20070235 Ver 1_Application_20070207

20070235
Agri WasteTechnology, Inc. (~,;~n Ar- ,-
I IlI lblll_~
5400 Etta Burke Court RECEIVED
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]/2007
www.agriwaste.com
Email: [e-mail]
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
United States Army Corps Engineers
6508 Falls of Neuse Road
Suite 120
Raleigh NC 27615
Division of Water Quality
401 /Wetland Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC, 27699-1650
Dear Regulatory Agency,
Jeff Vaughan, Senior Soil Scientist and Julie Peele, Environmental Technician of Agri-
waste Technology Inc. are submitting this PCN on behalf of Kent Wiles. Mr. Wiles has
purchased a 60 feet easement in hopes to use it to construct an access road to a land
locked piece of property in Orange County, NC. This access road will lead to a planned
subdivision containing four lots. The subdivision cannot be constructed until the access
road is built.
This proposed access road will cross approximately .12 acres of a riverine wetland
associated with Price Creek. In addition to the .12 acres of wetland impacted,
approximately 60 feet of Price Creek will be affected.
Included in this application are applicable maps, wetland delineation datasheets, and an
acceptance letter from the Ecosystem Enhancement Program. If you have any questions
concerning this application please contact Julie Peele or Jeff Vaughan at 919-859-0669.
i cerely,
~~~~
]ie Peele
~~
~ Jyr,~1 .> '~ A
%# F~ ~~ ,~ ry) r ~ yy~ p ~ 'V
. , r~i
F` ~,
~ ~`.~°
~~
~~~
~',t{~ 5 r'~r ~ ~~u
~'ts;; t ~~/~ ~,

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
20070235
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
fir any parncuiar item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing ~~~~,ul'~~~~E~~T
RECEIVED
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: xationfriae 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), chec ~ ~ ~~m k k ~~ ~ ,. ;
dry ~ ~,~~~
II. Applicant Information `~ ~' ,. '~
1. Owner/Applicant Information :~;~:rae . _ ~~-,.~~,~~ ~,~;~~~~-~~
Name: rent Hiles ~«ci1~~+~1 °;~ ~0 ~T(~ t~i'~^„'~?~ 6R~A~1CFi
Mailing Address: Bois sutler Glen H=ive
Chapel Hill, NC 27516
TelephOrie Number: 919-370-7980 FaX Number: 919-338-1515
E-mail Address: brovhillrilesind~vahoo_com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: .T,,,;p ~,a
Company Affiliation: Agri-Tidaste Technology, Inc.
Mailing Address: 5400 Etta Burxe court
Raleigh, NC 27606
Telephone Number: 919-859-0669 Fax Number: 919-233-1970
E-mail Address: jpeele(agri-raste_con
Page 5 of 12

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: na,~aG~,s ('hnmh Road
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
9777135204
4. Location
County: orange Nearest Town: Chapel sill
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): T >; . 4-B o ~,,,; ,,_
level Rd. Take a right onto S~nithl v ~ d m k a i cJh ~ntn nam ~.~,~ r'F. h ua
P~rojeCt r a i s 9 mi 7 on 7 f nPYt to 7 S7 7 >l crw c (`h h RA ~ ('hawl Ai 7 7~ IaT^
Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.s74299 °N -79.095777 °W
6. Property size (acres): Total Hoes 9.37
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Price creek
8. River Basin: Cape Fear River Basin
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http:r"~'h2o.enr.staie..nc.us admill%maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: This area is a s-aall populated r r a r; h a ivs,rinr~
iretland located dovnslone.
Page 6 of 12

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Please see attachment 1_
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: To buila access road to a planned neighborhood
o£ 3-2 acre lots and 1-3 acre lot. This neighborhood is land locked without access.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.LP. project, along with
construction schedules. xiA Ac~yPVpr~ iisArnF. [~a,gp to the citn s,,, 1L.u-rnnhnT 7st f z~1n~ t:
in~t~rt the wPtlanrl r7Ptc~rminatinn marlP h$ AAT c[~ attar-hmwnt 4
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
None
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: .12 acres Will be impacted due to
the constrution of an access road. There will be culverts piaced every 100' in order to not
impede the sheet floc of Price Creek. There will be mechanical clearing, grading,of fill
dirt to build this road_
Page 7 of 12

