 cJ
GENERAL NOTE:
I- ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
\ 19 x 127 PII
25L
22 DIA W E THR 10 HOLE F
PIPE AND PLATE 2 PADLOCKS
NOTE: ALL EXPOSED STEEL TO
BE PRIMED AND PAINTED.
LOCK DETAIL
N.T.S.
SECURITY BARRIER ELEVATION
N. T. S.
STREHCTHxBULT. HIGH
NOTE: ALL EXPOSED STEEL TO
BE PRIMED AND PAINTED.
?T U STANDARD
25 SPACER , ANNELL 7 X 9.8
32 41 152 DIA.
A. STEEL STEEL PIPE
165 DIA. 13 THICK PLAT f-?-25 DIA. STEEL PIPE
POST 17
WELD TO PIPE E 5
JS 27 DIA. HOLE EI'LAPIPE
127 DIA.
STEEL PIPE E E
ls2 01 A. 127 DIA.
STEEL PIPE STEEL PIPE
5 DMA.
STEEL PIPE
27 THRUM BOTH?PLATE$ ZZ 5 pp
MELD TO PIPE THICK PLATE SiEELiA. STEELAPIPE 279 x 279 x 13
STEEL STIFFENER WELD
70 PIPE AND PLATE
25 DIA X 51 HIGH 152 WIDE X 305 LONG X 13 (NOTCH OUT FOR BOLT HEAD)
STRENGTH BOLT. THICX STEEL PLATE
SECURITY BARRIER DETAILS
N.T.S.
d G
EI D
03l
i_ xsr
i_ .
u
z
W
Q j
z w
Z, LU
N O LU W
o Z a
Q
U U 0]
a >
UI ~
J N 0]
O U
a G.
Q ? R N
w
a ?
? a
f f
r
3
I
SE
POST FOUNDATION
N. T. S.
1
D
1

C 9-GAGE TE Y/RES
( 2. O.C. WU .)
U X. ND
AT
TTACHMENT
TOP OR BRACE RAILA
N.T.S.
fl OU
STEEI
TE WIRE TE WRE
10.4Y O.C. MAX. AO (0.4M O.C. MAX. AND
W17HN 0.%mM FROM WITYN O.MI FROM

B TOP AND BOTTOM TOP AM BOTTOM
OF FABRIC) OF FABRIC)
H-BE ROUND POST
LINE POST ATTACHMENTS
N.T.S.
O.3M
2
MOLDED EXOTHERMIC WELD
OR APPROVED CLAMP-TYPE
FITTING OF COPPER (TYP)
NOTES:
L S1 LL eE B t& f THE
0.
AD- FENCE POST AID THE
TENSION WIRE.
2. FOR GATES USE A •6
BRIBED COPPER GRQIMID
STRIP TO CONNECT GATE
TO GROUNDED FENCE POST
GROUNDING DETAIL
N.T.S.

4 I 5

1.B3M

SINGLE OUTRIGGER GATE LEAF VERTICAL BARBED
TO UNSECIIIRE
SIDE 3 STRND
6 WIRE APRON
3 STRANDS OF BARBED W E TOP RAIL (TYP)
8ARBFD WIRE

MADE
BRACE RAIL (TY
)
ATCH
3 CATE POST BRACE RAIL (T ' P)
w
i
' )TYP)

TRUSS R, 0
(TYPI
ICS (TYP.) BOTTOM ENSDM
111 1111 WIRE IT)'P)
FLEXBLE 1 11 1 i 11 1
GROUND STRAP ) I I I 111 I AOE LINE
IUI IU1
L _I L _1
PERSONNEL GAT E
ELEVATION
N.T.S.
TENSION BAD TENSION BAND
(0.4M O.C. MAO. IBRIT RO WITHIN O.L
FRpI TOP ITD CY OF FABRIC)
FABRIC
ENSED WIiE OR
TARE WIRE
TENSOR BARBOLT f-I T
(9.5 MIN, DIA.) TO LT
ROLWD POST ENGNGE ACH F. LINK
BRACE RAIL CLAMP DETAILS FIND OR GATE POST DETAIL TENSION BAND DETAIL
"Ts FASTENING DETAILS
N.T.S.
GENERAL NOTES-
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. DETAILS S"D%% ARE TO CLARIFY REQUIREMENTS AND ARE NOT
INTENDED TO LIMIT OTHER TYPES OF FENCE SECTIONS AND METRO
OF INSTALLATION.
3. WIRE TIRES. RAILS. POSTS. AND BRACES SMALL BE CONSTRUCTED
ON THE SECURE SIDE OF THE FENCE ALIGNMENT. CHAIN-LINK
O FABRIC SMALL BE PLACED ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE SECURE
AREA.
O 4. FENCE SHALL "AVE EXTENSION ARMS EXTENDED OUTWARD
FROM THE AREA BEING PROTECTED.
5. C-SECTION POSTS SMALL BE INSTALLED SO THAT THE VOID
INSIDE THE POST IS COMPLETELY FILLED WITH CONCRETE UP
ATCH TD iNE TOP OF THE FOUNDATION.
STANDARD HINGE ?_ 6. SWING GATE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH PADLOCK AND
ASSEMBLY LATCH ASSEMBLY.
N.T.S. N.T.S. 7. GATE FRAME SHALL BE A MINIMUM 40 MILLIMETER NOMINAL
(ROUND) OR 50 MILLIMETER NOMINAL (SQUARE). GATE FRAME
SHALL BE OF WELDED CONSTRUCTION OR SHALL BE ASSEMBLED
FITTINGS AT CONTRACTOR'S OPTION A WELDED
LOCK PN (79.5 BARBED WIRE (TYP.)
45• TRUSS MOD
(9S MIN.OI
9.5 PLAN PIN PN
RIVETED FLUSH (TYP) LUSH (TYP.) t
CONCRETE BASE
lWE POST CORNER POST
A
EXTENSION ARM DETAILS
N.T.S.
TRUSS ROD AND BAND
N.T.S.
1 2 I 3
STEEL POST SCHEDULE
USE AND SECTION LORIN OUTSIDE
DIMENSIONS (MONK&,
CORIIER.END A, PULL POSTS 73 O.D.
TUBULAR - ROUND 63 SQUIRE
TUBULAR - SQUARE 59 X 89
C-SECTION (ROLL FORMED)
TW?
O.O.
so
TUBULAR - ROUND 57 7 X 43
H-SECTION SJ % 43
C-SECTION (ROLL FORMED
TOP 6 BRACE RAILS 42 O.D.
TUBULAR - ROUND
TUBULAR - SQUARE b O.D.

H•SECTION 41 X b

C-SECTION (ROLL FORMED 41 X 32
4

USING HEAVY
HORIZONTAL BRACE MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF TRUSS RODS TO
BRACE MELDED GATE FRAME. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROPER RIGID CONSTRUCTION OF GATE
SUPPLIED.
GATE POST SCHEDULE
GATE LEAF WID TH OUTSIDE DIMENSION
(NOMINAL) (NOMINAL)
TAN 73 00,
63 SO
NOT&
BOND N16 FLEXIBLE GROUND STRAP
TO FATE POST AND GATE BY MOLDED
EXOTHERMIC WELD OR APPROVED
CLAMP-TYPE FITTING OF COPPER.
5

W u
ti W
w ?
z z w
W W
N O J u
z
> T 2 LL
O S u Y
u
~ y J
J NO CO
a j ¢ u
a 0
u
9
` z a
E
I - I
D
C
B
A
CHAIN-LINK SECURITY FENCE DETAIL
N.T.S.
1 G
C

OOR GENERAL NOTES:
'_ '6- E VAT I IFFE1 EXISTING EXISTING
t. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
FINISHED 1 GROUND GROUND
-
GRADE T62 2.FILTER FABRIC AND GEOGRIO SHALL EXTEND TO L IMITS OF COMPACTED FILL.

1L JI
?
COWACTED FILL
NOTE: ELEVATION OF FINISHED GRADE AT INTERFACE
EXIT DITCH
WITH BUILDING EXTERIOR. SHALL BE 152 BELOW FFE.
N.T.S.

1 OK OF ROAD
R 20Y I
1 R 20M
GRADING AT BUILDING EXTERIOR
N.T.S.
I
9
,f
1IS
RAY (719.1 . I ?
I e ag i P
j 77.1707•
? I
I
TARGET SEMICE 1
9 I
y?
ST. 11W J; 1 P
'
N ROPE TO EITHER
WOINDIN
TET
SIDE OF
SLOE OF ROM OAD CENiE11L RE OF OF CM
SAC
102.8293•
7.729M 1
,1 4
• s1 Js
e
l
a
'I
TARGET SERVICE ROAD TURNAROUND

ti?
3
e ? 1
$
i
i
R - 20Y j
R = 20M

C
L I
EDGE OF RMO
VARIES VARIES
MANEUVER TRAIL CUL-DE-SAC
N.T.S.
1% 1%
3 3

-------
a --- --
D
IIIIII
Y?
C
7 u E
Z
w
0
w 7
ZO Z w J_
N V J Q
r
i i o
o - a
u tJ 7
u a 0
0 Z
= w a a
C In m J
J
O J
a ¢ a u
a O N
u x
w
a Z
a
FILTER FABRIC 305 COMPACTED FILL (WIN)
COVERED WITH GEOGRID
(SEE GENERAL NOTE 21
EXISTING
GROUND
MEDVAC LANDING AND BIVOUAC AREA
N.T.S.
t Z d ?i
1 2 3 4
E BIVOUAC AREA
1
I
i
i
M 3.05Y 10.9734
D 1 3.6584 3.658M 3.658Y
I
1
j SINGLE SHEAVE CAST
NOTE)
i ALummm STATIONARY
TRUCK
1
1 ?
CONTRACTION JOINT (TYP.)
1 (SEE SHEET S-301FOR DETAIL)
I
1 Sp
i Sp
1
I
1
j -10 BRAIDED
POLYPROPYLENE
C HALYARD
I
1
I
1
PLAN 157 REINFORCED CONCRETE PAD
I
S
I •13 a 300 O.C. E.W. AT N.T.S.
i 63 BELOW TOP OF SLAB v'
r.:?:Nr.r.•e y r.•r.;eN::r.:N
1 tY. 230 CAST
j ALUIMAJM CLEAT
i FISHED GRADE NISED GRADE
152 CAPILLARY WATER BARKER E TI N FILTER FABRIC (SEE NOTE 1)
N.T.S. NOTE: i
1. FILTER FABRIC SHALL EXTEND TO LYTS OF CAPILLARY
WATER BARRIER.
B BIVOUAC PAD
M.T.S.
SEE PLANS FOR LENGTH
OF CULVERT EXTENSION 4 HARDWOOD CENTERING WEDGES
EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE BLACK ASPHALTUM PAINT ON
SURFACE OF POLE AND SLEEVE
\ASSEMBLY BELOW GRADE
-- 130 MIN. BUTT OM q
_________________ _______
____ ORECTONJ FLOW__ .-A.. 600 ________................... • 19 CLAD D GROUND COPPER SPICE
-
CLEAN OUT DEBRIS FROM INLET WELDED TO BOTH PLATES
NOTES
My E JOIN
A 2?TEMATER At OF NEW TO MATCH PPE MATERIAL OF
3. SLOPE OF PPE EXTENSION TO MATCH SLOPE OF
EXISTING PPE.
CULVERT PIPE EXTENSION
N.TS.
1 2 3 4
5
GENERAL NOTE;
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE YILMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
rAL76 7 DIAL ALUMINUM BALL
STROBE LIGHT
IA
MM MRAGPOLE
I III D
all
C
y ? -

750 Al1AMF1lA1
MN. FLASH COLLAR i
UUU tJ
Z p
o
CA LKING COMPOUND tt w
6

f.;N
Y

S a i
Q 7
:Jt is
.
s •yL'l, 2
Co 2 w J

Xt
? N ? w
f7 J
¢
}Z
} w a w
TAMPED NO DRY SCREENED SRO = U N
15 GA GALVANIZED CORRUGATED STEEL TUBE
4 WELDED STEEL WEDGES
F U
S w
w
13 THCK WELDED STEEL PLATE = U)
w ¢ Z
¢

• NEAT EXCAVATION J O m J
13 TRIG( STEEL SUPPORT RATE ¢ 2 N
g ? CONCRETE i5
1 a u Y

Y ..
10o e a z
450 $ = a
I€ c Z
A
NOTE LOCATE TRUCK NWTHSIDE OF FLAGPOLE
tl
WITN STROBE LIGHT OHT 150 DEGREES FROM iRLKO( ?
FLAGPOLE
N.T.S.
5
1 I 2
D
C
B
A
L-------------------------'M----------------------------------
1 '1B? ZAk? ?4?- I SBJ i? 1
16 9 I 1
1 I I 9 10? 1 OB
' 1 I I I ' I I I I 1
' 1 I I ' ' ' ' I I 1
' I I I ' ' I I I 1 1
?I I 1 1 ' ' ' ' I I 1
pprl ' I I ' ' ' ' ' I I
7.1 1 1 1 ' 1 ' ' ' I I
1 ? I
4; I ' ' TMOET 600f 1rn.1 ? ? '' ' 1
1 ' I 1 I I
001--- ;-{
to5? Li1oc
I 1 I I ' I 1 I I 1 I
I 1 I I I I I I I 1 1
1 I 1 I ' I I I 1 1 1 '.
I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I
I I I 1 ' I- I 1 1 1 I
1 I. 1 1 ' I I I 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 ' I I I I 1 1
I ? 1 I I 1 I I 1 1
BZO
N.T.S.
152
152 m
152 PVC BOOT
L POINT FINISH GRADE
NO1 ZdITAI CONT CONTRO
?0 % 100 11000 POSFOR PANELS W(By OOD OTHERS)
CONCRETE
75
2 2 PVC
PLAN VIEW SIDE VIEW
N.T.S. N.T.S.
TARGET BOOTS
N.T.S.
1 1 . 2
3 I 4 I 5
GENERAL NOTES:
I. CONCRETE SHALL DEVELOP A MINIMUM COMPRESIVE STRENGTH
OF 29 MPo IN 20 DAYS.
2. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
F 3. GEOGRID SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF COMPACTED FILL.
FIRING LINE
Ael6 DEFORMED STEEL
REINFORCED BAR
I SPACED 61OW)
RAILROAD TIES
1152 X 204 %
RAILROAD TIE STEP SECTION DETAI
N.T.S.
TARGET
BOOT NORTHING EASTIMNG
IA 76=102.34
to 302103.11
2A 34100.67 t
28 3=104.M
2C 3532W019
2D 38=127
3A 3672104.86
30 7632105.77 26663675
M 367210632 26803.77
4B 3532107.10 2WBON.to
1C 34090AS 26661691
4D 36453.92 268616.77
SA 3672107.53 261842.21
58 764100.8 53184084
8A 3672106.96 20084L05
TARGET
0007 NDRTIlIC EASING
60 38109.15 10801696
6C 36DO115.So 211061.82
WD 3632088.56 20NO 25
?A 3632116.31 2684Q.OB
367211100 20984652
34111.84 280846.9
r 3632112.41 26350.90
3iO86.M 2e6e3.m
7672086.23 211056.13
30.4112.86 28853197
6o 7532117.74 26069AD
1011 3672111.29 286684.41
108 36211507 18868.84
10C 33210112 20806150
too 3532101.80 26353D1
BZO TARGET BOOT LOCATION
RAILROAD TIE STEPS (SIDE VIEW)
N. T. S.
NOTES:
L STEPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF TREATED RAILROAD TIES
AND SECURED WITH 016 DEFORMED STEEL REINFORCING BARS
DRIVEN VERTICALLY THROUGIIT FIELD-OIILLED HOLES.
THE BARS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM LENGTH OF 460MM AND
SHALL BE LOCATED ON A 61061 SPACING.
2. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE EXTEND THE FULL LENGTH OF STEPS.
3 4 5
SECTION
N.T.S. C-5 4C-C-510
I
C
I C
I f
1 95
197 A-C
MARINE PLYWOOD
/?YOW CNARAL 7ER
+/ LINE WIDTH

0
so

20
CON
FINISHED
TARGET 900
T
'SEE NOTE 41
SINGLE RANGE LANE MARKER
N.T.S.
71
Al METER LANE MAPICERS
LANE MARKER TYPE COHIV0LPOKTA CONTROL PONTB CONTROL POWC
NORTHING EASING NORTHING EASING NDRRlNG EASTNG
BOOM LANE MARKER 1 SINGLE 3972430.76 201171.59 363243115 20117213
010M LANE MARKER I-I DOUBLE 3632241.01 269701.42 39324864 21296.04 2932493.09 224295.66
8001 LANE MARKER 24 DOUG E 393E50.79 29321.52 ]632351.61 =4220 38MnB3 7892427
BOOM LANE MARKER 34 ODL E 3637017.55 2Wa42 3832906.51 29063.16 367731.47 2=23.924
61MLANEMABKER43 DOABLE 3672961.57 2M=N 367266240 21721.76 3672967.42 299321.01
NINA LANE MARKER 54 DOUBLE 382712.77 259375.13 3MV13.61 201075.98 3MU14.48 280.776.86
1100/LANE MARKER6.7 DOUBLE 3872760.31 201626.1 3637761.12 21129.7 3832291.93 209127.49
60dA LANE MIAREN 7a OOLIBIE 37}2016.71 162401,29 =1105..7 2166126 79329120 7011724
e9DM1 LANE MAIIKER 64 tK711B1E ]932965.s1 701517.70 70.7761.16 28932932 302 M.67 769518.73
800/ LANE MARKER 9.10 DOI1BIA 3632932.24 71598.17 3932993.01 28657.7 31.17161.70 2MW93
8001 LANE MARKER 10 SNGUE 363214.30 2911656.16 3W x14.63 21857.25
RANGE MARKER LOCATION
1 2
3
D
ACE
POINT B
4 5
NOTES:
1. MARK DDD NUMBERED LANES WITH BLACK NUMERALS ON A WHITE
B
ACKGRGUND. MARK EVEN NUMBERED LANES ¦I TN KITE NUMERALS
OH BLACK BACKGROUND.
2.INSTALL EACH MARKER USING 2-1007 x IOOW TREATED MOOD
POSTS. PLACE POSTS IN 152MM CIA. PVC PIPE TARGET BOOTS'
MARKERS IDOLIBNTO NGRAS INGLETSNEETTOF
PLYWOOD WITH 3 WOW POSTS SHALL BE USED.
3. BOTTOM OF MARKER 914MM ABOVE GROUND.
4. SEE SHEET C-514. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS. FOR TARGET BOOT
DE TAILS.
5. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
IIII°IC
q
ACE BW fEE?E
?fl4
C
FINISHED GRADE CONTROL POINT C
CONTROL
CONTR)L POINT B-A ARGET 0 T
SEE NOTE 4)
DOUBLE RANGE LANE MARKER
N.T.S. i
q u p
244 q Z l7
(zr :3
82 Z
W J
:0 7 W
197 At w a J F
MARINE PLYWOOD
//?--KKK01N CHARACTER Y E S O
' LINE WIDTH C7 = u w
j u ¢ O
... £ N
a
J N GO ZJ
1 Ir n
Q u
a d U
d O ^1
_ U E
K 1- W
e a ?_ Z
a
G{
B i A
724
N .
C-515
4
40D METER LAME MARKERS
LANE MARKER TYPE CONTROLPONrA COIAROLPOMTB CONTROL POWC
IIORIING EASING WRIHIG EASING NORIIMG EASTNO
400M LANE MARKER 1 SINGLE 363W1.40 286517.36 3137272.47 269537 97
400M LANE MARKER 1-2 DOUBLE 30. MAS 259MA1 3671296.23 269310.1 363279528 269560.55
400M LANE MARKER 2,3 DOUIE 3632338.31 299579.05 3637379.31 289579.78 3012M30 299501.45
4001 LANE MARKER 34 DOUBLE 393217026 78980299 3637371.22 28%0].73 383202.18 26691.45
400M LANE MARKER 4a DOUBLE 3832400.63 201829.77 383241.76 78952916 393241.01 299830.36
400M LANE MARKER 54 DOABLE 3832/TO.W 749665.36 383243D.85 26986731 3832131.72 2MU.06
40011 LANE MARKER 6-7 000BUE 30.121731 MM MS29 3632458.12 2MM27 %1245692 7691187.16
400M LANE MARKER 74 DOUBLE 7632101.05 299716.1 3832453.76 28717.00 ]636164.51 209117.95
400M LANE MARKER 64 OOIINE 36706.1 201745.11 3832507.59 26745.12 30.1260637 29750.13
400M LANE MARKER 9.10 DOIBIE ]9325131 NOM20 383 M92 261179136 243297.53 78795.32
4001 LAME RIO SMGIE 393291Y.1 269816.41 3017324.61 299617.45
1 2 3
4
NOTES)
I. SEE PLANS FOR LOCATIONS OF STONE CHECK DAMS AND f STONE CHECK DAM
COORDINATES AND ELEVATION OF CONTROL POINT. TOP OF STONE
CONTROL POINT ELEVATION REPRESENTS THE MINIMUM CONTROL POINT
ELEVATION OF STONE ACROSS FULL MOTH OF DITCH. (SEE NOTE 11 1 DITCH BOTTOM
D 2. USE CLASS 1 OR CLASS 5 STONE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE 2 2
NI TH THE REOUIREYENTS FOUND IN ARTICLE 1042-1 OF THE 1F- 1 1
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.
3. FILTERFABRIC SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF PLACED STONE.
FILTER FABRIC (SEE NOTE 31
x SECTION B
N.T.S. 1 - A
0
FL
457 MIN. DITCH
1
(TYP. I
B
?
C 14 [ION CONTROL STONE SEE NOTE 2)
[
TOP OF STONE
CONTROL POINT
ISEE N07E 1)
C ?j FILTER FABRIC IS EE ROTE 31
STONE CHECK DAM
N.T.S.
GENERAL NOTE:
1. ALL D1IENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS 07HERVISE NOTED.
GROUND LINE
OR WOOD POST
FABRIC
t FILTER FABRIC SKIRT
SECTION A
N.T.S. 1
B
7.
A
I,UNa1KUL;IIUN ENTRANCE/ XIT
N.T.S.
NOTES:
1. THICKNESS OF CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 152111.
2. SEE SHEET G-M. VICINITY AND SITE LOCATION MAPS. FOR LOCATION OF
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.
1 2
NOTES,
1. FOR SILT FENCE SPECIFICATIONS. CONSTRUCTION. AND MAINTENANCE
REFER TO SECTION 6.62 OF THE CURRENT MORTH CAROLINA EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL
EROSION AND SEDIMENT ENT CI0IMOTROL ANDNOT DESESIGN MANUAL AND SHEET C-S15.
.
2. SILT FENCE TO RE INSTALLED AT THE LIMITS OF CLEARING
(SEE SHEET C-LAB. CLEARING LIMITS I.
3 4 5
1. 1
oi 11
s1. lij
ELEVATION
SILT FENCE
N.T.S.

' Final Environmental Assessment
For
' Construction and Operation of a
' Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range
In the Greater Sandy Run Area at
Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune,
North Carolina
n

C
Prepared for US Marine Corps
in accordance with
C??d 11 Marine Corps Order P5090.2A
pursuant to
? National Environmental
ENR ?? P???,?gR?olicy Act Section 102(2)(C)

ER-00-119
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
AND
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
' FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF
MULTI-PURPOSE MACHINE GUN RANGE
IN THE GREATER SANDY RUN AREA
MARINE CORPS BASE, CAMP LEJEUNE
ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Responsible Officer: Commanding Officer
Marine Corps Base
PSC Box 20004
Camp Lejeune, North Carolina 28542-0004
Point of Contact: Department of the Navy
Naval Facilities Engineering, Atlantic
Attn: Lisa Padgett, Code OPCEV6
6506 Hampton Blvd.
Norfolk, Virginia 23508-1278
[phone]
Lisa.paftett(i?navy.mil
January 2006
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
FOR
CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF
MULTI-PURPOSE MACHINE GUN RANGE
IN THE GREATER SANDY RUN AREA
MARINE CORPS BASE (MCB), CAMP LEJEUNE, NC
Pursuant to the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations (40 Code of Federal
Regulations [CFR] § 1500-1508) implementing procedural provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (42 USC § 4321 et seq.), the United States Marine Corps
(USMC) gives notice that an Environmental Assessment (EA) has been prepared. The
Marine Corps proposes to construct and operate a Multi-Purpose Machine Gun (MPMG)
Range within the Greater Sandy Run Area (GSRA) of Marine Corps Base (MCB), Camp
Lejeune, North Carolina. MCB Camp Lejeune needs to construct and operate the MPMG
range to provide the necessary training facilities to maintain combat readiness. Existing firing
ranges at MCB Camp Lejeune are inadequate and antiquated to support all of the 5.56 mm,
7.62 mm, .50-caliber and 40 mm live fire training requirements for both the School of
Infantry (SOI) and the II Marine Expeditionary Force (II MEF).
The purpose of this project is to provide:
• An adequate and realistic combat training range for machine gun teams and snipers.
• A range that would support live-fire and maneuvering of both ground and vehicle
mounted machine guns including firing lanes for "Vehicle Move and Shoot".
• Static and moving electronic targets that would provide performance feedback.
• Thermal image targets for the new machine gun thermal sights and sniper rifle thermal
sights.
The MPMG Range complex will provide facilities including a control tower, general
instruction building, ammunition breakdown building and covered mess. The MPMG range
complex also includes a vehicle holding area, Battle Site Zero area, a bivouac area, maneuver
areas, training areas, target emplacements, an emergency range shutdown system, telephone
distribution system, secondary power distribution system, data distribution system, and a
flagpole. Gravel roads will be constructed around the perimeter of the range to facilitate
security patrols, to serve as firebreaks, and to allow vehicle access for maintenance. Utilities
required will be tapped from existing utility lines within the GSRA.
The principal direction of fire on this range will be to the northwest into the center and
northern half of GSRA. The MPMG Range will consist of 10 firing lanes on a raised firing
berm, including 4 fighting holes, 2 vehicle-firing lanes, 2 defilade-firing positions, several
vehicle pads for firing vehicle-mounted guns, and a 10-meter Battle Sight Zero (BZO) range.
Vehicle firing will occur from vehicles with mounted machine guns, moving down range 400
meters. Surface Danger Zones (SDZ) will extend out in a fan-shape to a distance of 6,900
meters (22,638 ft). The range will have 32 targets in each lane, out to a distance of 1,200
meters (3,937 ft). The range will accommodate marksmanship training with M249, M240G,
M2.50 caliber and MK19 machine guns and M40A3 and M82A3 sniper rifles during day and
night time training exercises. The range is expected to be operational an average of 244 days

' per year with roughly one-third of the operations at night. Night operations involve the use of
pyrotechnics. Helicopters will be authorized to conduct door gunnery exercises from
altitudes below 152 meters (500 ft) above ground level with inert rounds.
' The Environmental Assessment analyzed the environmental effects of four alternatives: (1)
Construct Range at SR-8, (2) Construct Range at SR-8 West, (3) Construct Range between
SR-6 and SR-7 and (4) the No-Action Alternative. The preferred alternative is (1) Construct
' Range at site SR-8. SR-8 is a 121-hectare (300-acre) site located on the east side of GSRA
where the Clear Zone (CZ) for the MPMG Range will be located. Personnel will fire
northwest towards the center and northern half of the GSRA. In addition to the preferred
alternative at site SR-8, the No-Action Alternative was carried through the EA to represent the
baseline conditions for comparison. Alternatives (2) Construct Range at SR-8 West and (3)
Construct Range between SR-6 and SR-7 were eliminated from further consideration because
' of the potential off-base noise impacts on the community and land-use conflicts with other
ranges.
The construction and operation of the MPMG Range at SR-8 is the preferred alternative.
t Implementation of the preferred alternative will not result in any impacts to threatened or
endangered species, utilities, cultural resources, land use, traffic or safety. Construction
activities and range operations at the proposed SR-8 range will temporarily displace some
' species. Many displaced species are expected to recolonize the area after the construction
activities are complete and adapt to range operations. Soil impacts caused by construction
' and operation of the MPMG Range will be minor and temporary. A surface danger zone, or
range fan, measuring approximately 322 ha (800 ac) will be cleared of vegetation and timber.
It will be maintained in a low-growth state for operation of the range. This has the benefit of
reducing the potential for wildfire in this area. The proposed project area at SR-8 represents
' about 2 % of the total timber production area at GSRA as a whole, which does not represent a
large withdrawal of land from timber production. Base Forestry Section will harvest any
merchantable timber within the project area.
'
A wetland delineation of the project construction area was conducted and verified by the US
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Approximately 50 ha (124 ac) of the 121 ha (300 ac)
SR-8 site is classified as wetlands. Every effort will be made to avoid wetland impacts by
placing facilities, buildings, and gravel roads in upland areas when practicable. Construction
of the MPMG Range will require the grading and filling of approximately 29.66 ha (73.28 ac)
of wetlands. Unavoidable impacts to wetlands or waters of the U. S. will require coordination
and written approval from the USACE for a Section 404 Clean Water Act Permit, the N. C.
Division of Water Quality for a Section 401 Clean Water Act Water Quality Certification, and
the N. C. Division of Coastal Management for a Federal Consistency Determination.
Mitigation for the unavoidable wetlands impacts will be accomplished in the existing GSRA
Wetlands Mitigation Bank. Vegetative clearing will be performed mechanically.
' The construction of the proposed MPMG Range will disturb more than 2 ha (5 ac) of land and
therefore require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit. Other
required permits include but are not limited to a North Carolina Storm Water Permit and a
' State-approved erosion and sedimentation control plan.

2

The firing line of the range is proposed for location that is over 2,000 meters (6,500 fl, or 1.25
mi) from the nearest ofd base noise sensitive receptor. This allows the noise from the
proposed range to attenuate (i.e. become quieter) over the distance between the firing line and
off-base noise receptors, helping to mitigate any potential noise impacts beyond MCB Camp
Lejeune's boundaries. According to the noise models, all areas adjacent to the GSRA will
experience 65 dBA for small arms and 87 dBA for the M2.50 caliber machine gun. The
areas of Onslow County adjacent to the GSRA property line will experience no significant
change in noise levels, and noise associated with the proposed action is compatible with
existing land uses in the area. No noise impacts are predicted due to implementing the
proposed action.
Construction and operation of the proposed MPMG Range at site SR-8 will not affect
minority or low-income populations or children.
Construction at the proposed MPMG Range at site SR-8 will entail earth movement both
within the range and from off-site borrow quarries, which will cause minor impacts to air
quality from vehicle emissions and fugitive dust. These emissions will be short term and
minor. Fugitive dust control will be part of the construction plan.
Implementation of the proposed action will result in positive socioeconomic impacts from the
temporary increase in labor and materials demand for range construction; the permanent
addition of employees for range control and maintenance; and the regular, short-term
increases of military personnel in the local area training at the MPMG Range.
Based on information gathered during preparation of the EA, the USMC finds that the
proposed action to construct and operate the Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range in the
Greater Sandy Run Area will not significantly impact the human and natural environments,
and concludes that a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) is the appropriate outcome
for the EA. The EA addressing this action is on file and may be reviewed by interested
parties at: Commanding General, Consolidated Public Affairs Office, MCB Camp Lejeune,
North Carolina 28542-0004, Telephone: [phone].
Ali Z4., U(o
Date A. E. HODGES
Colonel, U. S. arine Corps
Commanding Officer
Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune

Prepared for
' Department of the Navy
U.S. Marine Corps
' In accordance with
Marine Corps Order P5090.2A
Pursuant to
' National Environmental
Policy Act Section 102(2) (C)
u
n
L

u

ER-00-119
Final Environmental Assessment
For
Construction and Operation of a
Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range
In the Greater Sandy Run Area at
Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune,
North Carolina
January 2006
Point of Contact:
Lisa Padgett
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Department of the Navy
Commander Naval Facilities Engineering Command Atlantic
6506 Hampton Blvd.
Norfolk, Virginia 23508-1278

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune ,
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1
The Marine Corps has prepared this environmental assessment (EA) pursuant to the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, the Council on Environmental Quality

(CEQ) regulations in 40 CFR Parts 1500-1508, and Marine Corps Order P5090.2A. '
S.1 Description of Proposed Action '
The US Marine Corps (USMC) proposes to construct and operate a Multi-Purpose Machine
Gun (MPMG) Range within the Greater Sandy Run Area (GSRA) of Marine Corps Base '

(MCB), Camp Lejeune, North Carolina.
MCB Camp Lejeune needs to construct and operate the MPMG range to provide the '
necessary facilities for Marine Corps as well as other military units to maintain their combat
readiness. Existing firing ranges at MCB Camp Lejeune are inadequate and antiquated to
support all of the 5.56 mm, 7.62 mm, .50-caliber and 40 mm live fire training requirements '
for both the School of Infantry (SOI) and the II Marine Expeditionary Force (II MEF).
The purpose of this project is to provide: '
• An adequate and realistic combat training range for machine gun teams and snipers.
• A range that would support live-fire and maneuvering of both ground and vehicle
mounted machine guns including firing lanes for "Vehicle Move and Shoot".
• Static and moving electronic targets that would provide performance feedback.
• Thermal image targets for the new machine gun thermal sights and sniper rifle
thermal sights.
The MPMG Range complex would provide facilities including a control tower, field service
head, operations/storage building, general instruction building, ammunition breakdown
building, covered bleacher enclosure, and covered mess. The MPMG range complex would
also include a vehicle holding area, Battle Site Zero area, a bivouac area, maneuver areas,
training areas, target emplacements, an emergency range shutdown system, telephone
distribution system, secondary power distribution system, data distribution system, and a
flagpole. Gravel roads would be constructed around the perimeter of the range to facilitate
security patrols, serve as firebreaks, and allow vehicle access for maintenance. Utilities '
required would be tapped from existing utility lines within the GSRA.
The principal direction of fire on this range would be to the northwest into the center and ,
northern half of GSRA. The MPMG Range would consist of 10 firing lanes on a raised
firing berm, including 4 fighting holes, 2 vehicle-firing lanes, 2 defilade-firing positions,
several vehicle pads for firing vehicle-mounted guns, and a 10-meter Battle Sight Zero ,
(BZO) range. Vehicle firing would occur from vehicles with mounted machine guns,
moving down range 400 meters. Surface Danger Zones (SDZ) would extend out in a fan-
shape to a distance of 6,900 in (22,638 ft). The range would have 32 targets in each lane,
out to a distance of 1,200 in (3,937 ft). The range would accommodate marksmanship ,
training with M249, M240G, M2 50ca1 and MK19 machine guns and M40A3 and M82A3
[FINAUJanuary 2006] ES-1 Executive Summary
,

?I

F

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
sniper rifles during day and night time training exercises. The range would be operational
an average of 244 days per year and roughly one-third of the operations would take place at
night. Night operations would involve the use of pyrotechnics. Helicopters would be
authorized to conduct door gunnery exercises from altitudes below 152 in (500 ft) above
ground level with inert rounds.
S.2 Alternatives Considered
The preferred alternative is to construct and operate a MPMG Range, MILCON P-034, at
site SR-8 in the Greater Sandy Run Area of MCB Camp Lejeune. SR-8 is a 121-hectare
(300-acre) site located on the east side of GSRA where the Clear Zone (CZ) for the MPMG
Range would be located. Personnel would fire northwest towards the center and northern
half of the GSRA.
In addition to the preferred alternative at site SR-8, the no-action alternative was carried
through this EA to represent the baseline conditions for comparison. This alternative would
not construct and operate an MPMG range (P-034). This would have an impact on MCB
Camp Lejeune's ability to offer training to military personnel. Marines and operating forces
would have to use existing, antiquated and inadequate ranges at MCB Camp Lejeune to train
with their M249, M240G, M2 50cal and MK19 machine guns and M40A3 and M82A3
sniper rifles. Combat readiness and live fire proficiency would continue to be negatively
impacted by the lack of adequate ranges for machine gun teams if the no-action alternative is
selected.
S.3 Environmental Impacts of Proposed Action
The construction and operation of the MPMG Range at SR-8 would not result in any
impacts to threatened or endangered species, floodplains, utilities, cultural resources, land
use, traffic or safety.
Construction of the MPMG Range would impact vegetation and soils in the following ways.
First, stems of shrubs and trees within the entire 322 ha (800 ac) range fan would be cut by
mechanical means. Second, removal of remaining stems and roots by grubbing and
stumping with machinery would be done only within the 121 ha (300 ac) CZ. The CZ is the
121 ha (300 ac) portion contained within the 322 ha (800 ac) range fan. Then site
preparation including grading and filling would be done within the CZ to support
construction of buildings, structures, targetry, and other improvements. Areas not built upon
would be seeded with lawn type grasses.
Soil impacts due to the operation of the MPMG Range would be minor, and MCB Camp
Lejeune's soil conservation program would further reduce any effects. The portion of the
range fan not in the CZ would not be grubbed and stumped, but would be maintained in a
low-growth state. The maintenance of vegetation in an early successional stage at site SR-8
would not cause a significant change in vegetation or community type within the area and
would reduce the fire potential in this area. Impacts to vegetation due to range usage would
[FINAL/ January 2006] ES-2 Executive Summary
u
Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
be negligible. The entire 16,592 ha (41,000 ac) of GSRA contains approximately 14,164 ha
(35,000 ac) of timber plots. The proposed project area of 322 ha (800 ac) at SR-8 represents
about 2 % of the total timber production area at GSRA as a whole, which does not represent
a large withdrawal of land from timber production.
A wetland delineation of the project construction area was conducted and verified by the
USACE. Approximately 50 ha (124 ac) (41.3 %) of the 121 ha (300 ac) SR-8 site is
classified as wetlands (Geo-Marine, Inc. 2005). Every effort would be made to avoid
wetland impacts by placing facilities, buildings, targets, and gravel roads in upland areas
when practicable. Construction of the MPMG Range would require the grading and filling
of approximately 29.66 ha (73.28 ac) of wetlands. A Section 404 Permit from the USACE,
Federal Consistency Determination Concurrence and a North Carolina Section 401
Certification would be required. Vegetative clearing would be performed mechanically.
Mitigation for the unavoidable wetland impacts would be accomplished in the GSRA
Wetlands Mitigation Bank.
Construction activities at the proposed SR-8 range would temporarily displace some species.
Most misplaced species would be expected to recolonize the area after the construction
activities are complete. Operation of the MPMG Range would mean an increase in human
presence and the periodic intense use of military hardware and weapons. Range operation
may drive some wildlife from the CZ of the MPMG Range into other suitable habitat within
the GSRA. The CZ of the MPMG Range represents only a small proportion (about 0.7%) of
the natural habitat within the GSRA. Most animals, as noted on other ranges, are expected
to adapt and take up residence within the range. There would be no alteration of habitat or
disruption of natural areas encompassed by the SDZ. Therefore, range operations are not
expected to impact wildlife within the MPMG Range SDZ, and only minor impacts would
occur to wildlife within the CZ.
The construction of the proposed MPMG Range would disturb more than 2 ha (5 ac) of land
and would require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit for
storm water. Because Onslow County is considered a coastal county in North Carolina,
additional requirements may apply such as a State Stormwater Certificate and an approved
sedimentation control plan.
The proposed MPMG Range (P-034) could impact the noise environment due to noise from
the frequent firing of multiple machine guns. However, the firing line of the range would be
located over 2,000 in (6,500 ft, or 1.25 mi) from the nearest off-base noise sensitive
receptor. This would allow the noise from the proposed range to attenuate (i.e. become
quieter) over the distance between the firing line and off-base noise receptors, helping to
mitigate any potential noise impacts beyond MCB Camp Lejeune's boundaries.
According to the noise models, all areas adjacent to the GSRA would experience 65 dBA for
small arms and 87 dBA for the M2.50 caliber machine gun. The areas of Onslow County
adjacent to the GSRA property line would experience no significant change in noise levels,
and noise associated with the proposed action is compatible with existing land uses in the
area. No noise impacts are predicted due to implementing the proposed action.
[FINAL/ January 2006] ES-3 Executive Summary

H
Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
Within the area of the proposed MPMG Range site, SR-8, approximately 43 ha (107 ac) are
currently in timber production with mostly loblolly pine, approximately 25-60 years of age.
The construction of the MPMG Range would include the clearing of approximately 322 ha
(800 ac) of merchantable timber (approximately 25 year old pine plantations) within the
proposed range fan. The timber area at SR-8 represents only 2 % of the total timber
production area at GSRA, which does not represent a major withdrawal of land from timber
production. Furthermore, the development of ranges for military training is the primary
purpose of the GSRA (LANTDIV 1991).
Construction at the proposed MPMG Range at site SR-8 would entail earth movement both
within the range and possibly from off-site borrow quarries, which would cause minor
impacts to air quality from vehicle emissions and fugitive dust. These emissions would be
' short term and minor. Fugitive dust control would be mitigated as part of the construction
plan.
Emissions from wildland fire are a concern and could have negative impacts to air quality if
the fire burned for extended time periods, and adverse weather conditions are present.
Wildland fire control is addressed in MCB Camp Lejeune's Integrated Natural Resources
' Management Plan (INRMP 2001) and in range specific plans that would be developed for
the proposed MPMG Range (P-034).
' The proposed action would result in positive socioeconomic impacts from the temporary
increase in labor and materials demand for range construction; the permanent addition of
employees for range control and maintenance; and the regular, short-term increases of
' military personnel in the local area training at the MPMG Range.
' SA Mitigation

1
n

MCB Camp Lejeune would implement the following measures during the construction and
operation of the proposed MPMG Range (P-034):
• Wetlands would be avoided when possible. There would be some impacts to
wetlands caused by the clearing, grubbing, and reseeding with lawn type grasses. If
it is necessary to fill wetlands, wetland permits would be obtained and any mitigation
required by the permits would be implemented. Wetlands that must be filled would
be compensated for with credits from the GSRA Wetland Mitigation Bank as
negotiated with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Department
of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR divisions of Coastal Management
and Water Quality) during the permitting process.
• State-approved erosion and sedimentation control plans would be obtained if,
necessary for any construction activities.
[FINAL/ January 2006] ES-4 Executive Summary

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
• If any unanticipated artifacts or other cultural resources are encountered during
construction, work would cease and the MCB Camp Lejeune Environmental
Management Division would be contacted to investigate and identify additional
archaeological survey requirements and mitigation measures that might be needed.
• Threatened and endangered species and their habitat would be avoided. Consultation
with USFWS would be conducted if there were any chance to affect any federally
listed threatened or endangered species.
• The project site will be delineated with markings, flagging, or other suitable material
prior to the beginning of construction to avoid impacting resources outside of the
immediate project footprint.
• Permanent signage would be placed around the proposed MPMG Range to identify
sensitive resource areas to avoid impacting these areas during operation and
maintenance activities.
• No weapons, chemicals, or petroleum products would be stored on-site.
Ammunition would not be permanently stored at the MPMG Range, but would be
distributed from the ammunition breakdown building during training events. This
would avoid potential safety and environmental impacts in the area associated with
permanently storing ordnance.
Although not triggered by the proposed action evaluated in this EA, MCB Camp Lejeune is
actively pursuing measures to prevent and/or mitigate encroachment by fixture residential
development and other land uses incompatible with its ranges. These measures include:
• On-going range management planning activities to effectively and efficiently utilize
and maintain existing range assets to meet the military mission.
• Participation in a Joint Land Use Study (JLUS) with Onslow County. The study will
identify key areas around the installation boundaries with the potential for
incompatible development. Onslow County could then use the findings of this study
to develop zoning restrictions, which would limit incompatible development.
• Partnering with other interested stakeholders (e.g., state and federal land managers,
conservation organizations and community groups) to promote sustainable land use
and ecosystem conservation in encroachment-sensitive areas around the installation.
MCB Camp Lejeune will then update the Integrated Natural Resource Management
Plan (INRMP).
[FINAL/ January 2006] ES-5 Executive Summary

17
L
Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 Purpose and Need 1-1
1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1-1
1.2 Purpose and Need .......................................................................................................1-1
1.3 Greater Sandy Run Area .............................................................................................1-2
1.3.1 Description ...................................................................................................1-2
1.3.2 Acquisition Environmental Review Process ................................................ 1-4
1.3.3 Development ................................................................................................1-4
1.3.4 Development Constraints ............................................................................. 1-4
1.4 The Environmental Review Process .............................................................................1-5
1.5 Regulatory Compliance ................................................................................................1-6
2 Proposed Action and Alternatives 2-1
2.1 Siting Criteria .............................................................................................................. 2-1
2.2 Alternatives ................................................................................................................. 2-2
2.2.1 Construct Range at SR-8 (Proposed Action) ................................................ 2-2
2.2.1.1 Facilities ........................................................................................ 2-2
2.2.1.2 Operations ..................................................................................... 2-4
2.2.2 Alternatives Considered But Eliminated ...................................................... 2-5
2.2.2.1 Construct Range at Site SR-8 West .............................................. 2-5
2.2.2.2 Construct Range between SR-6 and SR-7 .................................... 2-5
2.2.3 No-Action Alternative ...................................................................................... 2-5
2.3 Summary of Environmental Effects of Alternatives ................................................... 2-6
3 Affected Environment 3-1
3.1 ....................................................................................................
Land Use ................ 3-1
3. 1.1 Zoning ...........................................................................................................3-1
3.1.2 Coastal Zone Management ........................................................................... 3-1
3.2 Socioeconomics .......................................................................................................... 3-2
3.3 Environmental Justice ................................................................................................. 3-2
3.4 Infrastructure and Community Facilities Services ...................................................... 3-3
3.4.1 Transportation ..............................................................................................3-3
3.4.2 Utilities .........................................................................................................3-3
3.4.2.1 Electricity .....................................................................................3-3
3.4.2.2 Telephone/Communications ........................................................ 3-4
3.4.2.3 Water ............................................................................................3-4
3.4.2.4 Wastewater ...................................................................................3-4
3.5 Air Quality ................................................................................................................ 3-4
3.6 Noise ......................................................................................................................... 3-5
3.6.1 Noise Descriptors ......................................................................................... 3-5
3.6.2 Existing Noise Levels .................................................................................. 3-6
3.7 Cultural Resources .....................................................................................................3-8
3.8 Natural Resources ...................................................................................................... 3-9
3.8.1 Topography and Soils .................................................................................. 3-9
3.8.2 Vegetation and Natural Communities .......................................................... 3-9
3.8.3 Forest Management .................................................................................... 3-10
[FINAU January 2006]
i

C
Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
3.8.3.1 Timber Management ................................................................ 3-10
3.8.3.2 Wildland Fire ........................................................................... 3-11
3.8.4 Wildlife .................................................................................................... 3-11
3.8.4.1 Non-Game Species ...................................................................3-11
3.8.4.2 Game Species ............... ............................................................3-12
3.8.5 Threatened and Endangered Species ....................................................... 3-12
3.8.5.1 Animals .................................................................................... 3-14
3.8.5.2 Plants ........................................................................................3-14
3.8.6 Floodplains ...............................................................................................3-15
3.9 Water Resources ................................................................................................... 3-15
3.9.1 Surface Water ...........................................................................................3-15
3.9.2 Groundwater ............................................................................................ 3-16
3.9.3 Wetlands .................................................................................................. 3-16
3.10 Hazardous Materials Management ....................................................................... 3-19
3. 10.1 Munitions ................................................................................................. 3-19
3.11 Safety .................................................................................................................... 3-19
3.11.1 Surface Danger Zones and Clear Zones .................................................. 3-20
3.11.2 Restricted Airspace .................................................................................3-20
4 Environmental Consequences 4-1
4.1 Land Use ............................................................................................................... ..4-1
4.1.1 Zoning ..................................................................................................... .. 4-1
4.1.1.1 Construct Range at SR-8 .......................................................... ..4-1
4.1.1.2 No-Action Alternative ............................................................. .. 4-1
4.1.2 Coastal Zone Management ..................................................................... ..4-1
4.1.2.1 Construct Range at SR-8 .......................................................... .. 4-1
4.1.2.2 No-Action Alternative ............................................................. .. 4-2
4.2 Socioeconomics ............................. ...................................................................... .. 4-2
4.2.1 Construct Range at SR-8 ........................................................................ .. 4-2
4.2.2 No-Action Alternative ........................................................................... .. 4-3
4.3 Environmental Justice .......................................................................................... ..4-3
4.3.1 Construct Range at SR-8 ........................................................................ .. 4-3
4.3.2 No-Action Alternative ........................................................................... .. 4-3
4.4 Infrastructure and Community Facilities Services ............................................... .. 4-3
4.4.1 Transportation ........................................................................................ .. 4-3
4.4.1.1 Construct Range at SR-8 ........................................................ .. 4-4
4.4.1.2 No-Action Alternative ........................................................... .. 4-4
4.4.2 Utilities ................................................................................................... ..4-4
4.4.2.1 Construct Range at SR-8 ........................................................ .. 4-4
4.4.2.2 No-Action Alternative ........................................................... .. 4-5
4.5 Air Quality ........................................................................................................... .. 4-5
4.5.1 Construct Range at SR-8 ........................................................................ .. 4-5
4.5.2 No-Action Alternative ........................................................................... .. 4-6
4.6 Noise .................................................................................................................... .. 4-6
4.6.1 Construct Range at SR-8 ........................................................................ .. 4-6
4.6.2 No-Action Alternative ........................................................................... .. 4-8
4.7 Cultural Resources .............................................................................................. 4-10
[FINAL/ January 2006] ii

1

I?

