20060616 Ver 1_Complete File_20000411

FROM (COMPANY NAME)
;, - -
ADDRESS ' iDA:?•'r"?:';:c;::;:';:iDE21'ilif-:
Inc.
Couriers,
11010 (?ALU e
CITY ZIP CODE (REQUIRED) ;'J?3eK•l:If T1.Mi` i;;;.'• is;rE;:;;;;,"".
•:
:: PO Box 3032
.#.,,....
:: s .: Cary. INC 27519

SENT BY AME1bEPT.)
PHONE ES ::':::1ME
?;t?F•;FA?k?AG,; .;..••..; ....f.G••,HT:!???.:<:'?;;::??

'
' 919)821-5040
(
' T" r, [?Lv' /1 ?r ?.. (Z ::.:. . , ::...: ..:. ........• :....:.:. •......,..
$ ;:
: [phone]
PILLING REFERENCE 1?A-2.U j l t&f s', "b0-'*gl 1 4?e r

'IL14 w,,
..
.
: [phone]
(19)851-8 67
y . 1 ; ?,
• 03-1 a l
I l RU

.. .............:... .. .......
51.8143

19)8

N M
E
O
C MPANY A
TO

..........

BW) 832-3278
ADDRESS HHn<::-:?:<<;;<"•:;=i:;#;i;' ::
ti
CITY ZIP CODE (REQUIRED) METHOD OF PAYMENT
4 IB4 El El
al(0o
l??-? *vti Bill Bill Bill
ATTN.. ( EMEPT.) PHONE Sender Receiver 3rd Party
(Assumed Sender Unless OIMNAse Named)
Itzo in
P•.ODSIGNAT'URE PRINTSIGNATURE
PAID Caslt/CheCk
e
ZLA..-.rne vco i nW rnnv - in IP.TnMFR i
T00 121 - OKI?guaiuROD IsOIZOV TTLT TZ9 6
FAX[phone]
- RUSH DELIVERY
3 Z£:TT ma 90/%0/50
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com April ll 2006
S&EC Project # 8682.W3
To:
US army Corps of Engineers NCDENR-DWQ
Attn: Mr. Todd Tugwell Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd. 2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Suite 120 Parkview Building
Raleigh, NC 27615
_ <.
From: Sean Clark
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: The Parks at Meadowview
Chatham CO, NC
On behalf of the owner, The Parks at Meadowview LLC:, please find attached a complete
application and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USAGE) that the activities proposed below may proceed under Nationwide
Permit 12 & 39 and General Water Quality Certification 3374 & 3402. Please contact me at (919)
846-5900 if you have any questions or require additional information. In addition, please consider .
this application our request for a no practical alternatives determination.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name The Parks at Meadowview
Project Type Residential Subdivision
Owner / Applicant The Parks at Meadowview, LLC
Count Chatham
Nearest Town Pittsboro
Water Body 'Name UTs to Brooks and D Creek
Basin / Sub-basin Cape Fear 03-03-002-HAW
Index Number 16-36
Class WS-IV,B;NSW
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): .034 ac
Wetland Impact acres 0.0 ac
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.0 ac
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. `(acres) 0.034 ac
Total Stream Impact (linear feet):, 301'
Total impact to Buffers NA
Attachments: p
(mss pM(?
• Pre-construction Notification (PCN) L?
L5 `'/ (S D
Application Form
• Agent Authorization APR 1 1 2006
• USGS Map
• Soil Survey Map
Wetland Data Forms
•
DENR - WATER QUALITY
SMIDSTONWATFA
R
_ -impact Maps 9
ANCH
• 401 Processing FeeCheck

Charlotte Office: Greensboro Officer
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. ti ' i = i 6
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
Sri\±<' '_
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: -
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 12 & 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information R19@190MR0
1. Owner/Applicant Information
APR 1 1 2006
Name: The Parks at Meadowview LLC
TftXMN" .1,
sTOR ATE ORMC 1
Mailing Address: Attn: Allen Harrington
2214 Brawlev School Road
Mooresville, NC 28117
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Sean Clark
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the'full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: The Parks at Meadowview
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 9734-23-9527.000.9733-37-5526.000, 9733-75-
0481.000
4. Location
County Chatham Nearest Town: Pittsboro
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): The site is located north
of Pittsboro at a point +/-4.000 feet southeast of the junction of Dry Creek and NC Hi away
87. The site is situated between NC Highway 87 and' Chatham County Rd 1520 Please refer
to the attached Figures 1 and 2 for the project's location on a USGS topographic quadrangle
and the Chatham County Soil SurveYmaps respectively.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 035°46'56.34"N. 079°14'22.30"W . 035°46'50.13"N.
079014'1 1.05"W
6. Property size (acres): +/- 793.1
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT's to Dry Creek and Brooks Creek
8. River Basin: Cape Fear
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/mVs/.)
Page 2 of 9
Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is currently undeveloped and was previously owned
by International Paper. The Property was clear cut +/- 10 years ago. The site to the
immediate north is currently being developed as a single-family residential golf course
community. Other adjacent parcels are forested, in agriculture, or are single-family homes.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project will be a single-family residential subdivision with the typical roads
and utilities. The proposed impacts are due to roads and utilities connecting the various
phases of the project to Hi way 87. Old Graham Road, and the rest of the project. The
future lot layout and road corridors have been finalized and all efforts were made to
county
minimize and avoid any unnecessary impacts. Voluntary riparian buffers as well as
buffers were set in the site plan in order to further protect the integrity of the streams. Bridges
or open bottomed culverts were designed in order to keep the cumulative impacts within the
Nationwide Permit 39 thresholds and further minimize and avoid impacts. Heavy _equipment
typical to this kind of work is to be used.
9. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the project is to construct The
Meadowview Subdivision and provide additional housing to meet the demand for the area.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Permits have been issued on this property (previously known as Brooks Creek Subdivision) to
connect the northern Chapel Ridge Property to NC Highway 87 as per Chatham County's
requirements. S&EC completed a detailed wetland delineation in October of 2004 to provide the
base information required for planning the residential subdivision. In October of 2004 a site
meeting was held with Mr. Todd Tugwell of the USACE to make. "importance" calls on the two
stream features with proposed impacts due to the previously mentioned road installation. A site
meeting was then held with Mr. Eric Kulz of the NCDWO on February 22, 2005 to make
perennial/intermittent determinations on the same two stream features. As a result of these
meetings the road was realigned so as to cross at a point upstream of the perennial/important
point. A site meeting is being held with Mr. Kulz on March 3. 2005 to complete the perennial
calls on the rest of the property. His findings are summarized in IPRRO #05-007. The remaining
survey of the wetland boundaries is being completed and will be submitted for USACE approval
under separate cover.
Page 3 of 9
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permits are known to be required at this time
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms' should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion: If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: : Impacts to intermittent/perennial
channels will result from the proposed installation of roads and required utilities The
impacts are quantified and expounded on below
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on map) ,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
(yes/no) (linear feet)
NA NA NA NA NA NA
Total Wetland Impact (acres) NA
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: +/- 15
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Page 4 of 9
Stream Impact
Number
indicate on ma
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial
or .
Intermittent Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
linear feet Area of
Impact
acres
Road Crossing #1 UT to Brooks Creek Culvert / Rip-Rap Perennial. 4.42 120' .012
Road Crossing #1 UT to Brooks Creek Utility Perennial 4.42 31' .003
Road Crossing #2 UT to Brooks Creek Culvert / Rip-Rap Perennial 5.88 130' .017
Road Crossing #2 UT to Brooks Creek Utility Perennial 6.05 20' .002
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 301* .034
* Of the 301 LF only 250 LF is permanent
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc. Area of
Impact
acres

0 0 0 0 0
1 Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): .034
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact acres : 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) .034
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 301
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? X Yes ? No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
No impacts are proposed to isolated waters.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g.,.livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
Page 5 of 9
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Impacts have been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Road crossings
have been planned at perpendicular angles to stream flow. Streams are not crossed multiple
times by roads. Out of four proposed road crossings, two propose the use of bridges. Pedestrian
trials also use bridges when crossing streams Temporarmpacts resulting from utili line
installations were planned for locations where wetlands did not exist to further avoid additional
impacts eg Dedestrian crossings 1.2.and 3).
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the. impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that maybe appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project;, establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
h!M://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnngide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
Page 6 of 9
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Because there are no impacts to wetlands no wetland mitigation is proposed. Impacts to
perennial streams typically do require mitigation therefore stream mitigation for the 250
linear feet is proposed. If mitigation is required we propose that payment be made to the
NCEEP
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the.NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 250
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No X
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No X
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No X
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Page 7 of 9
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify, )? Yes ? No X
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier tq°t
n

quare feet
(s
o
Mi
1 NA 3 (2 for Catawba) NA
2 NA 1.5 NA
Total NA NA
* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
XI.
XII.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what, type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all, appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0244, or.0260.
This site is within the Cape Fear River Basin, which does not have NC-DWO regulated
riparian buffers.
Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
1.) Homesites 6,000,000 s.f
2.) Roadways 1,777,248 s.f.
3.) Water Booster Station 4,000 s.f
4.) Amenities 161,172 s.f.
5.) Sidewalks and Trials 275,000 s. f,
Total Impervious 8,217,420 s.f. = 23.8%
Total Acreaae of Site 34,547,436 s.f
Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The project will tie into an existing treatment facilitv.in the area.
Page 8 of 9
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No X
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No X
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes No X
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
We have reviewed the "DRAFT Internal Policy. Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality
Certification and Isolated Wetland Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water
Quality on October 3. 2002, version 1.6. The draft states that most residential subdivisions are
unlikely to cause cumulative impacts. The Parks at Meadowview does not meet any of the three
criteria of private projects that can clearly result in cumulative impacts. We anticipate that you
will advise us if a qualitative or quantitative impact analysis is required.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
NA
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
Name:
Environmental Consultants,
Address: CIO G?2G5( itJl`GG?
2 2c q 6pAwl of 5Cf-i rxj- 126 IV 6, 21?1i --
Phone:U? ore fat/- loG-o -l?S (A4y11
i -IL,1RN)
Project Name/Description: -17-1E WC-3 kr MCM b- U VIG-1
Date: Z 2Z (0:-
( The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn:
Field Office: t?a le,, c,
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
S&EC Project # g692-u33
I, the current landowner or municipal official, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants,
PA to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon uest supplemental
information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The 2 2 day of
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government officials to
enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC to arrange a site meeting prior to
visiting the site. -10?1'
r2 l ?
Print Property Owner's or Municipal Official's Name
cc: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NCDENR - DWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
Signature
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
cc: Mr. Sean Clark
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
f N"
_ i //,-'??.? \1 '. / / ' l ?? lei ? ? ?? /'? J ? ??('?
-, \•`y ?? / , \ ? r ) I / \ i r ?i`! ? /i(I 1 / 4 ??.,// 1?,• i l ?r ? t t?'??f ?\ i?f ?i??.
t \ -d
All
10 -S?
4, f I I ( L c.
V -,
LI
'C I N 7:
AI
I P.
J /
t \' ?) v?I,` 1 l \ 'ter
r l ? v ? ??1 v %" ;`? p f r ?1 tl t
t ? •x _ u ? ? ? 1 111 ? -' ?< ?
49?
Project No. Figure I - I :24K USGS
8682.W3 Topographic Quadrangle
I!
t (' \
• wee
y _
r+ y i ?
Project M9r.: The Parks at Meadowview Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
5C 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.• Raleigh, NC 27614
Chatham County, NC [phone] • [phone]
Scale: age: www.SandEC.com
I " = 2,000' ?::, f.5 a l1 >!'d
Bynum and Silk Hope
4/11/06 Quadrangle
WE' AfibgAws tTp A LaY
MANC
H
\ `? t w c.ir`da /?" ' < M?, ^. . /?J p+ Y 1 !. ? ?? L a-\.k l I ) ! \\` ?t l`1 7 ?i ? ?b •
?? ?J / r z r 1)l? }_?' `? I? it?F.?c I, 1-T VOW.
l r
? 0 - a iYJ+4?M r
J
`I •I \? 1l 1`:J _ . tY ,c. is !a_ / a i?J 1 ' y.:
-01
c1
ok"
t i
i 7 / ? J r - r _
\'J ? 9
f r / 1 .??. - -?r / t4
r I r l ) 7 _ t ?'
Project No. FI ure I - I :48K USG5
6G62.W3 9
Topographic Quadrangle
Project Mgr.: Vicinity Map Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
SC 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
The Parks at Meadowvlew [phone] - (sle) 846r9467
Scale: Chatham County, NC Page: www.SandEC.com
I " = 4,000'x::// LS
Bynum, Silk Hope-, Siler City NE,
411 1 /OG and Pitt5boro Quadrangle r4 h 1 2006
WM ANDS MID STOW WAR BRAKH
r 1 r ?_ w. 7G y
Asa Sz 5Fy °a (?L . ?? : sa l", (? ?u ESQ t??.: J l oc\ x, f z t
7 5 #3 8? p i a36 -'` 5 f ti ?t '"_`- f ;1L`
/" „°-:.. ,•?._.. x sus i '?Y - ,.. rsor (Zr)C
$ @ ,.,.?. ! "3011
l {O(o8 z?s Sys
-??5 f30B .. .trJ 5 B ~ ? ij3G s ?q ? ????p :.• ?o'i
r! rat ~n l30D
13 w?
3d, 13DS 23? 130ki ?,,_•.. ?"""? ,? '??'• !3? °+ 5t-7 ?.. t,?,
BA ,o ??,?,. t ?? c_ f?6 .Zp? B 1300 •. { ? - ?,.?
z3 y t r
14
Z56 L33 23 6 .. lgD tar} Z D C
23 z? '` a j A 050, /23
I i4a ` --
`'S ,??•' 1,3sR^rJ '. ? ? .z3? ? x0?? ` Z?S ? ?--? ?•
%
;28` mss. 50ro 5A. (?jpp ..'^? °? i 1
S-2SS !' pct 6 J r 232D Q) , t
2-'?a 130& 1308 1 j 1 ` SO ® Y P-3; LE
!
231 S3 130(-S E7$?..:3 X232.. Q?°? - `?:..?
z3zF
jP 4
,ter; ; sa l ° aa8 C2 ! ?s3c>??G? ?•.i'a;&? yt?e,{'? ^°
I?j{1 _ .li `.5 ?f. ^l „r•? p y X.G?$B 13?r-
38 C S;?
\ ?,,t-'.A' 525 Sig C-
V
a ' 13cc?? II t f °'? ° 6 - 5z5 C?St i <. 4? y o.K '?f
31G 13 '?..• '? 2.
. µ ,' ` a3-?+??' (' e,'GS?s.?' ? G ? •t ? .7Jd ? ???J ??i i1 ..?
If >/ 'w ?ti 1 1} t ! j f (' "af r't 4 f ?.;? l•
??it`F_.? ??,._•._b-? 585_ I _? t ?q? ???.J? ??-ti ?, :'? ,1
µV ` `'? j / _.. rte- y /Jl{13u f? S Y;
Q
52S Ine
(`???``??.`'t ?,' •SZ5"3? ?-'f"?1? ? .t a t:,:'j ?r"',,. ???ti?w fag F- ``r
.< 4 a0? t
;! ^'??• 5a :57 1
?'rrY ? - f ..1,3D ? ? ` .Z 3 g E? ` j?c .-?....`..a ? ? ..+' :'..{ ?, ;?..r^' •'""`?.
c 8t ` !
1303 83 n~ f ?( f: ; ?? 5y t
.2312
? _t *'?• ilry` (130 ?,::,.'^-. 1.•. 7q - 5 `a$. c?2
11 3??h ?'i E t tS? _ j 11??1 1 '.
7. }
%
Pr•ojCCt r o, ficgure 2 - NKCS Soll
8682.W3
Survey Map
Project Mgr.: •
Sc The Parks at Meadowview ( vironmental Consultants, PA
Chatham County, NC - ?-b aven Ridge Rd.• Raleigh, NC 27614
919) 846-5900 - [phone]
Scale: 1 ZOu6 Web Page: www.SandEC.com
I 2,000'
DEN AND STOFWWATER QUALITY
04/I I106 Chatham County Soil Survey +N?71-?
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: The Parks at MeadowView S&EC # 8682.W3 Date: 10/19/2004
Applicant/Owner: The Parks at MeadowView LLC County: Chatham
Investigator: Chris Flowers & Mark Allen State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Headwater Forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: Inside flag 614
If needed, explain on reverse.) 1 11
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Saururus cernuus OBL 9.
2. Juncus effuses FACW+ 10.
3. Quercus alba FACU 11.
4. Cornus amomum FACW+ 12.
5. Ulmus alata FACU+ 13.
6. Acer rubrum FAC 14.
7. Osmunda regalis OBL 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 71%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
_ Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
x Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 3" (in.) _ Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: - (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.)
Remarks: Wetland Hydrology Present
IL-
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Project/Site: The Parks at MeadowView S&EC # 8682.W3 Plot ID: Inside flag 614
SOILS
Map Unit Name Cid Drainage Class: Somewhat Poorly Drained
(Series and Phase): Cid silt loam 6-10% slopes Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic Aquic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? _ Yes _ No
Profile Descrintion:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-12 A 10YR 5/1 10YR 5/6 Silty clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric Soils Present
IL
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes _ No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes _ No X Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No
Remarks:
IL
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: The Parks at MeadowView S&EC # 8682.W3 Date: 10/1912004
Applicant/Owner: The Parks at MeadowView LLC County: Chatham
Investigator: Jason Payne State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Headwater Forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: 10' NE of flag 916
If needed, explain on reverse.) 1 11
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Eulalia viminea Herb FAC+ 9. Toxicodendron radicans Vine FAC
2. Lonicera Japonica Vine FAC- 10. Liquidambar styraciflua Tree FAC+
3. Salix nigra Tree OBL 11.
. Acer rubrum Tree FAC 12.
5. Juncus effusus. Herb FACW+ 13.
6. Diospyros virginiana Tree FAC 14.
7. Fraxinus pennsylvanica Tree FACW 15.
8. Ulmus a/ata Sapling FACU+ 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 80%
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
_ Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 2" (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: - (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0" (in.)
Remarks: Wetland Hydrology Present
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Project/Site: The Parks at MeadowView S&EC # 8682.W3 Plot ID: 10' NE of flag 916
SOILS
Map Unit Name: 525 B Drainage Class: Somewhat poor)
(Series and Phase): Cid-Lignum Complex 2-6% slopes Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic Aquic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? _ Yes _ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
0-12 A 2.5YR 5/4 7.5YR 5/6 Common Distinct Silty clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric Soils Absent
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
IL
77::?
?C
r
n
\V
EXISTING LOGGING
ROAD CROSSING
TEMP. UTILITY CHAPEL RI
IMPACT/ PEDESTRIAN
CROSSING #1
PUD
1 TEMP. UTILITY
?• ~?° IMPACT/ PEDESTRIAN
CROSSING #2
PEDESTRIAN
s ` ! BRIDGE CROSSING
PEDESTRIAN
r. NO IMPACT
, 'BRIDGE CROSSING
.f
r\,
a.Z
n
EXISTING
ROAD CROSSING
PERMITTED BY
CHAPEL RIDGE
IMPACT TOTALS
PERMAN ENTIMPACTS
TOTAL RIP-RAP S.F. 499
L.F. 108 STREAM
TOTAL ROAD FILL S.F. 796
L.F. 142 STREAM
COMBINED TOTAL S.F. 1,295
L.F. 250 STREAM
TEMPOR ARYIMPACTS
TOTAL UTILITY S.F. 1,249
L.F. 239 STREAM

