20060780 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20060509

Eco rbt I**-
stem
PROGRAM
INVOICE
Steve Martin
Breakaway Land Company
9 Clarks Chapel Ridge Road
Weaverville, NC 28787
Project: Breakaway County: Madison
ccv V
()to - or) RD

September 22, 2006
DWQ#: 06-0780
USACE#: 2006-32914-357
You have elected to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements of the Section 401/404 permit issued for the above
reference project through payment of a fee to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program. In accordance with 15A
NCAC 21-1.0500, your fee has been calculated as follows (Please note: payment of wetlands is calculated in increments of
0.25 acres). If you have any questions concerning this payment, please call Carol Shaw at 919-733-5205.
Stream
Total amount. of payment
299 linear feet x $ 232.00 = $ 69,368.00
$ 69,368.00
Please mail a check made payable to
"North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program"
for the total amount to the address below.
NC DENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Please note that a payment made to the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program is not reimbursable unless a request for
reimbursement is received within 12 months of the date of the receipt. Any such request must be accompanied by letters
from the permitting agencies stating that the permit and/or authorization have been rescinded.
YOU MUST BE IN POSSESSION OF THE PAYMENT RECEIPT FROM THE NC ECOSYSTEM
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM PRIOR TO COMMENCING THE ACTIVITIES AUTHORIZED BY THE
DEPARTMENT OF ARMY PERMIT AND/OR THE 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION.
ccl?/indy Karoly, DWQ-Wetlands/401
Rebekah Newton, USACE-Asheville
Kevin Barnett, DWQ-Asheville !] r=
File
OCT 2 "ZOQ6
DENR . WATER QUALITY
WET.A1403 AND STORMWATER 9RANCN
JiZ"tor' ... f:. KAA" ... Prot7 oar .ft-A& AAM?
MUM
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 1919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net
O?OF wATFgQG Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
6? -7
f; North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
y
Division of Water Quality
July 3, 2006
DWQ Project # 06-0780
Madison County
?l D
Stephen Martin
Breakaway Land Company JUL 0 7 2006
9 Clarks Chapel Ridge Road
Weaverville, NC 28787-9527 Dr-14K =waYaaouRL%
L ND$ STCA?dVa'.A7fFi t!Mivky
Subject Property: Breakaway
Scenic Wolf Laurel, Madison County
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Martin:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed
below, to place fill within or otherwise impact 0.365 acres of wetlands and 299 linear
'feet of streams for the purpose of property development at the subject property, as
described within your application received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
on May 9, 2006. After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are
covered by General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3402 (GC3402). • The
Certification (s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 39 when issued by the US Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE). In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with
any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project
including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, Non-discharge, stormwater,
and buffer regulations. Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts
or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the activities described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval
letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total fills for this
project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream,
compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h).
This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and
any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
o Carolina
Nm
NturallY
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Brealaway Land Company, LLC `
Page 2 of 8
July 3,2006
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific
and general conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met.
No other impacts are approved including incidental impacts:
Amount Approved
(Units) Plan Location or Reference
Wetland A 0.04 (acres) Fill
Wetland B 0.05 (acres) Fill
Wetland E 0.005 (acres) Fill
Pre-Application 0.27 acres Fill
UT to Puncheon Fork 262 linear feet Culvert
UT to Puncheon Fork 12 (linear feet Culvert
UT to Puncheon Fork 25 linear feet Culvert
2. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all
specifications governing the proper design, installation and operation and
maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to protect surface
waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be
designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning
and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and
erosion control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the
requirements specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on
all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including
contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be
designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most
recent version of the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the
reclamation in accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation
Pollution Control Act.
Brealaway Land Company, LLC
Page 3 of 8
July 3,2006
3. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian
areas beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction
Notification. All construction activities, including the design, installation, operation,
and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices,
shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes,
or rules occur.
4. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters
to the maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control
devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the
natural grade restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land
Resources has released the project.
5. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification
or applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is
required to return the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit,
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC,
27699-1650.
6. Stream Stabilization (Final Plan Needed)
Before any of the impacts authorized in this Certification occur, you must provide
and receive written approval from this Office for a final stream restoration plan for
the stream segments which currently flow adjacent to the proposed ski slope.
The plan must include designs and specifications that meet the definition of
stream restoration (or enhancement if no relocation is proposed) according to the
latest version of the Internal Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina
(available at http://h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/strmgide.htm1). The stream
and buffer relocation must be constructed, maintained, and monitored according
to the plans approved by this Office. Any repairs or adjustments to the site must
be made according to the approved plans or must receive written approval from
this Office to make the repairs or adjustments. The created stream must be
preserved in perpetuity by use of a conservation easement or other similar
mechanism as part of this approval.
A. Deed Restrictions - Deed restrictions or similar mechanisms shall be
placed on the lot to assure compliance with the conditions of this variance
approval. These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any
waters or buffers. The Deed Restrictions shall include the following
paragraph.
Brealaway Land Company, LLC '
Page 4 of 8
July 3, 2006
"The areas shown on the recorded plat as Riparian Buffer Protection
Areas shall be maintained in perpetuity in their natural or mitigated
condition. No person or entity shall fill, grade, excavate, or perform any
other land disturbing activities; nor cut, remove, or harm any vegetation;
nor construct any structures or add any additional impervious surfaces, on
such protected areas without written authorization from the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ). This covenant is intended to ensure continued
compliance with authorizations issued by the State of North Carolina,
Division of Water Quality, DWQ Project Number 03-1030, and therefore
may be enforced by the State of North Carolina. This covenant is to run
with the land, and shall be binding on the Owner, and all parties claiming
under it."
B. Riparian Buffer Protection Areas - The "Riparian Buffer Protection Areas"
shall include all restored riparian buffers as a condition of this approval.
(25 linear feet from top of bank on both sides of all jurisdictional streams).
7. Diffuse Flow
All constructed stormwater conveyance outlets shall be directed and maintained
as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through the protected stream buffers
such that it will not re-concentrate before discharging into a stream. If this is not
possible, it may be necessary to provide stormwater facilities that are considered
to remove nitrogen. This may require additional approval from this Office.
8. Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction
corridor within these boundaries approved under this authorization shall be
clearly marked with orange warning fencing (or similar high visibility material) for
the areas that have been approved to infringe within the buffer, wetland or water
prior to any land disturbing activities.
9. Turbidity Standard
The turbidity standard of 10 NTUs (Nephelometric Turbidity Units) shall not be
exceeded as described in 15 A NCAC 2B. .0200. Appropriate sediment and
erosion control practices must be used to meet this standard. Continuous
monitoring by onsite, calibrated, continuous recording, equipment must be
performed both upstream and downstream of any instream work. The results of
this monitoring must be submitted along with the below required stability
monitoring. Additionally, should the results indicate a violation of the turbidity
standard, all work shall cease until such a point the measures are implemented
to protect surface waters form further violations.
Brealaway Land Company, LLC
Page 5 of 8
July 3, 2006
10. No Sediment and Erosion Control Measures in Wetlands
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters
to the maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control
devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the
natural grade restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land
Resources or locally delegated program has released the project.
11. Construction Stormwater Permit NCG010000
Upon the approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan issued by the
Division of Land Resources (DLR) or a DLR delegated local erosion and
sedimentation control program, an NPDES General stormwater permit
(NCG010000) administered by DWQ is automatically issued to the project. This
General Permit allows stormwater to be discharged during land disturbing
construction activities as stipulated by conditions in the permit. If your project is
covered by this permit [applicable to construction projects that disturb one (1) or
more acres], full compliance with permit conditions including the sedimentation
control plan, self-monitoring, record keeping and reporting requirements are
required. A copy of this permit and monitoring report forms may be found at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/Forms Documents.htm.
12. Deed Restrictions
Deed restrictions or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained
jurisdictional wetlands, waters and protective buffers throughout all properties
contiguous with the properties disclosed within this application (and any future
parcels contiguous with these properties to be developed) in order to assure
compliance for future wetland, water and buffer impact. These mechanisms shall
be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or buffers approved
for impact under this Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate.
13. Temporary Fills
All temporary fill and culverts shall be removed and the impacted area returned
to the original grade, including each stream's original cross sectional dimensions,
planform pattern, and longitudinal bed and bed profile after construction is
complete or within 6 months of the establishment of the crossing, which ever is
sooner, and the various sites shall be stabilized with natural woody vegetation
(except for the maintenance areas of permanent utility crossings) and restored to
prevent erosion. If the crossings are not completely removed and restored as
described above within the specified time above, additional written approval from
this Office must be obtained to modify this condition.
Brealaway Land Company, LLC
Page 6 of 8
July 3, 2006
14. Culvert Installation
Culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the
original stream profiles are not altered. Existing stream dimensions (including the
cross section dimensions, pattern, and longitudinal profile) must be maintained
above and below locations of each culvert. Culverts shall be designed and
installed to allow for aquatic life movement as well as to prevent head cutting of the
streams. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched, the appropriate
stream grade shall be re-established or, if the pipes installed in a perched manner,
the pipes shall be removed and re-installed correctly.
Culvert(s) shall not be installed in such a manner that will cause aggradation or
erosion of the stream up or down stream of the culvert(s). Existing stream
dimensions (including the cross section dimensions, pattern and longitudinal
profile) shall be maintained above and below locations of each culvert. Therefore,
you must provide plans with adequate details that indicate that the current stability
of the stream will be maintained or enhanced. You must receive written approval
from this Office for the above plans before the culvert(s) is installed. Culvert(s)
must be installed according to approved plans.
The establishment of native, woody vegetation and other soft stream bank
stabilization techniques must be used where practicable instead of rip rap or
other bank hardening methods. If rip-rap is necessary, it shall not be placed in
the stream bed, unless specifically approved by the Division of Water Quality.
15. Riparian Zone Replanting
Replanting of vegetation within disturbed areas located within 25 feet of the
streambank or wetland edges, associated with any land. disturbing activity, repair,
replacement and/or maintenance must be done in a manner consistant with the
Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration immediately following construction.
(Please see attached.)
17. In stream construction and disturbance shall be prohibited within 25 feet of the top of
banks except where permitted crossings will occur.
16. If concrete is used during construction (e.g., headwalls), a dry work area must be
maintained to prevent direct contact between curing concrete and stream water.
Water that inadvertently contacts live concrete should not be discharged to surface
waters due to the potential for water chemistry change and a fish kill.
17. Rock, sand, or other materials should not be dredged from the stream channels
except in the immediate vicinity of the crossings. Instream dredging has severe
effects on aquatic life and disturbance of the natural form of the channel can cause
downstream erosion problems. The natural dimension, pattern, and profile of the
channels adjacent to the crossings should not be modified by widening or changing
their depths.

