20061102 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20060706

0
® Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA.
(. 11010 Raven Ridge Road • -Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
Transmittal
To: nl (-- nOn Project #: q%J
(r)1 Date: D
.
A-h " O,Vn d (-ir A Project Name: kp-? IV F
m?
1 A r

File:

We Transmit to you Herewith: Under Separate Cover:
? Drawings For your information and files
El By mail .
? Specifications ? For comment or approval [M By courier
? Brochures or photos ? Returned for correction, resubmit
? By express
Correspondence ? Approved as noted
? As per your request
No. Conies Document No. Date Descri ption
DULWOL -

IrlLy
Remarks:
OCT 1
u cnwosures are not as listed as above, kindly notify us at once.
By:
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Off ice:
236 LcPhillip Court, Suite C

Concord, NC 28025 3817-E Lawndale Drive

Phone: [phone] Greensboro, NC 27455

Fax: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
0
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandE(`.com
September 29, 2006
S&EC Project # 9881.wl
DWQ Project 406-1102
NCDENR-DWQ
Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Parkview Building
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Response to the NCDWQ's Notice of Withdrawal
Roslin Farms
Hoke County
Dear Ms. Karoly:
On July 6, 2006 we submitted a permit application package to the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
requesting written concurrence to proceed utilizing Nationwide Permits 14 & 18 for proposed impacts to
jurisdictional features. With this application, we copied the NCDWQ with two (2) copies of the application and
supplemental information to satisfy the required notification for utilizing Water Quality Certification (WQC) 3402,
when using NWP 18, which does not require written approval from the NC-DWQ.
On July 25, 2006 we received a request for additional information from the NC-DWQ dated July 19, 2006. This
letter specifically requested a revised Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application, five (5) copies of this
revised PCN and the appropriate fee of $200.00 for the written concurrence to utilized WQC 3404 (NWP 14). No
further information was requested in this letter for the use of WQC 3402 (NWP 18). On August 2, 2006, we
responded with a revised PCN, submitted five (5) copies and the appropriate fee of $200.00.
On August 21, 2006 we received a second request for additional information dated August 15, 2006. In this letter
the avoidance of impacts resulting from ditches #1 and #2 was requested. These impacts are being requested
utilizing WQC 3402 (N-WP 18). Because the requested combined impacts to "Waters of the State" are less than 150
linear feet of stream and less than 1/3 acre of wetlands (project east of I-95) and an individual certification was not
requested by the director of the NCDWQ, no written concurrence for proposed impacts resulting from NWP 18 is
required from the NCDWQ. You additionally, requested that the Carolina Bay be shown on the plan sheet. The
Carolina Bay is not going to be impacted and is being preserved as "open space," however on September 5, 2006
S&EC sent you an overall map indicating the location of the un-impacted Carolina Bay.
On September 12, 2006 we received a Notice of Withdrawal dated September 11, 2006. The letter stated that we did
not provide the requested information as follows.
"This office believes that the ditches labeled on the plans as "ditch No. 2 and Ditch No. 3" are not required
and impacts to the wetlands should be avoided. Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts."
As previously stated the ditching impacts were requested utilizing WQC# 3402 (NWP 18). Because the project is
located east of I-95, approval from the NC-DWQ is not required for wetland impacts utilizing NWP 18 when overall
project impacts are less than 1/3 of an acre or less than 150 linear feet. We do understand that when using NWP 18
written notification to DWQ is required. According to WQC # 3402 the notification requirement is satisfied by
providing two copies of the PCN form to the DWQ at the same time that the PCN form is sent to the US Army
Corps of Engineers. This requirement was satisfied in the initial submittal to the NC-DWQ on July 6, 2006, and
therefore the impacts requesting the use of NWP 18 has been completed as permitted by the USACE.
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Because the written notification to the DWQ was satisfied in July and an individual certification was not requested
within 30 days of the receipt of the written notification, S&EC feels that all of the necessary requirements for WQC
#3402 have been met. Secondarily, because WQC #3402 was completely satisfied in July the overall application
submittal including the request for WQC # 3404 (NWP 14) should not have been withdrawn.
At this time we are currently requesting that the NC-DWQ process our application for WQC #3404 (NWP 14)
including the requested information which was provided by S&EC on September 5`h, 2006. We assume that because
the application was unnecessarily withdrawn that the application fee for the authorization of WQC# 3404 will not be
required.
Please call or email me at CFln?vers(n)SandEC.enm if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
e"-'--
Chris Flowers
Wetland Scientist
Attachments:
WQC 3402 (copy)
WQC #3402
GENERAL CERTIFICATION FOR PROJECTS ELIGIBLE
FOR CORPS OF ENGINEERS NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 18 (MINOR DISCHARGES)
39 (RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENTS),
41 (RESHAPING EXISTING DRAINAGE DITCHES), 42 (RECREATIONAL FACILITIES),
43 (STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES) AND 44 (MINING ACTIVITIES),
AND RIPARIAN AREA PROTECTION RULES (BUFFER RULES)
This General Certification is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401,
Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) Regulations in 15A NCAC 2H, Section .0500 and 15A NCAC 26 .0200 for
the discharge of fill material to waters and adjacent wetland areas or to wetland areas that are not
a part of the surface tributary system to interstate waters or navigable waters of the United States
(i.e., isolated wetlands) as described in 33 CFR 330 Appendix A (B) (18, 39, 41, 42, 43 and 44) of
the Corps of Engineers regulations (i.e., Nationwide Permit No. 39) and for the Riparian Area
Protection Rules (Buffer Rules) in 15A NCAC 2B .0200. This Certification replaces Water Quality
Certification Numbers 3106 and 3108 issued on February 11, 1997, and Water Quality
Certification Number 3287 issued on June 1, 2000 and Water Quality Certification Number 3362
issued March 18, 2002. This WQC is rescinded when the Corps of Engineers re-authorizes
Nationwide Permits 18, 39, 41, 42, 43 or 44 or when deemed appropriate by the Director of DWQ.
The State of North Carolina certifies that the specified category of activity will not violate
applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217
if conducted in accordance with the conditions hereinafter set forth.
Conditions of Certification:
1. Enumerating and Reporting of Impacts:
• Streams - Impacts to streams as determined by the Division of Water Quality shall be
measured as length of the centerline of the normal flow channel. Permanent and/or
temporary stream impacts shall be enumerated on the entire project for all impacts
regardless of which 404 Nationwide Permits are used. Stream relocations and
stream bed and/or bank hardening are considered to be permanent stream impacts.
Any activity that results in a loss of use of stream functions including but not limited to
filling, relocating, flooding, excavation, dredging and complete shading shall be
considered stream impacts. Enumeration of impacts to streams shall include streams
enclosed by bottomless culverts, bottomless arches or other spanning structures
when a 404 Permit is used anywhere in a project unless the entire structure
(including construction impacts) spans the entire bed and both banks of the stream,
is only used for a road, driveway or path crossing, and is not mitered to follow the
stream pattern. Impacts for dam footprints and flooding will count toward the
threshold for stream impacts, but flooding upstream of the dam will not (as long as no
filling, excavation, relocation or other modification of the existing stream dimension,
pattern or profile occurs) count towards mitigation requirements. Any filling,
excavation, relocation or other modification of the existing stream (other than
flooding) must re-establish the same dimensions, patterns and profiles of the existing
channel (or those of a stable reference reach if the existing channel is unstable) to
the maximum extent practical.
• Wetlands - Impacts to wetlands as determined by the Division of Water Quality shall
be measured as area. Permanent and/or temporary wetland impacts shall be
enumerated on the entire project for all impacts regardless of which 404 Nationwide
Permits are used. Any activity that results in a loss of use of wetland functions
including but not limited to filling, excavating, draining, and flooding shall be
considered wetland impacts. Enumeration of impacts to wetlands shall include
activities that change the hydrology of a wetland when a 404 Permit is used
anywhere in a project.
WQC #3402
• Lakes and Ponds - Impacts to waters other than streams and wetlands as
determined by the Division of Water Quality shall be measured as area. Permanent
and/or temporary water impacts shall be enumerated on the entire project for all
impacts proposed regardless of which 404 Nationwide Permits are used. Any activity
that results in a loss of use of aquatic functions including but not limited to filling and
dredging shall be considered waters impacts.
Application Thresholds - Stream, wetland and water impacts that exceed any of the
thresholds below require a complete application and written concurrence to use this
Certification:
• Total stream impacts of greater or equal to 150 cumulative feet of stream length for
the entire project require written notification to and approval by the Division of Water
Quality, and/or
• Impacts to waters of equal to or greater than 1/3 of an acre require written notification
to and approval by the Division of Water Quality, and/or
• Wetland impacts of greater or equal to 1/3 of an acre east of 1-95 and 1/10 of an acre
west of 1-95 require written notification to and approval by the Division of Water
Quality except as specified below. Any impacts to wetlands adjacent to waters
designated as ORW, SA, WS-I, WS-II or Trout or are designated as a North Carolina
or National Wild and Scenic River and wetlands classified as SWL and/or UWL as
well as wetlands described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (e) require a complete application
and written concurrence from the Division of Water Quality to use this Certification.
These thresholds apply for the entire project regardless of the number of Nationwide
Permits applicable to the Certification that are issued by the USACE for the project;
• Written notification to DWQ is required for all applications that propose to use
Nationwide Permit 18. This notification requirement will be satisfied by providing two
(2) copies of the PCN form to DWQ at the same time that the PCN form is sent to the
US Army Corps of Engineers. A formal application and fee is not required unless
DWQ decides that an Individual Certification will be required for the project. In this
case, the applicant will be notified in writing from DWQ within 30 days of the receipt
of the written notification.
• Proposed fill or substantial modification of any amount of wetlands classified in
accordance with 15A NCAC 213 .0101(e)(7) as Unique Wetlands (UWL) shall require
written concurrence from the Division of Water Quality;
2. Impacts to any stream length in the Neuse, Tar-Pamlico or Randleman River Basins (or
any other major river basins with Riparian Area Protection Rules [Buffer Rules] in effect at
the time of application) requires written concurrence for this Certification from DWQ in
accordance with 15A NCAC 213.0200. Activities listed as "exempt" from these rules do not
need to apply for written concurrence under this Certification. New development activities
located in the protected 50-foot wide riparian areas (whether jurisdictional wetlands or not)
within the Neuse and Tar-Pamlico River Basins shall be limited to "uses" identified within
and constructed in accordance with 15A NCAC 213 .0200. All new development shall be
located, designed, constructed, and maintained to have minimal disturbance to protect
water quality to the maximum extent practicable through the use of best management
practices;
Irrespective of other application thresholds in this General Certification, all impacts to
perennial waters and their associated buffers require written approval from DWQ since
such impacts are allowable as provided in 15A NCAC 2B. 0212 (WS-1), 213.0213 (WS-II),
2B .0214 (WS-III) and 213.0215 (WS-IV). Only water dependent activities, public projects
and structures with diminimus increases in impervious surfaces will be allowed as outlined
in those rules. All other activities require a variance from the delegated local government
and/or the NC Environmental Management Commission before the 401 Water Quality
Certification can be processed. In addition, a 30 foot wide vegetative buffer for low
density development or a 100 foot wide vegetative buffer for high density development
WQC #3402
must be maintained adjacent to all perennial waters except for allowances as provided
under the Water Supply Watershed Protection Rules. For the purposes of this condition,
perennial waters are defined as those shown as perennial waters on the most recent
USGS 1:24,000 topographic map or as otherwise determined by local government
studies;
4. Additional site-specific stormwater management requirements may be added to this
Certification at DWQ's discretion on a case by case basis for projects that have or are
anticipated to have impervious cover of greater than 30 percent. Site-specific stormwater
management shall be designed to remove 85% TSS according to the latest version of
DWQ's Stormwater Best Management Practices manual at a minimum.
Additionally, in watersheds within one mile and draining to 303(d) listed waters, as well as
watersheds that are classified as nutrient sensitive waters (NSW), water supply waters
(WS), trout waters Jr), high quality waters (HQW), and outstanding resource waters
(ORW), the Division shall require that extended detention wetlands, bio-retention areas,
and ponds followed by forested filter strips (designed according to latest version of the NC
DENR Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual) be constructed as part of the
stormwater management plan when a site-specific stormwater management plan is
required.
For streams classified as Water Supply, High Quality Waters and Outstanding Resource
Waters, post-construction, on-site stormwater management shall be required as
appropriate and as outlined in 15A NCAC 2B.0104(m) and 2H .1000 to.1007,
respectively, in addition to that required in this General Certification.
Alternative designs may be requested by the applicant and will be reviewed on a case-by-
case basis by the Division of Water Quality.
Approval of stormwater management plans by the Division of Water Quality's other
existing state stormwater programs including appropriate local programs are sufficient to
satisfy this Condition as long as the stormwater management plans meet or exceed the
design requirements specified in this condition. This condition applies unless more
stringent requirements are in effect from other state water quality programs.
• Unless specified otherwise in the approval letter, the final, written stormwater
management plan shall be approved in writing by the Division of Water Quality's
Wetlands Unit before the impacts specified in this Certification occur.
• The facilities must be designed to treat the runoff from the entire project, unless
otherwise explicitly approved by the Division of Water Quality.
• Also, before any permanent building or other structure is occupied at the subject site,
the facilities (as approved by the Wetlands Unit) shall be constructed and operational,
and the stormwater management plan (as approved by the Wetlands Unit) shall be
implemented.
• The structural stormwater practices as approved by the Wetlands Unit as well as
drainage patterns must be maintained in perpetuity.
• No changes to the structural stormwater practices shall be made without written
authorization from the Division of Water Quality.
5. Compensatory stream mitigation shall be required at a 1:1 ratio for not only perennial but
also intermittent stream impacts that require application to DWQ in watersheds classified
as ORW, HQW, Tr, WS-I and WS-II unless the project is a linear, publicly-funded
transportation project, which has a 150-foot per-stream impact allowance;
6. In accordance with North Carolina General Statute Section 143-215.3D(e), any
application for a 401 Water Quality Certification must include the appropriate fee. If a
WQC #3402
project also requires a CAMA Permit, one payment to both agencies shall be submitted
and will be the higher of the two fees;
7. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) compensatory mitigation may be
required for impacts to 150 linear feet or more of streams and/or one acre or more of
wetlands for an entire project. For linear public transportation projects, impacts equal to
or exceeding 150 feet per stream may require mitigation. In addition, buffer mitigation
may be required for any project with Riparian Area Protection Rules (Buffer Rules) in
effect at the time of application for buffer impacts resulting from activities classified as
"allowable with mitigation" within the "Table of Uses" section of the Buffer Rules or require
a variance under the Buffer Rules. A determination of buffer, wetland and stream
mitigation requirements shall be made for any Certification for this Nationwide Permit.
The most current design and monitoring protocols from DWQ shall be followed and written
plans submitted for DWQ approval as required in those protocols. When compensatory
mitigation is required for a project, the mitigation plans must be approved by DWQ in
writing before the impacts approved by the Certification occur, unless otherwise specified
in the approval letter. The mitigation plan must be implemented and/or constructed before
any permanent building or structure on site is occupied. In the case of public road
projects, the mitigation plan must be implemented before the road is opened to the
travelling public. Please note that if a stream relocation is conducted as a stream
restoration as defined in The Internal Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina,
April 2001, the restored length can be used as compensatory mitigation for the impacts
resulting from the relocation;
8. For any project involving re-alignment of streams, a stream relocation plan must be
included with the 401 application for written DWQ approval. Relocated stream designs
should include the same dimensions, patterns and profiles as the existing channel (or a
stable reference reach if the existing channel is unstable), to the maximum extent
practical. The new channel should be constructed in the dry and water shall not be turned
into the new channel until the banks are stabilized. Vegetation used for bank stabilization
shall be limited to native woody species, and should include establishment of a 30 foot
wide wooded and an adjacent 20 foot wide vegetated buffer on both sides of the relocated
channel to the maximum extent practical. A transitional phase incorporating coir fiber and
seedling establishment is allowable. Also, rip-rap, A-Jacks, concrete, gabions or other
hard structures may be allowed if it is necessary to maintain the physical integrity of the
stream, but the applicant must provide written justification and any calculations used to
determine the extent of rip-rap coverage requested. If suitable stream mitigation is not
practical on-site, then stream impact will need to be mitigated elsewhere. Please note
that if a stream relocation is conducted as a stream restoration as defined in The Internal
Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, April 2001, the restored length can
be used as compensatory mitigation for the impacts resulting from the relocation;
Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands must be
placed below the elevation of the streambed to allow low flow passage of water and
aquatic life unless it can be shown to DWQ that providing passage would be impractical.
Design and placement of culverts including open bottom or bottomless arch culverts and
other structures including temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a
manner that may result in aggradation, degradation or significant changes in hydrology of
wetlands or stream beds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and down stream of the above
structures. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the equilibrium shall be
maintained if requested to do so in writing by DWQ. Additionally, when roadways,
causeways or other fill projects are constructed across FEMA-designated floodways or
wetlands, openings such as culverts or bridges must be provided to maintain the natural
hydrology of the system as well as prevent constriction of the floodway that may result in
aggradation, degradation or significant changes in hydrology of streams or wetlands;
WQC #3402
10. That appropriate sediment and erosion control practices which equal or exceed those
outlined in the most recent version of the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Planning and Design Manual" or the "North Carolina Surface Mining Manual" whichever is
more appropriate (available from the Division of Land Resources (DLR) in the DENR
Regional or Central Offices) shall be in full compliance with all specifications governing
the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management
Practices in order to assure compliance with the appropriate turbidity water quality
standard;
11. All sediment and erosion control measures placed in wetlands and waters shall be
removed and the original grade restored within two months after the Division of Land
Resources has released the project;
12. That additional site-specific conditions may be added to projects proposed under this
Certification in order to ensure compliance with all applicable water quality and effluent
standards;
13. Measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete from coming into contact
with waters of the state until the concrete has hardened;
14. If an environmental document is required, this Certification is not valid until a Finding of
No Significant Impact (FONSI) or Record of Decision (ROD) is issued by the State
Clearinghouse;
15. If this Certification is used to access building sites, all lots owned by the applicant must be
buildable without additional fill beyond that explicitly allowed under other General
Certifications. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the lots are buildable
without requiring additional impacts to wetlands, waters or buffers if required to do so in
writing by DWQ. For road construction purposes, this Certification shall only be utilized
from natural high ground to natural high ground;
16. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all lots with remaining
jurisdictional wetlands and waters or areas within 50 feet of all streams and ponds. These
mechanisms shall be put in place within 30 days of the date of issuance of the 401
Certification letter or the issuance of the 404 Permit (whichever is later). A sample deed
notification format can be downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands . DWQ shall be sent copies of all deed restrictions
applied to these lots;
17. When written concurrence is required, the applicant is required to use the most recent
version of the Certification of Completion form to notify DWQ when all work included in the
401 Certification has been completed;
18. Concurrence from DWQ that this Certification applies to an individual project shall expire
three years from the date of the cover letter from DWQ or on the same day as the
expiration date of the corresponding Nationwide Permit 18, 39, 41, 42, 43 or 44,
whichever is sooner.
WQC #3402
Non-compliance with or violation of the conditions herein set forth by a specific fill project
may result in revocation of this Certification for the project and may also result in criminal and/or
civil penalties.
The Director of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality may require submission of a
formal application for Individual Certification for any project in this category of activity that
requires written concurrence under this certification, if it is determined that the project is likely to
have a significant adverse effect upon water quality or degrade the waters so that existing uses of
the wetland or downstream waters are precluded.
Public hearings may be held for specific applications or group of applications prior to a
Certification decision if deemed in the public's best interest by the Director of the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality.
Effective date: March 2003
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
By
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Director
WQC # 3402
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandE,?.com
September 29, 2006
S&EC Project # 988 Lwl
DWQ Project #06-1102
NCDENR-DWQ
Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Parkview Building
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Response to the NCDWQ's Notice of Withdrawal
Roslin Farms
Hoke County
Dear Ms. Karoly:
O C T 12006
iicTC ? .. '1'6R ,r _QTY
' `,rttd Jl'cglYCi 1
On July 6, 2006 we submitted a permit application package to the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
requesting written concurrence to proceed utilizing Nationwide Permits 14 & 18 for proposed impacts to
jurisdictional features. With this application, we copied the NCDWQ with two (2) copies of the application and
supplemental information to satisfy the required notification for utilizing Water Quality Certification (WQC) 3402,
when using NWP 18, which does not require written approval from the NC-DWQ.
On July 25, 2006 we received a request for additional information from the NC-DWQ dated July 19, 2006. This
letter specifically requested a revised Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application, five (5) copies of this
revised PCN and the appropriate fee of $200.00 for the written concurrence to utilized WQC 3404 (NWT 14). No
further information was requested in this letter for the use of WQC 3402 (NWT 18). On August 2, 2006, we
responded with a revised PCN, submitted five (5) copies and the appropriate fee of $200.00.
On August 21, 2006 we received a second request for additional information dated August 15, 2006. In this letter
the avoidance of impacts resulting from ditches #1 and #2 was requested. These impacts are being requested
utilizing WQC 3402 (NWT 18). Because the requested combined impacts to "Waters of the State" are less than 150
linear feet of stream and less than 1/3 acre of wetlands (project east of I-95) and an individual certification was not
requested by the director of the NCDWQ, no written concurrence for proposed impacts resulting from NWP 18 is
required from the NCDWQ. You additionally, requested that the Carolina Bay be shown on the plan sheet. The
Carolina Bay is not going to be impacted and is being preserved as "open space," however on September 5, 2006
S&EC sent you an overall map indicating the location of the un-impacted Carolina Bay.
On September 12, 2006 we received a Notice of Withdrawal dated September 11, 2006. The letter stated that we did
not provide the requested information as follows.
"Thus office believes that the ditches labeled on the plans as "ditch No. 2 and Ditch No. 3" are not required
and impacts to the wetlands should be avoided. Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts."
As previously stated the ditching impacts were requested utilizing WQC# 3402 (NWT 18). Because the project is
located east of I-95, approval from the NC-DWQ is not required for wetland impacts utilizing MVP 18 when overall
project impacts are less than 1/3 of an acre or less than 150 linear feet. We do understand that when using NWP 18
written notification to DWQ is required. According to WQC it 3402 the notification requirement is satisfied by
providing two copies of the PCN form to the DWQ at the same time that the PCN form is sent to the US Army
Corps of Engineers. This requirement was satisfied in the initial submittal to the NC-DWQ on July 6, 2006, and
therefore the impacts requesting the use of NWP 18 has been completed as permitted by the USACE.
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Because the written notification to the DWQ was satisfied in July and an individual certification was not requested
within 30 days of the receipt of the written notification, S&EC feels that all of the necessary requirements for WQC
#3402 have been met. Secondarily, because WQC #3402 was completely satisfied in July the overall application
submittal including the request for WQC # 3404 (NWP 14) should not have been withdrawn.
At this time we are currently requesting that the NC-DWQ process our application for WQC 93404 (NWP 14)
including the requested information which was provided by S&EC on September 5 h, 2006. We assume that because
the application was unnecessarily withdrawn that the application fee for the authorization of WQC# 3404 will not be
required.
Please call or email me at CFlmvery,'iUandEC.conr if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Cis-- 7i-II
Chris Flowers
Wetland Scientist
Attachments:
WQC 3402 (copy)
WQC #3402
GENERAL CERTIFICATION FOR PROJECTS ELIGIBLE
FOR CORPS OF ENGINEERS NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 18 (MINOR DISCHARGES)
39 (RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENTS),
41 (RESHAPING EXISTING DRAINAGE DITCHES), 42 (RECREATIONAL FACILITIES),
43 (STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES) AND 44 (MINING ACTIVITIES),
AND RIPARIAN AREA PROTECTION RULES (BUFFER RULES)
This General Certification is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401,
Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) Regulations in 15A NCAC 2H, Section.0500 and 15A NCAC 2B.0200 for
the discharge of fill material to waters and adjacent wetland areas or to wetland areas that are not
a part of the surface tributary system to interstate waters or navigable waters of the United States
(i.e., isolated wetlands) as described in 33 CFR 330 Appendix A (B) (18, 39, 41, 42, 43 and 44) of
the Corps of Engineers regulations (i.e., Nationwide Permit No. 39) and for the Riparian Area
Protection Rules (Buffer Rules) in 15A NCAC 2B .0200. This Certification replaces Water Quality
Certification Numbers 3106 and 3108 issued on February 11, 1997, and Water Quality
Certification Number 3287 issued on June 1, 2000 and Water Quality Certification Number 3362
issued March 18, 2002. This WQC is rescinded when the Corps of Engineers re-authorizes
Nationwide Permits 18, 39, 41, 42, 43 or 44 or when deemed appropriate by the Director of DWQ.
The State of North Carolina certifies that the specified category of activity will not violate
applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217
if conducted in accordance with the conditions hereinafter set forth.
Conditions of Certification:
1. Enumerating and Reporting of Impacts:
• Streams - Impacts to streams as determined by the Division of Water Quality shall be
measured as length of the centerline of the normal flow channel. Permanent and/or
temporary stream impacts shall be enumerated on the entire project for all impacts
regardless of which 404 Nationwide Permits are used. Stream relocations and
stream bed and/or bank hardening are considered to be permanent stream impacts.
Any activity that results in a loss of use of stream functions including but not limited to
filling, relocating, flooding, excavation, dredging and complete shading shall be
considered stream impacts. Enumeration of impacts to streams shall include streams
enclosed by bottomless culverts, bottomless arches or other spanning structures
when a 404 Permit is used anywhere in a project unless the entire structure
(including construction impacts) spans the entire bed and both banks of the stream,
is only used for a road, driveway or path crossing, and is not mitered to follow the
stream pattern. Impacts for dam footprints and flooding will count toward the
threshold for stream impacts, but flooding upstream of the dam will not (as long as no
filling, excavation, relocation or other modification of the existing stream dimension,
pattern or profile occurs) count towards mitigation requirements. Any filling,
excavation, relocation or other modification of the existing stream (other than
flooding) must re-establish the same dimensions, patterns and profiles of the existing
channel (or those of a stable reference reach if the existing channel is unstable) to
the maximum extent practical.
• Wetlands - Impacts to wetlands as determined by the Division of Water Quality shall
be measured as area. Permanent and/or temporary wetland impacts shall be
enumerated on the entire project for all impacts regardless of which 404 Nationwide
Permits are used. Any activity that results in a loss of use of wetland functions
including but not limited to filling, excavating, draining, and flooding shall be
considered wetland impacts. Enumeration of impacts to wetlands shall include
activities that change the hydrology of a wetland when a 404 Permit is used
anywhere in a project.
WQC #3402
• Lakes and Ponds - Impacts to waters other than streams and wetlands as
determined by the Division of Water Quality shall be measured as area. Permanent
and/or temporary water impacts shall be enumerated on the entire project for all
impacts proposed regardless of which 404 Nationwide Permits are used. Any activity
that results in a loss of use of aquatic functions including but not limited to filling and
dredging shall be considered waters impacts.
Application Thresholds - Stream, wetland and water impacts that exceed any of the
thresholds below require a complete application and written concurrence to use this
Certification:
• Total stream impacts of greater or equal to 150 cumulative feet of stream length for
the entire project require written notification to and approval by the Division of Water
Quality, and/or
• Impacts to waters of equal to or greater than 1/3 of an acre require written notification
to and approval by the Division of Water Quality, and/or
• Wetland impacts of greater or equal to 1/3 of an acre east of 1-95 and 1/10 of an acre
west of 1-95 require written notification to and approval by the Division of Water
Quality except as specified below. Any impacts to wetlands adjacent to waters
designated as ORW, SA, WS-l, WS-II or Trout or are designated as a North Carolina
or National Wild and Scenic River and wetlands classified as SWL and/or UWL as
well as wetlands described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (e) require a complete application
and written concurrence from the Division of Water Quality to use this Certification.
These thresholds apply for the entire project regardless of the number of Nationwide
Permits applicable to the Certification that are issued by the USACE for the project;
• Written notification to DWQ is required for all applications that propose to use
Nationwide Permit 18. This notification requirement will be satisfied by providing two
(2) copies of the PCN form to DWQ at the same time that the PCN form is sent to the
US Army Corps of Engineers. A formal application and fee is not required unless
DWQ decides that an Individual Certification will be required for the project. In this
case, the applicant will be notified in writing from DWQ within 30 days of the receipt
of the written notification.
• Proposed fill or substantial modification of any amount of wetlands classified in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2B.0101(e)(7) as Unique Wetlands (UWL) shall require
written concurrence from the Division of Water Quality;
2. Impacts to any stream length in the Neuse, Tar-Pamlico or Randleman River Basins (or
any other major river basins with Riparian Area Protection Rules [Buffer Rules] in effect at
the time of application) requires written concurrence for this Certification from DWQ in
accordance with 15A NCAC 26.0200. Activities listed as "exempt" from these rules do not
need to apply for written concurrence under this Certification. New development activities
located in the protected 50-foot wide riparian areas (whether jurisdictional wetlands or not)
within the Neuse and Tar-Pamlico River Basins shall be limited to "uses" identified within
and constructed in accordance with 15A NCAC 2B .0200. All new development shall be
located, designed, constructed, and maintained to have minimal disturbance to protect
water quality to the maximum extent practicable through the use of best management
practices;
3. Irrespective of other application thresholds in this General Certification, all impacts to
perennial waters and their associated buffers require written approval from DWQ since
such impacts are allowable as provided in 15A NCAC 2B. 0212 (WS-1), 2B .0213 (WS-II),
2B.0214 (WS-III) and 2B .0215 (WS-IV). Only water dependent activities, public projects
and structures with diminimus increases in impervious surfaces will be allowed as outlined
in those rules. All other activities require a variance from the delegated local government
and/or the NC Environmental Management Commission before the 401 Water Quality
Certification can be processed. In addition, a 30 foot wide vegetative buffer for low
density development or a 100 foot wide vegetative buffer for high density development
WQC #3402
must be maintained adjacent to all perennial waters except for allowances as provided
under the Water Supply Watershed Protection Rules. For the purposes of this condition,
perennial waters are defined as those shown as perennial waters on the most recent
USGS 1:24,000 topographic map or as otherwise determined by local government
studies;
4. Additional site-specific stormwater management requirements may be added to this
Certification at DWQ's discretion on a case by case basis for projects that have or are
anticipated to have impervious cover of greater than 30 percent. Site-specific stormwater
management shall be designed to remove 85% TSS according to the latest version of
DWQ's Stormwater Best Management Practices manual at a minimum.
Additionally, in watersheds within one mile and draining to 303(d) listed waters, as well as
watersheds that are classified as nutrient sensitive waters (NSW), water supply waters
(WS), trout waters Jr), high quality waters (HQW), and outstanding resource waters
(ORW), the Division shall require that extended detention wetlands, bio-retention areas,
and ponds followed by forested filter strips (designed according to latest version of the NC
DENR Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual) be constructed as part of the
stormwater management plan when a site-specific stormwater management plan is
required.
For streams classified as Water Supply, High Quality Waters and Outstanding Resource
Waters, post-construction, on-site stormwater management shall be required as
appropriate and as outlined in 15A NCAC 2B .0104(m) and 2H .1000 to .1007,
respectively, in addition to that required in this General Certification.
Alternative designs may be requested by the applicant and will be reviewed on a case-by-
case basis by the Division of Water Quality.
Approval of stormwater management plans by the Division of Water Quality's other
existing state stormwater programs including appropriate local programs are sufficient to
satisfy this Condition as long as the stormwater management plans meet or exceed the
design requirements specified in this condition. This condition applies unless more
stringent requirements are in effect from other state water quality programs.
• Unless specified otherwise in the approval letter, the final, written stormwater
management plan shall be approved in writing by the Division of Water Quality's
Wetlands Unit before the impacts specified in this Certification occur.
• The facilities must be designed to treat the runoff from the entire project, unless
otherwise explicitly approved by the Division of Water Quality.
• Also, before any permanent building or other structure is occupied at the subject site,
the facilities (as approved by the Wetlands Unit) shall be constructed and operational,
and the stormwater management plan (as approved by the Wetlands Unit) shall be
implemented.
• The structural stormwater practices as approved by the Wetlands Unit as well as
drainage patterns must be maintained in perpetuity.
• No changes to the structural stormwater practices shall be made without written
authorization from the Division of Water Quality.
5. Compensatory stream mitigation shall be required at a 1:1 ratio for not only perennial but
also intermittent stream impacts that require application to DWQ in watersheds classified
as ORW, HQW, Tr, WS-1 and WS-II unless the project is a linear, publicly-funded
transportation project, which has a 150-foot per-stream impact allowance;
6. In accordance with North Carolina General Statute Section 143-215.3D(e), any
application for a 401 Water Quality Certification must include the appropriate fee. If a
WQC #3402
project also requires a CAMA Permit, one payment to both agencies shall be submitted
and will be the higher of the two fees;
7. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) compensatory mitigation may be
required for impacts to 150 linear feet or more of streams and/or one acre or more of
wetlands for an entire project. For linear public transportation projects, impacts equal to
or exceeding 150 feet per stream may require mitigation. In addition, buffer mitigation
may be required for any project with Riparian Area Protection Rules (Buffer Rules) in
effect at the time of application for buffer impacts resulting from activities classified as
"allowable with mitigation" within the "Table of Uses" section of the Buffer Rules or require
a variance under the Buffer Rules. A determination of buffer, wetland and stream
mitigation requirements shall be made for any Certification for this Nationwide Permit.
The most current design and monitoring protocols from DWQ shall be followed and written
plans submitted for DWQ approval as required in those protocols. When compensatory
mitigation is required for a project, the mitigation plans must be approved by DWQ in
writing before the impacts approved by the Certification occur, unless otherwise specified
in the approval letter. The mitigation plan must be implemented and/or constructed before
any permanent building or structure on site is occupied. In the case of public road
projects, the mitigation plan must be implemented before the road is opened to the
travelling public. Please note that if a stream relocation is conducted as a stream
restoration as defined in The Internal Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina ,
