20060992 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20060620

o?OF wArF9 G
r
>
? Y
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
la LS ? ? 0 006
ff D
JAN 2 4 2007
Lightkeeper Estates DENK - k, ER QUALITY
Post Office Box 250 VV8TIANOSANDSTORMNu1TERNWCN
Hatteras, NC 27943
Subject Property: Lightkeeper Estates
DWQ EXP # 2006-0992
# 7005 1820 0003 6594 8686
Dare County
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions-Express Review Program
Dear Mrs. Trisha Midgett and Bette Gray:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
within or otherwise impact 0.35 acres of wetlands for the purpose of access road construction and impact
0.10 acres of wetlands for the purpose of residential construction at the subject property, as described
within your application dated June 15, 2006 and received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
on June 19, 2006. After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by
General Water Quality Certification Number 3404 (GC3404) and Number (GC3402). The Certification
allows you to use Nationwide Permit 14 and Nationwide Permit 18 issued by the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE). In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal,
state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and
Sediment Control, Non-discharge, and Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules. Also, this approval to proceed
with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall
expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit. (This Supercedes condition 19 of General
Certification 3403 issued on March, 2003.)
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of
wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A
NCAC 2H.0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved includins incidental impacts:
Amount Approved (Units) Plan Location or Reference
Stream 0 feet
404/CAMA Wetlands 0.35 (acres) Area #1 Road Access
401 Oversight/ Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] / Intemet: htto://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncvvetla nds
One
Caro
Npi Carolina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
?0F WA rF9 G
? Q
r
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr„ Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
0 W aw 006
v °' D
JAN 2 4 2007
Lightkeeper Estates DENK - ?v tii Eft QUALITY
Post Office Box 250 YVETL MANDSTORt4NWTERBRWA
Hatteras, NC 27943
Subject Property: Lightkeeper Estates
DWQ EXP # 2006-0992
# 7005 1820 0003 6594 8686
Dare County
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions-Express Review Program
Dear Mrs. Trisha Midgett and Bette Gray:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
within or otherwise impact 0.35 acres of wetlands for the purpose of access road construction and impact
0.10 acres of wetlands for the purpose of residential construction at the subject property, as described
within your application dated June 15, 2006 and received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
on June 19, 2006. After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by
General Water Quality Certification Number 3404 (GC3404) and Number (GC3402). The Certification
allows you to use Nationwide Permit 14 and Nationwide Permit 18 issued by the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE). In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal,
state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and
Sediment Control, Non-discharge, and Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules. Also, this approval to proceed
with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall
expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit. (This Supercedes condition 19 of General
Certification 3403 issued on March, 2003.)
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of
wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A
NCAC 2H.0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
aooroved including incidental impacts:
Amount Approved (Units) Plan Location or Reference
Stream 0 feet
404/CAMA Wetlands 0.35 (acres) Area #1 Road Access
401 Oversight/ Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] / Internet: htto://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
N Nom` Caro ina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
0. 10 acres Area #2 Residential
Waters 0 acres
Buffers 0 (square ft.
2. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in
accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
3. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond
the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction
activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion
control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality
standards, statutes, or rules occur.
4. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum
extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters
is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date
that the Division of Land Resources has released the project.
5. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable
Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached
certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
6. Additional Conditions
Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands shall be placed below
the elevation of the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater that 48 inches,
and 20 percent of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches, to allow
low flow passage of water and aquatic life. Design and placement of culverts and other structures
including temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may result
in disequilibrium of wetlands or streambeds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and down stream of
the above structures. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the equilibrium is being
maintained if requested in writing by DWQ. If this condition is unable to be met due to bedrock
or other limiting features encountered during construction, please contact the NC DWQ for
guidance on how to proceed and to determine whether or not a permit modification will be
required.
If concrete is used during construction, a dry work area should be maintained to prevent contact
between curing concrete and stream water. Water that inadvertently contacts uncured concrete
should not be discharged to surface waters due to the potential for elevated pH and possible
aquatic life and fish kills.
During the construction of the project, no staging of equipment of any kind is permitted in waters
of the U.S., or protected riparian buffers.
All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters must be regularly inspected and
maintained to prevent contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or
other toxic materials.
The permittee and its authorized agents shall conduct its activities in a manner consistent with
State water quality standards (including any requirements resulting from compliance with
§ 303(d) of the Clean Water Act) and any other appropriate requirements of State and Federal
law. If DWQ determines that such standards or laws are not being met (including the failure to
sustain a designed or achieved use) or that State and Federal law is being violated, or that further
conditions are necessary to assure compliance, DWQ may reevaluate and modify this
certification.
All fill slopes located in jurisdictional wetlands shall be placed at slopes no flatter than 3:1, unless
otherwise authorized by this certification.
A copy of this Water Quality Certification shall be posted on the construction site at all times. In
addition, the Water Quality Certification and all subsequent modifications, if any, shall be
maintained with the on-site project manager.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or
stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of
the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Kyle Barnes at 252-948-3917 or Roberto Scheller at
252-948-3940 in the Washington Regional Office.
Sincerely,
For Man JVi ?me . P.
Enclosures: GC 3404, GC 3402
Certificate of Completion
cc: USACE Washington Regulatory Field Office
DLR Washington Regional Office
File Copy
401 Unit/Central Files
Filename: 2006-0992
1
'bltllll?t ?i
?,Y, ro1?M??lumb?r. ; OebO4§ ?' Y? Da 1 x ?1 ?utut lt>fu d IA.StAcbv4,0, .. Ptohctutu d
•PrS1RM NarnO: 94 %GE `Piolact rypta: other
Pral?ct disc.:ii Hp! A 0 ndnd ipiJC, be" ch 414
c ??1w1 Orb , ` w E
'RocoN$dFrom: DOM r pMottneitwi - COEIDt, OG111?1?.; 'Pnmory Coun*., Dsn
l'
M' M6alUon Railbr D sDOT.O `L •Admin Rlplon; W?thl n`
RocMlwd Dt QOl1 0i>wdu?asy opy Gl in rons putii? land Rivllwrr b Ii k
jy
?qulFn?
1liil?dDl h A1111?If ??s=5 ? t Cll} P} r i'{ ? 4i, `"
F K i a [? tr
Dk- DO'M OIAcs CM ?I F 4 fi * , pWV Plan Roca"d Dk ? y ; t o
_OW
;9WPI1hMdrovidDt' 3 Ppp(IcNobco Pu611ihodDt
?'OE Omc• n0?1l1 ?glil}b1 . _ L
X11 b? Upg4t?d By ItiUti a 'd ` BWPI?n'Locabdrr ? + . !? Public Nobcs Rioo?yed,Qr
41tl 4pdtled On: 0?100I?006 ;.- 8e"90 DIePoOO,l P.N. Oomment Penod Ehd/ Dt' r
r "'.deck JNe?u» n ?i ??_ ?loi• `
:?_ -- --- - - - - --- - rROedy 1Pppe VII r81Di WP1
Lightkeeper Estates
C/O Trisha Midgett and Bette Gray
Dare County
Express Permit Review Program
Page Two
Project description
The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into 5 residential building lots
comprised of two oceanfront lots and three lots immediately off NC 12. An asphalt access
road with a cul-de-sac is proposed off NC 12 to give access to the three interior lots. The
applicant proposes to come off the cul-de-sac with a filled driveway in the 404-wetland area
to terminate with a parking area on the two proposed oceanfront lots. Two 2' by ±24' long
culverts will be placed in the existing ditch to maintain a hydrologic connection to the 404
wetland. The filled driveway will be constructed using ±2' of sand fill and will have a base
width of ±20' and a total length of ±6411. The top width of the drive will be ±10' wide and
will be gravel. As proposed, the new driveway will abut the adjoining campground property
along the property line. All of the proposed parking area and the majority of the driveway
will be located in the 404 wetland area. The total area for the driveway and parking impact
in the 404 wetland is ±15,009 ft2 and the applicant proposes to apply for a Nationwide #14
Permit from the USACOE for this impact.
In order to meet the small structure setback, ± 4,275 ftZ of 404 wetlands will be filled
to create uplands for the construction of 2 - 42' by 50' (2,100 ftZ footprint) dwellings for the
oceanfront lots. The proposed building sites include existing uplands and the proposed fill
will square off the two sites and connect them to the aforementioned parking area created
from filled 404 wetlands. The applicant proposes to apply for a Nationwide #18 Permit
from the USACOE for this impact.
Septic systems are proposed for all 5 lots with the two oceanfront lots using a
pumping system to a designated area on the upland property on the western side of the
property associated with NC 12. All sewer, water, electric, and telephone lines will be
installed in the proposed filled driveway for the oceanfront lots.
Access to the beach is proposed by constructing a 6' wide by ±67' long elevated
wooden access over 404 wetlands connecting the new parking area to the uplands. The
beach access (±250' long) will then be on existing sand grade with sand fence on each
side to control pedestrian access and reduce the damage to the dune structure. A 6' wide
by 65' long wooden access is proposed over the primary dune to the public beach. On
either side of this access the applicant proposes to construct ±174 ft2 octagon shaped
gazebos connected to the access by 6' wide by ±101 long wooden structures.
Anticipated Impacts
The project as proposed will result in the filling of ±19,608 ft2 of 404 wetlands for the
construction of a driveway with parking and two building pads. The construction of the
beach access will shade ±402 ft2 of 404 wetlands and impact _+ 858 ft2 of dune structure.
Approximately ±53,548 ft2 of uplands will be disturbed as a result of the development
activities.
David W. Moye - 19 June 2006
Lightkeeper Estates
C/O Trisha Midgett and Bette Gray
Dare County
Express Permit Review Program
Project setting
Brian Rubino with Quible & Associates, on behalf of Mrs. Trisha Midgett and Mrs.
Bette Gray, has requested the attached application be processed under the Express
Permit Review Program, for a five-lot subdivision with ocean access under the name of
Lightkeeper Estates.
The project site is located in the Town of Rodanthe at 23731 NC 12 on the Atlantic
Ocean in Dare County, North Carolina. The proposed project site comprises ±6.67 acres
and is currently undeveloped.
A portion of the project site is within the Ocean Hazard Area of Environmental
Concern (AEC) as identified in North Carolina Administrative Code 15A NCAC 07H.0304.
All development within this area is subject to authorization by the Division of Coastal
Management.
The property runs from the Atlantic Ocean to NC 12 and is ±1,485' deep. The site
has ±177' of oceanfront shoreline and widens slightly as you move inland to a width of
±212' adjacent NC 12. The first ±500' of the site from NC 12 towards the ocean is sandy
soil uplands vegetated with live oak, upland grasses, bay, and wax myrtle. The center
±600' of the property is an area that has been delineated as a 404 wetland by William
Wescott of the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE). This 404 wetland area is
dominated by Juncus roemerianus, and also has Spartina patens, Cladium iamaicense,
Limonium spp., Scirpus sm, and pennywort. Although many Coastal Wetland species are
present, this area is not subject to regular or irregular flooding and has not been claimed as
a Coastal Wetland under the jurisdiction of the Division of Coastal Management. An
approximately 8' wide ditch bisects the 404 wetland area in a north to south alignment.
The remainder of the site transitions from the wetland area to sandy uplands vegetated
with upland grasses, bay and wax myrtle, and then into a low-lying frontal dune system with
sea oats and American Beach grass (Ammophila sp.). American Beach grass has recently
been sprigged to re-establish vegetation along the oceanfront. The Ocean Hazard AEC
line has been established and is located in the 404 wetland area approximately center way
of the site. The first line of stable vegetation has been set by Mr. Jim Meads (LPO for Dare
County). Mr. Meads has also set the small structure setback for the site at ±285' from the
first line of stable vegetation.
The project site is bordered on the north (upstream) side by developed single-family
oceanfront properties with similar vegetation and the wetland area described above
terminates in this area. The site is bordered on the south (downstream) side by a
campground. Originally the campground property was bisected with the same ditch and
404 wetland area as described on the applicant's property. At some point in the past, the
campground site placed a culvert in the ditch across the entire property and filled the
wetland to create uplands from NC 12 to the ocean effectively cutting off surface waterflow
to the subject property.
The Atlantic Ocean is classified as SB by the Environmental Management
Commission and is not open to shell fishing. The site is ±5' above the normal water level.
0114(4/ C- a-- i w _ V
qa
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F. Easley, Governor Charles S. Jones, Director William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
19 June 2006
EXPRESS PERMIT REVIEW PROGRAM
MEMORANDUM
TO: Cyndi Karoly
Division of Water Quality p I? 0\VIP
L? u
FROM: David W. Moye
Express Permits Coordinator JUN 2 0 2006
DENR - WGTER QUALITY
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review WETLANDSANDSTORMWATERBRANCH
Applicant: Trisha Midgett and Bette Gray
Lightkeeper Estates
Project Location: Adjacent the Atlantic Ocean at 23731 NC 12 in Rodanthe in Dare County,
North Carolina
Proposed Project: The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into 5 lots (2 oceanfront
and three street side, construct an asphalt access road, fill 404 wetlands
for a gravel driveway and two home sites, construct an elevated wooden
walkway over 404 wetlands, construct two gazebos and a shared wooden
access to the beach.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return
this form by 10 July 2006. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please
contact David W. Moye at 252-948-3852. When appropriate, in-depth comments with
supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
SIGNED DATE
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net/
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper
Quible
Quible & Associates, RC,
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING
SINCE 1959
June 15, 2006
TRANSMITTAL
RE: Lightkeeper Estates
Express 401 Water Quality Permitting
To: Kyle Barnes, DWQ
From: Brian Rubino
k) LP - og92,
P.O. Drawer 670
Kitty Hawk, NC 27949
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
PRINCIPALS
Sean C. Boyle, P.E.
Joseph S. Lassiter, C.E.P.
Eduardo J. Valdivieso, P.E.
ASSOCIATES
Joseph J. Anlauf, P.E.
Katherine C. Marchello, P.L.S.

JUN 1 9 2006
E,ftii.;f
Mr. Barnes:
This 401 Water Quality Certification Package for Lightkeeper Estates in Rodanthe, Dare County
addresses items that we discussed during the May 31, 2006 pre-application meeting. According to our
discussions, DWQ will have the opportunity to review this project through this PCN Application
submission and through the CAMA Major submission. Enclosed are seven copies of the following:
• Project Narrative
• PCN Application
• USACE Jurisdictional Determination (3-29-04)
• Portion of Applicable USGS Vicinity Map
• Portion of Dare County Soil Survey, Sheet 18
• NCEEP, In Lieu Request Form
• Letter from Jazania O'Neal (December 2005) denying access through her campground property
If you have any questions or require any additional information for this permit request, you can reach me
at [phone]. Thanks for your attention to this project.
Respectfully Submitted,
1v` llz?
Brian Rubino
J&z!kRflW75
@D
JUL 0 5 2006
WEII
AM)
ATJF? rCH
Quible
Quible & Associates, P.C,
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING
SINCE 1959
June 15, 2006
TRANSMITTAL
RE: Lightkeeper Estates
Nationwide #14 and #18 Permitting
To: Raleigh Bland, USACE
From: Brian Rubino
Mr. Bland:
P.O. Drawer 870
Kitty Hawk, NC 27949
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
PRINCIPALS
Sean C. Boyle, P.E.
Joseph S. Lassiter, C.E.P.
Eduardo J. Valdivieso, P.E.
ASSOCIATES
Joseph J. Anlauf, P.E.
Katherine C. Marchello, P.L.S.
This Nationwide #14 and #18 Application Package for Lightkeeper Estates in Rodanthe, Dare County
addresses items that we discussed during the May 31, 2006 pre-application meeting. I have submitted
seven copies of this information to Kyle Barnes at NCDWQ for Water Quality Certification. This
package includes:
• Project Narrative
• PCN Application
• USACE Jurisdictional Determination (3-29-04)
• Portion of Applicable USGS Vicinity Map
• Portion of Dare County Soil Survey, Sheet 18
• NCEEP, In Lieu Request Form
• Letter from Jazania O'Neal (December 2005) denying access through her campground property
If you have any questions or require any additional information for this permit request, you can reach me
at [phone]. Thanks for your attention to this project.
Respectfully Submitted,
1>.,? /Z-A-,
Brian Rubino
PROJECT NARRATIVE- Lightkeeper Estates May 30, 2006, Revised June 13, 2006
Existing Conditions
The subject property is located is located on the east side of NC 12 in Rodanthe, Dare County, North
Carolina. The subject property is an approximately 6.67 acre parcel of property. The applicants/owners
for this Major CAMA application, Trisha Midgett and Bette Gray have owned the parcel since February
2004.
There is a section 404 wetland area in the central portion of the property that encompasses a drainage
ditch that runs in a north to south direction. This wetland area has been determined by NC Division of
Coastal Management (DCM) to not include any jurisdictional "coastal wetlands" The ditch does retain
shallow water during times of normal precipitation, but it is commonly found to become dry. East of the
Section 404 area is a broad upland area that lies within the Ocean Hazard AEC with sandy soils and
herbaceous and estuarine shrub-type vegetation. There is also a low-lying frontal dune that is capable of
migrating, eroding or accreting. However, erosive forces do currently dominate in this area. According
to DCM, the maximum erosion rate is 9.5 ft/yr in this vicinity of beach front. The current FLSNV has
been verified by CAMA LPO from Dare County, Jim Meads on May 4, 2006. This location is
approximately 60 ft landward of the pre- Hurricane Isabel Line that had formerly been established. The
owners have recently (March-April 2006) installed sections of sand fence and have planted american
beachgrass sprigs oceanward of the existing FLSNV. It is the intention of the owners to establish good
vegetative growth along the oceanfront where the former FLSNV was prior to Hurricane Isabel. This
would help protect the existing FLSNV from being pushed further landward.
In the past, the applicants have applied for a CAMA variance and have been formerly denied. The
variance was to request that a residential structure be built on the oceanfront by utilizing NCAC standard
T15A: 07H .0309 Use Standards for Ocean Hazard Areas: Exceptions. Denial was due to the presence of
buildable area on the parcel to the west of the Section 404 area. Therefore, in order to build on the
oceanfront at all, the small structure setback would have to be met, which is 285 ft from the current First
Line of Stable Natural Vegetation (FLSNV).
Proposed Work
As depicted on the accompanying site plan, the applicant proposes to subdivide the 6.67 acre tract into
five single family residential lots. This includes the creation of an access road over an area of existing
jurisdictional wetlands to two oceanfront lots (lots 1 and 2).
Prior to applying for the Nationwide 14 for the access road, requests were made to the adjacent property
(O'Neal Campground) owner to use their property to access the oceanfront lots. The owner, Jazania
O'Neal has provided a letter stating that the use of their property is not feasible (enclosed letter dated
December 5, 2005). To minimize the impacts, the proposed fill on the subject property has been
proposed adjacent to the historically filled O'Neal Campground, linking to existing uplands, as to not
create a separate "land dam". At one point, the applicant discussed with the adjacent owner on the north
side (County of Dare) to be joint applicants, and propose a road on the north property boundary. This
could have provided ocean access to the County and the applicant. However, after further investigation,
the County has an existing Water Quality Protection Easement on their property which limits their ability
1 of 2

