20061361 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20060822

? e
O O
C?u?OG??Oui?
It all starts here:
December 4, 2006
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight/Express Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Dominion Resources services, Inc.
Fossil cS Hydro Projects
5000 Dominion Boulevard
Glen Allen. VA 23060
RE: Dominion - Roanoke Rapids Power Station Recreational Day Use Area
DWQ Project No. 06-1361
Dear Sir or Madam:
Enclosed please find the Certification of Completion for the dredging activities in the
Roanoke Rapids Lake, at the Dominion Roanoke Rapids Power Station Recreational Day
Use Area.
Activities associated with the dredging of the beach area, including installation of new
sand are complete.
If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to give Ms. Maria Gwynn a call at 804-
273-4547.
Sincerely, U[R@L2flVJ20
17? DEC 1 1 2006
Maria T. Gwynn DENR - tvATFR
Project Engineer `M1C"TLANDS ANDS QuauTY
TM'4W, TERERANC11
cc: Ms. Kim Lanterman. Dominion FHTS Environmental
Mr. Jamie Shern, US Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Field Office
Certification of Completion
DWQ Project No.: No-1361
Applicant: L?OPY11 P1l?fl Y j? I i'l l
Project Name:
Date of Issuance of Wetland Permit:
County: -t-t' L? L, ,
ini . ?1 1ric pwv, ?mtzlny
2 q , 'ZGC6
Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, and any
subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the 401 Oversight/Express Permitting Unit,
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service,.Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650. This form may be
returned to DWQ by the applicant, the applicant's authorized agent, or the project engineer. It is not necessary to send
certificates from all of these.
Applicant's Certification
I, -.3 , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was
used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications,
and other supporting materials. `
Signature: Date: ?b?/ • 1
Agent's Certification
I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was
used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications,
and other supporting materials.
Signature:
Date:
If this project was designed by a Certified Professional
I, F7ZSi t l1[.1 _yi.l 0. W I t---50t-l , as a duly registered Professional F-kJc-- tJ EEC„ Engineer,
Landscape Architect, Surveyor, etc.) in the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically,
weekly, full time) the construction of the project, for the Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care
and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within
substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and
specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signatur Registration No. 204-11o Date
OtO? W AT ?9QG
r
> -1
O -'C
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
August 29, 2006
DWQ Project # 06-1361
Halifax County
Ms. Kim Lanterman
Virginia Electric and Power Company
5000 Dominion Boulevard
Glen Allen, VA 23060
Subject Property: Roanoke Rapids Power Station Recreational Day Use Area
Roanoke River (Lake) [030208, 23-(22.5), WSIV, B, CA]
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Ms. Lanterman:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
within or otherwise impact 0.385 acres of open water (lake), as described in your application dated
August 18, 2006, and received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on August 22, 2006, for the
purpose of constructing the proposed swimming and recreation area. After reviewing your application,
we have decided that the impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3402
(GC3402). The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) NW39 when issued by the US
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other
required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited
to) Erosion and Sediment Control, and Non-discharge regulations. Also, this approval to proceed with
your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall expire
upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of
wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A
NCAC 2H.0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:
Amount Approved Plan Location or Reference
Open Water (lake)
intermittent 0.385 (acres)
!!t PCN page 8 of 12
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://-h2o,enr.state.ne.us/ncwetiands
One
r Carolina
Np
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Virginia Electric and Power Company
Page 2 of 4
August 29, 2006
2. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond
the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction
activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion
control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality
standards, statutes, or rules occur.
3. Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing
the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in
order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. Sufficient materials required for stabilization and/or repair of erosion control measures and
stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times.
4. Sediment and Erosion Control Measures
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum
extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is
unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that
the Division of Land Resources has released the project;
5. Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within these
boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange warning fencing
(or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved to infringe within the
buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure compliance with 15A
NCAC 213.0233 and GC 3404;
6. Deed Notifications
Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands,
waters and protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer
impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or
buffers approved for impact under this Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate. A
sample deed notification can be downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. The text of the sample deed notification may be modified
as appropriate to suit to this project;
Virginia Electric and Power Company
Page 3 of 4
August 29, 2006
7. Construction Stormwater Permit NCGO10000
Upon the approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan issued by the Division of Land
Resources (DLR) or a DLR delegated local erosion and sedimentation control program, an
NPDES General stormwater permit (NCGO10000) administered by DWQ is automatically issued
to the project. This General Permit allows stormwater to be discharged during land disturbing
construction activities as stipulated by conditions in the permit. If your project is covered by this
permit [applicable to construction projects that disturb one (1) or more acres], full compliance
with permit conditions including the sedimentation control plan, self-monitoring, record keeping
and reporting requirements are required. A copy of this permit and monitoring report forms may
be found at htW://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/Forms Doctm:ents.hon.;
8. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable
Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached
certificate of completion to the 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit, North Carolina
Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or
stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of
the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved
buffer impacts) shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is
subject to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. ISOB.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act and the Neuse riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 2B .0233. If you have
any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly or Ian McMillan at 919-733-1786.
AWKlijm
Enclosures: GC 3402
Certificate of Completion
cc: USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Tly,
lij&t
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Virginia Electric and Power Company
Page 4 of 4
August 29, 2006
Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 061361 VEandPCoRoanokeRapidsPowerStationDayUseRecArea(Halifax)401
Pamela F. Faggcrt
and D® inion,
Vice President nt an and Chief Environmental Officer
5000 Dominion Boulevard, Glen Allen, VA 23060
Phone: [phone]
20061361
OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
August 21, 2006
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Attn: Ms. Laurie Dennison
Roanoke Rapids Hydro Power Station Recreational Day Use Area
Pre-Construction Notification Application for
401 Water Quality Certification for Nationwide Permit 39
Dear Sir or Madam:
Please find attached seven copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN)
application for a 401 Water Quality Certification for a Nationwide Permit 39 to cover
proposed excavation and fill activities for a recreational day use swimming area at the
Roanoke Rapids Hydro Power Station in Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina. The
completed PCN application form, as well as an addendum to the application, a site
vicinity map, site sketches showing the day use area and the swimming area, and
photos of the swimming area are attached. In addition, a copy of the wetland
delineation report (with supporting documentation) that includes this area and a $200.00
check to cover the application fee are also attached.
Thank you for consideration of our PCN application for a 401 Water Quality Certification
for a Nationwide Permit 39. If you need additional information or have any questions,
please contact Kim Lanterman at [phone].
L"
Pamela Faggert
ag??Iu--HW95
AU G 2 2, 2006
Attachments
DENR - WATER QUALITY
\4EWp3 RIJD sYCC Rn KH

Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 2 n n P 1 ?q P
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide Permit 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here;
a 5n V D
?? Uv D
II. Applicant Information
AU G 2 2 2006
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Virginia Electric and Power Company uti4 SIC RQRf LR!NTERTER BRAN
?tt'vRs' f?E'?ti IB aTnCH
Mailing Address: 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen VA 23060, Attn: Kim
Lanterman
Telephone Number: 804-273-3051 Fax Number: 804-273-3410
E-mail Address: Kimberly Q [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: See Addendum
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Roanoke Rapids Power Station Recreational Day Use Area
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Halifax Nearest Town: Roanoke Rapids
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): See Addendum
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): See Addendum °N °W
6. Property size (acres): See Addendum
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Roanoke Rapids Lake
8. River Basin: Roanoke River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://l12o.enr.state.nc.us/a(Imin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: See Addendum
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Excavation
and fill work for a swimming area that will be part of a recreational day use area at the
Roanoke Rapids Hydro Power Station. Equipment to be used includes a long-reach
excavator. The excavated spoils will be de-watered onsite and then transported to a state-
licensed landfill for disposal See addendum for additional information.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Excavation and fill work for a swimming area
that will be part of a recreational day use area being` constructed at the Roanoke Rapids
Hydro Power Station as part of the station's FERC re-licensing agreement.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: There will be no loss of use of
aquatic functions as a result of this project There will be minimal temporary impacts (such
as increased turbidity) to the water in the swimming area during excavation and fill activities
only. Excavation and fill activities will be completed in proximately three weeks.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
sennrntely list imnncts due to both structure and flooding.

