20061895 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20060128

OF VqA
\O? RQG Michael F. Easley, Governor
0 7 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
> t_ North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
O ^C Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
401 Oversight/Express Review, Program Development and
Transportation Permitting Units
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
To: Scott Mitchell Fax #: [phone]
Company: Date: 1/26/07
From: DWQ/Wetlands/401 Unit
Number of pages including cover sheet: 5
Notes or special instructions: DWQ 06-1895 Hartford Hills Sanitary Sewer
None Carolina
Naturally
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone [phone] / Fax [phone]
Internet: http://h2o.enr.state:nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
? +
, 0? W a TF9
?CO? pG
r
? ^C
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
December 28, 2006
DWQ Project # 06-1895
County: Wake
Robert L. Massengill, Assistant Public Utilities Director
City of Raleigh
PO Box 590
Raleigh, NC 27602
Subject Property: Hartford Hills Sanitary Sewer
Turkey Creek [030402,27-33-2, C, NSW]
AUTHORIZATION of Neuse River Buffer Rule (15A NCAC 02B.0233) Authorization Certificate
Dear Mr. Massengill:
You have our authorization, in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0233 and any conditions listed below,
to impact approximately 1,007 ft2 of Zone 1 and 846 ft2 of Zone 2 of the protected riparian buffers for the
purpose of constructing the sanitary sewer line at the subject property as described within your
application dated December 8, 2006 and received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on December
8, 2006. In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local
permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment
Control, Non-discharge regulations.
This authorization is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change
your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is
sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this authorization letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions.. This authorization requires you to follow the conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:
Amount Approved Units Plan Location or Reference
Zone 1 Buffers 1,007 (square ft. Page 11 of PCN
Zone 2 Buffers 846 (square ft. Page 11 of PCN
2. Mitigation
You are required to mitigate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers. The required area of
mitigation to compensate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers is 1,007 square feet (ft) of
Zone 1 as required under this authorization and 15A NCAC 2B .0242. We understand that you
wish to make a payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund administered by the NC
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: hLtp•//h2o.enr state.nc us/ncwetlands
Nye Carolina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
City of Raleigh f .r
Page 2 of 3
December 28, 2006
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) to meet this mitigation requirement: Thig.has been
determined by the DWQ to be a suitable method to meet the mitigation requirement. In
accordance with 15A NCAC 2B .0242, this contribution will satisfy our compensatory mitigation
requirements under 15A NCAC 2B .0233(9)(C). Until the NC EEP receives and clears your
check (made payable to: DENR - Ecosystem Enhancement Program Office), no impacts
specified in this variance approval shall occur. Ms. Susan Klimek should be contacted at (919)
733-5205 if you have any questions concerning payment into the EEP: For accounting
purposes, this buffer authorization authorizes payment into the Riparian Buffer
Restoration Fund to compensate for 3,021 W of required riparian buffer mitigation for
impacts to 1,007 W of protected riparian buffers; 03020201 River Basin Cataloging Unit.
The DWQ will also accept an alternative method of mitigation (including but not limited to
Buffer Restoration or Enhancement) pursuant to the Buffer Mitigation Rule (15A NCAC 02B
.0242) to satisfy this mitigation requirement. If you choose to pursue this option, then you are
required to submit in writing a mitigation plan to the DWQ Wetlands/401 Unit for review and
approval. No impacts shall occur to the protected buffers until the mitigation plan is approved by
the DWQ.
3. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with.the reclamation in
accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
4. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond
the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction
activities, including the design, installation; operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion
control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality
standards, statutes, or rules occur.
5. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum
extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters
is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date
that the Division of Land Resources has released the project.

rPage 3 of 3
December 28, 2006
6. Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor'withih these
boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orarrge warning fencing
(or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved to infringe within the
buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure compliance with 15A
NCAC 2B.0233.
7. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within this authorization, and any subsequent
modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached certificate of completion to the 401
Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
8. Deed Notifications
Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands,
waters and protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer
impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or
buffers approved for impact under this Authorization Certificate. A sample deed notification can
be downloaded-from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands.
The text of the sample deed notification may be modified as appropriate to suit to this project.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved
buffer impacts) shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is
subject to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B. This Authorization Certificate shall
expire five (5) years from the date of this letter.
This letter completes the review of the "No Practical Alternatives" determination under 15A NCAC 2B
.0233. If you have any questions or would like a copy of the buffer rules, please call Amy Chapman at
[phone]. This letter does not authorize any impacts to either Waters of the United States or
Waters of the State. Please contact the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) or NC Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) if any impacts are proposed to either of these waters.
AW K/cbk/asc
Enclosures: Certificate of Completion
NCEEP Notification
cc: Mike Horan, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Filename: 061895HartfordHi11sSS(Wake)NBR
•'v
o?0? w H rF9 pG
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
401 Water Quality Certification
Summary of Permitted Impacts and Mitigation Requirements
in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0500, The City of Raleigh has permission as outlined below to impact 1,007
square feet (ft) of Zone 1 protected riparian buffers and 846 square feet (ft) of Zone 2 protected riparian buffers
for the purpose(s) of installing the sanitary sewer line at site on Pleasant Valley Road in Raleigh, Wake County.
All activities associated with these authorized impacts must be conducted with the conditions listed in the attached
Permit transmittal letter. THIS CERTIFICATION IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ATTACHMENTS.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS, ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
DWQ PROJECT #: 20061895
LOCATION: Raleigh, NC
COUNTY Wake
BASIN/ SUB BASIN Neuse/03020201
As required by 15A NCAC 2H.0500, and the conditions of this Certification and Neuse Buffer Authorization, you
are required to compensate for the Zone 1 mitigable buffer impacts through the restoration, creation, enhancement
or preservation of wetlands, surface waters and riparian buffers as outlined below prior to conducting any activities
that impact or degrade the waters of the state.
Note: Acreage requirements proposed to be mitigated through the Ecosystem Enhancement Program must be
rounded to one-quarter acre increments and linear foot requirements must be rounded up to the nearest
foot according to 15 2R.0503(b).
Impacts Mitigation
1,007 Square feet of Zone 1 riparian buffers 3,021 Square feet of Zone 1 riparian buffers
846 Square feet of Zone 2 riparian buffers 0 Square feet of Zone 2 riparian buffers
One of the options you have available. to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirement is through the payment of
a fee to the Wetlands Restoration Fund per NCAC 2R.0503. If you choose this option, please sign this form and
mail the form along with a copy of your Buffer Authorization to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program at the
address below. An invoice for the appropriate amount of payment will be sent to you upon receipt of this form.
PLEASE NOTE, THE ABOVE IMPACTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL YOU RECEIVE NOTIFICATION
THAT YOUR PAYMENT HAS BEEN PROCESSED BY THE ECOSYTEM ENHANCMENT PROGRAM.
Signature
Date
ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
1652 Mail Service Center
RALEIGH, N.C. 27699-1652
[phone]
Filename: 061895HartfordHillsSS(Wake)NBR EEP
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone [phone] / Fax [phone]
Internet: http://www.ncwaterquality.org
None Carolina
Ntura!!y
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
r?
.Ecosystem
PROGRAM
December 12, 2006
Robert Massengill
City of Raleigh
PO Box 590
Raleigh, NC 27602
Project: Hartford Hills Sanitary Sewer
off - ?$9S
WT F
Wed pFF,.
DEC L1 ? 2006
D6NR - WATER QUAL.i ;"+
*61 L&4D8 AND STORMWATFR GRMIcH
County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send
copies of the 404/401/CAMA permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or the 401
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
followine table.
River Basin Stream Impacts (feet) Wetlands Impacts (acres) Buffer I Buffer II
CU (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh
Neuse 0 0 20 0 0 0 1,045 872
03020201
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted impacts
up to a 2:1 mitigation-to-impact ratio, (buffers, Zone 1 at a 3:1 ratio and Zone 2 at a 1.5:1 ratio). The type and amount of the
compensatory mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 Permit and/or 401 Water Quality Certification, and/or
CAMA Permit. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
Sincerely,
Wi D. Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Monte Matthews, USACE-Raleigh
Eric Kulz, DWQ- Raleigh
Scott Mitchell, agent
File
kmtorl tg... E K&"... Prot"' Ott, ' .Matte,
RMENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net

