20060306 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20060411

1852 .
TOWN OF TROY
June 20, 2006
Ian McMillian
DWQ
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Ian,
C) Lv - D3ola V'2,
ROY MANESS
MAYOR
JAMES HURLEY
MAYOR PRO- TEM
COMMISSIONERS:
BRUCE HAMILTON
SAM JOHNSON
WALLACEJONES
CHRIS WATKINS
GREG ZEPHIR
TOWN MANAGER
CATHY M. MANESS
TOWN CLERK
Please find enclosed a property map for The Troy Business Center identifying all
properties with the owners. Also enclosed is a detailed accounting for impervious areas on all
built out properties.
The total impervious areas for the entire property came to 28%. I did not play any games
to get this number. Ken Averitte from the Fayetteville Region came to Troy at my request on
06/19/06 and we drove out to the business center and inspected all the sites. There is a 3.66 acre
tract north of Industrial Drive between the street and our sewer easement that Troy is reserving
as dedicated area for the wet weather creek running through that section of the property.
Surveying of the delineated wetlands should be completed by 06/23/06. Brad Shaffer
will be here on the 291h to confirm the entire site wetlands
Troy will incorporate in the existing Business Center Covenants and Restrictions,
verbiage that makes each landowner responsible for storm water management and storm water
treatment of the site storm water prior to leaving their property. The storm water provision will
also state that the storm water management practices and the storm water treatment methods
shall be approved by all the appropriate state agencies prior to commencement of any operations
by the property owner.
When you have looked everything over, please give me a call and tell me how me need to
proceed.
, Sincerely
W b
(I I l%i?l ?jw??
JUN 2 1 2006 Gray Walls
F ?:?pF:Q ntIALI Y Public Works Dir./Engineer
315 NORTH MAIN STREET TROY, NC 27371
PHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]
ww Aroy.nc.us
r
Y
r
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 14, 2006
Town of Troy
315 North Main Street
Troy, NC 27371
Subject Property
Troy Business Center Access Road
Ut to Warner Creek [030715, 13-85-30-2, C]
DWQ Project # 06-0306, Ver. 2
Montgomery County
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Sir or Madam:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
within or otherwise impact 86 linear feet of perennial stream (33 linear feet of new impact and 53 feet of
impact to replace an existing culvert) the purpose of providing access to the proposed Troy Business
Center at the subject property, as described within your application dated February 22, 2006 and received
by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on February 24, 2006, with more information received on
May 18, 2006, May 21, 2006, July 6, 2006, July 13, 2006 and July 18, 2006. After reviewing your
application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification
Number(s) 3404 (GC3404). The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) N W 14 when
issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). In addition, you should obtain or otherwise
comply with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project
including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, Non-discharge, and water supply
regulations. Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to
waters as depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of
wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A
NCAC 2H .0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:
Amount Approved Units Plan Location or Reference
Stream - perennial 33 linear feet PCN page 8 of 12
401 Oversight / Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: him //h2o enr state nc us/newetlands
N Vi na
a ura,1/
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50%Recycled/10%Post Consumer Paper
Town of Troy.
Page 2 of 3
July 14, 2006
2. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in
accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
3. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond
the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction
activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion
control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality
standards, statutes, or rules occur.
4. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures Within Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum
extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters
is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date
that the Division of Land Resources has released the project.
5. Stormwater Requirement For Pockets of High Density
Under Condition No. 4 of GC 3404, the Division can require stormwater management plans for
developments that have, or are anticipated to have, 30 percent or greater of impervious surface
area. Furthermore, it is the Division's policy that areas of concentrated development within a
project must treat stormwater runoff. Stormwater management shall be designed to remove 85%
TSS according to the latest version of DWQ's Stormwater Best Management Practices manual at
a minimum. Additionally, in watersheds that are classified as nutrient sensitive waters (NSW),
the Division shall require that extended detention wetlands, bio-retention areas, and ponds
followed by forested filter strips (designed according to the latest version of DWQ's Stormwater
Best Management Practices Manual) be constructed as part of the stormwater management plan.
Therefore, if any of the parcels within the Town of Troy Business Center exceed the 30 percent
impervious surface area threshold, the developer of this parcel(s) must submit a stormwater
management plan as per the guidelines above. Additionally, in accordance with the June 20,
2006 letter from the Town of Troy, on-site stormwater management shall be required for
stormwater from all parcels that exceed the 30 percent impervious surface area threshold per
Town of Troy
t! Page 3 of 3
July 14, 2006
Condition No. 4 of GC 3404, and the Town of Troy has the responsibility to notify landowners
and developers of these tracts with respect to this requirement.
7. Culvert Installation
Culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream profiles
are not altered. Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section dimensions, pattern, and
longitudinal profile) must be maintained above and below locations of each culvert. Culverts shall
be designed and installed to allow for aquatic life movement as well as to prevent head cutting of the
streams. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched, the appropriate stream grade shall be re-
established or, if the pipes installed in a perched manner, the pipes shall be removed and re-installed
correctly.
Culvert(s) shall not be installed in such a manner that will cause aggradation or erosion of the stream
up or down stream of the culvert(s). Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section
dimensions, pattern and longitudinal profile) shall be maintained above and below locations of each
culvert.
Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands must be placed below the
elevation of the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches, and 20
percent of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches, to allow low flow
passage of water and aquatic life. Design and placement of culverts and other structures including
temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may result in
disequilibrium of wetlands or streambeds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and down stream of the
above structures. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the equilibrium shall be
maintained if requested in writing by DWQ.
The establishment of native, woody vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques
must be used where practicable instead of rip rap or other bank hardening methods. If riprap is
necessary, it shall not be placed in the stream bed, unless specifically approved by the Division of
Water Quality.
Installation of culverts in wetlands must ensure continuity of water movement and be designed to
adequately accommodate high water or flood conditions.
Upon completion of the project, the Applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" form to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the 401 Certification has been
completed. The responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the 401/Wetlands
Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality upon completion of the project. Please send photographs
upstream and downstream of each culvert site to document correct installation along with the
Certificate of Completion form.
8. Wetland and Right-of-Way Preservation
The Town of Troy has agreed to place all onsite wetlands (3.185 acres) and the right-of way (3.66
acres which includes 0.872 acres within the 3.185 acres of total onsite wetlands) shown on the
site plan in a conservation easement with deed restrictions. The conservation easement with deed
restrictions must be maintained in perpetuity such that-Protection is provided to all streams and
wetland areas proposed for preservation as depicted on the July 14, 2006 site plan titled "Troy
Business Center" and subtitled "Troy Business Center Site Plan and Wetland Delineation",
Drawing No. 1, Sheet I of 1.
Town of Troy
Page 4 of 3
July 14, 2006
The Town of Troy must establish the deed restrictions or a conservation easements, and a
copy-must be provided to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Central Office
within 90 days of issuance of this Certification. These streams and wetland-must-remain in a
Conservation Easement or under a protective deed restriction. The Town of Troy must maintain
the Conservation Easement or deed restriction as long as it owns the property and transfer the
Conservation Easement or deed restriction and its requirements to any future owners, trustees,
executors or other agents, including any Home Owners Association within the subject tract.
9. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable
Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached
certificate of completion to the 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit, North Carolina
Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or
stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of
the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved
buffer impacts) shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is
subject to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly or Ian McMillan in the Central Office in
Raleigh at 919-733-1786 or Eric Kulz at 919-791-4200.
AWK/Um
Enclosures: GC3404
Certificate of Completion
cc: USACE Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Ken Averitte, DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office
DLR Fayetteville Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Si cerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Filename: 060306 Ver2TroyB usClrAccessRd(Montgomery)40l
ROY MANESS
MAYOR
1
TOWN OF TROY
Y)r' X
1852 July 17, 2006

Mr. Ian McMillian
DWQ
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Mr. McMillian,
JAMES HURLEY
MAYOR PRO- TEM
COMMISSIONERS:
BRUCE HAMILTON
SAM JOHNSON
WALLACEJONES
CHRIS WATKINS
GREG ZEPHIR
TOWN MANAGER
CATHY M. MANESS
TOWN CLERK
Per our discussion on Friday, please find enclosed an updated plat of the
"Troy Business Center.
If there are any questions or if further information is needed please contact
me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Gray VbaIIS
Public Works Director/Engineer
EGW/av An
Enclosure
P
O??P?
yao
315 NORTH MAIN STREET TROY, NC 27371
PHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]
wwwAroy.nems
THE TOM OF TROY WILL COVENANT WITH THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
PTO MAINTAIN IN ITS NATURAL STATE, ANY AND ALL DELINEATED WETLANDS AS
P
PU,,SHOWM ON THIS DRAWING. TROY FURTHER PLEDGES TO RETAIN
P
PU,,PERPETUAL OWMER SHIP OF SAID WETLANDS WITH NO REMEDY AVA
TOTAL ACTUAL&ASSUMED IMPERVIOUS ACRES
P
PDtlvew yla Dranlh - 21A
PlnEustdal DEve -228A
PEIIle Footle 4.22A
PK R. D.Mh -1.14A
PUM.me Cualem M,IN i*. - .38A
PUwfiame
TROY BI
Updated Plat of the
TROY BUSINESS CENTER SITE

7
. 1852 .
TOWN OF TROY
Lan McMillan
Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Dear Mr. McMillian:
s; ,)J
?L

JUL 1. ; 2006
DENR VV I"1v
Please find enclosed a map of the Town of Troy's Business Center Water
Main Layout.
Sincerely,

Sherry Robinson
Administrative Assistant
Enclosure
ROY MANESS
MAYOR
JAMES HURLEY
MAYOR PRO-TrM
COMMISSIONERS:
13RUCE HAMILTON
SAM JOHNSON
WALLACEJONES
CHRIS WATKINS
GREG ZEPHIR
TOWN MANAGER
CATHY M. MANE:SS
TOWN CLERK
315 NORTH MAIN STREET TROY, NC 27371
PHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]
wwwAroymc.us
r--?, , ? ?? > ; ?,
'?? ?z•••••??.??••I??u'u`r••••?CI"'
??1C__L?/ ?;_
? ???
Q?
??`?? ?0?`3 ?.?1
DWQ# O 4a 3 0 L Date 42/10 Who Review
Plan Detail Incomplete "
Lthesite m ? Please provide a location map fo r the project. 0 ar y
? Please show all stream impacts including all fill slo and bank stabiwza n the site plan. 14 Please show all wetland impacts including fill slop. ``
? Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan.
F-1 Please indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on the site plan. V 0'/`f / -5;'l
? Please indicate the location of the protected buffers as overlays on the site plan.
Please locate all isolated or non-isolated wetlands, streams and other waters of the State as overlays on the site plan.
? Please locate any planned sewer lines on the site plan. ?T
? Please provide the location of any proposed stotmwater management practices as required by GC
? Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please specify the percent of project imperviousness area based on the estimated built-out conditions.
? Please indicate all stormwatei curtails on the site phut. -
? Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan.
? Please indicate whether or not the proposed impacts already been conducted. -
Avoidance. and/or Minimization Not Provided
G,??oro?? ??ly
._ DD
? The labeled as on the plans does not appear to be necessary. Please eliminate the or provide additional
infornetion as to why it is necessary for this project.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as
. Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts.
can be moved or reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the
?. This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as
. Please revise the plans to minimize the impacts.
can be moved or reconfigured to minimize the impacts to the
? The stormwater discharges at the location on the plans labeled will not provide diffuse flow through the buffer because
. Please revise the plans and provide calculations to show that diffuse flow will be achieved through the entire buffer. If it
is not possible to achieve diffuse flow through the entire buffer then it may be necessary to provide stormwater management
practices that remove nutrients before the stormwater can be discharged through the buffer.
Other
? The application fee was insufficient because over 150 feet of stream and/or over I acre of wetland' impacts were requested. Please
provide $ 'Ibis additional fee must be received before your application can be reviewed.
? ?lease complete Section(s) on the application. - -
? Please provide a signed copy of the application.
? Please provide _ copies of the application, _ copies of the site plans and other supporting information.
? Please submit electronic CAD files showing _ , via email to [e-mail] and CD:
Mitigation
? of compensatory mitigation is required for this project. Please provide a compensatory mitigation plan. The
plan must conform to the requirements in 15 A NCAC 2H .0500 and must be appropriate to the type of impacts proposed.
? Please indicate which 404 Permit the USACE would use to authorize this project.
FER > .. D,l
Office Use Only: "TIA,Yas wArEti Fora, Version May 2002
AND STORMWgrER BRANCH it. n n E7 0 3 O (7
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4 I1 payment into the North Carolina Wet! ands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
±.; rtion of impacts (verify a.ail0hil_ity with NCWRP prior t:; m%mittW of `1` ..r.: Jete:-
%'.ro VIII and check here: ?
If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Myrick Construction Company, Inc.
Mailing Address: PO Box 728, Biscoe, NC 27209
Telephone Number: 910-428-2106 Fax Number: 910-428-9645
E-mail Address: triamyrick(i?myricke.com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If fall-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: KR Drenth Company _?.
2. T.I.P. Project Number nr State Prgjcct Number (NCDOT Only)
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 752700282695
4. Location
County: Montgomery Nearest Town: Troy
Subdivision name (include phaseilot number): Troy Industrial Park
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Follow Hwy 24/27 West out of
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): N35°0'8", W79°5'50""
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 4 Acres
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Warner Creek
8. River Basin: Yadkin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at htty://h2o.enr.state.uc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Rolling Terrain, Partially Wooded, Commercial and
Industrial Properties on all sides. Land Use is Commercial/Industrial
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Replacement of Existing 48" CW with 48" RCP. The new 48" RCP will be lengthened
to extend approximately 33' further west along the centerline of the existing stream.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the work is to construct an
improved industrial park access road to have flatter grades for large vehicular access.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation i wb(iv applicable) If this is aNCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.O. project, along with
construction schedules.
Not aware of any prior permits.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The project will impact an
additional 33 linear feet of perennial stream upstream of the existine culvert by the
placement of a new 48: RCP culvert in the streambed.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below: No Impacts to Wetlands
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts, Impacts include, but are not limited lo: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplam maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at lutp.LA mUJcnt'11.eov.
*91 List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be aupacted (e.g, freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: <0.10
Total area of wetland impact proposed: No Impact Excepting the Streambed
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
leasespecify)
I New Culvert 33 UT to Warner Creek 1' P
2 Replace CMP 53 UT to Warner Creek I' P

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1.800.358-9616, or online at
amw.usas.eov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., n\cn-.topozone.com,
cowNr.mapnuesteom, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 861inear feet
Page 8 of 12
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below: NOT APPLICABLE
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name Waterbody

(if applicable) ) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

w id - -
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated or any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all VtO :apply! ? uplands D strc un f.7 xedands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NOT APPLICABLE
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The impacts to the stream will be minimal (apuroximately 33 linear feet of additional
culvert will be installed.) The total stream crossing (existing to be replaced and Proposed
NC Division of Land Ouality will be installed and maintained.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
Page 9 of 12
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h'o.enr.state.ne.us/iicwetlar,ds/stnngide.litml.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://li2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the.applicant'.s (or agent's) _responsibility to determine, delineate and map.all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone' Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
• Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from new bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 1 I of 12
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Rvictina Arrece Rnad Racement - 0.45 Freres. Imnervious acreaEe =0.03 Acres
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, ur,wailable capacit<, of the subject fae:aity. .
Sewer will be discharged into the Municipal Sewerage System
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIS'. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Page 12 of 12
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
fi't''!' it I. :!V '"•V i4. IL\:..f t_.. , i 11I ri,l ?`rl,??y!/ r/•. . { r )-_'?? ?.ir+?r,R, p??• ?;: ,F ,+ 1? '.4 hl
I?X+_. t -_ q4. 11 1? ?fj r/ __ ? .? )l ` a(? 1 ,? J ?es?/ •Z a ?: ?' ?r
y \ l
t"n i " rt I 1 t
FIT
Y
?isM'
' 1 1•f ?Yr I .;( \b Ilt yJ. ?17i
Voltage
N .? .. "?..{ / , -,F...•.1 r,e?!.>..;.. a . \?? ' a,
y I ?, r( 1. r I ?l?F ° est ?il l ?1 ?? ?? " 11 V S ;
°'i, - ,I ... 1 ., ?' 343\ ?•:?j+ /\ - .' 1'
jk)Ck
J „
1 Z-141
i ?? `'? V1 ?? ?.< / f sl c 1. 1 li ?ah P fff
Akk
" ' ? I `j - `'-. ?,?' "j1?- C?,? . `'`' \ rh _ li, 'h `? I 4>•1 trukC . I .{'?,?,:
l `? + rl !rA r? 1 ?? Y ,vi? ?`.? 5 e e+
1't
U WI A? R R?
befdo
A ( , 4
ell
' ,, -•,.N .J'? 5(.Y; ?'', •? __.. ? ?fi. •l?i ,,... ?? ,,..J?? ?, a , ? ?•?1 r'?1 `t ?, l•' ! II.. `??y?,?
??,..?r ii -? ` ;1 t:.??.i??,.. ,r?R'?t, ??'3'.`?.1?(?.. ?. q' _,? I l?tl`,
C.jf
Plolwit 0,
' it V v
Air ?!A?w
? ?? 2000
I
Rocky Creek From N.C. Hwy. 27 to C;HQW 08/01/90 Yadkin 13-25-30-(0.5)
Little River
Smith Branch From source to Rocky C 09/01/74 Yadkin 13-25-30-1
Creek
Warner Creek From source to Rocky C 09/01/74 Yadkin 13-25-30-2
Creek
Duck Lake Entire lake and .. 09/01/74 Yadkin 13-25-30-2-1
connecting stream tc
Warner Creek
Toms Branch From source to Rocky C 09/01/74 Yadkin 13-25-30-3
Creek
Hawkins Branch From source to Rocky C 09/01/74 Yadkin 13-25-30-4
Creek
Little Rocky From source to Rocky C 09/01/74 Yadkin 13-25-30-5
Creek Creek
Iron Hill From source to Little C 09/01/74 Yadkin 13-25-30-5-1
Branch (Hill Rocky Creek
Branch)
Thickety Creek From source to Little C 09/01/74 Yadkin 13-25-31
River
Cedar Branch From source to Th:_xety C 09/01/74 Yadkin 13-25-31-1
Creek
Lick Branch From source to Thickety C 09/01/74 Yadkin 13-25-31-2
Creek
Little Creek From source to Thickety C 09/01/74 Yadkin 13-25-31-3
Creek
Aleks Branch From source to Thickety C 09/01/74 Yadkin 13-25-31-4
Creek
Disons Creek From source to Little C 09/01/74 Yadkin 13-25-32
River
Cedar Branch From source to Disons C 09/01/74 Yadkin 13-25-32-1
Creek
TRITECI+
Tritech Civil Environmental, PC
W A I 1 11 & WAS I I WA11=,1? I N(;INI I H")
401 Commerce Place • Asheboro. North Carolina 27203 • [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Post Office Box 4127 • Asheboro, North Carolina 27204 • [phone]
May 17, 2006
NC Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality 401 Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Attention: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
o ?c??od?D
MAY 1 8 2006
QUAUrf
*T VO" li
Subject: Troy Business Center Access Road
DWQ Project #06-0306
Montgomery County
Dear Ms. Karoly:
On behalf of the Town of Troy, we are providing the required written response to your April
25, 2006 letter. These responses address the items or actions mentioned in your letter, some of
which have not been completely resolved or addressed. The responses are in the order found
in your letter as follows:
Five copies of the USGS topographic map and Montgomery County soil survey
map of the site are enclosed for your review.
2. The location (vicinity) map is provided on the cover sheet of the drawings.
3. There are no proposed lot layouts at this time, however, this may be addressed
during the preparation of the required storm water management plan.
4. Five copies of a draft of the wetlands delineation is enclosed. Copies of a map
6 illustrating the wetlands will be submitted after completion of the field surveys
necessary to locate them on the site plan. It is our understanding from Mr. Brad
Shaver of the Corps of Engineers that the earliest date by which he can visit the site
to verify the results of the wetlands delineation is in late July. Please let us know if
a member of your staff must also visit the site to verify the wetlands delineation.
Temporary storm water management practices for the access road construction are
identified on the plans. The Town of Troy is requesting proposals for the
preparation of a storm water management plan for the entire site. It is our
understanding from discussions with your staff that preparation of a storm water
management plan can be included as a condition in the 401 certification. At this
time, we anticipate that the plan would be completed by September 2006.
6. See response to item 5.
7. As indicated in our April 5, 2006 letter, the percent imperviousness at "built-out"
conditions is estimated to be 50-70%. Again, this may be fine tuned during the
preparation of the additional information required by your letter, but it will likely
exceed the 30% threshold identified in WQC #3404.
P:\06059-06\4011etterldoe
Tritech Civil Environmental, PC
8. There are no storm water "outfalls" on the site. As indicated in our April 5, 2006
letter, the property map identifies an existing culvert in the northwest corner of the
site. However, we would not characterize this as an ` outfall."
9. Seven copies of the completed application page are enclosed.
10. The site plan illustrating the wetlands will be provided at a scale of 1"=50' or
smaller.
11. Cumulative and indirect impacts are addressed in our April 5, 2006 letter. The
wetlands on the remainder of the Business Center Site will not be crossed by
additional roads or disturbed by construction in the future (with the possible
exception of building sewer connections to the public sanitary sewer). This will be
addressed in the development of "lot layouts" and a storm water management plan.
The NC Division of Land Resources and Corps of Engineers have issued permits for
construction of the access road included in the drawings sent to your office. As indicated in our
April 5, 2006 letter, we would appreciate additional guidance from the 401 unit regarding the
minimum requirements for "lot layout" and the storm water management plan.
Please contact me (336-498-1060) or Gray Walls with the Town of Troy (910-572-3661) if you
have questions regarding this submittal.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this request.
Very truly yours,
Tritech Civil Environmental, PC
Larry Pearce, P.E.
Cc: Gray Walls, Town of Troy
Brad Shaver, Corps of Engineers
P:\06059-06\401letterldoc
Office Use Only: Fonn Version Much 05
X00603
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
X Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
X 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ? n
II. Applicant Information QGC?C a?1??
1. Owner/Applicant Information MAY 1 S 2006
Name: Town of Troy Cg 11R INA76ROUALITY
Mailing Address: 315 North Main Street liaritnNDSANl13fORfeRANC
Trot/ North Carolina 27371
Telephone Number: 910-572-3661 Fax Number: 910-572-3663
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Tritech Civil Environmental, PC
Company Affiliation: NA
Mailing Address: P. O. Box 4127
401 Commerce Place
Asheboro. NC 27204-4127
Telephone Number: 336-498-1060 Fax Number: 336-498-1070
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 6 of 13
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
3 0 6
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
X Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
X 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check }?????
II. Applicant Information W;(1111
MAY 1 8 2006 L"J
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Town of Troy R' WATER q(I
Mailing Address: 315 North Main Street -ffrutR aRAHCH
Troy, North Carolina 27371
Telephone Number: 910-572-3661 Fax Number: 910-572-3663
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Tritech Civil Environmental, PC
Company Affiliation: NA
Mailing Address: P. O. Box 4127
401 Commerce Place
Asheboro, NC 27204-4127
Telephone Number: 336-498-1060 Fax Number: 336-498-1070
E-mail Address: lwpearce(aatritechcivil.com
Page 6 of 13
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
n306
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
X Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
X 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information 9@RUNRD
D
1. Owner/Applicant Information MAY 1 8 2006
Name: Town of Troy
Mailing Address: 315 North Main Street 11R-
IYA
MRW-
Troy. North Carolina 27371 SrftWi7 R, Rq H
Telephone Number: 910-572-3661 Pax Number: 910-572-3663
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Tritech Civil Environmental. PC
Company Affiliation: NA
Mailing Address: P. O. Box 4127
401 Commerce Place
Asheboro. NC 27204-4127
Telephone Number: 336-498-1060 Pax Number: 336-498-1070
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 6 of 13
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 3 0 6
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
X Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
X 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check h# / ,,
II. Applicant Information VMAY ??
MAY 1 8 2006
1. Owner/Applicant Information ft DEN WATEI?
Name: Town of Tro "`Zrt4fsrm- _ q
Mailing Address: 315 North Main Street ffWft4WJ1
Troy, North Carolina 27371
Telephone Number: 910-572-3661 Fax Number: 910-572-3663
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Tritech Civil Environmental, PC
Company Affiliation: NA
Mailing Address: P. O. Box 4127
401 Commerce Place
Asheboro. NC 27204-4127
Telephone Number: 336-498-1060 Fax Number: 336-498-1070
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 6 of 13
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
o !? n
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(if any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A",)
1. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
X Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
X 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), chm
II. Applicant Information I MAY D
1 8 2006
1. Owner/Applicant Information oENe, w.r,_
Name: Town of Troy rmt1AUANDBibanW ALl?
,
Mailing Address: 00
315 North Main Street 4
Troy, North Carolina 27371

Telephone Number: 910-572-3661 Fax Number: 910-572-3663
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Tritech Civil Environmental, PC
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address: NA
P. O. Box 4127
401 Commerce Place
Asheboro, NC 27204-4127

Telephone Number:
E-mail Address: Iw 336-498-1060 Fax Number: 336-498-1070
pearcektritecheivil.com
Page 6 of 13
I a i'.*'
J; re
� _:P,
7*
046',

b ?
a N
BUSAN
d' ? ' ? ?MMIIM ? ?1' CAI
C?lm mill
f, 1
;W1,11 , r
"W o h'..r *'i ?' ft t a .l'.
R . i1 «, 6 77 sk}}
'MM? al.
r .3( 's1 9 'i ? 1 i dTo- lay.:
c- .+i "' r '? r •. ?:? it
+?d # tx • i? mod` ?+ ???;
44
Y 'r'? t h
.'o 1 WYR' : ilr'.ry
AWIL
?? jxf.???', T•f ? 1 .. .'4? ? v, t,?lly ''..., p ? ? "i ?? 1 ?.?t',i.
I t @, A fie. `. .r' ?
_ dV
r' BU
Sp 4
i * wA "W
L
w
AAW.
MJ .•'#'. _ J'?,' -. " Y,s ? in .+ t+-?p? y1 1 ?'ad {
-low
1 c+k:? a ,? I ' e, ?'
,: Ka #, #t 11 ?, ? y
gIIIIII????R';?,,,? y I n f I I ? Y ?j! !h?y 1j F P 6
41
i t ?. #r t # 1
140
4. , 1.J p § 4' ?? 1 X?
?»? .. i ! "gl w fir, ik? M?M ,ti a k+?1,•(
0` ?_1 r7r. V+F 1 j r
:??d i ?a; ?'r!F '?1, Y. ''`l`-#. I•,' .(..d 1 t? ,Id
?? irrl, ?' 1ti 4y, ?, a M? rl? d1 I ^ 1 ?1 .
S I r,
ilf ???7'???",q??p"91r 1'?p? .?! d,:=.? ?` 7kt ?.d itil, ?.' • ? s•; 1 i^?1,' 1, 1 ?1?,., ,?t ly
INX
41
BUS
ft-'
A 'P
Mw-
4. I 1{. -
C?m
J? ? Y fr ??k??ri ? ? to ; .n? `? ? T T ? u>?? •,
4 r K u a'? ,)?, is * 'MAr
t yr .,3'- d h 1:? 4 al q %{'.
?s: • , ? r gin' 1 ' ? ?,';? ? ?'? ??1n • ,,; i
FF Ai', 1 It lr?Af Ewa. .f
•i,?v ?UIf '?? ''?. to ? :jW I? 1 :T' t? a r _ ? yF'?a _ I??? ? r t ?'a ?, ?i,l n ?s r .?..,? ? :rye+'lil
,pµ 'r'v p7 F Y w t ,r
{,1 k 'N I 9f A?? ?• a ? ?? C i 4 f i t
Now
?jl, 40"
ILI'
i.:
wit-
t"
tl +
iq "'Mill
?r`iA, ra. S ? .? vY
j '
5 s ;
r ,~ F
JJ -
Y. t t
i
? 1 f
i =? ,(, 6 V r 1 / t J
' I
i t y• y .t f t 1' ???
07,
' 1 5 ??• ?/ } l 1, •? 7 ? ?.
,I I
, rrjr
1 ? 1' , ti ? y ` f
it

r .
- ??,? V ,?i ? ? r ~ ?•` ?? .i?.? `?..__• ? ? ??{ ? I?. ?•?• f ? _ Tye`
J7 '`•, 1 r r. I .fir f'? ff-"?!
l-
? + 4" r
• +• \\\
k-A
r _
1 ^
ji?
i:J r?
a ?f
r '
1 Y J
2 ? t
o
+ c K? ii L

,' J j •jl ?"'
' bo, ?' :?
?,// "r E
i 1 r
1i
f?-mot ', ! J
i r
77
j
r. i' ? ? \? ? r//•r ? } `--"??__`• it f
'YL
4 ? 5 '1
I,, j
? ? 't 1 ?.: 5. 1 4 4 r
I l ?
I f ?..- _ I ? r ? .l ' l
? t
f
r r f? ? r1
J ?^
/ • f , 1 .1 ,fit\#
t i? r c ? r
f ??` ,`?.? ? i - ? ^.? `.'ILA ?rr• f 'ti „' f i f •!r'-.- ?? ?-. ,
(lb
.47
3 1 r
1
J _ l1
'-
t ' r
x U
I `•
I
•-... + ?_ l i - 'fit , , \ -? c ? 1 ,% t ?j f , lr
r ?_ I
l-A
t
i A
-, ?? ¦ \
•ti`:
10
% ryry??tt 2 t It
t
40
l
_ i F S -'S t _ t
r
14
ti
rFR
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, RE, Director
Division of Water Quality
April 25, 2006
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Town of Troy
315 North Main Street
Troy, NC 27371
Subject Property: Troy Business Center Access Road
UT to Warner Creek [030715, 13-85-30-2, C]
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Sir or Madam:
DWQ Project # 06-0306, Ver. 2
Montgomery County
On April 11, 2006, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated April 6, 2006,
to impact 0.03 acres of wetland and 33 linear feet of perennial stream to construct the proposed access
road for trucks into a proposed business park. The DWQ has determined that your application was
incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will require additional
information in order to process your application to impact protected wetlands and/or streams on the
subject property. Therefore, unless we receive five copies of the additional information requested below,
we will have to move toward denial of your application as required by 15A NCAC 2H.0506 and will
place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information. Please provide the
following information so that we may continue to review your project.
Additional Information Requested:
I. Please provide legible copies of a USGS topographic map with the project boundaries clearly
shown, and a Watauga County Soil Survey aerial map with the project boundaries clearly shown.
2. Please provide a location map for the project.
3. Please indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on the site plan
4. Please locate all isolated wetland, stream and other Waters of the State as overlays on the site
plan
5. Please provide the location of any proposed stormwater management practices as required by
GC3404.
6. Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices as required by GC3404.
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone [phone]/ Fax[phone]
Internet: http://www.newaterquality.org
N oft
Caro na
a ura It
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Town of Troy
Page 2 of 2
April 25, 2006
7. Please specify the percent of project imperviousness area based on the estimated built-out
conditions.
8. Please indicate all stormwater outfalls on the site plan.
9. Please complete Section II, No. 2, on the application.
10. Please provide site plans at a scale of no smaller than 1 "=50'.
11. Please address indirect and cumulative impacts as a result of development of the business center,
per Section XIV of the PCN application.
12. Please be aware that if the DWQ issues a 401 Certification for this project, the conditions of that
Certification (plus any other conditions which may be added at the discretion of the DWQ) must
be strictly adhered to remain in compliance and avoid being in violation of your permit.
Furthermore, if you cannot meet the conditions of GC3404 as your project is currently proposed,
you will need to modify your design in which to do so.
Please contact the DWQ within three weeks of the date of this letter to verify that you have received this
letter and that you remain interested in continuing to pursue permitting of your project and will be
providing the DWQ the requested information at a later date. Please contact me in writing and Ken
Averitte of the DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office. If we do not hear from you within three weeks, we
will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project as withdrawn.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters
or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not
authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly or Mr. Ian McMillan at 919-733-
1786 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this matter.
Sincerely, NCY Karoly, Supervisor
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBK/ijm
cc: Ken Averitte, DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office
USACE Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Danny Smith, Compliance and Inspection Unit, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27609
Filename: 060306TroyBusCtrAccessRd(Mo ntgomery)On_Hold
Michael F. Easley, Governor
i William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
.? Alan W. Klimek, Y.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
May 22, 2006
DWQ Project # 06-0306, Ver. 2
Montgomery County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Town of Troy
315 North Main Street
Troy, NC 27371
Subject Property: Troy Business Center Access Road
UT to Warner Creek [030715, 13-85-30-2, C]
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Sir or Madam:
On April 11, 2006, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated April 6, 2006,
to impact 0.03 acres of wetland and 33 linear feet of perennial stream to construct the proposed access
road for trucks into a proposed business park. On May 18, 2006, the DWQ received additional
information from you, however, the DWQ has determined that your application remains incomplete
and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will require additional
information in order to process your application to impact protected wetlands and/or streams on the
subject property. Therefore, unless we receive five copies of the additional information requested below,
we will have to move toward denial of your application as required by 15A NCAC 2H.0506 and will
place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information. Please provide the
following information so that we may continue to review your project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Please indicate proposed lot layout with building envelopes as overlays on the site plan
2. Please locate all isolated wetland, stream and other Waters of the State as overlays on the site
plan. The map you have provided is not a wetlands delineation map.
3. Please provide the location of any proposed stormwater management practices as required by
GC3404.
4. Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices as required by GC3404.
5. Please specify the percent of project imperviousness area based on the estimated built-out
conditions.
6. Please indicate all stormwater outfalls on the site plan.
7. Please provide site plans at a scale of no smaller than I "=50'. NQQO"n?`hCaro ina
VlJIlICR?/jl
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Scrvice Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone[phone]/ Fax[phone]
Internet: hUp://"w.ncwaterqualily.org
An Equal Opportunity/Affimtative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Town of Troy
Page 2 of 2
May 22, 2006
8. Please address indirect and cumulative impacts as a result of development of the business center,
per Section XIV of the PCN application as described in our website under the Public Notice
Section.
9. Please be aware that if the DWQ issues a 401 Certification for this project, the conditions of that
Certification (plus any other conditions which may be added at the discretion of the DWQ) must
be strictly adhered to remain in compliance and avoid being in violation of your permit.
Furthermore, if you cannot meet the conditions of GC3404 as your project is currently proposed,
you will need to modify your design in which to do so.
Please provide the above requested information with 30 calendar days of the date of this letter. If the
requested information is not received in the DWQ Central office by June 22, 2006, your application will
be withdrawn and you will need to reapply for DWQ approval. This includes submitting a complete
application package with the appropriate fee. If you have questions, please contact me in writing and Ken
Averitte of the DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters
or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not
authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly or Mr. Ian McMillan at 919-733-
1786 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this matter.
S1 'rely, WL
,µ„_,
Cyndi Karoly, Supervisor
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBKlijm
cc: Ken Averitte, DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office
USACE Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Danny Smith, Compliance and Inspection Unit, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27609
Larry Pearce, Tritech Civil Environmental, PC, 401 Commerce Place, Asheboro, NC 27203
Filename: 060306TroyBusCtrAccessRd(Montgomery)On llald2
- Tritech Civil Environmental, PC
WATER & WASTEWATER ENGINEERS
105
Z?:TRITECH-\ 401 Commerce Place • Asheboro, North Carolina 27203 • [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Post Office Box 4127 • Asheboro, North Carolina 27204 • [phone]
NC Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality 401 Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Attention: Mr. Ian McMillan
Gentlemen:
July 5, 2006
Subject: Troy Business Center Access Road
DWQ Project #06-0306
Montgomery County
On behalf of the Town of Troy, we are providing five copies of the wetland delineation
report prepared by ECS Carolinas, LLP. We have emailed copies (pdf files) of the wetland
delineation drawings resulting from our field surveys, verified on June 29, 2006 by the
Corps of Engineers. When our surveying manager returns from vacation next Monday, we
will mail five copies of the signed and sealed drawings to you.
Please contact me (336-498-1060) or Gray Walls with the Town of Troy (910-572-3661) if
you have questions regarding this submittal.
Very truly yours,
Tritech Civil Environmental, PC