Wetland Impact

Site Number
(indicate on map)

ype of Impact
Type of Wetland

(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within

100-year
loo in
(yes/no) F Distance to

Nearest
Stream

(linear feet) Area of

Impact

(acres)
N/A

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: -- 0.15 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must he included. To calculate acreaee. multiply leneth X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
N/A

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 0
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill. excavation. dredeine. flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number
(if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on ma) ocean, etc.) (acres)
Temporary impact
N/A Roanoke Rapids Lane only from excavation Lake 0.385
and fill activities

Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0.385
Page 8 of 12
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project.
Stream Impact (acres): 0
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.385
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.385
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USAGE.
8. Pond Creation (Not Applicable)
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g.> dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
pond,
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
See Addendum.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://li2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlaiids/strm?,?ide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A - As previously discussed the project will result in minimal adverse affect to the aquatic
environment and therefore no mitigation is required.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.litm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federaUstate) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0244, or.0260.
Page II of 12
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
N/A
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
Addendum to PCN
Addendum to Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
for Nationwide Permit 39 for the Roanoke Rapids Power Station
Recreational Day Use Swimming Area
Section 11. Applicant Information - Number 2:
Virginia Electric and Power Company has utilized (or will be utilizing) the services of the
following consultants in performance of work associated with the Roanoke Rapids Recreational
Day Use Swimming Area:
1. M. J. Price Construction - General Contractor performing excavation and fill activities
associated with the swimming area - Subcontractor to Heaton Construction.
• Point of Contact at M. J. Price Construction is Mason Price; Telephone Number: 252-
537-0244; Point of Contact at Heaton Construction is Paul Heaton, Jr.; Telephone
Number: 252-535-4053
2. Mactec Engineering and Consulting, Inc. - Consulting firm that performed the wetland
delineation for the recreational day use area
• Point of Contact at Mactec is Richard Harmon; Telephone Number 919-831-8003
Section III. Project Information - Number 4:
Directions to the site are as follows:
From 1-95 North, take exit 171/NC 125 toward Roanoke Rapids. Go - 0.3 miles and turn left on
Grapevine Road (NC 125). Go -2.6 miles and turn right to follow NC 125. Go --2.3 miles and
turn right on Roanoke Avenue (NC 48). Go -0.6 miles and turn left on West 5`h Street. 5m Street
turns into Bolling Road after -0.5 miles. Stay on Bolling Road -0.5 miles and turn right on
Oakwood Avenue. Go -0.4 miles and arrive at the Roanoke Rapids Power Station. The Roanoke
Rapids Power Station is located at 100 Oakwood Avenue.
Section III. Project Information - Number 5:
Approximate coordinates for the recreational day use swimming area are as follows:
1. 36.4746° N ; 77.6754° W
2. 36.4752° N ; 77.6755° W
3. 36.4749'N; 77.6752°W
Section III. Proiect Information - Number 6:
The total area of the recreational day use area is approximately 20 acres. This PCN is for a
Nationwide Permit 39 for excavation and fill activities associated with the day use swimming
area only. The total area of the swimming area is approximately 0.385 acres.
Section III. Project Information - Number 9:
The Roanoke Rapids Day Use Recreational Area will be located adjacent to the Roanoke Rapids
Hydro Power Station and Roanoke Rapids Lake. The land adjacent to the Roanoke Rapids Day
Use Area is predominantly wooded. The recreational day use area is bordered on the north and
northeast by the Roanoke Rapids Lake dam facility, to the west by Roanoke Rapids Lake, and to
the south by residential lots.
Section III. Proiect Information - Number 10:
The project to be covered by the Nationwide Permit 39 involves excavation and fill work for a
swimming area that will be part of a recreational day use area at the Roanoke Rapids Hydro
Power Station. The total area of the swimming area is approximately 16,784 square feet (0.385
acres). This area will be excavated to a maximum depth of five (5) feet, which equates to
approximately 3,108 cubic yards of excavated material (maximum) to be removed. The
excavation will be performed to level off the slope of the swimming area for swimming/wading
purposes. There will be no excavation work done on the beach/shoreline area adjacent to the
swimming area.
After excavation activities are complete, the excavated area will be backfilled with sand at a
minimum depth of one (1) foot (approximately 622 cubic yards). All excavation and fill work
will be done below the normal pool area (i.e., below the water surface).
A long-reach excavator will be used to perform the excavation activities. The long-reach
excavator will excavate the material and place it directly into 30-ton trucks. The trucks will
transport the spoils to a cleared, upper frisbee golf course hole for dewatering. Appropriate
erosion and sediment controls will be installed around the dewatering area to ensure that the
spoils are allowed to dry without any impact to the area from runoff. After the spoils are de-
watered, the spoils will be transported by 30-ton trucks to a state-licensed landfill. The name of
the landfill where the de-watered spoils will be disposed is Price Borrow Pit (903)/Landfill,
located in Littleton, Halifax County, North Carolina.
Based upon the results of a wetland delineation (report attached) performed for the recreational
day use area, there are no wetlands located in or around the swimming area where the excavation
and fill work will be performed. Therefore, there will be no wetland impacts associated with the
project.
Section VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization
A long-reach excavator will be used to perform the excavation and fill activities. The long-reach
excavator will deposit the excavated spoils directly into 30-ton trucks for transport to the de-
watering area. This method will eliminate double handling of the material. No spoils will be
placed on the beach area. After being de-watered, the spoils will be transported to a state-
licensed landfill for disposal.
The project will also utilize existing pathways to the swimming area, as much as possible, and
mats will be placed on the pathways (as conditions warrant) while the trucks are using the area.
The NC DENR approved Erosion and Sediment Control measures will be put into place prior to
the start of the excavation work.
Site Vicinity Map
TopoZone - The Web's Topographic Map
Page 1 of 1
• -, i
{tit '?,?/i' ?':•?4?,1 ? l', r i - K' ?? --? ? ? ? ,1 f, l..
-7 -1
"tl ?'?'c''. S `t'?L?, \,'- ?e. ••L? f .?7- f?7. j .•;r,.V?,1 /
`.. ?y..? .? 11 •Yl?i? ? ;1 F r • {'y 'w ? '` ?? , _ ?? ' -` ? ??.1J vary `,.
„\ - "J " Z ur.-tt*.. 1i4.: '\ y s _ (?. ,-„1 ' ?! ?'«l L \ i 3 ,.r
15 f
?? ?- 1-4- '- ;'? ?L/1?''/ : r. `? ?l;O 7th _? `} ~ ?:I\? !'' ?j? l ?\ ? ?' ',;:g5 r^,r-- ') i< ?"`?'-1-•
.-
fj? \w!t':4 P dsy
LAKE
yy i - +.?,•fr-:v? 1 ?? t?5 !r, r^ ?, ?._ ? j? .- -sr_ ?.. ? ?,, I^ - _
t •V. '? 5 ?-' -?? ..
1
77
• '1' (; ?_ - ? ' r ?, ?----[[ ` s Vii...' ' , f? `? _ .? (? ?; t
1 ; ? s3 ???? \1 ` (. ? fir ?! ? ?', ,l ''' -? ? , ? •1 ?(?
0 1 2 3 4 5 km 0
0 0.8 1.6 2.4 3.2 4 roi
Map center is 36.47600N, 77.6718°W (WGS84/NAD83)
Roanoko Rapids quadrangle
Projection Is UTM Zone 18 NAD83 Datum
http:/hr%v%v.topozone.com/print.asp?z=18&n=4040061 &e=260628&s=200&size=l&u=5&layer--D... 8/9/2006
Site Sketches
?1
k?;Jc?',
FENCE HITH A MIN. 10' GATE AT THE AC
TC
LA<E
REMOVE ORGANIG MATERIAL AND DREDGE THE
BOTTOM WITHIN THE DE5I6NATED PUBLIC 5WIMMING
AREA. DREDGING DEPTH TO BE A MIN. OF 5611 AND
A MAX. OF 60". IF NECESSARY, THE CONTRACTOR
MAY EXCEED THE 60" DREDGE DEPTH TO REMOVE
NATURAL AND MADE MADE OBSTRUCTIONS. UPON
COMPLETION OF REMOVING ALL OBSTRUCTIONS,
THE CONTRACTOR WILL PLACE A MINIMUM OF I
FOOT OF SAND AT THE BOTTOM ELEVATION OF THE
ENTIRE 5WIMMING AREA. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
VERIFY AND REMOVE IRREGULAR GRADE CHANGES
BELOW THE WATER SURFACE. CONTRACTOR SHALL
PROVIDE AN A5-BUILT TOPOGRAPHIG SURVEY OF
THE 5WIMMING AREA UPON COMPLETION OF
DREDGING AND THE PLACEMENT OF SAND.
DREDGED MATERIAL WILL BE D15P05ED OF
AT A LICENSED OFF-51TE FACILITY.
:M DAMAGED TEES AND STUMPS
/E ADDITIONAL TREES TO MAKE
)R THE PROPOSED RECREATION
DEMOLISH EXISTING UPPER STRUCTURE. CONTRk
EXERCISE GREAT CARE TO KEEP EXISTING PIER
CONDITION. CONTRACTOR HILL VERIFY THE P11
GOOD CONDITION FOR NEW DECK TO BE
CONTRACTOR HILL REMOVE P05T5, is
BARBED WIRE. WHEN REMOVING P05T5
P05T, INCLUDING FOUNDATION WILL BI
ALL MATERIALS WILL BE DISPOSED (
AT A LICENSE
FACILITIES.
loo _ o e
:D LIMITS OF GLEARING ge 40 ,!/ /A`?
TYPICAL ,- a ?? _ l++, ,I, t r
12
? 'mot \ ?. i \ ` \ `\ t ? `. \ `t + + I ! I I I
4 DES `\ ? ` `\ 1 \` `\ 1 y `? l\` ti \ `\ ? 1 I ! r 7 I I I 1 I ! I
f3 Nt \? . \ `? `? . r i `\ t`\ \ ?? , \ \ \ i i 1 , , \ i t\ \ti t II 1 t I t 1 `
/ I \ ` ? \ `\ `? . ? \ \ I . J? y"" t i \ \ \ t i i , t 1 i \` t` + t I
/ 1 , \ \ \ ? ` ?` . `? `? 1, 1.' Cs?uREY] \ \ \ ` t \ ` , t 11 I 1 1 t I ?
I , 0 `? ??? ,•` 1` ?`? `? ?\ ?..' 1' /' + ` `t `\ ` \ \ `\\` ` `\ ti t t , ? ttt ttl ' , r i I I t
It? ! D£NSEITREES
,i ? ?\ 1 1 ! , `, `? ?? / SE TREIS
It I
\ ` \ 1 1
t
c C=)

