20120107 Ver 1_Year 3 Monitoring Report 2017_20180424

THIRD ANNUAL (2017) REPORT FOR THE
P AND U LANDS RESTORATION SITE PHASE 4
RICHLAND TOWNSHIP
BEAUFORT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared for:
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Prepared by:
CZR Incorporated
April 2018

THIRD ANNUAL (2017) REPORT FOR THE
P AND U LANDS RESTORATION SITE PHASE 4
RICHLAND TOWNSHIP
BEAUFORT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared for:
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Prepared by:
CZR Incorporated
April 2018

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
PROJECT OVERVIEW....................................................................................................1
1.1
History............................................................................................................................ 1
1.2
Location..........................................................................................................................1
1.3
Goals and Performance Criteria..................................................................................... 2
2.0
REQUIREMENTS............................................................................................................2
2.1
Normal Rainfall and Growing Season............................................................................ 2
2.2
Hydrology....................................................................................................................... 2
2.3
Vegetation...................................................................................................................... 3
2.4
Photographic Documentation......................................................................................... 3
2.5
Reporting........................................................................................................................3
3.0
2017 RESULTS................................................................................................................3
3.1
Rainfall...........................................................................................................................3
3.2
Hydrology....................................................................................................................... 3
3.3
Vegetation...................................................................................................................... 3
4.0
SUMMARY.......................................................................................................................4
LITERATURECITED.......................................................................................................................5
Cover Photo: Aerial photo looking north over Phase 4 and sections of Phase 3. 11 March 2017.
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 P and U Lands Phase 4 performance criteria, methods summary, and current
status.......................................................................................................................... T-1
Table 2 Hydroperiods of eight non -riparian monitoring wells at P and U Lands Phase 4
restoration site and three Rodman control wells during WETS normal and below
normalrainfall in 2017................................................................................................ T-2
Table 3 Hydroperiods of eight non -riparian monitoring wells at P and U Lands Phase 4
restoration site and three Rodman control wells independent of WETS
thresholdsin 2017...................................................................................................... T-4
Table 4 Third annual survival of trees and shrubs planted in eight 0.3 -acre plots at P and
ULands Phase 4........................................................................................................ T-7
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 4 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 4 Monitoring Locations
Figure 3 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 4 Monitoring Locations on Soils
Figure 4 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 4 Monitoring Locations on As Built LiDAR
Figure 5 2017 Bay City and WETS -Aurora Rainfall
Figure 6 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 4 2017 Longest Hydroperiods and
Estimated Hydrologic Zones Independent of WETS Thresholds
Figure 7 P and U Lands Mitigation Site - Phase 4 2017 Hydroperiods and Estimated
Hydrologic Zones during WETS Normal and Below Normal Rainfall
APPENDICES
Appendix A Stem Counts at Individual Plots at P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4
Appendix B Selected Third Annual Restoration Photograph
NOTE: Copy of entire report and hydrology data included on accompanying CD.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4 iii PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report April 2018

1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW
1.1 History. The approximately 3,667 -acre P and U Lands restoration site is part of
the PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.'s (PCS) compensatory mitigation to offset unavoidable
impacts to wetlands and waters authorized under United States Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) Action ID: 200110096 and North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Water
Quality Certification (WQC) #2008-0868 version 2.0. The P and U designation have no special
meaning other than that was the historic label given to PCS and Weyerhaeuser properties with
similar ownership agreements.
The P and U Lands site is a key component linking PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.'s
(PCS) Parker Farm Mitigation Site, Bay City Farm Mitigation Site, Gum Run Mitigation Site, and
the South Creek Corridor into a large and varied collection of restored wetland and preserved
natural areas (South Creek Corridor Complex). Unlike most other PCS mitigation sites, the P and
U Lands are not prior -converted agricultural fields. Other than the existing roads, most of the
acreage in which earthwork occurred was in some stage of silviculture, usually various -aged pine
stands, and contained regularly spaced ditches (deeper than the agricultural ditches on other
restoration sites that were filled in as part of restoration work) and the bedding common to pine
plantations. The removal of all standing timber and stumps and post-harvest debris presented
particular challenges as the organic soils precluded safe burning of the timber slash on site.
Consequently, some of the debris was piled into somewhat evenly shaped and sized mounds
throughout the site, which provide additional wildlife habitat.
As described in the mitigation plan prepared for the pre -construction notification (PCN) to
the USACE (CZR 2012), the site was planned to be constructed in three phases as shown on
Figure 1. These three phases were completed during the following three years: Phase 1
construction was completed in 2011 and planted in February 2012, Phase 2 construction began
in 2012 and was planted in 2013; however, construction at the lower elevations took additional
time due to excessive wetness. This delay prevented the restoration of approximately 293 acres
of the original Phase 2 which included Gum Swamp Run. During the third year, these 293 acres
and Gum Swamp Run were restored and included with the Phase 3 work completed in 2013
(planted in February of 2014). Because Phase 3 was the largest of the three phases, some of the
Phase 3 work, approximately 132 acres, was not completed until later in 2014 and was not
planted until spring of 2015. Consequently, those 132 acres became Phase 4. This report
includes results of third annual hydrology and vegetation monitoring for the 132 acres of P and U
Lands Phase 4 conducted by CZR Incorporated (CZR) of Wilmington, NC.
The design team consisted of Jonathan T. Ricketts, Inc. of Palm Beach Gardens, FL, the
restoration design engineer, PCS, and CZR. Earthwork was performed by Sawyer's Land
Developing, Inc. out of Belhaven, NC and supervised by the design team. Phase 1 and 2
restoration activities occurred September 2011 -March 2013. Phase 3 construction began in Gum
Swamp Run on 9 May 2012 and on 22 June 2012 on the larger Phase 3 area. Phase 3 was
constructed with a total of 14 NC Division of Land Resources Erosion and Sediment Control
(DLR) permits for land clearing which were subsequently modified to allow for the construction of
the interior ditch plugs and perimeter berms and ditches. Phase 4 activities were included in
three of the Phase 3 DLR permits (#s 22, 23, and 24). Planting of Phase 4 occurred in mid-
February 2015.
1.2 Location. The P and U Lands site is located east and west of Bay City Road
(SR1002), approximately 4.5 miles southeast of Aurora, Richland Township, North Carolina. Bay
City Road runs through the P Lands portion of the site, which is bounded on the east by SR 1918
(Peele Road is the unpaved extension of SR 1918) and on the south by "County Line Road" (a
gated gravel road along the Beaufort/Pamlico County border). The U Lands portion of the site
lies west and southwest of Bay City Farm (the western portion of the P Lands site referred to as
the "panhandle" separates Bay City Farm from the U Lands). South Creek and the South Creek
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4 1 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report April 2018

