20061711 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20060912

W A TF9Q
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Mr. Mike Clegg -- -
City of Kannapolis
P.O. Box 1199
246 Oak Avenue
Kannapolis, NC 28081
Subject: Outfall Improvement, Village Park, Phase 2, Kannapolis
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Clegg:
Jr
1
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to impact 70
linear feet (If) of Dye Branch in order to improve an outfall (previously constructed for Cannon Mills) in
Cabarrus County, as described in your application received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on October
30, 2006. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this project is covered by W er Quality
General Certification Number 3494, which can be viewed on our web site at -
http://h2o.enr.state. nc. us/ncwetlands. The general certification allows you to use Nationwide Per it Number 3
once it is issued to you by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Please note that you should get an other
federal, state or local permits before proceeding with your project, including those required by (but n limited
to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
The above noted certification will expire when the associated 404 permit expires unless otherwise
specified in the general certification. This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described
in your application. If you change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be required to send
us a new application for a new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the
certification and approval letter; and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions.
In addition to the requirements of the certification, you must also comply with the following conditions:
1. The Mooresville Regional Office shall be notified in writing once construction at the approved impact areas
has commenced.
2. The planting of native vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques must be used where
practicable instead of riprap or other bank hardening methods. If riprap is necessary, it shall not be placed in
the streambed, unless approved by the DWQ.
3. Storm water discharge structures at this site shall be constructed in a manner such that the potential
receiving streams (of the discharge) will not be impacted due to sediment accumulations, scouring or erosion
of the stream banks.
4. Upon completion of the project, the applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" form to the 401 /Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality. Please send photographs of
the upstream and downstream sides of each culvert site to document correct installation, along with the
Certificate of Completion form. No One
Carolina
AMM"lrm
November 16, 2006
DWQ# 06-1711
Cabarrus County
NOV 2, t 2UU6
ti°. QUALITY
RANCH
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: ncwaterquality.org FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Mr. Mike Clegg
November 16, 2006
Page 2
5. Continuing Compliance. The applicant (City of Kannapolis) shall conduct all activities in a manner so as not
to contravene any state water quality standard (including any requirements for compliance with section
303(d) of the Clean Water Act) and any other appropriate requirements of state and federal law. If DWQ
determines that such standards or laws are not being met (including the failure to sustain a designated or
achieved use) or that state or federal law is being violated, or that further conditions are necessary to assure
compliance, DWQ may reevaluate and modify this certification to include conditions` appropriate to assure
compliance with such standards and requirements in accordance with 15 A NCAC 2H.0507(d). Before
codifying the certification, DWQ shall notify the applicant and the US Army Corps of Engineers, provide public
notice in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0503, and provide opportunity for public hearing in accordance with
-15A NCAC 2H.0504. Any new or revised conditions shall be provided to the applicant in writing, shall be
Provided to the United States Army Corps of Engineers for reference in any permit issued pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, and shall also become conditions of the 404` Permit for the project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You
must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition that
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714
Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless
you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
If you have any questions, please telephone Mr. Alan Johnson in the Mooresville Regional Office at 704-663-
1699 or Ms. Cyndi Karoly in the Central Office in Raleigh 919-733-9721.
Sincerely,
r
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Attachments
cc: Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville
Ian McMillan, Wetlands Unit
Cabarrus Development Svc.
Becky Fox, EPA
Central Files
File Copy
David Rector, Site Solutions

Find Wetland Project -< --?, J
Ct5"s.?Mfv 13,11n' fe98? IP7118A&? ?otsLjl InSPef?! ?ma[Ls n..l?n_?'?.j__ __..
?
Detallst Datalls2S a "? 'PB1jd a aS "c ..?.? ' R t Qr? p88 Rafs? _3 `'-?_s ` t
Project Number. 20061711. Version 1 Status: Issued _ .I LastActlon Desc: Project issued
`ProjectName.:CltyolKannapohs:Village Park Phase 2C 'ProJe ctType:?SewerhNastewater `f
Project Desc. revovaoonofcttyoutfall
'Owner. Legg, Mike _J (--Details...
r--
'Receled From IAppllcant COE ID:
-Primary County Cabarrus
DOTTIP:! *Admin Region: Mooresville
ReceivedDf. ,10!3012006 .. .. a "-' r '- Reviewer:?alan.johnson
Issued Dt 11!1712006
'
-- --_ SecondaryCounty__?
Statutory Dt ii M912006 . E I
CAMA NEPAISEPARecelveclDt
DCM Me: -' SW Plan Receled Dt
COE Me: teville Regulatory Field Oftfrcel SW Plan Approved Dt ` Public Notice Published Dt
Last Updated By itaude dennison i SW Plan Location: Public Notice Received Dt I
Last Updated Orr !1110 1!2000 sewage Disposal E--??? P.N. Comment Period Ends Dt
Back 210se
Ready 'Paga.111- SIDIWPDI .