Brealaway Land Company, LLC
Page 7 of 8
July 3, 2006
18. Sandbags, flexible pipe, or other diversion structures should be used to avoid
excavation in flowing water. Materials used for flow diversions must be removed
from the stream bed after completing the construction work. Any diversion channels
must be lined with fabric and/or rock.
19. Storm water from roads should be directed to vegetated buffer areas (e.g. level
spreaders) or retention basins and not routed directly to streams. Drop inlets on
streams must not be constructed.
20.Any riprap placed for inlet or outlet stabilization should be clean and limited to the
stream bank below the high water mark and vegetation should be used above. Rip
rap must not be placed in stream channels in a manner that obstructs fish passage.
21.All crossings should be constructed as close to perpendicular to the stream channels
as possible to minimize stream and buffer disturbance. Road and utility alignments
should be set-back as far as possible from stream channels to minimize
sedimentation and buffer disturbance.
22. Riparian vegetation, especially trees and shrubs, should be preserved as much as
possible. Native woody vegetation (e.g., rhododendron, dog hobble, silky dogwood,
sycamore, river birch, red maple) should be reestablished upstream and
downstream of the stream crossings if it is removed during construction to provide
bank stability and shading. We encourage the use of native plants that must be
removed from permanently disturbed areas.
23.All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters should be inspected and
maintained regularly to prevent contamination of stream waters from fuels,
lubricants, hydraulic fluids or other toxic materials.
24. Discharging hydroseed mixtures and washing out hydroseeders and other
equipment in or adjacent to surface waters is prohibited.
25.The remaining lengths of streams and riparian areas on the tract should be
protected in either their existing or improved state (i.e. with native vegetation
reestablished where absent) in perpetuity from fill, vegetation removal, and other
forms of disturbance with deed restrictions or similar instrument. A riparian buffer
width of 25 feet is minimally consistent with the "trout buffer rule", but wider buffers
are recommended to provide more water quality and habitat functions.
26.All jurisdictional waters on the site shall be inspected weekly for stability (longitudinal
profile, cross sectional dimension, and pattern) and a monthly report submitted to
the Asheville Regional Office within 15 days of the end of each month.
27. Bottomless Culverts must span from high bank to high bank. The digging of footers
which change the flow of the stream, or otherwise impact the natural course on the
stream are prohibited.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification
and may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your
proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application and
as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA
Permit.
Brealaway Land Company, LLC
Page8 of8
July 3, 2006
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the
approved wetland or stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You
must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing,
send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,
N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you
ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of
the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly in the
Central Office in Raleigh at 919-733-9721 or Kevin Barnett in the DWQ Asheville
Regional Office at either Kevin. Barnett(ancmail.net or at 828-296-4657.
Sincerely,
for an W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
AW Klkhb
Enclosures: GC 3402
Certificate of Completion
Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration
cc: USACE Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Cyndi Karoly, DWQ 401 Central Office
DLR Asheville Regional Office
David McHenry, NC Wildlife Resources Commission
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 06-0780. Breakaway.approval
P't I**--
-?Ecos stem
k
PROGRAM
Clement Riddle
Clearwater Environmental Consultants, Inc.
718 Oakland Street
Hendersonville, NC 28791
May 12, 2006
Project: Breakaway County: Madison
'DwA ZCO(ovT 8o
(= R1601
p@wwm P
MAY 3 0 2006
DENR - WATER QUALI TY
WETIM08 AND B owNATEA BWl9
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NC EEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send
copies of the 404/401/LAMA permits to NC EEP. Once NC EEP receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or the 401
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
River Basin Wetlands Stream Buffer Buffer
i Cataloging (Acres) (Linear Feet) Zone 1 Zone 2
Unit (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
Riparian on-Riparian Coastal Marsh Cold Cool Warm
French Broad 0 0 0 0 299 0 0 0
06010105
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted impacts
up to a 2:1 ratio, (buffers, Zone 1 at a 3:1 ratio and Zone 2 at a 1.5:1 ratio). The type and amount of the compensatory
mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 Permit and/or 401 Water Quality Certification, and/or CAMA Permit. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Chris Mankoff at [phone].
Sincerely,
U FOZ
William D. Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Rebekah Newton, USACE - Asheville
Kevin Barnett, DWQ Regional Office - Asheville
File
R"t7oraetg... ... Prot" 0" .State,
ALMA
NCDENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net
Triage Check List
Date: 5/11/06
Kevin Barnett, Asheville Regional Office
To:
60-day Processing Time: 5/09/06 to 7/07/06
From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone: [phone]
Project Name: Breakaway
DWQ #:06-0780
County: Madison

The rile attached is being forwarded to you for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks!
CLEARWATER ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTANTS, INC.
300 N. Main Street, Suite 202
Hendersonville, NC 28792
[phone]
FAX [phone]
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NC Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
P/1'
RECEI! D
DATE:
5-08-06 PROJECT:
ATTENTION:
RE: Breakaway 2 0 0 6 0 7 8 0

WE ARE SENDING YOU ? ATTACHED ? UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
COPIES DATE NO. I DESCRIPTION
5 Mav 8.2005 Nationwide Permit 39 reouest
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECK BELOW:
® For approval
® For your use
? As requested
? For review and comment
? Approved as submitted
? Approved as noted
? Returned for corrections
? Materials returned after loan to us

