20060981 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20060616

IN REPLY REFER TO
Regulatory Division
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Washington Regulatory Field Office
P.O. Box 1000
Washington, North Carolina 27889-1000
July 24, 2006
Pa)(V zC,C)GC) 1?l
Action ID No. SAW-2006-154248-158 / Nationwide Permit No. 27 (Wetland Restoration)
Mr. Scott Gates
Albemarle Restorations
P.O. Box 204
Gatesville, North Carolina 27938
Dear Mr. Gates:
This correspondence confirms our receipt of your preconstruction notification dated June 13,
2006, requesting Department of the Army (DA) authorization to implement the restoration plan
entitled, Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation, Martin County, North Carolina. This
work will be undertaken on a 40-acre site located off NCSR 1562 (Poplar Chapel Road) between
NCSR 1552 (Jerden Thicket Road) and NCSR 1561 (Elijah Lee Road), southeast the town of
Jamesville, adjacent to Cooper Swamp, in Martin County, North Carolina.
Accordingly, for the purposes of the Corps of Engineers' Regulatory Program, the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, lists nationwide
permits. Authorization, pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act, was provided for activities in waters of the United States associated with
the restoration of former waters, the enhancement of degraded tidal and non-tidal wetlands and
riparian areas, the creation of tidal and non-tidal wetlands and riparian areas and the restoration
and enhancement of non-tidal streams and non-tidal open water areas on private lands.
Your work is authorized by this nationwide permit provided it is accomplished in strict
accordance with the attached General Conditions and the following Special Conditions:
a. This authorization in no way obligates the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to recognize this
work as a stream or riparian wetland restoration project,
b. This authorization in no way obligates the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to accept this
project for use as compensatory mitigation proposed by the North Carolina Ecosystem
Enhancement Program (NCEEP), or any other person, program, or entity.
This verification is valid until the NWP is modified, reissued, or revoked. All of the existing
NWPs are scheduled to be modified, reissued, or revoked prior to March 18, 2007. It is
incumbent upon you to remain informed of Chan es to the NWPs, We will issue a public notice
C ?L0W [9
D
,JUL 2 7 2006
t , l?_R QUALITY
WETLA4D?'ANU 5'1C0AJ N9TF.R ?24NCH
when the NWPs are reissued. Furthermore, if you commence or are under contract to commence
this activity before the date that the relevant nationwide permit is modified or revoked, you will
have twelve (12) months from the date of the modification or revocation of the NWP to complete
the activity under the present terms and conditions of this nationwide permit.
You should contact Ms. Cyndi Karoly, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, telephone
[phone], regarding Section 401 Water Quality Certification. This nationwide permit does
not relieve you of the responsibility to obtain other required State or local approval.
Thank you for your time and cooperation. Questions or comments may be addressed to me at
the Washington Regulatory Field Office, telephone [phone], extension 26.
Sincerely,
/o.- &A,
William . Biddlecome
Regulatory Project Manager
Enclosure
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. Ronald J. Mikulak, Chief
Wetlands Regulatory Section
Water Management Division
United States Environmental Protection Agency
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Mr. Pete Benjamin
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. Ron Sechler
National Marine Fisheries Service
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516

Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Mr. Scott McGill
Ecotone, Inc.
P.O. Box 5
Jarrettsville, Maryland 21084
Mr. Guy C. Pearce
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
-$' a.YF O(D - 001 9 1
IN REPLY REFER TO
Regulatory Division
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Washington Regulatory Field Office
P.O. Box 1000
Washington, North Carolina 27889-1000
July 24, 2006
Action ID No. SAW-2006-154248-158 / Nationwide Permit No. 27 (Wetland Restoration)
Mr. Scott Gates
Albemarle Restorations JUL 2 5 2006
P.O. Box 204
Gatesville, North Carolina 27938
Dear Mr. Gates:
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STQRMWATER BRANCH
This correspondence confirms our receipt of your preconstruction notification dated June 13,
2006, requesting Department of the Army (DA) authorization to implement the restoration plan
entitled, Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation, Martin County, North Carolina. This
work will be undertaken on a 40-acre site located off NCSR 1562 (Poplar Chapel Road) between
NCSR 1552 (Jerden "Thicket Road) and NCSR 1561 (Elijah Lee Road), southeast the town of
Jmesville, adjacent to Cooper Swamp, in Martin County, North Carolina.
Accordingly, for the purposes of the Corps of Engineers' Regulatory Program, the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, lists nationwide
permits. Authorization, pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act, was provided for activities in waters of the United States associated with
the restoration of former waters, the enhancement of degraded tidal and non-tidal wetlands and
riparian areas, the creation of tidal and non-tidal wetlands and riparian areas and the restoration
and enhancement of non-tidal streams and non-tidal open water areas on private lands.
Your work is authorized by this nationwide permit provided it is accomplished in strict
accordance with the attached General Conditions and the following Special Conditions:
a. This authorization in no way obligates the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to recognize this
work as a stream or riparian wetland restoration project.
b. This authorization in no way obligates the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to accept this
project for use as compensatory mitigation proposed by the North Carolina Ecosystem
Enhancement Program (NCEEP), or any other person, program, or entity. .
This verification is valid until the NWP is modified, reissued, or revoked. All of the existing
NWPs are scheduled to be modified, reissued, or revoked prior to March 18, 2007. It is
incumbent upon you to remain informed of changes to the NWPs, We will issue a public notice
.k
when the NWPs are reissued. Furthermore, if you commence or are under contract to commence
this activity before the date that the relevant nationwide permit is modified or revoked, you will
have twelve (12) months from the date of the modification or revocation of the NWP to complete
the activity under the present terms and conditions of this nationwide permit.
You should contact Ms. Cyndi Karoly, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, telephone
[phone], regarding Section 401 Water Quality Certification. This nationwide permit does
not relieve you of the responsibility to obtain other required State or local approval.
Thank you for your time and cooperation. Questions or comments may be addressed to me at
the Washington Regulatory Field Office, telephone [phone], extension 26.
Sincerely,
William . Biddlecome
Regulatory Project Manager
Enclosure
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. Ronald J. Mikulak, Chief
Wetlands Regulatory Section
Water Management Division
United States Environmental Protection Agency
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Mr. Pete Benjamin
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. Ron Sechler
National Marine Fisheries Service
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
r
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Mr. Scott McGill
Ecotone, Inc.
P.O. Box 5
Jarrettsville, Maryland 21084
Mr. Guy C. Pearce
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
Triage Check List
Date: k 4 0. ('
Project Name:
?r-e

To: ? ARO Kevin Barnett
? FRO Ken Averitte
? MRO Alan Johnson/Barry Love
? RRO Eric Kulz
From:

DWQ#: _72-0-V' oU ` /
A
County: ?k
WaRO Kyle Barnes
? WiRO Noelle Lutheran/Joanne Steenhuis
? WSRO Daryl Lamb
Telephone : (919) 33 % A
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/aVoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern

6;.
tfyr

;a`NW
?l
104
?A i
k.,
i'I t , st.
a -?
a?
r
JJJ did
J b'o
a?
vic) ear
0
¦
1
TopoZone - USGS Plymouth West (NC) Topo Map Page 1 of 2
USGS Topo Maps
0 1:24K/25K Topo Maps
O 1:100K Topo Maps
O 1:250K Topo Maps
Map Size
O Small
O Medium
* Large
View Scale
Coordinate Format
UTM
Map Datum
WGS84
0 Show target
Email this topo map
Bookmark this topo map
Print this topo map
USGS Plymouth West (
View TopoZone Pro topographic maps, aerial photos, s
0 0.3
0 0.2
0.6
0.4
0.9
T
0.6
Tol
mi
TopoZone.com © 1999-2006 Maps a la carte, Inc. - All rights reserved.
http://www.topozone.com/map.asp?z=18&n=3963157&e=331864&datum=nad83 6/30/2006
01
ECOTONE, Inc.
FOREST AND WETLAND CREATION
RIVER RESTORATION
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING AND PERMITTING
CONSTRUCTION
June 20, 2006
Ms. Cyndi Karoly r ? t n
401 Unit Supervisor
2321 Crab Tree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27699
RE: Modlin Property Wetland Restoration
DQQ 06-0981
Dear Ms. Karoly:
Thank you for your letter dated June 19, 2006. Enclosed please find a check for $475.
In our application, we indicate Albemarle Restorations, LLC as the project applicant and
Ecotone, Inc. as the Agent. I, Scott McGill, am a Principal of both firms. I authorize
Ecotone, Inc. to act as Agent for the purposes of the permit application to DWQ.
Thank you for taking the time to review this application and please contact me if you
have any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
Ec tone, c.
tt coil
Principal
111' FF ' ?" DD
V
JUN 2 3 2006
, - V'0-1 Lk GUALF Y
YVk ItANOs AND STOIRMWATER BRANCH
P.O. BOX 5, 1204 BALDWIN MILL ROAD
JARRETT8VILLE, MARYLAND 21084
[phone]
PAX [phone]
Or • • c,9 micnaei r. nasiey, vovernor
`01 pt'i William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
rte- North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
p Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
June 19, 2006
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
DWQ # 06-0981
Martin County
Ecotone, Inc.
Attn: Scott McGill
PO Box 5
Jarrettsville, Maryland 21084
Subject Property: Modlin Property WL Restoration
Impacts and Application Permitting Fee
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. McGill:
On June 16, 2006 the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated June 14, 2006,
that reflected stream impacts for the Modlin Property Wetland Restoration Project. In reviewing the
application, it reflects temporary intermittant stream impacts of 2,950 linear feet. The DWQ has
determined that your application was incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed
below. The DWQ will require additional information in order to process your application to impact
protected wetlands and/or streams on the subject property. Please provide the following information so
that we may set up and review your project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Application Permitting Fee
You have proposed impacts to an intermittent stream totaling 2,9501f. Please note that beginning
January 1, 1999, the N.C. General Assembly passed legislation requiring payment of a fee for all
401 applications. The fee for applications is $200 for projects impacting less than an acre of
wetland and less than 150 linear feet of streams. For projects impacting one or more acres of
wetland or 150 or more feet of streams, the fee is $475. We are returning your check for
correction of permitting fee amount.
2. A signed agent authorization letter will be necessary if Ecotone, Inc is acting on behalf of Mr.
Temple, Albemarle Restorations LLC.
Please contact the DWQ within three weeks of the date of this letter to verify that you have received this
letter and that you remain interested in continuing to pursue permitting of your project and will be
providing the DWQ the requested information at a later date. Please contact this office in writing. If we
do not hear from you within three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project
and we will consider the project as withdrawn.
NQthCaro?ina
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit lltllCQ<?!,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: httD://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
.,<
-?
>:,
':•a
. ,.?
??
??
:P
..
t
a
DWQ 06-0981 Modlin Property Wetland Restoration
Subject: DWQ 06-0981 Modlin Property Wetland Restoration
From: Laurie Dennison <laurie.j.dennison@ncmai].net>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 09:09:57 -0400
To: [e-mail]
Please see attached the Division of Water Quality's request for more information related to your
recent application. Please note that this message is being forwarded to you electronically so that
you may expedite preparation of your response. Please do not send your response as a reply to this
e-mail or via fax. The hard copy is being sent via US Mail. All response correspondence is to be
mailed via hard copy to the 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh,
NC, 27604 unless otherwise noted.
060981 Mod linPropertyW LRestoration(Ma rtin)_l m pacts_Fee Request.doc
Content-Type: application/msword
Content-Encoding: base64
1 of 1 6/20/2006 9:10 AM
ECOTONE, Inc.
FOREST AND WETLAND CREATION
RIVER RESTORATION
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING AND PERMITTING
PONDS AND STREAMS
CONSTRUCTION
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
401 Unit Supervisor
2321 Crab Tree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27699
RE: Modlin Property Wetland Restoration
Dear Ms. Karoly:
11 i , ., 1
p ? ? P wi1j006
JUN 1 6 2006
DENH .. WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
Ecotone, Inc., on behalf of our client, Albemarle Restorations, LLC, is requesting 401
State Water Quality Certification to restore 40 acres of riverine wetlands on the Modlin
Property, located on Poplar Chapel Road near Jamesville, in Martin County, North
Carolina.
Albemarle Restorations, LLC has contracted with the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem Enhancement Program to restore 40
acres of prior converted cropland. The project involves minor grading and shaping to
restore wetland hydrology as well as an extensive planting plan. A variety of wetland
types, including bottomland hardwood, scrub shrub, and emergent wetland types are
proposed to maximize habitat diversity. A conservation easement has been recorded to
protect the constructed wetlands in perpetuity. A small ditch traverses the center of the
project area and carries intermittent flow across the property. This ditch will be
temporarily impacted by the proposed grading activities. The foot print of the ditch will
be converted to vegetated nontidal wetlands.
We anticipate the Corps of Engineers will verify that the project is authorized under the
Nationwide Permit #27, Wetland and Riparian Restoration and Creation, and therefore
qualifies for General Water Quality Certification GC3495.
Enclosed please find seven (7) copies of the following:
• Completed Pre-Construction Notification Application Form;
• Wetland Restoration Plan Narrative;
• Wetland Restoration Plan Sheets;
• EEP Approval Letter;
• USDA-NRCS Prior Converted Wetlands Letter;
• Letter from the State Historical and Preservation Office;
• Exhibit A - Vicinity Map;
P.O. BOX 5, 1204 BALDWIN MILL ROAD
JARRETTSVILLE, MARYLAND 21084
[phone]
FAX [phone]
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Modlin Property Wetland Restoration
June 14, 2006
Page 2of2
• Exhibit B - Project Area in Relation to Sub-basin;
• Exhibit C - Project Area in Relation to Existing Forests; and
• Exhibit D - Photographs.
Thank you for taking the time to review this application and please contact me if you
have any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
Ee, Inc.
olt McGill
Principal
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
8 1
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 2 o `) 6 0 (9
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 27
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: E]
2 R II. Applicant Information ?!
D
1. Owner/Applicant Information JUN 1 6 2006
Name: Albemarle Restorations DENR - WATi=R 0, 1A1 11T
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 204 AND STORYIW7i R RRANru
Gatesville NC 27938
Contact: Mr. Scott McGill
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: smc g laecotoneinc com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Mr. Scott McGill
Company Affiliation: Ecotone Inc.
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 5,1204 Baldwin Mill Road
Jarrettsville MD 21084
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: smcgill(a-)ecotoneinc.com
Page 5 of 13
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Modlin Property Wetland Restoration
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0102371
4. Location
County: Martin Nearest Town: Jamesville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): NA
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Located on Poplar Chapel
Road near Jamesville, in Martin County, North Carolina
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35°47'55.16" °N 76°51'32.87" °W
6. Property size (acres): Approximately 159 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Cooper Swamp
8. River Basin: Roanoke
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is currently used for agficultural purposes
Page 6 of 13
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
project will restore 40 acres of riverine wetlands with a mix of bottomland hardwood, scrub
shrub and emergent wetland types The restoration plans have been developed based on
reference wetlands The project will involve minor grading, and shaping averaging less than
1 foot of cut/fill to restore wetland hydrology to the agricultural fields. Equipment that will
be used on site during construction may include excavators dozers loaders, track trucks, and
other standard excavation equipment
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The baseline goals of the project are to create
wetland hydrology and establish a viable community of wetland vegetation throughout the
project area The target plant community is a Bottomland Hardwood Forest interspersed with
shrub/scrub wetland and shallow open water habitats which will help provide a continuous
forested and diverse greenway along the tributary. Mitigation credits generated will be
utilized by the Ecosystem Enhancement Program to offset compensatory mitigation
requirements with Roanoke River Basin Cataloging unit 03010107.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.N/A
The project area is prior converted cropland See attached letter from NRCS.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No, the project site is protected in perpetuity through the recordation of a conservation easement
in the Land Records of Martin County, North Carolina.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
Page 7 of 13
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The existing ditch acting as a
stream is to be filled to create the desired hydrophytic conditions present in a diverse wetland
system Impacts to the ditch will be temporary since the ditch area will be converted to
wetlands.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
linear feet Area of
Impact
(acres)
NONE

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multi 1 length X width, then divide b 43,560.
Stream Impact
Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma Before Impact linear feet acres

I Ditch draining to Conversion to
wetlands
Intermittent 7.5 If
+/- 2,950 if
+/- .5 ac
Cooper Swamp (temporary)
Page 8 of 13
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) I +/- 2,950 If I +/- .5 ac
Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc. Area of
Impact
acres
NONE

