20090080 Ver 1_More Info Received_20090710

LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP INC.
Environmental Consultants
July 10, 2009
TO: Mr. Kyle Barnes
NC Division of Water Quality
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
RE: Additional Information: Pamlico #12, 2,318 acres
Pamlico County, NC
DWQ Project 909-0080
Dear Kyle:
L!5@ 9 Da
JUL 1 3 2009
DENR - WAR QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMATER &UNC4
Thank you for your letter dated June 2, 2009 in which you request additional information regarding
the 401 Water Quality Certification application that was submitted for the Pamlico 12 Project. Below
is a response to each of your concerns.
1. Mitigation Plan
The DWQ has reviewed your application information and has determined that your mitigation plan
for the proposed impacts does not meet the DWQ requirements. The DWQ requires that mitigation
he implemented in a manner consistent with guidelines set forth in 15A NCAC 2H. 0506
Enclosed is a mitigation plan that proposes to remove an existing road and fill roadside ditches on
site. The mitigation activity will restore 4.7 acres of wet pine flat habitat. Please note that because of
comments received by DCM, the roadway design has slightly shifted and proposed impacts are now
3.79 acres of 404 wetlands, 0.08 acre of Zone 1 riparian buffer and 0.16 acre of Zone 2 riparian
buffer (see revised IP form). The proposed wetland mitigation is at a 1.24 to 1 ratio. Because riparian
buffer impacts are minimal, no buffer mitigation is proposed.
2. Road Design Specification
The application for the proposed impacts to wetlands lacked engineered design specification detail.
This design should include cross-sectional detail and culvert placement to maintain wetland
connectivity. Please provide this information.
Enclosed are engineered drawings of the proposed roadway. Please note that most of the roadway is
existing and was constructed under a Timber Management Plan exemption without engineered plans.
www.lmgroup.net • [e-mail] • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 15, Wilmington, NC 28403 • P.O. Box 2522, Wilmington, NC 28402
3. Neuse Riparian Buffer (NRB)
The only area identified as impacting the NRB is the area adjacent to the coastal wetlands crossing.
Both sites designated as "Proposed Cabin " on Figure 7 are in areas adjacent to coastal marsh. The
application provides little information detailing the development of those sites. Pleaseprovide aplat
of the project area indicating all of the NRB denoting both zones and the proposed development of
those sites (Lot size, clearing, impervious surface, piers, walkways, etc.)
Although the coastal wetland fine along Spring Creek has not been delineated, the proposed cabins
will be located greater than 50 feet from the 404 wetland line (see Figure 6). Therefore, no additional
impacts to NRBs outside of the roadway impact will occur. The applicant has not yet finalized
specific plans for the cabins. If any piers or docks will eventually be constructed within an AEC or a
riparian buffer, we will obtain prior regulatory approval.
4. Coastal Wetland Impacts
Please provide information that the Division of Coastal Management agrees with the project as
proposed and they are involved in the consistency determination.
Mr. Stephen Rynas of the Division of Coastal Management was provided a copy of the Individual
Permit application and has issued comments. Please note that the site plan has since been revised and
now proposes to completely avoid the coastal wetlands instead of bridging the area. Because of this
shift in the roadway, 404 wetland impacts have slightly increased to 3.79 acres.
5. Waste Water System
Please provide information that the Pamlico County Health Department has inspected the proposed
construction sites and has conveyed information that the sites are suitable for a wastewater system.
The applicant is currently working with the Pamlico County Health Department to obtain a
wastewater permit.
6. Utilities
Please provide information indicating how the applicant will provide utilities to the development
sites.
Utilities will be installed within the existing and/or proposed road rights of way, as depicted on Figure
6. No additional wetland impacts will be needed for utilities.
I hope this information adequately addresses your concerns. Please contact me ifyou have any
additional questions. Thank you for your assistance with this project.
Sincerely, `
Kim Williams
Environmental Scientist
Encl.
C: Ms. Tracey Wheeler, ACOE
Mr. Ian McMillan, DWQ
Mr. Stephen Rynas, DCM
Mr. Ken Williams
Mr. Bobby Billingsley, Thomas Engineering
r
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP INC.
Environmental Consultants
July 10, 2009
TO: Ms. Tracey Wheeler
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
2407 W. 5t' Street
Washington, NC 27889
RE: Additional Information: Pamlico #12, 2,318 acres
Pamlico County, NC
DWQ Project #09-0080
Dear Tracey:
Thank you for your letter dated June 2, 2009 in which you request additional information
regarding the 401 Water Quality Certification application that was submitted for the
Pamlico 12 Project. Below is a response to each of your concerns.
Review of your permit application indicates that a portion of the proposed impacts would
occur in coastal wetlands. Coastal Wetlands are designated Areas of Environmental
Concern under jurisdiction of the North Carolina Division of Coastal management
(NCDCM). Impacts to these areas would require a Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA) Major Permit. Based on this information, I am requesting that you withdraw
your application and resubmit the project to the Morehead City office of the NCDCMfor
processing. If your project plans are modified to avoid designated Areas of
Environmental Concern, I will be happy to process the modified project application.
Mr. David Moye of the Division of Coastal Management and Mr. Paul Farley of LMG
recently delineated the coastal wetlands in this area and determined that a small non-tidal
pocket existed adjacent to the proposed bridge location. Instead of constructing a bridge
over coastal wetlands, the proposed roadway alignment has been shifted to avoid this
Area of Environmental Concern. Therefore, a CAMA Major Permit is not needed.
Although total wetland impacts slightly increased to 3.79 acres, the avoidance of an AEC
is important. Please see the revised site plan drawings and IP form.
Addtionally, a mitigation plan is enclosed for your review. The mitigation plan proposes
to remove an existing road and fill roadside ditches on site. The mitigation activity will
restore 4.7 acres of wet pine flat habitat. The proposed wetland mitigation is at a 1.24 to
1 ratio.
www.lmgroup.net • [e-mail] • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 15, Wilmington, NC 28403 • P.O. Box 2522, Wilmington, NC 28402