Canal form the northern and northwestern boundaries, Bonner/Rodman Road forms the western
boundary, and the Pamlico/Beaufort County line forms the southern boundary of the U Lands
(County Line Road itself is the southern boundary of only the eastern half of the U Lands as the
western limit of County Line Road terminates at the midpoint of the south property line). The
entire site is accessed via multiple gated roads along Bay City Road, Peele Road, County Line
Road, Gum Road, and/or Jaime/Executive Road. The site is located within the Pamlico
Hydrologic Unit 03020104 of the Tar -Pamlico River basin within the South Creek subbasin at
latitude 35.233831 and longitude 76.775742. Portions of the site can be found on the USGS
Aurora, Bayboro, South Creek, and Vandemere quadrangles (Figure 1).
1.3 Goals and Performance Criteria. The primary goal of the entire project is to re-
establish a self-sustaining functional wetland complex to allow surface water flow to move
through vegetated wetlands before reaching any stream. Mitigation yields are estimated and
performance criteria are described for the project in detail in the Compensatory Mitigation Plan for
P and U Lands Restoration Site (CZR 2012). Performance criteria for Phase 4 are summarized in
Table 1. Over time the 132 -acre Phase 4 planted portion of the site is expected to successfully
re-establish approximately:
❖ 17 wetland acres of headwater forest and
❖ 115 wetland acres of non-riverine swamp forest.
2.0 REQUIREMENTS
2.1 Normal Rainfall and Growing Season. A continuous electronic rain gauge on the
adjacent Bay City Mitigation Site is downloaded once a month and its data are used in
conjunction with data from nearby automated weather stations (e.g., NRCS WETS data from
NOAA's site at Aurora and rain gauges at other nearby monitoring sites) to determine normal
rainfall during the monitoring period. Bay City data were compared to the WETS range of normal
precipitation to determine if Bay City rainfall was within the normal range. The range of normal
precipitation for this report refers to the 30th and 70th percentile thresholds of the probability of
having onsite rainfall amounts less than or higher than those thresholds. The range of normal
and the 30 -day rolling total data lines begin on the last day of each month and the WETS -Aurora
monthly precipitation total is plotted on the last day of each month.
Under the 2010 regional guidance from the Corps of Engineers for wetland hydroperiods,
the normal growing season for Beaufort County is 28 February to 6 December or 282 days during
non -leap years (WETS table for Beaufort County first/last freeze date 28 degrees F 50 percent
probability) (US Army Corps of Engineers 2010). At the suggestion of the Corps' Washington
regulatory field office, data collected between 1 February and 27 February provide important
information related to analyses of site hydrology during the early growing season, but are not part
of the hydroperiod calculation for success.
2.2 Hydrology. Figure 2 depicts the locations of hydrology monitoring equipment,
Figure 3 shows these locations on Beaufort County soil polygons, and Figure 4 shows all
monitoring locations on the as -built LiDAR. To document surface storage and hydroperiods of all
wetland types on the site, eight semi -continuous electronic Level Troll water level monitoring
wells (manufactured by InSitu) are deployed at a density of approximately 1 well/15 acres across
all planted areas of Phase 4. Exclosures constructed of barbed wire wrapped around metal fence
posts were built around each well to reduce the likelihood of disturbance or equipment loss by
black bears.
To serve as additional hydrology controls for the entire P and U Lands site, three Level
Trolls were installed in the Rodman Tract in 2013 in an area mapped as Ponzer soil at elevations
similar to portions of Phase 4 (7 to 9 feet) and four Level Trolls were installed at previous well
locations within the adjacent Bay City Farm in late 2015. According to the soils map and LiDAR
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4 2 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report April 2018

data, these four locations also are underlain by Ponzer soils, but two are at slightly higher
elevations than the three Rodman wells (9 to 11 feet) and two are slightly lower (4 to 6 feet).
Level Trolls collect data every 1.5 hours, are downloaded once a month, and the data
evaluated to document wetland hydroperiods. Wetland hydroperiods are calculated by counting
consecutive days with water level no deeper than 12 inches below the soil surface during the
growing season under normal or below normal rainfall conditions and then for all rainfall
conditions.
2.3 Vegetation. The first annual survey of the eight 0.3 -acre planted vegetation
monitoring plots occurred August -October 2015, the second annual survey occurred October -
November 2016, and the third annual survey occurred in October 2017. The plots represent
approximately 2 percent of the restoration area (Figure 2).
2.4 Photographic Documentation. Due to the small size and similarity to the
surrounding areas of Phase 3, no photo stations were established specifically for Phase 4. The
view for Phase 3 photo station PLPS 21 faces into Phase 4, so this station is included in
Appendix B. The first annual photo was taken December 2015, the second in October 2016 and
the third in November 2017.
2.5. Reporting. The three annual reports on monitoring results have been provided as
required in 2016, 2017, and 2018 (CZR 2016, 2017).
3.0 2017 RESULTS
3.1 Rainfall. Total rainfall in 2017 at Bay City was 50.6 inches, 10.0 inches less than
2016. The 30 -day rolling total of 2017 Bay City rainfall shows the following periods as above
normal (above the WETS 70th percentile longer than several days): 1 July- 24 July, 24 August -
22 September (Figure 5). Wetland hydroperiods were calculated for the entire year regardless of
rainfall and also calculated with above normal rainfall periods excluded.
The US Drought Monitor (http://droughtmonitor.unl.edu) provides a synthesis of multiple
indices and reflects the consensus of federal and academic scientists on regional conditions on a
weekly basis (updated each Thursday). In 2017, nine of the 41 weeks of the growing season
were considered abnormally dry (DO) (10 October — 5 December); the remaining weeks were
normal with no drought status in the vicinity of the P and U Lands project area.
3.2 Hydrology. During WETS normal and below normal rainfall and rainfall conditions
independent of the WETS thresholds, all of the eight wells recorded a wetland hydroperiod
(Tables 2 and 3, Figures 6 and 7). Of the eight wells in Phase 4, seven wells had a hydroperiod
for >25-75 percent of the growing season and one well for >12.5-25 percent of the growing
season when the two periods of above normal rainfall were excluded (Table 2, Figure 6).
Independent of the WETS thresholds, one well had a hydroperiod for the entire growing season,
six wells for >25-75 percent of the growing season, and one well for >12.5-25 percent of the
growing season (Table 3, Figure 7).
The three Rodman control wells recorded a wetland hydroperiod for 25-75 percent of the
growing season, which is the same as the majority of the wells in Phase 4. The four Bay City
control wells each had a wetland hydroperiod, two wells for >6-12.5 percent, one well for >25-75
percent, and one well for >75 percent of the growing season independent of the WETS
thresholds. Only one hydroperiod for the control wells was affected by removal of the above
normal rainfall periods, BCRW-44 changed from >75 percent to >25-75 percent of the growing
season.
3.3 Vegetation. Planting zones of Phase 4 were divided into two zones or community
types: headwater forest (Z2) and non- riverine swamp forest (Z3). Using only the number of
planted stems that were unquestionably alive in the monitoring plots, the most conservative
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4 3 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report April 2018