oz,
NP
Nap

LLJ
_ _ ?`?`:- ? j?`? /`? [? (( '`\•..,? iii` ?i`, ?? D [?
(fir
ONO

?; \ r cu Q
s?? d cY) i
H ? H

%i
Jrvvv
Li C-) 9 Vk:
»
j
LC\L
1
Ila
Irl 'Dg PZ.
s«jn
1 / //
Photos of the Day Use Swimming Area

1 ? {
e? ids ? 1.15 Sir i rn m'? n /?t'ec?.
???
? ? ?
Kt)a,n,)Le-- R?,,pJS
?P?a b 4,LtpN A- 'v rn
bltl list,
btx.? 0 T
c??J,rn rnI nq Ar?
gfpt olS 71US,_, ?i.J? rn m i n AYe?
`? ?
C Q o-?v -7-x?-f rc?? m e 0- S ?.J m m i n? a. c ?v)
Wetland Delineation Report

I/K
g MACTEC
engineering and constructing a better tomorrow
August 7, 2006
Mr. Robert Williams
Dominion Resources Services, Inc.
5000 Dominion Blvd.
TTP 18
Glen Allen, VA 23060
RE: Roanoke Rapids Day Use Wetland Delineation
Roanoke Rapids Lake and Lake Gaston, North Carolina and Virginia
MACTEC Project No. 6470-06-1484
Dear Mr. Williams:
Thank you for contacting Mactec Engineering and Consulting, Inc., (MACTEC) concerning the
above referenced project. It is our understanding that you requested a jurisdictional wetland and
stream delineation adjacent to the Roanoke Rapids Lake and Lake Gaston located in Halifax,
Northampton, and Warren Counties, North Carolina and Mecklenburg County, Virginia. The
seven project sites (2 sites at Roanoke Rapids Lake and 5 sites at Lake Gaston) are adjacent to
the shorelines of the restive lakes. Figure 1 provides a general location of the seven proposed
project areas. This letter outlines our findings pertaining to the jurisdictional delineation.
Prior to the initiation of field efforts, available sources were reviewed, including U.S. Geological
Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute topographic quadrangles, National Wetland Inventory (NWI),
quadrangles, and Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) soils mapping for Halifax,
Northampton, and Warren Counties, North Carolina and Mecklenburg County, Virginia.
Wetlands
Jurisdictional wetlands are defined by 33 CFR 328.3(b) and are protected by Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), which is administered and enforced by the US Army Corps
of Engineers (USACE). For this investigation, wetlands are those areas which satisfy the
technical criteria in the 1987 USACE Wetlands Delineation Manual (Technical Report Y-87-1).
The field investigation included an inspection of the entire easement boundary to identify areas
which exhibited wetland characteristics. Jurisdictional wetlands are defined in the field as areas
that have positive evidence of three environmental parameters:
v Hydrophytie vegetation (vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions);
o Wetland hydrology (substrate that is inundated or saturated to the surface at some time
during the growing season); and
a Hydric soils (soils that possess characteristics that are associated with reducing/anaerobic soil
conditions).
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.
3301 Atlantic Avenue • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone: [phone]. • Fax: [phone]
www.moctoc.com
I
Roanoke Rapids Day Use Welland Delineation A ugust 7, 2006
Roanoke Rapids Lake and Lake Gaston
MACTEC Project no. 6470-06-1484
Seven areas (Areas 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8) were surveyed for jurisdictional wetlands. The
landward limits of wetland jurisdiction within the project areas were determined using the
Routine On-Site Determination (RD) method as defined in the USACE Wetlands Delineation
Manual. Observations on vegetation, soils, and hydrology were recorded on the field data forms.
The wetland boundaries were marked in the field with red color and blue color flagging tape.
Flag points were sequentially labeled with the wetland unit designation and flag location number.
Flag locations were registered using a handheld Global Positioning System (GPS) unit. All
registered GPS data were differentially-corrected to sub-meter accuracy. A jurisdictional
wetland polygon was generated from the corrected GPS data and wetland acreage was
determined using an automated Geographic Information System (GIS) feature.
Wetland areas were evaluated using the three-parameter approach outlined by the USACE 1987
Wetlands Delineation Manual, which requires the presence of hydric soils, hydrophytic
vegetation, and evidence of wetland hydrology.
The field investigation was conducted on 24 July 2006. Three jurisdictional wetland areas were
delineated within the seven project areas: Area 1 (0.15 acres), Area 2 (< 0.02 acres), and Area 8
(5 0.01). The boundaries of the wetlands, as mapped through GPS technology, are depicted on
Figures 2A, 2B, and 2C.
Wetlands within Areas 1 and 8 are characterized as forested riparian wetlands. Based on
Cowardin et. al (1979) these wetlands would be classified as PFOIC (palustrine, forested, broad-
leaved deciduous, seasonally flooded). Vegetation within wetlands at Area I and 8 generally
consisted of red maple (facer rubrum), tulip-tree (Liriodendron tulipifera), cinnamon fern
(Osmunda cinnantomea), arrow arum (Peltandra virginica), tag alder (Alnus serrulata), and
Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides). Data on vegetation, soils, and hydrology of the
wetland areas were recorded on the RD field forms (see Attachments).
Wetlands within Area 2 are characterized as emergent marsh. Based on Cowardin et. al (1979)
these wetlands would be classified as L2EM (lacustrine, littoral, emergent). Vegetation within
wetlands at Area consists primarily of spike-rush (Eleocharis obtuse). Data on vegetation, soils,
and hydrology of the wetland areas were recorded on the RD field forms (see Attachments).
Streams
MACTEC scientists conducted a field reconnaissance of the easement area to determine the
presence or absence of perennial stream channels. The methods for determination of stream
classification were in accordance with the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ) stream evaluation
protocols in Identification Methods for the Origins of Intermittent and Perennial Streams (Version
3.1), dated February 28, 2005. The stream channel assessment included a qualitative review of
channel characteristics (i.e., biological, hydrological, and geomorphological components) for the
purpose of documenting ephemeral (non jurisdictional) versus intermittent or perennial channels.
No perennial or intermittent stream channels were identified within the project study area.
2
Roanoke Rapids Day Use Welland Delineation
Roanoke Rapids Lake and Lake Gaston
AMCTEC Project no. 6470-06-1484
August 7, 2006
Summa",
MACTEC identified and delineated three wetlands at three different sites. The three delineated
wetland sites ranged in size from < 0.01 acres to 0.15 acres. No perennial or intermittent stream
channels were identified within the project site. Wetland impacts exceeding 0.10-acre will
require a permit from the USACE.
MACTEC appreciates this chance to provide Dominion Resource Services, Inc. our services and
look forward to working with you in the future. Please contact Mr. Richard Harmon at (919)
831-8003 should you have any questions regarding this report.
Sincerely,
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, INC.
Lauren Saal
Staff Scientist
Richard G. Harmon
Principal Natural Resource Scientist
Attachment: Location Map
Delineation Map
RM Forms
Scale: Not To Scale
Swam: DcLm= (Strad Attu USA, version 7
WetLmd Delineawasp DOMINION
I RESOURCES
Raaooke RapWwlAe Gaston SERVICES
Noah Carolina A Virginia �...._
Plexal ' / Dow
Cho"Mal
AIM ACTECProject Vicinity -Map
6470.061484

