20061363 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20060803

.N•
BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC.
: W E 3081) W Millbrook Road, Suite 200 - Raleigh, North Carolina 27009
Telephone [phone] - Fax [phone]
l? 1 !•l? 2 0 0 6 1 3 6 8
AUG 2 2 2006
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
DENR - V1',Il ER QUALITY i ?^
WETLM'C l,''0 STOFMV ATER SPAJ,'Ctl S? 0 f
To: Mr. Thomas Brown Date: August 17, 2006
US Army Corps of Engineers Project #: 60040
6508 Falls of Neuse Road. Suite 120
Raleit?h. North Carolina 27615
RE: Vintage Point Subdivision
We are sending the following items attached to this transmittal:
Copies Date Description
1 8/17/06 PCN Application
Remarks: The USACE has not conducted a field evaluation for the wetland delineation
provided in the PCN application. Please let me know if you feel that a site visit is necessary.
Signed: Jennifer Burdette IJI,? c: NC Division of Water Quality (2 conies)
Mr. Douglas Ball - Dev. by the Numbers
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
n61363
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 2 0
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
tv ?..:? 1
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information R I-P. 0 W 10-R-i
D
1. Owner/Applicant Information AUG 2 2 2006
Name:_ Development by the Numbers CENR - WATER 0i IGi irv
Mailing Address: 1401 Aversboro Road, Suite 206 "UJ?L-?&Nj STRi RATER bFV„ycii
Garner, North Carolina 27529
Attn: Mr. Douglas Ball, Proiect Manager
Telephone Number: 919/427-2592 Fax Number: 919/772-3437
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jennifer A. Burdette
Company Affiliation: Burdette Land Consulting, Inc.
Mailing Address: 308D W Millbrook Road, Suite 200
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Telephone Number: 919/841-9977 Fax Number: 919/841-9909
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 1 of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Vintage Point Subdivision
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0636-84-7746
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Duncan
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Vintage Point
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): The site is located on the
west side of Buckhorn Duncan Road (SR 1119) approximately 900 feet south of Burt Road
(SR 1122) west of Fuquay-Varina, Wake County, North Carolina. Figure 1 depicts the
location of the property on the US Geological Survey (USGS) Fuquay-Varina, NC 7.5-
minute quadrangle topographic map.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.5764233 ON 78.8695009 °W
6. Property size (acres): 29
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT to Buckhorn Creek
8. River Basin: Cape Fear
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/snaps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: It consists primarily of forest land with an agricultural field
urda«d 11/1/2005
Page 2 of 9
along Buckhorn Duncan Road. Agricultural and rural residential land are the general land
uses in the vicinity of the site.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
project consists of construction of roads sufficient to provide access to proposed lots. Road
"A" crosses a stream channel, which requires installation of a culvert. Heavy equipment
typical for excavating and road grading will be used to construct the project.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purposed of the proposed work is to
develop the infrastructure necessary to provide lots for residential housing.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. Jennifer Burdette of Burdette Land Consulting, Inc. delineated the
surface waters and wetlands on the subject property on May 6, 2006. Upland and wetland data
forms and Figure 2 are attached in support of the wetland delineation. Figure 2 provides the
location of the site on the applicable Wake County Soil Survey may. Two wetlands were
flagged primarily within areas designated as open space on the Surface Waters and Wetlands
Sketch Map attached as Figure 3.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
This application covers the entire project; therefore, future permit requests are not anticipated.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 3 of 9
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The applicant proposes to
install a single culvert and an associated rip rap dissapator pad in a stream channel to
construct proposed road "A." The Surface Waters and Wetlands Impact Map provided as
Figure 4 shows the proposed crossing.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
I00-year
Floodplain
( es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
NA

Total Wetland Impact (acres) NA
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: < 0.5
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multi 1 length X width, then divide b 43,560.
Stream Impact
Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on ma) Before Impact (linear fee[) (acres)
1 UT to Buckhorn culvert/riprap intermittent 4 120 0.011

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 120 0.011
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number

(indicate on ma) Name Waterbody

plicabblle)
(if applicable) e)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of

Impact
(acres)
NA

Total Open Water Impact (acres) NA
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 4 of 9
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 120
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.011
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 120
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The applicant retained
Burdette Land Consulting, Inc. to delineate surface waters and wetlands on the subject property
during the preliminary design stages of the project to avoid impacts to the maximum extent
practicable. Since a stream channel separates portions of high ground on the property from
Buckhorn-Duncan Road, the proposed crossing is unavoidable However, the crossing was
located to avoid impacts to Jurisdictional wetlands. The project engineer Mr. Keith M Roberts
P.E. of Development Consulting Services designed the road to cross perpendicularly and utilized
a headwall to minimize the impact to the stream channel.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 9
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands/strinp,ide.htmi.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or snap, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The applicant avoided impacts to streams and wetlands where possible and minimized
stream channel impacts that were unavoidable to the maximum extent practicable. A 50-
foot-wide riparian buffer will be maintained around stream channels present within the
development in accordance with Wake County's requirements and will serve as a permanent
vegetative buffer to the stream channels. BLC believes that stream channel mitigation should
not be required for the roiect since the applicant has avoided and minimized impacts to
wetlands and stream channels to the maximum extent practicable and the proposed stream
channel impact of 120 linear feet is well below the 150 linear foot threshold established for
written approval and/or mitigation by the NCDWO and the USACE in most cases.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 9
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.eiir.state.nc.us/wrp/index.lltln. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 9
Zone* Impact
(square feet)
Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 NA 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 NA 1.5
Total NA
Zone I extends out 3U feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. NA
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. The site is currently wooded without impervious
acreage. Wake County limits the amount of impervious acreage on the project to 15 % of the
total acreage.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Individual on-site septic systems approved by Wake County will be utilized to treat wastewater
generated from the proposed project.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 9
http://h2o.enr.state. nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: The
proposed infrastructure serves only tile proposed residential subdivision; therefore, it is not
anticipated to result in additional development.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
er
Y//
Ap cant/ ent' Signature 13ate/
(Agent's sit-nature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 9