estimate of survival is presented. Some stems may appear dead or questionable, but based on
prior monitoring experience, a stem needs to appear dead (or not be found) for two consecutive
fall survey events before it can be confidently counted as dead. After the third year (2017),
percent survival of alive stems for Zone 2 (1 plot) and Zone 3 (7 plots) was 83 percent each, with
a combined total of 16 identified species (11 trees and 5 shrubs). Appendix A contains the
number of stems that were alive in each plot for the fall 2017 survey.
Overall survival of trees that were unquestionably alive in the eight plots from the time of
planting to the third annual fall survey was 87 percent, with a corresponding density of 320 trees
per acre, 5 percent less than last year (Table 4). Individual percent survival of the 12 large and
small tree species ranged from 63 to 100 percent, with nine 75 percent or greater. Survival of
trees that could not be identified to species was zero and the survival of two unidentified stems
was questionable. If trees with uncertain survival status (stem appeared dead but could not be
confirmed) are included with trees that were definitely alive, survival increases to 93 percent and
a density of 343 trees per acre, 6 percent less than last year. The current density is higher than
the density required at the end of five years (260 stems).
Overall survival of shrubs that were unquestionably alive from the time of planting to the
second annual fall survey was 89 percent with a corresponding density of 14 shrubs per acre,
one more than last year (Table 4). Virginia sweetspire (Itea virginica), fetterbush (Lyonia lucida),
and possumhaw (Viburnum nudum) all had 100 percent survival and swamp dogwood (Cornus
foemina) had 92 percent survival.
When the identified trees and shrubs that were definitely alive are combined, density
increases to 334 stems per acre and if stems with uncertain survival are added, the density
increases to 357 stems per acre. This phase has a diverse assemblage of species with nine tree
species with a 75 percent or greater survival and four shrub species with a 90 percent or greater
survival.
The Corps determined that three tree species have the possibility to outcompete young
planted trees at a mitigation site and need to be monitored as nuisance species to ensure they do
not take over a mitigation site. These species are loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), red maple (Acer
rubrum), and sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua). During the third annual survey in 2017 only
one nuisance stem (loblolly pine) was identified in the eight nuisance plots.
4.0 SUMMARY
Total rainfall in 2017 at Bay City was 50.6 inches, 10.0 inches more than 2016. The 30 -
day rolling total of 2017 Bay City rainfall shows the following periods as above normal (above the
WETS 70th percentile longer than several days): 1 July- 24 July, 24 August - 22 September. All
of the eight wells recorded a wetland hydroperiod. Of the eight wells in Phase 4, one well had a
hydroperiod for the entire growing season, six wells for >25-75 percent of the growing season,
and one well for >12.5-25 percent of the growing season. After excluding the two periods of
above normal rainfall, seven wells had a hydroperiod for >25-75 percent of the growing season
and one well for >12.5-25 percent of the growing season.
Overall survival of large and small trees that were unquestionably alive in the eight plots
from the time of planting to the third annual fall survey in 2017 was 87 percent with a
corresponding density of 320 trees per acre. Overall survival of shrubs that were unquestionably
alive from the time of planting to the first annual fall survey was 89 percent with a corresponding
density of 14 shrubs per acre. When the trees, shrubs, and unknown species that were definitely
alive are combined, density increases to 334 stems per acre and if stems with uncertain survival
are added, the density increases to 357 stems per acre. The three most abundant tree species
compose 69 percent of the known tree species and the two most abundant shrub species
compose 82 percent of the known shrub species. The two nuisance stem surveys have shown
that red maple, sweet gum, or loblolly pine stems are not a problem in Phase 4.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4 4 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report April 2018

LITERATURE CITED
CZR Incorporated. 2012. Compensatory Mitigation Plan for P and U Lands Restoration Site.
CZR Incorporated. 2016. First Annual Report for the P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4.
CZR Incorporated. 2017. Second Annual Report for the P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4.
Kirby, Robert M. 1995. The soil survey of Beaufort County, North Carolina. Natural Resources
Conservation Service, USDA.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2002. Regulatory guidance letter (RGL) 02-02. Guidance on
Compensatory mitigation projects for aquatic resource impacts under the Corps
regulatory program pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the
Rivers and Harbors Act.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2005. Technical Standard for Water -Table Monitoring of Potential
Wetland Sites. WRAP Technical Notes Collection (ERDC TN -WRAP -05-2). U.S. Army
Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2008. Regulatory Guidance Letter (RGL) 08-03. Minimum
monitoring requirements for compensatory mitigation projects involving the restoration,
establishment, and/or enhancement of aquatic resources.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2010. Regional supplement to the Corps of Engineers wetland
delineation manual: Atlantic and Gulf coastal plain region. Version 2.0. J.S. Wakeley,
R.W. Lichvar, and C.V. Noble, eds. ERCD/EL TR -08-30, Vicksburg, MS.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4 5 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report April 2018

P
%
§
\
/
�
/
/
2
/
%
»
E
E
)
0
5
E
./
/
j
\
E
2
\
U)
M
_
�
U)
M
/
M
WI
/
/
P and U Lands Reston !a an Si! Phase 4 1 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third annum Report April 2018
2$ m 2
e ƒ: A c s 2 m
g o
e
0
Q -0 /
a) CO � E/ 2
•� 3 7\ .0 2 2 2¥§
a=§
° _
Q @
-0 2— R o
CO m 2 c 0
m
Q
m
_0 ._ m U) E 2 CO
J 7 0@$ f& CO
0 a$ƒ%
e e® m A
7 q
2
E m f a m
2
2>
2 x 2 o>_
5 2 5/ E/$
A:
4
a
m= m Q Ȥ
E E 2 f E
* 0 8 0* 0 Q®
2
0
f§
= 3 2 2-0 o
o
n
_@
k
/ /?>>
k
k
0 0\/ 0/ D
/ E ® (n a @
m%�
2 R
a
_0
> ° a o °
\
% $ » 2 m « -0 ® 0--
2 g: E®
R m / @
m 5 0/= a
U
e Q e � M e e \ @ _0
—
) / CU (0
®�� % a 0- o �
-F0
¥
{ ± 0 £ % 0 °
^
§ \
°
§
@ = E 2
G A § $ / 0
\
Q
/ / / ° / $ /
m c
m
JCO� CU
E
/
0
N k
0
08
@
E0 k
§
0
Co=f.7 E
m « �
5
.
c
/Lm
/
2
ƒ ( %
k
(.0
Q
2
7f
CD
n
0
¥
f
0 /
E
E �
3 y
c
m E e
/
g
= ;-.z'7
=
k
§ % @
m 2
2
2 2
k
.E
CO
@
/�
E0
»
k
(D
U)
k
m
@
\
�
§
a CO
2
f
.0
(n % 3
/
00C)
u
o m
q m-0 E
§
g
y 0 0 f
(
® ¥
a m
> 70
/
o
' m J
A
U) k
0-
k
.
U
0
2
0
7 0
%
% °
0
3 0.
of^��e
C:
E
§(n
-
2 k
*
§
@
7
0
(D
0 $
2
\
CL
0
.k
P and U Lands Reston !a an Si! Phase 4 1 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third annum Report April 2018

