20181494 Ver 1_401 Application_20181030

1
ENVIRONMENTAL
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
OCTOBER 24, 2018
TO: NCDEQ FROM:
DWR, 401 & Permitting Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
SUBJECT:
ENCLOSURES:
M
20181494
C2 Environmental, Inc.
c/o Jennifer B. Johnson
739 Thimble Shoals Blvd
Suite 1011-F
Newport News, VA 23606
Phone: [phone]
Pre -Construction Notification for Trowbridge — Weyerhaeuser Transmission
Lines Project in Martin & Washington Counties
COPIES DESCRIPTION
4 PCN
1 Check for permit application fee in the amount of $240.00
Enclosed, please find four copies of the PCN and permit fee for the Dominion Energy North
Carolina project, Trowbridge — Weyerhaeuser Transmission Lines. The enclosures are being
provided for Section 401 Water Quality Certification permit verification. A copy has been sent to
Mr. Billy Sandridge at the US Army Corps of Engineers under separate cover. Please contact me
at 757-636-5047 or jjohnsongc2environmental.com if you have any questions or require any
additional information.
Regards,
)4 -3 -J, ----
Jennifer B. Johnson
Senior Project Manager
D
FF -'('T 3 0 2018
f?1 Irl_..-.
C2 ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. 1 739 THIMBLE SHOALS BLVD, SUITE 1011-F, NEWPORT NEWS VA 23606 1 757-223-0071

*I\ "I
��IUA '��
ENVIRONMENTAL
October 24, 2018
NC Department of Environmental Quality
DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Subject: Trowbridge — Weyerhaeuser Transmission Lines Section 401 Water Quality
Certification Verification
Martin and Washington Counties, North Carolina
Applicant: Virginia Electric and Power Company (d/b/a Dominion Energy North
Carolina)
On behalf of Dominion Energy North Carolina (Dominion), C2 Environmental, Inc. (C2 Env) is pleased
to submit the enclosed Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) for the Trowbridge — Weyerhaeuser
Transmission Lines project (Project) for agency review and permit verification. Dominion is proposing to
partially rebuild Lines 168 and 167 between the Trowbridge Substation located in the Town of Plymouth,
Washington County, and the Weyerhaeuser Substation located in Martin County. The Project is located in
the Lower Roanoke River drainage basin, Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 030101070901, Welch Creek
and drains to waters classified as C; SW according to the NC Department of Environmental Quality
(NCDEQ). The Project is expected to result in permanent impacts to 255 square feet of palustrine
emergent (PEM) wetland for fill associated with the new pipe pile foundations. The project appears to
meet the terms and conditions of Nationwide Permit (NWP) 3 or 12; a copy of this PCN has been
submitted to the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) under separate cover for verification. The project
appears to meet the terms and conditions of the corresponding Section 401 Water Quality Certifications,
4132 (NWP3) and/or 4433 (NWP12), and Dominion is respectfully requesting verification for their
records that no further action is required. Additional project details are provided below and a PCN
(Attachment A), along with other supporting documentation and fee check, is enclosed for agency review.
Project Description
Dominion is proposing to partially rebuild approximately one mile of their existing overhead transmission
lines, Lines 168 and 167, which parallel one another within the same right-of-way (ROW) between the
Trowbridge and Weyerhaeuser Substations. The scope of work includes replacing the existing wood 2 -
pole and 3 -pole structures on each line with new steel structures of similar height (within 2-5 feet) and
appearance. The new structures, 26 in total, will feature a 36 -inch pipe pile foundation (Foundation
Detail, Attachment B). For those structures located in wetlands, the new foundations will result in
permanent impacts to approximately 255 square feet of PEM wetlands (classified as Bottomland
Hardwood Forest) (Jurisdictional Impacts Map, Attachment B).
C2 ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. 1 739 THIMBLE SHOALS BLVD, SUITE 101 1F NEWPORT NEWS, VA 23606 1 757-223-0071

DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
October 24, 2018
Page 2 of 4
The work will also include replacement of the overhead fiber wire on each transmission line, but no work
to the overhead 3-phase electrical conductor wire is proposed. Temporary guard structures consisting of
driven piles will be placed on either side of Welch Creek to help support the overhead conductor wire
during construction but no work within Welch Creek is proposed. The new line will maintain or exceed
the existing minimum vertical clearance above Welch Creek.
Construction access to the ROW will be provided via existing roads wherever possible. Where access is
needed, and no existing roads are present, access will use timber or composite mats to temporarily cross
jurisdictional features. No stream crossings are proposed, including Welch Creek. The existing
transmission line ROW will continue to be maintained on a regular cycle to control the growth of woody
species in order to prevent interference with the existing and rebuilt electric facilities. No new ROW is
required. Tree clearing for the project is limited to select trees and limbs at pinch points along the
construction access routes, as noted on the Jurisdictional Impacts Map.
Wetland Delineation
The limits of wetlands and waters of the U.S. (WOUS) within the project area were delineated using the
Routine Determination Method as outlined in the 1987 the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)1987
Wetland Delineation Manual and the methods described in the 2010 Regional Supplement: Atlantic &
Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2.0). Jurisdictional features were flagged in the field at the time of
delineation. Concurrent with this NWP verification request, Dominion is requesting that the Corps
provide a preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) of this delineation. A total of 12.36 acres of
PEM wetland, 5.39 of palustrine scrub -shrub wetland, 3.12 acres of palustrine forested wetland, and 272
linear feet of stream channel were identified within the project area. The limits of features identified in the
delineation are illustrated on the enclosed Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map (Attachment B) and a
complete request for PJD has been submitted to the Corps directly (Attachment C).
Threatened & Endangered Species
The US Fish and Wildlife Service Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaQ system and the
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) data explorer were searched to identify potential listed
and other protected species in the vicinity of the project. The results of the searches and a Species
Conclusion Table are provided in Attachment D. The IPaC search identified the northern long eared bat
(Myotis septentrionalis), Red Wolf (Canis rufus), Red Knot (Calidris canutus rufa), red -cockaded
Woodpecker (Picoides borealis), and American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) as potentially being
present within the vicinity of the project. No critical habitat was identified. These species were also
identified by the NHP data, as well as the Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus), shortnose
sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum), and bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus). Based on the project's
scope of work, no impacts to these species are expected.
Welch Creek is an inland water identified by the Department of Marine Fisheries as Anadromous Fish
Spawning Area. It is also identified as Essential Fish Habitat for Snapper/Grouper by the National
C2 ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. 1739 THIMBLE SHOALS BLVD, SUITE 1011F NEWPORT NEWS, VA 23606 1 757-223-0071

DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
October 24, 2018
Page 3 of 4
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. No work within Welch Creek is proposed and erosion and
sediment controls will be used as appropriate during construction, therefore, no impacts to Welch Creek
or protected aquatic species are anticipated from the project.
Cultural & Historic Resources Information
The North Carolina Historic Preservation Office Web GIS Service was used to identify historic resources
that could potentially be impacted by the project. No resources listed or eligible for listing on the National
Register of Historic Places were identified within 0.5 miles of the project (Attachment E). Two resources
on the North Carolina Study List were identified within 0.5 miles, the National Handle Company Plant
(WH0011) and the Plymouth County Club Estates Historic District (WH0045). No impacts to any
cultural or historic resources are anticipated from the project since the scope of work consists of partially
rebuilding existing facilities with like kind.
100 -Year Floodplain
The proposed work is located within the 100 -year floodplain (Zone AE) according to Federal Emergency
Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map 320676700K, Panel 6767. The project is not proposing
to alter base flood elevations and as such, no impacts to the 100 -year floodplain are expected.
Conclusion & Other Approvals
Since total fill within jurisdictional areas is below 0.10 acres, no compensatory mitigation is proposed at
this time. The project appears to qualify under the Corps' Nationwide Permit program and a copy of this
PCN has been submitted to the Corps under separate cover for verification. Verification from the
Department of Coastal Management has been received documenting that the proposed activity is exempt
from Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) regulations. Welch Creek is regulated under CAMA as an
inland water, plus a 30 -foot buffer; however, no fill is proposed within these features. A copy of this
verification can be provided upon request. It is expected that erosion and sediment control plans will be
required for the project and approved by NCDEQ; however, as the increase in incidental built upon area is
negligible (only associated with the replacement structures), a stormwater management plan is not
expected to be required.
C2 ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. I 739 THIMBLE SHOALS BLVD, SUITE 101 1F NEWPORT NEWS, VA 23606 1 757-223-0071

DWP, 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
October 24, 2018
Page 4 of 4
Thank you for your prompt review of this information. If you have any questions or require any additional
information, please feel free to contact me at your earliest convenience.
Regards,
Jennifer B. Johnson
Senior Project Manager
757-636-5047
jjohnson e,c2environmental.com
CC. Mr. C.J. Lindemann, Dominion Energy
Mr. Billy Standridge, US Army Corps of Engineers
Attachment A: Pre -Construction Notification
Attachment B: Project Graphics
Attachment C: Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
Attachment D: Threatened & Endangered Species Information
Attachment E: Cultural & Historic Resources Information
C2 ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. 1 739 THIMBLE SHOALS BLVD, SUITE 101 IF NEWPORT NEWS, VA 23606 1 757-223-0071

ATTACHMENT A
Pre -Construction Notification
Trowbridge — Weyerhaeuser Transmission Lines
Applicant: Dominion Energy North Carolina
Agent: C2 Environmental, Inc.

oo� WA L_R:9
E
P -c
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑X Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑X Yes ❑ No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
N Yes NX No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
0 Yes ❑ No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Trowbridge -Weyerhaeuser Transmission Lines
2b.
County:
Martin and Washington
2c.
Nearest municipality /town:
Plymouth
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
N/A
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
N/A
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
N/A
3d.
Street address:
N/A
3e.
City, state, zip:
N/A
3f.
Telephone no.:
N/A
3g. Fax no.:
N/A
3h. Email address:
N/A
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
Carl J Lindemann, Jr
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
Virginia Electric and Power Company (dba Dominion Energy North Carolina)
4d. Street address:
10900 Nuckols Road, 4th floor
4e. City, state, zip:
Henrico County, VA 23060
4f. Telephone no.:
804-771-6408
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Jennifer B Johnson
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
C2 Environmental, Inc.
5c. Street address:
739 Thimble Shoals Blvd, Suite 1011 F
5d. City, state, zip:
Newport News, VA 23606
5e. Telephone no.:
757-636-5047
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
multiple
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Trowbridge Sub: 35.851084,-76.768731 Weyerhaeuser Sub: 35.862414,-76.769034
1 c. Property size:
36.7 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Welch Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C, SW
2c. River basin:
Roanoke River
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project area consists of an existing, maintained transmission line right-of-way occupied by two overhead transmission lines, two existing
substations, and existing access roads. The immediate area surrounding the project is generally undeveloped, forest/swamp, and is located adjacent
to the Roanoke River and Domtar Paper Company, LLC pulp mill facility.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 20.9
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 272
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Replace aging facilities to ensure service reliability.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the tyre of equipment to be used:
The project includes replacing he existing wood 2 -pole an 3 -pole s tyre
on each line with new steel structures of similar height and appearance.
The new structures, 26 in total, will feature a 36 -inch pipe pile foundations. The existing overhead fiber wire is to be replaced but not work to the existing
electrical conductor wire is proposed. Timber mats will be used to cross jurisdictional features as necessary.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
roject includin all rior hases in the ast?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
Comments: Concurrent with requested NWP verification
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company: VHB
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Request for preliminary jurisdictional determination is enclosed for review concurrently with this Nationwide Permit verification request.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑ Streams —tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
See attached Supplemental Wetland Impacts Table. Total wetland impacts are approximately 255 square feet.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 -
Choose one
-
S2 -
Choose one
-
S3 -
Choose one
-
_
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
None proposed.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivii ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
O1 -
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: one proposed.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled Excavated Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments: N/A
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments: N/A
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Structures were replaced with like -kind and feature a single foundation per pole, rather than a large, connected foundation. Due to the location of the
existing transmission line right-of-way within the large wetland track, complete avoidance was not possible.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction access was designed to use existing access where possible and new temporary access will feature timber mats rather than gravel to
avoid temporary or permanent impacts.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: N/A
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments: N/A
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
N/A
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
N/A
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
<12
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
The increase in incidental built upon area is negligible, and is associated with the replacement pole structures.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
N/A
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
N/A
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Martin & Washington
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
OCoastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
E]ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
El Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
El Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
El Yes ❑X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
El Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The facility be located its location be the
A commercial portable toilet will be maintained during construction. will outside of wetlands and will noted on
Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. The facility will be maintained/ emptied regularly and taken off-site (non -discharge) at the completion of the
project.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑X Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑x Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS IPaC and NHP Data Explorer
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑X Yes ❑ No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA EFH Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCSHPO Web GIS Service
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑X Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The scope of work does not propose to alter the base flood elevations of the area.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FRIS
Jennifer B. Johnson
Applicant/Agent's Printed Namepplic
/ ens ignature
Date
rt's signatur is alid only if an authorization
letter from the/applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