Cc: Gray Walls, Town of Troy
Larry Pearce, P.E.
a??D
Q 6 ??p6
pENN?p S?,??t??P'tERBRP?""'
P:\06059-06\4011etter1doc
WqLLP
CAROLINAS
ECS CAROLINAS, LLP
Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental
May 22, 2006
Mr. Larry Pearce
Tritech Civil Environmental, PC
401 Commerce Place
Asheboro, NC 27203
Reference: Report of Jurisdictional Waters/Wetland Delineation
Q
Troy Business Center JUL 0 6 2006
Highway 24/27 @ SR 1138
Troy, North Carolina
ECS Project G-12562 WETLANDENR DS ANDS NDS -AND WATER STORMWATER B WATER BY
RANCH
Dear Mr. Pearce:
ECS Carolinas, LLP (ECS) is pleased to submit this report of the jurisdictional waters/wetland
delineation for the site located north of the intersection of Highway 24/27 and SR 1138 in Troy, North
Carolina. This report summarizes our findings for the site.
Background
ECS was contracted to identify the locations of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, for the above
referenced site. The site contains a business park and undeveloped, wooded land.
Wetlands are defined by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the United States Environmental
Protection Agency as "those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a
frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances, do support a prevalence of
vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions." In order for an area to be classified as
wetland, hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology indicators must be present.
Literature Review
We have reviewed the USGS Topographic Map, the Soil Survey of Montgomery County and the
Geologic Map of North Carolina to obtain information regarding the site.
The USGS Topographic Map (Figure 1) indicates that two unnamed tributaries to Werner Creek
cross the site. Surface drainage appears to be toward the unnamed tributaries to Werner Creek across
the site.
The USDA Soil Survey of Montgomery County (Figure 2) shows unnamed tributaries to Werner
Creek crossing the site. Soils on the site are mapped as Herndon silt loam (13013 and 130C). The
Herndon series consists of well drained, moderately permeable soils that occur on gently sloping to
moderately steep Piedmont uplands. The Herndon series is not included on the Hydric Soils List for
Montgomery County.
4811 Koger Boulevard • Greensboro, NC 27407 9 [phone] • Fax [phone]
Troy Business Park -Highway 24127 at SR 1138
Troy, North Carolina
ECS, Ltd. Project G-12562
May 22, 2006
The Geologic Map of North Carolina indicates that the site is located in the Carolina Slate Belt of the
Piedmont Physiographic Province. The soils encountered in this area are the residual product of in-
place chemical weathering of rock presently underlying the site. In general, shallow unconfined
groundwater movement within the overlying soils is controlled largely by topographic gradients.
Recharge occurs primarily by infiltration along higher elevations and typically discharges into
streams or other surface water bodies. The elevation of the shallow water table is transient and can
vary greatly with seasonal fluctuations in precipitation. Movement in this water table is generally
from higher to lower elevations. As such, shallow groundwater would be expected to flow beneath
the site toward the unnamed tributaries to Werner Creek.
Site Reconnaissance
ECS personnel conducted the site reconnaissance on May 12, 2006. The site is located north of the
intersection of Highway 24/21 and SR 1138 in Troy, North Carolina. The site contains a business park
and undeveloped, wooded land.
During our reconnaissance, we observed the site for evidence of stream channels, wetlands and ponds.
Two streams cross the site. The streams have defined beds and banks, meanders and contained flowing
water at the time of our reconnaissance. Crayfish, frogs, salamanders and fish (minnows) were observed
in the streams. It is our opinion that the stream is perennial. The stream designation is based on our
opinion and should be used for preliminary planning purposes only. The designation is subject to change
based on verification by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (NCDWQ).
Wetland hydrology indicators (including inundation and saturated soils), hydrophytic vegetation and
hydric soils were observed adjacent to the streams that cross the site. In most areas, the wetlands are
separated from surrounding uplands by distinct topographic breaks, vegetation breaks and soil breaks.
Upland areas surrounding the wetland pocket are vegetated primarily with hardwood species. The soils
are bright and appear to be well drained to depths of at least twelve inches. The centerlines of the streams
and the wetland boundaries were flagged in the field by ECS personnel. Figure 3 shows the approximate
locations of the stream, pond and wetlands on the site. Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms
containing field observations at the locations identified on Figure 3 are included as Attachments.
Figure 3 is based solely on the field notes of ECS personnel and is intended for preliminary planning
purposes. We recommend that our flags be surveyed to determine the exact locations and extent of the
streams and wetlands on the site.
Discussion
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act regulates the discharge of dredge and fill materials into waters of the
United States (lakes, rivers, ponds, streams, etc.), including wetlands. Waters of the United States include
the territorial seas, navigable coastal and inland lakes, rivers and streams, intermittent streams, and
wetlands. Activities that could be regulated under Section 404 include placement of fill for construction
of roadways; residential, commercial or industrial structures; and the construction of water retention
ponds along tributaries. The EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers jointly administer the Section
404 program. Section 401 of the Clean Water Act grants each state the authority to approve, condition, or
deny any Federal permits that could result in a discharge to State waters.
Troy Business Park -Highway 24127 at SR 1138
Troy, North Carolina
ECS, Ltd. Project G-12562
May 22, 2006
The streams and wetlands located on the site are regulated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality. We recommend that the delineated boundaries be verified by
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. A metes and bounds survey of the jurisdictional boundaries should be
conducted after the USACE verification to determine their exact locations and extent. Upon completion, a
copy of the wetland/stream survey map should be submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for
final approval. A site/grading plan can then be developed to determine the extent of the proposed impacts
to jurisdictional waters and wetlands, if any. An attempt should be made to minimize or avoid working in
these areas, if possible.
Permits will be required prior to impacting more than 1/10 acre of wetlands or any open waters, including
perennial or intermittent streams. Mitigation and a stormwater management plan may be a condition of
any permits issued for the site. In addition, buffers may be required adjacent to the streams, and wetlands.
For impacts to more than one-half acre of wetlands or to more than 300 linear feet of stream channel, an
individual permit (IP) may be required. An IP requires a habitat analysis, alternative site analysis, project
justification, plans to avoid and minimize impacts, and a proposed mitigation plan. Depending on the
habitat analysis and the extent of impacts, an Environmental Impact Statement may be required by the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. An IP allows for a public comment period and may require 4 to 18
months to obtain depending on conditions arising during the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers review and
public comment period.
ECS appreciates the opportunity to provide wetland services for your project. Please contact us at (336)
856-7150 if you have questions concerning this report.
Sincerely,
ECS CAROLINAS, LLP
Michael T. Brame
Project Scientist
Attachments: Figure 1 - Site Location Map
Figure 2 - Soil Map
Figure 3 - Stream/Wetland Location Map
Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms

Brian E. Maas, REM
Principal Scientist
1_ _i
THE STREAM/WETLAND LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE APPROXIMATE. THEY HAVE BEEN FLAGGED IN
THE FIELD BY ECS PERSONNEL. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE U.S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND
THEY HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED.
Legend
.? = Approximate location of stream
= Approximate* location of wetland
W = Approximate location of culvert
DP- l =Approximate location of data point
U.7-1 SOURCE:
T
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP AND FIELD
NOTES PREPARED BY ECS PERSONNEL
NOT TO SCALE
FIGURE 3
STREAM/WETLAND LOCATION MAP
TROY BUSINESS CENTER
HIGHWAY 24/27 AT SR 1138
"TROY, NORTH CAROLINA
j f I I
I
L_
/ `
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual
Project/Site: Troy Business Center - Highway 24/27 at SR 1138 Project No: Date: May 18, 2006
Applicant/Owner: Tritech Civil Environmental, PC County: Montgomery
Investigators: ECS, Carolinas, LLP G-12562 State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-1
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? ?Yes ® No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ® No Field Location: View Figure 3
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
Juncus sp.
Rush sp. Herb FACW
Osmunda cinnamomea
Cinnamon fern Herb FACW+
Carex sp.
Sedge sp. Herb FACW
Acer rubrum
Red maple Tree/Sap FAC

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 100% FAC Neutral:
Numeric Index:
Remarks:
The dominant vegetation is hydrophytic.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
? Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs
? Other

® No Recorded Data

Field Observations

Depth of Surface Water: 0"

Depth to Free Water in Pit: 6"

Depth to Saturated Soil: 4" Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators
? Inundated
® Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators
? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
? Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
® FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are present.
(Wetform) Page I of 2
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual

Project/Site: Troy Business Center - Highway 24/27 at SR 1138
Project No: _
Date: May 18, 2006
Applicant/Owner: Tritech Civil Environmental, PC County: Montgomery
Investigators: ECS, Carolinas, LLP G-12562 State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-1
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Herndon silt loam
Map Symbol: 130C
Mapped Hydric Inclusion? ?Yes ® No
Drainage Class: Well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic hapludults Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type: ?Yes ® No
Profile Descri tion
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
inches Horizon Munsell Moist (Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc.
0-12" 2.5Y 4/1 10YR 4/6 20% Loam

- 7
Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
® Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are present.
IL-
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ®Yes 0 No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? ®yes ? No
Remarks:
The three wetland criteria are present. The sampling point is located within a wetland.
(Wetform) Page 2 of 2
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual
Project/Site: Troy Business Center - Highway 24/27 at SR 1138 Project No: Date: May 18, 2006
Applicant/Owner: Tritech Civil Environmental, PC County: Montgomery
Investigators: ECS, Carolinas, LLP G-12562 State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-2
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? ?Yes ® No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ® No Field Location: View Figure 3
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
Acer rubrum
Red maple Tree/Sap FAC
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tulip tree Tree/Sap FAC
Liquidambar styraciflua
Sweet gum Tree/Sap FAC+
Lonicera japonica
Japanese honeysuckle Vine FAC-

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC: 75%
(excluding FAC-) FAC Neutral:
Numeric Index:
Remarks:
The dominant vegetation is hydrophytic.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
? Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
? Aerial Photographs ? Inundated
? Other ? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
? Water Marks
® No Recorded Data ? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
Field Observations ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators
Depth of Surface Water: 0" ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
? Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >12" ? Local Soil Survey Data
? FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: >12" ? Other (Explain in Remarks)

h
ydrology indicators are not present.
(Wetform) Page 1 of2
` DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Troy Business Center-Highway 24/27 at SR 1138 Project No: Date: May 18, 2006
Applicant/Owner: Tritech Civil Environmental, PC County: Montgomery
Investigators: ECS, Carolinas, LLP G-12562 State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-2
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Herndon silt loam
Map Symbol: 130C Mapped Hydric Inclusion? ?Yes ® No
Drainage Class: Well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic hapludults Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type: ®Yes ? No
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc.
0-12" 7.5YR 4/6 0% Loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon
? Sulfidic Odor ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are not present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ?yes ®No
Hydric Soils Present? ?yes ® No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology and hydric soil indicators are not present. The sampling point is not located within a wetland.
(Wetform) Page 2 of 2
EVq
LLP
CAROLINAS
ECS CAROLINAS, LLP
Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental
May 22, 2006
Mr. Larry Pearce
Tritech Civil Environmental, PC
401 Commerce Place
Asheboro, NC 27203
Reference: Report of Jurisdictional Waters/Wetland Delineation
Troy Business Center
Highway 24/27 @ SR 1138
Troy, North Carolina
ECS Project G-12562
Dear Mr. Pearce:
JUL 0 6 2006
DENR - WATER QUALITY
11LMI01 AND STORMWATER BRAND,
ECS Carolinas, LLP (ECS) is pleased to submit this report of the jurisdictional waters/wetland
delineation for the site located north of the intersection of Highway 24/27 and SR 1138 in Troy, North
Carolina. This report summarizes our findings for the site.
Background
ECS was contracted to identify the locations of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, for the above
referenced site. The site contains a business park and undeveloped, wooded land.
Wetlands are defined by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the United States Environmental
Protection Agency as "those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a
frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances, do support a prevalence of
vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions." In order for an area to be classified as
wetland, hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology indicators must be present.
Literature Review
We have reviewed the USGS Topographic Map, the Soil Survey of Montgomery County and the
Geologic Map of North Carolina to obtain information regarding the site.
The USGS Topographic Map (Figure 1) indicates that two unnamed tributaries to Werner Creek
cross the site. Surface drainage appears to be toward the unnamed tributaries to Werner Creek across
the site.
The USDA Soil Survey of Montgomery County (Figure 2) shows unnamed tributaries to Werner
Creek crossing the site. Soils on the site are mapped as Herndon silt loam (130B and 130C). The
Herndon series consists of well drained, moderately permeable soils that occur on gently sloping to
moderately steep Piedmont uplands. The Herndon series is not included on the Hydric Soils List for
Montgomery County.
4811 Koger Boulevard • Greensboro, NC 27407 • [phone] • Fax [phone]
i
Troy Business Park - Highway 24/27 at SR 1138
Troy, North Carolina
ECS, Ltd. Project G-12562
May 22, 2006
The Geologic Map of North Carolina indicates that the site is located in the Carolina Slate Belt of the
Piedmont Physiographic Province. The soils encountered in this area are the residual product of in-
place chemical weathering of rock presently underlying the site. In general, shallow unconfined
groundwater movement within the overlying soils is controlled largely by topographic gradients.
Recharge occurs primarily by infiltration along higher elevations and typically discharges into
streams or other surface water bodies. The elevation of the shallow water table is transient and can
vary greatly with seasonal fluctuations in precipitation. Movement in this water table is generally
from higher to lower elevations. As such, shallow groundwater would be expected to flow beneath
the site toward the unnamed tributaries to Werner Creek.
Site Reconnaissance
ECS personnel conducted the site reconnaissance on May 12, 2006. The site is located north of the
intersection of Highway 24/27 and SR 1138 in Troy, North Carolina. The site contains a business park
and undeveloped, wooded land.
During our reconnaissance, we observed the site for evidence of stream channels, wetlands and ponds.
Two streams cross the site. The streams have defined beds and banks, meanders and contained flowing
water at the time of our reconnaissance. Crayfish, frogs, salamanders and fish (minnows) were observed
in the streams. It is our opinion that the stream is perennial. The stream designation is based on our
opinion and should be used for preliminary planning purposes only. The designation is subject to change
based on verification by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (NCDWQ).
Wetland hydrology indicators (including inundation and saturated soils), hydrophytic vegetation and
hydric soils were observed adjacent to the streams that cross the site. In most areas, the wetlands are
separated from surrounding uplands by distinct topographic breaks, vegetation breaks and soil breaks.
Upland areas surrounding the wetland pocket are vegetated primarily with hardwood species. The soils
are bright and appear to be well drained to depths of at least twelve inches. The centerlines of the streams
and the wetland boundaries were flagged in the field by ECS personnel. Figure 3 shows the approximate
locations of the stream, pond and wetlands on the site. Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms
containing field observations at the locations identified on Figure 3 are included as Attachments.
Figure 3 is based solely on the field notes of ECS personnel and is intended for preliminary planning
purposes. We recommend that our flags be surveyed to determine the exact locations and extent of the
streams and wetlands on the site.
Discussion
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act regulates the discharge of dredge and fill materials into waters of the
United States (lakes, rivers, ponds, streams, etc.), including wetlands. Waters of the United States include
the territorial seas, navigable coastal and inland lakes, rivers and streams, intermittent streams, and
wetlands. Activities that could be regulated under Section 404 include placement of fill for construction
of roadways; residential, commercial or industrial structures; and the construction of water retention
ponds along tributaries. The EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers jointly administer the Section
404 program. Section 401 of the Clean Water Act grants each state the authority to approve, condition, or
deny any Federal permits that could result in a discharge to State waters.
2
Troy Business Park - Highway 24127 at SR 1138
Troy, North Carolina
ECS, Ltd. Project G-12562
May 22, 2006
The streams and wetlands located on the site are regulated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality. We recommend that the delineated boundaries be verified by
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. A metes and bounds survey of the jurisdictional boundaries should be
conducted after the USACE verification to determine their exact locations and extent. Upon completion, a
copy of the wetland/stream survey map should be submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for
final approval. A site/grading plan can then be developed to determine the extent of the proposed impacts
to jurisdictional waters and wetlands, if any. An attempt should be made to minimize or avoid working in
these areas, if possible.
Permits will be required prior to impacting more than 1/10 acre of wetlands or any open waters, including
perennial or intermittent streams. Mitigation and a stormwater management plan may be a condition of
any permits issued for the site. In addition, buffers may be required adjacent to the streams, and wetlands.
For impacts to more than one-half acre of wetlands or to more than 300 linear feet of stream channel, an
individual permit (IP) may be required. An IP requires a habitat analysis, alternative site analysis, project
justification, plans to avoid and minimize impacts, and a proposed mitigation plan. Depending on the
habitat analysis and the extent of impacts, an Environmental Impact Statement may be required by the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. An IP allows for a public comment period and may require 4 to 18
months to obtain depending on conditions arising during the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers review and
public comment period.
ECS appreciates the opportunity to provide wetland services for your project. Please contact us at (336)
856-7150 if you have questions concerning this report.
Sincerely,
ECS CAROLINAS, LLP
Michael T. Brame
Project Scientist
Attachments: Figure 1 - Site Location Map
Figure 2 - Soil Map
Figure 3 - Streatn/Wetland Location Map
Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms
Brian E. Maas, REM
Principal Scientist
THE STREAM/WETLAND LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE APPROXIMATE. THEY HAVE BEEN FL
THE FIELD BY ECS PERSONNEL. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE U.S ARMY CORPS OF ENGIN
THEY HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED.
e /
Legend
• = Approximate location of stream
- = Approximate location of wetland
= Approximate location of culvert
DP-1 =Approximate location of data point
• SOURCE: FIGURE 3
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP AND FIELD ra7 STREAM/WETLAND LO
UP TROY BUSINESS (
NOTES PREPARED BY ECS PERSONNEL
HIGHWAY 24/27 Al
NOT TO SCALE "TROY, NORTH CA
C`ARC)I INX;

?TION MAP
JTER
R 1138
LINA
125
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Troy Business Center - Highway 24/27 at SR 1138 Project No: Date: May 18, 2006
Applicant/Owner: Tritech Civil Environmental, PC County: Montgomery
Investigators: ECS, Carolinas, LLP G-12562 State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-1
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? ?Yes ® No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ® No Field Location: View Figure 3
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
Juncus sp.
Rush sp. Herb FACW
Osmunda cinnamomea
Cinnamon fern Herb FACW+
Carex sp.
Sedge sp. Herb FACW
Acer rubrum
Red maple Tree/Sap FAC

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC: 100%
(excluding FAC-) FAC Neutral:
Numeric Index:
Remarks:
The dominant vegetation is hydrophytic.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
? Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs
? Other

® No Recorded Data

Field Observations

Depth of Surface Water: 0"

Depth to Free Water in Pit: 6"

Depth to Saturated Soil: 4" Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators
? Inundated
® Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators
? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
® FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are present.
(Wetform) Page 1 of 2
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual
_
Project/Site: Troy Business Center - Highway 24/27 at SR 1138 Project No: Date: May 18, 2006
Applicant/Owner: Tritech Civil Environmental, PC County: Montgomery
Investigators: ECS, Carolinas, LLP G-12562 State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-1
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Herndon silt loam
Map Symbol: 130C
Mapped Hydric Inclusion? ?Yes ® No
Drainage Class: Well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic hapludults Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type: ?Yes ®No
Profile Descri tion
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist (Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc.
0-12" 2.5Y 4/1 1OYR 4/6 20% Loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
® Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are present.
L-
- I
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ®Yes u No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? ®Yes QNo
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ? No
Hydric Soils Present? f
L?ffes 7l ? No
Remarks:
The three wetland criteria are present. The sampling point is located within a wetland.
(Wetform) Page 2 of 2
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual
Project/Site: Troy Business Center - Highway 24/27 at SR 1138 Project No: Date: May 18, 2006
Applicant/Owner: Tritech Civil Environmental, PC County: Montgomery
Investigators: ECS, Carolinas, LLP G-12562 State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-2
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? ?Yes ® No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ® No Field Location: View Figure 3
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
Acer rubrum
Red maple Tree/Sap FAC
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tulip tree Tree/Sap FAC
Liquidambar styraciflua
Sweet gum Tree/Sap FAC+
Lonicera japonica
Japanese honeysuckle Vine FAC-

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC: 75%
(excluding FAC-) FAC Neutral:
Numeric Index:
Remarks:
The dominant vegetation is hydrophytic.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
? Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
? Aerial Photographs ? Inundated
? Other ? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
® No Recorded Data ? Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
H
Field Observations Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators
Depth of Surface Water: 0" ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
? Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >12" ? Local Soil Survey Data
? FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: >12" ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are not present.
(Wetform) Page I of 2
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Troy Business Center - Highway 24/27 at SR 1138 Project No: Date: May 18, 2006
Applicant/Owner: Tritech Civil Environmental, PC County: Montgomery
Investigators: ECS, Carolinas, LLP G-12562 State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-2
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Herndon silt loam
Map Symbol: 130C
Mapped Hydric Inclusion? ?Yes "No
Drainage Class: Well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic hapludults Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type: ®Yes ? No
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc.
0-12" 7.5YR 4/6 0% Loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are not present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Oyes ® No
Hydric Soils Present? Oyes ® No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology and hydric soil indicators are not present. The sampling point is not located within a wetland.
(Wetform) Page 2 of 2
=?SLLP
CAROLINAS
ECS CAROLINAS, LLP
Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental
May 22, 2006
Mr. Larry Pearce
Tritech Civil Environmental, PC
401 Commerce Place
Asheboro, NC 27203
Reference: Report of Jurisdictional Waters/Wetland Delineation
Troy Business Center
Highway 24/27 @ SR 1138
Troy, North Carolina
ECS Project G-12562
Dear Mr. Pearce:
D Jtjt 0
6 2006
eft STT
ftw? QUAL/Ty
ToBRw/1
ECS Carolinas, LLP (ECS) is pleased to submit this report of the jurisdictional waters/wetland
delineation for the site located north of the intersection of Highway 24/27 and SR 1138 in Troy, North
Carolina. This report summarizes our findings for the site.
Background
ECS was contracted to identify the locations of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, for the above
referenced site. The site contains a business park and undeveloped, wooded land.
Wetlands are defined by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the United States Environmental
Protection Agency as "those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a
frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances, do support a prevalence of
vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions." In order for an area to be classified as
wetland, hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology indicators must be present.
Literature Review
We have reviewed the USGS Topographic Map, the Soil Survey of Montgomery County and the
Geologic Map of North Carolina to obtain information regarding the site.
The USGS Topographic Map (Figure 1) indicates that two unnamed tributaries to Werner Creek
cross the site. Surface drainage appears to be toward the unnamed tributaries to Werner Creek across
the site.
The USDA Soil Survey of Montgomery County (Figure 2) shows unnamed tributaries to Werner
Creek crossing the site. Soils on the site are mapped as Herndon silt loam (130B and 130C). The
Herndon series consists of well drained, moderately permeable soils that occur on gently sloping to
moderately steep Piedmont uplands. The Herndon series is not included on the Hydric Soils List for
Montgomery County.
4811 Koger Boulevard 9 Greensboro, NC 27407 • [phone] • Fax [phone]
Troy Business Park - Highway 24127 at SR 1138
Troy, North Carolina
ECS, Ltd. Project G-12562
May 22, 2006
The Geologic Map of North Carolina indicates that the site is located in the Carolina Slate Belt of the
Piedmont Physiographic Province. The soils encountered in this area are the residual product of in-
place chemical weathering of rock presently underlying the site. In general, shallow unconfined
groundwater movement within the overlying soils is controlled largely by topographic gradients.
Recharge occurs primarily by infiltration along higher elevations and typically discharges into
streams or other surface water bodies. The elevation of the shallow water table is transient and can
vary greatly with seasonal fluctuations in precipitation. Movement in this water table is generally
from higher to lower elevations. As such, shallow groundwater would be expected to flow beneath
the site toward the unnamed tributaries to Werner Creek.
Site Reconnaissance
ECS personnel conducted the site reconnaissance on May 12, 2006. The site is located north of the
intersection of Highway 24/27 and SR 1138 in Troy, North Carolina. The site contains a business park
and undeveloped, wooded land.
During our reconnaissance, we observed the site for evidence of stream channels, wetlands and ponds.
Two streams cross the site. The streams have defined beds and banks, meanders and contained flowing
water at the time of our reconnaissance. Crayfish, frogs, salamanders and fish (minnows) were observed
in the streams. It is our opinion that the stream is perennial. The stream designation is based on our
opinion and should be used for preliminary planning purposes only. The designation is subject to change
based on verification by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (NCDWQ).
Wetland hydrology indicators (including inundation and saturated soils), hydrophytic vegetation and
hydric soils were observed adjacent to the streams that cross the site. In most areas, the wetlands are
separated from surrounding uplands by distinct topographic breaks, vegetation breaks and soil breaks.
Upland areas surrounding the wetland pocket are vegetated primarily with hardwood species. The soils
are bright and appear to be well drained to depths of at least twelve inches. The centerlines of the streams
and the wetland boundaries were flagged in the field by ECS personnel. Figure 3 shows the approximate
locations of the stream, pond and wetlands on the site. Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms
containing field observations at the locations identified on Figure 3 are included as Attachments.
Figure 3 is based solely on the field notes of ECS personnel and is intended for preliminary planning
purposes. We recommend that our flags be surveyed to determine the exact locations and extent of the
streams and wetlands on the site.
Discussion
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act regulates the discharge of dredge and fill materials into waters of the
United States (lakes, rivers, ponds, streams, etc.), including wetlands. Waters of the United States include
the territorial seas, navigable coastal and inland lakes, rivers and streams, intermittent streams, and
wetlands. Activities that could be regulated under Section 404 include placement of fill for construction
of roadways; residential, commercial or industrial structures; and the construction of water retention
ponds along tributaries. The EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers jointly administer the Section
404 program. Section 401 of the Clean Water Act grants each state the authority to approve, condition, or
deny any Federal permits that could result in a discharge to State waters.
2
Troy Business Park -Highway 24127 at SR 1138
Troy, North Carolina
ECS, Ltd. Project G-12562
May 22, 2006
The streams and wetlands located on the site are regulated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality. We recommend that the delineated boundaries be verified by
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. A metes and bounds survey of the jurisdictional boundaries should be
conducted after the USACE verification to determine their exact locations and extent. Upon completion, a
copy of the wetland/stream survey map should be submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for
final approval. A site/grading plan can then be developed to determine the extent of the proposed impacts
to jurisdictional waters and wetlands, if any. An attempt should be made to minimize or avoid working in
these areas, if possible.
Permits will be required prior to impacting more than 1/10 acre of wetlands or any open waters, including
perennial or intermittent streams. Mitigation and a stormwater management plan may be a condition of
any permits issued for the site. In addition, buffers may be required adjacent to the streams, and wetlands.
For impacts to more than one-half acre of wetlands or to more than 300 linear feet of stream channel, an
individual permit (IP) may be required. An IP requires a habitat analysis, alternative site analysis, project
justification, plans to avoid and minimize impacts, and a proposed mitigation plan. Depending on the
habitat analysis and the extent of impacts, an Environmental Impact Statement may be required by the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. An IP allows for a public comment period and may require 4 to 18
months to obtain depending on conditions arising during the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers review and
public comment period.
ECS appreciates the opportunity to provide wetland services for your project. Please contact us at (336)
856-7150 if you have questions concerning this report.
Sincerely,
ECS CAROLINAS, LLP
AMichael JTBrame
Project Scientist
Attachments: Figure 1 - Site Location Map
Figure 2 - Soil Map
Figure 3 - Stream/Wetland Location Map
Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms
'Jar
Brian E. Maas, REM
Principal Scientist
THE STREAM/WETLAND LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE APPROXIMATE. THEY HAVE B'.
THE FIELD BY ECS PERSONNEL. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE U.S ARMY CORPS OF
THEY HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED.
Legend
... = Approximate location of stream
- = Approximate location of wetland
= Approximate location of culvert
DP-1 =Approximate location of data point
- SOURCE:
s
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP AND FIELD
NOTES PREPARED BY ECS PERSONNEL
NOT TO SCALD
FIGURE 3
07LL STREAM/WETLAND LOCATIO'.
UP TROY BUSINESS CENTER
HIGHWAY 24/27 AT SR 113
TROY, NORTH CAROLINA
nAE3rv IKIAC%

D IN
AND

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Troy Business Center - Highway 24/27 at SR 1138 Project No: Date: May 18, 2006
Applicant/Owner: Tritech Civil Environmental, PC County: Montgomery
Investigators: ECS, Carolinas, LLP G-12562 State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-1
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? ?Yes ® No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ® No Field Location: View Figure 3
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
Juncus sp.
Rush sp. Herb FACW
Osmunda cinnamomea
Cinnamon fern Herb FACW+
Carex sp.
Sedge sp. Herb FACW
Acer rubrum
Red maple Tree/Sap FAC

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 100% FAC Neutral:
Numeric Index:
Remarks:
The dominant vegetation is hydrophytic.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
? Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs
? Other

® No Recorded Data

Field Observations

Depth of Surface Water: 0"

Depth to Free Water in Pit: 6"

Depth to Saturated Soil: 4" Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators
? Inundated
® Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators
? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
? Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
® FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are present.
(Wetform) Page 1 of 2
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual
Project/Site: Troy Business Center - Highway 24/27 at SR 1138 Project No: Date: May 18, 2006
Applicant/Owner: Tritech Civil Environmental, PC County: Montgomery
Investigators: ECS, Carolinas, LLP G-12562 State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-1
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Herndon silt loam
Map Symbol: 130C
Mapped Hydric Inclusion? ?Yes ® No
Drainage Class: Well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic hapludults Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type: ?Yes ® No
Profile Descri tion
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc.
0-12" 2.5Y 4/1 10YR 4/6 20% Loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
® Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ®yes ? No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? ®Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? ®yes ? No
Remarks:
The three wetland criteria are present. The sampling point is located within a wetland.
(Wetform) Page 2 of 2
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Troy Business Center - Highway 24/27 at SR 1138 Project No: Date: May 18, 2006
Applicant/Owner: Tritech Civil Environmental, PC County: Montgomery
Investigators: ECS, Carolinas, LLP G-12562 State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-2
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? ?Yes ® No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ® No Field Location: View Figure 3
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
Acer rubrum
Red maple Tree/Sap FAC
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tulip tree Tree/Sap FAC
Liquidambar styraciflua
Sweet gum Tree/Sap FAC+
Lonicera japonica
Japanese honeysuckle Vine FAC-

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC:
(excluding FAC-) 75% FAC Neutral:
Numeric Index:
Remarks:
The dominant vegetation is hydrophytic.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
? Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs
? Other

® No Recorded Data

Field Observations

Depth of Surface Water: 0"

Depth to Free Water in Pit: >12"

