20060666 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20060417

OF wArFRP
?O G
q
r
CO
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 3, 2006
DWQ Project # 06-0666 Version 2
Henderson County
Chris Frame
Campus Quarters, LLC
Post Office Box 2283
Savannah, GA 31402
Subject Property: Campus Quarters
Henderson County
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Frame:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed
below, to place fill within or otherwise impact 0.25 acres of wetlands and 60 linear feet
of perennial streams for the purpose of road development at the subject property, as
described within your application received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
on April 17, 2006. After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts
are covered by General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3402 (GC3402). The
Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 39 when issued by the US Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE). In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with
any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project
including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, Non-discharge, stormwater
and buffer regulations. Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts
or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose that you described in your application. If you change
your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application.
If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and
approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total fills
for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of
stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506
(h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: httr)://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Wore
?Vaturallil
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Campus QuartersVer2
Page 2 of 7
July 3, 2006
1. Impacts. Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific
and general conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met.
No other impacts are approved including incidental impacts:
Amount
Approved (Units) Plan Location or Reference
Wetland 0.23 (acres)
Wetland 0.02 acres
Stream 60 (feet) UT to Bat Fork Creek
2. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all
specifications governing the proper design, installation and operation and
maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to protect surface
waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be
designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning
and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and
erosion control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the
requirements specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on
all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including
contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be
designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most
recent version of the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the
reclamation in accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation
Pollution Control Act.
3. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian
areas beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction
Notification. All construction activities, including the design, installation, operation,
and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices,
shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes,
or rules occur.
Campus QuartersVer2
Page 3 of 7
July 3, 2006
4. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters
to the maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control
devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the
natural grade restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land
Resources has released the project.
5. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification
or applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is
required to return the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit,
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC,
27699-1650.
6. Diffuse Flow (No Review)
All constructed stormwater conveyance outlets shall be directed and maintained as
diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through the protected stream buffers such that
it will not re-concentrate before discharging into a stream.
7. Mitigation
The Division of Water Quality has determined that protecting all remaining streams
and wetlands on the property, with 25 foot buffers measured from the top of bank on
both sides of the streams and wetlands, and the removal of all remaining, unutilized
culverts with stream restoration throughout the property shall offset the impact
associated with this activity. Deed Restrictions or Conservation Easements shall be
placed on the protected waters and a copy of the signed easements or recorded
restrictions must be submitted to this office within 30 days of issuance of this
Certification.
8. Buffer Re-establishemnt
A 25 foot woody buffer, from the top of each bank, shall be established on all
jurisdictional waters throughout the subject +/-27.18 acres, where none currently
exist, to preserve water quality. All buffer re-establishment shall be in accordance
with the Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration. (See attached)
Campus QuartersVer2
Page4 of 7
July 3, 2006
9. Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor
within these boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked
with orange warning fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have
been approved to infringe within the buffer, wetland or water prior to any land
disturbing activities.
10.Turbidity Standard
The turbidity standard of 50 NTUs (Nephelometric Turbidity Units) shall not be
exceeded as described in 15 A NCAC 26..0200. Appropriate sediment and erosion
control practices must be used to meet this standard. Monitoring must occur during
the installation of culverts, be summarized and submitted to the Asheville Regional
Office in Report form.
11. No Impacts Beyond those in Application
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian
areas beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-construction
Notification. All construction activities, including the design, installation, operation,
and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall
be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules
occur.
12.Construction Stormwater Permit NCG010000
Upon the approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan issued by the
Division of Land Resources (DLR) or a DLR delegated local erosion and
sedimentation control program, an NPDES General stormwater permit
(NCG010000) administered by DWQ is automatically issued to the project, This
General Permit allows stormwater to be discharged during land disturbing
construction activities as stipulated by conditions in the permit. If your project is
covered by this permit [applicable to construction projects that disturb one (1) or
more acres], full compliance with permit conditions including the sedimentation
control plan, self-monitoring, record keeping and reporting requirements are
required. A copy of this permit and monitoring report forms may be found at
http-//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/Forms Documents.htm.
13.Deed Restrictions
Deed restrictions or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional
wetlands, waters and protective buffers in order to assure compliance from future
wetland, water and buffer impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to
impacting any wetlands, waters and/or buffers approved for impact under this
Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate.
Campus QuartersVer2
Page 5 of 7
July 3, 2006
14.Culvert Installation
Culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the
original stream profiles are not altered. Existing stream dimensions (including the
cross section dimensions, pattern, and longitudinal profile) must be maintained
above and below locations of each culvert. Culverts shall be designed and
installed to allow for aquatic life movement as well as to prevent head cutting of the
streams. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched, the appropriate
stream grade shall be re-established or, if the pipes installed in a perched manner,
the pipes shall be removed and re-installed correctly.
Culvert(s) shall not be installed in such a manner that will cause aggradation or
erosion of the stream up or down stream of the culvert(s). Existing stream
dimensions (including the cross section dimensions, pattern and longitudinal
profile) shall be maintained above and below locations of each culvert. Therefore,
you must provide plans with adequate details that indicate that the current stability
of the stream will be maintained or enhanced. You must receive written approval
from this Office for the above plans before the culvert(s) is installed. Culvert(s)
must be installed according to approved plans.
The establishment of native, woody vegetation and other soft stream bank
stabilization techniques must be used where practicable instead of rip rap or other
bank hardening methods. If rip-rap is necessary, it shall not be placed in the
stream bed, unless specifically approved by the Division of Water Quality.
Upon completion of the project, the Applicant shall complete and return the
enclosed "Certificate of Completion" form to notify NCDWQ when all work
included in the §401 Certification has been completed. The responsible party
shall complete the attached form and return it to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the NC
Division of Water Quality upon completion of the project. Please send
photographs upstream and downstream of each culvert site to document correct
installation along with the Certificate of Completion form.
15.Final Construction Drawings
Two copies of the final construction drawings shall be furnished to NCDWQ prior to
the pre-construction meeting.
16. Diffuse Flow (DWQ Reviewed Plans)
All stormwater shall be directed as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through
the protected stream buffers and will not re-concentrate before discharging into
the stream.
Campus QuartersVer2
Page 6 of 7
July 3,2006
If diffuse flow is not achieved, then the DWQ shall be notified and corrective
actions to restore diffuse flow shall be taken if necessary to impede the formation
of erosion gullies. At no time shall stormwater from the proposed development
be piped directly through the buffer without prior DWQ written authorization.
The structural stormwater practices as approved by this Office as well as
drainage patterns must be maintained in perpetuity. No changes to the structural
stormwater practices shall be made without written authorization from the
Division of Water Quality. Stormwater easements shall be recorded for a
distance of at least 10 feet on each side of all stormwater conveyances on all
lots containing these structures including future access for maintenance. The
stormwater easements shall allow for the ability to maintain the structures,
perform corrective actions as described above and shall provide protection of the
structures from potential alternations by future property owners.
An Operation & Maintenance (O&M) agreement signed by the current landowner must
be approved by the DWQ. This O&M agreement must transfer with the sale of the land
or transfer of responsibility for the stormwater facilities and the DWQ must be notified of
every transfer.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification
and may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your
proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application and
as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA
Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions,of this Certification (associated with the
approved wetland or stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You
must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing,
send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 1506 of the North Carolina General
Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,
N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you
ask for a hearing.
Campus QuartersVer2
Page 7 of 7
July 3,2006
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of
the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly in the
Central Office in Raleigh at 919-733-9721 or Kevin Barnett in the DWQ Asheville
Regional Office at either 828-296-4657 or at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
for an W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
AW Klkhb
Enclosures: GC 3402
Certificate of Completion
Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration
cc: Clement Riddle
Clearwater Environmental Consultants, Inc.
718 Oakland Street
Hendersonville, NC 28791
USACE Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Cyndi Karoly, DWQ 401 Central Office
DLR Asheville Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 06-0666. Camp usQuartersVersion2.ApprovalwithConditions
R CM@mOWE p
D
JUL 0 7 2-006