2 0 0 6 1 8 9 5
Mitchell Environmental. P.A.
December 8, 2006
Mrs. Cyndi Karoly
NCDWQ - 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit D
2321 Crabtree Blvd. L D
Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 DEC 8 2 0 0 6
QUALIV
Re: Hartford Hills Sanitary Sewer - PCN Application for Proposed s h y e64 n'A t
Raleigh, North Carolina (Wake County- Veuse River Basin)
Mrs. Karoly:
Attached is a completed Pre-Construction Notification Application for the Hartford Hills Sanitary Sewer
project in Raleigh, NC (Wake County). This project proposes anew sanitary- sewer installation to eliminate
the use of the pump station presently on site. This project only requires impacts to protected Neuse
Buffers. No stream or wetland impacts are proposed for this project. Impacts to the Neuse Buffers are
unavoidable, as illustrated on the attached plans.
The purpose of this project is to replace an existing sanitary sewer pump station with a new section of
gravity sewer. This is made possible by a relatively new development downstream from the project site.
The proposed new section of gravity sanitary- sewer will flow into the existing gravity sanitary sewer
collection system downstream. According to the design engineer for this project, this pump station has a
history of failures.
The attached plans illustrate both existing conditions of the project site and the proposed alterations. As
stated above, the project site currently contains a sanitary sewer pump station, gravity supply lines, a force
main, utility line easements, a gravel drive to access the pump station, a section of piped stream channel
and multiple areas of rip-rap slope protection (see "F-risting Conditions" plan). Per 15A NCAC 02B .0233
(3)(b)(i), impacts to areas covered by the footprint of these existing uses are not included in the Neuse
Buffer impact table.
The design of this sanitary sewer system calls for the existing gravel access road and pump station
components to be removed and grassed. Although this area cannot be protected by a perpetual
conservation easement because it will be located in a City of Raleigh utility easement, we feel that the
removal of these impervious surfaces is worthy of Neuse Buffer enhancement credits. However, should
you disagree, we have submitted an In-Lieu Fee Request Form for proposed Neuse Buffer impacts to the
Ecosystem Enhancement Program to provide mitigation as required.
Thank you for your time spent reviewing this PCN Application. Please do not hesitate to call me if you
have any questions, comments or concerns about this project or if you need any additional information to
process the application.
Sincerely,..... _ .. _..,
Scott Mitchell, PE, LSS
602 East .4cadensy Street Suite 105 Fuquay-Varina, Aorth Carolina 27526
0
ffice: 919-557-1682 Fax: [phone] Afobile: 919-669-0329
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
2006 5
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
? Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: None-Neuse Buffer
Authorization Certificate
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: Z.
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), ch D 9@tDWr= D
II. Applicant Information
yE?t; 8 Z0U6
1. Owner/Applicant Informations iTY
Name: Robert. L. Massengill, Assistant Public Utilities Ditbglr
Mailing Address: PO Box 590
Raleigh, NC 27602
Telephone Number: 919-857-4540 Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Scott Mitchell
Company Affiliation: Mitchell Environmental P.A.
Mailing Address: 602 East Academy Street, Suite 105
FugM Varina, NC 27526
Telephone Number: 919-557-4682 Fax Number: 919-557-4683
E-mail Address: bsmenvironmentalkearthlink.net
III. Project Information
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 12
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Hartford Hills Sanitary Sewer
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): none
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0786483509
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Raleigh
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Take Interstate 440 to Exit
ght
7 and turn left onto Glenwood Avenue. Take a left onto Duraleiph Road and then a ri
onto Pleasant Valley Road. The project is located at the end of the road.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.8614°N 78.7183°W
6. Property size (acres): 21.73 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Turkey Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse River Basin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The existing; condition of this portion of the property is
forested.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Sanitary
sewer pipes will be installed to eliminate an existing pump station. Typical equipment that
will be used on site will be backhoes, dumptrucks, etc.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of this project is to eliminate the
pump station presently on site.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. There is no prior project history.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
The owner has no future plans that would require additional impacts.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: There are no proposed impacts to the
waters of the U.S. or waters of the state.
Updated 11/12005
Page 7 of 12
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
es/no Distance to
Nearest
Stream
linear feet Area of
Impact
(acres)
none

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.0
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
indicate on ma
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
linear feet Area of
Impact
acres
none

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 0 0
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma Name of Waterbody

(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,

ocean, etc. Area of
Impact

(acres)
none

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the proiect:
Stream Impact (acres): 0
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 12
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
none
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. As illustrated by the attached
site plan, impacts to the Buffer are unavoidable due to topographical constraints and existing
structures.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
Updated 11/112005
Page 9 of 12
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncNvetlands/strm,ide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Payment to the EEP is proposed for Neuse Buffer impacts.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/Nvrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): none
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 4.290 ft'
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): none
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): none
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): none
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ?
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 10 of 12
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify? Yes ® No ?
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 1,007 3 (2 for Catawba) 3,021
2 846 1.5 1,269
Total 1,853 4,290
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. Payment to Riparian Buffer Restoration
Fund is proposed for mitigation.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Impervious acreage will decrease as a result of
this project.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 11 of 12
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater will be generated by this project.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: There
will be no cumulative impacts resulting from this proposed project.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
I 2
Applicant/Agent's Signature ' Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 12 of 12
Nov 20 06 05:15p Carl Simmons 919-833-1926
NOV 17,2006 01:33P B. Scott Mitchel 5770875
B. Scott Mitchell Environmental Consulting
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
ALL BLANKS TO BE FILLED IN BY THE APPLICANT
Namc;
Address: o
g c,
Rhone: ?i M - EEO _ 44E5?
Project Name/Description: r+fo m d i IL
Date: WC?!,/?m be-j- 20, 7 ?Cc
The Department of the Army
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
PO Box 1890
Wilmington. NC 28402-1890
Attn: _.1GmlC 'JYIVryq .
Field Office: KoICIGiV1 Re U4.p?+r? FtefIj tff a e?,
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting & Permitting
To Whom It May Concem:
P. i
page 2

1, the cuaw applicant, hereby designate and authorize 13. Scott Mitchell Fnvironmental Consulting to
act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon mque t
supplemental information in support of applications, etc., from this day forward. This the Ra -
day of___/Ur)v.eApr aoo U _ ,
This notification superctdes any previous correspondence concerning the agent far this project.
-IL
PRINT Applicant's Name Applicant's' Signature
Cc: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NCI)F.NR - Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail S+:rvity Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
5601 Maggie Nun Lune Fuquay Varina, North Carolina 27520
Wice:919-357-4682 Fax: [phone] Mobile: 919-66Y-0329
13nv 9n 9nng nK. i qn
WAKE
Cou,N I Y

Hartford Hills
` 4 REID 0033420
:

OWNERI: AUTUMN RIDGE BANTA A
LLC AUTUMN RIDGE
BANTA B LLC
•` r ' - .?'''? l
" "" ' '
• ' ADDR1: 2089 FORT UNION BLVD
y r '' ADDR2: SALT LAKE CITY UT
84121-3135
j R
_ ? a f

- a F
rw :y 7
O
ADDR3:
DEED BOOK: 11955
DEED PAGE: 1073
DEED DATE: 5 /1 512 0 0 6
DEED ACRES: 21.73
BLDG VAL: 14333367
LAND VAL: 3184000
BILLING CLASS: CORPORATE LISTING
DESCRIPTION: PROP OF BROAD REACH
INV TR1 BM 1984-770
MAP NAME: 078606
PIN NUM: 0786483509
PIN EXT: 000
CITY: RAL
PLAN JURIS: RA
TOWNSHIP: HOUSE CREEK
YEAR BUILT: 1985
SALEPRICE: 25900000
SALEDATE: 5/15/2006
TYPE USE: Garden Apartments
DESIGN STYLE: Conventional
UNITS: 398
LAND CLASS: APARTMENT
OLD PARCEL NUMBER: 376-00000-0002
RALEIGH SITE ADDRESSES 1
STREET NUM: 6100
STREET SUITE:
STREET DIR PRE:
STREET NAME: BARROWOOD
STREET TYPE: DR
STREET DIR SUF:
ADDRESS TYPE: Parcel
ADDRESS STATUS ACTIVE
CODE DESCR:
Page 1 of 1
Streets
-! Parcels
Security Screen
2005 Color Orthos:
County-wide
2005 Color Ortho -
'
the
? Wake County
Boundary
Adjacent Counties
http://imaps.co.wake.nc.us/imapslprintmap.asp?pin=0786483509&pinext=&minX=2083140.16295749&... 12/1/2006
NTER
?.
wa-Q--,-o USGS I I A. I 'I
sc for a ,.r;hangiffig world U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
78145' 04 t •05 as 42 s'-
35 N >? Ses L`t ?r-
-,h
'72" N G -' -• z ?? - z5 is . 1? s - ;
Anne
"71 , ---- --- - - ?Q # .
- *? m - ?'=
17
ti - ice` ®4' °*® _ ? t
- 4 r ti
•` t-. , i ?'. .r , -fit,; rn t
t-4
iTATE YARIi
}
Wal,
?'??41'edy Creek
Lake
oM
25,
t-__--_-T-?-?--
50'j- r
• CEP I ????? ? ,i? r r ? `1 ?' _\ -
lip -
AIr' _
I TnnnZ.nne - 1 J9G9 Raleii7h West (NC) Tnnn Man
¦