Depth to Saturated Soil: >12" Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators
? Inundated
? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators
? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
? Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
? FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are not present.
(Wetform) Page 1 of 2
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Troy Business Center -Highway 24/27 at SR 1138 Project No: Date: May 18, 2006
Applicant/Owner: Tritech Civil Environmental, PC County: Montgomery
Investigators: ECS, Carolinas, LLP G-12562 State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-2
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Herndon silt loam
Map Symbol: 130C Mapped Hydric Inclusion? ?Yes ® No
Drainage Class: Well drained Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type: ®Yes ? No
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic hapludults
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon Munsell Moist (Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc.
0-12" 7.5YR 4/6 0% Loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are not present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ?yes ®No
Hydric Soils Present? ?yes ® No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology and hydric soil indicators are not present. The sampling point is not located within a wetland.
(Wetform) Page 2 of 2
EV
?3 LLP
CAROLINAS
ECS CAROLINAS, LLP
Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental
May 22, 2006
Mr. Larry Pearce
Tritech Civil Environmental, PC
401 Commerce Place
Asheboro, NC 27203
Reference: Report of Jurisdictional Waters/Wetland Delineation
Troy Business Center n
Hgll@
ighway 24/27 @ SR 1138
Troy, North Carolina u+? U L 0 6 2006
ECS Project G-12562
Dear Mr. Pearce:
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORNIWATER BRANCH
ECS Carolinas, LLP (ECS) is pleased to submit this report of the jurisdictional waters/wetland
delineation for the site located north of the intersection of Highway 24/27 and SR 1138 in Troy, North
Carolina. This report summarizes our findings for the site.
Background
ECS was contracted to identify the locations of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, for the above
referenced site. The site contains a business park and undeveloped, wooded land.
Wetlands are defined by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the United States Environmental
Protection Agency as "those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a
frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances, do support a prevalence of
vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions." In order for an area to be classified as
wetland, hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology indicators must be present.
Literature Review
We have reviewed the USGS Topographic Map, the Soil Survey of Montgomery County and the
Geologic Map of North Carolina to obtain information regarding the site.
The USGS Topographic Map (Figure 1) indicates that two unnamed tributaries to Werner Creek
cross the site. Surface drainage appears to be toward the unnamed tributaries to Werner Creek across
the site.
The USDA Soil Survey of Montgomery County (Figure 2) shows unnamed tributaries to Werner
Creek crossing the site. Soils on the site are mapped as Herndon silt loam (13013 and 130C). The
Herndon series consists of well drained, moderately permeable soils that occur on gently sloping to
moderately steep Piedmont uplands. The Herndon series is not included on the Hydric Soils List for
Montgomery County.
4811 Koger Boulevard 9 Greensboro, NC 27407 • [phone] • Fax [phone]
Troy Business Park - Highway 24127 at SR 1138
Troy, North Carolina
ECS, Ltd. Project G-12562
May 22, 2006
The Geologic Map of North Carolina indicates that the site is located in the Carolina Slate Belt of the
Piedmont Physiographic Province. The soils encountered in this area are the residual product of in-
place chemical weathering of rock presently underlying the site. In general, shallow unconfined
groundwater movement within the overlying soils is controlled largely by topographic gradients.
Recharge occurs primarily by infiltration along higher elevations and typically discharges into
streams or other surface water bodies. The elevation of the shallow water table is transient and can
vary greatly with seasonal fluctuations in precipitation. Movement in this water table is generally
from higher to lower elevations. As such, shallow groundwater would be expected to flow beneath
the site toward the unnamed tributaries to Werner Creek.
Site Reconnaissance
ECS personnel conducted the site reconnaissance on May 12, 2006. The site is located north of the
intersection of Highway 24/27 and SR 1138 in Troy, North Carolina. The site contains a business park
and undeveloped, wooded land.
During our reconnaissance, we observed the site for evidence of stream channels, wetlands and ponds.
Two streams cross the site. The streams have defined beds and banks, meanders and contained flowing
water at the time of our reconnaissance. Crayfish, frogs, salamanders and fish (minnows) were observed
in the streams. It is our opinion that the stream is perennial. The stream designation is based on our
opinion and should be used for preliminary planning purposes only. The designation is subject to change
based on verification by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (NCDWQ).
Wetland hydrology indicators (including inundation and saturated soils), hydrophytic vegetation and
hydric soils were observed adjacent to the streams that cross the site. In most areas, the wetlands are
separated from surrounding uplands by distinct topographic breaks, vegetation breaks and soil breaks.
Upland areas surrounding the wetland pocket are vegetated primarily with hardwood species. The soils
are bright and appear to be well drained to depths of at least twelve inches. The centerlines of the streams
and the wetland boundaries were flagged in the field by ECS personnel. Figure 3 shows the approximate
locations of the stream, pond and wetlands on the site. Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms
containing field observations at the locations identified on Figure 3 are included as Attachments.
Figure 3 is based solely on the field notes of ECS personnel and is intended for preliminary planning
purposes. We recommend that our flags be surveyed to determine the exact locations and extent of the
streams and wetlands on the site.
Discussion
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act regulates the discharge of dredge and fill materials into waters of the
United States (lakes, rivers, ponds, streams, etc.), including wetlands. Waters of the United States include
the territorial seas, navigable coastal and inland lakes, rivers and streams, intermittent streams, and
wetlands. Activities that could be regulated under Section 404 include placement of fill for construction
of roadways; residential, commercial or industrial structures; and the construction of water retention
ponds along tributaries. The EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers jointly administer the Section
404 program. Section 401 of the Clean Water Act grants each state the authority to approve, condition, or
deny any Federal permits that could result in a discharge to State waters.
2
7'roy Business Park - Highway 24/27 at SR 1138
Troy, North Carolina
ECS, Ltd. Project G-12562
May 22, 2006
The streams and wetlands located on the site are regulated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality. We recommend that the delineated boundaries be verified by
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. A metes and bounds survey of the jurisdictional boundaries should be
conducted after the USACE verification to determine their exact locations and extent. Upon completion, a
copy of the wetland/stream survey map should be submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for
final approval. A site/grading plan can then be developed to determine the extent of the proposed impacts
to jurisdictional waters and wetlands, if any. An attempt should be made to minimize or avoid working in
these areas, if possible.
Permits will be required prior to impacting more than 1/10 acre of wetlands or any open waters, including
perennial or intermittent streams. Mitigation and a stonnwater management plan may be a condition of
any permits issued for the site. In addition, buffers may be required adjacent to the streams, and wetlands.
For impacts to more than one-half acre of wetlands or to more than 300 linear feet of stream channel, an
individual permit (IP) may be required. An IP requires a habitat analysis, alternative site analysis, project
justification, plans to avoid and minimize impacts, and a proposed mitigation plan. Depending on the
habitat analysis and the extent of impacts, an Environmental Impact Statement may be required by the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. An 1P allows for a public comment period and may require 4 to 18
months to obtain depending on conditions arising during the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers review and
public comment period.
ECS appreciates the opportunity to provide wetland services for your project. Please contact us at (336)
856-7150 if you have questions concerning this report.
Sincerely,
ECS CAROLINAS, LLP
AV -K 4,_
Michael T. Brame
Project Scientist
Attachments: Figure 1 - Site Location Map
Figure 2 - Soil Map
Figure 3 - Stream/Wetland Location Map
Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms
ks 2« -C-'r >VU-Aoo?
Brian E. Maas, REM
Principal Scientist
y.
e
r?k ? k,M
i' { A
SOURCE: FIGURE 2
USDA SOIL SURVEY OF SOIL MAP
MONTGOMERY COUN'T'Y TROY BUSINESS CEN'T'ER
FROM GIS HIGHWAY 24/27 AT SR 113
/?p?y ??/? TROY, NORTH CAROLINA
NOT TO SCALE CAROL W
THE. STREAM/WETLAND LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE APPROXIMATE. THEY HAVE BI
THE FIELD BY ECS PERSONNEL. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE U.S ARMY CORPS OF
THEY HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED.
01 /
Le en
•? = Approximate location of stream
= Approximate location of wetland
M = Approximate location of culvert
DP- I =Approximate location of data point
SOURCE:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP AND FIELD
NOTES PREPARED BY ECS PERSONNEL
NOT TO SCALD,
D IN
AND
FIGURE 3
ff I STREAM/WETLAND LOCATION MAP
UP TROY BUSINESS CENTER
HIGHWAY 24/27 AT SR 1138
TROY, NORTii CAROLINA
y
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Troy Business Center - Highway 24/27 at SR 1138 Project No: Date: May 18, 2006
Applicant/Owner: Tritech Civil Environmental, PC County: Montgomery
Investigators: ECS, Carolinas, LLP G-12562 State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-1
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? ?Yes ® No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ® No Field Location: View Figure 3
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
Juncus sp.
Rush sp. Herb FACW
Osmunda cinnamomea
Cinnamon fern Herb FACW+
Carex sp.
Sedge sp. Herb FACW
Acer rubrum
Red maple Tree/Sap FAC

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC: 100%
(excluding FAC-) FAC Neutral:
Numeric Index:
Remarks:
The dominant vegetation is hydrophytic.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetla nd Hydrology Indicators
? Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Pri mary Indicators
? Aerial Photographs ? Inundated
? Other ® Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
? Water Marks
® No Recorded Data ? Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Sec ondary Indicators
Depth of Surface Water: 0" ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 6" ? Local Soil Survey Data
® FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 4" ? Other (Explain in Remarks)

h ydrology indicators are present.
(Wetform) Page 1 of 2
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual
Project/Site: Troy Business Center - Highway 24/27 at SR 1138 Project No: Date: May 18, 2006
Applicant/Owner: Tritech Civil Environmental, PC County: Montgomery
Investigators: ECS, Carolinas, LLP G-12562 State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-1
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Herndon silt loam
Map Symbol: 130C
Mapped Hydric Inclusion? ?Yes ® No
Drainage Class: Well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic hapludults Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type: ?Yes ®No
Profile Descri tion
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon Munsell Moist (Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc.
0-12" 2.5Y 4/1 10YR 4/6 20% Loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
® Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ®Yes ? No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ? No
Hydric Soils Present? ®yes ? No
Remarks:
The three wetland criteria are present. The sampling point is located within a wetland.
(Wetform) Page 2 of 2
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Troy Business Center - Highway 24/27 at SR 1138 Project No: Date: May 18, 2006
Applicant/Owner: Tritech Civil Environmental, PC County: Montgomery
Investigators: ECS, Carolinas, LLP G-12562 State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-2
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? ?Yes ® No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ® No Field Location: View Figure 3
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
Acer rubrum
Red maple Tree/Sap FAC
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tulip tree Tree/Sap FAC
Liquidambar styraciflua
Sweet gum Tree/Sap FAC+
Lonicera japonica
Japanese honeysuckle Vine FAC-

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC: 75%
(excluding FAC-) FAC Neutral:
Numeric Index:
Remarks:
The dominant vegetation is hydrophytic.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
? Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
? Aerial Photographs ? Inundated
? Other ? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
? Water Marks
® No Recorded Data ? Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
H
Field Observations Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators
Depth of Surface Water: 0" ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >12" ? Local Soil Survey Data
? FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: >12" ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are not present.
(Wetform) Page I of 2
' DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual
Project/Site: Troy Business Center - Highway 24/27 at SR 1138 Project No: Date: May 18, 2006
Applicant/Owner: Tritech Civil Environmental, PC County: Montgomery
Investigators: ECS, Carolinas, LLP G-12562 State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-2
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Herndon silt loam
Map Symbol: 130C Mapped Hydric Inclusion? ?Yes ® No
Drainage Class: Well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic hapludults Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type: ®Yes ? No
Profile Descri tion
Depth Matrix Z Mottle Color Mottle
(inches) Horizon Mansell
I (Mansell Moist Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc.
0-12" 7.5YR 4/6 0% Loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon
? Sulfidic Odor
? Aquic Moisture Regime
? Reducing Conditions ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are not present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ?Yes ® No
Hydric Soils Present? ?yes ®No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology and hydric soil indicators are not present. The sampling point is not located within a wetland.
(Wetform) Page 2 of 2
EF
?3 LLP
c.e.rio?? nosas
ECS CAROLINAS, LLP
Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental
May 22, 2006
Mr. Larry Pearce
Tritech Civil Environmental, PC
401 Commerce Place
Asheboro, NC 27203
Reference: Report of Jurisdictional Waters/Wetland Delineation
Troy Business Center
Highway 24/27 @ SR 1138 JUL 6 2006
Troy, North Carolina DENR - WATER
ECS Project G-12562 WEnAW6jANDS QUALITY
TpRA6ATERBRANDH
Dear Mr. Pearce:
ECS Carolinas, LLP (ECS) is pleased to submit this report of the jurisdictional waters/wetland
delineation for the site located north of the intersection of Highway 24/27 and SR 1138 in Troy, North
Carolina. This report summarizes our findings for the site.
Background
ECS was contracted to identify the locations of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, for the above
referenced site. The site contains a business park and undeveloped, wooded land.
Wetlands are defined by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the United States Environmental
Protection Agency as "those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a
frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances, do support a prevalence of
vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions." In order for an area to be classified as
wetland, hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology indicators must be present.
Literature Review
We have reviewed the USGS Topographic Map, the Soil Survey of Montgomery County and the
Geologic Map of North Carolina to obtain information regarding the site.
The USGS Topographic Map (Figure 1) indicates that two unnamed tributaries to Werner Creek
cross the site. Surface drainage appears to be toward the unnamed tributaries to Werner Creek across
the site.
The USDA Soil Survey of Montgomery County (Figure 2) shows unnamed tributaries to Werner
Creek crossing the site. Soils on the site are mapped as Herndon silt loam (130B and 130C). The
Herndon series consists of well drained, moderately permeable soils that occur on gently sloping to
moderately steep Piedmont uplands. The Herndon series is not included on the Hydric Soils List for
Montgomery County.
4811 Koger Boulevard • Greensboro, NC 27407 • [phone] • Fax [phone]
Troy Business Park - Highway 24127 at SR 1138
Troy, North Carolina
ECS, Ltd. Project G-12562
May 22, 2006
The Geologic Map of North Carolina indicates that the site is located in the Carolina Slate Belt of the
Piedmont Physiographic Province. The soils encountered in this area are the residual product of in-
place chemical weathering of rock presently underlying the site. In general, shallow unconfined
groundwater movement within the overlying soils is controlled largely by topographic gradients.
Recharge occurs primarily by infiltration along higher elevations and typically discharges into
streams or other surface water bodies. The elevation of the shallow water table is transient and can
vary greatly with seasonal fluctuations in precipitation. Movement in this water table is generally
from higher to lower elevations. As such, shallow groundwater would be expected to flow beneath
the site toward the unnamed tributaries to Werner Creek.
Site Reconnaissance
ECS personnel conducted the site reconnaissance on May 12, 2006. The site is located north of the
intersection of Highway 24/27 and SR 1138 in Troy, North Carolina. The site contains a business park
and undeveloped, wooded land.
During our reconnaissance, we observed the site for evidence of stream channels, wetlands and ponds.
Two streams cross the site. The streams have defined beds and banks, meanders and contained flowing
water at the time of our reconnaissance. Crayfish, frogs, salamanders and fish (minnows) were observed
in the streams. It is our opinion that the stream is perennial. The stream designation is based on our
opinion and should be used for preliminary planning purposes only. The designation is subject to change
based on verification by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (NCDWQ).
Wetland hydrology indicators (including inundation and saturated soils), hydrophytic vegetation and
hydric soils were observed adjacent to the streams that cross the site. In most areas, the wetlands are
separated from surrounding uplands by distinct topographic breaks, vegetation breaks and soil breaks.
Upland areas surrounding the wetland pocket are vegetated primarily with hardwood species. The soils
are bright and appear to be well drained to depths of at least twelve inches. The centerlines of the streams
and the wetland boundaries were flagged in the field by ECS personnel. Figure 3 shows the approximate
locations of the stream, pond and wetlands on the site. Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms
containing field observations at the locations identified on Figure 3 are included as Attachments.
Figure 3 is based solely on the field notes of ECS personnel and is intended for preliminary planning
purposes. We recommend that our flags be surveyed to determine the exact locations and extent of the
streams and wetlands on the site.
Discussion
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act regulates the discharge of dredge and fill materials into waters of the
United States (lakes, rivers, ponds, streams, etc.), including wetlands. Waters of the United States include
the territorial seas, navigable coastal and inland lakes, rivers and streams, intermittent streams, and
wetlands. Activities that could be regulated under Section 404 include placement of fill for construction
of roadways; residential, commercial or industrial structures; and the construction of water retention
ponds along tributaries. The EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers jointly administer the Section
404 program. Section 401 of the Clean Water Act grants each state the authority to approve, condition, or
deny any Federal permits that could result in a discharge to State waters.
2
Troy Business Park - Highway 24127 at SR 1138
Troy, North Carolina
ECS, Ltd. Project G-12562
May 22, 2006
The streams and wetlands located on the site are regulated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality. We recommend that the delineated boundaries be verified by
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. A metes and bounds survey of the jurisdictional boundaries should be
conducted after the USACE verification to determine their exact locations and extent. Upon completion, a
copy of the wetland/stream survey map should be submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for
final approval. A site/grading plan can then be developed to determine the extent of the proposed impacts
to jurisdictional waters and wetlands, if any. An attempt should be made to minimize or avoid working in
these areas, if possible.
Permits will be required prior to impacting more than 1/10 acre of wetlands or any open waters, including
perennial or intermittent streams. Mitigation and a stormwater management plan may be a condition of
any permits issued for the site. In addition, buffers may be required adjacent to the streams, and wetlands.
For impacts to more than one-half acre of wetlands or to more than 300 linear feet of stream channel, an
individual permit (IP) may be required. An IP requires a habitat analysis, alternative site analysis, project
justification, plans to avoid and minimize impacts, and a proposed mitigation plan. Depending on the
habitat analysis and the extent of impacts, an Environmental Impact Statement may be required by the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. An IP allows for a public comment period and may require 4 to 18
months to obtain depending on conditions arising during the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers review and
public comment period.
ECS appreciates the opportunity to provide wetland services for your project. Please contact us at (336)
856-7150 if you have questions concerning this report.
Sincerely,
ECS CAROLINAS, LLP
Michael T. Brame
Project Scientist
Brian E. Maas, REM
Principal Scientist
Attachments: Figure 1 - Site Location Map
Figure 2 - Soil Map
Figure 3 - Stream/Wetland Location Map
Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms
"+_ `r''� j r ..:.a ✓ J �..:,%�, � ./� r f ` w� �r� 11 .r�.r 1 f .. 1 r 1 ,t ` � � ::'Ir i
( .� • rr�� . r 874 '1 l,� r- r. � '� '� C/,�.+'+,. _� r/ w.,._ ' f\ s. �,� �j / >( �'
j*j � � ` t.5 - �. >,�``' �, f .r , t � i ", � �� (� cj_.`�. S � ' _...{a .✓ if I !N ! l ,. \ � '.�n 1�3`� rpt
',• � ' ,'� ' __� (,,� _ � _1���. `'',,`� ` � � Z�"''�'•«)I �. 'L ,j'' /; • � ti's
TV
I �A'11-
—
.1"I.,
i ..�,�.#, � j. 1 (.�~ ,• ....�'w � ' . , i �; �M \„� mx,--
-..' i i .: �' „f �(''� t� rv;-�L� � .,:;, � ;\�-Y t �fi .r � ..1�5,.w 1.�..✓., � IFw.1'..
> r 1
r
�+ � � �.,.'.'r., ..�� �,. t u, .rt �' "'i} tij(�E., 4� �`�� �fJ� ' -�.. ��•,,,.. � }! t i'F l
t� �� M �'�.,-" (' �,4.flrct l� , '�•' -� .7 `�7 fry � ..� �l l
u
fo
41
j 2N
91
x`4",4'
.., , ; . •` i - -v j .` +l/i`` J '-!/. � �%! , , r r . Y '�% t.��,. �1 is � r r �. !
' �r XA\'(1
SS
Yti .
N
rr SOURCE: FIGURE I
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP SITE LOCATION MAP
TROY, NC QUADRANGLE TROY BUSINESS CENTER
DATED 1994 HIGHWAY 24/27 AT SR 1138
TROY, NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE: V'= 2,000'
ARMI W ECS PROJECT G-12562

THE STREAM/WETLAND LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THIS MAP
THE FIELD BY ECS PERSONNEL. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN VEI
THEY HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED.
' /
Legend
• = Approximate location of stream
= Approximate location of wetland
Approximate location of culvert
DP-1 =Approximate location of data point
SOURCE:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP AND FIELD
NOTES PREPARED BY ECS PERSONNEL
NOT TO SCALE
APPROXIMATE. THEY HAVI
D BY THE U.S ARMY CORPS
IN
FIGURE 3
STREAM/WETLAND LOCATION MAP
wupp TROY BUSINESS CENTER
HIGHWAY 24/27 AT SR 1138
?p?y ??/??+ TROY, NORTH CAROLINA
CA?OLI1 W''k7

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual
Project/Site: Troy Business Center - Highway 24/27 at SR 1138 Project No: Date: May 18, 2006
Applicant/Owner: Tritech Civil Environmental, PC County: Montgomery
Investigators: ECS, Carolinas, LLP G-12562 State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-1
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? ?Yes ® No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ® No Field Location: View Figure 3
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
Juncus sp.
Rush sp. Herb FACW
Osmunda cinnamomea
Cinnamon fern Herb FACW+
Carex sp.
Sedge sp. Herb FACW
Acer rubrum
Red maple Tree/Sap FAC

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC: 100%
(excluding FAC-) FAC Neutral:
Numeric Index:
Remarks:
The dominant vegetation is hydrophytic.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
? Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
? Aerial Photographs ? Inundated
? Other ® Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
? Water Marks
® No Recorded Data ? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
Field Observations ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators
Depth of Surface Water: 0" ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
? Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 6" ? Local Soil Survey Data
® FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 4" ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are present.
(Wetform) Page 1 of 2
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual
Project/Site: Troy Business Center - Highway 24/27 at SR 1138 Project No: Date: May 18, 2006
Applicant/Owner: Tritech Civil Environmental, PC County: Montgomery
Investigators: ECS, Carolinas, LLP G-12562 State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-1
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Herndon silt loam
Map Symbol: 130C
Mapped Hydric Inclusion? ?Yes ® No
Drainage Class: Well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic hapludults Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type: ?Yes ® No
Profile Descri tion
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
inches Horizon Munsell Moist (Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc.
0-12" 2.5Y 4/1 10YR 4/6 20% Loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
® Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ®Yes ? No
Hydric Soils Present? 11
knffes 71 ? No
Remarks:
The three wetland criteria are present. The sampling point is located within a wetland.
(Wetform) Page 2 of 2
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Troy Business Center - Highway 24/27 at SR 1138 Project No: Date: May 18, 2006
Applicant/Owner: Tritech Civil Environmental, PC County: Montgomery
Investigators: ECS, Carolinas, LLP G-12562 State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-2
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? ?Yes ® No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ® No Field Location: View Figure 3
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
Acer rubrum
Red maple Tree/Sap FAC
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tulip tree Tree/Sap FAC
Liquidambar styraciflua
Sweet gum Tree/Sap FAC+
Lonicera japonica
Japanese honeysuckle Vine FAC-

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC: 75%
(excluding FAC-) FAC Neutral:
Numeric Index:
Remarks:
The dominant vegetation is hydrophytic.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
? Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
? Aerial Photographs ? Inundated
? Other ? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
? Water Marks
® No Recorded Data ? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
Field Observations ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators
Depth of Surface Water: 0" ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
? Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >12" ? Local Soil Survey Data
? FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: >12" ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are not present.
(Wetform) Page I of 2
` DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual
Project/Site: Troy Business Center - Highway 24/27 at SR 1138 Project No: Date: May 18, 2006
Applicant/Owner: Tritech Civil Environmental, PC County: Montgomery
Investigators: ECS, Carolinas, LLP G-12562 State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-2
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Herndon silt loam
Map Symbol: 130C Mapped Hydric Inclusion? ?Yes ® No
Drainage Class: Well drained Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type: ®Yes ? No
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic hapludults
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
inches Horizon Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc.
0-12" 7.5YR 4/6 0% Loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are not present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? NYes ® No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? ?Yes ® No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology and hydric soil indicators are not present. The sampling point is not located within a wetland.
(Wetform) Page 2 of 2
;,:. " 105'.:.
TRITECH \
Tritech Civil Environmental, PC
W A 1 I- F A n/ A 1- F: W A I I-- Fi E-- N (J ! N{=. F R`
401 Commerce Place • Asheboro, North Carolina 27203 • [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Post Office Box 4127 • Asheboro, North Carolina 27204 • [phone]
NC Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality 401 Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Attention: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Dear Ms. Karoly:
April 5, 2006

Subject: Troy Business Center Access Road
On behalf of the Town of Troy, we have enclosed a check for $200.00 and seven copies of a
preconstruction notification (PCN) application form that replaces the application previously
submitted (DWQ no. 20060306) by Myrick Construction Company, Inc. In addition to
changing the applicant, the PCN has been modified to address issues raised in your March 6,
2006 letter to Myrick and discussions with Mr. Ken Averitte in the Fayetteville office. Storm
water controls, water quality impacts, and cumulative impacts are discussed in this letter. This
additional information constitutes a brief "quantitative" analysis as required in the PCN and by
applicable policies and regulations in an effort to address items XI and XIV in the PCN.
The Troy Business Center Site, generally in the shape of a triangle, is bordered on two sides by
NC Highway 24/27 and NCSR 1138 (Dairy Road). The overall Troy Business Center Site
consists of approximately 57 acres, of which approximately 25 acres is either within utility
easements or highway rights-of-way or has been deeded to individual property owners. Most
of the Troy Business Center Site can be accessed from Business Center Drive, previously
constructed through the site. As indicated in the PCN, the current project involves relocating
and paving an existing unimproved road crossing an unnamed tributary of Warner Creek. The
purpose for this road is to provide vehicular (large truck) access to approximately 20% of the
site to facilitate further commercial development. The Town of Troy will finance the access
road improvements.
As indicated above, commercial development of about 20% of the site will be facilitated by the
construction of the access road across the unnamed tributary of Warner Creek. The percent
impervious surface in the Troy Business Center Site is currently much less than 30%
(Nationwide Permit 14 General Certification WQC#3404, item 6). However, it is anticipated
that the percent impervious surface at "build-out" will be comparable to that in a typical
business park, or about 50-70%. It is our understanding from your letter and discussions with
Mr. Averitte that the Town of Troy must develop a storm water management plan for thej
Business Center Site__ Stric compliance with certain conditions of WQC#3404 may be j
problematic because of diverse ownership of parcels within the site, topography, existing
development, and other factors. There are several references in WQC#3404 to approval of
ite-specific conditions and structural storm water practices. Based on the PCN and
upplemental information, we would appreciate additional guidance from the 401 Unit
P:\06059-06\4011ettendoc
Tritech Civil Environmental, PC
regarding these issues prior to formulating the required storm water management plan for the
Business Center Site. This guidance would include the necessity, if any, for vegetative buffers
and further characterization of the wetlands on the site.
The impact to existing wetlands due to the access road construction is identified in the PCN.
Also as indicated in the PCN and plans, this impact will be mitigated somewhat by removal of
a portion of the existing roadbed and culvert and limited stream restoration. An approved
erosion control plan will be on file with the Division of Land Resources (DLR) for construction
of the access road. The PCN has been submitted concurrently to the Corps of Engineers to
assure that their conditions have been achieved with the modified plans.
Existing uses of surface waters are not anticipated to be impacted by additional development
within the Business Center Site due to existing regulatory programs. The site is drained by
unnamed tributaries of Warner Creek, classified "C" by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ).
Warner Creek flows into Rocky Creek, classified "C-HQW" by the DWQ. We are not aware
of any impaired waters downstream of the site. The confluence of Warner Creek with Rocky
Creek is more than two miles downstream of the Business Center Site. Therefore, special
sediment and erosion control practices required for HQW streams would not normally apply to
the site. However, sediment and erosion control practices equal to or exceeding those required
by the DLR will be enforced within the Business Center Site.
Although a wetlands survey has not been completed of the entire site, development of the
remainder of the Business Center Site should not require additional stream crossings for access
roads. There is an existing roadbed and culvert in the northwestern portion of the site upstream
of this project. The future status of this existing crossing has not been established, nor has it
been established that additional "wetlands" exist along the drainage pathway.
A map of the Business Center Site has been included in the submittal to facilitate your review
of this information. Please contact me (336-498-1060) or Gray Walls with the Town of Troy
(910-572-3661) if you have questions regarding this submittal.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this request.
Very truly yours, _
`t1 / _,'A
Tritech Civil Environmental, PCp,;,
Larry Pearce, P.E.
Cc: Gray Walls, Town of Troy w/enclosures
Brad Shaver, Corps of Engineers w/enclosures
Steve Cook, Land Quality Section w/enclosures
P:\06059-06\4011etter.doe

Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. Y O Lo - O 3 O to
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Appltcaote- or "NSA".)
I, Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
X Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
X 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), qr??; -, d
H. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Town of Troy
Mailing Address: 315 North Main Street
Troy North Carolina 27371
Telephone Number: 910-572-3661 Fax Number: 910-572-3663
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a" Vicinity-, nip ; Nearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Troy Business Center Access Road Relocation
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Montgomery Nearest Town: Troy
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Troy Business Center Site
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): take NC 24/27 west
from Town of Troy to Business Center Drive (on right), turn right onto Business Center
Drive, access road on right
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35°20'10" ON 79°55'50" °W
6. Property size (acres):
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Warner Creek
8. River Basin: Yadkin River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/admin/mgps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Existing road with 48" CMP culvert will be relocated to
provide better alignment for truck traffic into industrial park. Land is partially wooded and
rolling terrain. Land use is commercial and industrial.
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Existing
access road will be relocated existing 48" CMP will be removed and new 48" RCP will be
placed under new access road. The channel downstream of the new access road will be
restored with removal of existing road bed.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:Existing road with 48" CMP culvert will be
relocated to provide better alignment for truck traffic into business center.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. DWQ no. 20060306 (withdrawn 3/06)
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The impacts will include
approximately 80 linear feet of perennial stream that will be piped underneath the new road,
mitigated by the restoration of the stream with the removal of the existing roadbed and 48"
Page 7 of 12
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year
Floodplain Nearest
Stream Impact
(acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) ( es/no) (linear feet)
Fill for access road and
1 culvert in stream Forested yes 0 0.03
underneath access road

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.03
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: < 0.1 acre
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
1 UT to Warner Creek New Culvert P 33 0.001

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 33 0.001
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)
NA

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Page 8 of 12
Stream Impact (acres): 0.001
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.03
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.031
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 33
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes X No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
NA
Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Design has been modified
from that previously submitted in that the paved access road has been narrowed from 30 feet to
24 feet and the shoulders have been narrowed to 4 feet. This will enable removal of
approximately 10 feet of the existing culvert previously left in the project.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
httl)://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/newetlands/stringide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Restore approximately 10' of existing stream by removing existing CMP and restoring
stream channel to approximately pre-access road conditions.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes X No ?
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No X
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No El
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No X
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Impact Required
Zone* r Multiplier AA;+.'-+,,,.,
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 213 .0242 or .0244, or .0260. NA
Page 11 of 12
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Town of Troy will require each parcel owner
to institute engineered stormwater controls as required by tpplicable regulatory authority;
additional information is attached to this application
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater will be discharged into the Troy wastewater collection system
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No X
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No ?
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes X No ?
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
NA
Applicant/Agent's Signature ' /Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
i
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. ya. E) to - CO D Lo
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I, Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
X Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
X 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
p°
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Town of Troy
Mailing Address: 315 North Main Street
Troy North Carolina 27371
Telephone Number: 910-572-3661 Fax Number: 910-572-36
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach ,a vfEinhy slap cf? rly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Troy Business Center Access Road Relocation
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only)
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
NA
4. Location
County: Montgomery Nearest Town: Troy
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Troy Business Center Site
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): take NC 24/27 west
from Town of Troy to Business Center Drive (on right), turn right onto Business Center
Drive, access road on right
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35°20'10" ON 79°55'50" °W
6. Property size (acres):
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Warner Creek
8. River Basin: Yadkin River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Existing road with 48" CMP culvert will be relocated to
provide better alignment for truck traffic into industrial park. Land is partially wooded and
rolling terrain. Land use is commercial and industrial.
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Existing
access road will be relocated existing 48" CMP will be removed and new 48" RCP will be
placed under new access road. The channel downstream of the new access road will be
restored with removal of existing road bed.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:Existing road with 48" CMP culvert will be
relocated to provide better alignment for truck traffic into business center.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. DWQ no. 20060306 (withdrawn 3/06)
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
None
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The impacts will include
approximately 80 linear feet of perennial stream that will be piped underneath the new road
mitigated by the restoration of the stream with the removal of the existing roadbed and 48"
Page 7 of 12
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year
Floodplain Nearest
Stream Impact
(acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) (yes/no) (linear feet)
Fill for access road and
1 culvert in stream Forested yes 0 0.03
underneath access road

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.03
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: < 0.1 acre
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Intermittent. Perennial Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
1 UT to Warner Creek New Culvert P 33 0.001

I I I _ -
I Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 33
+ 0.001
Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)
NA

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Page 8 of 12

Stream Impact (acres): 0.001
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.03
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.031
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 33
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes X No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Expected pond surface area:
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Design has been modified
from that previously submitted in that the paved access road has been narrowed from 30 feet to
24 feet and the shoulders have been narrowed to 4 feet. This will enable removal of
gproximately 10 feet of the existing culvert previously left in the project.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
Page 9 of 12
w
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
httl)://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Restore approximately 10' of existing stream by removing existing CMP and restoring
stream channel to approximately pre-access road conditions.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wry/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes X No ?
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No X
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No X
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multi Required
pTier
1 I 13 (2 for Catawba)
1 2 1.5
Total I I I I
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 213 .0242 or .0244, or .0260. NA
Page 11 of 12
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Town of Troy will require each parcel owner
to institute engineered stormwater controls as required by he applicable regulatory authority;
additional information is attached to this application
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater will be discharged into the Troy wastewater collection system
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No X
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No ?
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes X No ?
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Applicant/Agent's Signature '/Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
IL
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. V b to ` 0 3 0 Lc
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "loot Appncanre ' or °N/A°.)
I, Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
X Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
X 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Informations'', '
1. Owner/Applicant Information i y ? i, u
Name: Town of Troy
Mailing Address: 315 North Main Street
Troy North Carolina 27371
Telephone Number: 910-572-3661 Fax Number: 910-572-3663
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Page 5 of 12
s
III. Project Information
Attach t Aricinity map ?fearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Troy Business Center Access Road Relocation
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax
4. Location
County: Montgomery Nearest Town: Troy
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Troy Business Center Site
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): take NC 24/27 west
from Town of Troy to Business Center Drive (on right), turn right onto Business Center
Drive, access road on right
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35°20'10" ON 79°55'50" °W
6. Property size (acres):
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Warner Creek
8. River Basin: Yadkin River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Existing road with 48" CMP culvert will be relocated to
provide better alignment for truck traffic into industrial park. Land is partially wooded and
rolling terrain. Land use is commercial and industrial.
Page 6 of 12
%
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Existing
access road will be relocated existing 48" CMP will be removed, and new 48" RCP will be
placed under new access road. The channel downstream of the new access road will be
restored with removal of existing road bed.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:Existing road with 48" CMP culvert will be
relocated to provide better alignment for truck traffic into business center.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. DWQ no. 20060306 (withdrawn 3/06)
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The impacts will include
approximately 80 linear feet of perennial stream that will be piped underneath the new road,
mitigated by the restoration of the stream with the removal of the existing roadbed and 48"
culvert.
Page 7 of 12
0
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year
Floodplain Nearest
Stream Impact
(acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) (yes/no) (linear feet)
Fill for access road and
1 culvert in stream Forested yes 0 0.03
underneath access road

