20070222 Ver 1_401 Application_20070207

Pamela F. Faggert
Vice President and Chief Environmental Officer
Dominion Resources Services, Inc.
5(100 Dominion Boulevard, Glen Allen, Virginia 23060
Phone: [phone]
OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
January 29, 2007
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Attn: Ms. Laurie Dennison
Lake Gaston Recreational Day Use Area
Pre-Construction Notification Application for
401 Water Quality Certification for Nationwide Permit 39
Dear Sir or Madam:
F,~,vr.~ ~ N T
RECEIVED
Please find attached seven copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) application
fora 401 Water Quality Certification for a Nationwide Permit 39 to cover proposed
excavation and fill activities for a recreational day use swimming area at the Gaston
Hydro Power Station in Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina. The completed PCN
application form, as well as an addendum to the application, a site vicinity map, site
sketches showing the day use swimming area, and photos of the swimming area are
attached. In addition, a copy of the wetland delineation report (with supporting
documentation) that includes this area (Area 2) and a $200.00 check to cover the
application fee are also attached.
Thank you for consideration of our PCN application fora 401 Water Quality Certification
for a Nationwide Permit 39. If you need additional information or have any questions,
please contact Kim Lanterman at [phone].
Sincerely,
q~e ~
Pamela Faggert
Attachments ._ 7 ~ ~~
~~. f~ t~ ofi°u~Mk,.~~~~-
{e €e si
Ry{~ 5 ~ ~;
1~;~~ M /t~ t° j ~.ll;~
~' ~ (• ;.
,n ', i~`-wG~t
. n:*~J 01r.IS'~4°A'i'lA:1 K~I~. bf~
'#F'~.~.-t .....
"'~i-
Dominion°°'
20070 22 2

ebc: Maria Gwynn-attachments./
Jeff Jeffers-attachments
Joe Peterson-a to ents
Cathy Taylor
Bob Bisha ~
Bob Williams-attachments
Kim Lanterman-attachments
File: Gaston/ENV 14/Pre-Construction Notification Application for 401 Water Quality
Certification for Nationwide Permit 39 for Day Use Swimming Area-attachment

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
20070222
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing ~/ ~~ ~ r'='~ v I V I
RECEIVED
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide Permit 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check hem;: ; a•t a ~
C ;. ~"~+Y t :"'s. a G.':5 f a ~^ ,~ J ~ '~`
E ti.:.=j .. ~1
II. Applicant Information
,._~ ~; ZOC~7
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Vir inia Electric and Power Com an `-'~"'`` °"`~~ ~` ~`~`'~~~~
g P y ~~ S'n4a;(+d~,T~'R BRANCH
~M1NE.r ~
Mailing Address: 5000 Dominion Boulevard, Glen Allen, VA 23060, Attn: Ms. Kim
Lanterman
Telephone Number: 804-273-3051 Fax Number: 804-273-2964
E-mail Address: Kimberly Q [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: See Addendum
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Page 5 of 12

III. Project Information
5
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Lake Gaston Recreational Day Use Area
2. T.LP. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Halifax Nearest Town: Roanoke Rapids
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): See Addendum
Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line,
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): See Addendum °N
attach a sheet that
°W
6. Property size (acres): See Addendum
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Lake Gaston
8. River Basin: Roanoke River
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: See Addendum
Page 6 of 12

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Excavation
and fill work for a swimming area that will be part of a recreational day use area on Lake
Gaston near the Dominion Lake Gaston Dam Facility (operated by the Gaston Hydro Power
Station). Equipment to be used includes along-reach excavator. The excavated spoils will
be de-watered onsite and then transported to astate-licensed landfill for disposal. See
addendum for additional information.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Excavation and fill work for a swimming area
that will be part of a recreational day use area being constructed on Lake Gaston near the
Dominion Lake Gaston Dam Facility1~erated by the Gaston Hydro Power Station). This
day use area is being constructed in response to the station's FERC re-licensing agreement.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12

1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: There will be no loss of use of
actuatic functions as a result of this project. There will be minimal, temporary impacts (such
as increased turbidity) to the water in the swimming area during excavation and fill activities
only. Excavation and fill activities will be completed in approximatelX three weeks.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year
Floodplain Nearest
Stream Impact
(acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) ( es/no) (linear feet)
N/A

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: < 0.02 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number

(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width

Before Im act Impact
Length

(linear feet) Area of
Impact

(acres)
N/A

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 0
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill. excavation. dredein~. flooding. drainage. bulkheads. etc.
Open Water Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on map) ocean, etc.) (acres)
Temporary impact
N/A Lake Gaston only from excavation Lake 0.49
and fill activities

Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0.49
Page 8 of 12

6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the vroiect:
Stream Impact (acres): 0
Wetland Im act (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.49
Total Im act to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.49
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
S. Pond Creation (Not Applicable)
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
See Addendum.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12

USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A - As previously discussed, the project will result in minimal adverse affect to the aquatic
environment. Therefore, no mitigation is required.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Page 10 of 12

IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federaUstate/local) funds or the use of
public (federaUstate) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* I Impact Multiplier I Required
fsauare feed Mitieation
1 I I 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
Page 11 of 12

XI. 5tormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20°Io, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
ht~://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12

