20061463 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20060908

Find Wetland Project

A p c 0 o:-
grS } Eerl's In?slo n -?
JE is °-Af>Qa ons F as AfAlj ?
r
Detallst _ DeiaJls2 «,'€Parintts and?ertsd - - '-`""' Cipas eE? is:u` r]
Project Number. 20061463 Version 1
J Status: Issued LastActlon Desc: Project issued
'Project Name. Oallery Subdivision Phase 1 - ( 'Project Type. (Residential Subdivision
Project Desc. '.culverts for residential roadway
Danny -
*Owner _.._ .._.. _. ?._
? ? Details. ?

--
*Received From: Applicant W
--- _..y
COEID 'Primary County.
I
. .. , .. '? - ?. DOTTIP: 'Admin Region: Winsto Salem
Received DI: 09 08 2006 Reviewer. Caryl lamb

..
Issued DC 0 911 512 0 0 6 r e -
- f

- r *
._. _- - Secondary County
Statutory Dt h .
CAMA N EPAI SEPA Received Dt
-? `
- DCM Office: -
SW Plan Received Dt
COE Ofice: ?lalelgh Regulatory Field Office SW Plan Approved Df Public Notice Published Dt
Last Updated By. ?laurle dennison SAN Plan Location: Public Notice Received Dt
Last Updated On 0 9 1 212 0 06
P.N. Comment Period Ends Dt I
Sewage Disposal:
Back Close
I--
,Read/ !Page III - - - -
JSIDWPOt
Triage Check List
Date: 9/12/06
Project Name: Gallery SD Phase I
DWQ#: 06-1463
County: Rockingham
Daryl Lamb, Winston-Salem Regional Office
To:
60-day processing time: 9/08/06 -10/06/06 COURTESY COPY
From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone: [phone]
The file attached is being forwarded to you for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks!
2
ee
ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC.
PROFESSIONAL DESIGN SERVICES
406 GALLIMORE DAIRY ROAD, GREENSBORO, NC 27410
336-931-0910 FAX [phone]
TO: DWQ
2321 Crabtree Blvd. Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone#: [phone]
0061463
COQ'S
COPY
®USPS []UPS ?FedEx []Hand Delivered
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
DATE 9/7/06 JOB NO. 22470
77=1N: Beverly Strickland
RE: The Gallery SD - Ph 1
We are sending you ®Attached []Under separate cover via the following items:
[]Shop drawings ?Prints []Plans []Samples []Specifications
[]Copy of Letter []Change Order ?
Copies Date No. Description
1 8/23/2006 P 5 - 13 PCN Application
1 NA 1 USGS Ma showing project site location
1 7/13/2006 1 Vicinity Ma showing stream crossings
1 7/19/2006 1 Soils Ma
1 7/13/2006 3 Stream Crossing # 1 and Crossing #2 with Profile
1 10/4/2005 4 Data Form b ECS, Ltd
1 NA 1 Figure 3

THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below
[]For approval []Approved as submitted []Resubmit _ copies for approval
[]For your use []Approved as noted []Submit _ copies for distribution
?As requested []Returned for corrections []Return _ corrected prints
[]For review and comment ® Asa courtesy copy- no fee
[]For Bids Due ?Prints returned after loan to us
Remarks
Todd Tuqwell had asked me to contact DWQ about whether or not to send a courtesy copy. Beverly, we spoke
on 6/19/06 and you indicated that a courtesy copy should be sent to DWQ. Please find enclosed a copy of the
documents sent to Mr. Tuqwell.
Copy to Todd Tugwell / US Army Corps of Eng Signed: Robin Austin, P.E.
C 0 W R
U:\24\24470\24470ENG\Design\Communication\LOTs\060907-24470-PCN-DWQ.doc S E P 8 2006
DENR • WATER QUALITY
V MANDSAND STCMWATER Bib;NCH
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
20061463
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing a T17-S ' COPY
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39, 33
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), cherlt,
'? L? VV 11.55 D
II. Applicant Information
SEP 8 2006
1. Owner/Applicant Information DENR - WATER QUALITY
Name: Hommel Bottex Group, LLC WETLANDS AND STDIRMWATER BRANCH
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 899
Eden NC 27288
Telephone Number: [phone] [phone] cell Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Page 5 of 13
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: The Gallery Subdivision - Phase 1
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 7080 19 61 1242 00
4. Location
County: Rockingham Nearest Town: Eden
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): The Gallery - Phase 1 (13 Lots)
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): East on Kings Highway.
North on Pierce Street, East on Dogwood, South on Southwood, Ease on Maplewood, North
on Briarwood. End Proiect (Ph 1)
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum):
Crossing #1:
Crossing #2:
36.49642°N -79.72939°W
36.49522°N -79.72790°W
6. Property size (acres): Phase One = 13 acres (Total parcel size = 46.25 ac)
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Moir Branch (unnamed tributary to Dan River)
8. River Basin: Roanoke
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http:Hh2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Residential
Page 6 of 13

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Stream Crossing #1 consists of a roadway crossing a stream and requires the placement of two
54" dia. Culverts, 75 feet in length. Estimated impact to the stream is 130 ft with riprap @
inverts. Stream Crossing #2 consists of a 8" gravity sewer line installation across a stream
under the requirements of NWP 12. The stream is approximately 10ft from top of bank to top of
bank. Dewatering is anticipated for sewer pipe installation and therefore, NWP 33 permit is
requested. Proposed equipment includes a backhoe, 4" dewatering pump: and crane / mini
excavator for 54" pipe placement.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The new culverts will allow for a residential
roadway to be built through the parcel without interrupting the flow of the existing stream.
The new sanitary sewer will collect wastewater from the new. development.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. None known.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
Future phase work will include additional stream crossings for the upper portion of the Moir
Creek; however proposed crossings are to be accomplished using Conspan Systems.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
Page 7 of 13
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Stream impact will be limited to 48 hours
and will be scheduled when no rain is predicted. Based on wetland delineation and survey,
wetlands do not appear to be present at the point on the stream where the culverts will be set.
1. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
se aratel list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
( es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
2. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 4073.11 ft2
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
Crossing #1 Unnamed tributary
to Moir Branch Culvert installation Perennial loft 130 LF .0298

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 130 LF .03
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact. Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on ma) ocean, etc.) (acres)
Page 8 of 13
Total Open Water Impact (acres)
5. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.03
Wetland Impact (acres):
Open Water Impact (acres):
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.03
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 130
6. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
7. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Expected pond surface area:
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. A Conspan System was
oriainally considered for the roadwav crossing the stream; however, the _existinq steep slope on
the south side severely limited the use of a Conspan System and did not allow for adequate
bedding of the footing. Location of the stream and the natural fall of the existinq grade limited
the placement of the sanitary sewer line: otherwise multiple stream crossings would have been
required.
watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
Page 9 of 13
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Page 10 of 13
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify V Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
* Impact Required
Zone ??, Multiplier
3 (2 for Catawba)
1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of 13
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. There is no existing impervious area on the
parcel. Proposed pervious area will be limited to roadways, driveways sidewalks & houses.
Expected percent pervious for Phase 1 developed is 12%. The majority of runoff is directed via
proposed swales to storm pipes that discharge to the existing stream. Riprap is proposed at the
storm pipe outlet, and is sized for the appropriate storm event.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Property. This trunk line discharges to the City of Eden's Mebane Bridge Wastewater treatment
facility NC 0025071.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
These activities will provide service only to this overall project, and will not aid in the
development of any other properties
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
Page 12 of 13
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Applicant/Agent's Signature ` Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 13 of 13
UNNAMED TRIBUTARY TO MOIR BRANCH
PROJECT: THE GALLERY SUBDIVISION - PHASE 1
MAP SOURCE: TOPOZONE
USGS
SOUTHEAST EDEN QUADRANGLE
NC - ROCKINGHAM CO.
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)

PROJECT LOCATION: SOUTH OF STADIUM DRIVE, WEST OF EDGEWOOD DRIVE
EDEN, NC
LAT: 36.50590
LONG: -79.72704
THE GALLERY - PHASE 1
STREAM
CROSSING F
TRIBUTARY TO m . ,
MOIR CREEK)

` STREAM
CROSSING #2
(TRIBUTARY TO
MOIR CREEK)
?? M rt ._.d *'ya'"it'a r e r .'w t
EDEN, NORTH CAROLINA
USGS SOUTHEAST EDEN
UTM 17 613871E 4039742N (NAD 27)
SOURCE: TOPOZONE.COM
LAT 36.49859
LONG -79.72936 VICINITY MAP
ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. ° 1000 2000
mmmm"
Professional Design Services SCALE IN FEET
A9A www.andassoc.com 406 Gallimore Dairy Road
Greensboro, NC 27409 DOCUMENT NO.
Virginia - North Carolina. - Tennessee 336-931-0910 24470-110
kitts / Jul 13, 2006 12.24pm / U:\24\24470\24470ENG\Design \Plans\Z441U-5iterian-d.awg: wcmap
?-I-I-1-I-1-1-?
I-1-I-I-I-1-I-1-1-I
?-I-?-I-I-I-I-I-I-1-I
I-?-I-?-1-I-I-I-1-I-I-
1 I -' --I --I -1T i -I-? 1-1-
- - I-1
I-I-I-I-1-I-I- -I-?-?-I
M111111I-I-I-I- I-I-I
r
r, .-. A w1nCnC+nw1 4
?u
/l
r'??J Cod.
??.???...+..+...a& .--....?........ ??., SCALE IN FEET
Professional Design Services
AVA www.andassoc.com 406 Gallimore Dairy Road 19 JUL 2006
Greensboro, NC 27409
Virginia - North Carolina - Tennessee 336-931-0910 24470=114
kitts / Oct 07, 2005 5:25pm / U: \24\24470\24470ENG\Design\Plans\24470prj\dwg\24470-soils.dwg: SOILS
THE GALLERY -PHASE 1
CDO CLASS .
1 /P
0 1 '
os
N
RCPs (2) ?A(V\
S? BELOW \
9?
04--
-1 ?? \
NC T CLASS?
RlP ?
TR/B TO 4
\\ X\c \ \
X
1 \
5 \\
STREAM CROSSING ,1`1
goo
50
ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. ° .?
Professional Design Services SCALE IN FEET
A9A www.andassoc.com 406 Gallimore Dairy Road
Greensboro, NC 27409 DOCUMENT NO.
Virginia North Carolina - Tennessee 336-931-0910 24470-111
0 \
`ref Q?e \
kitts / Jul 13, 2006 12:24pm / U.\24\24470\24470ENG\Design \Plans\24470-SitePlan-6.dwg: .5 teMgp7
THE GALLERY - PHASE 1
rG??Ay'?sF ;off Q
1
-10
ESEM?En g0 N
? ? pROp .
POR4R '
S = AP f 0 ss
TER F
STREAM CROSSING #2
ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 0 50 goo
Professional Design Services SCALE IN FEET
Q Q www.andassoc.com 406 Gallimore Dairy Road
Greensboro, NC 27409 DOcumENT No.
Virginia - North Carolina - Tennessee 336-931-0910 2440-112
kitts / Jul 19, 2006 9.13am / U. \24 \24470 \24470ENG\ Design\ Plans \24470-SitePlan-6.dwg. SiteMap2
THE GALLERY - PHASE 1
542
k I
538

5 1+ ori

534 i?: to
532 cc

5
- -
528

5

524
- -- PIPE I F

5 -ur
AF-F
520

518 _

51

51
51

AWN
a?aov12+00 12+50 13+00 13+50 14+00 14+50
STREAM CROSSING #2.. - PROFILE
0 50 100
mmmm
ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. SCALE IN FEET
Professional Design Services
A9A www.andassoc.com 406 Gallimore Dairy Road DOCUMENr NO.
Greensboro, NC 27409 24470-113
Virginia - North Carolina - Tennessee 336-931-0910
W
?

W •- O
°• "?', ° "? Q Q

0
?

6

" DIA. .039
2
8" D/A PIPE
51 LF CONCR EN E 8 ' DIP O REEK
D. 19 '
M JOINTS
6

4
2

3
2
2
kitts / Jul 19, 2006 9:13om / U:\24\24470\24470ENG\Design\PIons\24470-SitePlon-6.dwg: SiteMap3
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual
Project/Site: Approximate 46 Acre Tract - Briarwood Drive Project No: Date: October 4, 2005
Applicant/Owner: Hommel Bottex Group, LLC County: Rockingham
Investigators: ECS, Ltd. G-11542 State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP -I
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? NYes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Field Location: View Figure 3
(If needed, explain on the reverse side
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
Ty ha latifolia
Broad-leaf cattail. Herb OBL
Juncus roemeranus
Needlegrass rush Herb OBL
Carex sp.
Sedge sp. Herb FACW

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC: 100%
(excluding FAC-) FAC Neutral:
Numeric Index:
Remarks:
The dominant vegetation is bydrophytic.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other

® No Recorded Data

Field Observations

Depth of Surface Water: 0"

Depth to Free Water in Pit: 10"

Depth to Saturated Soil: 5" Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain In Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are resent.
(Wetform) Page I of 2
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual
Project/Site: Approximate 46 Acre Tract -Briarwood Drive Project No: Date: October 4, 2005
Applicant/Owner: Hommel Bottex Group, LLC County: Rockingham
Investigators: ECS, Ltd. G-11542 State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-1
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Ayersville gravelly loam
Map Symbol: AyF
Drainage Class: Well Drained
Mapped Hydric Inclusion? ?Yes ® No
Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type: ?Yes ® No
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Umbric dystrocbrepts
Profile Descri tion
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Textur Concretions, Structure, etc.
0-12" 2.5Y 4/2 5YR 3/4 20% Loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol
? Histie Epipedon
? Sulfidic Odor
? Concretions
? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime
® Reducing Conditions
® Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Other (Explain In Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ®Yes ? No
Hydric Soils Present? [yes ? No
Remarks:
The three wetland criteria are present, The sampling point is located within a wetland.
(Wetform) Page 2 of 2
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual
Project/Site: Approximate 46 Acre Tract - Briarwood Drive Project No: Date: October 4, 2005
Applicant/Owner: Hommel Bottex Group, LLC County: Rockingham
Investigators: ECS, Ltd. G-11542 State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-2
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Field Location: View Figure 3
If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
Toxicodendron radicans
Poison Ivy Vine FAC
Lonicera japonica
Japanese honeysuckle Vine FAG
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tull tree Tree/Sap FAC
Juni erns virginiana
Eastern red cedar Sap FACU-

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC: 50%
(excluding FAC-) FAC Neutral:
Numeric Index:
Remarks:
50% of the vegetation is hydro hytic.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other

® No Recorded Data

Field Observations

Depth of Surface Water: 0"

Depth to Free Water in Pit: >12"

Depth to Saturated Soil: >12" Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators
? Inundated
a Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are not resent.
(Wetform) Page i of 2
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual
Project/Site: Approximate 46 Acre Tract - Briarwood Drive Project No: Date: October 4, 2005.
Applicant/Owner: Hommel Bottex Group, LLC County: Rockingham
Investigators: ECS, Ltd. G-11542 State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-2
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Ayersville gravelly loam
Map Symbol: AyF
Mapped Hydric Inclusion? ?Yes ® No
Drainage Class: Well Drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Umbric dystrochrepts Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type: ?Yes ® No
Profile Descri tion
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches Horizon Munsell Moist) unsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc.
0-12" 5YR 416 0% Loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol
? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are not present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? ?Yes ® No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology and hydric soil indicators are not present. The sampling point is not located within a wetland.
(Wetform) , Page 2 of 2
THE STRE.04, wtLTl.k d AND_t 6ML-t CAMNS.SHOW
this M,0 ARE AApROXI6MATE. THEY HAVE BEEN
DELINEATED. THEY HAVE NOT BERN VB11FiEH BY THE U.S
ARMY CORPS OF NCHNEER n ND 114EY HAVE Rf&RFAN-
SURVEYED.
e
r -1
9AR 1-2
. .
?aVe We.
-SA-67 -
SAC
WAC 1-17
o SA-91
_ AppFaxWAMLocaiioa of Sdreazi o .
?tivo
Approximatc cation Of weitaad
SA-49 - ...Flag Nmibm
wwM Approximato Location of Culvert
SOV]tCE:- ' FIGURE 3
St'tE MAp pRflYIDEfl V STREAMIWETLAND/PONA LOCATION MAP
4 ACRE TRACT
C. E. ROB&RSON & ASSOCIATES, BRIARWOOD
REGISTERED L-A D, SURVEYERS.. EDEN, NOR..._ EN, NORTH H-CAROLROADINA'
AND ECS FIELD NOTES
NOT TO SCALE Mcow?uerw,; WY=.VA ECS`FROJBCT NQ: f?-It
CI