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the proiect:
Stream Im act acres): +1-.5
Wetland Impact acres : 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) +1-.5
Total Stream Impact linear feet): +/-2,950
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
Page 9 of 13
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The proposed impacts are
temporary and beneficial to the wetland resource and its watershed. The project will restore
wetland hydrology to 40 acres of prior converted cropland. The conversion of ditch to wetland
will reduce erosion, enhance nutrient uptake, and provide beneficial wildlife habitat.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/sti-i-ni;ide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
Page 10 of 13
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The proposed project will create 40 acres of Riverine Wetlands within the Roanoke River
Basin A conservation easement will preserve the site in perpetuity. See Modlin Site
Riverine Wetland Project for specific details and information.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Page 11 of 13
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact I Multiplier I Required
,,?:.:..:...
3 (2 for Catawba)
1.5
Total I I I
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 213.0242 or.0244, or.0260. N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. N/A No proposed impervious surfaces.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XUL Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Page 12 of 13
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: The
project is designed to increase the quality of water downstream of the site
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Page 13 of 13
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Modlin Property Restoration Plan Narrative
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................1
2.0 Project Goals and Objectives ..............................................................2
3.0 Site Location .........................................................................................2
4.0 General Watershed Description ...........................................................2
5.0 Existing Site Conditions ...................................................................3
5.1 Soils .............................................................................................................3
5.2 Hydrology ............................................................................3
5.3 Adjoining Land Uses ...............................................................4
5.4 Threatened/Endangered Species and Existing Vegetation ....................4
5.5 Jurisdictional Wetlands ..............................................................
5.6 Historic Preservation .................................................................
6.0 Reference Wetlands .........................................................................5
6.1 Hydrological Characterization ...................................................5
6.2 Soil Characterization ...............................................................
6.3 Plant Community Characterization ..............................................6
7.0 Wetland Restoration Plan .................................................................6
7.1 Hydrologic Modifications .........................................................6
7.2 Soil Restoration .....................................................................7
7.3 Plant Community Restoration .....................................................7
7.4 Plant Material .......................................................................8
7.4.1 Planting Specifications ....................................................8
7.4.2 Storage and Delivery ......................................................8
7.4.3 Products .....................................................................8
7.4.4 Planting Procedures ........................................................9
7.4.5 Maintenance and Guarantee ..............................................9
7.5 Seeding ..................................................... ......................9
7.5.1 Final Grading ...............................................................9
7.5.2 Soil Amendment ............................................................. 10
7.5.3 Seedbed Preparation ...................................................... 10
7.5.4 Seed Specification ........................................................ 10
7.5.5 Method of Seeding ....................................................... 11
8.0 Monitoring ................................................................................ 11
9.0 Success Criteria .......................................................................... 12
10.0 References .................................................................................. 12
11.0 Restoration Plan Sheets ................................................................. 14
Appendix A - Figures
Appendix B - Supporting Documents
Recorded Easement
USDA Exemption
Historic Preservation
Threatened/Endangered Species
Appendix C - Photographs
Appendix D - Hydraulic and Hydrolgic Analysis (H&H Study)
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC.
Modlin Property Riverine Wedand Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation
1.0 Introduction
The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem
Enhancement Program has selected 40 acres of the property owned by William Nathan
Modlin for wetland restoration to fulfill a portion of the Request for Proposals: Full
Delivery Project Roanoke River Basin. The purpose of the RFP is to provide
compensatory stream, wetland and/or buffer mitigation within the Roanoke River Basin
Catologing Unit 03010107. The Request for Proposal has been designated RFP 16-
D05024 and the closing date for the request was February 17, 2005. Albemarle
Restorations, LLC entered into a contract with the State of North Carolina on June 27,
2005 to deliver 40 wetland mitigation units within this project site (Contract No. D05024-
1).
Albemarle Restorations, LLC proposes to create 40 acres of riverine wetlands (40
Wetland Mitigation Units) on the Modlin Property, located on Poplar Chapel Road near
Jamesville, in Martin County, North Carolina. The project site is in the above referenced
watershed and is in close proximity to Cooper Swamp. In addition, the site is within 1.5
miles of the Roanoke River and is within the required 5-year floodprone area.
The site has been chosen in part because of its location in a targeted watershed and
because it provides the opportunity to add contiguous wetland forest to the extensive and
diverse Roanoke River floodplain forest. The project's location in the Lower Roanoke
River Sub-basin (Sub-basin 03-02-09) allow the 40 acres to be placed in a conservation
easement to join more than 55,000 acres of protected land in the watershed, including
34,000 acres of publicly owned land and 21,000 acres of timberland under conservation
management. In addition, the project is located in a watershed upstream from the
Roanoke River (Sub-basin 03-02-09), which is listed on the North Carolina 303(d) List
of impaired waterways. The Lower Roanoke River Sub-basin is also one of seven
priority targets for The Nature Conservancy in North Carolina. This project site has been
selected because of the soils present, and a very shallow depth to groundwater (indicated
by extensive past ditching). Previous site visits have revealed high water marks from
frequent overbank flooding and widespread wet soil conditions. These factors indicate
that minimal grading will be necessary, and that the desired hydrophytic vegetation to be
planted will thrive.
An unnamed tributary to Cooper Swamp flows through the property, which is currently
used for agricultural purposes with very little native vegetation present. The conversion
of this site from agricultural use to established riverine wetlands will create a
nearly unbroken forested buffer along the entire tributary, making this a practical and
environmentally beneficial restoration project.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC.
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina- February 2006
Revised, May 2006
2.0 Project Goals and Objectives
The restoration plans have been developed based on reference wetlands and utilizing the
50 years of combined wetland restoration experience brought forth by the principals of
Albemarle Restorations, LLC. The baseline goals of the project are to create wetland
hydrology and establish a viable community of wetland vegetation throughout the project
area. Beyond that, the goals and objectives are as follows:
1) Provide floodflow attenuation.
2) Water Quality improvement through sediment, toxicant, and nutrient retention
and reduction.
3) Slow over bank flow rates and provide storage and desynchronization of flood
waters.
4) Alleviate downstream flooding issues by lessening the effect of pulse or
flashy flows.
5) Provide shading through forest cover to reduce algae growth and associated
low dissolved oxygen levels in surface water moving through the site.
6) The production and export of food sources.
7) The creation of wildlife habitat and recreational opportunities.
3.0 Site Location
The 40-acre project site is located in the center of the Modlin property, also known as
Cooper Swamp Farm, in the Deep Run Swamp Watershed (USGS Catalog Unit
03010107150010), a Targeted Local Watershed in the 2001 "Watershed Restoration Plan
for the Roanoke River Basin" released by the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program. The restoration site lies along the mid and upper reaches of an unnamed
tributary to Cooper Swamp found on the +/- 159-acre Modlin property. The site is
accessed from Poplar Chapel Road, south of Jamesville, via and existing farm lane
serving the Modlin and adjoining properties. Figure 1 is a vicinity map found in
Appendix A. Downstream from the site, the tributary runs almost entirely through
wooded areas containing extensive wetlands before joining the main stem of Cooper
Swamp. Above the site, the headwaters and upper reaches of the tributary are located in
forested and forested wetland areas. The tributary and the proximity of the site to nearby
forested areas on the most recent available GIS air photos of the area are shown on
Figure 2 in Appendix A.
4.0 General Watershed Description
The project site is located in Targeted Local Watershed 50010, Deep Swamp Run, which
lies in Sub-basin 03-02-09, the Lower Roanoke River. The following information was
extrapolated from the "Watershed Restoration Plan for the Roanoke River Basin, 2001."
Forested land constitutes 71% of the land in Sub-basin 03-02-09, while 25% is
agricultural in this 559 square mile area through which the lower 83 miles of the Roanoke
River and its tributaries flow. In 1990 the population in this sub-basin was estimated at
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC. 2
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina- February 2006
Revised, May 2006
58,886 people. Channelized headwaters of Deep Swamp Run have led to critical habitat
loss in the watershed which is bordered by broad floodplain forests (DWQ, 2001). Deep
Run Swamp is not within a DWQ water Supply Watershed, is not a Designated High
Quality or Outstanding Resource Water, and has no presence of the Aquatic Natural
Heritage Element.
5.0 Existing Site Conditions
The Modlin farm consists of approximately 159 +/- acres, 40 of which are designated for
this project site. These 40 acres are located within the central portion of the farm. This
area is bisected by a deep drainage ditch that runs southwest from the property boundary,
then curves toward the northwest, extending to the western property line, and is currently
bordered by agricultural fields of the remaining Modlin farm to the north, south, and
west, and timberland to the east. The Modlin residence is located to the northwest of the
parcel and the surrounding area consists of residential, agricultural, and timberland
properties. Degradation to the channel and surrounding areas by past agricultural
activities, including channel straightening and planting of row crops up to the channel
edges, allow excessive nutrient and sediment accumulation in the channel. These past
activities have also served to reduce the flood flow attenuation capabilities of the historic
undisturbed channel. Appendix C contains photographs taken during a recent site visit,
showing the degradation of the channel and the proximity of tilled ground. The site is not
located within a FEMA regulated floodplain, therefore floodplain requirements are not
addressed in this restoration plan.
5.1 Soils
Soils examined at several locations throughout the project site in fall of 2004
exhibited strong hydric indicators, including sulfitic odor and deep gray color to a
depth of 18 inches. The majority of the site soils are mapped Bethera loam, with
a small portion mapped Lenoir loam. Bethera loam is a poorly drained, nearly
level soil which exhibits moderately slow to slow permeability and moderate to
high available water capacity. The seasonal high water table is at or within 1 foot
of the surface. Lenoir loam is somewhat poorly drained, nearly level, has slow
permeability, and moderate available water capacity. During wet months, the
seasonal high water table is at a depth of 1 to 2.5 feet.
5.2 Hydrology
The project site is currently bisected by a drainage ditch created when the land
was converted to cropland. The proposed design calls for the ditch to be filled
and a broad flat drainage course to be created to mimic conditions found in
riverine wetlands just below headwater areas. The hydrology of the project
wetlands is to be derived from overbank flooding of the drainage course,
supplemented by a high water table associated with the Bethera soils. The
Bethera loam mapped on the site is classified as hydric with a seasonally high
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC. 3
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
water table and low hydraulic conductivity which allows surface and subsurface
water to be retained for long periods during the growing season. The Hydric
Code for the soil is (1), meaning it is saturated for a significant period during the
growing season. Based on historical accounts from the property owner the area
was wetland prior to being cleared and ditched. Hydrology is similar to
conditions at the reference site and wetland hydrology should be achieved quickly
after the site grading is completed.
5.3 Adjoining Land Uses
The topography of the project site is extremely flat, with slightly lower elevations
on the western side at a tributary of Cooper Swamp. Properties to the east and
northeast of the project site that are within the project site's drainage area are
mapped as agricultural fields or timberland.
5.4 Threatened/Endangered Species and Existing Vegetation
On August 23, 2005 a letter (see Appendix B) was sent by Albemarle
Restorations, LLC to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services
Office requesting a project review for coordination under the Endangered Species
Act, the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.
Albemarle Restorations, LLC received no response. A review of Martin County's
Threatened and Endangered Species list showed only one threatened species, the
Bald Eagle. Neither this species, nor its habitat, is currently found on the project
site.
The only existing vegetation within the project area consists of soybeans grown
for agricultural purposes. The lines of trees that transected the project site, or
"windrows" as Mr. Modlin referred to them, have been cleared. Any native
vegetation present is incidental and on a scale that is not measurable for the
purposes of this report.
5.5 Jurisdictional Wetlands
A letter dated March 23, 2005 (see Appendix B) was received by Mr. Modlin
from the United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources
Conservation Service in Williamston, NC. The letter states that the land in
question was cleared for the planting of crops in the late 1970's, and is designated
as Prior Converted Wetlands, making it exempt from any USDA regulations.
Based upon field investigations and the above referenced Prior Converted ruling,
it is our belief that no jurisdictional wetlands are found on the project site. A
request for a formal Jurisdictional Determination by the COE has been made, and
results of the Determination will be supplied when completed.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC.
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina- February 2006
Revised, May 2006
5.6 Historic Preservation
On September 8, 2005 Ecotone, Inc. received a letter (see Appendix B) from the
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation
Office concerning the subject site. The letter states that the above agency is
"aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project."
6.0 Reference Wetlands
Two separate wetlands, one in the Cooper Swamp drainage and the other in the Clark
Mill Creek drainage (a tributary to the Pungo River watershed), were used as reference
sites for this project. Site 1 is approximately 2,000 ft west of the intersection of Poplar
Chapel Rd and the CSX Railroad. This intersection is a'/4 mile south of U.S. Highway
64, 1 mile east of Jamesville, NC. Site 2 is approximately 2,400 ft north of U.S. Route
264 on the Armstrong Property in Ponzer, Hyde County, NC.
Site 1 is in Martin County, North Carolina and was sampled on February 10, 2006. This
is a wetland site typical of a mid-age stand of mixed hardwoods and pine that would be
found in wetlands throughout northeastern North Carolina. Site 2 is in Hyde County, and
is a typical Cypress-Gum Riverine Wetland.
6.1 Hydrological Characterization
The hydrology of site 1 is seasonally or semi-permanently inundated or saturated
during the growing season. At site 2 the hydrology is best characterized as
seasonally flooded or semi-permanently inundated. At both sites, the hydrology
is derived from a combination of a high groundwater table, slow permeability, and
overbank flooding. Microtopography variations create soil conditions at both
sites ranging from inundation up to 18 inches to saturation at a depth of ten
inches.
6.2 Soil Characterization
The soils at site 1 were mapped Bethera loam, 0-2 percent slopes, and poorly
drained. Field observations confirmed this mapped type. A profile of the soils at
site 1 produced the following: Horizon A was found from a depth of 0-6 inches
and was of a loam/organic nature. Horizon B occurred from a depth of 6-11 inches
and was clay/loam in nature with a matrix color of 10YR 511, and mottle colors of
10YR 5/8. Mottles were common in abundance and distinct in contrast. Horizon
B2 occurred from a depth of 9-18 inches and was also of a clay/loam nature with
a matrix color of IOYR 5/1, and mottle colors of IOYR 6/8. Mottles were
common in abundance and distinct in contrast. All colors described at this site are
considered Munsell Moist.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC.
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina- February 2006
Revised, May 2006
The soils at reference site 2 were mapped Dorovan muck, 0-1 percent slopes, and
frequently flooded. Field observations confirmed this mapped type. A profile of
the soils at site 2 produced the following: The O Horizon was found from a depth
of 0-3 inches and was of a loam/organic nature. Horizon A occurred from a depth
of 3-9 inches and was silty loam with a matrix color of 10YR 3/1. Horizon B
occurred from a depth of 9 inches on, and was silty clay with a matrix color of
10YR 4/1. Photographs for both reference sites can be found in Appendix C.
6.3 Plant Community Characterization
At site 1, 95 percent of the dominant species were OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-). Vegetation was dense in the shrub and canopy layers, with a
typical understory for this area containing switch cane, pepper bush, and younger
canopy species (red maple, sweet gum). The mid-level canopy was dominated by
younger canopy species and shrub/scrub (sweet bay, wax myrtle). The canopy
included loblolly pine, swamp white oak, water oak, pin oak, and red maple. See
Appendix C for photographs of the site.
At site 2, 100 percent of the dominant species were OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-). The forest type was a middle-age mixed stand with the canopy
dominated by bald cypress, and understory containing sweetgum, red maple,
sweetbay magnolia, American holly, and loblolly pine. The shrub layer contained
sweet bay, highbush blueberry, and fetter-bush with greenbriar and Japanese
honeysuckle. See Appendix C for photographs.
7.0 Wetland Restoration Plan
The goal of the proposed restoration plan is to create a riverine wetland system typically
found in the middle to upper reaches of first order tributary systems. The target plant
community is a Bottomland Hardwood Forest interspersed with shrub/scrub wetland and
shallow open water habitats, which will help provide a continuous forested and diverse
greenway along the tributary. Any invasive or exotic species found on the site while earth
work is being completed will be removed through physical or chemical means.
7.1 Hydrologic Modifications
Hydrologic modifications on the site will be achieved through the filing of the
main ditch bisecting the site and contributing side ditches, and creating a broad
drainage course with a very low gradient (less than 0.5 percent slope) and an
associated low floodplain. Overland flow from the 141-acre drainage area will
inundate the entire area during major flooding events (see Appendix D for the
HEC-RAS analysis of the site), and the seasonally high water table historically
found on the site will maintain saturated soils throughout significant periods
during the growing season.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC.
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
To add to the retention time of flooding events in the wetland area,
microtopography will be used to create hummocks and depressions found in
undisturbed swamps in the area and two low berm structures have been designed
at the lower end of the system. The outfall from the system is in the center of the
downstream berm structure, and will channel flood flows through a wide outfall
into the existing ditch that will remain at the western edge of the property. A
series of supplemental ditches, located outside the project area, will be installed to
prevent hydrologic trespass onto adjacent cropland.
7.2 Soil Restoration
Soils found in the project area currently exhibit hydric characteristics and will
remain. In areas where grading of more than one and one-half feet is proposed,
soil from the upper horizon will be stockpiled and redistributed prior to
establishing final grade. Because sufficient organic material appears to be present
to a significant depth, no amendments are specified. Large woody debris
encountered in windrows currently within the project area will be placed
throughout the created wetlands to add variety to soil conditions and encourage
diversity of volunteer species.
7.3 Plant Community Restoration
The plant species chosen for the project are native to the area, with an emphasis
on species that will provide habitat and a viable, yearlong food source for a wide
range of animal and plant species. Surrounding areas are home to bear, whitetail
deer, raccoon, squirrel, fox, migrating waterfowl, and a wide variety of amphibian
and reptile species, and the project is intended provide food and habitat to
complement and enhance the existing ecosystem. Hydrophytic species shown on
the planting plan were selected to create a diverse matrix of wetland communities
including Bottomland Hardwood Forest interspersed areas of open water and
emergent wetland. Invasive and exotic species will not be planted on the site.
Any invasive or exotic species found on the site will be removed through physical
or chemical means during the planting phase. In selecting vegetation, we have
considered the reference riverine wetland areas adjacent to the site and "Dominant
Plants for Major Wetland Types" published by the North Carolina Department of
Environment Water Quality Section. Sheet P-2 contains detailed planting and
seeding schedules for the site.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC.
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
7.4 Plant Material
7.4.1 Planting Specifications
1. Planting material will conform to the current issue of the "American
Standards for Nursery Stock", published by the "American Association of
Nurserymen".
2. The root system of plant material shall be well-developed and
undamaged, and the plant size must conform to the size specified. Plants
not meeting these criteria will be rejected.
3. Foliage of non-dormant plants shall appear healthy, with no leaf spots,
damage, discoloration, or wilting, and no evidence of insects on the plant.
Plants not meeting these criteria will be rejected.
4. Planting materials may be substituted upon written approval from
Albemarle Restorations, LLC.
7.4.2 Storage and Delivery
1. Seed shall be delivered in containers having labels reporting the origin,
purity, and germination percentage of the seed, and the date of
germination testing of the seed.
2. All bare root plants shall be clearly and correctly labeled to allow
confirmation of species and quantities. At least 25% of each species in
every shipment shall have legible labels securely attached prior to delivery
to the site.
3. All plants delivered to the project site must have thoroughly moist
soil/root masses. Dry or light-weight plants shall be rejected.
4. All rejected material shall be immediately removed from the project
site.
5. All plants delivered to the project site shall be stored in a cool, shaded
location, and watered regularly so that roots are kept moist until time of
planting.
7.4.3 Products
1. Planting Schedules specifying quantity, species, size, condition, and
spacing can be found on Sheet P-2 of the Restoration Design Plan Sheets.
2. Straw shall be from small grain species such as wheat or barley, and
shall be free of rot, mildew, and noxious weed seeds.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC.
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
7.4.4 Planting Procedures
1. Planting shall be performed in accordance with the current edition of
the Landscape Contractors Association "Landscape Specification
Guidelines" and as specified below.
2. Plants shall be randomly installed within the planting area, using the
plant spacing specified in the plant schedule as a guide.
3. Bare root stock shall be planted during the period of February 1 - April
30. Planting outside of these specified dates is not permissible without
approval from Albemarle Restorations, LLC.
4. Planting shall not occur during periods of sub-freezing temperatures,
when the ground is frozen or excessively wet or dry, or when other
conditions not generally accepted as suitable for planting persist.
5. Bare root stock shall be planted within two days of shipment.
6. Bare root seedlings and whips shall be minimum 1/4" to 1/2" caliper.
7. Bare root seedlings and whips shall be planted in accordance with the
detail provided on Sheet P-2 of the Restoration Design Plan Sheets unless
otherwise approved by Albemarle Restorations, LLC.
8. All woody material must be planted erect. Plants leaning greater than
10 degrees from perpendicular must be straightened or replanted by the
Contractor.
7.4.5 Maintenance and Guarantee
1. Plant material shall be maintained by the Contractor for one full year
from the date of final inspection and acceptance by Albermarle
Restorations, LLC. Maintenance shall include the removal and one-time
replacement of all dead or diseased woody vegetation.
2. The Contractor shall guarantee an 80% survival of all plants for the one
year period stated above, except in the case of damage by fire, animal
damage, vandalism, or other events beyond the Contractors ability to
control.
3. Plants which are 25% dead or more shall be considered dead.
4. Replacement plants shall be of the same type, size, and variety as the
plants specified herein, or substitutions approved by Albermarle
Restorations, LLC. Replacement plants shall be provided and installed
subject to the requirements of these plans and specifications.
7.5 Seeding
7.5.1 Final Grading
1. Prior to seeding, remove any mounds or surface irregularities not in
conformance with grading plan. Areas that have experienced washing out,
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC.
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina- February 2006
Revised, May 2006
rilling, or sediment deposition shall be reconstructed and grades re-
established by the Contractor in accordance with the plan or as otherwise
directed by Albemarle Restorations, LLC.
2. After bringing the wetland creation area to final grades, loosen soil by
discing or scarifying to a depth of at least 3 inches.
3. Prior to seeding, remove all trash, debris and large objects such as
stones that might interfere with the seeding operation.
4. Seeding of wetland areas is to be according to the Wetland Seed Mix
detail on Sheet P-2 of the Restoration Design Plan Sheets. Seed shall be
spread with a broadcast spreader and may be mixed with dry sand to
facilitate even spreading.
7.5.2 Soil Amendments
1. Soil tests must be performed to determine if lime and/or fertilizer are
required within seeding areas. Soil analysis may be performed by the
N.C. Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Agronomic
Division or a recognized commercial laboratory.
2. Amend soil as needed based on N.C. Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services Agronomic Division recommendations.
7.5.3 Seedbed Preparation
1. Seedbed preparation shall consist of loosening soil to a depth of 3-5"
by means of suitable agricultural or construction equipment such as disc
harrows or chisel plows or rippers mounted in construction equipment.
After the soil is loosened it should not be rolled or dragged smooth but left
in the roughened condition. Sloped areas (Exceeding 3:1) should be
tracked leaving an irregular surface with ridges running parallel to the
contour of the slope.
2. Apply fertilizer and lime if required.
3. If required, incorporate lime and fertilizer into the top 3-5" of soil by
disking or other suitable means.
7.5.4 Seed Specification
All seed shall be free of noxious weeds. All seed shall be subject to re-
testing by a recognized seed laboratory. All seed shall have been tested
within the 6 months immediately preceding the date of sowing such
materials on this job. Seed tags shall be made available to the inspector to
verify type and rate of seed used.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC. 10
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina- February 2006
Revised, May 2006
7.5.5 Methods of Seeding
1. Dry seeding: This includes use of conventional drop or broadcast
spreaders.
a) Seed spread dry shall be incorporated into the subsoil at the rates
prescribed on the temporary or permanent seeding summaries or tables 25
or 26. The seeded areas shall then be rolled with a weighted roller to
provide good seed to soil contact.
b) Where practical, seed should be applied in two directions perpendicular
to each other. Apply half the seeding rate in each direction.
2. Drill or cultipacker seeding: Mechanized seeders that apply and cover
seed with soil.
a) Cultipacking seeders are required to bury the seed in such a fashion as
to provide at least 1/4 inch of soil covering. Seedbed must be firm after
planting.
b) Where practical, seed should be applied in two directions perpendicular
to each other. Apply half the seeding rate in each direction.
8.0 Monitoring
Monitoring plots will be installed and permanently monumented upon completion of
plant installation. A minimum of one sampling quadrant will be located within each
proposed vegetative community. Piezometers will be installed to measure subsurface
water levels during the five-year monitoring period. Following construction, a Mitigation
Plan and As Built Drawings will be prepared for the site and submitted to EEP. The
Mitigation Plan will include the monitoring plan and protocol, as well as an invasive and
exotic species management plan. The management plan will identify potential invasive
species as defined in the "North Carolina Noxious Weed List", identify site constraints,
and provide for a two-part control plan. The first part of the two-part plan will suppress
the establishment of noxious plants through eradication of existing species seen on site
and installation of sufficient densities of native woody and herbaceous species. The
second part will be to implement an early detection and rapid response program, to
identify and remove invasive species before they become established.
Monitoring will be completed using random permanent sampling quadrants as outlined in
the Mitigation Plan for a minimum five-year period, or until success of the project can be
validated. Monitoring Reports will be submitted to EEP by December 31 of the year in
which the monitoring was conducted. In the unlikely event that success criteria outlined
below are not achieved by the end of the five-year minimum monitoring period, with
permission from EEP corrective measures including regrading, replanting, removal of
certain species, etc. will be performed. If areas are deemed to be severely deficient in
meeting the success criteria, Albemarle Restoration, LLC may opt to ask the Department
to allow corrective measures prior to the end of the five-year period.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC. 11
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina- February 2006
Revised, May 2006
9.0 Success Criteria:
Success of the project will go beyond the establishment of wetland hydrology and a
predominance of hydrophytic vegetation. Because the goals of the project are to create a
diverse wetland system, the success criteria will be tied directly to those goals. The
intent of the project is to create a diverse wetland forest, interspersed with small areas of
emergent wetlands, shallow open water, and hummocks. We believe that the creation of
this diverse system is necessary to provide the range of intended functions and values.
The primary indicators of success will therefore be the establishment of a range of
wetland hydrology including inundated, saturated, seasonally saturated, and upland
hummock areas. Approximate acreages for each wetland hydrologic regime are shown
on Sheet P-1 of the Restoration Design Plan Sheets. The site will be deemed successful
if the acreages of each regimes fall within a reasonable range related to the design during
normal climatic conditions. Site hydrology during years of excessive rainfall or extreme
drought will be assessed with climatic conditions in mind.
10.0 References
Albemarle Restorations, LLC. . Albemarle Restorations field data collection
within Martin County, North Carolina. 2005.
American Association of Nurserymen. The American Standard for Nursery Stock. 1250
I Street, N.W., Suite 500, Washington, DC. 1986.
Landscape Contractor's Association of Metropolitan Washington. Landscape
Specification Guidelines. LCAMW. Rockville, Maryland. 1993.
Lynch, Karen M. "Common Wetland Plants of North Carolina." NCDENR, Division of
Parks and Recreation Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality Water Quality Section. Raleigh, North Carolina:
Report # 97-01, August 1997.
McGill, S. "Technical Proposal Bid Number 16-DO5024 Modlin Property."
Albermarle Restorations, LLC. Gatesville, North Carolina. 2005.
North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Plant Industry
Division-Plant Protection Section. "North Carolina Noxious Weed List."
hLp://www.agr.state.nc.us/t)lantind/plant/weed/noxweed.htm. September 2005.
NCDENR, Division of Coastal Management. "GIS Wetland Type Mapping for the North
Carolina Coastal Plain." GIS Data Guidance Document.
http://dcm2.enr.state.nc.us/Wetlands/wtypeguidanceweb.pdf. September 2005.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC. 12
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources(NCDENR), Division
of Water Quality. "Roanoke River Basinwide Water Quality Management Plan."
July, 2001.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, NCDENR, Division of Parks and Recreation.
"Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Animal Species of North Carolina."
1999.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, NCDENR, Division of Parks and Recreation.
"Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Plant Species of North Carolina."
1999.
North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program. "Watershed
Restoration Plan for the Roanoke River Basin." North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR), Division of Water Quality.
2001.
Riddick, Lisa A. "Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Modlin Property, Poplar
Chapel Road Jamesville, Martin County, North Carolina." NorthEast
Environmental, P.C. October 10, 2005.
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service.
"Martin County Soil Survey." September, 1989.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service. "Martin County Endangered Species,
Threatened Species, and Federal Species of Concern." httP://nc-
es.fws.gov/es/cntylist/martin.html. September 2005.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC. 13
it
June 13, 2006
Albemarle Restorations, LLC
Attn: Ed Temple
404 Court Street
Gatesville, North Carolina 27938
Subject: Modlin Property Wetland Restoration Plan
Roanoke River Basin - Cataloging Unit 03010107
Martin County
Contract # D05024-1
Dear Mr. Temple:
In May 2006, Albemarle Restorations, LLC submitted the subject Restoration Plan for the
Modlin Property Wetland Restoration Full Delivery Project. The project is located off Poplar
Chapel Road near the Town of Jmesville in Martin County, North Carolina. The Restoration
Plan proposes to restore 40.0 acres of prior converted cropland by restoring wetland hydrology
and planting appropriate vegetation to establish a bottomland hardwood forest. The restored
system will mimic the conditions found in riverine wetlands just below headwater areas.
The Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) has reviewed the restoration plan and has no
comments at this time. Please proceed with acquiring all necessary permits and/or certifications
and complete the implementation of the earthwork portion of the mitigation project (Task 4).
If you have any questions, or wish to discuss this matter further, please contact me at (919)715-
1656 or email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Guy C. Pearce
EEP Full Delivery Program Supervisor
cc: files
Q?
Untied States Depwftamt of AgrlcMltme
6., N RCS
Natural Resources Conservatlori Service
104 Kehukee Park Road
Wipiamston, N.C. 27892
March 23, 2005
Mr. William N. Modlin
1841 Poplar Chapel Road
Jamesville, NC 27846
Dear Billy,
I have reviewed the soils maps on your tract 2087 of Poplar Chapel Road as it
relates to wetland classifications within USDA. The acreage proposed for the
conservation easement is comprised of Bethera loam soil and was cleared for
row crops in the late 1970's prior to the swampbuster provision's of the 1985
Food Security Act Therefore this area of approximately 120 acres is classed as
Prior Converted Wetlands (PC) and is exempt from. any USDA regulations.
Good luck on the wildlife enhancements that may be planned.
Sincerely,
4 V,
Rup W. Hasty
District Conservationist
USDA - NRCS
encl: Soils Map
Tract Map
156 EZ
The Natural Resources Conservation Service provides leadership In a partnership eHort to help people
conserve, maintain, and Improve our natural resources and environment,