IV,
? `? ?? ???..)/ tom` ?~,/ ???. 1 ? `?? a ?`I •?t/^\l'?
_-??? ????/// \y \`. r. \??`% ? ??-T ''. 750 ?\\`M1? ?.• ?`?.. ' .- ? I( ?- \ aJ??.

?i? ?' ?`? ?-,%'?` 1. ? ?, ? ? it ?? ??,•/f?, ' ,,

1119
?
?? It
?
?(
• ? - -----.
-. ?-
.
f?1 ? . v---? •- - X50 'r ? --n i
`

- ? 9 111
. '• ..... ?rI!. t" ... ? Via,
IFF
(• ( v
.:? i,\ ?? j ?? / ? C .?..
.
?( ?
? ? ?, hed?o`. ,
??M 11? - ?• • Du •can ??,
40
? ?? •. // E • ? • /I, J;-t?: ? ?'? 14121 ? li
i ?: .
1 ? 7
11,
• •
. J ?
._
rZ
f r
,
?
???•, ._r
'
?
"
? -..
-
?- - ,
{
rte i?

GRAPHIC SCALE
• = 2000'
2000' oRp?tli `? USGS LOCATION MAP
kINTAGE POINT SUBDIVISION
2 2006 N
BALL DEVELOPMENT
TER QUALI IY WAKE COUNTY, NC

••N••
•• •• DATE: 05/03/06 USGS 7.5' TOPO QUAD:
FUQUAY-VARINA
• BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC. DRAWN BY: TMB
• W E 308D W Millbrook Road, Suite 200 -Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 CHK'D BY: JAB
S Telephone [phone]- Fax [phone] PROJECT #: 60040 FIGURE #: I
7-7
I t C' /? x ?r ?4 4' !,+ kt II A APB2
i •?b I ? 1 3 `' _ t .. ta,
h
r? r tt •?? i j$ 'ri r t?,n f 1 .ti'?? +' ?`?t + _t•, w ? 3 ? ,
? Y / {14,11 1 `11?? II _'
t.? +'`..a}Oel 1.61,1
c { / ?g .3 + d r} ? Y + {.?? _} ? 1 I ? t ar?,- s ?'j 1
yJ '•l NoB2 ? f
a w JC'
.+:s ..?» St. .r.,, ,;F.s •/°' ?'} yt+s # f .lt r i v'.-
rt •? Z,'?,, h ? :?4);? ?r? l'a? 1 t ? (tel.} I r,11 ?! ?j ?? +?. ? ?I y _ A 1. A,'? ?' ?!..
+ ' t . t ? ? ? t J 9 r a I1 1 lti}+ z }{{a ry. t?. i /
J -,1 r ?. i t 1 ,? a
r
J
i r. rt ?/?, } ? ?? j . ? ti tr 1 ?^' ? r '• <y 4 ;\ ,. ? ? ?? (' 1 d ? tl r' ??-" ti?a
1 !\/ ?w tr
r »? i s 1 x No B2 e 1
AL ©„
9 t, S. WaD ! {`
? s a? 1 ? ?? ?•'?,r?? v ?._', 1 ,Lr ?61 r r ?'a: r ?g ' ° Wa .r a?f: •? (
4 y
Ir ?i,A? ? ,-t ll r ? tlr? ??> ? rr• J1+rnry s i n 1 t A{I( t?u t • 11 /??O it .?,.
r1 t / ry } 3 , l..i i o.tYri117 ?, t+ r }t II ,,?U
+ !+ + tt?_ r,-`/ AgC2 APD'.
`''? J? ? r "'yyyyyy %
r aE3? II 4 It w ?'1 r r4'. aC
{ ) s
yhr a WaC by". WaC
Jl s y
ti rs y r { ' r. ?'? APB2 li e.
.(gel;, a l dtE? } a +wt {, • II ?WaC
.. SITE ,r? ii L ?A T t-w?A.
f WgA WaC Wt A r t t.
CgB2 '? iC ia;"? s tr ^ PQ AgC2t C_.r M.:., ?• ^
Wa8 ~
i t r ! ;; H t C
AP WaC
?r- .? CkC? 1{ 1•Wm? ly f •? i T_`. ?,'_ ??. t
AItLr
CeD Wa© WaC ?` Vat
??1? ? •.?,?, ? " , '! 1 ?bC??= a AgC2 ?' rl ?,/)? NoB2
A? } 1 APC2
e?c
Ag82 11 1 ' 'y 0 l 'rJ. u AgC2 { \AP(t
APB.
+ i'r- i FA?C,?? y'Y ' t' 't, ?... r V --•?_ ? \ G E ? ?, t ? f (1
({ 0? PQ AgB1
?f ^? APB2 IAKl37 IQ " ??. r _ v'? n{+r f vYaC
WAES ? ?Ag , y t ?, i ? pp.. .? r?? {: r!ry.•
aEi ter ?j.
13
(-,WgA
Uci:R WATER Q1J;-jT
rrly i f R;?f+GFI ~. ? .K. ~
1NETW,G-1 Fu ,'D STCn
hT ''
.., 1
GRAPHIC SCALE WAKE COUNTY SOIL SURVEY MAP N
1" =1320"
1320' 0 1320' VINTAGE POINT SUBDIVISION
RUN P?j ,= - BALL DEVELOPMENT
WAKE COUNTY, NC
••••N DATE: 05-03-06 S11EET(S): 96 & 101
.•w E BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC. AND CONSULTING, INCDRAWN BY: TMB C11K'D BY: JAB
308-D W Millbrook Road, Suite 200 -Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Telephone [phone]- Fax [phone] PROJECT #: 60040 FIGURE #: 2
S
N
- -------- - ?_ i9i ---- --- ---- --?'--_-- - -------
v?? - ?\----- - -----=_--- --
O ? 1Tf _
.I I _ _ _tsn _ tai \ 3 J % /
? ? - - --L ?, _ - _ ? Rio A"-50 R Fuytit; 10? PMT" - ? o , I ? 7=?
_ ?Q
/ ti i /
1 ? to '? /
.? 5' ADDITIONAL R/W
WILL BE DEDICATED.
/
t EXiSTiNG /
TREE LINE //
/
/
/
J /
/
/
/
/
0
a
O
@[7M
L1
AUG 2 9 2006
?cNR. trl,^?r
/ ?? p 3 . + / 1 ?? ?R5 / / Qo / EXISTING HARNETT
s= % / / `? l r O? / / `? 17 . / I bq, r / I ?? 26 ?o COUNTY 8- WATERLINE
/ / /
1 * / / ! v
°I 21'' / t9s // //?? / / o
I? ? / / //' ,? / „? / `? ? ? of ?/?QO ,e 1! % _
\ 1
14\/`? / // O d1 69 O II
?\ \\ \ \y? t5 18/// ,?/ O II I
/-?-?-\ - / 101 /_? //, / /24 1, j

