WQCS00002_DV-2018-0068_20181029

rt} ,
A�.
ROY COOPER
GOWrnor Envrronmentat t2ao&t�
.MICHAEL S.REGAN
JdCXfrW
LLND A CLZ.PE?PER © /! (�f®� p
;r.:drirrc Jarscror RECEIVED/DENR/DWR'
Certified Mail#7017 2680 0000 2236 2189 NO V j 3 2018
Return Receipt Requested
'Water Resources
October 29, 2018 Permitting Section
Robert Massengill,Director Public Utilities
City of Raleigh
One Exchange Plaza Ste 620
Raleigh,NC 27601
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil Penalty
for Violations of North Carolina General Statute(G.S.) 143-215.1(a)(6)
and Collection System Permit No. WQCS00002
City of Raleigh
Raleigh Collection System
Case No. DV-2018-0068
Wake County
Dear Mr.Massengill:
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and assessment of civil penalty in the amount of$532.36 ($500.00 civil penalty+
$32.36 enforcement costs)against City of Raleigh.
This assessment is based upon the following facts: a review has been conducted of the Sanitary Sewer Overflow(SSO)
5-Day Reports and the NOV response submitted by the City of Raleigh. This review has shown the subject facility to be in
violation of the requirements found in Collection System Permit Igo. WQCS00002 and G.S. 143-215.1(a)(1). The violation(s)
that occurred are summarized in Attachment A to this letter.
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that City of Raleigh violated the terms,conditions or
requirements of Collection System Permit No. WQCS00002 and G.S. 143-215.1(a)(1) in the manner and extent shown in
Attachment A. In accordance with the maximums established by G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2),a civil penalty may be assessed
against any person who violates the terms, conditions or requirements of a permit required by G.S. 143-215.1(a).
D_E Q
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
1628 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,NC 27699-1628
919-791-4200
j

Based upon the above findings of fact and conclusions of law, and in accordance with authority provided by the
Secretary of the Department of Environmental Quality and the Director of the Division of Water Resources,I, Danny
Smith, Regional Supervisor,Raleigh Regional Office hereby make the following civil penalty assessment against City of
Raleigh:
$500.00 For 1 of the 9 violations of Collection System Permit No. WQCS00002 and G.S. 143-215.1(a)(1)for
Sanitary Sewer Overflow(s)resulting in a discharge without a valid permit.
$500.00 TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY
$32.36 Enforcement Costs
$532.36 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken into account the Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B-282.1(b),which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State,to the public health, or to private property
resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over which the Environmental
Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
Within thirty(30) days of receipt of this notice,you must do one of the following:
(1) Submit payment of the penalty, OR
(2) Submit a written request for remission, OR
(3) Submit a written request for an administrative hearing
Option 1: Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environmental Quality(do not include waiver
form). Payment of the penalty will not foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Gwyn McCullough
PERCS Unit
Division of Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617

Option 2: Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed justification for such
• request:
Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five factors listed below as they may
relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the civil penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper
procedure for contesting whether the violation(s)occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements contained in
the civil penalty assessment document. Because a remission request forecloses the option of an administrative hearing,
such a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an administrative hearing and a stipulation and
agreement that no factual or legal issues are in dispute. Please prepare a detailed statement that establishes why you
believe the civil penalty should be remitted,and submit it to the Division of Water Resources at the address listed below.
In determining whether a remission request will be approved,the following factors shall be considered:
(1) whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in NCGS 143B-282.1(b)was wrongfully
applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(2) whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the violation;
(3) whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(4) whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations; or
(5) whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary remedial actions.
Please note that all evidence presented in support of your request for remission must be submitted in writing. The
Director of the Division of Water Resources will review your evidence and inform you of his decision in the matter of
your remission request. The response will provide details regarding the case status, directions for payment,and
provision for further appeal of the penalty to the Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions(Committee). Please be advised that the Committee cannot consider information that was not part of the
original remission request considered by the Director. Therefore, it is very important that you prepare a complete and
thorough statement in support of your request for remission.
In order to request remission, you must complete and submit the enclosed"Request for Remission of Civil Penalties,
Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing, and Stipulation of Facts"form within thirty(30)days of receipt of this
notice. The Division of Water Resources also requests that you complete and submit the enclosed"Justification for
Remission Request."
Both forms should be submitted to the following address:
Gwyn McCullough
PERCS Unit
Division of Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617
AND
Danny Smith,Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Raleigh Regional Office
Division of Water Resources,NCDEQ
1628 Mail Service Center,Raleigh
Raleigh,NC 27699-1628