NOTE: EXISTING LOGGING TEMP. UTILITY
ROAD CROSSING IMPACT/ PEDESTRIAN
BUFFERS PER CHATHAM COUNTY CROSSING #3
WATERSHED PROTECTION ORDINANCE
® VOLUNTEER BUFFERS PER PLANNED UNIT
1000' 0 1000` 2000'
SCALE: 1"= 1000' (Horiz.)
* NOTE: SEE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE SECTION
r ,y
j?A>
5o1 t Enhronmenbl Con-it-t,
11010 Raven Wdge Rvad
Rduyh. NC 27614
Phone [phone]
MAXIMUM POTENTIAL
{ --
,IMPERVIOUS CALCULATION
tm ama Tuhl
_ ildm

11,1
O,l
2,l ...?...-
U
C
Z
_
ZZ?N
W h
ZaIQrm
0 L 7UZSm
Qd
- n
t Z
j
V _
0 m
L Z ?S
O tm
] ?m
Z
- /_5 z?
Q
Juu

..... . I _ . -
CT AFtrA 793.1'sx" T-
IYPERVIC"PERCWI GE 211%
-EXI ING LOGGING
' ROA

II
11
I I
I1
1I
I
11
1
J
CROSSING
Nf3#2/-
TEMP. UTILITY IMPACTS
DESTRIAN
BRIDGEC u
NO IMPACT
L @CQML
APR z i2006
?! nDN
I ? io DENR - WATER QUALITY
Ii MTl V$AJ"1DST0rltNATERCFt%,CH
-KUAU UKUSJIN6;;ll PEDESTRIAN 0 0
LITY IMP CT BRIDG CR SSLNG
PEDESTRIAN NO IM ACTlii
Kx, (, BRIDGE CROSSING o "
NO IMPACT ROAD CROSSING #21
BRIDGE CROSSING #11 EM'OIUTILITY IMPACT
TEMP.UTILTYIMPACT 0, 4;-1
TEMP. UTILITY
T> ,.. IMPACT/ PEDESTR
CROSSING #4

P4
0
Sao
® a
® ?0
z V p
? C)
a
N?JW
CC a
aaW
p
w
x
a
NORTH
t
PROPOSED12"
WATER MAI(
PROPOSED J
60 FT ROW

I ,
EXISTING TOP
OF BANK (TYP.)
1 EXISTING
WETLANDS
PERM. RIP-RAP r'
IMPACT 229 S.F.
58 L.F.
CLASS -1 -
24" THICK
TEMPORARY
VEHICULAR I
WOOD BRpGE
NOI CT
ryli
1
1
P OPOSED 6"
ORCE MAIN
-,JPROPOSED 6"
' FORCE MAIN / - - -' x
/
/
EXISTING STREAM

/
PROPOSED CO CRETE
,HEAD WALL (TYP)
i
/
M. ROA FILL
IMPAC
T= .F. /
I
/
I 62 L.F
,P6OPOS2"
WATE
I
N AIN

/ (3.54- /
RAPES RCP /
TEMP. UTILITY PR6PO ED /
IMPACT 137 S.F. 2d' UTI ITY/ /
31 L.F. EASEMENT (TY?
40' 0 40' 80'
SCALE: I "=40' (Honz.)
/
IMPACT TOTALS
PERMANENT IMPACTS
RIP-RAP S.F. 225
L.F. 58 STREAM
ROAD FILL S.F. 305
L.F. 62 STREAM
TEMPORARYIMPACTS
UTILITY S.F. 137
L.F. 31. STREAM
490
PRO
ROVI
485
480
475
470
DATUM ELEV
465.00
C9
5-1 t [nvi--tal Con-ltant?
11010 Raven Ridge Road.
Raleigh, NC 27614
Phone [phone]
OSED PROPOSED
-ROW-

ROPOSED
OADWAY
RADE ROPOSED-COIJ
HEADWALL (TYP CR
)

Sllll
DI TCH GRADE

62 LF
54" RCP

INV IN
476-.61

INV OU
4. 8

CLASS"JA, M

RIPRAP P
lik .

=3
6" FORCE

MA

IN
uu-

Af
RR
MAIN Tinm 12"WATER
AI
l.c
4ENN
NOTE: PR OPOSED CULVERT PIPE BOTTOM
?IJITCH

cv v- m
10+00 11+00
ROADWAY CROSS SECTION
HORIZONTAL SCALE 1"=40'
VERTICAL SCALE 1"=4'
TE
/ [20 1-!
Z 1 -1 2006
WATER QUALITY
10 ST01i,fAi Ew
0
Z
L
L nn
W n
'n UQ
ZIUQ
rm
O Q WzaF
ZQo?
? ? .
:

lr kJ
V
S
_j 0 Z 82
LZ9;N
u
Z>z?
J 0
o
s
o phk
!¦ P
4t

?

a
Z
0 YI
U) it
cc
?A ¦¦

(j)
?
CC E

a
¦i¦ W
j
aa
pa
x Q Qy
lus
- `N?
NORTH
VICINITY
I I \ \\
I EXISTING
TEMP. UTILITY
IMPACT= 121 S.F.
20 L.F.
PROPOSED12"
-WATER MAIN
I III STREAM'
11
EXISTING TOPS
1 OF BANK (TYP.) \
I PROPOSED
1 20' UTILITY \
k 141 EASEMENT "P.) .
PROPOSED` 1
`CONCRETE PERM. OAD FILL
H€ADWALL IMPACT1(491 S.F.
(n'?. 80 L.F. '
/

t FI
I
I
I

ED 6-1 MAIM`
(2? 42" hCP ?-
\ PIPES 1
TEMPORARY
yV.E.HI ULAR
00
MPBRI GE`I \
,\0
1 ' 1? EXISTING
W7LANDS
I 10 1 r
I I
I i I ?
I
I
? ?
I
I I I ? I
40' 0 40' 80'
SCALE: I "=40' (lloriz.)
PERM. Rl"AP
IMPACT= 274,,
50 L.F.\
\ APRON
CLASS "1h
24" THICK \
\ 1
ak \
x
10+00
PROPOSED
O
q-
PROPOSED
W
PROPOSED P
F OPOSED CONCR E
DWA
GRAnF . EEAD4NAEL-
P)

I
i

80 LF
48" RCP

i
NV-I
W -
440.64
INV OUT
EXISTING OPIISED
, 440.26 50, LF
SEWER MAIN RAP PAD

NOTE

PROPOSED CULVE

RT PIPE BOTTOM ROPOSED•t2
WATER MAIN

`

GRAD EtOW NG-D

1'I
0 -
o 0
0 0

o 0

0
IMPACTTOTALS
PERMANENT IMPACTS
RIP-RAP S.F. 1 274
L. F. 50 STREAM
ROAD FILL S.F. 491
L.F. 80 STREAM
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
UTILITY S.F. 121
L.F. 20 STREAM
455
450
445
440
435
DATUM ELEV
430.00
0
1 1 +00
ROADWAY CROSS SECTION
HORIZONTAL SCALE 1"=40'
VERTICAL SCALE 111=4'
12+00
ry z

1
So" C 0 P-ntal Conyuibnts
1 I O 1 I O R ven fLdge P.oad
Ralcgh. NC 27614
Phone [phone] Z Z ILJ

LC ?-

LLl 6 U
ZujQrm
< VJ z a R
C
`l Z g
:j'L
s
J
V
I

0
Z
1
)
-i EL
?o
A
Z
>z
Q ?
-
?
u
-
i0
o tit
0
;??pM? p
D
? ? II
APR 1 1 2006 U)
o
3E4 R-WATERQUAL0 L o
R OSf?tDSTO(".I?ATEA6RNz11 Q () ..
Cell
oc??v
aaQ?
IL
?o
VICINITY
LOCATION
NORTH
? r
/ tXISTING
/ WETLANDS
TEMP. UTILITY }
- - - IMPACT= 121 S.F.
20 L.F. \
/ - - - f PROPOSED y / \
-? CONCRETE CORE PROPOSED P,ROP0':) 12" CROSSING
- -60' ROW- /WATER MAIN_ - - \ \
/

\ -- --/ \ PROPOSED 6"J;
/ \FORCEMAIN

\\ \ i l I

i
/
7 1 \
OROPOSED \
20'UTILITIf
CEASE?dENT,(TYP.1
N \
TEMPORARY \ \ \ \ (? (??? D
\ \ VEHICULAR \ \ p V? D
\ \ 1 1 , l \ WOOD BRIDGE \ \
20 UTILI ?NO'IMPACT \ \ \ \ APR 1 12006
TEINP. UTIITY
PROPOS D \ \
IMPACT=1 5 S.F. \ \ \ R??AL11Y
? 23 L.Fw \ 1 \ \ DENR WAS 6?J
pm5T0tttA1
EASEMEN (TYP.) 1 i ` y \ \ \ v,-'r'Nms
??ll \
// \1 \ \? 1 ? \\ \ \ 111 \ \
1 \ \ 1 \ \ EXISTINGTOP 1 \
\ R 1 11 \ \
\ \ \ RIG TION LI\N \ \ \ OF BANK (TYP.)
1 \ \ \ ? \ EXISTING STREAM 1 , \
40' 0 40' 80'
SCALE: I "=40' (Honz.)
IMPACT TOTALS
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
UTILITY S.F.286
L.F. 53 STREAM
u
UoZ_
Z
w
^
Z
-I'? w(j4

0 z'
z uj
Q W z OT
Qo
?
QZ
_j 0ZA°

rn
LL. n Z
4
s
W
0
?
J?
m
Z?z
?U°
dis

//YAI
V
W
3

NORTH
50'1 t Cmnronmental C--Itante
I 10 1 O Raven Ridge Road
R:1-3h. NC 27614
Phone [phone]
VICINITY
EXISTING TOP
OF BANK (TYP.)
EXISTING-12!-CULVERT--
/EXISTING DIRT DOW

1
TEMP. UTIL?TY ` tt 1?
IMPACT= 87?.F.
22 L.F. PRPPOSFD
CONCR E
HEAD WAL P)
/ N t
i
1 `?// I y
l ? }
L X339 \
p /
/ TEMP. UTILITY
IMPACT=100 S.F.
24 L.F. I
t PROPOSED
50' ROW
I
1 , I

I I ' /
EIXISTIN I
WETLA `DS S I
1 ? I
/ I 1
/
P{ gPOSED
FORCE MAIN WITH
CAPPED END`
t t
t
?ROPOSEDI2"
WATER MAID( WITH
D CAPPED END\
I y SLAB ? IDGE RE \
I/ t I t CRbSSlNG-?,
tt I i
It PR

N ~? \
co \ \
II PROPOSED \? \
20\UTILITY
II \ \ EASEMQNT (TYP.)
\\ i

i
i
soli t r.-n-t.1 C-.ltante
1 1010 Raven Wage Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Phone [phone]
VICINITY
APR 1 1 2006
DENR • WATER QUALITY
}%'rMRM)S R@ STorUANATFR BRANCH
40' 0 40' 80'
SCALE: I "=40' (Honz.)
IMPACT TOTALS
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
UTILITY S.F.187
L.F. 46 STREAM NORTH
A.. 0() z_
r
z ? N H r,
W j9
- G? h
Z
r
WQ
r
O
W Z a?
Q o?
Q Z
" V J Uf Z o
L Z

?Z>Z
QU°-

Wo
Fd I

11
L o
t tz
•
Soil ! CnNronmcntal ConSUlt?nt? ? Z
1 1010 Ra- fLd Road

Raleigh, NC 2761 4
APR 1 12006
7 C n
L L ry m
Phonc (9 19) 646-5900 - n/ W 0
?
Z U1

PROPOSED CONC
ETE BRIDGE

ENDBENT OENR41ATERQUALiTv

SIJYJSTOry?ATERERr,Nch ?
Q
O Z W z?
Qom
CORE SLAB BRID E Z
CROSSING BACK FILL r h ? z Ao
`J
?
RIOG ?- Z
Q
ENDBENT W
1 z
BACK FILL i ?l m
?z?
Q

45
T
?

" I VICINITY

I I? l i t

PROPO
ED
/-LOCATION 0

EXISTING ROAD
GRADE
Y
? 1
?

0
o
I
?
GRADE ,
I -
o
PROPOSE01 "
WATER MAIN 11
PROPOSED 6"
RGE-MAIN
o
I'm 0 m,
wp W

S
M Q
TREA
BANK
TOBANK cc p?

