20060795 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20060510

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
June 2, 2006
DWQ# 06-0795
Guilford County
Mr. Phil Wilson
Echo Properties, Inc.
707 Simpson Street
Greensboro, NC 27401
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Wilson:
Echo Properties, Inc. has our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to place permanent fill in
120 linear feet of perennial stream and in 370 linear feet of intermittent stream in order to construct two road
crossings for the Joseph's Claim residential subdivision located on Highway NC 61 in Gibsonville, Guilford
County, as described in your application received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on May 10, 2006.
After reviewing your application, we have determined that this fill is covered by General Water Quality
Certification Number 3402, which can be viewed on our web site at
http://www.ncwaterquality.org/wetlands.html. This Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit
Number 39 when it is issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. In addition, you should secure any other
applicable federal, state or local permits before you proceed with your project, including (but not limited to)
those required by Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
Also, this approval will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the
General Certification.
This approval is valid only for the purpose and design that you have described in your application. If you
change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be required to send us a new application for a
new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and
approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fill for this
project (now or in the future) exceeds one acre, or total fill to perennial streams equals or exceeds 150 linear
feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval
to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification, as well as the additional
conditions listed below:
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all other specific and general conditions of this
Certification are met. No other impacts, including incidental impacts, are approved:
Amount Approved Plan Location or Reference
Streams 490 linear feet Two unnamed tributaries to Travis Creek located west of NC 61 in
Gibsonville, Guilford County, as depicted on the site plan included
with the application

NN.._ Carolina
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Certification Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 Phone [phone] FAX [phone]
2321 Crabtree Blvd. Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 Internet hfp:/hvww.ncwaterguality.org
Customer Service Number: 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
1Ir. Phil Filson
Paae 2, D«Q= 06-0795
June 2, 2006
2. Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures which equal or exceed those outlined in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual or the
forth Carolina Surface Mining Manual (available from the Division of Land Resources at NCDENR
regional offices or the central office), whichever is more appropriate, shall be designed, installed and
maintained properly to assure compliance at all times with the North Carolina water quality standards
that are applicable to Class C waters as described in ISA NCAC 02B.0211 Fresh Surface Water Quality
Standards For Class C Waters. Such measures must equal or exceed the requirements specified in the
most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. These measures must
be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) sites, including contractor
owned and leased borrow pits, which are associated with this project.
3. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent
practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control measures in wetlands or waters is
unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that the
project is completed or, if applicable, within six months of the date that the project is released by the
North Carolina Division of Land Resources.
4. No waste, spoils, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the
footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction activities,
including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control "Best
management Practices" shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards,
statutes, or rules occur.
5. The culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream profile
is not altered (i.e. the depth of the channel must not be reduced by a widening of the streambed).
Existing stream dimensions (including the pattern and profile) are to be maintained above and below the
location of each culvert. The culverts shall be designed and installed to prevent head cutting of the
stream. If a culvert becomes perched, the appropriate stream grade shall be re-established or, if a culvert
is installed in a perched manner, it shall be removed and re-installed correctly. The Applicant must
submit a plan and receive written approval from this Office to address any head cutting that will occur as
a result of this project (e.g., use of cross vanes downstream of the culvert).
6. Where riprap is required for energy dissipation and scour protection, it shall be limited to the minimum
dimensions specified by appropriate engineering calculations. Riprap may only be used below the
normal high water level. The original grade and elevation of the stream's cross-section must be
maintained. Riprap placed in the stream bottom must be inserted into the bottom matrix to a depth
sufficient to provide the thickness of riprap required for scour protection. The elevation of the stream
bottom must not be increased by the placement of riprap. Placement of riprap must not result in
destabilization of the streambed or banks upstream or downstream of any crossing.
7. All construction activities associated with this project shall minimize built-upon surface area, direct
stormwater runoff away from surface waters, and incorporate best management practices to minimize
water quality impacts. If concrete is used with any fill material, it shall not be allowed to come in
contact with surface waters until it has cured. If any stormwater must be collected for discharge into a
stream channel, it shall not enter the stream as a point source, but shall be slowed and discharged as
sheet flow prior to entering the riparian buffer on either side of the stream.
Mr. Phil Wilson
Page 3, DWQ# 06-0795
June 2, 2006
Upon finishing the project, the Applicant shall fill out and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the §401 Certification has been completed.
This certificate should be returned to the Wetlands/401 Certification Unit of the NC Division of Water
Quality at the address listed on the form. Along with the Certificate of Completion, please send
photographs upstream and downstream of the culvert site to document correct installation.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You
must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition
which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General . Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final
and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
If you have any questions, please telephone Daryl Lamb in the DWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office at 336-
771-4959 or Ian McMillan in the Wetlands/401 Central Office in Raleigh at 919-715-4631.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AWK/cdl
Attachments
cc: Mr. Todd Tugwell, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Central Files
Wetlands/401 File Copy
Ms. Denise Poulos, ECS Carolinas, LLP, 4811 Koger Boulevard, Greensboro, NC 27407