[
7
/
=
$
&
\
n
6
g
w$&
9
/
A\+
A
/ \
a
9
2&
\
7
c
04
/
$
4*$
g
c
a
9
=
0
m m �
Q
ƒ
a
LO
/
$ \
6 6
g N
6
/
@
6+
g
\
9
c
2 \
$
6+
g 9
/
= x = E
_$ E
m = m
>
§ .§
a
_»
\
% \ 3 \
Z
f 3 / §
f
®
x
x
x
x
x
x
CO E
04% q
M
a
04
§ / (
/
a
r«
'
m C= 2
2�®
(
y
r=#
w
w n
n
r&
�
Q
N«
CN
n
w m
wC14
n
n/
n
M
(1) (L)
\
/
x
C/
0
&
f§m%
c E o 0
E E
=
A
o CL
7
.§ 2 \ _
_
\LO
U)
04
d
E m k
\¢ 0 o
\N 0
§
Al
Ea\\
7
>\§o
a )
c
n
o
\<�
n
n
w
f §
f a 2 \
C\1
04
/
/
/
_
/
\04/
0)=t \
.$
/ \ (
§ % \ \
£ § o = =
g
»
c
o
&
@k_
§ 0 f
d§c
\
\
\
\
\
\
Cl)
\\\
�0) rn�0�
\M/
\ 5 k
I z (
U) ° Cl)
_\ ®
%\ 7
_\gig
$
M
c
/
=
$
&
\
n
6
g
w$&
9
/
A\+
A
/ \
a
9
2&
\
7
c
04
/
$
4*$
g
c
a
9
=
2
$
g\
A
Q
ƒ
a
\
+
9
c
/
$ \
6 6
g N
6
/
@
6+
g
\
9
c
2 \
$
6+
g 9
/
= x = E
_$ E
m = m
>
% \ 3 \
Z
f 3 / §
04% q
M
a
04
r«
'
m C= 2
\ 2 0\
2
o
n
r=#
w
w n
n
r&
�
Q
N«
CN
n
w m
wC14
w«
w
n/
n
M
(1) (L)
\/
f§m%
c E o 0
O a'-
.§ 2 \ _
_
E m k
\¢ 0 o
§
2 3
Ea\\
>\§o
c
n
o
c
n
n
w
f §
f a 2 \
C\1
04
/
/
/
/
/
r-
.$
/ \ (
§ % \ \
§ 0 f
/ \ � C14
\M/
_ E % .§
_
U)
E _
\ o =
LL
8\r-
/E 7
% 7 9
0 w E
= .�
w
w
w
t
w
w
w
w
2
\ 4 E 5
* ° I
0)-
M M
/5.\
\
\f
15 =
7
\\N\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
Z 2 < E
M S 2 3
P and U Lands Reston !a an Si! Phase 4 2 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third annum Report April 2018

0
LO
I-
A
0
LO
LO
N
A
0
Ln
N
if )
rni
N
r
(D
nl
0
v
o c >
m 3 � c
i O 00
N N O
d O N O
Q
1P
00
N
CT N M
0
M
x
W0W-7t-��KOM�KOM�-
f-
00
00
00
N
N
00
N
N
O
t
M
N
�
00 ' 00
N - N
N M O
r
M
N
N
N
O
M
CCS O N
O
00
LCA
f�
ti M
M
= M
=
M
O
M (D
U
CCS
0
N N
00 r ' 07
N N 00 N
N 00 00
U)a O
-0
00
N
N
00
N
N
N
00 '
N
N 00
t
M
N
�
00 ' 00
N - N
N M O
r
-
M
M N N
40
00 M
N N N
N i:z
O
M CCS
CCS O N
O
_=3
o
L
U
U
L
C13
M O 0)
ti
O
M 00
M 00
OD
M O Ln
N
:5
O N
00 N M
f-
[I --I-
-
M
- N
CO
M C`
V
N O N LL
v
U
LL
C N 00
N
M
It
N
Cl)
U 3 '
N
>
>
N
E
�'
a�
CU
�'
U
U
U
U
U
-0 0
m
m
m
m
N CO
00
N
00
00
CCS
N
7 O N LL
E N - 00
U N
L
L
ca O LL
N
ti
(N
L U
N
N
N
N
(n
N
N
N
N
N >
O
fUCHCS
U)a O
-0
.O
Cn
L
C
O
M CCS
O
_=3
o
U
U
L
C
E
C
O
O
f-
CY)
M
It
v
U
LL
N
M
It
N
Cl)
N
>
>
N
E
�'
�'
�'
U
U
U
U
U
m
m
m
m
m
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4
Third Annual Report
T-3 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
April 2018

[ $
ƒ .g
O 0
m �
_ CU
-0 k e
° / k
/77
a
\ -0
=2®
e 3 E
e ]
\�
@ E _
\ 0
0 e =
)f /
\\/
/
)/
-0\ 0 .R
_0 o =
\ / 0
=07
CO / k
\\
2@/
7 = 5
\ \
7�/
0 \
2 g 2
E/\
�
-r-
0
j
CL
/
0
\\/
cog
'a o \
/ \�
@° \
0-f
0
tea=
I s =
_
CIS
I B /
\ \ \
Pand U[
Third Ann
@
\
w CO a w
S
/
@
«
*
\
\
#
I-
c
�
q
\
2
»
A
2
-
\
f
/
f_
»
c &
M-
76
\
9
$
9
6
9
I-
+
^
$
N
#
9
6 \
#
g
$
A&
E
^
/
f
$
C\1
J /
g
§
C\1
N
=
2
%
6
�
-
6
6
M
\
$
/
N
® $
\
I
ƒ
\
R I \
w
A
CO
00
ands Restoration Si!
Phase 4
um Report
%G=V77
\ \ E f / k
/
@ p§ A o 0
o
ƒEm\\\
@
\
w CO a w
\R\
CO f ¢ o
23
e ® o\ t# r 2 0 t\= M& 2
\ 2 + CO t r o t M M t # M& \
S
/
@
«
\
\
\
\
#
/
\
c
�
q
\
2
»
Q
\
2
-
\
f
/
f_
»
c &
M-
76
\
9
$
9
6
9
%
+
^
$
N
#
9
m
9
#
g
$
A&
6
N
/
f
$
C\1
J /
g
C\1
N
=
2
/
6
�
®
=
6
M
$
$
/
N
® $
\R\
CO f ¢ o
23
e ® o\ t# r 2 0 t\= M& 2
\ 2 + CO t r o t M M t # M& \
\ / N \
T4 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
April 2018
0
UR2
f CU
-0
>
\00
M 0 b
�R
^
ƒ
\ \ \ \
\5\
�&\
\ \
\
R I \
m 5 0
U3\
\
00
ands Restoration Si!
Phase 4
um Report
\ / N \
T4 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
April 2018

