20060744 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20060503

W A r?;qQG
WDU
p e._ ? -I
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of WaterQuality
December 1, 2006
Mr. Greg Mitchell and Ms. Patricia Roche
Zephyr Outlook, LLC
38058 Daughtery Lane
Zephyrhills, Florida 33540
Subject Property: Outlook Ridge
River Hill Road, Murphy
DWQ Project # 06-0744
Cherokee County
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Mitchell & Mrs. Roche:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed
below, to place fill within or otherwise impact 137 linear feet of streams by culvert, 595
linear feet of streams by flooding, and 1172 linear feet of streams by restoration for the
purpose of property development at the subject properties, as described within your
application received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on October 23, 2006
along with information provided by your consultant via phone on November 14, 2006.
After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by
General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3402 & 3495 (GC3402 & GC3495). The
Certification (s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 13, 27, & 39 when issued by the
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). In addition, you should obtain or otherwise
comply with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with
your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, Non-discharge,
and stormwater regulations. Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed
impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall
expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose that you described in your application. If you change
your, project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application.
If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and
approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total fills
for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of
stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506
(h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are: p 156-C-5,1 12 r---
Do
1.SS
DEC 7 2006 One
NorthCarolina .
401 Wetlands Certification Unit DENR WATER NatmrallJ
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 KMANDS AND ST QUALITY
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 OR;rfWATER BRANCH
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] Internet: http://h2o.enr.state. nc_us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Outlook Ridge
Page 2 of 8
December 1, 2006
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific
and general conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met.
No other impacts are approved including incidental impacts:
Impact Number Amount
( Approved (Units) Plan Location or Reference
Stream - 1 ( 261 (feet) UT to Baine Branch
Stream - 2 j 62 feet UT to Baine Branch
Stream - 6 ( 65 (feet) UT to Baine Branch
Stream - 7 334 (feet) UT to Baine Branch
Stream -10 10 (feet) UT to Baine Branch
Restoration
Segment ; Amount
Approved (Units) Plan Location or Reference
i Stream - 3 ( 295 (feet) UT to Baine Branch
Stream - 4 1 70 (feet) UT to Baine Branch
Stream - 5 617 (feet) UT to Baine Branch
Stream -11 190 (feet) UT to Baine Branch
All restoration work must begin within 30 days of receipt of this approval, and be
completed prior to any residence associated with this development if occupied.
it
2. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all
specifications governing the proper design, installation and operation and
maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to protect surface
waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be
designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning
and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and
erosion control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the
requirements specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on
all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including
contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be
designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most
recent version of the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
Outlook Ridge
PagO of 8
December 1, 2006
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the
reclamation in accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation
Pollution Control Act.
3. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian
areas beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction
Notification. All construction activities, including the design, installation, operation,
and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices,
shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes,
or rules occur.
4. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters
to the maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control
devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the
natural grade restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land
Resources has released the project.
5. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification
or applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is
required to return the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit,
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC,
27699-1650.
6. Diffuse Flow
All constructed stormwater conveyance outlets shall be directed and maintained
as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through the protected stream buffers
such that it will not re-concentrate before discharging into a stream. If this is not
possible, it may be necessary to provide stormwater facilities that are considered
to remove nitrogen. This may require additional approval from this Office.
7. Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction
corridor within these boundaries approved under this authorization shall be
clearly marked with orange warning fencing (or similar high visibility material) for
the areas that have been approved to infringe within the buffer, wetland or water
prior to any land disturbing activities.
Outlook Ridge
Page 4 of 8
December 1, 2006
8. Turbidity Standard
The turbidity standard of 50 NTUs (Nephelometric Turbidity Units) shall not be
exceeded as described in 15 A NCAC 2B. .0200. Appropriate sediment and
erosion control practices must be used to meet this standard. Continuous
monitoring by onsite, calibrated, continuous recording, equipment must be
performed both upstream and downstream of any instream work. The
results of this monitoring must be submitted along with the below required
stability monitoring. Additionally, should the results indicate a violation of the
turbidity standard, all work shall cease until such a point the measures are
implemented to protect surface waters form further violations.
9. Stability Monitoring
The Permittee shall examine the stabilization work done under this Certification on
an annual basis for three (3) years following the completion of the restoration
efforts. This field evaluation should note the condition and stability of the
measures installed and how well the repair is holding up. A written report must be
provided to DWQ's Asheville Regional Office by June 15t of each year. The report
must describe inspection results, include digital photographs, list the date of
inspection, and describe any needed repairs or corrections.
10. Construction Stormwater Permit NCG010000
Upon the approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan issued by the
Division of Land Resources (DLR) or a DLR delegated local erosion and
sedimentation control program, an NPDES General stormwater permit
(NCG010000) administered by DWQ is automatically issued to the project. This
General Permit allows stormwater to be discharged during land disturbing
construction activities as stipulated by conditions in the permit. If your project is
covered by this permit [applicable to construction projects that disturb one (1) or
more acres], full compliance with permit conditions including the sedimentation
control plan, self-monitoring, record keeping and reporting requirements are
required. A copy of this permit and monitoring report forms may be found at
http.-Ah2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/Forms Documents.htm.
11. Deed Restrictions
Deed restrictions or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained
jurisdictional wetlands, waters and protective buffers in order to assure
compliance for future wetland, water and buffer impact. These mechanisms shall
be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or buffers approved
for impact under this Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate.
Outlook Ridge
Page 5 of 8
December I, 2006
12. Temporary Fills
All temporary fill and culverts shall be removed and the impacted area returned
to the original grade, including each stream's original cross sectional dimensions,
planform pattern, and longitudinal bed and bed profile after construction is
complete or within 6 months of the establishment of the crossing, which ever is
sooner, and the various sites shall be stabilized with natural woody vegetation
(except for the maintenance areas of permanent utility crossings) and restored to
prevent erosion. If the crossings are not completely removed and restored as
described above within the specified time above, additional written approval from
this Office must be obtained to modify this condition.
13. Culvert Installation
Culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the
original stream profiles are not altered. Existing stream dimensions (including the
cross section dimensions, pattern, and longitudinal profile) must be maintained
above and below locations of each culvert. Culverts shall be designed and
installed to allow for aquatic life movement as well as to prevent head cutting of the
streams. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched, the appropriate
stream grade shall be re-established or, if the pipes installed in a perched manner,
the pipes shall be removed and re-installed correctly.
Culvert(s) shall not be installed in such a manner that will cause aggradation or
erosion of the stream up or down stream of the culvert(s). Existing stream
dimensions (including the cross section dimensions, pattern and longitudinal
profile) shall be maintained above and below locations of each culvert. Therefore,
you must provide plans with adequate details that indicate that the current stability
of the stream will be maintained or enhanced. You must receive written approval
from this Office for the above plans before the culvert(s) is installed. Culvert(s)
must be installed according to approved plans.
The establishment of native, woody vegetation and other soft stream bank
stabilization techniques must be used where practicable instead of rip rap or
other bank hardening methods. If rip-rap is necessary, it shall not be placed in
the stream bed, unless specifically approved by the Division of Water Quality.
Outlook Ridge
Page G of 8
December 1, 2006
14. Riparian Zone Replanting
Replanting of vegetation within disturbed areas located within 25 feet of the
streambank associated with any land disturbing activity, repair, replacement and/or
maintenance must be done in a manner consistent with the Guidelines for Riparian
Buffer Restoration immediately following construction. (Please see attached.)
This 25 buffer, as agreed to in your application and through further discussion with
your consultant, shall be undisturbed, native, woody vegetation, with the exception
of a 3 foot wide, wood chip mulched walking path, and the buffer shall be maintained
through out all water courses in the development except on the dams themselves.
15.To minimize temperature elevation in waters downstream, trees should be
maintained along the pond perimeters, but not on the dams. Native trees (e.g., river
birch, sycamore, red maple) should be planted along the pond if trees are removed
or if additional shading of the pond surface is needed. Also, the outflow pipe must
be designed to draw water from near the bottom of the pond. Cold water intakes
should be within 1-2 feet of the bottom, but not on the bottom. This design will
improve water quality in the pond. The easiest way to accomplish a near-bottom
outflow is to place a larger pipe (i.e. shroud) over the standpipe so that water flows
up through the bottom of the larger pipe (see inset).
pond surface
outfl water inflow
pond bottom
When filling in-line ponds, residual flow in the streams below the dams must be
maintained to protect aquatic life. This can be accomplished by partially opening the
gate valve during the filling process. However, turbid water should not be
discharged. Until the water in the pond is clear, flexible pipe should be used to
maintain any stream flow, if applicable, around the pond.
16. In stream construction and disturbance shall be prohibited within 25 feet of the top of
banks except where authorized work will occur.
17.Culverts that are less than 48 inches in diameter should be installed with 20% of the
diameter of the culvert placed below the level of the stream bottom to allow the
accumulation of stream bed materials and to facilitate aquatic life passage during
periods of low stream flow. Larger diameter culverts should be placed 1 foot below
the stream bottom. Culverts should be placed in the main flow channel (i.e.
thalweg). Partial burial of culverts in this manner also may require increasing their
size to accommodate flow requirements.
18. If concrete is used during construction (e.g., headwalls), a dry work area must be
maintained to prevent direct contact between curing concrete and stream water.
Water that inadvertently contacts live concrete should not be discharged to surface
waters due to the potential for water chemistry change and a fish kill.
Outlook Ridge
Page 7 of 8
December 1, 2006
19. Rock, sand, or other materials should not be dredged from the stream channels
except in the immediate vicinity of the crossings. Instream dredging has severe
effects on aquatic life and disturbance of the natural form of the channel can cause
downstream erosion problems. The natural dimension, pattern, and profile of the
channels adjacent to the crossings should not be modified by widening or changing
their depths.
20. Sandbags, flexible pipe, or other diversion structures should be used to avoid
excavation in flowing water. Materials used for flow diversions should be removed
from the stream bed after completing the construction work. Any diversion channels
must be lined with fabric and/or rock.
21. Storm water from roads should be directed to vegetated buffer areas (e.g. level
spreaders) or retention basins and not routed directly to streams. Drop inlets on
streams must not be constructed.
22.Any riprap placed for inlet or outlet stabilization should be clean and limited to the
stream bank below the high water mark and vegetation should be used above. Rip
rap must not be placed in stream channels in a manner that obstructs fish passage.
23. All crossings should be constructed as close to perpendicular to the stream channels
as possible to minimize stream and buffer disturbance. Road and utility alignments
should be set-back as far as possible from stream channels to minimize
sedimentation and buffer disturbance.
24. Riparian vegetation, especially trees and shrubs, should be preserved as much as
possible. Native woody vegetation (e.g., rhododendron, dog hobble, silky dogwood,
sycamore, river birch, red maple) should be reestablished upstream and
downstream of the stream crossings if it is removed during construction to provide
bank stability and shading. We encourage the use of native plants that must be
removed from permanently disturbed areas.
25.All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters should be inspected and
maintained regularly to prevent contamination of stream waters from fuels,
lubricants, hydraulic fluids or other toxic materials.
26. Discharging hydroseed mixtures and washing out hydroseeders and other
equipment in or adjacent to surface waters is prohibited.
27. The remaining lengths of streams and riparian areas on the tract should be
protected in either their existing or improved state (i.e. with native vegetation
reestablished where absent) in perpetuity from fill, vegetation removal, and other
forms of disturbance with deed restrictions or similar instrument. A riparian buffer
width of 25 feet is minimally consistent with the "trout buffer rule", but wider buffers
are recommended to provide more water quality and habitat functions.
28. All jurisdictional waters on the site shall be inspected weekly for stability (longitudinal
profile, cross sectional dimension, and pattern) and a monthly report submitted to
the Asheville Regional Office within 15 days of the end of each month.
29. Bottomless Culverts must span from high bank to high bank. The digging of footers
which change the flow of the stream, or otherwise impact the natural course on the
stream are prohibited.
Outlook Ridge
Page S of 8
December 1, 2006
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification
and may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your
proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application and
as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA
Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the
approved wetland or stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You
must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing,
send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,
N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you
ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of
the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Mr. Kevin Barnett in
the DWQ Asheville Regional Office at 828-296-4657.
Sincerely,
-?PAlan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
AW K/khb
Enclosures: GC 3495
Certificate of Completion
Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration
cc: Jennifer Robertson, Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc.
Post Office Box 882
Canton, NC 28716
Amy Chapman, 401 Permitting Unit, Central Office
David Baker, USACE Asheville Regulatory Field Office
David McHenry, Wildlife Resources Commission
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 06-0744.OutlookRidge.Approval
Triage Check List
?FV 1
?` 4
, ? .,
1
Date: 10/20/06
Kevin Barnett, Asheville Regional Office
To:
60-day Processing Time: 10/17/06 to 12/15/06
From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone: [phone]
Project Name: Outlook Ridge
DWQ #:06-0744
County: Cherokee
The file attached is being forwarded to you for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks!
i
Wetland and Natural Resource
Consultants, Inc.
-?`'F. ?i• :jam o
Date: October 16, 2006
r a
To: David Baker, Kevin Barnett
From: Jennifer Robertson
Re: Surveyed Map for Outlook Ridge
Kevin - you had requested a surveyed map of the entire property at a scale of 1" _
50' in your most recent additional information request letter. The surveyor for
Outlook Ridge uses a dos-based program to generate maps and indicated to me that
he could not print at that small of a scale. I could not accept digital versions of his
files to import into CAD either. Included is a surveyed map showing the entire parcel
with jurisdictional areas at a scale of 1" = 100'. We have highlighted the
jurisdictional areas on the map with a thicker marker. Please accept this scale due
to the limitations of the small surveying company.
M?
Canton Office Newton Office
PO Box 882 wnrinc.com PO Box 224
Canton, NC 28716 Newton, NC 28658
828-648-8801 828-465-3035
828-648-8802 Fax [phone] Fax

_L0 :?.
Wetland and Natural Resource i.-T??'-•
Consultants, Inc.
October 12, 2006
Mr. David Baker
U5 Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Mr. Kevin Barnett
NC Division of Water Quality
2090 U5 Highway 70
5wannanoa, North Carolina 28878
Re: Zephyr Outlook, LLC
Outlook Ridge
Cherokee County, North Carolina
DWQ Project # 06-0744
Dave and Kevin:
gt;:?adg D
f?
QG1 1 Z 2006
v,tE RMSTORMTSe +
Please reference the office meeting conducted on October 11, 2006 regarding the
development of the Outlook Ridge residential community. The project proposes a
residential development on approximately 100 acres off River Hill Road west of Murphy,
North Carolina. This document and attachments includes all previously submitted material
and supplemental information, requested at the referenced meeting.
• Restrictive Covenants will be placed on all remaining, unimpacted streams and
wetlands on the property. These covenants will restrict land use and activities
within 25 feet of the left and right top of bank.
• A conceptual pattern for the reestablished stream can be seen on the restoration
map and "Typical Meandering Channel" diagram. A conceptual longitudinal profile
based on existing topographical lines and the projected pattern has also been
enclosed. These plans are conceptual in nature as site specific plans can not be
developed until the pond is drained and the old channel is no longer impounded. All
conceptual plans have been included in the Restoration Plan document.
• To drain the pond, the developer has heeded recommendations by the resource
agencies and obtained plans for a pond skimmer. Several small skimmers will be
used to draw surface water f rom the pond, slowly lowering the water elevation.
Canton Office Newton Office
PO Box 882 wnrinc.com PO Box 224
Canton, NC 28716 Newton, NC 28658
828-648-8801 828-465-3035
828-648-8802 Fax [phone] Fax
Wx^
• The stream segment above Pond 2 will be temporarily sandbagged and pipe around
the pond bottom. A row of silt fences will be placed perpendicular to the flow of
water at the pipe outlet to ensure that sediment is not carried and deposited
downstream.
• A detailed monitoring plan and success criteria has been included in the October 12,
2006 Restoration Plan for review.
Should you have any questions regarding the attached information, please do not hesitate
to contact me at 828-712-9205.
Best regards,
po--
Jenni er Robertson
Enclosures:
Project Summary Sheet
PCN Cover Letter dated 9/29/06
Pre-Construction Notification dated 9/29/06
Impact Map
Appraisal Forms
Impact Summary Sheet
Stream Restoration Plan dated 10/12/06
Restoration Plan Map
Skimmer Detail
Typical Meandering Channel Diagram
Conceptual Longitudinal Profile
Stream Reference Data
Recommended Native Plant Species
"Should you not receive the above attachments with this correspondence,
please contact us immediately so that we may provide this supplemental
information."
cc: NCDWQ - Raleigh (4 copies)
Smith Moore Law - Mona O'Bryant
Zephyr Outlook, LLC - Greg Mitchell
Canton Office Newton Office
PO Box 882 wnrinc.com PO Box 224
Canton, NC 28716 Newton, NC 28658
828-648-8801 828-465-3035
828-648-8802 Fax [phone] Fax
,.w
Project Summary Sheet for the Corps
Owner/Applicant
Name:
Mailing Address:
Phone Number:
Mr. Greg Mitchell
Zephyr Outlook, LLC
38058 Daughtery Road
Zephyrhills, Florida 33540
813-505-7483
Street Address of Project: River Hill Road
Nearest Waterway: Baine Branch and UTs
River Basin: Hiwassee River Basin
Nearest Ci : Murphy
County: Cherokee County
Decimal Degree Coordinate Location of Project Site: 35.092400 N
84.153373 W
USGS Quadrangle Name: Fanner
Wetland and Natural Resource
Consultants, Inc.
mow': rih: X.i ?..
September 29, 2006
Mr. David Baker
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801
Mr. Kevin Barnett
NC Division of Water Quality
2090 US Highway 70
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Re: Zephyr Outlook, LLC/Outlook Ridge
Cherokee County, North Carolina
DWQ# NOV-2006-CV-0003
Dear Mr. Baker and Mr. Barnett:
The attached Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) is being submitted on behalf of
Zephyr Outlook, LLC (Zephyr). On March 27, 2006, Zephyr received a Notice of
Violation (NOV) from the NCDWQ for the construction of a permanent road
crossing and amenity ponds without permit authorization. Mr. Mitchell is seeking
after-the-fact Nationwide 39 permit authorization and any 401 Water Quality
Certifications associated with this project.
Impacts on site include dam fill and flooding for Ponds 1 and 4. Additionally, the
developer has installed a rock wall separating the segment of stream associated
with the Pond 3 restoration and Pond 4. This rock wall is acting as grade control
and is needed to prevent head-cutting. Since the stream within Pond 3 has been
recently reestablished a grade control structure will help stabilize the stream until
vegetation has established itself. Impacts associated with the rock wall are
minimal, totaling approximately 10 linear feet. The stream segment that is flowing
through the Pond 3 area has been partially restored. Further restoration
activities include the installation of additional riparian vegetation. The area will be
temporarily seeded with an appropriate cool season grass, such as winter wheat,
until permanent woody vegetation can be planted in the spring.
Canton Office Newton Office
PO Box 882 wnrinc.com PO Box 224
Canton, NC 28716 Newton, NC 28658
828-648-8801 828-465-3035
828-648-8802 Fax [phone] Fax
Impacts have been reduced onsite through the elimination of Pond 2, Pond 3, and
removal of associated dam fill. The stream segment through Pond 3 has been
partially restored and Pond 2 is going to be drained and prepared for restoration in
the upcoming weeks. Upon completion of the drainage, approximately 70 linear
feet of fill associated with the dam will be removed and the channel through the
bottom of Pond 2 will be restored (see attached restoration plan). Once
restoration is underway, the area surrounding the restoration will be evaluated for
the potential installation of riparian wetlands. A 25-foot buffer will be planted
along the stream segment and the entire disturbed area will be planted with native
grasses to ensure soil stability until woody vegetation can be planted. Additionally,
the Pond 4 boundary will be configured to limit flooding impacts associated with
the impoundment to a total 334 linear feet; a 45 linear feet reduction. The
elimination of Ponds 2 and 3; and new measurement of Pond 4 will minimize impacts
by 0.032 acres of wetland seeps and 682 linear feet of stream channel. The
remaining 2427 linear feet of streams and 0.584 acres of wetlands on the property
will be preserved for use as mitigation credit. A 25-foot vegetated buffer will
remain or be established along both sides of all stream segments. Where possible,
a limited disturbance, 25-foot pond buffer will be preserved around the two ponds.
Pond buffers will add additional acreage to preservation areas on site. In addition
to the restoration on site, hand removal of downstream sediments will occur.
Approximately 620 linear feet of stream below Pond 2 and 190 linear feet of
stream below Pond 4 will be hand cleared of sediment. Sediment will also be
removed from-the wetland below Pond 4. It was brought to the developer's
attention that a sediment basin adjacent to the Pond 2 dam was not functioning
properly. This basin will be cleaned out and stabilized immediately to ensure it is
functionality. All sediments removed from the streams, wetlands, and basins will
be hauled off site or used for upland lot fill.
DWQ has requested additional justification for the ponds proposed at the Outlook
Ridge development. Zephyr's real estate and marketing team has indicated that.
buyers are requesting more out of developers. Where lots and views have sufficed
in the past, new potential buyers want multiple facilities within a planned
community. In order to be competitive, developers are meeting demands with
communities based around central amenities. The attached appraisal from
Certified Appraiser E. DeWayne Hogsed of Hometown Appraisal in Murphy
Ccn -n Cffce Newton Office
PO Box 882 wnrinc.com PO Box 224
Canton, NC 28716 Newton, NC 28658
828-6.;8,,801 828-465-3035
S23-648-8,802 Fax [phone] Fox
A11116
indicates a $26,000 difference in value between pond-front lots and creek-front
lots. Based on the pond-front lots lost with the removal of Ponds 2 and 3, this
equates to a loss of $150,000 for the frontage lots alone. This difference in price
is compounded by the absorption rate, additional financing and marketing costs,
and a loss of revenue associated with lots that have views of these amenities.
Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions regarding the
attached PCN and supplemental information.
Best regards,
M+??
Jennifer Robertson
Enclosures:
Project Summary Sheet for the Corps
PCN
Impact Summary Sheet
Restoration Plan
Plant List
Restoration Data
Pro ject/Impact Map
**Should you not receive the above attachments with this correspondence,
please contact us immediately so that we may provide this supplemental
information.**
cc: Cyndi Karoly - NCDWQ Raleigh (5 copies)
Canton Office
PO Box 882 wnrinc.com
Canton, NC 28716
828-648-8801
828-648-8802 Fax 3
Newton Office
PO Box 224
Newton, NC 28658
828-465-3035
828-465-3050 Fax
AAL
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USAGE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NW 13/27/39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required., check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
R
Owner/Applicant Information OCT 1 7 294
Name: Zephyr Outlook, LLC; Attn: Greg Mitchell
Mailing Address: 38058 Dau hte Road p W •^., °
Zephyrhills FL 33540 - -
Telephone Number: 813-505-7483 Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jennifer Robertson
Company Affiliation: Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants
Mailing Address: Post Office Box 882
Canton North Carolina 28716
Telephone Number: 828-648-8801 Fax Number: 828-648-8802
E-mail Address: wnrinckaol.com
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 1 of 9
.k?
M. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towms, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Outlook Ridge
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 452500534371000
4. Location
County: Cherokee Nearest Town: Murphy
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Outlook Ridge
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Murphy take 64
West to 294 North following 294 North approximately 10 miles to River Hill Road, turn
riaht onto River Hill Road and Outlook Ridge is approximately 3 miles on the left.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.092400 °N 84.153373 °W
6. Property size (acres): T/- 100 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT Baine Branch
8. River Basin: Hiwassee
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at hgp://b2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is primarily undeveloped Several roads have been
installed and the construction of two ponds have been completed and one other pond is under
construction. Existing land use in the vicinity is residential and agricultural.
11; C 05
r
Page 2 of 9
AML
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project includes the development of a residential community, including
jurisdictional road crossing and two amenity ponds. The project will also include the removal
of a dam and subsequent stream restoration, hand removal of sediment downstream of Ponds
2 and 4; and installation of a grade control structure above Pond 4. Sediment will also be
removed from the wetland below Pond 4. Standard construction and earth-moving
equipment will be utilized in the construction.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The project purpose is to provide residential
housing and amenities to a rural area of Cherokee County, to restore a currently impounded
stream to its pre-impoundment condition, and to remove accumulated sediments from stream
and wetland features.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. DWQ issued NOV-2006-CV-0003 on March 27, 2006 for violation of
NC water quality standards. An Individual Permit application was submitted to the Agencies in
April 2006. At request of the Corps this application was withdrawn and a Nationwide Permit
application was submitted in June 2006.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
There are no future permits anticipated for the project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Updated 11/12005
Page 3 of 9
Ab.
NVetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Impacts to streams are associated with one road crossing. two dams and associated flooding,
and restoration of the channel impounded by Pond 2. See attached Impact Summary Sheet.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
I Located within Distance to Area of
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland
100-year
Nearest
Impact
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, Floodplain Stream (acres)
j (indicate on map)' herbaceous, bog, etc.) (yes/no) (linear feet)
j 8 Flooding (Pond 4) i Forested N adj 0.0083
9 i Flooding (Pond 4) Forested N adj 0.0104
C 12 Sed. Removal ( Forested N adj 0.1601
13 ! Road Crossing
- Forested N adj 0.0028
e lacement
Replacement
1 Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.1816
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: >1 ac
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
i (indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
1 UT Baine Br Flooding (Pond 1) I P 1 261 0.0060
M 2 UT Baine Br Dam (Pond 1) P 1 62 0.0014
3 I UT Baine Br Restore (Pond 2) P 2 295 0.0135
4 UT Baine Br j Restore (Pond 2) P 2 70 0.0032
5 UT Baine Br j Sed. Removal (2) P 1 617 0.0142
6 UT Baine Br j Dam (Pond 4) j P 1.5 65 0.0022
7 UT Baine Br ; Flooding (Pond 4) P 1.5 334 0.0115
10 1 UT Baine Br j Grade Control (4) P 1 10 <0.0001
I 1 r UT Baine Br ; Sed. Removal (4) P 1 190 0.0043
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 1904 0.0563
L'p:a:e3 : Z lr?1D?
Page 4 of 9

5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the proiect:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.0563
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.1816
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.2379
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 1904
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation - SEE TABLE
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:-
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
trout pond,
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 9

were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
ZenhN-r Outlook received misinformation before beginning this project. The company was
unaware of the rules and regulations governing theproperty and began construction of four
ponds on the project site Since becoming aware of its error and the applicable requirements,
Zeph-,T has avoided or Proposes to avoid impacts through the elimination of Pond 2 and 3; and
the elimination of two road crossings Pond 4 will flood 45 linear feet less than originally
reported The road crossing provided by the Pond 2 dam will be replaced with a bridge or
manning structure All remaining jurisdictional areas on site will be contained within common
open space Ponds are needed on the property to boost revenue and attract potential buyers to a
very rural area of the County Attached to this application is an appraisal done by Certified
Appraiser E DeWavne Hoesed of Hometown Appraisal showing the difference between lots that
are pond-front and lots that are creek-front
VIII. 'Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
httD:/Ih'-)o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/sirmizide.htnil.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if oitsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
u p3 111I;:r'05
Page 6 of 9
AL
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
SEE COVER LETTER
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/M/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein',
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
Updated 11/112005
Page 7 of 9
Alhk
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If `--es', identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
j Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 ( 1.5
Total
Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
«-ithin 15A NN CAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
storm,%vater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Impervious area within the development will not
exceed 20%. Stormwater will be passed_ through grassed swales and sediment basins before
entering streams All un-impacted streams on the property have been put into common open
space with a minimum 25-foot buffer.
XH. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sewage will be treated via on-site wastewater systems• each homesite will receive potable
water from a single-familv well.
X M. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
YesM No?
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ® No ?
C'Fc :tea 11;1 ?GO?
Page 8 of 9
Alk
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h'o.enr.state.nc.us/newetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
This is a small residential development in close proximity to Murphy, North Carolina. Murphy
will be able to provide residences with necessga goods and services. No additional
development will occur as a result of the development of Outlook Ridge.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

,pplicaUt/Agent's Signature Date
signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 9

Impact Summary Sheet
Site Numhpr Feature Tune of Imnart Imnart I_Pnnth/Area Assnrfated NW
1 Stream Flooding Pond 1 261 If 39
2 Stream Dam Pond 1 62 If 39
3 Stream Restoration of Flooded Area Pond 2 295 If 13/27
4 Stream Restoration of Dam Pond 2 70 If 13/27
5 Stream Sediment Removal Below Pond 2 617 If 13/27
6 Stream Dam Pond 4 65 If 39
7 Stream Flooding Pond 4 334 If 39
8 Wetland Flooding Pond 4 0.0083 ac 39
9 Wetland Flooding Pond 4 0.0104 ac 39
10 Stream Grade Control Pond 4 10 If 39
11 Stream Sediment Removal Below Pond 4 190 If 13/27
12 Wetland Sediment Removal Below Pond 4 0.1601 ac 13/27
13 Stream Road Crossing Replacement 0.0028 ac 39
Totals
Tvne of Imnart Tntal Stream Lennth Tntal Wetland Area Assnciated NW
Dam 127 If 0 39
Flooding 595 If 0.0187 ac 39
Sediment Removal 807 If 0.1601 ac 13/27
Road Crossing 0 0.0028 ac 39
Grade Control 10 If 0 39
Restoration 365 If 0 13/27
Totals 1904 If 0.1816 ac
Total impacts for NW 39 732 If 0.0215 ac
Total Impacts for NW 13127 1172 If 0.1601 ac
Pond Creation Table
# To be created In: Method Purpose Land Use Size of Watershed Expected Surface Area
A& 09/21/2006 12:37 18284944363 OUTLOOK RIDGE PRJMGR PAGE 04
IFile No. Zephyr 9/1 ?(Q61 Pace #7?
LAND APPRAISAL REPORT Summary
C6 r1„ 7.... 0/101nr.
Borrower Zephw Outlook, LLC. Census Tract 37-039-999 Map Reference 4525
Property Address Outlook Rrd a Lot 37
Cby . Murpi?r. _ ._?.... County Cherokee State N.C Zip Code 28906
Legal Description See attached legal desuiption,
Sae P6w S N/A Die of Sae . NIA Lawn Thum N/A yrs. Properly Nhb Appralsed Lx] Fee ? LcasftW ? De Mjrtkds MID
Actual Real Estate Tams $WA _ bbl Lou charges to be paid by seller a N/A Odw sales corcessions N/A
Lettder/Cient BP T ok LLC. „` Address
Occupant-Vacant Appraiser E._Oe, a e Hogsed Ir&utUars to AppralsaTo determine the estimated market value of the,
sub'ed prop" as of the effective date of this report.
Location Urban ? Suburban © Rural Good Avg, fair Poor
Suit UP ? Over 75% 25% to 75% i 1 Under 25% Employment Stability ?_ 1 ?v ? ?
Growth Rate CJ Fully Derv. r? Rapid '.^,I steady I I Slow Convenience to EnVoymard f l ICJ ! I
Property Values ? Increasing stable Oeckrk% Corrvenierce to Shopping n n r i
Detnar Guppy [J Shortage in Balanpe 1J PDly Convenience to Schools U Li L
Markepreg Tune L] Under 3 Mos. J 4-8 Mos. tiS Over a Mos. Adequacy of Pubic Traraportad ion U L i _j E
60% 1 Famlly 2% 2.4 Family 3% Apts. 3% Condo, _0% Commercial Recreational Facilities El N ? 01
Present Land Use
_
7%industriai 25%Vacart % Adequacy of Utilities n ? n n
-
i 1 Likely (`} ? Taking Place (`} Property Compatibility 71 tJ
changein Preset j.; ;'Use ® Not LA*
(') From To Protection from Oebkftertal Cgrrdidvns u u ?
Predomkrant Occupancy ® Owner n Tenant 3 % Vacard Poke and Fire Projection ? E L r1
Single family Price Flange S 35,000 _ to $555, 000 Predominant Value $ 169, 000 General Appearance Of Properties ? i- r.
Single Family Age New yrs. to 50, yrs. PredornmartAge, _ .__.,..T yrs. Appeal to Mares ? ® ? Ell
Corrmwnts including those factors, favorable or unfavorable, affecting marketability (e.g. pubic parks, schools, view, nolse):Adeguacy_ of Public Transportation rated as,
oor because there is only Dublc school bus available for public Transportation. This does not adversty affect value because com _ n_q,..
-P p
properties have same optioris.

s Comer Lot
re
Dimensions See attached Deed for surveytaus = 84 Sq. FI, erAc
Ir
?
Zoning dmill atlon No Zoning See Deed Restrictions Present Improvements Ay der L7 do not conform to zoning regridlons
Highest and best use ®Preserd use ? 00r!. (spendy)
public ONbI (Desaft) f OFF SITE IMPROVEMENTS Topo Slopping „
Eec. ? 1SaarAccess ?Public EProrate Size-S4 Acres+f-
Gas Surface Gravel I Shape Irregular
Water (J Mynt+x> Mc ? Pubic ?J Prir& View CreekfronUMountarn
San. Sewer r] Stone Sewer ? Curb/Guller Drainage Appears Adegwte
j I Underground Elect & Tel. Sldewatn I Street Lights the property located in s HUD IdeKtied Special Food Hazard Ann? No I I Yee
Comments (favorable or unfavorable Incloding any apparent adverse easemens, erxraactonads, or other adverse conditions): The subject has no advese conditions noted at
time of inspection. Easments are limited to road and ubT right-of ways, These easements are common for the area and does not affectthe
marketabililty of the sub'ect roe .An Appraiser is not an enviromerttal ex ert thererore the soil condition is unknown. If soil condition is a
concernit is recommended that soil testing be conducted an enviromental en other than an appraiser.
The undesigned has recited three recent sales of properties mast similar and prWmate to subject and has considered these in the market an*sls. The description includes a dollar
adlustrrxnt reflecting market reaction to those sems of significant variation between tie subjsd and comparable properties. It a sigMikant item in the caraerable property is superior
to or more favorable dean the su*4 property, a minus (-) adlusunent is «mde ueus remOng tie rnWcated vmue of sugect It a signrtirant Rom In the comparable Is Inferior to or less
favorable than the subject property, a plus (+) adjusidnerd is made thus increasing the Indicated value of the subjwL
RH4 SUBJECT PRt>PET COMPARABLE NO. I COMPARABLE NO_2„ _ COMPARABLE NO.3
Ad&ess Outlook Ri dge Lot 37 tiangwv Dog Slerta Springs Lot 46 Sierra Springs Lot 45
M N C 28906 Mu h NC 28906 Murphy, NC 28906 Munohv NC 28906
Protd to Subled

Saies price

NIA

72 000
-
ylk
---
71,000

S 74 000

Price r she ai
At , 72,000
,
_ - ; rq 71 1700
As 74.000
Data Source Insp acted 09/19!06 Deed Book 1198 Pace 51 Deed Book 1210 Pa a 766 Deed Book 1208 Pane 813
Dada of Sale and DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION. _ ±LS?d# DESCRIPTION + - S DESCRIPTION + - S Ad %t
Tin Adjustment ,.
NIA 12/072005 0 031092006 0 01131x1006 0
LoeA4 Cherokee Cors'+ty,. Cherokee Cowdy : -.. 0 Cherokee County _ 0 Cherokee C_ Ounty , -.9
__
SWVIeW Creekiront I
-8000
Creekho su erior Creekfront 0 Creektront _ 0
Act 1.02 Acres +!_ .
i
_.57 Acre +f- 0 1,25 Acres +/- 0 1.29 Acres.+!- 0.
Acce
s Av 0
Avers a Averse Average 0
s
F e g
Creek ,_
0
Creek Creek 0 Creek 0
A aisesRat Ze 9119106 _
Moerchen/Frarrz 0 Timber/Cootware 0
- J- Timberwoo/Winston; _ 0
Saes or Financing NIA Conventional J D 0
Conventional Conventional 0
Concessions None None 0 None 0 None _ 0
~
Net Adj. rrc"h I + "?' 8000 ' . + . '
, t+
..

