Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout_Coal Pile Assessment Work Plan TM_FINAL_20181113,(VIP synTerra Date: To: Cc: From: November 13, 2018 Ryan Czop (Duke Energy) TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM File: 1026.103.43 John Toepfer and Andrew Shull (Duke Energy), Kathy Webb (SynTerra) Chris Suttell Subject: Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant Coal Pile Assessment Work Plan Introduction Duke Energy Progress, LLC (Duke Energy) owns and operates the Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant (Plant or Site) in Moncure, Chatham County, North Carolina. The Site is a former coal-fired electrical power generation facility located on approximately 900 acres. Groundwater and soil assessment activities proposed for the former coal storage area (coal pile) are described herein. Regulatory Background In 2014, The North Carolina General Assembly passed the Coal Ash Management Act (CAMA). CAMA requires owners of a coal combustion residuals (CCR) surface impoundment to conduct detailed assessment of site groundwater within and surrounding the CCR surface impoundments. Primary sources of CCR-related constituents were identified during the Comprehensive Site Assessment (CSA) for CAMA. Those sources are five ash basins, referred to by the date of construction: 1956, 1963, 1970, 1978, and 1985. Groundwater monitoring wells were installed north, west, and south of the coal pile during CAMA-associated fieldwork. Boron, an inorganic constituent, is commonly used as an indicator of CCR impacts to groundwater. Groundwater sampling results from the wells near the coal pile did not indicate elevated concentrations of boron. However, data indicate the former coal pile - area soils may be a potential additional source of inorganic constituents such as sulfate and TDS to groundwater. Station Description Power production began at the Cape Fear Plant in 1923. Generation units were retired in 2012 and have been decommissioned. Coal is no longer stored on -Site. The former coal pile was removed in approximately 2013. Aerial photographs dating back to 1950 Page 1 of 3 P:\Duke Energy Progress. 1026 \ 103. Cape Fear Ash Basin GW Assessment\43.Coal Pile Assessment\Work Plan\Cape Fear - Coal Pile Assessment Work Plan TM_FINAL.docx Coal Pile Assessment Work Plan November 13, 2018 Duke Energy Progress, LLC, Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant SynTerra indicate coal might have been stored in at least two different, but overlapping, areas south of the 1956 ash basin. The approximate footprint of each of the two coal storage areas is shown on Figure 1. The original pile was located west of where the coal was stored more recently, until the plant ceased operations in 2012. Together, the combined historical footprint of the two coal piles encompasses approximately 11 acres. The 1956 ash basin dike borders the former coal pile storage area to the north and northwest. A flood dike is between the former coal pile areas and the Cape Fear River to the west. South of the former coal pile areas there is a slight topographical rise. Surface water runoff from the area is directed toward a low-lying area to the east of the former coal pile area. Flow from the wet area is toward Shaddox Creek. Coal Pile Area Assessment Objectives Objectives of the coal pile area assessment include the following: • Supplement the existing background dataset with additional background samples from a location with similar geology that is upgradient of the former coal pile • Compare inorganic constituent concentrations in former coal pile area with Site background concentrations • Characterize inorganic constituents associated with former coal pile