m
-0 O
(a U
7 0 -
C
C
O
CO) It LOU
M OCD CD 0
O N N N
aS
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4 T-5
Third Annual Report
0
M
N
KA
O
00
N
Lf) I� N Cfl
U C 11 C�
00 Ln It 00 Ln It
N N N N N N
I� CO
00
r
r -
C\1
m CO 't
I- - CO
O
O
r
O
C
O
U N
E
O
Q'
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
April 2018
0
LO
rin
0
LO
11
X
X
X
LO
04
a)
n
C
N
o
ULn
N
0)
O
L{)
O
N_
A
2
Lq
N
r
Al
0
Cfl
V
O
C U) O
U)-0 O Q
M
L
N
O N O
ao
06
N
CO
N
Q
N O
L
Lf)
O
Cfl
N
M 00
M
N
It O
M
-
N
N
-
- N
N
-
-
- M
N N
6
�
&
Cfl
f� O�
&
Ln
T
00
N
I
N
00
N
N
M
6
00 N
N
0w0
N
(0 w
N
M
CSO �
00 O
U)00
a) N
OCO> U
O
O L OLO
N O
I-
Ln
�
M
M M
M
-
M
It Ln
N O
7 L ,
I-
M
M
N It
M
M
N
N
Lf) M
U O
N " C'4 LL
O L
U 3 U)
a)
>' ZCU > U
>O
CA
COir 0 -'
a3 3:c a)
00
-
N
N
CO
N
O O N LL
00
L
a) L
O U-
N
r -
CV
D
N
N
ti
N
a)
m
-0 O
(a U
7 0 -
C
C
O
CO) It LOU
M OCD CD 0
O N N N
aS
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4 T-5
Third Annual Report
0
M
N
KA
O
00
N
Lf) I� N Cfl
U C 11 C�
00 Ln It 00 Ln It
N N N N N N
I� CO
00
r
r -
C\1
m CO 't
I- - CO
O
O
r
O
C
O
U N
E
O
Q'
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
April 2018

x
7 \
\
\
x
$
_
/ \ / \
/
-N / \
A 2 0 @
CO \ CO / &
TB
\
k
�
#
x
7 \
/
x
\
N
00N
N
\
/
A
\
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
April 2018
/
%
\
0
\
I
ƒ
\
ƒ
w
\
^
/
\
6
A
ƒ
w
A
ƒ
v
x
0
U) V) 0
\
\ E f / k
®
e
0§ N 0 0
\
ƒ���0
S
/
/
/
\
\
&
\
&
$
I
\R\
f f ¢ o
\
> \ \
c
r
CO
\ R 0 -0
&
N
n
U) L
±
0 / /
C) U)
f CU
-0
> " (0
\2/\
&
= f q U-
E \ / \ \
\5\
�&\
\)\
/
e
U) 5 0
33\
\
�
\
_
U
\
E
R
U-
\
$
CO
/
CU
P and
U
Lands Reston !a an
Si!
Phase
4
Third
annum
Report
x
7 \
\
\
x
$
_
/ \ / \
/
-N / \
A 2 0 @
CO \ CO / &
TB
\
k
�
#
x
7 \
/
x
\
N
00N
N
\
/
A
\
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
April 2018

Cnr
E o
O Q) N
O O O M h O V O V O N N LO O
O
O M Lq O O
O
p
U
M N O
O M M M N
O
a) N ID
a o -
m
N N�
> Q
O LO v M 00 O O O 0) O LO 00
O N M M 00 O 0 0 0 0 O O M
M(V
0 0 0 0
O O O O C O
0)
O
O
MCn
7
O
O N
U > 00
Q) ¢
LO N M N 00 O 00 O O 00
r-1o� 00 o o^ 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD
I�
(V O 0 0 0
o 0 0 0 o
O
o
�<6
M CO CO
( (0 00 h F_ CO M O N O) N h
M CO
NM
O - V�
O
w P
LO
0
r
M
COLO
M
N
E
a)
-a)
ltnl
�
00 rl- (O N N O OO O
N
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0
M N
O C
N �
LL
>
� O M LO h O M M O Ln M
U') LO—
(O N
O � V
M
O
O M
Q
M N
I" M
M
00 M
a
� (fl N 00 Ln O 00 CD V)M M It N Il-
CO (OO
N M
M
7
H
Q
TCn
E
a)
0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 O O O
�- O
O O O O O O
O O
CO
Cl)
C
N
00
a)
>
� (fl O 00 O OM M � LO f�
O O
M 00
00 (O
C14 C\J
N CO V
M
to
N 00
Q
N N
CO ('')
M M
N N
M
CO M_
(D V M O M CO CO O d7 00
CO P,W
(V (V V
r r N N
CO
M �-
M
M
MN
M L
CO
CO
E-
CO N
CO N
N a
+
'y
t4
..O
10
N
H F-
o `0
m
Q m to
(2)
i
0
E
Q
O
)
OE
UQ
acp)a0Y
N
O
SQ
CO
O
L
tn 3- w a)
O N
-O �
CQ
" aC"
E
m08EE oo m
a)
w
L
ncn
a
U
E
�
O
-O
E E E
V
E
y= a Q y QO O)
.0
E N O a
U
U
.OL.. Q 0_ O7 COQ y0 C
3 m t
i m
in
-i� z z z 'a o cY o c� a P- CO z
CO 0 0 2 �>
ai
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4 T-7 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report April 2018

-
-_ - . 8,es* PC• ��ti .-. ..� rrj l � �- j 1 4 C • • ' _
IV
•' I 'I r , ;� r � I ' j } .. ; • yaw
_ YOUTH CREEK -� —• -- --- N.. _ ••�
R CORRIDOR
r_— I r•, 1"
J- — _ -.. ------
- —� I •• P LANDS
� m�� •••-
SOUTH CREEK g �p
J CORRIDOR L
,o
PHASE 1 '
Ao PHASE 2 ----y~
�^ HOLLOWELL TRACT PHASE 3 P L NDS
BAY CITY_'—
CONTROL SITPHASE 3
_ w
PHASE
,PHASE 4 c ° ,PARKER FARM ,1
U LANDS - P LANDS SECTIONS A—j
35'14'15.04" h'
., LONG: 76'46'19.20-
TRO -
RODr-- ---
conrzoL PHASE 4
SITE U LANDS CASEY TRACT -
! f�
= P LANDS =
N N
m
U LANDS
I 41
1 ,'� -- Lir:--=^-•-_ -y - -
LEGEND
P and U LANDS BOUNDARY
P and U LANDS PHASE 4
0 6,000 12,000
SOUTH CREEK CORRIDOR AND
PARKER FARM BOUNDARY
SCALE IN FEET
NORTH CAROLINA VICINITY MAP
P AND U LANDS PHASE 4 AND TWO CONTROL SITES
SITE LOCATION PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
P and U LANDS
SOURCE: SCALE: AS SHOWN APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY: TLJ
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009 DATE: 04/09/18 FILE: PLANDS_VIC_PH4_
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE 2016
NAD 1983EFEETRT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,"`Es CP#1745.59.32.4
' J UITE E
Ali SUDRIIV
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP IMAGES, NC STATEPLANE, L
4709 COLLEGE ACRE
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
NAD83, FEET, 1:24000—SCALE, WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG 00"INCORPORATED TEL [phone] FIGURE 1
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS FAX [phone]