SAT ??QG
? r
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
June 12, 2006
DWQ Project # 06-0666
Henderson County
Chris Frame
Campus Quarters, LLC
Post Office Box 2283
Savannah, GA 31402
Subject Property: Campus Quarters
Henderson County
u? 6
JUN ? ? 200
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions R-WsTC hr T"_i Riy N
Dear Mr. Ball:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed
below, to place fill within or otherwise impact 0.25 acres of wetlands and 60 linear feet
of perennial streams for the purpose of road developement at the subject property, as
described within your application received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
on April 17, 2006. After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts
are covered by General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3402 (GC3402). The
Certification (s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 39 when issued by the US Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE). In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with
any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project
including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, Non-discharge, stormwater
and buffer regulations. Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts
onto conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose that you described in your application. If you change
your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application.
If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and
approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total fills
for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of
stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506
(h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 i4lail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet htto:Ilh2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Note iCarolina
Natitralk,/
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Campus Quarters
Page2 of7
June 12, 2006
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific
and general conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met.
No other impacts are approved including incidental impacts:
Amount
Approved Units Plan Location or Reference
Wetland 0.23 acres
Wetland 0.02 acres
Stream 60 (feet) UT to Bat Fork Creek
2. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all
specifications governing the proper design, installation and operation and
maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to protect surface
waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be
designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning
and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and
erosion control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the
requirements specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on
all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including
contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be
designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most
recent version of the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the
reclamation in accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation
Pollution Control Act.
3. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian
areas beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction
Notification. All construction activities, including the design, installation, operation,
and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices,
shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes,
or rules occur.
Campus Quarters
Page3 of 7
June 12, 2006
4. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters
to the maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control
devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the
natural grade restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land
Resources has released the project.
5. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification
or applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is
required to return the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit,
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC,
27699-1650.
6. Diffuse Flow (No Review)
All constructed stormwater conveyance outlets shall be directed and maintained as
diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through the protected stream buffers such that
it will not re-concentrate before discharging into a stream.
7. Mitigation
The Division of Water Quality has determined that protecting all remaining streams
and wetlands on the property, with 25 foot buffers measured from the top of bank on
both sides of the streams and wetlands, and the removal of all remaining, unutilized
culverts with stream restoration throughout the property shall offset the impact
associated with this activity. Deed Restrictions or Conservation Easements shall be
placed on the protected waters and a copy of the signed easements or recorded
restrictions must be submitted to this office within 30 days of issuance of this
Certification.
8. Buffer Re-establishemnt
A 25 foot woody buffer, from the top of each bank, shall be established on all
jurisdictional waters throughout the subject +/-27.18 acres, where none currently
exist, to preserve water quality. All buffer re-establishment shall be in accordance
with the Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration. (See attached)
Campus Quarters
Page4 of7
June 12, 2006 <
9. Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor
within these boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked
with orange warning fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have
been approved to infringe within the buffer, wetland or water prior to any land
disturbing activities.
10. Turbidity Standard
The turbidity standard of 50 NTUs (Nephelometric Turbidity Units) shall not be
exceeded as described in 15 A NCAC 26..0200. Appropriate sediment and erosion
control practices must be used to meet this standard. Monitoring must occur during
the installation of culverts, be summarized and submitted to the Asheville Regional
Office in Report form.
11. No Impacts Beyond those in Application
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian
areas beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-construction
Notification. All construction activities, including the design, installation, operation,
and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall
be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules
occur.
12.Construction Stormwater Permit NCG010000
Upon the approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan issued by the
Division of Land Resources (DLR) or a DLR delegated local erosion and
sedimentation control program, an NPDES General stormwater permit
(NCG010000) administered by DWQ is automatically issued to the project. This
General Permit allows stormwater to be discharged during land disturbing
construction activities as stipulated by conditions in the permit. If your project is
covered by this permit [applicable to construction projects that disturb one (1) or
more acres], full compliance with permit conditions including the sedimentation
control plan, self-monitoring, record keeping and reporting requirements are
required. A copy of this permit and monitoring report forms may be found at
http-Ah2o enrstate.nc.us/su/Forms Documents.htm.
13.Deed Restrictions
Deed restrictions or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional
wetlands, waters and protective buffers in order to assure compliance from future
wetland, water and buffer impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to
impacting any wetlands, waters and/or buffers approved for impact under this
Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate.
Campus Quarters
Pages of7
June 12, 2006
14.Culvert Installation
Culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the
original stream profiles are not altered. Existing stream dimensions (including the
cross section dimensions, pattern, and longitudinal profile) must be maintained
above and below locations of each culvert. Culverts shall be designed and
installed to allow for aquatic life movement as well as to prevent head cutting of the
streams. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched, the appropriate
stream grade shall be re-established or, if the pipes installed in a perched manner,
the pipes shall be removed and re-installed correctly.
Culvert(s) shall not be installed in such a manner that will cause aggradation or
erosion of the stream up or down stream of the culvert(s). Existing stream
dimensions (including the cross section dimensions, pattern and longitudinal
profile) shall be maintained above and below locations of each culvert. Therefore,
you must provide plans with adequate details that indicate that the current stability
of the stream will be maintained or enhanced. You must receive written approval
from this Office for the above plans before the culvert(s) is installed. Culvert(s)
must be installed according to approved plans.
The establishment of native, woody vegetation and other soft stream bank
stabilization techniques must be used where practicable instead of rip rap or other
bank hardening methods. If rip-rap is necessary, it shall not be placed in the
stream bed, unless specifically approved by the Division of Water Quality.
Upon completion of the project, the Applicant shall complete and return the
enclosed "Certificate of Completion" form to notify NCDWQ when all work
included in the §401 Certification has been completed. The responsible party
shall complete the attached form and return it to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the NC
Division of Water Quality upon completion of the project. Please send
photographs upstream and downstream of each culvert site to document correct
installation along with the Certificate of Completion form.
15.Final Construction Drawings
Two copies of the final construction drawings shall be furnished to NCDWQ prior to
the pre-construction meeting. Written verification shall be provided that the final
construction drawings comply with the attached permit drawings contained in the
amended Application dated July 1, 2005.
16. Diffuse Flow (DWQ Reviewed Plans)
All stormwater shall be directed as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through
the protected stream buffers and will not re-concentrate before discharging into
the stream.
Campus Quarters
Page6 of 7
June 12, 2006
If diffuse flow is not achieved, then the DWQ shall be notified and corrective
actions to restore diffuse flow shall be taken if necessary to impede the formation
of erosion gullies. At no time shall stormwater from the proposed development
be piped directly through the buffer without prior DWQ written authorization.
The structural stormwater practices as approved by this Office as well as
drainage patterns must be maintained in perpetuity. No changes to the structural
stormwater practices shall be made without written authorization from the
Division of Water Quality. Stormwater easements shall be recorded for a
distance of at least 10 feet on each side of all stormwater conveyances on all
lots containing these structures including future access for maintenance. The
stormwater easements shall allow for the ability to maintain the structures,
perform corrective actions as described above and shall provide protection of the
structures from potential alternations by future property owners.
An Operation & Maintenance (O&M) agreement signed by the current landowner must
be approved by the DWQ. This O&M agreement must transfer with the sale of the land
or transfer of responsibility for the stormwater facilities and the DWQ must be notified of
every transfer.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification
and may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your
proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application and
as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA
Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the
approved wetland or stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You
must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing,
send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,
N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you
ask for a hearing.
Campus Quarters
Page 7 of 7
June 12, 2006
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of
the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly in the
Central Office in Raleigh at 919-733-9721 or Kevin Barnett in the DWQ Asheville
Regional Office at either 828-296-4657 or at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
AW Klkhb
Enclosures: GC 3402
Certificate of Completion
Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration
cc: Clement Riddle
Clearwater Environmental Consultants, Inc.
300 North Main Street
Hendersonville, NC 28792
USACE Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Cyndi Karoly, DWQ 401 Central Office
DLR Asheville Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 06-0666.CampusQuarters.ApprovalwithConditions
Triage Check List
Date: 4/24/06
Kevin Barnett, Asheville Regional Office
To:
Project Name: Campus Quarters
DWQ #:06-0666
County: Henderson
60-day Processing Time: 4/17/06 to 6/15/06

From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone: [phone]
The file attached is being forwarded to you for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Dote that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to.
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks!
1 i

CLEARWATER ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
April 11, 2006
Mr. Steve Chapin
US Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Ave, Rm 208
Asheville NC 28801-2638
RE: Campus Quarters
Henderson County NC
Mr. Chapin,
U
{ l r?i L
Enclosed please find a Pre-Construction Notification application for 27-acre development
project located in Henderson County, NC. Proposed impacts include the placement of a
pipe with associated fill material for an access road crossing. Currently the northern
unnamed tributary on the property flows into a manmade wetland ditch, which eventually
connects to Bat Fork Creek. The proposed development involves filling the linear
wetland ditch and routing the stream flow into the wetland area associated with it. Small
fringe portions of the wetland area will be filled. A vicinity map, a site location map, and
design/impact drawings are included with the application for your review.
On behalf of Campus Quarters, LLC, we are requesting authorization through
Nationwide Permit No. 39. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. If you have any
questions, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
R. Clement Riddle
Principal
cc: Dave McHenry, NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Q11@1Rae1Rp
APR 1 7 2006
WETLANQS AND STWATERMJWAT?A: BRANCH
224 South Grove Street, Suite F
Hendersonville, North Carolina 28792
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.cwenv.com
7
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
vi auy pw muiar u.nm is nor appucame to tms project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP #39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina. Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), c
II. Applicant Information
APR 1 7 2006
1. Owner/Applicant Information DENR . WATER
Name: Chris Frame wE>w?l?sAr? ST QUALiTy
Mailing Address: Campus Quarters, LLC
PO Box 2283
Savannah GA 31402
Telephone Number: 912.233.7578 Fax Number: 912.239.9599
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: R. Clement Riddle
Company Affiliation: C1earWater Environmental Consultants Inc.
Mailing Address: 224 S Grove St, Ste F
Hendersonville NC 28792
Telephone Number: 828.698.9800 Fax Number: 828.698.9003
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 5
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Campus Quarters
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 9588020399
4. Location
County: Henderson Nearest Town: Flat Rock
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): I-26 south. West on
Upward Rd. in Hendersonville. North onto S. Allen Dr. West onto Campus Dr. The site is
located to the south of Campus Dr. after approximately 0.3 miles
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.24505 ON 82.21960 °W
6. Property size (acres): 27.18
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Bat Fork Creek
8. River Basin: French Broad
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application:_ Currently the site is undeveloped and is heavil vegetated
with early successional and invasive species. The majority of the surrounding land use is
institutional development consisting of Blue Ridge Communi College the fire training
school, and health care centers.
Page 6
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall proiect involves the construction of a residential development Heavy machinery
will be utilized to arade and prepare the roadbeds and building pads for construction
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed work is to
construct a residential subdivision.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
USACE site visit on January 25, 2006. Wetland verification received on February 25, 2006
(Action ID 20063048)
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Proposed impacts include the
placement of a pipe with associated fill material in the southernmost UT for an access road
crossing. Currently the northern UT on the property is draining into a manmade wetland
Page 7
ditch, which flows to the north and into Bat Fork Creek The proposed development involves
filling the linear wetland ditch and routing the stream flow into the wetland area associated
with it. Small fringe portions of the wetland area will be filled
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flondinu
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
1 fill forested No 10 0.23
2 fill Manmade ditch No 0 0.02

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.16
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width. then divide by 43.560.
Stream Impact
Number
indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
3 UT of Bat Fork Cr. culvert perennial 4 60 0.005 .

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 60 0.005
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Page 8
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc. Area of
Impact
(acres)
N/A

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.005
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.25
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.25
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 60
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
N/A
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Only one stream crossing of
the southern UT is planned for avoidance/minimization. The area to be filled on the northern UT
is limited to the manmade ditch area. Wetland fill has been limited to the frjnizes of the wetland
Page 9
area so that a riparian/wetland corridor will remain. 0.92 acres of wetlands and 3,176 linear feet
of stream were avoided.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnn.gide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
No mitigation is proposed as impacts are minimal.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/wm/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Page 10
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify V Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
I Zone* I Impact I Multiplier Required I
lenllnrP f-fr
1 N/A 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0244, or.0260. N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss stormwater
controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property. If
percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations demonstrating total proposed
impervious level. Stormwater ponds are proposed for the site Upon receipt of the 401 certification a
detailed stormwater management plan will be designed for the site and submitted for NCDWO approval.
XU. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The development will connect to an existing sanitary sewer line on the site
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes E] No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: N/A
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Page 12
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
8202510011 VV
z
M WG 84 8202500"
0
a0
T-i
0
?