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
state Historic Preservation Office
P&W B. Sen W&. Aft&hhMa' Office of Archives and History
Michael Easley, Governor Division of Historical Resources
l.isbed? C. . Evans, Secretary David Brook Director
Jeffrey ). Cmw, Dgmty Secretary
September 8, 2005
Scott McGill
Ecotone, Inc
PO Box 5
Jarrettsville, MD 21084
Re: Modhn Property, Cooper Swamp Farm Martin County, ER05-2015
Dear Mr. McGill:
Thank you for your letter of August 25, 2005, concerning the above project"
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
'['hank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledh en? revue coor?nabor, at 919-733-4763. In all future
t7l-ey, communication concerning this project, please cke the above-referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
P erSandbeck
IT
AI)MINISTR MOM
USTORATM
SURVEY & PLANNIM
541714. jJd sued. Rdd*Ptc
515 tt Blvd swem add* Pic
515 N. tlkd shod. RalOW Pic
?'?`°'r/69946t7
4617 Mrl serviee Ceo ,, Rakiel?
MIUM
m Cq,IOMR> NC X17
+617 Mel Saos
4617 Mail Suvka O"W. Raiejo NC rM994617
3-8653
801
(919)7 33654 54
(919)7336545/715-4801

Q
O ?
?O
m

F PGp,N

i

I
/ I
I
J I -- /
-,
JAMESVILLE
??
--- -

ELIJAH LEE RD
; ,

COOPER
p o

w
PROJECT AREA

?uq s R
SW
n. o

-
1 1 Q
u I
1 I
j
_ FgSON ?
_RO _-?c S?-
Q \ ?
? ? ?
I I-_ ?
-
O - t
NIE `r!y \? ?? I

z ` J
1
z / ? Iw
z
SCALE
0 4000 8000
EXHIBIT A
INC
ECOTONE Vicinity Map
, MODUN PROPERTY
RIVERINE WETLAND RESTORATION 40 WMU's
P.O. Box 5. 1204 Baldwin Mill Road •JarrettrAlle, Maryland 21084 Scale: 1" = 4000' 1/2005
f 1 Drawn By: LMS
[phone] • Fax [phone] • E-Mail info/ecotoneinc.com
2 0 2 4 6 8 Miles
Roanoke
River Basin
Subbasin 09
N
W E
S
Use Support Ratings
Oak City
VJfiliamston
PROJECT AREA
Fully Supporting
Partially Supporting
Not Supporting
US 64 i Not Monitored
Not Rated
Primary Roads
County Boundary
Welch Creek Municipalities
C Targeted Local Watershed
LanierSwemp 0 Loam Watershed Boundaries
Deep Rtm Swamp
50010
Hardison Mill Creek
This map was produced on 03129/2Wl
by the North Caroline Division of Water
Qual ty Wetlands Restoration Program.
Data was provided by the Nort^ Caroline
:'Carter for Geographic Information and
Ana ysis.
The map is based on
Projection: Stateplare
Zone: 4901
DatLm:NAD83
Spheroid: GRS1980
units: Meters
Roanoke River Basin Subbasin 09
Copyright WATERSHED RESTORATION PLAN FOR THE ROANOKE BASIN EXHIBIT B
SCALE AS SHOWN ECOTONE, I N C PROJECT AREA IN RELATION TO SUBBASIN
6/2005 Drawn By: LMS P.O. SoK 5.1204 Baldwin Mitt Road.Jarmtttvitk, Maryland 21084 MODLJN PROPERTY
[phone]•Fax[phone]•E-KagWoeewtoneincmm RIVERINE WETLAND RESTORATION 40 WMU's
~r
MCD04t
t e ?
J
9
CONEIg"IAN
psorlm I=
WAMP
ro
EXISTING FO EST .:.. a F
Fz EXISTING FOREST
i? EXHIBIT
•'r ,ham ?_ ?? -? = ? x ' ?n ?i- ??. •R
?„?.+• _ „?; `'?, PROJECT AREA
< t - _-- y t' cozy
IN RELATION TO
EXISTING FOREST:
PROJECT AREA
E
,may
f
1_
p.A ?
A 1?6T1
PLAN VIEW sr?ts nt
ECOTONE, INC. ALBERMAP.:E USMPATMW, U-- .,? pm e? ?
?..?...
SCJILE .. .? ? nu??m l[OW PYO?IY
?...?.? ?,...?...,? .R,...?.o,v.,o. aasmta a aw MUM MOD
MUM N (40 TKUs)
- awnr ?w
F
a
Photo 1: Ditch within the
Photo 2: Ditch adjacent to cropland
Wetland Restoration Area.
Restoration Area
Photo 4: Wooded parcel adjacent to Riverine Wetland Restoration Area.
ECOTONE, Inc.
FOREST AND WETLAND CREATION
RIVER RESTORATION
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING AND PERMITTING
PONDS AND STREAMS
CONSTRUCTION
June 14, 2006
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
401 Unit Supervisor
2321 Crab Tree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27699
RE: Modlin Property Wetland Restoration
Dear Ms. Karoly:
Ecotone, Inc., on behalf of our client, Albemarle Restorations, LLC, is requesting 401
State Water Quality Certification to restore 40 acres of riverine wetlands on the Modlin
Property, located on Poplar Chapel Road near Jamesville, in Martin County, North
Carolina.
Albemarle Restorations, LLC has contracted with the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem Enhancement Program to restore 40
acres of prior converted cropland. The project involves minor grading and shaping to
restore wetland hydrology as well as an extensive planting plan. A variety of wetland
types, including bottomland hardwood, scrub shrub, and emergent wetland types are
proposed to maximize habitat diversity. A conservation easement has been recorded to
protect the constructed wetlands in perpetuity. A small ditch traverses the center of the
project area and carries intermittent flow across the property. This ditch will be
temporarily impacted by the proposed grading activities. The foot print of the ditch will
be converted to vegetated nontidal wetlands.
We anticipate the Corps of Engineers will verify that the project is authorized under the
Nationwide Permit #27, Wetland and Riparian Restoration and Creation, and therefore
qualifies for General Water Quality Certification GC3495.
Enclosed please find seven (7) copies of the following:
• Completed Pre-Construction Notification Application Form;
• Wetland Restoration Plan Narrative;
• Wetland Restoration Plan Sheets;
• EEP Approval Letter;
• USDA-NRCS Prior Converted Wetlands Letter;
• Letter from the State Historical and Preservation Office;
• Exhibit A - Vicinity Map;
P.O. BOX 5, 1204 BALDWIN MILL ROAD JUN 1 9 2006
JARRETTSVILLE, MARYLAND 21084 4JI`? ?1
[phone] DENIA,WATER uUALIf'y
FAX [phone] WETLANDS AND sTORMWATER BRANCH
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Modlin Property Wetland Restoration
June 14, 2006
Page 2 of 2
• Exhibit B - Project Area in Relation to Sub-basin;
• Exhibit C -Project Area in Relation to Existing Forests; and
• Exhibit D - Photographs.
Thank you for taking the time to review this application and please contact me if you
have any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
Ee, Inc.
olt McGill
Principal
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
r () r1 r
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
fit any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 27
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information D r ? R' Q ?°1 n
IJ
1. Owner/Applicant Information JUN X 6 2006
Name: Albemarle Restorations
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 204 YYE7LAMR AM STORMWATER BRANCH
Gatesville NC 27938
Contact: Mr. Scott McGill
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: smcgill(a)ecotoneinc.com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Mr. Scott McGill
Company Affiliation: Ecotone Inc.
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 5,1204 Baldwin Mill Road
Jarrettsville MD 21084
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: smcgillaecotoneinc.com
Page 5 of 13
111. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Modlin Property Wetland Restoration
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0102371
4. Location
County: Martin Nearest Town: Jamesville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): NA
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Located on Poplar Chapel
Road near Jamesville, in Martin County North Carolina
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35°47'55.16" °N 76°51'32.87" °W
6. Property size (acres): Approximately 159 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Cooper Swamp
8. River Basin:
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is currently used for agricultural purposes
Page 6 of 13
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
project will restore 40 acres of riverine wetlands with a mix of bottomland hardwood, scrub
shrub and emergent wetland types The restoration plans have been developed based on
reference wetlands The project will involve minor grading and shaping averaging less than
1 foot of cut/fill to restore wetland hydrology to the agricultural fields. Equipment that will
be used on site during construction may include excavators dozers loaders, track trucks, and
other standard excavation equipment.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The baseline goals of the project are to create
wetland hydrology and establish a viable community of wetland vegetation throughout the
project area The target plant community is a Bottomland Hardwood Forest interspersed with
shrub/scrub wetland and shallow open water habitats which will help provide a continuous
forested and diverse erg_ enway along the tributary Mitigation credits generated will be
utilized by the Ecosystem Enhancement Program to offset compensatory mitigation
requirements with Roanoke River Basin Cataloging unit 03010107.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.N/A
The project area is prior converted cropland See attached letter from NRCS.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No the project site is protected in perpetuity through the recordation of a conservation easement
in the Land Records of Martin County North Carolina.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
Page 7 of 13
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The existing ditch acting. as a
stream is to be filled to create the desired hydrophytic conditions present in a diverse wetland
system Impacts to the ditch will be temporary since the ditch area will be converted to
wetlands.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
es/no Distance to
Nearest
Stream
linear feet Area of
Impact
(acres)
NONE

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multi 1 len h X width, then divide b 43,560.
Stream Impact
Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma Before Impact linear feet acres

I Ditch draining to Conversion to
wetlands
Intermittent 7.5 if
+/- 2,950 if
+/- .5 ac
Cooper Swamp (temporary)
Page 8 of 13
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) I +/- 2,950 If I +/- .5 ac
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc. Area of
Impact
acres
NONE

