20060696 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20060424

o?6? wArF9 pG
r
O jii? Y
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
May 15, 2006
DWQ# 06-0696
Mecklenburg County
Mr. Jarrod Karl
City of Charlotte, Stormwater Services
600 East Fourth St.
Charlotte, NC 28202
Subject: Waycross Drive, Charlotte
py ?_006
uc. S Atilt) ST xwMT7"rRBR"9
?TlAN05
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Karl:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to impact 5
linear feet (If) of unnamed stream to Long Creek in order to replace a culvert at 420 Waycross Drive in
Mecklenburg County, as described in your application received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on April
24, 2006. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this project is covered by Water Quality
General Certification Number 3494, which can be viewed on our web site at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. The General Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number
3 once it is issued to you by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Please note that you should get any other
federal, state or local permits before proceeding with your project, including those required by (but not limited
to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
The above noted Certification will expire when the associated 404 permit expires unless otherwise
specified in the General Certification. This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described
in your application. If you change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be required to send
us a new application for a new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the
Certification and approval letter; and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions.
In addition to the requirements of the certification, you must also comply with the following conditions:
1. Use of native vegetation and other soft streambank stabilization techniques must be used where practicable
instead of riprap or other bank hardening methods. If riprap is necessary, it shall not be placed in the stream
bed, unless approved by the DWQ.
2. Stormwater discharge structures at this site shall be constructed in a manner such that the potential receiving
streams (of the discharge) will not be impacted due to sediment accumulations, scouring or erosion of the
stream banks.
3. Upon completion of the project, the applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" form to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality. Please send photographs of
the upstream and downstream sides of each culvert site-to document correct installation, along with the
Certificate of Completion form.
4.
Continuing Compliance. The applicant (City of Charlotte) shall conduct all activities in a manner so as not to
contravene any state water quality standard (including any requirements for compliance with section 303(d)
of the Clean Water Act) and any other appropriate requirements of state and federal law. No` Carolina
?tura!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: ncwaterqulaity.org FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
If DWQ determines that such standards or laws are not being met (including the failure to sustain a
designated or achieved use) or that state or federal law is being violated, or that further conditions are
necessary to assure compliance, DWQ may reevaluate and modify this certification to include conditions
appropriate to assure compliance with such standards and requirements in accordance with 15 A NCAC
2H.0507(d). Before codifying the certification, DWQ shall notify the applicant and the US Army Corps of
Engineers, provide public notice in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0503, and provide opportunity for public
hearing in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0504. Any new or revised conditions shall be provided to the
applicant in writing, shall be provided to the United States Army Corps of Engineers for reference in any
permit issued pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and shall also become conditions of the 404
Permit for the project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You
must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition that
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714
Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless
you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
If you have any questions, please telephone Mr. Alan Johnson in the Mooresville Regional Office at 704-663-
1699 or Ms. Cyndi Karoly in the Central Office in Raleigh 919-733-9721. .
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Attachments
cc: Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville
Ian McMillan, Wetlands Unit
Land Quality, MRO
Greg Antemann
Central Files
Q
AU G 0 9 2006 -
Certificate of Completion
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS R STpR?WATER BRANCH
DWQ Project No. 0(o 0(olCounty: I?'?Q?er??rct
Applicant: o Cha1AOk} e ?LIM WA-14- 511 v ; ?S
Project Name: LAIC) 4'IcLIc4-oSS "br,,vc W(A 4e_ an L,_ e
Date of Issuance of 401 Water Quality Certification: Nla!l k5, ?L066
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules,
and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the
-- ---401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division-of Water Quality, 1621 Mail Service Center.-Raleigh.-
NC, 27699-1621. This form may be returned to DWQ by the applicant, the applicant's authorized
agent, or the project engineer. It is not necessary to send certificates from all of these.
Applicant's Certification
I, TSa-ac- -S K, , Son , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and
diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to
built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer
Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature:. Date: 4 ) 1 1 O la
Agent's Certification
I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and
diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to
built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer
Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature: Date:
If this project was designed by a Certified Professional
I, , as a duly registered Professional
(i.e., Engineer, Landscape Architect, Surveyor, etc.) in the State of North Carolina, having been
authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of the project, for the
Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the
observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to built within substantial
compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans
and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature: Registration No.: Date:
Triage Check List
Date: 4/27/06
Project Name: COCharlotte-420 Waycross Drive
DWQ#: 06-0696
County: Mecklenburg
Alan Johnson, Mooresville Regional Office
To:
60-day Processing Time: 4/24/06 - 6/22/06
From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone : [phone]
The file attached is being forwarded to you for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
Cumulative impact concern
F-1
Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks!
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
9600-G SOUTHERN PINE BOULEVARD
CHARLOTTE. NORTH CAROLINA 28273
704523-7225 • FAX [phone]
www.esinc.cc
April 20, 2005
Division of Water Quality
401/Wetlands Unit
Attention: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650
RE: 420 Waycross Drive
Environmental Permitting Document (NWP 3)
City of Charlotte Storm Water Services Department
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Karoly:

On behalf of the City of Charlotte Stormwater Services Department (CSWS), Environmental
Services, Inc. (ESI) is pleased to provide you with seven copies of the final environmental
permitting document for the aforementioned project. Should you have any questions regarding
this project, please contact the permittee:
Mr. Isaac Hinson
Charlotte Storm Water Services
600 East Fourth Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-2844
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: ihinson(a,,ci.charlotte.nc.us.
In advance, we certainly appreciate your prompt review of the environmental documentation
provided, and we look forward to hearing from you soon regarding this project.
Sincerely yours,
Q2®L'm D-? p
APR 2 4 2006
UENR - WATER QUALITY
Encl r`e)S P WD ST(0,4WATER BRAINCH
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
S. Paul Petitgout
Vice President
20060696
JACKSONVILLE 9 ST. AUGUSTINE 0 COCOA 0 JUPITER • DESTIN 0 SAVANNAH • ATLANTA 9 RALEIGH 0 CHARLOTTE • ASHEVILLE

PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
NATIONWIDE PERMIT NO.3
420 WAYCROSS DRIVE
CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
ESI Project No. ET04006.30
April 20, 2006
For
CHARLOTTE STORM WATER SERVICES
600 East Fourth Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
704-432-0966
APR
fi ,r"A?;nl l'" " 1 F
BY
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
9600-G Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-523-7225
www.esinc.cc
r
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ................................................................................. .............................................. 1
Existing Conditions .................................................................................. ..............................................
Current Land Use 2
Jurisdictional Determination. 2
Agency Correspondence -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- 3
Cultural Resources 3
Protected Species .................................................................................. ..............................................
Purpose and Need for the Project ............................................................. .............................................
Avoidance and Minimization
Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters---------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------- 5
Compensatory Mitigation ......................................................................... .............................................
References. 6
List of Attachments
Attachment A - Figure 1. USGS Site Location Map
Attachment A - Figure 2a. Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County (SSURGO database)
Attachment A - Figure 2b. Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County (SSURGO database) aerial photo
base
Attachment A - Figure 3. Jurisdictional Boundary Field Map
Attachment B - Pre-Construction Notification Application - Nationwide Permit No. 3
Attachment C - Routine On-Site Data Form
Attachment D - Request for Jurisdictional Determination Form
Attachment E - Stream Classification Forms
Attachment F - Representative Photographs
Attachment G Proposed Impacts
ii
Executive Summary
The 420 Waycross Drive project is located in the City of Charlotte, near Tom Sadler Road in
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (Attachment A - Figures 1, 2a and 2b). The project area will
encompass approximately 66 linear feet of an unnamed tributary (UT) to Long Creek. The
purpose of this project is to prevent road flooding by upgrading the existing 15-inch pipe with a
more functional 24-inch pipe, replacing the headwall and endwall associated with the pipe, and re-
working the existing rip-rap apron to prevent further stream bank erosion. ESI has been contracted
by Charlotte Storm Water Services (CSWS) to provide permitting services for this project.
The results of the on-site field investigation conducted by Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI)
indicate that there is one jurisdictional stream channel within the project limits, a UT to Long
Creek, located north of 420 Waycross Drive and transecting the site in a westerly direction
(Attachment A - Figure 3). On behalf of CSWS, ESI is submitting a Pre-Construction
Notification application in accordance with Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number 3 (Attachment B).
Existing Conditions
The 420 Waycross Drive project is located in Charlotte near Tom Sadler Road in Mecklenburg
County, North Carolina (Attachment A - Figures 1, 2a and 2b). The UT to Long Creek consists of
a slightly entrenched, west flowing channel located directly north of 420 Waycross Drive. The
existing pipe is not adequately sized to contain the 25-year storm event. The purpose of this
project is to prevent road flooding by upgrading the existing 15-inch pipe with a 24-inch pipe,
replacing the headwall and endwall associated with the pipe, and re-working the existing rip-rap to
prevent channel erosion at the outfall. ESI has been contracted by CSWS to provide permitting
services for this project. On behalf of CSWS, ESI is submitting a Pre-Construction Notification
application in accordance with Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number 3 (Attachment B).
Current Land Use
The project study area and surrounding vicinity consists primarily of residential land use.
Dominant vegetation includes American beech (Fagus grandifolia), sweet gum (Liquidambar
styraciflua), Ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana), wild grapevine (Vitis sp.), Japanese honeysuckle
(Lonicera japonica) and Chinese privet (Ligusti nz sinense). The herbaceous groundcover was
limited at the time of the survey because of seasonal conditions and heavy leaf-litter.
According to the Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County (1980), onsite soils consist of Wilkes Loam,
15 to 25 percent slopes. (Attachment A - Figures 2a and 2b). This is a well drained soil type on
ridges and narrow side slopes that exhibits moderately slow permeability.
Jurisdictional Determination
On March 27, ESI's Jeff Benton and Carrie Allison reviewed the onsite jurisdictional waters of the
U.S., as defined by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), utilizing the Routine Onsite
Determination Method. This method is defined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory, 1987). Based on this approach, there are no
jurisdictional wetland areas within the project study area. A Routine Onsite Data Form
representative of onsite non jurisdictional upland areas has been included as Attachment C.
Jurisdictional waters of the U.S. were classified according to recent North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (NCDWQ) and USACE guidance. The results of the onsite field investigation
indicate that there is one jurisdictional stream channel within the project limits, a UT to Long
Creek, located north of 420 Waycross Drive (Attachment A - Figure 3). The UT is culverted by
an existing 15-inch pipe at the Waycross Drive crossing.
Long Creek is part of the Catawba River basin (HUC 03050103) (NCDWQ 03-08-34), is classified
as "Class C" waters by the NCDWQ (NCDWQ, 2004a), and is not included on the North Carolina
303(d) Impaired Waters List (NCDWQ, 2004b). ESI is requesting written verification of the
jurisdictional determination of the UT to Long Creek (Attachment D).
The UT to Long Creek consists of a slightly entrenched channel located north of 420 Waycross
Drive. The stream enters the site from the east and flows to the west towards another UT that
flows into Long Creek. At a point approximately 10 feet downstream from the western outfall of
the culvert, the UT to Long Creek scored a 20.5 out of a possible 71.0 points on the NCDWQ
2
Stream Classification Form (Attachment E). A score of 19.0 is needed for the stream to be
considered at least intermittent in nature, and a score of 30.0 is needed for the stream to be
considered perennial in nature.
The UT to Long Creek scored a 30.0 out of a possible 100.0 points at the same point on the
USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet (Attachment E) at the same point. This worksheet
was developed by the USACE as a guide for determining whether a jurisdictional stream would be
considered important or unimportant using criteria such as flow, channel structure, aquatic habitat,
and aquatic life. The scores derived from these forms indicate that the feature present is an
unimportant, intermittent stream.
At a point approximately 10 feet upstream from the eastern inlet of the culvert the UT to Long
Creek scored a 15.5 out of a possible 71 points on the NCDWQ Stream Classification Form, and a
28 out of a possible 100 points on the USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet, indicating
that the upstream portion of the feature is ephemeral and not jurisdictional (Attachment E).
Therefore, only a small westerly portion of the hydrologic feature onsite is jurisdictional.
NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms and USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets
representative of the UT to Long Creek have been included as Attachment E. Representative
photographs depicting the stream and on-site conditions are included as Attachment F.
Agency Correspondence
Cultural Resources
ESI personnel visited the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on March 24, 2006 to review
the archaeological site files in order to determine the presence of any areas of architectural,
historic, or archaeological significance that would be affected by the project. No recorded
archaeological sites or National Register listed properties are located within 0.5-mile of the project
study area.
Protected Species
ESI personnel visited the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) offices on March
24, 2006 to determine the presence of any federally-listed species or designated critical habitat
located within the project vicinity. Based on the review of NCNHP records, three federally listed
species are located within 3 miles of the project study area. These species include the Carolina
heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata), smooth coneflower (Echinacea laevigata), and Schweinitz's
sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii).
Carolina Heelsplitter: No Effect
The Carolina heelsplitter is a freshwater mussel listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS)
as federally endangered in 1993. The species historically lived in large rivers and streams, but the
remaining populations are typically found in relatively shallow (one to four feet deep) streams.
Carolina heelsplitters require clean, free flowing water with high-oxygen content. The UT to Long
Creek does not provide suitable habitat for the Carolina Heelsplitter, however the NCNHP records
indicate that the mussel was observed within three-miles of the site in 1987.
The NCNHP written records show that the Carolina Heelsplitter was documented in Long Creek
north of the site, but the map associated with this record marks the occurrence within Paw Creek,
which is south of the site. Despite this discrepancy in the records, ESI biologists have concluded
that no Carolina Heelsplitter populations or critical habitat will be effected by the proposed
improvements. The work within the UT to Long Creek will be localized and erosion and sediment
control measures will be implemented to ensure no adverse impacts to downstream habitats or
water quality.
Smooth Coneflower: No Effect
Smooth coneflower is a perennial herb that grows up to 1.5 meters tall. This flower is typically
found in open woods, cedar barrens, roadsides, clearcuts, dry limestone bluffs, and power line
rights-of-way. The NCNHP records indicate that smooth coneflower was documented north of the
site in 1998, approximately two miles west of Shuffletown, North Carolina within a power line
right-of-way just north of Monarch Drive. This documented population, that is about 2.5 miles
from the site, will not be affected by the proposed project. In addition, no smooth coneflower or
smooth coneflower habitat was identified within the project vicinity. Therefore, this project will
have no effect on smooth coneflower or critical habitats.
Schweinitz's Sunflower: No Effect
Schweinitz's Sunflower is also a perennial herb that grows from one to two meters tall. This
species historically occupied prairie-like habitats or oak savannas that were maintained by fire,
though current habitats include roadsides, power line clearings, old pastures, woodland openings,
and other sunny or semi-sunny situations. The NCNHP records show a documented occurrence of
Schweinitz's sunflower approximately 2.5 miles northwest of the site, along SR 137. This
population will not be effected by the proposed project. Further, no Schweinitz's sunflower
populations or critical habitats were identified within the project vicinity. Therefore, this project
will not have an effect on Schweinitz's sunflower or critical habitat.
Purpose and Need for the Project
The purpose of this project is to upgrade the existing pipe to prevent road flooding. The existing
culvert consists of a 15-inch pipe that cannot adequately convey water during large rain events.
The proposed culvert is a 24-inch pipe that is designed to contain the 25-year storm event per City
of Charlotte design standards for residential roads.
Avoidance and Minimization
The majority of the proposed work will occur within the non jurisdictional, ephemeral portion of
the onsite hydrologic feature. Impacts to onsite jurisdictional waters have been minimized to the
maximum extent practicable and will only encompass a few linear feet of the total project area.
Impacts to the onsite jurisdictional stream will consist of re-working +/- 5 if of rip-rap and will not
result in the placement of additional rip-rap within the stream channel. Sediment and erosion
control measures will be implemented to avoid adverse impacts downstream.
4
Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters
The greatest extent of work onsite, including the pipe, headwall, and endwall replacement will
occur within the ephemeral, non jurisdictional portion of the hydrologic feature. The
jurisdictional, intermittent stream begins approximately 10 feet downstream from the outfall of the
existing culvert. Therefore, approximately five linear feet of the total 66 linear-foot project area
will be subject to impacts to jurisdictional waters (Attachment G). Within these five linear feet,
impacts will be limited to re-working the existing rip-rap apron and will not include the placement
of additional rip-rap within the stream channel. These impacts are expected to be minimal and
have no effect on habitats downstream.
Table 1. Summary of Proposed Impacts
Impacts under
Jurisdictional Area Activity NWP No. 3
Re-work existing rip-rap
UT to Long Creek apron as part of erosion ±5 if
control improvement
TOTAL f5 if
The proposed culvert will not be buried due to steep (5.1 %) grade and an existing 6-inch water
main (Attachment G-Pipe Profile). Please note that the existing culvert is also not buried and is
located within a non jurisdictional reach of the drainage feature.
Compensatory Mitigation
Given the limited nature of the proposed impacts, no mitigation is currently proposed for this
project.
5