? Resubmit copies for approval
? Submit copies for distribution
? Return corrected prints
MAY ? X106
REMARKS:
pFt?! R; ti ??t??axr y ???nr+M?gH
i?n'w
Enclosed are 5 copies of 401 Nationwide Permit 39 applications.
We have sent copies directly to Kevin Barnett, DWQ Asheville office and Dave McHenry, NC WRC in
Waynesville.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or comments regarding enclosed report.
COPY TO: Kevin Barnett, WRC, USACE SIGNED:
CLEARWATER ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
z
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 2 0 0 6 0 7 8 0
k.i a„y pa, t UU a, ,«,,. ,S uui app,icaoie Co mis project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
F] Section 10 Permit Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here:
7% 7 WD
II. Applicant Information
the
1. Owner/Applicant Information M
Name:
Mailing Address
c/o Steve
Land Company, L.L.C. :X
9 Clarks Chapel Ridge Rd
Weaverville NC 28787-9527
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: R. Clement Riddle
Company Affiliation: Clearwater Environmental
Mailing Address: 718 Oakland Street
Hendersonville NC
28791
Telephone Number: 828-698-9800 Fax Number: 828-698-9003
E-mail Address: criddle(a,cwenv.com
Page 5 of 13
i
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Breakaway
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): P.B. 360 PG. 254
4. Location
County: Madison Nearest Town: Mars Hill
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Breakaway
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): North on I-26 from
Asheville. Take Exit 3. Take a right at the bottom of the off ramp Go 200 yards to the "°T"
intersection ad take a left. Go approximately 1 mile and take a left on Laurel Valley Road
Go approximately % mile and take a left on Puncheon Fork Road Go several miles and take
a right onto Wolf Ridge Road. Go uD Wolf Ridge Road about 1 mile There are signs for
Breakaway on your left.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 3556.77 ON 8230.93 °W
6. Property size (acres): Phase I approximately 48 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Puncheon Fork
8. River Basin: French Broad
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 6 of 13
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The proposed ski slope was cleared and graded in February-
March of 2006. The remaining site is forested with numerous logging roads Land use in the
vicinity includes residential resort development ski slopes and commercial buildings
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
proposed project includes, a ski slope ski village center (lodge rental equipment equipment
storage, and shops), residential housing and roads. Equipment used includes bulldozers
backhoes
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the work is to construct a ski
slope and village center. Impacts are proposed to allow suitable area to for the ski lift ski
slope and essential facilities associated with the ski village center and project purpose
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. Mr. Kevin Barnett, NCDWQ, visited the site in March 2005 and notified
the applicant of the presence of jurisdictional streams and wetlands The applicant has since had
all jurisdictional areas within Phase 1 of Breakaway delineated Steve Lund USACE and Kevin
Barnett attended a pre-application meeting on April 18, 2006 at the site to examine 'urisdictional
areas and discuss proposed project plans and discuss unauthorized impacts The following
information in this application is the result of this meeting.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
Yes, Phase II ski resort and road system may affect jurisdictional areas However, planning
design, and environmental studies have not been completed at this time
Page 7 of 13
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The applicant is submitting this
after-the-fact permit for the previous construction activities and proposed activities These
activities include the construction of a ski slope The location for the proposed ski slope was
part of the original Wolf Laurel Ski Resort Master Plan most of which was built 30 years
ago. The applicant obtained a sediment and erosion control permit to construct the project in
the fall of 2005. At the time of land clearing the applicant was unaware of any stream or
wetlands within this area of the project During land clearing activities there was water sheet
flow in several- locations on the proposed ski slope The applicant constructed a new
channel-ditch on the southern side of the ski slope Following this activily, the applicant was
notified by the NC Division of Water Quality that this newly constructed manmade channel
was a stream and that this project contains jurisdictional waters of the US (wetlands and
streams). The applicant has since stopped all work in wetlands/streams and has held an on
site meeting with Kevin Barnett NCDW and Steve Lund USACE to discuss the Project.
permitting, existing impacts and jurisdictional areas
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flnndinu

Wetland Impact

Site Number
Type of Wetland
Located within Distance
to Nearest
Area of

(indicate on of Impact
Type
(e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year
Flood lain
Stream Im act
p

map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) (yes/no) (linear (acres)
feet)
A Fill Seep No 10 0.04
B Seep No 150 0.05
E Seep No 10 0.005
Pre-application Fill Seep No 0.27
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.365
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: ApproximateJy
0.43 acres total (disturbed and undisturbed) for Phase 1
Page 8 of 13
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
1
Stream Name

N/A
Type of Impact

N/A
Perennial t
Intermittent?
N/A Average
Stream Width
Before Impact
N/A Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
N/A
2 UT to Puncheon Fork Culvert Perennial 3 262 .01
3 UT to Puncheon Fork Culvert Perennial 3 12 0.0008
4 UT to Puncheon Fork culvert perennial 3 25 0.0017

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 0.012
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dred2ina, flooding. drainage- hullchenrle etc
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
N/A Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project-
Stream Impact (acres): 0.012
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.365
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.377
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 299
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
Page 9 of 13
8. Pond Creation NONE
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Wetland impacts occurred
during the construction/grading of the proposed ski slope Based on our discussions with Steve
Lund, USAGE, it is our opinion that the ski slope area contained small wetland seeps along the
ski slope area. Based on the size of delineated wetland seeps ClearWater Environmental
estimates that unauthorized impacts to wetland seeps total approximately 0.27 acres. Impacts
were the result of grading the ski slope to an appropriate percent slope and adequate width for
skiing and safety. As a result of the slope construction a new stream channel has been
constructed along the southern edge of the ski slope The banks are well defined and a
considerable effort has been made to stabilize the stream banks (pictures attached) As a result
of the pre-application meeting with DWQ and USACE the applicant has made numerous
revisions to the site plan to accommodate the proposed village center. The Village Center at
Breakaway is an essential part of the project purpose The village will incorporate ski
operations, lodge, shops dining and In order to accommodate these facilities the
applicant is proposing to impact 299 linear feet of stream Breakaway's original village center
design would impact approximately 430 linear feet Several changes to the site plan now
incorporate the stream within the project area The elimination of approximately 130 linear feet
of proposed impact is a significant avoidance measure undertaken b the applicant The
applicant has also minimized impacts by utilizing old logging culverts and reducing the width of
stream disturbance at the proposed road crossings
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 10 of 13
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Breakaway is proposing to mitigate for 299 linear feet of impact to streams by
participating in the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program It is important to note that this
stream channel was created by the applicant during land clearing activities Approximately
550 linear feet of newly constructed stream channel will be avoided as it flows along the
southern border of the new ski slope No mitigation for wetlands are proposed as impacts to
wetlands are minor.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):_
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Page 11 of 13
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes E] No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
Zone I extenas out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0244, or .0260.
Page 12 of 13
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Impervious area for Phase I of the Project is
approximately 20 percent.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Connect to centralized private waste water facility.
XM. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ® No ?
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ® No ?
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No ?
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV.
Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 13 of 13
NORTH CAROLINA ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM, NCEEP
IN LIEU FEE REQUEST FORM
NOTE: Revised 4/19/06
Print this form, fill in required information, sign and date, and either mail to NCEEP, 1652 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652, or fax to 919-715-2219. Attachments are acceptable for clarification
purposes.
?1. Name of Applicant or Agent i ---- --
Clement Riddle
2. Name of Business of Applicant or Agent
? Clearwater Environmental Consultants
Inc.
j 3. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box) ,
F __------------ --
-_ 718 Oakland Street
14. City, State, Zip
E __..-----_-._-

Hendersonville, NC 28791
5. Telephone (eg, 919-555-1212) i -
828-698-9800
6. Fax (optional)
828-698-9003
? 7. E-mail (optional)
? --
iddl
n
f

___._____.-__. ___-
.-P._
8 Gr
e@cwe
v.com
---
roject
. Name
i Breakaway
j 9. Project Location (nearest town, city) i
I Mars Hill
10. Lat-Long Coordinates (optional)

C 11. Project County 35 56.77 N 82 30.93W
Madison
12. River Basin - --'---
t
1 French Broad
13. Cataloging Unit (8-digit)
06010105
j 14. Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.) (e.g., 0.13) N/A
i
15. Non-Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.) ! N/A

16. Coastal Marsh Impact (ac.)
i I N/A
17. Stream Impacts-Cold (ft.) (e.g. 1,234) 299
18. Stream Impact-Cool (ft.) NN/A
19. Stream Impact-Warm (ft.) N/A ?~ --- -
I
20. Buffer Impact-Zone 1 (sq. ft.) (e.g. 12,345) _
j N/A - ------
21. Buffer Impact-Zone 2 (sq. ft.) ( N/A
Check) below if this request is a: _ revision Signature pplicant or Agent:
to a current acceptance, or re-submission of
an expired acceptance -

i
A-n g;
I Date: '
Buffer mitigation applicable only in the Neuse, Tar-Pamlico and Catawba River basins, and the Randleman Lake Water i
Supply Watershed.
For help in determining the Cataloging Unit, go to EPA's "Surf Your Watershed" web page:
http://cfpub.epa.gov/surfAocaterindex.cfm
Direct all questions to Chris Mankoff at 919-716-1921 or [e-mail]

rt w i I ?r + r + r? > sp.p c
Bpq4CH
52
/ r ? ?? ?l ? ? /) fishy
' - •??"'r Boar ort ` \ J ``! ^ `,-, 1.
127
f `rc f? ?/ r
y 4 i ( ? /J
L r ?y 1i 'J;tt
yy }"' ? ? r
.,: ? _ ? iw ?? JI---J??' (- y???? ? ? ? Ate' ? Y \ ? : ? ?i •>
r.
21
JTy: i. i tiy' _ pv, 2 .,e i-I,-'-'*-. ?t, '.
4 ?v. ,a ? fit- '?t`?'? r-: J (??, `' ! r ,? ,n ,w_2 ? r ?
Y, 1
VI,
All
?" ?ti ? l?? ' ter.. .o? -l?l . • 1''? ? ? ?? M„
m? 1
I s._
CLEARWATER
Breakaway Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Madison County, 718 Oakland Street
North Carolina Hendersonville, NC 28791
Vicinity Map
Figure 1