1
I
I
GRAPHIC SCALE
1"=160'
160' 0 160' 320'
? S
414.2 J
I
i
i
,1° ti's ?j ??

I?
I I
1 I
5 ADDITIONAL R/W DEDICATION
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE
MADE AS REQUIRED BY NCDOT.
w e BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC.
308-D W Millbrook Road, Suite 200 • Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
•9977- Fax [phone]
LEGEND
-'' . - JURISDICTIONAL STREAM CHANNELS
77 JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
A
H DRAINAGEDESIGNAIIONS
ft CENTERLINE
TT TIE TO
NOTES:
1.) THE DESIGNATION AND LIMITS OF THESE FEATURES MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE US
ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
2.) THE LOCATIONS OF THESE FEATURES ARE APPROXIMATE AND DEPICTED HERE TO
FACILITATE SURVEYING. THIS MAP DOES NOT REPRESENT A SURVEY OF
JURISDICTIONAL 1 ISOLATED WATERS OF THE US.
3.) STREAM CHANNELS WITH A CLEAR BED AND BANK WERE NOT FLAGGED.
SURVEYORS NEED TO LOCATE THE CENTER LINE OF THESE STREAM CHANNELS
AT EACH BEND OR MEANDER AND NOTE THE WIDTH OF THE CHANNEL AT EACH
POINT.
DATE: 06
SURFACE WATERS AND WETLANDS SKETCH MAP '
'
=160
SCALE: T =160
VINTAGE POINT SUBDIVISION DRAWN BY: TMB
DEVELOPMENT BY THE NUMBERS CHKD BY: JAB
FUQUAY-VARINA, WAKE COUNTY, NC ?ra?T?- a 6r?ao
AGRICULTURAL FARM
?JA6b:Vne
20' TREE AND ZONING: R-40 RESIDENCE-< 10eANoCRES-F VlE SITE/ N
?C>>/
VEGETATION PROTECTION 30' PERNETM ZCN'NO: R i /
ZaIE I /• BUILDING
5' ADDITIONAL R
752' SETBACK
r?t3V -- ?---- 1 - _ - - _ _
------ - •'? e? ,ss' _ _ _ _ _ _ WILL BE DEDICATED.
?I---- --- - - - - - e? t Z?'_'---
6 7 30' PERINETER i \ 1 +s 2 w OS
sEiaaac I 2>r 2100 O
I 450003 1 ?, - - - Iss. ,47--97
N/ 312
/ \ // _ . - _C??" r / EXTSTiNG
f/
9/ \ it ?184.Y ?TREE LINE
/
TREE AND
??
'ROTECTION
401753
ZONE OPEN SPACE /' d? /n• Y \\? ?¢/ /? (tl
2.39 AC//
ED PAGE: 0210 e?,/ y 27 / //// I(??/7
62311 II00 \? r
i? U V
-FARM 1-11 1' RPARIA\1 OPEN SPACE //+? ry/ S?? 236703 k no
80 2.5 AC r
I lei'
273x3 AUG 2 2 2006
Z,
• S?
UErIR • "'TER
C ;-T
142X7 26 IVETWI3A%DST
12
137 257597
/I 258 43 ^I / n4. 13 I J I RPARIAN BUFFER I ,as'
ET i
205
21ui / J? BO Y 22'0533 I ?II
75aFSr \ 3 I / ?i / / . I Y I I m II
// \ 15 16 / _ / 58 / 23 Y 24 I II ??
2456432:563 j• ; a I ^ 11 1
30' PSUETER - ? ' - •} 1 275 A - ----- - I II 1`
MAEC/O GREGORY HCBBY BUILDING /
502,0 DEED PAGE: 0436 SETBACK 11 1 45' ACCESS L - - = _ -_ _ e II i
0 \ ,?
C636830437 60IROAjN? Ya
R'?CULTURAL-FARM SEAGRD'lEB, THOMAS J JR DEED 20' TREE AND EASEMENT ? ?
BOOK: 04600 DEED PAGE: 0620 VEGETATION PROTECTION
ING: R-60 BURT, FRED W & S'-iIRL EY C li E AS
PIN p:06368<6270 ZONE GEED BOCK: 05817 DEED PAGE: CE98 /
Sirgle Fcrrdy
er,m_uc PIN B, 0636942167 11 ?
NOTES:
1.) 120 LF OF STREAM CHANNEL IMPACT
2.) BASE MAP AND STREAM CROSSING INFORMATION PROVIDED BY DEVELOPMENT
CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.
1" = 40'
C, -
GRAPHIC SCALE
' '• p••'•.,
S DATE: 08/16/06
V =160 URFACE WATERS & WETLANDS IMPACT MAP SCAT
F
I= 160'
% BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING
INC. VINTAGE POINT SUBDIVISION .
,