to permit public crossing. There is a proposed public roadway with a cul-de-sac in the front of the
property, off of NC 12 which does not require any wetlands impacts. The private driveway, which is
proposed as an extension off of the cul-de-sac, is proposed to be backfilled with compacted sandy
material and topped with crushed gravel. Current conditions do not allow for access to the buildable lots
on the east side without construction of this driveway. There are numerous existing structures located on
the east side of this wetland area to the north and south of the subject tract. For the properties to the
north and south, similar proposed access roads have been constructed.
The proposed Section 404 wetland area under jurisdiction of the US Army Corps of Engineers that is
proposed to be filled for the driveway and parking is approximately 641 linear ft (if) and 15,307 sq.ft.
(0.35 ac.). This is proposed under a Nationwide #14 permit from USACE. The travel aisle will be 10 ft
wide (crowned) with vegetated side slopes to be constructed at a 2.5:1 slope (total driveway width
including travel aisle and side slopes is 20 ft). A maximum of 2 ft of sand fill will be necessary to
provide sufficient elevation for the access corridor. There will be no aggregate material placed on the
slopes of the vegetated filter strips.
In order to maintain a surface water hydrologic connection, two (side-by-side) 24 inch diameter culverts
are proposed to be placed in the ditch. The maximum water depth after precipitation events in the ditch
is approximately 0.5 ft (6 inches). Therefore the height of the top of the culvert would be 1.25 ft above
normal water level. The length of the culvert is planned to be 24 ft. The ditch cross-section on the site
plan shows this design.
Also proposed, on future lots 1 and 2, are two residential structures with 2,100 sq.ft. maximum footprints
each, measured from the outer edges of the roof lines. In order to keep these structures entirely outside
the small structure setback, some additional Section 404 wetland fill would be required. The total fill
would be 4,301 sq.ft. (0.10 ac.). This is proposed under a Nationwide #18 permit from USACE.
The total wetlands fill proposed is 0.45 ac. Of this 0.45 acres, 0.35 ac. would fall under a Nationwide
#14 and 0.10 ac, would fall under a Nationwide #18. Of the proposed wetlands fill area, 0.31 ac. are
within the Ocean Hazard AEC. Prior to any land disturbance activity, a silt fence will be installed on
both sides of the fill area. Compensatory mitigation proposed is payment to the NCEEP for freshwater
non-riparian wetlands. A request has been sent to NCEEP for this mitigation. This is proposed at a 2:1
mitigation to impact ratio.
Also proposed, for access to the public beach, is a beach access walkway. The first 67 if of the walkway
will be pile-supported over Section 404 wetlands (See cross-section). The portion of the walkway over
the frontal dune area will also be pile-supported. The majority of this walkway will be on existing sand
grade and will be lined with sand fence. The purpose of this walkway is to direct pedestrian foot traffic
for the subdivision along the same pathway to avoid unnecessary erosion.
Future Work
In the future, lots 3-5 will be sold and developed with single family residences, similar to lots 1 and 2.
These lots are entirely outside of the AEC and will not require CAMA permits. Even though there is no
specific plan for development on these lots, maximum coverages on these lots is referenced in the
NCDWQ, Low-Density Stormwater Management Plan.
2of2
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(It any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification ® Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 14 and 18
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here:
II. Applicant Information Q p ? @ 9 OdC? D
1. Owner/Applicant Information JUL 0 5 2006
Name: Trisha Midgett and Bette Gray
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 250 uENR • WATER QUALITY
Hatteras, NC 27943
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:_ _(252) 987-2554
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Brian Rubino
Company Affiliation: Quible & Associates, P.C.
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 870
Kitty Hawk NC 27949
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 14
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Lightkeeper Estates
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 065805096827
4. Location
County: Dare Nearest Town: Rodanthe
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): No existing subdivision; the future
subdivision is depicted on the accompanying site plan (Lightkeeper Estates Lots 1-5)
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): NC 12 South to Rodanthe
on Hatteras Island; the subject property is immediately south of the Rodanthe Dare County
Water Department facility on the east (ocean side) of NC 12
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.58890 ON 75.46895 °W
6. Property size (acres): 6.67
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water:_ The Pamlico Sound is the nearest water body to
the west side of the property and the Atlantic Ocean is nearest to the east side In addition
there is a drainage ditch in the central portion of the property that holds shallow water during
and after precipitation events.
8. River Basin: Pasquotank
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 14
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The property contains a small graveyard in the southwest
portion of the property which will be protected and preserved Otherwise the property is
currently undeveloped and contains herbaceous and estuarine shrub-type vegetation There
are 2.80 acres of iurisdictional Section 404 wetlands and 3.87 acres of uplands (non-
wetlands).
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project involves creation of a 6.67 acre parcel into a five-lot subdivision A ublic
asphalt surfaced roadway with a cul-de-sac is proposed off of NC 12 and a private extension
off of the cul-de-sac is proposed to access home sites on lots 1 and 2 The private access
corridor (driveway) is proposed to cross Section 404 wetlands since there is no alternate
access to the oceanfront uplands. The roadway will be constructed with the use of dump
trucks, back hoe and other rading and compaction equipment The proposed houses on lots
1 and 2 will be pile-supported. Also proposed is a 67 linear ft pile supported walkway over
Section 404 wetlands. This walkway is to provide a designated access to the public beach for
residents of the subdivision. The walkway will be constructed of slatted wood and will be
elevated 3 ft above wetland substrate. The piles will be washed in place and construction
will not involve filling of iurisdictional wetlands.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the wetlands impacts associated
with the driveway (Nationwide 14) are to provide an access corridor to the uplands located
on the east (ocean side) of the subject property. This access corridor is proposed on the south
side of the subiect property, along an area that adjoins existing uplands on the adjacent
property. The wetlands impacts associated the residential structure construction (Nationwide
18) are to provide sufficient building footprints for lots 1 and 2 While both lots 1 and 2 have
a significant existing upland area adjoining the proposed driveway access ocean hazard
setbacks require a small structure setback from the First Line of Stable Natural Vegetation
(FLSNV) to be 285 ft. Similar lots with much smaller areas in the same vicinity are
permitted to utilize CAMA exception rule (T15A• 07H 0309) to reduce this setback to 60 ft
This large parcel is unable to utilize this reduction in setbacks due to the presence of a
buildable area on the west side of the wetland area A CAMA variance has been applied for
and has received denial. Therefore, in order to meet the ocean hazard setback based on 30
times the maximum annual erosion rate from the FLSNV 0.1 acres of Section 404 wetland
are proposed to be impacted. Prior to hurricane Isabel the FLSNV was on average 60-70 ft
waterward of its present location. The existing FLSNV established on 5-4-06 by Dare
County LPO, is depicted on the site plan. Recent American beachgrass plantings waterward
of the FLSNV have been performed to attempt to protect the FLSNV from additional loss
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 14
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. A jurisdictional determination of Section 404 wetlands (Action ID:
200411316) has been issued on 3-29-04 by William Wescott USACE Other necessary permits
that are being requested at this time include Low Density Stormwater Management (NCDWQ)
Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control (NCDLQ) 401 Water Quality Certification (NCDWQ)
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
There will be a future building permit request to Dare County after required State and Federal
permits are issued.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Impacts to Section 404 wetlands have
been separated into those impacts proposed under a Nationwide 14 and those impacts
proposed under a Nationwide 18. The wetlands on the subject property have been
determined by NCDCM not be "coastal wetlands". Nationwide 14 impacts proposed total
0.35 acres and Nationwide 18 impacts proposed total 0.1 acres
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
senarately list imnaets dne to both ctrnctnrP and flnnrlina
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact

(indicate on map)
herbaceous, bog, etc.)
Flo
odplaiodplain Stream (acres)
( (linear feet)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 14
Area 1 Fill/Grading Estuarine Shrub/ Herbaceous yes 378 to ocean 0.35
Area 2 Fill/Grading Estuarine Shrub/ Herbaceous yes 429 to ocean 0.10

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.45
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 2.80 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage. multiply length X width- then divide by 43 560 N/A
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) N/A
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation. dredging. flooding. drainage- bulkheads- etc N/A
Open Water Impact
Site Number

(indicate on ma) Name Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of

Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the nroiect-
Stream Impact (acres): N/A
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.45
Open Water Impact (acres): N/A
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.45
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): N/A
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 14
Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation N/A
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Prior to applying for the
Nationwide 14 , requests were made to the adjacent property (ONeal Campground) owner to use
their property to access the oceanfront lots The owner Jazania O'Neal has provided a letter
stating that the use of their property is not feasible (enclosed letter dated December 5 2005) To
minimize the impacts the proposed fill on the subject property has been proposed adjacent to the
historically filled O'Neal Campground as to not create a separate "land dam" At one point the
applicant discussed with the adjacent owner on the north side (County of Dare) to be joint
applicants, and propose a road on the north property boundary. This could have provided ocean
access to the County and the applicant. However, after further investigation the County has an
existing Water Quality Protection Easement on their property which limits their ability to permit
public crossing
VIII. Mitigation
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 10 of 14
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Proposed mitigation includes payment into the NC EEP at a 2.1 mitigation to fill ratio A
request to enter the EEP mitigation program has been made (See request document enclosed)
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Updated 11/1/2005
Page I I of 14
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 1.0 acre mitigation
payment requested (0.45 acres impacted)
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ? N/A
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ? N/A
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers. N/A
L I Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(square feet) Mitip-ation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total I I I I
* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 12 of 14
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0244, or.0260. N/A
type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Enhancement, or Payment into the
appropriate information as identified
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. There is no existing impervious coverage on the
site. The total impervious coverage on the property will be 25,417 sq.ft which includes all road
driveway and parking surfaces, maximum house footprints and covered gazebo footprints This
is 15.1 percent of the total upland area on the parcel.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Each of the lots will have on-site septic treatment systems. Each lot has been configured so that
there is sufficient area for on-site systems to be permitted through the Dare County Health
Department.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 13 of 14
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 14 of 14
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
C-nn
Action ID 200411316 County Dare y
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner/Agent: Wilma Midgett Property c/o Claude Mid2ett
Address: 870 Seminole Road
Atlantic Beach, Florida 32233
Telephone No.:
Size and location of property (waterbody, road name/number, town, etc.) 7.91 acre parcel bisected by
the North Drain on the east side of NC12 in Rodanthe Dare County. PIN 065805096827
Indicate Which of the FollowinLx Apply:
There are waters of the U.S. and/or wetlands on the- above described property which we strongly suggest should
be delineated and surveyed. The surveyed wetland lines must be verified by our staff before the Corps will
make a final jurisdictional determination on your property.
Because of the size of your property and our present workload, our identification and delineation of your
wetlands cannot be accomplished in a timely manner. You may wish to obtain a consultant to obtain a more
timely delineation of the wetlands. Once the consultant has flagged a wetland line on the property, Corps staff
will review it, and, if it is accurate, we strongly recommend that you have the line surveyed for final approval
by the Corps. The Corps will not make a final jurisdictional determination on your property without an
approved survey.
X The waters of the U.S. and/or wetlands on your property have been delineated and surveyed, and the limits of
the Corps jurisdiction have been explained to you. Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject
to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in
the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years
from the date of this notification.
X The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in
Elizabeth City, NC, at [phone] to determine their requirements
Placement of dredged or fill material in waters of the US and/or wetlands on this property without a
Department of the Army permit may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33
USC 1311). A permit is not required for work restricted entirely to existing non-wetland area. If you
have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please
contact William Wescott at 252-975-1616 extension 25.
Basis For Determination: Area meets the three parameters specified in the 1987 USACE Wetland
Delineation Manual, and is adiacent to the North Drain which connects to Pamlico Sound
Property Owner/Authorized Agent Signature
! -
Corps Regulatory Official
Date 3-29-2004
Expiration Date 3-29-2009
SURVEY PLAT OR FIELD SKETCH OF THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY AND THE WETLAND
DELINEATION FORM MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM

?
y
?
rCCCC
;?
,?
?
Pauts,A* Da

ill

4i0ht
Uncle Jim
'•"- =
m
Landing N

Waves
11°W
Name:RODANTHE
Date: 4/27/2006
Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet

,?{t
t?
8rot
n. _.1c
r
a
Location: 035° 35'20.05" N 075° 28'8.22" W
Caption: Lightkeeper Estates
23731 NC 12
Rodanthe, Dare County
cn
O
r
to
e
T
O
rv lJ
n
z°
?00
z
0
x
y
x
a
x
0
r
z
a
NORTH CAROLINA ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM, NCEEP
IN LIEU FEE REQUEST FORM
NOTE: Revised 4/19/06
Print this form, fill in required information, sign and date, and either mail to NCEEP, 1652 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652, or fax to 919-715-2219. Attachments are acceptable for clarification purposes. .
Buffer mitigation applicable only in the Neuse, Tar-Pamlico and Catawba river basins, and the Randleman Lake
Water Supply Watershed.
For help in determining the Cataloging Unit, go to EPA's "Surf Your Watershed" web page:
httj?:Hcfi)ub.ei)a.gov/surf/locate/index.cfm
Direct all questions to Chris Mankoff at 919-716-1921 or [e-mail]
December 5, 2005
Mr. & Mrs. Rudy Gray
Mr. & Mrs. Tim Midgett
POB 37
Rodanthe, North Carolina 27968
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Gray & Mr. & Mrs. Midgett:
Pursuant to your request to access your adjoining oceanfront property through my
campground is not feasible. It's with regret that I have to deny your request.
Sincerely yours,
Jazania O'Neal, Owner

C r0l / OJT?1?_ - T 1 /2 C_ 0O
Quible `,) V44
Quible & Associates, P,C, RO,Drawer 870
Kitty Hawk, NC 27949
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING Phone: [phone]
SINCE 1959 0 Fax: [phone]
June 15, 2006
TRANSMITTAL
RE: Lightkeeper Estates
Express 401 Water Quality Permitting
To: Kyle Barnes, DWQ
From: Brian Rubino
Mr. Barnes:
L) to o -I 2
PRINCIPALS
Sean C. Boyle, P.E.
Joseph S. Lassiter, C.E.P.
Eduardo J. Valdivieso, P.E.
ASSOCIATES
Joseph J. Anlauf, P.E.
Katherine C. Marchello, P.L.S.
11llIL® E
JUN 1 9 2006
DWQ-!! YARD
This 401 Water Quality Certification Package for Lightkeeper Estates in Rodanthe, Dare County
addresses items that we discussed during the May 31, 2006 pre-application meeting. According to our
discussions, DWQ will have the opportunity to review this project through this PCN Application
submission and through the CAMA Major submission. Enclosed are seven copies of the following:
• Project Narrative
• PCN Application
• USACE Jurisdictional Determination (3-29-04)
• Portion of Applicable USGS Vicinity Map
• Portion of Dare County Soil Survey, Sheet 18
• NCEEP, In Lieu Request Form
• Letter from Jazania O'Neal (December 2005) denying access through her campground property
If you have any questions or require any additional information for this permit request, you can reach me
at [phone]. Thanks for your attention to this project.
Respectfully Submitted,
Brian Rubino
Quible
Quible & Associates, P.C,
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING
SINCE 1959
June 15, 2006
TRANSMITTAL
RE: Lightkeeper Estates
Nationwide #14 and #18 Permitting
To: Raleigh Bland, USACE
From: Brian Rubino
Mr. Bland:
P.O. Drawer 870
Kitty Hawk, NC 27949
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
PRINCIPALS
Sean C. Boyle, P.E.
Joseph S. Lassiter, C.E.P.
Eduardo J. Valdivieso, P.E.
ASSOCIATES
Joseph J. Anlauf, P.E.
Katherine C. Marchello, P.L.S.
This Nationwide #14 and #18 Application Package for Lightkeeper Estates in Rodanthe, Dare County
addresses items that we discussed during the May 31, 2006 pre-application meeting. I have submitted
seven copies of this information to Kyle Barnes at NCDWQ for Water Quality Certification. This
package includes:
• Project Narrative
• PCN Application
• USACE Jurisdictional Determination (3-29-04)
• Portion of Applicable USGS Vicinity Map
• Portion of Dare County Soil Survey, Sheet 18
• NCEEP, In Lieu Request Form
• Letter from Jazania O'Neal (December 2005) denying access through her campground property
If you have any questions or require any additional information for this permit request, you can reach me
at [phone]. Thanks for your attention to this project.
Respectfully Submitted,
Brian Rubino