~QOT0222
Addendum to Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
for Nationwide Permit 39 for the Lake Gaston Recreational
Day Use Swimming Area
Section II. Applicant Information -Number 2:
~~ ~'~ r~~ ~~~i
RECEIVED
Virginia Electric and Power Company has utilized (or will be utilizing) the services of the
following consultants in performance of work associated with the Lake Gaston Recreational Day
Use Swimming Area:
1. M. J. Price Construction -General Contractor performing excavation and fill activities
associated with the swimming area -Subcontractor to Heaton Construction.
• Point of Contact at M. J. Price Construction is Mason Price; Telephone Number: 252-
537-0244; Point of Contact at Heaton Construction is Paul Heaton, Jr.; Telephone
Number: 252-535-4053
Mactec Engineering and Consulting, Inc. -Consulting firm that performed the wetland
delineation for the recreational day use area
• Point of Contact at Mactec is Richard Harmon; Telephone Number 919-831-8003
Section III. Protect Information -Number 4:
Directions to the site are as follows:
Heading North on I-95:
• Take the NC-903 exit (Exit 168) toward Halifax;
• Turn left onto NC-903 and stay on NC-903 approximately 10.5 miles to US-158/NC-903;
• Turn left onto US-158/NC-903;
• Go 0.8 miles and turn slight right onto Phipps Drive;
• Go 1.7 miles and turn left onto Jack Brown Road;
• Continue on Jack Brown Road until reaching the Gaston Hydro Power Station (located at
2369 Jack Brown Road).
Section III. Project Information -Number 5:
Approximate coordinates for the recreational day use swimming area are as follows:
36.4952 N and 77.8110 W
Section III. Project Information -Number 6:
The total area of the recreational day use area is approximately 3.20 acres. This PCN is for a
Nationwide Permit 39 for excavation and fill activities associated with the day use swimming
area only. The total acreage of the swimming area is approximately 0.49 acres.

Section III. Proiect Information -Number 9:
The Lake Gaston Recreational Day Use Area is a predominantly open area located near the
Dominion Lake Gaston Dam Facility associated with the Gaston Hydro Power Station. The
recreational day use area is bordered on the north and east by the Dominon Lake Gaston Dam
Facility, to the west by Lake Gaston, and to the south by residential lots.
Section III. Project Information -Number 10:
The project to be covered by the Nationwide Permit 39 involves excavation and fill work for a
swimming area that will be part of a Lake Gaston recreational day use area at the Gaston Hydro
Power Station. The total area of the swimming area is approximately 21,344 square feet (0.49
acres). This area will be excavated to a maximum depth of five (5) feet, which equates to
approximately 3,952 cubic yards of excavated material (maximum) to be removed. The
excavation will be performed to level off the slope of the swimming area for swimming/wading
purposes. There will be no excavation work done on the beach/shoreline area adjacent to the
swimming area. There will only be minor grading work on the beach that will not affect the lake
edge.
After excavation activities are complete, the excavated area will be backfilled with sand at a
minimum depth of one (1) foot (approximately 3,162 cubic yards). All excavation and fill work
will be done below the normal pool area (i.e., below the water surface).
A long-reach excavator will be used to perform the excavation activities. The long-reach
excavator will excavate the material and place it directly into 30-ton trucks. The trucks will
transport the spoils to an on-site stockpile area for dewatering. Appropriate erosion and sediment
controls will be installed around the dewatering area to ensure that the spoils are allowed to dry
without any impact to the area from runoff. After the spoils are de-watered, the spoils will be
transported by 30-ton trucks to astate-licensed landfill. The name of the landfill where the de-
watered spoils will be disposed is Price Borrow Pit (903)/Landfill, located in Littleton, Halifax
County, North Carolina.
Based upon the results of a wetland delineation (report attached) performed for the Lake Gaston
recreational day use area (Area 2 in the wetland delineation report), there are no wetlands located
in or around the swimming area where the excavation and fill work will be performed. Therefore,
there will be no wetland impacts associated with the project.
Section VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization
A long-reach excavator will be used to perform the excavation and fill activities. The long-reach
excavator will deposit the excavated spoils directly into 30-ton trucks for transport to the on-site
de-watering area. This method will eliminate double handling of the material. No spoils will be
placed on the beach area. After being de-watered, the spoils will be transported to a state-
licensed landfill for disposal.
The project will also utilize existing access points and pathways to the swimming area, as much
as possible, and mats will be placed on the pathways (as conditions warrant) while the trucks are
using the area. The NC DENR approved Erosion and Sediment Control measures will be put into
place prior to the start of the excavation work.

Site Vicinity Map

~~NRlco
to Est
Q~N
~~^
s~~-r~
RoUT~
1214
~'r
~.
~s
0
~ ~ NoR7~~AMproN
~.. ~. ,.. G~N7Y
~~L11= ~ ~-~-Y~
1~A~CE C~ASTON
SI-~--E~~
C~ tea
~ti
~~~;D~i
~~ti
qP
y~~~
~~~~~~