2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
1 Adding Fill Dirt Riverine Yes 0 .12
2 Mechanical Gradin Riverine Hes Road - 0 .12
3 Grading Riverine Yes 0 .12

Total Wetland Impact (acres) .12
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: -47
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acrea>?e, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Im act Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
2, 3, and 4 Price Creek Fill Dirt, Mech_ P 4' 60' .001
ra ing

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 60' .001
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill- excavati~n_ dredQin~_ floodine_ draina~e_ hulkheads_ etc.
Open Water Impact

Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)

Type of Impact Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of

Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres) N/A
Page 8 of 12

6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the nr~iect
Stream Impact (acres): .ool ac_
Wetland Impact (acres): _12 ac.
Open Water Impact (acres): ra/A
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) x/A
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 60'
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): x/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): at/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. ~~+ impact development practices
will be used. For example, small footprint for planned hoses. Just enough trees will be
cleared for the homes, septic systems, and access road. Culverts will be added under the road,
Rain Gardens will be impleanented. on the sides of the access road. These small depressions
will slow down the funoff from the impervious road as the vegetation within these gardens will
VIII. Mitigation absorb the runoff. Initially, the plan called. for 9' ditches on either side of the
road, however, the road will be elevated and as a result no ditches will be needed.
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12

USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide. for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http:iill2o.enr.state.nc.us%'ncw~etlands!strm~ide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
tSitigation is not planned for this project, however, an acceptance letter from the EEP
is included in the application. I4r. files will be paving into the In-Lieu Fee Program
for mitigation_
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): x/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): x~A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): .lz ac
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): x~A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): u/A
Page 10 of 12

IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 1SA NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 1 SA NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 1 SA NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 1 SA NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multibliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(square feet) Mitieation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 1 SA NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. x/A
Page 11 of 12

XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious Level. see at+~~t 2.
~'ntal ~ immrsinns = 77$
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
TM omnosed ~rnhr7i~tuinn is ~nitrbl foL1l ~~1.1471i17~ gE~tic gyst~ Pith the ezo~mt_~~
.I~tl]~.~II~'~!Cr~_nortion of t~+eriy (see siL ten) _ ?his area is sv_itable for an alterna-
tive sfsta.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No a^
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ Na Q
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No Q
If yes, pIcase submit a qualitative or quantitative cum~ilative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
htt~alh2o.enr.statc,ne.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
Once the development is completed, there aze no additional ispacts anticipated.
XV. Other Clrcumstunces (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
..rlC~ ..0
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page l2 of Il

Attachment 1
Project Information
Question 10.

Attachment 1
20070235
III. Project Information
10. Mr. Wiles is proposing to use an easement in order to build an access road to a land
locked piece of property in Orange County NC. This easement includes a 20,SOOsq ft.
(.47ac) wetland area and 60 feet of Price Creek. The access road will lead to a planned
subdivision containing 4 lots. The subdivision will not be constructed until the access
road is built.
The proposed road is planned to be18 feet wide. As a result, approximately .12 ac of the
wetlands will be used to construct the road. Culverts will be installed every 100 feet as to
not impede the sheet flow of Price Creek. Building the road will entail the use of a light
utility bulldozer for clearing, grading, and a dump truck to bring in fill material. A
sedimentation fence will be put up along the border of the wetland as protection from
sedimentation loading.
The planned subdivision will begin approximately 600 feet upslope from the wetland.
Building the subdivision will entail the use of concrete trucks, boom trucks, light utility
bulldozer, and a dumpster. This will be a low impact development, in that extra
precautions will be taken to ensure the smallest footprint possible for these homes.

Attachment 2
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)

Attachment 2
xl.
2 0 0 7 0 2 3 5
Currently this area is completely pervious accounting for a total of 9.07 acres. The
proposed access road will consist of .12 impervious acres and the proposed subdivision
will have approximately .9 impervious acres.
Storm water controls proposed for this project are as follows:
1. Gutter curbs will not be used so that runoff will be absorbed by pervious surfaces
instead of making a concentrated stream towards the wetland.
2. There will be one driveway for all four homes. This low impact development
practice will decrease the amount of impervious area.
3. Rain gardens will be installed on the side of the access road. These small divots
with vegetation planted inside them will absorb runoff from the road. This
practice will decrease the amount of runoff that could impact the wetlands.