B2-33000' W 05/04106 11}1
- , 8r32 ow w 82- 31.00d W 82.30 OOd W M 6¢•z9 r o w ?i S1
-77
ITY
l o? i ( e?oa.m {??'ta C ?? (,1+'n tjTtl atl
c (? ? _? } / t? o It ll 5 ?? F ?' ??? _ -
00
^I t \ i Ste. 9 z
ti
pn
C-j
rIte` f ,? J Project Site
11 1. p v p 1 r ?. ./ i l?
r
l r
?r 1 r? N1=s iii ! 5J r?
-_i
,( t s
?Z (_ '?li ?r K I r 7 A LN g (?, T t '*z
i F .Yn y, 1 .l f ? I (? ems. ? tw Ga3-
.
82.33.000' W Br32.00d W _ • JQ -%
82.31.000P W 82.30.000, w -G584 8r29.000, w
MNfTN Q ? „? ..
po?tSkll 1 •ro iOwif6
Mp wY.tl ?QY TOPoN OID¢t N.GSd O.?yYY (...ymlpy?.pY? ®nopo)
CLEARWATER
Breakaway Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Madison County, 718 Oakland Street USGS Sams Gap Topographic Map
North Carolina Hendersonville, NC 28791 Figure 2
828-698-9800
9o0Z AV" '*u"9, 81B-ol9 °,• NVId 311S - S,LDVdWI g C? 5 p
:a o MI-09-M :o?o4d
LSLK VNnOlIVO HL??lIO0N '3TINN3AV3N 131111 ONNIVLD :oN W(W
aoo '1S NIVN 'N CUrL,L %06 '0'd VNnouvo N1MON 138n1 eIOM
1.1Nn00 NOSIOVN 1 10 l ioo4
NN
Mw lA:1 G?:f.'e'r 1G PIi Lnr l'fl a,l ,Pi A7 1181HX3 10483d
1L7?1 N7:)v9 "I ll l..
==R- NIY` 2440040 0 )d 'dnu) will ?T)??pJ AIN1no?o/ NOSIC/e?N ' 1/38n?yi --1oM ?
YO SNOKSIWB SNOKN321 'ON NHr u6p _-'`•••r'`?••... /? V M V /l V ??? :'ON 1004!
C'ati _ DC
C=b
Ing
Q. ?
00
Z ? ' 0
\0.? \
j if
lie
Ss i /" ?j?, by ' 4 8 0 5 a 0
i 1, r \ ` Bj \
d
ISO
I 1
-Al
?, I I, I !r ? `? ?` _ .... ?4 \ ` `Ily ?a?^ \•?? \\ •??? -•.,,,wM ? i b'I?\ fly
•
,
?
0111
117
\
•? ? ti
`;\ \
47 D Ix
\ .il
'k
,
DOZ.
/ '04
j
d I, I 1
I
AIDQ
w '
........... u:,......
'Ise
\`- i '`•\ .. , ..Arlo.,......
Dl
i I
i ! \,
Yl W4 stag
•
I
j1' P' I ?\/ , ? I a , \` PSI x?'Y ?P ..? -
, 1 r
m
op,
,
,
w 1 O,
boo _... / '
TA-
i i
1
, I
j
?' I ! i !fit M.
,
n
.i Fy v .. Ium
.\?
9.19
p4
+ ,dy /
,
I/
r
A
II
,
..._... Deer .: ?? ?. ? ? ? ? , +? d N i? ?./ I /! ? ?•N i./
I
PPee ? '
n,
y
4
x

,
r _.
y . -
Preliminary Threatened and Endangered Species Survey
For
Breakaway
Madison County, North Carolina
April 27, 2006
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Clearwater Environmental Consultants, Inc. is pleased to provide the following report on our
preliminary protected species literature review for Phase 1 of Breakaway in Madison County,
North Carolina. The site ranges in elevation from 4,080 ft to 4,330 feet msl. The property is
accessed by Wolf Ridge Road. The property is surrounded by private property to the south and
east and Wolf Laurel Ski Resort to the north (Figure 1).
The preliminary threatened and endangered (T&E) literature review for the project site was
conducted to determine the occurrence of or the potential for existence of federally listed threatened
or endangered animal and plant species on the proposed site. Completion of this survey was
directed by and complies with three current state and federal regulations, Federal Endangered
Species Act of 1973 (16 USC 1531-1543) (ESA), North Carolina Endangered Species Act
(N.C.G.S. Sect. 113 article 25), and North Carolina Plant Protection and Conservation Act of
1979 (N.C.G.S. Sect. 19b 106: 202.12-22).
2.0 METHODOLOGY
A preliminary protected species audit was conducted in April 2006, on the site by Clearwater
Environmental Consultants, Inc., to determine the potential for occurrences of animal and plant
species listed threatened and endangered by current Federal or State regulations.
Database information from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) dated May 8, 2006
(attached), provided existing data concerning the presence or potential occurrence of threatened
or endangered species in Madison County, North Carolina. The USFWS lists the following three
federally threatened and endangered species as occurring or potentially occurring in Madison
County:
Madison County
Common Name Scientific Name Status
Gray Bat Myotis isencens Endangered
S tfin Chub Hybo sis monacha Threatened
Oyster Mussel Epioblasma ca saeformis Endangered
Bog Turtle* Clemmys muhlenbergii S/A