VICINITY MAP
SCALE: 1°=3,000'
0
~~A~`~~
~ ~~~
., ~~
~ ~~
~~~T ~
~'9 ~
;~~.~ N
r „._
~,`y~

i- ~
n
G`a ~'- ~
~`
0
r•
'Q'~f Win' y ~t:'~
"
T._t, %
.._~..~p

_ ~~~
~ ~~
~ .. -~ ~ ~Sl~ N

.x
GASTQ N DAY U S E AR EA

Site Sketches

REMOVE ORGANIC MATERIAL AND DREDGE THE BOTTOM
WITHIN THE DESIGNATEp PUBLIC SWIMMING AREA.
DREDGING DEPTH TO BE A MIN. OF 9!0° ANp A MAX. OF
6D°. IF NECESSARY, THE CANTRACTOR MAY EXCEED
THE 60' DREDGE DEPTH TO REMOVE NATURAL AND MAN
MADE OBSTRUCT]ONS. UPON COMPLECION THE CONTRACTOR
WILL PLACE THE NECESSARY VOLUME OF SAND TO THE
LAKE E4OTTOM TO WITHIN IXJE FOOT OF T}IE ORIGINAL GRADE.
THE CONTRACTOR SSIALL VERIFY AND REMOVE IRREGULAR GRADE
CHANGES WITHIN 7HE SWIMMING AREA. THE CONTRACTOR
WILL PRCJVIDE AN AS BUILT-TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF 7HE
SWIMMING AREA AT THE COMPLETION OF DREDGING AND 7HE
PLACEMENT OF SAND. DREDGED MATERIAL WILL BE STOCK-
PILEp ONSITE UNTIL SUFFICIENTLY DRIED FOR TRANSPORTATION
TO A LICENSEp OFF-51TY FACILITY, pOMINION POWE,4 WILL
GBTAIN THE NECESSARY DREDING PERMITS. .
saFoty any
\a~ r ~
\Q~ ~
1
Q. I
~ ``
\ ~t
i ~ '~~ ~
q~~ `\ `9 _ _______ -
ZS' `` ~
~` `` ~` ~~` ~' 193--~ `-- ~~
``~ '192-_` '- - ~
~ ; r
.\ ~` ~`
~\ ` ~\ ~
`~ ` ~~ l~~
~ ~ ~~ ~ ~
200?0222

2007022
__---- i~/ ~~ 1\ I
_.~ _ J
LAKE GASTON ~~ $,~ ~`I ~ ~
LIMITS OF PUBLIL SWIMMING rVREA PoLY-ROPE AND FLOATS. ~' ! \ \
i
MAXIMUM p15TANCE i0 SHORE 15 APpROXIhiATELY Bd. P~~ ! X ~ " ~~
ANCHOR POLY-ROPE AND FLOATS TO A MINIMUM 25 L85. AND 3/S" ! ~ = ~ 1 \ ~ r~ !
STAINLESS STEEL GNAW PLACED AT MINIMUM 75' SEPARATION. t ~ ~ ~ ~~ !M~' (6 ~~~-~F~ I /
~fety ~y vJ~G/ , f((I//'rr-"-]ii 1v ~ I~~ '` \ ~ ~ I I 1 C
// IXISrING C-RAVELI~.WALK Ii \~ N 'p I
~' ~ H-LAP PARKING WITH ~ \ - U _ _ -V--YI ~ }
/ n \ CCNLRETE PAVING ,~ \ ~ v (Y-1---'~. i 1 ~ ~+ }
/ ~ ~ ~ j , ~ EXISTING SECURITY LIGHTING STOCKPILE V _ ~_ -- -`•~--- p i( j ~ ~J ' GASrON DAY~~ USE A: EA ; ~ ~
/~. ~ ~ ~ _ ~--/~'~- ~ ~ ~ N .mf ENTRANCE SIGN
. ~ ~/ r ~ y>~~-- -'~-~ J ~ t1 ~ } * ~ STS SIGN O ~
SWIM AREA - NO BOAT5 WARNING II ` ~ CONCRETE WHEEL STOPS TYP, ti p~ J ( 70+0 ~y
~. E-WAY A ONE-WAY p ~~
BUOY WITH ANCHOR ~ ` % ' ~ i ~ $ v ~..-rte ~ 151 N ~ AHEAD 51GN ~ - 11+00 ~
Iy~~,,_II
'Arm ~` / / / / / I 1. ~ ~ _ l - ~ ' ~ PA.BjERLINI
® / ^•- 00^11 RoA
/ .. ~ V •~ ?~. / 13 _ _ J 1 J~ '~ ~ f_, / T ! ~ ~. R3.a ~ N I I66.
~ 'TTP .5 o--T ~J _ ^/ ~ n IX ~~`'~C i E ~klJ, 4
Iii ~ t ~~ o ~ ` I "
~4 ~ - - l a l ~ ! d ~ A' c,, o ~ c+0 6` MI i I 'I~.
dry j ~ 0 0~ ~' o k ~ '
F ~ / ~ ~ ~.- ---~ ~ ~ .~" / {2) >b Nor o ~~f ~ ~r. ` I ~ '
PROPOSED TRASH RECEPTACL ~~ r ~ / ° ~` ~ ~ ENTER SIGNS d~ O ~ A ''! ~i~ \\ '
SEE DETAIL SHEET L-703 j "~ ~ S °- it Q~ 11 II
ter d \ ti '.
`\ ~
~~
LLEAN BEACH ANp SWIMMING AREA OF DELETERIOUS rGN r ~~ ~ ~ / i I% 1 ~ ' I
T jj 6.0' MIN. WIDTH CRU5HE0 ~ ~ I
MATERIAL ADD COURSE SAND FROM 7HE THE SHORE NE ~ ~~ b± / J-- GRANITE TRAIL .' ~ II ~ a ~ ~
APPROXIMATELY 30' MLANO TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF ' f/r ~ 6' ~ ~ 4 ~ ~! 7 Q ~ O X51`
9 INCHES. '
~na ~ ti~ ~ ~ `; ~ 12k~~~ ~ ~ ~~~
~ b.0' MIN. WIDTH CRUSHED 1 1 } J
GRANITE TRAIL / / •:•~A?~.^ e.- ~ i I ~Ia`~ PS ' ~7 I` I ~ -~t~ II
E5' EXPAN51CtJ OF EXISTING FlSHIkG PIER. ` i 15.0' WIpTW ONE WAY 1 }7 I