REFERENCES
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. US Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual,
Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg,
Mississippi.
NC Division of Water Quality (NC DWQ). 2004a. Basinwide Information Management System
(BIMS): Stream Classification. September 2004. http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/bims/reports/basinsand
waterbodies/hydroCatawba.pdf . Downloaded January 2006.
NC Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2004b. 303(d) List. http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/
tmdl/documents/2004IRCatesaories4-7.pdf. Downloaded January 2006.
US Department of Agriculture. 1980. Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
6
ATTACHMENT A
Figures 1 - 3
I�V..-r; "!r �� (r i • Y � tt�� /..qr j '� _l 1 tIN
,A -
"ix fp� 1 �� ,/
' f 02 \. 4 (�r i �/` :l) %/�'( i'/ 1\\.;•� /' �.. i V i �1'li \��,t?j/ �•r,o „
_ la � ✓� � •��� `I�i(
CO `Z,,, ��'.J��1��»�\f \�`t/Ut��- rl�\-� _-1�;s1rl \�11 �/I �u{J,r' f:\'.ii �,�6 '�'`JlIY�•\etc:
V �l?0° sib 4 \ 14C ...+ t ;) ! r \ 1�,..\
�! a t,)I�\°�`a)' ``; �ri,'f' f1, X Bellhaven Blvd. J/ I lr � •�\ ; q � «�I �.
SV Esc �� p� ,L P eif U ,, + • ?�//j y't`.. ._,�(
�) \y ..,J�•'• /'� �t.l �",�' i7'.. , (-- 1.. i� ;-•✓-z,+� v11� ..` .1c-r't
J f 1 °I1 r ` ♦ �� , \' (e �� `moi f '
% ,,` 1 A t, i i , r! j• t
_t `• ��}J.. ,\\'tC�) r-� � - i' si . ' 1'1 I ���✓' •�--i i 1 ) \�. • i ^�1 -' ]j 1 V , �:j), /t�.;` `\ l 1 1 ,1 ' �y / /
7 � .) t� I}.��1.. f �� � Al , (''; ( � r� t � 3 � �. � N � l � � �- � , ^(�i" + ll��� / ] j� J ,.f t - r � � •;••1' •
' ''C Il,i�j'//� 'r^)S 1}1� 0% t /+ �� �4�..r \H r�b! if •l\ Cta 1•.....,•www •'� `1 - ll
r ?✓ �7LlI �) t i , t4ll'. ) L r 11/ a I4`'Coulp $ch
,� \ ..• \ I \,rjji ��/ L ,,,\ I _� I ♦rt / l /F, r. r� _.;;- � �f ;•i t• i � � \ '�
I �!/.> •rJ+r \ .�t /)�` �l l•, `�-?'�1 �1 •'�"_/tr / i'.�•� l� •�Ir
�6 �.' �OI� ir�lt t� ,tl !,i" �� .;; J� .,{ F }f I ` ••,�r • ••, •ti•-ry sf4�1r�` Y t _,jf ,•� t _ !
oqy `. ., •!\ '! /' �� \.` .''t._ .� 1 �(•. .'`� "''rte �• :•!3 ,\i'" )• • •-' .-/�, .::� .rd+.J"1 n-�'' ,.:•�,
f. r-- s' r 71i \ • ..._. - �'
• \ ,
Project Location
(420 Waycross Drive)
l t
A•/"!j� �,. I' ` ,�� .r'� + `•` i tr•.�rR\R` I � AIr�� �}/i,,,G/?',�\(r \\'�0.��(f\c''S,
PO UN
Is�),�l\ '.�`l �• /. \.,, 1�a+�C • C��>'�I I h � •sem � I � -)t „ � 1 , � r1• � )j`t �\\, r ��D) � r \ .`•�� ` �27 •\' `�f��' )SIV y�r/, '�1
t�•lIV\�t�
) '/`/.'fit t+ t�-..j; -^•�_. � -��� ' r i i �f �rir ) j i �' � r� - .� ,r `t!, r�� 1�:�j/ / �'�` 1` � f i•'' ��f_
r71Uf "���^,I \'�'• - - fr\ �t,/t �R'' ( f .,'. 5 IJ�''t`yC-�^__�,�
•'.il �. �� ,. . //�-`,'.'b' •yr 1 ��� \ �J•� v •a. •.� il) t , "��)9 �"�� t ,•l�/ -fit ro';
0 4 \ �l,) r.� ) _ _��• r (ice'_ 1 1> ;/. ` \ I� r✓ �Fp W
c" ,�r� �i�f ,_,%, • ( � `./ `�; ) )� �i //"`- �� (; -• i �, lij ,, It' � •� r. , f�y.'1jj11 ✓, 1^V � , Nl� � �
S• w ! �` 1 �\ ) / i 4 •.t \•.%.��/ i +/ . ti 1t �'"' 1 t " 4 Ytl I��w /` �: W �•J'V/ '' �1' \�'+ i i
State Highway 27 ;� �• ;a ; ���'t.
�• ;��it•✓'- J ; >�\ ;(.� i .`,. x X31.
r10,
♦ w �� t47 •• Wit` ��t •'\ \ ; I :. 'r - - ' ,rr�( 'Yiilt �• '•' • f�„dk.� ,.•
�. \ fr ry+�• 4 l t \ r • r W\, : r: '••. .- L �.
. i',1 ,F i - _ : O J` a • .1\ ' t -� I 1 '.f, , \ ` i � - •'moi. : -'�� -.-_•• �s.%
1 ) (l.y • � '.� � \ � 1. + •\ -s » iti.
t ( 9hsllii• tlt' �k'LL � ? `:i1, � �... < ✓ 7, / ��� ,•k:E�e- , ..•
\ � •,,, �I+, rad\ .� It � „� � � ^ �, _ , r�� �. ,-- �
w r�Jr.� ,R : h ;-A ' 1+ •'. r r� i y ` . \ • ` . ..: :!� i�1n V1� %t
�' }fob
�
Kn1• 'r x /
Feet /'� t •� •, 1 , � '���`F �/; K ` r•
1 inch equals 2,000 feet `l C)�i ✓=^%�{ � (t._��%J ijt .%�• \-.., ie i ,:. 1 ,
Sources: Source: NCDOT GIS 1:24K-)�1�(1fi{ �y � tic• ._ fel ` ;� • � 1 _- •'•
County Digital Raster Graphics. `'�," !raj%'� /.�r t , `��� ._. • 1
GCS. NC State Plane NAD03 FIPS 3200 �/ �, .. I � , /, • ' � �:
Dlscleimer Inlorrrmt— relxesmted an Iris map was derived �. /1 +. /'/ / `f • \1 v \ `
from secondarydata sources and is Io he ussd for gererel
plenrirgpwposesonN. Nowarranhesorreprusenfat—ol `l ��(( (�1�� � ��/ / l 1 t�•• ..��•�f� ,,,,�•
eccurncy nm oxlroexed nr impiad
:n
ENVIRONMENTAL Project: ET04006.30
SERVICES, INC. Project Location Map
9660-G Southern Pine Blvd. 420 Waycross Drive Date: Apr 2006
Cherbtte, NC 28273
[phone] Drwn/Chkd: MCS/JB
1704)523-7226 FAX Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
wv. •w. ar Wormeneueroioea.corn Figure: 1