area soils • Characterize inorganic constituent concentrations in soil and groundwater along the former coal pile perimeter Soil Assessment Former coal pile area unsaturated soil is proposed to be sampled and analyzed for inorganic parameters to determine whether the unsaturated soil is a potential secondary source of CCR-related constituents that could leach into underlying groundwater. Unsaturated soil samples are proposed to be collected at proposed monitoring well locations (CP-BG, and CP-I through CP-9) as part of well installation activities (Figure 1), including a background location. Soil samples are proposed to be collected at approximately 2-foot intervals to the top of the groundwater table (approximately 10 feet below ground surface). Saturated soil samples are proposed to be collected below the water table within the new well screened intervals. Soil samples will be analyzed for inorganic parameters listed on Table 1. Page 2 of 3 P:\Duke Energy Progress. 1026 \ 103. Cape Fear Ash Basin GW Assessment\43.Coal Pile Assessment\Work Plan\Cape Fear - Coal Pile Assessment Work Plan TM_FINAL.docx Coal Pile Assessment Work Plan November 13, 2018 Duke Energy Progress, LLC, Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant SynTerra Groundwater Assessment Twenty (20) former coal pile (CP) assessment groundwater monitoring wells are proposed to be installed to characterize former coal pile area groundwater in shallow (surficial) and bedrock groundwater zones. The shallow zone is considered groundwater within soil, alluvium, and saprolite material. The bedrock zone is considered groundwater within competent bedrock material underlying the shallow zone. CSA data indicate the "deep" zone of partially weathered rock is insufficiently thick for monitoring. Ten (10) shallow ("S") and 10 bedrock ("BR") groundwater monitoring wells (CP-BG and CP-IS/BR through CP-9S/BR) would be installed as well pairs, including a background location. Proposed CP well installation locations are shown on Figure 1, and proposed well details are provided as Table 2. Specific well locations may be shifted depending on access and field conditions at the time of installation. Groundwater samples will be analyzed for inorganic constituents listed on Table 3. Coal Pile Assessment Report The former coal pile assessment report will be prepared following collection and receipt of at least two sets of groundwater analytical data. The report will include the following components: 1) Site History and Source Characterization 2) Site Geology and Hydrogeology 3) Sampling Results 4) Site Conceptual Model 5) Conclusions and Recommendations ATTACHMENTS: Table 1: Soil Analytical Methods Table 2: Proposed Coal Pile Assessment Soil Samples and Monitoring Wells Table 3: Groundwater Analytical Methods Figure 1: Proposed Coal Pile Assessment Sample Locations Page 3 of 3 P:\Duke Energy Progress. 1026 \ 103. Cape Fear Ash Basin GW Assessment\43.Coal Pile Assessment\Work Plan\Cape Fear - Coal Pile Assessment Work Plan TM_FINAL.docx Coal Pile Assessment Work Plan November 13, 2018 Duke Energy Progress, LLC, Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant ATTACHMENTS SynTerra P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\103. Cape Fear Ash Basin GW Assessment\43.Coal Pile Assessment\Work Plan\Cape Fear - Coal Pile Assessment Work Plan TM_FINAL.docx TABLE 1 SOIL ANALYTICAL METHODS CAPE FEAR STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC, MONCURE, NC INORGANIC COMPOUNDS UNITS METHOD Aluminum mg/kg EPA 6010D Antimony mg/kg EPA 6020B Arsenic mg/kg EPA 6020A Barium mg/kg EPA 6010C Beryllium mg/kg EPA 6020B Boron mg/kg EPA 6010C Cadmium mg/kg EPA 6020A Calcium mg/kg EPA 6010C Chloride mg/kg