COMTRALTOR TO FIELD VERIFY PIER / GRAVEL ROAD b ~ T ~ ~~~'~ 9. / p ~ ~l II i I ~ j S i
DIMENSION5 BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH p• ~ J / O Q {• ~'' STOP ~IGN .~1 ~I S I
CIXJSTRULTION. RAMP TO BE PROVIDED FOR ~a' ~ ( R2.0' ~` B ~ / ! i i %~ i1
ACCE55iBILITY. ~~~{~ ! TYP. ~, ~ ~' .. 2j 1~ lJ ~' } ~ ~ ~ ~~
` (2) HORSESHOE PI75 ?I 6•a ~ / / ~~ r •. &Q rl /~ ~ 1" ~ i
Q ~ or f SEE DETAILS SNT. L-7(9 ~~ ~ ~ rf "j ~ // ~ I ~ 1111,
~ PROPOSED TRASH ' r .I ~a i~, / ! ~ 2 ~' 1 { ! ~ , i fl '
'7f ~I RECEPTACLE R5.0' I ~* 60,. 20 ~ I! ~ / rr hCQN 4Q ,P RSCW PAVILI 7 ` ~I,! ~ ~ ~ j S i I,
' +f \ >; ~ / STRU~TED ICON 5 ND 5 I r r ~r ± ~
bq~ ~. II ~0r PROPOSED TRASH ~.8 ! / / ,,AD ¢,PR•''LIFICATI ~ CONT } 1 I ~ r
la'zla' PRE-ENGINEEREp RECEPTACLE •~ / r ., 1 ~+~~ f! I ! j ~ ~ !~
-~1iAI,L SUBMIT INGS Pp~OR I r SSSfff
CHANGING BUILDING - '../~ ~ / .~~ T' ~ / ~ ~ ? ~ I`
t ~~TO INNIN',, 5 UCTION ~ rI' f
KIOSK STRUCTURE TO BE BI11LT ~ NO RESTRCb11S PROVIpEP _ `~EE'AETAILS T -701 t L-70~ " '! J' (t ~ i I '
TO MATCH KIOSK A7 THE ROANGKE SEE DETAILS L-701 / jr, ^ ~' (; 1 I i ~. J
RAPIDS DAY USE AREA. Pi.AAOUE @' ~ % ,'' .; '~.:! / ~ ~ i t'' ~ S I f I~
DESIGN < INFORMATION TO 8E n 19 • ~ ~ ;,.. , ~ rh ; l~„ ' ' ! ~,~
APPROVED BY DOMINION PRIOR TO ~ 1' a ~~ AIht:IB;~jq' ' ' • . .~., I/~ 1r~f ~ ~ i ~ ~ r»„
ORDERING. IQ 9 '~'~ d'` 1~k 33 STA+x0+50 ~fl ` ~; % ~ , .' •./ ' ` ~ 9 1 ~ INT ~ ',;
4 I •! / '
~ m ,. ~ (j~,~ I
LAKE GA~~ON Op ~ ~ ,,y' ~' 6 DIMr7.50' ' ~~.~~ n"`per, ,~;/ r 1 ~~ a~ ~ r~ (' I f~{~ 1
\ A ~ ~ STA~20+16.55 F .J ' \ '~ ~ I(~
/ ~ H-CAP PARKI I ~ ~ !
~ 6 ~ A CONCRETE IN ` /,,~ ~ ~ ri~ '~ 1 1 j ~ f ~~~ 1/
~ ed ~ ~ ~~ I /~ ~ ~ ~~~ ri rr~/~pp~ ~ 1 !~~ l ,l~~
I~ p r 1
{9) RED SUNSET RED MAPL \ ~ ! tl ,\ <,;! I } z 1 i f I,
Ater Rubrun 'Red srmmeL' _ > ^2'~ ~~, r'p / 1 , ` I ~ {ij ~//' S '~ f I ~ I
MIN, 2.5" CALIPER ~ \ i r ~~ ^ ~ < / ~ ," ~ t' 1. 444 } J I j ~7 I 210. '
~ ~ s ~y ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~%~~ ~ ~~ ' ~~
/ i ; r. ~+
o )I
.~ ~ ~ 1 N 7 i I SF' i'~ ~ l Y• I~ f i 1
Ir
'_`__ c ~ ~~1i1' ~
~~'~N `C
sGa"1..~. l ,'~ ~

Q ~ ~ ~ C ` G
~ro. - 796 ~ ~ 1 ' /J
_ __ -__ ___ ~q0
'79? ~ - - - -- -------------- as h~;~
~yEPIMENT TRAP ""•/
-- / 7~ ~ 7 r l •!~
~ ~ .. ! 4;
x ~ ~I
a;
-, I 2
1 q6- of gten ,% /f
- ®z:
-' fQ2 •. ~ ~ ~ / 403 / /~
~~ ~~ •~ •2 2 .66~ ~ ~ ~ ~/ EDIMENT TRAP
~ r '~ , ( r j
~ , ~\ ~,\ t2Q 78 I DA= 1.46r~.
4G'l,G?0~ ~ I ~ ry~
¢ ~ ~' t `D J ~ 202.V1 ~ .
9~~, ~, §5i~'~I.ASS'~U RIP-Rt~P ~I ` ~ .D2 ` ~ t2 SEPIM T TRAP I
O ,~ ;ttfN ~11,DEPTN ~WITW WDVEN II '~ DA= 0. Ac. I
@~~ ~. ~~ FJL~ER PADRIC $ETWEfik ~ lq 11 i '' ~1 1
. ~ ` ~'RfP,-P.A'P pND $OA. 1. l
/mod ,~~'.FtxINDA'ft10~•1 I 11 II ,
FAKE ~~~~~~~', ~~ F ~ I'P\` 1
1 ` t 1 ~ ~ `~
't~, `~ :~~`SEPIMETFT TRAP-l ° \ ~ t \ `r20ra8 \
°~ ~\~~~ \ f\ ~ .97 t2
,~1 ~ •. ', ' ~ i
z~
I
i
smcxP!LE
``XX// _ ~~~~_~--_
f yh~
rI07,24
~. ~ ~- y' - "~^"'r--
cJ~

/per
~\
~;~~
~, y I •~~
l M /,
lar6~a ~ . ~•.. ~ Y /
~~ y%
9//~/
i %/
I2u.
~ ,.:i
i,
7 ~ •1
'. + % /
' ./
~:iD+[ j
~~~.,•
~, ~ ~ ~ I ~ DA• 0.18 Ac. ~ 1./
7 t r ~ ~~ j ~~~ ~ ~
EROSION CONTROL LEGEND r-.
"~ / \ I
T Jy
7
~~ f
--- ~ r t2
+tzl02s ~-~~...~
~~'
I~ ,
i ~~
rT +1';t