Triage Check List
Date: 5/15/06
Project Name: Joseph's Claim
DWQ#: 06-0795
County: Guilford
To:
Daryl Lamb, Winston-Salem Regional Office
60-day processing time: 5/10/06 - 7/08/06
From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone: [phone]
The file attached is being forwarded to you for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks!
9ELLUD
CAn®1_iNAS
ECS CAROLINAS, LLP
Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental
2 fv U0 7 9 5
May 9, 2006
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Suite 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-2260 .
Reference: Request for 401 Water Quality Certification
Joseph's Claim
Guilford County, Gibsonville, North Carolina
ECS Project G-12103A
Dear Ms. Karoly:
?T7,
1
fu L- L t•
Enclosed please find seven copies of the Preconstruction Notification for activities associated with the site
located in Gibsonville, North Carolina. The site is an approximate 62 acre tract located on the west side of
Highway 61 in Gibsonville (Figure 1). The site is being evaluated for residential development with
Joseph's Claim.
ECS Carolinas, LLP delineated the jurisdictional waters on the site in February 2006. Mr. Todd Tugwell
with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers verified the delineation on March 1, 2006. As shown on the
exhibits prepared by CPT Engineering and Surveying, Inc, there are approximately 1,855 linear feet of
tributaries to Travis Creek and less than one tenth of an acre of wetlands on the site. Approximately 370
linear feet of stream have been designated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to be "unimportant and
immitigable". This reach of stream is intermittent in our opinion. In order to construct a road and create
building lots, this stream will be filled. A perennial, important stream is located near the eastern
boundary of the site. In order to access the site, a road will be constructed that will cross this stream.
Approximately 70 feet of 36 inch RCP and 50 feet of rip-rap will be placed in the stream at the road
crossing. This will result in an impact to 120 linear feet of stream channel. NCDOT headwalls and 2:1
side slopes will be used to minimize the impact to the stream at this location. There are no other impacts
planned for this project.
This permit application, prepared on behalf of Echo Properties, LLC, requests a 401 Water Quality
Certification to authorize the above described stream impacts. These impacts are further described in the
permit application. Due to the minimal impact (120 linear feet of important, perennial stream channel),
mitigation should not be required and none is proposed. This application has also been sent to the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers for their approval.
I 1 i.."a
MAY 1 0 2006
i.EnK -'Y`t,?l ?4 rl? r i
4811 Koger Boulevard • Greensboro, NC 27407 • [phone] • Fax [phone]
MAY-04-06 09:06 AM
ECS Carolinas, LLP
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Scope of Work: Wetland Permitting Services
Location: Approximate 62 Acre Tract
Church Street
Oibsonville.North Carolina
This form authorizes ECS Carolinas. LLP to act as our agent in stream/wetland matters including U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Quality field verification and permit
application.
Property Address:

Owner Information:
Name:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Fax Number.
E-mail Address:
P-02
C) f N 1 ?rf? ??? S
C?? ?sa.?, ((4 . l?l C ?z 9
?'O .?psb S-f-,
62'.r ee ^Ss C-> c0 NC 2-1 Lf0!
-n 2N_rg4/-
r-
2

Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 2 0 Q 6 0 7 9 5
(It any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing ?, • F R
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: 1H t__C `,; i_# }
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of C a Wnagement Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details) r!
II Applicant Information MAY 2006
1. Owner/Applicant Information P, DENR ?',6S?_,ns WAT-
re 11,QUA,1 i7-
Name: Echo Properties, Inc.
Mailing Address: 707 Simpson Street
Greensboro North Carolina 27401
Attn: Mr. Phil Wilson
Telephone Number: 336-451-5263 Fax Number: 336-299-8031
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Denise M. Poulos
Company Affiliation: ECS Carolinas, LLP
Mailing Address: 4811 Koger Boulevard
Greensboro North Carolina 27407
Telephone Number: 336-856-7150 Fax Number: 336-856-7160
E-mail Address: dpoulos&ecslimited.com
Page 5 of 13
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Joseph's Claim
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Guilford County Nearest Town: Gibsonville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Joseph's Claim
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Gibsonville: Drive
north on Highway 61. The site is on the west side of Highway 61. See Figure 1 for the site
location.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 036°06'50.16" N 079° 32' 57.34" W
6. Property size (acres): Approximately 62 Acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT to Travis Creek
8. River Basin: Haw/Cape Fear
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/mgp-I 21-11
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site contains agricultural structures, wooded land and
fields. The surrounding properties contain residences, commercial businesses, wooded land
and fields.
Page 6 of 13
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The site
will be developed with a single family residential cluster development. Trucks, pans,
loaders, trackhoes, etc. will be used to develop the site.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the work is to develop a
residential subdivision on the site. Two tributaries to Travis Creek are present on the site.
Approximately 120 linear feet of the tributary near the eastern site boundary will be impacted
by the construction of a road. This tributary has been designated by Mr. Todd Tugwell as an
important, mitigable stream. Approximately 370 linear feet of the tributary nearer the center
of the site will be impacted by road construction and lot fill. This tributary has been
designated by Mr. Todd Tugwell as an unimportant, non mitigable stream.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. ECS delineated the jurisdictional waters on the site in February 2006.
Mr. Todd Tugwell with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers verified the wetland/stream
delineation at the site on March 1, 2006. There have been no previous permits requested or
obtained for this project.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
We do not anticipate that there will be future permit requests for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Page 7 of 13
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Two tributaries to Travis Creek
are present on the site. Approximately 120 linear feet of the tributary near the eastern site
boundary will be impacted by the construction of a road. This tributary has been designated
by Mr. Todd Tugwell as an important, mitigable stream. Approximately 370 linear feet of
the tributary nearer the center of the site will be impacted by road construction and lot fill.
This tributary has been designated by Mr. Todd Tugwell as an unimportant, non mitigable
stream.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding. There are no wetland impacts
associated with the project.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: < 1/10 acre
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial Intermittent?
? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
#1 UT to Travis Creek Pip-rip rap Perennial 5 feet 1201f 0.013
#2 UT to Travis Creek fill Intermittent 4 feet 3701f 0.034

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 4901f 0.047
Page 8 of 13
Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc. There are no open water
impacts associated with this project.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact . Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.047
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.000
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.000
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.047
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 490
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation There are no ponds planned for the site.
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
Page 9of13
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The impact to the eastern
stream is unavoidable. In order to access the site, that stream must be crossed. The impact in that
area has been minimized with the use of 2:1 side slopes and NCDOT headwalls. The impact at
the second stream is necessary to build a road and to create building lots. This is an intermittent,
low quality stream with no habitat value. There are approximately 1,855 linear feet of stream
channel on the project site. Only 120 linear feet of perennial, "important" stream will be
impacted by the development.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
hllp://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The impact to the mitigable stream has been minimized to the extent possible. Since the
impact is only 120 linear feet, mitigation should not be required and none is proposed.
Page 10 of 13
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
Page 11 of 13
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Q., I Multiplier I Required
i Zone* I ,-^Impact
3 (2 for Catawba)
1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. When developed, the site will contain 26.6%
percent impervious surfaces. Impervious surface calculations are provided on an attached sheet.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
When developed, the site will utilize sanitary sewer services provided by the Town of
Gibsonville.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
Page 12 of 13
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: It is
unlikely that this project will result in additional development that could impact nearby
downstream water quali The project will provide reasonably priced housing for residents of
Guilford and Alamance Counties.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 13 of 13
Joseph's Claim
A Single Family Residential Cluster Development
NC Hwy 61 & Church Street
Gibsonville, NC
Owner/Developer: Phil Wilson
Impervious Area Calculations:
Area in subdivision streets: 5.660 Acres±
Clubhouse, pool, tennis. court
& parking area: 0.592 Acres±
Lot built-upon area:
154 lots x 3,000 s.f./lot = 10.606 Acres±
Total Impervious Area: 16.858 Acres±
% Impervious: 16.858 Acres± = 26.6%
63.306 Acres±
Note: All information shown based upon Preliminary Plan prepared by CPT Engineering & Surveying,
Inc., signed and sealed 3-30-06.
SOURCE:
FIGURE 1
N
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
GIBSONVILLE, NC QUADRANGLE SITE LOCATION MAP
DATED 1970, REVISED 1994 APPROXIMATE 62 ACRE TRACT
OSSIPEE, NC QUADRANGLE a CHURCH STREET
GIBSONVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
DATED 1970
SCALE: 1"=2,000' ECS PROJECT NO. G-12103A
cra
Err
64
: ? " 'LC'D t
t ?r
Oil
40
SITE b??y j r r?
! ~?lt ? c ??' .,,.r F ? fYy ?'1 • ? ? ??'i?j( r .. .. X31 ?..
?r' ?-i
,?.
'9 ?,Cr . 3 .. ? `.- y."?," '? ,.? •. ? err '?f i) f ?1 ? '@' -?'h E. 4-'i.. ? `? s?' ,?" ???
? Mr tt. ?
1 . , rr
`\ Y ` `roe..,,, !S ??i? .. << ?? ?' t ?f?..??.e.,- "^?" W 1, I .'?... .?...r^ '"? ?`Y "4 '+. ? rr