April 2001, the restored length can be used as compensatory mitigation for the impacts
resulting from the relocation;
8. For any project involving re-alignment of streams, a stream relocation plan must be
included with the 401 application for written DWQ approval. Relocated stream designs
should include the same dimensions, patterns and profiles as the existing channel (or a
stable reference reach if the existing channel is unstable), to the maximum extent
practical. The new channel should be constructed in the dry and water shall not be turned
into the new channel until the banks are stabilized. Vegetation used for bank stabilization
shall be limited to native woody species, and should include establishment of a 30 foot
wide wooded and an adjacent 20 foot wide vegetated buffer on both sides of the relocated
channel to the maximum extent practical. A transitional phase incorporating coir fiber and
seedling establishment is allowable. Also, rip-rap, A-Jacks, concrete, gabions or other
hard structures may be allowed if it is necessary to maintain the physical integrity of the
stream, but the applicant must provide written justification and any calculations used to
determine the extent of rip-rap coverage requested. If suitable stream mitigation is not
practical on-site, then stream impact will need to be mitigated elsewhere. Please note
that if a stream relocation is conducted as a stream restoration as defined in The Internal
Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina , April 2001, the restored length can
be used as compensatory mitigation for the impacts resulting from the relocation;
9. Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands must be
placed below the elevation of the streambed to allow low flow passage of water and
aquatic life unless it can be shown to DWQ that providing passage would be impractical.
Design and placement of culverts including open bottom or bottomless arch culverts and
other structures including temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a
manner that may result in aggradation, degradation or significant changes in hydrology of
wetlands or stream beds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and down stream of the above
structures. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the equilibrium shall be
maintained if requested to do so in writing by DWQ. Additionally, when roadways,
causeways or other fill projects are constructed across FEMA-designated floodways or
wetlands, openings such as culverts or bridges must be provided to maintain the natural
hydrology of the system as well as prevent constriction of the floodway that may result in
aggradation, degradation or significant changes in hydrology of streams or wetlands;
WQC #3402
10. That appropriate sediment and erosion control practices which equal or exceed those
outlined in the most recent version of the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Planning and Design Manual" or the "North Carolina Surface Mining Manual" whichever is
more appropriate (available from the Division of Land Resources (DLR) in the DENR
Regional or Central Offices) shall be in full compliance with all specifications governing
the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management
Practices in order to assure compliance with the appropriate turbidity water quality
standard;
11. All sediment and erosion control measures placed in wetlands and waters shall be
removed and the original grade restored within two months after the Division of Land
Resources has released the project;
12. That additional site-specific conditions may be added to projects proposed under this
Certification in order to ensure compliance with all applicable water quality and effluent
standards;
13. Measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete from coming into contact
with waters of the state until the concrete has hardened;
14. If an environmental document is required, this Certification is not valid until a Finding of
No Significant Impact (FONSI) or Record of Decision (ROD) is issued by the State
Clearinghouse;
15. If this Certification is used to access building sites, all lots owned by the applicant must be
buildable without additional fill beyond that explicitly allowed under other General
Certifications. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the lots are buildable
without requiring additional impacts to wetlands, waters or buffers if required to do so in
writing by DWQ. For road construction purposes, this Certification shall only be utilized
from natural high ground to natural high ground;
16. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all lots with remaining
jurisdictional wetlands and waters or areas within 50 feet of all streams and ponds. These
mechanisms shall be put in place within 30 days of the date of issuance of the 401
Certification letter or the issuance of the 404 Permit (whichever is later). A sample deed
notification format can be downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands . DWQ shall be sent copies of all deed restrictions
applied to these lots;
17. When written concurrence is required, the applicant is required to use the most recent
version of the Certification of Completion form to notify DWQ when all work included in the
401 Certification has been completed;
18. Concurrence from DWQ that this Certification applies to an individual project shall expire
three years from the date of the cover letter from DWQ or on the same day as the
expiration date of the corresponding Nationwide Permit 18, 39, 41, 42, 43 or 44,
whichever is sooner.
WQC #3402
Non-compliance with or violation of the conditions herein set forth by a specific fill project
may result in revocation of this Certification for the project and may also result in criminal and/or
civil penalties.
The Director of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality may require submission of a
formal application for Individual Certification for any project in this category of activity that
requires written concurrence under this certification, if it is determined that the project is likely to
have a significant adverse effect upon water quality or degrade the waters so that existing uses of
the wetland or downstream waters are precluded.
Public hearings may be held for specific applications or group of applications prior to a
Certification decision if deemed in the public's best interest by the Director of the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality.
Effective date: March 2003
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
By
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Director
WQC # 3402
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
September 29, 2006
S&EC Project # 9881.wl
DWQ Project #06-1102
NCDENR-DWQ
Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Parkview Building
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Response to the NCDWQ's Notice of Withdrawal
Roslin Farms
Hoke County
Dear Ms. Karoly:
a?•(t?
UU
OCT 1 2006
DE!,'R-V V" TER ?' .TcR BR,^J;CH
On July 6, 2006 we submitted a permit application package to the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
requesting written concurrence to proceed utilizing Nationwide Permits 14 & 18 for proposed impacts to
jurisdictional features. With this application, we copied the NCDWQ with two (2) copies of the application and
supplemental information to satisfy the required notification for utilizing Water Quality Certification (WQC) 3402,
when using NWP 18, which does not require written approval from the NC-DWQ.
On July 25, 2006 we received a request for additional information from the NC-DWQ dated July 19, 2006. This
letter specifically requested a revised Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application, five (5) copies of this
revised PCN and the appropriate fee of $200.00 for the written concurrence to utilized WQC 3404 (NWP 14). No
further information was requested in this letter for the use of WQC 3402 (NWP 18). On August 2, 2006, we
responded with a revised PCN, submitted five (5) copies and the appropriate fee of $200.00.
On August 21, 2006 we received a second request for additional information dated August 15, 2006. In this letter
the avoidance of impacts resulting from ditches #1 and #2 was requested. These impacts are being requested
utilizing WQC 3402 (NWT 18). Because the requested combined impacts to "Waters of the State" are less than 150
linear feet of stream and less than 1/3 acre of wetlands (project east of I-95) and an individual certification was not
requested by the director of the NCDWQ, no written concurrence for proposed impacts resulting from NWP 18 is
required from the NCDWQ. You additionally, requested that the Carolina Bay be shown on the plan sheet. The
Carolina Bay is not going to be impacted,and is being preserved as "open space," however on September 5, 2006
S&EC sent you an overall map indicating the location of the un-impacted Carolina Bay.
On September 12, 2006 we received a Notice of Withdrawal dated September 11, 2006. The letter stated that we did
not provide the requested information as follows.
"This office believes that the ditches labeled on the plans as "ditch No. 2 and Ditch No. 3" are not required
and impacts to the wetlands should be avoided. Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts."
As previously stated the ditching impacts were requested utilizing WQC# 3402 (NWP 18). Because the project is
located east of I-95, approval from the NC-DWQ is not required for wetland impacts uiilizing NWP 18 when overall
project impacts are less than 1/3 of an acre or less than 150 linear feet. We do understand that when using NWP 18
written notification to DWQ is required. According to WQC # 3402 the notification requirement is satisfied by
providing two copies of the PCN form to the DWQ at the same time that the PCN forni is sent to the US Army
Corps of Engineers. This requirement was satisfied in the initial submittal to the NC-DWQ on July 6, 2006, and
therefore the impacts requesting the use of MVP 18 has been completed as permitted by the USACE.
Charlotte Off-ice:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Because the written notification to the DWQ was satisfied in July and an individual certification was not requested
within 30 days of the receipt of the written notification, S&EC feels that all of the necessary requirements for WQC
#3402 have been met. Secondarily, because WQC #3402 was completely satisfied in July the overall application
submittal including the request for WQC # 3404 (NWP 14) should not have been withdrawn.
At this time we are currently requesting that the NC-DWQ process our application for WQC 93404 (NWP 14)
including the requested information which was provided by S&EC on September 5`h, 2006. We assume that because
the application was unnecessarily withdrawn that the application fee for the authorization of WQC# 3404 will not be
required.
Please call or email me at CFloiversPSandF.C.con: if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Chris Flowers
Wetland Scientist
Attachments:
WQC 3402 (copy)
WQC #3402
GENERAL CERTIFICATION FOR PROJECTS ELIGIBLE
FOR CORPS OF ENGINEERS NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 18 (MINOR DISCHARGES)
39 (RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENTS),
41 (RESHAPING EXISTING DRAINAGE DITCHES), 42 (RECREATIONAL FACILITIES).
43 (STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES) AND 44 (MINING ACTIVITIES),
AND RIPARIAN AREA PROTECTION RULES (BUFFER RULES)
This General Certification is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401,
Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) Regulations in 15A NCAC 2H, Section.0500 and 15A NCAC 26 .0200 for
the discharge of fill material to waters and adjacent wetland areas or to wetland areas that are not
a part of the surface tributary system to interstate waters or navigable waters of the United States
(i.e., isolated wetlands) as described in 33 CFR 330 Appendix A (B) (18, 39, 41, 42, 43 and 44) of
the Corps of Engineers regulations (i.e., Nationwide Permit No. 39) and for the Riparian Area
Protection Rules (Buffer Rules) in 15A NCAC 2B .0200. This Certification replaces Water Quality
Certification Numbers 3106 and 3108 issued on February 11, 1997, and Water Quality
Certification Number 3287 issued on June 1, 2000 and Water Quality Certification Number 3362
issued March 18, 2002. This WQC is rescinded when the Corps of Engineers re-authorizes
Nationwide Permits 18, 39, 41, 42, 43 or 44 or when deemed appropriate by the Director of DWQ.
The State of North Carolina certifies that the specified category of activity will not violate
applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217
if conducted in accordance with the conditions hereinafter set forth.
Conditions of Certification:
1. Enumerating and Reporting of Impacts:
• Streams - Impacts to streams as determined by the Division of Water Quality shall be
measured as length of the centerline of the normal flow channel. Permanent and/or
temporary stream impacts shall be enumerated on the entire project for all impacts
regardless of which 404 Nationwide Permits are used. Stream relocations and
stream bed and/or bank hardening are considered to be permanent stream impacts.
Any activity that results in a loss of use of stream functions including but not limited to
filling, relocating, flooding, excavation, dredging and complete shading shall be
considered stream impacts. Enumeration of impacts to streams shall include streams
enclosed by bottomless culverts, bottomless arches or other spanning structures
when a 404 Permit is used anywhere in a project unless the entire structure
(including construction impacts) spans the entire bed and both banks of the stream,
is only used for a road, driveway or path crossing, and is not mitered to follow the
stream pattern. Impacts for dam footprints and flooding will count toward the
threshold for stream impacts, but flooding upstream of the dam will not (as long as no
filling, excavation, relocation or other modification of the existing stream dimension,
pattern or profile occurs) count towards mitigation requirements. Any filling,
excavation, relocation or other modification of the existing stream (other than
flooding) must re-establish the same dimensions, patterns and profiles of the existing
channel (or those of a stable reference reach if the existing channel is unstable) to
the maximum extent practical.
• Wetlands - Impacts to wetlands as determined by the Division of Water Quality shall
be measured as area. Permanent and/or temporary wetland impacts shall be
enumerated on the entire project for all impacts regardless of which 404 Nationwide
Permits are used. Any activity that results in a loss of use of wetland functions
including but not limited to filling, excavating, draining, and flooding shall be
considered wetland impacts. Enumeration of impacts to wetlands shall include
activities that change the hydrology of a wetland when a 404 Permit is used
anywhere in a project.
WQC #3402
• Lakes and Ponds - Impacts to waters other than streams and wetlands as
determined by the Division of Water Quality shall be measured as area. Permanent
and/or temporary water impacts shall be enumerated on the entire project for all
impacts proposed regardless of which 404 Nationwide Permits are used. Any activity
that results in a loss of use of aquatic functions including but not limited to filling and
dredging shall be considered waters impacts.
Application Thresholds - Stream, wetland and water impacts that exceed any of the
thresholds below require a complete application and written concurrence to use this
Certification:
• Total stream impacts of greater or equal to 150 cumulative feet of stream length for
the entire project require written notification to and approval by the Division of Water
Quality, and/or
• Impacts to waters of equal to or greater than 1/3 of an acre require written notification
to and approval by the Division of Water Quality, and/or
• Wetland impacts of greater or equal to 1/3 of an acre east of 1-95 and 1/10 of an acre
west of 1-95 require written notification to and approval by the Division of Water
Quality except as specified below. Any impacts to wetlands adjacent to waters
designated as ORW, SA, WS-1, WS-II or Trout or are designated as a North Carolina
or National Wild and Scenic River and wetlands classified as SWL and/or UWL as
well as wetlands described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (e) require a complete application
and written concurrence from the Division of Water Quality to use this Certification.
These thresholds apply for the entire project regardless of the number of Nationwide
Permits applicable to the Certification that are issued by the USACE for the project;
• Written notification to DWQ is required for all applications that propose to use
Nationwide Permit 18. This notification requirement will be satisfied by providing two
(2) copies of the PCN form to DWQ at the same time that the PCN form is sent to the
US Army Corps of Engineers. A formal application and fee is not required unless
DWQ decides that an Individual Certification will be required for the project. In this
case, the applicant will be notified in writing from DWQ within 30 days of the receipt
of the written notification.
• Proposed fill or substantial modification of any amount of wetlands classified in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2B.0101(e)(7) as Unique Wetlands (UWL) shall require
written concurrence from the Division of Water Quality;
2. Impacts to any stream length in the Neuse, Tar-Pamlico or Randleman River Basins (or
any other major river basins with Riparian Area Protection Rules [Buffer Rules] in effect at
the time of application) requires written concurrence for this Certification from DWQ in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2B.0200. Activities listed as "exempt" from these rules do not
need to apply for written concurrence under this Certification. New development activities
located in the protected 50-foot wide riparian areas (whether jurisdictional wetlands or not)
within the Neuse and Tar-Pamlico River Basins shall be limited to "uses" identified within
and constructed in accordance with 15A NCAC 2B .0200. All new development shall be
located, designed, constructed, and maintained to have minimal disturbance to protect
water quality to the maximum extent practicable through the use of best management
practices;
3. Irrespective of other application thresholds in this General Certification, all impacts to
perennial waters and their associated buffers require written approval from DWQ since
such impacts are allowable as provided in 15A NCAC 2B. 0212 (WS-1), 213.0213 (WS-II),
2B .0214 (WS-III) and 213.0215 (WS-IV). Only water dependent activities, public projects
and structures with diminimus increases in impervious surfaces will be allowed as outlined
in those rules. All other activities require a variance from the delegated local government
and/or the NC Environmental Management Commission before the 401 Water Quality
Certification can be processed. In addition, a 30 foot wide vegetative buffer for low
density development or a 100 foot wide vegetative buffer for high density development
WQC #3402
must be maintained adjacent to all perennial waters except for allowances as provided
under the Water Supply Watershed Protection Rules. For the purposes of this condition,
perennial waters are defined as those shown as perennial waters on the most recent
USGS 1:24,000 topographic map or as otherwise determined by local government
studies;
4. Additional site-specific stormwater management requirements may be added to this
Certification at DWQ's discretion on a case by case basis for projects that have or are
anticipated to have impervious cover of greater than 30 percent. Site-specific stormwater
management shall be designed to remove 85% TSS according to the latest version of
DWQ's Stormwater Best Management Practices manual at a minimum.
Additionally, in watersheds within one mile and draining to 303(d) listed waters, as well as
watersheds that are classified as nutrient sensitive waters (NSW), water supply waters
(WS), trout waters Jr), high quality waters (HQW), and outstanding resource waters
(ORW), the Division shall require that extended detention wetlands, bio-retention areas,
and ponds followed by forested filter strips (designed according to latest version of the NC
DENR Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual) be constructed as part of the
stormwater management plan when a site-specific stormwater management plan is
required.
For streams classified as Water Supply, High Quality Waters and Outstanding Resource
Waters, post-construction, on-site stormwater management shall be required as
appropriate and as outlined in 15A NCAC 2B.0104(m) and 2H .1000 to.1007,
respectively, in addition to that required in this General Certification.
Alternative designs may be requested by the applicant and will be reviewed on a case-by-
case basis by the Division of Water Quality.
Approval of stormwater management plans by the Division of Water Quality's other
existing state stormwater programs including appropriate local programs are sufficient to
satisfy this Condition as long as the stormwater management plans meet or exceed the
design requirements specified in this condition. This condition applies unless more
stringent requirements are in effect from other state water quality programs.
• Unless specified otherwise in the approval letter, the final, written stormwater
management plan shall be approved in writing by the Division of Water Quality's
Wetlands Unit before the impacts specified in this Certification occur.
• The facilities must be designed to treat the runoff from the entire project, unless
otherwise explicitly approved by the Division of Water Quality.
• Also, before any permanent building or other structure is occupied at the subject site,
the facilities (as approved by the Wetlands Unit) shall be constructed and operational,
and the stormwater management plan (as approved by the Wetlands Unit) shall be
implemented.
• The structural stormwater practices as approved by the Wetlands Unit as well as
drainage patterns must be maintained in perpetuity.
• No changes to the structural stormwater practices shall be made without written
authorization from the Division of Water Quality.
5. Compensatory stream mitigation shall be required at a 1:1 ratio for not only perennial but
also intermittent stream impacts that require application to DWQ in watersheds classified
as ORW, HQW, Tr, WS-I and WS-II unless the project is a linear, publicly-funded
transportation project, which has a 150-foot per-stream impact allowance;
6. In accordance with North Carolina General Statute Section 143-215.3D(e), any
application for a 401 Water Quality Certification must include the appropriate fee. If a
WQC #3402
project also requires a CAMA Permit, one payment to both agencies shall be submitted
and will be the higher of the two fees;
7. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) compensatory mitigation may be
required for impacts to 150 linear feet or more of streams and/or one acre or more of
wetlands for an entire project. For linear public transportation projects, impacts equal to
or exceeding 150 feet per stream may require mitigation. In addition, buffer mitigation
may be required for any project with Riparian Area Protection Rules (Buffer Rules) in
effect at the time of application for buffer impacts resulting from activities classified as
"allowable with mitigation" within the "Table of Uses" section of the Buffer Rules or require
a variance under the Buffer Rules. A determination of buffer, wetland and stream
mitigation requirements shall be made for any Certification for this Nationwide Permit.
The most current design and monitoring protocols from DWQ shall be followed and written
plans submitted for DWQ approval as required in those protocols. When compensatory
mitigation is required for a project, the mitigation plans must be approved by DWQ in
writing before the impacts approved by the Certification occur, unless otherwise specified
in the approval letter. The mitigation plan must be implemented and/or constructed before
any permanent building or structure on site is occupied. In the case of public road
projects, the mitigation plan must be implemented before the road is opened to the
travelling public. Please note that if a stream relocation is conducted as a stream
restoration as defined in The Internal Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina ,
April 2001, the restored length can be used as compensatory mitigation for the impacts
resulting from the relocation;
For any project involving re-alignment of streams, a stream relocation plan must be
included with the 401 application for written DWQ approval. Relocated stream designs
should include the same dimensions, patterns and profiles as the existing channel (or a
stable reference reach if the existing channel is unstable), to the maximum extent
practical. The new channel should be constructed in the dry and water shall not be turned
into the new channel until the banks are stabilized. Vegetation used for bank stabilization
shall be limited to native woody species, and should include establishment of a 30 foot
wide wooded and an adjacent 20 foot wide vegetated buffer on both sides of the relocated
channel to the maximum extent practical. A transitional phase incorporating coir fiber and
seedling establishment is allowable. Also, rip-rap, A-Jacks, concrete, gabions or other
hard structures may be allowed if it is necessary to maintain the physical integrity of the
stream, but the applicant must provide written justification and any calculations used to
determine the extent of rip-rap coverage requested. If suitable stream mitigation is not
practical on-site, then stream impact will need to be mitigated elsewhere. Please note
that if a stream relocation is conducted as a stream restoration as defined in The Internal
Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina , April 2001, the restored length can
be used as compensatory mitigation for the impacts resulting from the relocation;
9. Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands must be
placed below the elevation of the streambed to allow low flow passage of water and
aquatic life unless it can be shown to DWQ that providing passage would be impractical.
Design and placement of culverts including open bottom or bottomless arch culverts and
other structures including temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a
manner that may result in aggradation, degradation or significant changes in hydrology of
wetlands or stream beds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and down stream of the above
structures. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the equilibrium shall be
maintained if requested to do so in writing by DWQ. Additionally, when roadways,
causeways or other fill projects are constructed across FEMA-designated floodways or
wetlands, openings such as culverts or bridges must be provided to maintain the natural
hydrology of the system as well as prevent constriction of the floodway that may result in
aggradation, degradation or significant changes in hydrology of streams or wetlands;
WQC #3402
10. That appropriate sediment and erosion control practices which equal or exceed those
outlined in the most recent version of the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Planning and Design Manual" or the "North Carolina Surface Mining Manual" whichever is
more appropriate (available from the Division of Land Resources (DLR) in the DENR
Regional or Central Offices) shall be in full compliance with all specifications governing
the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management
Practices in order to assure compliance with the appropriate turbidity water quality
standard;
11. All sediment and erosion control measures placed in wetlands and waters shall be
removed and the original grade restored within two months after the Division of Land
Resources has released the project;
12. That additional site-specific conditions may be added to projects proposed under this
Certification in order to ensure compliance with all applicable water quality and effluent
standards;
13. Measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete from coming into contact
with waters of the state until the concrete has hardened;
14. If an environmental document is required, this Certification is not valid until a Finding of
No Significant Impact (FONSI) or Record of Decision (ROD) is issued by the State
Clearinghouse;
15. If this Certification is used to access building sites, all lots owned by the applicant must be
buildable without additional fill beyond that explicitly allowed under other General
Certifications. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the lots are buildable
without requiring additional impacts to wetlands, waters or buffers if required to do so in
writing by DWQ. For road construction purposes, this Certification shall only be utilized
from natural high ground to natural high ground;
16. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all lots with remaining
jurisdictional wetlands and waters or areas within 50 feet of all streams and ponds. These
mechanisms shall be put in place within 30 days of the date of issuance of the 401
Certification letter or the issuance of the 404 Permit (whichever is later). A sample deed
notification format can be downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands . DWQ shall be sent copies of all deed restrictions
applied to these lots;
17. When written concurrence is required, the applicant is required to use the most recent
version of the Certification of Completion form to notify DWQ when all work included in the
401 Certification has been completed;
18. Concurrence from DWQ that this Certification applies to an individual project shall expire
three years from the date of the cover letter from DWQ or on the same day as the
expiration date of the corresponding Nationwide Permit 18, 39, 41, 42, 43 or 44,
whichever is sooner.
WQC #3402
Non-compliance with or violation of the conditions herein set forth by a specific fill project
may result in revocation of this Certification for the project and may also result in criminal and/or
civil penalties.
The Director of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality may require submission of a
formal application for Individual Certification for any project in this category of activity that
requires written concurrence under this certification, if it is determined that the project is likely to
have a significant adverse effect upon water quality or degrade the waters so that existing uses of
the wetland or downstream waters are precluded.
Public hearings may be held for specific applications or group of applications prior to a
Certification decision if deemed in the public's best interest by the Director of the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality.
Effective date: March 2003
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
By
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Director
WQC # 3402
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandECs.com
September 29, 2006
S&EC Project # 9881.wl
DWQ Project #06-1102
NCDENR-DWQ
Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Parkview Building
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Response to the NCDWQ's Notice of Withdrawal
Roslin Farms
Hoke County
Dear Ms. Karoly:
? :. fc t .? P I
OCT I 1 2006
UEi,,'R - V,VJER QUALITY
1?cTU,F.p? f',=; p STC:4=,i?'J .TER ERA,';CH
On July 6, 2006 we submitted a permit application package to the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
requesting written concurrence to proceed utilizing Nationwide Permits 14 & 18 for proposed impacts to
jurisdictional features. With this application, we copied the NCDWQ with two (2) copies of the application and
supplemental information to satisfy the required notification for utilizing Water Quality Certification (WQC) 3402,
when using NWP 18, which does not require written approval from the NC-DWQ.
On July 25, 2006 we received a request for additional information from the NC-DWQ dated July 19, 2006. This
letter specifically requested a revised Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application, five (5) copies of this
revised PCN and the appropriate fee of $200.00 for the written concurrence to utilized WQC 3404 (NWP 14). No
further information was requested in this letter for the use of WQC 3402 (NWT 18). On August 2, 2006, we
responded with a revised PCN, submitted five (5) copies and the appropriate fee of $200.00.
On August 21, 2006 we received a second request for additional information dated August 15, 2006. In this letter
the avoidance of impacts resulting from ditches #1 and #2 was requested. These impacts are being requested
utilizing WQC 3402 (NWT 18). Because the requested combined impacts to "Waters of the State" are less than 150
linear feet of stream and less than 1/3 acre of wetlands (project east of I-95) and an individual certification was not
requested by the director of the NCDWQ, no written concurrence for proposed impacts resulting from NWP 18 is
required from the NCDWQ. You additionally, requested that the Carolina Bay be shown on the plan sheet. The
Carolina Bay is not going to be impacted,and is being preserved as "open space," however on September 5, 2006
S&EC sent you an overall map indicating the location of the un-impacted Carolina Bay.
On September 12, 2006 we received a Notice of Withdrawal dated September 11, 2006. The letter stated that we did
not provide the requested information as follows.
"Thus office believes that the ditches labeled on the plans as "ditch No. 2 and Ditch No. 3" are not required
and impacts to the wetlands should be avoided. Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts."
As previously stated the ditching impacts were requested utilizing WQC# 3402 (NWT 18). Because the project is
located east of I-95, approval from the NC-DWQ is not required for wetland impacts uiilizing MVP 18 when overall
project impacts are less than 1/3 of an acre or less than 150 linear feet. We do understand that when using NWP 18
written notification to DWQ is required. According to WQC # 3402 the notification requirement is satisfied by
providing two copies of the PCN form to the DWQ at the same time that the PCN form is sent to the US Army
Corps of Engineers. This requirement was satisfied in the initial submittal to the NC-DWQ on July 6, 2006, and
therefore the impacts requesting the use of NWP 18 has been completed as permitted by the USACE.
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Because the written notification to the DWQ was satisfied in July and an individual certification was not requested
within 30 days of the receipt of the written notification, S&EC feels that all of the necessary requirements for WQC
#3402 have been met. Secondarily, because WQC #3402 was completely satisfied in July the overall application
submittal including the request for WQC # 3404 (NWP 14) should not have been withdrawn.
At this time we are currently requesting that the NC-DWQ process our application for WQC #3404 (NWP 14)
including the requested information which was provided by S&EC on September 5 h, 2006. We assume that because
the application was unnecessarily withdrawn that the application fee for the authorization of WQC# 3404 will not be
required.
Please call or email me at CRoiver.<a).SnndEC.con: if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
7?
Chris Flowers
Wetland Scientist
Attachments:
WQC 3402 (copy)
WQC #3402
GENERAL CERTIFICATION FOR PROJECTS ELIGIBLE
FOR CORPS OF ENGINEERS NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 18 (MINOR DISCHARGES)
39 RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENTS),
41 (RESHAPING EXISTING DRAINAGE DITCHES), 42 (RECREATIONAL FACILITIES),
43 (STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES) AND 44 (MINING ACTIVITIES),
AND RIPARIAN AREA PROTECTION RULES (BUFFER RULES)
This General Certification is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401,
Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) Regulations in 15A NCAC 2H, Section .0500 and 15A NCAC 26 .0200 for
the discharge of fill material to waters and adjacent wetland areas or to wetland areas that are not
a part of the surface tributary system to interstate waters or navigable waters of the United States
(i.e., isolated wetlands) as described in 33 CFR 330 Appendix A (B) (18, 39, 41, 42, 43 and 44) of
the Corps of Engineers regulations (i.e., Nationwide Permit No. 39) and for the Riparian Area
Protection Rules (Buffer Rules) in 15A NCAC 2B .0200. This Certification replaces Water Quality
Certification Numbers 3106 and 3108 issued on February 11, 1997, and Water Quality
Certification Number 3287 issued on June 1, 2000 and Water Quality Certification Number 3362
issued March 18, 2002. This WQC is rescinded when the Corps of Engineers re-authorizes
Nationwide Permits 18, 39, 41, 42, 43 or 44 or when deemed appropriate by the Director of DWQ.
The State of North Carolina certifies that the specified category of activity will not violate
applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217
if conducted in accordance with the conditions hereinafter set forth.
Conditions of Certification:
1. Enumerating and Reporting of Impacts:
• Streams - Impacts to streams as determined by the Division of Water Quality shall be
measured as length of the centerline of the normal flow channel. Permanent and/or
temporary stream impacts shall be enumerated on the entire project for all impacts
regardless of which 404 Nationwide Permits are used. Stream relocations and
stream bed and/or bank hardening are considered to be permanent stream impacts.
Any activity that results in a loss of use of stream functions including but not limited to
filling, relocating, flooding, excavation, dredging and complete shading shall be
considered stream impacts. Enumeration of impacts to streams shall include streams
enclosed by bottomless culverts, bottomless arches or other spanning structures
when a 404 Permit is used anywhere in a project unless the entire structure
(including construction impacts) spans the entire bed and both banks of the stream,
is only used for a road, driveway or path crossing, and is not mitered to follow the
stream pattern. Impacts for dam footprints and flooding will count toward the
threshold for stream impacts, but flooding upstream of the dam will not (as long as no
filling, excavation, relocation or other modification of the existing stream dimension,
pattern or profile occurs) count towards mitigation requirements. Any filling,
excavation, relocation or other modification of the existing stream (other than
flooding) must re-establish the same dimensions, patterns and profiles of the existing
channel (or those of a stable reference reach if the existing channel is unstable) to
the maximum extent practical.
• Wetlands - Impacts to wetlands as determined by the Division of Water Quality shall
be measured as area. Permanent and/or temporary wetland impacts shall be
enumerated on the entire project for all impacts regardless of which 404 Nationwide
Permits are used. Any activity that results in a loss of use of wetland functions
including but not limited to filling, excavating, draining, and flooding shall be
considered wetland impacts. Enumeration of impacts to wetlands shall include
activities that change the hydrology of a wetland when a 404 Permit is used
anywhere in a project.
WQC #3402
• Lakes and Ponds - Impacts to waters other than streams and wetlands as
determined by the Division of Water Quality shall be measured as area. Permanent
and/or temporary water impacts shall be enumerated on the entire project for all
impacts proposed regardless of which 404 Nationwide Permits are used. Any activity
that results in a loss of use of aquatic functions including but not limited to filling and
dredging shall be considered waters impacts.
Application Thresholds - Stream, wetland and water impacts that exceed any of the
thresholds below require a complete application and written concurrence to use this
Certification:
• Total stream impacts of greater or equal to 150 cumulative feet of stream length for
the entire project require written notification to and approval by the Division of Water
Quality, and/or
• Impacts to waters of equal to or greater than 1/3 of an acre require written notification
to and approval by the Division of Water Quality, and/or
• Wetland impacts of greater or equal to 1/3 of an acre east of 1-95 and 1/10 of an acre
west of 1-95 require written notification to and approval by the Division of Water
Quality except as specified below. Any impacts to wetlands adjacent to waters
designated as ORW, SA, WS-I, WS-11 or Trout or are designated as a North Carolina
or National Wild and Scenic River and wetlands classified as SWL and/or UWL as
well as wetlands described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (e) require a complete application
and written concurrence from the Division of Water Quality to use this Certification.
These thresholds apply for the entire project regardless of the number of Nationwide
Permits applicable to the Certification that are issued by the USACE for the project;
• Written notification to DWQ is required for all applications that propose to use
Nationwide Permit 18. This notification requirement will be satisfied by providing two
(2) copies of the PCN form to DWQ at the same time that the PCN form is sent to the
US Army Corps of Engineers. A formal application and fee is not required unless
DWQ decides that an Individual Certification will be required for the project. In this
case, the applicant will be notified in writing from DWQ within 30 days of the receipt
of the written notification.
• Proposed fill or substantial modification of any amount of wetlands classified in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2B.0101(e)(7) as Unique Wetlands (UWL) shall require
written concurrence from the Division of Water Quality;
2. Impacts to any stream length in the Neuse, Tar-Pamlico or Randleman River Basins (or
any other major river basins with Riparian Area Protection Rules [Buffer Rules] in effect at
the time of application) requires written concurrence for this Certification from DWQ in
accordance with 15A NCAC 26.0200. Activities listed as "exempt" from these rules do not
need to apply for written concurrence under this Certification. New development activities
located in the protected 50-foot wide riparian areas (whether jurisdictional wetlands or not)
within the Neuse and Tar-Pamlico River Basins shall be limited to "uses" identified within
and constructed in accordance with 15A NCAC 2B .0200. All new development shall be
located, designed, constructed, and maintained to have minimal disturbance to protect
water quality to the maximum extent practicable through the use of best management
practices;
3. Irrespective of other application thresholds in this General Certification, all impacts to
perennial waters and their associated buffers require written approval from DWQ since
such impacts are allowable as provided in 15A NCAC 2B. 0212 (WS-1), 213.0213 (WS-II),
2B .0214 (WS-III) and 213.0215 (WS-IV). Only water dependent activities, public projects