EPA 9056A Chromium mg/kg EPA 6010C Cobalt mg/kg EPA 6020A Copper mg/kg EPA 6010C Iron mg/kg EPA 6010C Lead mg/kg EPA 6020A Magnesium mg/kg EPA 6010C Manganese mg/kg EPA 6010C Mercury mg/kg EPA Method 7471B Molybdenum mg/kg EPA 6010C Nickel mg/kg EPA 6010C Nitrate as Nitrogen mg/kg EPA 9056A pH SU EPA 9045D Potassium mg/kg EPA 6010C Selenium mg/kg EPA 6020A Sodium mg/kg EPA 6010C Strontium mg/kg EPA 6010C Sulfate mg/kg EPA 9056A Thallium (low level) (SPLP Extract only) mg/kg EPA 6020A Total Organic Carbon mg/kg EPA 9060 Vanadium mg/kg EPA 6020A Zinc mg/kgmg/kg EPA 6010C Prepared by: RBI Checked by: CIS Notes: 1. Soil samples to be analyzed for Total Inorganics using USEPA Methods 6010/6020 and pH using USEPA Method 9045, as noted above. 2. Ash samples to be analyzed for Total Inorganics using USEPA Methods 6010/6020 and pH using USEPA Method 9045; select ash samples will also be analyzed for leaching potential using SPLP Extraction Method 1312 in conjunction with USEPA Methods 6010/6020. 3. Analytical methods and reporting limits as presented were applicable at time of CSA field implementation in 2015. Analytical methods and reporting limits are updated periodically and applied as appropriate. meq/100g - millequivalents per 100 grams mg/kg - Milligrams per kilogram my - Millivolts S.U. - Standard Unit P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\103. Cape Fear Ash Basin GW Assessment\43.Coal Pile Assessment\Work Plan\ Table 1 - Soil Analytical Methods Page 1 of 1 TABLE 2 PROPOSED COAL PILE ASSESSMENT SOIL SAMPLES AND MONITORING WELLS CAPE FEAR STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC, MONCURE, NC Monitoring Well ID Estimated Well Depth (feet bgs) Soil Sample ID (Estimated Depth Interval in feet bgs) Comments CPBG-01SB 2-3 Near -surface unsaturated soil sample, water table —10 feet bgs CPBG-01SB 5-6 Unsaturated soil sample, water table —10 feet bgs CPBG-01SB 8-9 Unsaturated soil sample, water table —10 feet bgs CPBG-01S 25 CPBG-01SB (20-21) Soil sample from shallow well screened interval CPBG-01BR 50 CPBG-01SB (45-46) Soil sample from bedrock well screened interval CP-02SB 2-3 Near -surface unsaturated soil sample, water table —10 feet bgs CP-02SB 5-6 Unsaturated soil sample, water table —10 feet bgs CP-02SB 8-9 Unsaturated soil sample, water table —10 feet bgs CP-02S 25 CP-02SB (20-21) Soil sample from shallow well screened interval CP-02BR 50 CP-02SB (45-46) Soil sample from bedrock well screened interval CP-03SB 2-3 Near -surface unsaturated soil sample, water table —10 feet bgs CP-03SB 5-6 Unsaturated soil sample, water table —10 feet bgs CP-03SB 8-9 Unsaturated soil sample, water table —10 feet bgs CP-03S 25 CP-03SB (20-21) Soil sample from shallow well screened interval CP-03BR 50 CP-03SB (45-46) Soil sample from bedrock well screened interval CP-04SB 2-3 Near -surface unsaturated soil sample, water table —10 feet bgs CP-04SB 5-6 Unsaturated soil sample, water table —10 feet bgs CP-04SB 8-9 Unsaturated soil sample, water table —10 feet bgs CP-04S 25 CP-04SB (20-21) Soil sample from shallow well screened interval CP-04BR 50 CP-04SB (45-46) Soil sample from bedrock well screened interval CP-05SB 2-3 Near -surface unsaturated soil sample, water table —10 feet bgs CP-05SB 5-6 Unsaturated soil sample, water table —10 feet bgs CP-05SB 8-9 Unsaturated soil sample, water table —10 feet bgs CP-05S 25 CP-05SB (20-21) Soil sample from shallow well screened interval CP-05BR 50 CP-05SB (45-46) Soil sample from bedrock well screened interval CP-06SB 2-3 Near -surface unsaturated soil sample, water table —10 feet bgs CP-06SB (5-6) Unsaturated soil sample, water table —10 feet bgs CP-06SB 8-9 Unsaturated soil sample, water table —10 feet bgs CP-06S 