SOURCE: N FIGURE 2
USDA SOIL SURVEY
GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

SHEET NO: 24
ISSUED DECEMBER 1977
SOIL SURVEY MAP
APPROXIMATE 62 ACRE SITE

CHURCH STREET
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA

'
"
SCALE: I
= 1,666.67 ECS PROJECT NO. G-12103A

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Approximate 62 Acre Tract - Church Street Project No: Date: February 14, 2006
Applicant/Owner: The Property Shoppe County: Guilford
Investigators: ECS, Ltd. G-12103A State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-1

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? ?Yes ® No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ® No Field Location: View Figure 3
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
Rubus betulifolius
Blackberry Herb FAC
Smilax rotundifolia
Common greenbrier Herb FAC
Lonicera japonica
Japanese honeysuckle Vine FAC-
Liquidambar styraciflua
Sweet gum Tree/Sap FAC+

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-): 75% FAC Neutral:
Numeric Index:
Remarks:
The dominant vegetation is hydrophytic.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
? Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs
Other

® No Recorded Data

Field Observations

Depth of Surface Water: 1"

Depth to Free Water in Pit: Surface

Depth to Saturated Soil: Surface Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators
® Inundated
® Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators
? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
® Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
? FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are present.
(Wetform) Page 1 of 2
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Approximate 62 Acre Tract - Church Street Project No: Date: February 14, 2006
Applicant/Owner: The Property Shoppe County: Guilford
Investigators: ECS, Ltd. G-12103A State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-1
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Enon fine sandy loam
Map Symbol: EnC Mapped Hydric Inclusion? ?Yes ® No
Drainage Class: Well drained

Taxonomy (Subgroup): Ultic hapludalfs Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type: ®Yes
F] No
Profile Descri tion
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc.
0-12 10YR 513 5YR 5/4 10% Loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are not present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ®Yes 0 No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? ?Yes ® No
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are not present. The sampling point is not located in a wetland.
(Wetform) Page 2 of 2
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Approximate 62 Acre Tract- Church Street Project No: Date: February 14, 2006
Applicant/Owner: The Property Shoppe County: Guilford
Investigators: ECS, Ltd. G-12103A State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-2
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? ?Yes ® No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ® No Field Location: View Figure 3
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
Nyssa sylvatica
Black gum Tree/Sap FAC
Smilax rotundifolia
Common greenbrier Herb FAC
Lonicera japonica
Japanese honeysuckle Vine FAC-
Quercus alba
White oak Tree FACU