and structures with diminimus increases in impervious surfaces will be allowed as outlined
in those rules. All other activities require a variance from the delegated local government
and/or the NC Environmental Management Commission before the 401 Water Quality
Certification can be processed. In addition, a 30 foot wide vegetative buffer for low
density development or a 100 foot wide vegetative buffer for high density development
WQC #3402
must be maintained adjacent to all perennial waters except for allowances as provided
under the Water Supply Watershed Protection Rules. For the purposes of this condition,
perennial waters are defined as those shown as perennial waters on the most recent
USGS 1:24,000 topographic map or as otherwise determined by local government
studies;
4. Additional site-specific stormwater management requirements may be added to this
Certification at DWQ's discretion on a case by case basis for projects that have or are
anticipated to have impervious cover of greater than 30 percent. Site-specific stormwater
management shall be designed to remove 85% TSS according to the latest version of
DWQ's Stormwater Best Management Practices manual at a minimum.
Additionally, in watersheds within one mile and draining to 303(d) listed waters, as well as
watersheds that are classified as nutrient sensitive waters (NSW), water supply waters
(WS), trout waters Jr), high quality waters (HQW), and outstanding resource waters
(ORW), the Division shall require that extended detention wetlands, bio-retention areas,
and ponds followed by forested filter strips (designed according to latest version of the NC
DENR Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual) be constructed as part of the
stormwater management plan when a site-specific stormwater management plan is
required.
For streams classified as Water Supply, High Quality Waters and Outstanding Resource
Waters, post-construction, on-site stormwater management shall be required as
appropriate and as outlined in 15A NCAC 2B .0104(m) and 2H .1000 to .1007,
respectively, in addition to that required in this General Certification.
Alternative designs may be requested by the applicant and will be reviewed on a case-by-
case basis by the Division of Water Quality.
Approval of stormwater management plans by the Division of Water Quality's other
existing state stormwater programs including appropriate local programs are sufficient to
satisfy this Condition as long as the stormwater management plans meet or exceed the
design requirements specified in this condition. This condition applies unless more
stringent requirements are in effect from other state water quality programs.
• Unless specified otherwise in the approval letter, the final, written stormwater
management plan shall be approved in writing by the Division of Water Quality's
Wetlands Unit before the impacts specified in this Certification occur.
• The facilities must be designed to treat the runoff from the entire project, unless
otherwise explicitly approved by the Division of Water Quality.
• Also, before any permanent building or other structure is occupied at the subject site,
the facilities (as approved by the Wetlands Unit) shall be constructed and operational,
and the stormwater management plan (as approved by the Wetlands Unit) shall be
implemented.
• The structural stormwater practices as approved by the Wetlands Unit as well as
drainage patterns must be maintained in perpetuity.
• No changes to the structural stormwater practices shall be made without written
authorization from the Division of Water Quality.
5. Compensatory stream mitigation shall be required at a 1:1 ratio for not only perennial but
also intermittent stream impacts that require application to DWQ in watersheds classified
as ORW, HQW, Tr, WS-1 and WS-II unless the project is a linear, publicly-funded
transportation project, which has a 150-foot per-stream impact allowance;
6. In accordance with North Carolina General Statute Section 143-215.3D(e), any
application for a 401 Water Quality Certification must include the appropriate fee. If a
WQC #3402
project also requires a CAMA Permit, one payment to both agencies shall be submitted
and will be the higher of the two fees;
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) compensatory mitigation may be
required for impacts to 150 linear feet or more of streams and/or one acre or more of
wetlands for an entire project. For linear public transportation projects, impacts equal to
or exceeding 150 feet per stream may require mitigation. In addition, buffer mitigation
may be required for any project with Riparian Area Protection Rules (Buffer Rules) in
effect at the time of application for buffer impacts resulting from activities classified as
"allowable with mitigation" within the "Table of Uses" section of the Buffer Rules or require
a variance under the Buffer Rules. A determination of buffer, wetland and stream
mitigation requirements shall be made for any Certification for this Nationwide Permit.
The most current design and monitoring protocols from DWQ shall be followed and written
plans submitted for DWQ approval as required in those protocols. When compensatory
mitigation is required for a project, the mitigation plans must be approved by DWQ in
writing before the impacts approved by the Certification occur, unless otherwise specified
in the approval letter. The mitigation plan must be implemented and/or constructed before
any permanent building or structure on site is occupied. In the case of public road
projects, the mitigation plan must be implemented before the road is opened to the
travelling public. Please note that if a stream relocation is conducted as a stream
restoration as defined in The Internal Technical Guido for Stream Work in North Carolina ,
April 2001, the restored length can be used as compensatory mitigation for the impacts
resulting from the relocation;
8. For any project involving re-alignment of streams, a stream relocation plan must be
included with the 401 application for written DWQ approval. Relocated stream designs
should include the same dimensions, patterns and profiles as the existing channel (or a
stable reference reach if the existing channel is unstable), to the maximum extent
practical. The new channel should be constructed in the dry and water shall not be turned
into the new channel until the banks are stabilized. Vegetation used for bank stabilization
shall be limited to native woody species, and should include establishment of a 30 foot
wide wooded and an adjacent 20 foot wide vegetated buffer on both sides of the relocated
channel to the maximum extent practical. A transitional phase incorporating coir fiber and
seedling establishment is allowable. Also, rip-rap, A-Jacks, concrete, gabions or other
hard structures may be allowed if it is necessary to maintain the physical integrity of the
stream, but the applicant must provide written justification and any calculations used to
determine the extent of rip-rap coverage requested. If suitable stream mitigation is not
practical on-site, then stream impact will need to be mitigated elsewhere. Please note
that if a stream relocation is conducted as a stream restoration as defined in The Internal
Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina , April 2001, the restored length can
be used as compensatory mitigation for the impacts resulting from the relocation;
9. Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands must be
placed below the elevation of the streambed to allow low flow passage of water and
aquatic life unless it can be shown to DWQ that providing passage would be impractical.
Design and placement of culverts including open bottom or bottomless arch culverts and
other structures including temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a
manner that may result in aggradation, degradation or significant changes in hydrology of
wetlands or stream beds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and down stream of the above
structures. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the equilibrium shall be
maintained if requested to do so in writing by DWQ. Additionally, when roadways,
causeways or other fill projects are constructed across FEMA-designated floodways or
wetlands, openings such as culverts or bridges must be provided to maintain the natural
hydrology of the system as well as prevent constriction of the floodway that may result in
aggradation, degradation or significant changes in hydrology of streams or wetlands;
WQC #3402
10. That appropriate sediment and erosion control practices which equal or exceed those
outlined in the most recent version of the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Planning and Design Manual" or the "North Carolina Surface Mining Manual" whichever is
more appropriate (available from the Division of Land Resources (DLR) in the DENR
Regional or Central Offices) shall be in full compliance with all specifications governing
the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management
Practices in order to assure compliance with the appropriate turbidity water quality
standard;
11. All sediment and erosion control measures placed in wetlands and waters shall be
removed and the original grade restored within two months after the Division of Land
Resources has released the project;
12. That additional site-specific conditions may be added to projects proposed under this
Certification in order to ensure compliance with all applicable water quality and effluent
standards;
13. Measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete from coming into contact
with waters of the state until the concrete has hardened;
14. If an environmental document is required, this Certification is not valid until a Finding of
No Significant Impact (FONSI) or Record of Decision (ROD) is issued by the State
Clearinghouse;
15. If this Certification is used to access building sites, all lots owned by the applicant must be
buildable without additional fill beyond that explicitly allowed under other General
Certifications. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the lots are buildable
without requiring additional impacts to wetlands, waters or buffers if required to do so in
writing by DWQ. For road construction purposes, this Certification shall only be utilized
from natural high ground to natural high ground;
16. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all lots with remaining
jurisdictional wetlands and waters or areas within 50 feet of all streams and ponds. These
mechanisms shall be put in place within 30 days of the date of issuance of the 401
Certification letter or the issuance of the 404 Permit (whichever is later). A sample deed
notification format can be downloaded from the 401 /Wetlands Unit web site at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands . DWQ shall be sent copies of all deed restrictions
applied to these lots;
17. When written concurrence is required, the applicant is required to use the most recent
version of the Certification of Completion form to notify DWQ when all work included in the
401 Certification has been completed;
18. Concurrence from DWQ that this Certification applies to an individual project shall expire
three years from the date of the cover letter from DWQ or on the same day as the
expiration date of the corresponding Nationwide Permit 18, 39, 41, 42, 43 or 44,
whichever is sooner.
WQC #3402
Non-compliance with or violation of the conditions herein set forth by a specific fill project
may result in revocation of this Certification for the project and may also result in criminal and/or
civil penalties.
The Director of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality may require submission of a
formal application for Individual Certification for any project in this category of activity that
requires written concurrence under this certification, if it is determined that the project is likely to
have a significant adverse effect upon water quality or degrade the waters so that existing uses of
the wetland or downstream waters are precluded.
Public hearings may be held for specific applications or group of applications prior to a
Certification decision if deemed in the public's best interest by the Director of the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality.
Effective date: March 2003
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
By
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Director
WQC # 3402
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEO-.com
September 29, 2006
S&EC Project # 988 Lwl
DWQ Project 06-1102
NCDENR-DWQ
Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Parkview Building
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Response to the NCDWQ's Notice of Withdrawal
Roslin Farms
Hokc County
Dear Ms. Karoly:
OCT 1 1 2006
DE-11:k - V,VATEii CUALITY
On July 6, 2006 we submitted a permit application package to the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
requesting written concurrence to proceed utilizing Nationwide Permits 14 & 18 for proposed impacts to
jurisdictional features. With this application, we copied the NCDWQ with two (2) copies of the application and
supplemental information to satisfy the required notification for utilizing Water Quality Certification (WQC) 3402,
when using NWP 18, which does not require written approval from the NC-DWQ.
On July 25, 2006 we received a request for additional information from the NC-DWQ dated July 19, 2006. This
letter specifically requested a revised Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application, five (5) copies of this
revised PCN and the appropriate fee of $200.00 for the written concurrence to utilized WQC 3404 (NWP 14). No
further information was requested in this letter for the use of WQC 3402 (NWP 18). On August 2, 2006, we
responded with a revised PCN, submitted five (5) copies and the appropriate fee of $200.00.
On August 21, 2006 we received a second request for additional information dated August 15, 2006. In this letter
the avoidance of impacts resulting from ditches #1 and #2 was requested. These impacts are being requested
utilizing WQC 3402 (NWT 18). Because the requested combined impacts to "Waters of the State" are less than 150
linear feet of stream and less than 1/3 acre of wetlands (project east of I-95) and an individual certification was not
requested by the director of the NCDWQ, no written concurrence for proposed impacts resulting from NWP 18 is
required from the NCDWQ. You additionally, requested that the Carolina Bay be shown on the plan sheet. The
Carolina Bay is not going to be impacted and is being preserved as "open space," however on September 5, 2006
S&EC sent you an overall map indicating the location of the un-impacted Carolina Bay.
On September 12, 2006 we received a Notice of Withdrawal dated September 11, 2006. The letter stated that we did
not provide the requested information as follows.
"This office believes that the ditches labeled on the plans as "ditch No. 2 and Ditch No. 3" are not required
and impacts to the wetlands should be avoided. Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts."
As previously stated the ditching impacts were requested utilizing WQC# 3402 (NWT 18). Because die project is
located east of I-95, approval from the NC-DWQ is not required for wetland impacts uiilizing NWP 18 when overall
project impacts are less than 1/3 of an acre or less than 150 linear feet. We do understand that when using NWP 18
written notification to DWQ is required. According to WQC # 3402 the notification requirement is satisfied by
providing two copies of the PCN form to the DWQ at the same time that the PCN form is sent to the US Army
Corps of Engineers. This requirement was satisfied in the initial submittal to the NC-DWQ on July 6, 2006, and
therefore the impacts requesting the use of NWP 18 has been completed as pennitted by the USACE.
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E La?vndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Because the written notification to the DWQ was satisfied in July and an individual certification was not requested
within 30 days of the receipt of the written notification, S&EC feels that all of the necessary requirements for WQC
#3402 have been met. Secondarily, because WQC #3402 was completely satisfied in July the overall application
submittal including the request for WQC # 3404 (NWP 14) should not have been withdrawn.
At this time we are currently requesting that the NC-DWQ process our application for WQC #3404 (NWP 14)
including the requested information which was provided by S&EC on September 5 h, 2006. We assume that because
the application was unnecessarily withdrawn that the application fee for the authorization of WQC# 3404 will not be
required.
Please call or email me at CFlnwera(a-?,VandEC.conr if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
7-All
Chris Flowers
Wetland Scientist
Attachments:
WQC 3402 (copy)
WQC #3402
GENERAL CERTIFICATION FOR PROJECTS ELIGIBLE
FOR CORPS OF ENGINEERS NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 18 (MINOR DISCHARGES)
39 (RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENTS),
41 (RESHAPING EXISTING DRAINAGE DITCHES), 42 (RECREATIONAL FACILITIES),
43_(STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES) AND 44 (MINING ACTIVITIES).
AND RIPARIAN AREA PROTECTION RULES (BUFFER RULES)
This General Certification is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401,
Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) Regulations in 15A NCAC 2H, Section .0500 and 15A NCAC 26 .0200 for
the discharge of fill material to waters and adjacent wetland areas or to wetland areas that are not
a part of the surface tributary system to interstate waters or navigable waters of the United States
(i.e., isolated wetlands) as described in 33 CFR 330 Appendix A (B) (18, 39, 41, 42, 43 and 44) of
the Corps of Engineers regulations (i.e., Nationwide Permit No. 39) and for the Riparian Area
Protection Rules (Buffer Rules) in 15A NCAC 2B .0200. This Certification replaces Water Quality
Certification Numbers 3106 and 3108 issued on February 11, 1997, and Water Quality
Certification Number 3287 issued on June 1, 2000 and Water Quality Certification Number 3362
issued March 18, 2002. This WQC is rescinded when the Corps of Engineers re-authorizes
Nationwide Permits 18, 39, 41, 42, 43 or 44 or when deemed appropriate by the Director of DWQ.
The State of North Carolina certifies that the specified category of activity will not violate
applicable portions of Sections 301, 302; 303, 306 and 307 of the Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217
if conducted in accordance with the conditions hereinafter set forth.
Conditions of Certification:
1. Enumerating and Reporting of Impacts:
• Streams - Impacts to streams as determined by the Division of Water Quality shall be
measured as length of the centerline of the normal flow channel. Permanent and/or
temporary stream impacts shall be enumerated on the entire project for all impacts
regardless of which 404 Nationwide Permits are used. Stream relocations and
stream bed and/or bank hardening are considered to be permanent stream impacts.
Any activity that results in a loss of use of stream functions including but not limited to
filling, relocating, flooding, excavation, dredging and complete shading shall be
considered stream impacts. Enumeration of impacts to streams shall include streams
enclosed by bottomless culverts, bottomless arches or other spanning structures
when a 404 Permit is used anywhere in a project unless the entire structure
(including construction impacts) spans the entire bed and both banks of the stream,
is only used for a road, driveway or path crossing, and is not mitered to follow the
stream pattern. Impacts for dam footprints and flooding will count toward the
threshold for stream impacts, but flooding upstream of the dam will not (as long as no
filling, excavation, relocation or other modification of the existing stream dimension,
pattern or profile occurs) count towards mitigation requirements. Any filling,
excavation, relocation or other modification of the existing stream (other than
flooding) must re-establish the same dimensions, patterns and profiles of the existing
channel (or those of a stable reference reach if the existing channel is unstable) to
the maximum extent practical.
• Wetlands - Impacts to wetlands as determined by the Division of Water Quality shall
be measured as area. Permanent and/or temporary wetland impacts shall be
enumerated on the entire project for all impacts regardless of which 404 Nationwide
Permits are used. Any activity that results in a loss of use of wetland functions
including but not limited to filling, excavating, draining, and flooding shall be
considered wetland impacts. Enumeration of impacts to wetlands shall include
activities that change the hydrology of a wetland when a 404 Permit is used
anywhere in a project.
WQC #3402
• Lakes and Ponds - Impacts to waters other than streams and wetlands as
determined by the Division of Water Quality shall be measured as area. Permanent
and/or temporary water impacts shall be enumerated on the entire project for all
impacts proposed regardless of which 404 Nationwide Permits are used. Any activity
that results in a loss of use of aquatic functions including but not limited to filling and
dredging shall be considered waters impacts.
Application Thresholds - Stream, wetland and water impacts that exceed any of the
thresholds below require a complete application and written concurrence to use this
Certification:
• Total stream impacts of greater or equal to 150 cumulative feet of stream length for
the entire project require written notification to and approval by the Division of Water
Quality, and/or
• Impacts to waters of equal to or greater than 1/3 of an acre require written notification
to and approval by the Division of Water Quality, and/or
• Wetland impacts of greater or equal to 1/3 of an acre east of 1-95 and 1/10 of an acre
west of 1-95 require written notification to and approval by the Division of Water
Quality except as specified below. Any impacts to wetlands adjacent to waters
designated as ORW, SA, WS-1, WS-11 or Trout or are designated as a North Carolina
or National Wild and Scenic River and wetlands classified as SWL and/or UWL as
well as wetlands described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (e) require a complete application
and written concurrence from the Division of Water Quality to use this Certification.
These thresholds apply for the entire project regardless of the number of Nationwide
Permits applicable to the Certification that are issued by the USACE for the project;
• Written notification to DWQ is required for all applications that propose to use
Nationwide Permit 18. This notification requirement will be satisfied by providing two
(2) copies of the PCN form to DWQ at the same time that the PCN form is sent to the
US Army Corps of Engineers. A formal application and fee is not required unless
DWQ decides that an Individual Certification will be required for the project. In this
case, the applicant will be notified in writing from DWQ within 30 days of the receipt
of the written notification.
• Proposed fill or substantial modification of any amount of wetlands classified in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2B .0101(e)(7) as Unique Wetlands (UWL) shall require
written concurrence from the Division of Water Quality;
2. Impacts to any stream length in the Neuse, Tar-Pamlico or Randleman River Basins (or
any other major river basins with Riparian Area Protection Rules [Buffer Rules] in effect at
the time of application) requires written concurrence for this Certification from DWQ in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2B.0200. Activities listed as "exempt" from these rules do not
need to apply for written concurrence under this Certification. New development activities
located in the protected 50-foot wide riparian areas (whether jurisdictional wetlands or not)
within the Neuse and Tar-Pamlico River Basins shall be limited to "uses" identified within
and constructed in accordance with 15A NCAC 2B .0200. All new development shall be
located, designed, constructed, and maintained to have minimal disturbance to protect
water quality to the maximum extent practicable through the use of best management
practices;
3. Irrespective of other application thresholds in this General Certification, all impacts to
perennial waters and their associated buffers require written approval from DWQ since
such impacts are allowable as provided in 15A NCAC 2B. 0212 (WS-1), 213.0213 (WS-11),
2B.0214 (WS-III) and 26 .0215 (WS-IV). Only water dependent activities, public projects
and structures with diminimus increases in impervious surfaces will be allowed as outlined
in those rules. All other activities require a variance from the delegated local government
and/or the NC Environmental Management Commission before the 401 Water Quality
Certification can be processed. In addition, a 30 foot wide vegetative buffer for low
density development or a 100 foot wide vegetative buffer for high density development
WQC #3402
must be maintained adjacent to all perennial waters except for allowances as provided
under the Water Supply Watershed Protection Rules. For the purposes of this condition,
perennial waters are defined as those shown as perennial waters on the most recent
USGS 1:24,000 topographic map or as otherwise determined by local government
studies;
4. Additional site-specific stormwater management requirements may be added to this
Certification at DWQ's discretion on a case by case basis for projects that have or are
anticipated to have impervious cover of greater than 30 percent. Site-specific stormwater
management shall be designed to remove 85% TSS according to the latest version of
DWQ's Stormwater Best Management Practices manual at a minimum.
Additionally, in watersheds within one mile and draining to 303(d) listed waters, as well as
watersheds that are classified as nutrient sensitive waters (NSW), water supply waters
(WS), trout waters Jr), high quality waters (HQW), and outstanding resource waters
(ORW), the Division shall require that extended detention wetlands, bio-retention areas,
and ponds followed by forested filter strips (designed according to latest version of the NC
DENR Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual) be constructed as part of the
stormwater management plan when a site-specific stormwater management plan is
required.
For streams classified as Water Supply, High Quality Waters and Outstanding Resource
Waters, post-construction, on-site stormwater management shall be required as
appropriate and as outlined in 15A NCAC 2B .0104(m) and 2H .1000 to .1007,
respectively, in addition to that required in this General Certification.
Alternative designs may be requested by the applicant and will be reviewed on a case-by-
case basis by the Division of Water Quality.
Approval of stormwater management plans by the Division of Water Quality's other
existing state stormwater programs including appropriate local programs are sufficient to
satisfy this Condition as long as the stormwater management plans meet or exceed the
design requirements specified in this condition. This condition applies unless more
stringent requirements are in effect from other state water quality programs.
• Unless specified otherwise in the approval letter, the final, written stormwater
management plan shall be approved in writing by the Division of Water Quality's
Wetlands Unit before the impacts specified in this Certification occur.
• The facilities must be designed to treat the runoff from the entire project, unless
otherwise explicitly approved by the Division of Water Quality.
• Also, before any permanent building or other structure is occupied at the subject site,
the facilities (as approved by the Wetlands Unit) shall be constructed and operational,
and the stormwater management plan (as approved by the Wetlands Unit) shall be
implemented.
• The structural stormwater practices as approved by the Wetlands Unit as well as
drainage patterns must be maintained in perpetuity.
• No changes to the structural stormwater practices shall be made without written
authorization from the Division of Water Quality.
5. Compensatory stream mitigation shall be required at a 1:1 ratio for not only perennial but
also intermittent stream impacts that require application to DWQ in watersheds classified
as ORW, HQW, Tr, WS-1 and WS-II unless the project is a linear, publicly-funded
transportation project, which has a 150-foot per-stream impact allowance;
6. In accordance with North Carolina General Statute Section 143-215.3D(e), any
application for a 401 Water Quality Certification must include the appropriate fee. If a
WQC #3402
project also requires a CAMA Permit, one payment to both agencies shall be submitted
and will be the higher of the two fees;
7. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) compensatory mitigation may be
required for impacts to 150 linear feet or more of streams and/or one acre or more of
wetlands for an entire project. For linear public transportation projects, impacts equal to
or exceeding 150 feet per stream may require mitigation. In addition, buffer mitigation
may be required for any project with Riparian Area Protection Rules (Buffer Rules) in
effect at the time of application for buffer impacts resulting from activities classified as
"allowable with mitigation" within the "Table of Uses" section of the Buffer Rules or require
a variance under the Buffer Rules. A determination of buffer, wetland and stream
mitigation requirements shall be made for any Certification for this Nationwide Permit.
The most current design and monitoring protocols from DWQ shall be followed and written
plans submitted for DWQ approval as required in those protocols. When compensatory
mitigation is required for a project, the mitigation plans must be approved by DWQ in
writing before the impacts approved by the Certification occur, unless otherwise specified
in the approval letter. The mitigation plan must be implemented and/or constructed before
any permanent building or structure on site is occupied. In the case of public road
projects, the mitigation plan must be implemented before the road is opened to the
travelling public. Please note that if a stream relocation is conducted as a stream
restoration as defined in The Internal Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina ,
April 2001, the restored length can be used as compensatory mitigation for the impacts
resulting from the relocation;
8. For any project involving re-alignment of streams, a stream relocation plan must be
included with the 401 application for written DWQ approval. Relocated stream designs
should include the same dimensions, patterns and profiles as the existing channel (or a
stable reference reach if the existing channel is unstable), to the maximum extent
practical. The new channel should be constructed in the dry and water shall not be turned
into the new channel until the banks are stabilized. Vegetation used for bank stabilization
shall be limited to native woody species, and should include establishment of a 30 foot
wide wooded and an adjacent 20 foot wide vegetated buffer on both sides of the relocated
channel to the maximum extent practical. A transitional phase incorporating coir fiber and
seedling establishment is allowable. Also, rip-rap, A-Jacks, concrete, gabions or other
hard structures may be allowed if it is necessary to maintain the physical integrity of the
stream, but the applicant must provide written justification and any calculations used to
determine the extent of rip-rap coverage requested. If suitable stream mitigation is not
practical on-site, then stream impact will need to be mitigated elsewhere. Please note
that if a stream relocation is conducted as a stream restoration as defined in The Internal
Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina , April 2001, the restored length can
be used as compensatory mitigation for the impacts resulting from the relocation;
9. Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands must be
placed below the elevation of the streambed to allow low flow passage of water and
aquatic life unless it can be shown to DWQ that providing passage would be impractical.
Design and placement of culverts including open bottom or bottomless arch culverts and
other structures including temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a
manner that may result in aggradation, degradation or significant changes in hydrology of
wetlands or stream beds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and down stream of the above
structures. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the equilibrium shall be
maintained if requested to do so in writing by DWQ. Additionally, when roadways,
causeways or other fill projects are constructed across FEMA-designated floodways or
wetlands, openings such as culverts or bridges must be provided to maintain the natural
hydrology of the system as well as prevent constriction of the floodway that may result in
aggradation, degradation or significant changes in hydrology of streams or wetlands;
WQC #3402
10. That appropriate sediment and erosion control practices which equal or exceed those
outlined in the most recent version of the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Planning and Design Manual" or the "North Carolina Surface Mining Manual" whichever is
more appropriate (available from the Division of Land Resources (DLR) in the DENR
Regional or Central Offices) shall be in full compliance with all specifications governing
the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management
Practices in order to assure compliance with the appropriate turbidity water quality
standard;
11. All sediment and erosion control measures placed in wetlands and waters shall be
removed and the original grade restored within two months after the Division of Land
Resources has released the project;
12. That additional site-specific conditions may be added to projects proposed under this
Certification in order to ensure compliance with all applicable water quality and effluent
standards;
13. Measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete from coming into contact
with waters of the state until the concrete has hardened;
14. If an environmental document is required, this Certification is not valid until a Finding of
No Significant Impact (FONSI) or Record of Decision (ROD) is issued by the State
Clearinghouse;
15. If this Certification is used to access building sites, all lots owned by the applicant must be
buildable without additional fill beyond that explicitly allowed under other General
Certifications. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the lots are buildable
without requiring additional impacts to wetlands, waters or buffers if required to do so in
writing by DWQ. For road construction purposes, this Certification shall only be utilized
from natural high ground to natural high ground;
16. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all lots with remaining
jurisdictional wetlands and waters or areas within 50 feet of all streams and ponds. These
mechanisms shall be put in place within 30 days of the date of issuance of the 401
Certification letter or the issuance of the 404 Permit (whichever is later). A sample deed
notification format can be downloaded from the 401 /Wetlands Unit web site at
http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands . DWQ shall be sent copies of all deed restrictions
applied to these lots;
17. When written concurrence is required, the applicant is required to use the most recent
version of the Certification of Completion form to notify DWQ when all work included in the
401 Certification has been completed;
18. Concurrence from DWQ that this Certification applies to an individual project shall expire
three years from the date of the cover letter from DWQ or on the same day as the
expiration date of the corresponding Nationwide Permit 18, 39, 41, 42, 43 or 44,
whichever is sooner.
WQC #3402
Non-compliance with or violation of the conditions herein set forth by a specific fill project
may result in revocation of this Certification for the project and may also result in criminal and/or
civil penalties.
The Director of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality may require submission of a
formal application for Individual Certification for any project in this category of activity that
requires written concurrence under this certification, if it is determined that the project is likely to
have a significant adverse effect upon water quality or degrade the waters so that existing uses of
the wetland or downstream waters are precluded.
Public hearings may be held for specific applications or group of applications prior to a
Certification decision if deemed in the public's best interest by the Director of the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality.
Effective date: March 2003
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
By
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Director
WQC # 3402
0? W AT
o -c
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
September 11, 2006
DWQ Project No. 06-1102
Cumberland County
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Ralph Huff
Landfall Partners, LLC
P.O. Box 87555
Fayetteville, NC 28304
Subject Property: Roslin Farms
UT to Cold Camp Creek [030753, 14-22-1-1, C, SW]
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL
Dear Mr. Huff:
On July 6, 2006, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated July
7, 2006 to impact 0.015 acres of wetland and 90 linear feet of perennial stream, to construct
the proposed residential subdivision. On August 2, 2006, the DWQ received additional from
you, however, the DWQ determined that your application remained incomplete and/or
provided inaccurate information, and on August 15, 2006, the DWQ sent correspondence to
you requesting additional information so that this Office could continue to process your
application. This requested information included the following:
Additional Information Requested:
This Office believes that the ditches labeled on the plans as "Ditch No. 2 and Ditch No.
3" are not required and impacts to the wetland should be avoided. Please revise the
plans to avoid the impacts.
The above requested information was not included in your revised PCN application, and as
of today has not been received by the DWQ. Therefore, your file is hereby considered
withdrawn and will not be reviewed until the DWQ's earlier concerns are addressed. The
DWQ will require the additional information listed above in order to process an application
to impact protected wetlands, streams and/or protected riparian buffers on the subject
property. Once you have collected sufficient information to have a complete application you
will need to reapply for DWQ approval. This includes submitting a complete application
package with the appropriate fee.
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: httn://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
One
r Carolina
Np
Nahrmlly
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Landfall Partners, LLC
Page 2 of 2
September 11, 2006
Please be aware that you have no authorization under Section 401 of the Clear Water Act for
this activity and any work done within waters of the state would be a violation of North
Carolina General Statuses and Administrative Code. Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly or Mr.
Ian McMillan at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions or concerns.
Sin e ely,
Cyndi Karoly, Supervisor
i 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBKJUni
cc: Ken Averitte, DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office
USACE Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Chris Flowers, S&EC, P.A., 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
Filename: 061102RoslinFarms(Cumberland) Withdrawn
0
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
Transmittal
To: - tvc,- 01)0
? ? Cyn??ro??
We Transmit to you Herewith:
? Drawings
? Specifications
? Brochures or photos
Correspondence
As per your request
Project M eel' Date: q6k
Project Name: l?n?lin Frnl?
• Dln - l
File:
? For your information and files
? For comment or approval
? Returned.for correction, resubmit
? Approved as noted
Under Separate Cover:
? By.mail
By courier
? By express
No. Copies Document No. Date Description.
s kwaeSf u
Remarks:: Jll , l71 t<?Q
Ck, 17) (4
MVP tail/r N a8 01
If enclosures are not as listed as above, kindly notify us at once.
Q ?%V9
By:
6
A A SEP 6 200
ON-) 1 sN STORA/ER BRAD
Charlotte Office
Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
K Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
F 11010 Raven Ridge Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
September 5, 2006
S&EC Project # 988 Lwl
DWQ Project #06-1102
NCDENR-DWQ
Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Parkview Building
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Response to the NCDWQ's 2"d Request for Additional Information
Roslin Farms
Hoke County
Dear Ms. Karoly:
On July 6, 2006 we submitted a permit application package the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) requesting
written concurrence from the USACE to proceed utilizing Nationwide Permits 14 & 18. With this application, we
copied the NCDWQ with two (2) copies of the application and supplemental information to satisfy the required
notification for utilizing Nationwide Permit (NWP) 18 and Water Quality Certification (WQC) 3402.
On July 25, 2006 we received a request for additional information dated July 19, 2006. This letter specifically
requested a revised Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application, five (5) copies of this revised PCN and the
appropriate fee of $200.00 for the written concurrence to utilized WQC 3404 (NWP 14). No further information
was requested in this letter for the use of WQC 3402 (NWP 18). On August 2, 2006, we responded with a revised
PCN, submitted five (5) copies and the appropriate fee of $200.00.
On August 21, 2006 we received a second request for additional information dated August 15, 2006. In this letter j
you have requested that the impact from ditches #1 and #2 be avoided. These impacts are being requested utilizing
WQC 3402 (NWP 18). Because the requested impacts to "Waters of the State" are less than 150 linear feet of
stream and less than 1/3 acres of wetlands (project east of I-95) and an individual certification was not requested by
the NCDWQ, no written concurrence is required from the NCDWQ.
However, you have additionally, requested that the Carolina Bay be shown on the plan sheet. The Carolina Bay is
not going to be impacted and is being preserved as "open space", attached is an overall map indicating the location
of the un-impacted Carolina Bay.
We anticipate that this answers all of the NCDWQ's questions in order to complete the final review process for a
401 Water Quality Certification. Please call or email me at CF1awersq,VandF.C.coni if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
V?
Chris Flowers
Wetland Scientist
Attachments:
Overall Plan showing Carolina Bay (sheet 1 of 2)
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: (336),540-8235
PB rJO,
PG Tiro
AD. 009, Pa 48f
P.4 24 A2 1J
N 46.44'16"
280.00'