I hope this information adequately addresses your concerns. Please contact me if you
have any additional questions. Thank you for your assistance with this project.
Sincerely,
Kim Williams
Environmental Scientist
Encl.
C: Mr. Kyle Barnes, DWQ
Mr. Ian McMillan, DWQ
Mr. Stephen Rynas, DCM
Mr. Ken Williams
Mr. Bobby Billingsley, Thomas Engineering
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP INC.
Environmental Consultants
July 10, 2009
TO: Mr. Stephen Rynas
Federal Consistency Coordinator
NC Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
RE: Additional Information: Pamlico #12, 2,318 acres
Pamlico County, NC
DCM 920090004
Mr. Rynas:
Thank you for your letter dated January 27, 2009 in which you determined that the previously
submitted permit application did not meet the information requirements of 15 CFR 930.58. Below is
a response to each of your concerns:
1. The graphic "Buffer Impacts" depicts that the proposed project would cross "DCM Flagged
Coastal Wetland (to be bridged) ". Additionally Page 6 of the "Pamlico 12 Tract Individual
Permit Application " states: "A bridge will be constructed to cross coastal wetlands along the
existing road in order to avoid impacts to tidally influenced area (Figures 8 & 9) ". This raises
the potential that the proposed project may require a CAW permit instead of a consistency
concurrence before the project can be initiated. Please contact Brad Connell at 252-808-2808
to evaluate this issue.
Mr. David Moye of the Division of Coastal Management and Mr. Paul Farley of LMG recently
delineated the coastal wetlands in this area and determined that a small non-tidal pocket existed
adjacent to the proposed bridge location. Instead of constructing a bridge over coastal wetlands, the
proposed roadway alignment has been shifted to avoid this Area of Environmental Concern
completely. Therefore, a CAMA Major Permit is not needed. Although total wetland impacts slightly
increased to 3.79 acres, the avoidance of an AEC is significant. Please see the revised site plan
drawings and IP form.
2. The submission package did not meet the requirements of Section 15 CFR 930.58 in that the
analysis required by 15 NCAC 07M. 0700 and 15 NCAC 07M. 0800 was not provided.
(a) Section 15 NCAC 07M. 0700 requires that adverse impacts to coastal lands and waters be
mitigated or minimized through proper planning and site selection. Page 6 of the "Pamlico
12 Tract Individual Permit Application " states: "To mitigate for the wetland impacts, the
applicant is evaluating several on-site restoration possibilities. " Please submit a mitigation
www.lmgroup.net • [e-mail] • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 15, Wilmington, NC 28403 9 P.O. Box 2522, Wilmington, NC 28402
plan. Additionally, this mitigation plan must discuss the issue that there is no reasonable
prudent alternate design or location for the project that would avoid the losses to be
mitigated
Enclosed is a mitigation plan that proposes to remove an existing road and fill roadside ditches on
site. The mitigation activity will restore 4.7 acres of wet pine flat habitat. The proposed wetland
mitigation is at a 1.24 to 1 ratio.
(b) The submitted alternatives analysis is inadequate. The alternative analysis merely asserts
that there would not be sufficient "room "for construction the 4,500 square foot structures.
Alternatives cannot simply be dismissed because they do not meet the Applicant's stated
goals. Wetlands are a known constraint and projects must be designed in compliance with
the legal requirements to first avoid wetlands and second to minimize impacts if avoidance is
not possible. Potential alternatives exist, such as making the structures smaller or using
what appear to be larger upland areas that are shown in graphic "Site Plan Overview ".
Please provide an alternative analysis that goes into greater detail.
As stated in the project narrative, the applicant plans to construct two hunting cabins that would
be used by the owners for recreational purposes. Other upland areas exist on site, but they contain
impoundments. Additionally, these uplands are located in the interior of the tract and the cabins
would not have views of the waterway. For these reasons, these sites were not considered
acceptable alternatives. Even if the proposed cabin size was reduced, these other upland areas
would not be suitable.
(c) Page 6 of the "Pamlico 12 Tract Individual Permit Application " notes that the Applicant
has previously preserved approximately 334.73 acres of wetlands. While the prior
preservation of these wetlands is admirable, a cursory review of the submission did not
identify how the preservation of these wetlands would be linked to the necessity to potentially
mitigate for the adverse wetland impacts proposed under this action. Should you wish to
have the preservation of 334.73 acres considered as potential mitigation for this proposed
project, please provide an analysis demonstrating how this would be acceptable.
The proposed on-site mitigation will restore 4.7 acres of wet pine flat habitat, which is a ratio of
1.24 to 1. Even without the preservation component, we believe the applicant far exceeds
standard regulatory mitigation requirements.
(d) Section 15 NCAC 07M. 0800 requires that water quality be protected. The submission notes
that water quality is an issue and that some of the waters in the project area are classified as
"NSW". Waters classified as "NSW" are nutrient sensitive. Please provide an analysis of
how the proposed project would be consistent with 15 NCAC 07M. 0800.
The project has been revised to avoid any Areas of Environmental Concern. In addition, the
applicant will use sediment and erosion control measures to avoid compromising the quality ofthe
surrounding waters.
2
(e) The submission notes that the project area is subject to the Neuse-Tar-Pamlico Buffer Rules.
The submission did not contain a graphic which clearly depicted whether the proposed
project would or would not be subject to the Neuse-Tar Pamlico Buffer Rules. Please
provide such a graphic. Additionally, please include any CAMA Area of Environmental
concern (AEC) boundaries.
Figure 7 defines the limits of the Neuse Riparian Buffers, which are measured from each of the
two flagged coastal wetland lines. The proposed road will impact 0.08 acre of Zone I buffer and
0.16 acre of Zone 2 buffer. Figures 6 and 7 show the limits of 404 wetlands and the nearest open
water areas. Although the normal high water line along Spring Creek has not been delineated, it
is obvious from aerial photographs that the proposed cabins will be located greater than 75 feet
from NHW and is outside of any AEC. Please note that David Moye of the Division of Coastal
Management has approved the flagged coastal wetland lines and has indicated that the new site
design will not require a CAMA permit.
()9 The submission notes that there is an existing road and that a new bridge would be
constructed. The submission, however, does not discuss whether any work would be done on
improving the road. For example, would the road be re graded, graveled, or paved? The
potential exists that this proposed project may require a grading and erosion control plan
approval and a stormwater management plan approval. Please provide an analysis on any
other State approvals that may be required for this proposed project.
The applicant may re-grade portions of the existing road. However, this work will stay within the
current limits of the roadway. The project engineer will examine the need for additional permits,
such as an Erosion Control Permit and/or a Stormwater Permit.
I hope this information adequately answers your concerns. Please contact me if you have any
additional questions. Thank you for your assistance with this project.
Sincerely, _
Kim Williams
Environmental Scientist
Encl.
C: Mr. Kyle Barnes, DWQ
Mr. Ian McMillan, DWQ
Ms. Tracey Wheeler, ACOE
Mr. Ken Williams
Mr. Bobby Billingsley, John Thomas Engineering
41
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
Privacy Act Statement
Authority: 33 USC 401, Section 10: 1413, Section 404. Principal Purpose: These laws require permits authorizing activities in, or affecting, navigable
waters of the United States, the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, and the transportation of dredged material for
the purpose of dumping it into ocean waters. Routing Uses: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating this application for a permit.
Disclosure; Disclosure of requested information is voluntary. If information is not provided however, the permit application cannot be processed nor
can a permit be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this
application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed
activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO. 12. FIELD OFFICE CODE 13. DATE RECEIVED 4. DATE APPL. COMPLETE
5. APPLICANTS NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENTS NAME AND TITLE (agent is not required)
Spring Creek Timber Company, LLC Land Management Group, Inc.
Attn: Ken Williams c/o Ms. Ashley Futral
6. APPLICANTS ADDRESS 9. AGENT=S ADDRESS
3313 Hwy 70 East P.O. Box 2522
New Bern, NC 28560 Wilmington, NC 28402
7. APPLICANT=S PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE 10. AGENT=S PHONE NO. W/AREA CODE
a. Residence N/A 910-452-0001 (phone)
b. Business [phone] 910-452-0060 (fax)
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BY APPLICANT)
11. STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
I hereby authorize Land Management Group, Inc. to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request,
supplemental information in support of this permit application.
Previously submitted
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE
NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE Pamlico #12 Tract
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable) 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
Spring Creek Tract #12 off of SR 1327 & 1328
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
COUNTY Pamlico STATE NC
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN: Parcel Number, L08-37
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE From Washington take Hwy 17 south to Hwy 33 south. Follow to Hwy 306 south
and take a left onto Hwy 55 south to Merritt. Take a left onto N Pamlico Road and follow to Straight Road.
Turn left onto Straight Road and follow to Old W hortonsville Road. Turn right onto W hortonsville Road and
follow through Whortonsville. The site will be the next right after Paradise Shore Road.
18. NATURE OF ACTIVITY (Description of project, include all features)
Spring Creek Timber Company, LLC proposes to convert an existing forestry road into an access road for a proposed cabin
to be built on pilings. The road has disturbed 2.70 acres of 404 wetlands. An additional 0.19 acre will be disturbed in order
to reach an upland island north of the existing road. Coastal wetlands have been avoided. This road will also impact 0.08
acre of Zone 1 riparian buffer and 0.16 acres of Zone 2 buffer. The applicant also proposes to construct another road that
will provide access to an additional upland island This road will impact 0.90 acres of 404 wetlands.
19. PROJECT PURPOSE (Describe the reason or purpose of the project)
The purpose of the project is to provide access to two separate upland islands on which hunting cabins will be built.
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. REASON(S) FOR DISCHARGE To construct roads and provide access to upland islands and the waterfront.
21. TYPE(S) OF MATERIAL BEING DISCHARGED AND THE AMOUNT OF EACH TYPE IN CUBIC YARDS
Discharge of clean, compacted sub-grade soil materials has already occurred for the existing road.
See Figures 6 and 7 for impact area.
22. SURFACE AREA IN ACRES OF WETLANDS OR OTHER WATERS FILLED
3.79 acres of 404 wetlands; .08 acre of Zone 1 riparian buffer, and 0.16 acre of Zone 2 riparian buffer
23. IS ANY PORTION OF THE WORK ALREADY COMPLETE? Yes IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
The existing road was constructed in 2006 for forestry management purposes.
24. ADDRESSES OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS, LESSEES, Etc., WHOSE PROPERTY ADJOINS THE WATERBODY
Previously submitted.
25. LIST OTHER CERTIFICATIONS OR APPROVALS/DENIALS RECEIVED FROM OTHER FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL
AGENCIES FOR WORK DESCRIBED IN THIS APPLICATION
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL' IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
N/A
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that
the information in this application is complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the
work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the applicant.
1 134
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE
18. U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly
and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or
representations o r makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry, shall
be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
' a N
o g °