160' 0 160' 320'
: W E , DRAWN BY: TMB
_ ;• 308-D W Millbrook Road, Suite 200 -Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 DEVELOPMENT BY THE NUMBERS CFDCD BY: ]AB
5
•: Telephone [phone]-Fax [phone] FUQUAY-VARINA
WAKE COUNTY
NC PROJECT #: 60040
•
,,, ,
,

1 FIGURE #: 4
1
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Vintage Point Subdivision
Applicant / Owner: Development by the Numbers
Investigator: Jennifer Burdette Date: 5/6/06
County: Wake
State: NC

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X
(explain on reverse if needed) Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID:WL@Flg#121
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Sm r_inc Stratum Indic-tor Dcralnrnt Plant 3^ cir3 Stratums Indicator
1. Liriodendron tulipifera Tree FAC 9. Lonicera japonica Herb FAC-
2. Liriodendron tulipifera Shr/San FAC 10.
3. /tea virginica FACW+ 11.
4. Vaccinium staminennt FACU 12.
5. Smilax rotundifolia Vine FAC 13.
6. Enlalia viminea Herb FAC+ 14.
7. Athyrium thelypteriodes FAC 15.
8. Arisaema triphylhym FACW- 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 78
Remarks: More than 50% of the dominant species are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC- indicating that the
hydrophytic vegetation criterion is met.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
- Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
- Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other - Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12"
X No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Secondary Indicators:

Depth to Free Water in Pit: NA (in.) Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 6 (in.) x FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The presence of primary and secondary indicators at this location confirms that the wetland hydrology
criterion is met.
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Vinta£e Point Subdivision
Applicant / Owner:_ Development by the Numbers
Investigator: Jennifer Burdette Date: 5/6/06
County: Wake
State: NC

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X
(explain on reverse if needed) Transect ID:
Plot ID:UP@Flg#121
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Spcclos Stratus Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Liriodendron trdipifera Tree FAC 9. Lonicera japonica Herb FAQ-
2. Primus serotina FACU 10. Stellaria media FACU
3. A/n« s serrulata FACW+ 11. Phytolacca americans FACU+
4. Liriodendron rulipifera Shr/Sao FAC 12._Rubus beadifolius FAC
5. Prunus serotina FACU 13.
6. Ahnus serrulata Vine FAC 14.
7. Vitus rotundifolia FAC 15.
8. Eulalia viminea Herb FAC+ 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 67
Remarks: More than 50% of the dominant species are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC- indicating that the
hydrophytic vegetation criterion is met.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12"
X No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: - Sediment Deposits
- Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Secondary Indicators:

Depth to Free Water in Pit: NA (in
) Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
. Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 14 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The absence of primary and secondary indicators at this location confirms that the wetland hydrology
criterion is not met.
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase):_ Appling sandy loam, 10 to 15% slopes Drainage Class: well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): T is Ha ludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottlo Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) ( Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-4 Al IOYR 3/2 NA NA fine sandy loam
4-8 A2 I OYR 3/2 NA NA sandy loam
8-18 E 10YR 511 NA NA loamy sand
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The presence of low chroma colors confirms that the hydric soils criterion is met.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Within a Wetland? Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: This location meets the criteria for a jurisdictional wetland based on the presence of hydrophytic
vegetation, wetland hydrology, and hydric soils.
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Applin,g sandy loam, 10 to 15% slopes Drainage Class: well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munseli Moist) ( Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-2 A 10YR 4/3 NA NA loamy sand
2-16 B IOYR 411 NA NA sandy clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The presence of low chroma colors confirms that the hydric soils criterion is met.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Within a Wetland? Yes_ No X
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: This location does not meet the criteria for a jurisdictional wetland based on the absence of wetland
hydrology.
Received 08 14 2006 08:29
Aug. W 2006 6:25AM
No, 6542 P- 1
3030 5V 41416mok Rtmd, Suilc 200 - Ralnl3h, Naith Cari lum'27(0)
+ .11 1 .
I depho m: [phone] -•• Fax V) 19) M 1-9909
8
e1.GENr AUTHORIZATION FOIt1Vf
US Army Corpx of ngincCm
Ralc igb Regulatory Field Oflicca
6508 Falls o1'Ncuse Road, Suite 120
1talril lr, North Currhna 27615
Notib CaroUna Division of Water Quality
Central Office
Mail Service Center 1650
Kialcigh, Nuiih Carl: iIhja 27690
To Whorn It May Concct-a:
By signing below., flat: current properly c weer gives it prescntntives of.Burdette band
C:aiisultin , lac:. pcrta1i6S.iori to cut as their nuthoriml agent for jurisdictional and isolated waicis
cord .ripsarian burfer determtinations, delineation, and lactrriitting for the subject prr?jiet. Thi;
mathorin ion includes permission to enter the situ to conduct site nwirip with US Army Corps
oil Engincerr, and NC: Division of Water Quality pcrsutwcl, -as ncccssiny.
Project Nantlc: triartll+ra I'oialt 541 S?{Yin tC'13
13I..t?::Eit•,jc?:t 11; r lr 1_.._._.
Curtrnt I'r operty Owner. or Eascnaenl flo:ldor.
(include contact person if u corlroradvt4 parmersliip, or goverrrrt em) _____ ,. ,_,w•_?,... .w..? .'...
iVlailing.Addrets: .1401 RVE+Q4&gp RmL _ .Sgire 20(e
I`cicptaorrc,: ? 19? 9 27- 259 Z _ _.,. ??. F'LC Z7 -11., - _-
Sign lite ? Pru)Naive (hicltade title f f up r priate?
.._...._IFFF r.. _
Date
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Vintage Point Subdivision Date: 5/6/06
Applicant / Owner: Development by the Numbers County: Wake
Investigator: Jennifer Burdctte State: NC