'
40 0 40 80'
t

5C LE: I "=40' (Horiz )
SC LE: I "=4' (Vertical ) cc

CO N 00 N .- N O M
m
cD O
I? Q)
cfl
cD
O O
(D
to
L
cfl
N
c0
? O
s
r- ? .

63 00 64 00 65 -00 I 66 -00 67+ 00 NORTH
1 ill !?\? I
I I I ,1 } I
i?
\
11 i
IEXISTIN 1
!
1
1
1{
?1\
?I,ETLA DS (TYP.) .
} PROPQSED
20' UTI , ITY //
EASEM T(TYP.) //
I ?/
J i //
I } /li
I I/ /
1 1%
11
PEDEST IAN } 1
} BRIDGE ROSSINGI
1SEEDETAILSHEET !
I
( I
1 /

V 11
??' ,??,y-j II I I 1
I I 1 1 1
?-?' ? 11 I ( II 1 1 1
! ?PROP?QSED 8" I I I 1
IRRIGAT100 LINL 1
} TEMP. UT+LITY } ! ` I
}
IMPACT= 09 S.F. ! 1
1 1! 21 L.F. I } !1 ! 1 1
!I} , ! 1 1 ! t
II EXISTING OP } } }
+ I 9F BANK (?YP.) } I } }
t I !I? I } }? } }
? I }}
? 11 I _ C? I I I
40' 0 40' 80'
SCALE: I "=40' (Honz.)
IMPACT TOTALS
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
UTILITY S.F.109
L. F. 21 STREAM
50" R Environmental Consultants
1 1 01 0 Raven fLdge Road
Ralcgh. NC 27614
Rhone (01 9) 84G-5500
jU
APR 1 1206
WETWDSR9)STWWMX 6PANCN
U
.. ''^^ rr??
V V z _
CL4 Z
r
Z W u9
h
a1Qr?
0 al z a

V J?z °

r?
LZ

m
a,
] ?m
m
?
z>zr
j O
e
® 0
® II
G ®
® sJ
3
1 IL
I d?
€4 ,I E
NORTH
VICINITY
500
49(
48(
c
c
10+00
11+00 12+00 13+00
40' 0 40' 80'
+r
SCALE: I "=40' (Horiz.)
SCALE: I "=4' (Vcrbcal)
14+00
15+00
[10
I 1 12006
Z 5i

ZWQZu
_ ^/ W n
Q W z am
Qz
?YL
rh
V -j z m
o n
LZ
;9
G S?n

Q?ZP
JUu

NORTH
VICINITY
i
j '
r ' !
f l
?PROPO$ED
20' UTILITY /
EASEMENT ('FYP.)

/
?/ l 11 /l 1
t ?
\

i
i

EXISTING
WETLANDS (TYP.)

PEDESTRIAN
BRIDGE CROSSING
SEE DETAIL SHEET
\
\ \ PROPO?D-8"
\ IjRIGATION LINE
C \ \
x
>)
/I \\ \
/ T?f?'IP. UTILITY
/ I PACT= 95 S \ \ - \
/ 25 L.F. /
EXISTIjCGTOP r / ? \ \ \
OF BANK (TYP.) \ \ _`
I ? I \,
l
t ?
40' 0 . 40' 80'
SCALE: 1 "=40' (Horiz.)
IMPACTTOTALS
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
UTILITY I.S.F.195
L.F. 25 STREAM
5o1 t Enwonmrntal C-ltant?
1 1010 P-n Pa," Road
Raleigh. NC 27614
Phone [phone]
VICINITY
,? APR 112006
t?ENl?P7?S ? n? ? ??cn
u
n ff?? ffff??
Z_
u
Z
„
l
NC
Z G Nm
Zu Qt-
Z W Zak
Qom
z
`J Z °
0 "
LZ n
GS?
O m
-
o
?
e
o y,?

CC X 1v
m
a 0

NORTH
1 1 1 1 1 `\ 1 i `\ \ \ \1 ? \\ 1 11 I
1 1 1 1 1 ?\/ I l\ \ 1 1 ? 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ?\ \/ I 1\ I 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 111 I 'EXISTINq I 11 1 1 ( I
1 1 1 1 1 11 l WETLANDS OP.) I 1 ( ? \
1 1 1 1 1 1 ?\ \ 1 t ? I ? ? ? I \
X11`11\ \` \ I I ?
1 1 1` 1 1 1 \\ \\ \__\ \` ( 1 1
1 1 \ 1 i 1 \ \ - \ `\ \ `\ \ \I ` `I 1
1 1\ 1 ? I 11 ` `I 11 ` \ `\ ` \ \ \ `\ \\
`\ 11 ' ' \ `? 1 11 \\ ?\ `\ PROPOSED8"\
tf \
\ 1 1 \ \ 11 \ BRIDGE CR NSS?NG ` IRRIGATIQN LINE\ \ _\
\ 1 ` ` 1 1 \ 11 / SEE DETAILS EEC \ \ ` \ \
! PROPOS D
\ \
20'bTILIV
\/ \ \- - -\ - \ \
EAS,EMENl1(TYP.)
/ ll I I 7 1
I I I
I 1 I
I l I
J ?
i
-T Iyp. UTIbTY `
I IMPACT=152; S.F.
t 23 LIF. '
/ I 1
i
EXISTINTOP \ `\ \
\ \ OF BAKKI(TYP.) I \ \
1 11 `? `\
40' 0 40' 80'
SCALE: I "=40' (Honz.)
IMPACT TOTALS
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
UTILITY S.F.152
L.F. 23 STREAM
Soil • r---t.1 C--Tt-tb
1 1010 Raven R a.3e Road
R?iagh. NC 27614
rh=I [phone]
VICINITY
APR 1 12006
UENR•%IIATER CUAUT1
Yr kT L q= N 0 STWV AYAT ER BV4*-r.
U?Z_
?l z ? N Nm
n/ W n
z
0 W zc s
;F
? Q
o
Z
z
IL n Z an
1 4
d
m
W?,m
OJ
>
Q6O
-j u
o
a
G
U)
® II
Q
U) w
a ?a
IL

NORTH
i
I I I I ? ,? I I\
L, f,_--?,\ I I \
I I I I\? ? ?? '> I I\
I I I 1 ?\\`
1 I ? ' ? \?\ ' III ? I I I
1 I I
? I I ? 11 \ \? II ___ ? I
// I I I \\\ / EXISTINGTOP I I
OF BANK (TYP.) I I
?y
/ 1 1 1 \ PEDESTRIAN
/ 1 1 1 \ BRIDGE CROSSING I
\ 1 \ \ SEE DETAIL SHEET
PROPOSED 8" I /
I PRQPOSPD IRRIGATION LINE I
20' UTILI )
\ EASEMENT (TYP.) \ I - - _ J/ /
_ -\ - - - , TEMP. UTtITY
\ \IMPACT=lg2S.F.1 1
\ \ \ ?0 L.F., 1
? ? I II
`? ?? ,1 1 I I I
? ? 1 t I I
?? `?? ?? 11 1 1 1 1
? ? ? 111
`? `? ?? 11 11 I
1
? I ? \ 1
I ?
Ii
I
111 r__ -\
111 I \ \
1 1 t ?
1
1 ?
40' 0 40' 80'
SCALE: 1 "=40' (Honz.)
IMPACT TOTALS
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
UTILITY S.F.162
L.F. 20 STREAM
1
I
I
I b
U? \
Z \ 1
J \
W
EL
/EL

1
1
I
I
1
}
I
1
1
11
5-1 i Environmental Consultants
1 1010 Raven fLdyc Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
ph.- 0315) 646-5900
VICINITY
p1R@[R0W@00
APR 1 t 2006
1172 DSAWSTC -rYATMCR>tiFr?a
u
Z_
Z
Z
?Nm
/ IL n
Z uj
0 ZUjZOf
Q
<
I? Z
:
E
2, t
:
r h
V -j-0Z?
O
LZ
GYQ
"
W `V
J
Z
\Z?>
-j
o
e y,?
II

CC 3: v
b ?

NORTH 11
15' CLEARING LIMIT
& WIDE MAX
2" ASPHALT
G" GRAVEL
PEDESTRIAN / CART TRAIL SECTION
NT5
15' CLEARING LIMIT
8' WIDE MAX
PA??? fi- ? TREATED TIMBER5
O.C. (TYP)
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE 5ECTION
@ WETLAND CROSSING
NT5
Utilities • Pipeline
Construction •
. Logging •
Houso Moving
Portable
Logging mats are 10' x
14' or 10' x 16'. They lay
down in sections end to end
for roads and bridges, or
side by side for logging
decks. They are easy to
pick up and lay down with a
loader. Mats are picked up
at the end or in the middle.
Providing Quality Portable Road Mats
CONSTRUCTED wRH
2-x S' OAK BOLTED
TOGETHER WITH &6112" BOLTS
Double-Track Mats & Deck Mats are:
• Portable
• Reusable
• Cost Effective
• Environmentally friendly
Stream Crossings
Logging Mats and Bridge
Mats are a Best
Management Practice
(BMP) for minimum
disturbance. They are
cheaper and easier to install
than culverts. Also, they do
not restrict flow, wash out,
or require putting foreign fill
material around culverts in a
stream.
Bridge I Crane Mats
Our 4' wide mats are
made with 8" to 12" oak
timbers with 1" bolts
available in 16' to 24'
lengths. Other sizes upon
request. They can be used
by themselves or with our
portable road mats laid on
top.
D Cep III Qther Get Yap Dowril
TEMPORARY WETLAND CROSSING DETAIL
Soil t Cnvironmental Con?ultanb
1 1010 Raven RLdge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Phone [phone]
?r=adC p
C?
1
APR 1 12006
DENR-WATER QUALITY
A-rTL9@3AlMSTO'iIA ATERERAtXH
u
Z L N °
W 4
Z ILI
O ILI z s f
QZ ? Qoe'-
_j 0Z?0
0 °'
0.Z n

?4
I u
G
W
O?um
m

59
Z u
Q
-IUo
0
a
2'

L a
H1
J

I elEa d0
?

ie
ol? L?
DOUBLE-TRACK ROAD MAT
OF Vv n t? Michael F. Easley, Governor
P
Ot t!
t
Willi
J
S
G
`
i ecre
am
. Ross
r.,
ary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Cy C Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
April 24, 2006
DWQ Project # 06-0616
Chatham County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Allen Harrington
The Parks At Meadowview, LLC
2214 Brawley School Road
Mooresville, NC 28117
Subject Property: The Parks At Meadowview, LLC
Ut to Dry Creek & Brooks Creek [030604, 16-36, WSIV, B, NSW]
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Harrington:
On April 24, 2006, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated April 11, 2006,
to impact 301 linear feet of perennial stream (250 linear feet permanent impacts, 51 linear feet temporary
impacts) to construct the proposed residential subdivision. The DWQ has determined that your
application was incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will
require additional information in order to process your application to impact protected wetlands and/or
streams on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive five copies of the additional information
requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as required by 15A NCAC 2H
.0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information.
Please provide the following information so that we may continue to review your project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Please provide documentation from the NCEEP indicating their willingness to accept your
request to purchase stream mitigation credit to mitigate for the proposed perennial stream impacts
listed in your PCN application per section VIII, No. 1.
2. Please provide a location map for the project.
3. Please provide full plan sheets for the Overall Impact Map.
Please contact the DWQ within three weeks of the date of this letter to verify that you have received this
letter and that you remain interested in continuing to pursue permitting of your project and will be
providing the DWQ the requested information at a later date. Please contact me in writing and Eric Kulz
of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office. If we do not hear from you within three weeks, we will assume
that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project as withdrawn.
None Carolina
?tura!!rf
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone [phone] / Fax [phone]
Internet: http://www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
The Parks At Meadowview, LLC
Page 2 of 2
April 24, 2006
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters
or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not
authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly or Mr. Ian McMillan at 919-733-
1786 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
Cyndi Karoly, Supervisor
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBK/ijm
cc: Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Sean Clark, Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A., 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
Filename: 060616TheParksAtMeadowview(Chatham)On_Hold

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com April 11, 2006
S&EC Project # 8682.W3
To: ?
US army Corps of Engineers t NCDENR-DWQ
Attn: Mr. Todd Tugwell Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd. 2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Suite 120 Parkview Building
Raleigh, NC 27615
From: Sean Clark
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: The Parks at Meadowview
Chatham CO, NC
On behalf of the owner, The Parks at Meadowview LLC., please find attached a complete
application and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) that the activities proposed below may proceed under Nationwide
Permit 12 & 39 and General Water Quality Certification 3374 & 3402. Please contact me at (919)
846-5900 if you have any questions or require additional information. In addition, please consider
this application our request for a no practical alternatives determination.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name The Parks at Meadowview
Project Type Residential Subdivision
Owner/ Applicant The Parks at Meadowview, LLC
Count Chatham
Nearest Town Pittsboro
Water Body Name UTs to Brooks and D Creek
Basin / Sub-basin Cape Fear 03-03-002-HAW
Index Number 16-36
Class WS-IV,B;NSW
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): .034 ac
Wetland Impact acres : 0.0 ac
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.0 ac
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.034 ac
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 301'
Total Impact to Buffers NA
Attachments:
• Pre-construction Notification (PCN)
Application Form
• Agent Authorization
• USGS Map
• Soil Survey Map
• Wetland Data Forms
• Impact Maps
• 401 Processing FeeCheck
D
APR I 1 2006
p?S AND STEOfiAiWATET
WEn BRWM
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
,ti,'
P!
F r;+- ?
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 12 & 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: The
aRVEMM-2 I
APR 1 1 2006
Mailing Address: Attn: Allen Harrington y turosntaosro ? SlH
2214 Brawley School Road
Mooresville NC 28117
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Sean Clark
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants. PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: The Parks at Meadowview
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 9734-23-9527.000,9733-37-5526.000,9733-75-
0481.000
4. Location
County: Chatham Nearest Town: Pittsboro
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): The site is located north
of Pittsboro at a point +/-4,000 feet southeast of the junction of Drv Creek and NC Hi hway
87 The site is situated between NC Highway 87 and Chatham County Rd 1520. Please refer
and the Chatham County Soil Survey maps, respectively.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 035°46'56.34"N, 079°14'22.30"W : 035°46'50.13"N,
079014'1 1.05"W
6. Property size (acres): +/- 793.1
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT's to Dry Creek and Brooks Creek
8: River Basin: Cape Fear
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/admin/mgps/.)
Page 2 of 9
Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is currently undeveloped and was previously owned
by International Paper. The Property was clear cut +/- 10 years ago. The site to the
immediate north is currently being developed as a single-family residential golf course
community. Other adjacent parcels are forested, in agriculture, or are single-family homes.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project will be a single-family residential subdivision with the typical roads
and utilities The proposed impacts are due to roads and utilities connecting the various
phases of the project to Highway 87, Old Graham Road and the rest of the project. The
future lot layout and road corridors have been finalized and all efforts were made to
minimize and avoid any unnecessary impacts. Voluntary riparian buffers as well as county
buffers were set in the site plan in order to further protect the integrity of the streams. Bridges
or open bottomed culverts were designed in order to keep the cumulative impacts within the
Nationwide Permit 39 thresholds and further minimize and avoid impacts. Heavy equipment
typical to this kind of work is to be used
9. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the project is to construct The
Meadowview Subdivision and provide additional housing to meet the demand for the area.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Permits have been issued on this property (previously known as Brooks Creek Subdivision) to
connect the northern Chapel Ridge Pro ep_rty to NC Highway 87 as per Chatham Count
requirements S&EC completed a detailed wetland delineation in October of 2004 to provide the
base information required for planning the residential subdivision. In October of 2004 a site
meeting was held with Mr. Todd Tugwell of the USACE to make "importance" calls on the two
stream features with proposed impacts due to the previously mentioned road installation. A site
meeting was then held with Mr. Eric Kulz of the NCDWO on February 22, 2005 to make
perennial/intermittent determinations on the same two stream features. As a result of these
meetings the road was realigned so as to cross at a point upstream of the perennial/important
point A site meeting i_s being held with Mr. Kulz on March 3, 2005 to complete the perennial
calls on the rest of the prosy. His findings are summarized in IPRRO #05-007. The remaining
survey of the wetland boundaries is being completed and will be submitted for USACE approval
under separate cover.
Page 3 of 9
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permits are known to be required at this time.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: : Impacts to intermittent/perennial
channels will result from the proposed installation of roads and required utilities. The
impacts are quantified and expounded on below
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year
Floodplain Nearest
Stream Impact
(acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) (yes/no) (linear feet)
NA NA NA NA NA NA
Total Wetland Impact (acres) NA
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: +/ 15
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Page 4 of 9
Stream Impact
Number
indicate on ma
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial
or .
Intermittent Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
linear feet Area of
Impact
acres
Road Crossing #1 UT to Brooks Creek Culvert / Rip-Rap Perennial 4.42 120' .012
Road Crossing #1 UT to Brooks Creek Utility Perennial 4.42 31' .003
Road Crossing #2 UT to Brooks Creek Culvert / Rip-Rap Perennial 5.88 130' .017
Road Crossing #2 UT to Brooks Creek Utility Perennial 6.05 20' .002
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 301 * .034
* Of the 301 LF only 250 LF is permanent
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc. Area of
Impact
acres