1

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
4.7.1 Construct Range at SR-8 ....................................................................... 4-10
4.7.2 No-Action Alternative .......................................................................... 4-10
4.8 Natural Resources ............................................................................................... 4-10
4.8.1 Topography and Soils ........................................................................... 4-10
4.8.1.1 Construct Range at SR-8 ....................................................... 4-11
4.8.1.2 No-Action Alternative .......................................................... 4-11
4.8.2 Vegetation and Natural Communities ................................................... 4-11
4.8.2.1 Construct Range at SR-8 ....................................................... 4-12
4.8.2.2 No-Action Alternative .......................................................... 4-12
4.8.3 Forest Management .............................................................................. 4-12
4.8.3.1 Timber Management ............................................................. 4-12
4.8.3.1.1 Construct Range at SR-8 .................................... 4-12
4.8.3.1.2 No-Action Alternative ....................................... 4-13
4.8.3.2 Wildland Fire ........................................................................ 4-13
4.8.3.2.1 Construct Range at SR-8 .................................... 4-13
4.8.3.2.2 No-Action Alternative ....................................... 4-14
4.8.4 Wildlife ................................................................................................. 4-14
4.8.4.1 Construct Range at SR-8 ....................................................... 4-14
4.8.4.2 No-Action Alternative .......................................................... 4-15
4.8.5 Threatened and Endangered Species ................................................... 4-15
4.8.5.1 Construct Range at SR-8 ....................................................... 4-15
4.8.5.2 No-Action Alternative .......................................................... 4-17
4.8.6 Floodplains ........................................................................................... 4-17
4.8.6.1 Construct Range at SR-8 ...................................................... 4-17
4.8.6.2 No-Action Alternative ......................................................... 4-17
4.9 Water Resources ................................................................................................ 4-18
4.9.1 Construct Range at SR-8 ...................................................................... 4-18
4.9.2 No-Action Alternative ......................................................................... 4-18
4.9.3 Wetlands .............................................................................................. 4-19
4.9.3.1 Construct Range at SR-8 ..................................................... 4-19
4.9.3.2 No-Action Alternative ........................................................ 4-20
4.10 Hazardous Materials Management .................................................................. 4-21
4.10.1 Construct Range at SR-8 ..................................................................... 4-21
4.10.2 No-Action Alternative ........................................................................ 4-21
4.11 Safety ............................................................................................................... 4-22
4.11.1 Construct Range at SR-8 ..................................................................... 4-22
4.11.2 No-Action Alternative ........................................................................ 4-22
4.12 Cumulative Impacts ......................................................................................... 4-22
4.12.1 Weapons-Related Noise ...................................................................... 4-23
4.12.2 Wetlands ............................................................................................. 4-24
4.13 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts ......................................................................... 4-24
4.14 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitments of Resources .............................. 4-25
4.15 Relationship between Local Short-Term Uses of the Environment and the
Enhancement of Long-Term Productivity .................................................. 4-25
4.16 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................................ 4-25
[FINAU January 2006]
iii

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune '
5 References 5-1
6 List of Preparers 6-1
Appendix A: Letter from North Carolina SHPO, Aug 2005 ......................................................... A
Appendix B: Federal and State Listed Species .............................................................................B
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1-1 Location of MCB Camp Lejeune ...............................................................................1-3
Figure 2-1 Diagrammatic layout of the proposed MPMG Range ................................................2-2
Figure 2-2 Location of MPMG Range in relation to Ranges west of New River ....................... 2-3
Figure 3-1 CNDL Noise Contours (June 2005) ........................................................................... 3-8
Figure 3-2 Cowardin Wetland Classes at SR8 ........................................................................... 3-18
Figure 4-1 A-weighted DNL noise contours modeled for the proposed MPMG Range .............4-9
Figure 4-2 MPMG Range Design with the Jurisdictional Wetlands Delineation at SR-8......... 4-20
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1 Summary of environmental effects for the .................................................................. 2-6
Table 3-1 Noise zones and land use guidelines ........................................................................... 3-6
Table 3-2 Federally listed threatened and endangered species aboard MCB Camp Lejeune.... 3-13
Table 4-1 Predicted Noise Levels for 5.56mm weapon ............................................................... 4-7
Table 4-2 Predicted Noise Levels for 7.62mm weapon ............................................................... 4-8
Table 4-3 Predicted Noise Levels for .50 Cal weapon, Live Fire ............................................... 4-8
Table 4-4 Summary of Wetlands Disturbed for Construction .................................................. 4-20
[FINAL/ January 2006] iv

w
I Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB. Camp Lejeune

7- I1

J

1

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Acronym and
Abbreviation
Definition
ac Acre
ADNL "X'-weighted Day-Night Noise Level
AEC Areas of Environmental Concern
AGL Automatic Grenade Launcher MK19 Grenade Machine Gun
BASH Bird Air Strike Hazard
BO Base Order
BZO Battle Sight Zero
CAA Clean Air Act
CAMA Coastal Area Management Act
CDNL "C"-weighted Day-Night Noise Level
CEQ Council on Environmental Quality
CERL US Arm Construction Engineering Research Laboratory
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CHPPM U.S. Arm Center Health Promotion and Preventative Medicine
CWA Clean Water Act
CZ Clear Zone
CZMA Coastal Zone Management Act
dB Decibels
dBA "A"-weighted Decibels
dBC "C"-weighted Decibels
DNL Average Day-Night Noise Level
EA Environmental Assessment
EIS Environmental Impact Statement
EIWG Environmental Impact Working Group
EMD Environmental Management Division
EO Executive Order
FEIS Final Environmental Impact Statement
FMP Forest Management Program
FONSI Finding of No Significant Impact
ft Feet
GSRA Greater Sand Run Area
ha Hectare
II MEF Second Marine Expeditionary Force
INRMP Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan
IPBC Infan Platoon Battle Course
PC International Paper Company
Individual Training Standards
JLUS Joint Land Use Stud
LANTDIV Atlantic Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, presently
known as NAVFAC Atlantic
LATAR Land and Training Area Requirements Stud
[FINAUJanuary 2006] v

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
LFOC Landing Forces Operations Center
m Meter
M2 Square Meters
WAS Marine Corps Air Station
MCB Marine Corps Base
MCO Marine Corps Order
MEF Marine Expeditionary Force
METL Mission Essential Task Lists
m d Million gallons per day
MILCON Milita Construction
mld Million liters per day
mm Millimeters
MOUT Military Operations in Urban Terrain
MPMG Multi-Purpose Machine Gun
NAA S National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NAVFAC
Atlantic Naval Facilities Engineering Command Atlantic, formerly known as
LANTDIV
NCDERN North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
NEPA National Environmental Policy Act
NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service
NPDES National Pollution Discharge Elimination System
NRHP National Register of Historic Places
RCMP Range Complex Management Plan
RCRA Resources Conservation and Recovery Act
RCUZ Rana Compatible Use Zone
RCW Red-Cockaded Woodpecker
RETS Remote Engagement Targeting System
RLL Rough- eaved Loosestrife
ROD Record of Decision
ROD Record of Decision
SARNAM Small Arms Rana Noise Assessment Model
SASR Special Application Scope Rifle M82A3 sniper rifle
SAW Squad Automatic Weapon M249
SDZ Surface Danger Zone
SHPO State Historic Preservation Officer
SOI School of Infantry
SOP Standard Operating Procedure
T&R Training and Readiness Manual
USACE United States Arm Corps of Engineers
USACHPPM U.S. Arm Center Health Promotion and Preventative Medicine
USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service
WWTP Wastewater Treatment Plant
[FINAL/ January 2006] vi

J

[l

0

C

R
fl
P

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
1 PURPOSE AND NEED
1.1 Introduction
This environmental assessment (EA) analyzes the potential impacts of the Marine Corps at
MCB Camp Lejeune constructing and operating a Multi-Purpose Machine Gun (MPMG)
range, Military Construction Project (MILCON) P-034. This range would be capable of
supporting live fire and maneuver training requirements of the School of Infantry (SOI) and
II Marine Expeditionary Force (II MEF) using 5.56 mm, 7.62 mm,.50-caliber and 40 mm
weapons. A full description of the proposed action is presented in Chapter 2 Proposed
Action and Alternatives. If approved, this range would begin construction in the Greater
Sandy Run Area of MCB Camp Lejeune in FY2006.
The Marine Corps Base (MCB) Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, encompasses Camp
Lejeune, Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) New River, and the Greater Sandy Run Area
(GSRA). The 61,917-hectare (ha) [153,000-acre (ac)] military complex is located in
Onslow County, North Carolina (see Figure 1-1). MCB Camp Lejeune is home to the II
Marine Expeditionary Force, serves as a major East Coast training site for the United States
Marine Corps (USMC), and is headquarters for a number of Marine Corps commands.
1.2 Purpose and Need
MCB Camp Lejeune needs to construct and operate the MPMG range to provide the
necessary facilities for the SOI, II MEF Marines and other military units to maintain their
combat readiness. The Land and Training Area Requirements Study (LATAR) (MCB Camp
Lejeune 1988) and the Range Transformation Plan for 2020 (MCB Camp Lejeune 2001b)
identified training facility deficiencies at MCB Camp Lejeune. Namely, firing ranges and
existing land for maneuvering were inadequate to support all of the 5.56 mm, 7.62 mm, and
.50-caliber machine gun live fire and maneuver training requirements for the SOI and II
MEF operating forces. Specifically, ranges are open fields with encroaching vegetation,
debris, and erosion problems. Targets are non-existent or inappropriate, and units often
have to bring their own targets during training sessions (MCB Camp Lejeune 2001b).
Currently, .50-caliber machine gun qualification
training cannot be accomplished because the existing
ranges are too short and targets are not the correct
distance or the correct type to meet the training
requirements. In addition, current range use requires
closing roads and the Intracoastal Waterway while
live-fire training is being conducted. Machine gun
teams and crews do not receive the performance
feedback provided by Electronic Target System, and
the training does not satisfy all the SOI and II MEF
training requirements, Individual Training
Standards (ITS), Mission Essential Task Lists
[FINAUJanuary 2006] 1-1
A Marine aims a.50 cal machine gun.
Purpose and Need

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
(METL), and the Training and Readiness (T&R) Manual.
The purpose of this project is to provide:
• An adequate and realistic combat training range for Marine Corps machine gun and
sniper teams;
• A range that would support live-fire and maneuvering of both ground and vehicle
mounted machine guns;
• A range that would be equipped with static and moving electronic targets that would
provide performance feedback to measure the accuracy of the machine gun team and
the overall effectiveness of the training exercise.
• A range that would provide thermal image targets for the new machine gun sights
and sniper training.
1.3 Greater Sandy Run Area
Because of the land and training area deficiencies identified in the late 1980's, MCB Camp
Lejeune officials began to examine alternative solutions to rectify the situation. Eventually,
it was determined that acquisition of a contiguous area of land was the best alternative to
address the training needs of MCB Camp Lejeune. Consequently, the Federal Government
purchased a 16,592 ha (41,000 ac) tract of land, known as the Greater Sandy Run Area
(GSRA) for MCB Camp Lejeune in 1992.
The development goal for the GSRA, as established in the original Greater Sandy Run
Master Development Plan (EDAW, Inc. 1994) for the property, is to create the highest
quality mission responsive training area in support of training activities at MCB Camp
Lejeune while preserving and enhancing the ecology of the GSRA.
1.3.1 Description
The GSRA is located adjacent to the western boundary of the Mainside of MCB Camp
Lejeune, separated by US Highway 17. State Road 50 bounds the GSRA on the southwest
and west, and Padgett, Haws Run, Dawson Cabin, and High Hill Roads bound the property
to the north, excluding some out parcels along the northern and western perimeter.
The GSRA is dominated by a series of pine plantations that are at various stages of
development. Prior to acquisition by the USMC these plantations were routinely planted,
managed, and harvested by International Paper Company, who owned/controlled 14,771 ha
(36,500 ac) of the property for about 45 years.
The GSRA also includes a former World War II Army Training facility at Camp Davis,
located at the southern end near the Town of Holly Ridge. Abandonment of Camp Davis by
the Army led to the removal of all support facilities, with the exception of two runways.
The runways have been used for some years by Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) New
River for helicopter training and will continue to be used for this purpose.
[FINAUJanuary 2006] 1-2 Purpose and Need

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
Location of Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune
Elizabeth C?i
3
Rocky ount Q
04 CD I'm
se d '?
Raleigh
Greenville ?
shi gton
a
lt?
4 a?'
? IGnston 70 ? n
Bem
G
Jacksoroville
1
cape F-
.. G
L"
City
`
t Sooads Ferry
y Ridge y?
taville Beach n a 'v
Q?
-?-? NCB
Sc
* Site Location 0 20 40 60 Mike 1N
0 20 4000 80 Kkxn bra A
rrr? )'yV{'1
Figure 1-1
Figure 1-1 Location of MCB Camp Lejeune, North Carolina.
?S
0
e ?t0
[FINAU January 2006]
1-3
Purpose and Need

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune I
Three westward flowing creeks, along with
adjacent hardwood swamp forests, dissect
the upland forests. Two expansive pocosin
wetlands occur within the interior of the
GSRA. Prior to acquisition by the Marine
Corps, these two pocosins were altered by
International Paper Company using a series
of drainage ditches.
1.3.2 Acquisition
Environmental Review Process
The Final Environmental Impact Statement
for the Proposed Expansion and
Realignment of Marine Corps Base, Camp
Lejeune (GSRA Acquisition FEIS) was
completed in May 1991 (Naval Facilities
Engineering Command, Atlantic Division [LANTDIV] 1991). The Record of Decision
(ROD) was published in the Federal Register on 3 October 1991. The ROD discussed the
planned management and use of the GSRA, and reviewed the expected environmental and
socioeconomic impacts of the Marine Corps' acquisition, development, and use of the
property. Although the GSRA Acquisition FEIS discussed generalized impacts of the
GSRA's development and use, the need to perform further enviromnental review of
"specific proposals to site and operate maneuver areas, firing ranges, weapons systems, and
impact areas" as they are developed was recognized in the ROD (LANTDIV 1991).
1.3.3 Development
Development-to-date at the GSRA consists of. the Multi-Purpose Training range at SR-7;
the Multi-Purpose Range Complex at SR-10; the Infantry Platoon Battle Course at SR-6;
and a Pistol Range at SR-11. SR-10 and SR-7 are designed to train both infantry and
armored vehicles and crews, separately or simultaneously maneuvering and firing as they
move downrange. As a result, both ranges have a considerable amount of maneuver trails,
multiple defilade firing-positions, and electronically operated moving target systems built
into the range. SR-6 is designed to train Marines and other operating infantry forces in
maneuvering down range, engaging targets as they move. SR-11 is a bullet trapped pistol
range for training with small arms. All the ranges, with the exception of SR-11, incorporate
the Remote Engagement Targeting System (RETS), which enables remote electronic
reporting of firing results. All ranges include multiple communications systems linked to a
central range control facility located in the Range Control (building 54 Mainside).
Additionally, many infrastructure projects have been completed in the GSRA including
construction of roads, utility lines, helicopter landing zones, and observation towers.
1.3.4 Development Constraints
A number of development constraints exist at the GSRA, which will affect its development
as an additional training area for MCB Camp Lejeune. These include:
[FINAU January 2006] 1-4 Purpose and Need
t

1?

Monoculture pine stands, scrub-shrub and pocosin
wetlands typify the location for the proposed
MPMG Range.

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
• Over 50% of the GSRA property is categorized as jurisdictional wetlands under the
authority of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE);
• Between 75-80% of the GSRA property contains hydric soils which are typically
wet, particularly during the winter months, and generally not suitable for building or
road construction;
• Federally-listed endangered plant species (rough-leafed loosestrife and pond berry)
are located on portions of the GSRA;
The location of wetlands, in particular, has influenced the design and construction of several
of the ranges at the GSRA and further studies may influence the siting of future ranges. A
wetlands "mitigation bank" has been established at the GSRA to provide an area for
restoring wetlands to the GSRA at a ratio in proportion to the extent of wetlands being
impacted by the proposed development.
1.4 The Environmental Review Process

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 requires consideration of the
environmental impacts of major federal actions. Detailed environmental impact statements
(EISs) must be prepared for those major federal actions with the potential to significantly
affect the quality of the human environment. Environmental Assessments (EAs) are concise
public documents that provide evidence and analysis for determining whether to prepare an
EIS or a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI), and to aid in an agency's compliance
' with NEPA when an EIS is not required.
MCB Camp Lejeune's Environmental Impact Working Group (EIWG) reviewed the
proposed action on 28 September 2000. The EIWG recommended that an EA be prepared
to satisfy NEPA requirements because of concerns with noise, threatened and endangered
species, wetlands, loss of habitat, and loss of forestland. According to Marine Corps Order
(MCO) P5090.2A, an EA is required for such a proposal because it meets the NEPA
threshold, but is not included on the list of categorical exclusions.
This EA has been prepared pursuant to NEPA and the following NEPA implementation
regulations and guidelines:
• The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations as contained in 40 Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) Parts 1500 to 1508, which direct federal agencies on
how to implement the provisions of NEPA.
• MCO P5090.2A, which documents the USMC's internal operating instructions on
how it implements the provisions of NEPA.
• Base Order 11000.1D, which outlines Camp Lejeune's environmental impact review
procedures.
This EA addresses the impacts of the three potential decisions available to the Base
Commander
namely to:
,

[FINAUJanuary 2006] 1-5 Purpose and Need
t
Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
• Approve the MPMG Range at site SR-8 in the GSRA at MCB Camp Lejeune
(preferred alternative).
• Approve the proposed action with modification
• Disapprove the proposed action.
If approved, the construction of the MPMG Range (P-034) would begin in FY2006.
1.5 Regulatory Compliance
Permits for the construction and operation of the MPMG range may include:
• North Carolina Erosion and Sedimentation Control plans.
• North Carolina storm water certifications.
• North Carolina Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) Federal Consistency.
• North Carolina Water Quality (Section 401) permits.
• U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (Section 404) permits.
• U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Threatened and Endangered Species (Section 7)
Consultation.
MCB Camp Lejeune environmental staff would conduct the necessary regulatory
consultations and obtain the appropriate permits/approvals prior to construction.
[FINALI January 2006] 1-6 Purpose and Need
Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
2 PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES
The CEQ Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act establish a number of policies for federal agencies, including
"using the NEPA process to identify and assess the reasonable alternatives to the proposed
action that would avoid or minimize adverse effects of these actions on the quality of the
human environment (40 CFR 1500.2 (e))." This chapter describes the possible alternatives
available to the decision-maker, including the proposed action, and summarizes the
environmental impacts of those alternatives.

2.1 Siting Criteria
Since the Greater Sandy Run Area (GSRA) Acquisition FEIS and ROD were published in
1991, more wetlands and threatened and endangered species have been discovered. The
competing land uses, the road network, surface danger zones and environmental resources
have lead to even greater constraints on the development of the land. Additionally, noise
affects on citizens in communities located adjacent to MCB Camp Lejeune's property line is
a concern. for the Base.
With these factors in mind, as well as criteria derived from the Purpose and Need (see
Section 1.2), several evaluation criteria were developed to find sites for the placement of the
MPMG range:

J

Satisfy training mission requirements including:
o Accommodate static marksmanship training and sniper training during daytime
and nighttime training exercises.
o Accommodate machine gun training from moving and stationary vehicles during
daytime and nighttime training exercises.
o Support the frequency and duration of training exercises to meet the full training
mission profile.
o Encompass all ITS, METL, and T&R Manual training standards for all machine
guns and sniper rifles.
Minimize land use conflicts between all GSRA ranges
o Ensure a surface danger zone (SDZ) from one range does not overlap the firing
line or target area of another range
o Accommodate independent use of ranges to maximize training and maintenance
opportunities at GSRA.
o Accommodate the movement of vehicular traffic on GSRA road network.
Avoid or minimize impacts to natural resources especially wetlands and threatened and
endangered species.
o Consider topographical land features and wetlands surveys in the placement of
range infrastructure, approximately 320 targets, and gravel roads.
Minimize noise impacts to the surrounding community.
[FINAU January 2005]
2-1
Purpose and Need
r-1

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune I
2.2 Alternatives
Although the GSRA Master Development Plan Update (EDAW, Inc. 1998) described siting
of ranges for this area, it was recognized that examining alternative locations for the MPMG
Range placement was still warranted.
2.2.1 Construct Range at SR-8 (Proposed Action)
2.2.1.1 Facilities
The MPMG Range would consist of 10 firing-positions/lanes on a raised firing line (3.0-4.6
in [ 10-15 ft] berm), including 4 fighting holes, 2 defilade-firing positions, 2 vehicle firing
lanes, several vehicle pads for firing vehicle-mounted guns, and a 10-meter Battle Sight
Zero (BZO) range. The range would have 32 targets in each lane, some being double
targets, for a total of 320 Stationary Infantry Targets out to a distance of 1,200 in (3,937 ft)
(see Figure 2-1). The area immediately surrounding the targets would be maintained as
mowable grass areas using standard vegetation removal practices (i.e. mowing, herbicides,
weed trimming). The proposed action alternative would construct and operate a MPMG
Range, MILCON P-034, at site SR-8 in the GSRA at MCB Camp Lejeune. SR-8 is a 121 ha
(300 ac) site located on the east side of GSRA where the Clear Zone (CZ) for the MPMG
Range would be located. This site was originally referred to as SR-9 in the GRSA Master
Plan (1994, 1998). Personnel would fire northwest towards the center and northern half of
the GSRA (see Figure 2-2).
RLL
Figure 2-1 Diagrammatic layout of the proposed MPMG Range.
[FINAL/ January 2005] 2-2 Purpose and Need

MULTIPURPOSE MACHINEGUN RANGE i

s

J

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
3
p = u¢i m
s ? ? n
8
0 N
°a
? ?I ?t it E
m?
"J
N
'J
z
r.
i
r,
v
G
1
r.
rt
i
Z
i
l
.c

I
t 1:
r'
(FINAU January 20051
1 1 f+?
?' yr
2-3
Purpose and Need

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
Total facilities at the MPMG Range complex would include a control tower, field service
head, operations/storage building, general instruction building, ammunition breakdown
building, covered bleacher enclosure, and covered mess. The MPMG range complex also
includes a vehicle holding area, Battle Site Zero area, a bivouac area, maneuver areas,
training areas, target emplacements, telephone distribution system, secondary power
distribution system, data distribution system, and a flagpole.
Gravel roads would be constructed around the perimeter of the range to facilitate security
patrols, serve as firebreaks, and allow vehicle access for maintenance. Utilities required
would include telephone and electricity. Electrical lines would be run to the individual
electronic targets buried 30-76 cm (12-30 inches) below the ground. Outdoor lighting
would be installed for the range. Water would be provided by the Onslow County Water
Department from a twelve-inch water main that exists along U.S. Highway 17, adjacent to
the northeast perimeter of the property. Wastewater collection utilities for the proposed
MPMG Range would tie into an existing lift station that is located at the eastern end of
Moore's Ridge Road (EDAW, Inc. 1998).
2.2.1.2 Operations
Operation of the MPMG Range would accommodate static marksmanship training and
dynamic assault-style shooting with M249, M240G, M2 50cal and MK19 machine guns and
M40A3 and M82A3 sniper rifles during day and night time training exercises. The M249, or
Squad Automatic Weapon (SAW), is a hand-held or bipod-mounted squad automatic weapon
that fires 5.56 mm linked ammunition up to a maximum range of 3,600 m (11,811 ft). The
M240G is a bipod-, tripod-, vehicle-, or aircraft-mounted medium machine gun that fires
7.62 mm linked ammunition to a maximum distance of 3,725 m (12,221 ft). Both the M249
and the M240G can be equipped with thermal imaging sights, allowing personnel to aim and
shoot in limited visibility conditions. The M2 is a heavy machine gun mountable on a tripod,
vehicle, or aircraft that fires .50 caliber (12.7 mm) rounds to a maximum distance of 6,500 m
(21,325 ft)... Occasionally, Scout Sniper Teams armed with the M40A3 7.62mm and
M82A3 .50 caliber sniper rifles would also use the range. The M40A3 7.62mm sniper rifles
have a maximum range of 5,288 m (17,349 ft) and the maximum range of the M82A3 .50
caliber sniper rifle is 6,500 m (21,325 ft). The MK 19 grenade machine gun is usually vehicle
mounted and fires 40 mm grenade to a maximum distance of 2,400 in (7,872 ft).
The range would be operational an average of 244 days per year and roughly one-third of
the operations would take place at night. Nighttime training is necessary so Marines can
become proficient with the thermal sights fitted on M249 and M240G machine guns. Live
ammunition would be used; there would be no inert rounds or dud-producing rounds used on
the MPMG Range. Helicopters are authorized to conduct door gunnery exercises from
altitudes below 152 m (500 ft) above ground level with inert rounds. Restricted airspace
exists over the entire GSRA (established by the Federal Aviation Administration in 1997),
and non-participating aircraft are restricted from airspace during military operations.
Surface Danger Zones (SDZ) would extend out in a fan-shape to a distance of 6,900 m
(22,632 ft) [6,500m for the SDZ plus 400m for maneuvering downrange], per the
requirements of the weapon with the longest range, the M2 .50-caliber machine gun.
(FINAL/ January 20051 2-4 Purpose and Need

L

F1

t
d

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune

2.2.2 Alternatives Considered But Eliminated

2.2.2.1 Construct Range at Site SR-8 West
The firing line for the MPMG range at this site would be located near the northwest
boundary of the GSRA. Weapons would be fired to the east, towards the center and
northern half of the GSRA.
This alternative would satisfy the mission requirements although it was dismissed because it
did not meet several of the screening criteria. The SR-8 West site would cause a conflict
with the currently operating Multi-Purpose Range Complex at site SR-10 and the proposed
P-032 Infantry Platoon Battle Course. Additionally, the noise modeling study (CHPPM
2003a) showed that MPMG Range at the SR-8 West site would produce an average day-
night noise level (DNL) of 65 A-weighted decibels (dBA) extending out to 1,400 in (4,593
ft) off-base, and DNL of 75 dBA noise contour extending out to 300 in (984 ft) off-base.
This could potentially have a noise affect to the communities adjacent to the western
property line of the GSRA.

Due to problems identified in the early planning stages with noise affects and range
conflictions, locating the MPMG range at SR-8 West is not considered further in this EA.
2.2.2.2 Construct Range between SR-6 and SR-7
A siting between currently operating ranges SR-6 and SR-7 on the east side of GSRA was
considered. This is approximately the site for SR-8 depicted in the GSRA Master
Development Plan Update (1998). This alternative was dismissed from further
consideration due to the potential confliction (crossfire) this would likely cause between the
proposed MPMG range and the two currently operating ranges (the Multi-Purpose Training
Range at SR-7 and the Infantry Platoon Battle Course at SR-6). This alternative would
preclude simultaneous use of other rangeg, including the proposed P-032 Infantry Platoon
Battle Course.
This alternative is not discussed further in this EA due to the safety and logistics concerns
this scenario could create.
2.2.3 No-Action Alternative
The no-action alternative would be to not construct and operate this MPMG range. This
would have an impact on MCB Camp Lejeune's ability to train Marines and other military
personnel. SOI and II MEF would have to use existing, inadequate and antiquated ranges at
MCB Camp Lejeune to train with their M249 and M240G machine-guns. M2.50 caliber
machine-gun practice would still pose a problem for MCB Camp Lejeune as current ranges
are unable to accommodate this weapon system without making special provisions such as
closing the Intra-Coastal Waterway.
In short, combat readiness and live fire proficiency would continue to be negatively
impacted by the lack of adequate ranges for machine gun and sniper teams if the no-action
alternative is implemented (the MPMG range is not constructed and operated). However,

[FINAU January 2005] 2-5 Purpose and Need
F1

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune

the no-action alternative will be carried through the EA to represent the baseline conditions
for comparison to the proposed action. ,

2.3 Summary of Environmental Effects of Alternatives
Table 2-1 summarizes the adverse and beneficial environmental effects of the two
alternatives: the Proposed Action, to construct and operate the MPMG Range at site SR-8 in
the GSRA, and the no-action alternative. r
Table 2-1 Summary of environmental effects for the
proposed MPMG Range and the no-action alternative.
Resources MPMG Range at SR-8 No-Action Alternative
Land Use and No impacts No impacts
Coastal Zone
Socioeconomic Minor Positive impacts Minimal Negative impacts
Short-term, temporary effects from Short-term, temporary
construction, maintenance and effects from training
training schedules outside the local area
Environmental No impacts No impacts
Justice
Transportation Minor impacts No impacts
Short-term, temporary effects during
construction only. No impacts
anticipated from the operation and
maintenance of proposed MPMG
range.
Utilities No impacts. No impacts
No significant demands to utility
systems beyond their intended
capacity
Air Quality No significant impact Minimal Negative impacts
Anticipate localized, short-term, Short-term, temporary
minimal impacts from construction effects from training
activities outside the local area
Noise No significant impact No impact
It is anticipated that off-base
properties would experience no
change in noise levels and no
changes in land use compatibility,
Cultural Resources No impacts No impacts
[FINAL/ January 2005] 2-6 Purpose and Need

I Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune

Resources MPMG Range at SR-8 No-Action Alternative
Soil Erosion No significant impact No impacts
Minor and localized impacts during
construction. No impacts from
operation and maintenance of
proposed MPMG range
Vegetation and No significant impact No significant impacts
Natural Periodic range maintenance of the Periodic range
Communities range fan in low-growth state maintenance and timber
harvesting occur in GSRA
Forest Management No significant impact No significant impacts
Minimal impacts. Permanent Periodic range
clearing of the range fan affects 2% maintenance and timber
o merchantable timber in GSRA harvesting occur in GSRA
Wildlife No significant impact No impacts
Minimal impacts from noise
disturbance, construction, and
vegetation clearing
Threatened and No impacts No impacts
Endangered Species
Flood plains No additional impacts No additional impacts
Water Quality No significant impact No impacts
Minor, manageable impacts due to
construction related activities
Wetlands No significant impact No impacts
Unavoidable wetland impacts would
be mitigated through the GSRA
Wetland Mitigation Bank as
negotiated with the USA CE and
NCDENR during the wetland
permitting process.
Hazardous Materials No significant impact No significant impact
Military Munitions Rule applies to
munitions being used for their
intended u ose
Safe No impacts No impacts
I [FINAU January 2005] 2-7 Purpose and Need

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
3 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT
1
As required by the CEQ's regulations implementing NEPA (40 CFR Part 1500), this chapter
describes the area(s) that would be affected by the proposed action. In this case, the
proposed area is SR-8 within the GSRA, MCB Camp Lejeune. Most of the potential
impacts would occur within the SR-8 site itself, confined to the immediate vicinity of the
MPMG range, while noise impacts would affect a larger area. The actual impacts of the
proposed range are addressed in Chapter 4 of this EA.
3.1 Land Use I
3.1.1 Zoning
The majority of the GSRA is designated by Onslow County as "Conservation". This
category is applied to areas of environmental concern (AEC's) including the Sandy Run
Pocosin. Appropriate uses allowed include silviculture, or timber management, recreational
hunting and fishing, and expansion of MCB Camp Lejeune Military Reservation. Limited
development is also allowed, such as dwellings and small commercial uses, provided
wetlands are protected and septic systems are not installed in unsuitable soils. I
Land areas to the northeast of GSRA include MCB Camp Lejeune (MCAS New River and
Mainside) and community developed areas at Verona, which include some commercial
concentrations. Dispersed low-density residential development is located along US
Highway 17. Commercial concentrations and developed communities are located at Dixon,
Folkstone, and Holly Ridge along US Highway 17. Prime farmland and scattered low-
density residential uses are located to the north and west of the GSRA (EDAW, Inc. 1998).
Onslow County is participating with MCB Camp Lejeune in a Joint Land Use Study (JLUS)
to identify areas near the boundaries of the installation where certain types of development
may be incompatible because of high noise levels caused by ordnance delivery and aircraft
operations. An integral part of the JLUS will be the Range Compatible Use Zone (RCUZ) '
study (LANTDIV 2002), which identifies average noise level contours and areas potentially
subject to vibration impacts. The county would use these contours to identify areas where
zoning could limit incompatible development, such as schools, churches, or housing.
3.1.2 Coastal Zone Management
The North Carolina Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) was passed in accordance with
the federal Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) of 1972. CAMA required local
governments in each of the 20 coastal counties in the state to prepare and implement a land
use plan and ordinances for its enforcement. Upon approval by the North Carolina Coastal
Resources Commission, the plan becomes part of the North Carolina Coastal Management
Plan. Coastal zone management policies adopted in each plan must be consistent with
established state and federal policies. Specifically, policy statements are required on
resource protection; resource production and management; economic and community
[FINAUJanuary 2006] 3-1 Affected Environment

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
development; continuing public participation; and storm hazard mitigation, post-disaster
recovery, and evacuation plans.
Onslow County, and subsequently the GSRA are in the coastal zone, although, lands owned
by the Federal government are excluded from the defined coastal zone. Section 307(c) of
the Coastal Zone Management Act requires any federal activity which directly affects the
land or water use or natural resources of the coastal zone, must be consistent to the
maximum extent practicable with the policies of the state approved plan.
3.2 Socioeconomics
MCB Camp Lejeune is home to the largest concentration of Marines and sailors in the
world. The total active-duty population of the Base in 2003 was 37,221 officers, enlisted
personnel, and students (USMC, 2003). On-base civilian employees added 4,883 personnel.
There were over 53,000 dependents of active-duty personnel. Over 42,000 military retirees
and dependents resided in the Jacksonville area (USMC, 2003).
MCB Camp Lejeune serves as the leading employer of Onslow County residents. In 2003,
the Base contributed more than $2.9 billion to the local economy, of which over 60 percent
was paid in the form of wages and salaries to its military and civilian employees and retirees
(USMC, 2003). It is anticipated that the Base's military workforce will remain the leading
regional industry in terms of employment and earnings.
Onslow County has considerably lower household and family income levels than the state as
a whole. Median household income in 1999 (Census 2000 data) was $33,756 for the county
and $39,184 for the state; median family income was $36,692 for the county and $46,335
for the state. However, the county percentages of the number of persons in poverty and the
numbers of families in poverty (12.9 percent and 10.8 percent, respectively) are comparable
to those of North Carolina (12.3 percent and 9 percent, respectively).
3.3 Environmental Justice
Executive Order (EO) 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income Populations, directs each federal agency to incorporate
environmental justice into its mission and activities. Each federal department and agency is
to accomplish this by conducting programs, policies, and activities that substantially affect
human health or the environment in a manner that does not exclude communities from
participation in, deny communities the benefits of, or subject communities to discrimination
under such actions because of their race, color, or national origin.
EO 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks,
requires each federal agency to identify and assess environmental health and safety risks to
children. "Environmental health and safety risks" are defined as "risks to health or to safety
[FINAUJanuary 2006] 3-2 Affected Environment

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
that are attributable to products or substances that the child is likely to come in contact with
or ingest."
The proposed action is evaluated with respect to EOs 12898 and 13045 in Subchapter 4.2.3.
The information below is derived from Census 2000 data, available on line.
Onslow County is home to a same proportion of minority residents as the state of North
Carolina as a whole: Census 2000 data show that in both the county and the state, 72.1
percent of the residents are identified as white, and 27.9 percent belonging to an ethnic or
racial minority. The county also has generally similar population ethnicity mix as the state,
the largest difference being the greater percentage of Hispanics residing in the county (7.2
percent) compared to the state (4.7 percent). The relative proportion of other ethnicities
(including African-American, Native American, and Asian) is only slightly lower or slightly
higher for Onslow County than for North Carolina as a whole. ,
No children reside near or spend any time in the vicinity of the proposed project site.

,
3.4 Infrastructure and Community Facilities Services
3.4.1 Transportation
Major thoroughfares in Onslow County include US Highway 17, NC State Road 50, NC
State Road 24, and NC State Road 258. US Highway 17 is a four lane road extending along
the eastern border of the GSRA, bisecting the property from the rest of MCB Camp Lejeune.
Three underpasses cross underneath US Highway 17, allowing access for Marines, their
equipment and vehicles to the GSRA from the MCAS New River and the Verona Loop

section of MCB Camp Lejeune without interfering with public transportation. '
Within the GSRA there are numerous dirt and gravel roads running throughout the property
that were previously used by International Paper Company to access timber stands. The
most important of these routes is Moore's Ridge Road that bisects the north and south halves
of the GSRA for approximately eight miles (EDAW, Inc. 1998). This road was recently ,
relocated to the south as a part of ongoing infrastructure improvements. in the GSRA, and to
accommodate the proposed SR-8 range. The old road alignment is still utilized as an access
road.
3.4.2 Utilities
3.4.2.1 Electricity
Presently, there is no electrical service to the proposed MPMG Range site. Power is
available from Jones Onslow Electrical Membership Corporation around the entire
perimeter of the GSRA at 12.47KV/7200, although only single-phase service exists along
NC State Road 50 on the western perimeter. These power lines are served from two
20MVA substations, one to the east at Folkstone and one to the north at Haw (EDAW,
Inc. 1998). ]FINAUJanuary 2006] 3-3 Affected Environment

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
3.4.2.2 Telephone/Communications
There are telephone lines at the proposed MPMG Range site. MCB Camp Lejeune
maintains an on-base communication network. Service areas include MCAS New River and
the Verona Loop and Rifle Range areas of the Mainside of MCB Camp Lejeune. A fiber-
optic cable has been extended to the GSRA from the New River telephone building. It
terminates in a switch building located at the east end of Moore's Ridge Road (EDAW, Inc.
1998).
3.4.2.3 Water
The Onslow County Water Department provides potable water along the north and east
perimeters of the GSRA. A twelve-inch water main exists along US Highway 17, adjacent
to the northeast perimeter of the property. A six-inch main exists to along the northern
boundary of the GSRA. The Onslow County Water system is a potable water system only,
and is not required to provide flow rates sufficient for firefighting.
MCB Camp Lejeune also operates several potable water systems. The closest of these
systems to the GSRA is the system serving Marine Corps Air Station New River.
3.4.2.4 Wastewater
Wastewater at MCB Camp Lejeune is conveyed to the new advanced wastewater treatment
plant (WWTP) located in the French Creek area of MCB Camp Lejeune. The new plant has
a design flow capacity of 15 mgd (56.8 mld) and a hydraulic capacity of 30 mgd (113.6 mld)
(Davis, February 1, 1999). MCB Camp Lejeune's NPDES permit allows the discharge of up
to 15 mgd through a diffuser into the New River. Average current discharge at MCB Camp
Lejeune is approximately six mgd (22.7 mld). Most of the sewer right-of-ways are located
along the sides of MCB Camp Lejeune's roadways.
There are no wastewater collection or treatment facilities presently serving the proposed
MPMG Range. A 10-inch sewer force main runs along the side of US Highway 17, along
the eastern boundary of the GSRA. Two lift stations are located on the GSRA, which
connect to the 10-inch main. One lift station is located at the eastern end of Moore's Ridge
Road and the other is located at the Multi-Purpose Training Range SR-7 (EDAW, Inc.
1998).

1
!1
3.5 Air Quality
The USEPA, under the requirements of the 1970 Clean Air Act (CAA) as amended in 1977
and 1990, has established National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for six
contaminants, referred to as criteria pollutants (40 CFR 50). These are: carbon monoxide,
nitrogen dioxide, ozone, particulate matter, lead, and sulfur dioxide. The North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) has adopted the USEPA's
NAAQS as the statewide ambient air quality standards.
Areas that meet the NAAQS standard for a criteria pollutant are designated as being in
"attainment"; areas where the criteria pollutant level exceeds the NAAQS are designated as
[FINAUJanuary 2006] 3-4 Affected Environment

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
being in "nonattainment". MCB Camp Lejeune and Onslow County are located in the
Southern Coastal Plain Intrastate Air Quality Control Region, which is defined in 40 CFR
Part 81.152, and is comprised of 13 counties. Pursuant to 40 CFR 81.334, each of the 13
counties that make up the Region has been designated as being in attainment for all criteria
pollutants.
The USEPA published the final rules on general conformity that apply to federal actions in
areas designated as being in nonattainment for any of the criteria pollutants under the CAA
(40 CFR Parts 51 and 93) in the November 30, 1993 Federal Register. Since the Proposed
Action would occur within an attainment area, the general conformity rules are not
applicable to the proposed action.
3.6 Noise
3.6.1 Noise Descriptors
Noise is defined as unwanted sound. The Noise Control Act of 1972 (Public Law 92-574
1972) states "...that it is the policy of the United States to promote an environment for all
Americans free from noise that jeopardizes their health or welfare" and that Federal agencies
"(1) having jurisdiction over any property or facility, or (2) engaged in any activity
resulting, or which may result, in the emission of noise, shall comply with Federal, State,
interstate, and local requirements..." [Section 4(b)]. In Section 6 of the Act, the
Administrator of the EPA is directed to establish noise emission standards for products and
to prescribe regulations for such products. However, in Section 3, Congress excluded any
military weapons or equipment that are designed for combat use from the definition of
`product'.
Noise is measured in units called decibels (dB). Since the human ear cannot equally
perceive all sound frequencies, these measurements are weighted to compensate for the
human lack of sensitivity to low- and high-pitched sounds. This adjusted unit is known as
the A-weighted decibel, or dBA, and is used to measure noise related to small arms firing.
Impulse noise, resulting from large caliber weapons (20 mm or greater, such as artillery and
demolition activities), is described in terms of C-weighted decibels (dBC). The dBC metric
emphasizes more of the low-frequency range of the sound than the A-weighted scale. The
low-frequency component of sound causes structures to vibrate, which is an important factor
in a person's perception of the sound and their potential level of annoyance.
For evaluation of community noise effects, the Day-Night Average Sound Level (DNL)
metric is often used and has been designated as the appropriate metric to represent the
effects of noise from Marine Corps ground training ranges (USMC 2005a). This metric
combines the levels and durations of noise events and the number of noise events over an
extended period. It is a cumulative average computed over a 24-hour period to represent
total noise exposure. A 10 dB adjustment is added to those noise events that occur between
10:00 pm and 7:00 am. This 10 dB "penalty" represents the increased intrusiveness of
sounds that occur during normal sleeping hours, both because of the increased sensitivity to
noise during those hours and because ambient sound levels during nighttime are typically 10
[FINAL/ January 2006] 3-5 Affected Environment
11

J

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
dB lower that during daytime hours. Additionally, the DNL is the only noise metric that has
a large body of scientific survey data about the reactions of people to noise. Interpretation
of DNL is usually based on the results of attitude surveys that have been conducted to
determine the percentages of people who express various degrees of annoyance when
' exposed to different levels of DNL.
The Department of Defense has developed land use planning guidelines for weapons noise.
These guidelines categorize land into three compatibility zones based on A-weighted and C-
weighted DNL (ADNL and CDNL) noise levels (see Table 3-1). There would be a low risk
of complaints from the public in these areas experiencing <65 dBA and <62 dBC noise level
during live-fire training (see Table 3-1).
7-7

Table 3-1 Noise zones and land use guidelines.
Noise Small Impulse Population
Zone Arms Noise Highly Land Use
ADNL CDNL Annoyed
I < 65 < 62 < 15 % Compatible with noise-sensitive land-use such as
dBA dBC hospitals and residential housing.
II 65-75 62-70 15-39% Normally incompatible with noise-sensitive land
dBA dBC use; compatible with some commercial and
industrial land-uses.
III >75 > 70 >39% Incompatible with noise-sensitive land use;
dBA dBC compatible only with some agriculture land use and
other unpopulated areas.
From: CHPPM 2 003a and 2 003c; LANTD IV 2002.
1 3.6.2 Existing Noise Levels
Existing noise levels in the GSRA are a result of training activities at existing ranges,
vehicle movement, and air operations. The May 2002 Final Range Compatible Use Zone
(RCUZ) Study for MCB Camp Lejeune, North Carolina (LANTDIV 2002) used noise data
collected in 2000. The RCUZ used ordnance and air operations data to conservatively
model C-weighted noise levels around the GSRA. The RCUZ shows the busiest-month
scenario (the busiest month for the year) noise levels of 60 dBC extending approximately
500 feet off-base across the northeast boundary of the GSRA, towards the community of
Verona. The RCUZ indicates the highest number of noise complaints originate from the
area near the community of Verona. Also, as modeled, a 60 dBC contour extends almost a
mile to the west of GSRA into rural and conservation areas. Some land uses may be
incompatible with noise levels predicted in these areas, although these are conservative
noise predictions based on the busiest-month's training levels. The average daily contours
were also predicted, using an average day of training activity for the year. In this scenario,
the 60 dBC noise contours are completely contained within the boundaries of the GSRA.

[FINAUJanuary 2006] 3-6 Affected Environment

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune I
The GSRA noise environment is dominated by large caliber (20mm and greater) noise
events at SR7 and SRI 0.
In June 2005, a noise study was prepared by the US Army Center for Health Promotion and
Preventative Medicine (USACHPPM) to include existing and future base-wide large caliber '
weapons noise contours (USACHPPM, June 2005). In this study CDNL contours were
predicted by applying a 15 percent growth factor to the CY2005 baseline large caliber
weapons operational data. It is expected that using a 15 percent growth factor in the noise
modeling would reflect cumulative noise effects from the majority of training operations for
the existing year (2005) as well as for future years. The DoD BNOISE2 model was used in
this study. Modeled existing noise contours indicated that:
• DNL noise levels at or greater than 70 C-weighed decibels (dBC) (Noise Zone 3) are
predicted to occur mostly within the base boundary.
• DNL noise levels at or greater than 62 dBC but less than 70 dBC (Noise Zone 2) are
predicted to mainly occur within the base boundary. Exceptions where the 62-dBC
contour extends off base include: the southern end that extends into Sneads Ferry, a
northern part that extends into Verona, the eastern end that extends into Willis
Landing, and the western end that extends off base to the west of the GSRZ.
The firing line of the proposed MPMG Range would be located between the large caliber I
noise events happening at SR7 to the north and SR10 to the southwest.
Existing noise levels in Onslow County are typical of those normally associated with the
level of development in the area, which can be classified as urban or suburban. The primary
source of noise within the city of Jacksonville and the more populated areas of Onslow
County is vehicular traffic. For a typical suburban area with associated traffic conditions,
ambient noise levels are typically 55-65 dBA. Rural and small town areas typically
experience lower ambient sound levels of 40-50 dBA.