Attachment 3
1. Vicinity Map
2. Site Map
3. Quad Map
4. Map of Wetland Up Close
5. Cross-Section of the Road
6. Grading Plan

Agri-Waste Technology, Inc.
5400 Etta Burke Court
Raleigh, NC 27606
Ph:919-859-0669
Fax:[phone]
www.agriwaste.com
N
w~e
s
Wiles Property
Damascus Church
Rd, Orange Co.
i Drawn By:
Enrique Cachafeiro
Reviewed By:
Julie Peele
Date:
01 / 17/2007
1 0 1 2 Miles Scale: 1:50000

~~
©~®
Agri-Waste Technology, Inc.
5400 Etta Burke Court
Raleigh, NC 27606
Ph:919-859-0669
Fax: [phone]
www.agriwaste.com
N
WE
S
Wiles Property
Damascus Church
Rd, Orange Co.
Soil Types:
ApB,C- Appling
sandy loam
Ch- Chewacla
LoF- Louisburg
sandy loam
Legend ~,
2ft Contours ~'
Disturbance Types
~/ 1 Fill, Mechanical Clearing ~2
_ 3 Grading i
Parcels
Soils
N Wetlands Area
Drawn By:
Enrique Cachafeiro
Reviewed By:
Julie Peele
Date:
02/05/2007
vvuw. r •~+~+~~
N
0
0
O
N
W

Agri-Waste Technology, Inc.
5400 Etta Burke Court
Raleigh, NC 27606
Ph: 919-859-0669
Fax: [phone]
www.agriwaste.com
N
w ~ F:
s
Wiles Property
Damascus Church
Rd, Orange Co.
N
O
O
O
N
W
U7
Legend
O 65' Creek Buffer
Flood Zone
O 100 YR
O Property Line
Drawn By:
Enrique Cachafeiro
Reviewed By:
Julie Peele
Date:
O t / 17/2007
500 0 500 1000 Feet Scale: 1:3600