0 0 0 0 0
Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the vroiect:
Stream Impact (acres): .034
Wetland Impact (acres : 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. acres .034
Total Stream Impact linear feet : 301
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? X Yes ? No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
No impacts are proposed to isolated waters.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
Page 5 of 9
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Impacts have been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Road crossings
have been planned at perpendicular angles to stream flow. Streams are not crossed multiple
times by roads. Out of four proposed road crossings, two propose the use of bridges. Pedestrian
trials also use bridges when crossing streams. Temporary Impacts resulting from utility line
installations were planned for locations where wetlands did not exist to further avoid additional
impacts eg=pedestrian crossings 1.2.and 3).
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
ht V://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
Page 6 of 9
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Because there are no impacts to wetlands no wetland mitigation is proposed. Impacts to
perennial streams typically do require mitigation therefore stream mitigation for the 250
linear feet is proposed. If mitigation is required we propose that payment be made to the
NCEEP
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 250
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No X
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No X
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No X
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian' and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Page 7 of 9
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No X
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 NA 3 (2 for Catawba) NA
2 NA 1.5 NA
Total NA NA
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
XI.
MI.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B.0242 or.0244, or.0260.
This site is within the Cane Fear River Basin, which does not have NC-DWO regulated
riparian buffers
Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
1.) Homesites 6,000,000 s. f.
2.) Roadways 1,777,248 s. f.
3.) Water Booster Station 4,000 s.f
4.) Amenities 161,172 s.f.
5.) Sidewalks and Trials 275,000 s.f.
Total Impervious 8,217,420 s.f. = 23.8%
Total Acreage of Site 34,547,436 s.f
Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The project will tie into an existing treatment facility in the area.
Page 8 of 9
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 211.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No X
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No X
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes No X
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
We have reviewed the "DRAFT Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality
Certification and Isolated Wetland Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water
Quality on October 3. 2002, version 1.6. The draft states that most residential subdivisions are
unlikely to cause cumulative impacts. The Parks at Meadowview does not meet any of the three
criteria of private projects that can clearly result in cumulative impacts. We anticipate that you
will advise us if a qualitative or quantitative impact analysis is required.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
Name:
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Address: G10 Gi2G5C t i2 (=SCz??tl.GS LyG
2 Zc q 6eAiwL,01 5Ct-1 C;r-L /I b M 00A&sVi ay' /V(-- -7q113
Phone: -7 dq-?C1J -1l'U(v o,2 ?d[(- -
V100 - U
AM Project Name/Description: -lG PtIU65 AT /u0l bD W VIG-W
Date: to&
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn:
Field Office: 1?c, e , c,
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
S&EC Project # 8692-w3
I, the current landowner or municipal official, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants,
PA to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental
information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The 2 2-t' day of kI«-
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government officials to
enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC to arrange a site meeting prior to
visiting the site..
2 ?
Print Property Owner's or Municipal Official's Name
cc: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NCDENR - DWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
or Municipal Official's Signature
cc: Mr. Sean Clark
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
- } ems. ? ^\?r --. b
507
\.• I ? % r`\ `??.`-\ ? N8 .- f'` " 1 ,? ?\ /? ?'rl? ? / / r ? \i. ?i it ? ? i
? I s1 /( . , ? 1 /,' '? --?1 .? ?/,? ?-• ?'\\(_` ? r ?' ? ' ?? ? fig `` -
/.'_' ??l - _?1 l ?? II i?? PQ.I• '?..?µ?,\\ ?^??? Jh°?v` rh ?' (i=?,4\?r r.
I Fri I , ,?\ t ? ??? ? ^- ? 1 `- ? •3), ? ?? ? / ? ? ,
? , ,, ,\ r? ?' i ???' . l \ ? ? ? (/ • ^ ?? ?- ?,I! ? ('"?-? '7i7%?ll w ,'? f 1, `
1_ r r
- ` ??.. _^ ?? J? i. •rZ/-?/ice ?rl \.t ]??` r !'?` \,\?7??- -;
G Ii '`? J1 "\ \'
162- 1, f 7 ?I ? \v/i
` j \ < \ k
Irl ` r
?- ?N 1 , ,? ,i^, ? ? -rte A+lieSP! ff`^
?..,.?I ?t
i-Ir492?
-2 X
w-mmin
Project No. Figure I - I :24K USGS
8682.W3 Topographic Quadrangle
Project M9r.: The Parks at Meadowvlew Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
1 n Ridge Rd-- Raleigh, NC 27614
sc Chatham Count NC
Scale: y' 1 46-5900 • [phone]
I " = 2,000' age: www.SandEC.com
Bynum and Silk Hope
4/11 /06 Quadrangle
LAWLIS AM STow'r;'7?W; r<Aw
} - zb c a,
1 4
1 t ef.rtq '• ? d i - `tY? `1^dp F..?. _ q t` ,r?- ' , ,;.
:li- 1 ^i4.. Y' 1
C. r
-? ) ,' A 3 ? III 1
'mot > S ?/^
' - 1 I ?'. J 1 l !?W-; 1 I l
?1{l..l fC ' i < t N'T{ a
'3 p
i f ? lh o,1 ?a e
v t . I "? 1 s9 ?? ,'
r L u1s t
r ? 1I
i _ bf``4 \ Iv , 1 z o
cwn d>.nipy `,d 4 - } ail 1 ? ~ ) 4 r "/ I `
o f yr .
Y {' y'
Project No. FI ure I - I :46K USGS
8682.W3 9
Topographic Quadrangle
Project Mgr.: VIGICIIty Map
SC Soil& Environmental Consultants, PA
The Parks at Meadowvlew 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] - [phone]
Scale: Chatham County, NC Web Page: www.SandEC.com
I " = 4,000' , rr-a LrR
Bynum, Silk (lope, Siler City NE, L 1??
4/ 1 1 /06 and 1'ittsboro Quadrangle t7 r, 1U?
DENR - W,
WETIANDS,Wp sTWW41R 844N M
1t7 S.Z l?pi _ r ,..F Sc - ??IDJ .3.Sf" \ ?.. "So LYJ l_ `?
..? _ p8 \v n d i 130E Sa6 ? ! B Z?' .
?h
r:
'?A
?7 30? 5$ a i 73pty ^ 18 7 N t3a ??E
77
i r: 't3D0 20?g
.?G J'*30? z3eus ?a !30 ?b YI `? :1?J -c = r t
t'i 9 > -? W? i4 50B 137
i !
a3
1,6b 10,x- rp 1300 I
2SB Z3 a f? i ':z i _ ?2D .O
p B ?:eL '?,i?A ?s 6 , d t?s? 2 zD.. sA? Y ?!"- > ?A„"\ ? - 1:?D }
23AE
? t G ? t " c,? ?-• Yyr.?7y? :? vQ ?„_ ?C ? ? •.? 1 3.3,,7.
`3282' ?3oB ?szc 3x .* M-
su o € 23 e c'? r
i 30
130 i3? i. S ??-lr?nC 1 vt xasE ?3?? 3=-? ,a s '' 1 t:1? .
All
?.
?r S? I `r t 3.E?;i. ' ?SB ?f - szs ?'rr - ?'^'?;-?- Z3s;;
ro-
__?0 5258;- •+J ?i .. ?? +{ ? 1 ? ?? ?#? ? r . -? ` ? r ???? ?4 t !
?.
4? 1 ?', rj ?' '1"?y an ?Y•'rw? w ? '° ?? d?i`?„3?'') :`f
5c?'8 ?:?? ? ?F' ?sz58 .?, P v 'cs !?^ . noy?? F.?, - `'Rr,• ? >??:_ J '`;
Z t r, r . 'SSE' tti ?1S' i3tE "° tL ?1 .. ? .f
-rr h L? ?_ ?br {k 5! 13p <381 as_:P ?w r-z r -1 `s
..r.} t?Sf ] 308 ?'Y-^"-*-r-./ --?? .sti`5" '? S ,4? '? -? , •t'
Project No. Figure 2 - NRCS Soil
8682.W3 Survey Map .
Project Mgr.: •
5C The Parks at Meadowview 'ronmental Consultants, PA
Chatham Count NC 1 en Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
y? Zp06 ) 846-5900 [phone]
Scale:
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
1 ° = 2,000'
Tprc?R ??
04/1 1 /06 Chatham County Soil 5urvey ?^'?tftWC8.
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: The Parks at MeadowView S&EC # 8682.W3 Date: 10/19/2004
Applicant/Owner: The Parks at MeadowView LLC County: Chatham
Investigator: Chris Flowers & Mark Allen State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Headwater Forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: Inside flap 614
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Saururus cernuus OBL 9.
2. Juncus effuses FACW+ 10.
3. Quercus alba FACU 11.
. Cornus amomum FACW+ 12.
5. Ulmus alata FACU+ 13.
6. Acer rubrum FAC 14.
7. Osmunda regalis OBL 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 71%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
_ Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
x Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: _
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 3" (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: - (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.)
Remarks: Wetland Hydrology Present
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Project/Site: The Parks at MeadowView S&EC # 8682.W3 Plot ID: Inside flag 614
SOILS
Map Unit Name Cid Drainage Class: Somewhat Poorly Drained
(Series and Phase): Cid silt loam 6-10% slopes Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic Aquic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? _ Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
0-12 A 10YR 5/1 10YR 5/6 Silty clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric Soils Present
IL
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes _ No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes _ No X Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? X Yes _ No
Remarks:
IL
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: The Parks at MeadowView S&EC # 8682.W3 Date: 10/19/2004
Applicant/Owner: The Parks at MeadowView LLC County: Chatham
Investigator: Jason Payne State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Headwater Forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: 10' NE of flag 916
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Eulalia viminea Herb FAC+ 9. Toxicodendron radicans Vine FAC
2. Lonicera japonica Vine FAC- 10. Liquidambar styraciflua Tree FAC+
3. Salix nigra Tree OBL 11.
4. Acer rubrum Tree FAC 12.
5. Juncus effusus. Herb FACW+ 13.
6. Diospyros virginiana Tree FAC 14.
7. Fraxinus pennsylvanica Tree FACW 15.
8. Ulmus alata Sapling FACU+ 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 80%
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water. 2" (in.) _ Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: - (in.) _ FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0" (in.)
Remarks: Wetland Hydrology Present
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Project/Site: The Parks at MeadowView S&EC # 8682.W3 Plot ID: 10' NE of flag 916
SOILS
Map Unit Name: 525 B Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly
(Series and Phase): Cid-Lignum Complex 2-6% slopes Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic Aquic Hap ludults Confirm Mapped Type? _ Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon _(Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
0-12 A 2.5YR 5/4 7.5YR 5/6 Common Distinct Silty clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric Soils Absent
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes _ No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
IL

AS F P„Jr SL*e
j 2:<I- 71
j
Ij -
I,
jl
I?
7V
EXISTING
ROAD CROSSING
PERMITTED BY
CHAPEL RIDGE
IMPACT TOTALS
PERMAN ENT IMPACTS
TOTAL RIP-RAP S.F. 499
L.F. 108 STREAM
TOTAL ROAD FILL S.F. 796
L.F. 142 STREAM
COMBINED TOTAL S.F. 1,295
L.F. 250 STREAM
TEMPOR ARY IMPACTS
TOTAL UTILITY S.F.
1 1,249
L. F. 1239 STREAM
.f
z
NOTE: EXISTING LOGGING TEMP. UTILITY
ROAD CROSSING IMPACT/ PEDESTRIAN
BUFFERS PER CHATHAM COUNTY CROSSING #3
WATERSHED PROTECTION ORDINANCE
® VOLUNTEER BUFFERS PER PLANNED UNIT
1000' 0 10001 2000'
SCALE: 1"= 1000' (Horiz.)
* NOTE: SEE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE SECTION
<Sa
n I-

?i
ii
I i1 -!
11 --
11 ---
.j 1 -
son s em?ro?m??a1 coo,olt,?r?
1 1010 Raven Ridge Road
I I R 1-3h• NC 27614
Ph ne (91 9) 846-5900
It MAXIMUM POTENTIAL
I I 41UPERVIOUS CALCULATION
II
Ynpervl"us '-
EXI ING LOGGING
ROA CROSSING
&65fNG-#2t
TEMP. UTILITY IMPACTS
DESTRIAN
BRIDGE C a
NOIMPACT
ROAD CROSSING #11 r-PEDE
,ice.
iarneertes 6 OGO E00 f I.. - ...-
ewaay, .. 177720 i[
Nate BantertUTP SY 1000 e[
- -
Imerk7 161177 1 [--}
-
W AREA ...
m7Y11 icR1
- ??
CEMTAGE 23A,%?
jaooN RD
'??L1VL5
?
11
i I ?oA
m?.. APR X Z 2006
ii C)DN
r-o
I j''z DENR • WAS OUA! ITY
I Io'N?OSiO tl{,yATER ERg1,?H
0
PEDESTRIAN NO IMOACTjj
BRIDGE CROSSING o
NOIMPACT ROA¢ CROSSING #21
.;'
EVIA UTILITY IMPACT
??•'BRIDGE CROSSING #11
TEMP. UTILTY IMPACT 11
1 I ~, TEMP. UTILITY
IMPACT/ PEDE
CROSSING 94
u
VZ
rl Z
L ?m
N
n
.) W
VL O
ZII-IQrm
Q
? Wz??
QZQo?
? r
lr KJ
V
Jzam
y
LZ
W ;?
O am
Z?Z
_j 00
e

® pp?e
a a2

®
0 an
2
a ® 7
®
;W
Q
pQ
!?
'1i?ai
® VI

I
Y5< `? NORTH

' EXISTING LOGGING
ROAD CROSSING
?i TEMP. UTILITY CHAPEL RI
' . IMPACT/ PEDESTRIAN
+,•` FCROSSING #1
PUD
TEMP. UTILITY
?• IMPACT/ PEDESTRIAN
CROSSING #2
PEDESTRIAN
BRIDGE CROSSING
PEDESTRIAN NOIMPACT
a
?BRIDGE CROSSING
?V ,Ijl? ?-s3 tutwr.r
{
{
PROPOSED 12
WATER MAIM
PROPOSED
60 FT ROW
PERM. RIP-RAP
IMPACT 229 S.F.
58 L.F. {
CLASS "1"I
24" THICK I {
TEMPORARY {
VEHICULAR I
WOOD BRPGE
\IA IIIIf#!+T
I?
EXISTING TOP
OF BANK (TYP.)
EXISTING
t WETLAND
/
\ r
?Aj
P OPOSED 6" \
/ORCE MAIN 1
-PROPOSED 6" ^ _ _ \
FQRCE MAIN / x
i
EXISTING STREAM-
JAI/
I! /
` PROPOSED CONCRETE
,,HEADWALL (TYP)
/ /4ILL
I IMPACT= ROTA. S.F. /
I 162 L.F
,P OPOS t'
I /WATER MAIN

/
/ QYP 4 RCP /
TEMP. UTILITY PROPO ED /
IMPACT 137 S.F. 2d' UTI ITYI
31 L.F. EAS?MENf (TY? /
_J
? r
40' 0 40' 80'
SCALE: I "=40' (Horiz.)
IMPACT TOTALS
PERMANENT IMPACTS
RIP-RAP S.F. 225
L.F. 58 STREAM
ROAD FILL S.F. 305
L.F. 62 STREAM
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
UTILITY S.F. 137
L.F. 31. STREAM
t!1lNAIITv
TION
Sal t Cmnronmencal Coroultants
I 10 1 O Raven Ridge Road.
Balogh, NC 27614
Phone [phone]
'OSED PROPOSED
ROW

ROPOSED
@ADWA
RADE j PROPOSED COI
HEADWALL (TY JCR
P)

STIN
D ITCH GRADE

54" RCP
0

INV IN
76-.6
INV OUT
I;?iv8
4
WA

63 0 Lt-
_
CLASS "1"
RIPRAP PAD
6"FORCE
AI

MAIN 12" WATER
AI
NOTE: PR OPOSED CULVERT PIPE BOTTOM
T'1.0 LOW EXI G DITCH

10+00 11+00
ROADWAY CROSS SECTION
HORIZONTAL SCALE 1"=40'
VERTICAL SCALE 1"=4'
.TE
qoe@ D
12006
ryR a DER Eu CH
u
z
C
L n?