d
_ z
'm
d' ? IL
O ?
m LL
N - ¢
Ql
m 3
U
J 3
J N
O 2
N U N
O
n
o
c
U ? N
E Y a
t6 N N
IL m
)
c
N
U U C N
?
d
a
EL ¢
• N
Q C ?
a. O N O
N ?p O
H ?
C4
N O
? ?
°
Uo

°T p
p
? h? CW7 ° m r m
¢ c?OZ o

° t
g c
o y
q ?
• ?aw Er
ii
or,

JJ*

i

J
U
N
y
Q Y
C
N
C

Cl)
O

N
?o '0 _
N
c cu

O
^
,
W

I
O N N ? .
M U 0)
O O c ?
p
v>
w m 'o (D
0) l .2
C N U n
N cn v O m
X N
W p 6
•?r
?J I..L U
co °N

a
m
v
Qrn i o
T
a
'
0
c
_0 a)
- E
NAt
«
? ?
• p p C?
Z
A ? ?
W N
> C

4?•• m N
E Z ma 3N
o N U Z 3
`
d' na Q v
? c
N 2
m
aNi ?
10 ?
E ?
m
LL
N
E
EL
0
U

E
m
aci
Y
N
O
_U
E
a
I
a
M
0
0
Lu
w
J
_
LL
r

w
EL
a
0
0
r

?
_ Lu
a
9
am6j
66£-40-10
:,egwnN qof
60OZIL 1/9
:aged uolslnaa
uav ? ..?
:Ae uMwd :ap!1
.OOZ=.1 Oil '00 J9gw!1 Neaajo 6updg
ales :;ueo!!ddV
MOM 1 Z L# 00! Iwed
area g0afad
NtK eull®aaO PON 'uo)6uIwIIM
U9Z x08 ao111O lsod
smollnsuoD 1n)udwu0""",
'Jill EM 9
J.N 31VH`9^V,N VLYAA[1IVV'I
tJ ??
spuEROM qOq
(saleMs eplspeoi 6ulpnloui) eplM;aa; qq
MOB 06•
(PEON posodOJd) }oedwl puegaM
(saleMs aplspew 6ulpnpui) apIm pal qq _
saJOE 697
(s;oedwl lewpippe
pue PEON 6uIIslx3) aoedwl puella
spueReM qOq
(6upslxa pue pasodoid) I ZDZ'££9'Z9Z
s;oedwl puellaM bob E999Z ON 'w08 WN
9L91 JaMeJO Od
sjaaw6u3 eu
spueldfl :/q paplnad a;ep A9Ajn
anms IIV
•a;nlosge aq o;;ueew;ou pue alewlxadde aJe sa6ewl
}aaj ajenbs 009q-
ulgeo pasodoi

.. . .' ':3'.SCllYK7lif
'.?.53tLaY'.BU.E
'.. ?..............
spueldn
spueRaM qOq
f
spueldn
(Aeped lned Aq pa66Eg)
au! I pueRaM Ie1seOO
(aAoyy plnea Aq pa66eg)
GUI-I PUE119M Ie1SEO!1
.
...
...
...
.
. ..................
.................
.................
.................
..................
.................
.......... ..
.................
....... ............
.............
.............
.............
............
.............
............
.............
............ ......
......
......
.....
.....
...
....
....
.....
. . . . . . . . .
........ . .
..