-- - __
!'[_
.,
~• fur '~ "_ . ~ E ~, . . , ~~.
Agri-Waste Technology, Inc. r . <, . ~: ~'~ r. } «'a ~ ~~ ~ e «~ *` IR ~i "~ TM' ,~: x:
5400 Etta Burke Court
Raleigh, NC 27606 ,~Y.... ,^ 4 -r ~ ~ 4 ~,~mF . ~y ~. ~ .~ _ "~ ~ r~ ~`.~ ,
i"'s'' t'
Fax: [phone] "' ~ ~~~m ~ r~ .~'~K I`„, i' " ~~ '~r!4~ >t _ .~,~ '~ ~~~'~t. ~",K.,.r~'• ~ ~
www.agriwaste.com ~ ~ ~,, ~ ,~', : ' ~ ~ ,o` v,.~ ~ ~ ~~ " ~ : ~j
,~j ~} .Y ,}"`
r rtn ' -~. ~ ~ iPr#
,r
~.
.M
1
,. ~_ .~ i _~ rK ~ e~ Y7
.-. i. c f 'd' ,,. _ ~ X ~ to ~ K e tiY .
-,. .,
. ~ ~ ~ '.~,
Wiles Property ~'4~~ s~~•~ d9,r~ ''!.j e.c ~e,~ nr~ ,.,fir= _ tl ~„ ;fr~x~ ~4 m -~p* 1 }IM r} '~ ~, ~
.~ ~'/ ~ ~~,f '.
` .
Damascus Church ~ ' • ~, ~~ '~`~ ,> y , ~ ' `~: ~ ^- ~~' ~~^~ ~ , " .~, - . ~~ ~ ~' ~~T'~ ~~''
Rd, Orange Co. : ~; ~ ~ , ~~~ ~~' ~ ~' ~-~~ ~ , , ~' ~: ~.. ~~.,
~~ ~ Q
n ~~ ,. !:, ~!`~{ p - S~;l, n elf r.lr ~ ! '.-_ ,~~'m" ~t j.
~ fit`, +~ „ '. ..;t • - t t .~~~; ;E' '~ ~''~ ~~, ~`~C~'-...~''~"` .:c,~,~
4 1 ~ ~ y ;rr ' # ..:
0 - 'tom + r ~~ ~~ i s .. ~ a ~-;- s! ,'s ~ ,If .r , ie .~ Fitt ~ i~; t"d~ ~ ,-Y= ,.a• .-~a' a ,
.
I z~ ~ • ~
-+r'~ +r.': yt° ~1 ~~ "fir ~; t
.,,.. Y , , , rt^
. .~
N ., ~~ - ~~r" ~~~r ~y f =~ ~ `, ~ ter. ~t ~ '~"`~*~ ~' ;, ~~~. r. ,'` ~ ~`.~ ,,' n -• "'~~ ~
i ~ r.
CJ1 ~a. ^'~3 x.. a~ a, ;: ,a !~ - ."Mi~~',..,f `~ .~, .. ~ ~ ~ ,:,~'',' - hr= M a ~ ~$ ~,.~ ~y J..~ .,
.'t ~~.
~'
~' ~v .~~ f ,r_ L ~:.,,,,'~.#s~ ~j, ~ ~~ ll «,~ s.we R~~ :A~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ /~ ~.y ~ a j~+` `~ ~ .
.x
~~~ ~~Q~~'p~r" .. _
{
1" ! T .
„ t ~ . -~ ~ :
J '~ ~ 1 gi'n`. ~ ,L' y ~ ~ `.~~ .. ~~ ;,Fir n ~~ .:~~ rt~ w Fy. ~ -S y ~p s
~~a~ ~ ~~. ~~ Y -
2ft ContOUrS ~~d» s~s~'~~c~~~~ 'a,~^ ~-~ " ,~ K. 4 yKT't,~ 1.~, I ^ c ti C° ` ~ ~~ ~ ~e ~~t .~+' t' ''
++*.~ F '~M ~ - ~ " ~ • ~ 7 ~ ~~ sir e, ~ ~ "~ ,,,`. '~ . . Y ~• r e~ ~ +~!'. ~ 1Z ~ F rX ~ i ~..: d 1 ;
'~+ .. ~' /r -~ ~A. *r- a, _ ` i .~.. ..~ s~. `~ Y, + ~ ,r r ~„ ~ i~ "~" w ,~~ ~
N Wetlands Area ~ r~ t ~ ~~+:'~f,, i. ~ SP.. ~i > ..s ~ .~~. ~. ~ w -~w - a" ,.T,,, ~~
~~ '"1 .YI r ~ ~
F ,- ~. n,, y~q~!
L " ~"
Drawn B ~ ~.s e, ~~`~ ,,.t k.,~t~ y13. ,~ ~ ~~ °. j •~"" ,y~, ~ ~-`Y e-.~~~"~~ 'IIM~ "f~~ +3 ~,~,~~ o~"y/,' a. ~;' ~~'~~
Enrique Cachafeiro ~ ;~ ~a' ~* ~ 4/ ": ~ t~ .~ l~rE ~ ~/~e~ `~ d. :* '~~".~~ ~` "~` ,~ "mw , ~ ~,~"'~
Reviewed By: ~ . , ~` ~ a ar- y ~. ~~..,p- ~ i ~y} t~~ ~` ~ Y' a~/t'°a ~,
Julie Peele {,
Date: ~t.:f`r.J~s'~r~lli~~~i~c,~'~°D~. ,~ `. ~,,s~-v~ } v ;R1~y'~ 'fir i ;a't~ry.f~~~' .'a "^!".+ `'~.~~,_~"r~ '~~
02/05/2007
~~~ ^~ 50 0 50 100 150 Feet
Scale: 1:1000

~_~
tf4
it~5
IQO
EX, ~RA~E
~1~~'t ~d~VT~3L j~' Ic7'
NaT~s : t~ PRaP. CRoss-s~cr~dN ~s ~ 1~~fsEA nN s~/~ ~~y~b T~?Pv,
z ~ Ec~'v~'T~ofvs ,~~~~~ ~E~~ s~~ l.~ v,~~ A~'~" Assv~~'D,
~~ C~~ss-s~e~~onf c~~~.c. ~NA~vG~ ~~- sw~,~c~s ~~~`~i~s-~~r
DR C U~ v~ 2~` ~s ~i~rs~~ c ~ ,~D
~) ~ ~ I I nn a..~e.~r ~~.E ~ ~ k 1 b~ cgs, ~ ~-t~~- ~• ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~-m e~!
~~ ~~.

