20060669 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20060418

\o?0F w A rF9?G
Mr. Paul Williams
P.M. Development, LLC
P. O. Box 5657
Winston-Salem, NC 27113
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
MAY .9 2006
DENR - WATER QUALITY
VVETLA.NDS ANC) STo,!AWATFR 8R4NCH
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Williams:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
May 5, 2006
DWQ# 06-0669
Forsyth County
P.M. Development, LLC has our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to place permanent fill
in 140 linear feet of perennial stream in order to construct two road crossings for the Englebrook Residential
Subdivision located on Hauser Road, in Forsyth County near Lewisville, as described in your application
received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on April 18, 2006. After reviewing your application, we
have determined that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3402, which can be
viewed on our web site at http://www.ncwaterguality.org/wetlands.html. This Certification allows you to use
Nationwide Permit Number 39 when it is issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. In addition, you
should secure any other applicable federal, state or local permits before you proceed with your project,
including (but not limited to) those required by Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge, and Water
Supply Watershed regulations. Also, this approval will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires
unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is valid only for the purpose and design that you have described in your application. If you
change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be required to send us a new application for a
new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and
approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fill for this
project (now or in the future) exceeds one acre, or total fill to perennial streams equals or exceeds 150 linear
feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval
to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification, as well as the additional
conditions listed below:
1. The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all other specific and general conditions of this
Certification are met. No other impacts, including incidental impacts, are approved:
Amount Approved Plan Location or Reference
Streams 140 linear feet Panther Creek and an unnamed tributary located - 500 feet
northwest of Hauser Road in Forsyth County as depicted on the site
plan included with the application

None Caro ina
J?atu 2
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Certification Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 Phone [phone] FAX [phone]
2321 Crabtree Blvd. Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 Internet hftp://www.ncwaterguality.org
Customer Service Number: 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Mr. Paul Williams
Page 2, DWQ# 06-0669
May 5, 2006
2. Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures which equal or exceed those outlined in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual or the
North Carolina Surface Mining Manual (available from the Division of Land Resources at NCDENR
regional offices or the central office), whichever is more appropriate, shall be designed, installed and
maintained properly to assure compliance at all times with the North Carolina water quality standards
that are applicable to Class C waters as described in 15A NCAC 02B.0211 Fresh Surface Water Quality
Standards For Class C Waters. Such measures must equal or exceed the requirements specified in the
most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. These measures must
be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) sites, including contractor
owned and leased borrow pits, which are associated with this project.
3. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent
practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control measures in wetlands or waters is
unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that the
project is completed or, if applicable, within six months of the date that the project is released by the
North Carolina Division of Land Resources.
4. No waste, spoils, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the
footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction activities,
including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control "Best
Management Practices" shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards,
statutes, or rules occur.
5. The culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream profile
is not altered (i.e. the depth of the channel must not be reduced by a widening of the streambed).
Existing stream dimensions (including the pattern and profile) are to be maintained above and below the
location of each culvert. The culverts shall be designed and installed to prevent head cutting of the
stream. If a culvert becomes perched, the appropriate stream grade shall be re-established or, if a culvert
is installed in a perched manner, the culvert shall be removed and re-installed correctly. The Applicant
must submit a plan and receive written approval from this Office to address any head cutting that will
occur as a result of this project (e.g., use of cross vanes downstream of the culvert).
6. Where riprap is required for energy dissipation and scour protection, it shall be limited to the minimum
dimensions specified by appropriate engineering calculations. Riprap may only be used below the
normal high water level. The original grade and elevation of the stream's cross-section must be
maintained. Riprap placed in the stream bottom must be inserted into the bottom matrix to a depth
sufficient to provide the thickness of riprap required for scour protection. The elevation of the stream
bottom must not be increased by the placement of riprap. Placement of riprap must not result in
destabilization of the streambed or banks upstream or downstream of any crossing.
7. All construction activities associated with this project shall minimize built-upon surface area, direct
stormwater runoff away from surface waters, and incorporate best management practices to minimize
water quality impacts. If concrete is used with any fill material, it shall not be allowed to come in
contact with surface waters until it has cured. If any stormwater must be collected for discharge into a
stream channel, it shall not enter the stream as a point source, but shall be slowed and discharged as
sheet flow prior to entering the riparian buffer on either side of the stream.