Proposed Road
Zone 2

Zone 1
3 ?
<a r
\ Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact

r

I

Zone 2
Zone 1
Uplands
®404 Wetland Impacts
- Neuse Buffer Zone 1
-0.08 acres
Neuse Buffer Zone 2
-0.16 acres
0 30 60 120
Project: Date: Revision Date:
I Images are approximate and not meant to be absolute. 12130i0e n2r2oos
All survey data provided by:
Carolina Engineers T A
LlYl Pamlico #12
Applicant: Scale: Job Number.
PO Drawer 1578
New Bern, NC 28563 LAND MANAGED9ENT GROUP-, .

environmental Consultants
Spring Creek Timber Co, LLC 1"=200' 01-04-344
252.633.2424
Past Office Box 2522
Title:
N
B
ff
d
Drawn By,
Figure:

?__ _ Wilmington, North Carolina 28402
Telephone: [phone] er an
euse
u
AEC Location Map ARF 7
PROP05 D
(EC)RM. EXI51ING)
-ROADWAYS
WHORTON5VILLE
ROAD (5R 13 2 7)
OVERALL SITE
BOUNDARY
OWNER/DEVELOPER_
SPRING CREEK LAND ?- TIMBER. LLC
3313 US HIGHWAY 70 EAST
NEW BERN, NC 285GO
1?ti1lIlIIIfl?ff
.?`'?yGINF?''?•.
1
,tit `?IIIIli1!!7!, ,?? l?I
0
=?Z C
r rr ?
r rr, ?
?I ri t t 6
if ? ? 11ti
,rff>>I r rlilarl l >>,`t
%%% ?L lrr
7
a?
o
COVER
ROADWAY SECTION PLAN5 for
SPRING CREEK
P k 2 PAMLICO COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
THOMAS ENGINEERING, PA
('IV11, LN(:INTPRIN(;•LAND 131?'VELOP\fI4=*I'RO.IECT NIANA(11CAfli-NT
I'. O. BOX 1309, NF.\A" BERN, _NC, 28563
11'"7'V1'.TI{0'%IASEN(,INEERINGPA.CO'%i
OFF: 252.637.2727 FAX: [phone]
1 SCALE: 1 ":5000' 1 DATE: 7.13,09 1
PROJECT #: 2000-0I 8
SHEET: I of G
VICINITY MAP
I "= 5000'
GENERAL NOTES
I . THESE PLANS ARE MEANT TO SUPPLEMENT PLANS PREPARED BY LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. WITH
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: PROJECT: PAMLICO # 12, JOB NUMBER 01-04-344, ORIGINAL DATE
12-30-08.
2. THESE PLANS ADDRESS IMPACTS TO WETLAND PORTIONS OF THE PPIOP05ED PROJECT ONLY AND DO NOT
ATTEMPT TO ADDRESS IMPACTS TO UPLAND REGIONS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT.
3. AERIAL IMAGES AND 501L MAPPING AS SHOWN HEREIN WERE PROVIDED BY LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP,
INC. AND SHOULD BE USED FOR CONCEPTUAL PURPOSES ONLY.
4. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION INCLUDED HEREIN 15 FROM DATA PROVIDED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA
FLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM.
5. GRADE AND STORM DRAIN ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREIN ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE TO BE FIELD
VERIFIED.
G. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DISCOVERY OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND INSTALLATIONS, IN
ADVANCE OF EXCAVATING, BY CONTACTING ALL LOCAL UTILITIES AND BY PROSPECTING.
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE EXTREME CAUTION WHEN WORKING AROUND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AND
SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT DISRUPTION OF SERVICES TO CUSTOMERS.
8. ALL SEEDED AREAS WILL BE FERTILIZED, RESEEDED AS NECESSARY, AND MULCHED ACCORDING TO
SPECIFICATIONS IN THE VEGETATIVE PLAN TO MAINTAIN A VIGOROUS, DENSE VEGETATIVE COVER.
9. THE WORK AREA SHALL BE GRADED, SHAPED, AND OTHERWISE DRAINED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO
MINIMIZE SOIL EROSION AND SILTATION OF DRAINAGE CHANNELS, DAMAGE TO EXISTING VEGETATION,
AND DAMAGE TO PROPERTY OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF THE WORK AREA.
10. TEMPORARY SILT FENCE LOCATIONS ARE TO BE DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER THROUGH ON SITE
INVESTIGATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
1 1 . PROVIDE A PERMANENT GROUND COVER ON EXPOSED SLOPES WITHIN 21 CALENDAR DAYS FOLLWOWING
THE COMPLETION OF GRADING.
COPYRIGHT © 2009 BY THOMAS ENGINEERING, P.A.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THESE DRAWINGS ARE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND AS SUCH REMAIN THE PROPERTY
OF THOMAS ENGINEERING, P.A. NEITHER THI5 DOCUMENT NOR ANY PART OF TH15 DOCUMENT MAY BE REUSED,
REPRODUCED, OR TRANSMITTED IN ANY FORM OR BY ANY MEANS, ELECTRONIC OR MECHANICAL, INCLUDING BY
NOT LIMITED TO PHOTOCOPYING, MICROFILMING AND RECORDING, OR BY ANY INFORMATION STORAGE AND
RETRIEVAL SYSTEM, WITHOUT PERMISSION 15 WRITING FROM THOMAS ENGINEERING, P.A.
f
``'?j1GIN 11j11''
C
1
,r1r 'f7rrrl}rQi5 ?3
?Illnnt1111?
> > IIII
tip` $ ''fJ
o? f
- Q$ AL
147
NOTES
ROADWAY SECTION PLANS for
SPRING CREEK
N 2 PAMLICO COUNTY NORTH CAROLIP A
THOMAS ENGINEERING, PA
CIVIL ENGINJ:ERING*LA- D DL'VELOP%fE\1'•PI20.JE('T 11ANA(;lii\17]N'I'
P. O. Box 1309, New Bern, NC, 28563
www.ThomasEngineeringPA.com
Ofl 252.637.2727 Fax: 252,636.2448
SCALE: N.T.S.
PROJECT #: 2006-018
DATE: 7. 13.09
SHEET: 2 of G
GRAPIIIC SCALE
HN
? o00 o I o0o Uplands - \ \
Coastal Wetlands -- 1?
Uplands
Coastal Wetland -'f HN /
f1
-' / C5 5m
Uplands -
%.
Sk
404 Wetlands 404 Wetlands
y _
Existing Roadway Impacts
2.89 ac
(to be improved)
AIL \lA. ?
Uplands
Proposed Roadway Impacts
?J
II h1 404 Wetlands 0,90 ac
v
Ex. Roads
n`.
`,?',IIIIilllillfl!
`%?•? GIN Irr AERIALS 501 L5
ROADWAY 5ECTION PLANS for
"roc =9~
SPRING CREEK
I 1
llrr !,, r+ l,, ???
rrrf4 1 I I*?????? TOWN5HIP k 2 PAMLICO COUNTY NOP.TN CAROLINA
`,` I II I It11rI
??t RoL rrr THORZAS ENGINEERING, PA
O` IQ?+i? r f'TFIT. E GTVPERTNG.T.AND DPVRLOPAII:NT.PROJECT HA\AG[+NIENT
c ,.
~ AL 9?' _ P. O. BOX 1309, NI'1V BPIZN, NC', 28563
10147 = ?v«??'.mII(7?L•?5ri`GINrrlZ[\tzPa.coai
++' ? ci":'' OFF: 252.637.2727 PAX: 232.636.2448
I N"
rlt?' GI SCALE: I 1000' DATE: 7. 1 3.09
PROJECT #: 2006-018 SHEET: 3 of 6
{ Upland5
y
Coastal Wetlands
Coastal Wetland
404 Wetlands
f
r '"?- ...
Proposed Roadway Impacts
0.90 ac
Exi5tii'1Gg Roadway Impacts
2.89 ac
(to be improved)
-' .4
Y
y? , - '• 404 Wetlands ,. '?.
N
1-..W`. r rid ?......' ?.
(dote: Corrugated Plastic Pipe (CPP), for wetland equalization.
are representative only and do not depict actual lencgths.
GRAPHIC SCALE
800 O 800
jIIII17227rI.,
r rJr? ?
?71i?1 ?,
t,?,
1`?,,??fl„ ! jlfr
' ? r r
10147
rlfp ......... •0 ?,??
Topographic Elevatlon5
Number Min. Elev. Max. Elev. Color
1 -2.4' 0.5' j;
2 0.5' 0.9'
3 0.9'
4 1.11
5 1.3' 1.5'
G 1.5' 1.7'
7 17 1.01
8 1,91 2. 1'
9 2.1' 2.5'
10 2.5' 5.2'