Iuj , n O
V In
Z W
Qrm
O
Wz
Z?Z:j Q°?
r:
J 6 z"R2
L p r?
Z
"
_j
Q?z
-
j 60

F. o

® ?
®
Q II
Qe>t
b

NORTH
1.11
490
PRO]
ROW
485
480
475
470
DATUM ELEV
465.00
II (I \? ?
I? EXISTING
t i l l I STREAM1
TEMP. UTILITY I / EXISTING To
0 IMPACT= S.F. OF BANK (TYP.) \
I PROPOS€D 1
PROPOSED 12" 20' UTILITY
'WATER MAIN ' Iq EASEMENT OP.
PROPOSED
-,,CONCRETE PERM. AD FILL
HEAD WALL IMPAC'k'(
-491 S.F.
BO L.F.
? FI
\t'
t
i
I
I
I
OSED 6" ? \\ PERM. IP2AP
\
MAIM IMPACT= 274,,
50 L.F.\
1 (2) 42" hCP APRON
PIPES ` CLASS "1\
t , ' \ \ \ "THICK
1 1 STEM ORARY G akoo \ 1
y HI ULAR
0 BRIDGE \"o
IMP?CT
1C? EXISTING \
1 1 1 11 WETLANDS % \ \ \ \
1 \
J I 101 1 r \X
? I I I I I ?
I I ? I
i I I I I I
1
40' 0 40' 80'
SCALE: I "=40' (Honz.)
PROPOSED
0 PROPOSED

PROPOSED ( OPOSED CONCR T E
RUAUWA
(;RAnF ED-WALIz-
P)

AniF
48" RCP

Nw
440.64
INV OUT
EXISTING
RAD POSED 62
SEWER MAIN 440.26 501
RI LF
RAP PAD

ROPOSEO-*
WATER MAIN
NOTE
I Or-
GRAD PROPOSED CULVE
Tr E RT PIPE BOTTOM
STING-DITCH

°
c.

I-
I-
-

0
O
?

0

0

0

0
10+00
11+00
12+00
IMPACTTOTALS
PE RMANENT IMPACTS
RIP-RAP S.F. 274
L.F. 50. STREAM
ROAD FILL S.F. 491
L.F. 80 STREAM
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
UTILITY S.F. 121
L.F. 20 STREAM
455
450
445
440
435
DATUM ELEV
430.00
O
N
ROADWAY CROSS SECTION
HORIZONTAL SCALE 1 =40
VERTICAL SCALE 1 11=4'

Sod < CnNronmcntal Conyultant? 0
z-
Lu n
11010 R- Ridge Rvsd
Ralcgh, NC 27614
Phone [phone] Z
LC
Ill
j Q
r
Z?u`lr
0 W Z?m
Qo

?
QZ
$-4
`.J _j
LZp
0
_j
Q?o?
?u
U
?(r-Zk Ig
L?IJ D e
APR X 2006 'k'S13/,':'Dtf a?11?i1Er?C U;;Cry ? .
? ? II
aa?
b
VICINITY
LocnnoN 1
o SCI ?; ??
s
NORTH
/tXISS'TIING ' Sod I 1 IO 10, R. cntai R JR tang
_ WETLANDS /? / ?? \ 1 { 1 l ven fLdge Road
1 ` Ral h, NC 2764
/ Il Phone [phone]
/ / ` ?? \ 1 I I VICINITY
TEMP. UTILITY
-- IMPACT= 121 S.F. '
20 L.F. - _ ` - - - PROPOSED y / \ 1 \ 1 4
-? CONCRETE CORE
`SLAB BRIDGE \ \? \
PROPOSED P,RCrP'OSED 12" CROSSINGS
- 60' ROW- WATER MAIN_ \ \ \ \ ?\ ° \ 1 \
?OROPOSED
20 UTILITY
------ _ \ \ / ` \EASEME T? TYP1
- . ..... \0\0 0
PROPOSED 6' TEMPORARY \ \ \ \ D ?k???
ORCE MAIN 1 ` l ` \ VEHICULAR \ \ \ \ D
I , WOOD BRIDGE \
TEh1P. UTI ITY \ ?NO'IMPACT ` \ \ APR X 2006
PROPOS D \ \ ImPAc \ \ \ \ \ ?EASEME P. ' I 3 L.P T=1 ; S.F. \ \ ?, , \\ \ \ \ \ t? '0 h' A Ta Q TALffy !CH
\?
\ \ \ \ EXISTING TOP 1 1 \ \
\ \ \ PROPOSED 8" OF BANK (TYP.) ,\ \
\ \ \ \ IRRIG \ION LIN? \ 1 1 EXISTING STREAM 1 1, ` \
40' 0 40' 80'
. .
Js I
SCALE: I "=40' (Honz.)
IMPACT TOTALS
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
UTILITY S.F. 6
L.F. 53 STREAM
U?Z
Z _

L N01
z tco

Lu u 4
_ n
Z2WQrm
O

? Z W z am
Q a?
QZ
o
rr
V -I- A
z „g
LZO n _ -

Z?z

s
s 2
p
C?
? ? II
I?pp F?
dl

NORTH
EXISTING TOP
OF BANK (TYP.)
\ 1
\
EXISTII JC,121CULVERTf_ ,
/EXISTING DIRT DOW
TEMP. UTIL?TY
IMPACT= 87?.F.
22 L.F. }
i
/
r?
/ TEMP. UTILITY
IMPACT=100 S.F.
st9 24 L.F. I
PROPOSED
1 50' ROW
1 ?
I

i
i

1
CON
l HEX
I
I I
1
t
)OS'PD
CRETE
D WAL P)
r ?yt29- 1v
j
6k
r
r I t ?t
A PROI
/
P QpOSED
F?RCE MAIN WITH
CAPPED END\
%ROPOSED 12"
WATER MAIN WITH
SED CAPPED END\
1 / / Y SLAB ??ET FORE
CRbSSING""
co \ \
PROPOSED
20\UTILITY
EASEMi NT(TYP.)
40' 0 40' 80'
SCALE: I "=40' (Honz.)
IMPACT TOTALS
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
UTILITY S.F.187
L.F. 46 STREAM

1
5-14 r----tal C -lt-te
1101 0 fl-c Ridge Rwd
Rnldgh. NC 27614
Phone [phone]
VICINITY
o ??ad? D
VZV
u
?
W
Z -
Z 2 ?,
-0? Wu4
ZuIQrn
0 z a?
ZZji
?5z
LZp
G4
J K m
Z
?U°u

® !?J F.
sd
v p?
®W
CC j
C) Q
W
W
rc
m

NORTH
I
&ISTIN
WETLAf I
DS
1 `

6-0- EC
u r^
t

//??? Soil ! Cnvironmental Consultanb
R O Ra.-cn fLdgc Road
10,R
NC 27614 ^ V Fz-
n U v
Z W h
Z

PROPOSEDCONC

ETE
BRIDGE ,
D?A Phone [phone]
L(I?`??7
AP O ... I'?' W wo
W <
0 W z as
ENDBENT 1
CORE SLAB BRID E
BACK FIL ] 1006 2
CROSSING L I, fN? _j z ?R
0
RIDGE- L
ENDBENT
BACK FILL r W

I
i Z > lzn
>
I I I ? h, 0
Q
' I I 1 I ? J
1
n (

(
1 I VICINITY
f I 1 I ® W

PROPO
R ED LOCATION
EXISTING OAD

GRADE Y

i 13

17
A
C)
GRADE
0 a
PROPOSED 1 "
WATER MAIN
PROPOSED 6"
RGE-MAI
® 6b ?'
u

6
S
® Q
TREAM BANK ei4?s
TO BANK

Q ? !!I
40' 0 40' 80'

5C LE: I "=40' (Horiz )
SC LE: I "=4' (Vertica )

N 00 N - N ?- - O f?
rn O O
am O 6
In N
(o O
(o p
r- v r
d
' d' r-

63 00 64 00 ( 65 -00 66- 00 67 00 NORTH
I
1 (?{ 11 ? I ? II 1 1 1 I
1 1 1 1 1?/ ? l ! `? 1 1 1 I1
11 \ I 1
I. 11 S I? A I 1 1 1 1? I
I I I I__ I
' i `? I I 1 PROpE???
I?` 1 ` ( , I 11 I
I 1 ?1 1 /
PEDEST IAN 1
{ I ` ' BRIDGE ROSSINGI
\ 1 ISEEDETAILSHEETI I I 11 1 /
i II ? \ ? 1? 1 1 ? JI 1 ? 1 1
I 1 ? 1? ?? I ? ?{ 1' 11
IEXISTIN 1 1
I ' ? ' ' ? ' ? 1 I ( I I l 1
W.ETLA DS (TYP.)
l1
?PROPq SED8" I I I 1
IRRIGATIO 1-14 1
?? \ V I TEMP. UT LITY 1 ?I I 1 I I
I i'
\ IMPACT= ?09 S.F. 1 1
21 L.F. I I 11 1 1 1
PROPL I Q20' UTISTY , // III I II ? I 1 ?
// III EXISTING
EASEMTT (TYP.) ?
(IYP.) I I I I
I 1 // ? II J I I I
I I /// ?' / I II 11
I I / ? ? i 1
I I/// ?{ I I it I
I ///---N 11 1 i II i I
40' 0 40' 80'
SCALE: I "=40' (Horiz.)
IMPACT TOTALS
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
UTILITY S.F.109
L.F. 21 STREAM
5-1 < Environmental C.-It-t,I
1 1010 P- R+dge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Phone [phone]
u1R@[gflp§[Ry
APR 12006
, s1,?;o rah ° IER cH
a9vow[ROD
APR 1 1 2006
OENR • WATER QUALiTY
zwol l:!q gTVMNATER @iw<CH
U?Z_
Z W
Z
"
-?
Z R
Wc
rm
O W Z u m'
Qo?
QZ
aZ "
G to
J??9
Z>z>

e
e?
s

G
u)
0n
0
son on
a
U) U)
w
3
H C
®rlk
NORTH
VICINITY
500
u ''^^ rrnn
., V v Z_
Z Z ii
Nm
W
-W
s
PROPOSE.D CONCRETE
ZWQrm
W z am
S-? Z Z Q
C? Za?
LZO
Z?z
490
f -i-I'll'I'll, QUo_
EXISTING
m
STREAM BANK
® ?.
JROP OSED 12" SEWER MAIN
480 IL
I?ie ? ? 4m
?
?
444
10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00
40' 0 40' 80'
5CALE: I "=40' (Horiz.) Rim? P 0M? D VICINITY
SCALE: 1 "=4' ertical
N )
LOCATION
APR 1 1 2006
DENR • WATER QUALITY
V01.R DSAf ?l STWtHATER BRANC H I
NORTH

B RIDGE
E NDBENT
So,
l <
En
?onmcntal Coro
u
ltants B
ACK FI
I
IO
I
O Ravcn fLdgc
R
oad
Raleigh, N
C
27
6
14

Phone
(91
9)
04
6-
5
900

RE-St
A RiDG

OS SING
6 IDGE
E DBENT
B CK FILL

GRA E
PROPOSED
ROADWAY
GRADE

TO ANK
PR POSED 6"

F.&h1Al

N
L0
O
N
r-
c0
-
O
d- ?
?
d- to c0 am ?t O
0) ?
00 ?
00 c
0 CO 1-: ?
00 00 0) 0)
"
E
cc 1.

r r ?
/ ? PROPO$ED
20- UTILITY
EASEME T (fYP.)
f
IN,
l ?\
,I
t
\

EXISTING
WETLANDS (TYP.)

PEDESTRIAN
BRIDGE CROSSING
SEE E D DETAIL SHEET
J
\ \ PROP03ED'8"
\ IRRIGATION LINE
/ T P,,P. UTILITY <
\ \
I1 PACT= 95 SIF--"
/ 25 L.F. /
EXISTING TOP / / ? \ \ \
OF BANK (TYP.)
1 I I \?
r l
1 r
I
? ?? I I I
? I I
1 I I
I I
40' 0 . 40' 80'
SCALE: I "=40' (Horiz.)
IMPACT TOTALS
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
UTILITY PL.F.1 .F.95
25 STREAM
50" 4 F.--t.1 C-lt-t?
I 10 1O Ra- Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Phone [phone]
VICINITY
D
APR 1 1 2006
11 r DENR j VATER QUALITY
"'34'?o ST01-1 t-iVER ERA,?CH
Z C n
^ Z
ZWQr
O ZWZaa
Q o
?
z
_j
?Z
s

Z>z ?
j uu
e
o
v y,?