s ~~ ~ /
,,- / ~~
t.~ fal ~ f
i
STaK P LE FR E G
MA7ERIA~ AND D
D.95 ~ ~ I MATERIAV. ~
11 V / ~ ;r~
X21 ' / ~ i r ~ ,~
I.
l 1
1
11 II 1
i
! 1~1
~'
ww~~~~

, . GNITS OF GRADING

V
E~A210N SPECIFlCATION ~
CONSTRDCTION ENTRANCE TEMPORARY
SEDIMENT
TRAP
o
L M -
pAe CONf(tIBUT1NC DRAINAGE AREA
FOR EROSION CONTROL DEVICES
SEDIMENT FENCE WITH
E[--~-it~ SEDIMENF FENCE ~ STABILIZED OUFLET ~~~ yTONE CHECK DAM

~o
~ ° ~~ ! ! ~ r !I t
so.` ~, ~ ~ i ~ 1
/f
~°' I''~ r ~+ ~ /~• ~`/ ( ~ , 211.05 ~~ ~ ~~ a
~ r
~/ '~ r 1' , , ', ,! j ~ 1 1 '
!~ ` i, 1 i; ! I f
lI ~ 1 r
~'~ r
~ '
J ~~'1 /'r( 11 f r ~ ~ ~ I ~ ' r ~ Ir~~~l -
~ ~' ! ! lr i' ~ ~'~ ~ I J ~ r'J_~~I
rYn r
.f
~>i'~~~f II ~~! I ~ li i , j ' r
,lr~i~~~r ~ r . ~ i r;~J<i~.
r i~ lS ~ ;!
~~' l~ 7 1
1~S-r~~t sue{ ~s~
GRA55 LMED /~~~~ t r+
CHANNEL ~~„~!'!+~ Vz/^~'"'~~ ~~
GL ~~~~+ Irk ~ ~ pr ~b4
---TD-PTO-- TEMPORARY DNERSION

~~._
% ,,y53
"' 9
_ ~ ,.._ ~
,.
~~,~_ sa
"'~ ~ ,,.
`"` ~ 1~
,,y~ ~ f J~ /
\a~ j \ mw~_,,,
7t ~ \ ~
,~ - ie5 a~
/ i ~ P
r .; r
~,r ~~
~ ]
'qi I ~ 292.2
.~ •.,
. /
s~, ~03i "' ~`ti ~ ~ ~~ Nov. 2d C•1
~'~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ 1
•> > 1 r
" ~ te~ 1
'', ~ \ ~ ~,' 1 P,~~ i
~~ n ` ~
''91 1
~ `t. \
.'
20070222
~~n~ ra~~ ~s~
1~~'ti-~ir~ !. ~~ r~5
~o-~: I",~~n,
.~
4;
h
20X.8
x, EN.
20'
20X.4
~ ~~
a,
~'~
X
/ ; 20X.4
a•~ a ~
1.11 sf
LAND~A
:163.97 sf
:0,004 cre
20X.4
DENSE S
SfOCNPIIE
20X.b ~
20X.8
20X.0
20X.4 ~

i
\`/)
i 209.8
x 21X.0 ~
~ I
~g i '~Jp
~`\ t
X~~ ti ~ X ~
21X 5 ~ i ~. ~ ~ L
,~ 1
,~ I
;~ ~ ~ ,,
f
j ~
~`~ ~/ i
1 2fX.5 ,
( ~
` ~ i~ ~ ,t;, ~ 212.4 ~
t ~ I ' X
1 r' ry .~ (( ~ ~ S
\ ~?j ~ ~~ ff
s ~~ ~ ~ 1 i ;
^'y { f f L~ 1 ~f
,. s''''.. a. i 1 211.2
~:~ft t~~H.i. 1
.~~' r/ !
.:.
21X.2 •' " 1C
.~ ` X
•~i:'~' ' t 21X0.2
,f ~ ~
21X.3 ~~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~
r~ 1
i,, ' ~~~'J ~ 21>~'8 ~ f
21X.4
21X5.5

Photos of the Day Use Swimming Area

20070222

t ~ W} ~ ~( Y

1
.~
r I'
{
I
1`,'
~,
f~ ~'
4 .
A77225
®~
i.
(t

Wetland Delineation Report

MACTEC
engineering and constructing a better tomorrow
August 7, 2006
Mr. Robert Williams
Dominion Resources Services, Inc.
5000 Dominion Blvd.
TTP 18
Glen Allen, VA 23060

RE: Roanoke Rapids Day Use Wetland Delineation
Roanoke Rapids Lake and Lake Gaston, North Carolina and Virginia
MACTEC Project No. 6470-06-1484
Dear Mr. Williams:
Thank you for contacting Mactec Engineering and Consulting, Inc., (MACTEC) concerning the
above referenced project. It is our understanding that you requested a jurisdictional wetland and
stream delineation adjacent to the Roanoke Rapids Lake and Lake Gaston located in Halifax,
Northampton, and Warren Counties, North Carolina and Mecklenburg County, Virginia. The
seven project sites (2 sites at Roanoke Rapids Lake and 5 sites at Lake Gaston) are adjacent to
the shorelines of the restive lakes. Figure 1 provides a general location of the seven proposed
project areas. This letter outlines our findings pertaining to the jurisdictional delineation.
Prior to the initiation of field efforts, available sources were reviewed, including U.S. Geological
Survey (LJSGS) 7.5-minute topographic quadrangles, National Wetland Inventory (NWI),
quadrangles, and Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) soils mapping for Halifax,
Northampton, and Warren Counties, North Carolina and Mecklenburg County, Virginia.
Wetlands
Jurisdictional wetlands are defined by 33 CFR 328.3(b) and are protected by Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), which is administered and enforced by the US Army Corps
of Engineers (USAGE). For this investigation, wetlands are those areas which satisfy the
technical criteria in the 1987 USAGE Wetlands Delineation Manual (Technical Report Y-87-1).
The field investigation included an inspection of the entire easement boundary to identify areas
which. exhibited wetland characteristics. Jurisdictional wetlands are defined in the field as areas
that have positive evidence of three environmental parameters:
• Hydrophytic vegetation (vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions);
• Wetland hydrology (substrate that is inundated or saturated to the surface at some time
during the growing season); and
• '> Hydric soils (soils that possess characteristics that are associated with reducing/anaerobic soil
conditions).
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. .
3301 Atlantic Avenue • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone: [phone] • fax: [phone] vvww.mactec.com