April 27, 2006
Page 2 of 5
The N.C. Natural Heritage Program records (attached) for the USGS Sams Gap topographic map
indicate no records or occurrences of the federally endangered plants or animals in this area.
3.0 FEDERALLY LISTED SPECIES AND ACKNOWLEDGED HABITATS
The following is a brief description of each listed species and its recognized habitat:
3.1 Spotfin chub, Federally - - - T
listed as a threatened species is a
small species growing to a; ,
maximum size of 92 millimeters' - v T 4
standard length. The body is } ?iF
elongate; the mouth inferior;
usually there is one pair of P z, }
minute, terminal labial barbells;
scales moderate to somewhat
small in size; a distinctive large
black spot is present in the caudal region. The spotfin chub is restricted to the
Tennessee River drainage where it once occurred widely in 12 tributary systems
distributed over five States. Presently, this species is known only from the lower
North Fork of the Holston River, Virginia and Tennessee; the Emory River System in
Cumberland, Fentress, and Morgan Counties, Tennessee; and the upper Little
Tennessee River, North Carolina. The spotfm chub inhabits moderate to large
streams, 15 to 70 meters average width, with a good current, clear water, and cool to
warm temperatures. These streams have pools frequently alternating with riffles. The
fish has been taken from a wide variety of substrates, although rarely, if ever, from
significantly silted substrates. The unnamed stream is not included in the Tennessee
River drainage, and is a small stream that is not suitable habitat for the Spotfm chub.
April 27, 2006
Page 3 of 5
3.2 Gray bat, Federally listed as an endangered species is the largest member of its
genus in the eastern United States, the gray bat weighs from 7 to 16 grams. Its
forearm ranges from 40 to 46 millimeters in length (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
1982). One feature that distinguishes this species from all other eastern bats is its un-
colored dorsal fur. The other bats have bi- or tri-colored fur on their backs. Also, the
gray bat's wing membrane connects to the foot at the ankle instead of at the base of
the first toe, as in other species of Myotis (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1982).
Populations are found mainly in Alabama, northern Arkansas, Kentucky, Missouri,
and Tennessee, but a few occur in northwestern Florida, western Georgia,
southwestern Kansas, south Indiana, south and southwestern Illinois, northeastern
Oklahoma, northeastern Mississippi, western Virginia, and possibly western North
Carolina. Gray bat colonies are restricted entirely to caves or cave-like habitats.
During summer the bats are highly selective
for caves providing specific temperature and
roost conditions. Usually these caves are all
located within a kilometer of a river or
reservoir. In winter they utilize only deep,
vertical caves having a temperature of 6-11
degrees Centigrade. Consequently, only small
proportions of the caves in any area are or can
be used regularly. There are nine known caves
that are believed to house roughly 95 percent
of the hibernating population. Banding studies
indicate the bats occupy a rather definite
summer range with relation to the roosting site
and nearby foraging areas over large streams
and reservoirs. Summer colonies show a
preference for caves not over 1.2 miles from
the feeding area. Caves were not found
therefore the site is unsuitable for the Gray bat.
3.3 Oyster mussel, Federally listed, as an endangered species inhabits medium-size
streams to large rivers on shoals and riffles in course sand/gravel/cobble substrate. It
is not associated with small stream habitats and does not extend far upstream in
tributaries. It prefers water depths of less than three feet and is sometimes found
associated with water-willow beds. The oyster
mussel is a small species (adults 50 - 70 mm) that
exhibits pronounced sexual dimorphism (male and
female shells differ in form). Shells are yellowish-
green with numerous narrow green rays and the
nacre is bluish-white to creamy in color. Male
shells are elliptical in shape while female shells
have a swollen posterior end, which is dark green
in color. The species has two lateral teeth in the
left valve and one lateral tooth in the right valve.
Two small pseudocardinal teeth are present in each valve. Historically, the oyster
April 27, 2006
j Page 4 of 5
mussel was one of the most widely distributed Cumberlandian mussel species. The
main stem Cumberland and Tennessee Rivers, as well as many tributaries harbored
this species. The species has been extirpated from much of its range and only a few
populations still exist in Cumberland River tributaries. The small creeks on-site are
not suitable habitat for this species.
3.4 Bog turtle, federally listed as a threatened species by similarity of
appearance with the northern bog
it N
turtle. Bog turtles are easily
distinguished from other turtles by
the large, conspicuous bright
orange, yellow or red blotch found
on each side of the head. Adult bog
turtle shells are 3 to 4-1/2 inches in
length and range in color from light
brown to ebony. Habitat would
include sunlit marshy meadows,
spring seepages, wet cow pastures,
and bogs. The preference would be
narrow, shallow, slow-moving rivulets. The southern population of the bog turtle,
ranging from southern Virginia to northern Georgia, is also protected with a
threatened designation because its physical appearance is similar to the northern
population. The southern bog turtle population is separated from the northern
population by approximately 250 miles. However, individual bog turtles in the
southern population closely resemble individuals in the northern bog turtle
population, causing difficulty in enforcing prohibitions protecting the northern
population. Therefore, the Service is designating the southern population as
"threatened (similarity of appearance)." This designation prohibits collecting
individual turtles from this population and bans interstate and international
commercial trade. It has no effect on land management activities of private
landowners in southern states where the bog turtle lives. Suitable habitat for this
species was not found. No impact to bog turtles is expected from this development.
4.0 EXISITNG SITE CONDITIONS
The site consists of the following four habitat types, wetlands seeps, small tributary
headwater stream, upland maple birch forest, and cleared areas.
4.1 Wetland Seep - These small areas have few canopy trees growing in the seeps.
However, adjacent upland tree vegetation does shade most of the sites. Other
species observed include sphagnum, Trillium sp., and may apple (Podophyllum
peltatum). Vines observed included Smilax sp and rubus sp.
April 27, 2006
Page 5 of 5
4.2 Upland Forest - This upland habitat is found on-site at the higher elevations and is
dominated by sugar maple (acer sacharrum), sweet birch (Betula lenta), and yellow
birch (Betula alleghaniensis). Other tree species include white ash (Fraxinus
americana), northern red oak (Quercus rubra), yellow buckeye (Aesculus octandra),
and striped maple (Acer pennsylvanicum) . Understory species observed include
white ash, northern red oak, fire cherry (Prunus pennsylvanica) and yellow buckeye.
Shrubs consisted of Mountain Laurel (Kalmia latifolia), and rhododendron
(Rhododendron maximum). Herbaceous plants observed include mayapple,
bloodroot (Sanguinaria canadensis) wild sarsaparilla Rattlesnake root (Prenanthes
sp.), jewel-weed (Impatiens capensis), and Indian cucumber root. Impact to this
habitat is not likely to affect listed species.
4.3 Cleared area - The proposed ski slope and roads were cleared under an existing
sediment and erosion control permit issued by the N.C. Division of Land
Resources. Most of this area is still under construction and has no natural
vegetative habitat features at this time.
4.4 Unnamed tributary - The unnamed tributary consists of a man-made channel
that was constructed in late winter of 2006. The banks have been matted and
stabilized but the stream bed is relatively new and disturbed.
5.0 FINDINGS
ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc., performed a comprehensive threatened and
endangered species survey, in the vicinity of proposed impact areas at Breakaway, Madison
Country N.C., in April 2006. Specifically the survey targeted listed federal species. No
protected species were identified on-site by personnel from Clearwater Environmental
Consultants, Inc. Therefore, it is the opinion of Clearwater Environmental that impacts to
protected species are not likely to occur as a result of this project.
6.0 Conclusion
During completion of threatened and endangered species habitat assessments for Breakaway, no
listed species were observed. It is the opinion of C1earWater Environmental Consultants, Inc. that
federally and state protected species are not likely to be present within the site. As such,
development of the proposed property is not likely to cause an adverse impact to any threatened or
endangered species.
Although no threatened and endangered species were identified during this survey, because of
the transitory nature of some of the listed threatened and endangered species and the particular
flower/fruiting periods of some plants, it is possible that endangered species populations and
locations may change over time. Therefore, any potential findings at a later date should be fully
investigated and coordinated with appropriate agencies to prevent potential adverse impacts.
Breakaway
Madison County,
North Carolina
CLFARWATFR
Environmental Consultants, Inc.
718 Oakland Street
Hendersonville, NC 28791
Vicinity Map
Figure 1
05/04/06
92.90.000' W WGS54112'29.000' W
1 51
t )( 0?ti U??
-`?? i F J C l,1 7 O?
El
_- ? ? F? I'`? ??
1 ?
r sw9 ??? ? , ? r j k I / ,?? ? ?\ ; ? ? ` ? _ \??? N-? ? /- ? l Hwt'????.{ { ? ? i j ?` ??I . !- l / ? 1 / `,??.. ?.
?ASOUI?.A?/ r.a D ?, ?., ?{ n a Z) -
J1 1 /r 1 F l _
Project Site
JJ » Z, ?(? ,,? 3 I, L l v
5 ??"`?ac? ? ? (.ao?? L ??-. ,.?'? lam/' f` r? , ?? ?`? I ?? .J ? • ??'o?, .'?aY? i
I )PI
CX\
?_-.??? i^~'?. ,l'?1?'. -i?l?!? i?t.?y ? r -?7 ? ; ?,,I? ??;?F?•"? /. ,-4o/-.?I,r (9 yt'.? ?1? 1
( ,? z ? r n 1<- u1Di
a' --' lea
1 ??? ` *bl _ 1 ? ? ( ? J; I I 1 ? '1 = J ~? ? ) ??? -? S i ? G J Y 1 C ?\- t v
2;.??? t ?1ti ? -,)_,?l )?11'???il lt'\ ?`,1.C},1 ?1.?? ???•?l`.
"',kd / F i?(r? J 1 `'\J \ ff V g `, ^ `/J? ?1 Vf 41 % -a \ ` e_{` ??
A 7Y
r( l > g; ]"(1=
Z ?> >"? 'fi fir( lid y
1Ff
I /? ??, i'` I [ t \I
?,y,/ _,L Jib V J}1 ?'•. S 1 e) J
l <1
z s ? 4 I rJ ? - wJ .:,r?m'r'h?V A c l ? l Fr G ( ?J
-J 7
J:f
92.33.000' W 92°32.000' W 92.31.000' W 112.30.000' w WG 92°29.000' W
r ??9i a morme
?ye?a.?tueowemx.e?o? 1...++e.b??apo)
j CLEAR 1 I ATM
Breakaway Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Madison County, 718 Oakland Street USGS Sams Gap Topographic Map
Hendersonville, NC 28791 Figure 2
North Carolina
828-698-9800
Madison County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern, an... Pagel of 2
Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of
Concern, and Candidate Species,
Madison County, North Carolina
Updated: 04-27-2006
Common Name
Vertebrate:
Bog turtle
Eastern small-footed bat
Gray bat
Hellbender
Lake sturgeon
Mountain blotched chub
Northern saw-whet owl
(Southern Appalachian
population)
Olive darter
Paddlefish
Rafinesque's big-eared bat
Southern Appalachian eastern
woodrat
Spotfin chub (=turqoise shiner)
wounded darter
Invertebrate:
French Broad crayfish
Oyster mussel
Sculptured supercoil
Vascular Plant:
Butternut
Scientific name
Clemmys muhlenbergii
Myotis leibii
Myotis grisescens
Cryptobranchus alleganiensis
Acipenser fulvescens
Erimystax insignis eristigma
Aegolius acadicus pop. I
Federal Record Status
Status
T (S/A) Probable/potential
FSC Current
E Current
FSC Current
FSC Historic
FSC Obscure
FSC Current
Percina squamata FSC Historic
Polyodon spathula FSC Historic
Corynorhinus rafinesquii FSC Historic
Neotoma floridana haematoreia FSC Current
Erimonax monachus T
Etheostoma vulneratum FSC
Cambarus reburrus FSC
Epioblasma capsaeformis E
Paravitrea ternaria FSC
Juglans cinerea
FSC
Historic
Historic
Current
Historic
Current
Current
http://nc-es.fws.gov/es/cntylist/madison.html S/Ri?nnA
Madison County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern, an... Page 2 of 2
Cuthbert turtlehead Chelone cuthbertii FSC Current
Darlington's spurge Euphorbia purpurea FSC Current
Gray's saxifrage Saxifraga caroliniana FSC Current
Mountain Thaspium Thaspium pinnatifidum FSC Current
Mountain catchfly Silene ovata FSC Current
Piratebush Buckleya distichophylla FSC Current
NonvascuIar plant:
Definitions of Federal Status Codes:
E endangered. A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
T'= threatened. A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range."
P = proposed. A taxon proposed for official listing as endangered or threatened.
C = candidate. A taxon under consideration for official listing for which there is sufficient information
to support listing. (Formerly "C1" candidate species.)
FSC = federal species of concern. A species under consideration for listing, for which there is
insufficient information to support listing at this time. These species may or may not be listed in the
future, and many of these species were formerly recognized as "C2" candidate species.
TOM = threatened due to similarity of appearance. A species that is threatened due to similarity of
appearance with other rare species and is listed for its protection. These species are not biologically
endangered or threatened and are not subject to Section 7 consultation.
EXP = experimental population. A taxon listed as experimental (either essential or nonessential).
Experimental, nonessential populations of endangered species (e.g., red wolf) are treated as threatened
species on public land, for consultation purposes, and as species proposed for listing on private land.
Definitions of "Record Status" qualifiers:
Current - the species has been observed in the county within the last 50 years.
Historic - the species was last observed in the county more than 50 years ago.
Obscure - the date and/or location of observation is uncertain.
Incidental/migrant - the species was observed outside of its normal range or habitat.
Probable/potential - the species is considered likely to occur in this county based on the proximity of
known records (in adjacent counties), the presence of potentially suitable habitat, or both.
i
http://nc-es.fws.gov/es/cntylist/madison.html SIR19MA
NC NHP Quad Search
Page 1 of 1
NC NHP Quad Search Results
New Search
Returned Elements: 10 using: SAMS GAP
[Natural Community 4] [Vascular Plant 41 [Vertebrate Animal 2]
Major Scientific Name Common Name State Federal State Global
Group Status Status R
k
Quad -Status
Map -
. Natural an
Rank Habitat