Ex. ROIC15 -/
ROADWAY PLAN t- TOPOLOGY
ROADWAY SECTION PLANS for
SPRING CREEK
IP # 2
nd5
PAMLICO COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
THOMAS ENGINEERING, PA
CIVIL E'\(',INEI;RI-NG*LAND DE\'E],C)I'Nfl,NT&PRO.IE("1`',IANAGENIF.NT
11. O. BOX 1301), Nh W BE12N, N(', 2856:3
1\'\\'\\'.`1'IIO?IASENI:INl:1.RIN(;I'A.(?O?i
OFF: 252.037.2"727 PAX: 25:2.636.2448
SCALE: 1 ":800'
PROJECT #: 2006-018
DATE: 7. 1 3.09
5HEET: 4 of 6
FULLY STABILIZED TYPICAL 5ECTION FULLY 51 ABILIZtU
PSRM WHERE NECESSARY PSRM WHERE NECESSARY
(APPLIES TO ALL ROADS)
FULLY STABILIZED
PSRM WHERE NECESSARY
`1 ,771771c7i11t ,rjl, {,
r,rr t? 77 * ti?~`
,4 1 no
t,fr r
¢Io
,ti?O a t1t7q??Lf?rrl•-
T '
llr'r. 9
Y'om'
- L -
10147 - =
''CrO? f`rt!l771711t11777? O?t?``
Gl I I1? t11,1
SECTION A-A
(TYPICAL PIPE CR055ING)
1011 f. ALAI r(17/FD
FULLY STABILIZED
PSRM WHERE NECESSARY
TYPICAL SECTIONS
ROADWAY SECTION PLANS for
SPRING CREEK
# 2 PAMLICO COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
THOMAS ETA' Gr INEEIZING , PA
(11\111 I.N(;1NIa.R1NG*LAND DH;VELOP,iENT*PROJECT MANA6R'M.NT
P. 0. BOX 1309, NEW BERN, N(', 2$363
\V\VNN7.TH0IIASENGINICERINGPA.(`.O\1
01-IF: 252.637.2727 PAX: 2:12.6.16.2448
SCALE: N.T.S. I DATE: 7.13.09
PROJECT #: 2006-018
SHEET: 5 of 6
GENERAL NOTES:
TOP 5TK AND
10 GAUGE MIN. I WIRE SHALL BE A MINIMUM Of 32" IN
WIDTH A14D SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF G
LINE WIP.E5
12-1/2 GAUGE MIN. LINE WIRE5 WITH 12" STAY SPACING.
BOTTOM 5TRAND 2. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE A MINIMUM
10 GAUGE MIN. Of 30 IN WIDTH AND SHALL BE FASTENED
ADEQUATELY TO THE WIRE AS DIRECTED
BY THE ENGINEER.
3. STEEL POSTS SHALL BE 5' IN HEIGHT
AND SHALL BE Of THE SELF-FASTENER
ANGLE STEEL TYPE.
4. WOOD POSTS SHALL BE A MINIMUM
Of G' IN HEIGHT AND 3" OR MORE IN
DIAMETER.. VdIRE FABRIC SHALL BE
FASTENED TO WOOD P05T5 WITH NOT
LE55 THAN #5 %AlIRE STAPLES 1-112' LONG.
Y 51 LT FENCE
ROADWAY * EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
SECTION
PLAN
DETAIL EC2 - PIPE OUTLET PROTECTION
,,i`1111tai it f?`!!!
???? .?1GINE? '!,!
S
o C
C A1? 0
f !i-
WAL
a i1 7
IN
`'''•G+?A ,Uri.?'`O
!!!Il 111111 A 1 1,1
La
? ----I` t 1 z'>
n _
.451
------------------- -
J0 8"j A-A fILTER BLANKET
GENERAL NOTE5
I . La 15 THE LENGTH Of THE RIPRAP APRON.
2. J= 1.5 TIMES THE MAXIMUM 5TONE DIAMETER BUT
NOT LE55 THAN G".
3. 114 A WELL-DEFINED CHANNEL EXTEND THE APRON
UP THE CHANNEL BANKS TO AN ELEVATION OF G"
ABOVE THE IvWIMUM TAILWATER DEPTH OR TO THE
TOP Of THE BANK, WHICHEVER 15 LESS.
4.A FILTER BLANKET OR FILTER. FABRIC SHOULD BE
INSTALLED BETWEEN THE RIPRAP AND SOIL FOUN-
DATIOIJ.
ROADWAY SECTION PLANS for
SPRING CREEK
TOWNSHIP # 2
PAMLICO COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA I
THOMAS ENGINEERING, PA
C'I\'IL ENC. lNIERRING*LAND DEVI>.LOPME-NT.PPOJI:CT MANAGE\(ENT
P. O. BOX 1:309, NE11' BERN. NC, 28563
N171i'\1'.TFIO.NIASENC 1N I;.EI2ING3'A.CO\I
OFF: 352.037.2727 FAX: 252. (93(1.2448
SCALE: N.T.5.
PROJECT #: 2006-015
DATE: 7. 1 3.09
51EET: G of G
VAP.IE5 A5 DIRECTED BY ENGINEER
"PAMLICO 12 TRACT"
WETLAND RESTORATION PLAN
RESTORATION OF ROAD #7
Prepared By:
Land Management Group, Inc.
PO Box 2522
Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone. [phone]
Fax. [phone]
AI?LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP INC.
vialliPw Environmental Consultants
Prepared For:
Spring Creek Timber Company, LLC
Attn: Ken Williams
3313 Hwy 70 East
New Bern, NC 28560
July 2009
WETLAND RESTORATION PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ................................................. .............................................................1
Background ........................................................ ............................................................. I
Pre-restoration Site Conditions .......................... ............................................................. I
Wetland Classification and Functions ............... .............................................................2
Soils .................................................................... .............................................................2
Vegetation Community ...................................... .............................................................3
Prior Anthropogenic Impacts ............................. .........................
Adjacent Land Use ............................................. .............................................................3
RESTORATION ................................................... .............................................................3
Physical Restoration Plan .................................. .............................................................3
MONITORING PLAN ......................................... .............................................................4
Annual Report Schedule .................................... .............................................................4
Restoration Monitoring ...................................... .............................................................5
CONTINGENCY PLAN .................................................................................................... I
RESTORATION IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE ..................................................6
SUMMARY ...............................................................................................................
TABLES
1. PROPOSED SPECIES LIST FOR WETLAND RESTORATION OF
ROAD #7, PAMLICO #12
FIGURES
1. VICINITY MAP
2. USGS TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE
3. NRCS SOIL SURVEY
4. NAPP AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
5. MITIGATION PLAN OVERVIEW
6
i
Pamlico #12
Wetland Restoration Plan
Restoration of Road #7
Introduction
I. Background
In 2006, Spring Creek Timber Company, LLC, constructed a forestry road within
the Pamlico #12 tract and impacted 2.7 acres of 404 wetland habitat. Because the road
was constructed under a forestry plan and because best management practices were
utilized, they were exempt from 404/401 permitting and mitigation requirements.
However, Spring Creek Timber Company, LLC has proposed to change the primary use
of the road from forestry to an access road for a hunting cabin. In addition, they wish to