P
J
Mr. Paul Williams
y Page 3, DWQ# 06-0669
May 5, 2006
8. Upon finishing the project, the Applicant shall fill out and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the §401 Certification has been completed.
This certificate should be returned to the Wetlands/401 Certification Unit of the NC Division of Water
Quality at the address listed on the form. Along with the Certificate of Completion, please send
photographs upstream and downstream of the culvert site to document correct installation.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You
must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition
which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final
and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
If you have any questions, please telephone Daryl Lamb in the DWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office at 336-
771-4959 or Ian McMillan in the Wetlands/401 Central Office in Raleigh at 919-715-4631.
Sincerely,,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AWK/cdl
Attachments
cc: Mr. John Thomas, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Central Files
Wetlands/401 File Copy
Mr. Mark Taylor, PE, EcoLogic Associates, P.C., 4321-A South Elm-Eugene Street, Greensboro, NC
27406
a. 1 F
Lo Log
=1 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission yl
Richard B. Hamilton, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Cyndi B. Karoly, Supervisor
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
NCDWQ Wetlands and StormNvater Branch
FROM: Ron Linville, Regional Coordinator ZWW
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: April 27, 2006
1§@TnVT=%
MAY 2 2006
?p?WAT?ea QUALIgTMgpNCH
SUBJECT: Review of an application by P. M. Development, Englebrook Development, Panther
Creek and an Unnamed Tributary, DWQ No. 2006 (not stamped), Forsyth County
The applicant is requesting 401 Water Quality Certification from the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality. The NCWRC has reviewed information provided by the applicant, and field biologists on our
staff arc familiar with habitat values of the project area. Thesc comments are provided in accordance with
provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (33 U.S.C. 466 et. seq.) and the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
The project is to install and/or replace two (2) pipe culverts in the Panther Creek drainage. A 110' x 66"
CMP is to increase impacts by 50 linear feet and a 63' x 42" CMP will increase impacts by an additional
38 linear feet. Total new impacts are indicated to be 140 linear feet of stream impacts.
Based on our in-office review, we will not object to the road improvement project. Our general
recommendations for culvert installations are:
I. Bridges are recommended for all permanent roadway crossings of streams, floodplains and
associated wetlands to eliminate the need to fill and culvert active floodplains. Bridges
should be the standard practice where significant natural resources like trout, listed species, or
site limitations like bedrock exist. Floodplain capacities and floodplain functions must be
maintained with bridges and culverts.
2. If culverts must be used instead of bridges, culvert length must be minimized to the
maximum extent practicable. Culverts should be designed and installed to allow passage of
aquatic organisms. Culverts 48" or larger must be buried at least a foot (12") below the
streambed. Culverts less than 48 inches diameter must be buried to a depth equal to or
greater than twenty (20) percent their size to provide aquatic life passage. These
measurements must be based on natural thalweg depths. Culverts should be situated so that
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