.r''?8e [ i /?
4
.\
I

h:
Page 1 of 1
v.l V.c V.-.J P.4 0.5 km
I-
0 0.09 0.13 0.27 0.36 0.45 mi
35.86140N, 78.7183-W (NAD27)
USGS Raleigh West (NC) Quadrangle
Projection is UTM Zone 17 NAD83 Datum Pi
"? -

'• Sir - ? 1 1
- - j ,? :?-- .-+'•?- ti _?'? "moo. l` `v' 3?:, ?' i?, ??'
tf
t-'---_ .J.:'',r2n.,
e
J1j ` -CgC2
CeC2 cgc22
S WW F
f C882
CeD
\ CeF
CeC2
CeF
CgC2
ww
Z
AmC
CeC2 \' AgC2 !
s8 J v ` •t?
A
AgC2
` ?26?G?cJ' 1
II t
Age
AgC2 G?gCE
! Cgg2 / ".
APO
Cn AgC2 C-
_
wmE Cmt?,•? AgC2
AgC2 GeQ ?'.

J/// eO 4v4cE'.
AgCZ &U2
4;. C V Cg(:2
\ } APO APC2
`?\^-?? Cg821 82 ! AgC2 APD CeC2
CeF / M ` PO mE
f ) ! _
wkE. WkE CSC wkE
?, ? - - ? ! • ?Q ? ?, :••tF
dC2
CRC? \ CeO `,400 '
02
wkr
J
C_
31
Ire
y -- ?/ Q.?
ml.
LeF Y 1: ? L s : '?

_O
O
W
Zi
w
cO
V
C4
z
0
m
Z
N
W
z
m
D
m
N
W
d'
M?
0 m0 un$
oa ?
z
i?oW w
a?ac?
0
I I
a?
cz
u
CA
O
O
U
.X
w
x
b
S.r
t.Cl
cC
x
00
N
.-r
O
CC$
b
N
h
N N
r O
O ?
b
?J a
?a
?e
L?
a
G' N
N ?
C ri
cs a
:.1
Q ?
W
N
O
b
p
?O
V
"V
w
W
W
w
rrCw.?
-1
O

qq ; ;
S -A z
N
,'. iA? g4rt?

?
n
o??
4ZZ
oil N

yy
??
iC \I
1 lYY \ WO
Z 3Nh a
W
a
a
2
J
w
U
4
x x
x oi?,
I /-
r? .?..zz?1`1
L
z U.
Fw
a Lei i `; vJi
I1J
CY.
A.
o
0 a
Ob c ? ?n
i
!? z
WW j " vvi v
$? cr o oo
/ p aDO q? N HS
w W
zo zo
cr N N zzw
EL CID
to
3Nn :"
O
kn
II
U
CSS
U
C/1
cn
ca
N
dd
1-4
rn
N
O
N
V
110.
x
O
00
N
U
Q
N
n
N q
N
fi O
o e
e
u a
z
a
s ?
h
O?
1
? y
N b
`W
Cn [?
?a
J
h
N
0

Mitchell Environmental, P.A.
December 8, 2006
Mrs. Cyndi Karoly
NCDWQ - 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
2 0 0 6 1 8 x 5
RIM&NOW[Ro
DEC 8 2Q06
r'am ANQ stbt'CVW#tR 6KWi
Re: Hartford Hills Sanitary Sewer - PCN Application for Proposed Sanitary Sewer Installation
Raleigh, North Carolina (Wake Couno - Neuse River Basin)
Mrs. Karoly:
Attached is a completed Pre-Construction Notification Application for the Hartford Hills Sanitary Sewer
project in Raleigh, NC (Wake Counnl. This project proposes a new sanitary sewer installation to eliminate
the use of the pump station presently on site. This project only requires impacts to protected Neuse
Buffers. No stream or wetland impacts are proposed for this project. Impacts to the Neuse Buffers are
unavoidable, as illustrated on the attached plans.
The purpose of this project is to replace an existing sanitary sewer pump station with a new section of
gravity sewer. This is made possible by a relatively new development downstream from the project site.
The proposed new section of gravity sanitary sewer will flow into the existing gravity sanitary sewer
collection system downstream. According to the design engineer for this project, this pump station has a
history of failures.
The attached plans illustrate both existing conditions of the project site and the proposed alterations. As
stated above, the project site currently contains a sanitary sewer pump station, gravity supply lines, a force
main, utility line easements, a gravel drive to access the pump station, a section of piped stream channel
and multiple areas of rip-rap slope protection (see "Existing Conditions" plan). Per 15A NCAC 02B .0233
(3)(b)(i), impacts to areas covered by the footprint of these existing uses are not included in the Neuse
Buffer impact table.
The design of this sanitary sewer system calls for the existing gravel access road and pump station
components to be removed and grassed. Although this area cannot be protected by a perpetual
conservation easement because it will be located in a City of Raleigh utility easement, we feel that the
removal of these impervious surfaces is worthy of Neuse Buffer enhancement credits. However, should
you disagree, we have submitted an In-Lieu Fee Request Form for proposed Neuse Buffer impacts to the
Ecosystem Enhancement Program to provide mitigation as required.
Thank you for your time spent reviewing this PCN Application. Please do not hesitate to call me if you
have any questions, comments or concerns about this project or if you need any additional information to
process the application.
Sincerely--.- - --
Scott Mitchell, PE, LSS
602 East Academy Street Suite 103 Fuqua r-Yarnra. North Carolina 27526
Office: 919-557-4682 Fa-c: 919-557-4683 _1l6bile:919-669-0329
4
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
2006 1895
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
? Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: None-Neuse Buffer
Authorization Certificate
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed o age
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details)
H. Applicant Information S 2006
1. Owner/Applicant Information
UQ XU
Name: Robert. L. Masseneill, Assistant Public UtilitiesDirector, Citv of Ralei
Mailing Address: PO Box 590
Raleigh, NC 27602
Telephone Number: 919-8574540 Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Scott Mitchell
Company Affiliation: Mitchell Environmental, P.A.
Mailing Address: 602 East Academyytreet, Suite 105
Fuquay Varina, NC 27526
Telephone Number: 919-557-4682 Fax Number: 919-557-4683
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
III. Project Information
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 12
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Hartford Hills Sanitary Sewer
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): none
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0786483509
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Raleigh
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Take Interstate 440 to Exit
7 and turn left onto Glenwood Avenue. Take a left onto Duraleigh Road and then a right
onto Pleasant Valley Road. Theproiect is located at the end of the road.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.8614°N 78.7183°W
6. Property size (acres): 21.73 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Turkey Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse River Basin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The existing condition of this portion of the property is
forested.
Updated 111U2005
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Sanitary
sewer pipes will be installed to eliminate an existing_pump station. Typical equipment that
will be used on site will be backhoes dumptrucks etc
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of this project is to eliminate the
pump station presently on site
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. There is no prior project history.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
The owner has no future plans that would require additional impacts.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed; and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: There are no proposed impacts to the
waters of the U.S. or waters of the state.
Updated IIM2005
Page 7 of 12
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
senarately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet Area of
Impact
(acres)
none

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.0
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
indicate on ma
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or

Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
linear feet Area of
Impact
acres
none

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 0 0
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc. Area of
Impact
(acres)
none