construct another road for recreational purposes. Because impacts are no longer related
solely for the purpose of timber management, the road is subject to the "recapture clause"
of section 404(f) wetland guidelines. Section 404/401 permits and adequate mitigation
are necessary. Total impacts are to 3.79 acres of 404 wetlands. The applicant has
submitted an Individual Permit application to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, NC
Division of Water Quality, and NC Division of Coastal Management.
This restoration plan proposes removing an existing forestry road (Road #7),
filling adjacent ditches, and planting the restored area with native wetland species. This
will restore approximately 4.7 acres of wetlands. Monitoring of the project will take place
for three years following the restoration activities to determine overall project success.
IL Pre-restoration Site Conditions
The tract is located off of Whortonsville Road in Pamlico County, adjacent to
Spring Creek (Figure 1). Several creeks form boundaries of the tract. Broad Creek and
two of its tributaries (Pittman Creek and Green Creek) form portions of the tract's
southern boundary and Spring Creek and Long Creek form its northern boundary.
Additionally, Burton Creek and the tip of Green Creek extend into the southern part of
the site.
1
The site is comprised of a pine plantation that was started by Weyerhaeuser
Company several decades ago. There are several dirt logging roads located throughout
the tract, most are approximately 20' wide. Surrounding land use currently consists of
undeveloped silvicultural land or other pine plantations (Figure 4).
III. Wetland Classification and Functions
Much of the southeastern North Carolina coastal plain, including this tract, is
underlain by an extensive Pleistocene marine terrace that is flat and poorly to very poorly
drained. Saturated conditions produced by this terrace have driven the development of
hydric soils and large interstream divide wetlands. Many of these wetland ecosystems
are classified hydrogeomorphically as flats. These ecosystems receive precipitation as
their sole water source and lose water primarily by evapotranspiration with overland flow
and gradual seepage to the underlying aquifer. Soils of wet flats can be either histosol or
mineral. Flats with organic soil are dominated by bay type vegetation(e.g. Magnolia
virginiana, Persea borbonia, Ilex spp., Lyonia spp.) while mineral soil flats tend to be
dominated by pine species (e.g. Pinus taeda).
Restoration at the Pamlico #12 tract will re-establish 4.7 acres of non-riverine
wet pine and mixed hardwood flat forest habitat to replace the wetlands that were
impacted from the construction of a road. The goal is to provide for functional
restoration via re-establishment of characteristic hydrology and vegetative assemblages.
By re-establishing these criteria, wetland functions such as nutrient cycling and removal,
sediment retention, and water storage will be realized on the tract. In addition to the
restoration, there will be 3.3 acres of wetland enhancement.
IV. soil
The soils of the project area are mostly comprised of the Stockade soil series
(Figure 3). These soils are very poorly drained and possess a clay layer from 11 inches to
36 inches which is restrictive to percolation of precipitation into surrounding surficial
aquifers. The drainage restrictions present in these soils allow them to retain wetland
2
hydrology almost year round through the retention of precipitation and without any
additional input from surrounding stream systems.
V. Vegetation Community
Prior to mechanized impacts, uplands supported mostly planted loblolly pine
(Pinus taeda) with scattered sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) and red maple (Ater
rubrum). Wetlands supported loblolly pine, pond pine (Pinus serotina), red maple, wax
myrtle (Morella cerifera), and red bay (Persea borbonia). These species are indicative of
the non-riverine wet pine and mixed hardwood flat forest habitat.
VL Prior Anthropogenic Impacts
Several thousand linear feet of a forest road system and concurrent ditches are
currently in place. These roads and ditches are not in violation of standards set by DWQ
or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. These features provide site access for forestry
applications.
VII. Adjacent Land Use
The land use in the surrounding area consists of undeveloped land or other pine
plantations. There is no residential or commercial development in the vicinity of the
project area.
Restoration
I. Physical Restoration Plan
Restoration activities at the Pamlico #12 tract will restore a total of 4.7 acres of
hardwood/pine flat (Figure 5). At present, the existing fill road measures 30' in width
and has two borrow ditches on either side. These ditches currently have a lateral effect to
drain up to 35' adjacent to their position. Restoration of Road #7 will commence with
the removal of all fill material and grading to original contours, which will directly
restore 1.4 acres of wetlands. The plan calls for the filling of the two lateral ditches with
slightly raised berms at the low end to prevent coastal/estuarine waters from overland
3
flow and reaching the planted seedlings during high spring and wind tide events.
Because of the 35' lateral drainage effect of the ditches, their filling will result in 3.3
acres of wetland restoration. It is anticipated that another 3-4 acres of adjacent wetland
will be enhanced.
Typical non-riverine wet hardwood forest vegetation such as swamp chestnut
oak (Quercus michauxii), laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), and black gum (Nyssa
sylvatica) will be planted along with shrubs such as wax myrtle (Morella cerifera), red
bay (Pei-sea palustrus) and pond pine (Pinus serotina). The typical shrub vegetation will
mimic vegetation already found on site. Planting of the species will occur during the
dormant season (Winter 2010).
The table below lists the available species for planting. The total represents a
planting density of 500 stems per acre, which achieves the project objectives and allows
for considerable seedling mortality.
Table 1: Proposed Species List for Wetland Restoration of Road #7, Pamlico #12
Common Name Scientific Name Quantity
Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 400
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii 500
Black Gum Nyssa sylvatica 400
Pond Pine Pinus serotina 500
Wax Myrtle Morella cerifera 400
Red Bay Persea palustris 200
Total 2,400 1
Monitoring Plan
I. Annual Report Schedule
All restoration monitoring will be conducted for three years or until deemed
successful, whichever is longer. Annual reports will be submitted to the USACE and
DWQ no later than September 301'' of the following year. Each report will include a
narrative summarizing the findings of the monitoring. Vegetative and hydrologic data
4
will also be included to document conditions of the restored area over the course of the
year. Photographs will be incorporated to illustrate the evolution of site soil and
vegetative communities.
H. Restoration Monitoring
Hydrologic Monitoring
Filling of ditches in wetlands precludes the necessity of hydrologic monitoring as
it removes the transport mechanism for the existing water volume causing retention times
to increase within the area. The two ditches that were dug displaced small amounts of
water due to the shallow depth and narrow channel width.
In order to demonstrate the restored hydrology, two shallow automated
groundwater monitoring wells will be installed as shown in Figure 5. One of these wells
will be located perpendicular to the existing ditches to document hydrologic activity in
both wetland and upland habitats. The second will be installed in a non-impacted area.
Groundwater levels will be recorded daily. The success criterion will be the
establishment and maintenance of a static water table which closely mirrors the levels
recorded in the reference well.
Vegetation Monitoring
While the primary success criterion for the restoration will be based on
hydrology, vegetation community development will also be monitored. A vegetation
monitoring study will include three 0.10-acre circular plots, which will be randomly
selected throughout the restored area. The number of acceptable volunteer species and
planted individuals will be quantified. Overall, survivorship must meet or exceed 320
stems per acre by the end of the monitoring period for the project to be deemed
successful.
Contingency Plan
In the event that the hydrology and vegetation success criteria are not fulfilled, a
contingency plan will be implemented. The contingency plan will require consultation
5
with all regulatory agencies if success is not achieved during the monitoring period.
Sample contingency measures may include selective re-grading or replanting.
Recommendations for further activities will be implemented and monitored until the
hydrology and vegetation accurately represent the reference site and meet or exceed
regulatory statutes.
Restoration Implementation Schedule
Groundwater monitoring will commence in mid-October 2009 in the vicinity of
the project area. Restoration planting will commence in the winter of 2010 pending the
approval of this plan. Monitoring of the restoration site will begin after the earth work
and plantings are complete and will continue for the duration of the project. Earth work
and plantings will take place throughout the winter of 2009 and spring of 2010. Annual
vegetation monitoring will be conducted in the spring of each year following planting and
will continue until deemed successful by the USACE.
Summary
A 4.7 acre restoration plan of Road #7 is proposed as remediation for the 3.79
acres of wetland impacts from new access roads. The plan will provide for a functional
restoration via re-establishment of characteristic hydroperiod and vegetative
communities. Earth work will restore contours to their original grades and 2,400 stems
will be planted. The target stem density (for planted and characteristic volunteer species)
will be 320 stems/acre by the completion of the last year of monitoring. It is anticipated
that the native seed bank within the ditch spoil piles and stripping windrows will
germinate via seed and sucker sprouts once this material is spread over top of the
regraded areas. If the target species diversity and density are not met, contingency plans
will be developed in conjunction with NCDENR and USACOE, ensuring a successful
restoration project.
6
! ';.rr.?t• uTf
~`,? t ??E'dlr.'tcJ' ,fDG'i;rtE
V5•'r.r ti` t>`" r -'-tirvE- '1 rE+ F'a:itr;
.. fti_ .... .
'Ilk
tt
? _t_--- j 8 lnri•rX?.s : ,fit,
k itigation Area
r? It
{}
v I w E
I ?? '''4 '1_ i W4HrrU?rs??.•il?. .. r-- f''•'rP1sf -
ti ,. , f r f;afjflry HffN
SCI' _ ;
• y i i
,. j; ?
NC Atlas & Gazetter, 2003, pages 67 & 79
Images are approximate and not meant to be absolute.
All survey data provided by:
Carolina Engineers
PO Drawer 1578
New Bem, NC 28563
252.633.2424
?LMG
p LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP mc.
Environmental Consultants
Post Office Box 2522
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402
Project: Date: Revision Date:
Pamlico #12 12/30/08 4/22/2009
Applicant: Scale: Job Number.
Spring Creek Timber Co, LLC 1=1 Mile 01-154-344
Fide: Drawn By., Figure:
Vicinity Map ARF 1
x''11 .. -5-r-" •.. - _ yy __? J 1+.?.M RORNVR BAY 1?1• ? -'i.
'iZ
I _-
?`??
1 "'vim' ?' ??- J /'T' I• •:?; I J
L7 4?-? I'.
tga#?an Area
-u ?..:T
FL- S&
X. 31M M
t
r r J'iy t.
r ?r .? . I 40/$ H I. n2'? 0 L c' Oi.
r kw?,c-'?-'11?'?z?r •-``1'-"•p
+,?I i??.;.-?yl\1 •Z?f tyet?}? \ ??3?? rr ?S •r ??,?.?y G?ft,? ? 4
r c; 1 / N+ed,r, -) Ja?.M... c.u. Crsrk cote Pmnt
.?,-M (` IWernoN slate Pv+rt /
71 t. •. 7i
(t r --- rJ ? 1?~ l ??Aulae PtE ? ;?. ?1?? BROAA f?. '•?..? ?\
Broad
ape.
c' 1 r f /,tf
7.1''1 ,i
USGS 7.5 minute topographic map, Jones Bay & Broad Creek Quadrangles
Images are approximate and not meant to be absolute.
All survey data provided by: Project: Date: Revision Date:
Carolina Engineers
PO Drawer 1,578 LM G Pamlico #12 12/30108 4/22/2009
New Bem, NC 285 8563 Applicant: Scale: Job Number.
252.633.2424 LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP wc, Spring Creek Timber CO, LLC 1•=4000' 01-04344
Environmental Consultants
Post Office Box 2522 Title: Drawn By. Figure:
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 USGS Topographic Map ARF 2
Tele hone: 910-452-0001 Jones Bay Quadrangle
L.:IPERMITS2004 PERMIT FILES\01-04-344 --- Pamlico 12. Ken Williams\CAD\Pam12 Fiaures mitioation.dwo
? F, -?