P. M. Development -Page 2 -
April 27, 2006
no channel realignment or widening occurs. Widening of the stream channel at the inlet or
outlet of structures usually causes a decrease in water depth and velocity resulting in
increased sedimentation and diminished aquatic life passage.
3. Natural stream channel dimensions must be maintained or provided/restored. Flat concrete
aprons between wing-walls must not be used. Riprap must not be placed in the streambed.
Riprap must not interfere with passage of existing aquatic life.
4. If multiple barrels are needed, the second and any additional barrels should be placed so that
their bottoms are located on the active bank full elevation. These bank full barrels must be
connected to active floodplain benches to provide natural dimensions for the base flow
channel with sufficient water depth during low or normal flows to accommodate movement
of aquatic species.
5. If culverts are excessively long and/or sufficient slopes exist, alternating baffles should be
provided in a manner that conforms to channel bends upstream and downstream, mimics
natural meanders, prevents upstream scour and downstream deposition, moves typical bed
load materials, and provides resting areas and passage for aquatic species.
6. Work must be accomplished so that wet concrete does not contact stream water.
7. If previous impacts have occurred that should have been permitted and certified pursuant to
Clean Water Act, appropriate mitigation should be provided.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this prQjcct. If you have any questions
regarding these comments, please contact me at 336/769-9453.
Ec: Daryl Lamb, DWQ-WSRO
Triage Check List
Date: 4/24/06
Project Name: Englebrook SD
DWQ#: 06-0669
County: Forsyth
Daryl Lamb, Winston-Salem Regional Office
To:
60-day processing time: 4/18/06 - 6/16/06
From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone: [phone]
The file attached is being forwarded to you for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
1-1
Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will creed to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks !
ECOLOGIC
Engineering/Construction
April 18, 2006
Cyndi Karoly, 401 Unit Supervisor
401 /Wetlands Unit
NCDENR Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
4321-A S. Elm-Eugene St. - Greensboro, NC 27406
[phone] - Fax [phone]
www.ecologic-nc.com
RE: NWP 39 Application - Englebrook Development, Forsyth County, NC
Owner: P.M. Development, LLC
Dear Cyndi:
Please find attached a check for $200.00 along with five (5) copies of a pre-construction
notification (PCN) for Nationwide Permit 39 for the above referenced project. An agent
authorization letter, a memo on avoidance and minimization efforts, drawings of the proposed
development, and a vicinity map on USGS topo are enclosed with the PCN.
The original PCN and enclosures have been mailed directly to John Thomas, PE of the USACE,
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office. If you have questions or need further information, please call
our office at [phone].
Sincerely,
EcoLogic Associates, P.C.
D R@?4
a:J
APR 1. 8 2006
Mark A. Taylor, PE ? EXAtbiMOWATER
U rv
Project Consultant BRANCH
C: Paul Williams, P.M. Development, LLC
Harris Gupton, PE, Gupton & Associates, P.A.
John Thomas, PE USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Technology Serving Ecology
?K• Printed on recycled paper.
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
kit any parncutar item is not apphcaole to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
IT. Applicant Information S??LI V f D
Q
1. Owner/Applicant Information APR 1 8 2006
Name: P.M. Development LLC Contact: Paul WilU1.1 44
C.Nrx - S
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 5657 w?? STp RBH
Winston-Salem, NC 27113
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: 1)[e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Mark Taylor, PE
Company Affiliation: EcoLogic Associates, P.C.
Mailing Address: 4321-A S. Elm-Eugene St.
Greensboro, NC 27406
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 13
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Englebrook Residential Development
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 5865-86-1602 and 5865-77-9785
4. Location
County: Forsyth Nearest Town: Winston-Salem
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Englebrook
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Take US 421 north
from Winston-Salem to the first Lewisville exit 0244). Go right on Williams Rd. 0.2 mile
and turn left onto Shallowford Rd. Go 1.3 miles and turn left onto Hauser Rd. The site is 1.0
mile on the right (0.6 mile after passing under US 421).
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 36.095833 ON 80.463611 °W
6. Property size (acres): 72.135
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Panther Creek
8. River Basin: Yadkin-Pee Dee
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is partially wooded with some old fallow fields that
are presently grown over with grasses and small vegetation. The surrounding land is mostly
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 13
large rural farm and home sites. Some homes are newly developed while others have been
established for many years.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: A typical
residential subdivision requiring rough site grading and infrastructure The only proposed
impacts to Waters of the U.S. are replacements/extensions of two pipe culverts for roadway
crossings of Panther Creek and its unnamed tributary. Panther Creek is a perennial creek and
a Class C water.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The proposed culvert replacements/extensions
in Panther Creek and its unnamed tributary will provide road access to the western portion of
the property, which is topographically isolated by the creek valley. Refer to the attached plan
views (1 "=100' and 1 "x200').
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. Does not apply.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 13
Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: One 66" CMP culvert 110 feet lonli
(50' increase) and one 42" RCP culvert 63 feet long (38' increase Rip-rap channel lining at
dischargre ends for scour protection having, a combined length of 52 feet The proposed
impacts are to Panther Creek, a perennial stream. Refer to the attached plan views (1"=100'
and 1 "200' ).
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
( es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.0
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.1
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
1 Panther Creek Culvert P 10-15 50 0.017
2 Panther Creek Riprap P 10-15 30 0.010
3 UT Panther Ck Culvert P 10-15 38 0.013
4 UT Panther Ck Riprap P 10-15 22 0.008

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 140* 0.048
* Impacts are increases in length when existing culverts are replaced.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 13
Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma) Name Waterbody