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.03
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: < 0.1 acre
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial Intermittent?
? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
1 UT to Warner Creek New Culvert P 33 0.001

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 33 0.001
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)
NA

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Page 8of12

Stream Impact (acres): 0.001
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.03
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.031
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 33
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes X No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Design has been modified
from that previously submitted in that the raved access road has been narrowed from 30 feet to
24 feet, and the shoulders have been narrowed to 4 feet. This will enable removal of
approximately 10 feet of the existing culvert previously left in the project.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12

USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnngide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Restore approximately 10' of existing stream by removing existing CMP and restoring
stream channel to approximately pre-access road conditions.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index,htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Page 10 of 12
..
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes X No ?
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No X
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No X
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(souare feet) Mitigation
I 1 I 13 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total I I I
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel, Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 213 .0242 or .0244, or .0260. NA
Page 11 of 12
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Town of Troy will require each parcel owner
to institute engineered stormwater controls as required by tpplicable regulatory authority
additional information is attached to this application
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater will be discharged into the Troy wastewater collection system
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No X
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No ?
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes X No ?
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
httL://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Applicant/Agent's Signature "/Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. y ?, O 6 - D,3 0 to
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
X Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
X 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP14
If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details?k_here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Town of Troy t?_A. ,,,; F, f R r l?
Mailing Address: 315 North Main Street
Troy, North Carolina 27371
Telephone Number: 910-572-3661 Fax Number: 910-572-3663
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach ":a Mdinity.' n1ap ??tearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Troy Business Center Access Road Relocation
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Montgomery Nearest Town: Troy
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Troy Business Center Site
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): take NC 24/27 west
from Town of Troy to Business Center Drive (on right), turn right onto Business Center
Drive, access road on right
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35°20'10" ON 79°55'50" °W
6. Property size (acres):
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Warner Creek
8. River Basin: Yadkin River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Existing road with 48" CMP culvert will be relocated to
provide better alignment for truck traffic into industrial park. Land is partially wooded and
rolling terrain. Land use is commercial and industrial.
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Existing
access road will be relocated existing 48" CMP will be removed and new 48" RCP will be
placed under new access road The channel downstream of the new access road will be
restored with removal of existing road bed.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:Existing road with 48" CMP culvert will be
relocated to provide better alignment for truck traffic into business center.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. DWQ no. 20060306 (withdrawn 3/06)
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
None
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The impacts will include
approximately 80 linear feet of perennial stream that will be piped underneath the new road,
mitigated by the restoration of the stream with the removal of the existing roadbed and 48"
culvert.
Page 7 of 12
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
( es/no) (linear feet)
Fill for access road and
1 culvert in stream Forested yes 0 0.03
underneath access road

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.03
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: < 0.1 acre
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
1 UT to Warner Creek New Culvert P 33 0.001

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 33 0.001
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)
NA

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Page 8of12
Stream Impact (acres): 0.001
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.03
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.031
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 33
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes X No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:-
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Design has been modified
from that previously submitted in that the paved access road has been narrowed from 30 feet to
24 feet and the shoulders have been narrowed to 4 feet. This will enable removal of
approximately 10 feet of the existing culvert previously left in the project.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
trout pond,
Page 9 of 12
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Restore approximately 10' of existing stream by removing existing CMP and restoring
stream channel to approximately pre-access road conditions.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/wry/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes X No ?
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No X
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No X
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(sauare feet) Mitigation
I 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone I.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. NA
Page I I of 12
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Town of Troy will require each parcel owner
to institute engineered stormwater controls as required by the applicable regulatory authority
additional information is attached to this application
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater will be discharged into the Troy wastewater collection system
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No X
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No ?
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes X No ?
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
NA
Applicant/Agent's Signature `4)afe
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
Troy Business Center
Subject: Troy Business Center
From: "Larry Wayne Pearce" <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 11:53:00 -0400
To: <[e-mail]>
CC: "Gray Walls \(E-mail\)" <[e-mail]>, "Michael Brame \(E-mail\)"
<[e-mail]>, "David Brame \(E-mail\)" <[e-mail]>
Attached are drawings prepared based on field surveys of the wetland
delineation performed by ECS Carolinas, LLP and verified by the Corps of
Engineers. Our surveying manager is out of the office until Monday, and I
will mail five copies of the signed and sealed drawings to you when he
returns. In the meantime, I have mailed five copies of the wetland
delineation report prepared by ECS. It is my understanding that the Corps
of Engineers agreed with the wetland delineation in total.
Larry Pearce
Content-Type: application/pdf
TROY-BP-SHT 1.PDF
Content-Encoding: base64
,TROY-BP-SHT 2.PDF Content-Type: application/pdf
Content-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: application/pdf
.TROY-BP-SHT 3.PDF
Content-Encoding: base64
TROY-BP-SHT 4.PDF Content-Type: application/pdf
'
Content-Encoding: base64
TROY-BP-SHT S.PDF Content-Type: application/pdf
Content-Encoding: base64
TROY-BP-SHT 6.PDF Content-Type: application/pdf
'.
Content-Encoding: base64
1 of 2 7/5/2006 5:03 PM

[I Complete items 1, 2, and 3. /also complete
ftem 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
¦ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
Article Addressed to:
Town of Troy
315 North Main Street.
Troy,NC 27371
DWQ# 06-0306-Montgomery

13 Agent
? Addressee
B. R by (Printed Name) Date of Delivery
I -
D. Is delivery address different from item 11 Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ? No
I
3. ,firvice Type
Cat W Mail ? Express Mail
Registered Return Receipt for Merchandise
P
? Insured Mail
C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ? Yes
I,
2. ArtWile
cle
ffimnsfer from uswvADe 7005 1160 0000 9954 9635
i.
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-15Q
UNITED STATES Paste 5 a ?;aa{`} 4... FF-stage il
n7?.ks,• FFeE3gn '
r { {t,,? {{ USPySgyp?
1'41. 1'yi!1?1 (.J Liu ..?,?7
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight/Express Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
?F '? t'_,C„>C„?:;r ?4lilllii El}11}Ili}Itl?il?}!Il111?fli?iilli {Itt7!12iifll2il?t'

¦ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
¦ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
11. Article Addressed to:
Town of Troy
315 North Main Street
Troy,NC 27371
DWQ# 06-0306 Ver.2-Montgomery

A. o"Ignature
X Q Agent
Addressee
4 g-Received MA PIM%--I Data efj-
D. Is deliveryladh different from item 1? ? Yes
If YES, eM delivery address below: ? No
3. Service Type
JO Certified Mail ? Express Mail
? Registered 10 Retum Receipt for Merchandise
? Insured Mail ? C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? Orba Fee) ? Yes
2. Article Number
Mansfer from service fabe# ?005 1160 0000 9954 6962
Ps Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt
102595-02-M-1540
UNITED STATES PO TP 8 5K T ,.TR1AD k
t?I L.n v?5i l4?.f. ?. +
.:;I 'W L.<Y r- - t;
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 I°n its box •
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight/Express Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
F.+3 ? c?b3 11f?111!lt?ll?i!??!Ittl!!?Fl1[}!l?l?1111!![i'f Itl?i?13!!1l?1l1
V z
DWQ# 0 (.-b 3 06 Date T- 2-0' C* Who Reviewed:
Plan Detail Incomplete
S
Please provide a location map for the project.
? Please show all stream impacts including all fill slopes, dissipaters, and bank stabilizaGN ?n the site pl
? Please show all wetland impacts including fill slopes on the site plan.
? Please indicate all buff Impacts on the site plan., n J? }
Please indicate proposed *layout as overlays on the site plan.
? Please indicate the location of the protected buffers as overlays on the site plan.
Please locate all isolated or non-isolated wetlands, streams and other waters of the State as overlays on the site plan,
? Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage.
? Please locate any planned sewer lines on the site plan.
V U/, lease provide the location of any proposed stormwater management practices as required by GC
lease provide detail for the stormwater management practices as required by GC I -(.
Please specify the percent of project imperviousness area based on the estimated built-out conditions.
Please indicate all stormwater outfalls on the site plan.
? Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan.
? Please indicate whether or not the proposed impacts already been conducted.
Avoidance and/or Minimization Not Provided
l.?J?i'i)
WLVJ

? The labeled as on the plans does not appear to be necessary. Please eliminate the or provide additional
information as to why it is necessary for this project.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the
. Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to minimize the impacts to the
. Please revise the plans to minimize the impacts.
? The stormwater discharges at the location on the plans labeled will not provide diffuse flow through the buffer because
. Please revise the plans and provide calculations to show that diffuse flow will be achieved through the entire buffer. If it
is not possible to achieve diffuse flow through the entire buffer then it may be necessary to provide stormwater management
practices that remove nutrients before the stormwater can be discharged through the buffer.
Other
? The application fee was insufficient because over 150 feet of stream and/or over 1 acre of wetland impacts were requested. Please
provide $ . This additional fee must be received before your application can be reviewed.
Please complete Section(s on the application. ?1 Z
? Please provide a signed copy of the application. !--
? Please provide copies of the application, __ copies of the site plans and other supporting information.
? Please submit electronic CAD files showing _ via email to [e-mail] and CD:
Mitigation
? of compensatory mitigation is required for this project. Please provide a compensatory mitigation plan. The
plan must conform to the requirements in 15 A NCAC 2H.0500 and must be appropriate to the type of impacts proposed.
? Please indicate which 404 Permit the USACE would use to authorize this project.
i
i
~ Thomas H. Lemons & wife, ~ Donno H. Lemons
I~ , ~ Deed Book 172 Poge 647
I, ~I
SITE i ~ John C King, Jr. i Deed Book 193 Page 3 I
~ ~ I Deed Book 230 Poge 927 I
~1,~ i l i ' I "Z~' I Ulas P. Bailey, Jr. I I I
~ and wife, I
NTS ~ ~ , Norma M. Bailey ~ I Deed Book 277 I Found: 3/4" ~ Iron Pipe °t I
VICINITY MAP ~ ~ Poge 814 ~ pine stump - _ - - _ -
~ ~ I ~ , I
~ ~ I Set: 3/4" FT ~ nce Iron Rebar 590.33 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s
~ I ~r• ~ E i 124 00 i T Total Dista i Found: 3/4" N gE ~ ~ \ ~ A S~~ ~ ~ Set: 3/4" ~ ~V ~ ~ 0 ~ S~\~~eg
_ ~ ' \ , i i Iron Pipe ~ ~ A ~ g, Iron Rebor Jeffre P. Haywood & wife, ~ ~ F 13.44 FT from ~ V ~ ~ ~ ` \ ~ 7 Kathy R. Haywood
Found: 3/4" ~,3i67 FT ~ ~ ~ r?I'n3" F 463.4' FT Total Distance ~ ~ ~ I I Iron Pie N ~ - P ~ A ~ corner in branch ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " Deed Book 391 Page 476
?551 fT V1(L~4' f1 Measured ~ ~ A Set: oint in center - 334 4'a FT ~ ~ 580 / p ~ ~ ~~3/4" Iron ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ Set: 7/8 ~t. , / , ~ ~ ~ ~ Uq , \ ~ ' Iron Reb°r q /
~ ~ ~ ~ V l i ~ / i" of road ~ 1 ~ \ ~ ,Rebar O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ll 4 E \ V~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~q ;
i ~ ~ i / ~ 1.14 800 q5 F ~ _ ~ / ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r i~ NORTN ~ ` ~ r0t°r
~ y ~ _ - / - s X12 ors ~ CAROLINA ~ U 1 \ t0nce . Z ~ , ~
I o ~ ~ ~ ~y ~ - - ; t ~ - _ _ \ \ ~ - _ i ~ ~ l \a ~ , i ~ - ~ i GRID NORTH
~ ~ \ - - ~ \ \ \ _ ~ 1 ~ _ - / ~ i-I0 i ~ / ~ NAD 63 y i ~ L_ ~ Found: ~ ~
fire a i i j ~ LS ~ Concrete
hydrant ! ! 570 , i 1 Monument ~ ~ l'n ~ ~ i
/ ~ n. j ~ ~ _ - _ . ~ i ~ ~ v A tS` ~ .P ~ 57 ~ , 8~ ~ ~ . ~
~ ~ ~ ~ rie Custom McDwork, LLC « ~ ~ ~ j _ , i war ~ ~ - - ~ Deed Book 494 i ~ ~ ~ - d ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ 5` ~ ~ Thomas J. Fields & wife, ~ ~ , Measured
a• Poge 306 % ~ / , ~ ~ _~~t°° ~ ~ ~ \ R~ , o ~ ~ i~ ~ point in center / ~ ~ - _ ~ i B°rboro W. Fields o L6 _ / of road ~ /
/ ~ ~ f 5 ~ A r _ A es 3.0 ~ 0 c i o~` ~ - ~ - i i i' ~ ' % F~ ' ~ ~ ~ do 25 ~ Deed Book 426 Poge 269 7 , , ' - ~ ~ ~ 252 Acres t ' '
; i ~ <e .i _ ~ ~ ~ / ~ , : --L--~~ ~ / ~ ~ L4 ~7 i ~ ~ ' /
- _ - D , ~ -1--~_% o ~ ~ ~y,~ ~ 5 / 6
/ _ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ Set: 3/4"lam Bearin s & Distances
_ f- ' - ~ ~ ~ - 30 0o FT i ~ ' ~ ~ i ~ - h Uwharrie Bu~7ders, LLC; ~ i ~ r /~~a _ Deed Book 494/ Iron Reb°r L I ° powe alon branch
_ / , i ~ ,i a - ~ 6.30 FT from ti po e ~a~' _ Poge 306 o, r ' LINE BEARING LENGTH corner in branch '
U ~ Tie Line ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~~`~w-,, Z ` ~ ' ~ L1 N 76'43'36" E 9.19 FT y J 7.58 Acres t ~ ~ ,~j " 5~ _ _~i ' / ~ L2 N 22'43'01" E 21.08 FT
CURVE DATA ~ 0 FT Total Distance ) gp~SO, ~ - ' S 87 2103" W 360.0 11 " E ~ , ! / ~ 550 % ,X Found: Radius = 2128.88 FT = ; 330-00 FT Set: 1~1~ g5 F l -~..°'7`L12 20 Foot per , ~ Found: 6 _ _ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ; ' L3 N 38'19'25" E 45.03 FT i i Popl°r Tree ~ _ - ~ ,
= FT ~ ~ 3 4" Iron _ _ - -ryl ~ 'i ii Poplar Arc 15.69 ~ i / Cam- --y=-- - - 0 ~ ~ - / / I i i ,i ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ ` , L4 N 66'08'58" W 40.01 FT ~ _ _ - _ _ . _ - ~ fire , N 48'26'05" W 17.19 FT
Chord Information I Set: / Rebar - ~~e~t ~ / i ~ 3/4" Iron / ~ ~ i - E 1 i / , N 04'31'17" W / i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ C 11 moose / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i i ~ r° t ~ ~ : j ~ L5 ~ ` nch S t: 3 4" 4~ ' ' L6 N 86'53'33" W 10.27 FT
Rebar 0 / - ~ ~ ~ fi ~ ~9 - `L 1s.ss Fr , ~ i 4 , \ C C_---- .~~ent Easement No. 1 _ . • , i ~ _ _ Iron Reb°r ~ L7 N 08'1711" W 80.72 FT
u u 6 - 5 - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ' LB N 14'40'00" E 19.33 FT l ~ .61 FT
, ~ ~ - %0.44 Acre t tv t - _ ~ vet Set: 7 8" Iron Reb°rs ~ ~ L9 N 08'4735" W 22 c 1 ~ ~ - ~ p wer L10 N 71'56'27" E 29.94 FT < the corners I , i "
at three of ~ ~ ~ , in Station ~ L11 N 35'39'50 W 25.32 FT f the Pum V ~ ~ „
° p 9 A ~ ~ ~ ~ / , L12 N 80'33 33 W 62.1 B FT r ~ ~6~~ i~ ~ 0.12 ACreS f ~ A Z ~ ~ ~ / / ' L13 S 64'22'30" W 18.66 FT
i . ' ~ , - - ~ ~ ~ ~i / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ " L14 N 18'26'47" E 46.25 FT
\ ~ . ~ 1 ~ ~ Set: 3/4 L15 N 46'04'57" W 15.23 FT 'i , ~ b~' ~ ~ Iron Reb°r W e 2 ~ ! - L16 N 03'33'13" W 11.41 FT
~ , i~~ ~~54~ ~ . ~ ~ O ~ e ~y , 30.00 FT from _ i~ i - A. A ~ Qo ~~c ( ~ ~ ~ _ -
_ - fight-of-Way Deed Dee ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ _ d Book 491 Poe ~ , ~ ! ' • i1 ~rC _ _ - 9 669J Set: i i ~ i Ea,; i i i . ~ ~ ~ ~ O~oc ,t` center of road i Easement No. 2' 1 ~ o ~ ~
_ _ 7/8" Iron _ - _ _ - ~ ~6°' / i~ ! ' • ~ - 0.19 Acre f - ~ ~ ~o• ~ o°' SEIPER LINE DATA
mess Center D _ Reb ~,I: r2ve _ - ~ I 'C ~ , ~ ~ ~ o- 4Y LINE BEARING DISTANCE
~ ~ s - ~ 5 ~ d ~ / ~ D~' ? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L8 N 62'40'33" W 60.61 FT
, , i I i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' W 196.86 FT : ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~a ~,~a• L9 S 81'57 43
i ~ ~ ,n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i I I ~ vb, powe ~ ; u 1 ~ ~ Rry~o,Dle ! ~ - '1 ` bCQ° '~ower ,o o~ L10 5 69'04'55' W 196.82 fT i ; ~ ` ~ o y pole A ' W 174.47 FT tic / .h Ltt N 71'42 40 ~ r
1 i ~ ~ ~ ~ 6~, ~ 1 I . A ~ ! / a~ / ` T • i ~ G°~ / ~ ~ , ~ L12 N 88'12'46' W 322.23 F
i ~ , _ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 4 ' L13 N 44'55'58' E 103.18 FT
1 i ~ J ~ j i ~ 1 \ ~ ~ Y - ~ ~ - - \ .fie ~ _ e s ~ _ ~ _ L14 N 02132iLW 14195 FT . _ _ r_ r _ y .l~°; / ' L15 N 02'34'33" W 132.96 FT
A . ~ ~ ~ ~ arc i ~ " ~`c o°~/ L16 N 52'10'87 E 119.06 FT
, % ~o° i r ~ / w~ , ~ ~ 'V'~ ~ ,
i _ ~ ~ s ~o~ ower \ ower A A,~ ,6 y ~ ~ i \ ~ 6 ~ / `
~ ~ ~ ~ ~0 ~ ~ A ~ ~i 5 = 56.61 Acres f - ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ' TOTAL ARE , i a,• ~ ~ i~ % ' Pum in Station Lot 5 \ f° s J•. ~ p- ~
~ ~ u~ \~h'~ F2 ~ ~ / ~ ~ d~ LINE BEARING DISTANCE \ ~ ~0
Committee ~ ~ _ o ~ 100 Site 5.00 Acres t w ~ ~ ~ ~1 \ of - ~ .4 ~ W _ / ~ ; ' / , U 7 S 4316'15" E 87.60 FT
~ ~ S 63.82 F T Pow ~ ~'v~ L18 S 46'43'45" W 60.00 FT ~ S P ~ ~t J~ G ~ ~ L19 N 4316'15" W 87.60 FT ~s \
Uwharrie Builders ~ i ~ 7.58 Acres t - - ~ _ I ~ Site , _ • Dow L20 N 46'43'45" E 60.00 FT
~ , ~ } Uwharrie Millworks ~ \ ~ I / ~ - i
! ~ ~ ~ ' ~ EXISTING Site 3.00 Acres t ~ ~ I J ~ ~ 'i ~ j i ~ METAL i , _ ,
- i Area within ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ BUILDING ~ / 1 \ ,
Business Center Dr. 2.42 Acre t ~ j - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Set: 3/4"
Area within ~ iD ~ - _ A`~ A / , D ~ ~ Iron Reb°r / ~
24 & 27 0.66 Acre f ~ ~ ~ A ~ ~ i NCH ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Mont omen County ~ . 9 Y emery County / \ ~
Area vnthm ~ ~ , ~ ~ j ~ - - A V Committee o/ 100 NCSR 1138 1.35 Acres t ` \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ % ' Deed Book 388 ~ittee o/ 100 ~ ~ / i Book 388 ~ i ,,~e°
' ' ~ \ Pa e 777 ~ ! ~ g 'age 777 ~ ~ o'`~°; ~
Fields ~ ~ ~ ~ - - i o ert 2.52 Acres t ~ ~ 0 / F< Pr p y ~ i / 1 ~ /~0 Wyk lui . ~ ~ / / Surve of the Found. ~ To o ra hic y P g P luminum' / ~ Set: 3/4
` ~ / ,Mon ~ ~ ment ,Mor~u ~ ~ Iron Rebar
NET AREA = 33.86 Acres t ~ / / ~ ~ a. ~ ~ ~ % / f-- ~ ~
ted b Coordinate Method ~ ~ ~ / , ~ Compu Y ~ ~ 4J~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ po er ~ - _ - ~ ~s. / ~ ~ / i po~e ~ po er ~ po~e ~
r. R ~ • / ~ A portion of the "PINEY WOODS" Tract of the Mary Aileen S. Willis property / fire
O _ o ~ ~ h rant located °t the intersection of N.C. Highway 24, 27, & 109 and N.C. Secondary Rood 1138 ~ / ~ Troy Township, Montgomery County, North Carolina
~ _ ~ ~ , - h ~ N01E 1: An under round fiber optics cable ~ ~ ~ ' • ~ ' ~ ~ ' 9 ~ ~ ' Deed Reference Book 147 Page 19, Book 202 Page 877, Book 239 Page 422, ~ / , y ~ j ~ ~ Deed Book 369 Page 501 and Deed Book 430 Page 667; Plat Cabinet C Slide 165-A.
arentl lies buried between the north ti ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ % /jc.. , ~ / opP Y .D ~ A ~ ~ ~ / ri ht-of-wa of N.C. Hi hwa 24 & 27 d ~ j i' ~ 1 , / ~ Surveyed by Thomas J. fields, PLS-2906, on August 17th thru 21st, 1998. h F > ~
9 Y 9 Y S Q~ ~ the ower line of Carolina Power - ~ ~ ~ -_i ~y~ p and p ~ ~ \ f,, O \ ~ ' - ~ h~ o To o ra hic Surve erformed Se tember thru October 2001. . o ~ P 9 P Y P P
and Light Company. 9'!0, ~ ~ ~ Q, ~L ~ % hP~~~ ' Lorry W. fiomPson y O . ~ ~ ~i owa 50~ ' ~ ~ o 5~ / REVISED & UPDATED on December 10, 2004.
~ P ~ now or formerly f R ~ s ~ ~ of ~ ~ ~ P ~ ~ i /
Deed Book 181 Page 103 °oa ~ ~ ~ - _ ~ ~ , _ i Plot Book 5 Page 41 rid ~ ~ ~ - ~ ' / , ~ ,
A ~ ` ~ 100 0 100
/ Scole is in Feet
~ ~ ~ 1"= 100'
Legend ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ _ r Found. 3 4" / / denotes measured points \ \ Raght-of-Way of
in the center of roads. V ~ Iron Pipes V ~ ~ / ~ ~ ,4 5ep / i, NC Highway 24 & ,27 From the office of was annexed by the WRIGHT & FIELDS LAND SURVEYING
denotes monuments found ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ ' Town of TTOy in 1340 Albemarle Road, Suite C
or set as noted on plat. ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ i ( / ~ Found: denotes measured points; , August 1994 Troy, N.C. 27371
no monuments found or set. ~ ~ ~ , , Aluminum ~ ~ ~ ~ % ~ Monument t
d r~ ~ ~ / enotes fire h rants ~
v ~ i
i ~ v
s~ ~ ~i Easement Deed / V ~ ~ / ~
Central Telephone ~ A ~ ; / ~ NORTH CAROLINA ~ ~ ~
Company ~ \ ~ jn MONTGQMERY COUNTY Deed Book 245 Poge 799 \ ~ ~ ~ / / North Caror a rtion
\ / ~ ~ Deportment of rransportion • „~~y~~i,„ ` power i i Deed Boric 246 Page 428 428 Curve Data along N.C. Highway 24 & 27 and N.C.S.R. 1138
hat this lat was ~rh . Pie ~ I, Thomas J. Fields, certify t p 1 \ \ Easement Deed CURVE DELTA RADIUS ARC CHORD TANGENT CHORD BRG Bearings & Distances along Bearings do Distances around
m an actual surve done by me in "fit kiJ Easement Deed ~ ~ • prepared fro Y Q` ~ ` _ cts correct ~ 7S • • Randolph Electric ~ ~ •8 , i Deed Book 246 Poge 426 Sept Oct 2001 and is m all respe ~ U F E 1~ ~ Membershi Cor oration o,: ~ / ~ ~ / 426 cl 320'43" 5769.58 FT 336.87 Er 336.82 Fr 168.48 F1 `i 4=''19°32„ W north Ri~At-of-flay of 30 F1' z 30 Ff Leese Site for Bearings & Distances
est of m knowled a and belief. The ; 0 2 ~.9 p p ` ~ to the b y 9 Q Deed Book 351 Poge 97 0 ~ ~ , (2 i'26~04" 1164.55 FT 151.11 FT 151.00 LT 75.66 2T N 4?'59~34" W N.C. Hl ~l>Aa 24 27 Central Telephone COIIlpany C3 21'13'10" 722.75 FT '67.67 Fl ?66.14 F7 135.39 FT 36'06'04° E g y LINE BEARING DISTANCE
ratio of precision as calculated by latitudes and F4 Q S~ L - , _ C4 ?'21'35" 1024.43 FT 131.59 FT 131.50 F T 65.89 F T ;1'48'41" E LINE BEARING DISTANCE LINE REARING DISTANCE l4 44'00'47" W 50.00 ~ l
departures is 1:20,000'+ This plat was L-2906 N- / Set: 3/4 .z - :c: ~i prepared in accordance with Board Rule .1600 } ? Iran Rebar 6'54'46" 1024.43 FT 123.60 FT 123.52 FT 61.87 FT 5 14'40'30" F L7 N 46'00'02 W 40.00 ~T L11 7 4635'S5~ E 29.99 f 1 L5 N 46'2Q~32~ W 33~._`~6 F T C5 L6 6'54'28" 2128.88 Fi 256.66 FT '?56.51 FT 128.49 FT S 0~'45'S3" E L8 75'3233" W 43.13 F1 L12 S 4324'05" W 30.00 F7
s0 0.~; Witness my original signature and official stamp ~ 1~ . 2~, : • ~ C7 2'2121" 6264.64 FT 257.59 Fl 257-57 FT 128,81 FT S 03'U75!~" L L9 5 50'43'26° W 4721 fT 1.13, N 46'3555" W :i0-00 FT
S , v ~ ~ Tie Line to NCGS Grid Monument "THOMPSON" this the 10th day of December 2004 ~,'9 t,F (t S 34'47'42" W 1773.11 FT rid distance ~ S ~ . y (g ) u/ ~ Faund: Aluminum Monument C8 3'59'30" 1247.16 Fl 86.89 FT 86-87 FT 43.46 FT 5 00'0_'27" W L10 N 39'16'32" W 58.56 FT L14 N 43'^4'42~~ E 30.00 FT
~ -~f , ~ JFc•eGi~ NAD 83 coordinates for "THOMPSON i N=577.339.87 FT C9 24'25'18" 602.96 FT 256.99 FT 255.05 LT 130,48 FT N 58'33~34'~ W
N=575,883.79 FT, E=1,721,227.52 FT j I I E=1,722,239.33 FT Job No. 2004-291
combined factor = 0.9998572 / SURVEYOR PLS-2906
v }
So

-

` t~ Z
ae a o e e
200 0 200 200
Scale is in Feet
1 200'
i
i i i i
I i
I
~ , ~
Area N. of Industrial Dr. ROW to the ~ ~ ~
northern ROW line of the gravity sewer - - ~ i
=159390 sf or 3.66 Acres ~
Dedicated by Town of Troy to remain as is.
K. R. Drenth ~
~ Uwhamfe Custom Mnlworka T. 3.21 aces ~ 35X Impervious ~ ~ ~
Drivewa to Drenth & other ro ert i 3X Am ~~,a m°'~" p"""°"° Y P P Y p Thamae J. Fxdds OfAce Strip i' ~ 1.92 saes i'
on the N side of gravity sewer line. ~1 Drivewa = 24'x 377' = 9048 sf or .21 acres impervious ' 1• 26X Impervious
Y , Driveway = .54 Acres Total ROW i 1a / ~ ~ / /
I ~`n `e i / 1. i
NORTH ~ i' i 1 i ,
- CAROLINA u U ~ ~
GRID NORTH ~ _ - Industrial Drive i Town of Troy _ _ _ i ~ - = - / '
i i _ ~ Dedicated ROW ~ I res that are i erv i ous 25 x1652 - 41 , 300 sf or 95 Ac mp t 3.66 Aaea I ~ q~ i I e ~ ~ ~ ~
res of ROW ) I nductr i a l Dr ~ ve has 2.28 Ac i ~ r o.
i Aaa,me 25X impervious ~ i„ 1 Ir I i , i . i Uwharrie Buildero i
- - I ~ ).58 saes o~ i i j ' 11% Impervious ~ ~1~ i
a I ewes o I .i I 1 I ~ ~ 1j j1 to ~9
i t i ~ j it y0 / / ~
v i' / 0 0 /
E I i to Foods: . ~ \ C~4e~ ' / ~ \ ~ J / / 0
Bldg.-288'x177' = 40,356 sf /
Concrete pad = 25 x35 = 875 sf
Enc I osed b I d = 26'x27' = 702 sf Mhd~Schedene tract 9 \ (~l~ / / J~ % ~ /
Pads for ch i I I er = 27' x 60' = 1620 sf ` Assume 25% impervious
Pads for ch i I I er = 39'x22' = 858 sf ` Elite Food. ~ 7.43 saes
Loading dock = 117' x83' = 9711 sf 5sx ~mperdous
Drive = 22'x120' = 2640 sf TOTAL ACTUAL ~ ASSUMED IMPERVIOUS ACRES
Sidewalk = 64 x6 = 384 sf ~ - ~ /
Parking area = 208'x111' = 23,088 sf Drivewa to Drenth - .21 A ~ ~ r Y `
Sidewalk = 5 x30 = 150 sf Industrial Drive - 2.28 A '
Holdin La oon = 4000 sf Elite Foods - 4.22 A 9 9 DAF treatment facility = 2000 sf K.R. Drenth - 1.14 A
Parkin area = 5'x65' = 325 sf Uwharrie Custom Millworks - .38 A ~ g ~ / / /
Driveway = 28'x455' = 12740 sf Uwharrie Builders - .86 A
Wright d Fields - .51 A ~ ~ Parking area = 56 x143 = 8008 sf „ \ 4,
Park i n area = (semi tr i an I e) 310' x310' x .667 = 64, 002 sf S i ng I e Owner ( a I I ow ) - 2.00 A Assure 25x lnpervloua g g Industiral Park (1) (allow) - 2.50 A
Driveway = 50 x 310 = 15500 sf Industiral Park (2) (allow) - .67 A ' Uwharrie Builders
Drive ent. = 62'x 46' = 2852 sf Industiral Park (3) (allow) - 1.09 A ' Bld = 51'x101' = 5151 sf 9
- ~ TOTAL IMPERVIOUS: - 183,811 sf or 4.22 Acres Gravel storage area = 215`x100' = 21500 sf
PERCENT IMPERVIOUS = 56% TOTAL IMPERVIOUS - 15.86 A \ Gravel drive = 22'x111' = 2442 sf
Paved parking ~ sidewalk = 55'x75' = 4125 sf
TOTAL ACRES IN PARK = 56 A i Paved drive = 34'x67' = 2278 sf TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 35496 sf or .81 Acres + .05 Acres = .86 Acres
TOTAL PERCENT OF INDUSTIAL PARK - - PERCENT IMPERVIOUS = 11%
K R Drenth Truck Gara e THAT IS IMPERVIOUS = 15.86/56 = 28% 9
Bldg = 80 x50 = 4000 sf ONLY 2 PROPERTIES OUT OF THE FIVE THAT Pu station ~r~~~,U i
Concrete pad = 10 x50 = 500 sf HAVE BUILT OUT ARE ABOVE 30% IMPERVIOUS. Gravel parking d drive area = 130'x350' = 45,500 sf / Driveway = 15 x138 - 2070 sf ' ^ _~~ri~
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS: = 50,000 sf or 1.14 Acres PS Concrete = 50 sf
ONE OF THE 3 REMAINING 1 IS AT 26% IMPERVIOUS ~ ~ PERCENT IMPERVIOUS = 35% THE OTHER 2 ARE AT 11% AND 13%. ~00~ ~ , TOTAL: 2120 sf or .05 Acres ~
~ ~ Add this area to Uwharrie Builders area f
THIS SUMMARY DOES NOT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT LOW ' ` o ° r ~ %f
/ ~ ~ ~j~~~~~
Uwharrie Custom Millworks LANDS~fiHAT HAVE BEEN CLASSIFIED AS WETLANDS / ON THE UWHARRIE BUILDERS SITE. THERE IS A LOT OF `
Bldg = 85 x80 = 6800 sf LAND THERE THAT IS UNUSEABLE. ~ Wright & Fields Office Strip
Sidewalk = 90'x4' = 360 sf ~ / ~ Gravel parking = 41'x60' = 2460 sf USING 25% FOR THE UNSOLD SITES IS VERY CONSERVATIVE / Bldg = 112`x35' = 3920 sf
Gravel driveway = 30'x173' = 5190 sf BASED ON THE OVERALL IMPERVIOUS PERCENTAGE OF THE ~ Garage = 25'x25' = 625 sf
Concrete ad = 25x25 = 625 sf t / P BUILT OUT SITES. Concrete slabs = 100 sf
Concrete ads= 5 x12 = 60 sf / ~ P Gravel parking = 53'x71' = 3763 sf
Gravel drive = 20'x71' = 1420 sf / Gravel parking = 80'x77' = 6160 sf
' TOTAL IMPERVIOUS: 16,915 sf or .38 Acres / Gravel drive = 42'x20' = 840 sf
PERCENT IMPERVIOUS = 13% 1 Asphalt parking = 49'x112' = 5488 sf
Sidewalk = 7`x 85' = 595 sf
Asphalt drive = 34'x16' = 544 sf TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 22 035 sf or .51 Acres
PERCENT IMPERVIOUS = 26y.
NORTH CAROLINA
MONTGOMERY COUNTY ~ ~a
N0. REVISION DATE BY APP'D DRAWING N0:
C a R SCALE:
a - nnTr.
l` . F,s s,o
TOWN OF TROY ENGINF ENGINEERING DEPT. o of N9 y DRAWN BY:
= QQ { SEAL CHECKED BY:
315 NORTH MAIN ST r^ 8467 APPROVED BY: MAIN STREET
G FNC PROJECT NO.
TROY N.C. 273 . 27371 r INE~ SHT. SHTS. ti ~F
CRgy OF
..1TroyIndustUpdatedPJat.dgn 6/19/2006 10:50:33 AM