Wh11
w
hA
i
l _
EnD
Project Location
Streams
— Roads
0 500 1,000
Feel
1 inch equals 1,000 feet
Sources: NRCS Soil Survey.
GCS: NC State Plane NAD83, FIPS 3200
Disclaimer. Informalion repreaenled on this map was derived
from semndary data sous— and is to be used for general
pinnnmg purpoaee only. N—eanbes or mpresontatbns M
is.r.—y ere ii.pressed or implmd.
ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES, INC.
9660-0 Southam Pine EINd.
Chli lta, NC 26273
[phone]
[phone] FAX
waw amYonmertalsarvices.—
rojadUOKNIIE-M400M31WIg2a.rtad. 04101ill 1:00 Pm
20
m
Um ranch d
"..= NRCS Soil Survey
- I DSL NAME, FULLNAME
1 , ® ApB, Appling sandy loam
420 Waycross Drive 111111111 Al Appling sandy loam
/ } L7 CeB2, Cecil sandy clay loam
S Eno F1CeD2, Cecil sandy clay loam
„l l CUB, Cedl-Urban land complex
CW Cecil -Urban land complex
1-7 DaB, Davidson sandy day loam
CI DaD, Davidson sandy clay loam
-- --Y- - DaE, Davidson sandy day loam
-H ,B ESB, Enon Bandy loam
En D, Enon sandy loam
0 GeB2, Georgeville slaty slit loam
i• Ge D2, Georgeville slaty sill loam
0 GoB, Goldston silty clay loam
0 GoD, Goldston silty day loam
i Cl �' M Hal Helena sandy loam
En D ■ HUB, Helena -Urban land complex
I. nH I ■ kA, Iredell fine sandy loam
0 IrB, Iredell Tine sandy loam
Project: ET04006.30
NRCS Soil Survey
420 Waycross Drive Date: Apr 2006
Dr
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Figure:
d: MCS/JB
2a
0 l Iredell-Urban lend complex
B
® Ll Lignum gravelly silt loam
• '!
0 MO, Monacan soils
• -"`--
0 MS, Monacan soils and Arenls
a MeB, Mecklenburg fine sandy loam
■ Mal Mecklenburg fine sandy loam
-
® MkB, Mecklenburg -Urban land complex
0 P83, Pacolet-Udorthents complex
1
0 PaE, Pacolet sandy loam
0 Pa F, Pacolet sandy loam
\
■ Fill, Pits
0 UL, Udorthenls, loamy
■ U0, Udorthents, sanitary landfill
1
® Ur, Urban lend
EnD
0 VaB, Vance sandy loam
\ t
0 VeD, Vance sandy loam
-
■ Will Wilkes loam
WkD, Wilkes loam
WkE, Wilkes loam
CeE12 -
c •
\
■Ill Wilkes loam
� WuD, Wilkes -Urban lend complex
Cub
0w, Water
Project: ET04006.30
NRCS Soil Survey
420 Waycross Drive Date: Apr 2006
Dr
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Figure:
d: MCS/JB
2a