(if ap
applicable) )
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0.0
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.048
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.048
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 140
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 13
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
See attached letter from project designer Gupton & Associates P.A.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
htti)://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strm??ide.htm1.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
None proposed. Proposed impacts are believed to result in minimal adverse effects to the
aquatic environment.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 10 of 13
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(square feet) Mitigation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page I I of 13
2 1.5
Total
Lone i extends out SU teet perpendicular from the top of the near bank ol'channel, "Lone 2 extends an
additional 20 reet from the edge or Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Enhancement, or Payment into the
appropriate information as identified
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Existing % impervious z 0%
Proposed % impervious = 19.9% (14.34 impervious acres of 72.14 total site acres)
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Since there is no public sanitary sewer service available to this site sanitary sewer needs will be
provided by installing septic tank systems approved by the Forsyth County Health Department
These septic systems will be privately owned and maintained by the individual lot owners
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 12 of 13
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
coLo4(a AsSodaWT, P C .
Applicant/Agent's Signature L/ 'Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 13 of 13
Am PM
¦¦ DEVELOPMENT
April 12, 2006
John Thomas
USACE - Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
RE: EcoLogic Associates, P.C.
Authorized Agent for Jurisdictional Waters Determinations and Permitting
Englebrook - Hauser Road, Lewisville, N.C.
Dear Mr. Thomas:
This letter confirms that EcoLogic Associates, P.C. of Greensboro, NC is hereby
authorized as an Agent to represent P.M. Development, L.L.C. during site visits to
determine, confirm, delineate or otherwise assess the jurisdictional status and extent of
streams, wetlands and other waters within the boundary of the above referenced project
Lewisville, NC. They are also authorized to have signatory authority on any notifications
or permit applications that may be required to obtain the necessary authorizations or
permits to implement the project under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
This authorization will continue until revoked by the undersigned in writing. Thank you
for your cooperation, and please notify us if additional action is required.
Sincerely,
PM Devel ment
Paul Williams
501 SHEPHERD STREET, WINSTON-SALEM, NC 27103
336.659.9503
Guptoll
Engineering-Planning-Surveying
2200 Silas Creek Pkwy., Suite 2B
Winston-Salem, N.C. 27103
Memorandum
To: Mark A. Taylor, P.E.
From: Harris B. Gupton, P.E.
Date: 4/17/06
Re: Stream Crossing in Englebrook Development, Forsyth County, N.C.
The Englebrook Development consists of 31 single family home sites on a 72 acre tract
located in western Forsyth County. There is an exiting farm shop site on the property located
approximately 760 feet from Hauser Road. The site is partially wooded with some old
cultivated fields that are presently grown over with grasses and small vegetation. The
surrounding land is mostly large rural home sites, some are newly developed and others have
been established for many years. Some of the older home sites also include some farm uses
and pastures. The access drive to the existing farm shop site crosses a stream approximately
378 feet from Hauser Road and an existing farm road that was used to access the field areas
also crosses a tributary of the same stream within 200 feet of the first creek crossing. Most of
the site, approximately 95 percent, can only be accessed by crossing this creek.
In order to gain access to the majority of the property, we designed our roadway to use both of
the existing piped crossings and aligned these crossings as close to perpendicular to the stream
as possible. Impacts to the streams have been minimized by utilizing these existing stream
crossing locations and replacing the existing pipes, adding length only as necessary to
accommodate required roadway sections.
We herewith request that you file the required notifications and/or permit applications with
NCDENR and USACE for the subject stream crossing.
Phone [phone] Fax [phone] E-mail guntonna(i„)guntoncomr)anies.corn
Q a
nn ?--s
O =-
C14 C C
??yy C
nns
°
0
m
z(D
V
z
w • 0? sv owroz
s1m VE" )MV xvi
'Qd 9DtS 9'0
A ? L?0 SION
AW419

® d1

e ? O i b W

Q LL
B CL

s? W U
W ? Z
2h
axe
la
W _J N w 1,
Oil
u!
? N
loci '??
811/\V \8A\,s?
UaM
a
M1.9 0
ovz?
?N3G
k, o