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the proiect:
Stream Im act (acres : +1-.5
Wetland Impact acres : 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) +1-.5
Total Stream Impact linear feet): +/-2,950
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
Page 9 of 13
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The proposed impacts are
temporary and beneficial to the wetland resource and its watershed. The project will restore
wetland hydrology to 40 acres of prior converted cropland. The conversion of ditch to wetland
will reduce erosion, enhance nutrient uptake, and provide beneficial wildlife habitat.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
Page 10 of 13
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The proposed project will create 40 acres of Riverine Wetlands within the Roanoke River
Basin A conservation easement will preserve the site in perpetuity. See Modlin Site
Riverine Wetland Project for specific details and information.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Page 11 of 13
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 213.0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 0213.0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
I I Zone* Impact Multiplier I Required
(sauare feet) Mitivation
3 (2 for Catawba)
1.5
Total
' Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. N/A No proposed impervious surfaces.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Page 12 of 13
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetIands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: The
project is designed to increase the quality of water downstream of the site
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Page 13 of 13
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Modlin Property Restoration Plan Narrative
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................1
2.0 Project Goals and Objectives ..............................................................2
3.0 Site Location .........................................................................................2
4.0 General Watershed Description ...........................................................2
5.0 Existing Site Conditions ...................................................................3
5.1 Soils .............................................................................................................3
5.2 Hydrology ............................................................................
5.3 Adjoining Land Uses ...............................................................4
5.4 Threatened/Endangered Species and Existing Vegetation ....................4
5.5 Jurisdictional Wetlands ..............................................................
5.6 Historic Preservation .................................................................
6.0 Reference Wetlands ......................................................................... 5
6.1 Hydrological Characterization ................................................... 5
6.2 Soil Characterization ............................................................... 5
6.3 Plant Community Characterization .............................................. 6
7.0 Wetland Restoration Plan ................................................................. 6
7.1 Hydrologic Modifications ......................................................... 6
7.2 Soil Restoration ..................................................................... 7
7.3 Plant Community Restoration .....................................................
7.4 Plant Material .......................................................................8
7.4.1 Planting Specifications .................................................... 8
7.4.2 Storage and Delivery ...................................................... 8
7.4.3 Products ..................................................................... 8
7.4.4 Planting Procedures ........................................................9
7.4.5 Maintenance and Guarantee ............................................ ..9
7.5 Seeding ............................................................................ ..9
7.5.1 Final Grading ............................................................. ..
7.5.2 Soil Amendment ............................................................. 10
7.5.3 Seedbed Preparation ...................................................... 10
7.5.4 Seed Specification ........................................................ 10
7.5.5 Method of Seeding ....................................................... 11
8.0 Monitoring ................................................................................. 11
9.0 Success Criteria .......................................................................... 12
10.0 References .................................................................................. 12
11.0 Restoration Plan Sheets ................................................................. 14
Appendix A - Figures
Appendix B - Supporting Documents
Recorded Easement
USDA Exemption
Historic Preservation
Threatened/Endangered Species
Appendix C - Photographs
Appendix D - Hydraulic and Hydrolgic Analysis (H&H Study)
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC.
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation
1.0 Introduction
The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem
Enhancement Program has selected 40 acres of the property owned by William Nathan
Modlin for wetland restoration to fulfill a portion of the Request for Proposals: Full
Delivery Project Roanoke River Basin. The purpose of the RFP is to provide
compensatory stream, wetland and/or buffer mitigation within the Roanoke River Basin
Catologing Unit 03010107. The Request for Proposal has been designated RFP 16-
D05024 and the closing date for the request was February 17, 2005. Albemarle
Restorations, LLC entered into a contract with the State of North Carolina on June 27,
2005 to deliver 40 wetland mitigation units within this project site (Contract No. D05024-
1).
Albemarle Restorations, LLC proposes to create 40 acres of riverine wetlands (40
Wetland Mitigation Units) on the Modlin Property, located on Poplar Chapel Road near
Jamesville, in Martin County, North Carolina. The project site is in the above referenced
watershed and is in close proximity to Cooper Swamp. In addition, the site is within 1.5
miles of the Roanoke River and is within the required 5-year floodprone area.
The site has been chosen in part because of its location in a targeted watershed and
because it provides the opportunity to add contiguous wetland forest to the extensive and
diverse Roanoke River floodplain forest. The project's location in the Lower Roanoke
River Sub-basin (Sub-basin 03-02-09) allow the 40 acres to be placed in a conservation
easement to join more than 55,000 acres of protected land in the watershed, including
34,000 acres of publicly owned land and 21,000 acres of timberland under conservation
management. In addition, the project is located in a watershed upstream from the
Roanoke River (Sub-basin 03-02-09), which is listed on the North Carolina 303(d) List
of impaired waterways. The Lower Roanoke River Sub-basin is also one of seven
priority targets for The Nature Conservancy in North Carolina. This project site has been
selected because of the soils present, and a very shallow depth to groundwater (indicated
by extensive past ditching). Previous site visits have revealed high water marks from
frequent overbank flooding and widespread wet soil conditions. These factors indicate
that minimal grading will be necessary, and that the desired hydrophytic vegetation to be
planted will thrive.
An unnamed tributary to Cooper Swamp flows through the property, which is currently
used for agricultural purposes with very little native vegetation present. The conversion
of this site from agricultural use to established riverine wetlands will create a
nearly unbroken forested buffer along the entire tributary, making this a practical and
environmentally beneficial restoration project.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC.
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
2.0 Project Goals and Objectives
The restoration plans have been developed based on reference wetlands and utilizing the
50 years of combined wetland restoration experience brought forth by the principals of
Albemarle Restorations, LLC. The baseline goals of the project are to create wetland
hydrology and establish a viable community of wetland vegetation throughout the project
area. Beyond that, the goals and objectives are as follows:
1) Provide floodflow attenuation.
2) Water Quality improvement through sediment, toxicant, and nutrient retention
and reduction.
3) Slow over bank flow rates and provide storage and desynchronization of flood
waters.
4) Alleviate downstream flooding issues by lessening the effect of pulse or
flashy flows.
5) Provide shading through forest cover to reduce algae growth and associated
low dissolved oxygen levels in surface water moving through the site.
6) The production and export of food sources.
7) The creation of wildlife habitat and recreational opportunities.
3.0 Site Location
The 40-acre project site is located in the center of the Modlin property, also known as
Cooper Swamp Farm, in the Deep Run Swamp Watershed (USGS Catalog Unit
03010107150010), a Targeted Local Watershed in the 2001 "Watershed Restoration Plan
for the Roanoke River Basin" released by the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program. The restoration site lies along the mid and upper reaches of an unnamed
tributary to Cooper Swamp found on the +/- 159-acre Modlin property. The site is
accessed from Poplar Chapel Road, south of Jamesville, via and existing farm lane
serving the Modlin and adjoining properties. Figure 1 is a vicinity map found in
Appendix A. Downstream from the site, the tributary runs almost entirely through
wooded areas containing extensive wetlands before joining the main stem of Cooper
Swamp. Above the site, the headwaters and upper reaches of the tributary are located in
forested and forested wetland areas. The tributary and the proximity of the site to nearby
forested areas on the most recent available GIS air photos of the area are shown on
Figure 2 in Appendix A.
4.0 General Watershed Description
The project site is located in Targeted Local Watershed 50010, Deep Swamp Run, which
lies in Sub-basin 03-02-09, the Lower Roanoke River. The following information was
extrapolated from the "Watershed Restoration Plan for the Roanoke River Basin, 2001."
Forested land constitutes 71% of the land in Sub-basin 03-02-09, while 25% is
agricultural in this 559 square mile area through which the lower 83 miles of the Roanoke
River and its tributaries flow. In 1990 the population in this sub-basin was estimated at
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC. 2
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina- February 2006
Revised, May 2006
58,886 people. Channelized headwaters of Deep Swamp Run have led to critical habitat
loss in the watershed which is bordered by broad floodplain forests (DWQ, 2001). Deep
Run Swamp is not within a DWQ water Supply Watershed, is not a Designated High
Quality or Outstanding Resource Water, and has no presence of the Aquatic Natural
Heritage Element.
5.0 Existing Site Conditions
The Modlin farm consists of approximately 159 +/- acres, 40 of which are designated for
this project site. These 40 acres are located within the central portion of the farm. This
area is bisected by a deep drainage ditch that runs southwest from the property boundary,
then curves toward the northwest, extending to the western property line, and is currently
bordered by agricultural fields of the remaining Modlin farm to the north, south, and
west, and timberland to the east. The Modlin residence is located to the northwest of the
parcel and the surrounding area consists of residential, agricultural, and timberland
properties. Degradation to the channel and surrounding areas by past agricultural
activities, including channel straightening and planting of row crops up to the channel
edges, allow excessive nutrient and sediment accumulation in the channel. These past
activities have also served to reduce the flood flow attenuation capabilities of the historic
undisturbed channel. Appendix C contains photographs taken during a recent site visit,
showing the degradation of the channel and the proximity of tilled ground. The site is not
located within a FEMA regulated floodplain, therefore floodplain requirements are not
addressed in this restoration plan.
5.1 Soils
Soils examined at several locations throughout the project site in fall of 2004
exhibited strong hydric indicators, including sulfitic odor and deep gray color to a
depth of 18 inches. The majority of the site soils are mapped Bethera loam, with
a small portion mapped Lenoir loam. Bethera loam is a poorly drained, nearly
level soil which exhibits moderately slow to slow permeability and moderate to
high available water capacity. The seasonal high water table is at or within 1 foot
of the surface. Lenoir loam is somewhat poorly drained, nearly level, has slow
permeability, and moderate available water capacity. During wet months, the
seasonal high water table is at a depth of 1 to 2.5 feet.
5.2 Hydrology
The project site is currently bisected by a drainage ditch created when the land
was converted to cropland. The proposed design calls for the ditch to be filled
and a broad flat drainage course to be created to mimic conditions found in
riverine wetlands just below headwater areas. The hydrology of the project
wetlands is to be derived from overbank flooding of the drainage course,
supplemented by a high water table associated with the Bethera soils. The
Bethera loam mapped on the site is classified as hydric with a seasonally high
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC. 3
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
water table and low hydraulic conductivity which allows surface and subsurface
water to be retained for long periods during the growing season. The Hydric
Code for the soil is (1), meaning it is saturated for a significant period during the
growing season. Based on historical accounts from the property owner the area
was wetland prior to being cleared and ditched. Hydrology is similar to
conditions at the reference site and wetland hydrology should be achieved quickly
after the site grading is completed.
5.3 Adjoining Land Uses
The topography of the project site is extremely flat, with slightly lower elevations
on the western side at a tributary of Cooper Swamp. Properties to the east and
northeast of the project site that are within the project site's drainage area are
mapped as agricultural fields or timberland.
5.4 Threatened/Endangered Species and Existing Vegetation
On August 23, 2005 a letter (see Appendix B) was sent by Albemarle
Restorations, LLC to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services
Office requesting a project review for coordination under the Endangered Species
Act, the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.
Albemarle Restorations, LLC received no response. A review of Martin County's
Threatened and Endangered Species list showed only one threatened species, the
Bald Eagle. Neither this species, nor its habitat, is currently found on the project
site.
The only existing vegetation within the project area consists of soybeans grown
for agricultural purposes. The lines of trees that transected the project site, or
"windrows" as Mr. Modlin referred to them, have been cleared. Any native
vegetation present is incidental and on a scale that is not measurable for the
purposes of this report.
5.5 Jurisdictional Wetlands
A letter dated March 23, 2005 (see Appendix B) was received by Mr. Modlin
from the United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources
Conservation Service in Williamston, NC. The letter states that the land in
question was cleared for the planting of crops in the late 1970's, and is designated
as Prior Converted Wetlands, making it exempt from any USDA regulations.
Based upon field investigations and the above referenced Prior Converted ruling,
it is our belief that no jurisdictional wetlands are found on the project site. A
request for a formal Jurisdictional Determination by the COE has been made, and
results of the Determination will be supplied when completed.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC. 4
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
5.6 Historic Preservation
On September 8, 2005 Ecotone, Inc. received a letter (see Appendix B) from the
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation
Office concerning the subject site. The letter states that the above agency is
"aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project."
6.0 Reference Wetlands
Two separate wetlands, one in the Cooper Swamp drainage and the other in the Clark
Mill Creek drainage (a tributary to the Pungo River watershed), were used as reference
sites for this project. Site 1 is approximately 2,000 ft west of the intersection of Poplar
Chapel Rd and the CSX Railroad. This intersection is a'/4 mile south of U.S. Highway
64, 1 mile east of Jamesville, NC. Site 2 is approximately 2,400 ft north of U.S. Route
264 on the Armstrong Property in Ponzer, Hyde County, NC.
Site 1 is in Martin County, North Carolina and was sampled on February 10, 2006. This
is a wetland site typical of a mid-age stand of mixed hardwoods and pine that would be
found in wetlands throughout northeastern North Carolina. Site 2 is in Hyde County, and
is a typical Cypress-Gum Riverine Wetland.
6.1 Hydrological Characterization
The hydrology of site 1 is seasonally or semi-permanently inundated or saturated
during the growing season. At site 2 the hydrology is best characterized as
seasonally flooded or semi-permanently inundated. At both sites, the hydrology
is derived from a combination of a high groundwater table, slow permeability, and
overbank flooding. Microtopography variations create soil conditions at both
sites ranging from inundation up to 18 inches to saturation at a depth of ten
inches.
6.2 Soil Characterization
The soils at site 1 were mapped Bethera loam, 0-2 percent slopes, and poorly
drained. Field observations confirmed this mapped type. A profile of the soils at
site 1 produced the following: Horizon A was found from a depth of 0-6 inches
and was of a loam/organic nature. Horizon B occurred from a depth of 6-11 inches
and was clay/loam in nature with a matrix color of IOYR 511, and mottle colors of
10YR 5/8. Mottles were common in abundance and distinct in contrast. Horizon
132 occurred from a depth of 9-18 inches and was also of a clay/loam nature with
a matrix color of IOYR 511, and mottle colors of IOYR 6/8. Mottles were
common in abundance and distinct in contrast. All colors described at this site are
considered Munsell Moist.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC.
a
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
The soils at reference site 2 were mapped Dorovan muck, 0-1 percent slopes, and
frequently flooded. Field observations confirmed this mapped type. A profile of
the soils at site 2 produced the following: The O Horizon was found from a depth
of 0-3 inches and was of a loam/organic nature. Horizon A occurred from a depth
of 3-9 inches and was silty loam with a matrix color of 10YR 3/1. Horizon B
occurred from a depth of 9 inches on, and was silty clay with a matrix color of
10YR 4/1. Photographs for both reference sites can be found in Appendix C.
6.3 Plant Community Characterization
At site 1, 95 percent of the dominant species were OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-). Vegetation was dense in the shrub and canopy layers, with a
typical understory for this area containing switch cane, pepper bush, and younger
canopy species (red maple, sweet gum). The mid-level canopy was dominated by
younger canopy species and shrub/scrub (sweet bay, wax myrtle). The canopy
included loblolly pine, swamp white oak, water oak, pin oak, and red maple. See
Appendix C for photographs of the site.
At site 2, 100 percent of the dominant species were OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-). The forest type was a middle-age mixed stand with the canopy
dominated by bald cypress, and understory containing sweetgum, red maple,
sweetbay magnolia, American holly, and loblolly pine. The shrub layer contained
sweet bay, highbush blueberry, and fetter-bush with greenbriar and Japanese
honeysuckle. See Appendix C for photographs.
7.0 Wetland Restoration Plan
The goal of the proposed restoration plan is to create a riverine wetland system typically
found in the middle to upper reaches of first order tributary systems. The target plant
community is a Bottomland Hardwood Forest interspersed with shrub/scrub wetland and
shallow open water habitats, which will help provide a continuous forested and diverse
greenway along the tributary. Any invasive or exotic species found on the site while earth
work is being completed will be removed through physical or chemical means.
7.1 Hydrologic Modifications
Hydrologic modifications on the site will be achieved through the filing of the
main ditch bisecting the site and contributing side ditches, and creating a broad
drainage course with a very low gradient (less than 0.5 percent slope) and an
associated low floodplain. Overland flow from the 141-acre drainage area will
inundate the entire area during major flooding events (see Appendix D for the
HEC-RAS analysis of the site), and the seasonally high water table historically
found on the site will maintain saturated soils throughout significant periods
during the growing season.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC.
6
t
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
To add to the retention time of flooding events in the wetland area,
microtopography will be used to create hummocks and depressions found in
undisturbed swamps in the area and two low berm structures have been designed
at the lower end of the system. The outfall from the system is in the center of the
downstream berm structure, and will channel flood flows through a wide outfall
into the existing ditch that will remain at the western edge of the property. A
series of supplemental ditches, located outside the project area, will be installed to
prevent hydrologic trespass onto adjacent cropland.
7.2 Soil Restoration
Soils found in the project area currently exhibit hydric characteristics and will
remain. In areas where grading of more than one and one-half feet is proposed,
soil from the upper horizon will be stockpiled and redistributed prior to
establishing final grade. Because sufficient organic material appears to be present
to a significant depth, no amendments are specified. Large woody debris
encountered in windrows currently within the project area will be placed
throughout the created wetlands to add variety to soil conditions and encourage
diversity of volunteer species.
7.3 Plant Community Restoration
The plant species chosen for the project are native to the area, with an emphasis
on species that will provide habitat and a viable, yearlong food source for a wide
range of animal and plant species. Surrounding areas are home to bear, whitetail
deer, raccoon, squirrel, fox, migrating waterfowl, and a wide variety of amphibian
and reptile species, and the project is intended provide food and habitat to
complement and enhance the existing ecosystem. Hydrophytic species shown on
the planting plan were selected to create a diverse matrix of wetland communities
including Bottomland Hardwood Forest interspersed areas of open water and
emergent wetland. Invasive and exotic species will not be planted on the site.
Any invasive or exotic species found on the site will be removed through physical
or chemical means during the planting phase. In selecting vegetation, we have
considered the reference riverine wetland areas adjacent to the site and "Dominant
Plants for Major Wetland Types" published by the North Carolina Department of
Environment Water Quality Section. Sheet P-2 contains detailed planting and
seeding schedules for the site.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC.
7
4
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
7.4 Plant Material
7.4.1 Planting Specifications
1. Planting material will conform to the current issue of the "American
Standards for Nursery Stock", published by the "American Association of
Nurserymen".
2. The root system of plant material shall be well-developed and
undamaged, and the plant size must conform to the size specified. Plants
not meeting these criteria will be rejected.
3. Foliage of non-dormant plants shall appear healthy, with no leaf spots,
damage, discoloration, or wilting, and no evidence of insects on the plant.
Plants not meeting these criteria will be rejected.
4. Planting materials may be substituted upon written approval from
Albemarle Restorations, LLC.
7.4.2 Storage and Delivery
1. Seed shall be delivered in containers having labels reporting the origin,
purity, and germination percentage of the seed, and the date of
germination testing of the seed.
2. All bare root plants shall be clearly and correctly labeled to allow
confirmation of species and quantities. At least 25% of each species in
every shipment shall have legible labels securely attached prior to delivery
to the site.
3. All plants delivered to the project site must have thoroughly moist
soil/root masses. Dry or light-weight plants shall be rejected.
4. All rejected material shall be immediately removed from the project
site.
5. All plants delivered to the project site shall be stored in a cool, shaded
location, and watered regularly so that roots are kept moist until time of
planting.
7.4.3 Products
1. Planting Schedules specifying quantity, species, size, condition, and
spacing can be found on Sheet P-2 of the Restoration Design Plan Sheets.
2. Straw shall be from small grain species such as wheat or barley, and
shall be free of rot, mildew, and noxious weed seeds.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC.
8
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
7.4.4 Planting Procedures
1. Planting shall be performed in accordance with the current edition of
the Landscape Contractors Association "Landscape Specification
Guidelines" and as specified below.
2. Plants shall be randomly installed within the planting area, using the
plant spacing specified in the plant schedule as a guide.
3. Bare root stock shall be planted during the period of February 1 - April
30. Planting outside of these specified dates is not permissible without
approval from Albemarle Restorations, LLC.
4. Planting shall not occur during periods of sub-freezing temperatures,
when the ground is frozen or excessively wet or dry, or when other
conditions not generally accepted as suitable for planting persist.
5. Bare root stock shall be planted within two days of shipment.
6. Bare root seedlings and whips shall be minimum 1/4" to 1/2" caliper.
7. Bare root seedlings and whips shall be planted in accordance with the
detail provided on Sheet P-2 of the Restoration Design Plan Sheets unless
otherwise approved by Albemarle Restorations, LLC.
8. All woody material must be planted erect. Plants leaning greater than
10 degrees from perpendicular must be straightened or replanted by the
Contractor.
7.4.5 Maintenance and Guarantee
1. Plant material shall be maintained by the Contractor for one full year
from the date of final inspection and acceptance by Albermarle
Restorations, LLC. Maintenance shall include the removal and one-time
replacement of all dead or diseased woody vegetation.
2. The Contractor shall guarantee an 80% survival of all plants for the one
year period stated above, except in the case of damage by fire, animal
damage, vandalism, or other events beyond the Contractors ability to
control.
3. Plants which are 25% dead or more shall be considered dead.
4. Replacement plants shall be of the same type, size, and variety as the
plants specified herein, or substitutions approved by Albermarle
Restorations, LLC. Replacement plants shall be provided and installed
subject to the requirements of these plans and specifications.
7.5 Seeding
7.5.1 Final Grading
1. Prior to seeding, remove any mounds or surface irregularities not in
conformance with grading plan. Areas that have experienced washing out,
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC.
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
rilling, or sediment deposition shall be reconstructed and grades re-
established by the Contractor in accordance with the plan or as otherwise
directed by Albemarle Restorations, LLC.
2. After bringing the wetland creation area to final grades, loosen soil by
discing or scarifying to a depth of at least 3 inches.
3. Prior to seeding, remove all trash, debris and large objects such as
stones that might interfere with the seeding operation.
4. Seeding of wetland areas is to be according to the Wetland Seed Mix
detail on Sheet P-2 of the Restoration Design Plan Sheets. Seed shall be
spread with a broadcast spreader and may be mixed with dry sand to
facilitate even spreading.
7.5.2 Soil Amendments
1. Soil tests must be performed to determine if lime and/or fertilizer are
required within seeding areas. Soil analysis may be performed by the
N.C. Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Agronomic
Division or a recognized commercial laboratory.
2. Amend soil as needed based on N.C. Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services Agronomic Division recommendations.
7.5.3 Seedbed Preparation
1. Seedbed preparation shall consist of loosening soil to a depth of 3-5"
by means of suitable agricultural or construction equipment such as disc
harrows or chisel plows or rippers mounted in construction equipment.
After the soil is loosened it should not be rolled or dragged smooth but left
in the roughened condition. Sloped areas (Exceeding 3:1) should be
tracked leaving an irregular surface with ridges running parallel to the
contour of the slope.
2. Apply fertilizer and lime if required.
3. If required, incorporate lime and fertilizer into the top 3-5" of soil by
disking or other suitable means.
7.5.4 Seed Specification
All seed shall be free of noxious weeds. All seed shall be subject to re-
testing by a recognized seed laboratory. All seed shall have been tested
within the 6 months immediately preceding the date of sowing such
materials on this job. Seed tags shall be made available to the inspector to
verify type and rate of seed used.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC. 10
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
7.5.5 Methods of Seeding
1. Dry seeding: This includes use of conventional drop or broadcast
spreaders.
a) Seed spread dry shall be incorporated into the subsoil at the rates
prescribed on the temporary or permanent seeding summaries or tables 25
or 26. The seeded areas shall then be rolled with a weighted roller to
provide good seed to soil contact.
b) Where practical, seed should be applied in two directions perpendicular
to each other. Apply half the seeding rate in each direction.
2. Drill or cultipacker seeding: Mechanized seeders that apply and cover
seed with soil.
a) Cultipacking seeders are required to bury the seed in such a fashion as
to provide at least 1 /4 inch of soil covering. Seedbed must be firm after
planting.
b) Where practical, seed should be applied in two directions perpendicular
to each other. Apply half the seeding rate in each direction.
8.0 Monitoring
Monitoring plots will be installed and permanently monumented upon completion of
plant installation. A minimum of one sampling quadrant will be located within each
proposed vegetative community. Piezometers will be installed to measure subsurface
water levels during the five-year monitoring period. Following construction, a Mitigation
Plan and As Built Drawings will be prepared for the site and submitted to EEP. The
Mitigation Plan will include the monitoring plan and protocol, as well as an invasive and
exotic species management plan. The management plan will identify potential invasive
species as defined in the "North Carolina Noxious Weed List", identify site constraints,
and provide for a two-part control plan. The first part of the two-part plan will suppress
the establishment of noxious plants through eradication of existing species seen on site
and installation of sufficient densities of native woody and herbaceous species. The
second part will be to implement an early detection and rapid response program, to
identify and remove invasive species before they become established.
Monitoring will be completed using random permanent sampling quadrants as outlined in
the Mitigation Plan for a minimum five-year period, or until success of the project can be
validated. Monitoring Reports will be submitted to EEP by December 31 of the year in
which the monitoring was conducted. In the unlikely event that success criteria outlined
below are not achieved by the end of the five-year minimum monitoring period, with
permission from EEP corrective measures including regrading, replanting, removal of
certain species, etc. will be performed. If areas are deemed to be severely deficient in
meeting the success criteria, Albemarle Restoration, LLC may opt to ask the Department
to allow corrective measures prior to the end of the five-year period.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC. 11
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina- February 2006
Revised, May 2006
9.0 Success Criteria:
Success of the project will go beyond the establishment of wetland hydrology and a
predominance of hydrophytic vegetation. Because the goals of the project are to create a
diverse wetland system, the success criteria will be tied directly to those goals. The
intent of the project is to create a diverse wetland forest, interspersed with small areas of
emergent wetlands, shallow open water, and hummocks. We believe that the creation of
this diverse system is necessary to provide the range of intended functions and values.
The primary indicators of success will therefore be the establishment of a range of
wetland hydrology including inundated, saturated, seasonally saturated, and upland
hummock areas. Approximate acreages for each wetland hydrologic regime are shown
on Sheet P-1 of the Restoration Design Plan Sheets. The site will be deemed successful
if the acreages of each regimes fall within a reasonable range related to the design during
normal climatic conditions. Site hydrology during years of excessive rainfall or extreme
drought will be assessed with climatic conditions in mind.
10.0 References
Albemarle Restorations, LLC. . Albemarle Restorations field data collection
within Martin County, North Carolina. 2005.
American Association of Nurserymen. The American Standard for Nursery Stock. 1250
I Street, N.W., Suite 500, Washington, DC. 1986.
Landscape Contractor's Association of Metropolitan Washington. Landscape
Specification Guidelines. LCAMW. Rockville, Maryland. 1993.
Lynch, Karen M. "Common Wetland Plants of North Carolina." NCDENR, Division of
Parks and Recreation Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality Water Quality Section. Raleigh, North Carolina:
Report # 97-01, August 1997.
McGill, S. "Technical Proposal Bid Number 16-DO5024 Modlin Property."
Albermarle Restorations, LLC. Gatesville, North Carolina. 2005.
North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Plant Industry
Division-Plant Protection Section. "North Carolina Noxious Weed List."
http://www.agr.state.nc.us/plantind/plant/weed/noxweed.htm. September 2005.
NCDENR, Division of Coastal Management. "GIS Wetland Type Mapping for the North
Carolina Coastal Plain." GIS Data Guidance Document.
http://dcm2.enr.state.nc.us/Wetlands/wtypetuidanceweb.pdf. September 2005.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC. 12
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources(NCDENR), Division
of Water Quality. "Roanoke River Basinwide Water Quality Management Plan."
July, 2001.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, NCDENR, Division of Parks and Recreation.
"Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Animal Species of North Carolina."
1999.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, NCDENR, Division of Parks and Recreation.
"Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Plant Species of North Carolina."
1999.
North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program. "Watershed
Restoration Plan for the Roanoke River Basin." North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR), Division of Water Quality.
2001.
Riddick, Lisa A. "Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Modlin Property, Poplar
Chapel Road Jamesville, Martin County, North Carolina." NorthEast
Environmental, P.C. October 10, 2005.
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service.
"Martin County Soil Survey." September, 1989.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service. "Martin County Endangered Species,
Threatened Species, and Federal Species of Concern." http://nc-
es.fws.gov/es/cntylist/martin.html. September 2005.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC. 13
j 141.E
it
R iROrmAm
June 13, 2006
Albemarle Restorations, LLC
Attn: Ed Temple
404 Court Street
Gatesville, North Carolina 27938
Subject: Modlin Property Wetland Restoration Plan
Roanoke River Basin - Cataloging Unit 03010107
Martin County
Contract # D05024-1
Dear Mr. Temple:
In May 2006, Albemarle Restorations, LLC submitted the subject Restoration Plan for the
Modlin Property Wetland Restoration Full Delivery Project. The project is located off Poplar
Chapel Road near the Town of Jmesville in Martin County, North Carolina. The Restoration
Plan proposes to restore 40.0 acres of prior converted cropland by restoring wetland hydrology
and planting appropriate vegetation to establish a bottomland hardwood forest. The restored
system will mimic the conditions found in riverine wetlands just below headwater areas.
The Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) has reviewed the restoration plan and has no
comments at this time. Please proceed with acquiring all necessary permits and/or certifications
and complete the implementation of the earthwork portion of the mitigation project (Task 4).
If you have any questions, or wish to discuss this matter further, please contact me at (919)715-
1656 or email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Guy C. Pearce
EEP Full Delivery Program Supervisor
cc: files
L..-01 't'lA dib/ ... Pri?' t ezt l: U? 0 6/19 r Ral a M ?A
Uw'I States Oepa bumf of Agrica tune
o BRCS
Natural Resources Conservatlon'SeMce
104 Kehukee Park Road
Willtamston, N.C. 27892
March 23, 2005
Mr. William N. Modlin
1841 Poplar Chapel Road
Jamesville, NC 27846
Dear Billy,
I have reviewed the soils maps on your tract 2087 of Poplar Chapel Road as it
relates to wetland classifications within USDA. The acreage proposed for the
conservation easement is comprised of Bethera loam soil and was cleared for
row crops in the late 1970's prior to the swampbuster provision's of the 1985
Food Security Act. Therefore this area of approximately 120 acres is classed as
Prior Converted Wetlands (PC) and is exempt from any USDA regulations.
Good luck on the wildlife enhanpements that may be planned.
Sincerely,
vv
Rtup W. Hasty
District Conservationist
USDA - NRCS
encl: Soils Map
Tract Map
156 EZ
The Natural Resources Conservation Service provides leadership In a partnership effort to help people
conserve, maintain, and improve our natural resources and environment.
0d0 v
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
P B. SoWbc*. A&WAMM or office of Archives and History
Michael Easley, Governor Division of Historic id Rem=
I.isbetit C. Evans, Secretary David Brook, Director
Jeffrey I Crow, Deputy Sac ofary
September 8, 2005
Scott McGill
Ecotone, Inc
PO Box 5
Jarrettsville, MD 21084
Re: Moulin Property, Cooper Swamp Fame, Martin County, ER05-2015
Dear Mr. McGill;-
Thank you for your letter of August 25, 2005s concerning the above project"
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
ThanIc you for your cooperation and considemfion. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, enta review coordinator, at 919-733-4763. In all future
number
communication concerning this project, pieces cite the above-referenced ttackwg n
Sincerely,
P er Sandbeck
- ?_ 8mvioe GeoDnr.ltakigb NC 27699" 617 17 (919(919)733-4763!733-"Dj
13517.4
507 NM tBoad l?rsat. Rata 1 4617 4617 MA 7
4WI Sarioe Carter Rdd# NC X169946E01
AW41NISTRATION RESTORATION 513 N. Blwnt Starer. Rd do NC 46171 A?it Snvioe Ot+ttMr: Raleigh 11C 27 9L"17 (419))M45733654451715-48Q1
SURVEY & PLANNING 515 N. Blond Sheet. Rdeizk Me

Q
o
m
?o
4VI

? I
O
?
?, N
Fp,GP
Q" ? ???

i ?

i
I
/ I

?
I I

_l -
- - MAIry sr I
64 JAMESVILLE EWAH LEE RD o\
?
COOPER - c4 ?I?UA ?Z?
M -.
PROJECT AREA
SW p---- o J
_
a / I I R?
u II II ?
?- -_ F,?o H
ry \ h II I

I

NIE

SCALE
0 40W 8000
EXHIBIT A
ECOTONE, INC Vicinity Map
MODUN PROPERTY
RIVERINE WETLAND RESTORATION 40 WMU's
P.O. Box s • 1204 Baldwin Mill Rood - jamettsvllk, M.ryi.nd 210x+ Scale: 1" = 4000' 1/2005 Drawn By: LMS
[phone] • Fax [phone] • E-Mail infolaotonsinumn
Z

m
N
?
M
'C B gg
2 Q d'

CD •a?

*le m C
m •0
w

x y

C p .Q
oil l

do
•?u
J -

'Ac
-30
g A S E -
10-4 Z

0

g O

P
00
C p
?? ? Z e

?ZZ Z

8

'g SJ ?'Ua?oe$

??tQ (?
WZWPN Jill,

cp
n.601?L
LLJ

Z

z
O
Q
hp I N?ma E$?£L..
a
o

W `
I__I? 0 i
m

U a
Z
?,y
W

J
? n

yC

? W

o
LU

tJ c,
CG
N
3
W
W
W
N

O

o
a

J Z
G
0 C
ss 9
= $

N d t
i o
..,gyp v
z U

^

1+ UJ
? fV
n
d v
Z
Ur)
O ? W ? W
(i
'l ? E
*l ? ?
4 p? Z
S 5
0
""' 1
? d
til .c ?

U

U al
?
? 0
T
Z

- a' ? V
- u

3
?
LM
8
N
11

op?l
r\

m?
1•T?r `L, w'?N
? } Y

y

-

•
y ty t
Af?

Y i
W

O
Ir
?

Cf)

W
AlE i .
z?
r--? o
w

fo'
C
W
rO
F--1
Fri
r?
F-?1
f n

:v?
U4 t

'"'d 94 ? ?y'r yy ?A 1

h, l?r ;e?W^t y c
Yi ` t W ?

Y
'
u j
i!
(. ?' F r
w .?
K'
f??y O .r ? .1 Z!S
a

Exhibit D

3 E

? t€
t
i 11? J
i , i
r{:: i• y' SVR'
r �
� .
►
11 in
,
�''�r �
_
P
W

Photo 4: Wooded parcel adjacent to Riverine Wetland Restoration Area.
" ECOTONE, Inc.
FOREST AND WETLAND CREATION
RIVER RESTORATION
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING AND PERMITTING
PONDS AND STREAMS
CONSTRUCTION
June 14, 2006
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
401 Unit Supervisor
2321 Crab Tree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27699
RE: Modlin Property Wetland Restoration
Dear Ms. Karoly:
Ecotone, Inc., on behalf of our client, Albemarle Restorations, LLC, is requesting 401
State Water Quality Certification to restore 40 acres of riverine wetlands on the Modlin
Property, located on Poplar Chapel Road near Jamesville, in Martin County, North
Carolina.
Albemarle Restorations, LLC has contracted with the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem Enhancement Program to restore 40
acres of prior converted cropland. The project involves minor grading and shaping to
restore wetland hydrology as well as an extensive planting plan. A variety of wetland
types, including bottomland hardwood, scrub shrub, and emergent wetland types are
proposed to maximize habitat diversity. A conservation easement has been recorded to
protect the constructed wetlands in perpetuity. A small ditch traverses the center of the
project area and carries intermittent flow across the property. This ditch will be
temporarily impacted by the proposed grading activities. The foot print of the ditch will
be converted to vegetated nontidal wetlands.
We anticipate the Corps of Engineers will verify that the project is authorized under the
Nationwide Permit #27, Wetland and Riparian Restoration and Creation, and therefore
qualifies for General Water Quality Certification GC3495.
Enclosed please find seven (7) copies of the following:
• Completed Pre-Construction Notification Application Form;
• Wetland Restoration Plan Narrative;
• Wetland Restoration Plan Sheets;
• EEP Approval Letter;
• USDA-NRCS Prior Converted Wetlands Letter;
• Letter from the State Historical and Preservation Office;
• Exhibit A - Vicinity Map;
P.O. BOX 5, 12Q4 BALDWIN MILL ROAD
JARRETTSVILLE, MARYLAND 21084 D \?VII 1l
[phone]
FAX [phone] '??Iry 1 `jl)l1?
--.rte .ufro? xtlb ?T
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Modlin Property Wetland Restoration
June 14, 2006
Page 2 of 2
• Exhibit B - Project Area in Relation to Sub-basin;
• Exhibit C - Project Area in Relation to Existing Forests; and
• Exhibit D - Photographs.
Thank you for taking the time to review this application and please contact me if you
have any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
;Ec o to e, Inc.
ott McGill
Principal
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 1
(it any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 27
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information (=3 ?_.,?V
D Lam,. .
1. Owner/Applicant Information JUN 1 ? Z006
Name: Albemarle Restorations
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 204 WATER QP.AU9-ww
Gatesville NC 27938 WETL"Sf N°
Contact: Mr. Scott McGill
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: smc ig l?ecotoneinc.com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Mr. Scott McGill
Company Affiliation: Ecotone Inc.
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 5,1204 Baldwin Mill Road
Jarrettsville MD 21084
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: smcgill(a,ecotoneinc.com
Page 5 of 13
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Modlin Property Wetland Restoration
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0102371
4. Location
County: Martin Nearest Town: Jamesville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): NA
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Located on Poplar Chapel
Road near Jamesville, in Martin County, North Carolina
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35°47'55.16" °N 76°51'32.87" °W
6. Property size (acres): Approximately 159 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Cooper Swamp
8. River Basin:
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enE.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is currently used for agricultural pqWoses
Page 6 of 13
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
project will restore 40 acres of riverine wetlands with a mix of bottomland hardwood, scrub
shrub and emergent wetland types The restoration plans have been developed based on
reference wetlands The project will involve minor grading and shaping, averaging less than
1 foot of cut/fill to restore wetland hydrology to the agricultural fields. Equipment that will
be used on site during construction may include excavators dozers, loaders, track trucks, and
other standard excavation equipment
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The baseline goals of the project are to create
wetland hydrology and establish a viable community of wetland vegetation throughout the
project area The target plant community is a Bottomland Hardwood Forest interspersed with
shrub/scrub wetland and shallow open water habitats which will help provide a continuous
forested and diverse greenway along the tributary Mitigation credits generated will be
utilized by the Ecosystem Enhancement Program to offset compensatory mitigation
requirements with Roanoke River Basin Cataloging unit 03010107.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.N/A
The project area is prior converted cropland See attached letter from NRCS.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No the project site is protected in perpetuity through the recordation of a conservation easement
in the Land Records of Martin County North Carolina.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
Page 7 of 13
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The existing ditch acting as a
stream is to be filled to create the desired hydrophytic conditions present in a diverse wetland
system Impacts to the ditch will be temporary since the ditch area will be converted to
wetlands.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
se aratel list impacts due to both structure and floodin .
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
es/no Distance to
Nearest
Stream
linear feet Area of
Impact
(acres)
NONE