i
#
-Gr
ter- ?
NC
44 kA
# I-
t. rF
y ?
+l fi
#*• o o '.
00.
`Q? -- PROJECT SITE
A rut: :N
1 i
ara' a par.
h Sc
IF A
z
0
O
w
7--I
0
Lr)
82026'00" W WG 84 82° 2510011 W
MN TN 1JIICE:
0 1000 FEET 0 1000 METERS
Map created with TOPO10 02003 National geographic (www.nationalgeographic.comltopo)
CLEARWATER
29-Acre Tract Environmental Consultants, Inc.
USGS Topographic Map
Henderson County, N.C. 224 South Grove Street, Suite F
Hendersonville, NC 28792 Figure 2
828-698-9800
WETLAND VITCH
I
h
\
1
I
Project Area
Total Wetland Area
Total Streams
Proposed Wetland Impact
Proposed Streams Impact
Wetland Avoidance
Stream Avoidance
27.18 tAc
1.16 tAc.
5,256 Lf.
0.25 tAc
60 Lf.
.Q2 tAc.
3,176 Lf.
\
\ UPON
\ M /
\
\
y
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
I
-- C?a PIPE
(3)
J
1 11
1
11
1
11
Corp Permit
S.d. P=soo'-o'

or
m
m
a?
.e?
R o
mz
of
? z
a
J
O
QK
U
I
t-
0
?n Z
- 1
3
o ?
g
6
a
r ?
J
o m
U ?
Z p
N
w ,
0
w
3
c
0
?c
6
p# O
i
SHEET o,
*FOR SECTION 404/401 PERMITTING
PURPOSES ONLY
d
z
' wwo
U
2
CULVERT TO BE EMBEDDED 6 TO 12 \\
INCHES INTO EXISTING
STREAMBED IN ACCORDANCE WITH '
AGENCY RECOMMENDATIONS
NOT TO SCALE
Proposed Grade
\\\\\/ Existing
z , Streambank
6-12 inches
Z
Cj)
L
=
0
ca w
:3 U
0 0
?0
GL
mU
U?
R
?o
LL
N MQ
co Z
N mwcb
rn
m'Sm?
N
y 'O C mm
?
aLL
U
C
U
L. ?
c
? E
V o
c
W
*FOR SECTION 404/401 PERMITTING
PURPOSES ONLY
yW?.
W Lo 0
0
U
Z
PROPOSED FILL
MATERIAL
EXISTING WETLAND AREA
NEW BUILDING AREA
0 ft.
""INNNN?_ . •;
NOT TO SCALE
0
12
D
J °c
m
J =
L LL
Z
W
CL -j
EU
U
Q a
g
3 ,
a
N
Of
LL hN S
m N
UU?
Z
cn 005
N
U' m m ao
vvao
`?=aLL
•?-? c
c
0
U
c
E
•--• c
Q
c
W
from: Chris Frame 912 239.9599 To: Clement Riddle Date: 4/4/2006 Time: 11:31:38 AM Page 2 of 2
P-O. Box 2283 - Savannah, Georgia 31402
phone: [phone] • fax: [phone]
CAMPUS QUARTERS, LLC
April 4, 2006
Mr. K Clement Riddle
Clearwater Environmental Consultants, Inc.
224 South Grove Street, Suite F
Hendersonville, N.C. 28792
RE: Campus Quarters, LLC
Dear Clement:
This is in regard to our telephone conversation yesterday, regarding authorizing you to
act as agent for the 404 pennit application. Therefom on behalf of me, Christopher
Frame, you are hereby authorized to act as the agent for Campus Quarters, LLC in
Henderson County, NC pertaining to all wetlands pemiitting matters on the above
refcrenced project.
Should you need any other information or authorization, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
pher K. Frame
Managing Partner
[e-mail]
i
Preliminary Threatened and Endangered Species Assessment
for Campus Quarters
Henderson County, North Carolina
April 11, 2006
1.0 Introduction
The following report details methods used and an assessment of survey results for a
threatened and endangered (T&E) species survey and habitat assessment for the
Hendersonville Home Systems. The T&E species survey was conducted to determine the
occurrence of or the potential for animal and plant species listed as federally threatened or
endangered to exist on the proposed site. Completion of this survey was directed by and
complies with current state and federal regulations [Federal Endangered Species Act of
1973 (16 USC 1531-1543) and the North Carolina Endangered Species Act (N.C.G.S.
Sect. 113 article 25) and North Carolina Plant Protection and Conservation Act of 1979
(N.C.G.S. Sect. 19b 106:202.12-22).
The referenced site is accessed from College Drive in Henderson County, North Carolina
(Figure 1).
2.0 Methodology
A preliminary protected species survey was conducted in April 2006, on the proposed
Campus Quarters site by C1earWater Environmental Consultants, Inc. to determine potential
for occurrences of animal and plant species listed as endangered or threatened by current
Federal or State regulations.
Correspondence solicited from the USFWS provided existing data concerning the presence
or potential occurrence of threatened or endangered species in Henderson County, North
Carolina. The USFWS lists the following eight federally threatened and endangered species
as occurring or potentially occurring in Henderson County (Appendix A).
Common Name Scientific Name Status
Oyster Mussel E iohlasma ca saeformus Endangered
Swam ink Heloni ii hullata Threatened
Appalachian elktoe Alasmidonata raveneliana Endangered
Small whorled ogonia Isotria medeoloides Threatened
bunched arrowhead Sa ittaria asiculata Endangered
mountain sweet pitcher plant Samwenia jonesii Endangered
White irisette Sisyrinchium dichotomion Endangered
bog turtle Clemm s muhlenhurgii Threatened*
Threatened due to smulanty of appearance with northem bog turtle
The protected species audit consisted of a pedestrian survey by C1earWater Environmental
Consultants staff. During field surveys, site habitats were identified and compared with
recognized habitats for each of the eight species potentially occurring on the site. Potential
flora and fauna were identified to the taxonomic unit level necessary to determine if the
observed specimen was a protected species.
3.0 Habitat Classification
During our site visits in January 2005 and April 2006, four habitats: agricultural field,
shrub/scrub wetland, upland hardwood forest, and streambed and bank were identified on
the property. The following is a description of each of the four habitat types identified on
the referenced site and its likelihood to harbor or support listed species.
3.1 Agricultural field
The site contains several agricultural fields. Some of the fields have been
maintained within the past year and contain various common upland field grasses.
Some of the fields do not appear to have been maintained within the past two
years. These areas have become overgrown with multiflora rose (Rosa
multiflora). This habitat is not suitable for any of the listed species.
3.2 Shrub/Scrub Wetland
This habitat occurs in a flat area located in the north central portion of the property
and adjacent to an unnamed tributary to Bat Fork Creek. This wetland appears to be
regularly flooded by Bat Fork Creek. The wetland has been historically altered
through clearing and ditching. The wetland ditch portions of this habitat remain
inundated and contain an obligate wetland plant community. The wetland has been
mowed in the past and is heavily infested with multiflora rose. Additional species
observed include red maple (Acer rubrum) and river birch (Betula nigra) in the
overstory. Plants observed in the shrub layer include muliflora rose, Chinese privet
(Ligustrum sinense), blackberry (Rubus sp.), and elderberry (Sambucus canadensis).
Herbaceous species observed include N.Y. lronweed (Vernonia noveboracensis),
soft rush (Juncus effuses), several species of sedges (Carex spp.), jewelweed
(Impatiens capensis), and cattails (Typha latifolia).
3.3 Upland Hardwood Forest
This habitat occurs on the northeastern comer of the site adjacent to College Drive.
Species observed within the overstory of this community include white oak
(Quercus alba), southern red -oak (Quercus falcata), Hickory (Carya tomentosa),
yellow poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), and white pine (Pinus strobus). The
understory and shrub layer contain blackberry, multiflora rose, black cherry (Prunus
serotina), serviceberry (Amelanchier laevis), and American holly (Ilex opaca).
Species observed in the herbaceous layer included Christmas fern (Polystichum
acrostichoides), blackberry (Rubes sp.), and poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans).
This habitat is not suitable for listed species. Therefore, impact to this habitat is not
likely to affect listed species.
3.4 Stream Bed and Bank
This freshwater habitat includes the streambeds and banks of unnamed tributaries to
Bat Fork Creek. These creeks have shallow banks and the bed material is a mixture
of sand, silt, and smaller gravel. Permanently rooted aquatic plants are practically
non-existent in these streams. The tributary banks are dominated by shrubs and
herbs including multiflora rose, elderberry, blackberry, yellow root (Xanthorhiza
simplicissima), jewelweed, cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamomea), and Christmas
fern. Suitable habitat for listed species was not found within this habitat type.
4.0 Listed species and Acknowledged Habitats
The following is a brief description of each listed species included in the survey, its
recognized habitat and comments regarding survey results for that species:
4.1 Mountain sweet pitcher plant, federally listed as an endangered
species is a perennial herb, the mountain sweet pitcher plant grows from 21 to
73 inches tall. Its numerous and erect leaves grow in clusters and are hollow
and trumpet-shaped, forming slender, almost tubular pitchers with a heart-
shaped hood. The pitchers are a waxy dull green with criss-crossing maroon-
purple veins. The hair inside the pitchers' tube is usually bent downward, and
the tubes are often partially filled with liquid and decayed insect parts.
Flowers of the mountain sweet pitcher plant are usually maroon with
recurving petals. The stalks are erect and bear one flower each. Flowering
and fruiting occurs April - June. Restricted to bogs and streamsides on
granite rock faces along the Blue Ridge Divide, this plant's populations are
generally found in level depressions associated with floodplains. A few
populations can be found along the sides of waterfalls on granite rock faces.
Herbs and shrubs usually dominate the bogs where these plants are located,
but there may be a few scattered trees. The bog soils are deep, poorly-drained
combinations of loam, sand, and silt, with a high organic matter content and a
medium to highly acidic composition. Potentially suitable habitat is not
present at the wetland area for mountain sweet pitcher plant (Sarracenia
jonesii), therefore impacts to this species are unlikely.
4.2 Bunched arrowhead, federally listed as an endangered species is an
emersed aquatic perennial herb, which grows 6 to 13 inches in height. Its
spatulate-shaped leaves reach 3 decimeters (12 inches long) and 2 centimeters
(three-fourths of an inch) wide, and stem from the base of the plant. The
flowering stalk is erect, with upper flowers male and lower flowers female.
Male flowers have three reflexed sepals, three white petals, and numerous
stamens with pubescent, dilated filaments. Female flowers have three
spreading or reflexed sepals, three white petals, and numerous separate
carpels. The stalks of the lowest whorl of flowers ascend in fait, and the
fruiting head is of numerous achenes. Flowering and fruiting occurs from May
to July. Bunched arrowhead grows in seepage areas, which have little or no
net flow but are not stagnant. The soil in the seepages can be characterized as
sandy loams overtopped by a muck layer ranging in depth from 25 to 60
centimeters. Shaded sites have larger, more vigorous plants than open areas.
Potentially, suitable habitat for this species is found within inundated portions
of the wetland area however this plant was not observed during the survey. In
addition, the high degree of manmade disturbance on the site makes this
species occurrence unlikely; therefore impacts to this species are unlikely.
4.3 Appalachian elktoe, federally listed as an endangered species has a
thin, but not fragile, kidney-shaped shell, reaching up to about 3.2 inches in
length, 1.4 inches in height, and 1 inch in width (Clarke 1981). Juveniles
generally have a yellowish-brown periostracum (outer shell surface) while the
periostracum of the adults is usually dark brown to greenish-black in color.
Although rays are prominent on some shells, particularly in the posterior
portion of the shell, many individuals have only obscure greenish rays. The
shell nacre (inside shell surface) is shiny, often white to bluish-white,
changing to a salmon, pinkish, or brownish color in the central and beak
cavity portions of the shell; some specimens may be marked with irregular
brownish blotches (adapted from Clarke 1981). Only two populations of the
species are known to survive. The healthiest of these populations exists in the
main stem of the Little Tennessee River between Emory Lake at Franklin,
Macon County, North Carolina, and Fontana Reservoir in Swain County,
North Carolina. The second population occurs in the Nolichucky River
system. The Appalachian elktoe has been reported from relatively shallow,