0
E

' 10
91 Rt

* 0
C
E.v°
E
8
e

`. E
E
0
V
N
M
O
19
O it O
cr j .;I -V
z
as

0
O
(" - .0r)
lanoD ae3'1

O
3
fig
d
r's
Y
3
11--
?W. 19a
i
Y
s
p
fill
\P#91

e ?
III SolIstIptialeF8
•001 04660#0010
?.x''
It •. \ rl/;._?ii (ll?•,1, / ???'Ir.( i_?? ?? I\__-'?////r/? .??- \( I/ I'\ ;'" /J /?K
N. A I I'?/ -. , J'I r'('^?/1•, ?\?I?.`I `? a ? ,??r' '? >w C-???, ?(,? ??? I\[l ?• --?•?-rt
,? i. .:M1i? I I '.I/ ?\ \yj? / /1I'I/-\.,' ,' _ ?Y I i',i ,p. ` // ?'• t i r'% ?1?0 `i \ C t, i , ?, ?'\? .. \\ A
.l ii .',I?I rl H1 d?? '?.. ?:? )? r. r //i•?/.,1. !??? I i y ?' /?., .r-'?(/ '1 ? ? .? ??) /.? t?: - j,
4 , ar I? I. /,, ,?„ /1 , ? 111 i,; •,, I ?(??. ,?, ,,. ?% ,?, ?? ` .??/-/? ?t?•[-? `'=?- 8?>'/J ?_
1c?-f, °.? Ilf ,) ???j ?. /?I ( ) _ I 1 v II ?' : ?? 1 ??.? v, _? • ;? ? r/•.r?,?,-? _ /
I
ltv Il. ??; III-._?,•. ' 11 j''r''I?? \? +{<•'? ?I VI I t
?? II? ? i I I,( i :? ti.? ., .V(?_ •? \.?)Ir ?.I / Ir.:??i?.t- I 't•'., ?'?a'•??? ?
,i? f l,? 1 ??yD ?Yr, ?,v,•;/ i I / 'C?-`' ?> its `I t I~ • //r/ f r? '/ \ ':.f7 \'\:\ /?
o_! ??a... ?.j\ ? I L..? ?'ll?'%? ' ,1!• />' r li`",? 4 1 JI e/.1' /r• `\ `- ?
1t'. \ ? l . v 4 111 g , P,.; ? ?`.? I/ .; r. • tl
/?? ? ' ? .? '.?1 • U, ' ?? /// I - ? 11 • L y
C1 . 'q :/\ ?? ,'d1. 1 I ?. \ ( % - Q+I, tl ) (, i/ - ,./• r ,( / r )y I ? ?a'l?1 _? I')? ?I \ t " % I`th J„, f ?C;'? \ r !4?'`i`./"/ b ^Il -!/l;J'I?????'-' ?f ./? /"_ t?o\ l'`\?jl/,It'. Y (?r'?Ith'?
.: i ?? /) •1 Ll, I \ /?. ' ?N??'"'t I) ?? ? -3i -- i' I,? ?? I .?Ij'M? ?.?%?,'!/!?l'Igl l( /f ?/' p/J!'I 'I?
yG
' ( V.j? \1?? ?u'I '/ _ -'? - ? ?. 1J' ?/4-; _J ?'? ??r c>; (rl - tom.. •- It,,.ll _. f ?J 1d ?/ _
00
/ r r t _ Ti"\ ?? v 11 1 (1 K\o , I • r , ' ?, i rr I L-
( 1 I /?/ 1 / ? C? Yl,• ?!• ? ,.. i I ? ? l ? ? J •N? \. / ?; ??`, V ,? "?/ ? /I •. ?, y /r b ?_?i,?'} +.• c.
\ ? •i. /-?? (,\ r ?', t %/ Il .- ii . ?;! ?'/' a..l SW.fC/ f• I ?I -. a
'J? ? \ ((t' t \? tl ? )(?- i??, , // i r u?r• / ""_?If.,? r" -HBO ?Y/'_. A ?? 7
/
Y?r \'\ f J,. i`,'t ../?i.,4'/•?
ty ?k•,.,,? i... ?/ /?/Ji I/I),
17
ael) ,? t i // 1 III ;/ ?? \ ayor/ i.-
/, , 11 ? I i /'' t rl w li J I I' ? ,/ it \,J • - /?, j., r •i /11/ \ J ?. r , ; I ' ( / A ??
l.. "?; 11
11`(\ ) ' /'.i'( I ;/.'"-.r `' / ?,p r'f _ . ?9' !' ?,` / I i`.•! I?? ?? y%? /.?,5.