G
0
? ?0
y
® II

CC
? 3
p' V
U) U)
W
Q,

NORTH
1 1 1\ 1 ?v ? I ?\ \ 1 ? 1 ? I
1 1 1 1\ III\` \? I ? ?\ I i i. I I I I
1 1 1 1 1 i t I IXISTINO 1 1 1 I I I I
1 1 1 1 1 11 l WETLANDS Op.) I I \
1 1 1 1 1 1? \ i 1 ? I I ? ? I \
1 1 1 1 1 1 \\ \ ? 1
1 1 1 1 \ 1 \\ `' ? \ \\ \ \\ \ \, 11 1
X 1 1 1 1 1 1 \\\ \\ \\ \\ \\ 1 1 \
1\ 1 1 1 11 1 1 11 \ ? \ \ \ \\ \ \ ?`\
`
11 1 ` 1 \ \ 11 \ \ tf ? \ \ \ \ \ PROPOSED 8"'\
1 \ 1 \ \ 11 \ BRIDGE CR NSS?NG \ \ IRRIGATIQN LINE\ \ ` \
SEE D 5 a, \ ?\ \ `
5od R CnvvonmenUl C.-lt-t"
1 1010 P--n FOdge Road
ft?1"h. NC 27614
Phone [phone]
VIr.INITY
`` 1 f ? I 11 1, \ ly ETAIL C ?\ \ - ?\ ? ? -' ? \ . ?\
I1 { PROPOS D
1 20" UTILI? \ \ \
EASEMEN*(TYP.) lqb
EXISTII'
OF P. \ \? \ \ \ \ \ D ???? l/ 15 D
I t 17 1 ,, \) I \ D
?Efp.'UTwTY \\ \ _ I I I` `\ \ APR 1 l 2006
I ; IMPACT=152S.F. \ \\ I t \ \ \ DENR•WAT`
23L,F. \li'z1UdUShriOSTA'cyti,RQUALITY
/? // ? 1 ' \\ \` \ I \ \ \ ,YATERBRAi'ICH
40' 0 40' 80'
SCALE: I "=40' (Horiz.)
IMPACT TOTALS
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
UTILITY S.F.152
L.F. 23 STREAM
11 Z CW
?..f..? L L r?i m
-?wS9
z ui
z am
O Q W
?
ZQom
\J Z"m
Lz
W R
O? L ?m
Q>z§$
-j ODU
s
e
G
® YO
OII
0

?
1d
u
a w
CC
C4
H v
W

NORTH
I I I 1 I? ///J I I I \1
I 1 ? >
I i I I \\? J f( ?? I I I
i I I I ? \ ?\ J III I I I I
I I ? I i II \\\J II _ I I I I.
ff I I I \\\/? EXISTING TOP I I
/ I \ I \ \ OF BANK (TYP.) I\ I
// ,, , \\ \ PEDESTRIAN y
\ \ BRIDGE CROSSING I
SEE DETAIL SHEET
PROPOSED 8" I
I PRQPOS`ED \\? IRRIGATION LINE I
\ 20' I?TILI? ? J f
\ EASEMENT (TYP.) J \ I _ - _ - J I
_ _ \ \- - - - - 1 TEMP,. UTi'LITY I
\ \IMPACT=1g2S.F.I I
\ \ ?O L.F. \
\ \ \ \ ?I I I I
II .
I
1\ J \\
1 1 J ?
40' 0 40' 80'
SCALE: I "=40' (Honz.)
IMPACT TOTALS
TEMPORARY IMPACTS
UTILITY S.F.162
L.F. 20 STREAM
1
1
1
I
LLI
Z ?
J \
(L /
IL/
/ IL
\
1
1
1
1
1
1

\
1
\
11
5.11 • r.-lZ7-tal Coroultant?
I I O I O Ravcn R,dge Road
Ralc?gh. NC 27614
Phone [phone]
VICINITY
Rf'4@207,9
APR 1 1 2006
DENR • WATER QUALITY
1', 7M OS R;0 STOMXNATER ER
Z_
Z
Z
2Em
n
W u4
ZIUQr
O zujZ3

o?
Q
Z
Q 2".
-J 0 Z
n ' n
IL L 0

W
O n
uO
wl
2
z z '
-j 6 0
-
e
s 42
0
U) 0
YI
® II

CC v
w
b
?
®r\4,h,
NORTH
15' CLEARING LIMIT
8' WIDE MAX
2" ASPHALT
6" GRAVEL
PEDESTRIAN / CART TRAIL SECTION
NT5
15CLEARING LIMIT
8' WIDE MAX
TREATED TIMBERS
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE SECTION
@ WETLAND CROSSING
NT5
8'-0" O.C. MT)
' ?? IGtGlly ABAi?
k S
1
=. .
R l ?
e
e la d
l nks;
Utilities • Pipeline
Construction
. Logging
Houso Moving
Portable
DOUBLE-TRACK ROAD MAT
Logging mats are 10' x
14' or 10'x16'.They lay
down in sections end to end
for roads and bridges, or
side by side for logging
decks. They are easy to
pick up and lay down with a
loader. Mats are picked up
at the end or in the middle.
Providing Quality Portable Road Mats
CONSTRUCTED MATH <
2"x L' OAK, BOLTED
TOGETHERYWTH to 112-BOLTS
Double-Track Mats & Deck Mats are:
• Portable
• Reusable
• Cost Effective
. Environmentally friendly
Stream Crossings
Logging Mats and Bridge
Mats are a Best
Management Practice
(BMP) for minimum
disturbance. They are
cheaper and easier to install
than culverts. Also, they do
not restrict flow, wash out,
or require putting foreign fill
material around culverts in a
stream.
Bridge I Crane Mats
Our 4' wide mats are
made with 8" to 12" oak
timbers with 1" bolts
available in 16' to 24'
lengths. Other sizes upon
request. They can be used
by themselves or with our
portable road mats laid on
top.
&Wf W W40her. 00- You Dawnl
TEMPORARY WETLAND CR055ING DETAIL
50" t CnHronmcntal C-Itontb
1101 O Ravcn 1L1gc Road
Ralcgh. NC 27614
Phone [phone]
@?o
o ? 12pp6
PPR 1 r
?pEN??p51Cf?
O

'r
X
cc
IL
W
¦
e
a
tJ
S
4
3:
U0Z_
ZZ L"
W n
V
Z ILJ
rm
ZWZas
(ZQdm
_j 0Zo
?Z
u
GHQ
Z>Z$>
?U°_
611
J
Fi
W
a

m?
V?p
ml
le
contact Info.

OW A T ?9PG
r
o Niiiw?osllwaw ?
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
May 23, 2006
Mr. Allen Harrington
The Parks At Meadowview, LLC
2214 Brawley School Road
Mooresville, NC 28117
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ Project # 06-0616
Chatham County
Subject Property: The Parks At Meadowview, LLC
Ut to Dry Creek & Brooks Creek [030604,16-36, WSIV, B, NSW]
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Harrington:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to
place fill within or otherwise impact 489 linear feet of perennial stream (250 linear feet
permanent impacts, 239 linear feet temporary impacts) to construct the proposed residential
subdivision, as described within your revised application dated May 15, 2006, and received by
the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on May 15, 2006. After reviewing your application,
we have decided that the impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification Number(s)
3374 and 3402 (GC3374 and GC3402). The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide
Permit(s) NW 12 and NW39, respectively, when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE). In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal,
state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to)
Erosion and Sediment Control, Non-discharge, and other regulations. Also, this'approval to
proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your
application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change
your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and
is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in
the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may
be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
401 Oversight/Express Review Permits Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state. nc.us/ncwetlands
One
N Carolina
Awmally
An Equal Opportunity/Afnnative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
a
The Parks At Meadowview, LLC
Page 2 of 3
May 23, 2006
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
Conditions of Certification:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and
general conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other
impacts are approved including incidental impacts:
Amount Approved Units _ Plan Location or Reference
Stream
Perennial 489 linear feet (If) of perennial stream
2501f permanent, 239 if feet temporary) PCN page 5 of 9
Sediment and Erosion Control:
2.. Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the
North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion
control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified
in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow, sites, and
waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits
associated with the project.
c. Sufficient materials required for stabilization and/or repair of erosion control
measures and stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times.
3. No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas
beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the 404/401 Permit Application. All
construction activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of
sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no
violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur;
4. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the
maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands
and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six
months of the date that the Division of Land Resources has released the project;
5. Protective Fencing - The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction
corridor within these boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked
The Parks At Meadowview, LLC
Page 3 of 3
May 23, 2006
with orange warning fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been
approved to infringe within the buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities
to ensure compliance with 15 NCAC 2H, Section .0500;
6. Deed Notifications - Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained
jurisdictional wetlands, waters and protective buffers ,in order to assure compliance for future
wetland, water and buffer impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting
any wetlands, waters and/or buffers approved for impact under this Certification Approval
and Authorization Certificate. A sample deed notification can be downloaded from the
401/Wetlands Unit web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. The text of the sample
deed notification may be modified as appropriate to suit to this project;
7. Culvert Installation
Culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream
profiles are not altered. Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section
dimensions, pattern, and longitudinal profile) must be maintained above and below
locations of each culvert. Culverts shall be designed and installed to allow for aquatic life
movement as well as to prevent head cutting of the streams. If any of the existing pipes are
or become perched, the appropriate stream grade shall be re-established or, if the pipes
installed in a perched manner, the pipes shall be removed and re-installed correctly.
Culvert(s) shall not be installed in such a manner that will cause aggradation or erosion of
the stream up or down stream of the culvert(s). Existing stream dimensions (including the
cross section dimensions, pattern and longitudinal profile) shall be maintained above and
below locations of each culvert.
Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands must be placed
below the elevation of the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater
than 48 inches, and 20 percent of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less
than 48 inches, to allow low flow passage of water and aquatic life. Design and placement
of culverts and other structures including temporary erosion control measures shall not be
conducted in a manner that may result in disequilibrium of wetlands or streambeds or
banks, adjacent to or upstream and down stream of the above structures. The applicant is
required to provide evidence that the equilibrium shall be maintained if requested in writing
by DWQ.
The establishment of native, woody vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization
techniques must be used where practicable instead of rip-rap or other bank hardening
methods. If riprap is necessary, it shall not be placed in the streambed, unless specifically
approved by the Division of Water Quality.
Installation of culverts in wetlands must ensure continuity of water movement and be
designed to adequately accommodate high water or flood conditions.
Upon completion of the project, the Applicant shall complete and return the enclosed
"Certificate of Completion" form to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the §401
A.
The Parks At Meadowview, LLC
Page 4 of 3
May 23, 2006
Certification has been completed. The responsible party shall complete the attached form
and return it to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality upon
completion of the project. Please send photographs upstream and downstream of each
culvert site to document correct installation along with the Certificate of Completion form.
8. Construction Stormwater Permit NCGO 10000
Upon the approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan issued by the Division
of Land Resources (DLR) or a DLR delegated local erosion and sedimentation control
program, an NPDES General stormwater permit (NCGO10000) administered by DWQ is
automatically issued to the project. This General Permit allows stormwater to be
discharged during land disturbing construction activities as stipulated by conditions in the
permit. If your project is covered by this permit [applicable to construction projects that
disturb one (1) or more acres], full compliance with permit conditions including the
sedimentation control plan, self-monitoring, record keeping and reporting requirements
are required. A copy of this permit and monitoring report forms may be found at
http: //h2o. enr. state. nc. us/su/Forms Documents. htm. -1
9. Compensatory Mitigation Using the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP)
Mitigation must be provided for the proposed impacts as specified in the table below. We
understand that you wish to make a payment to the Wetlands Restoration Fund
administered by the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) to meet this mitigation
requirement. This has been determined by the DWQ to be a suitable method to meet the
mitigation requirement. Until the EEP receives and clears your check (made payable to:
DENR - Ecosystem Enhancement Program Office), no impacts specified in this
Authorization Certificate shall occur. The EEP should be contacted at [phone] if
you have any questions concerning payment into a restoration fund. You have one month
from the date of this approval to make this payment. For accounting purposes, this
Authorization Certificate authorizes payment into the Wetlands Restoration Fund
to meet the following compensatory mitigation requirement:
Compensatory Mitigation Required River and Sub-basin Number
Stream 250 linear feet Cape Fear/03030002
Certificate of Completion:
10. Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or
applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to
return the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina
Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters
as depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may
result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed
t
The Parks At Meadowview, LLC
Page 5 of 3
May 23, 2006
impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this
Certification shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved
wetland or stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60
days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly or Ian McMillan in the
Central Office in Raleigh at 919-733-1786 or Alan Johnson in the DWQ Mooresville Regional
Office at 704-663-1699.
AWK/ m
Enclosures: GC 3374 and GC 3402
Sincerely,
/-7 Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
NCDWQ 401 WQC Summary of Permitted Impacts and Mitigation Requirements
Certificate of Completion
cc: Sean Clark, S&EC, P.A., 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 060616TheParksAtMeadowview(Chatham)401

?0F W ATF9Q Michael F. Easley, Governor
`O 0 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
7 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
p .? Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
401 Water Quality Certification
Summary of Permitted Impacts and Mitigation Requirements
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0500, The Parks At Meadowview, LLC has permission as outlined below to
impact 489 linear feet of perennial stream (250 linear feet permanent impacts, 239 linear feet temporary impacts) to
construct the proposed residential subdivision NC Highway 87 and Chatham County Road 1520 in Chatham
County. All activities associated with these authorized impacts must be conducted with the conditions listed in the
attached Permit transmittal letter. THIS PERMIT IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ATTACHMENTS. -
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS, ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
LOCATION: Pittsboro, NC
COUNTY Chatham
BASIN/ SUB BASIN Cape Fear/03030002
As required by 15A NCAC 2H.0500, and the conditions of this Permit, you are required to compensate for the above
impacts through the restoration, creation, enhancement or preservation of wetlands and surface waters as outlined
below prior to conducting any activities that impact or degrade the waters of the state.
Note: Acreage requirements proposed to be mitigated through the Ecosystem Enhancement Program must be
rounded to one-quarter acre increments and linear foot requirements must be rounded up to the nearest foot
according to 15 2R.0503(b).
Impacts Mitigation
250 linear feet of stream 250 linear feet of stream
In correspondence dated April 20, 2006, the EEP indicated that up to 250 linear feet of stream mitigation will be
conducted by EEP if necessary for the 401 Water Quality Certification and 404 Permit.
One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirement is through the payment of
a fee to the Wetlands Restoration Fund per NCAC 2R.0503. If you choose this option, please sign this form and
mail the form along with a copy of your 401 Certification or Buffer Approval to the Ecosystem Enhancement
Program at the address below. An invoice for the appropriate amount of payment will be sent to you upon receipt of
this form. PLEASE NOTE, THE ABOVE IMPACTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL YOU RECEIVE
NOTIFICATION THAT YOUR PAYMENT HAS BEEN PROCESSED BY THE ECOSYTEM ENHANCMENT
PROGRAM.
Signature Date
ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
1652 Mail Service Center
RALEIGH, N.C. 27699-1652
[phone]
Filename: 060616TheParksAtMeadowview(Chatham)101 _EEP
401 Oversight/Express Review Permits Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] I lntemet: http://h2o.enr. state. nc. us/ncwetlands
Narolina
om` C
Xa ura!!y
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
06- OLO I Le U?m COPY
Soil & Environmental Consultants, 77A
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com May 15, 2006
S&EC Project # 8682.W3
To:
US Army Corps of Engineers Division of Water Quality
Attn: Mr. Todd Tugwell Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd. 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250
Suite 120 -Raleigh, NC 27604
Raleigh, NC 27615

