HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0084662_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20181107ROY COOPED
Govwnw
MICHAEL S. REGAN
54hT ary
LINDA CULPEPPER
lrrrerfrn &'rea w
Mr. Greg Simpson, Sr
Textron, Inc.
40 Westminster St.
Providence, RI 02903
Dear Mr. Simpson:
Project Manager
NORTH CAROLINA
Errirrr "Fh#1trdf Qrtarrry
November 07, 2018
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Former Homelite/John Deer
NPDES Permit #NC0084662
Groundwater Remediation
Gaston County, NC
The MRO would like to extend its thanks to Mr. Jon Wakeman for taking the time to provide assistance during the
October 17, 2018, inspection. Enclosed you will find the report for the compliance inspection. The treatment and
disposal system appears to be performing within the permit requirements.
During the site visit, mention was made regarding the potential of rebound studies being conducted at older release
sites. As stipulated in the permit in Part 3 Other Requirements, Section D. Facility Closure Requirements, please
notify the DWR regional office if you plan system shut -down activity.
The report should be self-explanatory. Should you have any questions regarding this report, feel free to contact
Edward Watson at edward.watson(a)ncdner.gov, or by telephone at 704-235-2198.
Sincerely,
DocuSigned by:
And
r'ew . ner, P.G., Assistant Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Resources
Attachment: Compliance Inspection Report
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 I Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704.663.1699
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 IN 1 2 15 I 3 I NCO084662 111 12 I 18/10/17 I17 18 I S J 19 L G] 201 I
211111 I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I f6
Inspection
Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA ---------------------- Reserved -------------------
67
1.0 70 71 tyI � I 72 n 73 � 74 751
u I I I I I I I80
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES oermit Number)
10:45AM 18/10/17
16/05/01
Textron remediation site
Little Mtn Rd
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
Gastonia NC 28053
12:30PM 18/10/17
20/08/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Jon Steven Wake man/ORC/828-329-6975/
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Christopher Milici,40 Westminister St Providence RI 029032596/Manager
EHS/401-457-3576/4014576028 No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit 0 Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance 0 Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program 0 Facility Site Review Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Edward Watson MRO GW///
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Docusigned by: Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
*-. aw N P:z� 11/6/18
EAF1611`969AMUAI..
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page#
NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type (Cont.)
NCO084662 I11 121 18/10/17 117 18 ICI
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
A Compliance Inspection was performed on October 17, 2018, for the Textron facility under permit
NC0084662. The facility appears to be in good condition and operating within the specifications of the
permit. The outfall area was reviewed. No foam, color or solids were observed in the outfall.
Prior to the site visit, a file review was performed of the eDMR records for the period of January 2018
through August 2018. Laboratory analytical data was reviewed for the period of 10/2017 through
9/2018. No violations were observed in the review. The records are up to date. Laboratory analytical
data indicates the system is performing well and the effluent water meets 2B surface water standards.
The inspector requested to be notified if Textron is contacted regarding the implementation of a
rebound study for this facility.
Mr. Wakeman was gracious enough to forward a copy of the 2018 Annual Report that he supplies to
DWM, IHSB group.
The recovery well located inside the chainlink fenced was reviewed. Moisture was observed to be
present in the gallery, but there was no standing water.
Page#
Permit: NCO084662
Inspection Date: 10/17/2018
Owner - Facility: Textron remediation site
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable ❑ ❑ ❑
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: The pump & treat system was reviewed during the site visit. The system appeared to be
operating within the specifications of the permit. O&M records for the past 12 months were
reviewed during the site visit and the records are current. There have been no issues with
Chronic Toxicity testing. The facility typically recieves passing results.
The effluent flow meter has current calibration records. According to the O&M records, flow
to the system through the recovery wells is on average 90 GPM.
Permit
Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new
❑
0
❑
❑
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
❑
0
❑
❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment: The permit renewed in May of 2016. The permit was available to be reviewed and the ORC
did not have any questions regarding permit conditions.
Page# 3