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-): 50% FAC Neutral:
Numeric Index:
Remarks:
50% of the vegetation is hydrophytic.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
? Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
? Aerial Photographs ® Inundated
? Other ® Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
? Water Marks
® No Recorded Data ? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
Field Observations ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators
Depth of Surface Water: 1" ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
® Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: Surface ? Local Soil Survey Data
? FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: Surface ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are present.
(Wetform) Page 1 of 2
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Approximate 62 Acre Tract - Church Street Project No: Date: February 14, 2006
Applicant/Owner: The Property Shoppe County: Guilford
Investigators: ECS, Ltd. G-12103A State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-2
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Enon fine sandy loam
Map Symbol: EnC Mapped Hydric Inclusion? ?Yes E No
Drainage Class: Well drained Field Observations Confirm Ma ed T e: Yes
pp YP - ® ? No
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Ultic hapludalfs
Profile Descri tion
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc.
0-12 2.5Y 513 5YR 316 30% Loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are not present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? MYes U No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? ?Yes ® No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Eyes ? No
Hydric Soils Present? ?yes E No
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are not present. The sampling point is not located in a wetland.
(Wetform) Page 2 of 2
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Approximate 62 Acre Tract - Church Street Project No: Date: February 14, 2006
Applicant/Owner: The Property Shoppe County: Guilford
Investigators: ECS, Ltd. G-12103A State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-3
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? ?Yes ® No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ® No Field Location: View Figure 3
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
Rubus betulifolius
Blackberry Herb FAC
Smilax rotundifolia
Common greenbrier Herb FAC
Lonicera japonica
Japanese honeysuckle Vine FAC-
Juniperus virginiana
Eastern red cedar Tree/Sap FACU-
Eulalia viminea
Nepal microstegium Herb FAC+
Ligustrum smense
Chinese privet Tree/Sap FAC
Carex sp.
Sedge sp. Herb FAC

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-): 72% FAC Neutral:
Numeric Index:
Remarks:
The dominant vegetation is hydrophytic.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
? Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs
? Other

® No Recorded Data

Field Observations

Depth of Surface Water: 0"

Depth to Free Water in Pit: 3"

Depth to Saturated Soil: 3" Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators
? Inundated
® Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators
? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
® Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
? FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are present.
(Wetform) Page 1 of 2
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetland s Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Approximate 62 Acre Tract- Church Street Project No: Date: February 14, 2006
Applicant/Owner: The Property Shoppe County: Guilford
Investigators: ECS, Ltd. G-12103A State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-3
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Iredell fine sandy loam
Map Symbol: IrB
Mapped Hydric Inclusion? ?Yes ® No
Drainage Class: Moderately well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic hapludalfs Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type: ®Yes ? No
Profile Descri tion
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc.
0-12 2.5Y 513 0% Loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are not present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ®Yes ? No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ? No
Hydric Soils Present? ?Yes ® No
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are not present. The sampling point is not located in a wetland.
(Wetform) Page 2 of 2

'91'24 C ? 3
N05.3f?4'e ? ?
? /
/
Y '?
'{
- f
9
>
I (450.06) ?{Y
-
916 I }q
?4d• I
D ' ir Nh I
N w/
I
l J
l
r
!'
am
i
i / w
(l
l
l
,g
h
m
i ?
?
m
''
a
?
s°Rsald °u?
C
O?
?o ? hhQ

7 oe r M =
J 3

NigO i i P`i

/

/ /
M jd u zz O
X
o

jl U
/
LL

E
n
>?> Jy ,
S N s 6 / / I
J x
0 ?' 1

J ? Ili

? d g 3? v vv \ tr )
\ )?r i
GS E6 .S Gi G
4 .6 1x 9x RE R; Yo??d yY u?Gg 'as ?e 6: -- =6 :6 5> G: _?

a a

?a "
A
a
Y
x
?=
wy
?

s

et

c&

mw

ssaa

at

a°se

a

?

BY

?k

f

bu

a?

g

's

'

i$
'
°
5 8i $? iS?
f
' [? ? ?? gY b yR
C8

Y

`a c;

s ?

? srq

sf

'tl Y

u ?8

,e ?N

a Y4

Y ¢y

. ?6

Y??a

a;
y
d?

u
Ga?
N
i

g

?:

?
1
?B

L
BS

li-
9 ?s

t
.8

S

Y

?
d dd d dd 'd d d dd dd dd dd ,Add dd dd d dd dd jd d dd d dd dd dn n
---_---------
Y
1 1
I ?
I 1
c y HMO,;
HNN
?(III i ? I I ??????
N? 1
I
1
1 -
1
1
1
I
81
1
1 ?
1 ?,1
si
Y
q.? ? ? LE,E L i
he
z swe?.nee..?1
. ? ?' 3i.? ?+ee a>b Q?
asoi wG>I
40