Roanoke Rapids Day Use Wetland Delineation August ~ 2006
Roanoke Rapids Lake and Lake Calton
MACTEC Project no. 647'0-06-14$4
Seven areas (Areas 1, 2, 4, S, 6, 7, and 8} were surveyed for jurisdictional wetlands. The
landward limits of wetland jurisdiction within the project areas were determined using the
Routine On-Site Determination (RD) method as defined in the USACE Wetlands Delineation
Manual. Observations on vegetation, soils, and hydrology were recorded on the field data forms.
The wetland boundaries were marked in the field with red color and blue color flagging tape.
Flag points were sequentially labeled with the wetland unit designation and flag location number.
Flag locations were registered using a handheld Global Positioning System (GPS) unit. All
registered GPS data were differentially-corrected to sub-meter accuracy. A jurisdictional
wetland polygon was generated from the corrected GPS data and wetland acreage was
determined using an automated Geographic Information System (GIS) feature.
Wetland areas were evaluated using the three-parameter approach outlined by the USACE 1987
Wetlands Delineation Manual, which requires the presence of hydric soils, hydrophytic
vegetation, and evidence of wetland hydrology.
The field investigation was conducted on 24 July 2006. Three jurisdictional wetland areas were
delineated within the seven project areas: Area 1 (0.15 acres), Area 2 (< 0.02 acres), and Area 8
(< 0.01). The boundaries of the wetlands, as mapped through GPS technology, are depicted on
Figures 2A, 2B, and 2C.
Wetlands within Areas 1 and 8 are characterized as forested riparian wetlands. Based on
Cowardin et. al (1979) these wetlands would be classified as PF01C (palustrine, forested, broad-
leaved deciduous, seasonally flooded). Vegetation within wetlands at Area 1 and 8 generally
consisted of red maple (Acel° f•ubrum), tulip-tree (Liriodendron tulipifera}, cinnamon fern
(Osmunda cinnamomea), arrow arum (Peltandra vit ginica), tag alder (Alnus serrulatu), and
Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides}. Data on vegetation, soils, and hydrology of the
wetland areas were recorded on the RD field forms (see Attachments).
Wetlands within Area 2 are characterized as emergent marsh. Based on Cowardin et. al (1979)
these wetlands would be classified as L2EM (iacustrine, littoral, emergent). Vegetation within
wetlands at Area consists primarily of spike-rush (Eleocharis obtuse}. Data on vegetation, soils,
and hydrology of the wetland areas were recorded on the RD field forms (see Attachments).
Streanr-s
MACTEC scientists conducted a field xeconnaissance of the easement area to determine the
presence or absence of perennial stream channels. The methods for determination of stream
classification were in accordance with the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ) stream evaluation
protocols in Identification Methods for the Origins of Intermittent and Perennial Streams (Version
3.1}, dated February 28, 2005. The stream channel assessment included a qualitative review of
channel characteristics (i.e., biological, hydrological, and geomozphological components) for the
puzpose of documenting ephemeral (non jurisdictional} versus intermittent or perennial channels.
No perennial or intermittent stream channels were identified within the project study area.
2