Value 1
.. r rr'`..
4
'
000
S 74
E !?: , $
64,000
1:.
S 71,000
,
Comments an Market Oats: The Sales Comp arison ,Technique considered. a nu mber of competing properties in th e area. The most similar
properties were c hosen to derive a comp arative market value.

ts and Conditions of Appra? This is a Restricted Ap>i re sal report for the exclusive use of the stated client. _
conciliation: The market d a reflection of_ buers and sellers in the market ace and is considered the most re!llsble
[
tor of value.
&Te YHE MARKET YA [As eF Sto be $ 65,

w o steed Did i ,1 Did Nat Physically lnsped Property
rot[ 16iew Appraise t a
Aralser(s
(vzK] Stalesaf
TAIL. for Windows' appraisoj al suftwuotiware by a fa mode, inc. -1-eao-ALAMODE
low 09/21/2006 12:37 18284944363 OUTLOOK RIDGE PRJMGR PAGE 05
LAND APPRAISAL REPORT Fll A9.9ophyrW19I06LEage_#8
MARKET DATA ANALYSIS
Summary
F p hbm ]anhv QHQICA
ITEM SUBJECT PROPERLY COMPARABLE NO. 4 COMPARABLE NO, 5 COMPARABLE N0. 6
Addr as Outlook Ridge Lot 37
Murphy, NC 28906 Daisy Lane
Murphy NC 28906 Sugar Maple: Road
Murp NC 28906 Davis Creek Road Lot 2
Murphy NC 28906
ft?V
-
Sales Price
$ NIA
-
n . W,1=11
S
88 000
't -;)I
74.501-i
60 000
Price per sb
Data Source $ - _
Inspected 09119106 1z1T+i::S. "' $ 68,000
Deed Book 1235 Pa a 239 . - 2ti 01" $ 74,500
Deed Book 1234 Pace 410 $
MLS # 100650 80,000
Die of sale and DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION + - Ad ust DESCRIPTION + - Adint.
d us1.
DESCRIPTION 1+(-)$A
Time Ad shrxnt
Location . „`
SbA%w NIA
Cherokee County ., _
Creekfront _
O6I16I2o06
Cherokee County
Creekfront 0
0
0 4811312008.
Cherokee County
Creekfront 0
0
0 Sale Pendir ,
Cherokee Courlty, .,
Creekfront A0.
0
0
Actwge
Access 1.02 Acres +/-
Average ? 1.75 Acres +1- _
Average -10,950
0 1, 86 Aue6 +/- .
Avera e . -12,600
0 ,51 Acre +t_
Avera e 0
0
hz
b Crook Creek 0 Creek _ 0 Creek 0
-
ors Ref # zepbt? 9119/08 Cherokee/DleNendet: 0 wrttin Hill 0 DB 740 PG 102 0
Sales of Firming
ConaeEione N/A
None Comerrbonal
None 0
0 Conventional
None 0
0 NIA
N/A
T_- 0
0
Nd Ad . + - 10 950 F", + t t 12.600 1
+ -
trtdie?ed V"
Of S? ect

I
M

: ..
I

5 ,050

1f lki
M01

1 sao e

$

o 000
Commerb: Come6 was added to show Listing of Creekfront Lots THIS IS A PENDING SALE !

StakuD Appraisal
Form LND.(C) -'TOTAL for Windows' appraisal software by a la mode, Inc. -1-60O-ALAMODE
A00 09/21/2006 12:37 18284944363 OUTLOOK RIDGE PRJMGR PAGE 06
HleNo Zepl?i rs119i0f1 Pade+M7
LAND APPRAISAL REPORT Summary
File No Ze h 9/19/06
Botrmm ZAPhyr.0utIook ,LLC. Cmus Tract 37-039-99 Map ft-iee 4525
Property Address Outlook Rime lot 53.-_ _._
C6y Murnhrv County Cherokee State NC Zlp Code 28906
Legal Oescriptiort See attached legal desrn __, -

.
Sate Pike S N/A D* of sale NIA , ,Loan Term NIA yrs. Property Rlgtds Appraised Fee Leasehold I . 109
1vArdrttfs P1?'
Actual Real Estate Taxes $ N/A (yr) L
oan charges to be paid by seller $ NIA OHrer sales coxessions wA
l.e,der/C{IefR Zephy[,0udook, LLC. Addntss
Occupant Vacarrt _ _ AppraiserE. Dewayng. M_o_gsed Instructions to Appraiser7o determine the estimated market value of the
"led Property as of the eQec Live date of this re ort
Lotalion thban U Suburban QC] Rural Good Avg. Fair Poor
suit Up Over 75% , 25% to 75% Under 25% EmpluywA Stablgly [] ? ? ?
Growth Rafe ? fidly Dev. ? Rapid FJ Steady [) Slow Convenience to Ernpbyaers ? ®? ?
Property Vakies ? i creasim Z stable U Declining Corrverhkrce to Slopping ? ? ?
Oarmnusupply ? Shortage V-1 In Balance Oversupply Convenience toSctals J Z 1-1
Matketltq Thee ? Under 3 Mos. [.. } 4.6 Mos. ? Over 6 Mos, Adequacy ct Public Trampodatton U 0 ? []
PlesedLand Use 80%1Famiy 2%24Farniy 3%Apts..,,_3%Condo,. 0%Commercial RecreabonfalFacilities
?
7%Indusbid
25%Vacwt % _ Adequacy ofLOtIs F G ?
Change In Present Land Uss 0 Not Ulaly ? LlWy (*) [1 Taking Place (') Properly CornpatibiW)r
? ®[] ?
_
(') From To Protection from DetiNsuRal Conditions u z ? ?
Predominart Occupancy Owner ( Tenant 3 % YacaN Police and Fee Protection [J
Skhgle Fainly Price Range $ 3_
. 5 D00.... 1o S, 555,000_ _ Pmdominal4 Value $ 189,000 General Appearance of Properties 0 0 ? ?
Skgk Family Age New yrs. to 50 yrs. Pr odorninart Age 7 yrs. Appeal to Market 0 x U U
Commends including those factors, favorable or unfavorable, affecting marketability (e.g. public parks, schools, view, noise):Ade ua of Public Transportation rated as
or because there is on public school bus available for public transportation, This does not adversly affettvalue because oom etin
o eniies have same OP-02 .
Dimensions See attached Deed for survey calls = 1.02 Sq. Ft or Acros [ 1 comer tot
Zoning ciassiflcaflm No Zoning See Deed Restrictions ., Present Impiovemets '?,:,Jdo ? do notcoformto mneg regulatlons
Nighast and best use ® Present use Q Otlher (specify) _ _
Pubk DOW (Describe) ( OFF SITE IMPROVEMENTS Tope Slopping _
Elec. ? Street Access ? Pubge Z Pfivadnf i Sae- 1.02 Acres
. - iShapelrregular -!
Gas ? Surface Gravel
_
Water ? Makttertarrce ?7 Pubic ?x Pt 99 View Pondfront/Mountain
san. Sewer ? ? storm Sewer ? Curb/GuUer Drainage Appears Adequate

Yes
(] Underground Sect. B Tel. Sidewalk..... _... Street LgMs I k the property located in a HUD klentpkd Special Flood Hazard Ana? ? No L7
r4mnwts (favorable or unfavorable including any apparent adverse easements, encroacrurems, or other adverse conditions): The subject has no advese conditions noted at
time of inspectlon. Easments are Grafted to road and utility right-of ways. These easements are common for the area and does not effect the
marketability of the subject ro erty,An Appraiser is tan enviromental expert therefore the soil contrition is unknown. If soil condition is a
concern It Is recommended that soil testis be conducted an enviromentai a art other than an appraiser.
The undersigned has redted three recall sales of properties most similar and prmdmate V subject and has considered these In the market analysts. The descrWon Includes a dollar
adjusorant reflecting markd nacdon to those items of significant variation between the saject and comparable properties. It a significant hem in the cwwrabw property is superior
to or more tavoraole than the sublea property, a minus; (-) adjustment is made thus reducing the indicated value of subject it a signlftcaM item in me comparahle is Inferior to or less
favorable Gran the subject property, a plus (+) adptstnlent Is made this increasing the indicated value of the subject-
ITEFA SUB,ECT PROPERTY COMPARABLE NO ;i . •_ . ,_, COMPARABLE N01 - COiw?PAiiABLE N0.3 -_-
Add= Oudook Ridge Lot 53 Mountain Wood Drive Mountain Wood Drive Gurilowel Amy
_ Murphy, NC 28906 Murph?.NC 28908 IuurPt!Y? NC 28908 Murphy NC 28906_
t Sub'
Plo
_._ -
Saks Price NIA 100,000 - + x. S 82 000 75 000
Price per site $ s,,.i31 "i E $ 100,000 -N-'j J$ 82,000 $ 75,000
Data Source in ected 09119/06 Deed Book 1200 Page 718 Deed Book 1188 P e 876 Deed Book 1155 Page 101
Gale of Salle and DESCRIPTION DE9CRIPTION + - A ' DESCRIPTION + 1 Adjust D I +(-)I
Ttne Adjusts tt ,
NIA 12120/2005 0 10/242005 0 05/05/2005 +3750
Coteries Cherokee County _ C_harokee_Coun_ty 0 Cherokee County _ •_ ____- 0 Cherokee Cwt rr 0
IeW Pondfront Pondfront
0 0
Pondfront Pondfrout _?.0
Acreage 1.02 Acres tl =_ _- _
-97 Acre +1- .... ;. 0 .
1.00 Acre +1- 0 .53 Acre ± I N *i 5,000,
.
Access Aver a _._^ 0
Average Averse 0 Averse 0
Pond _
Pond _ 0 Pond 0 Pond 0
Appraisers Ref 0 Ze hyr 9/19106 JohnsorVAdams . 0 SticwBuder 0 Marrewlez/Parrdo 0
Sales or Financing NIA Conventional 0 Conventional 0 Conventional 0
Coneesstons None None 0 None 0 None 0
,18 750
inNcated Vale tt 4 f
ri 0
'
h
?
019 W
1

_ "
1
82 000 93750
< tlr. 100 aao
}5 •S •? •• L-
of Sobpct
-
Comment; on Market Data The Sales Comparison TeChnitLue Considered a number of competing properties in the area. The most similar
properties were chosen to derive a coot arative market value. _•_-__-_,- _____

Comments and CotdttlCrs Appraisal This is a Restricted Appraisal report for the exci-, a use of the stated client.
Final Retbnciiiation: The market d a retlectien of till errs and seders in the marketplace and is considered the most reliable
indicator of value,
0
i EsrUUtE y„E pysesoff vA GPEMN AS OF _ September 19 2006 to be $ 91,000
• N
+
E. Dews a Hoased $ P • ti ____ i_I Did J Did Not Physically inspect Property
I
' -
tt appI I..
Appraisers FAtE • iew A a:
PK) Stakup Appraisal
TAL for Window9" appraisal software by a la made, int. -1-800-ALAMODE
A@1W 09/21/2006 12:37 18284944363 OUTLOOK RIDGE PRJMGR PAGE 08
LAnu A?f'p'pitANCAOL sAlr W"m -
MARKIET DATA ANALYSIS sumMary
file No. Zephyr9119106
ITEM SUB ECT PROPERTY _ COMPARABLE NO,44 COMPARABLE NO. 5 COMPARABLE NO. 6
Address Outlook Ridge Lot 53 OuBook Ridge Lot 26 Mountain Oak Reserve Lot 7 Gurbarrell Alley
Muter h NC 28406 Murphy NC 28908 _ Murphy NC 26906 . Murphy, NC, 28906 ,_
PmdmlN to SaEiect ^"
Daps of sO and SCRIPTION utbLn?ri
05/031200& 0
Future Sale
0
Fuhxe sale 0
Time Ad uI s MLO .
Location NIA
Cherokee County
L ?
Cherokee County ,
_. _
0 •ounty T
Cherokeb C, ,__ . ~ 0 Cherokee County
dBo ?0
0
-
S' iew -
Pondfroat Pondfront 0 Pondfront 0 Pm
nt
Acreage . _ ..
1.02 Acres +l- 1.46 AGte&/-. _0 2.36 Acres +l- 0 _53 Acre +1- .... _ ; . .. _. Q
Access _
Avera a Avera d 0 Average 0 Average
T
-
d
P Pond 0 Pond 0 Pond _0
e
Fto
A sers Rd * __
on
Z 9/19/06 _
Zephyr/Shaker
_ 0
fDB 1187 PG 126
0 OB 1155 PG 10,_'_r'
0
0
Sales or Podneirg N/A Conventional 0 NIA 0 NIA
I
Concassiom
NUJ (T t None None 0 NIA
+
? r?( 0 N
A
+
Indicated Vakm t,isrn?

`
i n,

^ 134 900
k 7(??
' 3 90 000 L= 120 ,000
Of Subect
Comments Comp 6 & e was added to sho ,
w Listin of Pondfront Lots. TIiESE Are LISTING ONLY!
Sialcup Appraisal
Form LND.(AC) -'TOTAL for Windows' appraisal software by a la =de, inc. -1-800-ALAMODE

The developer of Outlook Ridge, Mr. Greg Mitchell, proposes this restoration plan
to restore approximately 365 linear feet of an unnamed tributary to Baine Branch
upstream of an existing dam. The plan, as outlined within this document, serves as
guidance for the proposed restoration.
Restoration will be:
• drawdown water surface of Pond 2
• removal of the dam and outfall structures
• allow channel to flow freely through pond bottom
• install floodplain bench
• sow pond bottom with appropriate winter species to stabilize
• creation of aquatic habitat using boulders and large woody debris
• installation of topsoil
• planting of stream banks and riparian buffers with permanent vegetation
Project oversight will be provided by WNR staff to ensure proper techniques and
success; and to propose modifications during the construction process, if necessary.
Construction Plan and Specifications
The restoration process will begin with draining the pond and removing the dam and
outfall structure. The pond will be drained using a Faircloth Skimmer (detail
enclosed) that will allow water to leave the pond slowly and at non-erosive
velocities. Once the pond has been drained, the stream will be temporarily
sandbagged and piped around the pond bottom. This will be necessary for the pond
bottom to dry out enough for equipment to begin restoration activities. A silt
fence will be placed perpendicular to the flow of water at the outlet of the pipe to
ensure that sediment is not deposited into the downstream reach. Once it is safe
for equipment to move through the old pond bottom, all fill associated with the dam
will be removed. After the dam is removed, the stream will be allowed to take its
natural course through the pond bottom. A small floodplain bench will be installed
along the entire length of the channel. Dimensions for the floodplain bench will be
based upon measurements taken on the stream below the dam; the measurements
and the associated graphs have been attached to this report. The bench will then
be graded upward at a slope of 2:1 or flatter to match the existing grade at the
site. Natural rock and large woody debris harvested on-site will be used to restore
aquatic habitat in the stream channel. The entire pond bottom will be sowed with
and appropriate cool season grass, such as winter wheat.
WA
Sediment Removal
Sediment will be removed from approximately 807 linear feet of stream and 0.1601
acres of wetlands. Sediment will be hand cleared via manual labor. Sediment will be
removed to a depth that reveals the natural channel bed material or wetland
substrate. All sediment removed will be hauled off site or used as upland lot fill.
Planting Plan
In the spring, focus will be moved to the restoration of the stream banks. Topsoil
harvested on-site will be added to the stream banks at a minimum depth of six
inches. In an effort to keep the system as natural as possible and to prevent any
excess nutrient runoff into the stream, no soil amendments, such as fertilizer, will
be added. The slopes will be planted with appropriate riparian species from an
approved list (attached) to recreate the natural buffers which occur on site.
Buffers will be planted at a width of no less than 25 feet.
During other construction, some permanent vegetation will be harvested from site
with similar slopes and aspects to ensure suitability. To minimize damage and
ensure survivability, this vegetation will be carefully excavated and prepared for
transport. Six to eight tree and shrub species will be chosen and planted on 20
foot centers, resulting in 108 stems per acre. Large trees will be anchored into the
ground as necessary. Species harvested on site will be supplemented with nursery
stock to provide additional species richness and diversity. Tree shelters may be
used to accelerate growth and increase survivability.
Contractors will assure percolation of all planting beds and pits prior to installation.
Once planted, the specimens shall appear healthy with no leaf spots, leaf damage,
leaf discoloration, chlorosis, leaf wilting or curling, or evidence of insects on leaves
or stems.
The objective will be to mimic the natural buffers that occur on site, which are
comprised mainly of trees and shrubs. However, millet, or an equivalent annual
grass, will be used initially as a temporary cover crop to aid with soil stabilization.
Timetable for Restoration
Restoration of the channel will occur in several phases due to the time of year.
The pond drawdown, dam removal, installation of the floodplain bench, initial
stabilization activities, and sediment removal will begin this fall. The following
timetable is presented for the work listed above. Ranges are given below to allow
for rain days and other unexpected delays.
:?t
• 1-3 months to drain pond and remove dam
• 1 month to restore channel and construct floodplain bench
• 1 week to do initial stabilization
• 2-3 weeks for sediment removal
In the spring, riparian areas and buffers will be established. The following
timetable is presented for the work listed above. Ranges are given below to allow
for rain days and other unexpected delays.
• 2 weeks to harvest on-site materials
• 2-3 weeks to install vegetation
Monitoring
Construction of mitigation sites will be completed within one year of permit
issuance. Within 90 days of construction completion, WNR staff will provide the
resource agencies with photos of each site and a baseline monitoring report. A
monitoring report with photos will be submitted twice-annually for 5 years. WNR
will conduct monitoring and Zephyr Outlook, LLC will provide the financial assurance
that will ensure this project is complete and successful. An as-built report will be
included with the first annual monitoring report.
Success will be measured in terms of plant survivability, channel stability, and
utilization of the area by terrestrial and aquatic species. The stream will be
monitored for a time period that consists of at least two bankfull events or 5
years. Vegetation will be monitored for 5 years.
Photographic Reference Sites
Longitudinal and lateral photos will be taken at the site. These photos will indicate
aggradation, degradation, and/or bank erosion. If none exists, no remedial action
will be required. If aggradation, degradation, and/or bank erosion occurs, the
problem will be accessed and remedial actions will be planned, approved, and
implemented.
Plant Survival
Plant success will be measured in terms of percent survival. Plant survival and
growth of at least 320 stems/acre through year 3, 288 stems/acre in year 4, and
260 stems/acre in year 5 will be considered successful. Areas of less than 75%
coverage will be re-seeded and/or fertilized; and live stakes and bare rooted trees

will be planted to achieve the desired densities. Exotic, invasive, and invader
species will be hand cleared and will not exceed 20% of the vegetative composition.
Channel Stability
Channel stability will be measured through cross-sections, longitudinal profiles, and
pebble counts; and then compared to previous measurements. Two permanent
cross-sections, one at a riffle and one at a pool, will be established at the
restoration sites. If there is substantial evidence of instability, such as down-
cutting, erosion, or agradation, remedial actions will be planned, approved, and
implemented.
Biological Indicators
Biological success will be measured in terms of invertebrate populations. If
population measurements remain the same or improve, and species composition
indicates a positive trend, then the project will be deemed a biological success. If
population measurements show otherwise, reasons for failure will be evaluated and
remedial action will be planned, approved, and implemented.
f
t
Skimmer Details
r-- "C° Enclosure
- Water Entry Unit
PVC End Cap PVC Elbow
r ?rn -;
I
`illI;- -- PVC End Cap
PVC Tee PVC Pipe
1.2" Holes in
Underside
Flexible
Hose
PVC Vent Pipe
Schedule 40
PVC Pipe
Water Surface r F n , n ?.
Imo- Ll
i
Schedule 40 r5
PJC Pipe Orifice
` PVC Tee Plate
a
Bottom Surface
END VIEW FRONT VIEW SKIMMER
Oc6. 8j Yi. F;?IdMh
11k111.6::'N.K.td.
Dalb: ??1r 17. 1C+P7
PERSPECTIVE VIEW

Typical Meandering Channel
Point
fool bar
??. • d d u? L _ • yr
4C rl
a
Riffle
o•' `.°-...tee o ' •r
q((i
01°j?+?"o `? rfr?
ff
p
O
rv r ?0?
y 7JJ a \
Q
The pattern of riffles, pools, and related features in a typical meandering channel.
4041
Plan View 'I-- / DLR
Cross section, profile and plan view of a Cross-Vane
Flow
I 1/3 1/3 _ 1/3
40"
3
w
0
a
N
0 co
O
o
w ? o
3
C
0
U
N
0
U
"i
a
0
s
0
3
s
0
U
h
Q
01
Y
a
v

Location
/Lz ng t 4
rirofi,Y? S
? lI

i
Channel Below Pond #2 Riffle XS 2
102
101.5
'101
0 100.5
7 100
m
W 99.5
99
98.5
98
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Width
Bankfull Dimensions Flood Dimensions Materials
7.4 x-section area (ft.sq.) --- W flood prone area (ft) --- D50 (mm)
13.0 width (ft) -- entrenchment ratio --- D84 (mm)
0.6 mean depth (ft) --- low bank height (ft) --- threshold grain size (mm):
1.5 max depth (ft) --- low bank height ratio
13.8 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.5 hyd radi (ft)
22.8 width-depth ratio
Bankfull Flow Flow Resistance Forces & Power
--- velocity (ft/s) --- Manning's roughness --- channel slope (%)
--- discharge rate (cfs) --- D'Arcy-Weisbach fric. --- shear stress (lb/sq.ft.)
--- Froude number -- resistance factor u/u* --- shear velocity (ft/s)
--- relative roughness --- unit strm power (lb/ft/s)
y
Cross Section
Distance SS HI FS Elevation Omit Notes
reference ID
instrument height
longitudinal station ---
Bankfull Stage
FS = 100 elev
elevation P? ---
L.ow Bank Height
FS
elevation
Flood Prone Area
width fpa I:
Channel Slope
percent slope ---
Flow Resistance _
Manning's "n" ^^
D'Arcy - Weisbach
Note:
(TI) (tt) (tt) (it) (tt) t3kt
100 100
100 99.7 Fnj
100 99.28 ?
100 98.81
100 98.52
100 98.63 ?
100 98.54 ?
100 98.62 ? .
100 98.68 ?
100 99.18 ?
100 99.55 ?
100 99.75 ?
100 100 ?

n
1

Channel Below Pond #2 Riffle XS 3
102
101.5
101
100.5
0
100

w 99.5 .?
99
98.5
98

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Width
Bankfull Dimensions Flood Dimensions Materials
9.6 x-section area (ft.sq.) --- W flood prone area (ft) --- D50 (mm)
12.0 width (ft) --- entrenchment ratio --- D84 (mm)
0.8 mean depth (ft) --- low bank height (ft) --- threshold grain size (mm):
1.5 max depth (ft) --- low bank height ratio
12.6 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.8 hyd radi (ft)
14.9 width-depth ratio
Bankfull Flow Flow Resistance Forces & Power
--- velocity (ft/s) --- Manning's roughness --- channel slope (%)
--- discharge rate (cfs) -- D'Arcy-Weisbach fric. --- shear stress (lb/sq.ft.)
--- Froude number --- resistance factor u/u* --- shear velocity (ft/s)
--- relative roughness --- unit strm power (lb/ft/s)

Cross Section
reference ID
instrument height
longitudinal station ---
Bankfull Stage
FS 100 elev
elevation ---
Low bank Height
FS ---
elevation
Flood Prone Area
width fpa
Channel Slope
percent slope ---
Flow Resistance
Manning's "n" -
D'Arcy - Weisbach "f" - -
Note:
Distance BS HI FS Elevation Omit NoteE
(tt) (it) (it) (tt) (it) bKt
100 100
100 99.5
100 99.4 ?
100 99.3
100 98.95
100 98.7 ?
100 98.6 ?
100 98.51 ?
100 98.48 ?
100 98.51 ?
100 98.65 ?
100 98.79 ?
- 100 98.98 ?
100 99.1 ?
100 99.67 ?
100 99.8 ?
100 100 ?

El I

Channel Above Pond #2 Riffle XS 1

100.8
100.6
100.4
0 100.2

100
w 99.8
99.6
99.4

99.2
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Width
Bankfull Dimensions Flood Dimensions Materials
6.4 x-section area (ft.sq.) --- W flood prone area (ft) --- D50 (mm)
15.6 width (ft) --- entrenchment ratio --- D84 (mm)
0.4 mean depth (ft) --- low bank height (ft) --- threshold grain size (mm):
0.6 max depth (ft) --- low bank height ratio
15.8 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.4 hyd radi (ft)
37.8 width-depth ratio
Bankfull Flow Flow Resistance Forces & Power
--- velocity (ft/s) --- Manning's roughness --- channel slope (%)
--- discharge rate (cfs) -- D'Arcy-Weisbach fric. --- shear stress (lb/sq.ft.)
--- Froude number --- resistance factor u/u" --- shear velocity (ft/s)
--- relative roughness --- unit strm power (lb/ft/s)
Cross Section
reference ID
instrument height
longitudinal station - -
Bankfull Stage
FS = 100 elev
elevation ---
Low Bank Height
FS
elevation
Flood Prone Area
width fpa
Channel Slope
percent slope -
Flow Resistance
Manning's "n" -
D'Arcy - Weisbach 'T'I
Note:
Distance SS HI FS Elevation Omit Notes
(ft) Ift) (ft) (ft) (ft) Bkf
0 100 0 100 ?
1 100 0.15 99.85
2 100 0.4 99.6 ?
4 100 0.3 99.7
5 100 0.49 99.51
6 100 0.45 99.55 ?
7.4 100 0.55 99.45 ?
8 100 0.58 99.42 ?
9 100 0.6 99.4 ? '
10.3 100 0.6 99.4 ?
10.8 100 0.61 99.39 ?
11.3 100 0.39 99.61 ?
12 100 0.39 99.61 ?
13 100 0.57 99.43 ?
14 100 0.4 99.6 ?
15.6 100 0 100 ?

?

Channel 1 Below Pond #2 Hiwassee Outlook Ridge. Below pond #2
East We st Distance
-2 0 30 80 130 180 230
450
400
350
300
U
250

200
0

150
0
Z
100
50
0
-50
Dimensions (ft) Ratios
Bankfull Width: 12.3 Sinuosity: 1.1
Meander Length: --- Meander Length Ratio: ---
Belt Width: --- Meander Width Ratio: ---
Radius of Curvature: --- Radius / BkF Width: ---
Channel Below Pond #2 Riffle XS 1
102
101.5
101
C 100.5
100
to 99.5
99
98.5
98
0 2 .4 8 8 10 12 14
Width
Bankfull Dimensions Flood Dimensions Materials
9.8 x-section area (ft.sq.) - W flood prone area (ft) --- D50 (mm)
12.0 width (ft) - - entrenchment ratio --- D84 (mm)
0.8 mean depth (ft) --- low bank height (ft) --- threshold grain size (mm):
1.5 max depth (ft) --- low bank height ratio
12.8 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.8 hyd radi (ft)
14.7 width-depth ratio
Bankfull Flow Flow Resistance Forces & Power
--- velocity (ft/s) --- Manning's roughness --- channel slope (%)
--- discharge rate (cfs) --- D'Arcy-Weisbach fric. --- shear stress (lb/sq.ft.)
--- Froude number --- resistance factor u/u` --- shear velocity (ft/s)
--- relative roughness --- unit strm power (lb/ft/s)
Distance BS HI FS Elevation Omit Notes
Cross Section (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Bkf
reference ID
instrument height
longitudinal station -
Bankfull Stage _
FS = 100 elev
elevation ---
IOW Bank Height
FS ---
elevation
Flood Prone Area
width fpa
Channel Slope
percent slope ---
Flow Resistance
Manning's "n"
D'Arcy - Weisbach T' -
Note:
0 100 0 100 ? :
2 100 0.24 99.76
3 100 0.6 99.4 ? -
3.4 100 1.1 98.9
4.4 100 1.25 98.75
5 100 1.37 98.63 ?
5.5 100 1.49 98.51 ?
6.4 100 1.51 98.49 ?
6.8 100 1.4 98.6 ?
7.2 100 1.38 98.62 ?
7.6 100 0.9 99.1 ?
9.4 100 0.86 99.14 ?
10.9 100 0.75 99.25 ?
12 100 0 100 ?
El I
1:1 1
? `
El I

El I .