. I 2 0 0 7 0 2 3 5
a ~ ~- ~ ~
`'{ w w

' sac
~
~ ~
'
~
~ y
`
~.
i
, O
~ ~ ~.
~
~'
' ~' ~ Y~
f
~~' ~~

c
t

.

;,

'~. _

~ ,
v, .,.

v~
~,
,~" "

.. ~.
?
/' P

~~ `
}

~' ,. ,. Y
~ ~
R
'"~^~~"~
~~
~;
b > .<~_ 4. , ~ _ -a ~- ti : 7- r {fit . ~ ~ „~ ~, ~ ~z .- °-~ ...
,~ ,. w.

o
a ~ o
4~
v ~' + +
f 3
' f
t
f
.€
{

7~ ~
F
r
e t

g
~ n
s` i
~ S

f
..
z ~
i`
t
. ' ; „A'
~y 'Y:.

y r
yt
~ ~
~~ ~ a rJ ~ .,. n `~ U ~ y.. i
a ~ w ~ " i.1 ~ °1
cx ~mci .~ Qa' ~`
U `l an ry R ~ W ~
~ ~~
a ~ ~ (4 '~'} ~ tY'
S~" C~ Cr Q- c+.~
2a®70235
p7
23,

Q~ n
CA ~ ~

J
o

t_
p
;;
~~~
m~a61 °o
m w rv
~d
~.~ ~ w m N
Out¢-~iDa
V
/~
~/!

Attachment 4
Wetland Delineation Datasheets

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Weflands Determination Manual)
. 0~
S~ '
4 .~~
~~ ~~.
Project /Site: ~tM~- gSC.ta-S C~~t.ttrt',j~ ~? o~(
Applicant /Owner: Lc.,
Investigator: ts~t, P~°+' ~ ~.~'~ V Date: (Z° ~ ~ o ~
County: r0~lt.nr„t.
State: N ~

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ~ No
Is the site significantly disturbed .(Atypical situation)? Yes No~-
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No~-
(explain on reverse if needed) Community lD:
Transect ID:
Plot ID:
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Saectes Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Saecies Stratum Indicator
~! 1 v'.da~bur
1._. ~ IASQ2 1 CTV rye -t; ~~"Ir°C••~1uo.~ ~j In ~cl c -k
9.
2._Norn beurll -C~-'(lx~`~nw,b~}vivs l5° ac 10.
3._i"YI;CyUS-EP~'~~un^'Ev~tl.ic. 30°<° ac+ 11.
4. ;m;•tea 12.-
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
-r
Percent of Dominant Species that are .OBL, FACW, or FAC excludingFAC-}. _ ~ ~~~~
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Species arelare not
Classified as FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands. Sample plot was taken....
HYDROLOGY
- Recorded Data (Describe. In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
/ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other ~/ Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12"
- No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
~/ Drift Lines
Field Observations: /Sediment Deposits

~ ___sL Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surtace Water:
(in.) Secondary Indicators:
Q
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
_Water-Stained Leaves

Depth to Saturated Soil: ~ (in.) _ Local Soil Survey Data
_FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Ezplafn in Remarks)
Remarks:

N~,~.
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): ~ ~ii~q ~ ~tbbuvo, ~ccnztvi (ors m Drainage Class: 1r.SQ.u !~'~~
Clavcykaol~n~'1' lc.~ m,~ ly~,t 1•r,~f~c(v!~}-~
Taxonomy (Subgroup):Ctivr - ~ Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_, No v
YLv ~ ~ c. - i f• i ro . --
Profile Descriation:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
finches) Horizon jMunseli Moisfl (Munsell Moistl Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc.
_~" ~ G~i blacw to ~ 1 _~m ~ ~~aa--~ ~
~'' A ~'~'1 I t7 y (~ z~ I ~- , r+1 D 5~rul-tT ts~i,r.-

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosoi _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon _~[High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
*~ Sulfidic Odor ____Organic Streaking. in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions _Listed on National Hydric Soils List
~ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _,__ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
~ r~ Uiu
G hewc~G1~
~~w~~ ~~ dti-a.~l
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes `~ No Is the Sampling Point -
Wetland. Hydrology Present? Yes ? No Within a Wetland? Yes / No_
Hydric Soils Present? Yes / No ____
Remarks: Location {describe) is/is not classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987
Army Corps of Engineers. Wetlands Delineation Mpanual.
(,~-G?~ %i~w.c.i ~' ,.`~ ~- Ll~-c- J3--c~' ~ LL~C~-,-~, ,~ ~fYL~~~.~~-- ~tl~ '" Q
/~~l i P) . ,Y A./ZI.C K.t_ ~A.,o~a.~.c_. ~ K-GC. LTYL ~ !YO 5.. ~~"-+3'+-~ arc-'f^- ~7tt K-c_ ~iCA.~,~
U ~
V