25 CP-06SB (20-21) Soil sample from shallow well screened interval CP-06BR 50 CP-06SB (45-46) Soil sample from bedrock well screened interval CP-07SB 2-3 Near -surface unsaturated soil sample, water table —10 feet bgs CP-07SB 5-6 Unsaturated soil sample, water table —10 feet bgs CP-07SB 8-9 Unsaturated soil sample, water table —10 feet bgs CP-07S 25 CP-07SB (20-21) Soil sample from shallow well screened interval CP-07BR 50 CP-07SB (45-46) Soil sample from bedrock well screened interval CP-08SB 2-3 Near -surface unsaturated soil sample, water table —10 feet bgs CP-08SB 5-6 Unsaturated soil sample, water table —10 feet bgs CP-08SB 8-9 Unsaturated soil sample, water table —10 feet bgs CP-08S 25 CP-08SB (20-21) Soil sample from shallow well screened interval CP-08BR 50 CP-08SB (45-46) Soil sample from bedrock well screened interval P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\103. Cape Fear Ash Basin GW Assess ment\43.CoaI Pile Assessment\Work Plan\ Table 2 - CF Proposed Coal Pile Assessment Boring & Well Depths Page 1 of 2 TABLE 2 PROPOSED COAL PILE ASSESSMENT SOIL SAMPLES AND MONITORING WELLS CAPE FEAR STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC, MONCURE, NC Monitoring Well ID Estimated Well Depth (feet bgs) Soil Sample ID (Estimated Depth Interval in feet bgs) Comments CP-09SB 2-3 Near -surface unsaturated soil sample, water table —10 feet bgs CP-09SB 5-6 Unsaturated soil sample, water table —10 feet bgs CP-09SB 8-9 Unsaturated soil sample, water table —10 feet bgs CP-09S 25 CP-09SB (20-21) Soil sample from shallow well screened interval CP-09BR 50 CP-09SB (45-46) Soil sample from bedrock well screened interval CP-10SB 2-3 Near -surface unsaturated soil sample, water table —10 feet bgs CP-10SB (5-6) Unsaturated soil sample, water table —10 feet bgs CP-10SB 8-9 Unsaturated soil sample, water table —10 feet bgs CP-10S 25 CP-10SB (20-21) Soil sample from shallow well screened interval CP-10BR 50 CP-10SB (45-46) Soil sample from bedrock well screened interval Prepared by: LWD Checked by: CJS Notes: bgs = below ground surface — = Approximately SynTerra recommends rotosonic drilling methods for boring and well installation Continuous cores from sonic drilling provide sufficient material for soil sampling and lithologic description. Estimated well and soil sample depths based on data from the CMW-2, CTMW-2, ABMW-5S/BR, and MW-17S/BR wells. Number of soil samples shown is approximate. A shallower water table will result in fewer samples, and a deeper water table may result in additional samples. SynTerra recommends each well screen be submerged beneath the water table and have a length of at least 10 feet SynTerra proposes soil samples be collected from well screen intervals for potential use in MNA analysis. "S", or surficial wells, may include a surificial upper (SU) and surficial lower (SL) well installation depending on site -specific hydrogeologic conditions. * Indicates approximate estimation of vertical exploration. Current data is insufficient to provide more accurate estimates. Boring total depth to be determined during site activities. P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\103. Cape Fear Ash Basin GW Assess ment\43.CoaI Pile Assessment\Work Plan\ Table 2 - CF Proposed Coal Pile Assessment Boring & Well Depths Page 2 of 2 TABLE 3 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL METHODS CAPE FEAR STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC, MONCURE, NC PARAMETER I RL JUNITS IMETHOD FIELD PARAMETERS pH NA SU Field Water Quality Meter Specific Conductance NA PS/Cm Field Water Quality Meter Temperature NA 0C Field Water Quality Meter Dissolved Oxygen NA mg/L Field Water Quality Meter Oxidation Reduction