El I

Recommended Native Species for
Stream Restoration
Trees
Yellow Buckeye
Sweet Birch
River Birch
Bitternut Hickory
Shagbark Hickory
Persimmon
Green Ash
Carolina Silverbell
Blackgum
Sycamore
Black Cherry
Black Willow
White Basswood
Aesculus octandra
Betula lenta
Betula nigra
Carya cordiformis
Carya ovata
Diospyros virginiana
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Halesia caroliniana
Nyssa sylvatica
Platanus occidentalis
Prunus serotina
Salix nigra
Tilia heterphylla
Small Trees and Shrubs
Tag Alder
Serviceberry
Red Chokeberry
Common Pawpaw
Sweet-shrub
Ironwood
Alternate Leaf Dogwood
Silky Dogwood
Hazel-nut
Witch Hazel
Winter Berry
Doghobble
Spicebush
Male-berry
Alnus serrulata
Amelanchier arbrea
Aroma arbutifolia
Asimina triboba
Calycanthus floridus
Carpinus caroliniana
Corns alternifolia
Corns amomum
Corylus Americana
Hamamelis virginiana
Ilex verticillata
Leucothoe axillaries
Lindera benzoin
Lyonia ligustrina
f
Small Trees and Shrubs (con't)
Umbrella Tree
Ninebark
Wild Azalea
Swamp Azalea
Swamp Rose
Silky Willow
Meadowsweet
Sweet Leaf
Withe-rod
Yellow-root
Herbaceous
Magnolia tripe tala
Physocarpus opulifolius
Rhododendron periclymenoides
Rhododendron viscosum
Rosa palustris
Salix sericea
Spirea latifolia
Symplocos tinctoria
I/iburnum cassinoides
Xonthorhiza simplicissima
Jack-in-the-Pulpit Arisaema triphyllum
Swamp Milkweed Asclepias incarnate
Fringed Sedge Carex crinata
Bladder Sedge Carex intumescens
Hop Sedge Carex lupulina
Lurid Sedge Carex lurida
Broom Sedge Carex scoparia
Tussock Sedge Carex stricta
Fox Sedge Carex vulpinoides
Turtlehead Chelone glabra
Umbrella Sedge Cyperus strigosus
Bottlebrush Grass Elymus hystrix
Joe-Pye Weed Eupatorium fistulosum
Boneset Eupatorium perfoliatum
Jewelweed Impatiens capensis
Soft Rush Ancus effuses
Rice Cutgrass Leersia oryzoides
Cardinal Flower Lobelia cardinalis
Great Blue Lobelia Lobelia siphilitica
Seedbox Ludwigia alternifolia
Switchgrass Panicum virgatum
Tearthumb Polygonum sagittatum
Green Bulrush Scirpus atrovirens
4
Herbaceous (con't)
Woolgrass
Soft Stem Bulrush
Bur-reed
March Fern
River Oats
Ironweed
Scirpus cyperinus
Scirpus validus
Sparganium americanum
Theypteris palustris
Uniola latifolia
Vernonia noveboracensis
Potential Sources For Plant Material
Herbaceous Material:
Niche Gardens
1111 Dawson Road
Chapel Hill, NC 27516
We-Du Nurseries
Rt. 5, Box 724
Marion, NC 28752
Shrub Material:
Campbell's Nursery
2816 Campbell Road
Raleigh, NC 27606
Cure Nursery
880 Buteo Road
Pittsboro, NC 27312
Fern Valley Farms
1624 Fern Valley Farm Road
Yadkinville, NC 27055
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
\ OF W A 7-,?R Michael F. Easley, Governor
r 4
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
iP- North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
August 28, 2006
DWQ Project # 06-0744
Cherokee County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 7005 0390 00013553 1305
Mr. Greg Mitchell and Ms. Patricia Roche
Zephyr Outlook, LLC
38058 Daughtery Lane
Zephyrhills, Florida 33540
Subject Property: Outlook Ridge
Murphy, Cherokee County
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Mitchell and Ms. Roche:
The purpose of this letter is to address the two main issues remaining for this project -
1) whether the streams are perennial or intermittent in nature and 2) the practical
alternatives analysis for this project.
I. Perennial or intermittent streams: As you know, Division of Water Quality staff
from the Central Office made a site visit to the project on August 18, 2006 (see
the DWQ letter dated August 22, 2006) in order to make a decision on whether
the streams on the site are perennial or intermittent. As our letter of August 22,
2006 states, we have determined that these streams are perennial rather than
intermittent.
II. Also, the Division of Water Quality has reviewed the information that you have
submitted in order to make a decision about practicable alternatives for this
project. The following is provided to dictate a course of action for this project.
The Division of Water Quality has carefully reviewed the information provided by
your consultant, submitted May 8, 2006, June 21, 2006, July 10, 2006, and July
31, 2006, and has determined that the construction of a single impoundment is a
practical alternative to the three proposed impoundments. As such, a complete
application, including the NW39 impacts for pond 4 (only) and for a single
culvert crossing above pond 4, and a restoration plan and schedule for all
impacted streams and wetlands onsite is appropriate for this development. This
will provide for a single impoundment as a community amenity, while serving to
comply with 15A NCAC 02B .0201 and 15A NCAC 02H .0506.
AUG 3 1 2006
UENR - WATER QUALITY NOne
401 Netlands Certification Unit Aatumllf
1650 %tail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
?hove: 919-733-17861 FAX [phone]Internet http:llh2o.enr.state.ne.us/nc?vetlands
An Equal Cpportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recydedl10% Post Consumer Paper
Outlook Ridge
Page 2of 3
August 28, 2006
The following must be included in your revised application:
1. A complete site plan for the development (at a 1" = 50' scale, surveyed, and
signed by a NC Licensed Surveyor) including all lots, roads, right-of-ways,
and accesses, all preserved areas, and all aquatic resources on the site. This
plan must include all lots for all phases of this development in order for us to
determine if additional cumulative impact will be occur during the construction
of the project.
2. A restoration plan for streams within the footprints of ponds 1, 2, and 3 which
would restore pattern, dimension, and profile for the impacted stream
segments along with a planting plan for wooded streamside buffers (at least
_ - _30 feet-wide),,-and a_stability_monitoring methodology and schedule-(minimum--- ---
of 5 years with twice-annual reporting), and a wetland restoration plan,
including sediment removal, replanting, and a wetland monitoring plan which
follows the above mentioned monitoring reporting schedule.
Please respond within three (3) weeks of the date of this letter by sending this
information to both the 401 Permitting Unit at:
Ms. Amy Chapman
401 Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
and to the Asheville Regional Office at:
Kevin Barnett
Surface Water Protection Section
2090 US HWY 70
Swannanoa, NC 28778
-If we do not hear from-you-within this-timeframe, we will assume_that you-o-longer_want- -
to pursue this project and we will consider the project as withdrawn. Until this
information is received, this application will remain on hold as incomplete. However, as
this site remains in violation of State Water Quality Regulations, a formal and complete
restoration plan will still be required to resolve those issues.
Outlook Ridge
Page 3of 3
August 28, 2006
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to
wetlands, waters or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested
within your application are not authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Mr.
Kevin Barnett at 828-296-4657 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set
up a meeting to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
4dZ
Roger C. Edwards, Regional Supervisor
Division of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection Section
RCElkhb
cc: Mona O'Bryant
Smith Moore LLP
300 North Greene Street
Suite 1400
Greensboro, NC 27401
Jennifer Robertson, Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc.
Post Office Box 882
Canton, NC 28716
Amy Chapman, 401 Permitting Unit, Central Office
David Baker, USACE Asheville Regulatory Field Office
David McHenry, Wildlife Resources Commission
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 06-0744.OutlookRidge.On-Hold
0F /9Q Michael F. Easley, Governor
?
O ( Willi
R
J
S
t
G
i am
oss
r.,
ecre
ary
.
co, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
? -i
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
August 22, 2006
DWQ EXP# 06-0744
Cherokee County
Zephyr Outlook LLC
38058 Daughtery Road
Zephyrhills, FL 33540
Subject Property: Outlook Ridge, Murphy, NC
UT to Baine Branch [040502,1-81, C1
On-Site Intermittent/Perennial Stream Determination
Dear Sir or Madam:
On August 18, 2006, at the request of Kevin Barnett of the Asheville Regional Office of the Division of
Water Quality, Amy Chapman performed an on-site determination to review five stream features located
on the subject property to determine whether they were ephemeral, intermittent or perennial. The feature
that is above pond #1 is labeled as "A", the feature that is between pond #1 and pond #2 is labeled as "B",
the feature that is below pond #2 is labeled as "C", the feature that was previously pond #3 and below the
applied for road crossing is labeled as "D", the feature that is below pond #4 is labeled as "B" and the
feature that is below the spring head leading into pond #4 is labeled as "F" on the attached map, initialed
by Ian McMillan on August 21, 2006. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has determined that the
following:
¦ Feature "A", "B", "C", "D", and "E" are perennial.
¦ Feature "F" is ephemeral.
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter.
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWQ that a surface water exists
may request a determination by the Director. A request for a determination by the Director shall be
referred to the Director in writing c/o Cyndi Karoly, DWQ 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting
Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260. You must act within 60 days of the date that you
receive this letter. Applicants are hereby notified that the 60-day statutory appeal time does not start until
the affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. This
determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing within 60 days.
This letter only addresses the determination of whether the stream features are ephemeral, intermittent or
perennial and does not approve any activity within Waters of the United States or Waters of the State.
401 Oversight/ Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: httv://h2o.enr,state.nc.us/ncwetiands
Nom` Carolina
Naturally
4n Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: Project: Latitude:
Evaluator: Site (= Longitude:

Total Points: c - Other
Stream is at least intermittent County:
e.g. Quad Name:
if a 19 or perennial if t 30 I

IN `F "
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = y Absent Weak Moderate Strong
18. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
98 Natural levees 0 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 T 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 .5 1.5.
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No =
Yes = 3
" Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R Hvrirninnv (Suhtntni 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel - d or growing season 0 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1 5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 es =
C_ Rlnlnnv (Suhtntal = I 1
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 - 0
21b. Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 LIP
22. Crayfish 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteda/fungus. 0.5 1
i9-5'. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; ther =
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland piants-,___/
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: Project: 0( ?Latitude:
Evaluator:^ Site: - Longitude:
Total Points: Other
l ?) Stream is at least Intermittent 3 ` S County: e.g. Quad Name•
If Z 19 or perennial if t 30 lam' '
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = O Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1e. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 C3D
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 ' 1 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 . 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 1 2 3
9' Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts .0 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0
Yes = 3
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H drolo Subtotal =
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel - d or rowin season 0 1 2
16. Leaflitter 1 L 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 es = 1.5
v
C. Biology (Subtotal

0 . Fibrous roots in channel
-i-05.-
3
2
1
0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1 1.
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; L = 1. SAV = 2.0; Ot = 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence o c or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1 \
' Date: g d Project: ( f ) Latitude:

Evaluator: Site: Longitude:
?L
Total Points:
m is at least Intem7ittent
St
e
County: 1P -491 Other
r
a
r
7
i e.g. Quad Na me.
f9 or erennlal If a 30
if

A. Geomorphology. subtotal ? Absent. Weak M##guMsi- Strong
1°. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 3
uosi 0 2
channel structure: riffle- ool se uence 0 2
l texture or stream substrate sortin 0 3
ive/relic flood lain 0 1
ositional bars or benches
p . 0 1 2
channel
-7.Brelded 1 2 . 3
ent alluvial de osits 1 2
ural levees 1 2 3
10. Headcuts • 0 1 2
11. Grade controls 0. 0.5 1
12. Natural valley or dralnageway 0 0.5 1
13. Second or greaterarder channel on ex_ isttng
USGS or NRCS map or other documented No = Yes = 3
evidence.
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual

R_ Hvdroloav (Subtotal
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2• 3 .
15. Water In channel.and > 48 hrs since rain, ,off
Water In channel - dry, or growing season 0 1 2 3
16. Lesflitter .5 1 •0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0. 1 1.5
18: Organic debris lines or piles.(Wrack lines) 0 `0.5 1 .1.5-
19. Hyddc soils redoxim hic features) present? No = 0 es = 1.
(. Rinlnnv (Subtotal = ?? )
20b. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 D. Rooted, lants•in channel 4-2) 1 2 1 0
22, Crayfish 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24: Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25: Amphibians 0• 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance), -0 0.5 1 .5
27. Filamentous algae; perlph on 0 1 . 2 •3
28. Iron oxidizing bacterla/fun us. 0 o.5 1 1:
i9 i'6. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FA CW = 0.75. OBI = SAV.:= 2.0; Other = 0
Items 20 and 21 focus-on the presence of upland plants, item 29 focuses on the presence of.Watic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back slide of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
• SPA ?.? ` S??' ?--,= ?n : ? ?rQ?-. ,

A. Geomo holo (Subtotal= C"d -S Absent Weak Mddbrate Strong
I a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplaln 0 1 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 1 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2
8. Recent alluvial deposits .. 0 1 3
9." Natural levees CO 1 2 3
10. Headcuts .0 1 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1. .
13. Second or greater order channel on exl? sting
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0
Yes = 3
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R I-wImInnv !Ciihtnfal c 1 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel - d or rowin season 0 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piies.(Wracklines) 0 0.5 1.5
-
19. Hydric soils redoximorphlc features) present? No = 0 . es = 1.5
(`. Rinlnnv LS`ithtntal = I V •? 1 '
20b. Fibrous roots In channel 3 1 0
21 . Rooted plants'in channel 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians t 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2
28. Iron oxidizing bacteriatfungus. 0 0.5 1
i9 i'6. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV...= 2.0; ther = 0
"items 20 and 21 focus. on the presence of upland plants, item z5 focuses on me presence or aquatic or wetiano prams.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
(? I ?-e.? c .5? ?? •? 5 dom. ?f ?•. 5 c?.s.?s? -
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream 'identification Form; Version 3.1

A. Geomo holo Subtotal = Absent Weak IVidderate Strong
1°. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 (2) 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 C 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 2 3
9.° Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts .0 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 l 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainagewa 0 0.5
13. Second or greater order channel on exi^ sting
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
= 0
Yes = 3
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions m manual
14 WwArnInew
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 N 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water In channel - d or growing season 0 1 2 3'
16.Leaflitter L1. 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles.(Wrack lines) 0 0. 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes = 1.5
f: Rinlnrni /Cnhfnfal _ ? I 1 20b. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0

21 . Rooted plants In channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish Q7 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25: Amphibians 0
-
- 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 770T 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periph on 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants In streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; BL =.1.5 AV,= 2.0; Other = 0
"Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, item ze focuses on the presence OT aquauc or wenano plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream 'identification Form; Version 3.1
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1

Date: - ob Project: + ouC - d Latitude:
Evaluator: Site: Q Longitude:
Total Points: Other
Stream is at least Interm/ttent 3, 5 County: e.g. Quad Name:
If 2 19 or erennlal I Z 30
A. Geomo holo (Subtotal= 1 A sent Waak_ Mddorate S'tromg
1°. Continuous bed and bank 0 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 ?2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 ( 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplaln 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 1,2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 . 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits . • 0 1 2 3
9' Natural levees 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existincT
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
,
No=0 Yes = 3
Man-made dltCnes are not ratea;psee mscussions in manual
R_ Hvrlminnv (Suhtntal = ©? 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water In channel - d or growing season 0 1 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1.5
18: Organic debris lines or piles.(Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes = 1.
R Rinlnnv (RuhtntA 1
b
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
3
2 ?
1 1
0
21 . Rooted plants in channel
[ 3 2 1 0
22.. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish 0.5 1 1.5
25: Amphibians 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note dlverslty and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; perlphyton 0 1 2 C
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; L =!.S 2.0; Other = 0
'Items 20 and 21 Tocus on the presence or upiana punts, item za Tocuses on the presence or agmwc or weuano pianw.
• Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)

?,??"
[Fwd: Re: Outlook Ridge]
Subject: [Fwd: Re: Outlook Ridge]
From: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:09:17 -0400
To: Amy Chapman <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Outlook Ridge
From: Kevin Barnett <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 08:17:32 -0400
To: Mona OBryant <[e-mail]>
CC: David Baker <[e-mail]>, David McHenry
<[e-mail]>, Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>, Roger Edwards
<[e-mail]>, Danny Smith <[e-mail]>, Jennifer Robertson
<[e-mail]>, Becky Fox <[e-mail]>, Bryan Tompkins
<[e-mail]>, Kerry Becker <[e-mail]>
Good Morning Mona:
The results from the onsite audit, all of the streams have been rated as perennial.
After a discussion with the Corps, a decision as to how the project will be handled
with regards to these stream calls will be relayed as soon as possible.
Best regards,
Kevin
Kevin Barnett - [e-mail]
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Water Quality Section
2090 U.S. 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Kevin Barnett <Kevin.Barnettpncmail.net>
NC DENR - Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Water Quality Section
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Re: Outlook Ridge
Content-Encoding: 7bit
I of I 8/21/2006 2:29 PM
Re: stream calls on Friday
Subject: Re: stream calls on Friday
From: Kevin Barnett <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 07:18:37 -0400
To: Amy Chapman <[e-mail]>
Hi Amy:
First site in Transylvania County.
No goo way to get there without driving within 5 min of office.
I can meet you elsewhere is that is more conv. for you.
A good meeting place is to take I-40 West to I-26 East. Take I-26 East to the Asheville Airport Road
exit (exit # 40).
Turn right and we can meet at the Mr. Pete's gas station beside the BMW dealership (-100 yards down
from exit).
Let me know if this works for you.
--Kevin
Amy Chapman wrote:
Kevin,
For the first stream call/appeal, I believe you had said it would be in Cherokee, right? Well if
that's the case, can you give me directions to the site? I can call you as we're leaving Murphy and
we could meet there. It'd cut a good 1 1/2 hours driving down for me. And then I could follow you
back to Murphy for site #2. Sound good?
Thanks for your help.
-Amy
----Original Message----
From: Kevin.Barnett(-,ncmail.net
Date: Aug 15, 2006 15:17
To: &quot;Amy Chapman&quot;
Subj: Re: stream calls on Friday
1 of 4 8/16/2006 2:22 PM
Re: stream calls on Friday

That would be great.
I am at work at 7:30 most mornings.
Any time you can arrive would be great.
` K
ovma iVW'AS TI
Ar&
la"?Rs?
If you arrive prior to 8, call my desk at 828-2964657 or my cell at
828-230-8470 so I can go get you.
Thanks and travel safe,
Kevin
Amy Chapman wrote:
Hey Kevin!

Just wanted you to know that we're coming up Thursday night instead of
driving up Friday(thank goodness that worked out), so if you wanted me
(and possibly my husband) to meet you earlier at your office on Friday
I could. Just let me know as soon as you can. Thanks.
-Amy
2 of 4 8/16/2006 2:22 PM
[Fwd: Re: Outlook Ridge]
Subject: [Fwd: Re: Outlook Ridge]
From: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:04:15 -0400
To: Amy Chapman <[e-mail]>
fyi
Subject: RE: Outlook Ridge
From: "Mona OBryant" <Mona. OBryant@smithmoorelaw. com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:00:24 -0400
To: "Kevin Barnett" <[e-mail]>
CC: "David Baker" <[e-mail]>, "David McHenry"
<[e-mail]>, "Cyndi Karoly" <[e-mail]>, "Roger Edwards"
<[e-mail]>, "Danny Smith" <[e-mail]>, "Jennifer Robertson"
<[e-mail]>, "Becky Fox" <[e-mail]>, "Bryan Tompkins"
<[e-mail]>, "Kerry Becker" <[e-mail]>
Kevin,
It appears that there may be multiple misunderstandings in this matter. It was and
is my understanding that the Corps had said that it did not require an IP and
preferred a nationwide if certain impacts were eliminated. I did not mean to
suggest that the Corps had done a site visit.
It this point, I think it would be most helpful if the various parties could meet
to discuss the project and how to proceed. Would you be willing to participate in
such a meeting? If so, I will try to coordinate a time.
Thank you. Mona O'Bryant
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Barnett [mailto:[e-mail])
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 9:08 AM
To: Mona OBryant
Cc: David Baker; David McHenry; Cyndi Karoly; Roger Edwards; Danny
Smith; Jennifer Robertson; Becky Fox; Bryan Tompkins; Kerry Becker
Subject: Re: Outlook Ridge
Good Morning Mrs. O'Bryant:
It appears that you have some mis-information.
The US Army Corps of Engineers has not performed a site specific
evaluation'iat this time (as verified by a phone conversation with the
Asheville Regulatory Field Office this morning). The Corps has made no
determination on the.perenniality of the streams in question. Only the
DWQ (along with questions from the NC Wildlife Resources Commission) has
made an agency decision that the streams are perennial.
The consultant for your client has stated as part of the application
that the streams in question are intermittent and "appealed" this
agencies determination.
Until an audit is performed on these stream determinations, the DWQ
maintains that the streams are perennial, and that the project is
subject to an Individual Permit (based on Corps policy, DWQ policy, and
1 of 3 8/11/2006 11:04 AM
[F%Nd: Re: Outlook Ride]
15x'1 NCAC 02H .0501 (c) (1) ). Scheduling is currently underway for this
audit and your client will be notified such that he may comply with 15A
NCAC 02H .0502 (e). Pending this audit, the Division must keep the
project on hold and hold any final Agency decision, pending the outcome
of the audit and an application which reflects this determination.
_rregardless of these actions, nothing should be preventing your client
frc-.i applying for, receiving, and implementing a stream restoration and
wetland restoration plan (under a Nationwide 13/27 and concurrent Water
Quality General Certification (GC3495)) which would restore the physical
characteristics, biological integrity, pattern, profile and dimension of
these resources which are not proposed to be impacted under the proposed
application. Additionally, your client should be aware that lacking
sufficient "avoidance and minimization" for the proposed impacts, he
should be prepared to perform restoration of some or all wetlands and
streams on the subject property, pending the Agency final decision.
East regards,
Kevin
Mcna O'Bryant wrote:
Kevin,
Thar:{ you for the information. As you know, the site developer
originally planned to go the IP route and was informed by the Corps
that the streams were intermittent and thus changed course. There is
no intent to be difficult. My client appreciates your willingness to
review this.
Mcna O'Bryant
-----Original Message -----
*From:* Kevin Barnett [mailto:[e-mail]
*Sent:* Wednesday, August 09, 2006 6:53 PM
*To:* Mona O'Bryant
*Subject:* Re: Outlook Ridge
Mrs. OBryant:
The on-site audit of the Agency stream rating sheets has been
scheduled. The applicant will be notified prior to this occuring.
Please make your client aware that this developement is still a
Violation site and that incomplete applications, technical
differences, and appeals of Agency decisions only serve to further
this office's being able to make an Agency decision on the
application.
Best regards,
Kevin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with the requirements
of IRS Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained
in this cc=unication or attachment hereto is not intended or written
to be used and cannot be used for the purpose of avoiding penalties
under the Internal Revenue Code or for promoting, marketing or
2 of3 8/11/2006 11:04 AM
[Fwd: Re: Outlook Ridge]
recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in
this communication or attachment.
Kevin Barnett - [e-mail]
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Water Quality Section
2090 U.S. 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with the requirements of IRS Circular
230, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication or
attachment hereto is not intended or written to be used and cannot be used for the
purpose of avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or for promoting,
marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in
this communication or attachment.
-7 i
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Re: Outlook Rid e'
Content-Encoding: 7bit
3 of 3 8/11/2006 11:04 AM

n
! 1?? ? I
Wetland and Natural Resource
Consultants, Inc.
July 31, 2006
Mr. Kevin Barnett
NC Division of Water Quality
2090 U5 Highway 70
Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778
RE: Outlook Ridge
Cherokee County, North Carolina
DWQ Project # 06-0744
Mr. Barnett and Mr. Baker:
Mr. David Baker
U5 Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Ave., Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28806
rt;
LEI
;
V
AUG 0 Z006
DEr,R "A TER QU- LI Y
t-
Please reference the project known as Outlook Ridge, located northwest of Murphy in
Cherokee County, North Carolina. The purpose of this correspondence is to provide
further photographic documentation of the intermittent nature of the stream features
located within the property boundary. All photographs presented were taken during a site
visit conducted on July 27, 2006. According to The Weather Channel Interactive, Inc.,
Murphy and the geographical region surrounding Murphy received 1.02 inches of rain in the
seven days preceding the site visit. The day of the site visit the area received 0.16 inches
of rain.
Please add this correspondence to your respective files. An explanation for each photo is
as follows:
Picture 1- This is a photo of the stream feature located above and f lowing into Pond 1.
Notice vegetation growing within the channel bed.
Picture 2 - This is a photo of the stream feature located above and flowing into Pond 1.
The reach depicted in this picture is located upstream of the reach depicted in Picture 1.
Water has collected in a depressional area caused by large logging trucks moving into and
out of the area. Notice that although water is collecting in this localized area, no water is
flowing into or out of the pool.
Canton Office Newton Office
PO Box 882 wnrinc.com PO Box 224
Canton, NC 28716 Newton, NC 28658
828-648-8801 828-465-3035
828-648-8802 Fax [phone] Fax
Picture 3 - This is a photo of the stream feature located above Pond 1, as it f lows into
Pond 1. Notice minimal flow despite recent rain event and vegetation growing within
channel bed. Since it was raining and cloudy the day of this field evaluation the
photographs below pond #2 are dark. The stream below ponds #1 and #2 has a flow width
of 6" to 1'.
Picture 4 - This is a photo looking up towards the sediment basin located on the right side
of Pond 4 (if you are standing on the dam looking upstream). Notice large amounts of
vegetation growing in the channel feature.
Picture 5 - This is a photo of the channel feature within the bottom of Pond 4. Notice
minimal water despite recent precipitation.
Picture 6 - This is a photo of the restored section of channel / linear wetland at the
previous Pond 3 location. Notice minimal f low despite recent precipitation.
Picture 7 - This is a photo of the origin of the restored section of channel / linear wetland
at the previous Pond 3 location. Notice vegetation growing within the channel bed.
Picture 8 - This is an overview photo of Pond 4.
Picture 9 - This is a photo of the linear wetland feature located above the previous Pond 3
location. Notice minimal water flow with vegetation growing within the bottom.
Picture 10 - This is a photo of the channel feature that has been created by the Pond 4
sediment basin.
Picture it - This is a photo of the channel feature within the bottom of Pond 4. Notice
minimal water despite recent precipitation.
Picture 12 - This is a photo of the channel segment below Pond 4.
During construction that involves grading and excavation (especially in the mountains), it is
not uncommon for contractors to uncover underground seeps and springs. As these areas
surface, it is common practice for contractors to continue to excavate the area until
enough flow is generated such that it can be channeled away from the area. This has been
the case at Outlook Ridge. These once underground seeps and springs at Outlook Ridge
are providing more continuous flow than the once surface intermittent streams provided
before grading and excavation began.
Canton Office Newton Office
PO Box 882 wnrinc.com PO Box 224
Canton, NC 28716 Newton, NC 28658
828-648-8801 828-465-3035
828-648-8802 Fax [phone] Fax
The developers have provided pictures of an old house that was located on the property at
what is now the dam of pond #1. They have explained that there was a dry ditch that they
used to step into to get to the house. The only pictures of the pond areas that the
developers have are included in Attachment C and include the old house located at the dam
of pond #1. The dry ditch is just in front of the house in the pictures. The contractor
that constructed ponds #1 and #2 has indicated that the spring house existed below the
old house which would have been located near the base of dam #1. The contractor also
indicated that the surface water flowing out of this spring house down into what is now
pond #2 had a flow pattern that surfaced then went underground.
Should you require any further information associated with the Outlook Ridge
development, please do not hesitate to contact me at 828-712-9205.
Best regards,
ennifer Robertson
Enclosures:
Attachment A - Site Pictures
Attachment B - Map of Ponds
Attachment C - Old House Pictures
"Should you not receive the above attachments with this correspondence, please
contact us immediately so that we may provide this supplemental information."
Cc: Mrs. Cyndi Karoly, 401 Permitting Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Mr. Greg Mitchell, Zephyr Outlook, LLC, 38058 Daughtery Lane,
Zephyrhills, Florida 33540
Mr. Brian Kruger, Environmental Logic, Inc., 1215 Low Gap Road,
Hayesville, North Carolina 28905
Canton Office Newton Office
PO Box 882 wnrinc.com PO Box 224
Canton, NC 28716 Newton, NC 28658
828-648-8801 828-465-3035
828-648-8802 Fax [phone] Fax
MIEll
Attachment A
r ,..'F? ? ^ F?? x a a ,? S j ? {?.?'? I(. ?yf?g y?.,c?.ts',.? .•. j? f
Olt
11 ?Y1
r 1?1t ??r?Y keii{' ..?{I06?a -r
n n ( S l,'? ! 4 r
01*
i ?J+? `-? ?S' r! t. r t ,??w 1, ?r"?R?- ??;. ?? •??,y'
r i? 1?? ' s' ?w ?1 H`~ r ' '( rx rPAN `" ?'rlr Y I F4
t S,r ?` y ( ?,?r f tif, "'ASS • q,, ,I 'i,? 'Yf`_?
J,i
Picture 1 - feature above Pond 1
Po-
faf?pa
,rr a r+t
I '1A
"?• ey
A no
qi,
tii i • ` t4' .v i r,fag,:,s tt + , '`J'ot
' Ra"' } b c, s Cu Ott S ?x r r
?y? AA w
- •? rap s ?,y?{? .'` "'' ,'i'fs 9C? ?•+i ?d ? L e r s rrf ?dit ,"` ?'?? v ?!
T. ?y l ?,' jY?f
Picture 2 - feature above Pond l; water pooling in truck ruts
1

?eaj
Attachment A

2
iroi ,V d? 1 ?, ,.'' ? •riy?'I d)?- i 9 ?1?.y?,?,y?'? {j l ? s °71'
d } t
. ?>•t 1` may, r'1' a ?'? 4 ?,y .+`-?A' -? ?? ?Z44?r'0 ??Y.
h \ 5pyr. ?r . .t rw 5 +gvC,ti ? f "1i'L` ?r
461
'e
e ?
•f ...if F / q/?f
V"-4, i
?{ f xE' C G1 f. 1p Y• 2 lh,
yr,rl"oil
F M F 4 15 ti, AW.. d x_. t r{V
44. 'ji
.?G?*vA J Y a I ]"? 5 .ally. Y`,?;?rY
? &. , a55 , ?-r, PLC P
?,v!'3l,R•,. s?' d.? ' i :,???SeeE: ice.. w

Ak.

74

.u,,''? -?: y •,;.??.ca*"`f ? ?i?? .der ? ? '?,. ?'*.

??j?' ? ',.. ?.? ? .. ...?.. .., .sue;.. -_:'...
tel: rc l..x a'?' ?L
Picture 4 - sediment basin on right side of Pond 4
Picture 3 - feature flowing into Pond 1
Mien
Attachment A

Picture -st?uuiin(y at head of Pond -t; IookinR toNN,11'ds dam
9 tif;
raw. M
x ;+ J60 rR soy, 5 r r ., ? ?,
iii ,?• tr, ??' ,t_ ''" ? ,w?,?..,.'2'.' ..
Y -
!
'i
r
.*r w ?e. ?? .!j ?w ,.1? 7 we - ;.a
,?w'r ''.? ? Yn' . ??,' ,.? ? 111 , -? y .. _ _
ryp Ml'W? a ??}!??
Sw' ?;" y ?a ate. r?.??.r rr? .,,i'F 1?G.ht?? ?S',7?. "_?y ?i'?
a as s &
fir
`kG
•L)
-f Ji y{ a q /yyy??? ? t , 4 y f
Picture 6 - restored section; previous location of Pond 3

Attachment A

F 0, ra ',
• ` tL ?N?? T?,? r ? t ?(e "?.
r
9F Af
7
4 s ? }tfi ! '7( _V
n.
I g t - ? ? ? ! - fl 1 ? i alt,
?; r d
7g?,11 ?., ?? kf I I IZ p?c \'
V
Picture 7 - linear wetland above restored segment
- 3

'?.e1?Q
4
Picture 8 - overview of Pond 4
?ll? f
Attachment A
y
w
a.,
5
Picture 9 - feature above Pond 3
1110!1
Attachment A
Picture 10 -standing in sediment basin; looking into Pond 4
Attachment A 7
MIM

V

Picture 11 - feature flowing into Pond 4
?nfflt
Attachment A 8
Picture 12 - feature downstream of Pond 4
w l
I ?
'f
,�y�. /J 111 ''� � . �,.� , � '•-
Fiji+; :K •1 ��•w.>• el.. .. .. - I. '�_ `3' .... •9.Lol—
I lmllsl9t I
��1:� , '��.vrt++ � - - — � `� �' �• " ���""9r'-n.+t J� �'�r''{!.: �: tt ei+ , �{�.. i y 'ri Ii�� 5. y..� � !!•
i
k