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X Plot ID:WL@Flg#121
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Snecies Rtrntiom
- Indic-mor Dcminnnt Plant c.. clcr ?._.
-ratum indicator
1.Liriodendron tulipifera Tree FAC 9. Lonicera japonica Herb FAQ-
2. Liriodendron tulipifera Shr/San FAC 10.
3. _ Itea virginica FACW+ 11.
4. Vaccinium stamineum FACU 12.
5. Smilax rotundifolia Vine FAC 13.
6. Eulalia viminea Herb FAC+ 14.
7. Athvrium thelypteriodes FAC 15.
8. Arisaema triphyllunt FACW- 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 78
Remarks: More than 50% of the dominant species are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC- indicating that the
hydrophytic vegetation criterion is met.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12"
X No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Secondary Indicators:

Depth to Free Water in Pit: NA (in.) Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 6 (in.) x FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The presence of primary and secondary indicators at this location confirms that the wetland hydrology
criterion is met.
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Appling sandy loam, 10 to 1517o slopes Drainage Class: well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) ( Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-4 Al IOYR 3/2 NA NA fine sandy loam
4-8 A2 I OYR 3/2 NA NA sandy loam
8-18 E IOYR 511 NA NA loamy sand
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The presence of low chroma colors confirms that the hydric soils criterion is met.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Within a Wetland? Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: This location meets the criteria for a jurisdictional wetland based on the presence of hydrophytic
vegetation, wetland hydrology, and hydric soils.
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Vintap-c Point Subdivision
Applicant / Owner: Development by the Numbers
Investigator: Jennifer Burdette Date: 5/6/06
County: Wake
State: NC

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X
(explain on reverse if needed) Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID:UP@Flg#121
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratus Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Liriodendron tnlif ifera Tree FAC 9. Lonicera japonica Herb FAC-
2. Prunits serotina FACU 10. Stellaria media FACU
3. Alims serrulata FACW+ 11. Phytolacca arnericana FACU+
4. Liriodendrort tnlipifera Shr/San FAC 12._ Rubus betulifolius FAC
5. Prunus serotina FACU 13.
6. AInus serrrdata Vine FAC 14.
7. Vitus rotmrdifolia FAC 15.
8. Eulalia vinrinea Herb FAC+ 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 67
Remarks: More than 50% of the dominant species are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC- indicating that the
hydrophytic vegetation criterion is met.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
_ Other Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12"
X No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Secondary Indicators:

Depth to Free Water in Pit: NA (in
) Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
. _ Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 14 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The absence of primary and secondary indicators at this location confirms that the wetland hydrology
criterion is not met.
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Appling sandy loam, 10 to 15% slopes Drainage Class: well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottlo Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) ( Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-2 A I OYR 4/3 NA NA loamy sand
2-16 B IOYR 411 NA NA sandy clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The presence of low chroma colors confirms that the hydric soils criterion is met.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Within a Wetland? Yes_ No X
Hydric Soils Present? Yes XNo
Remarks: This location does not meet the criteria for a jurisdictional wetland based on the absence of wetland
hydrology.
Received 08 14 2006 08:29
Aug- W 2006 6:25AM
N o . 6 5 4 2 P- 1
+N
W E ??.....r-3031) W trtillbmuk t Emd, SuiW ZOO - Raleigh, Noith Cuoliaam'270&)
T dcpho m:- (e 19) 94 t •9977 .- FAjL 0)19) 841-9909
t3