Roanoke Rapids Day Use Wetland Delineation
Roanoke Rapids Lake and Lake Gaston
MACTEC Project no. 6470-06-1484
August 7, 2006
SnmmarV'
MACTEC identified and delineated three wetlands at three different sites. The three delineated
wetland sites ranged in size from < 0.01 acres to 0.15 acres. No perennial or intermittent stream
channels were identified within the project site. Wetland impacts exceeding 0.10-acre will
require a permit from the USACE.
MACTEC appreciates this chance to provide Dominion Resource Services, Inc. our services and
look forward to working with you in the future. Please contact Mr. Richard Harmon at (919)
$31-8003 should you have any questions regarding this report.
Sincerely,
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, INC.
~°'t"1
~~
Lauren Saal
Staff Scientist
~~~.
Richard G. Harmon
Principal Natural Resource Scientist
Attachment: Location Map
Delineation Map
RM Forms

2ao70~2~
Scale: Not To Scale
Source: DeLorme (Street Atlas USA, version 7
Wetland Delineations ~ DOMINION ,,f//
Roanoke Rapidsli,ake Gaston RsexvlCFS~ G%/ E
T
MA
North Carolina & Virginia
Prepared !Date:
Checked I Date
Project Vicinity Map
6470-06-1484

LEGEND
Roads
•,• Wetlands (GPS)
Wetland Area = < 0.02 acres
50 0 50 100 Feet
Scale: 1" =125'
CIR
Prepared /Date:
DOMINION Jurisdictional Waters
Wetland Delineation RESOi1RCF.S~+ MACTEC 1998 Color Infrared Photography
Area 2: Lake Gaston Day Use SERVICES r~
Halifax County, North Carolina
~'~~ Project: 6470-06-1484 Figure 2B

i
~v~~1 ~F~ {_ ~~ ~~ n Y Pk `T ~~ +r
~ .~ ast i ~ }~. }s i [d ~ - ~~ MJ
v,' `~ i~ y ,` r sr-
~ 1~ ;a. F
~° ~, ~'~,
.E ~s~ ~ ~ < . y ~ • 615 :~ r
~~: ° ~~-
'-
'}~~'~i,~ ~~ s, ~~L ~ _,' ~, ,ate. A~~• ~.
., +,. _
<;
s ~.
r`'~ ~ ~ Mr ~.' ,fie ~. Y any #a
*~ ]~ 9~ .~,
¢~ r? '
~ ~ 'v'ia `yK ~~~ j~y ~~'~,` ~a ~s4k ~~', $~- ~ 3 y~ ~ ~t ~~~
i fir, y ` ~ ~ '! - ~
rk ,~ ,a•r ~_ t., wy~,~i.`. a ~~ i ~ ~
~ ~
LEGEND °'~
i
,~`
%~
~~ {" ,
Wetland = < 0.01 acres ,`~ ~` ,v ~ : `~, ~¢ K ~` ~° '~
50 0 50 100 Feet t +~~~ f~y~,~~r. s~~°°y ~ r 4
Scale: 1" = 125' Prepared / Datc:
Source: Radford Universi , USGS (1994 CIIt Aerial Checked /Date:
Prepared For: Prepared By:
Wetland Delineation DOMINION Jurisdictional Waters
Area 8: Bank Fishing At Miles Creek RrsouRCis ~ 1998 Color Infrared Photography
Mecklenburg County, Virginia SERVICES ~(MACTEC
~°"~"`"' Project: 6470-06-1484 Figure 2C

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE We#lands Determination Manual)
Project J Site: ~ •-~c; Date: %Z `~ c
Applicant! Owner: ` • ~,' c: F ~1 yc C.
Investigator: `' ~ ~ ~ County: f ~'
State: /V C

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: Gt,a
Is the site significantly disturbed {Atypical situation)? Yes No_~
Is the area a potential problem area? ves No~_ Transect ID:
Plot ID:
{explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator

3. u ~,r _ 11.
~~
S• QSYR.~a.l~ n: c.: u. to r 2• ~ C 'I ~' 13.
6. 1A.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, ar FAC excluding FAC-). ~-I~
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
,_,_, Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): We#land Hydrology fndicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary tndicators:
____ Other T~undated
,/Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available ...~._.• Water Marks
_ _ brift Lines
Field Observations: ~.,. Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
~
Depth of Surface Water: ~
.(in.)
Secondary Indicators:
"
//
Depth to Free Water in Pit: / ,n
~ ) Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12
r
_
- ..~ Water-Stained Leaves
/~ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: SU E' kC(-~in.) ~ FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
~~~74222
solLs