r? WA?RQ Michael F. Easley, Governor
?, * William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
-=? Division of Water Quality
July 18, 2006
DWQ Project # 06-0744
Cherokee County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED - 7005 0390 0001 3553 1152
Mr. Greg Mitchell and Ms. Patricia Roche
Zephyr Outlook, LLC
38058 Daughtery Lane
Zephyrhills, Florida 33540
Subject Property: Outlook Ridge
Murphy, Cherokee County
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Mitchell and Ms. Roche:
The NC Division of Water Quality is in receipt of your consultant's most recent submittal. As
your consultant has disagreed with the Stream Identification Forms completed by DWQ staff on-
site, the Division of Water Quality is placing this project on hold so that the stream calls can be
audited by Central Office Staff.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to
wetlands, waters or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your
application are not authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Mr. Kevin Barnett at 828-
296-4657 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this
matter.
Sincerely,
Roger C. Edwards, Regional Supervisor
Division of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection Section
RCE1khb
cc: Jennifer Robertson, Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc.
Post Office Box 882
Canton, NC 28716
Cyndi Karoly, 401 Permitting Unit, Central Office Ls 1! 1J
USACE Asheville Regulatory Field Office JUL, 2
David McHenry, Wildlife Resources Commission 4 2006
File Copy DENR • WATER QUALITY
Central Files " EUDSAMDSTORmWhr
Filename: 06-0744.OutlookRiMge
e N-Hold
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone]/ FAX [phone] / Internet htto://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Nf`
o Carolina
Nfirrall!1
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
SMITH MOORS LLP
T T 0 11 "\ E Y S a T E A W
July 20, 2006
Mr. Kevin Barnett Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Division of Water Quality Division of Water Quality
Asheville Regional Office Wetlands Branch
2090 U.S. Highway 70 1617 Mail Service Center
Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778 Raleigh NC 27699-1617
Re: Outlook Ridge - DWQ Project # 06-0744
Dear Kevin and Cyndi:
It is our understanding that there has been some disagreement regarding the classification
of streams on the above-referenced Outlook Ridge project site. While Wetland and Natural
Resource Consultants (WNRC) has determined that the streams in question are intermittent, the
Regional Office believes that the streams are perennial. The Regional Office has indicated that
someone from the Central Office would be visiting the site to conduct an independent evaluation.
We have been asked by the developers of the project to make a formal request that
WNRC be informed of the date and time for this evaluation and be given the opportunity to be
present. Similar requests have been made on an informal basis prior to earlier visits by the
Division, but such notice was not provided. Since the project's consultant has submitted
justification for its conclusion that the streams are intermittent on more than one occasion, but
has not been provided with the reasons for a different conclusion by the Regional Office, it is in
the best interest of fairness and a final decision on the classification of these streams that all
interested parties have an opportunity to participate in the visit from the Central Office.
We would appreciate a visit to the site as soon as possible, since the project's County
approvals are on hold as well pending resolution of the DWQ issues. Please let me know if you
have any questions. With best regards, I am
Very truly yours,
SMITH MOORE LLP
Ramona Cunningham UBryant ? l-? R
cc: Greg Mitchell `_2 L3 Ulu' ?--2 O
Jennifer Robertson
u ; ? t? OQAl1TY
z PF1! TER BWAPJCll
Direct 336-378-5237 Fax [phone] mona.o'[e-mail]
PO Box 21927 (27420) 300 North Greene Street Suite 1400 Greensboro, NC 27401 336.378.5200 www.smithmoc)relaw.com
Atlanta Greensboro Raleigh Wilmington
u
' l
Wetland and Natural Resource
Consultants, Inc.
July 10, 2006
Mr. Kevin Barnett
NC Division of Water Quality
2090 US Highway 70
Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778
RE: Outlook Ridge
Cherokee County, North Carolina
DWQ Project # 06-0744
Mr. Barnett:
? [2 ?9 L,-g P
,JUL 1 1 2006
wERANOSAND STORWATEER BRANCH
Please reference the "Request for More Information" dated June 29, 2006 sent by the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) in response to the permit application
submitted by Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants (WNR), on behalf of Zephyr
Outlook, LLC, requesting written authorization for the construction of a permanent road
crossing and amenity ponds associated with the development known as Outlook Ridge.
It is indicated that on June 12 and June 21, 2006, DWQ observed "work" associated with
the dam building/dam removal process occurring at the location of Ponds 3 and 4. On June
12, 2006, at the recommendation of WNR, Zephyr Outlook, LLC was installing a riser pipe
on the outflow for Pond 4. An outfall pipe had been previously installed in the dam;
however, it did not include any type of riser. During WNR's site visit, it was noted that
water was flowing along the proposed pond bottom, which was comprised of loose soil,
causing large amounts of sediment to enter the unnamed tributary. The sediment laden
water was posing an eminent threat to Wetland B. In order to stop the sediment
transport and prevent sediment from entering the wetland, WNR felt the appropriate
course of action was to install a riser pipe that would allow for water to pool, thus dropping
it's sediment load and subsequently releasing water with a lower number of suspended
solids into the tributary. Had this action not been taken, large amounts of sediment would
have entered the wetland.
Canton Office Newton Office
PO Box 882 wnrinc.com PO Box 224
Canton, NC 28716 Newton, NC 28658
828-648-8801 828-465-3035
828-648-8802 Fax [phone] Fax
On June 21, 2006, "work" on site was associated with the removal of Pond 3. Elimination of
the pond was previously discussed with the US Army Corps of Engineers and at WNR's
recommendation, Zephyr Outlook, LLC began removing the components of Pond 3. The
developer is anxious to get this violation resolved and they, along with WNR, felt that
delaying the removal of Pond 3 would only increase detrimental effects downstream.
The DWQ has determined that supplemental information is needed to consider the above
referenced application complete. Four items have been specifically listed; these four
items are discussed below.
1. Lack of Practical Alternatives: The Outlook Ridge development is located
approximately 25 miles from Murphy, North Carolina; a small town with a
population of approximately 1,500. Due to the rural nature of Cherokee County,
Zephyr Outlook, LLC needed amenities that would draw potential residents into
their community. In order to be marketable to seasonal and fulltime residents,
Zephyr Outlook, LLC felt it was most effective to highlight existing open water
areas and add additional open water to their community. Without amenities to
draw residents to the community and increase lot and home values, the
development would not yield sustainable profits.
Zephyr Outlook, LLC did consider construction of one, centrally located
impoundment; however, this proposal was abandoned because of the
intermittent nature of the streams and their inability to supply adequate water
to a large, centrally located impoundment.
2. Avoidance and Minimization: Section VII of the permit application indicates
that an applicant "may" submit drawings of alternative plans for the project
area. It is not indicated that submission of these documents is mandatory for
permit review nor are these documents "specifically requested" as indicated in
the "Request for More Information" letter. It is merely inferred that these
documents can be submitted and will be accepted as supplemental information
by the regulatory agencies. Zephyr Outlook, LLC discussed other options for
their development; however, these options were only preliminarily discussed and
never progressed beyond their initial conceptualization. Because these plans
where only abstract in nature and in the interest of saving valuable time, money,
and resources, Zephyr Outlook, LLC opted not to continue with plans that would
be extraneous and irrelevant to their future development. Therefore, there
are no tangible plans presenting alternative options discussed for this site.
Canton Office Newton Office
PO Box 882 wnrinc.com PO Box 224
Canton, NC 28716 Newton, NC 28658
828-648-8801 828-465-3035
828-648-8802 Fax [phone] Fax
Zephyr Outlook, LLC has minimized impacts on site to the maximum extent
practical. Further minimization would decrease the likelihood of the
development's success. Only one road crossing is required to uphold the road
infrastructure; this road crossing is located at an existing crossing. Due to the
integrity and insufficient length of this pipe, it will need to be replaced and
lengthened. Zephyr Outlook, LLC has agreed to eliminate Pond 3 reducing
impacts by 0.032 acres of wetlands and 272 linear feet of streams.
Marketing material provided at Outlook Ridge indicates 6 "ponds" are to be
located within the development. WNR agrees that this material is misleading.
After discussion with Zephyr Outlook, LLC and subsequent site visits, it was
determined that the only true "ponds" proposed for the site were Ponds 1-4;
Pond 3 has since been eliminated. The other two features labeled as ponds are
existing wetland areas (labeled Wetland A and Wetland B on Attachment A).
These wetlands do contain some open water and therefore, were put onto the
marketing material as "ponds" to increase the community's appeal to potential
buyers.
After discussion with the US Army Corps of Engineers, it was agreed upon that
through the elimination of Pond 3, the re-establishment of the impacted stream
channel and linear wetland segments, and the preservation of all remaining
streams and wetlands on the property, Ponds 1, 2, and 4 could be permitted as
proposed. Zephyr Outlook, LLC continued with lot sales as planned around Ponds
1, 2, and 4; and the existing open water features contained within Wetlands A
and B, as it was verbally agreed upon that permitting would allow for the
continued construction of the feature not already existing (Pond 4). On June
21, 2006 at the time of DWQ's site visit, Greg Mitchell was meeting with the
development's new real estate team, ERA Real Estate. What could have been
misconstrued as a sales pitch aimed at potential buyers was actually Mr.
Mitchell conveying project plans and development goals.
As indicated in the permit application package submitted to the US Army Corps
of Engineers and the DWQ on June 21, 2006, 2427 linear feet of streams (all
remaining streams on the property) and 0.584 acres (all remaining wetlands on
the property) will be preserved; a 25-foot vegetative buffer will remain
adjacent to all water features. This equates to 10:1 preservation for hard
impacts associated with the dams and road crossing and 0.5:1 preservation for
flooding impacts. Property owners will be bound by Deed Restrictions to ensure
protection of these areas.
Canton Office Newton Office
PO Box 882 wnrinc.com PO Box 224
Canton, NC 28716 Newton, NC 28658
828-648-8801 828-465-3035
828-648-8802 Fax [phone] Fax
3. Stormwater Management: Item XI was inadvertently left un-addressed on
the permit application. It is estimated that after development is complete
approximately 3.5 acres will be considered impervious. This accounts for
approximately 6% of the entire site. Stormwater will be managed through the
use of BMPs. These activities include, but are not limited to the use of off line
sediment basins and silt fences; and establishment of native grass as temporary
ground cover. Impervious area at the Outlook Ridge development will not
exceed 20%.
4. Monitoring Plans: As indicated in the permit application package submitted to
the US Army Corps of Engineers and the DWQ on June 21, 2006, mitigation on
site is in the form of preservation; therefore, a mitigation plan and definition of
success criteria should not be required.
Zephyr Outlook, LLC and WNR disagree with the DWQ determination indicating that all
streams within the property are perennial. WNR can conduct the same evaluations on the
same streams and determine that the channels are intermittent. It is stated in the DWQ
"Identification Methods for the Origins of Intermittent and Perennial Streams; Version
3.1" that the "score given to an attribute reflects the evaluator's judgment of the average
degree of development of the attribute along a reach of stream at least 100 feet long"
Indicating that scoring is based on the evaluator's judgment leaves the assumption that
scores are variable and subsequent to the user's bias. WNR is including NCDWQ Stream
Identification Forms for the stream and/or linear wetland segments above Pond 1 and
above the previous Pond 3 location. These stream segments have been "impacted" in some
form, so in completing the forms, our best professional judgment has been used. The
segment of Baine Branch located on site, which is perennial, has not been and will not be
impacted. Therefore, WNR did not complete stream forms for this reach. If the
enclosed data forms and supplemental pictures cannot be relied upon or construed as
accurate, then Zephyr Outlook, LLC and WNR respectfully request an on site meeting to
evaluate the impacted streams.
Restoration of the impacted stream segments is not being done for mitigation credit;
instead Zephyr Outlook, LLC has agreed to re-establish the stream and linear wetland
segments in an effort to resolve the pending violation. The dam is being removed and the
channel is being allowed to return to its natural course without intervention. In order to
"jumpstart" production of viable vegetation, Zephyr Outlook, LLC has agreed to plant a
vegetative buffer. Re-establishment of the buffer will be done in accordance with the
"Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration" provided by DWQ and all plant material will
be from the "Master List of Native Plants" contained within that document.
Canton Office Newton Office
PO Box 882 wndnc.com PO Box 224
Canton, NC 28716 Newton, NC 28658
828-648-8801 828-465-3035
828-648-8802 Fax [phone] Fax
The DWQ has asked that a "mass balance equality" be achieved on site. Brian Kruger with
Environmental Logic, Inc. has preformed the appropriate calculations (Attachment B)
indicating how much excess sediment has entered the tributaries on site. It is important
to note that WNR and Environmental Logic were hired as a result of the issuance of the
NC DWQ Notice of Violation; therefore the sediment deposition downstream of the ponds
occurred prior to the involvement of either company. Had WNR and Environmental Logic
been involved with this project from its inception, these issues would have been handled
proactively as opposed to reactively. With this in mind, WNR and Environmental Logic
have explained to the developer the importance of containing excess sediment and they
are fully aware of the expectation that excess sediment entering the tributaries as a
result of their actions must be removed. Sediment within the tributaries evaluated by Mr.
Kruger will be removed by hand and disposed of in an on site, upland location. To ensure
sediment that has entered the stream is equal to the sediment removed, the volume of
sediment removed will be recorded and subsequently submitted to the agencies.
Should you require any further information associated with the Outlook Ridge
development, please do not hesitate to contact me at 828-713-1930 or Ms. Jennifer
Robertson at 828-712-9205.
Best regards,

Rebekah L. Newton
Enclosures:
Attachment A - Outlook Ridge Marketing Map (revised)
Attachment B - "Mass Balance Equality" Calculations and Letter
Attachment C - NC DWQ Stream Identification Forms
Attachment D - Additional Site Photographs
"Should you not receive the above attachments with this correspondence, please
contact us immediately so that we may provide this supplemental information."
Canton Office Newton Office
PO Box 882 wnrinc.com PO Box 224
Canton, NC 28716 Newton, NC 28658
828-648-8801 828-465-3035
828-648-8802 Fax [phone] Fax

a r- 00
O
R L r
LA o
LA
YI ?

n x.

Y ? ?n
`V

7
7

1 y
pj N
G g
N.
7
L O.
Q
O
v
C
n
0
a

/ ?C o
m ?' m
?' o o
C. -C
'
m (
`
A r
C
n A n _.
n ice.
d
n
'?

m
_.
m
O 01
O N e
f
? m
N
O 0 1f?Ol ?y??
ft
V A
tD y
n
A
Q G
10 ? fdf
d

m ?
?
m

A n

Gt
/
C V N
V
V V
m N pp??
A N n N N ??-

p
V
m m ? m
N

m >ro
000
... ??
A
d N
A
d ? W '?V n
A N
?
n

O V Vq
d d m

m •10
d d _?
n ?
J
?°o yy
d p/
' A o
d r

1 __j
m
3
rn
z
m
r D
1 r)
m
T
wa
N
M

D
RIVER HILL ROAD
ATTACHMENT B

Environmental Logic, Inc.
1215 Low Gap Road, Hayesville, NC 28904 828,89-3609
July 7, 2006
To: Ms Patricia Roche & Mr. Greg Mitchell
Zephyr Outlook, LLC
5157 Epping Lane
Zephyrhills, FL 33541
RE: Outlook Ridge
Sediment Loss Analysis
Shoal Creek Township, Cherokee County, NC.
Dear Ms Roche & Mr. Mitchell,
As a response to the forwarded letter dated June 29, 2006 from Mr. Davis of the NC DENR
DWQ Surface Water Protection Section, I conducted a site inspection of Outlook Ridge on Friday
July 7, 2006. The purpose of the inspection was to estimate the amount of sediment deposited
downstream of pond numbers 2 and 4, to assist in determining the mass balance equality
calculation described on page 2 of the above referenced letter.
I walked downstream from both ponds, inserting a probe through sediment to the bedrock
in the streambed at measured intervals, noting widths and depths of sediment and water flow. The
results and estimated sediment volumes are described on the included information. Also included
are photographs of the monitored stream sections.
The measurement method described above only addressed the sediment volume as it
exists currently in the immediate measured area. It does not allow for possible sediment
deposition from off-site sources or extended time periods.
I am not familiar with approved methods of sediment removal from streams and/or wetland
areas. I prefer to focus on preventing erosion and minimizing the potential for sediment to be
carried off-site and therefore reducing the amount of sediment to be controlled. I would suggest
that strong efforts be afforded to minimize activity especially mechanized activity along the stream
and wetland areas downstream of the referenced ponds. The disturbance created by a sediment
removal operation would cause more sedimentation and equipment should not be used.
ATTACHMENT B
Outlook Ridge Down-Stream Sediment Measurement
July 7, 2006
POND #4
Point #1 30ft. downstream of pond slope toe
Water depth <1 in.
Stream width 2 in.
Average sediment width 4ft.
Average sediment depth 12.5 in. (1.04ft.)
Sediment Volume 125 cu. ft.
Point #2 60ft. downstream of pond slope toe
Water depth <1 in.
Stream width 2 in.
Average sediment width 4ft.
Average sediment depth 17.5 in. (1.46ft.)
Sediment Volume 87.5 cu. ft.
Point #3 90ft. downstream of pond slope toe
Water depth <1 in.
Stream width 3 in.
Average sediment width 3ft.
Average sediment depth 18.0 in. (1.5ft.)
Sediment Volume 135.0 cu. ft.
Point #4 120ft. downstream of pond slope toe
Water depth 8 in.
Stream width 3 ft.
Average sediment width 3ft.
Average sediment depth 9 in. (0.75ft.)
Sediment Volume 67.5 cu. ft.
Point #5 150ft. downstream of pond slope toe
Water depth 8 in.
Stream width 5 ft.
Average sediment width 4ft.
Average sediment depth 5 in. (0.41ft.)
Sediment Volume 50 cu. ft.
Point #6 200ft. downstream of pond slope toe (Wetland Area)
Water depth 2 in.
Stream width (variable) 50ft.
Average sediment width (variable) 50ft.
Average sediment depth 3 in. (0.25ft.)
Sediment Volume 250 cu. ft.
ATTACHMENT B
Outlook Ridge Down-Stream Sediment Measurement
July 7, 2006
POND #2
Point #1 30ft. downstream of pond slope toe
Water depth 1.5 in.
Stream width 10 in.
Average sediment width 10 in. (0.83ft.)
Average sediment depth 1 in. (0.08ft.)
Sediment Volume 2 cu. ft.
Point #2 60ft. downstream of pond slope toe
Water depth 1.5 in.
Stream width 12 in.
Average sediment width 12in. (1ft.)
Average sediment depth 1 in. (0.08ft.)
Sediment Volume 2.4 cu. ft.
Point #3 90ft. downstream of pond slope toe
Water depth 1.5 in.
Stream width 18 in.
Average sediment width 18in. (1.5ft.)
Average sediment depth 7 in. (0.58ft.)
Sediment Volume 26.1 cu. ft.
Point #4 120ft. downstream of pond slope toe
Water depth 1.5 in.
Stream width 16 in.
Average sediment width 18in. (1.5ft.)
Average sediment depth 4 in. (0.33ft.)
Sediment Volume 14.85 cu. ft.
Point #5 150ft. downstream of pond slope toe
Water depth 2 in.
Stream width 12 in.
Average sediment width 12in. (1.0ft.)
Average sediment depth 2 in. (0.17ft.)
Sediment Volume 5.1 cu. ft.
ATTACHMENT B
Point #6 180ft. downstream of pond slope toe
Water depth 2 in.
Stream width 12 in.
Average sediment width 12in. (1.Oft.)
Average sediment depth 2 in. (0.17ft.)
Sediment Volume 5.1 cu. ft.
Point #7 21 Oft. downstream of pond slope toe
Water depth 2 in.
Stream width 12 in.
Average sediment width 12in. (1.Oft.)
Average sediment depth 2 in. (0.17ft.)
Sediment Volume 5.1 cu. ft.
Point #8 240ft. downstream of pond slope toe
Water depth 2 in.
Stream width 12 in.
Average sediment width 12in. (1.Oft.)
Average sediment depth 2 in. (0.17ft.)
Sediment Volume 5.1 cu. ft.
Measurable Sediment from point #1 through point #8 - Total 65.75 cu. ft.
(downstream from pond #2)
}1T'AGttMEQT C.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1

Date: Project: ?,t ft "' 1 'e Latitude:
Evaluator. NI,? Site: Longitude: + .
Total Points: Others-_
Stream is at least intermittent ! County: Ct e.g, uadNam tr-? f^
if z 19 or erennial if a 30 !
A. Geomo holo (Subtotal 4.?; Absent Weak Moderate Strong
-i
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 01 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0_ 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 01 1 2 3
98 Natural levees
D
1 2
3
10. Headcuts 0 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
= 0
N
Yes = 3
USGS or NRCS map or other documented o
evidence. 11
a Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
0. n aroio ODULULCII -
14. Groundwater flow/discharge
0
1
2
3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or 0 1 2 3
Water in channel - d or rowin season
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.51
E 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
a O Q•5 1 .5
dc soils (redoximorphic features) present?
19. Hyd No = 0 Yes = 1.5

70-Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 (j) 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 2 1 0
22. Crayfish P
0.5 1
1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish t 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0.5 1
1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquduu u. wcual'v N.a. ....
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
PaT KA tNI61JTC?
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
CO ,
Date: Project: tf.? Latitude:
Evaluator: Site: Longitude: I
Total Points: r Other
Stream is at least intermittent County' e.g.+ uadName: ??
if Z 19 or perennial if t 30 `-

A. Geomorphology Subtotal = • 5 Absent Weak Moderate Strong
18. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 1 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain (00 1 2 i 3
6. Depositional bars or benches I CO 1 2 i 3
7. Braided channel (0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 1 2 3
9 a Natural levees C t? 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No=0 Yes = 3
Man-made ditches are not rated: see }discussions in manual
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
I Water in channel - d or growing season 0 (, 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 0.5 ; 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 GA. 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19 Hvdric soils (redoximorohic features) Dresent? No = 0 (Yes = 1.5
el /0-k6-4-1
_. -.-•-w ,--- - -
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
3 1 0 --
21". Rooted plants in channel 3. 2 1 0 I
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves (0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 I 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacterialfungus. 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC =-0.5: FACW = 0.75: OBL =1.5 SAV = 2.O;t`Other = 0
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
"Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, item zu tocuses on ine presence or aquauc or W11".111U Flat It*.
Sketch:
fT
ATTACHMENT D
ATTACHMENT D
Stream Segemer
Below Pond 2
a,

r. ?;, 1?y .?bf',
Ap
?
5, wo

?
kk !
S

sue' :: '?2 «f f T "-+,svk

Stream Flowi
R
.., a ..- I:
{
k
M9?
y? k.K:i e'pa. .
N?

no into Pond 4
ATTACHMENT D

n _
d ?^
Water flow from Pond #3 to Pond #4
Cc: "Mrs. Cyndi Karoly, 401 Permitting Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Mr. Roger Edwards, Surface Water Protection Section, 2090 US Hwy 70,
Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778
Mr. David Baker, US Army Corps of Engineers, 151 Patton Ave., Room 208,
Asheville, North Carolina 28806
Mr. Greg Mitchell, Zephyr Outlook, LLC, 38058 Daughtery Lane,
Zephyrhills, Florida 33540
Mr. Brian Kruger, Environmental Logic, Inc., 1215 Low Gap Road,
Hayesville, North Carolina 28905
JUL 1 2006
UrR _WATER QUALITY
: TIA;;DS Al 57QRjkw,4TER i3WICH
Canton Office Newton Office
PO Box 882 wnrinc.com PO Box 224
Canton, NC 28716 Newton, NC 28658
828-648-8801 828-465-3035
828-648-8802 Fax [phone] Fax
Subject: DWQ# 06-0744
From: Bev Strickland <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 15:40:53 -0400
To: Kevin Barnett <[e-mail]>
Outlook Ridge - Could you please send me a copy of the more information letter dated June
29, 2006. We need one for the file.
Thanks
Bev
W ATF
?O RQ Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r' North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
>_
,. bi w-- ?, a-)
Og 'C Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of WaterQuality
June 29, 2006
DWQ Project # 06-0744
Transylvania County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Greg Mitchell and Ms. Patricia Roche
Zephyr Outlook, LLC
38058 Daughtery Lane
Zephyrhills, Florida 33540
Subject Property: Outlook Ridge
Murphy, Cherokee County
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Mitchell and Ms. Roche:
On June 12 and June 21, 2006, Kevin Barnett of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
performed site visits regarding your application to impound waters as part of the Outlook
Ridge Subdivision. During each of these site visits, work in waters of the state were
continuing as part of the dam building / dam removal associated with impoundments 3 &
4. Additionally, during the June 21, 2006 site visit, Mr. Barnett spoke with Mr. Mitchell
during which Mr. Mitchell was actively showing lots for sale, including pond front
properties. As the Violations and Permitting issues at this site have not been resolved,
this is of great concern to this agency.
Based on your submittal, received on May 4, 2006 and additional information received
June 21, 2006, the DWQ has determined that your application was incomplete and/or
provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will require additional
information in order to process your application to impact protected wetlands and/or
streams on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive the additional
information requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as
required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until
we receive this additional information. Please provide the following information so that
we may continue to review your project.
Additional Information Requested:
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 "ail SerAce Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
NorthCarolina
,Natftra!!g
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Outlook[Zidge
Page2of 3
June 29, 2006
1. 15A NCAC 02H .0506 (f) requires that "a lack of practical alternatives" be
demonstrated. No discussion in regards to developing the project without the
significant number of impoundments, or a significantly reduced number of
impoundments, has been presented. A discussion regarding practical alternatives
with respect to a reduction of impacts must be presented.
2. Application Item VII requests a discussion regarding how impacts were avoided
or minimized. In the supplemental instructions contained within the application, it
is specifically requested that the "applicant may attach drawings of alternative,
lower-impact site layouts, and explain why these design options were not
feasible." The application also asks the applicant to "discuss how impacts were
minimized once the desired design plan was developed." The submitted
Avoidance and Minimization discussion provided addresses neither of these
issues. Additionally, the sales information onsite provides a document which
depicts 6 impoundments (at least one of which is located within a wetland) and
does not coincide with the submitted application. This document can be
construed as misleading to either regulatory agencies or to the purchasers of the
property in question. Lastly, as part of your Avoidance and Minimization
discussion, you must provide permanent protection of all remaining water
resources on the property in question, including buffers around all aquatic
features, such that future impacts to these resources will be avoided.
3. Application Item XI requests a discussion as to how stormwater will be managed
for the life of this development. No such discussion has been provided.
4. There is minimal information concerning monitoring plans or success criteria in
your submitted mitigation information. You must submit a monitoring plan and
define your success criteria in accordance with DWQ policy and include this in
your application.
During the June 21, 2006 site visit, the DWQ completed Stream Classification Forms
above pond 1, below pond 2, above pond 3 and below pond 4 and have graded out
these streams as perennial. As this effects mitigation requirements, a revised mitigation
plan must be submitted. Additionally, the streams below pond 2 and 4 have been
documented as being impacted by the development activities onsite. A restoration plan
for these stream segments must be developed along with an implementation schedule.
This shall include a mass analysis of sediments lost to the stream system and a tallying
mechanism for measuring the removed sediments such that a mass balance equality is
achieved. (ie: you must calculate how much sediment has been lost, and account for it
in the material removed from streams and wetlands.)
Please respond before the close of business on July 10, 2006 by sending this
information to both the 401 Permitting Unit at:
Mrs. Cyndi Karoly
401 Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
OutlookRidge
Page3of 3
June 29, 2006
and to the Asheville Regional Office at:
Kevin Barnett
Surface Water Protection Section
2090 US HWY 70
Swannanoa, NC 28778
If we do not hear from you before July 10, 2006, we will assume that you no longer want
to pursue this project and we will consider the project as withdrawn.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to
wetlands, waters or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested
within your application are not authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Mr.
Kevin Barnett at 828-296-4657 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set
up a meeting to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
Roger C. dwards, Regional Supervisor
Division of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection Section
RCE/khb
cc: Jennifer Robertson, Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc.
Post Office Box 882
Canton, NC 28716
Amanda Mueller, 401 Permitting Unit, Central Office V/
USACE Asheville Regulatory Field Office
David McHenry, Wildlife Resources Commission
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 06-0744.OutlookRidge.Add-Info
wo?
Baas
????.1tdA'?i;.Ft?U?,TE B?
IP changed to NW39 DWQ # 06-0744 Outlook Ridge
Subject: IP changed to NW39 DWQ # 06-0744 Outlook Ridge
From: Laurie Dennison <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 15:14:41 -0400
To: Ian McMillan <ian.mcmil lan@ncmail. net>
Ian -
06-0744 Cherokee County Outlook Ridge came in as an IP but I've received a revised
PCN changing it to NW39
L -
( cxv-? C?4
PC- n?
I Copy
1 of 1 6/23/2006 3:15 PM
IP changed to NW39 DWQ # 06-0744 Outlook Ridge
Subject: IP changed to NW39 DWQ # 06-0744 Outlook Ridge
From: Laurie Dennison <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 15:14:41 -0400
To: Ian McMillan <[e-mail]>
Ian -
06-0744 Cherokee County Outlook Ridge came in as an IP but I've received a revised
PCN changing it to NW39
L
1 of 1 6/28/2006 9:38 AM
[Fwd: Re: Outlook Ridge]
Subject: [Fwd: Re: Outlook Ridge]
From: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:29:36 -0400
To: Amy Chapman <[e-mail]>
fyi and add to file
Subject: Re: Outlook Ridge
From: Kevin Barnett <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:08:29 -0400
To: Mona O'Bryant <[e-mail]>
CC: David Baker <[e-mail]>, David McHenry
<[e-mail]>, Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>, Roger Edwards
<[e-mail]>, Danny Smith <[e-mail]>, Jennifer Robertson
<[e-mail]>, Becky Fox <[e-mail]>, Bryan Tompkins
<[e-mail]>, Kerry Becker <[e-mail]>
Good Morning Mrs. O'Bryant:
It appears that you have some mis-information.
The US Army Corps of Engineers has not performed a site specific evaluation at this
time (as verified by a phone conversation with the Asheville Regulatory Field
Office this morning). The Corps has made no determination on the perenniality of
the streams in question. Only the DWQ (along with questions from the NC Wildlife
Resources Commission) has made an agency decision that the streams are perennial.
The consultant for your client has stated as part of the application that the
streams in question are intermittent and "appealed" this agencies determination.
Until an audit is performed on these stream determinations, the DWQ maintains that
the streams are perennial, and that the project is subject to an Individual Permit
(based on Corps policy, DWQ policy, and 15A NCAC 02H .0501 (c) (1) ). Scheduling is
currently underway for this audit and your client will be notified such that he may
comply with 15A NCAC 02H .0502 (e). Pending this audit, the Division must keep the
project on hold and hold any final Agency decision, pending the outcome of the audit
and an application which reflects this determination.
Irregardless of these actions, nothing should be preventing your client from
applying for, receiving, and implementing a stream restoration and wetland
restoration plan (under a Nationwide 13/27 and concurrent Water Quality General
Certification (GC3495)) which would restore the physical characteristics, biological
integrity, pattern, profile and dimension of these resources which are not proposed
to be impacted under the proposed application. Additionally, your client should be
aware that lacking sufficient "avoidance and minimization" for the proposed
impacts, he should be prepared to perform restoration of some or all wetlands and
streams on the subject property, pending the Agency final decision.
Best regards,
Kevin
Mona O'Bryant wrote:
Kevin,
Thank you for the information. As you know, the site developer originally
1 oft 8/11/2006 10:34 AM
[F\cd: Re: Outlook Ridge]
planned to go the IP route and was informed by the Corps that the streams were
intermittent and thus changed course. There is no intent to be difficult. My
client appreciates your willingness to review this.
;tuna O' Bryant
-----Original Message -----
*From:* Kevin Barnett [mailto:Kevin.BarnettOncmail.net]
*Sent:* Wednesday, August 09, 2006 6:53 PM
*To:* Mona O'Bryant
*Subject:* Re: Outlook Ridge
Mrs. CBryant :
The on-site audit of the Agency stream rating sheets has been
scheduled. The applicant will be notified prior to this occuring.
Please make your client aware that this developement is still a
Violation site and that incomplete applications, technical
differences, and appeals of Agency decisions only serve to further
this office's being able to make an Agency decision on the
application.
Best regards,
Kevin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with the requirements of IRS
Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this
cc=unication or attachment hereto is not intended or written to be used and
cannot be used for the purpose of avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue
Code or for promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any
transaction or matter addressed in this communication or attachment.
Kevin Barnett - {evin.Barnettcncmail.net
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - water Quality Section
2090 U.S. 70 Highway
Swannanca, NC 28778
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Kevin Barnett <Kevin.Barnetta_ ncmail.net>
NC DENR - Asheville Regional Office
Dhision of Water Quality - Water Quality Section
Re: Outlook Ridge Content-Type: messagehfc822
Content-Encoding: 7bit
2 of 2 8/11/2006 10:34 AM
[Fwd: Re: Outlook Ridge]
Subject: [Fwd: Re: Outlook Ridge]
From: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:44:07 -0400
To: Amy Chapman <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Outlook Ridge
From: "Mona OBryant" <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:32:31 -0400
To: "Kevin Barnett" <[e-mail]>
CC: "David Baker" <[e-mail]>, "David McHenry"
<[e-mail]>, "Cyndi Karoly" <[e-mail]>, "Roger Edwards"
<[e-mail]>, "Danny Smith" <[e-mail]>, "Jennifer Robertson"
<V,[e-mail]>, "Becky Fox" <[e-mail]>, "Bryan Tompkins"
<[e-mail]>, "Kerry Becker" <[e-mail]>
Kevin,
That timing is fine, as we understand that the audit has been scheduled and should
be completed shortly. Once you let us know the timing of the audit, we can work
toward and meeting date.
Thanks. Mona
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Barnett [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 11:29 AM
To: Mona OBryant
Cc: David Baker; David McHenry; Cyndi Karoly; Roger Edwards; Danny
Smith; Jennifer Robertson; Becky Fox; Bryan Tompkins; Kerry Becker
Subject: Re: Outlook Ridge
Mrs O'Bryant:
I agree that there may be multiple misunderstandings. What I was trying
to relay to you is that no regulatory agency can tell the perennial /
intermittent nature of a stream without first doing a site visit.
As far as IP vs. Nationwide, irregardless of the Corps decision as to
the type of authorization issued, the Director of the DWQ has the
discretion to require an Individual Certification.
The largest concern is the continued work occurring on site even though
the environmental violations have yet to be resolved.
I will make myself available, as my calendar allows, for any
constructive meeting in regards to this application, but suggest that
waiting until the audit of the DWQ agency decision of the nature of the
resources (intermittent of perennial streams) be performed so that any
meeting and / or discussion can proceed with purpose towards resolving
violations to Waters of the State.
Best regards,
Kevin
1 of4 8/11/20062:55 PM
[Fw"d: Re: Outlook Ridge]
Nona OBryant wrote:
Kevin,
It appears that there may be multiple misunderstandings in this matter. It was
and is my understanding that the Corps had said that it did not require an IP
and preferred a nationwide if certain impacts were eliminated. I did not mean
to suggest that the Corps had done a site visit.
It this point, I think it would be most helpful if the various parties could
.eet to discuss the project and how to proceed. Would you be willing to
participate in such a meeting? If so, I will try to coordinate a time.
Thank you. Mona O'Bryant
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Barnett [;r:ailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, august 11, 2006 9:08 AM
=o: bona OBryant
Cc: David Baker; David McHenry; Cyndi Karoly; Roger Edwards; Danny
Smith; Jennifer Robertson; Becky Fox; Bryan Tompkins; Kerry Becker
Subject: Re: Outlook Ridge
Good Morning Mrs. O'Bryant:
It appears that you have some mis-information.
The US Army Corps of Engineers has not performed a site specific
evaluation at this time (as verified by a phone conversation with the
Asheville Regulatory Field Office this morning). The Corps has made no
determination on the perenniality of the streams in question. Only the
DriQ (along with questions from the NC Wildlife Resources Commission) has
made an agency decision that the streams are perennial.
The consultant for your client has stated as part of the application
that the streams in question are intermittent and "appealed" this
agencies determination.
Until an audit is performed on these stream determinations, the DWQ
maintains that the streams are perennial, and that the project is
subject to an Individual Permit (based on Corps policy, DWQ policy, and
15A INCAC 02H .0501 (c) (1) ). Scheduling is currently underway for this
audit and your client will be notified such that he may comply with 15A
NCAC 02H .0502 (e). Pending this audit, the Division must keep the
project on hold and hold any final Agency decision, pending the outcome
of the audit and an application which reflects this determination.
Irregardless of these actions, nothing should be preventing your client
>from applying for, receiving, and implementing a stream restoration and
wetland restoration plan (under a Nationwide 13/27 and concurrent Water
Quality General Certification (GC3495)) which would restore the physical
characteristics, biological integrity, pattern, profile and dimension of
these resources which are not proposed to be impacted under the proposed
application. Additionally, your client should be aware that lacking
sufficient "avoidance and minimization" for the proposed impacts, he
should be prepared to perform restoration of some or all wetlands and
streams on the subject property, pending the Agency final decision.
Best regards,
Kevin
Mona O'Bryant wrote:
2 of4 8/11/2006 2:55 PM
[Fwd: Re: Outlook Ridge]
Kevin,
Thank you for the information. As you know, the site developer
originally planned to go the IP route and was informed by the Corps
that the streams were intermittent and thus changed course. There is
no intent to be difficult. My client appreciates your willingness to
review this.
Mona O'Bryant
-----Original Message -----
*From:* Kevin Barnett [mailto:[e-mail]]
*Sent:* Wednesday, August 09, 2006 6:53 PM
*To:* Mona O'Bryant
*Subject:* Re: Outlook Ridge
Mrs. OBryant:
The on-site audit of the Agency stream rating sheets has been
scheduled. The applicant will be notified prior to this occuring.
Please make your client aware that this developement is still a
Violation site and that incomplete applications, technical
differences, and appeals of Agency decisions only serve to further
this office's being able to make an Agency decision on the
application.
Best regards,
Kevin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with the requirements
of IRS Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained
in this communication or attachment hereto is not intended or written
to be used and cannot be used for the purpose of avoiding penalties
under the Internal Revenue Code or for promoting, marketing or
recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in
this communication or attachment.
Kevin Barnett - Kevin.Barnettc,,tncmail.net
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Water Quality Section
2090 U.S. 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
3 of4 8/11/20062:55 PM
[Fwd: Re: Outlook Ridge]
IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with the requirements of IRS Circular
230, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication or
attachment hereto is not intended or written to be used and cannot be used for the
purpose of avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or for promoting,
marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in
this communication or attachment.
Re: Outlook Ridge Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Encoding: 7bit
4 of 4 8/11/2006 2:55 PM

Fa-1 F77

Wetland and Natural Resource
Consultants, Inc.