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma Before Impact linear feet acres

I Ditch draining to Conversion to
Wetlands
Intermittent 7.5 if
+/- 2,950 if
+/- .5 ac
Cooper Swamp (temporary)
Page 8 of 13
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) I +/- 2,950 if I +1-_.5 ac
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill. excavation. dredQine. flooding. drainaue, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc. Area of
Impact
acres
NONE

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Im act (acres): +1-.5
Wetland Impact acres : 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) +1-.5
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): +/-2,950
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
Page 9 of 13
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The proposed impacts are
temporary and beneficial to the wetland resource and its watershed. The project will restore
wetland hydrology to 40 acres of prior converted cropland. The conversion of ditch to wetland
will reduce erosion enhance nutrient uptake and provide beneficial wildlife habitat.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
Page 10 of 13
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The proposed project will create 40 acres of Riverine Wetlands within the Roanoke River
Basin A conservation easement will preserve the site in,perpetuity See Modlin Site
Riverine Wetland Project for specific details and information.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Page 11 of 13
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact I Multiplier I Required
f--- c e«' ra ,,.; ..,
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. N/A No proposed impervious surfaces.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Page 12 of 13
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: The
project is designed to increase the quality of water downstream of the site.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Page 13 of 13
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Modlin Property Restoration Plan Narrative
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................1
2.0 Project Goals and Objectives ..............................................................2
3.0 Site Location .........................................................................................2
4.0 General Watershed Description ...........................................................2
5.0 Existing Site Conditions ...................................................................3
5.1 Soils .............................................................................................................3
5.2 Hydrology ............................................................................
5.3 Adjoining Land Uses ...............................................................4
5.4 Threatened/Endangered Species and Existing Vegetation ....................4
5.5 Jurisdictional Wetlands ..............................................................
5.6 Historic Preservation .................................................................
6.0 Reference Wetlands .........................................................................5
6.1 Hydrological Characterization .................................................. .5
6.2 Soil Characterization ............................................................. ..5
6.3 Plant Community Characterization ..............................................6
7.0 Wetland Restoration Plan .................................................................6
7.1 Hydrologic Modifications .........................................................6
7.2 Soil Restoration ................................................................... ..7
7.3 Plant Community Restoration ................................................... ..
7.4 Plant Material ..................................................................... ..8
7.4.1 Planting Specifications ....................................................8
7.4.2 Storage and Delivery ......................................................8
7.4.3 Products .....................................................................8
7.4.4 Planting Procedures ...................................................... ..9
7.4.5 Maintenance and Guarantee ..............................................9
7.5 Seeding ..............................................................................9
7.5.1 Final Grading ...............................................................9
7.5.2 Soil Amendment ............................................................. 10
7.5.3 Seedbed Preparation ...................................................... 10
7.5.4 Seed Specification ........................................................ 10
7.5.5 Method of Seeding ....................................................... 11
8.0 Monitoring ................................................................................. 11
9.0 Success Criteria .......................................................................... 12
10.0 References .................................................................................. 12
11.0 Restoration Plan Sheets ................................................................. 14
Appendix A - Figures
Appendix B - Supporting Documents
Recorded Easement
USDA Exemption
Historic Preservation
Threatened/Endangered Species
Appendix C - Photographs
Appendix D - Hydraulic and Hydrolgic Analysis (H&H Study)
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC.
a
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation
1.0 Introduction
The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem
Enhancement Program has selected 40 acres of the property owned by William Nathan
Modlin for wetland restoration to fulfill a portion of the Request for Proposals: Full
Delivery Project Roanoke River Basin. The purpose of the RFP is to provide
compensatory stream, wetland and/or buffer mitigation within the Roanoke River Basin
Catologing Unit 03010107. The Request for Proposal has been designated RFP 16-
D05024 and the closing date for the request was February 17, 2005. Albemarle
Restorations, LLC entered into a contract with the State of North Carolina on June 27,
2005 to deliver 40 wetland mitigation units within this project site (Contract No. D05024-
1).
Albemarle Restorations, LLC proposes to create 40 acres of riverine wetlands (40
Wetland Mitigation Units) on the Modlin Property, located on Poplar Chapel Road near
Jamesville, in Martin County, North Carolina. The project site is in the above referenced
watershed and is in close proximity to Cooper Swamp. In addition, the site is within 1.5
miles of the Roanoke River and is within the required 5-year floodprone area.
The site has been chosen in part because of its location in a targeted watershed and
because it provides the opportunity to add contiguous wetland forest to the extensive and
diverse Roanoke River floodplain forest. The project's location in the Lower Roanoke
River Sub-basin (Sub-basin 03-02-09) allow the 40 acres to be placed in a conservation
easement to join more than 55,000 acres of protected land in the watershed, including
34,000 acres of publicly owned land and 21,000 acres of timberland under conservation
management. In addition, the project is located in a watershed upstream from the
Roanoke River (Sub-basin 03-02-09), which is listed on the North Carolina 303(d) List
of impaired waterways. The Lower Roanoke River Sub-basin is also one of seven
priority targets for The Nature Conservancy in North Carolina. This project site has been
selected because of the soils present, and a very shallow depth to groundwater (indicated
by extensive past ditching). Previous site visits have revealed high water marks from
frequent overbank flooding and widespread wet soil conditions. These factors indicate
that minimal grading will be necessary, and that the desired hydrophytic vegetation to be
planted will thrive.
An unnamed tributary to Cooper Swamp flows through the property, which is currently
used for agricultural purposes with very little native vegetation present. The conversion
of this site from agricultural use to established riverine wetlands will create a
nearly unbroken forested buffer along the entire tributary, making this a practical and
environmentally beneficial restoration project.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC. 1
I
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
2.0 Project Goals and Objectives
The restoration plans have been developed based on reference wetlands and utilizing the
50 years of combined wetland restoration experience brought forth by the principals of
Albemarle Restorations, LLC. The baseline goals of the project are to create wetland
hydrology and establish a viable community of wetland vegetation throughout the project
area. Beyond that, the goals and objectives are as follows:
1) Provide floodflow attenuation.
2) Water Quality improvement through sediment, toxicant, and nutrient retention
and reduction.
3) Slow over bank flow rates and provide storage and desynchronization of flood
waters.
4) Alleviate downstream flooding issues by lessening the effect of pulse or
flashy flows.
5) Provide shading through forest cover to reduce algae growth and associated
low dissolved oxygen levels in surface water moving through the site.
6) The production and export of food sources.
7) The creation of wildlife habitat and recreational opportunities.
3.0 Site Location
The 40-acre project site is located in the center of the Modlin property, also known as
Cooper Swamp Farm, in the Deep Run Swamp Watershed (USGS Catalog Unit
03010107150010), a Targeted Local Watershed in the 2001 "Watershed Restoration Plan
for the Roanoke River Basin" released by the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program. The restoration site lies along the mid and upper reaches of an unnamed
tributary to Cooper Swamp found on the +/- 159-acre Modlin property. The site is
accessed from Poplar Chapel Road, south of Jamesville, via and existing farm lane
serving the Modlin and adjoining properties. Figure 1 is a vicinity map found in
Appendix A. Downstream from the site, the tributary runs almost entirely through
wooded areas containing extensive wetlands before joining the main stem of Cooper
Swamp. Above the site, the headwaters and upper reaches of the tributary are located in
forested and forested wetland areas. The tributary and the proximity of the site to nearby
forested areas on the most recent available GIS air photos of the area are shown on
Figure 2 in Appendix A.
4.0 General Watershed Description
The project site is located in Targeted Local Watershed 50010, Deep Swamp Run, which
lies in Sub-basin 03-02-09, the Lower Roanoke River. The following information was
extrapolated from the "Watershed Restoration Plan for the Roanoke River Basin, 2001."
Forested land constitutes 71% of the land in Sub-basin 03-02-09, while 25% is
agricultural in this 559 square mile area through which the lower 83 miles of the Roanoke
River and its tributaries flow. In 1990 the population in this sub-basin was estimated at
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC. 2
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina- February 2006
Revised, May 2006
58,886 people. Channelized headwaters of Deep Swamp Run have led to critical habitat
loss in the watershed which is bordered by broad floodplain forests (DWQ, 2001). Deep
Run Swamp is not within a DWQ water Supply Watershed, is not a Designated High
Quality or Outstanding Resource Water, and has no presence of the Aquatic Natural
Heritage Element.
5.0 Existing Site Conditions
The Modlin farm consists of approximately 159 +/- acres, 40 of which are designated for
this project site. These 40 acres are located within the central portion of the farm. This
area is bisected by a deep drainage ditch that runs southwest from the property boundary,
then curves toward the northwest, extending to the western property line, and is currently
bordered by agricultural fields of the remaining Modlin farm to the north, south, and
west, and timberland to the east. The Modlin residence is located to the northwest of the
parcel and the surrounding area consists of residential, agricultural, and timberland
properties. Degradation to the channel and surrounding areas by past agricultural
activities, including channel straightening and planting of row crops up to the channel
edges, allow excessive nutrient and sediment accumulation in the channel. These past
activities have also served to reduce the flood flow attenuation capabilities of the historic
undisturbed channel. Appendix C contains photographs taken during a recent site visit,
showing the degradation of the channel and the proximity of tilled ground. The site is not
located within a FEMA regulated floodplain, therefore floodplain requirements are not
addressed in this restoration plan.
5.1 Soils
Soils examined at several locations throughout the project site in fall of 2004
exhibited strong hydric indicators, including sulfitic odor and deep gray color to a
depth of 18 inches. The majority of the site soils are mapped Bethera loam, with
a small portion mapped Lenoir loam. Bethera loam is a poorly drained, nearly
level soil which exhibits moderately slow to slow permeability and moderate to
high available water capacity. The seasonal high water table is at or within 1 foot
of the surface. Lenoir loam is somewhat poorly drained, nearly level, has slow
permeability, and moderate available water capacity. During wet months, the
seasonal high water table is at a depth of 1 to 2.5 feet.
5.2 Hydrology
The project site is currently bisected by a drainage ditch created when the land
was converted to cropland. The proposed design calls for the ditch to be filled
and a broad flat drainage course to be created to mimic conditions found in
riverine wetlands just below headwater areas. The hydrology of the project
wetlands is to be derived from overbank flooding of the drainage course,
supplemented by a high water table associated with the Bethera soils. The
Bethera loam mapped on the site is classified as hydric with a seasonally high
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC. 3
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
water table and low hydraulic conductivity which allows surface and subsurface
water to be retained for long periods during the growing season. The Hydric
Code for the soil is (1), meaning it is saturated for a significant period during the
growing season. Based on historical accounts from the property owner the area
was wetland prior to being cleared and ditched. Hydrology is similar to
conditions at the reference site and wetland hydrology should be achieved quickly
after the site grading is completed.
5.3 Adjoining Land Uses
The topography of the project site is extremely flat, with slightly lower elevations
on the western side at a tributary of Cooper Swamp. Properties to the east and
northeast of the project site that are within the project site's drainage area are
mapped as agricultural fields or timberland.
5.4 Threatened/Endangered Species and Existing Vegetation
On August 23, 2005 a letter (see Appendix B) was sent by Albemarle
Restorations, LLC to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services
Office requesting a project review for coordination under the Endangered Species
Act, the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.
Albemarle Restorations, LLC received no response. A review of Martin County's
Threatened and Endangered Species list showed only one threatened species, the
Bald Eagle. Neither this species, nor its habitat, is currently found on the project
site.
The only existing vegetation within the project area consists of soybeans grown
for agricultural purposes. The lines of trees that transected the project site, or
"windrows" as Mr. Modlin referred to them, have been cleared. Any native
vegetation present is incidental and on a scale that is not measurable for the
purposes of this report.
5.5 Jurisdictional Wetlands
A letter dated March 23, 2005 (see Appendix B) was received by Mr. Modlin
from the United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources
Conservation Service in Williamston, NC. The letter states that the land in
question was cleared for the planting of crops in the late 1970's, and is designated
as Prior Converted Wetlands, making it exempt from any USDA regulations.
Based upon field investigations and the above referenced Prior Converted ruling,
it is our belief that no jurisdictional wetlands are found on the project site. A
request for a formal Jurisdictional Determination by the COE has been made, and
results of the Determination will be supplied when completed.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC. 4
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
5.6 Historic Preservation
On September 8, 2005 Ecotone, Inc. received a letter (see Appendix B) from the
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation
Office concerning the subject site. The letter states that the above agency is
"aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project."
6.0 Reference Wetlands
Two separate wetlands, one in the Cooper Swamp drainage and the other in the Clark
Mill Creek drainage (a tributary to the Pungo River watershed), were used as reference
sites for this project. Site 1 is approximately 2,000 ft west of the intersection of Poplar
Chapel Rd and the CSX Railroad. This intersection is a t/4 mile south of U.S. Highway
64, 1 mile east of Jamesville, NC. Site 2 is approximately 2,400 ft north of U.S. Route
264 on the Armstrong Property in Ponzer, Hyde County, NC.
Site 1 is in Martin County, North Carolina and was sampled on February 10, 2006. This
is a wetland site typical of a mid-age stand of mixed hardwoods and pine that would be
found in wetlands throughout northeastern North Carolina. Site 2 is in Hyde County, and
is a typical Cypress-Gum Riverine Wetland.
6.1 Hydrological Characterization
The hydrology of site 1 is seasonally or semi-permanently inundated or saturated
during the growing season. At site 2 the hydrology is best characterized as
seasonally flooded or semi-permanently inundated. At both sites, the hydrology
is derived from a combination of a high groundwater table, slow permeability, and
overbank flooding. Microtopography variations create soil conditions at both
sites ranging from inundation up to 18 inches to saturation at a depth of ten
inches.
6.2 Soil Characterization
The soils at site 1 were mapped Bethera loam, 0-2 percent slopes, and poorly
drained. Field observations confirmed this mapped type. A profile of the soils at
site 1 produced the following: Horizon A was found from a depth of 0-6 inches
and was of a loam/organic nature. Horizon B occurred from a depth of 6-11 inches
and was clay/loam in nature with a matrix color of IOYR 511, and mottle colors of
10YR 5/8. Mottles were common in abundance and distinct in contrast. Horizon
132 occurred from a depth of 9-18 inches and was also of a clay/loam nature with
a matrix color of IOYR 5/1, and mottle colors of 10YR 6/8. Mottles were
common in abundance and distinct in contrast. All colors described at this site are
considered Munsell Moist.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC.
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
The soils at reference site 2 were mapped Dorovan muck, 0-1 percent slopes, and
frequently flooded. Field observations confirmed this mapped type. A profile of
the soils at site 2 produced the following: The O Horizon was found from a depth
of 0-3 inches and was of a loam/organic nature. Horizon A occurred from a depth
of 3-9 inches and was silty loam with a matrix color of 10YR 3/1. Horizon B
occurred from a depth of 9 inches on, and was silty clay with a matrix color of
l OYR 4/1. Photographs for both reference sites can be found in Appendix C.
6.3 Plant Community Characterization
At site 1, 95 percent of the dominant species were OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-). Vegetation was dense in the shrub and canopy layers, with a
typical understory for this area containing switch cane, pepper bush, and younger
canopy species (red maple, sweet gum). The mid-level canopy was dominated by
younger canopy species and shrub/scrub (sweet bay, wax myrtle). The canopy
included loblolly pine, swamp white oak, water oak, pin oak, and red maple. See
Appendix C for photographs of the site.
At site 2, 100 percent of the dominant species were OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-). The forest type was a middle-age mixed stand with the canopy
dominated by bald cypress, and understory containing sweetgum, red maple,
sweetbay magnolia, American holly, and loblolly pine. The shrub layer contained
sweet bay, highbush blueberry, and fetter-bush with greenbriar and Japanese
honeysuckle. See Appendix C for photographs.
7.0 Wetland Restoration Plan
The goal of the proposed restoration plan is to create a riverine wetland system typically
found in the middle to upper reaches of first order tributary systems. The target plant
community is a Bottomland Hardwood Forest interspersed with shrub/scrub wetland and
shallow open water habitats, which will help provide a continuous forested and diverse
greenway along the tributary. Any invasive or exotic species found on the site while earth
work is being completed will be removed through physical or chemical means.
7.1 Hydrologic Modifications
Hydrologic modifications on the site will be achieved through the filing of the
main ditch bisecting the site and contributing side ditches, and creating a broad
drainage course with a very low gradient (less than 0.5 percent slope) and an
associated low floodplain. Overland flow from the 141-acre drainage area will
inundate the entire area during major flooding events (see Appendix D for the
HEC-RAS analysis of the site), and the seasonally high water table historically
found on the site will maintain saturated soils throughout significant periods
during the growing season.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC.
Modlin Property Riverine Wetiand Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina- February 2006
Revised, May 2006
To add to the retention time of flooding events in the wetland area,
microtopography will be used to create hummocks and depressions found in
undisturbed swamps in the area and two low berm structures have been designed
at the lower end of the system. The outfall from the system is in the center of the
downstream berm structure, and will channel flood flows through a wide outfall
into the existing ditch that will remain at the western edge of the property. A
series of supplemental ditches, located outside the project area, will be installed to
prevent hydrologic trespass onto adjacent cropland.
7.2 Soil Restoration
Soils found in the project area currently exhibit hydric characteristics and will
remain. In areas where grading of more than one and one-half feet is proposed,
soil from the upper horizon will be stockpiled and redistributed prior to
establishing final grade. Because sufficient organic material appears to be present
to a significant depth, no amendments are specified. Large woody debris
encountered in windrows currently within the project area will be placed
throughout the created wetlands to add variety to soil conditions and encourage
diversity of volunteer species.
7.3 Plant Community Restoration
The plant species chosen for the project are native to the area, with an emphasis
on species that will provide habitat and a viable, yearlong food source for a wide
range of animal and plant species. Surrounding areas are home to bear, whitetail
deer, raccoon, squirrel, fox, migrating waterfowl, and a wide variety of amphibian
and reptile species, and the project is intended provide food and habitat to
complement and enhance the existing ecosystem. Hydrophytic species shown on
the planting plan were selected to create a diverse matrix of wetland communities
including Bottomland Hardwood Forest interspersed areas of open water and
emergent wetland. Invasive and exotic species will not be planted on the site.
Any invasive or exotic species found on the site will be removed through physical
or chemical means during the planting phase. In selecting vegetation, we have
considered the reference riverine wetland areas adjacent to the site and "Dominant
Plants for Major Wetland Types" published by the North Carolina Department of
Environment Water Quality Section. Sheet P-2 contains detailed planting and
seeding schedules for the site.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC.
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
7.4 Plant Material
7.4.1 Planting Specifications
1. Planting material will conform to the current issue of the "American
Standards for Nursery Stock", published by the "American Association of
Nurserymen".
2. The root system of plant material shall be well-developed and
undamaged, and the plant size must conform to the size specified. Plants
not meeting these criteria will be rejected.
3. Foliage of non-dormant plants shall appear healthy, with no leaf spots,
damage, discoloration, or wilting, and no evidence of insects on the plant.
Plants not meeting these criteria will be rejected.
4. Planting materials may be substituted upon written approval from
Albemarle Restorations, LLC.
7.4.2 Storage and Delivery
1. Seed shall be delivered in containers having labels reporting the origin,
purity, and germination percentage of the seed, and the date of
germination testing of the seed.
2. All bare root plants shall be clearly and correctly labeled to allow
confirmation of species and quantities. At least 25% of each species in
every shipment shall have legible labels securely attached prior to delivery
to the site.
3. All plants delivered to the project site must have thoroughly moist
soil/root masses. Dry or light-weight plants shall be rejected.
4. All rejected material shall be immediately removed from the project
site.
5. All plants delivered to the project site shall be stored in a cool, shaded
location, and watered regularly so that roots are kept moist until time of
planting.
7.4.3 Products
1. Planting Schedules specifying quantity, species, size, condition, and
spacing can be found on Sheet P-2 of the Restoration Design Plan Sheets.
2. Straw shall be from small grain species such as wheat or barley, and
shall be free of rot, mildew, and noxious weed seeds.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC.
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
7.4.4 Planting Procedures
1. Planting shall be performed in accordance with the current edition of
the Landscape Contractors Association "Landscape Specification
Guidelines" and as specified below.
2. Plants shall be randomly installed within the planting area, using the
plant spacing specified in the plant schedule as a guide.
3. Bare root stock shall be planted during the period of February 1 - April
30. Planting outside of these specified dates is not permissible without
approval from Albemarle Restorations, LLC.
4. Planting shall not occur during periods of sub-freezing temperatures,
when the ground is frozen or excessively wet or dry, or when other
conditions not generally accepted as suitable for planting persist.
5. Bare root stock shall be planted within two days of shipment.
6. Bare root seedlings and whips shall be minimum 1/4" to 1/2" caliper.
7. Bare root seedlings and whips shall be planted in accordance with the
detail provided on Sheet P-2 of the Restoration Design Plan Sheets unless
otherwise approved by Albemarle Restorations, LLC.
8. All woody material must be planted erect. Plants leaning greater than
10 degrees from perpendicular must be straightened or replanted by the
Contractor.
7.4.5 Maintenance and Guarantee
1. Plant material shall be maintained by the Contractor for one full year
from the date of final inspection and acceptance by Albermarle
Restorations, LLC. Maintenance shall include the removal and one-time
replacement of all dead or diseased woody vegetation.
2. The Contractor shall guarantee an 80% survival of all plants for the one
year period stated above, except in the case of damage by fire, animal
damage, vandalism, or other events beyond the Contractors ability to
control.
3. Plants which are 25% dead or more shall be considered dead.
4. Replacement plants shall be of the same type, size, and variety as the
plants specified herein, or substitutions approved by Albermarle
Restorations, LLC. Replacement plants shall be provided and installed
subject to the requirements of these plans and specifications.
7.5 Seeding
7.5.1 Final Grading
1. Prior to seeding, remove any mounds or surface irregularities not in
conformance with grading plan. Areas that have experienced washing out,
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC.
9

Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
rilling, or sediment deposition shall be reconstructed and grades re-
established by the Contractor in accordance with the plan or as otherwise
directed by Albemarle Restorations, LLC.
2. After bringing the wetland creation area to final grades, loosen soil by
discing or scarifying to a depth of at least 3 inches.
3. Prior to seeding, remove all trash, debris and large objects such as
stones that might interfere with the seeding operation.
4. Seeding of wetland areas is to be according to the Wetland Seed Mix
detail on Sheet P-2 of the Restoration Design Plan Sheets. Seed shall be
spread with a broadcast spreader and may be mixed with dry sand to
facilitate even spreading.
7.5.2 Soil Amendments
1. Soil tests must be performed to determine if lime and/or fertilizer are
required within seeding areas. Soil analysis may be performed by the
N.C. Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Agronomic
Division or a recognized commercial laboratory.
2. Amend soil as needed based on N.C. Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services Agronomic Division recommendations.
7.5.3 Seedbed Preparation
1. Seedbed preparation shall consist of loosening soil to a depth of 3-5"
by means of suitable agricultural or construction equipment such as disc
harrows or chisel plows or rippers mounted in construction equipment.
After the soil is loosened it should not be rolled or dragged smooth but left
in the roughened condition. Sloped areas (Exceeding 3:1) should be
tracked leaving an irregular surface with ridges running parallel to the
contour of the slope.
2. Apply fertilizer and lime if required.
3. If required, incorporate lime and fertilizer into the top 3-5" of soil by
disking or other suitable means.
7.5.4 Seed Specification
All seed shall be free of noxious weeds. All seed shall be subject to re-
testing by a recognized seed laboratory. All seed shall have been tested
within the 6 months immediately preceding the date of sowing such
materials on this job. Seed tags shall be made available to the inspector to
verify type and rate of seed used.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC. 10

r
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
7.5.5 Methods of Seeding
1. Dry seeding: This includes use of conventional drop or broadcast
spreaders.
a) Seed spread dry shall be incorporated into the subsoil at the rates
prescribed on the temporary or permanent seeding summaries or tables 25
or 26. The seeded areas shall then be rolled with a weighted roller to
provide good seed to soil contact.
b) Where practical, seed should be applied in two directions perpendicular
to each other. Apply half the seeding rate in each direction.
2. Drill or cultipacker seeding: Mechanized seeders that apply and cover
seed with soil.
a) Cultipacking seeders are required to bury the seed in such a fashion as
to provide at least 1/4 inch of soil covering. Seedbed must be firm after
planting.
b) Where practical, seed should be applied in two directions perpendicular
to each other. Apply half the seeding rate in each direction.
8.0 Monitoring
Monitoring plots will be installed and permanently monumented upon completion of
plant installation. A minimum of one sampling quadrant will be located within each
proposed vegetative community. Piezometers will be installed to measure subsurface
water levels during the five-year monitoring period. Following construction, a Mitigation
Plan and As Built Drawings will be prepared for the site and submitted to EEP. The
Mitigation Plan will include the monitoring plan and protocol, as well as an invasive and
exotic species management plan. The management plan will identify potential invasive
species as defined in the "North Carolina Noxious Weed List", identify site constraints,
and provide for a two-part control plan. The first part of the two-part plan will suppress
the establishment of noxious plants through eradication of existing species seen on site
and installation of sufficient densities of native woody and herbaceous species. The
second part will be to implement an early detection and rapid response program, to
identify and remove invasive species before they become established.
Monitoring will be completed using random permanent sampling quadrants as outlined in
the Mitigation Plan for a minimum five-year period, or until success of the project can be
validated. Monitoring Reports will be submitted to EEP by December 31 of the year in
which the monitoring was conducted. In the unlikely event that success criteria outlined
below are not achieved by the end of the five-year minimum monitoring period, with
permission from EEP corrective measures including regrading, replanting, removal of
certain species, etc. will be performed. If areas are deemed to be severely deficient in
meeting the success criteria, Albemarle Restoration, LLC may opt to ask the Department
to allow corrective measures prior to the end of the five-year period.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC. 11
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina- February 2006
Revised, May 2006
9.0 Success Criteria:
Success of the project will go beyond the establishment of wetland hydrology and a
predominance of hydrophytic vegetation. Because the goals of the project are to create a
diverse wetland system, the success criteria will be tied directly to those goals. The
intent of the project is to create a diverse wetland forest, interspersed with small areas of
emergent wetlands, shallow open water, and hummocks. We believe that the creation of
this diverse system is necessary to provide the range of intended functions and values.
The primary indicators of success will therefore be the establishment of a range of
wetland hydrology including inundated, saturated, seasonally saturated, and upland
hummock areas. Approximate acreages for each wetland hydrologic regime are shown
on Sheet P-1 of the Restoration Design Plan Sheets. The site will be deemed successful
if the acreages of each regimes fall within a reasonable range related to the design during
normal climatic conditions. Site hydrology during years of excessive rainfall or extreme
drought will be assessed with climatic conditions in mind.
10.0 References
Albemarle Restorations, LLC. . Albemarle Restorations field data collection
within Martin County, North Carolina. 2005.
American Association of Nurserymen. The American Standard for Nursery Stock. 1250
I Street, N.W., Suite 500, Washington, DC. 1986.
Landscape Contractor's Association of Metropolitan Washington. Landscape
Specification Guidelines. LCAMW. Rockville, Maryland. 1993.
Lynch, Karen M. "Common Wetland Plants of North Carolina." NCDENR, Division of
Parks and Recreation Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality Water Quality Section. Raleigh, North Carolina:
Report # 97-01, August 1997.
McGill, S. "Technical Proposal Bid Number 16-DO5024 Modlin Property."
Albermarle Restorations, LLC. Gatesville, North Carolina. 2005.
North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Plant Industry
Division-Plant Protection Section. "North Carolina Noxious Weed List."
http://www.agr.state.nc.us/plantind/t)lant/weed/noxweed.htm. September 2005.
NCDENR, Division of Coastal Management. "GIS Wetland Type Mapping for the North
Carolina Coastal Plain." GIS Data Guidance Document.
http://dcm2.enr.state.nc.us/Wetlands/wtypeguidanceweb.pdf. September 2005.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC. 12
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources(NCDENR), Division
of Water Quality. "Roanoke River Basinwide Water Quality Management Plan."
July, 2001.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, NCDENR, Division of Parks and Recreation.
"Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Animal Species of North Carolina."
1999.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, NCDENR, Division of Parks and Recreation.
"Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Plant Species of North Carolina."
1999.
North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program. "Watershed
Restoration Plan for the Roanoke River Basin." North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR), Division of Water Quality.
2001.
Riddick, Lisa A. "Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Modlin Property, Poplar
Chapel Road Jamesville, Martin County, North Carolina." NorthEast
Environmental, P.C. October 10, 2005.
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service.
"Martin County Soil Survey." September, 1989.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service. "Martin County Endangered Species,
Threatened Species, and Federal Species of Concern." h ://nc-
es.fws.gov/es/cnt li?artin.html. September 2005.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC. 13
r
? ?? ?31.??.,?1 J61
R' R! CY C. {L.11M
June 13, 2006
Albemarle Restorations, LLC
Attn: Ed Temple
404 Court Street
Gatesville, North Carolina 27938
Subject: Modlin Property Wetland Restoration Plan
Roanoke River Basin - Cataloging Unit 03010107
Martin County
Contract # D05024-1
Dear Mr. Temple:
In May 2006, Albemarle Restorations, LLC submitted the subject Restoration Plan for the
Modlin Property Wetland Restoration Full Delivery Project. The project is located off Poplar
Chapel Road near the Town of Jamesville in Martin County, North Carolina. The Restoration
Plan proposes to restore 40.0 acres of prior converted cropland by restoring wetland hydrology
and planting appropriate vegetation to establish a bottomland hardwood forest. The restored
system will mimic the conditions found in riverine wetlands just below headwater areas.
The Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) has reviewed the restoration plan and has no
comments at this time. Please proceed with acquiring all necessary permits and/or certifications
and complete the implementation of the earthwork portion of the mitigation project (Task 4).
If you have any questions, or wish to discuss this matter further, please contact me at (919)715-
1656 or email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Guy C. Pearce
EEP Full Delivery Program Supervisor
cc: files
s n c ... kth I ?'", t. j... Protect ? Oak- ? -We' OA"'
Nnhed Strobes Depwftm t of Agelf
o MRCS
Natural Resources Conservation Service
104 Kehukee Park Road
WIIUamston, N.C. 27892
March 23, 2005
Mr. William N. Modlin
1841 Poplar Chapel Road
Jamesville, NC 27846
Dear Billy,
I have reviewed the soils maps on your tract 2087 of Poplar Chapel Road as it
relates to wetland classifications within USDA. The acreage proposed for the
conservation easement is comprised of Bethera loam soil and was cleared for
row crops in the late 1970's prior to the swampbaster provision's of the 1985
Food Security Act Therefore this area of approximately 120 acres is classed as
Prior Converted Wetlands (PC) and is exempt from any USDA regulations,
Good luck on the wildlife enhanpements that may be planned.
Sincerely,
Vv
Rup W. Hasty
District Conservationist
USDA - NRCS
encl: Soils Map
Tract Map
156 EZ
The Natural Resources Conservation Service provides leadership in a partnership effort to help people
conserve, maintain, and Improve our natural resources and environment.

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
state Historic Preservation Office
1 B. Babe*. AdrAdWdw Office of Archives and History
Michael Easley, Governor Division of Historical Resources
Evans, Secretary David Brook, Director
1.isbeUr C.
)eirrcy J. Crow, Deputy Setif y
September S, 2005
Scott McGill
Ecotone, Inc
PO Box 5
Jarrettsville, MD 21084
Re: Modlin Property, Cooper Swamp Farm, Martin County, ER05-2015
Dear Mr. McGill:
Thank you for your letter of August 25, 2005, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. 'Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and considemtioa. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledh&Earley, environmenud review coordinator, at 919-733-4763. In all future
number.
communication concerning this project, please cite the above-referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
P er Sandbeck
IT
Maw Addrw TdepAona/Fax
Lecedw 46117 Moil Semite Center, R&WO NC 2769'94617 (919)7334763/733 8653
W it Bleaet Sheet. Rdoo NC el Sa?ioe COW. ? VC 27699.4617 (919y133 6SM 13.4801
ApMIIV1STRATION
RESTORATION 515 N Blwn Slretl. Raleigh 46174617MMail Semite OerM? Ralei&NC 276994617 (914)7336545/715 4801
9UHVEY & PLANNING 515 N. Blvd Shed. RaloiSlti NC

Q
o V
3
o
m ?

? I
? FPG AN
?P

i
I

/ I

NEW-
MOH I
I
L
ST
64 JAMESVILLE -
_ ?
--
EWA_H LEE RD

G
COOPER

v ° PROJECT AREA
_wIM
Sw per- LU
a I I I

NIE s 2

Z 1

SCALE
0 4000 8000
EXHIBIT A
INC
ECOTONE Vicinity Map
, MODUN PROPERTY
RIVERINE WETLAND RESTORATION 40 WMU'S
P.o. Bou 5 - i2o4 Baldwin mill Road JsrretWlk, Maryland 21094 Scale: 1" = 4000' 1/2005 Drawn By: LMS
[phone] • Feu [phone] • E-Mail fnfo/ecADneinc.wm

z
Co

L
f
b? °
I
2 m

a?
l? C
0 Co ?

W

x

a r
g' a
'J? I 1 g rs

.,
C
?
C
A
o L a
°`?€
m s=` o

F
F
z
- 0r
--4 r

m g o

?
p O
O
> V) c cl
a
-4
? a
°
- g$ g
??
?
n
?
e H W
= OC a
ZoC
1
co
pz
LL ?
z z p_
C
n
N
!O? W C N_ m 001
E.?d E m iri
r
m x Z
W
~ Q
O

?
. I l
Ua m
$
? id U raNOVi? 4
W 0
?
j s
m
U a Q
W

[.. n
J
A= W
O LLJ

u L

N
S
C Z EL- j
U

V
-
- w
z

N Q 1 o

?N
N w o0

w 2

W Q z
fO

U
U z Z
0

?I?
o W -

J

3 LO
g

•Q? N
t?0
c Y, ..- ?, f ¢f
C f)
-VILL
3
^ h.r. 4??1 T \ Y
l
Exhibit D
Typical Views of the Modlin Property

ation 3

ECOTONE, Inc.
FOREST AND WETLAND CREATION
RIVER RESTORATION
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING AND PERMITTING
PONDS AND STREAMS
CONSTRUCTION
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
401 Unit Supervisor
2321 Crab Tree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27699
RE: Modlin Property Wetland Restoration
Dear Ms. Karoly:
1? 7
..?r I
June 14, 2006

Ecotone, Inc., on behalf of our client, Albemarle Restorations, LLC, is requesting 401
State Water Quality Certification to restore 40 acres of riverine wetlands on the Modlin
Property, located on Poplar Chapel Road near Jamesville, in Martin County, North
Carolina.
Albemarle Restorations, LLC has contracted with the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem Enhancement Program to restore 40
acres of prior converted cropland. The project involves minor grading and shaping to
restore wetland hydrology as well as an extensive planting plan. 'A variety of wetland
types, including bottomland hardwood, scrub shrub, and emergent wetland types are
proposed to maximize habitat diversity. A conservation easement has been recorded to
protect the constructed wetlands in perpetuity. A small ditch traverses the center of the
project area and carries intermittent flow across the property. This ditch will be
temporarily impacted by the proposed grading activities. The foot print of the ditch will
be converted to vegetated nontidal wetlands.
We anticipate the Corps of Engineers will verify that the project is authorized under the
Nationwide Permit #27, Wetland and Riparian Restoration and Creation, and therefore
qualifies for General Water Quality Certification GC3495.
Enclosed please find seven (7) copies of the following:
• Completed Pre-Construction Notification Application Form;
• Wetland Restoration Plan Narrative;
Wetland Restoration Plan Sheets;
• EEP Approval Letter;
• USDA-NRCS Prior Converted Wetlands Letter;
• Letter from the State Historical and Preservation Office;
• Exhibit A - Vicinity Map;
04 BALDWIN MILL ROAD ,UI
F.O. BOX 5, 12 o
JARRETTSVILLE, MARYLAND 21084 JUN
[phone] WP1'?Wdl1A1.1rY CH
FAX [phone] jpg"S1C,R!l? y1 R BRAN
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Modlin Property Wetland Restoration
June 14, 2006
Page 2 of 2
• Exhibit B - Project Area in Relation to Sub-basin;
• Exhibit C - Project Area in Relation to Existing Forests; and
• Exhibit D - Photographs.
Thank you for taking the time to review this application and please contact me if you
have any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
Ecoto e, Inc.
colt McGill
Principal
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(it any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 27
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), c u ck?iexe ?_?
?5?1?'G D
II. Applicant Information p
1. Owner/Applicant Information JUN 1 s zoos
Name: Albemarle Restorations UENR -
WEP ANDS QUAII
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 204 BRANCH
Gatesville NC 27938
Contact: Mr. Scott McGill
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: smc g lAecotoneinc.com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Mr. Scott McGill
Company Affiliation: Ecotone Inc.
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 5,1204 Baldwin Mill Road
Jarrettsville MD 21084
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: smcgillaa,ecotoneinc.com
Page 5 of 13
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Modlin Property Wetland Restoration
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0102371
4. Location
County: Martin Nearest Town: Jamesville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): NA
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Located on Poplar Chapel
Road near Jamesville, in Martin County, North Carolina
Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35°47'55.16" °N 76°51'32.87" °W
6. Property size (acres): Approximately 159 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Cooper Swamp
8. River Basin: Roanoke
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is currently used for agricultural purposes
Page 6 of 13
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
project will restore 40 acres of riverine wetlands with a mix of bottomland hardwood, scrub
shrub and emergent wetland tXpes The restoration plans have been developed based on
reference wetlands The project will involve minor grading and shaping averaging less than
1 foot of cut/fill to restore wetland hydrology to the agricultural fields. Equipment that will
be used on site during construction may include excavators dozers loaders, track trucks, and
other standard excavation equipment
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The baseline goals of the project are to create
wetland hydrology and establish a viable community of wetland vegetation throughout the
project area The target plant community is a Bottomland Hardwood Forest interspersed with
shrub/scrub wetland and shallow open water habitats which will help provide a continuous
forested and diverse greenway along, the tributary Mitigation credits generated will be
utilized by the Ecosystem Enhancement Program to offset compensatory mitigation
requirements with Roanoke River Basin Cataloging unit 03010107.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.N/A
The project area is prior converted cropland See attached letter from NRCS.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No the project site is protected in perpetuity through the recordation of a conservation easement
in the Land Records of Martin County, North Carolina
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
Page 7 of 13
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The existing ditch acting as a
stream is to be filled to create the desired hydrophytic conditions present in a diverse wetland
system Impacts to the ditch will be temporary since the ditch area will be converted to
wetlands.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
linear feet Area of
Impact
(acres)
NONE

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma Before Impact linear feet acres
Conversion to

I Ditch draining to
Wetlands
Intermittent 7,5 If
+/- 2,950 if
+/- .5 ac
Cooper Swamp (temporary)
Page 8 of 13
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) I +/- 2,9501f I +/- .5 ac
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, floodin , drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc. Area of
Impact
acres
NONE