Boulderfeld forest None None None
Community
S3 G3
Sams Gap-Current
Link
Natural High elevation red oak
Community forest None None None S5 G5 Sams Gap-Current Link
Natural Northern hardwood forest
Community (typic subtype) None None None S4 G5 Sams Gap-Current Link
Natural Rich cove forest None
Community None None
S4 G4
Sams Gap-Current
Link
Vascular Euphorbia purpurea Glade Spurge SR-T FSC
Plant S2 G3

Sams Gap-Current

Link
Vascular Hydrophyllum
Plant macrophyllum Largeleaf Waterleaf SR-P None S2 G5 Sams Gap-Current Link
Vascular Meehania cordata Meehania
Plant SR-P None
S2 G5
Sams Gap-Historic
Link
Vascular Silene ovata
Plant Mountain Catchfly SR-T FSC
S3 G3
Sams Gap-Current
Link
Vertebrate Northern Long-eared
Animal Myotis septentrionalis
SC None
S3 G4
M
yotis Sams Gap-Current Link
Animal rate Sylvilagus obscurus Appalachian Cottontail SR FSC S3 G4
Sams Gap-Current
Li
nk
NC NHP database updated on: Thursday, May 4th, 2006.
Search performed on Monday, 8 May 2006 @ 13:18:14 EDST
Explanation of Codes
http://207.4.179.38/nhp/quad.php c/QIIAAK
, n , .I ~ 1 Y• ~ ! ~ _ , o ~ .r v ~
~ i r ~a ~ ~ s+~ ~ ~ $ al'/ ~ Z l f~i:
, W / r l F.
_ i , r _ _ - ~ , ~ ~ , ~ ~ d, r
- 1, ~ r ~ i` Q E t
~ , . - ~ • ~ / J' - Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~
_ 7~ ~ ~ - i e 0 ~
„t~ i
y^~ 1 fl / ~ r
{ " ~ ~ ~ 1! ~ ;
m ~ - 'b ~ r ~ ~ ~jr1
,r' G... 1 _ ° ~ ,a ~ ~ ~ _ ~=e it ~ , i~ r R 1
MARS HILL ~ q. ~ ~ ~ t { ~ b ~ 4 ~ ,~9 J ~ ~r ~ ~ ~ Y " ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f R~
~ \ I~ ` ,f . r ~ (A ~ Z
` ¢ A~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ A , ' 1 ~ ~
.y ? ~ 4 ~ / x a ~ ° MARSHALL e ' ' 4 X, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , w, ~ S i p ~ ~ + ~ ~ ~ ~
~a i . ~ ~ , s i ~ r s s ~ l 99 C- R ~ i R m ~~,i ~ O
arn, r^+ , n ~ „e -md' l ~
~ ' 8 9, 4i $ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z r::
I O ~ (A
~ ~ I i ~
1 1 r y ~ P ~ , 1 ~ f~°r~` ~ ~ r ~ W f ~Fl r' ~
~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ - ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ UNTY MAP ~ , I50N CO MAD _ ~ ~ ~ ~ s r n'"''°r~
~ a ~ ,,I ' ~r ~ ~ NOt '~D $QA~ t ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ i r~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ Z ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r~.. ~ . .1 .c _ _ i _ ,a.
- ~ f r ~ ' ! d ~ ~ ~ <
' ~~B~~Afi~Al~L~~1D C0 ~~L.~.~., y ~J
~ ~ ~ i 1 # s : 254 e @ f f ~ ~ _ r"~ s r
• SO.ere~.~ ~ ~ ' ;~`~~r ~ ~ i' ~ i r _ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ,
fi [d ` ~ t ~x..,` ~ •
~ i`~ 1 i
~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ,
i 1 ~ , t ~ ~ i i. ~ I ~ Wig. -
~ { l _ t r ~ ~ { ~ I ~ ~ ~~w
i ~ i ~~1 ~ i i r x.
x _ ~ ~e ~ ~ ~ ' .i ~ - ~ ,
_ ~ t
% -w r- g ,
f ~ ~ , i
~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - 1 ~ . e 2 2 O
~ ~ _ - ~ ~ in O . ~ - w ~ ~ ~ _ ,
~ ti ~ ~ ~ ~ c - - x , _ ,
a ~ ` -a, ~ ~ ~ i V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - '4
~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ' ~ m1 ~ ~ ~
~ ~ `a, ~a~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ , ~ ` , _ _
e 4 ' r ~ - _ ~ ~ ~ v _ - _ 4 ~ _ ~ _ 9 ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ , -
~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ _ ~ 1 -
~ _ . t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . _ _ ~ ,
~ ' ~ ~ - ~,~F ~ is ~ e~,~_ _ ~ 1 - fir: A ' ~1 R. . ~ ~ ~ ~ ? t ~ ~ ~ ' b7, a ~ _ ~r L _ ~ ~ ~
~ r ~ f ~ t t. . ; , E ,
i ~ ~ ~ ~s-- ,f, ~ ~ ~ , _ ~ ~ ~.+r ~ - -
_ ~
1' ~ ' - ~ , r i _ ~ ~i
_.r ~ _ _ *t fit. ~ ~ 6 i ~ ~ _ \ ~ ~ ~ '1 % ~ ~ ~ - - r 4 I; ~ ~ , r.
j tt `7 w~ r ~ _ ~ _ , ,i \ 1/. - i•. / ! i _ ~ !~!1 !r,'! if 1I `r ~ ~ Q Q~