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0
Updated 1111 /2005
Page 8 of 12
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
none
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. As illustrated by the attached
site plan, impacts to the Buffer are unavoidable due to topographical constraints and existing
structures.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 12
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/strmfide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Payment to the EEP is proposed for Neuse Buffer impacts.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/xvro/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): none
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 4,290 ft'
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): none
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): none
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): none
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ?
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
Updated I VV2005
Page 10 of 12
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes E] No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify-)? Yes ® No ?
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 1,007 3 (2 for Catawba) 3,021
2 846 1.5 1,269
Total 1,853 4,290
* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. Payment to Riparian Buffer Restoration
Fund is proposed for mitigation.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Impervious acreage will decrease as a result of
this proiect.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 11 of 12
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater will be generated by this project.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes E] No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/newetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: There
will be no cumulative impacts resulting from this proposed project.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
None
z b(
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 12 of 12
NYov 20 06 05:15p Carl Simmons
NOV 17,2006 01:33P B. Scott Mitchel
5770875
919-533-1926
B. Scott Mitchell Environmental Consulting
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
ALL BLANKS TO BE FILLED IN BY THE APPLICANT
•r
Name:
Address: o
Phone: q H - Ea--7- 4;54g7
Project Name/Description: r+fD m HAS
Date: _ I?cN?? hef 20, Zec?Co
The Department of the Army
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
PO Box 1890
Wilmington. NC 28402-1890
Attn: _TarniC `,?Ylurn
Fieldoffice: KOICIUk QU?p+DY? Fee (ff a c,
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting & Permitting
To Whom It May Concem:
P. 1
page 2

I, the current applicant, hereby designate and authorize D. Scott Mitchell Environmental Consulting to
act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit application% to furnish upon request
supplemental information in support of applications, etc., from this day forward. This the 2v'
day of_ Nc?ut.r. ?pr a cz? (? _?
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
PRINT Applicant's Name
Applicant's Signature
e
Cc: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
N( DF.NR - Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-2650
5601 Maggie Run Lune Fuquay Marina, Norlh Carolina 27526
ice: 919-557-4682 Far: 919-557-4683 Mobile: [phone]
mnv gn gnnti nq.,gn
Page 1 of l
1164E COUNY"F:AND 714E GtTY OF RALEIGH
WAKE
CQU ti l 1
Hartford Hills
%
''` REID: 0033420
~ AUTUMN RIDGE BANTA A Jr-
OWNER1: LLC AUTUMN RIDGE
BANTA B LLC
ADDR1: 2089 FORT UNION BLVD
SALT LAKE CITY UT
ADDR2: 84121-3135
Fem. ?' `7 d ADDR3:
sDEED BOOK: 11955
?15, DEED PAGE: 1073
?-- '-?-? DEED DATE: 5/15/2006
sue. r DEED ACRES: 21.73
BLDG VAL: 14333367
- r / LAND VAL: 3184000
BILLING CLASS: CORPORATE LISTING
PROP OF BROAD REACH
DESCRIPTION: INV TR1 BM1984-770
MAP NAME: 078606
PIN NUM: 0786483509
PIN EXT: 000
. , ? CITY: RAIL
PLAN 1URIS: RA
j TOWNSHIP: HOUSE CREEK
I - V`I s. •- ?'' ?? 1i„ YEAR BUILT: 1985
SALEPRICE: 25900000
?.0 o.
SALEDATE: 5!15/2006
tr TYPE USE: Garden Apartments
DESIGN STYLE: Conventional
•-+jr1111i /000w11UNITS: 398
'LAND CLASS: APARTMENT
tlwc R-? t OLD PARCEL NUMBER: 376-00000-0002
`? t r Y RALEIGH SITE ADDRESSES 1
him we STREET NUM: 6100
STREET SUITE:
STREET DIR PRE:
STREET NAME: BARROWOOD
STREET TYPE: DR
'? - a7 STREET DIR SUF:
*r ADDRESS TYPE: Parcel
ADDRESS STATUS
4 •' * "`"`?' CODE DESCR: ACTIVE
Map crew
C?
Streets
Parcels
Security Screen
2005 Color Orthos
County-wide
2005 Color Ortho
tile
? Wake County
Boundary
? Adjacent Counties
http://imaps.eo.wake.nc.us/imapslprintmap-asp?pin=0786483509&pinext=&minX=2083140.16295749&... 12/ 1 /2006
U S G S U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
SCIeMe fW a ch&Wiftg WDfM
78'45' 04-E 05 -06 42'30"
35'52'30 r - Ebc•rezer !r - -T-- -1 -- -- - _.r __
4W =
r 1 jakr ++- - L-.: r
Anve
°? __ _: So-- ? ¦ _ ,+ ? .s ? '? 'v
cem
IKE
170 - ---- ------ ? ?,_ ?A` ?
9,,T A. T E R A R X
QUat(Y }{,- w- JC ?AT
?y , f + ? - :??2zz?z
,??-?lfdy Creek
"
?57th 337 /? / / - - _ •_\;'i
. I t A _ r 3ia ! _ y `H
3967
?le?n?, We ,}•'y ?D _?
TopoZone - USGS Raleigh West (NQ Topo Map
Page 1 of 1
_.?:?,. t.. .. .... ?: ::............ ..+!':: .......w M.?l..... .....v..:..vw?v_ -re -'? r w:. - r_ c -
aa . v.. a .?,,, .. ...... w?..?... .w.. ... w ... .... . vw..?....... ...f a . rJ...?..:,:
S?euaulallgie I=-8.821
Projection is UTM Zone 17 NAD83 Datum -_1 33U
F, b4""'
14"" Mt.
Nor-
? ? ?V •+.._. ? `'?-?•- /, vr` i. Wit:=? ' `-.«;t't?4tr. _ , ..
- -tit?.?...2 ^es? - ^-•? i C.'_....'??`.°r-- ` ?r ,s . ? ji .`J,t ?;?s !? +1 _.
CeC2 Aa
cJC2
j fi CCCjjj P? AgC2 1 L8C2
/CeD
CeC2 Ce,2 aC Cg02 APO
Cn AgC2
Cg6
WwF g02 Ag82 cmm
C@B2 y
CeO / ... WmE Lr AgC2 . --
yl APO C `
CeF / eC2 2C2 PB -
P ' Cg.-
CgG2 Cg 82
S?°? c CeC2 Me C?2 AsC2 1 AgC2 r .0°?
Ags2
`AQ02 cgs2 . _;?
r S.! AgC2?? Cgd2
Wm
p Z \ AgC2 ApD . r AgC2
- \ / Agog j
CDt AM CgB
. APo\aPC2 , Z
CgB2 C 82 AgC2 \ ! APE
Coe
Tt 1 CeF
;r WkE WkE C8C WkE
-
t C2C2 V ?. CeD
Ag?
WkE!
'i /t eFl 3 AiRE -
"c
f ',??_` ? _ :• ? ;nom` ' :^\? \`. ? ?'' ? : ?_ ' - - _ 2 _ -
?i
0
ti
w
O
Z
OD
D
N
W
Er
n
OO
N O ?$
d
Z
d OJ :zW
aZE ao
O
N
ca
u
C/1
O
'C
O
bA
v]
.X
W
cn
x
'O

O
00
CV

b
N
n
N ON
Q M
r O
O b
U oe',
Z y,
r
.i
M
b
kr)
Ol
ti
o
v
?h
h
?a
Q c?
w ?
N
b
r-on
Z
V
O
r?1
Con
Z 3Nh
w? L
a
H
O O "? 1 ? J
..
?ggaii ? 7
'i'?+ \r u
\\\ Z
Ix
\..- _ r x O
?0 rr 4 z
LS
L ?
('`s? O
Z
p JN
[CS
U

f 3NI-1
N
N
?i
N
x
A1-C}C-1
I-LI

?