PCN Section C.2a. Supplemental Impacts Table
Existing
New
Longitude
Latitude
Structure
Permanet or
Type of
Type of
Impact Area
Structure
Structure
Type of Wetland
Forested?
(DD)
(DD)
Type
Temporary
Impact
Jurisdiction
(square feet)
Number
Number
Bottomland Hardwood
167/1
167/1
-76.76903523
35.85231811
2 -Pole
Permanent
Fill
No
Corps
14.1
Forest
Bottomland Hardwood
167/2
167/2
-76.76945524
35.85337789
3 -Pole
Permanent
Fill
No
Corps
21.2
Forest
Bottomland Hardwood
167/3
167/3
-76.76882478
35.85422681
2 -Pole
Permanent
Fill
No
Corps
14.1
Forest
Bottomland Hardwood
167/4
167/4
-76.76815772
35.85512499
2 -Pole
Permanent
Fill
No
Corps
14.1
Forest
Bottomland Hardwood
167/5
167/5
-76.76738503
35.85616538
3 -Pole
Permanent
Fill
No
Corps
21.2
Forest
Bottomland Hardwood
167/6
167/6
-76.76782367
35.85757157
2 -Pole
Permanent
Fill
No
Corps
14.1
Forest
Bottomland Hardwood
167/8
167/8
-76.7687212
35.86044865
2 -Pole
Permanent
Fill
No
Corps
14.1
Forest
Bottomland Hardwood
167/9
167/9
-76.76908594
35.86161779
3 -Pole
Permanent
Fill
No
Corps
21.2
Forest
Bottomland Hardwood
168/3
168/2
-76.76971061
35.85340332
3 -Pole
Permanent
Fill
No
Corps
21.2
Forest
Bottomland Hardwood
168/4
168/3
-76.76904843
35.8542921
2 -Pole
Permanent
Fill
No
Corps
14.1
Forest
Bottomland Hardwood
168/5
168/4
-76.76836743
35.85520613
2 -Pole
Permanent
Fill
No
Corps
14.1
Forest
Bottomland Hardwood
168/6
168/5
-76.76763658
35.85618704
3 -Pole
Permanent
Fill
No
Corps
21.2
Forest
Bottomland Hardwood
168/7
168/6
-76.76804226
35.85748672
2 -Pole
Permanent
Fill
No
Corps
14.1
Forest
168/9
168/8
-76.76895156
35.86039968
2 -Pole
Permanent
Fill
Bottomland Hardwood
No
Corps
14.1
Forest
168/10
168/9
-76.76932986
35.86161397
3 -Pole
Permanent
Fill
Bottomland Hardwood
No
Corps
21.2
Forest
Total:
255
Trowbridge - Weyerhaeuser Transatission Lines
Applicant: Dominion Energy North Carolina
Agent: C2 Environmental, Inc.

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO.
PLAN NO.
PARCEL ID: multiple
Transmission line right-of-way extending approximately 1 mile north from
STREET ADDRESS:
Trowbridge Subsstation to Weyerhaeuser Substation.
Trowbridge Sub:
Sub:
Please print: Virginia Electric & Power Company (dba Dominion Energy North Carolina)
Property Owner:
Property Owner: Attn: Carl J. Lindemann, Jr.
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Jennifer B Johnson
(Contractor / Agent)
of C2 Environmental, Inc.
(Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
10900 Nuckols Road, 4th Floor, Henrico County, VA 23060
804-771-6408
Telephone:
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Carl J.Lindemann, Jr
ut ized Signature Authorized Signature
Date: 14�6�/d� Date:

ATTACHMENT B
Project Graphics
Trowbridge — Weyerhaeuser Transmission Lines
Applicant: Dominion Energy North Carolina
Agent: C2 Environmental, Inc.

a
Gott µa9S Rt!
°a
Project
Location
Pl��i„r�twn
1amesvilie
t
i
r
f �
c«
1 0�'
B
t
0 0.5 1 2 Miles
1:125,000at original document size of 8.5x11
Notes:
1. Date Prepared: 10/24/2018
.`, ENVIRONMENTAL
N
A
il
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan,
Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand),
NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
„ a
Martin & Washington Counties,
North Carolina
VICINITY MAP
Trowbridge — Weyerhaeuser Transmission Lines
Applicant/Client: Dominion Energy North Carolina

PERMANENT IMPACTS TABLE
x
1
i
u
V. �
1
1 •�
J 168/11A
168/3. ".� _ E1168/10
167/2 t 1� - X167 Weyerhaeuser
/9
El167/1�_ .� - �1s$/a , �s8/s Substation
j 168/1 .�`�,,;� .�" X167/8
Trowbridge
167/3 168/8 167/1 OA
Substation 167/18 .•-,168/5„ ,� �` 0167/7
,vs...-,` 168/7El
„.+
.167/4.
168/6 E]167/6
h.
El 167/5
l
a �
i
a t
, 1
„F
Source. Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics,CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS,AeroGF
- .User Community 1`
1Pm 4,10040-7rwb,,d, w rbeuser R,b.,WGIS_GADDMx 40Impach.
JURISDICTIONAL AREAS IMPACTS MAP
Trowbridge —Weyerhaeuser Transmission Lines
Martin and Washington Counties, North Carolina
Client/Applicant:
Dominion Energy North Carolina
C2 Env Project: Prepared By: Date:
0040 JAG 10/24/2018
0 250 500 1,000 Feet
Scale is 1:5,000 when printed at original size of 11x17
SITE DATA
Transmission Line Length +/- 1 mi
Project Area (+/- 36.7 ac)
LA Palustrine Forested Wetland (+/- 3.2 ac)
0 Palustrine Scrub/Shrub Wetland (+/- 5.4 ac)
Palustrine Emergent Wetland (+/- 12.4 ac)
Q Stream Channel (+/- 262 If, +/- 0.8 ac)
F1 Existing Structure
® Existing Structure Proposed for Replacement
Parcels
Contours
Select tree clearing and limbing may be
required to accomodate equipment on
existing access path at these locations.
Plymouth
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin,
USGS, Intermap,
INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri
Japan, METI, Esri China
Notes:
1. Base file from ESRI World Imagery 2018.
2. Structure locations provided by the Client.
3. Parcel data provided by NC OneMap, 2018.
4. Wetland delineation conducted by VHB, September 218. Wetlands and other
waters of the US have been field located by means of sub -meter GPS and have
not been confirmed by the US Army Corps of Engineers.
ENVIRONMENTAL Page 1 of 1
Impact Area by Wetland Type (SF)
PSS
PEM
Structure NumbersPFO
Line 168
168/3 - 168/7 &
0
0
120
168/9-168/10
Line 167
167/1 - 167/6 &
0
0
135
167/8-167/9
Sub -total:
0 SF
1 0 SF
255 SF
x
1
i
u
V. �
1
1 •�
J 168/11A
168/3. ".� _ E1168/10
167/2 t 1� - X167 Weyerhaeuser
/9
El167/1�_ .� - �1s$/a , �s8/s Substation
j 168/1 .�`�,,;� .�" X167/8
Trowbridge
167/3 168/8 167/1 OA
Substation 167/18 .•-,168/5„ ,� �` 0167/7
,vs...-,` 168/7El
„.+
.167/4.
168/6 E]167/6
h.
El 167/5
l
a �
i
a t
, 1
„F
Source. Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics,CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS,AeroGF
- .User Community 1`
1Pm 4,10040-7rwb,,d, w rbeuser R,b.,WGIS_GADDMx 40Impach.
JURISDICTIONAL AREAS IMPACTS MAP
Trowbridge —Weyerhaeuser Transmission Lines
Martin and Washington Counties, North Carolina
Client/Applicant:
Dominion Energy North Carolina
C2 Env Project: Prepared By: Date:
0040 JAG 10/24/2018
0 250 500 1,000 Feet
Scale is 1:5,000 when printed at original size of 11x17
SITE DATA
Transmission Line Length +/- 1 mi
Project Area (+/- 36.7 ac)
LA Palustrine Forested Wetland (+/- 3.2 ac)
0 Palustrine Scrub/Shrub Wetland (+/- 5.4 ac)
Palustrine Emergent Wetland (+/- 12.4 ac)
Q Stream Channel (+/- 262 If, +/- 0.8 ac)
F1 Existing Structure
® Existing Structure Proposed for Replacement
Parcels
Contours
Select tree clearing and limbing may be
required to accomodate equipment on
existing access path at these locations.
Plymouth
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin,
USGS, Intermap,
INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri
Japan, METI, Esri China
Notes:
1. Base file from ESRI World Imagery 2018.
2. Structure locations provided by the Client.
3. Parcel data provided by NC OneMap, 2018.
4. Wetland delineation conducted by VHB, September 218. Wetlands and other
waters of the US have been field located by means of sub -meter GPS and have
not been confirmed by the US Army Corps of Engineers.
ENVIRONMENTAL Page 1 of 1

U
U
m
0 -
En
z
0
0
0
0
0
m
M
M
B/M RBO'D FOR ONS INSTALLATION
1 37.02 42177693 TIN CCS, 94 SOLIO
2 44.00 57823000 CONN.. TRF. GROU1q
1 73324 42338407 IPB PILE. GkV STL 36-00 X z4
37.02
SLOPS FOR
DRAINAGE
44.00
0
a-
0 0 1 ..
CONCRETE .: � J � •. :�: 1RBVEAL
• , 03 3.0' MAX.
G] 1.-4. m
STAwiNG
MATER •
It L
T 0 A
GIR(>R , T 47 m
t0
• 31
n
/ ~
Z
O ID
F
O
M
t0 x
M
O N m
J
a
C3
a
CL
i
POLE INSTALLATION: WET HOLE
WATER ABOVE GROUNDLINE
DURING THE PLACEMENT
OF BACKFILL
GENERAL NOTES:
1. CLEAN OUT PIPE] PILE] TO RBO'D DBPTHs REVEAL + WATER DEPTH + 10% POLE LENGTH + 2'-0" + 2'-6'
MIN.
2. ADD SPECIFIED COMPACTED STONE BACKFILL - MINIMUM OF 2'-6" BELOW THE BASE PLATS OF THE
POLE. NCDOT 05 OR VDOT •57 SHALL BB PLACED TO THE LEVEL OF THE WATER.
3. BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED IN 4 INCH LIFTS. BACH LAYER SHALL BE COMPACTED USING
MECHANICAL OR PNUBMATIC TAMPERS. A MINIMUM OF 3 PASSES SHALL BE MADE OVER BACH LAYER.
ADDITIONAL PASSES ARE TO BE MADE IF DISPLACEMENT OF THE BACKFILL IS STILL EVIDENT ON
THE THIRD PASS. ROD EXTENSIONS SHALL BE ADDED TO THE TAMPER, AS RBOUIREO, IN ORDER FOR
THE OPERATOR TO MAINTAIN DOWNWARD PRESSURE ON THE UNIT AT ALL TIMES.
4. PLACE CONCRETE BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED. CONCRETE TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3500 PSI AT 28 DAYS.
5. EXISTING GROUND LEADS TO BB ATTACHED TO POLE AS DETAILED IN DWG 60.201.
Transmission Construction DOM POLO INSTALLATION DETAILS / PIPS PILE
IN STANDING WATER
r Dominion ORAWN I CHECKED JAPPROMIDATE DRAWING N0.
701 E. Cary Street ORIGINAL I sLS I KCH 08/15/18 1 1-0167-01-024
Richmond, VA 23219 REVISION I I I I I CAO NO. 1016701024

ATTACHMENT C
Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
Trowbridge — Weyerhaeuser Transmission Lines
Applicant: Dominion Energy North Carolina
Agent: C2 Environmental, Inc.