?s''rs•.? 5 A6.A ` 'r. ?s•.
49' <' 49 50 ?Y
OPEN SPACE 48 % 51 52 l` 96
c' 47 -? - 64`•
53
44 1 45 , 46 54
43 I y,' 61 , 61 i
4? 63 56
60 ,
38 39 40 64 ` 59 i 57
371` 41 <' 58
35 36 -PROPOSED' i' 75 ,11 74 65
34 ?SUMVJS10N r 76
, 66
- - - =
-;-2131-?,77 , 73 1\`
`32 15 24 21 78 71 67
-------------
J11 s , 27 26 \1,
68
20
I 79 ..
-I r 28 71
130 19 I \? - -
tr?.\,l r' - , I ,1 \ 69
29 WMANDS BO - J 70
81 i
_ r- 17 OPEN SPACE
P.& 04. ft fn
16 I '
I
.? rs I \
I 10 11 r'' uo,ra Tito
I 11
I 9 r '? ,y1 I ?_
I as J004 Pa 840
6 S 1 82
121.49'-----= 1 ;-------------
I N 14°46'15" - _ :b
J W . 83 I
?
I N 14'28'13" W I
I 109.79' (01.77'
L-------------------A4J-'J7'46" W
sM ?yDY R0. SEE SHEET 2 of 2 8-1130.00'
SITE C4NA0 L=208.17'
c • w 1??iy? RL!
N 02°06'03" W
SR. 2243 118.68'
VICINITY MAP
I
N 00.0556" W
181.52'
S,p
?1?J
\'b1.
LEGEND NOTE: TOTAL AREA OF TRACT IS 1 13.57 ACRES.
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
----------------- PROPOSED SUBDIVISION
Cn
r-n
WFTIANDS MATRIX 5
S1, m
p
: N
BAY (ISOLATED WETLANDS -NON JURISDICTIONAL) ?r m