? m
V) (n
U
F .
w
o°xo e? W O

in co C)
to -8 W W
Z o
' a Z z
0=-w O N
?;.
N
Q
(
-
L 0

b
N
n
N Q`
ro
Ue
ti
.y
'T
(j h
h
a
h a
ti b
h
Q ?
Q' N
? U
N
b

2006 1895
Mitchell .Environmental, P.A.
December 8, 2006
Mrs. Cyndi Karoly D 11@90
NCDWQ - 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit D
2321 Crabtree Blvd. DEC 8®06
Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 ?isl P, . 9Fi . UA I
1
Re: Hartford Hills Sanitary Sewer - PCN Application for Proposed Sanitary Sewer Installation
Raleigh, North Carolina (Wake County- Neuse River Basin)
Mrs. Karoly
Attached is a completed Pre-Construction Notification Application for the Hartford Hills Sanitary Sewer
project in Raleigh, NC (Wake County). This project proposes a new sanitary sewer installation to eliminate
the use of the pump station presently on site. This project only requires impacts to protected Neuse
Buffers. No stream or wetland impacts are proposed for this project. Impacts to the Neuse Buffers are
unavoidable, as illustrated on the attached plans.
The purpose of this project is to replace an existing sanitary sewer pump station with a new section of
gravity sewer. This is made possible by a relatively new development downstream from the project site.
The proposed new section of gravity sanitary sewer will flow into the existing gravity sanitary sewer
collection system downstream. According to the design engineer for this project, this pump station has a
history of failures.
The attached plans illustrate both existing conditions of the project site and the proposed alterations. As
stated above, the project site currently contains a sanitary sewer pump station, gravity supply lines, a force
main, utility line easements, a gravel drive to access the pump station, a section of piped stream channel
and multiple areas of rip-rap slope protection (see "Existing Conditions" plan). Per 15A NCAC 02B .0233
(3)(b)(i), impacts to areas covered by the footprint of these existing uses are not included in the Neuse
Buffer impact table.
The design of this sanitary sewer system calls for the existing gravel access road and pump station
components to be removed and grassed. Although this area cannot be protected by a perpetual
conservation easement because it will be located in a City of Raleigh utility easement, we feel that the
removal of these impervious surfaces is worthy of Neuse Buffer enhancement credits. However, should
you disagree, we have submitted an In-Lieu Fee Request Form for proposed Neuse Buffer impacts to the
Ecosystem Enhancement Program to provide mitigation as required.
Thank you for your time spent reviewing this PCN Application. Please do not hesitate to call me if you
have any questions, comments or concerns about this project or if you need any additional information to
process the application.
Sincere)yr
Scott Mitchell, PE, LSS
602 East Academy Sn-eet Suite 105 Fuquav-Varina, North Carolina 27526
Office: 919-557-4682 Fax: [phone] llgobile:919-669-0329

Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
2006 1
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
? Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: None-Neuse Buffer
Authorization Certificate
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), f WF= D
II. Applicant Information U E ? 1 ?006
1. Owner/Applicant Information N?i R UU;, Lf i,
Name: Robert. L. Massenaill. Assistant Public Utiliti '?c t
Mailing Address: PO Box 590
Raleigrh, NC 27602
Telephone Number: 919-857-4540 Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Scott Mitchell
Company Affiliation: Mitchell Environmental P.A.
Mailing Address: 602 East Academy Street, Suite 105
Fuquay.Varina, NC 27526
Telephone Number: 919-557-4682 Fax Number: 919-557-4683
E-mail Address: bsmenvironmental@,earthlink.net
III. Project Information -
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 12

Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Hartford Hills Sanitary Sewer
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): none
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0786483509
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Raleigh
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Take Interstate 440 to Exit
7 and turn left onto Glenwood Avenue. Take a left onto Duraleigh Road and then a ri
ght
onto Pleasant Valley Road. The project is located at the end of the road.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.8614°N 78.7183°W
6. Property size (acres): 21.73 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Turkey Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse River Basin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application:. The existing condition of this portion of the property is
forested.
Updated 11/U2005
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Sanitary
sewer pipes will be installed to eliminate an existing _pump station. Typical equipment that
will be used on site will be backhoes, dumptrucks, etc.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of this project is to eliminate the
pump station presently on site.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. There is no prior project history.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
The owner has no future plans that would require additional impacts.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: There are no proposed impacts to the
waters of the U.S. or waters of the state.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 12

2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
es/no Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
none

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.0
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
indicate on ma
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
linear feet Area of
Impact
acres
none

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 0 0
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma Name of Waterbody

(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc. Area of
Impact
(acres)
none

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the proiect:
Stream Impact (acres): 0
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 12
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
none
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII, Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. As illustrated by the attached
site plan, impacts to the Buffer are unavoidable due to topographical constraints and existing
structures. .
VIII, Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 12
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
hLtp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Payment to the EEP is proposed for Neuse Buffer impacts.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): none
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 4,290 ftz
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): none
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): none
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): none
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ?
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you, are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
Updated 11/112005
Page 10 of 12
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ?
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* (s uImpct are feet) Multiplier M tig t ired
on
1 1,007 3 (2 for Catawba) 3,021
2 846 1.5 1,269
Total 1,853 4,290
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. Payment to Riparian Buffer Restoration
Fund is proposed for mitigation.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Impervious acreage will decrease as a result of
this project.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 11 of 12
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater will be generated by this project.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: There
will be no cumulative impacts resulting from this proposed project.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
None
17400/0 ?
Applicant/Agent's Signature I Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 12 of 12
+TUW a4i uo u;3:1;3p uari Simmons 51il-eui-19e6
NOV 17,2006 01:33P 8. Scott Mitchel 5770875
B. Scott Mitchell LFnvironmental Consulting
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
ALL BLANKS TO BE FILLED IN BY THE APPLICANT
Name:
Address: o
. pc? v
Phone: 510 - 96-7- 4-7-54 ej
Project Nerne/Description: &r+fo
Date: NU,r?m f?Qt Zo, Z--o&
The Department of the Army
US Army Corps of Enders
Wilmington District
PO Box 1x40
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
Attn: _70MIC ` y1t)rn
FieldOfft'ce: Kolcluh 1
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting & Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
(? . 1
page 2

I, the currant applicant, hereby daigttateand authorize B. Scott Mitchell Environmental Consulting to
=t on my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request
supplemental information in support of applications, etc„ from this day forward. This the ;?o day of /l?e)u•e.,., ? -e- p OO to
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concern ing the agent lbr this proiect.
i'R INT Applicant's Name Applicant's Signature
Cc: Ms. Cyndi Kamly
NCi)F.NR - Division of Water Quality
40) Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Servisx Center
Raleigh. NC 27699-1654
5601 uetggie Run Lune Fugtury Marina, North Carolina 27526
CWICC:919-557-4681 F=: 919-557-4663 Mobile: 919-66Y-0319
Nnv gn gnnti nr.,gn
WAKE COUNTY AND THE CITY OF RALEIGI
WAKE
tet)Uti I Y
Hartford Hills
wry- : k r Yvk-?

'I I2,
Parcel! ?,r ! - 2?Ob
REID: 0033420
AUTUMN RIDGE BANTA A
OWNER1: LLC AUTUMN RIDGE
BANTA B LLC
ADDR1: 2089 FORT UNION BLVD
ADDR2: SALT LAKE CITY UT
84121-3135
ADDR3:
DEED BOOK: 11955
DEED PAGE: 1073
DEED DATE: 5/15/2006
DEED ACRES: 21.73
BLDG VAL: 14333367
LAND VAL: 3184000
BILLING CLASS: CORPORATE LISTING
DESCRIPTION: PROP OF BROAD REACH
INV TR1 BM1984-770
MAP NAME: 078606
PIN NUM: 0786483509
PIN EXT: 000
CITY: RAL
PLAN JURIS: RA
TOWNSHIP: HOUSE CREEK
YEAR BUILT: 1985
SALEPRICE: 25900000
SALEDATE: 5/15/2006
TYPE USE: Garden Apartments
DESIGN STYLE: Conventional
UNITS: 398
LAND CLASS: APARTMENT
OLD PARCEL NUMBER: 376-00000-0002
RALEIGH SITE ADDRESSES 1
STREET NUM: 6100
STREET SUITE:
STREET DIR PRE:
STREET NAME: BARROWOOD
STREET TYPE: DR
STREET DIR SUF:
ADDRESS TYPE: Parcel
ADDRESS STATUS ACTIVE
CODE DESCR:
Page 1 of 1
Streets
Parcels
Security Screen
2005 Color Orthos:
County-wide
2005 Color Ortho -
tile
? Wake County
Boundary
11 Adjacent Counties
http://imaps.co.wake.nc.us/imapslprintmap.asp?pin=0786483509&pinext=&minX=2083140.16295749&... 12/1/2006
U.S. DUPS. G OLOGICALTH{E INTERIOR
ARTMENT U S G S .
science fw a changing WDM
78'46' 05 _ -OS
35 52'30' ?beoezef+cs?
?_ ';• i -.- `, it ?. ` --
o-' 1 r E 1 3 i °-
\ ,? --------- ? - - ? --ter ?-7i'ne ? s
' ?F. ;l ?. c?Yff]T(t0 _?/ - -7 w s=ue _
X70 -- ------------- ---- _._. - - - - _- _s: ?-? °_ -
W IL--LIAM- =3 MSTEAD
Quarry
Reedy (reek i ` - ---- ---- '
Lade ._ ?_ _ 3>
257
3 3
so,
A67 i--
-- t-=
K?leiq? W6? Vic
42'80'

c
r -_
%dr
TopoZone - USGS Raleigh West (NQ Topo Map
Page 1 of 1
7, n n
•••?.?? F%04=1911 VVCbL tINO.) quaarangie M=-8.821
Projection is UTM Zone 17 NAD83 Datum J=_1.338
LOC
IN VW TW V-?-NOWO-15 "4
to,
-.P wer,. - [ * [ r4E=R" ,.=?. r -
?/, P) rr?t yr `BV ?E // ASC1
34 \\\ CgC? "CO Zfit t fi PQ ASC2 C ` J
/ i
/ CeC2 Cgc,) BC' Ny ; `CgB2
\LaF RS! a?rfLA?jlt i'
AYB2 Cn AgC2
= t,m!
C8B2 w m
C S
CeD .. ;?., ApO
r ) -? ` ? < FbC
^.ef CeC C8?
2
EC2 82
yi?t W cl VC2 ' Me - CHCZ ASCZ .`. ^\ AZC2 0 ---
eD ?.; l A 9'r A 9\i CC 82J `
J