_ t ~ _ . ~ ~ t ~ ~ , \ ,%~wii ~ / t~ 6 E" ~ ~ Q-OIL L
1. c - ~ \ - ~ -
\ ~ y r - ~ \ ~ J,.--~ \ ~ ~e , _ is n ~ - ~ ~ r _ .'l;,/ice; ~ / / ; y r~ c0 c0
_ ~ r,_... ~ ~ ~ a , _ ~
-Y ~ 'V`im A ~1 _ -
v z #e ~ :,r _ / _ ,,i ~ ~ o ~ O 00 OD ~ - _ ~ <
~ ~ 1 i ~ ~ ~ ~ a - - ~ ~ / i - A ~ i , -~.y ~ ~ ~ ` ~ / !lam,. _ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ , ~ _ ~ € / ~ X W C m
J 1 1 1 J ~ O L _ -
l ~ . . ~ fy C
1 _ _ y+ ; f, , t..,Q
~ ~ ti 1 a~ - - - - . ~ ' - __.r._, , •
~ - ~S ~ , i. /
v _ ~ r ~ A ~l, ti ~ 't ` ~ I I, % ~ / '
_ _ k ~ ~ / K. / ~ ~ A \ r ?y \ I ~ i ~ Ate' i' 'r. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r
~ ~t ~ A-, ~ ~
' ! r r ~ l ,'1MBT ~ i~ 1 i Z
' •I ~9 ~1 ~ i , 1 ) - i \ % '
~ , ~ \ 1~ I,f r` ~ ~ ,1: ~ ~ 1 '~il
~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ' 1- nr -,,a._ - . _ ~ ~ - ~ -
~ n r ~9 • I ~ b ~ \ 1 0 I! l i. 1 _ ~ t ~ ~ 1 6 _ ~ - ti. ~ a a' - tit - - -
, r ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~i ~ . , ~ 1' . ~ ~ ~ O
~ ( X1,1 ~ ` , ~ ~ ;1 i ' ~ ~ ~~,.I~ ~ _ i
a ~ I' i ~ I;#~ r~ 6 o ~ 1' ; ~ ~ ? ~
,t~ j 1 ~ ~ t t ~ i ~i - - --__.i' ~ ~ t ' ~ ' ~ ` ~ r, ~ ~ 't r ii J
r ~ ~ - ~ k ~ i i ~ i Z ~ f 's _ LL ti _ - _
~ ~ * ~ f
~ I ~ _ - , ~ _ - ~ m
i ~ ~ ~ © ~ 'i ~ ~ t r s ~ r ~ '
~ ~ ~ try .1 ~.t ~ I ~ X11 tf 1 ( j~ ~r~ ~ l.._ _ ~ X
~ ~ ® \ ~~r J ~ ! ~,1' ~ 1 , 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 f ' ~ ~ , t~ ~ i ~ 1 ~ i ,1 ~ ~r I..~ +V ~r ~
~i , t'~ ' C'I I Q ~J.I ' r
~ i`, ~ ~ ~ i ~ f ~ t ~ i~ ~ r' I I " 1 ~~~.h / ~ ~ ~ r I
~ ~ rr(( ~ i
~ ~ ~ - ~ j i 'i a ; ~ i 1 ~ / I I ~ ~ i ~ ~ r"~ ~ ~ cc 1 , ~ ~ t J
# ~ { , ~ , ~ ~ ~ Q t ~ ~ r ~ ~ LLB
~ ~ s q ~ 1 ~ ~ W -J ~ ~a << , ~ ~
w~ ~'r ~ ~ , ~ ~ 1. ~ x `
r i ~sa ~ Q
`o ~ i r: ~ i ~ r... ~ /
o % I~" 1~ i J ~ 4 i ,ice / ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~~V ~ 1# ~ •
i ~ ,i ~ w ~ p ~ ~ti~ `r
r O d 9 _ ~ - 1 \ ~ J
I' ~ ~ ~ i ~ , ; A ~ ~ ,1,,'1 ~ O ti~ '1 ~ ? MAY <a O ~
v €c~ ~ 1 ~ / ~ i
~ ~ ~ 1 1 ~ I ~ / ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s '~EFIh Z O ( ~ r; i is, \ ~.C O Z
~ i~ ~ ';1 ~ ~ ~'a ~ i. ~ ~~Tf~A i r
r ~ _i f _t 1 ~ - ~ 1 1 N, C] Q S ~ ~ I 1 ~ r'',= / l ~ ~ ~ ~ Q OC
~ 1 1 ~ ~ , f ` l ;d ~ O ~ _ = is
~ 4 -j` ~ j ~ ~ 1 i) ~ i ~ ~ I ~ L I I, t ~
~ ~ , 1 ' l ~ i ' ~ i _ ~ i~ 1 i - .:rr~
~ ~ J/ F r i ~ ~ - ; ~ GRAPHIC SCALE
/ , , ; : f ~ ~ ~ _ - . - 1, I = ~ rn
j 150 o 75 150 aoo Leo ~4 t
I ri ~E Ln
°E 4a U N IN FEET 0
97 i 1 i s - 150 !t. s o inch _
4
pia

.t ~ y _ R:
~ ~ *xn w ' ~ ~F1 ,
q ~ f ~ i ~ 1 • ~ _ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ r4 .e ` ~n ~
t ~ r t ~ e \ W ~ ~~7<YTI 1 , ~ ~ Q
, ~ \ ~ 4 ~r._- O
i K~
t \ \ ~ _ 4 ~ ~ . i ~ r ,y- X07 ~g• - -~~......._..s_..,. _....~.........a.- - p~ /ry~~ ~pa~
i ~ ~ S n ~ ` ~ ~ ~ V " 9 V ' _ W L9"W C ~ may. ~ R , q Y .yA r. s 9~. _ _ 48.91 y iy o , ~ p l
e 1 V ~yq~ ~ 'F, t A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ti, ti ib _ - ` . e.~__--_.____.__.. _ . yT~r alt w ~ an__.._....___w__.--- -
`"T~.. y.