[FINAL/ January 2006] 3-7 Affected Environment
n

I

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
1
1\
BASELINE NOISE DATA plus 15%
Annual Operating Days CY 2002
IBNOISE2 Model ) 05-02-05)
Land Use Planning Zone (57-62 dBC) US Army Guidance
r,,,' SE ZONE 2 (62-70 d8C)
NOSE ZONE 3 (>70 d8C)
Figure 3-1 CDNL Noise Contours (June 2005)
3.7 Cultural Resources
Cultural resources are subject to review under both federal and state laws and regulations.
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 empowers the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation to comment on federally initiated, licensed, funded, or
permitted projects affecting cultural sites listed or eligible for inclusion on the National
Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Once cultural resources have been identified, they are
evaluated for their eligibility for inclusion into the NRHP. If the resource is determined to
be eligible, an assessment is undertaken to identify any impacts that may result due to the
proposed action. Only cultural resources determined to be noteworthy (i.e., eligible for the
NRHP) are protected under the National Historic Preservation Act.
All of the GRSA, including the SR-8 site, has been investigated for cultural resources, and
contains no known archeological or historic sites. Archeological investigations of all soils
having a moderate or high probability of containing archeological remains were completed
with Technical Memorandum for Juniper Swamp Compartments 78, 79, and 80 in Greater
Sandy Run Training Area, Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina (2001). As
agreed to in a January 2000 meeting between MCB Camp Lejeune personnel and the North

(FINAL/ January 20061 3-8 Affected Environment

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
Carolina State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), the survey of the Juniper Swamp
concludes the required archeological investigations at the GSRA. In 9August 2005 letter,
NC SHPO affirmed that no further cultural resource surveys are necessary in the GSRA.
(See Appendix A)
3.8 Natural Resources
3.8.1 Topography and Soils
The topography across the GSRA is mostly flat with elevations ranging from 38 feet to 67
feet above mean sea level. The greatest topographic relief is in the eastern portion of the
GSRA, which drains north into the New River, while the western and central portions are
mostly broad, flat and poorly drained. The central part of GSRA is divided into two pocosin
basins by a narrow sandy ridge called Moore's Ridge.
The soil types identified in the SR-8 site are mostly loamy fine sands (Foreston, Stallings,
and Woodington) and fine sands (Baymeade, Leon, and Murville) with the remainder
classified as Croatan muck, Muckalee loam, and Torhunta fine sandy loam. The majority of
these soils are hydric in nature, associated with high water tables, and have a high organic
content and small particle size. Baymeade, Foreston, and Stallings are non-hydric soil types.
In general, the soils at the project site have a low potential for water or wind erosion (Geo-
Marine, Inc. 2005).
Classifying the site by drainage types, the area is a patchwork of "very poorly drained soils",
"poorly drained" and "somewhat poorly drained" soils. The land along the Moore's Ridge
Road is considered "somewhat poorly drained" and most suited for any development
activity at this site.
3.8.2 Vegetation and Natural Communities
The GSRA is approximately 16,592 ha (41,000 ac) of natural vegetation and young pine
stands of varying ages. One third of the GSRA is made up of two large pocosin basins.
These pocosins are generally made up of fetterbush and gallberry evergreen shrubs but
interspersed with an occasional loblolly and pond pine. The proposed site SR-8 is primarily
upland forest composed of two types of communities: pine plantations and regenerated
mixed pine woodlands.
The majority of the GSRA had been continuously logged since the 1940's and a series of
drainage ditches were dug by the International Paper Company to facilitate silviculture, or
timber management. Currently the upland SR-8 area is a combination of planted pine
woodland, primarily composed of loblolly pine and mixed pine woodlands. Both of these
upland community stands are relatively young.
The planted pine woodland canopy is dominated by loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) with an
under story varying from dense to sparse, depending on the frequency of fires. This under
[FINAL/ January 2006] 3-9 Affected Environment

I

f

1
1
Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
story is composed of greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia), blackberry (Rubus spp.), bracken fern
' (Pteridium aquilinum) and sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciua).
Loblolly pine also dominates the mixed pine woodland community, but shares the canopy
' layer with pond pine (Pinus serotina), longleaf pine (Pinus palustris), sweet gum
(Liquidambar styraciflua), red maple (Acer rubrum) and red bay (Persea borbonia). The
under story is defined as sparse to moderate in shrub/herbaceous density. The presence of
' fire controls the succession of hardwoods over the pine species in this community. Under
story species differ depending on the frequency of fire: broomsedges (Andropogon spp.),
paspalums (Paspalum spp.) and panic grasses (Panicum spp.) are found in areas with less
' fire maintenance; bracken fern and wire grass (Aristida stricta) flourish in frequent fire areas
(MCB Camp Lejeune 2001 a; Geo-Marine, Inc. 2005).

0

H
I I

n

3.8.3 Forest Management
The forestland aboard MCB Camp Lejeune has been under professional forest management
for more than 60 years. The purchase of the GSRA required the Forest Management
Program (FMP) to increase its manpower and equipment levels to adequately manage and
protect the additional area. The FMP provides a forested environment that meets the needs
of the military mission and sustains a flow of forest products such as good wildlife habitat,
recreational opportunities, and high quality wood products. Forest management activities
affect the forest ecosystem, requiring close coordination with other natural resource
managers and land planners.
3.8.3.1 Timber Management
The objective of the MCB Camp Lejeune silviculture system, also known as timber
management, is to provide a safe, healthy, sustainable forest ecosystem. An even-aged
silviculture system was implemented by the 1946 management plan. This system has
proven to be well suited for the multi-uses and sustainable forest ecosystem management
required by MCB Camp Lejeune's land area. MCB Camp Lejeune is divided into 91
compartments with the average size being approximately 404 ha (1,000 ac). Each
compartment is further divided into timber stands. Management of the forest ecosystem is
accomplished at the stand level, with stands normally being 4 ha (10 ac) or more and
delineated by species, age, and stocking levels. Additionally, the timber resource is
managed based on the guidelines of the RCW Management Plan. RCW nesting sites are not
included in timber harvests and some timber stands require leaving 6-10 "reserve trees" at
harvest to prevent forest fragmentation and provide nesting habitat (MCB Camp Lejeune
2001a).
The majority of the GSRA was under extensive pine management prior to the sale of the
land to the US government. The harvestable timber left at site SR-8 consists mostly of
loblolly pine and slash pine plantations with average age of 25 years, with some trees with
ages up to 60 years (loblolly pine normally harvested at 100 years). Hardwood stands on the
site consist of mostly black gum and maple (MCB Camp Lejeune 2001a).
[FINAUJanuary 2006] 3-10 Affected Environment
J

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
3.8.3.2 Wildland Fire
Historically, fire was the single most important natural process that shaped the landscape of
the Southeastern Coastal Plain. Many species of trees, pines especially, are dependent on
fire to keep the under story clear of brush and debris. This allows the seeds of those species
to have a clear area to germinate and grow, without competing for space or light with
hardwood species.
Prescribed (controlled) burning plays a vital role in the management of the southern pine
woodlands and is the most important tool that natural resource managers in the southeast can
use in terms of time, cost, and effectiveness to effect changes in the vegetation of the coastal
plain. Fire has many beneficial uses, including ecosystem restoration, maintenance of
wildlife habitat, site preparation for forest regeneration, reduction in the amount of
hardwood brush, and reduction of forest fuels available to wildfires. The SDZ's, like the
one that would be created for the proposed MPMG range, are controlled burned for wildlife
habitat improvement and wildland fire hazard reduction.
Much of the upland area surrounding the site SR-8 in the GSRA has been controlled burned
in the past. The Integrated Natural Resource Management Plan (1NRMP 2001) indicates
that the upland areas were burned one or two times between 1995 and 2000. Ranges at the
GSRA are burned as deemed necessary to reduce fuel loading and help prevent wildfires.
Current ranges also include firebreaks around their perimeters to help contain any fires that
may start within them.
3.8.4 Wildlife
3.8.4.1 Non-Game Species
Non-game species found on Camp Lejeune include raccoons, opossums, and a variety of
birds, reptiles, and amphibians. Non-game species are not directly managed for, but derive
secondary benefits from the various land management activities that take place aboard the
Base such as managing forest openings and prescribed fire. Much of non-game species
habitat is protected through association with other protected areas or species, such as
wetlands or longleaf pine savannas.
Mammals that have been documented at the GSRA include the marsh rabbit (Sylvilagus
palustris), hispid cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus), raccoon (Procyon lotor), southern short-
tailed shrew (Blarina brevicauda telmalestses), and gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargentus).
Avian species that could frequent the proposed site include various migratory and resident
passerines (warblers, thrushes, etc), various woodpecker species, barred owl (Stria varia),
American woodcock (Philohela minor), as well as raptors, such as the red-shouldered hawk
(Buteo lineatus) and Cooper's hawk (Accipiter cooperii). Typical reptile and amphibian
species could be well represented in the GSRA, including species such as the mud
salamander (Pseudotriton montanus), carpenter frog (Rana virgatipes), copperhead snake
(Agkistrodon contortrix), spotted turtle (Clemmys guttata), eastern box turtle (Terrapene
carolina) and five-lined skink (Eumeces fasciatus).
[FINAUJanuary 2006] 3-11 Affected Environment
r
u
0
u
0

0

H

J

E

fl
u
I
Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
3.8.4.2 Game Species
Camp Lejeune's game management program focuses on a variety of species including
white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), black bear (Ursus americanus), northern
bobwhite (Colinus virginianus), wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo), small game, and
migratory waterfowl. Open hunting seasons for these species are controlled by state and
federal regulations and coordinated with Base programs and policy regulations. The GSRA
represents two hunting areas: 4A in the northern-half, and 4B in the southern-half.
The management of deer on MCB Camp Lejeune and throughout the nation is evolving
from one of stocking/expansion to a more balanced effort to control deer numbers in
relationship to herd health, habitat carrying capacity, and cultural carrying capacity.
The black bear population within GSRA is estimated to be 40-80 animals. Data from home
range analyses indicate three primary use areas, the northern and southern pocosins and the
northwest corner of the area. During early to late summer, black bear use of the northwest
corner of GSRA is concentrated around private lands due to the availability of agricultural
crops.
3.8.5 Threatened and Endangered Species
The Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 and subsequent amendments provide for the
conservation of threatened and endangered species of animals and plants, and the habitats in
which they are found. The ESA prohibits jeopardizing endangered and threatened species or
adversely modifying critical habitats essential to their survival without specific authorization
from the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) or US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS). Section 7 of the Act requires consultation with NMFS or the USFWS to
determine when any endangered or threatened species under their jurisdiction may be
affected by a proposed action. The Marine Corps ensures that consultations are conducted as
required with the USFWS and NMFS under Section 7 for any action which "may affect" a
threatened or endangered species according to guidance provided in the Environmental
Resources Program Manual (MCO P5090.2).
' The state of North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) similarly lists plant and
animal species considered to rare, threatened, and endangered within the state. North
Carolina Administrative Code S.113.337 makes it unlawful to take, possess, transport sell,
barter, trade, exchange, export, or offer for sale, any animal on a protected wild animal list.
It does not restrict the rights of a landholder in the management of his lands for agriculture,
forestry, development, or any other lawful purpose without his consent.
I I
0

While the state statute does not bind MCB Camp Lejeune, the staff typically evaluates the
presence or absence of state-listed species when assessing the impacts of projects on the
Base. The state list includes all those species federally listed as threatened and endangered,
plus additional species that may not be rare, threatened, or endangered from a nationwide
perspective, but are so within the boundaries of the state (See Appendix B). The Carolina
goldenrod (Solidago pulchra) is the only state listed threatened or endangered species that
may be present in the GSRA that is not Federally threatened or endangered. Carolina
goldenrod is considered a Federal Species of Concern and is found within power-line
[FINAUJanuary 2006] 3-12 Affected Environment
I

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
easements along the western boundary of the GSRA. There are no known occurrences of
the Carolina goldenrod at site SR-8.
Camp Lejeune is home to several federally listed threatened and endangered species: red-
cockaded woodpecker (RCW), green and loggerhead sea turtles, rough leaved loosestrife
(RLL), seabeach amaranth, piping plover, American alligator, pondberry and bald eagle.
Table 3-2 Federally listed threatened and endangered species aboard MCB Camp Lejeune.
Common Name Scientific Name Status
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis Threatened'
Green Sea Turtle Chelonia mydas Threatened
Loggerhead Sea Turtle Caretta caretta Threatened
Piping Plover Charadrius melodus Threatened
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Threatened
Red-Cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
Seabeach Amaranth Amaranthus pumilus Threatened
Rough-Leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia Endangered
Pondberry
(aka Southern Spicebush) Lindera melissifolia Endangered
Note: 1. Status is "threatened" due to similar appearance to another threatened species.
Source: MCB Cam Le'eune 2001 a. and TenBrink 2005
Endangered species sites on Camp Lejeune are protected through the application of land
restrictions for specific training, management, and construction activities. For instance, both
RCW and RLL sites are buffered and marked with a single band of white paint around the
site perimeter. This marking serves as the visual cue that the area has associated restrictions.
RCW cluster sites have 200' buffers that extend outward from cavity trees. The protective
buffer for RLL extends 100' from the most peripheral individual plants. Within these
buffers, the following restrictions apply:
• Vehicular traffic is prohibited with the exception of those responding to a fire
emergency or associated with an authorized silviculture treatment.
• Excavation and/or soil disturbance is prohibited.
• Cutting or girdling pine trees is prohibited.
• Bivouacking or extended occupation of the site is prohibited.
• Only small arms blank firing is permitted (RCW)
• Forestry activities during the nesting season are prohibited.
Other protective measures are described in more detail in MCB Camp Lejeune's Integrated
Natural Resource Management Plan (INRMP) and Base Operating Instructions.

u
0
n
u

n

[FINAUJanuary 2006] 3-13 Affected Environment

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
'
3.8.5.1 Animals
' According to a 1993 North Carolina National Heritage Program Inventory, no Federally-
listed animal species were observed in the GSRA. However, two such species, the
American alligator and the RCW have been witnessed in the vicinity. The American
alligator itself is not Federally Threatened, but is listed as such due to its similarity in
appearance to the American crocodile (Crocodylus acutus), which is Federally Threatened.
' Camp Lejeune currently supports 80 active RCW clusters. This reflects a doubling in the
number of clusters since 1990. This growth is attributed to many factors, including the
success of artificial cavity provisioning, increased growing season burns, and an aging forest
with a surplus of RCW helpers and floaters in the population. To manage and direct
continuing RCW growth, Camp Lejeune coordinated with the USFWS in the development
of the Mission-Compatible, Long-Range RCW Management Plan (RCW Management
' Plan), implemented in 2000. There are no RCW nesting sites or foraging circles located in
the GSRA although foraging circles do border the eastern boundary. Because of the
extensive timber harvest prior to the government's acquisition of the property in 1991, there
is not much suitable RCW habitat in the GSRA. RCWs prefer mature pine stands. The
GSRA may support the RCW in the future, but will be considered supplemental to the
recovery goal (MCB Camp Lejeune 2001a).
'
3.8.5.2 Plants
The only known Federally listed Threatened or Endangered plant species to inhabit the
' GSRA is the Endangered Rough-Leaved Loosestrife. This species typically occurs at the
edges between pond pine pocosins and long-leaf pine uplands in grass-shrub habitats with
moist to seasonally saturated sands and shallow organic soils that overlay sand. The grass-
shrub habitat preferred by RLL is fire-maintained. RLL has also been found on deep peat in
the low shrub community of Carolina bays (Geo-Marine, Inc. 2005). According to the RLL
site characterization conducted jointly with the wetland delineation report (Geo-Marine, Inc.
' 2005), it is reasonable to assume that potential habitat for RLL occurs within the SR-8 site,
especially along the downrange (northwest) boundary along a 100-meter transect. Known
occurrences of RLL are found in the cleared power line corridor that runs parallel to US
Highway 17 on the southeast boundary of the GSRA. Another site where RLL is confirmed
is located along the northwest boundary (MCB Camp Lejeune 2001a). There are no known
occurrences of RLL at the SR-8 site.
n

0

During 2004 plant survey, a vegetative specimen was collected for further analysis and
plotted for its location in southwestern corner of GSRA. It wasn't until 2005 that the
specimen was identified as the pondberry, also known as the southern spicebush. The
pondberry is a Federally listed endangered plant species that prefers interior wetland
habitats. The plant grows in clumps of numerous stems and reproduces by means of stolons,
a stem growing along or under the ground and taking root to form new plants. However, the
pondberry live only a few years. Dead stems are replaced with new stems that emerge from
the rootstock. Unfortunately, the surveyed population of pondberry could not be relocated
in subsequent field investigations. The alleged location of the pondberry is about 8 km (5
miles) away from the proposed project site. It is possible but highly unlikely that pondberry
would occur within the proposed MPMG project site at SR-8. (TenBrink 2005)
[FINAUJanuary 2006] 3-14 Affected Environment
u

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
3.8.6 Floodplains
Executive Order 11988 sets forth the responsibilities of federal agencies in reducing the risk
of flood loss or damage to personal property, minimizing the impacts of flood loss, and
restoring the natural and beneficial functions of floodplains. This order was issued in
furtherance of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and the Flood Disaster Protection
Act of 1973.
Most of the northern-half of the GSRA is within the floodplain, with the exception of the
area near the eastern property line. Floodplains in the southern-half of the property are
generally limited to the areas immediately surrounding the watercourses. Flooding is not a
major hazard within the GSRA. The pocosins and associated hydric soils act like giant
sponges during storm events, holding rainwater and releasing it over time. Consequently,
streams originating in pocosins typically have a steady flow of water under most conditions,
and rarely experience large fluctuations of flow (EDAW, Inc. 1998).
3.9 Water Resources
3.9.1 Surface Water
The Greater Sandy Run Pocosin, along with its associated creeks and artificial drainage
ways, is the dominant hydrologic feature in the GSRA. Five major drainage outfalls are
located throughout the GSRA, including Sandy Run Swamp Creek, Juniper Swamp Creek,
Hicks Run, Haws Run, and two runs of Shelter Swamp Creek. Sandy Run Swamp Creek,
Juniper Swamp Creek, and Shelter Swamp Creek provide outlets to secondary and primary
watercourses that feed the Northeast Cape Fear River 32 miles to the west. Haws Run and
Hicks Run discharge in a northeasterly direction to the Southwest Creek, which discharges
into the New River. The creeks are small, sluggish blackwater creeks with their headwaters
generally located in the pocosins, and bordered by hardwood bottomland forests. The SR-8
site contains no major creeks or tributaries.
Within the GSRA interior, water drainage has been greatly accelerated by an extensively
ditched network placed there by the timber industry before the acquisition of the property by
the Federal government. The largest network of ditches drains the north central pocosin
from the north into the westerly flowing man-made channels, which empty into the Sandy
Run Swamp Creek in the northwest quadrant of the GSRA. A portion of the north central
area also is drained to the south by a separate series of ditches and westerly flowing
channels, eventually draining into the northern fork of Shelter Swamp Creek. The SR-8 site
is not extensively ditched.
The creeks within the GSRA are rated Class C, which means they are fit for aquatic life, but
not for bathing or as a water supply. The creeks of the GSRA are also designated as `swamp
waters', which are defined as waters that have low velocities and other specific natural
characteristics. In general the water is dark, tannic, and acidic, but of good quality (EDAW,
Inc. 1998; LANTDIV 1996).
[FINAUJanuary 2006] 3-15 Affected Environment
n
u

J

r

I?
V

?7
L
n

I?
U
Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
3.9.2 Groundwater
There are two primary groundwater supplies in Onslow County - the relatively deep, higher
quality, Cretaceous Aquifer and the relatively shallow, lower quality Castle Hayne Aquifer.
The Cretaceous Aquifer, which is actually a system of aquifers (Lower Cape Fear, Upper
Cape Fear, Peedee, and Black Creek Aquifers), recharges more slowly than the rate at which
the area utilities are withdrawing water. Evidences of this overuse within Onslow County
includes an average lowering of the Cretaceous water table by 4 to 6 ft (1.2 to 1.8 m) per
year, and by an advancing front of salt-water intrusion near the coast. The Castle Hayne
Aquifer is able to maintain a relatively rapid rate of recharge due to the higher
transmissitivity of the sandy soils and its proximity to the surface (EarthTech/TAMS 2003).
The highest quality water is found within the Cretaceous Aquifers, the deepest of the area's
aquifer systems, which is low in minerals, silica, iron, and sulfate. The quality of water in
the Castle Hayne Aquifer is medium hard, and in place, iron is present in objectionable
quantities. Septic tank systems are the only known source of potential aquifer pollution in
the immediate vicinity in the GSRA. The present efficiency of septic system treatment
throughout Onslow County is very low, but due to low-density rural development in the
immediate vicinity of the GSRA, groundwater pollution does not appear to be a problem
(EDAW, Inc. 1998).
3.9.3 Wetlands
' The Clean Water Act (CWA) of 1977, as Amended (Public Law 95-217, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et
seq.) is the major Federal legislation concerning improvement of the nation's water
resources. The CWA contains specific provisions for the regulations of dredge soil disposal
' into navigable waters and for the placement of material into wetlands. A Section 404 Permit
from the USACE, Federal Consistency Determination Concurrence and a North Carolina
Section 401 Certification would be required for the dredging/filling of wetlands.
' As part of the study for this EA, a wetland delineation of the SR-8 site was conducted and
verified by the USACE. The findings were published in Wetland Delineation, P-034 Multi-
Purpose Machine Gun Range, Greater Sandy Run Area, Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune,
' Jacksonville, North Carolina (Geo-Marine, Inc. 2005). Approximately 50.1 ha (123.8 ac)
(41.3%) of the 121 ha (300-ac) SR-8 site is classified as wetlands of eight community types:
' • Palustrine forested needle-leaved evergreen (PF04) - 8.9 ha (22.1 ac).
• Palustrine scrub-shrub needle leaved evergreen (PSS4) - 0.2 ha (0.5 ac).
• Palustrine forested needle-leaved evergreen / scrub-shrub broad-leaved evergreen
(PF04/SS3) - 20.3 ha (50.2 ac).
• Palustrine forested broad-leaved deciduous (PFO 1) - 4.0 ha (9.8 ac).
• Palustrine forested broad-leaved deciduous / scrub-shrub broad-leaved evergreen
(PFO1/SS3) -1.0 ha (2.5 ac).
• Palustrine forested needle-leaved evergreen / scrub-shrub broad-leaved evergreen
saturated (PF04/PSS3B) - 0.4 ha (0.9 ac).
• Palustrine scrub-shrub (PSS) - 0.7 ha (1.8 ac).

[FINAUJanuary 2006] 3-16 Affected Environment

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
• Palustrine forested broad-leaved deciduous & needle-leaved evergreen / scrub-shrub
broad-leaved evergreen (PFO1/4/SS3) -14.5 ha (35.9 ac).
• Palustrine scrub-shrub broad-leaved evergreen / forested broad-leaved deciduous
(PSS3/PFO1) - 0.04 ha (0.1 ac).
Nearly one-third of the GSRA is made up of the Greater Sandy Run Pocosin, an alluvial
palustrine forested wetland. It is divided into two separate areas by an east/west upland land
feature called Moore's Ridge. Of the 11 classes of wetlands and deepwater habitats
commonly accepted (Cowardin et al. classification), two classes, palustrine forested and
scrub-shrub wetlands, make up 41.3% of the SR-8 area.
A canopy layer greater than 20 feet in height and the presence of under story herb and shrub
layers identify forested wetlands. They are considered a climax community, where in the
absence of altering disturbance, the community remains stable and no succession occurs.
Palustrine forests are further broken down into five subclasses, of which two were identified
at SR-8: broad-leaved deciduous forests (PFO1) and needle-leaved evergreen forests (PF04).
Broad-leaved deciduous wetlands are generally dominated by tree species such as red maple,
black gum (Nyssa sylvatica), and sweet gum. Mid-story of this subclass is comprised of red
bay, sweet bay (Magnolia virginiana), ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana), and American
holly (Ilex opaca). The dominant canopy species in needle-leaved deciduous is the bald
cypress (Taxodium distichum), while the under story of this class at the proposed GSRA
sites is poorly developed. The needle-leaved evergreen canopy is dominated by pond pine
and loblolly pine, with a mid-canopy similar to the broad-leaved deciduous wetland. These
three subclasses all share similar shrub layers of highbush blueberry (Vaccinium
corymbosum), titi (Cyrila racemiora), wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), inkberry (Ilex
glabra), fetterbush (Lyonia lucida) and sweet pepperbush (Clethra alnifolia).
Scrub-shrub wetland communities are defined by the dominance of woody vegetation less
than 20 feet tall. Young trees, true shrubs or stunted trees make up the woody vegetation
and the community may be a successional stage to forested wetland or a stable community,
depending on environmental conditions. Variable hydrologic conditions and landscape
promote highly variable species composition in these communities.
There are five subclasses of scrub-shrub wetlands, but only two are associated with site SR-
8: scrub-shrub broad-leaved evergreen (SS3) and needle-leaved evergreen (SS4). Broad-
leaved evergreen scrub-shrub wetlands have organic soils and dominant species include titi,
fetterbush, inkberry, and evergreen bayberry (Myrica heterophylla). Needle-leaved
evergreen scrub-shrub wetlands are generally composed of young or stunted pond pine or
loblolly pine. Both of these scrub-shrub communities at the proposed site contain young
tree species, as well as a defined shrub stratum and herbaceous layer. Several fern species
populate this herb layer including netted chain fern (Woodwardia areolata), royal fern
(Osmunda regalis), cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamomea), sensitive fern (Onoclea
sensibilis) and bracken fern.
[FINAUJanuary 2006] 3-17 Affected Environment

'I

r

L

1
Cli

?I

L

7
L

Figure 3-1 Cowardin wetland classes at site SR-8.

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
Wetland mitigation banking is the process by which wetlands are created, restored,
enhanced, or preserved and then set aside to offset anticipated future losses of wetlands for
development activities. In recognition of the potential need for mitigation at the GSRA,
MCB Camp Lejeune established a wetland mitigation bank in three sections within the
southern-half at the GSRA (EDAW, Inc. 1998).
The Wetland Mitigation Bank provides 505 ha (1,250 ac), also known as credits, of current
and future mitigation for pocosin, pine flat, and bottomland hardwood wetland systems. The
Bank was created primarily to mitigate wetland impacts in the GSRA. Much of the current
mitigation work involves plugging or damning the ditches to restore the historical hydrology
to the ecosystem. Unavoidable wetland impacts would be mitigated through the GSRA
Wetland Mitigation Bank.
Cowardin Wetlands Classes
- Palustrine forested broad-leaved deciduous
- Pelustrine forested needle-leaved evergreen
- Patustrine forested neede•leaved evergreen/suub-shrub broad-leaved evergreen
® Palustrine forested needle-leaved avergreentscrub -shrub broad-leaved evergreen saturated
Pelustrine forested broad-leaved deciduousMseds-leaved ever reentscrub•shrub broad-leaved evergreen
Palustrine forested broad-eaved deciduoushmb-shrub broad-leaved evergreen
- Palustrins, forested naadalwved evergaefterub-shrub breed-leaved evergreen
- Polustrine scrub-shrub
IIN,,
Pelustrinescrub-shrub neeawleavadevergreen 0 100'200 400 600 800 I\
Upland MeR r. ry
[FINAL/ January 2006] 3-18
Affected Environment
11
Wetlands within Proposed MPMG Range at SR-8

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
3.10 Hazardous Materials Management
Hazardous materials and wastes are regulated by the USEPA in accordance with the Federal
Water Pollution Control Act; the Clean Water Act; the Solid Waste Disposal Act; the Toxic
Substance Control Act; Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act; and the Clean Air Act.
Hazardous materials are materials that have been determined to be capable of posing an
unreasonable risk to health, safety, or property. The storage, use, and transportation of all
hazardous materials are managed in compliance with all federal, state, and local laws.
Additionally, the Standard Operating Procedures for Range Control (Base Order P3570.1)
establish environmental restrictions, including handling hazardous materials, petroleum,
oils, and lubricants. No hazardous materials or petroleum products are stored at the GSRA.
3.10.1 Munitions
On 12 February 1997, the USEPA published its Final Military Munitions Rule in 40 CFR
Parts 260-266, 270 in the Federal Register. These rules were developed pursuant to Section
107 of the Federal Facility Compliance Act of 1992 and the Resources Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA). When military munitions are used for their intended purpose (i.e.
training; research and development; and explosive ordnance disposal), they are not
considered hazardous waste for regulatory purposes, even if the intended purpose results in
the deposit of munitions on land.
Ammunition is not permanently stored at the GSRA, and therefore must be brought from the
ammunition magazines located on the Mainside of MCB Camp Lejeune to ammunition
distribution points within the current ranges during training exercises. RCRA subtitles C
and D cover transportation, storage, and disposal activities for solid waste (or hazardous
waste). MCB Camp Lejeune manages solid and hazardous wastes with compliance to all
federal, state, and local laws.
3.11 Safety
The MPMG Range would provide live-fire training facilities for required military training
scenarios utilizing machine guns and small arms. Standard safety procedures for these
weapons systems and training scenarios are in use throughout the Marine Corps, including
other currently operating ranges at MCB Camp Lejeune. If the MPMG Range were
constructed at site SR-8 in the GSRA, site-specific procedures would be developed for the
range operation as required by Marine Corps Orders (MCO P3570.1B/AR 385-63).
The GSRA presently has "No Trespassing" boundary signs posted every 200 feet and road
gates installed at key entrances prohibiting entry by unauthorized personnel. Prior to range
operation, the area would have additional warning signs, barriers, and range guards, as
required by Marine Corps Orders (MCO P3570.1 VAR 385-63).
[FINAUJanuary 2006] 3-19 Affected Environment

u

J
' Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
3.11.1 Surface Danger Zones and Clear Zones
Surface Danger Zones are identified hazard areas assigned to weapons firing activities
occurring at a military installation. SDZs are configured based on the weapon system, range
' design, and the maximum distance the ammunition can travel downrange to encompass the
area in which projectiles will land, either through direct fire or as a result of a ricochet. In
doing so, SDZs help to ensure that firing range operations will not encroach upon
' incompatible land uses (e.g. residential areas and airfields). The Clear Zone is the area of
the range that encompasses the targets and firing positions.
' The GSRA currently contains four SDZs associated with the four currently operating ranges
on the property. Firing lines for the Multi-Purpose Training range at SR-7 and the Infantry
Platoon Battle Course at SR-6 are located on the east side of the northern-half of the GSRA.
The SDZs for these ranges begin at the firing lines and fan out towards the western side of
the GSRA. The SDZs from each range overlap the downrange portion of the other range's
CZ. The Multi-Purpose Range Complex at SR-10 and the Pistol Range at SR-11 are both
located near the center of the southern-half of the GSRA. SR-10 has a SDZ beginning at the
' southern extent of the range (the firing line) and fanning out downrange towards the north.
The SDZ for SR-10 overlaps a small portion of the downrange part of the SR-6 CZ. SR-11
is a baffled bullet trapped range that has a very small SDZ requirement (EDAW, Inc. 1998).
3.11.2 Restricted Airspace
The routine firing of live ordnance into a distant impact area necessitates the restriction of
aircraft from above the training grounds of the GSRA. The Marine Corps proposal to create
a type of Special Use Airspace, a Restricted Area, over the GSRA was approved by the

' Federal Aviation Administration on 6 November 1997. The Restricted Area boundaries
generally follow the boundaries of the GSRA and encompass all the ordnance impact areas
and the helicopter training areas. The established Restricted Area boundaries and three
' stratification levels (0-6,999; 7,000-9,999; and 10,000-17,999 feet above mean sea level)
correspond to the safety buffer and vertical height requirements of the ranges. All small
arms and machine gun fire can be accommodated with the lowest stratification level (0-

I 6,999 feet above mean sea level). It was essential to establish this Restricted Airspace to
satisfy both Marine Corps range development and usage requirements, as well as civil and
commercial aviation safety (EDAW, Inc. 1998).

n

[FINAUJanuary 2006] 3-20 Affected Environment

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
4 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES
This chapter describes the anticipated direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of the
Proposed Action and the No Action Alternatives. Potential environmental impacts could
result from the construction and operation of the MPMG range. The remainder of this
chapter briefly describes criteria used to judge the severity and scope of effects to specific
resources, and then identifies the potential impacts due to implementing each alternative.
4.1 Land Use
4.1.1 Zoning
This analysis of potential land use impacts includes the examination of the potential effects
on land use activities and examination of consistency with land use plans and policies for
surrounding areas.
4.1.1.1 Construct Range at SR-8
The construction and use of the MPMG Range at site SR-8 would cause no impacts to the
current land use policies of Onslow County. The majority of the GSRA is designated by
Onslow County as "Conservation" and appropriate uses include the expansion of MCB
Camp Lejeune Military Reservation.
The proposed MPMG Range would not affect the Onslow County/MCB Camp Lejeune
Joint Land Use Study. There would be no change to the noise or weapons footprints
described in the Range Compatible Use Zone (RCUZ) study (LANTDIV 2002), which is an
integral part of the JLUS.
4.1.1.2 No-Action Alternative
Under the no-action alternative, to not build and operate the MPMG Range, there would be
no potential to additionally impact any zoning or land use policies. Current activities at the.
GSRA would continue to be consistent with the Onslow County's land use designation. The
2002 RCUZ and the related JLUS already account for the current ranges at GSRA.
4.1.2 Coastal Zone Management
Impacts to Coastal Zone Management are judged based on the potential to affect the state
approved coastal zone policies. In North Carolina, the CAMA is the state approved CZMA
policy dealing with resource protection and management, economic and community
development, continuing public participation, storm hazard mitigation, post-disaster
recovery, and evacuation plans.
4.1.2.1 Construct Range at SR-8
Onslow County, and subsequently the GSRA are in the coastal zone, although, lands owned
by the Federal government are excluded from the defined coastal zone. Only proposed
[FINAL/ January 2006] 4-1 Environmental Consequences

li

1
7

IJ

1
1
F
L-1
Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune

actions that affect areas off-base are considered as potential impacts to the coastal zone.
Based on an evaluation of potential impacts resulting from the proposed MPMG Range at
site SR-8, no impacts are expected to travel off-base, and therefore there are no potential
impacts to North Carolina's coastal zone or CAMA. Furthermore, all potential impacts
within GSRA have mitigation planned to offset any adverse impacts. Therefore, the
operation and construction of the MPMG Range is, to the maximum extent practicable,
consistent with the enforceable policies of North Carolina's CAMA.
4.1.2.2 No-Action Alternative
The no-action alternative, not to build and operate the MPMG Range (P-034) at site SR-8
1 would result in no potential to affect the coastal zone of North Carolina.

4.2 Socioeconomics
This section evaluates socioeconomic impacts that could result from the construction and
operation of the MPMG Range (P-034). Negative changes to the job-market, population, or
' tax-base of an area caused by the proposed action (directly or indirectly) would constitute a
socioeconomic impact.
4.2.1 Construct Range at SR-8
Socioeconomic impacts due to the building and operation of the MPMG Range at site SR-8

' could result from the temporary increase in labor and materials demand for range
construction; the permanent addition of 2-3 employees for range control and maintenance;
or the regular, minor, short-term increases of military personnel in the local area training at

' the MPMG Range.
Building the MPMG range and facilities would generate a local, temporary increase in
construction jobs and sales of construction materials, which in turn would temporarily
' increase sales-tax revenues. The budget for constructing the proposed MPMG Range is
approximately $5 million. The earth moving and carpentry trades would benefit the most,
because the majority of the range construction would fall into these two categories. The
construction of the range would benefit the local construction industry.
The control and maintenance of the MPMG Range would require the on-site contractor that
controls and maintains the other ranges at GSRA to increase its personnel to account for the
new range. The exact number of jobs to be created would be up to the contractor, but
adding a few positions would be necessary. This would cause a minor positive benefit to the
local job-market.
There would also be a minimal increase in local revenues, and therefore sale tax collection,
' due to training at the MPMG Range. MCB Camp Lejeune personnel qualifying with
machine guns would stay in the local area instead of traveling to other bases outside the area
to receive the required training, keeping their money within the local economy.
Additionally, military personnel from outside the area would utilize MCB Camp Lejeune's
state-of-the-art facility and consequently spend money within Onslow County for food,

[FINAU January 2006] 4-2 Environmental Consequences

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
lodging, and entertainment. Local merchants would benefit, and therefore sales-tax
revenues would increase.
4.2.2 No-Action Alternative
The decision not to build the MPMG Range (P-034) would result in no additional
socioeconomic impacts to the local community. Minor socioeconomic impacts would
continue to be incurred when MCB Camp Lejeune personnel travel to bases outside of the
area to complete their machine gun qualifications, and consequently spend their money
outside of the local community.
4.3 Environmental Justice
This section evaluates Environmental Justice impacts are based on, Executive Order (EO)
12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-
Income Populations, and EO 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks for the construction and operation of MPMG Range (P-034). Impacts
could include denying benefits, excluding communities from public participation, or
otherwise discriminating based on race, color, national origin, or income level. An
environmental health risk or safety risk that may disproportionately affect children would
also be considered an impact.
4.3.1 Construct Range at SR-8
The construction and operation of the MPMG Range would not affect the public beyond the
boundaries of MCB Camp Lejeune, and therefore would not cause disproportionately high
adverse environmental and health impacts to, or otherwise discriminate against, any
minority, or low-income people. Additionally, no children would be affected by
implementing the proposed action.
4.3.2 No-Action Alternative
The No-Action Alternative, Not constructing and operating the MPMG Range (P-034) at the
SR-8 site, would result in no potential to disproportionately impact any groups of
individuals. Current ranges at GSRA would continue to operate as they have; they do not
disproportionately affect any group of people.
4.4 Infrastructure and Community Facilities Services
4.4.1 Transportation
Transportation and circulation impacts include potential traffic increases and their effects on
roadway and intersection capacities.
[FINA U January 2006] 4-3 Environmental Consequences

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune

4.4.1.1 Construct Range at SR-8
The construction of the proposed MPMG Range could cause increased road traffic in the
local area. This impact would be short term, lasting only for the duration of the construction
' activities. For approximately 24 months construction materials would have to be trucked to
site SR-8 at GSRA, probably along U.S. Highway 17. During construction, customary
signage and flagmen, in conjunction with scheduling to avoid undue impacts during times of
heavy local traffic, would be initiated to avoid traffic congestion. Therefore, no impacts to
traffic are expected from the construction of the proposed MPMG Range.
Vehicular traffic associated with a few additional range personnel and transporting Marines
' and other operating forces to the range would have minimal impact on traffic conditions. A
few additional range personnel may be required to manage and maintain the proposed range;
they would likely access the GSRA along U.S Highway 17, with no noticeable effects to
' traffic volume in the area. Underpasses connect the Mainside of MCB Camp Lejeune with
the GSRA underneath U.S. Highway 17, allowing Marines and operating forces and vehicles
involved in training to move back and forth without interfering with the public traffic.
' Therefore, no impacts to traffic are anticipated due to the operation and maintenance of the
proposed MPMG Range (P-034).

1-7
L
7
L

1

4.4.1.2 No-Action Alternative
The no-action alternative, not to build and operate the MPMG Range (P-034) at the GSRA,
would not cause any additional impacts to traffic. Some personnel that work at GSRA
would continue to utilize U.S. Highway 17 to access the property. Marines and operating
forces and their military vehicles would continue to utilize the underpasses to avoid
interfering with traffic on the local highways.
4.4.2 Utilities
Impacts to utilities occur when the proposed action places demands on a public utility
system beyond its designed capacity.
4.4.2.1 Construct Range at SR-8
Electrical service to the proposed MPMG Range site would be provided from Jones Onslow
Electrical Membership Corporation from the perimeter of the GSRA. The MPMG range
would have relatively low power demands, mostly for lights and electronic targetry, and
would not place excessive demands on current public power grids. Telephone and
communications lines for the proposed MPMG Range would be supplied from the on-base
communication network. The fiber-optic cable would be tapped into at the switch building
located at the east end of Moore's Ridge Road. Water would be provided by the Onslow
County Water Department from a twelve-inch water main that exists along U.S. Highway
17, adjacent to the northeast perimeter of the property. Wastewater collection utilities for
the proposed MPMG Range would tie into an existing lift station, which is located at the
eastern end of Moore's Ridge Road (EDAW, Inc. 1998). Overall, utility demands for the
proposed MPMG Range would be low. No significant demands to public utility systems
beyond their intended capacity would result, and therefore no impacts to utilities are
anticipated.
[FINAU January 2006] 4-4 Environmental Consequences

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
4.4.2.2 No-Action Alternative
The no-action alternative, to not build and operate the MPMG Range, would result in no
new demands to public utilities. MCB Camp Lejeune would continue to use public utilities
within some areas of the base. MCB Camp Lejeune works closely with public utility
providers in Onslow County and eastern North Carolina to help provide continued long-term
planning and supplemental utility services (EarthTech/TAMS 2003).
4.5 Air Quality
Emission thresholds associated with federal CAA conformity requirements are the primary
means of assessing the significance of air quality impacts. Potential impacts are evaluated
based on estimated direct and indirect emissions associated with the construction and
operation of the MPMG range (P-034).
4.5.1 Construct Range at SR-8
The construction and operation of the proposed MPMG Range at site SR-8 could cause
temporary, localize impacts to air quality through emissions and fugitive dust from earth-
moving and other .construction equipment, or from emissions from gunpowder detonation
during the operation of the range. Wildland fire caused by live-fire training exercises could
also cause air quality impacts.
Construction would entail earth movement both within the range and possibly from off-site
borrow quarries, which would cause minor impacts to air quality from vehicle emissions and
fugitive dust. These emissions would be localized, short term and minor. Fugitive dust
control would be mitigated as part of the construction plan.
Emissions from localized activities associated with the operation of the proposed MPMG
Range would primarily be particulate matter with other criteria pollutants emitted to a much
smaller extent and total emissions for the site are expected to be low. No impacts are
expected because of operation of the proposed MPMG Range at site SR-8.
The Clean Air Act of 1970, 42 USC 7401 et seq. (amended 1977 and 1990), requires that the
EPA promulgate rules to ensure that federal actions conform to the appropriate State
Implementation Plan. These rules are only applicable to nonattainment areas, and are
therefore not relevant to this proposed project since Onslow County is in attainment for all
criteria pollutants.
Emissions from wildland fire are a concern and could have negative impacts to air quality if
the fire burned for extended time periods, and if adverse weather conditions are present.
Wildland fire control is addressed in MCB Camp Lejeune's INRMP (MCB Camp Lejeune
2001), and analyzed further in section 4.8.3.2 of this EA. A specific range management plan
would be developed for the proposed MPMG Range (P-034) and would outline the standard
operating procedures including potential to restrict live-fire training exercises during high
fire potential periods.

[FINAUJanuary 2006] 4-5 Environmental Consequences

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
1
4.5.2 No-Action Alternative
The no-action alternative, not to build and operate the MPMG Range would result in no
potential to affect air quality. Minor impacts to air quality would continue at MCB Camp
Lejeune due to ongoing operations and training. Minor impacts to air quality would also
continue elsewhere in the Onslow County community resulting from temporary construction
projects, vehicle emissions, and industry. Since Onslow County is in attainment for all
criteria pollutants, the release of small amounts of pollutants is not a significant impact.
4.6 Noise
The primary factor considered in determining the significance of potential noise impacts is
the extent or degree to which the proposed action would affect the baseline noise
' environment. The main issue of concern with regard to noise is the potential for impacts to
the human environment and potential land uses. Therefore, changes in land use
compatibility zones and percent of population highly annoyed due to the proposed action are
appropriate measures of impact.
As part of this EA, the small arms ADNL were modeled for the MPMG Range and other
existing ranges at the GSRA. Environmental Noise Contours for Proposed P034 Multi-
Purpose Machine Gun Range, U.S. Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina
dated 25 March 2003 and Addendums dated 27 August 2003 and 30 December 2003, were
produced by the U.S. Army CHPPM (CHPPM 2003a, 2003b, and 2003c).
The ADNL noise contours were predicted using the Small Arms Range Noise Assessment
Model (SARNAM). SARNAM is a software program developed in 1998 by the U.S. Army
Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (CERL) that produces estimated 24-hour
DNL (dB) noise level contours resulting from weapons firing activities at small arms ranges.
SARNAM considers the type of weapon and ammunition, the number of rounds fired, the
time of day, and range attributes such as range size and barriers (i.e., baffling).
R
SR
4.6.1 Construct
ange at
-8
The proposed MPMG Range (P-034) could impact the noise environment due to noise from
the frequent firing of multiple machine guns. However, the firing line of the range would be
located over one mile from the nearest GSRA/Onslow County boundary. This would allow
the noise from the proposed range to attenuate (i.e. become quieter) over the distance
between the firing line and off-base locations, helping to mitigate any potential noise
impacts beyond MCB Camp Lejeune's boundaries.
According to the SARNAM computer model, all areas adjacent to the GSRA would
experience DNL sound levels of less than 65 dBA due to proposed training at the MPMG
Range. Likewise, when the potential noise generated by the proposed action is added to the
current noise environment from the existing ranges at the GSRA, the 65 dBA contour is
completely within MCB Camp Lejeune's boundaries. These model results indicate noise
f,,
[FINAUJanuary 2006] 4-6 Environmental Consequences

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
contours would be contained within the boundaries of MCB Camp Lejeune, and areas off-
base would be in noise compatible land uses where DNL is less than 65 dBA. (see Figure 4-
1 and Table 3-3). The noise associated with proposed MPMG range would be similar to
existing conditions, with DNL less than 65 dBA. Therefore, the proposed range is
compatible with present land uses. (CHPPM 2003a and 2003c; LANTDIV 2005.)
Furthermore, studies have demonstrated that people consider themselves unaffected from
small arms when peak noise levels are below 85dBP (Hede and Bullen 1982). Table 4-1
provides a list predicted noise levels from firing live rounds at specific distance from the
firing line. The range of noise levels is due to the variation in weather conditions on a noise
event. An azimuth is a horizontal point of reference, similar to points of a compass. The 0°
Azimuth would be in the direction of fire, the 180° Azimuth would be in the opposite
direction (behind) the line of fire. The 90° Azimuth would be fixed point at a right angle to
the left or right of the firing line. The closest noise sensitive noise receptor is the community
of Dixon (distance greater than 2,000 in or 6,560 ft or 1.24 miles away) but behind the firing
line at 180° Azimuth. The loudest weapon is the .50 Cal. Therefore, the predicted level of
noise at 180° Azimuth is expected to be in the 73-88 range at 1600m from firing lane.
However, the firing line of the range would be located over 2,000 in (6,500 ft, or 1.25 mi)
from the nearest off-base noise sensitive receptor. This would allow the noise from the
proposed range to attenuate (i.e. become quieter) over the distance between the firing line
and off-base noise receptors, helping to mitigate any potential noise impacts beyond MCB
Camp Lejeune's boundaries. In addition, the noise levels for inert rounds (blanks) would be
lower than noise levels associated with live fire rounds of the same caliber. Therefore, it is
anticipated that the noise impacts would be below the 85dBP threshold. Furthermore, the
communities of Verona, Haws Run and Padgett and the area known as Shelter Swamp are
over 6,000 in (19,680 ft or 3.7 miles) from the firing line. Therefore, no significant noise
impacts are anticipated with off-base noise receptors.
Based on the analyses above, the areas of Onslow County adjacent to the GSRA property
line would experience no change in noise levels and no changes in land use compatibility
because of the proposed action. Therefore, no noise impacts are predicted due to
implementing the proposed action.
Table 4-1: Predicted Peak Noise Levels for 5.56mm weapon, Live Fire
Distance
(meters from firing Predicted Level, dBP
Azimuth
lane) 00 90° 180°
50 135-150 112-127 102-117
100 113-128 106-121 95-110
200 106-121 99-114 89-104
400 93-108 86-101 78-93
800 85-100 77-92 69-84
1600 75-90 67-82 59-74

Ir __

L
C

FINAUJanuarY 20061 4-7 Environmental Consequences
!