11,
=y A .

LEGEND
Roads
,•, Wetland (GPS)
Wetland = 0.15 acres
100 0 100 200 Fog
Scale: 1"= 250'
Wetland Delineation DOMINION
RESOURCES
Area 1: Roanoke Rapids Lake Day Use SERVICES
Halifax County. North Carolina
POwlwlw'

repared / Date:
'hocked / Date:
Jurisdictional Waters
1998 Color Infrared Photograp

LEGEND
Roads
•. Wetlands (GPS)
Wetland Area = < 0.02 acres
50 0 50 100 FW
Scale: P= 1251

Wetland Delineation DOMINION
RESOURCES
Area 2: Lake Gawn Day Use SERVICES
Halifax County, North Carolina
e..ir.r
Im

Prepared / Date:
Checked / Date:
Jurisdictional Waters
1998 Color Infrared Photos
LEGEND
Q Wetland (GPS)
Wetland = < 0.01 acres
60 0 so 100 Feet
Scale: V= 125'
Source: Radford University, USGS 1994 C1R Aerial
Prepared For.-
Wetland
or.Wetland Delineation DOMINION
Area 8: Bank Fishing At Miles Creek RESOURCES
Mecklenburg County, Virginia SERVICES
Prepared / Date:
Checked / Date:
Jurisdictional Waters
MACTEC 1998 Color Infrared Photography
6470-06-1484 Figure 2C
f
I I

1 -i
.14,
, J,ti- aY .INA e _ •I: .'��
3
y�•] .r� ,�, i IIIf. • 1. , � '. r
7�► y , J,� t; 1
,.+ej erg -fit 5. �+ . •� ,��,',.I e 1' e J�ffll. '41�I �`+5
70;
'ki.� ' •,,I I '� , •—'�cIM1'.';.
OIL" 11w,
4.
I'� �`�. , +' .,,:_T1� ' �,.'` 'lel.r+ • '�, k�"r'�1�. , ��5t1+�� 4 �'r'_" �•M• `»J
1 fir• �„�;.;•.TI'� 'c' ��•yr,,r'�r-, � Q ') �,,. M��
+ Site of
• 1�' �j , I�_ j1, 1 ra✓ � t. �� ... �4 r �` f � tf'� l k f'-,+-"ir .'!' •� '''1► �,r
1
�x 1
LEGEND 4 ,+'/f�1
Q Wetlands (GPS)'
Wetland Area = < 0.02 acres 'j rf � f '' �,, -4
250 0 250 Feet ' r ff r Fr-�" "•� 4'ti� ti irk` f.
Scale: 1" = 500' Prepared / Date:
Source: NCDOT, USGS (Roanoke RapidsTopographic Quadrangle) Checked / Date:
Prepared For: Prepared By.-
Wetland
y:Wetland Delineation DOMINION
Area 2: Lake Gaston Day Use RESOURCES �MACTEC Vicinity Map
Halifax County, North Carolina SERVICES
Project: 6470-06-1484 Figure 3B

;L_ _ 1,??-,??Lss
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project I Site: ` ; r ?- ug
Applicant/ Owner: Ems. c: - 5'eY Etc
Investigator: W PL Date: %2 ?1 c
County: - ' U-,:-
State:
N C.
-
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes 4- No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No_,
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No_X__
(explain on reverse if needed) Community ID: k1ril i
Transect ID:
Plot ID:
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator

2. l.frS n P.bt ?'?tt ??1: ?o Tr F-AC 10.
3. u
l i W +
l 11.
4. -l v
ire- it,' c 1 j3?- 12.
s. o c° e rCi) 13.
6• 14.
7. is.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAG). Z
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
_ Other Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: ILIA 0 )
Secondary
indicators:
1
"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: ? in
) 4.
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12
. Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil: S(1 F" Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
?
(Series and Phase): I C 1 k C.
tcry f,,:L,. Drainage Class:

Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No?
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsoil Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
-- 4 In 'Ye
- f-f
-
Hydric Soil Indicators:
.- Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon i High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ?C No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ?f No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes No?
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
.(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)

ProjectlSite:7?,??no?'.?C'.??aI
1
.SlL%I'?p r, ?1f 6?r? 'Z 20G
Date:
Applicant / Owner: County:
Investigator: State:

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes, No Community ID: u -
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No iY Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. ,nom f re'o F& u 9.
2. ?J het d c? Tr,,j M( 10.
3. Cn r tl ?: ? b 1z' = 11-
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-).
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other _ Inundated
_Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available - water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: Al A_(in.) Secondary Indicators:
_ Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit:V /1 n.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: ;/ j I ica ?vY
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munseli Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Solis
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Y Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _ No X Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No -?x Within a Wetland? Yes____ No4
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project! Site: dpi ,C' S c,?? ,0 2 Date: Iy Zy 01
Applicant 1 Owner: r?
Investigator: m , c. ?u ill County: e ffi
State:- I r

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes a No Community ID&J--p-L
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)?
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No__X_
Yes No L ,2 Transect ID:
Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1 5 9.
2. mA( 10.
3. 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-).
Remarks: [

y? S U i E< f' Y i?S GL
t,J ,o fl a tell & Yea C a ut cJ) 0 id
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
_ Other Inundated
_Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: ?(in.)
Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munseli Moist) ( Munsell Moist) AbundancelContrast Structure, etc.