V*
PROJECT NARRATIVE- Lightkeeper Estates May 30, 2006, Revised June 13, 2006
Existing Conditions
The subject property is located is located on the east side of NC 12 in Rodanthe, Dare County, North
Carolina. The subject property is an approximately 6.67 acre parcel of property. The applicants/owners
for this Major CAMA application, Trisha Midgett and Bette Gray have owned the parcel since February
2004.
There is a section 404 wetland area in the central portion of the property that encompasses a drainage
ditch that runs in a north to south direction. This wetland area has been determined by NC Division of
Coastal Management (DCM) to not include any jurisdictional "coastal wetlands" The ditch does retain
shallow water during times of normal precipitation, but it is commonly found to become dry. East of the
Section 404 area is a broad upland area that lies within the Ocean Hazard AEC with sandy soils and
herbaceous and estuarine shrub-type vegetation. There is also a low-lying frontal dune that is capable of
migrating, eroding or accreting. However, erosive forces do currently dominate in this area. According
to DCM, the maximum erosion rate is 9.5 ft/yr in this vicinity of beach front. The current FLSNV has
been verified by CAMA LPO from Dare County, Jim Meads on May 4, 2006. This location is
approximately 60 ft landward of the pre- Hurricane Isabel Line that had formerly been established. The
owners have recently (March-April 2006) installed sections of sand fence and have planted american
beachgrass sprigs oceanward of the existing FLSNV. It is the intention of the owners to establish good
vegetative growth along the oceanfront where the former FLSNV was prior to Hurricane Isabel. This
would help protect the existing FLSNV from being pushed further landward.
In the past, the applicants have applied for a CAMA variance and have been formerly denied. The
variance was to request that a residential structure be built on the oceanfront by utilizing NCAC standard
T15A: 07H .0309 Use Standards for Ocean Hazard Areas: Exceptions. Denial was due to the presence of
buildable area on the parcel to the west of the Section 404 area. Therefore, in order to build on the
oceanfront at all, the small structure setback would have to be met, which is 285 ft from the current First
Line of Stable Natural Vegetation (FLSNV).
Proposed Work
As depicted on the accompanying site plan, the applicant proposes to subdivide the 6.67 acre tract into
five single family residential lots. This includes the creation of an access road over an area of existing
jurisdictional wetlands to two oceanfront lots (lots 1 and 2).
Prior to applying for the Nationwide 14 for the access road, requests were made to the adjacent property
(O'Neal Campground) owner to use their property to access the oceanfront lots. The owner, Jazania
O'Neal has provided a letter stating that the use of their property is not feasible (enclosed letter dated
December 5, 2005). To minimize the impacts, the proposed fill on the subject property has been
proposed adjacent to the historically filled O'Neal Campground, linking to existing uplands, as to not
create a separate "land dam". At one point, the applicant discussed with the adjacent owner on the north
side (County of Dare) to be joint applicants, and propose a road on the north property boundary. This
could have provided ocean access to the County and the applicant. However, after further investigation,
the County has an existing Water Quality Protection Easement on their property which limits their ability
1 of 2
to permit public crossing. There is a proposed public roadway with a cul-de-sac in the front of the
property, off of NC 12 which does not require any wetlands impacts. The private driveway, which is
proposed as an extension off of the cul-de-sac, is proposed to be backfilled with compacted sandy
material and topped with crushed gravel. Current conditions do not allow for access to the buildable lots
on the east side without construction of this driveway. There are numerous existing structures located on
the east side of this wetland area to the north and south of the subject tract. For the properties to the
north and south, similar proposed access roads have been constructed.
The proposed Section 404 wetland area under jurisdiction of the US Army Corps of Engineers that is
proposed to be filled for the driveway and parking is approximately 641 linear ft (If) and 15,307 sq.ft.
(0.35 ac.). This is proposed under a Nationwide #14 permit from USACE. The travel aisle will be 10 ft
wide (crowned) with vegetated side slopes to be constructed at a 2.5:1 slope (total driveway width
including travel aisle and side slopes is 20 ft). A maximum of 2 ft of sand fill will be necessary to
provide sufficient elevation for the access corridor. There will be no aggregate material placed on the
slopes of the vegetated filter strips.
In order to maintain a surface water hydrologic connection, two (side-by-side) 24 inch diameter culverts
are proposed to be placed in the ditch. The maximum water depth after precipitation events in the ditch
is approximately 0.5 ft (6 inches). Therefore the height of the top of the culvert would be 1.25 ft above
normal water level. The length of the culvert is planned to be 24 ft. The ditch cross-section on the site
plan shows this design.
Also proposed, on future lots land 2, are two residential structures with 2,100 sq.ft. maximum footprints
each, measured from the outer edges of the roof lines. In order to keep these structures entirely outside
the small structure setback, some additional Section 404 wetland fill would be required. The total fill
would be 4,301 sq.ft. (0.10 ac.). This is proposed under a Nationwide #18 permit from USACE.
The total wetlands fill proposed is 0.45 ac. Of this 0.45 acres, 0.35 ac. would fall under a Nationwide
#14 and 0.10 ac. would fall under a Nationwide #18. Of the proposed wetlands fill area, 0.31 ac. are
within the Ocean Hazard AEC. Prior to any land disturbance activity, a silt fence will be installed on
both sides of the fill area. Compensatory mitigation proposed is payment to the NCEEP for freshwater
non-riparian wetlands. A request has been sent to NCEEP for this mitigation. This is proposed at a 2:1
mitigation to impact ratio.
Also proposed, for access to the public beach, is a beach access walkway. The first 67 If of the walkway
will be pile-supported over Section 404 wetlands (See cross-section). The portion of the walkway over
the frontal dune area will also be pile-supported. The majority of this walkway will be on existing sand
grade and will be lined with sand fence. The purpose of this walkway is to direct pedestrian foot traffic
for the subdivision along the same pathway to avoid unnecessary erosion.
Future Work
In the future, lots 3-5 will be sold and developed with single family residences, similar to lots 1 and 2.
These lots are entirely outside of the AEC and will not require CAMA permits. Even though there is no
specific plan for development on these lots, maximum coverages on these lots is referenced in the
NCDWQ, Low-Density Stormwater Management Plan.
2of2
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. O lu - C) a Ol 2,
(it any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification ® Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 14 and 18
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here:
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Trisha Midgett and Bette Gray
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 250
Hatteras, NC 27943
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: trisham@mid ettg realty.com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Brian Rubino
Company Affiliation: Quible & Associates, P.C.
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 870
Kitty Hawk NC 27949
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Updated H/l/2005
Page 5 of 14
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Lightkeeper Estates
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 065805096827
4. Location
County: Dare Nearest Town: Rodanthe
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): No existing subdivision; the future
subdivision is depicted on the accompanying site plan (Lightkeeper Estates Lots 1-5)
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): NC 12 South to Rodanthe
on Hatteras Island; the subject property is immediately south of the Rodanthe Dare County
Water Department facility on the east (ocean side) of NC 12
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.58890 ON 75.46895 °W
6. Property size (acres): 6.67
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: The Pamlico Sound is the nearest water body to
the west side of the property and the Atlantic Ocean is nearest to the east side In addition
there is adrainage ditch in the central portion of the property that holds shallow water during
and after precipitation events.
8. River Basin: Pasquotank
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 14
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The property contains a small graveyard in the southwest
portion of the property which will be protected and preserved Otherwise the property is
currently undeveloped and contains herbaceous and estuarine shrub-type vegetation There
are 2.80 acres of iurisdictional Section 404 wetlands and 3.87 acres of uplands (non-
wetlands).
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project involves creation of a 6.67 acre parcel into a five-lot subdivision A public
asphalt surfaced roadway with a cul-de-sac is proposed off of NC 12 and a private extension
off of the cul-de-sac is proposed to access home sites on lots 1 and 2. The private access
corridor (driveway) is proposed to cross Section 404 wetlands since there is no alternate
access to the oceanfront uplands. The roadway will be constructed with the use of dump
trucks, back hoe and other grading and compaction equipment The proposed houses on lots
1 and 2 will be pile-supported. Also proposed is a 67 linear ft pile supported walkway over
Section 404 wetlands. This walkway is to provide a designated access to the public beach for
residents of the subdivision. The walkway will be constructed of slatted wood and will be
elevated 3 ft above wetland substrate The piles will be washed in place and construction
will not involve filling of jurisdictional wetlands
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the wetlands impacts associated
with the driveway (Nationwide 14) are to provide an access corridor to the uplands located
on the east (ocean side) of the subject property. This access corridor is proposed on the south
side of the subject property, along an area that adjoins existing uplands on the adjacent
property. The wetlands impacts associated the residential structure construction (Nationwide
18) are to provide sufficient building footprints for lots 1 and 2. While both lots 1 and 2 have
a significant existing upland area adjoining the proposed driveway access ocean hazard
setbacks require a small structure setback from the First Line of Stable Natural Ve etation
(FLSNV) to be 285 ft. Similar lots with much smaller areas in the same vicinity are
permitted to utilize CAMA exception rule (T15A• 07H 0309) to reduce this setback to 60 ft
This large parcel is unable to utilize this reduction in setbacks due to the presence of a
buildable area on the west side of the wetland area A CAMA variance has been applied for
and has received denial. Therefore, in order to meet the ocean hazard setback based on 30
times the maximum annual erosion rate from the FLSNV 0.1 acres of Section 404 wetland
are proposed to be impacted. Prior to hurricane Isabel the FLSNV was on average 60-70 ft
waterward of its present location. The existing FLSNV established on 5-4-06 by are.
County LPO is depicted on the site plan Recent American beach grass plantings waterward
of the FLSNV have been performed to attempt to protect the FLSNV from additional loss
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
Updated 11/ 1 /2005
Page 7 of 14
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along..with
construction schedules. A jurisdictional determination of Section 404 wetlands (Action ID:
200411316) has been issued on 3-29-04 by William Wescott USACE Other necessary permits
that are being requested at this time include Low Density Stormwater Management (NCDWQ)
Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control (NCDLO) 401 Water Quality Certification (NCDWQ)
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
There will be a future building permit request to Dare County after required State and Federal
permits are issued.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Impacts to Section 404 wetlands have
been separated into those impacts proposed under a Nationwide 14 and those impacts
proposed under a Nationwide 18. The wetlands on the subject property have been
determined by NCDCM not be "coastal wetlands" Nationwide 14 impacts proposed total
0.35 acres and Nationwide 18 impacts proposed total 0.1 acres
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list imnacts due to both Strnr.tnre and flnMina
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) FloodPlain Stream acres
( es/no) (linear feet)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 14
Area I Fill/Grading Estuarine Shrub/ Herbaceous yes 378 to ocean 0.35
Area 2 Fill/Grading Estuarine Shrub/ Herbaceous yes 429 to ocean 0.10

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.45
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 2.80 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage. multinly len¢th X width then divide by 43 Sin N/A
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) N/A
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill. excavation- dredging- flooding- drainave_ htilkheadc etr, N/A
Open Water Impact
Site Number

(indicate on ma) Name
(if applicable) ) Wat
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of

Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative imr)act to all Waters of the U.S. resnltinu from the. nrniectr
Stream Impact (acres): N/A
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.45
Open Water Impact (acres): N/A
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.45
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): N/A
Updated I1/1/2005
Page 9 of 14
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation N/A
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Prior to applying for the
Nationwide 14 , requests were made to the adjacent property (ONeal Campground) owner to use
their property to access the oceanfront lots The owner. Jazania O'Neal has provided a letter
stating that the use of their property is not feasible (enclosed letter dated December 5 2005) To
minimize the impacts, the proposed fill on the subject property has been proposed adjacent to the
historically filled O'Neal Campground as to not create a separate "land dam" At one point the
applicant discussed with the adjacent owner on the north side (County of Dare) to be joint
applicants, and propose a road on the north property boundary. This could have provided ocean
access to the County and the applicant. However, after further investigation the County has an
existing Water Quality Protection Easement on their property which limits their ability to permit
public crossing
VIII. Mitigation
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 10 of 14
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands/strm,gide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Proposed mitigation includes payment into the NC EEP at a 2.1 mitigation to fill ratio A
request to enter the EEP mitigation program has been made (See request document enclosed)
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Updated I1/1/2005
Page I 1 of 14
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 1.0 acre mitigation
payment requested (0.45 acres impacted)
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ? N/A
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ? N/A
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers. N/A
L Zone* Impact Required
(square feet) Multiplier
Mitieation
3 (2 for Catawba)
1 2 I 1 1.5 I 1
Total I I I
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 12 of 14
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. There is no existing impervious coverage on the
site. The total impervious coverage on the property will be 25,417 sq.ft. which includes all road
driveway and parking surfaces maximum house footprints and covered gazebo footprints This
is 15.1 percent of the total upland area on the parcel.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Each of the lots will have on-site septic treatment systems. Each lot has been configured so that
there is sufficient area for on-site systems to be permitted through the Dare County Health
Department.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 13 of 14
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
y,
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 14 of 14
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT y
Action ID 200411316 County Dare
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner/Agent: Wilma Midgett Property c/o Claude Midgett
Address: 870 Seminole Road
Atlantic Beach, Florida 32233
Telephone No.:
Size and location of property (waterbody, road name/number, town, etc.) 7.91 acre parcel bisected by
the North Drain on the east side of NC12 in Rodanthe Dare County. PIN 065805096827
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
_ There are waters of the U.S. and/or wetlands on the- above described property which we strongly suggest should
be delineated and surveyed. The surveyed wetland lines must be verified by our staff before the Corps will
make a final jurisdictional determination on your property.
Because of the size of your property and our present workload, our identification and delineation of your
wetlands cannot be accomplished in a timely manner. You may wish to obtain a consultant to obtain a more
timely delineation of the wetlands. Once the consultant has flagged a wetland line on the property, Corps staff
will review it, and, if it is accurate, we strongly recommend that you have the line surveyed for final approval
by the Corps. The Corps will not make a final jurisdictional determination on your property without an
approved survey.
X The waters of the U.S. and/or wetlands on your property have been delineated and surveyed, and the limits of
the Corps jurisdiction have been explained to you. Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject
to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in
the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years
from the date of this notification.
X The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area
Management Act (LAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in
Elizabeth City, NC, at [phone] to determine their requirements
Placement of dredged or fill material in waters of the US and/or wetlands on this property without a
Department of the Army permit may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33
USC 1311). A permit is not required for work restricted entirely to existing non-wetland area. If you
have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please
contact William Wescott at 252-975-1616 extension 25.
Basis For Determination: Area meets the three parameters specified in the 1987 USACE Wetland
Delineation Manual, and is adiacent to the North Drain which connects to Pamlico Sound
Property Owner/Authorized Agent Signature
Corps Re-ulatory Official
Date 3-29-2004
Expiration Date 3-29-2009
SURVEY PLAT OR FIELD SKETCH OF THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY AND THE WETLAND
DELINEATION FORM MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM

o
?a r
$

N
t tj.'.
?
1
l
'
t
7:

Li tkc c por E t ttos

k f `?