'??1 GZ 2 0 0 6/ 7 1(

0 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 0
Richard B. Hamilton, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Steve Lund, Permit Coordinator
Asheville Office, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Cyndi B. Karoly, Supervisor ='
is e 1
t
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit ,
NCDWQ Wetlands and Stormivater Branch 2()06
FROM: Ron Linville, Regional Coordinator /

Habitat Conservation Program DE NR - `:-a TER A'-1 i Y j „
L14i4*
c11 FJWG5 F??D?c `+jE?'?` '?f i
a
i
DATE: November 8, 2006
SUBJECT: Review of an application by City of Kannapolis, Village Park - Phase 2C (Outfall Improvements),
Dye Branch, Cabarrus County
The City is requesting a letter of concurrence from the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC)
to obtain a 404 permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The NCWRC has reviewed information provided
by the applicant, and field biologists on our staff are familiar with habitat values of the project area. These
comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (33 U.S.C. 466 et. seq.) and
the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
The project is to demolish the City's existing 48" outfall and install a new 96".outfall with concrete end walls and
riprap stilling basins plus gabion retaining walls. The outfall was constructed about forty (40) years ago for Cannon
Mills. New impacts will total 70 feet of jurisdictional waters.
---Based -on-the information provided by the applicant, we do not believe this project will cause significant additional
deleterious effects to waters; however, we recommend that the City and permitting agencies consider an alternative
of "day lighting" and restoring the stream and its floodplain functions as an urban amenity. Such an activity should
improve diminished aquatic and terrestrial habitats. An ancillary stream restoration could benefit the community's
enjoyment of the area as well as provide improved urban aesthetics for the proposed research facilities in the City of
Kannapolis. When any new development or re-development occurs, Low Impact Development (LID) techniques
should be encouraged instead of continuing to pipe stormwater to area streams. Information on LID practices can be
found at ww lowimpactdevelopment.or .
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If you have any questions regarding these
comments, please contact me at 336/769-9453.
E-copy: Allan Johnson, DWQ-MRO
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries - 1721 Mail Service Center - Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
Triage Check List
Date: 11/02/06 Project Name: TOKannapolis Village Park Phase 2C
DWQ #:06-1711
County: Cabarrus
Alan Johnson, Mooresville Regional Office
To:
60-day Processing Time: 10/30/06 -12/28/06