LEGEND
SCALE: AS SHOWN
P & U LANDS BOUNDARY
DRAWN BY: TLJ
®
ROADS
P"INCORPORATED
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
BERMS AND PARKING AREAS
0
FORESTED WETLAND
0
FORESTED NON—WETLAND
0
OPENWATER
\ \ `
UN—PLANTED 25' OFF—SET
e
PHASE 4 WELL LOCATION
TREE SAMPLING PLOT
PHOTO STATION NUMBER AND LOCATION
PLPS 6
J
CONTROL WELL
AREAS PLANTED IN PHASE 4
0
ZONE 2 HEADWATER FOREST
0
ZONE 3 NON—RIVERINE SWAMP FOREST
NOTE:
P AND U LANDS (3,666.92 ACRES)
(TOTAL ACREAGE INCLUDES 12.52 ACRES OF
RIGHT—OF—WAY ALONG STATE ROADS NOT
PLANTED.)
SOURCE:
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNT`! GIS DATA WEBSITE
WWW. CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
NAD 1983 FEET.
EXECUTIVE ROAD
JAIME ROAD
HUUMAIV
CONTROL
SITE
1199
J, W W W
41 W W W
W W W W
W W W W W W
W W W W W W W W
Y •Y W W W W W W
W W W Y Y Y Y
•Y •Y •Y W W W W W W
W W W W Y Y Y Y
•Y •Y •Y W W W W W W
W W W W Y Y Y Y
/�� � W Y Y Y •Y •Y •Y •Y
W
SOUTH CREEK CANAL W W W y y
i W Y Y Y •Y •Y •Y •Y
PULPS 21 W W
W •Y •Y
W W W
W •Y •Y
Z1
0 W W W
D
U LANDS WWWWWW
W Y Y
PHASE 3 W W W
O� N• .r .v
200 v v v
`Y W
-• 202 `
203
205
204
0
BCRW-44
0 1,000 2,000
SCALE IN FEET
Fol
BCRW-29
BAY CITY
FARM
CONTROL
SITE
0
BCRW-33
BCRW-17 0
MONITORING LOCATIONS
P AND U LANDS PHASE 4 AND TWO CONTROL SITES
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
SCALE: AS SHOWN
APPROVED BY:
DRAWN BY: TLJ
DATE: 03/26/18
FILE: P_U_LANDS_PLANT_
MON WELL PH4 017
P"INCORPORATED
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
4709 COLLEGE ACRESUTEV2WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
CP#1745.59.32.4
FIGURE 2

J
GUM ROAD
Q
Z
W
N
=
�-
(LI
N
M
1002
F
w
N
O
I`
ROADS.R.
n
3
W
K
J
O
CA
LL1
BAY
3
U
J
O
I
Ln
J
a
w G
m
m
x
w
0
Dm
L6
--t0
U
a
�
O
V)
mZ(.7
g�
N
- 1' . -. -
-
0
r
O
U
..
3
a
al
>o
Z
o
w
CL
U
N
o
0
�
aw
RODMAN ROAD
..
~ O
N
Z
_
F -Ii
J
Zp
O
WNMpMW
}0:ZW
Z�
U
W,
G
U
p'Nma�
QQOF-
Q<
Z
O
VIN NN
N
00t'
a
Q
m
J
U
V
m
< o00
m
¢ n
0D
F- u K
warn
�Ix
a
N
`W
F
W
1
�I.y}
7p��
OWQ
D W N
a
3
W
to
a
l
p
UW
CaoHV
a
=
0-
m
z -
lzlz
Ld
Q
p
w
ii
ZQU
CLi�i
WUN
=
W
gO
}
�QKJQ
rn
O
�gv
Z
ZX
00
COUNTY LINE No.Z
a
cr
0
x
TZ
3
(n
W
U)
=Z
waw
d"
Z<o
or
Q
d
Ni` -'-.W
0
Vl�
Wood
&.y W
0
y
0w'
Qo
DOIr
nUz
—ZX.
W
x
Q
V)
Ld
��� o
(nIn
Zg
Zm>4i
w
V g�
a��
0
��
mm�z z
d
z
g
g
o
Noo
� Fs
J
�ci
as
��= �
Q
Z
�"�� 4
00��
N
Q
O
U
JO
g
N
0z
Ua'om
HN
Z
W
N
O~�X
AZO
J
w
Z
Z
J
xm
NH
wZ0_
U
UO_
�O
W(n
CL
rcE
zm W�
Q
=
J
wWaa
o
O
goo
o
}�
�g
W=
rc <�
m�z� oo
«
1m
mew
o
a
a
o
V)
R
o
=o
via
oa
J
2
}J
J=
.0.0
O
U
J_m
W
J
O W
�33b�
0
O�
O
J
GUM ROAD
Q
Z
N
N
W
F
w
O
I`
W
K
O
O
Z
_
U
O
J
x
0
r
U
�
O
V)
n
N
0
O
MQ
>o
SONNER ROAD
f -lx
RODMAN ROAD
..
iw
CL
UL,
J
Zp
O
W,
U
N
00t'
U
¢ n
F- u K
OWQ
D W N
A
CaoHV
z -
lzlz
Ld
z
w
1.
ZQU
WUN
W
gO
}
�QKJQ
�gv
Z
ZX
00
Q
0
a
cr
W w 0_
��
Q O J
MnLo Q
(n
W
U)
=Z
waw
d"
Z<o
or
Q
♦-�w
Ni` -'-.W
0
Vl�
Wood
&.y W
0
c�
Z
0w'
Qo
nUz
—ZX.
W
x
Q
V)
Ld
��� o
(nIn
Zg
Zm>4i
w
V g�
a��
0
��
mm�z z
Z"
z
g
g
o
ao=a
� Fs
J
�ci
as
��= �
�"�� 4
00��
�
7
JO
g
N
0z
Ua'om
HN
Z
W
N
O~�X
AZO
J
w
Z
Z
J
xm
NH
wZ0_
U
UO_
�O
W(n
rcE
zm W�
Q
=
J
wWaa
o
O
goo
o
}�
�g
W=
rc <�
m�z� oo
«
1m
mew
CL
a
;3�g
o
V)
Daa
=o
via
oa
J
2
}J
J=
.0.0
O
U
J_m
W
J
O W
H
N
0
O�
O
~O
Z
0O
w
om.q
N o
J I
I
U
N(n
O
00_0_
z
I
I li
nN
30
u00 03
oWy
"O.