medium-sized creeks and rivers with cool, well-oxygenated, moderate- to fast-
flowing water. It has been observed in gravelly substrates often mixed with
cobble and boulders, in cracks in bedrock, and occasionally in relatively silt-
free, coarse, sandy substrates (Department of the Interior 1994). Stream type
and substrates observed were not suitable for this species, therefore impacts to
this species are unlikely.
4.4 Small-whorled pogonia, federally listed as an endangered species
occurs on upland sites in mixed-deciduous or mixed-deciduous/coniferous
forest that are generally in second or third growth successional stages.
Characteristics common to most sites include sparse to moderate ground cover
in the species' microhabitat, a relatively open understory canopy, and
proximity to features that create long persisting breaks in the forest canopy.
Soils at most sites are highly acidic and nutrient poor, with moderately high
soil moisture values. Light availability could be a limiting factor for this
species. The stem is smooth, hollow pale green and 3.7-9.8 inches tall with a
single whorl of 5 to 6 light green elliptical leaves 3 inches long and 1.6 inches
wide. A flower is borne at the top of the stem. It is distinguished from the
similar L verticillata by the latter's purplish stem and long, dark sepals.
Suitable habit for this species was not observed onsite. It is unlikely that
development of this site will have an adverse impact on small-whorled
pogonia.
4.5 Swamp pink, federally listed as a threatened species is found in
wetlands that are saturated but not flooded. This would include southern
Appalachian bogs and swamps. Swamp pink would also be found in Atlantic
white cedar swamps and swampy forests bordering small streams, boggy
meadows and spring seepage areas. This species is commonly associated with
some evergreens, including white cedar, pitch pine, American larch, and black
spruce. It can be distinguished by its basal rosette of light green, lance-shaped
and parallel-veined leaves with a hollow-stemmed flower stalk that can grow
8-35 inches during flowering and up to 5 feet during seed maturation.
Flowering occurs March through May and flowers are clustered (30-50) at the
tip of the stem, in a bottlebrush shape. During this survey no specimens of
swamp pink or typically associated evergreens were observed in the wetland
areas. It is unlikely that development of this site will impact this species.
4.6 The Oyster mussel is a small (maximum about 70 millimeters or 2.1
inches) freshwater mussel (Neves 1991). Its periostracum (outer shell surface)
has a dull to sub-shiny yellowish to green colored shell with numerous narrow
dark green rays. The oyster mussel inhabits small to medium rivers (Dennis
1985) in areas with coarse sand to boulder substratum (rarely in mud) and
moderate to swift currents (Gordon 1991). It is sometimes found associated
with water-willow (Justicia americana) beds (Gordon and Layzer 1989) and
in pockets of gravel between bedrock ledges in areas of swift current (Neves
1991). The USFWS has no current records of the species in North Carolina; it
was last collected in North Carolina in 1913 (Ortmann 1918). The small
unnamed tributaries are not suitable habitat for the oyster mussel.
4.7 White Irisette, federally listed as an endangered species is found in rich,
basic soils probably weathered from amphibolite, in clearings and the edges of
upland woods where the canopy is thin and often where downslope runoff has
removed much of the deep litter layer ordinarily present on these sites. Flowering
occurs from late May to July. White hisette grows in a dichotomously-branching
pattern. 4-8 inches tall; basal leaves are pale bluish-green: tiny white flowers (.3
inch) with reflexed petals in a cluster of 4-6 at the ends of winged stems; fait is
round w/3-6 seeds. White flowers and dichotomous branching pattern distinguish
it from similar species. Suitable habitat for this species was not observed,
therefore impacts to this species during development is unlikely.
4.8 Bog turtle, federally listed as a threatened species by similarity of
appearance with the northern bog turtle. Bog turtles are easily distinguished from
other turtles by the large, conspicuous bright orange, yellow or red blotch found
on each side of the head. Adult bog turtle shells are 3 to 4-1/2 inches in length and
range in color from light brown to ebony. Habitat would include sunlit marshy
meadows, spring seepages, wet cow pastures, and bogs. The preference would be
narrow, shallow, slow-moving rivulets. The southern population of the bog turtle,
ranging from southern Virginia to northern Georgia, is also protected with a
threatened designation because its physical appearance is similar to the northern
population. The southern bog turtle population is separated from the northern
population by approximately 250 miles. However, individual bog turtles in the
southern population closely resemble individuals in the northern bog turtle
population, causing difficulty in enforcing prohibitions protecting the northern
population. Therefore, the Service is designating the southern population as
"threatened (similarity of appearance)." This designation prohibits collecting
individual turtles from this population and bans interstate and international
commercial trade. As per USFWS guidance, It has no effect on land management
activities of private landowners in southern states where the bog turtle lives. No
suitable habitats were found in the project area for this species; therefore impacts
to this species are unlikely.
Findings
Three habitats found on site, agricultural field, upland hardwood forest, and
stream bed and bank do not match acknowledged suitable habitat for any of the
listed species described above. Shrub/scrub wetland does provide suitable habitat
for bunched arrowhead, however this species was not observed during the survey.
In addition the high degree of manmade disturbance on-site, make the occurrence of
this species unlikely.
5.0 Conclusion
During completion of threatened and endangered species habitat assessments for the
Campus Quarters site, no listed species were observed. Based upon the available habitat, it
is the opinion of C1earWater Environmental Consultants, Inc. that federally and state
protected species are not likely to be affected from this project. As such, development of
the proposed area is not likely to cause and adverse impact to any threatened or endangered
species or potential habitat for threatened and endangered species.
Although no threatened and endangered species were identified during this survey,
because of the transitory nature of some of the listed threatened and endangered species
and the particular flower/fruiting periods of some plants, it is possible that endangered
species populations and locations may change over time. Therefore, any potential
findings at a later date should be fully investigated and coordinated with appropriate
agencies to prevent potential adverse impacts.
APPENDIX A
Henderson County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern, ... Page 1 of 2
Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of
Concern, and Candidate Species,
Henderson County, North Carolina
Updated: 03-29-2006
Common Name
Vertebrate:
Bog turtle
Eastern small-footed bat
Green salamander
Hellbender
Mountain blotched chub
Pygmy salamander
Southern Appalachian eastern
woodrat
Yellow-bellied sapsucker
(Southern Appalachian
population)
Invertebrate:
Appalachian elktoe
Diana fritillary (butterfly)
French Broad crayfish
Oyster mussel
Tennessee heelsplitter
Vascular Plant:
Blue Ridge Ragwort
Bog asphodel
Bunched arrowhead
Butternut
Scientific name
Federal Record Status
Status
Clemmys muhlenbergii T (S/A)
Myotis leibii FSC
Aneides aeneus FSC
Cryptobranchus alleganiensis FSC
ErimystaX insignis eristigma FSC
Desmognathus wrighti FSC
Neotoma floridana haematoreia FSC
Sphyrapicus varius
appalachiensis
Alasmidonta raveneliana
Speyeria diana
Cambarus reburrus
Epioblasma capsaeformis
Lasmigona holstonia
Packera millefolium
Narthecium americanum
Sagittaria fasciculata
Juglans cinerea
FSC
Current
Current
Current
Current
Obscure
Current
Current
Current
E Current
FSC Current
FSC Obscure
E Historic and Obscure
FSC Current
FSC Historic
C Historic
E Current
FSC Current
http://nc-es.fws.gov/es/cntylist/henderson.htnil 4/11/2.006
. Henderson County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern, ... Page 2 of 2
Fort Mountain sedge
Fraser's loosestrife
French Broad heartleaf
Gray's lily
Large-flowered barbara's-
buttons
Mountain catchfly
Mountain heartleaf
Mountain sweet pitcherplant
New Jersey rush
Small whorled pogonia
Small-leaved meadow-rue
Swamp pink
Sweet pinesap
White fiingless orchid
White irisette
Nonvascular plant:
Carex communis var. FSC Current
amplisquama
Lysimachia fraseri FSC Obscure
Hexastylis rhombiformis FSC Current
Lilium grayi FSC Historic
Marshallia grandiora FSC Historic
Silene ovata FSC Current
Hexastylis contracta FSC Current
Sarracenia rubra ssp. jonesii E Current
Juncus caesariensis FSC Current
Isotria medeoloides T Current
Thalictrum macrostylum FSC Historic
Helonias bullata T Current
Monotropsis odorata FSC Obscure
Platanthera integrilabia C Historic
Sisyrinchium dichotomum E Current
Definitions of Federal Status Codes:
E = endangered. A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
T = threatened. A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range."
P = proposed. A taxon proposed for official listing as endangered or threatened.
C = candidate. A taxon under consideration for official listing for which there is sufficient information
to support listing. (Formerly "C1" candidate species.)
FSC = federal species of concern. A species under consideration for listing, for which there is
insufficient information to support listing at this time. These species may or may not be listed in the
future, and many of these species were formerly recognized as "C2" candidate species.
T(S/A) = threatened due to similarity of appearance. A species that is threatened due to similarity of
appearance with other rare species and is listed for its protection. These species are not biologically
endangered or threatened and are not subject to Section 7 consultation.
EXP = experimental population. A taxon listed as experimental (either essential or nonessential).
Experimental, nonessential populations of endangered species (e.g., red wolf) are treated as threatened
species on public land, for consultation purposes, and as species proposed for listing on private land.
Definitions of "Record Status" qualifiers:
Current - the species has been observed in the county within the last 50 years.
Historic - the species was last observed in the county more than 50 years ago.
Obscure - the date and/or location of observation is uncertain.
Incidental/migrant - the species was observed outside of its normal range or habitat.
Probable/potential - the species is considered likely to occur in this county based on the proximity of
known records (in adjacent counties), the presence of potentially suitable habitat, or both.
http://nc-es.fws.gov/es/cntylist/benderson.html 4/11/2006
NC NHP Quad Search Pagel of 2
NC NHP Quad Search Results
New Search
Returned Elements: 48 using: HENDERSONVIL LE
[Invertebrate Animal 1] [Natural Community 11] [Nonvascula r Plant 2] [Vascular Plant 31] [Vertebrate An imal 3]
Major Grou p Scientific Name Common Name State Federal State Global Quad - Status Map -
Statu s Statu s Rank Rank Habitat
Invertebrate Macdunnoa brunnea
Animal A Mayfly SR None S2 G3G4 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Natural
Community Acidic cove forest None None None S5 G5 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Natural
Community Canada hemlock forest None None None S5 G5 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Natural
Community Chestnut oak forest None None None S5 G5 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Natural
Community Low elevation granitic dome None None None S1 G2 Hendersonville
Link
Current
Natural
Community Montane alluvial forest None None None S1 G2? Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Natural
Community Montane oak-hickory forest None None None S5 G5 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Natural Piedmont/mountain