r' I ? ?\'!i'1 ,0 // ;r ''' I I' I // I, ryV / QO ,% ,, 1.?, /i (•..? i -? i ?? ?,
'Aj
?\ `'?\ ; \111 ,/ .l I //?( , , _ ,db, /i/ _? tl ,II(,• ??. ? 7r\ ; ?(I /
• ? O , 1 I I / 1 o+`?JII - I li __` /` \. ;1 t r \ ! !>i N ! - r . / - i?'J
It, Q_
/?? 11? . /• I?// ?t\ ii111 it r/ _ Jl// ?? / ?? \ ? ? '_ r???)i ? ?' ' _ s?.?'\ < r: ?' o).1J p`'I!(1\t• - \ ( - J ??;..
lII?I •?
1? la"J/v / / •\ (, ? ` I -, ? 1 .% ?r/, V'tl Ir /_ r ?d?'..?-?.o- /,`Ill 1^ • \,?
!f .._, \t '\ / o}/j : I( I d' i I\./• lam) F•?a :' I.• / ,r
\?? `J• %/ lrS\\? ? ? '-.?/ ? `.; J l?` ?.? ( / I U il'^?,? ? :I ??/ ?f/!,f/ ? \i•?..•a < / jO ??i ? 'II,? I?,1 ?l ••I? \? ?'?=?. i?
\ ('? 1, I'/ ,?\Jr \\ A 'S. `1 \ .t t f--..L ?•' ? / ?'•yCS r ' ??',' _'?/ '\??. f,/ ?'}'1 N v//?!l i ? ?//jJ'I ? r ,??.-,' ;
?I, 11;1'`. ?. ?,? ?\;r ? 1')t `•`?I )yy?..' 'Il • ('?' f I'?\\,/ r1 ??'y?,r i??/I /'+II Iry',r1Y, `• •k ,?
?l 1,,,,. 1 ? ,- / ,I % II \' }, ,. l`;?\ +, ,. , ? 1 I' .. ?• sl , ??'? 11,> • l l jr,?.T( II '( (I. ?
cYtdA
.o>-- l '1?. II ?1, \ t 1t0 <-. )\r 1 ?'` I ?( / /? r ?•, ?'; u? 11{ t?? - n
;. 1? ti \" l f ?J ?I ( !fir 1 - , \ '? J - I fll O _ - li ?.-.1• i? [ ?`'? i (,.a. ,?/ I
111 ji II / I 1 ?/f: ? '- . I l/' /?? ; ` :,,??J? ` ? / '_.?'% l?-? ? `? • ,',`t11v?\\II
k A?
);I'
.la `' it I//i`?? ?,?'?y i'i l - It , /. -.`??,/rj,
h
.iyt, ?`?? ,.. ?J I n ` 1 I I ?• r '?.J .,?' IM „F/J 1 t ^ 1\ / _ i\, "
1, We
•; --1 1:` I /C /'I' I I?r.. I / , ' y'.':•X ?Iy--G 7 II /?, 1 C
??4' ? ,jyt -? "` ??? -? n1 ? r!1 l7/?/, / 1. '. II I` ? '? ? if : •? V?j.'I
r?,,, , ,' --/ ? ?. .••+ •:?f•'"• ;830' 'v../."/ i (r
J-'v r' T/ I ;,1 1 ?`;`;\ ^.?•: ` J 4'"rlt`- v / y i W f I/t (r•? I? !r %? j.
ts3 \ If Vl_ •y 11 \ 1' - i ; ,tl• / i - ?--?'C .- •r '` i c~y I I c{? ;/A,fl?',.
?/ ;'•
:f ;? "', ! t ? i` 166 •? ` 1 '%?,??''?C''
` - v ? ?'- % I ? _ _ ' ?. ?\`•` -- ' ? ,?;' fi/s; ? ?, ?A .?t/ •?y'? •
1 /r, ? (?/ I ,:? \I \\?ir? f • ?it?Tr1 `= ?\ 'I'S ?I t / ? (, ?I //l1 ,/ •
n P•??`\, ,\ ,?, \`. ^ ( ( r I r? ? 11 ,?\ `? tl(,ll ?1\I rr \ / I ? / /
9,W reek
J, (? ?Ll/111 \\?1 ,?' y •F? 1112
Name: CLEMMONS D Location: 036° 05'26.9' N 080° 27'21.9' W
Date: 4/13/2006 2006 Caption: Viicinity Map - Englebrook Subdivision - PM Development
Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet APR 1 8
17Y
.,M ,mnc AWI1 S7 7• Meplech• Inc.