TAI'

ti ?? ? t
I
4

J?l.. F l 1
Location: 035° 35'20.05" N 075° 28' 8.22" W
Caption: Lightkeeper Estates
23731 NC 12
Rodanthe, Dare County
O
r
B ?
C
T
O
d ?
C)
o z
y
00
z
0
x
0
r
z
a
w
C
NORTH CAROLINA ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM, NCEEP
IN LIEU FEE REQUEST FORM
NOTE: Revised 4/19/06
Print this form, fill in required information, sign and date, and either mail to NCEEP, 1652 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652, or fax to 919-715-2219. Attachments are acceptable for clarification purposes. .
Buffer mitigation applicable only in the Neuse, Tar-Pamlico and Catawba river basins, and the Randleman Lake
Water Supply Watershed.
For help in determining the Cataloging Unit, go to EPA's "Surf Your Watershed" web page:
htto://cfoub eoa gov/surf/locate/index cfm
Direct all questions to Chris Mankoff at 919-716-1921 or [e-mail]
December 5, 2005
Mr. & Mrs. Rudy Gray
Mr. & Mrs. Tim Midgett
POB 37
Rodanthe, North Carolina 27968
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Gray & Mr. & Mrs. Midgett:
Pursuant to your request to access your adjoining oceanfront property through my
campground is not feasible. It's with regret that I have to deny your request.
Sincerely yours,
Jazania O'Neal, Owner
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
Express Permit Review Program
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: Lightkeeper Estates, C/O Trisha Midgett and Bette Gray
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Adjacent the Atlantic Ocean at 23731 NC 12 in Rodanthe in Dare
County, North Carolina
Photo Index - 2000: 174-2055; F-10,G-10,H-10,I-10,11,J-10,11
State Plane Coordinates - X: 3,051,200 Y: 690,400 GPS Rover File: could not obtain
Rodanthe Quad. (upper right corner)
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 05/23/06
Was Applicant Present - No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - 19 June 2006
Office - Washington
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Dare County
Land Classification From LUP - Developed (land), Conservation (water, wetlands)
(B) AEC(s) Involved: Ocean Hazard
(C) Water Dependent: NO
(D) Intended Use: Private
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - None
Planned - Septic tanks and drain fields
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - None
Planned - 2 Houses, asphalt road and gravel driveway, boardwalk, 2
gazebos and beach access steps
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: 9.5 feet
Source - DCM erosion rate map
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION:
[AREA]
DR FDnFD FTT T .FP (1TNRR
(A) Vegetated Wetlands ±19,608 ft2 ±402 ft2
404 wetlands shaded
B Non-Vegetated Wetlands
(C) Other ±53,548 ft2
Highground
(D) Total Area Disturbed: ±1.7 acres (±73,558 sq. ft.)
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: SB Open: No
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to subdivide a property into 5 lots (2 oceanfront and
three street side, construct an asphalt access road, fill 404 wetlands for a gravel driveway and two
home sites, construct an elevated wooden walkway over 404 wetlands, construct two gazebos and a
shared wooden access to the beach.
Quible
Quible & Associates, P.C,
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING
SINCE 1959
June 15, 2006
TRANSMITTAL
RE: Lightkeeper Estates
Express CAMA Major Permitting
To: David Moye, DCM
From: Brian Rubino
Mr. Moye:
PO. Drawer 870
Kitty Hawk, NC 27949
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
PRINCIPALS
Sean C. Boyle, P.E.
Joseph S Lassiter, C.E.P.
Eduardo J. Valdlvieso, P.E.
ASSOCIATES
Joseph J. Anlauf, P.E.
Katherine C. Marchello, P.L.S.
This CAMA Major package addresses comments, concerns and requests for additional information that
we discussed during our May 31, 2006 pre-application meeting for Lightkeeper Estates. Enclosed are 27
copies of the following:
• Project Site Plan
• Project Narrative
• CAMA Major Applications MP-1, MP-2, MP-3, MP-5
• USGS Vicinity Map
• Agent Authorization Letter
• Letters to Adjacent Riparian Owners and certified mail receipts
• Letter from Jazania O'Neal (December 2005) denying access through her campground property
• Notification to NC Dept of Cultural Resources (June 5, 2006)
• NCEEP, in lieu request form for federal compensatory mitigation
• USACE Jurisdictional Determination for Section 404 wetlands
• Property Deed
If you have any questions or if you require any additional information please contact me at
[phone] in the office or mobile at [phone]. Thanks for your attention to this project.
Respectfully Submitted,
Brian Rubino

t
Form DCMMP-1
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
1. APPLICANT
a. Landowner: Co-Applicants
East side of NC 12; 23731 NC 12
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
X Yes No
1. Name Attn: Trisha Midgett and Bette Gray
Address P.O. Box 250
City Hatteras State NC
Zip 27943 Day Phone [phone]
Fax
b. Authorized Agent:
Name Brian Rubino, Ouible & Associates, P.C.
Address PO Drawer 870
City Kitty Hawk State NC
Zip 27949 Day Phone [phone]
Fax
c. Project name (if any)
Lightkeeper Estates
NOTE: Permit will be issued in name of landowner(s), and/or project
name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river, creek,
sound, bay) Atlantic Ocean
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g. building a
home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and excavation and/or
filling activities.
Section 404 wetlands fill for upland lot access and house
footprints, 2 single-family residences with associated
parking and on-site septic systems, beach access walkway
and two gazebos
See proiect narrative for a detailed description
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing project,
new work, or both? New
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial use?
Private
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed project. If
more space is needed, please attach additional pages. See
proiect narrative
4. LAND AND WATER
a. County Dare CHARACTERISTICS
b. City, town, community or landmark
Rodanthe
a. Size of entire tract 6.67 acres
c. Street address or secondary road number
b. Size of individual lot(s) This is currently a single parcel
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP- 1
(6.67 acres total and 6.27 acres as measured from the
FLSNV) which is to be subdivided into 5 residential lots.
Lot 1: 112,581 sq.ft; Lot 2: 84,968 sq.ft.;
Lot 3: 15,317 sg.ft., Lot 4: 15,115 sg.ft.; Lot 5: 15,099 sg.ft.
Note: Area of lots 1 and 2 is measured from the FLSNV
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or NWL
-5' above normal water level
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
e. Vegetation on tract_ grounsel bush, bayberry, wax myrtle,
green briar, juncus spy., Panicum spp., american
beachgrass, sea oats
f. Man-made features now on tract There are currently no
man-made structures on the tract. There is a small
graveyard on the southwest portion of the property. This
will be preserved and maintained and is not included in any
lot area.
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land classification of the
site? (Consult the local land use plan.)
Conservation X Transitional
Developed Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
S-1 Special District
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? X Yes No
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
j. Has a professional archaeological assessment been done for
the tract? Yes X No
If yes, by whom?
k. Is the project located in a National Registered Historic
District or does it involve a National Register listed or
eligible property?
Yes X No
Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes _ No
Coastal (marsh) Other X Section 404
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? Yes
(Attach documentation, if available) A wetland delineation
performed by Quib_le was confirmed by William Wescott.
USACE on March 29_, 2004. See enclosed iurisdictional
determination.
m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
None existing
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters of the
state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary wastewater,
industrial/commercial effluent, "wash down" and residential
discharges.) Minor amounts of surface runoff is possible to
reach Section 404 wetlands.
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
None existing, County water available.
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the following
items must be submitted:
• A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other
instrument under which the applicant claims title to the
affected properties. If the applicant is not claiming to be the
owner of said property, then forward a copy of the deed or
other instrument under which the owner claims title, plus
written permission from the owner to carry out the project.
• An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and
cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black ink on an 8
'/2" by 1 1 " white paper. (Refer to Coastal Resources
Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and only high
quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line prints or other
larger plats are acceptable only if an adequate number of
quality copies are provided by applicant. (Contact the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to guide
agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site. Include
highway or secondary road (SR) numbers, landmarks, and the
like.
• A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent
waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return
receipts as proof that such owners have received a copy of
the application and plats by certified mail. Such
landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in which
to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division
of Coastal Management. Upon signing this form, the
Revised 03/95
PROJECT NARRATIVE- Lightkeeper Estates May 30, 2006, Revised June 13, 2006
Existing Conditions
The subject property is located is located on the east side of NC 12 in Rodanthe, Dare County, North
Carolina. The subject property is an approximately 6.67 acre parcel of property. The applicants/owners
for this Major CAMA application, Trisha Midgett and Bette Gray have owned the parcel since February
2004.
There is a section 404 wetland area in the central portion of the property that encompasses a drainage
ditch that runs in a north to south direction. This wetland area has been determined by NC Division of
Coastal Management (DCM) to not include any jurisdictional "coastal wetlands" The ditch does retain
shallow water during times of normal precipitation, but it is commonly found to become dry. East of the
Section 404 area is a broad upland area that lies within the Ocean Hazard AEC with sandy soils and
herbaceous and estuarine shrub-type vegetation. There is also a low-lying frontal dune that is capable of
migrating, eroding or accreting. However, erosive forces do currently dominate in this area. According
to DCM, the maximum erosion rate is 9.5 ft/yr in this vicinity of beach front. The current FLSNV has
been verified by CAMA LPO from Dare County, Jim Meads on May 4, 2006. This location is
approximately 60 ft landward of the pre- Hurricane Isabel Line that had formerly been established. The
owners have recently (March-April 2006) installed sections of sand fence and have planted american
beachgrass sprigs oceanward of the existing FLSNV. It is the intention of the owners to establish good
vegetative growth along the oceanfront where the former FLSNV was prior to Hurricane Isabel. This
would help protect the existing FLSNV from being pushed further landward.
In the past, the applicants have applied for a CAMA variance and have been formerly denied. The
variance was to request that a residential structure be built on the oceanfront by utilizing NCAC standard
T15A: 07H .0309 Use Standards for Ocean Hazard Areas: Exceptions. Denial was due to the presence of
buildable area on the parcel to the west of the Section 404 area. Therefore, in order to build on the
oceanfront at all, the small structure setback would have to be met, which is 285 ft from the current First
Line of Stable Natural Vegetation (FLSNV).
Proposed Work
As depicted on the accompanying site plan, the applicant proposes to subdivide the 6.67 acre tract into
five single family residential lots. This includes the creation of an access road over an area of existing
jurisdictional wetlands to two oceanfront lots (lots 1 and 2).
Prior to applying for the Nationwide 14 for the access road, requests were made to the adjacent property
(O'Neal Campground) owner to use their property to access the oceanfront lots. The owner, Jazania
O'Neal has provided a letter stating that the use of their property is not feasible (enclosed letter dated
December 5, 2005). To minimize the impacts, the proposed fill on the subject property has been
proposed adjacent to the historically filled O'Neal Campground, linking to existing uplands, as to not
create a separate "land dam". At one point, the applicant discussed with the adjacent owner on the north
side (County of Dare) to be joint applicants, and propose a road on the north property boundary. This
could have provided ocean access to the County and the applicant. However, after further investigation,
the County has an existing Water Quality Protection Easement on their property which limits their ability
I of 2
to permit public crossing. There is a proposed public roadway with a cul-de-sac in the front of the
property, off of NC 12 which does not require any wetlands impacts. The private driveway, which is
proposed as an extension off of the cul-de-sac, is proposed to be backfilled with compacted sandy
material and topped with crushed gravel. Current conditions do not allow for access to the buildable lots
on the east side without construction of this driveway. There are numerous existing structures located on
the east side of this wetland area to the north and south of the subject tract. For the properties to the
north and south, similar proposed access roads have been constructed.
The proposed Section 404 wetland area under jurisdiction of the US Army Corps of Engineers that is
proposed to be filled for the driveway and parking is approximately 641 linear ft (If) and 15,307 sq.ft.
(0.35 ac.). This is proposed under a Nationwide #14 permit from USACE. The travel aisle will be 10 ft
wide (crowned) with vegetated side slopes to be constructed at a 2.5:1 slope (total driveway width
including travel aisle and side slopes is 20 ft). A maximum of 2 ft of sand fill will be necessary to
provide sufficient elevation for the access corridor. There will be no aggregate material placed on the
slopes of the vegetated filter strips.
In order to maintain a surface water hydrologic connection, two (side-by-side) 24 inch diameter culverts
are proposed to be placed in the ditch. The maximum water depth after precipitation events in the ditch
is approximately 0.5 ft (6 inches). Therefore the height of the top of the culvert would be 1.25 ft above
normal water level. The length of the culvert is planned to be 24 ft. The ditch cross-section on the site
plan shows this design.
Also proposed, on future lots land 2, are two residential structures with 2,100 sq.ft. maximum footprints
each, measured from the outer edges of the roof lines. In order to keep these structures entirely outside
the small structure setback, some additional Section 404 wetland fill would be required. The total fill
would be 4,301 sq.ft. (0.10 ac.). This is proposed under a Nationwide #18 permit from USACE.
The total wetlands fill proposed is 0.45 ac. Of this 0.45 acres, 0.35 ac. would fall under a Nationwide
#14 and 0.10 ac. would fall under a Nationwide #18. Of the proposed wetlands fill area, 0.31 ac. are
within the Ocean Hazard AEC. Prior to any land disturbance activity, a silt fence will be installed on
both sides of the fill area. Compensatory mitigation proposed is payment to the NCEEP for freshwater
non-riparian wetlands. A request has been sent to NCEEP for this mitigation. This is proposed at a 2:1
mitigation to impact ratio.
Also proposed, for access to the public beach, is a beach access walkway. The first 67 if of the walkway
will be pile-supported over Section 404 wetlands (See cross-section). The portion of the walkway over
the frontal dune area will also be pile-supported. The majority of this walkway will be on existing sand
grade and will be lined with sand fence. The purpose of this walkway is to direct pedestrian foot traffic
for the subdivision along the same pathway to avoid unnecessary erosion.
Future Work
In the future, lots 3-5 will be sold and developed with single family residences, similar to lots 1 and 2.
These lots are entirely outside of the AEC and will not require CAMA permits. Even though there is no
specific plan for development on these lots, maximum coverages on these lots is referenced in the
NCDWQ, Low-Density Stormwater Management Plan.
2 of 2
Form DCM-MP--1
applicant further certifies that such notice has been provided
Name Jazania H. O'Neal
Address P.O. Box 57, Hatteras, NC 27968
Phone
Name County of Dare Attn: David Clawson
Address P.O. Box 1000, Manteo NC 27954
Phone
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work
on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and
issuing dates.
N/A
• A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources (DEHNR) to
cover the costs of processing the application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and
inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental
Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to 10) If the project involves
the expenditure of public funds or use of public lands, attach
a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act.
& CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION TO
ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application
will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to conditions and restrictions
contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed activity
complies with the State of North Carolina's approved Coastal
Management Program and will be conducted in a manner
consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact, grant
permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies
to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this permit
application and follow-up monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application
is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the I C' day of .tire , 2006.
Print Name Trisha Mid ett Bette Gray
Signatur 64 V.
Landowner or Authorized Agent
Landowner or Authorized Agent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed project.
X DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
X DCM MP-3 Upland Development
DCM MP-4 Structures Information
X DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE: Please sign and date each attachment in the space
provided at the bottom of each form.
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-2
EXCAVATION
AND FILL
(Except bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit,
Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the
Joint Application that relate to this proposed project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or fill
activities. All values to be given in feetverage Final
Existing Prgiect
Access
channel
(MLW) or
(NWL)
Canal
Boat
basin
Boat
ramp
Rock
groin
house
footprint fill
Other
(Access
corridor fill)
Length Width Depth Depth
irreg.
Shape=
4,301 sf
641 ft 20 ft max. 2
typ. ft of fill
1. EXCAVATION N/A
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below MHW or
NWL in cubic yards
b. Type of material to be excavated
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands
(marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAVs) or other
wetlands? -Yes -No
d. Highground excavation in cubic yards
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL
N/A
a. Location of disposal area
b. Dimensions of disposal area
c. Do you claim title to disposal area?
Yes _ No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.
d. Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance?
Yes _ No
_If yes, where?
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?.
Yes No
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water?
Yes No
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION N/A
a. Type of shoreline stabilization
Bulkhead Riprap
b. Length
c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL
d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL
e
f
Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
(Source of information)
Type of bulkhead or riprap material
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below water level
(1) Riprap
(2) Bulkhead backfill
Revised 09/9.9
h. Type of fill material
i. Source of fill material
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. Will fill material be brought to site?
X Yes No
If yes,
(1)
(2)
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? Sand fill areas will be
topped with gravel suitable for vehicle use. Silt fence
will be installed along the perimeter of proposed
disturbed areas before initiation of any fill activity.
b. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)?
Backhoe, dump truck, compaction equipment
c. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to
project site? X Yes No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts. No wetlands other than the
proposed fill area section 404 wetlands will be
disturbed. Two, side-by-side drainage culverts will
be installed in the area of the ditch for adequate
surface water flow. Silt fence will also be installed
for sedimentation and erosion control.
(3)
b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands (marsh),
SAVs or other wetlands?
X Yes _ No
Section 404 Wetlands- This has been determined by
DCM not to be coastal wetlands.
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area Total fill: 0.45 acres;
the roadway will include a 20 ft wide fill
corridor that is 0.35 acres and the residential
footprint fill will total 0.10 acres. This can be
addressed as two separate USACE Nationwide
Permits ( A Nationwide 14 for the road and a
Nationwide 18 for the residential footprint)
(2)
Trisha Midgett and Bette Gray
Applicant or Project Name
A 601'r"
V
Signature
(.((, S l]
Date
Form DCM-MP-2
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-3
UPLAND
DEVELOPMENT
(Construction and/or land disturbing activities)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all other
sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
a.
b
c.
d.
e.
Type and number of buildings, facilities, units or
structures proposed There are 2 residential structures
and 2 gazebos proposed (lot 1 and lot 2). Both house
footprints are 2,100 sa.ft. maximum and both gazebos
are 174 sg.ft.
Number of lots or parcels There are 5 lots total. The
applicant proposes construction on the oceanfront lots
(Lots 1 and 2) onlv at this time. Lots 3 4 and 5 will
be sold separately and built upon by future owners at
a later date. Lots 1 and 2 are within the ocean hazard
AEC and lots 3-5 are entirely outside AEC's.
Density (give the number of residential units and the
units per acre) 0.8 units per acre at build-out
conditions. This is based on a property area of 6.27
acres, including the prosy area landward of the
FLSNV.
Size of area to be graded, filled or disturbed including
roads, ditches, etc. Total land disturbance including
road construction, and construction on lots 1 and 2
including septic areas, parking, residential house
footprint and beach access walkway and gazebos=
52,690 sa.ft. (1.21 ac.)
If the proposed project will disturb more than one acre
of land, the Division of Land Resources must receive
an erosion and sedimentation control plan at least 30
days before land disturbing activity begins. If
applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion control
plan been submitted to the Division of Land
Resources? Yes X No
If yes, date submitted Being submitted along with
CAMA application as an express submittal
f. List the materials (such as marl, paver stone, asphalt,
or concrete) to be used for paved surfaces. Asphalt
and ABC.
g. Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet of
MHW or NWL, or within 575 feet in the case of an
Outstanding Resource Water, to be covered by
impervious and/or built-upon surfaces, such as
pavement, buildings, rooftops, or to be used for
vehicular driveways or parking. N/A
Projects that require a CAMA Major Development
Permit may also require a Stormwater Certification.
Has a site development plan been submitted to the
Division of Environmental Management for review?
Yes X No
If yes, date submitted Low Density Application being
submitted along with CAMA application
1. Describe proposed method of sewage disposal.
On-site individual septic treatment systems
j. Have the facilities described in Item I. above received
state or local approval? Soils are found to be suitable
by Dare County Health Department. An improvement
permit will be applied for.
(Attach appropriate documentation)
k. Describe location and type of proposed discharges to
waters of the state (for example, surface runoff,
sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent,
wash down" and residential discharges).
There will be no discharges to Waters of the State
1. Describe proposed drinking water supply source (e.g.
well, community, public system, etc.)
Dare County Water Distribution System
m. Will water be impounded? Yes X No
If yes, how many acres9
n. If the project is a oceanfront development, when was
the lot(s) platted and recorded? N/A
ApplAant or Project name,
I J11
IS
Date
Revised 03/9.9
Form DCM-MP-5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit,
Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the
Joint Application that relate to this proposed project.
If yes, explain
1. BRIDGES NSA
a. Public Private
b. Type of bridge (construction material)
c. Water body to be crossed by bridge
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or NWL _
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge
(2) Width of existing bridge
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge _
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the
MHW or NWL
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
g. Length of proposed bridge
h. Width of proposed bridge
i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
j. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
Yes No
If yes, explain
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
1. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by reducing or
increasing the existing navigable opening? Yes
_ No
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing no
navigable waters? Yes No
If yes, explain
n. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard concerning their
approval?
Yes No
If yes, please provide record of their action.
2. CULVERTS
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed
unnamed ditch at the northern terminus of the north
drain
b. Number of culverts proposed (2) side-by-side 24" dia.
c. Type of culvert (construction material, style)
corrugated steel or vole
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge
(2) Width of existing bridge
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge _
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the
MHW or NWL
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert (2) side-by-side, 24 ft long
g. Width of proposed culvert (2 ft) 24 in each
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the MHW
or NWL 1.25 ft
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-5
Yes X No
If yes, explain
Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
potential? Yes X No
If yes, explain Non-navigable waters
3. EXCAVATION AND FILL
Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require
any excavation below the MHW or NWL?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Depth of area to be excavated
(4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards
b.
Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require
any excavation within:
Yes X No
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards
Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require
any highground excavation?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards
If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any
excavation, please complete the following: N/A
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
(2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
Yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future
maintenance? Yes No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
Yes No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2) above.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below the
M14W or NWL? Yes _ No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2 above.
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result
in any fill (other than excavated material described in Item
d. above) to be placed below MHW or NWL?
X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled 20 ft
(2) Width of area to be filled 12 ft
(3) Purpose of fill ditch crossing for property access
f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result
in any fill (other than excavated material described in Item
d. above) to be placed within:
X Yes No
- Coastal Wetlands - SAVs X Other Wetlands (404)
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled 640 ft
(2) Width of area to be filled 20 ft along roadwav
(including fill slopes)
(3) Purpose of fill Fill is necessary to provide an upland
access corridor to oceanfront lots (lot 1 and 2) on the
east side of the section 404 wetland area.
Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result
in any fill (other than excavated material described in Item
d. above) to be placed on highground?_ Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
4. GENERAL
Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
X Yes No
If yes, explain in detail proposed compensatory mitigation
by means of payment into the NCWRP/EEP for 0.45 acres
of non-riparian wetlands. Payment to EEP will be for 1 acre
of non-riparian wetlands. This is a 2:1 mitigation to impact
ratio.
b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of any
existing utility lines? Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
c. Will the proposed project require the construction of any
temporary detour structures?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
d. Will the proposed project require any work channels? _
_ Yes X No
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and
erosion controlled? Silt fence will be installed along the
perimeter of the access easement prior to filling. Side
slopes will be vegetated after backfill and compaction is
performed.
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-5
What type of construction equipment will be used (for
example, dragline, backhoe or hydraulic dredge)?
backhoe, dump truck, compaction equipment
Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to
project site? X Yes No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts. No wetlands other than the
proposed fill areas section 404 wetlands will be disturbed
Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require
any shoreline stabilization?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
Trisha Mid ett and Bette Gra
App nt or Project Name
Siglyftur '
J I 0
la l ?
Date -I
Revised 03/95
USPS - Track & Confirm
Page 1 of 1
UNITEDSTATES
i ST13L SERNICEo Home Help
Track & Confirm
Track & Confirm
Search Results
Label/Receipt Number: 7005 1820 0007 8546 3202 -- --- - - -
Status: Delivered Track & Confirm
Your item was delivered at 9:54 am on June 05, 2006 in RODANTHE, Enter Label/Receipt Number.
NC 27968.
( Additional Details > i ( Roturn to t1SPS.com Honse >
Notification Options
Track & Confirm by email
Get current event information or updates for your item sent to you or others by email. t Ga > I
® POSTAL INSPECTORS site map contact us government services jobs National & Premier Accounts
Preserving the Trust Copyright ©1999-2004 USPS. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
--Yttp:Htrkcnfrml.smi.usps.com/PTSIntemetWf-.htl;i*e-.r-- n^uiiAi A^ --- - ---zrr - - - --
USPS - Track & Confirm