Potential NA mV Field Water Quality Meter Eh INA IMV IField Water Quality Meter Turbidity NA INTU IField Water Quality Meter INORGANICS Aluminum 0.005 mg/L EPA 200.7 or 6010D Antimony 0.001 mg/L EPA 200.8 or 6020B Arsenic 0.001 mg/L EPA 200.8 or 6020B Barium 0.005 mg/L EPA 200.7 or 6010D Beryllium 0.001 mg/L EPA 200.8 or 6020B Boron 0.05 mg/L EPA 200.7 or 6010D Cadmium 0.001 mg/L EPA 200.8 or 6020B Chromium 0.001 mg/L EPA 200.8 or 6020B Cobalt 0.001 mg/L EPA 200.8 or 6020B Copper 0.001 mg/L EPA 200.8 or 6020B Hexavalent Chromium 0.000025 mg/L EPA 218.7 Iron 0.01 mg/L EPA 200.7 or 6010D Lithium 1 mg/L EPA 200.7 or 6010D Lead 0.001 mg/L EPA 200.8 or 6020B Manganese 0.005 mg/L EPA 200.7 or 6010D Mercury 0.00005 mg/L EPA 245.1 or 7470A Molybdenum 0.001 mg/L EPA 200.8 or 6020B Nickel 0.001 mg/L EPA 200.8 or 6020B Selenium 0.001 mg/L EPA 200.8 or 6020B Strontium 0.005 mg/L EPA 200.7 or 6010D Thallium (low level) 0.0002 mg/L EPA 200.8 or 6020B Vanadium (low level) 0.0003 mg/L EPA 200.8 or 6020B Zinc 10.005 mg/L JEPA 200.7 or 6010D RADIONUCLIDES Radium 226 11 pCi/L JEPA 903.1 Modified Radium 228 11 pCi/L JEPA 904.0/SW846 9320 Modified Uranium (233, 234, 236, 238) lVaries by isotope µg/mL ISW846 3010A/6020A ANIONS/CATIONS/OTHER Alkalinity (as CaCO3) 5 mg/L SM 2320B Bicarbonate 5 mg/L SM 2320B Calcium 0.01 mg/L EPA 200.7 Carbonate 5 mg/L SM 2320B Chloride 0.1 mg/L EPA 300.0 or 9056A Fluoride 0.1 mg/L EPA 300.0 or 9056A Magnesium 0.005 mg/L EPA 200.7 or 6010D Potassium 0.1 mg/L EPA 200.7 Sodium 0.05 mg/L EPA 200.7 Sulfate 0.1 mg/L EPA 300.0 or 9056A Sulfide 0.1 mg/L SM 4500 S2 D Total Dissolved Solids 25 mg/L SM 2540C Total Phosphorus 10.05 mg/L JEPA 365.1 Total Organic Carbon 10.1 mg/L SM5310C/EPA9060A Total Suspended Solids 15 m /L ISM 2450D Prepared by: HHS Checked by: CJS Notes: NA indicates not applicable. °C - Degrees Celsius mg/L - Milligrams per liter my - Millivolts NTU - Nephelometric turbidity unit pCi/L - picocuries per liter RL = reporting limit S.U. - Standard Unit ug/mL - micrograms per milliliter µS/cm = micro -Siemens per centimeter Dissolved and total metals analysis P:\Duke Energy Progress. 1026\103. Cape Fear Ash Basin GW Assessment\43. Coal Pile Assessment\Work Plan\ Table 3 - Groundwater Analytical Methods Page 1 of 1 'ABMW-5/S/BR CTM s .i COAL STOCKPILE ASSESSMENT AREA CP-5S/B C P-9 CP-2S/BR :e . FORMER COAL PILE (REMOVED) COAL STOCKPILE AREA BASED ON 1965 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH . CP-WBR C P-7 COAL STOCKPILE AREA BASED ON 1950 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH FORMER STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT r MW-17SUSU/BR 1�lp synTerra PBG-1 S/BR � y GRAPHIC SCALE 100 0 100 200 IN FEET 148 RIVER STREET, SUITE 220 GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA 29601 PHONE 864-421-9999 WWW 'erraooro.00m DRAWN BY: A. FEIGL DATE: 08/24/2018 PROJECT MANAGER: C.SUTTELL CHECKED BY: L. DRAGO P:\Duke Enerav Proaress.1026\00 GIS BASE DATA\Cane Fear' LEGEND PROPOSED COAL PILE ASSESSMENT SOIL BORING AND MONITORING WELL EXISTING CAMA GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOCATION ASH BASIN WASTE BOUNDARY DUKE ENERGY PLANT BOUNDARY TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS (10' INTERVAL) TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS (Z INTERVAL) NOTES AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY OBTAINED FROM USDA FSA NAIP, DATED 06/19/2014 VIA ESRI WEB SERVICE. DRAWING HAS BEEN SET WITH A PROJECTION OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM FIPS 3200 (NAD83/2011). FIGURE 1 PROPOSED COAL PILE ASSESSMENT SAMPLE LOCATIONS CAPE FEAR STEAM POWER PLANT DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC MONCURE, NORTH CAROLINA