"This certifies that this copy of this plot identities as waters
of the U.S. or wetlands all areas of waters of the U.S., including
wetlands, regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
as determined by the undersigned on this date. Unless there is a
change in the low or our published regulations, this determination
of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years from this dote. This determination was made
utilizing the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Name:
Title:
Date:
CANAO RCAD.
SHEET 1 o f 2
WETLAND DELINEATION
FOR
ROS.LIIV .L .Z-a S
PROPERTY OF
LANDFALL PARTNERS, LLC
MCLAUCHL/N TWP. HOKE CO., N.C.
SCALE. I"= 400' FEBRUARY 2006
-4CO -200 0 400 800 1200
N.C. P
NO. L-2763
???11/llfff'?R
'Z. ?/
w
- Soil & Environmental Consultants
11010 Raven Ridge Road , PA
Raleil;h North Carolina 27614 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
Transmittal
To: - tyc- OJ I()

We Transmit to you Herewith:
? Drawings
? Specifications .
El Brochures or photos
Correspondence
[[]/
As per your request
Project #: 9o?)/, 11), Date:
Project Name: _ Rdin Frn)?5
oto - 1
File:
Under Separate Cover:
? For your information and files ? By.mail
? For comment or approval By courier
? Returned _for correction, resubmit ? By express
? Approved as noted
A? rip r, c01r
If enclosures are not as listed as above, kindly notify us at once.
nCC??ad[? p
[ D
By: /119 - -
?cc SEP f 2006
UENR - WATER QUALITY
AET1ANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C Greensboro Office:
Concord, NC 28025 3817-1: Lawndale Drive
Phone: [phone] Greensboro, NC 27455
Fax: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Remarks: _Cp: AIC.- l7Yc)Q
0
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com -
September 5, 2006
S&EC Project # 9881.wl
DWQ Project 906-1102
NCDENR-DWQ
Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Park-view Building
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Response to the NCDWQ's 2°a Request for Additional Information
Roslin Farnis
Hoke County
Dear Ms. Karoly:
On July 6, 2006 we submitted a permit application package the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) requesting
written concurrence from the USACE to proceed utilizing Nationwide Permits 14 & 18. With this application, we
copied the NCDWQ with two (2) copies of the application and supplemental information to satisfy the required
notification for utilizing Nationwide Permit (NWP) 18 and Water Quality Certification (WQC) 3402.
On July 25, 2006 we received a request for additional information dated July 19, 2006. This letter specifically
requested a revised Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application, five (5) copies of this revised PCN and the
appropriate fee of $200.00 for the written concurrence to utilized WQC 3404 (NWP 14). No further information
was requested in this letter for the use of WQC 3402 (NWT 18). On August 2, 2006, we responded with a revised
PCN, submitted five (5) copies and the appropriate fee of $200.00.
On August 21, 2006 we received a second request for additional information dated August 15, 2006. In this letter
you have requested that the impact from ditches #1 and #2 be avoided. These impacts are being requested utilizing
WQC 3402 (NWP 18). Because the requested impacts to "Waters of the State" are less than 150 linear feet of
stream and less than 1/3 acres of wetlands (project east of I-95) and an individual certification was not requested by
the NCDWQ, no written concurrence is required from the NCDWQ.
However, you have additionally, requested that the Carolina Bay be shown on the plan sheet. The Carolina Bay is
not going to be impacted and is being preserved as "open space", attached is an overall map indicating the location
of the un-impacted Carolina Bay.
We anticipate that this answers all of the NCDWQ's questions in order to complete the final review process for a
401 Water Quality Certification. Please call or email me at CFlower q,'Vaird C.con: if you have any questions.
Sincerely,

Chris Flowers
Wetland Scientist
Attachments:
• Overall Plan showing Carolina Bay (sheet 1 of 2)
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Me-7 'ON
Y ? 61
w
z"
?• ,? z z"
?•
Z J 0 1 133HE
oozy ooa cool 0 ooz- cool-
soot .(b'b'n6'833 , OOP, =„ l *37VOS
'O'N "00 3NOH 'dhu NnHonvwn
077 `S6(3N1 d dd 77 d3ON d7
30 A-LY3dOdd
SNUVJ iVI7SOcY
2V03
NO11 V3N1730 ONV713M

N ?.
? ?
? cfl Q
?o
n
V tZ ??
n
'S321Od LS'Fl I S/ -LOd2/1 -40 d3YV 74101 ?310N
.td b'ONn o9 .Ub'3dObrd
ON3D37
d V N .(1 /N/OlA
.29 12; l s?tt Vs
Al „F0190.z0 N 6olI r
`y r?rr M „99,90000 N dVROZ=7 ?'r0r?vr? 311S
?s odor, 100 ,09; {rb Z } o Z 133HE 33S ba t0'"`? `??
-------------------?
/ ,LL' Ol 6Z '60;
I
.rte. °'- I M „FI,BZ.fI N I
F8 ; -.- I
M „Sl.9Y.i l N 1 I
------------
--- I
arr w trac pan lB ` " Z ,,`, I ` 4 i 9 '
i 6? s I - - e '\'N
.- - ` zl I
oil vi Vd
01
I sl a,, I
I
------- '1 ' ?_- -?, IN I ICIl?'*# VW
r
of
cc
z
u
z
0
oroa ?orNro
3OVdS N3dO ---', I L! -?
,---------T. - -
ta 4
? al ?.e
OL SONV7131,1
69 0a -- . 6Z
I 61 Ofl Z
SY OZ
L9 lz ,' rz `SZ``
£L r LL
r'
99 _.? 9L i ?NO19PUOanS- r£
S9 \ ` SL` /-- G13SOd0?Jd- " 9£ '
09 r9 - Or 6F ,-'
9; 19 Z9
SS
rs , 9),
,,yam! ',' Zs , --------- ZIP
9r ) -' 3DVdS N3dO
-ff og 6P "g
s?•oi ,, ? y \ ,s?•o` o ?
9yg?b
\ ,00'0BZ
M „91,ff.9f N
/ 6?•OL !ci i eoa"va
S
5d OLl
Bd
:alDp
:19MI
:awDl?
„y0nuoyy uolloaug00 SpuD11aM SJDaUl6u3 JO G600 2961 ayl burzrjgn
apow SDM uorlDUluualap slgl 'alDp Slgl UJOJJ SJDO1 anlj peaW
of lou pouad D Jot uodn pagaJ oq low uo Rpsuinf ppl, uolloaS jo
uo1lDUruiJalap slgl 'suorlDln6aJ pagsrlgnd mo Jo MDl aql u/ a6uDgo
D sl slay) ssalun 'alDp Slgl uO Pau6/SJapun ay} Iq pauiuJJalap SD
1Dd JaIDM UDa/0 ayl JO tpy uo11DaS of luDnsJnd palDln6ai 'spuol#aM
burpnlour ' S n Oql )O WJDM JO SD3JD 11D SPUDIIaM JO •S ? ayl Jo
SJa;DM sD sayrluapl 1Dld slyl jo Adoo sly} 1Dgj SaIJIPRO sryl„
(7VN0/10/OSIYn1' NON - SONV7J3M 031Y]0S1) AVS MMMI
NO/SMIGSnS 03SOd02d -----------------
it oil & Environmental Consultants PA
1010 Raven Ride Road
g Raleigh, NorUi Carolina 27G14 Phone: [phone] Fax: (919) 84G-9467
www.SandEC.com
Transmittal
To: - NL- Oj)0
C ?ra1?
i
We Transmit to you Herewith:
? Drawings
? Specifications .
El WBrochures or photos
Correspondence
[f As per your request
Project M 9O?51, f, )I Date: 188 -
Project Name: l1-W ' Far-mg,
Wo
File:
Under Separate Cover:
? For your information and files ? By-mail
? For comment or approval By courier
? Returned.for correction, resubmit ? By express
? Approved as noted
If enclosures are not as listed as above, kindly notify us at once.
By: Kt?
---/I' ' K SEF b 'Nub
DENT. Q.utUTY
VtiEWDS hi ti S ? CQki AT _R BRANCH
Charlotte Office-
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C Greensboro Office:
Concord, NC 28025 3817-$ Lawndale Drive
Phone: [phone] Greensboro, NC 27455
Fax: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax; [phone]
Remarks:: V
O
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
L www.SandEC.coni
September 5, 2006
S&EC Project # 9881.w1
DWQ Project #06-1102
NCDENR-DWQ
Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Parkview Building
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Response to the NCDWQ's 2°d Request for Additional Information
Roslin Farms
Hoke County
Dear Ms. Karoly:
On July 6, 2006 we submitted a permit application package the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) requesting
written concurrence from the USACE to proceed utilizing Nationwide Permits 14 & 18. With this application, we
copied the NCDWQ with two (2) copies of the application and supplemental information to satisfy the required
notification for utilizing Nationwide Permit (NWP) 18 and Water Quality Certification (WQC) 3402.
On July 25, 2006 we received a request for additional information dated July 19, 2006. This letter specifically
requested a revised Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application, five (5) copies of this revised PCN and the
appropriate fee of $200.00 for the written concurrence to utilized WQC 3404 (NWT 14). No further information
was requested in this letter for the use of WQC 3402 (NWP 18). On August 2, 2006, we responded with a revised
PCN, submitted five (5) copies and the appropriate fee of $200.00.
On August 21, 2006 we received a second request for additional information dated August 15, 2006. In this letter
you have requested that the impact from ditches #1 and #2 be avoided. These impacts are being requested utilizing
WQC 3402 (NW? 18). Because the requested impacts to "Waters of the State" are less than 150 linear feet of
stream and less than 1/3 acres of wetlands (project east of I-95) and an individual certification was not requested by
the NCDWQ, no written concurrence is required from the NCDWQ.
However, you have additionally, requested that the Carolina Bay be shown on the plan sheet. The Carolina Bay is
not going to be impacted and is being preserved as "open space", attached is an overall map indicating the location
of the un-impacted Carolina Bay.
We anticipate that this answers all of the NCDWQ's questions in order to complete the final review process for a
401 Water Quality Certification. Please call or email me at CFlmvers(aklVandF,C.cont if you have any questions.
Sincerely,

Chris Flowers
Wetland Scientist
Attachments:
• Overall Plan showing Carolina Bay (sheet 1 of 2)
Charlotte Office:
236 LcPhillip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
n
v i c1?
6 ? `f UIJ
ip o
D.R W0. Pa •01
P.4 P; M /J
N 46'44'16" W
280.00'
S ?
N 14.28' 13" W 1
109.79' f 01.77'
- - 9 4Jt 7'46" W
2 of 2 R=1130.00'
6.. 6 10?,
f ?, 5 1,6 > - S..
49 1 501' 51 -^- 9
OPEN SPACE S. 4745 52 a`.
/ 46 ?' -r-- t 53 34
44 1' 45 `?'' 'r' `?r `•`C, i•55
43 62 ; 61 <
42-' 56
•' 63
J81 39 40 64 1 59 ; 57 '
,•'
37 % 41 ).' 38 -
' 36 `-- 751' 74 63
r' 351 ` 'PROPOSErl ?' 76 \
34 65
I?32 231727 - ? I 77 73
i > 24, 67
21
251` 7a 17
72
it 2
1-4 27 10 , 68
1 -
Z ,1 71
130 `' 29 18 `
j 19 ; 11r 'BO I` . 69
?•`? WETLANDS 70 ,
at
17 I; 'r'-' OPEN SPACE
P.& 04 ft fit
16 1 '
,
15 1
I 10 11 r k0M I? Ps rro. Pa Ito
I 9 r
ly,
7 5 5 I 2 e2 aA X04 Pa 840
I
x-?'-
_•-• b
I ti N 14.46'15"
I W 1' 83
I
L----------
ot4w RD. SEE SHEET
SITE c4mo L=208.17'
? H sR 2t? ?u
' o N 02.06'03"
S.R. 224J 1 18.68'
VICINITY MAP
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
----------------- PROPOSED SUBDIWS/ON
BAY (ISOLATED WETLANDS - NON JURISDIC77ONAL)
This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies as waters
of the U.S. or wetlands all areas of waters of the U.S, including
wetlands, regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
as determined by the undersigned on this date. Unless there is a
change in the low or our published regulations, this determination
of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five yecrs from this date. This determination was made
utilizing the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Name:
Title:
Date:
PB >>O,
PG >>o

I
sR\
00.05'56" W ?'
181.52' J db.
NOTE: TOTAL AREA OF TRACT IS 113.57 ACRES.
WETLAND DELINEA TION
FOR
ROSLIIV F24Ri1S
PROPERTY OF
LANDFALL PARTNERS, LLC
MCLAUCHLIN TWP. HOKE CO., N.C.
SCALE.- 1"= 400' FEBRUARY 2006
-400 -200 0 400 800 1200
CANAD ROAD
SHEET 1 O f 2
?ttN u r rrriEr
z,CN•CA..? - 0,?
10
C. PROFtSSIXt'SOkEYOR NO. L-2763
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27G14 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
To: hlr;- 0,iQ
-? : Cvh?J??ra1?
Yl /Yl IL-
We Transmit to you Herewith:
? Drawings
? Specifications .
? Brochures or photos
Correspondence
L `J As per your request
www.SandEC.com
Transmittal
Project M qOV, Date: _qAla
Project Name: IRndinrn)?
O1D-IkUA
File:
Under Separate Cover:
? For your information and files ? By mail
? For comment or approval ©"' By courier
? Returned.for correction, resubmit ? By express
? Approved as noted
?, I (?/YPn c)1 cc i7/?
?a?/pI?P??ifl? nlr a? of
? r
If enclosures are not as listed as above, kindly notify us at once.
L:J
By. Afi f?,?ulKc? SEP 6 2006
DS ANO WATER
STORkfWATER BRANCH
Charlotte Office-
236 L.ePhillip Court, Suite C Greensboro Office:
Concord, NC 28025 3817-1; Lawndale Drive
Phone: [phone] Greensboro, NC 27455
Fax: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Remarks: ?C: l?lG- l7?c?Q
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
September 5, 2006
S&EC Project # 9881.w1
DWQ Project 806-1102
NCDENR-DWQ
Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Park--view Building
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Response to the NCDWQ's 2nd Request for Additional Information
Roslin Farms
Hoke County
Dear Ms. Karoly:
On July 6, 2006 we submitted a permit application package the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) requesting
written concurrence from the USACE to proceed utilizing Nationwide Permits 14 & 18. With this application, we
copied the NCDWQ with two (2) copies of the application and supplemental information to satisfy the required
notification for utilizing Nationwide Permit (NWP) 18 and Water Quality Certification (WQC) 3402.
On July 25, 2006 we received a request for additional information dated July 19, 2006. This letter specifically
requested a revised Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application, five (5) copies of this revised PCN and the
appropriate fee of $200.00 for the written concurrence to utilized WQC 3404 (NWP 14). No further information
was requested in this letter for the use of WQC 3402 (NWP 18). On August 2, 2006, we responded with a revised
PCN, submitted five (5) copies and the appropriate fee of $200.00.
On August 21, 2006 we received a second request for additional information dated August 15, 2006. In this letter
you have requested that the impact from ditches #1 and #2 be avoided. These impacts are being requested utilizing
WQC 3402 (NWP 18). Because the requested impacts to "Waters of the State" are less than 150 linear feet of
stream and less than 1/3 acres of wetlands (project east of I-95) and an individual certification was not requested by
the NCDWQ, no written concurrence is required from the NCDWQ.
However, you have additionally, requested that the Carolina Bay be shown on the plan sheet. The Carolina Bay is
not going to be impacted and is being preserved as "open space", attached is an overall map indicating the location
of the un-impacted Carolina Bay.
We anticipate that this answers all of the NCDWQ's questions in order to complete the final review process for a
401 Water Quality Certification. Please call or email me at CF/moersnSnndF,C.ennr if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Chris Flowers
Wetland Scientist
Attachments:
• Overall Plan showing Carolina Bay (sheet 1 of 2)
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro,NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
rte' ?1J
?m PB 7,
ti z cn LI V LI O, p

m
QM
a
C:
t? >
O
t
xr r o /
f
AA 000
1 If
r,
, 9. /

N 46.44'16" W
280.00' \ \
56k??pry: s?o. ?0*
49 51 5 • 9d.
OPEN SPACE 48 i 52 ,' ?. ?Q6`• 47
10
46
54
441 45 ,)' .r' 'i ?r• ?C' ,55 ,
42 43 _1' , 61 ' 61 56
-'
63
.' - 38 , 39 40 64 601/59 58 57
37 41 JB PROPOSED 75 ` 74 65 '
35 SUBOM310t( 76
i'
66
--J3--',-- , --T23?31--_ 77 ; 7J
32 24 i 21 -- 67
25` -178 72
26 "1'
27 20 68
IJo l' 2919- -;I - 80 69
Z '
WETLANDS 70 ,
r .. 18
r 1
r• ; 17 I, 'r OPEN SPACE
rn.4 PO. fir
!6 I
- r,
I a 1o 11 ` 15 I
r- k0k ra "01M Ito
12 ` 1 ` ,y1 I
I 9
6 1 5 I. 2 82 AA J004. rCt 140
1 ,
I , ` I \ 1 1
--------.--'.
K,
I y N 14.46115"
N 14.28'13" W I
1 10
------- ---M 7'46 W
EE SHEET 2 o f 2 R=1130.00'
Lr208.17'
F-Z ,wY Ra S
ITE v AIA
1 N 02006'03"
a 118.68'
VICINITY MAP
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
----------------- PROPOSED SUBDIVISION
BAY (ISOLATED WETLANDS - NON JURISDICTIONAL)
This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies as woters
of the U.S. or wetlands all areas of wafers of the U.S, including
wetlands, regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
as determined by the undersigned on this date. Unless there is a
change in the low or our published regulations, this determination
of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years from this date. This determination was made
utilizing the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delinection Manual."
Name:
Title:
Dote:
If
RpS,l?,y
V 0005'S6"AW ROAD sR ??'J
181.52' a'It-IF
NOTE: TOTAL AREA OF TRACT IS 1 13.57 ACRES.
DANAROAD
SHEET 1 o f 2
WETLAND DELINEATION
FOR
ROSLINAF14 Rills
PROPERTY OF
LANDFALL PARTNERS, LLC
McLAUCHLIN TWP. HOKE CO., N.C.
SCALE: 1"= 400' FEBRUARY 2006
-400 -200 0 400 800 1200
71 T., IRIMI
? %A CRRO? °,,m
,. N.....1
'?•??O . •oFp'•••?
...
C.
NO. L-276.
V
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
Transmittal
To: t!G- 01 M)
tG ?7fef7?-
We Transmit to you Herewith:
? Drawings
? Specifications .
? Brochures or photos
L1 Correspondence
As per your request
Project M 9ef)/, 1,)/ Date:
Project Name: -Pod, * Errl1?
C)Lo-1k b2
File:
Under Separate Cover:
? For your information and files ? By-mail
? For comment or approval [ By courier
? Returned.for correction, resubmit ? By express
? Approved as noted
?at?Q?le?ill? N(' a8?01
If enclosures are not as listed as above, kindly notify us at once.
p
Q
By:
?_S E P 6 2006
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORbM'ATER BRANCH
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C Greensboro Office:
Concord, NC 28025 3817-C Lawndale Drive
Phone: [phone] Greensboro, NC 27455
Pax: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Remarks: ??: loll - l'l c )Q
.0
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
L www.SandEC.com -
September 5, 2006
S&EC Project ## 9881.w1
DWQ Project #06-1102
NCDENR-DWQ
Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Parkview Building
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Response to the NCDWQ's 2°d Request for Additional Information
Roslin Farms
Hoke County
Dear Ms. Karoly:
On July 6, 2006 we submitted a permit application package the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) requesting
written concurrence from the USACE to proceed utilizing Nationwide Permits 14 & 18. With this application, we
copied the NCDWQ with two (2) copies of the application and supplemental information to satisfy the required
notification for utilizing Nationwide Permit (NWP) 18 and Water Quality Certification (WQC) 3402.
On July 25, 2006 we received a request for additional information dated July 19, 2006. This letter specifically
requested a revised Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application, five (5) copies of this revised PCN and the
appropriate fee of $200.00 for the written concurrence to utilized WQC 3404 (NWP 14). No further information
was requested in this letter for the use of WQC 3402 (NWP 18). On August 2, 2006, we responded with a revised
PCN, submitted five (5) copies and the appropriate fee of $200.00.
On August 21, 2006 we received a second request for additional information dated August 15, 2006. In this letter
you have requested that the impact from ditches ##1 and #2 be avoided. These impacts are being requested utilizing
WQC 3402 (NWP 18). Because the requested impacts to "Waters of the State" are less than 150 linear feet of
stream and less than 1/3 acres of wetlands (project east of I-95) and an individual certification was not requested by
the NCDWQ, no written concurrence is required from the NCDWQ.
However, you have additionally, requested that the Carolina Bay be shown on the plan sheet. The Carolina Bay is
not going to be impacted and is being preserved as "open space", attached is an overall map indicating the location
of the un-impacted Carolina Bay.
We anticipate that this answers all of the NCDWQ's questions in order to complete the final review process for a
401 Water Quality Certification. Please call or email me at CF1oivers(a).4mrdEC.conr if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Chris Flowers
Wetland Scientist
Attachments:
• Overall Plan showing Carolina Bay (sheet 1 of 2)
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
A
a r?o
P
G >>o
D.G 000, IR 401
I.4 ZA P2 1J
N 46.44'16" W \
280.00' \
s \

76k1.50?'s?•,9?.2',, X16., E 1 ''•;• ?•1p,,9,
49 ' 50
31 ^ • ,9
OPEN SPACE 471 48 ' /32 : ?• ?
53
r' 46 34 )•
?-' 45
43 44 `' '• 3S
62 ' 61
41 i . +.' S6
<' J81 J9 40 63 -' -? 64 ` 60,'39 r 37
37 i 41 ` >'' t' 3d
331` 36 'PROPOS£0'.`,' `, 731'. 74 '65
34 SU801Y131ON 76 , "-- .
77 ; 73
32 24 " 1 11
23 21 178 ' 72 ?. -
311 >' `, 16 - - c (' .
27 20 ', - I , 68
l- >,- - I-, 79 71 '
28 ,
130 1 > 19 , I ? " 80 '. 69
29 WETLANDS r . 1 - J, 70 '
81 1---- -- - -'
?' - 17 OPEN SPAcr
I Q
11 11 " 1s I
•?`?
I 10 r', OF ra no, ra Ito
I 12
9 r
tj \ " I-
r d - -" 14 .h9 I ??
I
I 6 ? 3 2 81 as XC14? ra ao
I y N 14446'15" W 83 e
I
I N 14.28'13" W I
I 109.79' f 01.77'
L--------------- --Af4"' 746" W
,, ,Nzy Ra SEE SHEET 2 of 2 R-1130.00'
S1 TE C4N? L=208.17'
A sq, Po1D
n u # 2?f9 N 02.06'03"
-R. 224J 118.68'
VICINITY MAP
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
----------------- PROPOSED SUBDIVISION
BAY (ISOLATED WETLANDS - NON JURISDICTIONAL)
This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies as waters
of the U.S or wetlands all areas of waters of the U.S, including
wetlcnds, regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
as determined by the undersigned on this date. Unless there is a
change in the law or our published regulations, this determination
of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years from this date. This determination was made
utilizing the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Name:
Title:
Date:
1
/ FR\O'4p
N 00.05'56" W
181.52'
S,p ?1* J
NOTE: TOTAL AREA OF TRACT IS 1 13.57 ACRES.
CANAOY POND ROAD
o S.R, 2249
2
2
0
A
A
o
v ?
?a
?A
cri
SHEET 1 o f 2
WETLAND DELINEATION
FOR
ROSLEY FA.RIVS
PROPERTY OF
LANDFALL PARTNERS, LLC
MCLAUCHLIN TWP. HOKE CO., N.C.
SCALE. I"= 400' FEBRUARY 2006
-400 -200 0 400 800 1200
NO. L-2763
??pi u r rrr?k?
???N CRt<;?'+??
'I6
W a r?9o
?O y
? r
=f
o - -c
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
August 15, 2006
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Ralph Huff
Landfall Partners, LLC
P.O. Box 87555
Fayetteville, NC 28304
Subject Property: Roslin Farms
UT to Cold Camp Creek [030753, 14-22-1-1, C, SW]
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Huff
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ Project # 06-1102
Cumberland County
On July 6, 2006, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated July 7, 2006 to
impact 0.015 acres of wetland and 90 linear feet of perennial stream, to construct the proposed residential
subdivision. On August 2, 2006, the DWQ received additional from you, however, the DWQ has
determined that your application remains incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed
below. The DWQ will require additional information in order to process your application to impact
protected wetlands and/or streams on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive five copies of the
additional information requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as
required by 15A NCAC 2H.0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this
additional information. Please provide the following information so that we may continue to review your
project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Please show the Carolina Bay on the plan sheet.
This Office believes that the ditches labeled on the plans as "Ditch No. 2 and Ditch No. 3" are not
required and impacts to the wetland should be avoided. Please revise the plans to avoid the
impacts.
Please contact the DWQ within three weeks of the date of this letter to verify that you have received this
letter and that you remain interested in continuing to pursue permitting of your project and will be
providing the DWQ the requested information at a later date. Please contact me in writing and Ken
Averitte of the DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office. If we do not hear from you within three weeks, we
will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project as withdrawn.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters
or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not
authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly or Mr. Ian McMillan at 919-733-
1786 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this matter.
N0?e Carolina
terrlJ!!lf
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: h"p•//h2o enr state.nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Landfall Partners, LLC
Page 2 of 2
August 15, 2006
Sincerely,
C
Cyndi Karoly, Supervisor
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBK/ijm
cc: Ken Averitte, DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office
USACE Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Chris Flowers, S&EC, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
Filename: 061102RosiinFarms(Cu mberland)On_Hoid2
DWQ 06102 Roslin Farms
11 1
Subject: DWQ 06-1102 Roslin Farms
From: Laurie Dennison <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:47:35 -0400
To: [e-mail]
Please see attached the Division of Water Quality's request for more information
related to your recent application. Please note that this message is being
forwarded to you electronically so that you may expedite preparation of your
response. Please do not send your response as a reply to this e-mail or via fax.
The hard copy is being sent via US Mail. All response correspondence is to be
mailed via hard copy to the 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit, 2321 Crabtree
Blvd., Raleigh, NC, 27604 unless otherwise noted.
061102RoslinFarms(Cumberland)On_Hold2.doe Content-Type: application/msword
Content-Encoding: base64
1 of 1 8/16/2006 8:48 AM
® Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: (919) 846-_9467
www.SandEC.com j
Transmittal
To: NL- f106? Project #: qSV. W1 Date: '2)/a/06
AfVn: ayrd; Vwol?
21)( Cralkec Oyd. 5i. .25D
2i- a'O , ML 274,04
We Transmit to you Herewith:
? Drawings
? Specifications
? Brochures or photos
Correspondence
As per your request
Project Name: KDS?Ir? ;"roS
0la -1 l 0'C).
File:
? For your information and files
Q? For-c x ent-.or approval
? Returned for correction, resubmit
? Approved as noted
Under Separate Cover:
? By mail
[]' By courier
? By express
No. Conies Document No. Date Description

aVQ -110 " -- fn 'fie uzsl F>rr 6JJ. tlr)&rmY i'Dn
- a o6 tc 2 1$2
QQ

Remarks:
If enclosures are not as listed as above, kindly notify us at once.
By. C' 11?9U1t?ll?(
17
AUG 0 2 2006
: R - WATER C U; ! I TY
r1"ET,? L'C ° J STC:
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
®v Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
. 3 www.SandEC.com
August 2, 2006
S&EC Project # 9881.w1
DWQ Project #06-1102
NCDENR-DWQ
Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Parkview Building
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Response to Request for Additional Information
Roslin Farms
Hoke County
Dear Ms. Karoly:
On July 6, 2006 we submitted a permit application package to you on behalf of Landfall Partners,
LLC. On July 25, 2006 we received a request for additional information dated July 19, 2006. In
response to you request we hereby transmit the additional information to you.
Please call or email me at CFlowersq?SandEC.com if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
744,-
Chris Flowers
Wetland Scientist
Attachments:
• DWQ Application Fee
• 5 copies of original PCN with attaclunents (July 3, 2006)
Charlotte Off-ice: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
F- ?I

-` Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.coni Jul 3 2006
S&EC Project # 9881.w1
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Lillette Granade
69 Darlington Ave
Wilmington, NC 28402
N.C. Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
From: Chris Flowers
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Roslin Farms
Cumberland County, NC
On behalf of the owner, Landfall Partners LLC., please find attached a complete application and
supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) that the activities proposed below may proceed under Nationwide Permits 14 & 18 and
General Water Quality Certifications 3404 & 3402. Please contact me at [phone] if you
have any questions or require additional information. In addition, please consider this application
our request for a no practical alternatives determination. Also, two copies of the PCN form and
supplemental information is being copied to the NC-DWQ to satisfy the required notification for
projects using NWP 18.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name Roslin Farms
Project Type Residential Subdivision
Owner / Applicant Landfall Partners LLC
Count Cumberland
Nearest Town Hope Mills
Water Body Name UT to Cold Cam Creek
Basin / Sub-basin Lumber 03-07-53
Index Number 14-22-1-1
Class C, Sw
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0.008 ac
Wetland Impact acres : 0.015 ac
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.0 ac
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.023 ac
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 90,
Total Impact to Buffers NA
Attachments:
• Pre-construction Notification (PCN)
Application Form
• Agent Authorization
• USGS Map
• Soil Survey Map
• Impact Maps
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
P.- Mul 7In-0anr;
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fav• r336)5a0-8235
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. (O - ? k t7 -,?-
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" oc "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 14 & 18
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystetn Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check( here: ?
II. Applicant Information
v
1. Owner/Applicant Information AUG d 2 2006
Name: Landfall Partners, LLC ATTN: Ralph Huff Ty_
ETLiJ?OS i'Ji0 STCit?,s""`i ?Tu7 C2,',1;CH
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 87555 15 ?tF)
Fayetteville, NC 28304
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Chris Flowers
Company Affiliation:_ Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: CFLOWERSDa SANDEC.COM
Pagel of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Roslin Farms
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0421-09-9279
4. Location
County: Cumberland Nearest Town:_ Hope Mills
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Roslin Farms
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Interstate 95 exit
off at Chicken Foot Rd. and head East. Take the third right onto John McMillian Rd and
then a right onto Roslin Farm Rd., the site is a half of mile on the left.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 34.9024 ON 78.9333 °W
6. Property size (acres): +/- 114
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water:-- Cold Camp Creek
8. River Basin: Lumber River Basin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enE.state.ne.us/admin/inaps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is currently wooded and old agriculture fields. The
pronertwas primarily in sunflower farming The majority of the surrounding propgEly-Js
agricultural with interspersed residential parcels.
Page 2 of 9
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
overall project is the constriction of a residential neighborhood.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The Vurpose of the property is to meet the
p,rowing demand for residential housing in southern Cumberland County.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. No prior permits were obtained for this site or project. S&EC conducted
a jurisdictional wetland delineation on the property in January of 2006. In February 2006 the
USACE confirmed S&EC's wetland delineation and issued a Notice of Jurisdictional
Determination on February 17, 2006 (Action ID# 200600416. An application requesting
JD/Sign-off and the issuance of a NWP 39 to cover impacts resulting from the installation of a
culvert was sent the USACE on March 29, 2006. After reviewing the application it was
determined by Lillette Granade of the USACE that a NWP 14 and 18 will be required not a NWP
39.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permits are anticipated at this time.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 3 of 9
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Three impacts are proposed for
this project. There is a proposed stream crossing which is necessary to access useable upland
area, and two impacts proposed in wetlands resulting from the installation of filter-fabric and
n12-rap.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
NWP 18 / WQC #3402
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog
etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
, es/no linear feet
'Ditch #1 outlet_ Fill (rip-rap/ filter
fabric) Early successional, riparian No 10, 0.0075
Ditch #2 outlet Fill (rip-rap/ filter
fabric) Early successional, riparian No 10, 0.0075
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.015
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: +/- 6 acres (total
includes isolated Carolina Bay)
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
NWP 14 / WQC #3404
Stream Impact
Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on map) Before Impact (linear feet) (acres)
UT to Cold Camp Culvert and 4 Feet
I Creek Stabilization Perennial 90 Feet 0.008
material
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 0.008
Acres
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Page 4 of 9
Open Water Impact Name Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) e) Type of Impact (lake, Pand estuary, sound, bay, Impact
indicate on ma ocean, etc. acres
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Open Water Impact (acres) N/A
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.008
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.015
Open Water Impact (acres): N/A
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.023
Total Stream Impact linear feet): 90,
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ® Yes ? No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
The isolated Carolina Bav will not be impacted and will be nreserved as onen space as well
as for mitigation VuEposes.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The impact to the iurisdictional channel that the annlicant has nronosed is required to access
useable upland area within the subdivision. The two impacts resulting from the installation of
rip-rap and filter fabric are necessary for sediment and erosion control The applicant has
Page 5 of 9
avoided all other jurisdictional areas with respect to their development plan. They have also
proposed to cross the jurisdictional channel at a point where no jurisdictional wetlands occur
adjacent to the channel thereby avoiding and minimizing the impacts to the jurisdictional
wetlands on the property.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnngidc.htm1.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much infonnation as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Because the project is not in a special aquatic site and the impacts to the stream are less
than 150 linear feet and wetland impacts are less than 1/10 acre we believe that no mitigation
should be required for the proposed impacts.
However, if mitigation is required the applicant proposes to preserve the unimpacted
portions of the jurisdictional channel as well as the wetlands adjacent to it. All of the area
outside of the proposed lot lines will be preserved in open space to satisfy county regulations.
Page 6 of 9
The Carolina Bay will also be preserved in open space. The applicant proposes to use the
preservation of the aforementioned areas to mitigate the proposed impacts. A copy of the
preservation agreement between the county and the applicant was previously sent to the
USACE for review. If additional restrictions or guidelines necessary for mitigation are
required they can be added to the existing conservation easement to satisfy mitigation
requirements.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Page 7 of 9
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 N/A 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 N/A 1.5 N/A
Total N/A N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0244, or.0260.
N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss stormwater
controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property. If
percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations demonstrating total proposed
impervious level.- The total proposed impervious surface for the site will be less than 20%.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater will be treated on-site by use of conventional septic systems.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Page 8 of 9
JAN-10-2006 11:55
P.02/03
Soil ,n ?r®nmentag ®atsultants, PA.
1101014vm Ridge izmd Rslag2s, Ncct;t Ctroli9a 2IG14 PticaG (91? 646-5900 raz: (919) ur?-9467
., • wvgr.Ss?C?com
Name:
Phone:
gio - ??
Projoct W=t:/Dcs*tiow 7? 0`,?. IN 1?? S&EC Proj ca # :I P a l • w l
Date: ID .JAN lzoo&
The Iagt of the Army
U.S. A=y Cotpt of Enginects, Wilmkt= District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn:
G,.,1 6 8,- G-,-. r, - A
Field Office: V./,' I 9-:L"
Re: Wdlands ReLited Consulting and Permitting
To Wham It May Concem
1, the current landowocr of taioipai-eftscial, hereby dmignate nad authorize Soil & Pnviraumc W Consultants,
PA to act irx my behalf as my agtmt iuthc proccsaing of permit applications, to upon iogw,ea supplemental
fi&n=don in Support of appliatiotis, tic. froru this day forward. The /Q ..- day of
This notification supersedes any previous eotrespond=e coac=ing the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This sathortzation, for 1 001ty and profetsivaai eourtuy reawas, is vaiid only for Covernmeat oMdAU to
enter the property when accompanied by S&EC SUM You thotdd call 8,&EC to arrange a the meeting prior to
rutting the site.
t/. g- 4LOt}f
Print property Owner's ot?afuat Property rice'scauE?q-Si
cc: Ms. Cyndi 1Caroly ec W. Chris Flowers
NCDENR-DWQ Soil & Envira=aaW Co=gW31s, PA
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
It ei&b, NC 27604
Offim
736 LaPhilGp Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndsle Drive
Coccwd, NC 28025 Crealsboco, NC 27455
Phony (M4)720-040S Phone [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
AGENT AUTHORIZAUON FORM
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h 2o. en r. state. nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: We do
not anticipate this project to act as a catalyst for further development.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
7/j /ot
Applicant/Agent's Signature bate
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Pate 9 of 9
311
• '? ?! ' '/ r/. ? `ice'--/? \\ \\ ?? ?•
?.:
A?-ZI-I..
174
• ? \ , ? , ; . o! , ' ? ? `. - it ? .? d ?'? ?" fem.
f .. t 1
ch,
k v
-__ ..?_?? _i -,. -`? ? {I B)? ? c Vii. r(t?IL:•t :? `. ? ,,;... --'1, r ?Ss._?4 \\
'Fan;
• ?? VSO, '';`?' ?` ?? ` ? \ ?=.. - ?_ '-µ. ? ? ; C?\
'Cem
Project No. Figure I - 1:24K USGS
9881 .W I Topographic Quadrangle
Project Mgr.: Rollin Farms ' Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
CF 0
Jim Kizer 11010 Raven Ridge Rd. - Raleigh, NC 27614
Cumberland Count NC [phone] • [phone]
Scale: Y, Web Page: www.SandMcom
1 2,000'
Hope Mills Quadrangle
10 1 /24/06
APPROX. C/L STREAM -
JURISDICTIONAL CHANNEL
20' DRAINAGE EASM'T? i I RIP-RAP STONE
4 STREAM BA t< I W/ FILTER FABRIC
APRON LENGTH 22E I I I DBL. 36LT.
' HEADWALL
6' D.I.P. INV. OUT 162.00
6' PVC
o - _ i - - M W 80-? ?Q
CD ? IMPACTED ?IR
4' WIDE +
RIP-RAP STONE
1 W/ FILTER FABRIC 0+24 RT.
STREAM BANK 1 DBL. 36' HEADWALL
4' WIDE 11 INV. IN 162.05
A? fl 20' DRAINAGE EASM'T ; I 13
p APPROX. C/L STREAM -
C, IIp JURISDICTIONAL CHANNEL
IMPACTED AREA= 48'x 4' Plus Rip-Rap=360SF.= 0.008 AC.
cD
170
160
2+00 3+00
VICINITY MAP
....Y Ra
r0? Aa
4+00
ENGINEERS V V D
PLANNERS
SURVEYORS
MOORMANXIZER & REITZEL,INC,
115 BROADFOOT AVE. FAYETTEVILLE, N. C_ 28303
PHDNE [phone] FAX [phone]
WATERS OF THE US IMPACTION MAP
ROSLIN FARMS SUBDIVISION
PROPERTY ?F
LANDFALL PARTNERS LLC
Rockfish Twp. Cumberland Co., N.C,
November 2005
RAWN BY DAM DATE 12-20-05
HECKED BY JMK.JR. SCALE 1 "= 40'

Z %?z
SEDIMENT BASIN 91"13"
o\
o?
0
o ?
r
r
r
r
e
r
_ r
_ r
r
r
r
r
r
r
? r
?EDIMENT BASIN" A "
(? ILL BE REMOVED)

VICINITY MAP
-le RD.
PoND Ra
ENGINEERS 9 D
PLANNERS
SURVEYORS
OEIRMAN,KIZER & REITZEL,INC,
115 BROADFOOT AVE. FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. 28305
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
WETLAND IMPACTION MAP FOR DRAINAGE DITCH #1 & #2
ROSLIN FARMS SUBDIVISION
PROPERTY ?F
LANDFALL PARTNERS LLC
Rockfish Twp. Cumberland Co., N.C.
November 2005
RAWN BY DAM DATE 6-14-06
HECKED BY DAM SCALE 1 "= 40'
PPROVED BY A Sheet 1 of 2
RIP-RAP W/
FILTER FABRIC
- ro A
F?
RIP-RAP W/
FILTER FABRIC
n
\ `tiy <
DITCH #1 OUTLET
IMPACTED AREA=Rip-Rap Stone & Filter Fabric=336 SF.= 0.0075 AC.
DITCH #2 OUTLET
IMPACTED AREA=Rip-Rap Stone & Filter Fabric=336 SF.= 0.0075 AC.
"INSERT MAP"
VICINITY MAP
,OKD R.
ENGINEERS o
PLANNERS O
SURVEYORS
M??RMAN,KIZER & REITZEL,INC.
115 BROADFOOT AVE. FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. 28305
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
WETLAND IMPACTION MAP FOR DRAINAGE DITCH #1 & #2
ROSLIN FARMS SUBDIVISION
PROPERTY OF
LANDFALL PARTNERS LLC
Rockfish Twp, Cumberland Co., N.C.
November 2005
;AWN BY DAM DATE 6-14-06
IECKED BY DAM SCALE 1 40'
PROVED BY A Sheet 2 of 2
S. _ F :-A
0 ''F sir
'.
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Lillette Granade
69 Darlington Ave
Wilmington, NC 28402
From: Chris Flowers
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Roslin Farms
Cumberland County, NC
o?0 -1102.
On behalf of the owner, Landfall Partners LLC., please find attached a complete application and
supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) that the activities proposed below may proceed under Nationwide Permits 14 & 18 and
General Water Quality Certifications 3404 & 3402. Please contact me at [phone] if you
have any questions or require additional information. In addition, please consider this application
our request for a no practical alternatives determination. Also, two copies of the PCN form and
supplemental information is being copied to the NC-DWQ to satisfy the required notification for
projects using NWP 18.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name Roslin Farms
Project Type Residential Subdivision
Owner / Applicant Landfall Partners LLC
Count Cumberland
Nearest Town Hope Mills
Water Body Name UT to Cold Cam Creek
Basin / Sub-basin Lumber 03-07-53
Index Number 14-22-1-1
. Class C, SW
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0.008 ac
Wetland Impact acres : 0.015 ac
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.0 ac
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.023 ac
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 90,
Total Impact to Buffers NA
Attachments:
• Pre-construction Notification (PCN) ,
• Application Form
Agent Authorization
L) I,?
• USGS Map a L
• Soil Survey Map AUG 0 2 2006
• Impact Maps
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com July 3, 2006
S&EC Project # 9881.w1
N.C. Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Office Use Only: Fonn Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. OLo - k1 u 2-
(if any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" of "NIA".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 14 & 18
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here:
H. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information AUG 0 :2 2006
Name: Landfall Partners, LLC A71 N: Ralph Huff ? ) ??,:-v, • , -:< c.:_':, I !TY
?ICill-'e U•'t !'J S'.) J I?'? ?,:iVill Lip Gifi ??Ci?i
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 87555
Fayetteville, NC 28304
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Chris Flowers
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants. P.A.
Mailing Address:11010 Raven RidQc Road
Raleiy,h, NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: CFLOWERSPSANDEC.COM
Page 1 of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Roslin Farms
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0421-09-9279
4. Location
County: Cumberland Nearest Town: Hope Mills
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Roslin Farms
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Interstate 95 exit
off at Chicken Foot Rd. and head East. Take the third right onto John McMIllian Rd and
then a right onto Roslin Farm Rd., the site is a half of mile on the left
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 34.9024 ON 78.9333 °W
6. Property size (acres): +/- 114
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Cold Camp Creek
8. River Basin: Lumber River Basin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is currently wooded and old agriculture fields. The
property was primarily in sunflower farming The majority of the surrounding propert?is
agricultural with interspersed residential parcels
Page 2 of 9
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
overall project is the construction of a residential neighborhood.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the property is to meet the
growing demand for residential housing in southern Cumberland County.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. No prior permits were obtained for this site or project. S&EC conducted
a jurisdictional wetland delineation on the property in January of 2006 In February 2006 the
USACE confirmed S&EC's wetland delineation and issued a Notice of Jurisdictional
Determination on February 17, 2006 (Action ID# 200600416 An application requesting
JD/Sign-off and the issuance of a NWP 39 to cover impacts resulting from the installation of a
culvert was sent the USACE on March 29, 2006. After reviewing the application it was
determined by Lillette Granade of the USACE that a NWP 14 and 18 will be required not a NWP
39.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permits are anticipated at this time.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 3 of 9
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Three impacts are proposed for
this project. There is a proposed stream crossing which is necessary to access useable upland
area, and two impacts proposed in wetlands resulting from the installation of filter-fabric and
rip-rap.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
NWP 18 / WQC #3402
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
es/no linear feet
Ditch #1 outlet Fill (rip-rap/ filter
fabric) Early successional, riparian No 10, 0.0075
Ditch #2 outlet Fill (rip-rap/ filter
fabric) Early successional, riparian No 10, 0.0075
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.015
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: +/- 6 acres (total
includes isolated Carolina Bay)
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
NWP 14 / WQC #3404
Stream Impact Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on map) Before Impact (linear feet) (acres)
UT to Cold Camp Culvert and 4 Feet
I Creek Stabilization Perennial 90 Feet 0.008
material
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 0.008
Acres
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Page 4 of 9
Open Water Impact Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number
(if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
indicate on ma ocean, etc. acres
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Open Water Impact (acres) N/A
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact acres): 0.008
Wetland Impact acres : 0.015
Open Water Impact acres): N/A
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. acres 0.023
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 90,
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ® Yes ? No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
The isolated Carolina Bay-will not be impacted and will be nreserved as open snace as well
as for mitigation 12uMoses.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The impact to the iurisdictional channel that the apnlicant has nronosed is reauired to access
useable upland area within the subdivision. The two impacts resulting from the installation of
rip-rap and filter fabric are necessary for sediment and erosion control The applicant has
Page 5 of 9
avoided all other jurisdictional areas with respect to their development plan. They have also
proposed to cross the jurisdictional channel at a point where no jurisdictional wetlands occur
adjacent to the channel thereby avoiding and minimizing the impacts to the jurisdictional
wetlands on the property.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing; losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnnaidc.htm1.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Because the project is not in a special aquatic site and the impacts to the stream are less
than 150 linear feet and wetland impacts are less than 1/10 acre we believe that no mitigation
should be required for the proposed impacts.
However, if mitigation is required the applicant proposes to preserve the unimpacted
portions of the jurisdictional channel as well as the wetlands adjacent to it All of the area
outside of the proposed lot lines will be preserved in open space to satisf county regulations.
Page 6 of 9
The Carolina Bay will also be preserved in open space. The applicant proposes to use the
preservation of the aforementioned areas to mitigate the proposed impacts. A copy of the
preservation agreement between the county and the applicant was previously sent to the
USACE for review. If additional restrictions or guidelines necessary for mitigation are
required they can be added to the existing conservation easement to satisfy mitigation
requirements.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Page 7 of 9
1. Will the project impact
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B
2B .0250 (Randleman
identify
protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
.0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
)? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 N/A 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 N/A 1.5 N/A
Total N/A N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
XI.
XII.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B.0242 or.0244, or.0260.
Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss stormwater
controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property. If
percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations demonstrating total proposed
impervious level. The total proposed impervious surface for the site will be less than 20%.
Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater will be treated on-site by use of conventional septic systems.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact pen-nit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Page 8 of 9
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: We do
not anticipate this project to act as a catalyst for further development.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
JAN-10-2006 11:55
P.02/03
soil & Ln ironmental Consultants, PA
1101014van Ridge Road Raleigi:, Noo Ctmiirsa 27614 • ra= [phone] • Paz: (919) 5464467
Name:
Address:
Alone: cyo -- ! PXo- 4g7
Project Wame/Dc=46ou: 7e O? !N rA6?w1 S&EC Pmj ax # ?f 8_ A / w 1
Date: to ",JAN /ZOO&
Uc DcP==cat of the A=y
U.S. Army Cotps of Engineers, Wilmiogm District
P.O. Bas 1890
Wire NC 26402
Attm L,'It e, Af G-?A
Field Office: w; I ?'??
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
L the currant lattdowtncr c+e oiptsi Tjc zl? hereby dmignate and authorize Soil & Enviroumcntal Consultants,
PA to as in my behalf as my ngcnt iAtht proccuing of permit applications, to Wh upon r pest supplctnc W
infotmstion in support of applicadons, ac. from this day forward. The day of. This notification sup=cdes any pervious eotrespond=e concuniug the agent for this project.