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
Table 4-2: Predicted Peak Noise Levels for 7.62 mm weapon, Live Fire
Distance
(meters from firing lane) Predicted Level, dBP
Azimuth
0° 90° 180°
50 138-153 113-128 104-119
100 110-125 106-121 97-112
200 104-119 99-119 90-105
400 92-107 87-112 85-100
800 85-100 79-94 77-92
1600 76-91 70-85 68-83
Table 4-3: Predicted Peak Noise Levels for 50 cal weapon, Live Fire
Distance
(meters from firing Predicted Level, dBP
Azimuth
lane) 00 90° 180°
50 144-159 121-136 115-130
100 121-136 115-130 110-125
200 114-129 108-123 103-118
400 103-118 97-112 89-104
800 95-110 88-103 81-96
1600 87-102 79-94 73-88
Hede, A.J. and R.B. Bullen (1982), "Community reaction to noise from a
suburban rifle range," J. Sound and Vibration 82, 39-49.
4.6.2 No-Action Alternative
The decision not to build and operate the MPMG Range, the no-action alternative, would
have no noise impacts. Noise would continue to be generated around site SR-8 and the
GSRA because of current military training activities (small arms, aircraft, and ground
vehicles). Therefore, there would be no changes in the existing noise environment.
[FINAU January 2006]
4-8 Environmental Consequences
Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
ADNL Noise Contours for Proposed MPMG Ranae

Legend
65 dBA
75 dBA
GSRA Boundary
- MPMG Range SDZ
N
E
W +
Meters
0 5501,100 2,200 3,300 4,400 S
Figure 4-1 A-weighted DNL noise contours modeled for the proposed MPMG Range
and the existing ranges at GSRA (from CHHPM 2003b).
[FINAL/ January 2006] 4-9 Environmental Consequences

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
'
4.7 Cultural Resources
This section evaluates potential effects to cultural resources associated with constructing and
operating the MPMG Range. Factors considered when determining the potential for impacts
to cultural resources may include the extent or degree to which the proposed action would
diminish the integrity of the location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, or
association of a historic site.
4.7.1 Construct Range at SR-8
Archeological investigations of all soils at the GSRA having a moderate or high probability
of containing archeological remains have been completed. As agreed to in a January 2000
meeting between MCB Camp Lejeune personnel and the North Carolina SHPO, the survey
of the Juniper Swamp concludes the required archeological investigations at the GSRA (see
Appendix A, Determination of No Effect letter from NC SHPO dated 9 August 2005).
Therefore, no further cultural resource surveys are necessary and no impacts to cultural
resources are anticipated.
If any unanticipated artifacts or other cultural resources were encountered during
construction, work would cease and the Environmental Management Division at MCB
Camp Lejeune would be contacted to investigate and identify additional archaeological
survey requirements and mitigation measures that might be needed.
4.7.2 No-Action Alternative
The no-action alternative, to not construct and operate the MPMG would result in no
potential to impact any cultural resources. MCB Camp Lejeune would continue to manage
their cultural resources on-Base in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act
and related laws and regulations. The cultural resources staff at MCB Camp Lejeune would
continue to consult with the North Carolina SHPO on proposed actions that may affect on-
base historic or archeological resources.

4.8 Natural Resources
4.8.1 Topography and Soils
The minimization of soil erosion is considered when evaluating the potential impacts of the
proposed action. Generally, soil impacts can be avoided or minimized if proper construction
techniques and erosion control measures are incorporated into project design. The soil
composition at SR-8 consists of fine sands and loamy fine sands that have a low potential
for water and wind erosion (Geo-Marine, Inc. 2005).
4.8.1.1 Construct Range at SR-8
Construction of the MPMG Range would result in the direct disturbance of approximately
121 ha (300 ac) at the SR-8 site. Potential impacts could result from grading and filling the
[FINAUJanuary 2006] 4-10 Environmental Consequences

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
area in preparation for construction of the cantonment area and target emplacements;
digging trenches for utility lines; digging holes for building footings; and building gravel
roads along the range. There will also be some impacts to soil caused by the clearing,
grubbing and reseeding with lawn type grasses to reduce maintenance costs. During the
operation of the range, very minor soil-disturbing impacts could occur from bullets
impacting the ground, and vehicle and foot traffic in designated areas (roads, parking lot,
and cantonment area).
Soils erosion impacts due to the construction of the MPMG Range would be minor and
localized due to the areas flat terrain, sluggish water flow, and the soils low potential for
water and wind erosion. Mitigation measures would further reduce impacts. The
application of best management practices during construction would be implemented to
reduce potential impacts to soils. In addition, standard erosion control measures (e.g., silt
fencing, sediment traps, application of water sprays, and re-vegetation of disturbed soils)
would be implemented to further reduce potential impacts to soils during the construction
phase. Therefore, ground-disturbing activities during construction would result in only
short-term impacts to soils.
Soil impacts due to the operation of the MPMG Range would be minor and localize, and
mitigation measures would further reduce any effects. MCB Camp Lejeune has an active
soils and water conservation program which addresses erosion caused by training exercises.
No soil impacts are expected as a result of the day-to-day operations at the MPMG Range.
4.8.1.2 No-Action Alternative
Under the no-action alternative the MPMG Range would not be constructed. Soil impacts at
the GSRA would continue as a result of training activities at the existing ranges. Soil
impacts within the SR-8 site would be limited to light vehicle and foot traffic from MCB
Camp Lejeune personnel and hunters along existing roadways and paths. Timber harvest
activities would also cause manageable impacts on 60-80 year cycles within distinct parcels
of the SR-8 site (MCB Camp Lejeune 2001a). Therefore, there would be no changes in the
existing environment with respect to soil erosion.
4.8.2 Vegetation and Natural Communities
This section presents the analysis for potential impacts to vegetation and natural
communities from the implementation of the proposed action. Impacts to vegetation are
based on the proportion of a plant species affected, sensitivity of that species, and the
duration of those effects. Impacts to natural communities are primarily the result of the
fragmentation or permanent alteration of those communities.
The SR-8 site consists of 121 ha (300ac). Natural communities at the upland portion of the
site (approximately 59% or 70.9 ha, 176.2 ac) consists primarily of planted pine
monoculture and regenerated mixed pine woodlands as a result of the extensive timber
harvest in the GSRA prior to the acquisition by the Federal government. The wetland areas
(approximately 41% or 50.1 ha, 123.8 ac) of the SR-8 site consist of Palustrine broad-leaved
[FINAUJanuary 2006] 4-11 Environmental Consequences
l

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
1
deciduous and needle-leaved evergreen, and scrub-shrub broad-leaved evergreen and needle-
leaved evergreen.
4.8.2.1 Construct Range at SR-8
Potential impacts to vegetation and natural communities could result from clearing
vegetation in preparation for construction of the MPMG Range and maintaining the
cantonment and CZ areas of the range. The proposed CZ consists of approximately 121 ha
(300 ac). However, the entire range fan (CZ and SDZ) consists of approximately 323 ha
(800 ac) would have to be maintained in low-growth phase.
Clearing the site would be accomplished by first harvesting marketable timber, and then a
combination of bush hogging, drum-chopping, and controlled burning, followed by site
grading and herbicide applications as prescribed by standard operating procedures.
Maintenance of vegetation on the proposed range would consist of mowing, drum-chopping,
controlled burning, and herbicide applications as prescribed by standard operating
procedures. These procedures will maintain the vegetation within the range fan in an early
successional stage.
The GSRA has been harvested for timber since the 1940's. The range fan, a 323 ha (800 ac)
tract, makes up a 2.2% of the 14,165 ha (35,000 ac) GSRA. Therefore, the maintenance of
vegetation in an early successional stage at site SR-8 would not cause a significant change in
vegetation or community type. Furthermore, the clearing of this area does not pose any
significant fragmentation of habitats since the habitats contained within the site are the same
habitats that make up the rest of the GSRA. Therefore, no impacts to vegetation are
anticipated as a result of range clearing and maintenance.
4.8.2.2 No-Action Alternative
The decision to not build and operate the MPMG Range would result in no additional
impacts to vegetation at site SR-8. Minimal impacts to vegetation at the GSRA would
continue due to the maintenance and training operations at the current ranges. Periodic
timber harvests occur on 60-80 year cycle as prescribed in the R4RMP.

4.8.3 Forest Management
4.8.3.1 Timber Management
Potential impacts to silviculture could result from retracting a large area from timber
harvest, affecting approved silviculture policies and practices, or actions that decrease the
health or harvest potential of the standing timber. Silviculture is managed on-base
according to MCB Camp Lejeune's INRMP (MCB Camp Lejeune 2001).
i 4.8.3.1.1 Construct Range at SR-8
Constructing the MPMG Range (P-034) at SR-8 could cause potential impacts to the
silviculture program at MCB Camp Lejeune if a large amount of land is withdrawn from
timber production. The entire range fan, approximately 322 ha (800 ac), will be maintained

[FINAUJanuary 2006] 4-12 Environmental Consequences

t
Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune '
in a low-growth phase to facilitate visibility of the range targets. Most of the GSRA was
harvested prior to the federal government's acquisition in 1991 (LANTDIV 1991), and
therefore much of the timber at site SR-8 is in the early stages of production.
The construction of the MPMG Range would include the clearing of approximately 322 ha ,
(800 ac) of mostly loblolly and slash pine plantations, approximately 25 year old trees.
Once harvested, this area would then be permanently removed from timber production. The
GSRA is approximately 16,592 ha (41,000 ac) in size, with 14,164 ha (35,000 ac)
considered forested. Of that 14,164 ha (35,000 ac), approximately 7,285 ha (18,000 ac)
support commercial forestry. Therefore, the proposed project area of 322 ha (800 ac) at SR-
8 represent about 2 % of the total timber production area at GSRA as a whole, which does ,
not represent a large withdrawal of land from timber production. Furthermore, the
development of ranges for military training is the primary purpose of the GSRA (LANTDIV
1991). No impacts to the silviculture program at MCB Camp Lejeune would result from
constructing and operating the MPMG Range at site SR-8.
4.8.3.1.2 No Action Alternative
The no-action alternative, to not construct and operate the MPMG Range (P-034), would
result in no impacts to the silviculture program at MCB Camp Lejeune. Forestry programs
at site SR-8 and the rest of the GSRA would continue to be managed in accordance with the
MCB Camp Lejeune INRMP (MCB Camp Lejeune 2001).
4.8.3.2 Wildland Fire
The severity of wildland fire impacts are judged based on the increased risk to military
personnel or the public due to increased wildfire potential caused by implementing the
proposed action. Increasing the sources of ignition, increasing the fuel load in the area, or
not implementing proper wildland fire management all are factors that increase the fire
potential.
4.8.3.2.1 Construct Range at SR-8
Potential wildland fire impacts could result from operating the MPMG Range at site SR-8
due to the increase in ignition sources from training. The area under the site is composed
mostly of peat, which if ignited, can burn for extended periods of time and produce large
volumes of smoke that have the potential to effect human health.
MCB Camp Lejeune would take a number of steps to prevent wildfires and contain fires that
do start. During the fire season (March through September), Range Control Officer and
Base Forestry Management personnel will issue training restrictions when fire potential is
significant. For example, the use of pyrotechnics and incinerary munitions may be
restricted to specific areas when fire potential is very high. (MCB Camp Lejeune 2003b)
Wildland fire management efforts for MCB Camp Lejeune are outlined in the INRMP
(MCB Camp Lejeune 2001). Prescribed burns are currently conducted at GSRA to reduce
the fire potential, and these efforts would continue in and around the MPMG Range to
reduce fuel loads. A road would be built around the perimeter and across the SR-8 site in
several places to act as a firebreak and provide access to firefighting personnel and vehicles.
[FINAUJanuary 2006] 4-13 Environmental Consequences

1
I Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
Although there is the potential for wildland fire impacts due implementing the proposed
action, Standard Operating Procedures, range-specific measures, and continued
implementation of the INRMP (MCB Camp Lejeune 2001) would reduce the risk of serious
wildfires. Training activities at the MPMG range would not significantly increase the risk to
human safety or the environment from fire.
4.8.3.2.2 No Action Alternative
The no-action alternative, to not build and operate the MPMG Range (P-034), would result
in no increased risk to human health or the environment as a result of wildland fire. Safety
risks resulting from currently operating ranges at the GSRA will continue to be managed
through Standard Operating Procedures, range-specific measures, and continued
implementation of the 1NRMP (MCB Camp Lejeune 2001).

4.8.4 Wildlife
Determination of the significance of potential impacts to wildlife resources are based on the
importance of the resource, the proportion of the resource that would be affected relative to
its occurrence in the area, the sensitivity of the resource to proposed activities, and the
duration of effects. Impacts to wildlife resources are considered significant if species or
habitats of concern are adversely affected over relatively large areas or disturbances result in
reductions in the population size or distribution of that species.

4.8.4.1 Construct Range at SR-8
Potential impacts to wildlife at site SR-8 in the GSRA could result from clearing and
grading during construction of the MPMG Range, the stress associated with increased
human presence during training activities at the range, and the maintenance of the range
targetry and vegetation.

n

1
Construction activities associated with building the MPMG Range at site SR-8 would
temporarily displace wildlife from suitable habitat in the immediate vicinity of the project
area. Smaller, less mobile species and those seeking refuge in burrows could inadvertently
be injured and possibly be killed during construction activities; however, the project area
encompasses only small proportions of the habitats represented at the GSRA. Most
misplaced species would be expected to recolonize the area after the construction activities
are complete. Therefore, impacts to populations of such species or their habitats would not
result.
Operation of the MPMG Range would mean an increase in human presence and the periodic
intense use of military hardware and weapons. This may drive some wildlife from the CZ of
the MPMG Range into other suitable habitat within the GSRA. The CZ of the MPMG
Range represents only a small proportion (about 0.7%) of the natural habitat within the
GSRA. Some animals, as noted on other ranges, are expected to adapt and take up
residence within the range. There would be no alteration of habitat or disruption of natural
areas encompassed by the SDZ. Therefore, range operations are not expected to impact
[FINAUJanuary 2006] 4-14 Environmental Consequences

I'
Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune '
wildlife within the MPMG Range SDZ, and only minor impacts would occur to wildlife
within the CZ.
Maintenance of the proposed MPMG Range would consist of mowing, drum-chopping,
controlled burns and herbicide application to maintain the vegetation in a low-growing, early
successional state. While the alteration of habitat at site SR-8 may displace some species,
other species such as the white-tailed deer, bobwhite quail, and wild turkey prefer early-
successional and forest-edge habitat that this project would create. The shift from a
managed timber monoculture to the maintenance of vegetation in an early successional state
would add to habitat diversity within the GSRA. Therefore, maintenance of the CZ would
not cause any significant impacts to wildlife in the immediate area of the MPMG Range.
Herbicide application would be performed in accordance with standard operating
procedures. Most herbicides have shown little to no toxicity in mammals, birds, fish,
invertebrates, or algae; breaks down in 2-174 days in soil and less than seven days in
oxygenated water; and is not considered a hazardous waste by the Resources, Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) (MONSANTO Company 2001). No direct impacts to wildlife

would result from using herbicide at the SR-8 site. '
Construction, operation, and maintenance of the MPMG Range would not result in any
impacts to wildlife. ,
4.8.4.2 No Action Alternative
The decision not to build the MPMG Range would result in no development of site SR-8,
and therefore no additional impacts to wildlife. Wildlife management outlined in the MCB
Camp Lejeune INRMP (MCB Camp Lejeune 2001) would continue to affect wildlife in the
area through game and non-game species programs, as well as the forest management
program including silviculture and prescribed burning.

4.8.5 Threatened and Endangered Species
Impacts to threatened and endangered species would occur if a listed species was injured,
killed, or otherwise harassed; if the critical habitat of a listed species was destroyed; or if the
listed species' population was jeopardized. Avoiding areas that contain threatened and
endangered species would minimize potential impacts. Proposed actions that "may effect"
Federally listed Threatened and Endangered species would require Section 7 consultation
under the Endangered Species Act with USFWS and/or NMFS.
4.8.5.1 Construct Range at SR-8 '
Effects to threatened and endangered species and their habitat due to the building and
operation of the MPMG Range could result from clearing and grading land in preparation
for construction, or from the displacement of listed species from the project area. Areas
containing listed species would be avoided where possible and any potential effects would
be managed in accordance with the MCB Camp Lejeune INRMP (MCB Camp Lejeune
2001).
[FINAUJanuary 2006] 4-15 Environmental Consequences
Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
1
' Rough-leaved loosestrife (RLL) is the only known Federally threatened or endangered
species identified at the GSRA According to the RLL site characterization (Geo-Marine,
Inc. 2005), it is reasonable to assume that potential habitat for RLL occurs within the SR-8
site. High probability habitat for RLL borders a very small portion of the SR-8 site along a
' 100-meter transect on the downrange (northwest) boundary of the Range CZ. High
probability habitat was surveyed for RLL and no occurrences were found within the SR-8
site. Therefore, there would be no direct impacts to RLL populations (TenBrink 2005).
Activities at the range to keep vegetation maintained in a low, early-successional state
would actually provide suitable habitat for RLL that prefers a fire-maintained environment.
MCB Camp Lejeune natural resources staff would continue to implement the measures
' described in the WRMP (MCB Camp Lejeune 2001) to manage and preserve known
populations of RLL. There would be no adverse effects to the federally endangered RLL as
a result of constructing and operating the MPMG Range at SR-8.
Federally endangered red-cockaded woodpeckers inhabit parts of MCB Camp Lejeune, but
' no birds have been observed in the GSRA. Prior to government acquisition, timber harvests
removed mature pine stands necessary to support habitat for RCW nesting and foraging.
(EDAW, Inc. 1998). Therefore, the proposed action has no potential to impact the
endangered RCWs within MCB Camp Lejeune.
The Carolina goldenrod is considered endangered by the state of NC, and considered to be a
species of concern at the Federal level. This plant is found within the power-line easements
around the GSRA, but there is no known occurrence within the SR-8 site, and therefore
there will be no direct effects to communities of this species. As with RLL, keeping the
vegetation maintained in a low, early-successional state would provide additional suitable
habitat for this species that prefers a fire-maintained environment.
The American alligator potentially may be found in the GSRA, although this animal is listed
as Federally threatened only because of its similarity of appearance to the American
crocodile, which is in fact threatened. American crocodiles would not be found in the
GSRA because these reptiles require a warmer climate than that of Eastern NC. Florida
represents the northern extent of the American Crocodile's range. Alligators may be
encountered in or near waterways of the GSRA but none of these areas are part of the SR-8
site. Therefore, there would be no potential impacts to American alligators.
¦ During 2004 plant survey, a specimen of pondberry was located in the southwestern GSRA.
The pondberry is a Federally listed endangered plant species that prefers interior wetland
habitats. Unfortunately, the surveyed population of pondberry could not be relocated in
subsequent field investigations. The alleged location of the pondberry is about 8 km (5
miles) away from the proposed project site. It is possible but highly unlikely that pondberry
' would occur within the proposed MPMG project site at SR-8. (TenBrink 2005)
Construction, operation, and maintenance of the proposed MPMG range would have no
adverse impacts to any Federal or state listed species.

[FINAUJanuary 2006] 4-16 Environmental Consequences

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
4.8.5.2 No-Action Alternative
The no-action alternative, not to build and operate the MPMG Range (P-034), would cause
no impacts to threatened and endangered species within the SR-8 site or the GSRA.
Potential impacts to threatened and endangered species aboard MCB Camp Lejeune would
continue to be managed in accordance with the INRMP (MCB Camp Lejeune 2001).
4.8.6 Floodplains
Impacts of flood hazards on proposed actions would be significant if such actions are
proposed in areas with high probabilities of flooding. Impacts could include potential for
flood damage to facilities and the reduction of water holding capacity within the floodplain.
4.8.6.1 Construct Range at SR-8
Potential impacts could result from the construction of buildings (operations/storage
building, general instruction building, ammunition breakdown building, etc.) in flood-prone
areas, endangering those facilities. Impacts to floodplains could occur as a result of fill soil
and dirt, reducing its water holding capacity.
The proposed project site, SR-8, is located entirely within the 100-year floodplain (EDAW,
Inc. 1998) which indicates this area is prone to flooding in extreme conditions. However,
the 100-year floodplain designations do not account for unique hydrological conditions such
as those found in the GSRA. The pocosins help to control water levels in the GSRA during
rain events; their peat layers soak up rainwater and release it slowly over time. Furthermore,
the facilities, firing line, and most of the targets will be located along Moore's Ridge, a
natural feature of the GSRA that has a slightly higher elevation than the surrounding area.
In general, flooding is not a major problem in the GSRA and therefore, no impacts to the
proposed action are anticipated as a result of its location in a designated floodplain.
The filling and grading of land in preparation for the construction of the MPMG Range
could result in impacts to floodplains by reducing their holding capacity. Measures taken to
reduce impacts to wetlands by minimizing the amount of filling, described in section 4.9.3,
would also reduce potential impacts to floodplains since wetlands in this area are also
considered floodplains. Minor filling of floodplains would not cause any reduction in the
water holding capacity of the area, and therefore would not cause impacts to floodplains. A
detailed review of the floodplain effects would be conducted during the design and
engineering of the MPMG Range.
4.8.6.2 No-Action Alternative
The no-action alternative, to not construct and operate the MPMG Range, would have no
impacts to floodplains at site SR-8. No facilities would be built and therefore no buildings
could potentially be impacted by floodwaters. The likelihood of flooding at other facilities
located in 100-year floodplains at the GSRA would not change.
[FINAUJanuary 2006] 4-17 Environmental Consequences

J

0
r

FJ

u

0

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
4.9 Water Resources
Impacts to water resources could potentially occur if the proposed action causes
contamination or sedimentation of nearby waters; endangers the health of the public or
environment; or violates established laws or regulations.
4.9.1 Construct Range at SR-8
Potential impacts to water resources as a result of building and operating the MPMG Range
could result from the sedimentation due to ground disturbance, an increase in impervious
surfaces increasing runoff, and application of vegetation controls. Effects can be mitigated
through Best Management Practices and application of MCB Camp Lejeune's soils and
water conservation programs. Additionally, the SR-8 site is not extensively ditched and
contains no major watercourses, which further reduces the potential for water resource
impacts.
Loosening of soils associated with filling and grading the site, removal of vegetation, and
training exercises could increase erosion and therefore sediment in storm water runoff. An
increase in the impervious surfaces reduces the amount of area available to absorb water and
allows storm water runoff to flow unimpeded, thereby further inducing erosion. The area of
impervious surfaces will be limited at the MPMG Range; roads and parking surfaces will be
graveled and not paved thereby minimizing the erosion effects caused by impervious
surfaces.
The introduction of sediment into nearby surface waters and wetlands could present a
concern especially during the construction phase of the MPMG Range. Proper design,
incorporating Best Management Practices during construction and operation of the proposed
range, would minimize impacts to surface water. MCB Camp Lejeune has an active soils
and water conservation program which addresses potential erosion problems caused by
training activities. Measures such as including vegetative buffers and berms will slow storm
water runoff, increase absorption, and direct water flow away from sensitive areas, thereby
mitigating impacts to water resources. When mitigation is considered, impacts to surface
water resources due to erosion/sedimentation would not be significant.
The construction of the proposed MPMG Range would disturb more that 2 ha (5 ac) of land
and therefore would require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Permit for storm water. Because Onslow County is considered a coastal county in North
Carolina, additional requirements may apply such as a State Stormwater Certificate and an
approved sedimentation control plan.
Due to the low potential for erosion and mitigation measures that would be implemented for
the proposed range, the impacts to water quality would be manageable with current MCB
Camp Lejeune land management practices.
4.9.2 No-Action Alternative
The decision not to build and operate the MPMG Range (P-034) would result in no new
impacts to water quality within the SR-8 site. Potential impacts to water quality would
[FINAUJanuary 2006] 4-18 Environmental Consequences

I
Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune 1
continue as a result of the similar, currently operating ranges and facilities at GSRA,
although these effects are mitigated as part of current land management practices. '
4.9.3 Wetlands
This section evaluates the potential impacts to wetlands due to constructing and operating a '
MPMG Range at site SR-8. Impacts to wetlands occur when these areas are filled, dredged,
drained, or otherwise lose their characteristics and/or functionality. Wetlands are primarily '
protected through the Clean Water Act (CWA) of 1977, as Amended (Public Law 95-217,
33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.). A Section 404 Permit from the USACE, Federal Consistency
Determination Concurrence and a North Carolina Section 401 Certification would be '
required for filling, dredging, or otherwise destroying wetlands. Impacts to wetlands must
be avoided, minimized, or mitigated.
4.9.3.1 Construct Range at SR-8 '
Building and operating the MPMG Range could cause unavoidable impacts to wetlands due
to constructing facilities/buildings and clearing vegetation. Every effort would be made to
avoid wetland impacts by placing facilities, buildings, targets, and gravel roads in upland
areas when practicable. Wetland impacts that cannot be avoided would be mitigated for
within the GSRA wetland mitigation bank as negotiated with the USACE and NCDENR '
during the wetland permitting process.
The GSRA Acquisition FEIS (LANTDIV 1991) and subsequent documents such as the '
GSRA Master Development Plan Update (EDAW, Inc. 1998) examined wetlands in the
GSRA and tried to identify range placements that in part, minimize impacts to wetlands.
During the preliminary investigations for this project, several sites were investigated for the
placement of the MPMG Range to minimize impacts to wetlands. In the final design stages '
of the range complex, the targetry, buildings, facilities, and gravel roads within the 121 ha
(300 ac) SR-8 site would be placed to further avoid impacts to wetlands.
Construction of the MPMG Range would require the disturbance of 29.66 ha (73.28 ac) of '
wetlands. A Section 404 Permit from the USACE, Federal Consistence Determination
Concurrence and a North Carolina Section 401 Certification would be required. The total '
area of wetland mitigation required would be negotiated with the USACE and NCDENR.
The decision as to what constitutes "appropriate" mitigation is based on the values and
functions of the aquatic resources that would be impacted. Mitigation for the unavoidable '
wetland impacts would be accomplished in the GSRA Wetlands Mitigation Bank.
Vegetative clearing would be performed mechanically.

FINAUJanuarY 20061 4-19 Environmental Consequences '
i
Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
Table 4-4 Summary of wetlands disturbed for the construction of proposed MPMG Range.
Wetlands
Type Area
(Hectare) Fill
(m3) Cut
(m3) Area
(Acres) Fill
(yds3) Cut
(yds3)
PF04/SS3 11.76 61,191 4,525 29.05 80,035 5,918
SS4 0.00 0 5 0.01 0 7
PF01/4/SS3 9.60 45,065 1,751 23.71 58,943 2,290
PSS3/PF01 0.06 92 0 0.14 120 0
PF04 4.29 14,935 935 10.60 19,534 1,223
PFO1 3.95 22,330 62 9.76 29,207 81
TOTAL 29.66 143,613 7,278 73.28 187,839 9,519
Calculations provided by USACE Engineering and Support Center for Range Design in Huntsville Alabama, Aug 2005

R?
?? 1 ? i ? iv,sT6lK^ it Ir a'.

i. Iyy 4 'r•`w'
b aY.,Y + f

[FINAL/ January 2006] 4-20 Environmental Consequences
Figure 4-2 MPMG Range Design with the Jurisdictional Wetlands Delineation at SR-8

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
4.9.3.2 No-Action Alternative
The decision not to build the proposed MPMG Range (P-034) would lead to no development
at site SR-8 and therefore no wetlands would be impacted. Impacts to wetlands within the
GSRA would continue to be permitted, and adequate mitigation agreed upon, by local, state,
and federal agencies.
4.10 Hazardous Materials Management
Impacts associated with hazardous materials and wastes are considered significant if the
storage, use, transportation, or disposal of these substances increases human health risks or
environmental exposure.
4.10.1 Construct Range at SR-8
Constructing and operating the MPMG Range (P-034) at site SR-8 could result in potential
hazardous materials impacts to humans or the environment due to hindering ongoing
installation restoration cleanup efforts or contaminating the environment as a result of
training activities. General and range-specific Standard Operating Procedures would be
implemented prior to the operation of the MPMG Range and, in part, would outline
measures to reduce the potential for contamination on the range complex.
No existing contamination has been discovered near site SR-8 and therefore there is no
potential to impact installation restoration sites or other cleanup efforts.
There would be no vehicles involved directly in the training exercises at the proposed
MPMG Range. The range complex would contain a small gravel parking area for personal
vehicles and busses. No hazardous materials or petroleum products would be stored at the
MPMG Range. Therefore, it is unlikely that any environmental contamination would result
at the MPMG Range.
Only authorized ammunition would be used at the MPMG Range. Any metal contamination
would be negligible due to the dispersion of rounds over the large SDZ and the low
solubility of these solid metals. Furthermore, the Final Military Munitions Rule (40 CFR
Parts 260-266 and 270) states when military munitions are used for their intended purpose
(i.e. training), they are not considered hazardous waste for regulatory purposes, even if the
intended purpose results in the deposit of munitions on land. Therefore, the munitions that
would be used at he MPMG Range would not cause impacts to the environment or conflict
with any existing regulations.
4.10.2 No-Action Alternative
The no-action alternative, namely to not construct and operate the MPMG Range, would
result in no hazardous materials impacts at site SR-8. Within the GSRA, potential
hazardous material impacts result from usage of the current ranges would remain
unchanged. MCB Camp Lejeune would continue to manage all hazardous materials in
compliance with all federal, state, and local laws.
[FINAL/ January 2006] 4-21 Environmental Consequences

r?

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune

' 4.11 Safety
This section evaluates potential safety impacts associated with operating the MPMG Range
(P-034). Safety impacts would occur if implementation of the proposed action would
' substantially increase risks to the public or military personnel.
4.11.1 Construct Range at SR-8
' Building and operating the MPMG Range would provide live-fire training facilities for
required military training scenarios utilizing machine guns. Safety and standard operating
procedures exist for these weapons and tactics and are in use throughout the Marine Corps,
including the present training facilities at MCB Camp Lejeune. If the MPMG Range were
constructed at site SR-8, site-specific procedures would be developed for the individual
range operations, as required by Marine Corps regulations (MCO 3570.1B/DA PAM 385-63
' and Base Order BO P3570. 1A).
The target placement and SDZ would be located to minimize potential safety conflicts with
existing ranges. Vegetation would be maintained for visibility of targetry and range limit
markers. The GSRA currently has "No Trespassing" signs posted along the boundary at
200-foot intervals prohibiting entrance by unauthorized personnel. Restricted airspace
bounds the GSRA and encompasses all the ordnance impact areas and the helicopter training
areas. Prior to range operation, the SDZ would have additional warning signs, barriers, and
range guards, as required by Marine Corps regulations.

With these standard safety procedures and site-specific safety precautions in place, there
would be no increase in safety risks to the public or military personnel resulting from the
' operation of the MPMG Range at SR-8.
4.11.2 No-Action Alternative
The no-action alternative, not to construct and operate the MPMG Range (P-034), would
result in no increased safety risk to the public or military personnel. Safety concerns would
remain unchanged, resulting from training activities at current GSRA ranges.

' 4.12 Cumulative Impacts
In assessing the regional cumulative effects, the proposed MPMG Range (P-034) and
reasonably foreseeable future projects within the GSRA were considered and analyzed. The
' original plan to build ten ranges at the GSRA presented in the Acquisition EIS (LANTDIV
1991) has been scaled back due to concerns over range maintenance, safety and wetlands.
According to the Range Transformation Plan for 2020 (MCB Camp Lejeune 2001b), there
' is potential for additional range projects to take place at MCB Camp Lejeune. Besides the
proposed MPMG Range (P-034), the subject of this EA, these projects are as follows:
• Modernization and Realignment of K-2 Ranges
• Construct Military Operations in Urban Terrain (MOUT) at Camp Davis (P-1074)
[FINAUJanuary 2006] 4-22 Environmental Consequences

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
• Construct Landing Forces Operations Center (LFOC) Trainer at GSRA (P-1076) '
• Construct Infantry Platoon Battle Course (IPBC) at GSRA (P-032)
In addition, there are projects in early conceptual design for relocating Navy and Marine
Corps Reserve Units to Stone Bay area and GSRA. And, USMC is proposing to conduct
chaff and flare training at G-10 Impact Area, K2 Impact Area and GSRA SR-10.
These projects are "reasonably foreseeable actions", and are in the conceptual stage. With
respect to future development in the GSRA, there would be a requirement to accurately
identify and assess the potential impacts of the contemplated projects. The actual locations
of and the potential environmental impacts from these projects would be analyzed in
accordance with NEPA once the projects each reach the proposal stage. The planned
concept for the GSRA is to minimize adverse impacts to Threatened and Endangered
species, cultural resources, and ecologically sensitive areas.
This EA discusses three types of cumulative impacts that are expected to occur as a result of
past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions, including this proposed action.
4.12.1 Weapons-Related Noise
Cumulative noise impacts resulting from weapons firing activities were analyzed in
Environmental Noise Contours for Proposed P034 Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range, U.S.
Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina dated 25 March 2003 and Addendums
dated 27 August 2003 and 30 December 2003 (CHPPM 2003a, 2003b, and 2003c
respectively). This analysis incorporates the currently operating firing ranges at SR-6, SR-7,
SR-10, and SR-11, as well as noise model predictions from the proposed MPMG Range (P-
034) at site SR-8. Noise contours using ADNL noise metric were generated for the current
ranges and proposed action at the GSRA. In June 2005, the noise study modeled the noise
impacts associated with existing and future base-wide large caliber weapons noise contours
(CHPPM, June 2005). In this study CDNL contours were predicted by applying a 15
percent growth factor to the CY2005 baseline data. It is expected that using a 15 percent
growth factor in the noise modeling would reflect cumulative noise effects from the majority
of training operations for the existing year (2005) as well as for future years.
Reasonably foreseeable future projects in the GSRA training areas were considered for this
cumulative impacts analysis. Modernizing and realigning the current ranges or constructing
and operating the LFOC trainer would not increase the noise levels because these projects
involve no additional rounds being fired or maneuverings. The noise from the training
exercises at the proposed MOUT at Camp Davis (P-1074) in the southern GSRA was not
modeled. The construction and operation of the new MOUT would not be expected to
increase the noise environment in the northern GSRA due to the distance between these two
locations and predominate use of small arms. Furthermore, Camp Davis is already an active
helicopter landing area and utilized for training; therefore, any future enhancements to this
training environment would not significantly increase noise over current levels.
[FINAL/January2006] .423 Environmental Consequences
7

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
The analysis of noise for the proposed action in section 4.6 of this document also represents
' the impacts from current and reasonably foreseeable future training facilities at the GSRA.
Beyond MCB Camp Lejeune's property, noise would remain similar or increase slightly
over current levels according to the conservative model predictions (CHPPM 2003b, 2003c
' and 2005). Noise sensitive land use planning zones would remain similar to their current
configurations. No cumulative noise impacts are anticipated beyond the GSRA property due
to current or reasonably foreseeable future training areas.

4.12.2 Wetlands

The Acquisition EIS (LANTDIV 1991) estimated that wetland impacts would occur as part
of the planned development of the GSRA. Extensive monitoring and wetlands analysis
conducted after the EIS was completed revealed that a much larger area of the GSRA than
anticipated consisted of wetlands. Impacts associated with previous development projects
were mitigated through MCB Camp Lejeune's wetland mitigation bank located within the
GSRA. In the past years, USACE has issued six individual permits for GSRA projects.
Permitted wetlands impacts ranged from 9.51 acres for SR-6 Infantry Range (P-028) to 74
acres for SR-10 Tank Range (P-933). Of the total available 1,250 wetlands credits, only 634
are presently approved for use. To date, 484 credits have been used leaving 150 available
credits. The impacts from constructing the proposed MPMG Range (P-034) would result in
an additional 29.66 ha (73.28 ac) of wetland impacts.
It is reasonable to believe that reasonably foreseeable future actions, the construction of the
MOUT at Camp Davis, the Infantry Platoon Battle Course (P-032) and the LFOC Trainer,
would also necessitate the filling of some wetlands within the GSRA. The exact area of
impacts would be judged during the final design phases and coordination with the USACE
through the permit application process would result in appropriate mitigation measures.
There could be additional wetland impacts associated with any of the reasonably foreseeable
future projects listed in section 4.12 above. The Acquisition EIS (LANTDIV 1991)
acknowledged that each range would be individually addressed as it reached the planning
stages. The actual amount of wetland impacts will not be known until the design of each
facility is complete and a wetland delineation is conducted. Overall, the development of the
GSRA is conducted with the underlying policy of avoidance, minimization, and mitigation
of wetlands through planning and design.
4.13 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
Constructing the MPMG Range (P-034) would result in minor unavoidable impacts. These
impacts would include localized noise and air emissions from construction machinery and
temporary disturbance of soils at facility locations, along roads, and utility burial trenches.
Long-term changes in vegetation cover would occur within the CZ of the MPMG Range. In
addition, construction of the proposed range could result in the loss of wetlands at site SR-8.
However these losses would be mitigated through the GSRA Wetland Mitigation Bank, as
negotiated with the USACE and NCDENR during the wetland permitting process.
[FINAUJanuary 2006] 4-24 Environmental Consequences

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
Operating and maintaining the MPMG Range would result in minor unavoidable adverse
impacts. These impacts would include localized increases in noise levels due to live-fire
training, sporadic damage to vegetation within the SDZ due to impacting ordnance, and
displacement of some species of wildlife from the immediate vicinity of SR-8 due to
increased human presence.
4.14 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitments of
Resources
The proposed action would result in the use of approximately 121 ha (300 ac) of land in the
GSRA. Additionally, the construction the MPMG Range and associated facilities would
expend fuel, construction materials, and labor. Total construction costs, not including the
value of the land, are approximately $6 million.
4.15 Relationship between Local Short-Term Uses of the
Environment and the Enhancement of Long-Term
Productivity
NEPA requires an analysis of the relationship between a project's short-term impacts on the
environment, and the effects that these impacts may have on the maintenance and
enhancement of the long-term productivity of the affected environment. Impacts that
narrow the range of beneficial uses of the environment are of particular concern. Short-term
uses of the environment are those that occur over a period of less than the life of the
proposed action. Long-term uses include those impacts that would persist for a period of
five years or more, or for the life of the proposed action.
Implementation of the proposed action would result in both short-term environmental effects
and long-term productivity. Short-term effects would be primarily related to construction
activities involving the additional use of vehicles and equipment. Proposed construction
activities would result in facility improvements that would enhance the long-term
effectiveness of training Marines in small arms weapons proficiency. Construction of the
proposed range would occur in an area that is relatively undisturbed; however,
implementation would not result in impacts on sensitive resources. As a result, it is not
anticipated that the proposed action would result in any environmental impacts that would
permanently narrow the range of beneficial uses of the environment or pose long-term risks
to health, safety, or the general welfare of the public.
4.16 Mitigation Measures
MCB Camp Lejeune would implement the following measures during the construction and
operation of the proposed MPMG Range (P-034):
• Wetlands would be avoided and minimized when possible. If it is necessary to fill
wetlands, wetland permits would be obtained and any mitigation required by the
permits would be implemented. Wetlands that must be filled would be compensated
[FINAUJanuary 2006] 4-25 Environmental Consequences

7
L

1
[1

I

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune

for with credits from the GSRA Wetland Mitigation Bank as negotiated with the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers and NCDENR during the wetlands permitting process.
• State-approved erosion and sedimentation control plans would be obtained if
' necessary for any construction activities.
• If any unanticipated artifacts or other cultural resources are encountered during
construction, work would cease and the MCB Camp Lejeune Environmental
Management Division would be contacted to investigate and identify additional
archaeological survey requirements and mitigation measures that might be needed.
l
id
C
l
i
d
d be avo
onsu
tat
on
• Threatened and endangered species and their habitat wou
e
.
with USFWS would be conducted if there were any chance to affect any federally
' listed threatened or endangered species.
• The project site will be delineated with markings, flagging, or other suitable material
prior to the beginning of construction to avoid impacting resources outside of the
immediate project footprint.
' • Permanent signage would be placed around the proposed MPMG Range to identify
sensitive resource areas to avoid impacting these areas during operation and
maintenance activities.
ld b
t
d
it
N
h
i
l
t
l
d
t
•
e s
ore
on-s
o weapons, c
em
ca
s, or pe
ro
eum pro
uc
s wou
e.
Ammunition would not be permanently stored at the MPMG Range, but would be
distributed from the ammunition breakdown building during training events. This
would avoid potential safety impacts in the area associated with permanently storing
ordnance.
Although not triggered by the proposed action evaluated in this EA, MCB Camp Lejeune is
actively pursuing measures to prevent and/or mitigate encroachment by future residential
' development and other land uses incompatible with its ranges. These measures include:
• On-going range management planning activities to effectively and efficiently utilize
and maintain existing range assets to meet the military mission.
• Participation in a Joint Land Use Study (JLUS) with Onslow County. The study will
identify key areas around the installation boundaries with the potential for
incompatible development. Onslow County could then use the findings of this study
to develop zoning restrictions, which would limit incompatible development.
t • Partnering with other interested stakeholders (e.g., state and federal land managers,
conservation organizations and community groups) to promote sustainable land use
' and ecosystem conservation in encroachment-sensitive areas around the installation.

!FINAL/January 20061 4-26 Environmental Consequences

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
5 REFERENCES
CH2M Hill and Baker Environmental. 2003. Site Management Plan for MCB Camp
Lejeune.
Davis, Gary. Planning Division, NAVFACENGCOM, Atlantic Division. February 1, 1999.
Personal communication by telephone with Jim Kawchak of TAMS Consultants, Inc.
EarthTech/TAMS. 2003. Environmental Assessment for the Sale of Potable Water to
Onslow Water and Sewer Authority by Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, Onslow
County, North Carolina.
EDAW, Inc. 1994. Greater Sandy Run Master Development Plan.
EDAW Inc. 1998. GSRA Master Development Plan Update, Marine Corps Base, Camp
Lejeune, North Carolina.
Geo-Marine, Inc. 2005. Wetland Delineation P-034 Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range,
Greater Sandy Run Area, Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, Jacksonville, North
Carolina.
Holland Consulting Planners, Inc. 1998. Onslow County Land Use Plan.
Louis Berger and Associates, Inc. 1994a. Historic Structure Survey, Greater Sandy Run
Acquisition Area, Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina.
Louis Berger and Associates, Inc. 1994b. Archeological Survey, Greater Sandy Run
Acquisition Area, Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina.
MCB Camp Lejeune. 1988. Land and Training Area Requirements Study (LA TAR).
MCB Camp Lejeune. 2001a. Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan (INRMP)
MCB Camp Lejeune, North Carolina.
MCB Camp Lejeune. 2001b. Range Transformation Plan for 2020.
MCB Camp Lejeune. 2002a. Strategic Plan, MCB Camp Lejeune.
MCB Camp Lejeune. 2002b. DD Form 1391, FY06 Military Construction Program for P-
034, Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range.
MCB Camp Lejeune. 2003a. Economic Impacts 2003. Prepared by: Comptroller Department
and Training Support Division, MCB Camp Lejeune.
[FINAUJanuary 2006]
5-1
List of Preparers

I?
U

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
MCB Camp Lejeune. 2003b. Standing Operating Procedures for Range Control, Base
Order BO P3570. ]A dated 29 April 2003. Provided by Range Control Division,
MCB Camp Lejeune.
MCB Camp Lejeune. 2005a. Letter regarding: Ground Training Noise Guidance for
Marine Corps Installations, issued by Headquarters United States Marine Corp,
Assistant Deputy Commandant, Installations and Logistics (Facilities) dated 29 June
2005.
MCB Camp Lejeune. 2005b. Wetland Mitigation Bank Acreage Accounting Sheet as of
August 2005. Provided by: Martin Korenek, Wildlife Biologist, Land and Wildlife
Resources Section, Environmental Conservation Branch, Environmental
Management Division, Installations and Environment Department, Marine Corps
Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina.
Monsanto Company. 2001. Material Safety Data Sheet for RODEOS Emerged Aquatic
' Weed and Brush Herbicide.
Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Atlantic Division (LANTDIV). 1991. Proposed
Expansion and Realignment of the Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, Onslow
' County, North Carolina (Acquisition EIS).
Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Atlantic Division (LANTDIV). 1994.
Environmental Assessment for P-949, Multipurpose Training Range, Marine Corps
Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina.

1

Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Atlantic Division (LANTDIV). 1995.
Environmental Assessment for P-933, Multi-Purpose Range Complex, U.S. Marine
Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina.
Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Atlantic Division (LANTDIV). 1996.
Environmental Assessment, P-028, Infantry Platoon Battle Course, U.S. Marine
Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina.
Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Atlantic Division (LANTDIV). 2002. Final Range
Compatible Use Zone (RCUZ) Study for Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North
Carolina.
Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Southwest Division, (SWDIV). 2001.
Environmental Assessment for Proposed Rifle/Pistol Range at Marine Corps Air
Station Miramar.
Pater, Larry. 1976. Noise Abatement Program for Explosive Operations at NSWC/DL.
[FINAL/ January 2006]
5-2
List of Preparers
7
I
Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
TenBrink, Craig. Wildlife Biologist, Environmental Management Division, MCB Camp
Lejeune. August 17, 2005. Personal communication by telephone and email with
Lisa Padgett, NAVFAC Atlantic.
TRC Garrow Associates, Inc. 2003. Archeology Survey of the New Mechanized Assault
Course, FY98 Silvicultural Prescription, and P-062 Roads, Marine Corps Base,
Camp Lejeune, Onslow County, North Carolina.
U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventative Medicine (CHPPM). 2001.
Environmental Noise Management.
U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventative Medicine (CHPPM). 2003a.
Environmental Noise Consultation No. 52-EN-OOWZ-03, Environmental Noise
Contours for Proposed P034 Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range, U.S. Marine
Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. Dated: 25 March 2003.
U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventative Medicine (CHPPM). 2003b.
Addendum to Environmental Noise Consultation No. 52-EN-00WZ--03,
Environmental Noise Contours for Proposed P034 Multi-Purpose Machine Gun
Range, U.S. Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. Dated: 27 August
2003.
U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventative Medicine (CHPPM). 2003a.
Addendum 2 to Environmental Noise Consultation No. 52-EN-OOWZ-03,
Environmental Noise Contours for Proposed P034 Multi-Purpose Machine Gun
Range, U.S. Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. Dated: 30
December 2003.
U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventative Medicine (CHPPM). 2005.
Operational Noise Consultation No. 52-ON-03F9-05, Large Caliber Weapons Noise
Contours for Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. Dated: 3 June
2005.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Census Bureau (U.S. Census Bureau). 2003. Fagfiinder
Tables [http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/BasieFactsServlet].
U.S. Marine Corps. 2003. Marine Corps Order April 2003 P3570.IB, Policies and
Procedures for Firing Ammunition for Training, Target Practice, and Combat.
U.S. Marine Corps. 1992. Marine Corps Order P5090.2, Environmental Compliance
Protection Manual.

[FINAL/ January 2006]
5-3
List of Preparers

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
6 LIST OF PREPARERS
This Environmental Assessment was prepared by:
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Atlantic
' 6506 Hampton Blvd.
Norfolk, VA 23508
' Key personnel included:
KEITH JENKINS, ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNER: Environmental Planning Branch,
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Atlantic.
ERIN SWIADER, BIOLOGIST: Environmental Planning Branch, Naval Facilities
Engineering Command Atlantic.
LISA PADGETT, ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER: North Carolina/Caribbean
Integrated Product Team, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Atlantic.
' MARINE CORPS CONTRIBUTORS
TOM BARBEE, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SPECIALIST: Head of NEPA
' Section, Environmental Conservation Branch, Environmental Management Division,
Installations and Environment Department, Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North
Carolina.
FRED ESTES, FACILITIES PLANNER: Planning Branch, Installation Development
Division, Installations and Environment Department, Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune,
' North Carolina.
TWYLAH HARDISON, ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN:
' NEPA Section, Environmental Conservation Branch, Environmental Management Division,
Installations and Environment Department, Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North
Carolina.
DISEL HINKLE, PLANNER: Range Development Division, Training and Operations
Department, Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina.
MARTIN KORENEK, WILDLIFE BIOLOGIST: Land and Wildlife Resources Section,
Environmental Conservation Branch, Environmental Management Division, Installations
and Environment Department, Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina.
r
[FINAL/ January 2006] 6-1 List of Preparers

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range P-034 MCB Camp Lejeune
DANNY MARSHBURN, FOREST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM MANAGER:
Forestry Section, Environmental Conservation Branch, Environmental Management '
Division, Installations and Environment Department, Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune,
North Carolina.
RICK RICHARDSON, BASE ARCHAEOLOGIST: Cultural Resources Section,
Environmental Conservation Branch, Environmental Management Division, Installations
and Environment Department, Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. ,
EMILY SYLVESTER, ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER: Air Quality and Noise
Section, Environmental Quality Branch, Environmental Management Division, Installations '
and Environment Department, Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina.
CRAIG TENBRINK, WILDLIFE BIOLOGIST: Threatened and Endangered Species
Section, Environmental Conservation Branch, Environmental Management Division,
Installations and Environment Department, Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North
Carolina. '
JIMMY WALDROP, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SPECIALIST, NEPA
Section, Environmental Conservation Branch, Environmental Management Division, '
Installations and Environment Department, Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North
Carolina.
[FINAL/ January 2006] 6-2 List of Preparers
I?