From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone : [phone]
The file attached is being forwarded to you for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks!
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
2® o 5 1 r 1 I
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
r-
L Processing i:',1 t "I ,, L" x T
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: r?ECElVED
X? Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
0 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 3
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ? N/A - NOT APPLICABLE.
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ? N/A.
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), chec N/A.
H. Applicant Information'
<<.?-,cr OUT
1. Owner/Applicant Information 0 0 ??IG'b
Name: CITY OF KANNAPOLIS: C/O MIKE LEGGIt
viu
Mailing Address: P.O. BOX 1199 RIAV44 a Anzf
246 OAK AVENUE
KANNAPOLIS, NC 28081
Telephone Number: 704.920.4333 Fax Number:
E-mail Address: mlegg(ikilannapolis.nc.us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: DAVID P. RECTOR, PE
Company Affiliation: SITE SOLUTIONS
Mailing Address: 2320 W. MOREHEAD ST.
CHARLOTTE, NC 28208
Telephone Number: 704.521.9880 Fax Number: 704.521.8995
E-mail Address: david(a sitesolutionspa.com
Page 5 of 5
M. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: VILLAGE PARK -PHASE 2C (OUTFALL IMPROVEMENTS)
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 5614-42-1221
4. Location
County: CABARRUS Nearest Town: CITY OF KANNAPOLIS
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): NOT APPLICABLE.
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):
THE SITE IS LOCATED JUST WEST OF GOLDSTON ST. BETWEEN MOUNTAIN ST.
AND KING AVE. IN THE CITY OF KANNAPOLIS.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.5061 ON 80.6344 -OW
6. Property size (acres): 15.586 (VILLAGE PARK)
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: IRISH BUFFALO CREEK.
8. River Basin: YADKIN
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen. designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: RESIDENTIAL, RECREATIONAL (PARK/GREENWAY) AND
INSTITUTIONAL. RESIDENTIAL LAND USES SURROUND THE PROPOSED
OUTFALL RENOVATION.
Page 6 of 6
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
THE PROJECT WILL INVOLVE DEMOLITION OF THE CITY'S EXISTING 48" OUTFALL
AND INSTALLATION OF A "NEW" 96" OUTFALL W/CONCRETE ENDWALL RIP RAP
STILLING BASIN, ND GABION RETAINING WALLS. THE EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND
ELEVATION DROP TO THE STREAM (BELOW GOLDSTON RD.) WILL REQUIRE USE OF A
GRADALL, OVERHEAD CRANE AND BACKHOE EQUIPMENT.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: PROPOSED RENOVATION OF EXISTING 48"
CITY OUTFALL TO DYE BRANCH. THE IMPROVEMENTS WILL INCLUDE 96" RCP
OUTLET PIPE W/CONCRETE ENDWALL AND RIP RAP STILLING BASIN. GABION
RETAINING WALLS WILL BE INSTALLED AROUND THE PROPOSED ENDWALL AND
STILLING BASIN.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. THE EXISTING OUTFALL WAS ORIGINALLY CONSTRUCTED
APPROXIMATELY FORTY (40) YEARS AGO AS PART OF THE CANNON MILLS TEXTILE
FACILITY. TO OUR.-KNOWLEDGE., NO JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATIONS OR PERMITS
EXIST FOR THE OUTFALL.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
NO FUTURE IMPACTS ARE ANTICIPATED FOR THIS PROJECT.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap.dissipater pads). Be- sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion.. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. - If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 7
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: THE PROJECT (OUTFALL IMPROVE-
MENTS) WILL IMPACT THE UPSTREAM END OF APPROXIMATELY SEVENTY (70') LINEAL
FEET OF EXISTING JURISDICTIONAL STREAM (DYE BRANCH)
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and floodine.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) vLocated within
100-year
Floodplain
( es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: N/A.
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43.560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
linear feet) Area of
Impact
acres
I DYE BRANCH CULVERT PERENNIAL 10 5 .0011
2 DYE BRANCH ENDWALL PERENNIAL 10 5 .0011
3 DYE BRANCH RIP RAP PERENNIAL 10 60 .0138

?
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) _70 .0161
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number
(if applicable) . Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
indicate on-map) ocean, etc. (acres)

Page 8 of 8
Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the oroiect:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.0161
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.00
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.00
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.00
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 70 .
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ?x No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
NOTE APPLICABLE FOR THIS PROJECT.
8. Pond Creation -NOT APPLICABLE
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts: RENOVATION OF AN
EXISTING CITY OUTFALL TO DYE BRANCH (UPSTREAM END OF STREAM).
CONSTRUCTION AND SILT FENCING WILL BE USED TO ISOLATE THE IMPACTED AREA
AND PROVIDE TURBIDITY AND SEDIMENTATION PROTECTION TO DOWNSTEAM AREAS.
Page 9 of 9
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical . Guide . for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2 o. enr. state.nc.us/nc'wetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A - NOT APPLICABLE.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A.
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A.
Page 10 of 10
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A.
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A.
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A.
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ?X No ?
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ? AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) IS NOT REQUIRED
FOR THIS PROJECT.
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ? N/A
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No 0 NOT APPLICABLE.
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* I Impact., Multiplier ( Required
i? ,,,pro r %
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page I 1 of 11
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. NOT APPLICABLE.
M. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please. provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. PARK AND RECREATION PROJECT FOR THE
CITY OF KANNAPOLIS. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANS (ENCLOSED) ARE BEING
REVIEWED BY CITY CONSULTANT ENGINEER. REDUCTION IN IMPERVIOUS AREA FOR
UPSTREAM WATERSHED AREAS.
701. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
EXISTING PUBLIC WATER AND SEWER (CITY OF KANNAPOLIS) IS PROVIDED TO THE SITE
AND SURROUNDING AREAS.
XM. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No ?
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No x0
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No x?
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT IN UPPER AREAS OF THE EXISTING WATERSHED WILL
BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE WATER QUALITY AND DETENTION REQUIREMENTS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY'S UNIFORM DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (UDO).
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
Page 12 of 12
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
ACCESSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED OUTFALL RENOVATION
DUE TO TOPOGRAPHY WILL IMPACT SEQUENCING AND WORK SCHEDULES
?a.NN-1.
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 13 of 13