CgB? ,
c.
4 Wkf:
L
NXi
AQC2 APD ?AgC-t-
S2 B.
Apo AvC2
CeC2
ri C\C2 WkE
,
? IN E
1 = L
-
c4p
LeF
C?
?.j
Alan

B. Scott Mitchell Environmental Consulting
PROPOSED
M.H.
POINT 1 873
GLENWOOD FOREST SUB'N
N. C. ONO COOK.
N 76MI.{2
E 20&MM40
Date: 12/8/06 Hartford Hills- Existing Conditions Scale V= 50'
602 East Academy Street Suite 105 Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina 27526
Office: 919-557-4682 Fax: [phone] Mobile: [phone]
B. Scott Mitchell Environmental Consulting

Date: 12/8/06 Hartford Hills- Zones 1 & 2 Areas Scale 1"= 50'
602 East Academy Street Suite 105 Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina 27526
Office: 919-557-4682 Fax: [phone] Mobile: [phone]

Mitchell Environmental, P.A.
December 8, 2006
20061895
Mrs. Cyndi Karoly
NCDWQ - 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
DEC a[9@29WIMP
8 2006
111! ,.,.. , ..
Re: Hartford Hills Sanitary Sewer - PCN Application for Proposed Sanitary Sewer Installation
Raleigh, North Carolina (Wake County- :-euse River Basin)
Mrs. Karoly:
Attached is a completed Pre-Construction Notification Application for the Hartford Hills Sanitary Sewer
project in Raleigh, NC (Wake Counn). This project proposes a new sanitary- sewer installation to eliminate
the use of the pump station presently on site. This project only requires impacts to protected Neuse
Buffers. No stream or wetland impacts are proposed for this project. Impacts to the Neuse Buffers are
unavoidable, as illustrated on the attached plans.
The purpose of this project is to replace an existing sanitary sewer pump station with a new section of
gravity sewer. This is made possible by a relatively new development downstream from the project site.
The proposed new section of gravity sanitary sewer will flow into the existing gravity sanitary sewer
collection system downstream. According to the design engineer for this project, this pump station has a
history of failures.
The attached plans illustrate both existing conditions of the project site and the proposed alterations. As
stated above, the project site currently contains a sanitary sewer pump station, gravity supply lines, a force
main, utility line easements, a gravel drive to access the pump station, a section of piped stream channel
and multiple areas of rip-rap slope protection (see "FYisting Conditions" plan). Per 15A NCAC 02B .0233
(3)(b)(i), impacts to areas covered by the footprint of these existing uses are not included in the Neuse
Buffer impact table.
The design of this sanitary sewer system calls for the existing gravel access road and pump station
components to be removed and grassed. Although this area cannot be protected by a perpetual
conservation easement because it will be located in a City of Raleigh utility easement, we feel that the
removal of these impervious surfaces is worthy of Neuse Buffer enhancement credits. However, should
you disagree, we have submitted an In-Lieu Fee Request Form for proposed Neuse Buffer impacts to the
Ecosystem Enhancement Program to provide mitigation as required.
Thank you for your time spent reviewing this PCN Application. Please do not hesitate to call me if you
have any questions, comments or concerns about this project or if you need any additional information to
process the application.
Sincerely,.,..
Scott Mitchell, PE, LSS
602 East .4 cademi, Sn-eet Suite 103 Fuqum?-farina, !orth Carolina 27526
Office: 919-557-4682 Far: 919-557-4683 -Wobile:919-669-0329
Office Use Only: 2 O OFor ; Version 9March505
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
? Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: None-Neuse Buffer
Authorization Certificate
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), ch D
D 0'6
II. Applicant Information 1k DF
C s Za?6
Owner/Applicant Information DEW: V I ?p ?. ' , My
Name: Robert. L. Massenaill, Assistant Public Utilities D?.1f
Mailing Address: PO Box 590
Raleigh, NC 27602
Telephone Number: 919-857-4540 Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Scott Mitchell
Company Affiliation: Mitchell Environmental P.A.
Mailing Address: 602 East Academy Street, Suite 105
Fuquay Varina, NC 27526
Telephone Number: 919-557-4682 Fax Number: 919-557-4683
E-mail Address: bsmenvironmentalkearthlink.net
III. Project Information m
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 12
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Hartford Hills Sanitary Sewer
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): none
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0786483509
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Raleigh
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Take Interstate 440 to Exit
ght
7 and turn left onto Glenwood Avenue. Take a left onto Duraleigh Road and then a ri
onto Pleasant Valley Road. The project is located at the end of the road.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.8614°N 78.7183°W
6. Property size (acres): 21.73 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Turkey Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse River Basin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at hllp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The existing condition of this portion of the pLopprty is
forested.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Sanitary
sewer pipes will be installed to eliminate an existing _pump station. Typicalequipment that
will be used on site will be backhoes, dumptrucks, etc.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of this project is to eliminate the
pump station presently on site.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. There is no prior project history.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
The owner has no future plans that would require additional impacts.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: There are no proposed impacts to the
waters of the U.S. or waters of the state.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 12
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year
Floodplain Nearest
Stream Impact
(acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) es/no) (linear feet
none

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.0
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
indicate on ma
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial Intermittent?
? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
linear feet Area of
Impact
acres
none

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 0 0
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma Name of Waterbody

(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
acres
none

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 12
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
none
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. As illustrated by the attached
site plan, impacts to the Buffer are unavoidable due to topographical constraints and existing
structures.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9of12
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Payment to the EEP is proposed for Neuse Buffer impacts.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wlp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): none
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 4,290 ft2
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): none
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): none
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): none
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ?
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 10 of 12
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify)? Yes ® No ?
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multiuliers. Required
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Mitigation
1 1,007 3 (2 for Catawba) 3,021
2 846 1.5 1,269
Total 1,853 4,290
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. Payment to Riparian Buffer Restoration
Fund is proposed for miti aR tion.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Impervious acreage will decrease as a result of
this project.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 11 of 12
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater will be generated by this project.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: There
will be no cumulative impacts resulting from this proposed project.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
None
l?'M AU_ y ikVW**J I? 18 In Ce
Applicant/Agent's Signature Da e
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 12 of 12
NOV 20 U5 U5:15P Carl 51mmons 919-833-1926 p.1
NOV 17,2006 01:33P B. Scott Mitchel 5770875 page 2
B. Scott 111'itchell Environmental Consulting
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
ALL BLANKS TO BE FILLED IN BY THE APPLICANT
Name: fG
Addrew o
?.... _.5xo..............
1"1 G-_ 276 0
Phone: 6i tq - n6-7 -
Project Namelikseription: Harr#ard H i lis
Date: _ KICger l bef 2a. CP
The Department of the Army
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
Attn: Tc ruin ` y1urn
c f?
field Office: K lc 1 Cc. !'1 c t bry rkdc off,
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting & Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
1, the cunvnt applicant, hereby designate and authorize B. Scott Mitchell Environmental Consulting to
act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request
supplemental information in support of applications, etc., &orn this day forward. This the 2 v
day of Mou-e.., ?-r aoC>(y
'this notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent lbr this proiect.
5,4
,mss
i
'RMT Applicant's Name Applicant's Signature
Cc: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Nt l)F, VR - Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1654 Mail Sctvi(w Center
Raft, NC 27699-1650
5601 Maggie Run Lucre Fuquay farina, North Carolina 27526
(Wice:919-557-4682 Fax: [phone] Mobile: 919-66Y.0329
NnV go ?nnti nS.,SD
Page 1 of 1
;
WAKE COUNTY AN0 THE CITY OF RALEIGH