June 21, 2006
Mr. David Baker
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Re: Zephyr Outlook, LLC/Outlook Ridge
Cherokee County, North Carolina
DWQ# NOV-2006-CV-0003
Dear Mr. Baker and Mr. Barnett:
` Mr. Kevin Barnett
NC Division of Water Quality
2090 US Highway 70
Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778
The attached Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) is being submitted on behalf of Mr. Greg
Mitchell with Zephyr Outlook, LLC. On March 27, 2006, Mr. Mitchell received a Notice of Violation
(NOV) from the NC DWQ for the construction of a permanent road crossing and amenity ponds
without permit authorization. Mr. Mitchell is seeking after-the-fact Nationwide 39 permit
authorization and the associated 401 Water Quality Certifications for these impacts. Mr. Mitchell
requests that the NC DWQ modify the existing permit application to reflect the attached
information and provide the Cherokee County Environmental Heath office with a written release
allowing for the reinstatement of all building permits. The written request needs to be sent to the
following address:
Cherokee County Environmental Health
Attn: Mr. Tim Nicholson
180 Hilton Street
Murphy, North Carolina 28906
Impacts have been reduced on-site through the elimination of Pond #3 and associated fill. The
pond is currently being drained. Upon completion of the drainage, approximately 128 linear feet of
fill associated with the dam will be removed. A 30-foot buffer will be planted along the 3 impacted
features and the entire disturbed area with be planted with native grasses to ensure soil stability.
The elimination of Pond #3 will minimize impacts by 0.032 acres of wetland seeps and 272 linear
feet of stream channel. The remaining 2427 linear feet of streams and 0.584 acres of wetlands on
the property will be preserved for use as mitigation credit. A 25-foot vegetated buffer will remain
or be established along both sides of all stream segments. Where possible, a limited disturbance,
25-foot pond buffer will be preserved around the three ponds. Pond buffers will add an additional
1.80 acres of preservation area to the site.
Canton Office
PO Box 882
Canton, NC 28716
828-648-8801
828-648-8802 Fax
wnrinc.com
Newton Office
PO Box 224
Newton, NC 28658
828-465-3035
828-465-3050 Fax
Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions regarding the attached PCN and
restoration plan.
Best regards,
A
OQ Jennifer Robertson
Newton Office Clyde Office
PO Box 224 wnrinc.com 217 Paragon Parkway, #142
Newton, NC 28658 Clyde, NC 28721
828-465-3035 828-627-0051
828-465-3050 Fax [phone] Fax
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1.
H.
Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: ATF NW 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
irk 9 ? ; ??q !
JUN 9 ? 2006
Name: Zephyr Outlook, LLC
Mailing Address: 38058 Daughtery Road t
Zephyrhilis, FL 33540
Telephone Number: 813-505-7483 Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jennifer Robertson
Company Affiliation: Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants
Mailing Address: Post Office Box 882
Canton North Carolina 28716
Telephone Number: 828-648-8801 Fax Number: 828-648-8802
E-mail Address: wnrinc@,,aol.com
Updated 1111/2005
Page 1 of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Outlook Ridge
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 452500534371000
4. Location
County: Cherokee Nearest Town: Murphy
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Outlook Ridge
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Murphy take 64
West to 294 North, following; 294 North approximately 10 miles to River Hill Road, turn
right onto River Hill Road and Outlook Ridge is approximately 3 miles on the left.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.092400 ON 84.153373 °W
6. Property size (acres):
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT Baine Branch
8. River Basin: Hiwassee
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at hqp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/nigps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is primarily undeveloped. Some roads have been
cut in and construction of two ponds has been completed and two other ponds are under
construction. Existing land use in the vicinity is residential and ap-ricultural.
Updated 11/1!2005
Page 2 of 9
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project includes the development of a residential community, including one road
crossing and three amenity ponds. Standard construction and earth-moving. equipment will
be utilized in the construction.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The project purpose is to provide residential
housing and amenities to.a rural area of Cherokee County.
IV. Prior Project history
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. DWQ issued NOV-2006-CV-0003 on March 27, 2006 for violation of
NC water quality standards. The applicant has not other permit history with the Corps or DWQ.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
There are no future permits anticipated for the project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 3 of 9
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Impacts to streams are associated with one road crossing and four dams: one of which is to be
removed and the channel restored to its original condition.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
3 Flooding Forested N adj 0.0083
4 Flooding Forested N adj 0.0104
5 Road Crossing
Replacement Forested N adj 0.0028

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.0215
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: > 1 ac
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial t?
Intermittent. Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
1 UT Baine Br Flooding I 1 261 0.0060
2 UT Baine Br Pipe/Fill I 1 62 0.0014
3 UT Baine Br Flooding I 2 295 0.0135
4 UT Baine Br Pipe/Fill I 2 70 0.0032
7 UT Baine Br Pipe/Fill 1 1.5 65 0.0022
8 UT Baine Br Flooding I 1.5 379 0.0131
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 1132 0.0394
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 4 of 9
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.0394
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.0215
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.0609
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 1132
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation - SEE TABLE
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Impacts have been avoided through the elimination of Pond 93 and the elimination of one
road crossing.
Updated I1/1/2005
Page 5 of 9
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal* Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.htmi.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
SEE COVER LETTER AND IMPACT/MITIGATION SUMMARY SHEET
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at littD://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 9
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) fiends or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? - No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify V Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* I Impact
e.? I Multiplier Required
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 9'
3.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0244, or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Impervious surface will be less than 20%.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sewage will be treated via on-site wastewater systems
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ® No ?
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ® No ?
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
This is a small residential development in close proximity to Murphy, North Carolina. Murphy
will be able to provide residences with necessaa goods and services.
type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Enhancement, or Payment into the
appropriate information as identified
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 9
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
.- aI_
.pplica Agent's Signature Date
signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 1111/2005
Page 9 of 9
i
0
? O
Q
r
0
n
Q
?o
v

Outlook Ridge Channel Impact Summary Sheet
Channel Impact Number
and Classy rcation Impact type Existing Impact
linear eet Existing Impact
cubic yards) Mitigation
Ratio Proposed Mitigation Required
(linear feet)
1 Intermittent Flooding (Pond 1 261 2.42 '/2 to 1 130.5
2 Intermittent Pi e/Fill (Pond 1) 62 0.57 1 to 1 62 -
3 Intermittent Flooding (Pond 2) 295 10.93 %z to 1 147.5
4 Intermittent Pi e/Fill (Pond 2) 70 2.59 1 to 1 70
7 Intermittent Pi e/Fill (Pond 4) 65 2.41 1 to 1 65
8 Intermittent Flooding (Pond 4) 379 14.04 '/2 to 1 189.5
Total Impact to Intermittent Channels
Total Pipe/Fill Impact to Int. Channels
Total Flooding Impact to Int. Channels
1132 32.96
197 5.57
935 27.39
Outlook Ridge Wetland Impact Summary Sheet
664.5
Wetland Impact
Number Impact type Existing Impact
s care eet Existing Impact
acres Mitigation Ratio
Proposed Mitigation
Required acres
3 Flooding (Pond 4) 360 0.0083 '/2 to 1 0.0042
4 Flooding (Pond 4) 453 0.0104 %2 to 1 0.0052
5 Road Crossing 120 0.0028 1 to 1 0.0028
Total Impact to Wetlands 933 0.0215 0.0122
Total Pipe Impact to Wetlands 120 0.0028
Total Flooding Impact to Wetlands 813 0.0187
A6
Project Summary Sheet for the Corps
Owner/Applicant
Name:
Mailing Address:
Phone Number:
Zephyr Outlook LLC
38058 Daughtery Road
Zephyrhills, FL 33540
813-505-7483
Street Address of Project: River Hill Road
Murphy, NC
Nearest Waterway: Baine Branch
River Basin: Hiwassee River Basin
Nearest City: Murphy, NC
County: Cherokee County
Decimal Degree Coordinate 35.092400
Location of Project Site: 84.153373
USGS Quadrangle Name: Farner
May S ??qs
, AL
_A
Wetland and Natural Resource '.
Consultants, Inc.
April 28, 2006
Mr. David Baker
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801
RE: Outlook Ridge Project
Cherokee County, North Carolina
Mr. Baker / Mr. Barnett:
Mr. Kevin Barnett,
NC Division of Water Quality
2090 US Hwy 70
Swannona, NC 28778
Attached please find an After-the-Fact application for a Department of the Army
Individual Permit to construct four ponds on two intermittent unnamed tributaries to
Baine Branch in Cherokee County in association with a residential subdivision. Please
reference NOV-2006-CV-0003 which was issued on March 27, 2006. A copy of this NOV
is included. The proposed ponds will function as fishing/community amenity ponds. The
project area is currently being developed. Data such as Cherokee County tax maps, USGS
topo-quadrangles, and data forms are included for your reference.
There are 325 linear feet of hard impacts associated with the four dams and 1079 linear
feet of flooding. All of the dams are less than 15' in height. The channels on the property
to be impacted by the proposed dams are unnamed tributaries to Baine Branch. These
channels are within the Hiwassee River Basin and are classified by the N.C. Division of
Water Quality as Class °C" (Index No. 1-81) fresh waters with a primary function of
aquatic life and a secondary function of recreation.
Please call me at 828 / 712-9205 with any questions that you may have.
Best regards,
Jennifer Robertson
Canton Office Newton Office
PO Box 882 wnrinc.com PO Box 224
Canton, NC_28716 Newton, NC 28658
828-648-8801 828-465-3035
828-648-8802 Fax [phone] Fax
MARKETING GROUP
FAX NO. : 8137802639 Apr. 24 2006 10:52AM P2
..16
Wetland and Natural Resource K.,x.,?•?.
Consultarlt8, Inc.
MITI .,. ?•????•
Department of the Army _
Wdrrdro on Di$ 3W, Corps of EnginW?
Attn: Ken,blley, Oriel' Regulatory DWon
PO Box 1$90
Wilmington, North Carolina n40a 1890
-and-
NC DMsion of Water Quality
Attn: 0jM1 Karaaly
2321 Qabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, North Carolina 276o4-zso
1, the currant landowner of the property Identified below, hereby auftfte Welland and Natural
Resource ComKftan s, Inc. to act on my behaM as my agent during the 79ceong of perms to
impact WeWds and Waters of the U5 that are ragroated by the Clean Water Act and the
Rivers and Harbors Act
Federal and State agents arse authorized to be on said property when accompanied by Wetland
and Natal Resource Cars tints, Inc. stag.
Wetland and Natural Resource Cora Awns, D-w- is audwrmed to prpvide suppl mental
nfii?ormeocm nneeukd Record: fOrr Permit pr 9 at the request of the Corps or mQ.
Q
Address: r9'.2 S S"A-rR 0 !1 .v E ?r y0 A, Ayr,
Address: >,r •l rs ,! ?/• /!s ? 3ys y l
Footle Number: _ 8 f -l5-a-5"- ?'fl-
Property LxK*n: 1 ROAN Y A„ w ),
Owners Sign:
Date:
Canton Office - --

PQ Box 882 wnrine rorn Newton Office
PO Box 224
Canton, NC 28716 Newton, NC 286x8
828.6484880)
628-648.8802 I= s $284630$,,,
828.46513 Fens

APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-0003
(33 CFR 325) Expires December 31, 2004
The Public burden for this collection of information is sestimated to average 10 hours per response, although the majority of applications should require
5 hours or less. This includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of
information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of Information
Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget,
Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC 20503. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law,
no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control
number. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having
jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection , Research and
Sanctuaries Act, 33 USC 1413, Section 103. Principal Purpose: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application.for a
permit. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies.
Submission of requested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit
be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this
application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted-to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed
activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned.
1. APPLICATION NO. 12. FIELD OFFICE CODE 13. DATE RECEIVED
4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
11TFAoFS RF1 DW TO RF F111 Fn RV APP11rAAM
5. APPLICANT'S NAME S. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (anaamrisnarreauired)
Zephyr Outlook, LLC, Greg Mitchell, Jennifer Robertson, President
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS
5258 Halstead Lane PO Box 882
Zephyr Hills, Florida 33541 Canton, NC 28716
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE 10. AGENT'S PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE
a. Residence 813-505-7483 a. Residence 828-712-9205
b. Business 813-780-9880 I b. Business 828-648-8801
11. STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION _
I hereby authorize, Jennifer Robertson to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and.to
furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application.
See Agent Authorization Form
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE
NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (seek=,crioru.
Outlook Ridge
13. NAME OF WATERBODY. IF KNOWN iifamd-jvm 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS afap#iiceble)
UT's to Baine Branch River Hill Road, Murphy, NC
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Cherokee North Carolina
COUNTY STATE
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN, (seejmmcrionsl _-
Tax Pin: 4525-00-5343-710; See Attached USGS Map
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
See Attached Directions Sheet
ENG FORM 4345, Jul 7 EDITION OF FES 94 IS OBSOLETE. (Proponent: CECW-OR)
18. Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all feetures)
This site is being developed as a residential community with four amenity ponds.
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or propose of the project, see instnxtrorul
The project will provide housing opportunities to the surrounding area and will provide an
increased tax base to Cherokee County.
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
Construction of Four Small Dams and One Road Crossing
21. Type(s) of Material Beina Discharged and the Amount of Each Tvoe in Cubic Yards
Pipe/Fill for Dam Construction: 6.76 cubic yards streams
Flooding: 28.72 cubic yards streams
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled /see instructions)
Estimated to be 0.12 acres of streams and wetlands piped, filled, and flooded
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes = No IF YES. DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
Two of the ponds are complete and the hard impacts and some of the flooding impacts have been
completed for the other two ponds. The road crossing has also been installed.
24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (If more than can be entered here,
please attach a supplemental list).
See Attached List
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL' IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
i
i
Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building and flood plain permits
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this
application is complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the
duly authorized agent of the applicant.
-a9- 0?
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNA E OF AGENT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $ 10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
1
OUTLOOK RIbGE ADJACENT
PROPERTY OWNERS
LEDFORD PHILLIPS & ANNETTE H
700 LIBERTY LANE
MURPHY, NC 28906
HAMBY RUBY D
4430 LAMBURT DRIVE
KENNESAW, GA 30144
JANOSKO ROBERT F & PHYLLIS C
2800 RIVERHILL ROAD
MURPHY, NC 28906
OTWELL DWIGHT LEWIS & LACHARITE-
OTWELL SUSAN
PO BOX 873
MURPHY, NC 28906
REED ROBERT L & BRENDA S
2935 RIVERHILL ROAD
MURPHY, NC 28906
RAPHAEL ROBIN TERRY
19516 CRESCENT ROAD
ODESSA, FL 33556
1
t
RAPER M T (Heirs)
RT 1 BOX 278
TURTLETOWN, TN 37391
JAMES BROTHERS ENTERPRISES INC
5 BEACHWAY NORTH
OCEAN RIDGE, FL 33435
PHILLIPS WAYNE H & GAY M
256 PRESIDENT STREET
DUNEDIN, FL 34698
APALACHIA FARM INC
PO BOX 1449
ANDREWS, NC 28901-1449
2

,
w ,

Cl r? _ N ?i. N 1 H A L 'A
/ ,\ I 1 if
i F ?0 R `E S' T C J 'ti
_ ?a a l f? 'ASS' ? 1 I w p?lZ? f
x?- f ?? ? ? '°' r? ? i vpKE - ? I "????L I S<' ???, /??? ??? Ss ; y
, 01
?`
/..SrVj?-?1 o I I /,l.?J?, >J?J~u
17
ly < e t ?+ d d\ ?lC?rG ?ct 1 n S1 1
1 6 /,
y ,.
` .Il ,w - .3 H CY 4,,' D.:R F 1•r -.. euc rc b?.v ?i / 3)r 1'a - "? \ t_. \
Ix
W4i- v _ Tli J .t
! r`? ?^?' r r J / fr:iloJ s? u?`f7 ?$ ?IJ
H1W
4°W
-- ^'- ? ? FWm un Pry , ? r
o

r

Y ? C i 1/a
Name: FARNER Location: 035009'24.0" N 084° 15' 33.73" W
Date: 4/13/2006 Caption: Zephyr Outlook, LLC
Scale: 1 inch equals 4000 feet Outlook Ridge
WNR Job # ZOL-1000

OUTLOOK RIDGE
Zephyr Outlook, LLC
Murphy, Cherokee County, NC
Cherokee County, NC ArcIMS Viewer
• .a
Page 1 of 1
01121 Cherokee County, NC ArcIMS Viewer
i
Layers
f
Visible Active
F r?N4 F r, Parcels
[ C County Boundary
F C' Cities
Roads i
-k ?...?" _..T . r r Streams
C 20ft Contours i
Al.
C Watersheds
C r Voting Districts
C School Districts
[ G Census Blocks 2000
F USGS Topo j
r Aerial Phntne 1997
Aerial Photos 2004
Refresh Map
/•
Search
Register of Deeds
ONLINE
Search
Property Cards
ONLINE
Pan
Parcels
Rec NEWPIN ACCOUNT_NU MISc1 MISC2 LAND_UNITS DEE
1 452500534371000 000000011349 MCHAN/RAPER 1079/463/466 9.81AC 200:
?I
i
http://65.14.20.19/viewer.htm 4/13/2006
Cherokee County, NC ArcIMS Viewer
Page 1 of 1

Search
Register of Deeds
ONLINE
Search
Property Cards
ONLINE
Parcels
Rec NEWPIN ACCOUNT_NU MISCt MISC2 LAND_UNITS DEE
1 452500833788000 000000018892 OUTLOOK RIDGE 1183/559 96.50AC 200E

Identify
http://65.14.20.19/viewer.htm 4/13/2006
t
Project Purpose and Need
Mr. Greg Mitchell of Zephyr Outlook LLC, the project proponent, has
constructed four ponds and one road crossing associated with the
development of a residential subdivision, known as Outlook Ridge, and
amenities in Cherokee County, North Carolina. The ponds will be stocked and
used as the main amenities for the development. Mr. Mitchell was told that
as long as the dams he constructed were less than 15' in height, he did not
need any permits. Mr. Mitchell was unaware of the regulations requiring him
to obtain permits prior to construction.
Outlook Ridge will generate an increase in the tax base for Cherokee County.
It will provide jobs on a local, regional, and statewide level. Waterfront lots
and lots with a view of water can provide double the revenue, compared to an
equivalent lot that does not have such an amenity.
Channels on the property include Baine Branch and its unnamed tributaries.
These channels are within the Hiawassee River Basin and are classified by
the N.C. Division of Water Quality as class "C" waters. Class "C" waters are
defined as "freshwaters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, aquatic
life including propagation and survival, and wildlife." The subject streams
have been assessed using the Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet
(USACE Wilmington, Version 06/03).
The attached Impact Summary Table for Streams and Wetlands categorizes
each stream segment, indicates the length of stream impacts, cubic yards of
wetlands impacted, the proposed mitigation ratio, and the required
mitigation. The mitigation ratios are based on Stream Quality Assessment
Worksheets and the ratios set forth in the Stream Mitigation Guidelines.
Alternatives Analysis
Development of the property is well underway. The majority of the roads
are in place. Two of the ponds have been completed and the other two are
close to completion. The developer has advertised waterfront lots and has
proceeded to sell lots, as such, around all four ponds. He has also marketed
and sold lots with the intention that those lots will have the ponds. in there
view-shed.
1
K
The site is quite suitable for this type of development to be done. There
are two distinct valleys on the property in which two ponds have been
constructed in each valley. The impacted streams are intermittent.
Avoidance and Minimization
The proponent considered alternative development concepts and determined
that the uniqueness of the current proposal provided the best potential for
success. There was an, additional stream impact proposed before WNR got
involved with the project. That stream crossing has now been eliminated and
a cul-de-sac will be used instead.
Mitigation Proposal
Please review the Impact Summary Tables and the Mitigation Tables in
conjunction with the information below while considering the mitigation
proposal. The construction of the ponds has created perennial streams with
constant flow below the ponds.
Streams:
On-Site Preservation:
Approximately 2,155 linear feet of streams on site will be preserved for
mitigation credit. Please see the attached Mitigation Map for a location of
the preservation on site. A 25-foot vegetated buffer will remain or will be
established along both sides of all stream segments.
Pond Buffers:
Where possible a limited disturbance pond buffer of 25 feet will be
preserved along the shorelines of the ponds.
Wetlands:
On-Site Preservation:
Approximately .552 acres of wetland will be preserved on site.
2

Outlook Ridge Channel Impact Summary Sheet
Channel Impact Number
and Classification Impact type Existing Impact
linear eet Existing Impact
cubic yards) Mitigation
Ratio Proposed Mitigation Proposed
linear eet
1 Intermittent Flooding (Pond 1) 261 2.42 '/2 to 1 130.5
2 Intermittent Pi e/Fill (Pond 1) 62 0.57 1 to 1 62
3 Intermittent Flooding (Pond 2) 295 10.93 '/2 to 1 147.5
4 Intermittent Pipe/Fill (Pond 2) 70 2.59 1 to 1 70
5 Intermittent Fill (Pond 3) 128 1.19 1 to 1 128
6 Intermittent Flooding (Pond 3) 144 1.33 '/2 to 1 72
7 Intermittent Pi e/Fill (Pond 4) 65 2.41 1 to 1 65
8 Intermittent Flooding (Pond 4) 379 14.04 '/2 to 1 189.5
Total Impact to Intermittent Channels
Total Pipe/Fill Impact to Int. Channels
Total Flooding Impact to Int. Channels
1404 35.48
325 6.76
1079 28.72
Outlook Ridge Wetland Impact Summary Sheet
864.5
Wetland Impact
Number Impact type Existing Impact
(s uare eet Existing Impact
acres Mitigation Ratio
Proposed Mitigation
Proposed acres
1 Flooding (Pond 3) 585 0.0134 '/2 to 1 0.0067
2 Flooding (Pond 3) 801 0.0184 '/2 to 1 0.0092
3 Flooding (Pond 4) 360 0.0083 '/2 to 1 0.0042
4 Flooding (Pond 4) 453 0.0104 '/2 to 1 0.0052
5 Road Crossing 120 0.0028 1 to 1 0.0028
Total Impact to Wetlands 2319 0.0533 0.0281
Total Pipe Impact to Wetlands 120 0.0028
Total Flooding Impact to Wetlands 2199 0.0505
Outlook Ridge On-Site Stream Mitigation Proposal
Channel Classification Channel Length
linear feet) Mitigation Credit Ratio
Preservation Stream Mitigation
Proposed Preservation
1 Intermittent 85 5 to 1 17
2 Perennial with Pond 230 2 to 1 115
3 Perennial with Pond 620 2 to 1 310
4 Intermittent 260 5 to 1 52
5 Perennial 700 2 to 1 350
6 Perennial with Pond 200 5 to 1 40
7 Intermittent 60 5 to 1 12
Total Channel Mitigation 2155
896
Outlook Ridge On-Site Wetland Mitigation Proposal
Wetland Type Wetland Area (acres) Mitigation Credit Ratio
Preservation Wetland Mitigation Proposed
Preservation
1 Linear Wetland 0.004 5 to 1 0.0008
2 Linear Wetland 0.026 5 to 1 0.0052
3 Linear Wetland See 0.012 5 to 1 0.0024
1 Vegetated Wetland 0.14 2 to 1 0.07
2 Vegetated Wetland 0.37 2 to 1 0.185
Total Wetland Mitigation 0.552 0.2634
t f
NC DENR - DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
.0302 HIWASSEE RIVER BASIN
2B .0300
Classification
Name of Stream Description Class Date Index No.
Bryson Branch From source to Beaverdam C;Tr 07/01/73 1-72-5
Creek
Bryson Creek From source to Beaverdam C;Tr 07/01/73 1-72-6
Creek
Moccasin Creek From source to Hiwassee Lake C;Tr 07/01/73 1-73
HIWASSEE RIVER (Apalachia From Hiwassee Dam to River C 07/01/61 1-(74)
Lake below elevation 1281) Mile 75, 0.8 mile downstream
from Hiwassee Dam at
Hiwassee Reservation
Boundary
HIWASSEE RIVER (Apalachia From River Mile 75, 0.8 mile B 09/01/74 1-(75)
Lake below elevation 1281) downstream from Hiwassee Dam
at Hiwassee Reservation
Boundary to Apalachia Dam
Anderson Creek From source to Apalachia C;Tr 07/01/73 1-76
Lake
South Shoal Creek From source to Apalachia C;Tr 07/01/73 1-77
Lake
Allen Branch From source to South Shoal C 07/01/61 1-77-1
Creek
Thompson Branch From source to South Shoal C 07/01/61 1-77-2
Creek
Quinn Creek From source to South Shoal C;Tr 07/01/73 1-77-3
Creek
Little Shoal Creek From source to Apalachia C;Tr 07/01/73 1-78
Lake
Beavers Branch From source to Apalachia C 07/01/61 1-79
Lake
North Shoal Creek From source to Apalachia C 07/01/61 1-80
Lake
Potter Branch From source to North Shoal C 07/01/61 1-80-1
Creek
Baine Branch From source to Apalachia C 07/01/61 1-81
Lake
Camp Creek From source to Apalachia C 07/01/61 1-82
Lake
Adams Branch From source to Apalachia C 07/01/61 1-83
Lake
Laurel Branch From North C;Tr 07/01/73 1-84
Carolina-Tennessee State
Line to Apalachia Lake
HIWASSEE RIVER From Apalachia Dam to C 07/01/61 1-(85)
North Carolina-Tennessee
State Line
Shuler Creek From source to Hiwassee C 07/01/61 1-86
River
Bear Branch From source to Shuler Creek C 07/01/61 1-86-1
Floyde Branch From source to Shuler Creek C;Tr 07/01/73 1-86-2
16
j`,` r,-
L
Cam
n
. n
i. jP
r e
a
Jf _
,r
s r
r
Ponda-
';o Id 3
- 1 Seam Farm 3
M4St;eam Form t
17
?L,dJ? qtr 1 y' y,C' 1?-y, •i.
?? `?'• iii _ -? ?? r?
i
.? sr 4.i 'j1 ?? ) ? f
?
• ddd!
. '
lei
s
•
?.> r
MAY
tit DENfi - WA .Qt1-LITY _ -,
?_ - Y&TCANDSAND
4°W
Name: FARNER Location: 035° 09' 24.28" N 084'15'35.34" W
Date: 5/1/2006 Caption: Zephyr Outlook, LLC
Scale: 1 inch equals 667 feet Outlook Ridge - Stream Forms
WNR Job # ZOL-1000
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
i : STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET`
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Greg _Mitchell 2. Evaluator's name: Yelverton. Robertson
3. Date of evaluation: 4/17/2006 4. Time of evaluation: mid-day
5. Name of stream: Stream above pond 1 6. River basin: Hiwassee
7. Approximate drainage area: 23 ac. S. Stream order: first
9. Length of reach evaluated: 50 feet 10. County: Cherokee
11. Site coordinates (if known):035.09240N / 084.153373 W 12. Subdivision name (if any):_Outlook Ride
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
#1 (see attached map)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): pond
15. Recent weather conditions: mild and dry
16. Site conditions at time of visit: mild and
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: []Section 10 []Tidal Waters []Essential Fisheries Habitat
[]Trout Waters []Outstanding Resource Waters [] Nutrient Sensitive Waters DWater Supply Watershed _ (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES[] NOE If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES? NOE
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES[] NOE
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
30% Forested 70% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: V 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): V
24. Channel slope down center of stream: 0Flat (0 to 2%) []Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) []Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: []Straight Occasional bends []Frequent meander []Very sinuous []Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 23 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature aaj.4? za&2?9n Date 4/17/2006
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
# RE
SC
CHARACTERISTICS O
Coastal' Piedmont.- Mountain
000 Presence of flow / persistent: pools in stream 0-5 0-4 0-5 1
01 no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max pints

2 Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
1
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max pints

3 Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
1
no buffer= 0; conti pus; wide buffer = max pints

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5 '
0-4
0-4
3
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
a
5 Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
1
d no discharge = 0• springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
0
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max points)

7 Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
0
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points) 1

8 Presence of adjacent wetlands

j
0 6
-

0-4

0-2

0
no wetlands = 0• large ad
acent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0 - 5 0-4 0-3 1
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input- 0-5 0-4 0-4 2
extensive deposition-- 0; little or no sediment = max points)

11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
1
fine homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max pints

12 Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0 -3
2
y+ (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)

13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
1
a severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
d
14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
2
E-r+ no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max pints

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
0
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)

16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-1
0-5
0-6
0
no riffles/ripples les or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)

17 Habitat complexity 0-6 0-6 0-6 1
little or no habitat= 0; frequent, varied habitats = max pints
Q
18 Canopy coverage over streambed
=
0-5
0-5
0-5
1
x no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy
max points)
"
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 2
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
1
no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max points)

21 Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
1
O no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)

22 Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
p no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 1
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 23
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
USACE AID#
DWQ#,
Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET'
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Gre Mitchell 2. Evaluator's name: Yelverton, Robertson
3. Date of evaluation: 4/17/2006
5. Name of stream: Stream below pond 4
7. Approximate drainage area: 80 ac.
9. Length of reach evaluated: 50 feet
11. Site coordinates (if known):035.09240N / 084.153373 W
4. Time of evaluation: mid-day
6. River basin: Hiwassee
8. Stream order: first
10. County: Cherokee
12. Subdivision name (if any): Outlook Ride
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):-
42 (see attached map)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Pond and dam
15. Recent weather conditions: mild and dry
16. Site conditions at time of visit: mild and dry
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: DSection 10 DTidal Waters IIEssential Fisheries Habitat
L1Trout Waters IIOutstanding Resource Waters II Nutrient Sensitive Waters DWater Supply Watershed _ (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES® NOD If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES? NOE
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES? NO®
21. Estimated watershed land use: Residential _% Commercial Industrial _% Agricultural
30% Forested 70% Cleared / Logged _% Other
22. Bankfull width: V 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: IIFlat (0 to 2%) IRGentle (2 to 4%) DModerate (4 to 10%) ?Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: nStraight ElOccasional bends L]Frequent meander ?Very sinuous IIBraided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 23 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature U AiAA &&66? Date 4/17/2006
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
SCORE
# CHARACTERISTICS
Coastal Piedmont Mountain
000 Presence of flow/ persistent pools in stream 0-5 0-4 0-5 1
01 no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 0
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 0
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 - 2
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
a 5 Groundwater discharge. 0-3 0-4 0-4 2
d no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0-4 0-4 0-2 0
no flood" lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max points)
,x Entrenchment / floodplain access 0-5 - 0-4 - 0-2 0
a (deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max oints
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands -
j 0-6 0-4 0-2 _ 2
acent wetlands = max points)
no wetlands= 0 large ad
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 1
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment. input 0- 5 4- 4 0- 4 1
extensive deposition-- 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0-5, 1
fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 1
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)

13 Presence of major bank failures 0-5 0-5 0 -5 1
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
0: 14 Root depth and density on banks
0 - 3
0 - 4
0 - 5
1
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points
r15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 0-5 0-4 0-5 1
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 0
no riffles/riles or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
F
Q
17 Habitat complexity 0-6 0-6 0-6 1
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max oints
d l8 Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
1
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
x
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 1
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
1
no evidence = 0• common, numerous types = max points)

21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 3
C no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
*4
22 Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
1
no evidence = 0• common, numerous types = max oints
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 1
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)

Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 23
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET .
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Greg Mitchell 2. Evaluator's name: Yelverton. Robertson
3. Date of evaluation: 04/17/2006 4. Time of evaluation: mid-day
5. Name of stream: Connection between ponds 1 & 2 6. River basin: Hiwassee
7. Approximate drainage area: 17 ac. 8. Stream order: first
9. Length of reach evaluated: 50 feet 10. County: Cherokee
11. Site coordinates (if known): 035.09240N / 084.153373 W 12. Subdivision name (if any): Outlook Ridge
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):_
43 (see attached map)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Ponds and dams above and below evaluated reach
15. Recent weather conditions: mild and dry
16. Site conditions at time of visit: mild and
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: ?Section 10 ?Tidal Waters ?Essential Fisheries Habitat
IITrout Waters ?Outstanding Resource Waters ? Nutrient Sensitive Waters ?Water Supply Watershed_ (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES® NOD If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES? NOE
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES[] NO®
21. Estimated watershed land use: Residential _% Commercial Industrial Agricultural
30% Forested 70% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 4' 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 4'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ?Flat (0 to 2%) ?Gentle (2 to 4%) E Moderate (4 to 10%) ?Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: tKStraight ElOccasional bends []Frequent meander []Very sinuous []Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 31 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Lc?( Z29=s Date 4/17/2006
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
SCORE
# CHARACTERISTICS
Coastal Piedmont Mountain
000 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0-5 0-4 0-5 3
01 no flow or saturation = 0; strop flow= max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 1
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration= max points)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 1
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max oints
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0- 5 0-4 0-4 3
extensive dischar es = 0; no discharges = max points)
a
5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0- 4 0- 4 2
Q no discharge = 0; springs, see s; wetlands etc. = max points)
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0_ 4 0- 4 0- 2 0
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max points)
Entrenchment / fioodplain access 0-5 0- 4 0- 2 0
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points) 1
8 Presence. of adjacent, wetlands
j 0-6 0-2 0
acent wetlands = max points)
no wetlands = 0;1 a ad
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 2
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander= max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 1
extensive deposition-- 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0-5 1
fine, homo enous = 0; lar e; diverse sizes =. max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 1
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)

13 Presence of major bank failures 0-5 _ 0-5 0-5 1
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
Q 14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
2
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 0-5 0-4 0-5 - 3
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 1
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
F
et
17 Habitat complexity 0-6 0-6 0-6 2
E? little or no habitat = 0• frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0 - :5:
0 - 5
0 - 5
2
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points
x

19 Substrate embeddeduess NA* 0- 4 0- 4 1
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5 1
no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max points)

21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 1
O no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max oints

22 Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
1
q no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 1
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL. SCORE (also enter on first page) 31
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
USACE AID#
DWQ#
Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
=s`yN t
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Greg Mitchell 2. Evaluator's name: Yelverton. Robertson
3. Date of evaluation: 4/17/2006 4. Time of evaluation: mid-day
5. Name of stream: Stream below pond 2 6. River basin: Hiwassee
7. Approximate drainage area: 43 ac. 8. Stream order: first
9. Length of reach evaluated: 50 feet 10. County: Cherokee
11. Site coordinates (if known):035.09240N / 084.153373 W 12. Subdivision name (if any): Outlook Ridge
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):-
44_(below pond 2)
14. Proposed channel work (if any): pond and dam
15. Recent weather conditions: mild and drv
16. Site conditions at time of visit: mild and
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: IISection 10 IITidal Waters ?Essential Fisheries Habitat
QTrout Waters DOutstanding Resource Waters Q Nutrient Sensitive Waters [1Water Supply Watershed _ (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES® NO[] If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES? NO®
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES? NOO
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential _% Commercial Industrial _% Agricultural
30% Forested 70% Cleared / Logged Other (
22. Bankfull width: 2' 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: IIFlat (0 to 2%) IIGentle (2 to 4%) IIModerate (4 to 10%) IISteep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: F 1Straight IIOccasional bends Frequent meander IIVery sinuous LDraided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 38 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature 41AP, 44- Date 4/17/2006
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
# C
HARACTERISTICS SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain
000 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0-5 0-4 0-5 2
01 no flow or saturation = 0; strop flow = max points)

2 Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
2
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 o-4 0-5 2
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points),

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
2
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)

5 Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
2
U no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
p
0-4
0-4
0-2
0
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max
oints