Images are approximate and not meant to be absolute.
All survey data provided by:
Carolina Engineers
PO Drawer 1578
New Bem, NC 28563
252.633.2424
.ft

GIS based NRCS soil survey, Pamlico County
Project: Date: Revision Date:
LM G Pamlico #12 12/30/08 4122/2009
Applicant: Scale: Job Number.
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP INC. Spring Creek Timber Co, LLC 1'-2000 01-04-344
Environmental Consultants
Post Office Box 2522 Title: Drawn By: Figure:
Imington, North Carolina 28402 NRCS Soils ARF 3

N or.
;:..-? ?.r?r tr'fii•.: ~?+ K'_ ?r. : L? ,. y?'i ? tom. '?''???r ? ?1y'??? •?.t
Q `,-S ?'Y• v' ^ ? t:. }! %! r ?? i )F !„?, ,_ ?. r I?w /atd y r r°.C) iy!''k%,
'Pi r
E`?- •?,?Re"J ???YS - _ 1'2/ (- IJr f.f ??r ? ..`.;"?Xp? R:__ C .r"`K? Y
ke, ? w t 2/ 't?? F.,;r• ?y -? .? f..r"ff•,t?j "3'-.' t ??. "4.. {. ;?+._..?r'..
... t iY J1?[?.?r. - y- ?'??? h.- - ' .r 4 ? d2/.: ? p. ?WS ., 7?."1 - /"y,alT.}- ???1` , . f ?•\ . i
- ?1 ? ..2/M' ?, • I.Mt n y _*`? 3 ?'?,Mt M ;i? ?.. ++ '+E. ?
` r - ?!F'???"?" ? ?' ? 1?' +?. % w 2/j - •'{??+
4? - '+, ti ,? +?fir+?C's •?! '• `?'` }s w-~'1 5 f ?Ft'y ,t! f _ F".,q.?r"..
/,: w-.? _ ? ? .yam r`a? _ ,? ?S >,Jf,.,,r y I ?' ? ? s 9 ? r
?''''•-''?
r'rt?.'ir?;'? '?•..; - Y 7YS'" ti"4 it ''+ _ 5 .? \, r?• ,ift
arc,
oll
%
rr
40 9
e
4r, T'
fi? - Y .. ? ""l YJy? ? M-?j'Ir+ •, ??"7'l` v ` +s . ..y,?? .. -,• -1-1i
• 2/(I' / t'. ,l * `'VY •}y. '. }? t.•1 } T -J.7? ) {,..: / ?j[
'P,? •tw S#?) .T , `" `7? 'l lfL,y, r"} ~ ?.'K V )L? .i ti .-_ •? .r iy'ry.c?- Y7
r-. ,y. - r' ' .?., ? ' ??' ' ?- , "' t - tl "[ ?:??"° r it '`?1, _' , L r fir. /',?
t ? `t •:, ? ?, „}?''?c?. t. ,' ? T ?t, ?..\?,S ` ` ,: L ? r ii : tit' ? Y,JM . H ?t+t : c,ny r r;;
?r ; . ?k .. ti ? a t,? .. .? ? ? r .??-,.^,y-tth?cs` \T` ;; ?, e ? ? J . _ •?"x?w Nv h ., S•
•gr!t. '?p••ti ,.; •4 ^?._ Jr- : w C . f, ° ?. ?? 4?2 ti;? f } ." ?.iu }??rr`.r ?'?'!F'c r tK'tL
s.':SYr?+ "?Ff,'.. s •,• -., d; .?ti -r,7i-\?n.
r ? r2/
r.`2/• ,rt•?'-. ? f ?l ? r? _ ..;??_ _
fly
rr °".,r 1t 2/`t "c / ,?/ J rr 1 2
r;+. w `'y 1dS r ?y+?'4 2/2 ?s' r Sit J r ?
':1. \, ?i §Ty 2/a, l? y• t^- 1'a'? ?` ,
.14
%
[, `???• ? .w! • ? E •-'•!?. ? `fit O' _
_?` t tr ' tit ,rr ? ?. ?• r .'? v.?r.: ? ?'?'-__.
ref r r F? x'?' . T ?y, •,,, ; ','>,?•
'its
r?-- i ? ?t`?? -.- , '?! •y' ,?, ? . ?? 2/t ^?. Y,
,, d, :1 ,i2/._.,; 1\ ; li<,' J• '., ;•
.
. lily,
fie. 5 1 _ f \ ? • [? s ? [ N R 7?. ? ors of
'-
w
1998 NAPP aerial photography
Images are approximate and not meant to be absolute.
All survey data provided by: Project: Date: Revision Date:
Carolina Engineers
PO Drawer 1578 LM G Pamlico #12 12/30/08 4122/2009
New Bem, 285 8563 Applicant: Scale: Job Number.
252.633.2 .2424 LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP rnc. 1 =2009 01-04-344
Environmental Consultants Spring Creek Timber Co, LLC
Post Office Box 2522 Title: Drawn By: Figure:
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 Aerial Photography ARF 4
Tele hone:910-452-0001
L:\PERMITS\2004 PERMIT FILES101-04-344 --- Pamlico 12. Ken Williams\CAD\Pam12 Fioures mitieation.dwo

ry ?-? ?r
1? A "t \
? V
'`K y
•
r
,JA
. a`' >
Project: Date:
Pamlico #12
Applicant: scale:
Spring Creek Timber Co, LLC
* \ E «
ore
K ??# ? ' ? °' ? ? to •'-? ?
k N?k\
w
Awl * ? ?. t'om'. ? ? ?; ,,,?' ''" ,?;
41-0
t tt ?s p t?f.
.10 3e ?r 16 S 461
"'"# `

9 at -.
,.* 4
1998 NAPP aerial photography
Images are approximate and not meant to be absolute.
All survey data provided by:
Carolina Engineers
PO Drawer 1578

New Bem, NC 285 8563
LM G
252.633.2424 LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP uc.
Environmental Consultants
Post Office Box 2522
Wil
i
N

APFRMITSt9004 PFRMIT FII FS\n1-nA-Side --- Pte, ii- 19 m
ngton,
orth Carolina 28402
Tele hone:910-452-0001
Kun 1A1i11i ,wren%D-A0 c-- ..,?x..?e..., a..._
12/30/08 I 4122/2009
1"=300' 1 01-04344
Mitigation Overview I ARF
5