Track & Confirm
Search Results
Label/Receipt Number: 7005 1820 0007 8546 3219
Status: Delivered
Your item was delivered at 8:32 am on June 02, 2006 in MANTEO, NC
27954.
AddiflWal DetWs > A44i is UM, cam HMO-;')
Page 1 of 1
Home I Help
Track & Confirm
Track & Confirm -.
Enter Label/Receipt Number.
Notliicatiw options
Track & Confirm by email
Get current event information or updates for your item sent to you or others by email. !ia>
® POSTAL INSPECTORS site map contact us government services jobs National & Premier Accounts
Preserving the Trust Copyright ®1999-2004 USPS. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
http://trkcnfrml.smi.usps.con/PTSIntemetWeb/InterLabelInquiry.do 6/13/2006
02/09/2006 16:04 2529872554 MIDGETT REALTY RODAE PAGE 02
P.O. BOX 114 • ROEIANTHE, NORTH CAROLINA 27968 [phone]
1Ri&PURg&)imW Rodanthe ' u 'vww.midgettrealty.com TELEFAX [phone]
February 9, 2006
Quible & Associates
Attn: Joe Lassiter & Brian Rubino
PO Drawer 870
Kitty Hawk, NC 27959
RE: Gray & Midgett Joining of Property
Dear Joe & Brian,
I, Patricia Midgett, authorize Quible & Associates, P.C. to
act as agent for the purpose of CAMA Major mi i g
for the subject property located at 231731 NC Hwy 1,
Rodanthe, NC.
Thanks,
Patricia Midgett
A I 7m7iS SALES, RENTALS, CONSTRUCTION • OFFICES X F HATTERAS, AVON, RODANTHE
Received 02-09-2006 03:08pm From-2529872554 To-QUIBLE&ASSOCIATES Page 002
CPO DR TUN IfY
December 5, 2005
Mr. & Mrs. Rudy Gray
Mr. & Mrs. Tim Midgett
POB 37
Rodanthe, North Carolina 27968
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Gray & Mr. & Mrs. Midgett:
Pursuant to your request to access your adjoining oceanfront property through my
campground is not feasible. It's with regret that I have to deny your request.
Sincerely yours,
Jazania O'Neal, Owner
Quible
Quible & Associates, P.C.
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING
SINCE 1959
June 1, 2006
David Clawsen
County of Dare
P.O. Box 1000
Manteo, NC 27954
RE: CAMA Major Permitting for Lightkeeper Estates
Rodanthe, Dare County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Clawsen,
P.O. Drawer 870
Kitty Hawk, NC 27949
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
PRINCIPALS
Sean C. Boyle, P.E.
Joseph S. Lassiter, C.E.P.
Eduardo J. Valdlvieso, P.E.
ASSOCIATES
Joseph J. Anlauf, P.E.
Katherine C. Marchello, P.L.S.
As adjacent riparian property owner to the Lightkeeper Estates Property in Rodanthe, Dare County North Carolina,
you are required by NCDENR, Division of Coastal Management to be notified of the proposed development within
the Ocean Hazard Area of Environmental Concern'(AEC) that requires CAMA MAjor Permitting. As depicted on
the accompanying site plan, the applicant proposes to subdivide the 6.67 acre tract into five lots. This includes the
creation of an access road over an area of existing jurisdictional wetlands to two oceanfront lots. Also included is
residential structure construction on Lots 1 and 2, including a beach access walkway and two gazebos.
Should you have no objections to the proposed work, please check the statement below, sign and date the blanks
below the statement and return one copy of this letter to: Brian Rubino, Quible & Associates P.C., PO Drawer 870,
Kitty Hawk, NC 27949 as soon as possible. Keep the second copy for your files.
Should you have objections to this proposal, please send your written comments to Mr. David Moye, NCDCM, 943
Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889. Written comments must be received within 30 days of receipt of
this notice.
Failure to respond in either method within 30 days will be interpreted as no objection.
Sincerely,
Quiible and Associates, P.C.
&-1 (Zle-?
Brian Rubino
I have no objection to the project as presently proposed and hereby waive that right of objection as provided
in General Statute 113-229.
I have objections to the project as presently proposed and have enclosed comments
Signature
Date
Quible
Quible & Associates, P.C. P.O, Drawer 870
Kitty Hawk, NC 27949
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING Phone: [phone]
SINCE 1959 Fax: [phone]
PRINCIPALS
Sean C. Boyle, P.E.
June 1, 2006 Joseph S. Lassiter, C.E.P.
Eduardo J. Valdivleso, P.E.
Jazania H. O'Neal Joseph) Anauf,APE,
P.O. Box 57 Katherine C. Marchello, P.L.S.
Rodanthe, NC 27968
RE: CAMA Major Permitting for Lightkeeper Estates
Rodanthe, Dare County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. O'Neal,
As adjacent riparian property owner to the Lightkeeper Estates Property in Rodanthe, Dare County North Carolina,
you are required by NCDENR, Division of Coastal Management to be notified of the proposed development within
the Ocean Hazard Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) that requires CAMA MAjor Permitting. As depicted on
the accompanying site plan, the applicant proposes to subdivide the 6.67 acre tract into five lots. This includes the
creation of an access road over an area of existing jurisdictional wetlands to two oceanfront lots. Also included is
residential structure construction on Lots 1 and 2, including a beach access walkway and two gazebos.
Should you have no objections to the proposed work, please check the statement below, sign and date the blanks
below the statement and return one copy of this letter to: Brian Rubino, Quible & Associates P.C., PO Drawer 870,
Kitty Hawk, NC 27949 as soon as possible. Keep the second copy for your files.
Should you have objections to this proposal, please send your written comments to Mr. David Moye, NCDCM, 943
Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889. Written comments must be received within 30 days of receipt of
this notice.
Failure to respond in either method within 30 days will be interpreted as no objection.
Sincerely,
Quible and Associates, P.C.
Brian Rubino
I have no objection to the project as presently proposed and hereby waive that right of objection as provided
in General Statute 113-229.
I have objections to the project as presently proposed and have enclosed comments
Signature Date
Quible
Quible & Associates, P.C.
ENGINEERING - ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES - PLANNING • SURVEYING
SINCE 1959
Renee Gledhill-Earley
NC Dept. Of Cultural Resources
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
June 5, 2006
RE: Lightkeeper Estates
Major CAMA Permitting
Rodanthe, Dare County, North Carolina
Ms. Gledhill-Earley:
P.O. Drawer 870
Kitty Hawk, NC 27949
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
PRINCIPALS
Sean C. Boyle, P.E.
Joseph S. Lassiter, C.E.P.
Eduardo J. ValdNleso, P.E.
ASSOCIATES
Joseph J. Anlauf, P.E.
Katherine C. Marchello, P.L.S.
The above referenced project in Rodanthe, Dare County, North Carolina involves a proposed
five-lot subdivision on a currently undeveloped parcel of land. The applicants/owners for this
CAMA Major application, Trisha Midgett and Bette Gray have owned the parcel since February
2004. We are pursuing express permits through NCDENR, including a CAMA Major.
During a May 31, 2006 express permit meeting with the applicable agencies, it was requested
that your office is informed of the proposed work, as required in all projects such as this. There
is a small existing cemetary on the subject property that will be entirely preserved and fenced
(see site plan). There are no other existing improvements on the site. Along with the proposed
site plan, I have included a USGS topographic map sheet with the property location-identified.
Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this site or if you require any additional
information.
Sincerely,
Quible & Associates, P.C.
?? rl_,
Brian Rubino
CC: David Moye, NCDCM
NORTH CAROLINA ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM, NCEEP
IN LIEU FEE REQUEST FORM
NOTE: Revised 4/19/06
Print this form, fill in required information, sign and date, and either mail to NCEEP, 1652 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652, or fax to 919-715-2219. Attachments are acceptable for clarification purposes. .
Name of Applicant or Agent

2. Name of Business of Applicant or Agent
............ ._................. ......._......_...._.._._......__.._....._._........_..._._...._..__.....--.__...................__..._...._................._._........_...._.._.._...._....._-....
Mailing Address (Street or PO Box)
P. o . fax Z5?
4. City, State, Zip

.......... _..--.......... .... _.._-_.__........ _.............
5. Telephone (eg, 919-555-1212) ................. .__........_._....

s Z ?.
- ---
----------?...?_?._.
...... ._..._..._.._..... _............... _.._.__........... _..._.._ .................
6. Fax (optional)

---._._._............ _.__.__.__....._...._..._._._.._._..__._.._.._._---------- .__.... ............... _........ _._ .._--_.._..._............. _..._...... _....... _
-mail (optional)
._.....__...._.---. _-...------- -..-_._._..... --_....-........ ....--.... _........
8. Project Name

Project Location (nearest town, city)
10. Cat-Long Coordinates (optional)

-
11. Project County
............ .-_........ _.......... -.... __-....... ..__.._....... ....._...__.................... ---_ ...... ........._..._..... _-_:.............. ........_.._......................
_._........