7 Entrenchment L floodplain access
0-5
' 0-4
0-2
0
(deeply entrenched= 0; frequent floodin= max points)

8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j
0-6
0-4
0-2
1
no wetlands = 0; large ad
acent wetlands = max oints

9 Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
1
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)

10 Sediment input
_
0-5
0-4
0-4
2
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)

11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
2
fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max oints

12 Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
2
>0 (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)

13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
" 0-5
2
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
d
14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5 "
2
E-+ no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
2
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points) 1

16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
0
no dffles/riles or pools.= 0; well-developed = max points)
Q 1 Habitat complexity 0-6 0-6 0-6 2
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5 -
0-5
0-5
2
h„ no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 2
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max ,

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
1
no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max points)

21 Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
1
O no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
O 22 Presence of fish 0-4 0-4 0-4 1
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 1
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL -SCORE (also enter on first page) 34
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

Stream Form Location #4 - Stream below Pond 2
Stream Form Location #2 - Stream below Pond 4
Stream Form Location #3 - Stream between Ponds 1 & 2
Stream Form Location #I - Stream above Pond 1
Pond 1
Pond 2

Pond 4 looking upslope at young pine forest and road cut
Pond 4 looking upstream at Pond 3
4 ?
Delineation Performed by: Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc.
P.O. Box 882, Canton, NC 28716
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Wetland Data Form - Routine Wetland Determination
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Outlook Ridge Date: 4/17/2006
Applicant / Owner: Greg Mitchell County: Cherokee
Investigator: Yelverton, Robertson State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ? No ® Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes[-] No TransectID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ? No ® Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum
1. Juncus effusus FACW+ herb 9. Alnus seaulata FACW+ tree
2. Comus amomum FACW+ tree 10. Acer rubrum FAC tree
3. Salix nigra OBL tree 11.
4. Carex spp FACW herb 12.
5. Sambucus canadensis FACW- shrub 13.
6. Scitpus cyperinus OBL herb 14.
7. Vemonia gigantea FAC+ shrub 15.
8. Eupatoriadelphus fistulosus FAC+ shrub 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 100%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
? Other ® Inundated
® Saturated in Upper 12"
? No Recorded Data Available ® Water Marks
® Drift Lines
Field Observations: ® Sediment Deposits
® Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 12" (in.) Secondary Indicators:
® Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0" in.
) ® Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0' (in.) ® FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
r ?: a
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Nikwasi fine sandy loam Drainage Class: Poorly drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Cumulic Humag uepts Confirm Mapped Type? Yes El No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0=4 AP 10YR 3/2 / sandy loam
4-14 A2 10YR 4/1 / sandy loam
14-24 C 10YR 4/2 / sand w/ gravel