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon ! High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YesC No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Within a Wetland? YesX No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project! Site: ca4&C e Rar fd rl c DA 166 Date: ? Ju d
Applicant/ Owner: , l uvc t0 '- County:
Investigator: I State: A I C
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: u. , .
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dorninant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. 9.
2. 10.
3. 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-).
Remarks: yi /Q ?e?> ?)6 ) (,f /a ,A Q,V . 4 G V ?e ? p 4Y lc.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
_ Other _ inundated
-Saturated in Upper 12"
_ No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: AIA (in.) Secondary Indicators:

4 Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit:
-{in.) Water-Stained Leaves

Depth to Saturated Soil: 7 (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes- No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsoll Moist) Abiindance/Contrast Structure, etc.

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol Concretions
_
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
~
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Cy
CJ Sep bd f
u E F c; c> V ?..
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No, Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No - X Within a Wetland? Yes` No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site:1-4kil 6!a t) 4 A F Prll 8 Date: 2 2 (7 (?
Applicant! Ow'
n
er:• a u_ + AY' ?S -" County ??
7
?
Investigator: Vn ci v Yt1.t1'1, State:
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes _ No Community IDI) ljlll,
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No-,,,y Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes Nom Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. c _ um -Le-11 r-k 9.
2 ` 6 i gun ?7i i i ?? 7. y P-P = G' f- 10.
3. o S ??CI?J 11.
4..('terni?ta5 C2YOl?wiau ??? 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 1s.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 1062o
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other _ Inundated
C Saturated in Upper 12"
_ No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water:
4A (in.)
- Secondary Indicators:

Depth to Free Water in Pit: AZA
(in
) Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
.
- _ Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: ` (2(in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist)_ Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon - High Organic Content In Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
XAquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes '
--/< No Within a Wetland? Yes-4 No_
Hydric Soils Present? Yes 4 No
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project I Site:`-c< < •k I, t4 e e2 Date: G 1 zcw
Applicant/ Owner: ?. Zyicr?s,?ty?C. Cotutty:
Investigator:- 1-1 A nti4 State: V
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1-. vA 1. r '(' TT-P? C 9.
2. k - 0"-1 .4 10.
3.TT o 0. e- --W- 11.
12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-).QLO_
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
_ Other Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
4
Depth of Surface Water: A/ 1 Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.)
) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) FAC•Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: /v f7 p?^tYtcu?? vY S?C??Le?aY ttiedica???S'
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes- No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast structure, etc,
Q? zats
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
No X Is the Sampling Point
No Within a Wetland? Yes No ?'
No x
Remarks:
J i a
Yamda F. Faggot ' ! ' J ?? ,? o amp
Vicc Presidcnt and Chicf Em ironmcntal Of iiccr a •._ a ??=? :? ` `?`? ? ? ``??? ?
5000 Dominion 13ou1cvard, Ucn Allcn, VA 23060
Phonc: 80-i-273-3467
OVERNIGHT DELIVERY - 2 0 0 6 1 3 6
August 21, 2006 Rr(;1!V ED
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Attn: Ms. Laurie Dennison
Roanoke Rapids Hydro Power Station Recreational Day Use Area
Pre-Construction Notification Application for
401 Water Quality Certification for Nationwide Permit 39
Dear Sir or Madam:
Please find attached seven copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN)
application for a 401 Water Quality Certification for a Nationwide Permit 39 to cover
proposed excavation and fill activities for a recreational day use swimming area at the
Roanoke Rapids Hydro Power Station in Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina. The
completed PCN application form, as well as an addendum to the application, a site
vicinity map, site sketches showing the day use area and the swimming area, and
photos of the swimming area are attached. In addition, a copy of the wetland
delineation report (with supporting documentation) that includes this area and a $200.00
check to cover the application fee are also attached.
Thank you for consideration of our PCN application for a 401 Water Quality Certification
for a Nationwide Permit 39. If you need additional information or have any questions,
please contact Kim Lanterman at [phone].
Sincerely,
L
Pamela Faggert
Attachments
flo@@#
A ijG
r C006.
lizi ? ' A ?bf, 7 r lz ,
"'U3f(?q??19 t?C ?JC/1
t
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
20061361
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "NIA".)
1. Processing
II.

Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide Permit 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), chec Jem ?J
?J D
Applicant Information

AUG 2 2, 2006
1. Owner/Applicant Information DENR - WATER QUALITY
Name: Virginia Electric and Power Company YJETLALC',ANDST0R?,1mTFRRF?,%C1J
Mailing Address: 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, VA 23060, Attn: Ms. Kim
Lanterman
Telephone Number: 804-273-3051 Fax Number:-804-273-3410
E-mail Address: Kimberly 0 [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: See Addendum
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
5.
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Roanoke Rapids Power Station Recreational Day Use Area
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Halifax Nearest Town: Roanoke Rapids
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): See Addendum
Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line,
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): See Addendum °N
6. Property size (acres): See Addendum
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Roanoke Rapids Lake
8. River Basin: Roanoke River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http:/ih2o.enr.state.nc.us/adinin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: See Addendum
attach a sheet that
ow
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Excavation
and fill work for a swimming area that will be part of a recreational day use area at the
Roanoke Rapids Hydro Power Station. Equipment to be used includes a long-reach
excavator. The excavated spoils will be de-watered onsite placed into a 30-ton truck, and
transported to a state-licensed landfill for disposal. See addendum for additional information.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Excavation and fill work for a swimming area
that will be part of a recreational day use area being constructed at the Roanoke Rapids
Hydro Power Station as part of the station's FERC re-licensing agreement.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12
I . Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: There will be no loss of use of
aquatic functions as a result of this project There will be minimal temporary impacts to the
water in the swimming area during dredge and fill activities. Dredge and fill activities will
be completed in approximately three weeks with no permanent impacts to open waters or
water quality.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
se aratel list im acts due to both structure and floodin .
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
( es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
N/A

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: - 0.15 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Intermittent. Perennial Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
N/A

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 0
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill. excavation. dreduint?. floodine, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on ma) ocean, etc.) (acres)
Temporary impact
Roanoke Rapids Lane only from dredge and Lake 0.385
fill activities

Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0.385
Page 8 of 12
6
List the cumulative im act to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project.
Stream Impact (acres): 0
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.385
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.385
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation (Not Applicable)
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
See Addendum.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0244, or.0260.
Page 11 of 12
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
N/A
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://12o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
Addendum to PCN
Addendum to Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
for Nationwide Permit 39 for the Roanoke Rapids Power Station
Recreational Day Use Swimming Area
Section II. Applicant Information - Number 2:
Virginia Electric and Power Company has utilized (or will be utilizing) the services of the
following consultants in performance of work associated with the Roanoke Rapids Recreational
Day Use Swimming Area:
1. M. J. Price Construction - General Contractor performing excavation and fill activities
associated with the swimming area - Subcontractor to Heaton Construction.
• Point of Contact at M. J. Price Construction is Mason Price; Telephone Number: 252-
537-0244; Point of Contact at Heaton Construction is Paul Heaton, Jr.; Telephone
Number: 252-535-4053
2. Mactec Engineering and Consulting, Inc. - Consulting firm that performed the wetland
delineation for the recreational day use area
• Point of Contact at Mactec is Richard Harmon; Telephone Number 919-831-8003
Section III. Project Information - Number 4:
Directions to the site are as follows:
From I-95 North, take exit 1711NC 125 toward Roanoke Rapids. Go - 0.3 miles and turn left on
Grapevine Road (NC 125). Go -2.6 miles and turn right to follow NC 125. Go -2.3 miles and
turn right on Roanoke Avenue (NC 48). Go -0.6 miles and turn left on West 5 h Street. 5`h Street
turns into Bolling Road after -0.5 miles. Stay on Bolling Road -0.5 miles and turn right on
Oakwood Avenue. Go -0.4 miles and arrive at the Roanoke Rapids Power Station. The Roanoke
Rapids Power Station is located at 100 Oakwood Avenue.
Section III. Project Information - Number 5:
Approximate coordinates for the recreational day use swimming area are as follows:
1. 36.4746'N; 77.6754°W
2. 36.4752° N ; 77.6755° W
3. 36.4749° N ; 77.6752° W
Section III. Project Information - Number 6:
The total area of the recreational day use area is approximately 20 acres. This PCN is for a
Nationwide Permit 39 for excavation and fill activities associated with the day use swimming
area only. The total area of the swimming area is approximately 0.385 acres.
Section III. Project Information - Number 9:
The Roanoke Rapids Day Use Recreational Area will be located adjacent to the Roanoke Rapids
Hydro Power Station and Roanoke Rapids Lake. The land adjacent to the Roanoke Rapids Day
Use Area is predominantly wooded. The recreational day use area is bordered on the north and
northeast by the Roanoke Rapids Lake dam facility, to the west by Roanoke Rapids Lake, and to
the south by residential lots.
Section 111. Proiect Information - Number 10:
The project to be covered by the Nationwide Permit 39 involves excavation and fill work for a
swimming area that will be part of a recreational day use area at the Roanoke Rapids Hydro
Power Station. The total area of the swimming area is approximately 16,784 square feet (0.385
acres). This area will be excavated to a maximum depth of five (5) feet, which equates to
approximately 3,108 cubic yards of excavated material (maximum) to be removed. The
excavation will be performed to level off the slope of the swimming area for swimming/wading
purposes. There will be no excavation work done on the beach/shoreline area adjacent to the
swimming area.
After excavation activities are complete, the excavated area will be backfilled with sand at a
minimum depth of one (1) foot (approximately 622 cubic yards). All excavation and fill work
will be done below the normal pool area (i.e., below the water surface).
A long-reach excavator will be used to perform the excavation activities. The long-reach
excavator will excavate the material and place it directly into 30-ton trucks. The trucks will
transport the spoils to a cleared, upper frisbee golf course hole for dewatering. Appropriate
erosion and sediment controls will be installed around the dewatering area to ensure that the
spoils are allowed to dry without any impact to the area from runoff. After the spoils are de-
watered, the spoils will be transported by 30-ton trucks to a state-licensed landfill. The name of
the landfill where the de-watered spoils will be disposed is Price Borrow Pit (903)/Landfill,
located in Littleton, Halifax County, North Carolina.
Based upon the results of a wetland delineation (report attached) performed for the recreational
day use area, there are no wetlands located in or around the swimming area where the excavation
and fill work will be performed. Therefore, there will be no wetland impacts associated with the
project.
Section VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization
A long-reach excavator will be used to perform the excavation and fill activities. The long-reach
excavator will deposit the excavated spoils directly into 30-ton trucks for transport to the de-
watering area. This method will eliminate double handling of the material. No spoils will be
placed on the beach area. After being de-watered, the spoils will be transported to a state-
licensed landfill for disposal.
The project will also utilize existing pathways to the swimming area, as much as possible, and
mats will be placed on the pathways (as conditions warrant) while the trucks are using the area.
The NC DENR approved Erosion and Sediment Control measures will be put into place prior to
the start of the excavation work.
Site Vicinity Map
tiGt1
FENCE WITH A MIN. 10' GATE AT THE AL
NO<E F DS

REMOVE ORGANIC MATERIAL AND DREDGE THE
BOTTOM WITHIN THE DESIGNATED PUBLIC. 5WIMMIN6
AREA. DREDGING DEPTH TO BE A MIN. OF 56" AND
A MAX. OF 60". IF NECE55ARY, THE CONTRACTOR
MAY EXCEED THE 60" DREDGE DEPTH TO REMOVE
NATURAL AND MADE MADE 0135TRUGTION5. UPON
COMPLETION OF REMOVIN6 ALL OB5TRUCTION5,
THE CONTRACTOR WILL PLACE A MINIMUM OF
FOOT OF 5AND AT THE BOTTOM ELEVATION OF THE
ENTIRE 5NIMMING AREA. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
VERIFY AND REMOVE IRREGULAR GRADE GHAN6E5
BELOW THE HATER 5URFACE. GONTRAGTOR 5HALL
PROVIDE AN A5-BUILT TOP06RAPHIG SURVEY OF
THE 5NIMMING AREA UPON COMPLETION OF
DREDGING AND THE PLACEMENT OF 5AND.
DREDGED MATERIAL WILL BE D15P05ED OF
AT A LIGEN5ED OFF-51TE FACILITY.
:M DAMAGED TEES AND 5TUMP5
/E ADDITIONAL TREE5 TO MAKE
)R THE PROP05ED RECREATION
DEMOL15H EXI5TIN6 UPPER 5TRUGTURE. CONTRP
EXERCISE GREAT CARE TO KEEP EX15TINS PIES
CONDITION. CONTRACTOR WILL VERIFY THE Pit
GOOD CONDITION FOR NEW DECK TO BE
CONTRACTOR WILL REMOVE P05T5, f
BARBED WIRE. WHEN REMOVIN5 P05T5
P05T, INCLUDING FOUNDATION WILL BI
ALL MATERIALS HILL BE DI5PO5ED c
AT A LICENSE
FACILITIES.
r
:D LIMITS OF GLEARIN6 .0e 40 f N
TYPICAL \ I \` / , ? ` \ r r r r , ' r r
12
?-'?' ?t \ `? \ \ ` \ ` t ? `\ \ \ I r 1 r i 1 I
jFtE-F'S . \ ` I i ? \ \ \ t r y 1 ? '{ \ \ \ \ I \ I , I r 1 1 + I 1 I tH
Ali
3r e
! r \ ` ` `\ `? `\ `\ ?? `! 1 ` \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I t + 1
I V5
\ \ `. \ `. ` ` \. ( \ \ l t 'lid 1 \ \ 1 1 \ ` \ / / ! ! M
\ . \ \ \ `? \ `\ i + l .tom/, t + \ 1 1 \ ? \ \ / ' ,? ' !
DENSE, TREES `t \ \ ?? \\ \\\?\ ' .? t 1 li I 1 `?
11'`% ? ?\\ \ + ` r !/r \` \\`?\\ \ /CE SE TRC?S \\ \\ \\\\\``\ 1 I { \`\ _` ? V ??_
"` ? ti ? `?\?? \ \ `rte -^ `\' V \ \ \ \ Y \ \` \
? Y
os?? X00 ?\Q' r,6?Y Use AREA " I
i
i
/
r /
1
1
1 l
t 1
t \
\t
l l
1 '
1 ?t

\ i1
t
t,
l
1
SE THE
)`_.,.. U F r
a
r
i
Q.
00
0
\M
tom` \

r
? j
N
? y
N
rt 'rr lr j l

J
r ? t
NO
? I-ars ` _ ?-?r
A14
I-A2
\'?\\ 13 I-A3 I-A
I-A

1
? ?1•
cy
ja0
Q
to
CID
V-
- 6
vl
DD\
C?