?VNAKE
(A)UN I Y
Hartford Hills
Pare, Vinm r
REID: 0033420
AUTUMN RIDGE BANTA A
OWNERI: LLC AUTUMN RIDGE
BANTA B LLC
ADDR1: 2089 FORT UNION BLVD
ADDR2: SALT LAKE CITY UT
84121-3135
ADDR3:
DEED BOOK: 11955
DEED PAGE: 1073
DEED DATE: 5/15/2006
DEED ACRES: 21.73
BLDG VAL: 14333367
LAND VAL: 3184000
BILLING CLASS: CORPORATE LISTING
DESCRIPTION: PROP OF BROAD REACH
INV TR1 BM1984-770
MAP NAME: 078606
PIN NUM: 0786483509
PIN EXT: 000
CITY: RAL
PLAN JURIS: RA
TOWNSHIP: HOUSE CREEK
YEAR BUILT: 1985
SALEPRICE: 25900000
SALEDATE: 5/15/2006
TYPE USE: Garden Apartments
DESIGN STYLE: Conventional
UNITS: 398
LAND CLASS: APARTMENT
OLD PARCEL NUMBER: 376-00000-0002
RALEIGH SITE ADDRESSES 1
STREET NUM: 6100
STREET SUITE:
STREET DIR PRE:
STREET NAME: BARROWOOD
STREET TYPE: DR
STREET DIR SUF:
ADDRESS TYPE: Parcel
ADDRESS STATUS ACTIVE
CODE DESCR:
Streets
?i Parcels
Security Screen
2005 Color Orthos:
County-wide
2005 Color Ortho -
tile
Wake County
Boundary
? Adjacent Counties
http://imaps.co.wake.nc.us/imapslprintmap.asp?pin=0786483509&pinext=&minX=2083140.16295749&... 12/1/2006
ap created on 1211/2006 10:56:39 AM.
opyright 2006. City of Raleigh, Wake Cou- 0
5,22- usub U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE I
s?r`e i!? a s?ngi? ;??r>#>fl' it
78045' 04ffi L 05 _ '06 42'303'
3 52°3C' 3 ?nezef`CN.;? r ? --? _ y ?c,Sczc-.r.?- Yl a r ?
! - __, - ? _ _ r -a??=
414,
• .fie ? ??? ? __ ,- --- -
_1)C'7'SS
All I
"Ifs -- ---- -------- ------- ---- %t - -
T°
STE AD
-L I -A -Xi B
-? - - - ii' Quarry
\?_ F . I
t - }-- _ -
{ ?- a ademc
y Creek
257, - ----------------
i
-T ?
50, F
I
TopoZone - USGS Raleigh West (NQ Topo Map
Page 1 of 1
.• ..v w.av. Na..a •. ?.?y ... w..a?v aw-.. a a acv ... ar a . r -.
U.-Amb Kaleign wif esi (NLj quaarangie i1=-8.821
Projection is UTM Zone 17 NAD83 Datum _ -1.338

C - -
-
-
et?? 1 C k
Ja?Ji AgCL
CgCa CeD C&c2? ?r PO AgC2 CBC= A-
ceca ? - CgC2
- ? 82
WY APO
Cn AgC2r
'WwF g82 AVB2 Cg6, -
CeD CgB2 Wm Cm lr''' AHC2
APD PBG
C C I
g
i _ CeF CeC2
CgC2 ` .... P \ g;
9 Cet- - Cg82
c s°? c CgC2 Me C9C2 AgC2 } AgC2 GAO `.\ 1 11
Ag8 A,g82 r C BZ
L ^ ?? r C
t \ \ j.i AgC2 Cg82 e ?j \
Ge
Wm
AgC A4C2 ApD . r AgC2 C? Y
,Z.e r CgC2 CgC21 y V
g CeF A
Apo ADC2 n
CgB2 . C 62 l A9C2 f Ap CeC2 _ Y*
CeF \ Ap \yV nE
F ?f
± C ?\ •• E
WkE : ' WkE CBC ME
i
a
-,
c
-
CgC2 i ` ?\`A t GYM
Cg82 ?' _ 3ry = ?
31 f iCM _
' = 1 - ?\ .... r ``,rte` , -? f-.. ?_v 9 - , .. ? ": ..? .•?
B. Scott Mitchell Environmental Consulting
PROPOSED
M.H. /
POINT 873
GLENW6OD FOREST SUB'N
N. C. ORIO COOR.
N 766551.44
E 4063655.40
Date: 12/8/06 Hartford Hills- Existing Conditions Scale 1"= 50'
602 East Academy Street Suite 105 Fuguay-Varina, North Carolina 27526
Office.- 919-557-4682 Fax: [phone] Mobile: [phone]
B. Scott Mitchell Environmental Consulting
IS DIVERTED
Date: 12/8/06 Hartford Hills- Zones 1 & 2 Areas Scale 1"= 50'
602 East Academy Street Suite 105 Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina 27526
Ofjttce:919-557-4682 Fax: [phone] Mobile: [phone]
Mitchell Environmental, P.A.
2006 1895
December 8, 2006
Mrs. Cyndi Karoly D @ D
NCDWQ - 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd. DEC 0
Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Re: Hartford Hills Sanitary Sewer - PCN Application for Proposed Sanitary Sewer Installation
Raleigh, North Carolina (Wake Cou?tty- Meuse River Basin)
Mrs. Karoly
Attached is a completed Pre-Construction Notification Application for the Hartford Hills Sanitary Sewer
project in Raleigh, NC (Wake County). This project proposes a new sanitary sewer installation to eliminate
the use of the pump station presently on site. This project only requires impacts to protected Neuse
Buffers. No stream or wetland impacts are proposed for this project. Impacts to the Neuse Buffers are
unavoidable, as illustrated on the attached plans.
The purpose of this project is to replace an existing sanitary sewer pump station with a new section of
gravity sewer. This is made possible by a relatively new development downstream from the project site.
The proposed new section of gravity sanitary- sewer will flow into the existing gravity sanitary sewer
collection system downstream. According to the design engineer for this project, this pump station has a
history of failures.
The attached plans illustrate both existing conditions of the project site and the proposed alterations. As
stated above, the project site currently contains a sanitary sewer pump station, gravity supply lines, a force
main, utility line easements, a gravel drive to access the pump station, a section of piped stream channel
and multiple areas of rip-rap slope protection (see "Existing Conditions" plan). Per 15A NCAC 02B .0233
(3)(b)(i), impacts to areas covered by the footprint of these existing uses are not included in the Neuse
Buffer impact table.
The design of this sanitary sewer system calls for the existing gravel access road and pump station
components to be removed and grassed. Although this area cannot be protected by a perpetual
conservation easement because it will be located in a City of Raleigh utility easement, we feel that the
removal of these impervious surfaces is worthy of Neuse Buffer enhancement credits. However, should
you disagree, we have submitted an In-Lieu Fee Request Form for proposed Neuse Buffer impacts to the
Ecosystem Enhancement Program to provide mitigation as required.
Thank you for your time spent reviewing this PCN Application. Please do not hesitate to call me if you
have any questions, comments or concerns about this project or if you need any additional information to
process the application.
Sincerelr-
Scott Mitchell, PE, LSS
602 East.4cademy Street Suite 105 Fuqum barina, :forth Carolina 27526
Office: 919-557-4682 Far: 919-537-1683 M6bile: 919-669-0329
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
2006 1895
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
? Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: None-Neuse Buffer
Authorization Certificate
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ®.
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), ch -
10 1
II. Applicant Information 19
L Owner/Applicant Information W041h "'#*I.. H ? C,f
Name: Robert. L. Massenaill. Assistant Public Utilities Dim. d+n
Mailing Address: PO Box 590
Raleigh, NC 27602
Telephone Number: 919-857-4540 Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Scott Mitchell
Company Affiliation: Mitchell Environmental P.A.
Mailing Address: 602 East Academy Street, Suite 105
Fuquay Varina, NC 27526
Telephone Number: 919-557-4682 Fax Number: 919-557-4683
E-mail Address: bsmenvironmentalkearthlink.net
III. Project Information
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 12
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in, relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the fall-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Hartford Hills Sanitary Sewer
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): none
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0786483509
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Raleigh
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Take Interstate 440 to Exit
7 and turn left onto Glenwood Avenue. Take a left onto Duraleigh Road and then a ri
ght
onto Pleasant Valley Road. The project is located at the end of the road.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.8614°N 78.7183°W
6. Property size (acres): 21.73 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Turkey Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse River Basin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at h1tp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/map2/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The existing condition of this portion of the property is
forested.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:Sanitary
sewer pipes will be installed to eliminate an existing pump station. Typical equipment that
will be used on site will be backhoes, dumptrucks, etc.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of this project is to eliminate the
pump station presently on site.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. There is no prior project history.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
The owner has no future plans that would require additional impacts.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: There are no proposed impacts to the
waters of the U.S. or waters of the state.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 12
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
se aratel list impacts due to both structure and flood' .
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
( es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet Area of
Impact
(acres)
none