TOPOI map printed on 10/24/06 from "village pk.tpo" and "Untitled.tpg"
80°39'00" W E30°3ET00" W
Y
+?H a
?AV
1
J
h
i;4
t
-V
j J4,
&M-11
w, r o
i r
c
80o39'00" W
WGSti4 tlU°3/"VU' VV
f ? ? <r'?c•' . ? ..i fir`' t t
?(•$ 11 ?f 'J 7 C
Lr,
4, ?` • is q
07
'r, 4
d5o
Y}, ?z
S ,?- .r- ._ r r f - M
-- a
Y C?

S ? ?c? 1a .rnC ? ,

L r x
r( ?C}?q 1? n { y _ ? ' V K(((J
z
'. t a r 'sAr k i as tBytk, •, r
80038'00" W WGS848003700" W
1VlN
7%*
o s i Wt
®006 FEET o SCO low METERS
Printed from TOPOI 02001 National Geographic HoWinp (www.topo.com)
AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION
I, MIKE LEGG, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF KANNAPOLIS, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT
I HAVE AUTHORIZED DAVID P. RECTOR, PE OF SITE SOLUTIONS, INC. TO ACT ON
MY BEHALF AND TAKE ALL NECESSARY ACTIONS AS REQUIRED FOR THE
PROCESSING, ISSUANCE, AND ACCEPTANCE OF THIS NATIONWIDE PERMIT, AND
STATE WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION, INCLUDING ANY AND ALL STANDARD
AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS ATTACHED THERETO.
WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE INFORMATION SUBMITTED IN THIS
APPLICATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE.
APPLICANT'S SI NAT E
• ..ter
AGENT'S SIGNATURE
DATE
DATE
Completion of this form will allow the agent to sign all future application correspondence.
•i
LOOKING SOUTH (UPSTREAM) FROM GREENWAY TOWARDS GOLDSTON ST.
PHOTO TAKEN 9.21.96
2 0 0 6 1 7 1 '

LOOKING DOWN FROM GREENWAY TOWARDS EXISTING OUTFALL.
PHOTO TAKEN 9.21.96
LOOKING DOWN AT EXISTING 48" RCP OUTFALL.
PHOTO TAKEN 9.21.96
LOOKING NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) FROM EXISTING OUTFALL.
PHOTO TAKEN 9.21.96
LOOKING FURTHER NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) FROM EXISTING OUTFALL.
PHOTO TAKEN 9.21.96
LOOKING CLOSER AT EXISTING 48" RCP OUTFALL FROM EAST TOB.
PHOTO TAKEN 9.21.96
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
2 0 0 6 1 7
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: % -V EIUL D
? Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 3
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ? N/A - NOT APPLICABLE.
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ? N/A.
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ? N/A.
H. Applicant Information I'?' L1 R71
1. Owner/Applicant Information ©C j r1 /?
Name: CITY OF KANNAPOLIS: C/O MIKE LFGG - CITY ?.
Mailing Address: P.O. BOX 1199 7-1?5c,
KANNAPOLIS, NC 28081
Telephone Number: 704.920.4333 Fax Number:
E-mail Address: mlegg_na,ci.kannapolis.nc.us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: DAVID P. RECTOR, PE
Company Affiliation: SITE SOLUTIONS
Mailing Address: 2320 W. MOREHEAD ST.
CHARLOTTE. NC 28208
Telephone Number: 704.521.9880 Fax Number: 704.521.8995
E-mail Address: david(absitesolutionspa.com
Page 5 of 5
M. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. I Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: VILLAGE PARK -PHASE 2C (OUTFALL IMPROVEMENTS)
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 5614-42-1221
4. Location
County: CABARRUS Nearest Town: CITY OF KANNAPOLIS
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): NOT APPLICABLE.
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):
THE SITE IS LOCATED JUST WEST OF GOLDSTON ST. BETWEEN MOUNTAIN ST.
AND KING AVE. IN THE CITY OF KANNAPOLIS.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.5061 ON 80.6344 °W
6. Property size (acres): 15.586 (VILLAGE PARK)
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: IRISH BUFFALO CREEK.
8. River Basin: YADKIN
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: RESIDENTIAL, RECREATIONAL (PARK/GREENWA)), AND
INSTITUTIONAL. RESIDENTIAL LAND USES SURROUND THE PROPOSED
OUTFALL RENOVATION.
Page 6 of 6
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
THE PROJECT WILL INVOLVE DEMOLITION OF THE CITY'S EXISTING 48" OUTFALL,
AND INSTALLATION OF A "NEW" 96" OUTFALL W/CONCRETE ENDWALL RIP RAP
STILLING BASIN, AND GABION RETAINING WALLS. THE EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND
ELEVATION DROP TO THE STREAM (BELOW GOLDSTON RD.) WILL REQUIRE USE OF A
GRADALL, OVERHEAD CRANE AND BACKHOE EQUIPMENT.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: PROPOSED RENOVATION OF EXISTING 48"
CITY OUTFALL TO DYE BRANCH. THE IMPROVEMENTS WILL INCLUDE 96" RCP
OUTLET PIPE W/CONCRETE ENDWALL AND RIP RAP STILLING BASIN. GABION
RETAINING WALLS WILL BE INSTALLED AROUND THE PROPOSED ENDWALL AND
STILLING BASIN.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. THE EXISTING OUTFALL WAS ORIGINALLY CONSTRUCTED
APPROXIMATELY FORTY (40) YEARS AGO AS PART OF THE CANNON MILLS TEXTILE
FACILITY. TO OUR. KNOWLEDGE., 90 JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATIONS OR PERMITS
EXIST FOR THE OUTFALL.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
NO FUTURE IMPACTS ARE ANTICIPATED FOR THIS PROJECT.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be- sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion.. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 7
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: THE PROJECT (OUTFALL IMPROVE-
MENTS) WILL IMPACT THE UPSTREAM END OF APPROXIMATELY SEVENTY (70') LINEAL
FEET OF EXISTING JURISDICTIONAL STREAM (DYE BRANCH).
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number