X ~I
834.4 PROPERTY LINE DATA HIC SCALE ~I~ GRAP LINE DIRECTION DISTANCE
GS S ~ X ~ L1 Nl36'17'58"W 38.76' too o so too zoo ~ aoo
ti y9<( 84.1 837.3 R o~G L2 N86'17'S8"W 3.68' I L3 S6T53'13~ 36.66
A~~ Oq~FOR 0 L4 S6T53'13'1N 65.21'
SITE ~0 868.4 a L5 N4T09'33"E 61.11' 6.8 L6 N04'00'00"E 7.15' (IN FEET )
3 866.8 ~v~'pP~ c L7 N75'S0'11 E 23.00' 1 inch = 100 ft.
~ ~ ~ c
~ 8 ~ ,
E' w )g, Ro. ? 0 0
X ~ ` X PROPERTY CURVE DATA
84 w ~ N o CURVE RADIUS LENGTH CHORD BEARING C1 230.00' 146.48 144.01 N3Tll'29"W
~ ~ 8? ~ a w 0 az ~ C2 230.00' 95.16' 94.48' N6T17'19"W
> 0 t. C3 270.00 47.04' 46.98 N74'09b1"W ii C4 270.00' 111.83' 111.04' N5T1T36"W
z o W E °ta S CS 270.00' 59.79' 59.66' N39'05'02"W I
w ~ C6 230.00 207.85' 200.85' N58'37'47"W I C7 55.00' 57.60' 55.00' S26'00'00"E
5~ ~4 ~ 8 856.8 880 C8 45.00' 47.12 45.00' S26'00'00'E 8$ 60 v C9 45.00' 37.59' 36.51 S2T55'S8"W
P - NO SCALE ",,6 43.8 VICINITY MA C10 45.00' 58.75' 54.67' 589'16'05"W
1 5 8, s, C11 45.00 45.03 43.17' N24'39'S3"W C12 270.00' 93.99' 93.52' N13'58'22"E
C13 270.00 98.61 98.06 N34'2430 E
)p4 ~ C14 270.00' 123.64' 122.56' N57'59'21 "E
tat ~ 1 8~0 C15 270.00' 22.28' 22.28' N73'28'19"E 852 C 16 205.00' 90.15' 89.43' N63' 14' 17"E
8 ~ 7oa ~ cP J s B .3 r 860 C17 170.00' 26.31' 26.29' N55'04'26"E ,il C18 170.00' 30.85' 30.81' N64'42'25"E
~ ~~O ss. z O z~ C19 170.00' 59.94' 59.63' N80'00'26"E
0 " ~ 8 0. 851.2 C20 45.00' 34.37' 33.54' N68'13'39"E 1 C21 45.00' 20.79' 20.61' N59'35'03"E
" a . C22 45.00' 42.31' 40.77' S80'14'25"E
J h ~ , ~6, C23 45.00' 44.89' 43.05' S24'43'33"E 8, IE~ C24 45.00' 54.64' 51.35' 538'38'10"W
sk 8S0 850 ?q ; C25 45.00' 47.48' 45.30' N76'21'15"W •49 C26 45A0' 34.37' 33.54' N68'00'39"W
,r, j s• C27 130.00' 89.55' 87.79' 570'22'27"W
C28 245.00' 30.06' 30.04' S54'09'i6"W ~ C29 245.00' 77.68' 77.36' 566'45'09"W
OW R ~ , 85 . C30 230.00' 104.69' 103.79' 562'47'48"W ~ 851.2 C31 230.00' 183.68' 178.84' 526'52'43"W
t~: R ~ a C32 270.00' 244.00' 235,78' S58'37'47"E
~ h . 4 5 A D C33 230.00' SD.93' 50.82' S39'05'02"E
LO 443 ,LOT 3A C34 230.00' 135.34' 133.39' S6~ 1 T03"E C35 270.00' 150.25' 148.32' S63'11'58"E
RS 40 AG ° 00 ' NG 0 „ , a e' ~v 3 .zs C36 270.00' 133.41' 132.06' S33'06'OS"E a .zs
A P M
~J 0 h N
J
~ ~ yy p 866,8
O ~
1~ ~ ya ~ a l COUNTY PANNING BOARD
F' 0 ~ ' ~ N SITE PLAN LEGEND
• w N
x~ ~s. r 3 z' ZONING z'
~ 'i. I 8 - ,5 Existing Zoning AG
a 2S i 'S ~6~ Type Review Requested: Ac-PRD N R F E 10' 40' R/w to'
47.6 ~S I M T R ~ EASEMENT UTILfiY PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION E E EASEMENT APPROVAL
2 0~, A v, i il, s~, ~„2 9 i,%i t. D B. 1 ~ 1 6 6 25' 27' B-B VALLEY CURB 6.25' (Le. Rezoning, Planning Board Review,
i~ B 0 3 0 , 1, Preliminary Subdivision Approval, etc,)
~ BEM 9 i ~ 0 S 0 SITE DATA
~S, ~ Q US11- ,s~ 7 12" Beinq Tax Block 4435 Lots 2D,4M,8P
a Total Acreage 72.135 ACRES
~ ~~'i 1/2"~~ 2" I-2 1~a°~pT. 1/2"/~ Total Lots 31 ~ ~ Density 0.42 Lats/ Acre
60 ~ N s.03 I N' e' A.B.C. Total Length Streets 3,728' Private
J~O. , ~ 4 0 I ~ 5 3" MIN UNDER CURB
p *n 1 ° INFRASTRUCTURE n r
cmm rea i' % o ~ ~o ~ a ~1 ~ a~ 1 ,1 G-. r PRIVATE LO'~AL RESIDENTIAL ROAD water x .Public Private ,
6 ~ 9" 7" N.T.S. Sewer Public x Private 6' ' , Streets Public x Private
infie 837.6 X e tic Ids ~
l ~ w . o A ~ 9. c1" - ~ Clil' OF W.S. ~i~..,uvcREit