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.0
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
indicate on ma
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
linear feet Area of
Impact
acres
none

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 0 0
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
hcable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)
none

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 12
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
none
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. As illustrated by the attached
site plan, impacts to the Buffer are unavoidable due to topographical constraints and existing
structures.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 12
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Payment to the EEP is proposed for Neuse Buffer impacts.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wr2/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): none
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 4,290 ft'
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): none
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): none
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): none
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ?
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 10 of 12
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify-)? Yes ® No ?
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers. ire Zone* (s uare feet Multiplier Mitig t on

1 1,007 3 (2 for Catawba) 3,021
2 846 1.5 1,269
Total 1,853 4,290
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. Payment to Riparian Buffer Restoration
Fund is proposed for mitigation.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Impervious acreage will decrease as a result of
this project.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 11 of 12
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater will be generated by this project.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (I 5A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: There
will be no cumulative impacts resulting from this proposed project.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
2
Applicant/Agent's Signature ' Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 12 of 12
NOV eU U5 U5:15p Carl Simmons 919-833-1926
NOV 17,2006 01:33P B. Scott Mitchel 5770875
B. Scott Mitchell Environmental Consulting
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
ALL BLANKS TO BE FII.I.ED IN BF THE APPLICANT
Namc;
Address: o
?+ ,_??-- 2-IGC? Z
Phone:
Project Name/Desc6ption: rirfn fd?
Date: _ McT/er n ber zo. 7co&
The Department of the Army
US Antsy Corps of Engineers
Witmington District
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 21402-1890
Attn: _ Tg -m1 c `.?Yi V T n
Field office: Kl 1C 1 ak 1Rea -bry FteW Wa e:,
Re: Wetlands Rotated Consulting & Permitting
To Whom It May Conc em:
P. 1
page 2
D trc?i?
1, the eustrnt applicant, hereby designate and authorize B. Scott Mitchell Environmental Consulting to
curt on my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applicatiom% to furnish upon request
supplemental information its support of applications, etc., from this day forward. This the Ra
day of Mayl.+n ?pr apo(.o
This notification supersedes any previous corre"nderwe concerning the agent l'ar this project.
r?obe? !G. ??'Ir1 ssr.?5'
r?55.Sf/}n7 7?'u?sf?,t U?e l?r nt f7??r?1'oi
k NTApplicant's Name Applicant's Signature
Cc: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NCI)h;NR - Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Sarvice Center
Raleigh. NC 27694-1650
5601 Maggie Run Lane Fuquay Yrrrinu, North t.'arolina 1752!
Wier>:919-557-4682 pone: 911-Ss7-4683 Mobile: [phone]
wnir 7n ?nnti n,.1 qTJ
Page 1 of 1
WAKE COUNTY AND THE CITY OF RALEIGH
WAKE
C0LIN I Y
Hartford Hills
..r

I-r 5

J Y l
Streets
0106* -j' REID: 0033420 - --
Parcels
+
? AUTUMN RIDGE BANTA A
•
A OWNERI: LLC AUTUMN RIDGE Security Screen
BANTA B LLC 2005 Color Orthos:
ADDR1: 2089 FORT UNION BLVD County-wide
ADDR2: SALT LAKE CITY UT
84121-3135
S1
r ` ADDR3: 2005 Color Ortho -
:
s,
DEED BOOK:
11955
tile
DEED PAGE: 1073
DEED DATE: 5/15/2006 Wake County
-DEED ACRES: 21.73
Boundary

. T• a BLDG VAL: 14333367

_ -/ _
LAND VAL:
3184000 ? Adjacent Counties
BILLING CLASS: CORPORATE LISTING

DESCRIPTION: PROP OF BROAD REACH
INVTRI BM 1984-770
MAP NAME: 078606
PIN NUM: 0786483509
PIN EXT: 000
CITY: RAIL

f PLAN JURIS: RA
TOWNSHIP: HOUSE CREEK
* YEAR BUILT: 1985
SALEPRICE: 25900000
SALEDATE:
TYPE USE: 5/15/2006
Garden Apartments
a DESIGN STYLE: Conventional
UNITS: 398
LAND CLASS: APARTMENT
OLD PARCEL NUMBER: 376-00000-0002
RALEIGH SITE ADDRESSES 1
STREET NUM: 6100
STREET SUITE:
6 . STREET DIR PRE:
STREET NAME: BARROWOOD
>F¢ ? ' STREET TYPE: DR
'' - STREET DIR SUF:
ADDRESS TYPE: Parcel

;? .. ADDRESS STATUS
c CODE DESCR:
ACTIVE
http://imaps.co.wake.nc.us/imapslprintmap.asp?pin=0786483509&pinext=&minX=2083140.16295749&... 12/1/2006
L.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
MUSGS
U.S. GEOLOGICAL
78 045' 04'r_ 05 'os arao'
35'52'30' ;
f } '- - - -- -- r, '• •ti ` Od`e`, ? ... s .-,?, s
\ y . r,
w7l
pi.
I
Gik*
-- - - - - - -----------
?. ay c
- -! ?? - WF<"i I
Quarry
Wake
}
-.?f8(y freed ?'? - .. -------- ¢- r,
?
257
_ - -" :? ? - ? ??L 3i :tea'- _--•- '
.7 55,
r
p67
JV0 :
.r ?'J ? i n ? lU iL•tS L ^l'U 1L L/CS•?L 'tic, ?- f - '.. _ ••. -.
9CC'Z=9 wn4ea £8C]VN LT auoZ Wln s, uoliaafold
T29*9-=W ajfi P-fDP"?% f1#i1'1caAA Il ila1ov 4r%d--e%
13o I a$Ed
dt,W odoZ (DN) Isam uSpp-d S )SIl - auozodo j,
VzAte''.. ..t `\ J / ?`?f:' h-• ?l^ ?? _r
_ , - AgGl Ce
CgC2 41a C¢E F ct.?. ASC2 ! 1 K ,. s? P i h _
a'? L CeD CgC2--?"
- -
- \ g 2 ,
CHC. \ gC2 CB
y?Y APO
tdwF J Cg6 Ag82 Cn q 2
\ 4r,2 ti -
1
- CeD Cg62 ` , - ?? WmE Cmf.r"? AgC2 \ -
CgC2 APD PSG
CeF f--C2
CgC2 ?~ p Ca`
Cer CgB2
f - sf°? c CgC2 Me CgC2 ABC2 AgC2 GOB \ t
'ED \ A$82 A9132 C?182 \?+
E C a_ -
AgC2 C&82 - $ --- ti?
f, WmAe AgC2 APD.•1 AgC2 \ cet2 Ge
ae' CgC2 '2 1¢?
CeF
AF82
APO AAC2 -
C C662 82 AgC2 BPD CeC2 1.
CeF D -
P m? '
i
N'kE WkE CgC WkE '. _ .
CgC2 G ?. Ce 'D-- Yk t
-
8
02
4
r
\ ti .
t _
C
c \1
- ?.-
cc?
n
I^
B. Scott Mitchell Environmental Consulting
PROPOSED
M.H.
POINT # 873
GLENWOOD FOREST SUB'N
N. C. GRID COOR.
N 788551.12
E 20830.75.10
Date: 12/8/06 Hartford Hills- Existing Conditions Scale 1"= 50'
602 East Academy Street Suite 105 Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina 27526
Office: 919-557-4682 Fax: [phone] Mobile: [phone]
B. Scott Mitchell Environmental Consulting
IS DIVERTED
Date: 12/8/06 Hartford Hills- Zones 1 & 2 Areas Scale 1"= 50'
602 East Academy Street Suite 105 Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina 27526
Office: 919-557-4682 Fax: [phone] Mobile: [phone]