- t>cx J- Q_

12. River Basin
--..._.._._....._._._...._...... --._..... ........ ................ ._ ................ ........ ........ __....__.._..__....._......--.._..__._.._._
- -
r?
T GSA-\ v-\V^ ^I<
3. Cataloging Unit (8-digit) ..._..__.._.__....__.... ................ --- - ........__...._...... .....
03ozo? 0_S
14. Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.) (e.g., 0.13)

.
---
--....... .....____-.... _.._..__._....-------------.._-.....---.._...... -_..._..__-...- --..._....---._.._......
-
.
15. Non-Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.) ...._._._. ._._._..---.....-.__._..__.------ ._....__......___
-
a.Li Li
8. -

Coastal Marsh Impact (ac.) _._.... _._ ___ _........__.__....-.._........ ...... -----_..- __......
__

7. Stream Impacts-Cold (ft.) (e.g. 1,234)
------------ --._...... -
8. Stream Impact-Cool (ft.)
......__...._._..... ..__._.._...__....
- t
19. Stream Impact-Warm (ft.)
...._........_.....__.... - --.... ..................
_.___..
IV A,
- =

20. Buffer Impact-Zone 1 (sq. ft.) (e.g. 12,345) __ ... - -... - .._.._..._..._.-........---._.... - - ......---...--_. _... _.. ....... .
-
A/
21. Buffer Impact-Zone 2 (sq. ft.)
Check () below if this request is a: Signature of Applicant or Agent:
- revision to a current acceptance, or
'?
- re-submission of an expired acceptance
Date: S- - 3 O - o
Buffer mitigation applicable only in the Neuse, Tar-Pamlico and Catawba river basins, and the Randleman Lake
Water Supply Watershed.
For help in determining the Cataloging Unit, go to EPA's "Surf Your Watershed" web page:
hfti):I/dpub.ei)a.gov/surf/locate/index.cfm
Direct all questions to Chris Mankoff at 919-716-1921 or [e-mail]
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Q
WILMINGTON DISTRICT C- (OD
Action ID 200411316 County Dare
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner/Agent: Wilma Midgett Property c/o Claude Midgett
Address: 870 Seminole Road
Atlantic Beach, Florida 32233
Telephone No.:
Size and location of property (waterbody, road name/number, town, etc.) 7.91 acre parcel bisected by
the North Drain on the east side of NC12 in Rodanthe, Dare County. PIN 065805096827.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
There are waters of the U.S. and/or wetlands on the-above described property which we strongly suggest should
be delineated and surveyed. The surveyed wetland lines must be verified by our staff before the Corps will
make a final jurisdictional determination on your property.
Because of the size of your property and our present workload, our identification and delineation of your
wetlands cannot be accomplished in a timely manner. You may wish to obtain a consultant to obtain a more
timely delineation of the wetlands. Once the consultant has flagged a wetland line on the property, Corps staff
will review it, and, if it is accurate, we strongly recommend that you have the line surveyed for final approval
by the Corps. The Corps will not make a final jurisdictional determination on your property without an
approved survey.
X The waters of the U.S. and/or wetlands on your property have been delineated and surveyed, and the limits of
the Corps jurisdiction have been explained to you. Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject
to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in
the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years
from the date of this notification.
X The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in
Elizabeth City, NC, at [phone] to determine their requirements
Placement of dredged or fill material in waters of the US and/or wetlands on this property without a
Department of the Army permit may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33
USC 1311). A permit is not required for work restricted entirely to existing non-wetland area. If you
have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please
contact William Wescott at 252-975-1616 extension 25.
Basis For Determination: Area meets the three parameters specified in the 1987 USACE Wetland
Delineation Manual, and is adjacent to the North Drain which connects to Pamlico Sound.
Property Owner/Authorize
Corps Reulatory Official
Date 3-29-2004
Expiration Date 3-29-2009
SURVEY PLAT OR FIELD SKETCH OF THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY AND THE WETLAND
DELINEATION FORM MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM

04/11/2066 11:31
2529672554
MIDGETT REALTY RODAE
PAGE 02
k, 11sa 'aal?: 7a1 pas d ai1?s
?j'•?,4tirw j?e:is:`T.ue Pd, 11110101111- 82
as?ssAS M 011AY, Rgat{tftlt or amts Wt e0, ne
IIN 11111111pU lilt 1111181uIiININit 'e ttls a, ia/ 2"rasa att,,Aa."
APPROVED
DARE COUNTY TAX
COLLECTOR
NO.
lpcoise Tzx- 3 1,800.00
DARE REAL ESTATE
COUNTY rRANSrER TAX
t_T Iy 91- ra - ? $ 9'c°tti
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL. WAliRAAPrY DEED
Parcel Idebti8er No. Verified by County on the day of . 20
By,
-
Maii/Bom to. Oreatee
This inetrurncut was prepared by: Wheless 8c Wheless. PLLC, lots. Virginia Dare Read, Manteo, NC 27954
Brief deaeriptidn for the
T HM DEED made this 24th day of February . 20-2t by and between
Claude Midgett and wife,
Pamela l: Midgett
870 Seminole Road
Atlantic Beach, FL 32233
Bette Gray and husban UE
Trisha Midget and husband,
Timothy W. Midgett
23731 NC :gtghway 12
Rodantho, NC 27968
14. Gray
The designation Chantor and Clrantoe as used heroin .hall inela.le said parties, their heirs, m ooesaoro, and ssalSos, and smell include
singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSET 4, that the Chtmtor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby aoltaowledged, bee
and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey onto the Chaneee in fee simple, all that certain tot arpareel ofland situated in
die City of Rodanthd To-unship. Dare County. North Carolina and atone
particularly described as ibliows:
See attached Exhibit "A"
This is an integral pact of a 1031 Exchange for the C3rantee.
Thu property heseinabove described was acquired by C3rantor by inattumern recorded to Boot page
A nap showing the above described property is recorded in Plat gook page
NC Bar Association Form No, L3 0 1976, Revised m 1977, 2002
Printed by Agreement with the NC Bar Association - 1981 SottPro Corporation, 333 E. Six Forks Rd_, Raleigh, NC 27609
1
Received 04-11-2006 10:36am From-2529672554 To-HUIBLE&ASSOCIATES Page 002
04/11/2006 11:31 2529072554 MIDGETT REALTY RODAE P4GE 03
1 111111 nil 11u 11Ilu11u r??? ?1111u lu1111u in aM1 aoi4 :..ann
TO HAVE AND TO FOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all parlvileges and appurtenances thareto belonging to due Grant" in
foe simple.
And" Grantor covenants with the C3tantee, that C3rantor is seized of the premises to fee simp1% has rite right to convey the aansa in tee
¦hWle, that title is marketable and fkae and clear of all encumbrances, and drat Grantor will Warrant read doemd the title against the
lawful clab- of all penotts whomsoever, other than the following exceptions: 1. Eascmenta and Restriction of Record.
IN WMMSS WHEREOF, the Grantor bas duly exca uted the fomScing na oethe day and year first above,wrtnon.
• r
r _
(dimity Name) C u e 1W gett 2 71y? r ?
Hy: -w4
7Ytle: ' Pamela J. gett .7 4as3 Cf ? Zy
By: _
Tit1s-.
Spate of County of
ter,' -LVS
L the undersigned Notary Publio o the County and State aforesaid, cettif;y anzt Claude Midgctt and Witt, Pamela T.
1vlid&= personally appeared before no this day add acknowledged the due
oxmmttan of the foregoita instrument fbr the purposes therein exprvsacd. Witneas copy hand and Notarial Stan W or seal this 7e--ay
Of li?L-aq .2W Jesen AryensuM
My Conm fission Expires: MY Gorawnasaen oDtasats
a swparaa •kN ter, coos y Public
stn of North Carolina - County of
I, the undersigned Notary Publio ofthe County and State albroesid, txrdty OW personally
carne before we this day and acknowledged that he is the __ of
it North Carolina or corporadion/llmdted liability company/generall pa omahip?ltm{ted parmi ship (Strom 2=uyh the
inapplicable), and that by authority duly given and as the act of such entity, ___he sigmd The fbreioitlg inattuament in ith name on its
bebalfas its act and deed- Witho" my Load and Notarial statap or sesl, this day of . 20_
My Comtnla816n Expires! _
Notary Public
State OfNotth Carolina - County of _
1, the undersigned Notary Public of the Countyand Slate aRwesaid, certify that
tutees ruy hand and Not vial stanW or sea], this day of ^1 20_.
My Comnumsioa Expires: _
Notary Public
certified to be corrvct Tluia St uareat sad this ceriit;eate are duly registered at the date sr t! and m the Book aced Page shown en the
y Register of Deeds far County
'7494w
By Depetyfiksaistum - Am;Vietwr ofDeeds
NC Bar Association Form No. 1-3 ® 1976, Revised 9b 1977, 2002
Printed by Agreement with the NC Bar Association - 1981 SoRPro C.arporatlon,. 33 3 S. Six Forks Rd., Raleigh, NC 27609
Received 04-11-2006 10:36am From-252gB72554 To-QUIBLE&ASSOCIATES Page 003
04/11/2006 11:31 2529072554 MIDGETT REALTY RODAE PAGE 04
. ?l( slits9,i6s
Il?'lll ?'??'1? till III a 111111 No IN Is pliil]10?4 041./PI,
Exhibit "A"
All thoso certain lots or parools of land lying in Rodantk:e, Dare County, North Carolina,
adjoining NC 12, the County of Dare, the Atlantic Oecan, Jazania O'Neal, Bette Gray of al,
Jonna and Robert Midgett, and Lots 1 and 2, Joseph M. Midgett Subdivision, and more
particularly described as follows:
Parcel 1:
Thnse lands designated and being "Eastern Portion" shown on that plat or map entitled,
''Boundary Agreement, Rudolph H. Gray, Bette R. Gray, Timothy W. Midgett & Patricia M.
Midgett," dated March 19, 2004, and prepared by Katherine) C. Marchello, PLS, of Quible &
Associates, P.C., and recorded in Plat Cabinet, Slide Dare Registry.
Parcel 2:
Those lands designated. and being "Western Portion" shown on that plat or map entitled,
"Boundary Agreement, Rudolph H. Gray, Bette R. Gray, Timothy W. Midgett & Patricia M.
Midgett," dated March 19, 2004, and prepared by Katherine C. Mar+chello, PLS, of Quible &.
Associates, P_C., and recorded in Plat Cabinet r , Slide _tt) , Dare Registry.
The combination ofParccls 1 and 2 above arc the sane lands described in Deed Book 1,538, page
26, Durc Registry.
Received 04-11-2006 10:36am From-2529872554 To-QUIBLE&ASSOCIATES Page 004
Name:RODANTHE
Date: 4/27/2006
Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet
7
F�
Location: 035° 35'20.05" N 0751 28'8.22" W
Caption: Lightkeeper Estates
23731 NC 12
Rodanthe, Dare County

I?
I I?
II
t
I
?9 II
II
II
i(
6' WATER h

AIMANE
awFm%w!Y
LAf
N4F
CaNTY OF DARE
DB 490, P6 305
PG C. 5L 16C
® 1
ACaxi
AF1A4 A WTE
0v7m LAYlS
OFG8EYBZr
>n9EFi42p.

M4754 cu4L/rr
-- I?
II
I I
PROTECTIONEA5&6Vr SECTION 404 WETLANDS LINE
DBIE6 CONFIRMED BY W. WESCOTT,
USACE ON 3-29-04 :.
C.M44 OCZ4N94ZARP II I
II
i LAPW 57MVMW WM46K 15717 F fJ
t J • • •
AM
_ ? •
' ' • NA
? I I
J •
•
•
PROPOSED
•
• I I •
_ •
SEPTIC AREA CMW ? •I I , :: •
II
• a
I •
-
•
?MASTEWATER • a • PR0
I I SIDE-BY SIDE
'

L JI
r •
FORCE MAIN AREA 1 1
I • 1 PROPOSED WETLAND FILL4
? NAT fA ARFA• 15AM SO R CUL
/24
J IN DI
AAA •_
I NSF
,b47ANIA Oi-AL
DB 187, P19 555
PL 5,a 44
LOTS / $ 2
EX TENSION
NATIONWIDE #14 , #18 AND 401 WATER QUALITY SITE PLAN
LIGHTKEEPER ESTATES
SHEET 1- OVERALL SITE PLAN
AS RM-
ROOANTHE DARE CO. NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE 1'=100' ? NM 03029 ux 6-13-06
Quibde and Associates, P. C.
BACraBM, PLOMM, MMOA?KMAL SCIB1 US
P.O. MUFRA M. Miff BIVZ N.C. 17948
a
GRAPHIC SCALE
10D 2D0
( IN i?r )
1 inch = 100 &
PILE 5
Avdi "y
404.1
a
H
r
a
x
H
w
n
1
0
n
td
SECTION 404 WETLANDS LINE a
CONFIRMED BY W. WESCOTT, ?sr uc OF STABLE Z
USACE ON 3-29-04 AS PO sME
? \
1
, A6
km, WETLAND
IS AREA. 4,301
•
•
•
• -
TS
MC1rD
IIt7LANl75
aft • 67LNFT
LEGEND
I
r' •
N. ? PROPOSED GAff80
1 `
• O J (174 SO.Ff.) I
PROPOSED PILE-SUPPORTED
664 SLATTED WOOD WALKWAY --,, .
PROPOSED
(2) (174
/ DESIGNATED BEACH ACCESS PAIN
C/L/FJW ON E70STING SAND; ENTIRE PATH LINED
WITH SAND FENCE
51RiGTL1?5E784GK I? Fly
?•? PROPOSED NATIONWIDE i 14 ROAD FILL (15,307 SQ.FT./0.35 AC.)
• a PROPOSED NATIONWIDE / 18 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FILL (4,301 SQ.FT./0.10 AC.)
PROPOSED GRAVEL DRIVEWAY
PROPOSED ASPHALT ROAD
)F PROPOSED SILT FENCE ALIGNMENT DURING GROUND DISTURBANCE ACTIVITY
400 1N@ 199w[9 D
JUL 0 6 2006
DENR - WATER DUALITY
WETIANDSAND STORI WATIR BRANCH
1
1
1
1
I