NOTICE: This Authorization, for 110111ty and professional courtesy reasons, [s valid only for goverunuat officials to
eater the property when accompaulod by S&EC staff: You should call SjzEC to arrange a site meeting prior to
vicitine the site.
a.
Print PropCAY Owner's ft-M=fti Property s a € iab'i-Si?stiinrc
cc: Ms. Cyndl Karoly cc: Mr. Chds Flowets
NCDENR - DW Q Soil & Enviro=eatal Consultants, PA
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
ltaloigh, NC 27604
C rlcmofliz 3817-EI.ewndaleDtive
236 4Phillip CauR, Suite C
Conwrd,NC 29025 Crmaibao, NC 274$5
Phony [phone] Phony. (336) 5404234
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
AGENT' AUTHORIZATION FORM
`` ? ,33.1
orlr? ?. 1
as >s 16 ?i , allber?q ?. ay/ ?/ \ \\
Mon
,
?? - I ( ..`sW 'T'r 1.( ?;' y?/? t.?_.,j •"'-s-I 4 `til
l ? of \ 1^ ' ` " ` ' • ? ?,/,t, '"' 2119
I\! V
A( ?.` ••
r y°? + ' era" , /'! y5 \? 1\ 5 a \ w
Project No. FIGJure I - I :24K USGS
9881 .W I Topographic Quadrangle
Protect Mgr.: KoSlln Farms f •
cr p Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Jim Kizer 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
scale: Cumberland County, NC [phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
1" = 2,000'
Hope M1115 Quadrangle
011241OG
f
Project No. Figure 2 - NRCS Soil
988 l .w I
Survey Map
Project Mgr.: ROSIIn Farms Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Chris FLower5
Jim Kizer
a{
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614

scale:
Cumbeland County
NC [phone] - [phone]

' , Web Page: www.SandEC.com
1 2,000 -?
C
l
b
d H
k
C
um
er
an
ounty
o
e
01 124106 Soil Survey
APPROX. C/L STREAM -
JURISDICTIONAL CHANNEL
20' DRAINAGE EASM'T? i 1
STREAM BA?K 1
4 4' WIDE I 1 11 1
I
APRON LENGTH-22'
6' D.I.P.
A' PVC
C-) (
R) O
co
RIP-RAP STONE
W/ FILTER FABRIC
0+24 LT.
DBL. 36' HEADWALL
INV. OUT 162.00
? S
IMPACTED E'A_
4' WIDE

RIP-RAP STONE
1 W/ FILTER FABRIC 0+24 RT.
4 STREAM BA
4' WIDE NK i DBL.
I I INV. 36' HEADWALL
IN 162.05
A? 20' DRAINAGE EASM'T 13
,l APPROX. C/L STREAM -
11
O JURISDICTIONAL CHANNEL
IMPACTED AREA= 48'x 4' Plus Rip-Rap=360S F.= 0.008 AC.
M
t\
cD
170
160
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
-.v 0.
rt"y R4
4+00
ENGINEERS D
PLANNERS
SURVEYORS
MOORMAN,KIZER & REITZEL,INC.
113 BROADFOOT AVE. FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. 28303
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
WATERS?F THE US IMPACTION MAP
ROSLIN FARMS SUBDIVISION
PROPERTY ?F
LANDFALL PARTNERS LLC
Rockfish Twp, CumberLQnci Co„ N,C.
November 2005
;AWN BY DAM DATE 12-20-05
IECKED BY JMK JR. SCALE 1 "= 40'
PROVED BY A of
2+00 3+00
U- U e- u
//
SEDIMENT BASIN "5"
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
?EDIMENT BASIN" A "
(PILL BE REMOVED)
mac-' ?
VICINITY MAP
-4 F.D.
?Y PAD Ra
22?_
ENGINEERS ° D
PLANNERS
SURVEYORS
M??RMAN,KIZER & REITZEL,INC.
115 DROADFCOT AVE. FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. 28305
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
WETLAND IMPACTION MAP FOR DRAINAGE DITCH #1 & #2
ROSLIN FARMS SUBDIVISION
PROPERTY ?F
LANDFALL PARTNERS LLC
Rockfish Twp. Cumberland Co., N.C.
DRAWN BY DAM DATE 6-14-06
CHECKED BY DAM SCALE 1 "= 40'
1
RIP-RAP W/
FILTER FABRIC
??TRFADk C .
F?
DITCH #1 OUTLET
IMPACTED AREA=Rip-Rap Stone & Filter Fabric=336 SF.= 0.0075 AC.
RIP-RAP W/
FILTER FABRIC
i

DITCH #2 OUTLET
IMPACTED AREA=Rip-Rap Stone & Filter Fabric=336 SF.= 0.0075 AC.
"INSERT MAP//
DI D
VwZER Cw i, RD ENGINEERS
PLANNERS O
SURVEYORS
MDORMAN,KIZER & REITZEL,INC,
115 BROADFOOT AVE. FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. 28305
D? Qa PHONE [phone] FAX [phone].
sv+ c??+r WETLAND IMPACTION MAP FOR DRAINAGE DITCH #1 & #2
ryr SITE ROSLIN FARMS SUBDIVISION
lp? f PIINy RD•
9f?9 Svt, 22.0 PROPERTY ?F
s LANDFALL PARTNERS LLC
ROSLIN FARM RD. S.R. 2243 Rockfish Twp. Cumberland Co., N.C.
November 2005
A DRAWN BY DAM DATE 6-14-06
VICINITY MAP CHECKED BY DAM SCALE 1 "= 40'
APPROVED BY A Sheet 2 of 2

A r

r_
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.coni July 3, 2006
S&EC Project # 9881.w1
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Lillette Granade
69 Darlington Ave
Wilmington, NC 28402
From: Chris Flowers
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Roslin Farms
Cumberland County, NC
N.C. Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260

On behalf of the owner, Landfall Partners LLC., please find attached a complete application and
supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) that the activities proposed below may proceed under Nationwide Permits 14 & 18 and
General Water Quality Certifications 3404 & 3402. Please contact me at [phone] if you
have any questions or require additional information. In addition, please consider this application
our request for a no practical alternatives determination. Also, two copies of the PCN form and
supplemental information is being copied to the NC-DWQ to satisfy the required notification for
projects using NWP 18.
PRO]FrT SI 1MMARY
Project Name Roslin Farms
Project Type Residential Subdivision
Owner / Applicant Landfall Partners LLC
Count Cumberland
Nearest Town Hope Mills
Water Body Name UT to Cold Cam Creek
Basin / Sub-basin Lumber 03-07-53
Index Number 14-22-1-1
Class C, SW
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0.008 ac
Wetland Impact acres : 0.015 ac
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.0 ac
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.023 ac
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 90'
Total Impact to Buffers NA
Attachments:
• Pre-construction Notification (PCN)
Application Form
• Agent Authorization ?? -
• USGS Map • Soil Survey Map
• Impact Maps ?
AUG 0 2 2006
r}c.
Charlotte Office: 1rE1Uu<'US?I
?1C" ?r,T'3Er? T;Cii Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
P-- (70s) TM-040r, Fly- (ii(i) 5,in_9735
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. O to - \ \ O _,?-
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 14 & I
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information j^ j ???? ?!?)? ?;
11U t=. U
1. Owner/Applicant Infonnation AUG 0 2, 2006
Name: Landfall Partners, LLC ATTN: Ralph Huff
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 87555
Fayetteville, NC 28304
Telephone Number:_ [phone] Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Chris Flowers
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Ralei_h, NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: CFLOWERS a,SANDEC.COM
Page I of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Roslin Farms
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0421-09-9279
4. Location
County: Cumberland Nearest Town: Hope Mills
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Roslin Farms
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Interstate 95 exit
off at Chicken Foot Rd. and head East. Take the third right onto John McMlllian Rd. and
then a right onto Roslin Farm Rd., the site is a half of mile on the left.
Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 34.9024 ON 78.9333 °W
6. Property size (acres): +/- 114
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water:- Cold Camp Creek
8. River Basin: Lumber River Basin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.tic.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is currently wooded and old agriculture fields. The
property was primarily in sunflower fanning. The majority of the surrounding propert is
a,gricultural with interspersed residential parcels.
Page 2 of 9
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
overall project is the construction of a residential neighborhood.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the property is to meet the
growing demand for residential housing in southern Cumberland County.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional detenninations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. No prior pen-nits were obtained for this site or project. S&EC conducted
a jurisdictional wetland delineation on the property in January of 2006. In February 2006 the
USACE confirmed S&EC's wetland delineation and issued a Notice of Jurisdictional
Determination on February 17, 2006 (Action ID# 200600416). An application requesting
JD/Sign-off and the issuance of a NWP 39 to cover impacts resulting from the installation of a
culvert was sent the USACE on March 29, 2006. After reviewing the application it was
determined by Lillette Granade of the USACE that a NWP 14 and 18 will be required not a NWP
39.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future pennits are anticipated at this time.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to detennine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 3 of 9
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Three impacts are proposed for
this project. There is a proposed stream crossing which is necessary to access useable upland
area, and two impacts proposed in wetlands resulting from the installation of filter-fabric and
rip-rap.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
NWP 18 / WOC #3402
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
es/no linear feet
Ditch #1 outlet Fill (rip-rap/ filter Early successional, riparian No 10, 0.0075
fabric)
Ditch #2 outlet Fill (rip-rap/ filter
fabric) Early successional, riparian No 10, 0.0075
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.015
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: +/- 6 acres (total
includes isolated Carolina Bay)
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
NWP 14 / WOC #3404
Stream Impact
Number

(indicate on map)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average

Stream Width
Before Impact Impact

Length

(linear feet) Area of

Impact

(acres)
UT to Cold Camp Culvert and 4 Feet
I Creek Stabilization Perennial 90 Feet 0.008
material
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 0.008
Acres
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Page 4 of 9
Open Water Impact Name
waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake. Pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
indicate on ma ocean, etc. acres
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Open Water Impact (acres) N/A
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.008
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.015
Open Water Impact (acres): N/A
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.023
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 90,
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ® Yes ? No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
The isolated Carolina Bav will not be impacted and will be preserved as onen space as well
as for mitigation Vu!poses.
Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The impact to the iurisdictional channel that the annlicant has nronosed is required to access
useable upland area within the subdivision. The two impacts resulting from the installation of
rip-rap and filter fabric are necessary for sediment and erosion control. The applicant has
Page 5 of 9
avoided all other jurisdictional areas with respect to their development plan. They have also
proposed to cross the jurisdictional channel at a point where no jurisdictional wetlands occur
adjacent to the channel thereby avoiding and minimizing the impacts to the jurisdictional
wetlands on the property.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in D`VQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/stnngide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Because the project is not in a special aquatic site and the impacts to the stream are less
than 150 linear feet and wetland impacts are less than l/10 acre we believe that no mitigation
should be required for the proposed impacts.
However, if mitigation is required the applicant proposes to preserve the unimpacted
portions of the jurisdictional channel as well as the wetlands adjacent to it. All of the area
outside of the proposed lot lines will be preserved in open space to satisfy county regulations.
Page 6 of 9
The Carolina Bay will also be preserved in open space. The applicant proposes to use the
preservation of the aforementioned areas to mitigate the proposed impacts. A copy of the
preservation agreement between the county and the applicant was previously sent to the
USACE for review. If additional restrictions or guidelines necessary for mitigation are
required they can be added to the existing conservation easement to satisfy n,iti afi tion
requirements.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wM/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Page 7 of 9
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 213.0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 0213.0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify, )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 N/A 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 N/A 1.5 N/A
Total N/A N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 213.0242 or.0244, or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss stormwater
controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property. If
percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations demonstrating total proposed
impervious level. The total proposed impervious surface for the site will be less than 20%.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater will be treated on-site by use of conventional septic systems.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact pennit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DN11Q)
Page 8 of 9
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr. state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: We do
not anticipate this project to act as a catalyst for further development.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
7 j ?ot
Applicant/Agcnt's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
JAN-10-2036 11:55
Name:
Phone:
onmental
P.02/03
Consultants, PA
I= (919) M6-5900 - Fu: [phone]

Projcct W==M=* on: ?Ozo?/N S&EC Proj ect # Q a
Datc: /D JAN /zw&
n%c Dep r%t cf the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, WUmixl District
P.O. Box 1890
Vrilmiagtaa, NC 28442
Arta:
G,-f 1 eA-
Re: Wetlands Related Comsulting and Permitting
To Whom It may Concern:
I, the eurrcat Landowner a oiptd-efl3tK hereby a=pate and authorize SOU h Mviro==tal COASWW&-
PA to act in my behalf as my agent iatht Pme'dug of pcrM1t applications, to Wh upon Tcx?ucst supplemental
fi&n=don in supportof appliaatiotu, etc. from this day forward. The day of A14 X11 417 .
This notification supmedes any pm -sous eow:gvndatcc couceming the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This A91thorIZZ60n, for 1l&bWty And profrMoaal courteq reaeous, Es vaUd oWy for Covernmant 0MCIab to
eater the property when accompatdod by S&EC stsf - You should cart 6&EC to arranCe a Site meeting prior to
vW inc the Sue.
0. 0/' ?'
Print Property Owner's or itipol A? Propedy ?6
cc: M8. Cyndi Kuoly co: Mr. Chris Flowers
NMENR _ DWQ Soil & Enviromnental CoosiAw ts, PA
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Maieb, NC 27604
236 IzPhillip Caur% Suitt C 3817-E Lmvndalc DtiYc
Concord, NC 28025 ca-cm,boco. NC 27455
Phony [phone] Phone [phone]
Pax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
AGENT.AUTHORIZA17ION FORM
? •''3,'11 • I `i1i % \` ;* J \? ? \\? ?? / ?\\
rs •6 \atllierri l., ay,
'V N
174
.,;? 1 •\ \`4 .? Way, ? ?? ? a 1? j• ?? sg
? T`??; „? 1 ?. i ? `: \? C) ? - t ?/'??.-y -?, ? ,_( a •? V)
J 1 ?_? r
:Cam
Project No. FlcJure I - 1:24K USGS
955IM I Topographic Quadrangle
Project Mgr.: Rosim Farms Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
CF _
Jim Kizer ?*,? 11010 Raven Ridge Rd. Raleigh, NC 27614
scale: Cumberland County, NC ?' [phone] -[phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
1' = 2,000'
Hope W15 Quadrangle
O 1 /24/06
Cumberland ? Hoke County
O I /24/06 Soil Survey
APPROX. C/L STREAM -
JURISDICTIONAL CHANNEL
20' DRAINAGE EASM'T? i 1
I
4 STREAM BA ti
4' WIDE I I 1
APRON LENGTH-22' I I
6' D.I.P.

O
O
o ---4 W
RIP-RAP STONE
W/ FILTER FABRIC
0+24 LT.
DBL. 36' HEADWALL
INV. OUT 162.00
?
,
IMPACTED-MU 4' WIDE
co a
RIP-RAP STONE 1
14 W/ FILTER FABRIC + 0+24 RT.
STREAM BANK DBL. 36' HEADWALL
4' WIDE 11 INV. IN 162.05
A8 f 20' DRAINAGE EASM'T ; I 13
I? APPROX. C/L STREAM -
110 JURISDICTIONAL CHANNEL
IMPACTED AREA=-48'x 4' Plus Rip-Rap= 3 60 SF.= 0 . 0 0 8 AC.
r\
r`
cD
170
160
VICINITY MAP
N.T.C.
.-If RA
raRD RD.
4+00
ENGINEERS D
PLANNERS D
SURVEYORS
MOORMAN,KIZER & REITZEL,INC,
115 BROADFOOT AVE FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. 28303
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
WATERS ?F THE US IMPACTION MAP
ROSLIN FARMS SUBDIVISION
PROPERTY ?F
LANDFALL PARTNERS LLC
Rockfish Twp. Cumberland Co., N.C,
November 2005
RAWN BY DAM DATE 12-20-05
11
NECKED BY JMK.JR. SCALE 1
40'
2+00 3+00
SEDIMENT BASIN "B"
r
r
r
e
t
_ r
_ r
r
r
r
r
e
r
SEDIMENT BASIN" A "
(PILL BE REMOVED)
VICINITY MAP
)Y PAD RA
224^_
ENGINEERS o D
PLANNERS 0
SURVEYORS
MOORMAN,KIZER & REITZEL,INC,
115 BROADFOOT AVE. FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. 28305
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
WETLAND IMPACTION MAP FOR DRAINAGE DITCH #1 & #2
ROSLIN FARMS SUBDIVISION
PROPERTY OF
LANDFALL PARTNERS LLC
Rockfish Twp. Cumberland Co., N.C.
November 2005
DRAWN BY DAM DATE 6-14-06
CHECKED BY DAM SCALE 1 lp= 40'
? RIP-RAP W/
FILTER FABRIC

B ITCH #1 OU TLET
IMPACTED AREA=Rip-Rap Stone & Filter Fabric=336 SF.= 0.0075 AC.
RIP-RAP W/
FILTER FABRIC
n
DITCH #2 ?UTLET
IMPACTED AREA=Rip-Rap Stone & Filter Fabric=336 SF.= 0.0075 AC.
"INSERT MAP//
v
0.
G?'DY A?
SIM
SITE
?+D An
sspy(
w 2249
RDSLIN FARM RD. S.R. 2p43
VICINITY MAP
AITf`
ENGINEERS ° D
PLANNERS O
SURVEYORS
M??RMAN,KIZER & REITZEL,INC.
115 BROADFOOT AVE. FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. 28305
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
WETLAND IMPACTION MAP FOR DRAINAGE DITCH #1;& #2
ROSLIN FARMS SUBDIVISIOf
PROPERTY OF
LANDFALL PARTNERS LLC
Rockfish Twp. Cumberland Co., N.C
DRAWN BY DAM DATE 6-14-06
CHECKED BY DAM SCALE 1 "= 40t
ADDDnWCn By A Sheet 2 of-2
40F WATF9Q Michael F. Easley, Governor
`O G William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
5w - -1
.? Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 19, 2006
DWQ Project # 06-1102
Cumberland County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Ralph Huff
Landfall Partners, LLC
P.O. Box 87555
Fayetteville, NC 28304
Subject Property: Roslin Farms
UT to Cold Camp Creek [030753, 14-22-1-1, C, SW]
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Huff:
On July 6, 2006, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated July 7, 2006 to
impact 0.015 acres of wetland and 90 linear feet of perennial stream, to construct the proposed residential
subdivision. The DWQ has determined that your application was incomplete and/or provided inaccurate
information as discussed below. The DWQ will require additional information in order to process your
application to impact protected wetlands and/or streams on the subject property. Therefore, unless we
receive the additional information requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your
application as required by 15A NCAC 2H.0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we
receive this additional information. Please provide the following information so that we may continue to
review your project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. You have indicated that the road crossing will be permitted under a Nationwide Permit 14, which
is General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3404 (GC3404). According to Item No. 2 in
the GC3404, "Proposed fill or substantial modification of wetlands or waters (including streams)
under this General Certification requires application to and prior written concurrence from the
Division of Water Quality". Therefore, please revise your Pre-Construction Notification
application and resubmit five (5) copies of the PCN application and the appropriate fee of
$200.00 to the DWQ.
Please contact the DWQ within three weeks of the date of this letter to verify that you have received this
letter and that you remain interested in,continuing to pursue permitting of your project and will be
providing the DWQ the requested information at a later date. Please contact me in writing and Ken
Averitte of the DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office. If we do not hear from you within three weeks, we
will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project as withdrawn.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters
or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not
None Carolina
fllrll!!!f
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.stnte nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Landfall Partners, LLC f
Page 2 of 2
August 15, 2006
Sincerely,
Cyndi Karoly, Supervisor
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBK/ijm
cc: Ken Averitte, DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office
USACE Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Chris Flowers, S&EC, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
Filename: 061102RosliuFarms(Cu mberland)Ou_Hold2
D;VQ 06t 102 Roslin Farms
Subject: DWQ 06-1102 Roslin Farms
From: Laurie Dennison <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 08:02:14 -0400
To: [e-mail]
Please see attached the Division of Water Quality's request for more information
related to your recent application. Please note that this message is being
forwarded to you electronically so that you may expedite preparation of your
response. Please do not send your response as a reply to this e-mail or via fax.
The hard copy is being sent via US Mail. All response correspondence is to be
mailed via hard copy to the 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit, 2321 Crabtree
Blvd., Raleigh, NC, 27604 unless otherwise noted.
061102RoslinFarms(Cumberland)On_Hold.doe
Content-Type: application/msword
Content-Encoding: base64
1 of 1
7/20/2006 8:02 AM
2 0 0 6 1 1 0 2
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
To: ?I?JQ
We Transmit to you Herewith:
? Drawings
? Specifications
? Brochures or photos
? Correspondence
? As per your request
Transmittal
Project #: Date: 7?'cj Q
Project Name: y
Faso ? , ? ? ??
File:
? For your information and files
? For comment or approval
? Returned for correction, resubmit
? Approved as noted
LT?d.e?Senat•a •Shcver:
ier
T2v Axnrss
No. Copies Document No. Date Description
u?
Remarks:
If enclosures are not as listed as above, kindly notify us at once.
F24-7
D
JUL 0 6 2006
By. ?? >??? 12 U DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS.AND STORMWATEER BRANCH
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone:, [phone]
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Lillette Granade
69 Darlington Ave
Wilmington, NC 28402
www.SandEC.com July 3, 2006
S&EC Project # 9881.w1
N.C. Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
From: Chris Flowers
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Roslin Farms
Cumberland County, NC
On behalf of the owner, Landfall Partners LLC., please find attached a complete application and
supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) that the activities proposed below may proceed under Nationwide Permits 14 & 18 and
General Water Quality Certifications 3404 & 3402. Please contact me at [phone] if you
have any questions or.require additional information. In addition, please consider this application
our request for a no practical alternatives determination. Also, two copies of the PCN form and
supplemental information is being copied to the NC-DWQ to satisfy the required notification for
projects using NWP 18.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name Roslin Farms
Project Type Residential Subdivision
Owner / Applicant Landfall Partners LLC
Count Cumberland
Nearest Town Hope Mills
Water Body Name UT to Cold Cam Creek
Basin / Sub-basin Lumber 03-07-53
Index Number 14-22-1-1
Class C, SW
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0.008 ac
Wetland Impact acres : 0.015 ac
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.0 ac
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.023 ac
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 90,
Total Impact to Buffers NA
Attachments:
• Pre-construction Notification (PCN)
Application Form
• Agent Authorization
• USGS Map
• Soil Survey Map
• Impact Maps
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LcPhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Office Use Only: Fonn Version March 05
2 0 0 G 1 1 0 2
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" oc "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:,
® Section 404 Pen-nit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 14 & 18
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
H. Applicant Information k C9
1. Owner/Applicant Information JUL 0 6 2006
Name: Landfall Partners, LLC ATTN: Ralph Huff nFNR. WATER QUALITY
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 87555 WETUMSA140STORlkNATERBRANCH
Fayetteville, NC 28304
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Infonnation (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Chris Flowers
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing; the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing; property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding; properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Roslin Farms
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0421
4. Location
County: Cumberland Nearest Town: Hope Mills
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Roslin Farms
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Interstate 95 exit
off at Chicken Foot Rd. and head East. Take the third right onto John McMillian Rd. and
then a right onto Roslin Farm Rd., the site is a half of mile on the left.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 34.9024 ON 78.9333 °W
6. Property size (acres): +/- 114
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Cold Camp Creek
8. River Basin: Lumber River Basin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is currently wooded and old agriculture fields. The
property was primarily in sunflower fanning. The majority of the surrounding property
with interspersed residential parcels.
Page 2 of 9
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
overall project is the construction of a residential neighborhood.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the property is to meet the
growing demand for residential housing in southern Cumberland County.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional detenninations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. No prior permits were obtained for this site or project. S&EC conducted
a jurisdictional wetland delineation on the property in January of 2006. In February 2006 the
USACE confirmed S&EC's wetland delineation and issued a Notice of Jurisdictional
Determination on February 17, 2006 (Action ID# 200600416). An application requesting
JD/Sign-off and the issuance of a NWP 39 to cover impacts resulting from the installation of a
culvert was sent the USACE on March 29, 2006. After reviewing the application it was
determined by Lillette Granade of the USACE that a NWP 14 and 18 will be required not a NWP
39.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permits are anticipated at this time.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 3 of 9
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Three impacts are proposed for
this project. There is a proposed stream crossing which is necessary to access useable upland
area, and two impacts proposed in wetlands resulting from the installation of filter-fabric and
rin-ran.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
NWP 18 / W QC #3402
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
es/no linear feet
Ditch #1 outlet Fill (rip-rap/ filter
fabric) Early successional, riparian No 10, 0.0075
Ditch #2 outlet Fill (rip-rap/ filter
fabric) Early successional, riparian No 10, 0.0075
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.015
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: +/- 6 acres (total
includes isolated Carolina Bay)
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
NWP 14 / WQC #3404
Stream Impact
Perennial Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact Intermittent? t? Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on map) Before Impact (linear feet) (acres)
UT to Cold Camp Culvert and 4 Feet
I Creek Stabilization Perennial 90 Feet 0.008
material
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 0.008
Acres
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Page 4 of 9
Open Water Impact Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
indicate on ma ocean, etc. acres
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Open Water Impact (acres) N/A
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.008
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.015
Open Water Impact (acres): N/A
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.023
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 90,
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ® Yes ? No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USAGE.
The isolated Carolina Bav will not be imnacted and will be nreserved as oven space as well
as for mitigation purposes.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The impact to the iurisdictional channel that the apmlicant has nronosed is reouired to access
useable upland area within the subdivision. The two impacts resulting from the installation of
rip-rap and filter fabric are necessary for sediment and erosion control. The applicant has
Page 5 of 9
avoided all other jurisdictional areas with respect to their development plan. They have also
proposed to cross the jurisdictional channel at a point where no jurisdictional wetlands occur
adjacent to the channel thereby avoiding and minimizing the impacts to the jurisdictional
wetlands on the property.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/stnngide.htni1.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Because the project is not in a special aquatic site and the impacts to the stream are less
than 150 linear feet and wetland impacts are less than 1/10 acre we believe that no mitigation
should be required for the proposed impacts.
However, if mitigation is required the applicant proposes to preserve the unimpacted
portions of the jurisdictional channel as well as the wetlands adjacent to it. All of the area
outside of the proposed lot lines will be preserved in open space to satisfy county regulations.
Page 6 of 9
The Carolina Bay will also be preserved in open space. The applicant proposes to use the
preservation of the aforementioned areas to mitigate the proposed impacts. A copy of the
preservation agreement between the county and the applicant was previously sent to the
USACE for review. If additional restrictions or guidelines necessary for mitigation are
required they can be added to the existing conservation easement to satisfy mitigation
requirements.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wM/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Page 7 of 9
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 N/A 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 N/A 1.5 N/A
Total N/A N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 213.0242 or.0244, or.0260.
N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss stormwater
controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property. If
percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations demonstrating total proposed
impervious level. The total proposed impervious surface for the site will be less than 20%.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater will be treated on-site by use of conventional septic systems.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Page 8 of 9
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://112o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: We do
not anticipate this project to act as a catalyst for further development.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
NA
717-,10.4
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
JAN-10-2006 11:55 P.02i03
soil & En ironmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rc.d • Ralcig,R, Ncnh CUOU04 27614 • Pbc= [phone] • E= [phone]
• rrww scadEcl"m
AGENTAUMORIZ.A110N FORM
Name: 1_??dh/?D ,?G ? ?146_4?? ?/' :o
Ad&css: P?o fox 017555
.. 50d67761,11,
rhotle: C ?/o -- i PX _ 4g764
Project W=um Dcsc ip6ott: 2'G ot!X?IN r4ao S&EC Project # S A l w l
Date: to .JAN 2OO&
Thu Deporaeat of the Army
U.S. Army Co" of Engia=s, Witmcogmn Dion id
P.O. Sax 1890
QrJmftW,Wa, NC 26402
Attu: G,w e Ne,
rield Officc: __V'/"1n1; Qdc11
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting znd Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
1. the cmrcat 41ndowtur o oip?i-effsci?, hereby d=ipate and authorize Soil & Etlviroumcntal Consultants,
PA to act in my bobalf as my agent iuthe Processing of permit npplica&ns,? t?o h upon vest supplemental
infon=don in support of appliatkw, dc. from this day forward. The -day of An/ ;'ZW& .
This notification supersedes any prt:vious co=pond=,: concerning the agent for this projcct.
NOTICE: This authorizatiou, for 11001ty and profrMostal courtesy rcasaas, to valid easy for Eoveri u?Lt oft3el411 to
eater the property when accompanied by S&EC staff- Yea shotdd call S&EC to arrauyc a site sheeting prior to
vicitine the
site.
o. Ak- -A
Print Property Owner's ezafuai Property 01=1
cc: Ma. Cyndi Karoly ec: W. Ctuis Flowers
NCDFNR - DWQ Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Mci&h, NC 27604
Chqflo= S-9tort?(1 cC
236 LcPhillip Cour% Suite C 3817-E Lawndalc Drive
Coawcd, NC 28025 C C'Msboco, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone [phone]
Pax: [phone] Fex: [phone]
/ i
t •'311
Ch C • 4 'N` ?allfierr/Y
?•?
V. V
`??•` _
?f
jai' ???`? t ?,,. ,???
\ ,
/ Al
.?- `^``` ? ? \ ??y ? - ? ?y /?1? ? ;? it
i -t?C ? t l //1
-1-1 7
- JN?\
t ?.
l.lA ' _ trot t
1 •-0:_ 1? ` 0 1
Project No. Figure I - 1:24K USGS
9881 .W 1 Topographic Quadrangle
Project Mgr.: Roslin Farms Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
CF Jim Kizer 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
Scale: Cumberland County, NC [phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
1"= 2,000'
Hope MiII5 Quadrangle
0 1 /24/06
APPROX. C/L STREAM -
JURISDICTIONAL CHANNEL
20' DRAINAGE EASM'T
4 STREAM BA K I
4' WIDE I
APRON LENGTH-22'
6' D.I.P.