0

Appendix A
Determination of No Effect Letter
from North Carolina SHPO
dated 9 August 2005

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
PewR Smdbed; Administrator
Michael F. Easley, Governor Office ofA chivra and History
Lisbeth C. Evans, Seaetaq Division of kiiistorical Resources
Jeffrey). Crow, Deputy Secrep David Brook Director
August 9, 2005
Scott A. Brewer, PE, Director
F-Avironmental Management
United States Marine Coles
Marine Corps Base
PSC Box 20004
Camp Lejeune, NC 28542-0004
Re: Request for Coamtrence on a Determinapon of 'No Effect" on E Wble Cultural Resources in the
Greater Sandy Run Area; Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, Onslow County, ER 99-8077
Dear Mr. Brewer.
Thank you for your letw of September 28,1999. We have reviewed the letter and Technical Memorandum
of the project above by TIC Gasrow Associates, Inc. and offer the following comments.
Based on the results of intensive survey and precious discussions by your office with NCSHPO staff we
concur that the P-062A pmjeet will. have no effect on eligible cultural resources in the Greater Sandy Run
Area (GSRA). We also wncur that the P-06ZA survey completes the Base's inventory of archaeological
resources in the GSRA area and no further inventory within the GSRA area is deemed necessary.
The above comments atemade pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Hisrodc Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comments, >
please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-733.4763. In all future
communication concerning this project, please dte the above-referenced tracking number.

L

?I

Sincerely,
",w,Aaa,a,
Sandbeck
c: Rick R. Richardson, Camp Lejeune
ADMINISTRATION OR Blount Street. Raleigh NC 4617 hQ Service Genres Raleigh NC 276994617
RESTORATION SISRHIount Street, Raleigh NC 4617 bW Service Centa, Ralco NC 276994617
IIRVEY Be PLANNING $15 N. Blount Street Raleigh, NC 4617 W Service Centet. Raleigh NC 27699-4617

P

1
Appendix B
Federal and State Listed Species

State and Federally Listed Species in Onslow County, North Carolina (140 listed as of January 2004)

Major Grou
Scientific Name
Common Name State
Status Federal
Status State
Rank Global
Rank

Mamma(
Neotome floridana floddans
Population
T Count - Status

Mammal
Puma concolorcouguar
Eastern Cougar
E -
E S1 G5T5 Onslow- Current

Mammal
Sciurus nlger
Eastern Fox Squirrel
SR SH G5TH Onslow- Historic

Mammal
Tiichechus manatus
West Indian Manatee
E -
E S3 G5 Onslow - Current
S1N G2 Onslow - Current
Bird Aimophile aestivalis Bachman's Sparrow SC FSC S3B,S2N G3 Onslow - Current
Bird Ammodramushenslown Henslows Sparrow SR FSC S2B,S1N G4 Onsiow - Current
Bird Charaddus malodus Piping Plover T T S2B,S2N G3 Onslow - Current
Bird Charaddus wilsonia Wilson's Plover SR - S3B,SZN G5 Onslow - Current
Bird Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald Eagle T T (PD) S36,83N G4 Onslow- Current
Bird Himantopus mexicanus Black-necked Stilt SR - S2B G5 Onslow- Current
Bird Laterallusjamaicensis Black Rail SR FSC S3B,S2N G4 Onslow- Current
Bird Passerina ciris cids Eastern Painted Bunting SR FSC S38,SZN G5T3T4 Onslow - Current
Bird Picoldes borealis Red-cockaded Woodpecker E E 52 G3 Onslow - Current
Bird Porphyrula martinica Purple Gallinule SR - SHB G5 Onslow - Historic
Bird Rynchops niger Black Skimmer SC - S3B,S3N G5 Onslow - Current
Bird Stems antiliarum Least Tern SC - S3B,SZN G4 Onslow - Current
Bird Stems hirundo Common Tam SC - S3B,SZN G5 Onslow- Current
Bird Stems Notice Gull-billed Tam T - S3B,SZN G5 Onslow - Historic
Reptile Alligator mississlppiensis American Alligator T T(SIA) S3 G5 Onslow- Current
Reptile Caretta caretta Loggerhead T T S3B,S3N G3 Onslow - Current
Reptile Chelonia mydas Green Turtle T T S1B,SZN G3 Onslow - Current
Reptile Crotalus adamenteus Eastern Diamondback Rattlesnake E - S1 G4

Reptile
Crotalus honidus
Timber Rattlesnake
SC
-
S3 Onslow- Current

Reptile
Deirochelys reticulana
Chicken Turtle
SR
-
S3 G4 Onsfow - Obscure

Reptile
Dermochelys coriecea
Leatherback
E
E
S G5 Onslow - Obscure

Reptile
Haterodon simus
Southern Hognose Snake
Sc
FSC AB,SZN
S2 G2 Onslow- Current

Reptile
Malaclemys terrapin centrata
Carolina Diamondback Terrapin
SC
S3 G2 Onslow - Current

Reptile
Masticophis flagellum
Coachwhip
SR G4T4 Onslow- Current

Reptile
Micrurus fulwus
Eastern Coral Snake

E - S3 G5
Onsl -Obscure

Reptile
Ophisaurus mimicus
Mimic Glass Lizard
SC -
FSC 81
S2 G5 Onsiow- Current
G3 Onslow- Current
Appendix B, Page 1 of 11
r === M M M r=== r r === r
= = » r 1=1 r M r = = = w = = M Mill =
State and Federally Listed Species in Onslow County, North Carolina (140 listed as of January 2004)

Major Grou
p Scientific Name
Common Name State
Status Federal
Status State
Rank Global
Rank

Reptile
Regina ngida
Glossy Crayfish Snake
SR
S2S3
G5 County Status

Reptile
Seminatrix pygaea
Black Swamp Snake
SR
-
S2 Onslow - Obscure

Reptile
Sistrurus miliarius
Pigmy Rattlesnake
SC
-
S3 G5 Onslow - Obscure
G5 Onslow - Current
Amphibian HA andersonn Pine Barrens Treefrog SR S3 G4 Onslow - Obscure
Amphibian Rana capito Carolina Gopher Frog T FSC $2 G3 Onslow - Current
Fish Acipenser brevirostrum Shortnose Sturgeon E E S1 G3 Onslow - Historic
Fish Fundulus confluentus Marsh Killifish SR - S2 G5 Onslow - Obscure
Fish Fundulus luciae Spotfin Killifish SR - S2 G4 Onslow- Obscure
Fish Hypsoblennius ionthas Freckled Blenny SR - S2 GS Onslow- Obscure
Fish Poecilia latipinna Sailfin Molly SR - S2? G5 Onslow - Current
Mollusk Sphaerium simile Grooved Fingernailclam SR - Si? G5 Onslow - Current
Crustacean Procamberus plumimanus Croatan Crayfish SR FSC S3 G4 Onslow- Historic
Insect Agrotis sp 1 nrbuchholzi a dart moth SR FSC S2S3 G2G3 Onslow - Obscure
Insect Amblyschtes alternate Dusky Roadside-skipper SR - S2 G3G4 Onslow - Current
Insect Amblyscirtes reverse Reversed Roadside-skipper SR - S3 G3G4 Onslow - Current
Insect Atrytonopsis sp 1 an undescribed skipper SR FSC Si? G1? Onslow - Current
Insect Calephelis virginlensis Little Metalmark SR - S2 G4 Onslow - Current
Insect Chlorochroa dismalia Dismal Swamp Green Stink Bug SR - S1? GU Onslow - Historic
Insect Doryodes sp 1 a new owlet moth SR - S3? G3G4 Onslow - Obscure
Insect Dysgonia similis an owlet moth SR - S2S3 G3G4 Onslow - Obscure
Insect Exyra samicrocea a pitcher plant moth SR - S2S3 G3G4 Onslow- Obscure
Insect Gabara sp 1 an owlet moth SR - SU GU Onslow- Obscure
Insect Hesperia meskei Meske's Skipper SR - S3 G2G4 Onslow - Obscure
Insect Macrochilo louisiane Louisiana Owlet Moth SR - S2S3 G4 Onslow - Obscure
Insect Metarranthislaferitiarla an inchworm moth SR - S1S3 G2G4 Onslow- Obscure
Insect Nematocamps baggetaria Baggett's Nematocampa SR - SU G2G4 Onslow - Obscure
Insect Papilio cresphontes Giant Swallowtail SR - S2 G5
Onslow - Current
Appendix B, Page 2 of 11
State and Federally Listed Species in Onslow County, North Carolina (140 listed as of January 2004)

Ma-or Grou
p Scientific Name
Common Name State
Status Federal
Status State
Rank Global
Rank

Insect
Ptichodis bistrigata
Southern Ptichodis
SR Count -Status

Insect
Pygarcfia abdominalis
Yellow-edged Pygarctia
SR - S2S3 G3 Onslow - Obscure

Insect
Satyrium kingi
King's Hairstreak
SR - S2S3 G3G4 Onslow- Obscure

Insect
Schizura sp 1
a new prominent moth
SR - S2S3 G3G4 Onslow- Obscure

Insect
Tirchosilia manffesta
an owiet moth
SR - S1S3 G3G4 Onslow - Obscure
- .S2S3 G4 Onslow - Obscure
Lichen Teloschistes f`lavicans Sunrise Lichen SR-P - S1 G3G4 Onslow - Current
Moss Sphagnum fffzgeraldii Fitzgerald's Peatmoss SR-T - 82S3 G2G3 Onslow - Current
Vascular Plant Agalinis aphYfla Scale-leaf Gerardia SR -P - S3 G3G4 Onslow - Current
Vascular Plant Agalinis virgata Branched Gerardia SR-P - S2 G3G4Q Onslow - Current
Vascular Plant Allium sp 1 Savanna Onion SR-L FSC S1 G1

Vascular Plant
Amaranthus pumdus
Seabeach Amaranth
T
T Onslow- Current

Vascular Plant
Andropogon mohiii
Bog Bluestem
SR
P S2 G2 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Amoglossum ovatum
Savanna Indian-plantain -
SR-P - S1 G4? Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Asdepias pedicellata
Savanna Milkweed
SR-P - S2 G4G5 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Asplenfum heteroresiliens
Carolina Spleenwort
E -
FSC S2
S1 G4 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Ca/opogon multflforus
Many-flower Grass-pink
E
FSC
S1 G2Q Onslow - Historic

Vascular Plant
Caraxlute&
Golden Sedge
E
E G2G3 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Carex verrucosa
Warty Sedge
SR -P S1 G1 Onsiow- Current

Vascular Plant
Cirslum lecontei
Leconte's Thistle
SR-P - S1 G3G4 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Cladium mariscoides
Twig-rush
SR-0 - S2 G4G5 Onslow- Current

Vascular Plant
Comus asperifolia
Roughleaf Dogwood
SR-P - S2 G5 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Cyperus lecontei
Leconte's Flatsedge
SR -P - S1 G4 Onslow- Current

Vascular Plant
Cyperus tetragonus
Four-angled Flatsedge
SR -P -
- S1
S1 G4? Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant

Cystopteris fennesseensis

Tennessee Bladder-fern

E-SC G4?
Onslow - Historic

Vascular Plant
Dichanthellum fusffomme
Spindle-fruited Witch Grass
SR-P - S1 G5 Onslow -Historic

Vascular Plant
Dichanthellum hirstfi
Hirsts' Panic Grass

E - $1 G4G5T5?
Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Dionaea muscipula
Venus Flytrap
SR-L
SC C
FSC S1
S3 G1 Onslow -Current

Vascular Plant
Eleocharis cellulose
Gulfcoast Spikerush ,
SR-P G3 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Elsocharis elongate
Florida Spikerush
SR-P - S1 G4G5 Onslow- Historic
- S1 G5?
Onslow -Current
Appendix B, Page 3 of 11
r r = = = Ml M M = = = r = = = = IM
I? i? ? 1! ? ? ? I? ? I? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
State and Federally Listed Species in Onslow County, North Carolina (140 listed as of January 2004)

_Majoor Grou
p Scientific Name
Common Name State
Status Federal
Status State
Rank Global
Rank

Vascular Plant
Eleochans montevidensis
Sand Spikerush
SR -P County Status

Vascular Plant
Eleocharis robbinsii
Robbins's Spikerush
SR-P -
- 81
S2 G5 Onslow - Cun ent

Vascular Plant
lsoetesmicrovela
Ouillwort
SR
L G4G5 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Lachnocaulon minus
Brown Bogbutton -
SR-P -
- S1
S2 G1 Onslow- Current

Vascular Plant
Litsea aestivalis
Pondspice
SR-T
FSC
S2 G3G4 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Lobelia boykin#
Boykin's Lobelia
T
FSC
S1 G3 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Lophiole eurea
Golden Crest
E G2G3 Onslow- Current

Vascular Plant
Ludwigia alata
Winged Seedbox
SR-P -
- S1
S2 G4 Onslow- Current

Vascular Plant
Ludwigia linifolia
Flaxleaf Seedbox
SR-P
-
82 G4 Onslow- Historic

Vascular Plant
Ludwigia sutfruticosa
Shrubby Seedbox
SR-P
-
S2 G4
G5 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Lysimachis asperulifolie
Rough-leaf Loosestrife
E
E
S3 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Muhlenbergia torreyana
Pinebarren Smokegrass
E
-
S1 G3 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Myricphyllum lexum
Loose Watermilfoil
T
FSC
S1 G3 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Packers paupercula
Balsam Ragwort
SR-P
-
Si? G3
G5 Onslow- Current

Vascular Plant
Panicum tenerum
Southeastern Panic Grass
SR -P
-
S3 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Parietaria preetermissa
Large-seed Pellitory
SR-P G4 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Pamassia caroliniana
Carolina Grass-of-parnassus
E - S1 G3G4 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Peltandra sagittifolla
Spoonflower
SR-P -
- S2
S2S3 G3 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Plantago spersitlora
Pineland Plantain
E
FSC
S1 G3G4 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Platenthere Integra
Yellow Fringeless Orchid
T
S1 G3 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Polygala hookeri
Hooker's Milkwort
SR-T
-
S2 G3G4 Onslow - Historic

Vascular Plant
Polygonum hirsutum
Hairy Smartweed
SR-P
-
S1 G3 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Ponthieva racemosa
Shadow-witch
SR-P G4G5 Onslow- Historic

Vascular Plant
Rhexia aristoss
Awned Meadow-beauty
T -
FSC S2
S3 G4G5 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Rhexia cubensis
West Indies Meadow-beauty
SR-P
-
S1 G3 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Rhynchospora breWseta
Short-bristled Beaksedge
SR-P G4G5 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Rhynchospora decurrens
Swamp Forest Beaksedge
SR-P -
FSC S2
S1 G3G4 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Rhynchospora
divergens
White-seeded Beaksedge
SR-P G3G4 Onsiow- Current

Vascular Plant _
pinetorum
Small's Beaksedge
SR-T - S1 G4 Onslow -Current

Vascular Plant
Rhynchospora harperi
Harper's Beaksedge
P
SR - S1 G5?T3? Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Rhynchospore oligantha
Feather-bristle Beaksedge -
SR -P - S1 G4? Onslow - Current
Vascular Plant Rhynchospors pleientha Coastal Beaksedge SR-T S2 G4 Onslow - Current
- l
S1 G2 Onslow -Current
Appendix B, Page 4 of 11
State and Federally Listed Species in Onslow County, North Carolina (140 listed as of January 2004)

Major Grou
p Scientific Name
Common Name State
Status Federal
Status State
Rank Global
Rank

Vascular Plant
Rhynchospora scirpoides
Long-beak Baldsedge
SR-0
S2 Coun - Status

Vascular Plant
Rhynchospore fhomei
Thorne's Beaksedge
E
FSC
81 G4 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Rhynchospora tracyi
Tracy's Beaksedge
SR -P
-
S2 G1G2 Onslow- Current

Vascular Plant
Sageretie minutiAora
Small-flowered Buckthorn
SR-P
-
S1 G4 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Sagitfaria graminea var ohapmenfi
Chapman's Arrowhead
SR-P G4 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
weatherbiana
Grassleaf Arrowhead
SR-T -
- S1
S2 G5T3? Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Schoenoplectus etuberculatus
Canby's Bulrush
SR-P
-
S3 G5T2 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Scirpus lineatus
Drooping Bulrush
SR -P
-
S2 G3G4 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Schpus pendulus
Rufous Bulrush
SR-0
-
S1 G4 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Scleria georgiana
Georgia Nutrush
SR-P
-
S2 G5 Onslow- Current

Vascular Plant
Scleris reficuleris
Netted Nutrush
SR-0 G4 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Scleria verticr7lata
Savanna Nutrush
SR-P - S2 G4 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
SoUdago pulchra
Carolina Goldenrod
E - S1 G5 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Solidego Verna
Spring-flowering Goldenrod
SR-L -
FSC S3
S3 G3 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Solidego villosicarps
Coastal Goldenrod
E G3 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Spiranthes laciniate
Lace-lip Ladies'-tresses
SR -P - S1 G1 Onslaw- Current

Vascular Plant
Spirenthes longilabris
Giant Spiral Orchid
SR-T -
- S1
S1 G4G5 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Thalicfrum coofeyi
Cooley's Meadowrue
E
E G3 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Trifolium carolinianum
Carolina Clover
SR-O
- S1
SH G1 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Utricularia olivacea
Dwarf Bladderwurt
T
-
S2 G5 Onslow - Historic

Vascular Plant
Xyris brevifolia
Shortleaf Yellow-eyed-grass
SR-P
-
S2 G4 Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Xyris Mormis varfloridene
Florida Yellow eyed-grass
SR-P
-
S1 G4G5
G Onslow - Current

Vascular Plant
Yucca glodose
Moundlily Yucca
SR-P 5T4T5 Onslow- Current
- S2? G4? Onslow - Current
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NC NHP) database updated: January, 2004
Search performed on Thursday, 29 September 2005 @ 12:09:01 EDST
http://www.ncnhp.org/Pagesiguide.htm
http://www.ncsparks.nettnhpfsearch.html
http://207.4.179.50/nhp/county. html
Appendix B, Page 5 of 11
w Ir it i? r?¦ ire . r ? i? +? ? ii?u i. i? ? iii. r
M M M M M M M M M M M ' M M M M M M M
EXPLANATION OF CODES FOR COUNTY AND QUAD STATUS LISTS
The county and quadrangle status lists provided by the NC Natural Heritage Program tally the elements of natural diversity (rare
plants and animals, rare and exemplary natural communities, and special animal habitats) known to occur in all North Carolina
counties and USGS 7.5-minute quadrangles. The information on which these lists is based comes from a variety of sources,
including field surveys, museums, herbaria, scientific literature, and personal communications. These lists are dynamic, with new
records continually being added and old records being revised as new information is received. As a result, a list cannot be
considered a definitive record of the elements of natural diversity present in a given county or quad and should not be used as a
substitute for field surveys. When this information is used in any document, we request that the date this list was compiled be given
and that the NC Natural Heritage Program be credited.
.I CODE STATUS CODE STATUS
! E-? Endangered SR Significantly Rare
T Threatened EX Extirpated
SC Special Concern ?- Proposed (used only as a qualifier of the ranks above)
C Candidate
NOTE: the definitions of state statuses of plants and animals differ. Below are summaries of the statuses for each group.
Plant status is determined by the Plant Conservation Program (NC Department of Agriculture) and the Natural Heritage Program
(NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources). Endangered, Threatened, and Special Concern species are protected by
state law (Plant Protection and Conservation Act, 1979). Candidate and Significantly Rare designations indicate rarity and the need
for population monitoring and conservation action. Note that plants can have a double status, e.g., E-SC, indicates that while the
plant is endangered, it is collected or sold under regulation.
CODE I STATUS DEFINITION
"Any species or higher taxon of plant whose continued existence as a viable component of the
E Endangered State's flora is determined to be in jeopardy" (GS 19B 106: 202.12). (Endangered species may
not be removed from the wild except when a permit is obtained for research, propagation, or
rescue that will enhance the survival of the species.)
Appendix B, page 6 of 11
.FT
Threatened
SC 1 Special Concern
-L _I Limited
muy resmeni species of punt which is likely to become an endangered species within the
foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range" (GS 19B 106:202.12).
(Regulations are the same as for Endangered species.)
"Any species of plant in North Carolina which requires monitoring but which may be collected
and sold under regulations adopted under the provisions of [the Plant Protection and
Conservation Act]" (GS 19B 106:202.12). (Special Concern species that are not also listed as
Endangered or Threatened may be collected from the wild and sold under specific regulations.
Propagated material only of Special Concern species which are also listed as Endangered or
Threatened may be traded or sold under specific regulations.)
Species that are very rare in North Carolina, generally with 1-20 populations in the state,
generally substantially reduced in numbers by habitat destruction (and sometimes also by direct
exploitation or disease). These species are also either rare throughout their ranges (fewer than
100 populations total) or disjunct in North Carolina from a main range in a different part of the
country or world. Also included are species that may have 20-50 populations in North Carolina,
but fewer than 50 populations range wide. These are species which have the preponderance of
their distribution in North Carolina and whose fate depends largely on their conservation here.
Also included are many species known to have once occurred in North Carolina but with no
known extant occurrences in the state (historical or extirpated species); if these species are
.,irelocated in the state, they are likely to be listed as Endangered or Threatened. If present land
use trends continue, candidate species are likely to merit listing as Endangered or Threatened.
Species that are very rare in North Carolina, generally with 1-20 populations in the state,
(generally substantially reduced in numbers by habitat destruction (and sometimes also by direct
exploitation or disease). These species are generally more common somewhere else in their
ranges, occurring in North Carolina peripherally to their main ranges, mostly in habitats which
are unusual in North Carolina. Also included are some species with 20-100 populations in North
Carolina, if they also have only 50-100 populations range wide and are declining.
The range of the species is limited to North Carolina and adjacent states (endemic or near
endemic). These are species that may have 20-50 populations in North Carolina, but fewer than
50 populations range wide. The preponderance of their distribution is in North Carolina and their
fate depends largely on conservation here. Also included are some species with 20-100
populations in North Carolina, if they also have only 50-100 populations range wide and
declining.
Appendix B, page 7 of 11
M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
M M M M M M M M M M M M M r r M M M M
-T Throughout These species are rare throughout their ranges (fewer than 100 populations total)
-D Disjunct The species is disjunct to NC from a main range in a different part of the country or world.
rT
specie
s is at the periphery of its range in NC. These species are generally more common
Peripheral ewhere else in their ranges, occurring in North Carolina peripherally to their main ranges,
F tly in habitats which are unusual in North Carolina.
O Other JThe range of the species is sporadic or cannot be described by the other Significantly Rare
categories
__ F -
P Proposed JA species that has been formally proposed for listing as Endangered, Threatened, or Special
^ Concern, but has not, yet completed the legally mandated l'
stng process
The Wildlife Resources Commission and the Natural Heritage Program determine animal status. Endangered, Threatened, and
Special Concern species of mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, freshwater fishes, and freshwater and terrestrial mollusks have
legal protection status in North Carolina (Wildlife Resources- Commission). The Significantly Rare designation indicates rarity and the
need for population monitoring and conservation action.
CODE STATUS DEFINITION
"Any native or once-native species of wild animal whose continued existence as a viable
E Endangered component of the State's fauna is determined by the Wildlife Resources Commission to be in
jeopardy or any species of wild animal determined to be an 'endangered species' pursuant to the
'Endangered Species Act." (Article 25 of Chapter 113 of the General Statutes; 1987).
Any native or once-native species of wild animal which is likely to become an endangered
T Threatened species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range,-or one
that is designated as a threatened species pursuant to the Endangered Species Act." (Article 25
of Chapter 113 of the General Statutes; 1987).
"Any species of wild animal native or once-native to North Carolina which is determined by the
SC Special Concern Wildlife Resources Commission to require monitoring but which may be taken under regulations
adopted under the provisions of this Article." (Article 25 of Chapter 113 of the General Statutes;
1987).
Any species which has not been listed by the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission as an
SR Significantly Rare . Endangered, Threatened, or Special Concern species, but which exists in the state in small
numbers and has been determined by the N.C. Natural Heritage Program to need monitoring.
Appendix 8, page 8 of 11
EX
a vck?. imaiurai rientage Program designation.) Significantly Rare species include
?heral" species, whereby North Carolina lies at the periphery of the species' range (such as
it Thrush). The designation also includes marine and estuarine fishes identified as
arable" by the N.C. State Museum of Biological Sciences (Ross et al., 1988, Endanaered
tened, and Rare Fauna of North Camlinn D7rf 11 A n__.._.._.._ L_
?.
txtirpated
I'_ .1 Proposed
-
? STATUS DEFINITION
FE F- Endangered A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a si
T Threatened A taxon "likely to become an endangered species wi
significant portion of its range."

Endangered, ------------
The Endangered Species Act permits the reintroduce
EXN nonessential experimental" populations. Such populations, consid
experimental
population. species,-are managed with fewer restrictions than pc
The Endangered Species Act authorizes the treatme

T(S/A) Threatened due to
Similarity of
Appearance, segment) as threatened even though it is not otherwi
closely resembles in appearance a threatened specie
substantial difficulty in differenti
ti
b
a
ng
etween the list
substantial difficulty is an additional threat to a threat
species, which is no longer believed to occur in the state.
?ecies has been proposed by a Scientific Council as a status (Endangered, Threatened,
racial Concern, Watch List, or for De-listing) that is different from the current status, but the
atus has not yet been adopted by the Wildlife Resources Commission and by the General
;sembly as law. In the lists of rare species in this book, these proposed statuses are listed in
rentheses below the current status. Only those proposed statuses that are different from the
rrent statuses are listed.
The US Fish and Wildlife Service designate FEDERAL STATUS. Federally listed Endangered and Threatened species are
protected under the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 99730 as amended through the 100th Congress. Unless otherwise
noted, definitions are taken from the Federal Register, VoI.56, No. 225, November 29, 1991 (50 CFR Part 17).
CODE
gnificant portion of its range."
thin the foreseeable future throughout all or a
ion of endangered animals as "nonessential
ered nonessential to the survival of the
1pulations listed as endangered.
nt of a species (subspecies or population
se listed as threatened if: (a) The species so
as that enforcement personnel would have
ed and unlisted species; (b) the effect of this
ened species; and (c) such treatment of nn
Appendix B, page 9 of 11
¦¦r. M M M M M M M M» M M M M M= ¦r¦ = r
M M MM M M M M M r M. M M M M M M M M
I unlisted species will substantially, facilitate the enforcement and further the policy of the Act. The
American Alligator has this designation due to similarity of appearance to other rare crocodilians.
The Bog Turtle (southern population) has this designation due to similarity of appearance to Bog
Turtles in the threatened northern population.
F C 1. Candidate ' rccattaeego xon under consideration for which there is sufficient information to support listing. This
I ry w as formerly designated as a Candidate 1 (C1) species.
FSC Federal "Species of (Also called "Species at Risk"). Formerly defined as a taxon under consideration for which there is
Concern" insufficient information to support listing;
formerly designated as a Candidate 2 (C2) species.
F PE Proposed Species has been proposed for listing as endangered.
Endangered
PD Proposed De-listed J Species has been proposed for de-listing.
GLOBAL AND STATE RANKS. These ranks are determined by The Nature Conservancy's system of measuring rarity and threat
status. "Global" refers to worldwide ranks and "State" to statewide ranks.
STATE
RANK ]DEFINITIONS
S1 ]Critically imperiled in North Carolina because of extreme rarity or otherwise very vulnerable to extirpation in the state.
S2 lmperiled in North Carolina because of rarity or otherwise vulnerable to extirpation in the state.
S3 Rare or uncommon in North Carolina.
S4 pparently secure in North Carolina, with many occurrences.
S5 Demonstrably secure in North Carolina and essentially ineradicable under present conditions.
SA Accidental or casual; one to several records for North Carolina, but the state is outside the normal range of the species.
SH Of historical occurrence in North Carolina, perhaps not having been verified in the past 25 years, and suspected to be
stiff extant in the state.
SR Reported from North Carolina, but without persuasive documentation for either accepting or rejecting the report.
SX Believed to be extirpated from North Carolina.
SU ? Possibly in peril in North Carolina, but status uncertain; more information is needed.
Appendix B, page 10 of 11
S? Unranked, or rank uncertain.
S-13 Rank of breeding population in the state. Used for migratory species only.
S N Rank of non-breeding population in the state. Used-for migratory species only.
SZ_ Population is not of significant conservation concern; applies to transitory, migratory species.
GLOBAL: LBALBA
RANK DEFINITIONS
I G1 lCritically imperiled globally because of extreme rarity or otherwise very vulnerable to extinction throughout its range.
F 62 Imperiled globally because of rarity or otherwise vulnerable to extinction throughout its range.
G3 ]Either. very rare and local throughout its range, or found locally in a restricted area.
F G4 Apparently secure'globally, although it may be quite rare in parts of its range (especially at the periphery).
G5 Demonstrably secure globally, although it may be quite rare in parts of its range (especially at the periphery).
F GH Of historical occurrence throughout its range.
GX Believed to be extinct throughout its range.
GU Possibly in peril, but status uncertain; more information is needed.
G? Unranked, or rank uncertain.
G_Q Of questionable taxonomic status.
G T Status of subspecies or variety; the G-rank refers to the species as a whole, the T-rank to the subspecies.
ADDITIONAL DEFINITIONS
Elements within a county or quad are subdivided into "Current", "Historic", "Obscure" or "Potential" records.
Current record: the element was last observed in the county or quad at most 20 years ago.
Historic record: the element was last observed in the county or quad more than 20 years ago.
Obscure record: the date the element was last observed in the county or quad is uncertain.
Potential record: the element has the potential to be found in the county or quad.
NOTE: Scientific and common names listed in parentheses are synonyms listed,in US Fish and Wildlife Service, 1992, Endangered
and Threatened Species of the Southeastern United States (The Red Book).
Appendix B, page 11 of 11

-'- r) A
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT I OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-0003
(33 CFR 325) Expires December 31, 2004
The Public burden for this collection of information is sestimated to average 10 hours per response, although the majority of applications should require
5 hours or less. This includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of
information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Deforms, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of Information
Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget,
Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC 20503. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law,
no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control
number. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having
jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Riven and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection , Research and
Sanctuaries Act, 33 USC 1413, Section 103. Principal Purpose: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application for a
permit. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies.
Submission of requested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit
be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this
application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed
activity. An application that is not completed. in full will be returned.
1. APPLICATION NO
2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
/TE FLOW TO BE F/L BY APP / AN
5. APPLICANT'S NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE Ian spent is not reauireW
Mr. Scott Brewer Martin Korenek - Permit POC
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS
Marine Corps Base, PSC Box 20004 Marine Corps Base, PSC Box 20004
Camp Lejeune, NC 28542 Camp Lejeune, NC 28542
T. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE 10. AGENT'S PHONE NOS. W AREA CODE
a. Residence NA a. Residence NA
b. Business 910-451-5003 b. Business POC 910-451-7235
11s STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
I hereby authorize, NA to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to
furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application.
,APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE
NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see#omwdons,
Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range, Greater Sandy Run Area (MILCON No. P-034)
13. NAME OF WATERBODY. IF KNOWN nrnn,d;,swr.; 1 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS t;tapp1Awbk)
Shelter Swamp Creek
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Onslow North Carolina
Greater Sandy Run Area Training Complex
(located west of US Hwy. 17)
COUNTY STATE
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN, (seeinstruotions)
MCB Camp Lejeune
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
Take US 17N from Wilmington to Holly Ridge. GSRA is.bounded by US 17 on the east and south,
NC 50 on the west and south, and highways 1104 and 1107 on the north. Map of project areas
is provided.
ENG FORM • Jul 97 EDITION OF FEB 94 IS OBSOLETE. (Proponent: CECW-OR)
18. Nature of Activity (Description os prolee include eu fw"es)
Construction of a Machine Gun Range complex including a control tower, field service head,
operations storage building, general instruction building, ammunition breakdown building,
covered bleacher enclosure and covered meal area. The complex would also include a vehicle
holding area, Battle Site Zero area, a bivouac area, maneuver areas, training areas, target
emplacements, an emergency range shutdown system, telephone distribution system, secondary
Dower distribution svstem. data distribution svstem, and a ranae warnina/sianal flaanole.
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions)
Build a modern Multi-purpose Machine Gun Range Complex with required ancillary facilities
and utilities.
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
Cutting and filling is required to provide site locations for buildings, target locations,
access roads, utilities, and clear, maintained fields of fire for the range.
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharued and the Amount of Each Tvoe in Cubic Yards
Structural fill (clean and free of pollutants) and pavements, (stone/gravel/sand/concrete)
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled iseeinstncrions)
86.03 acres of non-riparian wetlands. See details in attached narrative.
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes Q No ' IF YES. DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (If more than can be entered here,
please attach a supplemental list).
This project is confined to locations within the boundaries of the Greater Sandy Run Area,
Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune.
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL' IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
'Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building and flood plain permits
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this
application is co plate and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the
duly tho d gent of the appf ant.
SIGNAT RE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
NCDWQ 401 Sec 401 Cert
NCDCM Fed Consist.
NCDENR Erosion Ctrl.
NCDENR Stormwater
18 U.S.C, Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
SR-8 Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range (MILCON P-034)
PROJECT NARRATIVE
March 2006
Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune
Greater Sandy Run Area
INTRODUCTION
The US Marine Corps (USMC) proposes to construct and operate a Multi-Purpose Machine Gun
(MPMG) Range SR-8 within the Greater Sandy Run Area (GSRA) of Marine Corps Base (MCB), Camp
Lejeune, North Carolina.
The Marine Corps's mission is to provide the most effective fighting force possible in a rapidly
changing world accented by asymmetrical warfare and the continuing global war on terrorism. In 2005,
Congress approved an additional 3,000 personnel for the Marine Corps in its 2005 Department of Defense
Authorization Act. Subsequently, the USMC decided that 2,100 out of the 3,000 authorized personnel
were going to be stationed at Camp Lejeuene. The Force Structure Review Group then developed
initiatives for the Marine Corps that include creation of additional infantry battalions and an increase in
the number of light-armored vehicle mounted infantry units. These changes have resulted in the approval
of five Military Construction Projects (MILCON) proposed for implementation to accommodate the
training needs of this planned influx of personnel; increased operational tempo and standup of the Marine
Special Operations Command (MARSOC).
MCB Camp Lejeune needs to build and operate the MPMG SR-8 range to provide the necessary
facilities for Marine Corps as well as other military units to maintain their combat readiness. Existing
live-fire machine gun ranges at MCB Camp Lejeune are antiquated and inadequate for today's weapons.
They no longer adequately support all of the modern, medium and heavy machine-gun training
requirements for both the School of Infantry (SOI) where Marines receive entry level training, and the II
Marine Expeditionary Force (II MEF) combat units where annual sustainment and enhancement training
is required. The purpose of this project is to construct the first of 3 planned, modern ranges that provide:
• The most realistic and safe combat training-range for machine gun teams and snipers now using
modern, advanced weapons.
• A range that would support live-fire and maneuvering of both ground and vehicle mounted
machine guns including firing lanes that support vehicle "move and shoot" training.
• Static and moving electronic targets (reactive targets) that would provide realism as well as
performance feedback.
• Thermal image blankets on reactive targets to accommodate thermal sights on modern machine
guns and sniper rifles.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The 121 ha (300 acre) project site is located west of US Hwy 17 and lies in the portion of Marine
Corps Base Camp Lejeune referred to as the Greater Sandy Run Area (GSRA) in Onslow County, NC
(Figures 1 and 2). The Department of Defense purchased the 16,592 ha (41,000 ac) tract of land known
as the GSRA for MCB, Camp Lejeune in 1992. State Road 50 bounds the GSRA on the southwest and
west, and Padgett, Haws Run, Dawson Cabin, and High Hill Roads bound the property to the north,
excluding some out parcels along the northern and western perimeter.
The GSRA is dominated by a series of southern pine forests of various age classes. Prior to
acquisition by the USMC, the GSRA was intensively managed for high volume commercial timber
production for about 45 years.
The GSRA also includes portions of a former World War H Army Training facility at Camp
Davis, located at the southern end near the Town of Holly Ridge.
SOILS
Soil types for the GSRA were determined using the Onslow County Soil Survey (USDA 1992).
Soils at the GSRA are comprised primarily of loamy fine sands and fine sands. Five soil types are
mapped in the project area. Two non-hydric soils occurring on project site include Foreston loamy fine
sand (FoA) and Stallings loamy fine sand (St). Urban lands on site were identified as existing, improved
roads. Three soils listed as hydric soils by the National Technical Committee on Hydric Soils (USDA,
Soil Conservation Service [SCS] 1991) occur on the site. These include: Leon fine sand (Le), Torhunta
fine sandy loam (To), and Woodington loamy fine sand (Wo) (Figure 3). These soils are influenced by
seasonally high water tables and typically have a high organic content and small particle size. Land
around the project site is managed forest land used for military training. A branch of Shelter Swamp
Creek, a tributary of the Cape Fear River Basin lies to the north of the project area.
NATURAL COMMUNITIES
The site is currently undeveloped and forested (Figure 4). It is located on a ridge that separates
the Great Sandy Run Pocosin into a northern pocosin and a southern pocosin. Natural communities of the
area were identified and classified into two broad categories; upland and wetland communities. The
upland communities found in the project area most closely resemble the Mesic Pine Flatwoods
community described by Schafale and Weakley (1990). Two variants occur: planted pine monocultures
and naturally regenerated, managed, mixed pine forests.
UPLANDS
Planted pine monocultures areas are characterized by a dominant loblolly pine (Pinus taeda)
canopy. Depending on the age of the individual stands and the frequency of occurrence of fire, these
woodlands may have anything from a sparse understory to a dense understory. Common understory
species include sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua), horse sugar (Symplocos tinctoria), blackberries
(Rubus spp.), common greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia), and bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum).
The mixed-pine woodlands community type is dominated by loblolly pine with individuals of
longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) and pond pine (Pinus serotina) scattered throughout. Common associates
in this type are sweetgum, red maple (Acer rubrum), and red bay (Persea borbonia). Shrub and herb
layers are sparse to moderate in density. Maintenance of this community type is aided by prescribed fire.
In those communities where fire is frequent, wire grass (Aristides stricta) dominates the herbaceous layer,
with bracken fern also very common in patches. Where fire is less frequent, various panic grasses
(Panicum spp.), broomsedges (Andropogon spp.), and paspalums (Paspalum spp.) dominate the
herbaceous layer.
2
WETLANDS
Two classes of non-riparian wetlands, palustrine forested and scrub-shrub wetlands, (based upon
the Cowardin classification system, Cowardin et al. 1979), can be found in the SR-8 project area.
Palustrine forests are further broken down into five subclasses, of which two were identified at
SR-8: broad-leaved deciduous forests (PF01) and needle-leaved evergreen forests (PF04). Broad-leaved
deciduous wetlands are generally dominated by tree species such as red maple, black gum (Nyssa
sylvatica), and sweet gum. Mid-story of this subclass is comprised of red bay, sweet bay (Magnolia
virginiana), ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana), and American holly (Ilex opaca). The needle-leaved
evergreen canopy is dominated by pond pine and loblolly pine, with a mid-canopy similar to the broad-
leaved deciduous wetland. These subclasses both share similar shrub layers of highbush blueberry
(Vaccinium corymbosum), titi (Cyrila racemiflora), wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), inkberry (Ilex glabra),
fetterbush (Lyonia lucida) and sweet pepperbush (Clethra alnifolia).
Two of the five subclasses of scrub-shrub wetlands can be found within the SR-8 site: scrub-
shrub broad-leaved evergreen (SS3) and scrub-shrub needle-leaved evergreen (SS4). Broad-leaved
evergreen scrub-shrub wetlands have organic soils and dominant species include titi, fetterbush, inkberry,
and evergreen bayberry (Myrica heterophylla). Needle-leaved evergreen scrub-shrub wetlands are
generally composed of young or stunted pond pine or loblolly pine. Both of these scrub-shrub
communities at the proposed site contain young tree species, as well as a defined shrub stratum and
herbaceous layer. Several fern species populate this herb layer including netted chain fern (Woodwardia
areolata), royal fern (Osmunda regalis), cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamomea), sensitive fern (Onoclea
sensibilis) and bracken fern. The size and species composition of these areas is an estimate based upon a
review of aerial photography and field observations (Figure 5). They include:
• Palustrine forested broad-leaved deciduous (PFO1)
• Palustrine forested needle-leaved evergreen (PF04)
• Palustrine forested needle-leaved evergreen / scrub-shrub broad-leaved evergreen (PF04/SS3)
• Palustrine forested needle-leaved evergreen / scrub-shrub broad-leaved evergreen saturated
(PF04/SS3B)
• Palustrine forested broad-leaved deciduous & needle-leaved evergreen / scrub-shrub broad-leaved
evergreen (PFOI/4/SS3)
• Palustrine forested broad-leaved deciduous / scrub-shrub broad-leaved evergreen (PFO1/SS3)
• Palustrine scrub-shrub (PSS)
• Palustrine scrub-shrub needle leaved evergreen (PSS4)
COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT
A federal Consistency Determination and this application will be forwarded to the North Carolina
Dept of Coastal Management requesting its concurrence.
ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT
The proposed project will not adversely impact essential fish habitat (EFH) or associated fisheries
managed by the South Atlantic or Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Councils or the National Marine
Fisheries Service.
FEDERALLY-LISTED THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES
Rough-leaved loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia) is the only known Federally threatened or
endangered species identified at the GSRA High probability habitat was surveyed for Rough-leaved
loosestrife (RLL) and no occurrences were found within the within the project limits. MCB Camp
3
Lejeune natural resources staff would continue to implement the measures described in the INRMP (MCB
Camp Lejeune 2001) to manage and preserve known populations of RLL. There would be no adverse
effects to the federally endangered RLL as a result of constructing and operating the MPMG Range at
SR-8.
Federally endangered red-cockaded woodpeckers (Picoides borealis) inhabit parts of MCB Camp
Lejeune, but no birds have been observed in the GSRA. Prior to government acquisition, timber harvests
removed mature pine stands necessary to support habitat for RCW nesting and foraging. (EDAW, Inc.
1998). Therefore, the proposed action has no potential to impact the endangered RCWs within MCB
Camp Lejeune.
The Carolina goldenrod (Solidago pulchra) is considered endangered by the state of NC, and
considered to be a species of concern at the Federal level. This plant is found within the power-line
easements around the GSRA, but there is no known occurrence within the project limits.
The American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) potentially may be found in the GSRA,
although this animal is listed as Federally threatened only because of its similarity of appearance to the
American crocodile (Crocodylus acutus), which is in fact threatened. Alligators may be encountered in or
near waterways of the GSRA but none of these areas are within the project limits. Therefore, there would
be no impacts to American alligators.
Construction, operation, and maintenance of the proposed MPMG range would have no adverse
impacts to any Federal or state listed species.
CULTURAL RESOURCES
Archeological investigations of all soils at the GSRA having a moderate or high probability of
containing archeological remains have been completed. As agreed to in a January 2000 meeting between
MCB Camp Lejeune personnel and the North Carolina SHPO, the survey of the Juniper Swamp
concludes the required archeological investigations at the GSRA. Therefore, no further cultural resource
surveys are necessary and no impacts to cultural resources are anticipated.
ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Several evaluation criteria were developed and considered when determining the placement of
this project. They are discussed in detail in the Final EA for Construction and Operation of a Multi-
purpose Machine Gun Range in the Greater Sandy Run Area at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune,
October 2005. They can be summarized as:
• Satisfy modern training mission requirements
• Minimize training conflicts between all GSRA ranges in order to maximize range utilization
• Avoid or minimize impacts to natural resources
• Manage noise impacts to acceptable levels by the surrounding community
The alternatives considered.for this project included the no-action alternative, a location near the
Northwest boundary of GSRA, a location between the existing ranges SR-6 and SR-7, and the current
proposed location (Figure 6).
Alternatives Considered but Dismissed
Two locations, one near the Northwest boundary of GSRA, and the other the location between the
existing SR-6 and SR-7 ranges were considered, but eliminated from further study due to the perception
of potential noise affects on the adjacent community. During preparation of the Environmental
Assessment for this project, it was determined that placing SR-8 in its present, proposed location does not
4
create an off-base noise issue. Safe, simultaneous operation and maintenance of other existing ranges in
the GSRA (Figure 7) was another critical element that influenced site selection for this project (ranges
must be located to ensure bullet trajectories do not effect the operation of other ranges).
No-Action Alternative
The no-action alternative would limit Camp Lejeune's ability to train machine gunners on
modern weapons to current individual training standards resulting in marginal weapons proficiency, with
the unintended consequences of jeopardizing combat readiness.
Preferred Action
The GSRA Acquisition FEIS (LANTDIV 1991) and subsequent documents such as the GSRA
Master Development Plan Update (EDAW, Inc. 1998) examined wetlands in the GSRA and tried to
identify range placements that minimized impacts to wetlands during the acquisition of the GSRA. The
proposed action and preferred location for SR-8 MPMG Range, was selected after a review of the
evaluation criteria, as well as reviewing recommendations for range locations described in the GSRA
Master Development Plan Update and the Final Range Compatible Use Zone (RCUZ) Study for Marine
Corps Base, 2002.
During the preliminary investigations for this project, several sites were investigated for the
placement of the SR-8 MPMG Range to minimize impacts to wetlands. However, large live-fire ranges
inherently require large areas of cleared land. They also require large surface danger zones (those areas
that are impacted or have the potential to receive or lie in the path of fired projectiles) that mandate range
placement, including the utilities and other infrastructure needed to support the range. This ensures the
safety of not only military personnel training on the range, but all personnel training on adjacent ranges,
as well as those transiting through or near the base.
During the early planning and design stages of the range complex, the target locations, buildings,
facilities, and gravel roads within the 121 ha (300 ac) SR-8 site were placed to avoid and minimize
impacts to wetlands in a location south-southeast of the current location. However, the large surface
danger zone, prevented interoperability with other ranges and required designers to move the range to the
northwest.
Training and Range Requirements of SR-8
The SR-8 range must provide the safest environment possible to ensure all support and training
personnel on the range, (inexperienced as well as seasoned Marines) are not put at risk during prolonged
training exercises. The surface of the range must provide conditions for safe movement down-range by
personnel during live fire exercises both during night and day-time training, in variable weather
conditions, and when fatigued. The conditions of the range must also allow Range Safety Officers and
support staff responsible for safe operation of the range, clear, unobstructed views of the range and
targetry at all times, as well as access for emergency response personnel. The range must be maintained
according to prescribed maintenance schedules, to the same or nearly the same conditions throughout the
year to ensure all personnel train to the same standards.
The range must be designed so that the maximum effective range of modern weapon systems may
be realized. Many ranges on the installation simply can no longer support today's advanced weapon
systems. There is no, one single range at Camp Lejeune that can support light, medium, and heavy
machine gun training. Additionally, heavy machine gun training currently competes for training time on
other ranges such as the SR-7 Range, a Light Armor Vehicle (LAV) and Main Battle Tank (MIA1 tank)
range. Therefore, training is segmented to single weapons on individual ranges instead of using the whole
weapon system on one range. This is an inefficient way to conduct entry level and sustainment training
and it does not support dismounted, fire and maneuver from heavy machine guns. The surface of this
5
range must allow machine-gunners a clear, unobstructed view of targets at long distances during day and
night-time live-fire training. Targets must be visible with and without the aid of telescopic sights. Range
access roads must be trafficable by gun crews and tactical vehicles during day and night movements.
These access roads must be wide enough to permit inexperienced personnel some latitude to make
mistakes that will not result in catastrophic vehicle accidents.
Range Maintenance Requirements of SR-8
Maintenance problems experienced with existing ranges in the GSRA are directly related to
inundation of low and poorly drained areas within the range footprint. Vegetation management in periods
of extreme wetness is costly, creates additional wear and tear on maintenance equipment, and creates
delays in scheduled maintenance cycles which can then affect training quality due to time constraints and
unit long-range training schedules. Problems with severe inundation have also effected electronic
components of expensive automated target systems and forced the base to abandon portions of some
ranges. The design of the SR-8 range must promote reasonable and regularly scheduled maintenance that
includes, mowing, road repair, target repair and replacement, utility and target component upgrades, and
cleanup of spent ammunition components for recycling.
The SR-8 MPMG Range would consist of 10 firing lanes with a raised earth-berm firing position,
4 fighting holes, 2 vehicle-firing lanes, 2 defilade-firing positions, several vehicle pads for firing vehicle-
mounted guns, and a 10-meter Battle Sight Zero (BZO) range (see attached design plans). Vehicle firing
would occur from vehicles with mounted machine guns, moving down range 400 meters. Surface Danger
Zones (SDZ) would extend out in a fan-shape to a distance of 6,900 in (22,638 ft). The range would have
32 targets in each lane, out to a distance of 1,200 in (3,937 ft). The range would accommodate
marksmanship training with medium machine guns (M249 5.56 mm, M240G 7.62mm), heavy machine
guns (M2.50 caliber and MK19 40 mm grenade) and sniper rifles (M40A3 and M82A3) during day and
night time training exercises. The range would be operational an average of 244 days per year and
roughly one-third of the operations would take place at night. Night operations would involve the use of
pyrotechnics. Helicopters would be authorized to conduct door gunnery exercises from altitudes below
152 in (500 ft) above ground level with training-practice ammunition and other inert (non-dud producing)
ammunition.
6
Wetland Impacts
Building and operating the SR-8 Range will cause unavoidable impacts to wetlands due to
mechanized land clearing, cutting, and filling required for the construction of roads, facilities, target
emplacements, buildings, and other infrastructure (Figure 6).
Construction of the MPMG Range would require impacting (clearing, cutting, and filling) 86.03
acres of non-riparian wetlands (Table 1). Previous impact estimates of 73.28 acres noted in the Final EA
for this project were recalculated. The current proposed area of impact totaling 86.03 acres includes
wetland areas located inside the project limits that were just outside of the jurisdictional delineation
boundary. The areas of compacted fill serving as the foundations for targets, roads, buildings and firing
positions totals 9.64 acres (Table 2). 76.39 acres will remain as vegetated areas to be mowed and
maintained within the range footprint. See designs attached.
' ?127400 61293 4649 1371334 2164542 164178 31.48
' 100101 46320 1830 1077487 1635775 64626 24.74
' 580 92 0 6243 3249 0 0.14
' ?54121 18995 988 582558 670802 34891 13.37
' 65930 20239 322 709671 714734 11371 16.29
• 86.03
Table 1. Summary of proposed wetland impacts/general fill at SR-8. Information provided by U.S. Armv
Engineering and Support Center, Huntsville, Alabama.
• -
all a IM M61.16091
' ?20305
-• A-
12086
.- ... .
218566
..-
426813

15808

5.02
' 8703 1715 93681 60565 2243 2.15
' 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
' ?3178 990 34206 34962 1295 0.79
' 6831 1189 73531 41989 1555 1.69
• 9.64
Table 2. Summarv of nronosed compacted fill areas at SR-8. Information provide d by U.S. Armv Engineerine and
Support Center, Huntsville, Alabama.
7
Mitigation
The Greater Sandy Run Wetland Mitigation Bank in the GSRA on Camp Lejeune was developed
specifically for range development and infrastructure projects in the GSRA (Figure 8). Compensatory
mitigation for this proposed project will be provided with credits from the GSRA Wetland Mitigation
Bank. A summary of the credits available in the GSRA Wetland Mitigation Bank is provided in Table 3.
Credit Type Total Mitigation Approved Approved Approved Mitigation Unused
Credits Mitigation Mitigation Mitigation Credits
Established In Credits As Credits Credits Pending Credits,
Bank Of 17janO6 Used Available Success
Criteria Total In
Bank*
Pocosin Area, 886.8 490.5 355.93 134.57 396.3 530.87`
Pocosin/Pine
Flatwoods
Big Shakey, 143.4 143.4 127.56 15.84 0 15.84*
Bottomland
Hardwoods
Burned Pine 135.5 0 0 0 135.5 135.5*
Plantation,
Pocosin/Pine
Flatwoods
Burned Pine 84.8 51.5 0 51.5 33.3 84.8*
Plantation,
Bottomland
Hardwoods
Total 1250.5 685.4 483.49 201.91 565.1 767.01-
Table 3. Summary of Greater Sandy Run Mitigation Bank *These totals pending approval of performance criteria in
all portions of the bank.
8
The GSRA Wetland Mitigation Bank provides 1250.5 acres of restored and enhanced pocosin,
pine flatwoods, and bottomland hardwoods in the form of mitigation credits for Camp Lejeune.
Pocosin/pine flatwoods credits are debited at a ratio of 1.5:1 acres mitigated to acres lost.
Bottomland hardwoods are debited at a ratio of 3:1 acres mitigated to acres lost. A summary of
previously permitted projects in the GSRA and impacts is provided in Table 4.