MiW

NOTES:
1. APPLICANT: TRISHA MIDGETT AND BETTE GRAY
P.O. BOX 250
HATTERAS, NC 27943
2. PROPERTY AREA:
A. TOTAL AREA (LANDWARD OF MHWL): 6.67 AC
B. AREA LANDWARD OF FLSNV: 6.27 AC
C. TOTAL UPLANDS: 3.87 AC
D. TOTAL WETLANDS: 2.80 AC
3. PROPOSED WORK:
A. USING A NATIONWIDE #14: FILL OF 15,307 SF (.35 AC) OF SECTION 404 WETLANDS
FOR UPLAND ACCESS TO PROPOSED OCEANFRONT LOTS 1 AND 2
B. USING A NATIONWIDE #18: FILL OF 4,301 SF (.10 AC) OF SECTION 404 WETLANDS
FOR RESIDENTIAL STUCTURE FOOTPRINTS OUTSIDE OF THE SMALL STRUCTURE SETBACK
(285 FT OR GREATER FROM CURRENT FLSNV)
C. RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION FOR (2) 2,100 SF SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSES
D. ROAD AND DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION AS INDICATED
E. PRIVATE SEPTIC TREATMENT SYSTEMS ON THE WEST SIDE OF LOTS 1 AND 2 FOR THE
RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES ON THE RESPECTIVE LOTS
F. BEACH ACCESS WALKWAY WITH A PILE-SUPPORTED (6 FT WIDE) BOARDWALK
OVER A 67 LF SECTION OF SECTION 404 WETLANDS AND OVER THE DUNE BERM;
OTHER PORTION OF WALKWAY (ON EXISTING GRADE) WILL BE LINED WITH SAND FENCE
TO KEEP PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC IN A DESIGNATED PATHWAY
G. (2) OPEN-SIDED GAZEBOS (174 SF) IN THE LOCATIONS SHOWN (LOT 1 AND LOT 2)
B
Nnimm
SECTION
By
enirma
AL
i
AL
i
AYE E.- -:
AL )C
[. .
'.
AL
AL )c
AL
?`
i ?y?
WASTEWATER FORCE MAI
FLE'SFFCRTH Pt=
P0UO14r0VWPenAVS
B UVARY 2' WATER LINE 4045GtFr • 67LMFL
\ EXTENSION
A l
AL 1
AL O
?A /
SECTION 404 WETLANDS LINE
1 CONFIRMED BY W. WESCOTT,
USACE ON 3-29-04
WATER TIGHT SEPTIC
GRINDER STATION
O
42'
DESIGNATED BEACH
PATH ON EXISTING
PATH LINED WITH S
immi s ue(w5ETa4m 4w Fr.)
RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE FOOTPRINTS: 42'X50' EACH
(DIMENSIONS FROM OUTER EDGE OF ROOFLINE)
BLOW-UP
1 "=50'
CE
A
FINISH GRADE
WOOD PILE
TYR
WALKWAY OVER WETLANDS CROSS-SECTION
r1?n??4%rOF n, s L*v
P. c?
JUL 0 5 2006
OENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BR
DITCH C.&MR LINE
PROPOSED AGGREGATE-,
DRIVE SURFACE
As
1"=5'
DITCH CROSS SECTION A-A'
1"=5'
DRIVE CROSS SECTION B-B'
a
H
r
a
x
H
A
- - 1
- - ?? C
NSF
CaNTY of DARE FROIWTION EA-9V •BVT SECTION 404 WETLANDS LINE
DB 440, R5 305 DB Aw, R' 40 CONFIRMED BY W. yyESCOTL 4 SECTION 404 WETLANDS LINE a
Pr, C. -,U- 16C USACE ON 3-29-04 CONFIRMED BY W. WESCOIT, r>tar UNE OF ?w? x
USACE ON 3-29-04 *IW-TA7WN j%-\
I ? ? ?? LAR6f STI?CTU?SEIB4GK ? fT ?I I I 11
I I 5l11?{1:17E J • • •? a • a • I t
1 • a I 1
I I ?/ 1 • • a • • I la I I • NAT 18 AREA4 J01 SaPL . I \. I PROPOSED GAZEBO 1
I I , • • • I ' \
• J (174 SQ.FT.) I II
III © ® © _JI • PROPOSED • a • a O
SEPTIC AREA A•+f4hlli4IARDAEGL?1i5 I I a .. A6 a? PROPOSED PILE-SUPPORTED j
}I? .. 6' WATER MAIr-TM• SLATTED Wb00 WALKWAY
I I • a •
•
- • PROPOSED
?MASTEWAIER • • I I SIDE-BY15DE • PROPOSED G I
•
• . 'r ?:. (
` , • : FORCE MAIN AREA 1 a 24IN DIT i TS 0 (174 SQ.FT.) 1
• •
I
I I "?. .?• ,' •:• J I II • PROPOSED WEED FILL
• NAT. 14 AREA. 15,307 SQ. •
•••....• .....•..::•....:.°•?•" :::::::::::::.»-.» DESIGNATED BEACH ACCESS PATH /
I I IUD M P? ON E ?DG SAND; ENTIRE PATH LINED
rKUV,wr1tMVs FENCE
POWASCE AWF0 ' AFFftOJO?M1P 2•EXTENSION E 404 •67LNFT STIWIUWSETMCK4WFTJ
Aa
Lff QVIBPLMI5
OF 49*7BZr
roeeFENUV. -AZANIA OWAL BL.__ oW-uP?
- - Db 187, R5 556
- - PL 5,5L 44
L0751 t 2
- - - - LEGEND
4, •i PROPOSED NATIONWIDE # 14 ROAD FILL (15,307 SQ.FT./0.35 AC.)
a
• • • PROPOSED NATIONWDE f 18 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FILL (4,301 SQ.Ff./0.10 AC.)
PROPOSED GRAVEL DRIVEWAY
NATIONWIDE #14 , #18 AND 401 WATER QUALITY SITE PLAN PROPOSED ASPHALT ROAD
UGHTKEEPER ESTATES ?f--3f-X- PROPOSED SILT FENCE ALIGNMENT DURING GROUND DISTURBANCE ACTIVITY
SHEET 1- OVERALL SITE PLAN ; GRAPHIC SCALE
As REr:
RODANTHE DARE CO. NORTH CAROLINA 100 0 50 100 2DO 400
SCALE 1'=100' FLE la 03029 DA-m 6-13-06
Quible and Associates, P.C. ( IN Fr
MCMEM. PIaAn M, ANiBOBrIfMAL SCMWCFS
P.O. DJUWZJI 87'0, M"T BALD N.C. Y7848 1 inch = 100 ft
NOTES:
1. APPLICANT: TRISHA MIDGETT AND BETTE GRAY
P.O. BOX 250
HATTERAS, NC 27943
2. PROPERTY AREA:
A. TOTAL AREA (LANDWARD OF MHWL): 6.67 AC
B. AREA LANDWARD OF FLSNV: 6.27 AC
C. TOTAL UPLANDS: 3.87 AC
D. TOTAL WETLANDS: 2.80 AC
3. PROPOSED WORK:
A. USING A NATIONWIDE #14: FILL OF 15,307 SF (.35 AC) OF SECTION 404 WETLANDS
FOR UPLAND ACCESS TO PROPOSED OCEANFRONT LOTS 1 AND 2
B. USING A NATIONWIDE #18: FILL OF 4,301 SF (.10 AC) OF SECTION 404 WETLANDS
FOR RESIDENTIAL STUCTURE FOOTPRINTS OUTSIDE OF THE SMALL STRUCTURE SETBACK
(285 FT OR GREATER FROM CURRENT FLSNV)
C. RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE CONSTRUCT10N FOR (2) 2,100 SF SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSES
D. ROAD AND DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION AS INDICATED
E. PRIVATE SEPTIC TREATMENT SYSTEMS ON THE WEST SIDE OF LOTS 1 AND 2 FOR THE
RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES ON THE RESPECTIVE LOTS
F. BEACH ACCESS WALKWAY WITH A PILE-SUPPORTED (6 FT WIDE) BOARDWALK
OVER A 67 LF SECTION OF SECTION 404 WETLANDS AND OVER THE DUNE BERM;
OTHER PORTION OF WALKWAY (ON EXISTING GRADE) WILL BE LINED WITH SAND FENCE
TO KEEP PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC IN A DESIGNATED PATHWAY
G. (2) OPEN-SIDED GAZEBOS (174 SF) IN THE LOCATIONS SHOWN (LOT 1 AND LOT 2)
B
NORTH
i
SECTION
Jill AL
AL A ?
/ AL i AL
/AL AL
i` AL ?
f AL CD
7 AL
I A /
AL ?dt?it J SECTION 404 WETLANDS LINE
AL ? CONFIRMED
USACE ?
ON 3-29-04
WATER TIGHT SEPTIC
GRINDER STATION
41
DESIGNATED BEACH ACCESS
PATH ON EXISTING SAND- ENTIRE.
PATH LINED WITH SAND VENCE
tWASTATER FORCE MAI
FILE5lAR17w pva7j
rearm \ r%4Uat4Y0A #*-nAfDS
BC M AR'r 2- WATER LINE 404 SQF1: • 67 LNFT. S%WL STIL 711 SETBACK 4M FTC
EXTENSION
RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE FOOTPRINTS: 42'X50' EACH
(DIMENSIONS FROM OUTER EDGE OF ROOFLINE)
BLOW-UP
1 "=50'
D1rG44 CZN7E t LME
A PROPOSED AGGREGATE As
IRST g?
PROPOSED FINISH GRADE DRIVE SURFACE
-2FT ARnVF FY CIIRFAf F
PILE
TYP.
WALKWAY OVER WETLANDS CROSS-SECTION ?GTaN 4a ?,Ert?vrvs Lee
ry?E?1? To of EAST of TN5 LM+FJ
OF CUL
1"=59
DITCH CROSS SECTION A-A'
5'
5'
B'
SOUTH
199=59
DRIVE CROSS SECTION B-B'
~Q4 CERTIFICATE aArDR OAT OR
THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY YRM
OF THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE GLEAN WATER ACT UNDER THE PRESENT LAW AND REGULATIONS AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE, UNLESS ~ VER5 51A7F5~DE DR OR
PK NAIL AT IN7ER5EGT/ON cwu, Lu WITH ~ THERE IS A CHANGE IN THE LAW OR GUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION LAWA LN 517E I
Q NGGS MOA~NfENT OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED 5 NGGS MOI~MENT "RODAN" NG1/D ;29 YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTILIZING THE 1987 CORPS .a5
°G 144" NGUfl 24 I ELEV~6,77' OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL MIl~SFrT a~EAFl4VE~JGr T SEtHAAW cT
gLEy=5:?8' N 6 4046 7 680 7 F ~ ) E 30,435,4403 F ~ (GONyERS/ON FG'R ~ M1~~ I
TH15 SITE TD ) ~ \ cr ~~cr
NA~/D BB 15 -1,05) ) \ \ N ME ' cr ~taca cr ~
_ 1?E AGM ~Gu~~T~2y ~C c~~ sT ~~PAn1E
- - i ~ FIR r~1E49,$8 Mqy ~ v v TITLE ~
l FtR ~ \ ° ~ \ - 74 E ~ ll ~ \ 1~4L pR k DR
4~~1 l 0) \ DATE I ° w \ EIP i v
{I}~ ~ }11 ~ \ \ oE4NAYf ~h I ~ w ~JW AVE 1 z
h /~h v ~ \ ~iiy3° ~ I - 6 \ Al' N• ~ {,gJ.IDAY FILVD 4Y BLVD 1 1 ~
o~ I ~7 tt' ~ \ " i ~I OIL W a \ ~~m 3Y BLVD
~ I \ b• ~ iK3LlDAY BLVD ~I gl i I
~ ~ \
LI~ ~KM e " ) \ \ F/R A7LANrtG DR a 582 541s E ~ w - ~ ) \ I 7 WnC DR
\ FJP ~ 239.67 L/3 '4~ v v u1 ~ V'1G1N1 TY MAP VICINITY MAP
4.~9~W! - - \ \ ~ ~ ~ tNi~1 cn ~ cow - - 531 °1048'E \ \ ° I ter w ~
1292.33 - _ \ \ 2) 1
!51.71 ~ ~ ~ 1 L4 P ~ 0 rR
F!P N/F p ~ GOUNTY OF DARE F ~ 305 ~ ~ 1 .105EPN M. MIDGETT ~ ~ PG E, 5L 470 GGRr~R DB 490, P6 ~,y~ 1 ~ f
1 S~D/V'IS10N ~ .~SEPH M MIDGETT FfP ~ PG G. 5L 16G PG E, SL 470 >u APPROiI FIRM i `~s 1
LoT2 u151 Nr~~e~r PEDE5lAL5 •~s~rsY Lor r Lox zoNE uNE ~6?~ 1 o' r0 Fcrr sr t
N8!°2124"W _ ~ \ ~ ~ r ~ 1 FI 581 °I4b0"E FGM 4 154 ~ L7 L3 rriFlrr~ - - - - - nFrm 1484.55 \ 1 . - ~ , .3l' Sue ~ •
/ 216 /r2.lr u~ T ,r~o3' h~7•r~ ~1•ds' rEtxro _ - 5tR 3~'+/- ( ~i 33.7 583 26~0`~ Ihd=J
F1P ''''''''-7 5dR ~ ~ \ - - 36 (TfE L ~ 538'ff!Ng / ~ , t' ~4. ~3 YET N!! L I 1 280' hRaM ~l ~ ~ ~ 64,0 `:a ~ ? YET X13 1
cdRr~t \ N aT GARAGE s,o ~ NE1'Jtq ~ ~ 1 I 11 O
ry ~I~~ YE7Y6 x ~'3~ 1 U • WOODED s~rtc t d rer n4o ~ ~7LAND AREA ~ ~ I I ~ g : r~ ~ l rerx~a
~ ~ • ` ~ _ ~ T10N ~ 4 : 121,909 5F rEr xi' L~j ~ ~ I ry ~ N/f a ~ 2 STORY FII'JlJSE EASTERN FY?R ~ I ~ ~ I I
~ ° ~ PG A, 5L 15 2.80 AG , G ~ rFr ~ N I .bNNA d R T hlESTERN PORTION ~ ON BLGGK ~ : ~ m OBSe ~ ~ i. ~s~ ~~m I,~w I ° ~ MIDGET7F ~ PG A, 5L 15 ~ p ~ ~ UPLAND AREA 1 ~ DB i538, PG 2l ~ ; A I a I~w I ~
ry N ° ~V m ~ ~ AREA ?90,.591+~ 5F iq : ; ~j~1 YE7xb UPLAND REA 2 ~ ~ I DB 1405, P6 !74 DB 1538, PG 26 m ~ AREA 101,14?+/- SF AREA 67,534+/- 5F I hi ~ ~ 6.67+/- AG Olic NE7 ~X4
2.32+/- AG ~ 1.55+/- AG ~ 1 54p215F/ 1,24 AG ; ~ AI:PROxrMArE 1 i ~
h OI!(HtL/M(15 ~r ~ ~r~ ~ I 1 ME1FR ~ . G~F GFh~'iFRY ~ ,VIA 1'Er XI L13 L37 (T/F i11~J R 36,4'
i~OD if.l I.0' hlv~D ~ I - - -
TY 1.4 W X7,13' 401.?3' ON6 PROPER FHd:F 510 1 L4 l3 (nFL o ~ N84°45'00°W - ' / >F 5TABLE/
N84 4b 18 W 1.506.9,3' N64 4500 W ~rP ° FIRST LII~ of STABLE ' FIP 171.6!' 232 sl L A vc~frAnoN O2/ra/a4 02//9/04
B ~ EIENT FIP MHW 02 MHH 0WWO4
~ F1:eE HYDRANT p. 0.6o FAST AND ~ N/F BETTS GRAY d AND VALVF ry GW Lfi~ OF GoRA'ER
JAZANIA OPAL LINE TABLE .dONNA ~XJY 09~E,4L GEL1A MARff ~ ~ _ _ D6187, PG 558 LINE LENGTH BEARING
Ll 21,36 N84'45'DO'W DB 321, PG 527 DB 1{46, PG 847 ~ ~ ~ PL 5, SL 44
OVD N ~ - LOT51 d 2 L2 79.82 N10 40 47 E UTILITIES (TYPJ N L3 61.52 N84~45~OO~W
a L4 18,11 N84 45 00 W
p n - _ L5 5.00 S13.15'30'W N` _ _ - - - - L6 5D,00 SBl'14'00'E
~ L7 10180 S87.32'16'E
=~I ~ L8 71,22 S07'05'45'W ` ~ . L9 45.94 N82.54'30'W
LIO 9,41 Nl4'15'33'E yn 'J I
NOTES. IQ ~ L11 84,34 S07 05 20 W 0 ~ 0 L12 5572 N92°26'IB'E EXISTING GONGRETE MONUMENT N I N - -
~ FM° - EX151IN61RON PIPE _ _ - - - - - L13 1932 S70'54'10'E
Q F1R - EXISTING IRON ROD ~ ~ ~y L14 11.24 S33.30'03'E O `~R -EXISTING 1RON ROD L15 63.95 S01'0T4D'W
~ PK - PK NA1L ~ L16 46,52 S03.04'49'E
QMAV -NGGS MONI~lT ~ ~ ~ , L17 2838 SD3.31'06'W
QAM.F-AXLE 01 1~ ry L18 28,35 S83'D2'42`W 2 ~ ~ ~ p ~ . QIRaV ANGLE IRON ry ry ~ ;fry L19 52,06 SO 45 57 E
~-o., - ur1LITY POLE ° I m w m p ~ p ~ L20 5,44 S54' 'Ots'W
-FIRE HYDRANT NI L21 f0,33 S54°16'06'W
_ f1lATER '/ACNE I - - - L22 3 95 S05'IS'00`W ~i - GALGULATED POINT _ - - - - L23 48,99 S68'33'43'W
4 rtT -WETLAND FLAG ~ FIP L24 21,64 S48.53'16'W 584°55'~?2"E L25 34,45 S51+39'49'E
~4. - .5EGT10N 404 hET1.AND AREA 60.73 L26 28,52 S69'44'2TE
(7fE LINFJ - TOTAL AREA ~ 344,61?+/- 5F= 7.41+/- AG L27 3610 S66'06'55'W
BY COORDINATE METHOD TO MHW L28 4Lt5 S14'21'24'E - REFERENGEDB 1538, PG?6 L29 54,02 N68'35'04'W
AND PG A, SL 15 L30 51,84 S25`0T35'W
- SUR~EYDATE50?A9 d 20/04. L31 32,67 S4'47`49'W - H~IZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES L32 43,90 N58'22'il'W
ARE 5H0{19J (US SURVEY FEET) L33 61,64 N53'46'01'W
- FIRM ZONES AE (9J AND AE (10) L34 38,39 S02'29'32'W PALL 375348 0630E L35 20,72 S02.29'32`W
- h~?IDIAN BASED ON A-B L36 221,63 S88'46'59'E
L37 399,75 S84'ii'29'E
L38 510,64 SB4`45'00`E L39 497.71 N84.14'Ol'W
CCNUMISSION N0.
03029 COPYRIGHT O 2004 •
GRAPHIC SCALE DESIGNED 8Y QUIBLE ANO ASSOCIATES, INC. S1NCf 1959 BR ul ~ ® SINCE 1959
00 0 50 100 2D0 400 DRAWN BY TENS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF
BR QUIBLE Ai;:D ASSOCUTES, INC., ALL & SSOClat®C V JJIIL~~ l3. GRAY ~ETTE R. 4,T~~ ~ RIGHTS ARE RESERVED. ANY RE- V?7! ates! P. C.
CHECKED 8Y > > PRODUCTION OF THIS OR POSSESSION BR WnHOUT PR~oR PERMISSION of ENGINEERING * CONSULTING * PLAN ~ ~ OUIBLE ANO AssoG~.TES, iric. Wlu ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES * SURVE' SULTING * PLANNING
CAD FlLE CONSTITUTE NOLATION OF COPYRIGHT ENCES * SURVEYING
1 inch =loo it, o3o2s-wET TIN,!'OTHY W MIDGETT ~ PATRICIA MIL>GETT SAWS. VIDIAT,DN WILL BE SUBJECT ISSUE DATE TO LEGAL ACTION
0303/04 ItINEKEET TOWNSHIP DARE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA Phone: (252) ZBi-3300 Fax: {252) ss1 CERTIFICATIQN E-MaR: qulble0•arthl(nk,net Fax: [phone] sOsarthllnk.net
r