Wetland Delineation Report
Request for Preliminary
Jurisdictional Determination
TL 167/168 Trowbridge-Weyerha user Rebuild
Martin County and Washington County, NC
PREPARED FOR
Mr. Billy Standbridge
USACE Wilmington District - Regulatory Branch
Washington Field Office
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, NC 27889
PREPARED BY
�' hb.
Chris Senfield, PWS, PWD
VHB Williamsburg Office
351 McLaws Circle, Suite 3
Williamsburg, VA 23185
757.220.0500
9/28/2018

Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination — Wetland Delineation Report
Table of Contents
Introduction....................................................................................................................................................1
1.1 Study Area...........................................................................................................................................................................1
1.2 Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination.......................................................................................1
Methodology.................................................................................................................................................. 3
2.1 Offsite Analysis..................................................................................................................................................................3
2.2 Onsite Analysis..................................................................................................................................................................3
2.2.1 Wetland Boundary Location.......................................................................................................................4
2.2.2 USACE Data Collection.................................................................................................................................4
2.3 Quality Assurance and Quality Control...................................................................................................................4
Results............................................................................................................................................................. 7
3.1 Offsite Analysis..................................................................................................................................................................7
3.2 Onsite Analysis..................................................................................................................................................................8
Conclusion
Bibliography .....................
i Table of Contents
.......................................................................11
...........................................................................................................13

Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination — Wetland Delineation Report
List of Tables
Table No.
Description Page
Table 1
Summary of Cover Class Scale Used for Vegetation Sampling...................................4
Table 2
NRCS Soil Map Units within the 33.6 -acre TL167/168 Study Area ............................. 7
Table 3
NWI Map Units within the 33.6 -acre TL167/168 Study Area ..................................... 8
Table 4
Resource Types within the 33.6 -acre TL167/168 Study Area ..................................... 8
ii Table of Contents

Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination — Wetland Delineation Report
List of Appendices
Appendix No. Description
Page
AppendixA Study Area Figures.................................................................................................. A-1
Appendix B USACE Wetland Determination Forms....................................................................B-1
Appendix C Representative Site Photographs............................................................................0-1
Appendix D USACE Jurisdictional Determination Request Form ............................................... D-1
Appendix E Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form.......................................................E-1
iii Table of Contents

1
Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination — Wetland Delineation Report
*i's�i
�vhb.
Introduction
On behalf of Dominion Energy and C2 Environmental, Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.
(VHB) is requesting a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) within an electric
transmission line right-of-way (ROW) located in Martin County and Washington
County, North Carolina (Appendix A: Figure 1). The proposed project involves repair
and rebuilding activities within an existing Dominion Energy electric transmission
line near two existing substations (Trowbridge and Weyerhauser). To assist in the
completion of the PJD, VHB conducted a detailed delineation of Waters of the U.S.
(WOUS), including wetlands, within an approximate 33.6 -acre study area (Appendix
A: Figure 1).
1.1 Study Area
The 33.6 -acre study area is located just west of Plymouth, North Carolina, and
bisects land owned by the Domtar Paper Company. Near its northern extent, the
study area spans the main channel of Welch Creek, which forms the border between
Martin County and Washington County. Onsite elevation ranges from 0 feet above
sea level (ASL) at Welch Creek to 14 feet ASL near Sandhill Road. Study area
components include an existing 0.5 -mile -long gravel access road and a 1.1 -mile -
long corridor that follows the existing Dominion Energy transmission line right-of-
way.
The access road is located in a well-maintained clearing that connects to the
transmission line corridor to Sandhill Road (Route 149). The area within the clearing
is regularly mowed and relative flat, and aligns with a topographic rise near 4 feet
ASL. The transmission line corridor appears to have been subject to variable
degrees of vegetation management, leaving dense herbaceous plants along the
center of the corridor, and scrub -shrub communities that parallel the study area
boundary. Most of the transmission line corridor is bordered by forested land within
the floodplain of Welch Creek and the Roanoke River.
1.2 Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
VHB conducted a detailed delineation of wetlands and other WOUS within the study
area on September 12th, 2018. On behalf of Dominion Energy, VHB is requesting a
1 Introduction

Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination — Wetland Delineation Report
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE). Information required by the USACE to review and authorize the PJD is
provided in the narrative and appendices of this report, including study area figures
(Appendix A), USACE wetland determination data forms (Appendix B), representative
site photographs (Appendix C), a jurisdictional determination request form
(Appendix D), and a completed PJD form (Appendix E).
2 Introduction

2
Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination — Wetland Delineation Report
Vhb.
Methodology
VHB applied the technical criteria outlined in the Regional Supplement to the Corps
of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains Region
(Version 2.0) and associated guidance to identify jurisdictional boundaries within the
project area (USACE 2010). Preliminary site research was used to review soil types
identified by Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS, Appendix A: Figure 2)
as well as features depicted on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National
Wetland Inventory (Appendix A: Figure 3). Fieldwork was conducted on September
12, 2018.
2.1 Offsite Analysis
Preliminary offsite research for the investigation was conducted using data from
three sources:
• U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS) Quadrangle Map for Plymouth West, North
Carolina (USGS 2016)
• U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
(NRCS) Web Soil Survey (NRCS 2018)
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetland Inventory (USFWS
2018).
Datasets were downloaded from each of these sources and overlaid onto study area
mapping. Data layers for each dataset were processed using ArcMap 10.5.1 and
included as base maps for mobile applications through Collector for ArcGIS.
2.2 Onsite Analysis
Fieldwork was conducted on September 12, 2018 and was performed by VHB Senior
Scientist Christopher R. Senfield (PWS, PWD) and VHB Environmental Scientist Philip
Bailey (WPIT).
3 Methodology

Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination - Wetland Delineation Report
2.2.1 Wetland Boundary Location
Wetland boundaries were demarcated using pink flagging with the label "WETLAND
DELINEATION" and geo-located using Geographic Positioning System (GPS)
technology with sub -meter accuracy. The GPS hardware and software used in the
field included:
• Apple Wad Mini tablets loaded with Collector for ArcGIS; and,
• Trimble's R1 Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Receiver.
2.2.2 USACE Data Collection
Data was collected to describe hydrology, soil, and vegetation parameters
throughout the study area. Twelve data points were established to represent onsite
communities, and located geographically to show representative transitions between
wetland and non -wetland habitats. Data collected at each of the 12 points was used
to complete USACE wetland determination data forms (Appendix B).
Plant identification was based on Weakley (2016) and Weakley et al. (2012), and
nomenclature followed the 2016 USACE National Wetland Plant List (NWPL).
Vegetation abundance was expressed as percent cover for each species. Percent
cover was determined using a modified Daubenmire Cover Class Scale (Mueller-
Dombois and Ellenberg 1974), in which each species within a sampling plot was
placed into a cover class category. The midpoints of each cover class were then
used to record percent cover, as shown in Table 1 below.
Table 1 Summary of Cover Class Scale Used for Vegetation Sampling
Cover Class ID
Percent Cover Range (%)
Cover Class Midpoint (%)
1
0-1%
0.5
2
1-5%
3
3
5-25%
15
4
25-50%
38
5
50-75%
63
6
75-95%
85
7
95-100%
98
Source: Mueller-Dombois and Ellenberg 1974
2.3 Quality Assurance and Quality Control
VHB's standard quality assurance and quality control (QAQC) measures were
employed throughout the wetland delineation. Each project scientist was equipped
with VHB's mobile technology platform with access to real-time project data, base
maps, and reference material gathered from offsite analysis. Project maps displayed
with Collector for ArcGIS depicted 2016 color aerial imagery, topography with 2 -foot
contour intervals, USGS base mapping (USGS 2016), soil map units (NRCS 2018), and
National Wetland Inventory layers (USFWS 2018). Real-time mobile data review
4 Methodology

Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination — Wetland Delineation Report
tools (e.g. geo-located track -logs) were used in the field to track and measure onsite
progress, and for quality control by lead scientists.
5 Methodology

Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination — Wetland Delineation Report
Vhb-
Results
3.1 Offsite Analysis
Data resulting from VHB's offsite analysis includes assessments of site topography,
land cover, hydrology, soil types, and NWI wetlands (USGS 2016, NRCS 2018, USFWS
2018). Results pertaining to each of these data components are described below.
USGS 7.5 -minute Quadrangle Map
The study area is located within the Plymouth West, North Carolina USGS
Quadrangle (USGS 2016). The USGS map shows forested land along the
transmission line corridor and cleared land along the access road. Contour
elevations start at 0 feet ASL near Welch Creek, increasing to approximately 10 feet
ASL near the southern extent of the study area. Most of the study areas appears
within the floodplain of the Roanoke River and Welch Creek.
NRCS Soil Map
The NRCS Web Soil Survey (NRCS 2018) shows four map units within the study area.
Table 2 shows the map unit symbol, map unit name, and hydric classification for
each soil map unit.
Table 2 NRCS Soil Map Units within the 33.6 -acre TL167/168 Study Area
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Hydric Status
CtA
Conetoe loamy fine sand, 0-3 % slopes
Not hydric
Do
Dorovan muck
Hydric
WkB
Wickham loamy sand, 0-4% slopes
Partially hydric*
W
Water
Hydric
Source: NRCS 2018.
* "Partially hydric" refers to soil maps units with hydric soil inclusions.
National Wetland Inventory Map
The USFWS National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map depicts freshwater
forested/shrub wetlands and riverine stream channel within the study area. Map
unit symbols and descriptions are shown in Table 3.
7 Results

Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination — Wetland Delineation Report
Table 3 NWI Map Units within the 33.6 -acre TL167/168 Study Area
Unit Symbol
Map Unit Description
—Map
Palustrine, scrub -shrub, broad-leaved deciduous,
PSS1C
seasonally flooded
Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
Palustrine, forested, broad-leaved deciduous, seasonally
PF01C
flooded
Palustrine, forested, broad/needle-leaved deciduous,
PF01/2C
seasonally flooded
Palustrine, forested, broad-leaved deciduous or needle -
PF02/3C
leaved evergreen, seasonally flooded
Palustrine, forested, broad/needle-leaved deciduous, semi -
PF01/2F
permanently flooded
Riverine, lower perennial, unconsolidated bottom,
R2UBH
permanently flooded
Source: USFWS 2018
The remainder of the study area has no NWI features mapped by the USFWS (2018)
and appears as non -wetland community types along upland hillslopes and
ridgelines.
3.2 Onsite Analysis
The onsite wetland delineation determined that palustrine and riverine features are
present within the 33.6 -acre study area (Appendix A; Figure 4). Table 4 provides a
list of each resource type as classified using the Cowardin classification system
(Cowardin et al. 1979).
Table 4 Resource Types within the 33.6 -acre TL167/168 Study Area
Resource Type
Size
Palustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland
12.36 Acres
Palustrine Scrub -shrub (PSS) Wetland
5.39 Acres
Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland
3.12 Acres
Riverine Lower Perennial (R2) Stream Channel
272 Linear Feet
Palustrine Wetlands
The PEM wetlands identified during the field investigation were located within the
more recently maintained portion of the existing transmission line corridor. Most
wetlands appeared to be seasonally flooded; however, small areas of semi -
permanently flooded PEM wetlands were observed along the southern bank of
Welch Creek. Vegetation was categorized as persistent with dominant species such
as common reed (Phragmites australis), broad-leaved cattail (Typho latifolia), arrow -
leaf tearthumb (Persicaria sagittata), and soft rush (Juncus effusus). Soil profiles were
black to dark gray in color, and met hydric soil indicators for Indicator Al (Histosols),
Alt (Thick Dark Surface), or F3 (Depleted Matrix).
8 Results

Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination — Wetland Delineation Report
The PSS and PFO wetland types were found bordering the PEM wetlands, toward the
exterior of the study area corridor where transmission line maintenance has occurred
infrequently or not at all. Vegetation in PSS and PFO wetlands included black willow
(Salix nigra), red maple (Acer rubrum), sweet gum (Liquidombor styrocifluo), black
gum (Nysso sylvotico), and bald cypress (Toxodium distichum). Hydric soil and
wetland hydrology conditions were similar to those found in PEM wetlands, often
characterized by very dark soil colors and seasonal to semi-permanent flooding.
Riverine Lower Perennial Stream Channel
Welch Creek bisects the northmost part of the study area and was the only
riverine/stream feature observed during fieldwork. The creek was approximately 50
feet wide where it crosses the study area, and had defined banks formed mostly by
the edge of PEM wetlands in the adjacent floodplain. Water velocity appeared very
slow, likely due to the landscape position within the watershed and the high
connectivity to the adjacent floodplain. The edge of the creek appeared well-
defined by an ordinary high water mark (OHWM), as evidenced by a clear transition
between the unvegetated bed material and the densely vegetated banks.
Non -wetland Communities
Non -wetland features within the study area were predominantly occupied by upland
herbaceous communities within recently maintained segments of the transmission
line corridor. Vegetation was typically dominated by species such as dog fennel
(Eupatorium copillifolium), tall goldenrod (Solidago altissima), blackberry (Rubus
spp.), and winged sumac (Rhus copallinum). Substrate conditions within the upper
12 inches of the soil profile exhibited non-reducing conditions with brown and
yellowish -brown soil colors in the matrix. Wetland hydrology indicators were absent
in most uplands due to the prevalence of well -drained soils atop convex landforms
(e.g., rises, hillslopes, and ridges).
9 Results

El
Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination — Wetland Delineation Report
s�
�� m
h b
{:
Conclusion
The detailed wetland delineation conducted by VHB on
September 12th, 2018 identified PEM wetlands (12.36 acres), PSS
wetlands (5.39 acres), PFO wetlands (3.12 acres), and lower
perennial stream channel (272 linear feet) within the TL 167/168
Trowbridge-Weyerha user Rebuild study area.
This report documents the existing conditions within the study area, and includes
appendices with study area figures (Appendix A), USACE wetland determination data
forms (Appendix B), representative photographs (Appendix C), and a jurisdictional
determination request form (Appendix D). The results of the investigation are also
provided on a USACE Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form (Appendix E)
VHB would like to arrange an onsite meeting to review the results of the wetland
delineation. Please contact Chris Senfield ([e-mail]) if you have any
questions or require any additional information.
11 Conclusion

5
Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination — Wetland Delineation Report
%b.
Bibliography
Cowardin, L. M., V. Carter, F. C. Golet, and E. T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U. S. Department of the
Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C.
Lichvar, R.W., D.L. Banks, W.N. Kirchner, and N.C. Melvin. 2016. The National Wetland
Plant List: 2016 wetland ratings. Phytoneuron 2016-30:1-17. Published 28 April
2016. ISSN 2153 733X.
Muller-Dombois, D., & Ellenberg, H. 1974. Aims and Methods in Vegetation Ecology.
New York John Wiley and Sons.
Radford, A. E., H. E. Ahles, and C. R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the
Carolinas. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, N.C.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of
Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coast Region (Version 2.0).
Wetland Regulatory Assistance Program. May.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA,
NRCS). 2016. The PLANTS Database (http://plants.usda.gov). National Plant Data
Team, Greensboro, NC 27401-4901 USA.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service. Web Soil
Survey. Available online at http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/. Accessed
September 11, 2018.
U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS) Quadrangle Map. 2016. Plymouth West, North Carolina.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2018. National Wetland Inventory. Available
online at https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.htm. Accessed September 11,
2018.
Weakley, A. S. 2016. Flora of the Southern and Mid -Atlantic States. Working Draft.
UNC Herbarium. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC.
Weakley, Alan S., J. Christopher Ludwig, John F. Townsend, and Bland Crowder. 2012.
Flora of Virginia. Fort Worth, Tex: Botanical Research Institute of Texas Press.
13 Bibliography

Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination — Wetland Delineation Report
This page intentionally left blank.
14 Bibliography

Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination — Wetland Delineation Report
Appendices
%b.
Appendices

Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination — Wetland Delineation Report
This page intentionally left blank.
Appendices

Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination — Wetland Delineation Report
Appendix A - Study Area Figures
Appendices

Iiia,.._. -
September 25, 2018
h t k r,
A
t
r
i
Service Layer Credits: 'Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp.,
Study Area (33.6 Ac) GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL,
Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, MET], Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo,
Mapmylndia, © OpenStreelMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
' ...�•°_�L TL 167/168 Trowbridge -Weyerhauser Rebuild
T Feet
0 1,000 2'000 V b Plymouth, North Carolina
EhVIFJN.NEN 1n;
Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
FIGURE 1
Project Location Map

Study Area (33.6 Ac)
Soil Map Unit Boundary
CtA - Conetoe loamy fine sand, 0-3% slopes
Do - Dorovan muck
WkB - Wickham loamy sand, 04% slopes
W - Water
W
Miles
0 0.025 0.05 0.1
ffj-.� A&A
c i' TL 167/168 Trowbrid ge-Weyerhauser Rebuild
ENVIRONMENTAL Vhb Plymouth, North Carolina
Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
FIGURE 2
Soils Map

"...:1;' TL 167/168 Trowbridge -Weyerhauser Rebuild
Miles
ENV iaor+MENTAL Yhb Plymouth, North Carolina
0 0.025 0.05 0.1
Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
FIGURE 3
National Wetlands Inventory Map

N
€>
Q-
O
E
r•
ct)
a
0
Q
E
a
u�
i
0
'S
A
Q)
�.0
co
Q-
c`
E
r•
ct)
ti
u�
i
�.0
co
c`
E
r•
ct)
:•
Study Area (33.6 Ac) Natural Resource Features
; County Boundary Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetland (3.12 Ac)
Topography (Cl = 2 Ft) Palustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetland (12.36 Ac)
Flag Identifier Palustrine Scrub/Shrub (PSS) Wetland (5.39 Ac)
o Data Point Lower Perennial (R2) Stream Channel (272 LF)
IN
� Sanlow
Q Q) 100 150 0 300 Feet
. ;Ns
.4" TL 167/168 Trowbridge-Weyerhauser Rebuild
E"wI 4MENTA'L Vhb Plymouth, North Carolina
Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
FIGURE 4
Wetland Delineation Map
c`
E
r•
IN
� Sanlow
Q Q) 100 150 0 300 Feet
. ;Ns
.4" TL 167/168 Trowbridge-Weyerhauser Rebuild
E"wI 4MENTA'L Vhb Plymouth, North Carolina
Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
FIGURE 4
Wetland Delineation Map
i
A
IN
� Sanlow
Q Q) 100 150 0 300 Feet
. ;Ns
.4" TL 167/168 Trowbridge-Weyerhauser Rebuild
E"wI 4MENTA'L Vhb Plymouth, North Carolina
Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
FIGURE 4
Wetland Delineation Map

Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination — Wetland Delineation Report
Appendix 6 - USACE Wetland
Determination Forms
Appendices

'hb. WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region DP -1
r
Project Site: TL 167/168 Trowbridge City/County: Martin Samp. Date: 9/12/2018
Applicant/Owner: Dominion Energy State: North Carolina Sampling Point: DP -1
Investigator(s): C. Senfield (PWS, PWD) & P. Bailey (WPIT) Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 0 to 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LLR T/ MLRA 153A Lat: 35.861895 Long: -76.769513 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit: Dorovan muck, frequently flooded NWI Map Unit: Upland
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Normal Circumstances? Yes
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
3urvlivuAmy ur rii4timiu3 - MLLdUI blte Il ldp Glluwil% bdl I IpIC pUl nt IUt.dtlUI u, Lt Ctl IZIol.Lu, uiipul tams ICdtuI c�, CLQ.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? NO
Hydric Soil Present? NO Is This Sample Area Within a Wetland? NO
Wetland Hvdroloev Present? NO
One or more parameters lacking. Area is not a jurisdictional wetland.
Observation point located in maintained field near flag WA -15. Some ruts are present from mowing.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (815)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (816)
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (0)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial (B7)
FAC -Neutral Test (DS)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Dark Surface (S7)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Field Observations:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
Black Histic (A3)
Surface Water Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Water Table Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? NO
Saturation Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
N/A
lcm Muck (A9)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Remarks: No primary or secondary indicators of wetland hydrology present; parameter is not met.
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
MAI
Profile Description: Describe tote depth needed to
document the indicator or confirm theabsence of indicators.
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(in) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type'
Loc' Texture Remarks
0-20 2.SY2/1 100
loamy sand
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (All
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Stratified Layers (AS)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
lcm Muck (A9)
Redox Depressions (F8)
' Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Umbric Surface (F13)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Stripped Matrix (56)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: N/A
Hydric Soil Present? NO
Depth (inches): N/A
Remarks: No hydric soil indicators present and soil does not meet NTCHS definition of hydric soil; parameter is not met.
Mulch is present from 20-25in.
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. DeBerry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. �Wb Sampling Point: DP-1
VIIIII
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10' radius )
1.
Sorghum halepense
2.
Digitaria ischaemum
3.
Setaria parviflora
4.
Solanum carolinense
5.
Paspalum urvillei
6.
7.
8.
9.
= Total Cover
63 X FACU
10.
15 FACW
11.
3 FAC
12.
Woody Vines (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
% Cover Sp? Status` Dominance Test Worksheet:
# Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: O (A)
# Dominants across all strata: 1 (B)
% Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: O (A/B)
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20ft (1 to
6m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines,
regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than
approximately 3ft (lm) in height.
111 = Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
No hydrophytic vegetation indicators present; parameter is not met.
Indicator status utilizes 2016 NWPL
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover Present? NO
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. DeBerry, PhD, PWS, PWD)
= Total Cover
Total %Cover of: Multiply By:
OBL x 1=
FACW 15 x2= 30
FAC 3 x3= 9
FACU 78 x4= 312
UPL 15 x5= 75
Sum: 111 (A) 426 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.84
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Dominance Test is> 50%
Prevalence Index is <= 3.0
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (explain)
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Morphological Adaptations
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
more in height and 3in (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
more in height and less than 3in (7.6cm) DBH.
= Total Cover
63 X FACU
15 UPL
15 FACW
15 FACU
3 FAC
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20ft (1 to
6m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines,
regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than
approximately 3ft (lm) in height.
111 = Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
No hydrophytic vegetation indicators present; parameter is not met.
Indicator status utilizes 2016 NWPL
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover Present? NO
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. DeBerry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