Community semipermanent None None None S4 G5 Hendersonville- Link
impoundment Current -
Natural
Community PiedmonNmountain swamp None
forest None None S1 S2 G2 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Natural
Community Rich cove forest None None None S4 G4 Hendersonville
Link
Current
Natural
Community Southern appalachian bog
(southern subtype) None None None S1S2 G1G2T1T2 Hendersonville
Link
Current
Natural Swamp forest-bog complex N Hendersonville-
Community (typic subtype) one None None S3 G2G3T2
Current Link
Nonvascular Pannaria conoplea
Pl
t Mealy-rimmed Shingle SR
-D
None
S1
G3G4 Hendersonville-
an Lichen Current Link

Plant onvascular Sphagnum capillifolium
N
Northern Peatmoss
SR-P
None
S1
G5
Hendersonville-
Link
Historic -
Vascular
Plant Adlumie fungosa Climbing Fumitory SR-P None S2 G4 Hendersonville-
Link
Obscure -
Vascular
Plant Arethusa bulbosa Bog Rose E None S1 G4 Hendersonville-
Link
Historic
Vascular
Plant Campanula aparinoides Marsh Bellflower SR-P None S2 G5 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Vascular
Plant Carex barrattii Barratt's Sedge E None SH G4 Hendersonville-
Link
Historic
Vascular
Plant Carex pedunculata Longstalk Sedge SR-P None S2 G5 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Vascular
Plant Carex utriculata Beaked Sedge SR-P None S1 G5 Hendersonville-
Link
Historic
Vascular
Plant Carex verrucosa Warty Sedge SR-P None S2 G3G4 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Vascular
Plant Celastrus scandens American Bittersweet SR-P None S2? G5 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Vascular
Plant Epilobium ciliatum Purpleleaf Willowherb SR-P None S2 G5 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Vascular
Plant Eupatorium
godfreyanum Godfrey's
SR-P
None
S2
G4 Hendersonville-
Thorou hwort
g
Historic Link
-
Vascular
Plant Hasteola suaveolens Sweet Indian-plantain SR-T None SH G3 Hendersonville-
Link
Historic
Vascular
Plant Helenium brevifolium Littleleaf Sneezeweed E None S2 G3G4 Hendersonville-
Link
Historic
http://207.4.179.3 8/nhp/quad.php 4/11/2006
NC NHP Quad Search Page 2 of 2
ular
Plant Helonias bullata Swamp Pink T-SC T S2 G3 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Vascular Hexastylis contracts Mountain Heartleaf E FSC S1 G3 Hendersonville
Current Current Link
Vascular
Plant Hexas !is rhombiformis
tY French Broad
SR-L
FSC
S2
G2 Hendersonville-
Heartleaf Current Link
Vascular
Plant Isotria medeoloides Small Whorled E T S2 G2 Hendersonville-
Pogonia Current Link
Vascular
Plant Juncus caesariensis Rough Rush (=new E FSC S1 G2 Hendersonville-
Jersey Rush) Current Link
Vascular
Plant Lllium canadense ssp.
editorum Red Canada Lily
y -P
SR None S1 G5T4 Hendersonville-
Link
Obscure
Vascular
Plant Lonicera flava Yellow Honeysuckle SR-P None S2 G5? Hendersonville-
Link
Historic
ular
Plant Magnolia macrophylla Bigleaf Magnolia SR-P None S2 G5 Hendersonville-
Link
Current -
Vascular
Plant Marshallia grandiflora Large-flowered
Barbara's
b
tt
SR-T
FSC
SH
G2 Hendersonville
Link
-
u
ons Historic
ular
Plant Myrica gale Sweet Gale E None S1 G5 Hendersonville-
Link
Current -
Vascular
Plant Narthecium americanum Bog Asphodel E C SX G2 Hendersonville-
Link
Historic
Vascular
Plant Packera millefolium Divided-leaf Ragwort T FSC S2 G2 Hendersonville-
Link
Historic
Vascular
Pla
t Platanthera integrilabia White Fringeless E C SX G2G3 Hendersonville-
n Orchid Historic Link
ular
Plant Robinia hispida var. kelseyi Kelsey's Locust SR-0 None S1 G4T1 Hendersonville-
Link
Historic -
Vascular
Plant Sagittaria fasciculata Bunched Arrowhead E E S1 G1 Hendersonville-
Current Link
Vascular
Plant Sarraceniajonesii Mountain Sweet
E-SC
E
S1
G3T1
Hendersonville-
Pitcher Plant
Current Link
-
Vascular
Plant Stachys eplingii Epling's Hedge-nettle SR-T None SH G5 Hendersonville-
Link
Historic
Vascular
Pla
t Thermopsis fraxinifolia Ash-leaved Golden- SR
-T
None
S2?
G3? Hendersonville-
n banner Historic Link
Vascular
Plant Thermopsis mollls Appalachian Golden- SR
-P
None
S2
G3G4 Hendersonville-
banner Historic Link
Vertebrate
Animal Crotalus horridus Timber Rattlesnake SC None S3 G4 Hendersonville-
Link
Historic
An teabrate G/yptemys muhlenbergii Bog Turtle T T(S/A) S2 G3 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Vertebrate
Animal Mustela nivalis Least Weasel SR None S2 G5 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
NC NHP database updated: March, 2006.
Search performed on Tuesday, 11 April 2006 @ 09:55:35 EDST
Explanation of Codes
http://207.4.179.38/nhp/quad.php 4/11/2006
F
z
0
0
ao
TTi
0
U)
ry
l')
82026'00" W
WGS84 82025'00" W
7 2006
MN TILT D S 1 MILE.
$, X000 FEET 0 500 t0D0 METERS
Map created with TOPO!@ 02003 National Geographic (www.nationalgeographic.con-dtopo)
CLEARWATER
29-Acre Tract Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Henderson County, N.C. 224 South Grove Street, Suite F
Hendersonville, NC 28792
#4@&n?
USGS Topographic Map
Figure 2
82026'00" Ulf WGS84 82025'00" W
r
t j
g?w.,1' Y 2
! ??- .ty V
x n1

?
Y
rF ?

t 1
Y?
APR ? ? zoos
DENR -'HATER (QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STOPMwATER BRANCH
iNF
o
r - 3
N
(If
C
•cu
a)
00
01)
VJ
t?
C3 w
.
??N
? J-zz00
0
U
?j
(Q? oa°°N
a 00
O 'b
O
U QNx
WN
U
a> ^
a ?
a. o
a
x
R -1

CLEARWATER ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
April 11, 2006
Mr. Steve Chapin
US Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Ave, Rm 208
Asheville NC 28801-2638
RE: Campus Quarters
Henderson County NC
Mr. Chapin,

t
Enclosed please find a Pre-Construction Notification application for 27-acre development
project located in Henderson County, NC. Proposed impacts include the placement of a
pipe with associated fill material for an access road crossing. Currently the northern
unnamed tributary on the property flows into a manmade wetland ditch, which eventually
connects to Bat Fork Creek. The proposed development involves filling the linear
wetland ditch and routing the stream flow into the wetland area associated with it. Small
fringe portions of the wetland area will be filled. A vicinity map, a site location map, and
design/impact drawings are included with the application for your review.
On behalf of Campus Quarters, LLC, we are requesting authorization through
Nationwide Permit No. 39. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. If you have any
questions, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
e Y'&0?40
R. Clement Riddle
Principal
cc: Dave McHenry, NC Wildlife Resources Commission
API?., ? ??? lOpS
4 ' "'npS? - WA7'
ft sr QUAL/ry
084W__
224 South Grove Street, Suite F
Hendersonville, North Carolina 28792
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.cwenv.com

F
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
k11 ally JAULRoUldl null o nut appucame to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP #39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details check here: ?
9[2/;Z!k[90W[21
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information APR 1 7 2006
Name: Chris Frame a R - wqT
Mailing Address: Campus Quarters, LLC "Q ""U 5 1 ATERBRANCH
PO Box 2283
Savannah GA 31402
Telephone Number: 912.233.7578 Fax Number: 912.239.9599
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: R. Clement Riddle
Company Affiliation: ClearWater Environmental Consultants Inc.
Mailing Address: 224 S Grove St, Ste F
Hendersonville NC 28792
Telephone Number: 828.698.9800 Fax Number: 828.698.9003
E-mail Address: criddlekcwenv.com
Page 5
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Campus Quarters
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 9588020399
4. Location
County: Henderson Nearest Town: Flat Rock
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): I-26 south. West on
Upward Rd. in Hendersonville. North onto S. Allen Dr. West onto Campus Dr. The site is
located to the south of Campus Dr. after approximately 0.3 miles
Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.24505 ON 82.21960 °W
6. Property size (acres): 27.18
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Bat Fork Creek
8. River Basin: French Broad
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application:_ Currently the site is undeveloped and is heayily vegetated
with early successional and invasive species. The majority of the surrounding land use is
institutional development consisting of Blue Ridge Community College the fire training
school, and health care centers.
Page 6
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project involves the construction of a residential development Heavy machinery
will be utilized to Rrade and prepare the roadbeds and building pads for construction
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed work is to
construct a residential subdivision.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
USACE site visit on January 25, 2006. Wetland verification received on February 25, 2006
(Action ID 20063048)
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Proposed impacts include the
placement of a pipe with associated fill material in the southernmost UT for an access road
crossing. Currently the northern UT on the property is draining into a manmade wetland
Page 7
ditch, which flows to the north and into Bat Fork Creek The proposed development involves
filling the linear wetland ditch and routing the stream flow into the wetland area associated
with it. Small fringe portions of the wetland area will be filled
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
estno) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
linear feet Are]of
Imp
(acr
1 fill forested No 10 0.23
2 fill Manmade ditch No 0 0.02

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.16
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply leneth X width- then divide by 43.560
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
3 UT of Bat Fork Cr. culvert perennial 4 60 0.005

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 60 0.005
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Page 8
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)
N/A

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the nrniect-
Stream Impact (acres): 0.005
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.25
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.25
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 60
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Only one stream crossing of
the southern UT is planned for avoidance/minimization The area to be filled on the northern UT
is limited to the manmade ditch area. Wetland fill has been limited to the fringes of the wetland
Page 9
area so that a riparian/wetland corridor will remain. 0.92 acres of wetlands and 3,176 linear feet
of stream were avoided.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
No mitigation is proposed as impacts are minimal.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htnL If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Page 10
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX,
X.
Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* s uare feet Multiplier Mitig t on
1 N/A 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total I I
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0244, or.0260. N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss stormwater
controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property. If
percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations demonstrating total proposed
impervious level. Stormwater ponds are proposed for the site Upon receipt of the 401 certification a
detailed stormwater management plan will be designed for the site and submitted for NCDWO approval
XU. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The development will connect to an existing sanitary sewer line on the site
XIU. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: N/A
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Page 12
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
828-698-9800
CIXARWATER DENR - WATER QUALITY
29-Acre Tract Environmental Consultants, Inc. WffWM" 'taV
Henderson County, N.C. 224 South Grove Street, Suite F ' ap
Hendersonville, NC 28792 Figure 1
12026'00" V4
WGS84 E3202500" W
Jklao-j
?Gr
I Co
¦
4 o 4i}
z
0
W
.-i
O
y
:IQ
• f'Fr t f 4
; N PROJECT S ITE
?f -?' ?. i ?'?` 4 '_•? ?.. rl-fpn? .'-?- fi Ira. 12 Pai
T'^. s?`,.¦:.: a :J h p(? ?. ?__ ¦
jb-1 'k.
'e A 1-21
;rs
4% 0
f :gel
z
/'y?
'y
W
T-4
4
? p
76
tiz" 4-u -- VV WUt? b4 bZ'jZb'UU" W
MN TN U .5 1 M?? Arm.
6° 0 11000 FEET 0 1cm METERS
Map created with TOFO!0 02003 National Geographic (www.rnationalgeographic.comltopo)
CLEARWATER
29-Acre Tract Environmental Consultants, Inc.
USGS Topographic Map
Henderson County, N.C. 224 South Grove Street, Suite F Figure 2
Hendersonville, NC 28792
828-698-9800
Srap•suoid iltu"d daoa\ae?sapy\uol?an??su o?_ SU?uuaid\p ? yq\s?arajnad\,)

. •`(`?
.?• .....j VNnoavo H18ON
'AiNnOO NOS834N3H
.
• ??. x

?` Y?nanw?allM p?-f
aM-? lrool .4 M1w 011 ruMwr?u.N
?.aa-rs Iosl rw 1 WSW ?* --v P4" PI
ow
PS Ll ,L LL V n V ? l.[ .

??

=
?} earu
HOey eaYasaNln oN?NNtna aNn
•Y-d '081e13000d v gllulo '3 satlin'l nu"ad &10)0
o.r [l.

•? 4
O

!!YI CL's e__?
QQ

r L
a 4
8
g
z
°
?./
,
??
Q

0
o
o ,?
a

e / O
I
?
<+

Q J v
Q

J
+.m LI)? +1?
r ?N NO cvr
cv -m 0Q 13? sn

6 6
Q
fl-
.

d 6 6 6 ?

N c

6 6
N
O O
Q ?? 4 >

__
(3 o0
U- QL
O
?
OL F
-
F cD
z
0
H
O
Cy]
t"
by
G)?zc
Zm=r'-
0>M
1-C/) m
<?
z
?ooo
0DXm
n cn m
Z n Z W
D0?O
-_i y° 0
Z m
Cl) Zm 0
rn
O
= N

0
0
let
O?
o
0
0
U - ? -D
Cn
CD
/ j 0.
G) o
N) Q-
- Cn m , ??-
n tynv .
CD u) 'VV4)
CD 0)
U) ??•
A
?T
n
wn ww
224 S Grove St. Ste F SHEET NO.
C l e a rW a to r Hendersonville NC 28792 11nch = MA fee[ Campus Quarters
Phone: [phone]W TYPICAL ROAD CROSSING 4
Environmental Consultants, Inc. Fax: [phone] owe oy moe
=molecrNo_ am Campus Quarters _ Henderson County NC OF5
z
0
H
y
O
Cy]
t"
ti7
X
Cf)
Z
M
z
0
D
M
D
T
;1
O
U
D(n
M0
?-n
0
FV

f
S
i
oO
m
ran y
00
z
?o
0
b
z
m
03
C
?z
G)
D
D
V@[99w191
APR 17 2006
DENR, WATER QUALITY
WET ANDO AND bfiOR"A` ! BRANCH
NN I
Ci { / 224 S Gwe St. Ste F J Campus Quarters SHEET NO.
e a r V,r/ a r Hendersonville NC 28792 1 Inch = N/A feet
to
Phone: [phone]M TYPICAL WETLAND FILL rJ
Environmental Consultants, Inc. Fax: [phone] an_ ,o.ormoe
C Craaecrrw, ssr Campus Quarters, LLC Henderson County NC OF5
From: Chris Frame 912 239-9599 To: Clement Riddle Date: 4/4/2006 Time: 11:31:38 AM Page 2 of 2
P-Q. Box 2283 Savannah, Georgia 31402
phone: [phone] • fax: [phone]
CAMPUS QUARTERS, LLC
April 4, 2006
Mr. K Clement Riddle
Clearwater Environmental Consultants, Inc.
224 South Grove Streety Suite F
Hendersonville, N.C. 28792
RE-- Campus Quarters, LLC
Dear Clement:
This is in regard to our telephone conversation yesterday, regarding authorizing you to
act as agent for the 404 permit application. Therefore, on behalf of me, Christopher
Frame, you are hereby authorized to act as the agent for Campus Quarters, LLC in
Henderson County, NC pertaining to all wetlands permitting matters on the above
refcrenced project.
Should you need any other information or authorization, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
pher K. Frame
Managing Partner
[e-mail]
f
Preliminary Threatened and Endangered Species Assessment
for Campus Quarters .
Henderson County, North Carolina
April 11, 2006
1.0 Introduction
The following report details methods used and an assessment of survey results for a
threatened and endangered (T&E) species survey and habitat assessment for the
Hendersonville Home Systems. The T&E species survey was conducted to determine the
occurrence of or the potential for animal and plant species listed as federally threatened or
endangered to exist on the proposed site. Completion of this survey was directed by and
complies with current state and federal regulations [Federal Endangered Species Act of
1973 (16 USC 1531-1543) and the North Carolina Endangered Species Act (N.C.G.S.
Sect. 113 article 25) and North Carolina Plant Protection and Conservation Act of 1979
(N.C.G.S. Sect. 19b 106:202.12-22).
The referenced site is accessed from College Drive in Henderson County, North Carolina
(Figure 1).
2.0 Methodology
A preliminary protected species survey was conducted in April 2006, on the proposed
Campus Quarters site by C1earWater Environmental Consultants, Inc. to determine potential
for occurrences of animal and plant species listed as endangered or threatened by current
Federal or State regulations.
Correspondence solicited from the USFWS provided existing data concerning the presence
or potential occurrence of threatened or endangered species in Henderson County, North
Carolina. The USFWS lists the following eight federally threatened and endangered species
as occurring or potentially occurring in Henderson County (Appendix A).
Common Name Scientifi c Name Status
Oyster Mussel E ioblasma ca saeformus Endangered
Swam ink Helonias bullata Threatened
Appalachian elktoe Alasmidonata raveneliana Endangered
Small whorled o onia Isotria medeoloides Threatened
bunched arrowhead Sa ittaria fasiculata Endangered
mountain sweet pitcher plant Sarracenia jonesii Endangered
White irisette S' rinchium dichotomion Endangered
bog turtle Clemm s muhlenbur ii Threatened*
I LU Vd1cucu uue w simuanry or appearance with northern bog turtle
The protected species audit consisted of a pedestrian survey by C1earWater Environmental
Consultants staff. During field surveys, site habitats were identified and compared with
r
recognized habitats for each of the eight species potentially occurring on the site. Potential
flora and fauna were identified to the taxonomic unit level necessary to determine if the
observed specimen was a protected species.
3.0 Habitat Classification
During our site visits in January 2005 and April 2006, four habitats: agricultural field,
shrub/scrub wetland, upland hardwood forest, and streambed and bank were identified on
the property. The following is a description of each of the four habitat types identified on
the referenced site and its likelihood to harbor or support listed species.
3.1 Agricultural field
The site contains several agricultural fields. Some of the fields have been
maintained within the past year and contain various common upland field grasses.
Some of the fields do not appear to have been maintained within the past two
years. These areas have become overgrown with multiflora rose (Rosa
multiflora). This habitat is not suitable for any of the listed species.
3.2 Shrub/Scrub Wetland
This habitat occurs in a flat area located in the north central portion of the property
and adjacent to an unnamed tributary to Bat Fork Creek. This wetland appears to be
regularly flooded by Bat Fork Creek. The wetland has been historically altered
through clearing and ditching. The wetland ditch portions of this habitat remain
inundated and contain an obligate wetland plant community. The wetland has been
mowed in the past and is heavily infested with multiflora rose. Additional species
observed include red maple (Acer rubrum) and river birch (Betula nigra) in the
overstory. Plants observed in the shrub layer include mulitflora rose, Chinese privet
(Ligustrum sinense), blackberry (Rubes sp.), and elderberry (Sambucus canadensis).
Herbaceous species observed include N.Y. Ironweed (Vernonia noveboracensis),
soft rush (Juncus effuses), several species of sedges (Carex spp.), jewelweed
(Impatiens capensis), and cattails (Typha latifolia).
3.3 Upland Hardwood Forest
This habitat occurs on the northeastern corner of the site adjacent to College Drive.
Species observed within the overstory of this community include white oak
(Quercus alba), southern red -oak (Quercus falcata), Hickory (Carya tomentosa),
yellow poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), and white pine (Pinus strobus). The
understory and shrub layer contain blackberry, multiflora rose, black cherry (Prunus
serotina), serviceberry (Amelanchier laevis), and American holly (Ilex opaca).
Species observed in the herbaceous layer included Christmas fern (Polystichum
acrostichoides), blackberry (Rubes sp.), and poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans).
This habitat is not suitable for listed species. Therefore, impact to this habitat is not
likely to affect listed species.
3.4 Stream Bed and Bank
This freshwater habitat includes the streambeds and banks of unnamed tributaries to
Bat Fork Creek. These creeks have shallow banks and the bed material is a mixture
of sand, silt, and smaller gravel. Permanently rooted aquatic plants are practically
non-existent in these streams. The tributary banks are dominated by shrubs and
herbs including multiflora rose, elderberry, blackberry, yellow root (Xanthorhiza
simplicissima), jewelweed, cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamomea), and Christmas
fem. Suitable habitat for listed species was not found within this habitat type.
4.0 Listed species and Acknowledged Habitats
The following is a brief description of each listed species included in the survey, its
recognized habitat and comments regarding survey results for that species:
4.1 Mountain sweet pitcher plant, federally listed as an endangered
species is a perennial herb, the mountain sweet pitcher plant grows from 21 to
73 inches tall. Its numerous and erect leaves grow in clusters and are hollow
and trumpet-shaped, forming slender, almost tubular pitchers with a heart-
shaped hood. The pitchers are a waxy dull green with criss-crossing maroon-
purple veins. The hair inside the pitchers' tube is usually bent downward, and
the tubes are often partially filled with liquid and decayed insect parts.
Flowers of the mountain sweet pitcher plant are usually maroon with
recurving petals. The stalks are erect and bear one flower each. Flowering
and fruiting occurs April - June. Restricted to bogs and streamsides on
granite rock faces along the Blue Ridge Divide, this plant's populations are
generally found in level depressions associated with floodplains. A few
populations can be found along the sides of waterfalls on granite rock faces.
Herbs and shrubs usually dominate the bogs where these plants are located,
but there may be a few scattered trees. The bog soils are deep, poorly-drained
combinations of loam, sand, and silt, with a high organic matter content and a
medium to highly acidic composition. Potentially suitable habitat is not
present at the wetland area for mountain sweet pitcher plant (Sarracenia
jonesii), therefore impacts to this species are unlikely.
4.2 Bunched arrowhead, federally listed as an endangered species is an
emersed aquatic perennial herb, which grows 6 to 13 inches in height. Its
spatulate-shaped leaves reach 3 decimeters (12 inches long) and 2 centimeters
(three-fourths of an inch) wide, and stem from the base of the plant. The
flowering stalk is erect, with upper flowers male and lower flowers female.
Male flowers have three reflexed sepals, three white petals, and numerous
stamens with pubescent, dilated filaments. Female flowers have three
spreading or reflexed sepals, three white petals, and numerous separate
carpels. The stalks of the lowest whorl of flowers ascend in fait, and the
fruiting head is of numerous achenes. Flowering and fruiting occurs from May
to July. Bunched arrowhead grows in seepage areas, which have little or no
net flow but are not stagnant. The soil in the seepages can be characterized as
sandy loams overtopped by a muck layer ranging in depth from 25 to 60
centimeters. Shaded sites have larger, more vigorous plants than open areas.
Potentially, suitable habitat for this species is found within inundated portions
of the wetland area however this plant was not observed during the survey. In
addition, the high degree of manmade disturbance on the site makes this
species occurrence unlikely; therefore impacts to this species are unlikely.
4.3 Appalachian elktoe, federally listed as an endangered species has a
thin, but not fragile, kidney-shaped shell, reaching up to about 3.2 inches in
length, 1.4 inches in height, and 1 inch in width (Clarke 1981). Juveniles
generally have a yellowish-brown periostracum (outer shell surface) while the
periostracum of the adults is usually dark brown to greenish-black in color.
Although rays are prominent on some shells, particularly in the posterior
portion of the shell, many individuals have only obscure greenish rays. The
shell nacre (inside shell surface) is shiny, often white to bluish-white,
changing to a salmon, pinkish, or brownish color in the central and beak
cavity portions of the shell; some specimens may be marked with irregular
brownish blotches (adapted from Clarke 1981). Only two populations of the
species are known to survive. The healthiest of these populations exists in the
main stem of the Little Tennessee River between Emory Lake at Franklin,
Macon County, North Carolina, and Fontana Reservoir in Swain County,
North Carolina. The second population occurs in the Nolichucky River
system. The Appalachian elktoe has been reported from relatively shallow,
medium-sized creeks and rivers with cool, well-oxygenated, moderate- to fast-
flowing water. It has been observed in gravelly substrates often mixed with
cobble and boulders, in cracks in bedrock, and occasionally in relatively silt-
free, coarse, sandy substrates (Department of the Interior 1994). Stream type
and substrates observed were not suitable for this species, therefore impacts to
this species are unlikely.
4.4 Small-whorled pogonia, federally listed as an endangered species
occurs on upland sites in mixed-deciduous or mixed-deciduous/coniferous
forest that are generally in second or third growth successional stages.
Characteristics common to most sites include sparse to moderate ground cover
in the species' microhabitat, a relatively open understory canopy, and
proximity to features that create long persisting breaks in the forest canopy.
Soils at most sites are highly acidic and nutrient poor, with moderately high
soil moisture values. Light availability could be a limiting factor for this
species. The stem is smooth, hollow pale green and 3.7-9.8 inches tall with a
single whorl of 5 to 6 light green elliptical leaves 3 inches long and 1.6 inches
wide. A flower is borne at the top of the stem. It is distinguished from the
similar L verticillata by the latter's purplish stem and long, dark sepals.
Suitable habit for this species was not observed onsite. It is unlikely that
development of this site will have an adverse impact on small-whorled
pogonia.
4.5 Swamp pink, federally listed as a threatened species is found in
wetlands that are saturated but not flooded. This would include southern
Appalachian bogs and swamps. Swamp pink would also be found in Atlantic
white cedar swamps and swampy forests bordering small streams, boggy
meadows and spring seepage areas. This species is commonly associated with
some evergreens, including white cedar, pitch pine, American larch, and black
spruce. It can be distinguished by its basal rosette of light green, lance-shaped
and parallel-veined leaves with a hollow-stemmed flower stalk that can grow
8-35 inches during flowering and up to 5 feet during seed maturation.
Flowering occurs March through May and flowers are clustered (30-50) at the
tip of the stem, in a bottlebrush shape. During this survey no specimens of
swamp pink or typically associated evergreens were observed in the wetland
areas. It is unlikely that development of this site will impact this species.
4.6 The Oyster mussel is a small (maximum about 70 millimeters or 2.1
inches) freshwater mussel (Neves 1991). Its periostracum (outer shell surface)
has a dull to sub-shiny yellowish to green colored shell with numerous narrow
dark green rays. The oyster mussel inhabits small to medium rivers (Dennis
1985) in areas with coarse sand to boulder substratum (rarely in mud) and
moderate to swift currents (Gordon 1991). It is sometimes found associated
with water-willow (Justicia americana) beds (Gordon and Layzer 1989) and
in pockets of gravel between bedrock ledges in areas of swift current (Neves
1991). The USFWS has no current records of the species in North Carolina; it
was last collected in North Carolina in 1913 (Ortmann 1918). The small
unnamed tributaries are not suitable habitat for the oyster mussel.
4.7 White Irisette, federally listed as an endangered species is found in rich,
basic soils probably weathered from amphibolite, in clearings and the edges of
upland woods where the canopy is thin and often where downslope runoff has
removed much of the deep litter layer ordinarily present on these sites. Flowering
occurs from late May to July. White Irisette grows in a dichotomously-branching
pattern. 4-8 inches tall; basal leaves are pale bluish-green: tiny white flowers (.3
inch) with reflexed petals in a cluster of 4-6 at the ends of winged stems; fruit is
round w/3-6 seeds. White flowers and dichotomous branching pattern distinguish
it from similar species. Suitable habitat for this species was not observed,
therefore impacts to this species during development is unlikely.
4.8 Bog turtle, federally listed as a threatened species by similarity of
appearance with the northern bog turtle. Bog turtles are easily distinguished from
other turtles by the large, conspicuous bright orange, yellow or red blotch found
on each side of the head. Adult bog turtle shells are 3 to 4-1/2 inches in length and
range in color from light brown to ebony. Habitat would include sunlit marshy
meadows, spring seepages, wet cow pastures, and bogs. The preference would be
narrow, shallow, slow-moving rivulets. The southern population of the bog turtle,
ranging from southern Virginia to northern Georgia, is also protected with a
threatened designation because its physical appearance is similar to the northern
population. The southern bog turtle population is separated from the northern
population by approximately 250 miles. However, individual bog turtles in the
southern population closely resemble individuals in the northern bog turtle
population, causing difficulty in enforcing prohibitions protecting the northern
population. Therefore, the Service is designating the southern population as
"threatened (similarity of appearance)." This designation prohibits collecting
individual turtles from this population and bans interstate and international
commercial trade. As per USFWS guidance, It has no effect on land management
activities of private landowners in southern states where the bog turtle lives. No
suitable habitats were found in the project area for this species; therefore impacts
to this species are unlikely.
Findings
Three habitats found on site, agricultural field, upland hardwood forest, and
stream bed and bank, do not match acknowledged suitable habitat for any of the
listed species described above. Shrub/scrub wetland does provide suitable habitat
for bunched arrowhead, however this species was not observed during the survey.
In addition the high degree of manmade disturbance on-site, make the occurrence of
this species unlikely.
5.0 Conclusion
During completion of threatened and endangered species habitat assessments for the
Campus Quarters site, no listed species were observed. Based upon the available habitat, it
is the opinion of C1earWater Environmental Consultants, Inc. that federally and state
protected species are not likely to be affected from this project. As such, development of
the proposed area is not likely to cause and adverse impact to any threatened or endangered
species or potential habitat for threatened and endangered species.
Although no threatened and endangered species were identified during this survey,
because of the transitory nature of some of the listed threatened and endangered species
and the particular flower/fruiting periods of some plants, it is possible that endangered
species populations and locations may change over time. Therefore, any potential
findings at a later date should be fully investigated and coordinated with appropriate
agencies to prevent potential adverse impacts.
APPENDIX A
Henderson County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern, ... Page 1 of 2
Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of
Concern, and Candidate Species,
Henderson County, North Carolina
Updated: 03-29-2006
Common Name
Vertebrate:
Bog turtle
Eastern small-footed bat
Green salamander
Hellbender
Mountain blotched chub
Pygmy salamander
Southern Appalachian eastern
woodrat
Yellow-bellied sapsucker
(Southern Appalachian
population)
Invertebrate:
Appalachian elktoe
Diana fritillary (butterfly)
French Broad crayfish
Oyster mussel
Tennessee heelsplitter
Vascular Plant:
Blue Ridge Ragwort
Bog asphodel
Bunched arrowhead
Butternut
Scientific name
Federal Record Status
Status
Clemmys muhlenbergii T (S/A)
Myotis leibii FSC
Aneides aeneus FSC
Cryptobranchus alleganiensis FSC
Erimystax insignis eristigma FSC
Desmognathus wrighti FSC
Neotoma floridana haematoreia FSC
Sphyrapicus varius
appalachiensis
Alasmidonta raveneliana
Speyeria diana
Cambarus reburrus
Epioblasma capsaeformis
Lasmigona holstonia
Packera millefolium
Narthecium americanum
Sagittaria fasciculata
Juglans cinerea
FSC
Current
Current
Current
Current
Obscure
Current
Current
Current
E Current
FSC Current
FSC Obscure
E Historic and Obscure
FSC Current
FSC Historic
C Historic_
E Current
FSC Current
http://nc-es.fws.gov/es/cntylist/henderson.htnil 411119.006
Henderson County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern, ... Page 2 of 2
Fort Mountain sedge
Fraser's loosestrife
French Broad heartleaf
Gray's lily
Large-flowered barbara's-
buttons
Mountain catchfly
Mountain heartleaf
Mountain sweet pitcherplant
New Jersey rush
Small whorled pogonia
Small-leaved meadow-rue
Swamp pink
Sweet pinesap
White fiingless orchid
White irisette
Nonvascular plant:
Carex communis var. FSC Current
amplisquama
. Lysimachia fraseri FSC Obscure
Hexastylis rhombiformis FSC Current
Lilium grayi FSC Historic
Marshallia grandiflora FSC Historic
Silene ovata FSC Current
Hexastylis contracta FSC Current
Sarracenia rubra ssp. jonesii E Current
Juncus caesariensis FSC Current
Isotria medeoloides T Current
Thalictrum macrostylum FSC Historic
Helonias bullata T Current
Monotropsis odorata FSC Obscure
Platanthera integrilabia C Historic
Sisyrinchium dichotomum E Current
Definitions of Federal Status Codes:
E = endangered. A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
T = threatened. A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range."
P = proposed. A taxon proposed for official listing as endangered or threatened.
C = candidate. A taxon under consideration for official listing for which there is sufficient information
to support listing. (Formerly "C1" candidate species.)
FSC = federal species of concern. A species under consideration for listing, for which there is
insufficient information to support listing at this time. These species may or may not be listed in the
future, and many of these species were formerly recognized as "C2" candidate species.
T(S/A) = threatened due to similarity of appearance. A species that is threatened due to similarity of
appearance with other rare species and is listed for its protection. These species are not biologically
endangered or threatened and are not subject to Section 7 consultation.
EXP = experimental population. A taxon listed as experimental (either essential or nonessential).
Experimental, nonessential populations of endangered species (e.g., red wolf) are treated as threatened
species on public land, for consultation purposes, and as species proposed for listing on private land.
Definitions of "Record Status" qualifiers:
Current - the species has been observed in the county within the last 50 years.
Historic - the species was last observed in the county more than 50 years ago.
Obscure - the date and/or location of observation is uncertain.
Incidental/migrant - the species was observed outside of its normal range or habitat.
Probable/potential - the species is considered likely to occur in this county based on the proximity of
known records (in adjacent counties), the presence of potentially suitable habitat, or both.
http://nc-es.fws.gov/es/cntylistihenderson.html 4/11/2006
NGNHP Quad Search
Pagel of 2
NC NHP Quad Search Results
New Search
Returned Elements: 48 using: HENDERSONVILLE
[Invertebrate Animal 1] [Natural C ommunity 11] [Nonvascular Plant 2] [Vascular Plant 31] [Vertebrate An imal 3]
Major Group Scientific Name Common Name State Federal State Global Quad - Status Map -
Status Statu s Rank Rank Habitat
Invertebrate Macdunnoa brunnea
Animal A Mayfly SR None S2 G3G4 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Natural
Community Acidic cove forest None None None S5 G5 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Natural
Community Canada hemlock forest None None None S5 G5 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Natural
Community Chestnut oak forest None None None S5 G5 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Natural
Community Low elevation granitic dome None None None S7 G2 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Natural
Community Montane alluvial forest None None None S1 G2? Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Natural
Community Montane oak-hickory forest None None None S5 G5 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Natural Piedmont/mountain

Community semipermanent None None None S4 G5 Hendersonville- Link
impoundment Current -
Natural
Community Piedmontlmountainswamp None
forest None None S1S2 G2. Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Natural
Community Rich cove forest None None None S4 G4 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Natural
Community Southern appalachian bog
(southern subtype) None None None SiS2 G1G2T1T2 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Natural
Community Swamp forest-bog complex None
(typic subtype) None None S3 G2G3T2 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Nonvascular Pannaria conoplea
Plant Mealy-rimmed Shingle SR
-D None
S1
G3G4 Hendersonville-
Lichen Current Link

Plant onvascular Sphagnum capillifolium
N
Northern Peatmoss
SR-P None
S1
G5
Hendersonville-
Link
Historic -
Vascular
Plant Adiumia fungosa Climbing Fumitory SR-P None S2 G4 Hendersonville-
Link
Obscure
Vascular
Plant Arethusa bulbosa Bog Rose E None S1 G4 Hendersonville-
Link
Historic
Vascular
Plant Campanula aparinoldes Marsh Bellflower SR-P None S2 G5 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Vascular
Plant Carex barrattii Barratt's Sedge E None SH G4 Hendersonville-
Link
Historic
Vascular
Plant Carex pedunculata Longstalk Sedge SR-P None S2 G5 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Vascular
Plant Carex utriculata Beaked Sedge SR-P None S1 G5 Hendersonville-
Link
Historic
Vascular
Plant Carex verrucosa Warty Sedge SR-P None S2 G3G4 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Vascular
Plant Celastrus scandens American Bittersweet SR-P None S2? G5 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Vascular
Plant Epilobium ciliatum Purpleleaf Willowherb SR-P None S2 G5 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Vascular
Plant Eu atorium
p godfreyanum Godfrey's
Thorou
hwort
SR-P None
S2
G4 Hendersonville-
Link
g Historic
Vascular
Plant Hasteola suaveolens Sweet Indian-plantain SR-T None SH G3 Hendersonville
Link
Historic
Vascular
Plant Helenium brevifolium Littleleaf Sneezeweed E None S2 G3G4 Hendersonville-
Link
Historic
http://207.4.179.3 8/nhp/quad.php
4/11/2006
NC•NHP Quad Search
Page 2 of 2
Vascular
Plant Helonias bullata Swamp Pink T-SC T S2 G3 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Vascular
Plant Hexastylis contracta Mountain Heartleaf E FSC S1 G3 Hendersonville-
Link
Current -
Vascular
Plant Hexastylis rhombiformis French Broad SR-L FSC S2 G2 Hendersonville-
Link
Heartleaf Current
Vascular Isotria medeoloides Small Whorled E T S2 G2 Hendersonville-

Plant
Pogonia
Current Link
-
Vascular Juncus caesariensis Rough Rush (=new E FSC S1 G2 Hendersonville-
Plant Jersey Rush) Current Link
Vascular
Plant Lilium canadense ssp.
editorum Red Canada Lily SR-P None S1 G5T4 Hendersonville-
Link
Obscure -
Vascular
Plant Lonicera (lava Yellow Honeysuckle SR-P None S2 G5? Hendersonville-
Link
Historic -
Vascular
Plant Magnolia macrophylla Bigleaf Magnolia SR-P None S2 G5 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Vascular
Plant Marshallia grandiflora Large-flowered
'
SR-T
FSC
SH
G2 Hendersonville- Li
k
Barbara
s-buttons Historic n
-
Vascular
Plant Myrica gale Sweet Gale E None Si G5 Hendersonville-
Link
Current -

Plant
Vascular
Plant Narthecium americanum Bog Asphodel E C SX G2 Hendersonville-

Link
Historic
Vascular
Plant Packera millefolium Divided-leaf Ragwort T FSC S2 G2 Hendersonville-
Link
Historic
Vascular
Plant Platanthera integrilabia White Fringeless E C SX G2G3 Hendersonville-
Li
k
Orchid Historic n
Vascular
Plant Robinia hispida var. kelseyi Kelsey's Locust SR-O None S1 G4T1 Hendersonville-
Link
Historic
Vascular
Plant Sagittaria fasciculata Bunched Arrowhead E E S1 G1 Hendersonville
Link
Current
Vascular Sarracenia 'onesii Mountain Sweet E -SC
-SC E S1 G3T1 Li
k
Pitcher Plant Current n
Vascular
Plant Stachys eplingi! Epling's Hedge-nettle SR-T None SH G5 Hendersonville-
Link
Historic
Vascular
Plant Thermo sis fraxinifol/a
p Ash-leaved Golden-
SR-T
None
S2?
G3? Hendersonville-

Li
k
banner Historic n
Vascular
Plant Thermopsis mollis Appalachian Golden- SR-P None S2 G3G4 Hendersonville
Li
k
banner Historic n
Vertebrate
Animal Crotalus horridus Timber Rattlesnake SC None S3 G4 Hendersonville-
Link
Historic
Vertebrate
Animal
G/yptemys muhlenbergii
Bog Turtle
T
T(S/A)
S2
G3 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
Vertebrate
Animal Mustela nivalis Least Weasel SR None S2 G5 Hendersonville-
Link
Current
NC NHP database updated: March, 2006.
Search performed on Tuesday, 11 April 2006 @ 09:55:35 EDST
Explanation of Codes
http://207.4.179.38/nhp/quad.php 4/11/2006
e
82° 26' 00" W WGS84 8202500" lid
z
O
ao
T-i
0
Ln
m
j e • qp•L_??..V • . j
rt .
n , • • 2180-•?
1
• t' - f ? ' Corr riu n.
71
A?w
?' • . + *\; ' tit ? - f-. ', ??? K •
•! i O.
A?` . -.•, : ' :?:' ,. - PROJECT SITE
Athl'
.? 0fkefAkt
ra' a ar
!1 w ?'' • c .: v``? a H n sin ?? .
4
17
•. r
L- -A 0
•+ + • r
in-
` • • ?,
-x V
%
z
O
OD
T-i
0
l'1
2026'00" 1 WGS84 82025'00" W
MN TN k 5 1 MILE.
6° 1000 FEET 0 Sao 1000 METERS
Map created with TOPO!® ©2003 National Geographic (www.natiomlgeographic.com/topo)
CLEARWATER
29-Acre Tract Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Henderson County, N.C. 224 South Grove Street, Suite F USGS Topographic Map
Hendersonville, NC 28792 Figure 2
828-698-9800
f ,-
Yi L 3p
t a r
s ,k k Al F .
¢ -
46 t
- ?? .dam c
N
N
C
TW
CY)
VJ
vl-
sw
C
S $ N

ccdd N
121,

C o0
N
a 0 fl

x
WN
U
z
4.
a U
?. o
U ?
a?
x