,Option 3: File a petition for an administrative hearing with the Office of Administrative Hearings:
If you wish to contest any statement in the attached assessment document you must file a petition for an administrative
hearing. You may obtain the petition form from the Office of Administrative Hearings. You must file the petition with
the Office of Administrative Hearings within thirty(30)days of receipt of this notice. A petition is considered filed
when it is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of Administrative
Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., except for official state
holidays. The petition may be filed by facsimile(fax)or electronic mail by an attached file(with restrictions) -provided
the signed original, one(1)copy and a filing fee(if a filing fee is required by NCGS §150B-23.2) is received in the
Office of Administrative Hearings within seven(7)business days following the faxed or electronic transmission. You
should contact the Office of Administrative Hearings with all questions regarding the filing fee and/or the details of the
filing process.
The mailing address and telephone and fax numbers for the Office of Administrative Hearings are as follows:
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699 6714
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
One(1)copy of the petition must also be served on DEQ as follows:
Mr. William F. Lane, General Counsel
Department of Environmental Quality
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1601
Please indicate the case number(as found on page one of this letter)on the petition.
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty(30)days of receipt of this letter, as evidenced by an internal
date/time received stamp (not a postmark), will result in this matter being referred to the Attorney General's Office for
collection of the penalty through a civil action. Please be advised that additional penalties may be assessed for violations
that occur after the review period of this assessment.
If you have any questions,please contact Mitchell Hayes with the Division of Water Resources staff of the Raleigh
Regional Office at(919) 791-4200 or via email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Danny Smith, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Raleigh Regional Office
Division of Water Resources,NCDEQ
ATTACHMENTS
Cc: WQS Raleigh Regional Office-Enforcement File
PERCS Compliance/Enforcement Unit-Enforcement File
Central Files

• JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REQUEST
_ Wake
Number: DV-2018-0068 County: Wa e
Assessed Party: City of Raleigh
Permit No.: WQCS00002 Amount Assessed: $532.36
Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the "Request For Remission,
Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing, and Stipulation of Facts"form to request remission of this civil penalty.
You should attach any documents that you believe support your request and are necessary for the Director to consider in
evaluating your request for remission. Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five
factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the civil penalty assessed. Requesting
remission is not the proper procedure for contesting whether the violation(s)occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual
statements contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 143B-282.1(c),remission of a civil
penalty may be granted only when one or more of the following five factors apply. Please check each factor that you
believe applies to your case and provide a detailed explanation, including copies of supporting documents,as to why the
factor applies (attach additional pages as needed).
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in N.C.G.S. 143B-282.1(b)were wrongfully applied to the
detriment of the petitioner(the assessment factors are listed in the civil penalty assessment document);
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the violation(i.e., explain the
steps that you took to correct the violation and prevent future occurrences);
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident(i.e., explain why the violation was unavoidable or
something you could not prevent or prepare for);
•
(d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary remedial actions (i.e., explain
how payment of the civil penalty will prevent you from performing the activities necessary to achieve
compliance).
EXPLANATION:

•
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
COUNTY OF WAKE
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
City of Raleigh )
Raleigh Collection System )
PERMIT NO. WQCS00002 ) CASE NO. DV-2018-0068
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling$532.36 for violation(s)as set forth in the assessment document of the Division
of Water Resources dated October 29, 2018,the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil penalty, does hereby
waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above-stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the
assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in support of remission of this civil
penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of Water Resources within thirty(30)days of receipt of the notice
of assessment. No new evidence in support of a remission request will be allowed after(30)days from the receipt of the
notice of assessment.
This the day of ,20
SIGNATURE
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE

ATTACHMENT A
City of Raleigh
CASE NUMBER: DV-2018-0068
PERMIT NO: WQCS00002 REGION: Raleigh
FACILITY: Raleigh Collection System COUNTY: Wake
Other Violations
INCIDENT VIOLATION TOTAL VOLUME PENALTY
NUMBER DATE VIOLATION TYPE VIOLATION DESCRIPTION (GALLONS) AMOUNT
201800521 4/8/2018 CSO/SSO(Sewer Overflow) Discharge without valid permit 10,500 $0.00
201800640 4/29/2018 CSO/SSO(Sewer Overflow) Discharge without valid permit 2,400 $0.00
201800669 5/2/2018 CSO/SSO(Sewer Overflow) Discharge without valid permit 8,000 $0.00
201800676 5/4/2018 CSO/SSO(Sewer Overflow) Discharge without valid permit 10,996 $0.00
201800765 5/21/2018 CSO/SSO(Sewer Overflow) Discharge without valid permit 6,000 $0.00
201800862 5/31/2018 CSO/SSO(Sewer Overflow) Discharge without valid permit 2,400 $0.00
201800864 5/31/2018 CSO/SSO(Sewer Overflow) Discharge without valid permit 360,000 $0.00
201800888 6/8/2018 CSO/SSO(Sewer Overflow) Discharge without valid permit 20,000 $500.00
201800907 6/13/2018 CSO/SSO(Sewer Overflow) Discharge without valid permit 3,000 $0.00
Total Vol
Total Surface
Incident Start Duration Vol Water
Number Date (Mins) Location Cause (Gals) (Gals) DWR Action
201800497 4/2/2018 150 Cleanout at 1001 N Debris in line 750 750 No Action
Bend Drive
201800521 4/8/2018 210 941 Palace Garden Way Debris in line 10,500 10,500 Notice of Violation
201800640 4/29/2018 240 2906 McNeil Street Grease 2,400 2,400 Notice of Violation
201800669 5/2/2018 2520 8121 Old Nowell Rd. Pipe failure 8,000 2,500 Notice of Violation
201800676 5/4/2018 3960 643 Virginia Water Dr. Debris in line 10,996 100 Notice of Violation
201800765 5/21/2018 240 6201 Shanda Blvd. Debris in line 6,000 0 Notice of Violation
201800862 5/31/2018 5760 4829 Rembert Dr. Pipe failure 2,400 2,400 Notice of Violation
201800864 5/31/2018 5760 3311 Grove Crabtree Pipe failure 360,000 360,000 Notice of Violation
Crescent Notice of Intent
to Enforce
201800888 6/8/2018 1340 Greenway Trail at Other 20,000 10,000 Notice of Violation
Hodges St. Notice of Intent

•
' • Total Vol
Total Surface
Incident Start Duration Vol Water
Number Date (Mins) Location Cause (Gals) (Gals) DWR Action
201800907 6/13/2018 180 9517 Strickland Rd. Grease 3,000 1,000 Notice of Violation

wi%VI
40111401,
I
!::,'Z'&7 1 1 . - _
r .
ROY COOPER NORTH CAROLINA
Envi r,tmen;ai Quality
GOVernOr
MICHAEL S_REGAN
secrete}
LINDA CULPEPPER
Interim Director:
October 29, 2018
Michael E Johnson RECEIWD/DENFt/DWR
The Chemours Company Fc LLC NOV
22828 NC Highway 87 West 1 3 2018
Fayetteville, NC 28306-7332 Pater Resources
rmiffing Section
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection Report
Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works
NPDES WW Permit No. NC0003573
Bladen County
Dear Permittee:
The North Carolina Division of Water Resources conducted an inspection of the Chemours
Company-Fayetteville Works on 8/31/2018. This inspection was conducted to verify that the facility is
operating in compliance with the conditions and limitations specified in NPDES WW Permit No.
NC0003573. The findings and comments noted during this inspection are provided in the enclosed copy
of the inspection report entitled "Compliance Inspection Report".
There were no significant issues or findings noted during the inspection and therefore, a response to this
inspection report is not required.
Comments
•The Division of Water Resources Inspection report has been delayed because of issues related to
Hurricane Florence.
•Facility was clean and neat at the time of the inspection.
•Maintenance records are kept on an electronic work order system. The ORC log was up to date at the
time of the inspection.
u. :, ci.9 )
....,
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
225 Green Street,Suite 714,Fayetteville,NC 28301-5043
910-433-3300

•The April 2018 eDMR was reviewed for transcription errors. During this review, data for BOD and TSS for
outfall 001 were compared to results from the facility's contract laboratory, TBL Labs in Lumberton, NC.
For outfall 002, pH and Temperature data were compared to the laboratory data provided by the onsite
laboratory. No transcriptions errors for these parameters were found at the time of the inspection.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Mark Brantley with the Water
Quality Regional Operations Section in the Fayetteville Regional Office at 910-433-3300 or via email at
[e-mail].
Sincerely,
/ ^s
Mark Brantley, Assistant Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Fayetteville Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
ATTACHMENTS
Cc: WQS Fayetteville Regional Office - Enforcement File
NPDES Compliance/Enforcement Unit - Enforcement File
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
225 Green Street,Suite 714,Fayetteville,NC 28301-5043
910-433-3300