US Army Cc)rpx of 173411ccts
Italcilr13 Regulatory Field Oflica
6508 Falls of°:Ncuse Rtmd, Suite 120
Ruleig,lr, Nortli Curtyalina 27615
Notth Carolina Division of Watcr (duality
Central Office
Mail Service Center 16501
Raleigh, Noillr Carolina 27699
'.l"o Whom it May Coneem:
By signing below., die current; properly owner; iva representatives ufBurdette I-and
Consulting, Inc.. permiss.ioll to act as their authorized agent for jurisdictional and .isolated w.alws
Emd .riparian buffer detenninativn5, delineation, and parnitting .for the s'mbject pt(rjeet. This
authorization includes permission to enter the site to conduct site ma;tinp with US Army Coi jrs
of Endinec.rs and NC: Division of Wratcr Quality lxrsurmel, as neccssm-Y.
Yr(jcct Narix. Uiattta? I', gia11?41 ??{Yi ?S'11
Currrart Property Owner; or Easeraacnt :Holder:
Mane:;
(include contact person if a corparadnrt, parmership, orgoverrunent) ......?..., ...,.?..?..w,,....
l1l?uling.l?ddrets; .1461 Val-4&,Qaa ?Pe?b ,- Stl?sr Zqg
lilel)lrcanc: 19 927-2592 l~?ce: , Z7.
Sign lite Print N;ti.m (include title, if up r pr
Tate
II
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
20061363
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing;
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
H Of?o
D
AUG2 2 2006
Name:_ Development by the Numbers
Mailing Address: 1401 Aversboro Road, Suite 206 Dt:Nk -WATER QUALITY
Garner, North Carolina 27529 `? A??? sro?,?w,?.Tr R 6Et?rdcri
Attn: Mr. Douglas Ball, Project Manager
Telephone Number: 919/427-2592 Fax Number: 919/772-3437
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jennifer A. Burdette
Company Affiliation: Burdette Land Consulting, Inc.
Mailing Address: 308D W Millbrook Road, Suite 200
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Telephone Number: 919/841-9977 Fax Number: 919/841-9909
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
updated 11/1/2005
Page 1 of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Vintage Point Subdivision
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN)
0636-84-7746
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Duncan
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Vintage Point
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): The site is located on the
west side of Buckhorn Duncan Road (SR 1119) approximately 900 feet south of Burt Road
(SR 1122) west of Fuquay-Varina, Wake County, North Carolina. Figure 1 depicts the
location of the property on the US Geological Survey (USGS) Fuquay-Varina, NC 7.5-
minute quadrangle topographic map.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.5764233 ON 78.8695009 °W
6. Property size (acres): 29
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT to Buckhorn Creek
8. River Basin: Cape Fear
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/inaps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: It consists primarily of forest land with an agricultural field
updated 11/1/2005
Page 2 of 9
along Buckhorn Duncan Road. Agricultural and rural residential land are the general land
uses in the vicinity of the site.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
project consists of construction of roads sufficient to provide access to proposed lots. Road
"A" crosses a stream channel, which requires installation of a culvert. Heavy equipment
typical for excavating and road grading will be used to construct the project.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purposed of the proposed work is to
develop the infrastructure necessary to provide lots for residential housing.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. Jennifer Burdette of Burdette Land Consulting, Inc. delineated the
surface waters and wetlands on the subject property on May 6, 2006. Upland and wetland data
forms and Figure 2 are attached in support of the wetland delineation. Figure 2 provides the
location of the site on the applicable Wake County Soil Survey map. Two wetlands were
flagged primarily within areas designated as open space on the Surface Waters and Wetlands
Sketch Map attached as Figure 3.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
This application covers the entire project, therefore, future permit requests are not anticipated.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 3 of 9
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The applicant proposes to
install a single culvert and an associated rip rap dissapator pad in a stream channel to
construct proposed road "A." The Surface Waters and Wetlands Impact Map provided as
Figure 4 shows the proposed crossing.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
( es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
NA

Total Wetland Impact (acres) NA
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: < 0.5
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
Indicate on ma
() Before Impact (linear feet) (acres)
1 UT to B kckhorn culvert/riprap intermittent 4 120 0.011

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 120 0.011
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact Name of Waterbody Type of Watcrbody Area of
Site Number
(if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on ma) ocean, etc.) (acres)
NA

Total Open Water Impact (acres) NA
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 4 of 9
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the proiect:
Stream Impact (acres): 120
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.011
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 120
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The applicant retained
Burdette Land Consulting, Inc. to delineate surface waters and wetlands on the subject property
during the preliminary design stages of the project to avoid impacts to the maximum extent
practicable. Since a stream channel separates portions of high ground on the property from
Buckhorn-Duncan Road, the proposed crossing is unavoidable However, the crossing was
located to avoid impacts to jurisdictional wetlands The project engineer Mr. Keith M Roberts
P.E. of Development Consulting Services designed the road to cross perpendicularly and utilized
a headwall to minimize the impact to the stream channel
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 9
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
littp:Hh2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetl,inds/stringide.htm1.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation casement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The applicant avoided impacts to streams and wetlands where possible and minimized
stream channel impacts that were unavoidable to the maximum extent practicable. A 50-
foot-wide riparian buffer will be maintained around stream channels present within the
development in accordance with Wake County's requirements and will serve as a permanent
ve,getative buffer to the stream channels. BLC believes that stream channel mitigation should
not be rewired for the project since the applicant has avoided and minimized impacts to
wetlands and stream channels to the maximum extent practicable and the proposed stream
channel impact of 120 linear feet is well below the 150 linear foot threshold established for
written approval and/or mitigation y the NCDWO and the USACE in most cases.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 9
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check tile NCEEP
website at littp://h2o.enr.state.tic.us/wrp/index.litm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 9
Zone* Impact
(square feet)
Multiplier Required