Number ACTION ID Pine Flat Hardwood Credits Pine Flat Hardwood Project
Credits Credits Used Used Impacts Impacts Impacts
Used
P-949 199400693 25.88 0.00 25.88 17.25 0.00 17.25
P-933 199505124 .100.47 22.47 122.94 66.98 7.49 74.47
P-028 199701178 14.27 0.00 14.27 9.51 0.00 9.51
P-934 199707554 18.62 14.69 33.31 12.41 4.90 17.31
P-062 199901380 18.45 11.49 29.94 12.30 3.83 16.13
P-935 200001559 37.24 20.91 58.15 24.83 6.97 31.80
HWY 17 NCDOT 141.00 58.00 199 94.00 19.30 113.3
SR-7 200400940 0.627 0.0 0.627 0.418 0.0 0.418
Targets
(Proposed)
Totals 356.56 127.56 484.12 237.72 42.6 280.19
Table 4. List of previously permitted GSRA range projects
Camp Lejeune proposes to provide compensatory mitigation for this project by debiting 129.05
pocosin/pine flat (non-riparian) credits from the bank for 86.03 acres of impacts to non-riparian wetlands
at a ratio of 1.5 credits for every acre impacted.
References/Enclosures
Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Atlantic Division (LANTDIV). 2006. Final Environmental
Assessment, P-034, Construction and Operation of a Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Rance, U.S. Marine
Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina.
Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Atlantic Division (LANTDIV). 2002. Draft Range Compatible
Use Zone (RCUZ) Study for Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina.
9

N
A
Site Boundary 0 12,000 24,000
Feet
Map Source: Camp Lejeune Military Installation Map 1 Inch equals 8,333 feet
SR-8 MPMG
GSRA
Prepared: March 2, 2006
MCB Camp Lejeune Author: Land and Wildlife Resources Section Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Onslow County, NC Organization: Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune
Individual Permit Application Environmental Conservation Branch
y. v -.M. A- '%? -_.•,w` -- -? • -W- 4t- 1? t?'- - _ fiT? 7p? yea
ai"'
,k. -y„ -db-. :ir -?Sr -,ao- -14.- '. y,. ••M,- .
_..a •?6r` -.w. .y'" .w . ter.- ..iu. -
.? Jy= -'l"•. NL. - ? i : ,. -111.
- iG
J 1
? I
_?... - - -- - - ._ ?_. _ - - - -- t --- _ .} _
i

4 + - y, •x
l• _
?, IN
18 j'1

F {
ti
f,?

't1?-

0 Site Boundary
Map Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle, Folkstone
SR-8 MPMG
GSRA
MCB Camp Lejeune
Onslow County, NC
Individual Permit Application
0
Prepared: March 2, 2008
Author: Land and Wildlife Resources Section
Organization: Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune
Environmental Conservation Branch
Figure 2. Topographic Map
N
A
1,500 3,000
Feet
1 inch equals 1,500 feet
Ct
S /
Wo
St
1 To
Wo N.? C
FoA
St Wo
St
Ln
FoA
Fo
±i , .. / \ Wo
To
N
A
Site Boundary 0 800 1,600
Feet
Map Source: Soil Survey of Onslow County, North Carolina 1992 1 inch equals 800 feet
SR-8 MPMG
GSRA Prepared: March 2, 2006
MCB Camp Lejeune Author: Land and Wildlife Resources Section
Onslow County, NC Organization: Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune Figure 3. Soils Map
Individual Permit Application Environmental Conservation Branch
f t" ? ..y?•, Ar w+. ??r??Ay ,??~ + ~trM 'a ?+ iLF, f 11 r• ?, ?7r' y?? ?~ fh t ?{?
.?. .F' rrL ??ra .. !y, r ? ? ? e µ.,, `.. Y:?, ? jxk ?,i'? y .. .y M+ k?,',•' 3 .: r;: „r "' ?+a• "?" - .
Fil 1 .,. T = ' ??y.+?,? "r .s r.? e y ,'[• „,?w' .a _ q
J i" f 1 'h k'#r 3F flw"• M r r
.a+,,yr« P r.' . (" f°r ? ? -t a ? •, kr',•,r, t, ? # .:, sj,4„ r - - ..'r ? i ? y''• I?
? FN (,4.» x'~.tTu a4ri ?r._ + rar-.•Z...+ny ,K tiR^? • r `? i. ? ?a a'' "y .kaar.
t _ , ,,t ? r y,•.ti_ i f , v.. ?. w ? - . t j tr l ? '.x. 9 t ?,? ' • .
r rr ? * ?: 1 1^t S.: _.' ??. is 1''.% .?, `' e-f,',y?? y ?7.?1.x a ? r`, `??•. ~_'. ' °'. rr .:. i•.
R + ??. 1 • r tW y.: ? N J +t?' '?' ? "y. ? r . ?` t ? w?sj`_t?'
. 7r ?.}. *?yT? r i ?'"s ?', n l• Fr f Y?'rEA'!V r V;41 j.,
w . + F"' + - r F? f a ° . t 'r w.r . t{a` t ?. frr`_ „'-. ++'a? ? `r . A- . ?
r • * •• • I ,...l+tcL?*? ?":.f fit. r .f+. t T Mry ?? • '" r a '• 7 R• rti..,?'1 `P 1 ? r ?` 1 Ir
w•.. j?nt.'',' r d e.r i ,• f'r,,.. ..?' h '? ,?r, ••'+.. !.. l' f r ? ,?
...E k` tF etir k S a K+f p:Kr .. Jt? f.
t? r Is 1+ S ?( ?'' ` yiA._ '?• 1.... 4 r ••?
te.
1 t3
' J ? J ,? r ? yw. '.'! (r - ?, 1. rn ? A . r? 1, ? .r.?fl?"kj'w!??!d :. - 4? ?rw.:
' r w - ' r ; .I :' T ?t*..' 4 ar Y: •r#q. ,, .- r 1; . •ur-l?/?'.???' _
n• ?? h 7 7•'rr `. J ( i, x s¢ ; pV XTj T• f i..i'...
w z'. y k' +:•t '•+F ...i °?' 4?t / ,,, ? •r.-, t c?><..•,L 'A•? 7'` Y*'t.'.-?,i.lP ,?{'{?`T'f,• ,?,t.-J .? ??.
?' r •'> ;.; r+}Sxrr? "• ?~fAi 1` `? t' t..,tr x ? •, r rj A ;T+' !'. . .
+. 4?X6 .. : wl .. ..*k• f .>• F ;t? '? }C1r? -;a y ? t ; ? ,si y<<t ??:
'f` J w.f A"', ? ? i rr )ar S'r g, ye i 4' a w.? ,Lys i?tt ? ? ..,: + ? ?`•d -?'
v ? 1(. ? '? -- •'t,r '`M1A't"'#s:r '?'{ 4? .? ..S ttrN ti ?..
?.,rY ? ? r. ? y r ? r !?+ r ?. _. ^"txrx,?n 1 ,.,.-, R „; . k + % ? F -. ,w,?{ry:•t r ? ? `
s?r?'4r tit . ? ( . Y A?? J _ r ^ x '? t k " f ?.• ,? r t k±S?• „E r ! ,- ? .
f•t.? qx tR r4_yr•`,?4., r kr _ f ,. p./ ,J'_. ,.E l?r •? .' i ',w i t ?' ,.
is ?yFk?tL i?, f\'r •i:. ''?. t i? .9 1? _ . :y - • ? .. L. •`? . ...x•
h• .:fir • .,? a, r 1. +.. 'op r,.
o,..re i /
'J0. ?`?•'+ 9 r"?? `? Y ? _+JI4 rG .T •'« ? ?^ R,? -
je k.- IS
r ?x
.•,.•^_-
- A-4
?f'}. ?;Y :r 4,rY ?..ae ;•'.'_?°? .. "` ?•C" 'rY i 6? as--?,r17,??y`rbs1?'.,
sir ? ?: r t*"'w••y ?? •; t.. .r pr ' '? r\
w y' rr/ `w., t'b ./ rfit. "yka /Cwp.c?y ? •: ? ? ??
...,r, '? :eJr " t?, wn,'•';N? -.,, 1 `• fY ? yt -,. + ? + rt+ n.,,f`?? .; r{? r r .,;.
. ,? r '' t r ? r '•'„ t S # d r't ?/,; .. [ r k f ??'^?' *.ivyr M '4 „W
a?,? rte. •x„s, ? ., ?t ? /v ', ?.r 'J'I .'. ?. ?:. .. hfl`/'t`'r+ .?„y x.. IJI. l..
•r,. !t1'... r ..'t< a'r •a;,w,w „rr? 1 t p•- ?'• ti J.%!? r? r . '
N
A
Site Boundary 0 800 1,600
Feet
1 inch equals 800 feet
SR-8 MPMG
GSRA Prepared: March 2, 2006
MCB Camp Lejeune Author: Land and Wildlife Resources Section Figure 4.
Onslow County, NC Organization: Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune Aerial photograph of site.
Individual Permit Application Environmental Conservation Branch
r ? :F N y .f''Y}p r n4« `'7?pwM""' .. I..AM to.........
?'ri6'?+w+, ? qq?
•. • J •? AM•', .rN p ?.
-_+ r
?•s+^r ?L ffs3 r? .C r+'"- It'?S'1 ? .t YCtf ? ?r?4 } r ;,Y 9 ?,?
Site Boundary PF04 PSS nN
NWI CLASS PF04 Isolated SS4
PF01
- PF04/SS3 Upland 0 800 1,600
PF01 /4/SS3
------ PF04ISS3B Nondelineated Wetlands Feet
PF01/SS3 1 inch equals 800 feet
SR-8 MPMG
GSRA Prepared: March 2, 2006
MCB Camp Lejeune Author: Land and Wildlife Resources Section Figure 5.
Onslow County, NC Organization: Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune Aerial photograph of site
Individual Permit Application Environmental Conservation Branch with jurisictional wetlands.

I
•
•
?4 •
+ S1
•
•
•
I • •
•
r
?
? O
•

N
SR-8 MPMG LAYOUT A
Juristictional Wetlands 0 800 1,600
Feet
1 inch equals 800 feet
SR-8 MPMG
GSRA Prepared: March 2, 2006
MCB Camp Lejeune Author: Land and Wildlife Resources Section
Onslow County, NC Organization: Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune Figure 6. Project Layout.
Individual Permit Application Environmental Conservation Branch
7

t
ti
.
1 S t'

- i

4?

Nts:
r?
Jf c `? j?
»r ?
gs k • f
N
Camp Lejeune Boundary Proposed Live Fire Ranges n
Site Boundary Existing Live Fire Ranges 0 7,000 14,000
Generalized Location of MAC Feet
1 inch equals 6,600 feet
SR-8 MPMG
GSRA Prepared: March 2, 2006
MCB Camp Lejeune Author: Land and Wildlife Resources Section Figure 7.
Onslow County, NC Organization: Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune GSRA Live Fire Ranges and Maneuver Areas
Individual Permit Application Environmental Conservation Branch

I

ss; v
77,
• ,swig" ? N .;? ? ? a a,
{may*, .. $
N
GSRA Wetland Mitigation Bank 0 4,200 8,400
Feet
1 inch equals 4,200 feet
SR-8 MPMG
GSRA Prepared: March 2, 2006
MCB Camp Lejeune Author: Land and Wildlife Resources Section Figure 8. GSRA Wetland Mitigation Bank
Onslow County, NC Organization: Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune
Individual Permit Application Environmental Conservation Branch

E

E
F
L
BOLLARD
CABLE PEDESTAL
ABBREVI ATIONS USED CONCRETE MONUMENT
BZO BATTLE SIGHT ZERO
FIRE HYDRANT
C CENTERLINE
CSP CORRUGATED STEEL PIPE GUY WIRE
E EASi1NG POWERPOLE
EL ELEVATION
SANITARY SEWER MANIIQ
FFE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION
SIGN
M METER
MM MILLIMETER SOIL BORING
MIT MOVING INFANTRY TARGET EMPLACEMENT WATER METER
N NORTHING
BUILDING CORNER
N.T.S. MIDI TO SCALE
PC POWER CENTER EMPLACEMENT CONCRETE PAD
R RADIUS GRAVEL ROAD
SIT STATIONARY INFANTRY TARGET EMPLACEMENT FENCE
STA STATION
MAJOR CONTOUR
TYP. TYPICAL
MINOR CONTOUR
TREELtNE

C-147 C-146 METLAND AREAS
ROAD CENTERLINE

SIT
MIT
C-145 i? ? -.t-143
fl C944 PC

C-142
XA
t
3
4
N
200 100 0 200 400
z E
g
?w
V J
N
2 S U
o z
z
N a
w m
a O U)
V J
h E
8 4 w
Z
T` E a w
t ? F
? I
LEGEBC
EXISTING NEW
E Q
cy
r D
4
D
GENERAL NOTES.
1. BLOCKS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET REPRESENT THE SHEET MATRIX.
2. ALL CONTOUR INTERVALS SHOWN AT 0.25M.
3. SURVEY DATA OBTAINED BY U.S. ARMY ENGINEERING AND SUPPORT
CENTER. HUNTSVILLE.
4. HORIZONTAL SURVEY DATA OUTPUT IN UTM. NAD83. ZONE 18. METERS.
5. VERTICAL SURVEY DATA OUTPUT IN NAVDBB. METERS.
6. SEE SHEET C-148 FOR CLEARING LIMITS.
T. ALL ELEVATIONS AND COORDINATES ARE IN METERS UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN.
8. ALL SLOPES ARE TO BE GRADED TO 321 UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN.
9. DEMOLITION DEFINED ON SHEETS C-125. C-128. AND C-131.

PTO SURVEY CONTROL POINTS
NORTHING IYI EASTING 1X1
ELEVATION (2)
CLJ100 3832992.231 271952.566 22.142 BW
CLJ200 3832899.082 271822.454 21.769
J116 3833071.326 272186.111 21.204
11 E
_ NOTES.
1. ALL HATCHED AREAS ARE WETLAND AREAS.
7° 2. CLJ 100 AND CLJ200 ARE 3'n DOMED BRASS SURVEY MARKERS SET IN
>lnRW"miWMYW'?
/l ? CONCRETE AND STAMPED CORPS OF ENGINEERS. YEAR 2005. WITH POINT - R
DESIGNATION.
3. J116 IS A NORTH CAROLINA GEODETIC SURVEY CONTROL MONUMENT.
iWTWW1WT®T?
LJ AJ116 iw-
4OLJi00
{J?zoo
m -
l T
I I .S 1 Q I 9i
E
E

amq ? -r,as? ' 1 r

STONE `OAY
NE CHECK ? ? cEr RLAr N
{ CONTROL POINT.

/ t N 3632025.60
E-269907./1
EL 7T
00 \?

C-14 -144
1/
. F -

{ 1
/ EXIT DITCH CENTERLINE
\y\r t

6 * "AREA

-12
-IR C-1?C-1? -13
C
-126
a { N 3632016.46 \
E 269909.13 \F CE RO INE 17. -136 C-13 -13 -13
r
' EL 66.32 t \ { N.38 000 -12 i
PLANTED PIN TREES { t
{ t
a \ -13 -137 -13
-1 C-12
t i \
?\
a
t { F1
\ >?,s E
??
,, { { t
t
F \, \
y NDTESI
t 1 1. SEE SHEET C-SOI. ROAD AND
SIDEVALK

{ \
y
F
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD 1RGRAOE AND
Alm
UP
GRADE
CLEARING LIMIT.

^
4 1
\ 2. SEE SHEET C-513. MISCELLANEOUS
S 6 \ DETAILS. FOR EXTENDING EXISTING
CULVERT. >ZR'AR'.'i116RYf7F-
\
?

\
? t 1
\
S. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS
DETAILS. FOR OWING AT BIVOUAC
y{ SECURITY BAIN E _ k
\ AREA. N'1F1Y'1?Re0t
y 3 4. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEVALR
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
^
N 383Y900 5. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS -s-?-
{

r\ 1 DETAILS. FOR EXIT DITCH GRADING.
r s-
a
3i 6 r 6. SEE SHEET C-516. EROSION AND SE0114Ni
CONTROL. FOR STONE CHECK DAM DETAILS. _
_
=
7. SEE SHEET C-106. SITE LAYOUT PLAN.
{ FOR BIVOUAC CENTERLINE ELEVATION.

N 38 Z
j

INV EL216.29J' W
u

1 610YY CSP
N 3131666.07 Q
C = U
E 269950.86
IMY EL 16
24
u = U, o
.
TOIBE IOE1101./W W Q Z
U, CD 'm
N1 811862.44 a N
E 2699S7.47
INV EL 16.6}
CSP
Q LL

8
N 383
INV EL 1.6S
P,ANTEG P( , TREES PL-MIEE' PIKE TREES N 3831800 S 2
f
?
8 8 f
8
0 20 40 60m
r 100

C-131
C
B
A
1 1 z I 3 I ,4 I `J ----- - --
i f
1 7 'Z d ri
E
E

?
- - 1 ? c-11 -11 i

f N 3832300
_ . 1

1 53318i.z 301 CSP-ARCM ' _
N 3832272.16
E 269901
94
r^ r .. r
r
J TTY'
t . - _. ...._
FAANIE'0 PINE TR:E5 ,t -14 -1 M -11

C-t1 C-11 C-11 -13 -12
`
- ^ .
.
T. ` i -126
' ?
^` ; r t?l t s t -T3B C-73 C-73 -13

5737
3017 CSP-ARCH
t -12 + H + I fl g
x
t
75
y N 3832265.
t, t E 269893.97
t NV El 77 1>A -
\ ? - 7,1
!
t
r
533W x 381 ?81 CSP-ARC1i

02
\ N 30 221. t

f f
y t
t ?" aiSs

+ t
+ -n -1n

C-12
C-13 -13 C-12 t
4,
t
ti) 1 ?
\
t 920.20 t
517 20 E 269
? INV1 EL 17.06 ,

t
t \
t
S

t t t
t
S t

I
?•
E

`
G

I?
,
t
\
\ t S T
I
'K \1 r S33W ¦j1381MD CSP-ARCH
x 3e32231.10

\t y

w
\, t

t 4
t e

?E E
d tt
i
t t , \
.lE III . I2699250
.1 ? tt
?
,y 1
? It
V S
SIT 16
\\'
t tt('/ T 1 t t
781 CSP
53
1 t "t.: ' .
t ^? I
t
I
t NOTES:

\I 53 x 38 ` T
2
9
9
MV IB ,07
' "'
t\t s
1
I
\ 1. SEE SHEET C-709. SITE LAYOUT PLAN.
FOR MEOVAC CENTERLINE ELEVATION.
_

-- 3
1 O1 t 3W
383 z 1W C - i
07 a t
t
\ 2. SEE SHEET C-109. SITE LAYOUT PLAN.
FOR BUILDING FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS.
698
E 2698 84
1 E 269
NT 3.12
f
t
\
.00
INV EL ,,
t - INV
- 117.0 ,
N 3832 3. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS. ii
STATIONARY INFANTRY
1
SEE SHEET C-502
13 U? \ \ r \
y'` Sri7
36 CSR- 1 .
.
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
AW 86 tsWlr

ft \ 2x
!
83
EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
26995,
.23
INY E 7.01 r? \
tt ARCH
x t
'
\ S.
5. SEE SH TARGE TEEYPLACEYENT.AFORRDOUBLINF E SITRV =r-
\ t \ r\ 3Wx fW i7 1
/?
S
t 1.91
3
Y6ES •69 _ -,
\\
EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
i^-
i t
\ 5,?
E
283 .86
? IN ?
MEDV
CENT NNE L AREA
7
68 \ \
r? 6. SEE SHEET 0-506. FIRING BERM. FOR -` -

i
17 1 -1 EL 78. 53 832161 z 7,p CSP- CL .
\
? GRADING AT FIRING EERY.
' 26998 37 r .. - _ \ 7. SEE SHEET Ci12. MISCELLANES
OU

SIT 3 l
337 x B1W. -
INV E 6197,
VAC
DETAILS. FOR GRADING AT NEND
N 383
1 i 111611 ?? l
53]7 381 SPA

997436 \
v

\ LANDING AREA.

8. SEE SLEET C-592. MISCELLANEOUS
OXTAILS. FOR GRADING AT BUILDING

Y
9
?
IT 2 ?. o EL 90 t Y
1
\
i
\ EXTERIOR. L
l ly
O
S1
t t *' " - 3 ,
. \
\
li \ 9. SEE SHEET 0-512. MISCELLANEOUS
DETAILS. FOR EXIT DITCH GRADING.
t
EXIT DIT N1E
,,µµ 383210 € tt

f
816
"E 383. 1 0
S CSP- CL+

1
j
?/
// I, „

S3 3W 381 -
\ N 30 30.90 ,

\\ ``,

\

10. SEE SHEET 0-512. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.
FOR TARGET SERVICE ROAD TURNAROUND. Z
L IJ
LOj J
y
EL 16?9
1 t? `w ? ? •91 E2 18.10 \` 9>
?t ,
r p,i)III'i i 5 z 1 CSP-

r 11. SEE SLEET C-511. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.
Fp?pM Z
BERM LOCATION AND GRADING o
= to a
1
t 2. \*
H
TO
` ? .
DETAILS. o
a
' _ ' 31
E 832it
5
.
3
CSP-M .,27 18 1EDVAC LANDING AREA
CENTERLINE EL 17.68 -
m
7L U, O
t
\ } 1W -
` 6 lyV EL 6.93/
• , j N TB a
533W z 381 - .89 t / X\3832100
J 0. DN
E 269911.36 S
\ INV EL 16.92
n
L Sf

.,
\
a
7 ?
Z
Bi0 F??ING
\
LINE \ N t \
537W
x - C 1
\
?- ?
' r r
`
at .. t
'. t
\
t tL V
Z 2
t

2
1
9
,1M,
?
9T'
t /

? `

S33M ZW CSP-ARCH
t

N
0

6 d

It

E
tvv
Z
3 ?I x 1W -ARCM ?'
32 91 537 ' ]8 1W
-AR
'! N3 8y2X089.30
? E 990 T
1 EL 16 1
f
ly,
3032070.21
N
E 269891.79 \ "'
? I ?0
_ ?•
'^ .63.:._5. ? _
1
<` E 219913.
.'
:pr,>i
yV!EE 00.6"'
.. t
.'
INV EL 16. Be \
\ ?
IT OIT CENTE
INE -
' 5337 7817 SP-
W, x }} 7W C ARCH f N 38 076.93 0 '? t
- _ \
5337 x 381W;C
N 383201 70 d >,,
\ >
1
755 3632 12 ??j
E 269 .81 j /? 1 83 75 7 f E 2 9967.
626 S9 / IMV EL f6 9 :1 \
0 20 40 60m
E 269896
-.
t
INV EL 76.88 \ EL / .89 INV 16. t , \ TROD

C-132
0
C
B
A
1 1 2 1 3 1 4 5
1 2 .3 4. 5
E
i
IT 27
SIT 33
EXIT DITCH C NTERL [ME E 69722.U' / t t
`j
5t i?
ROAD INY6El21T,OBtt ' 7. SECTIXONST fOR ROAD SEGTIONSSIDENALK
ilfitic"i/lBliT
EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
li'881r .B'i??
i
?_..
S
3 32 1
E
3 0 W
g
B? m n
EXIT DITCH CE TERLINE
J W
a
Y> _
_ (K
STONE C"' lK DAY
7E N
E269!23.7?
?d N m ¢
a ? ? z
a ? a
e e i rc
C 133-"-
5
1 2 3 4 -"
SI7 ., -"--'. IL C'? •?78,Q` ??

72300

577W Y iW CSP-ARCM -126
`S7JW x 781W CSP-

- "' N ]8]2219.67
N 787229
QCH
? E 269617
?
+1
+7
? l11

'
-178 C-13 C-11 -13
E 26%S?.tD
INV ELit7.l$ 4W 'EL 1 .73 _
SIT 21.
, S t1
t 1t
t t -lt
-17 -73

? ]
?
/ W z 381W CSPrARCM / C-12
?
• ? ?
~ l N 788254.8
E 269 +
631.43
INV EC 17.29 ?. ,
E N
\ t SIT 32 1

1 e72270.22

El 17.21 "SIT +-
t 1
? tt
'
t t 1?, SIT 81
'---

? \ ? ? t
- - 577W z 381W CSP-ARCM
IN?EL 1
? 917 27 ,
537W III SB7W C 1 t
-MGM '
NDtE57

+ SAT 22 N 3872197.01 , 501.
`
IT O[ CEN7E
INE
} E M322 pm
EL 1 10,11 - $7pNE
,CONTTR2 POIND? PC 1
'
N M3 2233.03 ? w? t
E / ?? t
t
2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
EL /7.179

m 2
3. SEE SHEET C-503. STATIONARY INFANTRY
1 _, TARGET EIPLACEYENT. FOR DOUBLE SIT
f E%1] DITCH CEN7ERL1
\
'
1, f N 7872 19,.79
\1 E 269770
+7 577 7 CSPi L
?
8
30
\
1 +. SEE SHEET 0-512. MISCELLANEOUS
OETAIl3
FOR EXIT DITCH GRADING

t
/// .

.- ".
1 69
2
s
El .O6 1
t ' 1 t ? .
.
5. SEE SHEET 0-509. POMERCENTER
///
-- ? 1
EXIT 0I7CN C ERLI t 1
pI7CM'CENTERLI
n 1
? EIPLACEAEN7. FOR P08ERCENTER
EIPLACE/EN7 DETAILS.
x 7032790.+7
E 269710.+2
EL 77.10
,
t
N 269( 7
? 17.•
6. SEE SHEET C-572. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.
FOR TARGET SERVICE ROAD 71HNARdINO
1 1 STONE CK D t
? I LAYOUT.
1 1

1 (M COST 2751?2st
4
?
E 69799.7!
77.75,= 47{ IT DITO CENT ME ,
SIT Es

\
7. SEE SHEET 0-576. EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL. FOR STONE CHECK DAY DETAILS.
E 269
EL Bt7.?8
{
SERVICE.... R( 0
N 1832132.60

E 269820.27 t
j EL 16.87
/ CONTROL DINT
- N 353213!
- _ EL 1710 .75
N 38321

E't.ANT''. PENS E.ES
a 7,0

0 20 w som

; 11
:m
O
O
um

1 I 7 1 3 I 4 1 5
E
1

S33M z 361
N 1632720.7
E 2692.7•.9

? CSP-AR0
r
t ?x

J/
t
TARGET SERV, I?4tW011D S _.
fi
?' gnah
li w
?`
2?61f
TyET SERVIC apAD: sD 16R l:Sf
- J
i,m'l i SIT . C-11 -1.6
- i ` N 36723

\ Y?0 b ?.00M C
S
com
T CNEC?NOI(N

323077.57 g1pRL7?iE' t 18.p .'
tI 1
i
N ]872216. /
E 269332.23

i
x6"06 le
t 8
El UPS
>tt ,$ SOTgEq, T?OAY
l t. \
N 30b2tb. f "
_ C-14C-,. C-I. -13 -12
-126
-136 C-17 -13 -17

- - - - - - - - -
- - - - -
-- - - - - - -- - - - - - -
- - - - {
E

?. - 2.T6.?
l t _ EL 17.

2

j
TARGET SERVICE ROAD 7
IB.p

- - - - - - - - - - - -

_ _ _ _ ._
?/
C)! llltUllt

EXIT OITCN CExTERL INE '^ 1]
137
C-12
C-17 -/i C-12

57316/ z 38
3672702
W CSP-ARCH
DITCH CENTERLINE
2 EX '''' E J3,760.29 if t 1 t

i s
`

ig
N
.
E 269244.5 N 3632302.11 ' t
l
sett t • t _ ?>S
INV EL IT. 6
] E 2692...01
EL 17.33 _ ,..E Y DITCH CENTERLINE
N 3632256.16
E 269405.12
EL ,T...
i'ty c

NOTES,
,. SEE SHEET C-50,. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
?-
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS. _
4
y

l

RY
2• SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY

FOR Fpi SIT
EIFLACE T
Si
/
f fN 3032204 EWLAC
EIPLACEIENT DETAILS.
7AlL5. AIR,R"WI6??
3. SEE SHEET C-S72. MISCELLANEd15
DETAILS. FOR EXIT DITCH GRADING.
.. SEE SHEET 0-512. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.
F TARGET SERVICE ROAD TURNAROUND
OR

R66nr6nzar,P.t-
"`.
??'°^+ j\...
/ + r/
?? AYOUT.
L
S. SEE SLEET R STOW EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONROL. FOR SipE CIffCX DAN DETAILS. ?-
i-?•-
-6-'w -

} i U

?
W a
8

-a
J
? J
W
i d Q
p U
= Q W
N C3
U
PLANT 0 PINE TREES

Z
01
Z
a
N 3832101
J
U,

Q
K f7
2
d U a
u
e e f W
= ?

s s s s
0 20 w fide
6eao

C-134
D
C
B
A
1 1 2 1 j 1 4 ' S
I I

1 C 3 y :J
E

t

?
3 t?
t ??
2
N NOTES,

f ?-

4. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLA1E ID1151Y'??AT-
Rf-

269i
?1
0 _Jt r

S. E
6
9 a

TARGET EMPLACEMENT DETAILS. y??r

'SI 38

5. z
I E

M
S
a ? a

E

z w
J
IL
? J
W
N 3632400,1
Y
o z
p
O
= Z W
Q O
Z
Q
J ? m
y a
Q Z
a U a
F w

PLANTED P
%E-#&EES ! 6 z
F
Ima #
SIT 8 g

C-135
D
C
B
A
1 2 3 4 "'-"
5
`
/
1

\ SIT 59 }331Y ]S1W
CSP-AACN
? - M 75]259.99
E 25975.16
? INY EL 17.59
l A
Y tSYb C-t? -t?

+
_ t YI ANTEp
r IRE (:LEES C-f/ -74+-7.

f
M3
0 IIIIII
.CSP \' C-14 C-14 C-14 -73 -725 -12
\
553235
SIT }Y
6
, \
9
9'

_
t ' NY
11
EL
\^

_
',
y0
-735 C-13 -1
'SfTK
? Oti
' t l -72
t ?
? a -13 -73
-17

i
l
t C-7
2
t
?
? •
SIT SS- ^
\ e ? o
/ ?11.0
_+

7
•1 l\
`
1. SEE SHEET C-01. ROAD AID SIDEWALK
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.

2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET EYf4ACEYENT. FOR SIT
I 19.0 EIPLACEIENT DETAILS.

0
I
5J7W 381W CSP-i11CN J. SEE SHEET L-007. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET EtPLACEYENT. FOR DOUBLE SIT
M l532H7.2T
E 269503.09
EMPLACEMENT OETAILS.
17. _
INY
56
0115 DETAILS.
FOR TARGET SERVILE ROAD TURNAROUND
LAYOUT.
F 533W % 7Bt W -
y' ? w

5
? ? "' --- '^
^ \
'?"!? S. SEE SHEET C-5W. IDYIMG INFANTRY TARGET
EIP
FOR (DYING INFANTRY
ACEYEN7
77.57
INY EL
?• 1 7^99
?_ t .
L
„r'? .?- _

/ / t? ? x
36^ N 3572!7 T
y ( ? ?? tl E 269
565.
EL tTi

?
4
9

-
.

'i? ? 32765.11 t`7 l t
' t

?
-
MIT 1 1
h t
4 77.]9
s r r ? „r
k
- ?
,
l +
SIT 35 _____ 4ir

_

2e h
U
o zo w Som
%600
I

1 M
1 1 9 1 3 1 4 1 5
E
I

r /" , , z ? , Wry N

PIANTED PINE TREES \i C-14 -14
r

`
?
S11 72
l,
+
/ r
\ \
?
` C-14 C-14 C-u -73 -12
-126
OS-T 63 i i
PC 2 /
i
? \
r
-738 C-ll -13

9IT 71 i
V /
S -t2

! -73
C-12
'
f ( T
E i51T 70 i A6.0 C-13 -17 C-72 ®
f J.` ` j 51T-69"
10.0
5175
$B (
?

6• i
1 517 fib r
t SIT 53
/' N 38325
?
NOTES:

r

? r.f n?"`+? ! r f YIT 2i
/.. Y
7
777
? /Q
+
r t SIT 92
'~ ` i
f \ / + 1. SEE SHEET C-5 1. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
_
18.0 r
/ O
_
`. ! r
}
1
/! t t
7
®SIT 6TH i i t \t\
i
O ^? `\
e• / r 7
? 2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.

K1T7. w--?IM

s
i
s 1 ~
/
\
1T' 3. SEE SHEET C-505. POWERCENTER
EMPLACEMENT. FOR POHERCENTER ?-
SIT 6

`
l \ i

•
EMPLACEMENT DETAILS

\
vr
/J''-•. t "-?-.n /
/ i..
r ? 4. SEE MET C-572. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.
,
\
\ .
i .
l
\
\ ' FOR MANEUVER TRAIL CA-OE-SAC LAYOUT.

TARGET
S. EMSEE PACE
FOR MOVING NFFANTRY
I ii
w zw w

,r
/
\ SIT 49 EMPL
EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
TARGET
i?-
s
/ SPT
65
\ s ?fi• t SIT A8? ?! i t \ i_
? \ \ .c9•? ? / F
? Jt
^
517 64 \
\ ? , ?' ?7?-? u
p 2
,\\ /
? e. ?-.r, x , !
? f.'.f"?
! ! "
^^ to ¢ W Q
v
t z
-
0 / t ? 1 SIT 46 r ?,..
._ ._
__ =
J r."?; C
v _
X0 ^ . O 7 W

` 5 T 62 533W z 38110 CSP ARCH
' N 3632744.56 ._-' -.-=sPT: 4B"' r ,' "y. -
."" ?%'..?`? -
,.
r
? , r'•''/^ ' .tq-p
... ' M- = a
41 m
N Z

a
? E 269496.!4
Y9' 4y 1. EL 17.51
_ (
-
m
_ ? - N
¢
SIT 61 ¢

IT 42 P?4N 1f0 tgl0 ".
SERVICE RW 4 /
PIkE Tk€E^} ,
IISV Y
53310 ,z 381 W CSP-ARCx ?
?

- N9832yyy7 30
" £ 269196a18
.•
t ?
r?
0 20 40 BOm
INV y hN9
E
t i

7:600

C-136
D
C
6
A
1 1 2 1 3 1
4 ' S
7 1
1 1 7 1 3 1 a 1 Fi
E

1
rt r
s
• (?? ? 1
E t oT}r 1
l
r `.tT.9 ? l
/
9 "
t T

SIT
KEr WEAN N

t 6 1
- _ /
.
,
P
jE ?P1.•E'i £
r
u ltpt I
-
l t
1? 1 / ?-NTED PEN£ TREES C-14 -74
n i 1 {

IT 1
t _- /

1 l 1
OSIT
/
C-1?
It ! \
' ( ?
SIT 9 /
1 C-14 C-14 C-
% I l
t ¢ I _, _ _ __ -138

t- Le

1T.0 114 -12
!

t ?
------------ \\
t 1 E ` _ _ . _ r ?
I 51 1 i't I ° -
? o - - t rf /

It
A j
vain _ _ .. _
Aft
t c N
NOiESs
_
_ 51 772 ,?{p l SITr93

l
l
'
` 1 l

J 1. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.

- " - ,/!
-31 T

/ 1 ?q /
/

J 91f 92 1 / 82
E t

t 2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.

MgN-fvlf?T.T
f
t
IT 710 t t ]. SEE SHEET L E ROAD MISCELLANEOIJS DETAILS.
FOR TARGET SERVICE ROAD TURNAROUND
_
/ t LATQ17
7 n
.9 " \i \h O
\ t
\
ttt SI Tt91 M1 / .
\
t ti` is 79.0

T "0 / SIT 01
for
?? `I Il\ t
1 11( O'
0? i???
i w?
,I l .
! / l)

t 1
s'O ttli
» 1 ?ttlt 11 /
t
1

?!

-- __ t .-
\ N 3832400 w
u
t iA
1 .t i\iP t
!
(11? 1> a
= 6 =

S T 80 2 N O
4E

._--'._
h
\f rlt \
t
l t((i A\
?t
H i\. 16.0 11 cmi a
?
J
t
s' tlp?t
- .--
l
n

`• Y ?

6 F- Z f
7
TARGET SERVICE ROAD 6

-. \ ? 0 20 40 BOm
t r \ tt ?
- i 1:600
?
.Aw
C-137
D
C
B
A
1 Z J 1 4 1 Z)
1 1 7 1 3 1 4 I 5
E
t

? 1 -
a o-u -tA

f J

.
?\ ERVIC
"6,

s
i
SIT 1
17 9\ to 1

'
C-1 -th1 -t4
C-14 C-t? C-1? -tl -tt
-126

C-13 -73 -13

'` s ,
.,
1 ` \
t
?
517 7 -13 -t37 -1J
C-12

'
\ \ N 3632500 NOTES,

,? .. .. _ ;.
•.:Y,a t. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDERALN
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
{ 2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET MENT EMPLACEMENT. FOR 517
EMPLACEMENT TAILS.

>Mi. R-'file?
J•
SEE ET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.
FOR TARCE SERVICE ROAD TURNAR0WN0
LAYOUT.

LAHTE iFE Tf \

a. p \
? 2
\ Y W
! 2
D? Z W a
f
/
N 3632400 - J W
= N v IL
a
Z
"I
10

x y1
Z IWl1 m
J O y

O
2
/?
/??
? Js E 1
? ?
N 1•
e s f =
?rc O
?
~
~? 0 20 w 60.
t4;Do iiiiiiia

C-138
D
C
B
A
1 1
z I 3 I 4 1 -
1 1 2 M 3 1 4 5
E

Sir tO ,1 s ! / -- iELbY1 N
•0 1 -
,
SI 66 ? 1

t ! C-18 -iK6

144
+ IC-14#-
V-141
1

° .1.
!•
° „ - -
" 1-18 C-18 C-lt -
2
-126
,. i . _..' ? -778 C-13 C-13 -13
_. -12 j
_._... ..._..... -13 C-12
-17 C-12 t

\ ? ? ?? ?\ Y N 3832800 $g

\C NOTES,

."+
Y

T
.C
TERL111
18
N 38]2 6

11
1. SEE SHEET 0-701. ROAD AND SIDENALK
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
n
^ j
.
2697 88
EL?i,7.29 ! i
r - _ 2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
SI 69- EMPLACEMENT DETAILS. BFI. F?rliQil?

-- STONE CHECK DAM
/ 3. SEE SHEET C-712. MISCELLANEOUS
DETAILS. FOR EXIT DITCH GRADING. M'T
_
,,,",L.
•-_•, ,???--
` MO3632734.97T
E 269782.93_ 8. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.
FOR MANEUVER TRAIL CUL-DE-SAC LAYOUT.
_•. ,_,_

J EL 16.83- '

-
7. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS. +z
"
-M 08 y
, , !
?' , \ \ F
I FOR TARGET SERVICE ROAD TURNAROUND
LAYOUT.
i -
w

/ EXIT 15 2705.5. 36NTERL NNE
N
3 6. SEE SNEE7 C-516. EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL. FOR STONE CHECK DAM DETAILS
i°-
- -- 933W x 781 W CSP=ARCH
N 3832677.82 - _ E 269772.8
17.76
.
+ r
??
E 269709.77
-
r .
i9
i .. -.. 1
IMV EL 17.40" +
- t N 3832700 U
- - - ----------
?
Y

_
w
Sm To-
r z IL
N338326 36'W CSP-ARCH
72
97
1
1

\
?
Y>
Z Z
V
aY
E
0
'I-26
Mal NY EL 1
SIT 76 -
-
?'/
?
2
Q

Q? SIT 76

® \ a
517 TS TARGET SERVICE ROM
f
SIT 71
r r /
` / ` n
' 0 20 80 60.
- ,
i Y W - -
N 3832600 14500

?C-139
C
B
A
1 1
2 ' 3 ' 4 ' 5

E
F
1 L. I 3 I 4
S)T 138 -SIT 139
o ?' '/' t t t t
t ! Y
IT 13T
t
ow 1 S ^ r _ -? ' IT 101
106
t _
t
N 3632
,w
SIT lj « / SIT
SIT 133 1 /'/' f r o - ^
"a
7 1
A /oo/S I
F.
SJT 131 ?' i7 Ir"1M" p _,t
ii
v .103
SIT' 127.. -
'SIT 129." _ -' °. 1 / ?/ J / / ` ?.
S17 128
IT 10 t ^ n
..:....................................... t r 3832700
i 1
,
PT 1 r
of / SIT t t' ` /' /' rr \
SIT sa
y J _
A" S ? t \ `_ rr j! r rr
f
t t 9 6 i
It E Ult 3
PINE TREES
TARGET SERVICE ROAD 6
SIT 97 1 r ? ` r
' j ... r ` t. S ' 32600
1 7 7 A
0
y? N

C-N -1?6
C-11 -tq -It
C-11 C-14 -13 -12
-126
-139 C-13 -1 -13
_Ip
-13 -133 -1J
C-12 ,
C-13 -13 C-12
1,31 E

NOTES, r
l
1. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS. _
2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
EMPLACEMENT DETAILS. 1lRTI. '.-WIKR.WR'W-
3. SEE SHEET C-505. POKRCENTER
EMPLACEMENT. FOR POHERCENTER
EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
?. SEE SHEET C-SOA. MOVING INFANTRY TARGET
EMPLACEMENT. FOR MOVING INFANTRY
TARGET EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
M

4 u -
a
a =
M i ¢ ? a
9999
e w
$ Z

[> a
a
z
to = U a
W o
^ y O

Z
Q N m Q
J
a O y
¢
?

C
U
IL o
!
,= = 0:
u
N 9 = x
e
X
F
V4LW
0 20 40 60.
1.600
C-
F
1
A
I / I -S I Q 1 9 l
E
E

PINE 'K 1

J
's --??'5J3-MY. 1 -ARCH \ O
8\3832862 /

t
SIT 164\\
\
\

p *.- " + N
KEY
?
!
E 6 76 66 / ;

r r ? ?1 381W CSP-ARCH
M\4m S73W
tl 38]2
tir,
,269088 911 6095
' E
"- /• - •> -

_ ..............._..,,._._...._.,
f-- ..................
/
C-tt -1?6
{
ygu{y - r•
M 7J BJ2851'%2ttt?if-ARCM
? r 1MEL 16.(5
! lxr''t.?-! 33W x JB1W CSP-ARCH ?
` ?'""v-?.,?-..:

?
} ! C-1• -1•4 -N

C-14 C-1• -1] -12
..

- :. •
\` ,. ?
-

t E 26908
96
IN
I
r 6.67 3

x.,a1t 3832861.2
E 269091
97 ` -. _

1
• .