LEGEND
PHASE 4 PLANTING AREA
OPEN WATER OR PLUGGED/FILLED DITCH
— ROADS
® PERIMETER BERM AND PARKING AREAS
UN—PLANTED 25' OFF—SET
0 FORESTED WETLAND
• WELL LOCATION
❑© CONTROL WELL
Legend
Elevation in Feet
Value
=0-2
=2-4
4-5
0 5-6
=6-7
7-88
=8-9
_9-10
_ 10-11
11-12
12-13
13-14
_ 14-15
15-16
Q 16-21
0 21-48
SOURCE:
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
WWW.CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
NAD 1983 FEET.
NORTH CAROLINA FLOODPLNN MAPPING PROGRAM, BEAUFORT AND PAMLICO COUNTIES,
LIDAR, NC STATEPLANE, NAD 1983, FEET, WWW.NCFLOODMAPS.COM
i
- / r
qr
BCRV6-44 ❑•
9 * BCRW
W
J tv #
�O �4V W
U 13
T ■
SOUTH CREEK CANAL W
EXECUTIVEROADOAD/ r * FAR. _ *1• �BCRW-17
JAIMErd 0 u
•
190
NN y� • • *T
* U LAN y W W * * Ib 4k
PHASE 3 * W W W F +
O
0 0 ■ W
K ZU LA
Dm
t
ODD • • LAND ` ti
199 200
KUUM/HIV
CONTROL
SITE
P� 0
•
203
•
204
202
_ 2
gAY C11Y NO.
n
0
C
z
-H
r
z
rri
z
0
MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS ON LIDAR
P AND U LANDS PHASE 4 AND TWO CONTROL SITES
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
SCALE: AS SHOWN APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY: TLJ
DATE: 03/26/18 FILE: P—U—LANDS—PLANT—
MON WELL PH4 017
0 11000 2,000
7 ■■�� CP#1745.59.32.4
L ■ \ 4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE
SUITE 2
n WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
SCALE IN FEET INCORPORATED TEL [phone] FIGURE 4
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS FAX [phone]

►
M,
E
_
b
L.L
A
E
/
ay
y\
�5
c
76
0
/
'10 2
\\
/
�_ m
ƒ
f
Q
2- z
4
\\
/ /
\
r §
a \ _
(
\ \ K §
$
/ coE
= e -
« @ g
{ § / /
ƒyr4 r4
m\ƒ
° ®
/
% > - o
=2.0 z
a
# 2 & \
_
g = ,
,
§
/to
7 0 �§
@ , j
! } 8
CL 0
§
±
®
3
s\2
0 E
\ e
\ \ \
/
)
C
/
_ u
) ) 0
+ > J
2
CO m
{ ± / \
r
\ \ 0
) rem ,
y
o
cu
\
\
m bD M
<�
-
= e
o
/
(
ƒ
.
/ )
J
G
%
\ \
/0
M
0
�a�e
"& ƒ
..=,w2
�
�
°
\
c
3
& ^3
m m
_
�
o
r
(9g1m)I9me�j
§
quoin
Puu § me
►
M,
E
_
b
L.L

J4
U
SOUTH CREEK CANAL
EXECUTIVE ROAD
JAIME ROAD
vz
�Z
Dm
Z"O
O°
RC -1 ov O
199 200
RC -2
O
RC -3 O 202
203
205 �
O O
RODMAN 204
CONTROL
SITE
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
WWW.CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
C)
c
70
O
D
O
W W W
W W W W
W W W W
W W W W
W W W W
W W W W
W W W W
W W W W W
W W W W
W W W W
W W W W W W
W W W W W W W W
W W W W W W W
W W W W W W W W
W W W W W W W
W W W W W W W W W
W W W W W W W W
W W W W W W W W W
W W W W W W W W
W W W W W W W W W
W W
W W W
.L W
W W W W W W
W W W
189 W W W
190 W W W
W W W
W W W
W W W
W W W
W W W
W W W
U LANDS W WW WW W
W W W
PHASE 3 W W W
W
W W W
W W W
W W
� W
W W
W W
W W W
O
BC W-4
O
BCRW 29
BAY CITY
FARM
CONTROL
SITE
LEGEND
HYDROLOGIC
P & U LANDS BOUNDARY
ZONES
PHASE 4 PLANTING AREA
D O
ROADS
0 O
BERMS AND PARKING AREAS
0
FORESTED WETLAND
0
FORESTED NON -WETLAND
D
OPENWATER
L\ \\1
UN -PLANTED 25' OFF -SET
O
PHASE 4 WELL LOCATION
CONTROL WELL
HYDROLOGIC
NOTE:
ZONES
WETLAND HYDROPERIODS
D O
= 26 - 12.5 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
0 O
= >12.5 - 25 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
(12.9 ACRES)
D O
= >25 - 75 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
(119.6 ACRES)
2
BAY CIV N°'
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.. ---00—
illillillillillllllllIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIllow
n
O
c
z
r
z
m 0 1,200 2,400
Z
O
SCALE IN FEET
N _�r�
P AND U LANDS PHASE 4 and TWO CONTROL SITES
LONGEST 2017 HYDROPERIODS AND ESTIMATED HYDROLOGIC ZONES
DURING WETS NORMAL AND BELOW NORMAL RAINFALL
(EXCLUDES JULY 1ST - JULY 24TH,
AUGUST 24TH - SEPTEMBER 22ND)
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
SCALE: AS SHOWN APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY: TLJ
DATE: 04/23/18 FILE: PLANDS_MON_WET_
PH4 2017
�^ 4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE CP#1745.59.32.4
SUITE 2
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 2IOATETEL 9108403
EN IRONM NTTARL CONSUL ANTS FAX 910%392-9139 392- 253 FIGURE 6
NOTE:
P LANDS
HYDROLOGIC ZONES ARE A VISUAL APPROXIMATION OF TOTAL ACRES
PHASE 3
REPRESENTED BY WELL HYDROPERIOD CATEGORIES BASED ON ONE
WELL PER 15 ACRES, KNOWLEDGE OF SITE CONDITIONS, AND LIDAR
CONTOURS. THE ZONES DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL HYDROPERIOD
BOUNDARIES.
2
BAY CIV N°'
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.. ---00—
illillillillillllllllIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIllow
n
O
c
z
r
z
m 0 1,200 2,400
Z
O
SCALE IN FEET
N _�r�
P AND U LANDS PHASE 4 and TWO CONTROL SITES
LONGEST 2017 HYDROPERIODS AND ESTIMATED HYDROLOGIC ZONES
DURING WETS NORMAL AND BELOW NORMAL RAINFALL
(EXCLUDES JULY 1ST - JULY 24TH,
AUGUST 24TH - SEPTEMBER 22ND)
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
SCALE: AS SHOWN APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY: TLJ
DATE: 04/23/18 FILE: PLANDS_MON_WET_
PH4 2017
�^ 4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE CP#1745.59.32.4
SUITE 2
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 2IOATETEL 9108403
EN IRONM NTTARL CONSUL ANTS FAX 910%392-9139 392- 253 FIGURE 6