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
® Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
® Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ?
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ® No ?
Remarks:
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes ® No ?
Apr 1 1 06 01:19p D.B. Kruger
0410312029 12.59 81392138286
`oaaF WAtE9pG
? y
O ?
March 27.2006
CERMED MAiL -'-
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 7005 0390 ON13552 91.11
Mr. Greg Mitchell and Ms. Patricia Roche
Zephyr Outlook, LLC
5157 Epping Lane
Zephyrhills, Florida 33541
Dear Mr. Mitchell and Ms. Roche:
828-389-3609 p.2
PARAMUUN I PAIN r tM NACat bl
midmel F. rmjcy. Goventor
William C,. Ross Jr., Sammy
Noah Carollrss UgMrt7ltent of FAvirmmcnt teed Natural Rosotom
Alan W. K imdGP.E Dircanr
Drvisttm ofWner Qnaiity
Subject: Notice of Vwtation and Recommendation for
Enforcement
WN-2006-CV-0003
401 Certiftcstion.and Wafer Quality Violations
Outlook Ridge Subdivision
Cherokee County
On Marsh 16, 2006 Kerry Becker of the Division of Water Quality's Asheville Regional Office inspected the
Outlook Ridge Subdivision construction site located on River Hill Rd, west of Murphy. North Carolina. Based upon her
observations of the site and upon analytical results of stream samples collected for turbidity, inadequate sedimentation
and erosion control measures had resulted in the discharge of sediment laden Mormwater into three Unnamed Tributaries
(UT) to the Camp Creek. In addition, inappropriate grading activities had resulted in the destruction of the stream
channels and buffer areas of large segments of these same Unnamed Tributaries. The Unnamed Tributaries are classified
as Class C waters. Additionally, a small headwaters wetland adjacent to one of the Unnamed Tributaries had been
dredged and filed and sediment loss to the headwaters of a larger wetland area below the project had occurred. The
violations were for removal of best rasa, violation of the-settleable solids standard, failure to secure 401 water guar
certifications and 0lacharge of storntwater without having secured the required hermit.
Loss of Best Usage - Sediment from land disturbing activities had entered three Unnamed Tributaries to Camp
Creek in sufficient quantity to make the streams unsuitable for aoustic Ilre and wildlife habitat and maintenance. The
quantity of sediment in these streams Constituted each a violation of the water quality standard for loss of best use. The
best usage standard is defined !n Ttfe 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 28.0211 (1).
Dredging and filling of a headwater wetland of one of the Unnamed Tributaries to Camp Creels rendered the wetland
unsuitable for wetland-dependent aquatic life and wetland-dependent wildfire. This constituted a violation of the wetland
standard for best usage as defined In Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 26.12231(a).
Settleable Solids Standard Violation - Excessive ac cumutatlons of sediment occurred in the stream channels of
the three Unnamed Tributaries to Camp Creek in sufficient quantity to make the streams unsuitable for aquatic life and
wildlife. The deposition of sediment into these streams constituted each a violation of the settleable solids water quality
standard as defined in Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 28.0211(3)(c).
Sufficient fill of a headwater wetland of one of the Unnamed Tributaries to Camp Creek adversely imparted the wetland
rendering it unsuitable for vuetland-dependent aquatic life and wetland-dependent wildlife. This constituted a violation of
the wetlands standard for filling as defined in True 1 SA NCAC 28.0231(b)(1).
Faikme to Secure 401 Water Quality Certifications - Title 15A North Carolina, Administrative Code 21-11.0500
requires that anyone proposing to engage in dredge or tall activities first secure certification from the Division of Water
Quality. Fill material was placed in a headwater wetland of one of the Unnamed Tributaries to Camp Creels. This
constituted filling in violation of 15A NCAC 2H. 05D0. Using fill material and three culverts to create three impoundments
in the stream channels of the Unnamed Tributaries constituted additional violations of 15A NCAC 21-1.0500.
N
Nnnh CmvJin& VMsian of Watt Qudity 2090 US. Highway 70 Swanm ma. NC 7.3778 Phone [phone] Cudg mcr Savi=
inwmat wwwjcvwA qu",ctrg FAX [phone] )-877.623-6744
AA ElFill t7pPMuniWAH amore Actim EmMyw-50% Rec/cledJ10%Po111 CMSlrner Ptgwr
A,)rj 11 06 01:20p D.B. Kruger
;0419312006 12'53 8139208286
Mr. Greg Mitchell and Ms. Patricia Roche
March 27, 2006
Page Two
828-389-3609 p.3
PARAM01.04T• PAINTING PAGE 92
Discharge without a permit -- Stormwater associated with construction and grading activities at the Outlook Ridge
development resulted in the transport of sufficient materials Into three Unnamed Tributaries to Camp Creek to cause
violations of water quality standards. North Carolina General Statutes 143-215.1 requires issuance of a permit prior to the
discharge of pollution to state waters. Failure to obtain this permit is a violation of that statute. No permits for a discharge
to the Unnnamed Tributaries to Camp Creek had been issued by the Dept, of Environment and Natural Resources.
You should be aware that filling of wetlands and streams. placement of cuhrerts and the creation of
impoundments within streams require permitting by the U. S. Angry Corps of Engineers. By copy of this letter we are
informing them of the activities occurring at your site and advise you to Immediately contact them at their regional office in
Asheville, North Carolina at 828-271-7980.
You mast perfomr the fallowing in order to bring this project back lift compliance with His N. C. General
Statutes and Administrative Code:
No further culverting, filling or impounding of the Unnamed Tributaries to Camp Creek may occur without first applying
for and receiving the appropriate permit from the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers and a Water Quality Certification
from the N. C. Division of Water Quality for all of the impacts on this site.
• You must utilize all appropriate sediment and erosion control measures to preserve water quality at pre-construction
conditions on the site. This may include, at a minimum, removal of excavated material, seeding with grass and the
installation of silt screens and off-stream sediment basins.
• Should you choose not to permit these activities, you must submit a restoration plan to this office which would provide
for the re-establishment of the natural stream channels, stream banks and riparian buffer areas of the Unnamed
Tributaries to Camp Creek without further causing downstream turbidity issues. The stream banks must be
restructured (length: freight) and the newly established slope then planted in accordance with the attached Riparian
Butter Restoration Guidance. The restoration plan must include a discussion of channel stabffq upon removal of fill
material and sediment management as to protect the down strearn resources.
By copy of this document to the Cherokee County Managers Office, the Division of Water Quality is requesting
that all county permits be held until such a time that this site is brought back Into compliance with all appropriate state
rubes and regulations,
If you have an explanation for the above-described violations that you wish to present, please respond in writing
to me within ten (10) days following receipt of this Notice. Your explanation will be reviewed and if an enforcement action
is still deemed appropriate, your explanation will be fonmrded to the Director with the enforcement package for his
consideration. If you should have any questions, please contact Kerry Becker at 828-296.4500.
Sincerely,
CC: U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
David Badger, Cherokee County Manager
Silas Allen, Cherokee Co. Building Inspections
Elaine Russell, Cherokee Co. Health Dept
Enforcement Unit
Charles Koontz, Division of Land Resources
Roger C. Edwards. Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
i
i s
E r e
f
i./~"" ~,'~.r~1e' ,H'i's' t!tdt~~'S5 0~"rfkte~r?S'e3
~ ~ _ , CG~~JIr~~ ~ a J
j8f Or~~ld P1~N;~ t~r I 1 i
t
~ , ~ ~ ~ ER ~ ~
n13~'..~~_~E~'~s~ ~t1t11V.9 ~ ~ , {
s 'ti 1 :4 tY a,~• ~ - ~
r' $
i / I((S
~~~u~~. J
~ ~ v s ~ . r't I
E
f }
i
I 9
I
i
i s
i
I
a ~ s ~ 6. ! ~ ~ a s~.,
~ ,~a,t, ~ ~ _ .r.,
1 ,
~ " . ~ .a=p r!" .,5a p~
" I
e'r {
~3 ~i€ ~j' ~ `~f e i
?'3 ' J' r ~ ~ ;i l
1. 3.~ i' <k~;,~'}~' ~ tl -
. x I ...''~~'4 1 Qd h,:': .i
i2 IV uil os"W Gs.b3' L- 12 N K4° '5U"W 2"
L-13 N 10°93'01"11 26.84' S4 x.12' ° ~ L-13 N 53°42'34"t/ 61.14' L-14 N ~9 l ~ DO E 59.64'
' - 4~~ , ~a. L~ ~1 67°22' ~7"~' 24.15'
~ ~ . ~~~ti 2~.~30'
' < ~ ZEPHYR OUTLDOX LLC. ~E~~ ~ ITLDOK LLC.
' ' , " ~d DB-1183 PG-559 a G id ~ 5130' ~ i"~ 5b.47' J IV Gt1 1.~ 1 1 YY ~ l 3 PG-559
ut~ . .r, t"s ~~F .
~ r, '1." 1~ ~F.~,24,
qq ~ .4J 17 v td - -
..,,'s I s~~;,49' - " ao. ~ ~i 4
v 57 ,
, , ~ , ~ ' . f31 ~9 ~ .23' ~
\
% _ i ` ~
,.t --fl ~ ~
~ ! ~/x1 ~ { c/ j ,
iJ n ~ `25 ` ~'e ~
/ / ,f
.
` \ ,.,1 q
DF~-1183 PG-559 ~3°29'-- ~ r~ ~ ~ ~
1 329.63' , ~ ~i w _~y _ ~
1 ~ y
m. kiaN~l t~ _ - ~ ~L~ 1, f
.a ~ , ~i o ~ J;
~ ~ _ i ~ _ ~.,xr _ ~ i'+
r~ f s . ~ r°,
d r u~ e...! ~ . r~~~
i u , ~ . ~2 . s s~ x~. , - - ~ ~
g r ;._t ~ ~ U1 ' a Q 't7 , x _ , / q..~~ SQ'~ "r 019
ru ~ ti ' `3 ~22 i
r t5

, ~ CMG ,r` ~ !
- Iasi ~ v '1•,:
I ~ ~ C ~r ~ti© 1.63' ~
~ D~, ~1
1.~74~c. "'~Y I S
~ 1`" r ~ . ~ fit, . ~ ~ 1
4~' S ~~r2 t
~ c~ ~ ~ - y~ rJ 54,J
~ . V ~ W lJ . rV a~0 1 ~ Q F.:
.fit," ~ ~ ~ ~ lAJU ~
~ .~yy S ,~~o~ ' ~ "
f ~ it ;~4>/~Q ~ ~ r~ 8~"~1, t, `.~_n_ ~....r..__.a_-~----~ _ ,
10 ~ ~Y TX.~S TfJ PFt.~Y1071S Sr;1zi~~"fir
' ~
. ? ~ ~ o
/_ti 38.75:- f
ti' ~ ~ v ~I
t',A~ N' S5°a~ ~7 35.8 -9a ~
' ~J'~' ~ D~~ ~ -i`` ~ ~1 t"~ . d 0~.~ a , L-14 / / L-13
t s! ~ /
r { -
1 9 ~ ~ rr d t F ' _ ~ A~EGG ~'~~~'J ~ g
~ ~ y..~ '~J ~ ~ ~ t. . ' ~f ~ ~ i ~ a
r _ ~~,~1 ~ ~ ~ ~~r;~r~z~~~ ear. r~r~;~~~ ;_s_r• I
,b ~ z yl i~ ! , .LJl/1 1t i tY V V e i.,v vyx .aux."~i.
cr x~~-1183 PG-55.3 a, ~ ~ ~ ; ,
E, 'r
x, . ~ ~ ~ ~
~3a~ . ,z ~a ~,d ,
xiw i - ~ ~''G` z.,, 7'tsl~vt,`'
-3a~ 4 ,~,j ,i.,, ,
~ E` , ~ 1= ' , ~ '~'g1> C,~( 1fA~~Y~ i;E'~t~'TA1~Y ROA,D`~ Tr°~ ,
i ,.u,i' 11°2~s'1f~"E ;10.25:. 1
~t rV ~ r
„ . . ° ~ „
1V 22°,a43,:~°~W 28.'00' `~1
1'' 0~~' ~ _ ~ ~ .
' J~~ x., ~ ~ ~ t~ ~;~°~4',~5°w 17.57' . ~'v
~ uAK
~ ~ , ~ ,o~~~
° q 05 ~ \ a f ~br,.,t~ia r. ~ N 900
iv 31°47°~~°'~ 732,15' oo.n~' 2 " 1 ,F,,, XBF 1
~ s' ~1B ~ y„ ~ ~ ,O RA Z R
9 b i~; ~ ~ nR~', rv0~t~'~`73,~51' G kN R ,3 ~ ZcPrIYR OilTLOa)K, NORfHN'EST VEST
r N '39°58'22"W 161.70' CORNER LEDF'ORD PROPERTI' e~ ~e . 10" JAK ~ y3 !Ty
t . ~ ~ r;~P~R
~;r3-1061 PC-55
N 45°46' 19"1/ d4.72 ~ ,
18" OAK N 2U°OU'33"E 1'i21.92' ` \ ,
N 51°~2'~6"W 97.18' ~ '
20" OAX
1Y 48°1f 1l"'~Y 7:.19 ~S 47°10'41"W 54.42'
1/2" 1~3P
i
I
f
I
s i i
T T)
•.7 ;w'? I f'iti L-SOJ~T ~.:®Y 911 , Elie 1 v d 17~tf ~a;p. ~~a1QV~6Jlp~~~ r u K i -L
AAA °°od , ~ ;.v, a .~arveq ti+u. I~ Iv.cr s:x~ ,
a ` ~F ~i r.~~ lj a r s ~ounr~ ~~r nm~iicipaiii6 ii~~a9 ~'~';''Q. ;-Y°,
" :Q ~e ~ o ~ a;~di~t7 ,+d t n.F ~Il Or ~llilOnCf9 ii?UI it<~l3tu'~~S ;a #16 THR U #30
~ J ~ b
~ ~ ~ 037 ~ 0 W~SHIF' ~ ~ S~~1AL CRS, ~ T ~ej~+t ~ b' .~:;.x'~"~•-~°~- `..a~.:7d.1l6i...~ a~1',,<.~ Q.o °wl® FIVSHIP CHEROKEE COUNTY, N.C.
j - i~ d*V~
,1 ti;,~ i e;t3s i`8.6iiudY 't'9U37 I~~~ 1"
o, o o ,0 1V~VE~~1.~ER 09, 2©0~ ire ~ ~+~ueoe~ )9, 2005 SCALE 1" = 100,
i,~f.Jldls. a. .IJP n~~.%.! ~ t3fil~y ilq (1i i -§a j1~S! i~va +~A"u~l'C li i~;iet( lil~+ SI1;~EwYViS ltln PY~YIS QIt GCfi!(il 5UY Ve9 Pii'JdC UI'id@I'
;~,~s~,~~:,,; , dGst;a~ ~~.~~iwr, roc i~~, i,: 4ar~n a~.~~,~ arc. ,~.~r~, s~ . 100 0 11J0 r gar a ~ ~ ~ 7e t~ounda3' ias nt„ surveyed IOU 200 300
i~3 f,~ttr i{"E+ai,.;anJ f.13 di OYd i1 YiG""~ In~i, ~iud Oil i' +Vilh;S Iu;3eU=t , F~uyat : f~lUi i11e fQ~if) QY -
ecu:rvd~ u.~ R~+.a~ec i5 I.ift,Qi}d.+- tta_"; s,!ur ~n,~w ;,epaxz~d in ur„i:eruunce+ Fv~~h~ u, 5. -~'?'-3t? as amended. GRA.1°IIIG' SCALE' -FEET - FEET
t6, i~"Kau np tii ~I'y~.,.U• S{yliu PEJt B, {leer 113e I~i1tE:0~Y U6. '.a 'o ~ C,( "ilf5j~~e'~ IY~V G~t ,~4 6~~i1, 11., 2fJi3i,
, REFERS SCE - ~ !ENCE - DD-1183 PG-559
~ - . i PREVIOUS ~ ~IRVEY ENTITLE.U ~ NTITLED "ROBERT LEDFORD" 09-18-05
y'.~ /
:rte ,gut 1e, ~ _~~~`"~'~'i e G i _ ~ q
DOIY1~1, )ONALD L. C J DELL
2857 C~I~F' CR. 57 CAMP CREEK ROAD Pit PHY .N.C. 28906
828-4€I4-7 828-494-7058
r

i i
I
I . t1iyU"~~i lY dl. i ~
_ _ . ~ ~ f:L'f?'Mde' ~ ~ii
I I
; 7 " ,1
t ~
I. i - ~L 1'~. ~ FENCE' PO ti I' I

R.r~S ttE'b~irrt SE'T i~ irhr°.!3' ~.~1"`1:~1~ t' ~ :..t. i. 4320
i
S ~
" 1 ~ d t1 ' _ _ i
I ~~'`P~~' ---~:'1`~i, t~"FNCE' PfiS"t' 1~"OUN,u
J.~7 Viz' 1''()~~.U I ~ ; ~ ! ~ i': I 1 I ~
- _ ~ C ~`~'.n LINE' _.a._.__ _______a tt y~j7' y p
:A. v, W S L.°l .l Y.1 ~:i~ .iYr~lY 1~ ~ 3.,r ~,413~~L'.
I
[ i r
~ .J~ f
DB _'718 ?~G- -~"'1
Y
dt'ili7ll i
t C
f ~ 1a' . rN
' lJLD FENCE 'i f 1
? 1
la" PQPZ~IR g/iL;L~, FENCE
~ _ I
- 2a° ~,rrv
TwrN Doc~aoD
v _ > 2a° ~aPLE ~~,t~
n ~ p,~ ~ ~
lrr~~.! b.~ ir1'L',(.c'.~ fV ~?+`i 1 tl ~ ~~3Y TIES I'C1 R~'I'.EREIVC~'1~
SfIRVi"Y 13Y KENNETH R. YOORE°
RBF JLD UIRT ROAD FOR RAW SEE DB-252 PG-231
IfFPF
a ~ .s ti
G C , ~ ~ \ APA APALeCH1A FARM
~ D9 Db-787 PG-158
c~ h~ 12" SASSAFRlS ti ~
14"MAPLE
~ j
j KttS n
'~C
~ l A, , ~

" ~ ~
; P)~ ti~~. I
i i
a , w
' ~3 ~ 4. ~ ~ ~ . i
ti oti~ / ~ ~ ~
u , c~~ i
~ ~ r

, _
~ -_-S 42°1.5'3:"°Dti' 1~i.01' I
P ~ ~ l
/ ~
/
_ i /i
it
~
<<
~
4 , ~ ~
, n/J" ,"tiny =
!5i; _x~ ,~,r
;~i t

zt1~5' o ~ S) /
I ! j 9 j U
i 3 i I ` A ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ . ,~D~ oJlt,tCd.Na'UN -w ~ , D13-112a Pc-658 v
: i ; ' ~ ~
~i'"~ ~ ; N,i
",r^^~` ire i ~ b; L•EI)1%vRv
i l i,'/ ~D--1149 PG-720
Jn~iC~ tll:v111,:;iJ ~1
DB-838 PG-155 1"OPF tt/~ l~
~ ~ }
~ b°'d,~~n1ti ` ~ ~ _ ~
- °~al Z'Zi'ZS` ACZ~L~"AG°~' h~CLUZ1~;'S'
I „_659 A~JD f~B-376 ~ ~ , . t b' ~ 120 ~
i ~ . , l~kr-- ~~4. i ~ ,
L"~ ` '~'za
~,4~3", i},N~',~ 1US."113.' fi'L"!1s"1' C~, ~\~•ti \
~ ~1i'°fi:~7C ~
,h~ V - 1 y1 a .Inn k{~ fir'
' ~ _
~ .1 i rdCr"UAI( 1 N, , .
E~ ~ .m f~t3.T ~ r i, rl ~ ' l
~ ;~j s; ~ % ~ E~ r
f ° ~i sP t~ ~ s p C
i 4 , a„
i. i ~ ;.J rz ; : 'ri~ ~ . a~.~ >s, ~ ,;~5°u~'i~~„~ 1U3.11' RBS
~ _ ~ r~.~-~~;3~~a.--:a~, .
!s r., _
a 1.1 _ _ r - ' ~ s . ~ t4° N 48°31'54"`Y6r 89,30' c~
f i e. /
~ P1 ~~~"(i4'02"W 15 3.18' ~3tL3,~
u' 1,' t ~ g e.S' 1~ 1 ~ , gyp. ~
w , k1i"~,I r, L t1y tt i1Pr'1tti A)t )J ?I \
. "~'g, :,r.1t~.:`i,: 1.a. : ii,~r~.ii~ N a8°48'00"~ 94.04` iv U3°2T5l3"E 48.(i~' I
1 le ~ F Cr t r „ \ \ ~ i ' °5 v
~~n..~; ~ ;.U17 ;a t~'Udi~i~,.1 , LE,L ~ fit. _,.,'?J°Y~ :?4~.{t A
7 . ,.i~il7"L' P'1.15' ^ RBS ° ~ .3t~' N 97°54 48"W ~ 1<. 7 ~ d.92' ~ .2°21'x2"~ 155:d
,-r a, _ 1 ,3 _
L_.~ 5~°~8':i"E" 192.94 / i c ~S
, 41~ 3'E` X9.40' N 39°29'U8"'~ 109.19° . 7' ~ , to l (,J 1 , ,~1 ?.,L. r ' L ~ 1 '°81)8 E d !'r j 1..'11:) isYt38"+~S'°E 13`.09' N 3E3°55'31"~' SQ.15' LLO
e ' , ~ R13S ~ , ~ _ ~ ~ t -'i'l ; 57u21 ~1<"L' 2&~1 ~s9° N 23°U4'02"A' 4~d.21 LLOYD
I 4 DB 1019 i L- lze ` 8~~ 17';:b1."E ~<7.15' N 55°Ofi'47"E 52.45' ~ ~ ~ ~ DB-1017 PC-11
4i 1 .~i ~~ti' tr"/d.. 1v>~rrz.a~ €,'t,r ~~r1~t~ ~LU7i1~+ ° ~ 3.650. ~S 18°13'18"E 11410.41'
N 04 39'25"E 1~"rv.59' ~;;°25'3e°E 1~.~.~2' _ , . ,
H~; ~~1 _ ~ ~ '_60` U1)1L:9~s' aiir,,~`+'fNi; Ji~1~1tJi,G
Uf'F 1" ' , 4~~y Pn °8 -
~':7 tlU. u11 , L_: i}[ JV f 1 n i)1 JJ:Y r r 7 , tlO° 1.._hi Yi iib~r ~V'~' "Y'1e 1T U~. V~Y D ~~5.) 7 L1 ` a4.T7' t,--ti `,i 42' N 12 43' 13"E 13b.43'-..~, gr`~,, ~.i
I ~1. , ,~t, , L...,y i7 70 -1~ 4.1 88.4. ?p 4j • N.C.G.S. MONUMENT
s : r) , 1, id~ 70°54~ 1'I"~ 55.30' S,~,.~,~.a~ "CHURCH OF GOD" x~~ c ~f~cj WAD 83 GRID COORDINATES
, , t 02' L .w a 81 39,4.~"W 4~.;3b' N E Z-1; ~ i , _ ~ y 1, 1 ~ ~ 80' 1, 79°b 1 13"W 86.33' N 12°43' 15"E 14.0~'~~ 1"OPt% 47$2"~ l ,0°47.52„ f, f N = 541,666.70'
ttzlt(~k~ :,~~~~ir~1~V~: ,ttitdl;,v:' 1._.1,9 ~t~,~~' .;...94, L-~~'°r' rl°57'35"W 75.74' ~9dttY E = 433,047.40' COMBINED GRID FACTOR
r~ ,s ,qy`~ 4.158' L"_t; ~ J9°10'47"A` 85.30' llB-378 PG-184 ° , r 14 L- 4r u 7°3 rv 70 47 54 W 24.99 ~u ,t~.;i9' L-15 t1~~ w-,,',3'38"'E X1.10, 7 1'18"ll 72.19' W 24.99' 0.99979684
I , ~47` s ,fi'~ 69.59' L_ ld N 4=i'~i~~r3'03"E 23.28' L-10 ~ry 71°18'11', II 51.85' ~
~ ~ u " . ' ' L-11 N 84°38' 17 rr~ 89.94' ~ 45 11 1s W 213.78 L~ 17 ~ L' ?7.44' ~t :.17)9.25' _ ~ ~,~ts ~ ,~~-1~ ~ ~t1'a"";)~_ ~ 244.1'' / ~
i L 113 r~ cr:~"s,J 09' ' ~ ~u-,+d~;;'~ 47.48' ~ L-;3 rv 37°~~?,~'"W 83.~Jr..' Lr1Lu:~' J 'I'tl f1 l' -19 N 8d 04'55 E 23.42' ° ~ ~ ~ III
-e S 34°z5'5;i"M 34.5T L_ ° 22. ~ L-14 N 25 ~8 4tl W 87.83' " INC DISTANI'E ~ : " 1 V -7 S' 29°82'39"~ 30.21' L 20 S 78 59 68"E ~ L-15 N t0°33'44"E 42.38' t'uURSd dCAtt ~ ~
L L-21 S 70 04 55"E 45.81' ~f.17 \ ~ , -cry I ° y ~ , ?,-d S 22°114'05"~ 57.48' _ ° L-16 N 25 34'04 E 53.86' _ ° 1~~ L 22 S B9 19 51"E 47.23' _ ° L 1 S 49 33 Z8"E 9 3 _ T~ ~ ~ ~ ~
L 9 y 12 d7 39 W 45.89' _ ° "E 21.89' L 17 N 17 17 18"E 50.50' _2 S 49°33'29"E 157.03 ~•y1~ L 23 N B1 4955. L-18 Nil°34'37"E 82.88' L ~E ~
i 1;i O,i , ~va;~ ~ 41.44' L- 24 N d0`1~i'27 E 1{1.89' L-3 S 45 4729"E 81.()4' 11 ti46` ~ 1>n "L' ,15.24' L-19 N 21`11'13"E 83.78' L~-4 S 42 42'17 E 90.d~3'
~ L-25 N 45°03'55"E 22.84, ° ° 1 ~ i 4'-u"r 7 ~°l;` 28.84' L-2t) N 28 `L9'44"E 90.05' L-28 N 28°01)'08"E 71.81' ° L-5 S 88°54'01"E 48.20'
~ .'3 t9°a2'2~3"E' 22.25' ~ L-2i r~ 34 48'14 E 48.97' i ~ L--27 N 2k" 3rr 01 ~L X7.33' , _ 1 8° 7, L-8 S 80°18'31"E 53.43' INTx ,V 4 O1 31"E 83 2 ° WIT1 INTERSECTION CIL S.R. 1320 WITH CIL HAMBY CEMETARY
L-28 t>u°; ~ tir°~' 4u.05' ,-"r S 71 33 01°E 102,18' L-23 AI v0 49 t 8 E 80.29' OT ~'Z~LL ROAD I L_-2~ s : r,'~` `~s.10' .f -d S 1ti°09"02"E 80.00' ROAD
L-2~ N 38°513'0(3"'E 44.29' RE1t) 1)FJ-1088 PG-228 L--30 ~0"'r~ ~1°1.53' ~ L-9 S 34°04`44"E 109.03' L-25 Id 21 '`414'06'°E 104.30' DB-485 PC-'150
1,-31 iv : ~ , 4~ ~ .::3.74' L_,26 27°36't)d"E 144.41' L _ ,12 ."E _ .4T .
L_f , tti 41 `a'7 116 `E 77.45' C, -33 rv . l v .48' L_28 .v 2ti'K)~;1r3"'E 125.12'
L- 34 ~ , . a 6.30' ~ 1," I;-2#9 N 3,~'1r'(16"E 119.57" i 1,~--3~ N ;33.89'
L_36 15 s. 3t~,53' i•-110 tk 1t)".,:123 06°'E 141.98' _ . L--31 ~d ~'ts'10Uti"E 58,84'
~ 1, 3'7 _ t,~_ ~ 1,33' _ 3~; rr ab u~ 03"1 72.64'
L _3Ei r; ! 23 ~;4.99' ,4 L- 3~t rd flG'~7 U6"E 41.28' ~ 1~_ 39 _ r7 .7 4 ~>tti."l4'
_ j . t;°' if.59' L 3''x td 70 29 t;u li 89.05' L 4t I ~ 1,-s33 tv' 74`t)~`3G"L' 47.78' . L. 41 ,v 11~_~ 1 ~ ~;~~~.38' ~t, V `8`'=1'7'017"'" 27.82' IBERT LEDFORD
39' L J . r 2 ~ L- 42 15 0:, 1,; 49 L...ir N 09~iii1'G8"E 57.64' -3
1,--43 ~;;~~.~r 1~"~ 1.5.64' S~~OAL C~~ EK T D ~N~S § L~-35 tV 33~°?.3"'1'08"E 80.98' TO WNSHIP CHEROKEE COUNTY, N.C.
L-323 17 d4r°4'7'08"E 50.68'
L--40 iv 78°w'7'Oti°'1+,' 54.07' L--41 a~ tltl°a2't~"E e8.o2' AUGUST 1 ~
~ L-4~2 ~ 78°40'5<1"E 108.07" 3T 18, 2005 SCALE l ft = 150'
~ j ;..,,i,i~i l Hl.~ IVn l-:+1)37 ce1 +i1y the ?u, ilawiiig." L-43 N 88`47"08"E 80.9'T I
0 150 300 450
~ ~ ri a :u u ~i X11 ~hi:aP~n,: 1511 0 I ; a, ;~,I f ~ 1 ey J
, - .i,i ~ v;a ;~P Icliltl. GRAPHIC SCALE - rIC SCALE' - FEET
~
J ' - - I _ REF'LRENCES DB 1149 PG ~ ~ 3-11.49 PC-572, DB-1120 PC-659, DB-378 PC-164
SURVEY BY PHILLIP ALLEN ~ P ALLEN ENTITLED "BELLAND PROPERTIES" 12-89
I ° u'~ SURVEY BY PHILLIP ALLEN EN ALLEN ENTITLED "RICHARD J. L UCIBE.LLA" 05-27-88
~ SURVEY SURVEY BY KENNETH R. MOORE
"I iii;iV,..iJ i_. ,(.;:_l. 1'f.=, i'011'Ity ihUl ihl~ 1dl?I1 kYlta +.ECWU:r~ 1st s,~t 's UpBrVi,1~1, 9r~.,. ~~it WcfUQI btU~ddy 1110118 W7der ENTITLED '°PHILLIP S ~ HILLIP S & ANNETTE H. LEDFORD" 04-28-05
itifx 4., t' ~i~~ t,,avt. eYc3 Cil~7t ltlll YeCai'i1 F9 t1 171 {~UtiB ~';i r~ie Gi;-i.~ 1i1tl} lua 1r~;iil~i.i.5 IW1 Sllf Ua~8C1 C~URVEY BY P~IILLIP ALLEN E. 'ALLEN ENTITLED "ERIC & STEPHANIE WILKINSON"
s i, t a a vkigi vr: ~ m lu ofi Iy111B? :I,G a,1~, , 171gW11 1!•101 irviulnualler , I~la a C DAI'E'D 12-d2 RECOR.
i• (rC 11118 ',iIJV .v 19 'r tit U1 i3 !it gCCQ1 d6r~Ca W1I~~ b i, $i .'~41 tl5 Q11V~IldBd. 1~ ,,,q~//~~ ~I Li it ti.,..,, .i i-. ~,.isi~.1 z i~119;1,1~~° ih. 1 p o~ ~ ay V 0I 02 RECORDED PLAT CABINET-D SLIDE-163
i o o S s G r, ( '~i±1tt_,, tits B Jiir~ii ,89':110, tv Yf3a hii tYtl)8f dutl 5*:~! 7`E`il~s 0=!' llfi~~ ;{~~U. ,1._~201,;~ o~~~. ~~G SiQ~ti e ~ P Yq' :'S9 r
r ~ Q s ~ i
j ~ ~Cti 1 ~ ~ L t ~ ,~'i L
•3037 ~G'lVAL ul vab; r _ _,r,;~';~ _ . _ d :fF Q.~; .rm 285'7 CA. DONALD L. COf2DELL 2857 CAMP CREEK ROAD
j - ~ ,p o, v; PF rj, o s v~!,,.a tvv MUR MURPHY N.C. 28906
I ~.,,,UR 828- i~a1,, , ,t.~1 ,,(p "pQ~,. 828-494--7058
I ~II~ 1. ~0~69~ /1111111
I s... _ - _ . _

' _ _ - - _ _
OUTL00lC RIDGE
LU1' LINE CALLS C/l C/L RUAD CALLS E TU 0 C/L itOAD CALLS G TU N
Nines COURSE BEARING DISTANCE CUURSE b6~ARINC DISTANCE
r ° ,uD aet rr, oll ri nts-of-rtuY and easerrrenrs. CUUR Thls su v y J V CUURSL` BEARING UI59ANCE L-1 S 17°24'48"$ 85.53'
L-28 S 54°05,25"W 73.22' L-1 L-1 S'71°UI'19"!/ 40.58 L_2 S 01°0T28"B 19.40' 4' - -
Acreage shown calculated using dirr,anslons shown. L-27 S 39°1221"E 50.1T L_2 L-29 S 44°33'41"E 47.61' L-3 L-2 N 72°21'04"N 22.70' L-3 S 28°18'27"K 22.43' ~ L-3 N 38°53'12"A 23.58; L-4 S 64°22'09"I/ 25.15' S.R. 1319
eum uteri v u. M. D. method. L-29 N 48°54'30"~ 57.79' L-4 Acrenye p Y L-4 N 34°34'41"I/ 41.28 L_5 S 70°$8'21"If 82.5T
L-30 S 62°04'03"lY 98.86' L-5 L-5 N 84°61'20"l/ 19.68' L_8 S 55°33'24"1/ 21.51' YICINITY,i(AP (NO SCALf~
I disiunces are norizontul ground distances. L-31 S 28°48'07"lY 93.35' L-B AI L-B S 72°40'28"N 29:88' _ S 6°01'08"11 31.23' 80°20'47"R 28.12' L 7 9 L-7 S L-8 S 25°54'!3"If 157.71'
L-32 S 72°48'28"E 35.53' L-7 S 80°33'11"f/ 58.02' _ L-8 L 9 S 31 4D 21 ? 41.03'
(i,is suave aus urfonaed using n lopcon GTS--2B L-33 N 95°53'08"E 18.94' L 8 Y N I s r a t i u r,. L-34 S 35°53'52"E 31.03' L 9 rata L 10 L-9 S 58°3721"11 51.23' ° 8.08' ° 58A0, L-10 S 37 47 34~ 1/ 8 L-10 S 44 3135. L-11 S 29 45 51 IF 1D9.22,
L-11 L-11 S 40°1815 If 86.01' L-12 S 50°2T3S"If 23.39
NroperlY Is uur local°d In a ituod plnin. L-12 L-12 S 38 0898 M 49.48' L-13 S 7x°20'19"A' 22.42'
L-13 1/2" fik'.aalt ~BT ~U' hhUAd t.~L RUA1J UN L01' L-19 L-13 S 21°02'25"11 92.78' L_14 S a8°38'08"fi 22.5T L-14 S 24°48'41"1/ 49.83' ~-15 N 7U°61'SO"1F 22.80'
LINES, UNLESS OTfI~'RRISE NOTED. L-15 L-15 S 31°20'59"1/ 84.31' L_18 N 64°48'18"1/ 22,00'
L-16 L-17 L-18 S 33°1T14"1/ 54.94' _ 7 N 44'50'55"!/ 82.44' -17 3 30°2T15">/ 94,95' L-1 L L 18 N 23'02'62"I/ 25.98'
L-1D L-1D S 48°14'02"l/ 29.97, -18 N 09°08'21"a 108.19'
L-18 L-19 S 81°49' 15"!/ 58.71 L L-20 NOB°68'05"lf 39.88'
L-21 N 21°02'25"1/ 30.32' L-22 N 34°18'28"II 22.90' LOT LINE CALLS
JANIs'S BROTHERS' L-23 N 52°44'28"If 24.29' COURSE BEARING DISTANCE
DB-570 PG-73 L-24 N 74°39'13"A 28.7T L-25 N 89°65'08"I/ 87.9T _ ° ~ , .44'
L 1 N 58 3158 k 58 L-28 S 87 3618. 34.28' L_2 N 6U°65' 18"E 82.99'.
L-27 N 64°2618.11 18.86' -3 S 30°65'32"11 23A1' L-28 N 19°33'37"11 18,60' L
S 49°33'28"E 9.23' ° ~ -4 S 30°66"29"P/ 30.61' L-29 N 13 1402.E 19.94' L
L-5 N 70°04'04"IY 47.24' L-8 S 50°12'31"i1 38.42'
R0~ YFPF L-7 S 47°20'47"lY 25.85'
S 49°33'29"E 108.08' 1oe.oe' - S 83°59'53"i1 32.35' L8
f L-9 S 48°63'38"~' 11.88'
yV S 49°83'29"E 50.9E 0 - 0 S 32°29'27"E 88.01' i°93 29 E 50.98' L 1 L-11 S 08°18'55"11 86.79'
33 10" PINE -12 N 82°48'48"A' 34,80' INE L
N °pb S 45°4T29"E ° -13 N 89°"~T57" 11 81.7T S 45 47 29 E 81.04' L
M ti ~ 1.29ac. , L-14 N 52°38'49"F 21.55' L-15 N 10°50'53"A' 14.11'
r ~ ti 10' POPLAR p, ° 10' POPLAR PHILLIPS L-18 N 37°20'06"11 36.70'
42 42 42 4d 17 a' 9u.o3' UB-718 PG-201 L-17 N 54°03' 17"!/ 31.74'
p' ~ 32 / ~ L-18 S 58°05'00"W 49.22' S 88°54'01 °B 48.2D' L-19 N 34° 18'44" W 72.46'
/ ~ OAD L-20 S 54°01'42"11 49.3T
/ ~ R ! C ~ 1' / ~ r 34 20 PINE 1.U7ac. ~ :0" PINE S 6U°18'31"E 53.43' L-21 S 07°18'53"W 8.38'
s D 001 f - S 07°18'52"W 70.73' D OOD XAPLa ..E !02.18' L 22 S 71°33 01
L Kr re. 1.41 ac . ° k ~ '6,
~ ~ ~ J o, l ~ IG r t LOT LINE CALLS y k
/ 9. ~i S 18°09'02 E 80,00' COURSE BL'ARJNC DISTANCE 6 ~ !L ,
/ 1p, ~ ,O~ac. 1 4°04'45"8 98.54 ~ S s L-23 S 65°52'57">s 28.71,
~6`~ ° „ ° 2 49' L-24 S 15 0011 a 14.01
3 ob. 9r S5 74 ° ~ 1 ob, $ $ `15 L 34 0444E 7 i ~ _ B 18,38 ° L 25 S 39 38 35 ly N 52 9559E 90.00'
NAU d'J Iilt/U Ifultll/ 'V f~ 6 C) .C 35
er rrES r'v PREVrvus s' 1.02ac. ~ SURVEY R~1/ 15 ~ ~ k L-a RBF
~ v 1.6?raC. LEGEND:
cl aC . r~ / ~ >r SEa - 1/2" RESAR SET UNLESS
~ ~ r s N OLD ROAD FOR R/ p DB-x52 PG-291 OTHER1fISB NDTED
s qo° t / u? M~ ~ PETAL FENCa POST o rm ~
2 30 lg,, ~ POND ° m ~o ®-TREE
o ti 1 r ~ ~
1 _ 14 / Aec 9 ~ CE POST FOUND ACCESS gg yFpF-- PETAL FEN.
L-34 ~ - -s4 ~ ~ RBF-RabAR FOUNU
ac. ~ \ .33ac. 1 \ L-4
40 - 79 ~ ~ s g 75 C ~ \ tz" SASSAFRAS G
1'Oy(, o 3 r , 0 1.78ac. S 50°48'55"A 50.42' c.a yAPLa
jl. ,s~ o• 1.30ac. 5 ~
sQ S - / 4 13 ro G~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ° . 8' ~ ti S 21 59'07 E 71 1
-6 ~ ~ o ~ L-2e ~ ro ~ °tiry r
L-a 1.03ac. / w C ~ S 34°48'21"E 52,78' it 5 37
,c-7 ~ ~ . ° 8'29"a 9.94' APALACNL4 FARA( q S344
s ~Q @° o s ~ y' DB-767 PC-158
g~, eo, r x- ~ ~ 14~• A~. Off;/n' ~ ~l: L~ L-7 S 40°35'02"E 79.22' .Sac.
2 Ig,, C1 ~ ~ 25 9~ ti b qp CElJ~Nt~ S 59°48'41"E 93.14'
12 ti b ARI~~ 1 ~ , ,
~ ac. 79 4 .iac. aC . h• o s 5e°4e'4r'a' Se.eo ti~ °yo \
k ? ~q ~ 38
1.37ac. o~ i L-92 `~J S 83°29'52"E ° s ep, 4s ~ ~ 1 329.83'----_.""---~_ ~ ~ ~ L- S 41°32 09"B 49.40' 5
4,~, ~ N ti S 37.3. 99ac. \ tL-8 ~ g.9
3 1 00 4. ~ ~ ~ 72°~. Il. ~ 28•. S' ,t ti ems" S 17°58'08"a 44.77' s 1 e°3i ac. ~
~ ~ I ~
~ 11 11 . v L-ss pr o ~1 ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ S 36 08'48 a 82.89
U g en ~ ~ °h ti~ °yo ~ 41
aC. Q L. ~ tip` ~ d~ ~ e yo• ,gip 5 ~
r • ~ 5 s 77 • / 5 23 ~ ° k6 ~ .22ac. 1 ~ ~ ~ ~o
e1°o , ~ . aC . s r s ~ ~
g11,, eS°5 3s 8 .09ac. Ei , 0, ~ ; p• 1 1 58 e ° aC . ~ °08'50 >r 44.43' s se. 58,, j!+
tib S ti 1~ ~ ~ .2y. 40 r
~ ~ ti~ o 1 V', ~ ~ O ~ ~a.
~ ~ \ ~ 51 48,x, °y 6~ r'~ r A•
aC . ~ 2.05ac. \ ~ 5 22 ~'3*1 ~ G° li . 1.14a a
15 s a ° \ r~>~ ~ ~ A R/ 4~. °o N , 6~ ~ _ 5 m ~ •
ao r4,, ~ ~ aC A><e. y°' ~ s ova ac . ~ L-12
ti ~ 4813•, ~ ° 4 89. 0 4g, 80 L ~ 13~, hr 82 Y/ -
9 ~ oo 251 ~ ti 3U 0 .g3. 27 X00• bti °$1. ~ 39 82°48 48" - e3 ~ ~ ~ . a .
~ yy 21
ac . . 6 ac . . 4 1.74ac. 5 1.23ac. t,e
Sao ~ o s o y 42 •
o°g ~ , a c . ~ ~ 14,E b~ g ~b S 7 ° ac. AccESS,~
1 C1 29 ~ 'V Z~ 0 267. ~ .SSac.
' ~ \ ~ 2s y 54.3 ,
ti °y 1 ,r4~` ~ ~ 20 / t,ls
8 So aC . ~ do 0 /
~ ~ ~ ~ aC . k ~i3 ~3
C . aAp. ' ~ _ , S s 78°38,0. . a ;4 ~ ~ 2E I ~ ~'b.°0 ~ - ~ 18p,81, ~ ~ .rte / L 29
~ .'o p ,.a L-4 1 ~ 1p 0 0 0 ~ t" 6-E4 ~ 6~'~ ~ ~ ~ 43
~ M s A ti 28 S 28°50'11"E 30.00' ti 0°• ~1 ~
R' C1 ..,38.00' 5 ti ob 19 L-18 ~ ~ _ ACCESS L le ~ .02aC.
aC . t~ngp. 5 aC . ROAD ~
0 ~ 1~ , ? 2~? ~'o. 5 4!~ - ~ 0'~ 300.0. na C 4 45 RaVISED Sg ~ - - -
N p0' 0 ~f ~A r}& 7 ~ ~ , 2~ a~, V ~
~ a 226.78. - 1 1 .0 W 1 lac. r N ~ v . L-41 1.0 o ~ G 0 ~ 79
1 1 a ~s cn ~ q ~ ~ SI ~ ~ ~ r N 1.02 ac . ~
l r0 ~ rP_ fl ~7
11 iwv. °1 ~ l.U1ac. r -to v
ao 3 ~ ~ -tt ~ 7g°4T4 'Sf• S 29°32'58"B 3'7.28' 113 ~ N 16. -49 ~ ti
00 ~o o p ~ 48 1 ~ a o ro a o~ p S 78°is' ~ ~ L-14 -t b, 131 11 18 111 ~ b, 3 w 1
aC . 04 ~ e $ o ~ L-19 ac . y cv ° 0 249.48' 16 ~ 46 83 o L
• ~ N 1.31ac. ~ • 5 4 0 0 ~ d, o~ ~ U5°56'29"~ 77.51' 'r 8 SB ° ~ - -99 1.56ac: o S
rn a c ~ ti c ~ p. .77ac. 15 2 ~t, ~ e ~ o~ ~ v ~ ~
ac . R fi y a r, • ~ 1 ~ 110 ~ ~
60 0• ~ 81 L-98 60 i~ ° ,p/ 9 6 ° S 14 31'11"R 57.20'
„ , \ ac . ~ ~ , ~ ~o ~9s 1715'LL 1" \ 1 9 ~ 9 40 3 ,
.02mc. L-1 1 2.13' L--5 ~'2• ~r l ,U 1.aC. o ~ .95ac , l 1.aC. 31
, o . .a~•.E 22.70 L-8 N 8 ~ti~ ~ S o5 li 49 A 55.74 ; 118.14„E 1p8,71' L-7 S 73°92 e~~' ° 49.94' • L_ 5 19 14'41 M
f. ~ ~ ° , v ° ' " 32.70 48 27 25 E 49.74' L-8 S 68 6d 6~ fi 18 ~ °7~ r C7 1t~ 51 ~ f1 84 31°00'00"IP 16.43'
N8D°20'12"E 133.13' L-9 S 61°30'1"fi 68.47, ~ 5 c ~ S POND _,~y Vl ° " 3.82'
° ~ 44.42'68"iP 30.96 ~ , 1~ 563E 25.18 L-10 S .93aC. , .,-39 N 47 2 , „ 25.42' c. ° ul 1.15ac. s 31 ooao ~ z , 08a S B8 b12U B
L-40 N 84°6T38"E 22.8tl' L-11 S 32 06 48 fi ~ 1~~ , 127.34' ~ S 19°48'59"1/ 98.58'
L-41 N 78°68'30"E 24.84' L-12 S 20°16,9, fi 25.24 •f9,p, ° "E 67.74' L-13 S 03°2195 fi 25.08' L-t l\ 47 L-42 S 88 39 32 e ~ 22.49' S 7q° r
L-14 S 10 28 20 E 5416,E a . ~ N 83 '48"ll 41.01' s~ h,,9 , q ~ 286.13' S 28 06
11 t_ s~ ° ALLS B 70 C s.e,2• z aC. ~ ~ C/L RUAlJ C l~, y S, ~ 6 I8, 80 r$ l ti 69 L-87 S 09°12'68"A 31.50'
C L ROAD CALLS D 70 F ` r$ r, BEARING DISTANCE ~ , ° CUURSE ° $
DISTANCE ~ N „ COURSE BEARING ~ ~ r N c'~ 86 °32'33"a 39.86' f ~aa• / lac. S 14
_ 3 h 42.5U' t3 ~ N' ~ L 1 S 8ti a9 3 17 ~ Ap , - r ~ 1.1 r ~ ,04ac. S 12°11'50"E 17.0T
L-2 N B3°39'U4"E 82.41' ' °24'64"fi 23.38' ~ I , ! tq L-1 S 9r ~ \ 9 L-3 N 78°38'38"E 38.37 L_2 S 40°33'20"~' 24.84' A1ti 1 1 t~'' / PROP05aD ~ S 38°13'23"a .62.76'
_ • ° 1'34"E z9.9e ° aC . ~ s L 4 N 8d°1 ~ ~ L-3 S 73 29'01 fi 26.29 ti, ROAD ~~9 '
L-5 N 45 08 32 E 29.03 L-4 S 86°59'68"fi 102.42' 1' \ 54°35'11"E 69.48' ,~43 ~ , P. L-38 N 89°45 10 B
L-8 N 30°34' 18"E 3U•44' L_5 S 08°47'00"E 55.75' ~ , 4.p5">s ti0 ti °51 `rS e~ 290.87' ,0 48 g0' ?°0 , ~ ~ S 37°49'68"B 38.38'
L-7 N 07°3T38"E 24.94' ~ N 80 0 \ L-8 N I1 18'28 fi 90.25 C L RUAD CALLS C TU C 200 \ 48 48 k ti~ ~ 1 s ~ ti ?O 28,,
° , ,1 -9 N 2U 27 41 fi 27.57' L 1 ~ 88 S 33 2T07 B 31.23'
L-10 N 20°2T40 fi 68.57 CUURSE BIsARING DISTANCE (~,fv , ° 18 ac. ~ S 33°2T07"a 11.82'
- N 02 11'04 fi 30.91' L 11 L-12 N 19°11'U2"E 31.13' L-1 N 18°U2'19"8' 84.5'7' 49 sz OMMON ~ 1.04ac . S 21 38 40 a 34.97'
L-13 N 32°29'01"E 23.88' L_2 N 32°39'22"fi 45.83' ~ 68 ~ . REA ~c~9 C. A L-3 L-35
- ` ° '00"E 18.85' o ~ a C . ,11 L 14 N 3d 29 L_3 N 44 13'38 fi 25.82 ~0 ,orb ~ .96cx ~ ~ ,~5 CLC . ,p 4.5 ac.. h.
L-!5 N 45°47'43"E 62.5U' L-4 N 82°19'48"fi 45.38' - ° '0 "E 79.84' ° ~ ~ ~ v~ ~ 5 4b S 16°01'38"a 89,30'
L 18 N 53 42 8 L_5 S 89 62 43 fi 49.13' S - 7 N 53°42'09"E 48.28' ° ' "fi 41.23' I, L 1 L-8 S 88 47 44 L-28 R y
L-18 N 44°23'27"B 24.85' 5 L-29 L \ L~~ 87 ~ ~ 139 p8. 1
- N 29°22'49"E 22.18' \ L-?A L 19 ° CALLS P TO Q K
L-20 N 07 37 00 E 24.85' \ ~ L-21 N 18°14'U5"lf 27.03' COURSE BL'ARINC DISTANCE _ 8°j13~ r aaC. S 14°48'21"a 82.9T 7 ~ POND 1.1 S r A
,~-22 N 34°63'40"I/ 30.58' ~ ~ 1~ a
L-23 N 54°04'12"fi 29.10' L-1 N 89°41'2U"W 37.21' N Slo ~
L-24 N 68°22'27"fi 85.51' L-2 S 59°48'46"i/ 81,81' r 9 U~, ~ 59 ~ r ~o,, o N L-32 ° ?o j~, ~ S 18 12'30 a 49.39'
L-25 N 34°32'59"fi 25.75' L-3 S 58°54'43"fi 121.03' L-88 N 21°44'17"A 15.57' L-4 S 75°45'14"fi 107.98' J 63 w .79ac. S 78° ,
L-~ N 21 °44' 17" fi 44.18' L-5 S 64°33'62"l/ 50.10' 00' ~ U, • ~ 34 68':d' °42'38"a 37.17' 1 S 23
L-8 S 18°18'41"E 111.85' ~s ~ ~j o 212.74• 1.02ac. j °
m a r. r ~ 8 L-33 S 22°02'27"a 46.59' ,s° 5
t' ~
~r~ e~iQln d ~ \ ~ 88
_ _ ~ one c~ C . ~ .84ac . o 1 ~ ~ ` ~ S 10°07'23"B 47.33'
~ We~~a+n ~ ~ 6 ~ 1.22ac. ~9 •'1b 1 \ b ~ „ y. 6`~ ~aLL B
S .04ac. 21°21'37"'a 82.30'
13.68' V
5'8 ,?13 ~ L-24 d AS S 83 17 37'
,tsssstttrrrrrr', 1] ~ 81 ° ' d"1? 53.53' ~ 1~~ 260,06' S 38 35'25 B 49.89'
N BAR )8 4 L-2b
L Cordell RLS No L-3037 certify Ih• lollovllnq. ~ ~ „ S 47°52'18"a 45.5T
rw Ihal Is located In Q' ~ •:9 1'hol Ihle plat Is of u su y ; Q ~ ; N 38°20' 19" A 88.17' S4 89 ~ o ~ ~
of a county or munlclpollty that Is auto pot t ioe S~~ n .79ac. ^ ^ ~
unrequleted os an ordinance Ihal toqulotes 7 L-303 1.62aC. 57 ~ S 20°30'52"a 89.91' SHOAL C~ ~
ercols of I d. ~Q';t' Q'~~ P , Q:;~,Y 0! v: N 24°18'61"~ 76.50' o y 70
surveyor •,,SUR Q Q~~. ~ 1.20ac. L-23 120.04. S 20°30'52"1= 24.97'
gN Ne° „ DEE 2 4a'3o 91 ac . o ~ ~
Reglstretlon Number L-3037 '+tttntltit ° b 1C N 18 28'05 A 78.14' ~I
PLS certlty That thla plat war drawn under my supervision from an actual survey made under ~P~ °
'I,DONALD L. CORDELL, , Islon {deed descrl tlon recorded In Boots Page ,etc. that the boundaries not surveyed r~j ~ S 49°34'38"1P 7q.59'
my superv P 09-30 06 r, 71 j: ti ,AT REVIS,~D
led as drawn from Inlormatlon found In Book Page :that the rotlo of PLA T FtE VJ are clearly Indlca N 10°15'05"l/ 84.28' ~(g
alculated Is I: Ihat This plat was prepored In accordance with G.S. 47-30 as amen dad. pr ec i a I on os c 10,000 / 2008 WELL ADL - - 6 s '39">r 89.59' ED 07 14 0 1.21ac. 54741 ELL ADD. ,
Wetness my arlpinal.signature, license number and seal Ihie /y day ofJ4 y ,A. D.,~ PREVIOUS ;*n 0 l ~ j , ° 28.78'
UTILITY EASEME. ENT ADDED TD LOT X46 .ti , ~ r~, S 46 31 13' ~ Y EASEM ~ s ~
07- 07-14-06 x o3°38'35">r 148.76 ~ _ ~ r r~.,
$UrVeyOr
ry
llcenao Number L-3D37 S 43°02'62"If 172.00' tie
N 73°14'35"a 27.47' 72
~ L-47
c~ ^ 1.01ac.
1.63ac. ~ _ _ °tin ~ ~
~ ti V S 43 02 62 I/ 147.25' U
v
G
CATS AREA IBLt •'A.. S 40°09'23"M 47.48'
.24ac. .02~. L_~ S 34°26'63"If 34.6T
~ L-2
~ S 29°32'39 1/ 30.21'
~ Ndy ~ ~ay)t j° ° 1.38ac. \ v
jr, as L-9.9 S 22°04'05"l/ 57.48' t
ire
~ S 12°2T39"1/ 46.89'
~r 0
S 03°13'48"1/ 41.44'
i'~~ t~ ~ 2b
/ , N 54°40'17"I/ 28.58' S 08°24'08"a 35.24'
i i S 14°07'19"a 28.84'
S 19°12'23"a 22.25'
Hti1l9Y CE1(BTARY ROAD
C

i~0't2S
i a;~ ,~s~,~y ~~a3;ec~r to alI rights-ot-sway and easements.
7~~e refs :~ai~~t~iated using dimensions shown. PRNATE RDAD M~
ti~
~sif E~~~r,as ~y ~.">7.D. inathod.
B ~~~.li !i~~{nn:as re horizontal ground dlstanc®s. i 5
S.R. 1318
this ,!avey zaps erfarmed using a Topcon G7S-28 ~7 ! i il!1,
JICINITY NAP (NO SCALE)
S !''rperty Is eat located in a flood plain. BO° r~,,
.:>a~t4~~ 'L' ~0' .'PO.a'~ C/~, 1~OAD ON LOT 00 Ig,. Ig,,
..V~1'u. •00. ? 5' 10,
R f8* 15
S 84°47'08"E 1788.43'
ac. I
s
e~
3 ~r , ,c M`` ~ C/L ROAD CALLS A TO D . ,o~
°e7 ~ p ti Y:~t,;.~'ND 14 ~ ~ COURSE BEARING DISTANCE ti°
5 ~ _ „ , 5 L 1 N 82°03 01 1? 43.92
~ ~.~BAR SET if2„ L-2 S 87°30'20"1P 53.35' 1/2" RBF, NORTHEAST CORNER L-3 N 85°34'14"lY 83.34'
ac. 'E2S-~-- ~.~BAR SET OUTL OUTLOOK RIDGE, NORTHfiEST L-4 N 70°48'41"ll 43.83'
se CoRa CORNER LEDFORD PROP&RTY L-5 N 70°48'41"~ '
:~.SAR FOUND 1 °0,~, 4 TELL "G° ~~1 I8' ~ 0~` 4 44.84 L-8 N 70°54'17"1/ 55.30'
•80, o' M s .Oimc. _4 °b ,o°` L-7 N 87°01'53"1I 45.40' w L-8 S 79°31'37"~ 88. '
-5 13 ~ 42 L-9 S 71°5T35"A' `75.74'
9 L-10 S 59°10'47"1/ 75.20'
`°L-g 1.03ac. i L-7 L-il S 59°10'48"~ 10.10'
L-12 S 77°31'18"ii 72.19' L-13 N 71°18'11"i/ 51.85'
L-14 N 84°38'17"~ ?4.11'
~~~.~ES 3Rt~T.~ERS ~''~Z~,, 0°~ • o , ~ ti'j 2l o ,pp ~B ¢i38 PG-154 ~0 ~ ~ L-15 N 64°38'17"~ 05.83'
~B®~t7O ~~C-73 •00, aB ti °a L-18 N 50°40'58"lf 85.28' L-17 N 50°40'58"~ 158.84'
12 L-18 N 37°59'24"~ 83.02'
L-19 N 25°08'48"A 87.83'
ac• L-20 N 10°33'44'°E 42.38'
eo° L-2f N 25°34'04"E 53.88' L-22 N 17°17'i8"E 50.50'
I ~ 4~? , O~ 00 ~ o• 0~` L-23 N ii°34'37"E 82.88'
1 jr• h L-24 N 21°11'13"E 83.73'
1 NAD 83 GRID NO1 L-25 N 28°29'44"E 90A5' ID 83 GRID NORTH L-28 N 34°48'14"E 48.9T
~1 ~ / BY TIES TO PREY, TIES TO PREVIOUS L-27 N 46°01'31°'E 13.32'
SURVEY SURVEY L-28 N 48°01'31"E x9.95'
. aC . L-29 N 50°49'18"E 80.29'
~ s 81, a L-30 N 38°58'08"E 44.29' L-31 N 21°48'08"E 104.30'
Og. o ~ .0~` f °~3 II,,~ ~p L-32 N 27°38'08"$ 47.92'
ae, ti ,off ~ L-33 N 27°38'05"E 96.49'
to 0 L-34 N 41°57'08°'E 54.43' L-35 N 41°5T05"E 23.02'
, L-38 N 28°02'08"E 125.12'
~5, ` ~ aC. L-37 N 33°12'08"E 119.57'
p° L-38 N 40°38'08"E 32.91'
r f ~ g2• o ~ ~ ~~0~ ~~t., o off` L-39 N 40°38'06"E 109.07' L-40 N 29°10'08"E 58.84'
! ,a
9 , ~ OUTLOOK RIDCE LOT LINE CALLS
FUTURE DEi~ELOPAlENT
t'a ac . COURSE BEARING DISTANCE
`~a , , L-1 S 88°25'48"E 25.14'
~ o s °o F { t d I ®v L-2 S 14°01'07"lI 15,20°
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ dJ ~'ti L-3 S 14°01'07"lY 29.49'
i ~ ,~00 ti ° I L-4 S 38°30'37"E 14.24` L-5 S 63°28'02"E 22.55'
5 L-8 S 31°04'49"~' 9.02'
~ 50 1f2 REBAR SET L-7 S 79°05'01"A' 13,45'
l I `~~CONTROL NONU~ENT s ; ~ ~
F ~ . X00,
I ~ ' $ S
~ r ~ Gy la ryO~ ,
. 1 z° Ras
~ / ~ ~ ~ CONTROL
~ ~ ~ da t9 NUYENT ~ 46 ~5 ,y5 S 79°54,
e ~ Z 16 K y0 p 300,00
j t ~ ~ S 88°02' „ 1 47 $ ~ pa' 1 i~, ~ o ~ 1 ~ 10a'
I ~ 226.78 . , 1
. ae. ~ ~ ~ ~ o c S 48°50'44"1/ 49.74' o
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ 4 (xG' .
~ ® C W ~ ~ , S 55°14'17"A' 88.30'
C''O ~ ~ OO S T8°16' S 42°3T38"1/ 10.29'
S 04 $
~ 4 ~o 0 ° i ~ ° 248.48' S 40°08'33"~ 30.05' 0
.77ac. ~ ~ ~ c ' S 27°24'17"1/ 14.80' ~ 2 , ,
aC . 15 ~ o ~ R A' a S 27°2416 li 23.23 ,y
TELL "F"'
-2 \ .0?¢c. L-1 \ a C . ~ S 13°35'44"A' 81.00'
i ~ s -
S 05°li°ag"~ 55.74' ,l -
J/~ S 59°10°47"~ 52.81' - S 27°20'43"A' 48.85'
° ~ r„~'- S 59 10 47 1Y 22.38
~A~ES BROTHERS DB-638 PG-155
I
i
7a~~la ~ardeil f~!S Na t-3037 certify the following, ~~y1~09fUf1~~,1 N CAR
I ~ ~ o . °h~; 7iat Is :3t a survey that is located In ~ES$~O .
such aartian at a caanty or municipality that la ~ Q~ ygy:"f~ e m 0 Q C o
,~s~:ttl~ t'3t -as °s, ,an ardlnance vhat regulates ~ :~EA1L
j ' L~3O37
~ ~ s 0 •;yo
suRV~!:~'ti; WNSHIP CHEROKEE COUNT HDAL CREEK TO Y', N C
°®daante~~` r
OC `-:~!i; _ I'i.S, ~artify :hat this 71a; ~.•~aa drawn under my supervision Pram an actuol survey made under OCTOEER 17 2005 SCALE 1" = 100' 9
Y -a~ssrl:~~:.a ".ed '.Qscr!ptlan raco-r0ad In soak page ,@ic.J: :hat the haundarles net surveyed 100 0 100 200 300
~g r?~;+art as drawn from fnfarsnation round in Book Rage :that the ratio of
` ~ c son ~ a?°:j~ttad is ~ ~;~°~QQt ;hat this plat uvos pr®pared In nacordanoe ralth G.S. 41-30 as amended.
GRAPHIC SCALE - MEET
=ss t ~ ~Ind tLire, Iiconse ;)ucaber and seal this/, day of A.D. I - 2006
i REFERENCES - DB-1183 PG-559
PREVIOU,' PREVIOUS SURVEY ENTITLED "ROBERT LEDFORD" 09-18-05
arve or
DONALD L. CORD6LL
1-fc9nsa Number 1---3037 2857 CAMP CREEK ROAD
WELLS ADDED 07-1 t 'D 07-14-06 M82894-7058908
j

'e V J t; ~
j ¢ ~ ~ ~ d d i ,..,~+E,6'y ~:iita ~ a:; uofi~;'f{ f
147.: r , - ,rv, L.~a..1,..eA9a 1 gyp} fi k. $1 ~1,4s... a, da.wSN~4.,{,(i l!' .~rA..~.d t.~t ~7 L.~^ ~ .f fit f7 :-011 a'i d::d$f'. .9 ii .a... a.'dh°. ~f 9Y~ .,f tll7 i'L fi iv!Oir=. '8>r ~i C)~'71
.i ,
r o f, s ~)d b ~x~ i'eq; ~Gf'V 4~S Ci i1 Ce l). h(. P ° sf L t(~~~" ,}Y' / 6r4~Y 4.h ? ?s C.1 Le 'y' 1), tY~, 1.r 36;F,P 7 ii.;~ 1
e ~ !tS )t j v. d °a 1 91 ii "e' ~ ~ r ~a . 6 4i l€ f r„ L1 ! t ..a i i G
i?i b 1115Yfih 4.4.S ,r 7vl ~/i l,l . ~ ,f was`~J a'M~b,~ay
i. ~f ,ta ti ~ ~ a `dtdsslrw +6r~9 ,'Y~~s j 4V <~:i c'4` Y hi Ss?d: 4 4: n f try t,f @ Cr r~eCOfi 4.7 4ti
i .k~:P. ~ ~ ',~I,i t, h .u. A)~ l)i,w~ rY.YM O~~'~ V J.GV' i ur}
0 q a i,f ,j,~;i 5~ .v I?il. :J t3 ) i l : t: t.d i 1< ~ t { { <.l ~ { 'v Sk U {,1 t Al t i i
i
" alb,`.:' i ,i ,y r~ f .d. a . - ,
. = r ~aa ~ ~
` ~ _ { {~j Eh+~
~ t ~ i +1
~ s 1
1 i G

t ~ ~ ~ ~a
, ~ ~ a., C
w. ,1 ~'D.dx~ k.t•fIJ.`~ ~1'S.t k.l::i. _ , ~ .try--`a`~3'7 Pfr-- f 55 '${1ww~~-~6e...ls:i
a ~ yaJf' :~q,}.91~ $ t.,i C.C
iYt 3
11 ~,y 4 P t: y° ttl,i, JPo 4) r+ q~4~ LT 3Al~rai'C~` 1 i` L7 f11, di~ ~s,vti' 1V N~yV~:,Yi) & K.,...~\ J1}ii
f , n f^~-o vp; h.; yq
f r, ra ~^r 'k~ #i
.,w , v ~ ~ ~ d~ 1S ~~.=~'w'~ qi i
~ g q~f k f 117 25°~0'1~"~ 'r' g ~<i`., r ~ti~ Vii' l 6.+i'Sla'.~_=6J ._y ,r ;`t~1'e >
'J~a
:n.
, , IV 1t1°~~'41`7"~' 70.00,, ; k.t~ w ' ~ r.l ~W° ~ ' , )X
r ~1- _ ~~f v. _ 'a4 e,~ a;~ ,,4.R U.~ apt V l fald ~I
, f
5 ~2°i5'3ii°`i~ tf~i.Ui'
i
~ /
i i'
1V 59°14'01"~' S4.'~ ' i
i f
i 'jJ Sid, }
~ 1 4~i ~ n1
~ O / w S 52°3ti'~9"~ 21.55'
_ ~ I
~ y 4 1S ~.~d ~41 x. t}G Id .~^k.dA ~ :V rCl
.~UNIr s~ l uU fj i~
1 i/ ~
i i
~ :G ~'```~y~''`y~ ~l.D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t f
i