MONTGOMERY COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT N0. 060 APRIL 2006 059-06
6
U
SHEEP INDEX ...............M 2
°Z~'~cf~'~E~ 2OtQe~ ~Fk
SHEET N0. ~'~,~'9~/
* 9 ~ W. PEP',. PROJECT AREA
1 ACCESS ROAD ,'•~tt~ ~f ~R "'~r~'~,'
2 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS ~/f/ G N
TROY q `L~ ,~p9
1
TR~TEC CIVIL ENVIRONMENTAL,
TROY
4L, PC BUSINESS
CENTER
401 COMMERCE PLACE TRITECH
ASHEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA, 27203 Z~2~3 105'
[phone]
WWW.TRITECHCIVIL.COM
VICINITY MAP

.
RIGHT OF WAY „ uuq
DISTANCE FROM EDGE OF LEGEND ~
R/W TO ROAD CENTERLINE . ~ J . TROY-IDX-CONTOURS (ROAD) ~ ~'6,~•.
VARIES TROY-INi-CONTOURS ROAD 0 ~r ~ ~
- -IXIST. IDX CONTOURS ~ V N < . ;
545 545 IXIST. INT CONTOURS ;W : 3: :y
4' 24' OF S 9.5 B ASPHALT, 2" THICK 4' 6' ti f~~, I~`~ ~ ,.,V,oN , ' vP,,••
SHOULDER SHOULDER DITCH
a,m >,,a~
1 4" PER FT. 1/4" PER FT. „ „ ~
1 PER FT. 1 PER FT. 540 4.1 2. CONS TRU CTI ON S E UE 54o NCE N T S
•1 48" END 2' 1:1 48" END 1. DESIGN COMPLETED USING BASE DRAWING PROVIDED BY SITE 1. OBTAIN EROSION CONTROL PERMIT.
8" COMPACTED AGGREGATE SECTION SECTION UTILITY & DESIGN SERVICES. 2. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, TEMPORARY
BASE COURSE UNDER ROAD 6 IYP. BOTH ( (TYP. BOTH ENDS) SEDIMENT TRAPS, AND PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL ~
N . A C 535 --se.. . AL A t~ 535 2. GRAY WALLS (910-572-3661) IS CONTACT WITH TOWN OF DEVICES. o ~ TROY. 3. REQUEST INSPECTION FOR PERIMETER INSTALLED -
• ' EROSION CONTROL DEVICES. ~
NO SCALE - ~ 3. CONCRETE OR CORRUGATED ALUMINUM END SECTIONS SHALL 4. CLEAR AND GRUB SITE.
48" RCP 40~. 48" CP ~Cp\ ~ ~ BE PLACED AT BOTH ENDS OF 48" CULVERT. 5. INSTALL REMAINDER OF EROSION CONTROL DEVICES.
iNV.=53fi.3 INV. 533.0 6. REMOVE EXISTING 48" CMP. 533.0
' 530 _ _ 530 4. WETLANDS IMPACT (DETERMINATION BY U.S. CORPS OF 7. GRADE SITE (LAND DISTURBING PROCEDURES).
PUMPING STATION 0+00 1 +00 00 ENGINEERS) IS 35 FEET IN WIDTH (17.5 FEET ON BOTH 8. INSTALL 48" RCP, END SECTIONS, AND TURF
LINE BEARING DISTANCE SIDES OF CENTERLINE OF CULVERT) FOR THE ENTIRE LENGTH REINFORCEMENT.
L1 S 43'16'15" E 87.60 FT OF THE NEW CULVERT. 9. MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL DEVICES, A MINIMUM a OF WEEKLY AND AFTER EVERY RAIN.
L2 S 46'43'45" W 60.00 FT TION ROADS C B B 10. SEED AND VEGETATE STREAM CHANNEL WHERE TURF w M
L3 N 43'16'15" W 13,33 FT O REINFORCEMENT IS INSTALLED. J N
L4 N 43'16'15" W 24.22 FT AT R L5 N 43'16'15„ W 50.05 FT / ('j ABC ~ „ 11. LAND DISTURBING PROCEDURES COMPLETED AND ~
„ Set: / 0 ~ / 21.20 Fr ~ ~ - H 1 =50 V 1 =5 L6 N 46 43 45 E Q SITE STABI I N L ZED. WQ
\ 3/4" Fen' ~ / (1 / L7 N 46'43'45" E 38.80 FT ~ ~ ~ \ 6 / 12. REMOVE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES. U
~ Rebbr / / Q ~ GJ / / SEWER LINE DATA ~ s 13. REQUEST FINAL INSPECTION FOR EROSION CONTROL Q ? Z ACCEPT J ~ ANCE. 4. p co
~L / s F /~,r / LINE BEARING DISTANCE o~`y, / 0~ W ~o
L8 N 62 40 33 W 60.61 FT ~ ~6 , o Q~ / 5 , / wQ~
L9 S 81'5743" W 196.86 FT ~ ' ~ o ~ ~ / PgG / ! UU~ Z~
L10 S 89'04'55" W 196.82 FT i ~ ~ ~ / „ i / ~ W ~
L11 N 71'42 40 W 174.47 FT 1 I a ~ - / •o. r ~ ~ ^ R ON T 0 ~ L N NOT ~ ~
L12 N 88'12'46" W 322.23 FT ~ i ` 1 1 / / Q , / ~5 „ ~ ~ o ~o OZr,)
L13 N 44'55 58 E 103.18 FT ~ - / ~f ! ~ ' % • F EXCELSIOR MATTING \ ~ 1 / . / oil',• L14 N 0213'20" W 141.95 FT y ; , DEED B K 554 , / ~ , 0~ U P,~
1 .96 FT 2 IN DITC ( ) ~ pq / / G A P RM NT MEASURES SHALL BE INS' L15 N 02 34 33 W 32 ~ ~ I / / LL E ANE 1. TH TOWNS T ~ ~ E HALL AKE ALL PRECAUTIONS TO AVOID THE SILTING OF STREAMS, ~ p HALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION LAKES, OR OTHER WATER SOURCES DUE TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. ~ rY
--r - '1 '57" E 119.06 FT ~ T ~ / / - L16 N 52 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ a :.F ~5 SCHEDULE. SEEDING OF THE SITE (WITH TI Z ~O
Y , ~ /~0 GO SITE (WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE STREAM CHANNEL) SHALL BE BASED W m
- I ~ / ON THE SEEDING SCHEDULE. TURF REINFO ~ 1 f / New Road Easement ~ ;1 ; - : - / CHANNEL IMMEDIATELY UPSTRAM & DOWNS TURF REINFORCEMENT MATTING SHALL BE PLACED IN THE STREAM 2. EFFECTNE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INITIATED PRIOR TO THE COM- w VERT END SECTIONS FOR THE FULL MENCEMENT OF CLEARING, GRADING, EXCAVATING, OR OTHER OPERATIONS THAT WILL 2
I • / ~M & DOWNSTREAM OF THE CUL DISTURB THE NATU ~ ~ RAL PROTECTION. THE EROSION CONTROL DETAILS SHOWN HEREIN
Z I, / p - EXTENT OF CHANNEL DISTURBANCE. THE E o I r / 'ANCE. THE EXISTING CHANNEL SHALL BE WIDENED TO THE DIMENSIONS ARE FOR REFERENCE. THE DETERMINATION OF WHICH DETAIL IS APP Q LICABLE AS THE
f / ~ INDICATED, AND STABILIZED USING EROSIOP LINE BEARING DISTANCE ` I , 51NG EROSION CONTROL TURF REINFORCEMENT. SLOPE STABILIZATION WORK PROGRESSES SHALL BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER.
• _ k~ / WOODS - SHALL BE PROVIDED BY NORTH AMERICAN L17 N 12 59 06 W 254.55 FT ~ , I - fH AM RICAN GREEN C350 THR DIMENSIO ANENT UV
' ~ / Q STABILIZED POLYPROPYLENE NET WITH FIBI .I r~~" ,t IET WITH FIBER MATTING OR EQUAL. THE CHANNEL SLOPES AND, BOTTOM 3. ALL TRENCHES SHALL BE STABILIZED AS SOON AS IS PRACTICAL TO MINIMIZE EROSION.
SHALL BE PREPARED, AND THE EROSION L18 N 77'00'54" E 45.00 FT ~ > / TTING SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE CHANNEL WORK IS TO CEASE FOR OVERNIGHT OR LONGER, THE OPEN TRENCHES SHALL IE EROSION CONTROL MA BE LEFT SO AS TO PREVENT WATER IN THE TRENCH DUE TO RAIN OR OTHER CAUSES °
~ ~ / ~F BOTTOM ANO SLOPE IN STRICT ACCORDAN( Town of Tro ~ 0 ' , 55 T ACCORDANCE WITH THE MATERIAL MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS, a FROM BEING CHANNELED INTO A CREEK, LAKE, ROADSIDE DITCH, ETC. UPON START UP
s 1r59'o6" E 204.14 FT ~ Y - - "j` - WITH THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS OR S L19 NORTH Troy usrness Center ~ ~ , ~ ATIONS OR STIPULATIONS: OF WORK AGAIN, ALL WATER IN THE TRENCH SHALL BE PUMPED INTO A STONE FILTER
~ A R ~ ~I N A eed Bodk 369 Page 501 _ _ o ~ 15" INV. 550.00--- TRENCH AS DETAILED HEREIN. }
Leo S 12'59'06" E 58.97 FT lat Cabinet`6~Slide 165-A F... , p ~ ' THE EROSION CONTROL NET SHALL BE AN GRID NORTH ~ t~, -l n, TRACE BE ANCHORED WITH "U" SHAPED 9-GAUGE WIRE m
1 ~u , , STAPLES WITH A MINIMUM TOP WIDTH OF ~ L21 S 62'43'12" E 73.56 FT NAD 83 ~ A / C~ „ „ ~ WIDTH OF ONE INCH AND LENGTH OF EIGHT INCHES. 4. THE TOWN SHALL AVOID THE PLACEMENT OF ANY MATERIAL OVER ANY EROSION CONTROL DEVICE WHILE R IS IN USE. ~
~ - ~ ~ STAPLE PATTERN E (3.8 STAPLES/YD.) S ~PLES/YD.) SHALL BE EMPLOYED. AN ADDITIONAL TWO ~
A TY?ICAL ROAD • ' n / ' APR XIMA Y FOUR L22 N 46'43'45" E 106.96 FT ~ ROWS OF STAPLES P O TEL ~ ~ % ~TELY FOUR INCHES ROWS AND STAPLES) APART IN A 5. THE TOWN SHALL INSPECT ALL EROSION CONTRO ° ( L DEVICES AT THE END OF
1 SECTIQN o ; y / y STAGGERED PATTERN SHALL BE INSTALLED , IE INSTALLED FOR A DISTANCE OF TEN FEET IMMEDIATELY EACH WORK DAY, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN A GOOD STATE OF REPAIR, UNTIL THE USE
L23 S 43'16'15" E 45.00 FT ~ ~ , , % ' DOWNSTREAM OF THE CULVERT END SECTh . ~ / _ _ _ _ - T END SECTION. OF THE DEVICES ARE NO LONGER WARRANTED. AT THIS TIME THE DEVICES SHALL BE
, REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF SO AS TO CAUSE NO STREAM SILTATION.
' - ~ t:, ~ ~ 724 S 48°43'45" W 100.00 FT" ~ ~ ' C~ / " 540 LIME OR PEttETIZED FERTILIZER SHALL NC \ _ ~ , . , \ to tR SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO STREAM KS A Z ON THE 2:1 SLOPES FROM THE TOP OF THE
W00 _ / ~ LIQUID FERTUZER ~Wtl ' A[ S . •t21 i , Y THE ~ , = . ~ ; o U AL1~1l~4TIVEL , THE A F ~Oh11ROl ~IEASIJ>R€S
" • 7 ' ~ i A HYDROSEeDER PRIOR TO APPLICATION ~ ~ SH PLACED IN STREAM CHANN PLICATION) AND APPLIED ONLY TO THE SLOPES OF THE ALL EL AS INDICATED AND REQUIRED TO SUPPORT ~
- ~ Sta l ~E TEI~PORAR'Y,S~IENT ~ CHANNEL MORE THAN TWO FEET ABOVE Th N 62'43'12' W i :ET ABOVE THE BOTTOM OF THE CHANNEL. VEGETATION. a
P . ~ on ~ ~ 67.28 FT ~ - _ _ 2 TRAP ~ P. OF 3
Easeme~+,t No. 1 e INSTALLATION OF THE EROSION CONTROL T R150.00 1 r Found 6 ~ CONTROL TURF REINFORCEMENT SHALL BEGIN AT THE TOP OF ~
c{ ~ , s THE CHANNEL BY ANCHORING THE MATERU 0.44 Acre t THE MATERIAL IN A 12-INCH DEEP BY 6-INCH WIDE TRENCH, ~
P ~ t . oplar Tree 8 OR 1Q Sf _ _ ; - - BACKFILLED AND COMPACIT:D IMMEDIATELY ~ , APPROXIMATE L IMMEDIATELY AFTER INSTALLATION. EACH ROLL SHALL BE m
68 L.F. 48 P „ ~ OVERLAPPED AT LEAST 6-INCHES. - - , RES. °
2-48 FLARED END SECTI
M ®4.070 - ~ ~ } ~ - IF ANY STAPLES BECOME LOOSENED OR R - OP MANHOLE PoY - ~ , ~SENED OR RAISED, OR IF ANY MATTING BECOMES LOOSE, TORN, OR
. _ _ . _ . _ ~ \ CHAIN LINK FE - , .-•'M ~ ~ - ~ ~ UNDERMINED, REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IMI BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. ~
- - - _ ~
NEW 48 INV. ~ ~ NEW 48 RCP END NOT ~ ~ ~ RYEGRASS LOLIUM MULTIFLORUM SHALL f ' ACCESSI ( ) f- ELEV. 536.30 ~ - INV. 533.00 ,UM) SHALL BE SOWN AT THE RATE OF APPROXIMATELY 2 POUNDS FOR
- - s EVERY 1,000 SQ. FT. OF EROSION CONTR( ISION CONTROL TURF REINFORCEMENT. IN NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL
o, ~ ~ ~ ~ e - FESCUE OR ANY OTHER SEED SPECIES BE SPECIES BE ALLOWED TO ENTER THE CHANNEL. TOWN SHALL PLANT a
\ ~ SPRIGS OF TAG ELDER ALNUS RUGOSA OI 8 CULVERT INLET / ( W S RUGOSA OR ALNUS SERRULATA) OR BLACK WILLOW (SALIX NIGRA) AT ~ C
' ti EXIST. 48 CM ti THE RATE OF APPROXIMATELY ONE PLANT ONE PLANT FOR EVERY 10 SQ. FT. ON THE CHANNEL SLOPES. ~
2 PR ECTION TYP. ~ ' ~ ( ) TO BE REMOVED "FD. DOT STON D A 0
B ROAD TION f SILT SCREEN 2 OTHER VE ATIVE SPECIES MAY BE USED ~ ~ ~ I GET ~ ~ IAY BE USED WITH PRIOR APPROVAL OF DWQ. W
1 AT CULVERT , - ~ / / ~ ~ ~ _ Found: 7 8"_-Iron Rebars s , / V
4Q ~ / at three corners of the ~ i / W
_ - ~ _ _ a ,'SC / Pumping Station Lot i ~ ; 1..___. / Vr ~ ~ I V
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a
1 _ - • , ~ i ! i ~ Q O I + O
wocps ~ / / EXIST. GRAVEL ~.-e ~ ~ I I ~ Z I W
' ' ~ , o , , ~ ~ ~ DRIVEWAY 54~ ~ _ 0 560 ~ H ~ / 560 ~
Set: 3 4" Iron Rebar / ~ V~ ~ Curve ength 1 .00 C
North = 578,357.66 FT h1~ I _ , ~ ~ I „ _ [ , = 11.26 / i 7 ~
...East = 1,722,477.60 FT , - , _ : ~I _ ~ o EXIST. 15 CPP _ f , ~ = 2.50 W 0 W
_ I , ~ ~ I TO BE REMOVE CLEARING , urve Length = 100.00 _ _ I K = 2.70 = 100.00 ~ ~ / ~ V
~ - , f 3 ' 3 0 • TEMPORARY DIVERSION C o I 555 E = 0.55 2.70 i ~ 555 Z V
- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -DITCH (TYP.) 2 0.55 W~ I ~ ~ a
- - _ _ _ R POL 7 8° Iron I I r ~ ~ ~ V m ~ ~
- ~ , .Rebar O ~ ' 2.00 ~i rn
S~ ~ ~ _ . • vJ _ I I 550 0 \ ~ + / ~ y 0 + O N j
fl ' ~ • J o \ ~ ~I I "I ~ - 550' o r` ''v Cr w a! t II I ~ 550 W ~
oar 4g> P Easement No. 2 + cv v ~ C a o Z
~ 6&9) ` - ~ w ~ / - ~2 I 0.19 Acre t _ _ ° r er Drive ~ ~ o I ° ~ ~ ~ Q N ? ~ G( I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I
v + o ~ I ~ ~ uaaa ~ ~
/ x?~ \ 0 I ~ TEMP. -CONSTRUCTION A Q > o ~ ~ U
N p o ~ ~ \ ~ ~ I ENTRANCE (IYP.) 2 cn w o N ~ t~nw w i
~ I 545 Q > ~ ~ fi ° ~ ~ 545 PROJECT NUMBER > - -
j h~ I tow h \ I w ~ 06059-06
I ~ - - s, I > ~ a II II ~ DESIGNED BY
~ Uwh ~ ~ Q> / ~ ~ ~ ~ LWP
' i \ I Deed ! ~ F\~ \ ~ I ~w ~ \ ~
\ \ \ 540 t ~ / 540 DRAWN BY
~ \ _ \ \ ' - MRS \ ~ I
\ ~ \ \ I / I ~ ~ ~ CHECKED BY
CURVE DATA ~ \ I i ~ ~ LWP
Jn n \ i t ~ ~ i
5 / Radius = 602.96 FT I t \ 'NEW 48- RCP- INV. L 534.93 535 SCALE
Q/ Arc = 50.01 FT \ 535;
e, Chord Information u \ \ I nor N 73V8'44" W ~ AS NOTED
\ 50.00 FT \ I DATE
~a - , N ~ t In In 0) 0 po 0 0) ;(o 0 ~o APRIL 2006
U-) u7 ri to Ki {(6 to o "i 6 I
0~ LO 530 1 0 LO Lo + 't + 't ~ + tr) ~ + ~ 530 t17 L N 0 Lo M to I OF
0+00 1+ a ^ , , \ %11 \ 1 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 P: 06059-06 Dw a .REYSrrE-t.dw 1:1

,,1111 11111111111 V
D ROL LEGEN N CON ROSIO AND RADIN G 111 ~ 1~1 v
4" THICK 3 3' BERM IN CHANNELS ROLL OUT STRIPS OF MATTING PARALLEL TO ~ . ~ FINISH THE DIRECTION OF FLOW AND OVER THE PROTECTIVE MULCH ; 0;• ~ .
FLOOD STORAGE ZONE #57 STONE GRADE • ~ : a ; o.
Q ~ ~ • . :W p :3:
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EXIT, / • ~ EXISTING TREE LINE RIP-RAP CHANNEL SEDIMENT STORAGE ZONE MATTING NORTH s :~d
~ ~ ~ AMERICAN GREEN Q.
~ a MODEL C-125 ~N ~ r FLOW OR EQUAL '/I/lq 1j1/1/'
ti• ~ ~E EXISTING FENCES ~ - 111 1 c,~
EXCELSIOR MATTING INVERT PIPE
1' 8' 8' 5' MIN.
DRAINAGE COURSE
TST-3 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP (TST) SECT SECTION A-A z
w EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR if1
O ~N
778 LL r
PROPOSED GRADE CONTOUR RIP-RAP APRON OUTLET PROTECTION (RRA) l
INVERT PIPE
CULVERT (C)
A ~~r A INSTALL STAPLES EVERY FOUR FEET IN
CULVERT INLET PROTECTION (CIP) y^ } -~'~.--r- FLOW LINE, ALTERNATING EVERY TWO
CONSTRUCTION CLEARING LIMITS ~ / 'y" • ~ ry FEET ON EITHER SIDE. INSTALL STAPLES ~ , EVERY FOUR FEET ALONG TOP EDGES
a ._X~
STANDARD DOT ROCK SILT SCREEN `LLX~ ,.r ~ w FLOW O
STONE CHECK DAM CENTER LINE - STAPLE J N
(nP) N

TBM TEMPORARY BENCH MARK PR PERTY LINE 4 18 OVERLAP (TYP) U Z ~ CLASS "B"
R o (R) ` ~ Z Q- f RIP-RAP J J O
1 ~ W ~ O (o ~O
Q W
-TDD TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH (TDD) SECTION NUMBER OR DETAIL LETTER UU~ Z ~ ~
W I ~ d.
ABC NOTE: DIMENSIONS ARE MINIMUM UNLESS JOIN STRIPS BY ANCHORING ~
SEDIMENT FENCE 123 OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER. O co AND OVERLAPPING AS SHOWN . O Z r~
SHEET NUMBER (WHERE SECTION/DETAIL APPEARS ~ PLAN ~ r~ ¦ ~
OR WHERE SECTION/DETAIL WAS TAKEN FROM) ANCHOR MATTING IN p O
TSD-2 TEMPORARY SLOPE DRAIN (TSD) V RT INLET PROT CUL E Z ~ T PROTECTION 6 TRENCH (TYP) ~ o
B W m W
NO SCALE
J cn EXCELSIOR MATTIN F ~ Q
GRADING & EROSION CONTROL GENERAL NOTES: NO SCALE
1. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEEDING SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN 30 DAYS FOLLOWING LAND
DISTURBANCE. SEE EROSION CONTROL DETAIL
SHEET FOR SEEDING REQUIREMENTS AND 0 a
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE. a <
2. SEE EROSION CONTROL DETAIL SHEET FOR m
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP AND CULVERT
OUTLET STABILIZATION SIZING.
3. EXCELSIOR MATTING SHALL BE PLACED IN ~ 12 THICK LAYER OF < ,W 0
DITCHES AND OTHER AREAS THAT EXHIBIT #57 WASHED STONE 5 0' 2:1 SLOPE
MULCH DISPLACEMENT FROM VELOCITY SCOUR. MIN.
1:1 SIDE SLOPE (TYP)
i` ~ ~
J 8,_.~,, _ _ _ 2:1 SLOPE 5.0' MAX. z
~ ~ CLASS B ~ o RIP-RAP _
1800 CU FT/ACRE F
2' MIN. a NATURAL
LEVEL GROUND BASE LENGTH FILTER FABRIC ~
COMPACTED SOIL CROWN U
FROM DITCH EXCAVATION BERM SECTION A-A "
1.5' MIN. (PLACE ON 12" THICK LAYER OF .5 MIN. m
LOWER SIDE 0 21" MIN.
#57 WASHED STONE OF DITCH) s Q1 - _ 2:1 SIDE SLOPE MAX.
~ ~ DITCN ~
I FLOW 2:1 SLOPE ~ 2'1 DAM ~ u WEIR d
OR FLATTER HEIGHT Z
1.5
' ~ 6.0 t~,~y ~ EMERGENCY BY-PASS
SECTION A-A ~'ti j " I~Q.~LA_8 " " _ MAX• ~ DEPTH 6 BELOW TOP OF TRAP CLASS B RIP RAP a W
Oc
NOTE: THE DIVERTED RUNOFF SHOULD BE RELEASED THROUGH A ~
STABLIZED OUTLET, SLOPE DRAIN, OR SEDIMENT TRAPPING MEASURE. ~ 3 ~o J = 3 1:1 SIDE 1:1 SIOE SLOPE (TYP) o
. J ~ ~ FILTER 3.0' SLOPE N L _ a o ~ FABRIC MIN. MAX. ~
F~ ° ION DITCH NATURAL GROUND V
S IVER N ENT D PERMA TEMPORARY C c, so• TOP OF A J~J ~i BANK A W BASE WIDTH W
NO SCALE Q ti VZ a+ 0
V _ ~
ao J
Z W O B
B _ B I- ~ ~ ~ -
to I-
6" THICK MIN. OF 2-3" COARSE STONE `.~,-1~,~ C Z ~ ~
HEDU ~ ~ ING S o W
{ A A NV V
i SEEDING MIXTURE: P OF Z
SPECIES RATE ALB./ACRE) _ TO ~ W~ Z BANK
TALL FESCUE 100
KOREAN LESPEDEZA 40
BERMUDA HULLED 15 BASE OF DITCH ( ) NOTES: N o to A N ~
NOTE: A W
BETWEEN MAY 1 AND AUG. 20, ADD 10 LBS./ACRE GERMAN 1 A STABILIZED PAD OF CRUSHED STONE SHALL BE LOCATED WHERE TRAFFIC WILL ~ C ~ TOP OF Z
MILLET. BETWEEN AUG. 15 AND MAY 1, ADD 40 LBS./ACRE BE ENTERING OR LEAVING A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO OR FROM A PUBLIC STREET. TOP OF BANK ~ ~ W
RYE GRAIN .BETWEEN SEPT. 1 AND OCT. 25 OVERSEED WITH IF THIS LOCATION IS SUBJECT TO SEEPAGE OR HIGH WATER TABLE STABILIZE BANK ( ) 10 LBS./ACRE OF KOBE LESPEDEZA. FOUNDATION WITH GEOTEXTiLE FABRIC. , ~
r_ 8 TRAP PLAN m
2 THIS ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT SEEDING DATES: i>-.,, h ,
AUGUST 20 -OCTOBER 25 TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS OR EXISTING Y PROJECT NUMBER DAM HEIGHT
FEBRUARY 1 -MAY 1 PAVEMENT. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE . 06059-06 3.0 MAX. - 1.5 MIN.
AS CONDITIONS DEMAND AND REPAIR AND OR CLEANOUT OF ANY MEASURES / SEDIMENT TRAP SCHEDULE (SEE NOTE BELOW) DESIGNED BY
SOIL AMENDMENTS: USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. EXISTING DISTURBED REQUIRED TRAP BASE BASE LWP
APPLY AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE AT 2-3 TONS/ACRE GRADE TRAP N0. DEPTH (FT.) WEIR (FT.) BASE OF DITCH AREA (ACRE) VOLUME (CU. FT.) LENGTH (FT.) WIDTH (FT.)
FERTILIZER - 1,000 LBS./ACRE - 10-10-10 3 ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC STREETS BASE DRAWN BY - TST-1 0.2 360 30 16 2.0 4.0 MRS
SUPERPHOSPHATE - 500 LBS. ACRE - 20% ANALYSIS MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. / SECTION B-B MULCH - 2 TONS/ACRE -SMALL GRAIN STRAW
4 WHEN NECESSARY, WHEELS MUST BE CLEANED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ANCHOR -ASPHALT EMULSION AT 300 GAL./ACRE I A PU I TREET. WHEN WASHING IS RE UIRED IT SHALL BE DONE TST-2 0.2 360 30 16 2.0 4.0 CHECKED BY
ENTR NG BL C S Q , TST-3 0.3 540 30 16 3.0 4.0 LWP
ON AN EREA STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE WHICH DRAINS INTO AN MULCH: APPROVED SEDIMENT BASIN.
. , .,r.,.,., ~.~T NCITF• MAXIMIIM HEIGHT ~F SAM SHALL BE AM SHALL BE NO MORE THAN sc:•i F
LN-t-LY 4,000 IU 0,000 Lti/AUKL UKAIIV ~IKAW UK tWUIVRLGIVI I.VVCR. OR MULCH BY TACKING WITH ASPHALT, ROVING OR NETTING. ONE FOOT ABOVE NORMAL FLOW LE' SAL FLOW LEVEL. WIDTH OF
OF DAM SHALL BE NO LESS THAN AS NOTED LESS THAN WIDTH OF DITCH.
X NANCE. TEMPORARY GRAVEL I NTRAN T DAM
RTILIZE IN THE SECOND YEAR UNLESS GROWTH IS FULLY NO SCALE STAN DA
R DOT STONE SII UATE. MAY BE MOWED ONCE OR TWICE A YEAR. RESEED, CREEK APRIL 2006 'ONE SILT D SEDIMENT TEMPORARY TRAP E
ILIZE AND MULCH DAMAGED AREAS IMMEDIATELY. NO SCALE NO SCALE K::7 2 OF 2
P: 006059-06 0w s .REVSITE-idw 1:1

MONTGOMERY COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT N0. 4605 059-06
APRIL 2006
SHEET INDEX „NN~~~~N~~I~~ ~N~NN
SHEET N0. ~F/ crrer•''~._ ,r}i'gg5~:Lr:10439 i
PROJECT AREA
1 ACCESS ROAD * '••,,RRy w PgP``~r`'
2 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS ,
TROY
4 ~~0
N~ 1
TR~TEC CIVIL ENVIRONMENTAL,
TROY
1L, PC BUSINESS
CENTER
401 COMMERCE PLACE TRITECH
ASHEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA, 27203 '7203 X05• \
[phone]
WWW.TRITECHCIVIL.COM
VICINITY MAP