(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,

herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain

( es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream

(linear feet Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: N/A.
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be. sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multi ly length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
I DYE BRANCH CULVERT PERENNIAL 10 5 .0011
2 DYE BRANCH ENDWALL PERENNIAL 10 5 .0011
3 DYE BRANCH RIP RAP PERENNIAL 10 60 .0138

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 70 .0161
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number
(if applicable) . Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on ma ocean, etc. (acres)

Page 8 of 8
Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.0161
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.00
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.00
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.00
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 70
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ?X No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
NOTE APPLICABLE FOR THIS PROJECT.
Pond Creation -NOT APPLICABLE
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts: RENOVATION OF AN
EXISTING CITY OUTFALL TO DYE BRANCH (UPSTREAM END OF STREAM).
CONSTRUCTION AND SILT FENCING WILL BE USED TO ISOLATE THE IMPACTED AREA
AND PROVIDE TURBIDITY AND SEDIMENTATION PROTECTION TO DOWNSTEAM AREAS.
Page 9 of 9
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed: Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical. Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr. state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A - NOT APPLICABLE.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A.
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A.
Page 10 of 10
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A.
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A.
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A.
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ?X No ?
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?X AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) IS NOT REQUIRED
FOR THIS PROJECT.
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ? N/A
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify, )? Yes ? No X? NOT APPLICABLE.
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Impact
Ar-.N I Multiplier I Required
Zone* I ,. ,-
I
3 (2 for Catawba)
1.5
Total I I I
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of 11
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. NOT APPLICABLE.
M. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please. provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. PARK AND RECREATION PROJECT FOR THE
CITY OF KANNAPOLIS. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANS (ENCLOSED) ARE BEING
REVIEWED BY CITY CONSULTANT ENGINEER. REDUCTION IN IMPERVIOUS AREA FOR
UPSTREAM WATERSHED AREAS.
XH. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
EXISTING PUBLIC WATER AND SEWER (CITY OF KANNAPOLIS) IS PROVIDED TO THE SITE
AND SURROUNDING AREAS.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No ?
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No ?
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No X?
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT IN UPPER AREAS OF THE EXISTING WATERSHED WILL
BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE WATER QUALITY AND DETENTION REQUIREMENTS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY'S UNIFORM DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (UDO).
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
Page 12 of 12
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
ACCESSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED OUTFALL RENOVATION
DUE TO TOPOGRAPHY WILL IMPACT SEQUENCING AND WORK SCHEDULES.
1 U. N-1.
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 13 of 13
TOPOI map printed on 10/24/06 from "villagepk.tpo" and "Untitled.tpg"
80°39'00" W 80°38'00" W WGS64 80°3700" W
`T o? i Y t fi r?/ sz x }C v q "? Z
?,? _? ?•,,., jam-/ ' ? V o? l r ?'??I? r 'i ? '??? `?. ?q ??-._?? ` 3 ? ° c ?' ? C ???
wF?
v \-' ?' a r ? ? - air , ? *.{?'? ? 1-, { ,.,-c` Yom' _ ? -,, r i+ t+•' +• Y ' -- :?:n
o
l'+'$ ??' P- i !',\ ?` '•- ?`? ,..?' 1.. ? Q ?v{a 1 \,y?? - ys\ \ ?i ej;. ?.`. ?, ;?? rt''"? ?.._' as'. ???.; i?.
777
J;
7 ,`'? . ``.fem. 1! \? ??'\ 11 .^-• , P7?ft.M1 (c '
d?
? ? 'J t?j?'?. ! ? 'SO = ? '?.-Jljria:? ?. \ •?.} ?s? l' ,,h ? •?• ???... l?r'." w: t `'` I"a - ?? . . r I X,
? r r` ,' i 1 ? • ) ??I t.,--- .:; f ?' treat 4'k.• 1 t ..:. `( ? ? s - y
On"")
?.
. s s y - v y,; JJJlll
RPHnt ??"
?. i
i ??i %4 . ; a 3\ Protect Site
--F"•r-.?.._ - ` f 92+1 0 s ?•? ? -? ? ? 1w. .0d1?35 w}»22° , 80 8U4?-W t f ""M?aier??-LC.,.,"?'?
1 -`t
? ? 1 t
j C ^-\ / ,,. /d ; l 1. }?.?, YYY???--- `t ---? (!LiNI ? F I .?., `? Ey , O
<( ) ?? A t ?t ?` q r m
X, z
h 1 \ 1 ? Y ? ./? r ?•? . ? I .. lr. L d+? O
Tem
,5 J
t 1 ?'?? 11 ?v 1'?1 5
?_.--`-1? 4 ti .?,1? r ?. ? 1?q ? r . f ,7, 9` ? ?rrt ?'"?' ]t? & V; 3 ip( f5.?. ? ?, i_r - ? ? tt1,•?'.
Boo39'00" W 80°38'00" W WGS84 80°37'00" W
MN o s iWt
®000 FEET 0 500 1000 METERS
1 Printed from TOP0102001 Nationd Geogmphic HoHivp (www.topo.com)
AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION
I, MIKE LEGG, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF KANNAPOLIS, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT
I HAVE AUTHORIZED DAVID P. RECTOR, PE OF SITE SOLUTIONS, INC. TO ACT ON
MY BEHALF AND TAKE ALL NECESSARY ACTIONS AS REQUIRED FOR THE
PROCESSING, ISSUANCE, AND ACCEPTANCE OF THIS NATIONWIDE PERMIT, AND
STATE WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION, INCLUDING ANY AND ALL STANDARD
AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS ATTACHED THERETO.
WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE INFORMATION SUBMITTED IN THIS
APPLICATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE.
APPLICANT'S SI NAT E
i
AGENT'S SIGNATURE
j® t/ cx-k
DATE
\ 02A. ato
DATE
Completion of this form will allow the agent to sign all future application correspondence.
LOOKING SOUTH (UPSTREAM) FROM GREENWAY TOWARDS GOLDSTON ST.
PHOTO TAKEN 9.21.96
PEENED

LOOKING DOWN FROM GREENWAY TOWARDS EXISTING OUTFALL.
PHOTO TAKEN 9.21.96

LOOKING DOWN AT EXISTING 48" RCP OUTFALL.
PHOTO TAKEN 9.21.96

LOOKING NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) FROM EXISTING OUTFALL.
PHOTO TAKEN 9.21.96
LOOKING FURTHER NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) FROM EXISTING OUTFALL.
PHOTO TAKEN 9.21.96
LOOKING CLOSER AT EXISTING 48" RCP OUTFALL FROM EAST TOB.
PHOTO TAKEN 9.21.96
011 C .7VLU I IVIY.7, IIVV.
NC Dept. of Environ. and Nat. Resources
Tran H Invoice Type Date Reference
9266 VilParkWetlancInvoice 10/06/06 Village Park Wetlands Certif:
too aIT II
Date
Check Number:
10/6/2006 Check Amt:
Balance Discount
$200.00 $0.00
upm Q5 19 0169 Do
OCT S 0 2006
WETLANDS AND T", ATER BRANCH
.l (.(4 I
17747
$200.00
Pay Amount
$200.00