U it

3
*? p p?P,A ?4 4 ? x ? j
- ----------------- -- -- - - -- - -
i51BWW1LLF- NORTH q
Z WETLANDS DELINEATION MAP FOR
in - EN6II?ERIN6 AND SURVEYING, INC.
PHIL WILSON
'' 9ALVKN PROPERTY
?ae, mUa>iero - rwcixN eu<'rm
8 ROCK _ REEr orNSHIP - &JICOUNTY
CAROLINA

Z
?O
r,...w? 24ukrnl \\
C_ tYetl__"g?'c-.'?d Y-]upe o - Yes se .sr '
1'24t ?/3q?' -CC kk--.7 $w?$$?8'9$e. X48dab.YcS466St„°$?y9y_Z<k$kPW4p:?°e?68??
p l , I it ,? i / 4GD',IJpI , o ?' R ^? 505'41'?D' .. R - _ f
Q ' III // e o a R g LMb5?F3$°iigY#b'?gl°p SF $1b E= y ¢ m4ii 3' 1/I l1 , II IIII to !t ly }\ W n `# 4. 6 1 1 / • ? • I
rfI ? 2r!,/l? i ?/lyy? ??_ N a \ 6A`Y ?p - i I 1 ' 1 / I?1 '/ \ 1
/ ? At? / 1 IAI '!1 l?8 N ` ? ll ! ` V / 1 J , ' `
j ' In w Itil ?' ? a
/I Ilr / mb/p ? ?I ? a , 1 'V\.? 1 Bil R f I 11, I
/'??"G,?P:%, ?' ti. ,e a1 19. ?? II •1 1 _,`"° '-9'11 'I ? e ? \
"?'???i ???r? ?l' X t Y¢ ? / / a is 1 1 ?\/ 1 C'r .N ? II '// :''' I \??`? ?
-' ? L. ? i IY O,?- a? 11 \I? , bG'. ?; - ' ?u i ? ,1 /a , _ III I???? ??F. J
? , ?/ D 1 I 1 1 I/ l ? ,I
I`? '1 ` '/" ; 1 I \ II ( 1 IIIIII ON
i ---- \ a I / ?` F \ l 1 1\\ 1 I 11\ \ 3o
'14 ro q ?, \ I?
-M I
1\//'---- - ^I- -? C rt j 1 PYYS IY` d I >< 11 `\ a \ \\ \` \ \ . \'
' >< X ICI R N Na - 9. ,? >< ?I•laYz y: N 1 %\\\` `I1?\ ?'?/' '`\
aa.
roc-` I \ ^}\ T 6 Z 1/??1' d W I 1 1
?? IC ;yfj?? %l\ \ `I 1? '6- ? ? a i A . * 4 ___ ? d/ ,?/? P1 I 4.1 jl \II\ 1, \` L` , I o
YS ; .?L !/ ?! 1 `\ 1' \\ 'D 6_- ? _ ?, / bbbtlll` 4 ?' \ \ \ 1 / ' y /I i 1 I 1 ' I
. ? ? II 11 1 -i l\ \\ \\ ` b _- Sl _ ? ?` \ '' d --?/y?µ d , ? P \` \ `\`1\ `\ /?/ II I ? I _ `- / 1
0 00g //
'` `\ \\ ypppDyy ?Pi II \ ` `? \ _ ''' ?w ?j ,+_? -- 101- - Ip `?\`\` 1 ['? `l?/\ i\\1?-? / I'`I I
8 z
? Q. \111\11 r 1r.i -i ? i 11
I " ?O
x. \ INN.
1? /; ? i6 1
xY 8 333 YYYlll 1 \ 1 `V 1 \ ` \ a ?' _ i - /_14t1J'1 , r I a 1 i? I I I I 1 y, 1 1
It I I / 4l ??? ? / I ? Fo9 1 ? \ \ ?'h ? a / l- a '1{/m???, . , I „ 1 1 1\ \ \ \
@ d '/ ? _ .O• - /Y (/B1 11 1\ `\ \ `\ \ `
vgq ??,? I d , m
, I I 0\'?q OY' N 1 I I 1 \ , d --- _ . / I 11 1 I \ ? ` ` `
\-
I / I ypR ? , 1 ? I \ \` ? \ ? . Y_' ! ?/? • / ' i / 1 \y 111 I i '3 \ (: I• ?'
\ \ `I 06 £? `\\/ (? `? \ \\. - \` \ ?d ? A// 0' • 4 8fiI II N it\1 I\ 11 \\ /
11 1 i D /.' / al
/ I' I I '/ d \ >t \d1 \?i? / / ?a.l ,` I u/ t1` `\\ 1 \ \\ \`\\``\
,,; /? __ -'moo •' / ` ? / ,? / / It \ \ `` ?/