~
RIGHT OF WAY
DISTANCE FROM EDGE OF LLV ,~,'N, ~Uq~~I,, END ,
R/W TO ROAD CENTERLINE OY IDX CONTOURS (ROAD) ~ ~V r ~ 6
VARIES TROY-INT-CONTOURS (ROAD) ~ ~ t ~
EXIST. IDX CONTOURS ; Q : ~ J ~ d . V :y
545 4' 24' OF S 9.5 B ASPHALT, 2" THICK 4' 6' 545 EXIST. INT CONTOURS ;W p ~ 3 a . y
SHOULDER SHOULDER DITCH
1/4" PER FT. 1/4" PER FT. „
1" PER FT• 1 PER FT. 540 540 CAN ST RUCTI ON SE UENC E NOTES
4 Z ~ ~ - „
2• 48 EP „ 1:1 48" END 1. DESIGN COMPLETED USING BASE DRAWING PROVIDED BY SITE 1. OBTAIN EROSION CONTROL PER I M T.
8 COMPACTED AGGREGATE - SECTIC SECTION UTILITY & DESIGN SERVICES. 2. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, TEMPORARY
COURSE UNDER ROAD 6 BASE (TYP. (TYP. BOTH ENDS) SEDIMENT TRAPS, AND PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL ~
TYPICAL A e t~ R S TI 535 --s - 535 2. GRAY WALLS (910-572-3661) IS CONTACT WITH TOWN OF DEVICES. ~ w o ~
NO SCALE - ~•R TROY. 3. REQUEST INSPECTION FOR PERIMETER INSTALLED EROSION CONTROL DEVICES. ~
3. CONCRETE OR CORRUGATED ALUMINUM END SECTIONS SHALL 4. CLEAR AND GRUB SITE.
48" RCP 40~$ I 48" CP 48" CP BE PLACED AT BOTH ENDS OF 48" CULVERT. 5. INSTALL REMAINDER OF EROSION CONTROL DEVICES.
INV.=536.3 INV. 533.0 -INV. 533.0 6. REMOVE EXISTING 48" CMP.
530 530 4. WETLANDS IMPACT (DETERMINATION BY U.S. CORPS OF 7. GRADE SITE (LAND DISTURBING PROCEDURES).
PUMPING STATION -0+00 .......1+00--------..-. 1+00 ENGINEERS) IS 35 FEET IN WIDTH (17.5 FEET ON BOTH 8. INSTALL 48" RCP, END SECTIONS, AND TURF
LINE BEARING DISTANCE SIDES OF CENTERLINE OF CULVERT) FOR THE ENTIRE LENGTH REINFORCEMENT.
L1 S 43'16'15" E 87.60 FT OF THE NEW CULVERT. 9. MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL DEVICES, A MINIMUM d
L2 S 46'43'45" W 60.00 FT ROAD SEC TION OF WEEKLY AND AFTER EVERY RAIN. B 10. SEED AND VEGETATE STREAM CHANNEL WHERE TURF " M
L3 N 43'16'15" W 13.33 FT L4 N 43'16'15" W 24.22 FT O REINFORCEMENT IS INSTALLED. J N
A CULVER L5 N 43'16'15" W 50.05 FT / G ABC ' ~ 11. LAND DISTURBING PROCEDURES COMPLETED AND ~
L6 N 46'43'45" E 21.20 FT Set: ~ Q / . _ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ 0 / ~ H 1 -50 V 1 -5 N SITE STABILIZED.
N 4 '4 '4 " E 38.80 FT 3/4 ,<can , / ~ 6~ / L7 635 I~ ~ / WQ 12. REMOVE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES. U
~ Reb6r 1 / Q J ~ / ~ ~r SEWER LINE DATA ~ ~ ~(i its ~ G / s ~ / , / 13. REQUEST FINAL INSPECTION FOR EROSION CONTROL Q ? Z
LINE BEARING DISTANCE ~ o / p~ 1 Q7 ' r``. / ~c. / ACCEPTANCE. J ~ W ao~ ~O
L8 N 62'40'33" W 60.61 FT 6~ o~ / ~ " 5 ~ ~l / 5 , / , WQ~
L9 S 81'57 43 W 196.86 FT ~ '2 / POGf' / ~ ° UU~
L10 S 89 04 55 W 196.82 FT \ ~ I „ I i Z~ W2~
L11 N 71'42'40 W 174.47 FT ` I / ~ , ' ~ ~~d- ER IN C TR L GEN RA LN OTE
L12 N 8812 46 W 322.23 FT ~ , ~ t, ~ / / 0 \~5 L13 N 44'55'58" E 103.18 FT f / ' ~ ~ . ~o^ ~ ~
1 1 rr.~" o V . F EXCELSIOR MATTING ~ y ~ t / / ~ - L14 N 02'13'20" W 141.95 FT , ~ ~ , ~ DEED B K 55~ , / . ~z~ U ~
. 2 IN DITCH TYP. L15 N 02 34 33 W 132.96 FT ( ) ~ PA -6#1 / - G ~ ALL PERMANENT MEASURES SHALL B 1. THE TOWN SHALL TAKE ALL PREC ~ ~ AUTIONS TO AVOID THE SILTING OF STREAMS, ~ O DES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION LAKES, OR OTHER WATER SOURCES DUE TO THE CONSTRUCTION ~
, T ~ ~ r L16 N 52'10 57 E 119.06 F ~ ` , ~ 1 ~ ~ / / ~ 5 OF THIS PROJECT. Z ~
N { / 0 ~ SCHEDULE. SEEDING OF THE SITE W ~ / 0 r 0 ( 1 , I, ~ ~ , ~ ~ THE SITE WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE STREAM CHANNEL SHALL BE BASED ~ O ( ) W m
~ / ' ON THE SEEDING SCHEDULE. TURF F New Road Easement t ~ ~ )ULE. TURF REINFORCEMENT MATTING SHALL BE PLACED IN THE STREAM 2. EFFECTIVE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INITIATED PRIOR TO THE COM- W
- ~ ~ - r / CHANNEL IMMEDIATELY UPSTRAM & C 1PSTRAM & DOWNSTREAM OF THE CULVERT END SECTIONS FOR THE FULL MENCEMENT OF CLEARING, GRADING, EXCAVATING, OR OTHER OPERATIONS THAT WILL 2 DISTURB THE NATURAL PROTECTION. THE ER J N
Z ~ I / EXTENT OF CHANNEL DISTURBANCE. 1 ~ ~ / 0 ' ~ 1 / ~TURBANCE. THE EXISTING CHANNEL SHALL BE WIDENED TO THE DIMENSIONS OSION CONTROL DETAILS SHOWN HEREIN ~ ARE FOR REFERENCE. THE DETERMINATION OF WHICH DETAIL IS APPLICABLE AS THE Q
uNE aEaRiNC oisraNCE - INDICATED, AND STABILIZED USING EE 1 t ~ / .r 'ED USING EROSION CONTROL TURF REINFORCEMENT. SLOPE STABILIZATION WORK PROGRESSES SHALL BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER. ~
~ N 12°59'06" w ~ WOODS - SHALL BE PROVIDED BY NORTH AMEI L17 254.55 FT ~ NORTH AMERICAN GREEN C350 THREE DIMENSIONAL PERMANENT UV
' STABILIZED POLYPROPYLENE N WITI / 0 ET ENE NET WITH FIBER MATTING OR EQUAL. THE CHANNEL SLOPES AND BOTTOM 3. ALL TRENCHES SHALL BE STABILIZED AS SOON AS IS PRACTICAL TO MINIMIZE EROSION.
N 77°00 54 E ~ . ~ - - SHALL BE PREPARED, AND THE ERO; L18 45.00 FT J _ ' / , ND THE EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE CHANNEL WHEN WORK IS TO CEASE FOR OVERNIGHT OR LONGER THE OPEN TRENCHES SHALL
`Town of Tro / - "tt.. BOTTOM AND SLOPE IN STRICT ACCO STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE MATERIAL MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS BE LEFT SO AS TO PREVENT WATER IN THE TRENCH DUE TO RAIN OR OTHER CAUSES ° ' FROM BEING CHANNELED INTO A CREEK, LAKE, ROADSIDE DITCH, ETC. UPON START UP a
L19 S 12'59'06" E 204.14 FT N~RTH ~ ~ ~ y ~ ``~'0 Troy ~usmess Center 0 ~ WITH THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS - ODIFICATIONS OR STIPULATIONS: OF WORK AGAIN, ALL WATER IN THE TRENCH SHA LL BE PUMPED INTO A STONE FILTER
~ N A eed Bodk 369 Page 50f - _ ~ o „ CAROL ~ 15 INV. 550,00.-- L20 S 12'59'06" E 58.97 FT lat Cabinet`E~Slide 165-A ~ ;z o THE ERO CON TRENCH AS DETAILED HEREIN. }
GRID NORTH >,Z ^ SION TROL NET SHALL E NET SHALL BE ANCHORED WITH "U" SHAPED 9-GAUGE WIRE m
~ , _ ~ STAPLES WITH A MINIMUM TOP WIDTI- , L21 S 62°43'12" E 73.56 FT NAD 83 , ~0 ~ \ C M TOP WIDTH OF ONE INCH AND LENGTH OF EIGHT INCHES. 4. THE TOWN SHALL AVOID THE PLACEMENT OF ANY MATERIAL OVER ANY EROSION
~ , STAPLE PATTERN "E" (3.8 STAPLES/1 .8 STAPLES YD. SHALL BE EMPLOYED. AN ADDITIONAL TWO CONTROL DEVICE WHILE IT IS IN USE. ~
. A TYPICAL ROAD • ` ~ L22 N 46 43 45 E 106.96 FT ~ ; , ~ ~ R9VYS OF STAPLES APPROXIMATELY F o tOXIMATELY FOUR INCHES ROWS AND STAPLES APART IN A ° 5. THE TOWN SHALL INSPECT ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AT THE END OF
1 ' SECTION CLEARM f ; Z ~ y STAGGERED PATTERN SHALL BE INSTI ALL BE INSTALLED FOR A DISTANCE OF TEN FEET IMMEDIATELY EACH WORK DAY, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN A GOOD STATE OF REPAIR, UNTIL THE USE
v~ i L23 S 43'16'15" E 45.00 FT . t r ~ _ - - ' ~ DOWNSTREAM OF THE CULVERT END ULVERT END SECTION. OF THE DEVICES ARE NO LONGER WARRANTED. AT THIS TIME THE DEVICES SHALL BE
I , „ / _ 1~ >r~ REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF SO AS TO CAUSE NO STREAM SILTATION.
L24 S 46 43 45 W 100.00 FT - , ~ , ; N ; ~ _ ` r.,4~~ LIME OR PELLETIZED FERTILIZER SHA ~ , RTILIZER SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO ENTER THE STREAM BANKS. A _ ~ __r - _ _ _ 6. EXCELSIOR MATTING SHALL BE PLACED ON THE 2:1 SLOPES FROM THE TOP OF THE Z
• f W0~ ' LIQUID FERTILIZER SHALL BE USED y~ / ( _ BE USED (OR ALTERNATIVELY, THE FERTILIZER MAY BE DISSOLVED IN CULVERT TO THE ACCESS ROAD SHOULDER. P ° ERMANENT EROSION CONTROL MEASURES
~ A HYDROSEEDER PRIOR TO APPLICATi TO APPLICATION) AND APPLIED ONLY TO THE SLOPES OF THE SHALL BE PLACED IN STREAM CHANNEL AS INDICATED AND REQUIRED TO SUPPORT
i E TEMPORARY. SEDIMENT P~ + 0 S ; ~ N x2.43'12" w CHANNEL MORE THAN TWO FEET ABO NO FEET ABOVE THE BOTTOM OF THE CHANNEL. VEGETATION. a
_ ~ , n 2 TRAP TYP. OF 3 - 1. on , ~ 67.28 FT ( ) . ,
Easement No. 1 e ~ INSTALLATION OF THE EROSION CONT R150.00 , F" n ZOSION CONTROL TURF REINFORCEMENT SHALL BEGIN AT THE TOP OF ~
0.44 Acre t Found 6 - JRING THE MATERIAL IN A 12-INCH DEEP BY 6-INCH WIDE TRENCH, H
f 8' OR 1 " Sf THE CHANNEL BY ANCHORING THE M P 9~~.~ ~ Poplar Tree Q - qt- - E3ACKFILLED AND COMPACTED IMMEDI~ CTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER INSTALLATION. EACH ROLL SHALL BE w
68 L.F. 48 _--APPROXIMATE L " _ ~ v~ ~ ~ OVERLAPPED AT LEAST 6-INCHES. 2-48 FLARED END SECTIO - , ~...w,, i-INCHES. °
u o _ _ _ / - ~ ~w. ~ - - M A 4.07 s _ ~
\ ~ IF ANY STAPLES BECOME LOOSENED _ _ _ _ OP MANHOLE Rlfr+ _ s : svv~.. ~ ' ~ % , _ - _ _ _ LOOSENED OR RAISED, OR IF ANY MATTING BECOMES LOOSE, TORN, OR
~ =540-7`~ - • ~ ~ \ ~ - ~ CHAIN LINK FE UNDERMINED, REPAIRS SHALL BE MAI .HALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY.
NEW 48 INV. . ' NEW 48" RCP END NOT , ~ 4 ' ~ - - _ ELEV. 536.30 INV. 533.00 ACCESSIB RYEGRASS (LODUM MULTIFLORUM) SF _ , fIFLORUM SHALL BE SOWN AT TH RA E TE OF APPROXIMATELY 2 POUNDS FOR
_ - s EVERY 1,000 SQ. FT. OF EROSION C _ . ~ = EROSION CONTROL TURF REINFORCEMENT. IN NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL
~ ~ ~ ~ - FESCUE OR ANY OTHER SEED SPECIE SEED SPECIES BE ALLOWED TO ENTER THE CHANNEL. TOWN SHALL PLANT
B ~ CULVERT INLET ~ ~ SPRIGS OF TAG ELDER (ALNUS RUGC aW ,ALNUS RUGOSA OR ALNUS SERRULATA) OR BLACK WILLOW (SAIJX NIGRA) AT
~ ' ` ` ti EXIST. 48 CM ~ 2 PR ECTION TYP. ~ I ~ ' ~ THE RATE OF APPROXIMATELY ONE P Oc ATELY ONE PLANT FOR EVERY 10 SQ. FT. ON THE CHANNEL SLOPES.
( ) , ~ TO BE REMOVED 'FD. DOT STON D 0
B ROAD ~ TION i ~ SILT SCREEN 2 ~ ~ , ~ I ~1 OTHER VEGETATIVE SPECIES MAY BE IES MAY BE USED WITH PRIOR APPROVAL OF DWQ. N ~
1 AT CULVERT ~ / / ~ ~ _ Found: 7 8" -Iron Rebars 6 ~ A
40 ~ / r of the _ ~ ~ ~ / at three corne s . V W
~ ~ . ~ 1 ; ~ / Pumping Station Lot _ - Vt
, 1 ~ _ I _ , ! ~ ~ ~ 0 i i V i ~ ~ i ~
/ V S 1 / ~ I ~ Q I I a p _ ~ I i i
~ / EXIST. GRAVEL ' I ~ ~ Z W
~ . ° , ~ i DRIVEWAY 540 _ _ ~ 0 ~ ~ 5601 i I I I ~ ~ ~
Set: 3/4" Iron Rebar ~ 's _ ~ ~ _ ~ 560 ~ ~ ~
North = 578,357.66 FT w J g~ , I ~ _ 1 if - _ Eost = 1,722,477.60 FT ~ I - . ~I Curve en th = 15 .00 I ( / N ~ 9 I ~ i - 11.26 ~ C
o I ~ EXIST. 15 CPP i I - i / ~ ~ ! = 2.50 I ~
CLEARING ~ ~ I TO BE REMOVE ~ urve Len th = 100. ~ _ _ _ 9 ' ~ O W ;n th = 100.00 I I ~ W 9 ~ t E ~ I V
- , ~ - _ _ r K = 2.70 e~ - I _3; 3 0 • TEMPORARY DIVERSION C - - 2.70 I ~ ~ ~ ~ V I ~ !
~ ~ ; ~ o ~ I 555 E = 0.55 ~i L + ' , ~ ~ ~ DITCH (TYP.) 2 . _ , Set: ' ~ h ~ ~ I _ = 0.55 i j 555 Z - V ~ E W
IJ I _ a ~ I ~m
- . .~Rebar ; , N ~ _ p u- e-,2.00 ~2, ri rn I o E
_ ~ S ~ - ~ ~ ~ : _ I - - 50 - 0 ~ + / ~ I ~ ~ + ~ O N ! j O
~ ~ ~ ~ d• - ~ ~ ~ ,-i I I ~ 550! o r ~ °o~ / ~ ~ V~ ~r rn ~
,„~O I I h J I J ook 491 P e S_-' _ Easement No. 2 N _ 0 00 , ~ •r II I ! 550 W
er ~ ~ - ~2 I 0.19 Acre t _ - I o ~ n I a o Z C + ! On H N~N~ ~ I / I O
rzv ~ ~ , o . ~e N; ~ 0 II II II II ~ ? ~ ~
, i,; I I II II o / ~ I ~ ~ \ _ ~ f'` .,•y0 I I TEMP. CONSTRUCTION A i Q > , 1 ~ ~ ~ I o_ ! ~ Q O d ~JQ~ I > ~ ~ ~ ! m
\ ~ ~ J II II ~ y I ENTRANCE (TYP.) 2 ~ w II p O~ ~ i ~ cn w w I
y ^ I 545 Q > i ~ fi Q p to > - - ~ ~ 545 PROJECT NUMBER .
; 06059-06
I as II p ' ~ I > > ' DESIGNED BY
/ ~ ~ ~ \ Uwh E Q > ~ ~ 1 I
~ Deed \ ~ \ t ~ I i ! LWP rn w ~ E ~ ~ i i
. ~ F \ \ 540 ~ I- ~ I ~ ( i ! 540 DRAWN BY
~ \ ~ > > ' \ ~ + MRS
i \ I \ ~ i / i I I ~ ~ ~ !
\ , o CURVE DATA \ i ~ ~ ~ CHECKED BY ! ! I 1 ~
i i I ( ~ i I1111P
Radius = 60296 FT ' \
/ arc = 50.01 FT \ 535 NEW 48 RCP INV. L 534.93 I i SCALE - - 535
Q Chord Information Z or N .73'0844 W I AS NOTED
50.00 FT 0 DATE
Ln to I L
F _ \ O 0 Lo O~ t0 0- 0 CO APRIL 2006 Lo C6 6
c +LO 530: oLO + Lo 0 0 ± 0 v7 N; M' Ln ~r 530
0+00 .a 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00
P:\06059-06\ Dw s .REVSITE-i.dw 1:1 of

auu
END OL L N ION 3 RO D A IN RA
4" THICK 3 BERM ~J ~ FINISH IN CHANNELS, ROLL OUT STRIPS OF MATTING PARALLEL TO \ . • ~
,r FLOOD STORAGE ZONE #57 STONE THE DIRECTION OF FLOW AND OVER THE PROTECTIVE MULCH ~v:' ~ '~s GRADE ~ ~ ; ~ s v?
:a ~ ~
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EXIT, / EXISTING TREE LINE RIP-RAP CHANNEL SEDIMENT STORAGE ZONE _ . - MATTING NORTH , y syy ~ r ,
u~ AMERICAN GREEN %
a ~h MODEL C-1 ~~'~dO • ~ ~ FLOW 25 h ~
EXISTING FENCES _ OR EQUAL ,ni n,
EXCELSIOR MATTING ~ INVERT PIPE
1 , 8 5 MIN 5' MIN.
DRAINAGE COURSE
~-3 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP (TST)
SECTION ~ SECTION A-A
-"~'u~ EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR z
NW o ~
Z
PROPOSED GRADE CONTOUR I RIP RAP APRON OUTLET PROTECTION (RRA)
INVERT PIPE
CULVERT (C)
A INSTALL STAPLES EVERY FOUR F A EET IN
CULVERT INLET PROTECTION (CIP) FLOW LINE, ALTERNATING EVERY TWO
CONSTRUCTION/CLEARING LIMITS ~ ~ FEET ON EITHER SIDE. INSTALL STAPLES
< ~ ~ EVERY FOUR FEET ALONG TOP EDGES a
STANDARD DOT ROCK SILT SCREEN, STONE CHECK DAM
CENTER LINE FLOW ~ ~ - STAPLE ~ J N
(TYP) ~
N
TBM TEMPORARY BENCH MARK n n » ~ w Q CLASS B 18 OVERLAP (TYP) U Z
R PROPERTY LINE (I~ yr RIP-RAP Z Q -
W n.oc~
wQ~
~-TDD TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH (TDD) SECTION NUMBER OR DETAIL LETTER UU~
~ ~ Z ~ W2~
ABC NOTE: DIMENSIONS ARE MINIMUM UNLESS ~ ~ ~
OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER. SEDIMENT FENCE 123 JOIN STRIPS BY ANCHORING O ~
SHEET NUMBER (WHERE SECTION/DETAIL APPEARS PLAN AND OVERLAPPING AS SHOWN . O Z PLAN U
OR WHERE SECTION/DETAIL WAS TAKEN FROM) ' w`~ ¦ ANCHOR MATTING IN ~ O
TSD-2 TEMPORARY SLOPE DRAIN (TSD) CULVERT INLET P T CTI RO E " Z ~ ROTECTION 6 TRENCH (TYP ~
B ) O W m
NO SCALE w
J ~ CE A NG
GRADING & EROSION CONTROL GENERAL NOTES: F . Q
NO SCALE
1. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEEDING SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN 30 DAYS FOLLOWING LAND
DISTURBANCE. SEE EROSION CONTROL DETAIL
SHEET FOR SEEDING REQUIREMENTS AND 0
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE. a
2. SEE EROSION CONTROL DETAIL SHEET FOR
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP AND CULVERT OUTLET STABILIZATION SIZING. m
3. EXCELSIOR MATTING SHALL BE PLACED IN „ ~ 12 THICK LAYER OF
DITCHES AND OTHER AREAS THAT EXHIBIT #57 WASHED STONE °
MULCH DISPLACEMENT FROM VELOCITY SCOUR. 5.0' 2:1 SLOPE MIN.
1:1 SIDE SLOPE (TYP)
2:1 SLOPE • 5.0 MAX. _ z
6-0_ -
RIP-RAP 1800 CU fT ACRE ~ ~ - - ~ r..n' Y . F
2' MIN. a
LEVEL NATURAL GROUND BASE LENGTH FILTER FABRIC ~
COMPACTED SOIL CROWN U
FROM DITCH EXCAVATION BERM 1.5' MIN. SECTION A-A ~
(PLACE ON 12" THICK LAYER OF W
LOWER SIDE °
#57 WASHED STONE OF DITCH) 21" MIN.
Q~ ~ DITCH 2:1 SIDE SLOPE MAX.
~ l I .1 F~Ow .1 2. 2:1 SLOPE ~ 0,. 2.1 DAM 6
OR FLATTER WEIR " z HEIGHT '
\ , 1.5
6.0 \ ~ EMERGENCY BY-PASS ~
SECTION A-A c " " - Mme' DEPTH " CLASS B RIP RAP 6 BELOW TOP OF TRAP a
W
NOTE: THE DIVERTED RUNOFF SHOULD BE RELEASED THROUGH A C 0 ~
STABLIZED OUTLET, SLOPE DRAIN, OR SEDIMENT TRAPPING MEASURE. = 3 ~ ~ 1:1 SIDE 1:1 SIDE SLOPE (TYP) 0
~o - J FlLTER 3.0 SLOPE N ~ a
~ ~ DITCH FABRIC MIN. MAX. W N
IVERSIO TD ANEN PERM TEMPORARY C so, TOP OF A NATURAL GROUND V A W BASE WIDTH W
F' NO SCALE ~J ~i,L BANK Vs
D V SECTION B-B
Q 0 J
Z W O B
B B ~
v 6' THICK MIN. OF ~ ~ LL ~ ~ ~ F-
2-3' COARSE STONE a ~ , ~ d ~
L S EEDI
z 0 O W A A
SEEDING MIXTURE: ; ~V V
SPECI S RAT LB. ACRE , ~ TOP OF Z BANK W ~ Z
TALL FESCUE 100
KOREAN LESPEDEZA 40 BASE OF DITCH
BERMUDA (HULLED) 15 NOTES: N o V1
NOTE: A A y ~ 0
BETWEEN MAY 1 AND AUG. 20, ADD 10 LBS./ACRE GERMAN ~ A STABILIZED PAD OF CRUSHED STONE SHALL BE LOCATED WHERE TRAFFIC WILL P W •E+ TOP OF Z C ~
MILLET. BETWEEN AUG. 15 AND MAY 1, ADD 40 LBS./ACRE BE ENTERING OR LEAVING A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO OR FROM A PUBLIC STREET. TOP OF RYE GRAIN . BETWEEN SEPT. 1 AND OCT. 25 OVERSEED WITH IF THIS LOCATION IS SUBJECT TO SEEPAGE OR HIGH WATER TABLE STABILIZE BANK BANK ~ 0 W
( ) 10 LBS./ACRE OF KOBE LESPEDEZA. FOUNDATION WffH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC. N
B ~ ~ IRAP PLAN m
SEEDING DATES: 2 THIS ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT ~
AUGUST 20 -OCTOBER 25 TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS OR EXISTING F DAM HEIGHT PROJECT NUMBER
- Y 1 PAVEMENT. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE FEBRUARY 1 MA 3 ~ 3.0' MAX. - 1.5' MIN. 06059-06
AS CONDITIONS DEMAND AND REPAIR AND/OR CLEANOUT OF ANY MEASURES SEDIMENT TRAP SCHEDULE (SEE NOTE BELOW) DES90NED BY
D TO TRAP SEDIMENT. EXISTING ~ ( SOIL AMENDMENTS: USE DISTURBED REQUIRED TRAP BASE BASE LWP
APPLY AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE AT 2-3 TONS/ACRE GRADE TRAP N0. AREA ACRE VOLUME CU. FT. LENGTH FT. DEPTH (FT.) WEIR (FT.) BASE OF DITCH ~ ) ( ) ( ) WIDTH (FT.)
FERTILIZER - 1,000 LBS. ACRE - 10-10-10 3 ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC STREETS BASE OF DIT~ / SUPERPHOSPHATE - 500 LBS. ACRE - 20% ANALYSIS MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. DRAWN BY TST-1 0.2 360 30 16 2.0 4.0
/ _ _ _ SECTION B B MULCH 2 TONS/ACRE SMALL GRAIN STRAW R ~@ MRS
4 WHEN NECESSARY, WHEELS MUST BE CLEANED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIO TO ANCHOR -ASPHALT EMULSION AT 300 GAL./ACRE WASHING IS RE UIRED IT SHALL BE DONE TST-2 0.2 360 30 16 2.0 4.0
ENTRING A PUBLIC STREET. WHEN Q , TST-3 0.3 54 CHEq(ED BY 0 30 16 3.0 4.0
ON AN EREA STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE WHICH DRAINS INTO AN MULCH: APPROVED SEDIMENT BASIN. LWP
. T„ ~ , ,.T.,.,., ~.~T Nt7TF~ fvlAXltulll~l HFIhHT (1F IIAM THAI I RF N~ ~1 I I RF N~ 1~(1RF THAN
At-rLT 4,000 IL) 0,000 Lt1/AUML UMAIIV I MAW UM tWLAVALUN I I,VVLR. SCALE W LEVEL WIDTH OF
ANCHOR MULCH BY TACKING WITH ASPHALT, ROVING OR NETTING. ONE FOOT ABOVE NORMAL FLOW LEVEL. WII OF DAM SHALL BE NO LESS THAN WIDTH C 'HMI WIDTH OF DITCH. AS NOTED
ENTRANCE/EXIT CONSTRUCTION TEMPORARY MAINTENANCE. GRAVEL A DATE
REFERTILIZE IN THE SECOND YEAR UNLESS GROWTH IS FULLY NO SCALE STANDARD DOT STONE SILT Si
ADEQUATE. MAY BE MOWED ONCE OR TWICE A YEAR. RESEED, SEDIMENT TRA APRIL 2006 SILT SCREE N TEMPORARY D E
FERTILIZE AND MULCH DAMAGED AREAS IMMEDIATELY. NO SCALE NO SCALE
P: 006059-06 Dw a .REVSITE-1dw 1:1
i

MONTGOMERY COUNTY, 1~ NORTH CAROLINA
X059-06
PROJECT N0. 060
APRIL 2006 )6
SHEET INDEX '""'c"""
_ ~Ira"'~c\'~= 'rra~ ~~s ~ SERI. i> ~
~F 1995 i 0439 r e PROJECT AREA
SHEET N0. =;S~r ~nv ,~,R~ 3',c 's ~ qa~..•' o`",'
~j~/~
1 ACCESS ROAD ,•~''w,,,,,~* ° ~ w; PEra'~,,, N
2 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
TROY NG ~0. ~p9
TF~¦TE CIVIL ENVIRONMENTA 401 COMMERCE PLACE C H TROY ~
TAL, PC CEN ER S
;E TRITECH
ASHEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA, 27 [phone] A, 27203 ,05'
M
WWW.TRITECHGVIL.COM
VICINITY MAP