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Im act (acres): +1-.5
Wetland Impact acres : 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) +/-.5
Total Stream Impact linear feet): +/-2,950-
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
Page 9 of 13
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The proposed impacts are
temporary and beneficial to the wetland resource and its watershed. The project will restore
wetland hydrology to 40 acres of prior converted cropland. The conversion of ditch to wetland
will reduce erosion enhance nutrient uptake and provide beneficial wildlife habitat.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
Page 10 of 13
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The proposed project will create 40 acres of Riverine Wetlands within the Roanoke River
Basin A conservation easement will preserve the site in perpetuity. See Modlin Site
Riverine Wetland Project for specific details and information.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Page 11 of 13
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier I Required
1 I I 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total I I I I
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. N/A, No proposed impervious surfaces.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Page 12 of 13
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: The
project is designed to increase the quality of water downstream of the site
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Page 13 of 13
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Modlin Property Restoration Plan Narrative
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................1
2.0 Project Goals and Objectives ..............................................................2
3.0 Site Location .........................................................................................2
4.0 General Watershed Description ...........................................................2
5.0 Existing Site Conditions ...................................................................3
5.1 Soils .............................................................................................................3
5.2 Hydrology ............................................................................
5.3 Adjoining Land Uses .............................................................. .
5.4 Threatened/Endangered Species and Existing Vegetation ................... .4
5.5 Jurisdictional Wetlands ..............................................................4
5.6 Historic Preservation ................................................................ .5
6.0 Reference Wetlands .........................................................................5
6.1 Hydrological Characterization .................................................. .5
6.2 Soil Characterization ...............................................................
6.3 Plant Community Characterization ............................................. .6
7.0 Wetland Restoration Plan ................................................................ .6
7.1 Hydrologic Modifications ........................................................ .6
7.2 Soil Restoration .....................................................................7
7.3 Plant Community Restoration .....................................................
7.4 Plant Material ...................................................................... .8
7.4.1 Planting Specifications ................................................... .8
7.4.2 Storage and Delivery ..................................................... .8
7.4.3 Products .................................................................... .
7.4.4 Planting Procedures ........................................................9
7.4.5 Maintenance and Guarantee ............................................. .9
7.5 Seeding ............................................................................. .9
7.5.1 Final Grading .............................................................. .9
7.5.2 Soil Amendment ............................................................. 10
7.5.3 Seedbed Preparation ...................................................... 10
7.5.4 Seed Specification ........................................................ 10
7.5.5 Method of Seeding ....................................................... 11
8.0 Monitoring ................................................................................ 11
9.0 Success Criteria .......................................................................... 12
10.0 References .................................................................................. 12
11.0 Res toration Plan Sheets ................................................................. 14
Appendix A - Figures
Appendix B - Supporting Documents
Recorded Easement
USDA Exemption
Historic Preservation
Threatened/Endangered Species
Appendix C - Photographs
Appendix D - Hydraulic and Hydrolgic Analysis (H&H Study)
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC.
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation
1.0 Introduction
The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem
Enhancement Program has selected 40 acres of the property owned by William Nathan
Modlin for wetland restoration to fulfill a portion of the Request for Proposals: Full
Delivery Project Roanoke River Basin. The purpose of the RFP is to provide
compensatory stream, wetland and/or buffer mitigation within the Roanoke River Basin
Catologing Unit 03010107. The Request for Proposal has been designated RFP 16-
D05024 and the closing date for the request was February 17, 2005. Albemarle
Restorations, LLC entered into a contract with the State of North Carolina on June 27,
2005 to deliver 40 wetland mitigation units within this project site (Contract No. D05024-
1).
Albemarle Restorations, LLC proposes to create 40 acres of riverine wetlands (40
Wetland Mitigation Units) on the Modlin Property, located on Poplar Chapel Road near
Jamesville, in Martin County, North Carolina. The project site is in the above referenced
watershed and is in close proximity to Cooper Swamp. In addition, the site is within 1.5
miles of the Roanoke River and is within the required 5-year floodprone area.
The site has been chosen in part because of its location in a targeted watershed and
because it provides the opportunity to add contiguous wetland forest to the extensive and
diverse Roanoke River floodplain forest. The project's location in the Lower Roanoke
River Sub-basin (Sub-basin 03-02-09) allow the 40 acres to be placed in a conservation
easement to join more than 55,000 acres of protected land in the watershed, including
34,000 acres of publicly owned land and 21,000 acres of timberland under conservation
management. In addition, the project is located in a watershed upstream from the
Roanoke River (Sub-basin 03-02-09), which is listed on the North Carolina 303(d) List
of impaired waterways. The Lower Roanoke River Sub-basin is also one of seven
priority targets for The Nature Conservancy in North Carolina. This project site has been
selected because of the soils present, and a very shallow depth to groundwater (indicated
by extensive past ditching). Previous site visits have revealed high water marks from
frequent overbank flooding and widespread wet soil conditions. These factors indicate
that minimal grading will be necessary, and that the desired hydrophytic vegetation to be
planted will thrive.
An unnamed tributary to Cooper Swamp flows through the property, which is currently
used for agricultural purposes with very little native vegetation present. The conversion
of this site from agricultural use to established riverine wetlands will create a
nearly unbroken forested buffer along the entire tributary, making this a practical and
environmentally beneficial restoration project.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC.
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
2.0 Project Goals and Objectives
The restoration plans have been developed based on reference wetlands and utilizing the
50 years of combined wetland restoration experience brought forth by the principals of
Albemarle Restorations, LLC. The baseline goals of the project are to create wetland
hydrology and establish a viable community of wetland vegetation throughout the project
area. Beyond that, the goals and objectives are as follows:
1) Provide floodflow attenuation.
2) Water Quality improvement through sediment, toxicant, and nutrient retention
and reduction.
3) Slow over bank flow rates and provide storage and desynchronization of flood
waters.
4) Alleviate downstream flooding issues by lessening the effect of pulse or
flashy flows.
5) Provide shading through forest cover to reduce algae growth and associated
low dissolved oxygen levels in surface water moving through the site.
6) The production and export of food sources.
7) The creation of wildlife habitat and recreational opportunities.
3.0 Site Location
The 40-acre project site is located in the center of the Modlin property, also known as
Cooper Swamp Farm, in the Deep Run Swamp Watershed (USGS Catalog Unit
03010107150010), a Targeted Local Watershed in the 2001 "Watershed Restoration Plan
for the Roanoke River Basin" released by the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program. The restoration site lies along the mid and upper reaches of an unnamed
tributary to Cooper Swamp found on the +/- 159-acre Modlin property. The site is
accessed from Poplar Chapel Road, south of Jamesville, via and existing farm lane
serving the Modlin and adjoining properties. Figure 1 is a vicinity map found in
Appendix A. Downstream from the site, the tributary runs almost entirely through
wooded areas containing extensive wetlands before joining the main stem of Cooper
Swamp. Above the site, the headwaters and upper reaches of the tributary are located in
forested and forested wetland areas. The tributary and the proximity of the site to nearby
forested areas on the most recent available GIS air photos of the area are shown on
Figure 2 in Appendix A.
4.0 General Watershed Description
The project site is located in Targeted Local Watershed 50010, Deep Swamp Run, which
lies in Sub-basin 03-02-09, the Lower Roanoke River. The following information was
extrapolated from the "Watershed Restoration Plan for the Roanoke River Basin, 2001."
Forested land constitutes 71% of the land in Sub-basin 03-02-09, while 25% is
agricultural in this 559 square mile area through which the lower 83 miles of the Roanoke
River and its tributaries flow. In 1990 the population in this sub-basin was estimated at
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC. 2
h
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
58,886 people. Channelized headwaters of Deep Swamp Run have led to critical habitat
loss in the watershed which is bordered by broad floodplain forests (DWQ, 2001). Deep
Run Swamp is not within a DWQ water Supply Watershed, is not a Designated High
Quality or Outstanding Resource Water, and has no presence of the Aquatic Natural
Heritage Element.
5.0 Existing Site Conditions
The Modlin farm consists of approximately 159 +/- acres, 40 of which are designated for
this project site. These 40 acres are located within the central portion of the farm. This
area is bisected by a deep drainage ditch that runs southwest from the property boundary,
then curves toward the northwest, extending to the western property line, and is currently
bordered by agricultural fields of the remaining Modlin farm to the north, south, and
west, and timberland to the east. The Modlin residence is located to the northwest of the
parcel and the surrounding area consists of residential, agricultural, and timberland
properties. Degradation to the channel and surrounding areas by past agricultural
activities, including channel straightening and planting of row crops up to the channel
edges, allow excessive nutrient and sediment accumulation in the channel. These past
activities have also served to reduce the flood flow attenuation capabilities of the historic
undisturbed channel. Appendix C contains photographs taken during a recent site visit,
showing the degradation of the channel and the proximity of tilled ground. The site is not
located within a FEMA regulated floodplain, therefore floodplain requirements are not
addressed in this restoration plan.
5.1 Soils
Soils examined at several locations throughout the project site in fall of 2004
exhibited strong hydric indicators, including sulfitic odor and deep gray color to a
depth of 18 inches. The majority of the site soils are mapped Bethera loam, with
a small portion mapped Lenoir loam. Bethera loam is a poorly drained, nearly
level soil which exhibits moderately slow to slow permeability and moderate to
high available water capacity. The seasonal high water table is at or within 1 foot
of the surface. Lenoir loam is somewhat poorly drained, nearly level, has slow
permeability, and moderate available water capacity. During wet months, the
seasonal high water table is at a depth of 1 to 2.5 feet.
5.2 Hydrology
The project site is currently bisected by a drainage ditch created when the land
was converted to cropland. The proposed design calls for the ditch to be filled
and a broad flat drainage course to be created to mimic conditions found in
riverine wetlands just below headwater areas. The hydrology of the project
wetlands is to be derived from overbank flooding of the drainage course,
supplemented by a high water table associated with the Bethera soils. The
Bethera loam mapped on the site is classified as hydric with a seasonally high
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC.
3
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina- February 2006
Revised, May 2006
water table and low hydraulic conductivity which allows surface and subsurface
water to be retained for long periods during the growing season. The Hydric
Code for the soil is (1), meaning it is saturated for a significant period during the
growing season. Based on historical accounts from the property owner the area
was wetland prior to being cleared and ditched. Hydrology is similar to
conditions at the reference site and wetland hydrology should be achieved quickly
after the site grading is completed.
5.3 Adjoining Land Uses
The topography of the project site is extremely flat, with slightly lower elevations
on the western side at a tributary of Cooper Swamp. Properties to the east and
northeast of the project site that are within the project site's drainage area are
mapped as agricultural fields or timberland.
5.4 Threatened/Endangered Species and Existing Vegetation
On August 23, 2005 a letter (see Appendix B) was sent by Albemarle
Restorations, LLC to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services
Office requesting a project review for coordination under the Endangered Species
Act, the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.
Albemarle Restorations, LLC received no response. A review of Martin County's
Threatened and Endangered Species list showed only one threatened species, the
Bald Eagle. Neither this species, nor its habitat, is currently found on the project
site.
The only existing vegetation within the project area consists of soybeans grown
for agricultural purposes. The lines of trees that transected the project site, or
"windrows" as Mr. Modlin referred to them, have been cleared. Any native
vegetation present is incidental and on a scale that is not measurable for the
purposes of this report.
5.5 Jurisdictional Wetlands
A letter dated March 23, 2005 (see Appendix B) was received by Mr. Modlin
from the United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources
Conservation Service in Williamston, NC. The letter states that the land in
question was cleared for the planting of crops in the late 1970's, and is designated
as Prior Converted Wetlands, making it exempt from any USDA regulations.
Based upon field investigations and the above referenced Prior Converted ruling,
it is our belief that no jurisdictional wetlands are found on the project site. A
request for a formal Jurisdictional Determination by the COE has been made, and
results of the Determination will be supplied when completed.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC.
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina- February 2006
Revised, May 2006
5.6 Historic Preservation
On September 8, 2005 Ecotone, Inc. received a letter (see Appendix B) from the
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation
Office concerning the subject site. The letter states that the above agency is
"aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project."
6.0 Reference Wetlands
Two separate wetlands, one in the Cooper Swamp drainage and the other in the Clark
Mill Creek drainage (a tributary to the Pungo River watershed), were used as reference
sites for this project. Site 1 is approximately 2,000 ft west of the intersection of Poplar
Chapel Rd and the CSX Railroad. This intersection is a'/4 mile south of U.S. Highway
64, 1 mile east of Jamesville, NC. Site 2 is approximately 2,400 ft north of U.S. Route
264 on the Armstrong Property in Ponzer, Hyde County, NC.
Site 1 is in Martin County, North Carolina and was sampled on February 10, 2006. This
is a wetland site typical of a mid-age stand of mixed hardwoods and pine that would be
found in wetlands throughout northeastern North Carolina. Site 2 is in Hyde County, and
is a typical Cypress-Gum Riverine Wetland.
6.1 Hydrological Characterization
The hydrology of site 1 is seasonally or semi-permanently inundated or saturated
during the growing season. At site 2 the hydrology is best characterized as
seasonally flooded or semi-permanently inundated. At both sites, the hydrology
is derived from a combination of a high groundwater table, slow permeability, and
overbank flooding. Microtopography variations create soil conditions at both
sites ranging from inundation up to 18 inches to saturation at a depth of ten
inches.
6.2 Soil Characterization
The soils at site 1 were mapped Bethera loam, 0-2 percent slopes, and poorly
drained. Field observations confirmed this mapped type. A profile of the soils at
site 1 produced the following: Horizon A was found from a depth of 0-6 inches
and was of a loam/organic nature. Horizon B occurred from a depth of 6-11 inches
and was clay/loam in nature with a matrix color of IOYR 511, and mottle colors of
10YR 5/8. Mottles were common in abundance and distinct in contrast. Horizon
132 occurred from a depth of 9-18 inches and was also of a clay/loam nature with
a matrix color of IOYR 5/1, and mottle colors of 10YR 6/8. Mottles were
common in abundance and distinct in contrast. All colors described at this site are
considered Munsell Moist.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC.
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina- February 2006
Revised, May 2006
The soils at reference site 2 were mapped Dorovan muck, 0-1 percent slopes, and
frequently flooded. Field observations confirmed this mapped type. A profile of
the soils at site 2 produced the following: The O Horizon was found from a depth
of 0-3 inches and was of a loam/organic nature. Horizon A occurred from a depth
of 3-9 inches and was silty loam with a matrix color of 10YR 3/1. Horizon B
occurred from a depth of 9 inches on, and was silty clay with a matrix color of
10YR 4/1. Photographs for both reference sites can be found in Appendix C.
6.3 Plant Community Characterization
At site 1, 95 percent of the dominant species were OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-). Vegetation was dense in the shrub and canopy layers, with a
typical understory for this area containing switch cane, pepper bush, and younger
canopy species (red maple, sweet gum). The mid-level canopy was dominated by
younger canopy species and shrub/scrub (sweet bay, wax myrtle). The canopy
included loblolly pine, swamp white oak, water oak, pin oak, and red maple. See
Appendix C for photographs of the site.
At site 2, 100 percent of the dominant species were OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-). The forest type was a middle-age mixed stand with the canopy
dominated by bald cypress, and understory containing sweetgum, red maple,
sweetbay magnolia, American holly, and loblolly pine. The shrub layer contained
sweet bay, highbush blueberry, and fetter-bush with greenbriar and Japanese
honeysuckle. See Appendix C for photographs.
7.0 Wetland Restoration Plan
The goal of the proposed restoration plan is to create a riverine wetland system typically
found in the middle to upper reaches of first order tributary systems. The target plant
community is a Bottomland Hardwood Forest interspersed with shrub/scrub wetland and
shallow open water habitats, which will help provide a continuous forested and diverse
greenway along the tributary. Any invasive or exotic species found on the site while earth
work is being completed will be removed through physical or chemical means.
7.1 Hydrologic Modifications
Hydrologic modifications on the site will be achieved through the filing of the
main ditch bisecting the site and contributing side ditches, and creating a broad
drainage course with a very low gradient (less than 0.5 percent slope) and an
associated low floodplain. Overland flow from the 141-acre drainage area will
inundate the entire area during major flooding events (see Appendix D for the
HEC-RAS analysis of the site), and the seasonally high water table historically
found on the site will maintain saturated soils throughout significant periods
during the growing season.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC. 6
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina- February 2006
Revised, May 2006
To add to the retention time of flooding events in the wetland area,
microtopography will be used to create hummocks and depressions found in
undisturbed swamps in the area and two low berm structures have been designed
at the lower end of the system. The outfall from the system is in the center of the
downstream berm structure, and will channel flood flows through a wide outfall
into the existing ditch that will remain at the western edge of the property. A
series of supplemental ditches, located outside the project area, will be installed to
prevent hydrologic trespass onto adjacent cropland.
7.2 Soil Restoration
Soils found in the project area currently exhibit hydric characteristics and will
remain. In areas where grading of more than one and one-half feet is proposed,
soil from the upper horizon will be stockpiled and redistributed prior to
establishing final grade. Because sufficient organic material appears to be present
to a significant depth, no amendments are specified. Large woody debris
encountered in windrows currently within the project area will be placed
throughout the created wetlands to add variety to soil conditions and encourage
diversity of volunteer species.
7.3 Plant Community Restoration
The plant species chosen for the project are native to the area, with an emphasis
on species that will provide habitat and a viable, yearlong food source for a wide
range of animal and plant species. Surrounding areas are home to bear, whitetail
deer, raccoon, squirrel, fox, migrating waterfowl, and a wide variety of amphibian
and reptile species, and the project is intended provide food and habitat to
complement and enhance the existing ecosystem. Hydrophytic species shown on
the planting plan were selected to create a diverse matrix of wetland communities
including Bottomland Hardwood Forest interspersed areas of open water and
emergent wetland. Invasive and exotic species will not be planted on the site.
Any invasive or exotic species found on the site will be removed through physical
or chemical means during the planting phase. In selecting vegetation, we have
considered the reference riverine wetland areas adjacent to the site and "Dominant
Plants for Major Wetland Types" published by the North Carolina Department of
Environment Water Quality Section. Sheet P-2 contains detailed planting and
seeding schedules for the site.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC.
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
7.4 Plant Material
7.4.1 Planting Specifications
1. Planting material will conform to the current issue of the "American
Standards for Nursery Stock", published by the "American Association of
Nurserymen".
2. The root system of plant material shall be well-developed and
undamaged, and the plant size must conform to the size specified. Plants
not meeting these criteria will be rejected.
3. Foliage of non-dormant plants shall appear healthy, with no leaf spots,
damage, discoloration, or wilting, and no evidence of insects on the plant.
Plants not meeting these criteria will be rejected.
4. Planting materials may be substituted upon written approval from
Albemarle Restorations, LLC.
7.4.2 Storage and Delivery
1. Seed shall be delivered in containers having labels reporting the origin,
purity, and germination percentage of the seed, and the date of
germination testing of the seed.
2. All bare root plants shall be clearly and correctly labeled to allow
confirmation of species and quantities. At least 25% of each species in
every shipment shall have legible labels securely attached prior to delivery
to the site.
3. All plants delivered to the project site must have thoroughly moist
soil/root masses. Dry or light-weight plants shall be rejected.
4. All rejected material shall be immediately removed from the project
site.
5. All plants delivered to the project site shall be stored in a cool, shaded
location, and watered regularly so that roots are kept moist until time of
planting.
7.4.3 Products
1. Planting Schedules specifying quantity, species, size, condition, and
spacing can be found on Sheet P-2 of the Restoration Design Plan Sheets.
2. Straw shall be from small grain species such as wheat or barley, and
shall be free of rot, mildew, and noxious weed seeds.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC.
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
7.4.4 Planting Procedures
1. Planting shall be performed in accordance with the current edition of
the Landscape Contractors Association "Landscape Specification
Guidelines" and as specified below.
2. Plants shall be randomly installed within the planting area, using the
plant spacing specified in the plant schedule as a guide.
3. Bare root stock shall be planted during the period of February 1 - April
30. Planting outside of these specified dates is not permissible without
approval from Albemarle Restorations, LLC.
4. Planting shall not occur during periods of sub-freezing temperatures,
when the ground is frozen or excessively wet or dry, or when other
conditions not generally accepted as suitable for planting persist.
5. Bare root stock shall be planted within two days of shipment.
6. Bare root seedlings and whips shall be minimum 1/4" to 1/2" caliper.
7. Bare root seedlings and whips shall be planted in accordance with the
detail provided on Sheet P-2 of the Restoration Design Plan Sheets unless
otherwise approved by Albemarle Restorations, LLC.
8. All woody material must be planted erect. Plants leaning greater than
10 degrees from perpendicular must be straightened or replanted by the
Contractor.
7.4.5 Maintenance and Guarantee
1. Plant material shall be maintained by the Contractor for one full year
from the date of final inspection and acceptance by Albermarle
Restorations, LLC. Maintenance shall include the removal and one-time
replacement of all dead or diseased woody vegetation.
2. The Contractor shall guarantee an 80% survival of all plants for the one
year period stated above, except in the case of damage by fire, animal
damage, vandalism, or other events beyond the Contractors ability to
control.
3. Plants which are 25% dead or more shall be considered dead.
4. Replacement plants shall be of the same type, size, and variety as the
plants specified herein, or substitutions approved by Albermarle
Restorations, LLC. Replacement plants shall be provided and installed
subject to the requirements of these plans and specifications.
7.5 Seeding
7.5.1 Final Grading
1. Prior to seeding, remove any mounds or surface irregularities not in
conformance with grading plan. Areas that have experienced washing out,
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC. 9
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
rilling, or sediment deposition shall be reconstructed and grades re-
established by the Contractor in accordance with the plan or as otherwise
directed by Albemarle Restorations, LLC.
2. After bringing the wetland creation area to final grades, loosen soil by
discing or scarifying to a depth of at least 3 inches.
3. Prior to seeding, remove all trash, debris and large objects such as
stones that might interfere with the seeding operation.
4. Seeding of wetland areas is to be according to the Wetland Seed Mix
detail on Sheet P-2 of the Restoration Design Plan Sheets. Seed shall be
spread with a broadcast spreader and may be mixed with dry sand to
facilitate even spreading.
7.5.2 Soil Amendments
1. Soil tests must be performed to determine if lime and/or fertilizer are
required within seeding areas. Soil analysis may be performed by the
N.C. Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Agronomic
Division or a recognized commercial laboratory.
2. Amend soil as needed based on N.C. Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services Agronomic Division recommendations.
7.5.3 Seedbed Preparation
1. Seedbed preparation shall consist of loosening soil to a depth of 3-5"
by means of suitable agricultural or construction equipment such as disc
harrows or chisel plows or rippers mounted in construction equipment.
After the soil is loosened it should not be rolled or dragged smooth but left
in the roughened condition. Sloped areas (Exceeding 3:1) should be
tracked leaving an irregular surface with ridges running parallel to the
contour of the slope.
2. Apply fertilizer and lime if required.
3. If required, incorporate lime and fertilizer into the top 3-5" of soil by
disking or other suitable means.
7.5.4 Seed Specification
All seed shall be free of noxious weeds. All seed shall be subject to re-
testing by a recognized seed laboratory. All seed shall have been tested
within the 6 months immediately preceding the date of sowing such
materials on this job. Seed tags shall be made available to the inspector to
verify type and rate of seed used.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC. 10
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
7.5.5 Methods of Seeding
1. Dry seeding: This includes use of conventional drop or broadcast
spreaders.
a) Seed spread dry shall be incorporated into the subsoil at the rates
prescribed on the temporary or permanent seeding summaries or tables 25
or 26. The seeded areas shall then be rolled with a weighted roller to
provide good seed to soil contact.
b) Where practical, seed should be applied in two directions perpendicular
to each other. Apply half the seeding rate in each direction.
2. Drill or cultipacker seeding: Mechanized seeders that apply and cover
seed with soil.
a) Cultipacking seeders are required to bury the seed in such a fashion as
to provide at least 1/4 inch of soil covering. Seedbed must be firm after
planting.
b) Where practical, seed should be applied in two directions perpendicular
to each other. Apply half the seeding rate in each direction.
8.0 Monitoring
Monitoring plots will be installed and permanently monumented upon completion of
plant installation. A minimum of one sampling quadrant will be located within each
proposed vegetative community. Piezometers will be installed to measure subsurface
water levels during the five-year monitoring period. Following construction, a Mitigation
Plan and As Built Drawings will be prepared for the site and submitted to EEP. The
Mitigation Plan will include the monitoring plan and protocol, as well as an invasive and
exotic species management plan. The management plan will identify potential invasive
species as defined in the "North Carolina Noxious Weed List", identify site constraints,
and provide for a two-part control plan. The first part of the two-part plan will suppress
the establishment of noxious plants through eradication of existing species seen on site
and installation of sufficient densities of native woody and herbaceous species. The
second part will be to implement an early detection and rapid response program, to
identify and remove invasive species before they become established.
Monitoring will be completed using random permanent sampling quadrants as outlined in
the Mitigation Plan for a minimum five-year period, or until success of the project can be
validated. Monitoring Reports will be submitted to EEP by December 31 of the year in
which the monitoring was conducted. In the unlikely event that success criteria outlined
below are not achieved by the end of the five-year minimum monitoring period, with
permission from EEP corrective measures including regrading, replanting, removal of
certain species, etc. will be performed. If areas are deemed to be severely deficient in
meeting the success criteria, Albemarle Restoration, LLC may opt to ask the Department
to allow corrective measures prior to the end of the five-year period.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC. 11
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
9.0 Success Criteria:
Success of the project will go beyond the establishment of wetland hydrology and a
predominance of hydrophytic vegetation. Because the goals of the project are to create a
diverse wetland system, the success criteria will be tied directly to those goals. The
intent of the project is to create a diverse wetland forest, interspersed with small areas of
emergent wetlands, shallow open water, and hummocks. We believe that the creation of
this diverse system is necessary to provide the range of intended functions and values.
The primary indicators of success will therefore be the establishment of a range of
wetland hydrology including inundated, saturated, seasonally saturated, and upland
hummock areas. Approximate acreages for each wetland hydrologic regime are shown
on Sheet P-1 of the Restoration Design Plan Sheets. The site will be deemed successful
if the acreages of each regimes fall within a reasonable range related to the design during
normal climatic conditions. Site hydrology during years of excessive rainfall or extreme
drought will be assessed with climatic conditions in mind.
10.0 References
Albemarle Restorations, LLC. . Albemarle Restorations field data collection
within Martin County, North Carolina. 2005.
American Association of Nurserymen. The American Standard for Nursery Stock. 1250
I Street, N.W., Suite 500, Washington, DC. 1986.
Landscape Contractor's Association of Metropolitan Washington. Landscape
Specification Guidelines. LCAMW. Rockville, Maryland. 1993.
Lynch, Karen M. "Common Wetland Plants of North Carolina." NCDENR, Division of
Parks and Recreation Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality Water Quality Section. Raleigh, North Carolina:
Report # 97-01, August 1997.
McGill, S. "Technical Proposal Bid Number 16-DO5024 Modlin Property."
Albermarle Restorations, LLC. Gatesville, North Carolina. 2005.
North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Plant Industry
Division-Plant Protection Section. "North Carolina Noxious Weed List."
hU://www.agr.state.nc.us/plantind/plant/weed/noxweed.htm. September 2005.
NCDENR, Division of Coastal Management. "GIS Wetland Type Mapping for the North
Carolina Coastal Plain." GIS Data Guidance Document.
http://dcm2.enr.state.nc.us/Wetlands/wtypeguidanceweb.pdf. September 2005.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC. 12
Modlin Property Riverine Wetland Mitigation Plan
Roanoke River Basin, 03010107
Martin County, North Carolina - February 2006
Revised, May 2006
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources(NCDENR), Division
of Water Quality. "Roanoke River Basinwide Water Quality Management Plan."
July, 2001.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, NCDENR, Division of Parks and Recreation.
"Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Animal Species of North Carolina."
1999.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, NCDENR, Division of Parks and Recreation.
"Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Plant Species of North Carolina."
1999.
North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program. "Watershed
Restoration Plan for the Roanoke River Basin." North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR), Division of Water Quality.
2001.
Riddick, Lisa A. "Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Modlin Property, Poplar
Chapel Road Jamesville, Martin County, North Carolina." NorthEast
Environmental, P.C. October 10, 2005.
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service.
"Martin County Soil Survey." September, 1989.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service. "Martin County Endangered Species,
Threatened Species, and Federal Species of Concern." http://nc-
es.fws.gov/es/cntylist/martin.html. September 2005.
ALBEMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC. 13
CM it
PPOGRAM
June 13, 2006
Albemarle Restorations, LLC
Attn: Ed Temple
404 Court Street
Gaesville, North Carolina 27938
Subject: Modlin Property Wetland Restoration Plan
Roanoke River Basin - Cataloging Unit 03010107
Martin County
Contract # D05024-1
Dear Mr. Temple:
In May 2006, Albemarle Restorations, LLC submitted the subject Restoration Plan for the
Modlin Property Wetland Restoration Full Delivery Project. The project is located off Poplar
Chapel Road near the Town of Jamesville in Martin County, North Carolina. The Restoration
Plan proposes to restore 40.0 acres of prior converted cropland by restoring wetland hydrology
and planting appropriate vegetation to establish a bottomland hardwood forest. The restored
system will mimic the conditions found in riverine wetlands just below headwater areas.
The Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) has reviewed the restoration plan and has no
comments at this time. Please proceed with acquiring all necessary permits and/or certifications
and complete the implementation of the earthwork portion of the mitigation project (Task 4).
If you have any questions, or wish to discuss this matter further, please contact me at (919)715-
1656 or email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Guy C. Pearce
EEP Full Delivery Program Supervisor
cc: files
AK 4
RCDEWR
5i
Untied Sautes{: Depwbumt of Ageieuum e
o N RCS
Natural Resources Conservation' Service
104 Kehukee Park Road
Williamston, N.C. 27892
March 23, 2005
Mr. William N. Modlin
1841 Poplar Chapel Road
Jamesville, NC 27846
Dear Billy,
I have reviewed the soils maps on your tract 2087 of Poplar Chapel Road as it
relates to wetland classifleations within USDA. The acreage proposed for the
conservation easement is comprised of Bethera loam soil and was cleared for
row crops in the late 1970's prior to the swampbuster provision's of the 1985
Rood Security Act. Therefore this area of approximately 120 acres is classed as
Prior Converted Wetlands (PC) and is exempt from any USDA regulations.
Good luck on the wildlife enhanfements that may be planned.
Sincerely,
Vv
Rup W. Hasty
District Conservationist
USDA - NRCS
encl: Soils Map
Tract Map
156 EZ
The Natural Resources Conservation Service provides leadership in a partnership effort to help people
conserve, maintain, and Improve our natural resources and environment,
ea` o
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Presenation Office
Pdar B. Saadbeok, A?nisispdoc Oftitx of Archives and History
Michael Easley, Governor Division of Historical Resources
1.isbctlr C.. Evans, Sccrctary David Brook Director
Jeffrey I Crow, Deputy Secretary September 8, 2005

Scott McGill
Ecotone, Inc
PO Box 5
f arrettsville, MD 21084
Re: Modlin Property, Cooper Swamp Finn, Martin County, ER05-2015
Dear Mr. McGill:
Thank you for your letter of August 25, 2005, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
environmental review coordinator, at 919-733-4763. In all future
please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley,
communication concerning this project, please cft the above-referenced tracking number.
Sincerely, p
?Ik, U (J
Ln*-
?Pjztet Sandbeck
:?t 1 Savioa Cleota, Rakfa6 TIC 27699461? [phone]/733-a6)3
ApMINISTRATION B{•d Strad. "NO NC 4617 MA Sadao Cads: ftigi# HC 27689.4617 [phone]/715.4801
R1d,4TORATION 51511. Elmo Swam Ralelo Nc 4617M O Sarioe Oadar. Ra1e1sU 11C 276994617 (919)73345451715-4801
suttvEY & PLANNING 515 N. sled Shod. Raleigh,
' I
_ I
V
o
m ?o
?Ike I

O .,

vLi
DTm ? V t5 f 1
lJ . \ ? GP P?.1
?
2006
JUN 1 6
OENR WATER QUALilY
WETLANpSANDSTORMWATER6 \<

I
i ?