�rhb.WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region DP -2
Project Site: TL 167/168 Trowbridge City/County: Martin Samp. Date: 9/12/2018
Applicant/Owner: Dominion Energy State: North Carolina Sampling Point: DP -2
Investigator(s): C. Senfield (PWS, PWD) & P. Bailey (WPIT) Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hnlslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0 to 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LLRT/ MLRA 153A Lat: 35.861881 Long: -76.769135 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit: Dorovan muck, frequently flooded NWI Map Unit: Upland
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Normal Circumstances? Yes
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
�PUIVIIVIAKY Ut- t-IIVUIIN(JZ) - Aitacn site map snowing Sample point locations, transeCTS, Important Teatures, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YES
Hydric Soil Present? YES Is This Sample Area Within a Wetland? YES
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES
Remarks: All parameters are met. Area is classified as a palustrine emergent (PEM) wetland.
Observation point located in maintained floodplain depression near flag WA -14. Some ruts present from mowing.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Depth Matrix
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required;
check all that apply)
Surface Soil cracks (B6)
Surface Water (All
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (B15)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
X Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (Bl)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (82)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (85)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial (B7)
Organic Bodies (A6)
X FAC -Neutral Test (DS)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Field Observations:
lcm Muck (A9)
Redox Depressions (F8)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Surface Water Present? NO
Depth (inches):
wetland hydrology must be present,
X Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Water Table Present? YES
Depth (inches): Surface
Wetland
Hydrology Present? YES
Saturation Present? YES
Depth (inches): Surface
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
N/A
Remarks: At least one primary or two secondary indicators of wetland hydrology present; parameter is met.
SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe tote depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(in) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type'
Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-25 2.5Y 2.5/1 100
sandy loam Mixed with mulch at 22in.
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix,
MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Stratified Layers (AS)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
lcm Muck (A9)
Redox Depressions (F8)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12)
wetland hydrology must be present,
X Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Umbric Surface (F13)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: N/A
Hydric Soil Present? YES
Depth (inches): N/A
Remarks:
Indicator Al2 (Thick Dark Surface) present and soil meets NTCHS definition of hydric soil; parameter is met.
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. DeBerry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. N * b Sampling Point: DP -2
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10' radius )
1.
Juncus effusus
2.
Diodia virgimana
3.
Murdannia keisak
4.
Scirpus atrovirens
5.
Echinochloa muricata
6.
Phragmites australis
7.
Persicaria hydropiperoides
8.
Carex projecta
9.
Eleocharis tenuis
10.
11.
= Total
12.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Dominance Test is > 50%
Prevalence Index is <= 3.0
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (explain)
X Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Morphological Adaptations
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic.
Woody Vines (Plot size
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Absolute
Cover
Dom.
Sp?
Indicator
Status*
Dominance Test Worksheet:
It Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: (A)
# Dominants across all strata: (B)
Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply By:
OBL x 1 =
FACW x 2 =
FAC x3=
FACU x4=
UPL x5=
Sum: (A) (B)
Prevalence index = B/A =
= Total Cover
= Total
Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Dominance Test is > 50%
Prevalence Index is <= 3.0
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (explain)
X Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Morphological Adaptations
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
more in height and 3in (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
more in height and less than 3in (7.6cm) DBH.
Shrub -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20ft (1 to
6m) in height.
= Total Cover
1s X OBL
15 X FACW
15 X OBL
15 X OBL
3 FACW
3 FACW
3 OBL
3 FACW
3 FACW
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines,
regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than
approximately 3ft (lm) in height.
75 = Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover Present? YES
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Indicator 1 (Rapid Test) present due to dominance of FACW or OBL species.
* Indicator status utilizes 2016 NWPL
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. DeBerry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

`' WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region DP -3
` Vhb.
Project Site: TL 167/168 Trowbridge City/County: Martin Samp. Date: 9/12/2018
Applicant/Owner: Dominion Energy State: North Carolina Sampling Point: DP -3
Investigator(s): C. Senfield (PWS, PWD) & P. Bailey (WPIT) Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hlllslope, terrace, etc): Channel Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0 to 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LLR T/ MLRA 153A Lat: 35.861875 Long: -76.769142 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit: Water NWI Map Unit: R2UBH
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Normal Circumstances? Yes
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sample point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? NO
Hydric Soil Present? YES Is This Sample Area Within a Wetland? NO
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES T_
Remarks: Non -vegetated waters of the U.S. (open waterbody).
Observation point located in perennial tributary (Welch Creek) to Roanoke River near flag WB -13.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Depth Matrix
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required;
check all that apply)
Surface Soil cracks (B6)
X Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (BSS)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (Bl)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (0)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (BS)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial (B7)
Histosol (Al)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Sphagnum Moss (DS)
Field Observations:
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (59)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Surface Water Present? YES
Depth (inches): >12
Red Parent Material (F21)
Stratified Layers IA5)
Water Table Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? YES
Saturation Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Redox Depressions (F8)
N/A
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
Remarks: At least one primary or two secondary indicators of wetland hydrology present; parameter is met.
M
Profile Description: Describe tot e depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(in) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc'
Texture Remarks
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix,
MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck IA10)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (59)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Stratified Layers IA5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
lcm Muck (A9)
Redox Depressions (F8)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Umbric Surface (1`13)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (54)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: N/A
Hyd Tic Soil Present? YES
Depth (inches): N/A
Remarks:
No retreival due to depth of water; soil assumed to be hydric due to water regime.
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. DeBerry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. `Ub Sampling Point: DP -3
Tree Stratum
1.
(Plot size:
30' radius )
Absolute Dom. Indicator
% Cover Sp? Status*
Dominance Test Worksheet:
# Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 0 (A)
# Dominants across all strata: 0 (B)
% Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 0 (A/B)
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
Total %Cover of: Multiply By:
OBL 0 x 1= 0
FACW 0 x2= 0
FAC 0 x3= 0
FACU 0 x4= 0
UPL 0 X5= 0
Sum: 0 (A) 0 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 0
= Total Cover
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
2•
3.
4•
5•
6.
7•
Shrub Stratum
1.
(Plot size:
15' radius )
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Dominance Test is> 50%
Prevalence Index is <= 3.0
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (explain)
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Morphological Adaptations
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
more in height and 31n (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 2oft (6m) or
more in height and less than 3in (7.6cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20ft (1 to
6m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines,
regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than
approximately aft (lm) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? NO
2.
3•
4•
5.
6.
7.
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
6.
7.
8.
9
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
Woody Vines (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
rks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
No hydrophytic vegetation indicators present; parameter is not met.
* Indicator status utilizes 2016 NWPL
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. DeBerry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

*`1fVilb WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region DP -4
Project Site: TL 167/168 Trowbridge City/County: Washington Samp. Date: 9/12/2018
Applicant/Owner: Dominion Energy State: North Carolina Sampling Point: DP -4
Investigator(s): C. Senfield (PWS, PWD) & P. Bailey (WPIT) Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0 to 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LLR T/ MLRA 153A Lat: 35.859925 Long: -76.768497 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit: Donovan muck, frequently flooded NWI Map Unit: PSS1C
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Normal Circumstances? Yes
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMAKY OF FINUINGS - Attacn Site map snowing Sample point locations, transects, Imporiam Teaiures, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YES
Hydric Soil Present? YES Is This Sample Area Within a Wetland? YES
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES
Remarks: All parameters are met. Area is classified as a palustrine emergent (PEM) wetland.
Observation point located in floodplain of Welch Creek, near flag WBI-19.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Depth Matrix
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required;
check all that apply)
Surface soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (A1)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
X High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (B15)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (Bl)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (82)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard 03)
Inundation Visible on Aerial (B7)
X Histosol (Al)
X FAC -Neutral Test (DS)
Water -Stained Leaves (89)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Field Observations:
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Surface Water Present? YES
Depth (inches): 10
Red Parent Material (F21)
Stratified Layers (AS)
Water Table Present? YES
Depth (inches): Surface
Wetland
Hydrology Present? YES
Saturation Present? YES
Depth (inches): Surface
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Redox Depressions (F8)
N/A
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12)
Remarks: At least one primary or two secondary indicators of wetland hydrology present; parameter is met.
Soil
Profile Description: (Describe tot the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(in) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type'
Loc' Texture Remarks
0-20 2.5Y 2/2 100
muck 8 inches of peat above soil surface.
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM -Reduced Matrix,
MS=Masked Sand Grains,
Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
X Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Stratified Layers (AS)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Scm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
lcm Muck (A9)
Redox Depressions (F8)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Umbric Surface (F13)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: N/A
Hydric Soil Present? YES
Depth (inches): N/A
Remarks:
Indicator Al (Histosol) present and soil meets NTCHS definition of hydric soil; parameter is met.
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. DeBerry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Vl lb Sampling Point: DP -4
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Absolute Dom. Indicator
30' radius ) % Cover Sp? Status*
Dominance Test Worksheet:
It Dominants COL, FACW, FAC: (A)
# Dominants across all strata: (B)
Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: (A/B)
FACW x2=
FAC x3=
FACU x4=
UPL x5=
Sum: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
2.
3.
4.
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
Total %Cover of: Multiply By:
OBL x 1=
= Total Cover
30' radius )
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius )
1.
FACW x2=
FAC x3=
FACU x4=
UPL x5=
Sum: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
6.
7.
Herb
Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
Phragmites australis
2.
Typha latifolia
3.
Pontederia cordata
4.
Persicaria hydropiperoides
5.
Sagittaria lancifolia
6.
Murdannia keisak
7.
Peltandra virginica
8.
Taxodium distichum
9.
10.
11,
12.
Woody Vines (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover Present? YES
ks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Indicator 1(Rapid Test) present due to dominance of FACW or OBL species.
* Indicator status utilizes 2016 NWPL
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. DeBerry, PhD, PWS, PWD)
FACW x2=
FAC x3=
FACU x4=
UPL x5=
Sum: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Dominance Test is > 50%
Prevalence Index is <= 3.0
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (explain)
X Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Morphological Adaptations
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
more in height and Sin (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
more in height and less than 3in (7.6cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20ft (1 to
6m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines,
regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than
approximately aft (lm) in height.
= Total Cover
63 X FACW
38 X OBL
15 OBL
1S 081.
3 0131.
3 0131.
3 OBL
3 OBL
143 = Total Cover
Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover Present? YES
ks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Indicator 1(Rapid Test) present due to dominance of FACW or OBL species.
* Indicator status utilizes 2016 NWPL
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. DeBerry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region DP -5
Project Site: TL 167/168 Trowbridge City/County: Washington Samp. Date: 9/12/2018
Applicant/Owner: Dominion Energy State: North Carolina Sampling Point: DP -5
Investigator(s): C. Senfield (PWS, PWD) & P. Bailey (WPIT) Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Rise/hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 2 to 4
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LLR T/ MLRA 153A Lat: 35.859659 Long: -76.768549 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit: Wickham loamy sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes NWI Map Unit: PSSic
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Normal Circumstances? Yes
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sample point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? NO
Hydric Soil Present? NO Is This Sample Area Within a Wetland? NO
Wetland Hydrology Present? NO
Remarks: One or more parameters lacking. Area is not a jurisdictional wetland.
Observation point located in right-of-way on upland hillslope near flag WB -21.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (86)
Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (815)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (1336)
Water Marks (81)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (CS)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial (87)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Field Observations:
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Surface Water Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Scm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Water Table Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? NO
Saturation Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Umbric Surface (F13)
N/A
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Remarks: No primary or secondary indicators of wetland hydrology present; parameter is not met.
Sandy Redox (SS)
SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe tote depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(in) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type'
Loc, Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 3/2 100
loamy sand
—2-W 10YR 4/3
loamy sand
10-16 30YR 4/4 100
loamy sand
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix,
MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (57)
2 cm Muck (A10)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Stratified Layers (AS)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Scm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Scm Muck (A9)
Redox Depressions (F8)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Umbric Surface (F13)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Sandy Redox (SS)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: N/A
Hydric Soil Present? NO
Depth (inches): N/A
Remarks: No hydric soil indicators present and soil does not meet NTCHS definition of hydric soil; parameter is not met.
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. DeBerry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Absolute Do
Cover Sp?
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10' radius )
1. Eupatorium capillifolium
38
2. Chamaecrista fasciculata
38
3. Solidago altissima
15
4. Rubus pensilvanicus
15
5. Dichanthelium dichotomum
3
6. Potentilla indica
3
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vines (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Vitis rotundifolia
11
15
2. Lonicera japonica
15
3.
4.
5.
�`YY�,�, Sampling Point: DP -5
„
Dom
Indicator
Status* Dominance Test Worksheet:
# Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 1 (A)
# Dominants across all strata: 4 (B)
Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 25% (A/B)
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
= Total Cover Total % Cover of: Multiply By:
OBL x 1=
FACW x2=
FAC 33 x3= 99
FACU 109 x4= 436
UPL X5=
Sum: 142 (A) 535 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.77
= Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Dominance Test is > 50%
Prevalence Index is <= 3.0
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (explain)
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Morphological Adaptations
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
= Total Cover
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woodyvines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
X FACU more in height and 3in (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
X FACU
FACU
FAC Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woodyvines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
FAC more in height and lessthan 31n (7.6cm) DBH.
Shrub -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20ft (1 to
6m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines,
regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than
approximately 3ft (lm) in height.
2 = Total Cover
X FAC
X FACU Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
30 = Total Cover Present? NO
ks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
No hydrophytic vegetation indicators present; parameter is not met.
*Indicator status utilizes 2016 NWPL
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. DeBerry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