W �
Q 4 -
Project Location
Streams
Roads ' E
j� Soils (Labeled)
100 200
1
Feet EnB
1 inch equals 200 teat
Sources: NRCS Soil Survey.' I
GCS: NC State Plane NAD83, FIPS 3200
Disclaimer. Information represented on the map was derived nl 9
som secondary data sources and le to be used for general
planarg pixpneesonly. Nowarrantiesoriepresentat—or
accuracy are expressed or implied.

Note: Jurisdictional waters of the US were investigated by
Envrbnmentel Services, Inc. (ESI), on 27 Mardi 2006,
Jursidictional areas have not been delineated nor verified by
the US Army Corps of Engineers.
JD
A
4
QPhoto Documentation
Point
A SC points
A JD point
Q Project Location
Parcels
Buildings
Perennial Stream
-•••• Ephemeral Stream
-•- Intermittent Stream
Roads
"WW4L;7p
Feet
I Inch equals 75 feet
Sources: GIS Layers provided by
Meddenburg County Land Use
and Environmental Services, Inc. (2000)
GCS: NC State Plane NAD83, FIPS 3200
Disclaimer. Information represented on We map was derived
from sscandary data sources and Is to be used for general
planning pwposes only. No wenaniles or representations of
sccuracy am expressed or implied.
O