-126
\
\ ..
. J
B
? ? t
.
.
INV EL 16.66 - ` _. - ....,, ? • / ..sa-_..?... .,...,.? ...._,...._ ....................... _
' -738 C-t7 -13 -13

`
Y

i
I \ f
Vq
V
in?
I
/'

i
f
-12
j
\ M
\ ,
y t -13 -133 -13

"0
sit" 54
-13 -13 t

. - ?. ! ixk \ \ C / ....C.__.....,,,,. _ _ -

} J c SIT 167
?
?
?
'
?? ? \
?
/
7 ?\ T 6
S j
7
'I \
^, ?.? i ! i
t t M / 5\33M91 x 381W CSP-ARCH
tt\tfl ?l ' \ E 3632 52896
?
\ \

NOTESt
_ y \
! t INV EL 16:84
\I>;?' \
\
\ 1. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
• A
? '
_- -- -.._.' -- t
\d r t \
t ! ! t \
r
f 2. SEE SNEET C-S02. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
SIT I53 ! i O EMPLACEMENT DETAILS. i17AR"?18RWR'R-

' x 381w CSP-ARC
. t
?
?
?
?
' ' \

'
t 2
to\\21 ?. N 3872752
E -9122.41
\ INV EL T6.93
` \
27
'^ w
q
t ? \ . T
Bnll /? "SIT "T26
_-
S 0
62
?
- _ ..x.383 700 - u
f?
/ _
J IT 124 z
-
m t F J W
"."
`.,, .-
f "?",- I '?
Y 1 _?'„ SIT 122 u
U)
0

• ./ i p(>N!Ea InE '; RF
` 'o 'S fat \

\
14
t
R.
0 0
a u
-Z
J'o

n
' f
.
5
f x` t k
! i ]617Y CSP ;y
83261TAS
69175!09 ty ! %
?A?.26
?
y ? --
1
H-121

N

! W
H Z

7
o: ¢
O

/
J
?/ . •' / +.

. ?.c -.r_;s:* ` . - ''
SITraTS ".• t r ,. / a
A

577 x tw CSP ARtx \ o, ?;
E 926 .762 .' \ \ 14"77
•

..
SIT 120..._ i.Y\.....niaNp'Ee pica, mus /07

£
f

=
7
17.27 J/ ,?
/j 1 a 0 20 10 60m
\ r i
I J SIT 14 ? -^t N'?832

?C-141
0
C
B
A
1 1
2 ' 3 ' 4 '
A w
1 M 7 1 3 1 4 1 Fi
t
t

' f
f'
6Ex.ner N
r
r
f ?
/ rr \
?
t

r r
r
/ /
S f ?
IT 1 -

/ c-1? c-1x _u -12
-126
r -136 C-13 -13 -13
r -12
j C-17 -137 -13

YL.ANT4,U Pi?rf. TREES

t
t: ?„ C-12

C-17 -13 C-12

il
•

?
r NN 303
'

t /

f
\\\ NOTES,
r ' 1. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.

j 2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT

'
i
1
'?3
L7T EMPLACEMENT DETAILS. ;1F1. 1r•'Wf?i
?

r

r
f ,
.
?C.. 3. SEE SHEET C-512. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.
FOR TARGET SERVICE ROAD TURNAROUND O
r
t' `? LAYOUT.
% f / 1
c ? ?
t
s
sx

f /' c '
{}/ i ?e
1c

s t \ ' N 3632 v

1
1
6
A Z
2

`
t t ?
_
.
M
? W
W
LL
Z

'
c

/

=m
J W

;>\ V

..s.. ^ SIT 1 ;,
\ .

`\ ?'

o IL

to
a
¢
3
t l \ U
£ ¢
\, ¢
N M O
6

yr
c
w• ?
a N
rc o
z

+
\517 1

N

s d =

=a
O
?? \? J \ ? ?
8 \, + g \,' a
$ . 0 20 so 60.
t 3632 1;800

?uM
?C-142
D
C
B
A
5
1 7 , q 1 4 1 Fi
t
1

\ ' ' ..

N ST DIT = NTERL INE

E 26 110
.59 STONE CHICA DAY ............ ......

CONTROL POINT
N 78311H.21

E 269568.75

EL 16.601 ?? .....,,............,._.,....,

--

.
8EY PLAr

-14 -t1

',. grin
-'
ti

\ .54
EL
=1J?: ?

.
IT DITCH NTERLINE'? 783377 96 _._------- -._--------------- --------- .,
269575.53 ?
...._._ .............._._.........._,.........__......_....,,..___.__...,-._..--....
C-14 + -111

W4
\53
M

E
- 1 W INN CSP-ARCH /
331 82

69 7.21 /
16.54 16.45, _ -_ -?-?
%Ii -
dLTCH CENTERLINE
3873108'.95,
- C-14 C-11 C-74 -13 -12

-126

-778 L-11 -13 -13
269577.51
L 16.46 6.13400 -12 j
-il
13 -

/
_ _.. _ .....,w.
_...,.._-_....._._.__....._ ---------- ................_..._........... _................ C_I
C_
C 13 17
C-12
`
off
- 00

!W A 781 CSP-ARCH ?_ ._ - ,.,.'"............
62.29
-UNFL, 16.54

^
.? NOTES.
17.0 ... -.
-
.. 1 STOE CHECK DAY ?
CONTROL POINT ......_
....._.._,....._..t,,.., ..,..t;..._.....
___.._..__,,,. _
,. •'.
7
SEE SHEET ROAD AND SIDEWALK
FOR FOR ROAD SECTIONS
SECTIONS
,.
.,...._. -.--.._,.._......_
.. ,._....._._.._..._.-.--------- -._.__......_.__._..._._._ - ..... ._.?.-...___.-.
E 2
6057r8E----
E 26996607
16 .
.
® 1 .
•
O EL 16.79
.-3., _...-__ ______-___._-._...-..?__-._. .. .- N SEE
IWSIT INFANTRY
2•
E
A
E awm
517 158 c T
EIPLACEIENT.
FOR
G
T
EMPLACE/ENT DETAILS >H---W18agR1-
.
m, 3. SEE SHEET 0-512. MISCELLANEOUS
......--..._.-._ ............... pE7AIL5. FOR EXIT DITCH GRADING.

,,
,..,... ,..._.,........._..,_......,.-.-_....__...___,..? .............._._.
_„-___,_-.,.. ::,.,`.`.,_:_. 4
SEE SHEET C-576. EROSION AND SEDIMENT

gW1E•?.p,?
. c ..
..--._.\.._..._...----.._..,--.-_._.. „ CONTROL. fOR STONE CHECK DAM DETAILS.
• --_ _-._--_.., _.. __._-.-........._...... _...... _..........._.__........._? ..,_-_... ,_...:_'-__-"•_--•__._....._,,,-._.._...__._..,...._..-___---_ A
M

..........................._............_..._._.........._..._.._
N 3833000
l ?
? J u

t
n
-- -- - - ----- ---------
?..-.
x

.mar
• , i ?' ` .. a., ... . STONE CHECK DAM
1 N 1
o f SIT 11 3 32959.58
B ,E`26964,,501
m
y_51T 149-?-' _• ----°--....-_.._......... _._.-._.__.._.=__..,....;,.,,,r._::,, p ? z w G.

SIT 146 1 511
T
STONE CxE
z
DAY y
O
-
A-3 0TROL

-
9664.
E 262 ,a
INT__..-_...------- _._...___------------- > w
y> Z =
¢

EL 17.08 u

¢
s _'?'
I I J
1 a
IT 145 EXIT 01
N ]8129 H CENTERLINE r
91 t PL-TED 7iNE TREES O U,

J
O
!
Q

E 26966
21 -
.
¢ ¢ a 2
¢
SIT 7 e
,.,._...-_.,...._...___.._ EL 16.8 O
a u O
C
¢
..
.. . .-S1I'_L42,
...__.---' ----- \
I 5778, x 781W CSP-ARCH
x 3832891.94 5J3W
2692
61
6
9 1._ -.
181W CSP-ARCH
5
6 f
N !
?• w ¢
J G, O
i I ..........__.-,._. 1.ti
i
? 6 E
6.
EL
INV
INY EL l
07
16.96 , N 7832900
8 b ? ¢
'

__.._._.._ j _
".5r::.::.......,_. t 1
_.--____'-'_`..t:«:-?a-s-ei-:? p
7 ` 1
SIT 140 ? ,?
Al SAL:Srv ..,..._....__._.___................. 1._...._.._.__... ' ..'
r ?\p 1
' t• 1
-r
//
0 20 40 60m
ITT 179' t ,
ff 680D
o
.?
C-143
D
C
B
A
1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 _"___

1 9 Z
E
t

/ /? cEr Ray N

o
r I /' r C-1? -1?
\

? r
i
T'17 ,

!

?
C-t? -7S -126 -12
??f
\ t ' A? •? jE ;' /
/' r
N
1 -13SC-13 -13 -13
-12
\

to E

,
/ 7473
00
I
?. .- -77 -133 -13

[C C-12
C-7J -17 C-12

?

i tt
IS

,
SIT )T5 {
fIT 67
' \ NOTESs
1
SEE SHEET ROAD AND SIDEWALK
trt• '?
, ? I
t. i ! f' rc._O "- ? ,? .
SECTIONS. . FOR FOR ROAD SECTIONS. _
.. ??.
-, a• /' ! f• - `,'// / _- 2. TAARGETEEMPLACEMENT. FOR INFANTRY
,r O j
` EMPLACE NT DETAILS. 1?IRR-fVIK?T-

r'

r t 3. SEE SHEET 0-505. POVERCENTER

r EMPLACEEIENT.DETTAAILLSISERCENTER
r
r
r

-_._ •?'? i ! -__._+ ?. SIT
y r
\ t
r
??'` O t 5

r
T 1ST t
?
1
._.._._._..........._...t ............... _.__.....,._..__.

Y\ ,/ PC
'. / _ ._-.?! \ \`t fit.
r-........-,..__._..._._......_._....__....i? -..._.._...,,.,_? •' ?EE? ..a . ., r
. ' ._.-_.... ... .....__._,.._Tf.._..._-......_,........._
r i ..
i
_........__..... >
p z
U
L_ ?

SIT 165;
y .. '" 6 Tt 15b
....
......._ ........................t..........__....._.
=
W m
Z
/ r' ...---._= =-?._.?_-. :...:?:_._
\ -_•_"------.y.._ ......__..«..- ... t a as
Ix n

/ r

? _

1 Ir
0
C,

CC

i TARCE SERVICE ROAD 0 i S
y 1• i

a
ET tss
/' ?'
o 20 w aDm
r ua t6oo

C-144
D
C
B
A
1 1 2 1 3 1
4 ' S

1 1 7 1 S 1 4 1 ri
t
t

t

a t N
0
? , I
E
n
l1 ? f
l11 ? C-1, -1,6

Ut?
-12
\ ,
y
om/
4 -126
l
tl?
AEAHFGO ?{{;?
t HEEg -138 C-13 -13 -13
rill 4
l y t N 3933100
-12
i
t 1,1t t. 1
? -1-13-1]
C-12

•\? ? `\ Ill,,} l
t t t
IIl C-1J -13 C-12
t ? t4

1 a J
y ?y^yy
, I
d t t
? 6
t ? t
`
I EXIT
N 787 ITCH CENTERLINE
• 1
86 ' A
17
:;
NOTES:
\ E 26
EL 15. t
.
7.78 yat t ,
9 ' ' /

t
1. SEE SHEET C-SOI. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
:4 1
lyy ?t
/ SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
Q 2. SEE SHEET 0-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
y
I `??
FOR SIT
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. T
TAILS
EMPLACEMENT DETAILS

-
-
t N $Olit
38329
9
1 CENTERLINE
?
OW CIEDAY
7
' .
. 1919RKiR1
2RRG
3
t 26905
EL 16.
5 t
1
? CONTR0. NT
9
7 7 ] S. SEE SHEET C-512. YIID

-DETAILS
FOR EXIT DITCH TCx GRADING
2
ty 6 24
1 ,8 .
.
t

t t " ,. SEE R11EET STOW EROSION AND SE016ENT

CONTROL! FOR OR ITONE CHECK DAY DETAILS.
A17919Fi??i-

EXIT DIT
HaEN7ERLINE t /
?' •ti,i„ am

" 383297
E 2690,9

12

E ! N 38 3000 i?-

a_.?

`
533M x 3811
3832962 Z CSP-ARCH
M p' 1 y 3304 381
I
3B 71. 4 50-ARCH i {

E 2690,0.86 l
1
a6E 9.1
8 -
IMV EL 16.,
5 B
S33?91 38 LARCH 11 JJ/
"1 t tj
t t
,
S Z W a
E 26904126 1. 1 h4
c c Y V
INV EF 16. 3A1W
2 -ARCH W O Q
Z
62

1
„ ttt Ot
?
t Ji9e
tt` lyt i t"'tt1 S Q 0

l
;
,
I' a C3
F
A
T
= TR
? Tt
ii
,
k
T RVICE ROAD 9 a
{};
e,
H
FU
EES 1 S
e U
a
SIT 1 7 41\<<y 1S ` p J Z C1
NO
t a "
1 1tt,1?
t
H ry tl
?? / 0 20 40 W.
a 14100

C-145
D
6
A
1 1
2 ' 3 ' 4 ' 5
I `1 i
1 1 7 1 .S 1 Q 1 rt
E
1

EEL." N f

N 383700
c-u 1
C-1I -I4 -7I
C-14C-I4 C-I4 -1J -12
-726
-138 C-13 -1 -13
-12
C-13 -133C-13

... _. ? '
1 C-12
C-13 -13 C-12
!

_ _ _ ._ ._ ._ .?.. STONE CHECK DAN
' t CONTROL POINT
5 M
.
10
3
'3
'
' i?
1
....... _

EKIT8733 01137tH CENTERLINE
-- -N 7.A0 ?! 1
49
E
1
6
9
3
i EL 16.27
t

- SE E

?E

E 269690.5§
t t f }
EL, 16.18 t
}
_ S 53383 x 3 CSP-ARCH
N ]877303.60
.60

_.......... _. _, _.._ _ ._ "---`
l ? t 269491.20
tt TRY EL 16.19
- _ `
?x7B3DITCH 1 NTERLINE tS
.E 216. t
I~? C 76.16 16a t t 1 t
t it
tl t t NOTES,
/. SEE SHEET ROAD IOSIOEIIALK
SECTIONS. FOR FOR ROAD SECTIONS.

_
pp???
S N%SBSS7WH,CENTERLINE t t 1 1
^ t t S33M x 381N5 CSP-ARCH 2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT NNW

-
BB
t E 2664119.29 t N )83329 .91 t
1 o E 269691.11 1
\ N J83 00 EMPLACEMENT DETAILS. GnRgsT
a1FIF-
t t t + , 3. SHEET FOR 12. T MISCELLANEOUS
CEL GRADING.
DETAILS.
q"
"'
X ? 3
1 ,
? P
_ Y +
m. rl
HE uses 4. SEE SHEET C-S16. EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL. FOR STONE CHECK DAY DETAILS.
t t I
l S r w

t SIT
n
y/ (f
__
1 YY l \
y
\
•- r
U
Z
t 1 )
T,DICENTE NE

3
40!i' (j?\
'?.}? ?\ W
g ¢ W 6

a
Z3 W,
? n a

' f u

- o
v Z w
w a i
Z
- J

O N 3833200

' l

IL
¢

_ y
y

^t _ t
r
N `
Q a
2
u n
2

/ ?
N

a
1 Z
..
z0' K
u
'
i
8 8
b
0 20 so W.

C-146
D
C
B
A
1 1 2 1 3 1
4 ' 5
" 1 31
1 1 2 1 q 1 4
E
E

NEY ELW N
-11
1
N 383300
C-1? -1a C-H
C-14 C-1

-178
%
r

4 i

-

E j
li
ll
I
I
_._-16.0 ---""-----
- - •- - - - - NOTESt
t t. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS. _
` 2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIONARY INFANTRY
` TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
\\ A"t) PINE T!A'C'%'.
M M37300 EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.

\ ? ?-
t
t ?

p 2

p u
Ir =
\ ¦ rc ?
\ 8

C? w
7 J

>
A?IC} 110',

-tp

MvMM? a W

a

? > 2 ¢ 2
o U a
I /r ¢ w o
f N
m W
2
3833 Do p N ¢
a R
¢ z

- N e e rc
It
IT 171

s s
0 20 so GD,M
i .. .. !' 1:800

C-147
D
C
B
A
1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5
( 78 ) 3dnsoloN3
.4
C

E
F
1
B2D BATTLE SIGHT ZERO
f CENTERLINE
CSP CORRUGATED STEEL PIPE
E CASTING
EL ELEVATION
FFE FINISHED FLOW ELEVATION
M METER
W MILLIMETER
NIT MOVING IWANIRT TARGET EMPLACEMENT
M MOBTHIN.
M.T.S. NOT TO SCALE
PC POWER CENTER EMPLACEMENT
R RADIUS
SIT STATIONARY INFANTRY TARGET EMPLACEMENT
STA STATION
TYP. TYPICAL
C CUT
F FILL
C-142
C-1,311
i 3 i 4 i 5
LE MN
EXISTING NEW GENERAL NOTESt
IIOLLARD a 1. BLOCKS SHOW ON THIS SWEET REPRESENT THE SHEET MATRIX.

CABLE PEDESTAL yy
W 2. ALL CONTOUR INTERVALS SNOW AT 0.2SM.
3. SURVEY DATA OBTAINED BY U.S. ARMY ENGINEERING AND SUPPORT
CONCRETE MONUMENT A CENTER. HUNTSVILLE.
FIRE NYORART 4, A. HORIZONTAL SURVEY DATA OUTPUT IN UTM. NADB3. ZONE I6. METERS.
GUY WIRE -j S. VERTICAL SURVEY DATA OUTPUT IN %AVON. METERS.

POMEIIP0.E
0 6. SEE SWEET C-146 FOR CLEARING LIMITS.
T. ALL ELEVATIONS AND COOID(MATES ARE IN METERS UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN

SANITARY SEINER MANHOLE .
6. ALL SLOPES ARE TO BE GRADED TO 311 UNLESS OTHERWISE SH MN.
SIGN 4 9. DEMOLITION DEFINED ON SHEETS 0-125. C-126. AND C-131.
SOIL BORING
BATCH METER P? SURVEY CONTROL POINTS
BUILDING COINER r 0 PTO NORTNIN6 NYI CASTING (XT ELEVATION /ZI

CONCIE
7E PAD O.J10O 3632!92.231 271952.56E 22.142
CLJ200 3632899.062 271622.134 21.769
GRAVEL ROW
J116 3877071.326 272166.111 21.204
FENCE
MMUOB CONTOUR - -10.0 - - -I"-
MIUOB CONTOUR - - - - NOTESt
THEELINE -? t. ALL HATCHED AREAS AMC WETLAND AREAS.
C-146 METLDD AREAS 2. CLJ 100 AND CLJZOD ARE 3N'i DOED MASS SURVEY MIARRERS SET IN

` ROAD CENTERLINE G:r!/lF:?1l7lLrlL CONCRETE AND STAMPED CORPS OF ENGINEERS. YEAR 2005. WITH POINT
`
yam , SIT DESIGNATION.
a. J116 IS A UURTN CAROLINA GEODETIC SURVEY CONTROL MONUMENT.
_ MIT

OJ116

C-135
,. '`?., ZTt 32
?-
c-1 r
i
N
0
200 loo o 2a0 400
A a
'I D

?W
yH J
0 u
a
z
a rn
u Z?
C
3
I

1 2 3 4
5

E
t

SIT n $17 27
%
6EL216Y N
_ slr 14 \

- N 72]00
_ SIT
'lA -tt -1.
•..•. ., •w. ...w. ., w. .,». .,w. .. "3101 x ,W CSP-ARCM •r»• ••»• ,w. ., a.,. ,..

S]
]W %]61WCSP -
N 317Y1
79
67
•, • N 76]229
t61

'

\

-126
.
INY26!1694 EL t1?72 E 2696A7
\ IM EL 1 l
.73 ' / -171 C-17 -1] -17

.. aw. ••»• ••»
•
y
1
SIT
% 1 -+x
-17 -13
• w
..».
.'-MN RN 2;30 tSP.ypl ....
..». •. •••• \ C-1
EXIT DITCH NIEIL INE
- ?
: C-t7 -, C-1x9 '
M 7672256.6.
E 269631 03
.
IM EL 11.29 1
SIT 32 21
EL ,,
j SIT x. \ ? E

- , •
•• \.? 3t ?
? I 7 i

53

3M x MAIN CSF-ARCH
N 3832214."
D

SIT 23
i4a.
- ,7 w•
/ 533161 x 7e1M -ARCH NOTES,
j

j T Oli [E,IIE IME SIT 22 N 3872193.01
E 269621.15
IM EL 17.06
1. SEE SHEET Ci01. NOW AND SIDEWALK
SECTIONS
FOR R

M,
4
E
2
STONE CHECK DAY 1 CONTROL
0
F

a .
OAD SECTIONS.
_

L
I .70
M 363227
3
03 •• ••w• •
??_ rww.
• , •»•
..» 2. SEE SHEET Ci02. STATIDIYRT INFANTRY

E 269616.79 TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SI7
EMP

EL 17.79
- LACEMENT pETA1LS. .N?
! ]. SEE SHEET C-303. STATIONARY INFAKT6T
TARGET ?-

S1T 21 -
/ EMPLACEMENT. FOR DOUBLE SIT
EMPLACEMENT DETAI
EXIT ,TCH, CENTERLINE
2
9 -

as
E LS.
E 269710.41
EL ti. t5 160.
-
9423, .. SEE SHEET C-S12. YISCELLAIEOIB
OE7AIL5. FOR EXIT OITCN GRADI or,
----

l ,
06 NG. 66
-
/ 5. SEE SHEET C-SOS. PpIEpCENTER
E%li DITCH RLI -
E%I OIT6 \ +2 EMPLACEMENT. FOR P0IERCEMTER
N 3632120.47
E 269710.42 r t
J N 72167 .,
6
269
07
^ , EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
EL 17.10 76
7
JE
L
STONE CA OI1Y' 6. SEE SHEET C-012. Y15CEUAlEg15 DETAILS.
FOR TARGET SENYICE ROAD TURNAROUND
I
f N7/
M 21Sro
I -

•
LAYOUT.
E 9799. SIT T. SEE SHEET C-Slt. EROSION AND SEDIMENT
1T.1 IT DIT CE IME u.? CONTROL. FOR STONE CHECK DAY DETAILS.
76]2 1.62
_ - E 269 Y [

- - TAR SEMI RO 0

_ 36321STSOCE1 60 RL [HE
E
26E6s0.2/ yH
EL
y> a
?Y

- -
STONE
DAN
o
=
u _
a
3
N 17217
.is c
?
a
j te
[
O
E 269623. N
EL IT.10
N ]132100
?i
?•
aa
_ E ? u Q

PLART PINE EES N 6 !

0 20 90 oft :. w....
NeDO ...?,

1 2 3 0133
4 5 C
B

I
E
I
53388 Y 301 CSP-ARCM ?
N 3032320.7 _
E 2692 7. t9
W N TARMT SERVICE ROADS UX-M I N
ARV EL
S
Nr. .a...

TARGET SERVI
ROAD 70
•a?• •a... .a... 1
lfR - SIT -IA -1

OO
OM N 38327
EXIT OI TC
EXIT
L
S15.0 STOW CHECK DAM H CENTERLINE
" -14 -13 -14
COM7RLL HINT
N 3832276
1 E 269A82.11
.0
E 269372.23 EL 1T. 45 STONE CHECK DAY 'a"" C-14 C-14 C-14 -13 -12
EL 16.08 CONTROL POINT -126
N 3832284.72
58i
E
?
7. -138 C-13 -1 -13
TARGET SERVICE ROAD T 1
L
5 -ti
-t] -1

EXIT DITCH CENTERLINE

M 3/32260.29
C- C-12
t] -17 -12 i

6

573181 Y 38
MIN CY-RCM E 2694.29
)7ri
EL 77

-

h
N 3702.

)8 2
I
Y6
L41
S 2
2 EX i DITCH CENTERLINE
269244.
1
1 .
8p.
N
1
E ] E
0
EL 17.53 ?NTERLIM
N 36 D]2I2559 i
gE
9 16
426'405.12 i
1
MOIESa
- t. SEE SHEET Ci01. 110110 A1D SIDENAL6
SECTIONS. Fq1 ROAD SECTIONS.

2. SEE SHEET C-302. STATIONARY INFANTRr
TM%T EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
EMPLACEMENT DETAILS. M8111111":

M 383 Wmmwr
3. SEE SHEET C-512. III3CELLANIEOOS sR- ----
DETAILS. FOR EXIT OI TCH FAA01110.
///
/
f 4. SEE SHEET 0-312. NISCELLA1E0p5 DETAILS.
FOR TARGET SERVICE ROAD TURNAROLM
LATOOT. 1f884R1?1R-

I S. SEE SHEET C-SI EROSION AID SEOINENT
CONROL
FOR STp1E s Nr
j
f .
cxECX DAN DETAILS. i -
i r.Nr ?
?

? ? 6
C
W
D?
- J WW
L?
o L=u
? u
PLANT PINE TgEES Q
= I W
Z

N 38]21 N
0

a Q y
?
8 7C
f ?? g

8 8
8
8
n N . .
0 20 40 60.
::
1+800 ..
? ? ., C -134
I 7 0
- :J

533W N
36/Y0 CSP-ARCH ?AM N
.. .. a... •c M.

a ..». N
36325!4.99
E 26975. .16
\ SIT S9 IMN EL 17.59 6
-14 -14
SIT S6 PLANTEC 116E TREES
•aM. sM 1 w. .M. -14 -14 -14

% 3
533161 N
N 38325H
SIT ST 1,
MIN CSP-NKN
"
C-14 C-14 C-14 -13 -T
2
2269749.
E
1 INN EL 17 2
60 -126
-136 C-13 -13
-1J -13 -1
A 1 C 1
\ C-I3 -13 -12 I
SIT SS t

1 a §l

1 i i
a.... .. aM. aM. [.n. [... ».
1
N NOTES,

1 1. SEE SHEET C-501. No AND SIDEVIALK
.<..«_ ...... •<u. •e M. ? .. M. .. un. .a.a. _ ? SEti1dK. FOR ROAD sections.
a 2.
SEE SHEET
S ATIONARY INFANTRY
C-M.
1 _ TA
RGET EMPLACE
N
. FOR SIT
E/PLACEIEN7
DETAILS.
CSP-AR
r 533M
0 l
' T
S
S. SEE SHEET C -'-

. .. q?.
.11.3672.22
?
'EF N Dv9a? ,
i 24
ATIONARY INFANTRY
TARG ET EOPLACEIEN
T.
FOq
OMWE SI7 Y
?
EIPLACE
IEN7 DETAILS.

H
-? 4. SEE SHEET C-312. NIMLANEDUS DETAILS.
FOR TARGET SERVICE RDAp T
--

533M N 361016 CSP-ARCM URNAROM
LAYOUT. 6r
-
N 3632441.92
•. u.. .e u• E 2y 74M.60 .uw. - ,
.a... .ev

N,
S. SEE SHEET C-SO4. MOVING INFANTRY TARGET _
i.?
INV EL 17.57 / _
i
% - EOPLACEWENT. FOR =I
INFANTRY
TARGET EY
?Sl
' , RACEYENT DETAILS.
?Jt r
.au • .[ A •[M. ....r.
_

. :1
S
N 3932400 z w
:. -1 yI
IT\36
N 2632370.47
rV EL
+167

\
MIT 1 T
V
SI7 30 ? o
PlAr+iEO o NE TREES

IT
I7 3S /!
..
a». .[..SIT 26..»., ..».
...«. .;
0 20 40 60w
leoo

r.-ins
D
C
B
A
I r- 13 14 a
1 l :i 4 5
i
I
73
E
f?
• ??
®SE i??
C
iNRN"'IYIIN??
YR??
R1R1?Y r
.L .<.
?L r r
i .? ?.
E E
3
_ WW J t§W
•N Z
Y?
/
1O u a
N o
yml
a ? 7b
u
E '. ? aa5
t
.-Sty 4x- `\au. i •t IANGET SERVICE ROAD i Y a /
A ... f
533M [ !!1W CSP-ARCH / g
C- 136
t 2 3 4 5

PLaN,EO PINE TREES
SIT 72
?
a .esl?.l• .err. .a...
•r .e•o .<u. / .<.a. .a w. aw. ...+. ...
w. u
e
. . / . .
.
. a..w.
-12

- SIT U - - ? 2 ? -,Jt C

.<•.. ...r. .e•«.
.<...
.<ar. / aaw.
SIT 71
•..,.. <,•.
.<w. .a u. .a u. <u.
•i kx
SIT 70 C-13 -13 C-1

/•r. •au. .<u. .e.w. .ar.. .e•r. .. / /.w. -AA.
e..r. .<w.
.su. .a v. e..r.
•
! /? 517 S

aw ,?
' SiT p Sli Sl
N J!J NOIESa

?
- -
MIT 2 ? 517 52 t. SEE SHEET Ci01.
ROAD
AMD
SIIIElALR
/ ?
SEC
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD
.....
SIT u .au. ..u. .e•.. .<... i n.
•? ..w

SIT iT <... .<w. .•w. .a.../• .<.... •. w.
/ i t ••,+• 2. SEE SHEET C-S02. STAi IOlW7 INFANTRY
TARGET EIPLACEYENT. FOR Sit
EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.

? 3. SEE SHEET C-505- PdIERCEN7ER

.. ••.
..w.
.tw. .a u. s ..per
.s.o-.
.e a
.<u. .e. L
.w. .. u.
.e ••' EMPLACEMENT. FOR PD[ERCEN7ER
EMPLACEMENT OE7All5
.
SEE SHEET C

s .
-512. YISCELLAIEQIS DETAILS.
FOR MANEUVER TRAIL CUL-pE-SAC LA7WT.
/
S. SEE SHEET C-504. Y071/W INFANTRY TARGET
.a.a. .e u. •e.+. .a u. .a u.
•s .<•w. .<u. .au .r. u.
51T 42.,.. .a.... •e.w. •e.... EMPL
IMG
KANTRY
FOR MOV
T
' I`
EIPLACEYE ?
T
ARGE
/ sli a slr s

i /
SIT .r

...... .a SIT 62 'e... .<.«. .<
CSI .a u. ' .a u. SILtS? ? ? .e .. .<,r. .. w. ......
Ml7?!]2]..%K I
?-
E 2il.%.3.
? INY EL 77.57

SIT 6,
'
SIT 42 PLANTED PINE TREES

7??
J
1 `` /
°
E 29?l
l
?
.a...
IMY EE'1T..! .. r.. .sr.. .a .s u. .ta.. .awN. .e <• ..
n p
20 40 60.
alow
1600
1 2 3 4 5

i
/
E ?{NE 'I E PIME rsaEES -lA -tA
- ' A
% w. -1N -1t -lt
SIT 16 I /
517 91

/

C-1 C-+? C-1? -t3 -12
-120
• -u -t3 -1
\
1;4 -
ll
a
1
?
?
N 3& NOTES.
2 / SIT 93
/
/ 1. SEE SHEET C-301. ROAD AND SIOEUALR
CT
S
...n. -. u. .. u. %.... ..u. St .Dti - - t ....
tu. %u. .<... au.
• - .tu. ..u. .a
1 0
Y
t E
IONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
SIT 111 1 /
2 2. A
T 0-502. STATIOmARY INFANTRY
f ? ARGET E
T. FOR SIT

1 SIT 92

y EM
PLACEMENT DETAILS.

a
SEE SHEET Ci12
MI
SIT 110 - .
.
SCELLANEOUS DETAILS.
FOR TINGE f SERA ICE MW T
R
...w. ..... .<u. .s.w. ...... . tu.
<u.
.. w. .. u. U
NAROUND
LAYOUT.

'
-
SIT 91 ?
SIT 90 SIT 01

..
N. • .[a«. law. .ea...
'? . \
, / < Z?
- \
1
\
'
1 Z

N 3032400
! 'I w
-'
W

- .!; ...w. ..... / .... .u.. to u a

T00 u = N
?1 m

u g
, N yy
11
Q
II ¢
t7
. \ ••••• .. u. ?TAROET SERVICE RMO 9t Z
8 1 j ?

.a... ...?. .<... _?? o ao w Rom
sEm

_ C - 137
A
T 7 '] A
E

_ ' %.. 6LL6W N

T 1

-126
SIT / C-,] -, -1]

` IC-13 -13 -1 -L LJ = i
SIT 1 C-12 F
C-,l -17 C-12

.n .., a.... _ ..Ot -
-
N ]612300
NOTES.

1. SEE SWEET C-501. N01D AIO SIOEV1l6
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
l •, .w.
2. SEE SWEET C-S02. STATIOMRT IMFAITRT
_ TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
- EMPLACEMENT DETAILS. ARM-.
- - - ]
SEE SHEET C
S
.
-
2. YISCEILAlE07A DETAILS.
FOR TARGET SERVICE ROAD TIINIIAROUND

_ LAT011T.
RRfE1i?R-
-
ANTE INE T S

- g

.W 4
3
N ]6]2.00

t G
i U
0
=
W
{
y p0
- ? N m 6
-
a J
a 6 y
yp
r
Q
L
Y ?
O
U
? W
6 g

8 8
_
«
0 20 .0 6Gn
u600

__ C-13A
D
C
B
A
D
C
B
A
I C 1 1 q 1 cJ
, 9 1 3 1 4 1 5
_ t
t

C-14 C-14 C-/. -,
-IM
-lie C-13 -1 -13
.. _12
T -u -u -,

oil
g 1

NOTESs
•

'
I
.
. SEE SHEET C-SOt. Sp 40 SIOERALR
-
ExtT
/ 1 T61.
i OL'
3032
SECTIONS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.

_
. 2"75 . 2. SEE SHEET C-302. STATIONARY INFANTRY
f
EL 1.29
TARGET EIMPLACE,ENT. FOR SIT
SI " EIPLACEIEMT DETAILS. lIINIR--AIR?F7r-
u •, a.. „aa..
STORE CHECK Om 3. SEE SHEET C-312. MISCELLAMOUS
DETAILS. FOR EXIT DITCH CRAOING. 6AF -

NN 213
3324.97
.• SEE SHEET C-5,2. NISCELLAEOUS DETAILS.
IR761E=Wlr
1
.93
26
E FOR MANEUVER 7NA IL CIIL-DE-SAC LAYOUT.
----
.... ...r. ,s
L
6
...r. ..u. ...w. S. SEE SHEET C-5,2. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.
FOR TARGET SERVICE ROAD 111RMAROL11O
...... .
517 N LAYOUT. i ?..
EXIT DITCH CENTERLINE
N 3632705.36 6. SEE SHEET C-516. EROSION AND SEDINES.
CONTROL. FOR STORE CHECK DAM DETAILS. r
SS]W N 311 CSP-ARCM.
.Kie3MTT.eR...
u E M9732.43
i•.. .....EL 17.36
?
E M9709.37
IMY EL ,7..0
N 3632700
f
L
i
I
M
W
'
1
f " w Q? W
J

' CSP-NIL71
S3
>W
'
r /? SIT T9 y
3
e???
1
2,
5(- .u
70t
"?3 '<u. •sw+. o a
.
69
INV EL 17.41
" SIT 76 ? = O
/
/" ZZ i N oZ
...w. .I / .u. .-S I 7TH su. •s.a. .Far O
C
u

SIT 76 .REES 6
2
\
SIT 75 ? TARGET SERVICE ROAD 5

8
r 8
\`
• Qg
'
"
.
e
...... SIT.ier. ...r. .n
w • H .?..r. su
s
.°•
? \ . N 0 20 40 earn
/ N 3832600 '4W rI.w

1139
D

E

C
B
A
1 I ? I 3 Y a
1 2 3 4 5
1
1
SIT 138 SIT 139 - a - . UXAM N
SIT 13?
m - -tA -, -tt
Sir 1 -12
_ IT f0T C
-1K
106 -,A C-13 -1 -13
SIT 134 - - f - C-12
1832 • ?? ??
------------
SIT 172 - SIT
.. SIT 137 .w .... %?/' v. .. • . .. .. •. - S
SIT 177 IT IO / Is
1. SEE SHEE
m5 T C-SOI. ROAD AM SIOENnL[ C
• /••• " •• ?y SEC710ns. FOR am SECTIONS.
_ .'T 1W 2. SEE SHEET C-M. STATIOYRT IKUITNT
• A • TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
K 7 ' 517 02 EMPLACEMENT DETAILS. y--?
f f M21 . - ' , ... f a. .r a / r - • ///srJ ru S. SEE NOLSHEET C-SOS. EOEERCENTER
'SIT 125." EMPLACEMENT DETTAAIIP?RCENTER ACEME I. 4. SEE SMIEET C-W. MOVING INFANTRY TARGET
SIT 1211 EMPLACEMENT. FOR MOVING INFANTRY ??-
/ TARGET EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
T 1 4 #. /'
5 ` ? O i?.Y.
..... ..... S11 /' ..... SIT.w BY N 3/72700 ?i
=
tri
i
1E Z W
J
? SIT / t m
...v. .... SIT 10..... ..... .. .. tI >
u N °
u STK yym11 pp
i a
IT ] t o
1 u C
/ SIT as
ED PINE TREES u ..o. ,e ea.. .... Maw. ..w. eu. s.. a w N Q
•• •••w• •• w a y/ TARGET SERVICE ROAD f
A / SIT 91 ...«. ...,. ..... ..... N ,. ...w. ....,. i / <... .<.. <... .<.,. .... .... ... ? 0 20 u EoH
N >0]tS00 y000
C-140
1 2 3 4 5 ---"-
i 1 7 1 1 d c
E
t
¦r. w .. N

1T ,

-,7E E-13 -1] --,3

PUNTED PIPE TREES
-'' C-12
C-13 -1] C-12 t
••' ? ??
' M 717 ?

/ NOTES,

• .? 1. SEE SHEET C-S01. ROW TIO SIDEWALK
? SECTIONS. FOR ROW SECTIONS.
2. SEE SHEET C-S02. ST.TIDNAtT IWANTRT
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT

• ••
f }TI,
?• EMPLACE ENT DETAILS.

3
SEE SHEET

-
- .
C-S12. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS.
Tai 7AOET SERVICE IOW TURNADUND Wr
LAYOUT.
IE1{t?'?yr
i -•

' N 3532

/
?
•
'517, ?
? i ?
? ?
? _ _
` N O
1E
S, / J O ?(N
2

-• _
a IT 1 N
e? g
3
_ L
8 p
S - +9

' 0 20 a 60R
]Ea HM

C-142
D
C
B
P
1 2 3 4 5 ------

c
t G ;3 4

-
E DIT ERMINE STONE CHECK DAM
N CONTROL 4POINT

E 269564.75 ,
. w •
on. ' ?___________ t
+••' F';<. IT DITCH CEMTERLINE .'
3833115.96

i W C5P-ARCM 6 45.55
- ° ' ' • '

.•.n. "-E 351 .u /
T ...•. / e
-
NIT DITCH CENTERLINE ---'
+-----+--_-------- _____- _.__-__
. ___-'
-'
1 'i..
s 3033,08.95
65
16.
16.65

'
/
SIT 7S! 1
_
/? ./? ;36104 CSP-ARCH
? ' N
?I
?
/ IN
E
i
? 1

n.
•u.
j sa.
-
.ean.

.a
an• STORE CHECK DAM

__________________
- _ - - _ ------- + 1 CONTROL POINT
-*-M33037
86
,
-
E 261607./6
N EL MIS _
SIT 13
6
_

'
? .a,.:.c _ jNNE BECK DAN
~

.. u. .. aw.
...w. ..
w?
/
..SLL1 56
.. 3652!59
.....
z6luo.sN? -

SIT t
.. u. ..... .. u. . SMAK v.?= T -.... .ar. .. 5701
- - E 21
EL
e
E1
u
/
/' SIT 7 $3304 s 36104 CSP-AQM

• . .... .. M, N MST
...n.

---------------
E t61K2
S
IMP EL 16.96
GS

~
t
r
?i Sh 139

1 2 3
5
E
f
.., mm N
3 -1
-1 K
-1]
-12 t
_1
C-12
13 -1 -12

- - - -- -------

NOTES,
_ 1. SEE SWEET C-SDI . ROAD AND SIDEWALK

• SECTIONS. FO1 ROAD SECTIONS.
2. SEE SHEET C-M. STATIONARY INFANTRY
w
TARGET EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
EMPLACEMENT DETAILS. -
-- ---- 3. SEE SWEET C-S72. MISCELLANEONS
- - DETAILS. FOR EXIT DITCH GRINDING.
-- -_-=-- ______ 4. SEE SHEET C-516. EROSION AND SEDIMENT NI7116161

CONTROL. FOR STONE CHECK DAN DETAILS. 1?T• NT
-i?
N 3635000 -
iww) -
?
- i?w•v

J W
g
q

= ¢ O

nRLIK P, "TED PINE TREES FiZ N
Z ¢Q
p 0 OZZ
Q
j
CSIP-ARCH

M 3.52!00 C 4 a
r
0 20 60 Gam
elroo
NEW
I 9 1 3 1 4 F
D
C
E
i
1

/ s
/?
ttL[Lr N

'
T 171, °
- a.
. " T ...n /.. .r a.r.
T ...r. ...«. •"r• _178 C-1] -1 -1] -i26
, N 3833100 -ti

?
J C-12
C-t] -13 -1
f
i r r .r..n.... .......n_ ?

10
?3%

,?
.». .... ....
..... .... ..n_ i i

s

.l Sir
.•
I
»• •••••• •.w. •..••
•'••• .•••• •• No7ES1
I 11161 /__ 1. SEE SHEET C501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK
. 1
..
0
.
/ - SECt10NS. FOR ROAD SECTIONS.
I 0 2• SEE SHEET C-SO2. STATIONARY IWANTRy mw
TARGET EIPLACElEN1. Fpi SIT
I „ y,
• ?a ..r. ..... .e.Y. .< ..y' .r. .e... EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
'
f / 3 EAP
A
- ?-
I 7
I CENEMT
L
FOR POWERCEN7ER
EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
I I I
\ .M - 0
0 - ..u. ..w. . ... .. ...r. ..u• ...».
-

.. .r . . • •r • I • r . .n
S T 137 ? ?
__4_M_

.r.n• /? .r.r. ..... .. w. .. wr. .. PLA THE PG -ry•
Y
1?!
PC ?

SIT /S8 1 _ p

...w IT ICY U. .... .. r.
/
7 .. wr. .. w.
- =

t W
/? _
1 + -
J
IL
.
...._ ...?. ..... ..
..... ... ..... ..... ..... ......
i e
7 scRrlc
"AD e

it 155 _ SIT tJe o 20 w eon.
taco

C-144
D
C
B
A
1 1 2 1 4 S
1 - `
I

%t7 war N
1

1
c-74 c-14 c-14
-u
_u
-126
i PLANTED PINE R EES -M38 C-17
N 3833100 -12 I
C-12 f
C-13 -1 -1

Nxl 393 M77?86N7ERLI1IE \ NOiE51 r
E 1.78 1. SEE SHEET C-501. ROAD AND SIDEWALK `
EL 15 , SECTIONS. FOR ROD SECTIONS.
1 . • / 2. SEE SHEET 0302. STATIONARY INFANTRY
TAROEi EMPLACEMENT. FOR SIT
Mx!l72ITC CENTERLINE DAM
EMPLACEMENT DETAILS.
Tr-
E 26!05]. 7 COI M NT 3. SEE SHEET C-512. NISCELLYEODS eN
EL 76.IS \ 231 6 272

16.46 7

* • DETAILS. FOR EXIT DITCH
CMIN6.
A. SEE SHEET C-516. EROSION AND SEDIMENT

It76T6tt?fKt?
I CONTROL. FOR STONE CHECK DAN DETAILS.

EXIT 017
CENTERLINE r.L.
•/ .. µ.. NNE
N 383297
E 269041 W
12
N 38
Occ j-?-
j-.r•

337181 % 351 CSP-ARCM 33M Se
1 -ARCH S
N 76]2!62.2 t6! 9
`
E 269040.
IN! EL 16.E . NP.!
- ••...•
y1
S 1 Y
t?
\ ¢
W
53, K 36 ARM
M M , W
N 3872!52.
INN ELIIs. M

.
Tw

t
92
-ARCR•?• J LQ?
- O D.
2
Y '
26 z
c _ Q
u
1 .42 =
O
_ {
.raw. .ew... Z
Q
- " 1
TARGET RVICE ROAD 9 LL Ig
U
PLANfED PINE TREES ` ` F
!
tl
SIT. Mw... ?
M

n ti 1 0 20 b 60Nn 'w
4600

C-145
G

I
N 30353133.00 CENTERLINE
E 2691!0.!6
EL 16.16
N
EXIT DITCH 3833316 CENTERLINE
N .01
E 269.19.11
EL 16.76
...}.. - ..?• SIT L?I..
I f
st +n
3 4 5
t
t
IM as N
N 3633400 _,. 1111 _,.. D
c-,] -13 c-,x 6
CIEs OM
11011

.30
CONTROL
CONTROL 6POINT
N 36]]]06.]0 I

EL2SI6 2111 .13

3E !9

?f
'
533M : 301M CSP-ARCH
N 3633]03.60
E 269191.26
ANY EL 16.19
NOTES,
1. SEE SHEET C-SO1. NOW AND SIOENAL6
SECTIONS. FOR HOMO SECTIONS.
_ 2. SEE SHEET C-502. STATIO NNY IWANTRT
S33M N 301M CSP-ARCM
- TARGET EHPLACENENT. FOR SIT
ENPLACEMM DETAILS.
-
-
N 36332!1.!1
E 269191.17 N 363 yIIIIN
-??
S. SEE SHEET C-012. MISCELLANEOUS
DETAILS. FOR EXIT DITCH GRADING.
pi kj Q PYE EES 1.
SEE
C-514- EROS AND SE T
T
ICK
I
E
FO
CO
NTROL.
R STORE CNE
OAR DETA
LS
I

' - - .
- CE E
' T
3Ei 4
d
M
9.
S =
1c
1 ° J
. W
,e g
c?
d
y> ? 3
_
? 2 u

W
M ]p]200

6 pp
? ? Z
4u g

R 0 20 40 60.
low

C-146
3 4 5 '""--
a

1 2 3
4 5

E
e E
VAR- 4572 33S3 4572
61
PROPOSED
..
- GENERAL NOTES:
PROFILE
ORADE i
i s 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

uJU 0.1255 0.1255 3wz
? 2. FILTER FABRIC AND GEOGRIO SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF COMPACTED FILL.

p
?
„w t
E

EXISTING
GROIiND FILTER FABRIC COVERED WITH GEOGR IO ISEE GENERAL NOTE 27 E%ISTING
NOTE:
3G5 COMPACTED FILL IYINI GROUND
1. FOR LIMITS OF
CLEARING SEET SHEET C-148.
305 AGGREGATE SURFACE COURSE
TS.
CLEAR I NO L IMI
ACCESS ROAD

N.T.S. vAR1ES VARIES
E

off
?
E
EEE
;84

L FINISHED
l- 0.2505 /"'GRADE
_ VARIES 7 VAR IES /

1 FINISHED \ ? -l ILTER FABRIC COVEREO WITH GEOGRID ISEE GENERA
N
T C
GRADE O
L
E 27
\\
305 COMPACTED FILL (MINI
0.2505 0.2505 °
? FINISHED `
152 AGGREGATE SURFACE COURSE
? GRADE

7 TARGET SERVICE ROA D AND MANEUVER TRAI
1FINISHED FILTER FABRIC COVERED WITH GEOGRID (SEE GENERAL NOTE 21
GRADE 305 COMPACTED FILL (MIN) N. T.S.
305 AGGREGATE SURFACE COURSE
NOTES:
' VARIES

1. LANE WIDTHS ARE 3353mm FOR SERVICE ROAD 1. °' (YIN. JJSJ)

2. WHERE SERVICE ROAD i WIDENS AT PARKING AREA. ¢?o
- PROPOSED
PROFILE

CROSS-SLOPE OF 0.2505 SHALL EXTEND ACROSS <?z
PARKING AREA FROM ROAD CENTER
GRAD' =FW
_
., LINE. PARKING AREA
PAVEMENT STRUCTURE IS SAYE AS SERVILE ROAD
u w SEE NOTE 1 0
725
s

PAVEMENT STRUCTURE. ?_ .
5

e
s
__ J
w s
1
SERVICE ROAD EXISTING
s
nF?ceTE p -

e
} N
T
S u
COURSE }; > Z B

- .
.
.
NOTES: GROUND F

4
U7
Z
' 1
. BLADE EXISTING AGGREGATE SURFACE FILTER FABRIC COVERED WITH GEOGRIO (SEE GENERAL NOTE 21
Z 1L °

T CI
O ATT11N REQUIRED CROSS-SLOPE OF 0.1251 305
FILL (MIN)
*RA E 2. FOR LIYI TS OF CLEARING SEE SHEET C-148. 305 AGGREGATE SURFACE COURSE yM J W
{ CLEARING LIMITS. Y w ML y
N
CC ROAD
UPGRADE ..
° Z E
x u >t

.;

S?