/
I I

M,gIN Sr

_
- I

f .
?,
64 ]AMESVILLE - -
-- ELIJAH LEE RD G
COOPER
A PRO 1
JECT AREA "I``?qM
P
SW - o a / I I RO ??
?? ? I
I
1 1 ` I
I I

WE
?i?L,y .Pa
/
I i I o

z
z I
I
i ?? ? I 4u

SCALE
0 4= eooo
EXHIBIT A
ECOTONE INC vicinity Map
, MODUN PROPERTY
RIVERINE WETLAND RESTORATION 40 WMU's
P.O. Box 5.12°4 9aldwfn Mal Road •Jarrettaville, Maryland 21084 Scale: 1" = 4000' 1/2005 Drawn By: LMS
[phone] • Fax [phone] • E-Mail i moleootonaimc m
i
z
N
m ?
f
o? o
m F-
?o
? co Z
= o k z O
r (3) N ° w a 3` g F- 0?
co 02 0
I c L. it
21 .1 2 Z Z? U m- v_ sr6$?? m x z Q
fII l Emrm}`me?Ea w P-4 QZ
CL
j m a W
z
U b
a Y 0 ^ W
m
-?-.. oc
z N
op Z ! ! z v °
H ?
o ^
W .. ?-
N
O p Y.. O
z r ?f
d o
z 52
v ?
N N
N o0
w?
V)
k _ 0
m
o
jQLLJ
z
s s o
.? co ,.r Z Z
W
I O
JUN Mh?)
Q
a
3 g
? N
•?' tip
J '
Q /q
F+'1 E. W 1
a?
mm
t
k ? ti?i4 t., 6 ? ~
:a !l
ti
LLP
a?
LLJ
ff.: , , r l
a
(l ?0'
r?
P. '?:, r
Exhibit D
Typical Views of the Modlin Property
fa 1.

Photo 4: Wooded parcel adjacent to Riverine Wetland Restoration Area.
3 pc? ??i9 NFL R
O (1 ? Sl c?
N
(? S (l o R
N

x
^' N
Ig
?0
I?
X
z ?
n
0
z
z

z
-77
C-7

3-- N (a - N < 3 CR , V z
73
o f -
Q E
z 4 E N ? ? ? ? R , (? ? ? ? N CO ? ? SL (a ? , - N ? ? ? ? n- Sl) SL 0 76 ? s
711
SL 7- 13
91 O ?+ Lt O ?Nt- {y
c?+' cT 3
RL \A
87 TIN ?,
G
Z
0
V _
c?
V

f
V.
??Q1?3 ll S 11)1--N
?
(
????zzzz
K5 Q
zz
z
X
O

C1
Z

0
0
? Q
0 ?
C
O c?
?o
OOH
ZZZ

z
n
O
z
77? 7-\\
7Ks
?O
O O
z
n ?
NINNVW ?,..
b'6 IN
rd-Al ,I
y?p1H1. I
-? ?p"W .-uexl onl

rtmmpar,PY:

ALBERMARLE RESTORATIONS, LLC
ECOTONE IN C. MMIN t kofffy
001W N tMP MITIGATION %F ffFf
UP'(20, 2006
-i WETLAND RESTORATION PERMUTING & DESIGN
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULnNO 40,0 ??
,
STREAM RESTORATION ,
,
FOREST&WETLLAND CREATION& stem LLAyN1
LIryy11J
Atl/1
AIA
ry \kV
- ,
& WILDLIFE HABITAT CREATION STREAM RESTORATION. L Eaa ?
I
I
N?
IYVRI VUV?I PA/f.if? /'Ll/l-IW1
M)ACOU14T.^STR[ET•(iAT1:9VI1.L.1',NC ?"M:MI P.O.BOIS•1R04111 W1 NM01ROA0•JAM[L'L LIXMMri 21064 Y?e'7??RY1A/?# YIOGJMA.
{ V?VI
I
V VL'
(20213390290• F AX(20E)397N 2 U10)6Sa7600•Fw (4I0)6&Jb. 03-[M iRIO.[cm mwNc.coM I.V. L AM .
l
N
I
i

c > >Q-
Q,) 1
cl?
''J '?,Jy I l WV n•.oa.i {y / WOD'DNINN9 NOWNI 11-609L'Ee9(01""d-0094.969(01V) T,(TItw(eq?..) xtld. 961-61,, 6521
-W0/ '70U•#;MNO)dll }? ? 1 I l ?. i t VBOIL aNYIAYVw ?ev??"?Ywr.DYDa new N?MQlYa ror, -s,a'o'a {n.(VeDN'A I IIAb:-11W) ?-f INl...1.Nno_ V
S O0b tII???A?{? [Fi. 'NO{LYYOlVVA1AX "YA.9 NOIlV3N3-LSAH v3H-'s
wil bNlIOdd) Ni?ON'A? 7NIkIdW $No6LY1YJaNY117M$isaYO? NOLLOlf;:NWV3N15
F •NOla94$aNII.IJWYHd'flNLLlflaNO?T/1N7WNOYUN3 NOIltlHHOL101S7L10Ntl713M vxmm 900Z'OZktdiM?4jj NOMNdWIWINWAIJ 3NO-LOD3 333'SNOI-LYHO1S3831NYPY83gly
MIIAAAo WlJ 9NIOX WIJO d N11QOW 9;
Aaa ,a ??
SUF
? a #E v?,?0 i ? ?
A U -qtr,; ? - ? o>v `
- ' Sea
'W"
any jvi
1
?? •• % Ug1t ? V d
?.. 7 A(? r J ?V J
10 000 10
1 10
1 ?
x eA5 J
x
r
/J ?$ 11]
\J
15
?ko
O? /q25 n5
' A
A 3.5 g5__? -? \._ ?. k _..
ElIQ v??? C? / A 5: S
~ A
_S
00
10
46,
? ZZ
40
16*

/ w'V n'Itl:W.i woo'o +u oloolWluvrvwa. 6094269(01 V) xvd•0094269(014) la w/4f:2.1)xv l•a4tnti:.:
/
-L77Y.'O JO/
?? "' NN tt;p?""^w) `^11 r I. I i? I S !
Y' ?.
1 •901La-A-W'>rnlA-uvf•avoa'f'IIW NIMalvs vor 1.9 xoa'o'd NF'f4/:NJ'i IIIAS:: I.I.V' •1: 1: Nllf.'11111UU bUb

\/
?IN1WON) '1 I11YMl I If`WI/1'1 ?IIIWIA?
V?1 IOW?'I /W 1'?IUI ?\IKIVII .

I -Nouvao197tJ wvnuls NOIlV3ND IV l9VH AAl-lOllAA W

l
N

nil ??
???Il SO,
• g NougaO aNvl17M 419fagj
'
' NOllVHO
MA i WV3N1S
'
7,/
SP
0'0b ` NDlsxo g DNIWNW3d
oNU7n9Noo IV1 ANNOWIAN3 NOIlV?101S:AH 11NVlLlM _
' IV `
-
9001
O1M>rM1 Al NOJV%IV JW11W INOIM 9NO1OD
g 011
SNOlld21015321 3
121VPVY381d
NVId 9NIM9 MOM NI1QOW _
W(lVdAAl. WL

I
HE
'6x 1 ¦

OF I
? I
e
I
I 1
I \
z
n
r
?1'
Iq
N
S?

?5
X
N (
In
l4ox
?U.?
r?
? i
?'i??? n? I¦i
i
¦
?X' o
o
(ll ?? II
i
? II
i
?X
i z
¦I
n
d
i
\ I? ??,•••I"r
I
v. ?
LO
? nom"
rlix
?? nn
riX Q g

Lc)
I-X
h
?LO
1E v,. O
4X
o ? o
gs
? z
n?
x?-
i
N
LO

,1) r
i
j
¦?
71
w r? to "? ? i
v w dX ¦
Lq
?o
M o` \
?z ` MX

//7 WVX'1()M .1 ONIXNMOOXNINI I)VN+X.HOYLSlY (O IV) XVJ.OO9L'd!Y)O IV) LONG'/-R.GL)XV_I .OV?(,.... (L.aL)
'1Z070 #? ( ?'d.?.? ?r l? ) VBO IL ON-vw'lTX vvvr -ow TIW N-,Vv VOL I.9 XOY-0'd WWZ -AIIIAiLV I•IA-111NlI1-6OV
+ ?1d :#K7?I1A1W ?q??/1 ??v,??? J ( ' 'NOLLYNommm VIvAlu.9 NOIltl32J31tl119tlH 3-A1'IOIIM$
?m
3N1S t?
VI1I10W) R) NUAV/1 1I?a??C? ` $NOLLV7Y
S;K3 ONYUAM 9 IXIIWOxI NOIltlN01SNOIltl2J01S3N Wtl 3M
I1il\ `r 'NVI"G9 DNLL11W217d'DNLL-insNO3W NNNNOYIAN3 '3N ONV'71
?N17d0Ob l
900Z'OZMvwl? NOl1N MJW11WINOIAIJ •?? 3N01O3 D33 `5NOllVHO-L53N 33YVPV8997b
W1a %1M )JJAJOJJ N116OW
1,
g>v
I ?/,.
x t'/•
v ) ? •? b?
???: 0010
r1q
If < S. Lq
u u
LO
LO
X
ah L G?, v
%.on to,
an
fty
n ??

vi
IVV X'II?:i.l ONI]NOlOOl Nl lIVYq. EOO4'EE9 (01?)%vd.00oL'EE9 (01?) itXN LSF: fruT,l %V.1.OLT.OlEti flVll -
1-Ho60Q'ulM1N ) jl ?BOIEONYAIYW'TIIA?LIIYYYI.OYOtlTIWNMOIYO?OEI.G%00'O'd N:f l.:)N':1111 fal.V!).1=1:1/1.1 .11I UJVUV
I?I?'??vl//vv,,I? 'NOLLVa0lomm WVaW9 NOLLV-3HO-LV-LIOVH 3d1IOlIMY
??'IVO,N tII?.?4iSf),. Ip NOLLYiYOaNVwMlg if7ro3 NOII.VaOlS3a WV3N1S
f 'NOIl7Q 9DNLLUWY7d'DNLL'1nfNOo 7VLJiW NOLIAN3 'NOIltl2101S3L10Ntl-113M
S1??d 0 Ob
9001'OZam it NO MMJW11WINON 9NO LODg 3-1-7 `SNOI1b'2101S32133?1dW21391t/
NN1d NM /UJA Did NI1QOW ?, Aa a?da?e rrd?e
z 75 p"P,?
r\
?o I I' -
I 6x
10 J ow 10 Lq
oooo
10 Ln
j
10 10 vlq- :27
\I J
e/
LO X /
/ LO
r,, I
I?
X
?ooo
(o low
14- i
i x
Lq I i
i
•,? << 1A i

J
O I
WvH-11 I WOD'JNIENO VOWN1'I-9094269(0 IV) xvA-008L'49(0IV) UnN/V?'R.zl xV:l•aVlot.LF: W.,.)
??oy0a #Javw) t, I I E YPoILaNYitlvW'mutLLlYYVf•avOtlTiWNMRY9VOL1.9x09'O'd nNINJ'alllAtillV`l•IINIISIN t):)41)V

WNI.OW) N1?ON '/JN ) NM ?
SA?O
? uvabl amv-LL M9lo
1M lnaod
4 Nouviad NOIl V119VH IM9
NOUVMOIlVllO1S3N Wvilml V 32115
,
l
[Ii `
I -oNLLi
'NDIg41Q 9NLLLWtl7d DNLLlf11N0'J •IVlN7WNOYlAN3 'NOI.LVHO1S3N?NV-113M
S??d o Ob ?
900Z'OZI lA NOWWWQNdUNINIMIJ 9NO-LOD? 3-7-1 `SNOllb?1O1S3213121dW?J381b '

sNXA,JW+ IYJIJ /w1joM NI1QOW AO6lWdMJNV'Id

n

d ?

? Q

Z
v-=
0
?o
?S

r?
v
OAR
y

111

g , ? ?

n
L 7
U U
U

00 N
0?0
0? ?N

O n
?
o
O ?
z ?? >v??

W VM'll )Y.1 woo'ON11NOL 40YN1'1N 909L049 (GIV) "A -0024,869 (0 IV) (160 VA 'We- 011I
?-?Zo6oj'#l)v )Al raolaONV,.rrw'lT+uwarrrr..---1WN-veroa)•v%09'o•a --Z11/1!AIVI•1:IIH.L-l"ll--
-

1??In/1)NufAV11??y,?1A?
\?NI
I/1N)flK7?IY ?1?y/y,? AJNV l* *31S( ??

` 1(!1 `J TT
FL 'NOLLVYO.u1N Wv7Y18

NOLLvm 0OmNVUAM RL "HOA
NVISAGQ flNLLUWY7d''NLLin$NOO'IVJN)IWNOYlAN3
'

9
0lS3"
3dlHIS
NOIltl3N01 19V
NOM IV Wtl3H1S
'NOI1VN01S3HONV-1l3M
ll?

_
9002 `OZ aviM l? NOMl11W Qw11w INOW l rD 3N010.?3 all `SN011d?1O1S321 31YVPY21381d

W015 dw SUld vildoM NildN _ Aa aiwa w W'W

-- --?
V7 _n 1
>v >v
v?v
z0?
?r, A5
_7
1 ?.
v-
o.
Z N ?"
i
i
i AS

I
----- - -----
`r.
` U
I I I,
N N N N
L
?
U
U
v
00
0 ? ? N

z

415L

?6 ? ? - - N t6

WYN'lf)W.1 WO7'7NIaNOlO7a90IN1?ivwa.f09LZ19(0 IV)"A-OO9L$99(0IV) ZePh?L4t, cel?) xv. 1•PbZfH:f:f: 2!ZI
L
-bZ0y0d # I?,/IVLUI?I^I/?) d11 l ? l ( i
l ?
? ( 4 I
' roolx oNV urvw'm naullNM1r. rod ? lw NIMR ve ....... o9'o'd -Z -'I I IA-- ..Li?N1S J MI-1 V- ^ 1
?Y?/1 ??W???
I ????N,?
\?
-I/1 ?
?
.
,
1
?
, 'NOLLVtlo117L W"Mls NOIIV3HOlV119VH 3411011M W
H0163H wV3N1S
,
gllll ul7O
I
1N) I'U) Nµgyl)
VN
C
tii3 S1O` ,
?B NOLLV7aO aNVLaM Q JAZHOd
ONLWWtlad'DNLL-IOtNODIViNfwNOil1AN3
NOIlV
'NOIlVHOlS3HONV-113M
ND19apB
l
900Z'OZkml NOMAdWIIW NNINO '?IVI 3N01ODg 3-71 `SNOIIH801538 3121b'W?I391d

SNOM dW Alld WiDd N11QOW AaaWdMd Wld

>L
I,

l )
1(?
1
a? }

0
II ??
o?
1N?
R?
rlzx

XI'7
1001,
1 J _
V Yom. •?[^?'?..© -Vf •,j.?
t
L

1 -

I »
I

1
1

-
? 1
1

I
I

fl
og?,
v==
?o
0
s
0
J
N
tl
N
N ?
N
q,
N
° IR
x \
N -
p1 -S
NU
wv M'l A1.., woo'ONI•N-III -Nl 11- COGL'L69 (0 IV)"A-WGC'a••(0IV) ZtnR.'/St (x .Z) XVA•NVT.o4:I:4: CM;l)
-L7oloA'# I'A/`I????1'11'I'I 4I. ?11,I [ ?1.\. I?1I It I 1 p YBOIaaNYLY?w•mu{1L1rwr.aroa'?Iw NIMO'lVe roll----0.- Irt:aLl.:JN'A nlnSalV?.lai W11; Hnoo vov
??? v
\? YYI/(Li?(/''77 UUy/y?11'?VnL7?llinF/J IQI AV,A^,?' {F r F??/? ??` ' IF 'NOLLVUOMMU NOI1tl 1tllS3H V:gMlg
U LV±Od NOll OlltlilOlS32JWtl3N1S
yl\'4/GV?NfWII'ul'/Y??NWAVII T gNO NYUI
{ 1 'Ng)f741@flNLLilWWMgd Yid lemonMgNLL7f1lNOD O'J ?v1NiW NOilIAN3 'NOI1tlil0163lJ ONtlII3M
5110v oov I )I"
9M'09 kYdIMdQIA NOMWW QMf11W VIM 3N01OD3 ? ill `SNOI1d2101S321 3121 b'W 213914
•??'
NVIJ UNdla MOM NI1QOW ? >,a awaw W-W
y '
77
t 1. 11 7 90
) )
t
'ti; .I •?I?I ? f
CJ S ) ir• 3 'I
/ 1l? ) ? ry?l I' r T ? 1
I ri __ _ 'yI • ?S \ t
?) 4?al-
/// - - ) 1 ) _) LI
I•
)
rt
t•
O
V ) )'I I'ii, , , c \rI
) )
l
X
T ? ? T )
) t' T )
•
II ,
) ? i 1??? Ir' 1 off 1,•'' ''
T .I'' tl ) ) ) ( ;III 1, ' ?' \
I. .
It?t'I f ?' ^ I - qcY
r
41
V ) 4 ? \
T )
/,0000(
i" c
900Z 'OZ MVTN I4
SIYJJQ UWIJ
o2?c
w N
U '-` LM
Q O •3
0
Q C? c?

G
w
w
IU)
Z
Z
w
Q
a

E
m
z
0
E
O
0
a'
0
m
-?ZO606 #1Nw) dll
VN110N) NkyON 'A1 m) NIkYdW
SXLV OOV
NOMA WIN INNAU
WADd NI1QOW
O LO 0 cO cO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
00 Il t` ?? Cl? M N N N N N
v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
co m Lq m M N N N N N
I?L?l.111). ll',l lt`,?
u??N A?uOAANI'llVw-a•FU9L:Z6910161 %Vd •0091.-ZB9 (f){b)
bUOIZ NNIVUtlVW'TnIAH1.1.3tlxvf -N-W NIM-NbOZ{ •9 xoN'O'd
V NOLMAN3 ONV'113M V 1S3NOA
'N•JIS30 V SN{711 W N3d '•JNI1lf1SN0z) I Vl 3 W NONIAN3
'DNj 3N010D3
o LO LO LO LO to c0 cn c0 J
N 0 0 0 0 0 0 CC
0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0;
III
0 0 LO LO 0 LO U? U O
N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
IDII
t
U) 0 LO LO 0 LO LO Fn to LO 0 0 to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fn
co 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn
2
>. m m E ti E
m C7 m>
2 rn U v rn m
? ? ? N Q C ?
CL 5, E cu E
TL Q. 0)
N
c N 3 C m cu
Q w m U Q U w m u.Ow
N
rn
U) L
N N
7 m Ili
m m
+; :3 C/) Y c 'o p
V5 sK
cn v M
w ? i (n a v ? m-j c°n
c
cu v `M° m co
z co () 'Z ca E C 'cu ' ° ac0i aci CZ Co CCO co a?i
2 ° ° .c_ ° ° E E ,° cn ? to ° a
e) ct, u CO co (b
t 13
it .0 N- co
cu :z
o
• cco cu c
C, o .e c ? c •?
?QaQwaQ?wn,cicn cn?(i?wU?(i?
ZNIML9E (ZW) XVA • Bb'l.0£EF (99J.)
-WI,: '3'1'l1AFll.V?•13:1N1F 1NO0:)6f16
311 fSNOI-LVNO1S99 319YPV9391V

to b? to
a
cop) V) a
V) n ) a W) wl vi V?

? O O
GX Lx O
C. O
LG O O
C P4 O
C. O
P4 O
4Yi O
F4 O
Fri O
W
U? N ^? N CJ .
fV fV CJ fV N fN N (V
L

O
+.?
2
?
?
?-

?

°?
8
8
8
C F4 04 W W W a c?! x x

U a1 00 C? 0.? 0. GQ ?G Ca GQ f? ? GO
? N v? v? v1 v1 "v, ?n 'vl "v?
N vl
N "In
N 'v) ?n ?
? N N N N N N N N N
S
C7 ? y ? ?

a
0 a? _

~
E ? F m C)l O U a,
? A °
JAI En 3 x cn cn > aa

z

• o Z o
O )` ? O Obi N N U "~?

'It d o

V'1 o?o `O
00

d

O?o
?h

o?o

u
d

°
?t
U, _ I - I ? cv

00 1 061 - M,
N
?I?A
2L G ? b g g
o
-Z U 75
fl '? --6
U1 U ? -=

i?. a a a ? a a ?
V
(?
.b .b
.b b
.b
.b
b
b
fV fV CJ (V fV fV fV fV

N N N N N N N N
i
? I
w
z
_
.z

?b

3
?I
U
cn
o o Q x p •° aj
S?l U
aaH
3jco
c?
un
x a?
(A
i

z

V o Z 2
O
IP
? ? N CS
U O ? ? tl
wz? •
_

M M M M M M M M ct

ay ? l

N
,n
Y
WYN"1flM.f ` e W07'ONIYN01001p?Nl ?fVW?I•EOGI.-RO9(0IV)"A-000L'E69 IOM T.f 111(1S1)YYi•9V--(Z5Z)
'{1ZOy0Q'#?. ( ?'(,??? t ?'I ?1 ?{;? 1 1 I ?GOIE ONVIAYYW'lnlAauallYVf •OYON TIW NIMQlY9 >OE{•G YOG'O'd WWZ ZM':i' IIIAGJIV9• AAHISJNf10:)V-
lug NOIlV3HDIVlIBVH 3AIldlIMV
?rt,???7 'NOLLYYO1f7M K"
VIYI AI ?IIIA/N /W'I MI?Nl+aV11 ???? \ \1? ` 1@NOLLYaYOONYtIiA& R JAXMOd NOIlYNOlS3lf WV3N1S
11 77` f 'NOIG741@ONIlLWY7d 'oNLLV1GN03T/1NZWNOVIAN3 NOIIVHOI&71H ONV713M
900Z'OZk'NTf IJ NOMWWQNVIUW INN ? •D• 1 ? 3NO-L OD:4 X77 `SNOI1V2101S3?137NVP18387V
l odd NI1QOW
A
HO
00 ? ?
??byA3N ?i,- S1L U\ V\ O ??
i a, J Q N p
i n2?1 O cp
O ????S?flS?SLSL \ C L?
'M l3dVHJ 4 x _ _ _ _ ?G Z
off,
? THIQCET
oll,
MANNI he ?. A \ V
gI l?r ??-

o z

0 0

z ?

Q

z
O
v
z

0
O ?
v
?O
O ?
O
O
O
r

? fj,\, -/ )
N
S 0 U\ L L LL 0
4-
z 75
fl L +I O S1L U> g U N 3 ?? ° L N 3 L V
g c L- eGi e?i 3? 3 e3i N z +?
Ill -- L 5 N N b-_ U
e? Sou n S? 3 L ° o? v 3 vo
N S?? U O 7 FF a 43 l1 c? N +o? iN1. U L 3 N +?
L N° U b S VI i U t SU qj ML t j )U 3
L J,
- ,ll L
Q'.>_ U N N> 3- S N N b L U L
N - ° $ N E s L E- E N a
75
L b '? S1L 111
b F > N Ill N IU 16 p_ U N 7 L Q L V (6
z N U U U +? L >> tl 0 s U U U L 0 3
1 \
N
S] o
1U
SZ
N

? ? N p
L
?L?
E 3:
4p _ N
v v S
6 N N N lS
Ec_ 6 SU "
L Uv L +? 6 6
L ? 1V
z ?
z
,o
z
O
z
x