United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved.
E PA Washington,D.C.20460 . OMB No.2040-0057 -- -' ••
Water-Compliance Inspection Report - Approval eXpires8'-31-98
Section A:National Data System Coding(i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 IN I 2 LI 3 I NC0003573 111 121 18/08/31 117 18 I�.I 19 Ls_j 20'
21111111 111111 1 1 111 111 1111 1 1 11111 11111111 [ 1 1 1 f6
Inspection Work Days Facility Self-Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA — Reserved
671 1 70 LJ[ i 711 1 72 ,LJ� 731 1 174 751 80
1 1 1 1 1 1 1Section B:Facility Data 1
Name and Location of Facility Inspected(For Industrial Users discharging to POTW,also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number) 09:15AM 16/08/31 12/03/01
Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works
Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date
22828 NC Highway 87 West
12:00PM 18/08/31 16/10/31
Fayetteville NC 283067332
Name(s)of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data
///
Jamie Ray Lewis/ORC/910-678-1219/
Name,Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Michael E Johnson,22828 NC Highway 87 West Fayetteville NC
No
283067332//910-678-1155/
Section C:Areas Evaluated During Inspection(Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit • Flow Measurement • Operations&Maintenance • Records/Reports
▪ Self-Monitoring Program • Sludge Handling Disposal II Facility Site Review II Effluent/Receiving Waters
• Laboratory
Section D:Summary of Finding/Comments(Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s)and Signature(s)of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Mark Brantley FRO WQ//910-433-3300 Ext.727/
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
EPA Form 3560-3(Rev 9-94)Previous editions are obsolete.
Page# 1

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type (Cont.) 1
31 NC0003573 111 121 18/08/31 117 18 Lcj
Section D:Summary of Finding/Comments(Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Comments
The Division of Water Resources Inspection report has been delayed because of issues related to
Hurricane Florence.
Facility was clean and neat at the time of the inspection.
Maintenance records are kept on an electronic work order system. The ORC log was up to date at the
time of the inspection.
The April 2018 eDMR was reviewed for transcription errors. During this review, data for BOD and TSS
for outfall 001 were compared to results from the facility's contract laboratory, TBL Labs in Lumberton,
NC. For outfall 002, pH and Temperature data were compared to the laboratory data provided by the
onsite laboratory. No transcriptions errors for these parameters were found at the time of the
inspection.
Page# 2

Permit: NC0003573 Owner-Facility: Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works
• - Inspection Date: 08/31/2018 • Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation • ._
- --
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? • 000
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable 11000
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment:
Permit Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new U 000
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit? • 000
#Are there any special conditions for the permit? 00 • O
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? • 000
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? • 0 ❑ ❑
Comment:
Record Keeping Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? • 000
Is all required information readily available, complete and current? • 000
Are all records maintained for 3 years(lab. reg. required 5 years)? • 000
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? U ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the chain-of-custody complete? U ❑ 0 0
Dates,times and location of sampling U
Name of individual performing the sampling U
Results of analysis and calibration •
Dates of analysis U
Name of person performing analyses U
Transported COCs U
Are DMRs complete:do they include all permit parameters? M ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? 00 • O
(If the facility is=or>5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator 00 • O
on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current? U ❑ ❑ 0
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? • ❑ 0 ❑
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? U 0 0 0
Page# 3

Permit: NC0003573 Owner-Facility: Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works
Inspection Date: 08/31/2018 • Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Record Keeping Yes No NA NE
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? 001110
Comment:
Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? 111000
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? • 000
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? ❑ ❑ U ❑
Comment:
Flow Measurement-Effluent Yes No NA NE
#Is flow meter used for reporting? • 000
Is flow meter calibrated annually? • 000
Is the flow meter operational? U ❑ ❑ ❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? 00 • O
Comment:
Solids Handling Equipment Yes No NA NE
Is the equipment operational? • 000
Is the chemical feed equipment operational? U ❑ ❑ ❑
Is storage adequate? M ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of high level of solids in filtrate from filter presses or vacuum filters? DOOM
Is the site free of sludge buildup on belts and/or rollers of filter press? 000 •
Is the site free of excessive moisture in belt filter press sludge cake? • ❑ ❑ ❑
The facility has an approved sludge management plan? 0 ❑ U ❑
Comment: Sludge is disposed of at the Sampson County Landfill.
Chemical Feed Yes No NA NE
Is containment adequate? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is storage adequate? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Are backup pumps available? • 000
Is the site free of excessive leaking? U ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Page# 4