~~~
DATA FORM ~' ~° ~ ~ ;; ,? ~ w
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project /Site: .Ixt/Vi'IA.S~~S ~-~~,,U,v~,j~ ICI
Applicant /Owner: W <<
Investigator: ,,cam- ~ / Date: ~ Z-Z.~ - o (A
County: rzCre~
State: ~L

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes '~ No
Is the site significantly disturbed .(Atypical situation)? Yes No /
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No /
(explain on.reverse if needed) Community ID:
Transect ID:
Plot ID:
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator
1.. c51~~ i ~1 ~~e oP~l. 9.
2. , n y5 -~-a-e~c~ ~ ~ 10.

4._ /) 12..
5. 13.
6. 14.
7• 15.
$• 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are .OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). l0
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Speci ar are not
Classified asFAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands. Samp plot was taken....
HYDROLOGY
Recor ed Data (Describe. In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
- Aerial Photographs Prima Indicators:
_ Other `Inundated
/ Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: / Sediment Deposits
/ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surtace Water: ~ (in.) Secondary Indicators:

Depth to Free Water in Pit: ~ (in
) Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
. _Water-Stained Leaves
P
0 _ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil:
(in.) _FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

~v ~`~'~,
SOILS
Ma Unit Name ~ppl~ ~ ~,~;sburc~ s«,~ty Lowm
p cLla.~~ Kaof;n~~c. ~'hz./m~~ lyp~~ NaPlvdalls
(Series and Phase):~sv~sc'= /o~,~ rh; xul ~1,erM.~ R•~fi-~ Drainage Class: l>\f~.d.A_ p>~~
v I f-~ c Dy Si-raci, ~~
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No .f
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Lnches) Horizon 1Munsell Mo(st) (Munsell Mo(st) AbundancelContrast Structure, etc,
10'' ~_ Icy y ~. 2/ ~ ~~(

Hydric Soit Indicators:
Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon
J -/ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Suifidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions _Listed on National Hydric Soils List
~/ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Rei~m/larks:
Gb ~ ~ Gt/ti'~
~ /'
O~`~d'=-s~- ~e-e`' CG° ~~ ~,~lz~C~
,
iC/ /
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ~ No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ,_j/ No Within a Wetland? Yes / No_
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ~ No
Remarks: Location (describe~jis~lis not classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987
Army Corps of Engineers. Wetlands elineation Manual.
~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~-

Attachment 5
Acceptance Letter From the Ecosystem Enhancement Program

1r-
. y o stem
PROGRAM
January 23, 2007
Kent Wiles
3018 Butler Glen Drive
Chapel Hill, NC 27516
Project: Damascus Church Road County: Orange
LJ © 1 Q ~ \?
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Cazolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 444
Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's
responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be
issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work,
The amount of the In Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies
listed at www,nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
followin table.
Cape Fear
03030002 Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.) Buffer II
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm Ri arian Non-Ri arian Coastal Marsh
Impacts 0 0 65 0.17 0 0 0 0
Credits 0 0 130 0.34 0 0 0 0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If the regulatory agencies
require mitigation credits greater than indicated above, and the applicant wants NCEEP to be responsible for the additional
mitigation, the applicant will need to submit a mitigation request to NCEEP for approval prior to permit issuance. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Depaztment of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
Sincerely,
~. ~n1 ~,-
Wil ' m D. Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
John Thomas, USACE-Raleigh
Ian McMillan, DWQ-Raleigh
Julie Peele, agent (email)
File
RP~St-DYGf~t~... ~ ~ ... PYDtP.CtI,GI~ OGLY .~i~
~~~
~GDE~JR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / wvvw.nceep.net