�'V%b, WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region DP -6
Project Site: TL 167/168 Trowbridge City/County: Washington Samp. Date: 9/12/2018
Applicant/Owner: Dominion Energy State: North Carolina Sampling Point: DP -6
Investigator(s): C. Senfield (PWS, PWD) & P. Bailey (WPIT) Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 2 to 4
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LLR T/ MLRA 153A Lat: 35.858490 Long: - 76.769375 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit: Dorovan muck, frequently flooded NWI Map Unit: P5s1C
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Normal Circumstances? Yes
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sample point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes
Hydric Soil Present? YES Is This Sample Area Within a Wetland? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES
Remarks: All parameters are met. Area is classified as a palustrine emergent (PEM) wetland.
Observation point located in wetland depression WE along access road, below 12 inch metal pipe culvert under access road.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Depth Matrix
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required;
check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (1315)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (82)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (133)
Inundation Visible on Aerial (137)
Histosol (Al)
X FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Field Observations:
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Surface Water Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Red Parent Material (F21)
Stratified Layers (AS)
Water Table Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES
Saturation Present? NO
Depth (inches):
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
lcm Muck (A9)
N/A
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Remarks: At least one primary or two secondary indicators of wetland hydrology present; parameter is met.
Soil
Profile Description: (Describe tote depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(in) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type'
Loc' Texture Remarks
0-3 2.513/3 100
—
sandy loam
—
--§F—
.5Y S79--
SIV sandy loam
Type: C=Concentration, D -Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix,
MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (SS)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Stratified Layers (AS)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
lcm Muck (A9)
Redox Depressions (F8)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Umbric Surface (F13)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Sandy Redox (SS)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: N/A
Hydric Soil Present? YES
Depth (inches): N/A
Remarks: Indicator F3 (Depleted Matrix) present and soil meets NTCHS definition of hydric soil; parameter is met.
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. DeBerry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10' radius )
1.
Dichanthelium clandestinum
2.
Digitaria ischaemum
3.
Setaria parviflora
4.
Carex lurida
5.
Andropogon virginicus
6.
Lespedeza cuneata
7.
Campsis radicans
8.
Cyperus iria
9.
38 X UPL
10.
15 OBL
11.
3 FACU
12.
3 FACW
woody Vines (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
S.
�Y11� Sampling Point: DP -6
4bsolute Dom. Indicator
%Cover Sp? Status' Dominance Test Worksheet:
# Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 1 (A)
It Dominants across all strata: 2 (B)
% Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 50% (A/B)
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply By:
OBL 15 x 1= 15
FACW 56 x2= 112
FAC 18 x3= 54
FACU 3 x4= 12
UPL 38 X5= 190
Sum: 130 (A) 383 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.95
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Dominance Test is > 50%
X Prevalence Index is <= 3.0
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (explain)
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Morphological Adaptations
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
more in height and 31n (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
more in height and less than 3in (7.6cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20ft (1 to
6m) in height.
= Total Cover
38 X FACW
38 X UPL
35 FACW
15 OBL
15 FAC
3 FACU
3 FAC
3 FACW
He - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines,
regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than
approximately 3ft (1m) in height.
130 = Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover Present? Yes
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Indicator 3 (Prevalence Index) present with a Prevalence Index value of 3.0 or less.
* Indicator status utilizes 2016 NWPL
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. DeBerry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

�40vhb, WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region DP -7
Project Site: TL 167/168 Trowbridge City/County: Washington Samp. Date: 9/12/2018
Applicant/Owner: Dominion Energy State: North Carolina Sampling Point: DP -7
Investigator(s): C. Senfield (PWS, PWD) & P. Bailey (WPIT) Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0 to 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LLR T/ MI RA 153A Lat: 35.858255 Long: - 76.768633 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit: Wickham loamy sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes NWI Map Unit: Pss1C
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Normal Circumstances? Yes
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
5UMMAKY UF FINUINUb - Attacn Site map Snowing Sample point locations, transects, Important Teatures, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YES
Hydric Soil Present? NO Is This Sample Area Within a Wetland? NO
Wetland Hydrology Present? NO
Remarks: One or more parameters lacking. Area is not a jurisdictional wetland.
Observation point located on flat hillslope above wetland WC.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (813)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (815)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (816)
Water Marks (Bl)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (82)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (84)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial (87)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
FAC -Neutral Test (DS)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Field Observations:
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Surface Water Present? NO
Depth (inches):
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Water Table Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? NO
Saturation Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Umbric Surface (1`13)
N/A
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Remarks: No primary or secondary indicators of wetland hydrology present; parameter is not met.
Sandy Redox (S5)
Soil
Profile Description: (Describe tote depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(in) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type'
Loc' Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 3/2 100
fine sandy loam
1 .5 lbw--75­amy`sa_ncT
15-18 2.5Y 4/4 100
loamy sand
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix,
MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Stratified Layers (AS)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
lcm Muck (A9)
Redox Depressions (F8)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Umbric Surface (1`13)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: N/A
Hyd ric Soil Present? NO
Depth (inches): N/A
Remarks: No hydric soil indicators present and soil does not meet NTCHS definition of hydric soil; parameter is not met.
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. DeBerry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.b Sampling Point: DP -7
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius )
1.
Morella cerifera
2.
Acer rubrum
3.
Liquidambar styraciflua
4.
Quercus nigra
5.
Potentilla indica
6.
Passiflora suberosa
7.
Persicaria hydropiperoides
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10' radius )
1.
Rubus pensilvanicus
2.
Lespedeza cuneata
3.
Lonicera japonica
4.
Gelsemium sempervirens
5.
Potentilla indica
6.
Passiflora suberosa
7.
Persicaria hydropiperoides
8.
9.
10.
11.
= Total
X
12.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
X Dominance Test is > 50%
Prevalence Index is <= 3.0
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (explain)
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Morphological Adaptations
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic.
Woody Vines (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Campsis radicans
2.
3.
4.
5.
ADsoiute
%Cover
Uom.
Sp?
maicator
Status*
Dominance Test Worksheet:
fr Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 6 (A)
It Dominants across all strata: 8 (B)
% Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 75% (A/B)
63 X FAC
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply By:
OBL x 1=
FACW x2=
FAC x3=
FACU x4=
UPL x5=
Sum: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
63 = Total Cover
15 X FAC
15
15
= Total
X
Cover
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
X Dominance Test is > 50%
Prevalence Index is <= 3.0
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (explain)
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Morphological Adaptations
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic.
3 FAC
3 FAC
1 FAC
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
more in height and 3in (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
more in height and less than 3in (7.6cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20ft (1 to
6m) in height.
22 = Total Cover
15 X FAC
15 X FACU
15 X FACU
15 X FAC
3 FACU
3 UPL
1 OBL
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines,
regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than
approximately aft (lm) in height.
67 = Total Cover
38 X FAC
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
38 = Total Cover Present? YES
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Indicator 2 (Dominance Test) present with >50% of dominant species across all vegetation strata FAC or wetter.
* Indicator status utilizes 2016 NWPL
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. DeBerry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

b. WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region DP -8
vh
Project Site: TL 167/168 Trowbridge City/County: Washington Samp.Date:9/12/2018
Applicant/Owner: Dominion Energy State: North Carolina Sampling Point: DP -8
Investigator(s): C. Senfield (PWS, PWD) & P. Bailey (WPIT) Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0 to 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LLR T/ MLRA 253A Lat: 35.85796 Long: - 76.768513 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit: Wickham loamy sand, Oto 4 percent slopes NWI Map Unit: PSs1C
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Normal Circumstances? Yes
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sample point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YES
Hydric Soil Present? YES Is This Sample Area Within a Wetland? YES
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES
Remarks: All parameters are met. Area is classified as a palustrine forested (PFO) wetland.
Observation point located in wetland depression near flag WC -3.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Depth Matrix
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required;
check all that apply)
Surface Soil cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (1315)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (Bl)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (08)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial (137)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
X Water -Stained Leaves (89)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Field Observations:
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Scm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Surface Water Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Scm Muck (A9)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Water Table Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES
Saturation Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Umbric Surface (F13)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
N/A
Sandy Redox (55)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Remarks: At least one primary or two secondary indicators of wetland hydrology present; parameter is met.
SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe tote depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(in) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type'
Loc' Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 3/2 100
sandy loam
__10-
—�
—1i7� san y oam
16-22 10YR 5/4 100
loamy sand Compacted layer.
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Stratified Layers (AS)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Scm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Scm Muck (A9)
Redox Depressions (F8)
' Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Umbric Surface (F13)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Sandy Redox (55)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: Sand
Hydric Soil Present? YES
Depth (inches): 16
Remarks: Indicator F3 (Depleted Matrix) present and soil meets NTCHS definition of hydric soil; parameter is met.
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. DeBerry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Vl lb Sampling Point: DP -8
6
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius )
1.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
2.
Acer rubrum
3.
Ulmus rubra
4.
5.
6.
7.
76 = Total Cover
15 X FAC
3 FAC
Sapling
Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius )
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
2.
Acer rubrum
3.
Woodwardia areolata
4.
Lonicera japonica
5.
Toxicodendron radicans
6.
Glyceria striata
7.
Carex lurida
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius )
1.
Acer rubrum
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
3.
Ulmus rubra
4.
5.
6.
7.
76 = Total Cover
15 X FAC
3 FAC
Herb
Stratum (Plot size: 10' radius )
1.
Campsis radicans
2.
Ulmus rubra
3.
Woodwardia areolata
4.
Lonicera japonica
5.
Toxicodendron radicans
6.
Glyceria striata
7.
Carex lurida
8.
Cinna arundinacea
9.
3 FAC
10.
3 OBL
11.
12.
Woody Vines (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
Campsis radicans
2.
3.
4.
5.
%Cover
Sp?
Status*
Dominance Test Worksheet:
# Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 8 (A)
# Dominants across all strata: 8 (B)
% Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 100% (A/B)
38 X FAC
38 X FAC
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply By:
OBL x 1 =
FACW x2=
FAC x3=
FACU x4=
UPL x5=
Sum: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
76 = Total Cover
15 X FAC
3 FAC
18
15
= Total
X
Cover
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
X Dominance Test is>50%
Prevalence Index is <= 3.0
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (explain)
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Morphological Adaptations
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
more in height and Sin (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
more in height and less than 3in (7.6cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20ft (1 to
6m) in height.
3 FAC
3 FAC
21 = Total Cover
15 X FAC
15 X FAC
35 X OBL
3 FACU
3 FAC
3 OBL
3 OBL
3 FACW
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines,
regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than
approximately 3ft (lm) in height.
60 = Total Cover
15 X FAC
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
15 = Total Cover Present? YES
rks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Indicator 2 (Dominance Test) present with >50% of dominant species across all vegetation strata FAC or wetter.
* Indicator status utilizes 2016 NWPL
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. DeBerry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