Mitigation
i NA 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 NA 1.5
Total NA
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. NA
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level._ The site is currently wooded without impervious
acreage. Wake County limits the amount of impervious acreage on the nroiect to 15 % of the
total acreage.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Individual on-site septic systems approved by Wake County will be utilized to treat wastewater
generated from the proposed project.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of D®Q Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes E] No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 9
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: The
proposed infrastructure serves only the proposed residential subdivision, therefore, it is not
anticipated to result in additional development.
YV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
NA

re
(Agent's sitnature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updatcd 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 9
L%

a -Vi
50

1 C
1 / `,?? l -\?' ' 1?- ? ? ? ???• ? '? ?+/ rte! ?, .? ._? ? ?,?::;?I.n

?? " ??
6
mar/ L V \ t ?•.
7
( I

N -1-p
?
1496
?? ? -----??-._ ?.
?' {? \ ?? 'e _` ?.. :. \ { 149) ' ?? ?+•?„
?-J`'?>•?J ? tom. ,.-.- ; G5, -? s - 'v a??J .
r '?` `\?.- 'i1•' ? ? :: /,ltd .+. ?? t./`."•r \
,Tr,- S067-4
J (, ?..._ ?, ' D v-•__.. ,.t?, f.? . Dti •ean X11 ;;,. t•' IN 'G ,,t` r?+° .'
AX ulil S
'
-0 Q

GRAPHIC SCALE
V = 2000'
zooo' o zooo' USGS LOCATION MAP
VINTAGE POINT SUBDIVISION
BALL DEVELOPMENT N
_ WAKE COUNTY, NC

•-N,,
•• .' DATE: 05/03/06 USGS 7.5' TOPO QUAD:
FUQUAY-VARINA
: BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING INC. DRAWN BY: TMB
• W

{
d,
i ok Road, Suite 200 -Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
CHK'D BY: JAB
. •
^? " ° - "I hone [phone]-Fax [phone] PROJECT #: 60040 FIGURE #: I

y ti ,? r t (t1 hn±-I
A
-
._
APB2
Cor
I i14'
tJIQ ( C I1 ?'. ?u ?. 3` l?_:1 ?ftkf , ?y p NoB2--
..Y a /,t.na? <r' .t ` I ?I, ?.• t aAR?2 j'Gu
?

q 1 ?? y 1 I 1 ?. 1,` '?) (j+ !9, jam. V
%
>
r 1?' ? ?(/ ! '!A t J{ x ?x? *i yam. nT G . !t
M
s • '• r ) + r o Jf
? r + P z NoB2 WaB
1 \ ciE a Cti.r a? r Wa AgB
1 1 J '1 •r- - , r?in? ?t ..r II ?' .U
' ? ? t', c? ? ABC2 1"? APD'?
1 r I ,. ^' `D11? 1 ;_? + ti _ 'x `?--'_,-! ''' i WaB\ II •-g 11 w - t LWaC
WaLr
Ai) vvaC 11
E, 1
Wac
?
1 - f
: ?, li
APB2 _
J f .
.L
deL
'
/
!
:#ti?
+
WaC
t°
l
r
,
.
`
1 ,
t _
?
c, i
?c( a
i.
r, ? ,?tTi?t:sII Wo ?,
? E .z y tiVnlf f
-?
=
,
SITE _ ?,°? r •;? ?.r_v,?,
WgA t q WaC Wr
CgB2
t !`! ^?T w."? 1 PD AgC2"
a ``t,
,I WaB
t I"?f g,
fi
x Y
A D
?C?C7? • " ?) r ?, ?t Wm ?' R_ ??1 r?? s WaC
CeD `y ( w Wa( Wa
1 A C J+' r Wo J WaB Q?
nRc? ' zzz - y„ D/ gA
? f

,+. d qfi O
?iI
A B2? K ys'` ?yy° Q ?? , ? 1?
6
< rfj fJ' yo j q ARB2 Y , V: AHC2 / A
/` ?r
PQ i Q r ?: ti
' APD Wes
5
W
? ?
( l
?
.
_
p
.
! r
.?.Ap62 e?1?s/AgB1 rQd?r ?? rPPU'AHBL ?gU2 JUC
l y ARt? 1 ?'? t ] •? ?,?? ( ,t
.,t WIE3IY •?1 All
?
IjNaB ! ohs j _ -
`
c
f r u' _ [ ? ? ? ?'Y

06 _._ '
20
?
?
2
v`
?
d
J
AUK
?
y`?•
?
?
-
??,
A
?
i
v (t i;r ??diCN y``
? Fj "' S 1
V^dETl.F3l

GRAPHIC SCALE
1" =1320" WAKE COUNTY SOIL SURVEY MAP N
'
' VINTAGE POINT SUBDIVISION
1320
0 1320

_ BALL DEVELOPMENT
WAKE COUNTY, NC
•''•N''•• DATE: 05-03-06 SHEET(S): 96 & 101

IN e BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC.
Suite 200 -Raleigh
North Carolina 27609
308-D W Millbrook Road DRAWN BY: TMB CHICD BY: JAB
,
,
Telephone [phone]- Fax [phone] PROJECT #: 60040 FIGURE #: 2
S
S
N 414.2
/
AL
I ,L_
-------'- ?_ ,?? __ Ise --
-----
?O
1 0 .b ,
III Q? 1 27l_ - -Iw
_ 0
ROAD'AA''-50 R ?0 I 1 * g
_ -ter - .- dog
4f' IT
0 /
I
-;A weZ,
II r -/
1l I

dog ?3? 41
J ?
a
0
i
5' ADDITIONAL R/W /
WILL BE DEDICATED. /
/
H4
/
DUSTING /
TREE LINE 1 20 4 / h? Ur / J
ry J0DUSTING HARNEIT
17 'B.• 1 1' ?° I DUSTING Q J / COUNTY 6' WATERLINE
/
\\ 1s 18 */1/ '? // 3? / O / 24 III,
00
------ .? hU /II--
•? 1 - - - -+ I 5' ADDITIONAL R/W DEDICATION