From: Sean Clark r7l
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614

Re: The Parks at Meadowview Amended PCN
Chatham CO, NC
Due to an oversight on our behalf, temporary stream impacts resulting from utility line placement
were not included on the orginal PCN submitted. The original impact maps and supplemental
information submitted on April 11, 2006 is correct. On behalf of the owner, The Parks at
Meadowview LLC., please find attached an amended application requesting written concurrence
from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) that the activities proposed below may proceed
under Nationwide Permit 12 & 39 and General Water Quality Certification 3374 & 3402. Please
contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or require additional information.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name The Parks at Meadowview
Project Type Residential Subdivision
Owner / Applicant The Parks at Meadowview, LLC
Count Chatham
Nearest Town Pittsboro
Water Body Name UTs to Brooks and D Creek
Basin / Sub-basin Cape Fear 03-03-002-HAW
Index Number 16-36
Class WS4V,B;NSW
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0.057
Wetland Impact acres : 0.0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.057
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 489
Total Impact to Buffers NA
Attachments:
• Amended Pre-construction Notification (PCN)
Application Form
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
P.- 17na)7'70-0a0C
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
P- MCI)
5d(1_R? ?S
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. O LO ` 06 l Lv
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 12 & 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), cli& bete, ? In
F Lt:j
E
II. Applicant Information
'd?Ay 1 5 20005
1. Owner/Applicant Information c 1 , R
Name: The Parks at Meadowview. LLC Vi Tuj J s
Mailing Address: Attn: Allen Harrington
2214 Brawley School Road
Mooresville NC 28117
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Sean Clark
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants. PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:[e-mail]
Page 1 of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: The Parks at Meadowview
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 9734-23-9527.000,9733-37-5526.000,9733-75-
0481.000
4. Location
County: Chatham Nearest Town: Pittsboro
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): The site is located north
of Pittsboro at a point +/-4,000 feet southeast of the junction of Dry Creek and NC Highway
87. The site is situated between NC Hi hway 87 and Chatham County Rd 1520. Please refer
to the attached Figures 1 and 2 for the project's location on a USGS topographic quadrangle
and the Chatham County Soil Survey maps, respectively.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 035°46'56.34"N, 079°14'22.30"W : 035°46'50.13"N,
079014'1 1.05"W
6. Property size (acres):
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT's to Dry Creek and Brooks Creek
8. River Basin: Cane Fear
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/mgps/.)
Page 2 of 9
Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is currents undeveloped and was previously owned
by International Paper. The Property was clear cut +/- 10 years ago. The site to the
immediate north is currents being, developed as a single-family residential golf course
community. Other adjacent parcels are forested in agriculture or are single-family homes.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project will be a single-family residential' subdivision with the typical roads
and utilities The proposed impacts are due to roads and utilities connecting the various
phases of the project to Hi way 87 Old Graham Road and the rest of the project. The
future lot la out and road corridors have been finalized and all efforts were made to
minimize and avoid any unnecessary impacts Voluntary riparian buffers as well as county
buffers were set in the site plan in order to further protect the integrity of the streams. Bridges
or open bottomed culverts were designed in order to keep the cumulative impacts within the
Nationwide Permit 39 thresholds and further minimize and avoid impacts. Heavy equipment
typical to this kind of work is to be used.
9. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the project is to construct The
Meadowview Subdivision and provide additional housing to meet the demand for the area.
IV. Prior Project History
if jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Permits have been issued on this property (previously known as Brooks Creek Subdivision) to
connect the northern Chapel Ridge Property to NC Highway 87 as per Chatham County's
requirements S&EC completed a detailed wetland delineation in October of 2004 to provide the
base information required for planning the residential subdivision. In October of 2004 a site
meeting was held with Mr. Todd Tu ell of the USACE to make "importance" calls on the two
stream features with ro osed im acts due to the previously mentioned road installation. A site
meeting was then held with Mr. Eric Kulz of the NCDWO on February 22, 2005 to make
perennial/intermittent determinations on the same two stream features. As a result of these
meetings the road was realigned so as to cross at a point upstream of the perennial/important
point A site meeting is being held with Mr Kulz on March 3 2005 to complete the perennial
calls on the rest of the property His findings are summarized in IPRRO #05-007. The remaining
surve?of the wetland boundaries is being completed and will be submitted for USACE approval
under se arate cover.
Page 3 of 9
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future pen-nits are known to be required at this time.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Impacts to intermittent/perennial
channels will result from the proposed installation of roads and required utilities. The
impacts are quantified and expounded on below
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year
Floodplain Nearest
Stream Impact
(acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) (yes/no) (linear feet)
NA NA NA NA NA NA
Total Wetland Impact (acres) NA
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: +/- 15
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Page 4 of 9
Stream Impact Perennial Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact or Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma Intermittent Before Impact linear feet acres
Road Crossing #1 UT to Brooks Creek Culvert / Rip-Rap Perennial 4
42 120' 012
(NWP 39) (Permanent) . .
Road Crossing #1 UT to Brooks Creek Utility Perennial 4
42 31' 003
(NWP 12) (Temporary) . .
Road Crossing #2 UT to Brooks Creek Culvert / Rip-Rap Perennial 5
88 130' 017
(NWP 39 (Permanent) . .
Road Crossing ssi j #2 UT to Brooks Creek Utility Perennial 6
05 20' 002
12 (T . .
Bridge Crossing #1
UT to Brooks Creek Utility
Perennial
6
00
53'
007
(NWP 12) (Temporary) .
Bridge 12
g #2 UT to Brooks Creek Utility Perennial 5
00 46' 004
) T . .
Ped. Crossing #1 UT to Dry Creek Utility/Foot Bridge perennial 5.00 21' 003
(NWP 12) (Temporary) .
Ped. Crossing #2 UT to Dry Creek Utility/Foot Bridge Perennial 4.00 25' 002
(NWP 12) (Temporary) .
Ped. Crossing #3 UT to Brooks Creek Util
Bridge Perennial 5
00 23' 003
Tem or) . .
Ped. Crossing #4 UT to Brooks Creek Util
t Bridge
o Perennial 00
8 20' 004
Tem
o . .
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 489* .057
* Of the 489 LF only 250 LF is permanent
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
indicate on ma ocean, etc. acres
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Open Water Impact (acres) N/A
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the proiect:
Stream Impact (acres): .057
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) .057
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 489
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ® Yes ? No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
No impacts are proposed to isolated waters.
Page 5 of 9
Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Impacts have been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Road crossings
have been planned at perpendicular angles to stream flow. Streams are not crossed multiple
times by roads. Out of four proposed road crossings, two propose the use of bridges. Pedestrian
trials also use bridges when crossing, streams. Temporary Impacts resulting from utility line
installations were planned for locations where wetlands did not exist to further avoid additional
impacts(eg pedestrian crossings 1,2, 3 and 4).
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
Page 6 of 9
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnngide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited.to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Because there are no impacts to wetlands no wetland mitigation is proposed Impacts to
perennial streams typically do require mitigation therefore stream mitigation for the 250
linear feet is proposed. If mitigation is required we propose that payment be made to the
NCEEP
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 250
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
Page 7 of 9
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan, All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify, )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
* Impact Required
Zone Multiplier
1 NA 3 (2 for Catawba) NA
2 NA 1.5 NA
Total NA NA
* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B.0242 or.0244, or.0260.
This site is within the Cape Fear River Basin. which does not have NC-DWO regulated
riparian buffers.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
1.) Homesites 6,000,000 s.f.
2.) Roadways 1,777,248 s.f.
3.) Water Booster Station 4,000 s.f
4.) Amenities 161,172 s.f.
5.) Sidewalks and Trials 275,000 s.f.
Page 8 of 9
Total Impervious 8,217,420 s.f. = 23.8%
Total Acreage of Site 34,547,436 s.f
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available-capacity of the subject facility.
The project will tie into an existing treatment facility in the area
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes El No ® If
yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:-
We have reviewed the "DRAFT Internal Policy Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality
Certification and Isolated Wetland Prop-rams" document prepared by the NC Division of Water
Quality on October 3, 2002, version 1.6. The draft states that most residential subdivisions are
unlikelv to cause cumulative impacts. The Parks at Meadowview does not meet any of the three
criteria of private projects that can clearly result in cumulative impacts We anticipate that you
will advise us if a qualitative or quantitative impact analysis is required.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Applican Agent' Signature Date
(Agent's signature is va id only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
May 4, 2006
S&EC Project #8682.W3
DWQ Project #06-0616
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Attn: Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
o
Fro
Re: Reply to the Division of Water Quality's Request for More Information '
The Parks at Meadowview, LLC MAY 4 2006
Pittsboro, Chatham County, NC
. . WATER
WETUWDSANDSO.'WWTM BRAXH
Ms. Karoly:
The purpose of this letter is to respond to your Request for More Information letter requesting
further information. The original questions/requests are copied below as they appear on the April
24, 2006 letter and are then followed by our response to each.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Please provide documentation from the NCEEP indicating their willingness to accept
your request to purchase stream mitigation.credit to mitigate for the proposed
perennial stream impacts listed in your PCN application per section VIII, No. 1.
Attached is the letter from the Ecosystem Enhancement Program accepting 250 linear feet of
warm stream (dated April 20, 2006)
2. Please provide a location map for the project.
An attached location map has been provided.
3. Please provide full plan sheets for the Overall Impact Map.
An Overall Impact Map on a 24 x 36 size map is attached for your review. Please note that these
maps were sent to your office the day after the initial submittal (please see attached courier
ticket).
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office: .
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord,. NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
4(?
COPY
Soil. & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
May 4, 2006
S&EC Project # 8682.W3
We'anticipate that this answers all of the DWQ's questions in order to complete the final review
process for a 401 Water Quality Certification. If you have any further questions or any additional
explanation is needed, please don't hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Sean Clark
Environmental Specialist
CC:
Mr. Todd Tugwell (USACE)
Attachments:
1) Ecosystem Enhancement Program Acceptance letter (dated April 20, 2006)
2) Location Map
3) Overall Impact Map (24 x 36)
2
Sean Clark
S&EC PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
J-L.J F -L014V UI
tenr
PROGRAM
April 20, 2006
Project: The Parks at Meadowview County: Chatham
1-164 roz U-Zb5 l
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NC EEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Cemifiication within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send
copies of the 404/40I/CAMA permits to NC EEP. Once NC EEiP receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or the 401
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
` TVA "'"Ma Wetlands
Cataloging (Acres) Stream
Buffer ffer
Unit (Linear Feet) Zone 1 2
Ri avian Non-Ri Arian Coastal Marsh Cold (Sq. Ft.TZ:one
1~t.)
Cape Fear 0 n Cool Warm
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted impacts
up to a 2;1 ratio, (buffers, Zone 1 at a 3:1 ratio and Zone 2 at a 1.5:1 ratio).
of the compensatory
mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 Permit and/or 401 Water QuThe ality Certifica onl and/or CAMA Permit. The
mitigation will be performed in iccordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Chris Mankoff at [phone].
Sincerely,
o J
Z 1' ?/G'
Gilmore, PE
CC: Cyndi I-aroly, Wetlands/401 Unit Director
Todd T ugwell, USACE - Raleigh
Eric Kulz, DWQ Regional Office - Raleigh
File
)Wtor'
E ... Pro" 0" Stag MA
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 /Www.nceep.net

g
lk? E.tia

r n43
40
'
?e a • /«e ?'. ? ? v p °9 wERS •M" i .; S c'\ g ry 5°t ? 2
? 5i 1.
? a
1 s
\ ,? .
r o 1

co?

\ i Cp / _t r 9 ) 1
?

man
"K MU
r
` \
•
:-
? -
/
1
I` wa Rull w 3 ? ?. ? ,
- r
y
t- ?
z -

-3 EVERFH JO
C .
"-Maw f
K :..
k
.
w - ?' r '• •?. --? 7-s:?cra <.
,iL •
? 7°n 'L? i ? ?` ? I
«
wren , `<
_r `
r

Y' ? ..su AREA
.
E
_ -- fia j? 'p - ,`ExrcabRd?nuke

) 8 7

902 r s, qp •$ 0 1 \ rtj HOPE GAME -.'.
i
of VLST
C (?..
tEA
? ? ` `? z? ,?-? ; , .. ?-? ,•
p -
`;tit` '1
„

l . 902
1 1 ? I

RETT DAN @4w - S
to
\. ^
B
?? ,11
r
`
'.
`b?
`?
E ?.? '` .s. ; `
t? ?
1
?
... r ? ?
r
75
S! 1
,
?
- .a'-Zr 4 •. M°'1' `C C
E
; u