ENVIRONMENTAL Project: ET04006.30
SERVICES, INC. Approximate Jurisdictional Boundary Field Map
Date: Apr
WMG 3outhem Pine Blvd.
Ctsrlatb, NC 28273 420 Waycross Drive 2006
°041 s23-n26 Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Drwn/Chkd: MCS/JB
t7o+I z3-nze FAX
www.envkdmentebsrioes.arn Figure: 3
o
m.
ATTACHMENT B
Pre-Construction Notification Form
Nationwide Permit Number 3
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide Permit No. 3
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
? 0
II. Applicant Information R ?OJ)
1. Owner/Applicant Information APR 2 4 2006
Name: City of Charlotte Storm Water Services, Contactila?rIcan
SAt. t ORWiATR FIRa?NCH
,Mailing Address: 600 East Fourth Street VIr ILAN
Charlotte NC 28202
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: ihinson(a-)ci.charlotte.nc.us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address: _
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: 420 Waycross Drive
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 03104112
4. Location
County: Mecklenburg Nearest Town: Charlotte
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From I-77 N in Charlotte, take exit
nine and head west on Freedom Drive. At approximately 5.8 miles, bear left onto Mount
Holly Road. Continue on Mount Holly Road for approximately 1.4 miles, then turn right
onto Tom Sadler Road. Travel approximately 0.6 mile, then turn left onto Waycross Drive.
Project is located on the left at 420 Waycross Drive.
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
5. Property size (acres): < 1 acre residential parent parcel
6. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Long Creek
7. River Basin: Catawba (HU# 03050103) (NCDWQ: 03-08-34) (SIN#: 11-120-7)
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.eiir.state.ne.us/admiii/maps/.)
8. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The project study area consists of an unnamed tributary (UT)
to Long Creek. The project study area and surrounding vicinity consists primarily of
residential land use.
9. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The UT to
Long, Creek consists of an entrenched, west flowing channel located directly north of 420
Waycross Drive. The existing pipe is too small to accommodate the 25-year storm event and
is. being replaced to prevent road flooding during intense storm events. Replacing the
existingL 15-inch pipe with a 24-inch pipe , installing a new headwall and endwall, and re-
working the existing rip-rap are proposed. A track hoe will be used for installation.
10. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of this project is to upgrade the
existing_piye to prevent road flooding. The existing culvert consists of a 15-inch pipe that
cannot adequately convey water during large rain events. The proposed culvert is a 24-inch
pipe that is designed to contain 25-year storm events per the City of Charlotte design standards
for residential roads.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
There are no future plans for this area.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Proposed impacts include: ±5 linear feet
of iurisdictional stream impacts as a result of re-working the existing rip-rap apron. All other
work will occur in non-jurisdictional waters. The proposed culvert will not be buried due to
steep (5.1 %) grade and an existing 6-inch water main. Please note that the existing culvert is
also not buried and is located within a non-jurisdictional reach of the drainage feature.
1. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact Area of Located within Distance to
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact 100-year Floodplain** Nearest Stream Type of Wetland***
(indicate on map) (acres) (yes/no) (linear feet)
N/A
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at httn://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: N/A
Total area of wetland impact proposed: N/A
2. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on map) (linear feet) Before Impact leasespecify)
Re-working the
Site i existing rip-rap f5 if UT to Long Creek 16 feet Intermittent
apron
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
darns (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.tonozone.com,
www.mapguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: ±5 linear feet
3. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact Area of Name of Waterbody
. Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact
(if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on map) (acres) bay, ocean, etc.)
N/A
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A
Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The majority of the proposed work will occur within the non-jurisdictional, ephemeral portion of
the onsite hydrologic feature. Impacts to onsite jurisdictional waters have been minimized to the
maximum extent practicable and will only encompass a few linear feet of the total project area.
Impacts to the onsite jurisdictional stream will consist of re-working +/- 5 if of rip-rap and will
not result in the placement of additional rip-rap within the stream channel. Sediment and erosion
control measures will be implemented to avoid adverse impacts downstream.
VIII. Mitigation
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Given the limited nature of the proposed impacts, no mitigation is currently being proposed
for this project.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at littp://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/wrp/index.litm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers. N/A
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 N/A 3 N/A
2 N/A 1.5 N/A
Total N/A N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Sources of nearbv impervious cover include roads. drivewavs. and rooftops. This proiect will
not cause an increase in the impervious coverage of the proiect area.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Construction is scheduled to begin following the recei-t of the appropriate permits.

-) - Q
ApplicA*t/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
ATTACHMENT C
Routine On-Site Data Form
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 420 Waycross Drive Date: 3-27-06
Applicant/Owner: City of Charlotte Storm Water Services County: Mecklenburg
Investigator: Environmental Services, Inc. State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? r,-/] Yes No Community ID: mixed hardwood
Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? ?Yes F11 No Transect ID: n/a
Is the area a potential problem area (If needed, explain)? Plot ID: upland
?Yes n- No

VEGETATION
DOMINANT STRATUM INDICATOR DOMINANT STRATUM INDICATOR
PLANT SPECIES PLANT SPECIES
1. American beech tree FACU 7. bedstraw herb NI
Fagus grandifolia Galium sp.
2. sweetgum tree FAC+ 8. Japanese honeysuckle vine FAC-
Liquidambar styracii lua Lonicera japonica
3. ironwood tree FAC 9. grape vine FAC
Car inus caroliniana Vitis SP.
4. Chinese privett shrub FAC 10.
Ligustrum sinense
5. ironwood shrub FAC 11.
Carpinus caroliniana
6. henbitdeadnettle herb
I NI
I 12.
F i
Lamium amplexicaule
fft of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (Excluding FAC-): 56% Fac Neutral Test:
(includes FAC+ and wetter)
Remarks The hydrophytic vegetation criterion has been met.
HYDROLOGY
? RECORDED DATA (DESCRIBE IN REMARKS): WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS
Primary Indicators:
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge ? Inundated
? Aerial Photographs ? Saturated in Upper 12, Inches
? Other ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
Q NO RECORDED DATA AVAILABLE ? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
FIELD OBSERVATIONS Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 0" ? Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >18" ? FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 16"
Remarks: The hydrologic criterion has not been met.
SOILS
MAP UNIT NAME (Series and Phase):
Mapped as Wilkes Series DRAINAGE CLASS: well drained
TAXONOMY (SUBGROUP):
T is Hapludalfs FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Confirm Mapped Type?
? Yes No
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth (inches) Horizon Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist) Mottle Color
(Munsell Moist) Mottle
Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0-4 l OYR 3/2 sandy loam
4-18+ unconsolidated fill

HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS:
? Histosol
? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon
? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Reducing Conditions
? Aquic Moisture Regime
? Sulfidic Odor
? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Listing on National Hydric Soils List
? Listed on State or Local Hydric Soils List
? Gleyed or Low Chroma
? Color
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The hydric soil criterion has not been met.
UIFTT ANTI TIFTFRMTNATTnm
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Q Yes ? No Is this Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? ? Yes 2 No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? ? Yes No
Remarks: Data point is non jurisdictional.
ATTACHMENT D
Request for Jurisdictional Determination Form
REQUEST FOR JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
DATE: April 20, 2006
COUNTY Mecklenburg County, NC TOTAL ACREAGE OF TRACT < 1 acre
PROJECT NAME (if applicable) 420 Waycross Drive
PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT (name, address and phone):
Charlotte Storm Water Services
POC: Mr. Isaac Hinson at [phone]
600 East Fourth Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
NAME OF CONSULTANT, ENGINEER, DEVELOPER (if applicable):
Environmental Services Inc.
POC: Mr. Paul Petitizout at [phone]
9600-G Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
STATUS OF PROJECT (check one):
( ) On-going site work for development purposes
(X) Project in planning stages
(Type of project: NWP 3
( ) No specific development planned at present
( ) Project already completed
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED:
Check items submitted - forward as much information as is available. At a minimum, the following first
two items must be forwarded.
(X) USGS Site Location Map (Attachment A - Figure 1)
(X) NRCS Soil Survey (Attachment A - Figures 2a and 2b)
(X) Approximate Jurisdictional Boundary Field Map (Attachment A - Figure 3)
(X) Pre-Construction Notification Application (Attachment B)
(X) Routine On-Site Data Form (Attachment C)
(X) Steam Classification Forms (Attachment E)
(X) Representative Photographs (Attachment F)
(X) Agency Correspondence (Report)
(X) Proposed Impacts (Attachment G)
Signature of Property wner or Authorized Agent
Mr. Isaac Hinson
ATTACHMENT E
Stream Classification Forms
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Charlotte Storm Water Services 2. Evaluator's name: Environmental Services Inc.
3. Date of evaluation: March 27, 2006
5. Name of stream: UT to Long Creek
7. Approximate drainage area: 6 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 20 feet (Reach A)
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 35.2916°N
4. Time of evaluation: 9:00 am
6. River basin: Catawba
8. Stream order: I"
10. County: Mecklenburg
12. Subdivision name (if any): N/A
Longitude (ex. -77.556611): 80.9536°W
Method location determined (circle): GPS o o Shee Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other:
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): From I-77 N .
in Charlotte take exit nine and head west on Freedom Drive. At approximately 5.8 miles, bear left onto Mount Holly Road. Continue
on Mount Holly Road for approximately 1.4 miles, then turn right onto Tom Sadler Road. Travel approximately 0.6 mile, then turn
left onto Waycross Drive. Project is located on the left at 420 Waycross Drive.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Re-work existing rip-rap.
15. Recent weather conditions: Little to no rainfall within last 48 hours.
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Channel slightly entrenched with very little flow.
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES 0 If yes, estimate the water surface area: N/A
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES ©O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES ©O
21. Estimated watershed land use: 90 % Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
% Forested % Cleared / Logged 10 % Other (vacant)
22. Bankfull width: 2' 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2.5'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) ? Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic
cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section.
Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the
stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total
score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 30 Comments: This evaluation was performed approximately 10' below the
outfall of a culvert under Waycross Drive (Reach A).
Evaluator's Signature Date March 27, 2006
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the data required by the
United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is
subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call
919-876-8441 x.26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE
# SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain

1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
1
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)

2 Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
2
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 2
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 2
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
>+ 5 Groundwater discharge 0-5 0-4 0-4 1
E-4 (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
a
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
1
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
Entrenchment / floodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 0
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0-6 0-4 0-2 0
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 1
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 2
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0-5 2
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 1
yi (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
F
13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
2
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)

14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
3
H (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
4
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0- 5 0-6 1
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)

17 Habitat complexity 0-6 0-6 0-6 2
varied habitats = max points)
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent
,
18 Canopy coverage over streambed 0-5 0-5 0-5 1
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 1
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
1
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)

21 Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
0 22 Presence of fish 0-4 0-4 0-4 0
p
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 0
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 30
*These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
Y _
1
M
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Charlotte Storm Water Services 2. Evaluator's name: Environmental Services Inc.
3. Date of evaluation: March 27, 2006
5. Name of stream: UT to Long Creek
4. Time of evaluation: 9:30 am
6. River basin: Catawba
7. Approximate drainage area: 6 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 20 feet (Reach B)
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
8. Stream order: 1st
10. County: Mecklenburg
12. Subdivision name (if any): N/A
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 3 5.2914°N Longitude (ex. -77.556611): 80.95310W
Method location determined (circle): GPS o o Shee Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other:
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): From I-77 N
in Charlotte take exit nine and head west on Freedom Drive. At approximately 5.8 miles, bear left onto Mount Holly Road. Continue
on Mount Holly Road for approximately 1.4 miles then turn right onto Tom Sadler Road. Travel approximately 0.6 mile, then turn
left onto Waycross Drive Proiect is located on the left at 420 Waycross Drive.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): N/A
15. Recent weather conditions: Little to no rainfall within last 48 hours.
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Channel slightly entrenched with very little flow.
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES ®O If yes, estimate the water surface area: N/A
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES ®O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES ®O
21. Estimated watershed land use: 90-% Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
% Forested % Cleared / Logged 10 % Other (vacant)
22. Bankfull width: 1.5' 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic
cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section.
Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the
stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total
score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 28 Comments: This evaluation was performed approximately 10' above a
culvert under Waycross Drive (Reach B)
Evaluator's Signature Date March 27. 2006
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the data required by the
United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is
subject to•USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call
919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE
# SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain

1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
1
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 2
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 2
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 2
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
5 Groundwater discharge 0-5 0-4 0-4 0
E-4 (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
-4
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
1
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
Ei Entrenchment / floodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 1
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0-6 0-4 0-2 0
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 1
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 2
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0-5 1
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 2
i (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)

13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14 Root depth and density on banks 0-3 0-4 0-5 1
F (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
4
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0- 3 0- 5 0- 6 0
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)

1 Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
2
varied habitats = max points)
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent
,
18 Canopy coverage over streambed 0-5 0-5 0-5 1
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 1
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5 0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)

21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
0 22 Presence of fish 0-4 0-4 0-4 0
p
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 1
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 28
*These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
Nortn Garouna uivision of vvater Uuauty - btream menutication rorm; version .s. i
Date: 3/27/06 Project: 420 Waycross Drive Latitude: 35° 17'29"N
Evaluator: ESI Site: UT to Long Creek (Reach A) Longitude: 80° 57' 13"W
Total points:
Streams are at least intermittent if JCounty: Mecklenburg Other: Mountain Island Lake, NC Quad
>=19 or erennial if>=30. 20.5
A. Geomorphology subtotal = 11.5 Absent Weak Moderate Strong'
1*. Continuous bed and bank 00 01 02 0 3
2. Sinuosity 00 E) 1 02 03
3. In-channel structure: riffle pool sequence 00 Q 1 02 03
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 00 01 Q 2 03
5. Active/relic floodplain 00 0 1 .02 03
6. Depositional bars or benches 00 01 02 03
7. Braided channel 00 01 02 03
8. Recent alluvial deposits 00 01 02 03
9*. Natural levees 00 01 02 03
10. Headcuts 00 01 02 03
11. Grade controls 00 00.5 E) 1 01.5
12. Natural valley and drainageway 00 0 0.5 01 01.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing USGS or NRCS
map or other documented evidence.
O No = 0
0 Yes = 3
'Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R 14vr1rnlnnv ctthtntnl = d
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 00 01 02 03
15. Water in channel and >48 hrs since rain, or Water in channel
- dry or growing season 00 01 02 03
16. Leaflitter 01.5 01 E) 0.5 00
17. Sediment on plants 00 00.5 01 01.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (wrack lines) 00 G) 0.5 01 01.5
19. Hydric soils (redoxomorphic features) present? 0 No = 0 0 Yes = 1.5
C Rinlnnv suhtntal = S
20*. Fibrous roots in channel 03 (F) 2 01 00
21*. Rooted plants in channel 03 G) 2 01 00
22. Crayfish (D 0 00.5 01 C) 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 0 01 02 03
24. Fish 00 00.5 01 01.5
25. Amphibians 00 00.5 01 01.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 00 00.5 01 0 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 0 00.5 01 0 1.5
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus 00 00.5 01 01.5
(E) FAC 0 FACW Q OBL 0 SAV 0 Other
29*. Wetland plants in streambed
0.5 0.75 1.5 2.0 0
-hems zu-CI locus un trte presence ,i upiai w piai ¢s, "e]O ca 1-- un a ie pi ex4111 11 eyuanI Ii Nmnm
Dotes: This evaluation was performed approximately 10 ft. below the outfall of a culvert
under Waycross Drive (Reach A).
North carollna uiviston or water Uua
Date: 3/27/06
Evaluator: ESI
Total points:
Streams are at least intermittent if
75.5
>=19 or erenniaiif>=30.
- >iream ioenuncauon corm; version o. t
Project: 420 Waycross Drive Latitude: 35° 17'29"N
Site: UT to Long Creek (Reach B) Longitude: 80° 57' 12"W
Mecklenburg Other: Mountain Island Lake, NC Quad
A. Geomorphology subtotal = 8 Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1 *. Continuous bed and bank 00 01 (F} 2 03
2. Sinuosity 00- E) 1 02 03
3. In-channel structure: riffle pool sequence C3 0 01. 02 03
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 00 C) 1 02 03
5. Active/relic floodplain 00 0 1 02 03
6. Depositional bars or benches 00 0 1 02 03
7. Braided channel 00 01 02 03
8. Recent alluvial deposits 00 O 1 02 03
9*. Natural levees 00 01 02 03
10. Headcuts 0 0 01 02 03
11. Grade controls 00 Q 0.5 01 01.5
12. Natural valley and drainageway 00 Q 0.5 01 01.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing USGS or NRCS
map or other documented evidence.
0 No = 0
O Yes = 3
'Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions to manual
R 4lvrlm0nnv cnhtntal = A
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 00 01 02 03
15. Water in channel and >48 hrs since rain, or Water in channel
- dry or growing season 00 O 1 02 03
16. Leaflitter 01.5 01 0 0.5 00
17. Sediment on plants 00 O 0.5 01 01.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (wrack lines) 00 (D 0.5 01 01.5
119. Hydric soils (redoxomorphic features) present? 0 No = 0 0 Yes = 1.5
r CCnhnv el1hfnfn1 = 4 ri
20*. Fibrous roots in channel 03 02 0 1 00
21*. Rooted plants in channel 03 (E) 2 01 00
22. Crayfish 0 0 00.5 01 01.5
23. Bivalves 00 01 02 03
24. Fish 0 0 00.5 01 01.5
25. Amphibians (] 0 00.5 01 01.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 00 00.5 01 01.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton E) 0 00.5 01 01.5
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus 0 0 00.5 01 01.5
(D FAC 0 FACW 0 OBL Q SAV ICJ Other
29*. Wetland plants in streambed
0.5 0.75 1.5 2.0 0
-Items zu-zl Locus on the presence of upiano pierns, neni to iwwen uu a ie p? eaenw - -1-- vi wcua? w ym' -
Notes: This evaluation was performed approximately 10 ft. above a culvert under Waycross
Drive (Reach B).
ATTACHMENT F
Representative Photographs
ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES, INC.
95040 BooUem Pine Boulevard
ChadoBe, Nodh CeroNne 28273
[phone]
[phone] Fax
wwMiernYOr, ,, ftj'*r' Saka.0=
Site
420 We
Mecklenburg
;s Drive
North Carolina
2006
Photo 1: View of the UT to Long Creek, looking upstream at the intermittent/ephemeral break.
Photo 4: View of the LIT to Long Creek as it
of the project site.
ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES, INC.
9WG-G Southem Pine Boulevard
ChariMe. North Carolina 20273
(704) 5217225
[phone] Fax
www:airWorxrarvalasrvlos W.com
into a perennial stream at the western end
Site Photographs
420 Wavcross Drive
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Date: Apr 2006
Drwn/Chkd: JMB/SPP
Photo Plate: 2
Photo 3: View of the LIT to Long Creek, looking downstream along intermittent reach.
ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES, INC.
0500-G 0outhem Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, Norlh Carolina 25273
[phone]
[phone] Pax
v aFY
IVWW B/1Vke/aflenhlaO/VaeatlC.00m
Site Photographs
420 Waycross Drive
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Date: Apr 2006
Plate:
Photo 5: View of the ephemeral reach, looking east from a culvert under Waycross Drive.
ATTACHMENT G
Proposed Impacts
? a
MON
Elevation
N W A (TI O% V 00 ?O O
O O O O O O O O O O O
O O. O O O O O O O O O
O
l
l rn
T p X O
H p O
O O I
C
O_
"S
N
O oo Q.
..? O O
O
O
-fi o-a P 'fl
co ? rn
O p p p
O
O
w 3 i ui H
-°+ Q- v m
0 O co `it
? N
O a
fi W
-o O a
c
o
a'
O
0
3
U7
O
{ Q o
0 LM
'Cf p ?
. O
42o. WAS`

I
f

Legend
® EasementTrac{cing /V final streams
n OpenCalls tl inven In
¦ inven pt raindrop
,,V Gravity Mains /At stbuffer
GridA. A/ streams
j'I! Grice /J streets major
j -v GridC / topoeast
/J Private Sts topowest
Streets [] 01032006
IV Water fines CMUD ® 303d Imp St
SWIM buffer .
Storm Water CIPs
? basin test
bldgotln 2002
? exl00sectl-4
ful00 sectl -4
imperv
parcel tax
® cashed
8 zoning
j
3
Scale: 1"= 60'
0 20 40 60