1
I _
/
/
I
/
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS W'LL BE
MADE AS REQUIRED BY NCDOL
r's
?A
A11G 2 a
LEGEND
- . , - JURISDICTIONAL STREAM CHANNELS
JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
A
fj DRAINAGE DE5IGNAIIUNS
CENTERLINE
TT TIE TO
NOTES:
1.) THE DESIGNATION AND LIMITS OF THESE FEATURES MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE US
ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
2.) THE LOCATIONS OF THESE FEATURES ARE APPROXIMATE AND DEPICTED HERE TO
FACILITATE SURVEYING. THIS MAP DOES NOT REPRESENT A SURVEY OF
JURISDICTIONAL I ISOLATED WATERS OF THE US.
3.) STREAM CHANNELS WITH A CLEAR BED AND BANK WERE NOT FLAGGED.
SURVEYORS NEED TO LOCATE THE CENTER LINE OF THESE STREAM CHANNELS
AT EACH BEND OR MEANDER AND NOTE THE WIDTH OF THE CHANNEL AT EACH
POINT.
GRAPHIC SCALE
1" =16°'
BURDETTE LAND CONSULTIN
SURFACE WATERS AND WETLANDS SKETCH MAP
INC. VINTAGE POINT SUBDIVISION
DEVELOPMENT BY THE NUMBERS
FUQUAY-VARINA, WAKE COUNTY, NC
AGRICULTURAL-FARM " ?''•
2o' PREE AND ZONING: R-40 ?56??e Hame / N
1EGETATIaN PROTECTICN , RESIDENCE-< 10 ACRES- MM SITE/ G
Za4E 30' PER METER ZCN'40: R-?
BUILDING ADDITION R
_\2L - __ ---- J72 - - - _ SMACK WILL BE DEDICATED. /i <'
I F - ?- - - - - _ -- at _ - - --- 18- --- ';r
?I ---0 Z2u
- - - -- - ------ ---?° - / ,??ar_ /
I? \ I +xccs sic \? 5O ) ( / y / • r 7
30'PERMETER
BUILDINGS I \ 0 \ ?; ??? 2f0IX7 %T
SETBACK
IV 40CT7
I 1 ??-`•µ?--,"d-"--? ra, _ _ ?---a= _ PF61T- ?- y?, Tr ins /' /'?
EXS7NG
TREE LINE,,-
TREE AND 272=7
'ROTECTIO
ZONE I I 471757' 1 \ /1'293787 Nor ZONE 1 / ==7
1 \ _ 10 OPEN SoACE 'i_ nog'
II \ 'O -_2.39 AC// Y 1_''nJf
4 / / \ ~ AID U
ED PAGE: C210 I I ?? L ' // a tr 01 Y 2 AUG ? r, .
62311 12
Z3i4sF / p6 / O
-FARM00' RPAMA' tR OPENS CE 'Ll/ A,
2.5 AC
I st' ?•` _ ? I QJ/ / ? .-? `,?,'/i ? / Q / ° / // -.,,4iu;T?.,G;Jp?1ry
T ?-- '? ?i 1111 233OC3 ?l / 4 11 ?o 1j,
?? .5
310/ 26 / r171
e
7 YO ZO r ' Il ri
211' 4 Jl p rP
1G0' R;PARIAN BUFFER / '2? ?' / }177 J y 11 H 8 0"AET I
/ I 14 \ ' / , / / BD, T v , 111
7592GS 233.`,17 / I Y 228;"7 rr J 11 /
?// \ \ \ I 15 16 / 55 23 YY I r 11
nl s 2727s/ 2 / -? / - 245617 -'y2 2.
JO' PER II TER ' ' r 1 433 - -------
MAEC/0 GREGORY HCBBY BUILDING /
5020 DEED PACE: 0435 SETBACK i L -
C63683J437 SEACROVES, THOMAS J JR DEED 20 iRff AND 1 11 ? ??? EASEMENTS t ?1 RO?AYp
RCULTURAL-FARM BCCd: 04600 DEED PAGE: C620 ?EGETATICN PROTECTION
ING: R-80 PIN R:0636846270 ZONE CEEDBBOOK 05811 DEED ?PAGE:C AS
C698 II/ E
Sirg,e FaTily
er,in_uc PIN # 0636942167

NOTES:
1.) 120 LF OF STREAM CHANNEL IMPACT
2.) BASE MAP AND STREAM CROSSING INFORMATION PROVIDED BY DEVELOPMENT
CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.

12 ?'? 3
1" = 40'
c'
GRAPHIC SCALE
1" = 160' •N••
• •• SURFACE WATERS & DATE'
os

:
•
BURDETTE LAND CONS WETLANDS IMPACT MAP : 1 = = 1 160'
SCALE
60'

160' 0 160' 320' ULTING, INC.
: W E VINTAGE POINT SUBDIVISION DRAWNBY TMB
308-D W Iv llbrook Road, Suite 200 -Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
• DEVELOPMENT BY THE NUMBERS CHKD BY: JAB
•, •
S
Telephone [phone]-Fax [phone] FUQUAY-VARINA
WAKE COUNTY
NC PROJECT #: 60040
•• •
•• ,
, FIGURE #: 4