s°
` *�'I WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region DP -9
Project Site: TL 167/168 Trowbridge City/County: Washington Samp. Date: 9/12/2018
Applicant/Owner: Dominion Energy State: North Carolina Sampling Point: DP -9
Investigator(s): C. Senfield (PWS, PWD) & P. Bailey (WPIT) Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Bottomland Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0 to 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LLR T/ MLRA 153A Lat: 35.852261 Long: - 76.769150 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit: Dorovan muck, frequently flooded NWI Map Unit: PSS1C
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Normal Circumstances? Yes
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINUINC>> - Attacn site map Snowing Sample point locations, transects, Important Teatures, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YES
Hydric Soil Present? YES Is This Sample Area Within a Wetland? YES
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES
Remarks: All parameters are met. Area is classified as a palustrine emergent (PEM) wetland.
Observation point located in broad bottomland community near flag WD -18.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Depth Matrix
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required;
check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
X High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (1315)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (84)
Thin Muck Surface (0)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial (B7)
Organic Bodies (A6)
X FAC -Neutral Test (DS)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Field Observations:
lcm Muck (A9)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Surface Water Present? YES
Depth (inches): 3
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
Water Table Present? YES
Depth (inches): Surface
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES
Saturation Present? YES
Depth (inches): Surface
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
N/A
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Remarks: At least one primary or two secondary indicators of wetland hydrology present; parameter is met.
SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm theabsence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(in) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type'
Loc' Texture Remarks
0-16 2.5Y 2.5/1 100
muck
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix,
MS -Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
X Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Stratified Layers (AS)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
lcm Muck (A9)
Redox Depressions (F8)
a Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Umbric Surface (1`13)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: N/A
Hydric Soil Present? YES
Depth (inches): N/A
Remarks:
Indicator Al (Histosol) present and soil meets NTCHS definition of hydric soil; parameter is met.
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. DeBerry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. "�hb Sampling Point: DP -9
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Absolute Dom. Indicator
30' radius ) % Cover Sp? Status*
Dominance Test Worksheet:
# Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: (A)
# Dominants across all strata: (B)
Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: (A/B)
2.
3.
4.
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply By:
OBL x 1 =
= Total Cover
30' radius )
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1$' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Dominance Test is > 50%
Prevalence Index is <= 3.0
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (explain)
X Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Morphological Adaptations
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic.
7.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10' radius )
1. Arundinaria tecta
38
2. Juncus effusus
38
3. Eutrochium dubium
1$
4. Persicaria sagittata
35
5. Eupatorium perfoliatum
SS
6. Rhexia mariana
15
7. Ludwigia palustris
35
8. Persicaria hydropiperoides
3
9. Leersia oryzoides
3
10.
11.
12.
woody Vines (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
1$
2.
3.
4.
5.
7 = Total Cover
Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover Present? YES
ks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Indicator 1(Rapid Test) present due to dominance of FACW or OBL species.
* Indicator status utilizes 2016 NWPL
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. DeBerry, PhD, PWS, PWD)
FACW x 2 =
FAC x 3 =
FACU X4=
UPL x5=
Sum: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
= Total
Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Dominance Test is > 50%
Prevalence Index is <= 3.0
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (explain)
X Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Morphological Adaptations
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
more in height and 3in (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
more in height and less than 3in (7.6cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20ft (1 to
6m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines,
regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than
approximately 3ft (lm) in height.
= Total Cover
X FACW
X OBL
X FACW
X OBL
X FACW
X FACW
X OBL
OBL
OBL
7 = Total Cover
Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover Present? YES
ks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Indicator 1(Rapid Test) present due to dominance of FACW or OBL species.
* Indicator status utilizes 2016 NWPL
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. DeBerry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

YI1b WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region DP -10
Project Site: TL 167/168 Trowbridge City/County: Washington Samp. Date: 9/12/2018
Applicant/Owner: Dominion Energy State: North Carolina Sampling Point: DP -10
Investigator(s): C. Senfield (PWS, PWD) & P. Bailey (WPIT) Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 0 to 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LLR T/ MLRA 153A Lat: 35.852137 Long: -76.768928 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit: Dorovan muck, frequently flooded NWI Map Unit: PSs1C
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Normal Circumstances? Yes
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sample point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? NO
Hydric Soil Present? NO Is This Sample Area Within a Wetland? NO
Wetland Hydrology Present? NO
Remarks: One or more parameters lacking. Area is not a jurisdictional wetland.
Observation point located on upland hillslope near flag WD -19.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required;
check all that apply)
Surface soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (B15)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (Bl)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (BS)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial (B7)
Red Parent Material (F21)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Field Observations:
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Scm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Surface Water Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Redox Depressions (F8)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Water Table Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? NO
Saturation Present? NO
Depth (inches):
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Sandy Redox (SS)
N/A
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Remarks: No primary or secondary indicators of wetland hydrology present; parameter is not met.
SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe tote depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(in) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type'
Loc' Texture Remarks
0-7 10YR 3/2 100
sand
sand
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix,
MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark surface (S9)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Stratified Layers (AS)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Scm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
lcm Muck (A9)
Redox Depressions (F8)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Umbric Surface (F13)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
Sandy Redox (SS)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: N/A
Hydric Soil Present? NO
Depth (inches): N/A
Remarks: No hydric soil indicators present and soil does not meet NTCHS definition of hydric soil; parameter is not met.
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. DeBerry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Vllb Sampling Point: DP -10
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
Absolute Dom. Indicator
% Cover Sp? Status*
Dominance Test Worksheet:
# Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC:
# Dominants across all strata:
% Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC:
2
4
50%
(A)
(B)
(A/B)
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
Total %Cover of:
OBL x 1=
FACW x2=
FAC 68 x3=
FACU 97 x4=
UPL x5=
Sum: 165 (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Multiply By:
204
388
592
3.59
(B)
= Total Cover
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius )
1.
109
= Total Cover
Dominance Test is> 50%
Prevalence Index is <= 3.0
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (explain)
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Morphological Adaptations
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
X FACU
2. Vitis rotundifolia
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
more in height and 3in (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
more in height and less than 3in (7.6cm) DBH.
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10' radius )
1. Eupatorium capillifolium 38 X FACU
2. Rubus pensilvanicus 38 X FAC
3. Verbesina alternifolia 35 FAC
4. Solidago altissima 15 FACU
5. Potentilla indica 3 FACU
6.
7.
8, Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20ft (1 to
9 6m)in height.
10.
11. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines,
12 regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than
approximately 3ft (lm) in height.
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
No hydrophytic vegetation indicators present; parameter is not met.
* Indicator status utilizes 2016 NWPL
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. DeBerry, PhD, PWS, PWD)
109
= Total Cover
Woody Vines (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Lonicera japonica
38
X FACU
2. Vitis rotundifolia
15
X FAC
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardlessof height.
3. Parthenocissus quinquefolia
3
FACU
4.
Hydrophytic
5.
Vegetation
56
= Total Cover
Present? NO
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
No hydrophytic vegetation indicators present; parameter is not met.
* Indicator status utilizes 2016 NWPL
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. DeBerry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

.Vhb, WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region DP -11
Project Site: TL 167/168 Trowbridge City/County: Washington Samp. Date: 9/12/2018
Applicant/Owner: Dominion Energy State: North Carolina Sampling Point: DP -11
Investigator(s): C. Senfield (PWS, PWD) & P. Bailey (WPIT) Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hi islope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 2 to 4
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LLR T/ MLRA 153A Lat: 35.851249 Long: - 76.772660 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit: Dorovan muck, frequently flooded NWI Map Unit: PSS1C
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Normal Circumstances? Yes
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
JUIV] IVIAKY Ut- FIINUIINUZ) - Aiiacn Slie map snowing Sample pOlni IOcaucins, iranseci5, ImpOrcani Teaiure5, eIC.
Hyd rophytic Vegetation Present? YES
Hydric Soil Present? YES Is This Sample Area Within a Wetland? YES
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES
Remarks: All parameters are met. Area is classified as a palustrine scrub -shrub (PSS) wetland.
Observation point located in right-of-way near flag WI -3.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Depth Matrix
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required;
check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (All
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
X High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (815)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (Bl)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial (137)
Organic Bodies (A6)
X FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Field Observations:
lcm Muck (A9)
Redox Depressions (F8)
' Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Surface Water Present? NO
Depth (inches): NA
wetland hydrology must be present,
X Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Water Table Present? YES
Depth (inches): Surface
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES
Saturation Present? YES
Depth (inches): Surface
Sandy Redox (S5)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Stripped Matrix (S6)
N/A
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks: At least one primary or two secondary indicators of wetland hydrology present; parameter is met.
SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe tot the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(in) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type'
Locz Texture Remarks
0-20 2.5Y 3/1 100
sandy loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix,
MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Stratified Layers (AS)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
lcm Muck (A9)
Redox Depressions (F8)
' Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12)
wetland hydrology must be present,
X Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Umbric Surface (F13)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: N/A
Hydric Soil Present? YES
Depth (inches): N/A
Remarks:
Indicator Al2 (Thick Dark Surface) present and soil meets NTCHS definition of hydric soil; parameter is met.
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. DeBerry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. N"% b Sampling Point: DP -11
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1.
30' radius )
Absolute
%Cover
Dom. Indicator
Sp? Status`
Dominance Test Worksheet:
# Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 8 (A)
# Dominants across all strata: 8 (B)
% Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 100% (A/B)
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
Total %Cover of: Multiply By:
OBL x 1 =
FACW x2=
FAC x3=
FACU x4=
UPL x5=
Sum: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
= Total Cover
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1. Salix nigra
15' radius )
35
= Total Cover
X OBL
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
X Dominance Test is > 50%
Prevalence Index is <= 3.0
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (explain)
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Morphological Adaptations
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
more in height and 3in (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
more in height and lessthan 3in (7.6cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20ft (1 to
6m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines,
regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than
approximately 3ft (lm) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? YES
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 15 X FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
30 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10' radius )
1. Juncus effusus 38 X OBL
2. Typha latifolia 35 X OBL
3. Impatiens capensis 35 X FACW
4. Conoclinium coelestinum 15 X FAC
5. Solidago rugosa 15 X FAC
6. Persicaria sagittata 3 OBL
7.
8.
9
10.
11.
12
101 = Total Cover
Woody Vines (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Mikania scandens 15 X FACW
2.
3.
4.
5.
15 = Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Indicator 2 (Dominance Test) present with >50•A of dominant species across all vegetation strata FAC or wetter.
. Indicator status utilizes 2016 NWPL
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. DeBerry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

`Vhb, WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region DP -12
Project Site: TL 167/168 Trowbridge City/County: Washington Samp. Date: 9/12/2018
Applicant/Owner: Dominion Energy State: North Carolina Sampling Point: DP -12
Investigator(s): C. Senfield (PWS, PWD) & P. Bailey (WPIT) Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 0 to 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LLR T/ MLRA 153A Lat: 35.851236 Long: - 76.772865 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit: Dorovan muck, frequently flooded NWI Map Unit: PSS1C
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Normal Circumstances? Yes
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sample point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? NO
Hydric Soil Present? NO Is This Sample Area Within a Wetland? NO
Wetland Hydrology Present? NO
Remarks: One or more parameters lacking. Area is not a jurisdictional wetland.
Observation point located on upland hillslope near flag WI -3.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Surface soil Cracks (86)
Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (813)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (815)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (816)
Water Marks (Bl)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (0)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial (137)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
FAC -Neutral Test (DS)
Water -Stained Leaves (89)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Field Observations:
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Surface Water Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Scm Muck (A9)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Water Table Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? NO
Saturation Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Umbric Surface (F13)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
N/A
Sandy Redox (S5)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Remarks: No primary or secondary indicators of wetland hydrology present; parameter is not met.
Stripped Matrix (S6)
SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe tot the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(in) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type'
Loc' Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3/2 100
sandy loam
71 1 YR 4/4
sandy loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix,
MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Stratified Layers (AS)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Scm Muck (A9)
Redox Depressions (F8)
' Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Umbric Surface (F13)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: N/A
Hydric Soil Present? NO
Depth (inches): N/A
Remarks: No hydric soil indicators present and soil does not meet NTCHS definition of hydric soil; parameter is not met.
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. DeBerry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.Vl lb Sampling Point: DP -12
R
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Absolute Dom. Indicator
% Cover Sp? Status* Dominance Test Worksheet:
# Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 1 (A)
# Dominants across all strata: 5 (B)
% Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 20% (A/B)
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10' radius )
1. Eupatorium capillifolium
38
2.
Solidago altissima
38
3.
Verbesina alternifolia
15
4.
Dichanthelium dichotomum
15
5.
Pinus taeda
3
6.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
more in height and 31n (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
7.
X FACU
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vines (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Vitis rotundifolia
2. Parthenocissus quinquefolia
3. Lonicera japonica
4.
5.
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply By:
OBL x 1=
FACW x2=
FAC 71 x3= 213
FACU 106 x4= 424
UPL x5=
Sum: 177 (A) 637 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.60
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Dominance Test is> 50%
Prevalence Index is <= 3.0
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (explain)
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Morphological Adaptations
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
more in height and 31n (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
= Total Cover
X FACU
X FACU
FAC I Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
FAC more in height and less than 3in (7.6cm) DBH.
109 = Total Cover
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20ft (1 to
6m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines,
regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than
approximately 3ft (1m) in height.
38 X FAC
15 X FACU Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
15 X FACU
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
68 = Total Cover Present? NO
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
No hydrophytic vegetation indicators present; parameter is not met.
* Indicator status utilizes 2016 NWPL
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. DeBerry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination — Wetland Delineation Report
Appendix C -
Photographs
Appendices
Representative Site

v 41 -01F
7-77717TRAIP
Ea"',
"uOv
it
goo q
A
qn,
dip,
v t
iolto

Representative Photographs — Wetland Delineation
TL 167/168 Trowbridge-Weyerhauser Rebuild VI
��
September 12, 2018
Photograph 3: View of DP -3 facing downstream along Welch Creek.
Photograph 4: View of DP -4, facing North. PEM wetland within the ROW.