ru c:)
f
0
co
v
RIP-RAP STONE
W/ FILTER FABRIC
0+214 LT.
DBL. 36' HEADWALL
INV. OUT 162.00
\?
ij?
IMPACTED---ARF-4
4' WIDE +
1 ?
RIP-RAP STONE
W/ FILTER FABRIC 1 0+24 RT.
1
4
STREAM BA
'
NK I DBL.
INV
36' HEADWALL
05
IN 162
WIDE
4 .
%I .
A8 20' DRAINAGE EASM'T I 13
I
ID
AC APPROX. C/L STREAM -
l
z o JURISDICTIONAL CHANNEL
IMPACTED AREA= 48'x 4' Plus Rip-Rap= 3 60 S F.= 0 . 0 0 8 AC.
M
t`
t\
cD
170
160
2+00 3+00 4+00
o D
jVj V
VWtER C04A? AD ENGINEERS
PLANNERS
SURVEYORS
M1313RMAN,KIZER & REITZEL,INC,
S 113 BROADFOOT AVE. FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. 28303
10). PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
i1" cN+?? WATERS OF THE US IMPACTION MAP
fyr SITE
54 ROSLI N FARMS SUBDIVISION
Sx. ZZ,e LANDFALLPROPERTY TNERS LLC
9J -- y
s
ROSLIN FARM RD. S.R, 2243 Rockfish TWp. Cumberland Co., N.C.
November 2005
P DRAWN BY DAM DATE 12-20-05
VICINITY MAP ' p CHECKED BY JMK JR. SCALE 1 "= 40'
N.T.S. APPROVED BY A of

SEDIMENT BASIN "B"
e
e
e
e
e
e
_ r
_ r
e
l
r
e
e
l
1
I
: EDIMENT BASIN" A "
(/ILL BE REMOVED)
r ?
VwtER 2?µpDY RD' ENGINEERS o D
PLANNERS
? SURVEYORS ?
MO13RMAN,KIZER & REITZEL,INC,
' 115 BROADFOOT AVE. FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. 28305
DY QD PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
stx?" WETLAND IMPACTION MAP FOR DRAINAGE DITCH #1 & #2
rti? SITE
? DY POND RD.
.Pp ROSLIN FARMS SUBDIVISION
sx 2249 PROPERTY ?F
9s f LANDFALL PARTNERS LLC
ROSLIN FARM RD. S.R• 2243 yA Rockfish TWp. Cumberland Co., N.C.
November 2005
DRAWN BY DAM DATE 6-14-06
VICINITY MAP CHECKED BY DAM SCALE 1 "= 40'
N,T APPROVED BY A Sheet 1 of 2
? RIP-RAP W/
j I FILTER FABRIC
A Ci
DITCH #1 ?UTLET
IMPACTED AREA=Rip-Rap Stone & Filter Fabric=336 SF.= 0.0075 AC.
RIP-RAP W/
FILTER FABRIC

DITCH #2 ?UTLET
IMPACTED AREA=Rip-Rap Stone & Filter Fabric=336 SF.= 0.0075 AC.
"INSERT MAP//
VICINITY MAP
POKD RD.
ENGINEERS o
PLANNERS
SURVEYORS
MOORMAN,KIZER & REITZEL,INC,
115 BROADFOOT AVE. FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. 20305
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
WETLAND IMPACTION MAP FOR DRAINAGE DITCH 41 & #2
ROSLIN FARMS SUBDIVISION
PROPERTY OF
LANDFALL PARTNERS LLC
Rockfish Twp, Cumberland Co„ NZ,
November 2005
DRAWN BY DAM DATE 6-14-06
CHECKED BY DAM SCALE 1 "= 40'
APPROVED BY A Sheet 2 of 2
2 0 0 6 1 1 0 2
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.cotn
Transmittal
To: J?Q

We Transmit to you Herewith:
? Drawings
? Specifications
? Brochures or photos
? Correspondence
? As per your request
Project #: !21-7Q 1,
Date: 71yj d
Project Name:
1i-C
?(Ony File:
s4y
? b?61 Ilrt; . _
? For your information and files
? For comment or approval
? Returned for correction, resubmit
? Approved as noted
er:
D--By-mail
ier
---=mss
No. Copies I Document No. I Date Description
Remarks:
If enclosures are not as listed as above, kindly notify us at once, U (2 `?
l? ?U
By: C J1 U JUL 0 6 2006
DENR -WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS ",ND STOFNWATER BRANCH
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Plione:: [phone]
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Lillette Granade
69 Darlington Ave
Wilmington, NC 28402
www.SandEC.com July 3, 2006
S&EC Project # 9881.w1
N.C. Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
From: Chris Flowers
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Roslin Farms
Cumberland County, NC
On behalf of the owner, Landfall Partners LLC., please find attached a complete application and
supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) that the activities proposed below may proceed under Nationwide Permits 14 & 18 and
General Water Quality Certifications 3404 & 3402. Please contact me at [phone] if you
have any questions or require additional information. In addition, please consider this application
our request for a no practical alternatives determination. Also, two copies of the PCN form and
supplemental information is being copied to the NC-DWQ to satisfy the required notification for
projects using NWP 18.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name Roslin Farms
Project Type Residential Subdivision
Owner / Applicant Landfall Partners LLC
Count Cumberland
Nearest Town Hope Mills
Water Body Name UT to Cold Cam Creek
Basin / Sub-basin Lumber 03-07-53
Index Number 14-22-1-1
Class C, Sw
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0.008 ac
Wetland Impact acres : 0.015 ac
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.0 ac
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.023 ac
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 90,
Total Impact to Buffers NA
Attachments:
• Pre-construction Notification (PCN)
Application Form
• Agent Authorization
• USGS Map
• Soil Survey Map
• Impact Maps
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Office Use Only: Fonn Version March 05
200 61 "lOz
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing -r )v f"
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 14 & 18
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information [ _3 (r-. ??5 V D
1. Owner/Applicant Information
JUL 0 6 2006
Name: Landfall Partners LLC ATTN: Ralph Huff NR - WATER QUALITY CH
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 87555 WETWDS9
Favetteville. NC 28304
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Infornation (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Chris Flowers
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:_ [e-mail]
Page I of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires infonnation to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Roslin Fanms
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0421-09-9279
4. Location
County: Cumberland Nearest Town: Hope Mills
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Roslin Farms
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Interstate 95 exit
off at Chicken Foot Rd. and head East. Take the third right onto John McMIllian Rd. and
then a right onto Roslin Farm Rd., the site is a half of mile on the left.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 34.9024 ON 78.9333 °W
6. Property size (acres):
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Cold Camp Creek
8. River Basin: Lumber River Basin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://12o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is currently wooded and old agriculture fields. The
property was primarily in sunflower farming. The majority of the surrounding property is
agricultural with interspersed residential parcels.
Page 2 of 9
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
overall project is the construction of a residential neighborhood.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the property is to meet the
growing demand for residential housing in southern Cumberland County.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. No prior permits were obtained for this site or project. S&EC conducted
a jurisdictional wetland delineation on the property in January of 2006. In February 2006 the
USACE confirmed S&EC's wetland delineation and issued a Notice of Jurisdictional
Determination on February 17, 2006 (Action ID# 200600416). An application requesting
JD/Sign-off and the issuance of a NWP 39 to cover impacts resulting from the installation of a
culvert was sent the USACE on March 29, 2006. After reviewing the application it was
determined by Lillette Granade of the USACE that a NWP 14 and 18 will be required not a NWP
39.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permits are anticipated at this time.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 3 of 9
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Three impacts are proposed for
this project. There is a proposed stream crossing which is necessary to access useable upland
area and two impacts proposed in wetlands resulting from the installation of filter-fabric and
rip-rap.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
NWP 18 / WQC #3402
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year
Floodplain Nearest
Stream Impact
(acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) es/no linear feet
Ditch #1 outlet Fill (rip-rap/ filter
fabric) Early successional, riparian No 10, 0.0075
Ditch #2 outlet Fill (rip-rap/ filter
fabric) Early successional, riparian No 10, 0.0075
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.015
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: +/- 6 acres (total
includes isolated Carolina Bay)
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
NWP 14 / WQC #3404
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on map)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width

Before Impact Impact
Length

(linear feet) Area of
Impact

(acres)
UT to Cold Camp Culvert and 4 Feet
I Creek Stabilization Perennial 90 Feet 0.008
material
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 0.008
Acres
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Page 4 of 9
Open Water Impact
Name
W
ate Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number
p
e)
plicablle)
(if applicable)
Type of Impact
(lake' pand estuary' sound bay'
Impact
indicate on ma ocean, etc. acres
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Open Water Impact (acres) N/A
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.008
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.015
Open Water Impact acres): N/A
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.023
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 90'
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ® Yes ? No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USAGE.
The isolated Carolina Bav will not be impacted and will be nreserved as oven space as well
as for mitigation purposes.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The impact to the iurisdictional channel that the annlicant has nronosed is required to access
useable upland area within the subdivision. The two impacts resulting from the installation of
rip-rap and filter fabric are necessary for sediment and erosion control. The applicant has
Page 5 of 9
avoided all other jurisdictional areas with respect to their development plan. They have also
proposed to cross the jurisdictional channel at apoint where no jurisdictional wetlands occur
adjacent to the channel thereby avoiding and minimizing the impacts to the jurisdictional
wetlands on the property.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.litrnl.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Because the project is not in a special aquatic site and the impacts to the stream are less
than 150 linear feet and wetland impacts are less than 1/10 acre we believe that no mitigation
should be required for the proposed impacts.
However, if mitigation is required the applicant proposes to preserve the unimpacted
portions of the jurisdictional channel as well as the wetlands adjacent to it. All of the area
outside of the proposed lot lines will be preserved in open space to satisfy county regulations.
Page 6 of 9
The Carolina Bay will also be preserved in open space. The applicant proposes to use the
preservation of the aforementioned areas to mitigate the proposed impacts. A copy of the
preservation agreement between the county and the applicant was previously sent to the
USACE for review. If additional restrictions or guidelines necessary for mitigation are
required they can be added to the existing conservation easement to satisfy miti ag tion
requirements.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Page 7 of 9
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 N/A 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 N/A 1.5 N/A
Total N/A N/A
s Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 213 .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss stormwater
controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property. If
percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations demonstrating total proposed
impervious level. The total proposed impervious surface for the site will be less than 20%.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater will be treated on-site by use of conventional septic systems.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Page 8 of 9
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetIands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: We do
not anticipate this project to act as a catalyst for further development.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
7 j /01
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
JAN-10-2006 11:55 P.02/03
Soil & En ironmental Consultants, PA
11014 Raven Ridge Ra•d - ksicigls, North C=404 27614 - runner [phone] - F= (919) W-9d67
• WWWstodEc'oota
AGENT.AUTHORIZADON FORM
Name:
PAeTNeA?z5. LLC Lz:)-Ao-PW
Address: ?o fox 17555
Phone: ??o -- ?IXJ" ??( !"
Project N ption: S&EC Pro ca #
Date: /D -,-JidN /Z04V &
114 Depmunent of the Army
U.S. Army Cotes of Eagiacas, Wile Disuict
P.O. Box 2894
Wilmington, NC 28442
Attn: G, 1 i; 8e,
field Office: w,' I
Re: Wdlands Mated Consulting and Permitting
To Whom it may Concern:
L the current liltdowtur a oipa?-afTsei?d? hereby dmignate and authorize soil & Mviro==tal Coos hats,
PA to act in my behalf as my agent inthe Processing of permit applications, to W h h upon r uat supplemental
information in support of applications, em from this day forward. The ? day of A-14
This notification supersedes any pr wlous correspond=4 concerning the agent for this project.
NOTIM This autharkstion, for llabillty and profrsaional courtcay reasoar, Ls valid only for Covernuunt ofticlaU to
enter the property when accompauled by S&EC stRM Yoe should ta116&EC to arran9c a the meeting prior to
vW ing the tlte.
):Z&Lp?du t?- 0/' 1-,
Print Property Owner's ezmi Property rler'atiE?s-sip
cc: Ms. C ,zdi Y.aroly co: W. Chris Flowers
NCDENR - DWQ Soil & Environrncnial Coexulwits, PA
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Italei&b. NC 27604
C rloae QTTico;?,ytc„?QPfrr_
236 LzM111p Cauct, Suite C G=MsbLoc co, NC 27455
2
Coecacd, NC 28025 ?s 544.8134
34
Phony [phone] phone- (3336) ) 58
Fax; [phone] Pax: [phone]
{I b
Ook
Ch*4 75
•4 \` / U4allJierry } >, ay;?
• ' . \
\
\/\{/? \ , / y d f 1
\1918 .r`?\? l ( ti ?? <- ?? ? , ? •, !4:
r? \1 P \ \ ?? raw s 1 ?.f??r ? ? xi C
61
?• `/ F \ ?.?`--, j' a ?- •: ??:. _,_.
,Cam I
Project No. Figure I - 1:24K USGS
965 i •w I Topographic Quadrangle
Project Mgr.: ROSIin Farms
CF ? Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Jim Kizer 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
scale: Cumberland County, NC [phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
1 2,000,
slope Mills Quadrangle
0 1 /24/06
APPROX. C/L STREAM -
JURISDICTIONAL CHANNEL
20' DRAINAGE EASM'T I 1
I
4 STREAM HA K 1
4' WIDE I I I
APRON LENGTH-22'
6' D,I.P,

0
ru o
o cn
O
ca
v
I
RIP-RAP STONE
W/ FILTER FABRIC
0+24 LT.
DBL. 36' HEADWALL
INV. OUT 162.00
5
o C •
IMPACTED--AR
4' WIDE ?.
RIP-RAP STONE
1 W/ FILTER FABRIC 0+24 RT.
STREJDANK DBL. 36' H??? D
4' INV. IN 16 1'! D
A? 20' DRAINAGE EASM; I 1 JUL 0 6 2006
pC APPROX. C/L STREAM -
JURISDICTIONAL CHANNEL QUALITY
IMPACTED AREA= 48'x 4' Pius Rip-Rap=360SF.= 0.008 AC.
r`
r;
cn
r-
170
160
VICINITY MAP
N.T.C.
.-I i A
ray R4
4+00
ENGINEERS D
PLANNERS r
SURVEYORS
M131IRMANXIZER & REITZEL,INC.
115 BROADFOOT AVE. FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. 28305
PHDNE [phone] FAX [phone]
WATERS OF THE US IMPACTION MAP
ROSLIN FARMS SUBDIVISION
PROPERTY ?F
LANDFALL PARTNERS LLC
Rockfish Twp• Cumberland Co„ N.C.
November 2005
RAWN BY DAM DATE 12-20-05
HECKED BY JMK JR. SCALE 1 "= 40'
PPROVED BY A of
2+00 3+00
SEDIMENT BASIN ;A"B"
;WILL BE REMOVED.Y
I
DITCH #3.
/ 2 0.20%

N/ ROCK CHECK DAM
(See Detail Ditch
#1 and Ditch #2
Outlet Points)
Sheet 2 of 2
"INSERT
VICINITY MAP
>Y POND RD.
¢249
1
r
r
r
r
r
CE r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
SEDIMENT BASIN" A "
(PILL BE REMOVED)
MAP`(
ENGINEERS o D
PLANNERS O
SURVEYORS
MOORMANXIZER & REITZEL,INC.
115 BROADF00T AVE. FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. 28305
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
WETLAND IMPACTION MAP FOR DRAINAGE DITCH #1 & #2
ROSLIN FARMS SUBDIVISION
PROPERTY ?F
LANDFALL PARTNERS LLC
Rockfish Twp. Cumberland Co., N.C.
November 2005
DRAWN BY DAM DATE 6-14-06
CHECKED BY DAM SCALE 1 "= 40'
APPROVED BY A Sheet
RIP-RAP W/
FILTER FABRIC

DITCH #1 OUTLET
IMPACTED AREA=Rip-Rap Stone & Filter Fabric=336 SF.= 0.0075 AC.
RIP-RAP W/
FILTER FABRIC

DITCH #2 ?UTL_E T
IMPACTED AREA=Rip-Rap Stone & Filter Fabric=336 SF.= 0.0075 AC.
"INSERT MAP//
?µTCR CDC RD ENGINEERS
PLANNERS
SURVEYORS
MC?RMAN,KIZER & REITZEL,INC.
115 BROADFOOT AVE. FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. 28305
Y RD PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
su?cA?D WETLAND IMPACTION MAP FOR DRAINAGE DITCH #1 & 42
ftir SITE
Poo ROSLIN FARMS SUBDIVISION
FP?, ?,NADY RD
sx, 2249 PROPERTY ?F
9s - LANDFALL PARTNERS LLC
ROSLIN FARM RD. R. 2243 Rockfish Twp. Cumberland Co., N.C.
n November 2005
DRAWN BY DAM DATE 6-14-06
VICINITY MAP CHECKED BY DAM SCALE 1''= 401
N APPROVED BY A Sheet 2 of 2
D' (D. I I O a Date 6 Who Reviowed.,'_G__??
1 b•
Plan Detail Incomplete
? Pleaso provide a location map for the project.
? Please show all stream impacts including all fill slopes, dissipaters, and bank stabilization on a sito plan.
?. Please show all wetland impacts including fill slopes on the site plan. w?
? Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan. lY" /
? Please indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on the site plan.
? Please indicate the location of the protected buffcas as overlays on the site pl=
? Please locate all isolated or non-isolated wetlands, streams and other waters of the State as overlays on the site plan.
? Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage.
? Please locate any planned-sewer lines on the sito plan
? Please provido iho location of any proposed stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Pleaso provido detail for tho stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Pleaso spocify tho percent of project imperviousness area based on the estimated built-out conditions:
? Please indicate all stormwate'r ?ontfalls on the site plait.
? Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan. yl
? Please indicate whether or not the proposed impacts already been conducted
Avoidance and/or Minimization Not Provided
?J? ,.0:+,?,, a i. ?; td~ o.
Tho? ` labeled as on the plans does not appear to be necessary. Please eliminato tho . or provido additional 0
information as to why it is necessary for this project..
? This Office believes that tho labeled on tho plans as can be moved, or reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the
Pleaso revise the plans to avoid thq impacts.
?. This'Offico believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to minimize the impacts tq'tho
Please revise the plans to minimize the impacts. Ck`} J
? Tho stormwater discharges at the location on the plans labeled will not provide diffuso flow through the buff b0a use c3?Cp,?p
. Please revise the plans and provide calculations to show that diffuso flow will be achieved through the cntirobuffcr. If it- -f-
is not possible to achieve dlffuso flow through. the entire buffer then it may be necessary to provide stormwater management ,Ae;'t OA.
practices that remove nutrients before the stormwatcr can be discharged through tho. buffer.
Otlier ;
?. The application fee was insufficient-bocauso over 150 feet of stream and/or.ovcr 1 acro ofwetlandInpacts were requested. Please
provide S This additional fee must be received before your application can be reviewed.
? Please complete Section(s) on tho application. -
? Please provide a signed copy of the application.'
? Please provide _ copies of the application, . copies of the site plims and other supporting information:
? Please submit electronic CAD files showing ; via-cinail to ian.mcmillan@n=ail.net and CD.,
Mitigation
? of compensatorymitigation is required for this pioject.'Please providea compensatory mitigation plan. The
plan must conform to tharcquirements in 15 A NCAC 2H .0500 and must be appropriate to the type-of impacts proposed.
? Please indicate which 404 Permit the USACE would use to authorize this project. .
DWQ# O b - 110-2- Date S1-11 -6(0
Plan Detall)ncomplete _
Who Reviewed:
? Please provide a location map for the project.
? Please show all stream impacts including all fill slopes, dissipaters, and bank stabilization on the site plan.
?. Please show all wetland impacts including fill slopes on the site plan.
? Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan. C•W
? Please indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on the site plan. IA P
? Please indicate the location of the protected buffers as overlays on the site plan.
S?
? Please locate all isolated or non-isolated wetlands, streams and other waters of the State as overlays on the site plan.
? Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage-
F1 Please locate any planned-sewer lines on the site plan.
? Please provide the location of any proposed stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please specify the percent of project imperviousness area based on the estimated built-out conditions.
? Please indicate all stormwat ioi}tfalls on the site ease.
? Please indicate the diffuso flow provision measures on the site plan.
? Please indicate whether or not the proposed impacts already born conducted.
Avoidince•andlor AUnimlzation Not Provided
? The labeled as on the plans does not appear to be necessary. Please eliminate the. or provide additional
information as to why it is necessary for this project 3
d s , ?.c?•-tt a" ? p: 41 a fi it t?? ?'°e ci i re 4 a vl d
This ffice believes that the labeled on the plans as can-ba-orhe impacts to the
W e Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts.
S61cttI ?1De: AVD?d?d?
?. This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to minimize the impacts to the
Please revise the plans to minimize the impacts,
? The stormwater discharges at the location on the plans labeled will not provide diMso flow through the buffer because
Please revise the plans and provide calculations to show that diffuse flow will be achieved through the endmbuffer. If it
is not possible to achieve diffuse flow through the entire buffer then it may be necessary to provido stormwater management
practices that remove nutrients before the stormwater can be discharged through the buffer. .
Other
?. The application fee was insufficient because over 150 feet of stream andlor.over 1 acre otwedand'impacts were requested. Please
provide $ This additional fee must be received before your application can be reviewed.
? Please complete Section(s) on the application.
? Please provide a signed copy of the application.'
? Please provide copies of the application, . copies of the site plans and other supporting information:
? Please submit electronic CAD files showing , via email to ian.mcmillan&cmail.nct and CD.
Mitigation
? of compensatorymitigation is required for this project , Please providea compensatory mitigation plan. The
plan must conform to the requirements in 15 A NCAC 2H'.0.500 and must be appropriate to the type of impacts proposed.
? Please indicate which 404 Permit the USACE would use to authorize this project.
r / ?y C
DWQ# Z ?d ail l ?? Date ?1 d ?t Who Reviewed:
Plan Detail Incomplete
1
? Please provide a location map for the project.
? Please show all stream impacts including all fill slopes, dissipaters, and bank stabili lion on the site plan.
? Please show all wetland impacts including fill slopes on the site plan. (?t 0 0 C_V J/` A
? Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan. 1 V ?v ?' Y
? Plea so indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on the site plan. l
p UJ? SCt? i Ed
? Please indicate the location of the protected buffers as overlays on the site plan.
? Please locate all isolated or non-isolated wetlands, streams and other waters of the State as overlays on the site plan.
? Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage.
? Please locate any planned-sewer lines on the site plan. Y ??"J y?? p
? Please provide the location of any proposed stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please specify the percent of project imperviousness area based on the estimated built-out conditions.
? Please indicate all stormwat 7 outfalls on the site plarl.
? Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan.
? Please indicate whether or not the proposed impacts already been conducted.
Avofdance.aud/or Minimization Not Provided
? - The labeled as on the plans does not appear to be necessary. Please eliminate the. or provide additional
information as to why it is necessary for this project.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved. or reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the
Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts.
?. This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to minimize the impacts to the
Please revise the plans to minimize the impacts.
? The stormwater discharges at the location on the plans labeled will not provide diffuse flow through the buffer because
Please revise the plans and provide calculations to show that diffuse flow will be achieved through the entire buffer. If it
is not possible to achieve diffuse flow through the entire buffer then it may be necessary to provide stormwater management
practices that remove nutrients before the stormwater can be discharged through the buffer. .
Other
? . The application fee was insufficient because over 150 feet of stream and/or over I acre of wcdand'impacts were requested. Please
provide $ This additional fee must be received before your application can be reviewed.
? Please complete Section(s) on the application.
? Please provide a signed copy of the application.
? Please provide copies of the application, copies of the site plans and other supporting information:
? Please submit electronic CAD files showing via email to [e-mail] and M
Mitigation
? of compensatorymitigation is required for this project. Please provide a compensatory mitigation plan. The
plan must conform to the requirements in 15 A NCAC 2H .0500 and must be appropriate to the type of impacts proposed.
? Please indicate which 404 Permit the USACE would use to authorize this project.
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
NC Division of Water Quality
Tr.,n H Invoice Type Date Reference
12350 08022006 Invoice 08/02/06 9881.W1 Permit App.
Check Plurcber
Date: 8/2/2006 Check rTt:
Balance Disccunt
$200.00 $0.00
x.2006
AU ? 0 ?
001346
1346
$200.00
Fay A^'unt_
$200.00