.2505

.2505
-?

INISHED

x. T.S.
^
F
a
3: w
y a
3
Wo
?? -Y ':? 3• F GRADE m
W N

%
- - E O 2

?
- GRADE
GRADE 1219 7 K G
FIN ILTER FABRIC COVERED
WITH GEOGRID (SEE GENERAL NOTE 21
I SHED d
U °
Q

GRADE JOS COMPACTED FILL IYINI
? ..,
r U7
R
305 AGGREGATE SURFACE COARSE tl 6 m _

A 102 AGGREGATE = C
152 COMPACTED SURFACE COURSE y

FILL (YIN .1

F
O
E

i A
WWIITH GEOGRID
C
V
RED
I
SEE GENERAL NOTE 21 tl
BUILDING ACCESS ROAD
M.T.S. S I DEWALK
N.T.S.
.2WA
1 C-501
2 3
4
5 ^_
ENCLOSURE (?
C

E
F
e- 1 1 4 i 5
DIRECTION OF
GENERAL NOTES:
FIRE -
SEE SXEET C-001 AND C-802 1. CONCRETE SHALL DEVELOP A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE
FOR TOP O BERM ¦IDTXS STRENGTH OF 28 WO IN 20 DAYS.
2. EMPLACEMENTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF REINFORCED
RAILROAD CONCRETE: CONCRETE STRUCTURES SHALL BE PRECAST
SLOPE 27C TIE 1CONTRd. POINT
102 25 ITYPI
L102 OR CAST-IN-0L ACE.
x
x 12
7 100 457 J. AREAS DISTURBED By CONSTRUCTION ACTIV171ES SH ALL BE
L BE
.
1
STEEL ANGLE REVEGETATED OR RESURFACED CONSISTENT ¦ITX INE L
TURAL
-
(SEE NOTE
5 SURROUNDINGS- GROUND COVER SHALL NOT REDUCE TARGET
152 FILL SLOPE 3:1 VISIBILITY.
COMPACTED P
FI FINISHED A. PLACE TREATED RAILROAD TIES AGAINST CONCRETE HALL ON
LL' 752 GRADE L102 X 102 X 12.7 X 100 STEEL ANGLES SPACED A MAXIMUM
/752 (MINI OF 000 ON CENTER. ATTACH ANGLE TO CONCRETE MAIL WITH

SLOE 2 CONCRETE ANCHORS.
FILTER FABRIC
I(SEE GENERAL NOTE 6) (MIN .I
CAPILLARY MATER BARRIER 5- ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
R1 RE 300 O.C. E.N.
(CENTERED IN WALL AND SLAB) FILTER FABRIC COVERED WITH GEOGAID (SEE GENERAL NOTE 6) 6. FILTER FABRIC AND GEOGRID SHALL EXTENO TO LIMITS OF
CAP ILLART LATER BARRIER AND COMPACTED FILL.
SECTION A
N.T.S. C-5 2 C-502
_---- ---- ----?--_,
A
C 2 C-502

CONTROL
POINT A 1

1
SHE
S
SEE E SHEETS C-801 AND
FOR COORDINATES AND ELEVA7 lEVA7I0N 1772
F ? .LSZ
M
RAIL OAD TIE CONTROL POINT B
is; b - 50 AND
C
DI
I
T

1
127 F
NATE S
AN
D ELEVA
ION
OOOOR

\
\
SEE SHEETS
C-001 AND C-802
\ ELECTNICAL FOR TOP OF BERM WIDTHS
\ BLOCKOIT /
\ 781 X i6 7YP. /

/ V \

SINGLE STATIONARY INFANTRY TARG ET (SIT) E MPLACEMENT
M.T.S.
1 2 a
? p
e
p[8
7 e
?: 3s 4pg-
984
C
_J? as
U W I
Z >_
e !• ? 1aJ
4 ¢ Z
? ] J
a
gN V J F
Y> W
£ V
? U
S N 2
J N 0) Q
O
a ¢ a z
a o
u ?
Q
b 8 O
F Z ¢
F a a
a
i 2 Z d G
E
i
DIRECTION OF GENERAL NOTES:
FIRE
SEE SHEET C-801 AND C-802 1. CONCRETE SMALL DEVELOP A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE
FOR TOP OF BERN ¦IDTMS STRENGTH OF 28 Wa IN 28 DAYS. r
1.
2. EMPLACEMENTS SMALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF REINFORCED
A LROAO
1
CONTRO
POINT CONCRETE: CONCRETE STRUCTURES SMALL BE PRECAST
1
L
SLOPE 2i
, 2 25 ITYPI OR CAST-IN-PLACE.
L102 102
457 3. AREA DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SMALL BE
12 7 •
x 100 1 REIIEGETATEO OR RESURFACED CONSISTENT WITH THE NATURAL
E
STEEL ANGLE SURRg1NDINGS. GROUND COVER SHALL BE REDUCE TARGET
1 SEE NOTE 5 / t52
' FILL SLOPE 7:1 VISIBILITY.
COMPACTED iP FINISHED A. PLACE TREATED RAILROAD TIES AGAINST CONCRETE BALL ON
FILL' 152 CRAOE L 102 x 102 x 12.7 x 100 STEEL ANGLES SPACED A MAXIgp OF
/152 (MIN 9 O CENTER. ATTACH ANGLE TO CONCRETE WALL WITH

C00 ONCRN ETE ANCHORS.
F:
F
t52 SLOPE 2"
FILTER FABRIC (MIN.)
ISEE GENERAL NOTE 61 CAPILLART WATER BARRIER
S. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
- 7

111
3
a1
REBAR • 300 O.C.E.K. FILTER FABRIC COVERED WITH GEOGRIO /SEE GENERAL NOTE 67.
' 6. FILTER FABRIC ANO GEOGRIO SMALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF i
T
(CENTERED IN WALL AND SLAB) CAPILLARY WATER BARRIER AND COMPACTED FILL. C
SECTION A
N.T.S. Ci 3C-503
(
l
--- --
?---- --- ---- --- ---- ---- o -- ---- --- - --- ---- ----
---
A A aM? iTRRAMT
C-5 3C-503
o Ci 30-503
??

TOE OF BERM // ? i ?=

1 s
CONTROL POINT A
CONTROL POINT A 1 1772 1 SEE SHEETS C-B01 AN
D 0 -802
SEE SHEETS C-801 AND C-802 F '1 1372 1
`
FOR COORDINATES AND E
AILROAD TIE LEVATION
FOR COORDINATES AND ELEVATION f
T
A
'

52 50
. IE
IL
CONTROL POINT 8
SO SEE SHEETS C-801 AND C-002
15
i
127
FOR COOIDINATES AND ELEVATION
1
Z
O
ITNOL
PoI
M 27
R
W
S
E
C-801 AND C-802
EE S
R I ' y) Z
Y
\ FOR COORDINATES AND ELEVATION
SEE SHEETS C-601 AND C-802 w
2 W U
\
TRR
AL FOR TOP OF EERY WIDTHS ¢ j LL
? ELECTRICAL
T
B
O
KO BlOCK011T
/ g
2
Z
\
L
C
U SB1 X 76 TYP.
/ Z
w
? 381 X 76 TYP. I W
,N ? J H

?
//
-
Y> Z Z R7
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
?? - - -
/ ? S U Q
u a
\ /
\ N K
\
L g /
L 0 \ J U) O7 a

- t S a
5
It v ?
!
8000 AT SON TARGETS 8 8 J 2 O
10000 AT t00M TARGETS - G E w
= i r
(n
tl
!

DOUBLE STATIONARY INFANTRY TARGET (SIT) EMPLACE MENT
N.T.S.

C-503
D
C
B
P
B
A

t

D TO'..
-- - --------------- ------- ------------- ------------ -,
- -
'
D
G eo°?"DR B
Y
- ?
\ COORONATES MO ELEV.
N
ELECTRICAL BLOCI(OUT RAILROAD
SEE DETAIL 1) TE ITYPI 2m _
152L
I f [
zm C
C
pp
NN
N
EEE
S
$E
?B?p22
• ll97
ELEV
COOROINATES
'
Q4

1\ . LS
.5
6152 ROD ITYPI
S
?
- X
- 3II.005m
PLAN
N.T.S
8
C- MOVING INFANTRY TARGET EMPLACEMENT
C C
N.T.S.
NOTE: SEE SHEET C-802 FOR GENERAL NOTES:
RAILROAD TE TOP OF BERM WIDTH. 1
CONTROL PONT CONCRETE SHALL DEVELOP A MWAN COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF
28 MPa N 2B DAYS.
OREC
710N
25 (TYP)
? ODE 2y,
FNE
M OF 2' EMPLACEMENTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF REINFORCED CONCRETE:
3
-11 CONCRETE STRUCTURES SHALL BE PRECAST OR CAST-IN-PLACE-
FILL SLOPE 660 L102
f `C01H'KTED .10 X 3. AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE
12.7 .104)
REVEGETATED OR RES
RFA
ED CON
ISTENT W
T
T
T '-?
3.1 152 I
H
U
C
S
HE NA
URAL
i54 FILL- STEEL ANGLE
SURRONgNGS
GROUND COVER SHALL NOT REDUCE TARGET
.
w
MN)
X .
(SEE NOTE 5)
VISIBILITY .
?
GRADE
TO .
152 FINSHE0 -
DRAIN
_ - 152 (MN) GRADE PLACE TREATED RAILROAD TES AGAINST CONCRETE WALL ON
L102 X X12 X 12.7MM X MOW STEEL ANISES SPACED A
SLOPE 27 (MN) FILTER FABRIC MAXIMUM OF 900MM ON CENTER. ATTACH ANGLE TO
CAPILLARY WATER BMtRER (SEE GENERAL NOTE 7) CONCRETE WALL WITH CONCRETE ANCHORS.

FLTER FABRIC
COVERED
WITH CEOCRID
5. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE
3 REBAR • 300 O.C. E.W.
NOTE 71 •/
(SEE GENERA
INDICATED.
(CENTERED N WALL AND SLAB) U

B

THE EMPLACEMENT MAY BE REVERSED OR MIRRORED FROM WHAT
6

Z

B
B
.
SECTION 15 SHOWN HERE
N ANY CASE
THE PROTECTED END OF THE Y N W
.
,
N.T.S. C- - EMPLACEMENT IS ALWAYS NEARER TO THE FNNC PONT AND THE E
V t
Y •
I
Q = X:
W
V
ELECTRICAL BLOCKOUT IS ON THE PROTECTED END. ¢ 0
7. FILTER FABRIC AND GEOGRID SHALL EXTEND TO LMTS OF 0O j W a
a57 CAPILLARY WATER BARRIER AND COMPACTED FILL.
0 76
Q
T I y
y j

to O J
W M
E
x u w

w
o
3 1381 I 51D 381 I .?.. i N r
FINISHED ^'COIPK7ED
I
I
LL
GRADE
u ELECTRICAL a N m
TE
R
FILTER FABRIC u BLOCKOUT ???lll r O Z
CONCRETE WALL X I C
- c. o =
SECTION DETAIL 1 Y W i
N.T.S. c- 0{ C-
ELECTRICAL BLOCKOUT DETAIL
=
? Q o
A N.T.S. f Z A
B

I

C-504
C

1 c ? -*
t
t
GENERAL RTES:
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. FILTER FABRIC YO GEOCRID SHALL EXTEND 10 LIMITS OF COMPACTED FILL.
' DIRECTION 2000 7. FILTER FABRIC WALL EMIR) TO LIMITS OF CAP ILLAM WATER BARRIER. D
OF FIRE
CONTROL POINT
TOP OF TIMBER rLLL
2Z
305

3 152A 1676
?1 EXTEND WALL TO A POINT
305 ABOVE FINISHED GRADE
f SLOPE 2% a
L
rr COFACTEO FIL
SLOPE 2 FILTER FA99"SEE
GENERAL NOTE
TIMBER WALL
)SEE SHEET S-504 .
lY1X.1 152 YIN. CAPILLARY WATER BARRIER FINISHED GRADE ()
FOR RETAINING FILTE0. FABRIC COVERED WITH GEOGRIO ISEE GENERAL NOTE 21 p ti
WALL DETAILS) CONCRETE PAD )SEE NOTE 31 tPP ff Ey
3L t6`
COMPUTED FILL
H-PILE SU'POR

SECTIO
F
N. T.S.C-505 Ci05
F'
C
NOTES:
4 1. CONCRETE SHALL DEVELOP A NINIUL COMPRESSIVE
STRENGTH OF 28 WA IN 28 DAYS.
2. SEE SHEET E-506 FOR CONCRETE PAD LOCATIONS.
3. DESIGN OF, CONCRETE PAD IS THE RESPONSIBILITY
OF THE CONTRACTOR.
POWERCENTER
EMPLACEMENT
N.T.S.
T ? Z d Fi
Q Z E
Q ? W
8 w z
L o z I w
'y O J u
Y? z i
%O U u W
V O:
z N W
J N 2
O
O W
a 2 a ¢
ca o s
u O
Y F w o
E ? E

C

t
1700 1600 2550 2500 1650
DIRECTION
OF FIRE
(DOWNRANGE)
a.- uQZ ¢.
A. N ,. r WR $_bl1
W W Wn u
TYPICAL FIRING LANE POSITION AYO T
N. T. S
3 I 4 I 5
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. FILTER FABRIC AND GEOGRIO SHALL EXTEND 70 LIMITS OF COMPACTED FILL.
3. SEE SHEETS C-507 AND C-508 FOR FIRING POS17IO S DETAILS.
51-- 00y e- SEE SHEET C-518 FOR RAILROAD TIE STEP DETAILS.
OX
tf-- -11
FABRIC FILTER COVERED FINSHEO
WITH GEOGRIO (SEE GENERAL NOTE 2) GRADE
NORTH/SOUTH CENTERLINE FIRING BERM SECTION
N. T. S
SERVICE ROAD 8
TOP OF DITCH
SERVICE ROAD 8
TOP OF DITCH -1 3
SERVICE ROAD 8
TOP OF DITCH
N 3832113.20
E 269903.07 /
EL 20.40
JEA-T/WESTENTERLINE OF
FIRING BERM
II
FABRIC FILTER COVERED - "-FINIS
WITH GEOGRID tSEE GENERAL NOTE 2) EAST/WEST CENTERLINE FIRING BERM SECTION cRAOE
N.T.S C0IPAL TEO FILL
N 3832120.26 l
E 269910.16 I
EL 20.80
1 LANE 1
1 .. .Q
A (TTP.)-
.)
B ITT"
C (TTP,)-
D
1
DMtECTIONNORTH/5011TH

1
I
3
OF FEW
CENTERLINE OF
:1 ,
1
N 3832127.3 1 (DOWNRANGE/ FIRING BERN N 3832162.57 1

nl E 269917.25

EL 20.80
E 269952.69

j
:i EL 20.80 a

3:1 ?I
ul
3:1 ?

N 383214
81
N 3872155.52 N 3832t69.63 3:1 pl
?I
°j

I N 3872138.36
E 269928.38 1.

E 269931.82

38J218B.47 E 269985.60 E 269959.78

EL 20.80 EL 20.80

W
a1
W
Ni EL 20.80 EL 20. ?0 E 269938.51 Nj
i EL 20.80 1
ANI? LANE 3 LANE 8 LA 1
9
f
N M
I I

3:t 1
I
1
3:1

CENTER OF

7:1 i

j
j RAILROAD TIE j
i i
i
i i

3:1
i
3:1
TWICAL FIRING LANE
STEPS TIE 3:1 I
1

I RAILROAD TIE
STEPS CENTER OF
RAILROAD TIE (SEE NOTE 41 j
(SEE NOTE 81
F I TTP.) PL AN A - ROOF TOP FIRING POSITION
B - STANDING FIRING POSTION-
N.T.S C -WALK-N FIGHTING FIRING POSITION
E ETTP.) D - PROF FIRING POSITION
FIRING BE RM WIN
DOW//B I
FR
F
APER
TURE FIRING POSITION
F
E
N
RT
_
N.T.5
2 3 4
® i
N 3632176.68 SERVICE ROAD 8 w
i
° w
W
DITCH
TOP - -
+ -

3632183T8 u
z
E 269973.96
EL 20.80
z
z
C7

U
O
Z 2
_ U
_
__________
^ 2, U
z
0

r r w
8 8 j
£
LAW 5 LANE 6 LANE 7 LAME 8

E
E

500
200
GENERAL NOTES- Le
RAILROAD TES ? ~~ I. CONCRETE SHALL DEVELOP A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH L
TYP. OF 29 APO IN 28 DAYS.
2. ALL REINFORCING STEEL SMALL BE PER ASTY A61S. GRADE 60.
/D00 RAILROAD TES
TTP.
3. AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SMALL BE
REVEGETATEO OR RESURFACED CONS157ENT WITH THE NATURAL
SURROUNDINGS. GROUND COVER SHALL NOT REDUCE TARGET
•16M REBAR VISIBILITY.
N. ALL WOOD FRAMING SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED. ALL WOOD
SOO CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MME WITH HOT-DIPPED GALVANIZED NAILS. ! F,
250
FRNC POSITION S. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7FS?
osp
3=
4
500 200 i
RAIL AD TES
TYP.
FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW PLAN 600 OLk
o
N.T.S. N.T.S. N.T.S.
I '
0

KNEELING FIRING POSITION
(F) a
T
N.
.S.
W
MOOD POLE MT FIRING
MT

20DO
•f
CONCRETE
? -

OD
PLAN ¢ Z I
SOs100
wow

N.T.S.
i d
n
BRACING 600
g

00

3
? ??A?V /inV??

•

po
2 w
7
w
50a1DO ? j IJ J O
wo00
o BRACING
FRNG P.SITICN y >
# O w a
C a
FRRON
FRNG CONCRETE 1000 I Q V O
o T u z w °
19 PLYWOOD 3 N m Z

AD NOTES- aJ O
L W
BRACNG
' 1. Y000 POLE SHALL BE TREATED WITH p j 0 4
: PRESERVATIVE TREATMENT.
•
• d O

E

I
I Id 150

•
• t • • •
•
• •• •
F1N5N1E0 GRAD I
I
I
? Y F- w

300 BOO ---?11so1?
---
uD{? e a D

200K.LOK s w

C Nu BLOCK SIDE VIEW ( .f z
FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW PLAN N
T
S

N.T.S.
N.T.S.

N.T.S. .
.
.

WINDOW/ BUNKER APERTURE FIRING POSITION ( ) STANDING FIRING POSITION (B)

N.T.S. ??

N.T.S. _
W2M
_ C-5 a7
C
DIRECTION
SLOPE 2X (MIN)
•N
1450
BENT DOWEL o
ITYP)
150
150
150
E.w.
LL WALLS AND SLAB)
FIBM(` POSITION
FRONT FRINf
POSITION
2100
3
A?A?LA
'
AfiAyA
AVV

4 -
150
a LSO
1420

`. "AGGREGATE
,Nt A WALK \ Po
J0 0
AGGREGATE
FILLER
ORAN BLOCKOUT
PJ
150
(4) •19 %. 450
BENT DOWEL
a 300 O.C. (TYP)
(3) •19 X 450
RENT DOWEL
• 500 D.C.(TYPI
l ? I
PLAN
N.T.S.
A
WALK-IN FIGHTING FIRING POSITION (C)
N.T.S.
t 7
PLAN
N.T.S.
4
GENERAL NOTESt
L CONCRETE SHALL DEVELOP A kW M" CONPRESNE STRENGTH
OF 29 NPO N 28 DAYS.
2. WALK-M FIGHTING POSITIONS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF REINFORCED Cf
CONCRETE: CONCRETE STRUCTURES SHALL BE PRE-CAST OR
CAST-IN-PLACE-
3. ALL REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE PER ASTN A615. GRADE 60.
4. AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTMTIE SHALL BE
REVEGETATED OR RESURFACED CONSISTENT WITH THE NATURAL
SURROUNDINGS. GROUND COVER SHALL NOT REDUCE TARGET
VISIBILITY.
5. ALL WOOD FRAIl1G SHAH BE PRESSURE TREATED. ALL W000 E
CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE WITH HOT-DIPPED GALVANIZED NAILS. e
6. ALL OINENSKNNS ARE M LLIIETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
7. FILTER FABRIC SHALL EXTEND TO LYTS OF CAPILLARY WATER 1F
BARRIER.
-? 3t sa4
AND BAGS
C
SOD
300
IIRI
NOTE: SKID SHILL BE
POLYPROPYL WIT. A UV
MNIBITEA, w
SIDE VIEW - -
y a
N.T.S.
500 -
WOOD
BRACING
2100- W-4
20OX400%100 SIDE VIEW FRONT VIEW
CPI BLOCK N.T.S. N.T.S.
ROOF TOP FIRING POSITION (A)
N.T.S.
4
PLAN
N.T.S.
PRONE FIRING POSITION (D)
N.T.S.
5
I Y w E
2
$ ? w
Is z
Is
O W Z
,N
w 0.
Y>
I U N
U Q O
s W a
In
j In co
Z
a
ir a.
:) ir
i a °u
! 1- w
n a ? Z
I< ? ?
tl f
1 2

6990
IOQ 700 30DO 2840
1730
TOP
OF WALL
COARSE
AGGREGATE
3 FILLER
(I- •t9 % 450
BENT DOWEL <TYPI
SLOPE 2X ORNN BLOCKOUT
150 p•

1
•13 e
ROPE 2X
AGGREGATE ILENi
(MWL)
WALK
yy AABBNRICC
157:E QNERAL NOTE 7) CAPLLMY WATER BARRIER
SECTION
C
N.
T.S. C- _506
C ORECTDN
OF FIRE
C-5 512 (DOWNRANGE)

150 2500
21 _ 200 I _I
LSO
I COARSE
Y
2
4 5
E
t
GENERAL NOTEt
1. ALL 016ENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
,2- SEE SHEET E-509 FOR RANGE LIMIT MARKER POWER AND LIGHT
' FIXTURE MOUNTING DETAIL. 8
r
i L
' 3- LOCATION OF LIMIT MARKERS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BY BASE RANGE
SAFTEY OFFICER.

p[?QQ
1 ®
51 220
51 3 f

r
-1
191M EXTERIOR PLYWOOD El
d
RED AND BLACK STRIPES
STRIPES SHALL ANGLE
DOWN TOWARDS THE
RANGE

7_

O
_
752
T-

305
5 -
RANGE T -
102' X 1 2W
TREAYED WOOD POSTS
W i "

_ 2
I
Q W
{7:
ld
z
Q
..
o
' 0:
8
L 1L•
Ul V W Y
Y> _ o

ELE
VATION VIEW SIDE VIEW f
V
r
V
RANGE LIMIT MARKER w W
N.T.S. j 0 m W
Q G
a 0 ?
Y H W
e a ? z
- >
NOTE: z
I
1. DIAGONAL STRIPES ON LIMIT MARKER SHALL ANGLE DOWN TOWARDS THE RANGE. N

2. LOCATION OF LIMIT MARKERS (A) TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BY BASE RANGE SAFTEY OFFICER.

C-
D
B
3 1 4 1 5
1
C
C
E
4 i 5
GENERAL NOTE:
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. -
1 2134
127 DIA. STEEL PIP
19 x 127 Pit
PADLOCKS
St
®
25E
ROAD SURFACE C ROADWAY
22 DIA HOLE IN
10 MOLE F
2 PADLOCKS
NOTE: ALL EXPOSED STEEL TO PI PE AND PLATE
BE PRIMED AND PAINTED.
LOCK DETAIL
N.T.S.
SECURITY BARRIER ELEVATION
N. T. S.
STRENGWO105LT•HIGH
NOTE: ALL EXPOSED STEEL TO
RE PRIMED AND PAINTED. / 10 ?7¢? CX STANDARD X
25 SPACER AN1LON G 7 x 9.8
4152 DIA.
STEEL PIPE 5 DIA. STEEL PIPE
165 OIA. x 13 THICK PLATE 5Z 5 JF4
WELD TO PIPE 27 CIA. HOLE STECLAFIPE
12T DIA.
STEEL PIPE
152 DIA. 127 DIA.
STEEL PIPE STEEL PIPE
5 111 A.
STEEL PIPE
27 DIA. HOLE
THRU 60TH PLATES
165 CIA. X 13 THICK PLATE ESTEELAPIPE MrW x IJ
WELD 70 PIPE 17-DIA. FFENER WELD
S EEL PIPE ND P ATE
25 CIA X 51 HIGH 52 WI E X 305 LONG % t7 T FOR BOLT HEAD) THI CK STEEL PLATE
52 DIA. STEEL
GATE POST
r

BASE
SECURITY BARRIER DETAILS
N.T.S.
2

e

Z
3 -
W E
6
2 z
Z
O
N O J W
Z E Ir
O U U O1
Z N ~
J in m 7
O u
a z a w
UI
a o
• U
H W
V z
a
F
3
7.315M TOTAL WIDTH
- 3658 _
?w
152 CIA
STEEL PIPE L
T-
457
GGF
POST FOUNDATION
N. T. S.

D
(

C 9-GAGE TE WIRES
(O.NI O.C. MAX.)
F
TOP OR BRACE RAIL TACHMENT
N.rs.
EI
S
STEEI

B TE WKRE
(0.4Y O.C. MAX. AID (0.4 Y?0 C. MAX. AND
WI7NN O.imY FROM WITMN O.I-M' FROM
TOP AND BOTTOM TOP AND BOTTOM
OF FABRIC) OF FABRIC)
(-BEAN ROUND POST
LINE POST ATTACHMENTS
N.T.S.
O.3M
MOLDED E%OIHERMIO WELD
OR APPROVED CLAMP-TYPE
FITTING OF COPPER (TYP)
NOTES:
Z - L TIE •a AWC CONDUCi(XR
CL FENNCCE PosT DTIE THE
TENSION WIRE.
2. FOR GATES USE A •6
BRAIDED COPPER GROUND
STRAP TO CONNECT CATE
TO GROUNDED FENCE POST
GRO UNDING DETAIL
N.T.S.
d? o
3 I 4 I 5
1.93Y
SINGLE LATE LEAF VERTICAL BARBED
TO (IM OUTRIGGER WIRE APRON
TO UNSECURE SIDE 3 STF Q
3 STRANDS OF BARBED W TOP RAIL (TYPI
BARBED WIRE
WFIIE
WIRE
BRACE RAIL (TY 1
LATCH
Z GATE POST MALE RAIL (T P)
w (TYPI
i`
.1 TENSION
TRUSS
(TYP1
?ADE HOG RINGS (TYP.) BOTTOM ENSIOI
111 111 I WIRE (TYP)
FLEXIBLE 111 I 1111
GROUND STRAP 1 11 I I II I AGE LW
IUI IUI
L _I L
OST
SPACED PERSONNEL GATE
ELEVATION
N.T.S.
TENSION BAND TENSION BAND
(OAM O.C. MAX. AND WITHIN O.1M
BRIC a FABRIC)
`? MIS FROM i0P AND FABOTTOM
FABRIC
TENSION Slit TENS . WIRIRE
H_BEAM TRU55 BOLT
(9.5 MN. DIA)
IN)IAID °OST ENGAGE ACH FOABRIC LN(
BRACE RAIL CLAMP DETAILS END OR GATE POST DETAIL TENSION BAND DETAIL
N.T.S. FASTENING DETAILS
N.T.S.
GENERAL NOTES:
,-ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. DETAILS SHOWN ARE TO CLARIFY REQUIREMENTS AND ARE NOT
INTENDED TO LIMIT OTHER TYPES OF FENCE SECTIONS AND METNO
OF INSTALLATION.
3. WIRE TIRES. RAILS. POSTS. AND BRACES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED
ON THE SECURE SIDE OF THE FENCE ALIGNMENT. CHAIN-LINK
e FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED OR THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE SECURE
AREA.
O 4.FENCE SHALL HAVE EXTENSION ARMS EXTENDED OUTWARD
FROM THE AREA BEING PROTECTED.
5.C-SECTION POSTS SHALL BE INSTALLED SO THAT THE VOID
INSIDE THE POST IS COMPLETELY FILLED WITH CONCRETE UP
TO THE TOP OF THE FOINOAT ION.
STANDARD HINGE A? TCH 6.SWING GATE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH PADLOCK AND
ASSEMBLY LATCH ASSEMBLY.
N.T.S. N.Y.S. ?.GATE FRAME SHALL BE A MINIMUM 48 MILLIMETER NOMINAL
I ROUND) OR 50 MILLIMETER NOMINAL (SQUARE). GATE FRAME
SHALL BE OF WELDED CONSTRUCTION OR SHALL BE ASSEMBLED
T TR WELDED
45• 7RUSS ROD
LOCH PIN (r.0.5PL.A.N. BALD WIRE )TYP.)
(935 AIM. D
9.5 PLAN PIN RIVETED FLUSH (TYP)TYP.)
CONCRETE BASE
LINE POST CORNER POST
A
EXTENSION ARM DETAILS
N.T.S.
TRUSS ROD AND BAND
N.7-1
1 1 2 I 3
STEEL POST SCHEDULE
USE AND SECTION MINIMUM OUTSIDE
OWEgSON5 (NOMINAL)
CORIER.END L PULL POSTS 73 O.D.
TUBULAR - ROUND 63 SQUARE
TUBULAR - SQUARE 89 X 89
C-SECTION (ROLL FORMED)
LIE POSTS
O.D.
so
TUBULAR . ROOD 57 X 43
N- SECTION 57 X 43
C-SECTION (ROLL FORMED)
TOP L BRACE RAMS 42 0.0.
TUBULAR - ROUD
TABULAR - SNARE 35 O.D.

H-SECTION 41X b

C-SECTIDN (ROLL FORMED) 41 X 32
4
USING HEAVY FITTINGS. A CON ACTOR'S OPTION A HORIZONTAL BRACE NAY BE USED IN LIEU OF TRUSS ROOS TO
BRACE MELDED GATE FRAME. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROPER RIGID CONSTRUCTION OF GATE
SUPPLIED.
GATE POST SCHEDULE
CATE LEAF WIDTH OUTSIDE DIMENSION
(NOMINAL) (NOMINAL)
,.83M
73 GO
63 SO
NOTE)
BOND MG FLEXIBLE GROUND STRAP
TD GATE POST AND GATE BY MOLDED
EXOTHERMIC WELD OR APPROVED
CLAP-TYPE FITTING OF COPPER.
5
f- I
f
®39
! U
Z
w .
4 ¢ j
Z w
o Z
N 0 J U
W i z
w
o - ¢
S U ]!
U ? Z
F Z N J
J O TO Z
a j If u
a o
U
r w
E j z
z ¢
E
D
C
B
A
CHAIN-LINK SECURITY FENCE DETAIL
N.T.S.

C
[?

1829 tTYP.I m

GENERAL NOTES: 1
I
•
D
305 ITYPI
OZ SLOPE
FINISHED FINISH FLOOR
ELEVATION IFFEI
EXISTING EXISTING
GROUND GROUND
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
GRADE 0.2SOi / 162 2-FILTER FABRIC AND GEOGRID SHALL EXTEND TO L IMITS OF C-ACTED FILL•
5
- -
1L J1
- ?
3
COMPACTED FILL ]
NOTE: ELEVATION OF FINISHED GRADE AT INTERFACE
WITH BUILDING EXTERIOR. SHALL BE 152 BELOW FFE• EXIT D ITCH !7
A
3

N.T.S.
ODE OP ROAD
e
C
1
99
l
I l?
al
1
R . 20Y
I
R 20M
GRADING AT BUILDING EXTERIOR
I
N. T. S. I
9 ,f
,LO'
R?iY NT19.1
I
Z ' I
la j
E
^
J Tt. 1TOt•
I
1
TYNZr SEBVitE 1
-
?
St. T1W ?JL i P
MAINTAIN .255 SLOPE TO EITHER
SIDE 6 ROAD CENTERLINE CENT ERPOINT
OF CUL-OE-SAC

102.8293•
7.J2W I y ??a._
P it Js _w_
al ?_ra
TARGET SERVICE ROAD TURNAROUND ?I
?
M.L.S. iL
? 9
°
3 ti
a? >
z
Q j Y u
z L:

E 7
'
U1
R- 20M I R a 20M : 0 7 w J
I iN O J F
4 EOM OF lK)M) Y. Z i O
.
VARIES VARIES U U
MANEUVER TRAIL CUL-DE-SAC f N Z
¢ N m a
J
G K U
d
K N
H 1% a_ U E

3
3 Y
bb 8 L

A d
FILTER FABRIC 305 COMPACTED FILL IYINI
COVEREO WITH GEOGRID
,SEE GENERAL NOTE 21
EXISTING
GROUND
NDING AND BIVOUAC AREA
E
C
M
DVA
LA
N.T.S.
.s
C 512

1 2 3 4 5
E
E
f BIVOUAC AREA
I
1 GENERAL NOTE: ,
I
1 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. D
3.05M 10.9734
1 3.658M 5.658M 3.658M
I
SINGLE j SHEAVE CAST
ALUMINUM STATIONARY 127 OMA ALUMINUM BALL
C
B
A
TRUCK (SEE NOTE)
n STROBE LIGHT f
CONTRACTION JOINT (TYP.)
(SEE SHEET 5-301 FOR DETAIL)
IDO
e!
SWIVEL Q3s E43E
SNAPS it1
76 MN. TOP DIA
•10 BRAIDED
POLYPROPYLENE C
HALYARD
5 MALL THICKNESS
ALUMINUM Ft E
PLAN :27152REINFOORCED CONCRETE PAD
H3 0 300 O.C. E.W. AT N.T•S. o
63 BELOW TOP OF SL'
tt?
I tr. 230 EAST ..
i ALUMINA CLEAT -
i FINISHED GRADE INISNED GRADE -? ?' -
i -
152 CAPILLARY WATER BARRIER SECTION FILTER FABRIC (SEE NOTE 1)
N.T.S. NOTE:
6
1. FILTER FABRIC SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF CAPILLARY _ 750 ALUMINUM
WATER BARRIER. ION. FLASH COLLAR 9 LJ B
BIVOUAC PAD v z
CAULKING COMPOUND w l7
NTS v 2 w
SEE PLANS FOR LENGTH 14,`L L o
OF CULVERT EXTENSION 4 HARDWOOD CENTERING WEDGES . C ? J Q
_N
EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE BLACK ASPHALTUM PANT ON 'j w a W
SURFACE OF POLE AND SLEEVE _i' •••• 2 Q o
ASSEMBLY BELOW GRADE TAMPED NO DRY SCREENED SAID II o
_ _ 16 GA GALVIWZED CORRUGATED STEEL TUBE { U U 0
130 MIN. BUTT DIAL ;t;{;• +: ' { WELDED STEEL WEDGES S w w
WELDED a w a a,
__.__._ STEEL PLATE 2 N Z
_ _ 150 r'=. :r•:. NE13 TTHIN N
-- - ---------------------------•-- ------IDN OF FLOW .___.w? - J O D] J
w
^^/?________________________19 DUl s 600 COPPER Q
L: :.................... 13 THICK STEEL SUPPORT PLATE
---------------- --
CLAD GROUND SPKE tt ? ?
CLEAN OUT DEBRIS FROM INLET/ WELDED TO BOTH PLATES CONCRETE I D. U E
NOTES: IS ppE b 6 j z
4 EXRTENGTOSPEN JOINTS?NpS . AS REUIRED TO ELIMINATE {? L Z
2. PPE .MATERIAL OF NEW TO MATCH PPE MATERIAL OF 6DD 11N ? A
E NOTE: LOCATE TRUCK ON NORTH SIDE OF FLAGPOLE !1
E1(5T GE PIPE EXTENSION TO MATCH SLOPE OF WITH STROBE LIGHT 160 DEGREES FROM TRUCK. a
CULVERT PIPE EXTENSION FLAGPOLE
N.T.S. N.T.S.
.1?
C-513
1 2 3 4 5 ?,?_
1 1 2
as
3
1
1 t

FINSNEO
COMPACTED GRADE GEOGR ID
F
ILL
(SEE GENERAL
NOTE 71
SECTION
N.T.S. C-5 sG-511
GENERAL NOTES:
t CONCRETE SMALL DEVELOP A MINIMUM COMPRESIVE STRENGTH
OF 29 MPa IN 28 DAYS.
2. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
TOP OF 3. GEOGRID SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF COMPACTED FILL.
0 BERM
D

C
B
A
111- I ?II?? ISJA?? I 5? i? I 1 1 1
1 1
Il 2 ? 1
? 7 I I4 5' I 17 8 1 1 1
I 1 I 1 IB 9 7 I
I 1 1 1 1 t 1 9 I
1 1 I 1 I I I 1 i 701
t I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1
1 7 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1
1 1 I 1 I I i I I I I
?t 7 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 7 I
1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I
it t t 1 1 I 1 1 1 I t
gl 1 1 I 1 I I
I I I I TYMET 6mY ITtf.1 I 1 I 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
? L
Wi zci ?? 4y 4D ? 85 6?? B, 8?1 log
zD
1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1
I 1 t 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 7
1 I I I I 1 I 1 1 7 I
1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 I 1 I I 1- 1 1 1 7 I
1 1. M 1 t 1 I I I 1 1
I I I I 7 I 1 1 1 1 1
I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 .
BZO
N.T.S.
152
152
162 PVC BZO TARGET OW
HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINT FINISH GRADE
GO X 100 HOOD POST
FOR PANELS /BY OTHERS(
COKRET
752 PVC
PLAN VIEW SIDE VIEW
N.T.S. N.T.S.
TARGET BOOTS
N.T.S.
1
2
4 i 5
TARGET
BOOT NDR11WNC EASING
JA 3532,8:.3. 25BK#.45
1B 35a107.i1 28583157
2A 383218187 20683188
2B 3632181.4 MOM 31
2C 360088.46 2064286
2D 387280127 20647.46
3A 353274.06 280637.33
36 7532705.n 208638.75
4A 3872105.32 280639.n
4B 3672107.10 2606/1.19
4C 38]20X!.15 260164
.D 3531o93.tM 28546.11
SA 35/2107.06 28847.27
58 ET2106./2 788434
BA 35327DI, 10644.06
TARGET
BODY NORTHNG EASTNG
06 3=100.75 2006N.06
BC 3832066.06 18556,.52
8D 3532006.56 20655325
7A 360110.31 200617.06
75 3=11155 25045.52
BA 350111.4 20640.53
05 3=112.41 285060.98
5G 31.41006.48 2580.55.70
8D 3532000.23 20865N.13
9A 36011296 25805197
06 353217374 280657.40
I. 3572114.29 20WAAI
106 360115.07 280655.4
IOC 7X/2101.12 25056198
100 30.72101.00 189887.01
BZO TARGET BOOT LOCATION
:::MDR
•'- RAILROAD TIE
•. STEP SECTION
FIRING LINE
1716 DEFORMED STEEL
REINFORCED BAR
(SPACED 670MM)
RAILROAO TIES
1152 x 204 x 24391
RAILROAD TIE STEP SECTION DETAIL (PLAN)
N.T.S.
116 DEFORMED STEEL
REINFORCED BAR
RAILROAD TIES
( 152 x 204 2439)
RAILROAD TIE STEPS (SIDE VIEW)
N.T.S.
ROTES:
t STEPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF TREATED RAILROAD TIES
AND SECURED WITH Nth DEFORMED STEEL REINFORCING BARS
DRIVEN VERTICALLY THROUGHT FIELD-DRILLED HOLES.
THE BARS SMALL HAVE A MINIMU LENGTH OF 46OW AND
SHALL BE LOCATED ON A 6,014 SPACING.
2. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE EXTEND THE FULL LENGTH OF STEPS.
3 4
5
11 D
- h
r
FUJI d1j,
C
Z B
W
a Z
T Z ' J
O
Z f O
O = u N
U Q . O
N Z
a
J O 03 J
2 d U
o N
a o
u f
ate?
=za
t ? A
C

1 95
190 A{
MARINE PLYWOOD
OW CHARACTER
r
LINE WIDTH
1,
O
SR 1
L
I von 1
20
CON
FINISHED
TARGET BOOT
I SEE NOTE 4)
SINGLE RANGE LANE MARKER
N.T.S.
aI
A4 METER LANE MARKERS
LAME PARKER TYPE CONTROL POINT A CONTROL POINTS CONTROLPONTC
MOONING IASINf9 NORTHING. EASTNC NORHNC FASTING
844 LANE MARKER 1 SINGLE 3e324M..76 269171.59 ]612131.85 20917213
NOW LANE MARKER 1.2 DOUBLE 3832401.59 26024.42 3832402& MEMO 3=40.69 288205.86
BONA LANE MARKER 24 DOUBLE 3=5450 72 299211.52 3832551.61 28 1220 3832552.83 2892@.87
SOON LANE MA DER 34 DOUBLE 3832807.55 200 42 367248.51 289791.16 38.72069.47 284283.91
NOM LANE INKIER 4-5 DOUBLE 3832961.57 269326.00 3612932.49 789327.78 472963.42 789378.58
SOMA LANE MRIWR 56 DOUBLE 3832712.77 296175.13 383271313 2BW75.99 38=4.49 269376.85
NIOPI LAME MARINER 97 DOABLE 3102110 31 28426.05 7672/61.12 26912891 3837181.93 289127.69
WONT UK MANGER 76 DONNE 383294.74 26911010 383290547 2810116 383280810 2690211
84M LANE MANBIERes DDIteIE 361745.51 78951730 3&RW 19 25MIM32 367780.87 286519.33
Z tAIE MARAER L10 OOlIB1E 36VDB7.M 269516.81 3812987.69 269697.87 3832883.TO
29839693
e00M LANE BARKER 10 SINGLE 3832914.30 269676.16 ]677914.65 RANGE MARKER LOCATION
1 7

ACE
POINT 8
`1 1 J
NOTES:
1• MARK ODD MIMBERED LANES WITH BLACK NUMERALS ON A UNITE
BACKGROUND. MARK EVEN NUMBERED LANES WITH WHITE NUMERALS
ON BLACK BACKGROUND.
2.INSTALL EACH MARKER USING 2-1000 x IOOW TREATED W000
POSTS. PLACE POSTS IN 152MM DIA. PVC PIPE TARGET BOOTS'
INSERTED INTO THE GROUND. FOR ADJACENT LOCATED
MARKERS. DOUBLE MARKERS USING A SINGLE SHEET OF
PLYM000 WITH 1 HOOD POSTS SHALL BE USED.
3. BOTTOM OF MARKER 9140 ABOVE GROUND.
4. SEE SIHEET C-514. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS. FOR TARGET BOOT
DETA.
5. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
FINISHED
CUNT
CONTROL POINT
DOUBLE RANGE LANE MARKER
N.T.S.
244
ISM14 A-C
MARINE PLYWOOD
OW CHARACTER
LIME WIDTH
50
A
r?
`.J
IIIIIPI?
DACE all ??FF
POINT C
W U
_ Z
W
6
z ' N
J
O
UM V J ¢
r
2 Z O
O 2 U N
u Q O
z N Z
2
¢ N In J
J O J
¢ ¢ d U
5 O N
u 7C
r w
9 ?
= a
s
AM METER LANE MARKERS
LANE MARKER TYPE CONTROL PONTA CONTROL POMB CONONOL PONTC
NORIIING EAS7NG NOR71fIG EASING IIORiMI1O EASING
400M LANE MARKER 1 SINGLE 3532271.10 20537.35 3832MA7 24537.97
400M LANE MAONER ld DOUBLE 3617293.16 269572.41 363224.29 2MM.4 39322%.25 269550.65
LOAM LANE M1RICER 24 DOUBLE 76]2336.31 2OZ7905 3632969.31 209579.76 363231030 298560.16
400M LANE MARKER 34 DOUBLE 38=70.26 26969299 3837371M 2MM73 3632372.16 26%446
400M LANE MARKER K DOABLE 38324M 03
288826.77
3632101.76
28029.56
3672102.69
299870.36
40CM LAME MANNER 56 DOUBLE U324M 00 269656.35 383243D.86 269957.21 367217132 799996.06
1004 LANE R &7 DOUBLE 367215731 29IN1538 36:8156.12 290017 3673156.92 2999117.18
1004 LAME MARKER 7d DOUBLE 3632M7.06 269718.02 763248J.72 719717.4 36321M.51 299717.98
LOAM UNE MARKER 6d DOUBLE ]0.77SM.N 2697411 36177307.59 2987N.12 3n850DI1 269750.13
1004 UNE MARKER>f0 DOUBLE 3637506.31 201 320 367254.92 26974.6 381750751 290785.32
144 LAZE MARKER 10 SINGLE 3832549.05 2061641 393249.4 299617.49
1 z
3

NOTES:
t. SEE PLANS FOR LO'ATIp15 OF STONE CHECK DAMS AND
COOROfNATES AND ELEVATION OF CONTROL POINT.
CONTROL POINT ELEVATION REPRESENTS THE MINIMUM
ELEVATION OF STORE ACROSS FULL WIDTH OF DITCH. [ STONE CHECK DAM
TOP STONE
CONTROL POINT
(SEE NOTE 71 1 DITCH BOTTOM
D 2. USE CLASS I OR CLASS 8 STONE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOUND IN ARTICLE 1W2-1 OF THE
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2 2
11 2 1 1
3. FILTER FABRIC SHALL EXTEND TO LIMITS OF PLACED STONE.
FILTER FABRIC (SEE NOTE 31
SECTION M
N.T.S.
° f DITCH
457 MIN. o
(TYP.I
1
l
C.
- 1?
j EROSI CONTROL STONE
NT
j (SEE OO OOTE
T
TOP OF ST1CONTROL PO
-_? ISEE NOTE 1 )
C FILTER FABRIC (SEE NOTE 3)
STONE CHECK DAM
M.T.S.
4 I 5
GENERAL NOTE:
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
GROUND LINE
OR WOOD POST
ABRIC
FILTER FABRIC SKIRT
SECTION p
N.T.S. C 1v - A
B
A
1
4.01a1ItUL.I IUN tNIRANC / XTT
N.T.S.
NOTES:
1. THICKNESS OF CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT SMALL BE A MINIMUM OF 152W.
2. SEE SHEET G-002. VICINITY AND SITE LOCATION MPS. FOR LOCATION OF
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.
2
NOTES:
1. FOR SILT FENCE SPECIFICATIONS, CONSTRUCTION. AM10 MAINTENANCE
REFER 70 SECTION 8.G2 OF THE CURRENT NORTX CAROLINA EROSION AND
EROSION MENT AND SEDCONTROL PLIMENT ANNING CONTRA!" NOTESDESIGN MANUAL AND SHEET C-515.
.
2. SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED AT THE LIMITS OF CLEARING
(SEE SHEET C-148, CLEARING LIMITS).
3 4 5
?S? tq3
ELEVATION
SILT FENCE
N.T.S.
HOBBS, UPCHURCH&ASSOCIATES, P. L.
North Carolina Div. of Water Quality ,
Date: 3/14/2006
Tran # Invoice Type Date Reference Balance
32708 031406 Invoice 03/14/06 P-034 Multi Purpose machine ; $475.00
Check Number:
Check Amt:
Discount
$0.00
50906
50906
$475.00
Pay Amount
$475.00
c