\
fill
all
1,111 pall
Jill
;i
`c- ? -
> iC y I? W: TLANDS DELINEATION MAP FOR

?? PHIL WILSON E NbItZER1N6 AND SURVEYING. ING.
???mP p
3

d
v
?L
3 Q? BALDWIN PROPERTY
R.0-1K GREEK TOY'PBNIP - GUILFORD GOVNTY

A m .,ow.w a.?ce - suam

"? - Way 1°
61BSOWILLE, NORTH CAROLIN
r I/
P ? xT ? w
N
P
/? A W P - ¢ N P ? ? tea.
? ,C? ?tid b
.1? m r O r p a a" ?P AI
? P
?? ?? r M ? a. 9 y o
r ww?
/ ?Y O r N
w a
J /
/ P p a
N L a
A s.
A e lam' W a _w /\ ? „q
w A.. * w a O ?? t) On ; ?I?1

f 8F ?? d ?
Y 6>

t B
a9 `p

GfS i6 :S Li dL =6 ?5? °x ?SY WU ?? YC ?o?I: W? ?? io : s Si W? ?b :'o ?'e G: GG •?
?y
gy 6s
u8 "'_
8a y
&§ 8y
$e e>:
8 °x
°3 yx
8tl iio
5y aBl
$S e-
$w °-
SS -
68bi
v°
8w
$9 "
y? a
$Y s
$k -
R; <s
gy "i ?i
88 Sg
. ..
j ? y f

YY
B
U's
o8
Y4
?k
8
''
Sm
W
;
gT
Y?
1 .
1
S
g
?Y
S±
o?
b'S
S x
:
19
5
9
MM x
MM MM MM M dM MA u
dd Ad dd s
dd ..
dd M d' d
d A dd t d dM _ O NS
'd dd A A d
w
v
O?

1 00
d N
O 0 ?? / \ \ I I O\\ d A d
% w tl
O ?? ?:? ?? /? J ?? I??tt- 111
?? 'p A?4t ?€ t ? / ? ? v
WETLANDS DELINEATION MAP FOR
PHIL WILSON
BALPY41N PROPERTY
A ?! ROCK GR[EK TOY41,5HIP GUILFORD COUNTY
3 M &IBSOWILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
)-;1," 7
C n ryq
1 y41 ??? ?i
I ?V 4g>
1
n ,
1 /
P u /i
p 1 //
O 1 //
s _
i B r_;.•
it ® I ?' i® u i 1
II
?E,q/ywT uyM?r/G I 1,,1 I
II
I\
? 111
J ? I ?,11
\
1 ,\
1\
O \\
m
? O ?. I w w. 1 ???
1
5
III
0
EN6INEERI. AND SURVEYING, INC.
` T wo oeao..exr carad?
ww nms
wale, raw ax-eew -? tmu axxo
t

REV151ONS
TOTAL STREAM IMPACT: 120 L.F.

50' ROW
32' B-B
I "PER FT. I6 114'%FT _ /"PER FT.

2H: IV MAX. \
2 2H: IV MAX.
?D
N.G.D.O.T. nl
N
G
0
0
T
HEADWALL .
.
.
.
.
HEAODH WALL
EX15T.
5URFAGE
-' `50 L.F.
GLA53 I RIP-RAP
70 L.F. ti 36" RCP
WOAD 6RO55 5E6TION
N. T.S.
q
Z p?
w z
M.ROAD
cws5-xcna+
SCALE.
NME
• - PRO-=T. 546-M
L PYPENIY p!aIMAML
eecRN: a w.Y aMAM N nurtsa •Ax P amwm¢VOrNwaa DRAM CYi HYWJJ
Oa WN PoOAO? !a^I aG wbN?YN
cpewrciwn xo. as a vm?.ne own ?av. auo wr.unwr ro ?+ SHOT