~r,,, I

` I'"'
/ ~ ~ ~ tit; . ~°a7"a°7t~'J,z~" `f ~J dry T
~ J~
I ~p J %,Y'r,~~V/ f f ~ ~l1 t
d 'ter ~ i.~~ . ~ ~ ~ ~l 4 ;j. t ~ .~~t~,~,, "'~i/+~
a'.i 9,g ~
~a 3 ^a. . ~ ~S w~ 3.'~3°J.°~j."~' `.x.33+4'
la)21 +
a + .45
b~.x~,.~~,, ti ~,.,cf `l~ i-x G... ^ar `'G 9 l ~ [~o ~~a,o ~ i~:, V1 ~ , c.i{~,~' . 31 t}U't~U ifs 20.E
, ~ r, 1 ~ r .,1 9 e" a~`" x a,u .I,J` s, ` d ~f 127.24' ~ 17~ S 1~°4di 53" ;38.513° + +a, 1.ti 1 ! ~ ~ f a :~i`~3°°a~ "~tf3.~at3° it
_ }¢y~~(,, qq ccyy a y~ gg . tiN ~ t ~d; ~ ~/.G ~//PF ~ ~3 N'17~. Lt14 / '~~•„f 26~U5'~:~1"~ 4~.t~A~ ~ar~'°3~ ~ ~.t3~' S
x r 'W r ~ ~ `~;~a ~ ~ L.-~7 ~ -•S` tlg°~2'S~ro"~°' 01.5[;` ~
~ h a r 4
~ e 1A~ 1 _ j 1 f ~ .?~t t I 1 ~ 2 v.. 't .y f' ~ - r o... ~ ~s 14~,7~a`aYC~ 1~~.~4'~` ~ ~ ~ t.~,~. 7 , r ~4~"' VdA.A.7V'
, w! . ~ _...TS 1211°5~°"~ 1°'t.07' d r k ~ ~ 1
, :i , _ d~C~~d3 ~d
, ,,r'
~t / ,~~,r'~`~, _ ~ i,. ,14i~ ~ ~ ~ro4 X5'1! ~ ~a < . \ t
, ~ ~ 20.6 C ,ti
` ,~F~ ~ r ~ . A) w 1 vw LfJ ~;flfib ~~fp~3^ ~4+`~s,. ~ t4 ~ / as'1 Vs(6'4~`SJ
\ ~ `t
1 ~ , A
,,y,,. ~ ~ T

d ,.7 u">si ~ ~i~ ~ ~.~V~lri. L 31~~ ,,:;ip L-35 ~ r.J ~i..r : .d ~ ~ t N 4 U~ ~ , v ~
N (Jf3 10'48 M 29.41 x.~ L-28 L.3~ 216 S 15°01'3t~"E 68.30'
~'f ' ~y L-2~i
tr ~ t ,t'~t k i ~ 7~,g"' ~ tk ~ t ' 1 1
~ .9 ~ P~.~,~7 r: ` 5 1~°~t3°31"~" 82.x37° i
} ~ ~
` ` ~ ~ ~a ~ S~~ \ _ ~ • Q
r" t imp t s'
~ ~ v~ ~ t, ~ g~ ,
."~~~'C. V`~ Aso 'ss v, , ~a ~ ti~_...~ r~~<, as( vTS i. ~i' ~J.4U ~5 ~ 6 fJ~ Yt5 ; ~'~"'~61~.,
" ~ Q
4f~ gym; ta. A .yr~ ,g7 ryry
fd 4s4I $ r° .f 9 b~ ~5.4iF~ ~ Yy , , ~ s^_~° FeA~AldGi'Kx t BLri`1.~~~
~ s ~ ~ tH~ t ~ ~'r~
z, . _ 4 ~ ~4~ )
s ~ ! f~, a~' d1"'a'~`~ra"'~ ki~."r3' \ ,~`9 .,~,°1~ \L;,.."~~~. ,rr .~i~~ f L a n 1, i.~ ~.r . ~ w..._
' \ 8 r, -a. , ~ , . , 1 ~ 1~
_ ~ ices"<~4'2~b"~'~ ~6;3,~8' .04ac. Z~ r y,,. , u'. ~ -
. , s~ L ~ , F
~ ~
~ a r.. ~ ._uv eepr x. -xv.wv
s.. ~S ~ vv 1 Se' n.. _ a.+~ . tV 9ts°2t~ f9"~' 86.1"~~ \
~ ~ ls4 69~ 9 ;
1 , a . ~ . ,w , ..6,:uL~~,_> ?'~~a.~~~ 6.,ra~,L~ I~9 ~ 24°16'61"~ 7b.50° -s 2 30
p. .16 ~ a .ra
+ ~ t l X63&,'e'L;a~.' ui.'.z=1~1`d1~Cm lOdeJ~~i4~;`V~+~ ~ 'CA ~ Iw.+IJLli4~ 1,-,~a ~ S ;40030'52"E 24,i)7'
ks' !3 y~y , .ICJ . 0...(Jc. yi ~P 47 ~f
1. ~ 16°26'06"iY 78.14 i
) } { 1 ii ~i ~I ~ ~ 'r
:y i
~fn: F,.i . yy- c/~ - . ~ it
10 f5°v6 W 64.2x' 71' x . 0~ t~ ~ o y
j t ~1 ar: rt.. C, '~3 s,~ ~i ~ drr~ 6i °~~.Lt°& tY'~ ~ ~~g . t, - s 47°41'39"W 6959'
1 '°?-J°~ e V~'' )4~. i'ii' ~ .r~ Jc.,t .~Y~ix : a! da. ) s. ~ ~ a '+'°b wet. V.De~ ~ rid (d~,~.l ~
s 4~ ~ ~ ti U ~ ^ ao.z., r ,
E a ~ , ~3= - • f1 :i~ ..1'l°!~;' x~"~~ ~5.~~' N 03 38 35"W 146."la'~-- ~ q•
L 1'~ x f X743 t~8 :z ~ j 9 v
~I I ' ~ 1 t r. - C nl ~ :y L S~U l~Y t)t9 ~'1'!.'J.V"iY flt1.iJ ~ ~ k'V~,
b,°., l pd , ~s~ 1~~.._ia ~a ia~ 5b ~r X7.78' ~ ti \ /r S 43"82'52"{7 172.UU'
~,x~.°, ~ „~3 5"~~ 2'7.4"7° ~ i - ~ , . L._.. f ~ srt~ OaJ 4$ W h,~, i a' 1W '13 f 4'3 ! , y ~ ' , ~ ' 6' . .~~i, L~..~.r~ iV i3<)°,~d~`10'~ ~4.5~g' $~r (5b ~Y„
, , . . ~ ~ ~ .28' -4 ms ° „ , . ~ , L ~ ~ tW 63'7°~J 4G"~' b~' 47-
fii ,
u1 n , . ~ ~.~~C d9 1,) ' r3 ;'z.~7~' ~J , ; ~ ,'~r ~ = L ~ 1 A, aK+ . G L....~-> I+~ ~~J`4u47 W ~&.$U' ~'t ~ •~}~C~,G'. a ; +
` . L Nk~. ~.rilrl .1 tt 1,/ ~ dt3 jW srCY'u 'Si;` Y~ `E J.~ii~ a u-° ~ u'b ~y ~1. L ~ a d Go'27 w 25.27 /
t ) W J yy~~)) Z~ aV ~ 3~'~- ~~u.Clc`.' L 2~~ .v 21°24'08"W 49.41' ~ ~ E. Q3~t't+~7~ .l~,~aS4l.i1'1 3.~1:JS1~.lY~.~~ u•..~Y u ~ ~ 1W 0 .z Jt" i F:~ li ~rs4~"'~' ~;:3.1Fs' L._u~ 1d 07°08'44"IY 38.10' ~ C~ S 4302'52 ~ S 43002'62"W d'G P .25'
. , ; ~°,~1 a~~~d;i'5a~"t~ 50.1t~i' L-25 N 17°20'10"E 67.75' ~ ; : c .1 w
tV Si1 r utM 7Y v~'7. i,~li _ . .a 1~l UU Gf 34'"J~ ~i~.wii
L- ~ N d4°uu iiz w ;i7.6b' L ° t--2~ N v3°5o'0~'~~ x9.77' GATE AREA ~u,.w„ s 4o°os'zs"w 49.4s' 19'25"w 47.48'
L-~ S 79 43 30"w 47.72 L-23 N 11°31'41"~ 45.73' .24aC. .ozac. L-5 S 72°33'06"W 84.49 L-24 N 40°33'41"B 80.25'
L--u S ti8°12'14"'W 42.70' ~~E; L-2z S 34°25'53"IY 34.57° 3"W 34.57'
t,. ~~4~iU~;,~4"~' w~.~,. l ~ ~.__S X9°32'39°'~ 3t1.d1' ' :30.21'
~ ~ (.t,~, .
rf L-ss S 22°04'05"~' 57.48' 7.48'
f9
S 12°27'39"~ 45.89' W
r
-S 03°13'48"W 41.44' 14'
a0
r ~ i~1 54°40'17"'~' 28.58' S u6°24'08'°~ 95.24' W
~ S 14°07'19"t' 28.64' .64'
i ~---519°12'23"E 22.25' ;.25'
~~~BY CIa;~'E~'ARY ROAD ' ~
O1'~r~~LL V I 1
L1B-1086 PC-~2 { ~ vk TI T' T 7-)
> w ;EOO~oaas,a :~,,w~a i. ~ diu;z Iao t.-3uar c~.~~, I~p .Eta. i~E hxauirEy, an~a~'~ ~.rr~i~j~'~~1~~a 0" 0 K E
S 1. ~~,~.•~~o .eq, V ~'pQ
ti o,,.. + . F, , ~ ; 'pFE Slily.,, ~.,ry ~ r r
. ~ s.. ~1uly ~Y iuE nii; Id,u~>>; 19icE Va y ~ ;J ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~,~m:y~,..,,Ea. .J` ~iV abE. <xP'C71t~(iiitb Yt+GE reytiiui+:. t7~~ Off, 1 183 P-559
E ai;E t; rti,a ~1a.i.~ " ~ ~ ! Y
o ~o L-3437 r WjVSHJP CHEROKEE COUNTY, N.C.
~ •~..a.,;,.~• ~ 9 a~,;a„ c~~,:;;; nun~s~~a L~3~137 ~a ~ 0~~~ 2000 SCALE 1" = 1+00'
~ ~ °~°d'~tsa~a~~
i s
...tS~~i«t:. to -i ~ a'l. ka, s;:0P 9,iy @L~,tl ,b ~~I~s 1GU .1 ~~11~1~ ~JU;tti IY; 9q~i~fVi:i i8i1 Y"f Jii1 J7"1 ClC71J ty~ Ui'VU,~ i"iCl iM U(YGif ra ~a~-~,~;,~ u.:a¢,rd"ViE~~ t~,. Ert csau~ r'~,~ ~ u~~. ~ ti?,E1 11~~s buy=;idars~~:~ v~rtd su~ve~'~¢6 .,.a. ~ a N , W ~ _ 0 10th 200 300
~p1 E~
j a., w s ; ..a .?..l;, ul~i! Uw 4ai+ltiu~N a~iu9 is~l+ Gain i~~t oaEtP 81V =i E'; , i~aYjJ'q a tf)(!t ltkat Pa'~f IS U~' trli!lL~1711r ~7ti~LI+ 1`~'Li CAL1s FEET
Wcaai°., .~a ...~,~,t++~~€~+4 ,v I'•y~,pa.liflJ- ~is4a ~ &f.i'S isL41 is; JCE.al'f9Gi`t%° Y%'II~i (7.;i- '-`.~~,3 J`3 ~tC7iuHl~t7;f. ~ „ RENCES - D -1183 PG-559
t GYO ~~l1C , (f., ,;'l t~aRl :~3„lqV 1417 14t,1~;i ilvi~tl~tli iii+. aC:i; ~~i VtGS i36, J61' p ~7~>~3 ~ :t.,. 1~~.)i3~ 3YL~lJ1 kLI1P ~ 1 f ^"P i yy~~ny ~j ~jrif aY ~ ~)7~py{~q{/7py {py' ~y
. f,_,. 1141)Pi V'Yl~ ~~/141.LJ~dJ~~~ 1%. ~ / I 1 ENTITLED "ROBERT LE'DFORD" 09-18-05
J i / lr D4tV~i~.~f l ~ DOIV: ii,Z) L. CORDELL
f _ ~ 2657 a 2657 CA.,`, `P GREEK ROAD
g RfU.~P A ~ MURPHY N.C. 28906 828--494--7058
t E,:~r:uw rVt~iE,~,ti~ ,>t,.i
a _ _

y
~t r .~1 ~ Ir-~~.~`~ 171 ~~f i 4['~d.. ~~.1 ~i ~r- ` p~ _ i
qq ~J Yv ~4A+f'H? ~~tfl~~w3 if V 1 i ~ i il~tAL k, ~te..,l n~ ~s,P 1r ,
d ~ :r r~+trf~4`$~1~1'LW ,~~r~S~~E1dVl,'~ cciUia.r1Y G'Lsns~l!'dr a/~lxt1E'~` , , . e s,... ~ t~,.~f~a~~.,, ~.S~di^Jia' ~,dl~, a t11~1~~:'~"
~„~F L7 1.0ia twJ PGA ds.~.a _ 7 r J ~-a ~s`"~• vJ i)r' F tai
7 y ry ;i ~ 0t) t_ s u 9r' ^&t3 d~J Y Kz ~r r~ ,~Y v~ dr.e ~W,d t' r~~~~Y'U=t'r 9Y N2,•a~ljo i+~_a', u G~ ~ i'n'+t1"15 ~J.`s~l' ~ 3d i
~,..~,33 0°~~'~~:.~"ts ^d'~.6i' N' i~ r ~~i°_~a2'~°A' _'243' i ~ . •1, ^rr ~1 b--;f LY >11°~c3 A,~+ 6d S. ¢t~B y q PW~~~ , ~~qq~"'lI , y
a1 lw 1~~ 4A~ ~ 4 f 1 i7' 5 Q - , ,,.,-,r_ ~ 41 i2~ 4i ,~WB' L-~u ~ 7~ zi2.5T h~-~d~ ~7 = ~ f~4 O~i 6~.~6' L--~ .N a~i' ~Y 19.ra8' p~ 1 .-r•yr d cas„'. ~ t ~
~ ~ ~ ~ . ~-~~~9 ' ~t5`'~~}'~$7"~' L-~~i S ~+~°~~,;'&~i"~i~ ~8,~k3` de'"'~ ~~>s~" ~1 Vii'
a~ ~~s2 ~S' 6~ ~s~.~3' a--1 S x,541"~~ 28.L~, ~--U ~i 25`~~ ~_~2~"~ i;r7'71'
~ ~ 'M ,f J,@P'f7 f" d ) L~~ IJ t7~°S.I r('W ~"Y~ ~~.{:i 4~' ~ dS~ ~~i ~w 31,(1 r „-3U ~~1p~ y~1r~ ~5.u8' Z.VtP' g
ra-i~ d ~'7d~' CS .17~` L-i`W S ~r6`~i~r"3J"YT 43.~g~' ~yy,...pti ~ <`1'~~'°~ a~.3~' :,'3.3:3'
~ -Y r .1« °~.r .~,~.~rr_u•T ry )c7~ L`fe: t~ _'.I ~ y6' Y~TTur' r Lr' Sib 47 d, Vw rd~ PY +~4, 4 U' ITT w~ i J;;2. s'i °
0 L I k S ~~"4i ~rf 43.~s4~' r~~ar~,> rr k~°Q,a"~~' ~~°~ia 1`V 7L~?lbt~"~ f~.+.~'d~~ s
~ .~i".1~ S o.~.. ~"l1 ~T~ ~2.d3t3'
L-•d! S au ~t q~' 3 ~y~y',,,.~3:' f
~-115 S iii°14°02"~ 29.5'7' 3,-i~; t~ ~ ~;5.9~i p ~~--iii :~v tr ~~°ES.I~' rJ "819' ~~'i M' ~U,'i i' G`~e+J 'v L~ .7~"A J~.~,JUr ~ tr ~ ~y, 1
3.32"
n L-~2~ Id «~=-a~"~~°'~ 22.90' iLV S3A~..ivi~7 "ryr, 3~ tltl ~d ~2. ~3U ° ~3 ~ ,__Pa .(r A a.,`.x=~ Ls e:.3, 1
L`11 i1 r 4d 1" ter r.~ ~__~°k i~t~ ; `~r'_~ ~ °i~ ~.~a~i,
rt`,r~ fS"s.~T ~7. ~
' 1;-23 ~ 1J°~s~i' `~jicLY X8,60'
k~ 4.;3~;~3'28'°E a.~;~' t,--29 ru` 13°`t4"02"R' X3.94' I ~.a~.~r' .f,.e a~'i cif\.~~,i~.7y<J i~3eS,~+. ,P°. °
~ . r b y r 1s e3 n a
t ~ ,ks 1 a5 'a{~ij~lr~s~+ a~f man ~J
a
f t`
e i a^~° / e ° y ° P.-x°37" Y ~
~f~ d
y yy pp Ti& "s"' \ r'
' ~ 1~' }~~~la~`~ i,` a
~~ti;~` m ~~,~°-716 1"'~---~(i }1J~ ~ i P ' °7Ja~ x ey a e !P ` a~J f ~'.L~: k
i+;°--13 ~y eta°O~i'~i{1„ °$.a~~~' 1
• ~ ~ \ A'a.I.ft.V
~ ~ 34 20" PYt+7~'`> 60°Y8'31"~ 53.43` ~ , ~ . ~ c.~ ; , ~ s j
4 i 1L4f"LE ' r:~. ~ l ~ . D~WOOD ~ I ~ ~ . ~ CSC, . s vi°ss'oi ~ ioz.ie' y~~ ~ ° L-22 S 07°16'52"~ 7U."r3'
~ij''. _V. i X11, y• k~.... r'', X ~1 ~ ~ ''rte
~ 1 5 16 08"v2"L 60.fru'
~ ~ r~ / o. ~ f ti .<jG~' ~ ~ j Ct~LTRSE f1E~iRING DISIANG'1r' i
L-23 S ti5°52'57"E 26."ll'
~ ~ ~'a J n~~c v l ~4 L' 72.49' L-24 S 15°00'11"E 14.01.`
y-: or - ~ p u' ~ q~: ~1,~~j ~ 52°35'59"E 90.00' L-25 S 39°36'35"E 16.30'

~ L-3 l~ i` , .r' y v"~ p/'. it
~ ~ ~ I Wir.
is u.
( ~ ' ;'i ~~r ~ ~ - .r~-~ `"t~. ~ A.9-252 ,~C-23~ 252 ~`C-231 FJd.~iu~tr ~~1~'I"~.(,~ ~
1 ~ ~ ~ ' C"~ 2'1K€.c~y.~'
` O S ~i. 1 f~ w1.r~r d
z r ~ 0 ~ ~ . .
4 fd in'~~p€,F°Y Ra k~ka 1~~ ~ ~j gl, 1• ¢ i~Y> P~ afar"e./i1~J X1711 .I4111.? 1 ~ y„ ,w • iii /
c ~ ' ~ _ 1~ gyp; ~ w.., ~'t. 1
r r ~ . f ' 1 ~1 ~ • ~ ~L$J td . ~ . ~ ~ d~ , ~ ~ 4117°Y~'~~" py. t T r Y ~ ~ , . ~ ? ; ~ jam.. r ~ ~ ~~5 L~ i~17 °'YZ3'Vt/fP P! i'~Jti~.~f4'
g ~ y , ;~i ~ ~ 2.1 ~ r e~. ~ . 1 '
~ ~ ~~.rab~: .~~i i ~.n~, ! ~ y ~y ,,..5 2t ~t3'U"7 ~S` `Y1 r
~ ~ ~ r ~ , , r
f G~ , e I 1 / >a' ,~~~~y ~`~5' ? ~ ~ ~ bJ ~ ~7 ' / ~ r G i
r ~ , r _ 1~r" , ,r" ~ / } W ~ .S' 3+~°~~'~~"~' t~l.~"Oi~lLst$~,ad.tt~ .i~fl.r'ut~d
' r ' , ~ ~,-7 D--"1~3`~ f"L~`•-1513
I ~ ~ ' • ~ _ i y,/'~ C
~ ~ ~ 7 ~ `1~ S' ~°4i3'~i".~ 33.8'
~ , ~ t . ~ ,y p~ n ~ ' i 'yR+ u~J~ i r r S' ~~"e3'~1"E 5~a.ftt~'
r ,r,,... ' 1~~ _ , ~ ~ 3b ~
r ~ ~ L-~ ~ ' ~ L-~s~ ' tV 8 °i' ~ , ,iron , r~' ~ ":i2't38".ti ~~.~0'
L-f~ ~ ay
1 f 4g'• ~ ~ ti a~a
/ ~S r' ~``v~' 11 , ~ f., ~ i 'k~ 'yF 6 ~ ~'°r f
~ ~ r~ x
+ ~ r' '
~ ' ~ ~ r e~ , °
i ~ ~ r'~ -""r S "y . ~ to C~ 1 i r 2J ~ aD1 8+ 6? ~ ~ 1.~~
i ``k' .v ~ „rc"7 as ~fe . k~ t . w -`-~'",r~ ~ / ~('v r' ~ ~i~", ~p J 1 ~
~5
pj i d" ~ P ~ ~ ~~#U ~ ~ ,ia~'
rJ / `
4, ~ i ~ ~ , ,
~ ?f~, ~ f~ r~2, l ~ cry f~ ~ / ,g, ~ ;~;r
~ li l ~ I i ~ ' ~ ~ L-~~ o
Y; N 8 ° ~ o ~d~l~. LUG' ~.drvs: s:~&~'!t!'aEld ~:~77`~ ~p~1 rx: ~:'j'd; t~.~'
~.J~'fCJ~' 11G:iii1:'v, iilJti~tVt~L1' ' ~ ~ 3~~ 2q ~ , x'48" 2A' U77IlTY ~dSlt'Y1~1V'7'.
~
r<.,.. 1.23ac. • ;t p., r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,/rs e.,
/ ,y 6~ ~~~v~~ a3 1)iA6F~V'tilG" IrY 1 1 ~.'i'AJ'
r ~ ;~1:~:1.9 ;BEY
t ! ' ~ , / v: ~ ~ iiL~LLva
~ o ~ .
f ' ~~S 5f3°1~'0i"'N'~ 54.3'
f~ss~s, t"' 13~ ~fi . .Uu+~o. r ~
" ,ax"' n a ~ ~ _ r
f. ~ t : . _ ~ ? .,w pi`s" •.,~~.---i-cS
~ 25-- g. 5' 18°:3~'S5'"8~" 104.23'
i~~ a,.,1~a1: L~l,;'l;~..:w~: 1dt91 1--1~ L-d~ t~-~b1`_b ~ ~ L-Yu
~..~~C~C.
~ 41°t35'27'°A" X5.05'
, r,. G ~ dw ~ S , a 1,~1~~` ~ ,A r' ~o ~ ~ ? R' ~ ~ ~ •

~ , ,r y ° ~ ~ G r, ~ 1~. a,U.~:iB~ X1'1, ~
` v. N La ~ ° er r Q _ V ' 4t.r ~i0.1+d' ~ S 33 38'25 iY . , p ] rr L~ypy} S 33°38'28"W £3.18'
1 /i ' Q. v \ o' 5.+, k ~ ~ i ~.~9 _ _3D ~ / +4'11 _ llr``_`:~cY
to is 6ri d ~ a~°~•
0 o... ~ A~,~ f ,
~:sv; a,t..1j1~>)l'~ J i;, Ld.s:71d9i~4s~ r ~l ~ ti • ~ ° rp aj , y Y
/ ~'~w ~ ~ n. iti. ~~.1 1 t. e. T . i r a 7 .,y t~~° ~'l \~.`r ~ ~ ~ 9~ i~ ~ L Y V.~1.
/ n xT. ~ , t ~ n3 , CIL ROAD CALLS B TO .FT CIL ROAD CALLS J TO K
G ~ C9N ~,1t~ 7OUR SE BEARING DISTANCE COURSE BEARING DISTANCE
L-1 S 77003'34"Z 120,19' L-1 N 39"24'23".E 18.17'
r.~ t~• ~rY 'P L-1 J l :J ~ ' L-2 S 30040'44"E 25.18' L-2 N 57°14'23"E 46.27'
° a. ~ f1~a,.`, ti Doti 1~2>a ~dL~3li3'i S'L''!" 1'-2 s. g.~~+ 'q"F C.r r `Y.i ~y:'..,;,{ d~ P.+'.t.?Jr.i ~ L-~ 1.~ ldi ~ c CONTROL CORNER L-3 a 8602433"E 15.02' L--3 N 65°58'08"E 58.32'
1~ 3., ~,:1~ a;9 ' , 'tt ~ ' i' v+~,~'~' L-4 S 88°24'33"E 23.32' L-4 N 56°56'40"E 88.83' L-5 N 61°57'41"E 39.02' L-5 N 51°11'19"E 30.09'
° ,er. s L-5 N 6. L-6 N 70°41'49"E 22.41' L-6 N 29°35'09"E 29.45'
9e, P'i JV - ra _,1,~ 1,.s1~' L ~ ~ . `a,-'4i~; ~~.4~ I r L-7 N 5~ s d i i~ L-7 N 54050'34'"E 35.73' L-7 N 18°34'30"E 41.64'
1i. .y 't a: ~r .lo:~ aj is ~i.+' a,J,wE 7 ~b•. L'°.~ .f~ 3i . a L-9 N 3I L--8 N 32"37'00"E 49.11' L-8 N 28015'29"E 22.26'
~ 'ti°26'20° ~`~',49' ~ ,~~'t~CLYR OtCCL~d7~C L!, - N 41 L-9 N 39°05'15"E 26.08' L-9 N 51°04'42"E 25.86' -10 N 46°35'35°'E 27.02' L-10 N 76033'03"E 36.52'
1)B-lla3 FC-559 1© -11 N 65° 19'20°'E 23.90' L-11 N 84°15'50"E 38.63'
. CSC . ~j b.,, , , ~ ,~P~,. L-!2 N 6. i ul C~l,l ~dJ i~.~a .~~1r:._n8_.. d.xc~&»'~A~d.~~d:• ~ ,'Y a<."; 4.~~.3AAA~t.1~ ~ ~ d. ~ ~ . -12 N 81°21'09"E 28.65' L-12 N 75°10'14"E 27.50'
1 ° L-13 S~ 8! -13 SR 85°13'47"E 65.29' L-13 N 52°05' 17"E 25.21' -14 N 84°30'0"E 20.48'
+ , ~ , N c~°P ~ `'ti'' , -15 N 67°18'07"E 16.75' CIL ROAD CALLS L TO M
<; d er , , r > \ L-i6 N 4 , r ° 23,04' -16 N 47°58'45"E
\ i- tm] 1 -17 N 30* 13' 18"E 33.04' COURSE BEARING .DISTANCE
F; ° 18 N 23°18'47"E 65.39' -19 N 27014'25''E 18.14' L-1 N 56°09'06°°.c°, 72.64'
t~ L ~0 N 2 L .a1 `OC'`°~' X5.7;3 ~ COQ v'~•, -20 N 27°14'26"E 63.62' L-2 N 80°27'06"E 41.28'
~ ti 4 r ,.t) :V` X313 l, i~ilril~ 1?.~I,L~ ~;+~1' ~,r' \ w L-3 N 70°29'06"E 89.05' L-4 N 74°01'06"E 47.76'
t, ` L-5 N 28°47'06"E 27.82'
_ r }y. ~i~l~id~C tli~i'1:~3`dG'~' , f=~, L-6 N 09°59'06"E 57.64'
~i,., z ~k ~F.J 1 fit-@.' f! ~U.17 ~ V V 1.14 ~$1J' i"'i U~ L-7 N 33°27'06"E 60.98'
i w ~V 1 l a 31.1 t3 ` ~ t " °'~i3"'.~' 23.1~t~" t,...,1 !~t T~3"U~;`1~1''i~' C4~457' ~ ~ L-8 N 64°47'06"E 50.68' L-9 N 76°47'06"E 54.07'
L-10 N 86002VVE (8.#i2'
L -15 N 45 4'%'~~ 52.50' ° ~ ~ ~ • _ r ° . , ~ L-4 N b~ 19'48"~' 45.36' 18 1 1~ . L-11 S 78°40'54"E 106.07'
L 16 N 5.i 4d 48, B 79.64, L-5 S 89°52'43" 49.13' BR°~ ~ ~ L-17 N 53°4209 B L-8 S 88°47'44"1/ 41.23' S 4 L-12 N 66°47'06"E 80.97'
L -ib .N 44°23'27"1~ 24.85' ,~a
L - 's;~ 1V ~#a°2~ ~~~t"E 22.18' r ~
1~~~ ~U N 0'~~3? ut)"~° G4.b5 L1iLL~ t 111 ~ ~ /
i.-~~ tid l~~°1~1'~1'1"4' Z"1.03' \ ~ L'UUCf,~'L' Li~'e1tt1NG t~aa'7~t'rC~' ..-•'i Ail ,1'1',.,,1 ~ Qr: e1' 313.56' ~ _
,',,,1 la ''~+r. .t~ iL i7. ,i ~ k%Er "y=~~~!'' ,id ~~~1„ ,y 5 j N
4 . - i yy yy~, ~y ~v 4; ~L3..~. FyJ S.1 Nd tiA 'Y ~ L)~ r' ~ iK .
:i vy u } i pA P .a •eiY $d tl, e) 1,'-~ ~ :.0$}°5~'l..:.. .3N~~1)v'~l 4 ° i. ~y.,. Lei a k ~ t ~ 15,5`7' 1, 4 d~' '~~°4a~'i~° 107,96'
,p ~
t.. b ili°1'41"°~,' 111,35'

S 22°51'07"C 32.11'1' 32.67'
y~~ay~oolllll
~~~,`q ~ t I~AR lle i> ixu~,„>{~ J,. ~~:ar t~v L-`.Pu3d ~.a3ry~i, yd{oy IUiic~loe~. w'~ A °~,.°....,,Q ~i ,RID fjVSHJP CHEROKEE COUNTY', N.C.
Ian.. lsia ,:a . slit VVi; u6ui la fGt si(WU Iii ~,~~~°Q` ~ •LJ ~
air.;, ~~~s-~,~ ~ Ciaaly t.{ .;~t{ei4iyybli'~g tP{uf i:~ Ar .
' SQL r.{sa ,~~{a~3a h.. a,,„~n ~i~riiryt7n;.d r4aut r~r~ulut~s m . ' m • .
~ ~~q L-3037
®•.9 ~ S~.I SAL C~'~ ~ K TC~ Y~.~ H o; v. y ,o •.ao . . fG,.e~ o , s
~®I `LJ 99 a,ry/ ~~yp
i<~.r•~~s,-a+r>a;,Lu ,a,~,~~~~ 66111BIIq ~./~~,d..i.1Y.~~1?~ ~l.My NV~t. 26, 2005 SCALE 1" _ 1.00'
r 1NarI'a~tc f L. t;~ti«;3t., s':.J, +:roi t3Pp fhui 11815 e,lser ¢tiU'~ t~IiSa90 AF~iI®I' :~iy SU~EfV}3lpii i€{dfll lii1 Gi;ibUf 9W'V~J ffy0<i0 UP3~BP 10~ 0 10~ 10(1 200, 300
i,1;d a~i d, a,~ r, VS IUD: F,:~ae~U 1t9tirt f;#! ~Oli i z9L""ly, to~~4 311 Zx 4i tr i'G~~k~: $V,.. i'ilat YhH 1++i8ti S7Qp` t+39 L'bt Sp1 it f8yk'd
ul'r; -.isfsty ias+ ..~iuU vD ;:r~Wi. i(do-il lis{UriYlt3tii~7h k0.utlSrb 9iY L900;, Hdyd ~~IizfE ,fix {U11a; vi ~ C+I~L~~P V.~ ~ U O ~ ~ - ~ GI~PHIC SCA .C ri l ~'LA7 F _ FEET
~~~la ~ol~ ~s,. ci, ,.,i UtssQ ra ~~$~,1,Y.J~.i4a Sr,~2V Ini; 9lbl ?,^1.aa Yr Q~3 tit G_~Gi Jtl tYLrd A111) i:, a, JU 41u uaia6 i1LAt1,
e f' ui: y n f;~ ~`J , N, tit. , LUUO ~ /d~ y, , , y . _ , ~ IL1:r~T' ~~R~f1~t~~~a~r dVl itl u'-~ 4YI s. r, ,:~k 's,tis9tilu7 i"r SE'.aila~ 11 ,a HiD sii sea. S1 A~ii4 ;R~iSi" ~l ~.iLL i1J./3N~~ V 1 ~~V~ 'ENCES" - - 8 3 PG-559
,WIVTITL D "ROBERT LEDFORD " 09--18--05
1 ' i ~I1.~L.CTY EASE.~.~I" ADDL.I~ ~U L~1 ~-b

MeaLC) L. C01u)LL.L
_ ° 2857 C~~' C'1~E lfU~tPHY N.G'. 2 CAMP CRE.E'K'ROAD RPHY N.C. 28906
828--494-705 28--494-7058