4
RIGHT OF WAY LEGEND 1 3J .
DISTANCE FROM EDGE OF TROY-IDX-CONTOURS (ROAD) ~•'QV~r"~ S.'
R/W TO ROAD CENTERLINE VARIES TROY-INT-CONTOURS (ROAD) j ~ t ~ ~ ~
EXIST. IDX CONTOURS : < :a < ' a, .V.af
545 545 _ _ EXIST. INT coNrouRS : W N : 3 ~ ~ ;y ~s~ ; ~d a~~:
4' 24' OF S 9.5 6 ASPHALT, 2" THICK 4' 6~ •,r~..,, ~ '•,,Di y
SHOULDER SHOULDER DITCH
1 4" PER FT. 1/4" PER FT. "
„ / --i • 1 PER FT. ~ 1 PER FT. 54 CONST R UCTIO N SE UENCE 540
4: 2 ~ i
48" END 48" END 1. DESIGN COMPLETED USING BASE DRAWING PROVIDED BY SITE 1. OBTAIN EROSION CONTROL PERMIT.
8° COMPACTED AGGREGATE " - SECTION SECTION UTILITY & DESIGN SERVICES. 2. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, TEMPORARY
R ROAD 6 (TYP. BC BASE COURSE UNDE TYP. BOTH ENDS SEDIMENT TRAPS, AND PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL ~ ( )
535 . s~ TI - C 535 2. GRAY WAILS (910-572-3661) IS CONTACT WITH TOWN OF DEVICES. o ~ TROY. 3. REQUEST INSPECTION FOR PERIMETER INSTALLED
AD 0 L IC A ~R EROSION CONTROL DEVICES. F
NO SCALE - - ~o - 3. CONCRETE OR CORRUGATED ALUMINUM END SECTIONS SHALL 4. CLEAR AND GRUB SITE.
48" RCP ~ 48" CP 5. INSTALL REMAINDER OF EROSION CONTROL DEVICES. 8" CP ~ ~ BE PLACED AT BOTH ENDS OF 48" CULVERT.
INV.=536.3 . INV. 533.0 6. REMOVE EXISTING 48" CMP. JV. 533.0
• 530 . .................-----0+00 - ...............1 +00 530 4. WETLANDS IMPACT (DETERMINATION BY U.S. CORPS OF 7. GRADE SITE (LAND DISTURBING PROCEDURES).
1+00 ENGINEERS) IS 35 FEET IN WIDTH (17.5 FEET ON BOTH 8. INSTALL 48° RCP, END SECTIONS, AND TURF
PUMPING STATION LINE BEARING DISTANCE SIDES OF CENTERLINE OF CULVERT) FOR THE ENTIRE LENGTH REINFORCEMENT.
L1 S 43'16'15" E 87.60 FT OF THE NEW CULVERT. 9. MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL DEVICES, A MINIMUM a OF WEEKLY AND AFTER EVERY RAIN. M
N EC I ROAD L2 S 46 43 45 W 60.00 FT B 10. SEED AND VEGETATE STREAM CHANNEL WHERE TURF " O
L3 N 43'16'15" W 13.33 FT REINFORCEMENT IS INSTALLED. J N
N 43'16'15" W 24.22 FT CU L4 A 11. LAND DISTURBING PROCEDURES COMPLETED AND ~ N
L5 N 43'16'15" W 50.05 FT ABC / ' o / p ~ ~ ~ 1 " , . Set: / Q \ p0 ~ H 1 =50 V 1 -5 SITE STABILIZED. wQ
L6 N 46 43 45 E 21.20 FT 3 4" cart' ~ / 0 / ~ 12. REMOVE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES. U 13. REQUEST FINAL INSPECTION FOR EROSION CONTROL Q ?
L7 N 46 43 45' E 38.80 FT Rebar / Q J ~ ~ / Z JJO ACCEPTANCE. W ~ O tD
SEWER LINE DATA ~ 18 t ~ / / ~ ~ / S~ ' ~ ~O
LINE BEARING DISTANCE ~ , o / j 0 / , WQ~
L8 N 62'40'33" W 60.61 FT ~6 o Q~ ; ~ / 5 , / L9 S 81'5743" W 196.86 FT 1 ~ `L •o•/ .0 / ' \ UU~ Z~
" W 196.82 FT ; ~ k. L10 S 89 04 55 W=~
I ~ / 2 / . " 4.47 FT t I 60 , " ~ L11 N 71 42 40 W 17 _ ~ _ ~ / •p, ~ / LGN LN
W 322.23 FT ~ 1 ~ ~ / . ~ / O ,r', ? \'L L12 N 8812 46 ~ ~o^ ~ ~ . OZM
/ i~' L13 N 44'55 58" E 103.18 FT XCELSIOR MATTING I / - / a. ~ F E ~ r DEED B K 554 / ~ ~ U ~
L14 N 02'13'20" W 141.95 FT ~ p ; I ~ I ` 2 IN DITCH `(TYP.) l pq ~ / / ' = G ALL PERMANENT MEASURES SHALL BE 1. THE TOWN SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS TO AVOID THE SILTING OF STREAMS, ~ O :S SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION LAKES, OR OTHER WATER SOURCES DUE TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. O ~
L15 N 02 34 33 W 132.96 FT ~ . _ ~ ~ / / ~ _ r i ' r~ / / Z ~O
Ll6 N 52'10'57" E 119.06 FT i ~ ~ ~ \ r ~ - 5 SCHEDULE. SEEDING OF THE SITE WIT I ~ 0 ( 'HE SITE (WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE STREAM CHANNEL) SHALL BE BASED W 2. EFFECTIVE EROSKNI CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INITIATED PRIOR TO THE COM- tb
1 ON THE SEEDING SCHEDULE. TURF RE LE. TURF REINFORCEMENT MATTING SHALL BE PLACED IN THE STREAM w TIONS FOR THE FULL MENCEMENT OF CLEARING. GRADING, EXCAVATING, OR OTHER OPERATIONS THAT WILL 2
~ ~ _ / ~ ANNE IMMEDIATELY UPSTRAM & DO New Road Easement . J. , _ - - i / CH L STRAM & DOWNSTREAM OF THE CULVERT END SEC J N DISTURB THE NATURAL PROTECTION. THE EROSION CONTROL DETAILS SHOWN HEREIN
- I s - / , - EXTENT OF CHANNEL DISTURBANCE. TF / 0 o ; ~URBANCE. THE EXISTING CHANNEL SWILL BE WIDENED TO THE DIMENSIONS ARE FOR REFERENCE. THE DETERMINATION OF WHICH DETAIL IS APPLICABLE AS THE Q
1 _ / ~ - INDICATED AND STABILIZED USING ERO 1 LINE BEARING DISTANCE ~ - f / ' D USING EROSION CONTROL TURF RE~lFbRCEMENT. SLOPE STABILIZATION WORK PROGRESSES SHALL BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER. N NT UV
1. _ I s I - / ~ WOODS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY NORTH AMERI HAM RIC PES AND BOTTOM 3. ALL TRENCHES SHALL BE STABILIZED AS SOON AS IS PRACTICAL TO MINIMIZE EROSION.
U7 N 12'S9'o6" w 254.55 FT ~ I TABILI POLY PY NET WITH / 0: JE NET WITH FIBER MATTING OR EQUAL THE CWWNEL SLO
SHALL BE PREPARED, AND THE EROSI( L18 N 77'00'54" E 45.00 FT - ~ " / ` ~ THE EROSION CONTROL MATTING SWILL BE INSTALLED ON THE CHANNEL WHEN WORK IS TO CEASE FOR OVERNIGHT OR LONGER, THE OPEN TRENCHES SHALL BE LEFT SO AS TO PREVENT WATER IN THE TRENCH DUE TO RAIN OR OTHER CAUSES °
- ~ < / , ~ BOTTOM AND SLOPE IN STRICT ACCORI \rown of Tioy y ~ 554 _ TRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE MATERIAL MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS, a FROM BEING CHANNELED INTO A CREEK, LAKE, ROADSIDE DITCH, ETC. UPON START UP ~
. ~ WITH THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS C } : L19 S 12 59 06 E 204.14 FT NORTH Troy siness l~eriter ~ , )IFICATIONS OR STIPULATIONS: OF WORK AGAIN, ALL WATER IN THE TRENCH SHALL BE PUMPED INTO A STONE FILTER
eed B 369 Papa 501 - _ . ~ - ~ o 15" INV. 550.00--- INA ~ CAROL a TRENCH AS DETAILED HEREIN. }
L20 S 12°59'06" E 58.97 FT Tat Cabinet f~Slids 165-A j ~ o . THE EROSION CONTROL NET SHALL BE '~ET SHALL BE ANCHORED WITH "U" SHAPED 9-GAUGE WIRE m
GRID NORTH ~ t~ - ~ - STAPLES WITH A MINIMUM TOP WIDTH , WIDTH OF ONE INCH AND LENGTH OF EIGHT INCHES. 4. THE TOWN SHALL AVOID THE PLACEMENT OF ANY MATERIAL OVER ANY EROSION TOP CONTROL DEVICE WHILE IT IS IN USE.
L21 S 62'43'12" E 73.56 FT ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ " " NAD 83 . ~ , STAPLE PATTERN E (3.8 STAPLES/YC ~ ~ ~ _ STAPLES/YD.) SHALL BE EMPLOYED. AN ADDITIONAL TWO ~
A TYPICAL ROAAD • ' _ t ~ / ~ ROWS OF STAPLES APPROXIMATELY FO R INCHES ROWS AND STAPLES APART IN A 5. THE TOWN HAL I P T ° )XIMATELY FOU ( ) S L NS EC ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AT THE END OF
L22 N 46'43'45" E 106.96 FT _ . G3 ;;4. O t' SECT ~ ti STAGGERED PATTERN SHALL BE INSTAI .;.~Z ti ~ y LL BE INSTALLED FOR A DISTANCE OF TEN FEET IMMEDIATELY EACH WORK DAY, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN A GOOD STATE OF REPAIR, UNTIL THE USE
. ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ! - DOWNSTf~iAM OF THE CULVERT END S L23 S 431615 E 45.00 FT - _VERT END SECTION. OF THE DEVICES ARE NO LONGER WARRANTED. AT THIS TIME THE DEVICES SHALL BE
' p % ~ , - - / 0 REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF SO AS TO CAUSE NO STREAM SILTATION.
i ' - - _ ~ r ~ 640 . _ _ - LIME L24 S 46'43'45" W 100.00 FT N~"~_~~ A1,LAW~} _ ~ A . EX ~ MATTIN 6 CELS~ft ~ „JPT OM TJMI <2~1 ~ 1'IItN~I Tlf 1~ OF THE
• ~ WOODS LJQUID TILIZE SHALL BE USED (01 '1.12 , _ BE USED OR ALTERNATNELY, THE LJZER MAY BE DISSOLVED IN CU VERT ~ THE AC ~ ROAD SHOULDER. PER ~ ( L jQ MANENT EROSION CONTROL MEASURES
:I; 5 ~ ; ~ ~ ~ - A HYDROSEEDER PRIOR TO APPLICATIC 0 APPLICATION AND APPLIED ONLY TO THE SLOPES OF THE SWILL BE PLACED IN STREAM CHANNEL AS INDICATED AND REQUIRED TO SUPPORT ~
' ~ - _ - Sta ! ~ ~ » . - _ _ CHANNEL MORE THAN TWO FEET ABOV J FEET ABOVE THE BOTTOM OF THE CHANNEL. VEGETATION. a
"E -S~tME7~- ~ 0 N s2 4312 w P ~ , _ on ~ s~.2s ~T ,
2 _ TRAP . OF 3 " ~ , _ - INSTALLATION OF THE EROSION CONTRi )SIGN CONTROL TURF REINFORCEMENT SHALL BEGIN AT THE TOP OF ~
Easement No. 1 8150.00 ' » Found 6 _ - . - - ' , . ~ c~~ 1 _ THE CHANNEL BY ANCHORING THE MA , ZING THE MATERAL IN A 12-INCH DEEP BY 6-INCH WIDE TRENCH, a
0.44 Acre t t .Poplar Tree 8 OR 1Q _ t BACKFILLED AND COMPACTED IMMEDIAT _ Q ! ~ ' , -APPRbXIMATE L fED IMMEDIATELY AFTER INSTALLATION. EACH ROLL SHALL BE m
68 L . 48 ~ , ~ OVERLAPPED AT LEAST 6-INCHES. -INCHES. °
- • ~ . 2 48 FLARED END SEC . - - ' ~ i - uo ~ ~
M ~ 4.Q , ~ • - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ - - IF ANY STAPLES BECOME LOOSENED C LOOSENED OR RAISED, OR IF ANY MATTWG BECOMES LOOSE, TORN, OR
- OP MANHOIf RIIrI ~ ' ~ ~ CHANT LINK FE _ - - - - - - UNDERMINED, REPAIRS SHALL BE MADI _ TALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. ~
-540rT~'' - M , ~ ~ ~ i ~
- - ' - 4 RCP END NOT NEW 48' INV. ~ NEW 8 RA LOLIUM MULTIFLORUM SHA ~ ~ ~ RYEG SS ( ) FLORUM) SHALL BE SOWN AT THE RATE OF APPROXIMATELY 2 POUNDS FOR
ELEV. 536.30 _ INV. 533.00 ACCESSIB - - ! ~ s EVERY 1,000 SQ. FT. OF EROSION CO EROSION CONTROL TURF REINFORCEMENT. IN NO CIRCUMSTANCES SWILL ~
~ ~ ~ ~ , - _ - _ - FESCUE OR ANY OTHER SEED SPECIE. TEED SPECIES BE ALLOWED TO ENTER THE CHANNEL TOWN SHALL PUINT a
/ _ SPRIGS OF TAG ELDER (ALNUS RUGOS W ~LNUS RUGOSA OR ALNUS SERRULATA) OR BLACK WILLOW (SALIX NK~tA) AT ~ C
B ~ CULVERT INLET , / ~ ti EXIST. 48 CM IMATELY ONE PL ~ ~ THE RATE OF APPROX TELY ONE PLANT FOR EVERY 10 SQ. FT. ON THE CHANNEL SLOPES. ~
2 PR CTION (TYP.) ~ TO BE REMOVED 'f!D. DOT STON D • , A 0
SILT SCREEN 2 OTHER VEGETATNE SPECIES MAY BE U ~ ~ .S MAY BE USED WITH PRIOR APPROVAL OF DWQ. W
B ROAD TION I r / / . ~ ! Found: ~/8 --iron Re6drs V
1 AT CULVERT ~ , , _ _ ~~G I / / ~ at three corners of the W Vr
_ ~ T5T- i _ . / . n Lot , . ~ Pumping Statio ~ D
~ / _ ~ , { _ i ~ a
• _ ' 'i / ~'`~j I ao O I ~ ~ ~ z
S ~ / / ~ EXIST. GRAVEL ~ I I E ~ W i I w
, _ , o . / ~ DRIVEWAY 540 I - 560 f i ( I ¦ ~ I !560 ,y!+
Set: 3/4" Iron Rebar E ~ T N ! ~ Curve en = 15~ .00 / ~ C
1• North = 578,357.66 FT y„~ y _ . - - 9th ~ ~ = 11.26 / ! ~ ~
_ ~1 al 477.60 FT East = 1,722, - ~ ~ EXIST. 15" CPP - h ~ ~ _ _ _ i urve Len th = 100.0 I ~ =2.50 ~ 0 W W
q~j~, b I h ~ TO BE REMOVE g i th = 100.00 ! 9 ~ F'
_ - . - ~ ~ _ ~ K = 270 ` ~ -,:r ~ 3 .o• TEMPORARY DIVERSION C 3 _ _ . 5551 E = 0.55 - i ~ - 270 Z _ I i ~ 555
g ~ ~ O'~ ~ 1_ - ~ ~ ~ - DITCH (TYP.) 2 - 0.55 W~ ~ ~ a
I ~ ` , Set:' ~ Nflf~ /J I - - i - -r.._ R PO 7 ~ Iron ~~n I ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ V m
/8 de. ~ ri I ~ 2. ~ i ~ ~ ~ V~
- ~ ,Rebar N i N . O ! \ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ + / 0 } M o ~ N V~ p~
S ~ _ _ ' ? rn ~ : ~ V I I b ~ 550 ~ \ a r O t ~ ~ ~ / C~ oa , • I W
~ ~ r I 1 { I ~ 550 0 ~ o fp 1 I~ J I J o ~ I ~ 550 C Z
ook X91 ~ • Easement No. 2 _ _ + N Page 669) ~ ~ , ~ I 0.19 Acre t _ I O N O n Q ~ j I FQ- ~C ~ ~ 0 o ~ n ~ iA ~ ~ V1
r Drzve ~ v + ~ • A u, i t~ ~ N N N II I- I
~ ~ a` I I ~ N N o~ ~ r ~ 0 I ~ TEMP. -CONSTRUCTION A Q> 00 ~ V a m o > >
\ ~ ~ ~ N N N ~ o~ NJ w
y I ENTRANCE {TYP.) 2 i u7 w Q ' g ~ I 545 > ~ ~ ~ 545 PROJECT NUMBER Q>
W ~ ~ ~ ~ 06059-06 I
~ ~ , ~ ~ ! II II ~ I DESIGNED BY
\ s. I / ~ ~ uwn I . _ i I Q > / ~ LWP
~ ~ _ ~ _ Deed f I i nw / ~
i ~ \ \ ~ ~ 540 ~ ~ ~ I + !540 DRAWN BY
~ n ~ ~ I MRS > \ ; I
~ !F _ / i t ~ I I CHECKED BY
I / I i I ~ ! ~ LWP
- ~ ~ rrm~e neTe ~ ~ i I i
J~p GRadoua =80296 FT
\ Q / Arc 3' M0I FT \ 535 NEW 48 RCP- INV. Ia. 534.93 '535 SCALE
ti Q , Chord Information AS NOTED
A r N 73'0844 W ` 50.00 FT \ DATE E
^ Q1 Lo ~ rn Lq j
¢j .D h O L 0 to APRIL 2006 ' i°n ri r+~ to n o r~ M
+to ac/~ 530 0 + n 1* t + ~ + Lo ~ ~ + ~ 30 oU ~L NLn to ~ ~ ~un 5
° \ 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 P: 06059-06 Dw s ,REVSf1E-1,dw 1:1
.a

••I/IHI 1111/1j///I i ,
D TROL LEGEN CON ROSI AND DIN G BERM 3~'a, o
3 4" THICK 3 IN CHANNELS, ROLL OUT STRIPS OF MATTING PARALLEL TO \ ~ ~ FINISH THE DIRECTION OF FLOW AND OVER THE PROTECTIVE MULCH ~~Ov:'
FLOOD STORAGE ZONE #57 STONE GRADE ; ; .Q .a.
sv;~ c ; 3 c
' CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EXIT, / ~ EXISTING TREE LINE RIP-RAP CHANNEL SEDIMENT STORAGE ZONE MATTING NORTH ~ N S
• r~: ,t ~ AMERICAN GREEN .~r~,'•.,,• • ~
~ : a MODEL C-125 '•,,ON , FLOW OR EQUAL 1••`•
~ A EXISTING FENCES EXCELSIOR MATTING ' t~~ ~ 11111 1 111
INVERT PIPE
1' 8' 3' 5' MIN.
DRAINAGE COURSE
~-3 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP (TST} I
SECTI SECTION A-A r
EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR U W
o
, ~
X78 j PROPOSED GRADE CONTOUR I ~ RIP-RAP APRON OUTLET PROTECTION (RRA)
I J INVERT PIPE
CULVERT (C)
A INSTALL STAPLES EVERY FOUR FEET IN ` A FLOW LINE, ALTERNATING EVERY TWO
CULVERT INLET PROTECTION CIP ( ) . r FEET ON EITHER SIDE. INSTALL STAPLES
CONSTRUCTION/CLEARING LIMITS F .~~~,r EVERY FOUR FEET ALONG TOP EDGES ,3 a
STANDARD DOT ROCK SILT SCREEN i ' STONE CHECK DAM M FLOW " O
CENTER LINE fl fl - STAPLE J N
r _ (TYP) ~ ~ N
TBM TEMPORARY BENCH MARK ~ ~ w
Q CLASS B 18 OVERLAP (TYP) U Z
R PROPERTY LINE (R) Z Q- RIP-RAP J J O
W aOtO ~O
~-TDD TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH (TDD) WQ~
SECTION NUMBER OR DETAIL LETTER UU~ 1_. ap
Z ~ ~ W=rn
ABC NOTE: DIMENSIONS ARE MINIMUM UNLESS
SEDIMENT FENCE 123 OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER. JOIN STRIP ~ S BY ANCHORING ~ O ~ AND OVERLAPPING AS SHOWN . O Z r~
SHEET NUMBER (WHERE SECTION/DETAIL APPEARS P PLAN ~
OR WHERE SECTION/DETAIL WAS TAKEN FROM) - TSD-2 ' ANCHOR MATTING IN ~ O
TEMPORARY SLOPE DRAIN (TSD) CUL ERT INLET PROTE v " Z ~ ~ PROTECTION 6 TRENCH (TYP) ~ B O
W m
NO SCALE w
J ~ E I MATTI G F . Q
GRADING & EROSION CONTROL GENERAL NOTES: NO SCALE
1. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEEDING SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN 30 DAYS FOLLOWING LAND
DISTURBANCE. SEE EROSION CONTROL DETAIL
SHEET FOR SEEDING REQUIREMENTS AND 0
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE. a
2. SEE EROSION CONTROL DETAIL SHEET FOR m
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP AND CULVERT OUTLET STABILIZATION SIZING.
3. EXCELSIOR MATTING SHALL BE PLACED IN H r 12 THICK LAYER OF c
DITCHES AND OTHER AREAS THAT EXHIBIT #57 WASHED STONE 5 ~ 2:1 SLOPE 0
MULCH DISPLACEMENT FROM VELOCITY SCOUR. MIN.
1:1 SIDE SLOPE (TYP)
2:1 SLOPE ~ Z 5.0 MAX. CLASS B
6'-0" o '~-:%t,;, RIP-RAP
1800 CU FT/ACRE F
2' MIN. NATURAL a
LEVEL GROUND BASE LENGTH =Rf ` = F~fL~R FAgRI~ ' ~
COMPACTED SOIL CROWN FROM DITCH U
EXCAVATION BERM 1.5' MIN.
(PLACE ON 12° THICK LAYER OF MIN. SECTION A-A y W
LOWER SIDE D
X57 WASHED STONE OF DITCH) 21" MIN.
Ql - ~ ~ DITCH 2:1 SIDE SLOPE MAX.
~ P ~ FLOW 2:1 SLOE 'y~ DAM WEIR ~
OR FLATTER HEIGHT ~ _
~ 1.5
6.0' EMERGENCY BY-PASS ~
SECTION A-A " " - Mme' DEPTH 6p BELOW TOP OF TRAP CLASS 6 RIP RAP a W
NOTE: THE DIVERTED RUNOFF SHOULD BE RELEASED THROUGH A 0 C ~
STABLIZED OUTLET, SLOPE DRAIN, OR SEDIMENT TRAPPING MEASURE. ~ 3 ~o J ~ 3 ~ 1:1 SIDE 1:1 SIDE SLOPE (TYP) 0
~ o~ ~ FILTER 3.0 SLOPE y ~ ~ Q
ITCH ION D S IVER ENT D RMAN ~ FABRIC MIN. MAX. W NATURAL GROUND V I"
Y PE PORAR TEM C mac, so- TOP OF A A W BASE WIDTH W
NO SCALE J0~ ~i BANK Q ? VZ
V - ~
Q 0 J
Z W O B
B B ~ ~ ~ _
fi t T Y`.'9-~~ € 6 THICK MIN. OF -/any y ~ H
p 2-3 COARSE STONE C Z . ~ ~
E HED GS S EDI F y 0 Q
~ i`>`r' I t W A A
SEEDING MIXTURE: ,1,~ H V TOP OF Z
SPECIES RATE LB. ACRE BANK W L Z
TALL FESCUE 100 -j m V
KOREAN LESPEDEZA 40 BASE OF DITCH
BERMUDA (HULLED) 15 NOTES: N o to A N
NOTE: A ~ ~ W f+
BETWEEN MAY 1 AND AUG. 20, ADD 10 LBS./ACRE GERMAN 1 A STABILIZED PAD OF CRUSHED STONE SHALL BE LOCATED WHERE TRAFFIC WILL P MILLET. BETWEEN AUG. 15 AND MAY 1, ADD 40 LBS./ACRE BE ENTERING OR LEAVING A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO OR FROM A PUBLIC STREET. TOP OF TOP OF Z C
RYE GRAIN . BETWEEN SEPT. 1 AND OCT. 25 OVERSEED WITH IF THIS LOCATION IS SUBJECT TO SEEPAGE OR HIGH WATER TABLE STABILIZE BANK BANK ~ 0 W
( ) 10 LBS./ACRE OF KOBE LESPEDEZA. FOUNDATION WITH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC. y. - ~
B IRAP PLAN m
2 THIS ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT SEEDING DATES: b
AUGUST 20 -OCTOBER 25 TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS OR EXISTING DAM HEIGHT PROJECT NUMBER
FEBRUARY 1 -MAY 1 PAVEMENT. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE 06059-06 3.0 MAX. - 1.5 MIN.
AS CONDITIONS DEMAND AND REPAIR AND/OR CLEANOUT OF ANY MEASURES SEDIMENT TRAP SCHEDULE (SEE NOTE BELOW) DESIGNED BY
SOIL AMENDMENTS: USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. EXISTING DISTURBED REQUIRED TRAP BASE BASE LWP
APPLY AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE AT 2-3 TONS/ACRE GRADE FERTILIZER - 1,000 LBS./ACRE - 10-10-10 3 ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC STREETS BASE C TRAP N0. DEPTH (FT.) WEIR (FT.) BASE OF DITCH AREA (ACRE) VOLUME (CU. FT.) LENGTH (FT.) WIDTH (FT.)
SUPERPHOSPHATE - 500 LBS. ACRE - 20~ ANALYSIS MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. DRAWN BY TST-1 0.2 360 30 16 2.0 4.0
/ SECTION B-B MULCH - 2 TONS/ACRE -SMALL GRAIN STRAW T P ION B_~ MRS
4 WHEN NECESSARY, WHEELS MUST BE CLEANED TO REMOVE SEDIMEN RIOR TO ANCHOR -ASPHALT EMULSION AT 300 GAL./ACRE NTRING A PUBLIC STREET. WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED IT SHALL BE DONE TST-2 0.2 360 30 16 2.0 4.0 CHECKED BY
E , TST-3 0.3 540 30 16 3.0 4.0
ON AN EREA STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE WHICH DRAINS INTO AN MULCH: APPROVED SEDIMENT BASIN. LWP
. T„ ~ ~ ~ PTf1A1~/ ~.~T ~~„~o NOTE: MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF DAM SHALL BE ~ SHALL BE NO MORE THAN
ArrLT 4,UUU IU 0,000 LO/AUML URHIIV JIRHIY UR r-VVIV/1LUV1 UVVCR. kL FLOW LEVEL. WIDTH OF W
ANCHOR MULCH BY TACKING WITH ASPHALT, ROVING OR NETTING. ONE FOOT ABOVE NORMAL FLOW LEVE OF DAM SHALL BE NO LESS THAN WI AS NOTED .ESS THAN WIDTH OF DITCH.
CONSTRUCTION N IT MAINTENANCE. TEMPORARY GRAVEL A DAZE
REFERTILIZE IN THE SECOND YEAR UNLESS GROWTH IS FULLY NO SCALE
STANDARD DOT STONE IL ADEQUATE. MAY BE MOWED ONCE OR TWICE A YEAR. RESEED, APRIL 2006 )NE IL SCREEN o TEMPORARY SEDIMENT RAP E
FERTILIZE AND MULCH DAMAGED AREAS IMMEDIATELY. NO SCALE NO SCALE
OF P: 006059-06 Dw s .REVSf1E-1dw 1:1

¦
¦
t
NORTH CAROLINA

J

)59-06
s
U
2
,1111111111111,1j•• 111111/11111111/j//•i
SHEET INDEX ENVI ~ pARp
• ~ •Q
u = SEAL ~ ~ ' 3>.
: , 1995 ~ = ; 0439 SHEET N0. :
. ~bINE~;.• G ~i /Q h'•a...••' Q`~ 111 PROJECT AREA
1 ACCESS ROAD •.,'PY pE y W. ,1111j x 111111 '•1.111 1111 . M
I/11111/1 11111 N
CONTROL DETAILS ~ ~L 2 EROSION
TROY
ti~ ,~9 ~
~C 4 ~ 1
~ TROY
?L~ PC CEN ER S
TRITECH
7203 105'
[phone]
WWW.TRITECHCIVIL.COM
VICININ.T.S. MAP-

1 11111,/1I, 'V
RIGHT OF WAY LEGEND ~J
DISTANCE FROM EDGE OF R/W TO ROAD CENTERLINE TROY-IDX-CONTOURS (ROAD) V r a. •
E VARIES TROY-INT-CONTOURS ROAD ' ~ ~ ~ ( ) Or .Q;~ a
- - - - EXIST. IDX CONTOURS S , y :V :Ir :3:
545 545 - EXIST. INT CONTOURS ; •y~~
4' 24' OF S 9.5 B ASPHALT, 2" THICK 4' 6' d0 . P
SHOULDER SHOULDER DITCH H ~ I ~~~~lunl, <i~~,•~•
1 4" PER f7. 1/4" PER FT. " CONSTRUCTION SE UENCE
1 PER FT. 1 PER FT, 540 540 TES NO
4;1 2.
•1 48" END 48° END 1. DESIGN COMPLETED USING BASE DRAWING PROVIDED BY SITE 1. OBTAIN EROSION CONTROL PERMIT.
8" COMPACTED AGGREGATE - SECTION SECTION UTILITY & DESIGN SERVICES. 2. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, TEMPORARY I
(TYP. BOTF BASE COURSE UNDER ROAD 6 TYP. BOTH ENDS SEDIMENT TRAPS, AND PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL ~ ( )
535 ~ TION _ . - SE ROAD AL PIC TY 2. GRAY WALLS 910-572-3661 IS CONTACT WITH TOWN OF DEVICES. o ~ 535 ( ) TROY. 3. REQUEST INSPECTION FOR PERIMETER INSTALLED ~
A t~~p ' ~O• EROSION CONTROL DEVICES. ~
NO SCALE - v Rio 4 3. CONCRETE OR CORRUGATED ALUMINUM END SECTIONS SHALL 4. CLEAR AND GRUB SITE.
48" RCP 48" CP BE PLACED AT BOTH ENDS OF 48" CULVERT. 5. INSTALL REMAINDER OF EROSION CONTROL DEVICES. CP
INV.=536.3 INV. 533.0 6. REMOVE EXISTING 48 CMP. 533.0 7. GRADE SITE LAND DISTURBING PROCEDURES .
530 530 4. WETLANDS IMPACT (DETERMINATION BY U.S. CORPS OF ( )
PUMPING STATION 0+00 1+00 ENGINEERS) IS 35 FEET IN WIDTH (17.5 FEET ON BOTH 8. INSTALL 48" RCP, END SECTIONS, AND TURF +00
LINE BEARING DISTANCE SIDES OF CENTERLINE OF CULVERT) FOR THE ENTIRE LENGTH REINFORCEMENT. 9. MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL DEVICES, A MINIMUM a
L1 S 43'16'15" E 87.60 FT OF THE NEW CULVERT. OF WEEKLY AND AFTER EVERY RAIN. ~
' 60.00 FT CTI O N W A SE 43 45 RO D L2 S 46 E B 10. SEED AND VEGETATE STREAM CHANNEL WHERE TURF " O
L3 N 43'16'15" W 13.33 FT REINFORCEMENT IS INSTALLED. J N
L4 N 43'16'15" W 24.22 FT ER AT CUL 11. LAND DISTURBING PROCEDURES COMPLETED AND r N
L5 N 43'16'15" W 50.05 FT `G ABC r Set: 0 / ~ ~ ~ ,:Y / / " „ , . u rr / f H 1=50 V1=5 SITE STABILIZED. W Q
L6 N 46 43 45 E 21.20 FT , Q Q 0 / ,,r ~ 3/4„ ~rerr' , / D ~V 6~ / / T ~ ~ r 12. REMOVE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES. U Z 13. REQUEST FINAL INSPECTION FOR EROSION CONTROL Z Q -
L7 N 46'43 45 E 38.80 F l Rebar / / Q J h~ l / 6 ~ r1 JJO ACCEPTANCE. W ~ O t0
SEWER LINE DATA ~a ,t ~ ~ r f ~ LINE BEARING DISTANCE ~ v?v / ~ _ ~O
p7 / / 0 ~ L` t` ? L8 N 62'40'33" W 60.61 FT 4 ~rj6 o Q1 ~ ~ / S ~ / , r wQ~ UU)
> „ 196.86 FT ~ , 10 1` ~ / P~G~. / L9 S 81 57 43 W t 4 ~ ~`L ~o, / . / Z ~ 00
S 89'04'55 W 196.82 FT ~ ~ a. L10 b ~ I t ~ / ~ r W20
L11 N 71'42'40" W 174.47 FT 1 I r 6U ; . ,r i NTROL GEN A NOTES EROSI CO ~o
L12 N 8812 46 W 322.23 FT ~ ~ 1 I / / 0 , f ~ ~ . pzM U ~
L13 N 44'55 58" E 103.18 FT 1 ~ I r` / o ; V „ Fi EXCELSIOR MATTING r DEED B K 554 / o. ,~0
L14 N 02'13 20 W 141.95 FT , I I ~ _ ~ , 2 IN DITCH TYP. ~ o / / . IN ( ) ~ 1 PA -6.41 s'` ALL PERMANENT MEASURES SHALL BE 1. THE TOWN SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS TO AVOID THE SILTING OF STREAMS, r- O SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION LAKES OR OTHER WATER SOURCES DUE TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. Z O ~
L15 N 02'34 33 W 132.96 FT ~ I ~ / / ;r ; 1 _ 1- r ' ~O
L16 N 52'10'57" E 119.06 FT ; ~ ~ ~ j j ~ / ; .l,f ~5 SCHEDULE. SEEDING OF THE SITE (WITH :SITE WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE STREAM CHANNEL) SHALL BE BASED W m (
1 , ~ I ~ ON THE SEEDING SCHEDULE. TURF REINf F REINFORCEMENT MATTING SHALL BE PLACED IN THE STREAM 2. EFFECTIVE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INITIATED PRIOR TO THE COM- W . TUR MENCEMENT OF CLEARING GRADING EXCAVATING OR OTHER OPERATIONS THAT WILL =
New Road Easement ~ ~ ; _ I / CHANNEL IMMEDIATELY UPSTRAM & DOWP t ; / RAM & DOWNSTREAM OF THE CULVERT END SECTIONS FOR THE FULL J cn DISTURB THE NATURAL PROTECTION. THE EROSION CONTROL DETAILS SHOWN HEREIN . Q
I EXTENT OF CHANNEL DISTURBANCE. THE Z ~ ~f / p~ . tBANCE. THE EXISTING CHANNEL SHALL BE WIDENED TO THE DIMENSIONS ARE FOR REFERENCE. THE DETERMINATION OF WHICH DETAIL IS APPLICABLE AS THE
' o . I 1 / ~ INDICATED, AND STABILIZED USING EROSIi LINE BEARING DISTANCE I 1 / USING EROSION CONTROL TURF REINFORCEMENT. SLOPE STABILIZATION WORK PROGRESSES SHALL BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER. RrN aI~FRICaN c;REEN 0350 THREE DIMENSIONAL PERMANENT UV
~ ~ ~ ~ WOODS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY NORTH AMERICA „ / L17 N 12 59 06 W 254.55 FT ~ i I
STABILIZED POLYPROPYLENE NET WITH FI /0> _ NET WITH FIBER MATT NG OR EQUAL. THE CHANNEL SLOPES AND BOTTOM 3. ALL TRENCHES SHALL BE STABILIZED AS SOON AS IS PRACTICAL TO MINIMIZE EROSION.
~ / _ - _ SHALL BE PREPARED, AND THE EROSION _ L18 N 77°00'54" E 45.00 FT ~ / HE EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE CHANNEL WHEN WORK IS TO CEASE FOR OVERNIGHT OR LONGER, THE OPEN TRENCHES SHALL T BE LEFT SO AS TO PREVENT WATER IN THE TRENCH DUE TO RAIN OR OTHER CAUSES
/ 'f: _ BOTTOM AND SLOPE IN STRICT ACCORDAI „ ' \To wn of Troy j f , 5ro0 , ICY ACCORDANCE WITH THE MATERIAL MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS, N ANNELED INTO A CREEK LAKE ROAD ITCH ETC. UPON START UP a FROM BEI G CH SIDED ~
L19 S 12'59'06 E 204.14 FT NORTH I ~ Q ,,:4 l.... WITH THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS OR Troy ~usrness Center , (CATIONS OR STIPULATIONS: OF WORK AGAIN, ALL WATER IN THE TRENCH SHALL BE PUMPED INTO A STONE FILTER
'Deed Bodk 369 Pa e 501 - _ o ~ 15" INV. 550.00`-- CAROLINA , 9 , ~ TRENCH AS DETAILED HEREIN. m
L20 S 12°59'D6" E 58.97 FT lat Cabrnet Slide 165-A ~ o _ THE EROSION CONTROL NET SHALL BE F SHALL BE ANCHORED WITH "U" SHAPED 9-GAUGE WIRE
GRID NORTH o =,Z n, - STAPLES WITH A MINIMUM TOP WIDTH OF INCH AND LENGTH OF EIGHT INCHES. 4. THE TOWN SHALL AVOID THE PLACEMENT OF ANY MATERIAL OVER ANY EROSION OP WIDTH OF ONE CONTROL DEVICE WHILE IT IS IN USE. k'
i I L21 S 62°4312 E 73.56 FT NAD 83 • - _ ~ , STAPLE PATTERN E (3.8 STAPLES/ D.) ~ G , TAPLES/YD.) SHALL BE EMPLOYED. AN ADDITIONAL TWO o
A TYPICAL ROAD • t ~ ~ / ROWS OF STAPLES APPROXIMATELY FOUR ~ ~ ~ ~ MAYFLY FOUR INCHES (ROWS AND STAPLES) APART IN A 5. THE TOWN SHALL INSPECT ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AT THE END OF
L22 N 46 43 45 E 106.96 FT _ ~J - s 1 SECTION CLEARIN ' ~ ` I ` , o ~ STAGGERED PATTERN SHALL BE INSTALLE 2 ~ti / ti BE INSTALLED FOR A DISTANCE OF TEN FEET IMMEDIATELY EACH WORK DAY, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN A GOOD STATE OF REPAIR, UNTIL THE USE
' ! - DOWNSTREAM OF THE CULVERT END SEC L23 S 43'16'15" E 45.00 FT , , t , r - `O1 / - =RT END SECTION. OF THE DEVICES ARE NO LONGER WARRANTED. AT THIS TIME THE DEVICES SHALL BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF SO AS TO CAUSE NO STREAM SILTATION.
~ o r
; N ~ LIME OR PELLETIZED FERTILIZER SHALL I L24 S 46°43'45" W 100.00 FT r ~ , ~ ~ IZER SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO ENTER THE STREAM BANKS. A 6. EXCELSIOR MATTING SHAlL BE PLACED ON THE 2:1 SLOPES FROM THE TOP OF THE Z
• '~y< / WO)~ LIQUID FERTILIZER SHALL BE USED (OR 5 ~ I ,2, ~ _ USED (OR ALTERNATIVELY, THE FERTILIZER MAY BE DISSOLVED IN CULVERT TO THE ACCESS ROAD SHOULDER. PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ~
i ~ ; ~ i - A HYDROSEEDER PRIOR TO APPLICATION) ONLY TO THE SLOPES OF THE SHALL BE PLACED IN STREAM CHANNEL AS INDICATED AND REQUIRED TO SUPPORT ~ APPLICATION) AND APPLIED
- Sta ~ ~ ~ , CHANNEL MORE THAN TWO FEET ABOVE . c~. 0 ~ 1 w FEET ABOVE THE BOTTOM OF THE CHANNEL. VEGETATION. a
E TEMPORARY SEflIMENT PT + S ~ n N 6243 2 on ° ~ 67.28 FT
- 2 TRAP TYP. OF 3 t ) ' eb, " INSTALLATION OF THE EROSION CONTROL ON CONTROL TURF REINFORCEMENT SHALL BEGIN AT THE TOP OF v
Easement No. 1 R150.00 r Found 6 THE CHANNEL BY ANCHORING THE MATEI 0.44 Acre t - ± .SdPoplar Tree 8° OR 10°. SEWE IG THE MATERIAL IN A 12-INCH DEEP BY 6-INCH WIDE TRENCH, ~
9~--' P ~ - t ~ APPROXIMATE L BACKFILLED AND COMPACTED IMMEDIATEL IMMEDIATELY AFTER INSTALLATION. EACH ROLL SHALL BE m 0
68 L.F. 48 P q ~ ~ ~ ~ OVERLAPPED AT LEAST 6-INCHES. JCHES.
2-48" FLARED END SECTIO - ~ ~ 'maw i u o _ ~ 4.07 ~ - ~ w... - - - `~W' ~
- - - - - ~ ' ~ ~ ~ IF ANY STAPLES BECOME LOOSENED OR )OSENED OR RAISED, OR IF ANY MATTING BECOMES LOOSE, TORN, OR
_ OP MANHOLE RIM _ ~ ~ ~ 6 _ - - - ~ , - CHAIN LINK FE _ _ _ _ _ _ - ~ ~ UNDERMINED, REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE .L BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. ~
-544.75• - ~ ~ ~
- - ' - - ~ W 4 "RCP END NOT NEW 48 INV. ~ ~ NE 8 RYEGRASS LOLIUM MULTIFLORUM SHALI ACCESSIB ( ) DRUM) SHALL BE SOWN AT THE RATE OF APPROXIMATELY 2 POUNDS FOR
_ ELEV. 536.30 INV. 533.00 - - ' EVERY 1,000 SQ. f7. OF EROSION CONT / ~ ~ s ~OSION CONTROL TURF REINFORCEMENT. IN NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL ~
~ ~ FESCUE OR ANY OTHER SEED SPECIES I - ~ ~ .D SPECIES BE ALLOWED TO ENTER THE CHANNEL. TOWN SHALL PLANT a ~
~ P • ~ ' SPRIGS OF TAG ELDER ALNUS RUGOSA \ , ( JUS RUGOSA OR ALNUS SERRULATA) OR BLACK WILLOW (SALIX NIGRA) AT ~ C
B CULVERT INLET ' ti EXIST. 48 CM ~ , ~ ~ti THE RATE OF APPROXIMATELY ONE PLAN _Y ONE PLANT FOR EVERY 10 SQ. FT. ON THE CHANNEL SLOPES. ~
2 PR ECTION (TYP.) , f .DOT STON D TO BE REMOVED D 0
• ' SILT SCREEN 2 B ROAD TION r OTHER VEGETATIVE SPECIES MAY BE USE ~ ~ MAY BE USED WITH PRIOR APPROVAL OF DWQ. W
AT CULVERT ~ ~ / y ~ ~ Found: 7/8" iron Rebar•s V W
1 ~,~r, / i ~ ~ / at three corners of the Vs
_ - T5T- ~ / Pum in Station Lot ~ ~ f+ ~ D i I L
~ ~ , I • i ~ a ao
1 I ~ , ~ ~ I , ! I ~ ~ ~ ' ~ O Z
S ~ i / / ~ ~ EXIST. GRAVEL i ~ i ~ W
~`ti ' o / ~ DRIVEWAY ~ - 540 k ~ i r, i ~ ~ _ 560; I H ~ ~ !560 ~ ~
F~- ~ ~ ' Set: 3/4 Iron Rebar -,w~ ' - F 1 3 / i C N~ ~ Curve ength = 15 .00 I
~ ' North - 578,357.66 FT u g , ~ I _ ,1 - ~ I ~ ( =11.26 ~ ' ( ' 7 ~ ~ i ~ ~
_ , East = 1,722,477.60 FT' Y - ~I ~ o EXIST. 15 CPP ~ ~ ~ p = 2.50 W W
f I ,~h ~ ' ~ I TO BE REMOVE s ~urve Length f= 100.00 CLEARING a~ , I I K = 2.70 :h 1 oo.ao ~ I H V V i ~ /
, r 3 0 • TEMPORARY DIVERSION C _ _ _ - ~ 1 555I E _ X0.55 2.7o I I ! Z 1555 ~ V X0.55
~ ; I DITCH TYP. 2 ( ) I W~ M ~ I Q
~ i ~ ~ I 1 i Set;.- ~ ~ I I M ~D I V ~ ~ I
. _ _ 7/8 Iron ~ 1 r .2 ~ ode., , :Rebar ~ i p 2.00 ~ N j N ~ ~ o ~ + / 0
+ M ~ N ~ N
~ 4 _ _ ~ ~ v~j U I _ - 5~0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ I o ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ . ~ . In ~ W c~ ao ~ ~ III r ~ ~ 550
\ ~ ~ I I ~ - 550; ~ o ~ ~ ~ 0 co ~ 1 /lam J I J ~ Ease~r+,ent No. 2 cv b 0 _ ! Z C Q o
. ook 491 Pa In p ~ \ ~ I 0.19 Acre t o ~ ~ a> a ~ Gt 0 p ~ In ~ ~ ~ I H ~ E ~ ~ , y
Drave ~ v ~ + , ~ ~ I I ~ I II II p ~ ~ ' A 09 ~ II II II II j ( ~ ~
~ , ~,t ~ ~ \ i I ~ TEMP. CONSTRUCTION A I Q > ~ ~ a~ ~ m o a > > ~
~ ~ i, II II ~ o~ ~ ~w w ~ O ~ ~ I i545 PROJECT NUMBER
h I ENTRANCE (TYP.) 2 cn w y v . I 545 _ Q > ~ - I - ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ 06059 06
~ h`~ ,.I j 1 ~ i ~ I ~ i
~ \ ~ { > > ~ ~ I DESIGNED BY u 11 ~ I » \ I I I
~ \ I E Uwh ~ 1 , - Q , ~ I LWP ~ I i ~ H J ( j ,
~ ~ _ Deed ~ / ~ \ I i I cn w ~
\ 540 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _.i. I ~ ( i X540 DRAWN BY ~ F F ~ ~ MRS
» \ ~ ~ ~ I / i ~
~ ~ ~ \ i ~ / ~ \ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ i CHECKED BY / ' I
~ ~ i ~ ~ r I c I ~ LWP
CiiRUF DATA ' ~ ~ i i I ~ /
Y~i• ~J~I Radius = 60296 FT I \
Q / Arc 50.01 FT \ 535 - 1 NEW 48" RCP- INV. (L 534.93 i c535 SCALE AS NOTED
Q Chord Information I
N 73'08'44" W 50.00 FT % DATE O I
~a \ L iLo In QI ~ q o o 00) APRIL 2006
00 % Lo 12 - + n
C~l W \ \ \ 530) o LO 44. +n + Ln +n + i Ln to to i to -4- N 530 O In u7 u7 N, 0 OF
\ 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 P:06059_06 Ow s .REVSATE-l.dw 1:1

GR ADI G A D 0 I L D
3' 4" THICK 3' BERM ••••,~a uuu,,,~~ IN CHANNELS, ROLL OUT STRIPS OF MATTING PARR ~J~'•. ~
_ _ FLOOD STORAGE ZONE #57 STONE FINISH LLEL TO ~ GRADE THE DIRECTION OF FLOW AND OVER THE PROTECTIVE `~r''~ '••~6'.
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EXISTING TREE LINE /EXIT, MULCH ; 0 , ~ , ~ :a
RIP-RAP CHANNEL SEDIMENT STORAGE ZONE Q:~
in MATTING NORTH ; ;W o 3 AMERICAN GREEN 'ss
EXISTING FENCES r ~ FLOW MODEL C-125 •.,d?
EXCELSIOR MATTING in s, .oH P, OR EQUAL
INVERT PIPE
1' AINAGE COURSE 8' 8' 5' MIN.
TST-3 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP (TST)
SECT v., EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR SECTION A-A
X78 r
PROPOSED GRADE CONTOUR RIP-RAP APRON OUTLET PROTECTION RRA ~W ;o F
( ) , , ~
CULVERT (C) INVERT PIPE
CULVERT INLET PROTECTION CIP A ` _ t A INSTALL STAPLES EVERY FOUR FEET IN
CONSTRUCTION/CLEARING LIMITS ~ ~ h Y' ~ ~ FLOW LINE, ALTERNATING EVERY TWO
FEET ON EITHER SIDE. INSTALL STAPLES
STANDARD DOT ROCK SILT SCREEN, - ' ~ ~ EVERY FOUR FEET ALONG TOP EDGE S
STONE CHECK DAM CENTER LINE a
FLOW ~ w ~
STAPLE O J N
TBM TEMPORARY BENCH MARK R PROPERTY LINE (R) (nP) ~ N
1 CLASS "B" w
- ~ a 18 OVERLAP (TYP) U RIP-RAP Z
~-TDD f- TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH TDD Z Q- JJO
( ) SECTION NUMBER OR DETAIL LETTER W ao~ ~o
wQ~' 1 UU)
ABC ~ ~
NOTE: DIMENSIONS ARE MINIMUM UNLESS SEDIMENT FENCE 123 OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER. Z w rn 2~
SHEET NUMBER (WHERE SECTION/DETAIL APPEARS JOIN STRIPS BY ANCHORING ~
OR WHERE SECTION/DETAIL WAS TAKEN FROM) P TSD-2 PLAN ~ o ~ AND OVERLAPPING AS SHOWN ~
TEMPORARY SLOPE DRAIN (TSD) . UZM
CUL V ERT IN LET PR OTE ANC ~ ~ ~ HOR MATTING IN 0... r P ROT ECTI ON o
B 6 TRENCH (TYP} Z ~ ~O
NO SCALE W m
- GRADING & EROSION CONTROL GENERAL NOTES• w
L I A J I F ~ ~
1. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEEDING SHALL BE NO SCALE Q
COMPLETED WITHIN 30 DAYS FOLLOWING LAND DISTURBANCE. SEE EROSION CONTROL DETAIL
SHEET FOR SEEDING REQUIREMENTS AND
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE.
0
2. SEE EROSION CONTROL DETAIL SHEET FOR a
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP AND CULVERT
OUTLET STABILIZATION SIZING. } m
3. EXCELSIOR MATTING SHALL BE PLACED IN
DITCHES AND OTHER AREAS THAT EXHIBIT
MULCH DISPLACEMENT FROM VELOCITY SCOUR. 12" THICK LAYER OF ~
#57 WASHED STONE ~ 5.0' 2:1 SLOPE
MIN. 1:1 SIDE SLOPE (TYP)
6'-0»
2:1 SLOPE , 5.0 MAX. z
2' MIN. CLASS B
LEVEL i; 1800 RIP-RAP ° CU FT/ACRE -
COMPACTED SOIL CROWN FROM DITCH NATURAL a
EXCAVATION GROUND BASE LENGTH FI - LTER FABRIC ~
PLACE ON BERM (
1.5 MIN. LOWER SIDE 12" THICK LAYER OF ' MIN. ~ SECTION A-A ~
OF DITCH) X57 WASHED STONE W
21" MIN. ~
~ DI - 2:1 SLOPE ,I 2:1 SIDE SLOPE MAX.
FLO OR FLATTER W 2'1 DAM
HEIGHT WEIR a
~ : 1.' 'y
5 % . 6.0' . ,
SECTION A-A ~N A-A n EMERGENCY BY-PAS
NOTE: THE DIVERTED RUNOFF SHOULD BE RELEASED THROUGH A CLASS B RIP-RAP ~ b S ~ DEPTH \ 6 BELOW TOP OF TRAP
STABLIZED OUTLET, SLOPE DRAIN, OR SEDIMENT TRAPPING MEASURE. aW
= 3 o~ ~
~ ~o TEMP o ORARY 0 1:1 SIDE ~ 1:1 SIDE SLOPE TYP 0 ~ FlLTER 3.0' ( ) SLOPE `
PER MA NE NT DI V 10 RS N D ITC H C ~ FABRIC MIN. MAX. y Q W
NO SCALE TOP OF J0 A Q ~~ti BANK A NAT N URAL GROUND F
BASE WIDTH W W
yr _ ~ p
SECTION B B V
ao J
B Z B B W Q
6" T ' HICK MIN. OF ~ • ~ } ~
S 2-3" COARSE STONE ~ t } E I G SC E U E ~ t LL - ~ N ~ r H
C ~ Z
X ~ ~ SEEDING MIXTURE: ~
SPECIES RATE LB. ACRE ~ " A W ~ ~ A
TALL FESCUE 100 _4 HV TOP OF V
KOREAN LESPEDEZA 40 ~`ti r BANK Z W~ Z
BERMUDA (HULLED) 15 NOTE: NOTES: BASE OF DITCH V m
BETWEEN MAY 1 AND AUG. 20, ADD 10 LBS./ACRE GERMAN A
MILLET. BETWEEN AUG. 1 A STABILJZED PAD OF CRUSHED STONE SHALL BE LOCATED WHERE TRAFFIC WILL -iA ~ 0 V~
15 AND MAY 1, ADD 40 LBS./ACRE BE ENTERING OR P N LEAVING A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO OR FR TOP OM APUBLIC STREET. OF RYE (GRAIN). BETWEEN SEPT. 1 AND OCT. 25 OVERSEED WITH IF N N O>I TOP OF W f+
THIS LOCATION IS SUBJECT TO SEEPAGE OR HIGH WATER TABLE STABILIZE BANK 10 LBS./ACRE OF KOBE LESPEDEZA. FOUNDATION WITH GEOTEXTIL BANK Z C
E FABRIC. ` 'o W
SEEDING DATES: 2 THIS ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT N B ~
AUGUST 20 -OCTOBER 25 TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS OR EXISTING IBAP PLAN m
FEBRUARY 1 -MAY 1 PAVEMENT. THIS MAY RE UIRE PER Q IODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE DAM HEIGHT PROJECT NUMBER
AS CONDITIONS DEMAND AND REPAIR AND OR CLEANOUT OF ANY • x= SOIL AMENDMENTS: / MEASURES 3.0' MAX. - 1.5' MIN.
USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. ~ EXISTING APPLY AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE AT 2-3 TONS/ACRE 06059-06 ~ ~ (SEE NOTE BELOW) SEDIMENT TRAP SCHEDULE
FERTILIZER - 1,000 LBS./ACRE - 10-10-10 3 ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED DROPPED W GRADE
ASHED OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC STREETS SUPERPHOSPHATE - 500 LBS./ACRE - 207 ANALYSIS MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. BASE OF DISTURBED REQUIRED TRAP DESIGNED BY TRAP NO. BASE BASE BASE OF DITCH AREA (ACRE) VOLUME CU. FT. LENGTH FT. DEPTH (FT.) WEIR (FT.) LWP
MULCH - 2 TONS ACRE -SMALL GRAIN / STRAW ~ ) ( ) WIDTH FT. ( )
4 WHEN NECESSARY WHEELS MUST BE C ECTION B-B ANCHOR -ASPHALT EMULSION AT 300 GAL./ACRE ~ LEANED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO -B TST-1 0.2 360 30 1 g DRAYVN BY 2.0 4.0
ENTRING A PUBLIC STREET. WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED, IT SHALL BE DONE TST-2 0.2 36 MRS
MULCH: ON AN EREA STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE WHICH DRAINS INTO AN 0 30 16 2.0 4.0 TST-3 0,3 540 30 16 CHECKED BY
APPLY 4,000 TO 5,000 LB ACRE GRAIN STRAW OR EQUIVALENT COVER. APPROVED SEDIMENT BASIN. / 3.0 4.0
nnirunR ru Rv rnwi~ir wiTU ncnuei T NOTE: MAXIMUM HEIGHT nF ~A~I SHAI I RF nl~ ~HAII RF t\In ~~nR~ Tueni LWP
min n~r"nnLI, rrvviiv~ vm ivtiiiroU. ONE FOOT ABOVE NORMAL FLOW LEVEL. ....w vn~ i i inn FLOW LEVEL. WIDTH OF SCALE
MAINTENANCE: TEMPORARY AV ;S THAN WIDTH OF DITCH.
CONSTRUCTION OF DAM SHALL BE NO LESS THAN WIDT ENTRANCE/EXIT REFERTILIZE IN THE SECOND YEAR UNLESS GROWTH IS FULLY A AS NOTED
ADEQUATE. MAY BE MOWED ONCE OR TW NO SCALE ICE A YEAR. RESEED, DATE
DOT STONE SILT STANDARD FERTILIZE AND MULCH DAMAGED AREAS IMMEDIATELY. J SILT SCREEN D TEMPORARY
NO SCALE SEDIMENT APRIL P E 2006
NO SCALE
OF 2 2 P: 006059-06 Dw s REVSITE-ldw 1:1
1 i

ae a o e e
~i
I::
200 0 200 o
Scale is in Feet
1 200'
I' i i - d I
II II J r- rtrtnn Vl~~ I -
I
II ~ Area N. of Industrial Dr. ROW to the I' ~
northern ROW line of the gravity sewer - - ~ I
=159390 sf or 3.66 Acres i' ~ ~
Dedicated by Town of Troy to remain as is. i~ ~ 1
' '1
Uwharrie Qiatam Milworlu Town of Troy (1) K. A ` 10.08 aces 3.21 K. R. Drenth 3.21 ones
Driveway to Drenth d other property ~ Asaume 25x enperwous 35x 35X Impervfaus j omas a Fields Office SWp i' ~
on the N side of ravit sewer line. 9 y 1 1.92 aces 6X Impervious ~
Driveway = 24'x 377' = 9048 sf or .21 acres impervious ' i ~ ~ Driveway = .54 Acres Total ROW Y / b
; ; M ~
NORTH ~ / j ~
CAROLINA ~ - - 1 - ¦ ~ i
Industrial Drive GRID NORTH I 1 - ~ - - / I ~ Town of Troy - - • ~ ~e
25 x1652 = 41 , 300 sf or . 95 Acres that are impervious. 1 uedl~+~ Row j I I 3.68 Aces r
I ndustr i a I Drive has 2.28 Acres of ROW Town of Troy (2) I 267 aaee I 'I ' of i. ~ Y
1 Aeeume 25x inpervlous ~ : , I .r ii,~ i
1i 1 I Uwherrb Bu9dero i 7.58 acres ~ o i i~
2 . ( ' I I aer-eS o I I r I j 11X Impervious ,~1 i rj j, tio°e ~
''1, ~ ~ ~ i
I ~~e i ~i
Elite Foods: / \c~e°°o~o i' v i i i
~ l Bld .-288'x177` = 40,356 sf / ~ 9 I ~ ~e i. ~~o~
- - Concrete pad - 25 x35 - 875 sf I 6 e ~e~ ,
Enc I osed b I dg = 26'x27' = 702 sf uerged hto °^e tract / Liide Seheds ~ r _ ~ ' _ , 18.34 eeroe / \ ~ l~ e~ ~ A i
Pads for ch I I I er - 27 x 60 - 1620 sf ~ _ _ \ I / \ ~ ,
Pads for chiller 39 x22 858 sf i i, i~
Load i n dock = 117' x83' = 9711 sf ~ I / a~~e 9 Or i ve = 22'x120' = 2640 sf ~ I / SALlmpenias i i i' i
~ ~ \ - - Sidewalk - 64 x6 - 384 sf TOTAL ACTUAL & ASSUMED IMPERVIOUS ACRES ~ I / ; i is ~
Parking area = 208'x111' = 23,088 sf ~ I / i i l
- - 1 0 sf Sidewalk - 5 x30 - 5 Driveway to Drenth - .21 A I / "
Holding Lagoon = 4000 sf Industrial Drive - 2.28 A / i/~
DAF treatment facility = 2000 sf Elite Foods - 4.22 A / Parking area = 5'x65' = 325 sf _ i
K.R. Drenth 1.14 A / _ / / Driveway = 28 x455 - 12740 sf wharrie Custom Mill - A \ - - U works .38 I /
Parking area - 56 x143 - 8008 sf ~ Uwharrie Builders - .86 A ~ / ~ /
Parkin area = (semi trian le) 310 x310 x .667 = 64,002 sf _ I ~ / 9 - ~ ~ 9 Wright d Fields .51 A / TanoPTrgl31
Driveway - 50 x 310 = 15500 sf _ I +.ze aria , - S I ng I e Owner ( a I I ow ) 2.00 A / aeaune z5x leperviaue ~ i i
rive ent. = 62 x 46 - 2852 sf _ I D Industiral Park (1) (allow) 2.50 A / TOTAL IMPERVIOUS: = 183,811 sf or 4.22 Acres Industiral Park (2) (allow) - .67 A I ' Uwharrie Builders
PERCENT IMPERVIOUS = 56% - 1 Bldg. = 51`x101' = 5151 sf
Industiral Park (3) (allow) 1.09 A 1 ~ ~ Gravel storage area = 215'x100' = 21500 sf
/ ~ ' TOTAL IMPERVIOUS - 15.86 A 1 ~ Gravel drive = 22'x111' = 2442 sf
/ ; 1 \ ; _ / / , Paved parking ~ sidewalk = 55'x75' = 4125 sf
TOTAL ACRES IN PARK = 56 A I / / Paved drive = 34'x67' = 2278 sf TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 35496 sf or .81 Acres + .05 Acres = .86 Acres
I / i ~ ~ i / - PERCENT IMPERVIOUS = 11%
TOTAL PERCENT OF INDUSTIAL PARK ~ / THAT IS IMPERVIOUS = 15.86/56 = 28%
K R Drenth Truck Garage / ,
- = 4000 sf Bldg - 80 x50 Y PROP TH V THAT ~ / '
Concrete ad = 10'x50' = 500 sf ONL 2 ERTIES OUT OF E FI E ~ , p ~ ~ HAVE BUILT OUT ARE ABOVE 30x IMPERVIOUS. I / Gravel arkin ~ drive area = 130 x350 = 45,500 sf P 9 - I / ' Pump station
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS: - 50,000 sf or 1.14 Acres _ Dr i vewa = 15'x138' ~ 2070 sf t ~ Y„ Y ~
ONE OF THE 3 REMAINING 1 IS AT 26% IMPERVIOUS & 1 ` / ~~IF~ PERCENT IMPERVIOUS = 35% PS Concrete = 50 sf ~ TOTAL: 2120 sf or 05 Acres
THE OTHER 2 ARE AT 11% AND 13%. l ~ , / - Add this area to Uwharrie Builders area JUL j
I i~ , THIS SUMMARY DOES NOT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT LOW / ~ ~ ~ ' I ~ 1006
AN THAT HAV N LA SIFI A W TLANDS / ~ 1 L DS E BEE C S ED S E / ~~~~WAT~~~,
Uwharrie Custom Millworks I ~ ON THE UWHARRIE BUILDERS SITE. THERE IS A LOT OF / / , 1 6iv6„ ~ is ri B(Zq
Bld = 85'x80' = 6800 sf I / 9 ~ LAND THERE THAT IS UNUSEABLE. / / - - 1
Sidewalk - 90 x4 - 360 sf ~ _ _ / / ~ ~ , Gravel parking - 41 x60 - 2460 sf USING 25y. FOR THE UNSOLD SITES IS VERY CONSERVATII~E , Wright ~ Fields Office Strip
. / 1 - ~ ~ - / ~ Gravel driveway - 30 x173 - 5190 sf BASED ON THE OVERALL IMPERVIOUS PERCENTAGE OF THEI ~ Bldg = 112'x35' = 3920 sf Garage = 25'x25' = 625 sf
Concrete ad = 25x25 = 625 sf / ~ ' p BUILT OUT SITES. I / ~ 1 Concrete slabs = 100 sf
_ - f / ~ Concrete pads 5x12 - 60 s I / / ~ ' Gravel parking = 53'x71' = 3763 sf
Gravel drive = 20`x71' = 1420 sf I ; , TOTAL IMPERVIOUS: 16,915 sf or .38 Acres / / ~ ~ Gravel parking = 80'x77` = 6160 sf
I / ' PERCENT IMPERVIOUS - 13% / ; Gravel drive = 42'x20' = 840 sf
/ , Asphalt parking = 49'x112' = 5488 sf Sidewalk = 7'x 85' = 595 sf
1 / , Asphalt drive = 34'x16' = 544 sf
I / ' TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 22,035 sf or .51 Acres
I / ' PERCENT IMPERVIOUS = 26x
I / ' I / ,
j / , - (~C
I / ,
/ - I _ ~a.~,res r._
/ ' I , e
/ ~ I - m
/ ' I
/ I /
1 / iii ti,*.,.
I /
I NORTH CAROLINA / ; _ _.a.u ~b
MONTGOMERY COUNTY I /
N0. 1 REV ION DATE BY APP'D nnnr.rrwin r.in
i, CARP SCALE: NOT TO SCALE 0?11410~ unhwirvu vu: ESSIo~fy GATE: 11/19/95 FTOWN OF TROY
TOWN OF TROY ENGINEER GINEEKING DEPT. o of q DRAWN BY: EGw
=ae SEAL ~ CHECKED BY: GWC NC-1 0 8 POOLE RD WATER EXT.
315 NORTH MAIN STRE IN STREET r~ 8467 APPROVED BY: EGW 4t
TROY N.C. 27371 SHT. SHTs. 27371 /NEEQ PROJECT NO. N ORAV WATER MA ~ N L ~/OUT of
I f~ L ~vst~ . Co " ~
TroylnAustwetPlat.a9n 7/12/2006 3:06:40 PM
Ov J)Jtt
6t -z

l -
iN

iN
THE TOWN OF TROY WILL COVENANT WITH THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
TO MAINTAIN IN ITS NATURAL STATE, ANY AND ALL DELINEATED WETLANDS
(3.185 ACRES) AS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING. TROY FURTHER PLEDGES TO RETAIN a 0 e ae PERPETUAL OWNERSHIP OF SAID WETLANDS WITH NO REMEDY AVAILABLE THAT e
WOULD ALLOW THE TOWN OF TROY TO SELL THESE HERETO DESCRIBED WETLAND
AREAS. THE TOWN OF TROY FURTHER PLEDGES TO PROVIDE THE STATE WITH A MAP
AS SUPPLIED BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR THAT DELINEATES THIS AREA
WITH DEED CALLS AND A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SAY AREA WITHIN 60 DAYS OF ISSUANCE
OF A 401 PERMIT.
200 0 200 X00
Scale is in Feet
1 200'
i
I~ I~
II II ~ . , ~ ~
, ~
II II i
I, I,
Area N. of Industrial Dr. ROW to the I , ,
northern ROW line of the gravity sewer =159390 sf or 3.66 Acres 1 Property Lfne for Wetland set-aside to be ~
Dedicated by Town of Troy to rema i n as i s. omed perpetually by the Tom of Troy.
' ~ K. R. Drenth
Uwhan-ie Custam Mplwarke ~ Tom of Troy (1 ) ll ` 10.08 acres ~ ~ 3.0 Aaee ~ ~ , Assure 25x inpervlaus 3.21 acres /i r 35X Impervious Thomos J. Fidde Office Strip y/
Driveway to Drenth ~ other property I 13X Impervious ;1 1.92 case j '1 26X Impervbua /
on the N s I de of gravity sewer I l ne. ~ P rty Line far Wetland setrosi eta be I perpetually by the Town of roy. ~4 ' 1`• /
Drivewa = 24'x 377' = 9048 sf or .21 acres impervious II Y I~ I. 1 ~ 1 ~ ti 0
Driveway = .54 Acres Total ROW i \ ' a I 1 N /
I NORTH ~ ~ ~ i j ,
- CAROLINA ~ _ ' , _ Gap,,
GRID NORTH I ~ 1 _ _ , G °ie
Industrial Drive - I l~ ~ I I Tom of Troy ,r - ~ I ~ eob~ ~ ,
25'x1652' = 41 , 300 sf or . 95 Acres that are impervious. it Dedicated Wetlands Aroa I of Tra 2 . 8 Acres of ROW 1. Ta""' yc ~ I 3.66 Aces I ndustr l a l Dr I ve has 2 2 2.s~ saes ` . e w/ of j
I Assume 25X impardaus I ~ ,i;,' I ~ I , '
1 (r' Uwharrie BuBdare y 1.58 cave ot~' j ,d
~ ~ j II 2 • aef`@S Q r ~ Ili l I 11X Impervious ,q ~ ~ , I d'
, / ~ I i i i ! / I ~ O~d1 ! i ti
V I / \ fi~e~ i \caobeo~
' I / I ~ ~ e ~ i /
1 Elite Foods: / ~~o~ ~0~ _i ~ Fe
Bld .-288'x177' = 40,356 sf I 9 0 / / H
- 5' = 875 sf ~ ~ I ~ Concrete pad - 25 x3 „ta / _ ~ ~ _ f ~ \ Enc I osed b I dg - 26 x27 - 702 s 1 ~e°1e / /
P \ I assume 25% impervbw / ads for ch i I I er = 27' x 60' = 1620 sf ~
_ ' ' = f \ EI'de Faoda Pads for chiller 39 x22 858 s I / ~ ~ \ ~ 7.43 acres i// '
Loading dock = 117 X83 = 9711 Sf \ I / 56X Impxviaue ~ / /
Drive = 22 `x120' = 2640 sf \ / - - UMED IMPERVIOUS ACRES ~ I j' / /
Sidewalk - 64 x6 - 384 sf TOTAL ACTUAL d ASS \ / - = 3,088 sf I i /
Parking area - 208 x111 2 _ ~ ~ _ - 1 / ~ Sidewalk - 5 x30 - 150 sf Driveway to Drenth .21 A i
_ / ' Holding Lagoon = 4000 sf Industrial Drive 2.28 A ,
- - 4.22 A / / DAF treatment faculty - 2000 sf Elite Foods ~
area = 5'x65' = 325 sf K.R. Drenth - 1.14 A / / Parking
= 28'x455' = 12740 sf Uwharrie Custom Millworks - .38 A J ~ / Driveway , ,
Parkin area = 56'x143' = 8008 sf Uwharrie Builders - .86 A I / , g _ _ / - i tr i an I e) 310 x310 x .667 64, 002 sf i ht d F i e I ds . 51 A / Tom of Troy (31 Park I ng area - (sem g Wr g - 1 ,.2s aare6
Driveway = 50 x 310 = 15500 sf S l ng I e Owner ( a I I ow ) 2.00 A / Aaeune 25X timervlaue
_ 1 t. = 62 x 46 = 2852 sf Industiral Park (1) !allow) 2.50 A / Dr I ve en - I ' Uwharrie Builders
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS: = 183,811 sf or 4.22 Acres Industiral Park (2) (allow) .67 A / Bldg. = 51'x101' = 5151 sf / Gravel storage area = 215'x100' = 21500 sf
OUS = 56% Industiral Park (3) (allow) - 1.09 A I ' PERCENT IMPERVI / 1 / / Gravel drive = 22 x111 = 2442 sf
' ~ % / TOTAL IMPERVIOUS - 15.86 A 1 ; - ' Paved parking ~ sidewalk = 55'x75' = 4125 sf
Paved drive = 34'x67' = 2278 sf
/ r TOTAL ACRES IN PARK - 56 A J / ~ ~ / / i TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 35496 sf or .81 Acres + .05 Acres = .86 Acres
i I / ~ ~ i PERCENT IMPERVIOUS = 11%
TOTAL PERCENT OF INDUSTIAL PARK / - ' '
THAT IS IMPERVIOUS = 15.86/56 = 28% ' / ' K R Drenth Truck Garage ;
Bld = 80'x50' = 4000 sf qT ~ / 9 ONLY 2 PROPERTIES OUT OF THE FIVE TH Pump station
Concrete pad = 10'x50' = 500 sf ABOVE 30. IMPERVIOUS. I / ~ _ = HAVE BUILT OUT ARE % /l i Driveway = 15'x138' = 2070 sf
Gravel parking d drive area - 130 x350 45,500 sf I / PS Concrete = 50 sf
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS: = 50,000 sf or 1.14 Acres ~ ONE OF THE 3 REMAINING 1 IS AT 26% IMPERVIOUS & I PERCENT IMPERVIOUS = 35% THE OTHER 2 ARE AT 11% AND 13%. 1 TOTAL: 2120 sf or .05 Acres
~ ; / ~ Add this area to Uwharrie Builders area
1 , / ~ ~ ~ ~ THIS SUMMARY DOES NOT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT LOW ~ ,
„ „ I / ~ 1 S THAT HAVE BEEN CLASSIFIED AS WETLANDS / G ~ LAND I ,
/ ~ ` ~ rrie Custom Millworks ON THE UWHARRIE BUILDERS SITE. THERE IS A LOT OF / Uwha I ~ ,
= 5'x80' = 6800 sf LAND THERE THAT IS UNUSEABLE. / / , ~ Bldg 8 I , ~ Wright d Fields Office Strip
Sidewalk = 90'x4 = 360 sf / / ; Bldg = 112'x35' = 3920 sf
' - IS VERY CONSERVATIVE I arkin = 41 x60 - 2460 sf USING 25% FOR THE UNSOLD SITES / , Grave p g T OF THEI / Garage = 25'x25' = 625 sf
Gravel driveway = 30 x173 = 5190 sf BASED ON THE OVERALL IMPERVIOUS PERCEN AGE / , ~ 1 / ~ Concrete pad = 25x25 = 625 sf BUILT OUT SITES. / ~ ~ , Concrete slabs = 100 sf Gravel parking = 53'x71' = 3763 sf
- 1 / ~ ~ Concrete pads= 5 x12 - 60 sf / Gravel parking = 80'x77' = 6160 sf
= 20'x71 ' = 1420 sf I / `1 Gravel drive / ~ Gravel drive = 42'x20' = 840 sf
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS: 16,915 sf or .38 Acres I / / , Asphalt parking = 49'x112' = 5488 sf
RCENT IMPERVIOUS = 13% 'f' PE _ I / , Sidewalk = 7'x 85' = 595 sf
Asphalt drive = 34'x16' = 544 sf TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 22,035 sf or .51 Acres
1 / % / PERCENT IMPERVIOUS = 26%
1 I /
/ I '
/ _ Q
- I , / - I ' _ c~
/ ' I
/ ' I , ~ ~
I / , G ~ ~
/ ' I ' ~ Q
/ ' I ' / ' 3~
I ' / ' ~
I ' / ' 0
1 ' NORTH CAROLINA /
I MONTGOMERY COUNTY / ~
DRAWING N0:
N0. 1 REV ION DATE BY APP'D SCALE: 1" = 200'
~a CARPI. I,~TF. 07-14-06 TRAY RTI~INF~~ CENTER
1 1 ~iSS1p4y DRAWN BY: EGW
TOWN OF TROY ENGIN ENGINEERING DEPT. o q 9
= aQ SEAL < CHECKED BY: SITE PLAN & WETLAND DELINATION
315 NORTH MAIN APPROVED BY: EGW fin 8467 MAIN STREET ~G F v
TROY N.C. 27 . C. 27371 f N NCINPROJECT NO. SHT. SHTS.
CRAY OF
TroyIndustwetPlat.dgn 7/16/2006 7:35:13 PM
16
amw