i
0 N N N N N N N N D N N M 0 4tD D D D c F) Fo M 0 ( v, D D D N c7
3 7- 7- 7• 7- 7- 0 0- s o 0- 0- CD o m of not m m m °' (A m m m c 'a
m m m m m m o o o 3 = 3 o n m w m m 3
0. a
3 v, oco < m a N v_, v_, o v, c) 0 3 voi a w -o -o v , m - co3o- 0 0 v v c 0
7 a m C < M N W cD N m N 0. 7 Q O C C co co co 7 (D D C7 C C .O-r 3 .�i� O
3 3 �' cD =. =i d .. N (D 7 .p 'p 5, r. 7 .. 7 (D 7 "D Ol 7 N
. . N 7 CD O (D CD N CD (D CND 7 N N 3 N CD 0 0_ (D , N N cD * = L 3
d a m ^' o N o o .73 o m n < a N -oo v o m v < 3 v v = co = !?
o g <_ 0 0 o W N o m m m
n co n N Q �. n O �; N N Q X V! v N (D 0-
7 0 = w o
< (D O N N 7 Q N W W N Q CT J 0 N72, . N N Cr J J X N C cWi�
W X 0. N <' (D W O0 <Z N 01 (D CO N 3 N (D C0D O CD m w
n J (D .J O (D Q J — Q 'J N 7
ID C co 5 N Q
o N (D O N
ii
N < W.J OO NO_ (O .9 oNO cD a OO CD —
Q .J o o7 C J O QN (Jo c Op O N N m N
X CO'/ J J 7 0, O 9 .J C
3 J CD D) Sj C
N 7
cis C N N
(D (D 'J 7 7> N
N N
O
O CD
m
N C p
a °' 3
n (D a
a
-_ J r 0 4'
im J m
N ,z
O D-
3 3
m C
7N
n
CD n
m 0
< 3
m v
c m
m 7
m
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ M '° _
-o ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ C 1=1001:101=10 G o
um Z
ID ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ > ■ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ •z ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Z z z N
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ m 1:1001=10000 m ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ m

Permit: NC0003573 Owner-Facility: Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works
Inspection Date: 08/31/2018 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE
Mode of operation Ext.Air
Type of aeration system Diffused
Is the basin free of dead spots? MOOD
Are surface aerators and mixers operational? U ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the diffusers operational? • 1101:1
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process? • 01=10
Does the foam cover less than 25%of the basin's surface? MOOD
Is the DO level acceptable? 1111:11:10
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/I) U ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Laboratory Yes No NA NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory? • 1:101=1
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters)performed by a certified lab? U ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is the facility using a contract lab? 11000
#Is proper temperature set for sample storage(kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees 111000
Celsius)?
Incubator(Fecal Coliform)set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/-0.2 degrees? ❑ ❑ U ❑
Incubator(BOD)set to 20.0 degrees Celsius+/-1.0 degrees? 001111:1
Comment:
Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional? U ❑ ❑ ❑
Is sample collected below all treatment units? 11000
Is proper volume collected? • 1:100
Is the tubing clean? 1111000
#Is proper temperature set for sample storage(kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees U ❑ ❑ ❑
Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit(frequency,sampling type • 1:100
representative)?
Comment:
Upstream 1 Downstream Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit(frequency, sampling type, and 00110
sampling location)?
Page# 6

Permit: NC
0003573 Owner-Facility: Chemours Company-Fayetteville Works
Inspection Date: 08/31/2018 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation _.
Upstream/ Downstream Sampling Yes No NA NE
Comment: Facility is a member of the Middle Cape Fear River Basin Association.
Page# 7