~,i, VALLEY CURB I 30' AREA SUMMARY RD
I ~ 83 .5 ne~oo'oaw ~ `':1 ~ )
a X i i, ~ 273.03' ` _ LOTS 39.116 ACRES 54.23% COMMON AREA 29.435 ACRES 40.80%
N SUBDMSION STREET 'PRIVATE' 3.584 ACRES 4.97%
i~ + 1 TOTAL AREA 72.135 ACRES 100.00%
' g"E DUKE ER CO. ~
° 50' RIGHT- -Wqy i, ~ 49.9 w TOTAL DISTURBED AREA: 14.62 ACRES 0 7
~ SE 0.8. 167 r+es•oa'oa'w I 3 P9• 5 a
z73.oo' TO E
I~ Ij 0' UTILI EAS MENT , }
W R RL X SHOP X20 X REMaN , WATERSHED CALCULATION$if applicable) - Excludes,Salem Lake
Y ST ~ 30 C 1 T ~ n d TOTAL SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE 3,142,200 Sq. Ft TOTAL MAXIMUM COVERAGE 757,603 Sq. t
a rf L E ES 5 I'. ~ ~ LESS: EXISTING BUILT UPON AREA: 4,573 Sq. Ft (EXISTING BUILT UPON AREA PLUS NEW
1 6 6 I ~ ill a . . 0 . L ~ ~ ~ ~ C VACANT LAND AREA: 3,137,627 Sq. Ft MAXIMUM BUILT UPON AREA) d MAXIMUM NEW BUILT UPON AREA 753,030 Sq. Ft
T , ~ \ ~ ~ o R 0 A ; p i a~~ ' WS IV BALANCE OF WATERSHED PROP05ED BUILT UPON AREA: 624,840 Sq. Ft r
N 00'W I E I~ 58o'00'OD"E ~ I~ 273. a 59.1 ~9s 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ „ ~ B oo' c^ 1 ~ ~ r - 36% IF NO CURB AND GUTTER ~ 1 ~ - 24Z WITH CURB AND GUTTER
' a t F i i 'P .3 'Lj, , u,
x , ~ ~'p ~ y~ J / e~ - 24% RESERVOIR PROTECTION AREA ~o
~g k ~I 3 o g h ~ CO ed i 1 ~ 5 ~
~ ~ ~ g ~~5 ~ i 0 1_ ~ , ~ I~ H p T ^x ~
o I ~ '°~i O Ir 69' z'o i
I Y
r $ ~ I ~ 566 , 00 ~ ' ~ ~ '00'0 ' _ 15 .o ' .J ~ o~ lj j; I
7 .0 ' .00' 8 0 ~ i ~'l! D ~ , _ I,, i ~ _
I i ~ I ~ M
i ~ epl~ !E is " C P E is " C P ~ 'ti^ ~ ~ ~ p h
I ~ 2~ ao ~ ~ z' V h ro ~ N
a o ~ `~0 i c OEA,F ~vATt:k ce Exist e t'Tt`TtAN03a+~t, c7ru?uv~n t ~
0 3 m n ea ` ~ a with ~ 4~
i HARRIS B. GUPTON CERTIFY THAT
~ d sa6' 'ao~ ~ ti ain fields a 7 . THIS MAP WAS DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN _ ` ACTUAL FlELD SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISIGN ON
2 ~ I 68. ~ ' > ~ , AUGUST 31, 2005
~ i
f ~ ~ p ~ o i m NOTES:
to ° W ~ ~ X ALL LOTS SHALL BE 150 FEET AT THE BUILDING UNE
Y ~ ~ I N W TOPO TAKEN FROM CITY/GOUFIIY TOPO MAPS
LEGEND r e1~3
- PROPERTY LINE o W a
BUILDING FOOTPRINT ~ N 6' S .7 RIGHT OF WAY LINE e~
LINE FROM DEED OR PLAT 700 r se 'oo• DC8 % ~ t~`
N/F NOW OR FORMERLY ~ ~ ~ 30 ~ 0 e0 'h~ ~ t
U EIP EXISTING IRON PIN , SCALE:
0 NIP NEW IRON PW O
0 NPS NO POINT SET a ' ,15~ li 1~ 1 - 100
® R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY MONUMENT w , ii ~ o ~ ~ ~
PP POWER POLE N ° I m 4 HYD HYDRANT ~2 ~ o a 0~ ~ ~o ~ DEVELOPER ~ ~ REVISIONS: SHEET NC.
0 ~ 13,5 ~ TB TRAFFIC SIGN BOX a ~ r 0 ~ i 0ti 12,2 PM DEVELOPMENT, LLC /os
o ~ X 0 ABLE TV PED. TV C z/17 os P.O. BOX 5323 0
00 D TELE TELEPHONE PEA ~ ~ I o / 7 w 2/27/os EROS WINSTON-SALEM, N.C. 27113 336-784-7991
~ LP LIGHT POLE i ~ 42.45'
~ WM WATER METER ~j / t°t°I GUPTON 8c ASSOCIATES P.A.
0 CO SEWER CLEAN-OUT 164.11 l e 6' l/ 4 2 \J 4 66 32/9S 840
YI YARD INLET N a' ota N 6' '1 " 44'1 " NOW F M s a NOW © ~ 3 . DA D CAL I 4 840 3j~ c ENGINEERS-PLANNERS-SURVEYORS "
CB CATCH BASIN R E N C E EDW P I I E 2200 SILAS CREEK PKWY. - SUITE 2B N4T 933 a, WINSTON-SALEM, N.C. 27103 336-723-2459 6 .11'
URNE N. and e A (TiE F 1~ ` DRAWN BY: SPH SURVEYED BY: PROJECT NO.
PG 13 6 D. P A L C 4 0 1 40 AG T BLOCK L I G f N46'47 33"E'-" I G R 4 A 38. 2 ? DESIGNED BY: BSH DATE:
TAX LOCK 4435, LOT 18 ZO I G S 4 , AG AUGUST 31, 2005 122 05D APPROVED BY: