Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20060689 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20060424Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director Division of Water Quality May 22, 2006 DWQ Project # 06-0689 Henderson County Marisue Hilliard, Forest Supervisor National Forests in North Carolina Post Office Box 2750 Asheville, NC 28802-2750 Subject Property: North Hills Trial Bridge I __3 k[2rr_1[10W1;P' P MAY 3 0 2006 DENR - WATER QUALITY WETLANDS AND sTQRmWATEi BRANCH Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions Dear Mr. Hilliard: You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill within or otherwise impact 73 linear feet of streams for the purpose of stream stabilization at the subject property, as described within your application received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on May 1, 2006. After reviewing your application, we have decided these impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3494 (GC3494). The Certification (s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 3 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE). In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, Non-discharge, and stormwater regulations. Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit. This approval is for the purpose that you described in your application. If you change your project beyond this approval, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below. The Additional Conditions of the Certification are: 401 Wetlands Certification Unit 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Phone: 919-733-1786 / FAX 919-733-6893 / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.uslncwetlands An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper North Hills Trail Bridge Page 2 of 6 May 22, 2006 1. Impacts Approved The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are approved including incidental impacts: Amount Approved (Units) Plan Location or Reference Stream 73(feet) N. Mills River 2. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards: a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual. b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project. c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual. d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act. 3. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur. North Hills Trail Bridge Page 3 of 6 May 22, 2006 4. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land Resources has released the project. 5. Certificate of Completion Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650. 6. Construction in this creek and disturbance within a 25-foot trout buffer should be avoided during the October 15 to April 15 trout spawning period to avoid adverse effects of sediment on eggs and larvae. 7. Sediment and erosion control measures must be implemented prior to construction and maintained on the sites to minimize sediment in downstream areas. Seeding for a temporary cover of wheat, millet, or similar annual grain or permanent herbaceous cover should occur on all bare soil within five (5) days of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion control. The projects should be accomplished in stages instead of leaving large tracts exposed to further storm events. Erosion control matting should be used in conjunction with appropriate seeding on disturbed soils in steep slope and riparian areas. Matting should be secured in place with staples, stakes, or, wherever possible, live stakes of native trees. Straw mulch and tall fescue should not be used in riparian areas. In addition, because of an anticipated difficulty in establishing ground cover during the winter, reseeding should be conducted, as necessary, in the spring-time with a native annual and perennial seed mix with a temporary nursery crop of wheat, millet or other grain. 8. Only clean, large, angular rock, large woody material, or other natural stream design materials and techniques should be used for bank stabilization. Rock should not be placed in the stream channel in a manner that constricts stream flow or that will impede aquatic life movements during low flow conditions. Filter cloth should be placed behind large rock that is used for bank stabilization. Properly designed rock vanes should be constructed wherever appropriate on bank stabilization and channel realignment stream reaches to improve channel stability and to improve aquatic habitat. Root wads should be installed low enough in the bank so that a significant portion (at least one-third) the root wad is inundated during normal flows. Should large, angular rock, large woody material, or other natural stream design materials and techniques not be sufficient for long term stability of the stream and adjacent roadway, and concrete be incorporated into the design, measures which would prevent surface waters from coming into contact with live concrete. North Hills Trail Bridge Page 4 of 6 May 22, 2006 9. The channel should be restored to a more stable condition. However, under no circumstances should river rock, sand or other materials be dredged from the stream channel under authorization of this permit except, if necessary, in the immediate vicinity of the eroding banks for the explicit purpose of anchoring stabilizing or flow/grade control structures or for reestablishing the natural and more stable stream channel dimensions. Stream bed materials are unstable in flowing- water situations and are unsuitable for bank stabilization. In stream dredging has catastrophic effects on aquatic life and disturbance of the natural form of the stream channel can cause downstream erosion problems. The natural dimension, pattern, and profile of the stream upstream and downstream of the permitted area should not be modified by widening the stream channel or changing its depth. No backfilling of stream bed materials is allowed under this authorization. 10. Stabilization measures should only be applied on or near existing erosion sites, leaving other stable stream bank areas in a natural condition. Grading and backfilling should be minimized and tree and shrub growth should be retained where possible to ensure long term availability of stream bank cover for aquatic life and wildlife. Backfill materials should be obtained from upland sites except in cases where excess stream bed materials are available. Berms should not be permitted because they block the floodplain, constrict and accelerate flood flows, and often fail and sometimes impede drainage during large flood events. 11. Repairs to eroded banks should be conducted in a dry work area. Sandbags or other clean diversion structures should be used to minimize excavation in flowing water. Channel realignments should be constructed by excavating the new channel from downstream to upstream before connecting it to the old channel. 12. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank whenever possible. All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters should be inspected and maintained regularly to prevent contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids or other toxic materials. Equipment used in stream channel must be clean, new or low hour equipment. Exposure of equipment to surface waters must be minimized to the maximum extent possible. 13. Disturbed stream banks and a 25-foot vegetated zone (as required under the Trout regulations), or the widest width that is practical under the site conditions, must be restored along the construction sites to natural riparian conditions with native trees and shrubs (e.g., silky dogwood, rhododendron, dog hobble, red maple, silky willow, tag alder, black willow, sycamore) to provide long-term bank stability and stream shading. Note, silky dogwood, silky willow and black willow can be planted as live stakes collected during the dormant growing season. Cuttings should be randomly planted on four (4) foot centers from the waters edge to the top of the bank. Trees should be planted on ten (10) to twelve (12) foot centers. Stream banks in these areas should also be seeded with a native annual and perennial seed mix with a temporary nursery crop of wheat, millet or other grain. Replanting of vegetation within disturbed areas located within 25 feet of the streambank associated with any land disturbing activity, repair, replacement and/or maintenance must be done in a manner consistant with the Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration immediately following construction. (Please see attached.) North Hills Trail Bridge Page 5 of 6 May 22, 2006 14. If pasture along the stream is to be used for grazing, a fence must be constructed outside of the riparian zone and the stream to prevent livestock from entering these areas. 15. Diffuse Flow All constructed stormwater conveyance outlets shall be directed and maintained as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through the protected riparian zones such that it will not re-concentrate before discharging into a stream. If this is not possible, it may be necessary to provide stormwater facilities that are considered to remove nitrogen. This may require additional approval from this Office. 16. Turbidity Standard The turbidity standard of 10 NTUs (Nephelometric Turbidity Units) shall not be exceeded as described in 15 A NCAC 213. .0200. Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices must be used to meet this standard. 17. No Sediment and Erosion Control Measures in Wetlands Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land Resources or locally delegated program has released the project. Violations of any condition herein set forth and may result in criminal and/or civil pens proposed impacts or to conduct impacts tc as authorized by this Certification, shall E Permit. may result in revocation of this Certification ties. The authorization to proceed with your waters as depicted in your application and Kpire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 1506 of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing. North Hills Trail Bridge Page 6 of 6 May 22, 2006 This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Kevin Barnett in the DWQ Asheville Regional Office at 828-296-4657. Sincerely, for Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director Division of Water Quality AW Klkhb Enclosures: GC 3494 Certificate of Completion Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration cc: Lynn L. Hicks, P.E., US Forest Service Post Office Box 2750 Asheville, NC 28802-2750 USACE Asheville Regulatory Field Office DWQ 401 Central Office DLR Asheville Regional Office David McHenry, NC Wildlife Resources Commission File Copy Central Files Filename: 06-0689.USFS.NorthHillsTrailBridge.Approval Triage Check List Date: 4/27/06 Project Name: North Hills Trail Bridge Construction DWQ #:06-0689 County: Henderson Kevin Barnett, Asheville Regional Office To: 60-day Processing Time: 4/24/06. to 6/22/06 From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone: (919) 733-9721 The file attached is being forwarded to you for your evaluation. Please call if you need assistance. ? Stream length impacted ? Stream determination Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps ? Minimization/avoidance issues ? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman) ? Pond fill Mitigation Ratios ? Ditching ? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable? ? Check drawings for accuracy Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings? ? Cumulative impact concern a ? ? Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes, please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold, please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know: Thanks! USDA United States Forest National Forests in North Carolina 160A Zillicoa Street Department of Service Supervisor's Office P.O. Box 2750 Agriculture Asheville, NC 28802 828-257-4200 Cindy Karoly North Carolina Division of Water Quality 401/Wetlands Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27669- l 650 Dear Ms. Karoly; File Code: 7720-3-2 Date: April 17, 2006 - ?r Enclosed are seven (7) copies of a Pre-construction Notification (PCN) and a $200 application fee for the construction of a new trail bridge over the North Mills River, on the Pisgah Ranger District of the Pisgah National Forest, in Henderson County, North Carolina. The purpose of the project is to replace a trail bridge which was damaged by the remnants of Hurricanes Francis, Ivan, and Jeanne which impacted the area in September 2004. This project includes construction of new abutments, installation of a new prefabricated steel truss bridge, minor utility line relocation, rip-rap bank protection, minor trail reconstruction, and site restoration. Based on our review of the authorized Nationwide Permits (NWP) we believe this project is covered under NWP 3. As required by General Condition #3404 and PCN instructions, we are requesting Section 401 water quality certification for this project. Concurrent with this application, the PCN has been submitted to the US Army Corps of Engineers for Section 404 permit approval If you have any questions, concerns, and/or require additional information, please contact me or my representative, Paul Cole, at the following numbers; Lynn Hicks (828) 257-4243, e-mail - llhicks@fs.fed.us Paul Cole (828) 257-4232, e-mail - pcole@fs.fed.us Sincerely, L. HICKS Engineering, Minerals, and Telecommunications Staff Officer r, -, % T= LIU APR242006 OENR - OPtATcR GUAR BRANCH N@ ST0FWP' ydEilAJdDS b'" . REPULt !ED Office Use Only: Form Version March 05 G 0 00 a 8 9 USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. (If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".) 1. Processing Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: ® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules ? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ ® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification 2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 3 3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification is not required, check here: ? 4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII, and check here: ? 5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page 4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Niftop:gq t Areeao of Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check Q 1l?r?? k L II. Applicant Information APR 2 4 2OG6 DEhrt - ?rAI tk Gi r\G7 s Owner/Applicant Information t??p,,,aS?-cow?TE?bsc? Name Marisue Hilliard (Forest Supervisor) Mailing Address: US Forest Service National Forests in North Carolina P.O. Box 2750 Asheville NC 28802-2750 Telephone Number: 828-257-4200 Fax Number: 828-257-4263 E-mail Address: 2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.) Name: Lynn Hicks (Forest Engineer) Company Affiliation: Mailing Address: US Forest Service National Forests in North Carolina P.O. Box 2750 Asheville NC 28802-2750 Telephone Number: 828-257-4243 Fax Number: 828-257-4884 E-mail Address: lhicks@fs.fed.us Page 1 of 10 III. Project Information Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings, impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion, so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format; however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided. 1. Name of project: North Mills Trail Bridge Construction. 2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A 3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A 4. Location County: Henderson Nearest Town: Asheville, NC Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Exit #40, I-26, proceed southerly on SR280 for about 4 miles to the "North Mills River Recreation" sign, At this point turn right on route 1345 and proceed 5 miles to the bridge site at the recreation area parking lot. 5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.) . Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.4115 ON 82.6430 °W 6. Property size (acres): The Pisgah Ranger District is 234,576 Acres. 7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: French Broad River 8. River Basin: French Broad (Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.) 9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: Page 2 of 10 The project bridge spans the North Mills River at the North Mills Recreation Area. The previous bridge was severely damaged by debris in the flooding of September 2004. Debris carried in the flood waters dislodged one of the existing bridge piers. The recreation area sits in stands of hardwood and mixed conifer timber, with under brush of laurel and rhododendron. The soils are clayey silts, overlying cobble rock. This trail loop is used by thousands of visitors each year to view the unique flora in the area, (the pink flower). 10. Overall project description in detail including the type of equipment to be used: The new planned bridge will be a steel truss bridge with a span of 85 feet, with wood deck and steel railings. The structure will have cast-in-place, structural concrete abutments. There is access to both sides of the river via an road bridge. It is anticipated that the builder will set the bridge the bridge in two pieces, even though there is the access to both abutments for heavy equipment access. In order to protect the historical rock retaining wall (south bank) mid stream support will most likely be employed. Usually, the mid stream support consists of an oversized steel "sawhorse" type structure with adjustable legs (necessary for adjustment to stream bottom). This structure is set in the stream to support one half of the span until the second half can be placed. Excavation will be necessary on the north side of the river in order to key the machine-placed riprap for the north abutment. Riprap will also be placed for about 35 feet downstream from the north abutment to repair erosion that occurred in the September 2004 high water event. There will be no riprap placed on the south stream bank as the existing historical wall continued to be utilized for abutment protection. The two midstream piers that support the existing water/sewer piping will be removed. The new piping will be suspended on hangers under the deck of the new structure. Erosion and sedimentation control will be maintained throughout this project primarily through proper water management, construction sequencing, proper staging and stockpiling material, and the maintenance at all times, of suitable channel capacity for expected flow events. No equipment, fuels, lubricants, or other potential sources of water pollution will be stored in areas that could be flooded during this project. Work within the wetted perimeter of the stream will not be allowed from October 15`h -April 15`h' 11. Purpose of the proposed work: The North Mills River Trail Bridge connects the campground areas and day-use areas at this site. The trail is used by recreationists of all types, and during the winter months after the camping season passes, provides access by sportsmen. This bridge will be ADA accessible providing access to the entire recreation site. Placement of the designed riprap will prevent erosion of the abutments and the continued bank erosion. The new bridge will afford a larger stream cross sectional area in case of future high water and will sit approximately 4 feet higher than the old bridge. IV. Prior Project History Page 3 of 10 If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits, certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project, list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with construction schedules. N/A V. Future Project Plans Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application. N/A VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine; delineate and map all impacts to wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts, permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet. 1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: 1).North Abutment: Placement of Riprap. Riprap extends approximately 12 additional feet downstream at this abutment to repair bank erosion from 9/2004 storms. 2). Temporary mid-span support during bridge halves placement necessary for protection of the historic CCC wall. 3). Removal of damaged in-stream piers. Total disturbance area in acres: 0.013 2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding. N/A Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Floodplain Nearest Stream Impact (acres) (indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) (yes/no) (linear feet) None N/A N/A No 0 0 Page 4 of 10 Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0 3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560. Stream Impact Number (indicate on ma) Stream Name Type of Impact Perennial or Intermittent? Average Stream Width Before Impact Impact Length (linear feet) Area of Impact (acres) North Abutment N.Mills River Placing Riprap P 45 51 0.010 In-stream Support N.Mills River Temp. Support P 10 0.002 Pier removal (2ea) N.Mills River Removal of piers P 12 0.001 Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 73 0.013 4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc. Open Water Impact Site Number (indicate on ma) Name of Waterbody (if applicable) Type of Impact Type of Waterbody (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, ocean, etc.) Area of Impact (acres) 0 N/A None N/A 0 Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0 Page 5 of 10 5. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project: Stream Impact (acres): 0.013 Wetland Impact (acres): 0 Open Water Impact (acres): 0 Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.013 Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 73 6. Isolated Waters Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE. 7. Pond Creation: No pond creation for this project. 0 Acres If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application. Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond, local stormwater requirement, etc.): Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: Size of watershed draining to pond: VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization) Expected pond surface area: Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. See III, 10, above. VIII. Mitigation DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to Page 6 of 10 freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial streams. USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include, but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar functions and values, preferable in the same watershed. If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwettands/sti-mgide.htm]. 1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet) of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view, preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach a separate sheet if more space is needed. N/A 2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at (919) 715-0476 to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP website at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/wip/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information: Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A Page 7 of 10 IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ) 1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ? 2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA coordinator at (919) 733-5083 to review current thresholds for environmental documentation. Yes ® No ? NEPA Project Data Form is attached. 3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ® No E] X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ) It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the applicant's discretion. 1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233 (Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify V Yes ? No 2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer multipliers. Zone* Impact (square feet) Multiplier Required Mitigation 1 3 (2 for Catawba) 2 1.5 Total * Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1. Page 8 of 10 3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0244, or.0260. N/A XI. Storm water (required by DWQ) Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations demonstrating total proposed impervious level. N/A XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ) Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. Contract requires portable sanitation facilities for employees. XIII. Violations (required by DWQ) Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules? Yes ? No Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ) Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwet]ands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: XV. Other Circumstances (Optional): It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may Page 9 of 10 choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control). / / All, x, W 10, plicant/Agent's Signature Date (Ag " is signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.) Page 10 of 10 Attachments for North Mills River Trail Bridge Permit: • Vicinity Map • Location Map, Quad • NEPA Project Data Form, 2 pages 0 11" x 17" Bridge Layout Drawing, sheet 2/3 fh Mt r 1 /_j /V G frr ?:n e` 10 `.y.,.Cd?Mfn -..r ' SIIININC C / MCK Rod ew ?l'A? ?FSAInH,p Rcc4 Gep`3?? ??? Wll,lll?KNP;SS rr (ipc s nern Mi Umk ? ?_ J .__ i V@lrc9u\§MD APR 2 4 2006 DENR - WKI'LR QUALITY WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCI ilk l i PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM RANGER DISTRICT: Pisgah PROJECT NAME: North Mills River Campground Trail Bridge #14-0 STORM DATABASE PROJECT UID: 1749 Describe the condition of the site prior to the hurricane events. Pedestrian bridge on system trial in good condition Describe the storm damage to this site. Storm-related flooding damaged the bridge making it unsafe for public use. Betterment Justification: Repair damage from hurricanes in September 2004 Is the project in the Work Plan? X Yes No NA Has the IMT reviewed and approved the project? X Yes No NA What level of NEPA documentation was required? Maintenance CE (no additional documentation required -- FSH 1909.15, Chapter 30, Section 31.12, Category 4, Repair and maintenance of x roads, trails, and landline boundaries.) Decision Memo EA Date completed: 2/23/2006 Has IMT received Proposed Action Form? X Yes No NA Did the project require a BE? X* Yes No NA Does the project require a cultural survey? X** Yes No NA Have required surveys been completed? X Yes No NA Was a design package required? X Yes No NA If yes, has the package been approved? X Yes No NA Prepared By: Jeffrey M. Magniez, NEPA Writer * Bridge replacement is associated with a designated trout stream. The trout moratorium applies here - work will not be conducted during October 15 through April 15 (spawning period), on rainy days, or at elevated levels of flow. ** The proposed project activities have been cleared by the Heritage Resources specialist with the following mitigation: a qualified archaeologist or certified Heritage Resource Technician (HRT) must monitor the proposed activities at the time of implementation. The archaeologist or HRT must provide a report of the monitoring activity and its findings to the Forest Archaeologist or his 1 representative for inclusion in the project file. If cultural resources are discovered during the implementation, all activities must stop and the Forest Archaeologist or his representative needs to be contacted immediately. Any further data recovery and site mitigation will be initiated at the direction of the Forest Archaeologist or his representative. I have reviewed the information noted above and I recommend that this project be implemented. ,_ - RANbA- LL BURGESS Date Pisgah Ranger District District Ranger 2 UTR.ITIES NOTE: w-u E ava-9-?o-d aeanng BRIDGE LAYOUT The a "=' ls b wmaat. th..?arr a and swawe prwurty iocafM on Ve .M.Nng brmge. Her gaNadr.d tad cmdutt h b be IrutoII d an n =? Th- pkw waetrat. the Gowmmmt'. Bert e.Vnwt. of the eta corrd;U.m based en o Mh surrey, .Re ripYr and penral neuurmenth. Allmr adjuetm.nts , tle Her btdP•. wlrp an ap?prawd hmgen aaembh. Prrn'de / rd- and beam oe rpwr.d m tansieon Ul-Wee mto ear &Idge. Instal shut-oW and p p 6 n G 2 i? LRi y to fhs Mrinrrtal arrd wtical lanaut may be matls In tin fiNd and the Cmfroctor rllf -k *11h the CantraNng ONker (CO) at the eke to Rndl:e dpn-cut whr ouh?de of g embanFm.Ma and a minimum of 10 Mt N € P y 44 i c bcaUm. and .Nwttom of the abutments, approach trails, and ripmp. er cerr t- ..ctfons are to be p.-ur- tested and the from obufine . MMins d4mtecmI, prior t breaknq N. uHBng Amu. TM. nark fe nddental to Pay Gem 57101. - a S [ i EiyOng ilmber Stile (To R-r) Rate, to GENERk NOTES t DETAILS Meet far amdalt piaermnt and io p ? ' cvWn. at abutment mnaete bbckout o S $ ^ a ?? , y ' " Type I Barricade -Set Raba, aICp Ke4 o 3e 2. §ya BEGIN PROJECT L' STA. 0+00 Wj1'? ' J S 8 r ` k (,card, EeGfln9 Elwatlm 2217 CUR F Rl cm Gus E 1 o - i5 ti'D9 `?? ) 'ENO PRLUECT V STA. 1+99.11 &4b 9 Metric Rack Wall R . f0' c, '/? VT(F,? l JJ (go 4623'17 Not Disturb) J ')?- -y° l L - .74' / J'/ r / I I (MMeh Fefln9 D.wGon 2116.5f) e - ? f l L-9.10' 1 J I &MM ?\ T /A, f i ?rV71 R.mow1 9 T- a. 670.55 j? _- \ 4'•-1171 '.tl ? brlcabd Slut Re now-fAMM?'lrwx $c RNs -. - l ? n j I! T GENERIC 7NiE5 " Too Of EmbanWn.nt Slop. 0 2:f TRW Elewtlm 221603' 48' . 48' Standard Close r Nail And Tag Set In Tor fmbonknwnE 11 8 - 1 Sid. Of J Poplar O slope .. 2.. (?• gym). ti ( ?1• Line r 2x* Bow Structure *M H11 +11ti 1 t{ Q *as- K Rmaq EW9rq Trw 1,. 1,-? >E ,P I 7 i i (o Bee Rem e 11 l :? I Y CP13 `l r I 0+2564`. ! / --- s12100'oIw 277.89' _ -- - zz" R - 11'-6 s / - FRONT - - ?ro' we sr a sr SIDE Cp12 _ ° 1°e o (-0 Clot, Eater 1Y S. - '- I Pon. 2 NO Water Not.: p.atn : pcebn b¢idenfnl To Ma, wwI la ?.?at. To w Bridge, . To N.W eta Win TYPE I BARRICADE 9 v Is y Men r uruma Nrorz R.nr To Gnuna N '. ICI : -I 1 (r Y I' 5cole: Y' - 1'-0• r; ? % tam.. MrtmmrDistu - ?? 1 ? ?' \) xr ?t ) Wall - D. CONTROL COORDINATE LISTUNG Dnm'pem NORTHING EASTING EIEYATION Cap 5000.00 5000,00 2215.29 CP12 4615.74 4965.08 2211.04 CP13 5018.86 507039 2215.77 Q Abufmmt 1 4969.02 4978.08 - Q Abutment 2 4665.88 4980.41 - PROTECT DESIGN CRITERIA: TAW Bridge Shall Be ConetrucM In Accordance With The Following Club: P.deetrfan Uw Load - 85 PSF Vehlde Loading - [Not Required] Ground Snor Load - 20 PSF (With No Adadifl-U-n Fa-tar) Span Length - 85 -0' (E Bearing-To-f Bearing) Cleat Width - 51-4' (SU Typaal Section) Nigh Water Clearance - 2'-0' Min. (See EEVA770H Me She!) Running Plank. - No Bridge Ran Alex Opening - 12' ADA Handrail - No Riprap Rock A7morfng - CUSS 6 (FP-0.3) In-Stream Shoring - Nlo ed Deck Plank. - Pentachl-phmol Bridge Rub Ran/handnn Unh.e.d - [Rsdraad/Wsslem Red Cedar] Treated hthmAe/ .C Co Na - [Pmto°hl°roph C? AC0 I 1 /iy Oxlne Copper B_ St Lap ,hint BEGIM?RCJECT '- STA. 0+00 9 r ' - APR Z 4 ZGLE, .d i, I, F r ,., •,? ,- pa,d°9e - - I+? ° - luatcn FitMln9 EbvaBon Marva, Class 5 DENR-yWAlLn m t --- - - - ,-cuM (To Rem ) . WETIRNDS.AND STORMWKI BR rt? i ?tP% a1, .) II ,N . Type I Bcolmcla ??ER-?- 1a i / PLAN I C y nr,Mo r??• 6-+ 9 l :' J PARKING LOT ?2r U `7 ?I?' 1 w ' I / L..St-rnbea,?-' ?I'-6' (iyp.) F I \ N I ? ' p 65'-0' f B.arin9-7o-f Bearing 12 + O " q - \\ Strudlve Excavation H o Z^ Q 2 n 6 l?. ` ,\, `Rey Riprap Into Stvamlad cNW ? PIil :.. -u TYPICAL RIPRAP SECTION -y° Pnlabdcated Steel Truro S ((?b " Supertuduw, RMer V y Abutment No. 2 Only SCOIC Y' - I'-0• W g tl u To GElll]tN. NOTES i) - y W Van'or Ps PLAN 0 S a S Fm6ankmmf Tent ? w ? ? ? t O 2' Radiw w Embmkmmt w rRr.gd wn Cu- oIL 6= -212 _ 0 4 Canpadsd h 2220 +4.17% 0_9 - [Pay ttxn 30111 g Y _ IXPANSgN 10 Slope 2:1 (Max.) SL 2l 51 2I 2215 ?.XFIXED s - 0 Yr. Flood D- 2215.7' 2215 ° - Fa'gbxg_-CrountlGne - -- E+iMio9 Kst is Rod Wall nl _ -.. _ .?xub 4LrwndFm - Js ``?r (Do No Dwtrb) t 11 j ? 21 0 2210 - '- - -- _7y` - - -- -- - - - __.. - _-- -'' b -_ FQUNRIT9W-NOTE AwShast -- jF?a 2105 - 2705 \ Caret Abutment See Stuctum Excavation # Gn.M1„w &cawtlen - Mom 20806 ABUTMENT DETAILS Sheet ?- 20806 J ndWss Sfnatu Excava8on Md Backl111. N WaX u. &towtim `Edrllnq Crwmdllne 10906 RWrap, Cma 6 And Re.ha Of the Cholvrlthm ile UpMr.orn Md ?' ] #BQ CY Approach Tall Embankment #Slnafure Exc mmtbn - 0 CY #IZQ CY Mprooch Tral Embankment Fm mRMa+mwp Appma? FOUNDATION NOTE FmbaNmenb, Erematbri ? OhWUI psdEeeua?exemmflon ConeWel Footing 11-W e M Sub)'ed io Ch-g. EmDankmenm n Aaaordmce 50th BabucBm 204, Canpadlan (°,. TYPICAL APPROACH SECTION ppeppaerr?? q Qi F Minim YahtM. Eanante.d ELEVATION Quantities Sham Me Informational DNyu Th. Cantr°dar I. Respm.W. RdMonrg Shin FmLN Faofinge Art Waa. Shall 'eaalr.'fl''?e'' For Verification Of Of Q-ti Appaai. Suitable Ekc. 'd Mat-- El Scalr. Y' = 1'-0' e '67 TM FuM FooOng Bridge nknants Not Be mbd evatlare Have Been DMxMnrd n 7M FiW. F`156A NAVONA- F0t?F_5-r FFOJECT: 2 (°R`STSi?„1 u,S?b?A? ?Op?S?"55pUIC? G,?hAI? [J s ?PG2N 8 F156A1-I hANG?f, OISOICT NOUN ML5 F11M, XIIP6? (X'? NOI 14-000 N F_ L AYO UT NOF'TH MU5 plUFp & ARf Lo5p V& XIP6?5