It /
s
?P? PA f'
r
..a
? o
Photos of the Day Use Swimming Area
` ? _
'?
Wetland Delineation Report
-? J ACTEC
/`
engineering and constructing a better tomorrow
August 7, 2006
Mr. Robert Williams
Dominion Resources Services, Inc.
5000 Dominion Blvd.
TT? 18
Glen Allen, VA 23060
RE: Roanoke Rapids Day Use Wetland Delineation
Roanoke Rapids Lake and Lake Gaston, North Carolina and Virginia
MACTEC Project No. 6470-06-1484
Dear Mr. Williams:
Thank you for contacting Mactec Engineering and Consulting, Inc., (MACTEC) concerning the
above referenced project. It is our understanding that you requested a jurisdictional wetland and
stream delineation adjacent to the Roanoke Rapids Lake and Lake Gaston located in Halifax,
Northampton, and Warren Counties, North Carolina and Mecklenburg County, Virginia. The
seven project sites (2 sites at Roanoke Rapids Lake and 5 sites at Lake Gaston) are adjacent to
the shorelines of the restive lakes. Figure 1 provides a general location of the seven proposed
project areas. This letter outlines our findings pertaining to the jurisdictional delineation.
Prior to the initiation of field efforts, available sources were reviewed, including U.S. Geological
Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute topographic quadrangles, National Wetland Inventory (NWI),
quadrangles, and Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) soils mapping for Halifax,
Northampton, and Warren Counties, North Carolina and Mecklenburg County, Virginia.
Wetlands
Jurisdictional wetlands are defined by 33 CFR 328.3(b) and are protected by Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), which is administered and enforced by the US Army Corps
of Engineers (USACE). For this investigation, wetlands are those areas which satisfy the
technical criteria in the 1987 USACE Wetlands Delineation Manual (Technical Report Y-87-1).
The field investigation included an inspection of the entire easement boundary to identify areas
which exhibited wetland characteristics. Jurisdictional wetlands are defined in the field as areas
that have positive evidence of three environmental parameters:
o Hydrophytic vegetation (vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions);
© Wetland hydrology (substrate that is inundated or saturated to the surface at some time
during the growing season); and
v Hydric soils (soils that possess characteristics that are associated with reducinglanaerobic soil
conditions).
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.
3301 Atlantic Avenue 0 Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone: 919.876.041(2 • Fax: [phone] www.mactoc.com
Roanoke Rapids Day Use Welland Delineation August 7, 2006
Roanoke Rapids Lake and Lake Gaston
rb1ACT.EC Project no. 6470-06-1484
Seven areas (Areas 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8) were surveyed for jurisdictional wetlands. The
landward limits of wetland jurisdiction within the project areas were determined using the
Routine On-Site Determination (RD) method as defined in the USACE Wetlands Delineation
Manual. Observations on vegetation, soils, and hydrology were recorded on the field data forms.
The wetland boundaries were marked in the field with red color and blue color flagging tape.
Flag points were sequentially labeled with the wetland unit designation and flag location number.
Flag locations were registered using a handheld Global Positioning System (GPS) unit. All
registered GPS data were differentially-corrected to sub-meter accuracy. A jurisdictional
wetland polygon was generated from the corrected GPS data and wetland acreage was
determined using an automated Geographic Information System (GIS) feature.
Wetland areas were evaluated using the three-parameter approach outlined by the USACE 1987
Wetlands Delineation Manual, which requires the presence of hydric soils, hydrophytic
vegetation, and evidence of wetland hydrology.
The field investigation was conducted on 24 July 2006. Three jurisdictional wetland areas were
delineated within the seven project areas: Area 1 (0.15 acres), Area 2 (< 0.02 acres), and Area 8
(<_ 0.01). The boundaries of the wetlands, as mapped through GPS technology, are depicted on
Figures 2A, 2B, and 2C.
Wetlands within Areas 1 and 8 are characterized as forested riparian wetlands. Based on
Cowardin et. al (1979) these wetlands would be classified as PF01 C (palustrine, forested, broad-
leaved deciduous, seasonally flooded). Vegetation within wetlands at Area I and 8 generally
consisted of red maple (Ater rubruna), tulip-tree (Liriodendron tulipifera), cinnamon fern
(Osmunda cinnanionnea), arrow arum (Peltandra virglnica), tag alder (Alnus serrulata), and
Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides). Data on vegetation, soils, and hydrology of the
wetland areas were recorded on the RD field forms (see Attachments).
Wetlands within Area 2 are characterized as emergent marsh. Based on Cowardin et. al (1979)
these wetlands would be classified as L2EM (lacustrine, littoral, emergent). Vegetation within
wetlands at Area consists primarily of spike-rush (Eleocharis obtuse). Data on vegetation, soils,
and hydrology of the wetland areas were recorded on the RD field forms (see Attachments).
Streams
MACTEC scientists conducted a field reconnaissance of the easement area to determine the
presence or absence of perennial stream channels. The methods for determination of stream
classification were in accordance with the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ) stream evaluation
protocols in Identification Methods for the Origins of Intertnittent and Perennial Streams (Version
3.1), dated February 28, 2005. The stream channel assessment included a qualitative review of
channel characteristics (i.e., biological, hydrological, and geomorphological components) for the
purpose of documenting ephemeral (non jurisdictional) versus intermittent or perennial channels.
No perennial or intermittent stream channels were identified within the project study area.
2
Roanoke Rapids Day Use {Ve1/and Delineation
Roanoke Rapids Lake and Lake Gaston
AIACTEC Project no. 6470-06-1484
August 7, 2006
Summary'
MACTEC identified and delineated three wetlands at three different sites. The three delineated
wetland sites ranged in size from < 0.01 acres to 0.15 acres. No perennial or intermittent stream
channels were identified within the project site. Wetiand impacts exceeding 0.10-acre will
require a permit from the USACE.
MACTEC appreciates this chance to provide Dominion Resource Services, Inc. our services and
look forward to working with you in the future. Please contact Mr. Richard Harmon at (919)
831-8003 should you have any questions regarding this report.
Sincerely,
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, INC.
dauv-w??4
Lauren Saal
Staff Scientist
Attachment: Location Map
Delineation Map
RM Forms
gjj":?ff- Qit/1i'trYt
Richard G. Harmon
Principal Natural Resource Scientist
3
watlaad Deli atiew
xa..a: Rwid AAA Groton
Noah Caralma A Vrp m
Repwad / Date:
Ch=kad i Date
Pre wod For
R®OtIRM
DOMINION JVMACTEC
SEKVKMS
rtoi«x eaa"
Proles vwnky Map
^a
L,./"

jr Ir
I

Pry' r °, IM-W

."
Aw-
mw idi
LEGEND
1Roads
•.• Wetlands (GPS)
Wetland Area = < 0.02 acres
80 0 e0 100 F"
Scale: P= 125'
Wetland Delineation
Area 2: Lake Gaston Day Use
Halihx County, North Carolina
DOMINION
RESOURCES
SERVICFS