V Oh7'DR
v MYRNA ~ • Z O _N
SEEDING DATES: APRIL 1- SEPT 30 SEE - ~5 `..1A2F51DFDR Z fii DR I ~ Z } I ZW
DING DATES: OCT, 1 MARCH 31 1. SOIL EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL SEED MIXTURE PLAN NOTES; APPLICATION RATES/ACRE SEED MIXNRE APPLICATION RATES/ACRE a.) AREA TO BE DISTURBED IS 52,690 SQ.FT. X1.21 ACRES LRGR,4 LN ~ • J ~ N
BAHIA 1. ROADWAY DR ( } 50 LBS. ~ GRAIN / NEWAY/PARKING: 41,028 SQ.FT. NorES: 5„~ ~ ~ p~ a ~ N .KIS U * to ~ ~
i75 LBS. 2. RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION AREA (LOTS 1 AND 2): 5,643 SQ.FT. COMMON BERMUDA 5D LBS. 3. SEPTIC TREATMENT AREA (LOTS 1 AND 2 : 3 200 MfL15BTT 564NAVEN G7 1. APPLICANT: TRISHA MIDGETT AND BE ? TTE GRAY ~ y w ? N or
(UNHULLED} SQ.FT, 4. BEACH WALKWAY AND GAZEBOS: 2,819 SQ.FT~ P.O. BOX 250 M ~ y J ~ ~ t
GERMAN MILIETT 15 LgS 10-10-10 A 1000 LB/ACRE b.) ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED WITHIN FIFTEEN HATTERA ~ ° S, NC 27943 '`~i~cr ~ ~ Z o
FESCUE 20 ~ DAYS OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVfTIES. IF SAID ACTIVITIES OCCUR OUTSIDE 2. AREA ~ ' ~ N w ° OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN: q ~ ~ ~ z ~ a THE OCEAN HAZARD AEC APPP ~ ~'4 cr ° ~ o LIES WITH MAXIMUM ANNUAL ~iEp I ~ „ P
THE PERMANENT VEGETATION SEEDING DATES (APR. 1- SEP.30)THEN TEMP- F~ILIZE6 ORARY VEGETATION SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE FOLLOWED FOR EROSION RATES (9.5 FT/YR) AS PER NC DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT h * a
26-13-13 0 50o LB/ACRE /ACRE STRAW. ANCHOR STRAW BY TACKING WfTH ASPHALT PLANTING UNTIL THE NEXT APPROPRIATE PERMANENT SEEDING PERIOD, AT APPLY 4,000 lB WHICH TIME PERMANENT VEGETATION S 3. PROPERTY AREA: ~ ~ ~ • ~ c~ z N
NEii1NG, OR A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL A DISK WffH BLADES SET NEARLY HALL BE ESTABLISHED ACCORDING TO STRAIGHT CAN BE USED AS A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL PERMANENT VEGETATION SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS (SEE PERM. & TEMP. SEEDING MULCB SPEC'S THIS SHEET}. U] Z w t Q W A. TOTAL AREA (LANDWARD OF MHWL): 6.67 AC , W ~ ~ N
APPLY 4,000 LB/ACRE STRAW. ANCHOR STRAW BY TACKING WITH ASPHALT, c.) IF EXCESSIVE WIND EROSION OR STOR B. AREA LANDWARD OF FLSNV: fi.27 AC 1p~LDR w Z w0 C. TOTAL UPLANDS: 3.87 AC ~ ~ ? ~
NETTING, OR A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL A DISK WffH BLADES SE7 NEARLY MWATER RUNOFF EROSION DEVELOPS DURING TiME OF STTtNGHi CAN BE USED AS A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL CONSTRUCTION ANY LOCATION ON THE PROJECT SITE, ADDITIONAL SILT FENCING SHALL 0 TIME OF D, TOTAL WETLANDS: 2.80 AC z z z o
BE INSTALLED AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER SO AS TO PREVENT DAMAGE TO ADJACENT 1 E. LOT BREAKDOWN: w w a
PROPERTY. SEE SILT FENCE DETAIL THIS SHEET. d.) SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROLS TO BE INSPECTED, TOTAL AREA hbLIDAYBLVD I ~
MAINTAINED AND REPAIRED AS NECESSARY UNTIL PERMANENT CONTROLS GENERAL: ARE ESTABLISHED. (BASED ON AREA LANDWARD faLronraL,ro LOT # OF FLSNV FOR LOTS 1 AND 2 UPLANDS WE
- FERTILIZER RATES SHOWN ARE GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS; FREQUENCY AND AMOUNT OF FERTILIZATION CAN BEST BE DETERMINED THROUGH S e.) CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE: - MAINTENANCE: RE SPECIFlC SOIL TESTING. 1 OBT TLANDS
SATISFACTORY STABWZATION AND EROSION CONTROL REQUIRES A COMPLETE VEGETATIVE COVER. EVEN SMALL BREACHES IN VEGETATNE COVER CAN AIN PLAN APPROVAL AND OTHER APPLICABLE PERMITS. LOT 1 112,581 SQ.FT. 38,986 SQ.FT. 73 595 S .FT. Q a z
IF LEFT UNATTENDED, CAN ALLOW SERIOUS SOIL LOSS FROM AN OTHERWISE STABLE SURFACE. A SINGLE HEAVY RAIN IS OFTEN SUFFICIENT TO GR EXPAND RAPIDLY AND, 2 FLAG AND/OR ROUGH STAKE WORK LIMITS. SPOTS, AND THE LONGER REPAIRS ARE DELAYED, THE MORE COSTLY THEY BECOME. PROMPT ACTION WILL KEEP SEDIMENT LOSS AND REPAIR COST TLY ENLARGE BARE 3 HOLD PRECONSTRUCIION CONFERENCE (OWNER, CONTRACTOR ENGINE LOT 2 84,968 SQ.FT. 36,655 SQ.FT. 48,313 SQ.FT. ~GD'~ I o
SEEDLINGS SHOULD BE INSPECTED FREQUENTLY AND MAINTENANCE PERFORMED AS NEEDED. IF RIL1S AND GUWES DEVELOP, THEY MUST BE Fl DOWN. NEW AND APPROPRIATE GOVERNMENT OFFlCIALS AT ER, AND MULCHED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. DIVERSIONS MAY BE NEEDED UNi1L NEW PLANTS TAKE HOLD. LLED IN, RE-SEEDED, ) LEAST ONE WEEK PRIOR TO START LOT 3 15,317 SQ.FT. 15,317 SQ.FT. N A l~IGINI Q / 7Y MAP
OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS EXTEN 4) INSTALL SILT FENCING tT LOT 4 15,115 SQ.FT. 15,115 SQ.FT. N A v / _w
D BEYOND THE SEEDING PHASE. cuNnL FlNAL coMPLEnoN Is awARDED ®LOCATIONS SHOWN ON PLAN WEAK OR DAMAGED SPOTS MUST BE REIJMED, FERTIUZED, MULCHED, AND RESEEDED AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE. REFERTIUZATION MAY BE NEEDED ~ 5) CONSTRUCT PROJECT AS PROPOSED PRODUCTIVE STANDS. TO MAINTAIN 6 A LOT 5 15,099 SQ.FT. 15,099 SQ.FT, N A ~ / ~
LL EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PRACTICES WILL BE INSPECTED WEEKLY w F. PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY: 29,824 SQ.FT. U f
AND AFTER HEAVY RAINFALL EVENTS. NEEDED REPAIRS WILL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. 3. PROPOSED WORK:
PROVIDE A GROUND COVER ON EXPOSED SLOPE WITHIN 15 WORKING DAYS OR 30 CAIENDA A. USING A NATIONWIDE #14: FILL OF 15,307 SF (.35 AC) OF SECTION 404 WETLANDS
R DAYS (WHICHEVER IS SHORTER). FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF ANY PHASE OF GRADING AND A PERMANENT GROUND COVER F FOR UPLAND ACCESS TO PROPOSED OCEANFRONT LOTS 1 AND 2
OR ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN 15 WORKING DAYS OR 90 CALENDAR DAYS (WHICHEVER IS SHORTER FOLLOWING COMP B. USING A NATIONWIDE #18: FILL OF 4,301 SF (.10 AC) OF SECTION 404 WETLANDS ~ °
DEVELOPMENT. LETICN OF CONSTRUCTION OR FOR RESIDENTIAL S ~~~NO3~W TUCTURE FOOTPRINTS OUTSIDE OF THE SMALL STRUCTURE SETBACK ~ W~ NZ.>~ (285 FT OR GREATER FROM CURRENT FLSNV) o a oaQO~ao~
C. RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION FOR 2 2,100 SF SINGLE-F N ~ . a~ •vWZ
AMILY HOUSES ~ aW°~~ D. RO < wa owk~1Om~ AD AND DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION AS INDICATED O~ ~~~~,a~o~<
E. PRIVATE SEPTIC TREATMENT SYSTEMS ON THE WEST SIDE OF LOTS 1 AND = " '~N~~o~SZ~
RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES ON 2 FOR THE Z~ o~~oF J THE RESPECTIVE LOTS > ~ ~°W a°s3o
F. BEACH ACCESS WALKWAY WITH APILE-SUPPORTED 6 FT WIDE ° ~ '~~°'~H°s~ ( )BOARDWALK v m gW~~o R
OVER A 67 LF SECTION OF SECTION 404 WETLANDS AND OVER THE DUNE BERM• 'a °m~o~mN OTHER PORTION OF WALKWAY ON EXISTI "-'o~o3°ZS
( NG GRADE) WILL BE LINED WITH SAND FENCE ~ a o0 TO KEEP PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC IN A DESIGNATED PATHWAY
G. (2) OPEN-SIDED GAZEBOS (174 SF) IN THE LOCATIONS SHOWN LOT 1 AND
( LOT 2)
z 3
p w ~ >
II ~ w w ~
_ II ~ w
- _ ` z ~ _ _ a
NdAiHt cxtv.nr GGTINIY OF D,4RE PRO>FGnoN 6A5e•8Jr I , ~ Z z l o_ a o
D8 490, P6 305 DB 119, A5 448 SECTION 404 WETLANDS LINE PG G. 5L 16G CONFIRMED BY W. WESCOTT, SECTION 404 WETLANDS UNE Iw- ~ N >
F>=!)[5r'4L ~ USACE ON 3-29-04 III FlRST UNE OF STABLE ' Z Z W yy~,~ CONFIRMED BY W. WESCOTT, \ O p ~ U USACE ON 3-29-04 VEGETATION 5/04/06
p~ 4 ~ G4MA ~ ~ ~ ~ L~FAhI ~I I AS PER JM LIEADS, LPO~ 1 r Z ~ ~ .
_ ~ ~ ~4 LeEAhI fb17aRD1 LAR6E5T~TU~ SPt&IGx (37o FrJ 'fl&ICK (~70 FTJ 11 O w w ~ 0=
II r _ - ~ i • ~ • AREA 2 • • O Z J
~ a III ~I 1/ ? t 1. PROPERTY AREA: PR SED • • ~ ! ~ 7i Uwl O a OPO WETLAND FlLL I I ~ - Z • • I I • NAT, 16 AREA: 4,301 SOFT. • ~ r 1 I F- p
o ~ A. TOTAL AREA (LANDWARD OF MHWL). 6.67 AC ~ ~ © X U ~ • ~ PROPOSED GAZEBO 1 ~ w -
® © • B. AREA LANDWARD OF FLSNV: 6.27 AC . _ ~ PROPOSED ~ I I 6" WATER MAIN SEPTIC AREA : • x 1 ~ (na so.Fr.) I n o cn o II ~ • ~ I o l o
C. TOTAL UPLANDS: 3.87 AC GGEAN?dA7~VQDAHGLIM/T5 i I 605 fT 5F1&4r'.K D. TOTAL WETLANDS: 2.80 AC ~ • / p - I AEG LIM/T5 . • ` . • SLATTED wWD ~U(WAY I a x a r ~raarx I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~
~ i 2. PROPOSED PROJECT IMPERVIOUS AREA 26,354 SQ.FT. (INCLUDES 937 SQ.FT. OFF-SI ~ " • • • • O
3. ALLOWABLE BUILT UPON AREA P ' ~ • ° : . ; . ( , ASTEwATER ~ ` , ER LOT: 4,185 SQ.FT. (FORM SWU-104) ~ 1. ~ oRCE MAIN AREa 1 10 1 0 0 PROP6SED * I pl F ` • I ~ SIDE-BY~SIDE r ~ I c0
4. LOT BUILT UPON AREA MAXIMUM FOR DEVE LOPMENT 25~ i l • ' ~ ~ .~I PROPOSED WETLAND FlLL • 24" CULVERTS ~ PROPOSED GA I n N ~ ~ a WETLAND FlLL IN DITCH O 174 0 1~ I I I ~ • a • ( SOFT.) / ~ ~ cp
' . ~ ~ • • NAT. 14 AREA: 15,307 SQ.Fi. TAL AREA I~ !EA: 15,307 SOFT. ( • ~ _ _ ~ 7
BASED ON AREA LANDWARD BUA i i ' • ' LOT # OF FLSNV FOR LOTS 1 AND 2 UPLANDS wa~v rarer ~ ~ N M O
(BASED ON UPLANDS) ~ "~Di~ A~ROXlM4TE 2" WATER LINE LOT 1 112,581 SQ.FT. 38,986 SQ.FT. 9,747 SQ.FT. EXTENSION DE5GNAIED BEACH ACCESS PATH ~ Z ON EXISTING SAND; ENURE PATH LINED 'ATER UNE N61LAtiWY ilE7GMp5 ' MA1H SAND FENCE
GVi6' LMi15 TEN *04 SGtIT. 167 ~t'(K6W FMFZ/Jm SION LHf-T. SM,ML STI~A:1lRf SE784GK (?d5 Ffl
LOT 2 84,968 SQ.FT. 36,655 SQ.FT. 9,164 SQ.FT. ~'r °f~'~ hAil^! a
LOT 3 ,qNp yp~~ roae N/P 15,317 SQ.FT. 15,317 SQ.FT. 3,829 SQ.FT. JaZAN1A 01~A1. DB 187, PG 558 Z BLOW-UP J G:
LOT 4 15,115 SQ.FT. 15,115 SQ.FT. 3,779 SQ.FT. PL 5 5L 44
LOT 5 15,099 SQ.FT. °D LOTS I d 2 15,099 SQ.FT. 3,775 SQ.FT. uTUmES nrn~ U W a
5. DRIVEWAY TO HAVE A 10 FT WIDE TRAVE ~ V =
FILTER STRIPS 0 L AISLE WITH 5 FT VEGETATED N EACH SIDE _ _ ~ O
LEGEN D
r • ~ • PROPOSED NATIONWIDE ~ 14 ROAD FlLL (15,307 SOFT./0.35 AC.)
•
• • W
PROPOSED NAlI0NW1DE iP 16 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FlLL (4,301 SOFT,/0.10 AC.) ~ • •
olrcM cea~r urn
PROPOSED GRAVEL DRIVEWAY ~ Iy
" ' " ' PROPOSED ASPHALT ROAD
A B PROPOSED AGGREGATE A' NORTH B WETLAND VEGETATION SUBSTRATE SURFACE SST PROPOSED FlNISH GRADE DRIVE SURFACE SST 5' 5' SOUTH B' ~
i- 10 _I VEGETATED 10' GRAVEL SURFACE VEGETATED I ~2FT ABOVE EX. SURFACE ! FlLTER STRIP o~AL GAMP6RGTA, w SUU1'H PROPOSED SILT FENCE ALIGNMENT DURING GROUND DISTURBANCE ACTIVITI' ~ ~
v., . ,.w;. , • ~a_ , . _ xY •,Ty.+, CROWNED FlLTER STRIP PKOi'ER7YBC.TJND,4i I a a 11~AL GAMP6R~ 1~- WATER MAIN (SDR 21 CL 200) r ~ O ZOPER7YBC.rJJNDARY =GATE vaLVE ~ tt ~
, : , 2' ~ i ~,1' SECTION 4 TLAND , BLOW OFF ~ I ~ A 1
d 1~ d ~ .1 , d d ~ J~ ~ ~YL.- . d~ d, , ~ ~ HYDRANT ~ Y/ WATER SERMCE ~ I
? - ? r .WATER LINES + - 1 FT UNDERCUT AND BACKFlLL PRIOR TO ROAD CONSTRliCT10N il~c ilVc d.1
2) 24" DIA METAL PIPE ~ r ~ aNDU raNN
SAND BASE . ~Ik ill4 N'~ 1 bA
~cnoA~ 404 rErt•aAVS c.rr~ RIP-RAP FOR STABILIZATION W NDS ro r+~ sasr of rtas Lrf>~J OOD PILE (BOTH 51DES OF CULVERT) OUTSIDE E1K£ OF ROOFUNE illy X . , , i~ ° ~
TYP. rw ~j
~PALKIYAY OVER WETLANDS CROSS-SECTION 1 ~~=5 ~ 1 ' 5 DITCH CROSS SECTION A-A' DRIVE CROSS SECT ' ~ ~ ~ vl ~ v SECTI N ~~Fh~ 0 404 WETLANDS LINE, V X ` ~L
ION B-B CONFIRMED BY W. WESCOTT, . ~ il~ o_ .~dk,'; 1 USACE ON 3-29-04
- 2 ~ ~ ~
SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRIC(TYP) ~ ~A ~P X ~ •`f~ WATER TIGHT SEPTIC Z N~ ~ " I GRINDER STP,110N 30
ilh. ~ W I-
6 M x 2 42' w
SPgCI ~ ~ w ~ DESIGNATED BEACH ACCESS r Y
Nr; WAS1>~TER FORCE MAI • • PATH ON EXISTING SAND• ENURE IiLI w ~pG£ PATH LINED WITH SAND FENCE Z , -
35 Y J
OWi"
PEN PEN i 8' ~ HM1D RuL ~ ~aeTe~
~ ~ FLOW/ ~ ao,ne ure hIALKNf~1Y0YBZhETL,tiF~ COMMISSION N0. 2' WATER UNE 9P4 5Qtf. 0 671NFf.
1, i , 0 ~,5 EXTENSION ~e~' ~T~acK (2d5 Fr.1 0302 9
LOwl ~ E~c~s+~PC~ a~5 DESIGNED BY r~ frdOST~.c#• RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE FOOTPRINTS: 42'X50 EAC EJV BDR
i / w ~i ~ ; I b ~,o H 8' ~ (DIMENSIONS FROM OUTER EDGE OF ROOFLINE)
\ 1 N DRAWN BY WOOD PIUNC TMp
\ ~l. _ 11 EJV BDR CHECKED BY
----r-- N P BLOW-~ - - - " '
=50 ISSUE DATE
COMPACTED FILL TRENCH ( 4" WIDE x 8" DEEP ) 2-9-06
SILT FENCE DETAIL
TYPICAL SECTION OF _ N.T.s S HEET N0. GRAPHIC SCALE
CovFRFn ra~i~Rn
100 0 50 100 200
PROVIDE A GROUND COVER ON EXPOSED SLOPE WITHIN 15 WORKING DAYS OR 30 CALENDAR goo TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION FOR THE
FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF ANY PHASE OF GRADING AND A PERMANENT GROUND COVER FOR ALL DAYS DISTURBED (WHICHEVER E SHORTER). WITHIN 15 WORKING DAYS OR 90 CALENDAR DAYS AREAS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES
DEVELOPME (WHICHEVER IS SHORTER FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION OR DRAWING FILE: ??????.DWG NT. ( IN FEET )
PLOT SCALE: I inch = 100 ft.
OF 1 SHEETS