_+ry��kf
,R "�
� a j.�e x y r >�. to ,} �'• �E e � `, .;
Tr
t �
h +Q. 4t"� � p'' ' k / i� F .• i tea' �. �4 P _ � �J,.. ,G t � �.�. ic�`� � !�y �r "4'
iw j r •y 4 ik tr Y' \` ��y { ', '(FS r `.'x`�"' 'i i �'1:. r
.�+ ;��� � x t 1� ✓ yS zk'�� I�r-"l Tit t�,."fv L;1 {.j � ,tY,�A ^"��'�\x41".- ..- d k 1. ri
xt ira
sY j�

_. �.v: � -
w �r.
�C t l �� � wk ��� �.y� '!1 M
r '"` 11 1
� .� i V _ w y ;".
e. e JF�.
M ', ,�;
> � ..
.e_a' `x. _- '� � a 'r .rte � � ._ .: ... �A ,
1�`
.A; f
t..' — �"
� 5
+0.y} K M k \ �
r
`� i
,. ._

K
Ow
r -=
'� f .r�aT',"•' ! .' _ •fig. ., i_ t t
w
Rr . � t ��" � ���. (•� ` � 4"•fir"� �7^ ,� �' ��� �r � R����'i�''_
MIR, il

Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination — Wetland Delineation Report
Appendix D - USACE Jurisdictional
Determination Request Form
Appendices

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers,
Wilmington DisWd
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.armv.mil/Missions/Re ug l�rvPermitProgram/Contact/CounlyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: 910-251-4633
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Ken Trowbridge Road, Jameston NC
City, State:
Plymouth, NC
County: Martin and Washington
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): Martin(0101323); Wash ington(6757837025; 66
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Dominion Energy attn: Carl J Lindemann, Jr.
Mailing Address: 10900 Nuckols Road, 4th Flor
Glen Allen, Virginia 23060
Telephone Number: 804-771-6408
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
F] I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
ZOther, please explain. Dominion Energy North Carolina holds a permanent
easement on the property. Advanced notice to Domtar is required for safety.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION'
Name: Domtar Paper Company LLC attn: Mr. Kenny Boswell
Mailing Address: PO Box 747
Plymouth, NC 27962
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION 3.4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Carl J Lindemann, Jr
Print Name
Capacity: ❑✓ Owner ❑ Authorized Agents
A'AIlk-
Date
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
rocess.
ZI intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
HA Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
3 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑✓ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
F1I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
F] I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 33.6 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

H.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
Longitude
35.85849068
-76.76937597
aA legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug l�ry-Permit-
Program/Juri sdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
✓❑ Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
Vicinity Map
FVI Aerial Photograph
F4 USGS Topographic Map
VSoil Survey Map
OOther Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
0 Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
7 www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/re ug latory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
8 Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information isvoluntary; however, if information i s not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination — Wetland Delineation Report
Appendix E - Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination Form
Appendices

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 9/28/2018
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Dominion Energy
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Washington Field Office
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: NA City: Plymouth
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.85849068 Long.: -76.76937597
Universal Transverse Mercator: NA
Name of nearest waterbody: Welch Creek and Roanoke River
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑- Field Determination. Date(s): TBD
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
PEM
35.85226167
-76.76915033
12.36 ac
Wetland
Section 404
PSS
35.85123613
-76.77286519
55.39 ac
Wetland
Section 404
PFO
35.8579615
-76.76851371
3.12 ac
Wetland
Section 404
R2
35.861875
-76.769142
272 If
Non -wetland waters
Section 10/404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
■❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑■ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1 "=2000', Plymouth West
❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Web Soil Survey (2018)
❑■ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS (2018)
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
EJ
■❑
100 -year Floodplain Elevation is:
Photographs: ❑■ Aerial (Name & Date): 2016
.(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
or Fol Other (Name & Date): September 12, 2018
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

ATTACHMENT D
Threatened & Endangered Species Information
Trowbridge — Weyerhaeuser Transmission Lines
Applicant: Dominion Energy North Carolina
Agent: C2 Environmental, Inc.

Species Conclusions Table
Project Name: Trowbridge — Weyerhaeuser Transmission Lines
Applicant: Dominion Energy North Carolina
Agent: C2 Environmental, Inc.
Date: October 24, 2018
Species / Resource Name
Conclusion
ESA Section 7 / Eagle Act
Notes / Documentation
Determination
Northern Long-eared Bat
Potential habitat present and no current
May affect
Relying upon the findings of the 1/5/2016
(Myotic septentrionalis)
survey conducted. No documented maternity
Programmatic Biological Opinion for Final 4(d) Rule
Status: FT, ST
roost or hibernaculum.
on the Northern Long -Eared Bat and Activities
Source: IPaC
Excepted from Take Prohibitions to fulfill project -
specific section 7 responsibilities.
The proposed project is located in Counties where
the species is known to be present. The work is
proposed within existing cleared, transmission line
right-of-way. Selective tree removal and trimming
will be conducted for construction access at select
locations. Tree clearing and trimming is not
expected to be of substantial acreage.
Atlantic Sturgeon
Species present, suitable habitat present
May affect, not likely to
Welch Creek is identified as anadromous fish use
(Acipenser oxyrinchus
adversely affect
area; however, no in -stream work is proposed and
oxyrinchus)
erosion and sediment controls will be used during
Status: FE, SE
construction as appropriate.
Source: NHP
American Alligator
Suitable habitat present
May affect, not likely to
The project is to take place within existing,
(Alligator mississippiensis)
adversely affect
maintained transmission line right-of-way. Based
Status: FT (S/A), ST
upon the scope of work, no impact to this species or
Source: IPaC
its habitat are expected.
Red Knot
No suitable habitat present
NatureServe Explorer Habitat Comments: This
(Calidris canutus rufa)
species uses different habitats for breeding,
Status: FT
wintering, and migration. Breeding habitats are
Source: IPaC
elevated and sparsely vegetated ridges or slopes.
They are often adjacent to wetlands and lake edges
for feeding. Wintering and migration habitats are
Page I of 2

Page 2 of 2
often muddy or sandy coastal areas, such as the
mouths of bays and estuaries, and tidal flats.
Red -cockaded Woodpecker
No suitable habitat present
May affect, not likely to
The project is to take place within existing,
(Picoides borealis)
adversely affect
maintained transmission line right-of-way. No tree
clearing or blasting is proposed. Based upon the
Status: FE, SE
scope of work, no impact to this species or its
Source: IPaC
habitat are expected.
Red Wolf
Species present, suitable habitat present
May affect, not likely to
The project is to take place within existing,
(Canis rufus)
adversely affect
maintained transmission line right-of-way. Based
Status: Exp
upon the scope of work, no impact to this species or
Source: IPac, NHP
its habitat are expected.
Critical Habitat
No critical habitat present.
No effect
Bald Eagle
Unlikely to disturb nesting bald eagles.
No Eagle Act permit required
No nests within 660 feet and not within a
(Haliaeetus leucocephalus)
Does not intersect with an eagle
concentration area
concentration area.
Page 2 of 2

hall A N Y! 1Y111
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To: August 27, 2018
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2018-SLI- 12 10
Event Code: 04EN2000-2018-E-02465
Project Name: Trowbridge - Weyerhaeuser Transmission Line
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 etseq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

08/27/2018 Event Code: 04EN2000-2018-E-02465
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and hqp://www.fws. og v/mi rg atoiybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/
comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.mnfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].

08/27/2018 Event Code: 04EN2000-2018-E-02465
Attachment(s):
Official Species List

08/27/2018 Event Code: 04EN2000-2018-E-02465
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

08/27/2018 Event Code: 04EN2000-2018-E-02465 2
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2018-SLI-1210
Event Code: 04EN2000-2018-E-02465
Project Name: Trowbridge - Weyerhaeuser Transmission Line
Project Type: FILL
Project Description: The project consists of partially rebuilding approximately 1 -mile of
existing overhead transmission line between the Trowbridge Substation in
the town of Plymouth, Washington County, NC and the Weyerhaeuser
Substation in Martin County.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.izoo2le.com/maps/place/35.8566220683403N76.76885604858398W
I
Counties: Martin, NC I Washington, NC

08/27/2018 Event Code: 04EN2000-2018-E-02465 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 5 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Mammals
NAME STATUS
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: htips:Hecos.fws. o� v/ecp/species/9045
Red Wolf Canis rufus Experimental
Population: U.S.A. (portions of NC and TN) Population,
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Non -
Species profile: haps://ecos.fws. og v/ecp/species/37 Essential
Birds
NAME STATUS
Red Knot Calidris canutus rufa Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: htips:Hecos.Fws.gov/ecp/sl2ecies/1 864
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: htips:Hecos.fwsgov/ecp/species/7614

08/27/2018 Event Code: 04EN2000-2018-E-02465
Reptiles
NAME STATUS
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis Similarity of
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Appearance
Species profile: htTs://ecos.fws.gov/ecl2/sl2ecies/776 (Threatened)
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.
4

Natural Heritage Program- Data Explorer
Search Results: 8/21/2018
TAXONOMIC
STATE
FEDERAL
COUNTY
GROUP
SCIENTIFIC_NAME
COMMON—NAME
STATUS
STATUS
14ABITAT_COMMENT
COUNTY
STATUS
brackish water of large rivers and estuaries; spawns in freshwater
Freshwater Fish
Acipenser brevirostrum
Shortnose Sturgeon
E
E
areas
Washington
Current
Acipenser oxyrinchus
Martin,
Freshwater Fish
oxyrinchus
Atlantic Sturgeon
E
E
Washington
Current
Reptile
Alligator mississippiensis
American Alligator
T
I T(S/A)
fresh to slightly brackish lakes, ponds, rivers, and marshes
Washington
Current
Mammal
Canis rufus
Red Wolf
SR
JEXP
swamps, pocosins, extensive forests
Washington
Current
mature forests near large bodies of water (nesting); rivers, lakes,
Martin,
Bird
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Bald Eagle
T
BGPA
and sounds (foraging) [breeding evidence only]
Washington
Current
Northern Long-eared
roosts in hollow trees and buildings (warmer months), in caves
Martin,
Mammal
Myotis septentrionalis
Bat
T
T -4(d)
and mines (winter); mainly in the mountains
Washington
Current
Red -cockaded
mature open pine forests, mainly in longleaf pine [breeding
Bird
Picoides borealis
Woodpecker IE
IE
evidence only] I
Washington
Current
Tn.tvbndgc Weyerhae , Transmission Line,
Applicant'. Dominion Rng— North C -lana
Agent L Cl En, i -omental, Inc

ATTACHMENT E
Cultural & Historic Resources Information
Trowbridge — Weyerhaeuser Transmission Lines
Applicant: Dominion Energy North Carolina
Agent: C2 Environmental, Inc.

Trowbridge -Weyerhaeuser Transmission Line
August 21, 2018
NR Points
NR Individual Listing
NR Listing, Gone
* NRHD Center Point
NR Boundaries
❑ National Register Boundary
❑ Boundary of Destroyed/Removed NR Listing
SL Points
SL Individual Entry
SL and DOE entry
0 Study List Entry, Gone
SL and DOE, Gone
* SLHD Center Point
1:14,651
0 0.15 0.3
0 0.25 0.5
USDA FSA, GeoEye, CNES/Airbus DS
0.6 mi
Ikm

NC Historic Preservation Office Web GIS Service
Search Results: 8/21/2018
Site ID
Status
Site Name
WH0011
SL
former) National Handle Company Plant
WH0045
SLHD
Plymouth Countty Club Estates Historic District
WH0046
SA
Little Richwood Development
WH0042
so
Walter Ellis Bateman House
WH0041
SD
William Joseph Belcher House (Gone)
Trowbridge -Weyerhaeuser Transmission Lines
Applicant Dominion Energy North Carolina
Agent C2 Environmental, Inc.