C3Wetland (GPS)
Wetland = < 0.01 acres
Fed
Scale: P= 125'
Wetland Delineation DOMINION
Area 8: Bank Fishing At Miles Creek RESOURCES
MecklenburCoup Virginia SERVICES
8 County, i 3/
Date:
Jurisdictional Waters
1998 Color Infrared Photon
2C
I
• '� '" „•' '`.,;' -rte •,,.
1,r•` , ti , '.. Y. -i +�• 1 � �, t 1 • •, t. i ,• ' . u y� t1 u• Jam. i_' J1, � � S * wAr - _.`
IN
rim
_ 1 _,,�•• I .4
`'•N
2.
S�•' I {}. c:_..:Ti:� ,.�� �1• :: c `a � Q •I yrs.
i. '•` "}.}, M. i Site , ,t
�� r.l � �•�F '1�P � 1 'til'"^•
rr , 1 •�
JI
t F'
�,5 " I i
d 4-
ti
'• f I SW" f �"-�r 1• 1f_ � .1 f•'r,. tom!-�
LEGEND
Q Wetlands (GPS)
Wetland Area = < 0.02 acres
250 0 250 Feet
Scale: I"=500' Prepared / Date:
Source: NCDOT, USGS (Roanoke RapidsTopographic Quadrangle) Checked / Date:
Prepared For: Prepared By.-
Wetland
y:Wetland Delineation DOMINION
Area 2: Lake Gaston Day Use RESOURCES �MACTEC Vicinity Map
Halifax County, North Carolina SERVICES
""'''" Project: 6470-06-1484 Figure 3B

jU'/ 7/
N
x
j/ C
1.
LL
\V
It
tl
G es For
Ekm t te
Rarn %
L
LEGEND P.
,a&3FIt
Wetland (GPS)
Wetland = <0.01 acres
250 0 250 Feet
Scale: V = 500' Prepared / Date:
Source: Radford University, USGS (Bracey & South Hill Topographic Quadrangles) Checked / Date:
Prepared For: Prepared By:
Wetland Delineation DOMINION
Area 8: Bank Fishing At Miles Creek RESOURCES A Vicinity Map
Mecklenburg County, Virginia SERVICES M AIC -)TEC
Project: 6470-06-1484 Figure 3C

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project! Site: ' u?''-=
Applicant/Owner:. c; - ,e
i v C.
Investigator: •' l a m u Date: c.
,1
Count: a'
State:_ N C.

Do normal circumstances exist on the site?
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)?
Is the area a potential problem area?
(explain on reverse if needed) Yes No
Yes No_,,X
Yes No_X_ Community ID:tl+
Transect ID:
Plot ID:
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. ,c ^t; r ? PAC_ 9.
2. I-b-i n eott r^ok tul.
T to,_ ?c'v F AC 4 10.
3. u _
t? kl +
11.
4. E .'k "1 vir ch' t 12.
5. e, c.` e 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAG). ;?! (L
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other undated
,/Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water:
Second ry Indicators:
"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: ? in
) Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12
. Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil: S([ F" in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name ) f
(Series and Phase):_11"I Et v I C 1k Drainage Class:

Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No,
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsoil Moist) (Munsell Moist) AbundancelContrast Structure, etc.

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor
^ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _.X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Within a Wetland? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes - No
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project I Site: ?r,(2. nQ ?2 t, a Ar"a )
-? Date:2 20G
Applicant I Owner: County:
Investigator: State:

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID:?F-
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No iY Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Strattim Indicator
1. 1,c o F& -w 9.
2. TYPd f'i')C 10.
3. Gnr tt?,? ???1-J 5LV E4CU 11-
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. is.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 3 /u
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other _ Inundated
_Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: At _(in.) Secondary Indicators:
/] Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
(stn.
Depth to Free Water in Pit: /,
) Water-Stained Leaves

Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: yL? ?, j {LLCM lr c>?( S eCC?u?? YC? I C??cc s?pv S
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Mansell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosot _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
-Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _ No X Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No _-;x Within a Wetland? Yes No4
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project! Site-EQ0- i hC C' Z Date: Zv 6?
Applicant! Owner: I- ' Y r County: aalrWK
Investigator: J2 , 6,t'Uilk
,
State:_

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes a No Community ID:(/),4
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No_•X_ Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No_'?_-? Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
C) c a ?- l S
_ 9.
061
2. ?iLa' -e_ R2?& 10.
3. 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). ? o
Remarks: 1 I
Pc, C p x ?3 5-Pc! c> T O?'Z• I y •S? i K F t uA
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other inundated
Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) ^ Water-Stained Leaves

4 _ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: /U 1
(in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes- No^
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist
( Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
//
/Ozz '
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes < No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Within a Wetland? Yes No_
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
ProjectI Site :C2?tn u Roorldo L T6 16"a
?? Pmt ?_
Date:.? Jt~ c?GG?
Applicant/ Owner: ) 0 c e' 6ey v ? County: t r .ti
Investigator: i State: A I C

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No
^' Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. 9.
2. 10.
3. 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-).
Remarks:
Al o ve3o W -, ; cf leu . arO?P -- ?? v l P4!4"") je+
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other _ Inundated
_Saturated in Upper 12"
_ No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil: >/-Z (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No?
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
__ I U 1 rZ
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_Reducing Conditions _Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: 1
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Within a Wetland? Yes_ No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(9987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project/ Site:L ' lrc ' FO A : A F e 0, Date: 2 -2-0 6
Applicant! Owners u u. - +
2
V County or
Investigator:
e 4v n?
1 State:
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes-ly_- No Community ID•
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No_,,y_ Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No--,X- Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. G
e4 1A AA -h-1111
T-h
9.
2 L? t -o" -?u ; i'' T,rP-e P: e h 10.
3 T-Ae (e) 11.
4._ ('.r ni is lt?? CQY-QRA;au• W ujy 1'hC 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). / U 6 ?o
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
- Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
_ Other _ Inundated
X _Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: A (in.)
Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: Wator-Stained Leaves

Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 cin.) _ Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes. No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
)
Horizon (M
uns
ell Moist) (
(iinches Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
??
??
?
?
51? [ 19
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
__Y
1- Moisture Regime
-Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Soils List
`Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ?C No Within a Wetland? Yes-Z- No____
Hydric Soils Present? YesC No
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project 1 Site: -c c '4 i : kt/a P. e2 6 Date: ! J al
Applicant/Owner: - .a '. ijllcq Tvtc. County: q
'
Investigator: T 114 State: /
d
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID&IA4
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. (.-1 -t N-d VA r -r-fpe s.
2.- 9,11P4 10.

41-+ e-'' •,vo -I-11C F 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-).
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
- Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
_ Other _ Inundated
-Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
4
Depth of Surface Water: 1
(in.) Secondary indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: /I/ (in.) Water-Stained Leaves

Depth to Saturated Soil: 2 2 (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: 100 p y 1 jAa ;/j v'Y 0 e C dto? -l y t
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No?
Profile Description;
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
s Horizon (M
st
uns
oi
)
(iinche
elll M (Munsell Moist, Abi,ndance/Contrast structure, etc.
e
/
se
?
is
t)
5
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Suifidic Odor ,Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
-
_ Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _ No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? YesNo,'
Remarks:
I of 1
Map center Is 36.47600N, 77.6718°W (WGS84/NAD83)
Roanoke Rapids quadrangle
Projection Is UTM Zone 18 NAD83 Datum
http://www.topozone.com/print.asp?z=18&n=4040061 &e=260628&s=200&size=l&u=5&layer=D... 8//2006
0 0.8 1.6 2.4 3.2 4 mi I
Site Sketches
Dominion Virginia Power, Dominion North Carolina Power, and Dominion Generation VENDOR N: 400013056
FOR INQUIRIES PLEASE CONTACT: CHECK NO: 245957
littp:/hvww.doni.coin/about/supply/aects_payable/index.jsp DATE: 08/18/2006
DOCUNIENTN: 2000011652
REM
2ENCE INVOICE NO. DATE PURCHASE
ORDER !/
GROSS AMOUNT
DEDUCTIONS
NET AMOUNT
?9 1000 DR08160620000 08/16/06 $200.00 $200.00
Certifica ion for Roanoke Rapids
2
0 0 6 1
X 6 1
t ?
RD L`•?? L! ?? ?
AU 2 2 Z006

vJc7LN?::... J SIC'R4i'r'J.' lick i3R',V .H
TOTALS $200.00 $200.00
Direct Pay Permits, if applicable:
NC #00148, WV #91-1-068258