SOURCE:
PORTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY: ROBERT M. CHILES,
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA, JOB #2009096, DATED: 11/19/2009
AND 02/02/2010 AND BEAUFORT COUNTY GIS DATA WEBSITE
WWW.CO.BEAUFORT.NC.US, BEAUFORT COUNTY PARCEL DATA SHAPEFILES,
NAD 1983 FEET.
LEGEND
0 O = >12.5 - 25 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
(12.9 ACRES)
0 Q = >25 - 75 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
(103.8 ACRES)
® = >75 - 100 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
(15.8 ACRES)
NOTE:
HYDROLOGIC ZONES ARE A VISUAL APPROXIMATION OF TOTAL ACRES
REPRESENTED BY WELL HYDROPERIOD CATEGORIES BASED ON ONE
WELL PER 15 ACRES, KNOWLEDGE OF SITE CONDITIONS, AND LIDAR
CONTOURS. THE ZONES DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL HYDROPERIOD
BOUNDARIES.
0 1,200 2,400
SCALE IN FEET
P & U LANDS BOUNDARY
PHASE 4 PLANTING AREA
ROADS
BERMS AND PARKING AREAS
I
FORESTED WETLAND
0
FORESTED NON -WETLAND
D
OPENWATER
L
UN -PLANTED 25' OFF -SET
O
PHASE 4 WELL LOCATION
0
CONTROL WELL
HYDROLOGIC
ZONES
WETLAND HYDROPERIODS
0
Q = >6 - 12.5 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
0 O = >12.5 - 25 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
(12.9 ACRES)
0 Q = >25 - 75 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
(103.8 ACRES)
® = >75 - 100 PERCENT OF THE GROWING SEASON
(15.8 ACRES)
NOTE:
HYDROLOGIC ZONES ARE A VISUAL APPROXIMATION OF TOTAL ACRES
REPRESENTED BY WELL HYDROPERIOD CATEGORIES BASED ON ONE
WELL PER 15 ACRES, KNOWLEDGE OF SITE CONDITIONS, AND LIDAR
CONTOURS. THE ZONES DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL HYDROPERIOD
BOUNDARIES.
0 1,200 2,400
SCALE IN FEET

APPENDIX A
Third Annual (2017) Stem Counts at Individual Plots at
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4

Appendix A. Individual tree/shrub plot counts from P and U Lands Phase 4 first (2015) and third (2017) annual fall monitoring. Numbers in each column indicate stems unquestionably alive at sampling. Plot size is 0.3 acre.
Zone 3
189
Zone 2
200
202
190
Total
Common name
Scientific name
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
Unknown
?
1
3rd
1
3rd
Serviceberry
Amelanchier canadensis
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
Red chokeberry
Aronia arbutifolia
7
Paw paw
Asima triloba
River birch
Betula nigra
9
American beautyberry
Callicarpa americana
1
1
2
2
Ironwood
Carpinus caroliniana
2
2
Water hickory
Carya aquatica
2
2
Sugarberry
Celtis laevigata
3
4
2
1
Buttonbush`
Cephalanthus occidentalis
12
11
Atlantic white cedar
Chamaecyparis thyoides
2
2
3
Sweet pepperbush
Clethra alnifolia
1
1
1
1
Silky dogwood
Cornus amomum
2
19
2
7
Swamp dogwood
C. foemina
6
4
10
10
Titi
Cyrilla racemiflora
4
5
16
6
Persimmon
Diospora virginiana
1
5
Strawberry bush
Euonymous americana
5
5
1
1
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
1
1
10
14
Deciduous holly
Ilex decidua
Inkberry
I. glabra
Winterberry
Ilex verticillata
1
1
2
1
Virginia sweetspire
Itea virginica
2
2
2
2
Swamp doghobble
Leucothoe (Eubotrys) racemosa
1
1
Spicebush
Lindera benzoin
2
Fetterbush
Lyonia lucida
Sweetbay
Magnolia virginiana
6
Mulberry
Morus rubra
20
13
22
16
Unknown gum/tupelo
Nyssa spp.
22
16
20
16
Water tupelo
N. aquatica
52
32
52
32
Swamp tupelo
Nyssa biflora
10
11
10
11
Red bay
Persea borbonia
11
9
12
10
Pond pine
Pinus serotina
2
2
1
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
2
2
1
1
Oak
Quercus spp.
8
5
White oak
Q. alba
1
Laurel oak
Q. laurifolia
2
2
Overcup oak
Q. lyrata
1
7
4
Swamp chestnut oak
Q. michauxii
18
17
10
9
Water oak
Q. nigra
5
3
10
8
Willow oak
Q. phellos
25
26
15
14
Cherrybark oak
Quercus pagodaefolia
16
15
23
25
Dwarf azalea
Rhododendron atlanticum
19
19
130
131
Swamp azalea
Rhododendron viscosum
Swamp rose
Rosa palustris
Bald cypress
Taxodium distichum
59
60
59
60
American elm
Ulmus americana
2
High bush blueberry
Vaccinium corymbosum
1
Possumhaw
Viburnum nudum
27
27
15
14
Dusty zenobia
I Zenobia pulverulenta
18
18
35
36
ALIVE STEMS
127
108
127
108
TOTALSTEMS1
127
1 130
127
130
Zone 3
189
199
200
202
203
204
205
Total
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
1 st
3rd
2
7
9
4
3
1
1
2
2
2
2
9
8
2
2
1
3
4
2
1
4
4
12
11
1
1
2
2
3
4
11
1
1
3
3
1
1
15
19
10
7
16
17
6
4
10
10
5
5
4
5
16
6
67
54
1
5
1
1
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
14
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
7
7
2
4
6
24
16
20
13
22
16
29
24
22
16
20
16
15
13
152
114
1
5
24
19
23
16
8
6
6
7
11
9
12
10
85
72
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
8
5
1
1
7
4
8
7
18
17
10
9
18
7
5
3
10
8
76
55
25
26
15
14
15
15
16
15
23
25
17
17
19
19
130
131
2
2
1
1
3
3
1
2
1
4
27
27
15
14
16
15
18
18
35
36
58
57
29
28
198
195
3
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
4
4
107
91 11
119
97
112
87
113
110
115
101
126
117
108
91
800
694
110
111
125
125
116
116
117
117
120
120
131
131
114
114
834
834
P and U Lands Phase 4 Third Annual Report A-1

APPENDIX B
Third Annual (2017) P and U Lands Phase 4 Restoration
Selected Photographs

NOTE: A 10 -foot pole marked in one -foot increments held by a biologist about 25 feet from the
camera is visible in all photos. The photo is identified with the station number (see Figure 2) and
direction of view, and date taken.
PLPS 21: southeast, top photo 2 November 2017, bottom photo 10 December 2015.
P and U Lands Restoration Site Phase 4 B-1 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Third Annual Report April 2018