• ~ yylt ?y ~ . y y A. j - - r ~ ,
~ i ~ ~ 22g3. \
~ . ` ~ ~ ~ 'CIS \ _ ~ ~ ~ lti yy y~e r,
~ ` r _
t+°`~_ REMOVE: $EOIM~NT \ n y i s ~ f BASIN ANd ABI iZE ~ ~ _ . ~ ~ fA
m--- . ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~p ~ o? - t.~ ~ i j4 ~ I y 3 -
m ",.~d.... r-.. = ~ ~
_ ~ . v ~ - ~ _ L - y~ i- - _
~ - ~ . , ~ - E-.'"~ ; _~.m_ o
z ~ -f"---._„ i 1 y , ~ , ~ cn
1 _ ` e C,q ~ at,~3 ~ y~y vyy ~ -
_ ~ - ~ t ~ , _-_---4t~S- - t ~t,~ ~ ~ " ~ 1 \ R~10~ 00 y i ~ ~ s W
~f^ ,~o ~ . _ r , 4 ~ m 't w r , _ { t y
~ ~ ~ _ t ~ o . ~ v1 ~ _ _ ~1
. , ) Ra D MpAC L ~ 1
f ~ ~ i - r ~{._u__ yky _y~ \ psi z ~ ' ! i v
.2 x i w PROPO Ep d i a t `
~ ~ _ _ r, f ~ ~ ~ ~ - ,y _ ~ ~ ,
-.~e._ y 1 ~ ~~r w T ~ ' , x y I ,
4 n. - - ~ ,o _ r, 411 - - ; i
• 1• ~ 4 - ~ '`EXISTING LOGGING
R CULVERT. ~ ~ [ 4 ~r y~ ' yi 1 ~ ~ ~ l , / '
___4 ~ I:
~ / `r . rp y y
! ~ I ' cP ; • f WE'~.AND A \ ~ F ~ ~ '1 ~ ~ ~ PRO OBE ~ IMPA~ , ~ siREiw !
, ~ . $,I l - ~ t ~ , ~ , ~ ~ ~ NO IMPACT
~e._ , ~ r _ ',r¦ III rII ~ ! ~ ~ i t
_ ~ ; ~ t ~ 1 ~ ~ I t I _w ~.4~ ACRD I ~ ~ ~ ,
x, l ,t I - s , _ { ` ~ r ~ ~ J ~ ~ r "
~ ` ti - ~ r- _ i ' ~ III ! - ` ~ 1 • . > " r \ f ~s ~ ~ ~ ~ B ~ ~ ~ ~ p c0 t~- - ,
- t• _ , Imo, ,i . ~ - ~ ~ - _ ICI III O 'J , - N
~ } ,t I I ~ ~lal. III ~I ~ l _ r ~ ~e t ~ , V$ ` ~ j ~ t. ! ' 4 ~i i III ,III 1 ~ - ~ P 1 P 'CT ~ u s~ r- ~
i " (i~ ~ 1. i f ;:,i 4 ~.5 ••l it ~ f l~. ,rI ~II 1 r ~ ~ } } ~ _ r ~ ~ f ~ Q
~4 ~ ~ '/~pr~ I III 1~ II ~ s - ~ - _ ACE ~ ~ ~n. - ~ ~ ~
~ ' ~i ~ - ~ ? I i ti' _ ` ~ i _ *.r ~ i ~ jai' ,f• I? I. j ~ ~ ~ , f , ;
. • r ~r ~ - 1 ` / - ~ - - m as
_ _ ,r'. r I ~ • ' ~ ~ - t ; ~ , ~ . ' - c - 3 ~ i ,r a ~ - -
~ _ << _ ~ _ - ~ , . ~ . I' „ 3 . ~ ~ ~ ~ - r ' i / - ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ a~ v o i f . ~ m ~ ; ~ r ; ,
F / _ j! / F - - V . ~ .
• , " I , 1, r~ 1 i a / . ~ j / . ~ ,i ~ ~ ~ x . , a ; r 4 / /
c . . ~ - rte; J ; . t / j\ 1 . r~ ~ ~ , t ~ r -
PiQSED , . ~ : ` ~ r ~ r r i r. - _ ,
,1 - . ' . 0 y- ~ ; - ~ , , ,
, . - 5 ~ 1 ~ ~ / - ~ r HaD
/ . i _ ~ , r , _ _ _ fAN - ~ - - - ~ ~ ~
. r ~ _ ~ / , \ ~ 1 f - - OD / / ~ ~ ~ ~r O r
~ j r ~ - ~ , _ ~ it ~ - ' ~ QZ C r , ~ ~ JOr ~ / - _ ~ ' m , . ~ ~ , = O
f . ` ! r..• ;
\ ` / r ~ ~ ~ ~ f ' F i~ 1 ~ r , ~ ~ . i 1 ~ . . _ , i`~ ~ ~ ~ - / - z a ~n ~n v ' ~ - - ; = , , M
i ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ / Y r , - . ~ ~ y ~ , v - ' ~ ~ ~ . ~ ,
l1 ~ ~ ` ~ \ ` ~ , . " - C , ~,r, ~ ,r c0 ` l ~
r ~ ~ , r` r ~ r r` i ; ~ ~ ~ r . _ D t. ~ ` f ; ~ - ~ - ~ O .f - ? / ~ r I / 4Q Z
O o ; ~ , r _ xW U
~ ~ . p ~ - . , o ~ ~ V~ ~ i 1 i • ,t , ~ O X ~ . / , r ~ ,i.
. ~ j ~ \ J ~ ors r ~ f~ r y - ~ ~ ~ _ . ~F 5 n. . ,s ; / E a
1 ,
j, 1 ND E • ~ . • N43 r _ w ~ ~ . ~ ~ ,a , , p
_ i ~ p E ' ' ~ v ~ O.OO~ACR Q ~j - ~
t~- A ~ ~ / ~ v +m. - i ; / / ,r ~
_ . a,, ~ - ~ i r f f ~ - , - s - n _ / , f - , t
~ f ~ _ . s t~ ~ - / ` ~y J/ r ~ - '
t - . ,l r f , f f / ~ ~ , r/' Q " ,
~ i Z J ~ ~ r J
r a ` ~ t ~ _ ~ Y ~ - - ~ Q ~ ,
ti ~ ~ ~ _ -A_ - i r
! ~ ~ ; . a r i 1 ` _ ' r' - f f'r ( I / f F ~ / . r r ~ 1 I- - - , /
_ - ~ H 1 ! ; , ,
\ • o ~ , i ~ ~ ~ l' ` ~ ~ - _ ~ , f O Z f - ,
~ ; " ~ f ! ~
o l r I , J , ' ~ , i / ,i ~ -
- i ,t . i ~ ~ M r
~ r y \ f r ~ \ ! f E+ ~ s r - J ~ ~
r ~ \ ~ \ - ~ _ _ , , t ~ i,
t i d ` • .y 1 ' ~ ~ t r`` O r" ' r' ,1 / 3 " , ~ ~ ,
~ ~ - , ~ ~ `y 1~ Cl ~ _ ~ . ~ s ~ ~ ~ r' ~ 1! r
i ~ u r 1, ~ ~ 1; ~ ~ ~ '
- ~`p t e~ - , . „s ~ ~ r • . , . , , l ~ i ; , + l ~ . (r o as_ so.- ~ 100 .a1so ~ " NOTE: DESIGNATED STREAf~~ . X ` j E
~ . \ + f r ! ~ CVO. 1 IS A DEVELOPER _ ~ W f ! r. Q "
i ~ ~ - ~ v, ,v. . , , i1 ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ! ' CONSTRUCTED DRAINAGE ~ ~ i ; ~ ~ ; ` ` DITCH WHICH HAS BEErI - Z
~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ , ~ , : ~ , 't r + 1 ~ F6BP ~ + f ( 1 ~ ' ~ CLASSIFIED AS A STREAM. , , _ Q
! i+ ~ 1 ~ \ i f 50
a a - ` a ~ ` ~ , i , r :r,- W LL ~ ! / ~
~ ' L , r C ~ , ~ ~ W LEGEND ~
i _ ~ , . ~ 5,\ ~ ~ ~ i ~ I I . i r i ~ r i _ / f ~ ~ LL
o i eµ .o , , ~ z r p - ~ r ! 1 f ~ ~ _ 4
~ ~ r.. ~ , , ~ - 1 1 t ~ i r~ f' _ . - r ~ ' Q % ~ ~ ~ BREAKAWAY PHASE 1 PROJECT AREA 48.5 ACRES ~ ~ f ~ ~ J
r ~ ` r 4 ;~.b
~ ~ t ~ ' ' ` \ + LL
, e M1 / I -.~-.1....- F ~ ~l 1 ; l l . ,TOTAL WETLANDS AREA 0.16 ACRES_
( ~ ~ ~ ti ;,r~ ~ ! f,,r , r `l . ( _ d ~ , ` I ~ ~ , ~ \ ~ z w ~ ~ ~I ~ ~
_ r , `i ' i ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ TOTAL STREAM LENGTH 1941 L.F. t ii~~ f U I- U
' t ~ ' ~ _ \ a,
~ ;,rt ~ - it A ti ` ~ i i t ~ ~ f' .WETLAND IMPACTS: O z =r ~ ~ 3 ~
t e - , ~ ` ~ ~ i iEX15'Ta1~LpGG , PROPOSED IMPACTS. p Q Q ~
~ ~ y t , ~ ~ t ~ ~ t10A~ti CUL j ILIETLAND A (SKI SLOPEa 0.040 ACRES ~ o 1 i ~ ~ ~ 1AIETLAND 'B' O.OSO ACRES
t , ~i \ , e~ ~ _ I t ~ ~ i , : , . ~ , ~ ~ 4 ~ - r ' : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - . ~ r" ~ 1 WETLAND 'F 0.005 ACRES
al t V ~ ~ i i I. ~ ':1~ ~ } i it _ v , '1 \ • i , TOTAL PROPOSED 1AIETL.AND IMPACTS..... 0.095 ACRES - r
E ~ _ - ,
r! ~ ! ~ t . a ww~w~. /'1rl
1 t~ i \ 0
, vp,_}~ _ 'n ~i J
, , t IMPACTS 299 L.F. o ° PROPOSED STi~AM z _ t 1 z L J
i ; WETLANDS AVOIDED 0.065 ACRES
STREAMS AVOIDED.. 1642 L F
t -All