Regional Inspectors' Checklist for Field Parameters
Facility Name: Chemours VVWTP Regional Plant Inspector: Mark Brantley
NPDES #: NC0003573 Regional Inspector Contact#: 910-433-3326
Field Lab Certification #: Region: FRO
Lab Contact: Jamie Lewis Date: October 29, 2018
I. Check the parameter(s) performed at this site for reporting purposes.
❑ Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) ® Temperature (TEMP) ❑ Specific Conductivity (SC)
® pH ® Dissolved Oxygen (DO) ❑ Settleable Residue (SETT)
II. General Laboratory (note any exceptions in section XI)
Are instruments, meters, probes, photometric cells, etc. maintained in good condition? ® Yes ❑ No
Are standards, reagents and consumables used within manufacturer expiration dates? ® Yes ❑ No
[TRC gel standard is exempt.]
Date of sam•le collection* _Time of sample collection*
Sam•le collector's initials or si•nature
Date of sam.le anal sis*
Time of sample anal sis'`
Anal st initials or si•nature
Sample location
*Date and time of sample collection and analysis may be the same for in situ or on-site measurements.
Total Residual Chlorine meter make and model:
Is a check standard analyzed each day of use? (Circle one: gel or liquid standard) Yes No
What is the assigned/observed value of the daily check standard?
Is a 5-point calibration verification performed? Note date of last verification: Yes No
Alternatively, does the lab construct a linear regression, using 5 standards, to calculate Yes No
results? Note date of last calibration curve constructed:
True values: ❑ pg/L ❑ mg/L
Obtained values: ❑ pg/L ❑ mg/L
What program are samples analyzed on?
Are results reported in proper units? Check one: ❑ pg/L ❑ mg/L Yes No
Are results reported between the facility's permit limit and the compliance limit of 50 pg/L? Yes No
If value is less than the low standard, report as "<x", where x=low standard conc.
Are sam•les anal zed within 15 minutes of collection? Yes No
pH meter make and model: Hack 440d
Is the pH meter calibrated with at least 2 buffers per mfg's instructions each day of use? ® Yes ❑ No
Note buffers used: 4,7,10
Is the pH meter calibration checked with an additional buffer each day of use? Note check ® Yes ❑ No
buffer used:7, the same buffer as the one used for calibration.
Does the check buffer read within ±0.1 S.U. of the known value? ® Yes ❑ No
Are the following items documented:
Meter calibration? ® Yes ❑ No
Check buffer reading? ® Yes ❑ No
Are samples analyzed within 15 minutes of collection? ®Yes ❑ No
Are sample results reported to 0.1 pH units? ® Yes ❑ No

What instrument(s) is used to measure temperature? Check all that apply: ❑ pH meter
❑ DO meter ❑ Conductivity meter ❑ Digital thermometer ® Glass thermometer
Is the instrument/thermometer calibration checked at least annually against a NIST ® Yes El No
traceable or NIST certified thermometer?
Are temperature corrections (even if zero) posted on the instrument/thermometer? ® Yes ❑ No
Are samples measured in situ or on-site? [REQUIRED -there is no holding time for ® Yes ❑ No
temperature]
Are sam•le results resorted in de•rees C? ® Yes ❑ No
DO meter make and model:
Is the air calibration of the DO meter performed each day of use? Yes No
Are the following items documented:
Meter calibration? Yes No
Are samples analyzed within 15 minutes of collection? Yes No
Are results resorted in m•/L? Yes No
Conductivity meter make and model:
Is the meter calibrated daily according to the manufacturer's instructions? Note standard Yes No
used (this is generally a one-point calibration):
Is a daily check standard analyzed? Note value: Yes No
Are the following items documented:
Meter calibration? Yes No
Are samples analyzed within 28 days of collection? Yes No
Are results resorted in mhos/cm some meters dis•Ia esuivalent S/cm units ? Yes No
Does the laboratory have an Imhoff Cone in good condition? Yes No
Is the sample settled for 1 hour? Yes No
Is the sample agitated after 45 minutes? Yes No
Are the following items documented:
Volume of sample analyzed? Note volume analyzed: Yes No
Date and time of sample analysis (settling start time)? Yes No
Time of agitation after 45 minutes of settling? Yes No
Sample analysis completion (settling end time)? Yes No
Are samples analyzed within 48 hours of collection? Yes No
Are results resorted in ml/L? Yes No
=.t
•erformed? if so, list months reviewed: April 2018
int® cw-!4p..J9f.it o-ra ,Certification pro r,m recommended? f ❑ Yes El, No:=..
Xl. Additional comments:
Please submit a copy of this completed form to the Laboratory Certification program at:
DWQ Lab Certification, Chemistry Lab, Courier# 52-01-01
Electronic copies may be emailed to linda.chavisncdenr.ciov.
Revision 04/20/2012