f
?
'? ? ,
eLo 3
- 1 ? _

.ff
133°
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
t]C Division of Water Quality
Iran M Invoice Type Date Reference
10851 04112006 Invoice 04/11/06 #8682.W3 Permit App.
Check Nuc,ber:
Date: 4/11/2006 Check Amt:
Balance Discount
$475.00 $0.00
P@20WIE,
APR 1 12006
DENR - WATER QUALITy
tic VX3 AND STOir' A1ATER Er' 1,01
001047
1047
$475.00
Pay iumount
$475.00
© omp e'e ems , an so comp e e ur
em 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ? Agent
® rint your name and address on the reverse ,addressee
so that we can return the card to you. B. Received by (Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery
V Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
D. Is delivery address different from item 17 ? Yes
c o dressed to: If YES, enter delivery address below: ? No
Mr. Allen Harrington
The Parks At Meadoxwiew LLC
2214 Brawley School Road
Mooresville,NC 28117
DWQ4 06-0616-Chatham
c a um er
3. Service Type
Certfed MO press Mail
Reglstered Return Receipt for Merchandise
? Insured Mail ? C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) [
orm , e ru omest c eturn ece p 102595-02-M-1540
UNITED STATES.POST +? S R%'1eFE c '
Postage & Fees Paid
s. S.l" e?-a l C• ?J U ..3 S' ti K .?. '?"'^h•.^+a^•?" 1 c P?ff)11t .?
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight/Express Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
._ . ???=: _: _: !„1,!1,,,1,1!„II,,,,!„I„!?I„1,1,11,,,,11„1,1,1!,,,,,11:I
_ _ _ _
/r A v'~~~'r k ~ r x * i " x
~ >i ' x r ~ r x ' A ~X x, ~ Y
~ x . ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ , 4~x'~ xx K h r: t
~ x- _ xXx NOTE. SEE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE SECTION
/ ~ . x - ~
t'~ 'v ~ ~x J x I / - , /(`T , 1 ^ ~ x~r, U
ti f r°+~ 1., k x ; I ~ 1 ~trf^~ x rk ~ ~ 'x x'` ~ 1~ l ~ { x~ k `y ~`4 _ ~
. 1 i A X .i I Consultants ~ Soil ~ >=nvironmenta 1' I l I I O I O Raven Ridge Road LLJ ~
a „ ~ ~ ~v .X x~~~k , ; ~ _ ~ ,i x ~ Raleigh, NC 276 I -4 ~ ~ ~ Phone (9 ! 9) 8~F6-0900 N ~
I 1~ ~ ~~~,f h'~;x ~t ,s v~ W ~ ~
~ k, `'x r ~ ;1 ; , r' ~ z~
r x ' Y~' ~ I. d" ~ / ~ i ~1 x'~ ' ~ WQ m r z
' h''>r Z u ~
j k y Y~, k Q 0 4?
~ I I z h,x,~~ ~ / I v i~'1 i T ~'1.~ ~ `~x~r\ 1 1 C ~ ~ ~ 'k ~ L x; X~ ' 1 1 ~ ~
/ ~ - ~ l ~ Xr,~t~ ( k x ~ ~ ~~xr„ ` MAXIMUM POTENTIAL
~ ,t , i j 1 . ~~kr x ; 1 1 ~ a i`
~ ~ , z n~ ~ ! ' y~. ~;;c, r lMPERV~OUS CALCULATION _ r I 3
1 ~ II ,,.~''.1 > ~~~',Y ~ +Kc ta~~n., V i~ 'X , 7;'^i 1 ~ ~ I`o ~ k'1; 1
I 1 + x ' Y. x~'~ ~ I n, W
'I i~ v~ 11 x k >J I ~ I ~ x x > ~ //1\ J ~ ~ / ~ 1 1 Impervlous ~ \ 1 1 LIL ~ y
,I I 1, 1~:,~ ~ / x ~'a , k. X;l'~ ~v ~ ~ d i ~r ~ l J l~ Lots Area '.Total ~ ~ ~
~ ~ 1, ~ o
I II' t iK,l~,;'~' ~I I , X"x 1 6001 10,000 6,000,000 s.f. ~ > 1 z O
I ~T/~`f' f. ,J ~ a/ f l,~ ~ ~ 0
f 1I ~i r. / I ~i I Item Impervious U
y K ° F Area ~ ~ ~1 1
I~~1 ~'~~~~1 ' I 1 f ~,~.;-1 t,,..~~,,..,.~:; 1~ I I` ' ~ . I 1
1 ~ r ~ - . 1 Homesites 6,000,000 s.f. ~ 1 2 Roadways 1;777,248 s f.
;match~ne ~ ~ _ 1. ~ `i 1 3 'Water Booster Pum Sta. 4.000 s.f. P
I 1 w's ~ ~ ~ ,I ~ I x ~ 4 Amenity 161;172 s.f
`i , / 1 1 5 Sidewalks & Trails 275,000 s.f. ' ~ \ r 1
\ / ~ 1. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 6,217,420 sf.
.I; 1
II I lid~ I,~ ~i, ~+y-.. / A f Y, ~I . ~-~Ij ~''vl , , , I,
J / ~ / ~ ~ I, 1 1 .TOTAL TRACT AREA 793.t'acres ' I
I r / 1 1 34 547 436 s.f. / ~ I ~ ; / I
I tiq G ,^k x\k ~ - - a ~ ~k ~ :II I X ~ 1 ~ 11
1 ~ x 1 1 1 x ~ ~ \ _ i
~ ~ n k .~:°jY I lI ~ ~ l k I u ~ ! ' ~ ~ ~ 1
t 8 'I 4 , ~ ~ ~ , ~ , I 6 ,.t ll r-C-' I ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ / j tl / ~ 1 1 IMPERVIOUS PERCENTAGE 23.6 % ~
i 1 1 h ~ I I Qt' ` 1
1 ~ l 1 ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ i CT _
I, I _ 5 / S, . ~ ~Yc"'~
/ / / ~ 1 1 / 'J _ ~,y
~ ~ ~ ~ I~ I I I 'V `I S ~ ^5 ~1 t 1 I v ~ 1 I ~ ~ 1 so sa i$ ~ VU 1 / / / 1 ~
x. _ 1- _ ~ - 1 ~ 1 1
f__---- , ~ ~ - - ~ ~ r ~ ~ - ~ - - 1 ~ x, v / v t v v w
fy 5a0'l ~M ' S20~ ,0 1 _ ~i i ~ i~ I_ ~ 1 -
/ s',,rk ,XX r j~ 1 I _ v ~ 3r ~ ~ ~ ,
1 / I \ l ~-~J --SSA. n / 4 i ~20•r- x ~ ~ Q ~ 1 1 ' I i I h ~„za _ I 1 1 \ ~ ~
o ~0 1 \a ~ ; I ,fir i ~ ~
U u Ids % ° tl ~ ~r 1\ I\ I s5°', ~ ~ / J~'~.: y, \ _ .-lu - C ~g ~..1- 5 , 'P_ , , / 1 ~ 1 z K ;t' ° 1 1
v I i ~ . ~ v r A' I
, !1 _ / I r 1 , I ~ ~ II i I 1 i ~J 1 1
_ J
/ I 1 t ~ ~ / Xr/, , I 1 , v i I / I ,nom/ r,v 15 ~ t F. ~ ~ ~
1 r 11 1 / i/ ~ I , I 1 ~dz - 1~ I I:/, 1 I 11 I~ 1 1
1 ~ / ` ~ I ~ ~ l~ - 5' r ~ ~ ~ ~~1 1 I 30' CESS EASEMENT ! /D!'~ ~ I a~ - ~ ~ ~ i I
1 - _ T' I V ' ~ , / ~ ~ ~ - P~ 1 ASP PLAT SLIDE ~ ' I ~ r' ! ~ 1 1 1~.
1 1 001- 24 hl I I szav o i 1 2 s I I ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 - I ~ ; , I ni 1 ' O 1 I I
1 , ~ ~ , ! / ~1 , I ~ 1 I I i 11
1 1 ~ r`5 / i i\ _^IY~ j~ a ` / I ~ , I I 1 11 N ' I j ~
i 1
C 1/ % / \ , ~ ,j 1l / 8 i ~ 1 O~ D n._ i _ 1 ~V~
- - ~ • 1 1 ~
1 ~ _ v ~ _ ~ w i 1 N ; r, ~ v 1 ~ 1 I~ ~ v _ V - , , DN _ L n
I ~ ~ I i i / / I / I j / i X h ,y~
1 / _ ~ / 1 ~ f ~ v / ~ ~ I ~ II I / / 1 ' / / 1 ~ I\ I \ ~ T1 / X \ ~ ~ 1 1 N
~ > / 1 , s , ` ~ X ~ ~o N ~ ~ I ~
1 ~ ' / I ~ / ~ ' ~ , X t 1 1 I l ,5x / / ~ I ll / - s ~ I 1 ~ ! ~r \ a / T X I 0 I lv
II I ~ I I ~I ~ I - ~ J / / j ° 1v ~ I I ° vv I
1 1 I I / II 1 1 , I 1 ~ 1 1
1 I I •M1 i _ .~f ~ 'fi J i - ~ ~ i I o /i/ / ; / 1 / , o
i 11
1 0l rv vv ~ ti- . ice' ~ __^5 1 / !I l i
I 1 ~ h v / / i I - / I / ~ I ~ X 1 1 t I ~ '1 ~I 'I ~ S ~ ~ I / / ~ ~ XX I- • X 11 , 1 C~
I h / l ' / I/ 1 1 ~ ~
1 I ~ n i5 % / - - i~ ~ ~r~ 1 ~ 1 / t / 1 w , ~
/ i / ~ X III 1 y\
1 ~ G-` ~ I 1 / 1 ! ~ 0 i 1
\ ,I
\ \ \ / \ 1 11~ 1 \ VO '!0 1 I I ` rl ~ ~ ~ to - O to l to
/ / III ~ 1 _5~\.. I ~ / I ^ ` -570-~ \ ~1 6`~`~ ~ - \ ~ 1 ~ , r> 1 if ~ ~ 1 ~ i I ~
I I r,
- 5 / _ i7 \ ~ 55p 1 \ 1 I 1 / 1 / 1 - \ \ \ s I d I \ 1 I r \ ~i I l_ I - \ 1 ~ I ~ l / ~ 1
/ ~ 1 ~ I I I IV A I I f ~v A ~t I I I V Ih i \ ` I 0 1 I ; Q ~ % ~
_ \ I 1 II 1 J~ / \ \ \ `\l / / ! I I ~ I /
\ V l ~1 _ / / / ~ / I ? \ g ~1 ~ -..1_..___~__.._L_ ~arP----'~ z I ~ / _
r / I I / I / ~ ~ A ~ 1 / / I ~ / /
I. : /1 1 - ~i 5~ I i p~~ I I I I / / 5M1 v I / 1 I ~ ~ I l 1 I I v ifV,',p..
/ 1 / ~ _ ~~~~_^/~1 ~ I I ~ ~w \ i I S I t '+x\'
' ~ / IA / ~ ~ / / I 1~../ I l ~ 1
I 1 ~ ~ h / ~ k \ 1 ~ 1 I \ r~ 1
1 ~ n f' / / ~ \ _ ~ I r i a ~ i I ~ ~,p~--- ~ / I
/ \ i ~ I I ~ `r 0 - I ~ (1
_ I l I li. ~ A1~IIIIIV VIIIII IIR.
EXISTING LOGGING TEMP. UTILITY
I \ ~
ROAD CROSSING IMPACT/ PEDESTRIAN ' - A o-- I 1 }
1 1 1 ~tl ACO~ -AbO r
CROSSING #3 k -Al ~ 10 / / ~ l I I 1 ,jA ~I
IMPACT TOTALS c- - 4ig \
PERMANENT IMPACTS
01 1 1
TOTAL RIP-RAP S. F. 499 WETLAND NORT~l
L. F. 108 STREAM r `y 0 I ~Y
TOTAL ROAD FILL S. F. 796 WETLAND NOTE: A°p P
L.F. 142 STREAM
p \ - 1 AAO.-~ O
COMBINED TOTAL S.F. 1 295 WETLAND BUFFERS PER CHATHAM COUNTY
L.F. 250 STREAM WATERSHED PROTECTION ORDINANCE
TEMPORARY IMPACTS 45a o 450' 90a r _
TOTAL UTILITY S.F. 1 249 WETLAND ~ VOLUNTEER BUFFERS PER PLANNED UNIT scnLe: 1'=450
L.F. 239 STREAM

i x t'\,' ~ ~ ~
J x~ ~~r ~ ,x /n.
x.~ ~ ~F i ~ > ~x x ~ }r lY ~ X
a a ~ ~ fib, NOTE: SEE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE SECTION
t 1 ~ ~ , ~ ~ ,
~l .A F ~ - I:A' 1 . X ~X U
r~,,,.~, ~ r A Y~~+ IXXX _ ~
Soil E Environmental Consultants ~ ~ - 1I O I O r2aven Ridge Road W-
Raleigh, NC 276 I ~F ~ r Phone (91 9) 8~F6-5900 ~ N ~
k, - W ~ ~
/ , `x ~cr .r ~ I ~ r a•.~ , ~ z IIIIII ~
/A 1 1 W Q °m
x\ ? ) / / Z ~m
I ~ : X a j w~ 1 YY, ri _ / r Q 00
/ 1 1 ~ x " x ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~
I I 1 ~ ~ ;,~xxx. ~ 1 I 1, ) ~;1~, MAXIMUM POTENTIAL
,~y J r_ '1'" ~ x ~ ~ / ~,~r^h~,~ 1 z ~ O
I I C~ ~ ` x ~ , ,r , I ~ O " . k,. " IMPERVIOUS CALCULATION I~
.,x
I \ I it ~ 1 x~?~~Y. \ i ~i. Y~ ~ F ~ . ~ A U m ' _ W
1 vv r'~ ~ 11 O iX,,;>;~/ I I I I v a x, y ~ I; 'r X T~,Y X , ~ ~ - ! ~ ~ \ ~ 1 Impervious i ~ ~ m
I ~ ~ s ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `t'ry. j i. T: n J ~ Lots Area .Total ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~
i 1 ~`.X I I 1 ~ \ I r ++nn 0 - r U1 0
;f"~ r ~ 600 10,000 6,000,000 's.f. o ~ ~ r' z
~X C t. R~ J I _ - / ~ r O - ~ r
1 x ~ 1 ~ i I Item Im erwous J . P U
\ Y i 4l` ~ I I Area
I `i v , 1 lk, j ~ I' Ir ~ 'r
1 Homesites 6,000;D00 s f ~ ' 2 Roadwa s 1.777.248 s f
;match~r?e ~ / 1 v ~ /I I11 , Y / VI 1 3 'Water Booster Pump Sta. 4,000 s f
~ 4 .Amenity 161,172 s f i
1 ~:t ~ ;i / 1 5 Sidewalks & Trails 275,000 s.f
' \ ~ ~ ,1 I ~ TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 8 217 420 s.f.
jl 1 t., K~.~ is I, ~ I, ' ~
1~1 _ , I ~ % / l ~ j I l
~ ~ I 1 1 TOTAL TRACT AREA 793.1 .acres
~ I I 1 1 ' 34 547 436 sf. V ~ / f I ~
1 ~a ~ i ~ k ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / I 1 1 ~ I
1~. I .Y/ „ ~ q 1 ~ ~ ~ •1 ~ •
1 ~ rr' ~I ; ; i I I ~ ~ ~ 1
1tl ,,:r'~J I ~ / ~ / ~I l ~ ~ ~ U i 1 IMPERVIOUS PERCENTAGE 23.8 ¦ / ,
1 ~ / n / 1/ _ I ~ ~ . I .I II ~ 5` J
I ,,1, II I ~ ! -1 , r S ~ 1 1 _
1 170 I 1 ~ ~ I 11 \ 1\ ~r \ x ~ , r
` i \ ~ \ `x i ~ ~ o~ ~ I I I I ~ - ' ` 1 1 -
1 1 \ ~ I \ I 'V~ ~ 1 `1 sso 'swr r X55 ~ - ,55 ~
~1 l ' q v ~ ~V 1 i i 1 v
y s
1 % ~ -500 , ' 1 A. ~ i ~ ~ 1 A _ 5o0'r rb ,5'~^ i° s2o~ "0 1 1
/ \ ~ 1 520-- X , I Q ~ 1 1 6 ~
~ i I / ~ ~~520-- 1 1 \ ' \ r
0 c20 ( ~ .0 ~~m ~ ~ 2 I
1 1 I ~ ~ 1 I 1!`~ ~ / ~ / - ~ it y~ ~ ~ I I \ / ~ ! 3y / I h i L'' / 1 1 ~ 1
c~° / I ! 1
/ o (1 I 1 ~ 1 I ! I / I I 1 ~ i v 1 / ~ 11
_ 1
1 11 j I !I I I 10 r-r ~ ~ 6` r ~ :fl l ~ I V I _ r r~ I ~ \ 11 , , ~ ~ ~ti-- ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ a ~I 7° 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ `
i r rr I 1 v ~ y is x T r ~
1 I % / / I ~s r ~ 1 1 I i v vA A 1~. - I 1~ i 1 I I, ~ 1
A MENT ~ ~ / / ~ ~~a, r f 'r~`=~^-',r---- _ r I' >a I 30' CESS E SE ~ ~ _ 1 , I y 1 ~ ~ ~ I - ~ ~ ~'r ~ I / ` ~ I I ~ , 0
1 ASP PLOT SLIDE - 1 1 ~ r 5~v r{~, A~ i ~ I ~'T- ~ i ~ 1 2001- 24 ~ I ~ 1 1 y' / ~ .~,o- 1 ` o 1 ) I ~ 1~
I I Y,.- ~ ~ - ' j ~ - l I„ r I 0 I . ~ ; , ~ .acn
1 1 1' I / r / ' rr 1 r 1 ( / ~ / 'LO' ~ r 1 r / ~ / / I I I ~ , , - ~ I ; 1
I ~ \ 1 I ~ ' 1 ~
1 I ~ ~
_ ~ r zcn
V ~ I 1 1 \ L I / 1 _ I - I 0 I _.J 1 1
1 i i ~ 1. / II I I 1 .I -tr I ~0,/ ,r..-' ~ ) l ~ I I ~ t`' r t I _ DN n - ~ I ; o ~O
/ 1 t r \ I . 1 l 1 / - ~ 1 I v I - 1 1 I I / /
1 1 1 1 ~ v / >C / / , 1 . 1 I ~ / 1 0 1 1 /V ' s ~GI N
1 / / / ~ I r ~ / \ S ~ i / ~ 1 ~ s ~ 1 v I i Q 1 1
1 l 2 .i I ~ )b 1 1 ~ a v ~ - / t 1 N / \ r I 'I i ° 1 1 u
v I % , , / ~ 1v / / / / 1 I 1 II / ~ ~ I , 1 ~ ~i \ I 1 1 1 , I / I / ;i _ I ~ /i ~ v v i
0 1~
I - /0v?, ~ ~r I I r d:~ / / ~ I ~ a ~ I i 11 O Q
1 v I i i~ v -'S ~ v n 1 / t l y
I / I 1 li ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~ 1 / 1 ~ y... i j 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ - y~ YC ?~,k I- -
1 1 I I I v I i 1 ' 1 1 / I ~ / ~i - 1 ~ r' ^ 1 C~ 11 " i, , 1
1 I n ,5 / - - ~ ~ ~ C
/ 1 c 1 / - 1 ~ \ ~ 1 11 II ~ 1 1
\ ~ / ~ / \ 1 / / i. 3i7 I i y ~ ~ ~ Q
kh ~ I 1
\ ~ l r~ / .A°A 1 ~ I I ,l I
/ 1 I! 1 ~ ~ 1 I k 1'~
1 `'CO) r \ 1590.___; 1 1 \ ~ i 1 0 ~ I I' i l 0 ' i I
1
/ h\ s I b I 1X I r / ~ r f~ 1 r r I.;~r,. I ~ i. I ~ 1f
I 1 I 1 Ir I I \1 1\ II 1\\ ~ / ;111 ~r'~ ~i I i ~ .•,,r ~ k~.~
V ~ I v, j I j lI I I s~ ~v I / v l !1 ~ ~ i I I 1 ~ 1 1~ R ~etP- , I ?d T
` \ t i ^L ~ - 0"- - - i
~y,'>, - - ---~i--al -Q= ---7- o ~ / . rr abr. ` ,
rl / r ~ h~ / % I I 1 / / I r_ 500 r. t >P ! ~ 1 / 1 s, e I / 1 1 1 I l S'`~
_ is , ~`>..o r' Il I~_~ 1 , AtA / A / A i ~ AI i_'
r l -~i~ ' o ` ' I I I~

.i f ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ - I / I I r D
r ~ . i `r . ~ i - I / ~ ~ 9, ` o I ~ I I ~ ,.,b ~ 1 i ! 1
I I a ~ ~ I / I ~ 0 !
• ~ I I I~ - - - r ,
I 1 I I I - 8 ` 0
- i I I a I I
0' / l I ~ I ...I
T TOTALS IMPAC
r- ~ `I _ 1 f
PERMANENTIMPACTS ~ 0 i \ - ~ o I .I ~ /f I i
TOTAL RIP-RAP S.F. 499 WETLAND I ~h I I i_eW' ~p 'I ~ _ i 1'I f ~
L.F. 108 STREAM I o - ~ ~ I
1
TnTei Rnen Fu i s_F_ 796 WETLAND
1 I i r 7
. L.F. 142 STREAM NOTE:
COMBINED TOTAL S.F. 1 295 WETLAND BUFFERS PER CHATHAM COUNTY i II ~o ~V I _ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1
I I ` ,
L.F. 250 STREAM WATERSHED PROTECTION ORDINANCE ~ - - - - -..J_ t ` O r ! 1 a / ,
TEMPORARY IMPACTS asa o 450' soo,
TOTAL UTILITY LL.F 1 249 WETWND
239 STREAM VOLUNTEER BUFFERS PER PLANNED UNIT scn~: 1"=450'