Map Unit Name . (
(Series and Phase): 1 ~..,~ ~
~~~ ~ ~, 1 ~ C. Ic,~tiin1-~ Drainage Class:
,
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Golors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Hori
z
on (Munsell Moistl (Munsell Moistl AbundancelContrast Structure etc.
/
~
~= !-~- ti
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosoi _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon ~ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor
~ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
~. Reducing Conditions Listed on National Wydric Soils List
_ Gleyed ar Low-Chrome Colors Other {Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERM(NATiON
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ~C No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ~! No Within a Wetland? Yes No~
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ~ No
Remarks:

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 2 ~
.('1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manuai~
~ `
Project I Site: ` ~ .~ ne~~ ~i~ Or ~is~ ~ ~i ~ F!~r~ j
~
Dater t 246.13
Applicant /Owner: ~~ County:
investiga#or: State:

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes, No Community ID:~
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No~..,._ Transact ID:
is the area a potential problem area? Yes Wo ~ Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
lant Species
Dom
nant Stratum l
n
di
c
at
or Dominant Plant Species Stratum indicator
P
i
I j
"
~
~
~
2. ~ ~ 7yP~ ri°~C 10.
3. G- ~' .~C' C ~ 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). /~
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
___.__ Recorded Data {Describe In Remarks): Wetland Wydrology Indicators
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
,_,_ Aerial Photographs Primary indicators:
Other
~' inundated
Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: ,Sediment Deposits
• _• Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of SurFace Water: ~_(in.) Secondary indicators:
n Oxidized Roats Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: /~ (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
~

~ _ Loaal Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soii: ~(in.) ~.. FAGl~eutraE Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: ~~ ~ 1'• j YLGC,~ ~~~ C9~j ~' eCCSGc~d Yt'~ } uL~i~'c ~pr S
SOILS

Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No_
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
i
nc
he
Hor
S
i
zon IMunselE Moist) (Munseil Moistl, AbundanceJContrast Structure. etc.
y
~
,
~
-
J
,~
5L_1~.. / J / U ~~
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosat _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon _
~ ____ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Suifidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Saiis
____ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
W____ Gfeyed or Low-Chroma Colors __ ___ Other (Explain ir- Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERM1NATiON
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ~ Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ~ Within a Wetland? Yes No~
Wydric Soils Present? Yes No
Remarks:

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION ~ ~~ ~' 7 0 2 2 2
.(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual}
Project !Site: yl. C' S c ~~ ' E' ~. Date: ~ Zv U~
Applicant! Owner: ~ ~ {~ '. Y r E County: Q,
Investigator: ~ ~_ u • State: /V (~

Da normal circumstances exist on the site? ves.~_ No Community ID:~
is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation}? vas ~ No~C^ Transact ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? vas Na~_ plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Saecies Stratum Indicator
Dominant Plant bominant Plant 3oecies Stratum Indicator
JJ
1.~~L'[~ cGc G~.--~~ 9.
2. 'l~~i ~G~.h' -f' ~~~ •...~~ 10.
3. 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-j. 1_~}~.j ,~,
Remarks: C
Zc,, {?.~!!~ ~c~ G~rP_ c, ~' ~ Ltt ~I~S-~ C7-t'` 0~2./ •S~ r K f' s°uv~'Li
HYDROLOGY
____W. Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
•~„~ Other ~ Inundated
-Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available ____ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: ._._ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surtace Water: •~' (-n.) Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: ~/~ (in.) ~ Wa#er-Stained Leaves

~ _ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: /U
(in.) FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS

Map Unit Name
(series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Taxonomy 4Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No~
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon fM
u
nsell Moisti ( Munsell Moisti AbundancelContrast Structure, etc.
rr
''
~_ ~ LV
Hydric Soit indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon
~ -High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odar Organic Streaking in Sandy Soifs
~ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soifs List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ___._ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ~C No is the Sampling Point
Wettand Hydrology Present? Yes ~ No Within a Wetland? Yes No_
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ~, No
Remarks:

DATA FORM ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
{'19$7 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site:•'i"\ 1n.crfi-,P ~ . ` ~ t•~~ U>-5',~ f-/ ~°~ ~ Date: ,~ .J~. ~~G
Applicant 1 Owner: ,) c: YGP County: _ ~, - ~.
Investigator: i State: ,~ C

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: ~ f
fs the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No Transact ID:
is the area a potential problem area? Yes No Piot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. 9.
2. 1 D.
3. 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
~
8. 16. ~
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding i=AC-).
Remarks: ~,) a ~ ~~, ~ ~ ~ / 0'+ti ; (.~.~ l~ t~~ Q-1"~' 4. -' ~. V CA U ~. r ~ 4~Y~(,a~.y l c'
HYDROLOGY
_.._. Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Wydroiogy Indicators
,_.~• Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other _ inundated
-Saturated in Upper 12"
No Retarded Data Available .~ water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surtace Water: ~~(in.) Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Deptit to Free Water in Pit: ~~in.) Water-Stained Leaves

Depth to Saturated Soil: ~r~ (in.) _ Local Soil Survey Data
____ FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks
Remarks:
SOILS

Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Taxanamy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes, No~
Profile Description:
pepth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(i
nc
hes
) Horizon IMunsell Moistl _ (Munsell Moistl AbundancelContrast Structure etc.
~~
__
~~
~._....L.G_,_ ._,~.____~
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ H'sstic Epipedon ~ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Sails List
____ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Cofors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: ~'~
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Nydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ~ Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ~ Within a Wetland? Yes No~
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Remarks:

ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION ~ ~~ ~~ `~ ~ ~~ ~ 2
.(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project ! Site: ~r~ ' i!o l~ : ~ ~ ~ (~~~ ~' Date: 2 2,(7 ~
Applicant I Owner:. `u u_ + A,~ ~ ~S ~
Investigator: ~c Q~t-"Y11.821 County ~r~
State: ~

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes No
is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation}? Yes Nom
!s the area a potential problem area? Yes No~
{explain on reverse if needed} Community tDI~~..~
7ransect 1D:
Pfot ID:
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Ind
icator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. G m ~ ~i
~/tC 9.

4.~`~r;7i {t G.9 C!lY~,,Q,~iwiau•~ L~y~ ~T 12.
5. ~ 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent a# Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-}. / ~ () ~a
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks}: Wefland Hydroiogy Indicators
.~ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
____. Other _ Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12"
_ No Recorded Data Available _____ water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: ~ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth a# Surtace Water: ..~~(in.) Secondary indicators:

Depth to Free Water in Pit: ~ (in
) Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
. _Water-Stained Leaves
_ Locai Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: _~~ _(in.} _FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS

Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes~„~,„ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
)i
nc
hes
)
Horizon {Munsell
M
oi
st
l fMunsell Moistl AbundancelConfrast Structure, etc.
nn
~~
~~
,~„
(~~'
~
~j
~
J
Hydric 5oii Indicators: ''
_ Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon
~ ____ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _____Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
__~__ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Solis List
____ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ____ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ~. No is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ~ No Within a Wetland? Yes No,,,~
Hydric Solis Present? Yes ~'7ZC No
Remarks:

~ !t
DATA FORM `• ~ ` '~~ _' ~
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
.(1987' COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project t Site:l-~~ ~ =~a SN ea, Date: ~= ~ ~.1 ~C!(1(~
AppiicantlOwner: ~ ~? 7~y,C. County:
Investigator: ~~ It~a State:

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID:~~p
fs the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No Transact 1D:
is the area a potential problem area? Yes No Plot 1D:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum indicator Dominant Plant Species __ _ _ __ Stratum Indicator
~--,

g,T r ~ ~ _ 11.
4~. +G~ ~-s d~dra~ t'- s
_____ V ruc ~ #~e~~ ~ P ,~
. 12.
S.
~ ~ 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
g, 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or i=AC excluding FAC-). ,~_Q~._.._.
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, ar Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other _ Inundated
_ Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available ~. water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
~
Depth of Surtace Water: _~e`V L~(in.) Secondary indicators:
~ Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
De th to Free Water in Pit:
in.
p ~ 1 Water-Stained Leaves
~

~2 _ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: ,
cin.) FAC-Neutral lest
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
{U c.} ~~~yu~/`~ yr 5~c~a,, ~y~,~ t~ ~~ ~~5
SOILS

Map Uni# Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage C{ass:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No~
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon Munsell Moist (Munsell Moistl AbundancelContrast Structure, etc.
c~,~ ~ a .~
Wydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosoi _ Concretions
_ Wisfic Epipedon ~ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Suifidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
,____ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Go{ors ____ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Wydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes
Wetland Wydrology Present? Yes
Wydric Soils Present? Yes
No ~ is the Sampling Point
No ~ Within a Wetland? Yes, Nom'
No .x
Remarks: